skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY DURING ECLIPSE OF THE YOUNG SUBSTELLAR ECLIPSING BINARY 2MASS 0535-0546. I. PRIMARY SPECTRUM: COOL SPOTS VERSUS OPACITY UNCERTAINTIES

Journal Article · · Astrophysical Journal
 [1];  [2]
  1. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 (United States)
  2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 (United States)

We present high-resolution Keck optical spectra of the very young substellar eclipsing binary 2MASS J05352184-0546085, obtained during eclipse of the lower-mass (secondary) brown dwarf. The observations yield the spectrum of the higher-mass (primary) brown dwarf alone, with negligible ({approx}1.6%) contamination by the secondary. We perform a simultaneous fine analysis of the TiO-{epsilon} band and the red lobe of the K I doublet, using state-of-the-art PHOENIX DUSTY and COND synthetic spectra. Comparing the effective temperature and surface gravity derived from these fits to the empirically determined surface gravity of the primary (log g = 3.5) then allows us to test the model spectra as well as probe the prevailing photospheric conditions. We find that: (1) fits to TiO-{epsilon} alone imply T{sub eff} = 2500 {+-} 50 K; (2) at this T{sub eff}, fits to K I imply log g = 3.0, 0.5 dex lower than the true value; and (3) at the true log g, K I fits yield T{sub eff} = 2650 {+-} 50 K, {approx}150 K higher than from TiO-{epsilon} alone. On the one hand, these are the trends expected in the presence of cool spots covering a large fraction of the primary's surface (as theorized previously to explain the observed T{sub eff} reversal between the primary and secondary). Specifically, our results can be reproduced by an unspotted stellar photosphere with T{sub eff} = 2700 K and (empirical) log g = 3.5, coupled with axisymmetric cool spots that are 15% cooler (2300 K), have an effective log g = 3.0 (0.5 dex lower than photospheric), and cover 70% of the surface. On the other hand, the trends in our analysis can also be reproduced by model opacity errors: there are lacks in the synthetic TiO-{epsilon} opacities, at least for higher-gravity field dwarfs. Stringently discriminating between the two possibilities requires combining the present results with an equivalent analysis of the secondary (predicted to be relatively unspotted compared to the primary).

OSTI ID:
21464640
Journal Information:
Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 722, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1138; ISSN 0004-637X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English