Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Federal Government Congressional Budget Office, Budget Analysis Division Washington, DC  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Washington, DC Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Government Congressional Budget Office, Budget Analysis Division Washington, DC Department Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation & Air Quality Ann Arbor, MI Federal Drug

Shyy, Wei

2

Map Locating Berkeley Lab Washington, DC Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE Map LEGEND: A:Berkeley Lab DC Office; PNNL; NREL; ORNL | B: EPA Waterside Mall C: Metrorail Station: Smithsonian | D: Metrorail Station: L'Enfant Plaza Notice: Due to security requirements in the building, all visitors to the Berkeley Lab DC Projects Office must check in at the ground floor entrance. If you do not have a DOE access badge, you will need to obtain a building visitor badge. To expedite this process, visitors are encouraged to RSVP to their meeting host or call (202) 488-2250 ahead of time. Metal detectors and x-ray screening of personal items are required for all visitors and staff entering the building. Directions to the Lab's Washington, DC Projects Office 901 D Street, SW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20024 Phone/Fax: (202) 488-2250

3

Bureau of Land Management - Washington Office Directories | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

p?titleBureauofLandManagement-WashingtonOfficeDirectories&oldid793278" Categories: References Geothermal References Solar References Utilities References Bulk Transmission...

4

BERAC Meeting March 9-11, 2011 Washington, DC | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

March 9-11, 2011 Washington, DC March 9-11, 2011 Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting March 9-11, 2011 Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting March 9-10, 2011 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (7KB) Presentations Warren Washington .pptx file (29.0MB), The Present and Future of Climate Modeling William Brinkman .pptx file (25.3MB), Office of Science Report Sharlene Weatherwax .pdf file (446KB), State of BER Report Paul Bryan .pptx file (2.4MB), Activities in DOE's Office of Biomass Programs Gary Geernaert .pptx file (8.3MB), Climate and Environmental Sciences

5

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Environmental Health and Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Environmental Health and Safety Design Guide Fire Protection Systems SCOPE. BACKGROUND The University is largely self-insured and believes fire protection significantly reduces its risk protection in many occupancies but fire protection is not required in Group B occupancy buildings. Class B

Wilcock, William

6

DOE's Offices of Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statement of Intent (SOI) Statement of Intent (SOI) between the US Dept of Energy (DOE) and the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) on decommissioning and waste management was renewed for a further five years during the Waste Management conference in Phoenix, AZ in March. The signatories to the SOI were the DOE's Offices of Environmental Management (EM) and Nuclear Energy (NE) and the NDA, with NE being a new addition to the arrangement. The Office of Environment Management is responsible for the clean-up of the former nuclear weapons' sites and the relationship between them and the NDA has already resulted in collaboration in a number of areas such as thermal treatments for stabilization of wastes, plutonium management, aging facilities management, non-standard fuels

7

BERAC Meeting, February 16-17, 2012, Washington, DC| U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

February 16-17, 2012, Washington, DC February 16-17, 2012, Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting, February 16-17, 2012, Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting February 16-17, 2012 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (25KB) Presentations William Brinkman, Comments from the Director, Office of Science .pdf file (24.4MB) Sharlene Weatherwax, State of BER Report .pdf file (4.3MB) Eddy Rubin, Joint Genome Institute Update .ppt file (18.0MB) Allison Campbell, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) Update .pdf file (17.8MB) Adam Arkin, Knowledgebase Discussion .pdf file (8.9MB)

8

BERAC Meeting April 25-26, 2002 Washington, DC | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

25-26, 2002 Washington, DC 25-26, 2002 Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting April 25-26, 2002 Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting April 25-26, 2002 Washington DC Agenda .pdf file (6KB) Available Presentations James Decker .ppt file (22.1MB), Principal Deputy Director, Office of Science Rod Brown .ppt file (70KB), Deputy Undersecretary for Research, Education and Economics, USDA Ari Patrinos .ppt file (64KB), Associate Director for Biological & Environmental Research Dick Swaja .ppt file (74KB), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and

9

NREL: Energy Analysis - Washington D.C. Office Staff  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington D.C. Office Washington D.C. Office The following SEAC staff are based in our Washington D.C. Office. They support a variety of programs and activities, and often are the liaison between the U.S. Department of Energy and staff based in Golden, Colorado. Team Lead: Margaret Mann (Golden) Administrative Support: JoAnn Weaver (Golden) Thomas Jenkin Austin Brown David J. Feldman Tom Schneider Robert Margolis Kathleen Nawaz Monisha Shah Photo of Austin Brown. Austin Brown Senior Analyst (Strategic Planning) Areas of expertise Crosscutting low-carbon strategies Clean transportation technologies and policies Primary research interests Clean energy research portfolio planning Energy and society Sustainable transportation systems More information on Austin Brown Photo of David J. Feldman

10

Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington , DC 20585 September 20, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY AND PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM : SUBJECT: PAULBOSCO~~ - SENIOR PROCUhM~ OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOSEPH F. WADDELL SENIOR PROCUREMENT NNSA OFFICE OF ACQ SITION MANAGEMENT Acquisition Savings Reporting Template Guidance The Department is continuing to make progress in its efforts to support the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acquisition Savings Initiative, as well as the Department's Strategic Sourcing Program. After using our current reporting template for the past year, it was a good time to review the process and make adjustments where necessary. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has also noted in an audit that

11

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF EM Recovery NEWS FLASH RECOVERY.GOV March 10, 2011 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Payments Surge Past $4 Billion U.S. Depar tment of Energy | Office of Environmental Management For More Information on EM Recovery Act Work, Visit Us on the Web: http://www.em.doe.gov/emrecovery/ FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS * More than $4 BILLION in Recovery Act payments are accelerating environmental cleanup * 67% of EM Recovery Act funds have been paid Financial data are based on reporting as of March 9, 2011, and are subject to change. EM has made more than $4 billion in Recovery Act payments, or 32 percent of the DOE's $12.4 billion in Recovery Act payments. DOE received $35.2 billion

12

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Hazardous Materials Environmental Health & Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Hazardous Materials Environmental Health & Safety Design Guide Fluorescent are hazardous waste, so take care to ensure the tubes remain intact during removal and storage. Fluorescent

Wilcock, William

13

Office of Environmental Management Perspective  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office of Environmental Management May 16, 2013 www.energy.govEM 2 * Jim Hutton * Don Rack * Craig Scott * Terry Tracy * Tony Weadock * Ed Westbrook EM-42 WP&C SMEs...

14

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Management Program Plan October 2013 FY 2014 to 2024 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OREM III Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Program Plan FY 2014 to 2024 October 2013...

15

United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, D. C. 20460 United States) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. The United States Department of the Army (Army) and the United they determine the geographic jurisdictional scope of waters of the United States for purposes of section 404

US Army Corps of Engineers

16

The Environmental Studies MAJOR The George Washington University  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Geol 3193 Environmental Law 3 Amst 2520-1 American Architecture 3 Anth 3502 Cultural Ecology 3 AnthThe Environmental Studies MAJOR The George Washington University To declare as an Environmental-8523 Program Advisor Prof. Melissa Keeley, keeley@gwu.edu, (202) 994-7156 Environmental Studies majors must

Vertes, Akos

17

Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COVER SHEET 1 COVER SHEET 1 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office 2 3 TITLE: 4 Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact 5 Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) 6 7 CONTACT: 8 For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (800) 426-4914 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act process, contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

18

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COVER SHEET COVER SHEET U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286F) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (509) 376-6536 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

19

DOE Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Management Environmental Management Project and Contract Management Improvement Timeline Improving DOE contract and project management is a top priority of the Department's senior management and entire organization. The DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) has put in place a "Roadmap" for Journey to Excellence that sets specific performance expectations for continuous improvements in contract and project management. Following are some highlights of EM's improvement actions over the past five years. In 2006, the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) began a study of EM, which included acquisition and project management among its key focus areas. The resultant report from the study,

20

EIS-0205: Joint NEPA/SEPA Final Environmental Impact Statement Washington Windplant No. 1, Goldendale, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Bonneville Power Administration prepared this statement in order to fulfill its National Environmental Policy Act obligations ahead of signing an agreement with the utilities that would purchase the Windplant’s power from KENETECH. KENETECH Windpower, Inc., proposes to construct and operate Washington Windplant No. 1 in the Columbia Hills area, southeast of Goldendale, in Klickitat County, Washington.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Independent Oversight Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Environmental Management Headquarters - November 2012 November 2012 Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management...

22

Office of Environmental Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management F Reactor Inspection 351 Substation Demolition -- B Roll Hanford F Reactor Inspection B-roll footage Energy Secretary...

23

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Hazardous Materials Environmental Health & Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Construction projects which impact existing building materials must include an environmental consultant air pollution control agency and the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) at least ten (10) daysUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Hazardous Materials Environmental Health & Safety Design Guide Asbestos

Wilcock, William

24

Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Link to Main Report Link to Main Report RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: COVER SHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (800) 426-4914 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act process,

25

Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Management Visits Hanford - First Visit, Commemorates Completion of Major Recovery Act Project Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Management Visits Hanford - First Visit, Commemorates Completion of Major Recovery Act Project August 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree, DOE Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov 509-376-4171 Media visit requirements to be completed by 2 p.m. today: This visit requires badges and an RSVP by 2 p.m. today by email to tmbirch@wch-rcc.com at Washington Closure Hanford. You must include in your email (for badging purposes) your full name exactly as it appears on your driver's license, confirm you are a U.S. Citizen, your date of birth, as well as the name, address, and phone number of the company you are

26

Environmental Assessment K Pool 'Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOERA-1 11 1 DOERA-1 11 1 Environmental Assessment K Pool 'Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Emrgy Richland, Washington December 1996 DOEEA-1111 ENVIRONMJ3'NTAL ASSESSMENT K POOL 'F'ISH REARING HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RICHLAND, WASHINGTON December 1996 This page intentionally left blank. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 ' U.S. Department of Energy summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has a need to respond to a request to lease facilities at the Hanford Site 100-KE and 100-KW filter plant pools (K Pools) for fish rearing activities. These fish rearing activities would be: (1) business ventures with public h

27

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

AND RADIATION R. Paul Detwiler, Acting Manager Carlsbad Field Office U.S.Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221-3090 Dear Dr. Detwiler: The U.S. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency (EPA) received

28

University of Washington Environmental Health and Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Responsibility 4. Safety Coordinator B. Fundamentals For All Work-Sites: 8 Keys 1. New Employee Health and Safety work-sites, the Department of Environmental Health & Safety (EH&S) has written this guide to help you the process of determining which health and safety risks are unique to your work setting. Ultimately, you

Wilcock, William

29

Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Environmental Management Overview Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview More...

30

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Office of Environmental Management.

31

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection's Cambria Office  

High Performance Buildings Database

Ebensburg, PA The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection's second green office building, Cambria, has more green features and a higher level of environmental awareness than PA DEP's first building--the South Central Regional Office Building. This 36,000 ft2 facility, designed for approximately 125 occupants, has collected data and documented many facets of its green design initiatives.

32

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This website highlights activities that support the mission of the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (Oak Ridge Office of EM), which is to remove environmental legacies resulting from more than 60 years of nuclear weapons development and government-sponsored nuclear energy and scientific research.

33

SFCD Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for Future Development in Proximity to the William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment July 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1958 Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a multi-program U.S. Department of Energy- Office of Science (DOE-SC) national laboratory conducting research to meet DOE strategic objectives. To enable continued research support, DOE-SC is proposing to construct new facilities and infrastructure

34

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, conducted August 18 through September 5, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Hanford Site. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Hanford Site, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey team developed a Sampling and Analysis Plan to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during its on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory or a support contractor. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the Environmental Survey Interim Report for the Hanford Site. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the Hanford Site Survey. 44 refs., 88 figs., 74 tabs.

Not Available

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Final Environmental Assessment for the Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

562 562 Environmental Assessment Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 Final January 2007 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1562 Environmental Assessment S-1 January 2007 Summary Introduction. This Environmental Assessment (EA) provides information and analyses of proposed U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities associated with constructing and operating a new Physical Sciences Facility (PSF) complex on DOE property located in Benton County, north of Richland, Washington. The proposed PSF would replace a number of existing research laboratories in the Hanford

36

The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management's Budget Allocation Plan, OAS-L-12-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The Department of Energy's Office The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management's Budget Allocation Plan OAS-L-12-03 March 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 15, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SENIOR ADVISOR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FROM: Daniel M. Weeber, Director Eastern Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management's Budget Allocation Plan" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management is tasked with managing the technically challenging risks posed by the world's largest nuclear cleanup effort. At the end of Fiscal Year 2010, EM had responsibility for nuclear cleanup activities at 18 sites covering more

37

SFCD Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Draft Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for Future Development on the South Federal Campus, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Richland, Washington 99352 May 2013 DOE/EA-1958 U.S. Department of Energy DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment May 2013 DOE/EA-1958 U.S. Department of Energy DRAFT Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a multi-program U.S. Department of Energy- Office of Science (DOE-SC) national laboratory conducting research to meet DOE strategic objectives. To enable continued research support, DOE-SC is proposing to construct new facilities and infrastructure

38

Letter: Transition of Closure Sites from the Office of Environmental...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Transition of Closure Sites from the Office of Environmental Management to other DOE Organizations Letter: Transition of Closure Sites from the Office of Environmental Management...

39

Office of Environmental Management's Hanford Site Awards $99M...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Environmental Management's Hanford Site Awards 99M Contract to Small Business Office of Environmental Management's Hanford Site Awards 99M Contract to Small Business...

40

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Pursues Vision of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office of Environmental Management Pursues Vision of Future While Remembering Past Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Pursues Vision of Future While Remembering Past...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board The...

42

Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 5, 2011 December 5, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIAL OFFICERS AND HEADS OF FIELD ORGANIZATIONS FROM: SUBJECT: !~::o~~~ral Cou;;(} '/-- Reminder Regarding Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) Planning Summaries Early involvement by senior management in the NEP A planning process is a key component of a successful NEP A compliance program. Thus, Department of Energy (DOE) Order 451.1 B requires that each Secretarial Officer and Head of a Field Organization submit an annual NEP A planning summary to the General Counsel by January 31 of each year and make it available to the public. Preparation of these summaries helps ensure that NEP A activities are aligned with program priorities and that resources are allocated to enable timely completion ofNEPA

43

Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington Prepared by: Benton County, Washington Bonneville Power Administration (DOE/EIS 0345) June 2003 Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility To: People Interested in the Plymouth Generating Facility Enclosed is the Final EIS for the Plymouth Generating Facility. The Draft EIS was published in August 2002, and comments were received through October 5, 2002. The Final EIS contains revisions to the Draft EIS and our responses to public and agency comments on the Draft EIS. This letter briefly describes the Final EIS, outlines our next steps, and tells how to contact us if you have questions. The Final EIS is abbreviated, consisting of an updated summary and project description

44

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus Mark Whitney Manager Oak Ridge, TN May 16, 2013 www.energy.govEM 2 EM Program Overview ETTP ORNL...

45

Washington Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Regions Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Washington Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Washington Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your school's state, county, city, or district.

46

Washington Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Regions Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Washington Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Washington Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

47

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Carnegie Institute of Washington Dept  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Carnegie Institute of Washington Carnegie Institute of Washington Dept of Genetics - NY 0-07 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Carnegie Institute of Washington (Dept. of Genetics) (NY.0-07 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cold Spring Harbor , New York NY.0-07-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-07-1 Site Operations: This site served as a meeting place on June 25, 1942 for the 'Executive Committee of S-1,' a group comprised of various military and academic personnel. Discussions took place regarding what contracts should be extended beyond July 1, 1942 for scientific and other technical work done for the U.S. Government. NY.0-07-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated NY.0-07-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated

48

Office of Environmental Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages

Environmental Management Environmental Management Search Search form Search Office of Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management Services Services Home Waste Management Waste Management Home Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration Site & Facility Restoration Home Deactivation & Decommissioning (D&D) Facility Engineering Soil & Groundwater Sustainability Program Management Program Management Home Safety Security Quality Assurance Budget & Performance Acquisition Compliance Project Management Communication & Engagement Communication & Engagement Home Intergovernmental Programs EMAB EM SSAB Tribal Programs International Programs Long-Term Stewardship Community Involvement Fund

49

BERAC Meeting April 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting April 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting April 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (8KB) Presentations Teresa Fryberger .ppt file (5.9MB), Director, Environmental Remediation Sciences Division, Division and Draft Strategic Plan Overview Anna Palmisano .ppt file (16.6MB), Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research Program Update Roland Hirsch .ppt file (740KB), Environmental Management Science Program Bill Rogers .ppt file (10.6MB), Environmental Molecular Sciences

50

Bioenergy Technologies Office Judges Washington State University Energy Competition  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Washington State University is hosting the Imagine Tomorrow competition to challenge high school students to explore new ways to support the transition to alternative energy sources. The competition, held on May 30–June 1, 2014, asks students to work together in teams to research topics related to biofuels, technology, behavior, or design.

51

Office of Risk Management Environmental Health Services  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Office of Risk Management Environmental Health Services 141 General Services Fort Collins, Colorado Provost and Director Colorado State University Extension From: Sally Alexander Environmental Health facility or jail; 3. a dangerous condition of any public building; 4. a dangerous condition of a public

52

BERAC Meeting December 5-6, 2005 Washington, DC| U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

5-6, 2005 Washington, DC 5-6, 2005 Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting December 5-6, 2005 Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting December 5-6, 2005 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (14KB) Presentations Mike Kuperberg .ppt file (68KB) and Andy Felmy .ppt file (9.8MB), EMSL Update: Reviews, Action Plan & Progress Ari Patrinos .ppt file (80KB), State of BER Warren Washington .ppt file (152KB), Discussion of the TCCRP subcommittee Report George Sgouros .pdf file (42KB), SNM, Public Comment Dan Hitchcock .ppt file (848KB), Dinner Talk, High Performance Computing

53

Energy Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station Install Solar Panels, Improve Efficiency, and Cut Monthly Energy Use Nearly 30% Energy Office Grant Helps the...

54

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019 This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (ORO-EM) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review involved evaluation of established IVR processes and implementation of the newly revised documented safety analysis (DSA) and technical safety

55

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 19, 2011 January 19, 2011 CX-005033: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oil Cleanup in 100-NR-2 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 19, 2011 CX-005032: Categorical Exclusion Determination Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility Ventilation System Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 13, 2011 CX-005034: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provide Power to Existing River Discharge and Monitoring System, 331 Facility, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/13/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

56

Environmental Health & Safety Office of Radiological Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Environmental Health & Safety Office of Radiological Safety Page 1 of 2 FORM LU-1 Revision 01 1 safety training and submit this registration to the LSO prior to use of Class 3B or 4 lasers. A copy will be returned to the Laser Supervisor to be filed in the Laboratory Laser Safety Notebook. Both the Laser

Houston, Paul L.

57

Office of Biological and Environmental Research  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Underlying Assumption for (Low Dose) Dosimetry: "If the spatial and temporal distribution of energy Program U.S. Department of Energy Radiation Dosimetry Standardization Workshop NCI / NIAID / NIST September 15 -16, 2011 #12;U.S. Department of Energy · Office of Science · Biological and Environmental

58

BERAC Meeting December 3-4, 2002 Washington, DC | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

3-4, 2002 Washington, DC 3-4, 2002 Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting December 3-4, 2002 Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting December 3-4, 2002 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (6KB) Presentations Genomes to Life Facilities Marvin Frazier, DOE .ppt file (5.0MB), User Facilities for 21st Century Systems Biology Eric Ackerman, PNNL .ppt file (1.9MB), Facility I: Production and Characterization of Proteins Michelle Buchanan, ORNL .ppt file (4.3MB), Facility II: Whole Proteome Analysis Lee Makowski, ANL .ppt file (8.5MB), Characterization and Imaging of

59

BERAC Meeting July 10-11, 2006 Washington, DC | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

July 10-11, 2006 Washington, DC July 10-11, 2006 Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting July 10-11, 2006 Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting July 10-11, 2006 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (14KB) Presentations James Tiedje .ppt file (123KB), Discussion of Final Report of the BERAC Review of the JGI Jim Bristow .ppt file (2.8MB), JGI, Progress in addressing BERAC Recommendations Jeff Gaffney .pdf file (6.6MB), ANL, Reconfigured Atmospheric Science Program and the 2006 Mexico City Campaign David Thomassen .ppt file (119KB), State of BER Mike Kuperberg .ppt file (9.8MB), Introduction to EMSL

60

BERAC Meeting November 29-30, 2007 Washington, DC | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

November 29-30, 2007 Washington, DC November 29-30, 2007 Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting November 29-30, 2007 Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting November 29-30, 2007 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (9KB) Presentations BER Updates on BERAC Reports Jeff Amthor .ppt file (11.5MB), Free Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Report Bob Vallario .ppt file (749KB), Integrated Assessment Program Report David Thomassen .ppt file (651KB), Climate Change Committee of Visitors Report Update on BERAC Charges Jim Adelstein .ppt file (785KB), Low Dose Program Review

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

BERAC Meeting November 13-14, 2003 Washington, DC | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

13-14, 2003 Washington, DC 13-14, 2003 Washington, DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting November 13-14, 2003 Washington, DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting November 13-14, 2003 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (12KB) Presentations Mark Humayun .ppt file (8.4MB), The Artificial Retina Project Chris Stubbs .ppt file (10.7MB), Computational Aspects of Medical Imaging Pat Dehmer .ppt file (34.2MB), Nanoscience and Hydrogen Initiatives Jim Mahoney .ppt file (761KB), The U.S. Climate Change Science Program: Strategic Planning to Implementation David Conover .ppt file (573KB), U.S. Climate Change Technology Program

62

BERAC Meeting April 20-21, 2005 Washington DC | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

April 20-21, 2005 Washington DC April 20-21, 2005 Washington DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting April 20-21, 2005 Washington DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting April 20-21, 2005 Washington DC Agenda .pdf file (15KB) Presentations Ray Orbach .ppt file (134KB), Advancing Energy, Economic and National Security... Dave Bader .ppt file (36KB), Subcommittee Report on the Need for Enhanced Research on Cloud Parameterization Methods... Peter Lunn .ppt file (215KB), Status Report on Restructuring of Aerosol Research Program Jerry Elwood .ppt file (552KB), New Charge to Review Terrestrial Carbon

63

BERAC Meeting April 29-30, 2004 Washington DC | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

29-30, 2004 Washington DC 29-30, 2004 Washington DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting April 29-30, 2004 Washington DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting April 29-30, 2004 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (15KB) Presentations Ray Orbach .ppt file (1.5MB) Ari Patrinos .ppt file (72.2MB), The State of BER Jill Banfield .ppt file (20.5MB), Structure, Reactivity, and Behavior of Nanoparticles in the Environment Steve Larson .ppt file (420KB), Radiopharmaceutical Subcommittee Report Joel Parriott/Bill Valdez .ppt file (710KB), Program Plans and Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Roadmaps

64

UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November November 8, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: JOHN BERRY \ (\ .~ .. (t"t-..~ DIRECTOR \~Ii" \"'b' ~ U Subject:ModelStrategiesfor RQitment andHiringof PeoplewithDisabilitiesas Required UnderExecutiveOrder 13548 On July 26,2010, President Obama issued Executive Order (EO) 13548, which directs Executive departments and agencies (agencies) to improve their efforts to employ Federal workers with disabilities and targeted disabilities through increased recruitment, hiring, and retention of these individuals. OPM, in consultation with the White House, the Department of Labor (DOL), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), has developed, as required by the EO, model recruitment and hiring strategies for agencies to use to increase their employment of people with disabilities.

65

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Environmental Management - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Implementation...

66

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 16, 2009 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Kittitas Valley Wind Project September 15, 2009 EIS-0312: Record of Decision Washington-Action Agency Estuary Habitat Memorandum of Agreement

67

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16, 2010 16, 2010 CX-003457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sidewall Coring of Single-Shell Tank 241-A-106 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.11 Date: 08/16/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office August 13, 2010 CX-004960: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boeing Research and Technology -Low-Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/13/2010 Location(s): Kent, Washington Office(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy August 12, 2010 CX-003624: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replacement of Twenty 22-L Structures on the Satsop-Aberdeen Number 2 230-kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/12/2010 Location(s): Gray's Harbor County, Washington

68

Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance - Mission and Functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environmental Policy and Assistance (HS-22) Environmental Policy and Assistance (HS-22) Reports to the Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis Mission The Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance establishes environmental protection policy, requirements and expectations for the Department to ensure that the environment is adequately protected from hazards associated with DOE environmental risks and impacts are minimized and compliant with environmental protection laws, regulations and standards are achieved. The Office works proactively with headquarters and field offices to foster continuous improvement and shape behavior in environmental protection before incidents occur. The Office serves as a corporate technical assistance, coordination, and integration resource to support line organizations in the resolution of environmental issues and management concerns. In addition, the Office provides high-quality, customer-oriented assistance that enables improved DOE program and field implementation of environmental protection.

69

Office of Environmental Management's Hanford Site Awards $99M Contract to  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Management's Hanford Site Awards $99M Environmental Management's Hanford Site Awards $99M Contract to Small Business Office of Environmental Management's Hanford Site Awards $99M Contract to Small Business Small businesses are the backbone of our economy, employing half of all workers in America and creating two out of every three new jobs in the U.S. The Office of Environmental Management's Hanford Site awarded a $99 million contract (approximate value) to a minority-owned, women-owned, certified small business. The HPM Corporation of Kennewick, Washington, will provide Occupational Medical Services for the nearly 8,000 employees who work for Hanford Site contractors, Energy Department Offices, and others working at the Hanford Site. HPM Corporation, founded in 2001, will be responsible for operating and

70

Office of Legacy Management Significant Environmental Aspects  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9/2013 9/2013 Office of Legacy Management Significant Environmental Aspects The mission of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is to safely manage DOE's postclosure responsibilities and ensure the future protection of human health and the environment. We have evaluated all of our activities for their potential impact on the environment, and we have identified those aspects that could have a significant impact if they were not controlled. This information is used to develop programs to prevent or mitigate potential impacts and to establish prioritized goals, objectives, and targets for continually improving performance. Our significant environmental aspects fall into four categories: * Waste generation and minimization

71

Office of Environmental Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management EM Newsletter - 2013 Accomplishments Issue Vol. 5, Issue 12, December 2013 Read more EM Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Team's Holiday Spirit Shines Children in the Carlsbad area are warmer this holiday season thanks to the generosity of EM's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant team of employees. Read more EM's Budget Proposal EM's Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request Read more SRS Waste Tanks 5 and 6 Are Operationally Closed Savannah River Remediation (SRR), the liquid waste contractor at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), has removed from service two more Cold War-era liquid radioactive waste tanks. Read more Energy Department Completes K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Building Demolition The five year demolition project was completed ahead of schedule and all

72

Office of Environmental Management | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office of Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management EM's Budget Proposal EM's Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request Read more EM Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Team's Holiday Spirit Shines Children in the Carlsbad area are warmer this holiday season thanks to the generosity of EM's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant team of employees. Read more EM Newsletter Vol. 5, Issue 12, December 2013 Read more SRS Waste Tanks 5 and 6 Are Operationally Closed Savannah River Remediation (SRR), the liquid waste contractor at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), has removed from service two more Cold War-era liquid radioactive waste tanks. Read more Energy Department Completes K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Building Demolition The five year demolition project was completed ahead of schedule and all debris shipments are expected to be completed in spring 2014.

