Does mechanistic understanding help in risk assessment-the example of dioxins
- KTL, National Public Health Institute, Department of Environmental Health, Centre for Environmental Health Risk Analysis, P.O. Box 95, FIN-70701 Kuopio (Finland)
Risk assessment is based on scientific information, in part on 'regulatory toxicology', i.e., studies following protocols accepted by national or international authorities, and in part on fundamental scientific information clarifying the mechanisms of toxicity and giving a better possibility to evaluate also the findings of routine safety studies. Both are needed, and increased biological understanding increases the possibilities of handling the data in a rational way. In addition, risk assessment seems to include some built-in assumptions that are not necessarily scientific at all. This review attempts to highlight the distortions that are possible if we follow certain rules in a blinkered way not taking into consideration all aspects of the risk. The highly controversial risk assessment of dioxins is used to exemplify the difficulties of excessively straightforward risk analysis process.
- OSTI ID:
- 20721882
- Journal Information:
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Vol. 207, Issue 2,suppl.1; Conference: ICT X 2004: 10. international congress of toxicology: Living in a safe chemical world, Tampere (Finland), 11-15 Jul 2004; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.053; PII: S0041-008X(05)00335-2; Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0041-008X
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
The ABCs of risk assessment: Some basic principles can help people understand why controversies occur
Interim procedures for estimating risks associated with exposures of mixtures of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and -dibenzofurans (CDDS and CDFS)