DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Direct observation of the redistribution of sulfur and polysufides in Li-S batteries during first cycle by in situ X-Ray fluorescence microscopy

Abstract

The demands on low cost and high energy density rechargeable batteries for both transportation and large-scale stationary energy storage are stimulating more and more research toward new battery systems. Since sulfur is an earth-abundant material with low cost, research on the high energy density Li–S batteries (2600 W h kg⁻¹) are getting more and more attention. The reactions between sulfur and lithium during charge–discharge cycling are quite complicated, going through multiple electron transfer process associated with chemical and electrochemical equilibrium between long- and short-chain polysulfide Li₂Sx intermediates (1 < x ≤ 8). It is reported that the long-chain polysulfides can be dissolved into electrolyte with aprotic organic solvents and migrated to the Li anode side. This so-called “shuttle effect” is believed to be the main reason for capacity loss and low columbic efficiency of the Li–S batteries. In the past few years, a great deal of efforts have been made on how to overcome the problem of polysulfide dissolution through new sulfur electrode construction and cell designs, as well as the modification of the electrolyte. Although it has been reported by several publications that some Li–S cells can sustain more than a thousand cycles based on the thin film electrodemore » configurations, the long-term cycling stability is still one of the major barriers for the real application of Li–S batteries. More in-depth studies on the fundamental understanding of the sulfur reaction mechanism and interactions among the different polysulfide species, the electrolyte and the electrodes are still greatly needed. Various in situ techniques have been developed and applied to study the mechanism of the sulfur chemistry in Li–S batteries during electrochemical cycling, such as transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV–visible spectroscopy, and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The applications of these characterization techniques have demonstrated their power in probing the structure changes, morphology evolutions, and coordination of sulfur and polysulfides with the electrolyte in Li–S cells, providing complementary information to each other thus enhancing the understanding in Li–S battery systems. In this communication, in situ X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscopy was combined with XAS to directly probe the morphology changes of Li–S batteries during first cycle. The morphology changes of the sulfur electrode and the redistribution of sulfur and polysulfides were monitored in real time through the XRF images, while the changes of the sulfur containing compounds were characterized through the XAS spectra simultaneously. In contrast to other studies using ex situ or single characterization technique as reported in the literatures, the in situ technique used in this work has the unique feature of probing the Li–S cell under operating conditions, as well as the combination of XRF imaging with spectroscopy data. By doing this, the morphology evolution and redistribution of specific sulfur particles during cycling can be tracked and identified at certain locations in a real time. In addition, this technique allows us to select the field-of-view (FOV) area from micrometer to centimeter size, providing the capability to study the Li–S reactions not just at the material level, but also at the electrode level. This is very important for both understanding Li–S chemistry and designing effective strategies for Li–S batteries.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [1];  [3];  [4];  [2];  [5];  [1]
  1. Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, Richland, WA (United States)
  3. Dongguk University-Seoul, Department of Energy and Materials Engineering, (Republic of Korea)
  4. Univ. of Massachusetts at Boston, Dept. of Chemistry, MA (United States)
  5. Argonne National Laboratory, X-ray Science Division, Lemont, IL (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1177848
Report Number(s):
BNL-107699-2015-JA
Journal ID: ISSN 1614-6832; R&D Project: MA453MAEA; VT1201000
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC00112704
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Advanced Energy Materials
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 5; Journal Issue: 16; Journal ID: ISSN 1614-6832
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
25 ENERGY STORAGE; energy storage; in situ techniques; lithium–sulfur batteries; microspectroscopy; reaction mechanism

