skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Patterns of Care in Elderly Head-and-Neck Cancer Radiation Oncology Patients: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1]; ;  [1];  [2]; ;  [1];  [1]; ; ;  [1];  [3];  [4];  [1]
  1. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  2. Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  4. Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON (Canada)

Purpose: To compare the patterns of care for elderly head-and-neck cancer patients with those of younger patients. Methods and Materials: A retrospective review was conducted of all new mucosal head-and-neck cancer referrals to radiation oncology between July 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007 at our institution. The clinical characteristics, treatment pattern, tolerance, and outcomes were compared between the elderly (aged {>=}75 years) and younger (aged <75 years) cohorts. Results: A total of 2,312 patients, including 452 (20%) elderly and 1,860 (80%) younger patients, were studied. The elderly patients were more likely to be women (36% vs. 27%, p <.01) and to have other malignancies (23% vs. 13%, p <.01), Stage I or II disease (38% vs. 32%, p <.01), and N0 status (56% vs. 42%, p <.01). Treatment was less often curative in intent (79% vs. 93%, p <.01). For the 1,487 patients who received definitive radiotherapy (RT), no differences were found between the elderly (n = 238) and younger (n = 1,249) patients in treatment interruption, completion, or treatment-related death. Within the subset of 760 patients who received intensified treatment (concurrent chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated accelerated RT), no difference was seen between the elderly (n = 46) and younger (n = 714) patients in treatment interruption, completion, or treatment-related death. After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 2-year cause-specific survival rate after definitive RT was 72% (range, 65-78%) for the elderly vs. 86% (range, 84-88%) for the younger patients (p <.01). Conclusion: Elderly head-and-neck cancer patients exhibited different clinical characteristics and experienced different patterns of care from younger patients. Although age itself was an adverse predictor of cause-specific survival, its effect was modest. Elderly patients selected for definitive RT or intensified RT showed no evidence of impaired treatment tolerance.

OSTI ID:
21491535
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 79, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.052; PII: S0360-3016(09)03528-7; Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Retrospective Study of Palliative Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Carcinoma
Journal Article · Tue Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2011 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21491535

Tolerability of Combined Modality Therapy for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients Aged 75 Years and Older
Journal Article · Thu Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2011 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21491535

Risk of Cerebrovascular Events in Elderly Patients After Radiation Therapy Versus Surgery for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer
Journal Article · Tue Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2013 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21491535