skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A comparative analysis of radiological and surgical placement of central venous catheters

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S002709900103· OSTI ID:21080247
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [2];  [1]
  1. Royal Hallamshire Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  2. Royal Hallamshire Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Surgery (United Kingdom)
  3. Royal Hallamshire Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Hematology (United Kingdom)

Purpose. To compare the differences in practice and outcome of all radiologically and surgically placed central venous catheters retrospectively over a 2-year period simultaneously, at a single institution. Methods.A total of 253 Hickman catheters were inserted in 209 patients; 120 were placed radiologically in 102 patients and 133 were placed surgically in 107 patients. The indication was chemotherapy in 76% of radiological and in 47% of surgical cases; the remainder were for total parenteral nutrition and venous access. Results. There were 6 (4.5%) primary surgical failures and a further 17 (13%) surgical cases requiring multiple placement attempts. Pneumothorax occurred once (0.8%) surgically and four times (3.3%) radiologically. There were no radiological primary misplacements but there were five (3.7%) surgical ones. Catheter or central vein thrombosis occurred in four (3.3%) radiological and five (3.7%) surgical cases. The rate of infection per 1000 catheter-days was 1.9 in radiologically placed catheters and 4.0 in surgically placed ones (p<0.001). Average catheter life-span was similar for the two placement methods (100{+-}23 days). Conclusion. Radiological placement is consistently more reliable than surgical placement. There are fewer placement complications and fewer catheter infections overall.

OSTI ID:
21080247
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 20, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1007/s002709900103; Copyright (c) 1997 Springer-Verlag New York Inc; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Ultrasound-Guided Radiological Placement of Central Venous Port via the Subclavian Vein: A Retrospective Analysis of 500 Cases at a Single Institute
Journal Article · Fri Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21080247

Venous Access Ports: Indications, Implantation Technique, Follow-Up, and Complications
Journal Article · Wed Aug 15 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21080247

Previous PICC Placement May Be Associated With Catheter-Related Infections in Hemodialysis Patients
Journal Article · Tue Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2011 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21080247