Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Category:Yakima, WA | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yakima, WA Yakima, WA Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Yakima, WA" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total. SVFullServiceRestaurant Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVFullServiceRestauran... 61 KB SVHospital Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVHospital Yakima WA P... 58 KB SVLargeHotel Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeHotel Yakima WA... 58 KB SVLargeOffice Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeOffice Yakima W... 58 KB SVMediumOffice Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMediumOffice Yakima ... 57 KB SVMidriseApartment Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMidriseApartment Yak... 59 KB SVOutPatient Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVOutPatient Yakima WA... 63 KB SVPrimarySchool Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png

2

Yakima County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yakima County, Washington: Energy Resources Yakima County, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.543606°, -120.7558292° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.543606,"lon":-120.7558292,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

3

EA-1951: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade Transmission Line, Benton and Yakima Counties, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Bonneville Power Administration is preparing an EA to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed rebuild of the 34-mile Midway-Moxee transmission line in Benton and Yakima Counties, Washington.

4

Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-08)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 7, 2004 April 7, 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-08) memorandum David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWL-4 TO: Proposed Action: Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Under the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (M&E), the coho acclimation research task would be modified to include a new site located in the upper Yakima south of Cle Elum, WA. Project No.: F3204 Location: Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Yakima Fisheries Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (YFP EIS)

5

Comment on the future of the Bonneville Power Administration Jim G. Likes, Thurston County, WA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Comment on the future of the Bonneville Power Administration Jim G. Likes, Thurston County, WA Bonneville is a regional agency that markets federal hydropower and augments its power supply with market, everyday citizens, to pay illegally inflated power costs. Because of this, Bonneville should have the legal

6

EA-1855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln 855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA EA-1855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA Summary This EA (also known as DOE/EA-4406 or DOE/BP-4406) evaluates the potential environmental impacts from rebuilding the Creston-Bell No. 1 115-kV transmission line, including the replacement of wood poles and associated structural components and conductor and access road improvements. The 54-mile long, wood pole line extends from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Creston substation to the BPA Bell substation near Spokane in Lincoln and Spokane Counties, Washington. Additional information about this project is available on the BPA website. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download

7

Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

it: EE 000 0853 it: EE 000 0853 Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Kitsap Built Green Projects B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Kitsap County Building Retrofits and Energy Efficiency Upgrades (Green Jobs Initiative) B5.1 except geothermal Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Prohibited: Any implementation of geothermal projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE. Geothermal projects are to be provided to DOE for analysis. Energy Efficiency Implementation and Strategy A9, All, B5.1 None Energy Services Corps A9, All, B5.1

8

DOE/EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project --Use of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities (03/08/00)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 8, 2000 March 8, 2000 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KECN-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-03) David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWN-4 Proposed Action: Yakima Fisheries Project - Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities PL-6: F3204 Location: Yakima, Yakima County, Washington; and Easton, Kittitas County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of several salmonid species in the Yakima and Klickitat river basins. BPA analyzed environmental impacts of research and supplementation projects in the Yakima basin in an

9

Characterization of the environmental fate of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kaurstaki (Btk) after pest eradication efforts in Seattle, WA and Fairfax county, VA  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Understanding the fate of biological agents in the environment will be critical to recovery and restoration efforts after a biological attack. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is conducting experiments in the Seattle, WA and Fairfax County, VA areas to study agent fate in urban environments. As part of their gypsy moth suppression efforts, Washington State and Fairfax County have sprayed Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Btk), a common organic pesticide for decades. Many of the spray zones have been in or near urban areas. LANL has collected surface and bulk samples from historical Seattle spray zones to characterize how long Btk persists at detectable levels in the environment, and how long it remains viable in different environmental matrices. This work will attempt to address three questions. First, how long does the agent remain viable at detectable levels? Second, what is the approximate magnitude and duration of resuspension? And third, does the agent transport into buildings? Data designed to address the first question will be presented. Preliminary results indicate Btk remains viable in the environment for at least two years.

Ticknor, Lawrence [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Van Cuyk, Sheila M [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Deshpande, Alina [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Omberg, Kristin M [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Yakima Fisheries Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

BPA proposes to fund several fishery-related activities in the Yakima River Basin. These activities, known as the Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP), would be jointly managed by the State of Washington and the Yakima Indian Nation. The YFP is included in the Northwest Power Planning Council`s (Council`s) fish and wildlife program. The Council selected the Yakima River system for attention because fisheries resources are severely reduced from historical levels and because there is a significant potential for enhancement of these resources. BPA`s proposed action is to fund (1) information gathering on the implementation of supplementation techniques and on feasibility of reintroducing coho salmon in an environment where native populations have become extinct; (2) research activities based on continuous assessment, feedback and improvement of research design and activities ({open_quotes}adaptive management{close_quotes}); and (3) die construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities for supplementing populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon. Examined in addition to No Action are two alternatives for action: (1) supplementation of depressed natural populations of upper Yakima spring chinook and (2) that same supplementation plus a study to determine the feasibility of reestablishing naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 is the preferred action. A central hatchery would be built for either alternative, as well as three sites with six raceways each for acclimation and release of spring chinook smolts. Major issues examined in the Revised Draft EIS include potential impacts of the project on genetic and ecological resources of existing fish populations, on water quality and quantity, on threatened and endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act, and on the recreational fishery.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Washington (State). Dept. of Fish and Wildlife; Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

Yakima Basin Fish Passage Project, Phase 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Implementation of the Yakima Basin Fish Passage Project -- Phase 2 would significantly improve the production of anadromous fish in the Yakima River system. The project would provide offsite mitigation and help to compensate for lower Columbia River hydroelectric fishery losses. The Phase 2 screens would allow greater numbers of juvenile anadromous fish to survive. As a consequence, there would be higher returns of adult salmon and steelhead to the Yakima River. The proposed action would play an integral part in the overall Yakima River anadromous fish enhancement program (fish passage improvement, habitat enhancement, hatchery production increases, and harvest management). These would be environmental benefits associated with implementation of the Fish Passage and Protective Facilities Phase 2 Project. Based on the evaluation presented in this assessment, there would be no significant adverse environmental impacts if the proposed action was carried forward. No significant adverse environmental effects have been identified from construction and operation of the Yakima Phase 2 fish passage project. Proper design and implementation of the project will ensure no adverse effects will occur. Based on the information in this environmental analysis, BPA's and Reclamation's proposal to construct these facilities does not constitute a major Federal action that could significantly affect the quality of the human environment. 8 refs., 4 figs., 6 tabs.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

County  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pine County Pine County White Pine County Board of County Commissioners Board of County Commissioners February 10, 1998 W. Eric J. Fygi U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel GC-52 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20585 Subject: Department of Energy (DOE) Price-Anderson Act Comments from White Pine County, Nevada Dear Mr. Fygi: Thank you for providing White Pine County with the opportunity to comment concerning the continuation or modifications of the provisions of the Price-Anderson Act. We understand that these comments will be used to assist the Department of Energy in preparing a required report to Congress. You will note in reviewing our comments that the views of many "Affected Units of Government" in Nevada are similar to each other and that we have worked together in developing

13

DOE/EIS-0169-SA-04: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project--Construction/modification upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery and the Marion Drain Hatchery Facilities (11/7/00)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 7, 2000 November 7, 2000 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-04) memorandum David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWN-4 TO : Proposed Action: Yakima Fisheries Project - Construction/modification upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery and the Marion Drain Hatchery facilities. Project No.: F3204 Location: Prosser and Toppenish, Yakima County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of several salmonid species in the Yakima and Klickitat river basins. BPA analyzed

14

COUNTY\  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA MEMBERS STAFF SUSAN W. DUDLEY, CHAIRMAN BEVERLY J. RELYEA GARY O'CONNOR, VICE CHAIRMAN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT BEN VILJOEN, LIQUOR BOARD (702)485-3406 January 20, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel GCS-52 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA CONCERNING THE CONTINUATION OR MODIFICATION OF DOE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT Dear Sirs: The DOE Price-Anderson indemnification is intended to provide coverage for contractors for the benefit of any victims of a nuclear accident or incident or a precautionary evacuation arising from activity under a DOE contracts. The public perception is that if there is a nuclear accident resulting in a dispersal of

15

Bonneville Power Administration Yakima Fisheries Project; 13Sept1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION YAKIMA FISHERIES PROJECT (YFP) RECORD OF DECISION Summary. As Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), I have decided to implement Alternative 2 of the proposed Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP) to undertake fishery research and mitigation activities in the Yakima River Basin in south- central Washington. The project responds directly to a need for knowledge of viable means to rebuild and maintain naturally spawning anadromous fish stocks in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 would experimentally supplement depressed populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon that spawn naturally, as well as undertake a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing a naturally spawning population and significant fall fishery for coho salmon (now eliminated in the Basin).

16

Yakima River Spring Chinook Enhancement Study, 1991 Final Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The population of Yakima River spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha) has been drastically reduced from historic levels reported to be as high as 250,000 adults (Smoker 1956). This reduction is the result of a series of problems including mainstem Columbia dams, dams within the Yakima itself, severely reduced flows due to irrigation diversions, outmigrant loss in irrigation canals, increased thermal and sediment loading, and overfishing. Despite these problems, the return of spring chinook to the Yakima River has continued at levels ranging from 854 to 9,442 adults since 1958. In October 1982, the Bonneville Power Administration contracted the Yakima Indian Nation to develop methods to increase production of spring chinook in the Yakima system. The Yakima Nation's current enhancement policy attempts to maintain the genetic integrity of the spring chinook stock native to the Yakima Basin. Relatively small numbers of hatchery fish have been released into the basin in past years. The goal of this study was to develop data that will be used to present management alternatives for Yakima River spring chinook. A major objective of this study is to determine the distribution, abundance and survival of wild Yakima River spring chinook. The second major objective of this study is to determine the relative effectiveness of different methods of hatchery supplementation. The last three major objectives of the study are to locate and define areas in the watershed that may be used for the rearing of spring chinook; to define strategies for enhancing natural production of spring chinook in the Yakima River; and to determine the physical and biological limitations on production within the system. 47 refs., 89 figs., 67 tabs.

Fast, David E.

1991-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-05) 9/20/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 20, 2002 September 20, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-05) memorandum David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWL-4 TO: Proposed Action: Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Under the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (M&E), the domestication selection research task would be modified to include a hatchery control line, maintained entirely by spawning hatchery-origin fish. Project No.: F3204 Location: Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of

18

EA-0941: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration 41: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project, Washington EA-0941: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy's Bonneville Power Administration to fund that portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to the Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project (Project) in a cooperative effort with the Yakama Indian Nation and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The proposed action would allow the sponsors to ensure property and conduct wildlife management activities for the Project within the boundaries of the Yakama Indian Reservation. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time.

19

Acquisition protects fish habitat in Yakima County Fact Sheet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

facilities. The property would be owned and managed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. September 2008 Land to get management plan Once this property has been...

20

I Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I I Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian - Restoration Project \ , Final Environmental Assessment DOENo. 0941 c Bonneville Power kdmi.nistration, Yakama Indian Nation, Bureawof Indian Affairs % J e;r%mBlYTlON OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED DISCLAIMER This report was .prepared as a n account of work sponsored by an agency of t h e United States Government. Neither t h e United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes a n y legal liability or responsibility for t h e accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Yakima Habitat Improvement Project Master Plan, Technical Report 2003.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Yakima Urban Growth Area (UGA) is a developing and growing urban area in south-central Washington. Despite increased development, the Yakima River and its tributaries within the UGA continue to support threatened populations of summer steelhead and bull trout as well as a variety of non-listed salmonid species. In order to provide for the maintenance and recovery of these species, while successfully planning for the continued growth and development within the UGA, the City of Yakima has undertaken the Yakima Habitat Improvement Project. The overall goal of the project is to maintain, preserve, and restore functioning fish and wildlife habitat within and immediately surrounding the Yakima UGA over the long term. Acquisition and protection of the fish and wildlife habitat associated with key properties in the UGA will prevent future subdivision along riparian corridors, reduce further degradation or removal of riparian habitat, and maintain or enhance the long term condition of aquatic habitat. By placing these properties in long-term protection, the threat of development from continued growth in the urban area will be removed. To most effectively implement the multi-year habitat acquisition and protection effort, the City has developed this Master Plan. The Master Plan provides the structure and guidance for future habitat acquisition and restoration activities to be performed within the Yakima Urban Area. The development of this Master Plan also supports several Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs) of the NOAA Fisheries 2000 Biological Opinion (BiOp), as well as the Water Investment Action Agenda for the Yakima Basin, local planning efforts, and the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority's 2000 Fish and Wildlife Program. This Master Plan also provides the framework for coordination of the Yakima Habitat Improvement Project with other fish and wildlife habitat acquisition and protection activities currently being implemented in the area. As a result of the planning effort leading to this Master Plan, a Technical Working Group (TWG) was established that represents most, if not all, fish and wildlife agencies/interests in the subbasin. This TWG met regularly throughout the planning process to provide input and review and was instrumental in the development of this plan. Preparation of this plan included the development of a quantitative prioritization process to rank 40,000 parcels within the Urban Growth Area based on the value of fish and wildlife habitat each parcel provided. Biological and physical criteria were developed and applied to all parcels through a GIS-based prioritization model. In the second-phase of the prioritization process, the TWG provided local expert knowledge and review of the properties. In selecting the most critical areas within the Urban Growth Area for protection, this project assessed the value of fish and wildlife habitat on the Yakima River. Well-developed habitat acquisition efforts (e.g., Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project by the Bureau of Reclamation and Yakama Nation acquisition projects) are already underway on the Yakima River mainstem. These efforts, however, face several limitations in protection of floodplain function that could be addressed through the support of the Yakima Habitat Improvement Project. This Master Plan integrates tributary habitat acquisition efforts with those ongoing on the Yakima River to best benefit fish and wildlife in the Urban Growth Area. The parcel ranking process identified 25 properties with the highest fish and wildlife value for habitat acquisition in the Yakima Urban Area. These parcels contain important fish and wildlife corridors on Ahtanum and Wide Hollow Creeks and the Naches River. The fifteen highest-ranking parcels of the 25 parcels identified were considered very high priority for protection of fish and wildlife habitat. These 15 parcels were subsequently grouped into four priority acquisition areas. This Master Plan outlines a four-year schedule for acquisition, protection, and restoration of the 25 highest ranked prop

Golder Associates, Inc.

2003-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

22

Yakima Fisheries Project : Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

BPA proposes to fund several fishery-related activities in the Yakima River Basin. The Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP), included in the Northwest Power Planning Council`s fish and wildlife program, would be jointly managed by the State of Washington and the Yakima Indian Nation. Fisheries resources in the Yakima River are severely reduced from historical levels and there is a significant potential for enhancement of these resources. BPA`s proposed action is to fund (1) information gathering on the implementation of supplementation techniques and on feasibility of reintroducing coho salmon in an environment where native populations have become extinct; (2) research activities based on continuous assessment, feedback and improvement of research design and activities ({open_quotes}adaptive management{close_quotes}); and (3) the construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities for supplementing populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon. The project has been considerably revised from the original proposal described in the first draft EIS. Examined in addition to No Action (which would leave present anadromous fisheries resources unchanged in the, Basin) are two alternatives for action: (1) supplementation of depressed natural populations of upper Yakima spring chinook and (2) that same supplementation plus a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing (via stock imported from another basin) naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 has been identified as the preferred action. Major issues examined in the Revised Draft EIS include potential impacts of the project on genetic and ecological resources of existing fish populations, on water quality and quantity, on threatened and endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act, and on the recreational fishery.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

73: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration 73: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX SUMMARY This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to provide financial assistance for a project proposed by NRG Energy, Inc (NRG). DOE selected NRG's proposed W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project for a financial assistance award through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Program. NRG would design, construct and operate a commercial-scale carbon dioxide (CO2) capture facility at its existing W.A. Parish Generating Station in Fort Bend County, Texas; deliver the CO2 via a new pipeline to the existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson

24

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX SUMMARY This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to provide financial assistance for a project proposed by NRG Energy, Inc (NRG). DOE selected NRG's proposed W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project for a financial assistance award through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Program. NRG would design, construct and operate a commercial-scale carbon dioxide (CO2) capture facility at its existing W.A. Parish Generating Station in Fort Bend County, Texas; deliver the CO2 via a new pipeline to the existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson

25

Yakima River Spring Chinook Enhancement Study, 1988 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Smolt outmigration was monitored at Wapatox on the Naches River and Prosser on the lower Yakima. The spring outmigration at Wapatox was estimated to be smolts. The survival from egg to smolt was calculated using the 1986 redd counts and the 1988 smolt outmigration at Prosser. The smolt to adult survival was calculated based on the 1983 smolt outmigration estimated at Prosser and the 1984 return of jacks (3 year old fish), the 1985 return of four year old adults, and the 1986 return of five year old fish to the Yakima River. 13 refs., 4 figs., 47 tabs.

Fast, David E.

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

EIS-0397: Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes BPA's decision to modify funding to the existing Lyle Falls Fishway on the lower Klickitat River in Klickitat County, WA. The proposed project would help BPA meet its off-site mitigation responsibilities for anadromous fish affected by the development of the Federal Columbia River Power System and increase overall fish production in the Columbia Basin.

27

Category:Seattle, WA | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Seattle, WA Seattle, WA Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Seattle, WA" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total. SVFullServiceRestaurant Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVFullServiceRestauran... 60 KB SVHospital Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVHospital Seattle WA ... 58 KB SVLargeHotel Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeHotel Seattle W... 57 KB SVLargeOffice Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeOffice Seattle ... 57 KB SVMediumOffice Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMediumOffice Seattle... 61 KB SVMidriseApartment Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMidriseApartment Sea... 58 KB SVOutPatient Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVOutPatient Seattle W... 63 KB

28

GRR/Section 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water Right < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water Right 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water Right.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.80 RCW 90.03.380 90.03.390 RCW 90.44.100 Triggers None specified In 1997, the Washington Legislature authorized the creation of water conservancy boards through the enactment of Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.80 to expedite the administrative process for voluntary water right transfers within individual counties. In counties where a water

29

20121114 Riverton drinking wa...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Where Does My Drinking Water Come From? Where Does My Drinking Water Come From? Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site F A C T S H E E T ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF This fact sheet provides information about the Alternative Water Supply System and domestic wells at the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 Title I processing site at Riverton, Wyoming. The Riverton site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Where Is the Riverton Site? The former Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site is in Fremont County, 2 miles southwest of the town of Riverton and within the boundaries of the Wind River Indian Reservation (Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone). Why Is It a "Site"? A uranium- and vanadium-ore-processing mill operated on the property from 1958 to 1963. Milling operations created

30

WA_1993_040_REGENTS_OF_THE_UNIVERSITY_OF_CALIFORNIA_Waiver_o...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WA1993040REGENTSOFTHEUNIVERSITYOFCALIFORNIAWaivero.pdf WA1993040REGENTSOFTHEUNIVERSITYOFCALIFORNIAWaivero.pdf WA1993040REGENTSOFTHEUNIVERSITYOFCALIFORNI...

31

WA_00_030_ASE_AMERICAS_Request_to_Assign_Title_to_Waiver-Inv...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WA1995019DONNELLYCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA1995018OPTICALCOATINGLABORATORYINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA03032RWESCHOTTSOLARINCWaiverof...

32

Reproductive Ecology of Yakima River Hatchery and Wild Spring Chinook; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation Report 3 of 7, 2003-2004 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the third in a series of annual reports that address reproductive ecological research and comparisons of hatchery and wild origin spring chinook in the Yakima River basin. Data have been collected prior to supplementation to characterize the baseline reproductive ecology, demographics and phenotypic traits of the unsupplemented upper Yakima population, however this report focuses on data collected on hatchery and wild spring chinook returning in 2003; the third year of hatchery adult returns. This report is organized into three chapters, with a general introduction preceding the first chapter and summarizes data collected between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2004 in the Yakima basin. Summaries of each of the chapters in this report are included below. A major component of determining supplementation success in the Yakima Klickitat Fishery Project's spring chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) program is an increase in natural production. Within this context, comparing upper Yakima River hatchery and wild origin fish across traits such as sex ratio, age composition, size-at-age, fecundity, run timing and gamete quality is important because these traits directly affect population productivity and individual fish fitness which determine a population's productivity.

Knudsen, Curtis (Oncorh Consulting, Olympia, WA)

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Genetic Studies; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2001-2002 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In chapter 1 we report on studies of the population genetic structure, using DNA microsatellites, of steelhead collected from different locations in the Yakima River basin (Roza Dam, Ahtanum Creek, Toppenish Creek, and Satus Creek) in 2000 and 2001. Of 28 pairwise tests of genotypic differentiation, only the 2000 and 2001 Roza Dam collections and the 2000 and 2001 Satus Creek collections did not exhibit significant differences. Similarly, pairwise tests of genetic differentiation (FST) were significant for all comparisons except the between-years comparisons of Roza Dam, Toppenish Creek, and Satus Creek collections. All tests between populations sampled from different localities were significant, indicating that these collections represent genetically differentiated stocks. In chapter 2 we report on genetic comparisons, again using microsatellites, of the three spring chinook populations in the Yakima basin (Upper Yakima, Naches, and American) with respect to our ability to be able to estimate the proportions of the three populations in mixed smolt samples collected at Chandler. We evaluated this both in terms of mixed fishery analysis, where proportions are estimated, but the likely provenance of any particular fish is unknown, and classification, where an attempt is made to assign individual fish to their population of origin. Simulations were done over the entire ranged of stock proportions observed in the Yakima basin in the last 20+ years. Stock proportions can be estimated very accurately by either method. Chapter 3 reports on our ongoing effort at cryopreserving semen from wild Upper Yakima spring chinook. In 2002, semen from 91 males, more than 50% of those spawned, was cryopreserved. Representation over the spawning season was excellent. Chapters 4,5, and 6 all relate to the continuing development of the domestication study design. Chapter 4 details the ISRP consultations and evolution of the design from last year's preferred alternative to the current plan of using the Naches population as a wild control, and maintaining a hatchery-only control line alongside the supplemented line. During discussions this year a major issue was the possible impact to the research and to the supplementation effort, of gene flow from precocious males from the hatchery control line into the supplemented line. At the end of the contracting period, this issue still had not been resolved. Along with the discussion of development of the domestication research design, chapter 4 presents the current monitoring plan document, with discussion of the approach to the various traits to be analyzed. Chapters 5 and 6 deal with experimental power of the domestication monitoring design. There is still much work to be done on power, but in chapter 5 we explore our power to detect differences among the three lines for traits measured on individual adults. Power was found to be quite good for effects of 5% per generation over three generations for traits having a coefficient of variation (CV) of 10-20%, but low if the CV was 50%. Power is higher for comparisons between the hatchery control line and supplemented line than between the supplemented line and the wild control, a consequence of trying to avoid heavy impacts to the Naches population. Power could be improved considerably improved by sampling more Naches fish in years of high abundance. Chapter 6 presents the same power analysis, but attempts to explore the effect of precocious males from the hatchery control line spawning in the wild. It is clear that if gene flow from precocious males is more than one or two percent that the between line comparisons will be biased, making the supplemented line appear to be more similar to the hatchery control line than it should and more different from the wild control line than it should. However, it was also clear that more analysis is desirable, as the heightened or diminished power is really just an enhancement or reduction of a real difference. A more straightforward analysis of the proportion of observed differences that can be attributed to precoci

Busack, Craig A.; Fritts, Anthony L.; Loxterman, Janet (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

49: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA 49: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA SUMMARY This EA analyzes the potential environmental effects of a proposal by the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snowhomish County, Washington to construct and operate the Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project. The proposed 680-kilowatt project would be located on the east side of Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, Washington, about 1 kilometer west of Whidbey Island, entirely within Island County, Washington. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the lead agency. DOE is a cooperating agency. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 9, 2013 EA-1949: FERC Notice of Availability Errata Sheet

35

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Genetic Studies; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2005-2006 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report covers one of many topics under the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project's Monitoring and Evaluation Program (YKFPME). The YKFPME is funded under two BPA contracts, one for the Yakama Nation and the other for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (Contract number 22370, Project Number 1995-063-25). A comprehensive summary report for all of the monitoring and evaluation topics will be submitted after all of the topical reports are completed. This approach to reporting enhances the ability of people to get the information they want, enhances timely reporting of results, and provides a condensed synthesis of the whole YKFPME. The current report was completed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Busack, Craig A.; Fritts, Anthony L.; Kassler, Todd (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Reproductive Ecology of Yakima River Hatchery and Wild Spring Chinook; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is intended to satisfy two concurrent needs: (1) provide a contract deliverable from Oncorh Consulting to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), with emphasis on identification of salient results of value to ongoing Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) planning and (2) summarize results of research that have broader scientific relevance. This is the fourth in a series of reports that address reproductive ecological research and monitoring of spring chinook populations in the Yakima River basin. This annual report summarizes data collected between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2005 and includes analyses of historical baseline data, as well. Supplementation success in the Yakima Klickitat Fishery Project's (YKFP) spring chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) program is defined as increasing natural production and harvest opportunities, while keeping adverse ecological interactions and genetic impacts within acceptable bounds (Busack et al. 1997). Within this context demographics, phenotypic traits, and reproductive ecology have significance because they directly affect natural productivity. In addition, significant changes in locally adapted traits due to hatchery influence, i.e. domestication, would likely be maladaptive resulting in reduced population productivity and fitness (Taylor 1991; Hard 1995). Thus, there is a need to study demographic and phenotypic traits in the YKFP in order to understand hatchery and wild population productivity, reproductive ecology, and the effects of domestication (Busack et al. 1997). Tracking trends in these traits over time is also a critical aspect of domestication monitoring (Busack et al. 2004) to determine whether trait changes have a genetic component and, if so, are they within acceptable limits. The first chapter of this report compares first generation hatchery and wild upper Yakima River spring chinook returns over a suite of life-history, phenotypic and demographic traits. The second chapter deals specifically with identification of putative populations of wild spring chinook in the Yakima River basin based on differences in quantitative and genetic traits. The third chapter is a progress report on gametic traits and progeny produced by upper Yakima River wild and hatchery origin fish spawned in 2004 including some comparisons with Little Naches River fish. In the fourth chapter, we present a progress report on comparisons naturally spawning wild and hatchery fish in the upper Yakima River and in an experimental spawning channel at CESRF in 2004. The chapters in this report are in various stages of development. Chapters One and Two will be submitted for peer reviewed publication. Chapters Three and Four should be considered preliminary and additional fieldwork and/or analysis are in progress related to these topics. Readers are cautioned that any preliminary conclusions are subject to future revision as more data and analytical results become available.

