DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach

Abstract

Abstract. Parameterized boundary layer turbulence and moist convection remain some of the largest sources of uncertainty in general circulation models. High-resolution climate modeling aims to reduce that uncertainty by explicitly attempting to resolve deep moist convective motions. An example of such a model is the Simple Cloud-Resolving E3SM Atmosphere Model (SCREAM) with a target global resolution of 3.25 km, allowing for a more accurate representation of complex mesoscale deep convective dynamics. Yet, small-scale planetary boundary layer turbulence and shallow convection still need to be parameterized, which in SCREAM is accomplished through the turbulent-kinetic-energy-based (TKE-based) simplified higher-order closure (SHOC) – a simplified version of the assumed-double-Gaussian-PDF (probability density function) higher-order-closure method. In this paper, we implement a stochastic-multiplume mass-flux (MF) parameterization of dry and shallow convection in SCREAM to go beyond the limitations of double-Gaussian-PDF closures and couple it to SHOC (SHOC+MF). The new parameterization implemented in a single-column model type version of SCREAM produces results for two shallow cumulus convection cases (marine and continental shallow convection) that agree well with the reference data from large-eddy simulations, thus improving the general representation of the thermodynamic quantities and their turbulent fluxes as well as cloud macrophysics in the model. Furthermore, SHOC+MF parameterization showsmore » weak sensitivity to the vertical grid resolution and model time step.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ORCiD logo; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
University of California Los Angeles, CA (United States); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES). Scientific User Facilities (SUF); USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1968619
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1991539; OSTI ID: 2019556
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-855841
Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0019242; AC02-05CH11231; AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online) Journal Volume: 16 Journal Issue: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbH
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; shallow convection; parameterization; Earth system modeling; SCREAM; E3SM; 58 GEOSCIENCES

Citation Formats

Chinita, Maria J., Witte, Mikael, Kurowski, Marcin J., Teixeira, Joao, Suselj, Kay, Matheou, Georgios, and Bogenschutz, Peter. Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach. Germany: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023.
Chinita, Maria J., Witte, Mikael, Kurowski, Marcin J., Teixeira, Joao, Suselj, Kay, Matheou, Georgios, & Bogenschutz, Peter. Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023
Chinita, Maria J., Witte, Mikael, Kurowski, Marcin J., Teixeira, Joao, Suselj, Kay, Matheou, Georgios, and Bogenschutz, Peter. Thu . "Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023.
@article{osti_1968619,
title = {Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach},
author = {Chinita, Maria J. and Witte, Mikael and Kurowski, Marcin J. and Teixeira, Joao and Suselj, Kay and Matheou, Georgios and Bogenschutz, Peter},
abstractNote = {Abstract. Parameterized boundary layer turbulence and moist convection remain some of the largest sources of uncertainty in general circulation models. High-resolution climate modeling aims to reduce that uncertainty by explicitly attempting to resolve deep moist convective motions. An example of such a model is the Simple Cloud-Resolving E3SM Atmosphere Model (SCREAM) with a target global resolution of 3.25 km, allowing for a more accurate representation of complex mesoscale deep convective dynamics. Yet, small-scale planetary boundary layer turbulence and shallow convection still need to be parameterized, which in SCREAM is accomplished through the turbulent-kinetic-energy-based (TKE-based) simplified higher-order closure (SHOC) – a simplified version of the assumed-double-Gaussian-PDF (probability density function) higher-order-closure method. In this paper, we implement a stochastic-multiplume mass-flux (MF) parameterization of dry and shallow convection in SCREAM to go beyond the limitations of double-Gaussian-PDF closures and couple it to SHOC (SHOC+MF). The new parameterization implemented in a single-column model type version of SCREAM produces results for two shallow cumulus convection cases (marine and continental shallow convection) that agree well with the reference data from large-eddy simulations, thus improving the general representation of the thermodynamic quantities and their turbulent fluxes as well as cloud macrophysics in the model. Furthermore, SHOC+MF parameterization shows weak sensitivity to the vertical grid resolution and model time step.},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development (Online)},
number = 7,
volume = 16,
place = {Germany},
year = {Thu Apr 06 00:00:00 EDT 2023},
month = {Thu Apr 06 00:00:00 EDT 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Numerics of Physical Parametrization in the ECMWF Model
journal, September 2018


Simulation of Boundary-Layer Cumulus and Stratocumulus Clouds Using a Cloud-Resolving Model with Low-and Third-order Turbulence Closures
journal, January 2008

  • Cheng, Anning; Xu, Kuan-Man
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Vol. 86A
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.86A.67

Simulation of shallow cumuli and their transition to deep convective clouds by cloud-resolving models with different third-order turbulence closures
journal, January 2006

  • Cheng, Anning; Xu, Kuan-Man
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 132, Issue 615
  • DOI: 10.1256/qj.05.29

