Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Category:Yakima, WA | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yakima, WA Yakima, WA Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Yakima, WA" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total. SVFullServiceRestaurant Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVFullServiceRestauran... 61 KB SVHospital Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVHospital Yakima WA P... 58 KB SVLargeHotel Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeHotel Yakima WA... 58 KB SVLargeOffice Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeOffice Yakima W... 58 KB SVMediumOffice Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMediumOffice Yakima ... 57 KB SVMidriseApartment Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMidriseApartment Yak... 59 KB SVOutPatient Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVOutPatient Yakima WA... 63 KB SVPrimarySchool Yakima WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png

2

Yakima County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yakima County, Washington: Energy Resources Yakima County, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.543606°, -120.7558292° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.543606,"lon":-120.7558292,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

3

EA-1951: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade Transmission Line, Benton and Yakima Counties, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Bonneville Power Administration is preparing an EA to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed rebuild of the 34-mile Midway-Moxee transmission line in Benton and Yakima Counties, Washington.

4

Low-temperature geothermal resource and stratigraphy of portions of Yakima County, Washington  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The low-temperature geothermal resource of portions of Yakima County, south-central Washington, is defined by several least squares linear regression analyses of bottom-hole temperature and depth data. Intra-borehole flow prevents the use of borehole temperature gradients for geothermal resource assessment. Bottom-hole temperature and depth data were separated into fourteen well data groups based on geographic proximity, land slope azimuth, and position within the regional ground-water flow system. The regression analyses of these well data groups indicate that the projected land-surface temperature and geothermal gradient range from 10.6 to 14.0/sup 0/C and from 24.9 to 52.2/sup 0/C/km, respectively. The depth to the 20/sup 0/C isotherm ranges from 142 to 346m. The average projected land-surface temperature and geothermal gradient are approximately 11.3/sup 0/C and 43.0/sup 0/C/km, respectively. The average depth to the 20/sup 0/C isoterm is approximately 202m. The projected land-surface temperature appears to decrease and the depth to the 20/sup 0/C isotherm appears to increase as the land-surface elevation of the well dat group increases. Stratigraphic correlation diagrams developed from borehole geophysical and lithologic logs are given for localities within the lower Yakima, Black Rock, Moxee, Ahtanum, Cowiche, and Naches valleys. These correlation diagrams are combined with their respective borehole temperatue logs and well data group predicted temperature curves to assess the validity of the regression analyses and to determine aquifer locations, temperatures, and directions of intra-borehole flow.

Biggane, J.

1982-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

5

Low-temperature geothermal resource and stratigraphy of portions of Yakima County, Washington  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The low-temperature geothermal resource of portions of Yakima County, south-central Washington, is defined by several least squares linear regression analyses of bottom-hole temperature and depth data. Bottom-hole temperature and depth data were separated into fourteen well data groups based on geographic proximity, land slope azimuth, and position within the regional ground-water flow system. The depths of these wells range from over 50m to almost 600m. The regression analyses of these well data groups indicate that the projected land-surface temperature and geothermal gradient range from 10.6 to 14.0/sup 0/C and from 24.9 to 52.2/sup 0/C/km, respectively. Stratigraphic correlation diagrams developed from borehole geophysical and lithologic logs are given for localities within the lower Yakima, Black Rock, Moxee, Ahtanum, Cowiche, and Naches valleys. These correlation diagrams are combined with their respective borehole temperature logs and well data group predicted temperature curves to assess the validity of the regression analyses and to determine aquifer locations, temperatures, and directions of intra-borehole flow. A regression analysis of data from wells of south-central Washington with bottom-hole depths of over 700m to almost 3km suggests that the projected land-surface temperature and geothermal gradient of this depth interval are 21.8/sup 0/C and 31.3/sup 0/C/km, respectively. The depth to the 100/sup 0/C isotherm is approximately 2513m.

Biggane, J.

1982-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

6

Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-08)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 7, 2004 April 7, 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-08) memorandum David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWL-4 TO: Proposed Action: Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Under the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (M&E), the coho acclimation research task would be modified to include a new site located in the upper Yakima south of Cle Elum, WA. Project No.: F3204 Location: Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Yakima Fisheries Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (YFP EIS)

7

EA-1855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln 855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA EA-1855: Creston-Bell Rebuild Project, Spokane and Lincoln Counties, WA Summary This EA (also known as DOE/EA-4406 or DOE/BP-4406) evaluates the potential environmental impacts from rebuilding the Creston-Bell No. 1 115-kV transmission line, including the replacement of wood poles and associated structural components and conductor and access road improvements. The 54-mile long, wood pole line extends from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Creston substation to the BPA Bell substation near Spokane in Lincoln and Spokane Counties, Washington. Additional information about this project is available on the BPA website. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download

8

Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

it: EE 000 0853 it: EE 000 0853 Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Kitsap Built Green Projects B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Kitsap County Building Retrofits and Energy Efficiency Upgrades (Green Jobs Initiative) B5.1 except geothermal Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Prohibited: Any implementation of geothermal projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE. Geothermal projects are to be provided to DOE for analysis. Energy Efficiency Implementation and Strategy A9, All, B5.1 None Energy Services Corps A9, All, B5.1

9

Yakima Tributary Access and Habitat Program : Action Plan Final Report 2002.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report covers activities conducted by the Yakima Tributary Access and Habitat Program under Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) grant project No. 2002-025-00 for fiscal year 2002. The Yakima Tributary Access and Habitat Program (YTAHP, Program) was organized to restore salmonid passage to Yakima tributaries that historically supported salmonids and improve habitat in areas where access is restored. Specifically, this program is designed to (a) screen unscreened diversion structures to prevent fish entrainment into artificial waterways; (b) provide for fish passage at man-made barriers, such as diversion dams, culverts, siphons and bridges; and (c) provide information and assistance to landowners interested in to contributing to the improvement of water quality, water reliability and stream habitat. The YTAHP developed from a number of groups actively engaged in watershed management, and/or habitat restoration within the Yakima River Basin. These groups include the Washington State Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Kittitas County Conservation District (KCCD), North Yakima Conservation District (NYCD), Kittitas County Water Purveyors (KCWP), and Ahtanum Irrigation District (AID). The US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and Yakama Nation (YN) both participated in the development of the objectives of YTAHP. Other entities that will be involved during permitting or project review may include the YN, the federal Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and US Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Achievements of YTAHP with BPA Action Plan funding during FY 2002 were to: (1) Establish contracts with RC&D and YTAHP participants. (2) Determine contract mechanism for MWH engineering services. (3) Provide engineering designs and services for 11 early action projects, including inverted siphons, pump and gravity diversion screening, diversion metering, rock weirs for improved fish passage, headgates and fishways. These designs were used to submit for project implementation funding through the WA Salmon Recovery Funding Board. (4) Complete 6 early action projects on Ahtanum Creek--One gravity diversion was replaced with a pump and pump end screen and 5 pump end screens were installed. (5) Conduct two topographic surveys--For the City of Yakima on the Fruitvale diversion for the North Yakima Conservation District to support the installation of a pumping plant which would eliminate the need to divert directly from the Naches River and build the gravel berm each year during low flows. For the Taylor Ditch system for the North Yakima Conservation District to support as feasibility of opening the ditch for habitat and at the same time maintaining irrigation deliveries. (6) Procure materials for use in future YTAHP projects, including siphon pipe, delivery pipe, rock, screens, and water meters. These materials will act as match and support the completion of these subsequent YTAHP projects. Overall, with broad agency support and Action Plan funding through BPA, the YTAHP has achieved substantial enhancements that support aquatic species and which will leverage subsequent work through engineering designs and materials. The program was also able to establish the personnel and equipment support for beginning the stream assessment process on tributaries in Yakima and Kittitas Counties. Completion of this year's effort has provided significant inroads to working on the private lands in two counties which will be vital to future efforts by YTAHP and others to protect and enhance Yakima River Basin habitat.

Myra, David (South Central Washington Resource Conservation and Development Council, Ellensburg, WA); Ready, Carol A. (Kittitas County Water Purveyors, Ellensburg, WA)

2003-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Yakima Tributary Access and Habitat Program, 2002-2003 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Yakima Tributary Access and Habitat Program (YTAHP) was organized to restore salmonid passage to Yakima tributaries that historically supported salmonids and to improve habitat in areas where access is restored. This program intends to (a) screen unscreened diversion structures to prevent fish entrainment into artificial waterways; (b) provide for fish passage at man-made barriers, such as diversion dams, culverts, siphons and bridges; and (c) provide information and assistance to landowners interested in to contributing to the improvement of water quality, water reliability and stream habitat. The YTAHP developed from a number of groups actively engaged in watershed management, and/or habitat restoration within the Yakima River Basin. These groups include the Washington State Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Kittitas County Conservation District (KCCD), North Yakima Conservation District (NYCD), Kittitas County Water Purveyors (KCWP), and Ahtanum Irrigation District (AID). The US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and Yakama Nation (YN) both participated in the development of the objectives of YTAHP. Other entities that will be involved during permitting or project review may include the YN, the federal Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and US Army Corps of Engineers (COE). The objectives of YTAHP are listed below and also include subtasks detailed in the report: (1) Conduct Early Action Projects; (2) Review Strategic Plan; (3) Restore Access, including stream inventory, prioritization, implementation; and (4) Provide opportunities to improve habitat and conserve resources. The BPA YTAHP funding supported activities of the program which are described in this report. These activities are primarily related to objective 1 (conduct early action projects) and parts of objectives 2-4. The work supported by YTAHP funding will support a series of scheduled projects and be made larger by complementary funding through NRSC EQIP, Irrigation Efficiencies, WA State Salmon Recovery Funding Board and other local, state and federal programs. Projects completed FY-03: The Cooke Creek siphon and screen/bypass was completed on time and within budget. The Rosbach Farms project was completed in cooperation with the NRCS Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the KCCD's Irrigation Efficiencies Program. Tributary survey teams were trained and surveys of tributaries in Yakima and Kittitas counties commenced in December of 2002. By the end of September 2003 Cowiche Creek in Yakima County was completed as well as Coleman, Reecer, Currier, Dry, Cabin, Indian, and Jack Creeks in Kittitas County. A screen was installed on the Hernandez/Ringer diversion in cooperation with the NRCS office in Kittitas County. YTAHP submitted six applications to the Salmon Recovery Funding Board and three were selected and funded. Another Salmon Recovery Funding Board project awarded in 2000 to the Yakama Nation was transferred to the KCCD. Two miles of fencing of riparian zones on the north fork Ahtanum was completed by the North Yakima Conservation District in cooperation with the Department of Natural Resources and the Ahtanum Irrigation District and funded by US fish and Wildlife as part of YTAHP's outreach partnering. Completion of this year's effort has provided significant inroads to working on the private lands in two counties which will be vital to future efforts by YTAHP and others to protect and enhance Yakima River Basin habitat. 2003 saw the migration of the WEB site from MWH to the Kittitas County Conservation District and can be accessed at www.kccd.net.

Myra, D.; Ready, C.

2003-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

DOE/EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project --Use of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities (03/08/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 8, 2000 March 8, 2000 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KECN-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-03) David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWN-4 Proposed Action: Yakima Fisheries Project - Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities PL-6: F3204 Location: Yakima, Yakima County, Washington; and Easton, Kittitas County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of several salmonid species in the Yakima and Klickitat river basins. BPA analyzed environmental impacts of research and supplementation projects in the Yakima basin in an

12

Characterization of the environmental fate of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kaurstaki (Btk) after pest eradication efforts in Seattle, WA and Fairfax county, VA  

SciTech Connect

Understanding the fate of biological agents in the environment will be critical to recovery and restoration efforts after a biological attack. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is conducting experiments in the Seattle, WA and Fairfax County, VA areas to study agent fate in urban environments. As part of their gypsy moth suppression efforts, Washington State and Fairfax County have sprayed Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Btk), a common organic pesticide for decades. Many of the spray zones have been in or near urban areas. LANL has collected surface and bulk samples from historical Seattle spray zones to characterize how long Btk persists at detectable levels in the environment, and how long it remains viable in different environmental matrices. This work will attempt to address three questions. First, how long does the agent remain viable at detectable levels? Second, what is the approximate magnitude and duration of resuspension? And third, does the agent transport into buildings? Data designed to address the first question will be presented. Preliminary results indicate Btk remains viable in the environment for at least two years.

Ticknor, Lawrence [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Van Cuyk, Sheila M [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Deshpande, Alina [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Omberg, Kristin M [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

YAKIMA BASIN JOINT BOARD A Partnership of Public Entities Promoting  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

YAKIMA BASIN JOINT BOARD A Partnership of Public Entities Promoting the Multiple Uses of the Yakima for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Jim Trull, President Yakima Basin Joint Board #12;

14

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project...

15

Yakima Fisheries Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

BPA proposes to fund several fishery-related activities in the Yakima River Basin. These activities, known as the Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP), would be jointly managed by the State of Washington and the Yakima Indian Nation. The YFP is included in the Northwest Power Planning Council`s (Council`s) fish and wildlife program. The Council selected the Yakima River system for attention because fisheries resources are severely reduced from historical levels and because there is a significant potential for enhancement of these resources. BPA`s proposed action is to fund (1) information gathering on the implementation of supplementation techniques and on feasibility of reintroducing coho salmon in an environment where native populations have become extinct; (2) research activities based on continuous assessment, feedback and improvement of research design and activities ({open_quotes}adaptive management{close_quotes}); and (3) die construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities for supplementing populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon. Examined in addition to No Action are two alternatives for action: (1) supplementation of depressed natural populations of upper Yakima spring chinook and (2) that same supplementation plus a study to determine the feasibility of reestablishing naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 is the preferred action. A central hatchery would be built for either alternative, as well as three sites with six raceways each for acclimation and release of spring chinook smolts. Major issues examined in the Revised Draft EIS include potential impacts of the project on genetic and ecological resources of existing fish populations, on water quality and quantity, on threatened and endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act, and on the recreational fishery.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Washington (State). Dept. of Fish and Wildlife; Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

Yakima Basin Fish Passage Project, Phase 2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Implementation of the Yakima Basin Fish Passage Project -- Phase 2 would significantly improve the production of anadromous fish in the Yakima River system. The project would provide offsite mitigation and help to compensate for lower Columbia River hydroelectric fishery losses. The Phase 2 screens would allow greater numbers of juvenile anadromous fish to survive. As a consequence, there would be higher returns of adult salmon and steelhead to the Yakima River. The proposed action would play an integral part in the overall Yakima River anadromous fish enhancement program (fish passage improvement, habitat enhancement, hatchery production increases, and harvest management). These would be environmental benefits associated with implementation of the Fish Passage and Protective Facilities Phase 2 Project. Based on the evaluation presented in this assessment, there would be no significant adverse environmental impacts if the proposed action was carried forward. No significant adverse environmental effects have been identified from construction and operation of the Yakima Phase 2 fish passage project. Proper design and implementation of the project will ensure no adverse effects will occur. Based on the information in this environmental analysis, BPA's and Reclamation's proposal to construct these facilities does not constitute a major Federal action that could significantly affect the quality of the human environment. 8 refs., 4 figs., 6 tabs.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pine County Pine County White Pine County Board of County Commissioners Board of County Commissioners February 10, 1998 W. Eric J. Fygi U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel GC-52 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20585 Subject: Department of Energy (DOE) Price-Anderson Act Comments from White Pine County, Nevada Dear Mr. Fygi: Thank you for providing White Pine County with the opportunity to comment concerning the continuation or modifications of the provisions of the Price-Anderson Act. We understand that these comments will be used to assist the Department of Energy in preparing a required report to Congress. You will note in reviewing our comments that the views of many "Affected Units of Government" in Nevada are similar to each other and that we have worked together in developing

18

DOE/EIS-0169-SA-04: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project--Construction/modification upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery and the Marion Drain Hatchery Facilities (11/7/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 7, 2000 November 7, 2000 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-04) memorandum David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWN-4 TO : Proposed Action: Yakima Fisheries Project - Construction/modification upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery and the Marion Drain Hatchery facilities. Project No.: F3204 Location: Prosser and Toppenish, Yakima County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of several salmonid species in the Yakima and Klickitat river basins. BPA analyzed

19

COUNTY\  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA MEMBERS STAFF SUSAN W. DUDLEY, CHAIRMAN BEVERLY J. RELYEA GARY O'CONNOR, VICE CHAIRMAN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT BEN VILJOEN, LIQUOR BOARD (702)485-3406 January 20, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel GCS-52 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA CONCERNING THE CONTINUATION OR MODIFICATION OF DOE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT Dear Sirs: The DOE Price-Anderson indemnification is intended to provide coverage for contractors for the benefit of any victims of a nuclear accident or incident or a precautionary evacuation arising from activity under a DOE contracts. The public perception is that if there is a nuclear accident resulting in a dispersal of

20

Bonneville Power Administration Yakima Fisheries Project; 13Sept1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION YAKIMA FISHERIES PROJECT (YFP) RECORD OF DECISION Summary. As Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), I have decided to implement Alternative 2 of the proposed Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP) to undertake fishery research and mitigation activities in the Yakima River Basin in south- central Washington. The project responds directly to a need for knowledge of viable means to rebuild and maintain naturally spawning anadromous fish stocks in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 would experimentally supplement depressed populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon that spawn naturally, as well as undertake a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing a naturally spawning population and significant fall fishery for coho salmon (now eliminated in the Basin).

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Yakima River Spring Chinook Enhancement Study, 1991 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The population of Yakima River spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha) has been drastically reduced from historic levels reported to be as high as 250,000 adults (Smoker 1956). This reduction is the result of a series of problems including mainstem Columbia dams, dams within the Yakima itself, severely reduced flows due to irrigation diversions, outmigrant loss in irrigation canals, increased thermal and sediment loading, and overfishing. Despite these problems, the return of spring chinook to the Yakima River has continued at levels ranging from 854 to 9,442 adults since 1958. In October 1982, the Bonneville Power Administration contracted the Yakima Indian Nation to develop methods to increase production of spring chinook in the Yakima system. The Yakima Nation's current enhancement policy attempts to maintain the genetic integrity of the spring chinook stock native to the Yakima Basin. Relatively small numbers of hatchery fish have been released into the basin in past years. The goal of this study was to develop data that will be used to present management alternatives for Yakima River spring chinook. A major objective of this study is to determine the distribution, abundance and survival of wild Yakima River spring chinook. The second major objective of this study is to determine the relative effectiveness of different methods of hatchery supplementation. The last three major objectives of the study are to locate and define areas in the watershed that may be used for the rearing of spring chinook; to define strategies for enhancing natural production of spring chinook in the Yakima River; and to determine the physical and biological limitations on production within the system. 47 refs., 89 figs., 67 tabs.

Fast, David E.

1991-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

22

Yakima River Spring Chinook Enhancement Study Appendices, 1991 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document consists of the appendices for annual report DOE/BP/39461--9 which is summarized as follows. The population of Yakima River spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha) has been drastically reduced from historic levels reported to be as high as 250,000 adults (Smoker 1956). This reduction is the result of a series of problems including mainstem Columbia dams, dams within the Yakima itself, severely reduced flows due to irrigation diversions, outmigrant loss in irrigation canals, increased thermal and sediment loading, and overfishing. Despite these problems, the return of spring chinook to the Yakima River has continued at levels ranging from 854 to 9,442 adults since 1958. In October 1982, the Bonneville Power Administration contracted the Yakima Indian Nation to develop methods to increase production of spring chinook in the Yakima system. The Yakima Nation's current enhancement policy attempts to maintain the genetic integrity of the spring chinook stock native to the Yakima Basin. Relatively small numbers of hatchery fish have been released into the basin in past years. The goal of this study was to develop data that will be used to present management alternatives for Yakima River spring chinook. A major objective of this study is to determine the distribution, abundance and survival of wild Yakima River spring chinook. The second major objective of this study is to determine the relative effectiveness of different methods of hatchery supplementation. The last three major objectives of the study are to locate and define areas in the watershed that may be used for the rearing of spring chinook; to define strategies for enhancing natural production of spring chinook in the Yakima River; and to determine the physical and biological limitations on production within the system.

Fast, David E.

1991-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-05) 9/20/02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 20, 2002 September 20, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-05) memorandum David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWL-4 TO: Proposed Action: Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Under the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (M&E), the domestication selection research task would be modified to include a hatchery control line, maintained entirely by spawning hatchery-origin fish. Project No.: F3204 Location: Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of

24

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX SUMMARY This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to provide financial assistance for a project proposed by NRG Energy, Inc (NRG). DOE selected NRG's proposed W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project for a financial assistance award through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Program. NRG would design, construct and operate a commercial-scale carbon dioxide (CO2) capture facility at its existing W.A. Parish Generating Station in Fort Bend County, Texas; deliver the CO2 via a new pipeline to the existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson

25

EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

73: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration 73: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX EIS-0473: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project (PCCS), Fort Bend County, TX SUMMARY This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to provide financial assistance for a project proposed by NRG Energy, Inc (NRG). DOE selected NRG's proposed W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project for a financial assistance award through a competitive process under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Program. NRG would design, construct and operate a commercial-scale carbon dioxide (CO2) capture facility at its existing W.A. Parish Generating Station in Fort Bend County, Texas; deliver the CO2 via a new pipeline to the existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson

26

EA-0941: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration 41: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project, Washington EA-0941: Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy's Bonneville Power Administration to fund that portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to the Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project (Project) in a cooperative effort with the Yakama Indian Nation and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The proposed action would allow the sponsors to ensure property and conduct wildlife management activities for the Project within the boundaries of the Yakama Indian Reservation. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time.

27

Yakima Fisheries Project : Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Summary.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) proposes to fund the Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP) to undertake fishery research and enhancement activities in the Yakima River Basin. The State of Washington and the Yakima Indian Nation would jointly direct the project. The Yakima River system is a promising location for mitigation and enhancement to compensate for stock losses from development and operation of hydroelectric projects elsewhere in the Columbia Basin. The YFP would help determine the role that supplementation might play in increasing natural production of anadromous salmonids throughout the Columbia Basin. In cooperation with BPA, the project managers propose to construct, operate and maintain anadromous (e.g. salmon) fish production facilities. The goal is to conduct research activities designed to increase knowledge of supplementation techniques. These techniques would be applied to rebuild naturally spawning anadromous fish stocks historically present in the Yakima River Basin and, ultimately, those throughout the Columbia River Basin. Eventually, the YFP might involve the supplementation of all stocks of anadromous fish known to have occurred in the Yakima Basin. However, at this time only two alternatives have been proposed: Alternative 1 would supplement depressed naturally spawning populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon; Alternative 2 (preferred) would include all actions under Alternative 1; it would also add a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing a naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho salmon in the Yakima Basin. (Coho smolts are currently being imported from another basin under the Columbia River Basin Fish Management Plan; the stock is now virtually eliminated from the Basin.)

Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington; Washington (State). Dept. of Fish and Wildlife.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Yakima Fisheries Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement : Summary.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) proposes to fund the Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP) to undertake fishery research and mitigation activities in the Yakima River Basin. The State of Washington and the Yakama Indian Nation (YIN) would jointly direct the project. In cooperation with BPA, the project managers propose to construct, operate and maintain anadromous (e.g. salmon) fish production facilities The goal is to conduct research activities designed to increase knowledge of supplementation techniques. These techniques would be applied to rebuild naturally spawning anadromous fish stocks historically present in the Yakima River Basin and, ultimately, those throughout the Columbia River Basin. Eventually, the YFP might involve the supplementation of all stocks of anadromous fish known to have occurred in the Yakima Basin. However, at this time only two action alternatives have been proposed, in addition to the No Action alternative: Alternative (1) would supplement depressed naturally spawning populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon; Alternative (2) (preferred) would include all actions under Alternative 1; it would also add a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing a naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho salmon in the Yakima Basin (Coho smolts are currently being imported from another basin under the Columbia River Basin Fish Management Plan; the stock is now virtually eliminated from the Basin.)

