Experimental and modeling study of fuel interactions with an alkyl nitrate cetane enhancer, 2-ethyl-hexyl nitrate

Journal Article · Tue Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Proceedings of the Combustion Institute

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.048· OSTI ID:1395518

Goldsborough, S. S. ^[1]; Johnson, M. V. ^[2]; Banyon, C. ^[2]; Pitz, W. J. ^[3]; McNenly, M. J. ^[3]

---

1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Energy Systems Division; Univ. of Illinois, Chicago, IL (United States). Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
2. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Energy Systems Division
3. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

Our study investigates the autoignition behavior of two gasoline surrogates doped with an alkyl nitrate cetane enhancer, 2-ethyl-hexyl nitrate (2EHN) to better understand dopant interactions with the fuels, including influences of accelerating kinetic pathways and enhanced exothermicity. A primary reference fuel (PRF) blend of n-heptane/iso-octane, and a toluene reference fuel (TRF) blend of n-heptane/iso-octane/toluene are used where the aromatic fraction of the latter is set to 20% (liquid volume), while the content of n-heptane is adjusted so that the overall reactivity of the undoped fuels is similar, e.g., Anti-Knock Index (AKI) of similar to 91, Cetane Number (CN) similar to 25. Doping levels of 0.1, 1.0 and 3.0% (liquid volume basis) are used where tests are conducted within a rapid compression machine (RCM) at a compressed pressure of 21 bar, covering temperatures from 675 to 1025 K with stoichiometric fuel-oxygen ratios at O-2 = 11.4%. At the experimental conditions, it is found that the doping effectiveness of 2EHN is fairly similar between the two fuels, though 2EHN is more effective in the aromatic blend at the lowest temperatures, while it is slightly more effective in the non-aromatic blend at intermediate temperatures. Furthermore, kinetic modeling of the experiments indicates that although some of the reactivity trends can be captured using a detailed model, the extents of predicted Cetane Number enhancement by 2EHN are too large, while differences in fuel interactions for the two fuels result in excessive stimulation of the non-aromatic blend. Sensitivity analysis using the kinetic model indicates that the CH₂O and CH₃O₂ chemistry are very sensitive to the dopant at all conditions. The rate of 2EHN decomposition is only important at low temperatures where its decomposition rate is slow due to the high activation energy of the reaction. At higher temperatures, dopant-derived 3-heptyl radicals are predicted to play an important role stimulating ignition. Finally, nitrogen chemistry is important through the 'NO - NO₂ loop' where this can generate substantial amounts of OH. But, at the highest doping levels the formation of methyl and ethyl nitrite, and nitric acid significantly competes with this so that less OH is generated and this constrains the reactivity enhancement of 2EHN.

• Research Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Vehicle Technologies Office (EE-3V); USDOE Office of Science (SC); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Sustainable Transportation. Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO)
• Grant/Contract Number: AC52-07NA27344; AC02-06CH11357
• OSTI ID: 1395518
• Alternate ID(s): OSTI ID: 1251899
• Report Number(s): LLNL-JRNL-654470; PII: S1540748914002065
• Journal Information: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 35, Issue 1; ISSN 1540-7489
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION
37 INORGANIC
ORGANIC
PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Rapid compression machine
Cetane enhancer
Alkyl nitrates
Fuel interactions