73

Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments conducts assessments to provide critical feedback and objective information on programs and performance in protecting our workers, the public and environment from radiological hazards with a focus on hazardous nuclear facilities and operations. This information provides assurance to our stakeholders and identifies areas for improvement to our leadership to support the safe performance of the Department’s mission.

74

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 13, 2010 October 13, 2010 CX-004253: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northwest Natural Devine Road Land Use Review Request CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 13, 2010 CX-004252: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Two Broken Transformers Near the Roza Dam Adult Trap Facility CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460) October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement (Appendices) Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460), Washington Comments and responses to DEIS-0456: Cushman Hydroelectric Project.

75

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2011 2, 2011 EA-1858: Mitigation Action Plan Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project May 1, 2011 EA-1679: Preliminary Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Powerplant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington April 28, 2011 CX-005892: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia River Inter-Tidal Fish Commission Use of White Bluffs Boat Launch and Hanford Town Boat Ramp for Salmon Tagging CX(s) Applied: B3.8 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 26, 2011 CX-005891: Categorical Exclusion Determination 200 Area Tank Farm Interim Surface Barriers CX(s) Applied: B6.9 Date: 04/26/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington

76

Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management: Historically Black  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management: Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management: Historically Black Colleges and Universities July 2009 Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management: Historically Black Colleges and Universities July 2009 A presentation at the 10th Annual Small Business Conference and Expo, given by the Office of Environmental Management, to share information about the Office of Environmental Management and ways small businesses can help them meet their goals. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management: Historically Black Colleges and Universities July 2009 More Documents & Publications Recovery Act Exceeds Major Cleanup Milestone, DOE Complex Now 74 Percent Remediated Office of Environmental Management: A Journey to Excellence Regional Small Business Summit Material

77

Washington,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DC 20585 December 20, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT FROM: William S. Maharay Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act" Audit Report No.: OAS-L-06-04 We reviewed selected aspects of the Department.of Energy's (Department) implementation of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982. FMFIA requires that agencies establish management control and financial systems to provide reasonable assurance that the integrity of Federal programs and operations is protected. Furthermore, it requires that the head of the agency provide an annual assurance statement on whether the agency has met this

78

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 22, 2011 CX-006255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indian Cabin Road Repair Date: 06/22/2011 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

79

HAZARD CATEGORIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION SITES AT HANFORD WASHINGTON  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Environmental restoration activities, defined here as work to identify and characterize contaminated sites and then contain, treat, remove or dispose of the contamination, now comprises a significant fraction of work in the DOE complex. As with any other DOE activity, a safety analysis must be in place prior to commencing restoration. The rigor and depth of this safety analysis is in part determined by the site's hazard category. This category in turn is determined by the facility's hazardous material inventory and the consequences of its release. Progressively more complicated safety analyses are needed as a facility's hazard category increases from radiological to hazard category three (significant local releases) to hazard category two (significant on-site releases). Thus, a facility's hazard category plays a crucial early role in helping to determine the level of effort devoted to analysis of the facility's individual hazards. Improper determination of the category can result in either an inadequate safety analysis in the case of underestimation of the hazard category, or an unnecessarily cumbersome analysis in the case of overestimation. Contaminated sites have been successfully categorized and safely restored or remediated at the former DOE production site at Hanford, Washington. This paper discusses various means used to categorize former plutonium production or support sites at Hanford. Both preliminary and final hazard categorization is discussed. The importance of the preliminary (initial) hazard categorization in guiding further DOE involvement and approval of the safety analyses is discussed. Compliance to DOE direction provided in ''Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports'', DOE-STD-1027-92, is discussed. DOE recently issued 10 CFR 830, Subpart B which codifies previous DOE safety analysis guidance and orders. The impact of 10 CFR 830, Subpart B on hazard categorization is also discussed.

BISHOP, G.E.

2001-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0189-FEIS-Summary-1996.HTM[6/27/2011 11:21:59 AM] The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to analyze the potential environmental impacts of their proposed actions to assist them in making informed decisions. A similar Washington State law, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), requires State agencies, including the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), to analyze environmental impacts before making decisions that could impact the environment. A major emphasis of both laws is to promote public awareness of these actions and provide opportunities for public involvement. Because NEPA and SEPA requirements are similar, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Ecology

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support & Corporate Safety Analysis Mission The Office of Environmental, Sustainability and Operational Analysis establishes environmental protection requirements and expectations for the Department to ensure protection of workers and the public and protection of the environment from the hazards associated with all Department operations. The Office provides assistance to field elements in implementation of policy and resolving environmental protection issues. The Office manages and promotes mission support programs and provides analysis of Department of Energy (DOE)-wide performance in protecting the public, the workers and the environment while performing the missions of

82

SAFETY AND THE Office of Environmental Health and Instructional Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SAFETY AND THE SUPERVISOR Office of Environmental Health and Instructional Safety #12;Safety to University safety, health, and environmental compliance strategies. Every employee is entitled to a safe standard practices, and administering your overall safety, health, and environmental responsibilities

de Lijser, Peter

83

ENVIRONMENTAL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

797 797 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE FOR THE AGUA CALIENTE SOLAR PROJECT IN YUMA COUNTY, ARIZONA U.S. Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program Office Washington, DC 20585 November 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary .................................................................................................................ES-1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................ES-1 Purpose and Need ...............................................................................................................ES-1 Proposed Action and Alternatives........................................................................................ES-2

84

Independent Oversight Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Management Headquarters - November 2012 Independent Oversight Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Management Headquarters - November 2012 November 2012 Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent assessment of the safety culture1 at the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) - Headquarters (EM-HQ). The primary objective of the evaluation was to provide information regarding the status of the safety culture at EM-HQ. The data collection phase of the assessment occurred in April and May 2012.

85

Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (October 18, 2011) Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (October 18, 2011) U.S. District Court's Order of October 18, 2011, in Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (D. Colo.). The Court has issued the injunctive relief described on pages 51-52 of the Order. U.S. District Court's Order of October 18, 2011, in Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (D. Colo.). More Documents & Publications Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (February 27, 2012)

86

Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (February 27, 2012) Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (February 27, 2012) U.S. District Court's Order of February 27, 2012, in Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (D. Colo.). U.S. District Court's Order of February 27, 2012, in Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (D. Colo.). More Documents & Publications Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Office of Legacy Management, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01624 (October 18, 2011) LG Electronics v. DOE - Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff LG

87

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office August 19, 2009 CX-000470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Purgewater Storage and Treatment Facility Unit #1 Closure CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/19/2009 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

88

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management | Department of...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Ambitious vision drives Oak Ridge's progress Ambitious vision drives Oak Ridge's progress In 2014, Oak Ridge's EM program made...

89

The Office of Environmental Management Celebrates 20 years (1989...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The Office of Environmental Management Celebrates 20 years (1989-2009) Work progresses rapidly on the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU). Click on image to enlarge With the...

90

Partnering Policy for the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

As we journey on the road to excellence, we have embraced seven goals to focus our energies on achieving the Office of Environmental Management (EM) vision.

91

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Decision Critical Technology Element U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Department of Energy Documented Safety Analysis U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental...

92

Line Management Perspective: Office of Environmental Management (EM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Matthew Moury, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Safety, Security and Quality Programs, Office of Environmental Management. EFCOG Integrated Safety Management Work Planning and Control.

93

Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control Webpage | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Control Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control Webpage Author State of Hawaii...

94

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2011 22, 2011 CX-006583: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along Portions of the Grand Coulee-Chief Joseph #1 and #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 22, 2011 CX-006580: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along the Grand Coulee-Okanogan #2 115-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 18, 2011 EA-1728: Draft Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 15, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site,

95

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington River Protection Solutions Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 September 2010 Participation in the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), participated in the review of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review for 2010. The review was conducted during the period of August 23 to September 2, 2010, and focused on six functional areas: corrective action management, work planning and control, radiological protection, environmental protection, emergency preparedness, and

96

Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support, and Corporate Safety Analysis  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support and Analysis establishes environmental protection requirements and expectations for the Department to ensure protection of workers and the public and protection of the environment from the hazards associated with all Department operations.

97

Biological and Environmental Research User Facilities | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

BER User Facilities BER User Facilities User Facilities ASCR User Facilities BES User Facilities BER User Facilities FES User Facilities HEP User Facilities NP User Facilities User Facilities Frequently Asked Questions User Facility Science Highlights Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 BER User Facilities Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Biological & Environmental Research program supports the operation of the following national scientific user facilities: William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL): External link The mission of the EMSL at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) External link in Richland, Washington, is to provide integrated experimental and

98

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28, 2011 28, 2011 EIS-0423: Final Environmental Impact Statement Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 28, 2011 CX-005134: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Yakama Nation for the Purchase of Three Parcels of Property Along Reecer Creek CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 01/28/2011 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 28, 2011 EIS-0423: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Long -Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 21, 2011 CX-005130: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ringold Substation Structure Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 01/21/2011 Location(s): Basin City, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

99

EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE STRATEGY FOR THE CLEANUP OF K BASINS AT HANFORD SITE WASHINGTON  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

K Basins, consisting of two water-filled storage basins (KW and KE) for spent nuclear fuel (SNF), are part of the 100-K Area of the Hanford Site, along the shoreline of the Columbia River, situated approximately 40 km (25 miles) northwest of the City of Richland, Washington. The KW contained 964 metric tons of SNF in sealed canisters and the KE contained 1152 metric tons of SNF under water in open canisters. The cladding on much of the fuel was damaged allowing the fuel to corrode and degrade during storage underwater. An estimated 1,700 cubic feet of sludge, containing radionuclides and sediments, have accumulated in the KE basin. Various alternatives for removing and processing the SNF, sludge, debris and water were originally evaluated, by USDOE (DOE), in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with a preferred alternative identified in the Record of Decision. The SNF, sludge, debris and water are ''hazardous substances'' under the Comprehensive, Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Leakage of radiologically contaminated water from one of the basins and subsequent detection of increased contamination in a down-gradient monitoring well helped to form the regulatory bases for cleanup action under CERCLA. The realization that actual or threatened release of hazardous substances from the waste sites and K Basins, if not addressed in a timely manner, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare and environment led to action under CERCLA, with EPA as the lead regulatory agency. Clean-up of the K Basins as a CERCLA site required SNF retrieval, processing, packaging, vacuum drying and transport to a vaulted storage facility for storage, in conformance with a quality assurance program approved by the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM). Excluding the facilities built for SNF drying and vaulted storage, the scope of CERCLA interim remedial action was limited to the removal of fuel, sludge, debris and water. At present, almost all of the spent fuel has been removed from the basins and other activities to remove sludge, debris and water are scheduled to be completed in 2007. Developing environmental documentation and obtaining regulatory approvals for a project which was initiated outside CERCLA and came under CERCLA during execution, was a significant priority to the successful completion of the SNF retrieval, transfer, drying, transport and storage of fuel, within the purview of strong conduct-of-operations culture associated with nuclear facilities. Environmental requirements promulgated in the state regulations by Washington Department of Public Health for radiation were recognized as ''applicable or relevant and appropriate.'' Effective implementation of the environmental compliance strategy in a project that transitioned to CERCLA became a significant challenge involving multiple contractors. This paper provides an overview of the development and implementation of an environmental permitting and surveillance strategy that enabled us to achieve full compliance in a challenging environment, with milestones and cost constraints, while meeting the high safety standards. The details of the strategy as to how continuous rapport with the regulators, facility operators and surveillance groups helped to avoid impacts on the clean-up schedule are discussed. Highlighted are the role of engineered controls, surveillance protocols and triggers for monitoring and reporting, and active administrative controls that were established for the control of emissions, water loss and transport of waste shipments, during the different phases of the project.

AMBALAM, T.

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 28, 2010 April 28, 2010 CX-002135: Categorical Exclusion Determination Barr-Tech - Green Waste To Renewable Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/28/2010 Location(s): Sprague, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 27, 2010 CX-002236: Categorical Exclusion Determination C-Farm Electrical, Lighting, and Walkway Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B2.1, B1.3 Date: 04/27/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 23, 2010 CX-002213: Categorical Exclusion Determination Spacer replacement along the Hanford-Wautoma #1 and #2 (substation to substation) transmission lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/23/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Office of Environmental Management FY 2011 Budget Request  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

on 20 Years of Cleanup Progress: on 20 Years of Cleanup Progress: Investments to sustain risk reduction and strengthen technology Office of Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management FY 2011 Budget Request FY 2011 Budget Request Dr. Inés Triay Dr. Inés Triay Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Office of Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management February 2010 Building on 20 Years of Cleanup Progress: Investments to sustain risk reduction and strengthen technology Chief Business Chief Technical Assistant Secretary Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary EM has embarked on a Journey to Excellence 2 Our Vision: "EM completes quality work safely, on schedule and within cost and delivers demonstrated value to the American taxpayer." Chief Business Officer

102

Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Plymouth Energy, L.L.C. (Plymouth Energy) proposes to construct and operate the Plymouth Generating Facility (PGF), which would be a 307-megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired, combined cycle power generation facility on a 44.5-acre site 2 miles west of the rural community of Plymouth in southern Benton County, Washington. Plymouth Energy has proposed that the PGF would be interconnected to the Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA's) proposed McNary-John Day 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line at a point approximately 4.7 miles west of BPA's McNary Substation. This tie-in to the McNary-John Day line would be approximately 0.6 mile to the north of the project site. Natural gas would be supplied to the project by an 800-foot pipeline lateral from the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline Company (Williams Co.) Plymouth Compressor Station, which is located adjacent to the plant site. Water for project use would be supplied from a groundwater well whose perfected rights have been transferred to the project. A small additional quantity of water to meet plant peak needs would be obtained by lease from the neighboring farm operation. Wastewater resulting from project operations would be supplied to the neighboring farm for blending with farm-supplied water, and then used for crop irrigation. Electricity generated by the PGF would be delivered to the BPA electric grid via a new transmission interconnection for transmission of energy to regional purchasers of electricity.

N /A

2003-06-20T23:59:59.000Z

103

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C. 20460  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to update the environmental protection standards for uranium mining because current regulations, promulgated monitoring networks at ISL uranium mines, including wells within the production area to compare post- and pre preliminary framework of considerations applicable to groundwater monitoring at ISL uranium mines

104

Expanded public notice: Washington State notice of intent for corrective action management unit, Hanford Environmental Restoration Disposal  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is to serve notice of the intent to operate an Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), adjacent to the 200 West Area of the Hanford Facility, Richland, Washington, as a Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU), in accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 264.552. The ERDF CAMU will serve as a management unit for the majority of waste (primarily soil) excavated during remediation of waste management sites on the Hanford Facility. Only waste that originates from the Hanford Facility can be accepted in this ERDF CAMU. The waste is expected to consist of dangerous waste, radioactive waste, and mixed waste. Mixed waste contains radioactive and dangerous components. The primary features of the ERDF could include the following: one or more trenches, rail and tractor/trailer container handling capability, railroads, an inventory control system, a decontamination building, and operational offices.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-006068: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 14, 2011 Massive Cement Pour into Hanford Site Nuclear Facility Underway: Recovery Act Funding Puts U Canyon in Home Stretch of Demolition Preparations RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford workers are pouring enough cement-like material to fill six Olympic-size swimming pools in one of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) largest nuclear facilities at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State to prepare the massive building for demolition. June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2

106

Energy' TEfl9 Associated Post Office Box 117  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Division Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20545 Subject: DRAFT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF PARCEL 1A ELZA GATE SITE,...

107

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 10, 2003 March 10, 2003 EIS-0330: Record of Decision Wallula-McNary Transmission Line Project and Wallula Power Project March 7, 2003 EA-1454: Finding of No Significant Impact Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and 100-N Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington March 6, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-128: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EA-1454: Final Environmental Assessment Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and

108

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

109

The Office of Environmental Management technical reports: a bibliography  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Environmental Management`s (EM) technical reports bibliography is an annual publication that contains information on scientific and technical reports sponsored by the Office of Environmental Management added to the Energy Science and Technology Database from July 1, 1995 through Sept. 30, 1996. This information is divided into the following categories: Focus Areas and Crosscutting Programs. Support Programs, Technology Integration and International Technology Exchange are now included in the General category. EM`s Office of Science and Technology sponsors this bibliography.

NONE

1997-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Mr. David Hemelright, Chair Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Post Office Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Dear Mr. Hemelright: July...

111

Department of Energy Environmental Management Office of Science and Technology  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management International Cooperative Program: Current Status and Plans for Expansion Office of Waste Processing Technical Exchange Denver, CO K. D. Gerdes and A. M. Han Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy and J. C. Marra*, K. M. Fox*, D. K. Peeler*, M. E. Smith*, G. T. Jannik*, E. B. Farfan*, D. S. Kim**, J. D. Vienna**, J. A. Roach***, A. S. Aloy+, S. V. Stefanovsky++, M. D. Bondarkov+++, D. B. Lopukh‡ and C. W. Kim‡‡ *Savannah River National Laboratory, **Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, ***Idaho National Laboratory, +Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia ++SIA Radon Institute, Moscow, Russia, +++International Radioecology Laboratory, Slavutych, Ukraine, ‡Electrotechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia,

112

Energy Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station Install Solar Panels, Improve Efficiency, and Cut Monthly Energy Use Nearly 30% (Fact Sheet), Energy Development in Island Nations, U.S. Virgin Islands (EDIN) Energy Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station Install Solar Panels, Improve Efficiency, and Cut Monthly Energy Use Nearly 30% (Fact Sheet), Energy Development in Island Nations, U.S. Virgin Islands (EDIN) This fact sheet highlights the energy challenges faced by the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station, the renewable energy and energy efficiency solutions implemented, the resulting energy efficiency savings, and other project benefits. 54376.pdf More Documents & Publications USVI Energy Road Map: Charting the Course to a Clean Energy Future

113

Office of Environmental Management Taps Small Business for Waste Isolation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Management Taps Small Business for Waste Environmental Management Taps Small Business for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contract Office of Environmental Management Taps Small Business for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Contract August 29, 2012 - 4:54pm Addthis A stratigraph of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's underground layers, where Transuranic waste is safely stored. A stratigraph of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's underground layers, where Transuranic waste is safely stored. John Hale III John Hale III Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization This week, Celeritex, LLC landed a contract worth up to $17.8 million with the Office of Environmental Management, having demonstrated through a competetive process that this small business is up to the task of securing and isolating defense-generated Transuranic waste.

114

The Office of Environmental Management technical reports: A bibliography  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Environmental Management`s (EM) technical reports bibliography is an annual publication that contains information on scientific and technical reports sponsored by the Office of Environmental Management added to the Energy Science and Technology Database from July 1, 1995--that were published from October 1, 1996--September 30, 1997. This information is divided into the following categories: Miscellaneous, Focus Areas and Crosscutting Programs, Support Programs, Technology Integration and International Technology Exchange, are now included in the Miscellaneous category. The Office of Environmental Management within the Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for environmental restoration, waste management, technology development and facility transition and management. Subjects include: subsurface contaminants; mixed waste characterization, treatment and disposal; radioactive tank waste remediation; plutonium; deactivation and decommissioning; robotics; characterization, monitoring, and sensor technology; and efficient separations. 880 refs.

NONE

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.

116

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 May 12, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: Nancy H. Sutley Chair SUBJECT: Emergencies and the National Environmental Policy Act With this Memorandum, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) reiterates its previous guidance on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review of proposed emergency response actions. [1] This memorandum clarifies that the previous guidance remains applicable to current situations and provides guidance on required agency environmental review. Agencies should distribute this guidance to field offices developing and taking actions in response to emergencies along with the agency's relevant guidance on emergency actions and NEPA.

117

Environmental assessment of SP-100 ground engineering system test site: Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to modify an existing reactor containment building (decommissioned Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor (PRTR) 309 Building) to provide ground test capability for the prototype SP-100 reactor. The 309 Building (Figure 1.1) is located in the 300 Area on the Hanford Site in Washington State. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that Federal agencies assess the potential impacts that their actions may have on the environment. This Environmental Assessment describes the consideration given to environmental impacts during reactor concept and test site selection, examines the environmental effects of the DOE proposal to ground test the nuclear subsystem, describes alternatives to the proposed action, and examines radiological risks of potential SP-100 use in space. 73 refs., 19 figs., 7 tabs.

Not Available

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Environmental Management Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Environmental Management June 19, 2012 - 2:45pm Addthis Large nuclear material processing tanks, like the one destined for Savannah River Site's (SRS) Salt Waste Processing Facility, will be managed with the support of qualified small businesses. Large nuclear material processing tanks, like the one destined for Savannah River Site's (SRS) Salt Waste Processing Facility, will be managed with the support of qualified small businesses. Dot Harris Dot Harris The Honorable Dot Harris, Director, Office of Economic Impact and Diversity Today the Energy Department announced contract awards to seven small-disadvantaged businesses to perform critical technical

119

Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Environmental Management Seven Small Businesses Awarded Contracts by the Office of Environmental Management June 19, 2012 - 2:45pm Addthis Large nuclear material processing tanks, like the one destined for Savannah River Site's (SRS) Salt Waste Processing Facility, will be managed with the support of qualified small businesses. Large nuclear material processing tanks, like the one destined for Savannah River Site's (SRS) Salt Waste Processing Facility, will be managed with the support of qualified small businesses. Dot Harris Dot Harris The Honorable Dot Harris, Director, Office of Economic Impact and Diversity Today the Energy Department announced contract awards to seven small-disadvantaged businesses to perform critical technical

120

Final environmental impact statement, Washington Water Power/B.C. Hydro Transmission Interconnection Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Washington Water Power (WWP) proposes to construct and operate an electric transmission line that would connect with the electrical system of the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (B.C. Hydro). The project would be composed of a double-circuit, 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line from WWP`s existing Beacon Substation located northeast of Spokane, Washington to the international border located northwest of Metaline Falls, Washington. The original Presidential permit application and associated proposed route presented in the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) have been modified to terminate at the Beacon Substation, instead of WWP`s initially proposed termination point at the planned Marshall Substation located southwest of Spokane. A supplemental draft EIS was prepared and submitted for review to not only examine the new proposed 5.6 miles of route, but to also compare the new Proposed Route to the other alternatives previously analyzed in the DEIS. This final EIS (FEIS) assesses the environmental effects of the proposed transmission line through construction, operation, maintenance, and abandonment activities and addresses the impacts associated with the Proposed Action, Eastern Alternative, Western Alternative, Northern Crossover Alternative, Southern Crossover Alternative, and No Action Alternative. The FEIS also contains the comments received and the responses to these comments submitted on the DEIS and Supplemental DEIS.

Not Available

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Office of Environmental Management: A Journey to Excellence  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Office of Environmental Management: A Journey to Excellence Cynthia Anderson Chief Operations Officer Office of Environmental Management May 11, 2011 Presented to: National Transportation Stakeholders Forum www.em.doe.gov 2 Goal 3: Complete the disposition of 90% of the legacy transuranic waste by 2015. Goal 2: Reduce the life cycle costs and accelerate the cleanup of the Cold War environmental legacy. Goal 1: Complete the three major tank waste projects within the current approved baselines. Goal 4: Reduce the EM legacy footprint by 40% by the end of 2011, leading to approximately 90% reduction by 2015. Goal 5: Improve safety, security and quality assurance towards a goal of zero accidents, incidents, and defects. Goal 6: Improve contract and project

122

Hawaii Department of Health Office of Environmental Quality Control | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Office of Environmental Quality Control Office of Environmental Quality Control Jump to: navigation, search Name Hawaii Department of Health Office of Environmental Quality Control Address 235 S. Beretania Suite 702 Place Honolulu, Hawaii Zip 96813 Website http://hawaii.gov/health/envir Coordinates 21.3094485°, -157.8578603° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":21.3094485,"lon":-157.8578603,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

123

Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Policy Technical Position NSEP-TP-2007- 1, Technical Position on the Requirement in DOE 0 420.1B to Use National Consensus Industry Standards and the Model Building CodesTechnical Position NS Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Policy Technical Position NSEP-TP-2007- 1, Technical Position on the Requirement in DOE 0 420.1B to Use National Consensus Industry Standards and the Model Building CodesTechnical Position NS All new construction required to follow the provisions of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 420. lB, Facility Safety, must comply with national consensus industry standards and the model building codes applicable for the state or region in which the facility is located. Certain individuals in the fire community requested

124

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 25, 2010 January 25, 2010 EIS-0391: Updated Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 13, 2010 CX-000471: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Prescribed Burning on the Hanford Site During October, November, and December of 2010 to Maintain Critical Fire Breaks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 8, 2010 EIS-0391: Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 1, 2010 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan December 18, 2009 EIS-0391: Notice of Modification of Preferred Alternatives

125

Name: Intended quarter of entry: University of Washington Seattle | Office of Admissions | April 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Admission Information Admission to this major is competitive. Completion of prerequisites does not guarantee://www.cfr.washington.edu/academicPrograms/undergrad/bse/index.shtml The application form is available at: http://www.engr.washington.edu/curr_students/admissions/index.html Visit the general catalog for more

Manchak, John

126

Name: Intended quarter of entry: University of Washington Seattle | Office of Admissions | April 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the department website prior to applying: http://www.ce.washington.edu/prospective/undergrads/index.html. The application form is available at: http://www.engr.washington.edu/curr_students/admissions/index.html Visit for admission. Minimum 2.50 cumulative GPA for all courses required for admission. Completion of prerequisites

Manchak, John

127

Washington DC Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Washington DC Regions Washington DC Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov Middle School Regionals Washington DC Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Washington, DC Coaches can review the middle school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

128

Washington DC Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Washington DC Regions Washington DC Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2013 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: National.Science.Bowl@science.doe.gov High School Regionals Washington DC Regions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Washington, DC Coaches can review the high school regional locations listed below. Please note: Registrations are based on the location of your school. Please be sure to select the regional that is designated for your

129

BPA/Puget Power Northwest Washington Transmission Project : Summary of the Supplemental Draft Environmental Statement.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

BPA and Puget Sound Power and Light (Puget Power) are proposing to upgrade the existing electric transmission power system in the Whatcom and Skagit County area of northwest Washington to increase the capacity of the US-Canada Intertie transmission system. The project would satisfy the need to provide more ability to store and return energy with Canada, would provide additional capacity on the Intertie for anticipated increases in power transactions, and would increase flexibility in operation of the US and Canadian hydroelectric system. It would protect Puget Power`s local system against thermal overloads, and improve local reliability. In November 1993, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), and Whatcom County (Washington) published a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the proposed Northwest Washington Transmission Project. In order to present some shifts in need for the project and to permit additional review, BPA and Whatcom County have elected to issue a Supplemental Draft EIS. This Summary presents background material, explains project needs and purposes, and then focuses on alternatives and the possible effects.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Washington - WA 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington - WA 0-01 Washington - WA 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON (WA.0-01) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Seattle , Washington WA.0-01-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 WA.0-01-1 Site Operations: Research activities involving small quantities of radioactive materials in a controlled environment. WA.0-01-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for residual radioactive contamination considered remote - Operating under active NRC license WA.0-01-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated WA.0-01-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see

131

Confined Space Entry Millersville University -Office Of Environmental Health & Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to Life and Health (IDLH) atmosphere Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) Atmosphere: MaximumConfined Space Entry Millersville University - Office Of Environmental Health & Safety Scope of a chemical or other agent for which there is dose or permissible exposure limit · Any Immediately Dangerous

Hardy, Christopher R.