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Washington (State). Dept. of Fish and Wildlife; Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

I Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian - Restoration Project \ , Final Environmental Assessment DOENo. 0941 c Bonneville Power kdmi.nistration, Yakama Indian Nation, Bureawof Indian Affairs % J e;r%mBlYTlON OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED DISCLAIMER This report was .prepared as a n account of work sponsored by an agency of t h e United States Government. Neither t h e United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes a n y legal liability or responsibility for t h e accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial

30

Yakima Habitat Improvement Project Master Plan, Technical Report 2003.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Yakima Urban Growth Area (UGA) is a developing and growing urban area in south-central Washington. Despite increased development, the Yakima River and its tributaries within the UGA continue to support threatened populations of summer steelhead and bull trout as well as a variety of non-listed salmonid species. In order to provide for the maintenance and recovery of these species, while successfully planning for the continued growth and development within the UGA, the City of Yakima has undertaken the Yakima Habitat Improvement Project. The overall goal of the project is to maintain, preserve, and restore functioning fish and wildlife habitat within and immediately surrounding the Yakima UGA over the long term. Acquisition and protection of the fish and wildlife habitat associated with key properties in the UGA will prevent future subdivision along riparian corridors, reduce further degradation or removal of riparian habitat, and maintain or enhance the long term condition of aquatic habitat. By placing these properties in long-term protection, the threat of development from continued growth in the urban area will be removed. To most effectively implement the multi-year habitat acquisition and protection effort, the City has developed this Master Plan. The Master Plan provides the structure and guidance for future habitat acquisition and restoration activities to be performed within the Yakima Urban Area. The development of this Master Plan also supports several Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs) of the NOAA Fisheries 2000 Biological Opinion (BiOp), as well as the Water Investment Action Agenda for the Yakima Basin, local planning efforts, and the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority's 2000 Fish and Wildlife Program. This Master Plan also provides the framework for coordination of the Yakima Habitat Improvement Project with other fish and wildlife habitat acquisition and protection activities currently being implemented in the area. As a result of the planning effort leading to this Master Plan, a Technical Working Group (TWG) was established that represents most, if not all, fish and wildlife agencies/interests in the subbasin. This TWG met regularly throughout the planning process to provide input and review and was instrumental in the development of this plan. Preparation of this plan included the development of a quantitative prioritization process to rank 40,000 parcels within the Urban Growth Area based on the value of fish and wildlife habitat each parcel provided. Biological and physical criteria were developed and applied to all parcels through a GIS-based prioritization model. In the second-phase of the prioritization process, the TWG provided local expert knowledge and review of the properties. In selecting the most critical areas within the Urban Growth Area for protection, this project assessed the value of fish and wildlife habitat on the Yakima River. Well-developed habitat acquisition efforts (e.g., Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project by the Bureau of Reclamation and Yakama Nation acquisition projects) are already underway on the Yakima River mainstem. These efforts, however, face several limitations in protection of floodplain function that could be addressed through the support of the Yakima Habitat Improvement Project. This Master Plan integrates tributary habitat acquisition efforts with those ongoing on the Yakima River to best benefit fish and wildlife in the Urban Growth Area. The parcel ranking process identified 25 properties with the highest fish and wildlife value for habitat acquisition in the Yakima Urban Area. These parcels contain important fish and wildlife corridors on Ahtanum and Wide Hollow Creeks and the Naches River. The fifteen highest-ranking parcels of the 25 parcels identified were considered very high priority for protection of fish and wildlife habitat. These 15 parcels were subsequently grouped into four priority acquisition areas. This Master Plan outlines a four-year schedule for acquisition, protection, and restoration of the 25 highest ranked prop

Golder Associates, Inc.

2003-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

31

Yakima Fisheries Project : Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

BPA proposes to fund several fishery-related activities in the Yakima River Basin. The Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP), included in the Northwest Power Planning Council`s fish and wildlife program, would be jointly managed by the State of Washington and the Yakima Indian Nation. Fisheries resources in the Yakima River are severely reduced from historical levels and there is a significant potential for enhancement of these resources. BPA`s proposed action is to fund (1) information gathering on the implementation of supplementation techniques and on feasibility of reintroducing coho salmon in an environment where native populations have become extinct; (2) research activities based on continuous assessment, feedback and improvement of research design and activities ({open_quotes}adaptive management{close_quotes}); and (3) the construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities for supplementing populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon. The project has been considerably revised from the original proposal described in the first draft EIS. Examined in addition to No Action (which would leave present anadromous fisheries resources unchanged in the, Basin) are two alternatives for action: (1) supplementation of depressed natural populations of upper Yakima spring chinook and (2) that same supplementation plus a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing (via stock imported from another basin) naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 has been identified as the preferred action. Major issues examined in the Revised Draft EIS include potential impacts of the project on genetic and ecological resources of existing fish populations, on water quality and quantity, on threatened and endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act, and on the recreational fishery.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Yakima River Spring Chinook Enhancement Study, 1985 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose was to evaluate enhancement methodologies that can be used to rebuild runs of spring chinook salmon in the Yakima River basin. The objectives were to: (1) determine the abundance, distribution and survival of naturally produced fry and smolts in the Yakima River; (2) evaluate different methods of fry and smolt supplementation into the natural rearing environment while maintaining as much as possible the gentic integrity of naturally produced stocks; (3) locate and define areas in the watershed which may be used for the rearing of spring chinook; (4) define strategies for enhancing natural production of spring chinook in the Yakima River; and (5) determine physical and biological limitations for production within the system.

Fast, David E.

1986-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Category:Seattle, WA | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Seattle, WA Seattle, WA Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Seattle, WA" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total. SVFullServiceRestaurant Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVFullServiceRestauran... 60 KB SVHospital Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVHospital Seattle WA ... 58 KB SVLargeHotel Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeHotel Seattle W... 57 KB SVLargeOffice Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVLargeOffice Seattle ... 57 KB SVMediumOffice Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMediumOffice Seattle... 61 KB SVMidriseApartment Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVMidriseApartment Sea... 58 KB SVOutPatient Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png SVOutPatient Seattle W... 63 KB

34

Yakima River Spring Chinook Enhancement Study, 1988 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Smolt outmigration was monitored at Wapatox on the Naches River and Prosser on the lower Yakima. The spring outmigration at Wapatox was estimated to be smolts. The survival from egg to smolt was calculated using the 1986 redd counts and the 1988 smolt outmigration at Prosser. The smolt to adult survival was calculated based on the 1983 smolt outmigration estimated at Prosser and the 1984 return of jacks (3 year old fish), the 1985 return of four year old adults, and the 1986 return of five year old fish to the Yakima River. 13 refs., 4 figs., 47 tabs.

Fast, David E.

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

20121114 Riverton drinking wa...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Where Does My Drinking Water Come From? Where Does My Drinking Water Come From? Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site F A C T S H E E T ENERGY Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF This fact sheet provides information about the Alternative Water Supply System and domestic wells at the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 Title I processing site at Riverton, Wyoming. The Riverton site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Where Is the Riverton Site? The former Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site is in Fremont County, 2 miles southwest of the town of Riverton and within the boundaries of the Wind River Indian Reservation (Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone). Why Is It a "Site"? A uranium- and vanadium-ore-processing mill operated on the property from 1958 to 1963. Milling operations created

36

GRR/Section 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water Right < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water Right 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water Right.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.80 RCW 90.03.380 90.03.390 RCW 90.44.100 Triggers None specified In 1997, the Washington Legislature authorized the creation of water conservancy boards through the enactment of Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.80 to expedite the administrative process for voluntary water right transfers within individual counties. In counties where a water

37

WA_00_026_WASTE_MANAGEMENT_AND_PROC_INC_and_TEXACO_Waiver_of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA99018TEXACOENERGYSYSTEMSWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA1993023TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome.pdf WA1994001TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIO...

38

WA_02_042_GENERAL_MOTORS_POWER_TRAIN_DIV_Waiver_of_Domestic_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA02042GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA02042GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA02042GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverof...

39

Yakima River Spring Chinook Enhancement Study, 1987 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The smelt outmigration was monitored at wapatox on the Naches River and Prosser on the lower Yakima. The spring outmigration at Wapatox was estimated to be 16,141 smolts. The 1987 spring outmigration of wild spring chinook from the Yakima Basin was estimated to be 251,975 smolts at Prosser. The survival from egg to smelt was calculated using the 1985 redd counts and the 1987 smolt outmigration at Prosser. The estimated survival was 4.16%, which gives a mean egg to smolt survival over four years of 6.32%. In 1987 a total of 3,683 adult and 335 jack spring chinook salmon returning to the Yakima River were counted at Prosser fish ladder. This gives a total of 4,018 salmon returning to Prosser Dam. The median dates of passage were May 12 and May 16 for adults and jacks respectively. An additional 372 fish were estimated to have been caught in the Yakima River subsistence dipnet fishery below Horn Rapids and Prosser Dams. Therefore, total return to the Yakima system was 4,390 spring chinook salmon. Spring chinook were counted at Roza Dam from May 1 to September 30, 1987. Passage at Roza Dam was 1,610 adult and 67 jack spring chinook for a total of 1,677 wild fish. The median dates of passage at Roza Dam were May 29 and May 26 for spring chinook adults and jacks respectively. The smolt to adult (S{sub sa}) survival was calculated based on the 1983 smelt outmigration estimated at Prosser and the 1984 return of jacks (3 year old fish) the 1985 return of four year old adults, and the 1986 return of five year old fish to the Yakima River. It was estimated that 6,012 wild three, four, and five year old fish returned from an estimated smolt outmigration of 135,548 fish in 1983. This gives an estimated survival from smolt to adult of 4.4%. The smolt to adult survival for the 1984 smolt outmigration was 5.3% with 423 jacks returning in 1985, 5,163 four year old adults returning in 1986, and 983 five year old fish returning in 1987 fran an estimated 123,732 smolts in 1984. Spring chinook adults from fourteen different hatchery release groups were recovered in 1987. A total of 211 coded wire tags were recovered and these were expanded to an estimated 253 returning hatchery fish in 1987. Nine of these fish were jacks.

Fast, David E.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Eagle County, Colorado  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VA WA | WI Eagle County, Colorado Three Resort Communities in Colorado Get Smart With Energy Upgrades Photo of a ski lodge with snow surrounding it. An image of a map of the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Yakima River Species Interactions Studies, Annual Report 1998.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Species interactions research and monitoring was initiated in 1989 to investigate ecological interactions among fish in response to proposed supplementation of salmon and steelhead in the upper Yakima River basin. This is the seventh of a series of progress reports that address species interactions research and pre-supplementation monitoring of fishes in the Yakima River basin. Data have been collected prior to supplementation to characterize the ecology and demographics of non-target taxa (NTT) and target taxon, and develop methods to monitor interactions and supplementation success. Major topics of this report are associated with monitoring potential impacts to support adaptive management of NTT and baseline monitoring of fish predation indices on spring chinook salmon smolts. This report is organized into three chapters, with a general introduction preceding the first chapter. This annual report summarizes data collected primarily by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 1998 in the Yakima basin, however these data were compared to data from previous years to identify preliminary trends and patterns.

Pearsons, Todd N.

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

WA_97_032_CHEMICAL_INDUSTRY_ENVIROMENTAL_TECHNOLOGY_PROJECTS...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA97032CHEMICALINDUSTRYENVIROMENTALTECHNOLOGYPROJECTS.pdf WA97032CHEMICALINDUSTRYENVIROMENTALTECHNOL...

43

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 1998.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 19 Phase II screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year study for the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. The sites were examined to determine if they were being effectively operated and maintained to provide fish a safe, efficient return to the Yakima River.

Blanton, S.L.; McMichael, Geoffrey A.; Neitzel, D.A.

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

49: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA 49: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA SUMMARY This EA analyzes the potential environmental effects of a proposal by the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snowhomish County, Washington to construct and operate the Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project. The proposed 680-kilowatt project would be located on the east side of Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, Washington, about 1 kilometer west of Whidbey Island, entirely within Island County, Washington. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the lead agency. DOE is a cooperating agency. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 9, 2013 EA-1949: FERC Notice of Availability Errata Sheet

45

WA_97_038_FORD_MOTOR_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA97038FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA97038FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA97038FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomestican...

46

WA_1995_025_AMOCO_PRODUCTION_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA1995025AMOCOPRODUCTIONCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1995025AMOCOPRODUCTIONCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1995025AMOCOPRODUCTIONCOMPANYWaiverofDom...

47

WA_99_022_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_F...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA99022AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA99022AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA99022AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALWaiverofDome...

48

WA_01_007_SOLAR_TURBINES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_pate...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA07012BOEINGCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeignPate.pdf WA03001CHEVRONTEXACOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPate.pdf WA1993004SOLARTURBINEINCWaivero...

49

WA_99_018_TEXACO_ENERGY_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Forei...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA03037MERIDIANAUTOSYSTEMSWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA03001CHEVRONTEXACOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPate.pdf WA01019GENERALELECTRICCORPWaiver...

50

WA_1994_009_SAINT-BOBAIN-NORTON_INDUSTRIAL_CERAMICS_CORPORAT...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA1993022NORTONCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeignRi.pdf WA97009DETROITDIESELCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1994007KYOCERAINDUSTRIALCERAMIC...

51

WA_04_054_ECR_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_Inven...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA04039HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA06016BPSOLARINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUnd.pdf WA07040GRAFTECHINTERNATIONALLTDW...

52

WA_07_016_OSRAM_SYLVANIA_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA04016MACKTRUCKSWaiverofPatentRightsunderNRELSub.pdf WA06016BPSOLARINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUnd.pdf WA05031OSRAMSYLVANIAPRODUCTSWaiv...

53

GRR/Section 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process 11-WA-b - Human Remains Process (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the necessary procedure when a developer discovers human remains on a project site. In Washington, every person has the duty to notify the coroner upon the discovery of any human remains in the most expeditious manner possible. The Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) handles the disposition of non-forensic remains, while the county coroner handles the disposition of

54

WA-TRIBE-STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA-TRIBE-STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS WA-TRIBE-STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Location: Tribe WA-TRIBE- STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS WA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description The Stillaguamish Tribe proposes to expand its Stillaguamish Tribe Transit Services (STTS). For the past three years, the STTS has employed 14-passenger buses to transport clients to and from the tribal medical, dental, behavioral health and massage clinics. Often the demand-response requests that come to STTS are for one to three passengers at a time; therefore, funds are being requested to purchase a hybrid sedan to transport clients. Conditions: None Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: A1, B1.32, B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21

55

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Genetic Studies; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2005-2006 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report covers one of many topics under the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project's Monitoring and Evaluation Program (YKFPME). The YKFPME is funded under two BPA contracts, one for the Yakama Nation and the other for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (Contract number 22370, Project Number 1995-063-25). A comprehensive summary report for all of the monitoring and evaluation topics will be submitted after all of the topical reports are completed. This approach to reporting enhances the ability of people to get the information they want, enhances timely reporting of results, and provides a condensed synthesis of the whole YKFPME. The current report was completed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Busack, Craig A.; Fritts, Anthony L.; Kassler, Todd (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

WA_05_006_ABENGOA_BIOENERGY_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Domestic_a...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

06ABENGOABIOENERGYCORPORATIONWaiverofDomestica.pdf WA05006ABENGOABIOENERGYCORPORATIONWaiverofDomestica.pdf WA05006ABENGOABIOENERGYCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesti...

57

WA_97_009_DETROIT_DIESEL_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09DETROITDIESELCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA97009DETROITDIESELCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA97009DETROITDIESELCORPORATIONWaiverofDomestica...

58

WA_97_010_DETROIT_DIESEL_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Domestice_and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0DETROITDIESELCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticeand.pdf WA97010DETROITDIESELCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticeand.pdf WA97010DETROITDIESELCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticea...

59

WA_06_034_ENERGY_CONVERSION_DEVICES_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_a...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

06034ENERGYCONVERSIONDEVICESINCWaiverofDomestica.pdf WA06034ENERGYCONVERSIONDEVICESINCWaiverofDomestica.pdf WA06034ENERGYCONVERSIONDEVICESINCWaiverofDom...

60

WA_1993_028_ALLIANCE_ELECTRIC_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2MARTINMARIETTACORPORATIONKNOWASGENERALDYNA.pdf WA1994013GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYCORPORATERESEARCHAND.pdf WA1993023TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

WA_1995_026_CHEVRON_PRODUCTION_COMPNAY_Waiver_of_Domestic_an...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UCTIONCOMPNAYWaiverofDomestican.pdf More Documents & Publications WA1993023TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome.pdf WA1993028ALLIANCEELECTRICCOMPANYWaiver...

62

WA_1994_012_MARTIN_MARIETTA_CORPORATION_KNOW_AS_GENERAL_DYNA...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYCORPORATERESEARCHAND.pdf WA1993028ALLIANCEELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1993023TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome...

63

WA_1994_001_TEXACO_EXPLORATION_AND_PRODUCTION_Waiver_of_Dome...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome.pdf WA1994001TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome.pdf WA1994001TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDom...

64

WA_1993_023_TEXACO_EXPLORATION_AND_PRODUCTION_Waiver_of_Dome...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome.pdf WA1993023TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome.pdf WA1993023TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDom...

65

WA_03_016_GENE_ELEC_HYBRID_POWER_GENERATION_SYSTEMS_Waiver_o...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA03016GENEELECHYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMSWaivero.pdf WA03016GENEELECHYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMS...

66

WA_00_007_COMBUSTION_ENGINEERING_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07COMBUSTIONENGINEERINGINCWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA00007COMBUSTIONENGINEERINGINCWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA00007COMBUSTIONENGINEERINGINCWaiverofDomestica...

67

WA_1995_046_EASTMAN_CHEMICAL_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

46EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1995046EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1995046EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand...

68

WA_1995_015_EASTMAN_CHEMICAL_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1995015EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1995015EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticand...

69

WA_05_022_DOW_CHEMICAL_COMPANY_Waiver_of_domestic_and_Foreig...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofdomesticandForeig.pdf WA05022DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofdomesticandForeig.pdf WA05022DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofdomesticandFore...

70

WA_04_057_CHEMICAL_RESEARCH_AND_LICENSING_CO_Waiver_of_Paten...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7CHEMICALRESEARCHANDLICENSINGCOWaiverofPaten.pdf WA04057CHEMICALRESEARCHANDLICENSINGCOWaiverofPaten.pdf WA04057CHEMICALRESEARCHANDLICENSINGCOWaiverofPat...

71

WA_03_043_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_POWER_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Domestic_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3043GENERALELECTRICPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03043GENERALELECTRICPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03043GENERALELECTRICPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofDom...

72

WA_03_050_GENERAL_ELECTRIC__POWER_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Domestic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

50GENERALELECTRICPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03050GENERALELECTRICPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03050GENERALELECTRICPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofDomes...

73

WA_02_042_GENERAL_MOTORS_POWER_TRAIN_DIV_Waiver_of_Domestic_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

42GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA02042GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA02042GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverofDomest...

74

WA_1994_021_ATLANTA_GAS_LIGHT_AND_ABSORBENT_RESEARCH_Waiver_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4021ATLANTAGASLIGHTANDABSORBENTRESEARCHWaiver.pdf WA1994021ATLANTAGASLIGHTANDABSORBENTRESEARCHWaiver.pdf WA1994021ATLANTAGASLIGHTANDABSORBENTRESEARCHWai...

75

WA_05_060_SHELL_SOLAR_INDUSTRIES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_fore...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

60SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandfore.pdf WA05060SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandfore.pdf WA05060SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandf...

76

WA_97_018_INTERNATIONAL_FUEL_CELLS_CORPS_Waiver_of_Domestic_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7018INTERNATIONALFUELCELLSCORPSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA97018INTERNATIONALFUELCELLSCORPSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA97018INTERNATIONALFUELCELLSCORPSWaiverofDom...

77

WA_02_050_SPECIALIZED_TECHNOLOGY_RESOURCES_Waiver_of_Patent_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

50SPECIALIZEDTECHNOLOGYRESOURCESWaiverofPatent.pdf WA02050SPECIALIZEDTECHNOLOGYRESOURCESWaiverofPatent.pdf WA02050SPECIALIZEDTECHNOLOGYRESOURCESWaiverofPate...

78

WA_04_076_CHEVRONTEXACO_TECHNOLOGY_VENTURES_Waiver_of_Patent...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6CHEVRONTEXACOTECHNOLOGYVENTURESWaiverofPatent.pdf WA04076CHEVRONTEXACOTECHNOLOGYVENTURESWaiverofPatent.pdf WA04076CHEVRONTEXACOTECHNOLOGYVENTURESWaiverofPate...

79

WA_04_028_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_patent_Rights...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4028AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofpatentRights.pdf WA04028AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofpatentRights.pdf WA04028AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofpatent...

80

WA_1995_012_ENGELHARDT_INSTITUTE_OF_MOLECULAR_BIOLOGY_Waiver...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12ENGELHARDTINSTITUTEOFMOLECULARBIOLOGYWaiver.pdf WA1995012ENGELHARDTINSTITUTEOFMOLECULARBIOLOGYWaiver.pdf WA1995012ENGELHARDTINSTITUTEOFMOLECULARBIOLOGYWaive...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects August 11, 2010 - 1:01pm Addthis An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, and the energy efficient windows framed behind her. | Photo courtesy of Kitsap County, WA | An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, and the energy efficient windows framed behind her. | Photo courtesy of Kitsap County, WA | Maya Payne Smart Former Writer for Energy Empowers, EERE Autumn Salamack's career moved in a welcome new direction when she became the resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, in

82

Yakima River Basin Phase II Fish Screen Evaluations, 2002  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 2002, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory evaluated 23 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met National Marine Fisheries Service criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage and whether bypass outfall conditions allowed fish to safely return to the river. In addition, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2002, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by the National Marine Fisheries Service. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to increase safe juvenile fish passage. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well greased and operative. (5) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris should be improved at some sites.

Carter, Jessica A.; McMichael, Geoffrey A.; Chamness, Mickie A.

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

Yakima River Basin Phase II Fish Screen Evaluations, 2003  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 2003, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 23 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the Nation Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2003, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve juvenile fish passage conditions. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well greased and operative. (5) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites.

Vucelick, Jessica A.; McMichael, Geoffrey A.; Chamness, Mickie A.

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Relative risk site evaluations for Yakima Training Center  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

All 20 U.S. Army Yakima Training Center (YTC) sites evaluated were given a `low` relative risk. At Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 22, a `minimum` soils contaminant hazard factor was assigned even though 6,700 mg/kg TPH-diesel was found in surface soil. SWMU 22 is physically located on top of and with the fence surrounding Area of Concern (AOC) 4. Because the diesel is most likely associated with AOC 4, and plans are to clean up AOC 4, any further actions regarding these contaminated soils should be addressed as part of the planned actions for AOC 4. Contaminant hazard factors of `moderate` were assigned to the soil pathway for SWMUs 4 and 7 because dieldrin and arsenic, respectively, were found in surface soil samples at concentrations exceeding standards. A `moderate` contaminant hazard factor was also assigned to the sediment pathway for AOC 1 because arsenic detected in sediments in `Larry`s Swimming Pool` exceeded the standard. All other contaminant hazard factors were rated as minimal. The receptor factor for all sites and pathways was rated `limited,` except for SWMU 54 in which the groundwater receptor factor was rated `potential.` A `potential` rating was assigned to the groundwater pathway at this site to be conservative. The site is located on the south side of the syncline axis where the unconfined aquifer may be present and there are no monitoring wells at the site to confirm or deny the presence of groundwater contamination.

Smith, R.M.; Whelan, G.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

WA_01_023_BP_NORTH_AMERICAN_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_I...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-002 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-016 WA1993023TEXACOEXPLORATIONANDPRODUCTIONWaiverofDome...

86

WA_05_046_GENERAL_MOTORS_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Publications WA04070GENERALMOTORSCORPORATIONWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA02042GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverofDomestic.pdf Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-031...

87

WA_01_029_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_R_and_D_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_under...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA01029GENERALELECTRICRandDWaiverofPatentRightsunder.pdf WA01029GENERALELECTRICRandDWaiverofPatentRightsunder.pdf WA01029GENERALELECTRICRandDWaiver...

