National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for washington river protection

  1. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington River...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford - Feb 2014 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford - Feb 2014 February...

  2. Washington River Protection Solutions - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contracting Washington River Protection Solutions Contracting ORP Contracts and Procurements RL Contracts and Procurements CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Mission Support Alliance Washington Closure Hanford HPM Corporation (HPMC) Wastren Advantage, Inc. Bechtel National, Inc. Washington River Protection Solutions Washington River Protection Solutions Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC logo The operation

  3. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington River Protection

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Solutions, LLC, Hanford - Feb 2014 | Department of Energy Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford - Feb 2014 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford - Feb 2014 February 13, 2014 Evaluation to determine whether Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford is performing at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition. PDF icon Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Hanford

  4. DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Contract at Hanford Site | Department of Energy Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and

  5. Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC- October 2011

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations [HIAR-ORP-2011-10-26

  6. Award Fee Determination Scorecard Contractor: Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Contract: Tank Operations Contract Contract Number: DE-AC27-08RV14800 Award Fee Period: October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015 Basis of Evaluation: FY 2015 Award Fee, Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan Award Fee Available: $15,600,000 Award Fee Earned: $13,728,000 (88%) Award Fee Area Adjectival Ratings for each Award Fee Special Emphasis Area (SEA): Functional Element Adjectival Rating* SEA 1: Management of Single-Shell (SST) and Double-Shell

  7. Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 Consent Order, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - NCO-2011-01 May 27, 2011 Issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC related to deficiencies in the corrective action management program, radiation control program, and sealed radioactive source accountability and control program On May 27, 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and

  8. OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1-6-60 Richland, Washington 99352 SEP 3 0 2013 13 -CPM-0262 Mr. Charles A. Simpson, Contracts Manager Washington River Protection Solutions LLC 2440 Stevens Center Place Richland, Washington 99354 Mr. Simpson: CONTRACT NO. DE-AC27-08RVI4800 - TRANSMITTAL OF CONTRACT MODIFICATION 231 The purpose of this letter is to transmit the fully-executed Contract Modification 23 1. This modification revises the contract price for the base contract period and updates Section J, Attachment J.4, Performance

  9. Washington Closure Hanford: Cleanup Progress Along Hanford's River Corridor

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    | Department of Energy from the 2015 DOE National Cleanup Workshop by Scott Sax, President, Washington Closure Hanford. PDF icon Washington Closure Hanford: Cleanup Progress Along Hanford's River Corridor More Documents & Publications 2014 Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus Briefings 2013 Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus Briefings Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure Project - June 2012

  10. Washington River Protection Solutions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Management and operation of the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF), the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF), and the Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF) in...

  11. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington Closure...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Washington Closure Hanford VPP Report - March 2009 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington Closure Hanford VPP Report - March 2009 March 2009 Evaluation to determine...

  12. Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Closure, LLC | Department of Energy Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC March 23, 2005 - 10:56am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman today announced that Washington Closure, LLC has been awarded the contract to manage the clean up and remediation of the Columbia River Corridor at the Department of Energy's Hanford Reservation in the state of Washington. The

  13. Washington Closure Hanford: Ten Years of River Corridor Cleanup |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Washington Closure Hanford: Ten Years of River Corridor Cleanup Washington Closure Hanford: Ten Years of River Corridor Cleanup December 17, 2015 - 12:30pm Addthis Contract-Timeline-E1511010_4-B_756px.jpg This timeline shows contractor Washington Closure Hanford's accomplishments over the past 10 years through its River Corridor Closure Contract. Addthis Related Articles EM Update Newsletter Spotlights River Corridor Cleanup at Hanford Site River Corridor Achievements

  14. Office of River Protection - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Office of River Protection Office of River Protection Office of River Protection Office of River Protection Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease...

  15. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Opperations Office | Department of Energy River Protection-Richland Opperations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland Opperations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Office of River Protection-Richland Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 29, 2014 CX-012727: Categorical Exclusion Determination CHPRC Cleanup Actions CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 41849 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations

  16. Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions,

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    LLC (WRPS) Partnering Agreement for the DOE-EM Tank Operations Project | Department of Energy Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) Partnering Agreement for the DOE-EM Tank Operations Project Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) Partnering Agreement for the DOE-EM Tank Operations Project The Mission of the Office of River Protection is to safely retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the Tank Farms

  17. Richland/Office of River Protection | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Below are compliance agreements and accompanying summaries for the Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection at the Hanford site. PDF icon Settlement Agreement re: Washington v. Bodman, January 6, 2006 PDF icon Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 PDF icon Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Summary PDF icon Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 PDF icon

  18. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure Project

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    - June 2012 | Department of Energy River Corridor Closure Project - June 2012 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure Project - June 2012 June 2012 Evaluation to determine whether River Corridor Closure Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition. The Team conducted its review during June 11 - 14, 2012 to determine whether Washington Closure Hanford, LLC is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition. PDF

  19. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington Closure Hanford VPP

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Report - March 2009 | Department of Energy Closure Hanford VPP Report - March 2009 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Washington Closure Hanford VPP Report - March 2009 March 2009 Evaluation to determine whether Washington Closure Hanford, LLC is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition. The Team conducted its review during March 23-April 3, 2009 to determine whether Washington Closure Hanford, LLC is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star

  20. FY 2006 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration 6 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  1. FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration 7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  2. FY 2008 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  3. Office of River Protection - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Office of River Protection Office of River Protection About ORP ORP Projects & Facilities Newsroom Contracts & Procurements Contact ORP Office of River Protection Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Hanford.gov Site Maintenance PHOENIX Tanks - Live Now Public Involvement Evaluation Survey Hanford Public Comment Period UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of River Protection The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site in southeast

  4. OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION P.O. Box 450, MSIN H6-60

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    MAR 05 2013 1 3-CPM-0037 Mr. Charles A. Simpson, Contracts Manager Washington River Protection Solutions LLC 2440 Stevens Center Place Richland, WA 99354 Mr. Simpson: CONTRACT NO. DE-AC27-08RV 14800 - TRANSMITTAL OF CONTRACT MODIFICATION 200 The purpose of this letter is to transmit the fully executed Contract Modification 200. This Change Order modification is to direct Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) to begin field testing of an alternative dome cutting technology and

  5. River Protection Project (RPP) Project Management Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NAVARRO, J.E.

    2001-03-07

    The Office of River Protection (ORP) Project Management Plan (PMP) for the River Protection Project (RPP) describes the process for developing and operating a Waste Treatment Complex (WTC) to clean up Hanford Site tank waste. The Plan describes the scope of the project, the institutional setting within which the project must be completed, and the management processes and structure planned for implementation. The Plan is written from the perspective of the ORP as the taxpayers' representative. The Hanford Site, in southeastern Washington State, has one of the largest concentrations of radioactive waste in the world, as a result of producing plutonium for national defense for more than 40 years. Approximately 53 million gallons of waste stored in 177 aging underground tanks represent major environmental, social, and political challenges for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). These challenges require numerous interfaces with state and federal environmental officials, Tribal Nations, stakeholders, Congress, and the US Department of Energy-Headquarters (DOE-HQ). The cleanup of the Site's tank waste is a national issue with the potential for environmental and economic impacts to the region and the nation.

  6. Clallam County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Blyn, Washington Carlsborg, Washington Forks, Washington Neah Bay, Washington Port Angeles East, Washington Port Angeles, Washington River Road, Washington Sequim,...

  7. Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Office of River Protection - May 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May 2013 May 2013 Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River...

  8. RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT SYSTEM PLAN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    CERTA PJ

    2008-07-10

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection (ORP) manages the River Protection Project (RPP). The RPP mission is to retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the tank farms to protect the Columbia River. As a result, the ORP is responsible for the retrieval, treatment, and disposal of the approximately 57 million gallons of radioactive waste contained in the Hanford Site waste tanks and closure of all the tanks and associated facilities. The previous revision of the System Plan was issued in September 2003. ORP has approved a number of changes to the tank waste treatment strategy and plans since the last revision of this document, and additional changes are under consideration. The ORP has established contracts to implement this strategy to establish a basic capability to complete the overall mission. The current strategy for completion of the mission uses a number of interrelated activities. The ORP will reduce risk to the environment posed by tank wastes by: (1) Retrieving the waste from the single-shell tanks (SST) to double-shell tanks (DST) for treatment and disposal; (2) Constructing and operating the WTP, which will safely treat all of the high-level waste (HLW) and about half of the low-activity waste (LAW) contained in the tank farms, and maximizing its capability and capacity; (3) Developing and deploying supplemental treatment capability or a second WTP LAW Facility that can safely treat about half of the LAW contained in the tank farms; (4) Developing and deploying treatment and packaging capability for transuranic (TRU) tank waste for shipment to and disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP); (5) Deploying interim storage capacity for the immobilized HLW and shipping that waste to Yucca Mountain for disposal; (6) Operating the Integrated Disposal Facility for the disposal of immobilized LAW, along with the associated secondary waste, (7) Closing the SST and DST tank farms, ancillary facilities, and al1 waste management and treatment facilities, (8) Developing and implementing technical solutions to mitigate the impact from substantial1y increased estimates of Na added during the pretreatment of the tank waste solids, This involves a combination of: (1) refining or modifying the flowsheet to reduce the required amount of additional sodium, (2) increasing the overall LAW vitrification capacity, (3) increasing the incorporation of sodium into the LAW glass, or (4) accepting an increase in mission duration, ORP has made and continues to make modifications to the WTP contract as needed to improve projected plant performance and address known or emerging risks, Key elements of the implementation of this strategy are included within the scope of the Tank Operations Contract, currently in procurement Since 2003, the ORP has conducted over 30 design oversight assessments of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The estimated cost at completion has increased and the schedule for construction and commissioning of the WTP has extended, The DOE, Office of Environmental Management (EM), sanctioned a comprehensive review of the WTP flowsheet, focusing on throughput. In 2005, the TFC completed interim stabilization of the SSTs and as of March 2007, has completed the retrieval of seven selected SSTs. Demonstration of supplemental treatment technologies continues. The ongoing tank waste retrieval experience, progress with supplemental treatment technologies, and changes in WTP schedule led to the FY 2007 TFC baseline submittal in November 2006. The TFC baseline submittal was developed before the WTP schedule was fully understood and approved by ORP, and therefore reflects an earlier start date for the WTP facilities. This System Plan is aligned with the current WTP schedule with hot commissioning beginning in 2018 and full operations beginning in 2019. Major decisions regarding the use of supplemental treatment and the associated technology, the ultimate needed capacity, and its relationship to the WTP have not yet been finalized. This System Plan assumes that the outcome of

  9. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Remediation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Savannah River Remediation, Llc, Liquid Waste Contract, Savannah River Site - November 2014 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Remediation, Llc, Liquid...

  10. CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section ...

  11. Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms - February 2013 Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms - February...

  12. EM's Office of River Protection Completes Waste Retrieval in...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Office of River Protection Completes Waste Retrieval in Another Hanford Tank EM's Office of River Protection Completes Waste Retrieval in Another Hanford Tank December 29, 2015 -...

  13. RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT SYSTEM PLAN

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    CERTA PJ; KIRKBRIDE RA; HOHL TM; EMPEY PA; WELLS MN

    2009-09-15

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection (ORP) manages the River Protection Project (RPP). The RPP mission is to retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the tank farms to protect the Columbia River. As a result, ORP is responsible for the retrieval, treatment, and disposal of approximately 57 million gallons 1 of radioactive waste contained in the Hanford Site waste tanks and closure2 of all the tanks and associated facilities. The previous revision of the System Plan was issued in May 2008. ORP has made a number of changes to the tank waste treatment strategy and plans since the last revision of this document, and additional changes are under consideration. ORP has contracts in place to implement the strategy for completion of the mission and establish the capability to complete the overall mission. The current strategl involves a number of interrelated activities. ORP will reduce risk to the environment posed by tank wastes by the following: (1) Retrieving the waste from the single-shell tanks (SST) to double-shell tanks (DST) and delivering the waste to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). (2) Constructing and operating the WTP, which will safely treat all of the high-level waste (HLW) fraction contained in the tank farms. About one-third of the low-activity waste (LAW) fraction separated from the HLW fraction in the WTP will be immobilized in the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility. (3) Developing and deploying supplemental treatment capability assumed to be a second LAW vitrification facility that can safely treat about two-thirds of the LAW contained in the tank farms. (4) Developing and deploying supplemental pretreatment capability currently assumed to be an Aluminum Removal Facility (ARF) using a lithium hydrotalcite process to mitigate sodium management issues. (5) Developing and deploying treatment and packaging capability for contact-handled transuranic (CH-TRU) tank waste for possible shipment to and disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico. (6) Deploying interim storage capacity for the immobilized high-level waste (IHLW) pending determination of the final disposal pathway. (7) Closing the SST and DST tank farms, ancillary facilities, and all associated waste management and treatment facilities. (8) Optimizing the overall mission by resolution of technical and programmatic uncertainties, configuring the tank farms to provide a steady, well-balanced feed to the WTP, and performing trade-offs of the required amount and type of supplemental treatment and of the amount of HLW glass versus LAW glass. ORP has made and continues to make modifications to the WTP contract as needed to improve projected plant performance and address known or emerging risks. Key elements needed to implement the strategy described above are included within the scope of the Tank Operations Contract (TOC). Interim stabilization of the SSTs was completed in March 2004. As of April 2009, retrieval of seven SSTs has been completed and retrieval of four additional SSTs has been completed to the limits of technology. Demonstration of supplemental LAW treatment technologies has stopped temporarily pending revision of mission need requirements. Award of a new contract for tank operations (TOC), the ongoing tank waste retrieval experience, HLW disposal issues, and uncertainties in waste feed delivery and waste treatment led to the revision of the Performance Measurement Baseline (PM B), which is currently under review prior to approval. 6 This System Plan is aligned with the current WTP schedule, with hot commissioning beginning in 2018, and full operations beginning in late 2019. Major decisions regarding the use of supplemental treatment and the associated technology, the ultimate needed capacity, and its relationship to the WTP have not yet been finalized. This System Plan assumes that the outcome of these decisions will be to provide a second LAW vitrification facility. No final implementation decisions regarding supplemental technology can be made until the Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement is completed and a Record of Decision is issued by DOE. Technical solutions are being developed to mitigate the impact from substantially increased estimates of sodium to be added during pretreatment of the tank waste solids. This may involve one or more of the following options: (1) refining or modifying the flowsheet to reduce the required amount of additional sodium, (2) increasing the overall LAW vitrification capacity, (3) increasing the incorporation of sodium into the LAW glass, (4) increasing the incorporation of aluminum in the HLW glass to reduce caustic leaching requirements, or (5) implementing other technical solutions. For planning purposes, the PMB assumes that option (5) above, in the form of an ARF, will be successful in reducing the sodium required to be added during pretreatment of the tank waste.

  14. Office of River Protection's (ORP) Path to Reinvigorating Technology

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Development | Department of Energy River Protection's (ORP) Path to Reinvigorating Technology Development Office of River Protection's (ORP) Path to Reinvigorating Technology Development Presentation from the 2015 DOE National Cleanup Workshop by Kevin Smith, Manager, Office of River Protection. PDF icon ORP's Path to Reinvigorating Technology Development More Documents & Publications Office of River Protection (ORP) and Washingotn River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) Partnering

  15. PROTECTING GROUNDWATER & THE COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE HANFORD SITE

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    GERBER, M.S.

    2006-06-29

    Along the remote shores of the Columbia River in southeast Washington state, a race is on. Fluor Hanford, a prime cleanup contractor to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Hanford Site, is managing a massive, multi-faceted project to remove contaminants from the groundwater before they can reach the Columbia. Despite the daunting nature and size of the problem--about 80 square miles of aquifer under the site contains long-lived radionuclides and hazardous chemicals--significant progress is being made. Many groups are watching, speaking out, and helping. A large. passionate, diverse, and geographically dispersed community is united in its desire to protect the Columbia River--the eighth largest in the world--and have a voice in Hanford's future. Fluor Hanford and the DOE, along with the US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) interact with all the stakeholders to make the best decisions. Together, they have made some remarkable strides in the battle against groundwater contamination under the site.

  16. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Nuclear

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Solutions, Llc Savannah River Site - October 2014 | Department of Energy River Nuclear Solutions, Llc Savannah River Site - October 2014 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, Llc Savannah River Site - October 2014 October 2014 Recertification of SRNS as a Star Participant in the Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program. This report summarizes the results from the evaluation of Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC (SRNS), at the Savannah River

  17. Office of River Protection's (ORP) Path to Reinvigorating Technology...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Office of River Protection's (ORP) Path to Reinvigorating Technology Development Presentation from the 2015 DOE National Cleanup Workshop by Kevin Smith, Manager, Office of River ...

  18. CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to ...

  19. Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    2013 | Department of Energy Office of River Protection - May 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May 2013 May 2013 Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection [HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards

  20. River Protection Project (RPP) Project Management Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    SEEMAN, S.E.

    2000-04-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in accordance with the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999, established the Office of River Protection (ORP) to successfully execute and manage the River Protection Project (RPP), formerly known as the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS). The mission of the RPP is to store, retrieve, treat, and dispose of the highly radioactive Hanford tank waste in an environmentally sound, safe, and cost-effective manner. The team shown in Figure 1-1 is accomplishing the project. The ORP is providing the management and integration of the project; the Tank Farm Contractor (TFC) is responsible for providing tank waste storage, retrieval, and disposal; and the Privatization Contractor (PC) is responsible for providing tank waste treatment.

  1. HANFORD SITE RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT (RPP) TANK FARM CLOSURE

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    JARAYSI, M.N.; SMITH, Z.; QUINTERO, R.; BURANDT, M.B.; HEWITT, W.

    2006-01-30

    The U. S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection and the CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. are responsible for the operations, cleanup, and closure activities at the Hanford Tank Farms. There are 177 tanks overall in the tank farms, 149 single-shell tanks (see Figure 1), and 28 double-shell tanks (see Figure 2). The single-shell tanks were constructed 40 to 60 years ago and all have exceeded their design life. The single-shell tanks do not meet Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 [1] requirements. Accordingly, radioactive waste is being retrieved from the single-shell tanks and transferred to double-shell tanks for storage prior to treatment through vitrification and disposal. Following retrieval of as much waste as is technically possible from the single-shell tanks, the Office of River Protection plans to close the single-shell tanks in accordance with the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order [2] and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [3] requirements. The double-shell tanks will remain in operation through much of the cleanup mission until sufficient waste has been treated such that the Office of River Protection can commence closing the double-shell tanks. At the current time, however, the focus is on retrieving waste and closing the single-shell tanks. The single-shell tanks are being managed and will be closed in accordance with the pertinent requirements in: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and its Washington State-authorized Dangerous Waste Regulations [4], US DOE Order 435.1 Radioactive Waste Management [5], the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [6], and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 [7]. The Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, which is commonly referred to as the Tri-Party Agreement or TPA, was originally signed by Department of Energy, the State of Washington, and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1989. Meanwhile, the retrieval of the waste is under way and is being conducted to achieve the completion criteria established in the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order.

  2. River Protection Project (RPP) Dangerous Waste Training Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    POHTO, R.E.

    2000-03-09

    This supporting document contains the training plan for dangerous waste management at River Protection Project TSD Units. This document outlines the dangerous waste training program developed and implemented for all Treatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD) Units operated by River Protection Project (RPP) in the Hanford 200 East, 200 West and 600 Areas and the <90 Day Accumulation Area at 209E. Operating TSD Units managed by RPP are: the Double-Shell Tank (DST) System, 204-AR Waste Unloading Facility, Grout, and the Single-Shell Tank (SST) System. The program is designed in compliance with the requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303-330 and Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 265.16 for the development of a written dangerous waste training program and the Hanford Facility Permit. Training requirements were determined by an assessment of employee duties and responsibilities. The RPP training program is designed to prepare employees to operate and maintain the Tank Farms in a safe, effective, efficient, and environmentally sound manner. In addition to preparing employees to operate and maintain the Tank Farms under normal conditions, the training program ensures that employees are prepared to respond in a prompt and effective manner should abnormal or emergency conditions occur. Emergency response training is consistent with emergency responses outlined in the following Building Emergency Plans: HNF-IP-0263-TF and HNF-=IP-0263-209E.

  3. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Remediation,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Llc, Liquid Waste Contract, Savannah River Site - November 2014 | Department of Energy Savannah River Remediation, Llc, Liquid Waste Contract, Savannah River Site - November 2014 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Remediation, Llc, Liquid Waste Contract, Savannah River Site - November 2014 November 2014 Recertification of SRR as a Star Participant in the Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program. This report summarizes the results from the evaluation of

  4. Contractor Fee Payments - Office of River Protection | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Office of River Protection Contractor Fee Payments - Office of River Protection See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Office of River Protection on these charts. PDF icon Laboratory Analytical Services & Testing PDF icon Tank Operations PDF icon Waste Treatment Plant Design & Construction More Documents & Publications Contractor Fee Payments - Savannah River Operations Office Contractor Fee Payments -

  5. Assessment of Salmonids and their Habitat Conditions in the Walla Walla River Basin within Washington, 2001 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mendel, Glen Wesley; Trump, Jeremy; Karl, David

    2002-12-01

    Concerns about the decline of native salmon and trout populations have increased among natural resource managers and the public in recent years. As a result, a multitude of initiatives have been implemented at the local, state, and federal government levels. These initiatives include management plans and actions intended to protect and restore salmonid fishes and their habitats. In 1998 bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) were listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), as ''Threatened'', for the Walla Walla River and its tributaries. Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were listed as ''Threatened'' in 1999 for the mid-Columbia River and its tributaries. These ESA listings emphasize the need for information about these threatened salmonid populations and their habitats. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) is entrusted with ''the preservation, protection, and perpetuation of fish and wildlife....[and to] maximize public recreational or commercial opportunities without impairing the supply of fish and wildlife (WAC 77.12.010).'' In consideration of this mandate, the WDFW submitted a proposal in December 1997 to the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for a study to assess salmonid distribution, relative abundance, genetics, and the condition of salmonid habitats in the Walla Walla River basin. The primary purposes of this project are to collect baseline biological and habitat data, to identify major data gaps, and to draw conclusions whenever possible. The study reported herein details the findings of the 2001 field season (March to November, 2001).

  6. Assessment of Salmonids and their Habitat Conditions in the Walla Walla River Basin of Washington : 2000 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mendel, Glen Wesley; Karl, David; Coyle, Terrence

    2001-11-01

    Concerns about the decline of native salmon and trout populations have increased among natural resource managers and the public in recent years. As a result, a multitude of initiatives have been implemented at the local, state, and federal government levels. These initiatives include management plans and actions intended to protect and restore salmonid fishes and their habitats. In 1998 bull trout were listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), as ''Threatened'', for the Walla Walla River and its tributaries. Steelhead were listed as ''Threatened'' in 1999 for the mid-Columbia River and its tributaries. These ESA listings emphasize the need for information about the threatened salmonid populations and their habitats. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) is entrusted with ''the preservation, protection, and perpetuation of fish and wildlife....[and to] maximize public recreational or commercial opportunities without impairing the supply of fish and wildlife (WAC 77. 12.010).'' In consideration of this mandate, the WDFW submitted a proposal in December 1997 to the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for a study to assess salmonid distribution, relative abundance, genetics, and the condition of their habitats in the Walla Walla River basin. The primary purposes of this project are to collect baseline biological and habitat data, to identify major data gaps, and to draw conclusions whenever possible. The study reported herein details the findings of the 2000 field season (March to November, 2000).

