Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Washington TRU Solutions Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

managing and operating contractor for the United States Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. References Washington TRU Solutions, Inc.1 LinkedIn...

2

DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP January 18, 2005 -...

3

Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies associated with the Super High-Efficiency Neutron Counter Non-Destructive Assay System Refurbishment at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-CBFO-WIPP-WIPP-2006-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation/causal analysis and discussion with you and other site personnel during an informal conference held on August 1, 2006. Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions -September 8, 2006

4

DOE Cites Washington TRU Solutions for Nuclear Safety Violations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington TRU Solutions for Nuclear Safety Violations Washington TRU Solutions for Nuclear Safety Violations DOE Cites Washington TRU Solutions for Nuclear Safety Violations December 22, 2005 - 4:53pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Department of Energy (DOE) today notified Washington TRU Solutions (WTS) that it will fine the company $192,500 for violations of the department's nuclear safety requirements. The Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) issued today cites a number of deficiencies that led to a series of low-level plutonium uptakes by workers at a WTS mobile facility (MOVER) stationed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in Livermore, Calif. The violations reflected WTS' limited understanding of the design and operational limitations of the MOVER facility, a portable waste processing facility designed to be

5

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington TRU Solutions, LLC - EA-2004-08  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU Solutions, LLC - TRU Solutions, LLC - EA-2004-08 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington TRU Solutions, LLC - EA-2004-08 August 30, 2004 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC, related to the Transportainer Procurement and Fabrication Deficiencies at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Department of Energy's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) initiated an investigation of the issues with a full review of relevant documentation. In addition, discussions that involved Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office (DOE-CBFO) and Washington TRU Solutions, LLC (WTS) personnel took place in Carlsbad on May 11-12, 2004. Our findings were provided to you in an Investigation Summary Report dated June 25, 2004. An Enforcement Conference was held with you and members of your staff on July

6

DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP January 18, 2005 - 9:55am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that it has decided to exercise the five year option in the Washington TRU Solutions LLC ("WTS") contract to continue managing and operating the Department's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located in New Mexico. The option DOE exercised is a part of the WIPP contract that was competitively procured in 2000. The WTS contract will now run through September 30, 2010 with an estimated value over the five year timeframe of approximately $704 million. "We are very pleased to take this step," said Kyle McSlarrow, Deputy

7

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington TRU Solutions, LLC - EA-2005-08  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5-08 5-08 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington TRU Solutions, LLC - EA-2005-08 December 22, 2005 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC, related to Radiological Uptakes at the Mobile Visual Examination and Repackaging Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement's (OE) investigation of the Mobile Visual Examination and Repackaging Facility (MOVER) radiological uptakes that occurred from April to August 2004 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). An investigation summary report was issued to you on September 24, 2005. An Enforcement Conference was held on October 26, 2005, in Germantown, Maryland, with you and members of your staff to discuss the

8

EA-2005-08; Proposed Civil Penalty of $192,500 issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Mr. Richard D. Raaz President and General Manager Washington TRU Solutions, LLC P.O. Box 2078 Carlsbad, NM 88221-2078 EA-2005-08 Subject: Preliminary Notice of Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty - $192,500 Dear Mr. Raaz: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement's (OE) investigation of the Mobile Visual Examination and Repackaging Facility (MOVER) radiological uptakes that occurred from April to August 2004 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). An investigation summary report was issued to you on September 24, 2005. An Enforcement Conference was held on October 26, 2005, in Germantown, Maryland, with you and members of your staff to discuss the findings in the investigation report. An Enforcement Conference Summary

9

Westinghouse TRU Solutions Launches New Web Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TRU Solutions LLC Launches New Web Site TRU Solutions LLC Launches New Web Site CARLSBAD, N.M., February 2, 2001 - Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) today launched its new Web site. WTS is the new management and operating contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The Web site, www.trusolutionsnm.com, is designed to provide up-to-date information about WTS and establish a mechanism for receiving feedback. "We want to make the transition to the new company as smooth as possible," said Hank Herrera, WTS President and General Manager. "The Web site enables us to effectively communicate the WTS role, objectives, and challenges to employees, clients, elected officials, and other stakeholders." The Web site contains sections about the formation of TRU Solutions, the new

10

TRU Solutions Announces $20,500 in Scholarships For Eddy and Lea County Students  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Sherry Reese Sherry Reese Public Outreach (505) 234-7592 http://www.wipp.ws Waste Isolation Pilot Plant P.O. Box 2078 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 TRU Solutions News For Immediate Release TRU Solutions Announces $20,500 in Scholarships For Eddy and Lea County Students CARLSBAD, N.M., February 18, 2003 - Steve Warren, Washington TRU Solutions (WTS) General Manager, has announced up to $20,500 in scholarships for Eddy and Lea County students in 2003. Applications are available now from area high school and college counselors. WTS, formerly Westinghouse TRU Solutions, will award the scholarships this spring in conjunction with area high schools, the Carlsbad Foundation and several non-profit organizations. Scholarships are available in any of the following three areas of study at an accredited

11

Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Earns Small Business Program Award  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

For Immediate Release For Immediate Release Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Earns Small Business Program Award CARLSBAD, N.M., July 10, 2001 - Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) was recognized recently by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) with the Outstanding HUBZone Business Achievement Award. WTS was selected for the award by DOE's Secretarial Small Business Program "This award is a reflection of our commitment to DOE's Small Business Program to provide opportunities for small business concerns," said John Lee, WTS General Manager. "I am proud of the work our procurement group does in this regard." WTS was selected to receive the HUBZone Business Achievement Award based on the amount of money the company spent and the percentage of purchases it made in

12

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington River Protection Solutions Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 September 2010 Participation in the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), participated in the review of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review for 2010. The review was conducted during the period of August 23 to September 2, 2010, and focused on six functional areas: corrective action management, work planning and control, radiological protection, environmental protection, emergency preparedness, and

13

Washington TRU Solutions - Job Safety/Hazard Analysis Booklet  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

participation is important to efficient, safe, and increased productivity. Through the process of Job Safety Analysis, these benefits are fully realized. Job Safety Analysis can...

14

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at...

15

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

16

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

17

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solutions, Solutions, LLC - October 2011 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - October 2011 October 2011 Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations [HIAR-ORP-2011-10-26] Staff from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), in coordination with the Office of River Protection (ORP), reviewed the status and programmatic health of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) industrial hygiene program relative to the Hanford Concerns Council (HCC) Independent Review Panel (IRP) report on Chemical Vapors Industrial

18

Opening the Doors at WIPP to RH TRU Waste  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On October 16, 2006, the Governor of New Mexico and Secretary of the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) jointly approved a hazardous waste permit modification allowing the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to manage, store, and dispose of remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) mixed waste. RH TRU mixed waste is TRU waste that requires shielding for safe handling. Accordingly, some equipment and operations that are used to handle contact-handled (CH) TRU waste were not adequate to safely handle the RH TRU waste. Changes were needed at WIPP to accommodate the expanded waste envelope. To evaluate facility readiness to handle RH TRU waste, the Department of Energy (DOE) headquarters performed an operational readiness review (ORR). But even before the DOE planned the ORR, Washington TRU Solutions (WTS), the Managing and Operating Contractor (MOC) for the WIPP, performed its own Line Management Assessment (LMA) and Contractor ORR. Upon successful completion of the RH LMA, line management affirmed to the WTS general manager that they were ready to proceed with the Contractor ORR. A team of independent subject matter experts from around the nation gathered to formally assess whether the MOC was indeed ready to receive, manage, store, and dispose of RH TRU waste at the WIPP. The Contractor ORR evaluated in detail, seven guiding principles set forth in DOE Order for Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities considering the DOE Standard for Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews. Through DOE Headquarters, the DOE gathered its own team of subject matter experts to assess the WIPP's readiness for RH TRU waste operations. Upon completion of the DOE RH ORR the DOE Team reported back to Headquarters and made the recommendation that WIPP proceed with RH TRU waste operations. (author)

Kehrman, R.F.; Most, W.A. [Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services, Carlsbad, New Mexico (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 May 27, 2011 Consent Order issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC related to deficiencies in the corrective action management program, radiation control program, and sealed radioactive source accountability and control program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has completed its investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with identified deficiencies in the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) corrective action management program, radiation control program, and sealed radioactive source accountability and control program. DOE views these programs as

20

Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington Washington , DC 20585 September 20, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY AND PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM : SUBJECT: PAULBOSCO~~ - SENIOR PROCUhM~ OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOSEPH F. WADDELL SENIOR PROCUREMENT NNSA OFFICE OF ACQ SITION MANAGEMENT Acquisition Savings Reporting Template Guidance The Department is continuing to make progress in its efforts to support the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acquisition Savings Initiative, as well as the Department's Strategic Sourcing Program. After using our current reporting template for the past year, it was a good time to review the process and make adjustments where necessary. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has also noted in an audit that

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

WIPP Documents - National TRU Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Label 1 Label 1 Content 1 Label 2 Content 2 Large file size alert This symbol means the document may be a large file size. National TRU Program Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report - 2012 DOE/TRU-12-3425 Effective date 10/12 The information presented in the ATWIR - 2012 serves as a current baseline of the TRU waste inventory for potential disposal at WIPP and may be considered in future Compliance Recertification Applications. The TRU Waste Inventory Profile Reports (Appendices A and B) reflect the information reported by the TRU waste sites Mobile Systems Capabilities for Transuranic Waste Characterization A comprehensive database documenting all available technologies related to mobile characterization, treatment, and repackaging of transuranic waste. Performance Demonstration Program Management Plan

22

TRU TeamWorks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

, 2004 , 2004 By the Numbers WIPP marks five-year anniversary Shipments scheduled to arrive at WIPP for the week of 4/4/04 - 4/10/04: 18 Total shipments received at WIPP: 2,456 Total volume disposed at WIPP: 19,042 m 3 FY04 Performance Metrics D E P A R T M E N T O F E N E R G Y U N I T E D S T A T ES O F A M E R I C A TeamWorks TeamWorks TRU A weekly e-newsletter for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant team For those who endured the early morning cold of March 26, 1999, to witness WIPP's first shipment, it may seem like yesterday. Yet Friday marked five years of WIPP operations. Relative newcomer to WIPP - but not to the waste management industry - CBFO Deputy Manager Lloyd Piper observed, "The transformation from a facility in "standby" mode to operational mode has been nothing short of amazing."

23

LANL sets TRU waste hauling record  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

sets TRU waste hauling record sets TRU waste hauling record LANL sets TRU waste hauling record TRU waste consists of clothing, tools, rags, debris, soil, and other items contaminated with radioactive elements, mostly plutonium. October 4, 2011 TRU waste from LANL to WIPP TRU waste from LANL to WIPP Contact Colleen Curran Communications Office (505) 664-0344 Email LOS ALAMOS, New Mexico, October 4, 2011-Los Alamos National Laboratory has set a new LANL record for the amount of transuranic (TRU) waste from past nuclearoperations shipped in a single year to the U.S. Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, NM. In fact, the Laboratory has shipped record numbers of transuranic waste each of the past three years. The Laboratory's TRU Waste Program completed 171 shipments in the past

24

Preparation of Safety Basis Documents for Transuranic (TRU) Waste Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5506-2007 5506-2007 April 2007 DOE STANDARD Preparation of Safety Basis Documents for Transuranic (TRU) Waste Facilities U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AREA-SAFT DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-5506-2007 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at Http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE-STD-5506-2007 iii Foreword This Standard provides analytical assumptions and methods, as well as hazard controls to be used when developing Safety Basis (SB) documents for transuranic (TRU) waste facilities in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Complex. It also provides supplemental technical

25

Building America Efficient Solutions for Existing Homes Case Study: Retrofit of 1915 Home, Dayton, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Built in 1915, this two-story, three-bedroom home with an unfinished Built in 1915, this two-story, three-bedroom home with an unfinished basement and 2,600 ft 2 of living space is typical of many older homes found in eastern Washington. Through the U.S. Department of Energy's Building America program, researchers from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory worked with local energy rater Energy Incentives, Inc., to assist the home owners in cost-effectively reducing their energy use by over 50%. The researchers used Energy Gauge USA simulation software to model retrofit packages and predict the most cost-effective retrofit measures within the homeowner's budget. The presence of asbestos insulation on the boiler made it more cost- effective to pursue efficiency measures that left the boiler in place to avoid the additional costs of disposal. Major energy and cost savings

26

WIPP TRU TeamWorks - Acronym List  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Compliance CAST Colorado All State Transportation, Inc. CBFO Carlsbad Field Office (DOE) CCA Compliance Certification Application CCP Central Characterization Project CH-TRU...

27

Design of a TRU Waste Repackaging System  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper addresses the work that SRTC is performing in the design, fabrication, assembly, and testing of the TRU-Waste Repackaging Module.

Fogle, R.F.

2000-07-27T23:59:59.000Z

28

Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Announces Scholarship Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Eddy and Lea counties. Eddy and Lea counties. In Eddy County, $1,000 scholarships were awarded to high school seniors Ashley Fry, Bethany Fry and Katherine Bergstrom, all of Carlsbad; Aaron Navarrete, Loving; and Trenton Guthrie, Artesia. Scholarship funds were directly managed by school officials to target the needs of students. Funds could be used toward higher math and science education degrees, community college associate degrees, technical and vocational programs, tuition, books, or room and board. Westinghouse scholarships also went to Lea County students Felix Gaytan, Jr., Eunice; Joshua Hill, Jal; Vidal Ramirez, Tatum; and Heather Maker, Lovington. Hobbs High School seniors Laura Smith and Robert Edwards shared honors, each receiving a $500 award. "These scholarships reflect the commitment our company has - and I personally

29

Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Announces Scholarship Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

directly managed by school officials to target student needs. Funds could be used toward higher math or science education degrees, community college associate degrees, technical...

30

Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC Assumes WIPP Operations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Manager of WTS. A retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral, Herrera has more than 27 years of nuclear operations and radioactive waste management experience. He spent 24 years in nuclear...

31

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

SciTech Connect

As a generator of transuranic (TRU) and TRU mixed waste destined for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the Hanford Site must ensure that its TRU waste meets the requirements of US. Department of Energy (DOE) 0 435.1, ''Radioactive Waste Management,'' and the Contact-Handled (CH) Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP-WAC). WIPP-WAC requirements are derived from the WIPP Technical Safety Requirements, WIPP Safety Analysis Report, TRUPACT-II SARP, WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, and Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 191/194 Compliance Certification Decision. The WIPP-WAC establishes the specific physical, chemical, radiological, and packaging criteria for acceptance of defense TRU waste shipments at WIPP. The WPP-WAC also requires that participating DOE TRU waste generator/treatment/storage sites produce site-specific documents, including a certification plan, that describe their program for managing TRU waste and TRU waste shipments before transferring waste to WIPP. Waste characterization activities provide much of the data upon which certification decisions are based. Waste characterization requirements for TRU waste and TRU mixed waste that contains constituents regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are established in the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Waste Analysis Plan (WAP). The Hanford Site Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) (HNF-2599) implements the applicable requirements in the WAP and includes the qualitative and quantitative criteria for making hazardous waste determinations. The Hanford Site must also ensure that its TRU waste destined for disposal at WPP meets requirements for transport in the Transuranic Package Transporter-11 (TRUPACT-11). The US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) establishes the TRUPACT-11 requirements in the Safety Analysis Report for the TRUPACT-II Shipping Package (TRUPACT-11 SARP). In addition, a TRU waste is eligible for disposal at WIPP only if it has been generated in whole or in part by one or more of the activities listed in Section 10101(3) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. DOE sites must determine that each waste stream to be disposed of at WIPP is ''defense'' TRU waste. (See also the definition of ''defense'' TRU waste.). Only CH TRU wastes meeting the requirements of the QAPjP, WIPP-WAP, WPP-WAC, and other requirements documents described above will be accepted for transportation and disposal at WIPP.

GREAGER, T.M.

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

SciTech Connect

As a generator of transuranic (TRU) and TRU mixed waste destined for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the Hanford Site must ensure that its TRU waste meets the requirements of US. Department of Energy (DOE) 0 435.1, ''Radioactive Waste Management,'' and the Contact-Handled (CH) Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP-WAC). WIPP-WAC requirements are derived from the WIPP Technical Safety Requirements, WIPP Safety Analysis Report, TRUPACT-II SARP, WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, and Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 191/194 Compliance Certification Decision. The WIPP-WAC establishes the specific physical, chemical, radiological, and packaging criteria for acceptance of defense TRU waste shipments at WIPP. The WPP-WAC also requires that participating DOE TRU waste generator/treatment/storage sites produce site-specific documents, including a certification plan, that describe their program for managing TRU waste and TRU waste shipments before transferring waste to WIPP. Waste characterization activities provide much of the data upon which certification decisions are based. Waste characterization requirements for TRU waste and TRU mixed waste that contains constituents regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are established in the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Waste Analysis Plan (WAP). The Hanford Site Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) (HNF-2599) implements the applicable requirements in the WAP and includes the qualitative and quantitative criteria for making hazardous waste determinations. The Hanford Site must also ensure that its TRU waste destined for disposal at WPP meets requirements for transport in the Transuranic Package Transporter-11 (TRUPACT-11). The US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) establishes the TRUPACT-11 requirements in the Safety Analysis Report for the TRUPACT-II Shipping Package (TRUPACT-11 SARP). In addition, a TRU waste is eligible for disposal at WIPP only if it has been generated in whole or in part by one or more of the activities listed in Section 10101(3) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. DOE sites must determine that each waste stream to be disposed of at WIPP is ''defense'' TRU waste. (See also the definition of ''defense'' TRU waste.). Only CH TRU wastes meeting the requirements of the QAPjP, WIPP-WAP, WPP-WAC, and other requirements documents described above will be accepted for transportation and disposal at WIPP.

GREAGER, T.M.

2000-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

33

Tru-Lite | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tru-Lite Tru-Lite Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Tru-Lite Name Tru-Lite Address 13695 E. Davies Place Place Centennial, Colorado Zip 80112 Sector Efficiency Product Daylighting applications Website http://www.tru-lite.com/ Coordinates 39.5887688°, -104.8291724° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.5887688,"lon":-104.8291724,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

34

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hanford Site Transuranic Waste Certification Plan establishes the programmatic framework and criteria within which the Hanford Site ensures that contract-handled TRU wastes can be certified as compliant with the WIPP WAC and TRUPACT-II SARP.

GREAGER, T.M.

1999-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

35

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hanford Site Transuranic Waste Certification Plan establishes the programmatic framework and criteria with in which the Hanford Site ensures that contract-handled TRU wastes can be certified as compliant with the WIPP WAC and TRUPACT-II SARP.

GREAGER, T.M.

1999-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

36

TruRead | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

TruRead Place Cheshire, United Kingdom Zip SK9 5AG Sector Services Product Provides integrated services for end-to-end collection and delivery of meter readings. Coordinates...

37

IPP RH-TRU Waste Study - Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of 200 millirem per hour or less; this waste can be safely handled directly by personnel. Remote-handled (RH) TRU waste has a radiation dose rate at a package surface of 200...

38

The Remote-Handled TRU Waste Program  

SciTech Connect

RH TRU Waste is radioactive waste that requires shielding in addition to that provided by the container to protect people nearby from radiation exposure. By definition, the radiation dose rate at the outer surface of the container is greater than 200 millirem per hour and less than 1,000 rem per hour. The DOE is proposing a process for the characterization of RH TRU waste planned for disposal in the WIPP. This characterization process represents a performance-driven approach that satisfies the requirements of the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for WIPP long-term performance, the transportation requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Department of Transportation, as well as the technical safety requirements of RH TRU waste handling. The transportation, management and disposal of RH TRU waste is regulated by external government agencies as well as by the DOE itself. Externally, the characterization of RH-TRU waste for disposal at the WIPP is regulated by 20.4.1.500 New Mexico Administrative Code (incorporating 40 CFR 261.13) for the hazardous constituents and 40 CFR 194.24 for the radioactive constituents. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission certifies the shipping casks and the transportation system must meet DOT regulations. Internally, the DOE evaluates the environmental impacts of RH TRU waste transportation, handling and disposal through its National Environmental Policy Act program. The operational safety is assessed in the RH TRU Waste Safety Analysis Report, to be approved by the DOE. The WIPP has prepared a modification request to the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit that includes modifications to the WIPP facility for the safe receipt and handling of RH TRU waste and the addition of an RH TRU waste analysis plan. Modifications to the facility include systems and equipment for safe handling of RHTRU containers. Two shipping casks are to be used to optimize RH TRU was te throughput: the RH-72B and the CNS 10-160B transportation casks. Additionally, a draft Notification of Proposed Change to the EPA 40 CFR 194 Certification of the WIPP has been prepared, which contains a proposal for the RH TRU characterization program for compliance with the EPA requirements.

Gist, C. S.; Plum, H. L.; Wu, C. F.; Most, W. A.; Burrington, T. P.; Spangler, L. R.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

39

RH-TRU Waste Content Codes  

SciTech Connect

The Remote-Handled Transuranic (RH-TRU) Content Codes (RH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of RH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (RH-TRAMPAC).1 The RH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the RH-TRU 72-B. This document is a catalog of RH-TRU 72-B authorized contents by site. A content code is defined by the following components: A two-letter site abbreviation that designates the physical location of the generated/stored waste (e.g., ID for Idaho National Laboratory [INL]). The site-specific letter designations for each of the sites are provided in Table 1. A three-digit code that designates the physical and chemical form of the waste (e.g., content code 317 denotes TRU Metal Waste). For RH-TRU waste to be transported in the RH-TRU 72-B, the first number of this three-digit code is 3. The second and third numbers of the three-digit code describe the physical and chemical form of the waste. Table 2 provides a brief description of each generic code. Content codes are further defined as subcodes by an alpha trailer after the three-digit code to allow segregation of wastes that differ in one or more parameter(s). For example, the alpha trailers of the subcodes ID 322A and ID 322B may be used to differentiate between waste packaging configurations. As detailed in the RH-TRAMPAC, compliance with flammable gas limits may be demonstrated through the evaluation of compliance with either a decay heat limit or flammable gas generation rate (FGGR) limit per container specified in approved content codes. As applicable, if a container meets the watt*year criteria specified by the RH-TRAMPAC, the decay heat limits based on the dose-dependent G value may be used as specified in an approved content code. If a site implements the administrative controls outlined in the RH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 2.4 of the RH-TRU Payload Appendices, the decay heat or FGGR limits based on a 10-day shipping period (rather than the standard 60-day shipping period) may be used as specified in an approved content code. Requests for new or revised content codes may be submitted to the WIPP RH-TRU Payload Engineer for review and approval, provided all RH-TRAMPAC requirements are met.

Washington TRU Solutions

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Development of a safe TRU transportation system (STRUTS) for DOE's TRU waste  

SciTech Connect

Transportation, the link between TRU waste generation and WIPP (Waste Isolation Pilot Project) and a vital link in the overall TRU waste management program, must be addressed. The program must have many facets: ensuring public and carrier acceptance, formation of a functional and current transportation data base, systems integration, maximum utilization of existing technology, and effective implementation and integration of the transport system into current and planned operational systems.

Edling, D.A.; Hopkins, D.R.; Walls, H.C.

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Retrieval and Repackaging of RH-TRU Waste - General Presentation Modular Hot Cell Technology  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Paul Murray Paul Murray Oak Ridge, TN July 29, 2009 Retrieval and Repackaging of RH-TRU Waste- GENERAL PRESENTATION MODULAR HOT CELL TECHNOLOGY AREVA FEDERAL SERVICES - OAK RIDGE, TN - GENERAL PRESENTATION OF MODULAR HOT CELL TECHNOLOGY - July 29, 2009 ADAPTING AREVA'S TECHNOLOGY AREVA Worldwide Nuclear Lifecycle Transmission & Distribution Renewable Energy AREVA US Nuclear Fuel Services Nuclear Engineering Services AREVA Federal Services, LLC. (AFS) Federal Services Major Projects * MOX-MFFF * Yucca Mountain Project * DUF6 * Plateau Remediation Contract * Washington River Closure Project * SRS Liquid Waste AREVA FEDERAL SERVICES - OAK RIDGE, TN - GENERAL PRESENTATION OF MODULAR HOT CELL TECHNOLOGY - July 29, 2009 ADAPTING AREVA'S TECHNOLOGY AFS Technology Provider

42

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2008-01-16T23:59:59.000Z

43

Tru-ly Clean - What Does It Mean?  

SciTech Connect

The evolution and genesis of the definition of transuranic waste (known as TRU) and its application to the cleanup criteria applied to soils contaminated with transuranics, specifically plutonium, has been a matter of discussion at contaminated sites in the United States and elsewhere. Cleanup decisions and the processes that led up to those decisions have varied at several plutonium contaminated sites within the United States and without the pacific region. The sites with radionuclide soil action levels include Bikini and Enewetak Atolls, Republic of the Marshall Islands; Johnston Atoll, Hawaii; the Hanford Site in Washington State; the Nevada Test Site; the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site in Colorado; the Chariot Site in north Alaska; and the Maralinga Site in Australia. The soil-action level developed for Rocky Flats by the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for plutonium is one of the higher soil-action levels approved by regulatory agencies that is considered protective for future use of land at a cleanup site. The Republic of the Marshall Islands has adopted a relatively conservative cleanup standard to accommodate the subsistence lifestyle of the islanders, while the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site has been transferred to the U.S. Department of the Interior to be used as a fish and wildlife refuge, a land use that resulted in a less conservative plutonium soil cleanup level. (authors)

Hopkins, A. [Fluor Hanford, Inc, Richland, WA (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations, October 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ORP-2011-10-26 ORP-2011-10-26 Site: Hanford (Office of River Protection) Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations Dates of Activity : 08/16-25/2011 (Field) Final Report 10/26/2011 Report Preparer: Jim Lockridge, Certified Industrial Hygienist Activity Description/Purpose: Staff from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), in coordination with the Office of River Protection (ORP), reviewed the status and programmatic health

45

DOE Completes TRU Waste Cleanup at Bettis | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU Waste Cleanup at Bettis TRU Waste Cleanup at Bettis DOE Completes TRU Waste Cleanup at Bettis September 23, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has successfully completed cleanup of all Cold War legacy transuranic (TRU) waste at the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory (BAPL) near Pittsburgh, Pa., permanently disposing of it at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). BAPL is the 20th site to be completely cleaned of legacy TRU waste. This milestone was achieved using approximately $640,000 of a $172 million investment from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to expedite legacy waste cleanup activities across the DOE complex. This summer, TRU waste cleanup was also completed at the Nuclear Radiation Development, LLC,

46

DOE Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup DOE Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup October 6, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. -The U.S. Department of Energy has successfully removed all legacy contact-handled transuranic (TRU) waste from the Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), near Chicago, Illinois. In September, all legacy TRU waste was removed from the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory (BAPL), near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Maintained by the DOE, ANL is the country's first science and engineering research national laboratory. This milestone was supported by $83,000 provided to the National Transuranic Waste Program as part of a $172 million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act investment to expedite legacy TRU waste disposal activities across the DOE complex.

47

CRAD, Radiological Controls - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Radiological Controls - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project November 2003 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Radiation Protection Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Radiological Controls - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project More Documents & Publications CRAD, Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT

48

CRAD, Training - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU ALPHA LLWT TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Training - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project November 2003 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Training Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Training - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project More Documents & Publications CRAD, Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project

49

DOE Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup DOE Achieves Second TRU Waste Cleanup October 6, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. -The U.S. Department of Energy has successfully removed all legacy contact-handled transuranic (TRU) waste from the Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), near Chicago, Illinois. In September, all legacy TRU waste was removed from the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory (BAPL), near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Maintained by the DOE, ANL is the country's first science and engineering research national laboratory. This milestone was supported by $83,000 provided to the National Transuranic Waste Program as part of a $172 million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act investment to expedite legacy TRU waste disposal activities across the DOE complex.