88

RECIPIENT:WA Dept. of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT SEP ARRA SIRTI -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA Dept. of Commerce STATE: WA WA Dept. of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT SEP ARRA SIRTI - Demand Energy - Energy Storage System Tied to Solar on Commercial Facility TITLE: Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm Number DE-FOA-0000052 DE-EEOOO0139 GFO-o000139-031 Based on my review ofthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and demand studies), and dissemination (including, but not limited to, document mailings, publication, and distribution;

89

Changes related to "Category:Seattle, WA" | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

page Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Changes related to "Category:Seattle, WA" Category:Seattle, WA Jump to: navigation, search This is a list of changes...

90

Yakima River Radio-Telemetry Study: Spring Chinook Salmon, 1991-1992 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

As part of the presupplementation planning, baseline data on the productivity of spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Yakima River have been collected. However, for adult salmonids, data on habitat use, delays in passage at irrigation diversions, migration rates, and substock separation had not been previously collected. In 1991, the National Marine Fisheries Service began a 2-year radio-telemetry study of adult spring chinook salmon in the Yakima River Basin. Specific objectives addressed in this study were: to determine spawning populations` run timing, passage patterns at irrigation diversion dams, and morphometric characteristics to determine where and when substocks become separated; to evaluate fish passage at Yakima River Basin diversion dams including Prosser, Sunnyside, Wapato, Roza, Town Diversion, Easton, Cowiche, and Wapatox Dams; to determine spring chinook salmon migration rates between Yakima River Basin dams, prespawning behavior, temporal distribution, and habitat utilization; to identify spawning distribution and timing of spring chinook salmon; to determine the amount and cause of prespawning mortality of spring chinook salmon; and to evaluate adult fish-handling procedures for the right-bank, adult-trapping facility at Prosser Dam.

Hockersmith, Eric

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

WA_1994_027_FORD_MOTOR_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreig...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4027FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA1994027FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA1994027FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFo...

92

WA_99_015_FORD_MOTOR_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

99015FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA99015FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA99015FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandF...

93

WA_1993_032_FORD_MOTOR_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreig...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA1993032FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA1993032FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForei...

94

WA_04_026_ENERGY_CONVERSION_DEVICES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_F...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6ENERGYCONVERSIONDEVICESWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA04026ENERGYCONVERSIONDEVICESWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA04026ENERGYCONVERSIONDEVICESWaiverofDomesticand...

95

WA_1993_018_CONSOLIDATION_COAL_CO_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_For...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18CONSOLIDATIONCOALCOWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA1993018CONSOLIDATIONCOALCOWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA1993018CONSOLIDATIONCOALCOWaiverofDomesticandFo...

96

WA_03_015_HYBRID_POWER_GENERATION_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Domestic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA03015HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03015HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMS...

97

WA_07_022_SIEMENS_POWER_GENERATION_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Righ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA07022SIEMENSPOWERGENERATIONINCWaiverofPatentRigh.pdf WA07022SIEMENSPOWERGENERATIONINCWaiv...

98

WA_1994_022_CUMMINS_POWER_GENERATION_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA1994022CUMMINSPOWERGENERATIONWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1994022CUMMINSPOWERGENERATIONWaivero...

99

WA_03_017_HYBRID_POWER_GENERATION_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Domestic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA03017HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03017HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMS...

100

WA_1993_006_CUMMINS_POWER_GENERATION_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA1993006CUMMINSPOWERGENERATIONINCWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA1993006CUMMINSPOWERGENERATIONINCWaiv...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

WA_98_006_WESTINGHOUSE_POWER_GENERATION_A_FORMER_DIVISION_OF...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA98006WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISIONOF.pdf WA98006WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMER...

102

WA_04_017_CUMMINS_POWER_GENERATION_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA04017CUMMINSPOWERGENERATIONWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA04017CUMMINSPOWERGENERATIONWaivero...

103

WA_1995_035_ABB_POWER_GENERATION_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA1995035ABBPOWERGENERATIONINCWaiverofDomesticand.pdf WA1995035ABBPOWERGENERATIONINCWaiv...

104

WA_04_080_HYBRID_POWER_GENERATION_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Patent_R...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA04080HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentR.pdf WA04080HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMS...

105

WA_98_005_WESTINGHOUSE_POWER_GENERATION_A_FORMER_DIVISION_OF...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA98005WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMERDIVISIONOF.pdf WA98005WESTINGHOUSEPOWERGENERATIONAFORMER...

106

WA_03_014_HYBRID_POWER_GENERATION_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Domestic...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home WA03014HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03014HYBRIDPOWERGENERATIONSYSTEMS...

107

WA_02_011_BP_AMOCO_CHEMICAL_CO_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreig...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1BPAMOCOCHEMICALCOWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA02011BPAMOCOCHEMICALCOWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA02011BPAMOCOCHEMICALCOWaiverofDomesticandFore...

108

WA_1993_036_DOW_CHEMICAL_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

36DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA1993036DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA1993036DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFor...

109

WA_01_032_DOW_CHEMICAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_foreign_Patent...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1032DOWCHEMICALWaiverofDomesticandforeignPatent.pdf WA01032DOWCHEMICALWaiverofDomesticandforeignPatent.pdf WA01032DOWCHEMICALWaiverofDomesticandforeign...

110

WA_06_019_NALCO_CHEMICAL_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19NALCOCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA06019NALCOCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA06019NALCOCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandF...

111

WA_03_033_GE_WIND_ENERGY_LLC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3GEWINDENERGYLLCWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA03033GEWINDENERGYLLCWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA03033GEWINDENERGYLLCWaiverofDomesticandForeig...

112

WA_00_012_3M_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Rights_u...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DomesticandForeignRightsu.pdf More Documents & Publications WA99008DUPONTSUPERCONDUCTIVITYWaiverofUSandForeign.pdf WA03046INTERMAGNETICSGENERALCORPWaiverofDo...

113

WA_99_008_DUPONT_SUPERCONDUCTIVITY_Waiver_of_US_and_Foreign_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9008DUPONTSUPERCONDUCTIVITYWaiverofUSandForeign.pdf WA99008DUPONTSUPERCONDUCTIVITYWaiverofUSandForeign.pdf WA99008DUPONTSUPERCONDUCTIVITYWaiverofUSandFo...

114

WA_07_012_BOEING_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Pate...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THEBOEINGCOMPANYWaiverofdomesticandForeign.pdf WA01007SOLARTURBINESWaiverofDomesticandForeignpate.pdf WA03001CHEVRONTEXACOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPate...

115

WA_04-001_AMENDED_SILICATES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_I...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PHILLIPSPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA00001PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignInventi.pdf WA03001CHEVRONTEXACOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPate...

116

WA_97_027_GENERAL_ATOMICS__CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Domestic_an...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EDSOLARSYSTEMSCORPWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA01034INGERSOLL-RANDENERGYSYSTEMSWaiverofDomestica.pdf WA00003DUKESOLARENERGYWaiverofDomesticandForeignP.pdf...

117

WA_03_013_ANADARKO_PETROLEUM_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3013ANADARKOPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA03013ANADARKOPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA03013ANADARKOPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandFo...

118

WA_-01_001_PHILLIPS_PETROLEUM_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-01001PHILLIPSPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA-01001PHILLIPSPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA-01001PHILLIPSPETROLEUMWaiverofDomesticand...

119

WA_04_036_HRL_Laboratories_LLC_.Waiver_pof_dDomestic_fand_Fo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA02042GENERALMOTORSPOWERTRAINDIVWaiverofDomestic.pdf WA03044CATERPILLARINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignR...

120

WA_01_014_VOITH_FABRICS_APPLETON_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1014VOITHFABRICSAPPLETONWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA01014VOITHFABRICSAPPLETONWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA01014VOITHFABRICSAPPLETONWaiverofDomestican...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

WA_98_019_SIEMENS_SOLAR_INDUSTRIES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8019SIEMENSSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA98019SIEMENSSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA98019SIEMENSSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomestic...

122

WA_1995_030_GOLDEN_PHOTON_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30GOLDENPHOTONINCWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA1995030GOLDENPHOTONINCWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA1995030GOLDENPHOTONINCWaiverofDomesticandForeig...

123

WA_05_059_SHELL_SOLAR_INDUSTRIES_LP_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_F...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

59SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESLPWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA05059SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESLPWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf WA05059SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESLPWaiverofDomestican...

124

WA_1995_002_SIEMENS_SOLAR_INDUSTRIES_Waiver_of_US_and_Foreig...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

02SIEMENSSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofUSandForeig.pdf WA1995002SIEMENSSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofUSandForeig.pdf WA1995002SIEMENSSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofUSandForei...

125

WA_00_028_LOUISIANA_PACIFIC_CORP_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0028LOUISIANAPACIFICCORPWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA00028LOUISIANAPACIFICCORPWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA00028LOUISIANAPACIFICCORPWaiverofDomestican...

126

WA_03_010_SHELL_SOLAR_INDUSTRIES_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA03010SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA03010SHELLSOLARINDUSTRIESWaiverofDomesticandF...

127

WA_98_008_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_COMPANY_Waiver_Under_a_Subcontrac...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA98008GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverUnderaSubcontrac.pdf WA98008GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverUnderaSubcontrac.pdf More Documents & Publications...

128

WA_01_019_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_CORP_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Forei...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA01019GENERALELECTRICCORPWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA01019GENERALELECTRICCORPWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf More Documents & Publications...

129

WA_04_020_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_In...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WA04020GENERALELECTRICWaiverofDomesticandForeignIn.pdf WA04020GENERALELECTRICWaiverofDomesticandForeignIn.pdf More Documents & Publications...

130

WA_03_019_GENERAL_MOTORS_CORP_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SCORPWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf More Documents & Publications WA01019GENERALELECTRICCORPWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA1993020GENERALMOTORSWaiverofDomest...

131

WA_04_034_NUVERA_FUEL_CELLS_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Forei...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04034NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04034NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandFor...

132

WA_04_041_NUVERA_FUEL_CELLS_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Forei...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04041NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandForei.pdf WA04041NUVERAFUELCELLSINCWaiverofDomesticandFo...

133

WA_03_054_HEIL_TRAILER_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ADVANCEDTECHNLOGYMATERIALSWaiverofDomestican.pdf WA04054ECRINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightstoInven.pdf WA02035BPSOLARINTERNATIONALWaiverofDomesticandFore...

134

WA_04_055_BALLARD_POWER_SYSTEMS_CORP_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA99014UNITEDSOLARSYSTEMSCORPWaiverofDomesticandF.pdf...

135

WA_04_083_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04083AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04083AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRigh...

136

WA_00_027_HONEYWELL_POWER_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights.pdf...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7HONEYWELLPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA00027HONEYWELLPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA00027HONEYWELLPOWERSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf...

137

WA_05_062_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Patent_R...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5062UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentR.pdf WA05062UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentR.pdf WA05062UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPORATIONWaiverofPa...

138

WA_04_082_DELPHI_AUTOMOTIVE_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4082DELPHIAUTOMOTIVESYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04082DELPHIAUTOMOTIVESYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04082DELPHIAUTOMOTIVESYSTEMSWaiverofPatentR...

139

WA_02_015_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Ri...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofPatentRi.pdf WA02015AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofPatentRi.pdf WA02015AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSINCWaiverofPatent...

140

WA_07_040_GRAFTECH_INTERNATIONAL_LTD_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

40GRAFTECHINTERNATIONALLTDWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA07040GRAFTECHINTERNATIONALLTDWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA07040GRAFTECHINTERNATIONALLTDWaiverofPatentRig...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

WA_06_032_HONEYWELL_TURBO_TECHNOLOGIES_Waiver_of_Patent_Righ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2HONEYWELLTURBOTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRigh.pdf WA06032HONEYWELLTURBOTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRigh.pdf WA06032HONEYWELLTURBOTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRi...

142

WA_04_040_HONEYWELL_INTERNATIONAL_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Right...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALINCWaiverofPatentRight.pdf WA04040HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALINCWaiverofPatentRight.pdf WA04040HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALINCWaiverofPatentRig...

143

WA_06_005_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA06005AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA06005AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRigh...

144

WA_04_012_MACK_TRUCK_INC_Waiver_of_patent_Rights_under_NREL_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2MACKTRUCKINCWaiverofpatentRightsunderNREL.pdf WA04012MACKTRUCKINCWaiverofpatentRightsunderNREL.pdf WA04012MACKTRUCKINCWaiverofpatentRightsunderNRE...

145

WA_04_025_AIR_LIQUIDE_AMERICA_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25AIRLIQUIDEAMERICAWaiverofPatentRightsunder.pdf WA04025AIRLIQUIDEAMERICAWaiverofPatentRightsunder.pdf WA04025AIRLIQUIDEAMERICAWaiverofPatentRightsund...

146

WA_04_043_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_t...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

43UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA04043UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA04043UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRight...

147

WA_05_037_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_t...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA05037UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA05037UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRights...

148

WA_05_033_EASTMAN_CHEMICAL_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_t...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

33EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA05033EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA05033EASTMANCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRight...

149

WA_04_063_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04063AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA04063AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRigh...

150

WA_01_005__PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_patent...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignpatent.pdf WA01005PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignpatent.pdf WA01005PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignpate...

151

WA_05_029_AIR_PRODUCTS_AND_CHEMICALS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA05029AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA05029AIRPRODUCTSANDCHEMICALSWaiverofPatentRigh...

152

WA_05_025_GE_NUCLEAR_ENERGY_Waiver_of_patent_Rights_Under_a_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5025GENUCLEARENERGYWaiverofpatentRightsUndera.pdf WA05025GENUCLEARENERGYWaiverofpatentRightsUndera.pdf WA05025GENUCLEARENERGYWaiverofpatentRightsUn...

153

WA_03_048_AMERICAN_SUPERCONDUCTOR_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Righ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

48AMERICANSUPERCONDUCTORCORPWaiverofPatentRigh.pdf WA03048AMERICANSUPERCONDUCTORCORPWaiverofPatentRigh.pdf WA03048AMERICANSUPERCONDUCTORCORPWaiverofPatentR...

154

WA_03_021_DELPHI_AUTOMOTIVE_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1DELPHIAUTOMOTIVESYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA03021DELPHIAUTOMOTIVESYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRights.pdf WA03021DELPHIAUTOMOTIVESYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRight...

155

WA_06_033_PARKER_HANNIFIN_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Patent_Right...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3PARKERHANNIFINCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentRight.pdf WA06033PARKERHANNIFINCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentRight.pdf WA06033PARKERHANNIFINCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentRig...

156

WA_07_015_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_t...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA07015UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA07015UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRight...

157

WA_04_072_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_CORP_Waiverof_Patent_Rights_to...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightsto.pdf WA04072UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRightsto.pdf WA04072UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPWaiverofPatentRights...

158

WA_1995_047_BLACK_CLAWSON_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_For...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7BLACKCLAWSONCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA1995047BLACKCLAWSONCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFor.pdf WA1995047BLACKCLAWSONCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandFor...

159

WA_98_020_THERMO_BLACK_CLAWSON_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0THERMOBLACKCLAWSONINCWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA98020THERMOBLACKCLAWSONINCWaiverofDomesticandFo.pdf WA98020THERMOBLACKCLAWSONINCWaiverofDomesticand...

160

WA_04_075_VARIAN_MEDICAL_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Fore...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

75VARIANMEDICALSYSTEMSWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA04075VARIANMEDICALSYSTEMSWaiverofDomesticandFore.pdf WA04075VARIANMEDICALSYSTEMSWaiverofDomesticandF...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

WA_1993_041_ROCKETDYNE_AND_LLNL_Waiver_of_the_Governments_U.pdf...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1ROCKETDYNEANDLLNLWaiveroftheGovernmentsU.pdf WA1993041ROCKETDYNEANDLLNLWaiveroftheGovernmentsU.pdf WA1993041ROCKETDYNEANDLLNLWaiveroftheGovernmentsU.pd...

162

WA_1993_004_SOLAR_TURBINE_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04SOLARTURBINEINCWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA1993004SOLARTURBINEINCWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA1993004SOLARTURBINEINCWaiverofDomesticandForeig...

163

BayWa Group | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

BayWa Group BayWa Group Jump to: navigation, search Name BayWa Group Place Munich, Germany Zip 81925 Sector Services, Solar Product Germany-based company with international operations specialised in wholesale and retail and in providing services. The company is also active in the biofuel and solar sectors. Coordinates 48.136415°, 11.577531° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":48.136415,"lon":11.577531,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

164

Fabricate and Install Yakima Basin Phase II Fish Screens; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2006 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The goal of this project was to restore ESA listed and resident fish stocks within the Yakima Basin by preventing mortality and/or injury to all life stages of anadromous and resident fish at irrigation diversions. This goal is being accomplished through an on-going effort by the Yakima Basin Phase II Technical Work Group (TWG), which is comprised of local, state, federal, tribal and private groups who prioritize and assign screening projects.

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff, (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Habitat Program, Yakima, WA)

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

counties - Counties Data | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Counties Data Counties Data Apps Challenges Policies Counties You are here Data.gov Communities Counties Counties Data This page features datasets from participating...

166

Fourth Annual SECA Meeting - Seattle, WA  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fourth Annual SECA Meeting - Seattle, WA Fourth Annual SECA Meeting - Seattle, WA April 15-16, 2003 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Expanded Applications of SECA Fuel Cells SECA Industrial Team Reports Military Applications of Fuel Cells Technology Highlights Environmental Considerations Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

167

,"Sumas, WA Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (MMcf)"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Sumas, WA Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2012 ,"Release Date:","172014" ,"Next...

168

Yakima River Basin Fish Passage Phase II Fish Screen Construction, Project Completion Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

On December 5, 1980, Congress passed the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Public Law 96-501). The Act created the Northwest Power Planning Council (now the Northwest Power and Conservation Council). The Council was charged with the responsibility to prepare a Regional Conservation and Electric Power Plan and to develop a program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife including related spawning grounds and habitat on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The Council adopted its Fish and Wildlife Program on November 15, 1982. Section 800 of the Program addresses measures in the Yakima River Basin. The Yakima measures were intended to help mitigate hydroelectric impacts in the basin and provide off-site mitigation to compensate for fish losses caused by hydroelectric project development and operations throughout the Columbia River Basin. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) was designated as a major source of funding for such off-site mitigation measures and was requested to initiate discussions with the appropriate Federal project operators and the Council to determine the most expeditious means for funding and implementing the program. The primary measures proposed for rapid implementation in the Yakima River basin were the installation of fish passage and protective facilities. Sec. 109 of The Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984, authorized the Secretary of the Interior to design, construct, operate, and maintain fish passage facilities within the Yakima River Basin. Under Phase I of the program, improvements to existing fish passage facilities and installation of new fish ladders and fish screens at 16 of the largest existing diversion dams and canals were begun in 1984 and were completed in 1990. The Yakima Phase II fish passage program is an extension of the Phase I program. In 1988, the Yakama Nation (YN) submitted an application to amend Sections 803(b) and 1403(4.5) of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program to begin preliminary design on the Phase II fish screen program. Based on citizen and agency endorsement, the Council approved the amendment in 1989. The Council authorized BPA to provide funding for Phase II screens through the Fish and Wildlife Program. BPA then asked the Bureau of Reclamation to provide engineering and design expertise to the Phase II projects.

Hudson, R. Dennis

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

Kitsap County  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Kitsap County Goals and Policies on Critical Areas........... 6 The BAS Process............................ 7

unknown authors

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

RECIPIENT:WA Department of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT Van Dyk Dairy Anaerobic Digester  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of5 of5 RECIPIENT:WA Department of Commerce STATE: WA PROJECT Van Dyk Dairy Anaerobic Digester TITLE: Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm Number DE-EE0000139 GF0-10-604 Based on my review oftbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA CompUance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the foUowing determination: cx, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and demand studies), and dissemination (including, but not limited to, document mailings, publication, and distribution;

171

Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility | National Nuclear Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility Hanford, WA Selected as Plutonium Production Facility January 16, 1943 Hanford, WA

172

Reproductive Ecology of Yakima River Hatchery and Wild Spring Chinook; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, 2005-2006 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report covers three of many topics under the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project's Monitoring and Evaluation Program (YKFPME) and was completed by Oncorh Consulting as a contract deliverable to the Yakama Nation and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. The YKFPME (Project Number 1995-063-25) is funded under two BPA contracts, one for the Yakama Nation (Contract No. 00022449) and the other for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (Contract No. 22370). A comprehensive summary report for all of the monitoring and evaluation topics will be submitted after all of the topical reports are completed. This approach to reporting enhances the ability of people to get the information they want, enhances timely reporting of results, and provides a condensed synthesis of the whole YKFPME.

Knedsen, Curtis M. (Oncorh Consulting, Olympia, WA); Schroder, Steven L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA); Johnston, Mark V. (Yakama Nation, Toppenish, WA)

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

WA_00_013_GENECOR_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_US_Competitiveness...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Publications WA01008NOVOZYMEBIOTECHWaiverofDomesticandForeignPa.pdf WA05006ABENGOABIOENERGYCORPORATIONWaiverofDomestica.pdf Class Patent Waiver W(C)2012-004...

174

WA_01-012_DETROIT_DIESEL_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Righ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-012DETROITDIESELWaiverofDomesticandForeignRigh.pdf WA01-012DETROITDIESELWaiverofDomesticandForeignRigh.pdf WA01-012DETROITDIESELWaiverofDomesticandForeign...

175

WA_1995_039_USABC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Rights_Unde...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ofDomesticandForeignRightsUnde.pdf More Documents & Publications WA1993032FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomesticandForeig.pdf WA97038FORDMOTORCOMPANYWaiverofDomes...

176

WA_01-016_FORD_MOTOR_CO_Waive_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Invent...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-016FORDMOTORCOWaiveofDomesticandForeignInvent.pdf WA01-016FORDMOTORCOWaiveofDomesticandForeignInvent.pdf WA01-016FORDMOTORCOWaiveofDomesticandForeign...

177

WA_02_009_CONSOL_ENERGY_Multi_Pollutant_Emissions_Control-CL...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

02009CONSOLENERGYMultiPollutantEmissionsControl-CL.pdf WA02009CONSOLENERGYMultiPollutantEmissionsControl-CL.pdf WA02009CONSOLENERGYMultiPollutantEmissionsCon...

178

WA_1993_034_CONSOLIDATED_NATURAL_GAS_(CNG)_Waiver_of_Domesti...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1993034CONSOLIDATEDNATURALGAS(CNG)WaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1993034CONSOLIDATEDNATURALGAS(CNG)WaiverofDomesti.pdf WA1993034CONSOLIDATEDNATURALGAS(CNG)Waiverof...

179

WA_02_032_DOW_CHEMICAL_CO_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Pat...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32DOWCHEMICALCOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPat.pdf WA02032DOWCHEMICALCOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPat.pdf WA02032DOWCHEMICALCOWaiverofDomesticandForeign...

180

WA_1993_007_DOW_CHEMICAL_COMPANY_Waiver_of_U.S._and_Foreign_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1993007DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofU.S.andForeign.pdf WA1993007DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofU.S.andForeign.pdf WA1993007DOWCHEMICALCOMPANYWaiverofU.S.andF...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

WA_03_046_INTERMAGNETICS_GENERAL_CORP_Waiver_of_Domestic_and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IGC-SUPERPOWERLLCWaiverofDomesticandForeign.pdf WA03028SUPERPOWERINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE.pdf WA99008DUPONTSUPERCONDUCTIVITYWaiverofUSandForeign...

182

WA_03_001_CHEVRON_TEXACO_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Pate...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01CHEVRONTEXACOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPate.pdf WA03001CHEVRONTEXACOWaiverofDomesticandForeignPate.pdf WA03001CHEVRONTEXACOWaiverofDomesticandForeignP...

183

WA_1993_043_DETROIT_DEISEL_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_U.S._and_Fo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

43DETROITDEISELCORPORATIONWaiverofU.S.andFo.pdf WA1993043DETROITDEISELCORPORATIONWaiverofU.S.andFo.pdf WA1993043DETROITDEISELCORPORATIONWaiverofU.S.andF...

184

WA_00_003_DUKE_SOLAR_ENERGY_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_P...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0003DUKESOLARENERGYWaiverofDomesticandForeignP.pdf WA00003DUKESOLARENERGYWaiverofDomesticandForeignP.pdf WA00003DUKESOLARENERGYWaiverofDomesticandFor...

