Modeling number of bacteria per food unit in comparison to bacterial concentration in quantitative risk assessment: Impact on risk estimates

Pouillot, Régis; Chen, Yuhuan; Hoelzer, Karin

doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.05.008

Title: Modeling number of bacteria per food unit in comparison to bacterial concentration in quantitative risk assessment: Impact on risk estimates

Full Record
Other Related Research

Authors:

; Chen, Yuhuan; Hoelzer, Karin

Publication Date:: Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2015

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE

OSTI Identifier:: 1233900

Resource Type:: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:: Food Microbiology (Print)

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Name: Food Microbiology (Print) Journal Volume: 45 Journal Issue: PB; Journal ID: ISSN 0740-0020

Publisher:: Elsevier

Country of Publication:: United Kingdom

Language:: English

Citation Formats


                    Pouillot, Régis, Chen, Yuhuan, and Hoelzer, Karin. Modeling number of bacteria per food unit in comparison to bacterial concentration in quantitative risk assessment: Impact on risk estimates.  United Kingdom: N. p., 2015. 
Web.  doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.05.008.

Copy to clipboard


                    Pouillot, Régis, Chen, Yuhuan, & Hoelzer, Karin. Modeling number of bacteria per food unit in comparison to bacterial concentration in quantitative risk assessment: Impact on risk estimates.  United Kingdom.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.05.008

Copy to clipboard


                    Pouillot, Régis, Chen, Yuhuan, and Hoelzer, Karin. Sun .  
"Modeling number of bacteria per food unit in comparison to bacterial concentration in quantitative risk assessment: Impact on risk estimates".  United Kingdom.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.05.008.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1233900,

  title        = {Modeling number of bacteria per food unit in comparison to bacterial concentration in quantitative risk assessment: Impact on risk estimates},

  author       = {Pouillot, Régis and Chen, Yuhuan and Hoelzer, Karin},

  abstractNote = {},

  doi          = {10.1016/j.fm.2014.05.008},

  journal      = {Food Microbiology (Print)},

  number       = PB,

  volume       = 45,

  place        = {United Kingdom},

  year         = {Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2015},

  month        = {Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2015}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.05.008

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 10 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Norovirus Transmission in Food Establishments: Evaluating the Impact of Intervention Strategies and Food Employee Behavior on the Risk Associated with Norovirus in Foods

Journal Article Duret, Steven ; Pouillot, Régis ; Fanaselle, Wendy ; ... - Risk Analysis

Abstract We developed a quantitative risk assessment model using a discrete event framework to quantify and study the risk associated with norovirus transmission to consumers through food contaminated by infected food employees in a retail food setting. This study focused on the impact of ill food workers experiencing symptoms of diarrhea and vomiting and potential control measures for the transmission of norovirus to foods. The model examined the behavior of food employees regarding exclusion from work while ill and after symptom resolution and preventive measures limiting food contamination during preparation. The mean numbers of infected customers estimated for 21 scenariosmore »« less
Cited by 20
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12758
Chemical Impacts of Potential CO₂ and Brine Leakage on Groundwater Quality with Quantitative Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the Farnsworth Unit

Journal Article Xiao, Ting ; McPherson, Brian ; Esser, Richard ; ... - Energies

Potential leakage of reservoir fluids is considered a key risk factor for geologic CO₂ sequestration (GCS), with concerns of their chemical impacts on the quality of overlying underground sources of drinking water (USDWs). Effective risk assessment provides useful information to guide GCS activities for protecting USDWs. In this study, we present a quantified risk assessment case study of an active commercial-scale CO₂-enhanced oil recovery (CO₂-EOR) and sequestration field, the Farnsworth Unit (FWU). Specific objectives of this study include: (1) to quantify potential risks of CO₂ and brine leakage to the overlying USDW quality with response surface methodology (RSM); and (2)more »« less
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246574

Full Text Available
Comparison of the DOE and the EPA human risk assessment methodologies and default parameter values for the food ingestion pathway

Journal Article Tan, Zuo ; Eckart, R - Transactions of the American Nuclear Society

Both the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have developed methodology for radiological health-risk assessments and cleanup criteria for sites contaminated with radioactive materials. It is widely recognized that these methods are different and can yield significantly different results for the same site. For example, a risk level of 10 x 10{sup -5} may require a cleanup criteria of 10 pCi/g using EPA methodology and 100 pCi/g using DOE methodology or vice versa. Cleanup costs increase exponentially at very low levels of cleanup, making it imperative that we understand and can reconcile the differencesmore »« less
Quantitative Risk Assessment of Salmonella in Ground Beef Products and the Resulting Impact of Risk Mitigation Strategies on Public Health

Journal Article Strickland, Ali J. ; Sampedro, Fernando ; Hedberg, Craig W. - Journal of Food Protection
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100093
A comparison of risk assessment techniques from qualitative to quantitative

Conference Altenbach, T J

Risk assessment techniques vary from purely qualitative approaches, through a regime of semi-qualitative to the more traditional quantitative. Constraints such as time, money, manpower, skills, management perceptions, risk result communication to the public, and political pressures all affect the manner in which risk assessments are carried out. This paper surveys some risk matrix techniques, examining the uses and applicability for each. Limitations and problems for each technique are presented and compared to the others. Risk matrix approaches vary from purely qualitative axis descriptions of accident frequency vs consequences, to fully quantitative axis definitions using multi-attribute utility theory to equate differentmore » types of risk from the same operation.« less
Full Text Available

Similar Records