Non-precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization
journal, January 1973

  • Betts, A. K.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 99, Issue 419
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49709941915

Object‐Oriented Identification of Coherent Structures in Large Eddy Simulations: Importance of Downdrafts in Stratocumulus
journal, March 2019

  • Brient, Florent; Couvreux, Fleur; Villefranque, Najda
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018GL081499

Unified Entrainment and Detrainment Closures for Extended Eddy‐Diffusivity Mass‐Flux Schemes
journal, September 2020

  • Cohen, Yair; Lopez‐Gomez, Ignacio; Jaruga, Anna
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020MS002162

Towards Unifying the Planetary Boundary Layer and Shallow Convection in CAM5 with the Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Approach
journal, August 2019

  • J. Kurowski, Marcin; Thrastarson, Heidar Th.; Suselj, Kay
  • Atmosphere, Vol. 10, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.3390/atmos10090484

Evaluation of Parametric Assumptions for Shallow Cumulus Convection
journal, March 1995


A Dual Mass Flux Framework for Boundary Layer Convection. Part II: Clouds
journal, June 2009


Parameterization of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer: A View from Just Above the Inversion
journal, April 2008

  • Teixeira, J.; Stevens, B.; Bretherton, C. S.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 89, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-89-4-453

A Simple Mixing Length Formulation for the Eddy-Diffusivity Parameterization of Dry Convection
journal, March 2004


A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description
journal, December 2002


Is Shallow Convection Sensitive to Environmental Heterogeneities?
journal, February 2019

  • Kurowski, Marcin J.; Suselj, Kay; Grabowski, Wojciech W.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018GL080847

Augmenting the Double-Gaussian Representation of Atmospheric Turbulence and Convection via a Coupled Stochastic Multi-Plume Mass-Flux Scheme
journal, September 2022

  • Witte, Mikael K.; Herrington, Adam; Teixeira, Joao
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 150, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-21-0215.1

Sensitivity to Physical and Numerical Aspects of Large-Eddy Simulation of Stratocumulus
journal, July 2019


Turbulence Structure in a Stratocumulus Cloud
journal, October 2018


Unified treatment of dry convective and stratocumulus-topped boundary layers in the ECMWF model
journal, January 2011

  • Köhler, M.; Ahlgrimm, M.; Beljaars, A.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 137, Issue 654
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.713

On the Parameterization of Convective Downdrafts for Marine Stratocumulus Clouds
journal, April 2020


Nature versus Nurture in Shallow Convection
journal, May 2010

  • Romps, David M.; Kuang, Zhiming
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 67, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JAS3307.1

A Large Eddy Simulation Intercomparison Study of Shallow Cumulus Convection
journal, May 2003


An Extended Eddy‐Diffusivity Mass‐Flux Scheme for Unified Representation of Subgrid‐Scale Turbulence and Convection
journal, March 2018

  • Tan, Zhihong; Kaul, Colleen M.; Pressel, Kyle G.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017MS001162

A Joint Probability Density–Based Decomposition of Turbulence in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
journal, February 2018

  • Chinita, Maria J.; Matheou, Georgios; Teixeira, João
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 146, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0166.1

Implementation of a Stochastic Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Parameterization into the Navy Global Environmental Model
journal, December 2014

  • Sušelj, Kay; Hogan, Timothy F.; Teixeira, João
  • Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 29, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00043.1

A Unified Model for Moist Convective Boundary Layers Based on a Stochastic Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Parameterization
journal, July 2013

  • Sušelj, Kay; Teixeira, João; Chung, Daniel
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 70, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-12-0106.1

A Combined Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux Approach for the Convective Boundary Layer
journal, April 2007

  • Siebesma, A. Pier; Soares, Pedro M. M.; Teixeira, João
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 64, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3888.1

Large-Eddy Simulation of Stratified Turbulence. Part I: A Vortex-Based Subgrid-Scale Model
journal, May 2014

  • Chung, Daniel; Matheou, Georgios
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 71, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0126.1

On the Factors Controlling the Development of Shallow Convection in Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Models
journal, February 2019

  • Suselj, Kay; Kurowski, Marcin J.; Teixeira, João
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 76, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-18-0121.1

A New Mixing-Length Formulation for the Parameterization of Dry Convection: Implementation and Evaluation in a Mesoscale Model
journal, November 2004

  • Teixeira, J.; Ferreira, J. P.; Miranda, P. M. A.
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 132, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR2808.1

A Spectral Cumulus Parameterization Scheme Interpolating between Two Convective Updrafts with Semi-Lagrangian Calculation of Transport by Compensatory Subsidence
journal, February 2015

  • Yoshimura, Hiromasa; Mizuta, Ryo; Murakami, Hiroyuki
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 143, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00068.1

Influence of the Subcloud Layer on the Development of a Deep Convective Ensemble
journal, September 2012

