The difference of scoring dose to water or tissues in Monte Carlo dose calculations for low energy brachytherapy photon sources
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6201 BN (Netherlands)
Purpose: The goal of this work is to compare D{sub m,m} (radiation transported in medium; dose scored in medium) and D{sub w,m} (radiation transported in medium; dose scored in water) obtained from Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for a subset of human tissues of interest in low energy photon brachytherapy. Using low dose rate seeds and an electronic brachytherapy source (EBS), the authors quantify the large cavity theory conversion factors required. The authors also assess whether applying large cavity theory utilizing the sources' initial photon spectra and average photon energy induces errors related to spatial spectral variations. First, ideal spherical geometries were investigated, followed by clinical brachytherapy LDR seed implants for breast and prostate cancer patients. Methods: Two types of dose calculations are performed with the GEANT4 MC code. (1) For several human tissues, dose profiles are obtained in spherical geometries centered on four types of low energy brachytherapy sources: {sup 125}I, {sup 103}Pd, and {sup 131}Cs seeds, as well as an EBS operating at 50 kV. Ratios of D{sub w,m} over D{sub m,m} are evaluated in the 0-6 cm range. In addition to mean tissue composition, compositions corresponding to one standard deviation from the mean are also studied. (2) Four clinical breast (using {sup 103}Pd) and prostate (using {sup 125}I) brachytherapy seed implants are considered. MC dose calculations are performed based on postimplant CT scans using prostate and breast tissue compositions. PTV D{sub 90} values are compared for D{sub w,m} and D{sub m,m}. Results: (1) Differences (D{sub w,m}/D{sub m,m}-1) of -3% to 70% are observed for the investigated tissues. For a given tissue, D{sub w,m}/D{sub m,m} is similar for all sources within 4% and does not vary more than 2% with distance due to very moderate spectral shifts. Variations of tissue composition about the assumed mean composition influence the conversion factors up to 38%. (2) The ratio of D{sub 90(w,m)} over D{sub 90(m,m)} for clinical implants matches D{sub w,m}/D{sub m,m} at 1 cm from the single point sources. Conclusions: Given the small variation with distance, using conversion factors based on the emitted photon spectrum (or its mean energy) of a given source introduces minimal error. The large differences observed between scoring schemes underline the need for guidelines on choice of media for dose reporting. Providing such guidelines is beyond the scope of this work.
- OSTI ID:
- 22096939
- Journal Information:
- Medical Physics, Vol. 38, Issue 3; Other Information: (c) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0094-2405
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Fast patient-specific Monte Carlo brachytherapy dose calculations via the correlated sampling variance reduction technique
Monte Carlo study of LDR seed dosimetry with an application in a clinical brachytherapy breast implant
Related Subjects
61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ANIMAL TISSUES
BRACHYTHERAPY
CAT SCANNING
CESIUM 131
CONVERSION
DOSE RATES
DOSIMETRY
GYNECOLOGY
IODINE 125
MAMMARY GLANDS
MONTE CARLO METHOD
NEOPLASMS
PALLADIUM 103
PATIENTS
PHOTONS
POINT SOURCES
PROSTATE
RADIATION DOSES
RADIATION SOURCE IMPLANTS
RADIATION TRANSPORT
RECOMMENDATIONS
SIMULATION
SPECTRAL SHIFT
WATER