Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Texas Wildlife Damage Management Service Table of Contents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Texas Wildlife Damage Management Service Table of Contents i TEXAS WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGMENT.............................................................................................................................. 2 #12;Texas Wildlife Damage Management Service, Texas A&M University System Page 1 TEXAS WILDLIFE-651-2880 karen.s.dulaney@usda.gov #12;Texas Wildlife Damage Management Service, Texas A&M University System Page

Wilkins, Neal

2

Fish and Wildlife Service | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Service Service Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Fish and Wildlife Service Name Fish and Wildlife Service Place Washington, DC Year founded 1940 Phone number (303) 275-2370 Website http://www.fws.gov/ Coordinates 38.8951118°, -77.0363658° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.8951118,"lon":-77.0363658,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

3

Enforcement Letter, Computer Services, LLC- WEL-2012-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to On Computer Services, LLC, related to an Employee Electrical Shock that occurred in Technical Area 55 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory,

4

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Moves toward Net-Zero Buildings (Fact Sheet)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This fact sheet is an overview of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's net-zero energy visitor's center at the Assabet River National Wildlife.

Not Available

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

Letters  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This letter to the editor takes a deeper look at the March issue's theme of gender diversity in computing. Keywords: letters, Computer, gender, diversity, computer science, education

2013-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

6

Enforcement Letter, West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 Enforcement Letter, West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 March 30, 1998 Issued to West Valley Nuclear Services related to Hazard Analysis, Design Review, Work Control Implementation, and a Contamination Event at the West Valley Demonstration Project This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of West Valley Nuclear Services Company's (WVNS) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance) and 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved inadequate hazards analysis, design review, and implementation of work controls during decontamination activities for a high-level waste tank mobilization pump, was identified by WVNS on

7

US Fish and Wildlife Service lands biomonitoring operations manual  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This is Volume 1 of an operations manual designed to facilitate the development of biomonitoring strategies for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands. It is one component of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands Biomonitoring Operations Manual. The Volume contains the Introduction to the Manual, background information on monitoring, and procedures for developing a biomonitoring strategy for Service lands. The purpose of the Biomonitoring Operations Manual is to provide an approach to develop and implement biomonitoring activities to assess the status and trends of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trust resources. It also provides field sampline methods and documentation protocols for contaminant monitoring activities. The strategy described in the Manual has been designed as a stand alone process to characterize the presence of contaminants on lands managed by the Service. This process can be sued to develop a monitoring program for any tract of real estate with potential threats from on- or off-site contaminants. Because the process was designed to address concerns for Service lands that span the United States from Alaska to the Tropical Islands, it has a generic format that can be used in al types of ecosystems, however, significant site specific informtion is required to complete the Workbook and make the process work successfully.

Rope, R.C.; Breckenridge, R.P.

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

8

Federal Energy Management Program: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service -  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. Fish and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia on AddThis.com...

9

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Shepherdstown, West Virginia October 7, 2013 - 10:09am Addthis Photo of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Conservation Training Center Shepherdstown, West Virginia, is the home of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Conservation Training Center (NCTC). The 500-acre site includes 16 buildings that accommodate education and training facilities for the USFWS. The center was designed to use passive solar and low-energy technologies that are readily available, easily maintained and cost effective. The passive solar design features include an east-west orientation that provides good solar exposure. In winter, large southern windows capture solar gain and brick floors behind windows store heat. Windows are made of

10

Letter Report: Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, Lincoln County, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Pahranagat NWR, Beatty, Rachel, Caliente, Crater Flat, and Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Englebrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

Letter Report Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, Lincoln County, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Pahranagat NWR, Beatty, Rachel, Caliente, Crater Flat, and Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Engelbrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2009-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

12

Enforcement Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC - July 10, 2009 Enforcement Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC - July 10, 2009 July 10, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Y-12 National Security Complex The purpose of this enforcement letter is to communicate the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement concerns with the protection of classified information at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12). A recent Office of Security Enforcement analysis of security incidents identified a number of concerns that warrant prompt attention by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC (B&W Y-12) management to

13

Final Department of Energy US Fish & Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Memorandum of Understanding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

between between THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Regarding Implementation of Executive Order 13186, "Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds" Prepared by: United States Department of Energy and United States Fish and Wildlife Service September 12, 2013 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Regarding Implementation of Executive Order 13186, "Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds" This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into by and between the United States Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) and the United States Department of the Interior,

14

Letter from Pepco Holdings Regarding the Reliability of Electric Service in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from Pepco Holdings Regarding the Reliability of Electric from Pepco Holdings Regarding the Reliability of Electric Service in the District of Columbia Letter from Pepco Holdings Regarding the Reliability of Electric Service in the District of Columbia Docket No. EO-05-01: I am writing to alert you to our concerns regarding the reliability of electricity service for the Nation's Capital in light of the recent shutdown of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia. The plant shutdown has removed a redundancy which is critical to assuring the reliable supply of electricity. Accordingly, we believe that immediate resumption of plant operations, in a manner that balances environmental and electricity reliability concerns, is critical to ensuring reliable electric service to the Nation's Capital.

15

Letter of Intent for RPP Characterization Program Process Engineering and Hanford Analytical Services and Characterization Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Characterization Project level of success achieved by the River Protection Project (RPP) is determined by the effectiveness of several organizations across RPP working together. The requirements, expectations, interrelationships, and performance criteria for each of these organizations were examined in order to understand the performances necessary to achieve characterization objectives. This Letter of Intent documents the results of the above examination. It formalizes the details of interfaces, working agreements, and requirements for obtaining and transferring tank waste samples from the Tank Farm System (RPP Process Engineering, Characterization Project Operations, and RPP Quality Assurance) to the characterization laboratory complex (222-S Laboratory, Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility, and the Hanford Analytical Service Program) and for the laboratory complex analysis and reporting of analytical results.

ADAMS, M.R.

2000-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

16

Analysis and Mapping of Vegetation and Habitat for the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lakeview, Oregon, office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) contracted Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to classify vegetation communities on Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge in northeastern Nevada. The objective of the mapping project was to provide USFWS refuge biologists and planners with detailed vegetation and habitat information that can be referenced to make better decisions regarding wildlife resources, fuels and fire risk, and land management. This letter report describes the datasets and methods used to develop vegetation cover type and shrub canopy cover maps for the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge. The two map products described in this report are (1) a vegetation cover classification that provides updated information on the vegetation associations occurring on the refuge and (2) a map of shrub canopy cover based on high-resolution images and field data.

Tagestad, Jerry D.

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

DOE Response to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Comments on Clipper...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Phase.paragraph4. The DEA statesthat the proposed lattice-type meteorological tower will be 240 feet tall and will be supported by three setsof guy wires. The Service...

18

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Enforcement » Enforcement Letters Services » Enforcement » Enforcement Letters Enforcement Letters Documents Available for Download November 27, 2013 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-04 Issued to National Renewable Energy Laboratory related to a drum rupture and flash event of the Thermochemical User Facility. July 30, 2013 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 Issued to Wastren Advantage, Inc. related to the Loss of Supplied Breathing Air in the Box Breakdown Area of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 29, 2013 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-01

19

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Moves toward Net-Zero Buildings (Fact Sheet), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

refuge showcases wetland areas and forests that are home to a myriad of migra- refuge showcases wetland areas and forests that are home to a myriad of migra- tory birds and other wildlife. The design team's vision became a reality when the new visitor's center opened its doors in 2010. The 5,879-square foot building provides a starting point for visi- tors to to learn about the wildlife on the refuge. The facility also houses hands-on exhibits, office and classroom space, and a nature-themed store. "The design of this visitor center exemplifies the U.S. Fish and Wildlife's commitment to lowering our carbon footprint," said Libby Herland, Project Leader, Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex. "We want this center to help promote the importance of environmental stewardship and connect the public with the beauty

20

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Acquisition Regulation Date May 25, 2001 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the Procurement Executives of DOE and NNSA. Subject: COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WHISTLEBLOWER ACTIONS References: DEAR 931.205-47(h) DEAR 952.216-7, Alt II DEAR 970.3102-05-47(h) DEAR 970.5232-2, Payments and Advances When Does this Acquisition Letter Expire? This Acquisition Letter will expire when this guidance is distributed as an Acquisition Guide section or otherwise superseded. Whom Do You Contact for More Information? Contact Terry Sheppard of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 586-8193 or terry.sheppard@hq.doe.gov Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for information on Acquisition Letters and other policy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Division Sponsor Letter  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

SAMPLE FUNDRAISING LETTER This letter may be used by Annual Meeting session chairs when soliciting funds

22

Wildlife Diseases  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Some wildlife diseases can be transmitted to humans. This leaflet explains the causes and symptoms of rabies, giardiasis, bubonic plague, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Lyme disease, tularemia, leptospirosis and histoplasmosis.

Texas Wildlife Services

2007-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

23

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACQUISITION LETTER ACQUISITION LETTER AUTHORITY This Acquisition Letter (AL) is issued by the Procurement Executive pursuant to a delegation from the Secretary and under the authority of the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) subsection 901.301-70. CONTENTS CITATION TITLE DEAR Part 933 Protests, Disputes, and Appeals I. Purpose. This AL establishes policy and provides guidance for the use of alternative dispute resolution techniques in connection with disputes that arise under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) of 1978, 41 U.S.C. sections 601-613. This AL revision deletes references to "district court" which were incorrectly cited in paragraph four of the Policy section. II. Background. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a range of procedures

24

Post-Closure Land Jurisdiction Transfer to the US Fish and Wildlife Service at Rocky Flats: Surviving the Safari Through Old Records and Other Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Rocky Flats Site (Rocky Flats), located near Denver, Colorado, was listed on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act National Priorities List (NPL) in 1989. Subsequent cleanup and closure activities were completed in October 2005 and the final remedy was selected in September 2006. The remedy is 'no further action' for the generally un-impacted Peripheral Operable Unit (OU), formerly known as the Buffer Zone, and institutional and physical controls with continued monitoring for the Central OU, formerly the industrialized area. The Peripheral OU has been deleted from the NPL and jurisdiction over the majority of land in that OU (3,953 acres) was transferred to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on July 12, 2007, to establish the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge. The remaining approximately 929 acres in the Peripheral OU were retained by DOE's Office of Legacy Management where outstanding mineral leases and mining operations exist. As mineral rights are purchased or mining operations and mineral leases are completed and fully reclaimed, jurisdiction of portions of the 929 acres will also be transferred to USFWS for inclusion into the refuge. During the almost 2 years since cleanup and closure work was completed at Rocky Flats, DOE and USFWS have worked the specific legal parameters, timing, and constraints of the 3,953-acre transfer. Many lessons have been learned, based on these early experiences. (authors)

Schiesswohl, S. [U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management, Westminster, CO (United States); Hanson, M. [S.M. Stoller Corporation, Westminster, CO (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Keeping Idaho's Wildlife Heritage Equal Opportunity Employer 208-334-3700 Fax: 208-334-2114 Idaho Relay (TDD) Service: 1-800-377-3529 http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Keeping Idaho's Wildlife Heritage Equal Opportunity Employer · 208-334-3700 · Fax: 208-334-2114 · Idaho Relay (TDD) Service: 1-800-377-3529 · http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/ IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 600 South Walnut/P.O. Box 25 C.L. "Butch" Otter / Governor Boise, Idaho 83707 Cal Groen / Director

26

Enforcement Letter - Rocky Flats  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2000 1, 2000 Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Highway 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of noncompliance report number NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-2000-0005, which describes noncompliances with the design and procurement requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(iii) requires that procured items and services shall meet established requirements and perform as required; 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(ii) requires that design work including changes, shall incorporate applicable requirements and design bases; 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(iv) requires that inspection and testing of specified items, services, and processes shall be conducted

27

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

No. 2009-04 No. 2009-04 Acquisition Regulation Date 02/12/09 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Management of Excess Weapons Inventories and Selective Sensitive Equipment. References: 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 109-1, Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Property Management Regulations 48 CFR 52.245-1, Government Property DOE Guide 580.1-1, DOE Personal Property Management Guide DOE Order 580.1-1, DOE Personal Property Management, Contractor Requirements Document (CRD), Attachment 2, as set forth in the DOE O 580.1 Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation 970.5245-1, Property Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 45, Government Property

28

Enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2003 10, 2003 Mr. John Christian [ ] BNFL, Inc. East Tennessee Technology Park Portal No. 8, Building K-761 P.O. Box 5689 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Subject: Enforcement Letter- Noncompliance Tracking System Reports and May 14-15, 2003, Price-Anderson Amendments Act Program Review Dear Mr. Christian: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) review of the facts and circumstances related to several Price-Anderson noncompliances, which are documented in the following Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports * NTS-ORO--BNFL-K33-2003-0001, "Weaknesses in BNFL's Issue Screening Process to Determine PAAA Noncompliance." This report documents that the BNFL PAAA Review Board failed to correctly identify and report the vast majority of

29

Enforcement Letter - Idaho  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 1999 0, 1999 Mr. Steve Laflin [ ] International Isotopes Idaho Inc. 2325 West Broadway, Suite D Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-ID--LITC-TRA-1999-0001) Dear Mr. Laflin: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the relocation of an irradiated [isotope] pellet from within a hot cell to an adjoining, outside, charging port service area. This incident occurred on January 6, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is utilized by International Isotopes Idaho Inc. (I4) for the preparation of irradiated materials for distribution. During March 23-24, 1999, DOE conducted an investigation to determine

30

RFP Invitation Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Invitation Letter (Rev. 5, 11/22/10) Invitation Letter (Rev. 5, 11/22/10) Page 1 of 3 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Acquisition Services Management (ASM) Division Subcontracts, ASM-SUB P.O. Box 1663, Mail Stop D447 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 505-665-3814 E-mail: dknox@lanl.gov Date: August 7, 2013 Subject: Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms / Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 241314 Greetings: Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) invites you to submit a Fixed Price proposal for the Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms. The procurement of these two (2) platforms is in support of the following: a. The New Mexico Alliance for Computing at Extreme Scales (ACES), residing within:  Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and

31

Enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2002 9, 2002 Mr. Alan Parker [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Highway 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Subject: Building [ ] Uptake Event of October 5, 2001 Dear Mr. Parker: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's evaluation of facts and circumstances concerning the October 2001 unplanned uptakes of radioactive material by two Radiological Control Technicians (RCT) in Building [ ]. These issues were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff (NTS-RFO--KHLL-[ ] 2002-0001) on February 11, 2002. One RCT received a committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE) of 1.6 rem, and the remaining RCT received 240 millirem (mrem) CEDE. While these exposures do not

32

Letter: Meyerhofer  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This letter confirms that the Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE) was an important part of the FY10 NIF Polar Drive Exploding Pusher experiments on the National Ignition Facility (NIF). These experiments were designed by LLE to produce requested neutron yields to calibrate and qualify nuclear diagnostics. LLE built a deuterium-tritium filling system for the glass shells and provided them to LLNL for mounting. In FY10, four exploding pusher implosions were performed with measured neutron yields within a factor of two of requested and ion temperatures within 20% of requested. These implosions are proving to be an ideal platform for commissioning the nuclear diagnostic suite on the NIF and are achieving all of the objectives planned for this campaign.

Mackinnon, A J

2011-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

33

Wildlife Management Plan for the Oak Ridge Reservation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

...31 APPENDIX A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY...

34

Analysis of a 10-Percent RPS - Response letter summarizing principal conclusions of supplement  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

Transmittal letter for the supplement to the Service Report 'Analysis of a 10-Percent RenewablePortfolio Standard'

Alan Beamon

2003-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

35

San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge Well 10  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), at the request of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, evaluated the water production capacity of an artesian well in the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona. Water from the well initially flows into a pond containing three federally threatened or endangered fish species, and water from this pond feeds an adjacent pond/wetland containing an endangered plant species.

Ensminger, J.T.; Easterly, C.E.; Ketelle, R.H.; Quarles, H.; Wade, M.C.

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Enforcement Letter - KHLL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site P.O. Box 464 Golden, CO 80402-0464 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report: NTS-RFO--KHLL-771OPS-1997-0002 Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of...

37

Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2003 12, 2003 Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair INEEL Citizens Advisory Board North Wind, Inc. 545 Shoup Avenue, Suite 200 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 Dear Mr. Wilson: In response to your letter of November 21, 2003, regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs), I first want to assure you that the Department of Energy views the SSABs as crucial to accomplishing our cleanup mission. The SSABs represent a strong commitment by the Department to continue its relationship with communities surrounding the EM sites by considering community concerns and values in the Department's decision-making process. Your letter makes a persuasive case for using short-term option # 1: "Execute DOE Support Services Contract w/ a

38

NNSA POLICY LETTER  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

POLICY LETTER Approved: 12-11-13 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of the Administrator NAP-26 CONTROLLED COPIES AVAILABLE AT: INITIATED BY:...

39

Letter of Support  

Management & Sponsors ... Our office will prepare a letter for ... and confirms LLNL's commitment to collaboration via a DOE approved mechanism if ...

40

Appendix A. Request Letter  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall Appendix A. Request Letter U.S. Energy Information...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Fish and Wildlife Response Letter for Clipper Windpower Project...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

includes one 262-foot tall wind turbine and associatedfacilities including a 240-foot tall meteorological tower (lattice- guyed type), 400 square foot building, and underground...

42

Wind Powering America Webinar: Wind and Wildlife Interactions | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Wildlife Interactions and Wildlife Interactions Wind Powering America Webinar: Wind and Wildlife Interactions November 23, 2011 - 2:08pm Addthis This webinar is part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America 2011 webinar series. This webinar will provide an overview of wind turbine and wildlife issues, including a summary of research plans by the American Wind and Wildlife Institute. Other topics will include an update of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wind regulations and bat/wind turbine interactions. The webinar is free; no registration is required. More Addthis Related Articles Wind Powering America Webinar: Wind Power Economics: Past, Present, and Future Trends DOE Announces Webinar on Tying Energy Efficiency to Compensation and Performance Reviews, and More

43

Nuisance Wildlife Education and Prevention Plan for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

This document outlines a plan for management of nuisance wildlife at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Nuisance wildlife management includes wildlife population control through hunting, trapping, removal, and habitat manipulation; wildlife damage control; and law enforcement. This plan covers the following subjects: (1) roles and responsibilities of individuals, groups, and agencies; (2) the general protocol for reducing nuisance wildlife problems; and (3) species-specific methodologies for resolving nuisance wildlife management issues for mammals, birds, snakes, and insects. Achievement of the objectives of this plan will be a joint effort between the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA); U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)-Wildlife Services (WS); and ORNL through agreements between TWRA and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE); DOE and UT-Battelle, LLC; and UT-Battelle, LLC; and USDA, APHIS-WS.

Giffen, Neil R [ORNL

2007-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recommendations & Letters EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-03 Included recommendations, letters, and other related...

45

Wildlife at Brookhaven National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wildlife at Brookhaven Wildlife Protection The Laboratory has precautions in place to protect on-site habitats and natural resources. Activities to eliminate or minimize negative...

46

Wildlife Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wildlife Resources Jump to: navigation, search Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleWildlifeResources&oldid612286" Category: NEPA Resources What links here...

47

ORR Wildlife Management Update (2/5/2010)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Wildlife Services: * Recorded goose distress calls. * Laser light. * Radio-controlled boat. 35 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy ORNL Goose Chaser - The...

48

JEA Letter of Interest 2007  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3222007 RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST PURPOSE AND SCOPE JEA is requesting Letters of Interest (LOI) from companies interested in providing renewable...

49

Forest Preserve Wildlife  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Forest Preserve Wildlife Forest Preserve Wildlife Nature Bulletin No. 437-A December 11, 1971 Forest Preserve District of Cook County George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Supt. of Conservation FOREST PRESERVE WILDLIFE The Forest Preserve District now comprises about 62,512 acres of native landscape, mostly wooded, acquired and held as the statute prescribes: for the purpose of protecting the flora, fauna and scenic beauties in their natural state and condition as nearly as may be. It is a huge wildlife sanctuary wherein no weapon may be carried and no hunting, trapping or molestation of any mammal or bird is permitted. Aside from fish management, the wildlife has been left alone to work out its own systems of checks and balances. There has been no attempt to remove surplus populations; no control of any predator other than wild cats and dogs. None is needed. Dead or hollow trees have been allowed to stand, or lie where they fall, because they furnish homes for many kinds of wildlife and go back into the soil to maintain the health of the woodland. There has been considerable reforestation of open tracts formerly farmed and, in some areas, planting of shrubs and vines which provide food for wildlife.

50

Oil Spills and Wildlife  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oil Spills and Wildlife Name: jess Location: NA Country: NA Date: NA Question: what are some effects of oil spills on plants? Replies: The effects of oil spills over the last...

51

Wildlife's Winter Diet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wildlife's Winter Diet Wildlife's Winter Diet Nature Bulletin No. 659 December 9, 1961 Forest Preserve District of Cook County George W. Dunne, President Roland F, Eisenbeis, Supt. of Conservation WILDLIFE'S WINTER DIET Anyone who regularly feeds wild birds, and counts up the amount of food that they eat in the course of a winter, often wonders how they could get along without his help. In one day of freezing weather two or three dozen small birds commonly clean up a half pound of food -- suet, sunflower seed, cracked corn or small grain. This does not take into account raids by squirrels and rabbits. Winter in this region is a time of food crisis for all warm-blooded wildlife. Most of our summer song birds, especially the insect eaters, avoid cold by migrating to warm climates until spring. Likewise, most waterfowl and shorebirds go south during the months when our waters are locked in ice.

52

Preserved Access to Abstract Letter Identities Despite Abolished Letter . . .  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this paper, we discuss the letter processing difficulties of a patient (MS) with pure alexia after left hemisphere stroke who is unable to read any words aloud despite preserved writing and good performance at naming orally spelled words. MS is completely unable to name visually presented letters even though she can name them when they are presented in other modalities. Despite her poor naming, she can distinguish correctly oriented letters from mirror reversals and can perform accurate cross-case matching of visually presented letters. It, therefore, appears that MS is able to access the abstract identity of visually presented letters despite her total inability to name them. This is a more precise form of letter processing impairment than that which has been reported in previous cases of pure alexic patients who are unable to name visually presented letters [Caplan, L.R., & HedleyWhite, T. (1974). Cueing and memory function in alexia without agraphia: a case report. Brain, 115, 251-262; Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1998). Varieties of pure alexia: the case of failure to access graphemic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 203-238; Sevush, S., & Heilman, K.M. (1984). A case of literal alexia. Brain & Language, 22, 92-108]. It suggests that representations of the graphemic identities of letters used in reading are either modality specific or else they are hemisphere specific [Saffran, E.M., & Coslett, H.B. (1998). Implicit vs. letter-by-letter reading in pure alexia: a tale of two systems. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 141-165]. Her letter processing impairment also appears to be different from that observed in a letter-by-letter reader [Perri, R., Bartolomeo, P., & Silveri, M.C. (1996). Letter dyslexia in a letter-by-letter reader. Brain & Language, 53,...

R. Mycroft; J. R. Hanley B; J. Kay A

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 5, 2004 May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to Radiological Work Practices at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory April 19, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 19, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Employee Reprisal at the Savannah River Site April 1, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - April 1, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel Nevada related to Noncompliances with Occupational Radiation Protection and Quality Assurance Requirements at the Nevada Test Site March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Concrete

54

Enforcement Letter - Chicago  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Shirley Strum-Kenny Shirley Strum-Kenny [ ] Stony Brook University Hospital Administration Building, Room 310 Stony Brook, NY 11794-0701 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-CH-BH-BNL-BNL-1998-0004) EA-1999-02 Dear Dr. Strum-Kenny: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning an event at the Radiation Therapy Facility (RTF) occurring in March 1998. In November 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine whether violations of DOE's nuclear safety rules associated with the event had occurred. The resulting Investigation Summary Report was transmitted to you on February 19, 1999. On March 11, 1999, you participated in an Enforcement Conference, along with Brookhaven Science Associates (BSA) management, to discuss the occurrence, its

55

CA IOUs Comment Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2012 June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers.

56

Enforcement Letter - Idaho  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2000 2000 Dr. Bernard L. Meyers [ ] Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 1625, MS 3898 Idaho Falls, ID 83414 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Meyers: This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE) regarding noncompliances with requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) occurring at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). The investigation reviewed five issues reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC (BBWI) and two Quality Program assessment reports. Two of the NTS reports involved specific events that occurred before October 1, 1999, when BBWI began operating INEEL but was responsible for implementing corrective actions. The remaining three reports involved programmatic

57

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24, 2001 24, 2001 Ms. M.P. Delozier [ ] CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. MSIN: H6-08 2440 Stevens Center Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Ms. Delozier: This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE), regarding potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830, "Nuclear Safety Management," occurring at the Hanford Tank Farms. The investigation reviewed three issues that were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. Two of the NTS reports involve the failure to perform the Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) for [ ] gas monitoring. The initial potential noncompliance occurred in January 2000, in which a Zip Cord was installed in a catch tank without first monitoring for [ ]

58

Enforcement Letter - Chicago  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16, 2002 16, 2002 Dr. Peter Paul, [ ] Brookhaven Science Associates Brookhaven National Laboratory Building 460 P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Paul: This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of three reports of noncompliances with quality assurance and/or occupational radiation protection provisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). These issues, described below, were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff and involved procurement and/or control of radioactive sources. 1. On January 19, 2001, BNL reported that an [radioactive] neutron source in an unlabeled package had been moved from a posted High Radiation Area to radiologically controlled

59

Letters.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Kiran Patel Kiran Patel Department of Energy Washington , DC 20585 January 25, 20 10 AAAA World Import-Export, Inc. 7800 NW 29th Street Miami, FL 33122-1104 Dear Mr. Patel, The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the AAAA World Import-Export compact Ouorescent lamps (CFLs), models HS14BX3 and HS14CL3, will be di squalified from the ENERGY STAR Program, etfective today, January 25, 2010. The disqualification of these products is a result of the PEARL Cycle 9 testing indicating the products failed to meet ENERGY STAR criteria (as noted in the letter to your supplier, Xiamen Longstar, dated Novemher 2, 2009, from Richard Karney, ENERGY STAR Products Manager). When a product is disqualified from the ENERGY STAR program, all corresponding packaging and your supplier's product will be

60

Enforcement Letter - KHLL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site P.O. Box 464 Golden, CO 80402-0464 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report: NTS-RFO--KHLL-771OPS-1997-0002 Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of Energy=s (DOE) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The potential noncompliances involved inadequate implementation of work controls, specifically failure of workers to perform required surveillance of the Fire Protection System. The failure to fully perform the required surveillance was identified by Safe Sites of Colorado (SSOC) on June 2, 1997, and reported to DOE in the subject Noncompliance Tracking System report on June 26, 1997.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Enforcement Letter - WSRC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2003 4, 2003 Robert A. Pedde, [ ] Westinghouse Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Building 703-A/Room A203 Aiken, SC 29808 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Criticality Safety Violations (NTS-SR-WSRC- HCAN-2002-0001) Dear Mr. Pedde: This letter addresses Criticality Safety Violations that have occurred at the H-Canyon facility during a 15-month period from February 2002 through June 2003. The DOE Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these violations and is dismayed that they are both programmatic and recurring in nature. Indeed, in one case a criticality safety defense noncompliant condition existed since November 1996. Our review of these events identified multiple work process deficiencies that contributed to

62

Enforcement Letter - Idaho  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dr. Bernard L. Meyers Dr. Bernard L. Meyers [ ] Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 1625, MS 3898 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-ID--BBWI-TRA-1999-0001) Dear Dr. Meyers: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the contamination of personnel while performing a hot cell exhaust system filter replacement. This incident occurred on July 21, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's (INEEL) Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is used by International Isotopes Idaho, Inc. (I4) for the preparation of irradiated materials for commercial distribution. During February 29 through March 2, 2000, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear

63

Enforcement Letter - ELBN022603  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2003 26, 2003 Mr. Frederick A. Tarantino [ ] Bechtel Nevada 2621 Losee Road North Las Vegas, NV 89030-4129 Subject: Enforcement Letter - Bechtel Nevada Authorization Basis Noncompliances Dear Mr. Tarantino: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) review of the facts and circumstances related to certain nuclear safety noncompliances during 2002 at the Nevada Test Site. These noncompliances were identified in the process of conducting a limited Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) Program Review of Bechtel Nevada during November 14-15, 2002, by DOE's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE), in coordination with DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). These matters are being called to your attention through this

64

Enforcement Letter - Argonne West  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 1999 9, 1999 Mr. John I. Sackett [ ] Argonne National Laboratory-West P.O. Box 2528 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403-6000 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-CH-AA-ANLW-ANLW-1998-0001) Dear Mr. Sackett: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning two incidents occurring in June and August 1998 at Argonne National Laboratory - West's (ANLW) Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF): dropping a fuel basket assembly containing chopped fuel elements and repair of a manipulator seal tube. During November 2-3, 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear safety regulations may have been associated with these incidents. A copy of the investigation summary report is

65

NNSA POLICY LETTER  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

POLICY LETTER POLICY LETTER Approved: 6-20-13 WEAPON QUALITY POLICY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of Defense Programs NAP-24 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://hq.na.gov Weapon Quality Division THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NAP-24 1 6-20-13 WEAPON QUALITY POLICY 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this document, NNSA Weapon Quality Policy (NAP-24), is to identify the quality requirements applicable to weapon activities of the NNSA, NNSA contractors and subcontractors. The requirements contained herein are in addition to the scope of quality requirements found in DOE Order 414.1D, Quality Assurance. NAP-24 establishes specific weapon and weapon-related product focused quality requirements for designing, producing and

66

NNSA POLICY LETTER  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

POLICY LETTER POLICY LETTER Approved: 12-11-13 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of the Administrator NAP-26 CONTROLLED COPIES AVAILABLE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.nnsa.energy.gov Office of Quality Management THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NAP-26 1 12-11-13 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 1. PURPOSE. Establish, implement, maintain, assess, and improve the Quality Management System (QMS) for NNSA Federal operations in compliance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standard Requirements document (ISO 9001:2008), Quality Management Systems, and in accordance with DOE Order 414.1, Quality Assurance. 2. CANCELLATION. None. 3. APPLICABILITY. a. The provisions of this NNSA Policy document apply to all the NNSA's Federal

67

Enforcement Letter - ELBNI032504  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25, 2004 25, 2004 Mr. J. P. Henschel [ ] Bechtel National Inc. 3000 George Washington Way Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Concrete Work Issues Dear Mr. Henschel: This letter addresses eleven instances that have occurred at the Waste Treatment Plant during a 14-month period form August 2002 through October 2003 in which concrete work was not performed to established procedures and standards. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these concrete work issues and is concerned with the work process you have in place to inspect concrete work prior to pour. In addition, OE is concerned with your failure to correct these known problems in a timely manner. It is our expectation that Bechtel

68

Plant Award Application Letter | ENERGY STAR Buildings & Plants  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Application Letter Application Letter Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing buildings Commercial new construction Industrial energy management Small business Service providers Service and product providers Verify applications for ENERGY STAR certification Design commercial buildings Energy efficiency program administrators Commercial and industrial program sponsors Associations State and local governments Federal agencies Tools and resources Training In This Section Campaigns Commercial building design Communications resources Energy management guidance Financial resources Portfolio Manager Products and purchasing Recognition Research and reports Service and product provider (SPP) resources Success stories Target Finder Technical documentation

69

Malheur River Wildlife Mitigation Project, Annual Report 2003.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Hydropower development within the Columbia and Snake River Basins has significantly affected riparian, riverine, and adjacent upland habitats and the fish and wildlife species dependent upon them. Hydroelectric dams played a major role in the extinction or major loss of both anadromous and resident salmonid populations and altered instream and adjacent upland habitats, water quality, and riparian/riverine function. Hydroelectric facility construction and inundation directly affected fish and wildlife species and habitats. Secondary and tertiary impacts including road construction, urban development, irrigation, and conversion of native habitats to agriculture, due in part to the availability of irrigation water, continue to affect wildlife and fish populations throughout the Columbia and Snake River Basins. Fluctuating water levels resulting from facility operations have created exposed sand, cobble, and/or rock zones. These zones are generally devoid of vegetation with little opportunity to re-establish riparian plant communities. To address the habitat and wildlife losses, the United States Congress in 1980 passed the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Act) (P.L. 96-501), which authorized the states of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington to create the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council). The Act directed the Council to prepare a program in conjunction with federal, state, and tribal wildlife resource authorities to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife species affected by the construction, inundation and operation of hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin (NPPC 2000). Under the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Program), the region's fish and wildlife agencies, tribes, non-government organizations (NGOs), and the public propose fish and wildlife projects that address wildlife and fish losses resulting from dam construction and subsequent inundation. As directed by the Council, project proposals are subjected to a rigorous review process prior to receiving final approval. An eleven-member panel of scientists referred to as the Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) examines project proposals. The ISRP recommends project approval based on scientific merit. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA), Council staff, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and subbasin groups also review project proposals to ensure each project meets regional and subbasin goals and objectives. The Program also includes a public involvement component that gives the public an opportunity to provide meaningful input on management proposals. After a thorough review, the Burns Paiute Tribe (BPT) acquired the Malheur River Mitigation Project (Project) with BPA funds to compensate, in part, for the loss of fish and wildlife resources in the Columbia and Snake River Basins and to address a portion of the mitigation goals identified in the Council's Program (NPPC 2000).