Knudsen, Curtis M. (Oncorh Consulting, Olympia, WA); Schroder, Steven L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA); Johnston, Mark V. (yakama Nation, Toppenish, WA)

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Acquisition of fish and wildlife habitat along Upper Yakima River  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

factsheet The Bonneville Power Admin- istration is working with the Yakama Nation to acquire and manage a 105 acre parcel in Kittitas County, Washington. BPA funds the acquisition...

38

Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects August 11, 2010 - 1:01pm Addthis An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, and the energy efficient windows framed behind her. | Photo courtesy of Kitsap County, WA | An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, and the energy efficient windows framed behind her. | Photo courtesy of Kitsap County, WA | Maya Payne Smart Former Writer for Energy Empowers, EERE Autumn Salamack's career moved in a welcome new direction when she became the resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, in

39

Yakima River Species Interactions Studies; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is intended to satisfy two concurrent needs: (1) provide a contract deliverable from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) to the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), with emphasis on identification of salient results of value to ongoing Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) planning, and (2) summarize results of research that have broader scientific relevance. This is the thirteenth of a series of progress reports that address species interactions research and supplementation monitoring of fishes in response to supplementation of salmon and steelhead in the upper Yakima River basin (Hindman et al. 1991; McMichael et al. 1992; Pearsons et al. 1993; Pearsons et al. 1994; Pearsons et al. 1996; Pearsons et al. 1998, Pearsons et al. 1999, Pearsons et al. 2001a, Pearsons et al. 2001b, Pearsons et al. 2002, Pearsons et al. 2003, Pearsons et al. 2004). Journal articles and book chapters have also been published from our work (McMichael 1993; Martin et al. 1995; McMichael et al. 1997; McMichael and Pearsons 1998; McMichael et al. 1998; Pearsons and Fritts 1999; McMichael et al. 1999; McMichael et al. 1999; Pearsons and Hopley 1999; Ham and Pearsons 2000; Ham and Pearsons 2001; Amaral et al. 2001; McMichael and Pearsons 2001; Pearsons 2002, Fritts and Pearsons 2004, Pearsons et al. in press, Major et al. in press). This progress report summarizes data collected between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004. These data were compared to findings from previous years to identify general trends and make preliminary comparisons. Interactions between fish produced as part of the YKFP, termed target species or stocks, and other species or stocks (non-target taxa) may alter the population status of non-target species or stocks. This may occur through a variety of mechanisms, such as competition, predation, and interbreeding (Pearsons et al. 1994; Busack et al. 1997; Pearsons and Hopley 1999). Furthermore, the success of a supplementation program may be limited by strong ecological interactions such as predation or competition (Busack et al. 1997). Our work has adapted to new information needs as the YKFP has evolved. Initially, our work focused on interactions between anadromous steelhead and resident rainbow trout (for explanation see Pearsons et al. 1993), then interactions between spring chinook salmon and rainbow trout, and recently interactions between spring chinook salmon and highly valued non-target taxa (NTT; e.g., bull trout); and interactions between strong interactor taxa (e.g., those that may strongly influence the abundance of spring chinook salmon; e.g., smallmouth bass) and spring chinook salmon. The change in emphasis to spring chinook salmon has largely been influenced by the shift in the target species planned for supplementation (Bonneville Power Administration et al. 1996; Fast and Craig 1997). Originally, steelhead and spring chinook salmon were proposed to be supplemented simultaneously (Clune and Dauble 1991). However, due in part to the uncertainties associated with interactions between steelhead and rainbow trout, spring chinook and coho salmon were supplemented before steelhead. This redirection in the species to be supplemented has prompted us to prioritize interactions between spring chinook and rainbow trout, while beginning to investigate other ecological interactions of concern. Prefacility monitoring of variables such as rainbow trout density, distribution, and size structure was continued and monitoring of other NTT was initiated in 1997. This report is organized into five chapters that represent major topics associated with monitoring stewardship, utilization, and strong interactor taxa. Chapter 1 reports the results of non-target taxa monitoring after the sixth release of hatchery salmon smolts in the upper Yakima River Basin. Chapter 2 reports on the impacts of supplementation and reintroduction of salmon to trout. Chapter 2 was submitted as a manuscript to the North American Journal of Fisheries Management. Chapter 3 is an essay that describes the problems associated

Pearsons, Todd N.; Temple, Gabriel M.; Fritts, Anthony L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Relative risk site evaluations for Yakima Training Center  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

All 20 U.S. Army Yakima Training Center (YTC) sites evaluated were given a `low` relative risk. At Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 22, a `minimum` soils contaminant hazard factor was assigned even though 6,700 mg/kg TPH-diesel was found in surface soil. SWMU 22 is physically located on top of and with the fence surrounding Area of Concern (AOC) 4. Because the diesel is most likely associated with AOC 4, and plans are to clean up AOC 4, any further actions regarding these contaminated soils should be addressed as part of the planned actions for AOC 4. Contaminant hazard factors of `moderate` were assigned to the soil pathway for SWMUs 4 and 7 because dieldrin and arsenic, respectively, were found in surface soil samples at concentrations exceeding standards. A `moderate` contaminant hazard factor was also assigned to the sediment pathway for AOC 1 because arsenic detected in sediments in `Larry`s Swimming Pool` exceeded the standard. All other contaminant hazard factors were rated as minimal. The receptor factor for all sites and pathways was rated `limited,` except for SWMU 54 in which the groundwater receptor factor was rated `potential.` A `potential` rating was assigned to the groundwater pathway at this site to be conservative. The site is located on the south side of the syncline axis where the unconfined aquifer may be present and there are no monitoring wells at the site to confirm or deny the presence of groundwater contamination.

Smith, R.M.; Whelan, G.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Yakima River Basin Phase II Fish Screen Evaluations, 2003  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2003, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 23 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the Nation Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2003, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve juvenile fish passage conditions. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well greased and operative. (5) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites.

Vucelick, Jessica A.; McMichael, Geoffrey A.; Chamness, Mickie A.

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2013-013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

& Publications WA98023McDERMOTTTECHNOLOGYINCWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA96016AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA96004GECORPORATERESEARCHand...

43

WA_1995_018_OPTICAL_COATING_LABORATORY_INC_Waiver_of_Domesti...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Publications WA1995019DONNELLYCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA1994034AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1995009AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICAL...

44

WA_04_057_CHEMICAL_RESEARCH_AND_LICENSING_CO_Waiver_of_Paten...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

& Publications WA04064VELOCYSINCWaiverofPatentRgithsUnderaDOECo.pdf WA04063AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04028AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICAL...

45

WA_98_023_McDERMOTT_TECHNOLOGY_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fo...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

WA06013McDERMOTTTECHNOLOGYINCWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA00018PRAXAIRWaiveofDomesticandForeignInventionRi.pdf WA00007COMBUSTIONENGINEERINGINCW...

46

WA_02_021_H2GEN_INNOVATIONS_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_P...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WA02046QUESTAAIRTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA04034NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiver...

47

WA_04_009_ROCKWELL_SCIENTIFIC_CO_Wailve_of_Domestic_And_Fore...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WA1995019DONNELLYCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA1995018OPTICALCOATINGLABORATORYINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA00030ASEAMERICASRequesttoAssign...

48

WA_1995_019_DONNELLY_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WA00030ASEAMERICASRequesttoAssignTitletoWaiver-Inv.pdf WA1995018OPTICALCOATINGLABORATORYINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA04009ROCKWELLSCIENTIFICCOWailve...

49

EIS-0330: Wallula Power Project, Walla Walla County, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes DOE's proposal to construct, operate, maintain, and decontaminate and decommission two depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF 6) conversion facilities, at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky.

50

Vegetation survey of knapweed on the Yakima Training Center - 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes and discusses the results of a vegetation survey conducted in 1992 on a portion of the Yakima Training Center (YTC). Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) conducted this survey and a similar survey in 1991 for the U.S. Department of the Army. The objectives of the survey were to evaluate the impact of the herbicide picloram on forbs where aerial applications of picloram were made in 1988, 1989, and 1991 to control knapweed infestations. Forbs are of special interest because they are an important part of the spring and summer diet of the western sage grouse, which is a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service candidate species for the threatened and endangered list. We also conducted a limited evaluation of the effectiveness of the spray program in controlling the spread of knapweed. Percent plant canopy cover and number of forbs were measured on 120 transacts on the herbicide-treated and untreated control areas. Herbicide treatment in 1991 resulted in a significant reduction in knapweed based on percent cover and density. The treatment areas also all had lower percent canopy cover of perennial forbs and fewer perennial forbs compared to control areas. Canopy cover of shrubs and annual, biennial, and perennial forbs measured on the YTC increased between the 1991 and 1992 survey, which may indicate a recovery of these vegetation types after disturbance. These increases also could reflect the mild 1992 winter and superior growing conditions in the spring of 1992. We recommend that these vegetation transacts continue to be monitored for an additional growing season to evaluate (1) whether knapweed increases to its previous abundance in the 1991 herbicide-treated area, (2) the efficacy of herbicide application on transacts along roadways, and (3) the increase in invasive annuals in herbicide-treated areas and the possible effects on community vegetation structure and sage grouse habitat.

Downs, J.L.; Cadoret, N.A.; Rickard, W.H.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

GRR/Section 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the necessary procedure when a developer discovers human remains on a project site. In Washington, every person has the duty to notify the coroner upon the discovery of any human remains in the most expeditious manner possible. The Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) handles the disposition of non-forensic remains, while the county coroner handles the disposition of

52

Comparing the Reproductive Success of Yakima River Hatchery-and Wild-Origin Spring Chinook; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2000-2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the Yakima Spring Chinook supplementation program, wild fish are brought into the Cle Elum Hatchery, artificially crossed, reared, transferred to acclimation sites, and released into the upper Yakima River as smolts. When these fish mature and return to the Yakima River most of them will be allowed to spawn naturally; a few, however, will be brought back to the hatchery and used for research purposes. In order for this supplementation approach to be successful, hatchery-origin fish must be able to spawn and produce offspring under natural conditions. Recent investigations on salmonid fishes have indicated that exposure to hatchery environments during juvenile life may cause significant behavioral, physiological, and morphological changes in adult fish. These changes appear to reduce the reproductive competence of hatchery fish. In general, males are more affected than females; species with prolonged freshwater rearing periods are more strongly impacted than those with shorter rearing periods; and stocks that have been exposed to artificial culture for multiple generations are more impaired than those with a relatively short exposure history to hatchery conditions.

Schroder, S.L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA); Knudsen, C.M. (Oncorh Consulting, Olympia, WA); Rau, J.A. (Cle Elum Supplementation Research, Cle Elum, WA)

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

EIS-0333: Maiden Wind Farm Project, Benton and Yakima Counties, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes BPAs proposed action to execute power purchase and interconnection agreements for the purpose of acquiring up to 50 average megawatts (aMW) (up to about 200 MW) of the project developers proposed Maiden Wind Farm.

54

RAPID/Roadmap/11-WA-a | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Toolkit About Bulk Transmission Geothermal Solar Tools Contribute Contact Us 11-WA-a State Cultural Considerations Overview 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview.pdf...

55

Fabricate and Install Yakima Basin Phase II Fish Screens; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2006 Final Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The goal of this project was to restore ESA listed and resident fish stocks within the Yakima Basin by preventing mortality and/or injury to all life stages of anadromous and resident fish at irrigation diversions. This goal is being accomplished through an on-going effort by the Yakima Basin Phase II Technical Work Group (TWG), which is comprised of local, state, federal, tribal and private groups who prioritize and assign screening projects.

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff, (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Habitat Program, Yakima, WA)

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

WA_1995_009_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_INC_Waiver_of_Domesti...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1995009AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1995009AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti...

57

WA_96_016_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

16AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA96016AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA96016AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomest...

58

WA_1995_014_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_INC_Waiver_of_Domesti...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1995014AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1995014AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomest...

59

WA_1994_034_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_INC_Waiver_of_Domesti...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4034AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1994034AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1994034AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDom...

60

WA_99_017_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9017AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA99017AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA99017AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofDomesti...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

WA_04_028_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_patent_Rights...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofpatentRights.pdf WA04028AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofpatentRights.pdf WA04028AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofpatentRigh...

62

WA_1993_028_ALLIANCE_ELECTRIC_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3028ALLIANCEELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1993028ALLIANCEELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1993028ALLIANCEELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofDomestic...

63

WA_98_006_WESTINGHOUSE_POWER_GENERATION_A_FORMER_DIVISION_OF...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISIONOF.pdf WA98006WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISIONOF.pdf WA98006WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISION...

64

WA_98_005_WESTINGHOUSE_POWER_GENERATION_A_FORMER_DIVISION_OF...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISIONOF.pdf WA98005WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISIONOF.pdf WA98005WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISION...

65

WA-TRIBE-STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WA-TRIBE-STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS WA-TRIBE-STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Location: Tribe WA-TRIBE- STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS WA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description The Stillaguamish Tribe proposes to expand its Stillaguamish Tribe Transit Services (STTS). For the past three years, the STTS has employed 14-passenger buses to transport clients to and from the tribal medical, dental, behavioral health and massage clinics. Often the demand-response requests that come to STTS are for one to three passengers at a time; therefore, funds are being requested to purchase a hybrid sedan to transport clients. Conditions: None Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: A1, B1.32, B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21

66

Spring Chinook Salmon Interactions Indices and Residual/Precocial Monitoring in the Upper Yakima Basin; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2001-2002 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report examines some of the factors that can influence the success of supplementation, which is currently being tested in the Yakima Basin using upper Yakima stock of spring chinook salmon. Supplementation success in the Yakima Basin is defined relative to four topic areas: natural production, genetics, ecological interactions, and harvest (Busack et al. 1997). The success of spring chinook salmon supplementation in the Yakima Basin is dependent, in part, upon fish culture practices and favorable physical and biological conditions in the natural environment (Busack et al. 1997). Shortfalls in either of these two topics (i.e., failure in culturing many fish that have high long-term fitness or environmental conditions that constrain spring chinook salmon production) will cause supplementation success to be limited. For example, inadvertent selection or propagation of spring chinook that residualize or precocially mature may hinder supplementation success. Spring chinook salmon that residualize (do not migrate during the normal migration period) may have lower survival rates than migrants and, additionally, may interact with wild fish and cause unacceptable impacts to non-target taxa. Large numbers of precocials (nonanadromous spawners) may increase competition for females and significantly skew ratios of offspring sired by nonanadromous males, which could result in more nonanadromous spring chinook in future generations. Conditions in the natural environment may also limit the success of spring chinook supplementation. For example, intra or interspecific competition may constrain spring chinook salmon production. Spring chinook salmon juveniles may compete with each other for food or space or compete with other species that have similar ecological requirements. Monitoring of spring chinook salmon residuals, precocials, prey abundance, carrying capacity, and competition will help researchers interpret why supplementation is working or not working (Busack et al. 1997). Monitoring ecological interactions will be accomplished using interactions indices. Interactions indices will be used to index the availability of prey and competition for food and space. The tasks described below represent various subject areas of juvenile spring chinook salmon monitoring but are treated together because they can be accomplished using similar methods and are therefore more cost efficient than if treated separately. Three areas of investigation we pursued in this work were: (1) strong interactor monitoring (competition index and prey index), (2) carrying capacity monitoring (microhabitat monitoring); (3) residual and precocial salmon monitoring (abundance). This report is organized into three chapters to represent these three areas of investigation. Data were collected during the summer and fall, 2002 in index sections of the upper Yakima Basin (Figure 1). Hatchery reared spring chinook salmon were first released during the spring of 1999. The monitoring plan for the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project calls for the continued monitoring of the variables covered in this report. All findings in this report should be considered preliminary and subject to further revision as more data and analytical results become available.

Pearsons, Todd N.; James, Brenda B.; Johnson, Christopher L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Yakima River Basin Fish Passage Phase II Fish Screen Construction, Project Completion Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On December 5, 1980, Congress passed the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Public Law 96-501). The Act created the Northwest Power Planning Council (now the Northwest Power and Conservation Council). The Council was charged with the responsibility to prepare a Regional Conservation and Electric Power Plan and to develop a program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife including related spawning grounds and habitat on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The Council adopted its Fish and Wildlife Program on November 15, 1982. Section 800 of the Program addresses measures in the Yakima River Basin. The Yakima measures were intended to help mitigate hydroelectric impacts in the basin and provide off-site mitigation to compensate for fish losses caused by hydroelectric project development and operations throughout the Columbia River Basin. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) was designated as a major source of funding for such off-site mitigation measures and was requested to initiate discussions with the appropriate Federal project operators and the Council to determine the most expeditious means for funding and implementing the program. The primary measures proposed for rapid implementation in the Yakima River basin were the installation of fish passage and protective facilities. Sec. 109 of The Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984, authorized the Secretary of the Interior to design, construct, operate, and maintain fish passage facilities within the Yakima River Basin. Under Phase I of the program, improvements to existing fish passage facilities and installation of new fish ladders and fish screens at 16 of the largest existing diversion dams and canals were begun in 1984 and were completed in 1990. The Yakima Phase II fish passage program is an extension of the Phase I program. In 1988, the Yakama Nation (YN) submitted an application to amend Sections 803(b) and 1403(4.5) of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program to begin preliminary design on the Phase II fish screen program. Based on citizen and agency endorsement, the Council approved the amendment in 1989. The Council authorized BPA to provide funding for Phase II screens through the Fish and Wildlife Program. BPA then asked the Bureau of Reclamation to provide engineering and design expertise to the Phase II projects.

Hudson, R. Dennis

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

The Reaches Project : Ecological and Geomorphic Dtudies Supporting Normative Flows in the Yakima River Basin, Washington, Final Report 2002.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Yakima River system historically produced robust annual runs of chinook, sockeye, chum and coho salmon and steelhead. Many different stocks or life history types existed because the physiography of the basin is diverse, ranging from very dry and hot in the high desert of the lower basin to cold and wet in the Cascade Mountains of the headwaters (Snyder and Stanford 2001). Habitat diversity and life history diversity of salmonids are closely correlated in the Yakima Basin. Moreover, habitat diversity for salmonids and many other fishes maximizes in floodplain reaches of river systems (Ward and Stanford 1995, Independent Scientific Group 2000). The flood plains of Yakima River likely were extremely important for spawning and rearing of anadromous salmonids (Snyder and Stanford 2001). However, Yakima River flood plains are substantially degraded. Primary problems are: revetments that disconnect main and side channel habitats; dewatering associated with irrigation that changes base flow conditions and degrades the shallow-water food web; chemical and thermal pollution that prevents proper maturation of eggs and juveniles; and extensive gravel mining within the floodplain reaches that has severed groundwater-channel connectivity, increased thermal loading and increased opportunities for invasions of nonnative species. The Yakima River is too altered from its natural state to allow anything close to the historical abundance and diversity of anadromous fishes. Habitat loss, overharvest and dam and reservoir passage problems in the mainstem Columbia River downstream of the Yakima, coupled with ocean productivity variation, also are implicated in the loss of Yakima fisheries. Nonetheless, in an earlier analysis, Snyder and Stanford (2001) concluded that a significant amount of physical habitat remains in the five floodplain reaches of the mainstem river because habitat-structuring floods do still occur on the remaining expanses of floodplain environment. Assuming main stem and ocean bottlenecks are not overriding, restoration of floodplain connectivity by elevating base flows throughout the corridor, removing revetments and refilling gravel pits by natural riverine transport of gravel where possible could be successful in substantially enhancing Yakima salmon and steelhead runs. Hence, the overarching purpose of this research was to determine the ecology of major floodplain reaches of the Yakima River: Cle Elum, Kittitas, Naches, Union Gap and Wapato. Specifically, the study documented groundwater-channel connectivity and flow relations; use and quality of side channel and other floodplain habitats by salmonid fishes; and classification and analysis of floodplain habitat using remote sensing and documentation of geomorphic processes, required for a robust understanding of the feasibility of revetment removal and establishment of a normative flow regime for the mainstem river.

Stanford, Jack A.; Lorang, Mark N.; Matson, Phillip L. (University of Montana, Flathead Lake Biological Station, Poison, MT)

2002-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Phase II Fish Screen Operation and Maintenance; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2005-2006 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The goal of this project is to assure that the benefits of BPA's capital investment in Yakima Basin Phase II fish screen facilities are realized by performing operations that assure optimal fish protection and long facility life through a rigorous preventative maintenance program, while helping to restore ESA listed fish stocks in the Yakima River Basin.

Schille, Patrick C. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Habitat Program, Yakima, WA)

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

The area of North King County was once forested with deep woods and braided with creeks, where wild-  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The area of North King County was once forested with deep woods and braided with creeks, where wild distinct identities, of the historic communities of North King County. www.ci.woodinville.wa.us www and a jumping-off point for the Burke-Gilman trail. Tracy Owen was a King county council mem- ber from 1969

Yetisgen-Yildiz, Meliha

71

WA_98_016_ABB_POWER_T_AND_D_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_F...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-046 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-016 WA96016AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofDomestic...

72

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-030 | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

public. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-030 More Documents & Publications WA97030AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofDomesticandForeignPaten.pdf WA98001REYNOLDSMETALSCOMPANYW...

73

WA_04_085_THE_BOEING_COMPANY_Waiver_of_domestic_and_Foreign_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-018 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2007-012 WA99017AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofDomesticand...

74

WA_00_025_PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_Request.pdf | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25PRAXAIRINCWaiverRequest.pdf WA00025PRAXAIRINCWaiverRequest.pdf WA00025PRAXAIRINCWaiverRequest.pdf More Documents & Publications WA00001PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDo...

75

WA_00_035_ALCOA_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Rights_in...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

& Publications WA03054HEILTRAILERINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA00011HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-051...

76

WA_03_054_HEIL_TRAILER_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

& Publications WA00035ALCOAINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignRightsin.pdf WA00011HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-051...

77

Reproductive Ecology of Yakima River Hatchery and Wild Spring Chinook and Juvenile-to-Adult PIT-tag Retention; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is intended to satisfy two concurrent needs: (1) provide a contract deliverable from Oncorh Consulting to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), with emphasis on identification of salient results of value to ongoing Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) planning, and (2) summarize results of research that have broader scientific relevance. This is the first in an anticipated series of reports that address reproductive ecological research and monitoring of spring chinook in the Yakima River basin. In addition to within-year comparisons, between-year comparisons will be made to determine if traits of the wild Naches basin control population, the naturally spawning population in the upper Yakima River and the hatchery control population are diverging over time. This annual report summarizes data collected between April 1, 2001 and March 31, 2002. In the future, these data will be compared to previous years to identify general trends and make preliminary comparisons.

Knudsen, Curtis M. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2002-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

RAPID/Roadmap/4-WA-a | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4-WA-a State Exploration Process 4-WA-a State Exploration Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Permit Overview Developers desiring to conduct geothermal exploration activities on...

79

RAPID/Roadmap/3-WA-b | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

needs access to state lands for exploratory purposes, then they should begin the State Exploration Process. Green arrow.PNG 4-WA-a: State Exploration Process 3-WA-b.3 to...

80

RAPID/Roadmap/19-WA-f | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9-WA-f Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Permit Overview A developer...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

RECIPIENT:WA Dept. of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT SEP ARRA SIRTI -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WA Dept. of Commerce STATE: WA WA Dept. of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT SEP ARRA SIRTI - Demand Energy - Energy Storage System Tied to Solar on Commercial Facility TITLE: Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm Number DE-FOA-0000052 DE-EEOOO0139 GFO-o000139-031 Based on my review ofthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and demand studies), and dissemination (including, but not limited to, document mailings, publication, and distribution;

82

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-011 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

W(A)2011-011 More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-011 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-045 WA07038POETPROJECTLIBERTYLLCWaiverofDomesticandFo...