50

Optimizing the National TRU waste system transportation program.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The goal of the National TRU Waste Program (NTP) is to operate the system safely and cost-effectively, in compliance with applicable regulations and agreements, and at full capacity in a fully integrated mode. One of the objectives of the Department of Energy's Carlsbad Field Office (DOE/CBFO) is to complete the current Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) mission for the disposal of the nation's legacy transuranic (TRU) waste at least IO years earlier thus saving approximately %7B. The National TRU Waste Optimization Plan (1) recommends changes to accomplish this. This paper discusses the optimization of the National TRU Waste System Transportation Program.

Lott, S. A. (Sheila A.); Countiss, S. (Sue)

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Repackaging SRS Black Box TRU Waste  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Historically, large items of TRU Waste, which were too large to be packaged in drums for disposal have been packaged in various sizes of custom made plywood boxes at the Savannah River Site (SRS), for many years. These boxes were subsequently packaged into large steel ''Black Boxes'' for storage at SRS, pending availability of Characterization and Certification capability, to facilitate disposal of larger items of TRU Waste. There are approximately 107 Black Boxes in inventory at SRS, each measuring some 18' x 12' x 7', and weighing up to 45,000 lbs. These Black Boxes have been stored since the early 1980s. The project to repackage this waste into Standard Large Boxes (SLBs), Standard Waste Boxes (SWB) and Ten Drum Overpacks (TDOP), for subsequent characterization and WIPP disposal, commenced in FY04. To date, 10 Black Boxes have been repackaged, resulting in 40 SLB-2's, and 37 B25 overpack boxes, these B25's will be overpacked in SLB-2's prior to shipping to WIPP. This paper will describe experience to date from this project.

Swale, D. J.; Stone, K.A.; Milner, T. N.

2006-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

52

CRAD, Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project November 2003 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Quality Assurance Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project More Documents & Publications

53

"TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than 5,000 Cubic Meters of Nuclear Waste to WIPP "TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than 5,000 Cubic...

54

It Just Keeps Getting Better-Tru Waste Inventory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) opened on March 26, 1999, becoming the nation's first deep geologic repository for the permanent disposal of defense-generated transuranic (TRU) waste. In May 1998, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified WIPP and re-certified WIPP in March 2006. The knowledge of TRU waste inventory is fundamental to packaging, transportation, disposal strategies, resource allocation, and is also imperative when working in a regulatory framework. TRU waste inventory data are used to define the waste that will fill the WIPP repository in terms of volume, radionuclides, waste material parameters, other chemical components, and to model the impact of the waste on the performance of the WIPP over a 10,000-year evolution. The data that pertain to TRU waste is defined in the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA), as '..waste containing more that 100 nanocuries of alpha-emitting transuranic isotopes per gram of waste, with half-lives greater than 20 years..' Defining TRU waste further, the wastes are classified as either contact-handled (CH) or remote-handled (RH) TRU waste, depending on the dose rate at the surface of the waste container. CH TRU wastes are packaged with an external surface dose rate not greater than 200 milli-rem (mrem) per hour, while RH TRU wastes are packaged with an external surface dose rate of 200 mrem per hour or greater. The Los Alamos National Laboratory-Carlsbad Operations (LANL-CO) Inventory Team has developed a powerful new database, the Comprehensive Inventory Database (CID), to maintain the TRU waste inventory information. The CID is intended to replace the Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Database (TWBID), Revision 2.1, as the central inventory information repository for tracking all existing and potential (TRU) waste generated across the Department of Energy (DOE) TRU waste complex. It is also the source for information submitted for the Annual TRU Waste Inventory Reports some of which will be used in future Compliance Re-certification Applications (CRAs) for the WIPP. Currently, the DOE is preparing for the second re-certification, CRA-2009. The CID contains comprehensive TRU waste inventory that is consistent, relevant, and easily accessible to support DOE needs, not only the CRAs and performance assessments, but also waste management planning activities and other regulatory needs (e.g., National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses). The comprehensive inventory contains information obtained via inventory updates and approved acceptable knowledge (AK) characterization information to ensure inventory data integrity is maintained and the inventory is current. The TRU waste inventory is maintained in the CID under configuration management as defined in the LANL-CO Quality Assurance Program. The CID was developed using Microsoft{sup TM} Access Data Project{sup TM} (ADP) technology with a Microsoft SQL Server{sup TM} back end. The CID is user friendly, contains more fields, provides for easy upload of data, and has the capability to generate fully qualified data reports. To go along with the new database, the LANL-CO Inventory Team has developed an improved data collection/screening process and has excellent communications with the TRU waste site personnel. WIPP has now received over 6,000 shipments, emplaced over 50,000 cubic meters of CH waste, and successfully completed one re-certification. With a new robust qualified database, the CID, to maintain the inventory information, the TRU waste inventory information is continuously improving in quality, accuracy, and usability (better). (authors)

Lott, S.; Crawford, B.; McInroy, W.; Van Soest, G.; McTaggart, J.; Guerin, D. [Los Alamos National Laboratory-Carlsbad Operations, Carlsbad, NM (United States); Patterson, R. [U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad, Field Office, Carlsbad, NM (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 14, 2012 December 14, 2012 CX-009689: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009672: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Relocation of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009671: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Demolition and Disposal of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012

56

Potential VOC Deflagrations in a Vented TRU Drum  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objective of the analysis is to examine the potential for lid ejection from a vented transuranic (TRU) waste drum due to pressure buildup caused by the deflagration of hydrogen and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) inside the drum. In this analysis, the AICC pressure for a stoichiometric mixture of VOCs is calculated and then compared against the experimental peak pressure of stoichiometric combustion of propane and hexane in a combustion chamber. The experimental peak pressures of propane and hexane are about 12 percent lower than the calculated AICC pressure. Additional losses in the drum are calculated due to venting of the gases, drum bulging, waste compaction, and heat losses from the presence of waste in the drum. After accounting for these losses, the final pressures are compared to the minimum observed pressure that ejects the lid from a TRU drum. The ejection pressure of 105 psig is derived from data that was recorded for a series of tests where hydrogen-air mixtures were ignited inside sealed TRU drums. Since the calculated pressures are below the minimum lid ejection pressure, none of the VOCs and the hydrogen (up to 4 percent) mixtures present in the TRU waste drum is expected to cause lid ejection if ignited. The analysis of potential VOC deflagrations in a vented TRU drum can be applied across the DOE-Complex since TRU waste is stored in drums throughout the complex.

Mukesh, GUPTA

2005-04-07T23:59:59.000Z

57

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 13, 2012 September 13, 2012 HAMMER Celebrates 15th Anniversary: Dedicates New U.S. State Department Field Exercise Building RICHLAND, Wash. - The Volpentest HAMMER Training Center, located at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state, will mark its 15th anniversary of operations and dedicate a new Field Exercise Building for the U.S. State Department's counterterrorism efforts. September 6, 2012 Retrieval of Ninth Single-Shell Tank Complete Richland - Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) has completed the retrieval of radioactive and chemical waste from single-shell tank (SST) C-104, an underground storage tank that once held 259,000 gallons of waste left over from nuclear weapons production at Hanford. WRPS is the tank

58

Washington Update  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Energy Management Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew April 14, 2010 Providence RI Washington Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 3 Presentation Overview * EO 13514 - Strategic Sustainability Plans * DOE's approach * EISA section 432 update * Outreach Opportunities - Federal Energy Management Awards - Energy Empowers Campaign - GovEnergy Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 4 EO13514 Sustainability Plans Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 5 EO 13514 Goals In addition to GHG goals, the EO requires agencies to meet sustainability targets, including: * 30% reduction in vehicle fleet petroleum use by 2020; * 26% reduction in potable, industrial, landscaping, and agricultural water consumption by 2020;

59

Washington, DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of. Energy of. Energy Washington, DC' 26585 , The Honorable Gene Eriquez .~ City Hall I55 Deer Hill Avenue + Danbury/Connecticut 06180 .. -r. - Dear Mayor Eriquez: Secretary of Energy Hazel O!Leary has .announced a knew approach -to openness in. the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications with the public. In support of th,is initiative, we are,pleased to forward the enclosed information, related to the former Sperry Products,'.Inc. site in your jurisdiction ,that performed,work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. Th,is informatipn is provided,for your information, use, and retenti~oh. DOE's Formeily Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for. identification of sites used by'DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and,

60

Department Washington,  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington, of Energy DC 20545 Mr. Roy J. Villella, Jr. Assistant Secretary Diebold, Incorporated 818 Mulberry Road, S.E. F. 0. Box 8230 Canton, Ohio 44711-8230 Dear Mr..Villella: Enclosed is your copy of the signed consent form for the survey of those portions of the Diebold property used by the former owner, Herring Hall and Marvin Safe Company, to machine uranium rod for the Manhattan Engineer District. I have directed our contractor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to coordinate the specific time and details for the visit and survey. Mr. Woodrow Cottrell, ORNL, or his representative, will be contacting you in this regard. If you have any questions regarding the survey, please call me at (301) 353-5439. Sincerely, Andrew Wallo III, Designation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Washington Update  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Management Program Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update Dr. Timothy Unruh October 25-26, 2011 Philadelphia, PA 2 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview  Federal Government Goals and Status  FEMP Update  UESC Program Overview and Goals  Mark Your Calendar: Spring 2012 FUPWG 3 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov FEMP's Mission FEMP provides the services, tools, and expertise to Federal agencies to help them achieve their legislated and executive ordered energy, greenhouse gas, and water goals. This is delivered through project financing services, technical assistance, and communications and training. 4 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov

62

Washington Update  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew October 20, 2010 Rapid City, SD Washington Update 2 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview * FEMP Updates * GHG Guidance Update * EISA Section 432 Update * Mark Your Calendar 3 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov * Richard Kidd is leaving FEMP - Will become Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Energy and Sustainability - Skye Schell will assume the role of interim Program Manager * Jesse Feinberg (Energetics) departed over the summer to attend grad school Columbia * Sarah Mabbitt (smabbitt@energetics.com)

63

RH-TRU Waste Content Codes (RH-TRUCON)  

SciTech Connect

The Remote-Handled Transuranic (RH-TRU) Content Codes (RH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of RH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (RH-TRAMPAC).1 The RH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the RH-TRU 72-B. This document is a catalog of RH-TRU 72-B authorized contents by site. A content code is defined by the following components: A two-letter site abbreviation that designates the physical location of the generated/stored waste (e.g., ID for Idaho National Laboratory [INL]). The site-specific letter designations for each of the sites are provided in Table 1. A three-digit code that designates the physical and chemical form of the waste (e.g., content code 317 denotes TRU Metal Waste). For RH-TRU waste to be transported in the RH-TRU 72-B, the first number of this three-digit code is 3. The second and third numbers of the three-digit code describe the physical and chemical form of the waste. Table 2 provides a brief description of each generic code. Content codes are further defined as subcodes by an alpha trailer after the three-digit code to allow segregation of wastes that differ in one or more parameter(s). For example, the alpha trailers of the subcodes ID 322A and ID 322B may be used to differentiate between waste packaging configurations. As detailed in the RH-TRAMPAC, compliance with flammable gas limits may be demonstrated through the evaluation of compliance with either a decay heat limit or flammable gas generation rate (FGGR) limit per container specified in approved content codes. As applicable, if a container meets the watt*year criteria specified by the RH-TRAMPAC, the decay heat limits based on the dose-dependent G value may be used as specified in an approved content code. If a site implements the administrative controls outlined in the RH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 2.4 of the RH-TRU Payload Appendices, the decay heat or FGGR limits based on a 10-day shipping period (rather than the standard 60-day shipping period) may be used as specified in an approved content code. Requests for new or revised content codes may be submitted to the WIPP RH-TRU Payload Engineer for review and approval, provided all RH-TRAMPAC requirements are met.

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

64

RH-TRU Waste Content Codes (RH-TRUCON)  

SciTech Connect

The Remote-Handled Transuranic (RH-TRU) Content Codes (RH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of RH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (RH-TRAMPAC).1 The RH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the RH-TRU 72-B. This document is a catalog of RH-TRU 72-B authorized contents by site. A content code is defined by the following components: A two-letter site abbreviation that designates the physical location of the generated/stored waste (e.g., ID for Idaho National Laboratory [INL]). The site-specific letter designations for each of the sites are provided in Table 1. A three-digit code that designates the physical and chemical form of the waste (e.g., content code 317 denotes TRU Metal Waste). For RH-TRU waste to be transported in the RH-TRU 72-B, the first number of this three-digit code is 3. The second and third numbers of the three-digit code describe the physical and chemical form of the waste. Table 2 provides a brief description of each generic code. Content codes are further defined as subcodes by an alpha trailer after the three-digit code to allow segregation of wastes that differ in one or more parameter(s). For example, the alpha trailers of the subcodes ID 322A and ID 322B may be used to differentiate between waste packaging configurations. As detailed in the RH-TRAMPAC, compliance with flammable gas limits may be demonstrated through the evaluation of compliance with either a decay heat limit or flammable gas generation rate (FGGR) limit per container specified in approved content codes. As applicable, if a container meets the watt*year criteria specified by the RH-TRAMPAC, the decay heat limits based on the dose-dependent G value may be used as specified in an approved content code. If a site implements the administrative controls outlined in the RH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 2.4 of the RH-TRU Payload Appendices, the decay heat or FGGR limits based on a 10-day shipping period (rather than the standard 60-day shipping period) may be used as specified in an approved content code. Requests for new or revised content codes may be submitted to the WIPP RH-TRU Payload Engineer for review and approval, provided all RH-TRAMPAC requirements are met.

Washington TRU Solutions

2007-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

65

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Neil Brosee President Washington Closure Hanford, LLC 2620 Fermi Avenue Richland, Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This...

66

W-026, transuranic waste (TRU) glovebox acceptance test report  

SciTech Connect

On July 18, 1997, the Transuranic (TRU) glovebox was tested using glovebox acceptance test procedure 13021A-86. The primary focus of the glovebox acceptance test was to examine control system interlocks, display menus, alarms, and operator messages. Limited mechanical testing involving the drum ports, hoists, drum lifter, compacted drum lifter, drum tipper, transfer car, conveyors, sorting table, lidder/delidder device and the TRU empty drum compactor were also conducted. As of February 25, 1998, 10 of the 102 test exceptions that affect the TRU glovebox remain open. These items will be tracked and closed via the WRAP Master Test Exception Database. As part of Test Exception resolution/closure the responsible individual closing the Test Exception performs a retest of the affected item(s) to ensure the identified deficiency is corrected, and, or to test items not previously available to support testing. Test exceptions are provided as appendices to this report.

Leist, K.J.

1998-03-11T23:59:59.000Z

67

Radiogenic gas accumulation in TRU waste storage drums  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A field experiment was conducted over a four-year time span to determine the effect of high-activity transuranic (TRU) waste on the atmosphere within TRU waste storage drums typical of those generated in Savannah River Plant operation. Routine gas composition analyses showed that a significant amount of hydrogen can accumulate in drums that contain high alpha activity, and that flammable gas mixtures could form in such drums in spite of the radiolytic consumption of oxygen. According to this study, gas pressure accumulation does not pose a threat to the integrity of the TRU waste containers that are now being stored at the Savannah River Plant. Therefore, the 20-year storage criterion is still viable. However, the continued avoidance of a perfectly gas-tight drum seal (e.g., epoxy, metal welding) is recommended. The test drums will continue to be monitored.

Ryan, J.P.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

EM's Los Alamos TRU Waste Campaign Heads Toward Completion | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM's Los Alamos TRU Waste Campaign Heads Toward Completion EM's Los Alamos TRU Waste Campaign Heads Toward Completion EM's Los Alamos TRU Waste Campaign Heads Toward Completion November 20, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Advanced techniques allowed crews at Los Alamos National Laboratory to decontaminate large boxes of waste so it could be shipped as mixed low-level rather than transuranic waste. Advanced techniques allowed crews at Los Alamos National Laboratory to decontaminate large boxes of waste so it could be shipped as mixed low-level rather than transuranic waste. The EM program at Los Alamos National Laboratory exceeded its shipping goals in fiscal year 2013, shipping twice as much waste as it did in fiscal year 2012. The EM program at Los Alamos National Laboratory exceeded its shipping goals in fiscal year 2013, shipping twice as much waste as it did in fiscal

69

RH-TRU Waste Content Codes (RH TRUCON)  

SciTech Connect

The Remote-Handled Transuranic (RH-TRU) Content Codes (RH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of RH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (RH-TRAMPAC).1 The RH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the RH-TRU 72-B. This document is a catalog of RH-TRU 72-B authorized contents by site. A content code is defined by the following components: A two-letter site abbreviation that designates the physical location of the generated/stored waste (e.g., ID for Idaho National Laboratory [INL]). The site-specific letter designations for each of the sites are provided in Table 1. A three-digit code that designates the physical and chemical form of the waste (e.g., content code 317 denotes TRU Metal Waste). For RH-TRU waste to be transported in the RH-TRU 72-B, the first number of this three-digit code is 3. The second and third numbers of the three-digit code describe the physical and chemical form of the waste. Table 2 provides a brief description of each generic code. Content codes are further defined as subcodes by an alpha trailer after the three-digit code to allow segregation of wastes that differ in one or more parameter(s). For example, the alpha trailers of the subcodes ID 322A and ID 322B may be used to differentiate between waste packaging configurations. As detailed in the RH-TRAMPAC, compliance with flammable gas limits may be demonstrated through the evaluation of compliance with either a decay heat limit or flammable gas generation rate (FGGR) limit per container specified in approved content codes. As applicable, if a container meets the watt*year criteria specified by the RH-TRAMPAC, the decay heat limits based on the dose-dependent G value may be used as specified in an approved content code. If a site implements the administrative controls outlined in the RH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 2.4 of the RH-TRU Payload Appendices, the decay heat or FGGR limits based on a 10-day shipping period (rather than the standard 60-day shipping period) may be used as specified in an approved content code.

Washington TRU Solutions

2007-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Advanced Safeguards Approaches for New TRU Fuel Fabrication Facilities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This second report in a series of three reviews possible safeguards approaches for the new transuranic (TRU) fuel fabrication processes to be deployed at AFCF specifically, the ceramic TRU (MOX) fuel fabrication line and the metallic (pyroprocessing) line. The most common TRU fuel has been fuel composed of mixed plutonium and uranium dioxide, referred to as MOX. However, under the Advanced Fuel Cycle projects custom-made fuels with higher contents of neptunium, americium, and curium may also be produced to evaluate if these minor actinides can be effectively burned and transmuted through irradiation in the ABR. A third and final report in this series will evaluate and review the advanced safeguards approach options for the ABR. In reviewing and developing the advanced safeguards approach for the new TRU fuel fabrication processes envisioned for AFCF, the existing international (IAEA) safeguards approach at the Plutonium Fuel Production Facility (PFPF) and the conceptual approach planned for the new J-MOX facility in Japan have been considered as a starting point of reference. The pyro-metallurgical reprocessing and fuel fabrication process at EBR-II near Idaho Falls also provided insight for safeguarding the additional metallic pyroprocessing fuel fabrication line planned for AFCF.

Durst, Philip C.; Ehinger, Michael H.; Boyer, Brian; Therios, Ike; Bean, Robert; Dougan, A.; Tolk, K.

2007-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

71

TruLifesaver American Heart Association Basic Life Support Course  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

TruLifesaver American Heart Association Basic Life Support Course The Truman Institute P: 660 concepts of high-quality CPR · The American Heart Association Chain of Survival · Differences between Cost includes all instruction, materials and two year certification with the American Heart Association

Gering, Jon C.

72

Los Alamos National Laboratory accelerated tru waste workoff strategies  

SciTech Connect

During 1996, the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) developed two transuranic (TRU) waste workoff strategies that were estimated to save $270 - 340M through accelerated waste workoff and the elimination of a facility. The planning effort included a strategy to assure that LANL would have a significant quantity (3000+ drums) of TRU waste certified for shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) beginning in April of 1998, when WIPP was projected to open. One of the accelerated strategies can be completed in less than ten years through a Total Optimization of Parameters Scenario ({open_quotes}TOPS{close_quotes}). {open_quotes}TOPS{close_quotes} fully utilizes existing LANL facilities and capabilities. For this scenario, funding was estimated to be unconstrained at $23M annually to certify and ship the legacy inventory of TRU waste at LANL. With {open_quotes}TOPS{close_quotes} the inventory is worked off in about 8.5 years while shipping 5,000 drums per year at a total cost of $196M. This workoff includes retrieval from earthen cover and interim storage costs. The other scenario envisioned funding at the current level with some increase for TRUPACT II loading costs, which total $16M annually. At this funding level, LANL estimates it will require about 17 years to work off the LANL TRU legacy waste while shipping 2,500 drums per year to WIPP. The total cost will be $277M. This latter scenario decreases the time for workoff by about 19 years from previous estimates and saves an estimated $190M. In addition, the planning showed that a $70M facility for TRU waste characterization was not needed. After the first draft of the LANL strategies was written, Congress amended the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) to accelerate the opening of WIPP to November 1997. Further, the No Migration Variance requirement for the WIPP was removed. This paper discusses the LANL strategies as they were originally developed. 1 ref., 3 figs., 2 tabs.

Kosiewicz, S.T.; Triay, I.R.; Rogers, P.Z.; Christensen, D.V.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

Powder Metallurgy of Uranium Alloy Fuels for TRU-Burning Reactors Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect

Overview Fast reactors were evaluated to enable the transmutation of transuranic isotopes generated by nuclear energy systems. The motivation for this was that TRU isotopes have high radiotoxicity and relatively long half-lives, making them unattractive for disposal in a long-term geologic repository. Fast reactors provide an efficient means to utilize the energy content of the TRUs while destroying them. An enabling technology that requires research and development is the fabrication metallic fuel containing TRU isotopes using powder metallurgy methods. This project focused upon developing a powder metallurgical fabrication method to produce U-Zr-transuranic (TRU) alloys at relatively low processing temperatures (500C to 600C) using either hot extrusion or alpha-phase sintering for charecterization. Researchers quantified the fundamental aspects of both processing methods using surrogate metals to simulate the TRU elements. The process produced novel solutions to some of the issues relating to metallic fuels, such as fuel-cladding chemical interactions, fuel swelling, volatility losses during casting, and casting mold material losses. Workscope There were two primary tasks associated with this project: 1. Hot working fabrication using mechanical alloying and extrusion Design, fabricate, and assemble extrusion equipment Extrusion database on DU metal Extrusion database on U-10Zr alloys Extrusion database on U-20xx-10Zr alloys Evaluation and testing of tube sheath metals 2. Low-temperature sintering of U alloys Design, fabricate, and assemble equipment Sintering database on DU metal Sintering database on U-10Zr alloys Liquid assisted phase sintering on U-20xx-10Zr alloys Appendices Outline Appendix A contains a Fuel Cycle Research & Development (FCR&D) poster and contact presentation where TAMU made primary contributions. Appendix B contains MSNE theses and final defense presentations by David Garnetti and Grant Helmreich outlining the beginning of the materials processing setup. Also included within this section is a thesis proposal by Jeff Hausaman. Appendix C contains the public papers and presentations introduced at the 2010 American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting. Appendix AMSNE theses of David Garnetti and Grant Helmreich and proposal by Jeff Hausaman A.1 December 2009 Thesis by David Garnetti entitled Uranium Powder Production Via Hydride Formation and Alpha Phase Sintering of Uranium and Uranium-Zirconium Alloys for Advanced Nuclear Fuel Applications A.2 September 2009 Presentation by David Garnetti (same title as document in Appendix B.1) A.3 December 2010 Thesis by Grant Helmreich entitled Characterization of Alpha-Phase Sintering of Uranium and Uranium-Zirconium Alloys for Advanced Nuclear Fuel Applications A.4 October 2010 Presentation by Grant Helmreich (same title as document in Appendix B.3) A.5 Thesis Proposal by Jeffrey Hausaman entitled Hot Extrusion of Alpha Phase Uranium-Zirconium Alloys for TRU Burning Fast Reactors Appendix BExternal presentations introduced at the 2010 ANS Winter Meeting B.1 J.S. Hausaman, D.J. Garnetti, and S.M. McDeavitt, Powder Metallurgy of Alpha Phase Uranium Alloys for TRU Burning Fast Reactors, Proceedings of 2010 ANS Winter Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, November 7-10, 2010 B.2 PowerPoint Presentation Slides from C.1 B.3 G.W. Helmreich, W.J. Sames, D.J. Garnetti, and S.M. McDeavitt, Uranium Powder Production Using a Hydride-Dehydride Process, Proceedings of 2010 ANS Winter Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, November 7-10, 2010 B.4. PowerPoint Presentation Slides from C.3 B.5 Poster Presentation from C.3 Appendix CFuel cycle research and development undergraduate materials and poster presentation C.1 Poster entitled Characterization of Alpha-Phase Sintering of Uranium and Uranium-Zirconium Alloys presented at the Fuel Cycle Technologies Program Annual Meeting C.2 April 2011 Honors Undergraduate Thesis by William Sames, Research Fellow, entitled Uranium Metal Powder Production, Particle Dis

Sean M. McDeavitt

2011-04-29T23:59:59.000Z

74

RH-TRU Waste Inventory Characterization by AK and Proposed WIPP RH-TRU Waste Characterization Objectives  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) has developed draft documentation to present the proposed Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) remote-handled (RH-) transuranic (TRU) waste characterization program to its regulators, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the New Mexico Environment Department. Compliance with Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 191 and 194; the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (PL 102-579); and the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, as well as the Certificates of Compliance for the 72-B and 10-160B Casks, requires that specific waste parameter limits be imposed on DOE sites disposing of TRU waste at WIPP. The DOE-CBFO must control the sites' compliance with the limits by specifying allowable characterization methods. As with the established WIPP contact handled TRU waste characterization program, the DOE-CBFO has proposed a Remote-Handled TRU Waste Acceptance Criteria (RH-WAC) document consolidating the requirements from various regulatory drivers and proposed allowable characterization methods. These criteria are consistent with the recommendation of a recent National Academy Sciences/National Research Council to develop an RH-TRU waste characterization approach that removes current self imposed requirements that lack a legal or safety basis. As proposed in the draft RH-WAC and other preliminary documents, the DOE-CBFO RH-TRU waste characterization program proposes the use of acceptable knowledge (AK) as the primary method for obtaining required characterization information. The use of AK involves applying knowledge of the waste in light of the materials or processes used to generate the waste. Documentation, records, or processes providing information about various attributes of a waste stream, such as chemical, physical, and radiological properties, may be used as AK and may be applied to individual waste containers either independently or in conjunction with radiography, visual examination, assay, and other sampling and analytical data. RH-TRU waste cannot be shipped to WIPP on the basis of AK alone if documentation demonstrating that all of the prescribed limits in the RH-WAC are met is not available, discrepancies exist among AK source documents describing the same waste stream and the most conservative assumptions regarding those documents indicates that a limit will not be met, or all required data are not available for a given waste stream.

Most, W. A.; Kehrman, R.; Gist, C.; Biedscheid, J.; Devarakonda, J.; Whitworth, J.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

75

EIS-0305: Treating Transuranic (TRU)/Alpha Low-Level at the Oak Ridge  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

05: Treating Transuranic (TRU)/Alpha Low-Level at the Oak 05: Treating Transuranic (TRU)/Alpha Low-Level at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee EIS-0305: Treating Transuranic (TRU)/Alpha Low-Level at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee SUMMARY This EIS evaluates DOE's proposal to construct, operate, and decontaminate/decommission a Transuranic (TRU) Waste Treatment Facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The four waste types that would be treated at the proposed facility would be remote-handled TRU mixed waste sludge, liquid low-level waste associated with the sludge, contact-handled TRU/alpha low-level waste solids, and remote-handled TRU/alpha low-level waste solids. The mixed waste sludge and some of the solid waste contain metals regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and may be

76

Washington National Records Center  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington National Records Center Washington D.C. 20404 Annette Black, IM-23, 301-903-3842 Annette.Black@hq.doe.gov John E. Davenport, Director Records Management Div. IM23270CC...

