Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of a Pebble Bed HTGR Loss of Cooling Event
Abstract
The Very High Temperature Reactor Methods Development group at the Idaho National Laboratory identified the need for a defensible and systematic uncertainty and sensitivity approach in 2009. This paper summarizes the results of an uncertainty and sensitivity quantification investigation performed with the SUSA code, utilizing the International Atomic Energy Agency CRP 5 Pebble Bed Modular Reactor benchmark and the INL code suite PEBBED-THERMIX. Eight model input parameters were selected for inclusion in this study, and after the input parameters variations and probability density functions were specified, a total of 800 steady state and depressurized loss of forced cooling (DLOFC) transient PEBBED-THERMIX calculations were performed. The six data sets were statistically analyzed to determine the 5% and 95% DLOFC peak fuel temperature tolerance intervals with 95% confidence levels. It was found that the uncertainties in the decay heat and graphite thermal conductivities were the most significant contributors to the propagated DLOFC peak fuel temperature uncertainty. No significant differences were observed between the results of Simple Random Sampling (SRS) or Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) data sets, and use of uniform or normal input parameter distributions also did not lead to any significant differences between these data sets.
- Authors:
-
- Nuclear Science and Engineering Division, Idaho National Laboratory (INL), 2525 N. Fremont Avenue, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA
- Publication Date:
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1198171
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC07-05ID1451
- Resource Type:
- Published Article
- Journal Name:
- Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations Journal Volume: 2013; Journal ID: ISSN 1687-6075
- Publisher:
- Hindawi Publishing Corporation
- Country of Publication:
- Egypt
- Language:
- English
Citation Formats
Strydom, Gerhard. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of a Pebble Bed HTGR Loss of Cooling Event. Egypt: N. p., 2013.
Web. doi:10.1155/2013/426356.
Strydom, Gerhard. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of a Pebble Bed HTGR Loss of Cooling Event. Egypt. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/426356
Strydom, Gerhard. Tue .
"Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of a Pebble Bed HTGR Loss of Cooling Event". Egypt. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/426356.
@article{osti_1198171,
title = {Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of a Pebble Bed HTGR Loss of Cooling Event},
author = {Strydom, Gerhard},
abstractNote = {The Very High Temperature Reactor Methods Development group at the Idaho National Laboratory identified the need for a defensible and systematic uncertainty and sensitivity approach in 2009. This paper summarizes the results of an uncertainty and sensitivity quantification investigation performed with the SUSA code, utilizing the International Atomic Energy Agency CRP 5 Pebble Bed Modular Reactor benchmark and the INL code suite PEBBED-THERMIX. Eight model input parameters were selected for inclusion in this study, and after the input parameters variations and probability density functions were specified, a total of 800 steady state and depressurized loss of forced cooling (DLOFC) transient PEBBED-THERMIX calculations were performed. The six data sets were statistically analyzed to determine the 5% and 95% DLOFC peak fuel temperature tolerance intervals with 95% confidence levels. It was found that the uncertainties in the decay heat and graphite thermal conductivities were the most significant contributors to the propagated DLOFC peak fuel temperature uncertainty. No significant differences were observed between the results of Simple Random Sampling (SRS) or Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) data sets, and use of uniform or normal input parameter distributions also did not lead to any significant differences between these data sets.},
doi = {10.1155/2013/426356},
journal = {Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations},
number = ,
volume = 2013,
place = {Egypt},
year = {Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013},
month = {Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013}
}
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/426356
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of the Kozloduy pump trip test using coupled thermal–hydraulic 3D kinetics code
journal, June 2006
- Salah, Anis Bousbia; Kliem, Soeren; Rohde, Ulrich
- Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 236, Issue 12
Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the LOFT L2-5 test: Results of the BEMUSE programme
journal, December 2008
- de Crécy, A.; Bazin, P.; Glaeser, H.
- Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 238, Issue 12
Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits
journal, March 1941
- Wilks, S. S.
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 12, Issue 1
A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained with random and Latin hypercube sampling
journal, September 2005
- Helton, J. C.; Davis, F. J.; Johnson, J. D.
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 89, Issue 3
Automated Design and Optimization of Pebble-Bed Reactor Cores
journal, July 2010
- Gougar, H. D.; Ougouag, A. M.; Terry, W. K.
- Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 165, Issue 3
Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis
journal, October 2006
- Helton, J. C.; Johnson, J. D.; Sallaberry, C. J.
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 91, Issue 10-11
On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown
journal, June 1967
- Lilliefors, Hubert W.
- Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 62, Issue 318