skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: XMM-NEWTON OBSERVATIONS OF THE ENIGMATIC LONG PERIOD ECLIPSING BINARY EPSILON AURIGAE: CONSTRAINING THE PHYSICAL MODELS

Journal Article · · Astronomical Journal (New York, N.Y. Online)
;  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (United States)
  2. Department of Astronomy, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085 (United States)
  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208 (United States)

We report on an XMM-Newton observation of the unusual, long period (F0 supergiant + cool disk companion) eclipsing binary star {epsilon} Aurigae observed in X-rays prior to the onset of the 2009-2011 eclipse phase. While it appears certain that a disk-like body is obscuring the star, it remains unclear what kind of object is at the center of the disk. The XMM-Newton observation had a duration of {approx}25 ks. The X-ray image does not show a source at the optical position of the star. We have determined a limiting X-ray flux of about 2.5 x 10{sup -15} erg cm{sup -2} s{sup -1}. This flux is equivalent to a luminosity of about log L{sub X} {approx} 29.3-29.7 erg s{sup -1} for an unabsorbed source at the assumed distance, estimated to be between 650 and 1300 pc. The direct emission from an otherwise unobscured primary is excluded at a level above L{sub X} {approx} 4 x 10{sup 29} erg s{sup -1}. We explore the physical constraints that these limits put on the primary and several proposed models for the system secondary. For a black hole, we find that the direct absorption required by the disk is approximately N{sub H} {>=} 10{sup 25} cm{sup -2}. While not unreasonable for a protoplanetary disk, the lack of secondary X-rays makes this model unlikely. For high-mass models, in which the disk harbors pre-main-sequence stars, we find a minimum disk absorption of N{sub H} {>=} 10{sup 23} cm{sup -2}. Since this is not unlikely for a protoplanetary disk, this is not a significant constraint. For low-mass models, in which the disk harbors older stars, the known line-of-sight absorption is nearly enough to account for the non-detection. The data do not discriminate between these models.

OSTI ID:
21443259
Journal Information:
Astronomical Journal (New York, N.Y. Online), Vol. 140, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/595; ISSN 1538-3881
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English