Classification of US hydropower dams by their modes of operation
Abstract
A key challenge to understanding ecohydrologic responses to dam regulation is the absence of a universally transferable classification framework for how dams operate. In the present paper, we develop a classification system to organize the modes of operation (MOPs) for U.S. hydropower dams and powerplants. To determine the full diversity of MOPs, we mined federal documents, open-access data repositories, and internet sources. W then used CART classification trees to predict MOPs based on physical characteristics, regulation, and project generation. Finally, we evaluated how much variation MOPs explained in sub-daily discharge patterns for stream gages downstream of hydropower dams. After reviewing information for 721 dams and 597 power plants, we developed a 2-tier hierarchical classification based on 1) the storage and control of flows to powerplants, and 2) the presence of a diversion around the natural stream bed. This resulted in nine tier-1 MOPs representing a continuum of operations from strictly peaking, to reregulating, to run-of-river, and two tier-2 MOPs, representing diversion and integral dam-powerhouse configurations. Although MOPs differed in physical characteristics and energy production, classification trees had low accuracies (<62%), which suggested accurate evaluations of MOPs may require individual attention. MOPs and dam storage explained 20% of the variation inmore »
- Authors:
-
- Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1240527
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC05-00OR22725
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- River Research and Applications
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: River Research and Applications; Journal ID: ISSN 1535-1459
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 13 HYDRO ENERGY; dam; hydrology; hydropower; stream ecology; hydrologic modeling
Citation Formats
McManamay, Ryan A., Oigbokie, II, Clement O., Kao, Shih -Chieh, and Bevelhimer, Mark S. Classification of US hydropower dams by their modes of operation. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web. doi:10.1002/rra.3004.
McManamay, Ryan A., Oigbokie, II, Clement O., Kao, Shih -Chieh, & Bevelhimer, Mark S. Classification of US hydropower dams by their modes of operation. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3004
McManamay, Ryan A., Oigbokie, II, Clement O., Kao, Shih -Chieh, and Bevelhimer, Mark S. Fri .
"Classification of US hydropower dams by their modes of operation". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3004. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1240527.
@article{osti_1240527,
title = {Classification of US hydropower dams by their modes of operation},
author = {McManamay, Ryan A. and Oigbokie, II, Clement O. and Kao, Shih -Chieh and Bevelhimer, Mark S.},
abstractNote = {A key challenge to understanding ecohydrologic responses to dam regulation is the absence of a universally transferable classification framework for how dams operate. In the present paper, we develop a classification system to organize the modes of operation (MOPs) for U.S. hydropower dams and powerplants. To determine the full diversity of MOPs, we mined federal documents, open-access data repositories, and internet sources. W then used CART classification trees to predict MOPs based on physical characteristics, regulation, and project generation. Finally, we evaluated how much variation MOPs explained in sub-daily discharge patterns for stream gages downstream of hydropower dams. After reviewing information for 721 dams and 597 power plants, we developed a 2-tier hierarchical classification based on 1) the storage and control of flows to powerplants, and 2) the presence of a diversion around the natural stream bed. This resulted in nine tier-1 MOPs representing a continuum of operations from strictly peaking, to reregulating, to run-of-river, and two tier-2 MOPs, representing diversion and integral dam-powerhouse configurations. Although MOPs differed in physical characteristics and energy production, classification trees had low accuracies (<62%), which suggested accurate evaluations of MOPs may require individual attention. MOPs and dam storage explained 20% of the variation in downstream subdaily flow characteristics and showed consistent alterations in subdaily flow patterns from reference streams. Lastly, this standardized classification scheme is important for future research including estimating reservoir operations for large-scale hydrologic models and evaluating project economics, environmental impacts, and mitigation.},
doi = {10.1002/rra.3004},
journal = {River Research and Applications},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Feb 19 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Fri Feb 19 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Dam Design can Impede Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows: A Case Study from the Opuha Dam, New Zealand
journal, November 2012
- Lessard, JoAnna; Murray Hicks, D.; Snelder, Ton H.
- Environmental Management, Vol. 51, Issue 2
Fish assemblages respond to altered flow regimes via ecological filtering of life history strategies
journal, October 2012
- Mims, Meryl C.; Olden, Julian D.
- Freshwater Biology, Vol. 58, Issue 1
Impact of Water Projects on River Flow Regimes and Water Quality in Huai River Basin
journal, July 2009
- Zhang, Yongyong; Xia, Jun; Liang, Tao
- Water Resources Management, Vol. 24, Issue 5
How much water does a river need?
journal, February 1997
- Richter, Brian; Baumgartner, Jeffrey; Wigington, Robert
- Freshwater Biology, Vol. 37, Issue 1
Water quantity and quality optimization modeling of dams operation based on SWAT in Wenyu River Catchment, China
journal, March 2010
- Zhang, Yongyong; Xia, Jun; Chen, Junfeng
- Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 173, Issue 1-4
2014 Hydropower Market Report
report, April 2015
- Uria-Martinez, Rocio; O'Connor, Patrick W.; Johnson, Megan M.
Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications
journal, March 2007
- Poff, N. L.; Olden, J. D.; Merritt, D. M.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, Issue 14
Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity
journal, October 2002
- Bunn, Stuart E.; Arthington, Angela H.
- Environmental Management, Vol. 30, Issue 4
New Stream-reach Development: A Comprehensive Assessment of Hydropower Energy Potential in the United States
report, April 2014
- Kao, Shih-Chieh; McManamay, Ryan A.; Stewart, Kevin M.