132

General Safety Office of Environmental Health and Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

General Safety Web Manual Office of Environmental Health and Safety April 2010 #12;#12;Contents Emergency Telephone Numbers and Procedures............................(Click for web link) - How to Report............................................(Click for web link) - Chancellor - Vice Chancellors - Department Heads - Supervisors, Foreman and Managers

133

Carlsbad Field Office Members Are DOE Judges at International Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Carlsbad Field Office Members Are DOE Judges at International Carlsbad Field Office Members Are DOE Judges at International Environmental Design Contest Carlsbad Field Office Members Are DOE Judges at International Environmental Design Contest April 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis California Polytechnic State University students test output from cyclone treatment at the 2012 WERC IEDC. California Polytechnic State University students test output from cyclone treatment at the 2012 WERC IEDC. Contestants from the University of Idaho think it through at the 2012 WERC IEDC. The annual competition includes college students from universities worldwide, who showcase their engineering design solutions. Their solutions are judged by industry and academic professionals. Contestants from the University of Idaho think it through at the 2012 WERC

134

Proposed Tenaska Washington II Generation Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 2: Public Involvement.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In regard to the proposed Tenaska Washington II Generation Project, the goal of the Bonneville Power Administration`s (BPA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) public involvement process is to determine the issues to be examined and pertinent analyses to be conducted and to solicit comments on the content and quality of information presented in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). Comments and questions are solicited from the public and government agencies during the scoping process and during the comment period and public hearing on the DEIS, to find out what is of most concern to them. The end product of the public involvement process is the Comment Report which follows in part of this volume on Public Involvement.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

Independent Oversight Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Management Headquarters- November 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters

136

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management- February 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019

137

Evolution and History of the Department of Energy and the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

An overview of the Evolution and History of the Department of Energy and the Office of Environmental Management.

138

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-007504: Categorical Exclusion Determination 300 Area Nanoscale Research and Development Projects CX(s) Applied: B3.15, A9, B3.6 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 1, 2011 EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Power plant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington November 18, 2011 Demolition Begins on Hanford's Historic Plutonium Vaults - Plutonium Finishing Plant on track to meet regulatory milestone RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) began demolishing a vault complex that once held stores of plutonium for the U.S. nuclear weapons

139

News From the D.C. Office: Energy-Saving Office Equipment Part 2  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. 3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. News From the D.C. Office Energy-Saving Office Equipment Part 2: Making the "Virtual Office" Real More on the DC Office efficiency up-grade: Lighting, Office Equipment: Part 1 Regular readers of the Center for Building Science News know that energy-efficient lighting and office equipment can have significant environmental and economic benefits. Previous articles ("Monitored Savings from Energy-Efficient Lighting in D.C. Office" [Spring 1997, p. 3] and "Energy-Saving Office equipment" [Summer 1997, p. 3]) discussed these features of Berkeley Lab's Washington, D.C. office. The D.C. office also serves as a demonstration site for telecommunications technologies, which have energy and environmental benefits of their own.

140

FY 2013 Budget Request Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM Mission 4 Office of Environmental Management Deactivate and decommission over 5,000 facilities Protect and clean up more than 10,000 groundwater and soil sites The EM Challenge: Cleaning Up Five Decades of Nuclear Research and Weapons Production 5 Disposition nearly 1.9 million cubic meters of radioactive waste (low level/mixed low level, transuranic, and high level waste) -- enough to fill over 750 Olympic-sized swimming pools Office of Environmental Management We work with some of the most dangerous substances known to humanity... Performing first-of-a-kind tasks in highly hazardous work environments Holding basin for spent nuclear fuel Workers using glovebox to handle plutonium

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DISTRIBUTIO DISTRIBUTIO FROM: DAE Y. CHUNG DEPUTY ASSISTA@SECRETARY FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS SUBJECT: Establishing the Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board The purpose of this memorandum is to introduce the Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance (QA) Corporate Board which implements EM'S policy and guidance and promotes lessons learned and best practices across the sites. The Corporate Board provides the management structure to integrate the independently managed federal and contractor QA Programs into a single corporate entity. The Board serves as a consensus-building body to facilitate institutionalization of a QA Management System across the EM-Complex. The Corporate Board concept originated from the EM Quality Improvement Initiative in

142

Washington: Washington's Clean Energy Resources and Economy (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document highlights the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's investments and impacts in the state of Washington.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006064: Categorical Exclusion Determination Actions to Conserve Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006089: Categorical Exclusion Determination

144

Safe interim storage of Hanford tank wastes, draft environmental impact statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Draft EIS is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). DOE and Ecology have identified the need to resolve near-term tank safety issues associated with Watchlist tanks as identified pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 101-510, Section 3137, ``Safety Measures for Waste Tanks at Hanford Nuclear Reservation,`` of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, while continuing to provide safe storage for other Hanford wastes. This would be an interim action pending other actions that could be taken to convert waste to a more stable form based on decisions resulting from the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) EIS. The purpose for this action is to resolve safety issues concerning the generation of unacceptable levels of hydrogen in two Watchlist tanks, 101-SY and 103-SY. Retrieving waste in dilute form from Tanks 101-SY and 103-SY, hydrogen-generating Watchlist double shell tanks (DSTs) in the 200 West Area, and storage in new tanks is the preferred alternative for resolution of the hydrogen safety issues.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Environmental Protection Agency Office of Small Business Programs  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Protection Agency Protection Agency Office of Small Business Programs www.epa.gov/osbp DOE Kansas City, Missouri May 11, 2011 Dr. Jeanette L. Brown, Director www.epa.gov/osbp 2 Follow the Money Getting to Green EPA and OSBP Mission * The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) mission is to protect human health and the environment. * The Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) supports EPA's mission by fostering opportunities for partnerships, contracts, sub-agreements, and grants for small and socioeconomically disadvantaged concerns, including their advocacy in EPA regulations & compliance. * OSBP's Green Initiative Task Force develops information, resources and tools to assist small business in going green. "Gaining Opportunities by Going Green"

146

EERE: Golden Field Office Public Reading Room - FINAL Environmental...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sk Skip to main content Menu Energy.gov Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Search Search form Search Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Office of Energy...

147

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-10 2-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Install wells and boreholes at the Old Rifle, CO, Processing Site A. Brief Project/Activity Description The Environmental Remediation Sciences Program (ERSP) proposes to install 36 wells and 5 boreholes on the Old Rifle, CO, Processing Site. A combination of 13 injection wells, 18 monitoring wells, 5 multi-chambered wells, and 5 boreholes would be installed using a sonic rotary drill rig. Five of the wells would be used for U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) groundwater monitoring purposes and the remainder (31 wells and 5 boreholes) would be installed in a single gallery (Super 8) to be used for research and monitoring

148

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JO-IO JO-IO U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist Project/Activity: Geophysical and Seismic Investigations at the Shoal, NY, Site A. Brief Project/Activity Descl'iption The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) needs to further characterize the water table, evaluate the prevailing horizontal groundwater flow direction, and identify faults/major fracture zones that may affect groundwater flow and contaminant transport at the Shoal Site. The Shoal Site is located about 40 miles by road from Fallon, in Churchill County, NY. This environmental checklist evaluates two related geophysical activities. The initial geophysical work would consist of conducting a controlled-source audio

149

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 23, 2010 November 23, 2010 CX-004464: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Area Radio Communications Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/01/2010 Location(s): Franklin County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2010 CX-004524: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington State University Building Upgrades and Resource Conservation Manager CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 19, 2010 CX-004525: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Services Corps CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Kitsap County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

150

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and...

151

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 15, 2010 March 15, 2010 CX-001180: Categorical Exclusion Determination Monroe-Custer Number 1 and 2 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line Structure 16/2 Access Road Improvement and Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 12, 2010 CX-006365: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Spokane CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Spokane, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-006364: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Pasco CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Pasco, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-001182: Categorical Exclusion Determination

152

EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), 6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration to fund the portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to wildlife habitat mitigation projects to be undertaken in a cooperative effort with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Finding of No Significant Impact Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic) July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Final Environmental Assessment Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic)

153

HYDROGEOMORPHIC CLASSIFICATION OF WASHINGTON STATE RIVERS TO SUPPORT EMERGING ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Seattle, Washington, USA b National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration, Northwest Fishery Sciences C. P. KONRADe,f and H. IMAKIb a School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington INTRODUCTION Societal dependence on freshwater ecosystems is increasing worldwide as growing human populations

Olden, Julian D.

154

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29-10 29-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Install monitoring wells at the Slick Rock West, Colorado, Processing Site A. Brief Project/Activity Description The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) proposes to abandon groundwater monitoring well 0318 and install three new groundwater monitoring wells at the Slick Rock West, Colorado, Processing Site. The attached map shows the well locations. Existing well 0318 would be replaced with well 0318A. The well would be abandoned because either the screen or casing has broken. Well 0318 has 3 feet (ft) of sand inside the casing and about 1 ft of water above the sand, and would be abandoned according to State of Colorado well

155

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25-10 25-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Reclamation Projects on Slick Rock Lease Tract C-SR-II, Uranium Leasing Program A. BriefProject/Activity Description The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) proposes various reclamation activities related to abandoned mines and mine features that constitute a public safety concern. Independent contractors associated with the lessee (Cotter Corporation) and under supervision of uranium leasing program (ULP) personnel would complete the work, and all projects would be completed within approximately 3 weeks. C-SR-ll is located in southwestern San Miguel County, Colorado. The total estimated surface disturbance would cover 3 acres.

156

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I.D. # LM 27-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Reclamation Projects in Lease Tract C-G-26, Uranium Leasing Program A. Brief Proj ect/ Activity Description The U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) proposes to reclaim mining features associated with abandoned mines inherited by LM as a result of realigning lease tract boundaries in 2007. The activities include closing mine portals, filling subsided areas, and closing shafts and vents. Independent contractors associated with Energy Fuels Resources, the leaseholder, would complete all work in an estimated 1 week in 2010. The presence of these features constitute a public and wildlife safety concern. This

157

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Reclamation Projects on Wedding Bell Mountain Lease Tract C-WM-17, Uranium Leasing Program A. BriefProject/Activity Description The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) proposes several minor reclamation activities related to abandoned mines and mine features that pose a public safety concern. In 2007, LM inherited abandoned mines as a result of re-aligning lease tract boundaries.1pdependent contractors associated with the lessee (Golden Eagle Uranium) and under the supervision of uranium leasing program personnel would complete the work, and all projects would be completed within approximately 2 days. The Wedding Bell Mountain Lease

158

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-10 3-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist Project/Activity: Install a test cover at Grand Junction, CO, Disposal Site . A. Brief Project/Activity Description The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management eLM) proposes to install a 70 foot (ft) x 140 ft test cover that duplicates the top 42 inches of the existing cover at the Grand Junction, CO, Disposal Site. The purpose of the test cover is to evaluate methods for renovating low-permeability disposal cell covers and to measure the effects of renovation on soil hydraulic properties and seedbed ecology. The test cover would be constructed on the surface of an existing stockpile of clay soil and would be located approximately 100 ft from an existing access

159

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Install demonstration wind turbine at Weldon Spring, MO, Site A. Brief Project/Activity Description The U.S. Depatiment of Energy Office of Legacy Management proposes to install a small (6 to 9 feet [ft] diameter) wind turbine near the Interpretive Center on the Weldon Spring Site. The wind turbine would be pole-mounted with a final height of20 to 30 ft above the ground surface. The turbine would be considered a small demonstration project to show the public practical home use of wind energy, and it would also correlate with a larger permanent renewable energy display within the Interpretivc Center. The wind turbine is expected to produce enough energy to run the

160

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ll-10 ll-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist Project/Activity: Maintenance actions at the Monument Valley, AZ, Site A. Brief Project/Activity Description The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legaey Management needs to remove windblown sand that has built up along the Monument Valley, AZ, Site north fence line, repair eroded areas below the fence, and raise the height of the site perimeter fence to prevent domestic animal intrusion into the site area. The windblown sand has formed a small dune along the nOlth perimeter fence line of the site. The affected fence is 3 feet high and consists of three strands of barbed wire. Windblown weeds accumulate along the fence and trap sand, which over time buries the fence and enables free-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

D. # LM-lS-lO D. # LM-lS-lO U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Install geotechnical holes at the Lakeview, OR, Disposal Site A. Brief Project/Activity Description The U.S. DepaJiment of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) proposes to advance six direct-push geotechnical holes into the top of the Lakeview Disposal Cell and two geotechnical holes into the side slopes of the Lakeview Disposal Cell to determine moisture conditions within the cell. The holes would be hydraulically pushed 10 to 55 feet (ft) into the cell using a geoprobe rig. To ensure protection of the 2-ft-thick compacted clay barrier beneath the tailings, hole locations and depths would be limited so as to not extend within 10 ft of the base of the tailings. A plan that

162

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28-10 28-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checldist Project/Activity: New Verde Mine Investigations, Lease Tract C-G-26, Uranium Leasing Program A. Brief Project/Activity Description Energy Fuels Resources Corporation (EFRC), lessee to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, proposes to evaluate former mine workings associated with the New Verde Mine on Lease Tract C-G-26 in preparation for potential future mine development. This lease tract is on Calamity Mesa, along the southern flank of the Uncompahgre Plateau in southwestern Mesa County. The mine site would be accessed by workers on a former mine access road and on public roads. A bulkhead, approximately 6 feet (ft) high and 9 ft wide, was constructed of concrete blocks in 1996 to seal the

163

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 2011 20, 2011 CX-006817: Categorical Exclusion Determination McNary-Ross No. 1 Upgrade Project, Surface Impairment Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Klickitat and Clark Counties, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 19, 2011 CX-006840: Categorical Exclusion Determination Security Barrier Relocation at the 618-11 Burial Grounds CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office September 19, 2011 CX-006839: Categorical Exclusion Determination Training Exercises and Simulations on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 16, 2011

164

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

165

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-002030: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Array and Charging Stations - Administration Building/Cathcart CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-002029: Categorical Exclusion Determination Engine Generator for Enumclaw Dairy Manure Digester CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-001830: Categorical Exclusion Determination YWCA Family Village at Issaquah CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King county, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

166

Assessing the Thermal Environmental Impacts of an Groundwater Heat Pump in Southeastern Washington State  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A thermal analysis of a large-scale (e.g., 1900 gpm), open-loop ground source heat pump (GSHP) installed on the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) campus in southeastern Washington State has been performed using a numerical modeling approach. Water temperature increases at the upgradient extraction wells in the system and at the downgradient Columbia River are potential concerns, especially since heat rejection to the subsurface will occur year-round. Hence, thermal impacts of the open-loop GSHP were investigated to identify operational scenarios that minimized downgradient environmental impacts at the river, and upgradient temperature drift at the production wells. Simulations examined the sensitivity of the system to variations in pumping rates and injected water temperatures, as well as to hydraulic conductivity estimates of the aquifer. Results demonstrated that both downgradient and upgradient thermal impacts were more sensitive to injection flow rates than estimates of hydraulic conductivity. Higher injection rates at lower temperatures resulted in higher temperature increases at the extraction wells but lower increases at the river. Conversely, lower pumping rates and higher injected water temperatures resulted in a smaller temperature increase at the extraction wells, but higher increases at the river. The scenario with lower pumping rates is operationally more efficient, but does increase the likelihood of a thermal plume discharging into the Columbia River. However, this impact would be mitigated by mixing within the hyporheic zone and the Columbia River. The impact under current operational conditions is negligible, but future increases in heat rejection could require a compromise between maximizing operational efficiency and minimizing temperature increases at the shoreline.

Freedman, Vicky L.; Waichler, Scott R.; Mackley, Rob D.; Horner, Jacob A.

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Books, co-authored 3 Ernst, J., M. C. Monroe, and B. Simmons. 2009. Evaluating your environmental education program. Washington DC: NAAEE.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Environmental Problem Solving: Theory, Practice and Possibilities in Environmental Education. Troy OH: NAAEE Best Practices in Boating, Fishing, and Stewardship Education. Washington DC: Recreational BoatingBooks, co-authored 3 Ernst, J., M. C. Monroe, and B. Simmons. 2009. Evaluating your environmental

Hill, Jeffrey E.

168

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 17, 2010 December 17, 2010 CX-004835: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electric Vehicle Charging Stations City of Mill Creek CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/17/2010 Location(s): Mill Creek, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 16, 2010 CX-004691: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Kirkland, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 16, 2010 CX-004836: Categorical Exclusion Determination Marine and Hydrokinetic Technology Readiness Advancement Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Lynnwood, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

169

United States Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Environmental Compliance Handbook. Third edition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Environment, Safety & Health Division (ESHD) of the Nevada Operations Office has prepared this Environmental Compliance Handbook for all users of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and other US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) facilities. The Handbook gives an overview of the important environmental laws and regulations that apply to the activities conducted by the Nevada Operations Office and other users of DOE/NV facilities in Nevada.

NONE

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26, 2010 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 23, 2010 EIS-0119: Amended Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Fiber Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/21/2010 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington

171

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington, D.C. 20585 Washington, D.C. 20585 April 25, 2013 2 Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board - April 25, 2013 Meeting Minutes LIST OF ACRONYMS AB - Advisory Board ANL - Argonne National Laboratory ARP - Accelerator Retrieval Project BNL - Brookhaven National Laboratory BRC - Blue Ribbon Commission CAB - Citizens Advisory Board D&D - Decontamination & Decommissioning DDFO - Deputy Designated Federal Officer DOE - Department of Energy DUF6 - Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride DWPF - Defense Waste Processing Facility EIS - Environmental Impact Statement EM - DOE Office of Environmental Management EM SSAB - DOE Office of Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FY - Fiscal Year

172

Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

BER Home BER Home Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » BER Accomplishments BSSD / CESD Timeline Take an interactive look at a century of scientific accomplishments in BER's Climate and Environmental Sciences / Biological Systems Science DivisionsRead More BER Interactive Accomplishments Timeline Understanding Complex Biological and Environmental Systems

173

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 25, 1994 February 25, 1994 EA-0915: Final Environmental Assessment Waste Tank Safety Program Hanford Site, Richland, Washington January 1, 1994 EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tenaska Washington II Generation Project, Washington September 16, 1993 EIS-0119: Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington December 1, 1992 EIS-0119: Final Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1, 1992 EA-0429: Final Environmental Assessment Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 10, 1992 EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact Tank 241-c-103 Organic Vapor and Liquid Characterization and Supporting

174

PRESENTATION: OVERVIEW OF DOE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (EM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A briefing to the SEAB Task Force on Technology Development for Environmental Management on the DOE Ofiice of Environmental Management. 

175

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25, 2010 25, 2010 CX-003611: Categorical Exclusion Determination Schultz - Raver Number 3 and 4 500-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Lines Spacer Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination

176

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 3, 2010 May 3, 2010 CX-002190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation Energy Efficiency Retrofits of Tribal Center CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Nisqually Reservation, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy May 3, 2010 CX-002438: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rocky Reach-Maple Valley Number-1 Transmission Line Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 30, 2010 CX-002137: Categorical Exclusion Determination Farm Power Lynden CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/30/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

177

Environmental consequences of postulated plutonium releases from Exxon Nuclear MOFP, Richland, Washington, as a result of severe natural phenomena  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Potential environmental consequences in terms of radiation dose to people are presented for postulated plutonium releases caused by severe natural phenomena at the Exxon Nuclear Company Mixed Oxide Fabrication Plant (MOFP), Richland, Washington. The severe natural phenomena considered are earthquakes, tornadoes, high straight-line winds, and floods. Maximum plutonium deposition values are given for significant locations around the site. All important potential exposure pathways are examined. The most likely 50-year committed dose equivalents are given for the maximum-exposed individual and the population within a 50-mile radius of the plant. The maximum plutonium deposition values most likely to occur offsite are also given.

Jamison, J.D.; Watson, E.C.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 9, 1995 November 9, 1995 EA-1123: Final Environmental Assessment Transfer of Normal and Low-Enriched Uranium Billets to the United Kingdom, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0212: Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0173: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Puget Power Northwest Washington Transmission Project October 1, 1995 EIS-0245: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Finding of No Significant Impact Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Final Environmental Assessment Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington

179

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

15, 2010 15, 2010 CX-001639: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transportation Demand Management on 164th S/128th SW/20th SE CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 15, 2010 CX-001821: Categorical Exclusion Determination SGL Automotive Carbon Limited Liability Company (LLC) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Moses Lake, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 31, 2010 CX-001386: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dragoon Creek Access to Bonneville Power Administration's Bell-Boundary #3 Transmission Line to Replace Existing Bridge CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B1.3 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Spokane County, Washington

180

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 15, 2011 February 15, 2011 CX-005262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Woodland and 148th Clearwire Wireless Communication Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 02/15/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration February 11, 2011 CX-005224: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/11/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 10, 2011 CX-005218: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/10/2011 Location(s): Renton, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010 CX-003023: Categorical Exclusion Determination Output Power Purchase Agreement with Northwest Energy Supply Cooperative - Barr-Tech, LLC Resource CX(s) Applied: B4.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Fishtrap, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2010 CX-002874: Categorical Exclusion Determination Game Farm Park Energy Efficient Replacement Lighting Project CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 30, 2010 CX-002873: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green House Gas Inventory CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 24, 2010 CX-002876: Categorical Exclusion Determination

182

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13, 2010 13, 2010 CX-003035: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B4.4, B5.1 Date: 07/13/2010 Location(s): Fox Island, Washington Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 12, 2010 CX-003628: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kittitas County Conservation Easement Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003447: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bridge and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003240: Categorical Exclusion Determination

183

DOE/EIS-0333; Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration, Benton County, Washington (03/2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1520 Kelly Place 1520 Kelly Place Walla Walla, Washington 99362 March 26, 2002 In reply refer to: PTS/Walla Walla To: People Interested in the Maiden Wind Farm We would like to hear from you about Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Benton County's Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Maiden Wind Farm. If you requested a copy of the Draft EIS or Summary, it is enclosed for your review. Comments will be accepted until May 15, 2002. The Draft EIS describes the proposed project, tells why it may be needed, discusses the environmental and social impacts the project could create, and lists the mitigation measures that would lessen or eliminate those impacts. We greatly appreciate your time in reviewing the document and giving us

184

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management P.O  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

O . Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Mr. David Hemelright, Chair Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Post Office Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Dear Mr. Hemelright:...

185

Potential social, institutional, and environmental impacts of selected energy-conservation measures in two Washington communities. [Seattle and Yakima  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The likely environmental, social, and institutional impacts of selected energy-conservation measures in two communities in Washington state are reported. The five conservation measures investigated in this study were: (1) retrofitting existing buildings; (2) district heating and Integrated Community Energy Systems (ICES); (3) small automobiles and vehicle redesign; (4) land-use and housing modifications; and (5) electric-utility rate reform. Twenty potential impact areas were selected for analysis. These areas were divided into five categories of environmental impacts, economic impacts, community impacts, personal impacts, and overall quality of life in the community. The research was conducted in Seattle and Yakima, Washington. In each location, about two dozen public officials and business, labor, and community leaders were interviewed. Their diverse views are summarized. The Seattle respondents saw energy conservation as a highly desirable policy with a number of temporary, transitional problems arising as energy-conservation measures were implemented. Yakima respondents, in contrast, did not expect to encounter many serious energy problems in the foreseeable future and consequently viewed energy conservation as a relatively minor community concern. Moreover, they anticipated that many conservation measures, if implemented by the government, would encounter either apathy or resistance in their community. Two broad generalizations can bedrawn from these interviews: (1) energy conservation will basically be beneficial for the natural environment and our society; and (2) if energy conservation does become a dominant thrust in our society, it could stimulate and reinforce a much broader process of fundamental social change. (LCL)

Edelson, E.; Olsen, M.