  7. Award Fee Determination Scorecard Contractor: Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contract: Tank Operations Contract Contract Number: DE-AC27-08RV14800 Award Fee Period: October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014 Basis of Evaluation: FY 2014 Award Fee, Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan Award Fee Available: $12,597,052 Award Fee Earned: $10,459,418 (83.0%) Award Fee Area Adjectival Ratings for each Award Fee Special Emphasis Area (SEA): Functional Element Adjectival Rating* SEA 1: Management of Single-Shell (SST) and Double-Shell Tank (DST) System Excellent SEA 2:

  8. DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... For additional information on the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management and the Hanford site. Media contact(s): Joann Wardrip, (202) 586-4940 Carrie Meyer, ...

  9. River Protection Project (RPP) Environmental Program Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    POWELL, P.A.

    2000-03-29

    This Environmental Program Plan was developed in support of the Integrated Environment, Safety, and Health Management System Plan (ISMS) (RPP-MP-003), which establishes a single, defined environmental, safety, and health management system that integrates requirements into the work planning and execution processes to protect workers, the public, and the environment. The ISMS also provides mechanisms for increasing worker involvement in work planning, including hazard and environmental impact identification, analysis, and control; work execution; and feedback/improvement processes. The ISMS plan consists of six core functions. Each section of this plan describes the activities of the River Protection Project (RPP) (formerly known as the Tank Waste Remediation System) Environmental organization according to the following core functions: Establish Environmental Policy; Define the Scope of Work; Identify Hazards, Environmental Impacts, and Requirements; Analyze Hazards and Environmental Impacts and Implement Controls; Perform Work within Controls; and Provide Feedback and Continuous Improvement.

  10. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of River Protection (ORP) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy River Protection (ORP) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of River Protection (ORP) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Oak Ridge Operations Office (OR) (See EM and SC APS). PDF icon 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of River Protection (ORP) More Documents & Publications 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Richland Operations Office (RL) 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Fossil

  11. BPA celebrates protection of Lemhi River fish and wildlife habitat

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    celebrates-protection-of-Lemhi-River-fish-and-wildlife-habitat Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives...

  12. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Nuclear...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Llc Savannah River Site - October 2014 October 2014 Recertification of SRNS as a Star Participant in the Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program. This report...

  13. Geological and Geothermal Investigation of the Lower Wind River Valley, Southwestern Washington Cascade Range

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Berri, Dulcy A.; Korosec, Michael A.

    1983-01-01

    The Wind River Valley, on the west slope of the Cascade Range, is a northwest-trending drainage that joins the Columbia River near Carson, Washington. The region has been heavily dissected by fluvial and glacial erosion. Ridges have sharp crests and deep subsidiary valleys typical of a mature topography, with a total relief of as much as 900 m. The region is vegetated by fir and hemlock, as well as dense, brushy ground-cover and undergrowth. The lower 8 km of the valley is privately owned and moderately populated. The upper reaches lies within the Gifford Pinchot National Forest, and include several campgrounds and day parks, the Carson National Fish Hatchery, and the Wind River Ranger Station and Wind River Nursery of the US Forest Service. Logging activity is light due to the rugged terrain, and consequently, most valley slopes are not accessible by vehicle. The realization that a potential for significant geothermal resources exists in the Wind River area was brought about by earlier exploration activities. Geologic mapping and interpretation was needed to facilitate further exploration of the resource by providing a knowledge of possible geologic controls on the geothermal system. This report presents the detailed geology of the lower Wind River valley with emphasis on those factors that bear significantly on development of a geothermal resource.

  14. CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Waste System | Department of Energy Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Emergency Management program at the Office of River

  15. The CHPRC Columbia River Protection Project Quality Assurance Project Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fix, N. J.

    2008-11-30

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory researchers are working on the CHPRC Columbia River Protection Project (hereafter referred to as the Columbia River Project). This is a follow-on project, funded by CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company, LLC (CHPRC), to the Fluor Hanford, Inc. Columbia River Protection Project. The work scope consists of a number of CHPRC funded, related projects that are managed under a master project (project number 55109). All contract releases associated with the Fluor Hanford Columbia River Project (Fluor Hanford, Inc. Contract 27647) and the CHPRC Columbia River Project (Contract 36402) will be collected under this master project. Each project within the master project is authorized by a CHPRC contract release that contains the project-specific statement of work. This Quality Assurance Project Plan provides the quality assurance requirements and processes that will be followed by the Columbia River Project staff.

  16. FTCP Site Specific Information - Office of River Protection | Department

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    of Energy River Protection FTCP Site Specific Information - Office of River Protection FTCP Agent Organization Name Phone E-Mail ORP Ricky D. Hyson 509/376-0865 Ricky_D_Hyson@orp.doe.gov Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Reports Calendar Year 2014 Calendar Year 2013 Calendar Year 2012 Calendar Year 2011 Calendar Year 2010 TQP Self-Assessment ORP TQP Self-Assessment, February 2014

  17. EM's Office of River Protection Completes Waste Retrieval in Another

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Hanford Tank | Department of Energy Office of River Protection Completes Waste Retrieval in Another Hanford Tank EM's Office of River Protection Completes Waste Retrieval in Another Hanford Tank December 29, 2015 - 1:10pm Addthis Cranes remove a sluicer from tank C-102 midway through retrieval to replace it with a new piece of equipment. The sluicer is wrapped in two layers of thick plastic to prevent contamination from entering the environment or harming workers. Cranes remove a sluicer

  18. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection- December 2010

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at the Office of River Protection

  19. Washington Closure Hanford: Cleanup Progress Along Hanford's...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Sax, President, Washington Closure Hanford. Washington Closure Hanford: Cleanup Progress Along Hanford's River Corridor More Documents & Publications 2014 Congressional Nuclear...

  20. Department of Energy Cites Washington Group International, Inc. for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Violations

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Department of Energy has issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Washington Group International, Inc. (WGI) for a September 2010 incident that violated the...

  1. OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION P.O. Box 450, MSIN H6-60

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Office of River Protection P.O. Box 45) P.O. Box 450 Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 Richland WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF...

  2. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Office of River Protection | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy River Protection 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Office of River Protection The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Office of River Protection. PDF icon APS-2012-ORP.pdf More Documents & Publications 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, RMOTC, and Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of River Protection (ORP) 2012

  3. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington- June 2008

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Evaluation to determine whether Fluor Federal Services in Richland, Washington is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

  4. The Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Quality Assurance Project Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fix, N. J.

    2008-03-12

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory researchers are working on the Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Project. This project is a U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management-funded initiative designed to develop new methods, strategies, and technologies for characterizing, modeling, remediating, and monitoring soils and groundwater contaminated with metals, radionuclides, and chlorinated organics. This Quality Assurance Project Plan provides the quality assurance requirements and processes that will be followed by the Technologies Project staff.

  5. Ground water flow velocity in the bank of the Columbia River, Hanford, Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ballard, S.

    1995-12-01

    To properly characterize the transport of contaminants from the sediments beneath the Hanford Site into the Columbia River, a suite of In Situ Permeable Flow Sensors was deployed to accurately characterize the hydrologic regime in the banks of the river. The three dimensional flow velocity was recorded on an hourly basis from mid May to mid July, 1994 and for one week in September. The first data collection interval coincided with the seasonal high water level in the river while the second interval reflected conditions during relatively low seasonal river stage. Two flow sensors located approximately 50 feet from the river recorded flow directions which correlated very well with river stage, both on seasonal and diurnal time scales. During time intervals characterized by falling river stage, the flow sensors recorded flow toward the river while flow away from the river was recorded during times of rising river stage. The flow sensor near the river in the Hanford Formation recorded a component of flow oriented vertically downward, probably reflecting the details of the hydrostratigraphy in close proximity to the probe. The flow sensor near the river in the Ringold Formation recorded an upward component of flow which dominated the horizontal components most of the time. The upward flow in the Ringold probably reflects regional groundwater flow into the river. The magnitudes of the flow velocities recorded by the flow sensors were lower than expected, probably as a result of drilling induced disturbance of the hydraulic properties of the sediments around the probes. The probes were installed with resonant sonic drilling which may have compacted the sediments immediately surrounding the probes, thereby reducing the hydraulic conductivity adjacent to the probes and diverting the groundwater flow away from the sensors.

  6. EA-2030: Middle Entiat River Habitat Restoration Project; Chelan County, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bonneville Power Administration, in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation, is preparing an EA that evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to improve native fish habitat quality and quantity along a 4-mile section of the Entiat River and improve floodplain function by reconnecting the river with historic side channels and placing logs to direct river flow into side channels and onto the floodplain.

  7. Low-temperature geothermal assessment of the Santa Clara and Virgin River Valleys, Washington County, Utah

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Budding, K.E.; Sommer, S.N.

    1986-01-01

    Exploration techniques included the following: (1) a temperature survey of springs, (2) chemical analyses and calculated geothermometer temperatures of water samples collected from selected springs and wells, (3) chemical analyses and calculated geothermometer temperatures of spring and well water samples in the literature, (4) thermal gradients measured in accessible wells, and (5) geology. The highest water temperature recorded in the St. George basin is 42/sup 0/C at Pah Tempe Hot Springs. Additional spring temperatures higher than 20/sup 0/C are at Veyo Hot Spring, Washington hot pot, and Green Spring. The warmest well water in the study area is 40/sup 0/C in Middleton Wash. Additional warm well water (higher than 24.5/sup 0/C) is present north of St. George, north of Washington, southeast of St. George, and in Dameron Valley. The majority of the Na-K-Ca calculated reservoir temperatures range between 30/sup 0/ and 50/sup 0/C. Anomalous geothermometer temperatures were calculated for water from Pah Tempe and a number of locations in St. George and vicinity. In addition to the known thermal areas of Pah Tempe and Veyo Hot Spring, an area north of Washington and St. George is delineated in this study to have possible low-temperature geothermal potential.

  8. Office of River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    One-Year Extension | Department of Energy Office of River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives One-Year Extension Office of River Protection Women-Owned Small Business Contractor Receives One-Year Extension December 19, 2012 - 10:33am Addthis Richland - - The Energy Department's Office of River Protection announced the contract for Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International Inc. (ATL) has been extended for a second one-year option. ATL, a women-owned small

  9. VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM ONSITE REVIEW, Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington February 26- March 2, 2001

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Team’s evaluation of Fluor Federal Services Richland, Washington during the period of February 26 - March 2, 2001, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the company’s continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

  10. 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of River Protection and Richland Operations Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Office of River Protection and Richland Operations Office.

  11. Water Quality Sampling Locations Along the Shoreline of the Columbia River, Hanford Site, Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Peterson, Robert E.; Patton, Gregory W.

    2009-12-14

    As environmental monitoring evolved on the Hanford Site, several different conventions were used to name or describe location information for various sampling sites along the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River. These methods range from handwritten descriptions in field notebooks to the use of modern electronic surveying equipment, such as Global Positioning System receivers. These diverse methods resulted in inconsistent archiving of analytical results in various electronic databases and published reports because of multiple names being used for the same site and inaccurate position data. This document provides listings of sampling sites that are associated with groundwater and river water sampling. The report identifies names and locations for sites associated with sampling: (a) near-river groundwater using aquifer sampling tubes; (b) riverbank springs and springs areas; (c) pore water collected from riverbed sediment; and (d) Columbia River water. Included in the listings are historical names used for a particular site and the best available geographic coordinates for the site, as of 2009. In an effort to create more consistency in the descriptive names used for water quality sampling sites, a naming convention is proposed in this document. The convention assumes that a unique identifier is assigned to each site that is monitored and that this identifier serves electronic database management requirements. The descriptive name is assigned for the convenience of the subsequent data user. As the historical database is used more intensively, this document may be revised as a consequence of discovering potential errors and also because of a need to gain consensus on the proposed naming convention for some water quality monitoring sites.

  12. The Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Quality Assurance Project Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fix, N. J.

    2007-01-10

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has conducted interim groundwater remedial activities on the Hanford Site since the mid-1990s for several groundwater contamination plumes. DOE established the Columbia River Protection Supplemental Technologies Project (Technologies Project) in 2006 to evaluate alternative treatment technologies. The objectives for the technology project are as follows: develop a 300 Area polyphosphate treatability test to immobilize uranium, design and test infiltration of a phosphate/apatite technology for Sr-90 at 100-N, perform carbon tetrachloride and chloroform attenuation parameter studies, perform vadose zone chromium characterization and geochemistry studies, perform in situ biostimulation of chromium studies for a reducing barrier at 100-D, and perform a treatability test for phytoremediation for Sr-90 at 100-N. This document provides the quality assurance guidelines that will be followed by the Technologies Project. This Quality Assurance Project Plan is based on the quality assurance requirements of DOE Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance, and 10 CFR 830, Subpart A--Quality Assurance Requirements as delineated in Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s Standards-Based Management System. In addition, the technology project is subject to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA/240/B-01/003, QA/R-5). The Hanford Analytical Services Quality Assurance Requirements Documents (HASQARD, DOE/RL-96-68) apply to portions of this project and to the subcontractors. HASQARD requirements are discussed within applicable sections of this plan.

  13. Washington - Compare - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Washington Washington

  14. Washington - Rankings - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Washington Washington

  15. Washington - Search - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Washington Washington

  16. CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    | Department of Energy Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Engineering - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Engineering program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs

  17. Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower complexes on large rivers in Eastern Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Arntzen, Evan V.; Miller, Benjamin L.; O'Toole, Amanda C.; Niehus, Sara E.; Richmond, Marshall C.

    2013-03-15

    Water bodies, such as freshwater lakes, are known to be net emitters of carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4). In recent years, significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from tropical, boreal, and mid-latitude reservoirs have been reported. At a time when hydropower is increasing worldwide, better understanding of seasonal and regional variation in GHG emissions is needed in order to develop a predictive understanding of such fluxes within man-made impoundments. We examined power-producing dam complexes within xeric temperate locations in the northwestern United States. Sampling environments on the Snake (Lower Monumental Dam Complex) and Columbia Rivers (Priest Rapids Dam Complex) included tributary, mainstem, embayment, forebay, and tailrace areas during winter and summer 2012. At each sampling location, GHG measurement pathways included surface gas flux, degassing as water passed through dams during power generation, ebullition within littoral embayments, and direct sampling of hyporheic pore-water. Measurements were also carried out in a free-flowing reach of the Columbia River to estimate unaltered conditions. Surface flux resulted in very low emissions, with reservoirs acting as a sink for CO2 (up to –262 mg m-2 d-1, which is within the range previously reported for similarly located reservoirs). Surface flux of methane remained below 1 mg CH4 m-2d-1, a value well below fluxes reported previously for temperate reservoirs. Water passing through hydroelectric projects acted as a sink for CO2 during winter and a small source during summer, with mean degassing fluxes of –117 and 4.5 t CO2 d-1, respectively. Degassing of CH4 was minimal, with mean fluxes of 3.1 × 10-6 and –5.6 × 10-4 t CH4 d-1 during winter and summer, respectively. Gas flux due to ebullition was greater in coves located within reservoirs than in coves within the free flowing Hanford Reach–and CH4 flux exceeded that of CO2. Methane emissions varied widely across sampling locations, ranging from 10.5 to 1039 mg CH4 m-2 d-1, with mean fluxes of 324 mg CH4 m-2 d-1in Lower Monumental Dam reservoir and 482 mg CH4 m-2d-1 in the Priest Rapids Dam reservoir. The magnitude of methane flux due to ebullition was unexpectedly high, and falls within the range recently reported for other temperate reservoirs around the world, further suggesting that this methane source should be considered in estimates of global greenhouse gas emissions. Methane flux from sediment pore-water within littoral embayments averaged 4.2 mg m-2 d-1 during winter and 8.1 mg m-2 d-1 during summer, with a peak flux of 19.8 mg m-2d-1 (at the same location where CH4 ebullition was also the greatest). Carbon dioxide flux from sediment pore-water averaged approximately 80 mg m-2d-1 with little difference between winter and summer. Similar to emissions from ebullition, flux from sediment pore-water was higher in reservoirs than in the free flowing reach.

  18. Assessment of Salmonids and Their Habitat Conditions in the Walla Walla River Basin within Washington, Annual Report 2002-2003.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mendel, Glen; Trump, Jeremy; Gembala, Mike

    2003-09-01

    This study began in 1998 to assess salmonid distribution, relative abundance, genetics, and the condition of salmonid habitats in the Walla Walla River basin. Stream flows in the Walla Walla Basin continue to show a general trend that begins with a sharp decline in discharge in late June, followed by low summer flows and then an increase in discharge in fall and winter. Manual stream flow measurements at Pepper bridge showed an increase in 2002 of 110-185% from July-September, over flows from 2001. This increase is apparently associated with a 2000 settlement agreement between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the irrigation districts to leave minimum flows in the river. Stream temperatures in the Walla Walla basin were similar to those in 2001. Upper montane tributaries maintained maximum summer temperatures below 65 F, while sites in mid and lower Touchet and Walla Walla rivers frequently had daily maximum temperatures well above 68 F (high enough to inhibit migration in adult and juvenile salmonids, and to sharply reduce survival of their embryos and fry). These high temperatures are possibly the most critical physiological barrier to salmonids in the Walla Walla basin, but other factors (available water, turbidity or sediment deposition, cover, lack of pools, etc.) also play a part in salmonid survival, migration, and breeding success. The increased flows in the Walla Walla, due to the 2000 settlement agreement, have not shown consistent improvements to stream temperatures. Rainbow/steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) trout represent the most common salmonid in the basin. Densities of Rainbow/steelhead in the Walla Walla River from the Washington/Oregon stateline to Mojonnier Rd. dropped slightly from 2001, but are still considerably higher than before the 2000 settlement agreement. Other salmonids including; bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), and brown trout (Salmo trutta) had low densities, and limited distribution throughout the basin. A large return of adult spring chinook to the Touchet River drainage in 2001 produced higher densities of juvenile chinook in 2002 than have been seen in recent years, especially in the Wolf Fork. The adult return in 2002 was substantially less than what was seen in 2001. Due to poor water conditions and trouble getting personnel hired, spawning surveys were limited in 2002. Surveyors found only one redd in four Walla Walla River tributaries (Cottonwood Ck., East Little Walla Walla, West Little Walla Walla, and Mill Ck.), and 59 redds in Touchet River tributaries (10 in the North Fork Touchet, 30 in the South Fork Touchet, and 19 in the Wolf Fork). Bull trout spawning surveys in the upper Touchet River tributaries found a total of 125 redds and 150 live fish (92 redds and 75 fish in the Wolf Fork, 2 redds and 1 fish in the Burnt Fork, 0 redds and 1 fish in the South Fork Touchet, 29 redds and 71 fish in the North Fork Touchet, and 2 redds and 2 fish in Lewis Ck.). A preliminary steelhead genetics analysis was completed as part of this project. Results indicate differences between naturally produced steelhead and those produced in the hatchery. There were also apparent genetic differences among the naturally produced fish from different areas of the basin. Detailed results are reported in Bumgarner et al. 2003. Recommendations for assessment activities in 2003 included: (1) continue to monitor the Walla Walla River (focusing from the stateline to McDonald Rd.), the Mill Ck system, and the Little Walla Walla System. (2) reevaluate Whiskey Ck. for abundance and distribution of salmonids, and Lewis Ck. for bull trout density and distribution. (3) select or develop a habitat survey protocol and begin to conduct habitat inventory and assessment surveys. (4) summarize bull trout data for Mill Ck, South Fork Touchet, and Lewis Ck. (5) begin to evaluate temperature and flow data to assess if the habitat conditions exist for spring chinook in the Touchet River.

  19. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Savannah River Site- May 2010

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Evaluation to determine whether the Savannah River Site is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

  20. Office of River Protection (ORP) Mission Completion Strategy

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    WIEGMAN, S.A.

    2002-02-24

    DOE's Office of River Protection (ORP) is readying itself to commence construction of a Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) that will start the process of turning Hanford tank waste into glass. The plant is state-of-the art and includes reasonable flexibility to improve operations as technology and operational understandings improve. During its 40 year design life the plant has the capability to treat half of the total volume of tank waste and reduce risk to the public by up to ninety percent. Looking beyond initial processing towards the project end state, however, it is apparent that ORP's baseline approach is part of the issue raised by the DOE Secretary when he said that $300 billion and 75 years is too costly and too long for DOE's environmental cleanups. ORP has reviewed its cost and schedule drivers and has started identifying areas where better technologies and risk-based strategies could substantially decrease its life cycle cost and schedule. Specific technologies under consideration will be discussed along with expected return on investment. ORP is totally committed to taking all steps necessary during cleanup to protect human health and the environment and to comply with appropriate regulations and commitments. But, ORP is also very conscious of the fact that the history of Hanford production and tank farm operations has resulted in very large tank-to-tank variabilities in the waste constituents. Not all tank wastes demand the same high level of rigor in treatment as provided by the WTP in order to protect people and the environment. Parallel treatment paths, keyed to the hazards and chemical challenges each tank presents, need to be developed. The WTP vitrification capabilities should be deployed for the higher risk wastes that require vitrification. By getting wastes in the proper paths for treatment based upon their chemical characteristics and inherent risks, ORP will be able to both accelerate the cleanup schedule and bring its life cycle and annual funding requirements into line. The WTP needs to be managed and its throughput enhanced to vitrify all of the HLW and approximately 50% of the low-level tank waste by about 2030. That represents the lion's share of the current and long-term risk presented by the tanks. For much of the low activity waste currently in the tanks, parallel treatment technologies are required that protect people and the environment but require less time and less cost than the total vitrification option presents. Any such technologies that ORP deploys must have sound, defensible bases with the prerequisite QA pedigrees. Providing parallel paths for lower risk wastes will allow ORP to avoid the 20-30 year treatment schedule that lower risk tanks would otherwise face. Potential parallel paths will be described. ORP also needs to deploy and test technologies to demonstrate that its tank farms can be successfully closed. Starting such a demonstration during the period while the plant is under construction will allow ORP to start developing critical data that it will need for permanent closures at a later date. It will take many years of testing such demonstration activities and monitoring to develop confidence in tank closure approaches. If ORP starts such an effort, practicing on smaller, more benign tanks, it will reap significant institutional benefits in the near-term and have far better information when it is ready to start to close entire tank farms in the future.

  1. Independent Activity Report, Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms- February 2013

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Site Familiarization and Introduction of New Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Site Lead for the Office of River Protection Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farms [HIAR-HANFORD-2013-02-25

  2. Savannah River Site Team Wins Carolina Challenge at 2012 DOE Security Protection Officer Competition

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Savannah River Site, Aiken, S.C. – Security Protection Officers from Savannah River Site’s (SRS) security contractor WSI-SRS, today won the Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary’s Trophy as the top DOE team in the 2012 Security Protection Officer Team Competition (SPOTC)- 2012 Carolina Challenge, held here, April 22-26. It was the 40th anniversary of the SPOTC competition.

