DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines

Abstract

The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans (the Million-Worker study) is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time, and not acutely as was the case for Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiological study is cancer mortality but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide unbiased estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses and their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the Million-Worker study are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 years. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, DOE workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma-ray or x-ray sources, for certain of the study groups there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes thatmore » require internal radiation dosimetry measures. Scientific Committee 6-9 has been established by NCRP to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the Million-Worker study. The Committee’s report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Reports 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the various components of the Million-Worker study to make sure that certain dosimetry criteria are respected: calculation of annual absorbed doses in the organs of interest, separation of low-LET and high-LET components, evaluation of uncertainties, and quality assurance and quality control. Lastly, we recognize that the Million-Worker study and its approaches to dosimetry are a work in progress and that there will be flexibility and changes in direction as new information is obtained, both with regard to dosimetry and with regard to the epidemiologic features of the study components.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [6];  [8];  [9];  [9];  [10];  [3];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [14];  [15];  [16]
  1. National Cancer Inst., Rockville, MD (United States)
  2. M. H. Chew & Associates, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  3. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD (United States)
  4. New York, NY (United States)
  5. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (United States)
  6. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  7. Oak Ridge Associated Univ., Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  8. International Epidemiology Inst., Rockville, MD (United States)
  9. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  10. Clarksburg, MD (United States)
  11. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Washington, DC (United States)
  12. Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)
  13. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Arlington, TX (United States)
  14. Risk Assessment Corporation, Neeses, SC (United States)
  15. Landauer, Inc., Glenwood, IL (United States)
  16. Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; USEPA; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
OSTI Identifier:
1221454
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-104885
Journal ID: ISSN 0017-9078; HU2006300
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; SC0008944; U01 CA137026
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Health Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 108; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0017-9078
Publisher:
Health Physics Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; 62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; dose reconstruction; occupational exposures; radiation workers; Million Worker Study

Citation Formats

Bouville, André, Toohey, Richard E., Boice, John D., Beck, Harold L., Dauer, Larry T., Eckerman, Keith F., Hagemeyer, Derek, Leggett, Richard W., Mumma, Michael T., Napier, Bruce, Pryor, Kathy H., Rosenstein, Marvin, Schauer, David A., Sherbini, Sami, Stram, Daniel O., Thompson, James L., Till, John E., Yoder, Craig, and Zeitlin, Cary. Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000000231.
Bouville, André, Toohey, Richard E., Boice, John D., Beck, Harold L., Dauer, Larry T., Eckerman, Keith F., Hagemeyer, Derek, Leggett, Richard W., Mumma, Michael T., Napier, Bruce, Pryor, Kathy H., Rosenstein, Marvin, Schauer, David A., Sherbini, Sami, Stram, Daniel O., Thompson, James L., Till, John E., Yoder, Craig, & Zeitlin, Cary. Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines. United States. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000231
Bouville, André, Toohey, Richard E., Boice, John D., Beck, Harold L., Dauer, Larry T., Eckerman, Keith F., Hagemeyer, Derek, Leggett, Richard W., Mumma, Michael T., Napier, Bruce, Pryor, Kathy H., Rosenstein, Marvin, Schauer, David A., Sherbini, Sami, Stram, Daniel O., Thompson, James L., Till, John E., Yoder, Craig, and Zeitlin, Cary. Sun . "Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines". United States. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000231. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1221454.
@article{osti_1221454,
title = {Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines},
author = {Bouville, André and Toohey, Richard E. and Boice, John D. and Beck, Harold L. and Dauer, Larry T. and Eckerman, Keith F. and Hagemeyer, Derek and Leggett, Richard W. and Mumma, Michael T. and Napier, Bruce and Pryor, Kathy H. and Rosenstein, Marvin and Schauer, David A. and Sherbini, Sami and Stram, Daniel O. and Thompson, James L. and Till, John E. and Yoder, Craig and Zeitlin, Cary},
abstractNote = {The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans (the Million-Worker study) is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time, and not acutely as was the case for Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiological study is cancer mortality but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide unbiased estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses and their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the Million-Worker study are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 years. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, DOE workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma-ray or x-ray sources, for certain of the study groups there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that require internal radiation dosimetry measures. Scientific Committee 6-9 has been established by NCRP to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the Million-Worker study. The Committee’s report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Reports 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the various components of the Million-Worker study to make sure that certain dosimetry criteria are respected: calculation of annual absorbed doses in the organs of interest, separation of low-LET and high-LET components, evaluation of uncertainties, and quality assurance and quality control. Lastly, we recognize that the Million-Worker study and its approaches to dosimetry are a work in progress and that there will be flexibility and changes in direction as new information is obtained, both with regard to dosimetry and with regard to the epidemiologic features of the study components.},
doi = {10.1097/HP.0000000000000231},
journal = {Health Physics},
number = 2,
volume = 108,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2015},
month = {Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 56 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Space radiation dosimetry in low-Earth orbit and beyond
journal, September 2001

  • Benton, E. R.; Benton, E. V.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vol. 184, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00748-0

Radiation Exposure of U.S. Military Individuals
journal, January 2014


Radiation Protection at u.s. Nuclear Power Plants—Today and Tomorrow
journal, January 2011


The importance of radiation worker studies
journal, August 2014


A Comprehensive dose Reconstruction Methodology for Former Rocketdyne/Atomics International Radiation Workers
journal, January 2006


Updated Mortality Analysis of Radiation Workers at Rocketdyne (Atomics International), 1948–2008
journal, August 2011

