Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington River Protection Solutions Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 September 2010 Participation in the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), participated in the review of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review for 2010. The review was conducted during the period of August 23 to September 2, 2010, and focused on six functional areas: corrective action management, work planning and control, radiological protection, environmental protection, emergency preparedness, and

2

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

3

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and close the tank farms at DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $7.1 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with options to extend it for up to five years). WRPS is a limited liability company comprised of Washington Group

4

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Solutions, Solutions, LLC - October 2011 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - October 2011 October 2011 Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations [HIAR-ORP-2011-10-26] Staff from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), in coordination with the Office of River Protection (ORP), reviewed the status and programmatic health of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) industrial hygiene program relative to the Hanford Concerns Council (HCC) Independent Review Panel (IRP) report on Chemical Vapors Industrial

5

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford Feb 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford is performing at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

6

Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 May 27, 2011 Consent Order issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC related to deficiencies in the corrective action management program, radiation control program, and sealed radioactive source accountability and control program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has completed its investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with identified deficiencies in the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) corrective action management program, radiation control program, and sealed radioactive source accountability and control program. DOE views these programs as

7

Supplemental Groundwater Remediation Technologies to Protect the Columbia River at the Hanford Site, Washington - An Update  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper provides an update on supplemental groundwater remediation technologies to protect the Columbia River at the Hanford Site in Washington State. Major groundwater contaminants at the Hanford Site are described, along with the technologies and remedial activities that will address these environmental challenges.

Thompson, K. M.; Rowley, R. B.; Petersen, Scott W.; Fruchter, Jonathan S.

2008-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

8

Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) Partnering Agreement for the DOE-EM Tank Operations Project Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) Partnering Agreement for the DOE-EM Tank Operations Project The Mission of the Office of River Protection is to safely retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the Tank Farms to protect the Columbia River. Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) Partnering Agreement for the DOE-EM Tank Operations Project More Documents & Publications 2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Office of River Protection Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01

9

River Protection.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

cc: cc: DOE/IG-0506 I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF INSPECTIONS I N S P E C T I O N O F SELECTED ASPECTS OF THE OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PROGRAM JUNE 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, DC 20585 June 14, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman /s/ Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Inspection of Selected Aspects of the Office of River Protection Performance-Based Incentive Program" BACKGROUND The Office of River Protection (ORP), which reports to the Office of Environmental Management, is responsible for remediation of the radioactive waste stored in tanks at the Hanford Site in the State of Washington. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2000, ORP established 26 performance-based contract

10

Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations, October 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ORP-2011-10-26 ORP-2011-10-26 Site: Hanford (Office of River Protection) Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations Dates of Activity : 08/16-25/2011 (Field) Final Report 10/26/2011 Report Preparer: Jim Lockridge, Certified Industrial Hygienist Activity Description/Purpose: Staff from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), in coordination with the Office of River Protection (ORP), reviewed the status and programmatic health

11

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007979: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007978: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington

12

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY This Work Plan Environmental Health and Safety, 206-543-0469 Call: or Seattle Fire Department 9-911 Radio Communication Center skylights, window cleaning. PROTECTION METHODS Specify protection methods for workers exposed to fall hazard

Wilcock, William

13

Office of River Protection (Hanford) - Enforcement Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Enforcement Documents Enforcement Documents Office of River Protection (Hanford) Enforcement Letter issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, related to a positive Unreviewed Safety Question involving the Tank Farm Waste Transfer System at the Hanford Site, (NEL-2012-01) February 28, 2012 Consent Order issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC related to deficiencies in the corrective action management program, radiation control program, and sealed radioactive source accountability and control program (NCO-2011-01) May 27, 2011 Consent Order issued to Bechtel National, Inc. for Deficiencies in Vendor Commercial Grade Dedication Processes at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project (NCO-2010-03) September 22, 2010 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Deficiencies at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford Site, December 3, 2008 (NEA-2008-04)

14

Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC  

Energy Savers [EERE]

million gallons of radioactive and mixed waste stored in 177 large, aging, underground tanks. This nuclear waste is the result of more than four decades of reactor operations and...

15

FY 2008 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary ...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

16

Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford River Corridor Contract To Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC March 23, 2005 - 10:56am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman today announced that Washington Closure, LLC has been awarded the contract to manage the clean up and remediation of the Columbia River Corridor at the Department of Energy's Hanford Reservation in the state of Washington. The five-member team includes the Washington Group International Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Inc., Eberline Services Inc., and Integrated Logistics Services Inc. The Columbia River Corridor is composed of roughly 210 square miles along the outer edge of the Hanford Site. The contract calls for cleaning up and

17

Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC March 23, 2005 - 10:56am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman today announced that Washington Closure, LLC has been awarded the contract to manage the clean up and remediation of the Columbia River Corridor at the Department of Energy's Hanford Reservation in the state of Washington. The five-member team includes the Washington Group International Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Inc., Eberline Services Inc., and Integrated Logistics Services Inc. The Columbia River Corridor is composed of roughly 210 square miles along the outer edge of the Hanford Site. The contract calls for cleaning up and

18

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2012 14, 2012 CX-009693: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009692: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009673: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington

19

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 2011 March 1, 2011 CX-005367: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project T-222 Hazardous Materials Management Emergency Response (HAMMER) Training Facility Water Main Extension for Fire Protection CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.15 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office March 1, 2011 CX-005366: Categorical Exclusion Determination Herbicide Applications Along Gravel and Paved Roads on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 31, 2011 CX-005190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project L-691, 200 West Area Sanitary Sewage Lagoon CX(s) Applied: B1.26 Date: 01/31/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

20

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 22, 2011 August 22, 2011 CX-006835: Categorical Exclusion Determination 241-T Tank Farm Debris Barrier Fence CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office August 11, 2011 CX-006490: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bat Roost Tower Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 08/11/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 28, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006092: Categorical Exclusion Determination

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National 7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC,

22

Richland/Office of River Protection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Below are compliance agreements and accompanying summaries for the Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection at the Hanford site. Settlement Agreement re: Washington v. Bodman, January 6, 2006 Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Summary Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 Summary Tank Stabilization September 30, 1999 Tank Stabilization September 30, 1999 Summary U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February 7, 1994 U.S. Federal Facility Compliance Agreement for the Hanford Site, February

23

Scenic River Protection Policy, Minnesota Wild and Scenic Rivers Act  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Scenic River Protection Policy, Minnesota Wild and Scenic Rivers Scenic River Protection Policy, Minnesota Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Minnesota) Scenic River Protection Policy, Minnesota Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Minnesota) < Back Eligibility Utility Fed. Government Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Residential Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Low-Income Residential Schools Retail Supplier Institutional Multi-Family Residential Systems Integrator Fuel Distributor Nonprofit General Public/Consumer Transportation Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Minnesota Program Type Siting and Permitting

24

River Protection Project (RPP) Project Management Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of River Protection (ORP) Project Management Plan (PMP) for the River Protection Project (RPP) describes the process for developing and operating a Waste Treatment Complex (WTC) to clean up Hanford Site tank waste. The Plan describes the scope of the project, the institutional setting within which the project must be completed, and the management processes and structure planned for implementation. The Plan is written from the perspective of the ORP as the taxpayers' representative. The Hanford Site, in southeastern Washington State, has one of the largest concentrations of radioactive waste in the world, as a result of producing plutonium for national defense for more than 40 years. Approximately 53 million gallons of waste stored in 177 aging underground tanks represent major environmental, social, and political challenges for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). These challenges require numerous interfaces with state and federal environmental officials, Tribal Nations, stakeholders, Congress, and the US Department of Energy-Headquarters (DOE-HQ). The cleanup of the Site's tank waste is a national issue with the potential for environmental and economic impacts to the region and the nation.

NAVARRO, J.E.

2001-03-07T23:59:59.000Z

25

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2012 5, 2012 CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety

26

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations HIAR-ORP-2011-10-26 This Independent Activity...

27

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington River...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

million gallons of radioactive and mixed waste stored in 177 large, aging, underground tanks. This nuclear waste is the result of more than four decades of reactor operations and...

28

CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System...

29

CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A...

30

CRAD, Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD,...

31

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Office of River Protection...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste...

32

CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section...

33

RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT SYSTEM PLAN  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection (ORP) manages the River Protection Project (RPP). The RPP mission is to retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the tank farms to protect the Columbia River. As a result, ORP is responsible for the retrieval, treatment, and disposal of approximately 57 million gallons 1 of radioactive waste contained in the Hanford Site waste tanks and closure2 of all the tanks and associated facilities. The previous revision of the System Plan was issued in May 2008. ORP has made a number of changes to the tank waste treatment strategy and plans since the last revision of this document, and additional changes are under consideration. ORP has contracts in place to implement the strategy for completion of the mission and establish the capability to complete the overall mission. The current strategl involves a number of interrelated activities. ORP will reduce risk to the environment posed by tank wastes by the following: (1) Retrieving the waste from the single-shell tanks (SST) to double-shell tanks (DST) and delivering the waste to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). (2) Constructing and operating the WTP, which will safely treat all of the high-level waste (HLW) fraction contained in the tank farms. About one-third of the low-activity waste (LAW) fraction separated from the HLW fraction in the WTP will be immobilized in the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility. (3) Developing and deploying supplemental treatment capability assumed to be a second LAW vitrification facility that can safely treat about two-thirds of the LAW contained in the tank farms. (4) Developing and deploying supplemental pretreatment capability currently assumed to be an Aluminum Removal Facility (ARF) using a lithium hydrotalcite process to mitigate sodium management issues. (5) Developing and deploying treatment and packaging capability for contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) tank waste for possible shipment to and disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico. (6) Deploying interim storage capacity for the immobilized high-level waste (IHLW) pending determination of the final disposal pathway. (7) Closing the SST and DST tank farms, ancillary facilities, and all associated waste management and treatment facilities. (8) Optimizing the overall mission by resolution of technical and programmatic uncertainties, configuring the tank farms to provide a steady, well-balanced feed to the WTP, and performing trade-offs of the required amount and type of supplemental treatment and of the amount of HLW glass versus LAW glass. ORP has made and continues to make modifications to the WTP contract as needed to improve projected plant performance and address known or emerging risks. Key elements needed to implement the strategy described above are included within the scope of the Tank Operations Contract (TOC). Interim stabilization of the SSTs was completed in March 2004. As of April 2009, retrieval of seven SSTs has been completed and retrieval of four additional SSTs has been completed to the limits of technology. Demonstration of supplemental LAW treatment technologies has stopped temporarily pending revision of mission need requirements. Award of a new contract for tank operations (TOC), the ongoing tank waste retrieval experience, HLW disposal issues, and uncertainties in waste feed delivery and waste treatment led to the revision of the Performance Measurement Baseline (PM B), which is currently under review prior to approval. 6 This System Plan is aligned with the current WTP schedule, with hot commissioning beginning in 2018, and full operations beginning in late 2019. Major decisions regarding the use of supplemental treatment and the associated technology, the ultimate needed capacity, and its relationship to the WTP have not yet been finalized. This System Plan assumes that the outcome of these decisions will be to provide a second LAW vitrification facility. No final implementation decisions regarding supplemental technology can be made until the Tank Closure and

CERTA PJ; KIRKBRIDE RA; HOHL TM; EMPEY PA; WELLS MN

2009-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

34

RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT SYSTEM PLAN  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection (ORP) manages the River Protection Project (RPP). The RPP mission is to retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the tank farms to protect the Columbia River. As a result, the ORP is responsible for the retrieval, treatment, and disposal of the approximately 57 million gallons of radioactive waste contained in the Hanford Site waste tanks and closure of all the tanks and associated facilities. The previous revision of the System Plan was issued in September 2003. ORP has approved a number of changes to the tank waste treatment strategy and plans since the last revision of this document, and additional changes are under consideration. The ORP has established contracts to implement this strategy to establish a basic capability to complete the overall mission. The current strategy for completion of the mission uses a number of interrelated activities. The ORP will reduce risk to the environment posed by tank wastes by: (1) Retrieving the waste from the single-shell tanks (SST) to double-shell tanks (DST) for treatment and disposal; (2) Constructing and operating the WTP, which will safely treat all of the high-level waste (HLW) and about half of the low-activity waste (LAW) contained in the tank farms, and maximizing its capability and capacity; (3) Developing and deploying supplemental treatment capability or a second WTP LAW Facility that can safely treat about half of the LAW contained in the tank farms; (4) Developing and deploying treatment and packaging capability for transuranic (TRU) tank waste for shipment to and disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP); (5) Deploying interim storage capacity for the immobilized HLW and shipping that waste to Yucca Mountain for disposal; (6) Operating the Integrated Disposal Facility for the disposal of immobilized LAW, along with the associated secondary waste, (7) Closing the SST and DST tank farms, ancillary facilities, and al1 waste management and treatment facilities, (8) Developing and implementing technical solutions to mitigate the impact from substantial1y increased estimates of Na added during the pretreatment of the tank waste solids, This involves a combination of: (1) refining or modifying the flowsheet to reduce the required amount of additional sodium, (2) increasing the overall LAW vitrification capacity, (3) increasing the incorporation of sodium into the LAW glass, or (4) accepting an increase in mission duration, ORP has made and continues to make modifications to the WTP contract as needed to improve projected plant performance and address known or emerging risks, Key elements of the implementation of this strategy are included within the scope of the Tank Operations Contract, currently in procurement Since 2003, the ORP has conducted over 30 design oversight assessments of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The estimated cost at completion has increased and the schedule for construction and commissioning of the WTP has extended, The DOE, Office of Environmental Management (EM), sanctioned a comprehensive review of the WTP flowsheet, focusing on throughput. In 2005, the TFC completed interim stabilization of the SSTs and as of March 2007, has completed the retrieval of seven selected SSTs. Demonstration of supplemental treatment technologies continues. The ongoing tank waste retrieval experience, progress with supplemental treatment technologies, and changes in WTP schedule led to the FY 2007 TFC baseline submittal in November 2006. The TFC baseline submittal was developed before the WTP schedule was fully understood and approved by ORP, and therefore reflects an earlier start date for the WTP facilities. This System Plan is aligned with the current WTP schedule with hot commissioning beginning in 2018 and full operations beginning in 2019. Major decisions regarding the use of supplemental treatment and the associated technology, the ultimate needed capacity, and its relationship to the WTP have not yet been finalized. This System Plan assumes that the outcome of

CERTA PJ

2008-07-10T23:59:59.000Z

35

Contractor Fee Payments- Office of River Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Office of River Protection on these charts.

36

Pecos River Watershed Protection Plan Update  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that connects the pump, distribution tank and holding ponds. As of April 15, 2013, three of the ponds were completed and have been lined with a synthetic liner to prevent seepage and leakage as this was a major problem in early projects. Pecos River WPP...Pecos River Watershed Protection Plan Update Funding Provided by the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board through a Clean Water Act 319(h) Nonpoint Source Grant from the U.S Environmental Protection Agency TR-447 October 2013 Pecos River...

Gregory, L.; Hauck, L.; Blumenthal, B.; Brown, M.; Porter, A.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 14, 2012 December 14, 2012 CX-009689: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009672: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Relocation of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009671: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Demolition and Disposal of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012

38

River Protection Project (RPP) Project Management Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in accordance with the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999, established the Office of River Protection (ORP) to successfully execute and manage the River Protection Project (RPP), formerly known as the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS). The mission of the RPP is to store, retrieve, treat, and dispose of the highly radioactive Hanford tank waste in an environmentally sound, safe, and cost-effective manner. The team shown in Figure 1-1 is accomplishing the project. The ORP is providing the management and integration of the project; the Tank Farm Contractor (TFC) is responsible for providing tank waste storage, retrieval, and disposal; and the Privatization Contractor (PC) is responsible for providing tank waste treatment.

SEEMAN, S.E.

2000-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection - Office of River Protection - May 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May 2013 May 2013 Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection [HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the Hanford Tank Farms, and observe tank waste retrieval operations. Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May

40

CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection K Basin Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Emergency Management program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) Partnering Agreement for the DOE-EM Tank Operations Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Mission of the Office of River Protection is to safely retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the Tank Farms to protect the Columbia River.

42

River Protection Project (RPP) Environmental Program Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Program Plan was developed in support of the Integrated Environment, Safety, and Health Management System Plan (ISMS) (RPP-MP-003), which establishes a single, defined environmental, safety, and health management system that integrates requirements into the work planning and execution processes to protect workers, the public, and the environment. The ISMS also provides mechanisms for increasing worker involvement in work planning, including hazard and environmental impact identification, analysis, and control; work execution; and feedback/improvement processes. The ISMS plan consists of six core functions. Each section of this plan describes the activities of the River Protection Project (RPP) (formerly known as the Tank Waste Remediation System) Environmental organization according to the following core functions: Establish Environmental Policy; Define the Scope of Work; Identify Hazards, Environmental Impacts, and Requirements; Analyze Hazards and Environmental Impacts and Implement Controls; Perform Work within Controls; and Provide Feedback and Continuous Improvement.

POWELL, P.A.

2000-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

43

Washington State Department of Transportation Bridge Maintenance and Inspection Guidance for Protected Terrestrial Species  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Washington StateCode, Chapter 77.15 RCW. The MBTA is administered by theis more stringent that the MBTA, as it protects empty nests,

Carey, Marion

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste Treatment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection Waste Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms - February 2013 Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms - February 2013 February 2013 Site Familiarization and Introduction of New Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Site Lead for the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms [HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25] The Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) assigned a new Site Lead to provide continuous oversight of activities at the Office of River Protection (ORP) Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) and tank farms. To gain familiarity with the site programs and personnel, the new Site Lead made two trips to the site, which included tours of the WTP construction site

45

Assessment of Salmonids and their Habitat Conditions in the Walla Walla River Basin within Washington, 2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Concerns about the decline of native salmon and trout populations have increased among natural resource managers and the public in recent years. As a result, a multitude of initiatives have been implemented at the local, state, and federal government levels. These initiatives include management plans and actions intended to protect and restore salmonid fishes and their habitats. In 1998 bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) were listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), as ''Threatened'', for the Walla Walla River and its tributaries. Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were listed as ''Threatened'' in 1999 for the mid-Columbia River and its tributaries. These ESA listings emphasize the need for information about these threatened salmonid populations and their habitats. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) is entrusted with ''the preservation, protection, and perpetuation of fish and wildlife....[and to] maximize public recreational or commercial opportunities without impairing the supply of fish and wildlife (WAC 77.12.010).'' In consideration of this mandate, the WDFW submitted a proposal in December 1997 to the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for a study to assess salmonid distribution, relative abundance, genetics, and the condition of salmonid habitats in the Walla Walla River basin. The primary purposes of this project are to collect baseline biological and habitat data, to identify major data gaps, and to draw conclusions whenever possible. The study reported herein details the findings of the 2001 field season (March to November, 2001).

Mendel, Glen Wesley; Trump, Jeremy; Karl, David

2002-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

46

Massachusetts Rivers Protection Act (Massachusetts) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rivers Protection Act (Massachusetts) Rivers Protection Act (Massachusetts) Massachusetts Rivers Protection Act (Massachusetts) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Massachusetts Program Type Environmental Regulations Provider Department of Environmental Protection The law creates a 200-foot riverfront area that extends on both sides of

47

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006064: Categorical Exclusion Determination Actions to Conserve Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006089: Categorical Exclusion Determination

48

Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington , DC 20585 September 20, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY AND PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM : SUBJECT: PAULBOSCO~~ - SENIOR PROCUhM~ OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOSEPH F. WADDELL SENIOR PROCUREMENT NNSA OFFICE OF ACQ SITION MANAGEMENT Acquisition Savings Reporting Template Guidance The Department is continuing to make progress in its efforts to support the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acquisition Savings Initiative, as well as the Department's Strategic Sourcing Program. After using our current reporting template for the past year, it was a good time to review the process and make adjustments where necessary. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has also noted in an audit that

49

Wekiva River and Wekiva Parkway Protection Acts (Florida) | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Wekiva River and Wekiva Parkway Protection Acts (Florida) Wekiva River and Wekiva Parkway Protection Acts (Florida) Wekiva River and Wekiva Parkway Protection Acts (Florida) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Developer Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Florida Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider

50

DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Plateau. The scope of the tank operations contract includes base operations of the tanks, analytical laboratory support, single-shell tank retrieval and closure, Waste...

51

Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

LLC - NCO-2011-01 More Documents & Publications Consent Order, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - NCO-2010-04 Consent Order, URS Energy & Construction, Inc. - NCO-2011-02...

52

River Protection Project information systems assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Information Systems Assessment Report documents the results from assessing the Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) Hanford Data Integrator 2000 (HANDI 2000) system, Business Management System (BMS) and Work Management System phases (WMS), with respect to the System Engineering Capability Assessment Model (CAM). The assessment was performed in accordance with the expectations stated in the fiscal year (FY) 1999 Performance Agreement 7.1.1, item (2) which reads, ''Provide an assessment report on the selected Integrated Information System by July 31, 1999.'' This report assesses the BMS and WMS as implemented and planned for the River Protection Project (RPP). The systems implementation is being performed under the PHMC HANDI 2000 information system project. The project began in FY 1998 with the BMS, proceeded in FY 1999 with the Master Equipment List portion of the WMS, and will continue the WMS implementation as funding provides. This report constitutes an interim quality assessment providing information necessary for planning RPP's information systems activities. To avoid confusion, HANDI 2000 will be used when referring to the entire system, encompassing both the BMS and WMS. A graphical depiction of the system is shown in Figure 2-1 of this report.

JOHNSON, A.L.

1999-07-28T23:59:59.000Z

53

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

AND RADIATION R. Paul Detwiler, Acting Manager Carlsbad Field Office U.S.Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221-3090 Dear Dr. Detwiler: The U.S. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency (EPA) received

54

Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection - April 2011 April 2011 Hanford Tank Farms Unreviewed Safety Question Process Review [HIAR-HORP-2011-04-18] The purpose of the activity, which was performed by the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) as part of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of River Protection's (ORP's) nuclear safety assessment and oversight, was to review and evaluate selected aspects of the Tank Farms Operating Contractor's (TOC's) implementation of the recently revised unreviewed safety question (USQ) procedure. A major aspect of the revised implemented process (Ref. 1) was to eliminate unnecessary screening and to streamline the USQ process by defining facility and procedure changes that are outside

55

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

May 2013 May 2013 Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and...

56

Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Lead for the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25 The Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) Office of Safety and...

57

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SUBJECT: Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination FROM: Stephen D presents clarifying guidance for establishing protective cleanup levels1 for radioactive contamination stated in this memorandum are inclusive of all radioactive contaminants of concern at a site including

58

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C. 20460  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to update the environmental protection standards for uranium mining because current regulations, promulgated monitoring networks at ISL uranium mines, including wells within the production area to compare post- and pre preliminary framework of considerations applicable to groundwater monitoring at ISL uranium mines

59

Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington River Protection Solutions OAS-M-15-01 January 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of...

60

Recommendation for Supplemental Technologies for Hanford River Protection Project Potential Mission Acceleration (RPP-11838)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In May of 2002, the River Protection Project at Hanford proposed as part of the accelerated cleanup for the entire Hanford Site to ''accelerate waste stabilization by developing and deploying alternative treatment and immobilization solutions that are aligned with the waste characteristics to add assurance that overall waste treatment/immobilization will be completed 20 or more years sooner.'' This paper addresses one of these elements: development of recommendations for the supplemental technologies that have the greatest potential to supplement the River Protection Project's new Waste Treatment Plant throughput and achieve completion of waste processing by 2028. Low-activity waste treatment in the Waste Treatment Plant needs either to be enhanced or supplemented to enable the full amount of low-activity feed in the single-shell and double-shell tanks to be processed by 2028. The supplemental technologies are considered for low-activity waste feed that represents the maximum effectiveness of treatment compared with Waste Treatment Plant processing. During the Spring of 2002, over two dozen candidate technologies were assessed by staff from the U.S Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters, Hanford Office of River Protection, representatives from the Washington State Department of Ecology and Region 10 of the Environmental Protection Agency, staff from many national laboratories, as well as contractor and independent experts.

Allen, D. I.; Raymond, R. E.; CH2M Hill Hanford Group; Brouns, T. M.; Choho, A. F.; Numatec Hanford Corporation; Mauss, B. M.

2003-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 Site: HANFORD - Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Operational Awareness at the Office of River Protection Dates of Activity : 05/13-23/2013 Report Preparer: Robert. E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the

62

Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 Site: HANFORD - Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Operational Awareness at the Office of River Protection Dates of Activity : 05/13-23/2013 Report Preparer: Robert. E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the

63

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 2011 20, 2011 CX-006817: Categorical Exclusion Determination McNary-Ross No. 1 Upgrade Project, Surface Impairment Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Klickitat and Clark Counties, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 19, 2011 CX-006840: Categorical Exclusion Determination Security Barrier Relocation at the 618-11 Burial Grounds CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office September 19, 2011 CX-006839: Categorical Exclusion Determination Training Exercises and Simulations on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 16, 2011

64

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States » Washington United States » Washington Washington December 24, 2013 The concrete "core" is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Office of River Protection's (ORP) mission continues: to retrieve, treat and dispose of the 56 million gallons of radioactive and chemical waste stored in large, underground tanks. In 2013, ORP maintained steady progress toward the successful completion of its mission. December 24, 2013 Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record

65

Washington,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DC 20585 December 20, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT FROM: William S. Maharay Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act" Audit Report No.: OAS-L-06-04 We reviewed selected aspects of the Department.of Energy's (Department) implementation of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982. FMFIA requires that agencies establish management control and financial systems to provide reasonable assurance that the integrity of Federal programs and operations is protected. Furthermore, it requires that the head of the agency provide an annual assurance statement on whether the agency has met this

66

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 19, 2011 January 19, 2011 CX-005033: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oil Cleanup in 100-NR-2 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 19, 2011 CX-005032: Categorical Exclusion Determination Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility Ventilation System Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 13, 2011 CX-005034: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provide Power to Existing River Discharge and Monitoring System, 331 Facility, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/13/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

67

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2011 2, 2011 EA-1858: Mitigation Action Plan Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project May 1, 2011 EA-1679: Preliminary Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Powerplant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington April 28, 2011 CX-005892: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia River Inter-Tidal Fish Commission Use of White Bluffs Boat Launch and Hanford Town Boat Ramp for Salmon Tagging CX(s) Applied: B3.8 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 26, 2011 CX-005891: Categorical Exclusion Determination 200 Area Tank Farm Interim Surface Barriers CX(s) Applied: B6.9 Date: 04/26/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington

68

The Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Quality Assurance Project Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory researchers are working on the Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Project. This project is a U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management-funded initiative designed to develop new methods, strategies, and technologies for characterizing, modeling, remediating, and monitoring soils and groundwater contaminated with metals, radionuclides, and chlorinated organics. This Quality Assurance Project Plan provides the quality assurance requirements and processes that will be followed by the Technologies Project staff.