Ashley, Paul

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Enforcement Letter ELPNL050404  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2004 5, 2004 Dr. Leonard K. Peters, [ ] Batelle Memorial Institute Pacific Northwest Division P.O. Box 999 902 Battelle Blvd. Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Peters: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-RL-- PNNL-PNNLNUCL-2003-0004. Our evaluation included review of the causal analysis, corrective actions, additional supporting information, and discussion with Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL) personnel. The subject NTS report described multiple deficiencies identified through a DOE-RL assessment of contamination control and survey practices associated with

71

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 20, 2010 January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Isotek Systems, LLC related to Quality Assurance Issues associated with the U233 Material Downblending and Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC related to a Failed Scram Event at the Neutron Radiography Reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory July 13, 2009 Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc., related to a Form Wood Timber Fire at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site

72

Enforcement Letter - Hanford - 04/16/2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2002 6, 2002 Mr. Kent A. Campbell [ ] Fluor Federal Services 1200 Jadwin Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Campbell: This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of a December 18, 2001, report of noncompliances with the information requirement provision of 10 CFR 820.11. The noncompliances, described below, were identified by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and involve employees of your company. 10 CFR 820.11 requires that any information pertaining to a nuclear activity provided to DOE or maintained for inspection by DOE shall be complete and accurate in all material respects. This provision applies to documentation associated with personnel training requirements for access to nuclear facilities.

73

Office of Enforcement - Enforcement Letters  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(WEL-2013-02) Nuclear Safety Enforcement Letter issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program...

74

EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-17) Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Management Program EIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 13, 2001 September 13, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-17) Joe HeHerrera - KEWU Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Eagle Lakes Ranch Acquisition and Restoration Project No: 2000-025-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): Resource Acquisition Techniques - 1.1 Fee-Title Acquisition Location: Franklin County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Columbia National Wildlife Refuge Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to partially fund the acquisition of 7,630 acres

75

Physical Review Letters.  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HIGHLIGHT of our most recent work to be published shortly in HIGHLIGHT of our most recent work to be published shortly in Physical Review Letters. We prepared a range of well characterized samples by the sol-gel method developed in our laboratory. By careful doping we controlled the divalent doping (in one set of samples) and the oxygen content (in the second set). We measured the temperature dependent magnetotransport behaviour of these complex oxides. The electronic structure of these well characterized samples was measured by electron energy-loss spectroscopy using the newly installed CM200/FEG microscopes. No discernible change in the Mn L3,2 edges were observed either as a function of doping or oxygen content. However, the O-K edge(1s->2p transitions) intensity, sensitive to the 2p hole density on oxygen sites, varied systematically

76

Enforcement Letter - KHLLC081204  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Ms. Nancy Tuor, [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC 10808 Highway 93 Unit B Golden, CO 80403-9200 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Water Treatment System Breach and Foam Fire Dear Ms. Tuor: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed the details and circumstances regarding two recent site events: the Building 771 unauthorized breach of the Water Treatment System in December 2003; and the February 2004 Building 991 foam fire. Both of these events represent significant breakdowns in your safety programs. Additionally, the general failure to adequately recognize hazards and implement effective controls observed in association with the Building 991 foam fire was an underlying deficiency in the 2003 Building 371 glovebox fire, for which this office has

77

Enforcement Letter - ELMOUND1222041  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Mr. John G. Lehew, [ ] CH2M Hill Mound, Inc 1 Mound Road P.O. Box 3030 Miamisburg, OH 45343-3030 Subject: Enforcement Letter-Spread of Contamination during Group 9 Waste Line Remediation Dear Mr. Lehew: My office has completed an evaluation of the facts and circumstances relating to the contamination event reported in the above subject. On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, several employees working in the soil contamina tion area (SCA) were unnecessarily contaminated with radioactive material as they traversed the SCA. The employees were assisting in the removal of a concrete encased underground radioactive material waste line. Documentation for the removal of prior sections of the waste line in potential release

78

Oregon Fire Marshall Letter  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

and E85 fuel ethanol fuel specification, dispensers, and E85 fuel ethanol fuel specification, dispensers, and dispenser labeling requirements This is a summary of Oregon's biofuel (biodiesel, biodiesel blends, and E85 fuel ethanol) regulations and dispenser labeling requirements. Please refer to OAR 603-027-0410 thru OAR 603-027-0490 for the complete regulation. In addition, we try to answer some common questions about dispensers permitted for use with biofuels. Due to the unique characteristics of these fuels, certain precautions must be taken. Some dispensers commonly used for gasoline and petroleum diesel are not to be used for biodiesel and E85. Biodiesel Identification of product. Biodiesel and biodiesel blends shall be identified by the capitol letter "B" followed by the numerical value representing the volume percentage of biodiesel fuel. For

79

Enforcement Letter ELWSRC041904  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19, 2004 19, 2004 Mr. Robert A. Pedde, [ ] Westinghouse Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Building [ ]/Room [ ] Aiken, SC 29808 Subject: Enforcement Letter Addressing Employee Reprisal (NTS-SR-WSRC-CLOSEGEN-2003-0001) Dear Mr. Pedde: On October 13, 2003, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) reported a noncompliance into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) involving an employee reprisal. The employee was terminated from WSRC after raising safety-related issues and procedural violations while positions in his area of expertise were available elsewhere at the site. The matter was investigated as an employee concern and the employee was reinstated. Our review of the Investigation Report dated October 1, 2003, indicates that the matter

80

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 1997 7, 1997 Mr. H. J. Hatch [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., H5-20 P.O. Box 1000 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Noncompliance Numbers NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0001 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0002 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0003 Dear Mr. Hatch: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of potential violations of the Quality Assurance Rule (QA Rule) nuclear safety requirements identified in the subject reports. Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated, as Management and Integrating contractor for the DOE's Hanford site, has responsibility for assuring sub-tier contractors comply with its Quality Assurance Plan. On April 27 and 28, 1997, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation personnel met with members of your staff and representatives from Lockheed Martin Hanford Company (LMHC). Our purpose

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter, 1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER (1939) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 On October 11, 1939, Alexander Sachs, Wall Street economist and longtime friend and unofficial advisor to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, met with the President to discuss a letter written by Albert Einstein the previous August (right). Einstein had written to inform Roosevelt that recent research on fission chain reactions utilizing uranium made it probable that large amounts of power could be produced by a chain reaction and that, by harnessing this power, the construction of "extremely powerful bombs" was conceivable. Einstein believed the German government was actively supporting research in this area and urged the United States government to do likewise. Sachs read from a cover letter he had prepared and briefed Roosevelt on the main points contained in Einstein's letter. Initially the President was noncommittal and expressed concern over locating the necessary funds, but at a second meeting over breakfast the next morning Roosevelt became convinced of the value of exploring atomic energy.

82

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 30, 1999 July 30, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc - July 30, 1999 Issued to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. related to Radioactive Material Uptakes at the Y-12 National Security Complex April 15, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 Issued to Stony Brook University Hospital related to a Failed Interlock at the Radiation Therapy Facility at the Brookhaven National Laboratory February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to a Dropped Fuel Basket Assembly and Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-West August 4, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4,

83

Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services Services Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Services ESnet provides interoperable, effective, reliable, and high performance network communications infrastructure, and certain collaboration services, in support of the Office of Science (SC)'s large-scale, collaborative science programs. ESnet provides users with high bandwidth access to DOE sites and DOE's primary science collaborators including Research and

84

Demand for Wildlife Hunting in the Southeastern United States  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

concern of decline in hunting license sales (Anderson et al 1985; Sun et al. 2005) 20% decline in number 15500 16000 16500 1980 1990 2000 2001 2002 2005 Year Licenses('000) Fig: Certified hunting license sales in USA (US Fish & Wildlife Services) #12;2 Benefits from Hunting Revenue License sales Species management

Gray, Matthew

85

1703 Process Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

703 Process Letter 1703 Process Letter A letter to project sponsors with pending applications that could not be considered for the Recovery Act-funded 1705 program due to...

86

Wildlife in Chicago  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

650 October 7, 1961 650 October 7, 1961 Forest Preserve District of Cook County John J. Duffy, President Roberts Mann, Conservation Editor David H. Thompson, Senior Naturalist WILDLIFE IN CHICAGO Few people realize that there is enough native wildlife worth mentioning in roaring, jam-packed Chicago, nor that very much of it is left in its fringe of adjoining suburbs. Surprisingly, this is not the case. Just as rural people become accustomed to urban life, some wild birds and mammals have adjusted to city life and are holding their own. A few kinds seem to be more numerous in parts of metropolitan Chicago than they were in those same areas a hundred years ago. The white-tailed deer, long extinct in this part of Illinois, is on the increase in the Chicago region. In recent winters two of them, perhaps chased by dogs, were rescued from the ice on the lake front -- one at Jackson Park and the other in the Calumet region.

87

Rainwater Wildlife Area Habitat Evaluation Procedures Report; A Columbia Basin Wildlife Mitigation Project.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The 8,768 acre Rainwater Wildlife Area was acquired in September 1998 by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) through an agreement with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to partially offset habitat losses associated with construction of the John Day and McNary hydroelectric facilities on the mainstem Columbia River. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) were used to determine the number of habitat units credited to BPA for acquired lands. Upland and riparian forest, upland and riparian shrub, and grassland cover types are evaluated in this study. Targeted wildlife species include downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), black-capped chickadee (Parus atricopillus), blue grouse (Dendragapus obscurus), great blue heron (Ardea herodias), yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia), mink (Mustela vison), and Western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta). Habitat surveys were conducted in 1998 and 1999 in accordance with published HEP protocols and included 65,300, 594m{sup 2}2 plots, and 112 one-tenth-acre plots. Between 153.3 and 7,187.46 acres were evaluated for each target wildlife mitigation species. Derived habitat suitability indices were multiplied by corresponding cover-type acreages to determine the number of habitat units for each species. The total baseline habitat units credited to BPA for the Rainwater Wildlife Area and its seven target species is 5,185.3 habitat units. Factors limiting habitat suitability are related to the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of past livestock grazing, road construction, and timber harvest which have simplified the structure, composition, and diversity of native plant communities. Alternatives for protecting and improving habitat suitability include exclusion of livestock grazing, road de-commissioning/obliteration, reforestation and thinning, control of competing and unwanted vegetation (including noxious weeds), reestablishing displaced or reduced native vegetation species, allowance of normative processes such as fire occurrence, and facilitating development of natural stable stream channels and associated floodplains. Implementation of habitat enhancement and restoration activities could generate an additional 1,850 habitat units in 10 years. Baseline and estimated future habitat units total 7,035.3 for the Rainwater Wildlife Area. Habitat protection, enhancement and restoration will require long-term commitments from managers to increase probabilities of success and meet the goals and objectives of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Program.

Childs, Allen B.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16, 2002 January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Brookhaven...

89

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IV. Effective Date. This Acquisition Letter is effective 30 days from the date of issue. V. Expiration Date. This Acquisition Letter remains in effect until canceled or...

90

Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Associates - January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16, 2002 January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Brookhaven Science...

91

Services  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Human Capital Office offers benefit, new employee orientation and some learning & development related services to all DOE employees. Additionally the Office supplies employee and labor...

92

Environmental Guidance Program Reference Book: Endangered Species Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. Revision 5  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Endangered Species Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act are major federal statutes designed to protect plant and animal resources from adverse effects due to development projects. Both Acts require consultation with wildlife authorities prior to committing resources to certain types of projects. The purposes and requirements of the two statutes are summarized in the following subsections. Also presented is a list of contacts in the regional and field offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Not Available

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

Wildlife in Chicago  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

386-A September 12, 1970 386-A September 12, 1970 Forest Preserve District of Cook County George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Supt. of Conservation WILDLIFE IN CHICAGO In August of 1803, when a detachment of soldiers came here from Detroit to build Fort Dearborn, they found only four crude cabins, situated on the north bank of the Chicago River. Three were occupied by French fur traders -- LeMaie, Ouilmette and Pettle -- and one was vacant. In 1833, when Chicago was incorporated as a village, there were only 200 people here. Wolves were still a problem, especially in winter. On October 6, 1834, a black bear -- the last wild one seen in Chicago was killed near the intersection of LaSalle and Adams Streets. Game was so plentiful that the region was a hunter's paradise .

94

Wildlife Trade: Scenario  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

real-life situations. The real-life situations. The teacher asks students to spend a few minutes thinking about and jotting down responses in their journals to the question, "When you have gone somewhere on vacation, what kinds of things have you brought back?" She then asks the students to turn to a partner and discuss their responses. Each pair summarizes and shares their comments with the entire group. Several answers were given: pictures, postcards, souvenirs, etc. The project on wildlife trade is expected to be a multiweek inquiry. The goal is to investigate the problem, as defined by the students, using a variety of tools. Students are assigned to base groups or teams, which are frequently reorganized based on interest, but all students return to their base group to share information and help each other fill in the information

95

Wildlife Trade: Scenario  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

real life situations. The real life situations. The teacher asks students to spend a few minutes thinking about and jotting down responses in their journals to the question, "When you have gone somewhere on vacation, what kinds of things have you brought back?" She then asks the students to turn to a partner and discuss their responses. Each pair summarizes and shares their comments with the entire group. Several answers were given: pictures, postcards, souvenirs, etc. The project on wildlife trade is expected to be a multiweek inquiry. The goal is to investigate the problem, as defined by the students, using a variety of tools. Students are assigned to base groups or teams, which are frequently reorganized based on interest, but all students return to their base group to share information and help each other fill in the information

96

Acquisition Letters | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Acquisition Letters Acquisition Letters Acquisition Letters The following is a list of active Department of Energy Acquisition Letters. These files are in PDF (Portable Document Files), MS Excel, or htm (hypertext markup) format. To read PDF files you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader which is available at no charge from Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/). If you have any questions concerning this list, please contact the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy on (202) 287-1330. NOTE: Copies of rescinded or cancelled AL's are available by calling the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 287-1330. ASSISTANCE ON USING THESE FILES: You may: (1) download these files to your local machine by clicking on the file name and choosing SAVE TO DISK, OR (2) you can configure Adobe Acrobat Reader to automatically open, which

97

EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recommendations & Letters Recommendations & Letters EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-03 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-02 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-01 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. July 26, 2012 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2012-01 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. September 19, 2011 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2011-03 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. September 19, 2011 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2011-02

98

RFP Invitation Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Acquisition Services Management (ASM) Division Acquisition Services Management (ASM) Division Subcontracts, ASM-SUB P.O. Box 1663, Mail Stop D447 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 505-665-3814 / Fax 505-665-9022 E-mail: dknox@lanl.gov DATE: July 15, 2013 Subject: Question and Answer Set 3 Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms Project LA-UR-13-25273 Greetings: Interested parties are advised of the following questions or concerns that have been submitted to the Trinity and NERSC-8 Project team and to the accompanying Project responses below: Question/Issue 1 What is the more precise meaning of "On-site System Delivery and Build Complete" for Trinity by Q3CY15 and NERSC 8 by Q4CY15 as referenced on page 6 within the Trinity-NERSC-8-Draft technical

99

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Parks and Wildlife Department Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Name Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Address 4200 Smith School Rd Place...

100

Wanaket Wildlife Area Management Plan : Five-Year Plan for Protecting, Enhancing, and Mitigating Wildlife Habitat Losses for the McNary Hydroelectric Facility.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) propose to continue to protect, enhance, and mitigate wildlife and wildlife habitat at the Wanaket Wildlife Area. The Wanaket Wildlife Area was approved as a Columbia River Basin Wildlife Mitigation Project by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Northwest Power Planning Council (NWPPC) in 1993. This management plan will provide an update of the original management plan approved by BPA in 1995. Wanaket will contribute towards meeting BPA's obligation to compensate for wildlife habitat losses resulting from the construction of the McNary Hydroelectric facility on the Columbia River. By funding the enhancement and operation and maintenance of the Wanaket Wildlife Area, BPA will receive credit towards their mitigation debt. The purpose of the Wanaket Wildlife Area management plan update is to provide programmatic and site-specific standards and guidelines on how the Wanaket Wildlife Area will be managed over the next five years. This plan provides overall guidance on both short and long term activities that will move the area towards the goals, objectives, and desired future conditions for the planning area. The plan will incorporate managed and protected wildlife and wildlife habitat, including operations and maintenance, enhancements, and access and travel management. Specific project objectives are related to protection and enhancement of wildlife habitats and are expressed in terms of habitat units (HU's). Habitat units were developed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service's Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP), and are designed to track habitat gains and/or losses associated with mitigation and/or development projects. Habitat Units for a given species are a product of habitat quantity (expressed in acres) and habitat quality estimates. Habitat quality estimates are developed using Habitat Suitability Indices (HSI). These indices are based on quantifiable habitat features such as vegetation height, shrub cover, or other parameters, which are known to provide life history requisites for mitigation species. Habitat Suitability Indices range from 0 to 1, with an HSI of 1 providing optimum habitat conditions for the selected species. One acre of optimum habitat provides one Habitat Unit. The objective of continued management of the Wanaket Wildlife Mitigation Area, including protection and enhancement of upland and wetland/wetland associated cover types, is to provide and maintain 2,334 HU's of protection credit and generate 2,495 HU's of enhancement credit by the year 2004.

Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Wildlife Program

2001-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Sagebrush Flat Wildlife Area 2008 Annual Report.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Sagebrush Flat Wildlife Area is a 12,718 acre complex located in Douglas County, Washington. Four distinct management units make up the area: Bridgeport, Chester Butte, Dormaier and Sagebrush Flat. The four Units are located across a wide geographic area within Douglas County. The Units are situated roughly along a north/south line from Bridgeport in the north to the Douglas/Grant county line in the south, 60 miles away. The wildlife area was established to conserve and enhance shrubsteppe habitat for the benefit shrubsteppe obligate and dependent wildlife species. In particular, the Sagebrush Flat Wildlife Area is managed to promote the recovery of three state-listed species: Columbian sharp-tailed grouse (threatened), greater sage grouse (threatened) and the pygmy rabbit (endangered). The US Fish and Wildlife Service also list the pygmy rabbit as endangered. Wildlife area staff seeded 250 acres of old agricultural fields located on the Sagebrush Flat, Dormaier and Chester Butte units. This has been a three project to reestablish high quality shrubsteppe habitat on fields that had either been abandoned (Dormaier) or were dominated by non-native grasses. A mix of 17 native grasses and forbs, most of which were locally collected and grown, was used. First year maintenance included spot spraying Dalmatian toadflax on all sites and mowing annual weeds to reduce competition. Photo points were established and will be integral to long term monitoring and evaluation. Additional monitoring and evaluation will come from existing vegetation transects. This year weed control efforts included spot treatment of noxious weeds, particularly Dalmatian toadflax, in previously restored fields on the Bridgeport Unit (150 acres). Spot treatment also took place within fields scheduled for restoration (40 acres) and in areas where toadflax infestations are small and relatively easily contained. Where toadflax is so widespread that chemical treatment would be impractical, we use the bioagent Mecinus janthinus, available through Professor Gary Piper of Washington State University. This year we released 4,000 M. janthinus on the Bridgeport Unit at 6 separate locations. Since 2002 we have released approximately 14,400 of these insects, 80% of these on the Bridgeport Unit. Additional weed control activities included mowing and spot spraying more than 32 miles of roads, cutting and removal of annual weeds within fenced deer exclosures. We upgraded the solar powered irrigation system that supplies water to a stand of water birch trees planted in 2002. Wildlife area staff designed and built a new solar array and installed a higher capacity pump. The increased capacity will ensure that these trees receive adequate water through the hot summer months and allow us to create at least one additional stand. This project is an important part in our effort to expand the available winter habitat for sharp-tailed grouse on the Bridgeport Unit. Maintenance of fences, parking areas and roads continued during throughout the year. Two parking areas, at Chester Butte and Bridgeport, were graded and additional gravel added. Roads on the Bridgeport Unit were graded and repaired following spring runoff. Trespass and dumping issues have increased in recent years on the Bridgeport Unit. To address these problems we constructed four steel gates at access points on this unit. Each gate is tubular steel attached to 8-inch diameter steel posts, 10 feet long that are cemented into the ground. Two gates allow access to BPA substation facilities and power-line right-of ways so placement, construction and locking issues had to be coordinated with BPA's Real Estate staff in Spokane. Environmental Compliance Documentation issues were addressed again this year. This process has the potential to cause delays the completion of projects within the fiscal year. With this in mind and an eye toward the future, we requested that several projects planned for the coming years be surveyed this year. Beginning in August of 2007, area staff worked with BPA staff to identify work elements

Peterson, Dan [Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

2008-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

102

Sagebrush Flat Wildlife Area 2008 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Sagebrush Flat Wildlife Area is a 12,718 acre complex located in Douglas County, Washington. Four distinct management units make up the area: Bridgeport, Chester Butte, Dormaier and Sagebrush Flat. The four Units are located across a wide geographic area within Douglas County. The Units are situated roughly along a north/south line from Bridgeport in the north to the Douglas/Grant county line in the south, 60 miles away. The wildlife area was established to conserve and enhance shrubsteppe habitat for the benefit shrubsteppe obligate and dependent wildlife species. In particular, the Sagebrush Flat Wildlife Area is managed to promote the recovery of three state-listed species: Columbian sharp-tailed grouse (threatened), greater sage grouse (threatened) and the pygmy rabbit (endangered). The US Fish and Wildlife Service also list the pygmy rabbit as endangered. Wildlife area staff seeded 250 acres of old agricultural fields located on the Sagebrush Flat, Dormaier and Chester Butte units. This has been a three project to reestablish high quality shrubsteppe habitat on fields that had either been abandoned (Dormaier) or were dominated by non-native grasses. A mix of 17 native grasses and forbs, most of which were locally collected and grown, was used. First year maintenance included spot spraying Dalmatian toadflax on all sites and mowing annual weeds to reduce competition. Photo points were established and will be integral to long term monitoring and evaluation. Additional monitoring and evaluation will come from existing vegetation transects. This year weed control efforts included spot treatment of noxious weeds, particularly Dalmatian toadflax, in previously restored fields on the Bridgeport Unit (150 acres). Spot treatment also took place within fields scheduled for restoration (40 acres) and in areas where toadflax infestations are small and relatively easily contained. Where toadflax is so widespread that chemical treatment would be impractical, we use the bioagent Mecinus janthinus, available through Professor Gary Piper of Washington State University. This year we released 4,000 M. janthinus on the Bridgeport Unit at 6 separate locations. Since 2002 we have released approximately 14,400 of these insects, 80% of these on the Bridgeport Unit. Additional weed control activities included mowing and spot spraying more than 32 miles of roads, cutting and removal of annual weeds within fenced deer exclosures. We upgraded the solar powered irrigation system that supplies water to a stand of water birch trees planted in 2002. Wildlife area staff designed and built a new solar array and installed a higher capacity pump. The increased capacity will ensure that these trees receive adequate water through the hot summer months and allow us to create at least one additional stand. This project is an important part in our effort to expand the available winter habitat for sharp-tailed grouse on the Bridgeport Unit. Maintenance of fences, parking areas and roads continued during throughout the year. Two parking areas, at Chester Butte and Bridgeport, were graded and additional gravel added. Roads on the Bridgeport Unit were graded and repaired following spring runoff. Trespass and dumping issues have increased in recent years on the Bridgeport Unit. To address these problems we constructed four steel gates at access points on this unit. Each gate is tubular steel attached to 8-inch diameter steel posts, 10 feet long that are cemented into the ground. Two gates allow access to BPA substation facilities and power-line right-of ways so placement, construction and locking issues had to be coordinated with BPA's Real Estate staff in Spokane. Environmental Compliance Documentation issues were addressed again this year. This process has the potential to cause delays the completion of projects within the fiscal year. With this in mind and an eye toward the future, we requested that several projects planned for the coming years be surveyed this year. Beginning in August of 2007, area staff worked with BPA staff to identify work elements

Peterson, Dan [Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

2008-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

103

Wildlife -- Oak Ridge National Environmental Research Park  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

What's New What's New Wildlife Some of the links on this page lead to documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) and can only be viewed with Adobe Acrobat Reader. You can download a free copy from the Adobe site. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT HUNTING ON THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION OTHER WILDLIFE INFORMATION WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Top of Page ORR Wildlife Management Update (Presentation - February 5, 2010) Goose Control. (Video - December 2009) Giffen, Neil R., James W. Evans, and Patricia D. Parr. 2007. Wildlife Management Plan for the Oak Ridge Reservation. ORNL/TM-2006/155. August. Giffen, Neil R. 2007. Nuisance Wildlife Education and Prevention Plan for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL/TM-2006/154. March. Wildlife Management Plan for the ORR (Presentation - November 2006) Wildlife Management Activities on the ORR (Presentation - September 2006)

104

Investigation Letter Report: I11IG002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter Report: I11IG002 Letter Report: I11IG002 Investigation Letter Report: I11IG002 August 17, 2011 Impact of Copper Thefts on the Department of Energy A series of news articles during the last several months have reported increased thefts of copper nationally, including several that have interrupted electrical distribution and telephone service in communities across the country. The Department of Energy's laboratories, environmental remediation sites, generating stations and other facilities have not been immune to this problem. Over the last few years, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has successfully investigated numerous reports of copper thefts from Department sites nationwide. The OIG believes that there are several practical, cost-effective steps that the Department can

105

Microsoft Word - 2008 Letter Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Prepared for Prepared for Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Prepared by 490 L'Enfant Plaza North SW Washington, DC 20024 January 13, 2009 CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT This Page Intentionally Left Blank Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Assessment Letter Report i Executive Summary This Fiscal Year 2008 Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Letter Report presents an evaluation of the adequacy of the one mill per kilowatt-hour fee paid by commercial nuclear power generators for the permanent disposal of their spent nuclear fuel by the Government. This evaluation recommends no fee change.

106

RFP Invitation Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Acquisition Services Management (ASM) Division Subcontracts, ASM-SUB P.O. Box 1663, Mail Stop P215 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 505-665-3814 / Fax 505-665-9022 E-mail: dknox@lanl.gov DATE: December 13, 2012 Subject: Request for Information (RFI) Request for Comments/Input on DRAFT Technical Requirements Document Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms Greetings: Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), a prime contractor to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), anticipates a joint procurement commencing in Government FY 2013 for two large supercomputing platforms to be known as the Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms. The Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms will support the following entities,

107

Fish & Wildlife Annual Project Summary, 1983.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

BPA's Division of Fish and Wildlife was created in 1982 to develop, coordinate and manage BPA's fish and wildlife program. Division activities protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife resources impacted by hydroelectric development and operation in the Columbia River Basin. At present the Division spends 95% of its budget on restoration projects. In 1983, 83 projects addressed all aspects of the anadromous fish life cycle, non-migratory fish problems and the status of wildlife living near reservoirs.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1984-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

2013 General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning Summaries 2013 General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning Summaries GC-1APSReminderLetter-2013.pdf More...

