DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modeling the Transfer Function for the Dark Energy Survey

Abstract

We present a forward-modeling simulation framework designed to model the data products from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). This forward-model process can be thought of as a transfer function—a mapping from cosmological/astronomical signals to the final data products used by the scientists. Using output from the cosmological simulations (the Blind Cosmology Challenge), we generate simulated images (the Ultra Fast Image Simulator) and catalogs representative of the DES data. In this work we demonstrate the framework by simulating the 244 deg2 coadd images and catalogs in five bands for the DES Science Verification data. The simulation output is compared with the corresponding data to show that major characteristics of the images and catalogs can be captured. We also point out several directions of future improvements. Two practical examples—star-galaxy classification and proximity effects on object detection—are then used to illustrate how one can use the simulations to address systematics issues in data analysis. With clear understanding of the simplifications in our model, we show that one can use the simulations side-by-side with data products to interpret the measurements. This forward modeling approach is generally applicable for other upcoming and future surveys. It provides a powerful tool for systematics studies that is sufficientlymore » realistic and highly controllable.« less

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse, Zurich (Switzerland). et al.
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Org.:
DES Collaboration
OSTI Identifier:
1226302
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-14-479-AE
Journal ID: ISSN 1538-4357; arXiv eprint number arXiv:1411.0032
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-07CH11359
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
The Astrophysical Journal (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: The Astrophysical Journal (Online); Journal Volume: 801; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1538-4357
Publisher:
Institute of Physics (IOP)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; methods:data analysis; methods: numerical; surveys; techniques: image processing

Citation Formats

Chang, C. Modeling the Transfer Function for the Dark Energy Survey. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/73.
Chang, C. Modeling the Transfer Function for the Dark Energy Survey. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/73
Chang, C. Wed . "Modeling the Transfer Function for the Dark Energy Survey". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/73. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1226302.
@article{osti_1226302,
title = {Modeling the Transfer Function for the Dark Energy Survey},
author = {Chang, C.},
abstractNote = {We present a forward-modeling simulation framework designed to model the data products from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). This forward-model process can be thought of as a transfer function—a mapping from cosmological/astronomical signals to the final data products used by the scientists. Using output from the cosmological simulations (the Blind Cosmology Challenge), we generate simulated images (the Ultra Fast Image Simulator) and catalogs representative of the DES data. In this work we demonstrate the framework by simulating the 244 deg2 coadd images and catalogs in five bands for the DES Science Verification data. The simulation output is compared with the corresponding data to show that major characteristics of the images and catalogs can be captured. We also point out several directions of future improvements. Two practical examples—star-galaxy classification and proximity effects on object detection—are then used to illustrate how one can use the simulations to address systematics issues in data analysis. With clear understanding of the simplifications in our model, we show that one can use the simulations side-by-side with data products to interpret the measurements. This forward modeling approach is generally applicable for other upcoming and future surveys. It provides a powerful tool for systematics studies that is sufficiently realistic and highly controllable.},
doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/73},
journal = {The Astrophysical Journal (Online)},
number = 2,
volume = 801,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Mar 04 00:00:00 EST 2015},
month = {Wed Mar 04 00:00:00 EST 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 30 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

SExtractor: Software for source extraction
journal, June 1996

  • Bertin, E.; Arnouts, S.
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, Vol. 117, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1051/aas:1996164

A filament of dark matter between two clusters of galaxies
journal, July 2012

  • Dietrich, Jörg P.; Werner, Norbert; Clowe, Douglas
  • Nature, Vol. 487, Issue 7406
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11224

Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies
journal, June 1980

  • Kron, R. G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 43
  • DOI: 10.1086/190669

Metal cooling in simulations of cosmic structure formation
journal, April 2008


Mock galaxy catalogues using the quick particle mesh method
journal, November 2013

  • White, Martin; Tinker, Jeremy L.; McBride, Cameron K.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 437, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2071

Ray-tracing through the Millennium Simulation: Born corrections and lens-lens coupling in cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing
journal, March 2009


Magnificent Magnification: Exploiting the Other half of the Lensing Signal
journal, December 2013


The Dark Energy Survey and operations: Year 1
conference, August 2014

  • Diehl, H. T.; Abbott, T. M. C.; Annis, J.
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.2056982

Hyper Suprime-Cam
conference, October 2012

  • Miyazaki, Satoshi; Komiyama, Yutaka; Nakaya, Hidehiko
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.926844

sunglass: a new weak-lensing simulation pipeline: sunglass: a weak-lensing simulation pipeline
journal, May 2011


The Dark Energy Survey data processing and calibration system
conference, September 2012

  • Mohr, Joseph J.; Armstrong, Robert; Bertin, Emmanuel
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.926785

Improved mock Galaxy Catalogs for the Deep2 Galaxy Redshift Survey from Subhalo Abundance and Environment Matching
journal, August 2013

  • Gerke, Brian F.; Wechsler, Risa H.; Behroozi, Peter S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 208, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/1

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering
journal, June 2012

  • Ross, Ashley J.; Percival, Will J.; Sánchez, Ariel G.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 424, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21235.x