Fix, N. J.

2008-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

69

CRAD, Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Management at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge

70

Page 1 of 5 NWPPC. 1992. Response to comments: 1992 protected areas rulemaking (92-26; Supp. A). Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of small. run-of-the-river hydro project. (Agency will probably support.) Methow ;Basin tributaries. Add protected for resident fish and wildlife to unprotected. Submitted by Nooksack River Hydro. Reason: project area not important for species of concern. If approved, this change would allow construction of hydro

71

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Office of River Protection K Basin  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection K Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Environment, Safety and Health program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

72

CRAD, Training - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Training - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Environment, Safety and Health program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Training - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge

73

CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection K Basin Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Office of River Protection, K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Office of River Protection K Basin

74

CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Engineering program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge

75

Washington State Department of Transportation Bridge Maintenance and Inspection Guidance for Protected Terrestrial Species  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and addressing Migratory Bird Treaty Act issues. Chapter 5the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Washington

Carey, Marion

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16, 2010 16, 2010 CX-003457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sidewall Coring of Single-Shell Tank 241-A-106 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.11 Date: 08/16/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office August 13, 2010 CX-004960: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boeing Research and Technology -Low-Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/13/2010 Location(s): Kent, Washington Office(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy August 12, 2010 CX-003624: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replacement of Twenty 22-L Structures on the Satsop-Aberdeen Number 2 230-kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/12/2010 Location(s): Gray's Harbor County, Washington

77

HYDROGEOMORPHIC CLASSIFICATION OF WASHINGTON STATE RIVERS TO SUPPORT EMERGING ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Seattle, Washington, USA b National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration, Northwest Fishery Sciences C. P. KONRADe,f and H. IMAKIb a School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington INTRODUCTION Societal dependence on freshwater ecosystems is increasing worldwide as growing human populations

Olden, Julian D.

78

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 1, 2012 February 1, 2012 CX-007984: Categorical Exclusion Determination Explosives Research Capability Expansion, 300 Area, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 30, 2012 CX-007955: Categorical Exclusion Determination Exe-Guard (Formerly Whitelist) Antivirus Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.2, B1.7 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 27, 2012 CX-007880: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evergreen State Solar Partnership CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar

79

The Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Office of River Protection Office of Science  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Office of River Protection Office of Science Plateau;HANFORDSMALLBUSINESSCOUNCIL Richland Operations Office Sally A. Sieracki Small Business Program Manager E-mail: sally.sieracki@rl.doe.gov Web Site: www.hanford.gov/rl Office of River Protection Susan C. Johnson Small Business Program

80

Bull Trout Population Assessment in the White Salmon and Klickitat Rivers, Columbia River Gorge, Washington, 2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We utilized night snorkeling and single pass electroshocking to determine the presence or absence of bull trout Salvelinus confluentus in 26 stream reaches (3,415 m) in the White Salmon basin and in 71 stream reaches (9,005 m) in the Klickitat River basin during summer and fall 2001. We did not find any bull trout in the White Salmon River basin. In the Klickitat River basin, bull trout were found only in the West Fork Klickitat River drainage. We found bull trout in two streams not previously reported: Two Lakes Stream and an unnamed tributary to Fish Lake Stream (WRIA code number 30-0550). We attempted to capture downstream migrant bull trout in the West Fork Klickitat River by fishing a 1.5-m rotary screw trap at RM 4.3 from July 23 through October 17. Although we caught other salmonids, no bull trout were captured. The greatest limiting factor for bull trout in the West Fork Klickitat River is likely the small amount of available habitat resulting in a low total abundance, and the isolation of the population. Many of the streams are fragmented by natural falls, which are partial or complete barriers to upstream fish movement. To date, we have not been able to confirm that the occasional bull trout observed in the mainstem Klickitat River are migrating upstream into the West Fork Klickitat River.

Thiesfeld, Steven L.; McPeak, Ronald H.; McNamara, Brian S. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife); Honanie, Isadore (Confederated Tribes and Bands, Yakama Nation)

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington Closure Hanford VPP Report- March 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Washington Closure Hanford, LLC is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

82

The Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Quality Assurance Project Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has conducted interim groundwater remedial activities on the Hanford Site since the mid-1990s for several groundwater contamination plumes. DOE established the Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Project (Technologies Project) in 2006 to evaluate alternative treatment technologies. The objectives for the technology project are as follows: develop a 300 Area polyphosphate treatability test to immobilize uranium, design and test infiltration of a phosphate/apatite technology for Sr-90 at 100-N, perform carbon tetrachloride and chloroform attenuation parameter studies, perform vadose zone chromium characterization and geochemistry studies, perform in situ biostimulation of chromium studies for a reducing barrier at 100-D, and perform a treatability test for phytoremediation for Sr-90 at 100-N. This document provides the quality assurance guidelines that will be followed by the Technologies Project. This Quality Assurance Project Plan is based on the quality assurance requirements of DOE Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance, and 10 CFR 830, Subpart A--Quality Assurance Requirements as delineated in Pacific Northwest National Laboratorys Standards-Based Management System. In addition, the technology project is subject to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA/240/B-01/003, QA/R-5). The Hanford Analytical Services Quality Assurance Requirements Documents (HASQARD, DOE/RL-96-68) apply to portions of this project and to the subcontractors. HASQARD requirements are discussed within applicable sections of this plan.

Fix, N. J.

2007-01-10T23:59:59.000Z

83

The River Corridor Closure Contract How Washington Closure Hanford is Closing A Unique Department of Energy Project - 12425  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Cleanup of the Hanford River Corridor has been one of Hanford Site's top priorities since the early 1990's. This urgency is due to the proximity of hundreds of waste sites to the Columbia River and the groundwater that continues to threaten the Columbia River. In April 2005, the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) awarded the Hanford River Corridor Closure Contract (RCCC), a cost-plus incentive-fee closure contract with a 2015 end date and first of its kind at Hanford Site, to Washington Closure Hanford (WCH), a limited-liability company owned by URS, Bechtel National, and CH2M HILL. WCH is a single-purpose company whose goal is to safely, compliantly, and efficiently accelerate cleanup in the Hanford River Corridor and reduce or eliminate future obligations to DOE-RL for maintaining long-term stewardship over the site. Accelerated performance of the work-scope while keeping a perspective on contract completion presents challenges that require proactive strategies to support the remaining work-scope through the end of the RCCC. This paper outlines the processes to address the challenges of completing work-scope while planning for contract termination. WCH is responsible for cleanup of the River Corridor 569.8 km{sup 2} (220 mi{sup 2}) of the 1,517.7 km{sup 2} (586 mi{sup 2}) Hanford Site's footprint reduction. At the end of calendar year 2011, WCH's closure implementation is well underway. Fieldwork is complete in three of the largest areas within the RCCC scope (Segments 1, 2, and 3), approximately 44.5% of the River Corridor (Figure 3). Working together, DOE-RL and WCH are in the process of completing the 'paper work' that will document the completion of the work-scope and allow DOE-RL to relieve WCH of contractual responsibilities and transition the completed areas to the Long-Term Stewardship Program, pending final action RODs. Within the next 4 years, WCH will continue to complete cleanup of the River Corridor following the completion goals. As field work-scope is completed, progressive reductions of business processes, physical facilities, and staff will occur. Organizations will collapse and flatten commensurate with workload. WCH employees will move on to new endeavors, proud of their accomplishments and the legacy they are leaving behind as being the first and largest environmental cleanup closure contract at Hanford. (authors)

Feist, E.T. [Washington Closure Hanford, 2620 Fermi Avenue, Richland, WA 99354 (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 21, 2011 September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 20, 2011 CX-007036: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - North Service Center CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington

85

Office of River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives One-Year Extension Office of River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives One-Year Extension December 19, 2012 - 10:33am Addthis Richland - - The Energy Department's Office of River Protection announced the contract for Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International Inc. (ATL) has been extended for a second one-year option. ATL, a women-owned small business, will continue to provide analytical services and testing work at the Hanford Site 222-S Laboratory through January 2, 2014. "ORP values ATL's performance and commitment to safety," said Ellen Mattlin, Tank Farm Programs Division Director. "DOE appreciates the technical and management capabilities demonstrated by the ATL workforce."

86

Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms- February 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Site Familiarization and Introduction of New Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Site Lead for the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms [HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25

87

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-007504: Categorical Exclusion Determination 300 Area Nanoscale Research and Development Projects CX(s) Applied: B3.15, A9, B3.6 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 1, 2011 EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Power plant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington November 18, 2011 Demolition Begins on Hanford's Historic Plutonium Vaults - Plutonium Finishing Plant on track to meet regulatory milestone RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) began demolishing a vault complex that once held stores of plutonium for the U.S. nuclear weapons

88

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 13, 2012 September 13, 2012 HAMMER Celebrates 15th Anniversary: Dedicates New U.S. State Department Field Exercise Building RICHLAND, Wash. - The Volpentest HAMMER Training Center, located at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state, will mark its 15th anniversary of operations and dedicate a new Field Exercise Building for the U.S. State Department's counterterrorism efforts. September 6, 2012 Retrieval of Ninth Single-Shell Tank Complete Richland - Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) has completed the retrieval of radioactive and chemical waste from single-shell tank (SST) C-104, an underground storage tank that once held 259,000 gallons of waste left over from nuclear weapons production at Hanford. WRPS is the tank

89

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 22, 2011 CX-006255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indian Cabin Road Repair Date: 06/22/2011 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

90

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-006068: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 14, 2011 Massive Cement Pour into Hanford Site Nuclear Facility Underway: Recovery Act Funding Puts U Canyon in Home Stretch of Demolition Preparations RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford workers are pouring enough cement-like material to fill six Olympic-size swimming pools in one of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) largest nuclear facilities at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State to prepare the massive building for demolition. June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2

91

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Site- May 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether the Savannah River Site is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

92

Hydrodynamic Modeling Analysis of Union Slough Restoration Project in Snohomish River, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A modeling study was conducted to evaluate additional project design scenarios at the Union Slough restoration/mitigation site during low tide and to provide recommendations for finish-grade elevations to achieve desired drainage. This was accomplished using the Snohomish River hydrodynamic model developed previously by PNNL.

Yang, Zhaoqing; Wang, Taiping

2010-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

93

Channel change and ooding, Skokomish River, Washington S.C. Stover*, D.R. Montgomery1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-1694(00)00421-2 * Corresponding author. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Tel. Keywords: Land use; Sediment transport; Channel geometry; Floods; Rivers; Olympic Peninsula 1. Introduction.: 11-303- 735-5032; fax: 11-303-492-2606. E-mail addresses: stovers@ucsu.colorado.edu (S.C. Stover

Montgomery, David R.

94

VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM ONSITE REVIEW, Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington February 26- March 2, 2001  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Teams evaluation of Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington during the period of February 26 - March 2, 2001, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the companys continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

95

Water Quality Sampling Locations Along the Shoreline of the Columbia River, Hanford Site, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As environmental monitoring evolved on the Hanford Site, several different conventions were used to name or describe location information for various sampling sites along the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River. These methods range from handwritten descriptions in field notebooks to the use of modern electronic surveying equipment, such as Global Positioning System receivers. These diverse methods resulted in inconsistent archiving of analytical results in various electronic databases and published reports because of multiple names being used for the same site and inaccurate position data. This document provides listings of sampling sites that are associated with groundwater and river water sampling. The report identifies names and locations for sites associated with sampling: (a) near-river groundwater using aquifer sampling tubes; (b) riverbank springs and springs areas; (c) pore water collected from riverbed sediment; and (d) Columbia River water. Included in the listings are historical names used for a particular site and the best available geographic coordinates for the site, as of 2009. In an effort to create more consistency in the descriptive names used for water quality sampling sites, a naming convention is proposed in this document. The convention assumes that a unique identifier is assigned to each site that is monitored and that this identifier serves electronic database management requirements. The descriptive name is assigned for the convenience of the subsequent data user. As the historical database is used more intensively, this document may be revised as a consequence of discovering potential errors and also because of a need to gain consensus on the proposed naming convention for some water quality monitoring sites.

Peterson, Robert E.; Patton, Gregory W.

2009-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

96

Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The concrete “core” is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. The concrete "core" is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. A composite image of dozens of individual-frame photos taken inside Tank C-110 provides a rare panoramic view of its interior. Portions of the tank floor and the Foldtrack waste-retrieval system are clearly visible. A composite image of dozens of individual-frame photos taken inside Tank C-110 provides a rare panoramic view of its interior. Portions of the tank floor and the Foldtrack waste-retrieval system are clearly visible.

97

Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The concrete “core” is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. The concrete "core" is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. A composite image of dozens of individual-frame photos taken inside Tank C-110 provides a rare panoramic view of its interior. Portions of the tank floor and the Foldtrack waste-retrieval system are clearly visible. A composite image of dozens of individual-frame photos taken inside Tank C-110 provides a rare panoramic view of its interior. Portions of the tank floor and the Foldtrack waste-retrieval system are clearly visible.

98

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 2003 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2003, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 23 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS]) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2003, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by the NOAA Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve juvenile fish passage conditions. (4) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well greased and operative. (5) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites.

Vucelick, J.; McMichael, G.; Chamness, M. (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Assessment of Salmonids and Their Habitat Conditions in the Walla Walla River Basin within Washington, Annual Report 2002-2003.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This study began in 1998 to assess salmonid distribution, relative abundance, genetics, and the condition of salmonid habitats in the Walla Walla River basin. Stream flows in the Walla Walla Basin continue to show a general trend that begins with a sharp decline in discharge in late June, followed by low summer flows and then an increase in discharge in fall and winter. Manual stream flow measurements at Pepper bridge showed an increase in 2002 of 110-185% from July-September, over flows from 2001. This increase is apparently associated with a 2000 settlement agreement between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the irrigation districts to leave minimum flows in the river. Stream temperatures in the Walla Walla basin were similar to those in 2001. Upper montane tributaries maintained maximum summer temperatures below 65 F, while sites in mid and lower Touchet and Walla Walla rivers frequently had daily maximum temperatures well above 68 F (high enough to inhibit migration in adult and juvenile salmonids, and to sharply reduce survival of their embryos and fry). These high temperatures are possibly the most critical physiological barrier to salmonids in the Walla Walla basin, but other factors (available water, turbidity or sediment deposition, cover, lack of pools, etc.) also play a part in salmonid survival, migration, and breeding success. The increased flows in the Walla Walla, due to the 2000 settlement agreement, have not shown consistent improvements to stream temperatures. Rainbow/steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) trout represent the most common salmonid in the basin. Densities of Rainbow/steelhead in the Walla Walla River from the Washington/Oregon stateline to Mojonnier Rd. dropped slightly from 2001, but are still considerably higher than before the 2000 settlement agreement. Other salmonids including; bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), and brown trout (Salmo trutta) had low densities, and limited distribution throughout the basin. A large return of adult spring chinook to the Touchet River drainage in 2001 produced higher densities of juvenile chinook in 2002 than have been seen in recent years, especially in the Wolf Fork. The adult return in 2002 was substantially less than what was seen in 2001. Due to poor water conditions and trouble getting personnel hired, spawning surveys were limited in 2002. Surveyors found only one redd in four Walla Walla River tributaries (Cottonwood Ck., East Little Walla Walla, West Little Walla Walla, and Mill Ck.), and 59 redds in Touchet River tributaries (10 in the North Fork Touchet, 30 in the South Fork Touchet, and 19 in the Wolf Fork). Bull trout spawning surveys in the upper Touchet River tributaries found a total of 125 redds and 150 live fish (92 redds and 75 fish in the Wolf Fork, 2 redds and 1 fish in the Burnt Fork, 0 redds and 1 fish in the South Fork Touchet, 29 redds and 71 fish in the North Fork Touchet, and 2 redds and 2 fish in Lewis Ck.). A preliminary steelhead genetics analysis was completed as part of this project. Results indicate differences between naturally produced steelhead and those produced in the hatchery. There were also apparent genetic differences among the naturally produced fish from different areas of the basin. Detailed results are reported in Bumgarner et al. 2003. Recommendations for assessment activities in 2003 included: (1) continue to monitor the Walla Walla River (focusing from the stateline to McDonald Rd.), the Mill Ck system, and the Little Walla Walla System. (2) reevaluate Whiskey Ck. for abundance and distribution of salmonids, and Lewis Ck. for bull trout density and distribution. (3) select or develop a habitat survey protocol and begin to conduct habitat inventory and assessment surveys. (4) summarize bull trout data for Mill Ck, South Fork Touchet, and Lewis Ck. (5) begin to evaluate temperature and flow data to assess if the habitat conditions exist for spring chinook in the Touchet River.

Mendel, Glen; Trump, Jeremy; Gembala, Mike

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower complexes on large rivers in Eastern Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Water bodies, such as freshwater lakes, are known to be net emitters of carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4). In recent years, significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from tropical, boreal, and mid-latitude reservoirs have been reported. At a time when hydropower is increasing worldwide, better understanding of seasonal and regional variation in GHG emissions is needed in order to develop a predictive understanding of such fluxes within man-made impoundments. We examined power-producing dam complexes within xeric temperate locations in the northwestern United States. Sampling environments on the Snake (Lower Monumental Dam Complex) and Columbia Rivers (Priest Rapids Dam Complex) included tributary, mainstem, embayment, forebay, and tailrace areas during winter and summer 2012. At each sampling location, GHG measurement pathways included surface gas flux, degassing as water passed through dams during power generation, ebullition within littoral embayments, and direct sampling of hyporheic pore-water. Measurements were also carried out in a free-flowing reach of the Columbia River to estimate unaltered conditions. Surface flux resulted in very low emissions, with reservoirs acting as a sink for CO2 (up to 262 mg m-2 d-1, which is within the range previously reported for similarly located reservoirs). Surface flux of methane remained below 1 mg CH4 m-2d-1, a value well below fluxes reported previously for temperate reservoirs. Water passing through hydroelectric projects acted as a sink for CO2 during winter and a small source during summer, with mean degassing fluxes of 117 and 4.5 t CO2 d-1, respectively. Degassing of CH4 was minimal, with mean fluxes of 3.1 10-6 and 5.6 10-4 t CH4 d-1 during winter and summer, respectively. Gas flux due to ebullition was greater in coves located within reservoirs than in coves within the free flowing Hanford Reachand CH4 flux exceeded that of CO2. Methane emissions varied widely across sampling locations, ranging from 10.5 to 1039 mg CH4 m-2 d-1, with mean fluxes of 324 mg CH4 m-2 d-1in Lower Monumental Dam reservoir and 482 mg CH4 m-2d-1 in the Priest Rapids Dam reservoir. The magnitude of methane flux due to ebullition was unexpectedly high, and falls within the range recently reported for other temperate reservoirs around the world, further suggesting that this methane source should be considered in estimates of global greenhouse gas emissions. Methane flux from sediment pore-water within littoral embayments averaged 4.2 mg m-2 d-1 during winter and 8.1 mg m-2 d-1 during summer, with a peak flux of 19.8 mg m-2d-1 (at the same location where CH4 ebullition was also the greatest). Carbon dioxide flux from sediment pore-water averaged approximately 80 mg m-2d-1 with little difference between winter and summer. Similar to emissions from ebullition, flux from sediment pore-water was higher in reservoirs than in the free flowing reach.

Arntzen, Evan V.; Miller, Benjamin L.; O'Toole, Amanda C.; Niehus, Sara E.; Richmond, Marshall C.

2013-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Office of River Protection Looks Back on 2014 Achievements, Including Tank Retrieval Progress  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. In 2014, EMs Office of River Protection (ORP) marked several accomplishments at the Hanford site, including continuing efforts to resolve remaining technical issues with the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP); restarting operations of the 242-A Evaporator; establishing waste acceptance limits for WTP; and continuing progress in waste tank retrievals.

102

CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Environment, Safety and Health program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System.

103

CRAD, Engineering- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Engineering program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System.

104

CRAD, Training- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Environment, Safety and Health program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System.

105

CRAD, Emergency Management- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Emergency Management program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System.

106

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Office of River Protection, K Basin Sludge Waste System.

107

EIS-0120: Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection, Savannah River Plant, Aiken, South Carolina  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy has prepared this environmental impact statement to assess the environmental consequences of the implementation of modified waste management activities for hazardous, low-level radioactive, and mixed wastes for the protection of groundwater, human health, and the environment at its Savannah River Plant in Aiken, South Carolina.

108

EIS-0120: Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection, Savannah River Plant, Aiken, SC  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy has prepared this environmental impact statement to assess the environmental consequences of the implementation of modified waste management activities for hazardous, low-level radioactive, and mixed wastes for the protection of groundwater, human health, and the environment at its Savannah River Plant in Aiken, South Carolina.

109

Office of River Protection Waste Treatment and Immobilizatin Project Construction Site, Nov. 16-18, 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tour and Review of the Office of River Tour and Review of the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project Construction Site, November 16-18, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an orientation visit on November 16-18, 2010, at the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Immobilization Project (WTP) at the Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site. The purposes of the visit were to plan and coordinate future HSS oversight activities and to review corrective actions to the most recent HSS review at WTP. The WTP is an industrial complex for separating and vitrifying millions of gallons of radioactive and chemical waste stored at the Hanford site. The WTP complex consists of five major

110

Final Environmental Impact Statement Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection Savannah River Plant Aiken, South Carolina  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Els-o120 Els-o120 Final Environmental Impact Statement I Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection Savannah River Plant Aiken, South Carolina of Energy 1 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTIVITY: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Waste Management I TC Activities for Groundwater Protection at the Savannah River Plant, Aiken, South Carolina. CONTACT: ABSTRACT: Additional information concerning this Statement can be obtained from: Mr. S. R. Wright Director, Environmental Division U.S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office Post Office Box A Aiken, South Carolina 29802 (803) 725-3957 I TC For general information on the Department of Energy qs EIS process contact: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health U.S. Department of Energy Attn: Ms. Carol Bergstrom (EH-25) Acting Director, Office of

111

Department of Energy - Washington  

112

Savannah River Site Environmental Implementation Plan. Volume 2, Protection programs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Formal sitewide environmental planning at the . Savannah River Site (SRS) began in 1986 with the development and adoption of the Strategic Environmental Plan. The Strategic Environmental Plan describes the philosophy, policy, and overall program direction of environmental programs for the operation of the SRS. The Strategic Environmental Plan (Volume 2) provided the basis for development of the Environmental Implementation Plan (EIP). The EIP is the detailed, comprehensive environmental master plan for operating contractor organizations at the SRS. The EIP provides a process to ensure that all environmental requirements and obligations are being met by setting specific measurable goals and objectives and strategies for implementation. The plan is the basis for justification of site manpower and funding requests for environmental projects and programs over a five-year planning period.

Not Available

1989-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 25, 2010 January 25, 2010 EIS-0391: Updated Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 13, 2010 CX-000471: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Prescribed Burning on the Hanford Site During October, November, and December of 2010 to Maintain Critical Fire Breaks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 8, 2010 EIS-0391: Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 1, 2010 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan December 18, 2009 EIS-0391: Notice of Modification of Preferred Alternatives

114

Field Summary Report for Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River, Hanford Site, Washington, Collection of Surface Water, River Sediments, and Island Soils  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report has been prepared in support of the remedial investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River and describes the 2008/2009 data collection efforts. This report documents field activities associated with collection of sediment, river water, and soil in and adjacent to the Columbia River near the Hanford Site and in nearby tributaries.

L. C. Hulstrom

2009-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

115

Office of River Protection (RPP) Interface Management in the Multi Contract Project Environment at Hanford  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of River Protection (ORP) is implementing the River Protection Project (RPP) using two prime contractors. CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. (CHG) is responsible for operating the existing tank system, delivering the waste feed to the waste treatment plant, and managing the resulting low- and high-level glass waste ''product'' through a performance-based fee type contract. A separate prime contractor will be responsible for designing, constructing and commissioning of a new Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), and preparing the waste for ultimate disposal. In addition to the prime contractors and their interfaces, the River Protection Project is being conducted on the Hanford Site, which is under the management of another DOE organization, DOE Richland Field Office (DOE-RL). The infrastructure and utilities are provided by DOE-RL, for example. In addition, there are multiple other technical interfaces with federal, state and other regulatory agencies that influence the management of the activities. This paper provides an overview of the approach employed by ORP to identify, coordinate, and manage the technical interfaces of RPP. In addition, this paper describes the approach and methodologies used to: Establish an overall framework for interface management. Establish the requirements for defining and managing interfaces for the prime contractors and DOE. Contractually requiring the prime contractors to control and manage the interfaces.

SHIKASHIO, L.A.

2000-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

116

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office August 19, 2009 CX-000470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Purgewater Storage and Treatment Facility Unit #1 Closure CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/19/2009 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

117

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 28, 2010 April 28, 2010 CX-002135: Categorical Exclusion Determination Barr-Tech - Green Waste To Renewable Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/28/2010 Location(s): Sprague, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 27, 2010 CX-002236: Categorical Exclusion Determination C-Farm Electrical, Lighting, and Walkway Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B2.1, B1.3 Date: 04/27/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 23, 2010 CX-002213: Categorical Exclusion Determination Spacer replacement along the Hanford-Wautoma #1 and #2 (substation to substation) transmission lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/23/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

118

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

119

The Reaches Project : Ecological and Geomorphic Dtudies Supporting Normative Flows in the Yakima River Basin, Washington, Final Report 2002.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Yakima River system historically produced robust annual runs of chinook, sockeye, chum and coho salmon and steelhead. Many different stocks or life history types existed because the physiography of the basin is diverse, ranging from very dry and hot in the high desert of the lower basin to cold and wet in the Cascade Mountains of the headwaters (Snyder and Stanford 2001). Habitat diversity and life history diversity of salmonids are closely correlated in the Yakima Basin. Moreover, habitat diversity for salmonids and many other fishes maximizes in floodplain reaches of river systems (Ward and Stanford 1995, Independent Scientific Group 2000). The flood plains of Yakima River likely were extremely important for spawning and rearing of anadromous salmonids (Snyder and Stanford 2001). However, Yakima River flood plains are substantially degraded. Primary problems are: revetments that disconnect main and side channel habitats; dewatering associated with irrigation that changes base flow conditions and degrades the shallow-water food web; chemical and thermal pollution that prevents proper maturation of eggs and juveniles; and extensive gravel mining within the floodplain reaches that has severed groundwater-channel connectivity, increased thermal loading and increased opportunities for invasions of nonnative species. The Yakima River is too altered from its natural state to allow anything close to the historical abundance and diversity of anadromous fishes. Habitat loss, overharvest and dam and reservoir passage problems in the mainstem Columbia River downstream of the Yakima, coupled with ocean productivity variation, also are implicated in the loss of Yakima fisheries. Nonetheless, in an earlier analysis, Snyder and Stanford (2001) concluded that a significant amount of physical habitat remains in the five floodplain reaches of the mainstem river because habitat-structuring floods do still occur on the remaining expanses of floodplain environment. Assuming main stem and ocean bottlenecks are not overriding, restoration of floodplain connectivity by elevating base flows throughout the corridor, removing revetments and refilling gravel pits by natural riverine transport of gravel where possible could be successful in substantially enhancing Yakima salmon and steelhead runs. Hence, the overarching purpose of this research was to determine the ecology of major floodplain reaches of the Yakima River: Cle Elum, Kittitas, Naches, Union Gap and Wapato. Specifically, the study documented groundwater-channel connectivity and flow relations; use and quality of side channel and other floodplain habitats by salmonid fishes; and classification and analysis of floodplain habitat using remote sensing and documentation of geomorphic processes, required for a robust understanding of the feasibility of revetment removal and establishment of a normative flow regime for the mainstem river.