1980-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Departmen to Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters, November 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment of Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters May 2011 November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2

187

Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Departmen to Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters, November 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Assessment of Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters May 2011 November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2

188

HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Safety Regulations and Policies for Offices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Safety Regulations and Policies for Offices #12;University of Saskatchewan HSEMS Safety Regulations and Policies for Offices Version 1 ­ February 1, 2011 1 Table of Contents University of Saskatchewan Policies Relating to Health, Safety and Environment

Saskatchewan, University of

189

EERE: Golden Field Office Public Reading Room - FINAL Environmental  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sk Sk Skip to main content Menu Energy.gov Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Search Search form Search Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Services Services Home Energy Basics States and Local Communities Technical Assistance Energy Analysis Jobs, Education, and Training Publications Funding Efficiency Efficiency Home Buildings Homes Advanced Manufacturing Government Energy Management Renewables Renewables Home Solar Geothermal Wind Water Transportation Transportation Home Vehicles Bioenergy Hydrogen & Fuel Cells About Us About Us Home News & Blog News & Blog Home Bioenergy Buildings Geothermal Government Energy Management Homes Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Advanced Manufacturing Solar Vehicles Water Wind

190

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington, D.C. | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington, D.C. Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington, D.C. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD June 11, 2013 CX-010460: Categorical Exclusion Determination Novel Low Cost Environmentally Friendly Synthetic Approaches toward Core-Shell Structured Micro CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/11/2013 Location(s): District of Columbia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory March 28, 2013 CX-010567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - Rapid Automated Modeling and Simulation of Existing Buildings for Energy Efficiency CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): California, District of Columbia Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

191

ROBERT H. SOCOLOW Office Address: Princeton Environmental Institute  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences; Acting Director, Center for Environmental Studies, Princeton University 1977-78: Professor, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences; Associate Director, Center Sciences; Member, Center for Environmental Studies, Princeton University 1971: Summer: Research Associate

192

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2010 September 30, 2010 CX-004092: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004074: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cascade Community Wind Mid Scale Wind Turbines CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 29, 2010 CX-004145: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Low Energy Enzyme Catalyzed Solvent for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/29/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington

193

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 7, 2011 October 7, 2011 CX-006814: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia Rural Electric Association (Columbia REA) Dayton Substation Tap Line Project CX(s) Applied: B4.12 Date: 10/07/2011 Location(s): Dayton, Columbia County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 28, 2011 CX-006957: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - Seattle Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Sandia Site Office September 26, 2011 EIS-0421: Record of Decision Big Eddy-Knight Transmission Project Wasco County, Oregon and Klickitat County, Washington September 26, 2011 CX-006843: Categorical Exclusion Determination ER52 Fire Station Warning Signals

194

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 18, 2009 November 18, 2009 CX-000195: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington County Pierce CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/18/2009 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 12, 2009 CX-000376: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boise White Paper Mill Carbon Capture and Sequestration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 11/12/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 4, 2009 Hydropower Upgrades to Yield Added Generation at Average Costs Less Than 4 cents per kWh - Without New Dams $30.6 million Recovery Act investment by the Department of Energy highlights the additional potential of hydro power November 2, 2009

195

Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

operation, deactivation, decontamination, decommissioning and environmental restoration. Conduct assessments of changes to operations, safety basis and modifications. Conducts...

196

EA-1693: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington 3: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington EA-1693: Transmission Services Facility, Clark County, Washington Summary DOE will prepare an EA to evaluate the potential environmental impacts from the proposed three-to-five story office building that would be constructed to meet the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold standard in energy efficiency and sustainability, near Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) existing Dittmer Building. BPA website: http://efw.bpa.gov/environmental_services/Document_Library/TSF_Project/ For more information, contact: Stephanie Breeden Environmental Project Manager Bonneville Power Administration - KEC-4 P.O. Box 3621 Portland, Oregon, 97208-3621 Direct telephone number 503-230-5192 Toll-free telephone number 1-800-282-3713

197

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2012 14, 2012 CX-009693: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009692: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009673: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington

198

Transportation Faculty Position The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Washington continues  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transportation Faculty Position The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of this action, applications are being solicited for a full-time, tenure-track faculty position in transportation in traffic operations, freight transportation, transportation planning, transportation safety

199

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Environmental Management  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Fernald Environmental Management Fernald Environmental Management Project - 027 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fernald Environmental Management Project (027) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP), formerly known as the Feed Materials Production Center, is located about 18 miles northwest of Cincinnati, Ohio. The facility produced uranium metal products between 1953 and 1989 for use in production reactors to make plutonium and tritium at other Department of Energy (DOE) sites in support of United States defense programs. Uranium metal production ended in July 1989 and resources shifted

200

Environmental assessment for the resiting, construction, and operation of the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This environmental assessment (EA) presents estimated environmental impacts from the resiting, construction, and operation of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), which is proposed to be constructed and operated on land near the south boundary of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The EMSL, if constructed, would be a modern research facility in which experimental, theoretical, and computational techniques can be focused on environmental restoration problems, such as the chemical and transport behavior of complex mixtures of contaminants in the environment. The EMSL design includes approximately 18,500 square meters (200,000 square feet) of floor space on a 12-hectare (30-acre) site. The proposed new site is located within the city limits of Richland in north Richland, at the south end of DOE`s 300 Area, on land to be deeded to the US by the Battelle Memorial Institute. Approximately 200 persons are expected to be employed in the EMSL and approximately 60 visiting scientists may be working in the EMSL at any given time. State-of-the-art equipment is expected to be installed and used in the EMSL. Small amounts of hazardous substances (chemicals and radionuclides) are expected to be used in experimental work in the EMSL.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

EA-1488: Draft Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

728D 728D Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release; Further Disseminat ion Uillimited June 2011 DOE/EA-1728D June 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 This page intentionally left blank. 7 8 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728D Draft Environmental Assessment iii June 2011 CONTENTS 1 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 3

202

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 9, 2010 September 9, 2010 CX-003832: Categorical Exclusion Determination Issaquah Highlands Zero Energy Affordable Housing CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1, B6.3 Date: 09/09/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 8, 2010 CX-003908: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fiscal Year 2010 Columbia Basin Fish Accords with Colville Confederated Tribes CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 8, 2010 CX-003789: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grandview-Red Mountain Number 1 Proposed Transmission Line Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington

203

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States » Washington United States » Washington Washington December 24, 2013 The concrete "core" is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Office of River Protection's (ORP) mission continues: to retrieve, treat and dispose of the 56 million gallons of radioactive and chemical waste stored in large, underground tanks. In 2013, ORP maintained steady progress toward the successful completion of its mission. December 24, 2013 Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record

204

Carlsbad Field Office Recognized by New Mexico and DOE for Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Recognized by New Mexico and DOE for Recognized by New Mexico and DOE for Environmental Excellence at WIPP Carlsbad Field Office Recognized by New Mexico and DOE for Environmental Excellence at WIPP December 13, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Deb Gill www.wipp.energy.gov 575-234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) was selected for top recognition for environmental stewardship and for reducing energy, water and paper usage at the DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) recently selected CBFO for a Bronze Award under their Green Zia Environmental Leadership Program, which recognized New Mexico businesses or organizations for their commitment towards environmental stewardship by implementing pollution prevention

205

Environmental Assessment for the Transfer of 1100 AREA, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the U.S. Department of Energy's proposed action: the transfer of the 1100 Area, southern rail connection and rolling stock to a non-federal entity. Impact information contained herein will be used by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office Manager, to determine if the proposed action is a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If the proposed action is determined to be major and significant, an environmental impact statement will be prepared. If the proposed action is determined not to be major and significant, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be issued and the action can proceed. Criteria used to evaluate significance can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1508.27. This EA was prepared in compliance with the ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508), and the U.S. Department of Energy Implementing Procedures for NEPA (10 CFR 1021). The following is a description of each section of the EA. (1) Purpose and Need for Action. This provides a brief statement concerning the problem or opportunity the U.S. Department of Energy is addressing with the proposed action. As necessary, background information is provided. (2) Description of the Proposed Action. A description with sufficient detail to identify potential environmental impacts is provided. (3) Alternatives to the Proposed Action. Reasonable alternative actions, which would address the Purpose and Need, are described. A no action alternative, as required by 10 CFR 1021, also is described. (4) Affected Environment. This provides a brief description of the locale in which the proposed action takes place, and which may be environmentally impacted. (5) Environmental Impacts. The range of environmental impacts, beneficial and adverse, are described for the proposed action. Impacts of alternatives briefly are discussed. (6) Permits and Regulatory Requirements. A brief description of permits and regulatory requirements for the proposed action is provided. (7) Organizations Consulted. Any outside agencies, groups, or individuals contacted as part of environmental assessment documentation preparation are listed. (8) References. Documents used to provide information or data are listed. The appendices contain additional information necessary to support an understanding of the proposed action, alternatives, and potential impacts is provided. Comments resulting from review of the environmental assessment by states and tribes or other stakeholders and the response to those comments will be included in the appendices.

N /A

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Environmental assessment for the relocation and storage of isotopic heat sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of a bilateral agreement between the Federal Minister for Research and Technology of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and the DOE, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) developed processes for the treatment and immobilization of high-level radioactive waste. One element of this bilateral agreement was the production of sealed isotopic heat sources. During the mid-1980s, 30 sealed isotopic heat sources were manufactured. The sources contain a total of approximately 8.3 million curies consisting predominantly of cesium-137 and strontium-90 with trace amounts of transuranic contamination. Currently, the sources are stored in A-Cell of the 324 Building. Intense radiation fields from the sources are causing the cell windows and equipment to deteriorate. Originally, it was not intended to store the isotopic heat sources for this length of time in A-cell. The 34 isotopic heat sources are classified as remote handled transuranic wastes. Thirty-one of the isotopic heat sources are sealed, and seals on the three remaining isotopic heat sources have not been verified. However, a decision has been made to place the remaining three isotopic heat sources in the CASTOR cask(s). The Washington State Department of Health (WDOH) has concurred that isotopic heat sources with verified seals or those placed into CASTOR cask(s) can be considered sealed (no potential to emit radioactive air emissions) and are exempt from WAC Chapter 246-247, Radiation Protection-Air Emissions.

NONE

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Pursues Vision of Future While  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Environmental Management Pursues Vision of Office of Environmental Management Pursues Vision of Future While Remembering Past Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Pursues Vision of Future While Remembering Past December 27, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Demolition of K-25, DOE’s largest-ever demolition project, is ongoing. Demolition of K-25, DOE's largest-ever demolition project, is ongoing. This graphic shows the status of activities at the East Tennessee Technology Park as of this month. Various colors note sites where facilities have been demolished, demolition is under way, or structures are ready or being prepared for demolition. It also identifies buildings that will remain there. This graphic shows the status of activities at the East Tennessee Technology Park as of this month. Various colors note sites where

208

Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Oak Ridge Environmental Management Program Moving to the Future by Cleaning up the Past Sue Cange Acting Manager May 16, 2012 Oak Ridge Cleanup Work is Urgent and Essential * Our...

209

Offices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Offices Offices Offices All Offices Program Offices Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy Loan Programs Office Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Office of Environmental Management Office of Fossil Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs Office of Legacy Management Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Science Staff Offices Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs Office of Economic Impact and Diversity Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Inspector General Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Office of Management Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of Policy and International Affairs

210

Remedial actions at the former Vitro Rare Metals plant site, Canonsburg, Washington County, Pennsylvania. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume I  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The environmental impacts associated with remedial actions in connection with residual radioactive materials remaining at the inactive uranium processing site located in Canonsburg, Washington County, Pennsylvania are evaluated. The Canonsburg site is an 18.5-acre property that was formerly owned by the Vitro Rare Metals Company. The expanded Canonsburg site would be 30-acre property that would include the Canonsburg site (the former Vitro Rare Metals plant), seven adjacent private houses, and the former Georges Pottery property. During the period 1942 through 1957 the Vitro Manufacturing Company and its successor, the Vitro Corporation of America, processed onsite residues and ores, and government-owned ores, concentrates, and scraps to extract uranium and other rare metals. The Canonsburg site is now the Canon Industrial Park. In addition to storing the residual radioactive materials of this process at the Canonsburg site, about 12,000 tons of radioactively contaminated materials were transferred to a railroad landfill in Burrell Township, Indiana County, Pennsylvania. This Canonsburg FEIS evaluates five alternatives for removing the potential public health hazard associated with the radioactively contaminated materials. In addition to no action, these alternatives involve various combinations of stabilization of the radioactively contaminated materials in place or decontamination of the Canonsburg and Burrell sites by removing the radioactively contaminated materials to another location. In addition to the two sites mentioned, a third site located in Hanover Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania has been considered as a disposal site to which the radioactively contaminated materials presently located at either of the other two sites might be moved.

Not Available

1983-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2011 9, 2011 Department of Energy Announces $39 Million to Strengthen University-Led Nuclear Energy Research and Development 51 Projects Aim to Cut Carbon Pollution, Create Clean Energy Jobs and Strengthen America's Nuclear Energy Industry August 9, 2011 CX-006474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Biodiesel Crusher and Dryer Facility Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/09/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 8, 2011 CX-006463: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/08/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 8, 2011

212

PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL October 30, 2013 Julie A. Smith and Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 VIA electronic mail: juliea.smith@hq.doe.gov christopher.lawrence@hq.doe.gov Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Lawrence: The Piedmont Environmental Council (PEC) was founded in 1972 to promote and protect the Virginia

213

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HSW HSW EIS January 2004 1.6 Figure 1.2. States with Radioactive Waste Disposal Activities Final HSW EIS January 2004 1.12 Figure 1.3. Relationship of the HSW EIS to Other Hanford Cleanup Operations, Material Management Activities, and Key Environmental Reviews 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.34 Figure 2.18. Typical Liner System Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.36

214

300 Area steam plant replacement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington: Environmental assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Steam to support process operations and facility heating is currently produced by a centralized oil-fired plant located in the 300 Area and piped to approximately 26 facilities in the 300 Area. This plant was constructed during the 1940s and, because of tis age, is not efficient, requires a relatively large operating and maintenance staff, and is not reliable. The US Department of Energy is proposing an energy conservation measure for a number of buildings in the 300 Area of the Hanford Site. This action includes replacing the centralized heating system with heating units for individual buildings or groups of buildings, constructing new natural gas pipelines to provide a fuel source for many of these units and constructing a central control building to operate and maintain the system. A new steel-sided building would be constructed in the 300 Area in a previously disturbed area at least 400 m (one-quarter mile) from the Columbia River, or an existing 300 Area building would be modified and used. This Environmental Assessment evaluates alternatives to the proposed actions. Alternatives considered are: (1) the no action alternative; (2) use of alternative fuels, such as low-sulfur diesel oil; (3) construction of a new central steam plant, piping and ancillary systems; (4) upgrade of the existing central steam plant and ancillary systems; and (5) alternative routing of the gas distribution pipeline that is a part of the proposed action. A biological survey and culture resource review and survey were also conducted.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 14, 2012 December 14, 2012 CX-009689: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009672: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Relocation of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009671: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Demolition and Disposal of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012

216

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 17, 2009 July 17, 2009 EIS-0424: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Klickitat Hatchery Program, Klickitat and Yakima Counties, WA July 1, 2009 EA-1660: Final Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington April 21, 2009 EIS-0419: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Whistling Ridge Energy Project in Skamania County, Washington. March 12, 2009 State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire Letter from Washington Governor Gregoire providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so that Recovery Act funds can be made available. These assurances are required by Section 410 of the American Recovery and

217

BPA/Puget Power Northwest Washington Transmission Project Final Environmental Impact Statement.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Puget Sound Power & Light Company (Puget Power) propose to upgrade the existing high-voltage transmission system in the Whatcom and Skagit counties area between the towns of Custer and Sedro Woolley, including some areas within the City of Bellingham, starting in 1995. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the project was issued in November 1993, followed by a 45-day public comment period. Public response to the DEIS included the identification of several new transmission route alternatives in the Lake Whatcom area. BPA issued a Supplemental DEIS in April 1995 to provide a second public review-and-comment period. Rebuilding an existing 230-kV line to a double-circuit 230-kV transmission line was identified in the Supplemental DEIS as the Proposed Action. The Supplemental DEIS also examined in detail a North Shore Road alternative which was proposed by some members of the public. Public comments on the EIS were listed and responded to in the Supplemental DEIS. In May 1995, a second set of open houses and public meetings was held to review the Supplemental DEIS. Electromagnetic field (EMF) effects raised as an issue in the DEIS continued to be an issue of public concern in the meetings. The EIS has identified impacts that would generally be classified as low to moderate and localized. Effects on soils and water resources in sensitive areas (e.g., near Lake Whatcom) would be low to moderate; there would be little change in magnetic fields; noise levels would remain at existing levels; and land use and property value impacts would be minimal. Threatened and endangered species would not be adversely affected, and all proposed actions in wetlands would be covered by a Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit. Visual and socioeconomic would be low to moderate. There would be no effect on cultural resources.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

Environmental Monitoring Plan United States Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Monitoring Plan was prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Richland Operations Office (RL) to implement the requirements of DOE Order 5400.1. According to the Order, each DOE site, facility, or activity that uses, generates, releases, or manages significant pollutants or hazardous materials shall prepare a written environmental monitoring plan covering two major activities: (1) effluent monitoring and (2) environmental surveillance. The plan is to contain information discussing the rationale and design criteria for the monitoring programs, sampling locations and schedules, quality assurance requirements, program implementation procedures, analytical procedures, and reporting requirements. The plan`s purpose is to assist DOE in the management of environmental activities at the Hanford Site and to help ensure that operations on the site are conducted in an environmentally safe and sound manner.

NONE

1997-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

219

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington, D.C., Roundtable Summary Washington, D.C., Roundtable Summary March 30, 2011 Prepared by: The Udall Foundation's U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution DOE Tribal Roundtable on Tribal Energy Washington, DC Mach 30, 2011 WASHINGTON, D.C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Washington, D.C. Roundtable on Tribal Energy Policy and Priorities convened at 1:30 PM on March 30, 2011 at the Dirksen Senate Building. The meeting was hosted by the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs (Office of Indian Energy). Tracey LeBeau, Director of the Office of Indian Energy, and Pilar Thomas, Deputy Director-Policy, Office of Indian Energy, represented DOE. Twenty-six participants from six different tribes, various

220

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000346: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2009 CX-000457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Focused Site Characterization for Carbon Dioxide Storage Along a Mount Simon Sandstone Fairway in the Michigan Basin CX(s) Applied: A1, A9

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11, 2011 11, 2011 EIS-0422: Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration's Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project March 11, 2011 CX-005421: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohop Underbuild Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6, B4.12 Date: 03/11/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 7, 2011 CX-005417: Categorical Exclusion Determination Beaver Creek Property CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 03/07/2011 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 4, 2011 Latest 200 Area Demolition Offers Snapshot of Hanford Cleanup Progress: Recovery Act Funding Allows Demolition of Power Houses Ahead of Schedule RICHLAND, WASH. - Today's safe and successful explosive demolition at

222

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 15, 2010 June 15, 2010 CX-003090: Categorical Exclusion Determination Perform Routine Access Road Maintenance within the McNary-Ross Number 1 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/15/2010 Location(s): Klickitat County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 11, 2010 More than $60 Million in Recovery Act Funding to Expand Local Energy Efficiency Efforts in 20 Communities Competitive block grants to support jobs, save money and increase energy independence June 10, 2010 CX-002767: Categorical Exclusion Determination Granite Mountain 3G Radio Station Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/10/2010 Location(s): Stevens County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2010 Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program

223

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 4, 2011 May 4, 2011 CX-005761: Categorical Exclusion Determination 707-C Storm Drain Repairs CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/04/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 28, 2011 CX-005765: Categorical Exclusion Determination Feed Pump Flush Water Connection/Lifting Bail Interference (General - F/H Tank Farms) CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 28, 2011 CX-005892: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia River Inter-Tidal Fish Commission Use of White Bluffs Boat Launch and Hanford Town Boat Ramp for Salmon Tagging CX(s) Applied: B3.8 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

224

National Academy of Sciences Executive Office  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, and the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, the National Research Council's Board on Environmental Studies Board (ISAB) and Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP). Dr. David Policansky of the NRC's Board1 National Academy of Sciences Executive Office 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418

225

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18, 2013 18, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDM AN CHAIRP ERSON rROM: SU BJ ECT: REFERENCE: FEDE RAL TECHN ICA L CAPABILITIES PANEL MARK WI IITNEY It J I MAN AG ER VV"-c.--'\<.- OAK RIDGE OFFICE or ENV IRONMENT/\L M~ OAK RIDG E OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT/\ L M/\NAGEMENT ANNUAL WORKFORCE ANAL YSJS AND STAFFING REPORT Memorandum from Karen L. Boardman to Distribution, Annual Workfhrce Analysis and Stqfftng Plan Report f(Jr Calendar Year 20 12, dated October 24, 20 12 As requested, attached is the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Manage ment (OREM) Calendar Year 2012 annual workforce anal ys is and staffing plan th at identifi es the technica l capabil iti es and pos itions ORe:M needs to ensure safe operations of OREM assigned nuc lear faci liti es. This report is submitted for incorporation into the Federa

226

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Environmental for the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1 . 0 Summary . . 2.0 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . 3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Proposed Action 3.2 Onsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Offsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . 3.4 No Action Alternative ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Atmospheric Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Terrestrial Impacts . 5.1.3 Impacts on CERCLA Remedial Actions . 5.1.4 Construction Accidents .

227

The Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management: Project performance study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) of the US Department of Energy commissioned Independent Project Analysis, Inc. (IPA) to perform this Project Performance Study to provide a quantitative analysis determining how well EM develops and executes environmental remediation and waste management projects. The approach consisted of collecting detailed data on a sample of 65 completed and ongoing EM projects conducted since 1984. These data were then compared with key project characteristics and outcomes from 233 environmental remediation projects (excluding EM) in IPA`s Environmental Remediation Database and 951 projects In IPA`s Capital Projects Database. The study establishes the standing of the EM system relative to other organizations, and suggests areas and opportunities for improvement.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 19,2010 August 19,2010 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Neil Brosee President Washington Closure Hanford, LLC 2620 Fermi Avenue Richland, Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the employee fall that occurred at the Hanford High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) on July 1, 2009. The worker sustained serious injury to his back and broke bones in both legs. Based on an evaluation of the evidence in this matter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program, by Washington Closure Hanford, LLC (WCH) occurred. Accordingly, DOE is issuing the enclosed Preliminary Notice of

229

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 26, 2011 July 26, 2011 Hanford Reaches Recovery Act Goal for Waste Cleanup Ahead of Schedule - Workers Shipped 1,800 Cubic Meters for Treatment and Disposal RICHLAND, Wash. - Today, the Department of Energy Hanford Site announced it reached a cleanup goal more than two months ahead of schedule at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. July 25, 2011 CX-006290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cardwell-Cowlitz 2011 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/25/2011 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2011 CX-006304: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell #3/Grand Coulee-Westside #1 Insulator Replacement and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/21/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington

230

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 8, 2000 March 8, 2000 EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington September 15, 1999 EIS-0310: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Accomplishing Expanded Civilian Nuclear Energy Research and Development and Isotope Production Missions in the United States, Including the Role of the Fast Flux Test Facility September 1, 1999 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 16, 1999 EIS-0169-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site

231

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21, 2011 21, 2011 CX-007750: Categorical Exclusion Determination Highlands Trail in the Longview-Cowlitz Number 1 Transmission Line Right-of-Way CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration December 16, 2011 Cows like these in Skagit County, Washington, supply the biodigester developed by Kevin Maas of Farm Power up to 70,000 gallons of manure per day. The newest Farm Power facility in Washington generates enough electricity to power 500 homes. Photo courtesy of sea_turtle. Farming Out Heat and Electricity through Biopower The newest biodigester at the Farm Power facility in Washington generates electricity from biogas created from bacteria's anaerobic digestion of cow

232

News From the D.C. Office: E x p a n s i o n  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. 3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. News From the D.C. Office E x p a n s i o n With a growing amount of project support work and increasing contacts with our Washington-based clients, the Environmental Energy Technologies Division (EETD) Washington Project Office is preparing for an expansion this spring. Two years after the office opened, we are making plans to more than double our present space and add a second meeting room, as well as additional demonstrations of efficient lighting, daylighting, and office technologies. The expanded space will be located either on a different floor of our current building at 1250 Maryland Ave. SW or in another building equally close to DOE headquarters. The Project office was established in Spring 1993 to enhance the Division's

233

Department of Energy EPA\\OAR\\Office of Radiation and Indoor Air U. S. Environmental Protection Agency  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Agency Ariel Rios Building, 6601 J 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20460 Subject: Hanford Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) staff asked some additional questions concerning the Hanford Tank and K (DOE) staff, EPA staff and Hanford site personnel on April 13, 2005. Three questions remain

234

Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington River Protection Solutions OAS-M-15-01 January 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of...

235

CEQ Environmental Justice Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JUSTICE JUSTICE Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President Old Executive Office Building, Room 360 Washington, D.C. 20502 (202)395-5750 http://www.whitehouse.gov/CEQ/ December 10, 1997 ii Table of Contents I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Executive Order 12898 and the Presidential Memorandum . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 III. Executive Order 12898 and NEPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 A. NEPA Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 B. Principles for Considering Environmental Justice under NEPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1. General Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2. Additional Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

236

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 26, 1997 February 26, 1997 EIS-0189: Record of Decision Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, WA December 1, 1996 EA-1111: Final Environmental Assessment K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 21, 1996 EA-1177: Final Environmental Assessment Salvage/Demolition of 200 West Area, 200 East Area, and 300 Area Steam Plants August 1, 1996 EIS-0189: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1996 EIS-0244: Final Environmental Impact Statement Plutonium Finishing Plant Stabilization April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement Disposal of Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser, Ohio Class, Los Angeles and Class Naval Reactor Plants April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement

237

EA-1055; Environmental Assessment and (FONSI) for The Proposed Center for Advanced Industrial Processes Washington State University College of Engineering and Architecture  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

55; Environmental Assessment and (FONSI) for The Proposed 55; Environmental Assessment and (FONSI) for The Proposed Center for Advanced Industrial Processes Washington State University College of Engineering and Architecture Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 1. DOCUMENT SUMMARY 2. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION 3. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION 3.1 Description of the Proposed Action 3.2 Project Description 3.2.1 Construction Activities 3.2.2 Operation Activities 3.3 No Action Alternative 4. THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 4.1 Site Description 4.2 Air Quality 4.3 Surface/Ground Water Quality 4.4 Soil 4.5 Sensitive Resources 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Sensitive Resources 5.1.2 Erosion/Run-Off 5.1.3 Demolition/Construction Waste Disposal 5.1.3.1 Conventional Wastes

238

Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL CLOTHES WASHERS December 2000 U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Office of Building Research and Standards Washington, DC 20585 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL CLOTHES WASHERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA-1 2. PURPOSE AND NEED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA-1 3. ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA-2 3.1 No Action Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA-2 3.2 Proposed Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA-2 3.3 Alternative Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA-3 3.4 Impacts of Proposed and Alternative Standards

239

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 26, 2010 July 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 26, 2010 CX-003170: Categorical Exclusion Determination Innovative Phase Change Thermal Energy Storage Solution for Baseload Power CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination

240

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Seattle, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Location: Seattle, WashingtonSeed Funding: $20 millionTarget Building Types: Residential, commercial, and institutionalWebsites: www.communitypowerworks.orgwww.seattle.gov/environment/CPWmain...

