Optimal two-point static calibration of measurement systems with quadratic response
- Instrumentation, Sensors and Interfaces Group, Technical School of Castelldefels, Department of Electronic Engineering , Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Avenida del Canal Olimpic s/n, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona) (Spain)
Measurement devices and instruments must be calibrated after manufacture to correct for component and assembly tolerances, and periodically to correct for drift and aging effects. The number of reference inputs needed for calibration depends on the actual transfer characteristic and the desired accuracy. Often, a linear characteristic is assumed for simplicity, either for the overall input range (global linearization) or for successive input subranges (piecewise linearization). Thus, only two reference inputs are needed for each straight line. This two-point static calibration can be easily implemented in any system having some basic computation capability and allows for the correction of zero and gain errors, and of their drifts if the system is periodically calibrated. Often, the reference inputs for that calibration are the end values of the measurement range (or subrange). However, this is not always the optimal selection because the calibration error is minimal for those reference inputs only, which are not necessarily the most relevant inputs for the system being considered. This article proposes three optimization criteria for the selection of calibration points: limiting the maximal error (LME), minimizing the integral square error (ISE), and minimizing the integral absolute error (IAE). Each of these criteria needs reference inputs whose values are symmetrical with respect to the midrange input (x{sub c}), have the form x{sub c}{+-}{delta}x/(2{radical}n) when the measurand has a uniform probability distribution function, {delta}x being the measurement span, and do not depend on the nonlinearity of the actual response, provided this is quadratic. The factor n depends on the particular criterion selected: n=2 for LME, n=3 for ISE, and n=4 for IAE. These three criteria give parallel calibration lines and can also be applied to other nonlinear responses by dividing the measurement span into convenient intervals. The application of those criteria to the linearization of a type-J thermocouple illustrate their performance and advantages with respect to the customary end-point linearization (n=1) even for nonquadratic responses. For quadratic responses, n=1 yields the maximal error at the center of the input measurement range.
- OSTI ID:
- 20644034
- Journal Information:
- Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 75, Issue 12; Other Information: DOI: 10.1063/1.1818531; (c) 2004 American Institute of Physics; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0034-6748
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Mobile CEM trailer and data acquisition and handling system for complying with CFR title 40, Part 60
Calibration of NRSF2 Instrument at HFIR