109

UF in Belize Wildlife Ecology & Conservation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UF in Belize Wildlife Ecology & Conservation Spring Break March 1-9, 2014 Understand Ecology and Conservation. Explain Concepts and Terms. Compare and Contrast Wildlife Ecology, Habitat, and Conservation & Life Sciences Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Courses are taught by UF faculty WIS4905

Watson, Craig A.

110

Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Fish and wildlife agencies are facing the challenge of balancing the known and potential impacts to wildlife from lead in spent ammunition and sport fishing tackle with the public perception of the lead issue. Reports about the effect of lead on wildlife, the environment, and/or human health whether real or perceived create social, political and legal pressure to act. Fish and

unknown authors

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Emerging Neurophysiological Specialization for Letter Strings  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In adult readers, printed words and other letter strings activate specialized visual functions within 200 msec, as evident from neurophysiological recordings of brain activity. These fast, specialized responses to letter strings are thought to develop ...

Urs Maurer; Silvia Brem; Kerstin Bucher; Daniel Brandeis

2005-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Tenant data request: Sample letter | ENERGY STAR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

government resources Tenant data request: Sample letter Use this sample letter to request energy data from your tenants. This is helpful for instances where you want whole-building...

113

Resource Letter CP?1: Computational Physics  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Resource Letter provides a guide to the literature on the emerging field of computational physics. While traditional textbooks

Paul L. DeVries

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

AHAM Letter Acknowledging DOE Letter on Verification Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2013 26, 2013 By E-Mail Ms. Kathleen B. Hogan Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Ms. Hogan: I am writing regarding your letter dated April 26, 2013, in which the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) adopted a new policy regarding DOE ENERGY STAR verification

115

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEL-2011-01 NEL-2011-01 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-01 March 31, 2011 Enforcement Letter issued to LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC, regarding work control issues that resulted in the release of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance deficiencies resulting from recent decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities on or near uranium hexafluoride (UF6) and hydrofluoric acid lines at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Kentucky. On September 28, 2010, LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC (LATA Kentucky) reported to DOE noncompliances associated with these deficiencies in Noncompliance

116

Wildlife Management Areas (Maryland) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wildlife Management Areas (Maryland) Wildlife Management Areas (Maryland) Wildlife Management Areas (Maryland) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor Industrial Installer/Contractor Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Maryland Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Management Areas exist in the State of Maryland as wildlife sanctuaries, and vehicles, tree removal, and construction are severely

117

Notices Background The National Wildlife Refuge System  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

89 Federal Register 89 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 223 / Friday, November 20, 2009 / Notices Background The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-

118

DMP ENFORCEMENT LETTER ELDMP102804  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28, 2004 28, 2004 Mr. C. Delbert Marcum [ ] Diversified Metal Products, Inc. 3710 N. Yellowstone Highway P.O. Box 1404 Idaho Fall, Idaho 83403 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies Dear Mr. Marcum: This letter addresses deficiencies associated with the fabrication of four transportainers delivered under contract to Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) in support of their Characterization and Repackaging Modular Unit development. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed your performance in delivering these transportainers and is concerned with the quality assurance aspects of your work activities in fabricating the transportainers. Specifically, three areas of deficiency were noted and are provided below in more detail:

119

FINAL_2013_Stakeholder-Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Send a letter to local officials/stakeholders about your participation in EPA's 2013 ENERGY STAR National Send a letter to local officials/stakeholders about your participation in EPA's 2013 ENERGY STAR National Building Competition by customizing the text below with your organization's information and whether you're also participating in the communications category of the competition. Dear [Name of official], [Name of buildings/space], owned/managed by [organization], has been selected to participate in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 2013 ENERGY STAR National Building Competition: Battle of the Buildings to help improve the energy efficiency of commercial buildings and protect the environment. In the spirit of popular weight-loss competitions, [name of buildings/space] will battle it out against thousands of other teams representing buildings and

120

Letter of Intent: Commercial Real Estate Developer/Owner | ENERGY STAR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Letter of Intent: Commercial Real Estate Developer/Owner Letter of Intent: Commercial Real Estate Developer/Owner Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing buildings Commercial new construction Industrial energy management Small business Service providers Service and product providers Verify applications for ENERGY STAR certification Design commercial buildings Energy efficiency program administrators Commercial and industrial program sponsors Associations State and local governments Federal agencies Tools and resources Training In This Section Campaigns Commercial building design Communications resources Energy management guidance Financial resources Portfolio Manager Products and purchasing Recognition Research and reports Service and product provider (SPP) resources

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 Report Number: IG-FS-99-01 Capital Regional Audit Office Date of Issue: February 25, 1999 Germantown, MD 20874 AUDIT OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL...................................... 1 REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL ON THE DEPARTMENT'S INTERNAL CONTROLS...............................................5

122

LETTERS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Fault mapping and palaeo- seismology at unconventional locations may be required to find out if places such as New Madrid and Charleston are ...

2010-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

123

LETTERS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Seismicity in the areas of past large earthquakes, including those in New Madrid, Missouri (18111812), Charlevoix, Quebec (1663), and Basel, ...

2010-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

124

Willow Creek Wildlife Mitigation- Project Final Environmental Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Willow Creek Wildlife Mitigation- Project Willow Creek Wildlife Mitigation- Project Final Environmental Assessment DOE-EA-1 023 Bonneville POWER ADMINISTRATION April 1995 DISCLAIMER This report w a s prepared a s an account of work sponsored by an agency of t h e United States Government. Neither t h e United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or a s s u m e s any legal liability or responsibility for t h e accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents t h a t its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial, product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise d o e s not necessarily constitute or imply its

125

Wildlife Inventory, Craig Mountain, Idaho.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Wildlife distribution/abundance were studied at this location during 1993 and 1994 to establish the baseline as part of the wildlife mitigation agreement for construction of Dworshak reservoir. Inventory efforts were designed to (1) document distribution/abundance of 4 target species: pileated woodpecker, yellow warbler, black-capped chickadee, and river otter, (2) determine distribution/abundance of rare animals, and (3) determine presence and relative abundance of all other species except deer and elk. 201 wildlife species were observed during the survey period; most were residents or used the area seasonally for breeding or wintering. New distribution or breeding records were established for at least 6 species. Pileated woodpeckers were found at 35% of 134 survey points in upland forests; estimated densities were 0-0.08 birds/ha, averaging 0.02 birds/ha. Yellow warblers were found in riparian areas and shrubby draws below 3500 ft elev., and were most abundant in white alder plant communities (ave. est. densities 0.2-2. 1 birds/ha). Black-capped chickadees were found in riparian and mixed tall shrub vegetation at all elevations (ave. est. densities 0-0.7 birds/ha). River otters and suitable otter denning and foraging habitat were observed along the Snake and Salmon rivers. 15 special status animals (threatened, endangered, sensitive, state species of special concern) were observed at Craig Mt: 3 amphibians, 1 reptile, 8 birds, 3 mammals. Another 5 special status species potentially occur (not documented). Ecosystem-based wildlife management issues are identified. A monitoring plant is presented for assessing effects of mitigation activities.

Cassirer, E. Frances

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Wildlife Risks of Wind and Solar Power  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report examines the potential wildlife impacts resulting from wind and solar power development. The report defines the potential wildlife impacts, the business reasoning for assessing these impacts, details regarding site selection to minimize impacts, strategies to assess impacts, and management strategies to mitigate or minimize impacts. The report will assist utility generation planners and electric power company environmental staff in identifying and evaluating the wildlife impacts of wind and s...

2011-12-13T23:59:59.000Z

127

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter to Roosevelt  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

EINSTEIN'S LETTER TO ROOSEVELT Albert Einstein (with Leo Szilard) to President Franklin Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 Resources > Library Below are photographs of both pages of the letter written by Albert Einstein, with the help of Leo Szilard, to President Franklin Roosevelt on August 2, 1939, warning Roosevelt of the dangers posed by nuclear energy. Click here for more background on the writing of this letter. The photographs of the pages themselves are courtesy the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum. First page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Second page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Click on a link below to return to Einstein's Letter, 1939 Albert Einstein Library Sources and notes for this page.

128

Air Quality Scoping Study for Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada (EMSI April 2007)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S.Department of Energys Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at seven sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Sarcobatus Flat, Beatty, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, and Crater Flat, and at four sites on the NTS. The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. Letter reports provide summaries of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of each sites sampling program.

Johann Engelbrecht, Ilias Kavouras, Dave Campbell, Scott Campbell, Steven Kohl and David Shafer

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Fish and Wildlife | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Notices My stuff Energy blogs Login | Sign Up Search Facebook icon Twitter icon Fish and Wildlife Home Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(150) Contributor 4 September,...

130

Rainwater Wildlife Area Management Plan : Executive Summary.  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the project is to protect, enhance, and mitigate fish and wildlife resources impacted by Columbia River Basin hydroelectric development. The effort is one of several wildlife mitigation projects in the region developed to compensate for terrestrial habitat losses resulting from the construction of McNary and John Day Hydroelectric facilities located on the mainstem Columbia River. While this project is driven primarily by the purpose and need to mitigate for wildlife habitat losses, it is also recognized that management strategies will also benefit many other non-target fish and wildlife species and associated natural resources. The Northwest Power Act directs the NPPC to develop a program to ''protect, mitigate, and enhance'' fish and wildlife of the Columbia River and its tributaries. The overarching goals include: A Columbia River ecosystem that sustains an abundant, productive, and diverse community of fish and wildlife; Mitigation across the basin for the adverse effects to fish and wildlife caused by the development and operation of the hydrosystem; Sufficient populations of fish and wildlife for abundant opportunities for tribal trust and treaty right harvest and for non-tribal harvest; and Recovery of the fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of the hydrosystem that are listed under the Endangered Species Act.

Childs, Allen B.; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation in Oregon.

2002-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Wildlife Management Plan for the ORR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

at maintaining public safety (e.g., reduction in deervehicle collisions, reduction in Canada goosehuman interactions), while also maximizing wildlife health and diversity. *...

132

Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 August, 20, 1999 Issued to International Isotopes Idaho, Inc. related to the Relocation of an Irradiated Pellet at the Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the relocation of an irradiated [isotope] pellet from within a hot cell to an adjoining, outside, charging port service area. This incident occurred on January 6, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is utilized by International

133

Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 August, 20, 1999 Issued to International Isotopes Idaho, Inc. related to the Relocation of an Irradiated Pellet at the Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the relocation of an irradiated [isotope] pellet from within a hot cell to an adjoining, outside, charging port service area. This incident occurred on January 6, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is utilized by International

134

Letter from Elizabeth Chimento and Poul Hertel to the Federal Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Elizabeth Chimento and Poul Hertel to the Federal Elizabeth Chimento and Poul Hertel to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Re: District of Columbia Public Service Commission Emergency Petition and Complaint Docket No. EL05-145-000 Letter from Elizabeth Chimento and Poul Hertel to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Re: District of Columbia Public Service Commission Emergency Petition and Complaint Docket No. EL05-145-000 Docket No. EO-05-01: Letter from Elizabeth Chimento and Poul Hertel to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Re: District of Columbia Public Service Commission Emergency Petition and Complaint Docket No. EL05-145-000 Letter from Elizabeth Chimento and Poul Hertel, Sullivan Environmental Consultants Review of Mirant Unit 1 Plan More Documents & Publications Review of the ENSR Report Titled "Update 1 to: A Dispersion Modeling

135

Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inc. related to Installation and Inspection of Penetration Fire Seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This letter refers to the...

136

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers...

137

Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies, LLC - May...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 21, 2007 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to Nuclear Safety Quality Assurance Requirements Deficiencies at the Nevada Test Site The...

138

Pre-Proposal Development WHITE PAPERS, PRE-PROPOSALS, LETTERS OF INTENT, OR LETTERS OF  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Pre-Proposal Development - 1 - WHITE PAPERS, PRE-PROPOSALS, LETTERS OF INTENT, OR LETTERS OF INQUIRY White papers, often used by defense agencies, and letters of intent and pre- proposals, typically unnecessary work for you and the sponsor. White Papers & Pre-Proposals Proposal preparation and review

Raina, Ramesh

139

EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), 6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration to fund the portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to wildlife habitat mitigation projects to be undertaken in a cooperative effort with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Finding of No Significant Impact Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic) July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Final Environmental Assessment Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic)

140

EA-0956: South Fork Snake River/Palisades Wildlife Mitigation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management Plan to compensate for losses of wildlife and wildlife habitat due to hydroelectric development at Palisades Dam. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix G: Consultation Letters  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS APPENDIX G: CONSULTATION LETTERS Consultation Letters G-2 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-3 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LETTERS TO STATE AGENCIES AND RECOGNIZED NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS Consultation Letters G-4 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-5 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-6 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-7 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-8 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-9 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-10 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-11 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-12 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS

142

Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

03 03 The Honorable J. Gresham Barrett U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Barrett: Thank you for your August 8, 2003, letter regarding my guidance memorandum providing direction for restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). I share your concern that "inhibiting the ability of the community to engage in dialogue with the Department of Energy on issues affecting the cleanup efforts" would be undesirable, and I want to assure you that my SSAB guidance memorandum does not affect that important relationship. In no way does it change my policy or support regarding the value and importance of the EM SSABs.

143

Enforcement Letter - BWXT Y-12  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13, 2004 13, 2004 Mr. Dennis R. Ruddy [ ] BWXT Y-12 P.O. Box 2009 MS 8001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8001 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Ruddy: On June 7, 2004, the Department of Energy (DOE)/Na tional Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (EA-2004-04), which included a quality improvement citation for continuing Safety Basis compliance issues at Y-12. BWXT Y-12 performance in this area had been the subject of discussion during both the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) onsite investigation, held during October 2003, and the subsequent enforcement conference held on January 22, 2004. On August 5, 2004, BWXT Y-12 submitted Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report number NTS-Y12- -BWXT-Y12NUCLEAR-2004-0007, titled Corrective Actions

144

Enforcement Letter - Argonne-East  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 1997 3, 1997 Dr. William H. Hannum Argonne National Laboratory-East 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Il 60439 Re: Noncompliance Report NTS-CH-AA-ANLE-ANLE-1996-0001 Dear Dr. Hannum: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the failure to complete the required radiological worker training or retraining for approximately 30 percent of ANL-E's 797 radiological workers, was identified by ANL-E on December 17, 1996, and reported to DOE on December 20, 1996. On November 22, 1996, ANL-E initiated a review of the personnel training records of a

145

Enforcement Letter - ELBWXT082902WS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

858 858 August 29, 2002 Dr. D. B. Shipp [ ] Bechtel BWXT Idaho, L.L.C. 2525 Freemont Avenue Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Subject: RWMC Enforcement Letter (NTS-ID--BBWI-RWMC-2002-0002) Dear Dr. Shipp: During July 16-17, 2002, personnel from the DOE Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) conducted an onsite investigation at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) of multiple events occurring during 2001-2002. The events all involved transuranic (TRU) waste characterization, handling, and shipping activities. The investigation included a detailed review of the March 2002 event in which an incorrect payload of TRU waste drums was shipped to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). OE also reviewed an additional seven similar events occurring in

146

Roberson Letter - June 2, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2003 , 2003 Mr. Monte Wilson Chair Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Citizens Advisory Board 1055 Dear Mr. Wilson: This in response to your March 29, 2003, letter regarding the recommendations on transuranic (TRLD waste management suggested by the Office of Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Let me extend my appreciation for the time and effort put forth by the SSABs in developing a comprehensive set of recommendations to accelerate cleanup of TRU waste sites across the complex. We agree in principle with the recommendations. The recommendations support concepts presented in the National Transuranic Waste Management Plan, the Performance Management Plan for Transuranic Waste, and recent and ongoing TRU waste studies by the National Research Council. We are

147

2012 WILDLIFE CAPTURE, IMMOBILIZATION, AND HANDLING COURSE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Blow pipes Darts Dart guns 5. The Drugging Event: putting it all together (i.e. drugs and equipment. Drugging, reversal (i.v. and i.m.), and antibiotics: syringes, pole syringes, blow-pipes, darts, dart.M. Arnemo. 2007. Handbook of Wildlife Immobilization: International Edition. Wildlife Pharmaceutical, Inc

Weiblen, George D

148

SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT F-62 Rocky Mountain Mule Deer  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. USDA . Monthly Contract Report. 1986-2005. Farm Services Agency. U.S. Dept. Agriculture. Washington D 1978; Goggans 1986; Howie and Ritchie 1987; Reynolds and Linkhart 1992; Powers et al. 1996). In centralSOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT F-62 Rocky Mountain Mule Deer

149

Shillapoo Wildlife Area, Annual Report 2006-2007.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes accomplishments, challenges and successes on WDFW's Shillapoo Wildlife Area funded under Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) Wildlife Mitigation Program (BPA project No.2003-012-00) during the Fiscal Year 07 contract period October 1, 2006-September 30, 2007. The information presented here is intended to supplement that contained in BPA's PISCES contract development and reporting system. The organization below is by broad categories of work but references are made to individual work elements in the PISCES Statement of Work as appropriate. The greatest success realized during this contract period was significant positive changes in the vegetative community in several wetland basins throughout the wildlife area. This major goal is being achieved in part by new equipment and operation capability funded under the BPA contract, state capital and migratory bird stamp funds, and the past or ongoing investment of other partners including Ducks Unlimited, The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Clark Public Utilities and others. We continue to be challenged by requirements under the archaeological and historic preservation act necessary to protect many sensitive sites known to occur within the wildlife area. The problems encountered to date have been largely administrative in nature and those experienced this year were unforeseen and probably unavoidable. Early in the contract period, WDFW and BPA had agreed to have a BPA staff archaeologist perform the survey and reporting work. Unexpectedly, just prior to the expected start date for the surveys, the employee resigned leaving BPA's staff short handed and necessitated contracting the work with an archaeological consultant. This delay caused us to forego work on several projects that are now deferred until the next contract period. The most notable projects impacted by this unfortunate circumstance are those involving the construction or repair of fences.

Calkins, Brian

2006-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

Columbia River Wildlife Mitigation Habitat Evaluation Procedures Report / Scotch Creek Wildlife Area, Berg Brothers, and Douglas County Pygmy Rabbit Projects.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Habitat Evaluation Procedure study was conducted to determine baseline habitat units (HUs) on the Scotch Creek, Mineral Hill, Pogue Mountain, Chesaw and Tunk Valley Habitat Areas (collectively known as the Scotch Creek Wildlife Area) in Okanogan County, Sagebrush Flat and the Dormaler property in Douglas County, and the Berg Brothers ranch located in Okanogan County within the Colville Reservation. A HEP team comprised of individuals from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (Appendix A) conducted baseline habitat surveys using the following HEP evaluation species: mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus), pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginiana), mink (Mustela vison), Canada goose (Branta canadensis), downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), Lewis woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis), and Yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia). Results of the HEP analysis are listed below. General ratings (poor, marginal, fair, etc.,) are described in Appendix B. Mule deer habitat was marginal lacking diversity and quantify of suitable browse species. Sharp-tailed grouse habitat was marginal lacking residual nesting cover and suitable winter habitat Pygmy rabbit habitat was in fair condition except for the Dormaier property which was rated marginal due to excessive shrub canopy closure at some sites. This report is an analysis of baseline habitat conditions on mitigation project lands and provides estimated habitat units for mitigation crediting purposes. In addition, information from this document could be used by wildlife habitat managers to develop management strategies for specific project sites.

Ashley, Paul R.

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report; Kaniksu Unit Pend Oreille National Wildlife Refuge  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Little Pend Oreille National Wildlife Refuge is proposing to acquire a 706-acre property located in Stevens County, Washington. The new acquisition would be called the Kaniksu Unit. A habitat evaluation was conducted on the property using the Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) methodology (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1980). Evaluation species were black-capped chickadee, mallard, ruffed grouse and white-tailed deer. Life requisites evaluated were food and reproduction for black-capped chickadee, food, cover, and reproduction for mallard, available winter browse for white-tailed deer and fall-to-spring cover for ruffed grouse.

US Fish and Wildlife Service Staff

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

exposed to energized electrical energy sufficient to cause serious injury or electrocution. Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter,...

153

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc More Documents & Publications ACQUISITION LETTER DEAR Part 933 OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Chapter 33 - Protests, Disputes and Appeals...

154

Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Annual Report--2004  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Biodiversity Conservation areas Reserve selection Stochastic programming

McGuire, A. David

155

Wildlife Management Areas (Florida) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Florida) Florida) Wildlife Management Areas (Florida) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Florida Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Certain sites in Florida are designated as wildlife management areas, and

156

Unraveling life four letters at a time  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Unraveling life four letters at a time Unraveling life four letters at a time 1663 Los Alamos science and technology magazine Latest Issue:November 2013 All Issues » submit Unraveling life four letters at a time Major advances in sequencing since the official end of the Human Genome Project are fueling a revolution in genomics research. November 25, 2013 Unraveling life four letters at a time Reading the genetic code of life keeps getting faster and cheaper, bringing more and more new discoveries within reach. The genomics revolution that came after the Human Genome Project The Human Genome Project officially ended in 2003, but the 10 years since have seen dramatic improvements in genomics technology and discovery. New, rapid sequencing machines provide high throughput conversion of genetic material (DNA or RNA) into data to be arranged into its proper order by a

157

Letter to Grossenbacher | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter to Grossenbacher Letter to Grossenbacher Letter to Grossenbacher This letter refers to the Department of Energy (DOE) investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with the fume hood fire that occurred in building TRA-668 at the Reactor Technology Complex on June 12, 2007, and the electrical shock of two firefighters responding to a wildland fire at the Idaho National Laboratoryon July 14, 2007. The results of our investigation were discussed with you and members of your staff on November 8, 2007, the final day of the onsite portion of our investigation, and provided to you in an lnvestigation Report dated December 5, 2007. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - WEA-2008-01, Preliminary - March 20, 2008 More Documents & Publications

158

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

159

Three Letters to an Architect Dissolving  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Three Letters to an Architect Dissolving Douglas Dardendeceive yourself. To be an architect is to lay d o w n y o uheavy earth. Give up, architect: n o m a n , and less the

Darden, Douglas

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

LANL Enforcement Letter - 7/7/2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2003 Vice Admiral George P. Nanos Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Los Alamos National Laboratory Enforcement Letter Dear Admiral...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

NNSA Policy Letter: NAP-4B  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Policy Letter: NAP-4B Date: June 30,2008 TITLE: Corporate Performance Evaluation Process for M&O Contractors I. OBJECTIVE: To establish and implement a uniform, corporate process...

162

Acquisition Letters Archives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Letters Archives Acquisition Letters Archives Acquisition Letters Archives 95-06, 06/28/95, Personal Property Letter System 95-14, 11/17/95, PDF, Subcontracts Under the New Independent States Program 96-09, 9/16/96, PDF, Full and Open Competition - Management & Operating Contracts 98-11, 9/18/98, PDF, Waiver of Synopsis Requirements 99-04, 6/23/99, PDF, Consortium Buying 99-06, 8/27/99, PDF, DOE Authorized Subcontract for Use by DOE M&O Contractors with New Independent States Scientific Institutes Through the International Science & Technology Center Attachment to AL 99-06 Model Subcontract 2000-05, 5/17/2000, PDF, DOE Authorized Subcontract for Use by DOE M&O Management and Operating (M&O) Contractors with New Independent States' Scientific Institutes through Science and Technology in Ukraine

163

Nevada Department of Wildlife | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wildlife Wildlife Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Nevada Department of Wildlife Name Nevada Department of Wildlife Address 1100 Valley Rd. Place Reno, Nevada Zip 89512 Website http://www.ndow.org/ Coordinates 39.5394967°, -119.807584° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.5394967,"lon":-119.807584,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

164

World Wildlife Fund | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wildlife Fund Wildlife Fund Jump to: navigation, search Logo: World Wildlife Fund Name World Wildlife Fund Address 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street, N.W. Place Washington, DC Zip 20090-7180 Region Northeast - NY NJ CT PA Area Website http://www.worldwildlife.org Coordinates 38.92°, -76.99° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.92,"lon":-76.99,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

165

Colorado Division of Wildlife | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wildlife Wildlife Jump to: navigation, search Name Colorado Parks and Wildlife Address 1313 Sherman Street, Suite 618 Place Denver, Colorado Zip 80203 Phone number (303) 866-3437 Website http://wildlife.state.co.us/Pa Coordinates 39.7370973°, -104.9851154° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.7370973,"lon":-104.9851154,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

166

Generic Letter 96-06 Waterhammer Issues Resolution: Technical Basis Report - Proprietary  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Generic Letter (GL) 96-06 identified potential issues for waterhammer effects during postulated events that can cause potential damage to service water systems. The User's Manual (Volume 1) provides methods recommended for evaluating the impact of potential waterhammer loads on plant service water system components. This Technical Basis Report (Volume 2) provides detailed background information and the technical basis for the methods defined in the User's Manual.

2002-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

167

Generic Letter 96-06 Waterhammer Issues Resolution: Technical Basis Report - Non Proprietary  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Generic Letter (GL) 96-06 identified potential issues for waterhammer effects during postulated events that can cause potential damage to service water systems. The User's Manual (Volume 1) provides methods recommended for evaluating the impact of potential waterhammer loads on plant service water system components. This Technical Basis Report (Volume 2) provides detailed background information and the technical basis for the methods defined in the User's Manual.

2002-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

168

Wildlife Impact Assessment and Summary of Previous Mitigation Related to Hydroelectric Projects in Montana, Volume One, Libby Dam Project, Operator, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This assessment addresses the impacts to the wildlife populations and wildlife habitats due to the Libby Dam project on the Kootenai River and previous mitigation of these losses. The current assessment documents the best available information concerning the impacts to the wildlife populations inhabiting the project area prior to construction of the dam and creation of the reservoir. Many of the impacts reported in this assessment differ from those contained in the earlier document compiled by the Fish and Wildlife Service; however, this document is a thorough compilation of the available data (habitat and wildlife) and, though conservative, attempts to realistically assess the impacts related to the Libby Dam project. Where appropriate the impacts resulting from highway construction and railroad relocation were included in the assessment. This was consistent with the previous assessments.

Yde, Chris A.

1984-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

69www.wildlife.org The Wildlife Society lake Grisham crawled from under the Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

69www.wildlife.org© The Wildlife Society B lake Grisham crawled from under the Texas Tech field to get water to the dilapidated structure. Towns are few and far between on the Texas Southern High Resources Management at Texas Tech University. Credit: Clint Boal After rising early at the texas tech field

170

Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Plan for the Thompson Falls Hydroelectric Project, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document presents a preliminary mitigation and enhancement plan for the Thompson Falls hydroelectric project. It discusses options available to provide wildlife protection, mitigation and enhancement in accordance with the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-501). The options focus on mitigation for wildlife and wildlife habitat losses attributable to the construction of the hydroelectric project. These losses were previously estimated from the best available information concerning the degree of negative and positive impacts to target wildlife species (Wood and Olsen 1984). Criteria by which the mitigation alternatives were evaluated were the same as those used to assess the impacts identified in the Phase I document (Wood and Olsen 1984). They were also evaluated according to feasibility and cost effectiveness. This document specifically focuses on mitigation for target species which were identified during Phase I (Wood and Olsen 1984). It was assumed mitigation and enhancement for the many other target wildlife species impacted by the hydroelectric developments will occur as secondary benefits. The recommended mitigation plan includes two recommended mitigation projects: (1) development of wildlife protection and enhancement plans for MPC lands and (2) strategies to protect several large islands upstream of the Thompson Falls reservoir. If implemented, these projects would provide satisfactory mitigation for wildlife losses associated with the Thompson Falls hydroelectric project. The intent of the mitigation plan is to recommend wildlife management objectives and guidelines. The specific techniques, plans, methods and agreements would be developed is part of the implementation phase.

Bissell, Gael; Wood, Marilyn

1985-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1560 or at jason.taylor@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash_Nondisplacement.pdf SIGNED_classdeviation970.5244-1.pdf AL nondisplacement of qualified workers.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2013-79 Professional and Consultant service cost (FAR 31.205-33) Policy Flash 2013-41 Contracts Periods of Performance Exceeding 5 Years Policy Flashes FY 2013

172

Potential Oil Production from Coastal Plain of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Updated Assessment  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

EIA received a letter (dated March 10, 2000) from Senator Frank H. Murkowski as Chairmanof the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requesting an EIA Service Reportwith plausible scenarios for ANWR supply development consistent with the most recentU.S. Geological Survey resource assessments. This service report is prepared in response to therequest of Senator Murkowski. It focuses on the ANWR coastal plain, a region currentlyrestricted from exploration and development, and updates EIA's 1987 ANWR assessment.

Floyd Wiesepape

2000-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Wildlife Management Plan for the Oak Ridge Reservation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document outlines a plan for management of the wildlife resources on the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Oak Ridge Reservation. Management includes wildlife population control through hunting, trapping, removal, and habitat manipulation; wildlife damage control; restoration of wildlife species; preservation, management, and enhancement of wildlife habitats; coordination of wildlife studies and characterization of areas; and law enforcement. Wildlife resources are divided into several categories, each with a specific set of objectives and procedures for attaining them. These objectives are management of (1) wildlife habitats to ensure that all resident wildlife species exist on the Reservation in viable numbers; (2) featured species to produce selected species in desired numbers on designated land units; (3) game species for research, education, recreation, and public safety; (4) the Three Bend Scenic and Wildlife Management Refuge Area; (5) nuisance wildlife, including nonnative species, to achieve adequate population control for the maintenance of health and safety on the Reservation; (6) sensitive species (i.e., state or federally listed as endangered, threatened, of special concern, or in need of management) through preservation and protection of both the species and habitats critical to the survival of those species; and (7) wildlife disease. Achievement of the objectives is a joint effort between the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory through agreements between TWRA and DOE and between DOE and UT-Battelle, LLC.

