DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology

Abstract

We propose that the quantitative cancer biology community makes a concerted effort to apply lessons from weather forecasting to develop an analogous methodology for predicting and evaluating tumor growth and treatment response. Currently, the time course of tumor response is not predicted; instead, response is only assessed post hoc by physical examination or imaging methods. This fundamental practice within clinical oncology limits optimization of a treatment regimen for an individual patient, as well as to determine in real time whether the choice was in fact appropriate. This is especially frustrating at a time when a panoply of molecularly targeted therapies is available, and precision genetic or proteomic analyses of tumors are an established reality. By learning from the methods of weather and climate modeling, we submit that the forecasting power of biophysical and biomathematical modeling can be harnessed to hasten the arrival of a field of predictive oncology. Furthermore, with a successful methodology toward tumor forecasting, it should be possible to integrate large tumor-specific datasets of varied types and effectively defeat one cancer patient at a time.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN (United States). Inst. of Imaging Science; Dept. of Radiology and Radiological Sciences; Dept. of Biomedical Engineering; Dept. of Physics and Astronomy; Dept. of Cancer Biology; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
  2. Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN (United States). Dept. of Cancer Biology; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Computer Science and Mathematics Division
  4. Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN (United States). Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1185639
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Cancer Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 75; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 0008-5472
Publisher:
American Association for Cancer Research
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; nonlinear models of tumor growth; analogies to weather and climate forecasting

Citation Formats

Yankeelov, Thomas E., Quaranta, Vito, Evans, Katherine J., and Rericha, Erin C. Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2233.
Yankeelov, Thomas E., Quaranta, Vito, Evans, Katherine J., & Rericha, Erin C. Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology. United States. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2233
Yankeelov, Thomas E., Quaranta, Vito, Evans, Katherine J., and Rericha, Erin C. Sun . "Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology". United States. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2233. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1185639.
@article{osti_1185639,
title = {Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology},
author = {Yankeelov, Thomas E. and Quaranta, Vito and Evans, Katherine J. and Rericha, Erin C.},
abstractNote = {We propose that the quantitative cancer biology community makes a concerted effort to apply lessons from weather forecasting to develop an analogous methodology for predicting and evaluating tumor growth and treatment response. Currently, the time course of tumor response is not predicted; instead, response is only assessed post hoc by physical examination or imaging methods. This fundamental practice within clinical oncology limits optimization of a treatment regimen for an individual patient, as well as to determine in real time whether the choice was in fact appropriate. This is especially frustrating at a time when a panoply of molecularly targeted therapies is available, and precision genetic or proteomic analyses of tumors are an established reality. By learning from the methods of weather and climate modeling, we submit that the forecasting power of biophysical and biomathematical modeling can be harnessed to hasten the arrival of a field of predictive oncology. Furthermore, with a successful methodology toward tumor forecasting, it should be possible to integrate large tumor-specific datasets of varied types and effectively defeat one cancer patient at a time.},
doi = {10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2233},
journal = {Cancer Research},
number = 6,
volume = 75,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Sun Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 53 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referencing / citing this record:

Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology
journal, March 2019

  • Hormuth, David A.; Sorace, Anna G.; Virostko, John
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 50, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26731

Agent-Based Modeling of Cancer Stem Cell Driven Solid Tumor Growth
book, January 2016


Multi-scale Modeling in Clinical Oncology: Opportunities and Barriers to Success
journal, July 2016

  • Yankeelov, Thomas E.; An, Gary; Saut, Oliver
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 44, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1691-6

Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI
journal, April 2019

  • Hormuth, David A.; Jarrett, Angela M.; Feng, Xinzeng
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 47, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02262-9

Predicting Patient-Specific Radiotherapy Protocols Based on Mathematical Model Choice for Proliferation Saturation Index
journal, July 2017

  • Poleszczuk, Jan; Walker, Rachel; Moros, Eduardo G.
  • Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Vol. 80, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11538-017-0279-0

The mathematics of cancer: integrating quantitative models
journal, November 2015

  • Altrock, Philipp M.; Liu, Lin L.; Michor, Franziska
  • Nature Reviews Cancer, Vol. 15, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1038/nrc4029

Experimentally-driven mathematical modeling to improve combination targeted and cytotoxic therapy for HER2+ breast cancer
journal, September 2019


Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: A review of the literature
journal, October 2018

  • Jarrett, Angela M.; Lima, Ernesto A. B. F.; Hormuth, David A.
  • Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, Vol. 18, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1527689

The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap
journal, June 2019

  • Rockne, Russell C.; Hawkins-Daarud, Andrea; Swanson, Kristin R.
  • Physical Biology, Vol. 16, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/ab1a09

Mathematical modelling of trastuzumab-induced immune response in an in vivo murine model of HER2+ breast cancer
journal, September 2018

  • Jarrett, Angela M.; Bloom, Meghan J.; Godfrey, Wesley
  • Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA, Vol. 36, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/imammb/dqy014

When, why and how clonal diversity predicts future tumour growth
posted_content, December 2019


Agent-based modeling of cancer stem cell driven solid tumor growth
journal, December 2015

  • Poleszczuk, Jan T.; Macklin, Paul; Enderling, Heiko
  • Methods In Molecular Biology
  • DOI: 10.1101/035162