DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: CO₂ emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies

Abstract

This paper explores a multi-model scenario ensemble to assess the impacts of idealized and non-idealized climate change stabilization policies on fossil fuel markets. Under idealized conditions climate policies significantly reduce coal use in the short- and long-term. Reductions in oil and gas use are much smaller, particularly until 2030, but revenues decrease much more because oil and gas prices are higher than coal prices. A first deviation from optimal transition pathways is delayed action that relaxes global emission targets until 2030 in accordance with the Copenhagen pledges. Fossil fuel markets revert back to the no-policy case: though coal use increases strongest, revenue gains are higher for oil and gas. To balance the carbon budget over the 21st century, the long-term reallocation of fossil fuels is significantly larger—twice and more—than the short-term distortion. This amplifying effect results from coal lock-in and inter-fuel substitution effects to balance the full-century carbon budget. The second deviation from the optimal transition pathway relaxes the global participation assumption. The result here is less clear-cut across models, as we find carbon leakage effects ranging from positive to negative because trade and substitution patterns of coal, oil, and gas differ across models. In summary, distortions of fossil fuelmore » markets resulting from relaxed short-term global emission targets are more important and less uncertain than the issue of carbon leakage from early mover action.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [3];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12]
  1. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam (Germany)
  2. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan (Italy)
  3. Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Developpement (CIRED), Paris (France)
  4. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Sevilla (Spain)
  5. International Institute for Applies Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg (Austria)
  6. International Institute for Applies Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg (Austria)Paul
  7. Paul Scherrer Inst. (PSI), Villigen (Switzerland)
  8. National Technical Univ. of Athens (Greece)
  9. National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) Tsukuba (Japan)
  10. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  11. Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE), Kyoto (Japan)
  12. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) Bilthoven (Netherlands); Utrecht Univ. (Netherlands). Copernicus Inst.
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1196203
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; 265139; 01LA11020B
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 90; Journal Issue: PA; Journal ID: ISSN 0040-1625
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; climate change mitigation policies; fossil fuel markets; Copenhagen accord; carbon leakage; inter-fuel substitution

Citation Formats

Bauer, Nico, Bosetti, Valentina, Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem, Kitous, Alban, McCollum, David, Mejean, Aurelie, Rao, Shilpa, Turton, Hal, Paroussos, Leonidas, Ashina, Shuichi, Calvin, Katherine, Wada, Kenichi, and van Vuuren, Detlef. CO₂ emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.009.
Bauer, Nico, Bosetti, Valentina, Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem, Kitous, Alban, McCollum, David, Mejean, Aurelie, Rao, Shilpa, Turton, Hal, Paroussos, Leonidas, Ashina, Shuichi, Calvin, Katherine, Wada, Kenichi, & van Vuuren, Detlef. CO₂ emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.009
Bauer, Nico, Bosetti, Valentina, Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem, Kitous, Alban, McCollum, David, Mejean, Aurelie, Rao, Shilpa, Turton, Hal, Paroussos, Leonidas, Ashina, Shuichi, Calvin, Katherine, Wada, Kenichi, and van Vuuren, Detlef. Thu . "CO₂ emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.009. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1196203.
@article{osti_1196203,
title = {CO₂ emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies},
author = {Bauer, Nico and Bosetti, Valentina and Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem and Kitous, Alban and McCollum, David and Mejean, Aurelie and Rao, Shilpa and Turton, Hal and Paroussos, Leonidas and Ashina, Shuichi and Calvin, Katherine and Wada, Kenichi and van Vuuren, Detlef},
abstractNote = {This paper explores a multi-model scenario ensemble to assess the impacts of idealized and non-idealized climate change stabilization policies on fossil fuel markets. Under idealized conditions climate policies significantly reduce coal use in the short- and long-term. Reductions in oil and gas use are much smaller, particularly until 2030, but revenues decrease much more because oil and gas prices are higher than coal prices. A first deviation from optimal transition pathways is delayed action that relaxes global emission targets until 2030 in accordance with the Copenhagen pledges. Fossil fuel markets revert back to the no-policy case: though coal use increases strongest, revenue gains are higher for oil and gas. To balance the carbon budget over the 21st century, the long-term reallocation of fossil fuels is significantly larger—twice and more—than the short-term distortion. This amplifying effect results from coal lock-in and inter-fuel substitution effects to balance the full-century carbon budget. The second deviation from the optimal transition pathway relaxes the global participation assumption. The result here is less clear-cut across models, as we find carbon leakage effects ranging from positive to negative because trade and substitution patterns of coal, oil, and gas differ across models. In summary, distortions of fossil fuel markets resulting from relaxed short-term global emission targets are more important and less uncertain than the issue of carbon leakage from early mover action.},
doi = {10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.009},
journal = {Technological Forecasting and Social Change},
number = PA,
volume = 90,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2015},
month = {Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2015}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The emissions gap between the Copenhagen pledges and the 2°C climate goal: Options for closing and risks that could widen the gap
journal, May 2011


Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations
journal, January 1996

  • Wigley, T. M. L.; Richels, R.; Edmonds, J. A.
  • Nature, Vol. 379, Issue 6562
  • DOI: 10.1038/379240a0

International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios
journal, December 2009


Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options
journal, January 2010

  • O'Neill, B. C.; Riahi, K.; Keppo, I.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903797106

Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation – an analysis with REMIND
journal, October 2013


Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy
journal, January 2015


Efficient Climate Policy in the Presence of Free Riders
journal, November 1994

  • Hoel, Michael
  • Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 27, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1994.1038

The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an Energy Modeling Forum study (EMF 29)
journal, December 2012


Leakage, Welfare, and Cost-Effectiveness of Carbon Policy
journal, May 2013

  • Baylis, Kathy; Fullerton, Don; Karney, Daniel H.
  • American Economic Review, Vol. 103, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.3.332

Linking Numerical and Analytical Models of Carbon Leakage
journal, May 2013


A Numerical Investigation of the Potential for Negative Emissions Leakage
journal, May 2013

  • Winchester, Niven; Rausch, Sebastian
  • American Economic Review, Vol. 103, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.3.320

Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals
journal, January 2015


Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies
journal, January 2015


Assessment of carbon leakage through the industry channel: The EU perspective
journal, January 2015


Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets
journal, January 2015


Assessment of carbon leakage through the industry channel: The EU perspective
journal, January 2015


Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations
journal, January 1996

  • Wigley, T. M. L.; Richels, R.; Edmonds, J. A.
  • Nature, Vol. 379, Issue 6562
  • DOI: 10.1038/379240a0

Works referencing / citing this record:

Simple Rules for Climate Policy and Integrated Assessment
journal, August 2018

  • van der Ploeg, Frederick; Rezai, Armon
  • Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 72, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10640-018-0280-6

Divestment prevails over the green paradox when anticipating strong future climate policies
journal, January 2018


Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets
journal, June 2018


The safe carbon budget
journal, January 2018


How to win public support for a global carbon tax
journal, January 2019


Wind Power Ramp Events Prediction with Hybrid Machine Learning Regression Techniques and Reanalysis Data
journal, November 2017

  • Cornejo-Bueno, Laura; Cuadra, Lucas; Jiménez-Fernández, Silvia
  • Energies, Vol. 10, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.3390/en10111784

Fossil fuel supply and climate policy: exploring the road less taken
journal, August 2018


Addressing multiple externalities from electricity generation: a case for EU renewable energy policy beyond 2020?
journal, October 2018

  • Lehmann, Paul; Sijm, Jos; Gawel, Erik
  • Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Vol. 21, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10018-018-0229-6

Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions
journal, May 2016

  • Geels, Frank W.; Berkhout, Frans; van Vuuren, Detlef P.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2980

A framework for identifying cross-border impacts of climate change on the energy sector
journal, July 2018


Simple Rules for Climate Policy and Integrated Assessment
journal, January 2018


Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century
journal, January 2017


Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets
journal, January 2015


Introduction to the AMPERE model intercomparison studies on the economics of climate stabilization
journal, January 2015