Giffen, Neil R [ORNL; Evans, James W. [TWRA; Parr, Patricia Dreyer [ORNL

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Pesticides and their effects on wildlife  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

About 560 active ingredients are currently used as pesticides. Applications of these pesticides are made to agricultural lands and other areas inhabited by wildlife. Unfortunately, many agricultural-use pesticides also entail some measure of risk to organisms other than the pest species. Because testing of pesticides prior to registration cannot evaluate all the potential environmental-pesticide-wildlife/fish interactions, current methods of risk assessment do not always provide sufficient safety to nontarget organisms. This is evidenced by die-offs of fish and wildlife from applications of pesticides at environmentally {open_quotes}safe{close_quotes} rates, the linking of population declines of some species with agrochemical use, and observations of survival-threatening behavioral changes in laboratory and field animals exposed to typical field levels of pesticides. It is important to note, however, that the majority of pesticides, when properly applied, have not caused significant injury to wildlife. A brief summary of pesticide effects on wildlife and fish are presented for the common classes of pesticides in use today.

Driver, C.J.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Photo of the Week: Rocky Flats Wildlife Refuge | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rocky Flats Wildlife Refuge Photo of the Week: Rocky Flats Wildlife Refuge December 21, 2012 - 11:27am Addthis The Rocky Flats Plant was first established in 1951 as a nuclear...

176

Northwest Montana Wildlife Mitigation Habitat Protection : Advance Design : Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the habitat protection process developed to mitigate for certain wildlife and wildlife habitat losses due to construction of Hungry Horse and Libby dams in northwestern Montana.

Wood, Marilyn A.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

Wildlife and Wind Energy | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Wildlife and Wind Energy Jump to: navigation, search Sage grouse sitting in grassland. Photo from LuRay Parker, NREL 17429 Birds and bats are occasionally killed in collisions with wind turbines. Like any form of development, wind projects can also negatively impact wildlife by altering habitat. However, although the wind industry receives a lot of attention for avian impacts, research shows that nuclear and fossil-fueled plants have a greater impact. The Avian and Wildlife Costs of Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Power report quantifies those impacts. The study estimates that wind farms are responsible for roughly 0.27 avian fatalities

178

Letter: The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on Transuranic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on Transuranic Waste Management Letter: The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on Transuranic Waste Management From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Citizens Advisory Board 1055 This letter is in response to a March 29, 2003, letter regarding the recommendations on transuranic (TRLD waste management suggested by the Office of Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Roberson Letter - June 2, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

179

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

180

Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: Wade Waters, Chair, Savannah River Citizens' Advisory Board This letter is in response to a July 29, 2003 letter regarding implementation of the guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - August 15, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Regarding Delegation of Designated Federal Officials for Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

182

Hellsgate Winter Range : Wildlife Mitigation Project. Preliminary Environmental Assessment.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Bonneville Power Administration proposes funding the Hellsgate Winter Range Wildlife Mitigation Project in cooperation with the Colville Convederated Tribes and Bureau of Indian Affairs. This Preliminary Environmental Assessment examines the potential environmental effects of acquiring and managing property for wildlife and wildlife habitat within a large project area. The Propose action is intended to meet the need for mitigation of wildlife and wild life habitat that was adversely affected by the construction of Grand Coulee and Chief Joseph Dams and their reservoirs.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Letter Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Regarding the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's ("DC PSC") Emergency Petition Letter Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Regarding the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's ("DC PSC") Emergency Petition Docket No. EO-05-01: During the course of participating in the above-captioned Department of Energy ("DOE") docket, Robert G. Burnley, Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality ("Director"), has filed two pleadings regarding the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's ("DC PSC") Emergency Petition. After initial uncertainty

184

Wildlife Management Areas (Minnesota) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Minnesota) Minnesota) Wildlife Management Areas (Minnesota) < Back Eligibility Utility Fed. Government Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Residential Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Low-Income Residential Schools Retail Supplier Institutional Multi-Family Residential Systems Integrator Fuel Distributor Nonprofit General Public/Consumer Transportation Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Minnesota Program Type Siting and Permitting Certain areas of the State are designated as wildlife protection areas and refuges; new construction and development is restricted in these areas

185

Wildlife Refuges (Iowa) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Refuges (Iowa) Refuges (Iowa) Wildlife Refuges (Iowa) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Iowa Program Type Environmental Regulations Provider Iowa Department of Natural Resources This document contains a list of wildlife refuges and sanctuaries in the state

186

Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation Implementation 2000 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report covers calendar year 2000 activities for the Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation Implementation project. This project, implemented by Idaho Department of Fish and Game and Shoshone Bannock Tribes wildlife mitigation staff, is designed to protect, enhance and maintain wildlife habitats to mitigate construction losses for Palisades, Anderson Ranch, Black Canyon and Minidoka hydroelectric projects. Additional project information is available in the quarterly reports.

Bottum, Edward; Mikkelsen, Anders

2001-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

Southern idaho Wildlife Mitigation Implementation 1999 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report is for the Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation Implementation project. This project, implemented by IDFG and SBT wildlife mitigation staff, is designed to protect, enhance and maintain wildlife habitats to mitigate construction losses for Palisades, Anderson Ranch, Black Canyon and Minidoka hydroelectric projects. Additional project information is available in the quarterly reports.

Bottum, Edward; Mikkelsen, Anders

2000-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

United states Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

improvement in storage charac- teri tic i obtained thereby. nle s keep- ing quality of dehydrated fi h can Fe search. vol. 9, DO. 4, pp. 319-327, July- st. Coen, Camillo. 1931. Preserving fish. French Patent and Industrial Re- search, British Ministry of Food, unpublished report, pp. 1-16, June. Scott, Geo. G

189

THE NORTHERN FUR SEAL FISH A>jm WILDLIFE SERVICE-  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

are conserved for the future, and that renewable resources make their full contribution to the progress, pros taken to the Canton market to trade for tea, silks, and other products of China. The huge populations

190

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Unit Coalc1ale Rearing Unit ) Crystal River Ree.ring Unit Denver He.tchery Dolores Rearing Unit Durango~1 River Hatchery Moccasin Cl"eek Hatchery Moja:ve River Hatchery MoorehQ~se Springs Hatchery M~ington Hatchery Voluntown Rearing Station Windsor Locks Hatchery FLORIDA Blackwater River Hatchery Wewahitchka

191

Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE March 16. 2009 DATE March 16. 2009 REPLY TO ATTN OF. IG-40 SUBJECT Letter Report on "Y- 12 National Security Complex Accountable Classified Removable Electronic Media Program," INS-L-09-03 (S091S008) TO Manager, Y-12 Site Ortice This is to advise you of the results of an Office of Inspector General inspection 01 accountable classified removable electronic media (ACREM) at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12). BACKGROUND Y-12 is responsible Cor ensuring the safety and reliability of the Nation's nuclear weapon stockpile and handles and stores some of the Nation's most sensitive information. Y-12 is managed and operated by Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Y- 12, LLC, and the Y-12 Site Ocfice oversees this contract.

192

Bylaws of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida Page 1 DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Bylaws of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida Page 1 BYLAWS OF DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA (Ratified February 2010) Preamble The shared goals of the faculty and administration of the Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation are to attain excellence

Watson, Craig A.

193

Annual Report on Wildlife Activities, 1985 Fiscal Year, Action Item 40.1, Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The report presents a brief synopsis and discussion of wildlife activities undertaken by Bonneville Power Administration. The objectives of the program were wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement planning; and implementation of actions to protect, mitigate, and enhance wildlife affected by development and operation of hydroelectric facilities in the Columbia River Basin. (ACR)

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1985-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Rainwater Wildlife Area Management Plan Executive Summary : A Columbia Basin Wildlife Mitigation Project.  

SciTech Connect

This Executive Summary provides an overview of the Draft Rainwater Wildlife Area Management Plan. The comprehensive plan can be viewed on the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) website at: www.umatilla.nsn.us or requested in hard copy from the CTUIR at the address below. The wildlife area was established in September 1998 when the CTUIR purchased the Rainwater Ranch through Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for purposes of fish and wildlife mitigation for the McNary and John Day dams. The Management Plan has been developed under a standardized planning process developed by BPA for Columbia River Basin Wildlife Mitigation Projects (See Guiding Policies Section below). The plan outlines the framework for managing the project area, provides an assessment of existing conditions and key resource issues, and presents an array of habitat management and enhancement strategies. The plan culminates into a 5-Year Action Plan that will focus management actions and prioritize funding during the 2002-2006 planning period. Since acquisition of the property in late 1998, the CTUIR has conducted an extensive baseline resource assessment in preparation for the management plan, initiated habitat restoration in the Griffin Fork drainage to address road-related resource damage caused by roads constructed for forest practices and an extensive flood event in 1996, and initiated infrastructure developments associated with the Access and Travel Management Plan (i.e., installed parking areas, gates, and public information signs). In addition to these efforts, the CTUIR has worked to set up a long-term funding mechanism with BPA through the NPPC Fish and Wildlife Program. The CTUIR has also continued to coordinate closely with local and state government organizations to ensure consistency with local land use laws and maintain open lines of communication regarding important issues such as big game hunting, tribal member exercise of treaty rights, and public access. During the past two years, non-Indian public concern over big game hunting issues has at times overwhelmed other issues related to the wildlife area. In 2001, the CTUIR Fish and Wildlife Committee closed the wildlife area to tribal branch antlered bull elk harvest in response to harvest data that indicated harvest rates were greater than expected. In addition, illegal harvest of mature bull elk in southeastern Washington during the 2001 season exceeded the legal tribal and nontribal harvest combined which has created a potential significant regression in the bull;cow ratio in the Blue Mountain Elk herd. CTUIR Fish and Wildlife Committee and staff and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Regional Director and staff have been coordinating regularly to develop strategies to address harvest rates and ensure protection of viable big game herds in southeastern Washington. The CTUIR Fish and Wildlife Committee and WDFW has jointly agreed to continue close coordination on this and other issues and continue working together to ensure the long-term vigor of the elk herd on the Rainwater Wildlife Area. The purpose of the project is to protect, enhance, and mitigate fish and wildlife resources impacted by Columbia River Basin hydroelectric development. The effort is one of several wildlife mitigation projects in the region developed to compensate for terrestrial habitat losses resulting from the construction of McNary and John Day Hydroelectric facilities located on the mainstem Columbia River. While this project is driven primarily by the purpose and need to mitigate for wildlife habitat losses, it is also recognized that management strategies will also benefit many other non-target fish and wildlife species and associated natural resources.

Childs, Allen B.

2002-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

196

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

197

U.S. Department of Energy Idaho National Engineering and Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

appendix will include consultationapproval letters between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding threatened and endangered species,...

198

Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Plan for Libby Hydroelectric Project, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report describes the proposed mitigation plan for wildlife losses attributable to the construction of the Libby hydroelectric project. Mitigation objectives and alternatives, the recommended mitigation projects, and the crediting system for each project are described by each target species. The report describes mitigation that has already taken place and 8 recommended mitigation projects designed to complete total wildlife mitigation. 8 refs., 2 figs., 12 tabs.

Mundinger, John

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Wildlife Mitigation Program Record of Decision.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to adopt a set of Descriptions (goals, strategies, and procedural requirements) that apply to future BPA-funded wildlife mitigation projects. Various. sources-including Indian tribes, state agencies, property owners, private conservation groups, or other Federal agencies-propose wildlife mitigation projects to the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council) for BPA funding. Following independent scientific and public reviews, Council then selects projects to recommend for BPA funding. BPA adopts this set of prescriptions to standardize the planning and implementation of individual wildlife mitigation projects. This decision is based on consideration of potential environmental impacts evaluated in BPA`s Wildlife Mitigation Program Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0246) published March, 20, 1997, and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the week of March 24, 1997 (EPA Notice of Availability Published April 4, 1997, 62 FR 65, 16154). BPA will distribute this Record of Decision to all known interested and affected persons, groups, tribes, and agencies.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Oil Development & the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Refuge (ANWR) is a wildlife refuge in Alaska Created 1956 during Eisenhower administration 1980 doubled. 9 #12;The coastal plain as depicted by oil lobbyists Source: ANWR.org 10 #12;The coastal plain can be a dreary place 11 #12;Even a harsh place 12 #12;But it also is very beautiful 13 #12;President Bush on ANWR

Kalinowski, Steven T

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Letter Report on Selected Aspects of the Department of Energy's Activities Involving the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

202

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- June 2, 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005

203

Enforcement Letter issued to BWXT Y-12- October 13, 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to BWXT Y-12 related to Safety Basis Compliance Deficiencies at the Y-12 National Security Complex

204

Wildlife Mitigation Program Record of Decision; 06April1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wildlife Mitigation Program Record of Decision Wildlife Mitigation Program Record of Decision SUMMARY Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to adopt a set of prescriptions (goals, strategies, and procedural requirements) that apply to future BPA-funded wildlife mitigation projects. Various sourcesincluding Indian tribes, state agencies, property owners, private conservation groups, or other Federal agenciespropose wildlife mitigation projects to the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council) for BPA funding. Following independent scientific and public reviews, Council then selects projects to recommend for BPA funding. BPA adopts this set of prescriptions to standardize the planning and implementation of individual wildlife mitigation projects. This decision is based on consideration of potential environmental

205

Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Questions...

206

Enforcement Letter -Idaho-08/04/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 1998 4, 1998 Mr. John Denson [ ] Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company P.O.Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report NTS-ID--LITCOSITEW-1998-0001 Dear Mr. Denson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy=s (DOE) evaluation of the Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report for noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120, "Quality Assurance Requirements." The NTS report addresses a repetitive problem of maintaining the operability of radiation monitoring instrumentation and systems referenced in nuclear facilities authorization basis documents. The repetitive problem was identified by LMITCO on February 27, 1998, and reported to DOE on

207

Enforcement Letter - Oakland-11/02/1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 1999 5, 1999 Dr. Robert W. Kuckuck [ ] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, L-005 Livermore, CA 94551-0808 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-OAK--LLNL-LLNL-1999-0004, NTS-OAK--LLNL- LLNL-1999-0006, NTS-OAK--LLNL-LLNL-1999-0007) Dear Dr. Kuckuck: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: 1. On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

208

Enforcement Letter -Chicago-02/24/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2000 4, 2000 Yoon I. Chang, PhD [ ] Argonne National Laboratory-East 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439-4832 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-CH-AA-ANLE-ANLE-1999-0009) Dear Dr. Chang: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the above referenced Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report describing bioassay program deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory- East (ANL-E). This report was submitted to DOE on December 23, 1999. Approximately thirteen months previous to this NTS report's submittal, DOE's Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-Enforcement) issued to all DOE and contractor Price-Anderson Amendments Act coordinators a memorandum explaining EH-Enforcement's experience with and concern regarding contractor bioassay program

209

NNSA Policy Letter: NAP-4B  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Policy Letter: NAP-4B Policy Letter: NAP-4B Date: June 30,2008 TITLE: Corporate Performance Evaluation Process for M&O Contractors I. OBJECTIVE: To establish and implement a uniform, corporate process for evaluation of National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Management and Operating (M&O) contractors' performance that promotes effective and efficient accomplishment of the NNSA mission while balancing safety and production effectively. This process results in documented, consistent and fair evaluation of M&O contractor performance. 11. APPLICABILITY: This process applies to all NNSA organizations and elements excluding NA-30. The Contractor Performance Evaluation Process will be an "NNSA-corporate," integrated process applied consistently by all NNSA sites. The corporate process may be updated

210

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

211

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters January 25, 2010 DOE issued letters to 25 manufacturers of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) involving various models after PEARL Cycle 9 testing indicated that the models do not meet the ENERGY STAR specification and, therefore, are disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program. When a product is disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program, all corresponding packaging and supplier's products will be disqualified as well. CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Communication Memo Realizing Building End-Use Efficiency with Ermerging Technologies Identifying Cost-Effective Residential Energy Efficiency Opportunities for the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative

212

Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: The Honorable J. Gresham Barrett U.S. House of Representatives This letter is in response to an August 8, 2003 letter regarding Assistant Secretary Roberson's guidance memorandum providing direction for restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

213

Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: The Honorable J. Gresham Barrett U.S. House of Representatives This letter is in response to an August 8, 2003 letter regarding Assistant Secretary Roberson's guidance memorandum providing direction for restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

214

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters January 25, 2010 DOE issued letters to 25 manufacturers of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) involving various models after PEARL Cycle 9 testing indicated that the models do not meet the ENERGY STAR specification and, therefore, are disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program. When a product is disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program, all corresponding packaging and supplier's products will be disqualified as well. CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Communication Memo Identifying Cost-Effective Residential Energy Efficiency Opportunities for the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative Realizing Building End-Use Efficiency with Ermerging Technologies

215

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

216

CO2 Health Effects in Wildlife Species  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The impetus for this project is the possible development of large-scale carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, transport, and storage (CCS) sites that have the potential to release CO2 into the environment and cause adverse health effects. The purpose of this project is to obtain information from the scientific literature on the effects of CO2 exposure in wildlife animal species. This report, along with previously documented information on the effects of CO2 in humans, laboratory animals, and domesticated animals...

2008-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

217

Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) Report for the Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife II Project, Technical Report 2002.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP), developed in 1980 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS 1980a, USFWS 1980b), uses a habitat/species based approach to assessing project impacts, and is a convenient tool to document the predicted effects of proposed management actions. The Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC) endorsed the use of HEP in its Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program to evaluate wildlife benefits and impacts associated with the development and operation of the federal Columbia River Basin hydroelectric system (NPPC 1994). The Albeni Falls Interagency Work Group (AFIWG) used HEP in 1987 to evaluate wildlife habitat losses attributed to the Albeni Falls hydroelectric facility (Martin et al. 1988). In 1992, the AFIWG (Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Kalispel, Coeur d'Alene, and Kootenai Tribes) began implementing activities to mitigate these losses. Implementation activities include protecting, restoring and enhancing wildlife habitat. HEPs are used extensively within the NPPC's Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Wildlife managers use HEP to determine habitat lost from the construction of the federal hydroelectric projects and habitat gained through NPPC mitigation program. Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) models for each of the seven target species are used to determine habitat quality and quantity losses for representative habitat cover types for this project. Target species include Bald Eagle, black-capped chickadee, Canada goose, mallard, muskrat, white-tailed deer and yellow warbler. In 2002, a HEP team determined the habitat condition of the 164-acre Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife II Project (Figure 1). The HEP team consisted of the following members and agencies: Roy Finley, Kalispel Natural Resource Department (KNRD); Neil Lockwood, KNRD; Brian Merson, KNRD; Sonny Finley, KNRD; Darren Holmes, KNRD; Anna, Washington Dept. of Fish and Game (WDFW); and Scott, WDFW. Baseline Habitat Units (HU) will be credited to Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for protection of habitats within the project area. The HSI models used were identical to those modified for use in 1991 (Appendix 2). The objective of using HEP as an assessment tool is two-fold. First, it provides an unbiased and measured assessment of wildlife habitats within the mitigation parcel. This data is used to offset the Albeni Falls Dam HU loss ledger. That ledger accounts for the loss of wildlife habitat that resulted from the construction and inundation of Albeni Falls hydroelectric project and the extent to which those losses have been mitigated. Additionally, the baseline HEP evaluation describes existing habitat conditions on the property and will be used, along with other tools, to determine initial management, restoration, and enhancement activities. HEP analyses will be completed every five years to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies in improving and maintaining habitat conditions while providing additional HU crediting to BPA for enhanced habitat values.

Holmes, Darren

2003-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) Report for the Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife Project, Technical Report 2002.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP), developed in 1980 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS 1980a, USFWS 1980b), uses a habitat/species based approach to assessing project impacts, and is a convenient tool to document the predicted effects of proposed management actions. The Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC) endorsed the use of HEP in its Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program to evaluate wildlife benefits and impacts associated with the development and operation of the federal Columbia River Basin hydroelectric system (NPPC 1994). The Albeni Falls Interagency Work Group (AFIWG) used HEP in 1987 to evaluate wildlife habitat losses attributed to the Albeni Falls hydroelectric facility (Martin et al. 1988). In 1992, the AFIWG (Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Kalispel, Coeur d'Alene, and Kootenai Tribes) began implementing activities to mitigate these losses. Implementation activities include protecting, restoring and enhancing wildlife habitat. HEPs are used extensively within the NPPC's Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Wildlife managers use HEP to determine habitat lost from the construction of the federal hydroelectric projects and habitat gained through NPPC mitigation program. Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) models for each of the seven target species are used to determine habitat quality and quantity losses for representative habitat cover types for this project. Target species include Bald Eagle, black-capped chickadee, Canada goose, mallard, muskrat, white-tailed deer and yellow warbler. In 2002, a HEP team determined the habitat condition of the 436-acre Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife Project (Figure 1). The HEP team consisted of the following members and agencies: Roy Finley, Kalispel Natural Resource Department (KNRD); Neil Lockwood, KNRD; Brian Merson, KNRD; Sonny Finley, KNRD; Darren Holmes, KNRD; Anna, Washington Dept. of Fish and Game (WDFW); and Scott, WDFW. Baseline Habitat Units (HU) will be credited to Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for protection of habitats within the project area. The HSI models used were identical to those modified for use in 1991 (Attachment A). The objective of using HEP as an assessment tool is two-fold. First, it provides an unbiased and measured assessment of wildlife habitats within the mitigation parcel. This data is used to offset the Albeni Falls Dam HU loss ledger. That ledger accounts for the loss of wildlife habitat that resulted from the construction and inundation of Albeni Falls hydroelectric project and the extent to which those losses have been mitigated. Additionally, the baseline HEP evaluation describes existing habitat conditions on the property and will be used, along with other tools, to determine initial management, restoration, and enhancement activities. HEP analyses will be completed every five years to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies in improving and maintaining habitat conditions while providing additional HU crediting to BPA for enhanced habitat values.

Holmes, Darren

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

Bonneville Power Administration Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan Final EIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: 2: Appendices DOE/EIS-0312 April 2003 Appendix A Fish and Wildlife Funding Principles for Bonneville Power Administration Rates and Contracts Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan EIS Appendix A: Fish and Wildlife Funding Principles Appendix A/ 1 Appendix A FISH AND WILDLIFE FUNDING PRINCIPLES FOR BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION RATES AND CONTRACTS September 16, 1998 Preamble The purpose of these principles is to conclude the fish and wildlife funding process in which Bonneville has been engaged with various interests in the Region, and provide a set of guidelines for structuring Bonneville's subscription and power rate processes. The principles are intended to "keep the options open" for future fish and wildlife decisions that are anticipated to be made in late 1999 on reconfiguration of the hydrosystem and in

220

Northeast Oregon Wildlife Mitigation Project : Final Environmental Assessment.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Development of the hydropower system in the Columbia River Basin has had far-reaching effects on many species of wildlife. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is responsible for mitigating the loss of wildlife habitat caused by the Federal portion of this system, as allocated to the purpose of power production. BPA needs to mitigate for loss of wildlife habitat in the Snake River Subbasin.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Nez Perce Tribe

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Rainwater Wildlife Area, Watershed Management Plan, A Columbia Basin Wildlife Mitigation Project, 2002.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Management Plan has been developed by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) to document how the Rainwater Wildlife Area (formerly known as the Rainwater Ranch) will be managed. The plan has been developed under a standardized planning process developed by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for Columbia River Basin Wildlife Mitigation Projects (See Appendix A and Guiding Policies Section below). The plan outlines the framework for managing the project area, provides an assessment of existing conditions and key resource issues, and presents an array of habitat management and enhancement strategies. The plan culminates into a 5-Year Action Plan that will focus our management actions and prioritize funding during the Fiscal 2001-2005 planning period. This plan is a product of nearly two years of field studies and research, public scoping, and coordination with the Rainwater Advisory Committee. The committee consists of representatives from tribal government, state agencies, local government, public organizations, and members of the public. The plan is organized into several sections with Chapter 1 providing introductory information such as project location, purpose and need, project goals and objectives, common elements and assumptions, coordination efforts and public scoping, and historical information about the project area. Key issues are presented in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 discusses existing resource conditions within the wildlife area. Chapter 4 provides a detailed presentation on management activities and Chapter 5 outlines a monitoring and evaluation plan for the project that will help assess whether the project is meeting the intended purpose and need and the goals and objectives. Chapter 6 displays the action plan and provides a prioritized list of actions with associated budget for the next five year period. Successive chapters contain appendices, references, definitions, and a glossary. The purpose of the project is to protect, enhance, and mitigate fish and wildlife resources impacted by Columbia River Basin hydroelectric development. The effort is one of several wildlife mitigation projects in the region developed to compensate for terrestrial habitat losses resulting from the construction of McNary and John Day Hydroelectric facilities located on the mainstem Columbia River. While this project is driven primarily by the purpose and need to mitigate for wildlife habitat losses, it is also recognized that management strategies will also benefit many other non-target fish and wildlife species and associated natural resources. The Rainwater project is much more than a wildlife project--it is a watershed project with potential to benefit resources at the watershed scale. Goals and objectives presented in the following sections include both mitigation and non-mitigation related goals and objectives.

Childs, Allen B.

2002-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

222

Enforcement Letter - Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 1997 7, 1997 Dr. Sigfried S. Hecker [ ] Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Noncompliance Report NTS-ALO-LA-LANL-LANL-1996-0004 Dear Dr. Hecker: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The noncompliances involved the failure of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to adequately implement the requirements contained in the governing quality assurance standard for stockpile evaluations in the areas of work controls and procedural compliance. As a result of these failures, an explosion and fire occurred at the [ ] on November 14, 1996.

223

Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report; Steigerwald Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Technical Report 2000-2001.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Steigenvald Lake National Wildlife Refuge (NWR, refuge) was established as a result of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) transferring ownership of the Stevenson tract located in the historic Steigerwald Lake site to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS, Service) for the mitigation of the fish and wildlife losses associated with the construction of a second powerhouse at the Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River and relocation of the town of North Bonneville (Public Law 98-396). The construction project was completed in 1983 and resulted in the loss of approximately 577 acres of habitat on the Washington shore of the Columbia River (USFWS, 1982). The COE determined that acquisition and development of the Steigenvald Lake area, along with other on-site project management actions, would meet their legal obligation to mitigate for these impacts (USCOE, 1985). Mitigation requirements included restoration and enhancement of this property to increase overall habitat diversity and productivity. From 1994 to 1999, 317 acres of additional lands, consisting of four tracts of contiguous land, were added to the original refuge with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) funds provided through the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement. These tracts comprised Straub (191 acres), James (90 acres), Burlington Northern (27 acres), and Bliss (9 acres). Refer to Figure 1. Under this Agreement, BPA budgeted $2,730,000 to the Service for 'the protection, mitigation, and enhancement of wildlife and wildlife habitat that was adversely affected by the construction of Federal hydroelectric dams on the Columbia River or its tributaries' in the state of Washington (BPA, 1993). Lands acquired for mitigation resulting from BPA actions are evaluated using the habitat evaluation procedures (HEP) methodology, which quantifies how many Habitat Units (HUs) are to be credited to BPA. HUs or credits gained lessen BPA's debt, which was formally tabulated in the Federal Columbia River Power System Loss Assessments and adopted as part of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Fish and Wildlife Program as a BPA obligation (BPA, 1994). Steigenvald Lake NWR is located in southwest Washington (Clark County), within the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. Historically part of the Columbia River flood plain, the refuge area was disconnected from the river by a series of dikes constructed by the COE for flood control in 1966. An aerial photograph from 1948 portrays this area as an exceedingly complex mosaic of open water, wetlands, sloughs, willow and cottonwood stands, wet meadows, upland pastures, and agricultural fields, which once supported a large assemblage of fish and wildlife populations. Eliminating the threat of periodic inundation by the Columbia River allowed landowners to more completely convert the area into upland pasture and farmland through channelization and removal of standing water. Native pastures were 'improved' for grazing by the introduction of non-native fescues, orchard grass, ryegrass, and numerous clovers. Although efforts to drain the lake were not entirely successful, wetland values were still significantly reduced.

Allard, Donna

2001-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

224

Oregon Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Policy | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon Oregon Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Policy Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Reference Material:...

225

Pantex wildlife program featured on Amarillo's NewsChannel 10...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

and study the wildlife living on the Pantex site. Pantex is currently studying how wind energy can impact the surrounding ecosystems and has studied rattlesnakes and horned...

226

National Wildlife Chemical Effects Database | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Wildlife Chemical Effects Database Agriculture Community Menu DATA APPS EVENTS DEVELOPER STATISTICS COLLABORATE ABOUT Agriculture You are here Data.gov Communities ...

227

EA-0928: Burlington Bottoms Wildlife Mitigation Project, Multnomah County, Oregon  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy's Bonneville Power Administration proposal to fund wildlife management and enhancement activities for the Burlington...

228

Integrated training course for engineers and wildlife biologists  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

technical expertise and training on wildlife and highwaycomprehensive (yet concise) training course on the basics ofinterdisciplinary two-day training session that walks

Jacobson, Sandra L.; Brennan, Terry

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

Wind-Wildlife Impacts Literature Database (WILD) (Poster)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The NREL Wind-Wildlife Impacts Literature Database (WILD) contains citations to more than 1,000 journal articles, government publications, conference proceedings, and other reports.

Sinclair, K.; Sandberg, T.; Cohn, S.

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C - September 11, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

C - September 11, 2000 C - September 11, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C - September 11, 2000 September 11, 2000 Issued to Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC related to Noncompliances with Design and Procurement Requirements at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of noncompliance report number NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-2000-0005, which describes noncompliances with the design and procurement requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(iii) requires that procured items and services shall meet established requirements and perform as required; 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(ii) requires that design work including changes, shall incorporate applicable requirements and design

231

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 August 4, 1998 Issued to Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company related to a Repetitive Problem with Instrument Operability at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report for noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120, "Quality Assurance Requirements." The NTS report addresses a repetitive problem of maintaining the operability of radiation monitoring instrumentation and systems referenced in nuclear facilities authorization

232

Enforcement Letter, Controlled Power Company - WEL-2012-02 |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Company - WEL-2012-02 October 23, 2012 Enforcement Letter issued to Controlled Power Company related to an Electrical Shock Near Miss that occurred in the Radiological...