185

Pages that link to "Category:Seattle, WA" | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Share this page on Facebook icon Twitter icon Pages that link to "Category:Seattle, WA" Category:Seattle, WA Jump to: navigation, search What links here Page:...

186

WA_01_002_CREE_LIGHTING_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Inven...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2CREELIGHTINGWaiverofDomesticandForeignInven.pdf WA01002CREELIGHTINGWaiverofDomesticandForeignInven.pdf WA01002CREELIGHTINGWaiverofDomesticandForeignInv...

187

WA_02_005_LUMILEDS_LIGHTING_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_I...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2005LUMILEDSLIGHTINGWaiverofDomesticandForeignI.pdf WA02005LUMILEDSLIGHTINGWaiverofDomesticandForeignI.pdf WA02005LUMILEDSLIGHTINGWaiverofDomesticandFor...

188

WA_1993_020_GENERAL_MOTORS_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Ri...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ORSWaiverofDomesticandForeignRi.pdf More Documents & Publications WA04020GENERALELECTRICWaiverofDomesticandForeignIn.pdf WA03019GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofDom...

189

WA_06_021_UTC_FUEL_CELLS_LLC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1UTCFUELCELLSLLCWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA06021UTCFUELCELLSLLCWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA06021UTCFUELCELLSLLCWaiverofPatentRightsUnder...

190

WA_02_039_SHELL_SOLAR_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

39SHELLSOLARSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA02039SHELLSOLARSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA02039SHELLSOLARSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRightsUnd...

191

WA_04_032_CARGILL_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_under_PLATFORM_CHE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CARGILLINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderACoopA.pdf WA04033CARGILLWaiverofPatentRightstoCARGILLDOWNL.pdf WA03032RWESCHOTTSOLARINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnder...

192

WA_03_032_RWE_SCHOTT_SOLAR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32RWESCHOTTSOLARINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03032RWESCHOTTSOLARINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03032RWESCHOTTSOLARINCWaiverofPatentRightsUn...

193

WA_06_016_BP_SOLAR_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Und...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6BPSOLARINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUnd.pdf WA06016BPSOLARINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUnd.pdf WA06016BPSOLARINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsU...

194

WA_05_061_CATERPILLAR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rihts_to_Inventio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRihtstoInventio.pdf WA05061CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRihtstoInventio.pdf WA05061CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRihtstoInven...

195

WA_04_007_OSHKOSH_TRUCK_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_N...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07OSHKOSHTRUCKCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderN.pdf WA04007OSHKOSHTRUCKCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderN.pdf WA04007OSHKOSHTRUCKCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnde...

196

WA_02_055_PRAXAIR_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Patent_Righ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA02055PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRi...

197

WA_04_067_CATRPILLAR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_Inventio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

67CATRPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventio.pdf WA04067CATRPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventio.pdf WA04067CATRPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInven...

198

WA_03_022_DELPHI_AUTO_SYSTEMS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_Inv...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2DELPHIAUTOSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRightstoInv.pdf WA03022DELPHIAUTOSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRightstoInv.pdf WA03022DELPHIAUTOSYSTEMSWaiverofPatentRightstoI...

199

WA_02_043_EMCORE_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_A_Subcon...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3EMCORECORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderASubcon.pdf WA02043EMCORECORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderASubcon.pdf WA02043EMCORECORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderASubc...

200

WA_02_051_AQUA_CHEM_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_A_Subc...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1AQUACHEMINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderASubc.pdf WA02051AQUACHEMINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderASubc.pdf WA02051AQUACHEMINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderASu...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

WA_00_008_PLUG_POWER_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_in_Performance_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0008PLUGPOWERWaiverofPatentRightsinPerformance.pdf WA00008PLUGPOWERWaiverofPatentRightsinPerformance.pdf WA00008PLUGPOWERWaiverofPatentRightsinPerfor...

202

WA_05_026_GE_NUCLEAR_ENERGY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6GENUCLEARENERGYWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA05026GENUCLEARENERGYWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA05026GENUCLEARENERGYWaiverofPatentRightsUnder...

203

WA_05_041_MACK_TRUCKS_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_Inventi...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1MACKTRUCKSINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA05041MACKTRUCKSINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA05041MACKTRUCKSINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInven...

204

WA_03_027_SUPERPOWER_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7SUPERPOWERINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE.pdf WA03027SUPERPOWERINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE.pdf WA03027SUPERPOWERINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaD...

205

WA_04_058_SOLUTIA_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE_Co...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8SOLUTIAINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOECo.pdf WA04058SOLUTIAINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOECo.pdf WA04058SOLUTIAINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE...

206

WA_04_031_ROHM_AND_HAAS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_under_NEW_SU...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31ROHMANDHAASWaiverofPatentRightsunderNEWSU.pdf WA04031ROHMANDHAASWaiverofPatentRightsunderNEWSU.pdf WA04031ROHMANDHAASWaiverofPatentRightsunderNEW...

207

WA_05_009_LUCENT_TECHNOLOGIES_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Un...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09LUCENTTECHNOLOGIESINCWaiverofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA05009LUCENTTECHNOLOGIESINCWaiverofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA05009LUCENTTECHNOLOGIESINCWaiverofPatentRights...

208

WA_04_061_ROHM_AND_HAAS_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Unde...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61ROHMANDHAASCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA04061ROHMANDHAASCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA04061ROHMANDHAASCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsU...

209

WA_06_009_UNIVERSITY_OF_MINNESOTA_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights--W...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9UNIVERSITYOFMINNESOTAWaiverofPatentRights--W.pdf WA06009UNIVERSITYOFMINNESOTAWaiverofPatentRights--W.pdf WA06009UNIVERSITYOFMINNESOTAWaiverofPatentRights-...

210

WA_02_047_SOUTHWIRE_CO_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_A_Coope...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2047SOUTHWIRECOWaiverofPatentRightsUnderACoope.pdf WA02047SOUTHWIRECOWaiverofPatentRightsUnderACoope.pdf WA02047SOUTHWIRECOWaiverofPatentRightsUnderA...

211

WA_04_064_VELOCYS_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rgiths_Under_a_DOE_Co...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

64VELOCYSINCWaiverofPatentRgithsUnderaDOECo.pdf WA04064VELOCYSINCWaiverofPatentRgithsUnderaDOECo.pdf WA04064VELOCYSINCWaiverofPatentRgithsUnderaDOE...

212

WA_00_031_HONEYWELL_Waiver_Domestic_and_Foreign_Patent_Right...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31HONEYWELLWaiverDomesticandForeignPatentRight.pdf WA00031HONEYWELLWaiverDomesticandForeignPatentRight.pdf WA00031HONEYWELLWaiverDomesticandForeignPatentRi...

213

WA_98_010_SOLAREX_Waiver_of_of_Patent_Rights_Under_an_NREL_S...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8010SOLAREXWaiverofofPatentRightsUnderanNRELS.pdf WA98010SOLAREXWaiverofofPatentRightsUnderanNRELS.pdf WA98010SOLAREXWaiverofofPatentRightsUnderan...

214

WA_07_020_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_CO_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0GENERALELECTRICCOWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA07020GENERALELECTRICCOWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA07020GENERALELECTRICCOWaiverofPatentRightsUnde...

215

WA_05_021_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA05021UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA05021UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnde...

216

WA_06_015_PPG_INDUSTRIES_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5PPGINDUSTRIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE.pdf WA06015PPGINDUSTRIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE.pdf WA06015PPGINDUSTRIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaD...

217

WA_04_029_UOP_LLC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_under_DISCOVERY_OF...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9UOPLLCWaiverofPatentRightsunderDISCOVERYOF.pdf WA04029UOPLLCWaiverofPatentRightsunderDISCOVERYOF.pdf WA04029UOPLLCWaiverofPatentRightsunderDISCOVERY...

218

WA_04_033_CARGILL_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_CARGILL_DOWN_L.pdf...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3CARGILLWaiverofPatentRightstoCARGILLDOWNL.pdf WA04033CARGILLWaiverofPatentRightstoCARGILLDOWNL.pdf WA04033CARGILLWaiverofPatentRightstoCARGILLDOWNL....

219

WA_03_004_CARGILL_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_A_Coop_A...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04CARGILLINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderACoopA.pdf WA03004CARGILLINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderACoopA.pdf WA03004CARGILLINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderACoo...

220

WA_04_047_CATERPILLAR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_Inventi...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA04047CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA04047CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInve...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

WA_04_044_GENERAL_MOTORS_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

44GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA04044GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA04044GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnd...

222

WA_05_027_WESTINGHOUSE_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_Subco...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7WESTINGHOUSEWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubco.pdf WA05027WESTINGHOUSEWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubco.pdf WA05027WESTINGHOUSEWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSub...

223

WA_04_037_VELOCCYS_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE_C...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

37VELOCCYSINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOEC.pdf WA04037VELOCCYSINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOEC.pdf WA04037VELOCCYSINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDO...

224

WA_99_012_AIR_PRODUCTS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_AN_NVO_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9012AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderANNVO.pdf WA99012AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderANNVO.pdf WA99012AIRPRODUCTSWaiverofPatentRightsUnderA...

225

WA_03_002_3M_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_A_DOE_Coo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30023MCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnderADOECoo.pdf WA030023MCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnderADOECoo.pdf WA030023MCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnderAD...

226

WA_04_038_3M_COMPANY__Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE_Co...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

83MCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOECo.pdf WA040383MCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOECo.pdf WA040383MCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE...

227

WA_07_001_EASTMAN_KODAK_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Unde...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01EASTMANKODAKCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA07001EASTMANKODAKCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA07001EASTMANKODAKCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsU...

228

WA_04_071_CATERPILLAR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_Inventi...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA04071CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA04071CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInven...

229

WA_03_031_UNITED_TECHNOLOGIES_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3031UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03031UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03031UNITEDTECHNOLOGIESWaiverofPatentRights...

230

WA_04_081_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_U...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsU.pdf WA04081GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsU.pdf WA04081GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRights...

231

WA_06_026_CREE_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_Subcontra...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6CREEINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcontra.pdf WA06026CREEINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcontra.pdf WA06026CREEINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcont...

232

WA_03_028_SUPERPOWER_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8SUPERPOWERINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE.pdf WA03028SUPERPOWERINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOE.pdf WA03028SUPERPOWERINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaD...

233

WA_01_030_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_CO_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0GENERALELECTRICCOWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA01030GENERALELECTRICCOWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA01030GENERALELECTRICCOWaiverofPatentRightsUnde...

234

WA_02_048_EATON_CORPORATION_Waviver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_A...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2048EATONCORPORATIONWaviverofPatentRightsUnderA.pdf WA02048EATONCORPORATIONWaviverofPatentRightsUnderA.pdf WA02048EATONCORPORATIONWaviverofPatentRightsU...

235

WA_00_009_ARTHUR_D_LITTLE_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_in_Perform...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9ARTHURDLITTLEWaiverofPatentRightsinPerform.pdf WA00009ARTHURDLITTLEWaiverofPatentRightsinPerform.pdf WA00009ARTHURDLITTLEWaiverofPatentRightsinPerfo...

236

WA_05_052_CATERPILLAR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_to_Inventi...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

52CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA05052CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInventi.pdf WA05052CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightstoInve...

237

WA_02_029_CUMMINS_ENGINE_CO_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_DO...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29CUMMINSENGINECOWaiverofPatentRightsUnderDO.pdf WA02029CUMMINSENGINECOWaiverofPatentRightsUnderDO.pdf WA02029CUMMINSENGINECOWaiverofPatentRightsUnder...

238

WA_04_011_KENNAMETAL_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_Subco...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11KENNAMETALINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderSubco.pdf WA04011KENNAMETALINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderSubco.pdf WA04011KENNAMETALINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderSu...

239

WA_06_027_EASTMAN_KODAK_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Unde...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7EASTMANKODAKCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA06027EASTMANKODAKCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA06027EASTMANKODAKCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUn...

240

WA_2006_007_SOLVEY_OLEXIS_SpA_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2006007SOLVEYOLEXISSpAWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA2006007SOLVEYOLEXISSpAWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA2006007SOLVEYOLEXISSpAWaiverofPatentRights...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

WA_06_014_PPG_INDUSTRIES_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4PPGINDUSTRIESINCWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA06014PPGINDUSTRIESINCWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA06014PPGINDUSTRIESINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnder...

242

WA_05_030_BOC_GROUP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DOE_Co-O...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0BOCGROUPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOECo-O.pdf WA05030BOCGROUPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOECo-O.pdf WA05030BOCGROUPWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDOECo...

243

WA_04_008_GENERAL_MOTORS_CORP_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA04008GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA04008GENERALMOTORSCORPWaiverofPatentRightsUnd...

244

WA_04_016_MACK_TRUCKS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_under_NREL_Sub...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16MACKTRUCKSWaiverofPatentRightsunderNRELSub.pdf WA04016MACKTRUCKSWaiverofPatentRightsunderNRELSub.pdf WA04016MACKTRUCKSWaiverofPatentRightsunderNREL...

245

WA_03_035_CATERPILLAR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_DO...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3035CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDO.pdf WA03035CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaDO.pdf WA03035CATERPILLARINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnde...

246

WA_04_079_PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_Subcon...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

79PRAXAIRINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcon.pdf WA04079PRAXAIRINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubcon.pdf WA04079PRAXAIRINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSub...

247

WA_00_020_PRAXAIR_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Patent_Righ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA00020PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA00020PRAXAIRWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentR...

248

WA_04_062_ROHM_AND_HAAS_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Unde...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2ROHMANDHAASCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA04062ROHMANDHAASCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUnde.pdf WA04062ROHMANDHAASCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsUn...

249

WA_04_039_HONEYWELL_INTERNATIONAL_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Un...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA04039HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA04039HONEYWELLINTERNATIONALWaiverofPatentRights...

250

WA_06_018_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_COMPANY_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_U...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsU.pdf WA06018GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRightsU.pdf WA06018GENERALELECTRICCOMPANYWaiverofPatentRights...

251

WA_01_039_PRAXAIR_INC_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Patent_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatent.pdf WA01039PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatent.pdf WA01039PRAXAIRINCWaiverofDomesticandForeignPaten...

252

WA_03_026_EI_DUPONT_DENEMOURS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26EIDUPONTDENEMOURSWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03026EIDUPONTDENEMOURSWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03026EIDUPONTDENEMOURSWaiverofPatentRightsUnd...

253

WA_04_027_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_for_DISTR...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7GENERALELECTRICWaiverofPatentRightsforDISTR.pdf WA04027GENERALELECTRICWaiverofPatentRightsforDISTR.pdf WA04027GENERALELECTRICWaiverofPatentRightsforDIS...

254

WA_02_033_GENERAL_ELECTRIC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

33GENERALELECTRICWaiverofPatentRightsUnderDOE.pdf WA02033GENERALELECTRICWaiverofPatentRightsUnderDOE.pdf WA02033GENERALELECTRICWaiverofPatentRightsUnder...

255

WA_06_020_ARIZONA_PUBLIC_SERVICE_Waivier_of_Patent_Rights_Un...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0ARIZONAPUBLICSERVICEWaivierofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA06020ARIZONAPUBLICSERVICEWaivierofPatentRightsUn.pdf WA06020ARIZONAPUBLICSERVICEWaivierofPatentRights...

256

WA_06_029_GENSCAPE_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_Subco...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9GENSCAPEINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubco.pdf WA06029GENSCAPEINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSubco.pdf WA06029GENSCAPEINCWaiverofPatentRightsUnderaSub...

257

WA_98_007_SOLAREX_Waiver_of_Domestic_and_Foreign_Patent_Righ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7SOLAREXWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA98007SOLAREXWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRigh.pdf WA98007SOLAREXWaiverofDomesticandForeignPatentRi...

258

WA_03_011_ROCKWELL_AUTOMATION_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUnder.pdf WA03011ROCKWELLAUTOMATIONWaiverofPatentRights...

259

WA_04_059_EATON_CORPORATION_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_Under_a_...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9EATONCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA04059EATONCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUndera.pdf WA04059EATONCORPORATIONWaiverofPatentRightsUnder...

260

WA_06_013_McDERMOTT_TECHNOLOGY_INC_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_t...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3McDERMOTTTECHNOLOGYINCWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA06013McDERMOTTTECHNOLOGYINCWaiverofPatentRightst.pdf WA06013McDERMOTTTECHNOLOGYINCWaiverofPatentRights...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

WA_02_030_OXFORD_INSTRUMENTS_Waiver_of_Patent_Rights_under_D...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30OXFORDINSTRUMENTSWaiverofPatentRightsunderD.pdf WA02030OXFORDINSTRUMENTSWaiverofPatentRightsunderD.pdf WA02030OXFORDINSTRUMENTSWaiverofPatentRightsunde...

262

WA_1993_038_TEXAS_INSTRUMENTS_INC_Waiver_of_U.S._and_Foreign...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8TEXASINSTRUMENTSINCWaiverofU.S.andForeign.pdf WA1993038TEXASINSTRUMENTSINCWaiverofU.S.andForeign.pdf WA1993038TEXASINSTRUMENTSINCWaiverofU.S.andForeign...

263

W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W.A. W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary February 2013 DOE/EIS-0473 Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COVER SHEET Responsible Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Title: W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473) Location: Southeastern Texas, including Fort Bend, Wharton, and Jackson counties Contacts: For further information about this Environmental Impact Statement, contact: For general information on the DOE process for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, contact: Mark W. Lusk U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory 3610 Collins Ferry Road Morgantown, WV 26507-0880 (304) 285-4145 or Mark.Lusk@netl.doe.gov

264

W(A)94-022 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

W(A)94-022 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Cummins Power Generation, Inc., for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Patent Rights to Inventions made under a contract...

265

BayWa Sunways JV | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

JV that specialises in developing, planning and realizing medium-sized to large photovoltaic systems and solar plants. References BayWa & Sunways JV1 LinkedIn Connections...

266

Isotopic Studies of Contaminant Transport at the Hanford Site, WA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MR-0132. Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland WA. Bretz,in recharge at the Hanford Site. Northwest Science. 66:237-M.J. , ed. 2000. Hanford Site groundwater Monitoring

Christensen, J.N.; Conrad, M.E.; DePaolo, D.J.; Dresel, P.E.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

Fort Lewis, Yakima Firing Center, and Vancouver Barracks/Camp Bonneville basewide energy use plan; executive summary. Final report  

SciTech Connect

This Executive Summary presents an overview of a series of studies, mostly energy related, of Fort Lewis, Yakima Firing Center, Vancouver Barracks, and Camp Bonneville. Collectively, the work is known as the Basewide Energy Use Plan and is a part of the Energy Conservation Investment Program (ECIP).

Smiley, D.P.

1984-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Reestablish Safe Access into Tributaries of the Yakima Subbasin, Progress Report 2002-2003.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Safe Access work has concentrated on the lower portions of five drainages in the Upper Yakima Basin. Streams in the Kittitas Valley include Wilson Creek, Naneum and Little Naneum Creeks, Reecer and Currier Creeks, and Manastash Creek. Tucker Creek is tributary to the Yakima River near Easton, Washington to the northwest. For numerous reasons delays in project implementation have occurred. Unclear water rights have resulted in long delays; however, permitting delays, general landowner reluctance to commit to any deviation from past practices, and lengthy legal review have all been factors. Realistic work windows are short and do not coincide well with fiscal year planning and contract renewals. The following is a summary of the projects anticipated under Safe Access that the Yakama Nation thought would be funded by BPA via carry-forward/over monies. Preparatory work toward construction in 03 was done for projects in the Wilson, Naneum and Tucker Creek systems; feasibility studies were done in the Manastash and Reecer systems by Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH) relative to screening and passage options and associated costs.

Fraser, Hank

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Microsoft Word - CX-AccessRoads-KingCoWA-FY13_WEB.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2013 22, 2013 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-Covington SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Rick Ross Engineer - TELF-TPP-3 Proposed Action: Covington District Culvert Replacements Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): Appendix B1.3, Routine Maintenance Location: King County, WA Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to replace existing culverts at 12 access road stream crossings that present barriers to fish passage. These improvements will be made on BPA easement access roads within DNR owned and managed lands. BPA will make these improvements by installing new fish friendly culverts and/or bridges at each stream crossing. The current stream crossings do not meet DNR fish passage standards that will be in

270

Velocity Measurements at Three Fish Screening Facilities in the Yakima Basin, Washington : Summer 1989 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) measured the velocity conditions at three fish screening facilities in the Yakima River Basin: Wapato, Chandler, and Easton Screens. The measurement objectives were different at the three screens. At Wapato, approach and sweep velocities were measured to evaluate the effect of rearing pens in the screen forebay. A complete survey was performed at the Chandler Screens. At Easton, velocity was measured behind the screens to provide information for the installation of porosity boards to balance flow through the screens. Salmon-rearing pens used at the Wapato Canal had a minimal effect on the magnitude of approach and sweep velocities at the face of the drum screens, although the pens caused increased turbulence and variability in water velocities. The net pens did not appear to affect flows through the three fish bypasses. 8 refs., 17 figs., 5 tabs.

Abernethy, C. Scott; Neitzel, Duane A.; Lusty, E. William

1990-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project. Final Environmental Assessment.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) proposes to fund that portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to the Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Project (Project) in a cooperative effort with the Yakama Indian Nation and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). The proposed action would allow the sponsors to secure property and conduct wildlife management activities for the Project within the boundaries of the Yakama Indian Reservation. This Environmental Assessment examines the potential environmental effects of acquiring and managing property for wildlife and wildlife habitat within a large 20, 340 hectare (50, 308 acre) project area. As individual properties are secured for the Project, three site-specific activities (habitat enhancement, operation and maintenance, and monitoring and evaluation) may be subject to further site-specific environmental review. All required Federal/Tribal coordination, permits and/or approvals would be obtained prior to ground disturbing activities.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Klickitat Monitoring and Evaluation, 2007 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report describes the results of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities for salmonid fish populations and habitat in the Klickitat River subbasin in south-central Washington. The M&E activities described here were conducted as a part of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)-funded Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) and were designed by consensus of the scientists with the Yakama Nation (YN) Fisheries Program. YKFP is a joint project between YN and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Overall YKFP goals are to increase natural production of and opportunity to harvest salmon and steelhead in the Yakima and Klickitat subbasins using hatchery supplementation, harvest augmentation and habitat improvements. Klickitat subbasin M&E activities have been subjected to scientific and technical review by members of the YKFP Science/Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) as part of the YKFP's overall M&E proposal. Yakama Nation YKFP biologists have transformed the conceptual design into the tasks described. YKFP biologists have also been involved with the Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP - a project aimed at improving the quality, consistency, and focus of fish population and habitat data to answer key M&E questions relevant to major decisions in the Columbia Basin) and are working towards keeping Klickitat M&E activities consistent with CSMEP recommendations. This report summarizes progress and results for the following major categories of YN-managed tasks under this contract: (1) Monitoring and Evaluation - to gather baseline information in order to characterize habitat and salmonid populations pre- and post-habitat restoration and pre-supplementation. (2) Ecological Interactions - to determine presence of pathogens in wild and naturally produced salmonids in the Klickitat Basin and develop supplementation strategies using this information. (3) Genetics - to develop YKFP supplementation broodstock collection protocols for the preservation of genetic variability, by refining methods of detecting within-stock genetic variability and between-stock genetic variability.

Zendt, Joe; Babcock, Mike [Yakama Nation Fisheries Resource Management

2006-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

273

Velocity Measurements at Six Fish Screening Facilities in the Yakima River Basin, Washington, Summer 1988 : Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USSR), and the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE) are funding the construction and evaluation of fish passage facilities and fish protection facilities at irrigation and hydroelectric diversions in the Yakima River Basin, Washington State. The program provides offsite enhancement to compensate for fish and wildlife losses caused by hydroelectric development throughout the Columbia River Basin, and addresses natural propagation of salmon to help mitigate the impact of irrigation in the Yakima River Basin. This report evaluates the flow characteristics of the screening facilities. Studies consisted of velocity measurements taken in front of the rotary drum screens and within the fish bypass systems during peak flows. Measurements of approach velocity and sweep velocity were emphasized in these studies; however, vertical velocity was also measured. 5 refs., 18 figs., 15 tabs.