77

The Road to Re-certification: WIPP TRU Waste Inventory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located near Carlsbad, New Mexico, is a deep geologic repository for the disposal of transuranic (TRU) wastes generated by atomic energy defense activities. The WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) [1] requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to submit documentation to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that demonstrates WIPP's continuing compliance with the disposal regulations in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 191 Subparts B and C, not later than five years after initial receipt of waste for disposal at the repository, and every five years thereafter until the decommissioning of the facility is completed. On May 18, 1998, after review of the Compliance Certification Application (CCA) (63 FR 27405), the EPA certified that the WIPP did comply with the final disposal regulations and criteria of 40 CFR parts 191 and 194. On March 26, 1999, the first receipt of contact-handled (CH) TRU waste was received at WIPP thus initiating the 5-year countdown to the first re-certification. Five years after the first receipt of waste at WIPP, on March 26, 2004, the DOE submitted a Compliance Re-certification Application (CRA) [2]. The CRA includes TRU waste inventory as a key factor. The TRU waste inventory defines what is expected to be emplaced in the repository; and, therefore, how the performance of the repository will be affected. Performance of the WIPP is determined via the Performance Assessment (PA), a set of complex algorithms used to model the long-term performance of the repository. The TRU waste inventory data that are important to this assessment include: 1) volumes of stored, projected and emplaced waste; 2) radionuclide activity concentrations; 3) waste material parameter densities; 4) estimates of the masses of chelating agents; 5) estimates of the oxyanions; 6) estimates of expected cement masses; and 7) estimates of the types and amounts of materials that will be used to emplace the waste. The data that are collected and maintained as the TRU waste inventory provide the waste source term used in the PA to model long-term repository performance. (authors)

Crawford, B.A.; Lott, S.A.; Sparks, L.D.; Van Soest, G.; Mclnroy, B. [Los Alamos National Laboratory -Carlsbad Operations, 115 N. Main St., Carlsbad, NM 88220 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

System to control contamination during retrieval of buried TRU waste  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

Between 1950 and 1970 the Department of Energy`s Rocky Flats Plant generated transuranic (TRU) contaminated waste, which was buried at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. This waste must now be retrieved and sent to a permanent disposal site. During retrieval the main contaminates to be controlled are compounds of plutonium and americium. Since these substances are small sized, and extremely mobile, airborne concentrations must be kept to a minimum to effectively eliminate personnel uptake during retrieval operations. This report describes an invention that relates to a system to control contamination due to TRU airborne particles and was developed consisting of an outer containment building, an inner containment area, a dust suppression system including an electrostatic contaminate capture subsystem, a contamination control system including a moisture control subsystem, a rapid monitoring subsystem, and a lifting and moving system including recovery and repackaging subsystems, and a lifting and moving system including recovery and repackaging subsystems.

Menkhaus, D.E.; Loomis, G.G.; Feldman, E.M.; Scott, D.W.; Mullen, C.K.; Meyer, L.C.

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

79

Test Plan: WIPP bin-scale CH TRU waste tests  

SciTech Connect

This WIPP Bin-Scale CH TRU Waste Test program described herein will provide relevant composition and kinetic rate data on gas generation and consumption resulting from TRU waste degradation, as impacted by synergistic interactions due to multiple degradation modes, waste form preparation, long-term repository environmental effects, engineered barrier materials, and, possibly, engineered modifications to be developed. Similar data on waste-brine leachate compositions and potentially hazardous volatile organic compounds released by the wastes will also be provided. The quantitative data output from these tests and associated technical expertise are required by the WIPP Performance Assessment (PA) program studies, and for the scientific benefit of the overall WIPP project. This Test Plan describes the necessary scientific and technical aspects, justifications, and rational for successfully initiating and conducting the WIPP Bin-Scale CH TRU Waste Test program. This Test Plan is the controlling scientific design definition and overall requirements document for this WIPP in situ test, as defined by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), scientific advisor to the US Department of Energy, WIPP Project Office (DOE/WPO). 55 refs., 16 figs., 19 tabs.

Molecke, M.A.

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

Lessons learned in TRU waste process improvement at LANL  

SciTech Connect

Typical papers that discuss lessons learned or quality improvement focus on the challenge for a production facility reaching six sigma (3.4 Defects Per Million Opportunities) from five sigma. This paper discusses lessons learned when the Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) transuranic (TRU) waste management project was challenged to establish a production system to meet the customer's expectations. The target for FY 2003 was set as two shipments of TRU waste per week leaving the site. The average for the four previous years (FY99-02) was about one shipment every two months. LANL recognized that, despite its success in 1999 as the first site to ship TRU waste to open the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), significant changes to the way business was being done were required to move to a production mode. Process improvements began in earnest in April 2002. This paper discusses several of the initiatives LANL took to achieve forty-five shipments in FY03. The paper is organized by topic into five major areas that LANL worked to get the job done.

Del Signore, J. C.; Huchton, J. (Judith); Martin, B. (Beverly); Lindahl, P. (Peter); Miller, S. (Scott); Hartwell, W. B. (Ware B.)

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2006-06-20T23:59:59.000Z

83

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

84

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2006-01-18T23:59:59.000Z

85

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2007-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

86

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

88

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2007-06-15T23:59:59.000Z

89

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2006-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

90

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

91

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-06-20T23:59:59.000Z

92

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2007-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

93

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

94

CH-TRU Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

95

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2007-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

97

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2006-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

98

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codesand corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

99

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

100

CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CH-TRU Waste Content Codes (CH-TRUCON) document describes the inventory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) CH-TRU waste within the transportation parameters specified by the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Authorized Methods for Payload Control (CH-TRAMPAC). The CH-TRAMPAC defines the allowable payload for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) and HalfPACT packagings. This document is a catalog of TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT authorized contents and a description of the methods utilized to demonstrate compliance with the CH-TRAMPAC. A summary of currently approved content codes by site is presented in Table 1. The CH-TRAMPAC describes "shipping categories" that are assigned to each payload container. Multiple shipping categories may be assigned to a single content code. A summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories is provided in Table 2, which consists of Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C. Table 2A provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for the "General Case," which reflects the assumption of a 60-day shipping period as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.4 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to be completed within an approximately 1,000-mile radius, a shorter shipping period of 20 days is applicable as described in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.5 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices. For shipments to WIPP from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, a 20-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2B provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Close-Proximity Shipments" (20-day shipping period). For shipments implementing the controls specified in the CH-TRAMPAC and Appendix 3.6 of the CH-TRU Payload Appendices, a 10-day shipping period is applicable. Table 2C provides a summary of approved content codes and corresponding shipping categories for "Controlled Shipments" (10-day shipping period).

Washington TRU Solutions LLC

2005-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU ALPHA LLWT TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project November 2003 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Safety Basis portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project More Documents & Publications CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT

102

Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU Waste Processing Center Tank Waste Processing Supernate Processing System  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU Waste Processing Center TRU Waste Processing Center ORNL TRU Waste Processing Center Tank Waste Processing Supernate (SN) Processing System Presented by Don F. Gagel Vice President and Chief Technology Officer EnergX LLC ORNL TRU Waste Processing Center 1/21/09 2 SRS Technology Transfer, ORNL SN Process Overview SN Process Facility ORNL TRU Waste Processing Center 3 Waste Concentration Using Evaporator Evaporator Concentrates Waste Vapor stream superheated and HEPA-filtered Vapor stream exhausted to main ventilation system Supernate Pump and Evaporator Discharge Pump circulate waste between selected tank and evaporator during concentration. Evaporator Discharge Pump Supernate Pump Supernate Tank Evaporator Exhaust Blower ORNL TRU Waste Processing Center 4 Tank Sampling/ Transfer To Dryer Tank

103

Hydrogen Gas Generation Model for Fuel Based Remote Handled TRU Waste Stored at INEEL  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Idaho National Environmental and Engineering Laboratory (INEEL) initiated efforts to calculate the hydrogen gas generation in remote-handled transuranic (RH-TRU) containers in order to evaluate continued storage of unvented RH-TRU containers in vaults and to identify any potential problems during retrieval and aboveground storage. A computer code is developed to calculate the hydrogen concentration in the stored RH-TRU waste drums for known configuration, waste matrix, and radionuclide inventories as a function of time.

Soli T. Khericha; Rajiv N. Bhatt; Kevin Liekhus

2003-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 9, 1995 November 9, 1995 EA-1123: Final Environmental Assessment Transfer of Normal and Low-Enriched Uranium Billets to the United Kingdom, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0212: Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0173: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Puget Power Northwest Washington Transmission Project October 1, 1995 EIS-0245: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Finding of No Significant Impact Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Final Environmental Assessment Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington

105

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 25, 1994 February 25, 1994 EA-0915: Final Environmental Assessment Waste Tank Safety Program Hanford Site, Richland, Washington January 1, 1994 EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tenaska Washington II Generation Project, Washington September 16, 1993 EIS-0119: Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington December 1, 1992 EIS-0119: Final Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1, 1992 EA-0429: Final Environmental Assessment Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 10, 1992 EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact Tank 241-c-103 Organic Vapor and Liquid Characterization and Supporting

106

IMPROVEMENTS IN HANFORD TRANSURANIC (TRU) PROGRAM UTILIZING SYSTEMS MODELING AND ANALYSES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hanford's Transuranic (TRU) Program is responsible for certifying contact-handled (CH) TRU waste and shipping the certified waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Hanford's CH TRU waste includes material that is in retrievable storage as well as above ground storage, and newly generated waste. Certifying a typical container entails retrieving and then characterizing it (Real-Time Radiography, Non-Destructive Assay, and Head Space Gas Sampling), validating records (data review and reconciliation), and designating the container for a payload. The certified payload is then shipped to WIPP. Systems modeling and analysis techniques were applied to Hanford's TRU Program to help streamline the certification process and increase shipping rates.

UYTIOCO EM

2007-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

107

Washington County- Wind Ordinance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This ordinance establishes regulations to facilitate the installation and construction of Small Wind Energy Systems in Washington County for private landowners, subject to reasonable restrictions...

108

,"Washington Natural Gas Prices"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural Gas Prices",12,"Annual",2012,"6301967" ,"Release Date:","10312013" ,"Next Release...

109

TRU waste inventory collection and work-off plans for the centralization of TRU waste characterization at INL - on your mark - get set - 9410  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) amended the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Waste Management Program: Treatment and Storage ofTransuranic Waste to centralize transuranic (TRU) waste characterization/certification from fourteen TRU waste sites. This centralization will allow for treatment, characterization and certification ofTRU waste from the fourteen sites, thirteen of which are sites with small quantities ofTRU waste, at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) prior to shipping the waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. Centralization ofthis TRU waste will avoid the cost ofbuilding treatment, characterization, certification, and shipping capabilities at each ofthe small quantity sites that currently do not have existing facilities. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) and Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) will provide centralized shipping facilities, to WIPP, for all ofthe small quantity sites. Hanford, the one large quantity site identified in the ROD, has a large number ofwaste in containers that are overpacked into larger containers which are inefficient for shipment to and disposal at WIPP. The AMWTP at the INL will reduce the volume ofmuch of the CH waste and make it much more efficient to ship and dispose of at WIPP. In addition, the INTEC has a certified remote handled (RH) TRU waste characterization/certification program at INL to disposition TRU waste from the sites identified in the ROD.

Mctaggert, Jerri Lynne [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Lott, Sheila [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Gadbury, Casey [CBFO

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

TRU waste inventory collection and work off plans for the centralization of TRU waste characterization/certification at INL - on your mark - get set - 9410  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) amended the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Waste Management Program: Treatment and Storage of Transuranic Waste to centralize transuranic (TRU) waste characterization/certification from fourteen TRU waste sites. This centralization will allow for treatment, characterization and certification ofTRU waste from the fourteen sites, thirteen of which are sites with small quantities ofTRU waste, at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) prior to shipping the waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. Centralization of this TRU waste will avoid the cost of building treatment, characterization, certification, and shipping capabilities at each of the small quantity sites that currently do not have existing facilities. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) and Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) will provide centralized shipping facilities, to WIPP, for all of the small quantity sites. Hanford, the one large quantity site identified in the ROD, has a large number of waste in containers that are overpacked into larger containers which are inefficient for shipment to and disposal at WIPP. The AMWTF at the INL will reduce the volume of much of the CH waste and make it much more efficient to ship and dispose of at WIPP. In addition, the INTEC has a certified remote handled (RH) TRU waste characterization/certification program at INL to disposition TRU waste from the sites identified in the ROD.

Mctaggert, Jerri Lynne [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Lott, Sheila A [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Gadbury, Casey [CBFO

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), 6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration to fund the portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to wildlife habitat mitigation projects to be undertaken in a cooperative effort with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Finding of No Significant Impact Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic) July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Final Environmental Assessment Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic)

112

TRU Waste Sampling Program: Volume I. Waste characterization  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume I of the TRU Waste Sampling Program report presents the waste characterization information obtained from sampling and characterizing various aged transuranic waste retrieved from storage at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The data contained in this report include the results of gas sampling and gas generation, radiographic examinations, waste visual examination results, and waste compliance with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant-Waste Acceptance Criteria (WIPP-WAC). A separate report, Volume II, contains data from the gas generation studies.

Clements, T.L. Jr.; Kudera, D.E.

1985-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire Letter from Washington Governor Gregoire providing...

114

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 1, 2012 February 1, 2012 CX-007984: Categorical Exclusion Determination Explosives Research Capability Expansion, 300 Area, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 30, 2012 CX-007955: Categorical Exclusion Determination Exe-Guard (Formerly Whitelist) Antivirus Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.2, B1.7 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 27, 2012 CX-007880: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evergreen State Solar Partnership CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar

115

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 26, 2010 July 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 26, 2010 CX-003170: Categorical Exclusion Determination Innovative Phase Change Thermal Energy Storage Solution for Baseload Power CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination

116

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 15, 2010 March 15, 2010 CX-001180: Categorical Exclusion Determination Monroe-Custer Number 1 and 2 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line Structure 16/2 Access Road Improvement and Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 12, 2010 CX-006365: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Spokane CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Spokane, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-006364: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Pasco CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Pasco, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-001182: Categorical Exclusion Determination

117

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2010 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 23, 2010 EIS-0119: Amended Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Fiber Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/21/2010 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington

118

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant TruDock crane system analysis  

SciTech Connect

The WIPP TruDock crane system located in the Waste Handling Building was identified in the WIPP Safety Analysis Report (SAR), November 1995, as a potential accident concern due to failures which could result in a dropped load. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the frequency of failure of the TruDock crane system resulting in a dropped load and subsequent loss of primary containment, i.e. drum failure. The frequency of dropped loads was estimated to be 9.81E-03/year or approximately one every 102 years (or, for the 25% contingency, 7.36E-03/year or approximately one every 136 years). The dominant accident contributor was the failure of the cable/hook assemblies, based on failure data obtained from NUREG-0612, as analyzed by PLG, Inc. The WIPP crane system undergoes a rigorous test and maintenance program, crane operation is discontinued following any abnormality, and the crane operator and load spotter are required to be trained in safe crane operation, therefore it is felt that the WIPP crane performance will exceed the data presented in NUREG-0612 and the estimated failure frequency is felt to be conservative.

Morris, B.C. [Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); Carter, M. [Westinghouse Electric Corp., Carlsbad, NM (United States). Waste Isolation Div.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

"TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of "TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than 5,000 Cubic Meters of Nuclear Waste to WIPP "TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than 5,000 Cubic Meters of Nuclear Waste to WIPP With the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding, Savannah River Site (SRS) continues to safely treat and dispose of radioactive waste created while producing materials for nuclear weapons throughout the Cold War. The DOE site in Aiken, S.C., is safely, steadily, and cost-effectively making progress to analyze, measure, and then carefully cleanup or dispose of legacy transuranic (TRU) waste remaining at SRS after the lengthy nuclear arms race. "TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than

120

Settlement Agreement on TRU Mixed Waste Storage at Nevada Test Site Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Settlement Agreement for Transuranic (TRU) Mixed Settlement Agreement for Transuranic (TRU) Mixed Waste Storage Issues at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) State Nevada Agreement Type Settlement Agreement Legal Driver(s) RCRA Scope Summary Settle the Finding of Alleged Violation (FOAV) and Order of November 1, 1990, and the FOAV of June 24, 1991, related to the TRU waste storage pad at Area 5 of the NTS Parties DOE; Nevada Department of Environmental Protection Date 6/11/1992 SCOPE * Settle the Finding of Alleged Violation (FOAV) and Order of November 1, 1990, and the FOAV of June 24, 1991, related to the TRU waste storage pad at Area 5 of the NTS. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Within 90 days of the effective date of this Agreement, DOE will provide to NDEP documentation of why the current inventory of TRU mixed waste cannot be removed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

"TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of "TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than 5,000 Cubic Meters of Nuclear Waste to WIPP "TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than 5,000 Cubic Meters of Nuclear Waste to WIPP With the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding, Savannah River Site (SRS) continues to safely treat and dispose of radioactive waste created while producing materials for nuclear weapons throughout the Cold War. The DOE site in Aiken, S.C., is safely, steadily, and cost-effectively making progress to analyze, measure, and then carefully cleanup or dispose of legacy transuranic (TRU) waste remaining at SRS after the lengthy nuclear arms race. "TRU" Success: SRS Recovery Act Prepares to Complete Shipment of More Than

122

Feasibility analysis of the use of TRUPACT-II for transport of RH-TRU waste  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The research indicated the feasibility of utilizing existing TRUPACT-II casks for transporting RH-TRU waste. This could be achieved with an off-the-shelf TRUPACT-II (without modifications). The only added feature would be a removable impact-limiting assembly, preferably made of aluminum-honeycomb to minimize mass and thermal resistance. The assembly would be required because the volume of the RH-TRU cargo is much smaller than the standard 14-drum CH-TRU cargo. The TRUPACT-II has the potential to be an economical alternative to the 72B cask or any other RH-TRU design; it is certified by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and sufficient specimens exist to allow for fast proof of concept. Potentially significant savings could be achieved by using the TRUPACT-II instead of designing, developing, and testing a separate RH-TRU cask.

Banjac, V.; Heger, A.S.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

123

Microsoft Word - DOE Exceeds TRU Waste Cleanup Goal at LANL.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Exceeds 2012 TRU Waste Cleanup Goal at DOE Exceeds 2012 TRU Waste Cleanup Goal at Los Alamos National Laboratory CARLSBAD, N.M., October 3, 2012 -The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Central Characterization Project (CCP) and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) exceeded a fiscal year 2012 goal of characterizing and shipping 800 cubic meters of transuranic (TRU) waste, fulfilling a commitment to the state of New Mexico. The 800 cubic meters goal was exceeded by more than 100 cubic meters, with the vast majority of the TRU waste characterized as defense related TRU and permanently disposed at WIPP. To accomplish this achievement, the WIPP CCP increased the amount of waste that was certified, ensuring it met all the requirements for disposal at WIPP. This resulted in the ability to

124

Washington Profile - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Washington Quick Facts. The Grand Coulee Dam on Washington's Columbia River is the largest hydroelectric power producer in the United States, with a total generating ...

125

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 17, 2009 July 17, 2009 EIS-0424: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Klickitat Hatchery Program, Klickitat and Yakima Counties, WA July 1, 2009 EA-1660: Final Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington April 21, 2009 EIS-0419: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Whistling Ridge Energy Project in Skamania County, Washington. March 12, 2009 State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire Letter from Washington Governor Gregoire providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so that Recovery Act funds can be made available. These assurances are required by Section 410 of the American Recovery and

126

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 23, 2010 November 23, 2010 CX-004464: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Area Radio Communications Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/01/2010 Location(s): Franklin County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2010 CX-004524: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington State University Building Upgrades and Resource Conservation Manager CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 19, 2010 CX-004525: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Services Corps CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Kitsap County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

127

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2011 21, 2011 CX-007750: Categorical Exclusion Determination Highlands Trail in the Longview-Cowlitz Number 1 Transmission Line Right-of-Way CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration December 16, 2011 Cows like these in Skagit County, Washington, supply the biodigester developed by Kevin Maas of Farm Power up to 70,000 gallons of manure per day. The newest Farm Power facility in Washington generates enough electricity to power 500 homes. Photo courtesy of sea_turtle. Farming Out Heat and Electricity through Biopower The newest biodigester at the Farm Power facility in Washington generates electricity from biogas created from bacteria's anaerobic digestion of cow

128

Geothermal Technologies Program: Washington  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This fact sheets provides a summary of geothermal potential, issues, and current development in Washington State. This fact sheet was developed as part of DOE's GeoPowering the West initiative, part of the Geothermal Technologies Program.

Not Available

2005-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Washington Gasoline Price Data  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington Exit Fueleconomy.gov The links below are to pages that are not part of the fueleconomy.gov. We offer these external links for your convenience in accessing additional...

130

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 8, 2000 March 8, 2000 EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington September 15, 1999 EIS-0310: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Accomplishing Expanded Civilian Nuclear Energy Research and Development and Isotope Production Missions in the United States, Including the Role of the Fast Flux Test Facility September 1, 1999 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 16, 1999 EIS-0169-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site

131

ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE HYDROGEN DATA & ACCUMULATION OF HYDROGEN IN UNVENTED TRANSURANIC (TRU) DRUMS  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document provides a response to the second action required in the approval for the Justification for Continued Operations (JCO) Assay and Shipment of Transuranic (TRU) Waste Containers in 218-W-4C. The Waste Management Project continues to make progress toward shipping certified TRU waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). As the existing inventory of TRU waste in the Central Waste Complex (CWC) storage buildings is shipped, and the uncovered inventory is removed from the trenches and prepared for shipment from the Hanford Site, the covered inventory of suspect TRU wastes must be retrieved and prepared for processing for shipment to WIPP. Accumulation of hydrogen in unvented TRU waste containers is a concern due to the possibility of explosive mixtures of hydrogen and oxygen. The frequency and consequence of these gas mixtures resulting in an explosion must be addressed. The purpose of this study is to recommend an approach and schedule for venting TRU waste containers in the low-level burial ground (LLBG) trenches in conjunction with TRU Retrieval Project activities. This study provides a detailed analysis of the expected probability of hydrogen gas accumulation in significant quantities in unvented drums. Hydrogen gas accumulation in TRU drums is presented and evaluated in the following three categories: Hydrogen concentrations less than 5 vol%; Hydrogen between 5-15 vol%; and Hydrogen concentrations above 15 vol%. This analysis is based on complex-wide experience with TRU waste drums, available experimental data, and evaluations of storage conditions. Data reviewed in this report includes experience from the Idaho National Environmental Engineering Laboratories (INEEL), Savannah River Site (SRS), Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL), Oak Ridge National Laboratories, (ORNL), Rocky Flats sites, Matrix Depletion Program and the National Transportation and Packaging Program. Based on this analysis, as well as an assessment of the probability and frequency of postulated credible accident scenarios, this study presents a plan and schedule for accomplishing necessary venting for segregated unvented TRU drums. A recommended method for venting TRU drums is proposed. Upon revision of the authorization basis document to include TRU drum venting, and successful completion of readiness activities; TRU drum venting will be implemented in the LLBG.

DAYLEY, L.

2004-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

132

TRU Waste Sampling Program: Volume II. Gas generation studies  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume II of the TRU Waste Sampling Program report contains the data generated from evaluating the adequacy of venting/filtering devices for maintaining safe hydrogen levels in plutonium contaminated waste drums. Additional studies reported in this volume include gas generation rates, selected waste form monitoring, and evaluation of hydrogen migration from sealed 90-mil rigid polyethylene drum liners containing /sup 238/Pu-contaminated wastes. All wastes used in the studies were newly-generated, and the waste drums were under controlled, experimental conditions. Studies using /sup 239/Pu-contaminated wastes were conducted at the Rocky Flats Plant. Studies using /sup 238/Pu-contaminated wastes were conducted at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Clements, T.L. Jr.; Kudera, D.E.

1985-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Washington Profile - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Nuclear Power Plants : ... Clean Cities Coalitions Western Washington (Seattle) ... Governor Chris Gregoire - Initiatives - Energy;

134

Energy Matters in Washington State  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Matters in Washington State Energy Matters in Washington State www.energy.wsu.edu/library/ November 2009 #12;905 Plum Street SE, Building 3 P.O. Box 43169 Olympia, Washington 98504-3169 Energy University Extension Energy Program. 905 Plum Street SE, Building 3, P.O. Box 43169, Olympia, Washington

Collins, Gary S.

135

Conversion of historic waste treatment process for production of an LDR and WIPP/WAC compliant TRU wasteform  

SciTech Connect

In support of the historic weapons production mission at the, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS), several liquid waste treatment processes were designed, built and operated for treatment of plutonium-contaminated aqueous waste. Most of these @ processes ultimately resulted in the production of a cemented wasteform. One of these treatment processes was the Miscellaneous Aqueous Waste Handling and Solidification Process, commonly referred to as the Bottlebox process. Due to a lack of processing demand, Bottlebox operations were curtailed in late 1989. Starting in 1992, a treatment capability for stabilization of miscellaneous, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous, plutonium-nitrate solutions was identified. This treatment was required to address potentially unsafe storage conditions for these liquids. The treatment would produce a TRU wasteform. It thus became necessary to restart the Bottlebox process, but under vastly different conditions and constraints than existed prior to its curtailment. This paper provides a description of the historical Bottlebox process and process controls; and then describes, in detail, all of the process and process control changes that were implemented to convert the treatment system such that a Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) and a Land Disposal Requirements (LDR) compliant wasteform would be produced. The rationale for imposition of LDRs on a TRU wasteform is discussed. In addition, this paper discusses the program changes implemented to meet modem criticality safety, Conduct of Operations, and Department of Energy Nuclear Facility restart requirements.

Dunn, R.P.; Wagner, R.A.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15, 2010 15, 2010 CX-001639: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transportation Demand Management on 164th S/128th SW/20th SE CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 15, 2010 CX-001821: Categorical Exclusion Determination SGL Automotive Carbon Limited Liability Company (LLC) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Moses Lake, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 31, 2010 CX-001386: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dragoon Creek Access to Bonneville Power Administration's Bell-Boundary #3 Transmission Line to Replace Existing Bridge CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B1.3 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Spokane County, Washington

137

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25, 2010 25, 2010 CX-003611: Categorical Exclusion Determination Schultz - Raver Number 3 and 4 500-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Lines Spacer Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination

138

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006064: Categorical Exclusion Determination Actions to Conserve Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006089: Categorical Exclusion Determination

139

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 9, 2010 September 9, 2010 CX-003832: Categorical Exclusion Determination Issaquah Highlands Zero Energy Affordable Housing CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1, B6.3 Date: 09/09/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 8, 2010 CX-003908: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fiscal Year 2010 Columbia Basin Fish Accords with Colville Confederated Tribes CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 8, 2010 CX-003789: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grandview-Red Mountain Number 1 Proposed Transmission Line Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington

140

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 15, 2011 February 15, 2011 CX-005262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Woodland and 148th Clearwire Wireless Communication Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 02/15/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration February 11, 2011 CX-005224: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/11/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 10, 2011 CX-005218: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/10/2011 Location(s): Renton, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 16, 2009 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Kittitas Valley Wind Project September 15, 2009 EIS-0312: Record of Decision Washington-Action Agency Estuary Habitat Memorandum of Agreement

142

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16, 2010 16, 2010 CX-003457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sidewall Coring of Single-Shell Tank 241-A-106 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.11 Date: 08/16/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office August 13, 2010 CX-004960: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boeing Research and Technology -Low-Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/13/2010 Location(s): Kent, Washington Office(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy August 12, 2010 CX-003624: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replacement of Twenty 22-L Structures on the Satsop-Aberdeen Number 2 230-kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/12/2010 Location(s): Gray's Harbor County, Washington

143

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 3, 2010 May 3, 2010 CX-002190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation Energy Efficiency Retrofits of Tribal Center CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Nisqually Reservation, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy May 3, 2010 CX-002438: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rocky Reach-Maple Valley Number-1 Transmission Line Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 30, 2010 CX-002137: Categorical Exclusion Determination Farm Power Lynden CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/30/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

144

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 13, 2010 October 13, 2010 CX-004253: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northwest Natural Devine Road Land Use Review Request CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 13, 2010 CX-004252: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Two Broken Transformers Near the Roza Dam Adult Trap Facility CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460) October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement (Appendices) Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460), Washington Comments and responses to DEIS-0456: Cushman Hydroelectric Project.