242

DOE Nevada Operations Office Environmental Protection Implementation Plan, November 9, 1993--November 9, 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE Order 5400.1, ``General Environmental Protection Program,`` established environmental protection program requirements, authorities, and responsibilities to assure that the Department of Energy (DOE) operations are in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal department policies. Chapter III of DOE Order 5400.1 required that each field organization prepare a plan for implementing the requirements of this order by no later than November 9, 1989, and update the plan annually. Therefore, the Department of Energy/Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) has prepared this fourth annual update of its Environmental Protection Implementation Plan (EPIP). The Order and corresponding guidances also require estimated budgetary resources necessary for implementation of the Order be identified in the Environmental Protection Implementation Plan. To satisfy this requirement, the estimated costs to effectuate necessary changes in existing programs or processes and to institute new programs or processes for compliance with the Order are provided in the following sections of this plan. The DOE/NV Assistant Manager for Environment, Safety, Security, & Health (AMESSH), in consultation with other organizations responsible for line management of plan implementation, is responsible for annual plan revisions.

Elle, D.R. [USDOE Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, NV (United States); Townsend, Y.E. [ed.; Latham, A.R.; Black, S.C. [Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Co., Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States)

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

Review of the Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Assessment of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Oversight of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Criticality Safety Program, May 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Assessment of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Oversight of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Criticality Safety Program May 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

244

SunShot Initiative: Visiting the SunShot Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Visiting the SunShot Office Visiting the SunShot Office Photo of the exterior front of 950 L'Enfant Plaza. The entryway is lined with a row of trees and lamp posts. In the foreground is an open space that is bricked and cemented. The DOE Solar Office is located at 950 L'Enfant Plaza in Washington, D.C. Located near the U.S. Department of Energy headquarters, the SunShot Initiative office is on the sixth floor of 950 L'Enfant Plaza, Washington, D.C. Map Washington, D.C. area map with the Solar Office pinpointed Washington D.C. Area Map Official Washington, D.C. Tourism Site - Virtual Tour of Washington, D.C. Metro Directions The Metro rail and bus system is the environmentally-friendly and economical way to get to L'Enfant Plaza. The L'Enfant Plaza station is conveniently located on the blue, orange, yellow, and green lines.

245

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 27, 1998 August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 13, 1998 EIS-0229: Notice of Availability of the Amended Record of Decision Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials August 1, 1998 EIS-0245-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1998 EIS-0189: Supplement Analysis Tank Waste Remediation System July 28, 1997 EA-1203: Final Environmental Assessment Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site,

246

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 4, 2011 April 4, 2011 CX-005572: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Washington-Tribe-Cowlitz Indian Tribe CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/04/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 30, 2011 CX-005577: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation for the Purchase of the Ninemile Creek Property Date: 03/30/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 27, 2011 CX-005474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Charging Stations - Willis D. Tucker Park CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/14/2011 Location(s): Snohomish, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

247

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 16, 2005 March 16, 2005 EIS-0312-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan December 23, 2004 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Hopkins Ridge Wind Interconnection Project September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project, Water Flow Restoration and Streambed Rehabilitation, Providing Passage for Summer Steelhead and Spring Chinook, Funding, Okanogan County, Washington September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project, Whatcom County, Washington

248

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 15, 2011 April 15, 2011 CX-005676: Categorical Exclusion Determination Murray-Custer #1 Transmission Line Wood Pole Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/15/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 13, 2011 Algae samples back at the NREL lab, ready to be analyzed and run through the Fluorescent-Activated Cell Sorter, or FACS, which separates the cells. | Credit: NREL Staff Photographer Dennis Schroeder. Study: Algae Could Replace 17% of U.S. Oil Imports A new study from Pacific Northwest National Lab concludes that 17% of U.S. oil imports for transportation could be replaced by domestically-produced algae biofuels. April 12, 2011 Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings King County uses $6.1 million to make investments that dramatically reduce

249

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24, 2011 24, 2011 Chemical engineer Alan Zacher 10 Questions for a Chemical Engineer: Alan Zacher Chemical engineer Alan Zacher took some time to share advice for students interested in science and engineering and give us the download on his work developing propylene glycol from renewable sources. March 24, 2011 CX-005523: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Bellevue CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/24/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 22, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Determination Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, WA March 22, 2011 EIS-0422: Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Central Ferry to Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project

250

Environmental Justice: Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

cover photograph of John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge at Tinicum cover photograph of John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge at Tinicum by John and Karen Hollingsworth Front cover photograph of school bus and children by Sam Kittner. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President Old Executive Office Building, Room 360 Washington, D.C. 20502 (202)395-5750 http://www.whitehouse.gov/CEQ/ December 10, 1997 Table of Contents I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Executive Order 12898 and the Presidential Memorandum . . . . . . . . . 3 III. Executive Order 12898 and NEPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 A. NEPA Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

251

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 22, 2013 CX-010734: Categorical Exclusion Determination Covington District Culvert Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2013 CX-010735: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell No.5 Dead End Insulator Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 24, 2013 CX-011171: Categorical Exclusion Determination Longview and Tillamook Substation Communication Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 09/24/2013

252

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, environmental data report for the Nevada Test Site -- 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5400.1, ``General Environmental Protection Program,`` establishes environmental protection program requirements, authorities, and responsibilities for DOE operations. These mandates require compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection regulations. During calendar year (CY) 1995 environmental protection and monitoring programs were conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and other DOE Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) managed sites in Nevada and across the United States. A detailed discussion of these environmental protection and monitoring programs, and summary data and assessments for environmental monitoring results at these sites in CY 1995 are provided in the DOE/NV, Annual Site Environmental Report--1995, (ASER) DOE/NV/11718-037. A brief description of the scope of this environmental monitoring is provided below, categorized by ``on-NTS`` and ``off-NTS`` monitoring.

Black, S.C.; Townsend, Y.E. [eds.; Kinnison, R.R.

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

GREEN AND BLUE SCHOOLS: THE USE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE RAINWATER DESIGN AT GEORGETOWN VISITATION PREPARATORY SCHOOL IN GEORGETOWN, WASHINGTON DC.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The artful management of stormwater has a capability to create educational arenas by combining environmentally sensitive rainwater design with education. School settings provide great opportunities… (more)

Jensen, Allison Palmer

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 25, 2010 August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Badger Canyon Substation Radio Communication Tower Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 24, 2010 CX-003613: Categorical Exclusion Determination

255

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 EIS-0333: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration, Benton County, Washington March 1, 2002 EA-1405: Final Environmental Assessment Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 27, 2002 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Mint Farm Generation Project February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-46: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-45: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 15, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-42: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 1, 2002 EIS-0332: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

256

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 7, 2011 July 7, 2011 CX-006111: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-Tribe-Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 7, 2011 CX-006262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Walla Walla County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2011 CX-008688: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of equipment at Wahkiakum Public Utility District's Cathlamet Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/02/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2011 CX-008011: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install EMSL Super-Computer Power Infrastructure

257

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 1, 2012 February 1, 2012 CX-007984: Categorical Exclusion Determination Explosives Research Capability Expansion, 300 Area, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 30, 2012 CX-007955: Categorical Exclusion Determination Exe-Guard (Formerly Whitelist) Antivirus Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.2, B1.7 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 27, 2012 CX-007880: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evergreen State Solar Partnership CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar

258

ISSUES REGARDING FEE STRUCTURE FOR THREE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS, CR-B-01-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CR-B-01-01 CR-B-01-01 AUDIT REPORT ISSUES REGARDING FEE STRUCTURE FOR THREE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS MAY 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, DC 20585 May 9, 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION FROM: Phillip L. Holbrook (Signed) Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Issues Regarding Fee Structure for

259

Humic and Fulvic Acids:? Isolation, Structure and Environmental Role Edited by Jeffrey S. Gaffney and Nancy A. Marley (Argonne National Laboratory) and Sue B. Clark (Washington State University). American Chemical Society:? Washington, DC. 1996. $109.95. xii + 338 pp. ISBN 0-8412-3468-X.  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Humic and Fulvic Acids:? Isolation, Structure and Environmental Role Edited by Jeffrey S. Gaffney and Nancy A. Marley (Argonne National Laboratory) and Sue B. Clark (Washington State University). ... Procedures described include nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), reflectance infrared spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, and liquid chromatography. ...

Michael M. Reddy

1998-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

260

DOE/EA-1728-F Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8-F 8-F Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1728-F 1 2 3 4 5 6 This page intentionally left blank. 7 8 U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment iii February 2012 CONTENTS 1 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 3 1.1 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION 4 RECOMMENDATION ...................................................................................................... 1 5 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ........................................................... 1 6

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Essays on Environmental and Resource Economics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

environmental offices, water, waste, environmental managementspaces, water treatment, environmental management, wastespaces, water treatment, environmental management, waste

Toledo, Chantal Nathalie

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Envkonmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- - 19-10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management National Envkonmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist Project/Activity: Drill one exploratory hole on L.T. c-WM-17 by Golden Eagle Uranium A. Brief Project! Activity Descl'iptioll Golden Eagle Uranium (LLC) proposes to drill one 5-inch-diameter exploratory borehole on U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) lease tract C-WM-17, located in western Montrose County, Colorado. The drilling would be completed by a truck-mounted rotary drill rig capable of boring to 1,000 feet (ft) below ground surface (bgs). The proposed location of the drill hole is in a previously disturbed area and is adjacent to a two-track dirt road. Access to the site would be on existing dirt roads. The drilling would be completed dry to an estimated depth of 550 ft bgs. Once data are collected, the hole

263

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 13, 2010 January 13, 2010 CX-000471: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Prescribed Burning on the Hanford Site During October, November, and December of 2010 to Maintain Critical Fire Breaks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 5, 2010 CX-000799: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sable Systems Oxzilla Oxygen Analyzer CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office January 5, 2010 CX-000800: Categorical Exclusion Determination Y593 Procure, Design and Install X-Ray Diffraction and X-Ray Fluorescence Instruments, 735-11A CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010

264

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 15, 2013 July 15, 2013 CX-010738: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2013 Spacer and Insulator Replacement Program; Third and Fourth Quarter Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/15/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2013 CX-010588: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chehalis Substation Tree Clearing CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 1, 2013 CX-010589: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nine Canyon Communication Tower Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 25, 2013 CX-010429: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harbour Pointe Small Generator Integration

265

In cooperation with Fort Peck Tribes Office of Environmental Protection Delineation of Brine Contamination in and near the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

;#12;Delineation of Brine Contamination in and near the East Poplar Oil Field, Fort Peck Indian Reservation citation: Thamke, J.N., and Smith, B.D., 2014, Delineation of brine contamination in and near the EastIn cooperation with Fort Peck Tribes Office of Environmental Protection Delineation of Brine

Torgersen, Christian

266

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 21, 2011 September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 20, 2011 CX-007036: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - North Service Center CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington

267

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 14, 2011 June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 06/14/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 10, 2011 CX-006198: Categorical Exclusion Determination South Tacoma - Frederickson Power Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 06/10/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2011 CX-006197: Categorical Exclusion Determination Omak Area 3G Radio Site Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2011 Location(s): Okanogan, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 8, 2011 CX-006049: Categorical Exclusion Determination

268

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 3, 2011 March 3, 2011 CX-005410: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Alcoa Number 1 and 2 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 3, 2011 CX-005409: Categorical Exclusion Determination Olympia-Grand Coulee Number 1 Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 2, 2011 CX-005379: Categorical Exclusion Determination Insulator Replacement in Agricultural Lands Along the Grand Coulee-Bell Number 3/Grand Coulee-Westside No. 1 Double Circuit 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/02/2011 Location(s): Lincoln County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

269

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 5, 2010 October 5, 2010 CX-004255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Spacer Dampers Along the Chief Joseph PH-Chief Joseph Number 6 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/05/2010 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 4, 2010 CX-004076: Categorical Exclusion Determination East Omak Substation Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 10/04/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 30, 2010 CX-004116: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

270

Carlsbad Field Office Receives New Mexico's Silver Award for  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Carlsbad Field Office Receives New Mexico's Silver Award for Carlsbad Field Office Receives New Mexico's Silver Award for Environmental Excellence Carlsbad Field Office Receives New Mexico's Silver Award for Environmental Excellence August 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis DOE Carlsbad Field Office Deputy Manager Ed Ziemianski presents a Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) team with the Green Zia Program Silver Level Leader award from the New Mexico Environment Department earlier this month in recognition of environmental initiatives. Shown right of Ziemianski is Farok Sharif, Washington TRU Solutions LLC, the WIPP management and operating contractor, President and General Manager. DOE Carlsbad Field Office Deputy Manager Ed Ziemianski presents a Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) team with the Green Zia Program Silver Level

271

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2010 1, 2010 CX-002359: Categorical Exclusion Determination Validation of Innovative Exploration Technologies at the Colado, Nevada, Geothermal Prospect CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9 Date: 05/11/2010 Location(s): Colado, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 10, 2010 CX-002368: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Tidal Energy Demonstration Project: Environmental and Permitting Activities CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.3, A9 Date: 05/10/2010 Location(s): Puget Sound, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 10, 2010 CX-002284: Categorical Exclusion Determination Environmental Effects of Sediment Transport Alteration and Impacts on Protected Species: Edgartown Tidal Energy Project

272

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Quartzsite Solar Energy Project and Proposed Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan Amendment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Quartzsite Solar Energy Project and Proposed Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan Amendment DOE/EIS - 0440 Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Yuma Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Garrison Yuma Proving Ground Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Game and Fish Department December 2012 COVER SHEET Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Garrison-Yuma Proving Ground Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

273

THE DOE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE PROGRAM: OVERVIEW OF TECHNICAL TASKS AND RESULTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Office of Engineering and Technology is responsible for implementing EM's International Cooperative Program. Over the past 15 years, collaborative work has been conducted through this program with researchers in Russia, Ukraine, France, United Kingdom and Republic of Korea. Currently, work is being conducted with researchers in Russia and Ukraine. Efforts aimed at evaluating and advancing technologies to support U.S. high-level waste (HLW) vitrification initiatives are being conducted in collaboration with Russian researchers. Work at Khlopin Radium Institute (KRI) is targeted at improving the throughput of current vitrification processes by increasing melting rate. These efforts are specifically targeted at challenging waste types identified at the Savannah River Site (SRS) and Hanford Site. The objectives of current efforts at SIA Radon are to gain insight into vitrification process limits for the cold crucible induction melter (CCIM) technology. Previous demonstration testing has shown that the CCIM offers the potential for dramatic increases in waste loading and waste throughput. However, little information is known regarding operational limits that could affect long-term, efficient CCIM operations. Collaborative work with the Russian Electrotechnical University (ETU) 'LETI' is aimed at advancing CCIM process monitoring, process control and design. The goal is to further mature the CCIM technology and to establish it as a viable HLW vitrification technology. The greater than two year effort conducted with the International Radioecology Laboratory in the Ukraine recently completed. The objectives of this study were: to assess the long-term impacts to the environment from radiation exposure in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (ChEZ); and to provide information on remediation guidelines and ecological risk assessment within radioactively contaminated territories around the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP) based on the results of long-term field monitoring, analytical measurements, and numerical modeling of soils and groundwater radioactive contamination.

Marra, J.; Fox, K.; Farfan, E.; Jannik, T.

2009-12-08T23:59:59.000Z

274

A postmortem assessment of environmental compliance of a high-level radioactive waste repository, Hanford Site, Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to the accessible environment, a period of time during which the waste must be contained within the barrier, and acceptable release rates from the barrier. Based on these generic standards, a postmortem assessment of the potential for environmental compliance... regulatory time frame. The degree of regulatory geochemical retardation needed in the system in order to guarantee compliance with cumulative mass release limits at the accessible environment over a period of 10, 000 years is evaluated for the nuclides...

Petrini, Rudolf Harald Wilhelm

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

275

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix D: Environmental Synopsis for the Depleted UF6 Conversion Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS APPENDIX D: ENVIRONMENTAL SYNOPSIS FOR THE DEPLETED UF 6 CONVERSION PROJECT Environmental Synopsis D-2 Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS ENVIRONMENTAL SYNOPSIS FOR THE DEPLETED UF 6 CONVERSION PROJECT (Solicitation No. DE-RP05-01OR22717) October 2002 Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois Prepared for Office of Site Closure - Oak Ridge Office (EM-32) Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. October 2002 iii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 2 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................

276

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix D: Environmental Synopsis for the Depleted UF6 Conversion Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS APPENDIX D: ENVIRONMENTAL SYNOPSIS FOR THE DEPLETED UF 6 CONVERSION PROJECT Environmental Synopsis D-2 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS ENVIRONMENTAL SYNOPSIS FOR THE DEPLETED UF 6 CONVERSION PROJECT (Solicitation No. DE-RP05-01OR22717) October 2002 Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois Prepared for Office of Site Closure - Oak Ridge Office (EM-32) Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. October 2002 iii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................. 3 3

277

Current Progress and Future Plans for the DOE Office of Environmental Management International Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has collaborated with various international institutes for many years on radioactive waste management challenges of mutual concern. Currently, DOE-EM is performing collaborative work with researchers at the Khlopin Radium Institute and the SIA Radon Institute in Russia and the Ukraine's International Radioecology Laboratory to explore issues related to high-level waste and to investigate experience and technologies that could support DOE-EM site cleanup needs. Specific initiatives include: - Application of the Cold Crucible Induction Heated Melter to DOE Wastes - SIA Radon and Savannah River National Laboratory; - Improved Solubility and Retention of Troublesome Components in SRS and Hanford Waste Glasses - Khlopin Radium Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory; - Long-term Impacts from Radiation/Contamination within the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, International Radioecology Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory. This paper provides an overview of the status of the current International Program task activities. The paper will also provide insight into the future direction for the program. Specific ties to the current DOE-EM technology development multi-year planning effort will be highlighted as well as opportunities for future international collaborations. (authors)

Gerdes, K.D. [Office of Engineering and Technology, Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC (United States); Marra, J. C.; Peeler, D.K.; Harbour, M.J.J.R.; Fox, K.M. [Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC (United States); Vienna, J.D. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA (United States); Aloy, A.S. [Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg (Russian Federation); Stefanovsky, S.V. [SIA Radon, Moscow (Russian Federation); Bondarkov, M.D. [International Radioecology Laboratory, Slavutych (Ukraine)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

CURRENT PROGRESS AND FUTURE PLANS FOR THE DOE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has collaborated with various international institutes for many years on radioactive waste management challenges of mutual concern. Currently, DOE-EM is performing collaborative work with researchers at the Khlopin Radium Institute and the SIA Radon Institute in Russia and the Ukraine's International Radioecology Laboratory to explore issues related to high-level waste and to investigate experience and technologies that could support DOE-EM site cleanup needs. Specific initiatives include: (1) Application of the Cold Crucible Induction Heated Melter to DOE Wastes--SIA Radon and Savannah River National Laboratory; (2) Improved Solubility and Retention of Troublesome Components in SRS and Hanford Waste Glasses--Khlopin Radium Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory; and (3) Long-term Impacts from Radiation/Contamination within the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone--International Radioecology Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory. This paper provides an overview of the status of the current International Program task activities. The paper will also provide insight into the future direction for the program. Specific ties to the current DOE-EM technology development multi-year planning effort will be highlighted as well as opportunities for future international collaborations.

Marra, J; Kurt D Gerdes, K; David Peeler, D; John Harbour, J; Kevin Fox, K

2007-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

279

Proceedings of the US Department of Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The fifth of a series of waste minimization (WMIN)/reduction workshops (Waste Reduction Workshop V) was held at the Little Tree Inn in Idaho Falls, Idaho, on July 24--26, 1990. The workshops are held under the auspices of the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM). The purpose of this workshop was to provide a forum for sharing site activities in WMIN/reduction planning. Topics covered were management commitment, organizational structure, goal setting, reporting requirements, data bases and tracking systems, pollution prevention, awareness and incentives, information exchange, process waste assessment (PWA) implementation, and recycling internal and external. The workshops assist DOE waste-generating sites in implementing WMIN/reduction programs, plans, and activities, thus providing for optimal waste reduction within the DOE complex. All wastes are considered within this discipline: liquid, solid, and airborne, within the categories of high-level waste (HLW), transuranic waste (TRU), low-level waste (LLW), hazardous waste, and mixed waste.

Not Available

1990-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2012 5, 2012 CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 2, 2004 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2 BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project Volume 2 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Figures BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendices BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project June 23, 2004 EIS-0026-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Commingled Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 7, 2004 EIS-0169-SA-08: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington March 12, 2004 EA-1486: Final Environmental Assessment East and West Diversion Screening Proposal Methow Valley Irrigation District Project

282

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-005337: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 24, 2011 Online Registration Dates Set for 2011 Hanford Tours RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will open online registration on March 8 for tours of the Hanford Site and on March 15 for B Reactor-specific tours. February 24, 2011 Praveen Thallapally | photo courtesy of Pacific Northwest National Lab 10 Questions for a Materials Chemist: Praveen Thallapally Dr. Thallapally gave us an inside look at how he's working to advance carbon capture and geothermal technologies, developing a new class of

283

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

284

Pacific Northwest Laboratory: Director`s overview of research performed for DOE Office of Health And Environmental Research  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A significant portion of the research undertaken at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) is focused on the strategic programs of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Office of Health and Environmental Research (OHER). These programs, which include Environmental Processes (Subsurface Science, Ecosystem Function and Response, and Atmospheric Chemistry), Global Change (Climate Change, Environmental Vulnerability, and Integrated Assessments), Biotechnology (Human Genome and Structural Biology), and Health (Health Effects and Medical Applications), have been established by OHER to support DOE business areas in science and technology and environmental quality. PNL uses a set of critical capabilities based on the Laboratory`s research facilities and the scientific and technological expertise of its staff to help OHER achieve its programmatic research goals. Integration of these capabilities across the Laboratory enables PNL to assemble multidisciplinary research teams that are highly effective in addressing the complex scientific and technical issues associated with OHER-sponsored research. PNL research efforts increasingly are focused on complex environmental and health problems that require multidisciplinary teams to address the multitude of time and spatial scales found in health and environmental research. PNL is currently engaged in research in the following areas for these OHER Divisions: Environmental Sciences -- atmospheric radiation monitoring, climate modeling, carbon cycle, atmospheric chemistry, ecological research, subsurface sciences, bioremediation, and environmental molecular sciences; Health Effects and Life Sciences -- cell/molecular biology, and biotechnology; Medical Applications and Biophysical Research -- analytical technology, and radiological and chemical physics. PNL`s contributions to OHER strategic research programs are described in this report.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Environmental Assessments (EA) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 28, 1995 September 28, 1995 EA-0981: Final Environmental Assessment Solid Waste Retrieval Complex, Enhanced Radioactive and Mixed Waste Storage Facility, Infrastructure Upgrades, and Central Waste Support Complex, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 22, 1995 EA-1092: Final Environmental Assessment Decontamination and Dismantlement September 8, 1995 EA-1097: Final Environmental Assessment Solid waste Disposal - Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada September 8, 1995 EA-1107: Final Environmental Assessment Construction and Operation of a Office Building at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center September 8, 1995 EA-1087: Final Environmental Assessment Proposed Induction Linac System Experiments in Building 51B at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

286

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 21, 2012 May 21, 2012 CX-008716: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Tacoma Power Chehalis- Covington 230-Kilovolt (kV) Line/Convert Microwave Signals From Analog To Digital CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration May 18, 2012 CX-009096: Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Customs and Border Protection Non-Intrusive Inspection Tests CX(s) Applied: B3.10, B3.11 Date: 05/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Pacific Northwest Site Office May 17, 2012 CX-008717: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation of Wood Poles on Centralia B Street No. 1 for Proposed Centralia City Light May Street Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/17/2012

287

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review of Allegations Involving Review of Allegations Involving Potential Misconduct by a Senior Office of Environmental Management Official Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 29,2009 MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Review of Allegations Involving Potential Misconduct by a Senior Office of Environmental Management Official INTRODUCTION In September 2009, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) received multiple allegations concerning improprieties by a senior official with the Office of Environmental Management. The allegations involved potential violations of political activity restrictions, lack of impartiality i n performing official duties, misuse of position, and other related misconduct. Specific allegations concerned: 1. Orchestrating a $9 million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery

288

Environmental Studies and Planning Page 147Sonoma State University 2008-2010 Catalog Department Office  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in environmental studies energy management and Design Water Quality and hazardous materials management minor / Energy Management and Design Laura Watt / Environmental Conservation and Restoration, Planning *Faculty and the environment energy management and Design environmental conservation and restoration Outdoor Leadership

Ravikumar, B.

289

ANL technical support program for DOE Office of Environmental Management. Annual report, October 1994--September 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A program was established for the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) to evaluate factors that are anticipated to affect waste glass reaction during repository disposal, especially in an unsaturated environment typical of what may be expected for the proposed Yucca Mountain repository site. This report covers progress in FY 1995 on the following tasks: (1) Tests are ongoing to evaluate and compare the reactivity of fully radioactive glasses with that of glasses having the same compositions except for the absence of radionuclides under conditions representative of a high-level waste repository environment. Data from these tests will be used to evaluate the effect of radionuclides on the glass corrosion behavior and to determine the disposition of the radionuclides as the glass corrodes. Static dissolution tests and unsaturated tests are being conducted with several Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) and West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) glasses. (2) A series of static dissolution tests is being performed to compare the corrosion behavior of nuclear waste glasses made with SRL 131 and SRL 202 frits at different S/V ratios. The S/V ratio affects the extent to which dissolved glass species are diluted; the solution chemistry then affects continued glass dissolution. The solutions generated in tests at high S/V ratios are conducive to the formation of alteration phases that may be deleterious to the glass. After long time periods, the glass dissolution rates of both glasses increase coincidentally with the formation of analcime and other alteration phases. However, the release of radionuclides from the glasses into solution is controlled by their individual solubilities.