Stanford, Jack A.; Lorang, Mark N.; Matson, Phillip L. (University of Montana, Flathead Lake Biological Station, Poison, MT)

2002-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Field Summary Report for Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Coumbia River, Hanford Site, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes field sampling activities conducted in support of WCHs Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River. This work was conducted form 2008 through 2010. The work included preliminary mapping and measurement of Hanford Site contaminants in sediment, pore water, and surface water located in areas where groundwater upwelling were found.

L.C. Hulstrom

2010-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Integrated Hatchery Operations Team: Operations Plans for Anadromous Fish Production Facilities in the Columbia River Basin, Volume IV of IV; Washington: Rocky Reach Hatchery Addendum, 1992 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Rocky Reach Hatchery is located along the Columbia Paver, just downstream from Rocky Reach Dam. Site elevation is 800 feet above sea level. The Turtle Rock Island facility, located 2 miles upstream, is operated as a satellite facility (shared with the Washington Department of Wildlife). The facility is staffed with 2.75 FTE`S. The hatchery was originally designed as a mile-long spawning channel at Turtle Rock Island. Rearing units consist of eight vinyl raceways at Rocky Reach and four rearing ponds at Turtle Rock. Water rights are held by Chelan County PUD and total 3,613 gpm from the Columbia River. Water available for use in the Turtle Rock rearing ponds averages 12,000 gpm from the Columbia River. Rocky Reach Hatchery and the Turtle Rock satellite facility are owned by Chelan County PUD. They are operated as mitigation facilities for the fishery impacts caused by the construction and operation of Rocky Reach Dam. Rocky Reach Hatchery is used for incubation and early rearing of upriver bright (URB) fall chinook. Fingerlings are later transferred to the Turtle Rock facility for final rearing and release.

Peck, Larry

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

Determination of Swimming Speeds and Energetic Demands of Upriver Migrating Fall Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha) in the Klickitat River, Washington.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes a study conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the Bonneville Power Administration's Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program during the fall of 2001. The objective was to study the migration and energy use of adult fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) traveling up the Klickitat River to spawn. The salmon were tagged with either surgically implanted electromyogram (EMG) transmitters or gastrically implanted coded transmitters and were monitored with mobile and stationary receivers. Swim speed and aerobic and anaerobic energy use were determined for the fish as they attempted passage of three waterfalls on the lower Klickitat River and as they traversed free-flowing stretches between, below, and above the falls. Of the 35 EMG-tagged fish released near the mouth of the Klickitat River, 40% passed the first falls, 24% passed the second falls, and 20% made it to Lyle Falls. None of the EMG-tagged fish were able to pass Lyle Falls, either over the falls or via a fishway at Lyle Falls. Mean swimming speeds ranged from as low as 52.6 centimeters per second (cm s{sup -1}) between falls to as high as 189 (cm s{sup -1}) at falls passage. Fish swam above critical swimming speeds while passing the falls more often than while swimming between the falls (58.9% versus 1.7% of the transmitter signals). However, fish expended more energy swimming the stretches between the falls than during actual falls passage (100.7 to 128.2 kilocalories [kcals] to traverse areas between or below falls versus 0.3 to 1.0 kcals to pass falls). Relationships between sex, length, and time of day on the success of falls passage were also examined. Average swimming speeds were highest during the day in all areas except at some waterfalls. There was no apparent relationship between either fish condition or length and successful passage of waterfalls in the lower Klickitat River. Female fall chinook salmon, however, had a much lower likelihood of passing waterfalls than males. The study also examined energy costs and swimming speeds for fish released above Lyle Falls as they migrated to upstream spawning areas. This journey averaged 15.93 days to travel a mean maximum of 37.6 km upstream at a total energy cost of approx 3,971 kcals (34% anaerobic and 66% aerobic) for a sample of five fish. A bioenergetics example was run, which estimated that fall chinook salmon would expend an estimated 1,208 kcal to pass from the mouth of the Columbia River to Bonneville Dam and 874 kcals to pass Bonneville Dam and pool and the three falls on the Lower Klickitat River, plus an additional 2,770 kcals above the falls to reach the spawning grounds, leaving them with approximately 18% (1,089 kcals) of their original energy reserves for spawning. Results of the bioenergetics example suggest that a delay of 9 to 11 days along the lower Klickitat River may deplete their remaining energy reserves (at a rate of about 105 kcal d{sup -1}) resulting in death before spawning would occur.

Brown, Richard S.; Geist, David R.; Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington

2002-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

123

Final Environmental Impact Statement Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection Savannah River Plant Aiken, South Carolina  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I I I Y DoE/Els-o120 Final Environmental Impact Statement Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection Savannah River Plant Aiken, South Carolina Volume 2 Q ~<$c'% ~ v ~ g ;:: # +4 -~ STATES O* December 1987 United States Department of Energy -- TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.1 Geology and Seismology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.1.l Regional Geologic Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . A.1.1.1 Tectonic Provinces . . . . . . . . . . . A.I.1.2 Stratigraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.1.1.3 Geomorphology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.1.2 Seismology and Geologic Hazards . . . . . . . . . A.1.2.1 Geologic Structures and Seismicity . . . A.1.2.2 Seismic Events and Liquefaction Potentill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.2 Groundwater Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.2.1 Hydrostratigraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.2.2 Groundwater Hydrology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.2.2.1 Hydrologic Properties

124

Final Environmental Impact Statement Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection Savannah River Plant Aiken, South Carolina  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Impact Impact \ DoE/Els-o120 Statement Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection Savannah River Plant Aiken, South Carolina Volume 3 Q ~+ ~ FNT O&@+@ &v a w ~ k ~ ;%." $ +6 & ~+e $TiTES Of December 1987 United States Department of Energy TABLE OF CONTENTS ~pendix G ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES FOR STORAGE FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . G.1 No-Action Strategy . . . . . . . . G.1.l Sununarv and Objectives . . NEW DISPOSAL/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G.1.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Effects G.1.3 Nonradioactive Atmospheric Releases . G.1.4 Ecological Effects . . . . . . . . . G.1.5 Radiological Releases . . . . . . . . G.1.6 Archaeological and Historic Resources G.1.7 SOciOecOnOmics . . . . . . . . . . . G.1.8 Dedication of Site . . . . . . . . . G.1.9 Institutional Impacts . . . . . . . . G.l.10 Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G.2 Dedication Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . G.2.1 G.2.2 G.2.3 G.2.4 G.2.5 G.2.6

125

Final Environmental Impact Statement Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection Savannah River Plant Aiken, South Carolina  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PURPOSE PURPOSE The U.S. Department of Energv SUMRY (DOE) has Dreuared this environmental impact -. . . statement (EIS) to assess the environmental consequences of the implementation of modified waste management activities for hazardous, low-level radioactive, and mixed wastes for the protection of groundwater, human health, and the environment at its Savannah River Plant (SRP) in Aiken, South Carolina. This EIS, which is both programmatic and project-specific, has been prepared in accordance with Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended. It is intended to support broad decisions on future actions on SRP waste management activities and to provide project- related environmental input and support for project-specific decisions on pro- ceeding with cleanup activities at existing waste sites in the R- and F-Areas, establishing new waste

126

Washington Phase II Fish Diversion Screen Evaluations in the Yakima River Basin, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2004, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated 25 Phase II fish screen sites in the Yakima River Basin as part of a multi-year project for the Bonneville Power Administration on the effectiveness of fish screening devices. PNNL collected data to determine whether velocities in front of the screens and in the bypasses met the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries, formerly the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)) criteria to promote safe and timely fish passage. In addition, PNNL conducted underwater video surveys to evaluate the environmental and operational conditions of the screen sites with respect to fish passage. Based on evaluations in 2004, PNNL concluded that: (1) In general, water velocity conditions at the screen sites met fish passage criteria set by NOAA Fisheries. (2) Conditions at most facilities would be expected to provide for safe juvenile fish passage. (3) Automated cleaning brushes generally functioned properly; chains and other moving parts were typically well-greased and operative. (4) Removal of sediment buildup and accumulated leafy and woody debris could be improved at some sites. (5) Conditions at some facilities indicate that operation and/or maintenance should be modified to improve passage conditions for juvenile fish. For example, Taylor has had problems meeting bypass flow and submergence operating criteria since the main river channel shifted away from the site 2 years ago, and Fruitvale consistently has had problems meeting bypass flow criteria when the water is low. (6) Continued problems at Gleed point to design flaws. This site should be considered for redesign or replacement.

Vucelick, Jessica; McMichael, Geoffrey; Chamness, Mickie [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Critical Protection Item classification for a waste processing facility at Savannah River Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes the methodology for Critical Protection Item (CPI) classification and its application to the Structures, Systems and Components (SSC) of a waste processing facility at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The WSRC methodology for CPI classification includes the evaluation of the radiological and non-radiological consequences resulting from postulated accidents at the waste processing facility and comparison of these consequences with allowable limits. The types of accidents considered include explosions and fire in the facility and postulated accidents due to natural phenomena, including earthquakes, tornadoes, and high velocity straight winds. The radiological analysis results indicate that CPIs are not required at the waste processing facility to mitigate the consequences of radiological release. The non-radiological analysis, however, shows that the Waste Storage Tank (WST) and the dike spill containment structures around the formic acid tanks in the cold chemical feed area and waste treatment area of the facility should be identified as CPIs. Accident mitigation options are provided and discussed.

Ades, M.J. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States); Garrett, R.J. [ABB Government Services, Aiken, SC (United States)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Office of River Protection Assessment of Contractor Quality Assurance and Operational Awareness at Tank Farms, June 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-HANFORD-2013-06-17 HIAR-HANFORD-2013-06-17 Site: Hanford, Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Office of River Protection (ORP) Assessment of Contractor Quality Assurance, Operational Awareness at Hanford Tank Farms Dates of Activity : June 17-20, 2013 Report Preparer: Robert E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the ORP Hanford Tank Farms, observed a Tank Farms morning meeting, toured the C Tank Farm, and observed a heavy (34,000 pound) lift. Result: Independent Oversight, together with the ORP Facility Representative, toured the C Tank Farm to observe workers setting

129

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18, 2011 18, 2011 Hanford to Host ISMS Safety Workshop in Kennewick: Abstracts Due in June for September Event RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Hanford will hold its annual DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Champions Workshop on September 12-15, 2011, at the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick, Wash. May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Final Environmental Assessment Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project, Walla Walla and Columbia Counties, Washington May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Mitigation Acton Plan Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Finding of No Significant Impact Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 13, 2011 CX-005809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

130

Seattle, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Location: Seattle, WashingtonSeed Funding: $20 millionTarget Building Types: Residential, commercial, and institutionalWebsites: www.communitypowerworks.orgwww.seattle.gov/environment/CPWmain...

131

Hanford River Protection Project Life cycle Cost Modeling Tool to Enhance Mission Planning - 13396  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Life cycle Cost Model (LCM) Tool is an overall systems model that incorporates budget, and schedule impacts for the entire life cycle of the River Protection Project (RPP) mission, and is replacing the Hanford Tank Waste Operations Simulator (HTWOS) model as the foundation of the RPP system planning process. Currently, the DOE frequently requests HTWOS simulations of alternative technical and programmatic strategies for completing the RPP mission. Analysis of technical and programmatic changes can be performed with HTWOS; however, life cycle costs and schedules were previously generated by manual transfer of time-based data from HTWOS to Primavera P6. The LCM Tool automates the preparation of life cycle costs and schedules and is needed to provide timely turnaround capability for RPP mission alternative analyses. LCM is the simulation component of the LCM Tool. The simulation component is a replacement of the HTWOS model with new capability to support life cycle cost modeling. It is currently deployed in G22, but has been designed to work in any full object-oriented language with an extensive feature set focused on networking and cross-platform compatibility. The LCM retains existing HTWOS functionality needed to support system planning and alternatives studies going forward. In addition, it incorporates new functionality, coding improvements that streamline programming and model maintenance, and capability to input/export data to/from the LCM using the LCM Database (LCMDB). The LCM Cost/Schedule (LCMCS) contains cost and schedule data and logic. The LCMCS is used to generate life cycle costs and schedules for waste retrieval and processing scenarios. It uses time-based output data from the LCM to produce the logic ties in Primavera P6 necessary for shifting activities. The LCM Tool is evolving to address the needs of decision makers who want to understand the broad spectrum of risks facing complex organizations like DOE-RPP to understand how near-term programmatic decisions affect life cycle costs and commitments. (authors)

Dunford, Gary [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, WA 99352 (United States)] [AEM Consulting, LLC, 1201 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, WA 99352 (United States); Williams, David [WIT, Inc., 11173 Oak Fern Court, San Diego, CA 92131 (United States)] [WIT, Inc., 11173 Oak Fern Court, San Diego, CA 92131 (United States); Smith, Rick [Knowledge Systems Design, Inc., 13595 Quaker Hill Cross Rd, Nevada City, CA 95959 (United States)] [Knowledge Systems Design, Inc., 13595 Quaker Hill Cross Rd, Nevada City, CA 95959 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure Project- June 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether River Corridor Closure Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

133

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite, Liquid Waste Contract Savannah River Site- February 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether the Liquid Waste Contract Savannah River Site is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

134

HANFORD SITE RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT (RPP) TRANSURANIC (TRU) TANK WASTE IDENTIFICATION & PLANNING FOR REVRIEVAL TREATMENT & EVENTUAL DISPOSAL AT WIPP  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The CH2M HILL Manford Group, Inc. (CHG) conducts business to achieve the goals of the Office of River Protection (ORP) at Hanford. As an employee owned company, CHG employees have a strong motivation to develop innovative solutions to enhance project and company performance while ensuring protection of human health and the environment. CHG is responsible to manage and perform work required to safely store, enhance readiness for waste feed delivery, and prepare for treated waste receipts for the approximately 53 million gallons of legacy mixed radioactive waste currently at the Hanford Site tank farms. Safety and environmental awareness is integrated into all activities and work is accomplished in a manner that achieves high levels of quality while protecting the environment and the safety and health of workers and the public. This paper focuses on the innovative strategy to identify, retrieve, treat, and dispose of Hanford Transuranic (TRU) tank waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP).

KRISTOFZSKI, J.G.; TEDESCHI, R.; JOHNSON, M.E.; JENNINGS, M

2006-01-18T23:59:59.000Z

135

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE 2008 TECHNICAL REVIEW  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Beginning in 2006, the US Department of Energy (DOE) supported nine applied research projects to improve the protection of the Columbia River and mitigate the impacts of Hanford Site groundwater. These projects were funded through a supplemental Congressional budget allocation, and are now in various stages of completion in accordance with the research plans. The DOE Office of Environmental Management Groundwater and Soil Cleanup Technologies (EM-22) sponsored a technical peer review meeting for these projects in Richland WA, July 28-31, 2008. The overall objective of the peer review is to provide information to support DOE decisions about the status and potential future application of the various technologies. The charge for the peer review panel was to develop recommendations for each of the nine 'technologies'. Team members for the July 2008 review were Brian Looney, Gene LeBoeuf, Dawn Kaback, Karen Skubal, Joe Rossabi, Paul Deutsch, and David Cocke. Previous project reviews were held in May 2007 and March-May of 2006. The team used the following four rating categories for projects: (a) Incorporate the technology/strategy in ongoing and future EM activities; (b) Finish existing scope of applied research and determine potential for EM activities when research program is finished; (c) Discontinue current development activities and do not incorporate technology/strategy into ongoing and future EM activities unless a significant and compelling change in potential viability is documented; and (d) Supplement original funded work to obtain the data needed to support a DOE decision to incorporate the technology into ongoing and future EM activities. The supplemental funding portfolio included two projects that addressed strontium, five projects that addressed chromium, one project that addressed uranium and one project that addressed carbon tetrachloride. The projects ranged from in situ treatment methods for immobilizing contaminants using chemical-based methods such as phosphate addition, to innovative surface treatment technologies such as electrocoagulation. Total funding for the nine projects was $9,900,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2006 and $2,000,000 in FY 2007. At the Richland meeting, the peer reviewers provided a generally neutral assessment of the projects and overall progress, and a generally positive assessment with regard to the principal investigators meeting their stated research objectives and performing the planned laboratory research and limited field work. Only one project, the Electrocoagulation Treatability Test, received a rating of 'discontinue' from the team because the project goals had not been met. Because this particular project has already ended, no action with respect to funding withdrawal is necessary. All other projects were recommended to be finished and/or incorporated into field efforts at Hanford. Specific technical comments and recommendations were provided by the team for each project.

Looney, B; Dawn S. Kaback, D; Eugene L. LeBoeuf, E; Joe Rossabi, J; Karen L. Skubal, K; David L. Cocke, D; Paul C. Deutsch, P

2008-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

136

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 15, 2013 January 15, 2013 EA-1949: FERC Draft Environmental Assessment Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA December 27, 2012 EM's Office of River Protection has successfully removed waste from a tenth storage tank at the Hanford site. Located in C Farm, C-109 is one of 16 underground tanks ranging in capacity from 55,000 to 530,000 gallons. Retrieval of Tenth Single-shell Tank Complete at Hanford's Office of River Protection RICHLAND, Wash. - The Office of River Protection (ORP) has completed retrieval of radioactive and chemical waste from the tenth underground waste storage tank at the Hanford site. December 17, 2012 CX-009746: Categorical Exclusion Determination Upstream Ultrasonic Processing for Small Producers: Preventative Maintenance for Paraffin Management

137

Scenic Rivers Act (Virginia)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Virginia Scenic Rivers Programs intent is to identify, designate and help protect rivers and streams that possess outstanding scenic, recreational, historic and natural characteristics of...

138

Maine Rivers Policy (Maine)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Maine Rivers Policy accompanies the Maine Waterway Development and Conservation Act and provides additional protection for some river and stream segments, which are designated as outstanding...

139

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 12, 2011 January 12, 2011 The carbon steel doors come together to form an upside-down L-shape. The 102-ton door was set on top of the 85-ton door that was installed at the end of December. Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Sets Massive Protective Shield door in Pretreatment Facility Richland, Wash. -- Earlier this week, an enormous protective shield door was set in the Pretreatment Facility at the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant, also known as the "Vit Plant." The 102-ton door was lowered through the roof and placed on top of an adjoining 85-ton door that was installed at the end of December. January 10, 2011 CX-007074: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Vancouver CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 01/10/2011 Location(s): Vancouver, Washington

140

Dissolved and particulate aluminum in the Columbia River and coastal waters of Oregon and Washington: behavior in near-field and far-field plumes  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Dissolved and particulate aluminum in the Columbia River and coastal waters of Oregon) and particulate (leachable and total) aluminum was examined in the Columbia River and estuary, in near Influence on Shelf Ecosystems (RISE) cruise of May/June 2006. Dissolved and particulate aluminum (Al

Hickey, Barbara

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Environmental Health and Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Environmental Health and Safety Design Guide Fire Protection Systems SCOPE. BACKGROUND The University is largely self-insured and believes fire protection significantly reduces its risk protection in many occupancies but fire protection is not required in Group B occupancy buildings. Class B

Wilcock, William

142

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 13, 2012 July 13, 2012 First of Hanford's Highly Radioactive Sludge Moved Away from River RICHLAND, Wash. - Workers have started moving highly radioactive material, called sludge, awayfrom the Columbia River, marking a significant milestone in the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s cleanup of the Hanford Site in Washington State. July 9, 2012 EA-1912: Draft Environmental Assessment Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project Benton County, WA July 3, 2012 EIS-0312: Record of Decision (2012) Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision: Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Kalispel Tribe July 3, 2012 DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash. RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional

143

Review of the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Firre Protection System Design  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

the the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Fire Protection System Design January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Review of the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Fire Protection System Design Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1

144

Review of the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Firre Protection System Design  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Fire Protection System Design January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Review of the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Fire Protection System Design Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1

145

Federal Government Congressional Budget Office, Budget Analysis Division Washington, DC  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Washington, DC Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Government Congressional Budget Office, Budget Analysis Division Washington, DC Department Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation & Air Quality Ann Arbor, MI Federal Drug

Shyy, Wei

146

Microsoft Word - Grays River Chum Supplementation Program.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

KEC-4 KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum J. Baugher Project Manager - KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Gray's River Chum Supplementation Program Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2008-710-00 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.20 Small-scale activities undertaken to protect, restore, or improve fish and wildlife habitat, fish passage facilities (such as fish ladders or minor diversion channels), or fisheries. Location: Grays River, Pacific County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Description of the Proposed Action: Chum salmon in the Grays River have been identified as a primary population targeted to improve to a level that contributes to recovery of the species (LCFRB

147

Pre-and post-Missoula flood geomorphology of the Pre-Holocene ancestral Columbia River Valley in the Portland forearc basin, Oregon and Washington, USA  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Geomorphic landscape development in the pre-Holocene ancestral Columbia River Valley (15km width) in the Portland forearc basin (~50km length) is established from depositional sequences, which pre-date and post-date the glacial Lake Missoula floods. The sequences are observed from selected borehole logs (150 in number) and intact terrace soil profiles (56 in number) in backhoe trenches. Four sequences are widespread, including (1) a vertically aggraded Pleistocene alluvial plain, (2) a steep sided valley that is incised (125150m) into the Pleistocene gravel plain, (3) Missoula flood terraces (1913ka) abandoned on the sides of the ancestral valley, and (4) Holocene flooding surfaces (118ka) buried at 7030m depth in the axial Columbia River Valley. Weathering rims and cementation are used for relative dating of incised Pleistocene gravel units. Soil development on the abandoned Missoula flood terraces is directly related to terrace deposit lithology, including thin Bw horizons in gravel, irregular podzols in sand, and multiple Bw horizons in thicker loess-capping layers. Radiocarbon dating of sand and mud alluvium in the submerged axial valley ties Holocene flooding surfaces to a local sea level curve and establishes Holocene sedimentation rates of 1.5cmyear?1 during 119ka and 0.3cmyear?1 during 90ka. The sequences of Pleistocene gravel aggradation, river valley incision, cataclysmic Missoula flooding, and Holocene submergence yield complex geomorphic landscapes in the ancestral lower Columbia River Valley.

Curt D. Peterson; Rick Minor; Gary L. Peterson; Edward B. Gates

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need to Operate Mirant's  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need to Operate Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need to Operate Mirant's Potomac River Generation Station to Support Local Area Reliability (Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2005) Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need to Operate Mirant's Potomac River Generation Station to Support Local Area Reliability (Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2005) Pursuant to Docket No. EO-05-01: Oak Ridge National Laboratory provided an analysis of the Mirant Potomac River Generation Station in 2005 and discussed the reliability requirements of the local area and the potential impacts on reliability of changing operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in this paper. Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need to Operate Mirant's Potomac River Generation Station to Support Local Area Reliability.pdf

149

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Management Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew April 14, 2010 Providence RI Washington Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 3 Presentation Overview * EO 13514 - Strategic Sustainability Plans * DOE's approach * EISA section 432 update * Outreach Opportunities - Federal Energy Management Awards - Energy Empowers Campaign - GovEnergy Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 4 EO13514 Sustainability Plans Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 5 EO 13514 Goals In addition to GHG goals, the EO requires agencies to meet sustainability targets, including: * 30% reduction in vehicle fleet petroleum use by 2020; * 26% reduction in potable, industrial, landscaping, and agricultural water consumption by 2020;

150

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew October 20, 2010 Rapid City, SD Washington Update 2 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview * FEMP Updates * GHG Guidance Update * EISA Section 432 Update * Mark Your Calendar 3 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov * Richard Kidd is leaving FEMP - Will become Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Energy and Sustainability - Skye Schell will assume the role of interim Program Manager * Jesse Feinberg (Energetics) departed over the summer to attend grad school Columbia * Sarah Mabbitt (smabbitt@energetics.com)

151

Washington, DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of. Energy of. Energy Washington, DC' 26585 , The Honorable Gene Eriquez .~ City Hall I55 Deer Hill Avenue + Danbury/Connecticut 06180 .. -r. - Dear Mayor Eriquez: Secretary of Energy Hazel O!Leary has .announced a knew approach -to openness in. the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications with the public. In support of th,is initiative, we are,pleased to forward the enclosed information, related to the former Sperry Products,'.Inc. site in your jurisdiction ,that performed,work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. Th,is informatipn is provided,for your information, use, and retenti~oh. DOE's Formeily Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for. identification of sites used by'DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and,

152

Department Washington,  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington, of Energy DC 20545 Mr. Roy J. Villella, Jr. Assistant Secretary Diebold, Incorporated 818 Mulberry Road, S.E. F. 0. Box 8230 Canton, Ohio 44711-8230 Dear Mr..Villella: Enclosed is your copy of the signed consent form for the survey of those portions of the Diebold property used by the former owner, Herring Hall and Marvin Safe Company, to machine uranium rod for the Manhattan Engineer District. I have directed our contractor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to coordinate the specific time and details for the visit and survey. Mr. Woodrow Cottrell, ORNL, or his representative, will be contacting you in this regard. If you have any questions regarding the survey, please call me at (301) 353-5439. Sincerely, Andrew Wallo III, Designation

153

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Management Program Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update Dr. Timothy Unruh October 25-26, 2011 Philadelphia, PA 2 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview  Federal Government Goals and Status  FEMP Update  UESC Program Overview and Goals  Mark Your Calendar: Spring 2012 FUPWG 3 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov FEMP's Mission FEMP provides the services, tools, and expertise to Federal agencies to help them achieve their legislated and executive ordered energy, greenhouse gas, and water goals. This is delivered through project financing services, technical assistance, and communications and training. 4 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov

154

Asotin Creek Model Watershed Plan: Asotin County, Washington, 1995.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Northwest Power Planning Council completed its ``Strategy for Salmon'' in 1992. This is a plan, composed of four specific elements,designed to double the present production of 2.5 million salmon in the Columbia River watershed. These elements have been called the ``four H's'': (1) improve harvest management; (2) improve hatcheries and their production practices; (3) improve survival at hydroelectric dams; and (4) improve and protect fish habitat. The Asotin Creek Model Watershed Plan is the first to be developed in Washington State which is specifically concerned with habitat protection and restoration for salmon and trout. The plan is consistent with the habitat element of the ``Strategy for Salmon''. Asotin Creek is similar in many ways to other salmon-bearing streams in the Snake River system. Its watershed has been significantly impacted by human activities and catastrophic natural events, such as floods and droughts. It supports only remnant salmon and trout populations compared to earlier years. It will require protection and restoration of its fish habitat and riparian corridor in order to increase its salmonid productivity.