Citation Formats

Yu, Xiquian, Pan, Huilin, Zhou, Yongning, Northrup, Paul, Xiao, Jie, Bak, Seongmin, Liu, Mingzhao, Nam, Kyung-Wan, Qu, Deyang, Liu, Jun, Wu, Tianpin, and Yang, Xiao-Qing. Direct observation of the redistribution of sulfur and polysufides in Li-S batteries during first cycle by in situ X-Ray fluorescence microscopy. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1002/aenm.201500072.
Yu, Xiquian, Pan, Huilin, Zhou, Yongning, Northrup, Paul, Xiao, Jie, Bak, Seongmin, Liu, Mingzhao, Nam, Kyung-Wan, Qu, Deyang, Liu, Jun, Wu, Tianpin, & Yang, Xiao-Qing. Direct observation of the redistribution of sulfur and polysufides in Li-S batteries during first cycle by in situ X-Ray fluorescence microscopy. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500072
Yu, Xiquian, Pan, Huilin, Zhou, Yongning, Northrup, Paul, Xiao, Jie, Bak, Seongmin, Liu, Mingzhao, Nam, Kyung-Wan, Qu, Deyang, Liu, Jun, Wu, Tianpin, and Yang, Xiao-Qing. Wed . "Direct observation of the redistribution of sulfur and polysufides in Li-S batteries during first cycle by in situ X-Ray fluorescence microscopy". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500072. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1177848.
@article{osti_1177848,
title = {Direct observation of the redistribution of sulfur and polysufides in Li-S batteries during first cycle by in situ X-Ray fluorescence microscopy},
author = {Yu, Xiquian and Pan, Huilin and Zhou, Yongning and Northrup, Paul and Xiao, Jie and Bak, Seongmin and Liu, Mingzhao and Nam, Kyung-Wan and Qu, Deyang and Liu, Jun and Wu, Tianpin and Yang, Xiao-Qing},
abstractNote = {The demands on low cost and high energy density rechargeable batteries for both transportation and large-scale stationary energy storage are stimulating more and more research toward new battery systems. Since sulfur is an earth-abundant material with low cost, research on the high energy density Li–S batteries (2600 W h kg⁻¹) are getting more and more attention. The reactions between sulfur and lithium during charge–discharge cycling are quite complicated, going through multiple electron transfer process associated with chemical and electrochemical equilibrium between long- and short-chain polysulfide Li₂Sx intermediates (1 < x ≤ 8). It is reported that the long-chain polysulfides can be dissolved into electrolyte with aprotic organic solvents and migrated to the Li anode side. This so-called “shuttle effect” is believed to be the main reason for capacity loss and low columbic efficiency of the Li–S batteries. In the past few years, a great deal of efforts have been made on how to overcome the problem of polysulfide dissolution through new sulfur electrode construction and cell designs, as well as the modification of the electrolyte. Although it has been reported by several publications that some Li–S cells can sustain more than a thousand cycles based on the thin film electrode configurations, the long-term cycling stability is still one of the major barriers for the real application of Li–S batteries. More in-depth studies on the fundamental understanding of the sulfur reaction mechanism and interactions among the different polysulfide species, the electrolyte and the electrodes are still greatly needed. Various in situ techniques have been developed and applied to study the mechanism of the sulfur chemistry in Li–S batteries during electrochemical cycling, such as transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV–visible spectroscopy, and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The applications of these characterization techniques have demonstrated their power in probing the structure changes, morphology evolutions, and coordination of sulfur and polysulfides with the electrolyte in Li–S cells, providing complementary information to each other thus enhancing the understanding in Li–S battery systems. In this communication, in situ X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscopy was combined with XAS to directly probe the morphology changes of Li–S batteries during first cycle. The morphology changes of the sulfur electrode and the redistribution of sulfur and polysulfides were monitored in real time through the XRF images, while the changes of the sulfur containing compounds were characterized through the XAS spectra simultaneously. In contrast to other studies using ex situ or single characterization technique as reported in the literatures, the in situ technique used in this work has the unique feature of probing the Li–S cell under operating conditions, as well as the combination of XRF imaging with spectroscopy data. By doing this, the morphology evolution and redistribution of specific sulfur particles during cycling can be tracked and identified at certain locations in a real time. In addition, this technique allows us to select the field-of-view (FOV) area from micrometer to centimeter size, providing the capability to study the Li–S reactions not just at the material level, but also at the electrode level. This is very important for both understanding Li–S chemistry and designing effective strategies for Li–S batteries.},
doi = {10.1002/aenm.201500072},
journal = {Advanced Energy Materials},
number = 16,
volume = 5,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Mar 25 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Wed Mar 25 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 67 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices
journal, November 2011


Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage
journal, January 2012

  • Bruce, Peter G.; Freunberger, Stefan A.; Hardwick, Laurence J.
  • Nature Materials, Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 19-29
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmat3191

Materials Science and Materials Chemistry for Large Scale Electrochemical Energy Storage: From Transportation to Electrical Grid
journal, June 2012

  • Liu, Jun; Zhang, Ji-Guang; Yang, Zhenguo
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 23, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201200690

Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for large-scale electric energy storage
journal, January 2013

  • Pan, Huilin; Hu, Yong-Sheng; Chen, Liquan
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 6, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/c3ee40847g

A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries
journal, May 2009

  • Ji, Xiulei; Lee, Kyu Tae; Nazar, Linda F.
  • Nature Materials, Vol. 8, Issue 6, p. 500-506
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmat2460

Challenges and Prospects of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
journal, June 2012

  • Manthiram, Arumugam; Fu, Yongzhu; Su, Yu-Sheng
  • Accounts of Chemical Research, Vol. 46, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/ar300179v

Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
journal, July 2014

  • Manthiram, Arumugam; Fu, Yongzhu; Chung, Sheng-Heng
  • Chemical Reviews, Vol. 114, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1021/cr500062v

Capacity Fading Mechanisms on Cycling a High-Capacity Secondary Sulfur Cathode
journal, January 2004

  • Cheon, Sang-Eun; Choi, Soo-Seok; Han, Ji-Seong
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 151, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1815153

Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: Fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions
journal, June 2013


Polysulfide Shuttle Study in the Li/S Battery System
journal, January 2004

  • Mikhaylik, Yuriy V.; Akridge, James R.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 151, Issue 11, p. A1969-A1976
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1806394

Advances in Li–S batteries
journal, January 2010

  • Ji, Xiulei; Nazar, Linda F.
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry, Vol. 20, Issue 44, p. 9821-9826
  • DOI: 10.1039/b925751a

Lithium–sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer
journal, January 2012

  • Su, Yu-Sheng; Manthiram, Arumugam
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 3, Article No. 1166
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2163

Graphene-Wrapped Sulfur Particles as a Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Battery Cathode Material with High Capacity and Cycling Stability
journal, July 2011

  • Wang, Hailiang; Yang, Yuan; Liang, Yongye
  • Nano Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 7, p. 2644-2647
  • DOI: 10.1021/nl200658a

A new class of Solvent-in-Salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries
journal, February 2013

  • Suo, Liumin; Hu, Yong-Sheng; Li, Hong
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2513

Smaller Sulfur Molecules Promise Better Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
journal, October 2012

  • Xin, Sen; Gu, Lin; Zhao, Na-Hong
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 134, Issue 45
  • DOI: 10.1021/ja308170k

Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Electrochemistry, Materials, and Prospects
journal, November 2013

  • Yin, Ya-Xia; Xin, Sen; Guo, Yu-Guo
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 52, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1002/anie.201304762

Polysulfide dissolution control: the common ion effect
journal, January 2013

  • Shin, Eon Sung; Kim, Keon; Oh, Si Hyoung
  • Chem. Commun., Vol. 49, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1039/C2CC36986A

Sulphur–TiO2 yolk–shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium–sulphur batteries
journal, January 2013

  • Wei Seh, Zhi; Li, Weiyang; Cha, Judy J.
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 4, Article No. 1331
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2327

In Operando X-ray Diffraction and Transmission X-ray Microscopy of Lithium Sulfur Batteries
journal, March 2012

  • Nelson, Johanna; Misra, Sumohan; Yang, Yuan
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 134, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1021/ja2121926

Sulfur Speciation in Li–S Batteries Determined by Operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
journal, September 2013

  • Cuisinier, Marine; Cabelguen, Pierre-Etienne; Evers, Scott
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Vol. 4, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/jz401763d

X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of the Lithium-Sulfur Battery and its Components
journal, February 2014

  • Patel, Manu U. M.; Arčon, Iztok; Aquilanti, Giuliana
  • ChemPhysChem, Vol. 15, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201300972

Mechanistic insights into operational lithium–sulfur batteries by in situ X-ray diffraction and absorption spectroscopy
journal, January 2014

  • Lowe, Michael A.; Gao, Jie; Abruña, Héctor D.
  • RSC Advances, Vol. 4, Issue 35
  • DOI: 10.1039/c4ra01388c

New insight into the working mechanism of lithium–sulfur batteries: in situ and operando X-ray diffraction characterization
journal, January 2013

  • Waluś, Sylwia; Barchasz, Céline; Colin, Jean-François
  • Chemical Communications, Vol. 49, Issue 72
  • DOI: 10.1039/c3cc43766c

Application of In Operando UV/Vis Spectroscopy in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, July 2014


Direct Observation of Sulfur Radicals as Reaction Media in Lithium Sulfur Batteries
journal, December 2014

  • Wang, Qiang; Zheng, Jianming; Walter, Eric
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 162, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.0851503jes

Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry
book, January 2011


Fast, Reversible Lithium Storage with a Sulfur/Long-Chain-Polysulfide Redox Couple
journal, May 2013

  • Su, Yu-Sheng; Fu, Yongzhu; Guo, Bingkun
  • Chemistry - A European Journal, Vol. 19, Issue 26
  • DOI: 10.1002/chem.201300886

Controlled Nucleation and Growth Process of Li2S2/Li2S in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, January 2013

  • Zheng, Jianming; Gu, Meng; Wang, Chongmin
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 160, Issue 11, p. A1992-A1996
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.032311jes

High rate delithiation behaviour of LiFePO4 studied by quick X-ray absorption spectroscopy
journal, January 2012

  • Yu, Xiqian; Wang, Qi; Zhou, Yongning
  • Chemical Communications, Vol. 48, Issue 94
  • DOI: 10.1039/c2cc36382h

X-ray Absorption Spectra of Dissolved Polysulfides in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries from First-Principles
journal, April 2014

  • Pascal, Tod A.; Wujcik, Kevin H.; Velasco-Velez, Juan
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Vol. 5, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1021/jz500260s

High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Challenges of Thick Sulfur Cathodes
journal, March 2015