83

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

W(A)2005-006 More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-022 WA04079PRAXAIRINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcon.pdf Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-063...

84

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2002-023 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-023 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2002-023 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2002-023 More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-028 WA05056IBMWATSONRESEARCHCENTERWa...

85

WA_-01_001_PHILLIPS_PETROLEUM_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-01001PHILLIPSPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA-01001PHILLIPSPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA-01001PHILLIPSPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticand...

86

WA_07_038_POET_PROJECT_LIBERTY_LLC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fo...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7038POETPROJECTLIBERTYLLCWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA07038POETPROJECTLIBERTYLLCWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA07038POETPROJECTLIBERTYLLCWaiverofDomestic...

87

WA_1993_041_ROCKETDYNE_AND_LLNL_Waiver_of_the_Governments_U.pdf...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1ROCKETDYNEANDLLNLWaiveroftheGovernmentsU.pdf WA1993041ROCKETDYNEANDLLNLWaiveroftheGovernmentsU.pdf WA1993041ROCKETDYNEANDLLNLWaiveroftheGovernmentsU.pd...

88

WA_1993_042_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_the_Go...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TIONWaiveroftheGo.pdf More Documents & Publications WA1993040REGENTSOFTHEUNIVERSITYOFCALIFORNIAWaivero.pdf WA1993041ROCKETDYNEANDLLNLWaiveroftheGovernmentsU...

89

WA_99_015_FORD_MOTOR_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf More Documents & Publications WA97038FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA98008GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaive...

90

WA_99_022_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_F...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9022AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA99022AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA99022AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALWaiverofDomestic...

91

WA_02_015_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Ri...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

15AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofPatentRi.pdf WA02015AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofPatentRi.pdf WA02015AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofPatent...

92

WA_04_063_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

63AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04063AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04063AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRig...

93

WA_04_083_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

83AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04083AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04083AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRig...

94

WA_01_005__PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_patent...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1005PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignpatent.pdf WA01005PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignpatent.pdf WA01005PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeign...

95

WA_01_022_PRAXAIR_INC_AND_BP_AMOCO_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fo...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1022PRAXAIRINCANDBPAMOCOWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA01022PRAXAIRINCANDBPAMOCOWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA01022PRAXAIRINCANDBPAMOCOWaiverofDomestic...

96

WA_03_018_HONEYWELL_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_For...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3018HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA03018HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA03018HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomestica...

97

WA_02_028_TRANE_CO__Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Rights_in...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5YORKINTERNATIONALCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesti.pdf WA01034INGERSOLL-RANDENERGYSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestica.pdf WA01011HONEYWELLLABORATORIESWaiverofDomesticandFore...

98

WA_04_040_HONEYWELL_INTERNATIONAL_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Right...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

40HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALINCWaiverofPatentRight.pdf WA04040HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALINCWaiverofPatentRight.pdf WA04040HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALINCWaiverofPatentRi...

99

WA_03_041_HONEYWELL_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_For...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3041HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA03041HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA03041HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomestica...

100

WA_01_011_HONEYWELL_LABORATORIES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11HONEYWELLLABORATORIESWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA01011HONEYWELLLABORATORIESWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA01011HONEYWELLLABORATORIESWaiverofDomesticandF...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

WA_00_011_HONEYWELL_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_For...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0011HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA00011HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA00011HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomestica...

102

WA_00_010_ROCKWELL_SCIENCE_CENTER_A_Subcontractor_of_SILICON...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NTERASubcontractorofSILICON.pdf More Documents & Publications WA03011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA01034INGERSOLL-RANDENERGYSYSTEMSWaiverof...

103

WA_04_034_NUVERA_FUEL_CELLS_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Forei...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

34NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04034NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04034NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandFo...

104

WA_04_041_NUVERA_FUEL_CELLS_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Forei...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04041NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04041NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandFo...

105

BayWa Group | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

BayWa Group BayWa Group Jump to: navigation, search Name BayWa Group Place Munich, Germany Zip 81925 Sector Services, Solar Product Germany-based company with international operations specialised in wholesale and retail and in providing services. The company is also active in the biofuel and solar sectors. Coordinates 48.136415°, 11.577531° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":48.136415,"lon":11.577531,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

106

BayWa Sunways JV | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sunways JV Jump to: navigation, search Name: BayWa & Sunways JV Place: Germany Sector: Solar Product: Germany-based JV that specialises in developing, planning and realizing...

107

RAPID/Roadmap/14-WA-b | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

RAPID Regulatory and Permitting Information Desktop Toolkit BETA RAPID Toolkit About Bulk Transmission Geothermal Solar Tools Contribute Contact Us 14-WA-b NPDES Permit...

108

RAPID/Roadmap/9-WA-a | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

(EIS) is necessary. Contact Information Agency Washington State Department of Ecology Position State Environmental Issues Contact Name Fran Sant Email fran.sant@ecy.wa.gov...

109

Fourth Annual SECA Meeting - Seattle, WA  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fourth Annual SECA Meeting - Seattle, WA Fourth Annual SECA Meeting - Seattle, WA April 15-16, 2003 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Expanded Applications of SECA Fuel Cells SECA Industrial Team Reports Military Applications of Fuel Cells Technology Highlights Environmental Considerations Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

110

waTer economics. environmenTand Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

41 cenTre for waTer economics. environmenTand Policy "Men and nature must work hand in hand and public policy insights for the supply, demand, management, and governance of water CWEEP pronounced `sweep' as in to survey so as to obtain a whole and continuous view of the world #12;42 waTer is a cri

Botea, Adi

111

Microsoft Word - PI_NEPA-CX_KittitasCountyCEAcquisition.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2010 2, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Sandra Fife Project Manager - KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) would provide funds to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for the purchase of a conservation easement on 432.3 acres of the Hundley property for fish habitat mitigation in Kittitas County, Washington. BPA would hold a conservation easement on the property and the easement would be protected and co-managed by WDFW, the Yakama Nation's Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) and the Kittitas Conservation Trust (KCT). Budget Information: Work Order #00191727 Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 1997-051-00, BPA-004607 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021):

112

RECIPIENT:WA Department of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT Van Dyk Dairy Anaerobic Digester  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of5 of5 RECIPIENT:WA Department of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT Van Dyk Dairy Anaerobic Digester TITLE: Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm Number DE-EE0000139 GF0-10-604 Based on my review oftbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA CompUance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the foUowing determination: cx, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and demand studies), and dissemination (including, but not limited to, document mailings, publication, and distribution;

113

Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility | National Nuclear Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility January 16, 1943 Hanford, WA

114

W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

W.A. W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary February 2013 DOE/EIS-0473 Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COVER SHEET Responsible Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Title: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473) Location: Southeastern Texas, including Fort Bend, Wharton, and Jackson counties Contacts: For further information about this Environmental Impact Statement, contact: For general information on the DOE process for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, contact: Mark W. Lusk U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory 3610 Collins Ferry Road Morgantown, WV 26507-0880 (304) 285-4145 or Mark.Lusk@netl.doe.gov

115

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-035 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

public. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-035 More Documents & Publications WA07038POETPROJECTLIBERTYLLCWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-022...

116

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-042 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waiver W(A)2010-042 More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-023 WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf ClassWaiverWC-2003-001.pdf...

117

EIS-0505: Vantage to Pomona Heights 230 kV Transmission Line Project, Yakima, Grant, Benton and Kittitas Counties, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Bureau of Land Management is preparing, with DOEs Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) as a cooperating agency, an EIS that evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct a 60- to 67-mile long 230-kV transmission line. BPAs proposed action is to interconnect the transmission line to an existing BPA substation. Additional information is available at http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/spokane/plans/vph230/.

118

Perry County  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

those who took jobs at the landfill as a means of survival.recently hired at the landfill, Perry County Commissionerash to the local Arrowhead Landfill. The coal ash comes from

Durning, Matt; Eaton, N'Jeri

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

WA_00_008_PLUG_POWER_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_in_Performance_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POWERWaiverofPatentRightsinPerformance.pdf More Documents & Publications WA99012AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderANNVO.pdf WA99022AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICAL...

120

WA_99_012_AIR_PRODUCTS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_AN_NVO_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderANNVO.pdf WA99012AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderANNVO.pdf WA99012AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderANNV...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

WA_1994_027_FORD_MOTOR_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreig...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA97038FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA99012AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderANNVO...

122

WA_00_018_PRAXAIR_Waive_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Invention_Ri...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18PRAXAIRWaiveofDomesticandForeignInventionRi.pdf WA00018PRAXAIRWaiveofDomesticandForeignInventionRi.pdf WA00018PRAXAIRWaiveofDomesticandForeignInvention...

123

WA_02_046_QUESTA_AIR_TECHNOLOGIES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_For...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

IRTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf More Documents & Publications WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA02021H2GENINNOVATIONSWaiverof...

124

WA_03_024_PRAXAIR_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Invention_R...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignInventionR.pdf WA03024PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignInventionR.pdf WA03024PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignInventio...

125

WA_01_039_PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Patent_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1039PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatent.pdf WA01039PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatent.pdf WA01039PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignP...

126

WA_02_055_PRAXAIR_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Patent_Righ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPaten...

127

WA_00_001_PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Inventi...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignInventi.pdf WA00001PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignInventi.pdf WA00001PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignInve...

128

WA_04_079_PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_Subcon...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04079PRAXAIRINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcon.pdf WA04079PRAXAIRINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcon.pdf WA04079PRAXAIRINCWaiverofPatentRightsUndera...

129

WA_02_022_HONEYWELL_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Inven...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22HONEYWELLINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignInven.pdf WA02022HONEYWELLINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignInven.pdf WA02022HONEYWELLINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignIn...

130

WA_02_045_KENNAMETAL_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Righ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignRigh.pdf More Documents & Publications WA00011HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA01034INGERSOLL-RANDENERGYSYSTEMS...

131

WA_04_039_HONEYWELL_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Un...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA04039HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA04039HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRights...

132

WA_04_007_OSHKOSH_TRUCK_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_N...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WaiverofPatentRightsUnderN.pdf More Documents & Publications WA03011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA04008GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofPatentRi...

133

WA_03_011_ROCKWELL_AUTOMATION_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRights...

134

Cook County- LEED Requirements for County Buildings  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In 2002, Cook County enacted an ordinance requiring all new county buildings and all retrofitted county buildings to be built to LEED standards. Specifically, all newly constructed buildings and...

135

Microsoft Word - CX-AccessRoads-KingCoWA-FY13_WEB.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2013 22, 2013 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-Covington SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Rick Ross Engineer - TELF-TPP-3 Proposed Action: Covington District Culvert Replacements Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): Appendix B1.3, Routine Maintenance Location: King County, WA Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to replace existing culverts at 12 access road stream crossings that present barriers to fish passage. These improvements will be made on BPA easement access roads within DNR owned and managed lands. BPA will make these improvements by installing new fish friendly culverts and/or bridges at each stream crossing. The current stream crossings do not meet DNR fish passage standards that will be in

136

Isotopic Studies of Contaminant Transport at the Hanford Site, WA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MR-0132. Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland WA. Bretz,in recharge at the Hanford Site. Northwest Science. 66:237-M.J. , ed. 2000. Hanford Site groundwater Monitoring

Christensen, J.N.; Conrad, M.E.; DePaolo, D.J.; Dresel, P.E.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

RAPID/Roadmap/18-WA-b | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

period in which the WSDE has to respond to the Demonstration of Compliance. 18-WA-b.17 - Conduct Public Meeting, if Requested If the public requests a public meeting on the...

138

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 2003 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2003, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 23 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS]) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2003, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by the NOAA Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve juvenile fish passage conditions. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well greased and operative. (5) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites.

Vucelick, J.; McMichael, G.; Chamness, M. (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Spring Chinook Salmon Interactions Indices and Residual/Precocious Male Monitoring in the Upper Yakima Basin; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report examines some of the factors that can influence the success of supplementation, which is currently being tested in the Yakima Basin using upper Yakima stock of spring chinook salmon. Supplementation success in the Yakima Basin is defined relative to four topic areas: natural production, genetics, ecological interactions, and harvest (Busack et al. 1997). The success of spring chinook salmon supplementation in the Yakima Basin is dependent, in part, upon fish culture practices and favorable physical and biological conditions in the natural environment (Busack et al. 1997; James et al. 1999; Pearsons et al., 2003; Pearsons et al. 2004). Shortfalls in either of these two topics (i.e., failure in culturing many fish that have high long-term fitness or environmental conditions that constrain spring chinook salmon production) will cause supplementation success to be limited. For example, inadvertent selection or propagation of spring chinook that residualize or precocially mature may hinder supplementation success. Spring chinook salmon that residualize (do not migrate during the normal migration period) may have lower survival rates than migrants and, additionally, may interact with wild fish and cause unacceptable impacts to non-target taxa. Large numbers of precocials (nonanadromous spawners) may increase competition for females and significantly skew ratios of offspring sired by nonanadromous males, which could result in more nonanadromous spring chinook in future generations. Conditions in the natural environment may also limit the success of spring chinook supplementation. For example, intra or interspecific competition may constrain spring chinook salmon production. Spring chinook salmon juveniles may compete with each other for food or space or compete with other species that have similar ecological requirements. Monitoring of spring chinook salmon residuals, precocials, prey abundance, carrying capacity, and competition will help researchers interpret why supplementation is working or not working (Busack et al. 1997). Monitoring ecological interactions will be accomplished using interactions indices. Interactions indices will be used to index the availability of prey and competition for food and space. The tasks described below represent various subject areas of juvenile spring chinook salmon monitoring but are treated together because they can be accomplished using similar methods and are therefore more cost efficient than if treated separately. Topics of investigation we pursued in this work were: (1) strong interactor monitoring (competition index and prey index), (2) carrying capacity monitoring (microhabitat monitoring); (3) residual and precocious male salmon monitoring (abundance); (4) performance of growth modulation in reducing precocious males during spawning; (5) incidence of predation by residualized chinook salmon; and (6) benefits of salmon carcasses to juvenile salmonids. This report is organized into six chapters to represent these topics of investigation. Data were collected during the summer and fall, 2004 in index sections of the upper Yakima Basin (Figure 1). Previous results on the topics in this report were reported in James et al. (1999), and Pearsons et al. (2003; 2004). Hatchery-reared spring chinook salmon were first released during the spring of 1999. The monitoring plan for the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project calls for the continued monitoring of the variables covered in this report. All findings in this report should be considered preliminary and subject to further revision as more data and analytical results become available.

Pearsons, Todd N.; Johnson, Christopher L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA); James, Brenda B. (Cascade Aquatics, Ellensburg, WA)

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Potential social, institutional, and environmental impacts of selected energy-conservation measures in two Washington communities. [Seattle and Yakima  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The likely environmental, social, and institutional impacts of selected energy-conservation measures in two communities in Washington state are reported. The five conservation measures investigated in this study were: (1) retrofitting existing buildings; (2) district heating and Integrated Community Energy Systems (ICES); (3) small automobiles and vehicle redesign; (4) land-use and housing modifications; and (5) electric-utility rate reform. Twenty potential impact areas were selected for analysis. These areas were divided into five categories of environmental impacts, economic impacts, community impacts, personal impacts, and overall quality of life in the community. The research was conducted in Seattle and Yakima, Washington. In each location, about two dozen public officials and business, labor, and community leaders were interviewed. Their diverse views are summarized. The Seattle respondents saw energy conservation as a highly desirable policy with a number of temporary, transitional problems arising as energy-conservation measures were implemented. Yakima respondents, in contrast, did not expect to encounter many serious energy problems in the foreseeable future and consequently viewed energy conservation as a relatively minor community concern. Moreover, they anticipated that many conservation measures, if implemented by the government, would encounter either apathy or resistance in their community. Two broad generalizations can bedrawn from these interviews: (1) energy conservation will basically be beneficial for the natural environment and our society; and (2) if energy conservation does become a dominant thrust in our society, it could stimulate and reinforce a much broader process of fundamental social change. (LCL)

Edelson, E.; Olsen, M.

1980-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Effects of Domestication on Predation Mortality and Competitive Dominance; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is intended to satisfy two concurrent needs: (1) provide a contract deliverable from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) to the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), with emphasis on identification of salient results of value to ongoing Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) planning, and (2) summarize results of research that have broader scientific relevance. This is the second of a series of progress reports that address the effects of hatchery domestication on predation mortality and competitive dominance in the upper Yakima River basin (Pearsons et al. 2004). This progress report summarizes data collected between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004. Raising fish in hatcheries can cause unintended behavioral, physiological, or morphological changes in chinook salmon due to domestication selection. Domestication selection is defined by Busack and Currens 1995 as, ''changes in quantity, variety, or combination of alleles within a captive population or between a captive population and its source population in the wild as a result of selection in an artificial environment''. Selection in artificial environments could be due to intentional or artificial selection, biased sampling during some stage of culture, or unintentional selection (Busack and Currens 1995). Genetic changes can result in lowered survival in the natural environment (Reisenbichler and Rubin 1999). The goal of supplementation or conservation hatcheries is to produce fish that will integrate into natural populations. Conservation hatcheries attempt to minimize intentional or biased sampling so that the hatchery fish are similar to naturally produced fish. However, the selective pressures in hatcheries are dramatically different than in the wild, which can result in genetic differences between hatchery and wild fish. The selective pressures may be particularly prominent during the freshwater rearing stage where most mortality of wild fish occurs. The Yakima Fisheries Project is studying the effects of domestication on a variety of adult and juvenile traits of spring chinook salmon (Busack et al. 2003). The overall experimental design is to compare a variety of traits, across generations, from three lines of Yakima basin chinook, a hatchery control, supplementation line, and a wild control. The hatchery line was derived from wild upper Yakima broodstock and is only allowed to spawn in the hatchery. The supplementation line is upper Yakima stock that spawns in the upper Yakima River. This stock is an integration of wild and hatchery supplementation fish. Starting in 2005, we plan to use a wild control line of fish that will be the offspring of wild broodstock collected in the Naches River system, a tributary to the Yakima River. The Naches River is not stocked with hatchery fish, and there is minimal stray from Upper Yakima supplementation, so we believe that these will serve as a control to compare any genotypic changes in the hatchery and the supplementation line. As generations of fish are tested, we believe we will be able to analyze the data using an analysis of covariance to test the hypothesis that the hatchery line will exhibit greater domestication over generations, the wild line will remain at baseline levels, and the supplementation line will be somewhere in between. In this report, we have used the terms ''hatchery'' or ''supplementation'' to refer to upper Yakima fish that are progeny of fish that spent one generation in the hatchery, and ''wild'' to refer to fish that have had no exposure to the hatchery other than the matings for this experiment. The terms are relative to the parents that produced the fish for these experiments. All progeny of these fish were mated and reared under the same laboratory conditions. This report addresses two juvenile traits: predation mortality, and competitive dominance. Other traits will be presented in other project reports. It is anticipated that it will take at least two to five generations to detect measurable responses in many domestication response variables (Busack et

Pearsons, Todd N.; Fritts, Anthony L.; Scott, Jennifer L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

Microsoft Word - SA-06-EIS-0169-Holmes Coho site.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DATE: March 12, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-06) David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Under the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (M&E), the coho acclimation research task would be modified to include a new site located in the Upper Yakima north of Ellensburg, WA. Project No.: F3204 Location: Ellensburg, Kittitas County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Yakima Fisheries Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (YFP EIS) (USDOE/BPA 1996) analyzed impacts of undertaking fishery research and mitigation

143

Campbell County Wind Farm  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

environmental assessment (EA) on the proposed interconnection of the Campbell County Wind Farm (Project) in Campbell County, near the city of Pollock, South Dakota. Dakota...

144

Gaseous Detonation-Driven Fracture of Tubes Tong Wa Chao  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Gaseous Detonation-Driven Fracture of Tubes Thesis by Tong Wa Chao In Partial Fulfillment An experimental investigation of fracture response of aluminum 6061-T6 tubes under internal gaseous detonation on the detonation velocity, strain history, blast pressure from the crack opening, and crack speeds. The curved

145

EIS-0169-SA-08: Supplement Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington

146

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Washington - WA 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington - WA 0-01 Washington - WA 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON (WA.0-01) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Seattle , Washington WA.0-01-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 WA.0-01-1 Site Operations: Research activities involving small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment. WA.0-01-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for residual radioactive contamination considered remote - Operating under active NRC license WA.0-01-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated WA.0-01-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see

147

RAPID/Roadmap/11-WA-b | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) handles the disposition of non-forensic remains, while the county coroner handles the disposition of forensic remains....

148

Rutland County Data Dashboard  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The data dashboard for Rutland County, Vermont, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

149

A summary of 22 Years of Fish Screen Evaluation in the Yakima River Basin, Summary Report 1985-2007.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sixty fish screen facilities were constructed in the Yakima River basin between 1985 and 2006 as part of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council plan to mitigate the effects of federal hydroelectric projects on fish and wildlife populations. This report summarizes evaluations of some of those and other fish screen facilities conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) from 1985 through 2006. The objective of these studies was to determine if the newly designed and constructed fish screens were effective at providing juvenile salmonids safe passage past irrigation diversions. To answer that question, PNNL conducted release-and-catch studies at eight Phase I sites in the Yakima River basin. Increasing concerns about the impacts of hatchery fish releases on the wild fish population, as well as the cost and time necessary to perform these kinds of biological studies at more than 60 planned Phase II sites, required development of techniques to evaluate the effectiveness of the sites without releasing fish. The new techniques involved collecting information on screen design, operation, and effectiveness at guiding fish safely through the fish screen facility. Performance measures including water velocities and passage conditions provide a good alternative to biological studies at significantly lower cost and time. Physical techniques were used at all 10 Phase I and 28 Phase II sites evaluated by PNNL over the following 19 years. Results of these studies indicate the Phase I and II fish screen facilities are designed and capable of providing safe passage for juvenile salmonids so long as construction, maintenance, and operations meet the criteria used in the design of each site and the National Marine Fisheries Service criteria for juvenile fish screen design.

Chamness, Mickie A. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

2007-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

150

File:INL-geothermal-wa.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

wa.pdf wa.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Washington Geothermal Resources Size of this preview: 699 × 600 pixels. Full resolution ‎(4,835 × 4,147 pixels, file size: 3.28 MB, MIME type: application/pdf) Description Washington Geothermal Resources Sources Idaho National Laboratory Authors Patrick Laney; Julie Brizzee Related Technologies Geothermal Creation Date 2003-11-01 Extent State Countries United States UN Region Northern America States Washington File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 12:45, 16 December 2010 Thumbnail for version as of 12:45, 16 December 2010 4,835 × 4,147 (3.28 MB) MapBot (Talk | contribs) Automated upload from NREL's "mapsearch" data

151

GRR/Section 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

5-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit 5-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies WAC 173-400-110 WAC 173-400-111 WAC 173-400-171 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process for obtaining an Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit. The Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) oversees the permitting process under WAC 173-400. 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf

152

San Diego County, California  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Location: San Diego County, CaliforniaSeed Funding: $3.9 milliona portion of Los Angeles County's $30 million fundingTarget Building Types: Residential (single-family and multifamily)Website:...

153

Sonoma County, California  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Location: Town of Windsor in Sonoma County, CaliforniaSeed Funding: $665,000a portion ofLos Angeles County's $30 million fundingTarget Building Types: Residential (single-family, multifamily...

154

Yakima and Touchet River Basins Phase II Fish Screen Evaluation, 2006-2007 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2006, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) researchers evaluated 27 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima and Touchet river basins. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory performs these evaluations for Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to determine whether the fish screening devices meet those National Marine Fisheries (NMFS) criteria for juvenile fish screen design, that promote safe and timely passage of juvenile salmonids. The NMFS criteria against which the sites were evaluated are as follows: (1) a uniform flow distribution over the screen surface to minimize approach velocity; (2) approach velocities less than or equal to 0.4 ft/s protects the smallest salmonids from impingement; (3) sweep velocities that are greater than approach velocities to minimize delay of out-migrating juveniles and minimize sediment deposition near the screens; (4) a bypass flow greater than or equal to the maximum flow velocity vector resultant upstream of the screens to also minimize delay of out-migrating salmonids; (5) a gradual and efficient acceleration of flow from the upstream end of the site into the bypass entrance to minimize delay of out-migrating salmonids; and (6) screen submergence between 65% and 85% for drum screen sites. In addition, the silt and debris accumulation next to the screens should be kept to a minimum to prevent excessive wear on screens, seals and cleaning mechanisms. Evaluations consist of measuring velocities in front of the screens, using an underwater camera to assess the condition and environment in front of the screens, and noting the general condition and operation of the sites. Results of the evaluations in 2006 include the following: (1) Most approach velocities met the NMFS criterion of less than or equal to 0.4 ft/s. Of the sites evaluated, 31% exceeded the criterion at least once. Thirty-three percent of flat-plate screens had problems compared to 25% of drum screens. (2) Woody debris and gravel deposited during high river levels were a problem at several sites. In some cases, it was difficult to determine the bypass pipe was plugged until several weeks had passed. Slow bypass flow caused by both the obstructions and high river levels may have discouraged fish from entering the bypass, but once they were in the bypass, they may have had no safe exit. Perhaps some tool or technique can be devised that would help identify whether slow bypass flow is caused by pipe blockage or by high river levels. (3) Bypass velocities generally were greater than sweep velocities, but sweep velocities often did not increase toward the bypass. The latter condition could slow migration of fish through the facility. (4) Screen and seal materials generally were in good condition. (5) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well-greased and operative. (6) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) generally operated and maintained fish screen facilities in a way that provided safe passage for juvenile fish. (7) Efforts with WDFW to find optimal louver settings at Naches-Selah were partly successful. The number of spots with excessive approach velocities was decreased, but we were unable to adjust the site to bring all approach values below 0.4 ft/s. (8) In some instances, irrigators responsible for specific maintenance at their sites (e.g., debris removal) did not perform their tasks in a way that provided optimum operation of the fish screen facility. Enforcement personnel proved effective at reminding irrigation districts of their responsibilities to maintain the sites for fish protection as well as irrigation. (9) We recommend placing datasheets providing up-to-date operating criteria and design flows in each site's logbox. The datasheet should include bypass design flows and a table showing depths of water over the weir and corresponding bypass flow. A similar datasheet relating canal gage readings and canal discharge in cubic feet per second would help identify times when the canal is taking mo

Chamness, Mickie; Tunnicliffe, Cherylyn [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Kent County- Wind Ordinance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This ordinance establishes provisions and standards for small wind energy systems in various zoning districts in Kent County, Maryland.

