DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty quantification of infinite aligned wind farm performance using non‐intrusive polynomial chaos and a distributed roughness model

Abstract

Abstract Uncertainty of wind farm parameters can have a significant effect on wind farm power output. Knowledge of the uncertainty‐produced stochastic distribution of the entire wind farm power output and the corresponding uncertainty propagation mechanisms is very important for evaluating the uncertainty effects on the wind farm performance during wind farm planning stage and providing insights on improving the performance of the existing wind farms. In this work, the propagation of uncertainties from surface roughness and induction factor in infinite aligned wind farms modeled by a modified distributed roughness model is investigated using non‐intrusive polynomial chaos. Stochastic analysis of surface roughness indicates that 30% uncertainty can propagate such that there is up a 8% uncertainty in the power output of the wind farm by affecting the uncertainty in the position of the individual wind turbines in the vertical boundary layer profile and uncertainty in vertical momentum fluxes which replenish energy in the wake in large wind farms. Induction factor uncertainty of the wind turbines can also have a significant effect on power output. Not only does its uncertainty substantially affect the vertical boundary layer profile, but the uncertainty in turbine wake growth which affects how neighboring turbine wakes interact. Wemore » found that optimal power output in terms of reduction of uncertainty closely correlates with the Betz limit and is dependent on the mean induction factor. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. St. Anthony Falls Laboratory University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
  2. St. Anthony Falls Laboratory University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
  3. Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering and Applied Science, Stony Brook University Stony Brook MN USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1401252
Grant/Contract Number:  
EE0002980; EE0005482; AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Wind Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Wind Energy Journal Volume: 20 Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 1095-4244
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Foti, Daniel, Yang, Xiaolei, and Sotiropoulos, Fotis. Uncertainty quantification of infinite aligned wind farm performance using non‐intrusive polynomial chaos and a distributed roughness model. United Kingdom: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/we.2072.
Foti, Daniel, Yang, Xiaolei, & Sotiropoulos, Fotis. Uncertainty quantification of infinite aligned wind farm performance using non‐intrusive polynomial chaos and a distributed roughness model. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2072
Foti, Daniel, Yang, Xiaolei, and Sotiropoulos, Fotis. Fri . "Uncertainty quantification of infinite aligned wind farm performance using non‐intrusive polynomial chaos and a distributed roughness model". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2072.
@article{osti_1401252,
title = {Uncertainty quantification of infinite aligned wind farm performance using non‐intrusive polynomial chaos and a distributed roughness model},
author = {Foti, Daniel and Yang, Xiaolei and Sotiropoulos, Fotis},
abstractNote = {Abstract Uncertainty of wind farm parameters can have a significant effect on wind farm power output. Knowledge of the uncertainty‐produced stochastic distribution of the entire wind farm power output and the corresponding uncertainty propagation mechanisms is very important for evaluating the uncertainty effects on the wind farm performance during wind farm planning stage and providing insights on improving the performance of the existing wind farms. In this work, the propagation of uncertainties from surface roughness and induction factor in infinite aligned wind farms modeled by a modified distributed roughness model is investigated using non‐intrusive polynomial chaos. Stochastic analysis of surface roughness indicates that 30% uncertainty can propagate such that there is up a 8% uncertainty in the power output of the wind farm by affecting the uncertainty in the position of the individual wind turbines in the vertical boundary layer profile and uncertainty in vertical momentum fluxes which replenish energy in the wake in large wind farms. Induction factor uncertainty of the wind turbines can also have a significant effect on power output. Not only does its uncertainty substantially affect the vertical boundary layer profile, but the uncertainty in turbine wake growth which affects how neighboring turbine wakes interact. We found that optimal power output in terms of reduction of uncertainty closely correlates with the Betz limit and is dependent on the mean induction factor. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.},
doi = {10.1002/we.2072},
journal = {Wind Energy},
number = 6,
volume = 20,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Dec 02 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Fri Dec 02 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2072

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 7 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A hybrid statistical method to predict wind speed and wind power
journal, August 2010


Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Fluid Dynamics
conference, June 2010

  • Hosder, Serhat; Walters, Robert
  • 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
  • DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-129

Stochastic Fluid Mechanics via Polynomial Chaos
conference, November 2003


Airplane Propellers
book, January 1935


Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos
journal, May 2003


Uncertainty analysis near bifurcation of an aeroelastic system
journal, August 2010


Characterizing and mitigating the wind resource-based uncertainty in farm performance
journal, January 2012


Modeling physical uncertainties in dynamic stall induced fluid–structure interaction of turbine blades using arbitrary polynomial chaos
journal, June 2007


Quadratic Limit States in Structural Reliability
journal, August 1979

  • Fiessler, Bernd; Neumann, Hans-Joachim; Rackwitz, Rudiger
  • Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 105, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1061/JMCEA3.0002512

The Homogeneous Chaos
journal, October 1938

  • Wiener, Norbert
  • American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 60, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2307/2371268

Review on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation
journal, April 2014


A review on the young history of the wind power short-term prediction
journal, August 2008

  • Costa, Alexandre; Crespo, Antonio; Navarro, Jorge
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 12, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.01.015

Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach
book, January 1991


Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers
journal, January 2010

  • Calaf, Marc; Meneveau, Charles; Meyers, Johan
  • Physics of Fluids, Vol. 22, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.3291077

Wind turbine power curve estimation based on cluster center fuzzy logic modeling
journal, May 2008

  • Üstüntaş, Taner; Şahin, Ahmet Duran
  • Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 96, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.001

Representative roughness parameters for homogeneous terrain
journal, March 1993


On the wind speed reduction in the center of large clusters of wind turbines
journal, January 1992


Global sensitivity analysis of wind turbine power output: Global sensitivity analysis of wind turbine power output
journal, April 2013

  • McKay, Phillip M.; Carriveau, Rupp; Ting, David S-K.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 17, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.1614

Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification: With Applications to Computational Fluid Dynamics
book, January 2010


Estimation of wind energy potential using different probability density functions
journal, May 2011


A tutorial on the dynamics and control of wind turbines and wind farms
conference, June 2009


Wind power forecasting using advanced neural networks models
journal, January 1996

  • Kariniotakis, G. N.; Stavrakakis, G. S.; Nogaret, E. F.
  • IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1109/60.556376

Atmospheric Turbulence Effects on Wind-Turbine Wakes: An LES Study
journal, December 2012

  • Wu, Yu-Ting; Porté-Agel, Fernando
  • Energies, Vol. 5, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.3390/en5125340

Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis
journal, July 2006


Quantifying uncertainty in chemical systems modeling
journal, January 2005

  • Reagan, M. T.; Najm, H. N.; Pébay, P. P.
  • International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, Vol. 37, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/kin.20081

Computational study and modeling of turbine spacing effects in infinite aligned wind farms
journal, November 2012

  • Yang, Xiaolei; Kang, Seokkoo; Sotiropoulos, Fotis
  • Physics of Fluids, Vol. 24, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4767727

Multivariate and Multimodal Wind Distribution Model Based on Kernel Density Estimation
conference, March 2012

  • Zhang, Jie; Chowdhury, Souma; Messac, Achille
  • ASME 2011 5th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Parts A, B, and C
  • DOI: 10.1115/ES2011-54507

A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems
journal, May 2008


Uncertainty in the Specification of Surface Characteristics: a Study of Prediction Errors in the Boundary Layer
journal, March 1997

  • Alapaty, Kiran; Raman, Sethu; Niyogi, Devdutta S.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 82, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1017166907476