145

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2011 22, 2011 CX-006583: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along Portions of the Grand Coulee-Chief Joseph #1 and #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 22, 2011 CX-006580: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along the Grand Coulee-Okanogan #2 115-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 18, 2011 EA-1728: Draft Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 15, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site,

146

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2011 20, 2011 CX-006817: Categorical Exclusion Determination McNary-Ross No. 1 Upgrade Project, Surface Impairment Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Klickitat and Clark Counties, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 19, 2011 CX-006840: Categorical Exclusion Determination Security Barrier Relocation at the 618-11 Burial Grounds CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office September 19, 2011 CX-006839: Categorical Exclusion Determination Training Exercises and Simulations on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 16, 2011

147

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 17, 2010 December 17, 2010 CX-004835: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electric Vehicle Charging Stations City of Mill Creek CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/17/2010 Location(s): Mill Creek, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 16, 2010 CX-004691: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Kirkland, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 16, 2010 CX-004836: Categorical Exclusion Determination Marine and Hydrokinetic Technology Readiness Advancement Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Lynnwood, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

148

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010 CX-003023: Categorical Exclusion Determination Output Power Purchase Agreement with Northwest Energy Supply Cooperative - Barr-Tech, LLC Resource CX(s) Applied: B4.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Fishtrap, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2010 CX-002874: Categorical Exclusion Determination Game Farm Park Energy Efficient Replacement Lighting Project CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 30, 2010 CX-002873: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green House Gas Inventory CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 24, 2010 CX-002876: Categorical Exclusion Determination

149

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

150

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 19,2010 August 19,2010 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Neil Brosee President Washington Closure Hanford, LLC 2620 Fermi Avenue Richland, Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the employee fall that occurred at the Hanford High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) on July 1, 2009. The worker sustained serious injury to his back and broke bones in both legs. Based on an evaluation of the evidence in this matter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program, by Washington Closure Hanford, LLC (WCH) occurred. Accordingly, DOE is issuing the enclosed Preliminary Notice of

151

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 27, 1998 August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 13, 1998 EIS-0229: Notice of Availability of the Amended Record of Decision Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials August 1, 1998 EIS-0245-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1998 EIS-0189: Supplement Analysis Tank Waste Remediation System July 28, 1997 EA-1203: Final Environmental Assessment Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site,

152

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 30, 2010 September 30, 2010 CX-004092: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004074: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cascade Community Wind Mid Scale Wind Turbines CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 29, 2010 CX-004145: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Low Energy Enzyme Catalyzed Solvent for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/29/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington

153

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 7, 2011 October 7, 2011 CX-006814: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia Rural Electric Association (Columbia REA) Dayton Substation Tap Line Project CX(s) Applied: B4.12 Date: 10/07/2011 Location(s): Dayton, Columbia County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 28, 2011 CX-006957: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - Seattle Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Sandia Site Office September 26, 2011 EIS-0421: Record of Decision Big Eddy-Knight Transmission Project Wasco County, Oregon and Klickitat County, Washington September 26, 2011 CX-006843: Categorical Exclusion Determination ER52 Fire Station Warning Signals

154

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13, 2010 13, 2010 CX-003035: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B4.4, B5.1 Date: 07/13/2010 Location(s): Fox Island, Washington Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 12, 2010 CX-003628: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kittitas County Conservation Easement Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003447: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bridge and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003240: Categorical Exclusion Determination

155

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 26, 2011 July 26, 2011 Hanford Reaches Recovery Act Goal for Waste Cleanup Ahead of Schedule - Workers Shipped 1,800 Cubic Meters for Treatment and Disposal RICHLAND, Wash. - Today, the Department of Energy Hanford Site announced it reached a cleanup goal more than two months ahead of schedule at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. July 25, 2011 CX-006290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cardwell-Cowlitz 2011 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/25/2011 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2011 CX-006304: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell #3/Grand Coulee-Westside #1 Insulator Replacement and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/21/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington

156

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 18, 2009 November 18, 2009 CX-000195: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington County Pierce CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/18/2009 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 12, 2009 CX-000376: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boise White Paper Mill Carbon Capture and Sequestration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 11/12/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 4, 2009 Hydropower Upgrades to Yield Added Generation at Average Costs Less Than 4 cents per kWh - Without New Dams $30.6 million Recovery Act investment by the Department of Energy highlights the additional potential of hydro power November 2, 2009

157

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2011 2, 2011 EA-1858: Mitigation Action Plan Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project May 1, 2011 EA-1679: Preliminary Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Powerplant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington April 28, 2011 CX-005892: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia River Inter-Tidal Fish Commission Use of White Bluffs Boat Launch and Hanford Town Boat Ramp for Salmon Tagging CX(s) Applied: B3.8 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 26, 2011 CX-005891: Categorical Exclusion Determination 200 Area Tank Farm Interim Surface Barriers CX(s) Applied: B6.9 Date: 04/26/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington

158

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

United States » Washington United States » Washington Washington December 24, 2013 The concrete "core" is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Office of River Protection's (ORP) mission continues: to retrieve, treat and dispose of the 56 million gallons of radioactive and chemical waste stored in large, underground tanks. In 2013, ORP maintained steady progress toward the successful completion of its mission. December 24, 2013 Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record

159

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-002030: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Array and Charging Stations - Administration Building/Cathcart CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-002029: Categorical Exclusion Determination Engine Generator for Enumclaw Dairy Manure Digester CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-001830: Categorical Exclusion Determination YWCA Family Village at Issaquah CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King county, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

160

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 10, 2003 March 10, 2003 EIS-0330: Record of Decision Wallula-McNary Transmission Line Project and Wallula Power Project March 7, 2003 EA-1454: Finding of No Significant Impact Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and 100-N Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington March 6, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-128: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EA-1454: Final Environmental Assessment Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Washington.indd  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington Washington www.effi cientwindows.org March 2013 1. Meet the Energy Code and Look for the ENERGY STAR ® Windows must comply with your local energy code. Windows that are ENERGY STAR qualifi ed typically meet or exceed energy code requirements. To verify if specific window energy properties comply with the local code requirements, go to Step 2. 2. Look for Effi cient Properties on the NFRC Label The National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) label is needed for verifi cation of energy code compliance (www.nfrc. org). The NFRC label displays whole- window energy properties and appears on all fenestration products which are part of the ENERGY STAR program.

162

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Environmental for the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1 . 0 Summary . . 2.0 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . 3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Proposed Action 3.2 Onsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Offsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . 3.4 No Action Alternative ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Atmospheric Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Terrestrial Impacts . 5.1.3 Impacts on CERCLA Remedial Actions . 5.1.4 Construction Accidents .

163

Transuranic (TRU) Waste Repackaging at the Nevada Test Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes the activities required to modify a facility and the process of characterizing, repackaging, and preparing for shipment the Nevada Test Sites (NTS) legacy transuranic (TRU) waste in 58 oversize boxes (OSB). The waste, generated at other U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites and shipped to the NTS between 1974 and 1990, requires size-reduction for off-site shipment and disposal. The waste processing approach was tailored to reduce the volume of TRU waste by employing decontamination and non-destructive assay. As a result, the low-level waste (LLW) generated by this process was packaged, with minimal size reduction, in large sea-land containers for disposal at the NTS Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC). The remaining TRU waste was repackaged and sent to the Idaho National Laboratory Consolidation Site for additional characterization in preparation for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), near Carlsbad, New Mexico. The DOE National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office and the NTS Management and Operating (M&O) contractor, NSTec, successfully partnered to modify and upgrade an existing facility, the Visual Examination and Repackaging Building (VERB). The VERB modifications, including a new ventilation system and modified containment structure, required an approved Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis prior to project procurement and construction. Upgrade of the VERB from a radiological facility to a Hazard Category 3 Nuclear Facility required new rigor in the design and construction areas and was executed on an aggressive schedule. The facility Documented Safety Analysis required that OSBs be vented prior to introduction into the VERB. Box venting was safely completed after developing and implementing two types of custom venting systems for the heavy gauge box construction. A remotely operated punching process was used on boxes with wall thickness of up to 3.05 mm (0.120 in) to insert aluminum bronze filters and sample ports to prevent sparking during penetration. A remotely operated cold-drilling process with self-drilling, self-tapping titanium coated spark-resistant filters was used for boxes with wall thickness of up to 6.35 mm (0.25 in). The box headspace was sampled for the presence of flammable gases. To further accelerate the project schedule, an innovative treatment process was used. Several of the OSBs were re-assayed and determined to be mixed low-level waste (MLLW) which allowed treatment, followed by disposal in the Mixed Waste Disposal Unit at the NTS Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC). The MLLW boxes were certified using real-time radiography and overpacked into custom-built polyethylene-lined macroencapsulation containers. The polyethylene-lined lid was welded to the poly-lined box using automatically controlled resistance heating through embedded wiring in the lid. The work was performed under the existing Documented Safety Analysis since plastic welding is accomplished at low temperature and does not introduce the risks of other macroencapsulation processes, such as welding stainless steel containers. The macroencapsulation process for MLLW not only accelerated the schedule by reducing the number of boxes requiring size reduction, but it also resulted in significantly improved safety with as low as reasonable achievable levels of exposure to workers plus reduced cost by eliminating the need to perform repackaging in the VERB.

E.F. Di Sanza; G. Pyles; J. Ciucci; P. Arnold

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

EIS-0305: Treating Transuranic (TRU)/Alpha Low-Level at the Oak...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

waste types that would be treated at the proposed facility would be remote-handled TRU mixed waste sludge, liquid low-level waste associated with the sludge, contact-handled...

165

Transuranic (Tru) waste volume reduction operations at a plutonium facility  

SciTech Connect

Programmatic operations at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility (TA 55) involve working with various amounts of plutonium and other highly toxic, alpha-emitting materials. The spread of radiological contamination on surfaces, airborne contamination, and excursions of contaminants into the operator's breathing zone are prevented through use of a variety of gloveboxes (the glovebox, coupled with an adequate negative pressure gradient, provides primary confinement). Size-reduction operations on glovebox equipment are a common activity when a process has been discontinued and the room is being modified to support a new customer. The Actin ide Processing Group at TA-55 uses one-meter-long glass columns to process plutonium. Disposal of used columns is a challenge, since they must be size-reduced to get them out of the glovebox. The task is a high-risk operation because the glass shards that are generated can puncture the bag-out bags, leather protectors, glovebox gloves, and the worker's skin when completing the task. One of the Lessons Learned from these operations is that Laboratory management should critically evaluate each hazard and provide more effective measures to prevent personnel injury. A bag made of puncture-resistant material was one of these enhanced controls. We have investigated the effectiveness of these bags and have found that they safely and effectively permit glass objects to be reduced to small pieces with a plastic or rubber mallet; the waste can then be easily poured into a container for removal from the glove box as non-compactable transuranic (TRU) waste. This size-reduction operation reduces solid TRU waste generation by almost 2% times. Replacing one-time-use bag-out bags with multiple-use glass crushing bags also contributes to reducing generated waste. In addition, significant costs from contamination, cleanup, and preparation of incident documentation are avoided. This effort contributes to the Los Alamos National Laboratory Continuous Improvement Program by improving the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and formality of glovebox operations. In this report, the technical issues, associated with implementing this process improvement are addressed, the results discussed, effectiveness of Lessons Learned evaluated, and waste savings presented.

Cournoyer, Michael E [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Nixon, Archie E [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Dodge, Robert L [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Fife, Keith W [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Sandoval, Arnold M [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Garcia, Vincent E [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

166

Transuranic (Tru) waste volume reduction operations at a plutonium facility  

SciTech Connect

Programmatic operations at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility (TA 55) involve working with various amounts of plutonium and other highly toxic, alpha-emitting materials. The spread of radiological contamination on surfaces, airborne contamination, and excursions of contaminants into the operator's breathing zone are prevented through use of a variety of gloveboxes (the glovebox, coupled with an adequate negative pressure gradient, provides primary confinement). Size-reduction operations on glovebox equipment are a common activity when a process has been discontinued and the room is being modified to support a new customer. The Actin ide Processing Group at TA-55 uses one-meter-long glass columns to process plutonium. Disposal of used columns is a challenge, since they must be size-reduced to get them out of the glovebox. The task is a high-risk operation because the glass shards that are generated can puncture the bag-out bags, leather protectors, glovebox gloves, and the worker's skin when completing the task. One of the Lessons Learned from these operations is that Laboratory management should critically evaluate each hazard and provide more effective measures to prevent personnel injury. A bag made of puncture-resistant material was one of these enhanced controls. We have investigated the effectiveness of these bags and have found that they safely and effectively permit glass objects to be reduced to small pieces with a plastic or rubber mallet; the waste can then be easily poured into a container for removal from the glove box as non-compactable transuranic (TRU) waste. This size-reduction operation reduces solid TRU waste generation by almost 2% times. Replacing one-time-use bag-out bags with multiple-use glass crushing bags also contributes to reducing generated waste. In addition, significant costs from contamination, cleanup, and preparation of incident documentation are avoided. This effort contributes to the Los Alamos National Laboratory Continuous Improvement Program by improving the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and formality of glovebox operations. In this report, the technical issues, associated with implementing this process improvement are addressed, the results discussed, effectiveness of Lessons Learned evaluated, and waste savings presented.

Cournoyer, Michael E [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Nixon, Archie E [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Dodge, Robert L [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Fife, Keith W [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Sandoval, Arnold M [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Garcia, Vincent E [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WIPP PERMIT MODIFICATION AT THE HANFORD TRANSURANIC (TRU) PROGRAM  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Hanford is one of the Department of Energy's sites that ships transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). WIPP's revised Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, granted by the State of New Mexico, required Hanford's TRU Program to make substantial changes to its process for certifying and shipping waste. This paper presents the extent of the changes to WIPP's permit and describes the way Hanford addressed the new requirements.

MCDONALD KM

2007-11-21T23:59:59.000Z

168

Comparison of risk-dominant scenario assumptions for several TRU waste facilities in the DOE complex  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In order to gain a risk management perspective, the DOE Rocky Flats Field Office (RFFO) initiated a survey of other DOE sites regarding risks from potential accidents associated with transuranic (TRU) storage and/or processing facilities. Recently-approved authorization basis documents at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) have been based on the DOE Standard 3011 risk assessment methodology with three qualitative estimates of frequency of occurrence and quantitative estimates of radiological consequences to the collocated worker and the public binned into three severity levels. Risk Class 1 and 2 events after application of controls to prevent or mitigate the accident are designated as risk-dominant scenarios. Accident Evaluation Guidelines for selection of Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs) are based on the frequency and consequence bin assignments to identify controls that can be credited to reduce risk to Risk Class 3 or 4, or that are credited for Risk Class 1 and 2 scenarios that cannot be further reduced. This methodology resulted in several risk-dominant scenarios for either the collocated worker or the public that warranted consideration on whether additional controls should be implemented. RFFO requested the survey because of these high estimates of risks that are primarily due to design characteristics of RFETS TRU waste facilities (i.e., Butler-type buildings without a ventilation and filtration system, and a relatively short distance to the Site boundary). Accident analysis methodologies and key assumptions are being compared for the DOE sites responding to the survey. This includes type of accidents that are risk dominant (e.g., drum explosion, material handling breach, fires, natural phenomena, external events, etc.), source term evaluation (e.g., radionuclide material-at-risk, chemical and physical form, damage ratio, airborne release fraction, respirable fraction, leakpath factors), dispersion analysis (e.g., meteorological assumptions, distance to receptors, plume meander, deposition, and other factors affecting the calculated {chi}/Q), dose assessments (specific activities, inhalation dose conversion factors, breathing rates), designated frequency of occurrence, and risk assignment per the DOE Standard 3011 methodology. Information from the sites is being recorded on a spreadsheet to facilitate comparisons. The first response from Westinghouse Safety Management Solutions for the Savannah River Site (SRS) also provided a detailed analysis of the major differences in methods and assumptions between RFETS and SRS, which forms much of the basis for this paper. Other sites responding to the survey include the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), Hanford, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL).

Foppe, T.L. [Foppe and Associates, Inc., Golden, CO (United States); Marx, D.R. [Westinghouse Safety Management Solutions, Inc., Aiken, SC (United States)

1999-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

Washington: Washington's Clean Energy Resources and Economy (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This document highlights the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's investments and impacts in the state of Washington.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Potential chemical hazards during retrieval of TRU waste drums  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Los Alamos National Laboratory is implementing a program to retrieve a large number of transuranic (TRU) waste containers retrievably stored under earthen cover on three pads. The waste containers will be inspected and overpacked or repackaged as necessary. The majority of the containers are drums (> 16,000) and, as shown in Table 1,99.9% are 208-L (55-gal.) drums. The 208-L drums are reported to be of mild steel construction with removable lids and gaskets. The gaskets are believed to be permeable to hydrogen, but their permeability to volatile organic compounds (VOCS) is not known. As part of the retrieval operations, the drums will be penetrated and then fitted with a carbon-filter-containing venting device to ensure they do not contain flammable gases. A fully contained and high-efficiency air particulate (HEPA) filtered venting system with gas analysis capability for insertion of the vent device has been designed and is being constructed. A Hazards Analysis (HA) has been performed on the system to identify and evaluate potential accidents arising from the operation of the drum venting system.

Kosiewicz, S.T.; Thomas, C.C. Jr.; Sasser, M.K.; Foxx, C.L.; Gruetzmacher, K.M.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Washington/Incentives | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington/Incentives Washington/Incentives < Washington Jump to: navigation, search Contents 1 Financial Incentive Programs for Washington 2 Rules, Regulations and Policies for Washington Download All Financial Incentives and Policies for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 184) Financial Incentive Programs for Washington Download Financial Incentives for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 163) Incentive Incentive Type Active Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Lighting Energy Efficiency Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Energy Efficiency Incentives Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Food Equipment Rebates (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No

172

Southeast Washington Subbasin Planning Ecoregion  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Historic (potential) central arid steppe vegetation zone in the Southeast Washington Subbasin Planning miles of central Washington and occurs in the northwest corner of the Ecoregion is the regularly spacedSoutheast Washington Subbasin Planning Ecoregion Wildlife Assessment Paul R. Ashley and Stacey H

173

HANFORD SITE RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT (RPP) TRANSURANIC (TRU) TANK WASTE IDENTIFICATION & PLANNING FOR REVRIEVAL TREATMENT & EVENTUAL DISPOSAL AT WIPP  

SciTech Connect

The CH2M HILL Manford Group, Inc. (CHG) conducts business to achieve the goals of the Office of River Protection (ORP) at Hanford. As an employee owned company, CHG employees have a strong motivation to develop innovative solutions to enhance project and company performance while ensuring protection of human health and the environment. CHG is responsible to manage and perform work required to safely store, enhance readiness for waste feed delivery, and prepare for treated waste receipts for the approximately 53 million gallons of legacy mixed radioactive waste currently at the Hanford Site tank farms. Safety and environmental awareness is integrated into all activities and work is accomplished in a manner that achieves high levels of quality while protecting the environment and the safety and health of workers and the public. This paper focuses on the innovative strategy to identify, retrieve, treat, and dispose of Hanford Transuranic (TRU) tank waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP).

KRISTOFZSKI, J.G.; TEDESCHI, R.; JOHNSON, M.E.; JENNINGS, M

2006-01-18T23:59:59.000Z

174

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28, 2011 28, 2011 EIS-0423: Final Environmental Impact Statement Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 28, 2011 CX-005134: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Yakama Nation for the Purchase of Three Parcels of Property Along Reecer Creek CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 01/28/2011 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 28, 2011 EIS-0423: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Long -Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 21, 2011 CX-005130: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ringold Substation Structure Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 01/21/2011 Location(s): Basin City, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

175

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 12, 2011 January 12, 2011 The carbon steel doors come together to form an upside-down L-shape. The 102-ton door was set on top of the 85-ton door that was installed at the end of December. Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Sets Massive Protective Shield door in Pretreatment Facility Richland, Wash. -- Earlier this week, an enormous protective shield door was set in the Pretreatment Facility at the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant, also known as the "Vit Plant." The 102-ton door was lowered through the roof and placed on top of an adjoining 85-ton door that was installed at the end of December. January 10, 2011 CX-007074: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Vancouver CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 01/10/2011 Location(s): Vancouver, Washington

176

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 26, 1997 February 26, 1997 EIS-0189: Record of Decision Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, WA December 1, 1996 EA-1111: Final Environmental Assessment K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 21, 1996 EA-1177: Final Environmental Assessment Salvage/Demolition of 200 West Area, 200 East Area, and 300 Area Steam Plants August 1, 1996 EIS-0189: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1996 EIS-0244: Final Environmental Impact Statement Plutonium Finishing Plant Stabilization April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement Disposal of Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser, Ohio Class, Los Angeles and Class Naval Reactor Plants April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement

177

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-007504: Categorical Exclusion Determination 300 Area Nanoscale Research and Development Projects CX(s) Applied: B3.15, A9, B3.6 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 1, 2011 EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Power plant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington November 18, 2011 Demolition Begins on Hanford's Historic Plutonium Vaults - Plutonium Finishing Plant on track to meet regulatory milestone RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) began demolishing a vault complex that once held stores of plutonium for the U.S. nuclear weapons

178

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 15, 2011 April 15, 2011 CX-005676: Categorical Exclusion Determination Murray-Custer #1 Transmission Line Wood Pole Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/15/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 13, 2011 Algae samples back at the NREL lab, ready to be analyzed and run through the Fluorescent-Activated Cell Sorter, or FACS, which separates the cells. | Credit: NREL Staff Photographer Dennis Schroeder. Study: Algae Could Replace 17% of U.S. Oil Imports A new study from Pacific Northwest National Lab concludes that 17% of U.S. oil imports for transportation could be replaced by domestically-produced algae biofuels. April 12, 2011 Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings King County uses $6.1 million to make investments that dramatically reduce

179

I ' Washington, DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

' Washington, DC' ' Washington, DC' 20585 The.Honorable Don Trotter, 102' Public Square Clarksville, Tennessee '37040 '_ _' ' Dear Mayor Trotter: '. Secretary of Energy Hazel .O'Leary has announced a new the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward related to the Clarksville Foundry.& Machine Co. site approach to openness in with the publ,ic'. In " the~enclosed~information in your'jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its predecessor'agencies. This information. is provided, for.your information, use, and retention. remedial action conservative' set of technical investigations to assure environment. If'you have any questions, please feel free~to call DrI W. Alexander Uilliams 301-427-1719 of my staff.

180

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24, 2011 24, 2011 Chemical engineer Alan Zacher 10 Questions for a Chemical Engineer: Alan Zacher Chemical engineer Alan Zacher took some time to share advice for students interested in science and engineering and give us the download on his work developing propylene glycol from renewable sources. March 24, 2011 CX-005523: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Bellevue CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/24/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 22, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Determination Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, WA March 22, 2011 EIS-0422: Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Central Ferry to Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2011 9, 2011 Department of Energy Announces $39 Million to Strengthen University-Led Nuclear Energy Research and Development 51 Projects Aim to Cut Carbon Pollution, Create Clean Energy Jobs and Strengthen America's Nuclear Energy Industry August 9, 2011 CX-006474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Biodiesel Crusher and Dryer Facility Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/09/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 8, 2011 CX-006463: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/08/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 8, 2011

182

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000346: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2009 CX-000457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Focused Site Characterization for Carbon Dioxide Storage Along a Mount Simon Sandstone Fairway in the Michigan Basin CX(s) Applied: A1, A9

183

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 EIS-0333: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration, Benton County, Washington March 1, 2002 EA-1405: Final Environmental Assessment Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 27, 2002 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Mint Farm Generation Project February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-46: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-45: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 15, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-42: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 1, 2002 EIS-0332: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

184

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 16, 2005 March 16, 2005 EIS-0312-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan December 23, 2004 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Hopkins Ridge Wind Interconnection Project September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project, Water Flow Restoration and Streambed Rehabilitation, Providing Passage for Summer Steelhead and Spring Chinook, Funding, Okanogan County, Washington September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project, Whatcom County, Washington

185

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 22, 2011 CX-006255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indian Cabin Road Repair Date: 06/22/2011 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

186

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, 2011 11, 2011 EIS-0422: Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration's Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project March 11, 2011 CX-005421: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohop Underbuild Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6, B4.12 Date: 03/11/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 7, 2011 CX-005417: Categorical Exclusion Determination Beaver Creek Property CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 03/07/2011 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 4, 2011 Latest 200 Area Demolition Offers Snapshot of Hanford Cleanup Progress: Recovery Act Funding Allows Demolition of Power Houses Ahead of Schedule RICHLAND, WASH. - Today's safe and successful explosive demolition at

187

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-006068: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 14, 2011 Massive Cement Pour into Hanford Site Nuclear Facility Underway: Recovery Act Funding Puts U Canyon in Home Stretch of Demolition Preparations RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford workers are pouring enough cement-like material to fill six Olympic-size swimming pools in one of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) largest nuclear facilities at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State to prepare the massive building for demolition. June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2

188

Washington. DC,20585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington. DC,20585 Washington. DC,20585 MAY' i 1995 .- The Honorable Freeman R. Bosley, Jr. ' r City Hall 1200 Narket Street St. Louis, Missouri 63103 Dear Mayor Bosley: ,'~ ,. : !' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary'has announced a new approach to'openness'in " the Department of,Energy"(DOE) and its communications with the pu~blic. In 'support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the enclosed information rel,ated to the former Petrolite Corp. site in your jurisdiction that,performed, work for DDE or,i.ts predecessor agencies. your information, use, and retention. This information is provided for DDE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identification of sites used by DDE's predecessor agencies, determining their

189

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 15, 2010 June 15, 2010 CX-003090: Categorical Exclusion Determination Perform Routine Access Road Maintenance within the McNary-Ross Number 1 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/15/2010 Location(s): Klickitat County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 11, 2010 More than $60 Million in Recovery Act Funding to Expand Local Energy Efficiency Efforts in 20 Communities Competitive block grants to support jobs, save money and increase energy independence June 10, 2010 CX-002767: Categorical Exclusion Determination Granite Mountain 3G Radio Station Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/10/2010 Location(s): Stevens County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2010 Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program

190

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 15, 2002 October 15, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-112: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program October 6, 2002 EIS-0265-SA-92: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program October 2, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-110: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program October 1, 2002 EIS-0332: Mitigation Action Plan McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project September 30, 2002 EIS-025-SA-106: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program -106 SnoKing Tap to Monroe-Samamish Line) within Snohomish County, Washington September 26, 2002 EIS-0246-SA-29: Supplement Analysis Wildlife Mitigation Program, on the Spokane Indian Reservation, near Wellpinit, Stevens County, Washington September 26, 2002 EIS-0265-SA-90: Supplement Analysis

191

ABSORBING WIPP BRINES: A TRU WASTE DISPOSAL STRATEGY  

SciTech Connect

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has completed experiments involving 15 each, 250- liter experimental test containers of transuranic (TRU) heterogeneous waste immersed in two types of brine similar to those found in the underground portion of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). To dispose of the waste without removing the brine from the test containers, LANL added commercially available cross-linked polyacrylate granules to absorb the 190 liters of brine in each container, making the waste compliant for shipping to the WIPP in a Standard Waste Box (SWB). Prior to performing the absorption, LANL and the manufacturer of the absorbent conducted laboratory and field tests to determine the ratio of absorbent to brine that would fully absorb the liquid. Bench scale tests indicated a ratio of 10 parts Castile brine to one part absorbent and 6.25 parts Brine A to one part absorbent. The minimum ratio of absorbent to brine was sought because headspace in the containers was limited. However, full scale testing revealed that the ratio should be adjusted to be about 15% richer in absorbent. Additional testing showed that the absorbent would not apply more than 13.8 kPa pressure on the walls of the vessel and that the absorbent would still function normally at that pressure and would not degrade in the approximately 5e-4 Sv/hr radioactive field produced by the waste. Heat generation from the absorption was minimal. The in situ absorption created a single waste stream of 8 SWBs whereas the least complicated alternate method of disposal would have yielded at least an additional 2600 liters of mixed low level liquid waste plus about two cubic meters of mixed low level solid waste, and would have resulted in higher risk of radiation exposure to workers. The in situ absorption saved $311k in a combination of waste treatment, disposal, material and personnel costs compared to the least expensive alternative and $984k compared to the original plan.