233

Letter from the Nuclear Energy Institute to DOE GC | Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from the Nuclear Energy Institute to DOE GC Letter from the Nuclear Energy Institute to DOE GC Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost...

234

February 25, 2003, Department letter forwarding its Annual Report...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in January 2003). Recommendations Closed * The Assistant Secretary, Environmental Management, sent a letter to the Board on March 14, 2002, proposing closure of recommendation...

235

Letter of Intent: Architect of Record (AOR) | ENERGY STAR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Letter of Intent: Architect of Record (AOR) Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing buildings Commercial new...

236

Letter Report, Environment, Safety & Health Issues at the Ashtabula...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Letter Report, Environment, Safety & Health Issues at the Ashtabula Environmental Management Project,...

237

Enforcement Letter, Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc - May 4, 2000...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2000 Issued to Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc., related to Deficiencies in the Unresolved Safety Question Process at the Miamisburg Environmental Management Project This letter...

238

Resource Letter PSNAC-1: Physics and society: Nuclear arms control  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Resource Letter provides a guide to the literature on nuclear arms control for the nonspecialist. Journal articles and books are cited for the following topics: nuclear weapons

Alexander Glaser; Zia Mian

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

Letter from California Portland Cement CEO to the Cement Industry...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Letter from California Portland Cement CEO to the Cement Industry Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing...

240

Enforcement Letter, BWXT Y-12- June 15, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to BWXT Y-12 related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies in construction activities at the Y-12 National Security Complex Highly Enriched Uranium Manufacturing Facility

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads Letter Response from the Plumbing...

242

Letter from Plumbing Manufacturers Institute to Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

re: Ex Parte Communication Letter from Plumbing Manufacturers Institute to Department of Energy re: Ex Parte Communication The Department issued an interpretive rule setting forth...

243

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior...

244

Validating alternative methods of modeling wildlife corridors using relocation data from migrating elk and dispersing wolverines.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?? Habitat loss and fragmentation increasingly impede wildlife movements that are essential for the long-term persistence of populations. Wildlife corridors facilitating movement have become a (more)

Rainey, Meredith McClure

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Validating alternative methods of modeling wildlife corridors using relocation data from migrating elk and dispersing wolverines.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??Habitat loss and fragmentation increasingly impede wildlife movements that are essential for the long-term persistence of populations. Wildlife corridors facilitating movement have become a key (more)

Rainey, Meredith McClure.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

South Fork Snake River/Palisades Wildlife Mitigation Project: Environmental assessment  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

BPA proposes to fund the implementation of the South Fork Snake River Programmatic Management Plan to compensate for losses of wildlife and wildlife habitat due to hydroelectric development at Palisades Dam. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game drafted the plan, which was completed in May 1993. This plan recommends land and conservation easement acquisition and wildlife habitat enhancement measures. These measures would be implemented on selected lands along the South Fork of the Snake River between Palisades Dam and the confluence with the Henry`s Fork, and on portions of the Henry`s Fork located in Bonneville, Madison, and Jefferson Counties, Idaho. BPA has prepared an Environmental Assessment evaluating the proposed project. The EA also incorporates by reference the analyses in the South Fork Snake River Activity/Operations Plan and EA prepared jointly in 1991 by the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required and BPA is issuing this FONSI.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

Letter Report Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Tonopah Airport, Nye County, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Tonopah Airport, Beatty, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat NWR, Crater Flat, and the Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Engelbrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2009-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

248

Letter Report: Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Caliente, Lincoln County, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Beatty, Sarcobatus Flats, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat NWR, Crater Flat, and Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Englebrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

Letter Report Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Crater Flat, Nye County, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) (cover page figure) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Beatty, Sarcobatus Flats, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat NWR, Crater Flat, and Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Engelbrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S.Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2009-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

250

Letter Report: Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Tonopah Airport, Nye County, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Tonopah Airport, Beatty, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat NWR, Crater Flat, and the Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Engelbrecht; I. Kavouras; D Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl, D. Shafer

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

Letter Report: Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Crater Flat, Nye County, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) (cover page figure) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Beatty, Sarcobatus Flats, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat NWR, Crater Flat, and Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Engelbrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

Annual Report on Wildlife Activities, September 1985 - April 1986, Action item 40.1, Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This annual report addresses the status of wildlife projects Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has implemented from September 1985 to April 1986 under the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Program) established pursuant to the Northwest Power Act (P.L. 96-501). Wildlife projects implemented prior to September 1985 are discussed in BPA's September 1985 Annual Report on Wildlife Activities. This report provides a brief synopsis, review, and discussion of wildlife activities BPA has undertaken. When available, annual and final reports are listed for each project. The wildlife section of the Program establishes a process intended to achieve two objectives: wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement planning; and implementation of actions to protect, mitigate, and enhance wildlife affected by development and operation of hydroelectric facilities in the Columbia River Basin. The wildlife mitigation planning process developed by the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council) is a stepwise process that proceeds through the review of the status of wildlife mitigation at Columbia River Basin hydroelectric facilities [Measure 1004 (b)(l)]; estimates wildlife losses from hydroelectric development and operation [Measure 1004 (b)(2)]; and recommends actions for the protection, mitigation, or enhancement of wildlife [Measure 1004 (b)(3), Mitigation Plans]. Implementation of wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement will occur upon amendment of wildlife actions into the Program by the Council. The majority of BPA's effort to date has gone towards coordinating and implementing wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement planning projects.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1986-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks 490 North Meridian Road  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Fish and Wildlife Office, Boise, Idaho, Pacific Region, Portland, Oregon. USWS.. 1999. Status review Department of the Interior IDAHO FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Room 368 Boise, Idaho 83709 Inspector General Report disclosing irregularities in development of its 2005 bull trout final critical

254

Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation Implementation 2000 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report covers calendar year 2001 activities for the Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation Implementation project. This project, implemented by Idaho Department of Fish and Game and Shoshone Bannock Tribes, is designed to protect, enhance and maintain wildlife habitats to mitigate for construction losses associated with Anderson Ranch, Black Canyon, Deadwood, Minidoka and Palisades hydroelectric projects. Additional project information is available in the quarterly reports.

Bottum, Edward; Mikkelsen, Anders

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

Wind Energy Development and its Impacts on Wildlife  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Wind Energy Development and its Impacts on Wildlife Carrie Lowe, M.S. Candidate UniversityOutline · Introduction · Wind energy in the U.S. I t ildlif· Impacts on wildlife · Guidelines · Future directions · References IntroductionIntroduction What is wind energy? · The process by which turbines convert the kinetic

Gray, Matthew

256

Utah Division of Wildlife Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Resources Resources Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Name Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Address 1594 W North Temple, Suite 2110, Box 146301 Place Salt Lake City, Utah Zip 84114-6301 Phone number 801-538-4745 Website http://wildlife.utah.gov/dwr/a References Webpage[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is an organization based in Salt Lake City, Utah. References ↑ "Webpage" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Utah_Division_of_Wildlife_Resources&oldid=536488" Categories: Government Agencies Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load)

257

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2002 31, 2002 Dr. William J. Madia [ ] Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6255 Subject: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Madia: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS- ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2002-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation report, associated corrective action plan, and discussion with site personnel. The subject NTS report described a series of deficiencies that resulted in several personnel being exposed to unanticipated radiation fields during the startup testing of an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) source at the [facility]. The exposures occurred

258

Enforcement Letter - Brookhaven-12/18/1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nicholas Samios Nicholas Samios [ ] Brookhaven National Laboratory Post Office Box 5000 Building 460 Upton, New York 11973-5000 Subject: Noncompliance Number NTS-CH-BH-BNL-PE-1996-0001 Dear Dr. Samios: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Brookhaven National Laboratory's (BNL) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection Rule). These potential noncompliances involved a number of instances of contractor or subcontractor failure to: (1) comply with area radiological warning signs, (2) use protective clothing and equipment, (3) maintain radiation exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), or (4) complete radiological worker training. On May 22, 1996, BNL reported

259

Oct 2009 final concurrence letter for BPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Justice Justice Office of Dispute Resolution - - Washington, D.C. 20530 October 22,2009 The Honorable Steven Chu Secretary for the U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 - . -- - . Dear Secretary Chu, This is in reference to the letter dated January 15,2009, fiom your predecessor, Honorable Samuel W. Bodman, which accompanied a policy document outlining guidance for the use of binding arbitration in specified cases by the Bonneville Power Administration. The Attorney General has reviewed the document "Bonneville Power Administration's Guidance on the Use of Binding Arbitration for BPA Contracts" and concurs with the proposed policy for use of binding arbitration which is contained therein. Mr. Holder's concurrence is dated October 9,2009.

260

LANL Enforcement Letter - 7/7/2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2003 7, 2003 Vice Admiral George P. Nanos [ ] Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Los Alamos National Laboratory Enforcement Letter Dear Admiral Nanos: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) is concerned that nuclear safety at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL/Laboratory) continues to demonstrate a negative performance trend. Our observations are based on numerous recent events involving both nuclear safety and radiological control issues. Since our last discussions at the March 2003 LANL Price-Anderson Amendments Act Enforcement Conference, my office has reviewed numerous nuclear safety and radiological events as part of enforcement action follow-up and monitoring. The events

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

McSlarrow Letter - March 9, 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04-000642 04-000642 The Deputy Secretary of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 9, 2004 Mr. Todd Martin Chair, Hanford Advisory Board Dear Mr. Martin: Thank you for your January 15, 2004, letter to Under Secretary Card regarding the transition of closure sites from the Office of Environmental Management (EM) to other Department of Energy (DOE) organizations, specifically the Office of Legacy Management (LM). Public participation has been and continues to be an integral part of the DOE's cleanup efforts and the Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs) have contributed to improving public understanding of site operations. However, with the shift in mission from active cleanup to long-term surveillance and maintenance for closure sites, DOE will need to evaluate the appropriate level of public participation and the most

262

Enforcement Letter - Argonne National Laboratory East  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 1996 6, 1996 Dr. William H. Hannum Argonne National Laboratory-East 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 Re: Noncompliance Report NTS-CH-AA-ANLE-ANLEER-1996-0001 Dear Dr. Hannum: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the unexpected, uncontrolled radiation exposure of an ANL-E temporary employee during January- August 1995 was identified by ANL-E on December 11, 1995, and reported to DOE on March 1, 1996, in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). The exposure to the ANL-E temporary employee resulted from radiation streaming from a storage vault which was used to store a high level

263

Analysis of Crude Oil Production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3 3 Analysis of Crude Oil Production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge May 2008 Energy Information Administration Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should be attributed to the Energy Information Administration and should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or any other organization. Service Reports are prepared by the Energy Information Administration upon special request and are based on assumptions specified by the requester. Contacts

264

GENERAL LETTER 2008-3 DATE: October 20, 2008  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

GENERAL LETTER 2008-3 DATE: October 20, 2008 TO: Administrative Heads of State Agencies and Records-site Public Records Storage Facilities This General Letter applies to state agencies that store public records Facilities (revised 07/1999). OFF-SITE PUBLIC RECORDS STORAGE FACILITIES State agencies may store public

Oliver, Douglas L.

265

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho - March 31, 2006 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho - March 31, 2006 Idaho - March 31, 2006 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho - March 31, 2006 March 31, 2006 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC, related to External Radiation Dosimetry Accreditation Issues at the Idaho National Laboratory This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding a quality assurance-related deficiency stemming from the recent external radiation dosimetry performance testing by the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) of dosimeters utilized at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This deficiency was identified through the quality assurance testing of external dosimeters by CH2MWG Idaho (CWI) staff. Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1095-2011 Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill - October 4, 2004

266

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Isolation Division - October Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 October 3, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of four noncompliances with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule (10 CFR 830.120) and/or the Occupational Radiation Protection Rule (10 CFR 835) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997

267

Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee for Receiving the EPA's 2006 Citizen's Excellence in Community Involvement Award Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee for Receiving the EPA's 2006 Citizen's Excellence in Community Involvement Award From: Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, James A. Rispoli To: Mr. Kerry Trammell, Chair Site Specific Advisory Board This letter congratulaties Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board and its Stewardship Committee on being awarded the Environmental Protection Agency's 2006 Citizen's Excellence in Community Involvement Award. Rispoli Letter - June 21, 2006 More Documents & Publications EM SSAB Conference Calls - October 20, 2005 EM SSAB Conference Calls - June 8, 2005

268

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Isolation Division - October Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 October 3, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of four noncompliances with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule (10 CFR 830.120) and/or the Occupational Radiation Protection Rule (10 CFR 835) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997

269

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security LLC, - May Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory In our recent dialogue via televideo with your Deputy, safeguards and security director, and other key managers of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC; the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC- May 15, 2008

270

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security LLC - May 15, 2008 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLC - May 15, 2008 LLC - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security LLC - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Los Alamos National Laboratory In our recent dialogue with you and members of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS); the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. We appreciate the laboratory's perspectives and your ongoing efforts to address these concerns. Enforcement Letter , Bechtel BWXT Idaho LLC - March 17, 2008

271

Enforcement Letter, Sandia Corporation - May 15, 2008 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Corporation - May 15, 2008 Corporation - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Sandia Corporation - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Sandia Corporation related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Sandia National Laboratories In our recent dialogue with Dr. Al Romig, Mr. Michael Hazen and members of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Sandia Corporation; the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. We appreciate the laboratories' perspectives and your ongoing efforts to address these concerns. Enforcement Letter, Sandia Corporation - May 15, 2008

272

Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Plan for the Noxon Rapids and Cabinet Gorge Hydroelectric Projects, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Mitigation projects for wildlife species impacted by the Noxon Rapids and Cabinet Gorge hydroelectric projects are recommended. First priority projects encompass the development of long-term wildlife management plans for WWP lands adjacent to the two reservoirs. General objectives for all WWP lands include alternatives designed to protect or enhance existing wildlife habitat. It is also suggested that WWP evaluate the current status of beaver and river otter populations occupying the reservoirs and implement indicated management. Second priority projects include the protection/enhancement of wildlife habitat on state owned or privately owned lands. Long-term wildlife management agreements would be developed with Montana School Trust lands and may involve reimbursement of revenues lost to the state. Third priority projects include the enhancement of big game winter ranges located on Kootenai National Forest lands. 1 ref., 1 fig., 7 tabs.

Bissell, Gael

1985-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

Atlas of coal/minerals and important resource problem areas for fish and wildlife in the conterminous United States  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The atlas highlights areas in the conterminous US of potential concern involving coal and minerals development activities and fish and wildlife resources, in particular the Important Resource Problem Areas (IRPs) designated in 1980 by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as areas of emphasis in policymaking. The atlas serves as an initial screening tool for national and regional planners and administrators to help define areas that may require additional analysis prior to development in order to minimize disturbances and adverse impacts on fish and wildlife resources and to protect and enhance these resources where practicable. The publication contains maps of selected mineral resources (coal, copper, geothermal resources, gold, iron, molybdenum, nickel, oil shale/tar sands, peat, phosphate, silver, uranium), IRPs, and Federal Endangered and Threatened Animal Species. An overlay of the IRP map is provided: by placing this on a mineral map, counties containing both mineral and wildlife resources will be highlighted. Background information on IRPs, the mineral commodities, and environmental impacts of mineral mining is provided, as well as appendices which tabulate the data displayed in the maps. The document can also be used with a series of 1:7,500,000-scale reproductions of the maps.

Honig, R.A.; Olson, R.J.; Mason, W.T. Jr.

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

NSLS Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services NSLS Services Computing Services Lab Space Libraries Postal Services Procurement Repair & Equipment Services Shipping Procedures Storage User Accounts Workshop Procedures...

275

Letter Report Final SA _01-17-01_.PDF | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter Report Final SA 01-17-01.PDF&0; Letter Report Final SA 01-17-01.PDF&0; Letter Report Final SA 01-17-01.PDF&0; More Documents & Publications O:HOMEPAGEFOIA...

276

Secretary Chu Letter to 2nd US-China EE Forum | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Letter to 2nd US-China EE Forum Secretary Chu Letter to 2nd US-China EE Forum English and Chinese translation of Secretary Chu's letter to participants in the 2nd...

277

Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report : Rainwater Wildlife Area, 1998-2001 Technical Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The 8,768 acre Rainwater Wildlife Area was acquired in September 1998 by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) through an agreement with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to partially offset habitat losses associated with construction of the John Day and McNary hydroelectric facilities on the mainstem Columbia River. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) were used to determine the number of habitat units credited to BPA for acquired lands. Upland and riparian forest, upland and riparian shrub, and grassland rover types are evaluated in this study. Targeted wildlife species include downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), black-capped chickadee (Parus atricopillus), blue grouse (Dendragapus obscurus), great blue heron (Ardea herodias), yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia), mink (Mustela vison), and Western meadowlark (Sturnella neglects). Habitat surveys were conducted in 1998 and 1999 in accordance with published HEP protocols and included 65,300, 594m{sup 2} plots, and 112 one-tenth-acre plots. Between 153.3 and 7,187.46 acres were evaluated for each target wildlife mitigation species. Derived habitat suitability indices were multiplied by corresponding cover-type acreages to determine the number of habitat units for each species. The total baseline habitat units credited to BPA for the Rainwater Wildlife Area and its seven target species is 5,185.3 habitat units. Factors limiting habitat suitability are related to the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of past livestock grazing, road construction, and timber harvest which have simplified the structure, composition, and diversity of native plant communities. Alternatives for protecting and improving habitat suitability include exclusion of livestock grazing, road de-commissioning/obliteration, reforestation and thinning, control of competing and unwanted vegetation (including noxious weeds), reestablishing displaced or reduced native vegetation species, allowance of normative processes such as fire occurrence, and facilitating development of natural stable stream channels and associated floodplains. Implementation of habitat enhancement and restoration activities could generate an additional 1,850 habitat units in 10 years. Baseline and estimated future habitat units total 7,035.3 for the Rainwater Wildlife Area. Habitat protection, enhancement and restoration will require long-term commitments from managers to increase probabilities of success and meet the goals and objectives of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Program. Longer-term benefits of protection and enhancement activities include increases in native species diversity and plant community resiliency in all cover types. Watershed conditions, including floodplain/riparian, and instream habitat quality should improve as well providing multiple benefits for terrestrial and aquatic resources. While such benefits are not necessarily recognized by HEP models and reflected in the number of habitat units generated, they are consistent with the NPPC Fish and Wildlife Program.

Childs, Allen

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Plan for Hungry Horse Hydroelectric Project, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report describes the proposed mitigation plan for wildlife losses attributable to the construction of the Hungry Horse hydroelectric project. In this report, mitigation objectives and alternatives, the recommended mitigation projects, and the crediting system for each project are described by each target species. Mitigation objectives for each species (group) were established based on the loss estimates but tailored to the recommended projects. 13 refs., 3 figs., 19 tabs.

Bissell, Gael

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Services | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services Services Services Office of Inspector General Hotline: The Office of Inspector General (OIG) maintains a Hotline to facilitate the reporting of allegations of fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs or operations. If you wish to report such allegations, you may call, send a letter, or email the OIG Hotline as identified at the right. Allegations may be reported by DOE employees, DOE contractors, or the general public. Issues that should be reported: Abuse of funds Contract, Procurement, and Grant Fraud Environment, Health, and Safety Violations Computer Crimes Product Substitution and Suspect/Counterfeit Parts Bribery, Kickbacks, and Gratuities False Statements and False Claims Conflicts of Interest and Ethics Violations

280

Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report; Yakama Nation Wildlife Management Areas, Technical Report 1999-2000.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Construction of the Dalles, Bonneville, McNary, and John Day Dams on the Columbia River by the federal government resulted in a substantial loss of riparian bottomland along the Columbia River. Impacts associated with the Mid-Columbia Projects were assessed for several wildlife species using the Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI-FWS 1980). The studies documented the loss of riparian habitat and established a baseline against which mitigation measures could be developed (USDI-FWS 1990 and USDE-BPA 1990). The impact assessments established a mitigation goal, a portion of which would be satisfied by the creation, restoration, and enhancement of riparian lands on tributaries to the Columbia River, including the Yakima Valley. The Yakama Nation (YN), the Northwest Power Planning Council, and the Bonneville Power Administration have agreed that the Yakama Nation would be funded to implement habitat restoration on lands within and adjacent to their reservation. Some of the targeted lands are owned by the Yakama Nation, some are trust lands, and some lands have been in private ownership. Since the early 1990s, the Yakama Nation has been in the process of assembling riparian lands into Wildlife Management Areas, and restoring natural hydrology and natural cover-types on these lands. The Northwest Power Planning Council, through the Bonneville Power Administration, has supported the program. HEP studies were performed by the Yakama Nation in 1990 (Bich et al. 1991) to establish baseline conditions and inventory wildlife habitat at the initiation of the restoration project. The 1990 HEP used a simplified version of the HEP to quantify baseline conditions. The present assessment is designed to evaluate the progress of the mitigation plan in meeting its stated goals. The 1999 HEP assessment has two distinct tasks: (1) Evaluation of the mitigation plan as currently implemented using the simplified YN HEP methodologies for the Wildlife Management Areas; and (2) Evaluation of the simplified YN HEP methodologies as a means of measuring mitigation progress.

Raedeke, Kenneth; Raedeke, Dorothy

2000-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Enforcement Letter-Sandia-07/21/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dr. Klaus Berkner [ ] University of California Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report: NTS-SAN--LBL-NSD-1997-0002 Dear Dr. Berkner: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's (LBNL) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). The noncompliances involved the repeated failure of a laboratory researcher during 1996 - 1997 to adhere to LBNL's work authorization process and radiological work controls during research activities with a radioactive isotope, [ ]. On May 27, 1998, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) issued a letter to you,

282

Enforcement Letter, Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex - April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex - April 13, 2010 April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex related to Deficiencies in the Fabrication of Safety Significant Embed Plates at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement's investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance deficiencies in the fabrication of safety significant embed plates. These embed plates were fabricated by Parsons Technology Development and Fabrication Complex (PTDFC) a supplier to

283

Post-Closure Inspection Letter Report for Corrective Action Units (CAUs) on the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS)  

SciTech Connect

This letter serves as the post-closure inspection letter report for CAUs on the NNSS for Calendar Year 2011

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2012-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

284

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Fish, Wildlife & Parks Fish, Wildlife & Parks Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Name Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Address 1420 East 6th Ave, PO Box 200701 Place Helena, Montana Zip 59620-0701 Phone number 406-444-2535 Website http://fwp.mt.gov/doingBusines Coordinates 46.586864°, -112.01525° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.586864,"lon":-112.01525,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

285

India-Legislation on Environment, Forests and Wildlife | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Legislation on Environment, Forests and Wildlife Legislation on Environment, Forests and Wildlife Jump to: navigation, search Name India-Legislation on Environment, Forests and Wildlife Agency/Company /Organization Government of India Sector Land Topics Policies/deployment programs, Background analysis Website http://www.envfor.nic.in/legis Country India UN Region South-Eastern Asia References India-Legislation on Environment, Forests and Wildlife[1] Overview "Category Name Water Pollution Air Pollution Environment Protection Coastal Regulation Zone Delegation of Powers Eco-marks Scheme Eco-sensitive Zone Environmental Clearance - General Environmental Labs Environmental Standards Hazardous Substances Management Loss Of Ecology Noise Pollution Ozone Layer Depletion Water Pollution 2-T Oil Public Liability Insurance

286

EA-0939: Blue Creek Winter Range: Wildlife Mitigation Project, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy's Bonneville Power Administration to secure land and conduct wildlife habitat enhancement and long term...

287

EA-1023: Willow Creek Wildlife Mitigation Project, Eugene, Oregon  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to fund habitat acquisition (of land or a conservation easement), wildlife...

288

Wildlife studies on the Hanford Site: 1993 Highlights report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) Wildlife Resources Monitoring Project was initiated by DOE to track the status of wildlife populations to determine whether Hanford operations affected them. The project continues to conduct a census of wildlife populations that are highly visible, economically or aesthetically important, and rare or otherwise considered sensitive. Examples of long-term data collected and maintained through the Wildlife Resources Monitoring Project include annual goose nesting surveys conducted on islands in the Hanford Reach, wintering bald eagle surveys, and fall Chinook salmon redd (nest) surveys. The report highlights activities related to salmon and mollusks on the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River; describes efforts to map vegetation on the Site and efforts to survey species of concern; provides descriptions of shrub-steppe bird surveys, including bald eagles, Canada geese, and hawks; outlines efforts to monitor mule deer and elk populations on the Site; and describes development of a biological database management system.

Cadwell, L.L. [ed.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

California high speed rail proposal: High speed rail and wildlife  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Wildlife and High Speed Rail C ALIFORNIA H IGH S PEED R AILLeavitt, California High Speed Rail Authority) Abstract TheCalifornia High Speed Rail (HSR) Proposal is in the initial

Wilkerson, Cynthia

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS Sam  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

321-1132. Sincerely, Kathy W. Lunceford Fish and Wildlife Biologist Cc: FWS, Atlanta, GA Attn: Jerry Ziewitz P.O. BOX 3658, TUPELO, MISSISSIPPI 38803-3658 WWW.WILDLIFETECHNICAL...

291

Schedule for 2013 Oak Ridge Wildlife Management Area (ORWMA)...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Schedule for 2013 Oak Ridge Wildlife Management Area (ORWMA) Spring Turkey Hunts Scouting day - April 6th Hunt Weekend - April 13th-14th Hunt Weekend - April 20th -21st These...

292

APPENDIX C AEERPS FISH AND WILDLIFE PROGRAM December 21, 1994  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and wildlife affected by the development, operation, and management of [hydropower] facilities while assuring and financially viable Bonneville Power Administration is essential to carrying out those purposes. The Council

293

Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook - Appendix: Literature Review Database  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wildlife Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook Appendix: Literature Review Database Volume II of II United States Office of Research EPA/600/R-93/187 Environmental Protection and Development December 1993 Agency (8603) Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook Appendix: Literature Review Database Volume II of II EPA/600/R-93/187 December 1993 WILDLIFE EXPOSURE FACTORS HANDBOOK APPENDIX: LITERATURE REVIEW DATABASE Volume II of II Office of Health and Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 Additional major funding for this Handbook was provided by the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response and by the Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

294

Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation Project, 2001 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Albeni Falls Interagency Work Group was actively engaged in implementing wildlife mitigation activities in 2001. The Work Group met quarterly to discuss management and budget issues affecting the Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation Program. Work Group members protected 851 acres of wetland habitat in 2001. Wildlife habitat protected to date for the Albeni Falls project is approximately 5,248.31 acres ({approx}4,037.48 Habitat Units). Approximately 14% of the total wildlife habitat lost has been mitigated. Administrative activities increased as funding was more evenly distributed among Work Group members and protection opportunities became more time consuming. In 2001, Work Group members focused on development and implementation of the monitoring and evaluation program as well as completion of site-specific management plans. With the implementation of the monitoring and evaluation program, and as management plans are reviewed and executed, on the ground management activities are expected to increase in 2002.

Terra-Burns, Mary (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Albeni Falls Interagency Work Group, Boise, ID)

2002-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

295

Analysis of Oil and Gas Production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4-04 4-04 Analysis of Oil and Gas Production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge March 2004 Energy Information Administration Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This Service Report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should be attributed to the Energy Information Administration and should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or of any other organization. Service Reports are prepared by the Energy Information Administration upon special request and are based on assumptions specified by the requestor.

296

Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning 0 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Attached is Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1560 or at jason.taylor@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash_MO Acq Planning AL.pdf AL_ 2013-03 Acq Planning_MO.pdf More Documents & Publications Attachment FY2011-09(3) Policy Flash 2013-78 Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.3 Acquisition Planning in

297

Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July 13, 2009 Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July 13, 2009 July 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc., related to a Form Wood Timber Fire at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies associated with the January 24, 2009, fire event described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-SRSO--PSC-SWPF-2009-0001, Form Wood Timber Fire. The evaluation included a review of documents and discussions with you and members of your staff. Parsons Infrastructure &

298

FAL 2006-04, Financial Assistance Letters Remaining in Effect  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Financial Assistance Letters (FALs) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued FALs Financial Assistance Letters (FALs) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued FALs have been superseded by a formal rulemaking, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. *************** Financial Assistance Letters Remaining in Effect Number Date Subject 2006-03 05/10/2006 Implementation Guidance for Awarding Technology Investment Agreements Financial Assistance Letters Discontinued Number Date Subject Disposition 2004-03 02/12/2004 Intellectual Property Moved to the Guide to Financial Assistance 2004-06 11/02/2004 Award Terms Moved to the Guide to Financial Assistance 2005-03 06/27/2005 Eligibility Determination Required by Section 2306 of the Energy Policy Act Moved to the Guide to

299

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 May 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to an Unintentional Firearm Discharge at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center at the Hanford Site, The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the accidental firearm discharge that occurred in an occupied classroom during training led by Ballelle at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center (HAMMER) in August 2009. The weapon discharge, which occurred during unsupervised student handling of a handgun, could have resulted in a fatal injury to one of the many students in the classroom. Battelle

300

Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu In July 2011, the Office of Diversity Programs concluded a comprehensive review of DOE's workforce diversity and inclusion policies and programs. The findings from this analysis, which have been shared with DOE senior management, indicate that we can do more to create a culture that values diversity, which in turn will make the Department an employer of choice and enhance our mission effectiveness. Read more about these efforts here. This letter from Secretary Chu directs Associate Deputy Secretary Mel Williams to take action on the following issues: Dialogue and Feedback Recruitment and Hiring Retention, Development, and Promotions Commitment and Understanding Performance and Accountability

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - February 26, 2003 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 26, 2003 February 26, 2003 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - February 26, 2003 February 26, 2003 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel Nevada related to Authorization Basis Noncompliances at the Nevada Test Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) review of the facts and circumstances related to certain nuclear safety noncompliances during 2002 at the Nevada Test Site. These noncompliances were identified in the process of conducting a limited Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) Program Review of Bechtel Nevada during November 14-15, 2002, by DOE's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE), in coordination with DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). These matters are being called to your attention through this Enforcement Letter since these noncompliances had not been

302

CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT This Fiscal Year 2008 Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Letter Report presents an evaluation of the adequacy of the one mill per kilowatt-hour fee paid by commercial nuclear power generators for the permanent disposal of their spent nuclear fuel by the Government. This evaluation recommends no fee change. CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT More Documents & Publications FY 2007 Fee Adequacy, Pub 2008 Fiscal Year 2007 Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Assessment Report January 16, 2013 Secretarial Determination of the Adequacy of the Nuclear

303

Letter: Transition of Closure Sites from the Office of Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Organizations From: Deputy Secretary of Energy, Kyle E. McSlarrow (DS-1) To: Todd Martin, Chair, Hanford Advisory Board This letter discusses the transition of closure sites...

