DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Review, evaluation, and discussion of the challenges of missing value imputation for mass spectrometry-based label-free global proteomics

Abstract

In this review, we apply selected imputation strategies to label-free liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) proteomics datasets to evaluate the accuracy with respect to metrics of variance and classification. We evaluate several commonly used imputation approaches for individual merits and discuss the caveats of each approach with respect to the example LC–MS proteomics data. In general, local similarity-based approaches, such as the regularized expectation maximization and least-squares adaptive algorithms, yield the best overall performances with respect to metrics of accuracy and robustness. However, no single algorithm consistently outperforms the remaining approaches, and in some cases, performing classification without imputation sometimes yielded the most accurate classification. Thus, because of the complex mechanisms of missing data in proteomics, which also vary from peptide to protein, no individual method is a single solution for imputation. In summary, on the basis of the observations in this review, the goal for imputation in the field of computational proteomics should be to develop new approaches that work generically for this data type and new strategies to guide users in the selection of the best imputation for their dataset and analysis objectives.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1287493
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC06-76RL01830; DK071283; HHSN27220080060C; U01CA184783-01; U54-ES016015; P41-RR018522; P41-GM103493
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Proteome Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 14; Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 1535-3893
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; 59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; imputation; label free; peak intensity; accuracy; mean-square error; classification

Citation Formats

Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M., Wiberg, Holli K., Matzke, Melissa M., Brown, Joseph N., Wang, Jing, McDermott, Jason E., Smith, Richard D., Rodland, Karin D., Metz, Thomas O., Pounds, Joel G., and Waters, Katrina M. Review, evaluation, and discussion of the challenges of missing value imputation for mass spectrometry-based label-free global proteomics. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1021/pr501138h.
Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M., Wiberg, Holli K., Matzke, Melissa M., Brown, Joseph N., Wang, Jing, McDermott, Jason E., Smith, Richard D., Rodland, Karin D., Metz, Thomas O., Pounds, Joel G., & Waters, Katrina M. Review, evaluation, and discussion of the challenges of missing value imputation for mass spectrometry-based label-free global proteomics. United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr501138h
Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M., Wiberg, Holli K., Matzke, Melissa M., Brown, Joseph N., Wang, Jing, McDermott, Jason E., Smith, Richard D., Rodland, Karin D., Metz, Thomas O., Pounds, Joel G., and Waters, Katrina M. Thu . "Review, evaluation, and discussion of the challenges of missing value imputation for mass spectrometry-based label-free global proteomics". United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr501138h. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1287493.
@article{osti_1287493,
title = {Review, evaluation, and discussion of the challenges of missing value imputation for mass spectrometry-based label-free global proteomics},
author = {Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M. and Wiberg, Holli K. and Matzke, Melissa M. and Brown, Joseph N. and Wang, Jing and McDermott, Jason E. and Smith, Richard D. and Rodland, Karin D. and Metz, Thomas O. and Pounds, Joel G. and Waters, Katrina M.},
abstractNote = {In this review, we apply selected imputation strategies to label-free liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) proteomics datasets to evaluate the accuracy with respect to metrics of variance and classification. We evaluate several commonly used imputation approaches for individual merits and discuss the caveats of each approach with respect to the example LC–MS proteomics data. In general, local similarity-based approaches, such as the regularized expectation maximization and least-squares adaptive algorithms, yield the best overall performances with respect to metrics of accuracy and robustness. However, no single algorithm consistently outperforms the remaining approaches, and in some cases, performing classification without imputation sometimes yielded the most accurate classification. Thus, because of the complex mechanisms of missing data in proteomics, which also vary from peptide to protein, no individual method is a single solution for imputation. In summary, on the basis of the observations in this review, the goal for imputation in the field of computational proteomics should be to develop new approaches that work generically for this data type and new strategies to guide users in the selection of the best imputation for their dataset and analysis objectives.},
doi = {10.1021/pr501138h},
journal = {Journal of Proteome Research},
number = 5,
volume = 14,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Apr 09 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Thu Apr 09 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 145 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: Average log10 intensity as measured by peptide peak area in the control group versus fraction of missing values and peptide counts associated with bins corresponding to the fraction of missing data comparing phenotypes and exposures for datasets from (A) human plasma and (B) mouse lung. The control groupmore » for the human plasma is the normal glucose tolerant (NGT) samples, and the sham group for the mouse lung is the regular weight mice with no lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure. The vertical red line represents median average intensity, and the horizontal red line represents the point that 50% of the values are missing.« less

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Super-SILAC Allows Classification of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Subtypes by Their Protein Expression Profiles
journal, May 2012

  • Deeb, Sally J.; D'Souza, Rochelle C. J.; Cox, Jürgen
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015362

Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays
journal, June 2001


DAnTE: a statistical tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data
journal, May 2008


