skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Complications of Microwave Ablation for Liver Tumors: Results of a Multicenter Study

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Department of Interventional Radiology (Italy)
  2. San Gerardo Hospital, Department of Radiology (Italy)
  3. Azienda Ospedaliera di Busto Arsizio, Department of Interventional Radiology (Italy)
  4. Azienda Universita di Padova, General Surgery and Organ Transplantation (Italy)

Purpose: New technologies for microwave ablation (MWA) have been conceived, designed to achieve larger areas of necrosis compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The purpose of this study was to report complications by using this technique in patients with focal liver cancer. Methods: Members of 14 Italian centers used a 2.45-GMHz generator delivering energy through a cooled miniature-choke MW antenna and a standardized protocol for follow-up. They completed a questionnaire regarding number and type of deaths, major and minor complications and side effects, and likelihood of their relationship to the procedure. Enrollment included 736 patients with 1.037 lesions: 522 had hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis, 187 had metastases predominantly from colorectal cancer, and 27 had cholangiocellular carcinoma. Tumor size ranged from 0.5 to 10 cm. In 13 centers, the approach used was percutaneous, in 4 videolaparoscopic, and in 3 laparotomic. Results: No deaths were reported. Major complications occurred in 22 cases (2.9%), and minor complications in 54 patients (7.3%). Complications of MWA do not differ from those RFA, both being based on the heat damage. Conclusion: Results of this multicenter study confirmed those of single-center experiences, indicating that MWA is a safe procedure, with no mortality and a low rate of major complications. The low rate of complications was probably due to precautions adopted, knowing in advance possible risk conditions, on the basis of prior RFA experience.

OSTI ID:
22066593
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 35, Issue 4; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Use of Semiflexible Applicators for Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors
Journal Article · Sat Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2006 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22066593

Quality Improvement Guidelines for Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumours
Journal Article · Mon Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2010 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22066593

MWA Versus RFA for Perivascular and Peribiliary CRLM: A Retrospective Patient- and Lesion-Based Analysis of Two Historical Cohorts
Journal Article · Sat Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22066593