Abernethy, C. Scott; Neitzel, Duane A.; Lusty, E. William

1989-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Pit-Tag Studies with Juvenile Salmonids at the Chandler Canal Fish Collection Facility, Yakima River : Annual Report 1990.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Juvenile salmonid survival studies planned for the Yakima Basin will require the release and recapture of large numbers of marked fish. Before these studies can be implemented, information is needed about potential recovery rates of marked fish at proposed sampling sites. The type of mark employed and the efficiency of the equipment used to capture and examine fish for marks must be evaluated since accurate survival estimates depend on their reliability. Recovery rates are expected to vary with species and life stage as well as environmental factors such as river flow and water temperature. The purpose of this study was to assess the mark-recovery capabilities of the Chandler facility and a mobile juvenile fish trap installed temporarily at West Richland, Washington near the mouth of the Yakima River.

Ruehle, Thomas E.; McCutcheon, Clinton Scott

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Microsoft Word - PI_NEPA-CX_KittitasCountyCEAcquisition.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2010 2, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Sandra Fife Project Manager - KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) would provide funds to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for the purchase of a conservation easement on 432.3 acres of the Hundley property for fish habitat mitigation in Kittitas County, Washington. BPA would hold a conservation easement on the property and the easement would be protected and co-managed by WDFW, the Yakama Nation's Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) and the Kittitas Conservation Trust (KCT). Budget Information: Work Order #00191727 Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 1997-051-00, BPA-004607 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021):

276

WA S C2 0 01 Handbook of  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

WA S C2 0 01 Handbook of Accreditation #12;The Western Association of Schools and Colleges be terminated, or when the Commission formally acts to terminate accreditation. This Handbook of Accreditation associations and related bodies, see pages 118­119. #12;HANDBOOK OF ACCREDITATION Standards Addressing Core

California at Santa Cruz, University of

277

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Washington - WA 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington - WA 0-01 Washington - WA 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON (WA.0-01) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Seattle , Washington WA.0-01-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 WA.0-01-1 Site Operations: Research activities involving small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment. WA.0-01-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for residual radioactive contamination considered remote - Operating under active NRC license WA.0-01-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated WA.0-01-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see

278

WA_06_017_Waiver_of_The_Govt_US_and_Foreign_Patent_Rights_fo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7WaiverofTheGovtUSandForeignPatentRightsfo.pdf WA06017WaiverofTheGovtUSandForeignPatentRightsfo.pdf WA06017WaiverofTheGovtUSandForeignPatentRights...

279

File:INL-geothermal-wa.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

wa.pdf wa.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Washington Geothermal Resources Size of this preview: 699 × 600 pixels. Full resolution ‎(4,835 × 4,147 pixels, file size: 3.28 MB, MIME type: application/pdf) Description Washington Geothermal Resources Sources Idaho National Laboratory Authors Patrick Laney; Julie Brizzee Related Technologies Geothermal Creation Date 2003-11-01 Extent State Countries United States UN Region Northern America States Washington File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 12:45, 16 December 2010 Thumbnail for version as of 12:45, 16 December 2010 4,835 × 4,147 (3.28 MB) MapBot (Talk | contribs) Automated upload from NREL's "mapsearch" data

280

Cook County- LEED Requirements for County Buildings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

In 2002, Cook County enacted an ordinance requiring all new county buildings and all retrofitted county buildings to be built to LEED standards. Specifically, all newly constructed buildings and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Long-billed curlews on the Yakima Training Center: Information for base realignment  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes and discusses the results obtained during 1992 from the study of long-billed curlews on the Yakima Training Center (YTC), which Pacific Northwest Laboratory conducted for the US Department of the Army. This study was initiated to provide basic ecological information on YTC long-billed curlews (Numenius americanus). The long-billed curlew is a relatively common spring and summer resident on the YTC. However, other than casual observations, very little is known about the distribution, density, reproductive success, and habitat requirements for this species on the YTC. Until recently the long-billed curlew was a US Fish and Wildlife Service candidate for listing as threatened or endangered; however, on November 21, 1991 it was down-listed to Class IIIc. The Washington Department of Wildlife lists the long-billed curlew as a ``species of special concern.`` Specific objectives of this study were to (1) locate nesting areas, (2) locate brood-rearing areas, (3) evaluate habitat requirements, (4) determine diet, (5) evaluate response to troop activities, (6) evaluate the impact of livestock grazing, (7) estimate the population size, and (8) estimate recruitment rates. Six curlews (four females and two males) were captured and fitted with radio transmitters. These birds were relocated to obtain nesting, habitat use, and feeding information. Road surveys conducted over most of the YTC provided information on the bird`s general distribution, habitat requirements, and nesting and brood-rearing areas.

Hand, K.D.; Cadwell, L.L.; Eberhardt, L.E.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Irrigation Depletions 1928-1989 : 1990 Level of Irrigation, Snake Yakima and Deschutes River Basins.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The vast amount of irrigation in relation to the available water and extensive system of reservoirs located in the Snake River Basin above Brownlee reservoir precludes this area from using methods such as Blaney-Criddle for estimating irrigation depletions. Also the hydrology, irrigation growth patterns, and water supply problems are unique and complex. Therefore regulation studies were utilized to reflect the net effect on streamflow of the changes in irrigated acreage in terms of corresponding changes in storage regulation and in the amount of water depleted and diverted from and returned to the river system. The regulation study for 1990 conditions was conducted by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The end product of the basin simulation is 61 years of regulated flows at various points in the river system that are based on 1990 conditions. Data used by the Idaho Department of Water Resources is presented in this section and includes natural gains to the river system and diversions from the river system based on a 1990 level of development and operation criteria. Additional information can be obtained for an Idaho Department of Water Resources Open-File Report ``Stream Flows in the Snake River Basin 1989 Conditions of Use and Management`` dated June 1991. Similar considerations apply to the Yakima and Deschutes river basins.

United States. Bonneville Power Administation; A.G. Crook Company

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 2002 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 2002, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory evaluated 23 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met National Marine Fisheries Service criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage and whether bypass outfall conditions allowed fish to safely return to the river. In addition, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2002, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by the National Marine Fisheries Service. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to increase safe juvenile fish passage. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well greased and operative. (5) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris should be improved at some sites.

Carter, J.; McMichael, G.; Chamness, M. (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 2003 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 2003, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 23 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS]) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2003, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by the NOAA Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve juvenile fish passage conditions. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well greased and operative. (5) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites.

Vucelick, J.; McMichael, G.; Chamness, M. (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Geothermal Development and Resource Management in the Yakima Valley : A Guidebook for Local Governments.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The guidebook defines the barriers to geothermal energy development at all levels of government and proposes ways to overcome these various barriers. In recognition that wholesale development of the region's geothermal resources could create a series of environmental problems and possible conflicts between groundwater users, resource management options are identified as possible ways to ensure the quality and quantity of the resource for future generations. It is important for local governments to get beyond the discussion of the merits of geothermal energy and take positive actions to develop or to encourage the development of the resource. To this end, several sources of technical and financial assistance are described. These sources of assistance can enable local governments and others to take action should they choose to do so. Even though the Yakima Valley is the setting for the analysis of local issues that could hamper geothermal development, this guidebook could be used by any locale with geothermal energy resources. The guidebook is not a scientific manual, but rather a policy document written especially for local government staff and officials who do not have technical backgrounds in geology or hydrology.

Creager, Kurt

1984-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

286

Counties | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Counties Counties Data Apps Challenges Policies Counties Welcome to Counties.Data.gov Bridging information from across the United States. Look at the data, use the apps, join the...

287

GRR/Section 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

5-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit 5-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies WAC 173-400-110 WAC 173-400-111 WAC 173-400-171 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process for obtaining an Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit. The Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) oversees the permitting process under WAC 173-400. 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf 15-WA-a - Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit.pdf

288

Ecological baseline study of the Yakima Firing Center proposed land acquisition: A Preliminary Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A baseline census was conducted from October 1987 to Janurary 1988 on the property identified for possible expansion of the Yakima Firing Center. These studies provide general descriptions of the major plant communities presentand animal inhabitants during the late fall and winter study period. A vegetation map derived from a combination of onsite surveillance and remotely sensed imagery is also provided as part of this report. Through January 1988, 13 wildlife species of special interest to state and federal agencies, in addition to ducks and geese, were observed on the proposed expansion area. Then raptorial bird species were observed in the area, including bald eagles, golden eagles, and prairie falcons. Upland game bird species, such as sage grouse, California quail, chuckars, and gray (Hungarian) partridge were present. Loggerhead shrikes, a species of special interest, were also observed on the site. Estimates of waterfowl abundance are included for the Priest Rapids Pool of the Columbia River, which includes the proposed river crossing sites. The number of waterfowl on the proposed crossing areas were comparatively low during the winter of 1986 to 1987 and high in 1987 to 1988. Bald eagles ad common loons were observed on the crossing areas. Six small mammal species were captured during this study period;one, the sagebrush vole, is a species of special interest. Two large animal species, mule deer and elk, were noted on the site. Beaver were the only furbearig animals noted to date. Rainbow trout were the only fish species collected within the proposed northern expansion area. The distribution of fall chinook salmon spawning areas was documented within the proposed river crossing areas. 3 refs., 7 figs., 3 tabs.

Rogers, L.E.; Beedlow, P.A.; Eberhardt, L.E.; Dauble, D.D.; Fitzner, R.E.

1988-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Microsoft Word - SA-06-EIS-0169-Holmes Coho site.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: March 12, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, (DOE/EIS-0169-SA-06) David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project - Under the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (M&E), the coho acclimation research task would be modified to include a new site located in the Upper Yakima north of Ellensburg, WA. Project No.: F3204 Location: Ellensburg, Kittitas County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Yakima Fisheries Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (YFP EIS) (USDOE/BPA 1996) analyzed impacts of undertaking fishery research and mitigation

290

GRR/Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review GRR/Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified Once the lead agency is determined they are responsible for continuing forward with environmental review. In Washington, environmental review is effectuated through the developer completing an Environmental Checklist which assists the lead agency in determining whether the proposal will likely result in negative impacts on the environment. 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review.pdf 9-WA-b - State Environmental Review.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

291

EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA analyzes the potential environmental effects of a proposal by the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snowhomish County, Washington to construct and operate the Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project. The proposed 680-kilowatt project would be located on the east side of Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, Washington, about 1 kilometer west of Whidbey Island, entirely within Island County, Washington. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the lead agency. DOE is a cooperating agency.

292

EIS-0169-SA-08: Supplement Analysis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington

293

W(A)93-013 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13 13 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by AlliedSignal, Inc. for Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Patent Rights to inventions that may arise under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94462 between the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and AlliedSignal, Inc. DOE Docket: W(A)93-013 The Petitioner, AlliedSignal, Inc. (AlliedSignal), has requested a waiver of all domestic and foreign patent rights to inventions which it may conceive or reduce to practice in the course of work under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94462, a Cooperative Agreement with DOE. The project period is May 14, 1993 through May 13, 1996. The Cooperative Agreement covers work in designing a biological/chemical production process for caprolactam using microbial bioprocesses that convert cyclohexane to

294

W(A)93-039 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

39 39 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Patent Rights to inventions that may arise under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94461 between the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. DOE Docket: W(A)93-039. The Petitioner, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., (Air Products) has requested a waiver of all domestic and foreign patent rights to inventions which it may conceive or reduce to practice in the course of work under Contract No. DE-FC04-93AL94461 a Cooperative Agreement with DOE. The contract covers a four phase development program for a recently patented technology developed at Air Products entitled "Novel Selective Surface Flow (SSF T ) Membranes for the

295

W(A)94-022 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-022 4-022 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS Request by Cummins Power Generation, Inc., for an Advance Waiver of Domestic and Foreign Patent Rights to Inventions made under a contract entitled "Utility Scale Joint Venture Project," between Cummins Power Generation, Inc. and Sandia National Laboratories (Contract No. AB- 8717B) under Management and Operations Contract DE-AL04-84AL85000, DOE Docket No. W(A)94-022. The petitioner, Cummins Power Generation, Inc., (CPG) has requested a waiver of all domestic and foreign patent rights to inventions which it may conceive or first actually reduce to practice in the course of work under the Utility Scale Joint Venture Project between Petitioner and Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia) under contract No. AB- 8717B. Sandia is operated by Sandia Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

296

GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Regulations & Policies WAC 232-12-064 Triggers None specified In Washington, it is unlawful to take wildlife from the wild without permission from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The WDFW issues Live Wildlife Taking Permits under WAC 232-12-064. 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

297

Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) June 12, 2013 DOE referred the matter of Fisher & Paykel Appliances residential clothes washer, model WA42T26GW1, to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, brand manager for the ENERGY STAR Program, for appropriate action after DOE testing showed that the model does not meet the ENERGY STAR specification. Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1) More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI DOE response to questions from AHAM on the supplemental proposed test procedure for residential clothes washers Scoping Study to Evaluate Feasibility of National Databases for EM&V Documents and Measure Savings: Appendices

298

GRR/Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview GRR/Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Triggers None specified Any developer that needs access to or through state lands must obtain the appropriate permit or lease. The developer will obtain such permit or lease through the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 3-WA-b - Land Access Overview.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative

299

A summary of 22 Years of Fish Screen Evaluation in the Yakima River Basin, Summary Report 1985-2007.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Sixty fish screen facilities were constructed in the Yakima River basin between 1985 and 2006 as part of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council plan to mitigate the effects of federal hydroelectric projects on fish and wildlife populations. This report summarizes evaluations of some of those and other fish screen facilities conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) from 1985 through 2006. The objective of these studies was to determine if the newly designed and constructed fish screens were effective at providing juvenile salmonids safe passage past irrigation diversions. To answer that question, PNNL conducted release-and-catch studies at eight Phase I sites in the Yakima River basin. Increasing concerns about the impacts of hatchery fish releases on the wild fish population, as well as the cost and time necessary to perform these kinds of biological studies at more than 60 planned Phase II sites, required development of techniques to evaluate the effectiveness of the sites without releasing fish. The new techniques involved collecting information on screen design, operation, and effectiveness at guiding fish safely through the fish screen facility. Performance measures including water velocities and passage conditions provide a good alternative to biological studies at significantly lower cost and time. Physical techniques were used at all 10 Phase I and 28 Phase II sites evaluated by PNNL over the following 19 years. Results of these studies indicate the Phase I and II fish screen facilities are designed and capable of providing safe passage for juvenile salmonids so long as construction, maintenance, and operations meet the criteria used in the design of each site and the National Marine Fisheries Service criteria for juvenile fish screen design.

Chamness, Mickie A. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

2007-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

300

Dorchester County- Renewable Zoning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Dorchester County zoning codes specifically permit solar arrays and small wind turbines in many zoning districts.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Microbial community changes during sustained Cr(VI) reduction at the 100H site in Hanford, WA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at the 100H site in Hanford, WA Romy Chakraborty 1 , Eoin Lcontaminated aquifer at the Hanford (WA) 100H site in 2004.Cr(VI) reduction at Hanford, and a comparison of the

Chakraborty, Romy

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 1997 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory evaluated 19 Phase II screen sites in the Yakima River Basin at least three times each between April 30 and August 22, 1997. The sites were examined to determine if they were being effectively operated and maintained to provide fish a safe, efficient return to the river. Data were collected to determine if velocities in front of the screens and in the bypass met current NMFS criteria and promoted timely fish bypass, if fish were protected from injury due to impingement, entrainment, and predation, and whether bypass outfall conditions allowed fish to safely return to the river. A bi-directional flow meter and underwater video system were essential in completing the investigation. In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites were acceptable by NMFS standards. High approach velocities and slow bypass flow were the most common problems noted. Although velocities often fluctuated from one sampling location to the next, average sweep and approach velocities were very good. In general, fish should not be impinged or experience delays in returning to the river under normal operating conditions. Most screens were properly sealed to prevent fish entrainment and injury, although potential problems were identified at several screen sites. Three sites had gap openings from the forebay to the aftbay, allowing fish to be entrained. Other sites had spaces larger than 3/32 inch where small fish could become trapped. Some drum screens had flat spots but these were not been confirmed as underwater gaps, primarily because of siltation. On rare occasions, seals were intact, but cracked or turned under. Submergence levels at the drum screen sites exceeded 85% for one third of our evaluations. Eight of 12 drum screen sites experienced high water levels during at least one evaluation. Only one operating site's submergence was measured at less than 65% submergence. Two flat plate screen sites were completely overtopped with water during one evaluation each. Although 1997 was an extreme high-water year, these overtopping events point out that some screens do not completely protect fish under the full range of potential operating conditions. Water depths at the outfall pipe were acceptable at all but four sites. Generally, water depths were low near the end of the irrigation season due to low river flows. Rock removal around the outfall pipe or pipe extension would improve the situation. We gauged the potential for predation by qualitatively measuring the types and amount of cover provided for predators in front of the screens and by recording random observations of fish large enough to be considered predators in the forebay. Predation was more likely to occur at drum screen sites than at flat plate screen sites. Drum sites provide more predator hiding places because greater amounts of woody debris accumulate under the drums and against the concrete walls that divide one screen bay from the next. Four sites had both woody debris and large fish present. These four sites were considered most likely to experience juvenile salmonid loss to predation. Periodic removal of woody debris from underneath the curvature of drum screens would decrease the likelihood of predation at these sites. Screens were generally well maintained. Automated cleaning brushes functioned properly, chains and other moving parts were well greased, and inoperative and algae-covered drum screens were eventually repaired and cleaned. However, removal of sediment build-up and accumulated woody debris are areas where improvement should be considered. Maintenance checks should include observation of bypass outfalls on a regular basis, as conditions at the end of the bypass pipe are likely to change seasonally, especially in streams with high gradients or unstable gravel. Post-season evaluations were conducted at 11 sites in November to try and confirm seal and drum screen defects, and locations of excessive sedimentation. This proved effective in several cases, but the winterization process eliminated some of the evidence. Severa

Blanton, S.; Neitzel, C.; Abernethy, C. (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Optimal Conventional and Semi-Natural Treatments for the Upper Yakima Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Project; Treatment Definitions and Descriptions and Biological Specifications for Facility Design, 1995-1999 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report describes the Yakima Fisheries Project facilities (Cle Elum Hatchery and acclimation satellites) which provide the mechanism to conduct state-of-the-art research for addressing questions about spring chinook supplementation strategies. The definition, descriptions, and specifications for the Yakima spring chinook supplementation program permit evaluation of alternative fish culture techniques that should yield improved methods and procedures to produce wild-like fish with higher survival that can be used to rebuild depleted spring chinook stocks of the Columbia River Basin. The definition and description of three experimental treatments, Optimal Conventional (OCT), Semi-Natural (SNT), Limited Semi-Natural (LSNT), and the biological specifications for facilities have been completed for the upper Yakima spring chinook salmon stock of the Yakima Fisheries Project. The task was performed by the Biological Specifications Work Group (BSWG) represented by Yakama Indian Nation, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, and Bonneville Power Administration. The control and experimental variables of the experimental treatments (OCT, SNT, and LSNT) are described in sufficient detail to assure that the fish culture facilities will be designed and operated as a production scale laboratory to produce and test supplemented upper Yakima spring chinook salmon. Product specifications of the treatment groups are proposed to serve as the generic templates for developing greater specificity for measurements of product attributes. These product specifications will be used to monitor and evaluate treatment effects, with respect to the biological response variables (post release survival, long-term fitness, reproductive success and ecological interactions).

Hager, Robert C. (Hatchery Operations Consulting); Costello, Ronald J. (Mobrand Biometrics, Inc., Vashon Island, WA)

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

GRR/Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process GRR/Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 4-WA-a - State Exploration Process 4-WA-a State Exploration Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies Geothermal Act 78.60 RCW Geothermal Rules 332-17 WAC Triggers None specified Geothermal exploration in Washington requires a Geothermal Exploration Permit from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR) for invasive exploration or drilling. Operations that require an exploration or drilling permit will also require the developer to initiate the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). In Washington geothermal resources are regulated under Chapter 78.60 RCW

305

GRR/Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease GRR/Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-d - State Land Lease 3-WA-d - State Land Lease.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies RCW 79-13-020 RCW 79-13-140 RCW 79-13-150 WAC 332-22-030 WAC 332-22-105 WAC 332-22-110 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process used to lease state lands in Washington. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR) oversees the land leasing process through the Commissioner of Public Lands ("commissioner"). The WSDNR may lease state lands for purposes it deems advisable, including commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural, and

306

GRR/Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process GRR/Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process 3-WA-c - Utility Franchise or Permit Process (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Transportation Regulations & Policies WAC 468-34-060 WAC 468-34-080 WAC 468-34-110 WAC 468-34-160 WAC 468-34-170 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process of obtaining a franchise or permit through a state highway right of way in Washington State. A utility permit or franchise is required for occupancy of a highway right of way by utility facilities, including private lines. WAC 468-34-160. The process is

307

GRR/Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process GRR/Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process 19-WA-b - New Water Right Permit Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.03 Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.44 Triggers None specified Washington uses a prior appropriation system for the distribution of both surface water and ground water rights in which water users receive the right to use water on a "first in time, first in right" basis. Under Washington law, the waters of Washington belong collectively to the public

308

GRR/Section 19-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right 9-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right 19-WA-c - Transfer or Change of Water Right.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington 90.03.380 Revised Code of Washington 90.44.100 Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.80 Triggers None specified Much of Washington's public waters have been accounted for through water right claims, permits, or certificates. As a result, many individuals seeking water rights try to acquire existing water rights already in use or change the use of a current water right they already hold. Certain elements

309

EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA 7: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA Summary This EIS will evaluate the environmental impacts of a proposal to enter into a contract with a licensed natural gas supplier in Washington State to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas pipeline. The pipeline would deliver natural gas to support the Waste Treatment Plant and the 242-A Evaporator operations in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. For more information, contact: Mr. Douglas Chapin, NEPA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352 Documents Available for Download January 23, 2012 EIS-0467: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and

310

GRR/Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement GRR/Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement 9-WA-c - State Environmental Impact Statement.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified The primary purpose of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is to ensure that the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) policies are an integral part of the ongoing programs and actions of state and local government. An EIS must provide impartial discussion of significant environmental impacts and must inform decision makers and the public of reasonable alternatives, including mitigation measures that would avoid or minimize adverse impacts or enhance environmental quality. WAC 197-11-400.

311

GRR/Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells GRR/Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells 19-WA-f - Water Well NOI for Replacement or Additional Wells.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington 90.44.100 Revised Code of Washington 18.104.048 Washington Administrative Code 173-160-151 Triggers None specified A developer seeking to use ground water for an activity may need to drill a new well in a different location than a previous well, drill an additional well at an existing location, or drill a replacement well at the same

312

GRR/Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview GRR/Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview 11-WA-a - State Cultural Considerations Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified The developer will be required to comply with Washington state law when human remains or other cultural resources are discovered on a project site. Cultural resources include both historic and archaeological resources and sites. The discovery of cultural resources may require obtaining a permit and providing public notice and notice to Indian Tribes. Once the necessary procedures have been followed, the developer may continue with the project.

