Superfund Reform 1995. Principles for a new Superfund program
- Texaco, Washington, DC (United States)
Superfund Reform `95 is a broad coalition of small and large businesses and local governments. Superfund Reform `95 believes now is the time for a new law to be drafted based on the principles and programmatic elements described below. Superfund Reform `95 believes that the program they are proposing will generate efficiencies and cost savings that will permit it to be implemented without the need to increase the total amount of taxes currently being levied to support the Superfund. The current federal Superfund program is badly broken and in need of major restructuring. The existing Superfund program must be replaced by a new program in which the benefits justify its cost and which is equitable, cost-effective, and limited in size and scope so that it is targeted to address real, current, and significant risks to human health and environment posed by the past disposal of hazardous substances. The size of the federal National Priorities List (NPL) should be capped so that the remedial response program is phased out over time. Retroactive liability should be repealed and the remedy selection process significantly reformed. States should be given the opportunity to be delegated implementation of the reformed federal Superfund program at NPL sites as well as provided with incentives to implement their own similarly reformed programs in a fair and cost-effective manner.
- OSTI ID:
- 124639
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-9503132-; TRN: IM9548%%229
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: 74. annual Gas Processors Association (GPA) meeting, San Antonio, TX (United States), 13-15 Mar 1995; Other Information: PBD: 1995; Related Information: Is Part Of Proceedings 74. annual convention Gas Processors Association, 1995; PB: 378 p.
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Superfund reauthorization: Another Congress and a new opportunity
Superfund reform: US Environmental Protection Agency`s 30-day study and its implication for the US Department of Energy