156

Boulder County Data Dashboard  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The data dashboard of Boulder County, a partner in the U.S. Department of Energy's Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

157

Kiowa County Commons Building  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This poster describes the energy efficiency features and sustainable materials used in the Kiowa County Commons Building in Greensburg, Kansas.

158

EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EA analyzes the potential environmental effects of a proposal by the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snowhomish County, Washington to construct and operate the Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project. The proposed 680-kilowatt project would be located on the east side of Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, Washington, about 1 kilometer west of Whidbey Island, entirely within Island County, Washington. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the lead agency. DOE is a cooperating agency.

159

GRR/Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review GRR/Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified Once the lead agency is determined they are responsible for continuing forward with environmental review. In Washington, environmental review is effectuated through the developer completing an Environmental Checklist which assists the lead agency in determining whether the proposal will likely result in negative impacts on the environment. 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review.pdf 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

160

DOE/EIS-0169-SA-02: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project --Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site Housing and Upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery (8/16/99)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 16, 1999 August 16, 1999 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEWI-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project, DOE/EIS-0169-SA-02 David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWN-4 Proposed Action: Yakima Fisheries Project - Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site Housing, and Upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery PL-6: F3204 Location: Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility, Cle Elum, Washington (CESRF) and Prosser Juvenile Research Facility, Prosser, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of several salmonid species in the Yakima and Klickitat river basins. BPA analyzed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Wind Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Los Angeles County In January 2007, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted rules to require that all new county buildings greater than 10,000 square feet be LEED Silver certified. All buildings authorized and fully funded on or

162

Category:Counties | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Counties Counties Jump to: navigation, search This category contains all counties in the United States of America. Contents: Top - 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Pages in category "Counties" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 3,142 total. (previous 200) (next 200) A Abbeville County, South Carolina Acadia Parish, Louisiana Accomack County, Virginia Ada County, Idaho Adair County, Iowa Adair County, Kentucky Adair County, Missouri Adair County, Oklahoma Adams County, Colorado Adams County, Idaho Adams County, Illinois Adams County, Indiana Adams County, Iowa Adams County, Mississippi Adams County, Nebraska Adams County, North Dakota Adams County, Ohio Adams County, Pennsylvania Adams County, Washington Adams County, Wisconsin

163

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Policy/Technical Involvement and Planning, 2001-2002 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) is a supplementation project sponsored by the Northwest Power Planning Council (Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program 1994, Measure 7.4K). The objectives of the YKFP are: (1) to test the hypothesis that new supplementation techniques can be used in the Yakima River Basin to increase natural production and to improve harvest opportunities while maintaining the long-term genetic fitness of the wild and native salmonid populations and keeping adverse ecological interactions within acceptable limits (Yakima Fisheries Project Final Environment Impact Statement, 1996); (2) provide knowledge about the use of supplementation, so that it may be used to mitigate effects on anadromous fisheries throughout the Columbia River Basin; (3) to maintain and improve the quantity and productivity of salmon and steelhead habitat, including those areas made accessible by habitat improvements; (4) to ensure that Project implementation remains consistent with the Council's Fish and Wildlife Program; and (5) to implement the Project in a prudent and environmentally sound manner. Current YKFP operations have been designed to test the principles of supplementation (Busack et al. 1997). The Project's experimental design has focused on the following critical uncertainties affecting supplementation: (1) The survival and reproductive success of hatchery fish after release from the hatchery; (2) The impacts of hatchery fish as they interact with non-target species and stocks; and, (3) The effects of supplementation on the long-term genetic fitness of fish stocks. The YKFP endorses an adaptive management policy applied through a project management framework as described in the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Planning Status Report (1995), Fast and Craig (1997), Clune and Dauble 1991. The project is managed by a Policy Group consisting of a representative of the Yakama Nation (YN, lead agency) and a representative of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The functions of the parties are described in an MOU between the YN and the WDFW. A Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) consisting of one representative from each management entity reports to the Policy Group and provides technical input on policy and other issues. Additional committee's, such as the Monitoring Implementation and Planning Team (MIPT), serve as the discretion of STAC. The Policy Group and STAC meet periodically (usually monthly) to conduct the business of the YKFP. Although the YKFP is an all stocks initiative (BPA 1996), most effort to date has been directed at spring chinook salmon and coho salmon. This report is a compilation of the year's activities between August 1, 2001 and July 31, 2002. All findings should be considered preliminary until data collection is completed or the information is published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Easterbrooks, John A.; Pearsons, Todd N. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

W(A)94-022 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-022 4-022 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Cummins Power Generation, Inc., for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Patent Rights to Inventions made under a contract entitled "Utility Scale Joint Venture Project," between Cummins Power Generation, Inc. and Sandia National Laboratories (Contract No. AB- 8717B) under Management and Operations Contract DE-AL04-84AL85000, DOE Docket No. W(A)94-022. The petitioner, Cummins Power Generation, Inc., (CPG) has requested a waiver of all domestic and foreign patent rights to inventions which it may conceive or first actually reduce to practice in the course of work under the Utility Scale Joint Venture Project between Petitioner and Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia) under contract No. AB- 8717B. Sandia is operated by Sandia Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

165

W(A)93-013 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13 13 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by AlliedSignal, Inc. for Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Patent Rights to inventions that may arise under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94462 between the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and AlliedSignal, Inc. DOE Docket: W(A)93-013 The Petitioner, AlliedSignal, Inc. (AlliedSignal), has requested a waiver of all domestic and foreign patent rights to inventions which it may conceive or reduce to practice in the course of work under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94462, a Cooperative Agreement with DOE. The project period is May 14, 1993 through May 13, 1996. The Cooperative Agreement covers work in designing a biological/chemical production process for caprolactam using microbial bioprocesses that convert cyclohexane to

166

W(A)93-039 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

39 39 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Patent Rights to inventions that may arise under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94461 between the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. DOE Docket: W(A)93-039. The Petitioner, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., (Air Products) has requested a waiver of all domestic and foreign patent rights to inventions which it may conceive or reduce to practice in the course of work under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94461 a Cooperative Agreement with DOE. The contract covers a four phase development program for a recently patented technology developed at Air Products entitled "Novel Selective Surface Flow (SSF T ) Membranes for the

167

GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Regulations & Policies WAC 232-12-064 Triggers None specified In Washington, it is unlawful to take wildlife from the wild without permission from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The WDFW issues Live Wildlife Taking Permits under WAC 232-12-064. 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

168

Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) June 12, 2013 DOE referred the matter of Fisher & Paykel Appliances residential clothes washer, model WA42T26GW1, to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, brand manager for the ENERGY STAR Program, for appropriate action after DOE testing showed that the model does not meet the ENERGY STAR specification. Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI DOE response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure for residential clothes washers Scoping Study to Evaluate Feasibility of National Databases for EM&V Documents and Measure Savings: Appendices

169

GRR/Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview GRR/Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Triggers None specified Any developer that needs access to or through state lands must obtain the appropriate permit or lease. The developer will obtain such permit or lease through the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative

170

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2004, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 25 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2004, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by NOAA Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well-greased and operative. (4) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites. (5) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve passage conditions for juvenile fish. For example, Taylor has had problems meeting bypass flow and submergence operating criteria since the main river channel shifted away from the site 2 years ago, and Fruitvale consistently has had problems meeting bypass flow criteria when the water is low. (6) Continued problems at Gleed point to design flaws. This site should be considered for redesign or replacement.

Vucelick, Jessica; McMichael, Geoffrey; Chamness, Mickie [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

San Diego County - Design Standards for County Facilities | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Design Standards for County Facilities Design Standards for County Facilities San Diego County - Design Standards for County Facilities < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Manufacturing Buying & Making Electricity Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Energy Sources Solar Wind Other Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider San Diego County The San Diego County Board of Supervisors established design standards for county facilities and property. Among other requirements, the policy requires that all new county buildings or major building renovations obtain U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED Building Certification.

172

Microbial community changes during sustained Cr(VI) reduction at the 100H site in Hanford, WA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

at the 100H site in Hanford, WA Romy Chakraborty 1 , Eoin Lcontaminated aquifer at the Hanford (WA) 100H site in 2004.Cr(VI) reduction at Hanford, and a comparison of the

Chakraborty, Romy

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Purchasing in Texas Counties.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for an office desk cost $10 or $11, whereas, a cover made from battleship linoleun~ secured from a local dealer and having almost identical appearance and service- ability, cost only $3.50 per desk. Anderson County In Palestine, the county auditor...

Hervey, E. J.; Bradshaw, H. C.

1944-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Texas Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Harris County In 2009, the Harris County Commissioners Court approved a measure that requires all new county buildings to meet minimum LEED certification standards. Buildings do not have to register with the the U.S. Green Building Council. The Harris County Facilities and Property Management (FPM) Division also requires all county buildings to meet minimum energy efficiency and sustainability measures, as described in the

175

Frederick County- Green Building Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Frederick County administers a green building program. It has two goals: (1) to ensure that County building projects implement strategies that enhance environmental performance and fiscal...

176

Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State New York Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Suffolk County In 2006, the Suffolk County Legislature enacted Resolution No. 126-2006, creating the Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED) Program for county construction projects. The program requirements were revised in 2008 (Resolution No. 551-2008), and again in 2011 (Resolution No. 458-2011). The program requires the County Department of Public Works to apply the LEED

177

Recipient: County of Washington, Oregon ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25 25 Recipient: County of Washington, Oregon ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Wa. Co. EE&C Project for County Facilities and Land Use and Transportation Development A9 B5.1 Waste stream Clause Historical Preservation Clause Engineering Clause (Installation of rooftop PV systems onto county government buildings) Energy Efficiency Retrofits B2.5 B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historical Preservation Clause (EE retrofits and lighting replacements) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Development Project - Transportation A9 All CX applies to administration, planning, siting and developing of a bike, trail and pedestrian system.

178

Fayette County, Pennsylvania Data Dashboard  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The data dashboard for Fayette County, Pennsylvania, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

179

Hillsborough County Cooperative Extension Service  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hillsborough County Cooperative Extension Service 5339 County Rd 579 Seffner, Fl., 33584-3334 813 of plants affected is called cycads. This family includes king and queen sagos, cardboard palms counties across Florida have begun to release parasitic wasps including Hillsborough County in 2002

Jawitz, James W.

180

Eagle County, Colorado Data Dashboard  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The data dashboard for Eagle County, Colorado, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Property:County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search Property Name County Property Type String Description County Name Pages using the property "County" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Akutan Geothermal Project + Aleutians East Borough, AK + Alligator Geothermal Geothermal Project + White Pine County, NV + Alum Geothermal Project + Esmerelda County, NV + Aurora Geothermal Project + Mineral County, NV + B Bald Mountain Geothermal Project + Lassen County, CA + Baltazor Springs Geothermal Project + Humboldt County, NV + Barren Hills Geothermal Project + Lyon, NV + Black Rock I Geothermal Project + Imperial County, OR + Black Rock II Geothermal Project + Imperial County, CA + Black Rock III Geothermal Project + Imperial County, CA +

182

Factors Associated with Hepatitis B Testing Among Vietnamese Americans  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Virginia, and Seattle/King County, WA. 17 This articleVietnamese Americans in King County, WA, three counties in

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Administrative Complaints on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MN Cincinnati, OH King County, WA Number Disposition 2FL Pinellas County, FL King County, WA Not available Not

Sears, Brad; Mallory, Christy; Hunter, Nan D.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Coyotes in Cook County  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Coyotes in Cook County Coyotes in Cook County Nature Bulletin No. 2 Forest Preserve District of Cook County -- July 31, 1969 George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Superintendent of Conversation COYOTES IN COOK COUNTY One winter night, a Forest Preserve Ranger heard the yapping howl of some animal that made his hair stand on end. A few days later, a farmer in the Sag valley saw what appeared to be a wolf lope across a road. Finally, the ranger, concealed within sight of a faint path apparently used by wild dogs or foxes, shot a coyote. The little bunch of black bristles at the base of its tail, covering a scent gland beneath the skin identified it as being of the wolf family. The animal was sent to the Illinois Natural History Survey, at Urbana, where it was pronounced to be a prairie wolf (also known as the "brush" wolf). In the west it is generally known by its Spanish name: coyote.

185

County\paa  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Eureka County Eureka County Yucca Mountain Information Office P.O. Box 257 Eureka, Nevada 89316 (702) 237-5372 FAX (702) 237-5708 January 29, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20585 RE: Price-Anderson Act To Whom It May Concern: In response the Federal Register notice of December 31, 1997 requesting public comments on the Price-Anderson Act (PAA), Eureka County, Nevada is submitting these comments. Eureka County is one of the affected units of local government under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 as amended. With potential socioeconomic, environmental and transportation impacts, we have a strong interest in oversight of the DOE's Yucca Mountain project activities, including transportation impacts and

186

Frederick County- Solar Ordinance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This ordinance permits solar arrays in any zoning district in Frederick County under the conditions that the total square footage of the array does not exceed that of the principle structure and...

187

Talbot County- Wind Ordinance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This ordinance amends the Talbot County Code, Chapter 190, Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development, to permit small wind turbine systems with wind turbine towers not to exceed 160 feet in total...

188

EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA 7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA Summary This EIS will evaluate the environmental impacts of a proposal to enter into a contract with a licensed natural gas supplier in Washington State to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas pipeline. The pipeline would deliver natural gas to support the Waste Treatment Plant and the 242-A Evaporator operations in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. For more information, contact: Mr. Douglas Chapin, NEPA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352 Documents Available for Download January 23, 2012 EIS-0467: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and

189

GRR/Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement GRR/Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified The primary purpose of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is to ensure that the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) policies are an integral part of the ongoing programs and actions of state and local government. An EIS must provide impartial discussion of significant environmental impacts and must inform decision makers and the public of reasonable alternatives, including mitigation measures that would avoid or minimize adverse impacts or enhance environmental quality. WAC 197-11-400.

190

GRR/Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells GRR/Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington 90.44.100 Revised Code of Washington 18.104.048 Washington Administrative Code 173-160-151 Triggers None specified A developer seeking to use ground water for an activity may need to drill a new well in a different location than a previous well, drill an additional well at an existing location, or drill a replacement well at the same

191

GRR/Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview GRR/Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified The developer will be required to comply with Washington state law when human remains or other cultural resources are discovered on a project site. Cultural resources include both historic and archaeological resources and sites. The discovery of cultural resources may require obtaining a permit and providing public notice and notice to Indian Tribes. Once the necessary procedures have been followed, the developer may continue with the project.

192

GRR/Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit GRR/Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Chapter 173-218 WAC Non-endangerment Standard Triggers None specified The Safe Drinking Water Act requires Washington to implement technical criteria and standards to protect underground sources of drinking water from contamination. Under Chapter 173-218 WAC, the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) regulates and permits underground injection control (UIC) wells in Washington. The Environmental Protection Agency

193

GRR/Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process GRR/Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.76 Washington Administrative Code Chapter 173-360 Triggers None specified Washington has a federally-approved state Underground Storage Tank (UST) program regulated by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) under Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.76 and Washington Administrative Code Chapter 173-360. Washington defines an "Underground

194

GRR/Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development GRR/Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development 5-WA-a.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies Geothermal Act 78.60 RCW Geothermal Rules 332-17 WAC Triggers None specified In Washington geothermal drilling and well development are regulated by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR). Geothermal production wells and core holes deeper than 750ft require the developer go through the whole WSDNR permitting process (which requires a public hearing) and require that the developer complete the State Environmental

195

GRR/Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process GRR/Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies RCW 79-36-350 RCW 79-36-520 RCW 79-36-530 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process for obtaining a right of way over state lands in Washington. The right of way process is overseen by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR). The right of way process is regulated under Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 79-36-350. The developer may apply for an easement, permit or license for a right of

196

GRR/Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification GRR/Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification 14-WA-d - 401 Water Quality Certification.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies U S Army Corps of Engineers Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Statute of Washington Chapter 90.48 Washington Administrative Code Chapter 173-201A Washington Administrative Code 173-225-030 Triggers None specified Developers requiring a Section 404 Dredge and Fill Permit from the U S Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) are required to obtain a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the state of Washington. The Washington State

197

GRR/Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well GRR/Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington 18.104.048 Washington Administrative Code 173-160-151 Triggers None specified A developer seeking to use ground water for an activity may need to drill a new well to access the ground water. When a developer needs to drill a new well, the developer must complete the Notice of Intent (NOI) to Drill a Well form and submit the form to the Washington State Department of Ecology

198

GRR/Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process GRR/Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology United States Environmental Protection Agency Regulations & Policies Clean Water Act Chapter 90.48 RCW Chapter 173-216 WAC Triggers None specified Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to regulate discharge of pollutants from point sources. In Washington, the EPA has delegated responsibility of NPDES to

199

GRR/Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process GRR/Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process 4-WA-a State Exploration Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies Geothermal Act 78.60 RCW Geothermal Rules 332-17 WAC Triggers None specified Geothermal exploration in Washington requires a Geothermal Exploration Permit from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR) for invasive exploration or drilling. Operations that require an exploration or drilling permit will also require the developer to initiate the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). In Washington geothermal resources are regulated under Chapter 78.60 RCW

200

GRR/Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease GRR/Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease 3-WA-d - State Land Lease.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies RCW 79-13-020 RCW 79-13-140 RCW 79-13-150 WAC 332-22-030 WAC 332-22-105 WAC 332-22-110 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process used to lease state lands in Washington. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR) oversees the land leasing process through the Commissioner of Public Lands ("commissioner"). The WSDNR may lease state lands for purposes it deems advisable, including commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural, and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

GRR/Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process GRR/Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Transportation Regulations & Policies WAC 468-34-060 WAC 468-34-080 WAC 468-34-110 WAC 468-34-160 WAC 468-34-170 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process of obtaining a franchise or permit through a state highway right of way in Washington State. A utility permit or franchise is required for occupancy of a highway right of way by utility facilities, including private lines. WAC 468-34-160. The process is

202

GRR/Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process GRR/Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.03 Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.44 Triggers None specified Washington uses a prior appropriation system for the distribution of both surface water and ground water rights in which water users receive the right to use water on a "first in time, first in right" basis. Under Washington law, the waters of Washington belong collectively to the public

203

GRR/Section 19-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right 9-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right 19-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington 90.03.380 Revised Code of Washington 90.44.100 Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.80 Triggers None specified Much of Washington's public waters have been accounted for through water right claims, permits, or certificates. As a result, many individuals seeking water rights try to acquire existing water rights already in use or change the use of a current water right they already hold. Certain elements

204

NEURAL NETWORKS FOR DISCRETE TOMOGRAPHY K.J. Batenburg a W.A. Kosters b  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NEURAL NETWORKS FOR DISCRETE TOMOGRAPHY K.J. Batenburg a W.A. Kosters b a Mathematical Institute of crystalline solids at atomic resolution from electron microscopic images can be considered the ``holy grail

Kosters, Walter

205

DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: TC Legend Homes, Bellingham, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready home in Bellingham, WA, that achieves HERS 43 without PV or HERS 13 with 3.2 kW of PV.

206

GRR/Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease GRR/Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease 3-WA-a State Geothermal Lease.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies Chapter 79.14 RCW Chapter 344-12 WAC Triggers None specified The State of Washington is still in the process of developing and finalizing the rules and regulations related to geothermal leases on state lands; however, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR) expects the process to be similar to the process for leasing state lands for oil and natural gas development. The rules and regulations for

207

GRR/Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process GRR/Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified In the state of Washington, cultural resource concerns are integrated as early as possible into the planning for capital projects and are protected if discovered during construction. Washington defines "Cultural resources" as archeological and historical sites and artifacts, and traditional areas or items of religious, ceremonial and social uses to affected tribes. Washington defines an "Archaeological resource" as any

208

GRR/Section 19-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview 9-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview 19-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.03 Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.44 RCW 90.44.050 Triggers None specified Similar to many western states, only a small amount of water is available for appropriation in Washington. As a result, Washington has developed a comprehensive regulatory scheme for the distribution of water rights and use of water in the state. Washington employs a prior appropriation or

209

Property:FIPS County Code | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

FIPS County Code FIPS County Code Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Pages using the property "FIPS County Code" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Abbeville County, South Carolina + 001 + Acadia Parish, Louisiana + 001 + Accomack County, Virginia + 001 + Ada County, Idaho + 001 + Adair County, Iowa + 001 + Adair County, Kentucky + 001 + Adair County, Missouri + 001 + Adair County, Oklahoma + 001 + Adams County, Colorado + 001 + Adams County, Idaho + 003 + Adams County, Illinois + 001 + Adams County, Indiana + 001 + Adams County, Iowa + 003 + Adams County, Mississippi + 001 + Adams County, Nebraska + 001 + Adams County, North Dakota + 001 + Adams County, Ohio + 001 + Adams County, Pennsylvania + 001 +

210

Solar Maid Ventura County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Maid Ventura County Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Solar Maid Ventura County Name: Solar Maid Ventura County Place: Lancaster, California Region: Southern CA Area Sector: Solar...

211

A synthesis of ethnohistorical materials concerning the administration of Federal Indian policy among the Yakima, Umatilla, and Nez Perce Indian people: Working draft  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

For the purposes of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, and the Nez Perce Tribe have been accorded the status of ''Affected Indian Tribe'' and have become party to the proceedings to determine a suitable location for the nation's first commercial waste repository. Each of the Tribes has expressed concerns about the suitability of the Hanford Site in eastern Washington. These concerns, in general, address the proposed repository's effects on traditional spiritual beliefs and cultural practices, on tribal sovereignty and the Tribes' right to self-government, on the natural resources under tribal management jurisdiction, and on the health and socioeconomic characteristics of the Tribes' reservation communities. The Yakima, Umatilla, and Nez Perce have distinctive cultural traditions that may be adversely affected by activities related to the Basalt Waste Isolation Project (BWIP). Further, the Tribes enjoy a unique relationship with the federal government. Because of their distinctive cultures and governmental status, particular attention will be paid to expressed interests of the Tribes, and to ways in which these interests may be affected by the repository program. Monitoring is needed to describe current conditions among the Affected Tribes' populations, to describe BWIP site characterization activities affecting the Tribes, and to measure any changes in these conditions that may occur as a direct result of site characterization. This paper reports our first efforts at gathering historical information. It summarizes materials contained in two sources: the reports of field agents to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs (1854-1936), and the dockets of the Indian Claims Commission. 24 refs., 3 figs.

Liebow, E.B.; Younger, C.A.; Broyles, J.A.

1987-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

EIS-0505: EPA Notice of Availability of Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Vantage to Pomona Heights 230 kV Transmission Line Project, Yakima, Grant, Benton, and Kittitas Counties, Washington

213

Summary Report for Bureau of Fisheries Stream Habitat Surveys : Yakima River Basin, 1934-1942, Final Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains summary reports of stream habitat surveys, conducted in the Yakima River basin, by the Bureau of Fisheries (BOF, now National Marine Fisheries Service) from 1934-1942. These surveys were part of a larger project to survey streams in the Columbia River basin that provided, or had provided, spawning and rearing habitat for salmon and steelhead (Rich, 1948). The purpose of the survey was, as described by Rich, 'to determine the present condition of the various tributaries with respect to their availability and usefulness for the migration, breeding, and rearing of migratory fishes'. Current estimates of the loss of anadromous fish habitat in the Columbia River Basin are based on a series of reports published from 1949-1952 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The reports were brief, qualitative accounts of over 5000 miles of stream surveys conducted by the BOF from 1934-1946 (Bryant, 1949; Bryant and Parkhurst, 1950; Parkhurst, 1950a-c; Parkhurst et al., 1950). Despite their brevity, these BOF reports have formed the basis for estimating fish habitat losses and conditions in the Columbia River Basin (Fulton, 1968, 1970; Thompson, 1976; NPPC, 1986). Recently, the field notebooks from the BOF surveys were discovered. The data is now archived and stored in the Forest Science DataBank at Oregon State University (Stafford et al., 1984; 1988). These records are the earliest and most comprehensive documentation available of the condition and extent of anadromous fish habitat before hydropower development in the Columbia River Basin. They provide the baseline data for quantifying changes and setting a benchmark for future restoration of anadromous fish habitat throughout the Basin. The summaries in this book are exact replicates of the originals. Due to discrepancies between the field data and the summaries, the database should be used to assess pool and substrate conditions. This data is available from the Bonneville Power Administration. The Bureau of Fisheries survey is unique because it is the only long-term data set that quantifies fish habitat in a manner that is replicable over time; no other similar work is known to exist. Other surveys, such as Thompson and Haas (1960), inventoried extensive areas in a manner that was mostly qualitative, subjectively estimating physical characteristics like bank cover and stream shading. Spawning, rearing, and resting habitat were not systematically quantified to allow comparisons over time. Knowledge of the past and present quantity and quality of anadromous fish habitat in the Columbia River Basin is essential to any effort to enhance fish populations. Habitat condition is a key element in monitoring and evaluating progress towards the doubling goal. Integration of this information into the Columbia River Fish and Wildlife Plan can provide the baseline information to greatly enhance understanding of past, present, and future habitat conditions in the basin to provide for improved management decisions.