  • Lv, Dongping; Zheng, Jianming; Li, Qiuyan
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 5, Issue 16, Article No. 1402290
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201402290

Manipulating surface reactions in lithium–sulphur batteries using hybrid anode structures
journal, January 2014

  • Huang, Cheng; Xiao, Jie; Shao, Yuyan
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1, Article No. 3015
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4015

A High-Performance Polymer Tin Sulfur Lithium Ion Battery
journal, February 2010

  • Hassoun, Jusef; Scrosati, Bruno
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 49, Issue 13, p. 2371-2374
  • DOI: 10.1002/anie.200907324

Carbon-Based Anodes for Lithium Sulfur Full Cells with High Cycle Stability
journal, August 2013

  • Brückner, Jan; Thieme, Sören; Böttger-Hiller, Falko
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 24, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201302169

A Lithium-Sulfur Battery with a High Areal Energy Density
journal, June 2014

  • Kim, Joo-Seong; Hwang, Tae Hoon; Kim, Byung Gon
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 24, Issue 34
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201400935

In Situ Formation of Protective Coatings on Sulfur Cathodes in Lithium Batteries with LiFSI-Based Organic Electrolytes
journal, December 2014

  • Kim, Hyea; Wu, Feixiang; Lee, Jung Tae
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201401792

Understanding the Rate Capability of High-Energy-Density Li-Rich Layered Li 1.2 Ni 0.15 Co 0.1 Mn 0.55 O 2 Cathode Materials
journal, December 2013


ATHENA , ARTEMIS , HEPHAESTUS : data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT
journal, June 2005


A High-Performance Polymer Tin Sulfur Lithium Ion Battery
journal, February 2010


Works referencing / citing this record:

Advanced Characterization Techniques in Promoting Mechanism Understanding for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, March 2018

  • Zhao, Enyue; Nie, Kaihui; Yu, Xiqian
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 28, Issue 38
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201707543

A Comprehensive Understanding of Lithium–Sulfur Battery Technology
journal, June 2019

  • Li, Tao; Bai, Xue; Gulzar, Umair
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 29, Issue 32
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201901730

Structure-Property Relationships of Organic Electrolytes and Their Effects on Li/S Battery Performance
journal, June 2017

  • Kaiser, Mohammad Rejaul; Chou, Shulei; Liu, Hua-Kun
  • Advanced Materials, Vol. 29, Issue 48
  • DOI: 10.1002/adma.201700449

Revisiting the Role of Polysulfides in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, March 2018


Review on High-Loading and High-Energy Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, May 2017

  • Peng, Hong-Jie; Huang, Jia-Qi; Cheng, Xin-Bing
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 7, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201700260

Deciphering the Reaction Mechanism of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries by In Situ/Operando Synchrotron‐Based Characterization Techniques
journal, March 2019

  • Yan, Yingying; Cheng, Chen; Zhang, Liang
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 9, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201900148

Activating Inert Metallic Compounds for High‐Rate Lithium–Sulfur Batteries Through In Situ Etching of Extrinsic Metal
journal, March 2019

  • Zhao, Meng; Peng, Hong‐Jie; Zhang, Ze‐Wen
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 58, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/anie.201812062

A Toolbox for Lithium-Sulfur Battery Research: Methods and Protocols
journal, June 2017


In Situ Probing Multiple-Scale Structures of Energy Materials for Li-Ion Batteries
journal, May 2019


High-performance Li–S battery cathode with catalyst-like carbon nanotube-MoP promoting polysulfide redox
journal, June 2017


Understanding the Reaction Mechanism of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries by In Situ/Operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
journal, March 2019


Toward Better Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Functional Non-aqueous Liquid Electrolytes
journal, August 2018

  • Xiong, Shizhao; Regula, Michael; Wang, Donghai
  • Electrochemical Energy Reviews, Vol. 1, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s41918-018-0015-y

Using in situ and operando methods to characterize phase changes in charged lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide cathode materials
journal, January 2020


Review—Solid Electrolytes for Safe and High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Promises and Challenges
journal, June 2017

  • Judez, Xabier; Zhang, Heng; Li, Chunmei
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 165, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.0041801jes

Activating Inert Metallic Compounds for High‐Rate Lithium–Sulfur Batteries Through In Situ Etching of Extrinsic Metal
journal, January 2019

  • Zhao, Meng; Peng, Hong‐Jie; Zhang, Ze‐Wen
  • Angewandte Chemie, Vol. 131, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/ange.201812062

Review : Solid Electrolytes for Safe and High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries : Promises and Challenges
text, January 2018


Directing the Lithium–Sulfur Reaction Pathway via Sparingly Solvating Electrolytes for High Energy Density Batteries
journal, May 2017


High sulfur-containing carbon polysulfide polymer as a novel cathode material for lithium-sulfur battery
journal, September 2017