skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Adoption of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy For Early-Stage Breast Cancer From 2004 Through 2011

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (United States)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)
  3. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey (United States)

Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a newer method of radiation therapy (RT) that has been increasingly adopted as an adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). IMRT may result in improved cosmesis compared to standard RT, although at greater expense. To investigate the adoption of IMRT, we examined trends and factors associated with IMRT in women under the age of 65 with early stage breast cancer. Methods and Materials: We performed a retrospective study of early stage breast cancer patients treated with BCS followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) who were ≤65 years old in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2011. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with receipt of IMRT (vs standard RT). Results: We identified 11,089 women with early breast cancer (9.6%) who were treated with IMRT and 104,448 (90.4%) who were treated with standard RT, after BCS. The proportion of WBI patients receiving IMRT increased yearly from 2004 to 2009, with 5.3% of WBI patients receiving IMRT in 2004 and 11.6% receiving IMRT in 2009. Further use of IMRT declined afterward, with the proportion remaining steady at 11.0% and 10.7% in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Patients treated in nonacademic community centers were more likely to receive IMRT (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.43 for nonacademic vs academic center). Compared to privately insured patients, the uninsured patients (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95) and those with Medicaid insurance (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95) were less likely to receive IMRT. Conclusions: The use of IMRT rose from 2004 to 2009 and then stabilized. Important nonclinical factors associated with IMRT use included facility type and insurance status.

OSTI ID:
22458596
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 91, Issue 2; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Adoption of Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Data Base Analysis
Journal Article · Mon Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2014 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22458596

Clinical Pathways: A Catalyst for the Adoption of Hypofractionation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Journal Article · Sun Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2015 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22458596

Accelerated Whole Breast Irradiation With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy to the Prone Breast
Journal Article · Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2009 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22458596