skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Oilfield pollution: Can there be settlement without remediation

Conference ·
OSTI ID:146221
 [1]
  1. Boesche, McDermott, & Eskridge, Tulsa, OK (United States)

In 1964, an oil well blew out. Over the years, oil continued to seep from the location. Suit was filed in 1985 for $31 Million for loss of value of the land, costs of remediation and costs to plug the well properly. An action was also filed in the state conservation commission by the operator. In 1987, the trial court held that the operator owed $4.512 Million in damages including $2.1 Million for proper plugging of the well and another $2.1 Million for remediation costs. Also in 1987, the state conservation commission ruled that the well was proper plugged and abandoned and ordered operator to complete an approved remediation plan. The case was appealed and was eventually settled after rulings by the state Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. paper discusses: (1) case study of the above and circumstances and the resulting inconsistencies between the administrative agency rulings the civil court`s rulings and how they affect as well as settlement of claims; (2) another case study where a court ruled that regardless of a settlement that included the payment of remediation costs to the surface owner, the operator was primarily liable for clean-up costs to the administrative agency and the operator`s bond was forfeited to cover the costs of clean-up; (3) the most recent state Supreme Court ruling to affect this issue; (4) the legal ramifications of settlement without remediation of an oil field pollution site.

OSTI ID:
146221
Report Number(s):
CONF-950333-; TRN: 95:006211-0050
Resource Relation:
Conference: 2. SPE/EPA exploration and production environmental conference: government and industry working together to find cost effective approaches to protecting the environment, Houston, TX (United States), 27-29 Mar 1995; Other Information: PBD: 1995; Related Information: Is Part Of Proceedings of the SPE/EPA exploration & production environmental conference; PB: 797 p.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Congressional consent to the interstate compact to conserve oil and gas: is it superfluous in view of the decision in United State Steel Corporation v. Multistate Tax Commission
Journal Article · Fri Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1979 · Interstate Oil Compact Comm. Com. Bull.; (United States) · OSTI ID:146221

High court limits tax deduction for depletion
Journal Article · Mon Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 1993 · Public Utilities Fortnightly; (United States) · OSTI ID:146221

Final programmatic environmental impact statement for the uranium mill tailings remedial action ground water project. Volume I
Technical Report · Tue Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996 · OSTI ID:146221