skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Clinical Evaluation of Positioning Verification Using Digital Tomosynthesis and Bony Anatomy and Soft Tissues for Prostate Image-Guided Radiotherapy

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1]; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [1]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (United States)

Purpose: To evaluate on-board digital tomosynthesis (DTS) for patient positioning vs. two-dimensional (2D) radiography and three-dimensional cone beam (CBCT). Methods and Materials: A total of 92 image sessions from 9 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. An on-board image set was registered to a corresponding reference image set. Four pairs of image sets were used: digitally reconstructed radiographs vs. on-board orthogonal paired radiographs for the 2D method, coronal-reference DTS vs. on-board coronal DTS for the coronal-DTS method, sagittal-reference DTS vs. on-board sagittal DTS for the sagittal-DTS method, and planning CT vs. CBCT for the CBCT method. The registration results were compared. Results: The systematic errors in all methods were <1 mm/1{sup o}. When registering the bony anatomy, the mean vector difference was 0.21 {+-} 0.11 cm between 2D and CBCT, 0.11 {+-} 0.08 cm between CBCT and coronal DTS, and 0.14 {+-} 0.07 cm between CBCT and sagittal DTS. The correlation between CBCT to DTS was stronger (coefficient = 0.92-0.95) than the correlation between 2D and CBCT or DTS (coefficient = 0.81-0.83). When registering the soft tissue, the mean vector difference was 0.18 {+-} 0.11 cm between CBCT and coronal DTS and 0.29 {+-} 0.17 cm between CBCT and sagittal DTS. The correlation coefficient of CBCT to sagittal DTS and to coronal DTS was 0.84 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusion: DTS could provide equivalent results to CBCT when the bony anatomy is used as landmarks for prostate image-guided radiotherapy. For soft tissue-based positioning verification, coronal DTS produced equivalent results to CBCT, but sagittal DTS alone was insufficient. DTS could allow for comparable soft tissue-based target localization with faster scanning time and a lower imaging dose compared with CBCT.

OSTI ID:
21172567
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 73, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.006; PII: S0360-3016(08)03433-0; Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

On-Board Patient Positioning for Head-and-Neck IMRT: Comparing Digital Tomosynthesis to Kilovoltage Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Journal Article · Mon Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172567

A frequency-based approach to locate common structure for 2D-3D intensity-based registration of setup images in prostate radiotherapy
Journal Article · Sun Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2007 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:21172567

Digital tomosynthesis with an on-board kilovoltage imaging device
Journal Article · Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172567