Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion
Abstract
Abstract A socioeconomic model is used to estimate the land‐use implications on the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program from potential increases in second‐generation biofuel production. A baseline scenario with no second‐generation biofuel production is compared to a scenario where the Renewable Fuels Standard ( RFS 2) volumes are met by 2022. We allow for the possibility of converting expiring CRP lands to alternative uses such as conventional crops, dedicated second‐generation biofuel crops, or harvesting existing CRP grasses for biomass. Results indicate that RFS 2 volumes ( RFS 2‐v) can be met primarily with crop residues (78% of feedstock demand) and woody residues (19% of feedstock demand) compared with dedicated biomass (3% of feedstock demand), with only minimal conversion of cropland (0.27 million hectares, <1% of total cropland), pastureland (0.28 million hectares of pastureland, <1% of total pastureland), and CRP lands (0.29 million hectares of CRP lands, 3% of existing CRP lands) to biomass production. Meeting RFS 2 volumes would reduce CRP re‐enrollment by 0.19 million hectares, or 4%, below the baseline scenario where RFS 2 is not met. Yet under RFS 2‐v scenario, expiring CRP lands are more likely to be converted to or maintain perennial cover, with 1.78 million hectares of CRP lands convertingmore »
- Authors:
-
- Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee Knoxville TN 37996 USA
- National Center for Environmental Assessment US EPA Mail Code: 8601‐P,1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20460 USA
- Environmental Science Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USA
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1234762
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1261500; OSTI ID: 1345703
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC05-00OR22725; EP-13-H-000183/0001
- Resource Type:
- Published Article
- Journal Name:
- Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Journal Volume: 8 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 1757-1693
- Publisher:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Country of Publication:
- United Kingdom
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 09 BIOMASS FUELS; Conservation Reserve Program; Energy Independence and Security Act; land-use change; Renewable Fuel Standard; second-generation biofuels; UNITED-STATES; SWITCHGRASS; GRASSLAND; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; ENERGY
Citation Formats
Hellwinckel, Chad, Clark, Christopher, Langholtz, Matthew, and Eaton, Laurence. Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion. United Kingdom: N. p., 2015.
Web. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12281.
Hellwinckel, Chad, Clark, Christopher, Langholtz, Matthew, & Eaton, Laurence. Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12281
Hellwinckel, Chad, Clark, Christopher, Langholtz, Matthew, and Eaton, Laurence. Wed .
"Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12281.
@article{osti_1234762,
title = {Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion},
author = {Hellwinckel, Chad and Clark, Christopher and Langholtz, Matthew and Eaton, Laurence},
abstractNote = {Abstract A socioeconomic model is used to estimate the land‐use implications on the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program from potential increases in second‐generation biofuel production. A baseline scenario with no second‐generation biofuel production is compared to a scenario where the Renewable Fuels Standard ( RFS 2) volumes are met by 2022. We allow for the possibility of converting expiring CRP lands to alternative uses such as conventional crops, dedicated second‐generation biofuel crops, or harvesting existing CRP grasses for biomass. Results indicate that RFS 2 volumes ( RFS 2‐v) can be met primarily with crop residues (78% of feedstock demand) and woody residues (19% of feedstock demand) compared with dedicated biomass (3% of feedstock demand), with only minimal conversion of cropland (0.27 million hectares, <1% of total cropland), pastureland (0.28 million hectares of pastureland, <1% of total pastureland), and CRP lands (0.29 million hectares of CRP lands, 3% of existing CRP lands) to biomass production. Meeting RFS 2 volumes would reduce CRP re‐enrollment by 0.19 million hectares, or 4%, below the baseline scenario where RFS 2 is not met. Yet under RFS 2‐v scenario, expiring CRP lands are more likely to be converted to or maintain perennial cover, with 1.78 million hectares of CRP lands converting to hay production, and 0.29 million hectares being harvested for existing grasses. A small amount of CRP is harvested for existing biomass, but no conversion of CRP to dedicated biomass crops, such as switchgrass, are projected to occur. Although less land is enrolled in CRP under RFS 2‐v scenario, total land in perennial cover increases by 0.15 million hectares, or 2%, under RFS 2‐v. Sensitivity to yield, payment and residue retention assumptions are evaluated.},
doi = {10.1111/gcbb.12281},
journal = {Global Change Biology. Bioenergy},
number = 1,
volume = 8,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Wed Jul 29 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Wed Jul 29 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12281
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12281
Other availability
Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal
Cited by: 13 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science
Web of Science
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.
Works referenced in this record:
Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands
journal, February 2013
- Wright, C. K.; Wimberly, M. C.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 10
Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest
journal, January 2013
- Gelfand, Ilya; Sahajpal, Ritvik; Zhang, Xuesong
- Nature, Vol. 493, Issue 7433
Estimating Price Variability in Agriculture: Implications for Decision Makers
journal, July 1998
- Ray, Daryll E.; Richardson, James W.; De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel G.
- Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 30, Issue 1
Empirical geographic modeling of switchgrass yields in the United States: EMPIRICAL SWITCHGRASS MODELING
journal, September 2010
- Jager, Henriette I.; Baskaran, Latha M.; Brandt, Craig C.
- GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 2, Issue 5
Corn-Based Ethanol Production and Environmental Quality: A Case of Iowa and the Conservation Reserve Program
journal, August 2009
- Secchi, Silvia; Gassman, Philip W.; Williams, Jimmy R.
- Environmental Management, Vol. 44, Issue 4
Evaluating possible cap and trade legislation on cellulosic feedstock availability: POLICY IMPACTS ON FEEDSTOCK AVAILABILITY
journal, September 2010
- Hellwinckel, Chad M.; West, Tristram O.; De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel G.
- GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 2, Issue 5
Biofuel and Food-Commodity Prices
journal, September 2012
- Hochman, Gal; Kaplan, Scott; Rajagopal, Deepak
- Agriculture, Vol. 2, Issue 3
The land use–climate change–energy nexus
journal, May 2011
- Dale, Virginia H.; Efroymson, Rebecca A.; Kline, Keith L.
- Landscape Ecology, Vol. 26, Issue 6
Nitrogen and harvest management of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grassland for sustainable biomass feedstock production
journal, May 2012
- Lee, Do Kyoung; Aberle, Ezra; Chen, Chengci
- GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 5, Issue 1
Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass
journal, January 2008
- Schmer, M. R.; Vogel, K. P.; Mitchell, R. B.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 2
The Ecological Impact of Biofuels
journal, December 2010
- Fargione, Joseph E.; Plevin, Richard J.; Hill, Jason D.
- Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Vol. 41, Issue 1
What drives changes in commodity prices? Is it biofuels?
journal, July 2010
- Tyner, Wallace E.
- Biofuels, Vol. 1, Issue 4
Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass
journal, December 2006
- Tilman, D.; Hill, J.; Lehman, C.
- Science, Vol. 314, Issue 5805
Developing an Integrated Model Framework for the Assessment of Sustainable Agricultural Residue Removal Limits for Bioenergy Systems
conference, June 2012
- Muth, David; McCorkle, Douglas; Abodeely, Jared
- ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Volume 2: 31st Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts A and B
Agricultural Impacts of Biofuels Production
journal, August 2007
- Walsh, Marie E.; Ugarte, Daniel G. De La Torre; English, Burton C.
- Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 39, Issue 2