Yeamans, D. R.; Wrights, R. S.

2002-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

192

Absorbing WIPP brines : a TRU waste disposal strategy.  

SciTech Connect

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has completed experiments involving 15 each, 250-liter experimental test containers of transuranic (TRU) heterogeneous waste immersed in two types of brine similar to those found in the underground portion of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). To dispose of the waste without removing the brine from the test containers, LANL added commercially available cross-linked polyacrylate granules to absorb the 190 liters of brine in each container, making the waste compliant for shipping to the WlPP in a Standard Waste Box (SWB). Prior to performing the absorption, LANL and the manufacturer of the absorbent conducted laboratory and field tests to determine the ratio of absorbent to brine that would fully absorb the liquid. Bench scale tests indicated a ratio of 10 parts Castile brine to one part absorbent and 6.25 parts Brine A to one part absorbent. The minimum ratio of absorbent to brine was sought because headspace in the containers was limited. However, full scale testing revealed that the ratio should be adjusted to be about 15% richer in absorbent. Additional testing showed that the absorbent would not apply more than 13.8 kPa pressure on the walls of the vessel and that the absorbent would still function normally at that pressure and would not degrade in the approximately 5e-4 Sv/hr radioactive field produced by the waste. Heat generation from the absorption was minimal. The in situ absorption created a single waste stream of 8 SWBs whereas the least complicated alternate method of disposal would have yielded at least an additional 2600 liters of mixed low level liquid waste plus about two cubic meters of mixed low level solid waste, and would have resulted in higher risk of radiation exposure to workers. The in situ absorption saved $3 1 lk in a combination of waste treatment, disposal, material and personnel costs compared to the least expensive alternative and $984k compared to the original plan.

Yeamans, D. R. (David R.); Wright, R. (Robert)

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Enforcement Documents - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Enforcement Documents - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies associated with the Super High-Efficiency Neutron Counter Non-Destructive Assay System Refurbishment at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant October 28, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 Issued to Diversified Metal Products, Inc. related to Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant August 30, 2004 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington TRU Solutions, LLC - EA-2004-08 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC,

194

Microsoft Word - MOU Between DOE and Germany 9-15-11.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington TRU Solutions LLC, Sandia National Laboratories and Los Alamos National Laboratory joined Mhl and the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) in signing the agreement at DOE...

195

A facility design for repackaging ORNL CH-TRU legacy waste in Building 3525  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

For the last 25 years, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has conducted operations which have generated solid, contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste. At present the CH-TRU waste inventory at ORNL is about 3400 55-gal drums retrievably stored in RCRA-permitted, aboveground facilities. Of the 3400 drums, approximately 2600 drums will need to be repackaged. The current US Department of Energy (DOE) strategy for disposal of these drums is to transport them to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico which only accepts TRU waste that meets a very specific set of criteria documented in the WIPP-WAC (waste acceptance criteria). This report describes activities that were performed from January 1994 to May 1995 associated with the design and preparation of an existing facility for repackaging and certifying some or all of the CH-TRU drums at ORNL to meet the WIPP-WAC. For this study, the Irradiated Fuel Examination Laboratory (IFEL) in Building 3525 was selected as the reference facility for modification. These design activities were terminated in May 1995 as more attractive options for CH-TRU waste repackaging were considered to be available. As a result, this document serves as a final report of those design activities.

Huxford, T.J.; Cooper, R.H. Jr.; Davis, L.E.; Fuller, A.B.; Gabbard, W.A.; Smith, R.B. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Guay, K.P. [S. M. Stroller Corp. (United States); Smith, L.C. [United Energy Services Corp. (United States)

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 19, 2002 July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-95: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-94: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Covington District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-96: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-71: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, located in Umatilla and Sherman Counties, Oregon and Benton and Klickitat Counties, Washington July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-70: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 8, 2002 EIS-0189: Notice of Intent Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Disposal of Immobilized

197

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Washington Information Washington Information to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on AddThis.com... Washington Information This state page compiles information related to alternative fuels and advanced vehicles in Washington and includes new incentives and laws, alternative fueling station locations, truck stop electrification sites, fuel prices, and local points of contact.

198

LANL Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste Shipping  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste Shipping Effort LANL Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste Shipping Effort December 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis From left, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, San Ildefonso Pueblo Governor Terry Aguilar, Los Alamos County Council Chair Sharon Stover, New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez, Los Alamos Site Office Manager Kevin Smith, and Laboratory Director Charles McMillan applaud as the 1,000th shipment of waste leaves Los Alamos National Laboratory. From left, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, San Ildefonso Pueblo Governor Terry Aguilar, Los Alamos County Council Chair Sharon Stover, New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez, Los

199

LANL Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste Shipping  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LANL Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste LANL Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste Shipping Effort LANL Shatters Records in First Year of Accelerated TRU Waste Shipping Effort December 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis From left, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, San Ildefonso Pueblo Governor Terry Aguilar, Los Alamos County Council Chair Sharon Stover, New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez, Los Alamos Site Office Manager Kevin Smith, and Laboratory Director Charles McMillan applaud as the 1,000th shipment of waste leaves Los Alamos National Laboratory. From left, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, San Ildefonso Pueblo Governor Terry Aguilar, Los Alamos County Council Chair Sharon Stover, New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez, Los

200

The effect of vibration on alpha radiolysis of transuranic (TRU) waste  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This paper reports on previously unpublished scoping work related to the potential for vibration to redistribute radionuclides on transuranic (TRU) waste. If this were to happen, the amount of gases generated, including hydrogen, could be increased above the undisturbed levels. This could be an important consideration for transport of TRU wastes either at DOE sites or from them to a future repository, e.g., the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). These preliminary data on drums of real waste seem to suggest that radionuclide redistribution does not occur. However improvements in the experimental methodology are suggested to enhance safety of future experiments on real wastes as well as to provide more rigorous data.

Zerwekh, A.; Kosiewicz, S. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Warren, J. [NFT, Inc., Lakewood, CO (United States)

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

The effect of vibration on alpha radiolysis of transuranic (TRU) waste  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This paper reports on previously unpublished scoping work related to the potential for vibration to redistribute radionuclides on transuranic (TRU) waste. If this were to happen, the amount of gases generated, including hydrogen, could be increased above the undisturbed levels. This could be an important consideration for transport of TRU wastes either at DOE sites or from them to a future repository, e.g., the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). These preliminary data on drums of real waste seem to suggest that radionuclide redistribution does not occur. However improvements in the experimental methodology are suggested to enhance safety of future experiments on real wastes as well as to provide more rigorous data.

Zerwekh, A.; Kosiewicz, S. (Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States)); Warren, J. (NFT, Inc., Lakewood, CO (United States))

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

Washington Nuclear Profile - Power Plants  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Washington nuclear power plants, summer capacity and net generation, 2010" "Plant nametotal reactors","Summer capacity (mw)","Net generation (thousand mwh)","Share of State...

203

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX-009223: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Asbestos Removal Actions CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 08032012 Location(s): Washington...

204

Departmentaf Energy Washington, DC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Departmentaf Departmentaf Energy Washington, DC 20585 MAR 4 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR: James H. Chafin, AL Robert Fisher, CH Steven Hamel, OR William Daubenspeck, LL James Hanley, SAN Robert Southworth, RL Harold Dixon, SR \ Lisa Jarr, FETC"/"',,,-' ( ~ ( ) ( I C{ \'"~V FROM: Paul A. Gottlieb'<,. ~ ' \ Assistant General Counsel . for Technology Transfer / and Intellectual Property SUBJECT: U.S. Competitiveness Provision. Except for the cases discussed further below, attached is the U.S. Competitiveness provision which you should begin providing as our initial negotiating position to inventors/contractors requesting identified and, advance patent waivers. Of course, it is not· expected that every inventor/contractor will agree to the exact language in the provision, in which case modifications to the provision can be made. In those cases where substantial changes are contemplated,

205

Washington, DC,20585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

>/gGq ' >/gGq ' ,, ' .. Department of Edgy Washington, DC,20585 ,I ' , APR 0 4 1995 The Honorable Patrick Ungaro 26 S. Phelps Street Youngstown, Ohio 44503 .' Dear );layor.Ungaro: Secretary of'Energy Hazel O'Leary has announced a new approach to openness in the Oepartment of Energy (DOE) and its coannunications with the public. In support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the,enclosed information related to the former Ajax-Hagnethermic C,orp. site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE's predecessoragencies. This information is~provided for your information, use, and retention. DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identificationof sites used by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and, where it has authority, performing-

206

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 12, 2003 February 12, 2003 EIS-0286: Notice of Intent Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, WA February 12, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-121: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 10, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-120: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Benton County, Washington January 31, 2003 EIS-0325: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Schultz-Hanford Transmission Line Project January 29, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-119: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish-Murray No. 1 Transmission Line January 27, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-118: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Holcomb-Naselle 115kV,

207

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-005337: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 24, 2011 Online Registration Dates Set for 2011 Hanford Tours RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will open online registration on March 8 for tours of the Hanford Site and on March 15 for B Reactor-specific tours. February 24, 2011 Praveen Thallapally | photo courtesy of Pacific Northwest National Lab 10 Questions for a Materials Chemist: Praveen Thallapally Dr. Thallapally gave us an inside look at how he's working to advance carbon capture and geothermal technologies, developing a new class of

208

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 16, 2004 January 16, 2004 EIS-0246-SA-37: Supplement Analysis Wildlife Mitigation Program, On the Spokane Indian Reservation, near Wellpinit, Stevens County, Washington November 10, 2003 EIS-0349: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project October 2, 2003 EA-0307-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Colville Resident Trout Hatchery Project Supplement Analysis September 5, 2003 EIS-0349: Draft Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project July 21, 2003 EIS-0317: Record of Decision Kangley-Echo Lake Transmission Line Project July 14, 2003 EIS-1069-SA-07: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Kilickitat Fisheries Project, Noxious Weed Control at Cle Elum and Jack Creek, Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility and Jack Creek

209

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 17, 2001 August 17, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-23: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 17, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-22: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, King and Snohomish Counties, WA, in the Snohomish Region August 14, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-59: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program August 7, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-58: Supplement Anlalysis Watershed Program - Asotin Creek Channel, Floodplain and Riparian Restoration August 2, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-20: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 1, 2001 EIS-0245-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 24, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-17: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program

210

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2013 June 19, 2013 A Hanford site volunteer helps a Boy Scout practice the Pull, Aim, Squeeze, Sweep, or PASS, fire extinguishing technique at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center in Richland. Local Scouts Train with Hanford Safety Experts - 52 Boy Scouts Earn Merit Badges at the HAMMER Training Facility RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford site services contractor Mission Support Alliance (MSA) hosted a unique opportunity for 52 local Boy Scouts at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center during two consecutive weekends recently. June 14, 2013 EA-1562-SA-1: Supplement Analysis Final Environmental Assessment of Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington June 4, 2013

211

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2, 2004 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2 BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project Volume 2 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Figures BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendices BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project June 23, 2004 EIS-0026-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Commingled Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 7, 2004 EIS-0169-SA-08: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington March 12, 2004 EA-1486: Final Environmental Assessment East and West Diversion Screening Proposal Methow Valley Irrigation District Project

212

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 25, 2010 January 25, 2010 EIS-0391: Updated Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 13, 2010 CX-000471: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Prescribed Burning on the Hanford Site During October, November, and December of 2010 to Maintain Critical Fire Breaks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 8, 2010 EIS-0391: Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 1, 2010 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan December 18, 2009 EIS-0391: Notice of Modification of Preferred Alternatives

213

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 14, 2001 December 14, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-35: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program December 3, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-72: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter Creek/Plum Creek Land Acquisition Phase II December 3, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-34: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program November 15, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-32: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Walla Walla County, Washington November 15, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-69: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program October 29, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-71: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Duncan Creek Channel Rehabilitation Project October 23, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-70: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter

214

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 29, 2006 November 29, 2006 EIS-0183: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Windy Point Wind Energy Project June 26, 2006 EIS-0397: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement Lyle Falls Fishway Project May 1, 2006 EIS-0384: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chief Joseph Hatchery Program March 31, 2006 EA-1547: Finding of No Significant Impact Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site March 1, 2006 EA-1547: Final Environmental Assessment Sodium Residual Reaction/Removal and Other Deactivation Work Activities, Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 17, 2006 EIS-0391: Notice to Extend Scoping Period Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA

215

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2011 18, 2011 Hanford to Host ISMS Safety Workshop in Kennewick: Abstracts Due in June for September Event RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Hanford will hold its annual DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Champions Workshop on September 12-15, 2011, at the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick, Wash. May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Final Environmental Assessment Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project, Walla Walla and Columbia Counties, Washington May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Mitigation Acton Plan Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Finding of No Significant Impact Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 13, 2011 CX-005809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

216

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 13, 2012 July 13, 2012 First of Hanford's Highly Radioactive Sludge Moved Away from River RICHLAND, Wash. - Workers have started moving highly radioactive material, called sludge, awayfrom the Columbia River, marking a significant milestone in the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s cleanup of the Hanford Site in Washington State. July 9, 2012 EA-1912: Draft Environmental Assessment Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project Benton County, WA July 3, 2012 EIS-0312: Record of Decision (2012) Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision: Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Kalispel Tribe July 3, 2012 DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash. RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional

217

Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 5, 2002 September 5, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-107: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program September 2, 2002 EIS-0169-SA-05: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington August 30, 2002 EIS-0332: Final Environmental Impact Statement McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project August 29, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-99: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Final Environmental Impact Statement - Olympia-Grand Coulee No.1 August 22, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-105: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 21, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-104: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 1, 2002 EIS-0344: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement

218

Microsoft Word - washington.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Washington Washington NERC Region(s) ....................................................................................................... WECC Primary Energy Source........................................................................................... Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) ....................................................................... 30,478 10 Electric Utilities ...................................................................................................... 26,498 5 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power ................................ 3,979 26 Net Generation (megawatthours) ........................................................................... 103,472,729 15

219

Biofuels in Oregon and Washington  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PNNL-17351 Biofuels in Oregon and Washington A Business Case Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges Prepared by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory #12;#12;Biofuels in Oregon and Washington, particularly in light of the recent growth experienced by the biofuels industry in the Midwest. Policymakers

220

Secretary Chu Webchat with the Washington Post | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Webchat with the Washington Post Secretary Chu Webchat with the Washington Post Secretary Chu Webchat with the Washington Post April 22, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, DC - Today, on the 40th anniversary of Earth Day, Secretary Chu participated in an online chat on washingtonpost.com. He answered questions on a number of topics, from energy efficiency to clean energy manufacturing. You can read the full transcript here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/04/22/DI2010042201410.html?hpid=discussions Media contact(s): (202)586-4940 Addthis Related Articles Chu Highlights Scientific Solutions to the Energy Crisis on New Facebook Page Vice President Biden Kicks Off Five Days of Earth Day Activities with Announcement of Major New Energy Efficiency Effort Department of Energy Announces 20th Annual National Science Bowl

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Secretary Chu Webchat with the Washington Post | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chu Webchat with the Washington Post Chu Webchat with the Washington Post Secretary Chu Webchat with the Washington Post April 22, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, DC - Today, on the 40th anniversary of Earth Day, Secretary Chu participated in an online chat on washingtonpost.com. He answered questions on a number of topics, from energy efficiency to clean energy manufacturing. You can read the full transcript here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/04/22/DI2010042201410.html?hpid=discussions Media contact(s): (202)586-4940 Addthis Related Articles Chu Highlights Scientific Solutions to the Energy Crisis on New Facebook Page Vice President Biden Kicks Off Five Days of Earth Day Activities with Announcement of Major New Energy Efficiency Effort Department of Energy Announces 20th Annual National Science Bowl

222

Washington | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington Washington Last updated on 2013-11-05 Current News The Washington State Building Code Council recently completed deliberations on adoption and amendment of the 2012 codes. This includes adoption of the 2012 IECC with state amendments. The new codes became effective July 1, 2013. Commercial Residential Code Change Current Code State Specific Amendments / Additional State Code Information WA 2012 Nonresidential Codes Approved Compliance Tools Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Tools Approximate Energy Efficiency Equivalent to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Effective Date 07/01/2013 Adoption Date 02/01/2013 Code Enforcement Mandatory DOE Determination ASHRAE 90.1-2007: Yes ASHRAE 90.1-2010: Yes Washington DOE Determination Letter, May 31, 2013 Washington State Certification of Commercial and Residential Building Energy Codes

223

Impact of PWR spent fuel variations on TRU-fueled VHTRS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Several alternative strategies are being considered as spent nuclear fuel (SNF) management options. Transuranic nuclides (TRU) are responsible for the SNF long-term radiotoxicity beyond the first 500 years. One of the most viable approaches suggests creating new transmutation fuels containing TRUs for use in thermal and fast nuclear reactors. Irradiation of TRUs results in their transmutation and ultimate incineration by fission. The objective of this thesis is to analyze the impact of conventional PWR spent fuel variations on TRU-fueled Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) systems. This effort was focused on the prismatic core configuration. The 3D core models were created for use in calculations with the SCALE 5.1 code system. As part of the research effort, basic nuclear characteristics of TRUs were taken into consideration. The potential variations of PWR spent fuel compositions were modeled with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System, VISTA. The VHTR configurations with varying TRU compositions were analyzed assuming a single-batch core operation. Their performance was compared to the VHTR cases with low enriched uranium (LEU). The analysis shows that TRUs can be effectively utilized in the VHTR systems. The TRU-fueled VHTRs exhibit favorable performance characteristics.

Alajo, Ayodeji Babatunde

2007-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

224

Heavy metal inventory and fuel sustainability of recycling TRU in FBR design  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Nuclear fuel materials from spent fuel of light water reactors have a potential to be used for destructive devices with very huge energy release or in the same time, it can be utilized as a peaceful energy or civil applications, for generating electricity, desalination of water, medical application and others applications. Several research activities showed some recycled spent fuel can be used as additional fuel loading for increasing fuel breeding capability as well as improving intrinsic aspect of nuclear non-proliferation. The present investigation intends to evaluate the composition of heavy metals inventories and fuel breeding capability in the FBR design based on the loaded fuel of light water reactor (LWR) spent fuel (SF) of 33 GWd/t with 5 years cooling time by adopting depletion code of ORIGEN. Whole core analysis of FBR design is performed by adopting and coupling codes such as SLAROM code, JOINT and CITATION codes. Nuclear data library, JFS-3-J-3.2R which is based on the JENDL 3.2 has been used for nuclear data analysis. JSFR design is the basis design reference which basically adopted 800 days cycle length for 4 batches system. Higher inventories of plutonium of MOX fuel and TRU fuel types at equilibrium composition than initial composition have been shown. Minor actinide (MA) inventory compositions obtain a different inventory trends at equilibrium composition for both fuel types. Higher Inventory of MA is obtained by MOX fuel and less MA inventory for TRU fuel at equilibrium composition than initial composition. Some different MA inventories can be estimated from the different inventory trend of americium (Am). Higher americium inventory for MOX fuel and less americium inventory for TRU fuel at equilibrium condition. Breeding ratio of TRU fuel is relatively higher compared with MOX fuel type. It can be estimated from relatively higher production of Pu-238 (through converted MA) in TRU fuel, and Pu-238 converts through neutron capture to produce Pu-239. Higher breeding ratio of MOX fuel and TRU fuel types at equilibrium condition are estimated from converted fertile material during reactor operation into fissile material of plutonium such as converted uranium fuel (converted U-238 into Pu-239) or additional converted fuel from MA into Pu-238 and changes into Pu-239 by capturing neutron. Loading LWR SF gives better fuel breeding capability and increase inventory of MA for doping material of MOX fuel; however, it requires more supply MA inventory for TRU fuel type.

Permana, Sidik; Suzuki, Mitsutoshi; Su'ud, Zaki [Department of Science and Technology for Nuclear Material Management (STNM), Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 2-4 Shirane, Shirakata, Tokai Mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1195 Nuclear Physics and Bio (Indonesia); Department of Science and Technology for Nuclear Material Management (STNM), Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 2-4 Shirane, Shirakata, Tokai Mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1195 (Japan); Nuclear Physics and Bio Physics Research Group, Department of Physics, Bandung Institute of Technology, Gedung Fisika, Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132 (Indonesia)

2012-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

225

Washington DC | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington DC Home Linked Open Data Workshop in Washington, D.C. Description: A group organizing the LOD workshop in Washington, D.C. in fall 2012 A follow-up event to the...

226

Washington Datos del Precio de la Gasolina  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WashingtonGasPrices.com (Busqueda por Ciudad o Cdigo Postal) - GasBuddy.com Washington Gas Prices (Ciudades Selectas) - GasBuddy.com Washington Gas Prices (Organizado por...

227

Washington Gas Energy Services | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Gas Energy Services (Redirected from WGES) Jump to: navigation, search Name Washington Gas Energy Services Place Virginia Utility Id 20659 Utility Location Yes Ownership...

228

Washington Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Washington Joint...

229

TRU decontamination of high-level Purex waste by solvent extraction using a mixed octyl(phenyl)-N,N-diisobutyl-carbamoylmethylphosphine oxide/TBP/NPH (TRUEX) solvent  

SciTech Connect

The TRUEX (transuranium extraction) process was tested on a simulated high-level dissolved sludge waste (DSW). A batch counter-current extraction mode was used for seven extraction and three scrub stages. One additional extraction stage and two scrub stages and all strip stages were performed by batch extraction. The TRUEX solvent consisted of 0.20 M octyl(phenyl)-N,N-diisobutylcarbamoyl-methylphosphine oxide-1.4 M TBP in Conoco (C/sub 12/-C/sub 14/). The feed solution was 1.0 M in HNO/sub 3/, 0.3 M in H/sub 2/C/sub 2/O/sub 4/ and contained mixed (stable) fission products, U, Np, Pu, and Am, and a number of inert constituents, e.g., Fe and Al. The test showed that the process is capable of reducing the TRU concentration in the DSW by a factor of 4 x 10/sup 4/ (to <100 nCi/g of disposed form) and reducing the quantity of TRU waste by two orders of magnitude.

Horwitz, E.P.; Kalina, D.G.; Diamond, H.; Kaplan, L.; Vandegrift, G.F.; Leonard, R.A.; Steindler, M.J.; Schulz, W.W.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Recovery Act State Memos Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington Washington For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION TABLE.............................................................................. 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................... 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY ............................................................................................. 6

231

Adequacy of a Small Quantity Site RH-TRU Waste Program in Meeting Proposed WIPP Characterization Objectives  

SciTech Connect

The first remote-handled transuranic (RH-TRU) waste is expected to be permanently disposed of at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) during Fiscal Year (FY) 2003. The first RH-TRU waste shipments are scheduled from the Battelle Columbus Laboratories (BCL) to WIPP in order to facilitate compliance with BCL Decommissioning Project (BCLDP) milestones. Milestones requiring RH-TRU waste containerization and removal from the site by 2004 in order to meet a 2006 site closure goal, established by Congress in the Defense Facilities Closure Projects account, necessitated the establishment and implementation of a site-specific program to direct the packaging of BCLDP RH-TRU waste prior to the finalization of WIPP RH-TRU waste characterization requirements. The program was designed to collect waste data, including audio and videotape records of waste packaging, such that upon completion of waste packaging, comprehensive data records exist from which compliance with final WIPP RH-TRU waste characterization requirements can be demonstrated. With the BCLDP data records generated to date and the development by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) of preliminary documents proposing the WIPP RH-TRU waste characterization program, it is possible to evaluate the adequacy of the BCLDP program with respect to meeting proposed characterization objectives. The BCLDP characterization program uses primarily acceptable knowledge (AK) and visual examination (VE) during waste packaging to characterize RH-TRU waste. These methods are used to estimate physical waste parameters, including weight percentages of metals, cellulosics, plastics, and rubber in the waste, and to determine the absence of prohibited items, including free liquids. AK combined with computer modeling is used to estimate radiological waste parameters, including total activity on a waste container basis, for the majority of BCLDP RH-TRU waste. AK combined with direct analysis is used to characterize radiological parameters for the small populations of the RH-TRU waste generated by the BCLDP. All characterization based on AK is verified. Per its design for comprehensive waste data collection, the BCLDP characterization program using AK and waste packaging procedures, including VE during packaging, meets the proposed WIPP RH-TRU waste characterization objectives. The conservative program design implemented generates certification data that will be adequate to meet any additional program requirements that may be imposed by the CBFO.

Biedscheid, J.; Stahl, S.; Devarakonda, M.; Peters, K.; Eide, J.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

232

Development of an Alternative Treatment Scheme for Sr/TRU Removal: Permanganate Treatment of AN-107 Waste  

SciTech Connect

A number of Hanford tanks received waste containing organic complexants, which increase the volubility of Sr-90 and transuranic (TRU) elements. Wastes from these tanks require additional pretreatment to remove Sr-90 and TRU for immobilization as low activity waste (Waste Envelope C). The baseline pretreatment process for Sr/TRU removal was isotopic exchange and precipitation with added strontium and iron. However, studies at both Battelle and Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC) have shown that the Sr/Fe precipitates were very difficult to filter. This was a result of the formation of poor filtering iron solids. An alternate treatment technology was needed for Sr/TRU removal. Battelle had demonstrated that permanganate treatment was effective for decontaminating waste samples from Hanford Tank SY-101 and proposed that permanganate be examined as an alternative Sr/TRU removal scheme for complexant-containing tank wastes such as AW107. Battelle conducted preliminary small-scale experiments to determine the effectiveness of permanganate treatment with AN-107 waste samples that had been archived at Battelle from earlier studies. Three series of experiments were performed to evaluate conditions that provided adequate Sr/TRU decontamination using permanganate treatment. The final series included experiments with actual AN-107 diluted feed that had been obtained specifically for BNFL process testing. Conditions that provided adequate Sr/TRU decontamination were identified. A free hydroxide concentration of 0.5M provided adequate decontamination with added Sr of 0.05M and permanganate of 0.03M for archived AN-107. The best results were obtained when reagents were added in the sequence Sr followed by permanganate with the waste at ambient temperature. The reaction conditions for Sr/TRU removal will be further evaluated with a 1-L batch of archived AN-107, which will provide a large enough volume of waste to conduct crossflow filtration studies (Hallen et al. 2000a).