Browne, Dave

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design, May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR SRS-2013-5-07 HIAR SRS-2013-5-07 Site: Savannah River Site Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Savannah River Site (SRS) Waste Solidification Building (WSB) Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design Dates of Activity : 05/07/2013 - 05/09/2013 Report Preparer: Joseph Lenahan Activity Description/Purpose: 1. Review the corrective actions being implemented by the construction contractor to address Findings 1-4, 6, and 9 from a construction quality review performed by the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) (Reference 1). 2. Meet with the SRS WSB project staff and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) engineers to discuss the

156

Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design, May 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR SRS-2013-5-07 HIAR SRS-2013-5-07 Site: Savannah River Site Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Savannah River Site (SRS) Waste Solidification Building (WSB) Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design Dates of Activity : 05/07/2013 - 05/09/2013 Report Preparer: Joseph Lenahan Activity Description/Purpose: 1. Review the corrective actions being implemented by the construction contractor to address Findings 1-4, 6, and 9 from a construction quality review performed by the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) (Reference 1). 2. Meet with the SRS WSB project staff and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) engineers to discuss the

157

EM Sites Honored for Bird Protection Practices  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

WASHINGTON, D.C. A federal council recently recognized two EM sites for efforts to protect migratory birds.

158

Bacterial Source Tracking to Support the Development and Implementation of Watershed Protection Plans for the Lampasas and Leon Rivers: Lampasas River Watershed Final Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

..................................................................................................... 14 Laboratory Procedures ........................................................................................ 14 Results ................................................................................................................. 15 Known... forming units (CFU) per 100 mL .................................................................................... 15 Table 6 Known source fecal samples collected in the Lampasas River Watershed . 17 Table 7 City, volume, and discharge location...

Gregory, L.; Casarez, E.; Truesdale, J.; Di Giovanni, G.; Owen, T; Wolfe, J.

2013-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

159

Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) Hanford Tank Waste Treatment Alternatives March 2000  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently planning to retrieve, pretreat, immobilize and safely dispose of 53 million gallons of highly radioactive waste currently stored in underground tanks at Hanford Site. The DOE plan is a two-phased approach to privatizing the processing of hazardous and radioactive waste. Phase 1 is a proof-of-concept/commercial demonstration-scale effort whose objectives are to: demonstrate, the technical and business viability of using privatized facilities to treat Hanford tank waste; define and maintain required levels of radiological, nuclear, process and occupational safety; maintain environmental protection and compliance; and substantially reduce life-cycle costs and time required to treat Hanford tank waste. The Phase 1 effort consists of Part A and Part B. On September 25, 1996 (Reference 1), DOE signed a contract with BNFL, Inc. (BNFL) to commence with Phase 1, Part A. In August 1998, BNFL was authorized to proceed with Phase I, Part 6-1, a 24-month design phase that will-provide sufficient engineering and financial maturity to establish fixed-unit prices and financing terms for tank waste processing services in privately-owned and -operated facilities. By August 2000, DOE will decide whether to authorize BNFL to proceed with construction and operation of the proposed processing facilities, or pursue a different path. To support of the decision, DOE is evaluating alternatives to potentially enhance the BNFL tank waste processing contract, as well as, developing an alternate path forward should DOE decide to not continue the BNFL contract. The decision on whether to continue with the current privatization strategy (BNFL contract) or to pursue an alternate can not be made until the evaluation process leading up to the decision on whether to authorize BNFL to proceed with construction and operation (known as the Part 8-2 decision) is completed. The evaluation process includes reviewing and evaluating the information BNFL is scheduled to submit in April 2000, and negotiating the best mutually acceptable contract terms. The alternatives studies completed to-date are summarized in Reference 2.

WODRICH, D.D.

2000-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

160

Lower Columbia River Terminal Fisheries Research Project : Final Environmental Assessment.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This notice announces BPA`S`s decision to fund the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and the Clatsop Economic Development Committee for the Lower Columbia River Terminal Fisheries Research Project (Project). The Project will continue the testing of various species/stocks, rearing regimes, and harvest options for terminal fisheries, as a means to increase lower river sport and commercial harvest of hatchery fish, while providing both greater protection of weaker wild stocks and increasing the return of upriver salmon runs to potential Zone 6 Treaty fisheries. The Project involves relocating hatchery smolts to new, additional pen locations in three bays/sloughs in the lower Columbia River along both the Oregon and Washington sides. The sites are Blind Slough and Tongue Point in Clatsop County, Oregon, and Grays Bay/Deep River, Wahkiakum County, Washington. The smolts will be acclimated for various lengths of time in the net pens and released from these sites. The Project will expand upon an existing terminal fisheries project in Youngs Bay, Oregon. The Project may be expanded to other sites in the future, depending on the results of this initial expansion. BPA`S has determined the project is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required, and BPA`S is issuing this FONSI.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

declaration and management of Potential Inadequacies in the Safety Basis (PISA's); c) Upgrading of the 242-A Evaporator DSA to comply with DOE-STD-3009 CN3 d) Unreviewed Safety...

162

,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050WA3","N3010WA3","N3020WA3","N3035WA3","N3045WA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Washington (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Washington...

163

Washington's power supply collapse  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... ON 25 July 1983 the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) defaulted on 2,250 million of municipal revenue bonds. This, ... has been polemical and accusatory in nature, blaming the Washington State Supreme Court, the Bonneville ...

Roger H. Bezdek

1985-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

164

Department of Energy Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Violations Department of Energy Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Violations September 1, 2011 - 4:07pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy has issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Washington Group International, Inc. (WGI) for a September 2010 incident that violated the Department's radiation protection and nuclear safety regulations, and has proposed a $412,500 civil penalty. The violations are associated with a radiological contamination incident that occurred on September 29, 2010, during open air demolition of Building H2 at the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) nuclear facilities

165

Department of Energy Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Violations Department of Energy Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Violations September 1, 2011 - 4:07pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy has issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Washington Group International, Inc. (WGI) for a September 2010 incident that violated the Department's radiation protection and nuclear safety regulations, and has proposed a $412,500 civil penalty. The violations are associated with a radiological contamination incident that occurred on September 29, 2010, during open air demolition of Building H2 at the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) nuclear facilities

166

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 21, 2012 May 21, 2012 CX-008716: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Tacoma Power Chehalis- Covington 230-Kilovolt (kV) Line/Convert Microwave Signals From Analog To Digital CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration May 18, 2012 CX-009096: Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Customs and Border Protection Non-Intrusive Inspection Tests CX(s) Applied: B3.10, B3.11 Date: 05/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Pacific Northwest Site Office May 17, 2012 CX-008717: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation of Wood Poles on Centralia B Street No. 1 for Proposed Centralia City Light May Street Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/17/2012

167

Award Fee Determination Scorecard Contractor: Washington River...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Tank (DST) System Excellent SEA 2: Performance of Tank Farms Project Operations - Conduct of Operations Very Good SEA 3: Cost Performance Very Good SEA 4: Quality Assurance...

168

Bacterial Source Tracking to Support the Development and Implementation of Watershed Protection Plans for the Lampasas and Leon Rivers: Lampasas River Watershed Final Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Watershed MGD Million Gallons per Day n Number of Samples (or E. coli isolates) NA-MUG Nutrient Agar with 4-methylumbelliferyl- ?-D-glucuronide (MUG) mTEC Membrane Thermotolerant E. coli OSSF Onsite Sewage Facility QAPP Quality Assurance... Protection Agency (EPA) method 1603 modified mTEC (USEPA 2006), and 5) collecting at least 50 known source fecal samples for the isolation of E. coli and augmentation of the Texas E. coli BST Library. Building on previous work conducted in the LRW (TSSWCB...

Gregory, L.; Casarez, E.; Truesdale, J.; Di Giovanni, G.; Owen, T.; Wolfe, J.

2013-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

169

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 9, 1995 November 9, 1995 EA-1123: Final Environmental Assessment Transfer of Normal and Low-Enriched Uranium Billets to the United Kingdom, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0212: Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0173: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Puget Power Northwest Washington Transmission Project October 1, 1995 EIS-0245: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Finding of No Significant Impact Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Final Environmental Assessment Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington

170

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 25, 1994 February 25, 1994 EA-0915: Final Environmental Assessment Waste Tank Safety Program Hanford Site, Richland, Washington January 1, 1994 EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tenaska Washington II Generation Project, Washington September 16, 1993 EIS-0119: Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington December 1, 1992 EIS-0119: Final Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1, 1992 EA-0429: Final Environmental Assessment Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 10, 1992 EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact Tank 241-c-103 Organic Vapor and Liquid Characterization and Supporting

171

EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), 6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration to fund the portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to wildlife habitat mitigation projects to be undertaken in a cooperative effort with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Finding of No Significant Impact Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic) July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Final Environmental Assessment Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic)

172

Fish and river pollution (J. R. Erichsen Jones)  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Fish and River. Pollution. Butterworth. Inc., Washington,. D.C. viii + 203 p. $9.75. Fish und River Pollution by J. R. Erichsen Jones fills the long-felt need for a...

1999-12-28T23:59:59.000Z

173

Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State November 8, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis EERE SunShot...

174

2015 Washington Auto Show  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz attended the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, DC on January 22, 2015. He delivered brief remarks on the Energy Department's role in electric and fuel cell vehicle technology, announced more than $55 million in funding opportunities to support fuel-efficient vehicle technologies and visited several of the exhibits featuring recent additions to the vehicles market.

175

2015 Washington Auto Show  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz attended the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, DC on January 22, 2015. He delivered brief remarks on the Energy Department's role in electric and fuel cell vehicle technology, and visited several of the exhibits featuring recent additions to the vehicles market.

176

The Nation's Rivers  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...soil erosion and the need for soil conserva-tion were first clearly...residuals accumu-lated in soils, vegetation, and other organisms...from the Potomac River near Washing-ton, D.C., and doubtless...Ruhe and R. B. Daniels, J. Soil Water Conserv. 20, 52 (1965...

M. Gordon Wolman

1971-11-26T23:59:59.000Z

177

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 15, 2010 March 15, 2010 CX-001180: Categorical Exclusion Determination Monroe-Custer Number 1 and 2 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line Structure 16/2 Access Road Improvement and Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 12, 2010 CX-006365: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Spokane CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Spokane, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-006364: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Pasco CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Pasco, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-001182: Categorical Exclusion Determination

178

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26, 2010 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 23, 2010 EIS-0119: Amended Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Fiber Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/21/2010 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington

179

EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington 4: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts from DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to assist with funding the construction, operation, and maintenance of modifications to the Klickitat Hatchery and the Yakama Nation's Hatchery Complex Program that intend to aid populations of anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams. The proposed action could include support for modifications to the existing hatchery, a new hatchery/acclimation facility in Wahkiacus, Washington, and an acclimation facility at McCreedy Creek in Yakima County, Washington. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time.

180

EIS-0419: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, Washington |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

19: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, 19: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, Washington EIS-0419: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to allow the electrical interconnection of Whistling Ridge Energy, LLC's proposed 75-megawatt (MW) wind project in Skamania County, Washington, to the Federal Columbia River Transmission System. DOE's Bonneville Power Administration will act as the federal lead agency under NEPA and the Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council will act as the state lead agency under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download August 23, 2011 EIS-0419: Final Environmental Impact Statement

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Westinghouse Savannah River Company: Report from the DOE Voluntary Protection Program onsite reviews, February 24--March 7, 1997, and June 15--19, 1998  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program (DOE-VPP) Initial and Update Review Teams` findings from the onsite evaluations of the Westinghouse Savannah River Site (SRS), conducted February 24--March 7, 1997, and June 15-19, 1998. The site was evaluated against the program requirements contained in US Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program, Part 1: Program Elements to determine its success in implementing the five tenets of DOE-VPP. The Initial Review Team concluded that WSRC met or surpassed all DOE-VPP requirements, with the exception of 12 minor findings and 5 recommendations. WSRC was asked to resolve the findings within 90 days. During a follow-up visit in January 1996, representatives of the Team verified that all 90-day actions were completed. The Update Team detected though that the program did not demonstrate thorough and meaningful employee involvement. The ability to attain and sustain VPP-level performance on employee involvement is a significant challenge. Large companies with multiple layers of management and geographically disperse personnel have particular difficulty.

NONE

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 17, 2009 July 17, 2009 EIS-0424: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Klickitat Hatchery Program, Klickitat and Yakima Counties, WA July 1, 2009 EA-1660: Final Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington April 21, 2009 EIS-0419: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Whistling Ridge Energy Project in Skamania County, Washington. March 12, 2009 State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire Letter from Washington Governor Gregoire providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so that Recovery Act funds can be made available. These assurances are required by Section 410 of the American Recovery and

183

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 23, 2010 November 23, 2010 CX-004464: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Area Radio Communications Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/01/2010 Location(s): Franklin County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2010 CX-004524: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington State University Building Upgrades and Resource Conservation Manager CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 19, 2010 CX-004525: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Services Corps CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Kitsap County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

184

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 8, 2000 March 8, 2000 EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington September 15, 1999 EIS-0310: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Accomplishing Expanded Civilian Nuclear Energy Research and Development and Isotope Production Missions in the United States, Including the Role of the Fast Flux Test Facility September 1, 1999 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 16, 1999 EIS-0169-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site

185

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21, 2011 21, 2011 CX-007750: Categorical Exclusion Determination Highlands Trail in the Longview-Cowlitz Number 1 Transmission Line Right-of-Way CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration December 16, 2011 Cows like these in Skagit County, Washington, supply the biodigester developed by Kevin Maas of Farm Power up to 70,000 gallons of manure per day. The newest Farm Power facility in Washington generates enough electricity to power 500 homes. Photo courtesy of sea_turtle. Farming Out Heat and Electricity through Biopower The newest biodigester at the Farm Power facility in Washington generates electricity from biogas created from bacteria's anaerobic digestion of cow

186

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and...

187

EIS-0425: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0425: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington EIS-0425: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington EIS-0425: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to fund the construction, operation, and maintenance of a coho salmon restoration program sponsored by the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation to help mitigate impacts to fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams on the Columbia River. The Proposed Action would involve building a new, small, in-basin adult holding/spawning, incubation and rearing facility on the Wenatchee River at one of two potential sites; and constructing and improving several sites in both the Wenatchee and Methow river basins in north central Washington State.

188

EIS-0425: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington 25: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington EIS-0425: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to fund the construction, operation, and maintenance of a coho salmon restoration program sponsored by the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation to help mitigate impacts to fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams on the Columbia River. The Proposed Action would involve building a new, small, in-basin adult holding/spawning, incubation and rearing facility on the Wenatchee River at one of two potential sites; and constructing and improving several sites in both the Wenatchee and Methow river basins in north central Washington State.

189

Energy Matters in Washington State  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energy Matters in Washington State Energy Matters in Washington State www.energy.wsu.edu/library/ November 2009 #12;905 Plum Street SE, Building 3 P.O. Box 43169 Olympia, Washington 98504-3169 Energy University Extension Energy Program. 905 Plum Street SE, Building 3, P.O. Box 43169, Olympia, Washington

Collins, Gary S.

190

Savannah River Site - Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Reports Reports Savannah River Site Review Reports 2013 Independent Oversight Review of the Savannah River Field Office Tritium Facilities Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation, November 2013 Independent Oversight Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development, August 2013 Independent Oversight Review of the Employee Concerns Program at the Savannah River Operations Office, July 2013 Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Salt Waste Processing Facility Project, January 2013 Review of the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Fire Protection System Design, January 2013 Activity Reports 2013 Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design, May 2013

191

Nez Perce use of the Southeast Washington Sub-basin Draft Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

River Salmon Recovery Board and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. The work group has pursuant to Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Public Law 102-575. Introduction #12-Umatilla National Forest, the Asotin County Conservation District, the Washington Department of Ecology, the Snake

192

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- June 4, 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Potential Violations of the Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Rules at the Savannah River Site

193

Feasibility Study of Economics and Performance of Solar Photovoltaics at the Snohomish County Cathcart Landfill Site in Snohomish County, Washington. A Study Prepared in Partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America's Land Initiative: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in accordance with the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, selected the Snohomish County Cathcart Landfill Site in Snohomish County, Washington, for a feasibility study of renewable energy production. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) provided technical assistance for this project. The purpose of this report is to assess the site for a photovoltaic (PV) system installation and estimate the cost, performance, and site impacts of different PV options. In addition, the report recommends financing options that could assist in the implementation of a PV system at the site.

Olis, D.; Salasovich, J.; Mosey, G.; Healey, V.

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

One Earth Future Foundation and George Washington University's Institute for Corporate Responsibility invite you a panel discussion on business and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). This event will bring  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

One Earth Future Foundation and George Washington University's Institute for Corporate associate at One Earth Future Foundation · Jonas Claes, program officer, US Institute of Peace · Raymond Earth Future Foundation by phone, 303.533.1707 or by email, rspivak@oneearthfuture.org. Best regards

Vertes, Akos

195

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

15, 2010 15, 2010 CX-001639: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transportation Demand Management on 164th S/128th SW/20th SE CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 15, 2010 CX-001821: Categorical Exclusion Determination SGL Automotive Carbon Limited Liability Company (LLC) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Moses Lake, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 31, 2010 CX-001386: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dragoon Creek Access to Bonneville Power Administration's Bell-Boundary #3 Transmission Line to Replace Existing Bridge CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B1.3 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Spokane County, Washington

196

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25, 2010 25, 2010 CX-003611: Categorical Exclusion Determination Schultz - Raver Number 3 and 4 500-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Lines Spacer Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination

197

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 9, 2010 September 9, 2010 CX-003832: Categorical Exclusion Determination Issaquah Highlands Zero Energy Affordable Housing CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1, B6.3 Date: 09/09/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 8, 2010 CX-003908: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fiscal Year 2010 Columbia Basin Fish Accords with Colville Confederated Tribes CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 8, 2010 CX-003789: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grandview-Red Mountain Number 1 Proposed Transmission Line Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington

198

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 15, 2011 February 15, 2011 CX-005262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Woodland and 148th Clearwire Wireless Communication Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 02/15/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration February 11, 2011 CX-005224: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/11/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 10, 2011 CX-005218: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/10/2011 Location(s): Renton, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

199

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 16, 2009 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Kittitas Valley Wind Project September 15, 2009 EIS-0312: Record of Decision Washington-Action Agency Estuary Habitat Memorandum of Agreement

200

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 3, 2010 May 3, 2010 CX-002190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation Energy Efficiency Retrofits of Tribal Center CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Nisqually Reservation, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy May 3, 2010 CX-002438: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rocky Reach-Maple Valley Number-1 Transmission Line Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 30, 2010 CX-002137: Categorical Exclusion Determination Farm Power Lynden CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/30/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 13, 2010 October 13, 2010 CX-004253: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northwest Natural Devine Road Land Use Review Request CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 13, 2010 CX-004252: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Two Broken Transformers Near the Roza Dam Adult Trap Facility CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460) October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement (Appendices) Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460), Washington Comments and responses to DEIS-0456: Cushman Hydroelectric Project.

202

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2011 22, 2011 CX-006583: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along Portions of the Grand Coulee-Chief Joseph #1 and #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 22, 2011 CX-006580: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along the Grand Coulee-Okanogan #2 115-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 18, 2011 EA-1728: Draft Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 15, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site,

203

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 17, 2010 December 17, 2010 CX-004835: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electric Vehicle Charging Stations City of Mill Creek CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/17/2010 Location(s): Mill Creek, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 16, 2010 CX-004691: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Kirkland, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 16, 2010 CX-004836: Categorical Exclusion Determination Marine and Hydrokinetic Technology Readiness Advancement Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Lynnwood, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

204

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010 CX-003023: Categorical Exclusion Determination Output Power Purchase Agreement with Northwest Energy Supply Cooperative - Barr-Tech, LLC Resource CX(s) Applied: B4.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Fishtrap, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2010 CX-002874: Categorical Exclusion Determination Game Farm Park Energy Efficient Replacement Lighting Project CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 30, 2010 CX-002873: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green House Gas Inventory CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 24, 2010 CX-002876: Categorical Exclusion Determination

205

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

206

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 19,2010 August 19,2010 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Neil Brosee President Washington Closure Hanford, LLC 2620 Fermi Avenue Richland, Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the employee fall that occurred at the Hanford High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) on July 1, 2009. The worker sustained serious injury to his back and broke bones in both legs. Based on an evaluation of the evidence in this matter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program, by Washington Closure Hanford, LLC (WCH) occurred. Accordingly, DOE is issuing the enclosed Preliminary Notice of

207

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 27, 1998 August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 13, 1998 EIS-0229: Notice of Availability of the Amended Record of Decision Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials August 1, 1998 EIS-0245-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1998 EIS-0189: Supplement Analysis Tank Waste Remediation System July 28, 1997 EA-1203: Final Environmental Assessment Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site,

208

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2010 September 30, 2010 CX-004092: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004074: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cascade Community Wind Mid Scale Wind Turbines CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 29, 2010 CX-004145: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Low Energy Enzyme Catalyzed Solvent for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/29/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington

209

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 7, 2011 October 7, 2011 CX-006814: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia Rural Electric Association (Columbia REA) Dayton Substation Tap Line Project CX(s) Applied: B4.12 Date: 10/07/2011 Location(s): Dayton, Columbia County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 28, 2011 CX-006957: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - Seattle Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Sandia Site Office September 26, 2011 EIS-0421: Record of Decision Big Eddy-Knight Transmission Project Wasco County, Oregon and Klickitat County, Washington September 26, 2011 CX-006843: Categorical Exclusion Determination ER52 Fire Station Warning Signals

210

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13, 2010 13, 2010 CX-003035: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B4.4, B5.1 Date: 07/13/2010 Location(s): Fox Island, Washington Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 12, 2010 CX-003628: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kittitas County Conservation Easement Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003447: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bridge and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003240: Categorical Exclusion Determination

211

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 26, 2011 July 26, 2011 Hanford Reaches Recovery Act Goal for Waste Cleanup Ahead of Schedule - Workers Shipped 1,800 Cubic Meters for Treatment and Disposal RICHLAND, Wash. - Today, the Department of Energy Hanford Site announced it reached a cleanup goal more than two months ahead of schedule at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. July 25, 2011 CX-006290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cardwell-Cowlitz 2011 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/25/2011 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2011 CX-006304: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell #3/Grand Coulee-Westside #1 Insulator Replacement and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/21/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington

212

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 18, 2009 November 18, 2009 CX-000195: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington County Pierce CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/18/2009 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 12, 2009 CX-000376: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boise White Paper Mill Carbon Capture and Sequestration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 11/12/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 4, 2009 Hydropower Upgrades to Yield Added Generation at Average Costs Less Than 4 cents per kWh - Without New Dams $30.6 million Recovery Act investment by the Department of Energy highlights the additional potential of hydro power November 2, 2009

213

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-002030: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Array and Charging Stations - Administration Building/Cathcart CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-002029: Categorical Exclusion Determination Engine Generator for Enumclaw Dairy Manure Digester CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-001830: Categorical Exclusion Determination YWCA Family Village at Issaquah CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King county, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

214

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 10, 2003 March 10, 2003 EIS-0330: Record of Decision Wallula-McNary Transmission Line Project and Wallula Power Project March 7, 2003 EA-1454: Finding of No Significant Impact Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and 100-N Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington March 6, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-128: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EA-1454: Final Environmental Assessment Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and

215

Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project Black-Cell and Hard-to-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

216

Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project Black-Cell and Hard-to-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2

217

Fire Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1066-2012 December 2012 _______________ Supersedes DOE-STD-1066-99 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION U.S. Department of Energy AREA FIRP Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web page at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1066-2012 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD) supersedes DOE-STD-1066-99 1 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. The following fire protection standard is canceled with the issuance of this Standard and appropriate technical content was incorporated into this Standard:  DOE-STD-1088-95, Fire Protection for Relocatable Structures

218

Washington.indd  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington Washington www.effi cientwindows.org March 2013 1. Meet the Energy Code and Look for the ENERGY STAR ® Windows must comply with your local energy code. Windows that are ENERGY STAR qualifi ed typically meet or exceed energy code requirements. To verify if specific window energy properties comply with the local code requirements, go to Step 2. 2. Look for Effi cient Properties on the NFRC Label The National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) label is needed for verifi cation of energy code compliance (www.nfrc. org). The NFRC label displays whole- window energy properties and appears on all fenestration products which are part of the ENERGY STAR program.

219

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Environmental for the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1 . 0 Summary . . 2.0 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . 3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Proposed Action 3.2 Onsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Offsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . 3.4 No Action Alternative ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Atmospheric Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Terrestrial Impacts . 5.1.3 Impacts on CERCLA Remedial Actions . 5.1.4 Construction Accidents .

220

Energy Incentive Programs, Washington | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Washington Energy Incentive Programs, Washington Updated January 2013 Washington utilities budgeted over 180 million in 2011 to promote increased energy efficiency in the state,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Washington/Incentives | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington/Incentives Washington/Incentives < Washington Jump to: navigation, search Contents 1 Financial Incentive Programs for Washington 2 Rules, Regulations and Policies for Washington Download All Financial Incentives and Policies for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 184) Financial Incentive Programs for Washington Download Financial Incentives for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 163) Incentive Incentive Type Active Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Lighting Energy Efficiency Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Energy Efficiency Incentives Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Food Equipment Rebates (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No

222

Washington: Washington's Clean Energy Resources and Economy (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document highlights the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's investments and impacts in the state of Washington.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

Oversight Reports - Hanford | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 6, 2011 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - October 2011 Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection...