304

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers After granting several waivers establishing an alternative test procedure for residential clothes washers, DOE sought the views of interested parties regarding the proper implementation of these waivers. Whirlpool responded to the DOE's inquiry with a number of comments to recommend a course of

305

DOE-L.__ PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS - COVER LETTER AND  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

L.__ PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS - COVER LETTER AND L.__ PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS - COVER LETTER AND VOLUME I, OFFER AND OTHER DOCUMENTS (a) Instruction - Cover Letter. The cover letter shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The solicitation number. (2) The name, address, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and electronic addresses of the Offeror. (3) A statement identifying any exceptions or deviations the Offeror is taking to the terms and conditions specified in the contract (Sections A through K of this solicitation, as amended). However, exceptions and/or deviations are not sought and the Government is under no obligation to enter into discussions. Exceptions or deviations may constitute a deficiency. (4) The names, titles, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and

306

Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter In July 2011, the Office of Diversity Programs concluded a comprehensive review of DOE's workforce diversity and inclusion policies and programs. The findings from this analysis, which have been shared with DOE senior management, indicate that we can do more to create a culture that values diversity, which in turn will make the Department an employer of choice and enhance our mission effectiveness. Read more about these efforts here. This letter from Secretary Chu directs Associate Deputy Secretary Mel Williams to take action on the following issues: Dialogue and Feedback Recruitment and Hiring Retention, Development, and Promotions Commitment and Understanding Performance and Accountability

307

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees February 1, 2013 - 11:00am Addthis U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department Secretary Chu Secretary Chu Former Secretary of Energy In a letter to Energy Department employees today, Energy Secretary Steven Chu highlighted the tremendous progress of the last four years, and

308

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to UT-Battelle, LLC related to a Radioactive Material Release at the Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement within the Office of Health, Safety and Security has conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2008-000 1, Operational Emergency at Building 6000, Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility. Our evaluation included a review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Management Investigation Team Report dated November 19, 2008, the associated corrective action plan,

309

Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Virginia to ENSR International of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing Responses to Comments made Concerning the Modified Protocol for Downwash Modeling-Mirant Potomac River, LLC Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing Responses to Comments made Concerning the Modified Protocol for Downwash Modeling-Mirant Potomac River, LLC Docket No. EO-05-01: Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing Responses to Comments made Concerning the Modified Protocol for Downwash Modeling-Mirant Potomac River, LLC. The comments are addressed for the most part in this letter. As to the electronic media containing the modeling files, an additional copy will be necessary for the public comment process. Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing

310

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 May 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to an Unintentional Firearm Discharge at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center at the Hanford Site, The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the accidental firearm discharge that occurred in an occupied classroom during training led by Ballelle at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center (HAMMER) in August 2009. The weapon discharge, which occurred during unsupervised student handling of a handgun, could have resulted in a fatal injury to one of the many students in the classroom. Battelle

311

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees February 1, 2013 - 11:00am Addthis U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department Secretary Chu Secretary Chu Former Secretary of Energy In a letter to Energy Department employees today, Energy Secretary Steven Chu highlighted the tremendous progress of the last four years, and

312

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar June 9, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON - U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu sent the following letter to Senator Richard Lugar today regarding Senator Lugar's "Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010." The text is below: June 9, 2010 The Honorable Richard Lugar United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Lugar: I welcome your introduction today of the Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010. In particular, I appreciate your ideas for reducing America's oil dependence - which has taken on greater urgency as a result of the BP oil spill. I also commend your focus on energy efficiency, which as you have noted is the fastest, cheapest route to our energy and climate change

313

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar June 9, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON - U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu sent the following letter to Senator Richard Lugar today regarding Senator Lugar's "Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010." The text is below: June 9, 2010 The Honorable Richard Lugar United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Lugar: I welcome your introduction today of the Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010. In particular, I appreciate your ideas for reducing America's oil dependence - which has taken on greater urgency as a result of the BP oil spill. I also commend your focus on energy efficiency, which as you have noted is the fastest, cheapest route to our energy and climate change

314

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, 1997 April 23, 1997 Issued to the University of Chicago related to Radiological Worker Training and Qualification Deficiencies at the Argonne National Laboratory-East This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the failure to complete the required radiological worker training or retraining for approximately 30 percent of ANL-E's 797 radiological workers, was identified by ANL-E on December 17, 1996, and reported to DOE on December

315

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers After granting several waivers establishing an alternative test procedure for residential clothes washers, DOE sought the views of interested parties regarding the proper implementation of these waivers. Whirlpool responded to the DOE's inquiry with a number of comments to recommend a course of

316

Enforcement Letter, Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex- April 13, 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex related to Deficiencies in the Fabrication of Safety Significant Embed Plates at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site,

317

BWXT Y-12 Enforcement Letter, June 15, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2006 Mr. George Dials General Manager BWXT Y-12 Y-12 National Security Complex P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8245 Subject: BWXT Y-12 Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Dials: The...

318

December 11, 2002, Board letter forwarding Recommendation 2002...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to DOE in a Board letter dated April 23,2002. 2. During a review at the Y-12 National Security Complex, the Board noted that the fire protection program for Building 92 12 B-l...

319

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison...

320

Blue Creek Winter Range : Wildlife Mitigation Project : Final Environmental Assessment.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) proposes to fund that portion of the Washington Wildlife Agreement pertaining to the Blue Creek Winter Range Wildlife Mitigation Project (Project) in a cooperative effort with the Spokane Tribe, Upper Columbia United Tribes, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). If fully implemented, the proposed action would allow the sponsors to protect and enhance 2,631 habitat units of big game winter range and riparian shrub habitat on 2,185 hectares (5,400 acres) of Spokane Tribal trust lands, and to conduct long term wildlife management activities within the Spokane Indian Reservation project area. This Final Environmental Assessment (EA) examines the potential environmental effects of securing land and conducting wildlife habitat enhancement and long term management activities within the boundaries of the Spokane Indian Reservation. Four proposed activities (habitat protection, habitat enhancement, operation and maintenance, and monitoring and evaluation) are analyzed. The proposed action is intended to meet the need for mitigation of wildlife and wildlife habitat adversely affected by the construction of Grand Coulee Dam and its reservoir.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration; United States. Bureau of Indian Affairs; Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation, Washington

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Hellsgate Winter Range : Wildlife Mitigation Project. Final Environmental Assessment.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) proposes to fund the Hellsgate Winter Range Wildlife Mitigation Project (Project) in a cooperative effort with the Colville Confederated Tribes and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). The proposed action would allow the sponsors to secure property and conduct wildlife management activities within the boundaries of the Colville Indian Reservation. This Final Environmental Assessment (EA) examines the potential environmental effects of acquiring and managing property for wildlife and wildlife habitat within a large project area. This area consists of several separated land parcels, of which 2,000 hectares (4,943 acres) have been purchased by BPA and an additional 4,640 hectares (11,466 acres) have been identified by the Colville Confederated Tribes for inclusion in the Project. Four proposed activities (habitat protection, habitat enhancement, operation and maintenance, and monitoring and evaluation) are analyzed. The proposed action is intended to meet the need for mitigation of wildlife and wildlife habitat that was adversely affected by the construction of Grand Coulee and Chief Joseph Dams and their reservoirs.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

with respect to the Emergency Petition and with respect to the Emergency Petition and Complaint Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public Service Commission with respect to the Emergency Petition and Complaint Docket No. EO-05-01: We have received the Petition and Complaint that you filed with the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on August 24, 2005, on behalf of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission. The Petition requests DOE to provide emergency relief under section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(a), to require continued operation ofthe Mirant Power Plant. DOE, in consultation with other Federal agencies, is examining this matter expeditiously to determine the facts necessary to render an appropriate decision.

323

Columbia Basin Wildlife Mitigation Project : Rainwater Wildlife Area Final Management Plan.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This Draft Management Plan has been developed by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) to document how the Rainwater Wildlife Area (formerly known as the Rainwater Ranch) will be managed. The plan has been developed under a standardized planning process developed by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for Columbia River Basin Wildlife Mitigation Projects (See Appendix A and Guiding Policies Section below). The plan outlines the framework for managing the project area, provides an assessment of existing conditions and key resource issues, and presents an array of habitat management and enhancement strategies. The plan culminates into a 5-Year Action Plan that will focus our management actions and prioritize funding during the Fiscal 2001-2005 planning period. This plan is a product of nearly two years of field studies and research, public scoping, and coordination with the Rainwater Advisory Committee. The committee consists of representatives from tribal government, state agencies, local government, public organizations, and members of the public. The plan is organized into several sections with Chapter 1 providing introductory information such as project location, purpose and need, project goals and objectives, common elements and assumptions, coordination efforts and public scoping, and historical information about the project area. Key issues are presented in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 discusses existing resource conditions within the wildlife area. Chapter 4 provides a detailed presentation on management activities and Chapter 5 outlines a monitoring and evaluation plan for the project that will help assess whether the project is meeting the intended purpose and need and the goals and objectives. Chapter 6 displays the action plan and provides a prioritized list of actions with associated budget for the next five year period. Successive chapters contain appendices, references, definitions, and a glossary.

Childs, Allen

2002-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

WIND POWER Impacts on Wildlife and Government Responsibilities for Regulating Development and Protecting Wildlife Why GAO Did This Study  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Wind power has recently experienced dramatic growth in the United States, with further growth expected. However, several wind power-generating facilities have killed migratory birds and bats, prompting concern from wildlife biologists and others about the species affected, and the cumulative effects on species populations. GAO assessed (1) what available studies and experts have reported about the impacts of wind power facilities on wildlife in the United

Protecting Wildlife

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit GRR/Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Regulations & Policies WAC 232-12-064 Triggers None specified In Washington, it is unlawful to take wildlife from the wild without permission from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The WDFW issues Live Wildlife Taking Permits under WAC 232-12-064. 12-WA-a - Live Wildlife Taking Permit.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

326

NSLS Services | Postal Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Postal Services Postal Services U.S. Postal Service BNL has a full-service U.S. Postal Service Office (Upton branch) located in Staff Services, Building 179, x2539. BNL Mail Service Mail is delivered and picked up twice a day from each building on site. Users should leave internal lab mail (brown envelopes, no stamps needed) and U.S. Mail (regular envelopes, stamps required) in the outgoing mail boxes at NSLS mail stop 725A, located in the lobby by the elevator. Receiving Mail During regular working hours, packages and other special deliveries are brought to the Stockroom while regular mail is taken to the mailstops around the building. Each beam port is assigned a mail slot at NSLS mail stop 725A near the elevator in the lobby. The beamline number should be on all mail addressed to users. Mail to users should be addressed as follows

327

Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Loss Assessment Summary at Federal Hydroelectric Facilities; Willamette River Basin, 1985 Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Habitat based assessments were conducted of the US Army Corps of Engineers' hydroelectric projects in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon, to determine losses or gains to wildlife and/or wildlife habitat resulting from the development and operation of the hydroelectric-related components of the facilities. Preconstruction, postconstruction, and recent vegetation cover types at the project sites were mapped based on aerial photographs. Vegetation cover types were identified within the affected areas and acreages of each type at each period were determined. Wildlife target species were selected to represent a cross-section of species groups affected by the projects. An interagency team evaluated the suitability of the habitat to support the target species at each project for each time period. An evaluation procedure which accounted for both the quantity and quality of habitat was used to aid in assessing impacts resulting from the projects. The Willamette projects extensively altered or affected 33,407 acres of land and river in the McKenzie, Middle Fork Willamette, and Santiam river drainages. Impacts to wildlife centered around the loss of 5184 acres of old-growth conifer forest, and 2850 acres of riparian hardwood and shrub cover types. Impacts resulting from the Willamette projects included the loss of critical winter range for black-tailed deer and Roosevelt elk, and the loss of year-round habitat for deer, upland game birds, furbearers, spotted owls, pileated woodpeckers, and many other wildlife species. Bald eagles and ospreys were benefited by an increase in foraging habitat. The potential of the affected areas to support wildlife was greatly altered as a result of the Willamette projects. Losses or gains in the potential of the habitat to support wildlife will exist over the lives of the projects. Cumulative or system-wide impacts of the Willamette projects were not quantitatively assessed.

Noyes, J.H.

1986-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Willow Creek Wildlife Mitigation Project. Final Environmental Assessment.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Today`s notice announces BPA`s proposal to fund land acquisition or acquisition of a conservation easement and a wildlife management plan to protect and enhance wildlife habitat at the Willow Creek Natural Area in Eugene, Oregon. This action would provide partial mitigation for wildlife and wildlife habitat lost by the development of Federal hydroelectric projects in the Willamette River Basin. The project is consistent with BPA`s obligations under provisions of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 as outlined by the Northwest Power Planning Council`s 1994 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. BPA has prepared an environmental assessment (DOE/EA-1023) evaluating the proposed project. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required and BPA is issuing this FONSI.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Bonneville Power Administration Wildlife Mitigation Program : Draft Environmental Impact Statement.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is responsible for mitigating the loss of wildlife habitat caused by the development of the Federal Columbia River Power System. BPA accomplishes this mitigation by funding projects consistent with those recommended by the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council). The projects are submitted to the Council from Indian Tribes, state agencies, property owners, private conservation groups, and other Federal agencies. Future wildlife mitigation actions with potential environmental impacts are expected to include land acquisition and management, water rights acquisition and management, habitat restoration and enhancement, installation of watering devices, riparian fencing, and similar wildlife conservation actions. BPA needs to ensure that individual wildlife mitigation projects are planned and managed with appropriate consistency across projects, jurisdictions, and ecosystems, as well as across time. BPA proposes to standardize the planning and implementation of individual wildlife mitigation projects funded by BPA. Alternative 1 is the No Action alternative. Five standardizing alternatives are identified to represent the range of possible strategies, goals, and procedural requirements reasonably applicable to BPA-funded projects under a standardized approach to project planning and implementation. All action alternatives are based on a single project planning process designed to resolve site-specific issues in an ecosystem context and to adapt to changing conditions and information.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation Project, 2008 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Albeni Falls Interagency Work Group (AFIWG) was actively involved in implementing wildlife mitigation activities in late 2007, but due to internal conflicts, the AFIWG members has fractionated into a smaller group. Implementation of the monitoring and evaluation program continued across protected lands. As of 2008, The Albeni Falls Interagency Work Group (Work Group) is a coalition comprised of wildlife managers from three tribal entities (Kalispel Tribe, Kootenai Tribe, Coeur d Alene Tribe) and the US Army Corps of Engineers. The Work Group directs where wildlife mitigation implementation occurs in the Kootenai, Pend Oreille and Coeur d Alene subbasins. The Work Group is unique in the Columbia Basin. The Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA) wildlife managers in 1995, approved what was one of the first two project proposals to implement mitigation on a programmatic basis. The maintenance of this kind of approach through time has allowed the Work Group to implement an effective and responsive habitat protection program by reducing administrative costs associated with site-specific project proposals. The core mitigation entities maintain approximately 9,335 acres of wetland/riparian habitats in 2008.

Soults, Scott [Kootenai Tribe of Idaho

2009-08-05T23:59:59.000Z

331

Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-36)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The compliance checklist for this project was originally completed by the Burns Paiute Tribe in 2000, and meets the standards and guidelines for the Wildlife Mitigation Program Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD), as well as the Watershed Management Program Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD). The Logan Valley Wildlife Mitigation Plan, now being implemented, continues to be consistent with the above mentioned EISs and RODs. Pursuant to its obligations under the Endangered Species Act, BPA has made a determination of whether its proposed project will have any effects on any listed species under the jurisdiction of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). A species list was obtained from USFWS on June 12, 2003, identifying bald eagles, Canada lynx, and bull trout as potentially occurring in the project area. A site assessment was conducted on July 15, 2003 to determine if these species were present and the potential effects of project activities. A ''No Effect'' determination was made for all ESA-listed species. There were no listed species under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries present in the project area. As management activities proceed in the future, BPA will annually re-assess potential effects of planned activities on listed species. The Burns-Paiute Tribe conducted a literature search for historic and archaeological sites on the property on January 11, 1999. No known sites were identified. Further site-specific surveys will be conducted for individual ground disturbing activities. The results of these surveys will be sent to the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office and BPA. BPA will annually summarize and submit a report to the State Historic Preservation Office. On December 29, 1999, Fred Walasavage of BPA completed a Phase I Site Assessment and concluded that the site did not reveal any environmental factors that would pose a significant liability for remedial action or cleanup under the Comprehensive Recovery, Compensation and Liability Act. A public meeting was held when the property was initially acquired where the property acquisition and proposed activities were discussed. Subsequent public involvement was conducted on July 23, 2002 for commenting on the proposed Logan Valley Wildlife Mitigation Plan.

N /A

2003-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

332

Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies associated with the Super High-Efficiency Neutron Counter Non-Destructive Assay System Refurbishment at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-CBFO-WIPP-WIPP-2006-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation/causal analysis and discussion with you and other site personnel during an informal conference held on August 1, 2006. Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions -September 8, 2006

333

Enforcement Letter, LANL - July 7, 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 2003 July 7, 2003 Enforcement Letter, LANL - July 7, 2003 July 7, 2003 Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Laboratory related to Negative Performance Trends The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) is concerned that nuclear safety at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL/Laboratory) continues to demonstrate a negative performance trend. Our observations are based on numerous recent events involving both nuclear safety and radiological control issues. Since our last discussions at the March 2003 LANL Price-Anderson Amendments Act Enforcement Conference, my office has reviewed numerous nuclear safety and radiological events as part of enforcement action follow-up and monitoring. Enforcement Letter, LANL - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications

334

Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 October 28, 2004 Issued to Diversified Metal Products, Inc. related to Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter addresses deficiencies associated with the fabrication of four transportainers delivered under contract to Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) in support of their Characterization and Repackaging Modular Unit development. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed your performance in delivering these transportainers and is concerned with the quality assurance aspects of your work activities in fabricating the transportainers. Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004

335

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

West - February 9, West - February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to a Dropped Fuel Basket Assembly and Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-West This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning two incidents occurring in June and August 1998 at Argonne National Laboratory - West's (ANLW) Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF): dropping a fuel basket assembly containing chopped fuel elements and repair of a manipulator seal tube. During November 2-3, 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear safety regulations may have

336

Enforcement Letter, Sandia National Laboratories - February 27, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Laboratories - February 27, National Laboratories - February 27, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Sandia National Laboratories - February 27, 1998 February 27, 1998 Issued to Sandia Corporation related to Work Control Deficiencies associated with operating Radiation Generating Devices at Sandia National Laboratories. This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of Sandia National Laboratories' (SNL's) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). The noncompliances, which involved operational and work control deficiencies related to the use of three radiation generating devices (RGDs), were identified on October 1, 1997, and reported to DOE on October 21, 1997, in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). Enforcement Letter, Sandia National Laboratories - February 27, 1998

337

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Inc - March 25, 2004 National Inc - March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Concrete Work Issues at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford Site This letter addresses eleven instances that have occurred at the Waste Treatment Plant during a 14-month period form August 2002 through October 2003 in which concrete work was not performed to established procedures and standards. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these inspect concrete work prior to pour. In addition, OE is concerned with your failure to correct these known problems in a timely manner. It is our expectation that Bechtel National Inc. (BNI) has quality improvement programs in place to prevent recurrence

338

Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No.  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 - Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 - Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 - Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads. This is the cover letter to additional comments submitted by PMI after alerting the DOE to its belief that the Interpretive Rule should be subject

339

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2010-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WEL-2010-02 WEL-2010-02 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2010-02 December 23, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to a flash fire event at the Nevada National Security Site The Office of Enforcement reviewed the NSTec fire investigation report, management review report, root cause analysis (RCA), and corrective action plan; the Martin-Harris Construction Environmental, Safety and Health Plan; and the construction subcontract and accompanying exhibits. The Office of Enforcement also obtained and reviewed a number of core company directives, assessments, and inspection documents identified in exhibit E of the subcontract. Enforcement Letter, WEL-2010-02 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security - May 2013

340

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - April 1, 2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nevada - April 1, 2002 Nevada - April 1, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - April 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel Nevada related to Noncompliances with Occupational Radiation Protection and Quality Assurance Requirements at the Nevada Test Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Bechtel Nevada's (BN) report of noncompliances with the occupational radiation protection and quality assurance provisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at the Nevada Test Site Reactor-Maintenance, Assembly and Disassembly (R-MAD) facility. The issues involved several failures to follow BN's established work controls and resulted in the uncontrolled breech of a posted radiological area boundary for a hot cell undergoing decommissioning. This was reported by your staff into the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Enforcement Letter; Quality Assurance Deficiencies Related to Weapon Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2005 2, 2005 Dr. Michael R. Anastasio Director Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, L-001 Livermore, CA 94550 Subject: Enforcement Letter - Quality Assurance Deficiencies Related to Weapon Activities Dear Dr. Anastasio: This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. During the dismantlement of a retired nuclear weapon, for which LLNL was the design

342

Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 October 28, 2004 Issued to Diversified Metal Products, Inc. related to Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter addresses deficiencies associated with the fabrication of four transportainers delivered under contract to Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) in support of their Characterization and Repackaging Modular Unit development. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed your performance in delivering these transportainers and is concerned with the quality assurance aspects of your work activities in fabricating the transportainers. Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004

343

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security - February 16, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- February 16, - February 16, 2007 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security - February 16, 2007 February 16, 2007 Letter to Los Alamos National Security, LLC regarding the Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Operational Performance at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Today the enclosed Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) was issued to the University of California related to operational performance deficiencies at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Although civil penalties associated with the prior contract were waived by statute, the proposed penalty would have equaled $1.1 million dollars. Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security-February 16, 2007 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Los Alamos National Laboratory -

344

Enforcement Letter, LANL - October 9, 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 9, 2001 October 9, 2001 Enforcement Letter, LANL - October 9, 2001 October 9, 2001 Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Laboratory related to Quality Assurance Provisions at the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) report of noncompliances with quality assuranceprovisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility (LACEF) TA-18. These issues involved violations of theestablished LACEF Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) and were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff (NTS-ALO-LA-LANL-TA18-2000-0001) on February 25, 2000. These noncompliances were a part of the enforcement action issued by DOE to LANL in December

345

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - July 21, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - July 21, 1998 July 21, 1998 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Work Controls at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's (LBNL) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). The noncompliances involved the repeated failure of a laboratory researcher during 1996 - 1997 to adhere to LBNL's work authorization process and radiological work controls during research activities with a radioactive isotope, [ ]. On May 27, 1998, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) issued a letter to you, requesting information regarding this noncompliance

346

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Inc - March 25, 2004 National Inc - March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Concrete Work Issues at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford Site This letter addresses eleven instances that have occurred at the Waste Treatment Plant during a 14-month period form August 2002 through October 2003 in which concrete work was not performed to established procedures and standards. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these inspect concrete work prior to pour. In addition, OE is concerned with your failure to correct these known problems in a timely manner. It is our expectation that Bechtel National Inc. (BNI) has quality improvement programs in place to prevent recurrence

347

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to a Dropped Fuel Basket Assembly and Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-West This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning two incidents occurring in June and August 1998 at Argonne National Laboratory - West's (ANLW) Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF): dropping a fuel basket assembly containing chopped fuel elements and repair of a manipulator seal tube. During November 2-3, 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear safety regulations may have

348

Enforcement Letter, Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Intermech, Inc. related to Installation and Inspection of Anchor Bolts and Pipe Supports at the DUF6 Conversion Buildings at the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with deficiencies in the installation and inspection of anchor bolts and pipe supports at the DUF6 Conversion Buildings, located at the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants. The investigation report, dated April 23, 2009, was provided under separate cover. Potential violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management,

349

Enforcement Letter, BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 Enforcement Letter, BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 July 10, 2003 Enforcement Letter issued to BNFL, Inc. related to potential violations of Quality Assurance Requirements at the East Tennessee Technology Park This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) review of the facts and circumstances related to several Price-Anderson noncompliances, which are documented in the following Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports NTS-ORO--BNFL-K33-2003-0001, "Weaknesses in BNFL's Issue Screening Process to Determine PAAA Noncompliance." This report documents that the BNFL PAAA Review Board failed to correctly identify and report the vast majority of reportable noncompliances NTS-ORO--BNFL-K33-2003-0002, "Weaknesses in the Management

350

Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26, 2010 March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, Inc. related to Installation and Inspection of Penetration Fire Seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with deficiencies in the installation and inspection of penetration fire seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building, located at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. DOE's investigation report, dated January 22, 2009, was provided to Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (Geiger) under

351

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - February 24, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 24, February 24, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - February 24, 2000 February 24, 2000 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to Bioassay Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-East, February 24, 2000 This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the above referenced Noncompliance Tracking System(NTS) report describing bioassay program deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E). This report was submitted to DOE on December 23, 1999. Approximately thirteen months previous to this NTS report's submittal, DOE's Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-Enforcement) issued to all DOE and contractor Price-Anderson Amendments Act coordinators a

352

Enforcement Letter, Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Amer Industrial Technologies related to Weld Deficiencies at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, April 13, 2010 This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement's investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance deficiencies in safety significant drain pipe fabricated by Amer Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) as a supplier to Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. (Parsons) for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) construction project at the Department of Energy (DOE) Savanuah River Site. The contract between Parsons and AIT was

353

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 July 30, 2013 Issued to Wastren Advantage, Inc. related to the Loss of Supplied Breathing Air in the Box Breakdown Area of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding a loss of breathing air within the Box Breakdown Area (BBA) of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center (TWPC), which led to the expedited egress of two workers in supplied-air suits and one worker in a supplied-air hood. Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI) manages and operates the TWPC, located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, under a contract with DOE and is

354

Microsoft Word - supplemental comment letter.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 23, 2006 Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Dear Mr. Mansueti: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., submits the following comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) February 17 Order for Rehearing Emergency Order 202-05-3. District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO- 05-01, Order No. 202-06-01 (Dep't of Energy, Feb. 17, 2006).

355

Collaboratives for Wildlife-Wind Turbine Interaction Research: Fostering Multistakeholder Involvement (Poster)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This poster highlights the various wildlife-wind collaboratives (specific to wildlife-wind turbine interaction research) that currently exist. Examples of collaboratives are included along with contact information, objectives, benefits, and ways to advance the knowledge base.

Sinclair, K.

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Instrumenting Wildlife Water Developments to Collect Hydrometeorological Data in Remote Western U.S. Catchments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In the arid western United States, wildlife water developments, or guzzlers, are important water sources for wildlife, and consist of impermeable roof structures designed to intercept precipitation and small tanks for storing water. Guzzlers are ...

