skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Medical Malpractice Claims in Radiation Oncology: A Population-Based Study 1985-2012

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California (United States)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)
  3. School of Law, University of San Diego, San Diego, California (United States)
  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine trends in radiation oncology malpractice claims and expenses during the last 28 years and to compare radiation oncology malpractice claims to those of other specialties. Methods and Materials: We performed a retrospective analysis of closed malpractice claims filed from 1985 to 2012, collected by a nationwide medical liability insurance trade association. We analyzed characteristics and trends among closed claims, indemnity payments (payments to plaintiff), and litigation expenses. We also compared radiation oncology malpractice claims to those of 21 other medical specialties. Time series dollar amounts were adjusted for inflation (2012 was the index year). Results: There were 1517 closed claims involving radiation oncology, of which 342 (22.5%) were paid. Average and median indemnity payments were $276,792 and $122,500, respectively, ranking fifth and eighth, respectively, among the 22 specialty groups. Linear regression modeling of time trends showed decreasing total numbers of claims (β = −1.96 annually, P=.003), increasing average litigation expenses paid (β = +$1472 annually, P≤.001), and no significant changes in average indemnity payments (β = −$681, P=.89). Conclusions: Medical professional liability claims filed against radiation oncologists are not common and have declined in recent years. However, indemnity payments in radiation oncology are large relative to those of many other specialties. In recent years, the average indemnity payment has been stable, whereas litigation expenses have increased.

OSTI ID:
22458770
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 93, Issue 2; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Nature of Medical Malpractice Claims Against Radiation Oncologists
Journal Article · Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22458770

Malpractice and radiologists, update 1986: an 11. 5-year perspective
Journal Article · Mon Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 1986 · AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States) · OSTI ID:22458770

Industry Funding Among Leadership in Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology in 2015
Journal Article · Sun Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22458770