  3. Office of River Protection Looks Back on 2014 Achievements, Including Tank

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Retrieval Progress | Department of Energy Office of River Protection Looks Back on 2014 Achievements, Including Tank Retrieval Progress Office of River Protection Looks Back on 2014 Achievements, Including Tank Retrieval Progress December 23, 2014 - 12:00pm Addthis Since its construction in the mid-1970s, the 242-A Evaporator has removed nearly 68 million gallons of water from tank waste, which reduces the volume stored in the double-shell tanks to make room for waste retrieval from

  4. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Evaluation to determine whether River Corridor Closure Project is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition. The Team conducted its review during June 11...

  5. Field Summary Report for Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River, Hanford Site, Washington, Collection of Surface Water, River Sediments, and Island Soils

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    L. C. Hulstrom

    2009-09-28

    This report has been prepared in support of the remedial investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River and describes the 2008/2009 data collection efforts. This report documents field activities associated with collection of sediment, river water, and soil in and adjacent to the Columbia River near the Hanford Site and in nearby tributaries.

  6. Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Progresses at the Office of River Protection Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The concrete “core” is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. The concrete "core" is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. A composite image of dozens of individual-frame photos taken inside Tank C-110 provides a rare panoramic view of its interior. Portions of the tank

  7. Savannah River Site Environmental Implementation Plan. Volume 2, Protection programs

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1989-08-01

    Formal sitewide environmental planning at the . Savannah River Site (SRS) began in 1986 with the development and adoption of the Strategic Environmental Plan. The Strategic Environmental Plan describes the philosophy, policy, and overall program direction of environmental programs for the operation of the SRS. The Strategic Environmental Plan (Volume 2) provided the basis for development of the Environmental Implementation Plan (EIP). The EIP is the detailed, comprehensive environmental master plan for operating contractor organizations at the SRS. The EIP provides a process to ensure that all environmental requirements and obligations are being met by setting specific measurable goals and objectives and strategies for implementation. The plan is the basis for justification of site manpower and funding requests for environmental projects and programs over a five-year planning period.

  8. CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Environment, Safety and Health program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System.

  9. CRAD, Training- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Environment, Safety and Health program at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System.

  10. CRAD, Management- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Management at the Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System.

  11. EIS-0120: Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection, Savannah River Plant, Aiken, South Carolina

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy has prepared this environmental impact statement to assess the environmental consequences of the implementation of modified waste management activities for hazardous, low-level radioactive, and mixed wastes for the protection of groundwater, human health, and the environment at its Savannah River Plant in Aiken, South Carolina.

  12. CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Office of River Protection, K Basin Sludge Waste System.

  13. EIS-0120: Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection, Savannah River Plant, Aiken, SC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy has prepared this environmental impact statement to assess the environmental consequences of the implementation of modified waste management activities for hazardous, low-level radioactive, and mixed wastes for the protection of groundwater, human health, and the environment at its Savannah River Plant in Aiken, South Carolina.

  14. Field Summary Report for Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River, Hanford Site, Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    L.C. Hulstrom

    2010-08-11

    This report summarizes field sampling activities conducted in support of WCH’s Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River. This work was conducted form 2008 through 2010. The work included preliminary mapping and measurement of Hanford Site contaminants in sediment, pore water, and surface water located in areas where groundwater upwelling were found.

  15. Office of River Protection Advanced Low-Activity Waste Glass Research and Development Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kruger, A. A.; Peeler, D. K.; Kim, D. S.; Vienna, J. D.; Piepel, G. F.; Schweiger, M. J.

    2015-11-23

    The U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection (ORP) has initiated and leads an integrated Advanced Waste Glass (AWG) program to increase the loading of Hanford tank wastes in glass while meeting melter lifetime expectancies and process, regulatory, and product performance requirements. The integrated ORP program is focused on providing a technical, science-based foundation for making key decisions regarding the successful operation of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) facilities in the context of an optimized River Protection Project (RPP) flowsheet. The fundamental data stemming from this program will support development of advanced glass formulations, key product performance and process control models, and tactical processing strategies to ensure safe and successful operations for both the low-activity waste (LAW) and high-level waste vitrification facilities. These activities will be conducted with the objective of improving the overall RPP mission by enhancing flexibility and reducing cost and schedule.

  16. Microsoft PowerPoint - River Protection Project HAB.ppt [Read-Only]

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    River Protection Project Waste Treatment & Disposition January 2009 1 2 Insights From External Review Analyses * No need to make LAW ST decision now: make in 2015 - 2017 once Na/Al uncertainties reduced, M-2/M-3 Pretreatment issues resolved, and improved overall integrated RPP system understanding in place (e.g., System Plan 4) * WTP LAW Facility alone cannot complete LAW immobilization mission in same timeframe as HLW mission even with 3 rd melter or higher capacity melters. Third melter

  17. River Protection Project Integrated safety management system phase II verification review plan - 7/29/99

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    SHOOP, D.S.

    1999-09-10

    The purpose of this review is to verify the implementation status of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) for the River Protection Project (RPP) facilities managed by Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. (FDH) and operated by Lockheed Martin Hanford Company (LMHC). This review will also ascertain whether within RPP facilities and operations the work planning and execution processes are in place and functioning to effectively protect the health and safety of the workers, public, environment, and federal property over the RPP life cycle. The RPP ISMS should support the Hanford Strategic Plan (DOERL-96-92) to safely clean up and manage the site's legacy waste and deploy science and technology while incorporating the ISMS central theme to ''Do work safely'' and protect human health and the environment.

  18. SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

    2006-12-20

    Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

  19. Metropolitan Washington

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments A White House Climate Action Champions Case Study INDEX Executive Summary...............................2 Climate Action Champion.....................2 Project Spotlight.................................3-5 Co-benefits.............................................5 Challenges and Lessons Learned.........5 Resources and Contacts........................7 2 Executive Summary The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) is an independent,

  20. Grouting project to protect Snake River Plain Aquifer completed ahead of

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    schedule DOE Awards Small Business Contracts for Recovery Act Cleanup Work at DOE�s Idaho Site September 29, 2010 Media contact: Erik Simpson (208) 360-0426 Idaho Falls, ID � The Idaho Cleanup Project safely completed a remedial action five weeks ahead of schedule that protects the Snake River Plain Aquifer by grouting buried waste at the U.S. Department of Energy�s (DOE) Idaho Site. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funded the project. Project contractor Hayward Baker, Inc.,

  1. Seeking to calm troubled waters: The Missisquoi River Keepers Project and the development of a community-based river protection program

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Peterson, D.M.; Delaney, M.; Dickens, S.P.

    1995-12-01

    The Missisquoi River, in northwestern Vermont and southern Quebec, has become the focus of efforts to develop local community-based means to address environmental and cultural concerns affecting the region`s Native and non-Native peoples. The River flows through historical Abenaki territory, and is relied upon by tribal members for subsistence, cultural, and spiritual purposes. The River has been in a controversy involving aboriginal fishing and sovereignty rights, hydroelectric development, transboundary pollution problems, protection of Native cultural and historical sites, state resource management practices, and formal federal/state recognition of the Abenaki nation. The Missisquoi River Keepers Project is a cooperative program initiated by the Abenaki in 1993 to protect the River and its watershed by uniting often adversarial Native and non-Native communities in the region. This paper discusses how ecological monitoring, environmental and cultural education, community organizing, and outreach to federal, state and local officials are being utilized to identify the watershed`s problems and to resolve conflicts. The Project is working with different interest groups to develop consensus and to find creative means to reverse the degradation of the watershed. The Project has also provided legal and technical support in reviewing environmental permits, rule-making, and enforcement of federal, state and local statutes and regulations. The Project may serve as a useful model forlocal management of watershed protection programs.

  2. Kootenai River Floodplain Ecosystem Operational Loss Assessment, Protection, Mitigation and Rehabilitation, 2007-2008 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Merz, Norm

    2009-02-18

    The overarching goals of the 'Kootenai River Floodplain Ecosystem Operational Loss Assessment, Protection, Mitigation and Rehabilitation' Project (BPA Project No.2002-011-00) are to: (1) assess abiotic and biotic factors (i.e., geomorphologic, hydrological, aquatic and riparian/floodplain communities) in determining a definitive composition of ecological integrity, (2) develop strategies to assess and mitigate losses of ecosystem functions, and (3) produce a regional operational loss assessment framework. To produce a scientifically defensible, repeatable, and complete assessment tool, KTOI assembled a team of top scientists in the fields of hydrology, hydraulics, ornithology, entomology, statistics, and river ecology, among other expertise. This advisory team is known as the Research Design and Review Team (RDRT). The RDRT scientists drive the review, selection, and adaptive management of the research designs to evaluate the ecologic functions lost due to the operation of federal hydropower facilities. The unique nature of this project (scientific team, newest/best science, adaptive management, assessment of ecological functions, etc.) has been to work in a dynamic RDRT process. In addition to being multidisciplinary, this model KTOI project provides a stark contrast to the sometimes inflexible process (review, re-review, budgets, etc.) of the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. The project RDRT is assembled annually, with subgroups meeting as needed throughout the year to address project issues, analyses, review, and interpretation. Activities of RDRT coordinated and directed the selection of research and assessment methodologies appropriate for the Kootenai River Watershed and potential for regional application in the Columbia River Basin. The entire RDRT continues to meet annually to update and discuss project progress. RDRT Subcontractors work in smaller groups throughout the year to meet project objectives. Determining the extent to which ecological systems are experiencing anthropogenic disturbance and change in structure and function is critical for long term conservation of biotic diversity in the face of changing landscapes and land use. KTOI and the RDRT propose a concept based on incorporating hydrologic, aquatic, and terrestrial components into an operations-based assessment framework to assess ecological losses as shown in Figure E-1.

  3. Independent Oversight Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Quality and Fire Protection Systems, April 2014

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Quality and Fire Protection Systems April 2014 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background...

  4. Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need to Operate...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Need to Operate Mirant's Potomac River Generation Station to Support Local Area Reliability (Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2005) Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need ...

  5. Snohomish County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Echo Lake, Washington Edmonds, Washington Esperance, Washington Everett, Washington Gold Bar, Washington Granite Falls, Washington Index, Washington John Sam Lake, Washington...

  6. Office of River Protection Advanced Low-Activity Waste Glass Research and Development Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Peeler, David K.; Kim, Dong-Sang; Vienna, John D.; Schweiger, Michael J.; Piepel, Gregory F.

    2015-11-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection (ORP) has initiated and leads an integrated Advanced Waste Glass (AWG) program to increase the loading of Hanford tank wastes in glass while meeting melter lifetime expectancies and process, regulatory, and product performance requirements. The integrated ORP program is focused on providing a technical, science-based foundation for making key decisions regarding the successful operation of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) facilities in the context of an optimized River Protection Project (RPP) flowsheet. The fundamental data stemming from this program will support development of advanced glass formulations, key product performance and process control models, and tactical processing strategies to ensure safe and successful operations for both the low-activity waste (LAW) and high-level waste vitrification facilities. These activities will be conducted with the objective of improving the overall RPP mission by enhancing flexibility and reducing cost and schedule. The purpose of this advanced LAW glass research and development plan is to identify the near-term, mid-term, and longer-term research and development activities required to develop and validate advanced LAW glasses, property-composition models and their uncertainties, and an advanced glass algorithm to support WTP facility operations, including both Direct Feed LAW and full pretreatment flowsheets. Data are needed to develop, validate, and implement 1) new glass property-composition models and 2) a new glass formulation algorithm. Hence, this plan integrates specific studies associated with increasing the Na2O and SO3/halide concentrations in glass, because these components will ultimately dictate waste loadings for LAW vitrification. Of equal importance is the development of an efficient and economic strategy for 99Tc management. Specific and detailed studies are being implemented to understand the fate of Tc throughout the WTP flowsheet and the underlying mechanisms that dictate its partitioning between streams within the LAW vitrification facility. These studies are aimed at increasing the single-pass Tc retention in glass and the potential use of high-temperature mineral phases to capture Tc. The Tc-bearing mineral phases would be thermally stable and resistant to Tc release during feed melting reactions or they could serve as alternative waste forms. The LAW glass research and development is focused on reducing the total volume of LAW glass produced and minimizing the impact of (or potentially eliminating) the need for recycle.

  7. Washington Update

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Federal Energy Management Program Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update Dr. Timothy Unruh October 25-26, 2011 Philadelphia, PA 2 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview  Federal Government Goals and Status  FEMP Update  UESC Program Overview and Goals  Mark Your Calendar: Spring 2012 FUPWG 3 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov FEMP's Mission FEMP provides the services, tools, and expertise to Federal

  8. Walla Walla County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Burbank, Washington College Place, Washington Dixie, Washington Garrett, Washington Prescott, Washington Touchet, Washington Waitsburg, Washington Walla Walla East, Washington...

  9. Clark County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Meadow Glade, Washington Mill Plain, Washington Minnehaha, Washington Mount Vista, Washington Orchards, Washington Ridgefield, Washington Salmon Creek, Washington...

  10. Skagit County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    View, Washington Big Lake, Washington Burlington, Washington Clear Lake, Washington Concrete, Washington Conway, Washington Edison, Washington Hamilton, Washington La Conner,...

  11. Whatcom County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Bellingham, Washington Birch Bay, Washington Blaine, Washington Custer, Washington Deming, Washington Everson, Washington Ferndale, Washington Geneva, Washington Glacier,...

  12. Pacific County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Bay Center, Washington Chinook, Washington Ilwaco, Washington Lebam, Washington Long Beach, Washington Naselle, Washington Ocean Park, Washington Raymond, Washington...

  13. Thurston County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Olympia, Washington Rainier, Washington Rochester, Washington Tanglewilde-Thompson Place, Washington Tenino, Washington Tumwater, Washington Yelm, Washington Retrieved...

  14. Washington Update

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FUPWG: Washington Update November 5, 2014 Timothy D. Unruh PhD, PE, CEM Program Manager DOE FEMP 2 Agenda  Mission  FEMP's Role  White House Capital Solar Challenge  President's Performance Contracting Challenge  UESC  IDIQ Re-compete  eProject Builder- UESC Inclusion  ENABLE- UESC Inclusion  Operations and Maintenance  FEEF Awards-include next award technology  Energy Exchange  Fossil Fuel Rule: SNOPR  Vision for PBC of the Future  Questions 3 Mission

  15. Washington, DC'

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    of. Energy Washington, DC' 26585 , The Honorable Gene Eriquez .~ City Hall I55 Deer Hill Avenue + Danbury/Connecticut 06180 .. -r. - Dear Mayor Eriquez: Secretary of Energy Hazel O!Leary has .announced a knew approach -to openness in. the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications with the public. In support of th,is initiative, we are,pleased to forward the enclosed information, related to the former Sperry Products,'.Inc. site in your jurisdiction ,that performed,work for DOE or its

  16. Department Washington,

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Washington, of Energy DC 20545 Mr. Roy J. Villella, Jr. Assistant Secretary Diebold, Incorporated 818 Mulberry Road, S.E. F. 0. Box 8230 Canton, Ohio 44711-8230 Dear Mr..Villella: Enclosed is your copy of the signed consent form for the survey of those portions of the Diebold property used by the former owner, Herring Hall and Marvin Safe Company, to machine uranium rod for the Manhattan Engineer District. I have directed our contractor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to coordinate the

  17. Health protection at the Savannah River Site: A guide to records series of the Department of Energy and its contractors

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-09-01

    As part of the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Epidemiologic Records Inventory Project, History Associates Incorporated (HAI) prepared this guide to the records series pertaining to health protection activities at the DOE`s Savannah River Site (SRS). Since its inception in the early 1950s, the SRS, formerly known as the Savannah River Plant (SRP), has demonstrated significant interest in safeguarding facilities, protecting employees` health, and monitoring the environment. The guide describes records that concern health protection program administration, radiological monitoring of the plant and the environment, calibration and maintenance of monitoring instruments, internal and external dosimetry practices, medical surveillance of employees, occupational safety and training measures, site visitation, and electronic information systems. The introduction to the guide describes the Epidemiologic Records Inventory Project and HAI`s role in the project. It provides brief histories of the DOE, SRS, and the SRS organizational units responsible for health protection activities. This introduction also summarizes HAI`s methodology in developing criteria and conducting its verification of the SRS inventory of active and inactive SRS Health Protection records. Furthermore, it furnishes information on the production of the guide, the content of the records series descriptions, the location of the records, and the procedures for accessing records repositories.

  18. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite, Liquid Waste Contract Savannah River Site- February 2011

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Evaluation to determine whether the Liquid Waste Contract Savannah River Site is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

  19. The Department of Energy remains committed to protecting workers, the public and

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    remains committed to protecting workers, the public and the environment. Minimizing risks to workers, including chemical vapors in the tank farms, is something the Department and its contractors strive for each day at Hanford. Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) developed a plan to address the recommendations of the independent Tank Vapors Assessment Team in two phases, with the second phase being highly dependent on the outcome of the first phase activities. The Office of River

  20. Washington DC Reliability Requirements and the Need to Operate Mirant’s Potomac River Generation Station to Support Local Area Reliability (Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2005)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pursuant to Docket No. EO-05-01: Oak Ridge National Laboratory provided an analysis of the Mirant Potomac River Generation Station in 2005 and discussed the reliability requirements of the local...

  1. EIS-0419: Whistling Ridge Energy Project; Skamania County, Washington |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy 9: Whistling Ridge Energy Project; Skamania County, Washington EIS-0419: Whistling Ridge Energy Project; Skamania County, Washington Summary DOE's Bonneville Power Administration prepared an EIS that evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to allow the electrical interconnection of a proposed 75-megawatt wind project in Skamania County, Washington, to the Federal Columbia River Transmission System. The Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation

  2. Washington: Washington's Clean Energy Resources and Economy

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2013-03-25

    This document highlights the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's investments and impacts in the state of Washington.

  3. Protect and Restore Red River Watershed, 2007-2008 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bransford, Stephanie

    2009-05-04

    The Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resource Management, Watershed Division approaches watershed restoration with a ridge-top to ridge-top approach. The Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) and the Nez Perce National Forest (NPNF) have formed a partnership in completing watershed restoration activities, and through this partnership more work is accomplished by sharing funding and resources in our effort. The Nez Perce Tribe began watershed restoration projects within the Red River Watershed of the South Fork Clearwater River in 2001. Progress has been made in restoring the watershed through road decommissioning and culvert replacement. From completing a watershed assessment to two NEPA efforts and a final stream restoration design, we will begin the effort of restoring the mainstem channel of Red River to provide spawning and rearing habitat for anadromous and resident fish species. Roads have been surveyed and prioritized for removal or improvement as well as culverts being prioritized for replacement to accommodate fish passage throughout the watershed. Another major, and extremely, important component of this project is the Red River Meadow Conservation Easement. We have begun the process of pursuing a conservation easement on approximately 270 acres of prime meadow habitat (Red River runs through this meadow and is prime spawning and rearing habitat).

  4. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Tank Farm Operations Contract -

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    November 2010 | Department of Energy Tank Farm Operations Contract - November 2010 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Tank Farm Operations Contract - November 2010 November 2010 Evaluation to determine whether the Tank Farm Operations Contract is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition. The Team conducted its review during November 1 - 11, 2010 to determine whether Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC is continuing to perform at a level deserving

  5. Geothermal Technologies Program - Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2005-02-01

    This fact sheets provides a summary of geothermal potential, issues, and current development in Washington State.

  6. Jefferson County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    C. Places in Jefferson County, Washington Brinnon, Washington Marrowstone, Washington Port Hadlock-Irondale, Washington Port Ludlow, Washington Port Townsend, Washington...

  7. Fiscal Year 2006 Washington Closure Hanford Science & Technology Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    K.J. Kroegler, M. Truex, D.J. McBride

    2006-01-19

    This Washington Closure Hanford science and technology (S&T) plan documents the activities associated with providing S&T support to the River Corridor Closure Project for fiscal year 2006.

  8. Institute Recognizes Washington Closure Hanford as International Award

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Finalist | Department of Energy Institute Recognizes Washington Closure Hanford as International Award Finalist Institute Recognizes Washington Closure Hanford as International Award Finalist December 17, 2015 - 12:05pm Addthis RICHLAND, Wash. - The Project Management Institute (PMI) honored Hanford Site contractor Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) as a finalist for the international Project of the Year Award. WCH and the River Corridor team were recognized for their cleanup progress in this

  9. Asotin Creek Model Watershed Plan: Asotin County, Washington, 1995.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Browne, Dave

    1995-04-01

    The Northwest Power Planning Council completed its ``Strategy for Salmon'' in 1992. This is a plan, composed of four specific elements,designed to double the present production of 2.5 million salmon in the Columbia River watershed. These elements have been called the ``four H's'': (1) improve harvest management; (2) improve hatcheries and their production practices; (3) improve survival at hydroelectric dams; and (4) improve and protect fish habitat. The Asotin Creek Model Watershed Plan is the first to be developed in Washington State which is specifically concerned with habitat protection and restoration for salmon and trout. The plan is consistent with the habitat element of the ``Strategy for Salmon''. Asotin Creek is similar in many ways to other salmon-bearing streams in the Snake River system. Its watershed has been significantly impacted by human activities and catastrophic natural events, such as floods and droughts. It supports only remnant salmon and trout populations compared to earlier years. It will require protection and restoration of its fish habitat and riparian corridor in order to increase its salmonid productivity.

  10. Kitsap County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Island, Washington Bangor Trident Base, Washington Bremerton, Washington East Port Orchard, Washington Erlands Point-Kitsap Lake, Washington Indianola, Washington...

  11. Grays Harbor County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Grays Harbor County, Washington Aberdeen Gardens, Washington Aberdeen, Washington Brady, Washington Central Park, Washington Chehalis Village, Washington Cohassett Beach,...

  12. Washington Biodiesel | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Logo: Washington Biodiesel Name: Washington Biodiesel Address: 3401 Fremont Avenue N. Place: Seattle, Washington Zip: 98103 Region: Pacific Northwest Area Sector: Biofuels...

  13. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CITES WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR RADIATION

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY VIOLATIONS September 1, 2011 - 4:07pm WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy has issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Washington Group International, Inc. (WGI) for a September 2010 incident that violated the Department's radiation protection and nuclear safety regulations, and has proposed a $412,500 civil penalty. The violations are associated with a radiological contamination incident that

  14. Enterprise Assessments Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Quality and Fire Protection Systems Follow-up Review at the Savannah River Site Â… January 2016

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Quality and Fire Protection Systems Follow-up Review at the Savannah River Site January 2016 Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments Office of Environment, Safety and Health Assessments Office of Enterprise Assessments U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... ii Executive

  15. River Protection Project Integrated safety management system phase II verification report, volumes I and II - 8/19/99

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    SHOOP, D.S.

    1999-09-10

    The Department of Energy policy (DOE P 450.4) is that safety is integrated into all aspects of the management and operations of its facilities. In simple and straightforward terms, the Department will ''Do work safely.'' The purpose of this River Protection Project (RPP) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Phase II Verification was to determine whether ISMS programs and processes are implemented within RFP to accomplish the goal of ''Do work safely.'' The goal of an implemented ISMS is to have a single integrated system that includes Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) requirements in the work planning and execution processes to ensure the protection of the worker, public, environment, and federal property over the RPP life cycle. The ISMS is comprised of the (1) described functions, components, processes, and interfaces (system map or blueprint) and (2) personnel who are executing those assigned roles and responsibilities to manage and control the ISMS. Therefore, this review evaluated both the ''paper'' and ''people'' aspects of the ISMS to ensure that the system is implemented within RPP. Richland Operations Office (RL) conducted an ISMS Phase I Verification of the TWRS from September 28-October 9, 1998. The resulting verification report recommended that TWRS-RL and the contractor proceed with Phase II of ISMS verification given that the concerns identified from the Phase I verification review are incorporated into the Phase II implementation plan.