RT Hallen; SA Bryan; FV Hoopes

2000-08-04T23:59:59.000Z

233

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Bainbridge Bainbridge Island, Washington to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

234

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Better Buildings Partners Better Buildings Partners Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA

235

Pyrolysis/Steam Reforming Technology for Treatment of TRU Orphan Wastes  

SciTech Connect

Certain transuranic (TRU) waste streams within the Department of Energy (DOE) complex cannot be disposed of at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) because they do not meet the shipping requirements of the TRUPACT-II or the disposal requirements of the Waste Analysis Plan (WAP) in the WIPP RCRA Part B Permit. These waste streams, referred to as orphan wastes, cannot be shipped or disposed of because they contain one or more prohibited items, such as liquids, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrogen gas, corrosive acids or bases, reactive metals, or high concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), etc. The patented, non-incineration, pyrolysis and steam reforming processes marketed by THOR Treatment Technologies LLC removes all of these prohibited items from drums of TRU waste and produces a dry, inert, inorganic waste material that meets the existing TRUPACT-II requirements for shipping, as well as the existing WAP requirements for disposal of TRU waste at WIPP. THOR Treatment Technologies is a joint venture formed in June 2002 by Studsvik, Inc. (Studsvik) and Westinghouse Government Environmental Services Company LLC (WGES) to further develop and deploy Studsvik's patented THORSM technology within the DOE and Department of Defense (DoD) markets. The THORSM treatment process is a commercially proven system that has treated over 100,000 cu. ft. of nuclear waste from commercial power plants since 1999. Some of this waste has had contact dose rates of up to 400 R/hr. A distinguishing characteristic of the THORSM process for TRU waste treatment is the ability to treat drums of waste without removing the waste contents from the drum. This feature greatly minimizes criticality and contamination issues for processing of plutonium-containing wastes. The novel features described herein are protected by issued and pending patents.

Mason, J. B.; McKibbin, J.; Schmoker, D.; Bacala, P.

2003-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

236

NR-SRS TRU Waste Shipments Milestone June 4 2013.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 4, 2013 June 4, 2013 Bill Taylor, DOE-SR, (803) 952-8564 bill.taylor@srs.gov DT Townsend, SRNS, (803) 952-7566 Dt-lawrence.townsend@srs.gov Savannah River Site Exceeds Waste Shipment Goals AIKEN, S.C. - During the month of April, the Savannah River Site met two new milestone records towards analyzing, preparing, packaging and shipping radioactive transuranic (TRU) waste bound for a

237

New Facility Aids in Lab's Capability to Ship TRU Waste to WIPP |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Aids in Lab's Capability to Ship TRU Waste to WIPP Facility Aids in Lab's Capability to Ship TRU Waste to WIPP New Facility Aids in Lab's Capability to Ship TRU Waste to WIPP December 1, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers move standard waste boxes to the High-Energy Real Time Radiography facility. Workers move standard waste boxes to the High-Energy Real Time Radiography facility. A standard waste box enters the HE-RTR at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The facility x-rays waste drums that contain high-density items such as motors and pumps and larger containers known as standard waste boxes. A standard waste box enters the HE-RTR at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The facility x-rays waste drums that contain high-density items such as motors and pumps and larger containers known as standard waste boxes. Workers move standard waste boxes to the High-Energy Real Time Radiography facility.

238

RETRIEVING SUSPECT TRANSURANIC (TRU) WASTE FROM THE HANFORD BURIAL GROUNDS PROGRESS PLANS & CHALLENGES  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes the scope and status of the program for retrieval of suspect transuranic (TRU) waste stored in the Hanford Site low-level burial grounds. Beginning in 1970 and continuing until the late 1980's, waste suspected of containing significant quantities of transuranic isotopes was placed in ''retrievable'' storage in designated modules in the Hanford burial grounds, with the intent that the waste would be retrieved when a national repository for disposal of such waste became operational. Approximately 15,000 cubic meters of waste, suspected of being TRU, was placed in storage modules in four burial grounds. With the availability of the national repository (the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant), retrieval of the suspect TRU waste is now underway. Retrieval efforts, to date, have been conducted in storage modules that contain waste, which is in general, contact-handled, relatively new (1980's and later), is stacked in neat, engineered configurations, and has a relatively good record of waste characteristics. Even with these optimum conditions, retrieval personnel have had to deal with a large number of structurally degraded containers, radioactive contamination issues, and industrial hazards (including organic vapors). Future retrieval efforts in older, less engineered modules are expected to present additional hazards and difficult challenges.

FRENCH, M.S.

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

TRU waste acceptance criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

This document is intended to delineate the criteria by which unclassified waste will be accepted for emplacement at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in southeastern New Mexico and describe the bases upon which these criteria were established. These criteria are not intended to be specifications but rather limits that will allow waste generating and shipping sites to develop their own procedures and specifications for preparation of TRU waste for shipment to the WIPP. These criteria will also allow waste generating sites to plan future facilities for waste preparation that will produce TRU waste forms compatible with WIPP waste emplacement and isolation requirements. These criteria only apply to contract-handled (CH) and remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste forms and are not intended to apply to beta-gamma wastes, spent fuel, high-level waste (HLW), low-level waste (LLW), low specific activity (LSA) waste, or forms of radioactive waste for experimental purposes. Specifications for receipt of experimental waste forms will be prepared by the responsible projects in conjunction with the staff of the WIPP project at a later date. In addition, these criteria only apply to waste emplaced in bedded rock salt. Technical bases for these criteria may differ significantly from those for other host rocks. 25 refs. 4 figs., 1 tab.

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Hanford Sr/TRU Decontamination Program: Research from Beaker to Pilot Scale  

SciTech Connect

Plutonium and americium are present in the Hanford High Level Liquid Waste complexant concentrate (CC) waste due to the presence of complexing agents including di-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (D2EHPA), tributylphosphate (TBP), hydroxyethylene diamine triacetic acid (HEDTA), ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid, glycolic acid, and sodium gluconate. The transuranic (TRU) concentrations approach 600 nCi/g and require processing prior to encapsulation into low activity glass. The Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC) has been actively participating in the development of a strontium/TRU decontamination process for the CC waste stored at Hanford in Tanks AN-107 and AN-102. The current baseline flowsheet involves the addition of strontium nitrate to effectively remove radio-strontium through an isotopic dilution, followed by a sodium permanganate strike to co-precipitate the actinides in the in-situ produced manganese solid phases. Demonstration efforts to validate the Sr/TRU flowsheet have included beaker scale reagent optimization and reaction kinetics testing and engineering scale-up experiments at the multi-liter and 1/100th plant scale (200-gallon) using both simulated and actual waste samples. Several key process engineering and process chemistry needs were identified during a recent Hanford Waste Treatment Plant project risk review.

Wilmarth, W.R.

2003-02-18T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Hydrogen venting characteristics of commercial carbon-composite filters and applications to TRU waste  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The generation of hydrogen (by radiolysis) and of other potentially flammable gases in radioactive wastes which are in contact with hydrogenous materials is a source of concern, both from transportation and on-site storage considerations. Because very little experimental data on the generation and accumulation of hydrogen was available in actual waste materials, work was initiated to experimentally determine factors affecting the concentration of hydrogen in the waste containers, such as the hydrogen generation rate, (G-values) and the rate of loss of hydrogen through packaging and commercial filter-vents, including a new design suitable for plastic bags. This report deals only with the venting aspect of the problem. Hydrogen venting characteristics of two types of commercial carbon-composite filter-vents, and two types of PVC bag closures (heat-sealed and twist-and-tape) were measured. Techniques and equipment were developed to permit measurement of the hydrogen concentration in various layers of actual transuranic (TRU) waste packages, both with and without filter-vents. A test barrel was assembled containing known configuration and amounts of TRU wastes. Measurements of the hydrogen in the headspace verified a hydrogen release model developed by Benchmark Environmental Corporation. These data were used to calculate revised wattage Emits for TRU waste packages incorporating the new bag filter-vent.

Callis, E.L.; Marshall, R.S. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Cappis, J.H. [DOE, International Safeguards Div., Washington, DC (United States)] [and others

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Methods for removing transuranic elements from waste solutions  

SciTech Connect

This report outlines a treatment scheme for separating and concentrating the transuranic (TRU) elements present in aqueous waste solutions stored at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The treatment method selected is carrier precipitation. Potential carriers will be evaluated in future laboratory work, beginning with ferric hydroxide and magnetite. The process will result in a supernatant with alpha activity low enough that it can be treated in the existing evaporator/concentrator at ANL. The separated TRU waste will be packaged for shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.

Slater, S.A.; Chamberlain, D.B.; Connor, C.; Sedlet, J.; Srinivasan, B.; Vandegrift, G.F.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

Washington Biodiesel | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Logo: Washington Biodiesel Name Washington Biodiesel Address 3401 Fremont Avenue N. Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98103 Sector Biofuels Product Aims to grow biodiesel feedstock Website http://wabiodiesel.com/ Coordinates 47.6495905°, -122.3497956° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6495905,"lon":-122.3497956,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

244

Washington International Renewable Energy Conference | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington International Renewable Energy Conference Washington International Renewable Energy Conference Washington International Renewable Energy Conference March 4, 2008 - 10:52am Addthis Remarks as Prepared For Delivery by Secretary Bodman Thank you very much, Hermann, for that kind introduction. I'm quite pleased to be a part of this important conference, and I want to thank everyone who worked so hard to put it together. Renewable energy is helping us bring about a new energy future, one that is cleaner, more sustainable, more affordable, more secure and less reliant on carbon-based fossil fuels. While there is no "silver bullet" that will solve the world's energy problems, it is clear that renewable energy and efficiency technologies are an indispensable component of the solution. We must continue to aggressively pursue their development and widespread

245

Why sequence Bacteria from Lake Washington?  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

bacteria from Lake Washington? bacteria from Lake Washington? Previous collaborations between the University of Washington team and the DOE JGI involving both single genome and metagenomic sequencing have greatly enhanced the community's ability to explore the diversity of bacteria functionally active in metabolism of single carbon compounds, known as methylotrophs, isolated from Lake Washington (Seattle, Washington) sediment. Sequencing genomes of 50 methylotroph isolates from the Lake Washington will further enhance the methylotroph community knowledge database providing a much higher level of resolution of global (meta)transcriptomic and (meta)proteomic analyses, as well as species interaction studies, informing a better understanding of biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen.

246

MANAGEMENT OF TRANSURANIC (TRU) WASTE RETRIEVAL PROJECT RISKS SUCCESSES IN THE STARTUP OF THE HANFORD 200 AREA TRU WASTE RETRIEVAL PROJECT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A risk identification and mitigation method applied to the Transuranic (TRU) Waste Retrieval Project performed at the Hanford 200 Area burial grounds is described. Retrieval operations are analyzed using process flow diagramming. and the anticipated project contingencies are included in the Authorization Basis and operational plans. Examples of uncertainties assessed include degraded container integrity, bulged drums, unknown containers, and releases to the environment. Identification and mitigation of project risks contributed to the safe retrieval of over 1700 cubic meters of waste without significant work stoppage and below the targeted cost per cubic meter retrieved. This paper will be of interest to managers, project engineers, regulators, and others who are responsible for successful performance of waste retrieval and other projects with high safety and performance risks.

GREENWLL, R.D.

2005-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

247

DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRU WASTE TRANSPORTATION FLEET--A SUCCESS STORY  

SciTech Connect

Since March 1999, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located in southeastern New Mexico, has been operated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO), as a repository for the permanent disposal of defense-related transuranic (TRU) waste. More than 1,450 shipments of TRU waste for WIPP disposal have been completed, and the WIPP is currently receiving 12 to 16 shipments per week from five DOE sites around the nation. One of the largest fleets of Type B packagings supports the transportation of TRU waste to WIPP. This paper discusses the development of this fleet since the original Certificate of Compliance (C of C) for the Transuranic Package Transporter-II (TRUPACT-II) was issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 1989. Evolving site programs, closure schedules of major sites, and the TRU waste inventory at the various DOE sites have directed the sizing and packaging mix of this fleet. This paper discusses the key issues that guided this fleet development, including the following: While the average weight of a 55-gallon drum packaging debris could be less than 300 pounds (lbs.), drums containing sludge waste or compacted waste could approach the maximum allowable weight of 1,000 lbs. A TRUPACT-II shipment may consist of three TRUPACT-II packages, each of which is limited to a total weight of 19,250 lbs. Payload assembly weights dictated by ''as-built'' TRUPACT-II weights limit each drum to an average weight of 312 lbs when three TRUPACT-IIs are shipped. To optimize the shipment of heavier drums, the HalfPACT packaging was designed as a shorter and lighter version of the TRUPACT-II to accommodate a heavier load. Additional packaging concepts are currently under development, including the ''TRUPACT-III'' packaging being designed to address ''oversized'' boxes that are currently not shippable in the TRUPACT-II or HalfPACT due to size constraints. Shipment optimization is applicable not only to the addition of new packagings, but also to the addition of new payload containers (used inside the NRC-approved Type B packaging) with revised design limits. For example, to address the shipment of specific TRU waste forms, a series of pipe overpack payload containers have been designed and approved by the NRC. The ''standard'' pipe overpack configuration is designed to allow the shipment of higher fissile gram containers, each with a maximum fissile gram equivalent (FGE) loading of 200 grams (g). For shipments of waste packaged in the standard pipe overpack, the FGE limit is 2,800 g per TRUPACT-II and 1,400 g per HalfPACT. The ''S100'' and ''S200'' pipe overpack configurations allow the use of shielded configurations of the pipe overpack for shipment of specific gamma- and neutron-emitting waste forms. The 72-B Cask and the 10-160B Cask have been approved by the NRC for the transportation of remote-handled (RH) TRU waste, which comprises a small fraction of the overall inventory that will be shipped to WIPP.

Devarakonda, Murthy; Morrison, Cindy; Brown, Mike

2003-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

248

Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Directorate, Washington ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Directorate, Washington, DC. NVLAP Lab Code: 100565-10. Address and Contact Information: Naval Reactors ...

2013-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

249

Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Directorate, Washington ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Directorate, Washington, DC. NVLAP Lab Code: 100565-0. Address and Contact Information: ...

2013-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

250

Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Directorate, Washington ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Directorate, Washington, DC. NVLAP Lab Code: 100565-2. Address and Contact Information: Point Loma, Bldg. ...

2013-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

251

The Nevada Test Site Legacy TRU Waste - The WIPP Central Characterization Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper discusses the Central Characterization Project (CCP) designed by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to aid sites, especially those sites with small quantities of transuranic (TRU) waste streams, in disposing of legacy waste at their facility. Because of the high cost of contracting vendors with the characterization capabilities necessary to meet the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria, utilizing the CCP is meant to simplify the process for small quantity sites. The paper will describe the process of mobilization of the vendors through CCP, the current production milestones that have been met, and the on-site lessons learned.

Norton, J. F.; Lahoud, R. G.; Foster, B. D.; VanMeighem, J.

2003-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

252

Preliminary Notice of Violation,Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC - NEA-2011-02 Preliminary Notice of Violation,Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC - NEA-2011-02 July 22, 2011 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC related to a Puncture Wound Injury resulting in a Radiological Uptake at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with the June 14, 2010, employee puncture wound injury, which occurred in the F-TRU Remediation Enclosure within the F-Canyon Facility, at the U.S. Department of Energy' s (DOE) Savannah River Site. This occurrence was reported in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-SRSO--SRNS-CPWM-20IO-0002, Contaminated Puncture Wound During TRU Drum

253

Tank waste consolidation analysis for transfer of ORNL RH-TRU tank sludges to the Melton Valley Storage Tanks  

SciTech Connect

The objective of this work is to evaluate the schedule and technical issues associated with consolidation of Remote Handled Transuranic (RH-TRU) sludges in the Melton Valley Storage Tanks (MVSTs). This work supports the DOE Transuranic Waste (TRU) Program plans for private sector treatment of all ORNL TRU sludges for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Transfer of these sludges must be completed in FY 2000 to meet the required schedule for beginning shipment of treated sludges to the WIPP by 2002. This study was performed to (1) evaluate the sludge transfer schedule, (2) evaluate the ability of existing tank systems to contain and manage the sludges and liquids generated during the transfers, and (3) evaluate the costs and schedules of different solid/liquid separation and solids-monitoring methods used during sludge transfer for management of sluice waters.

Kent, T.E.; DePaoli, S.M.

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

IMPROVEMENTS IN CONTAINER MANAGEMENT OF TRANSURANIC (TRU) AND LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORED AT THE CENTRAL WASTE COMPLEX (CWC) AT HANFORD  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Central Waste Complex (CWC) is the interim storage facility for Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) mixed waste, transuranic waste, transuranic mixed waste, low-level and low-level mixed radioactive waste at the Department of Energy's (DOE'S) Hanford Site. The majority of the waste stored at the facility is retrieved from the low-level burial grounds in the 200 West Area at the Site, with minor quantities of newly generated waste from on-site and off-site waste generators. The CWC comprises 18 storage buildings that house 13,000 containers. Each waste container within the facility is scanned into its location by building, module, tier and position and the information is stored in a site-wide database. As waste is retrieved from the burial grounds, a preliminary non-destructive assay is performed to determine if the waste is transuranic (TRU) or low-level waste (LLW) and subsequently shipped to the CWC. In general, the TRU and LLW waste containers are stored in separate locations within the CWC, but the final disposition of each waste container is not known upon receipt. The final disposition of each waste container is determined by the appropriate program as process knowledge is applied and characterization data becomes available. Waste containers are stored within the CWC based on their physical chemical and radiological hazards. Further segregation within each building is done by container size (55-gallon, 85-gallon, Standard Waste Box) and waste stream. Due to this waste storage scheme, assembling waste containers for shipment out of the CWC has been time consuming and labor intensive. Qualitatively, the ratio of containers moved to containers in the outgoing shipment has been excessively high, which correlates to additional worker exposure, shipment delays, and operational inefficiencies. These inefficiencies impacted the LLW Program's ability to meet commitments established by the Tri-Party Agreement, an agreement between the State of Washington, the Department of Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency. These commitments require waste containers to be shipped off site for disposal and/or treatment within a certain time frame. Because the program was struggling to meet production demands, the Production and Planning group was tasked with developing a method to assist the LLW Program in fulfilling its requirements. Using existing databases for container management, a single electronic spreadsheet was created to visually map every waste container within the CWC. The file displays the exact location (e.g., building, module, tier, position) of each container in a format that replicates the actual layout in the facility. In addition, each container was placed into a queue defined by the LLW and TRU waste management programs. The queues were developed based on characterization requirements, treatment type and location, and potential final disposition. This visual aid allows the user to select containers from similar queues and view their location within the facility. The user selects containers in a centralized location, rather than random locations, to expedite shipments out of the facility. This increases efficiency for generating the shipments, as well as decreasing worker exposure and container handling time when gathering containers for shipment by reducing movements of waste container. As the containers are collected for shipment, the remaining containers are segregated by queue, which further reduces future container movements.

UYTIOCO EM

2007-11-14T23:59:59.000Z

255

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay for the TRU Waste Characterization Program. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for Nondestructive Assay (NDA) consists of a series of tests conducted on a regular frequency to evaluate the capability for nondestructive assay of transuranic (TRU) waste throughout the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Each test is termed a PDP cycle. These evaluation cycles provide an objective measure of the reliability of measurements performed with TRU waste characterization systems. Measurement facility performance will be demonstrated by the successful analysis of blind audit samples according to the criteria set by this Program Plan. Intercomparison between measurement groups of the DOE complex will be achieved by comparing the results of measurements on similar or identical blind samples reported by the different measurement facilities. Blind audit samples (hereinafter referred to as PDP samples) will be used as an independent means to assess the performance of measurement groups regarding compliance with established Quality Assurance Objectives (QAOs). As defined for this program, a PDP sample consists of a 55-gallon matrix drum emplaced with radioactive standards and fabricated matrix inserts. These PDP sample components, once manufactured, will be secured and stored at each participating measurement facility designated and authorized by Carlsbad Area Office (CAO) under secure conditions to protect them from loss, tampering, or accidental damage.

None

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington Washington Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 22, 2013 CX-010734: Categorical Exclusion Determination Covington District Culvert Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2013 CX-010735: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell No.5 Dead End Insulator Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 24, 2013 CX-011171: Categorical Exclusion Determination Longview and Tillamook Substation Communication Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 09/24/2013

257

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Seattle, Seattle, Washington to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO NE | NV | NH | NJ | NY NC | OH | OR | PA | SC TN | TX | VT | VI | VA

258

Washington,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DC 20585 December 20, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT FROM: William S. Maharay Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act" Audit Report No.: OAS-L-06-04 We reviewed selected aspects of the Department.of Energy's (Department) implementation of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982. FMFIA requires that agencies establish management control and financial systems to provide reasonable assurance that the integrity of Federal programs and operations is protected. Furthermore, it requires that the head of the agency provide an annual assurance statement on whether the agency has met this

259

Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 5, 2011 December 5, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIAL OFFICERS AND HEADS OF FIELD ORGANIZATIONS FROM: SUBJECT: !~::o~~~ral Cou;;(} '/-- Reminder Regarding Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) Planning Summaries Early involvement by senior management in the NEP A planning process is a key component of a successful NEP A compliance program. Thus, Department of Energy (DOE) Order 451.1 B requires that each Secretarial Officer and Head of a Field Organization submit an annual NEP A planning summary to the General Counsel by January 31 of each year and make it available to the public. Preparation of these summaries helps ensure that NEP A activities are aligned with program priorities and that resources are allocated to enable timely completion ofNEPA

260

Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay of Drummed Wastes for the TRU Waste Characterization Program  

SciTech Connect

The Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) for Nondestructive Assay (NDA) is a test program designed to yield data on measurement system capability to characterize drummed transuranic (TRU) waste generated throughout the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. The tests are conducted periodically and provide a mechanism for the independent and objective assessment of NDA system performance and capability relative to the radiological characterization objectives and criteria of the Office of Characterization and Transportation (OCT). The primary documents requiring an NDA PDP are the Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WAC), which requires annual characterization facility participation in the PDP, and the Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD). This NDA PDP implements the general requirements of the QAPD and applicable requirements of the WAC. Measurement facilities must demonstrate acceptable radiological characterization performance through measurement of test samples comprised of pre-specified PDP matrix drum/radioactive source configurations. Measurement facilities are required to analyze the NDA PDP drum samples using the same procedures approved and implemented for routine operational waste characterization activities. The test samples provide an independent means to assess NDA measurement system performance and compliance per criteria delineated in the NDA PDP Plan. General inter-comparison of NDA measurement system performance among DOE measurement facilities and commercial NDA services can also be evaluated using measurement results on similar NDA PDP test samples. A PDP test sample consists of a 55-gallon matrix drum containing a waste matrix type representative of a particular category of the DOE waste inventory and nuclear material standards of known radionuclide and isotopic composition typical of DOE radioactive material. The PDP sample components are made available to participating measurement facilities as designated by the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO). The nuclear material type, mass and associated alpha activity of the NDA PDP radioactive standard sets have been specified and fabricated to allow assembly of PDP samples that simulate TRU alpha activity concentrations, radionuclidic/isotopic distributions and physical forms typical of the DOE TRU waste inventory. The PDP matrix drum waste matrix types were derived from an evaluation of information contained in the Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report (TWBIR) to ensure representation of prevalent waste types and their associated matrix characteristics in NDA PDP testing. NDA drum analyses required by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) may only be performed by measurement facilities that comply with the performance criteria as set forth in the NDA PDP Plan. In this document, these analyses are referred to as WIPP analyses, and the wastes on which they are performed are referred to as WIPP wastes.

Carlsbad Field Office

2005-08-03T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Washington's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Contents Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district Avista Utilities Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district Washington State University Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district Itron ReliOn Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district Kettle Falls Biomass Facility

262

Determination of H{sub 2} Diffusion Rates through Various Closures on TRU Waste Bag-Out Bags  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The amount of H{sub 2} diffusion through twist and tape (horse-tail), wire tie, plastic tie, and heat sealed closures on transuranic (TRU) waste bag-out bags has been determined. H{sub 2} diffusion through wire and plastic tie closures on TRU waste bag-out bags has not been previously characterized and, as such, TRU waste drums containing bags with these closures cannot be certified and/or shipped to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Since wire ties have been used at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) from 1980 to 1991 and the plastic ties from 1991 to the present, there are currently thousands of waste drums that cannot be shipped to the WIPP site. Repackaging the waste would be prohibitively expensive. Diffusion experiments performed on the above mentioned closures show that the diffusion rates of plastic tie and horse-tail closures are greater than the accepted value presented in the TRU-PACT 11 Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Diffusion rates for wire tie closures are not statistically different from the SAR value. Thus, drums containing bags with these closures can now potentially be certified which would allow for their consequent shipment to WIPP.

Phillip D. Noll, Jr.; E. Larry Callis; Kirsten M. Norman

1999-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

Washington/Geothermal | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Washington/Geothermal < Washington Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Print PDF Washington Geothermal General Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Power Projects Under Development in Washington No geothermal projects listed. Add a geothermal project. Operational Geothermal Power Plants in Washington No geothermal power plants listed. Add a geothermal energy generation facility. Geothermal Areas in Washington Mean Capacity (MW) Number of Plants Owners Geothermal Region Baker Hot Spring Geothermal Area 22.7 MW22,700 kW 22,700,000 W 22,700,000,000 mW 0.0227 GW 2.27e-5 TW Cascades Geothermal Region

264

PacifiCorp (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington) Washington) (Redirected from Pacific Power (Washington)) Jump to: navigation, search Name PacifiCorp Place Washington Service Territory Washington Website www.pacificorp.com/index. Green Button Reference Page www.pacificpower.net/abou Green Button Implemented Yes Utility Id 14354 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. PacifiCorp consists of three business units. Pacific Power is a subsidiary of PacifiCorp which delivers electricity to customers in Oregon, Washington and California; it is headquartered in Portland, OR. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0723/kWh

265

ACCELERATING HANFORD TRANSURANC (TRU) WASTE CERTIFICATION & SHIPMENT FROM 2 PER YEAR TO 12 PER MONTH  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Department of Energy's site at Hanford has significantly accelerated the characterization of transuranic (TRU) waste and its subsequent shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)--from a total of two shipments in fiscal year 2002 to twelve shipments per month. The challenges encountered and experience gained in achieving this acceleration provide valuable lessons that can be used by others in the waste industry. Lessons learned as well as estimates of cost savings and schedule benefits are described. At the start of the acceleration effort, three separate facilities managed by multiple organizations characterized and handled the drums. To consolidate the majority of these activities under one organization and in one facility required RCRA permit and safety basis modifications. and a myriad of construction activities--but all with very visible benefit. Transferring drums between the separate facilities involved multiple organizations, and required meeting a complex set of transportation and safety basis requirements. Consolidating characterization activities into a single facility greatly simplified this process, realizing very significant operational efficiencies. Drums stockpiled in buildings for future processing previously were stored with recognition of physical, chemical, and radiological hazards, but without consideration for future processing. Drums are now stored using a modular approach so that feed for characterization processing takes drums from the accessible module face rather than randomly throughout the storage building. This approach makes drum handling more efficient, minimizes the potential for worker injuries, and supports the principles of ''as low as reasonably achievable'' (ALARA) exposure from the waste. Sampling the headspace gas of the TRU waste packages was a major bottleneck in the characterization process, and hence an obstacle to acceleration. Sampling rates were improved by a combination of insulating and heating a waste storage building to provide sufficient space for the required temperature residence time; installing filter and sample ports in the drums using a pneumatic dart method; improving gas analysis time using cryofocusing technology and using both onsite and offsite labs for redundancy of analysis capability. The need for real-time radiography was reduced by implementing avisual examination technique as the waste was being packaged. Key to implementing the visual examination technique was the use of a ''portable procedure'' that can be used anywhere on the Hanford Site. This approach has been used successfully for packaging newly generated waste from various decontamination and decommissioning projects. Using a glovebox for repackaging drums has also been a rate-limiting step in accelerating the characterization of TRU waste at Hanford. The impacts of this requirement, however, have been minimized in two ways: first, by venting certain heat-sealed bags, and second, by implementing hydrogen and methane testing of headspace gas for high gram drums with multiple layers of confinement. The details of these specific efforts are included in a separate paper. Payload assembly and loading efficiencies of the TRUPACT-II, and certification and shipment efficiencies were instrumental to Hanford's successfully accelerating shipments. Loading time of TRUPACT II's for a shipment (three TRUPACTS per shipment) went from four days to two days. Future acceleration plans include certification of a box radioassay unit to assay TRU standard waste boxes (SWB) for shipment to WIPP and adding additional payload building/loadout stations to increase the shipping capabilities.

