skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty quantification in application of the enrichment meter principle for nondestructive assay of special nuclear material

Journal Article · · Journal of Sensors
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/267462· OSTI ID:1222059
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria)
  2. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  3. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)

Nondestructive assay (NDA) of special nuclear material (SNM) is used in nonproliferation applications, including identification of SNM at border crossings, and quantifying SNM at safeguarded facilities. No assay method is complete without “error bars,” which provide one widely used way to express confidence in assay results. NDA specialists typically partition total uncertainty into “random” and “systematic” components so that, for example, an error bar can be developed for the SNM mass estimate in one item or for the total SNM mass estimate in multiple items. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) for NDA has always been important, but greater rigor is needed and achievable using modern statistical methods. To this end, we describe the extent to which the guideline for expressing uncertainty in measurements (GUM) can be used for NDA. Also, we describe possible extensions to the GUM by illustrating UQ challenges in NDA that it does not address, including calibration with errors in predictors, model error, and item-specific biases. Here, a case study is presented using gamma spectra and applying the enrichment meter principle to estimate the235U mass in an item. The case study illustrates how to update the ASTM international standard test method for application of the enrichment meter principle using gamma spectra.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830; AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
1222059
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1348309
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-109874; NN2001000
Journal Information:
Journal of Sensors, Vol. 2015, Issue 4; ISSN 1687-725X
Publisher:
HindawiCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 3 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (12)

Bayesian uncertainty analysis compared with the application of the GUM and its supplements journal July 2014
A study of the effect of measurement error in predictor variables in nondestructive assay journal November 2000
Revision of the ‘ Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ’. Why and how journal July 2014
Passive neutron detection for interdiction of nuclear material at borders
  • Kouzes, Richard T.; Siciliano, Edward R.; Ely, James H.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 584, Issue 2-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.10.026
journal January 2008
Statistical evaluation of FRAM γ-ray isotopic analysis data journal June 2005
Calibration of Nondestructive Assay Instruments: An Application of Linear Regression and Propagation of Variance journal January 2014
Multiple-component radiation-measurement error models journal March 2006
The effect of errors in the independent variables in linear regression journal August 1975
Least-squares fitting with errors in the response and predictor journal January 2012
Uncertainty calculations in the certification of reference materials. 1. Principles of analysis of variance journal December 2000
Exploring the Impact of Nuclear Data Uncertainties in Ultra-high Resolution Gamma Spectroscopy for Isotopic Analysis Using Approximate Bayesian Computation journal January 2015
Measurement Uncertainty and Probability journal March 2013