Moving mesh cosmology: numerical techniques and global statistics: Moving mesh cosmology
journal, September 2012

  • Vogelsberger, Mark; Sijacki, Debora; Kereš, Dušan
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 425, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21590.x

Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images
journal, July 2002

  • Peng, Chien Y.; Ho, Luis C.; Impey, Chris D.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 124, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/340952

Image analysis for cosmology: results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge: GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
journal, June 2012


calclens: weak lensing simulations for large-area sky surveys and second-order effects in cosmic shear power spectra
journal, August 2013

  • Becker, Matthew R.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 435, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1352

Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
journal, February 2006


An Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) for wide-field astronomy
journal, February 2013


Estimating the large-scale angular power spectrum in the presence of systematics: a case study of Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars
journal, September 2013

  • Leistedt, Boris; Peiris, Hiranya V.; Mortlock, Daniel J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 435, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1359

A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES AFFECTING THE STELLAR MASS-HALO MASS RELATION FOR 0 < z < 4
journal, June 2010


The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release
journal, September 2012


The dark Energy Survey: Prospects for Resolved Stellar Populations
journal, May 2011

  • Rossetto, Bruno M.; Santiago, Basílio X.; Girardi, Léo
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 141, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/6/185

Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
journal, September 2008


Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix
journal, November 2008


The Advanced Camera for Surveys General Catalog: Structural Parameters for Approximately half a Million Galaxies
journal, May 2012

  • Griffith, Roger L.; Cooper, Michael C.; Newman, Jeffrey A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 200, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/200/1/9

Designing future dark energy space missions: I. Building realistic galaxy spectro-photometric catalogs and their first applications
journal, July 2009


A Bayesian approach to star-galaxy classification: Bayesian star-galaxy classification
journal, February 2011


Star-Galaxy Classification in Multi-Band Optical Imaging
journal, October 2012


Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
journal, September 2011


The large area KX quasar catalogue - I. Analysis of the photometric redshift selection and the complete quasar catalogue: The large area KX quasar catalogue
journal, July 2012


Characterizing unknown systematics in large scale structure surveys
journal, April 2014

  • Agarwal, Nishant; Ho, Shirley; Myers, Adam D.
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 04
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/007

Geant4—a simulation toolkit
journal, July 2003

  • Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 506, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

Modeling Luminosity‐dependent Galaxy Clustering through Cosmic Time
journal, August 2006

  • Conroy, Charlie; Wechsler, Risa H.; Kravtsov, Andrey V.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 647, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/503602

Simulating the LSST system
conference, July 2010

  • Connolly, A. J.; Peterson, John; Jernigan, J. Garrett
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.857819

Weak lensing, dark matter and dark energy
journal, July 2010


New York University Value-Added Galaxy Catalog: A Galaxy Catalog Based on New Public Surveys
journal, June 2005

  • Blanton, Michael R.; Schlegel, David J.; Strauss, Michael A.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 129, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1086/429803

Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: a hybrid multiphase model for star formation
journal, February 2003


Works referencing / citing this record:

Characterization and photometric performance of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Software Pipeline
journal, December 2017

  • Huang, Song; Leauthaud, Alexie; Murata, Ryoma
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 70, Issue SP1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx126

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
journal, April 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, E. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 235, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5

Apples to apples A 2 – I. Realistic galaxy simulated catalogues and photometric redshift predictions for next-generation surveys
journal, August 2015

  • Ascaso, B.; Mei, S.; Benítez, N.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 453, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1597

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: validation of weak lensing cluster member contamination estimates from P(z) decomposition
journal, August 2019

  • Varga, T. N.; DeRose, J.; Gruen, D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2185

The OTELO survey: I. Description, data reduction, and multi-wavelength catalogue
journal, October 2019

  • Bongiovanni, Ángel; Ramón-Pérez, Marina; Pérez García, Ana María
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 631
  • DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833294

Galaxies in X-ray selected clusters and groups in Dark Energy Survey data – II. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of the red-sequence galaxy luminosity function
journal, June 2019

  • Zhang, Y.; Miller, C. J.; Rooney, P.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1612

Weak lensing magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, February 2018

  • Garcia-Fernandez, M.; Sanchez, E.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty282

The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1
text, January 2018

  • Abbott, Tmc; Abdalla, Fb; Allam, S.
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.37745

The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

  • Rykoff, E. S.; Rozo, E.; Hollowood, D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 224, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/1

Galaxy cluster mass estimation from stacked spectroscopic analysis
journal, May 2016

  • Farahi, Arya; Evrard, August E.; Rozo, Eduardo
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 460, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1143

The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1
journal, November 2018

  • Abbott, T. M. C.; Abdalla, F. B.; Allam, S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 239, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0

No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey
journal, January 2016

  • Suchyta, E.; Huff, E. M.; Aleksić, J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 457, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2953

Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data
journal, December 2015

  • Crocce, M.; Carretero, J.; Bauer, A. H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 455, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2590

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, Es
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.21145

Characterization and Photometric Performance of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Software Pipeline
text, January 2017


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2017


The OTELO survey. I. Description, data reduction, and multi-wavelength catalogue
text, January 2020