Reply to comment

The President's comments hit the nail right on the head with regard to the importance of the tech industry in 21st C economy.  But at the same time, there is a legitimate concern about how government incentives for tech investment artificially distort the market.  Having tech companies (like Solyndra) that exist solely because of a bureaucratic decision that the company should exist may (in many cases) not be doing the economy any favors in the long run.  In fact, it is diverting capital and resources away from start ups the market considers better risks.  Indeed, look at the auto bailouts.  Ford weathered the recent economic ddownturn with its forward thinking investment in the Ford Focus and other energy efficient cars, while GMC and Chrysler went down in flames for pursuing a short-term profit motive focussing on big, gas-guzzling autos.  The infusion of government cash to GM and Chrysler effectively lessened the consequences of those companies poor strategic choices, and lessened the reward to Ford for its winning strategy.

Reply

Comments policy

We welcome your comments and you submission of web links to the OSTIblog and look forward to civil discourse on a variety of science and technology information topics. We will review comments before posting and we reserve the right to not post comments.

We prefer comments and links that are specific to the subject of the OSTIblog post.

You are fully responsible for everything that you submit, and all posted comments are in the public domain. This means that your comments could be distributed widely.

You may comment anonymously. Your name, website, and email are not required.

By selecting the preview button, submit button, and/or by submitting anti-spam answers, you accept these terms and conditions.

(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.