Bates, J.K.; Buck, E.C.; Dietz, N.L.; DiSanto, T.; Ebert, W.L. [and others

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage Of Hanford Tank Wastes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1995/01eis0212_cl.html[6/27/2011 1:02:59 PM] 1995/01eis0212_cl.html[6/27/2011 1:02:59 PM] Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage Of Hanford Tank Wastes DOE/EIS-0212 VOLUME 1 OF 2 VOLUME 1 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SAFE INTERIM STORAGE OF HANFORD TANK WASTES Hanford Site Richland, Washington October, 1995 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY NUCLEAR WASTE PROGRAM LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE

291

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2006 November 29, 2006 EIS-0183: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Windy Point Wind Energy Project June 26, 2006 EIS-0397: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement Lyle Falls Fishway Project May 1, 2006 EIS-0384: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chief Joseph Hatchery Program March 31, 2006 EA-1547: Finding of No Significant Impact Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site March 1, 2006 EA-1547: Final Environmental Assessment Sodium Residual Reaction/Removal and Other Deactivation Work Activities, Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 17, 2006 EIS-0391: Notice to Extend Scoping Period Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA

292

EIS-0203F; DOE Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and INEL Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary-1995.html[6/27/2011 12:08:32 PM] Summary-1995.html[6/27/2011 12:08:32 PM] SUMMARY DOE/EIS-0203-F Department of Energy Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary April 1995 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Idaho Operations Office Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 1995 Dear Citizen: This is a summary of the Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement. The Department of Energy and

293

Top 20 Ways to Go Green at Work (and Save the University Money!) Office Depot's three environmental aspirations are to "Buy Green," "Be Green" and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Top 20 Ways to Go Green at Work (and Save the University Money!) Office Depot's three environmental aspirations are to "Buy Green," "Be Green" and "Sell Green." · By "Buying Green," we have achieved the widest "green product assortment" in the office products industry - approximately 3,500 products with recycled

Borenstein, Elhanan

294

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 12, 2011 December 12, 2011 CX-008010: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small-Scale Research and Development Projects Using Nanoscale Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 12/12/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office December 9, 2011 CX-007481: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007479: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project

295

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 12, 2011 August 12, 2011 CX-006472: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006468: Categorical Exclusion Determination Testing Subcontractor for Fenestration System Energy Performance Rating Development and Research CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Everett, Washington

296

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000348: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington

297

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 9, 2010 March 9, 2010 CX-001183: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Rock Creek-John Day Number 1 Spacers CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/09/2010 Location(s): Klickitat County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 3, 2010 CX-001185: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Spacer Dampers Along the Wautoma-Rock Creek Number 1 500 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Yakima County, Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 1, 2010 CX-001040: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Coalition Petroleum Reduction Project - Conversion CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

298

White House science office 'needs more focus', says panel  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... [WASHINGTON] The Office of ... of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in the US White House should have a more tightly ...

COLIN MACILWAIN

1997-04-03T23:59:59.000Z

299

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1992 to the DOE Office of Energy Research. Part 2, Environmental sciences  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 1992 Annual Report from Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) to the US Department of Energy (DOE) describes research in environment and health conducted during fiscal year 1992. This report consists of four volumes oriented to particular segments of the PNL program, describing research performed for the DOE Office of Health and Environmental Research in the Office of Energy Research. The parts of the 1992 Annual Report are: Biomedical Sciences; Environmental Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences; and Physical Sciences. This Report is Part 2: Environmental Sciences. Included in this report are developments in Subsurface Science, Terrestrial Science, Laboratory-Directed Research and Development, Interactions with Educational Institutions, Technology Transfer, Publications, and Presentations. The research is directed toward developing a fundamental understanding of subsurface and terrestrial systems as a basis for both managing these critical resources and addressing environmental problems such as environmental restoration and global change. The Technology Transfer section of this report describes a number of examples in which fundamental research is laying the groundwork for the technology needed to resolve important environmental problems. The Interactions with Educational Institutions section of the report illustrates the results of a long-term, proactive program to make PNL facilities available for university and preuniversity education and to involve educational institutions in research programs. The areas under investigation include the effect of geochemical and physical phenomena on the diversity and function of microorganisms in deep subsurface environments, ways to address subsurface heterogeneity, and ways to determine the key biochemical and physiological pathways (and DNA markers) that control nutrient, water, and energy dynamics in arid ecosystems and the response of these systems to disturbance and climatic change.

Grove, L.K. [ed.; Wildung, R.E.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 19, 2002 July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-95: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-94: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Covington District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-96: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-71: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, located in Umatilla and Sherman Counties, Oregon and Benton and Klickitat Counties, Washington July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-70: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 8, 2002 EIS-0189: Notice of Intent Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Disposal of Immobilized

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1982 to the DOE Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Protection, Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Part 5. Environmental and occupational protection, assessment, and engineering  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Part 5 of the 1982 Annual Report to the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Protection, Safety and Emergency Preparedness presents Pacific Northwest Laboratory's progress on work performed for the Office of Environmental Programs, Office of Operational Safety, and the Office of Nuclear Safety. The report is in three sections, introduced by blue divider pages, corresponding to the program elements: Technology Impacts, Environmental and Safety Engineering, Operational and Environmental Safety. In each section, articles describe progress made during FY 1982 on individual projects, as identified by the Field Task Proposal/Agreement. Authors of these articles represent a broad spectrum of capabilities derived from various segments of the Laboratory, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the work.

Bair, W.J.

1983-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Management Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew April 14, 2010 Providence RI Washington Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 3 Presentation Overview * EO 13514 - Strategic Sustainability Plans * DOE's approach * EISA section 432 update * Outreach Opportunities - Federal Energy Management Awards - Energy Empowers Campaign - GovEnergy Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 4 EO13514 Sustainability Plans Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 5 EO 13514 Goals In addition to GHG goals, the EO requires agencies to meet sustainability targets, including: * 30% reduction in vehicle fleet petroleum use by 2020; * 26% reduction in potable, industrial, landscaping, and agricultural water consumption by 2020;

303

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew October 20, 2010 Rapid City, SD Washington Update 2 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview * FEMP Updates * GHG Guidance Update * EISA Section 432 Update * Mark Your Calendar 3 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov * Richard Kidd is leaving FEMP - Will become Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Energy and Sustainability - Skye Schell will assume the role of interim Program Manager * Jesse Feinberg (Energetics) departed over the summer to attend grad school Columbia * Sarah Mabbitt (smabbitt@energetics.com)

304

Washington, DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of. Energy of. Energy Washington, DC' 26585 , The Honorable Gene Eriquez .~ City Hall I55 Deer Hill Avenue + Danbury/Connecticut 06180 .. -r. - Dear Mayor Eriquez: Secretary of Energy Hazel O!Leary has .announced a knew approach -to openness in. the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications with the public. In support of th,is initiative, we are,pleased to forward the enclosed information, related to the former Sperry Products,'.Inc. site in your jurisdiction ,that performed,work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. Th,is informatipn is provided,for your information, use, and retenti~oh. DOE's Formeily Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for. identification of sites used by'DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and,

305

Department Washington,  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington, of Energy DC 20545 Mr. Roy J. Villella, Jr. Assistant Secretary Diebold, Incorporated 818 Mulberry Road, S.E. F. 0. Box 8230 Canton, Ohio 44711-8230 Dear Mr..Villella: Enclosed is your copy of the signed consent form for the survey of those portions of the Diebold property used by the former owner, Herring Hall and Marvin Safe Company, to machine uranium rod for the Manhattan Engineer District. I have directed our contractor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to coordinate the specific time and details for the visit and survey. Mr. Woodrow Cottrell, ORNL, or his representative, will be contacting you in this regard. If you have any questions regarding the survey, please call me at (301) 353-5439. Sincerely, Andrew Wallo III, Designation

306

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Management Program Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update Dr. Timothy Unruh October 25-26, 2011 Philadelphia, PA 2 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview  Federal Government Goals and Status  FEMP Update  UESC Program Overview and Goals  Mark Your Calendar: Spring 2012 FUPWG 3 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov FEMP's Mission FEMP provides the services, tools, and expertise to Federal agencies to help them achieve their legislated and executive ordered energy, greenhouse gas, and water goals. This is delivered through project financing services, technical assistance, and communications and training. 4 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov

307

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE TO RECORD HILL WIND LLC FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A WIND ENERGY PROJECT IN ROXBURY, MAINE U.S. Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program Office Washington, DC 20585 July 2011 DOE/EA-1824 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to issue a loan guarantee to Record Hill Wind LLC (Record Hill) for the construction of a 50.6 megawatt (MW) wind energy project located in Roxbury, Maine. 1 DOE has prepared this Final Environmental Assessment (EA) in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 United States Code [USC] 4321, et. seq.) Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations

308

Digitizing the Administrative Records of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (Em) and Office of Legacy Management (LM) Ohio Sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As former weapons sites close and are transitioned to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM), continued public involvement is essential for the successful turnover of long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS and M) activities. During the environmental remediation process, public participation was a key factor in cleanup completion. The same level of commitment to encourage active public participation is true for the LTS and M activities at the LM sites, such as the Miamisburg Closure Project and the Fernald Closure Project. Community members participate in the transition and the decision-making processes for LTS and M as they did for the selection of response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) cleanup process. [1] A key part of the post-closure activities for the Ohio Sites transitioning to LM from the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) is the preservation of site history and stakeholder involvement in the LTS and M activities that will continue during post-closure. In meeting the regulatory requirements of providing the CERCLA Administrative Record Reading Room for public access and to ensure that appropriate records are retrievable and available for all stakeholders, a decision was made to digitize the Miamisburg Closure Project and the Fernald Closure Project Administrative Records. This decision was, in part, based on the information and lessons learned from the digitization of the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) CERCLA Administrative Records (AR). The Ohio Sites effort was expanded to include the Living History Project from the Fernald Closure Project. In most cases, the CERCLA AR maintained by EM closure sites and transitioned to LM will provide adequate baselines for identifying and capturing the information required by LM for post-closure stewardship of the sites. The AR established under Section 113(k) [2] of CERCLA serves two primary purposes. First, the record contains those documents that form the basis for selection of a response action and comply with Section 113(j) [3]; judicial review of any issue concerning the adequacy of any response action is limited to the record. Second, Section 113(k) [2] requires that the AR act as a vehicle for public participation in selecting a response action. The AR is the body of documents that 'forms the basis' for the selection of a particular response action at a site and contains historic information that has future study value by scholars, historians, regulators, and other stakeholders. (authors)

Powell, J. [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States); Williams, K.; Walpole, S. [S.M. Stoller Corporation, Miamisburg, Ohio (United States); McKinney, R. [Source One Management, Inc., Denver, Colorado (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

Office of Information Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Billing System Bureau: Department of Energy Project Unique ID: 01 9-1 0-01 -22-02-3048-00 Date: 02/08/2008 A. CONTACT INFORMATION 1) Who is the person completing this document? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.21), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.21, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 2) Who is the system owner? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.2 l), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS- 1.2 1, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 3) Who is the system manager for this system or application?

310

Idaho's Radiological and Environmental Sciences Laboratory , OAS-L-12-02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho's Radiological and Idaho's Radiological and Environmental Sciences Laboratory OAS-L-12-02 February 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 February 21, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE FROM: Daniel M. Weeber, Director Eastern Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Idaho's Radiological and Environmental Sciences Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy owns and operates the Radiological and Environmental Sciences Laboratory (RESL) through the Idaho Operations Office (Idaho). RESL is a reference measurements laboratory specializing in analytical chemistry, radiation measurements and calibrations, and quality assurance. RESL had been located at the Idaho National Laboratory

311

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 7, 2013 January 7, 2013 CX-009785: Categorical Exclusion Determination Roosevelt Radio Station Emergency Generator Removal and Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 3, 2013 CX-010563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest National Laboratory- Non-Wire Methods for Transmission Congestion Management Through Predictive Simulation and Optimization CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/03/2013 Location(s): Washington, North Carolina, Illinois, Oregon Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy December 27, 2012 CX-009699: Categorical Exclusion Determination Continuation of Yakama Nation Sturgeon Management Project CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 12/27/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington

312

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 5, 2013 April 5, 2013 CX-010154: Categorical Exclusion Determination Digital Communication System Upgrade Project: 'D' Analog System Retirement and #WC SONET Ring CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/05/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010094: Categorical Exclusion Determination Activity-Specific Categorical Exclusion for Deep Borehole Drilling, Sampling, and Characterization for the Proposed Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco, Washington to the Hanford Site 200 East Area CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington

313

Environmental Monitoring Plan, United States Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes environmental monitoring activities at Hanford Reservation. Attention is focused on effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance. All Hanford contractors reviewed potential sources of contamination. A facility effluent monitoring plan was written for each facility with the potential to release significant quantities of hazardous materials, addressing both radiological and nonradiological effluent monitoring. The environmental surveillance program assesses onsite and offsite environmental impacts and offsite human health exposures. The program monitors air, surface water, sediment, agricultural products, vegetation, soil, and wildlife. In addition, independent onsite surveillance is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Hanford Site effluent controls in order to comply with applicable environmental standards and regulations.

Not Available

1994-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

314

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 12, 2003 February 12, 2003 EIS-0286: Notice of Intent Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, WA February 12, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-121: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 10, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-120: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Benton County, Washington January 31, 2003 EIS-0325: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Schultz-Hanford Transmission Line Project January 29, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-119: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish-Murray No. 1 Transmission Line January 27, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-118: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Holcomb-Naselle 115kV,

315

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 5, 2002 September 5, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-107: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program September 2, 2002 EIS-0169-SA-05: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington August 30, 2002 EIS-0332: Final Environmental Impact Statement McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project August 29, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-99: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Final Environmental Impact Statement - Olympia-Grand Coulee No.1 August 22, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-105: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 21, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-104: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 1, 2002 EIS-0344: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement

316

DOE/EA-1444: Environmental Assessment for the Construction of New Office Building, Child-Care Facility, Parking Garage, And Storm Water Retention Pond (September 2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT For the Construction of New Office Building, Child-Care Facility, Parking Garage, And Storm Water Retention Pond United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory September 2002 DOE/EA-1444 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT For the Construction of New Office Building, Child-Care Facility, Parking Garage, And Storm Water Retention Pond United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory September 2002 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Cover Sheet Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to upgrade facilities and infrastructure at the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Morgantown, WV, through acquisition of a 5-acre

317

Recent developments: Washington focus  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Congress reconvened on January 23, but most of Washington`s January new involves the Administration. DOE sent two letters to USEC customers, awarded a contract for the independent financial review of the enrichment program, and released a plan for demonstrating AVLIS by 1992. A General Accounting Office (GAO) report investigating the impact of imports of Soviet EUP into the US was made public. Both Congress and the administration are reportedly considering a full-scope US-Soviet Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation. Finally, published reports indicate Congress may consider ending the customs user fee which levies a charge of 0.17% on the value of all imported goods. The fee is felt to violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and is not based on recovering actual Customs costs for processing a good. The fee brings the Treasury over $700 million per year, but the business community plans to lobby hard for its outright elimination or a change in authority to collect the fee based on actual costs.

NONE

1990-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

318

Clean Cities: Western Washington Clean Cities (Seattle) coalition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

solar industry and delivered multiple third party-financed solar projects for US cable companies. He earned a BA in Economics and Environmental studies from Western Washington...

319

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 15, 2013 January 15, 2013 EA-1949: FERC Draft Environmental Assessment Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA December 27, 2012 EM's Office of River Protection has successfully removed waste from a tenth storage tank at the Hanford site. Located in C Farm, C-109 is one of 16 underground tanks ranging in capacity from 55,000 to 530,000 gallons. Retrieval of Tenth Single-shell Tank Complete at Hanford's Office of River Protection RICHLAND, Wash. - The Office of River Protection (ORP) has completed retrieval of radioactive and chemical waste from the tenth underground waste storage tank at the Hanford site. December 17, 2012 CX-009746: Categorical Exclusion Determination Upstream Ultrasonic Processing for Small Producers: Preventative Maintenance for Paraffin Management

320

PACIFIC NORTHWEST: CLIMATE IMPACTS GROUP http://www.cses.washington.edu/cig/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Tualatin, Oregon · King County, Washington (County Council, Office of the Executive, Department of Natural · Tacoma Power and Light · Thurston County, Washington State Level · Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Colorado at Boulder, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 30, 2013 July 30, 2013 Matt McCormick, manager of the Richland Operations Office, commends a large group of Hanford workers for the 15-million-ton milestone at a public event at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility. Disposal Facility Reaches 15-Million-Ton Milestone RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) - a massive landfill for low-level radioactive and hazardous waste at the Hanford site - has achieved a major cleanup milestone. July 30, 2013 Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz tours the 200 West Pump and Treat System, which treats chemical and radionuclide contamination in Hanford's groundwater. Pictured, left to right, are Special Assistant to the Secretary Mark Appleton, Bob Popielarczyk of CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company, Special Assistant to the Secretary T.J. Augustine, Secretary Ernest Moniz, EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga and DOE Richland Operations Office Deputy Manager Doug Shoop.

322

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 22, 2012 June 22, 2012 CX-008692: Categorical Exclusion Determination Amendment Number 2 to the Alcoa Power Sales Agreement CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 06/22/2012 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 21, 2012 CX-008695: Categorical Exclusion Determination Munro Control Center Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008694: Categorical Exclusion Determination Acquisition and Disposition of Property CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Washington, Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008693: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Structure Replacements on the Chehalis-Centralia No. 2 115 Kilovolt Transmission Line

323

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 44th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XLIV) that were received on or before June 3, 1996. The QAP is designed to test the quality of environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by it`s contractors. Since 1976, samples have been prepared and analyzed by the Environmental measurements Laboratory.

Sanderson, C.G.; Greenlaw, P.

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Albuquerque Operations Office  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

%r © J~4 %r © J~4 aDepartment of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400 Albuquerue. New Mexico 87118 JUIl 0 198 Vicinity Property No. CA-401 _ U l Address; Mayer Street Bridgeville, Pennsylvania Cyclops Corporation 650 Washington Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15228 Dear Sir: Under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, Public Law 95-604, the Department of Energy (DOE) is authorized to conduct remedial action at properties contaminated with residual radioactive material from inactive uranium mill sites. Evaluation of your property identified above has revealed the presence of residual radioactive material in excess of standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Therefore, your property has been formally included by DOE for remedial action in the Uranium Mill Tailings

325

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Solutions, Solutions, LLC - October 2011 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC - October 2011 October 2011 Industrial Hygiene Surveillance of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Industrial Hygiene Program Strategy and Implementation of the Hanford Concerns Council Recommendations [HIAR-ORP-2011-10-26] Staff from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), in coordination with the Office of River Protection (ORP), reviewed the status and programmatic health of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) industrial hygiene program relative to the Hanford Concerns Council (HCC) Independent Review Panel (IRP) report on Chemical Vapors Industrial

326

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

327

Pacific Northwest Site Office P.O. BOX 350, Kg-42  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pacific Northwest Site Office Pacific Northwest Site Office P.O. BOX 350, Kg-42 Richland, Washington 99352 JAN 1 8 2019 MEMORANDUM FOR SCOTT B. HARRIS, GENERAL COUNSEL OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL FROM: SUBJECT: GC- I , HQ JULIE K. ERlCKSON PACIFIC NORTHWEST SITE OFFICE 20 1 1 ANNUAL NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) PLANNING SUMMARY DOE 0 45 1.1B requires Secretarial Officers and Heads of Field Organizations to submit a Annual NEPA Planning Summary to the Office of General Counsel. We have consulted your December 8,201 0, memorandum, and guidance posted on the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliailce (GC-54) web site, and have no NEPA activities to report. If you have any questions, please contact me, or your staff may contact Theresa Aldridge, Operations Division, at (509) 372-4508, or Peter Siebach, Integrated Support Center - Chicago

328

The Honorable Gary Loster 1315 S. Washington Avenue  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office of Eastern Area Programs Office of Environmental Restoration Enclosures . & Chemical, Saginaw, MI 6. Bruchmann, State of Michigan 8 Printed wth soy Ink on recycled paper -.-...

329

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 43rd set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XLIII) that were received on or before December 1, 1995. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 2 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Greenlaw, P.

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 42st set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XLII) that were received on or before June 1, 1995. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 2 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Greenlaw, P.; Pan, V.

1995-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

331

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management quality assessment program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the soil inorganic analysis of the 45th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XLV) that were received on or before December 2, 1996.

Sanderson, C.G.; Greenlaw, P.

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

2014 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) Office of Environmental Management (EM) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Office of Fossil Energy (FE) Office of...

333

Office of the US Nuclear Waste Negotiator  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of the US Nuclear Waste Negotiator was created as an independent federal agency by the US Congress pursuant to the 1987 amendments to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. The office, which was authorized by Congress for 5 years following the enactment of the 1987 amendments, is headquartered in Boise, Idaho, and maintains a liaison office in Washington DC. The negotiator is charged with the responsibility of attempting to find a state or Indian tribe willing to host a repository or monitored retrievable storage (MRS) facility at a technically qualified site on reasonable terms. The negotiator is instructed to negotiate with any state or Indian tribe that expresses an interest in hosting a repository or MRS facility. The negotiator will formally submit the negotiated agreement and environmental assessment to Congress, and the agreement will become effective when acted on by Congress and signed by the President into law.

Leroy, D.H.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

The BioEnergy Science Center (BESC) is a U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Research Center supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science Pseudo-lignin Chemistry and Its Impact  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The BioEnergy Science Center (BESC) is a U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Research Center and Biochemistry, BioEnergy Science Center Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA *Presenter: arthur by the DOE office of Biological and Environmental Research through the BioEnergy Science Center (BESC). 10 µm

Das, Suman

335

OFFICE ERGONOMICS A Self-Assessment  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

OFFICE ERGONOMICS A Self-Assessment Guide Environmental Health and Safety Office safety, along with additional information on ergonomics, is also available through the Dalhousie Safety Office

Brownstone, Rob

336

Report: Removal of EM Projects from the GAO High Risk List: Strategies for Improving the Effectiveness of Project and Contract Management in the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REPORT TO THE REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Removal of EM Projects from the GAO High Risk List: Strategies for Improving the Effectiveness of Project and Contract Management in the Office of Environmental Management Submitted by the EMAB Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee December 5, 2011 Introduction: This report provides a comprehensive summary of the work performed by the Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee (APMS) of the Environmental Management Advisory Board, since tasking in March 2010. In particular, this report includes the summary observations developed and recommendations previously approved by the EMAB on the Subcommittee's work and presented to the then Assistant Secretary of Environmental Management (EM). As the

337

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 722 JACKSON PLACE, N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. April 30, 1981 MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL COUNSELS, NEPA LIAISONS AND PARTICIPANTS IN SCOPING SUBJECT: Scoping Guidance As part of its continuing oversight of the implementation of the NEPA regulations, the Council on Environmental Quality has been investigating agency experience with scoping. This is the process by which the scope of the issues and alternatives to be examined in an EIS is determined. In a project led by Barbara Bramble of the General Counsel's staff the Council asked federal agencies to report their scoping experiences; Council staff held meetings and workshops in all regions of the country to discuss scoping practice; and a contract study was performed for the Council to investigate what techniques work best for

338

Find Funding | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Find Funding Find Funding Funding Opportunities Grants & Contracts Support Award Search Find Funding Early Career Research Program Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 Find Funding Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Additional information on funding opportunities, including program contacts and general program announcements can be found on the SC program offices' funding opportunities pages: Advanced Scientific Research Computing (ASCR) funding opportunities information Basic Energy Sciences (BES) funding opportunities information Biological & Environmental Research (BER) funding opportunities information Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) funding opportunities information

339

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 16, 2004 January 16, 2004 EIS-0246-SA-37: Supplement Analysis Wildlife Mitigation Program, On the Spokane Indian Reservation, near Wellpinit, Stevens County, Washington November 10, 2003 EIS-0349: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project October 2, 2003 EA-0307-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Colville Resident Trout Hatchery Project Supplement Analysis September 5, 2003 EIS-0349: Draft Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project July 21, 2003 EIS-0317: Record of Decision Kangley-Echo Lake Transmission Line Project July 14, 2003 EIS-1069-SA-07: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Kilickitat Fisheries Project, Noxious Weed Control at Cle Elum and Jack Creek, Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility and Jack Creek

340

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 19, 2013 June 19, 2013 A Hanford site volunteer helps a Boy Scout practice the Pull, Aim, Squeeze, Sweep, or PASS, fire extinguishing technique at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center in Richland. Local Scouts Train with Hanford Safety Experts - 52 Boy Scouts Earn Merit Badges at the HAMMER Training Facility RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford site services contractor Mission Support Alliance (MSA) hosted a unique opportunity for 52 local Boy Scouts at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center during two consecutive weekends recently. June 14, 2013 EA-1562-SA-1: Supplement Analysis Final Environmental Assessment of Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington June 4, 2013

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18, 2011 18, 2011 Hanford to Host ISMS Safety Workshop in Kennewick: Abstracts Due in June for September Event RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Hanford will hold its annual DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Champions Workshop on September 12-15, 2011, at the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick, Wash. May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Final Environmental Assessment Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project, Walla Walla and Columbia Counties, Washington May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Mitigation Acton Plan Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Finding of No Significant Impact Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 13, 2011 CX-005809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

342

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 13, 2012 July 13, 2012 First of Hanford's Highly Radioactive Sludge Moved Away from River RICHLAND, Wash. - Workers have started moving highly radioactive material, called sludge, awayfrom the Columbia River, marking a significant milestone in the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s cleanup of the Hanford Site in Washington State. July 9, 2012 EA-1912: Draft Environmental Assessment Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project Benton County, WA July 3, 2012 EIS-0312: Record of Decision (2012) Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision: Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Kalispel Tribe July 3, 2012 DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash. RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional

343

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Award |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Award Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Award September 22, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy (FE) announced today that the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) has received the Most Valuable Pollution Prevention Project (MVP2) award from the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable for lowering potential greenhouse gas emissions. This is the first time the SPR has captured the award for its commitment to pollution prevention, focusing on innovation, measurable results, transferability, commitment, and optimization of available project resources. "This is another example of the hard work and dedication by employees at

344

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Award |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Award Strategic Petroleum Reserve Receives Prestigious Environmental Award September 22, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy (FE) announced today that the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) has received the Most Valuable Pollution Prevention Project (MVP2) award from the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable for lowering potential greenhouse gas emissions. This is the first time the SPR has captured the award for its commitment to pollution prevention, focusing on innovation, measurable results, transferability, commitment, and optimization of available project resources. "This is another example of the hard work and dedication by employees at

345

Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory 2004 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This 2004 Annual Report describes the research and accomplishments of staff and users of the W.R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), located in Richland, Washington. EMSL is a multidisciplinary, national scientific user facility and research organization, operated by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research. The resources and opportunities within the facility are an outgrowth of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) commitment to fundamental research for understanding and resolving environmental and other critical scientific issues.