How advancement in biological network analysis methods empowers proteomics
journal, January 2012


Statistical Design of Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Experiments
journal, March 2009

  • Oberg, Ann L.; Vitek, Olga
  • Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/pr8010099

Biological impact of missing-value imputation on downstream analyses of gene expression profiles
journal, November 2010


Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis
journal, August 1999

  • Tipping, Michael E.; Bishop, Christopher M.
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 61, Issue 3, p. 611-622
  • DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00196

Comparative Network-Based Recovery Analysis and Proteomic Profiling of Neurological Changes in Valproic Acid-Treated Mice
journal, April 2013

  • Goh, Wilson Wen Bin; Sergot, Marek J.; Sng, Judy Cg
  • Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/pr301127f

A review on recent developments in mass spectrometry instrumentation and quantitative tools advancing bacterial proteomics
journal, April 2013

  • Van Oudenhove, Laurence; Devreese, Bart
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 97, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-4897-7

Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values
journal, October 2006

  • Donders, A. Rogier T.; van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.; Stijnen, Theo
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 59, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014

A statistical framework for protein quantitation in bottom-up MS-based proteomics
journal, June 2009


Assessment and Improvement of Statistical Tools for Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Sparse Data Sets with Few Experimental Replicates
journal, August 2013

  • Schwämmle, Veit; León, Ileana Rodríguez; Jensen, Ole Nørregaard
  • Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 12, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1021/pr400045u

Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
journal, July 2012

  • Bantscheff, Marcus; Lemeer, Simone; Savitski, Mikhail M.
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Vol. 404, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4

Normalization Approaches for Removing Systematic Biases Associated with Mass Spectrometry and Label-Free Proteomics
journal, February 2006

  • Callister, Stephen J.; Barry, Richard C.; Adkins, Joshua N.
  • Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/pr050300l

Addressing the Challenge of Defining Valid Proteomic Biomarkers and Classifiers
journal, January 2010

  • Dakna, Mohammed; Harris, Keith; Kalousis, Alexandros
  • BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-594

Statistical Similarities between Transcriptomics and Quantitative Shotgun Proteomics Data
journal, April 2008

  • Pavelka, Norman; Fournier, Marjorie L.; Swanson, Selene K.
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M700240-MCP200

DanteR: an extensible R-based tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data
journal, July 2012


A statistical selection strategy for normalization procedures in LC-MS proteomics experiments through dataset-dependent ranking of normalization scaling factors
journal, November 2011

  • Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M.; Matzke, Melissa M.; Jacobs, Jon M.
  • PROTEOMICS, Vol. 11, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100078

Urinary Protein Profiles in a Rat Model for Diabetic Complications
journal, September 2009

  • Schlatzer, Daniela M.; Dazard, Jean-Eudes; Dharsee, Moyez
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Vol. 8, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M800558-MCP200

Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity
journal, February 2013

  • Smith, Lloyd M.; Kelleher, Neil L.
  • Nature Methods, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2369

Quantitation in Mass-Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
journal, June 2010


LSimpute: accurate estimation of missing values in microarray data with least squares methods
journal, February 2004


Statistical protein quantification and significance analysis in label-free LC-MS experiments with complex designs
journal, January 2012


Normalization and missing value imputation for label-free LC-MS analysis
journal, November 2012


Missing value imputation improves clustering and interpretation of gene expression microarray data
journal, April 2008

  • Tuikkala, Johannes; Elo, Laura L.; Nevalainen, Olli S.
  • BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-202

Data merging for integrated microarray and proteomic analysis
journal, May 2006

  • Waters, K. M.; Pounds, J. G.; Thrall, B. D.
  • Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/ell019

Bayesian Analysis of iTRAQ Data with Nonrandom Missingness: Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins
journal, October 2009

  • Luo, Ruiyan; Colangelo, Christopher M.; Sessa, William C.
  • Statistics in Biosciences, Vol. 1, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12561-009-9013-2

Missing values in gel-based proteomics
journal, January 2010

  • Albrecht, Daniela; Kniemeyer, Olaf; Brakhage, Axel A.
  • PROTEOMICS, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800576

A comparative analysis of computational approaches to relative protein quantification using peptide peak intensities in label-free LC-MS proteomics experiments
journal, November 2012

  • Matzke, Melissa M.; Brown, Joseph N.; Gritsenko, Marina A.
  • PROTEOMICS, Vol. 13, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200269

A Bayesian missing value estimation method for gene expression profile data
journal, October 2003


Missing value estimation for DNA microarray gene expression data: local least squares imputation
journal, August 2004


Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions
journal, May 2010

  • Hubner, Nina C.; Bird, Alexander W.; Cox, Jürgen
  • Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 189, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200911091

Serum Proteomics in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review
journal, April 2013

  • Zhang, Ai-hua; Sun, Hui; Yan, Guang-li
  • Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 170, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12010-013-0238-7