313

GRR/Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit GRR/Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit 14-WA-c - Underground Injection Control Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Chapter 173-218 WAC Non-endangerment Standard Triggers None specified The Safe Drinking Water Act requires Washington to implement technical criteria and standards to protect underground sources of drinking water from contamination. Under Chapter 173-218 WAC, the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) regulates and permits underground injection control (UIC) wells in Washington. The Environmental Protection Agency

314

GRR/Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process GRR/Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process 18-WA-a - Underground Storage Tank Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.76 Washington Administrative Code Chapter 173-360 Triggers None specified Washington has a federally-approved state Underground Storage Tank (UST) program regulated by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) under Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.76 and Washington Administrative Code Chapter 173-360. Washington defines an "Underground

315

GRR/Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development GRR/Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 5-WA-a - Drilling and Well Development 5-WA-a.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies Geothermal Act 78.60 RCW Geothermal Rules 332-17 WAC Triggers None specified In Washington geothermal drilling and well development are regulated by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR). Geothermal production wells and core holes deeper than 750ft require the developer go through the whole WSDNR permitting process (which requires a public hearing) and require that the developer complete the State Environmental

316

GRR/Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process GRR/Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process 3-WA-e - State Right of Way Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies RCW 79-36-350 RCW 79-36-520 RCW 79-36-530 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process for obtaining a right of way over state lands in Washington. The right of way process is overseen by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR). The right of way process is regulated under Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 79-36-350. The developer may apply for an easement, permit or license for a right of

317

GRR/Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification GRR/Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 14-WA-d - Section 401 Water Quality Certification 14-WA-d - 401 Water Quality Certification.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies U S Army Corps of Engineers Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Statute of Washington Chapter 90.48 Washington Administrative Code Chapter 173-201A Washington Administrative Code 173-225-030 Triggers None specified Developers requiring a Section 404 Dredge and Fill Permit from the U S Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) are required to obtain a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the state of Washington. The Washington State

318

GRR/Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well GRR/Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well 19-WA-e - Water Well Notice of Intent for New Well.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington 18.104.048 Washington Administrative Code 173-160-151 Triggers None specified A developer seeking to use ground water for an activity may need to drill a new well to access the ground water. When a developer needs to drill a new well, the developer must complete the Notice of Intent (NOI) to Drill a Well form and submit the form to the Washington State Department of Ecology

319

GRR/Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process GRR/Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process 14-WA-b - State NPDES Permitting Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology United States Environmental Protection Agency Regulations & Policies Clean Water Act Chapter 90.48 RCW Chapter 173-216 WAC Triggers None specified Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to regulate discharge of pollutants from point sources. In Washington, the EPA has delegated responsibility of NPDES to

320

WA_1994_004_ALUMINUM_COMPANY_OF_AMERICA_Waiver_of_Domestic_a...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MPANYOFAMERICAWaiverofDomestica.pdf More Documents & Publications WA1993034CONSOLIDATEDNATURALGAS(CNG)WaiverofDomesti.pdf ClassWaiverWC-2000-004.pdf DOE M 483.1-1...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

GRR/Section 19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

19-WA-d - Water Conservancy Board Transfer or Change of Water Right < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of...

322

Fisher & Paykel Appliances: ENERGY STAR Referral (WA42T26GW1)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE referred the matter of Fisher & Paykel Appliances residential clothes washer, model WA42T26GW1, to the EPA for appropriate action after DOE testing showed that the model does not meet the ENERGY STAR specification.

323

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-069 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09-069 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-069 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to...

324

GRR/Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease GRR/Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-WA-a - State Geothermal Lease 3-WA-a State Geothermal Lease.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Natural Resources Regulations & Policies Chapter 79.14 RCW Chapter 344-12 WAC Triggers None specified The State of Washington is still in the process of developing and finalizing the rules and regulations related to geothermal leases on state lands; however, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR) expects the process to be similar to the process for leasing state lands for oil and natural gas development. The rules and regulations for

325

GRR/Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process GRR/Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process 11-WA-c - Archaeological Resource Discovery Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified In the state of Washington, cultural resource concerns are integrated as early as possible into the planning for capital projects and are protected if discovered during construction. Washington defines "Cultural resources" as archeological and historical sites and artifacts, and traditional areas or items of religious, ceremonial and social uses to affected tribes. Washington defines an "Archaeological resource" as any

326

GRR/Section 19-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

9-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview 9-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 19-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview 19-WA-a - Water Access and Water Rights Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.03 Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.44 RCW 90.44.050 Triggers None specified Similar to many western states, only a small amount of water is available for appropriation in Washington. As a result, Washington has developed a comprehensive regulatory scheme for the distribution of water rights and use of water in the state. Washington employs a prior appropriation or

327

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-005 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

328

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-013 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

329

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-018 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-018 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

330

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-031 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-031 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

331

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-004 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-004 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

332

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-002 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

333

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-033 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-033 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

334

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-029 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-029 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

335

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-030 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-030 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

336

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-016 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-016 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

337

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-019 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-019 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

338

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-032 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-032 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

339

Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-007 This document waives certain patent rights the Department of Energy (DOE) has to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice by...

340

Balance : Lancaster County's tragedy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Lancaster County, Pennsylvania residents are proud of their agricultural heritage. They do not want to see their farmland disappear. But the County continues to be developed into residential subdivisions. This thesis ...

Gingrich, Valerie (Valerie J.)

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Yakima and Touchet River Basins Phase II Fish Screen Evaluation, 2006-2007 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 2006, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) researchers evaluated 27 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima and Touchet river basins. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory performs these evaluations for Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to determine whether the fish screening devices meet those National Marine Fisheries (NMFS) criteria for juvenile fish screen design, that promote safe and timely passage of juvenile salmonids. The NMFS criteria against which the sites were evaluated are as follows: (1) a uniform flow distribution over the screen surface to minimize approach velocity; (2) approach velocities less than or equal to 0.4 ft/s protects the smallest salmonids from impingement; (3) sweep velocities that are greater than approach velocities to minimize delay of out-migrating juveniles and minimize sediment deposition near the screens; (4) a bypass flow greater than or equal to the maximum flow velocity vector resultant upstream of the screens to also minimize delay of out-migrating salmonids; (5) a gradual and efficient acceleration of flow from the upstream end of the site into the bypass entrance to minimize delay of out-migrating salmonids; and (6) screen submergence between 65% and 85% for drum screen sites. In addition, the silt and debris accumulation next to the screens should be kept to a minimum to prevent excessive wear on screens, seals and cleaning mechanisms. Evaluations consist of measuring velocities in front of the screens, using an underwater camera to assess the condition and environment in front of the screens, and noting the general condition and operation of the sites. Results of the evaluations in 2006 include the following: (1) Most approach velocities met the NMFS criterion of less than or equal to 0.4 ft/s. Of the sites evaluated, 31% exceeded the criterion at least once. Thirty-three percent of flat-plate screens had problems compared to 25% of drum screens. (2) Woody debris and gravel deposited during high river levels were a problem at several sites. In some cases, it was difficult to determine the bypass pipe was plugged until several weeks had passed. Slow bypass flow caused by both the obstructions and high river levels may have discouraged fish from entering the bypass, but once they were in the bypass, they may have had no safe exit. Perhaps some tool or technique can be devised that would help identify whether slow bypass flow is caused by pipe blockage or by high river levels. (3) Bypass velocities generally were greater than sweep velocities, but sweep velocities often did not increase toward the bypass. The latter condition could slow migration of fish through the facility. (4) Screen and seal materials generally were in good condition. (5) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well-greased and operative. (6) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) generally operated and maintained fish screen facilities in a way that provided safe passage for juvenile fish. (7) Efforts with WDFW to find optimal louver settings at Naches-Selah were partly successful. The number of spots with excessive approach velocities was decreased, but we were unable to adjust the site to bring all approach values below 0.4 ft/s. (8) In some instances, irrigators responsible for specific maintenance at their sites (e.g., debris removal) did not perform their tasks in a way that provided optimum operation of the fish screen facility. Enforcement personnel proved effective at reminding irrigation districts of their responsibilities to maintain the sites for fish protection as well as irrigation. (9) We recommend placing datasheets providing up-to-date operating criteria and design flows in each site's logbox. The datasheet should include bypass design flows and a table showing depths of water over the weir and corresponding bypass flow. A similar datasheet relating canal gage readings and canal discharge in cubic feet per second would help identify times when the canal is taking mo

Chamness, Mickie; Tunnicliffe, Cherylyn [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Kiowa County Commons Building  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This poster describes the energy efficiency features and sustainable materials used in the Kiowa County Commons Building in Greensburg, Kansas.

343

Carroll County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance sets forth regulations for the zoning, erection, and operation of small wind energy systems in Carroll County, Maryland.

344

Kent County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance establishes provisions and standards for small wind energy systems in various zoning districts in Kent County, Maryland.

345

DOE/EIS-0169-SA-02: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project --Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site Housing and Upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery (8/16/99)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 16, 1999 August 16, 1999 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEWI-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project, DOE/EIS-0169-SA-02 David Byrnes Project Manager - KEWN-4 Proposed Action: Yakima Fisheries Project - Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site Housing, and Upgrades to the Prosser Hatchery PL-6: F3204 Location: Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility, Cle Elum, Washington (CESRF) and Prosser Juvenile Research Facility, Prosser, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Co-Managed by the Yakama Nation (YN) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1. Introduction The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is funding ongoing studies, research, and artificial production of several salmonid species in the Yakima and Klickitat river basins. BPA analyzed

346

A Summary of Information on the Behavior of the Yakima Fold Belt as a Structural Entity -- Topical Report  

SciTech Connect

This document is one in a series of topical reports compiled by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to summarize technical information on selected topics important to the performance of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) of the Hanford Site. The purpose of this report is to summarize available data and analyses relevant to the Yakima Fold Belt (YFB) that may bear on the question of whether or not the YFB behaves as a single seismotectonic province in which activity along one fold structure is representative of behavior along all other fold structures. This topic has met with a fairly high level of contention in the expert community and has the potential to result in significant impacts on an evaluation of seismic hazard at the Hanford Site. This report defines the relevant alternative conceptual models relevant to this technical issue and the arguments and data that support those models. It provides a brief description of the technical issue and principal uncertainties; a general overview on the nature of the technical issue, along with alternative conceptual models, supporting arguments and information, and uncertainties; and finally, it suggests some possible approaches for reducing uncertainties regarding this issue.

Last, George V.; Winsor, Kelsey; Unwin, Stephen D.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

A Summary of Coupled, Uncoupled, and Hybrid Tectonic Models for the Yakima Fold Belt--Topical Report  

SciTech Connect

This document is one in a series of topical reports compiled by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to summarize technical information on selected topics important to the performance of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of the Hanford Site. The purpose of this report is to summarize the range of opinions and supporting information expressed by the expert community regarding whether a coupled or uncoupled model, or a combination of both, best represents structures in the Yakima Fold Belt. This issue was assessed to have a high level of contention with up to moderate potential for impact on the hazard estimate. This report defines the alternative conceptual models relevant to this technical issue and the arguments and data that support those models. It provides a brief description of the technical issue and principal uncertainties; a general overview on the nature of the technical issue, along with alternative conceptual models, supporting arguments and information, and uncertainties; and finally, suggests some possible approaches for reducing uncertainties regarding this issue.

Chamness, Michele A.; Winsor, Kelsey; Unwin, Stephen D.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings Los Angeles County - LEED for County Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Solar Lighting Windows, Doors, & Skylights Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Heating Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Wind Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Los Angeles County In January 2007, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted rules to require that all new county buildings greater than 10,000 square feet be LEED Silver certified. All buildings authorized and fully funded on or

349

counties - more challenges | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- more challenges Counties Data Apps Challenges Policies Counties You are here Data.gov Communities Counties Challenge.gov...

350

Category:Counties | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Counties Counties Jump to: navigation, search This category contains all counties in the United States of America. Contents: Top - 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Pages in category "Counties" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 3,142 total. (previous 200) (next 200) A Abbeville County, South Carolina Acadia Parish, Louisiana Accomack County, Virginia Ada County, Idaho Adair County, Iowa Adair County, Kentucky Adair County, Missouri Adair County, Oklahoma Adams County, Colorado Adams County, Idaho Adams County, Illinois Adams County, Indiana Adams County, Iowa Adams County, Mississippi Adams County, Nebraska Adams County, North Dakota Adams County, Ohio Adams County, Pennsylvania Adams County, Washington Adams County, Wisconsin

351

Ballard Library and Neighborhood Service Center - Seattle, WA by Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Architects [EDRA/Places Awards 2008 -- Design  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Architects / Ballard Library 2008WA Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Architects Seattle residents loveService Center, the architects, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson,

Merlino, Kathryn Rogers

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

352

Wicomico County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Establishes zoning regulations for the installation and construction of small wind energy systems in Wicomico County for private landowners, subject to reasonable restrictions.

353

Washington County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance establishes regulations to facilitate the installation and construction of Small Wind Energy Systems in Washington County for private landowners, subject to reasonable restrictions...

354

Montgomery County Public Schools  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) is the largest school district in the state of Maryland and the 16th-largest school district in the nation. ...

2011-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

355

GRR/Section 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit 15-WA-b - Air Operating Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies WAC 173-401-500 WAC 173-401-800 WAC 173-401-810 WAC 173-401-735 WAC 173-401-610 Triggers None specified This flowchart illustrates the process for obtaining an Air Operating Permit in Washington State. The Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) issues Air Operating Permit under WAC 173-401. An Air Operating Permit is required if a facility has the potential to emit

356

GRR/Section 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview 9-WA-a - State Environmental Overview.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified The Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. Washington uses an Environmental Checklist and Environmental Review (ER) to provide information to help government agencies identify impacts from their proposals and determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary.

357

MEMORANDUM : APPROVAL TO MODIFY ADVANCE WAIVER OF PATENT RIGHTS W(A)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: APPROVAL TO MODIFY ADVANCE WAIVER OF PATENT RIGHTS W(A) : APPROVAL TO MODIFY ADVANCE WAIVER OF PATENT RIGHTS W(A) 2009-047 GRANTED FOR US SOLAR HOLDINGS LLC UNDER AGREEMENT NO. DE-FC36-08G018 155 US Solar Holdings LLC ("US Solar") has requested that the Department of Energy ("DOE") modify or clarify the cost share requirements set forth in the statement of considerations for the granted advance patent waiver W(A) 2009-047. Specifically, the statement of considerations, as originally granted, states the following: The total cost of the award is approximately $4 million with the Petitioner providing about 50% cost sharing. This waiver is contingent upon the Petitioner maintaining, in aggregate, the above cost sharing percentage over the course of the agreement. Rather than just provide an aggregate cost share requirement of 50% for the agreement, US Solar

358

GRR/Section 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

form form View source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » GRR/Section 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process 7-WA-a - Energy Facility Siting Process (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Regulations & Policies RCW 80.50.60(1) WAC 463-60 RCW 80.50.090(2) WAC 463-30-270 WAC 463-30-320 Triggers None specified Under RCW 80.50.60(1) a developer may not begin construction of a new energy facility site until they obtain Energy Facility Siting certification

359

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima and Touchet River Basins, 2005-2006 Annual Reports.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 2005, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) researchers evaluated 25 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima and Touchet river basins. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory performs these evaluations for Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to determine whether the fish screening devices meet National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. Evaluations consist of measuring velocities in front of the screens, using an underwater camera to look at the condition and environment in front of the screens, and noting the general condition and operation of the sites. Results of the evaluations in 2005 include the following: (1) Most approach velocities met the NMFS criterion of less than or equal to 0.4 fps. Less than 13% of all approach measurements exceeded the criterion, and these occurred at 10 of the sites. Flat-plate screens had more problems than drum screens with high approach velocities. (2) Bypass velocities generally were greater than sweep velocities, but sweep velocities often did not increase toward the bypass. The latter condition could slow migration of fish through the facility. (3) Screen and seal materials generally were in good condition. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well-greased and operative. (5) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) generally operate and maintain fish screen facilities in a way that provides safe passage for juvenile fish. (6) In some instances, irrigators responsible for specific maintenance at their sites (e.g., debris removal) are not performing their tasks in a way that provides optimum operation of the fish screen facility. New ways need to be found to encourage them to maintain their facilities properly. (7) We recommend placing datasheets providing up-to-date operating criteria and design flows in each sites logbox. The datasheet should include bypass design flows and a table showing depths of water over the weir and corresponding bypass flow. This information is available at some of the sites but may be outdated. These data are used to determine if the site is running within design criteria. (8) Modifying use of debris control plates at Gleed helped minimize the extreme fluctuations in flow, but approach velocities are still too high. Other ways to reduce the approach velocities need to be tried, possibly including redesign of the site. (9) Alternatives to a screen site at Taylor should be considered. A lot of effort was spent trying to increase water to the site, but it still was unable to operate within NMFS criteria for most of the year and may be a hazard to juvenile salmonids. We conclude that the conditions at most of the Phase II fish screen facilities we evaluated in 2005 would be expected to provide safe passage for juvenile fish. For those sites where conditions are not always optimum for safe fish passage, PNNL researchers will try to coordinate with the WDFW and USBR in 2006 to find solutions to the problems. Some of those problems are consistently high approach velocities at specific sites, including Congdon, Naches-Selah, Union Gap, and Yakima-Tieton. We would like to be able to monitor changes in velocities as soon as operations and maintenance personnel adjust the louvers or porosity boards at these sites. This will give them immediate feedback on the results of their modifications and allow additional adjustments as necessary until the conditions meet NMFS criteria. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has performed evaluations at many of these sites over the past 8 years, providing information WDFW and USBR personnel can use to perform their operations and maintenance more effectively. Consequently, overall effectiveness of the screens facilities has improved over time.

Chamness, Mickie; Abernethy, C.; Tunnicliffe, Cherylyn (PNNL)

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Spring Chinook Salmon Interactions Indices and Residual/Precocial Monitoring in the Upper Yakima Basin, 1998 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Select ecological interactions and spring chinook salmon residual/precocial abundance were monitored in 1998 as part of the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project's supplementation monitoring program. Monitoring these variables is part of an effort to help evaluate the factors that contribute to, or limit supplementation success. The ecological interactions that were monitored were prey consumption, competition for food, and competition for space. The abundance of spring chinook salmon life-history forms that have the potential to be influenced by supplementation and that have important ecological and genetic roles were monitored (residuals and precocials). Residual spring chinook salmon do not migrate to the ocean during the normal emigration period and continue to rear in freshwater. Precocials are those salmon that precocially mature in freshwater. The purpose of sampling during 1998 was to collect baseline data one year prior to the release of hatchery spring chinook salmon which occurred during the spring of 1999. All sampling that the authors report on here was conducted in upper Yakima River during summer and fall 1998. The stomach fullness of juvenile spring chinook salmon during the summer and fall averaged 12%. The food competition index suggested that mountain whitefish (0.59), rainbow trout (0.55), and redside shiner (0.55) were competing for food with spring chinook salmon. The space competition index suggested that rainbow trout (0.31) and redside shiner (0.39) were competing for space with spring chinook salmon but mountain whitefish (0.05) were not. Age-0 spring chinook salmon selected a fairly narrow range of microhabitat parameters in the summer and fall relative to what was available. Mean focal depths and velocities for age 0 spring chinook salmon during the summer were 0.5 m {+-} 0.2 m and 0.26 m/s {+-} 0.19 m/s, and during the fall 0.5 m {+-} 0.2 m and 0.24 m/s {+-} 0.18 m/s. Among potential competitors, age 1+ rainbow trout exhibited the greatest degree of microhabitat overlap with spring chinook salmon. Abundance of naturally occurring spring chinook salmon residuals (age 1+ during the summer) was low (< 0.007/m), representing less than 2% of the naturally produced spring chinook salmon (age 0+ and age 1+ during the summer). Abundance of naturally occurring spring chinook salmon that complete their life cycle in freshwater was high relative to anadromous adults. The authors observed an average of 9.5 precocially mature spring chinook salmon on redds with anadromous adults. In addition, 87% of the redds with anadromous adults present also had precocial males attending. All findings in this report should be considered preliminary and subject to further revision as more data and analytical results become available.

James, Brenda B.; Pearsons, Todd N.; McMichael, Geoffrey A. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 2004, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 25 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2004, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by NOAA Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well-greased and operative. (4) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites. (5) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve passage conditions for juvenile fish. For example, Taylor has had problems meeting bypass flow and submergence operating criteria since the main river channel shifted away from the site 2 years ago, and Fruitvale consistently has had problems meeting bypass flow criteria when the water is low. (6) Continued problems at Gleed point to design flaws. This site should be considered for redesign or replacement.

Vucelick, Jessica; McMichael, Geoffrey; Chamness, Mickie [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

San Diego County - Design Standards for County Facilities | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Design Standards for County Facilities Design Standards for County Facilities San Diego County - Design Standards for County Facilities < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Bioenergy Manufacturing Buying & Making Electricity Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Energy Sources Solar Wind Other Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider San Diego County The San Diego County Board of Supervisors established design standards for county facilities and property. Among other requirements, the policy requires that all new county buildings or major building renovations obtain U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED Building Certification.

363

Juvenile Salmonid Pit-Tag Studies at Prosser Dam and the Chandler Canal Fish Collection Facility, Yakima River, 1991 and 1992 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In 1991 and 1992, the National Marine Fisheries Service completed the second and third years of a 3-year study to estimate juvenile salmonid (Oncorhynchus spp.) timing and survival characteristics related to passage through the Prosser Dam complex, including the Chandler Canal and the Chandler fish collection facility, on the Yakima River. Yearling chinook (O. tshawyacha) and coho salmon (O. kisutch) were collected at the Chandler facility, PIT tagged, and released at various locations in the Yakima River, Chandler Canal, and the Chandler facility. Individual fish were subsequently detected at PIT-tag detection monitors at the Chandler facility and/or McNary Dam on the Columbia River. Survival through various reaches, PIT-tag detection efficiency, and Chandler Canal fish entrainment proportion parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood techniques. The research objectives in 1991 and 1992 were to: (1) assess the effects of passage through the Chandler Canal and the Chandler facility on the survival of juvenile salmonids, (2) determine the entrainment rate of juvenile salmonids into the Chandler Canal as a function of river flow, and (3) determine the efficiency and reliability of the PIT-tag monitoring system at the Chandler facility. The initial 1990 research plan was expanded in 1991 and 1992 to include several more release locations and many more release days.

Ruehle, Thomas E.; Sandford, Benjamin P.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Recipient: County of Washington, Oregon ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25 25 Recipient: County of Washington, Oregon ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Wa. Co. EE&C Project for County Facilities and Land Use and Transportation Development A9 B5.1 Waste stream Clause Historical Preservation Clause Engineering Clause (Installation of rooftop PV systems onto county government buildings) Energy Efficiency Retrofits B2.5 B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historical Preservation Clause (EE retrofits and lighting replacements) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Development Project - Transportation A9 All CX applies to administration, planning, siting and developing of a bike, trail and pedestrian system.

365

Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings Harris County - LEED Requirement for County Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Texas Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Harris County In 2009, the Harris County Commissioners Court approved a measure that requires all new county buildings to meet minimum LEED certification standards. Buildings do not have to register with the the U.S. Green Building Council. The Harris County Facilities and Property Management (FPM) Division also requires all county buildings to meet minimum energy efficiency and sustainability measures, as described in the

366

Frederick County- Green Building Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Frederick County administers a green building program. It has two goals: (1) to ensure that County building projects implement strategies that enhance environmental performance and fiscal...

367

GRR/Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit GRR/Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit 18-WA-b - Dangerous Waste Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Ecology Regulations & Policies WAC 173-303-020 WAC 173-303-060 WAC 173-303-070 WAC 173-303-071 WAC 173-303-072 WAC 173-303-081 WAC 173-303-082 WAC 173-303-090 WAC 173-303-100 WAC 173-303-110 WAC 173-303-140 WAC 173-303-220 WAC 173-303-281 WAC 173-303-282 WAC 173-303-803 WAC 173-303-845 Triggers None specified The Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDE) oversees the permitting process for dangerous and solid waste. In Washington, a developer must obtain a permit if they handle dangerous waste and solid waste and are

368

Qi-Wa, a problem that has plagued Chinese scrolls for millenniums  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Qi-Wa refers to the up curl on the lengths of handscrolls and hanging scrolls, which has troubled Chinese artisans and emperors for as long as the art of painting and calligraphy exists. This warp is unwelcomed not only for aesthetic reasons, but its potential damage to the fiber and ink. Although it is generally treated as a part of the cockling and curling due to climate, mounting procedures, and conservation conditions, we emphasize that the intrinsic curvature incurred from the storage is in fact the main cause of Qi-Wa. The Qi-Wa height is determined by experiments to obey scaling relations with the length, width, curvature, and thickness of the scroll, which are supported by Molecular Dynamics Simulation and theoretic derivations. This understanding helps us come up with plausible remedies to mitigate Qi-Wa. All proposals are tested on real mounted paper and in simulations. Due to the general nature of this warp, we believe the lessons learnt from studying ancient Chinese scrolls can be applied to moder...