White, Julia C.

2005-04-17T23:59:59.000Z

346

EIS-0283DS Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Draft Environmental Impact Statement, April 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sheet Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Supplement) (DOE/EIS-0283-DS) Locations of Candidate Sites: Idaho, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the Supplement contact: For further information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Office of Fissile Materials Disposition U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 23786 Washington, DC 20026-3786 Voice: (202) 586-5368 Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance Office of Environment, Safety and Health U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW

347

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1981 to the DOE Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Protection, Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Part 5. Environmental and occupational protection, assessment, and engineering  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes research in environment, health, and safety conducted during fiscal year 1981. The five parts of the report are oriented to particular segments of the program. Parts 1 to 4 report on research performed for the DOE Office of Health and Environmental Research in the Office of Energy Research. Part 5 reports progress on all research performed for the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Protection, Safety and Emergency Preparedness. The parts are: Part 1: Biomedical Sciences under Program Manager, H. Drucker; Part 2: Ecological Sciences, under Program Manager, B.E. Vaughan; Part 3: Atmospheric Sciences under Program Manager, C.E. Elderkin; Part 4: Physical Sciences under Program Manager, J.M. Nielsen; and Part 5: Environmental and Occupational Protection, Assessment, and Engineering under Program Managers, D.L. Hessel, S. Marks, and W.A. Glass.

Glass, W.A.

1982-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Office of Information Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Bureau of Investigations Billing System Federal Bureau of Investigations Billing System Bureau: Department of Energy Project Unique ID: 01 9-10-01 -22-02-3028-00 Date: 02/08/2008 A. CONTACT INFORMATION 1) Who is the person completing this document? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.21), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.21, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 2) Who is the system owner? Joanne Csordas (HS-1.21), Office of Business Operations, Office of Resource Management, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.21, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20585, (301) 903-3573 3) Who is the system manager for this system or application?

349

Office of Indian Energy Announces New Staff  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy is pleased to announce the addition of new program staff in Washington, D.C. and Anchorage, Alaska. Since 2011, the Office of Indian...

350

EA-1958: Final Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Future Development in Proximity to the William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

351

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY This Work Plan Environmental Health and Safety, 206-543-0469 Call: or Seattle Fire Department 9-911 Radio Communication Center skylights, window cleaning. PROTECTION METHODS Specify protection methods for workers exposed to fall hazard

Wilcock, William

352

News From the D.C. Office: Seminars Explore Energy Policies & Technologies  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. 3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. News From the D.C. Office Seminars Explore Energy Policies & Technologies As part of our effort to communicate with customers and colleagues in the Washington area, the LBNL-D.C. office sponsors a series of breakfast seminars on research and policy topics of current interest. We've held six seminars this spring, each attended by 15 to 25 invited guests from the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Agency for International Development, nongovernmental organizations, Congressional committee staff, and D.C. staff of other national laboratories. On March 2, Jim McMahon of LBNL's Energy Analysis Program described LBNL's important contribution to national energy-efficiency standards for appliances. LBNL has provided analytical support to DOE for more than 15

353

,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050WA3","N3010WA3","N3020WA3","N3035WA3","N3045WA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Washington (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Washington...

354

Washington's power supply collapse  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... ON 25 July 1983 the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) defaulted on 2,250 million of municipal revenue bonds. This, ... has been polemical and accusatory in nature, blaming the Washington State Supreme Court, the Bonneville ...

Roger H. Bezdek

1985-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

355

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Group International - Group International - EA-2003-07 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International - EA-2003-07 October 23, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington Group International related to Falsification of Records and Procurement Deficiencies at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the investigation conducted by the Department of Energy (DOE) into allegations that RTS Wright Industries, LLC, (RTS), a supplier for which Washington Group International (WGI) had direct contractual responsibility, had falsified quality control inspection records. These records pertained to the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Supercompactor Glovebox Suite at the Idaho

356

Environmental Assessments (EA) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 31, 1996 August 31, 1996 EA-1086: Final Environmental Assessment Amendments to 10 CFR Part 835 (Revised Version - 6/98) August 7, 1996 EA-1160: Final Environmental Assessment Northeast Oregon Wildlife Mitigation Project July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Final Environmental Assessment Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic) July 15, 1996 EA-1149: Final Environmental Assessment Closure of the Waste Calcining Facility (CPP-633), Idaho National Engineering Laboratory June 8, 1996 EA-0930: Final Environmental Assessment Facility Operations at the U.S. DOE Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado June 1, 1996 EA-1068: Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment State Energy Conservation Program May 21, 1996 EA-1093: Final Environmental Assessment Surface Water Drainage System

357

Laser safety information for the Atomic, Molecular and Optical (AMO) Physics Labs at Lehigh University modified from the laser safety program developed by the office of Environmental  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Laser safety information for the Atomic, Molecular and Optical (AMO) Physics Labs at Lehigh University modified from the laser safety program developed by the office of Environmental Health and Safety using the following reference materials: I. American National Standards for Safe Use of Lasers - ANSI Z

Huennekens, John

358

Use of Facility Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To clarify and modify policies and procedures for management of Department of Energy (DOE) facility contractor employees located in the Washington, D.C., area. A facility contractor employee is any employee of either a contractor responsible for managing a Department-owned facility, such as a National Laboratory, or a subcontractor of such a contractor. Facility contractor means any contractor performing under a Management and Operating (M&O), Management and Integration (M&I), or Environmental Restoration Management Contractor (ERMC) contract awarded by a DOE contracting officer. Canceled by DOE O 350.2.

1999-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

359

Environmental Restoration Program project management plan for the DOE Oak Ridge Field Office Major System Acquisition OR-1. Revision 1, Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the early 1940s, the Manhattan Project was conducted in a regulatory and operational environment less sophisticated than today. Less was known of the measures needed to protect human health and safety and the environment from the dangers posed by radioactive and hazardous wastes, and experience in dealing with these hazardous materials has grown slowly. Certain hazards were recognized and dealt with from the beginning. However, the techniques used, though standard practices at the time, are now known to have been inadequate. Consequently, the DOE has committed to an aggressive program for cleaning up the environment and has initiated an Environmental Restoration Program involving all its field offices. The objective of this program is to ensure that inactive and surplus DOE facilities and sites meet current standards to protect human health and the environment. The objective of these activities is to ensure that risks posed to human health and safety and the environment by inactive sites and surplus facilities contaminated with radioactive, hazardous, and/or mixed wastes are either eliminated or reduced to prescribed safe levels. This Project Management Plan for Major System Acquisition OR-1 Project documents, communicates, and contributes to the evolution of, the management organizations, systems, and tools necessary to carry out effectively the long-range complex cleanup of the DOE sites on the Oak Ridge Reservation, and at the Paducah, Kentucky, and Piketon, Ohio, uranium enrichment plants managed by the Department of Energy Oak Ridge Field Office; the cleanup of off-site contamination resulting from past releases; and the Decontamination and Decommissioning of surplus DOE facilities at these installations.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

FY 1991 environmental research programs for the DOE Field Office, Nevada: Work plan and quarterly reports, fourth quarter report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This research includes a wide range of research and support activities associated with the Weapons Testing Program conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Ongoing and new environmental research programs to be conducted by DRI over the period of this contract include archaeological studies, site mitigation plans, compliance activities, and historical research; offsite community radiation monitoring support; environmental compliance activities related to state and federal regulations; hydrologic assessment of containment of underground nuclear detonations; hydrology/radionuclide investigations designed to better understand and predict the possible subsurface movement of radionuclides at the NTS; and support of various statistical and data management and design, laboratory, field, and administrative activities. In addition to these, archaeological site characterization, flood hazards for rail transportation, and paleofaunal investigations will be carried out in support of the Yucca Mountain Project. Other areas of the overall program which required DRI support are classified security activities, radiation safety and training, quality assurance and control, computer protection and historical data management, review and classification of DRI documents, and preparation of any special reports, e.g., quarterly reports, not included in the requirements of the individual projects. A new set of programs funded by the Office of Technology Development will be in place by the third quarter of FY 1991. These projects will address environmental restoration and waste management concerns, among other related topics. In accordance with specific contract requirements for each activity, DRI will produce summary, status and final reports and, in some cases, journal articles which will present the results of specific research efforts. This document contains the work plan, including project descriptions, tasks, deliverables and quarterly progress reports on each project for FY 1991.

NONE

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

FY 1991 environmental research programs for the Nevada Operations Office: Work plan and quarterly reports, first and second quarter reports  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The work carried out on behalf of the DOE by the Desert Research Institute (DRI) includes a wide range of research and support activities associated with the Weapons Testing Program conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Ongoing and new environmental research programs to be conducted by DRI over the period of this contract include archaeological studies, site mitigation plans, compliance activities, and historical research; offsite community radiation monitoring support; environmental compliance activities related to stat and federal regulations; hydrologic assessment of containment of underground nuclear detonations; hydrology/radionuclide investigations designed to better understand and predict the possible subsurface movement of radionuclides at the NTS; and support of various statistical and data management and design, laboratory, field, and administrative activities. In addition to these, archaeological site characterization, flood hazards for rail transportation, and paleofaunal investigations will be carried out in support of the Yucca Mountain Project. Other areas of the overall program which require DRI support are classified security activities, radiation safety and training, quality assurance and control, computer protection and historical data management, review and classification of DRI documents, and preparation of any special reports, e.g., quarterly reports, not included in the requirements of the individual projects. A new set of programs funded by the Office of Technology Development will be in place by the third quarter of FY 1991. These projects will address environmental restoration and waste management concerns, among other related topics. This document contains the Work Plan, including project descriptions, tasks, deliverables and quarterly progress reports on each project for FY 1991.

NONE

1991-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

EA-1931: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Assessment EA-1931: Final Environmental Assessment Keeler to Tillamook Transmission Line Rebuild Project, Washington and Tillamook Counties, Oregon Bonneville...

363

EA-1931: Draft Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Assessment EA-1931: Draft Environmental Assessment Keeler to Tillamook Transmission Line Rebuild, Washington and Tillamook Counties, Oregon Bonneville Power...

364

Summary Final Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Statement Final LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF ELEMENTAL MERCURY Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF ELEMENTAL MERCURY DOE/EIS-0423-S1 September 2013 SUMMARY AND GUIDE FOR STAKEHOLDERS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Washington, DC AVAILABILITY OF THIS FINAL LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF ELEMENTAL MERCURY SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For additional information on this Mercury Storage SEIS, contact: David Levenstein, Document Manager Office of Environmental Compliance (EM-11) U.S. Department of Energy Post Office Box 2612 Germantown, MD 20874 Website: http://www.mercurystorageeis.com Printed with soy ink on recycled paper FINAL LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND

365

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

sustainable strategies for energy, carbon and water. The master plan integrates many of these strategies to the climate challenge set by the ACUPCC. Our plan is the product of the collaboration of more than 100 Stewardship and Sustainability Advisory Board. These dedicated community members unleashed their imaginations

Hochberg, Michael

366

Office of the President One Washington Square  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

responsibilities include: conducting campus operations in a manner that does not create unreasonable risks of loss

Su, Xiao

367

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EMISSIONS ROUNDTABLE BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED for the use of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources #12;(II) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL .............................................................................................. 14 Wold, Per-Otto, Founding Partner and CEO, Point Carbon, Oslo, Norway ....... 10 APPENDIX Responses

368

US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office annual site environmental report, 1992. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report contains the environmental monitoring and assessment results for the Nevada Test Site for 1992. Monitoring and surveillance on and around the NTS by DOE contractors and Site user organizations during 1992 indicated that underground nuclear testing operations were conducted in compliance with regulations, i.e., the dose the maximally exposed offsite individual could have received was less than 0.15 percent of the guideline for air exposure. All 1992 nuclear events took place during the first three quarters of the calendar year prior to the Congressional testing moratorium. All discharges of radioactive liquids remained onsite in containment ponds, and there was no indication of potential migration of radioactivity to the offsite area through groundwater. Surveillance around the NTS indicated that airborne radioactivity from test operations was not detectable offsite, and no measurable net exposure to members of the offsite population was detected through the offsite dosimetry program. Using the CAP88-PC model and NTS radionuclide emissions data, the calculated maximum effective dose equivalent offsite would have been 0.012 mrem. Any person receiving this dose was also exposed to 78 mrem from natural background radiation. There were no nonradiological releases to the offsite area. Hazardous wastes were shipped to EPA-approved disposal facilities. Compliance with the various regulations stemming from the National Environmental Policy Act is being achieved and, where mandated, permits for air and water discharges and waste management have been obtained from the appropriate agencies. Non-NTS support facilities complied with the requirements of air quality permits and state or local wastewater discharge and hazardous waste permits.

Black, S.C.; Latham, A.R.; Townsend, Y.E. [eds.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

United States Office of Radiation & EPA 402-R-99-002 Environmental Protection Indoor Air (6602J) October 1999  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) October 1999 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive NATURALLY OCCURRING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS #12;#12;TECHNICAL REPORT ON TECHNOLOGICALLY ENHANCED NATURALLY as a compilation of existing data on technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM

370

DOE/EIS-0456 CUSHMAN HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 CUSHMAN HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON (FERC PROJECT NO. 460) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FERC/EIS-0095F, ADOPTED AS DOE/EIS-0456) US Department of Energy OCTOBER 2010 Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Cushman Hydroelectric Project, Mason County, Washington (Adopted) Contact: For additional copies or more information on this final environmental impact statement (EIS), please

371

Staff | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

About » Staff About » Staff Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Staff Program Contacts Organization Chart .pdf file (172KB) BER Budget BER Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » About Staff Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Office of Biological and Environmental Research Dr. Sharlene Weatherwax, Associate Director Climate and Environmental Sciences Division

372

The White House Office of Media Affairs For Planning Purposes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Media Affairs For Planning Purposes December 14, 2010 Environmental Leaders, Cabinet Secretaries to Participate in First White House Environmental Justice Forum WASHINGTON, D.C. - On December 15, Obama Administration officials will convene the first-ever White House Forum on Environmental Justice. Environmental leaders from across the country will attend the day-long forum featuring White House Council on Environmental Quality Chair Nancy Sutley, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, Attorney General Eric Holder, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano. This Forum will focus on the Obama Administration's commitment to ensuring that

373

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability; DOE/EIS-0286: Final Hanford Site Solid Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington (2/13/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

15 15 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2004 / Notices ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 04, 2003 (68 FR 16511). Draft EISs ERP No. D-AFS-J65397-WY Rating LO, Woodrock Project, Proposal for Timber Sale, Travel Management and Watershed Restoration, Implementation, Bighorn National Forest, Tongue Ranger District, Sheridan County, WY. Summary: EPA has lack of objections to the proposed action based on the predicted overall improvement of forest resource conditions. EPA suggests that the final EIS provide qantification sediment from erosion estimates and monitor water quality and habitat quality in streams. ERP No. D-AFS-K65265-AZ Rating LO, Bar T Bar Anderson Springs Allotment Management Plans to

374

Washington Recovery Act State Memo | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Recovery Act State Memo Washington Recovery Act State Memo Washington Recovery Act State Memo Washington State has substantial natural resources, including biomass, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric power. The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA)is making a meaningful down payment on the nation's energy and environmental future. The Recovery Act investments in Washington are supporting a broad range of clean energy projects from energy efficiency and the smart grid to wind, biomass, and geothermal, as well as cleaning up the legacy of Cold War nuclear facilities at Hanford. Through these investments, Washington's businesses, non-profits, and local governments are creating quality jobs today and positioning Washington to play an important role in the new energy economy of the

375

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1011 Plum Street SE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1011 Plum Street SE ď‚ź PO Box 42525 ď‚ź Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 ď‚ź (360) 725-4000 www.commerce.wa.gov July 33, 2013 Roland J. Risser Building Technologies Program Manager Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Mail Stop EE-2J Washington, DC 20585-0121 RE: State Certification of Residential and Commercial Building Energy Codes Dear Mr. Risser: In compliance with Title III of the Energy Conservation and Production Act (ECPA) of 1976, as amended, this is to certify that the State of Washington has adopted the 2012 Edition, Washington State Energy Code, which meets or exceeds the 2012 version of the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for low-rise residential

376

Field Offices | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Field Offices Field Offices About Organization Budget Field Offices Federal Advisory Committees History Scientific and Technical Information Honors & Awards Jobs Brochures, Logos, & Information Resources Contact Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 Field Offices Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Office of Science is accountable for the effective stewardship and management of ten world class laboratories, and employs a performance based management and operating contract model to achieve these objectives. Each Office of Science Site Office oversees the operation of their respective laboratory: Ames Site Office (AMSO) Argonne Site Office (ASO) Berkeley Site Office (BSO)

377

Fermi Site Office Post Office Box 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fermi Site Office Fermi Site Office Post Office Box 2000 Batavia, Illinois 60510 JAN 14 2011 Scott Blake Harris, General Counsel GC-1 FORS SUBJECT: FERMl SITE OFFICE (FSO) 201 1 ANNUAL NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) PLANNING SUIMMARY The Department of Energy (DOE) Order 451 .I B, Change 2, requires Secretarial Officers and Heads of Field Organizations to submit a NEPA Annual Planning Summary to the Office of General Counsel. Per your December 8, 2010 memorandum and guidance provided by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-54), our Annual NEPA Planning Summary is enclosed. We have identified one on-going environmental assessment (EA). No environmental impact statements (EISs) are on-going and two new EAs and one EIS are expected to be prepared beginning in the next 12 to 24 months.

378
379

US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office annual site environmental report: 1993. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Monitoring and surveillance on and around the Nevada Test Site (NTS) by DOE contractors and NTS user organizations during 1993 indicated that operations on the NTS were conducted in compliance with applicable federal and DOE guidelines, i.e., the dose the maximally exposed offsite individual could have received was less than 0.04 percent of the 10 mrem per year guide for air exposure. No nuclear tests were conducted due to the moratorium. All discharges of radioactive liquids remained onsite in containment ponds, and there was no indication of potential migration of radioactivity to the offsite area through groundwater. Surveillance around the NTS indicated that airborne radioactivity from diffusion, evaporation of effluents, or resuspension was not detectable offsite, and no measurable net exposure to members of the offsite population was detected through the offsite dosimetry program. Using the CAP88-PC model and NTS radionuclide emissions data, the calculated effective dose equivalent to the maximally exposed individual offsite would have been 0.004 mrem. Any person receiving this dose would also have received 97 mrem from natural background radiation. There were no nonradiological releases to the offsite area. Hazardous wastes were shipped offsite to approved disposal facilities. Compliance with the various regulations stemming from the National Environmental Policy Act is being achieved and, where mandated, permits for air and water discharges and waste management have been obtained from the appropriate agencies. Support facilities at off-NTS locations compiled with the requirements of air quality permits and state or local wastewater discharge and hazardous waste permits.

Black, S.C.; Glines, W.M.; Townsend, Y.E. [eds.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Environmental Assessment LEAD TEST ASSEMBLY IRRADIATION AND ANALYSIS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 10 Environmental Assessment LEAD TEST ASSEMBLY IRRADIATION AND ANALYSIS WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, TENNESSEE AND HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE COOPERATING AGENCY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY July 1997 ~~~~ Portions o f this dorunrat may be iIlegiile in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original doaxnenL DOE/EA-12 10 Environmental Assessment LEAD TEST ASSEMBLY IRRADIATION AND ANALYSIS WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, TENNESSEE AND HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE COOPERATING AGENCY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY July 1997 U.S. Department of Energy ALARA ANL-W BWR CFR CEDE CEQ Ci CLWR DOE DOT EA EDE EFPD EIS FFTF

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

EIS-0419: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, Washington |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

19: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, 19: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, Washington EIS-0419: Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to allow the electrical interconnection of Whistling Ridge Energy, LLC's proposed 75-megawatt (MW) wind project in Skamania County, Washington, to the Federal Columbia River Transmission System. DOE's Bonneville Power Administration will act as the federal lead agency under NEPA and the Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council will act as the state lead agency under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download August 23, 2011 EIS-0419: Final Environmental Impact Statement

382

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 22, 2011 August 22, 2011 CX-006835: Categorical Exclusion Determination 241-T Tank Farm Debris Barrier Fence CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office August 11, 2011 CX-006490: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bat Roost Tower Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 08/11/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 28, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006092: Categorical Exclusion Determination

383

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 2011 March 1, 2011 CX-005367: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project T-222 Hazardous Materials Management Emergency Response (HAMMER) Training Facility Water Main Extension for Fire Protection CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.15 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office March 1, 2011 CX-005366: Categorical Exclusion Determination Herbicide Applications Along Gravel and Paved Roads on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 31, 2011 CX-005190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project L-691, 200 West Area Sanitary Sewage Lagoon CX(s) Applied: B1.26 Date: 01/31/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

384

DOEEA-0984 Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0984 0984 Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for the Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington May 1995 \ lR4DEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific wmmercial product, process. M m M c e by trade name, uademark, manufacturer. or otherwise, does not necessariiy collbuNte M imply ~ f s endorsement, rewmmendation. or favoring by the Unrted States Government or any agency thereof or I u Contractors M subcontractors Ths repon has been reproduced from the best available copy Available m peper copy and microfiche Available to and contract~s from Office of Scienufic and Technical Information P O Box62 Oak hdge, TN 37831 161 51 576-8401 Available to the public from the U S Department of Commerce

385

Code Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office Department of Energy Washington, DC APRIL 2013 1 Welcome Welcome to The Building Technologies Office's Code Compliance Technical Meeting and to Washington, DC. On behalf of the Department of Energy Building Technology Office (BTO), we would like to thank you for attending, for your participation. The goal of this meeting is to review and discuss ongoing projects and existing activities that improve compliance with model energy codes. DOE

386

Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State November 8, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis EERE SunShot...

387

2015 Washington Auto Show  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz attended the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, DC on January 22, 2015. He delivered brief remarks on the Energy Department's role in electric and fuel cell vehicle technology, announced more than $55 million in funding opportunities to support fuel-efficient vehicle technologies and visited several of the exhibits featuring recent additions to the vehicles market.

388

2015 Washington Auto Show  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz attended the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, DC on January 22, 2015. He delivered brief remarks on the Energy Department's role in electric and fuel cell vehicle technology, and visited several of the exhibits featuring recent additions to the vehicles market.

389

Birthday meeting bemoans low profile of science office  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... It may be 25 years old, but the White House Office of ... of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) has yet to establish a strong identity in Washington. ...

Steve Nadis

2001-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

390

Publications | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Communications and Public Affairs Contacts Research News Publications Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC...

391

2012 Ceremony | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Jobs Brochures, Logos, & Information Resources Contact Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202)...

392

Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA WIND ENERGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM PROJECT ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office MARCH 2011 DOE/EA-1791 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE UNVIERSITY OF MINNESOTA WIND ENERGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM PROJECT ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office MARCH 2011 U.S. Department of Energy University of Minnesota Wind Energy Research Consortium Project Golden Field Office Environmental Assessment March 2011 Page i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1

393

Building organizational technical capabilities: a new approach to address the office of environmental management cleanup challenges in the 21. century  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for the nations nuclear weapons program legacy wastes cleanup. The EM cleanup efforts continue to progress, however the cleanup continues to be technologically complex, heavily regulated, long-term, and a high life cycle cost estimate (LCCE) effort. Over the past few years, the EM program has undergone several changes to accelerate its cleanup efforts with varying degrees of success. Several cleanup projects continued to experience schedule delays and cost growth. The schedule delays and cost growth have been attributed to several factors such as changes in technical scope, regulatory and safety considerations, inadequacy of acquisition approach and project management. This article will briefly review the background and schools of thought on strategic management and organizational change practiced in the United States over the last few decades to improve an organisation's competitive edge and cost performance. The article will briefly review examples such as the change at General Electric, and the recent experience obtained from the nuclear industry, namely the long-term response to the 1986 Chernobyl accident. The long-term response to Chernobyl, though not a case of organizational change, could provide some insight in the strategic management approaches used to address people issues. The article will discuss briefly EM attempts to accelerate cleanup over the past few years, and the subsequent paradigm shift. The paradigm shift targets enhancing and/or creating organizational capabilities to achieve cost savings. To improve its ability to address the 21. century environmental cleanup challenges and achieve cost savings, EM has initiated new corporate changes to develop new and enhance existing capabilities. These new and enhanced organizational capabilities include a renewed emphasis on basics, especially technical capabilities including safety, project management, acquisition management and people. The new enhanced organizational capabilities coupled with more effective communications; oversight and decision-making processes are expected to help EM meet the 21. century challenges. This article will focus on some of the initiatives to develop and enhance organizational technical capabilities. Some of these development initiatives are a part of DOE corporate actions to respond to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) recommendations 93-3 and 2004-1. Other development initiatives have been tailored to meet EM specific needs for organizational capabilities such as case studies analysis and cost estimating. (authors)

Fiore, J.J.; Rizkalla, E.I. [Office of Environmental Management, The United States Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

EA-1679: Preliminary Environmental Assessment | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Preliminary Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Powerplant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington...

