skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Evaluating the Role of Prophylactic Gastrostomy Tube Placement Prior to Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2]; ;  [3]; ; ; ;  [1]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (United States)
  2. Department of Medical Oncology, University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (United States)
  3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA (United States)

Purpose: To determine the effect of prophylactic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement on acute and long-term outcome for patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methods and Materials: One hundred twenty consecutive patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy for Stage III/IV head and neck cancer to a median dose of 70 Gy (range, 64-74 Gy). The most common primary site was the oropharynx (66 patients). Sixty-seven patients (56%) were treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Seventy patients (58%) received prophylactic GT placement at the discretion of the physician before initiation of chemoradiotherapy. Results: Prophylactic GT placement significantly reduced weight loss during radiation therapy from 43 pounds (range, 0 to 76 pounds) to 19 pounds (range, 0 to 51 pounds), which corresponded to a net change of -14% (range, 0% to -30%) and -8% (range, +1% to -22%) from baseline, respectively (p < 0.001). However, the proportion of patients who were GT-dependent at 6- and 12-months after treatment was 41% and 21%, respectively, compared with 8% and 0%, respectively, for those with and without prophylactic GT (p < 0.001). Additionally, prophylactic GT was associated with a significantly higher incidence of late esophageal stricture compared with those who did not have prophylactic GT (30% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although prophylactic GT placement was effective at preventing acute weight loss and the need for intravenous hydration, it was also associated with significantly higher rates of late esophageal toxicity. The benefits of this strategy must be balanced with the risks.

OSTI ID:
21438037
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 78, Issue 4; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.036; PII: S0360-3016(09)03278-7; Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Long-Term Outcomes and Toxicity of Concurrent Paclitaxel and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer
Journal Article · Wed Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21438037

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: Toxicity and Preliminary Efficacy
Journal Article · Sat Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2008 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21438037

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience
Journal Article · Wed Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2006 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21438037