Chou, Ming-Han; Wang, Yi-Ping; Hong, Sun-Hsin; Hong, Tzay-Ming

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

W(A)-02-009, CONSOL ENERGY, INC. CLOSED PER INSTRUCTIONS FROM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-02-009, CONSOL ENERGY, INC. CLOSED PER INSTRUCTIONS FROM MIKE HOFFMAN ON 8262003. SEE W(A)-02-053. JPN 08 2002 07:00 FR IPL DOE CH 630 252 2779 TO AGCP-HQ P.1010 * * Hi Katie,...

370

Regional Lead Agents and County Coordinators 2011 RESPONSIBILITY NAME COUNTY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Coordinator Jay Crouch Newberry County Coordinator Vicky Bertagnolli Aiken REGION 8 Regional Lead Karissa

Bolding, M. Chad

371

Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction Suffolk County - LEED Program for County Construction < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State New York Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Suffolk County In 2006, the Suffolk County Legislature enacted Resolution No. 126-2006, creating the Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED) Program for county construction projects. The program requirements were revised in 2008 (Resolution No. 551-2008), and again in 2011 (Resolution No. 458-2011). The program requires the County Department of Public Works to apply the LEED

372

Influences of Stocking Salmon Carcass Analogs on Salmonids in Yakima River Tributaries, 2001-2002 Technical Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The benefits that marine derived nutrients from adult salmon carcasses provide to juvenile salmonids are increasingly being recognized. Current estimates suggest that only 6-7% of marine-derived nitrogen and phosphorus that were historically available to salmonids in the Pacific Northwest are currently available. Food limitation may be a major constraint limiting the restoration of salmonids. A variety of methods have been proposed to offset this nutrient deficit including: allowing greater salmon spawning escapement, stocking hatchery salmon carcasses, and stocking inorganic nutrients. Unfortunately, each of these methods has some ecological or socio-economic shortcoming. We intend to overcome many of these shortcomings by making and evaluating a pathogen free product that simulates a salmon carcass (analog). Abundant sources of marine derived nutrients are available such as fish offal from commercial fishing and salmon carcasses from hatcheries. However, a method for recycling these nutrients into a pathogen free analog that degrades at a similar rate as a natural salmon carcass has never been developed. We endeavored to (1) develop a salmon carcass analog that will increase the food available to salmonids, (2) determine the pathways that salmonids use to acquire food from analogs, and (3) determine the benefits to salmonids and the potential for application to salmonid restoration. We used a before-after-control-impact-paired design in six tributaries of the upper Yakima basin to determine the utility of stocking carcass analogs. Our preliminary results suggest that the introduction of carcass analogs into food-limited streams can be used to restore food pathways previously provided by anadromous salmon. The analogs probably reproduced both of the major food pathways that salmon carcasses produce: direct consumption and food chain enhancement. Trout and salmon fed directly on the carcass analogs during the late summer and presumably benefited from the increased invertebrate biomass later in the year. Future reports will analyze whether any benefits are statistically detectable. The risks of using carcass analogs also appear to be low. Pathogens appear to be killed in the manufacturing process of the analogs. In addition, preliminary results suggest that fish exposed to the analogs did not have higher incidences of pathogens. The water quality was also not degraded by the analog additions with the exception of a temporary surface film. Finally, our anecdotal observations, suggested that there was not an increase in the number of predators during the first year of analog distribution. In summary, the risks of analog placement appear to be low but the benefits appear to be high. All results should be considered preliminary until further analyses and field work are conducted.

Pearsons, Todd N.; Johnson, Christopher L. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2003-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Coyotes in Cook County  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coyotes in Cook County Coyotes in Cook County Nature Bulletin No. 2 Forest Preserve District of Cook County -- July 31, 1969 George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Superintendent of Conversation COYOTES IN COOK COUNTY One winter night, a Forest Preserve Ranger heard the yapping howl of some animal that made his hair stand on end. A few days later, a farmer in the Sag valley saw what appeared to be a wolf lope across a road. Finally, the ranger, concealed within sight of a faint path apparently used by wild dogs or foxes, shot a coyote. The little bunch of black bristles at the base of its tail, covering a scent gland beneath the skin identified it as being of the wolf family. The animal was sent to the Illinois Natural History Survey, at Urbana, where it was pronounced to be a prairie wolf (also known as the "brush" wolf). In the west it is generally known by its Spanish name: coyote.

374

County\paa  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Eureka County Eureka County Yucca Mountain Information Office P.O. Box 257 Eureka, Nevada 89316 (702) 237-5372 FAX (702) 237-5708 January 29, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20585 RE: Price-Anderson Act To Whom It May Concern: In response the Federal Register notice of December 31, 1997 requesting public comments on the Price-Anderson Act (PAA), Eureka County, Nevada is submitting these comments. Eureka County is one of the affected units of local government under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 as amended. With potential socioeconomic, environmental and transportation impacts, we have a strong interest in oversight of the DOE's Yucca Mountain project activities, including transportation impacts and

375

County Wind Ordinance Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

[http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_45_bill_200... Assembly Bill 45] of 2009 authorized counties to adopt ordinances to provide for the installation of small wind systems ...

376

Caroline County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance amends Chapter 175 of the Code of Public Local Laws of Caroline County, Maryland to provide for the erection, maintenance, and operation of small wind energy systems, as well as...

377

RECIPIENT:Placer County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MANAGEMENfCENTER .. NEAnE:'l'ERlVIIN).'I:rQ1"l PROJECT TITLE: Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project Page 1 of2 . .. . W STATE:CA Funding Opportunity...

378

Property:County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search Property Name County Property Type String Description County Name Pages using the property "County" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Akutan Geothermal Project + Aleutians East Borough, AK + Alligator Geothermal Geothermal Project + White Pine County, NV + Alum Geothermal Project + Esmerelda County, NV + Aurora Geothermal Project + Mineral County, NV + B Bald Mountain Geothermal Project + Lassen County, CA + Baltazor Springs Geothermal Project + Humboldt County, NV + Barren Hills Geothermal Project + Lyon, NV + Black Rock I Geothermal Project + Imperial County, OR + Black Rock II Geothermal Project + Imperial County, CA + Black Rock III Geothermal Project + Imperial County, CA +

379

Testing Buda-Lund hydro model on particle correlations and spectra in NA44, WA93 and WA98 heavy ion experiments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Analytic and numerical approximations to a hydrodynamical model describing longitudinally expanding, cylindrically symmetric, finite systems are fitted to preliminary NA44 data measured in 200 AGeV central $S + Pb$ reactions. The model describes the measured spectra and HBT radii of pions, kaons and protons, simultaneously. The source is characterized by a central freeze-out temperature of T_0 = 154 +/- 8 +/- 11 MeV, a "surface" temperature of T_r = 107 +/- 28 +/- 18 MeV and by a well-developed transverse flow, = 0.53 +/- 0.17 +/- 0.11. The transverse geometrical radius and the mean freeze-out time are found to be R_G = 5.4 +/- 0.9 +/- 0.7 fm and tau_0 = 5.1 +/- 0.3 +/- 0.3 fm/c, respectively. Fits to preliminary WA93 200 AGeV S + Au and WA98 158 AGeV Pb + Pb data dominated by pions indicate similar model parameters. The absolute normalization of the measured particle spectra together with the experimental determination of both the statistical and the systematic errors were needed to obtain successful fits.

A. Ster; T. Csorgo; B. Lorstad

1998-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

380

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Monitoring and Evaluation, Final Report For the Performance Period May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009.  

SciTech Connect

The Yakima-Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) is a joint project of the Yakama Nation (lead entity) and the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and is sponsored in large part by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) with oversight and guidance from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC). It is among the largest and most complex fisheries management projects in the Columbia Basin in terms of data collection and management, physical facilities, habitat enhancement and management, and experimental design and research on fisheries resources. Using principles of adaptive management, the YKFP is attempting to evaluate all stocks historically present in the Yakima subbasin and apply a combination of habitat restoration and hatchery supplementation or reintroduction, to restore the Yakima Subbasin ecosystem with sustainable and harvestable populations of salmon, steelhead and other at-risk species. The original impetus for the YKFP resulted from the landmark fishing disputes of the 1970s, the ensuing legal decisions in United States versus Washington and United States versus Oregon, and the region's realization that lost natural production needed to be mitigated in upriver areas where these losses primarily occurred. The YKFP was first identified in the NPCC's 1982 Fish and Wildlife Program (FWP) and supported in the U.S. v Oregon 1988 Columbia River Fish Management Plan (CRFMP). A draft Master Plan was presented to the NPCC in 1987 and the Preliminary Design Report was presented in 1990. In both circumstances, the NPCC instructed the Yakama Nation, WDFW and BPA to carry out planning functions that addressed uncertainties in regard to the adequacy of hatchery supplementation for meeting production objectives and limiting adverse ecological and genetic impacts. At the same time, the NPCC underscored the importance of using adaptive management principles to manage the direction of the Project. The 1994 FWP reiterated the importance of proceeding with the YKFP because of the added production and learning potential the project would provide. The YKFP is unique in having been designed to rigorously test the efficacy of hatchery supplementation. Given the current dire situation of many salmon and steelhead stocks, and the heavy reliance on artificial propagation as a recovery tool, YKFP monitoring results will have great region-wide significance. Supplementation is envisioned as a means to enhance and sustain the abundance of wild and naturally-spawning populations at levels exceeding the cumulative mortality burden imposed on those populations by habitat degradation and by natural cycles in environmental conditions. A supplementation hatchery is properly operated as an adjunct to the natural production system in a watershed. By fully integrating the hatchery with a naturally-producing population, high survival rates for the component of the population in the hatchery can raise the average abundance of the total population (hatchery component + naturally-producing component) to a level that compensates for the high mortalities imposed by human development activities and fully seeds the natural environment. The objectives of the YKFP are to: use Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment (EDT) and other modeling tools to facilitate planning for project activities, enhance existing stocks, re-introduce extirpated stocks, protect and restore habitat in the Yakima Subbasin, and operate using a scientifically rigorous process that will foster application of the knowledge gained about hatchery supplementation and habitat restoration throughout the Columbia River Basin. The YKFP is still in the early stages of evaluation, and as such the data and findings presented in this report should be considered preliminary until results are published in the peer-reviewed literature. The following is a brief summary of current YKFP activities by species.

Sampson, Melvin R. [The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation

2009-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Property:FIPS County Code | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

FIPS County Code FIPS County Code Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Pages using the property "FIPS County Code" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Abbeville County, South Carolina + 001 + Acadia Parish, Louisiana + 001 + Accomack County, Virginia + 001 + Ada County, Idaho + 001 + Adair County, Iowa + 001 + Adair County, Kentucky + 001 + Adair County, Missouri + 001 + Adair County, Oklahoma + 001 + Adams County, Colorado + 001 + Adams County, Idaho + 003 + Adams County, Illinois + 001 + Adams County, Indiana + 001 + Adams County, Iowa + 003 + Adams County, Mississippi + 001 + Adams County, Nebraska + 001 + Adams County, North Dakota + 001 + Adams County, Ohio + 001 + Adams County, Pennsylvania + 001 +

382

Anemometer Data (Wind Speed, Direction) for Quinault #3, WA (2004 - 2005) |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Quinault #3, WA (2004 - 2005) Quinault #3, WA (2004 - 2005) Dataset Summary Description Wind data collected from Quinault Indian Reservation in Washington from an anemometer as part of the Native American anemometer loan program. Monthly mean wind speed is available for 2004 through 2005, as is wind direction and turbulence data. Data is reported from a height of 20 m. The data was originally made available by Wind Powering America, a DOE Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) program. A dynamic map displaying all available data from DOE anemometer loan programs is available http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/anemometerloans/projects.asp. Source EERE Date Released December 02nd, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated December 02nd, 2010 (4 years ago) Keywords wind

383

A synthesis of ethnohistorical materials concerning the administration of Federal Indian policy among the Yakima, Umatilla, and Nez Perce Indian people: Working draft  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

For the purposes of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, and the Nez Perce Tribe have been accorded the status of ''Affected Indian Tribe'' and have become party to the proceedings to determine a suitable location for the nation's first commercial waste repository. Each of the Tribes has expressed concerns about the suitability of the Hanford Site in eastern Washington. These concerns, in general, address the proposed repository's effects on traditional spiritual beliefs and cultural practices, on tribal sovereignty and the Tribes' right to self-government, on the natural resources under tribal management jurisdiction, and on the health and socioeconomic characteristics of the Tribes' reservation communities. The Yakima, Umatilla, and Nez Perce have distinctive cultural traditions that may be adversely affected by activities related to the Basalt Waste Isolation Project (BWIP). Further, the Tribes enjoy a unique relationship with the federal government. Because of their distinctive cultures and governmental status, particular attention will be paid to expressed interests of the Tribes, and to ways in which these interests may be affected by the repository program. Monitoring is needed to describe current conditions among the Affected Tribes' populations, to describe BWIP site characterization activities affecting the Tribes, and to measure any changes in these conditions that may occur as a direct result of site characterization. This paper reports our first efforts at gathering historical information. It summarizes materials contained in two sources: the reports of field agents to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs (1854-1936), and the dockets of the Indian Claims Commission. 24 refs., 3 figs.

Liebow, E.B.; Younger, C.A.; Broyles, J.A.

1987-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Intelligent Sootblowing Demonstration at Texas Glenco's W.A. Parish Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Intelligent sootblowing (ISB) optimizes the cleaning of the walls and convection passes of fossil-fired power plants to maintain high heat transfer while keeping steam temperatures and pressures as constant as possible and minimizing erosion or corrosion of tubes. This document is the second in a series of interim reports on the five-year ISB system test and demonstration project at Texas Genco's W.A. Parish plant. It summarizes ISB performance test results, outage inspection findings, and potential enha...

2003-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

385

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Sonoma County  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

County on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Sonoma County on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Sonoma County on Delicious Rank Better...

386

Summary Report for Bureau of Fisheries Stream Habitat Surveys : Yakima River Basin, 1934-1942, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document contains summary reports of stream habitat surveys, conducted in the Yakima River basin, by the Bureau of Fisheries (BOF, now National Marine Fisheries Service) from 1934-1942. These surveys were part of a larger project to survey streams in the Columbia River basin that provided, or had provided, spawning and rearing habitat for salmon and steelhead (Rich, 1948). The purpose of the survey was, as described by Rich, 'to determine the present condition of the various tributaries with respect to their availability and usefulness for the migration, breeding, and rearing of migratory fishes'. Current estimates of the loss of anadromous fish habitat in the Columbia River Basin are based on a series of reports published from 1949-1952 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The reports were brief, qualitative accounts of over 5000 miles of stream surveys conducted by the BOF from 1934-1946 (Bryant, 1949; Bryant and Parkhurst, 1950; Parkhurst, 1950a-c; Parkhurst et al., 1950). Despite their brevity, these BOF reports have formed the basis for estimating fish habitat losses and conditions in the Columbia River Basin (Fulton, 1968, 1970; Thompson, 1976; NPPC, 1986). Recently, the field notebooks from the BOF surveys were discovered. The data is now archived and stored in the Forest Science DataBank at Oregon State University (Stafford et al., 1984; 1988). These records are the earliest and most comprehensive documentation available of the condition and extent of anadromous fish habitat before hydropower development in the Columbia River Basin. They provide the baseline data for quantifying changes and setting a benchmark for future restoration of anadromous fish habitat throughout the Basin. The summaries in this book are exact replicates of the originals. Due to discrepancies between the field data and the summaries, the database should be used to assess pool and substrate conditions. This data is available from the Bonneville Power Administration. The Bureau of Fisheries survey is unique because it is the only long-term data set that quantifies fish habitat in a manner that is replicable over time; no other similar work is known to exist. Other surveys, such as Thompson and Haas (1960), inventoried extensive areas in a manner that was mostly qualitative, subjectively estimating physical characteristics like bank cover and stream shading. Spawning, rearing, and resting habitat were not systematically quantified to allow comparisons over time. Knowledge of the past and present quantity and quality of anadromous fish habitat in the Columbia River Basin is essential to any effort to enhance fish populations. Habitat condition is a key element in monitoring and evaluating progress towards the doubling goal. Integration of this information into the Columbia River Fish and Wildlife Plan can provide the baseline information to greatly enhance understanding of past, present, and future habitat conditions in the basin to provide for improved management decisions.

McIntosh, Bruce A.; Clark, Sharon E.; Sedell, James R.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

Snohomish County Biodiesel Project  

SciTech Connect

Snohomish County in western Washington State began converting its vehicle fleet to use a blend of biodiesel and petroleum diesel in 2005. As prices for biodiesel rose due to increased demand for this cleaner-burning fuel, Snohomish County looked to its farmers to ???¢????????grow???¢??????? this fuel locally. Suitable seed crops that can be crushed to extract oil for use as biodiesel feedstock include canola, mustard, and camelina. The residue, or mash, has high value as an animal feed. County farmers began with 52 acres of canola and mustard crops in 2006, increasing to 250 acres and 356 tons in 2008. In 2009, this number decreased to about 150 acres and 300 tons due to increased price for mustard seed.

Terrill Chang; Deanna Carveth

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

MINERAL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Board of Board of MINERAL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Telephone: 702-945-2446 Fax: 702-945-0706 P.O. Box 4150 Hawthorne, Nevada 89415 JACKIE WALLIS, Chairman GOVERNING BOARD FOR THE TOWNS OF DAN DILLARD, Vice Chairman HAWTHORNE, LUNING AND MINA BOB LYBARGER, Member LIQUOR BOARD GAMING BOARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington, DC 20585 Dear Sirs: Attached are the comments for modification of the Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry(NOI) provided to the Board of Mineral County Commissioners, in a letter dated January

389

Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Savings Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program Arlington County - Green Building Incentive Program...

390

EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington The purpose of this Supplement Analysis is to determine if a Supplemental EIS is needed to analyze the use of the WDFW's existing Yakima Hatchery for rearing and possibly incubating coho. Additional acclimation and research activities for coho are also analyzed. DOE/EIS-0169-SA-03, Supplement Analysis for Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington (March 2000)

391

EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona 41: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona Summary This EIS, prepared by the Bureau of Land Management with DOE's Western Area Power Administration as a cooperating agency, evaluated the environmental impacts of a proposed wind energy project on public lands in Mohave County, Arizona. Power generated by this project would tie to the electrical power grid through an interconnection to one of Western's transmission lines.The project website is http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/energy/wind/mohave.html. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download Draft EIS posted at http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/energy/wind/mohave/reports/DEIS.html.

392

Santa Clara County - Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Green Building Policy for County Government Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings Santa Clara County - Green Building Policy for County Government Buildings < Back Eligibility Local Government Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Buying & Making Electricity Water Heating Program Info State California Program Type Energy Standards for Public Buildings Provider Santa Clara County Executive's Office In February 2006, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approved a Green Building Policy for all county-owned or leased buildings. The standards were revised again in September 2009. All new buildings over 5,000 square feet are required to meet LEED Silver

393

Property:Building/County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type Page. County Pages using the property "Building/County" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0002 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0003 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0004 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0005 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0006 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0007 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0008 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0009 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0010 + Stockholm County, Sweden + Sweden Building 05K0011 + Stockholm County, Sweden +

394

Pages that link to "Data:87d9d9e8-ef6a-4b34-9dcc-76c639325042...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

| 100 | 250 | 500) Puget Sound Energy Inc ( links) File:SVFullServiceRestaurant Seattle WA Puget Sound Energy Inc.png ( links) File:SVFullServiceRestaurant Yakima WA...

395

Intelligent Sootblowing Demonstration at Texas Genco's W.A. Parish Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Intelligent sootblowing (ISB) optimizes the cleaning of the walls and convection passes of fossil-fired power plants to maintain high heat transfer while keeping steam temperatures and pressures as constant as possible and minimizing erosion or corrosion of tubes. This document is the third in a series of interim reports on the five-year ISB system test and demonstration project at Texas Genco's W.A. Parish plant. Work in 2004 focused on quantifying cost savings associated with the long-term operation of...

2004-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

396

File:EIA-Eastern-OR-WA-BOE.pdf | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eastern-OR-WA-BOE.pdf Eastern-OR-WA-BOE.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Eastern Oregon and Washington By 2001 BOE Reserve Class Size of this preview: 776 × 600 pixels. Full resolution ‎(1,650 × 1,275 pixels, file size: 460 KB, MIME type: application/pdf) Description Eastern Oregon and Washington By 2001 BOE Reserve Class Sources Energy Information Administration Authors Samuel H. Limerick; Lucy Luo; Gary Long; David F. Morehouse; Jack Perrin; Robert F. King Related Technologies Oil, Natural Gas Creation Date 2005-09-01 Extent Regional Countries United States UN Region Northern America States Oregon, Washington File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 18:00, 20 December 2010 Thumbnail for version as of 18:00, 20 December 2010 1,650 × 1,275 (460 KB) MapBot (Talk | contribs) Automated bot upload

397

File:06-WA-b - Washington Construction Storm Water Permit.pdf | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

File File Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » File:06-WA-b - Washington Construction Storm Water Permit.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Metadata File:06-WA-b - Washington Construction Storm Water Permit.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 Go! next page → next page → Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 60 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 2 pages) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 15:28, 6 December 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 15:28, 6 December 2013 1,275 × 1,650, 2 pages (60 KB) Alevine (Talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 December 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 15:25, 6 December 2013 1,275 × 1,650, 2 pages (60 KB) Alevine (Talk | contribs)

398

Property:Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

AddlPlaceCounty AddlPlaceCounty Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty Property Type Page Pages using the property "Incentive/AddlPlaceCounty" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A Allegany County Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Allegany County, Maryland + Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credit (Maryland) + Anne Arundel County, Maryland + Anne Arundel County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Anne Arundel County, Maryland + B Baltimore County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credit (Maryland) + Baltimore County, Maryland + Baltimore County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Baltimore County, Maryland + Brownfield Development Tax Abatements (Alabama) + Alabama + C Calvert County - Wind Ordinance (Maryland) + Calvert County, Maryland +

399

Queen Anne's County- Solar Zoning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Queen Anne's County zoning code allows for ground mounted solar arrays in areas zoned as "open space," "agricultural," and "countryside" districts.

400

Mono County geothermal activity  

SciTech Connect

Three geothermal projects have been proposed or are underway in Mono County, California. The Mammoth/Chance geothermal development project plans to construct a 10-MW geothermal binary power plant which will include 8 production and 3 injection wells. Pacific Lighting Energy Systems is also planning a 10-MW binary power plant consisting of 5 geothermal wells and up to 4 injection wells. A geothermal research project near Mammoth Lakes has spudded a well to provide a way to periodically measure temperature gradient, pressure, and chemistry of the thermal waters and to investigate the space-heating potential of the area in the vicinity of Mammoth Lakes. All three projects are briefly described.

Lyster, D.L.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Stafford County The Kansas County Profile Report is published annually by the Institute for Policy & Social  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Stafford County #12;Foreword The Kansas County Profile Report is published annually to http://www.census.gov. Kansas County Profile Stafford County, Kansas Page 1 of 58 Population DECENNIAL on these classification systems, please refer to http://www.census.gov. Kansas County Profile Stafford County, Kansas Page

Peterson, Blake R.

402

DOE Challenge Home Case Study TC Legend, Seattle, WA, Custom Home  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TC Legend TC Legend Homes Seattle, WA BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE DOE Challenge Home builders are in the top 1% of builders in the country meeting the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Every DOE Challenge Home starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Then, even more advanced technologies are designed in for a home that goes above and beyond current code to give you the superior quality construction, HVAC, appliances, indoor air quality, safety, durability, comfort, and solar-ready components along with ultra-low or no utility bills. This provides homeowners with a quality home that will last for generations to come.

403

DOE Challenge Home Case Study, Dwell Development, Seattle, WA, Systems Home  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dwell Dwell Development Seattle, WA BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE DOE Challenge Home builders are in the top 1% of builders in the country meeting the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Every DOE Challenge Home starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Then, even more advanced technologies are designed in for a home that goes above and beyond current code to give you the superior quality construction, HVAC, appliances, indoor air quality, safety, durability, comfort, and solar-ready components along with ultra-low or no utility bills. This provides homeowners with a quality home that will last for generations to come.