McIntosh, Bruce A.; Clark, Sharon E.; Sedell, James R.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Snohomish County Biodiesel Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Snohomish County in western Washington State began converting its vehicle fleet to use a blend of biodiesel and petroleum diesel in 2005. As prices for biodiesel rose due to increased demand for this cleaner-burning fuel, Snohomish County looked to its farmers to ???¢????????grow???¢??????? this fuel locally. Suitable seed crops that can be crushed to extract oil for use as biodiesel feedstock include canola, mustard, and camelina. The residue, or mash, has high value as an animal feed. County farmers began with 52 acres of canola and mustard crops in 2006, increasing to 250 acres and 356 tons in 2008. In 2009, this number decreased to about 150 acres and 300 tons due to increased price for mustard seed.

Terrill Chang; Deanna Carveth

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

Jasper County Comprehensive Plan Adoption Draft  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Jasper County Comprehensive Plan Adoption Draft Comprehensive Plan Jasper County, IN #12;#12;Table Mandate.......................................vii Jasper County's Fulfillment of the Mandate of Major Needs for Jasper County ...............5 Additional Opportunities

216

MINERAL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Board of Board of MINERAL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Telephone: 702-945-2446 Fax: 702-945-0706 P.O. Box 4150 Hawthorne, Nevada 89415 JACKIE WALLIS, Chairman GOVERNING BOARD FOR THE TOWNS OF DAN DILLARD, Vice Chairman HAWTHORNE, LUNING AND MINA BOB LYBARGER, Member LIQUOR BOARD GAMING BOARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington, DC 20585 Dear Sirs: Attached are the comments for modification of the Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry(NOI) provided to the Board of Mineral County Commissioners, in a letter dated January

217

Petroleum County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Petroleum County Secondary Data Analysis July 23, 2012 1 Community Health Data, MT Dept American Diabetes Association (2012) Region 3 (South Central) ­ Judith Basin, Fergus, Petroleum* #12; Petroleum County Secondary Data Analysis July 23, 2012 2 Socioeconomic Measures1

Maxwell, Bruce D.

218

Gas Pipelines, County Roads (Indiana)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A contract with any Board of County Commissioners is required prior to the construction of a pipeline, conduit, or private drain across or along any county highway. The contract will include terms...

219

E-Print Network 3.0 - artillery charge system Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Training Ranges Camp Guernsey, WY Artillery Range Yakima Training Center, WA... Ranges CFB Valcartier, Quebec Training Ranges Jefferson Proving Ground, IN Artillery Range Fort...

220

Washington County Comprehensive plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Overview of Washington County's Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Steep Slopes 82 Inventory & Assessment - Karst 83 Natural Resources Recommendations What Are the Key Findings from the Research? 13 Land Use 13 Economic Development 13 Housing 13 Natural

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Dona Ana County Experimental  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lands BLM BOR DOD DOE FWS NPS OTHER USFS SOL141 Albuquerque Santa Fe Las Cruces New Mexico Solar Energy Afton Red Sand Mason Draw Mescalero Apache Reservation State Line County Boundary Solar Energy Study Study Areas in New Mexico Map Prepared June 5, 2009 Property of the U.S. Departments of Energy

Laughlin, Robert B.

222

Property:Building/County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type Page. County Pages using the property "Building/County" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0002 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0003 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0004 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0005 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0006 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0007 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0008 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0009 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0010 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0011 + Stockholm County, Sweden +

223

EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona 41: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona Summary This EIS, prepared by the Bureau of Land Management with DOE's Western Area Power Administration as a cooperating agency, evaluated the environmental impacts of a proposed wind energy project on public lands in Mohave County, Arizona. Power generated by this project would tie to the electrical power grid through an interconnection to one of Western's transmission lines.The project website is http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/energy/wind/mohave.html. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download Draft EIS posted at http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/energy/wind/mohave/reports/DEIS.html.

224

Santa Clara County - Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Green Building Policy for County Government Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings Santa Clara County - Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Santa Clara County Executive's Office In February 2006, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approved a Green Building Policy for all county-owned or leased buildings. The standards were revised again in September 2009. All new buildings over 5,000 square feet are required to meet LEED Silver

225

GRR/Section 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies WAC 173-401-500 WAC 173-401-800 WAC 173-401-810 WAC 173-401-735 WAC 173-401-610 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process for obtaining an Air Operating Permit in Washington State. The Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) issues Air Operating Permit under WAC 173-401. An Air Operating Permit is required if a facility has the potential to emit

226

GRR/Section 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified The Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. Washington uses an Environmental Checklist and Environmental Review (ER) to provide information to help government agencies identify impacts from their proposals and determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary.

227

MEMORANDUM : APPROVAL TO MODIFY ADVANCE WAIVER OF PATENT RIGHTS W(A)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

: APPROVAL TO MODIFY ADVANCE WAIVER OF PATENT RIGHTS W(A) : APPROVAL TO MODIFY ADVANCE WAIVER OF PATENT RIGHTS W(A) 2009-047 GRANTED FOR US SOLAR HOLDINGS LLC UNDER AGREEMENT NO. DE-FC36-08G018 155 US Solar Holdings LLC ("US Solar") has requested that the Department of Energy ("DOE") modify or clarify the cost share requirements set forth in the statement of considerations for the granted advance patent waiver W(A) 2009-047. Specifically, the statement of considerations, as originally granted, states the following: The total cost of the award is approximately $4 million with the Petitioner providing about 50% cost sharing. This waiver is contingent upon the Petitioner maintaining, in aggregate, the above cost sharing percentage over the course of the agreement. Rather than just provide an aggregate cost share requirement of 50% for the agreement, US Solar

228

GRR/Section 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

form form View source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Regulations & Policies RCW 80.50.60(1) WAC 463-60 RCW 80.50.090(2) WAC 463-30-270 WAC 463-30-320 Triggers None specified Under RCW 80.50.60(1) a developer may not begin construction of a new energy facility site until they obtain Energy Facility Siting certification

229

EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington The purpose of this Supplement Analysis is to determine if a Supplemental EIS is needed to analyze the use of the WDFW's existing Yakima Hatchery for rearing and possibly incubating coho. Additional acclimation and research activities for coho are also analyzed. DOE/EIS-0169-SA-03, Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington (March 2000)

230

Property:Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

AddlPlaceCounty AddlPlaceCounty Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty Property Type Page Pages using the property "Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Allegany County Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Allegany County, Maryland + Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credit (Maryland) + Anne Arundel County, Maryland + Anne Arundel County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Anne Arundel County, Maryland + B Baltimore County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credit (Maryland) + Baltimore County, Maryland + Baltimore County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Baltimore County, Maryland + Brownfield Development Tax Abatements (Alabama) + Alabama + C Calvert County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Calvert County, Maryland +

231

GRR/Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit GRR/Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies WAC 173-303-020 WAC 173-303-060 WAC 173-303-070 WAC 173-303-071 WAC 173-303-072 WAC 173-303-081 WAC 173-303-082 WAC 173-303-090 WAC 173-303-100 WAC 173-303-110 WAC 173-303-140 WAC 173-303-220 WAC 173-303-281 WAC 173-303-282 WAC 173-303-803 WAC 173-303-845 Triggers None specified The Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) oversees the permitting process for dangerous and solid waste. In Washington, a developer must obtain a permit if they handle dangerous waste and solid waste and are

232

DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Clifton View Homes, Whidbey Island, WA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready home on Whidbey Island, WA, that scores HERS 37 without PV or HERS -13 with 10 kW PV, enough to power the home and an electric car. The two-story custom home...

233

Application of a modified denitrifying bacteria method for analyzing groundwater and vadose zone pore water nitrate at the Hanford Site, WA, USA.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the Hanford Site, WA, USA. Woods, Katharine N. ; Singleton,reside at DOE sites across the USA. Nitrate concentrations >

Woods, Katharine N.; Singleton, Michael J.; Conrad, Mark

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Queen Anne's County- Solar Zoning  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Queen Anne's County zoning code allows for ground mounted solar arrays in areas zoned as "open space," "agricultural," and "countryside" districts.

235

LOCATION: Johnson County Sheriff's Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

LOCATION: Johnson County Sheriff's Office Criminalistics Laboratory 11890 Sunset Drive Olathe, Kansas 66061 DATE: JULY 15TH - JULY 18TH, 2013 TUITION: MAFS MEMBERS: 550 Non-MAFS...

236

Mn/DOT County Road Safety Plans  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Roads Program !! Minnesota Central Safety Funds !! Foster safety culture among county stakeholders 41 Mn/DOT County Road Safety Plans CTS Annual Research Conference April 27 & 28, 2010 Howard Preston & Objectives !! Project Overview !! Schedule, Participating Counties, Approach !! Safety Emphasis Areas

Minnesota, University of

237

BOULDER COUNTY CUSTOMERS GET ENERGYSMART AND SAVE  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Of the $25 million grant that Boulder County, Colorado, received through the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), funding was allocated to three different entities: Boulder County, Garfield County, and...

238

Rosebud County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.6% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 (Region 1) 455.5 543.2 1 Community County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Rosebud County Secondary Data Analysis

Maxwell, Bruce D.

239

Anemometer Data (Wind Speed, Direction) for Quinault #3, WA (2004 - 2005) |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Quinault #3, WA (2004 - 2005) Quinault #3, WA (2004 - 2005) Dataset Summary Description Wind data collected from Quinault Indian Reservation in Washington from an anemometer as part of the Native American anemometer loan program. Monthly mean wind speed is available for 2004 through 2005, as is wind direction and turbulence data. Data is reported from a height of 20 m. The data was originally made available by Wind Powering America, a DOE Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) program. A dynamic map displaying all available data from DOE anemometer loan programs is available http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/anemometerloans/projects.asp. Source EERE Date Released December 02nd, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated December 02nd, 2010 (4 years ago) Keywords wind

240

DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study, Clifton View Homes, Coupeville, WA, Systems Home  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Case-study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready Home on Whidbey Island, WA, that scored HERS 45 without PV. This 2,908 ft2 custom/system home has a SIP roof and walls, R-20 rigid foam under slab, triple-pane windows, ground source heat pump for radiant floor heat, and a unique balanced ventilation system using separate exhaust fans to bring air into and out of home.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study TC Legend, Seattle, WA, Custom Home  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready Home in Seattle, WA, that scored HERS 37 without PV, HERS -1 with PV. This 1,915 ft2 custom home has SIP walls and roof, R-20 XPS under the slab, triple-pane windows, an air to water heat pump for radiant heat, and balanced ventilation with timer controlled fans to bring in and exhaust air.

242

DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study, Dwell Development, Seattle, WA, Systems Home  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Case study of a DOE Zero Energy Ready Home in Seattle, WA, that scored HERS 34 without PV. This 2,000 ft2 system home has R-45 double-stud walls, an unvented flat roof with 2 inches of spray foam plus 18 inches blown cellulose, R-42 XPS under slab, triple-pane windows, and a ductless mini-split heat pump.

243

RECIPIENT:Monroe County  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

p,, '~~' p,, '~~' RECIPIENT:Monroe County u.s. DEP . .\RTlVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERJl.1INATION PROJECT TITLE: Landfill Gas Utilization Plant Page 1 01'3 STATE: NY Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pro<:urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number CDP DE-EEOO3123 GFO-O003123-001 EE3123 Based on my review of the infonnation concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA), I have made the following determination : ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.21 Methane The installation, modification, operation, and removal of commercially available methane gas recovery and gas recovery utilization systems installed within a previously disturbed or developed area on or contiguous to an existlng

244

County\PAAN  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 1998 9, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 COMMENTS TO THE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT NOTICE OF INQUIRY To whom it may concern: The attached comments by the Clark County, Nevada Department of Comprehensive Planning, Nuclear Waste Division, are in reference to a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) released by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to Section 170p of the Atomic Energy Act. From the perspective of local government and the public, we support continuing the comprehensive provisions of the Price-Anderson Act. The need to have available sufficient financial resources to ameliorate impacts from nuclear incidents will be increasingly important in the future. The potential for accidents, for example, will be

245

350 City County Building  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

(. (. - ,- Department of Eilqgy Washington, DC20585 ,. i x \ .The Honorable Wellington E. Webb .' '. ' 350 City County Building / Denver, Colorado 80202 ., ; Dear Mayor Webb: ., ~, Secretary of Energy' Hazel O'Leary has announced's new approach to openness in the Department of Energy,(OOE) and its communications with the public. In support of this initiative, we,are pleased to forward the'enclosed'information related to the former Uhiversity of Denver Research Institute site in your, jurisdiction that performed work for DOE's predecessor,agencies. This' i~nformation'is provided for your.informatibn, use,,and retention.. ; DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) is responsible for identification of sitesused by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining

246

Sonoma County Solar Implementation Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Solar power and energy efficiency constitute a win?win formula to jump start the local economy and effectively respond to the climate change crisis. To address these important opportunities, this Sonoma County Solar Implementation Plan was prepared by Solar Sonoma County, a nonprofit public/private consortium of local governments, businesses, other entities and individuals working collaboratively to identify and implement initiatives to promote, expand, and accelerate solar power and energy efficiency throughout Sonoma County, under a U.S. Department of Energy Solar America Cities grant administered by the City of Santa Rosa.

247

Santa Barbara County, California Data Dashboard  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The data dashboard for Santa Barbara County, California, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

248

St. Lucie County Summary of Reported Data  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary of data reported by Better Buildings Neighborhood Program partner St. Lucie County, Florida.

249

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fayette Fayette County, Pennsylvania to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

250

RECIPI ENT;Kitsap County u.s. DEPARTlvIENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ENT;Kitsap County ENT;Kitsap County u.s. DEPARTlvIENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENT ER NEPA DETERlVITNATION PROJECT TITLE: EECBG * Energy Service Corps (SOW) Page 1 01'2 STATE: WA Funding Opportunity Announcem ent Number DE-FOA..QOOOO13 Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EEOOOO853 '1t;..o -6ObC>g5~- 0(.::)\ EE81128 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the foUowing determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Aclions 10 conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase Ihe indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances, These actions may involve financial and technical

251

Gratiot County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Gratiot County Gratiot County Jump to: navigation, search Name Gratiot County Facility Gratiot County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Ivenergy Developer Ivenergy Energy Purchaser Detroit Edison Location Breckenridge MI Coordinates 43.38009947°, -84.4896698° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.38009947,"lon":-84.4896698,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

252

Power County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search Name Power County Facility Power County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner CG Power Solutions Developer CG Power Solutions Energy Purchaser PacifiCorp Location American Falls ID Coordinates 42.66135774°, -112.9727554° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.66135774,"lon":-112.9727554,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

253

Wibaux County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 455.5 543.2 1 Community County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Wibaux County Secondary Data Analysis July 23, 2012 2

Maxwell, Bruce D.

254

Pondera County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Pondera County Secondary Data Analysis

Maxwell, Bruce D.

255

Dawson County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 455.5 543.2 1 Community of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Dawson County Secondary Data Analysis July 23

Maxwell, Bruce D.

256

Phillips County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Myocardial Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 455.5 543.2 1 of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Phillips County Secondary Data Analysis July 23

Maxwell, Bruce D.

257

Hill County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.0% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 (Region 2) 455.5 543.2 1 Community) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Hill County

Maxwell, Bruce D.

258

Lincoln County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.0% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 466.5 (Region 5) 455.5 543.2 1 Community of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Lincoln County Secondary Data Analysis July 23

Maxwell, Bruce D.

259

Toole County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 455.5 543.2 1 Community) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Toole County Secondary Data

Maxwell, Bruce D.

260

Glacier County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 (Region 2) 455.5 543.2 1 Community) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Glacier County

Maxwell, Bruce D.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Teton County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Teton County Secondary Data Analysis July 23, 2012 2

Maxwell, Bruce D.

262

Geothermal Development Plan: Pima County  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Pima County is located entirely within the Basin and Range physiographic province in which geothermal resources are known to occur. Continued growth as indicated by such factors as population growth, employment and income will require large amounts of energy. It is believed that geothermal energy could provide some of the energy that will be needed. Potential users of geothermal energy within the county are identified.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

E-Print Network 3.0 - area nye county Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nye County Lincoln County Beaver County Iron County State Line County Boundary Solar Energy Study... Area China Lake Naval Weapons Center Nellis Air Force Base Nellis Air Force...

264

E-Print Network 3.0 - areas nye county Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nye County Lincoln County Beaver County Iron County State Line County Boundary Solar Energy Study... Area China Lake Naval Weapons Center Nellis Air Force Base Nellis Air Force...

265

KITSAP COUNTY POWERS UP WITH ENERGY EFFICIENCY | Department of...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

KITSAP COUNTY POWERS UP WITH ENERGY EFFICIENCY KITSAP COUNTY POWERS UP WITH ENERGY EFFICIENCY KITSAP COUNTY POWERS UP WITH ENERGY EFFICIENCY To establish a market for energy...

266

Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility Facility Winnebago County Landfill Gas Sector Biomass Facility Type Landfill Gas Location Winnebago County, Wisconsin Coordinates...

267

Rutland County Summary of Reported Data | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Summary of Reported Data Rutland County Summary of Reported Data Summary of data reported by Better Buildings Neighborhood Program partner Rutland County, Vermont. Rutland County...

268

St. Lucie County Summary of Reported Data | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

St. Lucie County Summary of Reported Data St. Lucie County Summary of Reported Data Summary of data reported by Better Buildings Neighborhood Program partner St. Lucie County,...

269

File:06-WA-b - Washington Construction Storm Water Permit.pdf | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

File File Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » File:06-WA-b - Washington Construction Storm Water Permit.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Metadata File:06-WA-b - Washington Construction Storm Water Permit.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 Go! next page → next page → Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 60 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 2 pages) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 15:28, 6 December 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 15:28, 6 December 2013 1,275 × 1,650, 2 pages (60 KB) Alevine (Talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 December 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 15:25, 6 December 2013 1,275 × 1,650, 2 pages (60 KB) Alevine (Talk | contribs)

270

File:EIA-Eastern-OR-WA-BOE.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eastern-OR-WA-BOE.pdf Eastern-OR-WA-BOE.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Eastern Oregon and Washington By 2001 BOE Reserve Class Size of this preview: 776 × 600 pixels. Full resolution ‎(1,650 × 1,275 pixels, file size: 460 KB, MIME type: application/pdf) Description Eastern Oregon and Washington By 2001 BOE Reserve Class Sources Energy Information Administration Authors Samuel H. Limerick; Lucy Luo; Gary Long; David F. Morehouse; Jack Perrin; Robert F. King Related Technologies Oil, Natural Gas Creation Date 2005-09-01 Extent Regional Countries United States UN Region Northern America States Oregon, Washington File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 18:00, 20 December 2010 Thumbnail for version as of 18:00, 20 December 2010 1,650 × 1,275 (460 KB) MapBot (Talk | contribs) Automated bot upload

271

RECIPIENT:Lake County, FL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lake County, FL Lake County, FL u.s. DEPARTIIIEN T OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CEN T ER NEPA DETERlIJJNATION PROJECf TITLE: Lake County, FL EECBG SOW (S) Page lof2 STATE: FL Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Numbcr CID Numbtr OE·FOA-OOOOO13 DE·EE00Q0786.001 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed adion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized undtr DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: ex. EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 65.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conserva tion, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

272

Geothermal development plan: Maricopa county  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Maricopa county is the area of Arizona receiving top priority since it contains over half of the state's population. The county is located entirely within the Basin and Range physiographic region in which geothermal resources are known to occur. Several approaches were taken to match potential users to geothermal resources. One approach involved matching some of the largest facilities in the county to nearby geothermal resources. Other approaches involved identifying industrial processes whose heat requirements are less than the average assessed geothermal reservoir temperature of 110/sup 0/C (230/sup 0/F). Since many of the industries are located on or near geothermal resources, geothermal energy potentially could be adapted to many industrial processes.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

Rutland County, Vermont | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Rutland County, Vermont Rutland County, Vermont NeighborWorks H.E.A.T. Squad Location: West Rutland, Vermont Seed Funding: 4.5 million Target Building Types: Residential Website:...

274

San Diego County- Wind Regulations (California)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The County of San Diego has established zoning guidelines for wind turbine systems of varying sizes in the unincorporated areas of San Diego County. Wind turbine systems can be classified as small,...

275

Class Host: Johnson County Sheriff's Office Criminalist...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Class Host: Johnson County Sheriff's Office Criminalistics Laboratory Where: Johnson County Crime Lab 11890 S. Sunset Dr. Olathe, KS 66061 When: August 28-30, 2013 3 Days (24 hrs)...

276

EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS, prepared by the Bureau of Land Management with DOEs Western Area Power Administration as a cooperating agency, evaluated the environmental impacts of a proposed wind energy project on public lands in Mohave County, Arizona. Power generated by this project would tie to the electrical power grid through an interconnection to one of Westerns transmission lines.

277

Fayette County, Pennsylvania Summary of Reported Data  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The summary of reported data for Fayette County, Pennsylvania, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

278

Jefferson County, Mississippi: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Mississippi Fayette, Mississippi Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleJeffersonCounty,Mississippi&oldid2949...

279

Solar Applications to Multiple County Buildings Feasibility Study  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This study was requested by Salt Lake County in an effort to obtain a cursory overview of solar electric and solar thermal application possibilities on the rooftops of existing county buildings. The subject buildings represent various County Divisions: Aging Services, Community Services, County Health, County Library, Parks & Recreation, Public Works, County Sheriff and Youth Services. There are fifty two buildings included in the study.

280

LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRANSFER GUIDE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRANSFER GUIDE KEY Unless stated, web-based courses 268 NURS 201 BIOG 273 BIOL 326 #12;CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY 2 LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY 3 LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRANSFER GUIDE DEPARTMENT LCCC CASE History (continued) HSTR 262

Rollins, Andrew M.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Transit Rider Information King County Metro Transit  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transit Rider Information King County Metro Transit Rider Information (206) 553-3000 http the On the Move Blog http://www.seattle.gov/transportation King County Road Services Division Road Maintenance closely with King County Metro Transit, the Seattle School District, local universities, hospitals

Queitsch, Christine

282

Public Health County of Santa Cruz  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Public Health Division County of Santa Cruz HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY POST OFFICE BOX 962, 1080 Date: December 3, 2009 Phone: 831-454-4000 Email: hsadocpio@co.santa-cruz.ca.us County Health Department Announces Flu Vaccine Clinic Santa Cruz County Public Health will hold an additional walk

California at Santa Cruz, University of

283

rrigation R de County W  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Progra all rebate pa on system th proved by th List e following ir f a rain senso troller). f a soil Depart de County to ncy will cau capes. Appro he assessmen ce. Assessm be both cost- am rebate, al wat hrubs). e matched pre r. d by UCU). Participants invoices mu ubmitted mu f the reports a rebate

Jawitz, James W.

284

Workforce Solutions for Tarrant County  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

East 8. East Texas 9. West Central 10. Upper Rio Grande 11. Permian Basin 12. Concho Valley 13. Heart of Texas 14. Capital Area 15. Rural Capital 16. Brazos Valley 17. Deep East Texas 18. South East Texas 19. Golden Crescent 20. Alamo 21. South Texas 22. Coastal Bend 23. Lower Rio Grande Valley 24. Cameron County

Texas at Arlington, University of

285

Forrest County Geothermal Energy Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Project objectives: Retrofit two county facilities with high efficiency geothermal equipment (The two projects combined comprise over 200,000 square feet). Design and Construct a demonstration Facility where the public can see the technology and associated savings. Work with established partnerships to further spread the application of geothermal energy in the region.

286

Garfield County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Pneumonia, CLRD*, Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Garfield County Secondary Data Analysis July 23

Maxwell, Bruce D.

287

Prairie County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT. Heart Disease, Cancer 2. CLRD* 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Prairie County Secondary Data Analysis July 23, 2012 2

Maxwell, Bruce D.

288

Missoula County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Myocardial Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 3.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 466.5 (Region 5) 455 Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12

Maxwell, Bruce D.