Nicholas Grant; Laurel Saito; Mark Weltz; Mark Walker; Christopher Daly; Kelley Stewart; Christo Morris

2013-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-148- McNary Wildlife (McNary-Santiam #2))  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-148- McNary Wildlife (McNary-Santiam #2)) Mark Newbill - TFE/Chemawa Proposed Action: Joint project with US Forest Service for vegetation control for the McNary- Santiam #2 230 kV transmission line that enhances wildlife habitat under powerlines. Location: The project is located in the BPA Eugene Region within Marion County, Oregon. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) in cooperation with US Forest Service. Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way by hand cutting or machine mowing. The overall goal is to remove small fir trees, brushy

358

Bonneville Power Administration Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan Final EIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: 1: Environmental Analyses DOE/EIS-0312 April 2003 Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0312) Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Title of Proposed Action: Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan States and Provinces Involved: Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, and British Columbia Abstract: Despite the efforts of BPA and other regional entities in the Pacific Northwest, some populations of fish and wildlife continue to decline. Reasons for the lack of success include the following: different groups have different values and priorities; there is no clear and agreed-upon scientific answer; and there are conflicting

359

EIS-0312: Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan 2: Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan EIS-0312: Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan SUMMARY In this final environmental impact statement (FEIS), with the benefit of public comment and participation, BPA has developed and proposes a Preferred Alternative (PA 2002) that substantially combines elements of the Weak Stock and Sustainable Use alternatives and that falls within the established range of potential Policy Direction alternatives. This FEIS evaluates the environmental consequences of BPA's implementation and funding of sample actions that could emerge from any of the Policy Directions. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 26, 2012 EIS-0312: Notice of Availability of the Bonneville Power Administration

360

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Corporation - September Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements Implementation at the B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho Technologies Company - Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 August 4, 1998 Issued to Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company related to a Repetitive Problem with Instrument Operability at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report for noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120, "Quality Assurance Requirements." The NTS report addresses a repetitive problem of maintaining the operability of radiation monitoring instrumentation and systems referenced in nuclear facilities authorization

362

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

363

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

364

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August August 22, 1996 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22, 1996 August 22, 1996 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance involved the failure to complete required radiological worker retraining for 49 percent of LLNL's approximately 700 radiological workers. The training issue was initially identified on May 6, 1996, by LLNL during a routine review of the Chemistry and Materials Science deficiency

365

DOE/NV/26383-LTR2008-01 Letter Report Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Caliente, Lincoln County, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Beatty, Sarcobatus Flats, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat NWR, Crater Flat, and Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Engelbrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2009-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

366

Appendix A -1 Appendix A: The Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

with the central effort to protect and restore habitat and avoid adverse impacts to native fish and wildlife

367

Integrating Wildlife Crossing into Transportation Plans and Projects in North America  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for wildlife in future transportation projects. Traditionaleffects of existing and future transportation projects. Ourand overpasses into future transportation project, everyday

Cramer, Patricia C.; Bissonette, John

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

Continued on next page A letter explaining the 2005 HVAC  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Continued on next page A letter explaining the 2005 HVAC Change-out to consumers is available this bulletin, or downloaded from the 2005 HVAC Change out Information website at: www.energy.ca.gov/title24 duct sealing requirements for HVAC change-outs in existing homes become effective October 1, 2005

369

Resource Letter PTG-1: Precision Tests of Gravity  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Resource Letter provides an introduction to some of the main current topics in experimental tests of general relativity as well as to some of the historical literature. It is intended to serve as a guide to the field for upper-division undergraduate and graduate students

Clifford M. Will

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

Book Reviews Gerber, Alexandra. 2010. `The Letter versus the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Book Reviews 485 Gerber, Alexandra. 2010. `The Letter versus the Spirit: Barriers to Meaningful for Higher Education Cheltenham, 2008: Edward Elgar Publishing (and TIA-CREFF), 191 pp. This book brings rare. Most of the authors in this book use the concept of `generations' to discuss in broad terms how

Heller, Don

371

Letter to the Editor Geomagnetic storm eects at low latitudes  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Letter to the Editor Geomagnetic storm eects at low latitudes R. G. Rastogi School of Physics, Ahmedabad 380 009, India Received: 30 April 1998 / Accepted: 3 September 1998 Abstract. The geomagnetic corrected for geomagnetic latitudes. The disturbance daily variation of H at equatorial stations showed

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

372

Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery Fish & Wildlife Subbasin Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of volumes that together comprise a Recovery and Subbasin Plan for Washington lower Columbia River salmon Subbasin Plans Subbasin vision, assessments, and management plan for each of 12 Washington lower Columbia of Engineers Lee VanTussenbrook, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

373

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Name Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Address 3406 Cherry Ave. NE Place Salem, Oregon Zip 97303 Phone number 800-720-ODFW Website http://www.dfw.state.or.us/ Coordinates 44.974582°, -123.020498° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.974582,"lon":-123.020498,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

374

APPENDIX C AEERPS FISH AND WILDLIFE PROGRAM December 21, 1994  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of combustion turbine power plants (Table 1) should allow these plants to be developed "from scratch," providing, 1994 C-5 FISH AND WILDLIFE PROGRAM Table 1 Representative Combustion Turbine Power Plant Development as well as the effects of contingencies in large thermal plant operation and intertie availability were

375

Scotch Creek Wildlife Area 2007-2008 Annual Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Scotch Creek Wildlife Area is a complex of 6 separate management units located in Okanogan County in North-central Washington State. The project is located within the Columbia Cascade Province (Okanogan sub-basin) and partially addresses adverse impacts caused by the construction of Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee hydroelectric dams. With the acquisition of the Eder unit in 2007, the total size of the wildlife area is now 19,860 acres. The Scotch Creek Wildlife Area was approved as a wildlife mitigation project in 1996 and habitat enhancement efforts to meet mitigation objectives have been underway since the spring of 1997 on Scotch Creek. Continuing efforts to monitor the threatened Sharp-tailed grouse population on the Scotch Creek unit are encouraging. The past two spring seasons were unseasonably cold and wet, a dangerous time for the young of the year. This past spring, Scotch Creek had a cold snap with snow on June 10th, a critical period for young chicks just hatched. Still, adult numbers on the leks have remained stable the past two years. Maintenance of BPA funded enhancements is necessary to protect and enhance shrub-steppe and to recover and sustain populations of Sharp-tailed grouse and other obligate species.

Olson, Jim [Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

2008-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

376

Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, at Barbara Binney@hq.doe.gov or at (202) 287-1340 Policy Flash 2013-51.pdf Policy Flash 2013- Attachment AL 2013-05 FAL 2013-03 April 24 2013 final.pdf Attachment 1 DOE Section 311 Contract Award letter FY2013 April 26.pdf Attachment 2A DOE Section 311 Financial Assistance Letter FY2013 April 26.pdf Attachment 2B DOE Section 311 Financial Assistance Letter FY2013 April 26.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2014-04 Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014 -- Congressional

377

Joint Hydraulic Institute/ASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Joint Hydraulic InstituteASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification of Point 2 Joint Hydraulic InstituteASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification of Point 2 We would like to...

378

Information for a Letter of Recommendation to be written by Dr. Craig S. Hood, Biol. Sci.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Information for a Letter of Recommendation to be written by Dr. Craig S. Hood, Biol. Sci. Dear for a Letter of Recommendation to be written by Dr. Craig S. Hood, Biol. Sci. By signing below, I am waiving

Hood, Craig

379

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-06 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

06 Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-06 January 21, 2007 Office of Science's Implementation of the Federal Information Security Management Act Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-12-06 More...

380

Post-Closure Inspection Letter Report for Corrective Action Units on the Nevada National Security Site  

SciTech Connect

This letter serves as the post-closure inspection letter report for corrective action units on the Nevada National Security Site for calendar year 2011. Copies of completed inspection checklists are included in this report.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2011-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Response by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to Order No. 202-05-03 Response by PJM to letters from the City of...

382

EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors Rule 15 July 2013. EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors Rule 15 July 2013. This...

383

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-14 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department reported its annual performance results in conjunction with its consolidated financial statements. Topic: Management and Administration Audit Letter Report:...

384

Joint Hydraulic Institute/ASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification of Point #2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

We would like to clarify point #2 in the referenced letter, which addressed potential energy conservation standards for residential circulators.

385

Establishing Site X: Letter, Arthur H. Compton to Enrico Fermi, September 14, 1942  

DOE R&D Accomplishments (OSTI)

This letter from Compton to Fermi describes developments bearing on the establishment of site X (which, as of the letter date, is definitely determined as at the Tennessee Valley) for the construction of a pile and associated pilot plant buildings, describes the situation as of the letter date, and offers counsel as to how to proceed.

Compton, A. H.

1942-09-00T23:59:59.000Z

386

Transportation Services | Staff Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transportation Services Transportation Services The BNL Transportation Office, located at 20 Brookhaven Avenue, Building 400A, is available to assist BNL employees, guests and visitors with transportation needs in support of Laboratory programs. The hours of operation are 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. To contact the Transportation Office call (631) 344-2535. Stony Brook Parking Passes The Transportation Office has a limited number of parking passes for the three (3) parking garages at Stony Brook University. The passes are available to and are intended for use by BNL employees/scientific staff on official business only. Passes may be used at the Administration, University Hospital and Health Services Center garages on the Stony Brook campus when visiting SBU on official business.

387

Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 June 7, 2000 Issued to Savannah River Ecology Laboratory related to Radioactive Material Control Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of radioactive material control deficiencies occurring at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) in September 1999. During the underlying event, SREL investigators transported radioactive environmental samples from the Ukraine to SREL and University of Georgia facilities without appropriate labeling, monitoring, and controls. These deficiencies were identified in September 1999; however, they were not formally reported to DOE via the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) until March 14, 2000. The Office

388

Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technologies LLC,- November Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to an Unplanned Radiological Exposure during a Borehole Activity at the Nevada Test Site The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report NTS-NSO--NST-NTS-2007-0002, Unplanned Radiological Exposure during Borehole Activity. Our evaluation included reviews of the associated critique and root cause analysis reports, and the related corrective action plan. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. 835, Occupational Radiation Protection,occurred

389

Enforcement Letter, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 April 15, 1999 Issued to Stony Brook University Hospital related to a Failed Interlock at the Radiation Therapy Facility at the Brookhaven National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning an event at the Radiation Therapy Facility (RTF) occurring in March 1998. In November 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine whether violations of DOE's nuclear safety rules associated with the event had occurred. The resulting Investigation Summary Report was transmitted to you on February 19, 1999. On March 11, 1999, you participated in an Enforcement Conference, along with Brookhaven

390

Enforcement Letter-Oak Ridge-07/30/1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Robert Van Hook, Jr. Robert Van Hook, Jr. [ ] Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8001 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Van Hook: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the unexpected uptakes of a radioactive material, [ ], by employees at the Y-12 Plant subsequent to the June 8, 1998, restart of [ ] operations [ ]. These uptakes occurred at Y-12 Buildings 9212 and 9215 and involved 55 workers over a period of approximately five months. Radiation doses received by these workers ranged from 115 to 1124 millirem committed effective dose equivalent. During April 6-7, 1999, DOE conducted an investigation of these uptakes to determine what, if any, noncompliances with nuclear safety regulations may have occurred. A copy of the

391

Letter from Commonwealth to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide Letter from Commonwealth to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide Docket No. EO-05-01: Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to Mirant Potomac River concerning Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide. Notification to Mirant by the Commonwealth of Virginia of Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide More Documents & Publications Notification to Mirant by the Commonwealth of Virginia of Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited

392

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Issued to the University of California related to Potential Quality Assurance Rule Violations associated with an Explosion and Fire at the Los Alamos National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The noncompliances involved the failure of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to adequately implement the requirements contained in the governing quality assurance standard for stockpile evaluations in the areas of work controls and procedural compliance. As a result of these failures, an explosion and fire occurred at the [ ] on November 14, 1996.

393

Enforcement Letter - Savannah River-07/21/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 1998 21, 1998 Mr. A. L. Schwallie [ ] Westinghouse Savannah River Company Building 703-A, P.O. Box 616 Road 1 Aiken, SC 29802 Subject: Enforcement Letter Incomplete Corrective Action for Noncompliance Report: NTS-SR--WSRC-SLDHZD-1996-0001 Dear Mr. Schwallie: The Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) has received your letter dated June 30, 1998, Subject: Notification of Incomplete Corrective Action, in which you report that one corrective action for the above referenced NTS report was not completed and only partially implemented in the field. This action dealt with developing and implementing qualification standards for Generator Certification Officials and was reported by Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) as being completed June 30, 1997.

394

Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to Radiological Work Practices at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory The subject NTS report described multiple deficiencies identified through a DOE-RL assessment of contamination control and survey practices associated with fume hood work at the PNNL Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. The DOE-RL assessment was formally transmitted to PNNL on November 10, 2003. Specific deficiencies identified as part of the DOE assessment included multiple instances of workers failing to perform required contamination self-surveys, workers performing incomplete or cursory self-surveys, and workers failing to perform or

395

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements Implementation at the B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program and reported to DOE on May 24, 1995.

396

Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WEL-2012-05 WEL-2012-05 Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 December 20, 2012 Enforcement Letter issued to Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, related to an Electrical Shock Near Miss Incident that occurred on February 27, 2012, at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated an electrical shock near miss incident that occurred on February 27, 2012, at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (Alliance) manages and operates NREL under a contract with the Department of Energy (DOE) and is subject to the provisions of DOE's Worker Safety and Health Program rule (10 C.F.R. Part 851). The event revealed weaknesses in Alliance's electrical hazard

397

Enforcement Letter -Rocky Flats-08/02/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2000 , 2000 Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Highway 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The potential noncompliances involved inadequate implementation of work controls, specifically failure to perform required combustible gas surveillances. The failure to fully perform the required surveillances was identified by the contractor during a comprehensive Kaiser-Hill (KHLL) Implementation Validation Review (IVR) team verifying implementation of the Basis of Interim Operation (BIO) for Buildings 776 and

398

Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

\~ \~ , United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE. January 30, 2009 REPLY TO ATTNOF IG-40 sueJEcT Letter Report on "Questionable Purchases at the Hanford Site," INS-L-09-02, S09IS002 TO. Manager, Richland Operations Office Manager, Office of River Protection This letter report provides the results of an Office of Inspector General inspection of questionable purchases at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site (Hanford). During a review of the procurement card program at the Fluor Hanford Company (Fluor), we learned that Fluor and another Hanford prime contractor, CH2M Hill Hanford Company (CH2M Hill), had used Government funds to purchase overtime meals for employees. In addition, we learned Fluor had used Government funds to purchase gift items that were given away to

399

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. - September 4,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Systems, Inc. - Energy Systems, Inc. - September 4, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. - September 4, 1997 September 4, 1997 Issued to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc., related to the Erroneous Transfer of Mixed Waste to a Landfill at the K-25 Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the erroneous transfer, during December 1996 through January 1997, of 165 55-gallon drums of mixed waste ash from K-25 to 'a Y-12 industrial landfill' for disposal. This incident was determined by DOE to be, in part, the result of several noncompliances with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 830, "Nuclear Safety Management" (10 CFR 830). Lockheed Martin Energy Systems' (LMES) procedures did not provide adequate

400

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Company - April 15, Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 April 15, 1997 Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Potential Violations of Quality Assurance and Work Process Requirements at the Savannah River Site On February 11, 1997, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) met with members of your staff and the DOE Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR) to review your progress in correcting the noncompliances identified in the subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports. A summary of our meeting and assessment of the information provided is enclosed with this letter. Your evaluation of the events and conditions leading to each of the occurrences, reported to EH-10 in the subject NTS reports, has identified

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Enforcement Letter - Los Alamos National Laboratory, October 9, 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 9, 2001 October 9, 2001 Dr. John Browne [ ] Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Browne: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) report of noncompliances with quality assurance provisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility (LACEF) TA-18. These issues involved violations of the established LACEF Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) and were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff (NTS-ALO-LA-LANL-TA18-2000- 0001) on February 25, 2000. These noncompliances were a part of the enforcement action issued by DOE to LANL in December 2000 (EA 2000-13). Commitments in this NTS report include corrective action number 7 that stated "All

402

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Issued to the University of California related to Potential Quality Assurance Rule Violations associated with an Explosion and Fire at the Los Alamos National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The noncompliances involved the failure of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to adequately implement the requirements contained in the governing quality assurance standard for stockpile evaluations in the areas of work controls and procedural compliance. As a result of these failures, an explosion and fire occurred at the [ ] on November 14, 1996.

403

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to UT-Battelle, LLC related to a Radioactive Material Release at the Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement within the Office of Health, Safety and Security has conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2008-000 1, Operational Emergency at Building 6000, Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility. Our evaluation included a review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Management Investigation Team Report dated November 19, 2008, the associated corrective action plan,

404

Enforcement Letter - Rocky Flats -07/20/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 1998 , 1998 Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site P.O. Box 464 Golden, CO 80402-0464 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Reports NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-1997-0006 NTS-RFO--KHLL-371OPS-1997-0002 NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-1997-0010 NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-1998-0001 Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of Energy=s (DOE) evaluation of noncompliances reported in four Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) entries, identified in the subject line above. The four NTS reports were submitted between September 24, 1997, and March 3, 1998. The reports identified potential noncompliances with requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) and 10 CFR 835 (Radiation Protection Rule). The Office of Enforcement and Investigation evaluated these NTS reports based on the

405

Enforcement Letter -Savannah River-06/07/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2000 7, 2000 Paul Bertsch, PhD [ ] Savannah River Ecology Laboratory Drawer E Aiken, SC 29802 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-SR--SREL-2000-0001) Dear Dr. Bertsch: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of radioactive material control deficiencies occurring at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) in September 1999. During the underlying event, SREL investigators transported radioactive environmental samples from the Ukraine to SREL and University of Georgia facilities without appropriate labeling, monitoring, and controls. These deficiencies were identified in September 1999; however, they were not formally reported to DOE via the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) until March 14, 2000. The Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-Enforcement) staff discussed the details of the

406

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - May 31, 2002 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- May 31, 2002 - May 31, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - May 31, 2002 May 31, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to UT-Battelle, LLC related to Unplanned Radiation Exposures at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2002-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation report, associated corrective action plan, and discussion with site personnel. The subject NTS report described a series of deficiencies that resulted in several personnel being exposed to unanticipated radiation fields during the startup testing of an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) source at the

407

Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to Radiological Work Practices at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory The subject NTS report described multiple deficiencies identified through a DOE-RL assessment of contamination control and survey practices associated with fume hood work at the PNNL Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. The DOE-RL assessment was formally transmitted to PNNL on November 10, 2003. Specific deficiencies identified as part of the DOE assessment included multiple instances of workers failing to perform required contamination self-surveys, workers performing incomplete or cursory self-surveys, and workers failing to perform or

408

Letter, June 14, 2007, Preliminary Notice of Violation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 14, 2007 June 14, 2007 Dr. Robert Iotti President and Chief Executive Officer CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, L.L.C. 2525 Freemont Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-5104 Dear Dr. Iotti: This letter refers to the investigation of events at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project (ARP) by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement. The investigation summary report, Multiple Radiological Protection Program Deficiencies and Safety Culture Concerns, was provided to you in a letter dated February 20, 2007. An enforcement conference to discuss these findings was held on March 21, 2007, in Germantown, Maryland, with you and members of your staff. A summary of the conference is enclosed. Based on our evaluation of the evidence in this matter,

409

Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC related to a Failed Scram Event at the Neutron Radiography Reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies associated with the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) report NE-ID--BEA-NRAD-2008-0003, Shim Rod #2 Failure to SCRAM. Our evaluation included a review of documents and discussions with site personnel. Documents reviewed included the Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) Cause Analysis Report and Corrective Action Plan NE-ID-BEA-NRAD-2008-0003, Shim

410

Enforcement Letter, Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 Enforcement Letter, Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 October 24, 2011 Enforcement Letter issued to Safety and Ecology Corporation related to Two Radiological Contamination Events at the Separations Process Research Unit at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight conducted an evaluation of the two contamination events at the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) in Niskayuna, New York. On August 24, 2010, contaminated sludge leaked from two pumps inside the Building H2 Tank Farm Weather Enclosure after excessive pressure was applied to clear a clogged nozzle. The sludge contained radioisotopes from nuclear fuel reprocessing

411

Enforcement Letter, Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Isotek Systems, LLC related to Quality Assurance Issues associated with the U233 Material Downblending and Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System Report NTS-ORO--ISOTEK-3019-2008-0001. Our evaluation included a review ofIsotek Systems, LLC (Isotek) causal factors analysis and corrective actions, and other requested documentation, as well as discussions with Isotek senior management and DOE Oak Ridge Office

412

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - August 6, 1996 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 6, August 6, 1996 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - August 6, 1996 August 6, 1996 Issued to the University of Chicago related to an Unplanned and Uncontrolled Employee Radiation Exposure at the Argonne National Laboratory-East This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the unexpected, uncontrolled radiation exposure of an ANL-E temporary employee during January- August 1995 was identified by ANL-E on December 11, 1995, and reported to DOE on March 1, 1996, in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). The exposure to the ANL-E temporary employee resulted from

413

Enforcement Letter-Savannah River-03/29/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Mr. Joseph J. Buggy, President [ ] Building 703-A Road 1 Aiken, SC 29802 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-SR-WSRC-ESH-1999-0002) Dear Mr. Buggy: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the referenced Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report which describes the failure to properly retrain portions of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) nonradiological workforce with General Employee Radiological Training (GERT) and the failure to provide such training to all temporary visitors and individuals badged at other DOE locations. These deficiencies were identified by the WSRC Price-Anderson Coordinator in a 10 CFR 835 assessment. The deficiencies identified were noncompliances with the following requirements:

414

Enforcement Letter - Oak Ridge - 09/04/1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 1997 4, 1997 Dr. Robert Van Hook [ ] Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8002 Subject: Enforcement Letter Occurrence Report ORO--LMES-K25WASTMAN-1997-0001 Dear Dr. Van Hook: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the erroneous transfer, during December 1996 through January 1997, of 165 55-gallon drums of mixed waste ash from K-25 to [a Y-12 industrial landfill] for disposal. This incident was determined by DOE to be, in part, the result of several noncompliances with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 830, "Nuclear Safety Management" (10 CFR 830). Lockheed Martin Energy Systems' (LMES) procedures did not provide adequate administrative control for the identification of drums intended for the Y-12 landfill nor for

415

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6, 1995 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 6, 1995 July 6, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6, 1995 July 6, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Radiological Work Control Deficiencies at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) investigation of an event that occurred between February 22-March 7, 1995, at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) at DOE's Hanford site. The event, which involved the cutting of a highly contaminated canyon exhaust air sampling probe as part of waste disposal activities without adequate management controls, resulted in your decision to temporarily curtail waste cutting activities. Based on your investigation of the event,

416

Microsoft Word - AcquisitionLetter95-14.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cooperation with the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cooperation with the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union The following Acquisition Letter 95-14 includes the terms and conditions (both intellectual property and non-intellectual property) that are to be used in subcontracts between DOE national laboratories and institutes in the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (NIS). There are two patent and data clauses - one for the Initiatives for Proliferation Program (IPP), formerly known as the Industrial Partnering Program, and one for all other DOE programs. AUTHORITY This Acquisition Letter (AL) is issued by the Procurement Executive pursuant to a delegation from the Secretary and under the authority of the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) subsections 901.301-70 and 901.301-71.

417

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2012-04 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-04 2-04 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2012-04 November 5, 2012 Enforcement Letter issued to URS E&C Holdings Incorporated, related to Regulatory Issues Associated with a Series of Fall Protection Occurrences at the Separations Process Research Unit Disposition Project The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated a series of fall protection occurrences associated with URS E&C Holdings Incorporated's (URS) operations at the Department of Energy (DOE) Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) Disposition Project (DP) in Niskayuna, New York. These occurrences took place between November 2011 and July 2012, and included an event involving a URS employee working close to a second floor wall opening in building G2 at SPRU on July 9,

418

Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 June 7, 2000 Issued to Savannah River Ecology Laboratory related to Radioactive Material Control Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of radioactive material control deficiencies occurring at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) in September 1999. During the underlying event, SREL investigators transported radioactive environmental samples from the Ukraine to SREL and University of Georgia facilities without appropriate labeling, monitoring, and controls. These deficiencies were identified in September 1999; however, they were not formally reported to DOE via the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) until March 14, 2000. The Office

419

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/31/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1998 1, 1998 Mr. R. D. Hanson [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. P.O. Box 1000 MS/H5-20 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Number NTS-RL--PHMC-PHMCGENL-1998-0003 Dear Mr. Hanson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the failure of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated (FDH) to effectively complete corrective actions for Enforcement Action 96-02 (EA 96-02), although FDH informed the DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) that such work had been completed. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(1)(iii) (Quality Improvement) mandates processes to detect and prevent quality problems be established and implemented. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(2)(i) (Work Processes) requires that work be performed to established technical standards

420

Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Security Technologies LLC,- November National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to an Unplanned Radiological Exposure during a Borehole Activity at the Nevada Test Site The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report NTS-NSO--NST-NTS-2007-0002, Unplanned Radiological Exposure during Borehole Activity. Our evaluation included reviews of the associated critique and root cause analysis reports, and the related corrective action plan. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. 835, Occupational Radiation Protection,occurred

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 July 22, 1013 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding programmatic deficiencies identified in the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) software quality assurance (SQA) program. LLNS reported these deficiencies on January 16, 2013, in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS--LSO-LLNL-LLNL-2013-0001, LLNL Software Quality Assurance Program Does Not Meet DOE 0 414.1 D Standards and Procedures Requirements. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) issued a letter to the

422

Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report; Iskuulpa Wildlife Mitigation and Watershed Project, Technical Report 1998-2003.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) were used to determine the number of habitat units credited to evaluate lands acquired and leased in Eskuulpa Watershed, a Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation watershed and wildlife mitigation project. The project is designed to partially credit habitat losses incurred by BPA for the construction of the John Day and McNary hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River. Upland and riparian forest, upland and riparian shrub, and grasslands cover types were included in the evaluation. Indicator species included downy woodpecker (Picuides puhescens), black-capped chickadee (Pams atricopillus), blue grouse (Beadragapus obscurus), great blue heron (Ardea herodias), yellow warbler (Dendroica petschia), mink (Mustela vison), and Western meadowlark (Sturnello neglects). Habitat surveys were conducted in 1998 and 1999 in accordance with published HEP protocols and included 55,500 feet of transects, 678 m2 plots, and 243 one-tenth-acre plots. Between 123.9 and f 0,794.4 acres were evaluated for each indicator species. Derived habitat suitability indices were multiplied by corresponding cover-type acreages to determine the number of habitat units for each species. The total habitat units credited to BPA for the Iskuulpa Watershed Project and its seven indicator species is 4,567.8 habitat units. Factors limiting habitat suitability are related to the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of past livestock grazing, road construction, and timber harvest, which have simplified the structure, composition, and diversity of native plant communities. Alternatives for protecting and improving habitat suitability include exclusion of livestock grazing or implementation of restoration grazing schemes, road de-commissioning, reforestation, large woody debris additions to floodplains, control of competing and unwanted vegetation, reestablishing displaced or reduced native vegetation species, and the allowance of normative processes such as fire occurrence. Implementation of these alternatives could generate an estimated minimum of 393 enhancement credits in 10 years. Longer-term benefits of protection and enhancement activities include increases in native species diversity and structural complexity in all cover types. While such benefits are not readily recognized by HEP models and reflected in the number of habitat units generated, they also provide dual benefits for fisheries resources. Implementation of the alternatives will require long-term commitments from managers to increase probabilities of success and meet the goals and objectives of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Program.

Quaempts, Eric

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Wildlife Protection, Mitigation, and Enhancement Planning Phase II, Dworshak Reservoir, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 directed that measures be implemented to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife to the extent affected by development and operation of hydropower projects on the Columbia River System. This Act created the Northwest Power Planning Council, which in turn developed the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. This program established a four-part process: wildlife mitigation status reports; wildlife impact assessments; wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement plans; and implementation of protection, mitigation, and enhancement projects. This mitigation plan for the Dworshak Reservoir Hydroelectric Facility was developed to fulfill requirements of Sections 1003(b)(2) and (3) of the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Specific objectives of wildlife protection, mitigation, and enhancement planning for Dworshak Reservoir included: quantify net impacts to target wildlife species affected by hydroelectric development and operation of Dworshak Dam and Reservoir; develop protection, mitigation, and enhancement goals and objectives for the target wildlife species; recommend protection, mitigation, and enhancement actions for the target wildlife species; and coordination of project activities. 46 refs., 4 figs., 31 tabs.

Hansen, H. Jerome; Martin, Robert C.

1989-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

Bonneville Power Administration Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan Final EIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 SAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS, RESEARCH MONITORING AND EVALUATION, AND POLICY AND PLANNING Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan EIS Volume 3: Sample Implementation Actions, Research Monitoring and Evaluation, and Policy and Planning Volume 3/ 1 VOLUME 3 SAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS, RESEARCH MONITORING AND EVALUATION, AND POLICY AND PLANNING One of the major challenges within the Region has been understanding the interrelationships among the numerous proposed fish and wildlife mitigation and recovery actions. One reason for this difficulty is that these actions are derived from many different regional proposals, each of which has been designed to meet a specific goal. In addition, the lack of an effective tool to illustrate these interrelationships has hampered understanding.

425

NREL: Wind-Wildlife Impacts Literature Database (WILD) Home Page  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wind-Wildlife Impacts Literature Database (WILD) Wind Research WILD WILD Wind-Wildlife Impacts Literature Database (WILD) Wind Research WILD WILD Browse By Reset All Geography Africa (11) Apply Africa filter Asia (12) Apply Asia filter Australia and Oceania (10) Apply Australia and Oceania filter Europe (219) Apply Europe filter Global (7) Apply Global filter North America (217) Apply North America filter Technology Land-Based Wind (280) Apply Land-Based Wind filter Marine Energy (58) Apply Marine Energy filter Offshore Wind (161) Apply Offshore Wind filter Power Lines (66) Apply Power Lines filter Towers (23) Apply Towers filter Animal Birds (334) Apply Birds filter Fish (71) Apply Fish filter Invertebrates (44) Apply Invertebrates filter Mammals (185) Apply Mammals filter Reptiles (10) Apply Reptiles filter Publication Year 2013 (92) Apply 2013 filter

426

Kootenai River Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project : Long-term Bighorn Sheep/Mule Deer Winter and Spring Habitat Improvement Project : Wildlife Mitigation Project, Libby Dam, Montana : Management Plan.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Libby hydroelectric project, located on the Kootenai River in northwestern Montana, resulted in several impacts to the wildlife communities which occupied the habitats inundated by Lake Koocanusa. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, in cooperation with the other management agencies, developed an impact assessment and a wildlife and wildlife habitat mitigation plan for the Libby hydroelectric facility. In response to the mitigation plan, Bonneville Power Administration funded a cooperative project between the Kootenai National Forest and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks to develop a long-term habitat enhancement plan for the bighorn sheep and mule deer winter and spring ranges adjacent to Lake Koocanusa. The project goal is to rehabilitate 3372 acres of bighorn sheep and 16,321 acres of mule deer winter and spring ranges on Kootenai National Forest lands adjacent to Lake Koocanusa and to monitor and evaluate the effects of implementing this habitat enhancement work. 2 refs.

Yde, Chis

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Recruitment Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IAEA Recruitment Services Personal History Form (PHF) and Job Opportunities IAEA Employment Benefits Relevant Publications and Brochures Interview Process This service is provided...

428

Service Buildings  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Service Service Characteristics by Activity... Service Service buildings are those in which some type of service is provided, other than food service or retail sales of goods. Basic Characteristics [ See also: Equipment | Activity Subcategories | Energy Use ] Service Buildings... Most service buildings were small, with almost ninety percent between 1,001 and 10,000 square feet. Tables: Buildings and Size Data by Basic Characteristics Establishment, Employment, and Age Data by Characteristics Number of Service Buildings by Predominant Building Size Category Figure showing number of service buildings by size. If you need assistance viewing this page, please contact 202-586-8800. Equipment Table: Buildings, Size, and Age Data by Equipment Types Predominant Heating Equipment Types in Service Buildings

429

Copy Service, Production Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Copy Service Copy Service Copying in color or black-and-white from hard copy or electronic files. Paper size up to 13" x 19" in a variety of stocks and colors. Larger Documents (up to 36" wide and 100" long) can be reproduced in Black & White from prints or files and can be saved in a variety of electronic format Variable Data Printing - personalized document production Tab Printing Forms CD/DVD Duplication CD/DVD direct printing Binding Collate documents, insert tab dividers, punch holes for binding Stapling documents up to 1 inch thick Spiral, adhesive and perfect binding. Hard covers also available upon request Folding & Mailing Print and apply mailing addresses and labels Machine fold documents and insert into envelopes for mailing Laminate printed items up to 35" wide.