  16. EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts from DOE’s Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to assist with funding the construction, operation, and maintenance of modifications to the Klickitat Hatchery and the Yakama Nation’s Hatchery Complex Program that intend to aid populations of anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams. The proposed action could include support for modifications to the existing hatchery, a new hatchery/acclimation facility in Wahkiacus, Washington, and an acclimation facility at McCreedy Creek in Yakima County, Washington.

  17. Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) Hanford Tank Waste Treatment Alternatives March 2000

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    WODRICH, D.D.

    2000-03-24

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently planning to retrieve, pretreat, immobilize and safely dispose of 53 million gallons of highly radioactive waste currently stored in underground tanks at Hanford Site. The DOE plan is a two-phased approach to privatizing the processing of hazardous and radioactive waste. Phase 1 is a proof-of-concept/commercial demonstration-scale effort whose objectives are to: demonstrate, the technical and business viability of using privatized facilities to treat Hanford tank waste; define and maintain required levels of radiological, nuclear, process and occupational safety; maintain environmental protection and compliance; and substantially reduce life-cycle costs and time required to treat Hanford tank waste. The Phase 1 effort consists of Part A and Part B. On September 25, 1996 (Reference 1), DOE signed a contract with BNFL, Inc. (BNFL) to commence with Phase 1, Part A. In August 1998, BNFL was authorized to proceed with Phase I, Part 6-1, a 24-month design phase that will-provide sufficient engineering and financial maturity to establish fixed-unit prices and financing terms for tank waste processing services in privately-owned and -operated facilities. By August 2000, DOE will decide whether to authorize BNFL to proceed with construction and operation of the proposed processing facilities, or pursue a different path. To support of the decision, DOE is evaluating alternatives to potentially enhance the BNFL tank waste processing contract, as well as, developing an alternate path forward should DOE decide to not continue the BNFL contract. The decision on whether to continue with the current privatization strategy (BNFL contract) or to pursue an alternate can not be made until the evaluation process leading up to the decision on whether to authorize BNFL to proceed with construction and operation (known as the Part 8-2 decision) is completed. The evaluation process includes reviewing and evaluating the information BNFL is scheduled to submit in April 2000, and negotiating the best mutually acceptable contract terms. The alternatives studies completed to-date are summarized in Reference 2.

  18. Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects : Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    United States. Bonneville Power Administration; Washington . Dept. of Fish and Wildlife.

    1996-08-01

    Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) proposes to fund the portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement (Agreement) pertaining to wildlife habitat mitigation projects to be undertaken in a cooperative effort with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). This Agreement serves to establish a monetary budget funded by BPA for projects proposed by Washington Wildlife Coalition members and approved by BPA to protect, mitigate, and improve wildlife and/or wildlife habitat within the State of Washington that has been affected by the construction of Federal dams along the Columbia River. This Environmental Assessment examines the potential environmental effects of acquiring and/or improving wildlife habitat within five different project areas. These project areas are located throughout Grant County and in parts of Okanogan, Douglas, Adams, Franklin, Kittias, Yakima, and Benton Counties. The multiple projects would involve varying combinations of five proposed site-specific activities (habitat improvement, operation and maintenance, monitoring and evaluation, access and recreation management, and cultural resource management). All required Federal, State, and tribal coordination, permits and/or approvals would be obtained prior to ground-disturbing activities.

  19. Grant County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Banks Lake South, Washington Cascade Valley, Washington Coulee City, Washington Coulee Dam, Washington Desert Aire, Washington Electric City, Washington Ephrata, Washington...

  20. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Fluor Federal Services...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Richland, Washington - June 2011 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Richland, Washington - June 2011 June 2011 ...

  1. EM Sites Honored for Bird Protection Practices

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – A federal council recently recognized two EM sites for efforts to protect migratory birds.

  2. Contractors Cleaned Up Most of Hanford Site's River Corridor, But Work Remains

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – Washington Closure Hanford and previous contractors have completed much of the cleanup work in the River Corridor.

  3. Seattle, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Institutions in Seattle, Washington ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center Washington Technology Center Registered Networking...

  4. River Corridor Achievements | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Achievements River Corridor Achievements December 17, 2015 - 12:15pm Addthis Overall-RC-achievements_2015nw_756px - Copy.jpg Washington Closure Hanford and previous contractors have completed much of the cleanup work in the River Corridor, shown here. Addthis Related Articles EM Update Newsletter Spotlights River Corridor Cleanup at Hanford Site Washington Closure Hanford: Ten Years of River Corridor Cleanup The inset photo shows Hanford's 300 Area in 1982 in comparison to the area today, shown

  5. Lower Columbia River Terminal Fisheries Research Project : Final Environmental Assessment.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

    1995-04-01

    This notice announces BPA`S`s decision to fund the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and the Clatsop Economic Development Committee for the Lower Columbia River Terminal Fisheries Research Project (Project). The Project will continue the testing of various species/stocks, rearing regimes, and harvest options for terminal fisheries, as a means to increase lower river sport and commercial harvest of hatchery fish, while providing both greater protection of weaker wild stocks and increasing the return of upriver salmon runs to potential Zone 6 Treaty fisheries. The Project involves relocating hatchery smolts to new, additional pen locations in three bays/sloughs in the lower Columbia River along both the Oregon and Washington sides. The sites are Blind Slough and Tongue Point in Clatsop County, Oregon, and Grays Bay/Deep River, Wahkiakum County, Washington. The smolts will be acclimated for various lengths of time in the net pens and released from these sites. The Project will expand upon an existing terminal fisheries project in Youngs Bay, Oregon. The Project may be expanded to other sites in the future, depending on the results of this initial expansion. BPA`S has determined the project is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required, and BPA`S is issuing this FONSI.

  6. George Washington Carver Recognition Day

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    In commemoration of George Washington Carver’s life and work, Congress declared January 5 as George Washington Carver Recognition Day.

  7. Itron (Washington) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name: Itron Address: 601 Officers Row Place: Vancouver, Washington Zip: 98661 Region: Pacific Northwest Area Sector: Efficiency Product:...

  8. Office of River Protection

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  9. STATE OF WASHINGTON August

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    STATE OF WASHINGTON August 29, 2012 The Honorable Stephen Chu, Secretary United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue Washington, DC 20585 Dear Secretary Chu: As you know, we reached a significant agreement on the parameters for Hanford cleanup in a Consent Decree signed in federal court in October 2010. In November 2011,just 13 months later, DOE informed us that a number of unspecified Consent Decree requirements were at risk. Nearly six more months passed before DOE provided the

  10. Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    December 2014 The U.S. Department of Energy is responsible for one of the largest nuclear cleanup efforts in the world, managing the legacy of five decades of nuclear weapons production. At its peak, this national weapons complex consisted of 16 major facilities, including vast reservations of land in the States of Idaho, Nevada, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington. Nowhere in the DOE Complex is cleanup more challenging than at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington. Hanford made more

  11. Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    May 2015 The U.S. Department of Energy is responsible for one of the largest nuclear cleanup efforts in the world, managing the legacy of five decades of nuclear weapons production. At its peak, this national weapons complex consisted of 16 major facilities, including vast reservations of land in the States of Idaho, Nevada, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington. Nowhere in the DOE Complex is cleanup more challenging than at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington. Hanford made more than

  12. EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy 4: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts from DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to assist with funding the construction, operation, and maintenance of modifications to the Klickitat Hatchery and the Yakama Nation's Hatchery Complex Program that intend to aid populations of anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams. The

  13. EIS-0425: Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of DOE’s Bonneville Power Administration’s proposal to fund the construction, operation, and maintenance of a coho salmon restoration program sponsored by the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation to help mitigate impacts to fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams on the Columbia River. The Proposed Action would involve building a new, small, in-basin adult holding/spawning, incubation and rearing facility on the Wenatchee River at one of two potential sites; and constructing and improving several sites in both the Wenatchee and Methow river basins in north central Washington State.

  14. Audit Report on Management Controls over the Use of Service Contracts at the Office of River Protection

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    None

    2009-04-01

    The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of River Protection (ORP) is responsible for the storage, treatment, and disposal of over 53 million gallons of highly radioactive waste from over 40 years of plutonium production at the Hanford Site. Because of the diversity, complexity, and large scope of its mission, coupled with its small staff, ORP told us that it has found it necessary to engage in service contracts to obtain consulting services, technical expertise, and support staff. Federal policy generally permits contractors to perform a wide range of support service activities, including, in most situations, the drafting of Government documents subject to the review and approval of Federal employees. Federal policy issued by the Office of Management and Budget, however, prohibits contractors from drafting agency responses to Congressional inquiries and reports issued by the Office of Inspector General and Government Accountability Office (GAO) because they are so closely related to the public interest and provide the appearance of private influence. To provide a majority of its needed services, ORP issued a Blanket Purchase Agreement to Project Assistance Corporation (PAC) in 2003. Through the Blanket Purchase Agreement, ORP acquired services in the areas of project management, risk assessment, program assessment, quality assurance, safety, cost and schedule estimating, budgeting and finance, and engineering. PAC has, in turn, subcontracted with various other firms to obtain some of the services needed by ORP. From 2005 to 2008, the total annual cost for the contract with PAC had grown from $4.7 million to $9.2 million. Because of the extent of the services provided and growing costs of the contract, we conducted this review to determine whether ORP appropriately administered its contract with the Project Assistance Corporation. Our review disclosed that, in some instances, ORP had not appropriately administered all work performed under the PAC contract. Specifically, ORP allowed PAC employees to perform work that was inherently governmental and created situations where a potential conflict of interest occurred. Specifically: (1) ORP assigned PAC employees responsibility for providing information and responses to Congressional inquiries and reports issued by the GAO and the Department of Energy's Office of Inspector General (OIG); and (2) PAC employees were also allowed to perform functions that created potential conflicts of interest. ORP permitted PAC employees, for example, to develop statements of work and approve funding of work to be performed under PAC's own contract. We concluded that these problems occurred, at least in part, because ORP had not established controls necessary to effectively administer the PAC contract. Federal procurement regulations recommended that agencies provide additional management controls over contractors whose work has the potential to influence the action of government officials. ORP, however, had not implemented the controls specifically recommended in Federal policy guidance for administering contracts, including: (1) Performing conflict of interest reviews; and (2) Separating contractor and Department employees either physically or organizationally. By not effectively administering its contract with PAC, ORP increased the risk that decisions based on work performed by the contractor may not have been made in the best interests of the Department. For example, ORP increased the risk that approved work would be unnecessary or too costly. As we also recently noted in our report on 'Management Challenges at the Department of Energy' (DOE/IG-0808, December 2008), contract administration issues such as those discussed in this report remain a significant vulnerability. Continued efforts to improve this area are vitally important since the risk that contractors receive payments for unallowable costs could also increase as the Department expands its contracting activities under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. To its credit, however, ORP has recognized that there are weakn

  15. Incentive Fee Determination Summary Contractor: Washington Closure Hanford LLC

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Incentive Fee Determination Summary Contractor: Washington Closure Hanford LLC Contract: River Corridor Closure Contract Line Item Number One (CLIN 1) Schedule Performance Incentive Fee (SPIF) Contract Number: DE-AC06-05RL14655 Award Fee Available: $32,800,000 Award Fee Earned: $31,200,000 Basis of Evaluation: Completion of CLIN 1 incentivized scope identified in Section J, Attachment J-1, River Corridor Closure Contract Work Scope, according to the schedule set forth in Section B, Table B.1

  16. Salt River Electric- Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Salt River Electric serves as the rural electric provider in Kentucky's Bullitt, Nelson, Spencer, and Washington counties. Residential customers are eligible for a variety of cash incentives for...

  17. Washington: Washington's Clean Energy Resources and Economy (Brochure)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2013-03-01

    This document highlights the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's investments and impacts in the state of Washington.

  18. Poly 3D fault modeling scripts/data for permeability potential of Washington State geothermal prospects

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Michael Swyer

    2015-02-05

    Matlab scripts/functions and data used to build Poly3D models and create permeability potential GIS layers for 1) Mount St Helen's, 2) Wind River Valley, and 3) Mount Baker geothermal prospect areas located in Washington state.

  19. University of Washington | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Jump to: navigation, search Name: University of Washington Place: Seattle, Washington Product: Public research university with campuses in Seattle, Tacoma, and Bothell....

  20. The George Washington University | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington University Jump to: navigation, search Name: The George Washington University Place: Washington, District of Columbia Zip: 20052 Website: www.gwu.edu Coordinates:...

  1. Washington Technology Center | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Logo: Washington Technology Center Name: Washington Technology Center Address: 300 Fluke Hall Place: Seattle, Washington Zip: 98195 Region: Pacific Northwest Area Website:...

  2. Fermilab Today | University of Washington Profile

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Washington August 27, 2009 NAME: University of Washington HOME TOWN: Seattle, Washington MASCOT: Husky SCHOOL COLORS: Purple and gold PARTICLE PHYSICS COLLABORATIONS: DZero and...

  3. Good Energies (Washington DC) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Good Energies (Washington DC) Name: Good Energies (Washington DC) Address: 1250 24th St., NW, Suite 250 Place: Washington, District of Columbia Zip: 20037 Product: Global investor...

  4. Klickitat County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype B. Energy Generation Facilities in Klickitat County, Washington Roosevelt Biogas 1 Biomass Facility Places in Klickitat County, Washington Bickleton, Washington...

  5. Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State November 8, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis Mercer Island celebrates the 500th Solarize installation in the state of Washington with a ribbon cutting at the Auto-Spa car wash. Mercer Island celebrates the 500th Solarize installation in the state of Washington with a ribbon cutting at the Auto-Spa car wash. EERE SunShot Initiative awardee Evergreen State

  6. Washington, DC.20585

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    . . Department of ,En&gy Washington, DC.20585 , ' . The Honorable Thomas, Murphy : ~ ,, 414 Grant.Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Dear Rayor Murphy:. Secretary of Energy HazelO'Leary has announced a new'approach to openness in the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications with the public. In support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the enclosed information related to the Teledyne-Columbia-Summerville~site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE's

  7. I ' Washington, DC'

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ' Washington, DC' 20585 The.Honorable Don Trotter, 102' Public Square Clarksville, Tennessee '37040 '_ _' ' Dear Mayor Trotter: '. Secretary of Energy Hazel .O'Leary has announced a new the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward related to the Clarksville Foundry.& Machine Co. site approach to openness in with the publ,ic'. In " the~enclosed~information in your'jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its

  8. Feasibility Study of Economics and Performance of Solar Photovoltaics at the Snohomish County Cathcart Landfill Site in Snohomish County, Washington. A Study Prepared in Partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America's Land Initiative: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Olis, D.; Salasovich, J.; Mosey, G.; Healey, V.

    2013-04-01

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in accordance with the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, selected the Snohomish County Cathcart Landfill Site in Snohomish County, Washington, for a feasibility study of renewable energy production. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) provided technical assistance for this project. The purpose of this report is to assess the site for a photovoltaic (PV) system installation and estimate the cost, performance, and site impacts of different PV options. In addition, the report recommends financing options that could assist in the implementation of a PV system at the site.

  9. Fire Protection

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1066-2012 December 2012 _______________ Supersedes DOE-STD-1066-99 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION U.S. Department of Energy AREA FIRP Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web page at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1066-2012 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD) supersedes

  10. Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    144 December 2014 Page 1 Activity Specific Categorical Exclusion for U.S. Army Training Exercises and Simulations at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington 1.0 BACKGROUND Title 10, Part 1021 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 1021), "National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures," establishes procedures that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) uses to comply with section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 [42 U.S.C. 4332(2)] and the

  11. Washington, DC,20585

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    >/gGq ' ,, ' .. Department of Edgy Washington, DC,20585 ,I ' , APR 0 4 1995 The Honorable Patrick Ungaro 26 S. Phelps Street Youngstown, Ohio 44503 .' Dear );layor.Ungaro: Secretary of'Energy Hazel O'Leary has announced a new approach to openness in the Oepartment of Energy (DOE) and its coannunications with the public. In support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the,enclosed information related to the former Ajax-Hagnethermic C,orp. site in your jurisdiction that performed work

  12. Washington. DC,20585

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Washington. DC,20585 MAY' i 1995 .- The Honorable Freeman R. Bosley, Jr. ' r City Hall 1200 Narket Street St. Louis, Missouri 63103 Dear Mayor Bosley: ,'~ ,. : !' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary'has announced a new approach to'openness'in " the Department of,Energy"(DOE) and its communications with the pu~blic. In 'support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the enclosed information rel,ated to the former Petrolite Corp. site in your jurisdiction that,performed, work for

  13. Washington. DC.20585'

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Department ,of ,Energy Washington. DC.20585' 1 4~13 1995 The Honorable John. J. Monaco 301 11th Street New Kensington, Pennsylvania 15063 ; ' . Dear MayorMonaco: Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary has.announced a new approach to openness in the Department of, Energy (DOE) and its communications with the'public. In. support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the enclosed information related to the former Aluminum Company of America site in your jurisdic,tion thatperformed work for-DOE

  14. Recent developments: Washington focus

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1990-02-01

    Congress reconvened on January 23, but most of Washington`s January new involves the Administration. DOE sent two letters to USEC customers, awarded a contract for the independent financial review of the enrichment program, and released a plan for demonstrating AVLIS by 1992. A General Accounting Office (GAO) report investigating the impact of imports of Soviet EUP into the US was made public. Both Congress and the administration are reportedly considering a full-scope US-Soviet Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation. Finally, published reports indicate Congress may consider ending the customs user fee which levies a charge of 0.17% on the value of all imported goods. The fee is felt to violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and is not based on recovering actual Customs costs for processing a good. The fee brings the Treasury over $700 million per year, but the business community plans to lobby hard for its outright elimination or a change in authority to collect the fee based on actual costs.

  15. Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project Black-Cell and Hard-to-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Independent Oversight Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Black-Cell and Hard-To-Reach Pipe Spools Procurement Process and the Office of River Protection Audit of That Process January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0

  16. Washington Closure Hanford - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hanford Contracting ORP Contracts and Procurements RL Contracts and Procurements CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Mission Support Alliance Washington Closure Hanford HPM...

  17. Washington: Integrated Transportation Programs & Coordinated...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Integrated Transportation Programs & Coordinated Regional Planning Washington: Integrated Transportation Programs & Coordinated Regional Planning November 6, 2013 - 5:42pm Addthis ...

  18. BPA research aids Columbia River white sturgeon

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    research aids Columbia River white sturgeon 8142015 12:00 AM Tweet Page Content BPA fish biologist Scott Bettin (left) and Brad Cady of the Washington Dept. of Fish and...

  19. Overcharge Protection | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Protection Overcharge Protection 2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, June 7-11, 2010 -- Washington D.C. PDF icon es037_richardson_2010_o.pdf More Documents & Publications Overcharge Protection for PHEV Batteries Overcharge Protection for PHEV Batteries

  20. Columbia basin project, Washington: Adams, Douglas, Franklin, Grant, Lincoln, and Walla Walla Counties

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-01-01

    The Columbia Basin Project is a multipurpose development utilizing a portion of the resources of the Columbia River in the central part of the State of Washington. The key structure, Grand Coulee Dam, is on the main stem of the Columbia River about 90 miles west of Spokane, Wash. The extensive irrigation works extend southward on the Columbia Plateau 125 miles to the vicinity of Pasco, Wash., where the Snake and Columbia Rivers join.

  1. Spokane County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Spokane County, Washington Avista Corp City of Cheney, Washington (Utility Company) Modern Electric Water Company Places in Spokane County, Washington Airway Heights, Washington...

  2. WSDE Report: Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington State...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington State Author Washington State Department of Ecology Organization Washington State Department of Ecology Published Washington State...

  3. Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    with a ribbon cutting at the Auto-Spa car wash. Mercer Island celebrates the 500th Solarize installation in the state of Washington with a ribbon cutting at the Auto-Spa car wash. ...

  4. EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration to fund the portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement...

  5. Genetic and Phenotypic Catalog of Native Resident Trout of the interior Columbia River Basin : FY-2001 Report : Populations in the Wenatchee, Entiat, Lake Chelan and Methow River Drainages.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Trotter, Patrick C.

    2001-10-01

    The 1994 Fish and Wildlife Program of the Northwest Power Planning Council specifies the recovery and preservation of population health of native resident fishes of the Columbia River Basin. Among the native resident species of concern are interior rainbow trout of the Columbia River redband subspecies Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri 1 and westslope cutthroat trout O. clarki lewisi. The westslope cutthroat trout has been petitioned for listing under the U. S. Endangered Species Act (American Wildlands et al. 1997). Before at-risk populations can be protected, their presence and status must be established. Where introgression from introduced species is a concern, as in the case of both westslope cutthroat trout and redband rainbow trout, genetic issues must be addressed as well. As is true with native trout elsewhere in the western United States (Behnke 1992), most of the remaining pure populations of these species in the Columbia River Basin are in relatively remote headwater reaches. The objective of this project was to photo-document upper Columbia Basin native resident trout populations in Washington, and to ascertain their species or subspecies identity and relative genetic purity using a nonlethal DNA technique. FY-2001 was year three (and final year) of a project in which we conducted field visits to remote locations to seek out and catalog these populations. In FY-2001 we worked in collaboration with the Wenatchee National Forest to catalog populations in the Wenatchee, Entiat, Lake Chelan, and Methow River drainages of Washington State.

  6. Seattle, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Network Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Puget Sound Clean Cities Coalition Washington Clean Technology Alliance Registered Policy Organizations in Seattle, Washington Northwest SEED...

  7. Washington State University | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    University Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington State University Place: Spokane, WA Website: www.washingtonstateuniversity. References: Washington State University1...

  8. Harold Washington Social Security Administration (SSA) Center...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Harold Washington Social Security Administration (SSA) Center Water Conservation and Green Energy Harold Washington Social Security Administration (SSA) Center Water Conservation ...

  9. Washington TRU Solutions Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington TRU Solutions Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington TRU Solutions, Inc. Place: Carlsbad, New Mexico Zip: 88220 Product: New Mexico-based managing and...

  10. Washington/Incentives | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Biodiesel and Alcohol Fuel Blend Sales Tax Exemption (Washington) Sales Tax Incentive No...

  11. Washington Electric Coop, Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search Name: Washington Electric Coop, Inc Place: Ohio Website: www.weci.org Facebook: https:www.facebook.comWashingtonElectricCoop Outage Hotline: 740-373-2141...

  12. Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting:...

  13. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    " "'- STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY p.o. Box 47600 .Olympja, Washington 98504-7600 (360) 4076000 .TOD Only (Hearing Impaired) (360) 407-6006 ,'""""" .w.--.- ...

  14. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - 401 Water Quality...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Regulatory GuidanceGuideHandbook Author Washington State Department of Ecology Published Washington State Department of Ecology, 2014 DOI Not Provided Check for DOI...