  • Böing, Steven J.; Jonker, Harm J. J.; Siebesma, A. Pier
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 69, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-11-0317.1

Revision of Convection and Vertical Diffusion Schemes in the NCEP Global Forecast System
journal, August 2011


Local Versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model
journal, October 1993


The Counter-Gradient Heat Flux in the Lower Atmosphere and in the Laboratory
journal, September 1966


Climate goals and computing the future of clouds
journal, January 2017

  • Schneider, Tapio; Teixeira, João; Bretherton, Christopher S.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3190

A Thermal Plume Model for the Convective Boundary Layer: Representation of Cumulus Clouds
journal, February 2008

  • Rio, Catherine; Hourdin, Frédéric
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 65, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/2007JAS2256.1

Improving the Representation of Subtropical Boundary Layer Clouds in the NASA GEOS Model with the Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Parameterization
journal, March 2021

  • Suselj, Kay; Teixeira, Joao; Kurowski, Marcin J.
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 149, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-20-0183.1

A simplified PDF parameterization of subgrid-scale clouds and turbulence for cloud-resolving models: TURBULENCE SCHEME FOR CLOUD-RESOLVING MODELS
journal, April 2013

  • Bogenschutz, Peter A.; Krueger, Steven K.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20018

Large‐eddy simulation of very stable boundary layers. Part II: Length scales and anisotropy in stratified atmospheric turbulence
journal, April 2022

  • Chinita, Maria J.; Matheou, Georgios; Miranda, Pedro M. A.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 148, Issue 745
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.4280

Fully Conservative Higher Order Finite Difference Schemes for Incompressible Flow
journal, June 1998

  • Morinishi, Y.; Lund, T. S.; Vasilyev, O. V.
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 143, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.5962

The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere
journal, July 1962


The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution
journal, July 2019

  • Golaz, Jean‐Christophe; Caldwell, Peter M.; Van Roekel, Luke P.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001603

Large-Eddy Simulation of Stratified Turbulence. Part II: Application of the Stretched-Vortex Model to the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
journal, December 2014

  • Matheou, Georgios; Chung, Daniel
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 71, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0306.1

The E3SM version 1 single-column model
journal, January 2020

  • Bogenschutz, Peter A.; Tang, Shuaiqi; Caldwell, Peter M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-4443-2020

Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land
journal, April 2002

  • Brown, A. R.; Cederwall, R. T.; Chlond, A.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 128, Issue 582
  • DOI: 10.1256/003590002320373210

A Unified Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Approach for Modeling Atmospheric Convection
journal, August 2019

  • Suselj, Kay; Kurowski, Marcin J.; Teixeira, Joao
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 76, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-18-0239.1

Large‐eddy simulation of very stable boundary layers. Part I: Modeling methodology
journal, April 2022

  • Chinita, Maria J.; Matheou, Georgios; Miranda, Pedro M. A.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 148, Issue 745
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.4279

Eddy Diffusivity and Countergradient Transport in the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer
journal, July 1991


Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Antarctic Boundary Layer for Very Stable Stratification
journal, July 2020


Steady-State Large-Eddy Simulations to Study the Stratocumulus to Shallow Cumulus Cloud Transition
journal, November 2012

  • Chung, D.; Matheou, G.; Teixeira, J.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 69, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-11-0256.1

An Integrated TKE-Based Eddy Diffusivity/Mass Flux Boundary Layer Closure for the Dry Convective Boundary Layer
journal, July 2011

  • Witek, Marcin L.; Teixeira, Joao; Matheou, Georgios
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 68, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JAS3548.1

Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing
journal, January 2014

  • Sherwood, Steven C.; Bony, Sandrine; Dufresne, Jean-Louis
  • Nature, Vol. 505, Issue 7481
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12829

An eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux parametrization for dry and shallow cumulus convection
journal, October 2004

  • Soares, P. M. M.; Miranda, P. M. A.; Siebesma, A. P.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 130, Issue 604
  • DOI: 10.1256/qj.03.223

Revisiting the Entrainment Relationship of Convective Plumes: A Perspective From Global Observations
journal, March 2021

  • Takahashi, Hanii; Luo, Zhengzhao Johnny; Stephens, Graeme
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 48, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020GL092349

TKE-Based Moist Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux (EDMF) Parameterization for Vertical Turbulent Mixing
journal, July 2019


An Improved Double-Gaussian Closure for the Subgrid Vertical Velocity Probability Distribution Function
journal, January 2019


Resolved Versus Parametrized Boundary-Layer Plumes. Part I: A Parametrization-Oriented Conditional Sampling in Large-Eddy Simulations
journal, December 2009


Galilean invariance of shallow cumulus convection large-eddy simulations
journal, February 2021


Fitting and Analyzing LES Using Multiple Trivariate Gaussians
journal, March 2015

  • Firl, Grant J.; Randall, David A.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 72, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0192.1