289

Gallatin County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 2.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 416.6 (Region 4) 455.5 543.2 1 Community Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3

Maxwell, Bruce D.

290

Flathead County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Myocardial Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 3.7% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 466.5 (Region 5) 455 Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12

Maxwell, Bruce D.

291

Powell County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 3.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 416.6 455.5 543.2 1 Community Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12

Maxwell, Bruce D.

292

Valley County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 455.5 543.2 1 Community Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. Diabetes 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Valley County Secondary Data Analysis July 23, 2012 2

Maxwell, Bruce D.

293

Sanders County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.0% (Region 5) 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 466.5 (Region 5) 455 Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3

Maxwell, Bruce D.

294

Mineral County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.0% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 466.5 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries**, CLRD*, Cerebrovascular Disease 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Mineral County

Maxwell, Bruce D.

295

Liberty County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 455.5 543.2 1 Community Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12

Maxwell, Bruce D.

296

Geothermal development plan: Pima County  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Pima County Area Development evaluated the county-wide market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified four potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 100{sup 0}C (212{sup 0}F), and in addition, one area is identified as having a temperature of 147{sup 0}F (297{sup 0}F). Geothermal resources are found to occur in Tucson where average population growth rates of two to three percent per year are expected over the next 40 years. Rapid growth in the manufacturing sector and the existence of major copper mines provide opportunities for the direct utilization of geothermal energy. However, available water supplies are identified as a major constraint to projected growth. The study also includes a regional energy analysis, future predictions for energy consumption and energy prices. A major section of the report is aimed at identifying potential geothermal users in Pima County and providing projections of maximum economic geothermal utilization. The study identifies 115 firms in 32 industrial classes that have some potential for geothermal use. In addition, 26 agribusiness firms were found in the county.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

DOE Challenge Home Case Study TC Legend, Seattle, WA, Custom Home  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TC Legend TC Legend Homes Seattle, WA BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE DOE Challenge Home builders are in the top 1% of builders in the country meeting the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Every DOE Challenge Home starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Then, even more advanced technologies are designed in for a home that goes above and beyond current code to give you the superior quality construction, HVAC, appliances, indoor air quality, safety, durability, comfort, and solar-ready components along with ultra-low or no utility bills. This provides homeowners with a quality home that will last for generations to come.

298

DOE Challenge Home Case Study, Dwell Development, Seattle, WA, Systems Home  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Dwell Dwell Development Seattle, WA BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE DOE Challenge Home builders are in the top 1% of builders in the country meeting the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Every DOE Challenge Home starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Then, even more advanced technologies are designed in for a home that goes above and beyond current code to give you the superior quality construction, HVAC, appliances, indoor air quality, safety, durability, comfort, and solar-ready components along with ultra-low or no utility bills. This provides homeowners with a quality home that will last for generations to come.

299

DOE Challenge Home Case Study, Clifton View Homes, Coupeville, WA, Systems Home  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Clifton View Clifton View Homes Coupeville, WA BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE DOE Challenge Home builders are in the top 1% of builders in the country meeting the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Every DOE Challenge Home starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Then, even more advanced technologies are designed in for a home that goes above and beyond current code to give you the superior quality construction, HVAC, appliances, indoor air quality, safety, durability, comfort, and solar-ready components along with ultra-low or no utility bills. This provides homeowners with a quality home that will last for generations to come.

300

Built environments and physical activity : improving understanding of the moderators  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in the United States: King County-Seattle, WA and Baltimore-the County Executive in King County, WA, and multiple stateblock groups in Seattle-King County, WA, and Baltimore-

Ding, Ding

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Nr. 077 / 2014 // 6. Mai 2014 Prof. Ngugi wa Thiong'o whrend seiner Rede zur Annahme der Ehrendoktorwrde  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nr. 077 / 2014 // 6. Mai 2014 1/5 Prof. Ngugi wa Thiong'o während seiner Rede zur Annahme der der afrikanischen Partneruniversitäten im Netzwerk der BIGSAS würden den Geehrten begleiten. Die Rede

Ullmann, G. Matthias

302

October 14 WA Division Newsletter Page 4 Tool durability and steel microstructure in friction stir welding of mild steel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

October 14 WA Division Newsletter Page 4 Tool durability and steel microstructure in friction stir welding of mild steel A. De1 , H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia2 and T. DebRoy3 1 Indian Institute of Technology- ium alloys has been applied to the FSW of steel. The calculations were extended to predict

Cambridge, University of

303

County Wind Ordinance Standards | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

County Wind Ordinance Standards County Wind Ordinance Standards County Wind Ordinance Standards < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Local Government Residential Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State California Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider California Energy Commission [http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_45_bill_200... Assembly Bill 45] of 2009 authorized counties to adopt ordinances to provide for the installation of small wind systems (50 kW or smaller) outside urbanized areas but within the county's jurisdiction. The bill also addressed specific aspects of a typical wind ordinance and established the limiting factors by which a county's wind ordinance can be no more restrictive. Counties may freely make more lenient ordinances, but AB 45

304

Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) < Back Eligibility Commercial Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Colorado Program Type Building Energy Code Provider Eagle County In an effort to reduce county-wide energy consumption and improve the environment, Eagle County established their own efficient building code (ECO-Green Build) which applies to all new construction and renovations/additions over 50% of the existing floor area of single-family and multifamily residences, and commercial buildings.

305

Benton County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Benton County Benton County Place Tennessee Utility Id 1578 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png GSA 1 General Power Commercial GSA 2 General Power Commercial GSA 3 General Power Commercial GSB Industrial General Power Service- TDGSA-VULCAN Industrial Outdoor Lighting Service Lighting RS Residential Residential SMSB Industrial SMSC Industrial SMSD Industrial WS-DE Commercial WS-MTOU Wholesale Average Rates Residential: $0.1030/kWh Commercial: $0.1110/kWh Industrial: $0.0875/kWh References

306

R[CIPIENT:Loudoun County  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Loudoun County Loudoun County u.s. DEPARTl\ IENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\lINATION PROJEcr TITLE: EECBG Funded Projects - SOW (S) Page I of2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pr(l(urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number DE-EEOO00868 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45t.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

307

R[CIPIENT:Pima County  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pima County Pima County u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlHINATION PROJECf TITLE: Activity#13 Garage and Shops Page 1 01'2 STATE: AZ. Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOOD13 DE-EEOOO08S2 GFO-O000852-OO8 0 Based on my review orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA CompliJmce Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45I.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of polentiatly harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

308

EIS-0048-S: Bonneville Power Administration Proposed FY 1976 Program Facility Location, Okanogan Area Service, Douglas and Okanogan Counties, WA, Supplemental  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Bonneville Power Administration developed this facility location supplemental statement to address a proposal for transmission facilities to serve the Okanogan Valley, Washington. This statement is a supplement to Department of the Interior FES 75-79.

309

Daniels County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 5.5% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 472.3 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT Dept.2 Diabetes Per 100,000 population 1 156.4 (Region 1) 115.4 Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) Per 100 Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease

Maxwell, Bruce D.

310

Chouteau County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT Dept 180.2 182.2 Diabetes Per 100,000 population 1 86.4 115.4 Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) Per 100 Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease

Maxwell, Bruce D.

311

Meagher County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 3.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 416.6 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3

Maxwell, Bruce D.

312

Carbon County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.3% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 510.8 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3

Maxwell, Bruce D.

313

Madison County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 3.4% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 416.6 455.5 543.2 1 Community Health Data, MT Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3

Maxwell, Bruce D.

314

Lake County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.6% Diabetes prevalence 6.7% 6.2% 8.3% Acute Myocardial Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.5% 4.1% 6.0% All 152.7 115.4 Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) Per 100,000 population 1 161.2 147.3 1 Community County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart

Maxwell, Bruce D.

315

Cascade County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.0% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 461.9 (Region 2) 455.5 543.2 1 Community Johnson Foundation (2012) Leading Causes of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12

Maxwell, Bruce D.

316

CORE DATA PROCESSING SOFTWARE PLAN REVIEW | SEATTLE, WA | SEPTEMBER 19-20, 2013Name of Mee)ng Loca)on Date -Change in Slide Master CDP FINAL DESIGN REVIEW  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CORE DATA PROCESSING SOFTWARE PLAN REVIEW | SEATTLE, WA | SEPTEMBER 19-20, 2013Name of Mee DATA PROCESSING SOFTWARE PLAN REVIEW | SEATTLE, WA | SEPTEMBER 19-20, 2013 Outline Single PLAN REVIEW | SEATTLE, WA | SEPTEMBER 19-20, 2013 Background Estimation ­ One of the unsolved issues

Masci, Frank

317

E-Print Network 3.0 - angeles county california Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Collection: Environmental Sciences and Ecology ; Biology and Medicine 55 Camp Pendleton Kings Canyon Summary: County San Bernardino County Kern County Ventura County Los Angeles...

318

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS AND...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Complex Program, Klickitat and Yakima Counties, Washington Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and Yakama...

319

EIS-1069-SA-07: Supplement Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Yakima/Kilickitat Fisheries Project, Noxious Weed Control at Cle Elum and Jack Creek, Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility and Jack Creek Acclimation Site, Kittitas County, Washington

320

EA-1951: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade Transmissio...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade Transmission Line, Benton and Yakima Counties, Washington EA-1951: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

EIS-0505: Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement Vantage to Pomona Heights 230 kV Transmission Line Project, Yakima, Grant, Benton and Kittitas Counties, Washington The...

322

EIS-0505: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0505: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Vantage to Pomona Heights 230 kV Transmission Line Project, Yakima, Grant, Benton and Kittitas Counties, Washington The Bureau of...

323

EIS-0505: Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement Vantage to Pomona Heights 230 kV Transmission Line Project, Yakima, Grant, Benton and Kittitas Counties, Washington The Bureau of...

324

Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing Montgomery County - Green Power Purchasing < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Bioenergy Buying & Making Electricity Solar Water Wind Program Info State Maryland Program Type Green Power Purchasing Provider Montgomery County In October 2000, a group six county agencies, consisting of Montgomery County, Montgomery County Public Schools, Montgomery County Housing Opportunities Commission, Montgomery College, the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, began purchasing power on a competitive basis. In March 2003, the county's energy policy was amended to incorporate the purchase of renewable energy and to expand energy-efficiency efforts. This resolution

325

Franklin County Wind LLC | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Franklin County Wind LLC Franklin County Wind LLC Facility Franklin County Wind Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Franklin County Wind LLC Developer Franklin County Wind LLC Energy Purchaser Merchant (MISO) Location Franklin County IA Coordinates 42.61481487°, -93.36564124° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.61481487,"lon":-93.36564124,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

326

Talbot County DPW | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Talbot County DPW Talbot County DPW Jump to: navigation, search Name Talbot County DPW Facility Talbot County DPW Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Talbot County DPW Energy Purchaser Talbot County DPW Location Easton MD Coordinates 38.8182443°, -76.0331583° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.8182443,"lon":-76.0331583,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

327

Solano and Yolo County Agriculture Current Basis for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Solano and Yolo County Agriculture Current Basis for Planning for the Future November 16, 2011 · Agricultural profiles of Yolo County and Solano Counties ­ Trends and anticipated changes in land use and production ­ What counties can do to support agriculture in Solano and Yolo Counties · Climate Change

California at Davis, University of

328

SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION PROJECT CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA AND JASPER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION PROJECT CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA AND JASPER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA 22 (Kings Island Turning Basin at Stations 98+500 to 100+500) 5 feet deeper (to an authorized navigation #12

US Army Corps of Engineers

329

Catawba County- Green Construction Permitting Incentive Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Catawba County is providing incentives to encourage the construction of sustainably built homes and commercial buildings. Rebates on permit fees and plan reviews are available for certain...

330

Building Green in Greensburg: Kiowa County Courthouse  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This poster highlights energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable features of the renovated high-performing Kiowa County Courthouse building in Greensburg, Kansas.

331

Cervical Cancer Rates in Allegheny County Communities.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Aggregated cervical cancer rates for the 21 year period 1985 through 2005 were age-adjusted and standardized for each neighborhood and municipality in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. (more)

Assenat, Mary Margaret

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

Santa Barbara County, California Data Dashboard | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Program. bbnpbban0003796pmcdashboardy13-q3.xls More Documents & Publications Kansas City Data Dashboard Lowell, Massachusetts Data Dashboard Rutland County Data Dashboard...

333

Boulder County Summary of Reported Data  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary of Reported Data for Boulder County, a partner in the U.S. Department of Energy's Better Buildings Neighborhood Program.

334

Chelan County PUD- Residential Weatherization Rebate Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Chelan County PUD offers cash rebates to residential customers who make energy efficient weatherization improvements to eligible homes. Eligible measures include efficient windows doors as well as...

335

EM, County Install Sewer Line for Development  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Crews are installing a sewer line in the Portsmouth site to connect EMs sewer treatment facility to the Pike County Manufacturing Center, which is being developed.

336

Garfield County, Colorado | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Garfield County Fairgrounds received press coverage for its 2011 installation of a 440-panel rooftop solar electric system atop the riding arena's roof. After the riding arena...

337

Humboldt County RESCO Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

RESCO Project RESCO Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Humboldt County RESCO Project Agency/Company /Organization Redwood Coast Energy Authority Focus Area People and Policy, Renewable Energy, Biomass - Anaerobic Digestion, Biomass - Biofuels, Biomass, Biomass - Biomass Combustion, Biomass - Biomass Gasification, Biomass - Biomass Pyrolysis, Biomass - Landfill Gas, Solar, - Solar Pv, Biomass - Waste To Energy, Wind Phase Create a Vision Resource Type Technical report Availability Free - Publicly Available Publication Date 4/1/2010 Website http://cal-ires.ucdavis.edu/fi Locality Humboldt County References Humboldt County RESCO Project[1] Contents 1 Overview 2 Highlights 3 Environmental Aspects 4 Related Tools 5 References Overview This introductory document outline's Humboldt county's vision for a local

338

A community service directory for Yolo County.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The problem this author has identified is that there is no printed community service directory for Yolo County. In order to provide a printed directory (more)

Bennett, Amy Irene

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

ZIP CODE NUMBERS: SUFFOLK AND NASSAU COUNTY POST OFFICES SUFFOLK COUNTY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

86 #12;87 ZIP CODE NUMBERS: SUFFOLK AND NASSAU COUNTY POST OFFICES SUFFOLK COUNTY Amagansett 11930 11784 Brightwaters 11718 Kings Park 11754 Setauket 11733 Brookhaven 11719 Lake Grove 11755 Shelter River 11739 Port Jefferson Station 11776 NASSAU COUNTY Albertson 11507 Greenvale 11548 Old Westbury

Ohta, Shigemi

340

Geothermal development plan: Pinal county  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Wells drilled in the county provide evidence of geothermal energy sufficient for process heat and space heating and cooling applications. Annual energy consumption was estimated for industries whose process heat requirements are less than 105/sup 0/C (221/sup 0/F). This information was then used to model the introduction of geothermal energy into the process heat market. Also, agriculture and agribusiness industries were identified. Many of these are located on or near a geothermal resource and might be able to utilize geothermal energy in their operations.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

John Melendy: Santa Cruz County Farm Advisor, 1947-1976  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Santa Cruz County Farm Advisor: Early Life page 6 Knaster: ISanta Cruz County Farm Advisor: Early Life page 9 matter ofSanta Cruz County Farm Advisor: Early Life page 11 Melendy:

regional History Project, UCSC Library; Melendy, John; Knaster, Meri; Reti, Irene

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Silver City Grant County Airport (SVC) Pavement Condition and Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Silver City Grant County Airport (SVC) Pavement Condition and Analysis Submitted to: Jane M. Lucero ....................................1. Airport Conditions at Silver City Grant County Airport (SVC) 4 ..................................Figure 1. Geographic Location of Silver City Grant County Airport (SVC) 4 ......................Table 1

Cal, Mark P.

343

Bristol County, Rhode Island: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Bristol County is a county in Rhode Island. Its FIPS County Code is 001. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

344

A WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY POSTDOCTORAL POSITION FOR WORK AT LIGO HANFORD, WA Applications are invited for a postdoctoral position in the Gravity Group at the Department of Physics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY POSTDOCTORAL POSITION FOR WORK AT LIGO HANFORD, WA Applications characterization for the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO) at the Hanford site characterization at the LIGO Hanford observatory. Familiarity with data analysis pipelines for searching

Collins, Gary S.

345

Application of a modified denitrifying bacteria method for analyzing groundwater and vadose zone pore water nitrate at the Hanford Site, WA, USA.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

zone pore water nitrate at the Hanford Site, WA, USA. Woods,and Conrad, Mark The Hanford Site in southern WashingtonL have been reported for Hanford groundwaters, where nitrate

Woods, Katharine N.; Singleton, Michael J.; Conrad, Mark

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

A review of "Defining the Jacobean Church: the Politics of Religious Controversy, 1603-1625." by Charles W.A. Prior  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

REVIEWS 151 Charles W.A. Prior. Defining the Jacobean Church: the Politics of Religious Controversy, 1603-1625. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. xiv + 294 pp. $85.00. Review by GRAHAM PARRY, UNIVERSITY OF YORK. Defining the Jacobean...

Parry, Graham

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

Geothermal development issues: Recommendations to Deschutes County  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report discusses processes and issues related to geothermal development. It is intended to inform planners and interested individuals in Deschutes County about geothermal energy, and advise County officials as to steps that can be taken in anticipation of resource development. (ACR)

Gebhard, C.

1982-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Golden Valley County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 4.3% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 510.8 455.5 543.2 1 Community County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. Unintentional Injuries** 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Golden Valley County Secondary Data

Maxwell, Bruce D.

349

Lewis & Clark County Secondary Data Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Myocardial Infarction prevalence (Heart Attack) 3.3% 4.1% 6.0% All Sites Cancer 416.6 (Region 4) 455 of Death County1 Montana1,2 Nation2 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3. CLRD* 1. Cancer 2. Heart Disease 3.CLRD* 1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. CLRD* #12; Lewis & Clark County Secondary Data Analysis July

Maxwell, Bruce D.

350

Monroe County Extension Services Key West Office  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energy Services: 305-295-1010 Florida Keys Electric Co-op: 305-852-2431 Monroe County Roads & Bridges-292-4501 http://monroe.ifas.ufl.edu Key Largo Office: 102050 Overseas Highway, Room 244 City and County Tree Lower Keys: 305-797-4929 Upper Keys: 305-852-7161 Contact local tree services throughout the Keys

Jawitz, James W.

351

Public Health County of Santa Cruz  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Public Health Division County of Santa Cruz HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY POST OFFICE BOX 962, 1080 at the two Public Health clinics located at 1080 Emeline Ave. in Santa Cruz and at 9 Crestview Dr. in Watsonville, on a walk-in basis. County health clinic services are limited to those who reside in Santa Cruz

California at Santa Cruz, University of

352

Monroe County Extension Services Key West Office  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-292-4501 http://monroe.ifas.ufl.edu Key Largo Office: 102050 Overseas Highway, Room 244 City and County Tree Energy Services: 305-295-1010 Florida Keys Electric Co-op: 305-852-2431 Monroe County Roads & Bridges conditions based on USDA zone, water and light requirements, soil conditions, salt and wind tolerance

Florida, University of

353

EA-1852: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud County,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud 2: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud County, Kansas EA-1852: Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Project, Cloud County, Kansas Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to authorize the expenditure of federal funds by Cloud County Community College (CCCC) for a wind energy project. CCCC has installed three wind turbines and proposes to install a fourth turbine on their campus in Concordia, Kansas, for use in their wind energy training curriculum and to provide electricity for their campus. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download January 10, 2011 EA-1852: Notice of Scoping Cloud County Community College Wind Energy Technology Project, Cloud

354

Eagle County, Colorado Data Dashboard | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Data Dashboard Eagle County, Colorado Data Dashboard The data dashboard for Eagle County, Colorado, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program. bbnpbban0003798pmcd...

355

Eagle County, Colorado Summary of Reported Data | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Summary of Reported Data Eagle County, Colorado Summary of Reported Data Summary of data reported by Better Buildings Neighborhood Program partner Eagle County, Colorado. Eagle...

356

Vascular Flora of the Rocky Flats Area, Jefferson County, Colorado...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Vascular Flora of the Rocky Flats Area, Jefferson County, Colorado, USA Vascular Flora of the Rocky Flats Area, Jefferson County, Colorado, USA August 2010 Jody K. Nelson Vascular...

357

Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Elko County School District District Heating Low Temperature...

358

Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Pennsylvania Business Owner Fayette County, Pennsylvania, resident Geno Gallo started his green building business with ambitious goals. Unfortunately, the county's depressed...

359

EA-1611: Colorado Highlands Wind Project, Logan County, Colorado...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Project, Logan County, Colorado EA-1611: Colorado Highlands Wind Project, Logan County, Colorado SUMMARY DOE's Western Area Power Administration prepared an EA in 2009 to assess...

360

Ector County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Subtype B. Places in Ector County, Texas Gardendale, Texas Goldsmith, Texas Odessa, Texas West Odessa, Texas Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleEctorCounty,Te...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Amelia County, Virginia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Energy Generation Facilities in Amelia County, Virginia Scott Wood Biomass Facility Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleAmeliaCounty,...

362

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and San Mateo County...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and San Mateo County Transit District Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and San Mateo County Transit District Fuel Cell...

363

Shannon County, Missouri: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Shannon County, Missouri Birch Tree, Missouri Eminence, Missouri Summersville, Missouri Winona, Missouri Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleShannonCounty,Miss...

364

National Association of Counties Webinar - Combined Heat and...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Association of Counties Webinar - Combined Heat and Power: Resiliency Strategies for Critical Facilities National Association of Counties Webinar - Combined Heat and Power:...

365

Enterprise Center of Johnson County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Enterprise Center of Johnson County Jump to: navigation, search Name: Enterprise Center of Johnson County Place: United States Sector: Services Product: General Financial & Legal...

366

EECBG Success Story: A Michigan County Unearths Savings with...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy EECBG Success Story: A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy January 22, 2013 - 1:20pm Addthis Kent...

367

Miami-Dade County - Voluntary Energy Efficiency and Renewable...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Miami-Dade County - Voluntary Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program (Florida) Miami-Dade County - Voluntary Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program (Florida) < Back...

368

Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Cuts Emissions, Promotes Green...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Emissions, Promotes Green Growth Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Cuts Emissions, Promotes Green Growth February 23, 2012 - 6:29pm Addthis The Forest County Potawatomi Tribe's solar...

369

Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals Photo of an energy-efficient home with modern...

370

Fayette County, Pennsylvania Data Dashboard | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Data Dashboard Fayette County, Pennsylvania Data Dashboard The data dashboard for Fayette County, Pennsylvania, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program....

371

Evaluation of public engagement in the Yolo County budget process.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The County Administrator???s Office of Yolo County continues to seek new opportunities to improve processes for operational improvement. In recent years, many local governments have (more)

Williams, Lyndsey Kathleen

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Stochastic Conjunctive Management of Water Resources in Yolo County  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

87-103. Jenkins, M . 1992. Yolo County, California's watercomponents experienced in Yolo County in the managementdevelopment of a model for Yolo Basin, California so as to

Basagaoglu, Hakan; Marino, Miguel A; Shumway, Robert H

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Crawford County, Michigan: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

6 Climate Zone Subtype A. Energy Generation Facilities in Crawford County, Michigan Grayling Generating Station Biomass Facility Places in Crawford County, Michigan Grayling,...

374

Better Buildings: Workforce: Spotlight on Fayette County, Pennsylvania...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

County, Pennsylvania: Developing the Skills and Tools for Workforce Success Better Buildings: Workforce: Spotlight on Fayette County, Pennsylvania: Developing the Skills and...

375

Dane County Landfill | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Dane County Landfill Dane County Landfill Jump to: navigation, search Name Dane County Landfill Facility Dane County Landfill #2 Rodefeld Sector Biomass Facility Type Landfill Gas Location Dane County, Wisconsin Coordinates 43.0186073°, -89.5497632° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.0186073,"lon":-89.5497632,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

376

Imperial County geothermal development annual meeting: summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

All phases of current geothermal development in Imperial County are discussed and future plans for development are reviewed. Topics covered include: Heber status update, Heber binary project, direct geothermal use for high-fructose corn sweetener production, update on county planning activities, Brawley and Salton Sea facility status, status of Imperial County projects, status of South Brawley Prospect 1983, Niland geothermal energy program, recent and pending changes in federal procedures/organizations, plant indicators of geothermal fluid on East Mesa, state lands activities in Imperial County, environmental interests in Imperial County, offshore exploration, strategic metals in geothermal fluids rebuilding of East Mesa Power Plant, direct use geothermal potential for Calipatria industrial Park, the Audubon Society case, status report of the Cerro Prieto geothermal field, East Brawley Prospect, and precision gravity survey at Heber and Cerro Prieto geothermal fields. (MHR)

Not Available

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Environmental assessment: Deaf Smith County site, Texas  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In February 1983, the US Department of Energy (DOE) identified a location in Deaf Smith County, Texas, as one of nine potentially acceptable sites for a mined geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. To determine their suitability, the Deaf Smith County site and the eight other potentially sites have been evaluated in accordance with the DOE's General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for the Nuclear Waste Repositories. The Deaf Smith County site is in the Permian Basin, which is one of five distinct geohydrologic settings considered for the first repository. On the basis of the evaluations reported in this EA, the DOE has found that the Deaf Smith County site is not disqualified under the guidelines. On the basis of these findings, the DOE is nominating the Deaf Smith County site as one of the five sites suitable for characterization. 591 refs., 147 figs., 173 tabs.

