DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive crowdsourcing

Abstract

Global concern regarding pollinator decline has intensified interest in enhancing pollinator resources in managed landscapes. These efforts frequently emphasize restoration or planting of flowering plants to provide pollen and nectar resources that are highly attractive to the desired pollinators. However, determining exactly which plant species should be used to enhance a landscape is difficult. Empirical screening of plants for such purposes is logistically daunting, but could be streamlined by crowdsourcing data to create lists of plants most probable to attract the desired pollinator taxa. People frequently photograph plants in bloom and the Internet has become a vast repository of such images. A proportion of these images also capture floral visitation by arthropods. Here, we test the hypothesis that the abundance of floral images containing identifiable pollinator and other beneficial insects is positively associated with the observed attractiveness of the same species in controlled field trials from previously published studies. We used Google Image searches to determine the correlation of pollinator visitation captured by photographs on the Internet relative to the attractiveness of the same species in common-garden field trials for 43 plant species. From the first 30 photographs, which successfully identified the plant, we recorded the number of Apis (managedmore » honeybees), non-Apis (exclusively wild bees) and the number of bee-mimicking syrphid flies. We used these observations from search hits as well as bloom period (BP) as predictor variables in Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) for field-observed abundances of each of these groups. We found that non-Apis bees observed in controlled field trials were positively associated with observations of these taxa in Google Image searches (pseudo-R2 of 0.668). Syrphid fly observations in the field were also associated with the frequency they were observed in images, but this relationship was weak. Apis bee observations were not associated with Internet images, but were slightly associated with BP. Our results suggest that passively crowdsourced image data can potentially be a useful screening tool to identify candidate plants for pollinator habitat restoration efforts directed at wild bee conservation. Increasing our understanding of the attractiveness of a greater diversity of plants increases the potential for more rapid and efficient research in creating pollinator-supportive landscapes.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1]
  1. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States). Dept. of Entomology
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States); Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); National Science Foundation (NSF); Michigan State University
OSTI Identifier:
1326681
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC02-07ER64494; NSF DEB 1027253
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Royal Society Open Science
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 3; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 2054-5703
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; 99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS; bee; data mining; nectar; pollination; search engine

Citation Formats

Bahlai, Christie A., and Landis, Douglas A. Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive crowdsourcing. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1098/rsos.150677.
Bahlai, Christie A., & Landis, Douglas A. Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive crowdsourcing. United States. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150677
Bahlai, Christie A., and Landis, Douglas A. Wed . "Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive crowdsourcing". United States. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150677. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1326681.
@article{osti_1326681,
title = {Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive crowdsourcing},
author = {Bahlai, Christie A. and Landis, Douglas A.},
abstractNote = {Global concern regarding pollinator decline has intensified interest in enhancing pollinator resources in managed landscapes. These efforts frequently emphasize restoration or planting of flowering plants to provide pollen and nectar resources that are highly attractive to the desired pollinators. However, determining exactly which plant species should be used to enhance a landscape is difficult. Empirical screening of plants for such purposes is logistically daunting, but could be streamlined by crowdsourcing data to create lists of plants most probable to attract the desired pollinator taxa. People frequently photograph plants in bloom and the Internet has become a vast repository of such images. A proportion of these images also capture floral visitation by arthropods. Here, we test the hypothesis that the abundance of floral images containing identifiable pollinator and other beneficial insects is positively associated with the observed attractiveness of the same species in controlled field trials from previously published studies. We used Google Image searches to determine the correlation of pollinator visitation captured by photographs on the Internet relative to the attractiveness of the same species in common-garden field trials for 43 plant species. From the first 30 photographs, which successfully identified the plant, we recorded the number of Apis (managed honeybees), non-Apis (exclusively wild bees) and the number of bee-mimicking syrphid flies. We used these observations from search hits as well as bloom period (BP) as predictor variables in Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) for field-observed abundances of each of these groups. We found that non-Apis bees observed in controlled field trials were positively associated with observations of these taxa in Google Image searches (pseudo-R2 of 0.668). Syrphid fly observations in the field were also associated with the frequency they were observed in images, but this relationship was weak. Apis bee observations were not associated with Internet images, but were slightly associated with BP. Our results suggest that passively crowdsourced image data can potentially be a useful screening tool to identify candidate plants for pollinator habitat restoration efforts directed at wild bee conservation. Increasing our understanding of the attractiveness of a greater diversity of plants increases the potential for more rapid and efficient research in creating pollinator-supportive landscapes.},
doi = {10.1098/rsos.150677},
journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
number = 6,
volume = 3,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 16 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Global Stock of Domesticated Honey Bees Is Growing Slower Than Agricultural Demand for Pollination
journal, June 2009


Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
journal, June 2010

  • Potts, Simon G.; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.; Kremen, Claire
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 25, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007

Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance
journal, February 2013


Identifying key knowledge needs for evidence-based conservation of wild insect pollinators: a collaborative cross-sectoral exercise
journal, October 2012


Utilisation of agri-environment scheme habitats to enhance invertebrate ecosystem service providers
journal, January 2014


The identity of crop pollinators helps target conservation for improved ecosystem services
journal, January 2014


Pathogens, Pests, and Economics: Drivers of Honey Bee Colony Declines and Losses
journal, December 2013


Habitat Management to Conserve Natural Enemies of Arthropod Pests in Agriculture
journal, January 2000


Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes
journal, January 2014

  • Werling, B. P.; Dickson, T. L.; Isaacs, R.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309492111

Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and the pollination services provided to a pollination-dependent crop
journal, April 2014


Maximizing arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: the role of native plants
journal, May 2009

  • Isaacs, Rufus; Tuell, Julianna; Fiedler, Anna
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1890/080035

Spatial and Temporal Variation in Natural Enemy Assemblages on Maryland Native Plant Species
journal, April 2008

  • Frank, Steven D.; Shrewsbury, Paula M.; Esiekpe, Okemeteri
  • Environmental Entomology, Vol. 37, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/ee/37.2.478

Landscape configuration of crops and hedgerows drives local syrphid fly abundance
journal, February 2014

  • Haenke, Sebastian; Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó; Fründ, Jochen
  • Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 51, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12221

Attractiveness of Michigan Native Plants to Arthropod Natural Enemies and Herbivores
journal, August 2007

  • Fiedler, A. K.; Landis, D. A.
  • Environmental Entomology, Vol. 36, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/ee/36.4.751

EDITOR'S CHOICE: Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower-visiting aerial insects (pollinators): should we plant native or exotic species?
journal, August 2015

  • Salisbury, Andrew; Armitage, James; Bostock, Helen
  • Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 52, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12499

Visitation by Wild and Managed Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) to Eastern U.S. Native Plants for Use in Conservation Programs
journal, June 2008


Listmania: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Lists of Garden Plants to Help Pollinators
journal, September 2014


Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits
journal, December 2010


Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive
journal, December 2013

  • Teacher, Amber G. F.; Griffiths, David J.; Hodgson, David J.
  • Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 3, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/ece3.888

Using monitoring data gathered by volunteers to predict the potential distribution of the invasive alien bumblebee Bombus terrestris
journal, May 2009


Using citizen science to monitor Bombus populations in the UK: nesting ecology and relative abundance in the urban environment
journal, November 2011

  • Lye, Gillian C.; Osborne, Juliet L.; Park, Kirsty J.
  • Journal of Insect Conservation, Vol. 16, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10841-011-9450-3

Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen‐science programs
journal, August 2012

  • Gardiner, Mary M.; Allee, Leslie L.; Brown, Peter MJ
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 10, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1890/110185

Social.Water—A crowdsourcing tool for environmental data acquisition
journal, December 2012


CrowdHydrology: Crowdsourcing Hydrologic Data and Engaging Citizen Scientists
journal, June 2012


Assessing Google Flu Trends Performance in the United States during the 2009 Influenza Virus A (H1N1) Pandemic
journal, August 2011


Image search—from thousands to billions in 20 years
journal, October 2013

  • Zhang, Lei; Rui, Yong
  • ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, Vol. 9, Issue 1s
  • DOI: 10.1145/2490823

Recreational demand for clean water: evidence from geotagged photographs by visitors to lakes
journal, March 2015

  • Keeler, Bonnie L.; Wood, Spencer A.; Polasky, Stephen
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1890/140124

Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination
journal, November 2015

  • Rader, Romina; Bartomeus, Ignasi; Garibaldi, Lucas A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517092112

North American Dipteran Pollinators: Assessing Their Value and Conservation Status
journal, January 2001