  15. Washington Coastal Zone Management Regulatory Handbook | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Washington Coastal Zone Management Regulatory HandbookPermittingRegulatory GuidanceGuideHandbook Author Washington...

  16. Washington Gas- Residential Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington Gas as a part of the Maryland EmPOWER program offers incentives to its residential customer for making energy efficiency improvements. Rebates are available for qualifying water heaters,...

  17. Washington City Power- Net Metering

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington City adopted a net-metering program, including interconnection procedures, in January 2008, and updated the policy in December 2014.* Net metering is available to any customer of...

  18. Washington Gas- Commercial Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington Gas as a part of the Maryland EmPOWER program offers incentives to its commercial customer for making energy efficiency improvements. Rebates are available for qualifying water heaters,...

  19. EERE Success Story-Washington: Community Power Works is Building a More

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Efficient Seattle | Department of Energy Washington: Community Power Works is Building a More Efficient Seattle EERE Success Story-Washington: Community Power Works is Building a More Efficient Seattle July 26, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis Wedged between the Cascade and Olympic Mountain ranges and buffeted by lakes, rivers, and the awe-inspiring Puget Sound, Seattle has a legacy of environmental stewardship and a culture of innovation. Combined with thoughtful leadership on climate change, these

  20. Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company- June 4, 1996

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Potential Violations of the Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Rules at the Savannah River Site

  1. Preliminary Notice of Violation, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC- EA-2007-03

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Issued to CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC, related to Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project at the Idaho National Laboratory

  2. Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Eastern Washington University |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Washington University Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Eastern Washington University Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Eastern Washington University In 2007 Eastern Washington University accepted the challenge to reduce campus emissions by becoming signatory to the American Colleges and University President's Climate Commitment (ACUPCC). Installing electric vehicle charging stations in 2016 is one of many efforts that publically demonstrates Eastern's commitment

  3. Newseum Washington, D.C.

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE's Small Business Voucher Pilot program (Round 2), and engage in a discussion about DOE's research and development priorities for ocean wave, tidal, current, and river energy. ...

  4. Greenhouse gas mitigation options for Washington State

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Garcia, N.

    1996-04-01

    President Clinton, in 1993, established a goal for the United States to return emissions of greenhouse gases to 1990 levels by the year 2000. One effort established to help meet this goal was a three part Environmental Protection Agency state grant program. Washington State completed part one of this program with the release of the 1990 greenhouse gas emissions inventory and 2010 projected inventory. This document completes part two by detailing alternative greenhouse gas mitigation options. In part three of the program EPA, working in partnership with the States, may help fund innovative greenhouse gas reduction strategies. The greenhouse gas control options analyzed in this report have a wide range of greenhouse gas reductions, costs, and implementation requirements. In order to select and implement a prudent mix of control strategies, policy makers need to have some notion of the potential change in climate, the consequences of that change and the uncertainties contained therein. By understanding the risks of climate change, policy makers can better balance the use of scarce public resources for concerns that are immediate and present against those that affect future generations. Therefore, prior to analyzing alternative greenhouse gas control measures, this report briefly describes the phenomenon and uncertainties of global climate change, and then projects the likely consequences for Washington state.

  5. DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Savannah River Site | Department of Energy Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The

  6. Reintroduction of Lower Columbia River Chum Salmon into Duncan Creek, 2007 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hillson, Todd D.

    2009-06-12

    The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed Lower Columbia River (LCR) chum salmon as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in March, 1999 (64 FR 14508, March 25, 1999). The listing was in response to the reduction in abundance from historical levels of more than one-half million returning adults to fewer than 10,000 present-day spawners. Harvest, habitat degradation, changes in flow regimes, riverbed movement and heavy siltation have been largely responsible for this decline. The timing of seasonal changes in river flow and water temperatures is perhaps the most critical factor in structuring the freshwater life history of this species. This is especially true of the population located directly below Bonneville Dam, where hydropower operations can block access to spawning sites, dewater redds, strand fry, cause scour or fill of redds and increase sedimentation of spawning gravels. Prior to 1997, only two chum salmon populations were recognized as genetically distinct in the Columbia River, although spawning had been documented in many Lower Columbia River tributaries. The first population was in the Grays River (RKm 34), a tributary of the Columbia River, and the second was a group of spawners utilizing the mainstem Columbia River just below Bonneville Dam (RKm 235) adjacent to Ives Island and in Hardy and Hamilton creeks. Using additional DNA samples, Small et al. (2006) grouped chum salmon spawning in the mainstem Columbia River and the Washington State tributaries into three groups: the Coastal, the Cascade and the Gorge. The Coastal group comprises those spawning in the Grays River, Skamokawa Creek and the broodstock used at the Sea Resources facility on the Chinook River. The Cascade group comprises those spawning in the Cowlitz (both summer and fall stocks), Kalama, Lewis, and East Fork Lewis rivers, with most supporting unique populations. The Gorge group comprises those spawning in the mainstem Columbia River from the I-205 Bridge up to Bonneville Dam and those spawning in Hamilton and Hardy creeks. Response to the federal ESA listing has been primarily through direct-recovery actions: reducing harvest, hatchery supplementation using local broodstock for populations at catastrophic risk, habitat restoration (including construction of spawning channels) and flow agreements to protect spawning and rearing areas. Both state and federal agencies have built controlled spawning areas. In 1998, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) began a chum salmon supplementation program using native stock on the Grays River. This program was expanded during 1999 - 2001 to include reintroduction into the Chinook River using eggs from the Grays River Supplementation Program. These eggs are incubated at the Grays River Hatchery, reared to release size at the Sea Resources Hatchery on the Chinook River, and the fry are released at the mouth of the Chinook River. Native steelhead, chum, and coho salmon are present in Duncan Creek, and are recognized as subpopulations of the Lower Gorge population, and are focal species in the Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board (LCFRB) plan. Steelhead, chum and coho salmon that spawn in Duncan Creek are listed as Threatened under the ESA. Duncan Creek is classified by the LCFRB plan as a watershed for intensive monitoring (LCFRB 2004). This project was identified in the 2004 Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) revised Biological Opinion (revised BiOp) to increase survival of chum salmon, 'BPA will continue to fund the program to re-introduce Columbia River chum salmon into Duncan Creek as long as NOAA Fisheries determines it to be an essential and effective contribution to reducing the risk of extinction for this ESU'. (USACE et al. 2004, page 85-86). The Governors Forum on Monitoring and Salmon Recovery and Watershed Health recommends one major population from each ESU have adult and juvenile monitoring. Duncan Creek chum salmon are identified in this plan to be intensively monitored. Planners recommended that a combination of natural and hatchery production

  7. Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Issaquah is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  8. Duvall, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Duvall is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  9. Carnation, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Carnation is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  10. Burien, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Burien is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 7th congressional district and...

  11. Algona, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Algona is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 9th congressional district.12...

  12. Redmond, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Redmond is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 1st congressional district and...

  13. Pacific, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Pacific is a city in King County and Pierce County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 9th congressional...

  14. Auburn, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Auburn is a city in King County and Pierce County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional...

  15. Enumclaw, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Enumclaw is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  16. Renton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Renton is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 7th congressional district and...

  17. Medina, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Medina is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  18. Newcastle, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Newcastle is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  19. Shoreline, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Shoreline is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 1st congressional district and...

  20. Kenmore, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Kenmore is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 1st congressional district.12...

  1. Woodinville, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Woodinville is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 1st congressional district.12...

  2. Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Snoqualmie is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  3. Bellevue, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Bellevue is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  4. Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Sammamish is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  5. Covington, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Covington is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  6. Milton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Milton is a city in King County and Pierce County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 9th congressional...

  7. Tukwila, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Tukwila is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 7th congressional district and...

  8. Bothell, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Bothell is a city in King County and Snohomish County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 1st congressional...

  9. Skykomish, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Skykomish is a town in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 2nd congressional district.12...

  10. Kent, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Kent is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district and...

  11. Washington DC | OpenEI Community

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    DC Home Linked Open Data Workshop in Washington, D.C. Description: A group organizing the LOD workshop in Washington, D.C. in fall 2012 A follow-up event to the successful LOD...

  12. Hatton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Hatton is a town in Adams County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 5th congressional district.12...

  13. Lind, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Lind is a town in Adams County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 5th congressional district.12...

  14. Othello, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Othello is a city in Adams County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 4th congressional district.12...

  15. Richland, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Richland is a city in Benton County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 4th congressional...

  16. Washington Elec Member Corp | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Elec Member Corp Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington Elec Member Corp Place: Georgia Phone Number: 478-552-2577; 1-800-552-2577 Website: washingtonemc.com...

  17. An Economic Engine for Washington State

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    pnnl.gov An Economic Engine for Washington State When Washington State leaders share their visions for a vibrant future, certain priorities rise to the top: jobs, education, and an...

  18. Washington -- SEP Data Dashboard | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    The data dashboard for Washington -- SEP, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program. File Washington -- SEP Data Dashboard More Documents & Publications Santa Barbara County, California Data Dashboard Kansas City Data Dashboard Massachusetts -- SEP Data Dashboard

  19. Washington State Department of Natural Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Natural Resources Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington State Department of Natural Resources Name: Washington State Department of Natural Resources Address: 1111 Washington...

  20. Washington State Department of Ecology | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Ecology Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington State Department of Ecology Name: Washington State Department of Ecology Place: Lacey, Washington Zip: 98503 References:...

  1. Washington State Species of Concern Lists | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Web Site: Washington State Species of Concern Lists Author Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Published State of Washington, Date Not Provided DOI Not Provided Check for...

  2. Gig Harbor, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington. It falls under Washington's 6th congressional district.12 Registered Energy Companies in Gig Harbor, Washington Inventure Chemical Technology Structural...

  3. Washington -- SEP Summary of Reported Data | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Summary of Reported Data Washington -- SEP Summary of Reported Data Summary of data reported by Better Buildings Neighborhood Program partner Washington -- SEP. Washington -- SEP...

  4. EIS-0456: Cushman Hydroelectric Project, Tacoma, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS is for the design and construction of certain components of the Cushman Hydroelectric Project in Mason County, Washington.

  5. Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    comparable assessment of results. As part of the review process, the Contractor Supply Chain Council (CSCC) was tasked to survey and catalog all cost savings methods and measures...

  6. Washington,

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    DC 20585 December 20, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT FROM: William S. Maharay Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act" Audit Report No.: OAS-L-06-04 We reviewed selected aspects of the Department.of Energy's (Department) implementation of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act

  7. Washington

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    20585 April 15, 2013 Mr. David Martin, Chair Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Dear Mr. Martin: Thank you for your February 27, 2013 ,...

  8. New Columbia River Estuary purchases benefit salmon

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    the mouth of the Columbia River to permanently protect riverside habitat for Northwest fish and wildlife, including threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead. The...

  9. Brochure: Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    these agencies maximize the use of the Columbia River by generating power, protecting fish and wildlife, controlling floods, providing irrigation and navigation, and sustaining...

  10. River Corridor Closure Project Partnering Performance Agreement...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    - March 2009 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, River Corridor Closure Project - June 2012 Indoctrinating Subcontractors into the DOE Safety Culture and Expectations...

  11. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Volume 3, Book 1 Section 1: Overview Section 2: Topics of Interest Section 3: Individual Commentors U.S. Department of Energy November 2012 1 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperating Agencies: Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title: Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS) (DOE/EIS-0391) Location: Benton County,

  12. Washington State Department of Transportation | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Transportation Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington State Department of Transportation Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Abbreviation: WDOT Place:...

  13. Washington's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    7th congressional district ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center Washington Technology Center Registered Networking...

  14. Tectonic control of coastal onlap cycles, southwest Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Armentrout, J.M.

    1987-05-01

    Local coastal onlap and paleobiobathymetric curves for 14 sections define three Cenozoic depositional onlap-offlap cycles separated by regionally significant unconformities. A paleoclimatic curve for western Oregon and Washington, based on paleoecologic data sets, demonstrates that the local transgressions are coincident with cool climates and the regressions with warm climates, and are therefore not driven by glacioeustatic cycles. Comparison of the local coastal onlap and paleobiobathymetric curves with the global Cenozoic Cycle Chart (modified Exxon Sea Level Chart - May, 1986) further demonstrates the uniqueness of the western Washington curves. The global Cenozoic cycle Chart curve represents coastal onlap and sea level curves based on integration of both climate and tectonic variations. The non-parallel cycle pattern for southwest Washington suggests a unique tectonically forced system. Evidence derived from stratigraphic sequences, igneous rock geochemistry, radiometric dating, remnant magnetic patterns, sandstone provenance studies, and paleogeographic reconstructions is used to identify the tectonic events controlling the local depositional cycles. The principal events are (1) middle Eocene accretion of a seamount chain; (2) early-late Eocene westward relocation of subduction; (3) late Eocene onset of Cascade arc volcanism; (4) late-early Miocene plate readjustment due to back-arc extension in the Columbia River Plateau and Great Basin; and (5) late Pliocene to early Pleistocene northeast compression forced by continued subduction of remnants of the Kula Plate beneath North America.

  15. Washington Nuclear Profile - Power Plants

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Washington nuclear power plants, summer capacity and net generation, 2010" "Plant name/total reactors","Summer capacity (mw)","Net generation (thousand mwh)","Share of State nuclear net generation (percent)","Owner" "Columbia Generating Station Unit 2","1,097","9,241",100.0,"Energy Northwest" "1 Plant 1 Reactor","1,097","9,241",100.0

  16. Washington, DC~ZO585

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    jpfl.3%2' ) .,Departhent of Eikrgj! : Washington, DC~ZO585 .-, , , Lf; I: ~.1,' .Yj4 , The Honorable Louis Barlup 55 ,E. Main Street Waynesboro;,Pennsy,lvania 17268 '~ Dear Mayor Barl,up:' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary has'announced' a new approach to openness,in the Department of Energy-(DOE) and its communications with the public. In support-of this initiative, we are pleased.to forward the enclosed information related to the former Landis Machine Tool Co. site in your jurisdiction that

  17. Savannah River Site Manager Jack Craig Wins Highest Civil Service Award |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Savannah River Site Manager Jack Craig Wins Highest Civil Service Award Savannah River Site Manager Jack Craig Wins Highest Civil Service Award December 29, 2015 - 1:00pm Addthis DOE Savannah River Operations Office Manager Jack Craig DOE Savannah River Operations Office Manager Jack Craig WASHINGTON, D.C. - DOE Savannah River Operations Office Manager Jack Craig recently received the nation's highest civil service recognition, the Presidential Rank of Distinguished

  18. Columbia River Component Data Gap Analysis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    L. C. Hulstrom

    2007-10-23

    This Data Gap Analysis report documents the results of a study conducted by Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) to compile and reivew the currently available surface water and sediment data for the Columbia River near and downstream of the Hanford Site. This Data Gap Analysis study was conducted to review the adequacy of the existing surface water and sediment data set from the Columbia River, with specific reference to the use of the data in future site characterization and screening level risk assessments.

  19. PILOT-SCALE TEST RESULTS OF A THIN FILM EVAPORATOR SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT OF LIQUID HIGH-LEVEL WASTES AT THE HANFORD SITE WASHINGTON USA -11364

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    CORBETT JE; TEDESCH AR; WILSON RA; BECK TH; LARKIN J

    2011-02-14

    A modular, transportable evaporator system, using thin film evaporative technology, is planned for deployment at the Hanford radioactive waste storage tank complex. This technology, herein referred to as a wiped film evaporator (WFE), will be located at grade level above an underground storage tank to receive pumped liquids, concentrate the liquid stream from 1.1 specific gravity to approximately 1.4 and then return the concentrated solution back into the tank. Water is removed by evaporation at an internal heated drum surface exposed to high vacuum. The condensed water stream will be shipped to the site effluent treatment facility for final disposal. This operation provides significant risk mitigation to failure of the aging 242-A Evaporator facility; the only operating evaporative system at Hanford maximizing waste storage. This technology is being implemented through a development and deployment project by the tank farm operating contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), for the Office of River Protection/Department of Energy (ORPIDOE), through Columbia Energy and Environmental Services, Inc. (Columbia Energy). The project will finalize technology maturity and install a system at one of the double-shell tank farms. This paper summarizes results of a pilot-scale test program conducted during calendar year 2010 as part of the ongoing technology maturation development scope for the WFE.

  20. Marchetti New CEO of Washington TRU Solutions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    For Immediate Release Marchetti New CEO of Washington TRU Solutions CARLSBAD, N.M., July 31, 2003 - Stephen Marchetti, Executive Vice President of Operations for the Energy and Environment unit of Washington Group International, has been chosen to replace Pres Rahe as Chairman and CEO of Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS). WTS, the prime contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, NM, is responsible for cleanup and disposal of the

  1. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Washington Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 11, 2016 CX-100568 Categorical Exclusion Determination Survivability Enhancement of a Multi-Mode Point Absorber Award Number: DE-EE0007346 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Water Power Program Date: 03/10/2016 Location(s): WA Office(s): Golden Field Office March 4, 2016 CX-100566 Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal

  2. Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site Fact Sheet

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site This fact sheet provides information about the Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site. This site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. Location of the Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site Site Description and History The Sherwood disposal site is a former uranium-ore processing site operated by Western Nuclear, Inc. The site is in Stevens County near the

  3. Monitor and Protect Wigwam River Bull Trout for Koocanusa Reservoir : Summary of the Skookumchuck Creek Bull Trout Enumeration Project, Annual Report 2000.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Baxter, James S.; Baxter, Jeremy

    2001-02-01

    An enumeration fence and traps were installed on Skookumchuck Creek from September 7 th to October 16 th to enable the capture of post-spawning bull trout emigrating out of the watershed. During the study period, a total of 252 bull trout were sampled through the enumeration fence. Length, weight, and sex were determined for all but one of the 252 bull trout captured. In total, one fish of undetermined sex, 63 males and 188 females were processed through the fence. A total of 67 bull trout were observed on a snorkel survey prior to the fence being removed on October 16 th . Coupled with the fence count, the total bull trout count during this project was 319 fish. Several other species of fish were captured at the enumeration fence including westslope cutthroat trout, Rocky Mountain whitefish, kokanee, sucker, and Eastern brook trout. Redds were observed during ground surveys in three different locations (river km 27.5- 28.5, km 29-30, and km 24-25). The largest concentration of redds were noted in the upper two sections which have served as the index sections over the past four years. A total of 197 bull trout redds were enumerated on the ground on October 4 th . The majority of redds (n=189) were observed in the 3.0 km index section (river km 27.5-30.5) that has been surveyed over the past four years. The additional 8 redds were observed in a 1.5 km section (river km 24.0-25.5). Summary plots of water temperature for Bradford Creek, Sandown Creek, Skookumchuck Creek at km 39.5, and Skookumchuck Creek at the fence site suggested that water temperatures were within the range preferred by bull trout for spawning, egg incubation, and rearing.

  4. Monitor and Protect Wigwam River Bull Trout for Koocanusa Reservoir : Summary of the Skookumchuck Creek Bull Trout Enumeration Project, Annual Report 2001.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Baxter, James S.; Baxter, Jeremy

    2002-03-01

    This report summarizes the second year of a bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) enumeration project on Skookumchuck Creek in southeastern British Columbia. An enumeration fence and traps were installed on the creek from September 6th to October 12th 2001 to enable the capture of post-spawning bull trout emigrating out of the watershed. During the study period, a total of 273 bull trout were sampled through the enumeration fence. Length and weight were determined for all bull trout captured. In total, 39 fish of undetermined sex, 61 males and 173 females were processed through the fence. An additional 19 bull trout were observed on a snorkel survey prior to the fence being removed on October 12th. Coupled with the fence count, the total bull trout enumerated during this project was 292 fish. Several other species of fish were captured at the enumeration fence including westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi), Rocky Mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), and kokanee (O. nerka). A total of 143 bull trout redds were enumerated on the ground in two different locations (river km 27.5-30.5, and km 24.0-25.5) on October 3rd. The majority of redds (n=132) were observed in the 3.0 km index section (river km 27.5-30.5) that has been surveyed over the past five years. The additional 11 redds were observed in a 1.5 km section (river km 24.0-25.5). Summary plots of water temperature for Bradford Creek, Sandown Creek, Buhl Creek, and Skookumchuck Creek at three locations suggested that water temperatures were within the temperature range preferred by bull trout for spawning, egg incubation, and rearing.

  5. Washington: Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves 2012 R&D 100 Award Washington: ... Improving charge time and these other battery characteristics could significantly expand ...

  6. Everett, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    District Smart Grid Project Utility Companies in Everett, Washington Snohomish County PUD No 1 References US Census Bureau Incorporated place and minor civil division...

  7. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - Geothermal Drilling...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    PermitLegal Abstract The State of Washington Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance provides a FAQs resource for developers. Published NA Year Signed or...

  8. Washington Energy Facility Site Evalutation Council - Siting...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Washington Energy Facility Site Evalutation Council - Siting and Review Process Abstract Overview of the siting and review process for...

  9. Washington Energy Facility Site Evalutation Council - Generalized...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Reference LibraryAdd to library Chart: Washington Energy Facility Site Evalutation Council - Generalized Siting ProcessInfo GraphicMapChart Abstract Flowchart showing the...

  10. Washington County, Tennessee: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    4 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Washington County, Tennessee Fall Branch, Tennessee Gray, Tennessee Johnson City, Tennessee Jonesborough, Tennessee Midway, Tennessee Oak Grove,...

  11. ,"Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","9302015" ,"Next Release...

  12. ,"Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","9302015" ,"Next Release...

  13. Tacoma, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    9th congressional district.12 Energy Generation Facilities in Tacoma, Washington Simpson Tacoma Biomass Facility References US Census Bureau Incorporated place and minor...

  14. Washington County, Wisconsin: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype A. Registered Energy Companies in Washington County, Wisconsin A.O. Smith Johnson Controls Optima Batteries Oskosh Tech Laboratories Inc WE Energies Energy...

  15. Washington Gas- Commercial Efficiency Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington Gas offers rebates to commercial customers for the purchase and installation of energy efficient equipment. Rebates for available for water heating, space heating, boilers, and for...

  16. Washington, Maine: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington, Maine: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 44.2736858, -69.3672657 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingserv...

  17. Washington/Wind Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Guidebook >> Washington Wind Resources WindTurbine-icon.png Small Wind Guidebook * Introduction * First, How Can I Make My Home More Energy Efficient? * Is Wind Energy Practical...

  18. Washington International Renewable Energy Conference | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    International Renewable Energy Conference Washington International Renewable Energy Conference March 4, 2008 - 10:52am Addthis Remarks as Prepared For Delivery by Secretary Bodman ...

  19. Climate Action Champions: Metropolitan Washington Council of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) and its member governments are pioneering efforts to address and prepare for climate change and are recognized leaders in ...

  20. BLM Washington Office | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    www.blm.govwosteninfodire References: BLM Washington Office1 Cite error: tags exist, but no tag was found Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  1. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - Dangerous Waste Treatment...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Dangerous Waste Treatment Storage Disposal Facility New Permit Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Washington Environmental Permit Handbook...

  2. Robert Berger > Asst. Professor - Western Washington University...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Robert Berger Asst. Professor - Western Washington University robert.berger@wwu.edu Formerly a member of the Neaton Group at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Robert finished his...

  3. USDA Rural Development Washington State Workshop

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture is hosting a Washington Rural Development Workshop. Speakers will cover local and regional broadband initiatives program and broadband success stories,...