  • Boice, John D.; Cohen, Sarah S.; Mumma, Michael T.
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 176, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1667/RR2487.1

Mortality Among Mound Workers Exposed to Polonium-210 and Other Sources of Radiation, 1944–1979
journal, February 2014

  • Boice, John D.; Cohen, Sarah S.; Mumma, Michael T.
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 181, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1667/RR13395.1

Using the Whole Cohort in the Analysis of Case-Cohort Data
journal, April 2009

  • Breslow, N. E.; Lumley, T.; Ballantyne, C. M.
  • American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 169, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp055

How Safe Is Safe Enough? Radiation Risk for a Human Mission to Mars
journal, October 2013


Space Radiation Risks for Astronauts on Multiple International Space Station Missions
journal, April 2014


Space radiation risks to the central nervous system
journal, July 2014


External Radiation Exposure and Mortality in a Cohort of Uranium Processing Workers
journal, July 2000

  • Dupree-Ellis, Elizabeth; Watkins, Janice; Ingle, J. Nicholas
  • American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 152, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/aje/152.1.91

A Study of Mortality and Morbidity Among Persons Occupationally Exposed to ⩽50 mSv in a Year: Phase I, Mortality Through 1984
journal, April 1996


An Approach to Evaluating Bias and Uncertainty in Estimates of External Dose Obtained from Personal Dosimeters
journal, January 1996


Lung Cancer Risks from Plutonium: An Updated Analysis of Data from the Mayak Worker Cohort
journal, February 2013

  • Gilbert, E. S.; Sokolnikov, M. E.; Preston, D. L.
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 179, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1667/RR3054.1

Suitability of Chinese Oil Well Loggers for an Epidemiologic Study of the Carcinogenic Effects of Neutrons
journal, January 1991


Mayak Worker Dosimetry System 2008 (MWDS-2008): Assessment of Internal Dose from Measurement Results of Plutonium Activity in Urine
journal, January 2013

  • Khokhryakov, Victor V.; Khokhryakov, Valentin F.; Suslova, Klara G.
  • Health Physics, Vol. 104, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31827dbf60

A respiratory model for uranium aluminide based on occupational data
journal, December 2005

  • Leggett, R. W.; Eckerman, K. F.; Boice, J. D.
  • Journal of Radiological Protection, Vol. 25, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/25/4/004

Shared Uncertainty in Measurement Error Problems, with Application to Nevada Test Site Fallout Data
journal, May 2007


Nuclear reactor accidents: preparedness and medical consequences
journal, December 1987


Solar energetic particles: A paradigm shift
journal, January 1995


Estimating Historical Radiation Doses to a Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists
journal, July 2006

  • Simon, Steven L.; Weinstock, Robert M.; Doody, Michele Morin
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 166, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1667/RR3433.1

Radiation Organ Doses Received in a Nationwide Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists: Methods and Findings
journal, November 2014

  • Simon, Steven L.; Preston, Dale L.; Linet, Martha S.
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 182, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1667/RR13542.1

Elemental and Isotopic Composition of the Galactic Cosmic Rays
journal, December 1983


Mayak film Dosimeter Response Studies, part ii: Response Models
journal, January 2007


Mayak film Dosimeter Response Studies, part iii: Application to Worker dose Assessment
journal, January 2007


FISH Chromosome Aberration Analysis on Retired Radiation Workers from the Sellafield Nuclear Facility
journal, September 2004

  • Tawn, E. Janet; Whitehouse, Caroline A.; Tarone, Robert E.
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 162, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1667/RR3214

Military Participants at U.S. Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing—Methodology for Estimating Dose and Uncertainty
journal, May 2014

  • Till, John E.; Beck, Harold L.; Aanenson, Jill W.
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 181, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1667/RR13597.1

Mayak Worker Dosimetry Study: an Overview
journal, January 2007


Mayak film Dosimeter Response Studies, part i: Measurements
journal, January 2007


The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate
journal, March 2010


Cancer mortality risk among military participants of a 1958 atmospheric nuclear weapons test.
journal, April 1995

  • Watanabe, K. K.; Kang, H. K.; Dalager, N. A.
  • American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 85, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.85.4.523

Works referencing / citing this record:

The Million Person Study, whence it came and why
journal, April 2019


Dosimetry associated with veterans who participated in nuclear weapons testing
journal, January 2019


Evaluation of statistical modeling approaches for epidemiologic studies of low-dose radiation health effects
journal, January 2019


Dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Report No. 178
journal, November 2018


Updated mortality analysis of the Mallinckrodt uranium processing workers, 1942–2012
journal, February 2019


Retrospective cohort study and biobanking of patients treated for hemangioma in childhood – telomeres as biomarker of aging and radiation exposure
journal, January 2017

  • Frenzel, Monika; Ricoul, Michelle; Benadjaoud, Mohamed Amine
  • International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 93, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1337278

The Million Person Study relevance to space exploration and mars
journal, April 2019


Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection
journal, August 2018

  • Shore, R. E.; Beck, H. L.; Boice, J. D.
  • Journal of Radiological Protection, Vol. 38, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aad348

Historical perspective on the department of energy mortality studies: focus on the collection and storage of individual worker data
journal, January 2019


What does radiation biology tell us about potential health effects at low dose and low dose rates?
journal, September 2019


Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers
journal, April 2016


Evaluation of statistical modeling approaches for epidemiologic studies of low dose radiation health effects
text, January 2018