404

Measurements of Turbulence at Two Tidal Energy Sites in Puget Sound, WA  

SciTech Connect

Field measurements of turbulence are pre- sented from two sites in Puget Sound, WA (USA) that are proposed for electrical power generation using tidal current turbines. Rapidly sampled data from multiple acoustic Doppler instruments are analyzed to obtain statistical mea- sures of fluctuations in both the magnitude and direction of the tidal currents. The resulting turbulence intensities (i.e., the turbulent velocity fluctuations normalized by the harmonic tidal currents) are typically 10% at the hub- heights (i.e., the relevant depth bin) of the proposed turbines. Length and time scales of the turbulence are also analyzed. Large-scale, anisotropic eddies dominate the energy spectra, which may be the result of proximity to headlands at each site. At small scales, an isotropic turbulent cascade is observed and used to estimate the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy. Data quality and sampling parameters are discussed, with an emphasis on the removal of Doppler noise from turbulence statistics.

Thomson, Jim; Polagye, Brian; Durgesh, Vibhav; Richmond, Marshall C.

2012-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

405

DOE Challenge Home Case Study, Clifton View Homes, Coupeville, WA, Systems Home  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clifton View Clifton View Homes Coupeville, WA BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE DOE Challenge Home builders are in the top 1% of builders in the country meeting the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specifi ed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Every DOE Challenge Home starts with ENERGY STAR for Homes Version 3 for an energy-effi cient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Then, even more advanced technologies are designed in for a home that goes above and beyond current code to give you the superior quality construction, HVAC, appliances, indoor air quality, safety, durability, comfort, and solar-ready components along with ultra-low or no utility bills. This provides homeowners with a quality home that will last for generations to come.

406

Canasawacta Creek Project: Chenango County, New York  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

County Soil and Water Conservation District, the U.S. ArmyCounty Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) ArmyCounty (NY) soil and Water Conservation District, and as an

OReilly, Mary; MacEwan, David; Greco, Brandon; Nelson, Debra; Long, George; Rowen, John

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County,...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Santa Barbara County, California to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Santa Barbara County, California on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings...

408

Solar Maid Ventura County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search Logo: Solar Maid Ventura County Name Solar Maid Ventura County Place Lancaster, California Sector Solar Product Solar Operations and Maintenance Year founded 2012 Number...

409

Broome County Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Broome County Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Broome County Biomass Facility Facility...

410

Craven County Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Craven County Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Craven County Biomass Facility Facility...

411

Davis County Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Davis County Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Davis County Biomass Facility Facility...

412

Placer County Water Agency | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Placer County Water Agency Jump to: navigation, search Name Placer County Water Agency Place California Utility Id 15127 Utility Location Yes Ownership P NERC Location WECC NERC...

413

RECIPI ENT;Kitsap County u.s. DEPARTlvIENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENT;Kitsap County ENT;Kitsap County u.s. DEPARTlvIENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENT ER NEPA DETERlVITNATION PROJECT TITLE: EECBG * Energy Service Corps (SOW) Page 1 01'2 STATE: WA Funding Opportunity Announcem ent Number DE-FOA..QOOOO13 Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EEOOOO853 '1t;..o -6ObC>g5~- 0(.::)\ EE81128 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the foUowing determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Aclions 10 conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase Ihe indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances, These actions may involve financial and technical

414

County\PAAN  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 1998 9, 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel, GC-52 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 COMMENTS TO THE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT NOTICE OF INQUIRY To whom it may concern: The attached comments by the Clark County, Nevada Department of Comprehensive Planning, Nuclear Waste Division, are in reference to a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) released by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to Section 170p of the Atomic Energy Act. From the perspective of local government and the public, we support continuing the comprehensive provisions of the Price-Anderson Act. The need to have available sufficient financial resources to ameliorate impacts from nuclear incidents will be increasingly important in the future. The potential for accidents, for example, will be

415

350 City County Building  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

(. (. - ,- Department of Eilqgy Washington, DC20585 ,. i x \ .The Honorable Wellington E. Webb .' '. ' 350 City County Building / Denver, Colorado 80202 ., ; Dear Mayor Webb: ., ~, Secretary of Energy' Hazel O'Leary has announced's new approach to openness in the Department of Energy,(OOE) and its communications with the public. In support of this initiative, we,are pleased to forward the'enclosed'information related to the former Uhiversity of Denver Research Institute site in your, jurisdiction that performed work for DOE's predecessor,agencies. This' i~nformation'is provided for your.informatibn, use,,and retention.. ; DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) is responsible for identification of sitesused by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining

416

RECIPIENT:Monroe County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

p,, '~~' p,, '~~' RECIPIENT:Monroe County u.s. DEP . .\RTlVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERJl.1INATION PROJECT TITLE: Landfill Gas Utilization Plant Page 1 01'3 STATE: NY Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pro<:urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number CDP DE-EEOO3123 GFO-O003123-001 EE3123 Based on my review of the infonnation concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA), I have made the following determination : ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.21 Methane The installation, modification, operation, and removal of commercially available methane gas recovery and gas recovery utilization systems installed within a previously disturbed or developed area on or contiguous to an existlng

417

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fayette Fayette County, Pennsylvania to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Fayette County, Pennsylvania on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

418

Gratiot County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Gratiot County Gratiot County Jump to: navigation, search Name Gratiot County Facility Gratiot County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Ivenergy Developer Ivenergy Energy Purchaser Detroit Edison Location Breckenridge MI Coordinates 43.38009947°, -84.4896698° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":43.38009947,"lon":-84.4896698,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

419

Power County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County County Jump to: navigation, search Name Power County Facility Power County Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner CG Power Solutions Developer CG Power Solutions Energy Purchaser PacifiCorp Location American Falls ID Coordinates 42.66135774°, -112.9727554° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.66135774,"lon":-112.9727554,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

420

Geothermal development plan: Yuma county  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

One hot spring and 33 wells drilled in the county discharge water at temperatures sufficient for direct-use geothermal applications such as process heat and space heating and cooling. Currently, one industry within the county has been identified which may be able to use geothermal energy for its process heat requirements. Also, a computer simulation model was used to predict geothermal energy on line as a function of time under both private and city-owned utility development of the resource.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Geothermal Development Plan: Pima County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Pima County is located entirely within the Basin and Range physiographic province in which geothermal resources are known to occur. Continued growth as indicated by such factors as population growth, employment and income will require large amounts of energy. It is believed that geothermal energy could provide some of the energy that will be needed. Potential users of geothermal energy within the county are identified.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Application of a modified denitrifying bacteria method for analyzing groundwater and vadose zone pore water nitrate at the Hanford Site, WA, USA.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

zone pore water nitrate at the Hanford Site, WA, USA. Woods,and Conrad, Mark The Hanford Site in southern WashingtonL have been reported for Hanford groundwaters, where nitrate

Woods, Katharine N.; Singleton, Michael J.; Conrad, Mark

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

A WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY POSTDOCTORAL POSITION FOR WORK AT LIGO HANFORD, WA Applications are invited for a postdoctoral position in the Gravity Group at the Department of Physics  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY POSTDOCTORAL POSITION FOR WORK AT LIGO HANFORD, WA Applications characterization for the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO) at the Hanford site characterization at the LIGO Hanford observatory. Familiarity with data analysis pipelines for searching

Collins, Gary S.

424

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes: Funding for state, city, and county governments in the state includes: Funding for state, city, and county...

425

Anderson County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Anderson County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Anderson County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

426

Androscoggin County, Maine ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Androscoggin County, Maine ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Androscoggin County, Maine ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

427

Allegan County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Allegan County, Michigan ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Allegan County, Michigan ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

428

Becker County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Becker County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Becker County, Minnesota ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

429

Bennington County, Vermont ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bennington County, Vermont ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bennington County, Vermont ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

430

Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Abbeville County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

431

Baltimore County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Baltimore County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Baltimore County, Maryland ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

432

Barnwell County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barnwell County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barnwell County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

433

Berkshire County, Massachusetts ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Berkshire County, Massachusetts ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Berkshire County, Massachusetts ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

434

Arapahoe County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arapahoe County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Arapahoe County, Colorado ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

435

Alexander County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alexander County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alexander County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

436

Albemarle County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Albemarle County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Albemarle County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

437

Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

438

Berks County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Berks County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Berks County, Pennsylvania ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

439

Bayfield County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bayfield County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bayfield County, Wisconsin ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

440

Augusta County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Augusta County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Augusta County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Alamance County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alamance County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alamance County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

442

Archuleta County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Archuleta County, Colorado ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Archuleta County, Colorado ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

443

Allendale County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Allendale County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Allendale County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

444

Barron County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barron County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barron County, Wisconsin ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

445

Baltimore City County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Baltimore City County, Maryland ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Baltimore City County, Maryland ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

446

Berkeley County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Berkeley County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Berkeley County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

447

Alameda County, California ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Alameda County, California ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alameda County,...

448

Bedford County, Tennessee ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bedford County, Tennessee ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bedford County, Tennessee ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

449

Bedford City County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bedford City County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bedford City County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

450

Beaufort County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

History Facebook icon Twitter icon Beaufort County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Beaufort County, North...

451

Audrain County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Audrain County, Missouri ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Audrain County, Missouri ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

452

Anderson County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Anderson County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Anderson County, Kentucky ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

453

Ballard County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ballard County, Kentucky ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Ballard County, Kentucky ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

454

Alleghany County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alleghany County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alleghany County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

455

Aitkin County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Aitkin County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Aitkin County, Minnesota...

456

Barbour County, West Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Barbour County, West Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Barbour County, West Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

457

Beltrami County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Beltrami County, Minnesota ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Beltrami County, Minnesota ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

458

Ashland County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ashland County, Wisconsin ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Ashland County, Wisconsin ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

459

Belknap County, New Hampshire ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Belknap County, New Hampshire ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Belknap County, New Hampshire ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

460

Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Accomack County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Bertie County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bertie County, North Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bertie County, North Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

462

Arlington County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arlington County, Virginia ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Arlington County, Virginia ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate...

463

Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

464

Bamberg County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bamberg County, South Carolina ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Bamberg County, South Carolina ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006...

465

Fairfax County - Green Power Purchase (Virginia) | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2010), wind power accounted for 10% of the general county's annual electricity consumption (and hence, the county met their stated goal of 10% by 2010). Fairfax County does...

466

111th Congressional Districts and Counties | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Districts and Counties Dataset Summary Description This dataset contains a nationwide inventory of all congressional districts and the counties or pieces of counties associated...

467

Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Winnebago County Landfill Gas Biomass Facility Facility Winnebago County Landfill Gas Sector Biomass...

468

PP-118 Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18 Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc PP-118 Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc Presidential permit authorizing Hill County Electric Cooperative Inc to construct, operate, and...

469

Geothermal development plan: Yuma County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Yuma County Area Development Plan evaluated the county-wide market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified four potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 90/sup 0/C (194/sup 0/F), and in addition, two areas are inferred to contain geothermal resources with intermediate (90/sup 0/C to 150/sup 0/C, 194/sup 0/F to 300/sup 0/F) temperature potential. The resource areas are isolated, although one resource area is located near Yuma, Arizona. One resource site is inferred to contain a hot dry rock resource. Anticipated population growth in the county is expected to be 2 percent per year over the next 40 years. The primary employment sector is agriculture, though some light industry is located in the county. Water supplies are found to be adequate to support future growth without advese affect on agriculture. Six firms were found in Yuma County which may be able to utilize geothermal energy for process heat needs. In addition, several agricultural processors were found, concentrated in citrus processing and livestock raising. Geothermal energy utilization projections suggest that by the year 2000, geothermal energy may economically provide the energy equivalent of 53,000 barrels of oil per year to the industrial sector if developed privately. Geothermal utilization projections increase to 132,000 barrels of oil per year by 2000 if a municipal utility developed the resource.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Abundance, Distribution and Estimated Consumption (kg fish) of Piscivorous Birds Along the Yakima River, Washington State; Implications for Fisheries Management, 2002 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report is divided into two chapters. The abstract for chapter one is--Understanding of the abundance and spatial and temporal distributions of piscivorous birds and their potential consumption of fish is an increasingly important aspect of fisheries management. During 1999-2002, we determined the abundance and distribution and estimated the maximum consumption (kg biomass) of fish-eating birds along the length of the Yakima River in Washington State. Sixteen different species were observed during the 4-yr study, but only half of those were observed during all years. Abundance and estimated consumption of fish within the upper and middle sections of the river were dominated by common mergansers (Mergus merganser) which are known to breed in those reaches. Common mergansers accounted for 78 to 94% of the estimated total fish take for the upper river or approximately 28,383 {+-} 1,041 kg over the 4 yrs. A greater diversity of avian piscivores occurred in the lower river and potential impacts to fish populations was more evenly distributed among the species. In 1999-2000, great blue herons potentially accounted for 29 and 36% of the fish consumed, whereas in 2001-2002 American white pelicans accounted for 53 and 55%. We estimated that approximately 75,878 {+-} 6,616 kg of fish were consumed by piscivorous birds in the lower sections of the river during the study. Bird assemblages differed spatially along the river with a greater abundance of colonial nesting species within the lower sections of the river, especially during spring and the nesting season. The abundance of avian piscivores and consumption estimates are discussed within the context of salmonid supplementation efforts on the river and juvenile out-migration. The abstract for chapter two is--Consumption of fish by piscivorous birds may be a significant constraint on efforts to enhance salmonid populations within tributaries to the Columbia River in Washington State. During 1999-2002, we determined the abundance of fish-eating birds, primarily ring-billed (Larus delawarensis) and California (L. californicus) gulls and monitored their behavior at two man-made structures within the Yakima River in eastern Washington: Horn Rapids Dam, a low-head irrigation dam, and the return pipe for the Chandler Juvenile Fish Handling Facility. Earlier observations of congregations of gulls at these structures suggested an increased likelihood of predation of out-migrating juvenile salmonids. We estimated the number of fish consumed and examined the relationship between river flow and gull numbers and fish taken. Numbers of gulls at the structures varied daily between their arrival in Late March-early April and departure in late June (mean ({+-}SE) - Horn Rapids: 11.7 ({+-}2.0), Chandler: 20.1 ({+-}1.5) ). During the 4-yr study, numbers at Horn Rapids peaked dramatically during the last 2 weeks in May (between 132.9 ({+-}4.2) to 36.6 ({+-}2.2) gulls/day) and appeared to the associated with the release of > 1-mil hatchery juvenile fall chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) above the 2 study sites. A comparable peak in gull abundance was not observed at Chandler. Diurnal patterns of gull abundance also varied among years and sites. The relationship between foraging efficiency and gull numbers was not consistent among years or sites. Gull numbers were not correlated with river flow when year was considered. However, variations in flow among years appeared to be associated with average gull numbers at each site, but trends were not consistent between sites. Low seasonal flows were associated with increased predation at Chandler, whereas high seasonal flows were associated with increased predation at Horn Rapids. Assuming all fish taken were salmonids, we estimate gulls consumed between 0.1-10.3 % of the juvenile salmonids passing or being released from the Chandler Juvenile Fish Monitoring Facility located above the two structures. Staggered releases of hatchery fish, nocturnal releases of fish entrained in the Chandler facility, changes in the orientation of the outflow from the f

Major, III, Walter; Grassley, James M.; Ryding, Kristen E. (University of Washington, Quantitive Ecology Program, Seattle, WA)

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

RECIPIENT:Lake County, FL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lake County, FL Lake County, FL u.s. DEPARTIIIEN T OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CEN T ER NEPA DETERlIJJNATION PROJECf TITLE: Lake County, FL EECBG SOW (S) Page lof2 STATE: FL Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Numbcr CID Numbtr OE·FOA-OOOOO13 DE·EE00Q0786.001 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed adion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized undtr DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: ex. EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 65.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conserva tion, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

472

Geothermal development plan: Maricopa county  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Maricopa county is the area of Arizona receiving top priority since it contains over half of the state's population. The county is located entirely within the Basin and Range physiographic region in which geothermal resources are known to occur. Several approaches were taken to match potential users to geothermal resources. One approach involved matching some of the largest facilities in the county to nearby geothermal resources. Other approaches involved identifying industrial processes whose heat requirements are less than the average assessed geothermal reservoir temperature of 110/sup 0/C (230/sup 0/F). Since many of the industries are located on or near geothermal resources, geothermal energy potentially could be adapted to many industrial processes.

White, D.H.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

EIS-0441: Mohave County Wind Farm Project, Mohave County, Arizona  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EIS, prepared by the Bureau of Land Management with DOEs Western Area Power Administration as a cooperating agency, evaluated the environmental impacts of a proposed wind energy project on public lands in Mohave County, Arizona. Power generated by this project would tie to the electrical power grid through an interconnection to one of Westerns transmission lines.

474

Montgomery County, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County is a county in Kentucky. Its FIPS County Code is 173. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Montgomery County,...

475

Carroll County, Tennessee: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County is a county in Tennessee. Its FIPS County Code is 017. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Carroll County,...

476

Knox County, Kentucky: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Knox County is a county in Kentucky. Its FIPS County Code is 121. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Knox County, Kentucky...

477

Better Buildings Partners: Rutland County, Vermont  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Rutland County, Vermont Rutland County, Vermont H.E.A.T. Squad Warms Homeowners up to Energy Efficiency Photo of an ornate historical building, with flowering trees beside it. A...

478

Ashe County- Wind Energy System Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

In 2007 Ashe County adopted a wind ordinance to regulate the use of wind-energy systems in unincorporated areas of the county and to describe the conditions by which a permit for installing such a...

479

Miami Dade County Public School Financing Profile  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Profile of Success Miami-Dade County Public Schools Miami-Dade County Public Schools-Stats at a Glance Finance Vehicle Tax-exempt lease purchase agreement (via master lease)...

480

California Energy Commission - Electricity Consumption by County  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

County (2006-2009) Electricity consumption data from the California Energy Commission sorted by County for Residential and Non-residential from 2006 to 2009.


...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "yakima counties wa" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Baltimore County - Wind Ordinance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baltimore County - Wind Ordinance Eligibility Agricultural Residential Savings For Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Information Maryland Program Type Siting and...

482

San Diego County - Wind Regulations (California) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind Regulations (California) San Diego County - Wind Regulations (California) < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Residential Savings Category Wind Buying & Making...

483

Sullivan County, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Sullivan County, Pennsylvania Dushore, Pennsylvania Eagles Mere, Pennsylvania Forksville, Pennsylvania Laporte, Pennsylvania Retrieved from...

484

San Bernardino County - Green Building Incentive | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

County's http:www.sbcounty.govgreencountysbbuildersgreenbuilding.aspx Green Building program will receive accelerated plan review, priority inspections, design...

485

Aspen & Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Colorado Name Aspen & Pitkin County - Renewable Energy Mitigation Program Incentive Type Building Energy Code Applicable Sector Commercial, Residential Eligible Technologies...

486

Marin County - Green Building Requirements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marin County - Green Building Requirements Marin County - Green Building Requirements Eligibility Commercial Construction Residential Savings For Heating & Cooling Home...

487

Madison County - Wind Energy Systems Ordinance | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Madison County - Wind Energy Systems Ordinance Madison County - Wind Energy Systems Ordinance < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Savings Category...

488

Students from Stafford County University of Kansas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 10/10/12 15:23:31 Students from Stafford County Fall 2012 University of Kansas All Campuses Overall counts include students whose permanent residence or last high school attended is in Stafford from Stafford County. In Fall 2012, KU has 11 students from Stafford County: · 10 undergraduate · 1

Peterson, Blake R.

489

Students from Stafford County University of Kansas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 10/17/11 10:19:19 Students from Stafford County Fall 2011 University of Kansas All Campuses Overall counts include students whose permanent residence or last high school attended is in Stafford students from Stafford County. In Fall 2011, KU has 10 students from Stafford County: · 10 undergraduate KU

Peterson, Blake R.

490

SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ABOVEGROUND OUTDOOR, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES #12;Suffolk County Department of Health Services' Aboveground Outdoor Tank and Associated Piping Design Standards _____________________ 1

Homes, Christopher C.

491

Geothermal development plan: Pima County  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Pima County Area Development evaluated the county-wide market potential for utilizing geothermal energy. The study identified four potential geothermal resource areas with temperatures less than 100{sup 0}C (212{sup 0}F), and in addition, one area is identified as having a temperature of 147{sup 0}F (297{sup 0}F). Geothermal resources are found to occur in Tucson where average population growth rates of two to three percent per year are expected over the next 40 years. Rapid growth in the manufacturing sector and the existence of major copper mines provide opportunities for the direct utilization of geothermal energy. However, available water supplies are identified as a major constraint to projected growth. The study also includes a regional energy analysis, future predictions for energy consumption and energy prices. A major section of the report is aimed at identifying potential geothermal users in Pima County and providing projections of maximum economic geothermal utilization. The study identifies 115 firms in 32 industrial classes that have some potential for geothermal use. In addition, 26 agribusiness firms were found in the county.

White, D.H.; Goldstone, L.A.

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

County Wind Ordinance Standards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

County Wind Ordinance Standards County Wind Ordinance Standards County Wind Ordinance Standards < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Industrial Local Government Residential Savings Category Wind Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State California Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider California Energy Commission [http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_45_bill_200... Assembly Bill 45] of 2009 authorized counties to adopt ordinances to provide for the installation of small wind systems (50 kW or smaller) outside urbanized areas but within the county's jurisdiction. The bill also addressed specific aspects of a typical wind ordinance and established the limiting factors by which a county's wind ordinance can be no more restrictive. Counties may freely make more lenient ordinances, but AB 45

493

Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) Eagle County - Eagle County Efficient Building Code (ECO-Green Build) < Back Eligibility Commercial Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Program Info State Colorado Program Type Building Energy Code Provider Eagle County In an effort to reduce county-wide energy consumption and improve the environment, Eagle County established their own efficient building code (ECO-Green Build) which applies to all new construction and renovations/additions over 50% of the existing floor area of single-family and multifamily residences, and commercial buildings.

494

R[CIPIENT:Loudoun County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Loudoun County Loudoun County u.s. DEPARTl\ IENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\lINATION PROJEcr TITLE: EECBG Funded Projects - SOW (S) Page I of2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pr(l(urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number DE-EEOO00868 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45t.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

495

R[CIPIENT:Pima County  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pima County Pima County u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlHINATION PROJECf TITLE: Activity#13 Garage and Shops Page 1 01'2 STATE: AZ. Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOOD13 DE-EEOOO08S2 GFO-O000852-OO8 0 Based on my review orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA CompliJmce Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45I.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of polentiatly harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

496

Benton County | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Benton County Benton County Place Tennessee Utility Id 1578 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png GSA 1 General Power Commercial GSA 2 General Power Commercial GSA 3 General Power Commercial GSB Industrial General Power Service- TDGSA-VULCAN Industrial Outdoor Lighting Service Lighting RS Residential Residential SMSB Industrial SMSC Industrial SMSD Industrial WS-DE Commercial WS-MTOU Wholesale Average Rates Residential: $0.1030/kWh Commercial: $0.1110/kWh Industrial: $0.0875/kWh References

497

EIS-1069-SA-07: Supplement Analysis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Yakima/Kilickitat Fisheries Project, Noxious Weed Control at Cle Elum and Jack Creek, Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility and Jack Creek Acclimation Site, Kittitas County, Washington

498

EA-1951: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade Transmissio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade Transmission Line, Benton and Yakima Counties, Washington EA-1951: Midway-Moxee Rebuild and Midway-Grandview Upgrade...

499

W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0473)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NRG W.A. PARISH PCCS PROJECT NRG W.A. PARISH PCCS PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX H. BEG MODELING REPORT APPENDIX H BEG MODELING REPORT DOE/EIS-0473 NRG W.A. PARISH PCCS PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX H. BEG MODELING REPORT INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 Reservoir modeling and simulation for estimating migration extents of injectate-CO 2 in support of West Ranch oilfield NEPA/EIS Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin May 4, 2012 Summary It is anticipated that anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2-A) will be injected into the deep (5,000-6,000 ft below sea level) subsurface for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) at the West Ranch oilfield beginning in early 2015. The purpose of this report is to present reservoir modeling and simulation

500

EIS-0461: Hyde County Wind Energy Center Project, Hyde and Buffalo...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

here Home EIS-0461: Hyde County Wind Energy Center Project, Hyde and Buffalo Counties, South Dakota EIS-0461: Hyde County Wind Energy Center Project, Hyde and Buffalo Counties,...