skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparative analysis of data collection methods for individualized modeling of radiologists' visual similarity judgments

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: We conducted an observer study to investigate how the data collection method affects the efficacy of modeling individual radiologists judgments regarding the perceptual similarity of breast masses on mammograms. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to the study. Six observers of variable experience levels in breast imaging were recruited to assess the perceptual similarity of mammographic masses. The observers subjective judgments were collected using: (i) a rating method, (ii) a preference method, and (iii) a hybrid method combining rating and ranking. Personalized user models were developed with the collected data to predict observers opinions. The relative efficacy of each data collection method was assessed based on the classification accuracy of the resulting user models. Results: The hybrid data collection method produced significantly more accurate individualized user models of perceptual opinions with comparable and sometimes better time efficiency than the other two data collection methods. The user models derived from hybrid data were clearly superior even when developed with a dramatically smaller number of training cases. Conclusions: A hybrid method combining rating and ranking is an intuitive and efficient way for collecting subjective similarity judgments to model human perceptual opinions with a higher accuracymore » than other more commonly used data collection methods.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. ORNL
  2. University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UTK)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program
OSTI Identifier:
1097477
DOE Contract Number:  
DE-AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Journal Name:
Academic Radiology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 20; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 1076-6332
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
breast imaging; mammography; observer variability; perception; visual similarity user modeling

Citation Formats

Tourassi, Georgia, Xu, Songhua, Yoon, Hong-Jun, Morin-Ducote, Garnetta, and Hudson, Kathy. Comparative analysis of data collection methods for individualized modeling of radiologists' visual similarity judgments. United States: N. p., 2013. Web. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2013.08.002.
Tourassi, Georgia, Xu, Songhua, Yoon, Hong-Jun, Morin-Ducote, Garnetta, & Hudson, Kathy. Comparative analysis of data collection methods for individualized modeling of radiologists' visual similarity judgments. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.08.002
Tourassi, Georgia, Xu, Songhua, Yoon, Hong-Jun, Morin-Ducote, Garnetta, and Hudson, Kathy. 2013. "Comparative analysis of data collection methods for individualized modeling of radiologists' visual similarity judgments". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.08.002.
@article{osti_1097477,
title = {Comparative analysis of data collection methods for individualized modeling of radiologists' visual similarity judgments},
author = {Tourassi, Georgia and Xu, Songhua and Yoon, Hong-Jun and Morin-Ducote, Garnetta and Hudson, Kathy},
abstractNote = {Rationale and Objectives: We conducted an observer study to investigate how the data collection method affects the efficacy of modeling individual radiologists judgments regarding the perceptual similarity of breast masses on mammograms. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to the study. Six observers of variable experience levels in breast imaging were recruited to assess the perceptual similarity of mammographic masses. The observers subjective judgments were collected using: (i) a rating method, (ii) a preference method, and (iii) a hybrid method combining rating and ranking. Personalized user models were developed with the collected data to predict observers opinions. The relative efficacy of each data collection method was assessed based on the classification accuracy of the resulting user models. Results: The hybrid data collection method produced significantly more accurate individualized user models of perceptual opinions with comparable and sometimes better time efficiency than the other two data collection methods. The user models derived from hybrid data were clearly superior even when developed with a dramatically smaller number of training cases. Conclusions: A hybrid method combining rating and ranking is an intuitive and efficient way for collecting subjective similarity judgments to model human perceptual opinions with a higher accuracy than other more commonly used data collection methods.},
doi = {10.1016/j.acra.2013.08.002},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1097477}, journal = {Academic Radiology},
issn = {1076-6332},
number = 11,
volume = 20,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013},
month = {Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013}
}