MCDONALD, K.M.

2005-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

266

The PEACE PIPE: Recycling nuclear weapons into a TRU storage/shipping container  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes results of a contract undertaken by the National Conversion Pilot Project (NCPP) at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) to fabricate stainless steel ``pipe`` containers for use in certification testing at Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque to qualify the container for both storage of transuranic (TRU) waste at RFETS and other DOE sites and shipping of the waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP). The paper includes a description of the nearly ten-fold increase in the amount of contained plutonium enabled by the product design, the preparation and use of former nuclear weapons facilities to fabricate the components, and the rigorous quality assurance and test procedures that were employed. It also describes how stainless steel nuclear weapons components can be converted into these pipe containers, a true ``swords into plowshare`` success story.

Floyd, D.; Edstrom, C. [Manufacturing Sciences Corp. (United States); Biddle, K.; Orlowski, R. [BNFL, Inc. (United States); Geinitz, R. [Safe Sites of Colorado, Golden, CO (United States); Keenan, K. [USDOE-RFFO (United States); Rivera, M. [Science Applications International Corp./LATA (United States)

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

Systematic evaluation of options to avoid generation of noncertifiable transuranic (TRU) waste at Los Alamos National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

At present, >35% of the volume of newly generated transuranic (TRU) waste at Los Alamos National Laboratory is not certifiable for transport to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Noncertifiable waste would constitute 900--1,000 m{sup 3} of the 2,600 m{sup 3} of waste projected during the period of the Environmental Management (EM) Accelerated Cleanup: Focus on 2006 plan (DOE, 1997). Volume expansion of this waste to meet thermal limits would increase the shipped volume to {approximately}5,400 m{sup 3}. This paper presents the results of efforts to define which TRU waste streams are noncertifiable at Los Alamos, and to prioritize site-specific options to reduce the volume of certifiable waste over the period of the EM Accelerated Cleanup Plan. A team of Los Alamos TRU waste generators and waste managers reviewed historic generation rates and thermal loads and current practices to estimate the projected volume and thermal load of TRU waste streams for Fiscal Years 1999--2006. These data defined four major problem TRU waste streams. Estimates were also made of the volume expansion that would be required to meet the permissible wattages for all waste. The four waste streams defined were: (1) {sup 238}Pu-contaminated combustible waste from production of Radioactive Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) with {sup 238}Pu activity which exceeds allowable shipping limits by 10--100X. (2) {sup 241}Am-contaminated cement waste from plutonium recovery processes (nitric and hydrochloric acid recovery) are estimated to exceed thermal limits by {approximately}3X. (3) {sup 239}Pu-contaminated combustible waste, mainly organic waste materials contaminated with {sup 239}Pu and {sup 241}Am, is estimated to exceed thermal load requirements by a factor of {approximately}2X. (4) Oversized metal waste objects, (especially gloveboxes), cannot be shipped as is to WIPP because they will not fit in a standard waste box or drum.

Boak, J.M.; Kosiewicz, S.T.; Triay, I.; Gruetzmacher, K.; Montoya, A.

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

GAS-GENERATION EXPERIMENTS FOR LONG-TERM STORAGE OF TRU WASTES AT WIPP  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

An experimental investigation was conducted for gas generation in contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) wastes subjected for several years to conditions similar to those expected to occur at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) should the repository eventually become inundated with brine. Various types of actual CH-TRU wastes were placed into 12 corrosion-resistant vessels. The vessels were loosely filled with the wastes, which were submerged in synthetic brine having the same chemical composition as that in the WIPP vicinity. The vessels were also inoculated with microbes found in the Salado Formation at WIPP. The vessels were sealed, purged, and the approximately 750-ml headspace was pressurized with nitrogen gas to approximately 146 atmospheres to create anoxic conditions at the lithostatic pressure expected in the repository were it inundated. The temperature was maintained at the expected 30 C. The test program objective was to measure the quantities and species of gases generate d by metal corrosion, radiolysis, and microbial activity. These data will assist in the specification of the rates at which gases are produced under inundated repository conditions for use in the WIPP Performance Assessment computer models. These experiments were very carefully designed, constructed, instrumented, and performed. Approximately 6-1/2 years of continuous, undisturbed testing were accumulated. Several of the vessels showed significantly elevated levels of generated gases, virtually all of which was hydrogen. One vessel measured over 4.2% hydrogen, by volume. Two other vessels generated well over 1% hydrogen, and another was at nearly 1%. Only small quantities of other gases, principally carbon dioxide, were detected. Gas generation was found to depend strongly on the waste composition. The maximum hydrogen generation occurred in tests containing carbon steel. Average corrosion penetration rates in carbon-steel of up to 2.3 microns per year were deduced. Conversion of carbon to carbon dioxide was calculated to be up to 4.7 {micro}g-mol/yr/g-carbon.

Felicione, F.S.; Carney, K.P.; Dwight, C.C.; Cummings, D.G.; Foulkrod, L.E.

2003-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

269

,"Washington Natural Gas Consumption by End Use"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Consumption by End Use" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural...

270

Washington: a guide to geothermal energy development  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Washington's geothermal potential is discussed. The following topics are covered: exploration, drilling, utilization, legal and institutional setting, and economic factors of direct use projects. (MHR)

Bloomquist, R.G.; Basescu, N.; Higbee, C.; Justus, D.; Simpson, S.

1980-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

Washington Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Washington Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3...

272

,"Washington Underground Natural Gas Storage Capacity"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Capacity" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Underground Natural...

273

Washington Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Washington Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2...

274

Energy Crossroads: Utility Energy Efficiency Programs Washington...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington Energy Crossroads Index Utility Energy Efficiency Programs Index Suggest a Listing Puget Sound Energy Information for Businesses Bonneville Power Administration...

275

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - Enforcement Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Enforcement Documents Enforcement Documents Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Enforcement Letter issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies associated with the Super High-Efficiency Neutron Counter Non-Destructive Assay System Refurbishment at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, September 8, 2006 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC, related to Radiological Uptakes at the Mobile Visual Examination and Repackaging Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, December 22, 2005 (EA-2005-08) - Washington TRU Solutions, LLC - Press Release, December 22, 2005 Enforcement Letter issued to Diversified Metal Products, Inc. related to Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, October 28, 2004

276

Geophysical LaboratoryGeophysical Laboratory Carnegie Institution of WashingtonCarnegie Institution of Washington  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Washington Washington, DCWashington, DC Russell J. HemleyRussell J. Hemley Percy W. BridgmanPercy W. BridgmanGeophysical LaboratoryGeophysical Laboratory Carnegie Institution of WashingtonCarnegie Institution STATE VIBRATIONAL STATE ELECTRONIC STATE (K-edge, Band Gap) OPTICAL X-RAY · Diamond window opaque above

Hemley, Russell J.

277

Itron (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Itron Itron Address 601 Officers Row Place Vancouver, Washington Zip 98661 Sector Efficiency Product Manufactures/sells advanced meters and data collection systems Website http://www.itron.com/ Coordinates 45.627447°, -122.656794° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.627447,"lon":-122.656794,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

278

Washington, DC~ZO585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

jpfl.3%2' jpfl.3%2' ) .,Departhent of Eikrgj! : Washington, DC~ZO585 .-, , , Lf; I: ~.1,' .Yj4 , The Honorable Louis Barlup 55 ,E. Main Street Waynesboro;,Pennsy,lvania 17268 '~ Dear Mayor Barl,up:' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary has'announced' a new approach to openness,in the Department of Energy-(DOE) and its communications with the public. In support-of this initiative, we are pleased.to forward the enclosed information related to the former Landis Machine Tool Co. site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. This information:is provided for your information< use, and retention. DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identification of sites used by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their

279

Washington State biomass data book  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This is the first edition of the Washington State Biomass Databook. It assess sources and approximate costs of biomass fuels, presents a view of current users, identifies potential users in the public and private sectors, and lists prices of competing energy resources. The summary describes key from data from the categories listed above. Part 1, Biomass Supply, presents data increasing levels of detail on agricultural residues, biogas, municipal solid waste, and wood waste. Part 2, Current Industrial and Commercial Use, demonstrates how biomass is successfully being used in existing facilities as an alternative fuel source. Part 3, Potential Demand, describes potential energy-intensive public and private sector facilities. Part 4, Prices of Competing Energy Resources, shows current suppliers of electricity and natural gas and compares utility company rates. 49 refs., 43 figs., 72 tabs.

Deshaye, J.A.; Kerstetter, J.D.

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Natural Resources Building 1111 Washington St SE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

brings together all of the state's natural resource agencies and seven salmon recovery organizations-0917 STATE OF WASHINGTON (360) 902-3000 TTY: (360) 902-1996 Fax: (360) 902-3026 E-mail: Info@rco.wa.gov Web in Washington State, consistent with the state's Comprehensive Monitoring Strategy and Action Plan. The Forum

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Energy Incentive Programs, Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington Washington Energy Incentive Programs, Washington October 29, 2013 - 1:19pm Addthis Updated January 2013 Washington utilities budgeted over $180 million in 2011 to promote increased energy efficiency in the state, excluding the offerings administered by the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance and Bonneville Power Authority (see below). What public-purpose-funded energy efficiency programs are available in my state? Washington has no public-purpose-funded energy efficiency programs. What utility energy efficiency programs are available to me? Seattle City Light offers a variety of energy efficiency programs to commercial and industrial customers through its Energy Smart Services initiative: Free facility energy assessments are available to medium and large commercial customers in order to manage operating costs and identify energy

282

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 15, 2013 July 15, 2013 CX-010738: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2013 Spacer and Insulator Replacement Program; Third and Fourth Quarter Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/15/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2013 CX-010588: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chehalis Substation Tree Clearing CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 1, 2013 CX-010589: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nine Canyon Communication Tower Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 25, 2013 CX-010429: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harbour Pointe Small Generator Integration

283

Washington/Transmission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Washington/Transmission < Washington Jump to: navigation, search WashingtonTransmissionHeader.png Roadmap Agency Links Local Regulations State Regulations Summary General Transmission Dashboard Permitting Atlas Compare States Arizona California Colorado Idaho Montana Nevada New Mexico Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Resource Library NEPA Database The electrical grid in Washington is part of the Western Interconnection power grid and the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC). WECC's service territory extends from Canada to Mexico. It includes the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia, the northern portion of Baja California,

284

Radiological Survey Results for Areas A1 North, A5A, A6, and B2 at the Molycorp Washington Remediation Project, Washington, Pennsylvania  

SciTech Connect

Perform radiological surveys of the Molycorp Washington Remediation Project (MWRP) facility in Washington, Pennsylvania

W.C. Adams

2007-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

285

Final Environmental Impact Statement for Treating Transuranic (TRU)/Alpha Low-level Waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

The DOE proposes to construct, operate, and decontaminate/decommission a TRU Waste Treatment Facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The four waste types that would be treated at the proposed facility would be remote-handled TRU mixed waste sludge, liquid low-level waste associated with the sludge, contact-handled TRU/alpha low-level waste solids, and remote-handled TRU/alpha low-level waste solids. The mixed waste sludge and some of the solid waste contain metals regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and may be classified as mixed waste. This document analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with five alternatives--No Action, the Low-Temperature Drying Alternative (Preferred Alternative), the Vitrification Alternative, the Cementation Alternative, and the Treatment and Waste Storage at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Alternative.

N /A

2000-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

286

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program Assurances - Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty State Energy Program Assurances - Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty Letter from Washington D.C. Mayor Fenty providing...

287

HOLDUP MEASUREMENTS FOR THREE VISUAL EXAMINATION AND TRU REMEDIATION GLOVEBOX FACILITIES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Visual Examination (VE) gloveboxes are used to remediate transuranic waste (TRU) drums at three separate facilities at the Savannah River Site. Noncompliant items are removed before the drums undergo further characterization in preparation for shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Maintaining the flow of drums through the remediation process is critical to the program's seven-days-per-week operation. Conservative assumptions are used to ensure that glovebox contamination from this continual operation is below acceptable limits. Holdup measurements using cooled HPGe spectrometers are performed in order to confirm that these assumptions are conservative. {sup 239}Pu is the main nuclide of interest; however, {sup 241}Pu, equilibrium {sup 237}Np/{sup 233}Pa and {sup 238}Pu (if detected) are typically assayed. At the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) facility {sup 243,244,245}Cm are also generally observed and are always reported at either finite levels or at limits of detection. A complete assay at each of the three facilities includes a measure of TRU content in the gloveboxes and HEPA filters in the glovebox exhaust. This paper includes a description of the {gamma}-PHA acquisitions, of the modeling, and of the calculations of nuclide content. Because each of the remediation facilities is unique and ergonomically unfavorable to {gamma}-ray acquisitions, we have constructed custom detector support devices specific to each set of acquisitions. This paper includes a description and photographs of these custom devices. The description of modeling and calculations include determination and application of container and matrix photon energy dependent absorption factors and also determination and application of geometry factors relative to our detector calibration geometry. The paper also includes a discussion of our measurements accuracy using off-line assays of two SRNL HEPA filters. The comparison includes assay of the filters inside of 55-gallon drums using the SRNL Q{sup 2} assay system and separately using off-line assay with an acquisition configuration unique from the original in-situ acquisitions.

Dewberry, R; Donald Pak, D

2007-05-04T23:59:59.000Z

288

Safety evaluation for packaging (onsite) for the concrete-shielded RH TRU drum for the 327 Postirradiation Testing Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

This safety evaluation for packaging authorizes onsite transport of Type B quantities of radioactive material in the Concrete Shielded Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste (RH TRU) Drum per HNF-PRO-154, Responsibilities and Procedures for all Hazardous Material Shipments. The drum will be used for transport of 327 Building legacy waste from the 300 Area to a solid waste storage facility on the Hanford Site.

Smith, R.J.

1998-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

289

Washington's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7th congressional district: Energy Resources 7th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 7th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 7th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 7th congressional district ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center

290

Washington - State Energy Profile Data - U.S. Energy Information ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Western Washington (Seattle) Alternative Fuels: Washington: Share of U.S. Period: find more: Alternative Fueled Vehicles in Use : 23,563 Vehicles 2.0% 2011 ...

291

Washington Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use (Million...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File) Washington Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use (Million Cubic Feet) Washington Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use...

292

National Petroleum Council Washington, DC | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Petroleum Council Washington, DC National Petroleum Council Washington, DC Remarks by Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham on the national energy plan. National Petroleum...

293

Washington, District of Columbia: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington, District of Columbia: Energy Resources (Redirected from Washington DC) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.8951118, -77.0363658...

294

Washington, District of Columbia: Energy Resources | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington, District of Columbia: Energy Resources (Redirected from Washington, DC) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 38.8951118, -77.0363658...

295

Washington - SEDS - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Washington. State Profile and Energy Estimates. ... SW, Washington, DC 20585 About EIA Press Room Careers Feedback Contact Us. Sources & Uses Petroleum Coal Natural Gas

296

Washington State Department of Transportation | Open Energy Informatio...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Department of Transportation Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington State Department of Transportation Name Washington State Department of Transportation Short Name WDOT...

297

Washington - State Energy Profile Overview - U.S. Energy ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

The Grand Coulee Dam on Washington's Columbia River is the largest hydroelectric power producer ... Washington ranked sixth in the Nation in net generation of ...

298

EIS-0492: Oregon LNG Export Project (Warrenton, OR) and Washington...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

92: Oregon LNG Export Project (Warrenton, OR) and Washington Expansion Project (between Sumas and Woodland, WA) EIS-0492: Oregon LNG Export Project (Warrenton, OR) and Washington...

299

Benton County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Benton County, Washington ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number Climate...

300

Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Asotin County, Washington ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

EA-1111: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1111: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of...

302

Energy Secretary Chu, EPA Administrator Jackson, Washington State...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

decree with Washington or invoke judicial dispute resolution proceedings under its terms. Oregon and Washington will also enter into a separate Memorandum of Agreement that...

303

Department of Energy Cites Washington Group International, Inc...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington Group International, Inc. for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Violations Department of Energy Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Radiation Protection...

304

Biological Weed Control at the Sherwood, Washington, Disposal...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services Ecosystem Management Team Biological Weed Control at the Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site Biological Weed Control at the Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site...

305

Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"TERRAIN","zoom":6,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"500px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7510741,"lon":-120.7401386,"alt":0,"address":"Washington

306

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Group International - Group International - EA-2003-07 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International - EA-2003-07 October 23, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington Group International related to Falsification of Records and Procurement Deficiencies at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the investigation conducted by the Department of Energy (DOE) into allegations that RTS Wright Industries, LLC, (RTS), a supplier for which Washington Group International (WGI) had direct contractual responsibility, had falsified quality control inspection records. These records pertained to the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Supercompactor Glovebox Suite at the Idaho

307

In-situ stabilization of TRU/mixed waste project at the INEEL  

SciTech Connect

Throughout the DOE complex, buried waste poses a threat to the environment by means of contaminant transport. Many of the sites contain buried waste that is untreated, prior to disposal, or insufficiently treated, by today`s standards. One option to remedy these disposal problems is to stabilize the waste in situ. This project was in support of the Transuranic/Mixed Buried Waste - Arid Soils product line of the Landfill Focus Area, which is managed currently by the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (BNL) provided the analytical laboratory and technical support for the various stabilization activities that will be performed as part of the In Situ Stabilization of TRU/Mixed Waste project at the INEL. More specifically, BNL was involved in laboratory testing that included the evaluation of several grouting materials and their compatibility, interaction, and long-term durability/performance, following the encapsulation of various waste materials. The four grouting materials chosen by INEL were: TECT 1, a two component, high density cementious grout, WAXFIX, a two component, molten wax product, Carbray 100, a two component elastomeric epoxy, and phosphate cement, a two component ceramic. A simulated waste stream comprised of sodium nitrate, Canola oil, and INEL soil was used in this study. Seven performance and durability tests were conducted on grout/waste specimens: compressive strength, wet-dry cycling, thermal analysis, base immersion, solvent immersion, hydraulic conductivity, and accelerated leach testing.

Milian, L.W.; Heiser, J.H.; Adams, J.W.; Rutenkroeger, S.P.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

LWR First Recycle of TRU with Thorium Oxide for Transmutation and Cross Sections  

SciTech Connect

Thorium has been considered as an option to uranium-based fuel, based on considerations of resource utilization (thorium is approximately three times more plentiful than uranium) and as a result of concerns about proliferation and waste management (e.g. reduced production of plutonium, etc.). Since the average composition of natural Thorium is dominated (100%) by the fertile isotope Th-232, Thorium is only useful as a resource for breeding new fissile materials, in this case U-233. Consequently a certain amount of fissile material must be present at the start-up of the reactor in order to guarantee its operation. The thorium fuel can be used in both once-through and recycle options, and in both fast and thermal spectrum systems. The present study has been aimed by the necessity of investigating the option of using reprocessed plutonium/TRU, from a once-through reference LEU scenario (50 GWd/ tIHM), mixed with natural thorium and the need of collect data (mass fractions, cross-sections etc.) for this particular fuel cycle scenario. As previously pointed out, the fissile plutonium is needed to guarantee the operation of the reactor. Four different scenarios have been considered: Thorium recycled Plutonium; Thorium recycled Plutonium/Neptunium; Thorium recycled Plutonium/Neptunium/Americium; Thorium recycled Transuranic. The calculations have been performed with SCALE6.1-TRITON.

Andrea Alfonsi; Gilles Youinou; Sonat Sen

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

LWR First Recycle of TRU with Thorium Oxide for Transmutation and Cross Sections  

SciTech Connect

Thorium has been considered as an option to uranium-based fuel, based on considerations of resource utilization (thorium is approximately three times more plentiful than uranium) and as a result of concerns about proliferation and waste management (e.g. reduced production of plutonium, etc.). Since the average composition of natural Thorium is dominated (100%) by the fertile isotope Th-232, Thorium is only useful as a resource for breeding new fissile materials, in this case U-233. Consequently a certain amount of fissile material must be present at the start-up of the reactor in order to guarantee its operation. The thorium fuel can be used in both once-through and recycle options, and in both fast and thermal spectrum systems. The present study has been aimed by the necessity of investigating the option of using reprocessed plutonium/TRU, from a once-through reference LEU scenario (50 GWd/ tIHM), mixed with natural thorium and the need of collect data (mass fractions, cross-sections etc.) for this particular fuel cycle scenario. As previously pointed out, the fissile plutonium is needed to guarantee the operation of the reactor. Four different scenarios have been considered: Thorium recycled Plutonium; Thorium recycled Plutonium/Neptunium; Thorium recycled Plutonium/Neptunium/Americium; Thorium recycled Transuranic. The calculations have been performed with SCALE6.1-TRITON.

Andrea Alfonsi; Gilles Youinou

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

A computer model of gas generation and transport within TRU waste drums  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A computer model has been developed to predict radiolytic gas generation and transport within Transuranic (TRU) waste drums and surrounding enclosures. Gas generation from the radiolytic decomposition of organic material contaminated with plutonium is modeled and the concentrations of gas throughout the waste drum and enclosures are determined using a diffusional transport model. The model accurately reproduces experimentally measured gas concentrations. With polyethylene waste in unvented drums, the model predicts that the concentration of hydrogen gas can exceed 4 mole percent (lower flammable limit) with only about 5 curies of plutonium. If the drum liner is punctured and an unrestricted 0.75-in. carbon composite filter vent is installed in the drum lid, the plutonium loading can be increased to 240 Ci without generating flammable gas mixtures. Larger diameter filters can be used to increase the curie loading. The model has been used to show that shipments of 1000 Ci of plutonium-238 contaminated waste from Savannah River to the WIPP site are feasible using the TRUPACT shipping container. 10 refs., 17 figs., 6 tabs.

Smith, F.G. III

1988-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Kootenai Electric Cooperative (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Cooperative (Washington) Cooperative (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Kootenai Electric Cooperative Place Washington Utility Id 10454 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates No Rates Available The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for Kootenai Electric Cooperative (Washington). Month RES REV (THOUSAND $) RES SALES (MWH) RES CONS COM REV (THOUSAND $) COM SALES (MWH) COM CONS IND_REV (THOUSAND $) IND SALES (MWH) IND CONS OTH REV (THOUSAND $) OTH SALES (MWH) OTH CONS TOT REV (THOUSAND $) TOT SALES (MWH) TOT CONS

312

Good Energies (Washington DC) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Energies (Washington DC) Energies (Washington DC) Name Good Energies (Washington DC) Address 1250 24th St., NW, Suite 250 Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20037 Product Global investor in renewable energy and energy efficiency industries Year founded 2001 Phone number (202) 747-2550 Website http://www.goodenergies.com/ Coordinates 38.90649°, -77.051534° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.90649,"lon":-77.051534,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

313

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 21, 2012 May 21, 2012 CX-008716: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Tacoma Power Chehalis- Covington 230-Kilovolt (kV) Line/Convert Microwave Signals From Analog To Digital CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration May 18, 2012 CX-009096: Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Customs and Border Protection Non-Intrusive Inspection Tests CX(s) Applied: B3.10, B3.11 Date: 05/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Pacific Northwest Site Office May 17, 2012 CX-008717: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation of Wood Poles on Centralia B Street No. 1 for Proposed Centralia City Light May Street Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/17/2012

314

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 7, 2013 January 7, 2013 CX-009785: Categorical Exclusion Determination Roosevelt Radio Station Emergency Generator Removal and Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 3, 2013 CX-010563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest National Laboratory- Non-Wire Methods for Transmission Congestion Management Through Predictive Simulation and Optimization CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/03/2013 Location(s): Washington, North Carolina, Illinois, Oregon Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy December 27, 2012 CX-009699: Categorical Exclusion Determination Continuation of Yakama Nation Sturgeon Management Project CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 12/27/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington

315

Northern Lights, Inc (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lights, Inc (Washington) Lights, Inc (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Northern Lights, Inc Place Washington Utility Id 13758 References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File2_2010[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0982/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File2_2010" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Lights,_Inc_(Washington)&oldid=412730" Categories: EIA Utility Companies and Aliases Utility Companies Organizations Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version

316

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 4, 2011 April 4, 2011 CX-005572: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Washington-Tribe-Cowlitz Indian Tribe CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/04/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 30, 2011 CX-005577: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation for the Purchase of the Ninemile Creek Property Date: 03/30/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 27, 2011 CX-005474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Charging Stations - Willis D. Tucker Park CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/14/2011 Location(s): Snohomish, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

317

Map Locating Berkeley Lab Washington, DC Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE Map LEGEND: A:Berkeley Lab DC Office; PNNL; NREL; ORNL | B: EPA Waterside Mall C: Metrorail Station: Smithsonian | D: Metrorail Station: L'Enfant Plaza Notice: Due to security requirements in the building, all visitors to the Berkeley Lab DC Projects Office must check in at the ground floor entrance. If you do not have a DOE access badge, you will need to obtain a building visitor badge. To expedite this process, visitors are encouraged to RSVP to their meeting host or call (202) 488-2250 ahead of time. Metal detectors and x-ray screening of personal items are required for all visitors and staff entering the building. Directions to the Lab's Washington, DC Projects Office 901 D Street, SW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20024 Phone/Fax: (202) 488-2250

318

2013 Washington Auto Show | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 Washington Auto Show 2013 Washington Auto Show 2013 Washington Auto Show Addthis 1 of 10 While at the Washington Auto Show, Energy Secretary Steven Chu visited Nissan to see the 2013 Leaf. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:50 2 of 10 The new Nissan Leaf is being built at the company's Smyrna, Tennessee, Vehicle Assembly Plant -- helping to cut the price of its electric vehicle. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:49 3 of 10 Energy Secretary Steven Chu discusses the features of the 2014 Cadillac ELR -- the luxury car built built on the same powertrain platform as the Chevy Volt. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:57 4 of 10 Energy Secretary Steven Chu discusses some of the features of the Chevy

319

Washington/Wind Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington/Wind Resources Washington/Wind Resources < Washington Jump to: navigation, search Print PDF Print Full Version WIND ENERGY STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT & OUTREACHSmall Wind Guidebook Home OpenEI Home >> Wind >> Small Wind Guidebook >> Washington Wind Resources WindTurbine-icon.png Small Wind Guidebook * Introduction * First, How Can I Make My Home More Energy Efficient? * Is Wind Energy Practical for Me? * What Size Wind Turbine Do I Need? * What Are the Basic Parts of a Small Wind Electric System? * What Do Wind Systems Cost? * Where Can I Find Installation and Maintenance Support? * How Much Energy Will My System Generate? * Is There Enough Wind on My Site? * How Do I Choose the Best Site for My Wind Turbine? * Can I Connect My System to the Utility Grid?