430

Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-33)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2003 1, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-33) Ron Morinaka Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Gooderich Bayou Culvert Replacement (Hungry Horse Fisheries Mitigation Program) Project No: 1991-019-03 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 8.2 Control of Predators and Nuisance Animals - Removal or Reduction of Undesirable Wildlife Species. Location: Flathead County, Montana Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to fund a fish barrier project with Montana Fish,

431

GRR/Section 3-TX-e - Lease of Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Land | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

TX-e - Lease of Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Land TX-e - Lease of Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Land < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 3-TX-e - Lease of Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Land 03-TX-e - Lease of Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Land (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 03-TX-e - Lease of Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Land (1).pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative This flowchart illustrates the process of leasing Texas Parks & Wildlife Department (TPWD) land in Texas. The Texas General Land Office manages

432

GRR/Section 12-OR-b - Fish and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Policy | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

2-OR-b - Fish and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Policy 2-OR-b - Fish and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Policy < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 12-OR-b - Fish and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Policy 12-OR-b - Fish and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Policy (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies [[Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife]] Regulations & Policies Oregon Administrative Rules 635-415-0025 Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 12-OR-b - Fish and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Policy (1).pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative This flowchart illustrates the procedures required when a project will

433

Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-36)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 10, 2003 October 10, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-36) Joe DeHerrera- KEWN-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Logan Valley Wildlife Mitigation Project-Implemetation of Wildlife Mitigation Plan Project No: 200000900 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 2.0 Plant Propagation Techniques; 4.0 Water Development and Management; 5.0 Water Distribution Techniques; 6.0 Fire Management Techniques (prompt fire suppression and fuels management, natural fire management), 7.0 Vegetation Management (herbicide, hand pulling, prescribed burns, water level manipulation); 8.0 Species Manangement

434

Shillapoo Wildlife Area 2007 Follow-up HEP Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In April and May 2007 the Regional HEP Team (RHT) conducted a follow-up HEP analysis on the Egger (612 acres) and Herzog (210 acres) parcels located at the north end of the Shillapoo Wildlife Area. The Egger and Herzog parcels have been managed with Bonneville Power Administration funds since acquired in 1998 and 2001 respectively. Slightly more than 936 habitat units (936.47) or 1.14 HUs per acre was generated as an outcome of the 2007 follow-up HEP surveys. Results included 1.65 black-capped chickadee HUs, 280.57 great blue heron HUs, 581.45 Canada goose HUs, 40 mallard HUs, and 32.80 mink HUs. Introduction A follow-up Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) (USFWS 1980) analysis was conducted by the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority's (CBFWA) Regional HEP Team (RHT) during April and May 2007 to document changes in habitat quality and to determine the number of habitat units (HUs) to credit Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for providing operation and maintenance (O&M) funds since WDFW acquired the parcels. The 2007 follow-up HEP evaluation was limited to Shillapoo Wildlife Area (SWA) parcels purchased with Bonneville Power Administration funds. D. Budd (pers. comm.) reported WDFW purchased the 612 acre Egger Farms parcel on November 2, 1998 for $1,737,0001 and the 210 acre Herzog acquisition on June 21, 2001 for $500,000 with Memorandum of Agreement funds (BPA and WDFW 1996) as partial fulfillment of BPA's wildlife mitigation obligation for construction of Bonneville and John Day Dams (Rasmussen and Wright 1989). Anticipating the eventual acquisition of the Egger and Herzog properties, WDFW conducted HEP surveys on these lands in 1994 to determine the potential number of habitat units to be credited to BPA. As a result, HEP surveys and habitat unit calculations were completed as much as seven years prior to acquiring the sites. The term 'Shillapoo Wildlife Area' will be used to describe only the Herzog and Egger parcels in this document. Details and results of the HEP analysis are included in this report.

Ashley, Paul R.

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

The Tiger and the Sun: Solar Power Plants and Wildlife Sanctuaries  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We discuss separate and integrated approaches to building scalable solar power plants and wildlife sanctuaries. Both solar power plants and wildlife sanctuaries need a lot of land. We quantify some of the requirements using various estimates of the rate of solar power production as well as the rate of adding wildlife to a sanctuary over the time range 2010-2050. We use population dynamics equations to study the evolution of solar energy and tiger populations up to and beyond 2050.

McGuigan, Michael

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report; Precious Lands Wildlife Management Area, Technical Report 2000-2003.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) currently manages a 15,325 acre parcel of land known as the Precious Lands Wildlife Management Area that was purchased as mitigation for losses incurred by construction of the four lower Snake River dams. The Management Area is located in northern Wallowa County, Oregon and southern Asotin County, Washington (Figure 1). It is divided into three management parcels--the Buford parcel is located on Buford Creek and straddles the WA-OR state line, and the Tamarack and Basin parcels are contiguous to each other and located between the Joseph Creek and Cottonwood Creek drainages in Wallowa County, OR. The project was developed under the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-501), with funding from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). The acreage protected under this contract will be credited to BPA as habitat permanently dedicated to wildlife and wildlife mitigation. A modeling strategy known as Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) was developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and adopted by BPA as a habitat equivalency accounting system. Nine wildlife species models were used to evaluate distinct cover type features and provide a measure of habitat quality. Models measure a wide range of life requisite variables for each species and monitor overall trends in vegetation community health and diversity. One product of HEP is an evaluation of habitat quality expressed in Habitat Units (HUs). This HU accounting system is used to determine the amount of credit BPA receives for mitigation lands. After construction of the four lower Snake River dams, a HEP loss assessment was conducted to determine how many Habitat Units were inundated behind the dams. Twelve target species were used in that evaluation: Canada goose, mallard, river otter, downy woodpecker, song sparrow, yellow warbler, marsh wren, western meadowlark, chukar, ring-necked pheasant, California quail, and mule deer. The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the Washington Department of fish and Wildlife subsequently purchased numerous properties to mitigate for the identified Snake River losses. These projects, however, were not sufficient to mitigate for all the HU's lost. The Northwest Power Planning Council amended the remaining 26,774 HU's into their 1994-1995 Fish and Wildlife Program as being unmitigated (NPPC 2000), which allowed the Nez Perce Tribe to contract with BPA to provide HU's through the Precious Lands Project. The Precious Lands project contains a different composition of cover types than those assessed during the lower Snake loss assessment. For example, no mallard or Canada goose habitat exists on Precious Lands but the area does contain conifer forest, which was not present on the area inundated by dam construction. These cover type differences have resulted in a slightly different suite of species for the current HEP assessment. Target species for Precious Lands are downy woodpecker, yellow warbler, song sparrow, California Quail, mule deer, sharp-tailed grouse (brood rearing), west em meadowlark, beaver, and black-capped chickadee. This list is a reflection of the available cover types and the management objectives of the Nez Perce Tribe. For example, chukar was not used in the present assessment because it is an introduced Eurasian game bird that does not provide an accurate representation of the ecological health of the native grasslands it was supposed to represent. Initial model runs using the chukar confirmed this suspicion so the brood-rearing section of the sharp-tailed grouse model was used instead. Additionally, the beaver model was used in place of the river otter model because the otter model used in the loss assessment was not a published model, was overly simplistic, and did not provide an accurate assessment of riparian condition. The beaver model, however, provides a detailed evaluation of overstory class structure that the NPT felt was a good compliment to the yellow warbler and song sparrow models that evaluated understory shrub layers. Overall, such substituti

Kozusko, Shana

2003-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Wildlife Mitigation and Restoration for Grand Coulee Dam: Blue Creek Project, Phase 1.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report is a recommendation from the Spokane Tribe to the Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC) for partial mitigation for the extensive wildlife and wildlife habitat losses on the Spokane Indian Reservation caused by the construction of Grand Coulee Dam. NPPC`s interim wildlife goal over the next 7 years for the Columbia hydropower system, is to protect, mitigate and enhance approximately 35% basin wide of the lost habitat units. Grand Coulee Dam had the greatest habitat losses of any Dams of the Wildlife Rule.

Merker, Christopher

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

A GIS-based identification of potentially significant wildlife habitats associated with roads in Vermont  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Capen. 1997. A report on the biophysical regions in Vermont.report prepared for the Vermont Ecomapping Roundtable.scientist with the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department and

Austin, John M.; Viani, Kevin; Hammond, Forrest; Slesar, Chris

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Division of Fish and Wildlife Programs, 1984-1985 Progress Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The report describes the organization and functions of the Division of Fish and Wildlife, and lists the projects conducted during FY 1985. (ACR)

Kiilsgaard, Chris

1985-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

Great Lakes water quality initiative criteria documents for the protection of wildlife (proposed): DDT, mercury 2,3,7,8-TCDD and PCBs  

SciTech Connect

The document outlines, for each category of contaminant listed in the title, the relevant literature, the calculation of mammalian wildlife value, the calculation of Avian Wildlife Value, and the Great Lakes Wildlife criterion.

Bradbury, S.; Nolt, C.; Goodman, B.; Stromborg, K.; Sullivan, J.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.11 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter 1 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter < GRR‎ | Elements Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections 14-CA-c.11 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter The DOGGR State Board prepares an Updated Draft Project Approval Letter, reflecting the the public comments and Regional Board' proposed revisions. Logic Chain No Parents \V/ GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.11 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter (this page) \V/ No Dependents Under Development Add.png Add an Element Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.11_-_Updated_Draft_Project_Approval_Letter&oldid=539626" Categories: Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Elements Under Development What links here Related changes

442

Microsoft Word - Final Report Package Transmittal - FY 2010 FS Management Letter.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: December 20, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-322 (A10FN006) SUBJECT: Management Letter on the Audit of the Department of Energy's Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2010 TO: Chief Financial Officer, CF-1 Attached is the subject letter prepared by KPMG LLP, our contract auditors. The letter contains 23 new findings (see letter, Exhibit A) and 4 repeat findings (see letter, Exhibit B) that were issued during the course of the Fiscal Year 2010 audit of the Department of Energy's (Department) Consolidated Financial Statements. Management generally concurred with and provided planned corrective actions for most of the recommendations listed in the Management Letter and management's comments are included in each finding.

443

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: oil field or wilderness  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The second session of the 100th Congress will see continued debate over the prospect of oil and gas drilling on a 19-million-acre expanse of mountains and tundra known as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). The arctic refuge, most of which lies above the Arctic Circle, is larger than any refuges in the lower 48 states. Because of its size, the area supports a broad range of linked ecosystems. Of particular concern is the 1.5-million-acre coastal plain, which may be targeted for development. The coastal plain provides a home, at least part of the year, to Alaska's porcupine caribou. The coastal plain also supports many other forms of wildlife-including the wolf, arctic fox, brown bear, polar bear, and arctic peregrine falcon, which is listed as a threatened species. The potential effects of drilling projects extend beyond loss of wildlife; they include desecration of the land itself. Although few members of Congress deny the value of protecting the amazing variety of life on the coastal plain, some insist that limited drilling could be conducted without destroying crucial habitat. Last July, the department tentatively divided some of the targeted lands among native corporations in preparation for leasing to oil companies. In response to what was felt to be an attempt to overstep congressional authority, the House passed HR 2629, banning this kind of land deal without congressional approval. In essence, the measure reiterated congressional authority provided by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) of 1980. This act mandated the study of environmental threats and oil potential by the Department of Interior, while putting the ANWR coastal plain off-limits to development without an explicit congressional directive.

Spitler, A.

1987-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

Oil production in the Arctic Natl. Wildlife Refuge  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This assessment responds to U.S. House and Senate committee requests for an examination of technical issues concerning potential development of the Arctic Natl. Wildlife Refuge (ANWAR) in northeastern Alaska. The illustrated report presents the results of an assessment of oilfield technology used to develop the Alaskan North Slope, as an analog for technology at ANWR. The report considers prospects for future North Slope oil production, especially the likelihood that oil flowing through the Trans Alaskan Pipeline System will decline dramatically during the next decade.

Not Available

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Letter from the Chairman of the Board of Lincoln County Commissioners...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments Concerning the Continuation or Modification of the Provisions of the Price-Anderson Act Letter from the Chairman of the Board of Lincoln County Commissioners...

446

Letters of Interest PRICE/COST Estimate Sheet for [Insert LOI...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(Typed Name) NREL Form (10-5-2000) Letters of Interest PRICECOST Estimate Sheet for Description Base Year Phase Option Year I Phase Option Year...

447

Microsoft Word - AL 2010-07 Acquistion Letters Remaining in Effect...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, andor...

448

Conceptual design letter report for project W-454, AW jumper manifold upgrade  

SciTech Connect

This Conceptual Design Letter Report provides details on the activities required to be performed for this project and also provides cost estimates and schedules for those activities.

Mattichak, R.W., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

449

Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Project Abstracts; May 25-27, Portland, Oregon, 1997 Annual Review.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Abstracts are presented from the 1997 Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Review of Projects. The purpose was to provide information and education on the approximate 127 million dollars in Northwest electric ratepayer fish and wildlife mitigation projects funded annually.

Allee, Brian J. (Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority, Portland, OR)

1997-06-26T23:59:59.000Z

450

Mailing Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mailing Services Mailing Services Use the form below to add your name to the Depleted UF6 Mailing List. First Name: Last Name: Organization: Address: City: State: Postal Code:...

451

SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT 208 Appendix A: Assessment Tools  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to a maximum of about 2,000 ft (610 m) in much of northern Washington and 3,500 ft (1,067 m) in central OregonSOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT 208 Appendix A: Assessment Tools #12;SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT A-1 Interactive

452

DRAFT SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT 208 Appendix A: Assessment Tools  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Washington and 3,500 ft (1,067 m) in central Oregon. Soils and geology are very diverse. Topography rangesDRAFT SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT 208 Appendix A: Assessment Tools #12;DRAFT SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON SUBBASIN PLANNING ECOREGION WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT A-1

453

Status Review of Wildlife Mitigation at Columbia Basin Hydroelectric Projects, Oregon Facilities, Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The report presents a review and documentation of existing information on wildlife resources at Columbia River Basin hydroelectric facilities within Oregon. Effects of hydroelectric development and operation; existing agreements; and past, current and proposed wildlife mitigation, enhancement, and protection activities were considered. (ACR)

Bedrossian, Karen L.

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Calibration Services  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... of these applications, the Optoelectronics Division provides measurement services at laser power levels from nanowatts to kilowatts and pulse ...

2012-11-28T23:59:59.000Z

455

Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-25)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 11, 2002 June 11, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-25) Ron Morinaka, KEWU-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Purchase of Fisher River Conservation Easement (Fiscal Years 2002-2004) Project No: 2002-044-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.2 Easement Acquisition Location: near Libby, Lincoln County, Montana Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund a portion of the cost of a conservation easement on 56,400 acres of land along the Fisher River to preclude development

456

Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-35)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2003 7, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-35) Joe Deherrera Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Malheur Wildlife Mitigation Project- Denny Jones Ranch Project No: 200002700 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 2.0 Plant Propagation Techniques; 4.0 Water Development and Management; 5.0 Water Distribution Techniques; 6.0 Fire Management Techniques (prompt fire suppression and fuels management, natural fire management), 7.0 Vegetation Management (herbicide, hand pulling, prescribed burns, water level manipulation); 8.2 Control of Predators and

457

EIS (DOE/EIS-0246-SA-24) Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife MitigationProgram EIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2002 3, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-24) David Sill Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Herbert Conservation Easement Project No: 1992-068-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.2 Easement Acquisition Location: Benton County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to purchase a conservation easement on approximately 221 acres of the Herbert parcel in Benton County, Oregon for the protection of wetland, riparian, and riverine habitats. The Herbert parcel is located within the Willamette

458

Letter from Pepco Holdings Regarding the Reliability of Electric...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

service for the Nation's Capital in light of the recent shutdown of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia. The plant shutdown has removed a redundancy...

459

Letter of Appreciation from DOE to Argonne Employees for their...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for their services and expertise during the nuclear situation at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan. Sal Golub, deputy assistant secretary for Nuclear Reactor...

460

Biometric Web Services  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Biometric Web Services. The biometric web services project combines biometrics and web services to. ... What are Web services? ...

2012-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "wildlife services letter" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Shillapoo Wildlife Area, Annual Report 2004-2005.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes accomplishments, challenges and successes on WDFW's Shillapoo Wildlife Area funded under Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) Wildlife Mitigation Program (BPA project No.2003-012-00) during the Fiscal Year 05 contract period October 1, 2004-September 30, 2005. The information presented here is intended to supplement that contained in BPA's PISCES contract development and reporting system. The organization below is by broad categories of work but references are made to individual work elements in the PISCES Statement of Work as appropriate. The greatest success realized during this contract period was completion of the water system that will provide water to wetland basins within the Vancouver Lake Unit and three independent basins on adjoining Clark County owned lands. The water system paid for by Clark Public Utilities was designed and built under the direction of Ducks Unlimited. Having a reliable water supply for these areas has allowed us for the first time to begin making significant progress toward our wetland vegetation management goals on this unit. A reduction in the density of reed canary grass has already been noted and increased levels of native plant occurrence have been observed. Our most notable setback was an increase in the infestation of purple loosestrife within a portion of the Shillapoo Lakebed including parts of the North and South Units. A great deal of effort and time was spent on addressing the problem including hand cutting and spraying individual plants.

Calkins, Brian

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Appendix F: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Section 7 Consultation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

bat, Myotis Sodalis." Journal of Mammalogy 58(1): 2. Cope, J.B.; Richter, A.R.; and Mills, R.S. 1974. "A Summer Concentration of the Indiana Bat, Myotis sodalis in Wayne...

463

US Fish and Wildlife Service biomonitoring operations manual, Appendices A--K  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Volume 2 contains Appendices and Summary Sheets for the following areas: A-Legislative Background and Key to Relevant Legislation, B- Biomonitoring Operations Workbook, C-Air Monitoring, D-Introduction to the Flora and Fauna for Biomonitoring, E-Decontamination Guidance Reference Field Methods, F-Documentation Guidance, Sample Handling, and Quality Assurance/Quality Control Standard Operating Procedures, G-Field Instrument Measurements Reference Field Methods, H-Ground Water Sampling Reference Field Methods, I-Sediment Sampling Reference Field Methods, J-Soil Sampling Reference Field Methods, K-Surface Water Reference Field Methods. Appendix B explains how to set up strategy to enter information on the ``disk workbook``. Appendix B is enhanced by DE97006389, an on-line workbook for users to be able to make revisions to their own biomonitoring data.

Gianotto, D.F.; Rope, R.C.; Mondecar, M.; Breckenridge, R.P.; Wiersma, G.B.; Staley, C.S.; Moser, R.S.; Sherwood, R.; Brown, K.W.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix G: Responses to U.S. Department of Energy Letters to State Agencies and Native American Groups  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS RESPONSES TO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LETTERS TO STATE AGENCIES AND NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS Consultation Letters G-32 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-33 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-34 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-35 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-36 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-37 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-38 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-39 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-40 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-41 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-42 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters

465

Public resource allocation for programs aimed at managing woody plants on the Edwards Plateau: water yield, wildlife habitat, and carbon sequestration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Edwards Plateau is the drainage area for the Edwards Aquifer, which provides water to over 2.2 million people. The plateau also provides other ecosystem services, such as wildlife habitat and the sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The public concern for continued delivery of these ecosystem services is increasing; with private landowners of the plateau region affecting the delivery of these services. A geographic information systems spatial analysis was conducted for Bandera and Kerr counties, with two components being: (1) biophysical and (2) landowner interest. Together these resulted in an overarching map depicting the optimal locations to allocate government assistance to landowners for managing their property to support three ecosystem services: water yield, wildlife habitat, and carbon sequestration.In April 2003, a mail survey of selected landowners was conducted to determine their opinions regarding ecosystem services and cost-share programs (Olenick et al. 2005). In July 2004, a supplemental survey of respondents to the first survey was conducted to follow-up on a few questions answered incorrectly and to focus on landowner opinions regarding cost-share assistance programs and land management activities. Overall, it appeared that five year performance contracts were the most chosen contract type for respondents of all property sizes, earning mid/high annual incomes, and for all length of ownership time periods. Based on our findings, the publicly-funded assistance programs that should be allocated to the optimal ecosystem service locations are five and ten year performance contracts based on property size, length of ownership, and income level categories. The spatial and statistical analysis results were successful, in that optimal locations and types of cost share programs were identified for each ecosystem service in order to prioritize the allocation of limited public resources. The patches of ecosystem target areas within the final target area map can be used as land management demonstration sites to reveal to surrounding landowners the benefits of participating in publicly funded cost-share assistance programs. However, the study has been limited by the generality of the GIS statewide wildlife data.

Davis, Amber Marie

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RE Docket No. EO-05-01 RE Docket No. EO-05-01 Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public Service Commission RE Docket No. EO-05-01 Docket No. EO-05-01. PEPCO has informed DOE that the first new 230 kV line is expected to be completed by June 2, 2007. The outage for the second new 230 kV line is expected to begin immediately following completion of the first line and is scheduled to last six days. Thus, both of the new lines should be complete by July 1,2007, the expiration date of the DOE Order. As DOE stated in Order No. 202-05-3, and reiterated in Order No. 202-07- 2, "once completed, [the new 230 kV transmission lines] apparently would provide a high level of electric reliability in the Cenlral D.C. area, even in the absence of production from the Plant." Therefore, the Department's

467

Production Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Welcome Welcome The Production Services site contains links to each of the division's groups with descriptions of their services. Our goal is to update this website frequently to reflect ongoing service upgrades which, by planning and design, are added so that we can continue to meet your needs in a constantly changing work environment. Note: The Graphic Design Studio has been relocated to the second floor in the north wing of the Research Support Building 400. The telephone number remains the same, X7288. If you have any questions, please call supervisor, Rick Backofen, X6183. Photography Photography services are available at no charge to BNL and Guest users. See a list of the complete range of photography services available. Video Video services are available at no charge to BNL and Guest users. See a list of the complete range of video services available.

468

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2011-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-01 1-01 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2011-01 October 24, 2011 Issued to Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC, related to a Worker Injury that occurred during Tree Cutting Operations at the Brookhaven National Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated a worker injury that occurred at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) on March 3, 2011, when a BNL building and grounds utility worker was cutting a tree with a chainsaw while elevated 20 feet above ground in an aerial lift. An approximately eight foot long, 18-inch diameter, 520-pound section of tree trunk fell unexpectedly toward the worker and compressed the worker's right arm against the top railing of the aerial lift basket. The worker underwent surgery for the injuries, was hospitalized for more

469

Enforcement Letter-Oakland-05/28/1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1997 1997 Dr. Charles V. Shank [ ] University of California Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 Subject: Noncompliance Report NTS-SAN-LBL-EHS-1997-0001 Dear Dr. Shank: This letter addresses the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's (LBNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835. This potential noncompliance involved the dismissal of the site As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Committee in January 1996. This action was contrary to the commitments made in the Lawrence Berkeley Radiation Protection Program (RPP). The matter was initially reported to DOE in an anonymous complaint to the Oakland Operations Office and was placed into the Noncompliance Tracking System by LBNL on March 24,1997.

470

Letter Report: INS-L-09-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wasi-lington, DC 20585 Wasi-lington, DC 20585 M E . h ~ l O ~ W ~ h ~ FC)XX. 'Hr.I&;<4.CTwpEf UTY SECRETARY S IJX33ECIT: IXFBWMAJllj: Letter Report on 1nspecti.on of "Depament of Ex~ergy ~itivities hvolving the 'President's Surveillance Program" (INS-L-09-01, in spec ti ax^ No. SOSHSO12) 'X'he Foreign Intelligeiice Su~-%leilBanc,x Act of 1978 (Act), ameridetl on July 10, 2008, requireti Lktt Intelligence Community Inspectors Generd retriew specified aspects c 9 f their respective agencies' parti.cipati.on in the President's Surveillance Program. The Act defined the Program as "the inteBllgen.ce activity inarolving :comuralcations that was authorized by the I>resider~t during the period beginniilg on September 1 I, 2001, w.d endirrg on Jmuay 17, 2007.9' The Depmx~eni

471

Microsoft Word - Kucman Intervention Letter Sept 17 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17, 2013 17, 2013 Electronic Filing Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov RE: Petition by Mr. Taras Kucman to intervene in the matter of Northern Pass Transmission LLC's Amended Presidential Permit Application (PP-371) Submitted July 1, 2013. Dear Mr. Lawrence: Please find enclosed my petition to intervene in this matter. I hereby certify that I served copies of this letter and the enclosed petition by Overnight Federal Express today to each of the following: Anne Bartosewicz Mary Anne Sullivan Northeast Utilities Hogan Lovells, LLP 107 Selden Street 555 13 th Street, NW Berlin, CT 07037 Washington, DC 20004

472

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2012-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-01 2-01 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2012-01 February 28, 2012 Issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, related to a positive Unreviewed Safety Question involving the Tank Farm Waste Transfer System at the Hanford Site The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated a positive Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) identified by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) involving a discrepancy in the Tank Farm waste transfer system design temperature, unanalyzed freezing during active waste transfer, and unanalyzed potential failure of relief valves due to solids precipitation. WRPS concluded that the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (AS ME) code B31.3 analysis of the safety significant waste transfer piping for

473

Audit Letter Report: INS-L-07-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy memorandum DATE February 2, 2007 REPLY TO A T ~ N O F IG-40 SUBJECT: Letter Report on "Alleged Loss or Theft of Personally Identifiable Infonnation at Pantex," INS-L-07-05 (S06IS037) TO. Manager, Pailtex Site Office This is to advise you of the results of an Office of Inspector General (OIG) inspection of an alleged loss or theft of personally identifiable information at the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA's) Pantex Plant. BACKGROUND Under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as amended by the Immigration and Nationality Act, all United States (U.S.) employers are required to obtain and retain information concerning each employee's eligibility to work in the U.S. The information to be collected generally consists of the employee's social security number, address, date of

474

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 17, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 17, January 17, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 17, 1997 January 17, 1997 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Los Alamos National Laboratory On December 4, 1996, the referenced potential noncompliance was reported to DOE by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The report describes an assessment conducted by LANL after a determination was made that at least nine employees at Building TA-55 had not received radiological worker training in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835. The issue was initially raised by DOE/LAAO and the facility Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) coordinator conducted a preliminary review. Based on that assessment, the coordinator decided to report the

475

MULTIPLE LETTERS Mr. James Speir, Vice President Phosphate Operations  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

52. 52. APR 9 1986 MULTIPLE LETTERS Mr. James Speir, Vice President Phosphate Operations International Minerals and Chemical Corporation P.O. Box 7047 Lakeland, Florida 33807 Dear Mr. Speir: The Department of Energy is evaluating the radiological condition of sites that were utilized by the Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) during the early years of nuclear energy development to determine whether they need remedial action and whether the Department has authority to perform such action. As you may be aware through previous correspondence, the International Minerals and Chemical Corporation facility in Mulberry, Florida, was identified as one such site, as a result of some research, development, and pilot plant work conducted at the

476

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-03 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-03 October 24, 2011 Issued to EnergySolutions, LLC related to a Radiological Contamination Event at the Separations Process Research Unit at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight conducted an evaluation of the radiological contamination event at the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) Building H2 Tank Farm Weather Enclosure located at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in Niskayuna, New York. On February 17, 2011, URS Washington Group International, Inc. (URS), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prime contractor, reported an assessment of this event in the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System report EM---WGI-G2H2-2011-0001, Higher Than Expected Contamination Levels Inside H2 Tank Farm Weather Enclosure.

477

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/06/1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 1995 6, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL--WHC-PUREX-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: Mr. Ronald J. Bliss [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-04 Richland, WA 99350 Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility Gentlemen: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) investigation of an event that occurred between February 22-March 7, 1995, at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) at DOE's Hanford site. The event, which involved the cutting of a highly contaminated canyon exhaust air sampling probe as part of waste disposal activities without adequate management controls, resulted in your decision to

478

Letter, September 21, 1998, Preliminary Notice of Violation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1998 1, 1998 Mr. Richard B. Wilkerson President and General Manager MK-Ferguson of Oak Ridge Company P.O. Box 2011 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 EA 98-08 Subject: Preliminary Notice of Violation NTS-ORO--MKFO-X 1 OCONSTRM-1997 -0001 Dear Mr. Wilkerson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances associated with deficiencies in the administration of the MK-Ferguson of Oak Ridge Company (MK-F) bioassay program, during the time period between 1996- 1997 when it was a subcontractor to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems (LMES), the integrating contractor at the Oak Ridge site. The deficiencies in the bioassay program resulted in the failure, on multiple occasions over a period of close to two years, to identify significant intakes of radioactive material by two workers. The exposures

479

Enforcement Letter-Richland-09/22/1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 1995 2, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL-WHC-BPLANT-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: D.J. Swaim [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-51 Richland, WA 99352 Dear Sirs: Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program and reported to DOE on May 24, 1995.

480

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WEL-2013-01 WEL-2013-01 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-01 May 29, 2013 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC, related to Worker Beryllium Exposure during Machining at the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Beryllium Technology Facility The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated the circumstances surrounding a work evolution performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Technical Area 3, Building 141, Beryllium Technology Facility (BTF), on July 11, 2012. The work evolution resulted in a worker exposure to beryllium in excess of the Department of Energy (DOE) action level of 0.2 micrograms per cubic meter for an 8-hour, time-weighted average. Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), which manages and operates LANL under a contract with the National