DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Understanding the representativeness of FLUXNET for upscaling carbon flux from eddy covariance measurements

Abstract

Eddy covariance data from regional flux networks are direct in situ measurement of carbon, water, and energy fluxes and are of vital importance for understanding the spatio-temporal dynamics of the the global carbon cycle. FLUXNET links regional networks of eddy covariance sites across the globe to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of fluxes at regional to global scales and to detect emergent ecosystem properties. This study presents an assessment of the representativeness of FLUXNET based on the recently released FLUXNET2015 data set. We present a detailed high resolution analysis of the evolving representativeness of FLUXNET through time. Results provide quantitative insights into the extent that various biomes are sampled by the network of networks, the role of the spatial distribution of the sites on the network scale representativeness at any given time, and how that representativeness has changed through time due to changing operational status and data availability at sites in the network. To realize the full potential of FLUXNET observations for understanding emergent ecosystem properties at regional and global scales, we present an approach for upscaling eddy covariance measurements. Informed by the representativeness of observations at the flux sites in the network, the upscaled data reflects the spatio-temporalmore » dynamics of the carbon cycle captured by the in situ measurements. In conclusion, this study presents a method for optimal use of the rich point measurements from FLUXNET to derive an understanding of upscaled carbon fluxes, which can be routinely updated as new data become available, and direct network expansion by identifying regions poorly sampled by the current network.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  2. USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
Work for Others (WFO); USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1327770
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Earth System Science Data Discussions
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Earth System Science Data Discussions; Journal ID: ISSN 1866-3591
Publisher:
Copernicus
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES

Citation Formats

Kumar, Jitendra, Hoffman, Forrest M., Hargrove, William W., and Collier, Nathan. Understanding the representativeness of FLUXNET for upscaling carbon flux from eddy covariance measurements. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.5194/essd-2016-36.
Kumar, Jitendra, Hoffman, Forrest M., Hargrove, William W., & Collier, Nathan. Understanding the representativeness of FLUXNET for upscaling carbon flux from eddy covariance measurements. United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2016-36
Kumar, Jitendra, Hoffman, Forrest M., Hargrove, William W., and Collier, Nathan. Tue . "Understanding the representativeness of FLUXNET for upscaling carbon flux from eddy covariance measurements". United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2016-36. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1327770.
@article{osti_1327770,
title = {Understanding the representativeness of FLUXNET for upscaling carbon flux from eddy covariance measurements},
author = {Kumar, Jitendra and Hoffman, Forrest M. and Hargrove, William W. and Collier, Nathan},
abstractNote = {Eddy covariance data from regional flux networks are direct in situ measurement of carbon, water, and energy fluxes and are of vital importance for understanding the spatio-temporal dynamics of the the global carbon cycle. FLUXNET links regional networks of eddy covariance sites across the globe to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of fluxes at regional to global scales and to detect emergent ecosystem properties. This study presents an assessment of the representativeness of FLUXNET based on the recently released FLUXNET2015 data set. We present a detailed high resolution analysis of the evolving representativeness of FLUXNET through time. Results provide quantitative insights into the extent that various biomes are sampled by the network of networks, the role of the spatial distribution of the sites on the network scale representativeness at any given time, and how that representativeness has changed through time due to changing operational status and data availability at sites in the network. To realize the full potential of FLUXNET observations for understanding emergent ecosystem properties at regional and global scales, we present an approach for upscaling eddy covariance measurements. Informed by the representativeness of observations at the flux sites in the network, the upscaled data reflects the spatio-temporal dynamics of the carbon cycle captured by the in situ measurements. In conclusion, this study presents a method for optimal use of the rich point measurements from FLUXNET to derive an understanding of upscaled carbon fluxes, which can be routinely updated as new data become available, and direct network expansion by identifying regions poorly sampled by the current network.},
doi = {10.5194/essd-2016-36},
journal = {Earth System Science Data Discussions},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Aug 23 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Tue Aug 23 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Works referencing / citing this record:

Fluxes all of the time? A primer on the temporal representativeness of FLUXNET: FLUXES ALL OF THE TIME?
journal, February 2017

  • Chu, Housen; Baldocchi, Dennis D.; John, Ranjeet
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 122, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016jg003576

Large‐Scale Droughts Responsible for Dramatic Reductions of Terrestrial Net Carbon Uptake Over North America in 2011 and 2012
journal, July 2018

  • He, Wei; Ju, Weimin; Schwalm, Christopher R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 123, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jg004520

Optimizing an Environmental Observatory Network Design Using Publicly Available Data
journal, July 2019

  • Villarreal, Samuel; Guevara, Mario; Alcaraz‐Segura, Domingo
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 124, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jg004714

The International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) System: Design, Theory, and Implementation
journal, November 2018

  • Collier, Nathan; Hoffman, Forrest M.; Lawrence, David M.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001354

Revealing biogeochemical signatures of Arctic landscapes with river chemistry
journal, September 2019


Effect of drought on productivity in a Costa Rican tropical dry forest
journal, March 2018

  • Castro, S. M.; Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A.; Sato, H.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaacbc

Forests dominate the interannual variability of the North American carbon sink
journal, August 2018

  • Shiga, Yoichi P.; Michalak, Anna M.; Fang, Yuanyuan
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aad505

Identifying multidisciplinary research gaps across Arctic terrestrial gradients
journal, December 2019


Terrestrial gross primary production: Using NIR V to scale from site to globe
journal, July 2019

  • Badgley, Grayson; Anderegg, Leander D. L.; Berry, Joseph A.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 25, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14729

The impact of alternative trait-scaling hypotheses for the maximum photosynthetic carboxylation rate ( V cmax ) on global gross primary production
journal, June 2017

  • Walker, Anthony P.; Quaife, Tristan; van Bodegom, Peter M.
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 215, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.14623

California air resources board forest carbon protocol invalidates offsets
journal, January 2019

  • Marino, Bruno D. V.; Mincheva, Martina; Doucett, Aaron
  • PeerJ, Vol. 7
  • DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7606