  4. Bonneville Power Administration, Oregon Energy Northwest, Washington...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Bonneville Power Administration, Oregon Energy Northwest, Washington; Wholesale Electric Primary Credit Analyst: David N Bodek, New York (1) 212-438-7969; david.bodek@standardandpo...

  5. Ferndale, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Ferndale, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 48.8464991, -122.5910056 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapping...

  6. Rochester, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Rochester, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.8217664, -123.0962516 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappin...

  7. Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0342629, -122.8231915 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingser...

  8. Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.1273723, -118.3799751 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappin...

  9. Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7565354, -118.3105282 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappin...

  10. Aberdeen, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Aberdeen, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.9753708, -123.8157218 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapping...

  11. Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.5595702, -120.6220123 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappings...

  12. Acme, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Acme, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 48.7170574, -122.2051584 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingserv...

  13. Cheney, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Cheney, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Cheney, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4873895, -117.5757622 Show Map Loading...

  14. ,"Washington Natural Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals (MMcf...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release...

  15. Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Olympia, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0378741, -122.9006951 Show Map Loading...

  16. ,"Washington Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","930...

  17. Washington Parish, Louisiana: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Parish, Louisiana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 30.6163073, -92.057063 Show Map Loading map......

  18. Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6587802, -117.4260466 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappings...

  19. Vancouver, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Vancouver, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 45.6387281, -122.6614861 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappin...

  20. Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.888155, -122.6884595 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingse...

  1. ,"Washington Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","09...

  2. Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7989899, -122.8698523 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingse...

  3. Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Kirkland, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6814875, -122.2087353 Show Map Loading...

  4. Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6814875, -122.2087353 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapping...

  5. Tenino, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Tenino, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.8567662, -122.8529094 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingse...

  6. Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0378741, -122.9006951 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappings...

  7. ,"Washington Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (MMcf)...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Washington Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release...

  8. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - Underground Injection...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Underground Injection Control Registration webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Washington Environmental Permit Handbook -...

  9. Washington Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity ...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Washington Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun...

  10. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - NPDES General Permit...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - NPDES General Permit...

  11. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - NPDES Individual Permit...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - NPDES Individual Permit...

  12. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - NPDES Construction...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - NPDES Construction Stormwater...

  13. Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - Air Operating Permit...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Washington Environmental Permit Handbook - Air Operating PermitPermitting...

  14. Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Avista Corp References US Census Bureau Incorporated place and minor civil division population dataset (All States, all geography) US Census Bureau...

  15. Clean Cities: Western Washington Clean Cities coalition

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Studies where her studies focused on policies to stimulate the growth of renewable energy. 1904 Third Ave, Ste 105 Seattle, WA 98101 Western Washington Success Stories Watch...

  16. SSL Demonstration: Parking Garage Lighting, Washington, DC

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2013-06-01

    GATEWAY program report brief summarizing an SSL parking garage demonstration at the Dept. of Labor headquarters parking garage in Washington, DC.

  17. Genetic and Phenotype [Phenotypic] Catalog of Native Resident Trout of the interior Columbia River Basin : FY-99 Report : Populations of the Pend Oreille, Kettle, and Sanpoil River Basins of Colville National Forest.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Trotter, Patrick C.

    2001-05-01

    The 1994 Fish and Wildlife Program of the Northwest Power Planning Council specifies the recovery and preservation of population health of native resident fishes of the Columbia River Basin. Among the native resident species of concern are interior rainbow trout of the Columbia River redband subspecies Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri 1 and westslope cutthroat trout O. clarki lewisi. The westslope cutthroat trout has been petitioned for listing under the U. S. Endangered Species Act (American Wildlands et al. 1997). Before at-risk populations can be protected, their presence and status must be established. Where introgression from introduced species is a concern, as in the case of both westslope cutthroat trout and redband rainbow trout, genetic issues must be addressed as well. As is true with native trout elsewhere in the western United States (Behnke 1992), most of the remaining pure populations of these species in the Columbia River Basin are in relatively remote headwater reaches. The objective of this project is to photo-document upper Columbia Basin native resident trout populations in Washington, and to ascertain their species or subspecies identity and relative genetic purity using a nonlethal DNA technique. FY-99 was year two of a five-year project in which we conducted field visits to remote locations to seek out and catalog these populations. In FY-99 we worked in collaboration with the Colville National Forest and Kalispel Indian Tribe to catalog populations in the northeastern corner of Washington State.

  18. HANFORD SITE RIVER CORRIDOR CLEANUP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    BAZZELL, K.D.

    2006-02-01

    In 2005, the US Department of Energy (DOE) launched the third generation of closure contracts, including the River Corridor Closure (RCC) Contract at Hanford. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made on cleaning up the river shore that bordes Hanford. However, the most important cleanup challenges lie ahead. In March 2005, DOE awarded the Hanford River Corridor Closure Contract to Washington Closure Hanford (WCH), a limited liability company owned by Washington Group International, Bechtel National and CH2M HILL. It is a single-purpose company whose goal is to safely and efficiently accelerate cleanup in the 544 km{sup 2} Hanford river corridor and reduce or eliminate future obligations to DOE for maintaining long-term stewardship over the site. The RCC Contract is a cost-plus-incentive-fee closure contract, which incentivizes the contractor to reduce cost and accelerate the schedule. At $1.9 billion and seven years, WCH has accelerated cleaning up Hanford's river corridor significantly compared to the $3.2 billion and 10 years originally estimated by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Predictable funding is one of the key features of the new contract, with funding set by contract at $183 million in fiscal year (FY) 2006 and peaking at $387 million in FY2012. Another feature of the contract allows for Washington Closure to perform up to 40% of the value of the contract and subcontract the balance. One of the major challenges in the next few years will be to identify and qualify sufficient subcontractors to meet the goal.

  19. Monitor and Protect Wigwam River Bull Trout for Koocanusa Reservoir : Summary of the Skookumchuck Creek Bull Trout Enumeration Project Final Report 2000-2002.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Baxter, Jeremy; Baxter, James S.

    2002-12-01

    This report summarizes the third and final year of a bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) enumeration project on Skookumchuck Creek in southeastern British Columbia. The fence and traps were operated from September 6th to October 11th 2002 in order to enumerate post-spawning bull trout. During the study period a total of 309 bull trout were captured at the fence. In total, 16 fish of undetermined sex, 114 males and 179 females were processed at the fence. Length and weight data, as well as recapture information, were collected for these fish. An additional 41 bull trout were enumerated upstream of the fence by snorkeling prior to fence removal. Coupled with the fence count, the total bull trout enumerated during the project was 350 individuals. Several fish that were tagged in the lower Bull River were recaptured in 2002, as were repeat and alternate year spawners previously enumerated in past years at the fence. A total of 149 bull trout redds were enumerated on the ground in 2002, of which 143 were in the 3.0 km index section (river km 27.5-30.5) that has been surveyed over the past six years. The results of the three year project are summarized, and population characteristics are discussed.

  20. Washington State biomass data book

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Deshaye, J.A.; Kerstetter, J.D.

    1991-07-01

    This is the first edition of the Washington State Biomass Databook. It assess sources and approximate costs of biomass fuels, presents a view of current users, identifies potential users in the public and private sectors, and lists prices of competing energy resources. The summary describes key from data from the categories listed above. Part 1, Biomass Supply, presents data increasing levels of detail on agricultural residues, biogas, municipal solid waste, and wood waste. Part 2, Current Industrial and Commercial Use, demonstrates how biomass is successfully being used in existing facilities as an alternative fuel source. Part 3, Potential Demand, describes potential energy-intensive public and private sector facilities. Part 4, Prices of Competing Energy Resources, shows current suppliers of electricity and natural gas and compares utility company rates. 49 refs., 43 figs., 72 tabs.

  1. DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site DOE Issues Salt Waste Determination for the Savannah River Site January 18, 2006 - 10:49am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued the waste determination for the treatment and stabilization of low activity salt-waste at the Savannah River Site allowing for significant reductions in environmental and health risks posed by the material. Stored in forty-nine underground tanks,

  2. Cleanup Performance Prompts Contract Changes at Hanford's River Corridor

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    | Department of Energy Performance Prompts Contract Changes at Hanford's River Corridor Cleanup Performance Prompts Contract Changes at Hanford's River Corridor June 30, 2015 - 12:00pm Addthis RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office has added an additional year to the current River Corridor Closure contract held by Washington Closure Hanford (WCH). The contract will now run to Sept. 30, 2016, focusing primarily on completing the trench work at the 618-10 Burial Ground and placing

  3. Implemntation of the Recovery Act at the Savannah River Site

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Implementation of the Recovery Act at the Savannah River Site OAS-RA-L-11-12 September 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 29, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE FROM: Daniel M. Weeber, Director Environment, Technology, and Corporate Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Implementation of the Recovery Act at the Savannah River Site" Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-12 BACKGROUND The

  4. National Register of Historic Places multiple property documentation form -- Historic, archaeological, and traditional cultural properties of the Hanford Site, Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nickens, P.R.

    1997-08-01

    The US Department of Energy`s Hanford Site encompasses an area of 560 square miles on the Columbia River in southeastern Washington. Since 1943, the Hanford Site has existed as a protected area for activities primarily related to the production of radioactive materials for national defense uses. For cultural resources on the Hanford Site, establishment of the nuclear reservation as a high security area, with public access restricted, has resulted in a well-protected status, although no deliberate resource protection measures were in effect to mitigate effects of facilities construction and associated activities. Thus, the Hanford Site contains an extensive record of aboriginal archaeological sites and Native American cultural properties, along with pre-Hanford Euro-American sites (primarily archaeological in nature with the removal of most pre-1943 structures), and a considerable number of Manhattan Project/Cold War era buildings and structures. The recent mission change from production to clean up and disposal of DOE lands created a critical need for development and implementation of new and different cultural resource management strategies. DOE-RL has undertaken a preservation planning effort for the Hanford Site. The intent of this Plan is to enable DOE-RL to organize data and develop goals, objectives, and priorities for the identification, evaluation, registration, protection, preservation, and enhancement of the Site`s historical and cultural properties. Decisions made about the identification, evaluation, registration and treatment of historic properties are most aptly made when relationships between individual properties and other similar properties are considered. The historic context and the multiple property documentation (NTD) process provides DOE-RL the organizational framework for these decisions. Once significant patterns are identified, contexts developed, and expected properties are defined, the NTD process provides the foundation for future decisions concerning the management of significant cultural resources on the Hanford Site.

  5. Robert Blankenship Director Washington University Dewey Holten

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Blankenship Director Washington University Dewey Holten Associate Director Washington University Steering Committee Operations Committee Laboratory Facilities Scientific Advisory Committee Mass Spectrometer Facility Hao Zhang Research Scientist Photobioreactor Facility Chris Sherman Research/Lab Assistant Ultrafast Laser Facility Dariusz Niedzwiedzki Research Scientist Kaslina Love Mosley Manager, Research Administration & Operations Rachel Ruggirello Education & Outreach Coordinator

  6. Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. PDF icon state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_wa.pdf More Documents & Publications Kansas State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement South Dakota State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Utah State Historic

  7. Screening assessment and requirements for a comprehensive assessment: Volume 1, Draft. Columbia River comprehensive impact assessment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-04-01

    To evaluate the impact to the Columbia River from the Hanford Site-derived contaminants, the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Washington State Department of Ecology initiated a study referred to as the Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment (CRCIA). To address concerns about the scope and direction of CRCIA as well as enhance regulator, tribal, stockholder, and public involvement, the CRCIA Management Team was formed in August 1995. The Team agreed to conduct CRCIA using a phased approach. The initial phase, includes two components: 1) a screening assessment to evaluate the potential impact to the river, resulting from current levels of Hanford-derived contaminants in order to support decisions on Interim Remedial Measures, and 2) a definition of the essential work remaining to provide an acceptable comprehensive river impact assessment. The screening assessment is described in Part I of this report. The essential work remaining is Part II of this report. The objective of the screening assessment is to identify areas where the greatest potential exists for adverse effects on humans or the environment. Part I of this report discusses the scope, technical approach, and results of the screening assessment. Part II defines a new paradigm for predecisional participation by those affected by Hanford cleanup decisions.

  8. Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Washington Area New Automobile

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Dealers Association | Department of Energy Washington Area New Automobile Dealers Association Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Washington Area New Automobile Dealers Association Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Washington Area New Automobile Dealers Association Washington Area New Automobile Dealers Association (WANADA) serves as the representative organization for all franchised new car dealers in the metropolitan Washington region. Workplace charging matches the vision of these

  9. The Wallula fault and tectonic framework of south-central Washington, as interpreted from magnetic and gravity anomalies

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Blakely, Richard J.; Sherrod, Brian; Weaver, Craig; Wells, Ray E.; Rohay, Alan C.

    2014-06-11

    Magnetic and gravity data, collected in south-central Washington near the Yakima Fold and Thrust Belt (YFTB) are used to model upper crustal structure, the extent of the late Columbia River Basalt flow named the Ice Harbor member, the vertical conduits (dikes) that the Ice Harbor erupted from, and whether the dikes are offset or affected by faulting on the Wallula Fault zone.

  10. Washington, D.C. Roundtable Summary | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Washington, D.C. Roundtable Summary Washington, D.C. Roundtable Summary Summary of the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtable held March 30, 2011, in Washington, D.C. PDF icon ...

  11. Building a Greener, More Resilient Future in Washington State | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Building a Greener, More Resilient Future in Washington State Building a Greener, More Resilient Future in Washington State July 18, 2014 - 1:45pm Addthis Washington State Governor Jay Inslee, UniEnergy Technologies CEO Dr. Z. Gary Yang, and Assistant Secretary Patricia Hoffman (left to right) at the July 8 event in Mukilteo, Washington. Photo courtesy of Office of Washington State Governor Jay Inslee Washington State Governor Jay Inslee, UniEnergy Technologies CEO Dr. Z. Gary

  12. Annual Coded Wire Tag Program; Washington Missing Production Groups, 1994 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fuss, Howard J.; Ashbrook, Charmane; Doty, Daniel (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

    1994-12-01

    The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) funds the ``Annual Coded Wire Tag Program -- Missing Production Groups for Columbia River Hatcheries`` project. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) [formerly the Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF) and the Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW)], Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) all operate salmon and steelhead rearing programs in the Columbia River basin. The intent of the funding is to coded-wire tag at least one production group of each species at each Columbia Basin hatchery to provide a holistic assessment of survival and catch distribution over time. Data generated by this project contributes to WDFW`s obligations for representative tagging under the Endangered. Species Act (ESA) permit for operating Columbia Basin facilities. WDFW facilities operating outside the Snake River basin are required to have a Section 10, ``Incidental Take`` permit. Consistent with special conditions within this permit, WDFW has now reached it`s objective to tag representative groups from all WDFW Columbia Basin releases.

  13. 2013 Washington Auto Show | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Washington Auto Show 2013 Washington Auto Show Addthis 1 of 10 While at the Washington Auto Show, Energy Secretary Steven Chu visited Nissan to see the 2013 Leaf. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:50 2 of 10 The new Nissan Leaf is being built at the company's Smyrna, Tennessee, Vehicle Assembly Plant -- helping to cut the price of its electric vehicle. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:49 3 of 10 Energy

  14. 2016 Washington Auto Show | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Washington Auto Show 2016 Washington Auto Show Addthis 1 of 20 Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz sits in the driver's seat of the all-electric Chevrolet Bolt at the Washington Auto Show. When it debuts on the road later this year, the Bolt will offer drivers about 200 miles of electric range. Image: Simon Edelman, Energy Department Date taken: 2016-01-21 09:45 2 of 20 The 2016 next-generation Chevrolet Volt builds on the success of its previous version, which was the first plug-in hybrid electric

  15. Grand Coulee Dam Wildlife Mitigation Program : Pygmy Rabbit Programmatic Management Plan, Douglas County, Washington.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ashley, Paul

    1992-06-01

    The Northwest Power Planning Council and the Bonneville Power Administration approved the pygmy rabbit project as partial mitigation for impacts caused by the construction of Grand Coulee Dam. The focus of this project is the protection and enhancement of shrub-steppe/pygmy rabbit habitat in northeastern Washington.

  16. Washington County, Nebraska: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington County, Nebraska Arlington, Nebraska Blair, Nebraska Fort Calhoun, Nebraska Herman, Nebraska Kennard, Nebraska Washington, Nebraska Retrieved from "http:en.openei.org...

  17. Sempra Energy Trading Corp (Washington) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sempra Energy Trading Corp (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name: Sempra Energy Trading Corp Place: Washington Phone Number: (877) SEMPRA1 Website: www.sempra.com Twitter:...

  18. Washington's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    district Avista Corp City of Cheney, Washington (Utility Company) Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleWashington%27s5thcongressionaldistrict&oldid189780...

  19. Washington's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Washington's 1st congressional district Snohomish County PUD No 1 Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleWashington%27s1stcongressionaldistrict&oldid189772...

  20. Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Biofuels LLC Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 2nd congressional district S.P. Everett Biomass Facility Utility Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district...

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Carnegie Institute of Washington...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Carnegie Institute of Washington Dept of Genetics - NY 0-07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Carnegie Institute of Washington (Dept. of Genetics) (NY.0-07 ) Eliminated from...

  2. Washington, D.C. and Indiana: Allison Hybrid Technology Achieves...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Washington, D.C. and Indiana: Allison Hybrid Technology Achieves Commercial Success Washington, D.C. and Indiana: Allison Hybrid Technology Achieves Commercial Success August 21,...

  3. Washington State Energy-Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Oregon State Energy-Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program Helps Low-Income Families Washington: RePower's Energy Dashboard Spurs Change on Bainbridge Island Washington: ...

  4. Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Abbreviation: EFSEC Place: Olympia, Washington...

  5. Washington State Environmental Policy Act | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Washington State Environmental Policy ActLegal Abstract The Washington State Environmental Policy Act...

  6. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Fish and Wildlife Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Name: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Abbreviation: WDFW...

  7. Washington Gas Energy Services (District of Columbia) | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Gas Energy Services (District of Columbia) Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington Gas Energy Services Place: District of Columbia References: EIA Form EIA-861...

  8. Washington Coastal Zone Management Webpage | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Washington Coastal Zone Management Webpage Abstract Provides overview of Washington's coastal...

  9. State of Washington Clean Energy Opportunity: Technical Market...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Technical Market Potential for CHP, August 2010 State of Washington Clean Energy Opportunity: Technical Market Potential for CHP, August 2010 The State of Washington has ...

  10. SEP Success Story: Washington State Becomes Largest Public Consumer...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    December 14, 2011 - 11:34am Addthis Auto and passenger ferries operated by the Washington ... Auto and passenger ferries operated by the Washington State Transportation Department ...

  11. Washington County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Number 3 Climate Zone Subtype B. Registered Energy Companies in Washington County, Utah Verdi Energy Group Places in Washington County, Utah Apple Valley, Utah Enterprise, Utah...

  12. Washington County, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Climate Zone Subtype A. Registered Energy Companies in Washington County, Ohio Michael Bradley Co. Michael Bradley Co.,Inc Solsil Inc Places in Washington County, Ohio Belpre, Ohio...

  13. Spokane Valley, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    city in Spokane County, Washington.1 Utility Companies in Spokane Valley, Washington Modern Electric Water Company References US Census Bureau Incorporated place and minor...

  14. Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America Cities, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America ...

  15. Port Washington, New York: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington, New York: Energy Resources (Redirected from Port Washington, NY) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.8256561, -73.6981858 Show Map...

  16. City of Port Angeles, Washington (Utility Company) | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Port Angeles, Washington (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: Port Angeles City of Place: Washington Phone Number: 360-457-0411 Website: wa-portangeles.civicplus.com...

  17. WASHINGTON GROUP TEAM WINS NEW CONTRACT TO MANAGE WASTE ISOLATION...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5, 2000 WASHINGTON GROUP TEAM WINS NEW CONTRACT TO MANAGE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT IN NEW MEXICO Boise, Idaho-Washington Group International, Inc. (NYSE: WNG), announced today...

  18. Washington's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 3rd congressional district WSU...

  19. RAPID/Geothermal/Land Access/Washington | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Basis: Royalty Distribution: ContactsAgencies: Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington State Department of Transportation State Land Access Process In...

  20. Garfield County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Climate Zone Number 5 Climate Zone Subtype B. Places in Garfield County, Washington Pomeroy, Washington Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleGarfieldCounty,W...

  1. Washington Department of Natural Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    of Natural Resources is located in Olympia, Washington. About About 600 gas and oil wells have been drilled in Washington, but large-scale commercial production has never...

  2. Washington's 8th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Energy Companies in Washington's 8th congressional district GreenFoot Technologies Prometheus Energy Sunreps Utility Companies in Washington's 8th congressional district Alder...

  3. Federal Utility Partnership Working Group 2011 Meeting: Washington...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FUPWG Spring 2011 Washington, D.C., Update Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting Chairman's Corner Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update...

  4. City of Milton, Washington (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Milton, Washington (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Milton Place: Washington Phone Number: (253) 922-8738 Website: cityofmilton.netpage.php?id1 Outage...

  5. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Fluor Federal Services, Inc.,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Richland, Washington - June 2011 | Department of Energy Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Richland, Washington - June 2011 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Richland, Washington - June 2011 June 2011 Evaluation to determine whether Fluor Federal Services, Inc., subcontractor on the Hanford Plateau Remediation Contract, is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition. The Team conducted its review during June 6-9, 2011 to determine

  6. Charging Up in King County, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    King County, Washington is spearheading a regional effort to develop a network of electric vehicle charging stations. It is also improving its vehicle fleet and made significant improvements to a...

  7. Washington Gas Energy Services | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Gas Energy Services Place: Virginia Phone Number: 1-844-427-5945 Website: www.wges.com Outage Hotline: 1-844-427-5945 References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for...

  8. Riverbend, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Riverbend is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  9. Vashon, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Vashon is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  10. Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Mirrormont is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  11. Tanner, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Tanner is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  12. Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Hobart is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  13. Eastgate, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Eastgate is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  14. Ravensdale, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Ravensdale is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  15. Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Kingsgate is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  16. Baring, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Baring is a census-designated place in King County, Washington.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  17. Washington Gas- Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington Gas provides a number of rebates to residential customers who utilize energy efficient equipment and measures in the home. Rebates are limited to natural gas furnaces and programmable...

  18. Fort Washington, Pennsylvania: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Fort Washington is a census-designated place in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.1 References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to 2006 CBSA...

  19. Charging Up in King County, Washington

    ScienceCinema (OSTI)

    Constantine, Dow; Oliver, LeAnn; Inslee, Jay; Sahandy, Sheida; Posthuma, Ron; Morrison, David;

    2013-05-29

    King County, Washington is spearheading a regional effort to develop a network of electric vehicle charging stations. It is also improving its vehicle fleet and made significant improvements to a low-income senior housing development.

  20. Physicists and Technologists in Washington | Jefferson Lab

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Physicists and Technologists in Washington April 4, 2012 Last week we were visited by Dr. Gerald Blazey, the assistant director for Physical Sciences of the Office of Science and...

  1. Washington Electric Coop Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Territory: Vermont Phone Number: (802) 223-5245 Website: www.washingtonelectric.coop Facebook: https:www.facebook.comWashingtonElectricCoop Outage Hotline: 1-800-932-5245....

