Stakeholder decision-making for radioactive waste management advice given in the US and UK
- Math and Psychology, Paine College, Augusta, GA (United States)
- Nexia Solutions, Risley, Warrington, Chesire, WA (United Kingdom)
- Department of Chemistry and Physics, Augusta State Univ., Augusta, GA (United States)
- Mathematics, Paine College, Augusta, GA (United States)
We continue our past research with a study of participation by citizens providing advice on nuclear waste management decisions in the UK and US. This study is unique in that citizen participation programs in both countries are at very different stages: not yet fully operational in the UK, but mature in the US. Our hope is that a review of the programs in both of these countries can lead to findings that may benefit these and other countries as well. In summary: 1. Decision structure has a significant impact on the advice given by the public Citizen Advisory Boards to DOE. The control scheme used by an organization can lead to more rational decisions or more practical ones. Rational decisions are more likely to occur under consensus-seeking while practical decisions are more likely under majority rule ('truth seeking'). 2. CR, designed to reduce conflict, appears to promote it. The source of this conflict appears to be the inability of agents under CR to manage risk perceptions and other illusions, to produce advice that is sufficiently practical to accelerate or even to advance cleanup, and the production of a single world view incongruous with that of its sponsor, DOE. 3. Counter-intuitively, building a consistent world view sufficient to accommodate all of the parties to a decision de-emphasizes uncertainty and disagreement. For example, 'Setting aside or minimizing the importance of key structural uncertainties in underlying processes is a frequent outcome of the drive for consensus'. 4. CR produces pernicious side effects often sought by authoritarian rulers. After the new EU constitution was rejected by the voters of Europe in France and Denmark, it left the EU leadership in gridlock; they had previously rejected CR because it holds its member states hostage to the dictates of a few. The new treat signed by EU leaders on December 13, 2007 'alters the EU's decision-making architecture. More decisions are to be taken by majority vote, removing the need for unanimous endorsement which in the past has stymied the bloc's efforts to present a united front'. 5. These comparative studies have been very helpful in advancing a theory of organizational dynamics. As an analogy, we have begun to think about these ideas as the propagation of 'elastic social wave-fields', and hope to construct mathematical models to mimic them. In a sense, the addition of competitive or oppositely-voiced driven decision making can be modeled as heterogeneities in the medium in which the wave-field propagates, or as additional forcing functions that influence periodic behaviors. (authors)
- Research Organization:
- WM Symposia, 1628 E. Southern Avenue, Suite 9 - 332, Tempe, AZ 85282 (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 21326127
- Report Number(s):
- INIS-US-10-WM-08338; TRN: US10V0547067492
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: WM'08: Waste Management Symposium 2008 - HLW, TRU, LLW/ILW, Mixed, Hazardous Wastes and Environmental Management - Phoenix Rising: Moving Forward in Waste Management, Phoenix, AZ (United States), 24-28 Feb 2008; Other Information: Country of input: France; 42 refs
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Restoring public trust while tearing down site in rural Ohio
Disposing of High-Level Radioactive Waste in Germany - A Note from the Licensing Authority - 12530