224

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility- April 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Quality and Fire Protection Systems

225

Washington County Comprehensive plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Overview of Washington County's Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Steep Slopes 82 Inventory & Assessment - Karst 83 Natural Resources Recommendations What Are the Key Findings from the Research? 13 Land Use 13 Economic Development 13 Housing 13 Natural

226

Wood River Levee Reconstruction, Madison County, IL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Wood River Levee Reconstruction, Madison County, IL 25 October 2006 Abstract: The recommended plan provides for flood damage reduction and restores the original degree of protection of the Wood River Levee-federal sponsor is the Wood River Drainage and Levee District. The Wood River Levee System was authorized

US Army Corps of Engineers

227

Baseline Hydrologic Studies in the Lower Elwha River Prior to  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

After the removal of two large, longstanding dams on the Elwha River, Washington, the additional loadChapter 4 4 Chapter Baseline Hydrologic Studies in the Lower Elwha River Prior to Dam Removal characteristics of the river and estuary before dam removal, several hydrologic data sets were collected

228

Youghiogheny Wild and Scenic River (Maryland)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Portions of the Youghiogheny River are protected under the Scenic and Wild Rivers Act, and development on or near these areas is restricted. COMAR section 08.15.02 addresses permitted uses and...

229

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28, 2011 28, 2011 EIS-0423: Final Environmental Impact Statement Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 28, 2011 CX-005134: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Yakama Nation for the Purchase of Three Parcels of Property Along Reecer Creek CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 01/28/2011 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 28, 2011 EIS-0423: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Long -Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 21, 2011 CX-005130: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ringold Substation Structure Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 01/21/2011 Location(s): Basin City, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

230

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 26, 1997 February 26, 1997 EIS-0189: Record of Decision Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, WA December 1, 1996 EA-1111: Final Environmental Assessment K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 21, 1996 EA-1177: Final Environmental Assessment Salvage/Demolition of 200 West Area, 200 East Area, and 300 Area Steam Plants August 1, 1996 EIS-0189: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1996 EIS-0244: Final Environmental Impact Statement Plutonium Finishing Plant Stabilization April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement Disposal of Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser, Ohio Class, Los Angeles and Class Naval Reactor Plants April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement

231

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 15, 2011 April 15, 2011 CX-005676: Categorical Exclusion Determination Murray-Custer #1 Transmission Line Wood Pole Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/15/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 13, 2011 Algae samples back at the NREL lab, ready to be analyzed and run through the Fluorescent-Activated Cell Sorter, or FACS, which separates the cells. | Credit: NREL Staff Photographer Dennis Schroeder. Study: Algae Could Replace 17% of U.S. Oil Imports A new study from Pacific Northwest National Lab concludes that 17% of U.S. oil imports for transportation could be replaced by domestically-produced algae biofuels. April 12, 2011 Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings King County uses $6.1 million to make investments that dramatically reduce

232

Washington. DC,20585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington. DC,20585 Washington. DC,20585 MAY' i 1995 .- The Honorable Freeman R. Bosley, Jr. ' r City Hall 1200 Narket Street St. Louis, Missouri 63103 Dear Mayor Bosley: ,'~ ,. : !' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary'has announced a new approach to'openness'in " the Department of,Energy"(DOE) and its communications with the pu~blic. In 'support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the enclosed information rel,ated to the former Petrolite Corp. site in your jurisdiction that,performed, work for DDE or,i.ts predecessor agencies. your information, use, and retention. This information is provided for DDE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identification of sites used by DDE's predecessor agencies, determining their

233

I ' Washington, DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

' Washington, DC' ' Washington, DC' 20585 The.Honorable Don Trotter, 102' Public Square Clarksville, Tennessee '37040 '_ _' ' Dear Mayor Trotter: '. Secretary of Energy Hazel .O'Leary has announced a new the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward related to the Clarksville Foundry.& Machine Co. site approach to openness in with the publ,ic'. In " the~enclosed~information in your'jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its predecessor'agencies. This information. is provided, for.your information, use, and retention. remedial action conservative' set of technical investigations to assure environment. If'you have any questions, please feel free~to call DrI W. Alexander Uilliams 301-427-1719 of my staff.

234

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24, 2011 24, 2011 Chemical engineer Alan Zacher 10 Questions for a Chemical Engineer: Alan Zacher Chemical engineer Alan Zacher took some time to share advice for students interested in science and engineering and give us the download on his work developing propylene glycol from renewable sources. March 24, 2011 CX-005523: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Bellevue CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/24/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 22, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Determination Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, WA March 22, 2011 EIS-0422: Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Central Ferry to Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project

235

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2011 9, 2011 Department of Energy Announces $39 Million to Strengthen University-Led Nuclear Energy Research and Development 51 Projects Aim to Cut Carbon Pollution, Create Clean Energy Jobs and Strengthen America's Nuclear Energy Industry August 9, 2011 CX-006474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Biodiesel Crusher and Dryer Facility Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/09/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 8, 2011 CX-006463: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/08/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 8, 2011

236

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000346: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2009 CX-000457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Focused Site Characterization for Carbon Dioxide Storage Along a Mount Simon Sandstone Fairway in the Michigan Basin CX(s) Applied: A1, A9

237

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 EIS-0333: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration, Benton County, Washington March 1, 2002 EA-1405: Final Environmental Assessment Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 27, 2002 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Mint Farm Generation Project February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-46: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-45: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 15, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-42: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 1, 2002 EIS-0332: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

238

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 16, 2005 March 16, 2005 EIS-0312-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan December 23, 2004 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Hopkins Ridge Wind Interconnection Project September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project, Water Flow Restoration and Streambed Rehabilitation, Providing Passage for Summer Steelhead and Spring Chinook, Funding, Okanogan County, Washington September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project, Whatcom County, Washington

239

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11, 2011 11, 2011 EIS-0422: Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration's Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project March 11, 2011 CX-005421: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohop Underbuild Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6, B4.12 Date: 03/11/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 7, 2011 CX-005417: Categorical Exclusion Determination Beaver Creek Property CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 03/07/2011 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 4, 2011 Latest 200 Area Demolition Offers Snapshot of Hanford Cleanup Progress: Recovery Act Funding Allows Demolition of Power Houses Ahead of Schedule RICHLAND, WASH. - Today's safe and successful explosive demolition at

240

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 15, 2010 June 15, 2010 CX-003090: Categorical Exclusion Determination Perform Routine Access Road Maintenance within the McNary-Ross Number 1 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/15/2010 Location(s): Klickitat County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 11, 2010 More than $60 Million in Recovery Act Funding to Expand Local Energy Efficiency Efforts in 20 Communities Competitive block grants to support jobs, save money and increase energy independence June 10, 2010 CX-002767: Categorical Exclusion Determination Granite Mountain 3G Radio Station Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/10/2010 Location(s): Stevens County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2010 Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 15, 2002 October 15, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-112: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program October 6, 2002 EIS-0265-SA-92: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program October 2, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-110: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program October 1, 2002 EIS-0332: Mitigation Action Plan McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project September 30, 2002 EIS-025-SA-106: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program -106 SnoKing Tap to Monroe-Samamish Line) within Snohomish County, Washington September 26, 2002 EIS-0246-SA-29: Supplement Analysis Wildlife Mitigation Program, on the Spokane Indian Reservation, near Wellpinit, Stevens County, Washington September 26, 2002 EIS-0265-SA-90: Supplement Analysis

242

River Protection Project System Plan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

gallons (Mgal) 1 closure of radioactive waste contained in the Hanford Site waste tanks and 2 This version of the RPP System Plan (Rev. 6) is a major update of the previous...

243

Site Familiarization and Introduction of New Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Site Lead for the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms, February 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25 HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25 Site: Hanford - Office of River Production Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Familiarization and Introduction of New Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Site Lead Dates of Activity : 02/25/13 - 03/07/13 and 03/18-28/13 Report Preparer: Robert E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) assigned a new Site Lead to provide continuous oversight of activities at the Office of River Protection (ORP) Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) and tank farms. To gain familiarity with the site programs and personnel, the new Site Lead made

244

Site Familiarization and Introduction of New Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Site Lead for the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms, February 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25 HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25 Site: Hanford - Office of River Production Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Familiarization and Introduction of New Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Site Lead Dates of Activity : 02/25/13 - 03/07/13 and 03/18-28/13 Report Preparer: Robert E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) assigned a new Site Lead to provide continuous oversight of activities at the Office of River Protection (ORP) Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) and tank farms. To gain familiarity with the site programs and personnel, the new Site Lead made

245

Reintroduction of Lower Columbia River Chum Salmon into Duncan Creek, 2007 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed Lower Columbia River (LCR) chum salmon as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in March, 1999 (64 FR 14508, March 25, 1999). The listing was in response to the reduction in abundance from historical levels of more than one-half million returning adults to fewer than 10,000 present-day spawners. Harvest, habitat degradation, changes in flow regimes, riverbed movement and heavy siltation have been largely responsible for this decline. The timing of seasonal changes in river flow and water temperatures is perhaps the most critical factor in structuring the freshwater life history of this species. This is especially true of the population located directly below Bonneville Dam, where hydropower operations can block access to spawning sites, dewater redds, strand fry, cause scour or fill of redds and increase sedimentation of spawning gravels. Prior to 1997, only two chum salmon populations were recognized as genetically distinct in the Columbia River, although spawning had been documented in many Lower Columbia River tributaries. The first population was in the Grays River (RKm 34), a tributary of the Columbia River, and the second was a group of spawners utilizing the mainstem Columbia River just below Bonneville Dam (RKm 235) adjacent to Ives Island and in Hardy and Hamilton creeks. Using additional DNA samples, Small et al. (2006) grouped chum salmon spawning in the mainstem Columbia River and the Washington State tributaries into three groups: the Coastal, the Cascade and the Gorge. The Coastal group comprises those spawning in the Grays River, Skamokawa Creek and the broodstock used at the Sea Resources facility on the Chinook River. The Cascade group comprises those spawning in the Cowlitz (both summer and fall stocks), Kalama, Lewis, and East Fork Lewis rivers, with most supporting unique populations. The Gorge group comprises those spawning in the mainstem Columbia River from the I-205 Bridge up to Bonneville Dam and those spawning in Hamilton and Hardy creeks. Response to the federal ESA listing has been primarily through direct-recovery actions: reducing harvest, hatchery supplementation using local broodstock for populations at catastrophic risk, habitat restoration (including construction of spawning channels) and flow agreements to protect spawning and rearing areas. Both state and federal agencies have built controlled spawning areas. In 1998, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) began a chum salmon supplementation program using native stock on the Grays River. This program was expanded during 1999 - 2001 to include reintroduction into the Chinook River using eggs from the Grays River Supplementation Program. These eggs are incubated at the Grays River Hatchery, reared to release size at the Sea Resources Hatchery on the Chinook River, and the fry are released at the mouth of the Chinook River. Native steelhead, chum, and coho salmon are present in Duncan Creek, and are recognized as subpopulations of the Lower Gorge population, and are focal species in the Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board (LCFRB) plan. Steelhead, chum and coho salmon that spawn in Duncan Creek are listed as Threatened under the ESA. Duncan Creek is classified by the LCFRB plan as a watershed for intensive monitoring (LCFRB 2004). This project was identified in the 2004 Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) revised Biological Opinion (revised BiOp) to increase survival of chum salmon, 'BPA will continue to fund the program to re-introduce Columbia River chum salmon into Duncan Creek as long as NOAA Fisheries determines it to be an essential and effective contribution to reducing the risk of extinction for this ESU'. (USACE et al. 2004, page 85-86). The Governors Forum on Monitoring and Salmon Recovery and Watershed Health recommends one major population from each ESU have adult and juvenile monitoring. Duncan Creek chum salmon are identified in this plan to be intensively monitored. Planners recommended that a combination of natural and hatchery production

Hillson, Todd D. [Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

2009-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

246

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Washington Information Washington Information to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on AddThis.com... Washington Information This state page compiles information related to alternative fuels and advanced vehicles in Washington and includes new incentives and laws, alternative fueling station locations, truck stop electrification sites, fuel prices, and local points of contact.

247

River Corridor Closure Project Partnering Performance Agreement...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

- March 2009 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure Project - June 2012 Indoctrinating Subcontractors into the DOE Safety Culture and Expectations...

248

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Maryland)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

It is state policy to protect the outstanding scenic, geologic, ecologic, historic, recreational, agricultural, fish, wildlife, cultural, and other similar values of certain rivers and adjacent...

249

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 19, 2002 July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-95: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-94: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Covington District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-96: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-71: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, located in Umatilla and Sherman Counties, Oregon and Benton and Klickitat Counties, Washington July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-70: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 8, 2002 EIS-0189: Notice of Intent Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Disposal of Immobilized

250

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite, Liquid Waste Contract Savannah...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

2011 More Documents & Publications Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Site - May 2010 VPP Program Document Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Los...

251

Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Machine! |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Machine! Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Machine! February 20, 2012 - 5:00am Addthis Kristin Swineford Communication Specialist, Weatherization and Intergovernmental Programs For many of us, particularly those living east of the Mississippi river, President's Day weekend is not just a time to honor the birthday of our country's founding father, it's also the final escape from dreadfully cold and snowy days. However, those of us with pestering consumerist habits to feed always ensure our return to the metropolis by Monday, as the day is quickly taking on a new reputation: Second best shopping day of the year, after Black Friday. By now you're asking, "What does any of this have to do with energy

252

Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Machine! |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Machine! Thanks, George Washington, for the Energy Efficient Washing Machine! February 20, 2012 - 5:00am Addthis Kristin Swineford Communication Specialist, Weatherization and Intergovernmental Programs For many of us, particularly those living east of the Mississippi river, President's Day weekend is not just a time to honor the birthday of our country's founding father, it's also the final escape from dreadfully cold and snowy days. However, those of us with pestering consumerist habits to feed always ensure our return to the metropolis by Monday, as the day is quickly taking on a new reputation: Second best shopping day of the year, after Black Friday. By now you're asking, "What does any of this have to do with energy

253

Preliminary Notice of Violation, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC- EA-2007-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC, related to Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project at the Idaho National Laboratory

254

River Thames River Thames  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

West Kent House Penge East Lower Sydenham Forest Hill Honor Oak Park Crofton Park Nunhead New CrossC BD A River Thames River Thames Waterloo & City Southwark Northwood Northwood Hills North Harrow Harrow- on-the-Hill Northwick Park Harrow & Wealdstone Headstone Lane Pinner Kenton Stanmore Canons Park

Delmotte, Nausicaa

255

River Thames River Thames  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

River Thames River Thames Du Cane Road Wood Lane Wood Lane North Pole Road Barlby Road Highlever Street Acton Market Place Acton Horn Lane Wood Lane Du Cane Road Wood Lane South Africa Road White City for BBC Television Centre Wood Lane Ariel Way Wood Lane Shepherd's Bush Green Shepherd's Bush Green

256

Washington Nuclear Profile - Power Plants  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Washington nuclear power plants, summer capacity and net generation, 2010" "Plant nametotal reactors","Summer capacity (mw)","Net generation (thousand mwh)","Share of State...

257

FUPWG Fall 2009 Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Washington update at the FUPWG meeting, held on November 18-19, 2009.

258

Recent developments: Washington focus  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Congress reconvened on January 23, but most of Washington`s January new involves the Administration. DOE sent two letters to USEC customers, awarded a contract for the independent financial review of the enrichment program, and released a plan for demonstrating AVLIS by 1992. A General Accounting Office (GAO) report investigating the impact of imports of Soviet EUP into the US was made public. Both Congress and the administration are reportedly considering a full-scope US-Soviet Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation. Finally, published reports indicate Congress may consider ending the customs user fee which levies a charge of 0.17% on the value of all imported goods. The fee is felt to violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and is not based on recovering actual Customs costs for processing a good. The fee brings the Treasury over $700 million per year, but the business community plans to lobby hard for its outright elimination or a change in authority to collect the fee based on actual costs.

NONE

1990-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Office of River Protection - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at the Office of River Protection The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in an Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC). The EM-23 review included selected Office of River Protection programs at the Hanford Site. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection - December 2010 More Documents & Publications Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

260

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- EA-2002-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Safety Basis and Radiation Protection Violations at the Savannah River Site, March 19, 2002 (EA-2002-01)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Successes, Failures and Suggested Future Directions for Ecosystem Restoration of the Middle Sacramento River, California  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2001. River restoration and flood protection: controversy orflows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river.status of terrestrial and flood- plain resources (including

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Departmentaf Energy Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Departmentaf Departmentaf Energy Washington, DC 20585 MAR 4 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR: James H. Chafin, AL Robert Fisher, CH Steven Hamel, OR William Daubenspeck, LL James Hanley, SAN Robert Southworth, RL Harold Dixon, SR \ Lisa Jarr, FETC"/"',,,-' ( ~ ( ) ( I C{ \'"~V FROM: Paul A. Gottlieb'<,. ~ ' \ Assistant General Counsel . for Technology Transfer / and Intellectual Property SUBJECT: U.S. Competitiveness Provision. Except for the cases discussed further below, attached is the U.S. Competitiveness provision which you should begin providing as our initial negotiating position to inventors/contractors requesting identified and, advance patent waivers. Of course, it is not· expected that every inventor/contractor will agree to the exact language in the provision, in which case modifications to the provision can be made. In those cases where substantial changes are contemplated,

263

Washington, DC,20585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

>/gGq ' >/gGq ' ,, ' .. Department of Edgy Washington, DC,20585 ,I ' , APR 0 4 1995 The Honorable Patrick Ungaro 26 S. Phelps Street Youngstown, Ohio 44503 .' Dear );layor.Ungaro: Secretary of'Energy Hazel O'Leary has announced a new approach to openness in the Oepartment of Energy (DOE) and its coannunications with the public. In support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the,enclosed information related to the former Ajax-Hagnethermic C,orp. site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE's predecessoragencies. This information is~provided for your information, use, and retention. DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identificationof sites used by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and, where it has authority, performing-

264

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 12, 2003 February 12, 2003 EIS-0286: Notice of Intent Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, WA February 12, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-121: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 10, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-120: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Benton County, Washington January 31, 2003 EIS-0325: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Schultz-Hanford Transmission Line Project January 29, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-119: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish-Murray No. 1 Transmission Line January 27, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-118: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Holcomb-Naselle 115kV,

265

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-005337: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 24, 2011 Online Registration Dates Set for 2011 Hanford Tours RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will open online registration on March 8 for tours of the Hanford Site and on March 15 for B Reactor-specific tours. February 24, 2011 Praveen Thallapally | photo courtesy of Pacific Northwest National Lab 10 Questions for a Materials Chemist: Praveen Thallapally Dr. Thallapally gave us an inside look at how he's working to advance carbon capture and geothermal technologies, developing a new class of

266

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 16, 2004 January 16, 2004 EIS-0246-SA-37: Supplement Analysis Wildlife Mitigation Program, On the Spokane Indian Reservation, near Wellpinit, Stevens County, Washington November 10, 2003 EIS-0349: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project October 2, 2003 EA-0307-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Colville Resident Trout Hatchery Project Supplement Analysis September 5, 2003 EIS-0349: Draft Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project July 21, 2003 EIS-0317: Record of Decision Kangley-Echo Lake Transmission Line Project July 14, 2003 EIS-1069-SA-07: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Kilickitat Fisheries Project, Noxious Weed Control at Cle Elum and Jack Creek, Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility and Jack Creek

267

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 17, 2001 August 17, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-23: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 17, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-22: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, King and Snohomish Counties, WA, in the Snohomish Region August 14, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-59: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program August 7, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-58: Supplement Anlalysis Watershed Program - Asotin Creek Channel, Floodplain and Riparian Restoration August 2, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-20: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 1, 2001 EIS-0245-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 24, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-17: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program

268

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 19, 2013 June 19, 2013 A Hanford site volunteer helps a Boy Scout practice the Pull, Aim, Squeeze, Sweep, or PASS, fire extinguishing technique at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center in Richland. Local Scouts Train with Hanford Safety Experts - 52 Boy Scouts Earn Merit Badges at the HAMMER Training Facility RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford site services contractor Mission Support Alliance (MSA) hosted a unique opportunity for 52 local Boy Scouts at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center during two consecutive weekends recently. June 14, 2013 EA-1562-SA-1: Supplement Analysis Final Environmental Assessment of Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington June 4, 2013

269

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 2, 2004 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2 BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project Volume 2 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Figures BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendices BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project June 23, 2004 EIS-0026-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Commingled Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 7, 2004 EIS-0169-SA-08: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington March 12, 2004 EA-1486: Final Environmental Assessment East and West Diversion Screening Proposal Methow Valley Irrigation District Project

270

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 14, 2001 December 14, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-35: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program December 3, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-72: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter Creek/Plum Creek Land Acquisition Phase II December 3, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-34: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program November 15, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-32: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Walla Walla County, Washington November 15, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-69: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program October 29, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-71: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Duncan Creek Channel Rehabilitation Project October 23, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-70: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter

271

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2006 November 29, 2006 EIS-0183: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Windy Point Wind Energy Project June 26, 2006 EIS-0397: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement Lyle Falls Fishway Project May 1, 2006 EIS-0384: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chief Joseph Hatchery Program March 31, 2006 EA-1547: Finding of No Significant Impact Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site March 1, 2006 EA-1547: Final Environmental Assessment Sodium Residual Reaction/Removal and Other Deactivation Work Activities, Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 17, 2006 EIS-0391: Notice to Extend Scoping Period Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA

272

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 5, 2002 September 5, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-107: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program September 2, 2002 EIS-0169-SA-05: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington August 30, 2002 EIS-0332: Final Environmental Impact Statement McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project August 29, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-99: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Final Environmental Impact Statement - Olympia-Grand Coulee No.1 August 22, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-105: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 21, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-104: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 1, 2002 EIS-0344: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement

273

Microsoft Word - washington.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Washington Washington NERC Region(s) ....................................................................................................... WECC Primary Energy Source........................................................................................... Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) ....................................................................... 30,478 10 Electric Utilities ...................................................................................................... 26,498 5 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power ................................ 3,979 26 Net Generation (megawatthours) ........................................................................... 103,472,729 15

274

Biofuels in Oregon and Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PNNL-17351 Biofuels in Oregon and Washington A Business Case Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges Prepared by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory #12;#12;Biofuels in Oregon and Washington, particularly in light of the recent growth experienced by the biofuels industry in the Midwest. Policymakers

275

Washington | Building Energy Codes Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington Washington Last updated on 2013-11-05 Current News The Washington State Building Code Council recently completed deliberations on adoption and amendment of the 2012 codes. This includes adoption of the 2012 IECC with state amendments. The new codes became effective July 1, 2013. Commercial Residential Code Change Current Code State Specific Amendments / Additional State Code Information WA 2012 Nonresidential Codes Approved Compliance Tools Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Tools Approximate Energy Efficiency Equivalent to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Effective Date 07/01/2013 Adoption Date 02/01/2013 Code Enforcement Mandatory DOE Determination ASHRAE 90.1-2007: Yes ASHRAE 90.1-2010: Yes Washington DOE Determination Letter, May 31, 2013 Washington State Certification of Commercial and Residential Building Energy Codes

276

An Inside Look at River Corridor | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

An Inside Look at River Corridor An Inside Look at River Corridor An Inside Look at River Corridor July 16, 2012 - 1:04pm Addthis "River Corridor" provides viewers with a look at the cleanup of hundreds of contaminated buildings and more than one thousand areas where soil was contaminated along the 50-mile stretch of the Columbia River that flows through the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. Amanda Scott Amanda Scott Former Managing Editor, Energy.gov In the seventh chapter of The Handford Story, the Energy Department takes a look at the River Corridor -- a 50-mile stretch of the Columbia River that flows through the Hanford site in southeast Washington State. This video provides you with an insiders look at the cleanup of contaminated buildings and soil. Watch the video above to get a look inside the Energy

277

BP Energy Company (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Company (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name: BP Energy Company Place: Washington References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File220101 EIA Form 861 Data...

278

Washington: Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Washington: Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves 2012 R&D 100 Award Washington: Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves 2012 R&D 100 Award February...

279

Washington -- SEP Data Dashboard | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Data Dashboard Washington -- SEP Data Dashboard The data dashboard for Washington -- SEP, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program. bbnpbban0004447pmcdashboardy...

280

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 29, 2003 April 29, 2003 EA-1367: Final Environmental Assessment White Sturgeon Mitigation and Restoration in the Columbia & Snake River Upstream from Bonneville Dam April 21, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-147: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program April 11, 2003 EIS-0286: EPA Notice of Availability of the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program April 8, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-143: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program April 8, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-144: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program April 3, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-138: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program April 3, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-139: Supplement Analysis

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 8, 2012 March 8, 2012 Fifth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public: Chapter Dedicated to Potential Future Uses of the Hanford Site RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy is releasing the fifth chapter of The Hanford Story video series to the public today. March 1, 2012 The new resin was installed at the 100-DX Groundwater Treatment Facility, where it operated over one year without a single resin change. New Resin Improves Efficiency, Reduces Costs in Hanford Site Groundwater Treatment RICHLAND, Wash. - A new resin EM, the Richland Operations Office, and contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company are using in contaminated groundwater treatment is expected to increase efficiency and reduce costs in the operation of pump-and-treat facilities along the Columbia River at

282

Columbia River Component Data Gap Analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Data Gap Analysis report documents the results of a study conducted by Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) to compile and reivew the currently available surface water and sediment data for the Columbia River near and downstream of the Hanford Site. This Data Gap Analysis study was conducted to review the adequacy of the existing surface water and sediment data set from the Columbia River, with specific reference to the use of the data in future site characterization and screening level risk assessments.

L. C. Hulstrom

2007-10-23T23:59:59.000Z

283

Transformative Wave Technologies Kent, Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transformative Wave Technologies Kent, Washington www.transformativewave.com #12;#12;North America are shifted to off peak times #12;#12;Transformative Wave Technologies www.transformativewave.com #12

California at Davis, University of

284

Genetic and Phenotype [Phenotypic] Catalog of Native Resident Trout of the interior Columbia River Basin : FY-99 Report : Populations of the Pend Oreille, Kettle, and Sanpoil River Basins of Colville National Forest.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 1994 Fish and Wildlife Program of the Northwest Power Planning Council specifies the recovery and preservation of population health of native resident fishes of the Columbia River Basin. Among the native resident species of concern are interior rainbow trout of the Columbia River redband subspecies Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri 1 and westslope cutthroat trout O. clarki lewisi. The westslope cutthroat trout has been petitioned for listing under the U. S. Endangered Species Act (American Wildlands et al. 1997). Before at-risk populations can be protected, their presence and status must be established. Where introgression from introduced species is a concern, as in the case of both westslope cutthroat trout and redband rainbow trout, genetic issues must be addressed as well. As is true with native trout elsewhere in the western United States (Behnke 1992), most of the remaining pure populations of these species in the Columbia River Basin are in relatively remote headwater reaches. The objective of this project is to photo-document upper Columbia Basin native resident trout populations in Washington, and to ascertain their species or subspecies identity and relative genetic purity using a nonlethal DNA technique. FY-99 was year two of a five-year project in which we conducted field visits to remote locations to seek out and catalog these populations. In FY-99 we worked in collaboration with the Colville National Forest and Kalispel Indian Tribe to catalog populations in the northeastern corner of Washington State.