  2. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY p.o. Box 47600 .Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 (360) 407-6000 .TOO Only (Hearing Impaired) (360) 407-6006 May 3, 2004 Todd Martin, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 1933 Jadwin Ave. Suite 135 Richland, W A 99352 Dear Mr. Martin: This letter is in response to your recent Hanford Advisory Board Consensus Advice #156 . requesting re-establishment of a forum to discuss Hanford's science and technology issues. Ecology agrees that the previous Site Technology Coordination

  3. 2015 Washington Auto Show | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Washington Auto Show 2015 Washington Auto Show Addthis Moniz Delivers Keynote Remarks 1 of 10 Moniz Delivers Keynote Remarks Secretary Moniz touted the Department's investments in advanced vehicle technologies, infrastructure and manufacturing. Photo by Sarah Gerrity Date taken: 2015-01-22 04:33 Secretary Moniz Announces More than $55M in Fuel-Efficient Vehicle Funding 2 of 10 Secretary Moniz Announces More than $55M in Fuel-Efficient Vehicle Funding The funding opportunities will go towards a

  4. Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update on May 22, 2013.

  5. Washington Success Story—A Performance Contracting Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Provides an overview case study of Washington's Performance Contracting Program. Author: Energy Services Coalition

  6. DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Savannah River Site | Department of Energy Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site December 8, 2008 - 4:58pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award to Savannah River Remediation, LLC as the liquid waste contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract

  7. Grays River Watershed and Biological Assessment Final Report 2006.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    May, Christopher W.; McGrath, Kathleen E.; Geist, David R.; Abbe, Timothy; Barton, Chase

    2008-02-04

    The Grays River Watershed and Biological Assessment was funded to address degradation and loss of spawning habitat for chum salmon (Onchorhynchus keta) and fall Chinook salmon (Onchoryhnchus tshawytscha). In 1999, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed lower Columbia River chum salmon as a threatened Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The Grays River watershed is one of two remaining significant chum salmon spawning locations in this ESU. Runs of Grays River chum and Chinook salmon have declined significantly during the past century, largely because of damage to spawning habitat associated with timber harvest and agriculture in the watershed. In addition, approximately 20-25% of the then-remaining chum salmon spawning habitat was lost during a 1999 channel avulsion that destroyed an important artificial spawning channel operated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Although the lack of stable, high-quality spawning habitat is considered the primary physical limitation on Grays River chum salmon production today, few data are available to guide watershed management and channel restoration activities. The objectives of the Grays River Watershed and Biological Assessment project were to (1) perform a comprehensive watershed and biological analysis, including hydrologic, geomorphic, and ecological assessments; (2) develop a prioritized list of actions that protect and restore critical chum and Chinook salmon spawning habitat in the Grays River based on comprehensive geomorphic, hydrologic, and stream channel assessments; and (3) gain a better understanding of chum and Chinook salmon habitat requirements and survival within the lower Columbia River and the Grays River. The watershed-based approach to river ecosystem restoration relies on a conceptual framework that describes general relationships between natural landscape characteristics, watershed-scale habitat-forming processes, aquatic habitat conditions, and biological integrity. In addition, human land-use impacts are factored into the conceptual model because they can alter habitat quality and can disrupt natural habitat-forming processes. In this model (Figure S.1), aquatic habitat--both instream and riparian--is viewed as the link between watershed conditions and biologic responses. Based on this conceptual model, assessment of habitat loss and the resultant declines in salmonid populations can be conducted by relating current and historical (e.g., natural) habitat conditions to salmonid utilization, diversity, and abundance. In addition, assessing disrupted ecosystem functions and processes within the watershed can aid in identifying the causes of habitat change and the associated decline in biological integrity. In this same way, restoration, enhancement, and conservation projects can be identified and prioritized. A watershed assessment is primarily a landscape-scale evaluation of current watershed conditions and the associated hydrogeomorphic riverine processes. The watershed assessment conducted for this project focused on watershed processes that form and maintain salmonid habitat. Landscape metrics describing the level of human alteration of natural ecosystem attributes were used as indicators of water quality, hydrology, channel geomorphology, instream habitat, and biotic integrity. Ecological (watershed) processes are related to and can be predicted based on specific aspects of spatial pattern. This study evaluated the hydrologic regime, sediment delivery regime, and riparian condition of the sub-watersheds that comprise the upper Grays River watershed relative to their natural range of conditions. Analyses relied primarily on available geographic information system (GIS) data describing landscape characteristics such as climate, vegetation type and maturity, geology and soils, topography, land use, and road density. In addition to watershed-scale landscape characteristics, the study area was also evaluated on the riparian scale, with appropriate landscape variables analyzed within

  8. Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Salt Waste...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility Construction Quality and Fire Protection Systems The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and...

  9. MEMORANDUM FOR SCOTI L. SAMUELSON MANAGER OFFICE OF RIVER PROTE...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    c7 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Delegation of Acquisition Executive Authority for Capital Asset Projects at Office of River Protection In accordance with the guidelines of...

  10. Type B Accident Investigation At Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Employee

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Fall Injury on July 1, 2009, At The 336 Building, Hanford Site, Washington | Department of Energy At Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Employee Fall Injury on July 1, 2009, At The 336 Building, Hanford Site, Washington Type B Accident Investigation At Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Employee Fall Injury on July 1, 2009, At The 336 Building, Hanford Site, Washington July 30, 2009 During D4 project demolition preparation work on the morning of July 1, 2009, in Hanford's 300 Area, a millwright

  11. IdJOO2 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 MAR 26 2004 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION R. Paul Detwiler, Acting Manager Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of...

  12. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 JAN 2 2 1982 -/ Departmznt'of Ene,rgy ATTN : Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. Mott: Enclosed is the list of contaminated'or potentially contaminated sites that I promised to send you during our recent meeting. The sites have been broken down into the followi,ng four categories: 1. Sites with known contamination that have never been 1 icensed. 2. Formerly licensed sites

  13. EM Update Newsletter Spotlights River Corridor Cleanup at Hanford Site |

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Department of Energy RICHLAND, Wash. - In this issue of the EM Update newsletter, EM marks the many accomplishments the Richland Operations Office and its contractors have achieved in cleanup along the Columbia River corridor at the Hanford Site. This year marked the 10th anniversary of the River Corridor Closure Contract, the nation's largest environmental cleanup closure project, managed by Washington Closure Hanford. The work has involved projects to clean up existing contamination and

  14. Department of Energy Cites Savannah River Nuclear Solutions for Worker

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Safety and Health Violations | Department of Energy Solutions for Worker Safety and Health Violations Department of Energy Cites Savannah River Nuclear Solutions for Worker Safety and Health Violations October 8, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Department of Energy has issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC (SRNS) for five violations of DOE's worker safety and health regulations and withheld $3.08 million in contract fee for

  15. EIS-0241: Hood River Fisheries Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS evaluates a BPA proposal to protect and improve anadromous salmonid populations in the Hood River Basin. These actions are proposed in an attempt to mitigate the losses of fish and...

  16. EIS-0384: Chief Joseph Hatchery Program, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS analyzes DOE's approach and associated impacts of a comprehensive management program for summer/fall Chinook salmon in the Okanogan subbasin and the Columbia River between the confluence of the Okanogan River and Chief Joseph Dam including construction, operation, and maintenance of a hatchery and acclimation ponds.

  17. Malheur River Wildlife Mitigation Project, Annual Report 2003.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ashley, Paul

    2004-01-01

    Hydropower development within the Columbia and Snake River Basins has significantly affected riparian, riverine, and adjacent upland habitats and the fish and wildlife species dependent upon them. Hydroelectric dams played a major role in the extinction or major loss of both anadromous and resident salmonid populations and altered instream and adjacent upland habitats, water quality, and riparian/riverine function. Hydroelectric facility construction and inundation directly affected fish and wildlife species and habitats. Secondary and tertiary impacts including road construction, urban development, irrigation, and conversion of native habitats to agriculture, due in part to the availability of irrigation water, continue to affect wildlife and fish populations throughout the Columbia and Snake River Basins. Fluctuating water levels resulting from facility operations have created exposed sand, cobble, and/or rock zones. These zones are generally devoid of vegetation with little opportunity to re-establish riparian plant communities. To address the habitat and wildlife losses, the United States Congress in 1980 passed the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Act) (P.L. 96-501), which authorized the states of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington to create the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council). The Act directed the Council to prepare a program in conjunction with federal, state, and tribal wildlife resource authorities to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife species affected by the construction, inundation and operation of hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin (NPPC 2000). Under the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Program), the region's fish and wildlife agencies, tribes, non-government organizations (NGOs), and the public propose fish and wildlife projects that address wildlife and fish losses resulting from dam construction and subsequent inundation. As directed by the Council, project proposals are subjected to a rigorous review process prior to receiving final approval. An eleven-member panel of scientists referred to as the Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) examines project proposals. The ISRP recommends project approval based on scientific merit. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA), Council staff, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and subbasin groups also review project proposals to ensure each project meets regional and subbasin goals and objectives. The Program also includes a public involvement component that gives the public an opportunity to provide meaningful input on management proposals. After a thorough review, the Burns Paiute Tribe (BPT) acquired the Malheur River Mitigation Project (Project) with BPA funds to compensate, in part, for the loss of fish and wildlife resources in the Columbia and Snake River Basins and to address a portion of the mitigation goals identified in the Council's Program (NPPC 2000).

  18. EIS-0184: South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS analyzes the Seattle City Light, a Department of the City of Seattle proposal to construct a hydroelectric project with an installed capacity of 15 MW on the South Fork Tolt River near the town of Carnation located in King County in the State of Washington.

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    July 3, 2014 CX-012329: Categorical Exclusion Determination PNNL Projects Involving Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects in the 300 Area ...

  20. Microsoft PowerPoint - 2011_1012_Hansen_ColumbiaRiverComponent_Eco.pptx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Component Risk Assessment Volume I: Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment (DOE/RL-2010-117, Draft A) Ri C id (DOE/RL 2010 117, Draft A) Overview and key findings River Corridor Closure Project River Corridor Closure Project y g O t b 2011 October, 2011 Protecting the Columbia River U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office RIVER CORRIDOR CLOSURE PROJECT Columbia River Component Columbia River Component Ecological Risk Assessment * Scope - Screening level ecological risk

  1. EIS-0205: Joint NEPA/SEPA Final Environmental Impact Statement Washington Windplant No. 1, Goldendale, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy’s Bonneville Power Administration prepared this statement in order to fulfill its National Environmental Policy Act obligations ahead of signing an agreement with the utilities that would purchase the Windplant’s power from KENETECH. KENETECH Windpower, Inc., proposes to construct and operate Washington Windplant No. 1 in the Columbia Hills area, southeast of Goldendale, in Klickitat County, Washington.

  2. Department of Energy Issues Final Request for Proposals for Savannah River

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Site Liquid Waste Contract | Department of Energy Request for Proposals for Savannah River Site Liquid Waste Contract Department of Energy Issues Final Request for Proposals for Savannah River Site Liquid Waste Contract September 13, 2007 - 2:33pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the release of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a Liquid Waste (LW) contractor for the Savannah River Site (SRS). The resulting

  3. Department of Energy Cites Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC for Worker

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Safety and Health Violations | Department of Energy Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC for Worker Safety and Health Violations Department of Energy Cites Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC for Worker Safety and Health Violations November 9, 2012 - 5:50pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of Energy has issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC (SRNS) for violations of the Department's worker safety

  4. Major Cold War Cleanup Milestone Reached at the Savannah River Site |

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Department of Energy Major Cold War Cleanup Milestone Reached at the Savannah River Site Major Cold War Cleanup Milestone Reached at the Savannah River Site March 29, 2012 - 10:37am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - Today, the Energy Department announced it has reached a major milestone in the Department's efforts to clean up the Cold War legacy at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina, laying the groundwork for closing two underground storage tanks that previously held radioactive liquid

  5. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Â… First Steps to Human Capacity Building

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Melissa Waitner, GPC Grant Writer 375 River Street Manistee, Michigan 49660 mwaitner@lrboi.com - The Little River Band of Ottawa Indians (LRBOI) is a Federally Recognized Tribal Nation located in Manistee, Michigan along the shores of Lake Michigan. - Our people are the descendants of nine Ottawa bands whose leaders were signatories to the 1836 Treaty of Washington and the 1855 Treaty of Detroit. - For over 100 years, succeeding generations of Ottawa leaders

  6. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Â… First Steps to Human Capacity Building

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Melissa Waitner, GPC Grant Writer 375 River Street Manistee, Michigan 49660 mwaitner@lrboi.com ď‚— The Little River Band of Ottawa Indians (LRBOI) is a Federally Recognized Tribal Nation located in Manistee, Michigan along the shores of Lake Michigan. ď‚— Our people are the descendants of nine Ottawa bands whose leaders were signatories to the 1836 Treaty of Washington and the 1855 Treaty of Detroit. ď‚— For over 100 years, succeeding generations of Ottawa

  7. George Washington University: School of Business Career Fair Fall 2015

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Location: George Washington University Foggy Bottom campus, School of Business, Duques Hall, 2201 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20052POC: Recruitment@doe.govWebsite: http://business.gwu.edu...

  8. Leasing State Trust Lands in Washington | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Leasing State Trust Lands in Washington Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Leasing State Trust Lands in WashingtonLegal...

  9. SeaTac, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. SeaTac is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 7th congressional district and...

  10. Mercer Island, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Mercer Island is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  11. Yarrow Point, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Yarrow Point is a town in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  12. Des Moines, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Des Moines is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 9th congressional district.12...

  13. Hunts Point, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Hunts Point is a town in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  14. Federal Way, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Federal Way is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 9th congressional district.12...

  15. Black Diamond, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Black Diamond is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  16. North Bend, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. North Bend is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  17. Clyde Hill, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Clyde Hill is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  18. Lake Forest Park, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Lake Forest Park is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 1st congressional district and...

  19. Maple Valley, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Maple Valley is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 8th congressional district.12...

  20. Normandy Park, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Normandy Park is a city in King County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 9th congressional district.12...

  1. Port Townsend, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Port Townsend is a city in Jefferson County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 6th...

  2. An Introduction to Washington Water Law | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Introduction to Washington Water Law Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: An Introduction to Washington Water LawLegal...

  3. Washington Island El Coop, Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Washington Island El Coop, Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington Island El Coop, Inc Place: Wisconsin Phone Number: 920-847-2541 Website: wiecoop.com Outage Hotline:...

  4. Potential Federal On-Site Solar Aggregation in Washington, D...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Potential Federal On-Site Solar Aggregation in Washington, D.C., and Maryland Potential Federal On-Site Solar Aggregation in Washington, D.C., and Maryland Presentation describes...

  5. ,"Washington Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    292016 12:16:33 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Washington Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","N3035WA3" "Date","Washington...

  6. DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP DOE Exercises 5 Year Option on Washington TRU Solutions Contract to Operate WIPP January 18, 2005 -...

  7. Lewis County, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    is 041. It is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 4 Climate Zone Subtype C. Utility Companies in Lewis County, Washington City of Centralia, Washington (Utility...

  8. Development of a high-resolution bathymetry dataset for the Columbia River through the Hanford Reach

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Coleman, Andre M.; Ward, Duane L.; Larson, Kyle B.; Lettrick, Joseph W.

    2010-10-08

    A bathymetric and topographic data collection and processing effort involving existing and newly collected data has been performed for the Columbia River through the Hanford Reach in central Washington State, extending 60-miles from the tailrace of Priest Rapids Dam (river mile 397) to near the vicinity of the Interstate 182 bridge just upstream of the Yakima River confluence (river mile 337). The contents of this report provide a description of the data collections, data inputs, processing methodology, and final data quality assessment used to develop a comprehensive and continuous merged 1m resolution bathymetric and topographic surface dataset for the Columbia River through the Hanford Reach.

  9. Savannah River Plant/Savannah River Laboratory radiation exposure report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rogers, C.D.; Hyman, S.D.; Keisler, L.L. and Co., Aiken, SC . Savannah River Plant); Reeder, D.F.; Jolly, L.; Spoerner, M.T.; Schramm, G.R. and Co., Aiken, SC . Savannah River Lab.)

    1989-01-01

    The protection of worker health and safety is of paramount concern at the Savannah River Site. Since the site is one of the largest nuclear sites in the nation, radiation safety is a key element in the protection program. This report is a compendium of the results in 1988 of the programs at the Savannah River Plant and the Savannah River Laboratory to protect the radiological health of employees. By any measure, the radiation protection performance at this site in 1988 was the best since the beginning of operations. This accomplishment was made possible by the commitment and support at all levels of the organizations to reduce radiation exposures to ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable). The report provides detailed information about the radiation doses received by departments and work groups within these organizations. It also includes exposure data for recent years to allow Plant and Laboratory units to track the effectiveness of their ALARA efforts. Many of the successful practices and methods that reduced radiation exposure are described. A new goal for personnel contamination cases has been established for 1989. Only through continual and innovative efforts to minimize exposures can the goals be met. The radiation protection goals for 1989 and previous years are included in the report. 27 figs., 58 tabs.

  10. November 10, 2004: First hydrogen refueling station opens in Washington,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DC. | Department of Energy 0, 2004: First hydrogen refueling station opens in Washington, DC. November 10, 2004: First hydrogen refueling station opens in Washington, DC. November 10, 2004: First hydrogen refueling station opens in Washington, DC. November 10, 2004 Secretary Abraham joins representatives of Shell and General Motors in the opening of the nation's first integrated gasoline/hydrogen refueling station in Washington, D.C. The station will be used to refuel General Motors' fuel

  11. Spotlight on Seattle, Washington: Community Partnerships Work to Extend

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Program Reach | Department of Energy Seattle, Washington: Community Partnerships Work to Extend Program Reach Spotlight on Seattle, Washington: Community Partnerships Work to Extend Program Reach Spotlight on Seattle, Washington: Community Partnerships Work to Extend Program Reach, as posted on the U.S. Department of Energy's Better Buildings Neighborhood Program website. PDF icon Spotlight on Seattle, Washington More Documents & Publications Seattle Summary of Reported Data Better

  12. Washington Recovery Act State Memo | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Washington Recovery Act State Memo Washington Recovery Act State Memo Washington State has substantial natural resources, including biomass, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric power. The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA)is making a meaningful down payment on the nation's energy and environmental future. The Recovery Act investments in Washington are supporting a broad range of clean energy projects from energy efficiency and the smart grid to wind, biomass, and geothermal, as well

  13. Making the Grade: Washington School District Invest in Energy Efficiency |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy the Grade: Washington School District Invest in Energy Efficiency Making the Grade: Washington School District Invest in Energy Efficiency September 10, 2015 - 11:55am Addthis As part of the Better Buildings Challenge, Camas School District in Washington not only surpassed its energy efficiency goals, but did so five years early. | Photo courtesy of Camas School District. As part of the Better Buildings Challenge, Camas School District in Washington not only surpassed

  14. Washington School District Makes the Grade in Energy Efficiency |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Washington School District Makes the Grade in Energy Efficiency Washington School District Makes the Grade in Energy Efficiency September 2, 2015 - 10:01am Addthis As part of the Better Buildings Challenge, Camas School District in Washington not only surpassed its energy efficiency goals, but did so five years early. | Photo courtesy of Camas School District. As part of the Better Buildings Challenge, Camas School District in Washington not only surpassed its energy

  15. Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Transportation Data for

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

    Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Washington Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels

  16. EIS-0522: Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery, Yakima Basin Coho Project; Kittitas County, Washington

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing an EIS that analyzes the potential environmental impacts of constructing and operating a proposed hatchery for coho salmon. BPA’s proposed action is to fund the Confederated Tribes of the Yakama Nation construction of a hatchery on 50 acres of land owned by the Yakama Nation in Kittitas County, Washington. Hatchery operations would include collection of adult coho for broodstock at the existing Roza and Sunnyside dams, incubation and rearing of up to 200,000 juvenile coho salmon, and release of smolts into the Yakima and Naches Rivers.

  17. July 2015 Groundwater Sampling at the Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site October 2015 LMS/SHE/S00715 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DVP-July 2015, Sherwood, Washington October 2015 RIN 15077204 Page i Contents Sampling Event Summary ...............................................................................................................1 Sherwood, Washington, Disposal Site, Sample Location Map .......................................................3 Data Assessment Summary

  18. Washington: Integrated Transportation Programs & Coordinated Regional

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Planning | Department of Energy Integrated Transportation Programs & Coordinated Regional Planning Washington: Integrated Transportation Programs & Coordinated Regional Planning November 6, 2013 - 5:42pm Addthis The Thurston Regional Planning Council (TRPC) developed the Thurston "Here to There" program as a project designed to reduce vehicle miles traveled. The program was a coordinated set of activities with one goal: to improve access to travel options for the people who

  19. Recovery Act State Memos Washington, DC

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Washington, DC For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION

  20. DOE Challenge Home, Washington Program Requirements

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DOE Challenge Home Washington Program Requirements 9-1-2013 To qualify as a DOE Challenge Home, a home shall meet the minimum requirements specified below, be verified and field-tested in accordance with HERS Standards by an approved verifier, and meet all applicable codes. Builders may meet the requirements of either the Performance Path or the Prescriptive path to qualify a home. 1 Single family detached and attached dwelling units, and dwelling units in multifamily buildings with 3 stories

  1. From The Washington Post's Federal Diary:

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    The Washington Post's Federal Diary: Merit Pay in a Nuclear Test Project By Stephen Barr Friday, March 28, 2008; D04 The agency that maintains the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile is undertaking a five-year project to overhaul pay practices so it will be more competitive in hiring scientists, engineers and other professionals. Under the pilot project, the National Nuclear Security Administration will leave the government-wide pay system -- the 15-grade General Schedule -- and replace it with

  2. Department.,of Energy Washington; DC'

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ,of Energy Washington; DC' 20585 JAN 1 1 1995 / .,, .- L ., The Honorable Thomas Menino ', 1 City Hall Square Boston, Massachusetts 02201 ,'. " p' ifi.. ' . .' b I,' \ Dear.Mayor.Me$ino: DOE's Formerly Util,ized for identification of sites.used by*DOEfs predecessor' agencies, determining, their current radiological condition and, where it has authority, performing remedial action to cleanup sites to meet current radiologicalprotection requirements.~ A conservative set of.technical

  3. Protection Programming Defensive Planning for Fixed Facilities

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE STD-1207-2012 December 2012 DOE STANDARD Protection Program Defensive Planning For Fixed Facilities U.S. Department of Energy AREA SANS Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE STD-1207-2012 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ii DOE STD-1207-2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS

  4. Protective Force Contingency Planning Technical Standard

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1213-2014 July 2014 DOE HANDBOOK PROTECTIVE FORCE CONTINGENCY PLANNING TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This page intentionally left blank. DOE-STD-1213-2014 i CONTENTS FOREWORD .............................................................................................................................v 1. INTRODUCTION

  5. Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman's Remarks to the Washington Institute for

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Near East Policy | Department of Energy to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman's Remarks to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy March 17, 2010 - 1:04pm Addthis U.S. Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman Remarks as Prepared for Delivery Washington Institute for Near East Policy Washington, D.C. March 17, 2010 Good afternoon. I would like to thank Rob Satloff and the Washington Institute for inviting me to speak with you today. For 25

  6. CX-007978: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  7. CX-009689: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. CX-009671: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Demolition and Disposal of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-009672: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Relocation of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  10. CX-009673: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  11. CX-009691: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  12. CX-009690: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-009686: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  14. CX-009674: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Actions to Conserve Energy or Water CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. CX-009682: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Asbestos Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  16. CX-009676: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-009687: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-009680: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Cleanup Actions CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-009688: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  20. CX-009678: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Workplace Enhancements CX(s) Applied: B2.1 Date: 12/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-009683: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Tanks and Equipment to Control Runoff and Spills CX(s) Applied: B1.6 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. CX-009684: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Outdoor Tests and Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  3. CX-009675: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Oil Spill Cleanup CX(s) Applied: B5.6 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  4. CX-009695: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Small-Scale Mercury Spill Cleanup CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  5. material protection

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    %2A en Office of Weapons Material Protection http:www.nnsa.energy.govaboutusourprogramsnonproliferationprogramofficesinternationalmaterialprotectionandcooperation-1

  6. material protection

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    %2A en Office of Weapons Material Protection http:nnsa.energy.govaboutusourprogramsnonproliferationprogramofficesinternationalmaterialprotectionandcooperation-1

  7. Risk and Performance Analyses Supporting Closure of WMA C at the Hanford Site in Southeast Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eberlein, Susan J.; Bergeron, Marcel P.; Kemp, Christopher J.; Hildebrand, R. Douglas; Aly, Alaa; Kozak, Matthew; Mehta, Sunil; Connelly, Michael

    2013-11-11

    The Office of River Protection under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is pursuing closure of the Single-Shell Tank (SST) Waste Management Area (WMA) C as stipulated by the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (HFFACO) under federal requirements and work tasks will be done under the State-approved closure plans and permits. An initial step in meeting the regulatory requirements is to develop a baseline risk assessment representing current conditions based on available characterization data and information collected at the WMA C location. The baseline risk assessment will be supporting a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) Field Investigation (RFI)/Corrective Measures Study (CMS) for WMA closure and RCRA corrective action. Complying with the HFFACO conditions also involves developing a long-term closure Performance Assessment (PA) that evaluates human health and environmental impacts resulting from radionuclide inventories in residual wastes remaining in WMA C tanks and ancillary equipment. This PA is being developed to meet the requirements necessary for closure authorization under DOE Order 435.1 and Washington State Hazardous Waste Management Act. To meet the HFFACO conditions, the long-term closure risk analysis will include an evaluation of human health and environmental impacts from hazardous chemical inventories along with other performance Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Appropriate and Applicable Requirements (CERCLA ARARs) in residual wastes left in WMA C facilities after retrieval and removal. This closure risk analysis is needed to needed to comply with the requirements for permitted closure. Progress to date in developing a baseline risk assessment of WMA C has involved aspects of an evaluation of soil characterization and groundwater monitoring data collected as a part of the RFI/CMS and RCRA monitoring. Developing the long-term performance assessment aspects has involved the construction of detailed numerical models of WMA C using the Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases (STOMP©) computer code, the development of a technical approach for abstraction of a range of representative STOMP© simulations into a system-level model based on the GoldSim© system-level model software.The STOMP©-based models will be used to evaluate local-scale impacts and closed facility performance over a sufficient range of simulations to allow for development of the system-level model of the WMA C. The GoldSim©-based system-level model will be used to evaluate overall sensitivity of modeled parameters and the estimate the uncertainty in potential future impacts from a closed WMA C facility.

