Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients
Abstract
With this study, precision weak gravitational lensing experiments require measurements of galaxy shapes accurate to <1 part in 1000. We investigate measurement biases, noted by Voigt and Bridle (2009) and Melchior et al. (2009), that are common to shape measurement methodologies that rely upon fitting elliptical-isophote galaxy models to observed data. The first bias arises when the true galaxy shapes do not match the models being fit. We show that this "underfitting bias" is due, at root, to these methods' attempts to use information at high spatial frequencies that has been destroyed by the convolution with the point-spread function (PSF) and/or by sampling. We propose a new shape-measurement technique that is explicitly confined to observable regions of k-space. A second bias arises for galaxies whose ellipticity varies with radius. For most shape-measurement methods, such galaxies are subject to "ellipticity gradient bias". We show how to reduce such biases by factors of 20–100 within the new shape-measurement method. The resulting shear estimator has multiplicative errors < 1 part in 103 for high-S/N images, even for highly asymmetric galaxies. Without any training or recalibration, the new method obtains Q = 3000 in the GREAT08 Challenge of blind shear reconstruction on low-noise galaxies,more »
- Authors:
-
- Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1203556
- Grant/Contract Number:
- FG02-95ER40893
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 406; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
- Publisher:
- Royal Astronomical Society
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; measurement biases; gravitational lensing; data analysis
Citation Formats
Bernstein, Gary M. Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients. United States: N. p., 2010.
Web. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x.
Bernstein, Gary M. Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients. United States. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x
Bernstein, Gary M. Sat .
"Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients". United States. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1203556.
@article{osti_1203556,
title = {Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients},
author = {Bernstein, Gary M.},
abstractNote = {With this study, precision weak gravitational lensing experiments require measurements of galaxy shapes accurate to <1 part in 1000. We investigate measurement biases, noted by Voigt and Bridle (2009) and Melchior et al. (2009), that are common to shape measurement methodologies that rely upon fitting elliptical-isophote galaxy models to observed data. The first bias arises when the true galaxy shapes do not match the models being fit. We show that this "underfitting bias" is due, at root, to these methods' attempts to use information at high spatial frequencies that has been destroyed by the convolution with the point-spread function (PSF) and/or by sampling. We propose a new shape-measurement technique that is explicitly confined to observable regions of k-space. A second bias arises for galaxies whose ellipticity varies with radius. For most shape-measurement methods, such galaxies are subject to "ellipticity gradient bias". We show how to reduce such biases by factors of 20–100 within the new shape-measurement method. The resulting shear estimator has multiplicative errors < 1 part in 103 for high-S/N images, even for highly asymmetric galaxies. Without any training or recalibration, the new method obtains Q = 3000 in the GREAT08 Challenge of blind shear reconstruction on low-noise galaxies, several times better than any previous method.},
doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 4,
volume = 406,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Aug 21 00:00:00 EDT 2010},
month = {Sat Aug 21 00:00:00 EDT 2010}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Report of the Dark Energy Task Force
report, September 2006
- Albrecht, Andreas; Bernstein, Gary; Cahn, Robert
Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix
journal, November 2008
- Amara, Adam; Réfrégier, Alexandre
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 391, Issue 1
Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
journal, February 2002
- Bernstein, G. M.; Jarvis, M.
- The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 123, Issue 2
Modal decomposition of astronomical images with application to shapelets
journal, October 2004
- Berry, R. H.; Hobson, M. P.; Withington, S.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 354, Issue 1
Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
journal, March 2009
- Bridle, Sarah; Shawe-Taylor, John; Amara, Adam
- The Annals of Applied Statistics, Vol. 3, Issue 1
The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
journal, April 2006
- Heymans, Catherine; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Bacon, David
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 368, Issue 3
Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications
journal, November 2008
- Hoekstra, Henk; Jain, Bhuvnesh
- Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, Vol. 58, Issue 1
Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
journal, February 2006
- Huterer, D.; Takada, M.; Bernstein, G.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 366, Issue 1
A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
journal, August 1995
- Kaiser, Nick; Squires, Gordon; Broadhurst, Tom
- The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 449
Galaxy shear estimation from stacked images
journal, September 2009
- Lewis, Antony
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 398, Issue 1
Limitations on shapelet-based weak-lensing measurements
journal, February 2010
- Melchior, P.; Böhnert, A.; Lombardi, M.
- Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 510
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - I. Methodology and a fast-fitting algorithm
journal, November 2007
- Miller, L.; Kitching, T. D.; Heymans, C.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 382, Issue 1
Shear Recovery Accuracy in Weak-Lensing Analysis with the Elliptical Gauss-Laguerre Method
journal, March 2007
- Nakajima, Reiko; Bernstein, Gary
- The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 133, Issue 4
Sérsiclets - a matched filter extension of Shapelets for weak lensing studies
journal, June 2009
- Ngan, W.; Van Waerbeke, L.; Mahdavi, A.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 396, Issue 2
Shapelets -- II. A method for weak lensing measurements
journal, January 2003
- Refregier, A.; Bacon, D.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 338, Issue 1
Measuring the cosmic shear in Fourier space: Measuring the cosmic shear in Fourier space
journal, December 2007
- Zhang, Jun
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 383, Issue 1
Works referencing / citing this record:
Masses of Galaxy Clusters from Gravitational Lensing
journal, April 2013
- Hoekstra, Henk; Bartelmann, Matthias; Dahle, Håkon
- Space Science Reviews, Vol. 177, Issue 1-4
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
journal, July 2015
- Kilbinger, Martin
- Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 78, Issue 8
The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (Great3) Challenge Handbook
journal, April 2014
- Mandelbaum, Rachel; Rowe, Barnaby; Bosch, James
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 212, Issue 1
Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
journal, December 2012
- Massey, Richard; Hoekstra, Henk; Kitching, Thomas
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 429, Issue 1
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys – III. Application to the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
journal, January 2013
- Miller, L.; Heymans, C.; Kitching, T. D.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 429, Issue 4
im3shape: a maximum likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing
journal, July 2013
- Zuntz, Joe; Kacprzak, Tomasz; Voigt, Lisa
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 434, Issue 2
The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses★
journal, March 2015
- Hoekstra, Henk; Herbonnet, Ricardo; Muzzin, Adam
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 449, Issue 1
Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, August 2016
- Kacprzak, T.; Kirk, D.; Friedrich, O.
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 463, Issue 4
An accurate and practical method for inference of weak gravitational lensing from galaxy images
journal, April 2016
- Bernstein, Gary M.; Armstrong, Robert; Krawiec, Christina
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 459, Issue 4
Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey
journal, September 2018
- Mandelbaum, Rachel; Lanusse, François; Leauthaud, Alexie
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 3
Fourier Power Function Shapelets (FPFS) shear estimator: performance on image simulations
journal, October 2018
- Li, Xiangchong; Katayama, Nobuhiko; Oguri, Masamune
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 4
Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
journal, May 2017
- Sheldon, Erin S.; Huff, Eric M.
- The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 841, Issue 1
New constraints on the evolution of the stellar-to-dark matter connection: A combined analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing, clustering, and stellar mass functions from z=0.2 to z=1
text, January 2012
- Alexie, Leauthaud,; Jeremy, Tinker,; al, et
- IOP Publishing
Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
text, January 2012
- Massey, Richard; Hoekstra, Henk; Kitching, Thomas
- arXiv
Bayesian Galaxy Shape Measurement for Weak Lensing Surveys - III. Application to the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
text, January 2012
- Miller, L.; Heymans, C.; Kitching, T. D.
- arXiv
Masses of galaxy clusters from gravitational lensing
text, January 2013
- Hoekstra, Henk; Bartelmann, Matthias; Dahle, Haakon
- arXiv
The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (GREAT3) Challenge Handbook
text, January 2013
- Mandelbaum, Rachel; Rowe, Barnaby; Bosch, James
- arXiv
An accurate and practical method for inference of weak gravitational lensing from galaxy images
text, January 2015
- Bernstein, Gary M.; Armstrong, Robert; Krawiec, Christina
- arXiv
Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
text, January 2016
- Kacprzak, T.; Kirk, D.; Friedrich, O.
- arXiv
Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
text, January 2017
- Sheldon, Erin S.; Huff, Eric M.
- arXiv