Not Available

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County August 3, 2010 - 12:32pm Addthis The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County Joshua DeLung What are the key facts? $2.2 million Recovery Act grant awarded to Kane County, Illinios. $150,000 estimated annual savings from retrofits at county buildings 424,000 square feet of building to be retrofitted West of Chicago, one Illinois municipality is putting its $2.2 million

379

Category:County Climate Zones | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Climate Zones County Climate Zones Jump to: navigation, search This category contains county climate zone information in the United States of America. Contents: Top - 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Pages in category "County Climate Zones" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 3,141 total. (previous 200) (next 200) A Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Acadia Parish, Louisiana ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Ada County, Idaho ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Iowa ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Adair County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone

380

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County One Grant, Nine Energy Efficiency Programs for Illinois County August 3, 2010 - 12:32pm Addthis The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County The Kane County Judicial Center is one building that received retrofits to save the county energy with a Recovery Act-funded block grant. | Photo courtesy of Kane County Joshua DeLung What are the key facts? $2.2 million Recovery Act grant awarded to Kane County, Illinios. $150,000 estimated annual savings from retrofits at county buildings 424,000 square feet of building to be retrofitted West of Chicago, one Illinois municipality is putting its $2.2 million

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

neighborhoods in Seattle/King County, WA (chil- dren, teens,a X CA and Seattle/ Nutrition King County, WA Environmentb Seattle/King County, WA and Baltimore, MD-DC Seattle/King

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

Preventive Care for Children in the United States: Quality and Barriers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

aged 1418 years in King County, WA Yu et al. 2002 Klein etaged 1418 years in King County, WA 302 randomly selectedaged 1418 years in King County, WA Chart review, 1998

Chung, Paul J.; Lee, Tim C.; Morrison, Janina L.; Schuster, Mark A.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF MALE WHITE-TAILED DEER IN THE CROSSTIMBERS AND PRAIRIES ECOREGION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Holtfreter and Judyth A. Holtfreter and was raised in Hays, Kansas and Yakima, WA. Upon graduation from West Valley High School in 2000, he attended Washington State University from 2000 to 2005 when he graduated

Ditchkoff, Steve

384

Santa Barbara County, California Summary of Reported Data  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary of data reported by Better Buildings Neighborhood Program partner Santa Barbara County, California.

385

Lafayette County, Florida: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Mayo, Florida Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleLafayetteCounty,Florida&oldid29513...

386

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fayette County Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County Training Makes All the Difference for Pennsylvania Business Owner on Digg

387

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Santa Barbara Santa Barbara County, California to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA

388

Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Efficiency  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Appliances & Electronics Construction Design & Remodeling Sealing Your Home Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Heat Pumps Commercial Lighting Lighting Water Heating Program Info State Iowa Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Varies by technology Provider Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative Association Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative Association (Linn County RECA) is a member-owned cooperative. To encourage energy efficiency, Linn County

389

Clark County - Energy Conservation Code | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Clark County - Energy Conservation Code Clark County - Energy Conservation Code Clark County - Energy Conservation Code < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Nevada Program Type Building Energy Code Provider Clark County In September 2010, Clark County adopted Ordinance 3897, implementing the Southern Nevada version of the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code for both residential and commercial buildings located within Clark County. The code was developed by the Southern Nevada Building Officials' International Energy Conservation Committee, comprised of seven municipalities throughout Nevada (including Clark County, Las Vegas, North

390

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades September 30, 2010 - 12:04pm Addthis A new energy management system in Forsyth County’s 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County A new energy management system in Forsyth County's 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County Maya Payne Smart Former Writer for Energy Empowers, EERE What are the key facts? Four large projects funded through Recovery Act grant Energy efficient retrofits to save county about $72,000 annually Forsyth County, Georgia has been among the nation's fastest growing counties for the past ten years. Given the growth, officials are working

391

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades Forsyth County Slashes Energy Bills with Upgrades September 30, 2010 - 12:04pm Addthis A new energy management system in Forsyth County’s 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County A new energy management system in Forsyth County's 52,057 square foot courthouse is expected to save about $9,000 annually. | Photo courtesy of Forsyth County Maya Payne Smart Former Writer for Energy Empowers, EERE What are the key facts? Four large projects funded through Recovery Act grant Energy efficient retrofits to save county about $72,000 annually Forsyth County, Georgia has been among the nation's fastest growing counties for the past ten years. Given the growth, officials are working

392

Decommissioning samples from the Ft. Lewis, WA, solvent refined coal pilot plant: chemical analysis and biological testing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from chemical analyses and limited biological assays of three sets of samples from the Ft. Lewis, WA solvent refined coal (SRC) pilot plant. The samples were collected during the process of decommissioning this facility. Chemical composition was determined for chemical class fractions of the samples by using high-resolution gas chromatography (GC), high-resolution GC/mass spectrometry (MS) and high-resolution MS. Biological activity was measuring using both the histidine reversion microbial mutagenicity assay with Salmonella typhimurium, TA98 and an initiation/promotion mouse-skin tumorigenicity assay. 19 refs., 7 figs., 27 tabs.

Weimer, W.C.; Wright, C.W.

1985-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

YOLO COUNTY SERVICES GUIDE The Yolo County Services Guide is a new resource to help residents access various  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

YOLO COUNTY SERVICES GUIDE The Yolo County Services Guide is a new resource to help residents by the Yolo County Health Department and the Yolo Family Resource Center, a nonprofit organization again anywhere in the document. #12;SERVICES / RESOURCES PROVIDED BY YOLO COUNTY & OTHER AGENCIES

Nguyen, Danh

394

Story County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Wind Farm County Wind Farm Facility Story County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Location Story and Hardin Counties IA Coordinates 42.301351°, -93.45156° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.301351,"lon":-93.45156,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

395

Recipient: County of San Bernadino,CA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Recipient: County of San Bernadino,CA Recipient: County of San Bernadino,CA Award #: EE 000 0903 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plan Environmental Impact Report (EECS) A9, All None - this NEPA determination is for the report only. Solar Electric System for Rancho Cucamonga County Office Building A9, All Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause **This NEPA determination is limited to a roof-mounted system only. County Heating Ventilation and Air-Condition (HVAC) Retrofit Program B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering clause Solar Electric System for High Desert Government Center

396

Fannin County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Fannin County Electric Coop Fannin County Electric Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Fannin County Electric Coop Place Texas Utility Id 6173 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location TRE NERC ERCOT Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Residential Residential Security Lighting-175 Watt Mercury Vapor Lighting Small Commercial Commercial Average Rates Residential: $0.1210/kWh Commercial: $0.1010/kWh Industrial: $0.1320/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Fannin_County_Electric_Coop&oldid=410679

397

Montgomery County to the Rescue! - Presentation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Montgomery County to the Rescue! Montgomery County to the Rescue! Summary Scenario Student Pages Index of Projects Subject: Investigating Ethnic/Cultural Diversity in the Community Grade Level: 2 Abstract: The hometown of the Power Rangers, popular TV and movie action characters, has been destroyed by evil forces. The Rangers post an Internet plea for help in locating a new home base that is ethnically and culturally diverse. In order to convince the Rangers to adopt Montgomery County as their new home base, students must find out specific facts about different ethnic and cultural groups in the community, and present these facts in a persuasive case to the Rangers. Students use the Internet and e-mail to obtain current facts about Montgomery County, and send their invitation back to the Rangers.

398

Los Alamos County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alamos County Alamos County Place New Mexico Utility Id 11204 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes Activity Bundled Services Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] Energy Information Administration Form 826[2] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Area Lighting Service - Metered Commercial TOU Lighting Area Lighting Service - Metered County TOU Lighting Area Lighting Service - Metered Large Commercial Lighting Area Lighting Service - Metered Large County Lighting

399

Environmental assessment, Deaf Smith County site, Texas  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 USC sections 10101-10226) requires the environmental assessment of a proposed site to include a statement of the basis for nominating a site as suitable for characterization. Volume 2 provides a detailed statement evaluating the site suitability of the Deaf Smith County Site under DOE siting guidelines, as well as a comparison of the Deaf Smith County Site to the other sites under consideration. The evaluation of the Deaf Smith County Site is based on the impacts associated with the reference repository design, but the evaluation will not change if based on the Mission Plan repository concept. The second part of this document compares the Deaf Smith County Site to Davis Canyon, Hanford, Richton Dome and Yucca Mountain. This comparison is required under DOE guidelines and is not intended to directly support subsequent recommendation of three sites for characterization as candidate sites. 259 refs., 29 figs., 66 refs. (MHB)

Not Available

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Environmental assessment: Deaf Smith County site, Texas  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In February 1983, the US Department of Energy (DOE) identified a location in Deaf Smith County, Texas, as one of the nine potentially acceptable sites for mined geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. To determine their suitability, the Deaf Smith County site and eight other potentially acceptable sites have been evaluated in accordance with the DOE's General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for the Nuclear Waste Repositories. The Deaf Smith County site is in the Permian Basin, which is one of five distinct geohydrologic settings considered for the first repository. On the basis of the evaluations reported in this EA, the DOE has found that the Deaf Smith County site is not disqualified under the guidelines.

Not Available

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

The Vanishing Present Counties of Wisconsin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Vanishing Present #12;Counties of Wisconsin 92¡ 90¡ 88¡ 47¡ 45¡ 43¡ LakeMichigan Lake Superior LINCOLN MARINETTE PRICE FOREST ONEIDA FLORENCE VILAS TAYLOR CHIPPEWA RUSK SAWYER DUNN BARRON POLK BURNETT

Waller, Donald M.

402

Public Utility District #1 Of Jefferson County  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Of Jefferson County Board of Commissioners July 2,2008 Dana Roberts, District 1 M. Kelly Hays, District 2 Wayne G. King, District 3 Mark Gendron, Vice President Northwest...

403

Western Baldwin County, AL Grid Interconnection Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Objective of this Project was to provide an additional supply of electricity to the affected portions of Baldwin County, AL through the purchase, installation, and operation of certain substation equipment.

Thomas DeBell

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

404

HENDRY COUNTY CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION YOUTH RANCH RODEO  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

HENDRY COUNTY CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION YOUTH RANCH RODEO February 26, 2012 LaBelle Rodeo Grounds a meeting at 1:00pm prior to rodeo. 3. Arena dress code will be enforced. All contestants must wear cowboy

Watson, Craig A.

405

Marin County- Wood Stove Replacement Rebate Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The County of Marin has created a rebate program to encourage homeowners to remove or replace non-EPA certified wood-burning heaters (wood stoves and fireplace inserts) with cleaner burning stoves...

406

Klamath and Lake Counties Agricultural Industrial Park  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Engineered Geothermal Systems, Low Temp, Exploration Demonstration Projects. Project goal: to attract new businesses to Klamath and Lake counties for the purpose of capitalizing on our abundant geothermal resources.

407

Winona County Wind | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Winona County Wind Winona County Wind Jump to: navigation, search Name Winona County Wind Facility Winona County Wind Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Juhl Wind Developer Juhl Wind Energy Purchaser NSP/Xcel Energy Location 3 miles northwest of Altura MN Coordinates 44.101281°, -91.975715° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.101281,"lon":-91.975715,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

408

County Solid Waste Control Act (Texas)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of this chapter is to authorize a cooperative effort by counties, public agencies, and other persons for the safe and economical collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste...

409

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 17, 2009 July 17, 2009 EIS-0424: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Klickitat Hatchery Program, Klickitat and Yakima Counties, WA July 1, 2009 EA-1660: Final Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington April 21, 2009 EIS-0419: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Whistling Ridge Energy Project in Skamania County, Washington. March 12, 2009 State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire Letter from Washington Governor Gregoire providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so that Recovery Act funds can be made available. These assurances are required by Section 410 of the American Recovery and

410

Texas County Fairs: A Report of Survey Results.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and to provide an evaluation tool for fair managers. METHODOLOGY An official list of county fair representatives to receive the survey was developed through assistance from the Texas Association of Fairs and Expositions (TAFE) and county administrators... 76571 1 County een J-C's Fair , ~ John R. Cowsert P. O. Box 878 Killeen, Texas 76541 APPENDIX II FESTIVALS, FAIRS AND EVENTS IN TEXAS* Listed by County in Alphabetical Order Bexar County Fiesta San Antonio c/o Davis Burnett, Jr. 306 N. Presa...

Watt, Carson E.; Wicks, Bruce E.

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

SOLAR PANELS ON HUDSON COUNTY FACILITIES  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project involved the installation of an 83 kW grid-connected photovoltaic system tied into the energy management system of Hudson County's new 60,000 square foot Emergency Operations and Command Center and staff offices. Other renewable energy features of the building include a 15 kW wind turbine, geothermal heating and cooling, natural daylighting, natural ventilation, gray water plumbing system and a green roof. The County intends to seek Silver LEED certification for the facility.

BARRY, KEVIN

2014-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

412

Salt Lake County Residential Solar Financing Study  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

As part of our engagement with the National Renewable Energy Laboratories conducting the Salt Lake County Solar America Residential Finance Study, we have drafted this report summarizing the tools and mechanisms available for residential solar projects. These include the financial incentives available, possible financing models that could be used in the County, and a review of the community-scale solar project in St. George, Utah. We have also provided cost estimates for each system.

413

Water Conservation Study for Manastash Creek Water Users, Kittias County, Washington, Final Report 2002.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Manastash Creek is tributary of the Yakima River and is located southwest and across the Yakima River from the City of Ellensburg. The creek drains mountainous terrain that ranges in elevation from 2,000 feet to over 5,500 feet and is primarily snowmelt fed, with largest flows occurring in spring and early summer. The creek flows through a narrow canyon until reaching a large, open plain that slopes gently toward the Yakima River and enters the main stem of the Yakima River at river mile 154.5. This area, formed by the alluvial fan of the Creek as it leaves the canyon, is the subject of this study. The area is presently dominated by irrigated agriculture, but development pressures are evident as Ellensburg grows and develops as an urban center. Since the mid to late nineteenth century when irrigated agriculture was established in a significant manner in the Yakima River Basin, Manastash Creek has been used to supply irrigation water for farming in the area. Adjudicated water rights dating back to 1871 for 4,465 acres adjacent to Manastash Creek allow appropriation of up to 26,273 acre-feet of creek water for agricultural irrigation and stock water. The diversion of water from Manastash Creek for irrigation has created two main problems for fisheries. They are low flows or dewatered reaches of Manastash Creek and fish passage barriers at the irrigation diversion dams. The primary goal of this study, as expressed by Yakama Nation and BPA, is to reestablish safe access in tributaries of the Yakima River by removing physical barriers and unscreened diversions and by adding instream flow where needed for fisheries. The goal expressed by irrigators who would be affected by these projects is to support sustainable and profitable agricultural use of land that currently uses Manastash Creek water for irrigation. This study provides preliminary costs and recommendations for a range of alternative projects that will partially or fully meet the goal of establishing safe access for fisheries in Manastash Creek by reducing or eliminating diversions and eliminating fish passage barriers. Further study and design will be necessary to more fully develop the alternatives, evaluate their environmental benefits and impacts and determine the effect on Manastash Creek water users. Those studies will be needed to determine which alternative has the best combination of benefits and costs, and meets the goal of the Manastash Creek water users.

Montgomery Watson Harza (Firm)

2002-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

414

Geothermal development plan: Maricopa County  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Maricopa County Geothermal Development Plan evaluated the market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified six potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 100{sup 0}C (212{sup 0}F) and in addition, four suspected intermediate temperature areas (90{sup 0} to 150{sup 0}C, 194{sup 0} to 300{sup 0}F). Geothermal resources are found to occur in and near the Phoenix metropolitan area where average population growth rates of two to three percent per year are expected over the next 40 years. Rapid growth in the manufacturing, trade and service sectors of the regional economy provides opportunities for the direct utilization of geothermal energy. A regional energy use analysis is included containing energy use and price projections. Water supplies are found to be adequate to support this growth, though agricultural water use is expected to diminish. The study also contains a detailed section matching geothermal resources to potential users. Two comparative analyses providing economic details for space heating projects are incorporated.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Studies on cercariae in Brazos County, Texas  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

?ith ?wt? Wtorgal ?n4il 4bsir ciao ~ syyrcaci wtw that of the too oegawi The eeooadgry bgsaohw sad ths ?oriocw 4?boles wro ?ct wyyed) boeergr, wc' fleas ?olla, tbcg)r eorrwyosdiag Wd S foe tcdCetW bW? bWa ill?etgatsd ia rid N). Tbs )fats...?ed~ the plwteriar border of el@oh ia boles the insertion of tho intestinal ense. The latter rua pcoteriad and ond assr the on~tesal sargia ef tho enorstcry vesicle& ~ posterior chaaber, The contents of these crore often hsvo a hnct+ appearance& Thoro are so...

Dunagan, Tommy Tolson

1955-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

E-Print Network 3.0 - area churchill county Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

County Yvonne Erickson, Lincoln County Stuart Ramsing, ... Source: Collection: Renewable Energy 80 THE ECONOMY OF MANATEE AND SARASOTA COUNTIES Effie Philippakos Summary:...

417

BlueLincs HMO Service Area Sorted by County To receive services, you  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

73570 Wagoner County Washington County Ochelata 74051 Ramona 74061 Vera 74082 Washita County Burns Flat 73624 Canute 73626 Dill City 73641 Foss 73647 Rocky 73661 Sentinel 73664 #12;

Oklahoma, University of

418

The Impacts of Alternative Patterns of Urbanization on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in an Agricultural County  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

www.yolocounty.org/Index. aspx? page=1965. Yolo County.2011. Yolo County Climate Action Plan. Woodland, CA.for Agricultural Sustainability in Yolo County, California.

Wheeler, Stephen

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

Beginnings of geothermal impact on county population and leadership, Imperial County, California  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A major geothermal energy development scenario is about to begin in Imperial County. Initial energy-socioeconomic interactions in the areas of population and county leadership structure are discussed. These include immigration of energy company workers, a sewage plant dispute, conflict over union affiliation of geothermal laborers, and a transmission corridor routing dispute.

Pick, J.B.; Butler, E.W.

1980-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NRG W.A. PARISH PCCS PROJECT NRG W.A. PARISH PCCS PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX H. BEG MODELING REPORT APPENDIX H BEG MODELING REPORT DOE/EIS-0473 NRG W.A. PARISH PCCS PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX H. BEG MODELING REPORT INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 Reservoir modeling and simulation for estimating migration extents of injectate-CO 2 in support of West Ranch oilfield NEPA/EIS Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin May 4, 2012 Summary It is anticipated that anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2-A) will be injected into the deep (5,000-6,000 ft below sea level) subsurface for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) at the West Ranch oilfield beginning in early 2015. The purpose of this report is to present reservoir modeling and simulation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Category:Eagle County, CO | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eagle County, CO Eagle County, CO Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Eagle County, CO" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total. SVFullServiceRestaurant Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVFullServiceRestauran... 63 KB SVMidriseApartment Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVMidriseApartment Eag... 67 KB SVQuickServiceRestaurant Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVQuickServiceRestaura... 63 KB SVSecondarySchool Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVSecondarySchool Eagl... 68 KB SVStandAloneRetail Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVStandAloneRetail Eag... 67 KB SVHospital Eagle County CO Public Service Co of Colorado.png SVHospital Eagle Count...

422

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy January 22, 2013 - 9:55am Addthis Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Christina Stowers Communications Specialist in the Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program What are the key facts? Kent County Correctional Facility installed a 96-well geothermal system to help reduce its energy consumption. The new heating and cooling system is expected to save the county an

423

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy A Michigan County Unearths Savings with Geothermal Energy January 22, 2013 - 9:55am Addthis Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Kent County Correctional Facility is saving energy and money with a new closed-loop geothermal system. | Photo courtesy of Kent County Administrator's Office. Christina Stowers Communications Specialist in the Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program What are the key facts? Kent County Correctional Facility installed a 96-well geothermal system to help reduce its energy consumption. The new heating and cooling system is expected to save the county an

424

St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program St. Louis County - Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Cooling Sealing Your Home Design & Remodeling Windows, Doors, & Skylights Ventilation Manufacturing Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Insulation Water Heating Maximum Rebate $15,000 Program Info Funding Source St. Louis County State Missouri Program Type Local Loan Program Rebate Amount $2,500-$15,000 Provider St. Louis County St. Louis County SAVES offers loans to residents for energy efficiency improvements in owner-occupied, single-family homes. Loans are available

425

San Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement San Bernardino County - Green Building Requirement < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings In August 2007, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors approved a policy requiring that all new county buildings and major renovations be built to LEED Silver standards. The decision was part of the Green County San Bernardino project, which also includes incentives to encourage residents, builders, and businesses to adopt more sustainable practices. Source http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=CA73R

426

Gray County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Gray County Wind Farm Gray County Wind Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Gray County Wind Farm Facility Gray County Wind Farm Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Aquila Location Gray County KS Coordinates 37.5855°, -100.384° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.5855,"lon":-100.384,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

427

Microsoft Word - CX-CircuitBreakerReplacementsMultipleSubstationsFY12_WEB.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12, 2012 12, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Michael Gilchrist Project Manager - TEP-TPP-1 Proposed Action: Power Circuit Breaker Replacement Project Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): Appendix B4.6, Additions and modifications to transmission facilities. Location: Tumwater, Thurston County, WA; Ravensdale, King County, WA; Silver Creek, Lewis County, WA; Shelton, Mason County, WA; Bremerton, Kitsap County, WA; Bandon, Coos County, OR; Toledo, Lincoln County, OR; Wilsonville, Washington County, OR; Gold Beach, Curry County, OR; Stayton, Marion County, OR; Swan Valley, Bonneville County, ID; Moose, Teton County, WY (ID); Gold Creek, Powell County, MT.

428

Quad County Corn Processors | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Quad County Corn Processors Quad County Corn Processors Jump to: navigation, search Name Quad County Corn Processors Place Galva, Iowa Zip 51020 Product Farmer owned corn processing facility management company. Coordinates 38.38422°, -97.537539° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.38422,"lon":-97.537539,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

429

Brown County Wind | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Brown County Wind Brown County Wind Facility Brown County Wind Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Adams Electric Cooperative Developer Adams Electric Cooperative Energy Purchaser Adams Electric Cooperative Location Mt. Sterling IL Coordinates 39.97340387°, -90.69939137° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.97340387,"lon":-90.69939137,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

430

Northern Wasco County PUD | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County PUD County PUD Jump to: navigation, search Name Northern Wasco County PUD Place Oregon Utility Id 13788 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png COMMERCIAL DEMAND RATE - Schedule 250 Commercial COMMERCIAL PRIMARY SERVICE - Schedule 300 Commercial Commercial Commercial Residential Residential Average Rates Residential: $0.0581/kWh

431

Lincoln County Wind Farms | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Name Lincoln County Wind Farms Facility Lincoln County Wind Farms Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Jay Gislason Developer Diversified Energy Solutions Energy Purchaser Otter Tail Power Location Lincoln County MN Coordinates 44.4039°, -96.2646° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.4039,"lon":-96.2646,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

432

Dunn County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Dunn County Electric Coop Dunn County Electric Coop Place Wisconsin Utility Id 5417 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location MRO NERC RFC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Dusk/Dawn Lighting HPS 100 W Lighting Industrial Industrial Residential Residential Average Rates Residential: $0.1210/kWh Commercial: $0.1030/kWh Industrial: $0.0716/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Dunn_County_Electric_Coop&oldid=410605" Categories: EIA Utility Companies and Aliases

433

Yuba County Water Agency | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yuba County Water Agency Yuba County Water Agency Place California Utility Id 21140 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC WECC Yes ISO CA Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates No Rates Available References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Yuba_County_Water_Agency&oldid=412223" Categories: EIA Utility Companies and Aliases Utility Companies Organizations

434

Solano County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Farm Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Solano County Wind Farm Facility Solano County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Developer Kenetech Windpower Energy Purchaser Pacific Gas & Electric Co Location Solano County CA Coordinates 38.1535°, -121.858° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.1535,"lon":-121.858,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

435

Franklin County Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Franklin County Wind Project Franklin County Wind Project Facility Franklin County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Coordinates 37.014702°, -79.895096° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.014702,"lon":-79.895096,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

436

Crisp County Power Comm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Crisp County Power Comm Crisp County Power Comm Jump to: navigation, search Name Crisp County Power Comm Place Georgia Utility Id 4538 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Retail Marketing Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Agriculture Process Service Commercial Farm Service Commercial Fuel Cost Recovery Schedule- Primary Distribution Commercial Fuel Cost Recovery Schedule- Secondary Distribution Commercial Fuel Cost Recovery Schedule- Transmission Commercial

437

Ralls County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Electric Coop County Electric Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Ralls County Electric Coop Place Missouri Utility Id 15672 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Dual Fuel General Service Large - Over 300 kW Geothermal Heat Pump Large Power (100 kW to 300 kW) Security Light Lighting Single Phase Under 100 kW Three Phase Under 100 kW Average Rates Residential: $0.1240/kWh Commercial: $0.1060/kWh Industrial: $0.0596/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a"

438

Mississippi County Electric Coop | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Electric Coop County Electric Coop Jump to: navigation, search Name Mississippi County Electric Coop Place Arkansas Utility Id 12681 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] Energy Information Administration Form 826[2] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Load Control of Irrigation Service I - Alternate Commercial Load Control of Irrigation Service II - Alternate Commercial Rate # 11-- Industrial Power Service Industrial Rate #1- Single Service Residential Rate #2- Three Phase Service Under 50 kW Commercial Rate #3- Large Commercial Service Commercial

439

Appling County Pellets | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Appling County Pellets Appling County Pellets Jump to: navigation, search Name Appling County Pellets Place Graham, Georgia Zip 31513 Sector Biomass Product Producer of wood pellets and other biomass products located in Georgia. Coordinates 47.055765°, -122.294774° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.055765,"lon":-122.294774,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

440

Dutchess County Resource Recovery Task Force report: Dutchess County Pyrolysis Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Dutchess County initiated development of a long-range master plan for Solid Waste Management in 1971. The plan included development of a resource recovery facility to service the municipalities in the County population center. Based on early recommendations, a pyrolysis facility employing Purox technology was to be implemented. A feasibility study, paid for by County funds was completed in 1975. The study provided siting recommendations, estimation of available waste, and preliminary facility design. Because of various considerations, the project was not developed. Under the Department of Energy grant, the County reassessed the feasibility of a resource recovery facility, with emphasis on confirming previous conclusions supporting the Purox technology, waste availability, energy recovery and sale and siting of the plant. The conclusions reached in the new study were: a resource recovery facility is feasible for the County; sufficient waste for such a facility is available and subject to control; While Purox technology was feasible it is not the most appropriate available technoloy for the County; that mass burning with steam recovery is the most appropriate technology; and that resource recovery while presently more expensive than landfilling, represents the only cost effective, energy efficient, and environmentally sound way to handle the solid waste problem in the County.