Dealing with missing values in large-scale studies: microarray data imputation and beyond
journal, December 2009


Mass-spectrometry-based clinical proteomics – a review and prospective
journal, January 2010

  • Parker, Carol E.; Pearson, Terry W.; Anderson, N. Leigh
  • The Analyst, Vol. 135, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/c0an00105h

Using a spike-in experiment to evaluate analysis of LC-MS data
journal, January 2012

  • Tuli, Leepika; Tsai, Tsung-Heng; Varghese, Rency S.
  • Proteome Science, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-13

Which missing value imputation method to use in expression profiles: a comparative study and two selection schemes
journal, January 2008

  • Brock, Guy N.; Shaffer, John R.; Blakesley, Richard E.
  • BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-12

Application of survival analysis methodology to the quantitative analysis of LC-MS proteomics data
journal, May 2012


Combined Statistical Analyses of Peptide Intensities and Peptide Occurrences Improves Identification of Significant Peptides from MS-Based Proteomics Data
journal, November 2010

  • Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M.; McCue, Lee Ann; Waters, Katrina M.
  • Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 9, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/pr1005247

Bayesian Proteoform Modeling Improves Protein Quantification of Global Proteomic Measurements
journal, November 2014

  • Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M.; Matzke, Melissa M.; Datta, Susmita
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Vol. 13, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M113.030932

Sequential projection pursuit principal component analysis – dealing with missing data associated with new -omics technologies
journal, March 2013

  • Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M.; Matzke, Melissa M.; Metz, Thomas O.
  • BioTechniques, Vol. 54, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2144/000113978

Works referencing / citing this record:

MetaPro-IQ: a universal metaproteomic approach to studying human and mouse gut microbiota
journal, June 2016


Comparison of iTRAQ and SWATH in a clinical study with multiple time points
journal, July 2018


Global proteomics profiling improves drug sensitivity prediction: results from a multi-omics, pan-cancer modeling approach
journal, November 2017


Using hyperLOPIT to perform high-resolution mapping of the spatial proteome
journal, May 2017

  • Mulvey, Claire M.; Breckels, Lisa M.; Geladaki, Aikaterini
  • Nature Protocols, Vol. 12, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.026

Random forest-based imputation outperforms other methods for imputing LC-MS metabolomics data: a comparative study
journal, October 2019

  • Kokla, Marietta; Virtanen, Jyrki; Kolehmainen, Marjukka
  • BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 20, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3110-0

BayesENproteomics: Bayesian elastic nets for quantification of proteoforms in complex samples
posted_content, May 2019

  • Mallikarjun, Venkatesh; Richardson, Stephen M.; Swift, Joe
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • DOI: 10.1101/295527

Focus on the spectra that matter by clustering of quantification data in shotgun proteomics
journal, June 2020


Disease-specific IgG Fc N-glycosylation as personalized biomarkers to differentiate gastric cancer from benign gastric diseases
journal, May 2016

  • Zhang, Dan; Chen, Bingchao; Wang, Yanmin
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep25957

Machine Learning Applications for Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics
journal, June 2020


A Bioconductor workflow for processing and analysing spatial proteomics data
text, January 2016

  • Breckels, Lisa; Mulvey, Claire; Lilley, Kathryn
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.18792

AKT but not MYC promotes reactive oxygen species-mediated cell death in oxidative culture
journal, February 2020

  • Zheng, Dongqing; Sussman, Jonathan H.; Jeon, Matthew P.
  • Journal of Cell Science, Vol. 133, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1242/jcs.239277

The use of missing values in proteomic data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry to enable disease activity discrimination
journal, December 2019


Robust determination of differential abundance in shotgun proteomics using nonparametric statistics
journal, January 2018

  • Slama, Patrick; Hoopmann, Michael R.; Moritz, Robert L.
  • Molecular Omics, Vol. 14, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1039/c8mo00077h

Advanced bioinformatics methods for practical applications in proteomics
journal, October 2017

  • Goh, Wilson Wen Bin; Wong, Limsoon
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics, Vol. 20, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx128

AKT but not MYC promotes reactive oxygen species-mediated cell death in oxidative culture
posted_content, September 2019

  • Zheng, Dongqing; Sussman, Jonathan H.; Jeon, Matthew P.
  • DOI: 10.1101/754572

Associations of diet and lifestyle factors with common volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of average-risk individuals
journal, March 2019

  • Krilaviciute, Agne; Leja, Marcis; Kopp-Schneider, Annette
  • Journal of Breath Research, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aaf3dc

Decreased Antibiotic Susceptibility Driven by Global Remodeling of the Klebsiella pneumoniae Proteome
journal, January 2019

  • Keasey, Sarah L.; Suh, Moo-Jin; Das, Sudipto
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1074/mcp.ra118.000739