Trotter, Patrick C.

2001-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Recovery Act State Memos Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION TABLE.............................................................................. 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................... 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY ............................................................................................. 6

286

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Bainbridge Bainbridge Island, Washington to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

287

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Better Buildings Partners Better Buildings Partners Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA

288

Screening assessment and requirements for a comprehensive assessment: Volume 1, Draft. Columbia River comprehensive impact assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To evaluate the impact to the Columbia River from the Hanford Site-derived contaminants, the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Washington State Department of Ecology initiated a study referred to as the Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment (CRCIA). To address concerns about the scope and direction of CRCIA as well as enhance regulator, tribal, stockholder, and public involvement, the CRCIA Management Team was formed in August 1995. The Team agreed to conduct CRCIA using a phased approach. The initial phase, includes two components: 1) a screening assessment to evaluate the potential impact to the river, resulting from current levels of Hanford-derived contaminants in order to support decisions on Interim Remedial Measures, and 2) a definition of the essential work remaining to provide an acceptable comprehensive river impact assessment. The screening assessment is described in Part I of this report. The essential work remaining is Part II of this report. The objective of the screening assessment is to identify areas where the greatest potential exists for adverse effects on humans or the environment. Part I of this report discusses the scope, technical approach, and results of the screening assessment. Part II defines a new paradigm for predecisional participation by those affected by Hanford cleanup decisions.

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Upper White River Watershed Alliance Upper White River Watershed Alliance (UWRWA)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Upper White River Watershed Alliance Upper White River Watershed Alliance (UWRWA) P.O. Box 2065 integrity of the White River ecosystem. To successfully accomplish the vision of UWRWA, a 16-county was formed. It exists to improve and protect water quality on a watershed basis in the larger Upper White

290

Department.,of Energy Washington; DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

,of Energy ,of Energy Washington; DC' 20585 JAN 1 1 1995 / .,, .- L ., The Honorable Thomas Menino ', 1 City Hall Square Boston, Massachusetts 02201 ,'. " p' ifi.. ' . .' b I,' \ Dear.Mayor.Me$ino: DOE's Formerly Util,ized for identification of sites.used by*DOEfs predecessor' agencies, determining, their current radiological condition and, where it has authority, performing remedial action to cleanup sites to meet current radiologicalprotection requirements.~ A conservative set of.technical evaluation guidelines4s used in these investigat~ions' toTassure protection of public health, safety and the .environment. Where DOE does not have authority.for proceeding, the available site information is forwarded to the appropriate Federal or State Agency,. DOE studied the historical records of the former ,Tracerlab, Inc. sitei'and it

291

The State of the Columbia River Basin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, and Washington. The Act authorized the Council to serve as a comprehensive planning agency for energy policy and fish and wildlife policy in the Columbia River Basin and to inform the public about energy and fish Overview 11 Sixth Northwest Power Plan boosts energy efficiency, renewable energy, Energy efficiency

292

Salt River Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Salt River Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Salt River Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program Salt River Electric - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Sealing Your Home Heating & Cooling Construction Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Other Ventilation Heat Pumps Program Info State Kentucky Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Varies by technology Provider Salt River Electric Cooperative Salt River Electric serves as the rural electric provider in Kentucky's Bullitt, Nelson, Spencer, and Washington counties. Residential customers are eligible for a variety of cash incentives for energy efficiency. The Touchstone Energy Home Program provides a rebate of up to $250 to customers

293

Preliminary Notice of Violation, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC - M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC - EA-2007-03 Preliminary Notice of Violation, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC - EA-2007-03 June 14, 2007 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC, related to Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project at the Idaho National Laboratory This letter refers to the investigation of events at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project (ARP) by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement. The investigation summary report, Multiple Radiological Protection Program Deficiencies and Safety Culture Concerns, was provided to you in a letter dated February 20, 2007. An enforcement conference to discuss these findings was held on March

294

Preliminary Notice of Violation, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC - CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC - EA-2007-03 Preliminary Notice of Violation, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC - EA-2007-03 June 14, 2007 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC, related to Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project at the Idaho National Laboratory This letter refers to the investigation of events at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project (ARP) by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement. The investigation summary report, Multiple Radiological Protection Program Deficiencies and Safety Culture Concerns, was provided to you in a letter dated February 20, 2007. An enforcement conference to discuss these findings was held on March

295

Washington Biodiesel | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Logo: Washington Biodiesel Name Washington Biodiesel Address 3401 Fremont Avenue N. Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98103 Sector Biofuels Product Aims to grow biodiesel feedstock Website http://wabiodiesel.com/ Coordinates 47.6495905°, -122.3497956° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6495905,"lon":-122.3497956,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

296

Geologic map of the Hood River Quadrangle, Washington and Oregon  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The report is comprised of a 1:100,000 scale geologic map and accompanying text. The text consists of unit descriptions, a table of age dates, a table of major element geochemistry, correlation diagram, and a source of mapping diagram. (ACR)

Korosec, M.A. (comp.)

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Why sequence Bacteria from Lake Washington?  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

bacteria from Lake Washington? bacteria from Lake Washington? Previous collaborations between the University of Washington team and the DOE JGI involving both single genome and metagenomic sequencing have greatly enhanced the community's ability to explore the diversity of bacteria functionally active in metabolism of single carbon compounds, known as methylotrophs, isolated from Lake Washington (Seattle, Washington) sediment. Sequencing genomes of 50 methylotroph isolates from the Lake Washington will further enhance the methylotroph community knowledge database providing a much higher level of resolution of global (meta)transcriptomic and (meta)proteomic analyses, as well as species interaction studies, informing a better understanding of biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen.

298

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site- January 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building, Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Selected Aspects of Fire Protection System Design

299

Type B Accident Investigation At Washington Closure Hanford,...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Investigation At Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Employee Fall Injury on July 1, 2009, At The 336 Building, Hanford Site, Washington Type B Accident Investigation At Washington...

300

Washington State Department of Transportation | Open Energy Informatio...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington State Department of Transportation Abbreviation: WDOT Place: Olympia, Washington Phone Number: 360-705-7000 Website: http:www.wsdot.wa.gov References: Washington...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Digging Begins at Hazardous Hanford Burial Ground - River Corridor  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Digging Begins at Hazardous Hanford Burial Ground - River Corridor Digging Begins at Hazardous Hanford Burial Ground - River Corridor Contractor Spent Two Years Preparing to Remediate 618-10 Digging Begins at Hazardous Hanford Burial Ground - River Corridor Contractor Spent Two Years Preparing to Remediate 618-10 August 3, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Cameron Hardy, DOE Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov 509-376-5365 Todd Nelson, Washington Closure media@wch-rcc.com 509-372-9097 RICHLAND, WASH. - After careful preparation and characterization, the Department of Energy's (DOE) River Corridor contractor, Washington Closure Hanford, has begun remediation of one of the most hazardous burial grounds tackled to date on the Hanford Site's River Corridor. The $57 million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act project began with nearly two years of preparation and characterization before reaching their

302

National Register of Historic Places multiple property documentation form -- Historic, archaeological, and traditional cultural properties of the Hanford Site, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy`s Hanford Site encompasses an area of 560 square miles on the Columbia River in southeastern Washington. Since 1943, the Hanford Site has existed as a protected area for activities primarily related to the production of radioactive materials for national defense uses. For cultural resources on the Hanford Site, establishment of the nuclear reservation as a high security area, with public access restricted, has resulted in a well-protected status, although no deliberate resource protection measures were in effect to mitigate effects of facilities construction and associated activities. Thus, the Hanford Site contains an extensive record of aboriginal archaeological sites and Native American cultural properties, along with pre-Hanford Euro-American sites (primarily archaeological in nature with the removal of most pre-1943 structures), and a considerable number of Manhattan Project/Cold War era buildings and structures. The recent mission change from production to clean up and disposal of DOE lands created a critical need for development and implementation of new and different cultural resource management strategies. DOE-RL has undertaken a preservation planning effort for the Hanford Site. The intent of this Plan is to enable DOE-RL to organize data and develop goals, objectives, and priorities for the identification, evaluation, registration, protection, preservation, and enhancement of the Site`s historical and cultural properties. Decisions made about the identification, evaluation, registration and treatment of historic properties are most aptly made when relationships between individual properties and other similar properties are considered. The historic context and the multiple property documentation (NTD) process provides DOE-RL the organizational framework for these decisions. Once significant patterns are identified, contexts developed, and expected properties are defined, the NTD process provides the foundation for future decisions concerning the management of significant cultural resources on the Hanford Site.

Nickens, P.R.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Technical summary of groundwater quality protection program at the Savannah River Site, 1952--1986. Volume 1, Site geohydrology and waste sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides information regarding the status of and groundwater quality at the waste sites at the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS). Specific information provided for each waste site at SRS includes its location, size, inventory (when known), and history. Many waste sites at SRS are considered to be of little environmental concern because they contain nontoxic or inert material such as construction rubble and debris. Other waste sites, however, either are known to have had an effect on groundwater quality or are suspected of having the potential to affect groundwater. Monitoring wells have been installed at most of these sites; monitoring wells are scheduled for installation at the remaining sites. Results of the groundwater analyses from these monitoring wells, presented in the appendices, are used in the report to help identify potential contaminants of concern, if any, at each waste site. The list of actions proposed for each waste site in Christensen and Gordon`s 1983 report are summarized, and an update is provided for each site. Planned actions for the future are also outlined.

Heffner, J.D. [ed.] [Exploration Resources, Inc., Athens, GA (United States)

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

Workers Demolish Reactor Support Facility as Part of River Corridor Contract  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. EMs Richland Operations Office and cleanup contractor Washington Closure Hanford recently completed the cleanout and demolition of the last reactor support facility as part of the River Corridor Closure Contract.

305

Transport of Atmospheric Aerosol by Gap Winds in the Columbia River Gorge  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Typical diurnal wind patterns and their relationship to transport of atmospheric aerosol in the Columbia River gorge of Oregon and Washington are addressed in this paper. The measurement program included measurements of light scattering by ...

Mark C. Green; Jin Xu; Narendra Adhikari

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

EIS-0456: Cushman Hydroelectric Project, Tacoma, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS is for the design and construction of certain components of the Cushman Hydroelectric Project in Mason County, Washington.

307

Tucannon River Temperature Study, Prepared for : Watershed Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 35.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a temperature analysis of the Tucannon River completed for the WRIA 35 Planning Unit. The Tucannon River is located in southeastern Washington and flows approximately 100 kilometers (km) (62 miles) from the Blue Mountains to the Snake River. High water temperature in the Tucannon River has been identified as a limiting factor for salmonid fish habitat (Columbia Conservation District, 2004). Several segments of the Tucannon River are included on Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) 303(d) list of impaired waterbodies due to temperature. Ecology is currently conducting scoping for a temperature Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study of the Tucannon River. The WRIA 35 Planning Unit retained HDR Engineering to evaluate water temperature in the Tucannon River. The project objectives are: (1) Review recent and historic data and studies to characterize temperature conditions in the river; (2) Perform field studies and analyses to identify and quantify heating and cooling processes in the river; (3) Develop and calibrate a computer temperature model to determine the sources of heat to the Tucannon River and to predict the temperature of the river that would occur with increased natural riparian shading assuming the current river morphology; (4) Evaluate differences in river temperatures between current and improved riparian shading during the 'critical' period - low river flows and high temperatures; and (5) Determine the potential benefits of riparian shading as a mechanism to decrease river temperature.

HDR Engineering.

2006-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

308

Secretary Moniz's Remarks at the Washington Auto Show-- As Delivered  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary Moniz's remarks, as delivered, at the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, D.C. on January 22, 2015.

309

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CentralCharacterizationProject(CCP)attheIdahoNational Laboratory(INL) (InspectionNumberEPA-INL-RH-CCP-06.06-08). In JuneandAugust2006,EPA conductedabaselineinspectionofINL-CCP's RH TRU wastecharacterizationprogramto assessthecharacterizationofRH TRU wastein,announcingEPA's proposedapprovalof theRH TRU wastecharacterizationprogramat INL-CCP. This Federal

310

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Environmental Protection Environmental Health & Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

altering any refrigeration charge to UW equipment. Information about the company and all agents who perform of specifications for selecting new equipment that uses refrigerant and for the management of refrigerant from compounds used as refrigerants into the atmosphere while maintaining, servicing, repairing or disposing

Wilcock, William

311

UNITED STATESENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. PaulDetwiler,Acting Manager CarlsbadFieldOffice U.S.Departmentof Energy P.O.Box 3090 Carlsbad,L.H., andY. Xiong. 2003b.Calculationof OrganicLigandConcentrationsfor the WIPP ComplianceRecertificationApplication.Unpublishedanalysisreport.Carlsbad in WIPPBrines.Unpublishedmemorandumto L.H. Brush,July 25,2002.Carlsbad,NM: Sandia National Laboratories

312

Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River - 13603  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In south-central Washington State, the Columbia River flows through the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site. A primary objective of the Hanford Site cleanup mission is protection of the Columbia River, through remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater that resulted from its weapons production mission. Within the Columbia River system, surface water, sediment, and biota samples related to potential Hanford Site hazardous substance releases have been collected since the start of Hanford operations. The impacts from release of Hanford Site radioactive substances to the Columbia River in areas upstream, within, and downstream of the Hanford Site boundary have been previously investigated as mandated by the U.S. Department of Energy requirements under the Atomic Energy Act. The Remedial Investigation Work Plan for Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River [1] was issued in 2008 to initiate assessment of the impacts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 [2]. The work plan established a phased approach to characterize contaminants, assess current risks, and determine whether or not there is a need for any cleanup actions. Field investigation activities over a 120-mile stretch of the Columbia River began in October 2008 and were completed in 2010. Sampled media included surface water, pore water, surface and core sediment, island soil, and fish (carp, walleye, whitefish, sucker, small-mouth bass, and sturgeon). Information and sample results from the field investigation were used to characterize current conditions within the Columbia River and assess whether current conditions posed a risk to ecological or human receptors that would merit additional study or response actions under CERCLA. The human health and ecological risk assessments are documented in reports that were published in 2012 [3, 4]. Conclusions from the risk assessment reports are being summarized and integrated with remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) reports developed for upland areas, riparian areas, and groundwater in the Hanford Site River Corridor. The RI/FS reports will evaluate the impacts to soil, groundwater, and river sediments and lead to proposed cleanup actions and records of decision to address releases from the Hanford Site reactor operations. (authors)

Lerch, J.A.; Hulstrom, L.C. [Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Richland, Washington 99354 (United States)] [Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Richland, Washington 99354 (United States); Sands, J.P. [U.S Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [U.S Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 22, 2013 CX-010734: Categorical Exclusion Determination Covington District Culvert Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2013 CX-010735: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell No.5 Dead End Insulator Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 24, 2013 CX-011171: Categorical Exclusion Determination Longview and Tillamook Substation Communication Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 09/24/2013

314

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Seattle, Seattle, Washington to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO NE | NV | NH | NJ | NY NC | OH | OR | PA | SC TN | TX | VT | VI | VA

315

Protection 1 Protection 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Protection 1 Protection 1 Butler W. Lampson Xerox Corporation Palo Alto, California Abstract is a malicious act or accident that crashes the system--- this might be considered the ultimate degradation. 1, p 437. It was reprinted in ACM Operating Systems Rev. 8, 1 (Jan. 1974), p 18. This version

Lampson, Butler W.

316

Protection 1 Protection1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Protection 1 Protection1 Butler W. Lampson Xerox Corporation Palo Alto, California Abstract is a malicious act or accident that crashes the system-- this might be considered the ultimate degradation. 1, p 437. It was reprinted in ACM Operating Systems Rev. 8, 1 (Jan. 1974), p 18. This version

Lampson, Butler W.

317

Washington's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Contents Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district Avista Utilities Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district Washington State University Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district Itron ReliOn Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district Kettle Falls Biomass Facility

318

Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 5, 2011 December 5, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIAL OFFICERS AND HEADS OF FIELD ORGANIZATIONS FROM: SUBJECT: !~::o~~~ral Cou;;(} '/-- Reminder Regarding Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) Planning Summaries Early involvement by senior management in the NEP A planning process is a key component of a successful NEP A compliance program. Thus, Department of Energy (DOE) Order 451.1 B requires that each Secretarial Officer and Head of a Field Organization submit an annual NEP A planning summary to the General Counsel by January 31 of each year and make it available to the public. Preparation of these summaries helps ensure that NEP A activities are aligned with program priorities and that resources are allocated to enable timely completion ofNEPA

319

Oversight Reports - Savannah River Site | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Site Savannah River Site Oversight Reports - Savannah River Site September 4, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - August 2013 Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Safety Basis and Design Development. August 5, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office - July 2013 Review of the Employee Concerns Program at the Savannah River Operations Office July 25, 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design [HIAR SRS-2013-5-07] April 22, 2013 Independent Activity Report, Savannah River Site - March 2013

320

EIS-0241: Hood River Fisheries Program | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1: Hood River Fisheries Program 1: Hood River Fisheries Program EIS-0241: Hood River Fisheries Program SUMMARY This EIS evaluates a BPA proposal to protect and improve anadromous salmonid populations in the Hood River Basin. These actions are proposed in an attempt to mitigate the losses of fish and wildlife associated with the construction and operation of Federal hydro-power facilities in the Columbia River Basin. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD December 4, 2008 EIS-0241-SA-02: Supplement Analysis for the Hood River Fisheries Project Supplement Analysis for the Hood River Fisheries Project May 16, 2005 EIS-0241-SA-01: Supplement Analysis for the Hood River Fisheries Project, Hood River County, Oregon Supplement Analysis for the Hood River Fisheries Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Washington State solar loan assistance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Qualifying citizens of Washington State can receive passive solar investment subsidies funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) if their design is certified by a licensed engineer or architect. The pilot program operates through 25 credit unions. It is intended to promote energy conservation and to stimulate construction and small-business employment. Requirements for the space heating system are an area for solar collection, an absorber, storage mass, a method of heat distribution, and a device to regulate heat. The design can be either for new construction or as a retrofit.

Kinnear, N.; James, J.

1984-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Malheur River Wildlife Mitigation Project, Annual Report 2003.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hydropower development within the Columbia and Snake River Basins has significantly affected riparian, riverine, and adjacent upland habitats and the fish and wildlife species dependent upon them. Hydroelectric dams played a major role in the extinction or major loss of both anadromous and resident salmonid populations and altered instream and adjacent upland habitats, water quality, and riparian/riverine function. Hydroelectric facility construction and inundation directly affected fish and wildlife species and habitats. Secondary and tertiary impacts including road construction, urban development, irrigation, and conversion of native habitats to agriculture, due in part to the availability of irrigation water, continue to affect wildlife and fish populations throughout the Columbia and Snake River Basins. Fluctuating water levels resulting from facility operations have created exposed sand, cobble, and/or rock zones. These zones are generally devoid of vegetation with little opportunity to re-establish riparian plant communities. To address the habitat and wildlife losses, the United States Congress in 1980 passed the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Act) (P.L. 96-501), which authorized the states of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington to create the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council). The Act directed the Council to prepare a program in conjunction with federal, state, and tribal wildlife resource authorities to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife species affected by the construction, inundation and operation of hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin (NPPC 2000). Under the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Program), the region's fish and wildlife agencies, tribes, non-government organizations (NGOs), and the public propose fish and wildlife projects that address wildlife and fish losses resulting from dam construction and subsequent inundation. As directed by the Council, project proposals are subjected to a rigorous review process prior to receiving final approval. An eleven-member panel of scientists referred to as the Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) examines project proposals. The ISRP recommends project approval based on scientific merit. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA), Council staff, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and subbasin groups also review project proposals to ensure each project meets regional and subbasin goals and objectives. The Program also includes a public involvement component that gives the public an opportunity to provide meaningful input on management proposals. After a thorough review, the Burns Paiute Tribe (BPT) acquired the Malheur River Mitigation Project (Project) with BPA funds to compensate, in part, for the loss of fish and wildlife resources in the Columbia and Snake River Basins and to address a portion of the mitigation goals identified in the Council's Program (NPPC 2000).

Ashley, Paul

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Washington/Geothermal | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Washington/Geothermal < Washington Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Print PDF Washington Geothermal General Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Power Projects Under Development in Washington No geothermal projects listed. Add a geothermal project. Operational Geothermal Power Plants in Washington No geothermal power plants listed. Add a geothermal energy generation facility. Geothermal Areas in Washington Mean Capacity (MW) Number of Plants Owners Geothermal Region Baker Hot Spring Geothermal Area 22.7 MW22,700 kW 22,700,000 W 22,700,000,000 mW 0.0227 GW 2.27e-5 TW Cascades Geothermal Region

324

PacifiCorp (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington) Washington) (Redirected from Pacific Power (Washington)) Jump to: navigation, search Name PacifiCorp Place Washington Service Territory Washington Website www.pacificorp.com/index. Green Button Reference Page www.pacificpower.net/abou Green Button Implemented Yes Utility Id 14354 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. PacifiCorp consists of three business units. Pacific Power is a subsidiary of PacifiCorp which delivers electricity to customers in Oregon, Washington and California; it is headquartered in Portland, OR. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0723/kWh

325

FUPWG Spring 2010 Providence: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers an update on Washington and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Providence, Rhode Island.

326

Washington TRU Solutions Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Solutions Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington TRU Solutions, Inc. Place: Carlsbad, New Mexico Zip: 88220 Product: New Mexico-based managing and operating contractor...

327

Bonneville Power Administration, Oregon Energy Northwest, Washington...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Northwest, Washington; Wholesale Electric Primary Credit Analyst: David N Bodek, New York (1) 212-438-7969; david.bodek@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Jeffrey M...

328

Washington Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Permit Application Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- Permit ApplicationPermit Application: Washington Joint Aquatic...

329

USDA Rural Development Washington State Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is hosting a Washington Rural Development Workshop. Speakers will cover local and regional broadband initiatives program and broadband success stories,...

330

Crews repair transmission lines after Washington wildfire  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Privacy Publications Tribal Affairs Newsroom Search News Articles... Search Crews repair transmission lines after Washington wildfire 662014 12:00 AM Tweet Page Content BPA...

331

Washington: a guide to geothermal energy development  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Washington's geothermal potential is discussed. The following topics are covered: exploration, drilling, utilization, legal and institutional setting, and economic factors of direct use projects. (MHR)

Bloomquist, R.G.; Basescu, N.; Higbee, C.; Justus, D.; Simpson, S.

1980-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin's (ICPRB) mission is to enhance, protect, and conserve the water and associated land resources of the Potomac River and its tributaries through regional and interstate

333

Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fsh Habitat Enhancement Project : 2000 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fish Habitat Enhancement Project continued to identify impacted stream reaches throughout the Umatilla River Basin for habitat improvements during the 2000 project period. Public outreach efforts, biological and physical monitoring, and continued development of a Umatilla River Basin Watershed Assessment assisted the project in fostering public cooperation, targeting habitat deficiencies and determining habitat recovery measures. Habitat enhancement projects continued to be maintained on 44 private properties, four riparian easements and one in-stream enhancement agreement were secured, two new projects implemented and two existing projects improved to enhance anadromous fish habitat and natural fisheries production capabilities in the Umatilla River Basin. New project locations included sites on the mid Umatilla River and Buckaroo Creek. Improvements were implemented at existing project sites on the upper Umatilla River and Wildhorse Creek. A stream bank stabilization project was implemented at approximately River Mile 37.4 Umatilla River to stabilize 760 feet of eroding stream bank and improve in-stream habitat diversity. Habitat enhancements at this site included construction of six rock barbs with one large conifer root wad incorporated into each barb, stinging approximately 10,000 native willow cuttings, planting 195 tubling willows and 1,800 basin wildrye grass plugs, and seeding 40 pounds of native grass seed. Staff time to assist in development of a subcontract and fence materials were provided to establish eight spring sites for off-stream watering and to protect wetlands within the Buckaroo Creek Watershed. A gravel bar was moved and incorporated into an adjacent point bar to reduce stream energy and stream channel confinement within the existing project area at River Mile 85 Umatilla River. Approximately 10,000 native willow cuttings were stung and trenched into the stream channel margins and stream banks, and 360 basin wildrye grass plugs planted and 190 pounds of native grass seed broadcast on terraces between River Mile 10 and 12.5 within the existing Wildhorse Creek Project Area. Approximately 70 pounds of native grasses were seeded in the existing McKay Creek Project Area at approximately River Mile 21.5. Financial and in-kind cost share assistance was provided by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Fish and Wildlife Federation and the Umatilla National Forest for the enhancements at River Mile 37.4 Umatilla River and within the Buckaroo Creek Watershed. Monitoring continued to quantify effects of habitat enhancements in the upper basin. Maximum, minimum and average daily stream temperatures were collected from June through September at 22 sites. Suspended sediment samples were obtained at three gage stations to arrive at daily sediment load estimates. Photographs were taken at 94 existing and two newly established photo points to document habitat recovery. Umatilla Basin Watershed Assessment efforts were continued under a subcontract with Washington State University. This endeavor involves compiling existing information, identifying data gaps, determining habitat-limiting factors and recommending actions to improve anadromous fisheries habitat. This watershed assessment document and working databases will be completed in fiscal year 2002 and made available to assist project personnel with sub-watershed prioritization of habitat needs.

Shaw, R. Todd

2001-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

334

Our River  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

River River Nature Bulletin No. 22 July 7, 1945 Forest Preserve District of Cook County Clayton F. Smith, President Roberts Mann, Superintendent of Conservation OUR RIVER The people of Cook County are missing a bet. They are not using their DesPlaines River. The other day we took a boat trip down that river from Lake County to Lawndale Avenue in Summit. It being a week day, we saw few people other than an occasional fisherman or pairs of strolling boys. Except for a bridge now and then, there were no signs or sounds of civilization. Chicago might have been a thousand miles away. We rested. There was isolation. There was peace. Once in a while a heron flew ahead of us; or a squirrel scampered up a tree; once we saw a family of young muskrats playing around the entrance to their den in the bank; twice we saw and heard a wood duck; again and again big fish plowed ripples surging ahead of us. It was shady and cool and still beneath the arching trees. We thought of the centuries this river had traveled. We were babes nuzzling again at the breast of Mother Nature.