None

1980-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Analyzing the organizational culture of Yolo county using two assessment models.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Commissioned by Yolo Countys Administrative Officer, the purpose of this thesis is to advance Yolo Countys efforts to be a learning organization that is able (more)

Fox, Jason Robert

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Energy Efficient Buildings, Salt Lake County, Utah  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Executive Summary Salt Lake County's Solar Photovoltaic Project - an unprecedented public/private partnership Salt Lake County is pleased to announce the completion of its unprecedented solar photovoltaic (PV) installation on the Calvin R. Rampton Salt Palace Convention Center. This 1.65 MW installation will be one the largest solar roof top installations in the country and will more than double the current installed solar capacity in the state of Utah. Construction is complete and the system will be operational in May 2012. The County has accomplished this project using a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) financing model. In a PPA model a third-party solar developer will finance, develop, own, operate, and maintain the solar array. Salt Lake County will lease its roof, and purchase the power from this third-party under a long-term Power Purchase Agreement contract. In fact, this will be one of the first projects in the state of Utah to take advantage of the recent (March 2010) legislation which makes PPA models possible for projects of this type. In addition to utilizing a PPA, this solar project will employ public and private capital, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECBG), and public/private subsidized bonds that are able to work together efficiently because of the recent stimulus bill. The project also makes use of recent changes to federal tax rules, and the recent re-awakening of private capital markets that make a significant public-private partnership possible. This is an extremely innovative project, and will mark the first time that all of these incentives (EECBG grants, Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds, New Markets tax credits, investment tax credits, public and private funds) have been packaged into one project. All of Salt Lake County's research documents and studies, agreements, and technical information is available to the public. In addition, the County has already shared a variety of information with the public through webinars, site tours, presentations, and written correspondence.

Barnett, Kimberly

2012-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

443

Clyde Thurman of Monroe County, Tennessee, and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Clyde Thurman of Monroe County, Tennessee, and Clyde Thurman of Monroe County, Tennessee, and his 76 acres of switchgrass. Thurman was among the first farmers to grow switchgrass as part of the University of Tennessee Biofuels Initiative. (Photo: Ken Goddard, UT Extension) a BIOENERGY ecosystem ecosystem." "We are working with the biotech firm Ceres to develop more efficient feedstocks based on our science. Once regu- latory hurdles are satisfied, we can see a day where Ceres will in turn work with Genera, a University of Tennessee bioenergy spinoff company, to grow those feedstocks with the cooperation of a consortium of Tennessee

444

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use Software Helps Kentucky County Gauge Energy Use July 27, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis How does it work? Software tracks energy usage, greenhouse gas levels and analyzes utility bills. County could see savings and cost recoveries of $100,000 to $200,000. Information allows county to make energy usage changes and identify retrofit needs. For county officials conscious of energy efficiency, deciphering complex utility bills and identifying both municipal energy-use trends and potential savings opportunities can be complex without sophisticated software. "We knew we needed a better system," says James Bush, energy manager for Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky. Last month, the county invested $140,000 of a $2.7 million Energy

445

Solar Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds Solar Projects Provide Energy to County Fairgrounds September 23, 2010 - 1:01pm Addthis Solar panels have been installed at a shelter facility near Ulster County Fairgrounds. | Photo courtesy of Ulster County Solar panels have been installed at a shelter facility near Ulster County Fairgrounds. | Photo courtesy of Ulster County Kevin Craft What are the key facts? This project is expected to save local taxpayers $4,000 a year. All supplies and labor came from local, private contractors. Fairs, food festivals -- and solar panels. Every year, thousands of people attend events at the Ulster County Fairgrounds in New York State. This year visitors to the fairgrounds will get a first-hand look at two solar energy installations that are saving

446

Final Environmental Assessment, Burleigh County Wind Energy Center  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1542 August 2005 Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Burleigh County Wind Energy Center Burleigh County, North Dakota Final Burleigh County Wind, LLC BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE Central Power Electric Cooperative, Inc. Introduction 1-1 Burleigh County Wind Energy Center Environmental Assessment CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Burleigh County Wind Energy Center is a wind generation project proposed by FPL Energy Burleigh County Wind, LLC (Burleigh County Wind). The proposed project would produce up to 50 megawatts (MW) of electricity, averaged annually. The proposed project is located in Burleigh County, North Dakota, approximately 3 miles south and 2 miles east of the town of Wilton, North Dakota (Figures 1-1

447

EIS-0455: Genesis Solar Energy Project in Riverside County, CA...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: Genesis Solar Energy Project in Riverside County, CA EIS-0455: Genesis Solar Energy Project in Riverside County, CA December 17, 2010 EIS-0455: Notice of Adoption of an...

448

Jasper County Rural E M C | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Rural E M C Jump to: navigation, search Name: Jasper County Rural E M C Place: Indiana References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1a1 EIA Form 861 Data...

449

EIS-0439: Rice Solar Energy Project in Riverside County, CA ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9: Rice Solar Energy Project in Riverside County, CA EIS-0439: Rice Solar Energy Project in Riverside County, CA March 29, 2010 EIS-0439: Notice of Intent to Prepare an...

450

Gvleborg County, Sweden: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Gvleborg County is a county in Sweden. References Geonames Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleGvle...

451

Boulder County Summary of Reported Data | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Summary of Reported Data Boulder County Summary of Reported Data Summary of Reported Data for Boulder County, a partner in the U.S. Department of Energy's Better Buildings...

452

Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Center for Hydrogen Research County Center for Hydrogen Research Jump to: navigation, search Name Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research Place South Carolina Zip 29803 Sector Hydro, Hydrogen Product Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Reseach will launch its activities in 2005, involving with industrial and academic stakeholders. References Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research is a company located in South Carolina . References ↑ "Aiken County Center for Hydrogen Research" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Aiken_County_Center_for_Hydrogen_Research&oldid=341931"

453

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals to someone by E-mail County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County's Green Idea House Achieves Efficient Goals on

454

Navarro County Elec Coop, Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Navarro County Elec Coop, Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name: Navarro County Elec Coop, Inc Place: Texas References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1a1 EIA...

455

E-Print Network 3.0 - allegheny county pennsylvania Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Allegheny County... comprises seven counties in Southwestern Pennsylvania (Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette... ... Source: Sibille, Etienne - Center for the Neural...

456

Corinna Cisneros, S.M. Golam Mortuza, and Soumik Banerjee School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163 Organic Photovoltaic Solar Cells: A Molecular of fossil fuel resources has lead to global energy crisis with an increasing effort in the scientific community to develop renewable energy technologies. Solar cell technology has generated significant

Collins, Gary S.

457

Proc. of the ACM Int'l. Symp on Softw. Testing and Analysis, Seattle, WA, August 1994, pages 169184. Selecting Tests and Identifying Test Coverage Requirements for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of structural coverage crite­ ria. Our technique partitions an existing test suite into two subsets: testsProc. of the ACM Int'l. Symp on Softw. Testing and Analysis, Seattle, WA, August 1994, pages 169­184. Selecting Tests and Identifying Test Coverage Requirements for Modified Software* Gregg Rothermel and Mary

Rothermel, Gregg

458

PECIAL REPORS T Public Health: Seattle and King County's  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PECIAL REPORS T Public Health: Seattle and King County's Push for the Built Environment Introduction In Seattle and King County, Washington, and nationwide, evidence shows that decisions about how we in land use plan ning and smart growth issues. Data from a King County study makes the answer clear

459

Sharpening the Focus of Yolo County Land Use Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sharpening the Focus of Yolo County Land Use Policy Kurt R. Richter University of California Agricultural Issues Center October 2009 #12;Sharpening the Focus of Yolo County Land Use Policy II University of California Agricultural Issues Center #12;Sharpening the Focus of Yolo County Land Use Policy III Making

Ferrara, Katherine W.

460

Clark County REMC- Clark County REMC- Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Clark County REMC provides incentives for residential members to upgrade to more efficient household equipment. Rebates are available for air-source heat pumps, geothermal heat pumps, central air...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Grant County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Grant County Wind Farm Grant County Wind Farm Jump to: navigation, search Name Grant County Wind Farm Facility Grant County Wind Farm Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Olympus Power Developer Suzlon and Juhl Wind Location 5 miles west of Hoffman and 6 miles south of Barrett MN Coordinates 45.82868°, -95.795288° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.82868,"lon":-95.795288,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

462

Day County Wind Project | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Wind Project County Wind Project Jump to: navigation, search Name Day County Wind Project Facility Day County Wind Project Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Basin Electric Location East of Groton SD Coordinates 45.457157°, -97.754831° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.457157,"lon":-97.754831,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

463

Hancock County Wind Farm | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hancock County Wind Farm Hancock County Wind Farm Facility Hancock County Wind Farm Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner NextEra Energy Resources Developer NextEra Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Alliant Energy (44 MW); rest purchased by Corn Belt Cooperative and Cedar Falls Location Hancock County IA Coordinates 43.066524°, -93.70481° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.066524,"lon":-93.70481,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

464

Wood River Levee Reconstruction, Madison County, IL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Wood River Levee Reconstruction, Madison County, IL 25 October 2006 Abstract: The recommended plan provides for flood damage reduction and restores the original degree of protection of the Wood River Levee-federal sponsor is the Wood River Drainage and Levee District. The Wood River Levee System was authorized

US Army Corps of Engineers

465

Report of Science Advisors Solano County  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Water and Sediment Quality 4.0 Specific Habitat Types and Areas of High Conservation Concern 4.1 Vernal1 Report of Science Advisors Solano County Natural Community Conservation Plan Habitat Conservation for Grasslands 3.4 Research Needs for Riparian Woodland 3.5 Research Needs for Vernal Pool Plant Communities 3

466

Building Environmental Health Capacity in Allegheny County  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Building Environmental Health Capacity in Allegheny County: Environmental Indicators Outcomes standard Air Quality Computer Systems Days exceeding ozone standard Air Quality Computer Systems Attainment of the annual PM-2.5 standard (Fine particulates) Air Quality Computer Systems Annual PM-2.5 level Air Quality

467

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County September 20, 2010 - 3:00pm Addthis New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County’s courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County | New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County

468

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County Fewer lights, Brighter Shine in New Hampshire County September 20, 2010 - 3:00pm Addthis New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County’s courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County | New sodium lamp lights at Strafford County's courthouse parking lot are expected to save the county $6,000 on energy bills annually. | Photo courtesy of Strafford County

469

Table S1. Cotton extent and Mexican free-tailed bat population size per county. County State  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

File S1 Table S1. Cotton extent and Mexican free-tailed bat population size per county. County State Bat population size Mean cotton hectares* County State Bat population size Mean cotton hectares 28,255 4,127 *From 1990 to 2008 Table S2. Upland and Pima cotton price over time. Year Upland Cotton

Russell, Amy L.

470

Quantifying Risk Associated with Potential Bird-Aircraft Collisions  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the southwest portion of King County, WA (472629 North,International Airport, King County, Washington, are raised

Schafer, Laurence M.; Blackwell, Bradley F.; Linnell, Michael A.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance Rockingham County - Small Wind Ordinance < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Industrial Institutional Local Government Nonprofit Residential Schools Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State Virginia Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative In October 2004, the Rockingham County Board of Supervisors approved a zoning ordinance for small wind energy systems, the first of its kind in Virginia. Students at James Madison University drafted the original ordinance with guidance from members of the Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative (VWEC) and assistance from members of Rockingham County's planning board. Although net metering is not required, the ordinance complements the

472

County of Los Angeles, California | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Los Angeles, California Los Angeles, California Jump to: navigation, search Name County of Los Angeles Place Los Angeles, CA Website http://www.countyoflosangeles. References County of Los Angeles, California[1] Information About Partnership with NREL Partnership with NREL Yes Partnership Type Test & Evaluation Partner Partnering Center within NREL Electricity Resources & Building Systems Integration LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! County of Los Angeles, California is a company located in Los Angeles, CA. References ↑ "County of Los Angeles, California" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=County_of_Los_Angeles,_California&oldid=379305" Categories: Clean Energy Organizations Companies

473

Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) Los Angeles County - Commercial PACE (California) < Back Eligibility Commercial Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Cooling Other Construction Heat Pumps Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Manufacturing Home Weatherization Windows, Doors, & Skylights Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Program Info State California Program Type PACE Financing Businesses in Los Angeles County may be eligible for the county's Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program. PACE programs allow businesses to finance energy and water efficiency projects which are repaid through a special assessment on the business's property taxes. The property must be

474

Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program Aspen and Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program < Back Eligibility Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Other Solar Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Wind Program Info State Colorado Program Type Building Energy Code Provider Community Office for Resource Efficiency (CORE) The City of Aspen and Pitkin County have adopted the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), with some amendments, as their official energy code effective March 9, 2010. The [http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/county/countycode/Building%20C...

475

Mason County PUD 3 - Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates Mason County PUD 3 - Commercial and Industrial Energy Rebates < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Industrial Local Government Nonprofit State Government Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Construction Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Other Appliances & Electronics Commercial Lighting Lighting Manufacturing Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Lighting Rebates: Up to 70% of project cost Prescriptive Rebates: Varies widely, contact Mason County PUD 3 Custom Rebates: Varies widely, contact Mason County PUD 3 Provider Mason County PUD 3 Mason County PUD 3 offers rebates to its non-residential customers for

476

Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy Durham County - High-Performance Building Policy < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Water Heating Wind Program Info State North Carolina Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Durham City and County Durham County adopted a resolution in October 2008 that requires new non-school public buildings and facilities to meet high-performance standards. New construction of public buildings and facilities greater than

477

Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Installer/Contractor Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Water Heating Wind Program Info State Virginia Program Type Green Building Incentive Provider Arlington County In October 1999, the County Board of Arlington adopted a Pilot Green Building Incentive Program using the standards established by the U. S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

478

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Los Angeles Los Angeles County, California to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Los Angeles County, California on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

479

Forest County Potawatomi Community Project | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Forest County Potawatomi Community Project Forest County Potawatomi Community Project Forest County Potawatomi Community Project November 13, 2013 - 10:45am Addthis The Forest County Potawatomi Community, a federally recognized tribe with its reservation in Forest County, Wisconsin, and with trust lands in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, is implementing an integrated renewable energy deployment plan that will provide electricity for the Tribe's government buildings. The U.S. Department of Energy provided $2.6 million in funding for this Community Renewable Energy Deployment (CommRE) project. Biogas Generation Facility The Forest County Potawatomi CommRE project will include installation of a biogas generation plant on Tribe-owned land in Milwaukee County. The digesters associated with the biogas cogeneration plant will utilize a

480

Riverside County - Sustainable Building Policy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

County - Sustainable Building Policy County - Sustainable Building Policy Riverside County - Sustainable Building Policy < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider County of Riverside In February 2009, the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors adopted Policy Number H-29, creating the Sustainable Building Policy. The Policy requires that all new county building projects initiated on or after March 1, 2009 must meet the criteria for LEED certification.The Board of Supervisors may grant exceptions, especially for projects under 5,000 square feet. Additionally, all county buildings project must have a LEED

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Solar Water Heater Rebate Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Solar Water Heater Rebate Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Solar Water Heater Rebate Program Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative - Solar Water Heater Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Solar Water Heating Program Info State Iowa Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount $500 Provider Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative Association Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative Association (Linn County RECA) is a member-owned cooperative. To encourage energy efficiency, Linn County offers a number of rebates to commercial, residential, and agricultural customers. Owners of both new construction and existing buildings are eligible for a $500 rebate for solar water heaters. The water heaters must have an auxiliary tank of at least 40 gallons and the solar water heater

482

Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Cuts Emissions, Promotes Green Growth |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Cuts Emissions, Promotes Green Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Cuts Emissions, Promotes Green Growth Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Cuts Emissions, Promotes Green Growth February 23, 2012 - 6:29pm Addthis The Forest County Potawatomi Tribe's solar system is providing heating, cooling, and electricity to the Tribe's administration building in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Photo from the Forest County Potawatomi Tribe. The Forest County Potawatomi Tribe's solar system is providing heating, cooling, and electricity to the Tribe's administration building in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Photo from the Forest County Potawatomi Tribe. Project Benefits Produce approximately 35,000 kilowatt-hours of clean electricity annually Reduce carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 41 tons per year Preserve and increase local jobs for tribal members and others

483

Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority Jump to: navigation, search Name Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority Place Cape May Court House, New Jersey Zip 8210 Product The CMCMUA was created to design, construct and operate efficient wastewater treatment facilities. References Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority is a company located in Cape May Court House, New Jersey . References ↑ "Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Cap_May_County_Municipal_Utilities_Authority&oldid=343207"

484

Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance Hyde County - Wind Energy Facility Ordinance < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Institutional Local Government Multi-Family Residential Nonprofit Residential Schools State Government Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State North Carolina Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider Hyde County Hyde County, located in eastern North Carolina, adopted a wind ordinance in 2008 to regulate the use of wind energy facilities throughout the county, including waters within the boundaries of Hyde County. The ordinance is substantially similar to the [http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentive2.cfm?Incentive_Code=N... model wind ordinance] drafted by the North Carolina Wind Working Group, and

485

Miami-Dade County - Sustainable Buildings Program (Florida) | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Miami-Dade County - Sustainable Buildings Program (Florida) Miami-Dade County - Sustainable Buildings Program (Florida) Miami-Dade County - Sustainable Buildings Program (Florida) < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Florida Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Miami-Dade County In 2005, the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners passed a [http://www.miamidade.gov/govaction/matter.asp?matter=052213&file=true&ye... resolution] to incorporate sustainable building measures into county facilities. In 2007, Ordinance 07-65 created the Sustainable Buildings Program in the County Code, and Implementing Order 8-8 established specific

486

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Jump to: navigation, search Name Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Place Los Angeles, California Zip 90012-2952 Sector Renewable Energy Product Metro is the regional transportation planner for all of Los Angeles County. It is a developer of renewable energy projects. References Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is a company located in Los Angeles, California . References ↑ "Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

487

Antu County 303 Hydropower Station Co Ltd | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Antu County 303 Hydropower Station Co Ltd Antu County 303 Hydropower Station Co Ltd Jump to: navigation, search Name Antu County 303 Hydropower Station Co., Ltd. Place Jilin Province, China Zip 133613 Sector Hydro Product China-based small hydro CDM project developer. References Antu County 303 Hydropower Station Co., Ltd.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Antu County 303 Hydropower Station Co., Ltd. is a company located in Jilin Province, China . References ↑ "Antu County 303 Hydropower Station Co., Ltd." Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Antu_County_303_Hydropower_Station_Co_Ltd&oldid=342210" Categories: Clean Energy Organizations Companies Organizations

488

Morris County Improvement Authority, Morris County, New Jersey Renewable Energy Initiative  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Morris County Improvement Authority (?Authority?), a public body corporate and politic of the State of New Jersey and created and controlled by the County, at the direction of the County and through the Program guaranteed by the County, financed 3.2 MW of solar projects (?Solar Projects?) at fifteen (15) sites for seven (7) local government units (?Local Units?) in and including the County. The Program uses a Power Purchase Agreement (?PPA?) structure, where the Solar Developer constructs, operates and maintains all of the Solar Projects, for the benefit of the Local Units and the Authority, for the maximum State law allowable PPA period of fifteen (15) years. Although all fifteen (15) sites were funded by the Authority, only the Mennen Arena site was considered for the purposes of the required local match funding for this grant. Specifically at the Mennen Arena site, the Authority financed 1.6 MW of solar panels. On October 18, 2013, the DOE Grant was drawn down following completion of the necessary application documents and final execution of an agreement memorializing the contemplated transaction by the Local Units, the County, The Authority and the solar developer. The proceeds of the DOE Grant were then applied to reduce the PPA price to all Local Units across the program and increase the savings from approximately 1/3 to almost half off the existing and forecasted utility pricing over the fifteen (15) year term, without adversely affecting all of the other benefits. With the application of the rate buy down, the price of electricity purchased under the PPA dropped from 10.9 to 7.7 cents/kWh. This made acquisition of renewable energy much more affordable for the Local Units, and it enhanced the success of the program, which will encourage other counties and local units to develop similar programs.

Bonanni, John [Chair, Morris County Improvement Authority] Chair, Morris County Improvement Authority

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

EIS-0425: Draft Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA

490

EIS-0425: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA

491

EIS-0425: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA

492

EIS-0285-SA-22: Supplement Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, King and Snohomish Counties, WA, in the Snohomish Region

493

EIS-0425: EPA Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA

494

Barnstable County, Massachusetts: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barnstable County, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Barnstable County, Massachusetts: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.8111143°, -70.1455805° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.8111143,"lon":-70.1455805,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

495

Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.745553°, -75.8069082° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":41.745553,"lon":-75.8069082,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

496

County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

antenna re-alignment antenna re-alignment within the fenced area of the Christmas Tree Pass Communication Site, located in Clark County, Nevada RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION A. Proposed Action: Western proposes to re-align the Christmas Tree to Davis antenna within the fenced area of the Christmas Tree Pass Communication Site, Clark County, Nevada. This work is necessary to maintain the safety and reliability of the bulk electrical system. Western will use existing access roads and vehicles such as pickup trucks & crew trucks to bring personnel and equipmentto the work area. The attached map shows the project area location. The legal description is Section 17 Township 31 South, Range 65 East on the Mt. Diablo Meridian (USGS Spirit Mountain, Nevada 7.5' maps). This work is planned to be completed by December 31, 2011.

497

Early Cook County Roads -- Part Two  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Two Two Nature Bulletin No. 739 January 18, 1964 Forest Preserve District of Cook County Seymour Simon, President Roberts Mann, Conservation Editor EARLY COOK COUNTY ROADS -- PART TWO -- THE PLANK ROAD ERA For ten years after Chicago, with a population of 4,170, was chartered as a city in 1837, its commerce and growth were crippled by wretched transportation to and from the hinterlands. During many periods of each year it was surrounded and isolated by mud. To be sure, there were dirt thoroughfares in all directions, graded and drained as best they could in those days, but not surfaced. No one who has never experienced it can appreciate how gooey and gluey a black prairie soil can be when wet. A wagon's wheels often become solid cylinders of mud as wide as a bass drum.

498

Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.0152766°, -75.1311874° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.0152766,"lon":-75.1311874,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

499

Sevier County Electric System | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

System System Jump to: navigation, search Name Sevier County Electric System Place Tennessee Utility Id 16949 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Commercial Rate- GSA1 Commercial Commercial Rate- GSA2 Commercial Commercial Rate- GSA3 Commercial Residential Rate Residential Average Rates Residential: $0.0925/kWh Commercial: $0.0984/kWh Industrial: $0.0834/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Sevier_County_Electric_System&oldid=411506

500

Building Green in Greensburg: Kiowa County Courthouse  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Courthouse Courthouse The Kiowa County Courthouse, originally built in 1914, was one of the only buildings not completely destroyed by the tornado. However, it was severely damaged by a vehicle that crashed through the roof, allowing rain to fall inside for 3 days. Luckily, most of the County's paperwork was salvaged thanks to quick action taken by the community the day after the tornado. Completed in July 2009, the building was renovated with sustainable and energy- saving technologies while staying true to the structure's original design. It is designed to meet the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED ® ) Gold designation and is projected to be 37% more energy efficient than an ASHRAE 90.1-2004 energy code minimum courthouse.