A reservoir operation scheme for global river routing models
journal, July 2006
- Hanasaki, Naota; Kanae, Shinjiro; Oki, Taikan
- Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 327, Issue 1-2
Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole-basin scale
journal, November 2010
- Zimmerman, Julie K. H.; Letcher, Benjamin H.; Nislow, Keith H.
- River Research and Applications, Vol. 26, Issue 10
Adaptive Management of Flows in the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, USA
journal, April 2005
- Pearsall, Sam H.; McCrodden, Brian J.; Townsend, Philip A.
- Environmental Management, Vol. 35, Issue 4
Quantifying and generalizing hydrologic responses to dam regulation using a statistical modeling approach
journal, November 2014
- McManamay, Ryan A.
- Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 519
Updating the US hydrologic classification: an approach to clustering and stratifying ecohydrologic data: US HYDROLOGIC CLASSIFICATION
journal, July 2013
- McManamay, Ryan A.; Bevelhimer, Mark S.; Kao, Shih-Chieh
- Ecohydrology, Vol. 7, Issue 3
How Run-of-River Operation Affects Hydropower Generation and Value
journal, September 2007
- Jager, Henriette I.; Bevelhimer, Mark S.
- Environmental Management, Vol. 40, Issue 6
High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management
journal, May 2011
- Lehner, Bernhard; Liermann, Catherine Reidy; Revenga, Carmen
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 9, Issue 9
Stopping Rules in Principal Components Analysis: A Comparison of Heuristical and Statistical Approaches
journal, December 1993
- Jackson, Donald A.
- Ecology, Vol. 74, Issue 8
Characterizing Sub-Daily Flow Regimes: Implications of Hydrologic Resolution on Ecohydrology Studies: SUB-DAILY STREAM FLOW METRICS
journal, May 2014
- Bevelhimer, M. S.; McManamay, R. A.; O'Connor, B.
- River Research and Applications, Vol. 31, Issue 7
Encyclopedia of Lakes and Reservoirs
book, January 2012
- Bengtsson, Lars; Herschy, Reginald W.; Fairbridge, Rhodes W.
Cumulative biophysical impact of small and large hydropower development in Nu River, China: Biophysical Impact of Small and Large Hydropower
journal, June 2013
- Kibler, Kelly M.; Tullos, Desiree D.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 49, Issue 6
A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation
journal, January 2003
- Döll, Petra; Kaspar, Frank; Lehner, Bernhard
- Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 270, Issue 1-2
Optimal Operation of Multireservoir Systems: State-of-the-Art Review
journal, March 2004
- Labadie, John W.
- Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 130, Issue 2
How Dams Vary and Why It Matters for the Emerging Science of Dam Removal
journal, January 2002
- Poff, N. Leroy; Hart, David D.
- BioScience, Vol. 52, Issue 8
Restoring Environmental Flows by Modifying Dam Operations
journal, January 2007
- Richter, Brian D.; Thomas, Gregory A.
- Ecology and Society, Vol. 12, Issue 1
Optimizing environmental flows for multiple reaches affected by a multipurpose reservoir system in Taiwan: Restoring natural flow regimes at multiple temporal scales: ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS AT MULTIPLE SCALES
journal, January 2013
- Shiau, Jenq-Tzong; Wu, Fu-Chun
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 49, Issue 1
Reservoir‐System Simulation and Optimization Models
journal, July 1993
- Wurbs, Ralph A.
- Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 119, Issue 4
A multiobjective short-term optimal operation model for a cascade system of reservoirs considering the impact on long-term energy production: A MULTIOBJECTIVE SHORT-TERM OPTIMAL OPERATION MODEL
journal, May 2015
- Xu, Bin; Zhong, Ping-An; Stanko, Zachary
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 5
Daily operation of a multipurpose reservoir system
journal, February 1983
- Yazicigil, Hasan; Houck, Mark H.; Toebes, Gerrit H.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 19, Issue 1
Reservoir Management and Operations Models: A State-of-the-Art Review
journal, December 1985
- Yeh, William W-G.
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, Issue 12
Works referencing / citing this record:
Organizing Environmental Flow Frameworks to Meet Hydropower Mitigation Needs
journal, June 2016
- McManamay, Ryan A.; Brewer, Shannon K.; Jager, Henriette I.
- Environmental Management, Vol. 58, Issue 3
Managing rivers under changing environmental and societal boundary conditions, Part 1: National trends and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers reservoirs
journal, March 2019
- Patterson, Lauren A.; Doyle, Martin W.
- River Research and Applications, Vol. 35, Issue 4
Annual shifts of flow regime alteration: new insights from the Chaishitan Reservoir in China
journal, January 2018
- Zhang, Yongyong; Zhai, Xiaoyan; Zhao, Tongtiegang
- Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, Issue 1
Classifying Dams for Environmental Flow Implementation in China
journal, December 2019
- Chen, Ang; Wu, Miao; McClain, Michael E.
- Sustainability, Vol. 12, Issue 1
Exit here: strategies for dealing with aging dams and reservoirs
journal, October 2019
- Hansen, Henry H.; Forzono, Emily; Grams, Alisha
- Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 82, Issue 1
Annual shifts of flow regime alteration: new insights from the Chaishitan Reservoir in China
journal, January 2018
- Zhang, Yongyong; Zhai, Xiaoyan; Zhao, Tongtiegang
- Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, Issue 1