The impact of nanoparticle protein corona on cytotoxicity, immunotoxicity and target drug delivery
journal, January 2016

  • Corbo, Claudia; Molinaro, Roberto; Parodi, Alessandro
  • Nanomedicine, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2217/nnm.15.188

Machine learning and feature selection for drug response prediction in precision oncology applications
journal, August 2018


MSqRob takes the missing hurdle: uniting intensity- and count-based proteomics
posted_content, November 2019

  • Goeminne, Ludger J. E.; Sticker, Adriaan; Martens, Lennart
  • bioRxiv
  • DOI: 10.1101/782466

Identification of differentially expressed peptides in high-throughput proteomics data
journal, March 2017

  • van Ooijen, Michiel P.; Jong, Victor L.; Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx031

Machine Learning Applications for Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics
text, January 2020


Proteins involved in embryo-maternal interaction around the signalling of maternal recognition of pregnancy in the horse
journal, March 2018


A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics
journal, April 2019

  • Pappireddi, Nishant; Martin, Lance; Wühr, Martin
  • ChemBioChem, Vol. 20, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201800650

Characterization of Lipid and Lipid Droplet Metabolism in Human HCC
journal, May 2019

  • Berndt, Nikolaus; Eckstein, Johannes; Heucke, Niklas
  • Cells, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.3390/cells8050512

A Bioconductor workflow for processing and analysing spatial proteomics data
journal, January 2016


A Bioconductor workflow for processing and analysing spatial proteomics data
journal, January 2016


Characterization of Lipid and Lipid Droplet Metabolism in Human HCC
text, January 2019

  • Berndt, Nikolaus; Eckstein, Johannes; Heucke, Niklas
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • DOI: 10.17169/refubium-26720

MS1 ion current‐based quantitative proteomics: A promising solution for reliable analysis of large biological cohorts
journal, March 2019

  • Wang, Xue; Shen, Shichen; Rasam, Sailee Suryakant
  • Mass Spectrometry Reviews, Vol. 38, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/mas.21595

Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling
journal, November 2015


PaDuA: A Python Library for High-Throughput (Phospho)proteomics Data Analysis
journal, December 2018


pmartR : Quality Control and Statistics for Mass Spectrometry-Based Biological Data
journal, January 2019

  • Stratton, Kelly G.; Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M.; McCue, Lee Ann
  • Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 18, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00760

In-depth method assessments of differentially expressed protein detection for shotgun proteomics data with missing values
journal, June 2017


Proteins involved in embryo-maternal interaction around the signalling of maternal recognition of pregnancy in the horse
journal, March 2018


A Bayesian algorithm for detecting differentially expressed proteins and its application in breast cancer research
journal, July 2016

  • Santra, Tapesh; Delatola, Eleni Ioanna
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep30159

Quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human colon cancer DLD-1 cells differing in ploidy and chromosome stability
journal, May 2018

  • Viganó, Cristina; von Schubert, Conrad; Ahrné, Erik
  • Molecular Biology of the Cell, Vol. 29, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e17-10-0577

A comprehensive evaluation of popular proteomics software workflows for label-free proteome quantification and imputation
journal, May 2017

  • Välikangas, Tommi; Suomi, Tomi; Elo, Laura L.
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx054

Temporal probabilistic modeling of bacterial compositions derived from 16S rRNA sequencing
posted_content, September 2016

  • Äijö, Tarmo; Müller, Christian L.; Bonneau, Richard
  • bioRxiv
  • DOI: 10.1101/076836

Comparison of iTRAQ and SWATH in a clinical study with multiple time points
journal, July 2018


MetaPro-IQ: a universal metaproteomic approach to studying human and mouse gut microbiota
journal, June 2016


Integrating Transcriptomic and Proteomic Data Using Predictive Regulatory Network Models of Host Response to Pathogens
journal, July 2016


A Bioconductor workflow for processing and analysing spatial proteomics data
text, January 2016

  • Breckels, Lisa; Mulvey, Claire; Lilley, Kathryn
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.18792

The Role of EGFR in Influenza Pathogenicity: Multiple Network-Based Approaches to Identify a Key Regulator of Non-lethal Infections
journal, September 2019

  • Mitchell, Hugh D.; Eisfeld, Amie J.; Stratton, Kelly G.
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Vol. 7
  • DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00200

Standardizing Proteomics Workflow for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Technical and Statistical Considerations
journal, January 2019

  • Srivastava, Sudhir; Merchant, Michael; Rai, Anil
  • Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics, Vol. 12, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.35248/0974-276x.19.12.496

Dynamic post-translational modification profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected primary macrophages
journal, January 2020

  • Budzik, Jonathan M.; Swaney, Danielle L.; Jimenez-Morales, David
  • eLife, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.7554/elife.51461

Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.