335

Itron (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Itron Itron Address 601 Officers Row Place Vancouver, Washington Zip 98661 Sector Efficiency Product Manufactures/sells advanced meters and data collection systems Website http://www.itron.com/ Coordinates 45.627447°, -122.656794° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.627447,"lon":-122.656794,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

336

Washington, DC~ZO585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

jpfl.3%2' jpfl.3%2' ) .,Departhent of Eikrgj! : Washington, DC~ZO585 .-, , , Lf; I: ~.1,' .Yj4 , The Honorable Louis Barlup 55 ,E. Main Street Waynesboro;,Pennsy,lvania 17268 '~ Dear Mayor Barl,up:' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary has'announced' a new approach to openness,in the Department of Energy-(DOE) and its communications with the public. In support-of this initiative, we are pleased.to forward the enclosed information related to the former Landis Machine Tool Co. site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. This information:is provided for your information< use, and retention. DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identification of sites used by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their

337

Industrial & Systems Engineering University of Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Industrial & Systems Engineering University of Washington Linda Ng Boyle, Ph.D. Associate Professor linda@u.washington.edu #12;Agenda · What is Industrial & Systems Engineering? · Where do Industrial Engineers get jobs? · What classes would you take in ISE? · Where do UW graduates with ISE degrees

Anderson, Richard

338

EIS-0184: South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes the Seattle City Light, a Department of the City of Seattle proposal to construct a hydroelectric project with an installed capacity of 15 MW on the South Fork Tolt River near the town of Carnation located in King County in the State of Washington.

339

Energy Incentive Programs, Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington Energy Incentive Programs, Washington October 29, 2013 - 1:19pm Addthis Updated January 2013 Washington utilities budgeted over $180 million in 2011 to promote increased energy efficiency in the state, excluding the offerings administered by the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance and Bonneville Power Authority (see below). What public-purpose-funded energy efficiency programs are available in my state? Washington has no public-purpose-funded energy efficiency programs. What utility energy efficiency programs are available to me? Seattle City Light offers a variety of energy efficiency programs to commercial and industrial customers through its Energy Smart Services initiative: Free facility energy assessments are available to medium and large commercial customers in order to manage operating costs and identify energy

340

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 15, 2013 July 15, 2013 CX-010738: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2013 Spacer and Insulator Replacement Program; Third and Fourth Quarter Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/15/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2013 CX-010588: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chehalis Substation Tree Clearing CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 1, 2013 CX-010589: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nine Canyon Communication Tower Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 25, 2013 CX-010429: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harbour Pointe Small Generator Integration

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Washington/Transmission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Washington/Transmission < Washington Jump to: navigation, search WashingtonTransmissionHeader.png Roadmap Agency Links Local Regulations State Regulations Summary General Transmission Dashboard Permitting Atlas Compare States Arizona California Colorado Idaho Montana Nevada New Mexico Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Resource Library NEPA Database The electrical grid in Washington is part of the Western Interconnection power grid and the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC). WECC's service territory extends from Canada to Mexico. It includes the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia, the northern portion of Baja California,

342

Focused Review of the River Protection Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 5 2.0 EVALUATION OF THE CORE FUNCTIONS .......................... 9 2.1 Core Function #1 - Define the Scope of Work ................... 9 2.2 Core Function #2 - Analyze the Hazards......................... 11 2.3 Core Function #3 - Develop and Implement Hazard Controls ............................................................... 13 2.4 Core Function #4 - Perform Work Within Controls ....... 16 2.5 Core Function #5 - Provide Feedback and Continuous Improvement ................................................ 19 3.0 ESSENTIAL SYSTEMS REVIEW ........................................... 26 3.1 Engineering Design and Analysis .................................... 27 3.2 Unreviewed Safety Question Process

343

Focused Review of the River Protection Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

storage and interim stabilization activities to remove liquid wastes from single-shell tanks, as well as to reduce such hazards as flammable hydrogen gas buildup. This review did...

344

River Steamboats  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

River Steamboats River Steamboats Nature Bulletin No. 628-A February 12, 1977 Forest Preserve District of Cook County George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Supt. of Conservation RIVER STEAMBOATS The westward migration of the pioneer settlers and the rapid growth of agriculture, commerce and industry in the Middle West is in large part the story of water transportation on our inland waterways. The two main water routes were the chain of Great Lakes on the north and the Ohio River on the south. Sailing vessels carrying hundreds of tons were able to navigate on the Great Lakes almost as freely as on the ocean. Also, on the Ohio and Mississippi rivers heavy loads could be floated downstream from Pittsburgh to New Orleans -- almost 2000 miles. But boats had to be hauled back upstream by manpower -- grueling labor, stretching over weeks or months to move a few tons a few hundred miles. The coming of the steamboat a century and a half ago changed all this.

345

Independent Oversight Inspection, Hanford Site - June 2010 |...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

site operating contractors - CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company, Mission Support Alliance, Washington Closure Hanford, and Washington River Protection Solutions, and the site...

346

CX-009695: Categorical Exclusion Determination  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Small-Scale Mercury Spill Cleanup CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

347

Audit Report: OAS-M-15-01 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

M-15-01 Audit Report: OAS-M-15-01 January 12, 2015 Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington River Protection Solutions Washington River Protection Solutions...

348

Washington Update January 26, 2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, and especially clean energy technology -- an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet percent of America's electricity to come from clean energy sources by 2035. He made clear that he to Congress that helps us meet that goal. We'll invest in biomedical research, information technology

349

Protection Programming Defensive Planning for Fixed Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE STD-1207-2012 December 2012 DOE STANDARD Protection Program Defensive Planning For Fixed Facilities U.S. Department of Energy AREA SANS Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE STD-1207-2012 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ii DOE STD-1207-2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD..................................................................................................................................v PROTECTION PROGRAM DEFENSIVE PLANNING ..........................................................1 1. SCOPE............................................................................................................................ 1 2. PURPOSE. ..................................................................................................................... 1

350

Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America Cities, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America...

351

Washington Success Story-A Performance Contracting Program |...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Success Story-A Performance Contracting Program Washington Success Story-A Performance Contracting Program Provides an overview case study of Washington's Performance Contracting...

352

DOE Cites Washington Closure Hanford for Safety Violations |...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

contractor Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) for violations of DOE's worker safety and health program regulations in 2009 at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. In a...

353

Washington: RePower's Energy Dashboard Spurs Change on Bainbridge...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

in which we work, shop, and lead our everyday lives. Addthis Related Articles Washington: Sustainability Training for Realtors in High Demand Washington: Community Power Works is...

354

WSDE Report: Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington State...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington State Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Report: WSDE Report: Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington...

355

Washington's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7th congressional district: Energy Resources 7th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 7th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 7th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 7th congressional district ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center

356

Washington's 6th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington's 6th congressional district Clean Tech Trade Alliance Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 6th congressional district Inventure Chemical Technology Structural...

357

Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"TERRAIN","zoom":6,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"500px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7510741,"lon":-120.7401386,"alt":0,"address":"Washington

358

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Group International - Group International - EA-2003-07 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International - EA-2003-07 October 23, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington Group International related to Falsification of Records and Procurement Deficiencies at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the investigation conducted by the Department of Energy (DOE) into allegations that RTS Wright Industries, LLC, (RTS), a supplier for which Washington Group International (WGI) had direct contractual responsibility, had falsified quality control inspection records. These records pertained to the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Supercompactor Glovebox Suite at the Idaho

359

Kootenai Electric Cooperative (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Cooperative (Washington) Cooperative (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Kootenai Electric Cooperative Place Washington Utility Id 10454 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates No Rates Available The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for Kootenai Electric Cooperative (Washington). Month RES REV (THOUSAND $) RES SALES (MWH) RES CONS COM REV (THOUSAND $) COM SALES (MWH) COM CONS IND_REV (THOUSAND $) IND SALES (MWH) IND CONS OTH REV (THOUSAND $) OTH SALES (MWH) OTH CONS TOT REV (THOUSAND $) TOT SALES (MWH) TOT CONS

360

Good Energies (Washington DC) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Energies (Washington DC) Energies (Washington DC) Name Good Energies (Washington DC) Address 1250 24th St., NW, Suite 250 Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20037 Product Global investor in renewable energy and energy efficiency industries Year founded 2001 Phone number (202) 747-2550 Website http://www.goodenergies.com/ Coordinates 38.90649°, -77.051534° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.90649,"lon":-77.051534,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 7, 2013 January 7, 2013 CX-009785: Categorical Exclusion Determination Roosevelt Radio Station Emergency Generator Removal and Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 3, 2013 CX-010563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest National Laboratory- Non-Wire Methods for Transmission Congestion Management Through Predictive Simulation and Optimization CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/03/2013 Location(s): Washington, North Carolina, Illinois, Oregon Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy December 27, 2012 CX-009699: Categorical Exclusion Determination Continuation of Yakama Nation Sturgeon Management Project CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 12/27/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington

362

Northern Lights, Inc (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lights, Inc (Washington) Lights, Inc (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Northern Lights, Inc Place Washington Utility Id 13758 References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File2_2010[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0982/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File2_2010" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Lights,_Inc_(Washington)&oldid=412730" Categories: EIA Utility Companies and Aliases Utility Companies Organizations Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version

363

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 4, 2011 April 4, 2011 CX-005572: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Washington-Tribe-Cowlitz Indian Tribe CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/04/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 30, 2011 CX-005577: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation for the Purchase of the Ninemile Creek Property Date: 03/30/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 27, 2011 CX-005474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Charging Stations - Willis D. Tucker Park CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/14/2011 Location(s): Snohomish, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

364

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 7, 2011 July 7, 2011 CX-006111: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-Tribe-Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 7, 2011 CX-006262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Walla Walla County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2011 CX-008688: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of equipment at Wahkiakum Public Utility District's Cathlamet Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/02/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2011 CX-008011: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install EMSL Super-Computer Power Infrastructure

365

Map Locating Berkeley Lab Washington, DC Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE Map LEGEND: A:Berkeley Lab DC Office; PNNL; NREL; ORNL | B: EPA Waterside Mall C: Metrorail Station: Smithsonian | D: Metrorail Station: L'Enfant Plaza Notice: Due to security requirements in the building, all visitors to the Berkeley Lab DC Projects Office must check in at the ground floor entrance. If you do not have a DOE access badge, you will need to obtain a building visitor badge. To expedite this process, visitors are encouraged to RSVP to their meeting host or call (202) 488-2250 ahead of time. Metal detectors and x-ray screening of personal items are required for all visitors and staff entering the building. Directions to the Lab's Washington, DC Projects Office 901 D Street, SW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20024 Phone/Fax: (202) 488-2250

366

2013 Washington Auto Show | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2013 Washington Auto Show 2013 Washington Auto Show 2013 Washington Auto Show Addthis 1 of 10 While at the Washington Auto Show, Energy Secretary Steven Chu visited Nissan to see the 2013 Leaf. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:50 2 of 10 The new Nissan Leaf is being built at the company's Smyrna, Tennessee, Vehicle Assembly Plant -- helping to cut the price of its electric vehicle. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:49 3 of 10 Energy Secretary Steven Chu discusses the features of the 2014 Cadillac ELR -- the luxury car built built on the same powertrain platform as the Chevy Volt. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:57 4 of 10 Energy Secretary Steven Chu discusses some of the features of the Chevy

367

Robert Wood, University of Washington many contributors  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Robert Wood, University of Washington many contributors VOCALS Education and Outreach Snider (Wyoming) · Dave Spencer (NCSU) · Cindy Twohy (OSU) · Rob Wood/Chris Bretherton/Rhea George

Wood, Robert

368

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ANNUAL EQUIPMENT TESTING AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ANNUAL EQUIPMENT TESTING AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY DIVING SAFETY PROGRAM Date Tested Condition when received Intermediate Pressure Inhalation Resistance Exhalation Resistance Tested Make Serial Number Date Tested Results DEPTH GAUGE BUOYANCY COMPENSATOR Make Serial Number Date

Wilcock, William

369

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Closure Hanford,...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Issued to Washington Closure Hanford, LLC related an Employee Fall at the High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) at the Hanford Site On August 19, 2010, the U.S. Department...

370

University of Washington Montlake Landfill Oversight Committee  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

University of Washington Montlake Landfill Oversight Committee Montlake Landfill Project Guide Department with the review and approval of the Montlake Landfill Oversight Committee. #12;Montlake Landfill ...................................................................................................................................3 Figure 1 ­ Approximate Boundaries of the Montlake Landfill

Wilcock, William

371

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 26, 2010 July 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 26, 2010 CX-003170: Categorical Exclusion Determination Innovative Phase Change Thermal Energy Storage Solution for Baseload Power CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination

372

Washington/Wind Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington/Wind Resources Washington/Wind Resources < Washington Jump to: navigation, search Print PDF Print Full Version WIND ENERGY STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT & OUTREACHSmall Wind Guidebook Home OpenEI Home >> Wind >> Small Wind Guidebook >> Washington Wind Resources WindTurbine-icon.png Small Wind Guidebook * Introduction * First, How Can I Make My Home More Energy Efficient? * Is Wind Energy Practical for Me? * What Size Wind Turbine Do I Need? * What Are the Basic Parts of a Small Wind Electric System? * What Do Wind Systems Cost? * Where Can I Find Installation and Maintenance Support? * How Much Energy Will My System Generate? * Is There Enough Wind on My Site? * How Do I Choose the Best Site for My Wind Turbine? * Can I Connect My System to the Utility Grid?

373

PacifiCorp (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Washington Service Territory Washington Website www.pacificorp.com/index. Green Button Reference Page www.pacificpower.net/abou Green Button Implemented Yes Utility Id 14354 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. PacifiCorp consists of three business units. Pacific Power is a subsidiary of PacifiCorp which delivers electricity to customers in Oregon, Washington and California; it is headquartered in Portland, OR. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0723/kWh Commercial: $0.0688/kWh Industrial: $0.0571/kWh The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for PacifiCorp

374

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 5, 2013 April 5, 2013 CX-010154: Categorical Exclusion Determination Digital Communication System Upgrade Project: 'D' Analog System Retirement and #WC SONET Ring CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/05/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010094: Categorical Exclusion Determination Activity-Specific Categorical Exclusion for Deep Borehole Drilling, Sampling, and Characterization for the Proposed Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco, Washington to the Hanford Site 200 East Area CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington

375

Recovery Act State Memos Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington, DC Washington, DC For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION TABLE.............................................................................. 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................... 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY ............................................................................................. 5

376

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update on May 22, 2013.

377

Energy Matters in Washington State Page 1 Energy Matters  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energy Matters in Washington State ­ Page 1 Energy Matters in Washington State June 2008 Updated November 2009 Updated and Revised October 2013 Grand Coulee Dam #12;Energy Matters in Washington State ­ Page 2 Copyright © 2013 Washington State University Energy Program. 905 Plum Street SE, P.O. Box 43169

Collins, Gary S.

378

Washington Success StoryA Performance Contracting Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Provides an overview case study of Washington's Performance Contracting Program. Author: Energy Services Coalition

379

Relaxing the perimeter and high-density rules: implications for Washington Dulles International Airport  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Perimeter and High-Density Rules have been the foundation upon which the physically limited capacity of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport has been allocated. The perimeter rule at National Airport requires nonstop scheduled airline flights from that airport to serve destinations within a 1250-mile perimeter. The distance limit was initially introduced for a combination of reasons including environmental conservation (especially with respect to noise nuisance) and the desire to offer some protection for other airports in the Washington DC area as they built up traffic to reach a critical mass. The US Senate has recently taken actions to adjust the perimeter rule at National Airport. Any major relaxing of the rule will have implications for the other major airports in the National Capital Region; namely Washington Dulles International Airport and BaltimoreWashington International Airport. The resultant knock-on effects of this development on the wider economy of the region is examined here. The main attention of the paper is on the impact of any major change in the perimeter rule on Washington Dulles International Airport, and on the subsequent knock-on effects this would have on the region's employment level and structure.

Kenneth Button; Peter Arena; Roger Stough

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Hydroelectric power provides a cheap source of electricity with few carbon emissions. Yet, reservoirs are not operated sustainably, which we define as meeting societal needs for water and power while protecting long-term health of the river ecosystem. Reservoirs that generate hydropower are typically operated with the goal of maximizing energy reve  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hydroelectric power provides a cheap source of electricity with few carbon emissions. Yet, reservoirs are not operated sustainably, which we define as meeting societal needs for water and power while protecting long-term health of the river ecosystem. Reservoirs that generate hydropower are typically operated with the goal of maximizing energy revenue, while meeting other legal water requirements. Reservoir optimization schemes used in practice do not seek flow regimes that maximize aquatic ecosystem health. Here, we review optimization studies that considered environmental goals in one of three approaches. The first approach seeks flow regimes that maximize hydropower generation, while satisfying legal requirements, including environmental (or minimum) flows. Solutions from this approach are often used in practice to operate hydropower projects. In the second approach, flow releases from a dam are timed to meet water quality constraints on dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature and nutrients. In the third approach, flow releases are timed to improve the health of fish populations. We conclude by suggesting three steps for bringing multi-objective reservoir operation closer to the goal of ecological sustainability: (1) conduct research to identify which features of flow variation are essential for river health and to quantify these relationships, (2) develop valuation methods to assess the total value of river health and (3) develop optimal control softwares that combine water balance modelling with models that predict ecosystem responses to flow.

Jager, Yetta [ORNL; Smith, Brennan T [ORNL

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

December 5, 2012, Deparment letter transmitting the Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2012-1, Savannah River Site Building 235-F Safety.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585 December 5, 2012 The Honorable Peter S. Winokur Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20004 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is the Department of Energy's (DOE) Implementation Plan (IP) for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's (Board) Recommendation 2012-1, Savannah River Site Building 235-F Sq(et identifing the Depatiment's actions to reduce the hazards

382

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Washington Points of Washington Points of Contact to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Points of Contact The following people or agencies can help you find more information about Washington's clean transportation laws, incentives, and funding

383

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Washington Laws and Washington Laws and Incentives to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives Listed below are incentives, laws, and regulations related to alternative fuels and advanced vehicles for Washington. Your Clean Cities coordinator

384

warhead protection  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

1%2A en Office of Nuclear Warhead Protection http:nnsa.energy.govaboutusourprogramsnonproliferationprogramofficesinternationalmaterialprotectionandcooperation-0

385

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Savannah River Site Waste Solidification Building Corrective Actions from the January 2013 Report on Construction Quality of Mechanical Systems Installation and Fire Protection Design [HIAR SRS-2013-5-07

386

Net Benefits to Agriculture from the Trinity River Project, Texas  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The purpose of this study was to estimate the agricultural benefits due to flood protection provided by the proposed Trinity River Project. The area examined was the land located between the 100-year flood plain with the project and without...

Fish, B.; Williford, G.; Elling, H.; Lacewell, R. D.; Hosch, P.; Griffin, W.; Reddell, D. L.; Hiler, E. A.; Bausch, W.

387

A I K E N  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SC (April 25, 2014) -- Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) has asked Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to establish and oversee a panel of external experts to...

388

Quantitative 3-D Elemental Mapping by LA-ICP-MS of a Basaltic Clast from the Hanford 300 Area, Washington, USA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Quantitative 3-D Elemental Mapping by LA-ICP-MS of a Basaltic Clast from the Hanford 300 Area collected from the Hanford 300 Area in south-central Washington State, United States. A calibration method and riparian quality in many locations, most notably at the Hanford, Savannah River, Oak Ridge, and Nevada Test

Hu, Qinhong "Max"

389

Use of Noncompetitive Procurements to Obtain Services at the Savannah River Site, IG-0862  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Use of Noncompetitive Use of Noncompetitive Procurements to Obtain Services at the Savannah River Site DOE/IG-0862 April 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 10, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Use of Noncompetitive Procurements to Obtain Services at the Savannah River Site" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC (SRNS), assumed management and operating responsibility for the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site located near Aiken, South Carolina, in August 2008. Under its contract, SRNS is responsible for environmental cleanup,

390

Sandia National Laboratories: University of Washington  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

is a partnered effort to develop marine hydrokinetic (MHK) reference models (RMs) for wave energy converters and tidal, ocean, and river current energy converters. The RMP team...

391

Savannah River Remediation, College Create Job Opportunities for Graduates  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

AIKEN, S.C. Savannah River Remediation (SRR), the liquid waste contractor for the EM program at the Savannah River Site (SRS), requires workers with unique skills to protect employees from radiation as the company works safely toward completing its mission.

392

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF THE INTERACTION OF GROUNDWATER WITH THE COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE 100-D AREA  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Groundwater beneath much of Hanford's 100 Areas is contaminated with hexavalent chromium (Cr{sup +6}) as a consequence of treating reactor cooling water to prevent corrosion. Several treatment systems are in place to remove Cr{sup +6} from the groundwater; however, these systems currently do not reduce Cr{sup +6} to concentrations below aquatic standards. Of concern is the transport of Cr{sup +6} to areas within the channel of the river, as sensitive species inhabit the river and its associated transition zone. The aquatic standard for Cr{sup +6} is currently 11 ug/l under the Record of Decision (ROD) for Interim Action and Department of Energy (DOE) currently plans to pursue remediation of the groundwater to achieve the 11 ug/l standard. Because the compliance wells used to monitor the current remediation systems are located some distance from the river, they may not provide an accurate indication of Cr{sup +6} concentrations in the water that reaches the riverbed. In addition, because salmon spawning areas are considered a high priority for protection from Hanford contaminants, it would be advantageous to understand (1) to what extent Cr{sup +6} discharged to the near-shore or river ecosystems is diluted or attenuated and (2) mechanisms that could mitigate the exposure of the river ecosystems to the discharging Cr{sup +6}. The current concentration target for Cr{sup +6} at near-river groundwater monitoring locations is 20 {micro}g/L; it is assumed that this groundwater mixes with river water that contains virtually no chromium to meet Washington Department of Ecology's (Ecology) water quality standard of 10 {micro}g/L in the river environment. This dynamic mixing process is believed to be driven by daily and seasonal changes in river stage and groundwater remediation system operations, and has been validated using analytical data from numerous groundwater samples obtained adjacent to and within the banks of the river. Although the mean mixing factor of river water and site groundwater in this zone has been estimated to be equal parts of groundwater and river water, a wide range of mixing ratios likely occurs at various times of the day and year. The degree of mixing and dilution appears to be greatly influenced by the river stage and other groundwater/surface water interaction. The extent of mixing, thus, has implications for the design and operation of the groundwater remediation systems. Improved understanding of this 'dilution' mechanism is needed to design an optimum 'systems approach' to accelerate remediation of the near-shore contaminant plumes. More information on the pathway from near-river mapped plumes to riverbed receptor locations is also needed to develop a defensible proposed plan for a future ROD for final remedial action of contaminated groundwater. In April 2008, an expert panel of scientists was convened to review existing information and provide observations and suggestions to improve the current understanding of groundwater surface water interactions in the 100 Areas (primarily focusing on 100-D Area), and to identify what additional analyses or approaches may provide critical information needed to design and implement remediation systems that will minimize impacts to river aquatic systems. Specific objectives provided to the panel included: (1) comment on approaches and methods to improve the current understanding of groundwater-surface water interactions, specifically how contaminated groundwater enters the riverbed and how this relates to remediation of chromate in the groundwater in the 100 Areas; (2) evaluate past and current data collection methods, data analysis techniques, assumptions, and groundwater transport and mixing mechanisms; (3) evaluate the current monitoring network (monitoring wells, aquifer tubes, and shoreline/river monitoring); (4) evaluate the role played by modeling; and (5) suggest additional research to fill data gaps and perform modeling.

PETERSEN SW

2008-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

393

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site December 8, 2008 - 4:58pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award to Savannah River Remediation, LLC as the liquid waste contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $3.3 billion over the entire contract, consisting of a base period of six years, plus an option to extend for up to two additional years. The base performance period of the contract will be from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2015. A 90-day transition period will begin January 2, 2009.

394

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

395

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

396

Mirant Potomac River: DOE Case OE-05-01 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

River: DOE Case OE-05-01 River: DOE Case OE-05-01 Mirant Potomac River: DOE Case OE-05-01 Written presentation of information regarding the Potomac River power plant that Mirant shared with DOE, PEPCO and PJM at a meeting called by DOE on September 1, 2005. Mirant Potomac River: DOE Case OE-05-01 More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan Notice of Emergency Action - Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA, in Response to Electricity Reliability Concerns in Washington, DC: Federal Register Notice Volume 71, No. 13 - Jan. 20, 2006 Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken under U.S. Department of

397

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site December 8, 2008 - 4:58pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award to Savannah River Remediation, LLC as the liquid waste contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $3.3 billion over the entire contract, consisting of a base period of six years, plus an option to extend for up to two additional years. The base performance period of the contract will be from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2015. A 90-day transition period will begin January 2, 2009.

398

Red River Compact (Texas)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Red River Compact Commission administers the Red River Compact to ensure that Texas receives its equitable share of quality water from the Red River and its tributaries as apportioned by the...

399

DOE/EIS-0312 Record of Decision for the Washington-Action Agency Estuary Habitat MOA (09/15/09)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION WASHINGTON-ACTION AGENCY ESTUARY HABITAT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT September 2009 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1 2.1 What is the Columbia River Estuary?............................................................... 1 2.2 Importance of the Estuary for All Listed Stocks ............................................. 2 2.3 Estuary Habitat and the 2008 FCRPS BiOp ..................................................... 2 2.4 The March 6, 2009, hearing before Judge Redden.