Do not log-transform count data: Do not log-transform count data
journal, March 2010


ggplot2
book, January 2009


The Demand for Automobiles
journal, August 1970

  • Cragg, John G.; Uhler, Russell S.
  • The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/133656

Global invasions of the western honeybee ( Apis mellifera ) and the consequences for biodiversity
journal, January 2005


The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance
journal, May 2005

  • Riley, J. R.; Greggers, U.; Smith, A. D.
  • Nature, Vol. 435, Issue 7039
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature03526

Maximizing ecosystem services from conservation biological control: The role of habitat management
journal, May 2008


Linking bees and Flowers: how do Floral Communities Structure Pollinator Communities?
journal, October 2003

  • Potts, Simon G.; Vulliamy, Betsy; Dafni, Amots
  • Ecology, Vol. 84, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1890/02-0136

Landscape enhancement of floral resources for honey bees in agro-ecosystems
journal, May 2010


Plant Characteristics Associated with Natural Enemy Abundance at Michigan Native Plants
journal, August 2007

  • Fiedler, A. K.; Landis, D. A.
  • Environmental Entomology, Vol. 36, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/ee/36.4.878

Crowdsourcing Large-Scale Ecological Monitoring: Identifying Design Principles to Motivate Contributors
book, January 2013


Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect
journal, September 2012

  • Black, Sheila R.; McCown, Steven; Lookadoo, Regan L.
  • Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2011.639868

Pollinator observations in google images
dataset, January 2014


Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive
journal, December 2013

  • Teacher, Amber G. F.; Griffiths, David J.; Hodgson, David J.
  • Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 3, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/ece3.888

Honeybees are poor pollinators ? why?
journal, January 1991

  • Westerkamp, Christian
  • Plant Systematics and Evolution, Vol. 177, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/bf00937827

Pathogens, Pests, and Economics: Drivers of Honey Bee Colony Declines and Losses
journal, December 2013


Using citizen science to monitor Bombus populations in the UK: nesting ecology and relative abundance in the urban environment
journal, November 2011

  • Lye, Gillian C.; Osborne, Juliet L.; Park, Kirsty J.
  • Journal of Insect Conservation, Vol. 16, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10841-011-9450-3

The Global Stock of Domesticated Honey Bees Is Growing Slower Than Agricultural Demand for Pollination
journal, June 2009


Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
journal, June 2010

  • Potts, Simon G.; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.; Kremen, Claire
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 25, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007

Landscape configuration of crops and hedgerows drives local syrphid fly abundance
journal, February 2014

  • Haenke, Sebastian; Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó; Fründ, Jochen
  • Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 51, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12221

Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits
journal, December 2010


Habitat Management to Conserve Natural Enemies of Arthropod Pests in Agriculture
journal, January 2000


Assessing Google Flu Trends Performance in the United States during the 2009 Influenza Virus A (H1N1) Pandemic
journal, August 2011


The Demand for Automobiles
journal, August 1970

  • Cragg, John G.; Uhler, Russell S.
  • The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/133656

Works referencing / citing this record:

Using web-sourced photography to explore the diet of a declining African raptor, the Martial Eagle (Polemaetus bellicosus)
journal, February 2019

  • Naude, Vincent N.; Smyth, Lucy K.; Weideman, Eleanor A.
  • The Condor, Vol. 121, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/condor/duy015

Thermally moderated firefly activity is delayed by precipitation extremes
journal, December 2016

  • Hermann, Sara L.; Xue, Saisi; Rowe, Logan
  • Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 3, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160712

Analysing ecological networks of species interactions: Analyzing ecological networks
journal, June 2018

  • Delmas, Eva; Besson, Mathilde; Brice, Marie-Hélène
  • Biological Reviews, Vol. 94, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/brv.12433

Thermally moderated firefly activity is delayed by precipitation extremes
journal, November 2016

  • Hermann, Sara L.; Xue, Saisi; Rowe, Logan
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • DOI: 10.1101/074633

Thermally moderated firefly activity is delayed by precipitation extremes
journal, November 2016

  • Hermann, Sara L.; Xue, Saisi; Rowe, Logan
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • DOI: 10.1101/074633

Analyzing ecological networks of species interactions
journal, March 2018

  • Delmas, Eva; Besson, Mathilde; Brice, Marie-H??l??ne
  • Biological Reviews
  • DOI: 10.1101/112540