  8. Retrieval of Tenth Single-shell Tank Complete at Hanford's Office of River

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Protection | Department of Energy Tenth Single-shell Tank Complete at Hanford's Office of River Protection Retrieval of Tenth Single-shell Tank Complete at Hanford's Office of River Protection December 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis EM’s Office of River Protection has successfully removed waste from a tenth storage tank at the Hanford site. Located in C Farm, C-109 is one of 16 underground tanks ranging in capacity from 55,000 to 530,000 gallons. EM's Office of River Protection has

  9. Grays River Watershed and Biological Assessment, 2006 Final Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    May, Christopher; Geist, David

    2007-04-01

    The Grays River Watershed and Biological Assessment was funded to address degradation and loss of spawning habitat for chum salmon (Onchorhynchus keta) and fall Chinook salmon (Onchoryhnchus tshawytscha). In 1999, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed lower Columbia River chum salmon as a threatened Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The Grays River watershed is one of two remaining significant chum salmon spawning locations in this ESU. Runs of Grays River chum and Chinook salmon have declined significantly during the past century, largely because of damage to spawning habitat associated with timber harvest and agriculture in the watershed. In addition, approximately 20-25% of the then-remaining chum salmon spawning habitat was lost during a 1999 channel avulsion that destroyed an important artificial spawning channel operated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Although the lack of stable, high-quality spawning habitat is considered the primary physical limitation on Grays River chum salmon production today, few data are available to guide watershed management and channel restoration activities. The objectives of the Grays River Watershed and Biological Assessment project were to (1) perform a comprehensive watershed and biological analysis, including hydrologic, geomorphic, and ecological assessments; (2) develop a prioritized list of actions that protect and restore critical chum and Chinook salmon spawning habitat in the Grays River based on comprehensive geomorphic, hydrologic, and stream channel assessments; and (3) gain a better understanding of chum and Chinook salmon habitat requirements and survival within the lower Columbia River and the Grays River. The watershed-based approach to river ecosystem restoration relies on a conceptual framework that describes general relationships between natural landscape characteristics, watershed-scale habitat-forming processes, aquatic habitat conditions, and biological integrity. In addition, human land-use impacts are factored into the conceptual model because they can alter habitat quality and can disrupt natural habitat forming processes. In this model (Figure S.1), aquatic habitat--both instream and riparian--is viewed as the link between watershed conditions and biologic responses. Based on this conceptual model, assessment of habitat loss and the resultant declines in salmonid populations can be conducted by relating current and historical (e.g., natural) habitat conditions to salmonid utilization, diversity, and abundance. In addition, assessing disrupted ecosystem functions and processes within the watershed can aid in identifying the causes of habitat change and the associated decline in biological integrity. In this same way, restoration, enhancement, and conservation projects can be identified and prioritized. A watershed assessment is primarily a landscape-scale evaluation of current watershed conditions and the associated hydrogeomorphic riverine processes. The watershed assessment conducted for this project focused on watershed processes that form and maintain salmonid habitat. Landscape metrics describing the level of human alteration of natural ecosystem attributes were used as indicators of water quality, hydrology, channel geomorphology, instream habitat, and biotic integrity. Ecological (watershed) processes are related to and can be predicted based on specific aspects of spatial pattern. This study evaluated the hydrologic regime, sediment delivery regime, and riparian condition of the sub-watersheds that comprise the upper Grays River watershed relative to their natural range of conditions. Analyses relied primarily on available geographic information system (GIS) data describing landscape characteristics such as climate, vegetation type and maturity, geology and soils, topography, land use, and road density. In addition to watershed-scale landscape characteristics, the study area was also evaluated on the riparian scale, with appropriate landscape variables analyzed within riparian buffers around each stream or river channel. Included in the overall watershed assessment are field habitat surveys and analyses of the physical and hydrological characteristics of primary chum and fall Chinook salmon spawning areas and spawning habitat availability and use. This assessment is a significant step in a comprehensive program to ensure the survival and recovery of Columbia River chum salmon in its most productive system and builds on existing recovery planning efforts for these ESA-listed salmonids within the Grays River and the lower Columbia River. This assessment also provides a basis for the recovery of other fish species in the Grays River, including coho salmon, winter steelhead, coastal cutthroat trout, and Pacific lamprey.

  10. Digging Begins at Hazardous Hanford Burial Ground- River Corridor Contractor Spent Two Years Preparing to Remediate 618-10

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, WASH. — After careful preparation and characterization, the Department of Energy’s (DOE) River Corridor contractor, Washington Closure Hanford, has begun remediation of one of the most hazardous burial grounds tackled to date on the Hanford Site’s River Corridor.

  11. Award Fee Determination Scorecard Contractor: Centerra-Savannah River Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Award Fee Determination Scorecard Contractor: Centerra-Savannah River Site Contract: Protective Force Security Services Contract Number: DE-AC30-10CC60025 Award Period: October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015 Basis of Evaluation: Award Fee Plan The contractor is required to provide, operate and maintain an armed and uniformed protective force for the physical protection of United States Department of Energy (DOE) security interests and other such related duties at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The

  12. Title 36 CFR 297 Wild and Scenic Rivers | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Abstract Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides for the protection of the free-flowing, scenic, and natural values of rivers designated as components or potential...

  13. Title 36 C.F.R. 297 Wild and Scenic Rivers | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Abstract Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides for the protection of the free-flowing, scenic, and natural values of rivers designated as components or potential...

  14. Role of slope stability in cumulative impact assessment of hydropower development: North Cascades, Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lee, R.R.; Staub, W.P.

    1993-08-01

    Two environmental assessments considered the potential cumulative environmental impacts resulting from the development of eight proposed hydropower projects in the Nooksack River Basin and 11 proposed projects in the Skagit River Basin, North Cascades, Washington, respectively. While not identified as a target resource, slope stability and the alteration of sediment supply to creeks and river mainstems significantly affect other resources. The slope stability assessment emphasized the potential for cumulative impacts under disturbed conditions (e.g., road construction and timber harvesting) and a landslide-induced pipeline rupture scenario. In the case of small-scale slides, the sluicing action of ruptured pipeline water on the fresh landslide scarp was found to be capable of eroding significantly more material than the original landslide. For large-scale landslides, sluiced material was found to be a small increment of the original landslide. These results predicted that hypothetical accidental pipeline rupture by small-scale landslides may result in potential cumulative impacts for 12 of the 19 projects with pending license applications in both river basins. 5 refs., 2 tabs.

  15. Hanford Grows Young Minds Through Site Tours | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Grows Young Minds Through Site Tours Hanford Grows Young Minds Through Site Tours June 3, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis John Britton, with Office of River Protection contractor Washington River Protection Solutions, explains the Hanford tank waste program to Western Washington University students in a recent tour of the Hanford site. John Britton, with Office of River Protection contractor Washington River Protection Solutions, explains the Hanford tank waste program to Western Washington University

  16. The 1983 Temperature Gradient and Heat Flow Drilling Project for the State of Washington

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Korosec, Michael A.

    1983-11-01

    During the Summer of 1983, the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources carried out a three-hole drilling program to collect temperature gradient and heat flow information near potential geothermal resource target areas. The project was part of the state-coupled US Department of Energy Geothermal Program. Richardson Well Drilling of Tacoma, Washington was subcontracted through the State to perform the work. The general locations of the project areas are shown in figure 1. The first hole, DNR 83-1, was located within the Green River valley northwest of Mount St. Helens. This site is near the Green River Soda Springs and along the projection of the Mount St. Helens--Elk Lake seismic zone. The other two holes were drilled near Mount Baker. Hole DNR 83-3 was sited about 1/4 km west of the Baker Hot Springs, 10.5 km east of Mount Baker, while hole DNR 83-5 was located along Rocky Creek in the Sulphur Creek Valley. The Rocky Creek hole is about 10 km south-southwest of the peak. Two other holes, DNR 83-2 and DNR 83-4, were located on the north side of the Sulphur Creek Valley. Both holes were abandoned at early stages of drilling because of deep overburden and severe caving problems. The sites were apparently located atop old landslide deposits.

  17. Washington: Battery Manufacturer Brings Material Production Home |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Battery Manufacturer Brings Material Production Home Washington: Battery Manufacturer Brings Material Production Home November 8, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis EnerG2, supported by American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds from EERE, built a new plant to produce nano-engineered carbon materials for batteries and other energy storage devices that can be used in hybrid, electric, plug-in hybrid, and all-electric vehicles. EnerG2's proprietary Carbon Technology Platform

  18. National Press Club Washington, D.C.

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Is the Energy Race our new "Sputnik" Moment? National Press Club Washington, D.C. 29 November, 2010 1 October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union placed a 184 pound satellite into orbit. "The Soviet Union now has - in the combined category of scientists and engineers - a greater number than the United States. And it is producing graduates in these fields at a much faster rate ... This trend is disturbing. Indeed, according to my scientific advisers, this is for the American people the most

  19. Mr. Todd Sellmer Washington TRU Solutions LLC

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    '<uCL.EAR REGULATORY COMM!S.s;O'- 'NA3H1NGTON :::: C 20555-C0i!' August C' 2009 Mr. Todd Sellmer Washington TRU Solutions LLC P.O Box 2078 Carlsbad. NM 88221 SUBJECT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO 9218 FOR THE MODEL NO TRUPACT- " PACKAGE Dear Mr Sellmer' As requested by your application on behalf of the Department of Energy (DOE) dated July 2 ~ 2009. enclosed is Certificate of Compliance No. 9218. RevIsion No. 20, for the Model No TRUPACT-II package. Changes made to the enclosed

  20. Assessing the Thermal Environmental Impacts of an Groundwater Heat Pump in Southeastern Washington State

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Freedman, Vicky L.; Waichler, Scott R.; Mackley, Rob D.; Horner, Jacob A.

    2012-04-01

    A thermal analysis of a large-scale (e.g., 1900 gpm), open-loop ground source heat pump (GSHP) installed on the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) campus in southeastern Washington State has been performed using a numerical modeling approach. Water temperature increases at the upgradient extraction wells in the system and at the downgradient Columbia River are potential concerns, especially since heat rejection to the subsurface will occur year-round. Hence, thermal impacts of the open-loop GSHP were investigated to identify operational scenarios that minimized downgradient environmental impacts at the river, and upgradient temperature drift at the production wells. Simulations examined the sensitivity of the system to variations in pumping rates and injected water temperatures, as well as to hydraulic conductivity estimates of the aquifer. Results demonstrated that both downgradient and upgradient thermal impacts were more sensitive to injection flow rates than estimates of hydraulic conductivity. Higher injection rates at lower temperatures resulted in higher temperature increases at the extraction wells but lower increases at the river. Conversely, lower pumping rates and higher injected water temperatures resulted in a smaller temperature increase at the extraction wells, but higher increases at the river. The scenario with lower pumping rates is operationally more efficient, but does increase the likelihood of a thermal plume discharging into the Columbia River. However, this impact would be mitigated by mixing within the hyporheic zone and the Columbia River. The impact under current operational conditions is negligible, but future increases in heat rejection could require a compromise between maximizing operational efficiency and minimizing temperature increases at the shoreline.

  1. protective force

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ntex%20-%20protective%20force%20-%20edited.jpg" alt"successfully completed a recent assessment by the U.S. Department " >

    Members of Pantex's Protective Force on...

  2. Hydroelectric power provides a cheap source of electricity with few carbon emissions. Yet, reservoirs are not operated sustainably, which we define as meeting societal needs for water and power while protecting long-term health of the river ecosystem. Reservoirs that generate hydropower are typically operated with the goal of maximizing energy reve

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jager, Yetta; Smith, Brennan T

    2008-02-01

    Hydroelectric power provides a cheap source of electricity with few carbon emissions. Yet, reservoirs are not operated sustainably, which we define as meeting societal needs for water and power while protecting long-term health of the river ecosystem. Reservoirs that generate hydropower are typically operated with the goal of maximizing energy revenue, while meeting other legal water requirements. Reservoir optimization schemes used in practice do not seek flow regimes that maximize aquatic ecosystem health. Here, we review optimization studies that considered environmental goals in one of three approaches. The first approach seeks flow regimes that maximize hydropower generation, while satisfying legal requirements, including environmental (or minimum) flows. Solutions from this approach are often used in practice to operate hydropower projects. In the second approach, flow releases from a dam are timed to meet water quality constraints on dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature and nutrients. In the third approach, flow releases are timed to improve the health of fish populations. We conclude by suggesting three steps for bringing multi-objective reservoir operation closer to the goal of ecological sustainability: (1) conduct research to identify which features of flow variation are essential for river health and to quantify these relationships, (2) develop valuation methods to assess the total value of river health and (3) develop optimal control softwares that combine water balance modelling with models that predict ecosystem responses to flow.

  3. Protections: Sampling

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Protections: Sampling Protections: Sampling Protection #3: Sampling for known and unexpected contaminants August 1, 2013 Monitoring stormwater in Los Alamos Canyon Monitoring stormwater in Los Alamos Canyon The Environmental Sampling Board, a key piece of the Strategy, ensures that LANL collects relevant and appropriate data to answer questions about the protection of human and environmental health, and to satisfy regulatory requirements. LANL must demonstrate the data are technically justified

  4. Washington DC's First Electric Vehicle Charging Station | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy DC's First Electric Vehicle Charging Station Washington DC's First Electric Vehicle Charging Station November 17, 2010 - 11:28am Addthis Street signage for Washington, DC's first electric vehicle charging station located on the northwest corner of the intersection of U and 14th streets. | Department of Energy Photo | Street signage for Washington, DC's first electric vehicle charging station located on the northwest corner of the intersection of U and 14th streets. | Department of

  5. Secretary Chu's Remarks as Prepared for Delivery at the Washington

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    University Commencement | Department of Energy as Prepared for Delivery at the Washington University Commencement Secretary Chu's Remarks as Prepared for Delivery at the Washington University Commencement May 21, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Remarks of Secretary Steven Chu- As Prepared for Delivery Washington University Friday, May 21, 2010 Chancellor Mark Wrighton, the Board of Trustees, faculty, family, and friends here today, thank you for letting me share this wonderful day with you. It is a

  6. Proceedings of the National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap Workshop: Washington,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DC; April 2-3, 2002 | Department of Energy National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap Workshop: Washington, DC; April 2-3, 2002 Proceedings of the National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap Workshop: Washington, DC; April 2-3, 2002 Summary of the Proceedings of the National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap Workshop held April 2-3, 2002 in Washington, DC. PDF icon The Hydrogen Roadmap Workshop Proceedings More Documents & Publications Proceedings of the Hydrogen Vision Meeting Proceedings of the Technology Roadmap

  7. DOE Cites Washington TRU Solutions for Nuclear Safety Violations |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy TRU Solutions for Nuclear Safety Violations DOE Cites Washington TRU Solutions for Nuclear Safety Violations December 22, 2005 - 4:53pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Department of Energy (DOE) today notified Washington TRU Solutions (WTS) that it will fine the company $192,500 for violations of the department's nuclear safety requirements. The Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) issued today cites a number of deficiencies that led to a series of low-level plutonium

  8. QER Public Meeting in Washington, DC: Enhancing Energy Infrastructure

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities | Department of Energy Washington, DC: Enhancing Energy Infrastructure Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities QER Public Meeting in Washington, DC: Enhancing Energy Infrastructure Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities Meeting Date and Location: April 11, 2014 10:00 A.M.. to 5:00 P.M.. EST United States Capitol Visitors Center, Congressional Auditorium, East Capitol Street, N.E. and First Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20001 Meeting Information

  9. December 15-16, 2015 - Technical Exchange Meeting - Richland, Washington |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy December 15-16, 2015 - Technical Exchange Meeting - Richland, Washington December 15-16, 2015 - Technical Exchange Meeting - Richland, Washington Annual Technical Exchange Meeting, December 15 and 16, 2015, Washington State Department of Ecology Offices, Richland, WA. Theme: Interpretation of Performance and Risk Assessment Results. Optional Tour of the Hanford Site for registered participants of the Technical Exchange Meeting, December 17, 2015. Contact

  10. Bioenergy Technologies Office Judges Washington State University Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Competition | Department of Energy Judges Washington State University Energy Competition Bioenergy Technologies Office Judges Washington State University Energy Competition May 27, 2014 - 9:39am Addthis Washington State University is hosting the Imagine Tomorrow competition to challenge high school students to explore new ways to support the transition to alternative energy sources. The competition, held on May 30-June 1, 2014, asks students to work together in teams to research topics

  11. SEP Success Story: Washington State Becomes Largest Public Consumer of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Biodiesel | Department of Energy Washington State Becomes Largest Public Consumer of Biodiesel SEP Success Story: Washington State Becomes Largest Public Consumer of Biodiesel December 14, 2011 - 11:34am Addthis Auto and passenger ferries operated by the Washington State Transportation Department shuttle more than 11 million people across the Puget Sound every year. Now, the electric-diesel engines that propel these vessels are powered by a blend of soy-based biodiesel and petroleum diesel.

  12. State of Washington Clean Energy Opportunity: Technical Market Potential

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    for CHP, August 2010 | Department of Energy of Washington Clean Energy Opportunity: Technical Market Potential for CHP, August 2010 State of Washington Clean Energy Opportunity: Technical Market Potential for CHP, August 2010 The State of Washington has significant clean energy technical market potential including clean heat and power (CHP)/cogeneration, waste heat recovery for power and heat, and district energy. This brief white paper by the Northwest Clean Energy Application Center (NW

  13. Climate Action Champions: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DC, MD, and VA | Department of Energy Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, DC, MD, and VA Climate Action Champions: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, DC, MD, and VA The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) is an independent, nonprofit association that brings area leaders together to address major regional issues in the District of Columbia, suburban Maryland, and Northern Virginia. COG and its member governments seek to create a more accessible,

  14. Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects Manager Helps Washington County Develop Energy Efficiency Projects August 11, 2010 - 1:01pm Addthis An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager for Kitsap County, Washington, and the energy efficient windows framed behind her. | Photo courtesy of Kitsap County, WA | An Energy Department grant funded Autumn Salamack's new job as resource conservation manager

  15. Harold Washington Social Security Administration (SSA) Center Water

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Conservation and Green Energy | Department of Energy Harold Washington Social Security Administration (SSA) Center Water Conservation and Green Energy Harold Washington Social Security Administration (SSA) Center Water Conservation and Green Energy Fact sheet describes the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) success story on environmental stewardship and cost savings at the Harold Washington Social Security Administration Center in Chicago,

  16. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington, D.C. | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Washington, D.C. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington, D.C. Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington, D.C. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD January 20, 2016 CX-100456 Categorical Exclusion Determination Creating a Multimedia Solar Knowledge Library Award Number: DE-FOA-0001329 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 01/20/2016 Location(s): DC Office(s): Golden Field Office January 19, 2016 CX-100452 Categorical

  17. Washington State Energy-Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program (SEEARP) Spurs

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Local Economy, Promotes State-Wide Partnership | Department of Energy Washington State Energy-Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program (SEEARP) Spurs Local Economy, Promotes State-Wide Partnership Washington State Energy-Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program (SEEARP) Spurs Local Economy, Promotes State-Wide Partnership April 18, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis As a result of funding provided from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, EERE was able to partner with the State of Washington to

  18. Utilities in California and Washington Receive Honors for Innovative Wind

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Deployment | Department of Energy Utilities in California and Washington Receive Honors for Innovative Wind Deployment Utilities in California and Washington Receive Honors for Innovative Wind Deployment August 22, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis EERE recognized utilities in California and Washington with the 2013 Public Power Wind award for outstanding efforts to accelerate the use of wind energy. Created in 2003 by the Department's Wind Powering America Initiative, the Public Power Wind award

  19. Washington University in St Louis | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in St Louis Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington University in St Louis Place: Missouri Product: University with large research departments, particularly medical....

  20. Washington County, Idaho: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Climate Zone Number 5 Climate Zone Subtype B. Places in Washington County, Idaho Cambridge, Idaho Midvale, Idaho Weiser, Idaho Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...