400

Washington State Department of Ecology | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington State Department of Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology Jump to: navigation, search Name Washington State Department of Ecology Place Lacey, Washington State Zip 98503 References Washington State Department of Ecology[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Washington State Department of Ecology is an organization located in Lacey, Washington State . References ↑ "Washington State Department of Ecology" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Washington_State_Department_of_Ecology&oldid=696505" Categories: Government Agencies Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district 3 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 2nd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district Mercurius Biofuels LLC

402

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 22, 2012 June 22, 2012 CX-008692: Categorical Exclusion Determination Amendment Number 2 to the Alcoa Power Sales Agreement CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 06/22/2012 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 21, 2012 CX-008695: Categorical Exclusion Determination Munro Control Center Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008694: Categorical Exclusion Determination Acquisition and Disposition of Property CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Washington, Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008693: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Structure Replacements on the Chehalis-Centralia No. 2 115 Kilovolt Transmission Line

403

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 14, 2011 June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 06/14/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 10, 2011 CX-006198: Categorical Exclusion Determination South Tacoma - Frederickson Power Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 06/10/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2011 CX-006197: Categorical Exclusion Determination Omak Area 3G Radio Site Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2011 Location(s): Okanogan, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 8, 2011 CX-006049: Categorical Exclusion Determination

404

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

405

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 25, 2010 August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Badger Canyon Substation Radio Communication Tower Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 24, 2010 CX-003613: Categorical Exclusion Determination

406

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 12, 2011 December 12, 2011 CX-008010: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small-Scale Research and Development Projects Using Nanoscale Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 12/12/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office December 9, 2011 CX-007481: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007479: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project

407

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 12, 2011 August 12, 2011 CX-006472: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006468: Categorical Exclusion Determination Testing Subcontractor for Fenestration System Energy Performance Rating Development and Research CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Everett, Washington

408

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 3, 2011 March 3, 2011 CX-005410: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Alcoa Number 1 and 2 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 3, 2011 CX-005409: Categorical Exclusion Determination Olympia-Grand Coulee Number 1 Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 2, 2011 CX-005379: Categorical Exclusion Determination Insulator Replacement in Agricultural Lands Along the Grand Coulee-Bell Number 3/Grand Coulee-Westside No. 1 Double Circuit 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/02/2011 Location(s): Lincoln County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

409

Arch Venture Partners (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arch Venture Partners (Washington) Arch Venture Partners (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Arch Venture Partners Address 1000 Second Avenue Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98104 Region Pacific Northwest Area Product Venture capital firm investing in alternative energy production Website http://www.archventure.com/ Coordinates 47.6051741°, -122.3351302° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6051741,"lon":-122.3351302,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

410

ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington) Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: ARCH Venture Partners Name ARCH Venture Partners Address 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3700 Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98104 Region Pacific Northwest Area Coordinates 47.605526°, -122.334716° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.605526,"lon":-122.334716,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

411

The George Washington University | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

The George Washington University The George Washington University Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20052 Coordinates 38.8991756°, -77.0470916° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.8991756,"lon":-77.0470916,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

412

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 5, 2010 October 5, 2010 CX-004255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Spacer Dampers Along the Chief Joseph PH-Chief Joseph Number 6 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/05/2010 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 4, 2010 CX-004076: Categorical Exclusion Determination East Omak Substation Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 10/04/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 30, 2010 CX-004116: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

413

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000348: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington

414

Platte River Cooperative Agreement  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Platte River Cooperative Agreement Skip Navigation Links Transmission Functions Infrastructure projects Interconnection OASIS OATT Platte River Cooperative Agreement PEIS, NE, WY,...

415

River Basin Commissions (Indiana)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This legislation establishes river basin commissions, for the Kankakee, Maumee, St. Joseph, and Upper Wabash Rivers. The commissions facilitate and foster cooperative planning and coordinated...

416

EIS-0384: Chief Joseph Hatchery Program, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes DOE's approach and associated impacts of a comprehensive management program for summer/fall Chinook salmon in the Okanogan subbasin and the Columbia River between the confluence of the Okanogan River and Chief Joseph Dam including construction, operation, and maintenance of a hatchery and acclimation ponds.

417

The Washington State Experience Energy Code Compliance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington State Experience Washington State Experience Residential Energy Code Compliance Gary Nordeen Senior Building Science Specialist April 4, 2013 WSU Energy Program Provides energy services, products, education and information for: * Businesses * Utilities ̶ public and private * Governments ̶ state and local * Tribes * Federal agencies * Manufacturing plants * Educational facilities * National laboratories WSU Energy Program Building Science Team * Residential energy code technical assistance * Voluntary programs, Northwest ENERGYSTAR Homes * Research and development, Building America * Community-based upgrade programs * Industry training and certifications ̶ HERS, BPI, ENERGY STAR, PTCS Staff provides building science expertise for: WSU Energy Program

418

Red Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Richland, Washington U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Lion Hotel Richland Hanford House Richland, Washington U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange April 13 - 14, 2010 Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange 1 Welcome Dear Participant, On behalf of the Department of Energy and the Savannah River National Laboratory, we welcome you to the Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange. Each of you bring a wealth of experience from a variety of different perspectives that will be essential for the effective and compliant imple- mentation of performance and risk assessments in support of tank closure, site operations, and area completion projects. The Performance Assess-

419

Microsoft Word - SavannahRiverAward20030701.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2003 , 2003 Energy Department Awards $295,000 Grant to Savannah River Regional Diversification Initiative WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that it will award $295,000 to the Savannah River Regional Diversification Initiative (SRRDI), to establish a positive economic development environment that includes job creation, job retention, and entrepreneurial development in high-tech and manufacturing businesses. SRRDI is the community reuse organization (CRO) for the department's Savannah River Site. "The Energy Department is a good neighbor to the communities surrounding our sites," Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham said. "We will continue to work with the Savannah River Regional Diversification Initiative and other community reuse organizations around the country,

420

Microsoft Word - GrantSavannahRiver20020828.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

200,000 Grant to the Savannah River 200,000 Grant to the Savannah River Regional Diversification Initiative Community Reuse Organization WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Department of Energy has awarded $200,000 in the form of a competitive grant to the Savannah River Regional Diversification Initiative (SRRDI). SRRDI is the community reuse organization (CRO) for the Department's Savannah River Site. The SRRDI applied for funding from the Department's Office of Worker and Community Transition in the form of a competitive grant. Each CRO can apply for funds under the Small Capital Program (small cap) up to $200,000 and/or the Large Capital Program (large cap) up to one million dollars. "The Energy Department is a good neighbor to the communities surrounding our sites," Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham said. "We will continue to work with SRDDI and other

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site January 18, 2006 - 10:49am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued the waste determination for the treatment and stabilization of low activity salt-waste at the Savannah River Site allowing for significant reductions in environmental and health risks posed by the material. Stored in forty-nine underground tanks, approximately 36 million gallons of radioactive waste is left over from plutonium production during the Cold War. In addition, the department issued an amended Record of Decision and Implementation Plan to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. "Today's announcement clears the way for the removal and treatment of this

422

Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual ?ow, generates more power than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the Columbia River Basin is actually located in Canada. Yet the Canadian waters account for about 38 percent of the average annual volume, and up to 50 percent of the peak ?ood waters, that ?ow by The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, of?cials from the United States and Canada began a long process to seek a joint solution to the ?ooding caused by the unregulated Columbia River and to the postwar demand for greater energy resources. That effort culminated in the Columbia River Treaty, an international agreement between Canada and the United States for the cooperative development of water resources regulation in the upper Columbia River Basin. It was signed in 1961 and implemented in 1964.

None

2009-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security Protection Officer Competition Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security Protection Officer Competition April 26, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor, (803) 952-8564, bill.taylor@srs.gov Savannah River Site, Aiken, S.C. - Security Protection Officers from Savannah River Site's (SRS) security contractor WSI-SRS, today won the Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary's Trophy as the top DOE team in the 2012 Security Protection Officer Team Competition (SPOTC)- 2012 Carolina Challenge, held here, April 22-26. It was the 40th anniversary of the SPOTC competition. In 2012 Carolina Challenge, SRS was among 11 teams representing DOE sites. The threeman team competition was won by Security Protection Officers

424

Alliance for Climate Protection | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Climate Protection Climate Protection (Redirected from The Alliance for Climate Protection) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: The Alliance for Climate Protection Name The Alliance for Climate Protection Address 901 E Street NW, Suite 610 Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20004 Year founded 2006 Website http://www.climateprotect.org/ Coordinates 38.896398°, -77.024192° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.896398,"lon":-77.024192,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

425

Risk and Performance Analyses Supporting Closure of WMA C at the Hanford Site in Southeast Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of River Protection under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is pursuing closure of the Single-Shell Tank (SST) Waste Management Area (WMA) C as stipulated by the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (HFFACO) under federal requirements and work tasks will be done under the State-approved closure plans and permits. An initial step in meeting the regulatory requirements is to develop a baseline risk assessment representing current conditions based on available characterization data and information collected at the WMA C location. The baseline risk assessment will be supporting a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) Field Investigation (RFI)/Corrective Measures Study (CMS) for WMA closure and RCRA corrective action. Complying with the HFFACO conditions also involves developing a long-term closure Performance Assessment (PA) that evaluates human health and environmental impacts resulting from radionuclide inventories in residual wastes remaining in WMA C tanks and ancillary equipment. This PA is being developed to meet the requirements necessary for closure authorization under DOE Order 435.1 and Washington State Hazardous Waste Management Act. To meet the HFFACO conditions, the long-term closure risk analysis will include an evaluation of human health and environmental impacts from hazardous chemical inventories along with other performance Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Appropriate and Applicable Requirements (CERCLA ARARs) in residual wastes left in WMA C facilities after retrieval and removal. This closure risk analysis is needed to needed to comply with the requirements for permitted closure. Progress to date in developing a baseline risk assessment of WMA C has involved aspects of an evaluation of soil characterization and groundwater monitoring data collected as a part of the RFI/CMS and RCRA monitoring. Developing the long-term performance assessment aspects has involved the construction of detailed numerical models of WMA C using the Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases (STOMP) computer code, the development of a technical approach for abstraction of a range of representative STOMP simulations into a system-level model based on the GoldSim system-level model software.The STOMP-based models will be used to evaluate local-scale impacts and closed facility performance over a sufficient range of simulations to allow for development of the system-level model of the WMA C. The GoldSim-based system-level model will be used to evaluate overall sensitivity of modeled parameters and the estimate the uncertainty in potential future impacts from a closed WMA C facility.

Eberlein, Susan J. [Washington River Protection Systems, Richland, WA (United States); Bergeron, Marcel P. [Washington River Protection Systems, Richland, WA (United States); Kemp, Christopher J. [USDOE Office of River Protection, Richland, WA (United States); Hildebrand, R. Douglas [USDOE Office of River Protection, Richland, WA (United States); Aly, Alaa [INTERA, Inc., Richland, WA (United States); Kozak, Matthew [INTERA, Inc., Richland, WA (United States); Mehta, Sunil [INTERA, Inc., Richland, WA (United States); Connelly, Michael [Freestone Environmental Services, Richland, WA (United States)

2013-11-11T23:59:59.000Z

426

Microsoft Word - CX_Okanogan_River.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2012 4, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Dave Roberts Project Manager - KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Provision of funds to the Colville Confederated Tribes for the purchase of two parcels of land along the Okanogan River. Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2007-224-00 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25 Transfer of land/habitat preservation, wildlife management. Location: The Okanogan River properties are located south of the town of Omak, in Okanogan County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Colville Confederated Tribes (CCT). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund the acquisition of two properties

427

Twin Rivers Technologies | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Rivers Technologies Rivers Technologies Address 780 Washington Street Place Quincy, Massachusetts Zip 02169 Sector Biofuels Product Developing vegetable oil based biofuels Website http://www.twinriverstechnolog Coordinates 42.2452749°, -70.9698774° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.2452749,"lon":-70.9698774,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

428

FEDERAL ENERGY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT judge, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today ordered an expedited fact-finding hearing of the discussions. #12;Chairman Curt L. Hébert, Jr. stated as follows: "At some point, regulatory and R-01-33 (more

Laughlin, Robert B.

429

George Washington University The Department of Philosophy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

George Washington University The Department of Philosophy Announces The Thacher-Reynolds Memorial Fellowship The Department of Philosophy invites applications for the Thacher-Reynolds Memorial Fellowship for a philosophy major in the senior year who has strong interests in graduate or professional studies. At the end

Vertes, Akos

430

WWU Sustainability Academy Western Washington University  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

WWU Sustainability Academy Western Washington University Dear colleagues, We cordially extend to you this invitation to join the WWU Sustainability Academy! Following several years of discussion, a group of faculty has started the (tentatively named) "WWU Sustainability Academy." Our goal is to build

Zaferatos, Nicholas C.

431

Washington Clean Technology Alliance | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alliance Alliance Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington Clean Technology Alliance Name Washington Clean Technology Alliance Address 1301 Fifth Avenue Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98101 Region Pacific Northwest Area Year founded 2007 Phone number 206 310 1642 Website http://www.wacleantech.org/ Notes Business alliance for clean tech sectors in Washington state Coordinates 47.608714°, -122.3338038° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.608714,"lon":-122.3338038,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

432

EVALUATING TRADEOFFS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTIONS AND AGRICULTURAL WATER SECURITY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EVALUATING TRADEOFFS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTIONS AND AGRICULTURAL WATER SECURITY T. E Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA ABSTRACT River basin managers responsible for water allocation decisions are increasingly required

Merenlender, Adina

433

Project #31: Connecticut River  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

GEOMORPHIC SETTING: At the project location, the Connecticut River has an annual average discharge of...

Wendi Goldsmith; Donald Gray; John McCullah

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Field Office Tritium  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Field Office Tritium Field Office Tritium Facilities - November 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Field Office Tritium Facilities - November 2013 November 13, 2013 Review of Savannah River Field Office Tritium Facilities Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the radiological protection program at the Savannah River Site (SRS) tritium facilities implemented at the activity-level by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC and its subcontractors. The review was performed by the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations within the broader context of an ongoing program of targeted assessments of radiological control programs, with an emphasis on

435

Fire Protection  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Standard was developed to provide acceptable methods and approaches for meeting DOE fire protection program and design requirements and to address special or unique fire protection issues at DOE facilities that are not comprehensively or adequately addressed in national consensus standards or other design criteria.

2012-12-05T23:59:59.000Z

436

Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act (Ontario, Canada) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act (Ontario, Canada) Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act (Ontario, Canada) Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act (Ontario, Canada) < Back Eligibility Construction Developer Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Utility Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info State Ontario Program Type Environmental Regulations Safety and Operational Guidelines Siting and Permitting Provider Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources The Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act proscribes the management, protection, preservation and use of the waters of the lakes and rivers of Ontario and the land under them. The Act also details regulations for the protection of persons and property by ensuring that dams are suitably located, constructed, operated and maintained and are of an appropriate nature. The

437

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Grants to someone by E-mail Grants to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

438

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

439

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

440

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Rebates to someone by E-mail Rebates to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

442

Washington's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional

443

Price of Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Price of Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4...

444

Leasing State Trust Lands in Washington | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Trust Lands in Washington Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Leasing State Trust Lands in WashingtonLegal Abstract The...

445

An Introduction to Washington Water Law | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

An Introduction to Washington Water Law Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: An Introduction to Washington Water LawLegal...

446

DOE, Washington Closure complete recycling project at Hanford  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently teamed with contractor Washington Closure Hanford to complete a major recycling effort during cleanup of the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State.

447

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

448

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Biodiesel to someone by E-mail Biodiesel to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

449

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

EVs to someone by E-mail EVs to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

450

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

to someone by E-mail to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives Listed below are the summaries of all current Washington laws, incentives, regulations, funding opportunities, and other initiatives related to

451

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Ethanol to someone by E-mail Ethanol to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

452

EIS-0205: Joint NEPA/SEPA Final Environmental Impact Statement Washington Windplant No. 1, Goldendale, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energys Bonneville Power Administration prepared this statement in order to fulfill its National Environmental Policy Act obligations ahead of signing an agreement with the utilities that would purchase the Windplants power from KENETECH. KENETECH Windpower, Inc., proposes to construct and operate Washington Windplant No. 1 in the Columbia Hills area, southeast of Goldendale, in Klickitat County, Washington.

453

Preliminary geology of eastern Umtanum Ridge, South-Central Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The basalt stratigraphy and geologic structures of eastern Umtanum Ridge have been mapped and studied in detail to help assess the feasibility of nuclear waste terminal storage on the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. Eastern Umtanum Ridge is an asymmetric east-west-trending anticline of Columbia River basalt that plunges 5 degrees eastward into the Pasco Basin. Geologic mapping and determination of natural remanent magnetic polarity and chemical composition reveal that flows of the Pomona and Umatilla Members (Saddle Mountains Basalt), Priest Rapids and Frenchman Springs Members (Wanapum Basalt), and Grande Ronde Basalt were erupted as fairly uniform sheets. The Wahluke and Huntzinger flows (Saddle Mountains Basalt) fill a paleovalley cut into Wanapum Basalt. No evidence was found to indicate Quaternary-age movement on any structures in the map area. The basalt strata on the south limb of the Umtanum anticline display relatively little tectonic deformation since Miocene-Pliocene time. Thus, the buried south flank of Umtanum Ridge may provide an excellent location for a nuclear waste repository beneath the Hanford Site.

Goff, F.E.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

FUPWG Spring 2011 Washington, D.C., Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Washington update, and is given during the FUPWG Spring 2011 meeting.

455

Microsoft Word - FINAL_HSEP_Oct08_summar.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

included overseeing Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) functional areas such as conduct of operations, radiation protection, industrial hygiene, occupational safety, as...

456

Savannah River Hydrogen Storage Technology  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation from the Hydrogen Storage Pre-Solicitation Meeting held June 19, 2003 in Washington, DC.

457

Audit Report: OAS-M-15-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Audit Report: OAS-M-15-01 Audit Report: OAS-M-15-01 January 12, 2015 Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington River Protection Solutions Washington River...

458

1979-1980 Geothermal Resource Assessment Program in Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Separate abstracts were prepared for seven papers. Also included are a bibliography of geothermal resource information for the State of Washington, well temperature information and locations in the State of Washington, and a map of the geology of the White Pass-Tumac Mountain Area, Washington. (MHR)

Korosec, M.A.; Schuster, J.E.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Cattail Protection  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cattail Protection Cattail Protection Name: Julie Location: N/A Country: N/A Date: N/A Question: Is a piece of land protected by cattails protected? (Meaning you can not touch, cover up or build on.) Replies: Hi Julie, It's quite possible that a piece of land with cattails is protected as a wetland. There are some federal (and probably state) statutes on wetland protection, in general you have to file environmental impact statements and such. I've heard of cases where some large projects were allowed to encroach on wetlands when the builders signed contracts requiring they construct a wetland of equivalent size on another parcel of land. Donald Yee Ph.D. I assume you are referring to wetlands protections. Cattails are wetland plants, and there are regulations governing - but not necessarily preventing - the development of wetlands, but cattails are also aggressive and somewhat weedy, so I doubt the presence of cattails alone would be sufficient to call an area a wetland. This is a technical question which all too often lands in legal dispute. Check with the Corps of Engineers, the EPA, and other experts in wetlands delineation and regulation.

460

Salmonid Gamete Preservation in the Snake River Basin, Annual Report 2002.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In spite of an intensive management effort, chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations in the Northwest have not recovered and are currently listed as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. In addition to the loss of diversity from stocks that have already gone extinct, decreased genetic diversity resulting from genetic drift and inbreeding is a major concern. Reduced population and genetic variability diminishes the environmental adaptability of individual species and entire ecological communities. The Nez Perce Tribe (NPT), in cooperation with Washington State University and the University of Idaho, established a germplasm repository in 1992 in order to preserve the remaining salmonid diversity in the region. The germplasm repository provides long-term storage for cryopreserved gametes. Although only male gametes can be cryopreserved, conserving the male component of genetic diversity will maintain future management options for species recovery. NPT efforts have focused on preserving salmon and steelhead gametes from the major river subbasins in the Snake River basin. However, the repository is available for all management agencies to contribute gamete samples from other regions and species. In 2002 a total of 570 viable semen samples were added to the germplasm repository. This included the gametes of 287 chinook salmon from the Lostine River, Catherine Creek, upper Grande Ronde River, Imnaha River (Lookingglass Hatchery), Lake Creek, South Fork Salmon River, Johnson Creek, Big Creek, Capehorn Creek, Marsh Creek, Pahsimeroi River (Pahsimeroi Hatchery), and upper Salmon River (Sawtooth Hatchery) and the gametes of 280 steelhead from the North Fork Clearwater River (Dworshak Hatchery), Fish Creek, Little Sheep Creek, Pahsimeroi River (Pahsimeroi Hatchery) and Snake River (Oxbow Hatchery). In addition, gametes from 60 Yakima River spring chinook and 34 Wenatchee River coho salmon were added to the repository by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Columbia River Intertribal Fish Commission, respectively. To date, a total of 3,928 Columbia River salmon and steelhead gamete samples and three Kootenai River white sturgeon are preserved in the repository. Samples are stored in independent locations at the University of Idaho (UI) and Washington State University (WSU).

Young, William; Kucera, Paul

2003-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE LETTERS 21, 2002, 251 255 Organic-inorganic sol-gel coating for corrosion protection  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for corrosion protection of stainless steel T. P. CHOU Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA E-mail: gzcao@u.washington.edu One of the most effective corrosion example. This is the main reason for the durability and corrosion resistance be- havior of this particular

Cao, Guozhong

462

Assessing the Thermal Environmental Impacts of an Groundwater Heat Pump in Southeastern Washington State  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A thermal analysis of a large-scale (e.g., 1900 gpm), open-loop ground source heat pump (GSHP) installed on the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) campus in southeastern Washington State has been performed using a numerical modeling approach. Water temperature increases at the upgradient extraction wells in the system and at the downgradient Columbia River are potential concerns, especially since heat rejection to the subsurface will occur year-round. Hence, thermal impacts of the open-loop GSHP were investigated to identify operational scenarios that minimized downgradient environmental impacts at the river, and upgradient temperature drift at the production wells. Simulations examined the sensitivity of the system to variations in pumping rates and injected water temperatures, as well as to hydraulic conductivity estimates of the aquifer. Results demonstrated that both downgradient and upgradient thermal impacts were more sensitive to injection flow rates than estimates of hydraulic conductivity. Higher injection rates at lower temperatures resulted in higher temperature increases at the extraction wells but lower increases at the river. Conversely, lower pumping rates and higher injected water temperatures resulted in a smaller temperature increase at the extraction wells, but higher increases at the river. The scenario with lower pumping rates is operationally more efficient, but does increase the likelihood of a thermal plume discharging into the Columbia River. However, this impact would be mitigated by mixing within the hyporheic zone and the Columbia River. The impact under current operational conditions is negligible, but future increases in heat rejection could require a compromise between maximizing operational efficiency and minimizing temperature increases at the shoreline.

Freedman, Vicky L.; Waichler, Scott R.; Mackley, Rob D.; Horner, Jacob A.

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

The 1983 Temperature Gradient and Heat Flow Drilling Project for the State of Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the Summer of 1983, the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources carried out a three-hole drilling program to collect temperature gradient and heat flow information near potential geothermal resource target areas. The project was part of the state-coupled US Department of Energy Geothermal Program. Richardson Well Drilling of Tacoma, Washington was subcontracted through the State to perform the work. The general locations of the project areas are shown in figure 1. The first hole, DNR 83-1, was located within the Green River valley northwest of Mount St. Helens. This site is near the Green River Soda Springs and along the projection of the Mount St. Helens--Elk Lake seismic zone. The other two holes were drilled near Mount Baker. Hole DNR 83-3 was sited about 1/4 km west of the Baker Hot Springs, 10.5 km east of Mount Baker, while hole DNR 83-5 was located along Rocky Creek in the Sulphur Creek Valley. The Rocky Creek hole is about 10 km south-southwest of the peak. Two other holes, DNR 83-2 and DNR 83-4, were located on the north side of the Sulphur Creek Valley. Both holes were abandoned at early stages of drilling because of deep overburden and severe caving problems. The sites were apparently located atop old landslide deposits.

Korosec, Michael A.

1983-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Protective Force  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes requirements for management and operation of the DOE Protective Force (PF), establishes requirements for firearms operations and defines the firearms courses of fire. Cancels: DOE M 473.2-1A DOE M 473.2-2

2005-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

465

Physical Protection  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes requirements for the physical protection of safeguards and security interests. Copies of Section B, Safeguards and Security Alarm Management System, which contains Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information, and Appendix 1, Security Badge Specifications, which contains Official Use Only information, are only available, by request, from the program manager, Protection Program Operations, 301-903-6209. Cancels: DOE M 473.1-1 and DOE M 471.2-1B.

2005-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

466

Physical Protection  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual establishes requirements for the physical protection of safeguards and security interests. Copies of Section B, Safeguards and Security Alarm Management System, which contains Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information, and Appendix 1, Security Badge Specifications, which contains Official Use Only information, are only available, by request, from the program manager, Protection Program Operations, 301-903-6209. Chg 1, dated 3/7/06. Cancels: DOE M 473.1-1 and DOE M 471.2-1B

2005-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

467

Protective Force  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The manual establishes requirements for management and operation of the DOE Protective Force, establishes requirements for firearms operations and defines the firearms courses of fire. Chg 1 dated 3/7/06. DOE M 470.4-3A cancels DOE M 470.4-3, Chg 1, Protective Force, dated 3-7-06, Attachment 2, Contractor Requirement Document (CRD) only (except for Section C). Chg 1, dated 3-7-06, cancels DOE M 470.4-3

2006-03-07T23:59:59.000Z

468

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Olympia, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0378741°, -122.9006951° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0378741,"lon":-122.9006951,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

469

Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0342629°, -122.8231915° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0342629,"lon":-122.8231915,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

470

Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4217682°, -121.972893° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4217682,"lon":-121.972893,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

471

Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5673176°, -122.6326391° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5673176,"lon":-122.6326391,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

472

Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6417664°, -122.0803998° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6417664,"lon":-122.0803998,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

473

Washington Elec Member Corp | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Elec Member Corp Washington Elec Member Corp Place Georgia Utility Id 20146 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes ISO Other Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png 1,000 Watt HPS Cobra Lighting 1,000 Watt HPS Flood Lighting 1,000 Watt MH Flood Lighting 100 Watt HPS Lighting 175 Watt MV 250 Watt HPS Lighting 250 Watt HPS Cobra Head Lighting 250 Watt HPS Flood Lighting 400 Watt HPS Cobra Head Lighting 400 Watt HPS Flood Lighting Rate-01 (RS) Residential Rate-02 (GSND) Commercial Rate-07 (GSD) Commercial Rate-08 (GS) Primary

474

Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.727043°, -122.1795689° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.727043,"lon":-122.1795689,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

475

Washington Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History Natural Gas in Storage 30,412 33,787 37,711 40,833 43,621 45,359 1990-2013

476

Notices 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11 Federal Register 11 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. Dated: June 20, 2011. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011-15859 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]

477

Milton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Milton, Washington: Energy Resources Milton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.2481558°, -122.312899° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2481558,"lon":-122.312899,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

478

Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Spokane, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6587802°, -117.4260466° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6587802,"lon":-117.4260466,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

479

Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4623237°, -121.9956724° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4623237,"lon":-121.9956724,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

480

Bonneville Power Admin (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bonneville Power Admin Bonneville Power Admin Place Washington Utility Id 1738 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Industrial: $0.0046/kWh The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for Bonneville Power Admin (Washington). Month RES REV (THOUSAND $) RES SALES (MWH) RES CONS COM REV (THOUSAND $) COM SALES (MWH) COM CONS IND_REV (THOUSAND $) IND SALES (MWH) IND CONS OTH REV (THOUSAND $) OTH SALES (MWH) OTH CONS TOT REV (THOUSAND $) TOT SALES (MWH) TOT CONS 2009-03 2,220.339 71,908.718 8 2,220.339 71,908.718 8

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington river protection" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Notices 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

53 Federal Register 53 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Notices 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ''eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ''eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 2, 2013. Dated: March 15, 2013. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013-06602 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

482

Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5301011°, -122.0326191° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5301011,"lon":-122.0326191,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

483

Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5287132°, -121.8253906° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5287132,"lon":-121.8253906,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}