Verification as a Foundation for Validation of a Nuclear Fuel Performance Code
Complex multiphysics simulations such as nuclear fuel performance analysis are composed of many submodels used to describe specific phenomena. These phenomena include, as examples, the relationship between stress and strain, heat transfer across a gas gap, and mechanical contact. These submodels work in concert to simulate real-world events, like the behavior of a fuel rod in a reactor. If a simulation tool is able to represent real-world behavior, the tool is said to be validated. While much emphasis is rightly placed on validation, model verification may be undervalued. Verification involves showing that a model performs as intended, that it computes results consistent with its mathematical description. This paper explains the differences between verification and validation and shows how validation should be preceded by verification. Specific verification problems, including several specific to nuclear fuel analysis, are given. Validation results are also presented.
- Research Organization:
- Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- DOE - NE
- DOE Contract Number:
- DE-AC07-05ID14517
- OSTI ID:
- 1178051
- Report Number(s):
- INL/JOU-13-30943
- Journal Information:
- Annals of Nuclear Energy (Oxford), Vol. 71; ISSN 0306-4549
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Concepts of Model Verification and Validation
Verification and validation of the Alternative Nonlinear Two-phase Subchannel (ANTS) code