320

PacifiCorp (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Washington Service Territory Washington Website www.pacificorp.com/index. Green Button Reference Page www.pacificpower.net/abou Green Button Implemented Yes Utility Id 14354 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. PacifiCorp consists of three business units. Pacific Power is a subsidiary of PacifiCorp which delivers electricity to customers in Oregon, Washington and California; it is headquartered in Portland, OR. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0723/kWh Commercial: $0.0688/kWh Industrial: $0.0571/kWh The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for PacifiCorp

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 5, 2013 April 5, 2013 CX-010154: Categorical Exclusion Determination Digital Communication System Upgrade Project: 'D' Analog System Retirement and #WC SONET Ring CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/05/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010094: Categorical Exclusion Determination Activity-Specific Categorical Exclusion for Deep Borehole Drilling, Sampling, and Characterization for the Proposed Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco, Washington to the Hanford Site 200 East Area CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington

322

BLM Washington Office | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bureau of Land Management Address 1849 C Street NW, Rm. 5665 Place Washington, DC Zip 20240 Phone number 202-208-3801 Website http:www.blm.govwostenin References...

323

BEF - Solar Starters (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Solar Cooperative have made a five-year purchase commitment for Green Tags from new small solar installations throughout Oregon and Washington. Systems of up to 5 kW will be...

324

Washington Gas- Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Washington Gas provides a number of rebates to residential customers who utilize energy efficient equipment and measures in the home. Rebate are available for tankless water heaters, storage (tank)...

325

The Mount Washington Observatory50 Years Old  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Mount Washington Observatory celebrates its 50th Anniversary this year. The history of the establishment and of the early days of the Observatory is summarized, and its research programs, instrumentation, and facilities from the early days to ...

Alan A. Smith

1982-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 2011 July 7, 2011 CX-006111: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-Tribe-Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 7, 2011 CX-006262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Walla Walla County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2011 CX-008688: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of equipment at Wahkiakum Public Utility District's Cathlamet Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/02/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2011 CX-008011: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install EMSL Super-Computer Power Infrastructure

327

MODIFICATIONS TO THE WIPP PANEL CLOSURE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Methods Assessment for Run-of-Mine Salt Panel Closures, Interim Report For Scenario 1 Testing, Washington TRU Solutions, Carlsbad New Mexico. Appendix 1-A 1-A-54 of 100 Panel...

328

Media Contacts:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Susan Scott Washington TRU Solutions (575) 234-7204 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Waste Isolation Pilot Plant P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221...

329

Recovery Act State Memos Washington, DC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington, DC Washington, DC For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION TABLE.............................................................................. 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................... 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY ............................................................................................. 5

330

Workshop on Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Markets and Challenges Renaissance Washington Hotel, Washington, DC  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Workshop on Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Markets and Challenges Renaissance Washington Hotel Berkeley National Laboratory Paul Douglas, California Public Utilities Commission Paul Helgeson, Wisconsin

331

Washington: Washington's Clean Energy Resources and Economy (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This document highlights the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's investments and impacts in the state of Washington.

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

A First Order Method for Finding Minimal Norm-Like Solutions of ...  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization. Kluwer, Boston, 2004. [12] A. N. Tikhonov and V. Y. Arsenin. Solution of Ill-Posed Problems. Washington, DC:.

333

Energy Matters in Washington State Page 1 Energy Matters  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Matters in Washington State ­ Page 1 Energy Matters in Washington State June 2008 Updated November 2009 Updated and Revised October 2013 Grand Coulee Dam #12;Energy Matters in Washington State ­ Page 2 Copyright © 2013 Washington State University Energy Program. 905 Plum Street SE, P.O. Box 43169

Collins, Gary S.

334

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Washington Points of Washington Points of Contact to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Points of Contact The following people or agencies can help you find more information about Washington's clean transportation laws, incentives, and funding

335

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Washington Laws and Washington Laws and Incentives to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives Listed below are incentives, laws, and regulations related to alternative fuels and advanced vehicles for Washington. Your Clean Cities coordinator

336

Solvent extraction and recovery of the transuranic elements from waste solutions using the TRUEX process  

SciTech Connect

High-level liquid waste is produced during the processing of irradiated nuclear fuel by the PUREX process. In some cases the treatment of metallurgical scrap to recover the plutonium values also generates a nitric acid waste solution. Both waste solutions contain sufficient concentrations of transuranic elements (mostly /sup 241/Am) to require handling and disposal as a TRU waste. This paper describes a recently developed solvent extraction/recovery process called TRUEX (transuranium extraction) which is designed to reduce the TRU concentration in nitric waste solutions to <100 nCi/g of disposed form (1,2). (In the USA, non-TRU waste is defined as <100 nCi of TRU/g of disposed form.) The process utilizes PUREX process solvent (TBP in a normal paraffinic hydrocarbon or carbon tetrachloride) modified by a small concentration of octyl(phenyl)-N,N-diisobutylcarbamoylmethylphosphine oxide (abbrev. CMPO). The presence of CMPO enables the modified PUREX process solvent to extract trivalent actinides as well as tetra- and hexavalent actinides. A major feature of the TRUEX process is that is is applicable to waste solutions containing a wide range of nitric acid, salt, and fission product concentrations and at the same time is very compatible with existing liquid-liquid extraction technology as usually practiced in a fuel reprocessing plant. To date the process has been tested on two different types of synthetic waste solutions. The first solution is a typical high-level nitric acid waste and the second a typical waste solution generated in metallurgical scrap processing. Results are discussed. 4 refs., 1 fig., 4 tabs.

Horwitz, E.P.; Schulz, W.W.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 22, 2012 June 22, 2012 CX-008692: Categorical Exclusion Determination Amendment Number 2 to the Alcoa Power Sales Agreement CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 06/22/2012 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 21, 2012 CX-008695: Categorical Exclusion Determination Munro Control Center Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008694: Categorical Exclusion Determination Acquisition and Disposition of Property CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Washington, Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008693: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Structure Replacements on the Chehalis-Centralia No. 2 115 Kilovolt Transmission Line

338

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

339

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office August 19, 2009 CX-000470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Purgewater Storage and Treatment Facility Unit #1 Closure CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/19/2009 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

340

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 25, 2010 August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Badger Canyon Substation Radio Communication Tower Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 24, 2010 CX-003613: Categorical Exclusion Determination

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 12, 2011 December 12, 2011 CX-008010: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small-Scale Research and Development Projects Using Nanoscale Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 12/12/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office December 9, 2011 CX-007481: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007479: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project

342

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 12, 2011 August 12, 2011 CX-006472: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006468: Categorical Exclusion Determination Testing Subcontractor for Fenestration System Energy Performance Rating Development and Research CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Everett, Washington

343

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 3, 2011 March 3, 2011 CX-005410: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Alcoa Number 1 and 2 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 3, 2011 CX-005409: Categorical Exclusion Determination Olympia-Grand Coulee Number 1 Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 2, 2011 CX-005379: Categorical Exclusion Determination Insulator Replacement in Agricultural Lands Along the Grand Coulee-Bell Number 3/Grand Coulee-Westside No. 1 Double Circuit 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/02/2011 Location(s): Lincoln County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

344

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 19, 2011 January 19, 2011 CX-005033: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oil Cleanup in 100-NR-2 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 19, 2011 CX-005032: Categorical Exclusion Determination Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility Ventilation System Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 13, 2011 CX-005034: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provide Power to Existing River Discharge and Monitoring System, 331 Facility, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/13/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

345

Arch Venture Partners (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arch Venture Partners (Washington) Arch Venture Partners (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Arch Venture Partners Address 1000 Second Avenue Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98104 Region Pacific Northwest Area Product Venture capital firm investing in alternative energy production Website http://www.archventure.com/ Coordinates 47.6051741°, -122.3351302° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6051741,"lon":-122.3351302,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

346

ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington) Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: ARCH Venture Partners Name ARCH Venture Partners Address 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3700 Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98104 Region Pacific Northwest Area Coordinates 47.605526°, -122.334716° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.605526,"lon":-122.334716,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

347

The George Washington University | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

The George Washington University The George Washington University Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20052 Coordinates 38.8991756°, -77.0470916° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.8991756,"lon":-77.0470916,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

348

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 5, 2010 October 5, 2010 CX-004255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Spacer Dampers Along the Chief Joseph PH-Chief Joseph Number 6 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/05/2010 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 4, 2010 CX-004076: Categorical Exclusion Determination East Omak Substation Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 10/04/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 30, 2010 CX-004116: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

349

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 28, 2010 April 28, 2010 CX-002135: Categorical Exclusion Determination Barr-Tech - Green Waste To Renewable Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/28/2010 Location(s): Sprague, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 27, 2010 CX-002236: Categorical Exclusion Determination C-Farm Electrical, Lighting, and Walkway Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B2.1, B1.3 Date: 04/27/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 23, 2010 CX-002213: Categorical Exclusion Determination Spacer replacement along the Hanford-Wautoma #1 and #2 (substation to substation) transmission lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/23/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

350

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000348: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington

351

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 21, 2011 September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 20, 2011 CX-007036: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - North Service Center CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington

352

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 14, 2011 June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 06/14/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 10, 2011 CX-006198: Categorical Exclusion Determination South Tacoma - Frederickson Power Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 06/10/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2011 CX-006197: Categorical Exclusion Determination Omak Area 3G Radio Site Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2011 Location(s): Okanogan, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 8, 2011 CX-006049: Categorical Exclusion Determination

353

The Washington State Experience Energy Code Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington State Experience Washington State Experience Residential Energy Code Compliance Gary Nordeen Senior Building Science Specialist April 4, 2013 WSU Energy Program Provides energy services, products, education and information for: * Businesses * Utilities ̶ public and private * Governments ̶ state and local * Tribes * Federal agencies * Manufacturing plants * Educational facilities * National laboratories WSU Energy Program Building Science Team * Residential energy code technical assistance * Voluntary programs, Northwest ENERGYSTAR Homes * Research and development, Building America * Community-based upgrade programs * Industry training and certifications ̶ HERS, BPI, ENERGY STAR, PTCS Staff provides building science expertise for: WSU Energy Program

354

EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts from DOEs Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to assist with funding the construction, operation, and maintenance of modifications to the Klickitat Hatchery and the Yakama Nations Hatchery Complex Program that intend to aid populations of anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams. The proposed action could include support for modifications to the existing hatchery, a new hatchery/acclimation facility in Wahkiacus, Washington, and an acclimation facility at McCreedy Creek in Yakima County, Washington.

355

Washington State Department of Ecology | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington State Department of Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology Jump to: navigation, search Name Washington State Department of Ecology Place Lacey, Washington State Zip 98503 References Washington State Department of Ecology[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Washington State Department of Ecology is an organization located in Lacey, Washington State . References ↑ "Washington State Department of Ecology" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Washington_State_Department_of_Ecology&oldid=696505" Categories: Government Agencies Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation:

356

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district 3 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 2nd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district Mercurius Biofuels LLC

357

Record of Decision on Treating Transuranic (TRU)/Alpha Low-Level Waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE/EIS-0305) (8/9/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

83 83 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 9, 2000 / Notices 1 TRU waste is waste containing alpha-emitting radionuclides with an atomic number greater than 92 and half-lives greater than 20 years, at concentrations greater than 100 nanocuries per gram of waste. 2 Alpha low-level waste is low-level waste that contains alpha-emitting isotopes. 3 Mixed waste contains radioactive waste regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and a hazardous component subject to RCRA regulation. 4 Low-level waste is any radioactive waste that is not classified as high-level waste, spent nuclear fuel, TRU waste, byproduct material, or mixed waste. 5 Remote-handled TRU/alpha low-level waste contains alpha-, beta-, and gamma-emitting isotopes with a surface dose rate greater than 200 millirem

358

Application of Robotics and X-ray Radiography to the Examination of Large Contact Handled Transuranic (TRU) Waste Containers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy, Savannah River Site is storing a large number of transuranic (TRU) waste containers that are to be shipped to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico. Radiographic examination of waste containers is required prior to shipment. This paper will discuss the TRU waste container positioning system and safety system provided by PaR Systems, Inc., Shoreview, MN, to the inspection system prime contractor, Hytec, Inc., Los Alamos, NM. Most containers will be over-packed in large metal shipping containers (TRUPACT-III). The largest containers are 2.8 m x 1.9 m x 1.9 m and weigh 5600 kg. In addition, smaller containers and drums are inspected. The containers are manipulated to view the contents from various directions. The motions of the container, X-ray source and X-ray detectors are coordinated to obtain a constant viewing area relative to the item of interest in the container. (authors)

Pe, A.S. [PaR Systems, Inc., PaR Systems Inc., Shoreview, MN (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Washington Clean Technology Alliance | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alliance Alliance Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington Clean Technology Alliance Name Washington Clean Technology Alliance Address 1301 Fifth Avenue Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98101 Region Pacific Northwest Area Year founded 2007 Phone number 206 310 1642 Website http://www.wacleantech.org/ Notes Business alliance for clean tech sectors in Washington state Coordinates 47.608714°, -122.3338038° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.608714,"lon":-122.3338038,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

360

Topographically Forced Convergence in Western Washington State  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Several times a year when the low-level winds from off the Pacific Ocean are within a narrow range of speed and direction, air passes both north and south of the Olympic Mountains of Washington State and is forced to converge in Puget Sound by ...

Clifford Mass

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Post-doctoral Fellowships University of Washington  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

syndrome RecQ helicase in human fibroblasts. Aging Cell 6: 53-61. Sharma A, Awasthi S, Harrod CK, Matlock2010 -2011 Post-doctoral Fellowships University of Washington Seattle, WA Human RecQ helicases in biology and oncology Background: Mutations in the human RecQ helicase genes, WRN, BLM and RECQL4, lead

Monnat, Ray

362

Associations between classroom CO2 concentrations and student attendance in Washington and Idaho  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ATTENDANCE IN WASHINGTON AND IDAHO Derek G. Shendell 1 ,assessments in Washington and Idaho were sponsored by annualin the states of Washington and Idaho. Study classrooms had

Shendell, Derek G.; Prill, Richard; Fisk, William J.; Apte, Michael G.; Blake, David; Faulkner, David

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

Washington International Renewable Energy Conference | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Renewable Energy Conference International Renewable Energy Conference Washington International Renewable Energy Conference March 4, 2008 - 10:52am Addthis Remarks as Prepared For Delivery by Secretary Bodman Thank you very much, Hermann, for that kind introduction. I'm quite pleased to be a part of this important conference, and I want to thank everyone who worked so hard to put it together. Renewable energy is helping us bring about a new energy future, one that is cleaner, more sustainable, more affordable, more secure and less reliant on carbon-based fossil fuels. While there is no "silver bullet" that will solve the world's energy problems, it is clear that renewable energy and efficiency technologies are an indispensable component of the solution. We must continue to aggressively pursue their development and widespread

364

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Grants to someone by E-mail Grants to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

365

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

366

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

367

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Rebates to someone by E-mail Rebates to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

368

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

369

Washington's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional

370

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

371

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Biodiesel to someone by E-mail Biodiesel to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

372

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

EVs to someone by E-mail EVs to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

373

DOE Cites Washington Closure Hanford for Safety Violations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Department of Energy issues a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to contractor Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) for violations of DOE's worker safety and health program regulations in 2009 at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State.

374

User Science Exhibition March 28-29 in Washington DC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

User Science Exhibition March 28-29 in Washington DC User Science Exhibition March 28-29 in Washington DC February 17, 2012 by Francesca Verdier (0 Comments) This March 28 and 29...

375

Washington 401 Water Quality Certification JARPA Process | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington 401 Water Quality Certification JARPA Process Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Washington 401 Water Quality...

376

Price of Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Price of Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4...

377

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

to someone by E-mail to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives Listed below are the summaries of all current Washington laws, incentives, regulations, funding opportunities, and other initiatives related to

378

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Ethanol to someone by E-mail Ethanol to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

379

Washington's 6th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 6th congressional district Inventure Chemical Technology Structural Insulated Panel Association (SIPA) Energy Generation Facilities...

380

Washington - State Energy Profile Analysis - U.S. Energy ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Typically accounting for close to three-fourths of State electricity generation, hydroelectric power dominates the electricity market in Washington.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11 - 25620 of 28,904 results. 11 - 25620 of 28,904 results. Article DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that it has decided to exercise the five year option in the Washington TRU Solutions LLC ("WTS") contract to continue managing... http://energy.gov/articles/doe-exercises-5-year-option-washington-tru-solutions-contract-operate-wipp Article Bodman Statement on President Bush's Energy Speech Washington, DC - Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today released this statement regarding President Bush's speech on energy policy: http://energy.gov/articles/bodman-statement-president-bushs-energy-speech Article DOE Cites Safety and Ecology Corp. for Violating Nuclear Safety

382

FACT SHEET: CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS CENTERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS CENTERS CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS CENTERS At the Clean Energy Ministerial in Washington, D.C. on July 19 th and 20 th , ministers launched an initiative to support developing countries in their efforts to implement clean energy policies and programs through the creation of Clean Energy Solution Centers - virtual networks of experts and world-class online tools. The initiative will initially be funded by at least US$50 million in contributions over five years, one-third of which

383

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Olympia, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0378741°, -122.9006951° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0378741,"lon":-122.9006951,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

384

Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0342629°, -122.8231915° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0342629,"lon":-122.8231915,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

385

Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4217682°, -121.972893° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4217682,"lon":-121.972893,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

386

Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5673176°, -122.6326391° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5673176,"lon":-122.6326391,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

387

Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6417664°, -122.0803998° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6417664,"lon":-122.0803998,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

388

Washington Elec Member Corp | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Elec Member Corp Washington Elec Member Corp Place Georgia Utility Id 20146 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes ISO Other Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png 1,000 Watt HPS Cobra Lighting 1,000 Watt HPS Flood Lighting 1,000 Watt MH Flood Lighting 100 Watt HPS Lighting 175 Watt MV 250 Watt HPS Lighting 250 Watt HPS Cobra Head Lighting 250 Watt HPS Flood Lighting 400 Watt HPS Cobra Head Lighting 400 Watt HPS Flood Lighting Rate-01 (RS) Residential Rate-02 (GSND) Commercial Rate-07 (GSD) Commercial Rate-08 (GS) Primary

389

Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.727043°, -122.1795689° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.727043,"lon":-122.1795689,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

390

Washington Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History Natural Gas in Storage 30,412 33,787 37,711 40,833 43,621 45,359 1990-2013

391

Notices 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11 Federal Register 11 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. Dated: June 20, 2011. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011-15859 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]

392

Milton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Milton, Washington: Energy Resources Milton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.2481558°, -122.312899° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2481558,"lon":-122.312899,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

393

Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Spokane, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6587802°, -117.4260466° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6587802,"lon":-117.4260466,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

394

Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4623237°, -121.9956724° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4623237,"lon":-121.9956724,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

395

Bonneville Power Admin (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bonneville Power Admin Bonneville Power Admin Place Washington Utility Id 1738 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Industrial: $0.0046/kWh The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for Bonneville Power Admin (Washington). Month RES REV (THOUSAND $) RES SALES (MWH) RES CONS COM REV (THOUSAND $) COM SALES (MWH) COM CONS IND_REV (THOUSAND $) IND SALES (MWH) IND CONS OTH REV (THOUSAND $) OTH SALES (MWH) OTH CONS TOT REV (THOUSAND $) TOT SALES (MWH) TOT CONS 2009-03 2,220.339 71,908.718 8 2,220.339 71,908.718 8

396

Notices 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

53 Federal Register 53 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Notices 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ''eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ''eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 2, 2013. Dated: March 15, 2013. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013-06602 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

397

Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5301011°, -122.0326191° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5301011,"lon":-122.0326191,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

398

Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5287132°, -121.8253906° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5287132,"lon":-121.8253906,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

399

Tumwater, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tumwater, Washington: Energy Resources Tumwater, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0073187°, -122.9093063° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0073187,"lon":-122.9093063,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

400

Yelm, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yelm, Washington: Energy Resources Yelm, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.9420431°, -122.6059582° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.9420431,"lon":-122.6059582,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Woodinville, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Woodinville, Washington: Energy Resources Woodinville, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7542651°, -122.1634582° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7542651,"lon":-122.1634582,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

402

Covington, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.348333°, -122.113611° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.348333,"lon":-122.113611,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

403

Tanner, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tanner, Washington: Energy Resources Tanner, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4753806°, -121.7462201° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4753806,"lon":-121.7462201,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

404

Burien, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Burien, Washington: Energy Resources Burien, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4703767°, -122.3467918° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4703767,"lon":-122.3467918,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

405

Shoreline, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Shoreline, Washington: Energy Resources Shoreline, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7556531°, -122.3415178° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7556531,"lon":-122.3415178,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

406

Skykomish, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Skykomish, Washington: Energy Resources Skykomish, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7092746°, -121.3601014° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7092746,"lon":-121.3601014,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

407

Enumclaw, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Enumclaw, Washington: Energy Resources Enumclaw, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.2042681°, -121.9915003° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2042681,"lon":-121.9915003,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

408

Renton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Renton, Washington: Energy Resources Renton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4828776°, -122.2170661° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4828776,"lon":-122.2170661,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

409

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 9, 2010 March 9, 2010 CX-001183: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Rock Creek-John Day Number 1 Spacers CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/09/2010 Location(s): Klickitat County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 3, 2010 CX-001185: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Spacer Dampers Along the Wautoma-Rock Creek Number 1 500 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Yakima County, Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 1, 2010 CX-001040: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Coalition Petroleum Reduction Project - Conversion CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

410

Eastgate, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eastgate, Washington: Energy Resources Eastgate, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5723°, -122.134912° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5723,"lon":-122.134912,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

411

Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.888155°, -122.6884595° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.888155,"lon":-122.6884595,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

412

Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7989899°, -122.8698523° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.7989899,"lon":-122.8698523,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

413

Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.1273723°, -118.3799751° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.1273723,"lon":-118.3799751,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

414

Washington, DC | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington, DC Washington, DC Last updated on 2013-08-02 Current News In December, the DC CCCB voted 7-1 to adopt the 2012 IECC. The code will now enter administrative review and legislative process with likely adoption in the second half of 2013. Commercial Residential Code Change Current Code ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 with Amendments Amendments / Additional State Code Information Based on 2008 DC Construction Code with several amendments. State Specific Research Impacts of ASHRAE 90.1-2007 for Commercial Buildings in the District of Columbia (BECP Report, Sept. 2009) Approximate Energy Efficiency Equivalent to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Effective Date 12/26/2009 Adoption Date 12/26/2008 Code Enforcement Mandatory DOE Determination ASHRAE 90.1-2007: Yes ASHRAE 90.1-2010: No DC DOE Determination Letter, May 31, 2013

415

Tukwila, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tukwila, Washington: Energy Resources Tukwila, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4739884°, -122.2609558° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4739884,"lon":-122.2609558,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

416

Newcastle, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Newcastle, Washington: Energy Resources Newcastle, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5389889°, -122.1556769° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5389889,"lon":-122.1556769,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

417

Acme, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Acme, Washington: Energy Resources Acme, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 48.7170574°, -122.2051584° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":48.7170574,"lon":-122.2051584,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

418

Pacific, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pacific, Washington: Energy Resources Pacific, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.2645452°, -122.2501201° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2645452,"lon":-122.2501201,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

419

Hatton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hatton, Washington: Energy Resources Hatton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7759744°, -118.8263881° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.7759744,"lon":-118.8263881,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

420

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0378741°, -122.9006951° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0378741,"lon":-122.9006951,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington tru solutions" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Washington Natural Gas Consumption by End Use  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Period: Monthly Annual Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 View History Volumes Delivered to Consumers

422

Riverbend, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Riverbend, Washington: Energy Resources Riverbend, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4664916°, -121.7503869° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4664916,"lon":-121.7503869,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

423

Washington Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History Natural Gas in Storage 30,412 33,787 37,711 40,833 43,621 45,359 1990-2013

424

Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Kirkland, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6814875°, -122.2087353° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6814875,"lon":-122.2087353,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

425

Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.5595702°, -120.6220123° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.5595702,"lon":-120.6220123,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

426

Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7565354°, -118.3105282° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.7565354,"lon":-118.3105282,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

427

Everett, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Everett, Washington: Energy Resources Everett, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.9789848°, -122.2020794° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.9789848,"lon":-122.2020794,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

428

Medina, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6209323°, -122.2276237° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6209323,"lon":-122.2276237,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

429

From The Washington Post's Federal Diary:  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The Washington Post's Federal Diary: The Washington Post's Federal Diary: Merit Pay in a Nuclear Test Project By Stephen Barr Friday, March 28, 2008; D04 The agency that maintains the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile is undertaking a five-year project to overhaul pay practices so it will be more competitive in hiring scientists, engineers and other professionals. Under the pilot project, the National Nuclear Security Administration will leave the government-wide pay system -- the 15-grade General Schedule -- and replace it with up to four broad salary scales, or pay bands, designed to reward the best workers based on job performance rather than length of service. Employees will be rated on the work they do and their level of accomplishment, and will earn "shares" that

430

Redmond, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Redmond, Washington: Energy Resources Redmond, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6739881°, -122.121512° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6739881,"lon":-122.121512,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

431

Ravensdale, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ravensdale, Washington: Energy Resources Ravensdale, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.3523235°, -121.9837251° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.3523235,"lon":-121.9837251,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

432

Washington Technology Center | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technology Center Technology Center Name Washington Technology Center Address 300 Fluke Hall Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98195 Region Pacific Northwest Area Coordinates 47.6537802°, -122.3013926° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6537802,"lon":-122.3013926,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

433

Kenmore, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7573202°, -122.2440148° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7573202,"lon":-122.2440148,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

434

Carnation, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Carnation, Washington: Energy Resources Carnation, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6478787°, -121.9140073° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6478787,"lon":-121.9140073,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

435

Low-temperature geothermal resources of Washington  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report presents information on the location, physical characteristics, and water chemistry of low-temperature geothermal resources in Washington. The database includes 941 thermal (>20C or 68F) wells, 34 thermal springs, lakes, and fumaroles, and 238 chemical analyses. Most thermal springs occur in the Cascade Range, and many are associated with stratovolcanoes. In contrast, 97 percent of thermal wells are located in the Columbia Basin of southeastern Washington. Some 83.5 percent are located in Adams, Benton, Franklin, Grant, Walla Walla, and Yakima Counties. Yakima County, with 259 thermal wells, has the most. Thermal wells do not seem to owe their origin to local sources of heat, such as cooling magma in the Earth`s upper crust, but to moderate to deep circulation of ground water in extensive aquifers of the Columbia River Basalt Group and interflow sedimentary deposits, under the influence of a moderately elevated (41C/km) average geothermal gradient.

Schuster, J.E. [Washington State Dept. of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA (United States). Div. of Geology and Earth Resources] [Washington State Dept. of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA (United States). Div. of Geology and Earth Resources; Bloomquist, R.G. [Washington State Energy Office, Olympia, WA (United States)] [Washington State Energy Office, Olympia, WA (United States)

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

Conservation incentives: Evaluating the Washington state experience  

SciTech Connect

In 1980, Washington state enacted one of the first laws to give utilities an explicit, monetary incentive to experiment with new types of resources. The legislature created a mechanism to encourage what were then untested resources-conservation, cogeneration, and renewables. Since then, the value of these alternative resources is much better understood, but the value of the incentive mechanisms remains controversial. This article reviews the Washington experience with its alternative resource incentives and evaluates the state's attempt to encourage utilities to try new resources. In particular, it examines whether these incentives can correct the tendency of regulation to penalize utilities that invest in energy efficiency programs. The conclusion reached here is that the existing incentives, while they may have been useful as a first effort to promote use of alternative energy, are not especially effective at countering the conservation penalties inherent in the regulatory system.

Blackmon, G. (Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA (United States))

1991-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

437

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 JAN 2 2 1982 -/ Departmznt'of Ene,rgy ATTN : Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. Mott: Enclosed is the list of contaminated'or potentially contaminated sites that I promised to send you during our recent meeting. The sites have been broken down into the followi,ng four categories: 1. Sites with known contamination that have never been 1 icensed. 2. Formerly licensed sites with known contamination. 3. Currently licensed sites that are being decontaminated prior to decoronissioning. 4. A list of formerly licensed sites that need to be visited to determine if they have been properly decontaminated prior to decommissioning.