395

Energy Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station Install Solar Panels, Improve Efficiency, and Cut Monthly Energy Use Nearly 30% (Fact Sheet), Energy Development in Island Nations, U.S. Virgin Islands (EDIN)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Office Grant Helps the Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station Install Solar Panels, Improve Efficiency, and Cut Monthly Energy Use Nearly 30% Organization Virgin Islands Energy Office www.vienergy.org Industry/Sector Government/Nonprofit Deployment Location St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands This project is such a great learning tool, and I am excited about its progress and being able to show students visiting either VIERS or our website the impact of solar energy. -Randy Brown VIERS Administrator The Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station developed a solar classroom to educate young people in the U.S. Virgin Islands about renewable energy technologies and their energy and environmental impacts. Photo from Don Buchanan, Virgin Islands Energy Office,

396

WASHINGTON SQUARE HALL 118 ONE WASHINGTON SQUARE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Impact Assessment Rachel O'Malley Concentration in Environmental Restoration and Resource Management in Environmental Studies, Minor in Energy Policy and Green Building Alex Gershenson Minor in Sustainable Water: (408) 924-5477 ENVIRONMENTAL-STUDIES@SJSU.EDU WWW.SJSU.EDU/ENVS SJSU DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

Su, Xiao

397

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 of 5 5 of 5 Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 Comment Response Document Volume III - Part B Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (SPD EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283) Locations of Candidate Sites: California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the SPD Final EIS contact: For information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of Fissile Materials Disposition Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health

398

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 of 5 4 of 5 Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 Comment Response Document Volume III - Part A Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (SPD EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283) Locations of Candidate Sites: California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the SPD Final EIS contact: For information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of Fissile Materials Disposition Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health

399

ESPC Sucess Story- Harold Washington Social Security Administration Center  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fact sheet describes the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) success story on environmental stewardship and cost savings at the Harold Washington Social Security Administration Center in Chicago, Illinois.

400

EA-0915: Waste Tank Safety Program Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to resolve waste tank safety issues at the Hanford Site near the City of Richland, Washington, and to reduce the risks associated with...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Closure Hanford, LLC -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC - Washington Closure Hanford, LLC - WEA-2010-02 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Closure Hanford, LLC - WEA-2010-02 August 19, 2010 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington Closure Hanford, LLC related an Employee Fall at the High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the employee fall that occurred at the Hanford High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) on July 1, 2009. The worker sustained serious injury to his back and broke bones in both legs. Based on an evaluation of the evidence in this matter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program, by

402

Preliminary Notice of Violation, URS-Washington Division - WEA-201101 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

URS-Washington Division - URS-Washington Division - WEA-201101 Preliminary Notice of Violation, URS-Washington Division - WEA-201101 October 3, 2011 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to URS-Washington Division related to a Hoisting Incident that occurred at the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Laboratory This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with the October 4, 2010, hoisting incident that occurred when a telescopic hydraulic gantry system (THGS) tipped while lifting a 7,800-pound shield plug at the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP) located at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory. The noncompliances associated with this event were reported

403

Clean Cities: Greater Washington Region Clean Cities coalition  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Washington Region Clean Cities Coalition Washington Region Clean Cities Coalition The Greater Washington Region Clean Cities coalition works with vehicle fleets, fuel providers, community leaders, and other stakeholders to reduce petroleum use in transportation. Greater Washington Region Clean Cities coalition Contact Information Ron Flowers 202-671-1580 ronflowers@gwrccc.org Coalition Website Clean Cities Coordinator Ron Flowers Photo of Ron Flowers Ronald S. "Ron" Flowers, now retired, most recently served as the Director of the Office of Labor-Management Programs (OLMP), under the Executive Office of the Mayor of the District of Columbia (DC) Government. Flowers' senior management experience spans more than 35 years in the public and private sectors, and includes serving as the Fleet Administrator for the DC

404

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (172KB) BER Budget BER Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Directions to Department of Energy, Germantown, Maryland and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research Mailing Address: SC-23/Germantown Building

405

Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Jobs Jobs Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (172KB) BER Budget BER Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Office of Biological and Environmental Research is located in Germantown, Maryland. All open federal positions listed below are posted on

406

Facilities | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Facilities Facilities Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Research Facilities DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) ARM Climate Research Facility Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory Facility Metrics Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » Facilities Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BER User Facilities DOE designs, develops, builds, and operates unique, world-class facilities for the benefit of the entire research community. DOE Office of Science

407

The Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE Arctic) project is supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE Arctic) project is supported by the Office 600 800 1000 1200 1400 m/z 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 8x10 Intensity Degradation products/Organic acids ­ Chemical Characteristics Summary and Implications In order to predict rates of carbon release from tundra

408

News From the D.C. Office: Efficient Office Equipment  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. 3 Aerial view of Washington D.C. News From the D.C. Office Efficient Office Equipment: Update and a Look Ahead An extended version of this article is available here. We are now well aware of the large amount of energy consumed by "plug-in loads" such as personal computers (PCs) and other office electronics. Office equipment is often cited as the fastest-growing end-use of electricity in the fastest-growing sector of demand (commercial buildings). According to Dataquest figures, world growth of PCs will average 14 to 15 percent per year through 1999. Only ten years ago, office equipment was not even part of the "map" of non-residential energy end-uses. There were virtually no data on office equipment energy use, nor an awareness of the

409

Itron (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Itron Itron Address 601 Officers Row Place Vancouver, Washington Zip 98661 Sector Efficiency Product Manufactures/sells advanced meters and data collection systems Website http://www.itron.com/ Coordinates 45.627447°, -122.656794° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.627447,"lon":-122.656794,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

410

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

3 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Oak Ridge Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental...

411

Office of Survey Development and Statistical Integration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Steve Harvey Steve Harvey April 27, 2011 | Washington, D.C. Tough Choices in U.S. EIA's Data Programs Agenda * Office of Oil, Gas, and Coal Supply Statistics * Office of Petroleum and Biofuels Statistics * Office of Electricity, Renewables, and Uranium Statistics * Office of Energy Consumption and Efficiency Statistics * Office of Survey Development and Statistical Integration 2 Presenter name, Presentation location, Presentation date Coal Data Collection Program 3 James Kendell Washington, DC, April 27, 2011 Quarterly Coal Consumption and Quality Report, Manufacturing and Transformation/Processing Coal Plants and Commercial and Institutional Coal Users EIA-3 Quarterly Coal Consumption and Quality Report - Coke Plants EIA-5 Coal Production and Preparation

412

To request disability accommodations contact the University of Washington Disability Services Office at least 10 days in advance of the event: 206-543-6450; 206-685-7264 (fax); 206-543-6452 (TTY); or dso@u.washington. edu (email)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Industrial Research Organisation), Australia Sound advice: acoustical insights into deepwater fisheries in Fisheries 5 January--8 March, 2012 Thursdays at 4:30 pm Reception to follow When? Where? For more Fishery Sciences Auditorium 1122 NE Boat Street University of Washington Funding for the Series

Cooke, Steven J.

413

EIS-0119: Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS presents analyses of potential environmental impacts of decommissioning the eight surplus production reactors at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington.

414

U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/EA-1728-F DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012 APPENDIX F FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ON THE HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON (DOE/EA-1728) AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY An Environmental Assessment (EA) for Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (DOE/EA-1728) has been prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations [CFR], Parts 1500-1508); and DOE's National Environmental Policy Act Implementing

415

EIS-0333: Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

EIS-0333: Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0333: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration, Benton County, Washington This Draft Environmental...

416

EIS-0419: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0419: Final Environmental Impact Statement Whistling Ridge Energy Project, Skamania County, Washington This EIS evaluates the environmental...

417

Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies associated with the Super High-Efficiency Neutron Counter Non-Destructive Assay System Refurbishment at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-CBFO-WIPP-WIPP-2006-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation/causal analysis and discussion with you and other site personnel during an informal conference held on August 1, 2006. Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions -September 8, 2006

418

Department of Energy - Washington  

419

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 of 5 3 of 5 Volume II Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 DOE/EIS-0283 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II United States Department of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition November 1999 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (SPD EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283) Locations of Candidate Sites: California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the SPD Final EIS contact: For information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of Fissile Materials Disposition

420

Energy Matters in Washington State  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energy Matters in Washington State Energy Matters in Washington State www.energy.wsu.edu/library/ November 2009 #12;905 Plum Street SE, Building 3 P.O. Box 43169 Olympia, Washington 98504-3169 Energy University Extension Energy Program. 905 Plum Street SE, Building 3, P.O. Box 43169, Olympia, Washington

Collins, Gary S.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Regulatory and institutional issues impending cleanup at US Department of Energy sites: Perspectives gained from an office of environmental restoration workshop  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy's (DOE) nuclear weapons and energy operations are conducted across a nation-wide industrial complex engaged in a variety of manufacturing, processing, testing, and research and development activities. The overall mission of DOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) is to protect workers, the public, and the environment from waste materials generated by past, current, and future DOE activities and to bring the DOE complex into compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and agreements related to health, safety, and the environment. EM addresses this broad mandate through related and interdependent programs that include corrective actions, waste operations, environmental restoration, and technology development. The EM Office of Environmental Restoration (EM-40) recognizes the importance of implementing a complex-wide process to identify and resolve those issues that may impede progress towards site cleanup. As a first step in this process, FM-40 sponsored an exercise to identify and characterize major regulatory and institutional issues and to formulate integrated action steps towards their resolution. This report is the first product of that exercise. It is intended that the exercise described here will mark the beginning of an ongoing process of issue identification, tracking, and resolution that will benefit cleanup activities across the DOE complex.

Fallon, W E; Gephart, J M; Gephart, R E; Quinn, R D; Stevenson, L A

1991-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Trice, Office of Federal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

309 Federal Register 309 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2013 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Trice, Office of Federal Activities, Mail Code 2252A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564-6646; fax number: (202) 564-0072; email address: trice.jessica@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is 202-566-1744. For additional information about EPA's

423

News From the D.C. Office: Regional Builder Option Packages  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Aerial view of Washington D.C. 8 Aerial view of Washington D.C. News From the D.C. Office Regional Builder Option Packages: A Simplified Guide for Constructing Energy Star® Homes ENERGY STAR Homes is part of a family of voluntary market-transformation programs sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy. The goal of the various Energy Star programs is to help energy users save money and reduce the emission of greenhouse gases by increasing the efficiency of various energy end uses, such as appliances and office equipment. Residential energy use accounts for approximately 20% of the carbon dioxide gas emissions in the U.S., from direct fuel combustion (natural gas, oil, wood) and emissions from electricity generation. The EPA estimates that the average house is responsible for

424

EIS-0288; Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

iii iii COVER SHEET Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy Cooperating Agency: Tennessee Valley Authority Title: Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor Contact: For additional information on this Final Environmental Impact Statement, write or call: Jay Rose Office of Defense Programs U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Attention: CLWR EIS Telephone: (202) 586-5484 For copies of the CLWR Final EIS call: 1-800-332-0801 | For general information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance (EH-42) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

425

DOE/EIS-0476 Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4 Burke County, Georgia Final Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG-1872 and NUREG-1947, Adopted as DOE/EIS-0476 U.S. Department of Energy February 2012 Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Title: Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, Burke County, Georgia (Adopted) DOE/EIS-0476 Contact: For additional copies or more information on this Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), please contact: Mr. Matthew McMillen U.S. Department of Energy Loan Programs Office (LP-10) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Phone: 202-586-7248

426

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Sandia Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the NNSA Sandia Field Office.

427

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Production Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the NNSA Production Office.

428

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Office of Legacy Management..

429

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Legacy Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Office of Legacy Management .

430

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Ames Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Ames Site Office.

431

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Livermore Site Office (LSO)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Livermore Site Office (LSO).

432

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Nevada Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Nevada Field Office.

433

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Argonne Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Argonne Site Office

434

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Carlsbad Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Carlsbad Field Office.

435

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Livermore Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the Livermore Site Office.

436

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Thomas Jefferson Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Thomas Jefferson Site Office.

437

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Princeton Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Princeton Site Office.

438

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Princeton Site Office (PSO)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Princeton Site Office (PSO).

439

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Princeton Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Princeton Site Office.

440

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Princeton Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Princeton Site Office.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Fermi Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Fermi Site Office.

442

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the FERMI Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the FERMI Site Office.

443

The Integrated Environmental Strategies Handbook: A Resource Guide for Air  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

The Integrated Environmental Strategies Handbook: A Resource Guide for Air The Integrated Environmental Strategies Handbook: A Resource Guide for Air Quality Planning Jump to: navigation, search LEDSGP green logo.png FIND MORE DIA TOOLS This tool is part of the Development Impacts Assessment (DIA) Toolkit from the LEDS Global Partnership. Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: The Integrated Environmental Strategies Handbook: A Resource Guide for Air Quality Planning Agency/Company /Organization: United States Environmental Protection Agency Complexity/Ease of Use: Moderate Website: nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P10033EF.PDF Cost: Free References: EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2004. The Integrated Environmental Strategies Handbook. EPA430-B-04-006. Washington, DC. Office of Air and Radiation.[1] Related Tools Integrated Model to Access the Global Environment

444

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007979: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007978: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington

445

Enforcement Letter, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, 2009 Enforcement Letter, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, 2009 May 20, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC, for Electrical Safety Deficiencies at the Idaho National Laboratory In July 2008, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's, Office of Enforcement was made aware of numerous, longstanding electrical safety deficiencies associated with electrical equipment located on the east side of the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC). The Office of Enforcement is also aware that shortly after electrical safety issues with this equipment were identified by a CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC (CWI) worker in May 2007, CWI completed an Engineering Design File

446

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY ORIENTATION HANDBOOK Environmental Health and Safety Office safety & Safety Office 494-2495 (Phone) 494-2996 (Fax) Safety.Office@dal.ca (E-mail) www.dal.ca/safety (Web) Radiation Safety Office 494-1938 (Phone) 494-2996 (Fax) Melissa.Michaud@dal.ca (E-mail) University

Brownstone, Rob

447

DEPARTMENT OF I Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I I Office of ENERGY Science SLAC Site Office SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 2575 Sand Hill Road, MS-8A Menlo Park, CA 94025 DATE: January 11, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR: Joseph A. McBrearty Deputy Director of Field Operations Office of Science FROM: Paul Gola Site a r SLAC Site Office SUBJECT: Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary for 2012, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit the Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary for 2012 for the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), in accordance with the June 1994 Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA and Department of Energy Order 451.1B. The SLAC Site Office (SSO) has reviewed ongoing and planned activities at the site and determined, in consultation with the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer, that there is one NEPA Environmental Assessment

448

Enforcement Letter-CHWM-Washington Group-5/20/09  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 2009 20, 2009 Mr. John Fulton President and Chief Executive Officer CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC 2525 Fremont Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-5104 Dear Mr. Fulton: In July 2008, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's, Office of Enforcement was made aware of numerous, longstanding electrical safety deficiencies associated with electrical equipment located on the east side of the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC). The Office of Enforcement is also aware that shortly after electrical safety issues with this equipment were identified by a CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC (CWI) worker in May 2007, CWI completed an Engineering Design File (EDF-8253, dated August 9, 2007). The Engineering Design File identified widespread

449

DOE/EIS-0372; Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bangor Hydro-Electric Company Northeast Reliability Interconnect (August 2005)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sheet Northeast Reliability Interconnect DEIS Sheet Northeast Reliability Interconnect DEIS iii COVER SHEET Responsible Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) Title: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bangor Hydro-Electric Company Northeast Reliability Interconnect Location: Hancock, Penobscot, and Washington Counties, Maine. Contacts: For additional information on this Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), contact: Dr. Jerry Pell, Project Manager Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy

450

Los Alamos National Laboratory Environmental Management Activities Funded by the Recovery Act, OAS-RA-11-15  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory Environmental Management Activities Funded by the Recovery Act OAS-RA-11-15 August 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 25, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Los Alamos National Laboratory Environmental Management Activities Funded by the Recovery Act" BACKGROUND In February 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted. The Department of Energy's (Department) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) received approximately $212 million in Recovery Act funds from the Office of

451

DOE/EIS-0396 Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (October 2008)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: United States Department of Energy (DOE) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: United States Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (GNEP PEIS; DOE/EIS-0396) CONTACT: For further information on this PEIS, For general information on the DOE National write or call: Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Mr. Francis Schwartz Carol Borgstrom, Director GNEP PEIS Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC-20 Office of Nuclear Energy, NE-5 U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585 (202) 586-4600 (866) 645-7803 or leave a message at 1-800-472-2756 Abstract: The proposed Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Program, which is part of the

452

BERAC Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page MINUTES Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) Meeting Office of Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DATE: December 11-12, 2000 LOCATION: American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register. PARTICIPANTS: A list of attendees showing all BERAC members who were present, guests, and participating Department of Energy officials and staff

453

BERAC Meeting Minutes May 1-2, 2001 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Minutes May 1-2, 2001 Minutes May 1-2, 2001 Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting Minutes May 1-2, 2001 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page MINUTES Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) Meeting Office of Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DATE: May 1-2, 2001 LOCATION: American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register. PARTICIPANTS: A list of BERAC members who were present is attached. Approximately 65 other people were in attendance during the meeting. Tuesday, May 1, 2001

454

BERAC Meeting Minutes November 27-28, 2001 | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Minutes November 27-28, 2001 Minutes November 27-28, 2001 Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting Minutes November 27-28, 2001 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page MINUTES Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) Meeting Office of Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DATE: November 27-28, 2001 LOCATION: American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register. PARTICIPANTS: Approximately 85 people were in attendance during the meeting. Fourteen BERAC members were present: Keith Hodgson S. James Adelstein

455

BERAC Meeting Minutes April 22-23, 1999 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

9 9 Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting Minutes April 22-23, 1999 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page MINUTES Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) Meeting Office of Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DATE: April 22-23, 1999 LOCATION: American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register for April 22-23, 1999 (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770). PARTICIPANTS: A list of attendees showing all BERAC members who were present, guests, and participating Department of Energy officials and staff

456

BERAC Meeting Minutes November 5-6, 1998 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Minutes November 5-6, 1998 Minutes November 5-6, 1998 Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting Minutes November 5-6, 1998 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page MINUTES Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) Meeting Office of Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DATE: November 5-6, 1998 LOCATION: American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register for November 5-6, 1998 (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770). PARTICIPANTS: A list of attendees showing all BERAC members who were present, guests, and participating Department of Energy officials and staff

457

BERAC Meeting Minutes November 30-December 1, 1999 | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

30-December 1, 1999 30-December 1, 1999 Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting Minutes November 30-December 1, 1999 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page MINUTES Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) Meeting Office of Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DATE: November 30 - December 1, 1999 LOCATION: American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register for November 30-December 1, 1999 (on November 10, 1999, Volume 64, Number 217, Page 61321). PARTICIPANTS: A list of attendees showing all BERAC members who were

458

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Pacific Northwest Site Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pacific Northwest Site Office Pacific Northwest Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Pacific Northwest Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Pacific Northwest Site Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 16, 2012 CX-009099: Categorical Exclusion Determination Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.4, B1.8, B1.16, B1.17 Date: 07/16/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Pacific Northwest Site Office June 28, 2012 CX-009097: Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Customs and Border Protection High-Energy Radiography Test Capability CX(s) Applied: B3.10, B3.11 Date: 06/28/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Pacific Northwest Site Office May 18, 2012 CX-009096: Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Customs and Border Protection Non-Intrusive Inspection Tests

459

Washington.indd  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington Washington www.effi cientwindows.org March 2013 1. Meet the Energy Code and Look for the ENERGY STAR ® Windows must comply with your local energy code. Windows that are ENERGY STAR qualifi ed typically meet or exceed energy code requirements. To verify if specific window energy properties comply with the local code requirements, go to Step 2. 2. Look for Effi cient Properties on the NFRC Label The National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) label is needed for verifi cation of energy code compliance (www.nfrc. org). The NFRC label displays whole- window energy properties and appears on all fenestration products which are part of the ENERGY STAR program.

460

The Department of Energy's Use of the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility at the Oak Ridge Reservation, IG-0883  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Use of Use of the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility at the Oak Ridge Reservation DOE/IG-0883 April 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 9, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Use of the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility at the Oak Ridge Reservation" BACKGROUND The Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) is an above-ground waste disposal facility designed to meet the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The Oak Ridge Office of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington 4: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington EIS-0424: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts from DOE's Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to assist with funding the construction, operation, and maintenance of modifications to the Klickitat Hatchery and the Yakama Nation's Hatchery Complex Program that intend to aid populations of anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams. The proposed action could include support for modifications to the existing hatchery, a new hatchery/acclimation facility in Wahkiacus, Washington, and an acclimation facility at McCreedy Creek in Yakima County, Washington. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time.

462

Energy Incentive Programs, Washington | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Washington Energy Incentive Programs, Washington Updated January 2013 Washington utilities budgeted over 180 million in 2011 to promote increased energy efficiency in the state,...

463

Washington/Incentives | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington/Incentives Washington/Incentives < Washington Jump to: navigation, search Contents 1 Financial Incentive Programs for Washington 2 Rules, Regulations and Policies for Washington Download All Financial Incentives and Policies for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 184) Financial Incentive Programs for Washington Download Financial Incentives for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 163) Incentive Incentive Type Active Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Lighting Energy Efficiency Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Energy Efficiency Incentives Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Food Equipment Rebates (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No

464

Audit of the Department of Energy's Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, IG-0371  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 1995 7, 1995 IG-1 INFORMATION: "Audit of the Department of Energy's Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory" The Secretary BACKGROUND: The Office of Energy Research (Energy Research) is in the process of constructing an Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory at Richland, Washington. This laboratory will conduct mostly basic research to help solve the Department's environmental restoration and waste management problems. The total cost of this facility, including equipment, is estimated at $230 million with annual operating costs of about $70 million. Recently, there have been changes in activities of the Department's laboratories caused by the end of the cold war. Defense related research, for example, has decreased dramatically

465

Mr. Carl Schafer Director of Environmental Policy  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

oi Energy oi Energy rk rA$i Washington. DC 20545 .-~~~ ~ MY 2 9 1987 Mr. Carl Schafer Director of Environmental Policy Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20301 Dear Mr. Schafer: As you know, the Department of Energy (DOE) is implementing a program to identify sites that may. be radiologically contaminated as a result of DOE predecessor operations and to correct any problems associated with this contamination if there is DOE authority to do so. Reviews of historical materials from the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and Atomic Energy Cosnnission (AEC) era conducted in support of this program have identified a number of active and former Department of Defense (DOD) installations and DOD contractor sites involved in activities related to the MED/AEC

466

EA-1823: Draft Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Draft Environmental Assessment Draft Environmental Assessment EA-1823: Draft Environmental Assessment Rockford Solar Energy Project, Chicago-Rockford Airport, Winnebago County, Illinois For more information contact: Mr. John Jediny, NEPA Document Manager Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Telephone: 202-287-5380 Fax: 202-340-9260 Electronic mail: John.Jediny@ee.doe.gov Public Hearing: Date: Monday, October 24, 2011; Time: 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Location: Auditorium at the Offices of the Greater Rockford Airport Authority, 60 Airport Drive, Rockford, Illinois, 61109 DOE's proposed action would authorize Federal funding to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity under the State Energy Program.

467

BER Committees of Visitors | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Committees of Committees of Visitors Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (172KB) BER Budget BER Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » About BER Committees of Visitors Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC)

468

Washington County Comprehensive plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Overview of Washington County's Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Steep Slopes 82 Inventory & Assessment - Karst 83 Natural Resources Recommendations What Are the Key Findings from the Research? 13 Land Use 13 Economic Development 13 Housing 13 Natural

469

Environmental Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

682 682 Environmental Assessment Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Conducted Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington Environmental Assessment February 20 10 DOE/EA- 1682 This page intentionally left blank. 1 February 20 10 DOE/EA- 1682 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................1. 1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................... 3 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................... 6 1.3 NEPA REQUIREMENTS............................................................... 6 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVE ....................... 8

470

DOE/EIS-0146 FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACr STATEMENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

146 146 FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACr STATEMENT CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM NOVEMBER 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. 20585 CovERsm LEAD AGENCY U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) COOPERATING AGENCIES None November 1989 Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), Clean Coal Demonstration Program Technology Additional copies or information concerning this final PEIS can be obtained from Allyn Hemenway FE-222, Office of Clean Coal Technology, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585. Telephone: (202) 586-7162. ABsmAcr The proposed action evaluated in this PEIS is to continue the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program (CCTDP) involving the selection, for cost-shared federal funding, of one

471

DOE/EIS-0146 FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACr STATEMENT  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

146 146 FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACr STATEMENT CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM NOVEMBER 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. 20585 CovERsm LEAD AGENCY U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) COOPERATING AGENCIES None November 1989 Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), Clean Coal Demonstration Program Technology Additional copies or information concerning this final PEIS can be obtained from Allyn Hemenway FE-222, Office of Clean Coal Technology, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585. Telephone: (202) 586-7162. ABsmAcr The proposed action evaluated in this PEIS is to continue the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program (CCTDP) involving the selection, for cost-shared federal funding, of one

472

Vehicle Technologies Office: Maximizing Alternative Fuel Vehicle...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Maximizing Alternative Fuel Vehicle Efficiency Vehicle Technologies Office: Maximizing Alternative Fuel Vehicle Efficiency Besides their energy security and environmental benefits,...

473

Cal/EPA's 20 Years of Environmental Excellence Top accomplishments from its five boards, departments and offices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: Adopted the nation's first Low Carbon Fuel Standard to reduce the carbon intensity of fuels by 10% which for enforcement and legal staff, and have awarded millions of dollars in grants for environmental projects

474

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 36th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP 36) that were received on or before January 2, 1992. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are complied with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 36th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP 36) that were received on or before January 2, 1992. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are complied with EML's results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer. This report presents the results from the analysis of the 38th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XXXVIII) that were received on or before June 2, 1993.

Sanderson, C.G.; Klusek, C.S.

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

477

EIS-0194: Proposed Tenaska-Washington II Generation Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This environmental impact statement analyzes the Bonneville Power Administration's proposal to purchase electrical power from a proposed privately-owned combustion-turbine electrical generation plant in Washington. The plant would be fired by natural gas and would use combined-cycle technology to generate 240 average megawatts of energy. The plant would be developed, owned, and operated by Tenaska Washington Partners II, L.P.

478

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review Review Cost Incentives for the Department's Cleanup Contract in Idaho OAS-RA-13-20 May 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 13, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Review of "Cost Incentives for the Department's Cleanup Contract in Idaho" BACKGROUND In Fiscal Year 2005, the Department of Energy (Department) awarded a Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee contract to CH2M ♦ WG Idaho, LLC (CWI) to lead environmental cleanup of its Idaho National Laboratory site. The contract originally ran from May 1, 2005 through September 30, 2012, and

479

Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Drilling Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Drilling April 23, 2013 - 12:06pm Addthis Dr. John Howard (right), Director of NIOSH and Dr. Anthony Cugini (left), Director of NETL announced the establishment of a research partnership to evaluate the environmental impacts of shale gas drilling. Dr. John Howard (right), Director of NIOSH and Dr. Anthony Cugini (left), Director of NETL announced the establishment of a research partnership to evaluate the environmental impacts of shale gas drilling. Washington, DC - A memorandum of understanding to perform collaborative research related to airborne emissions and air quality at natural gas drilling sites has been signed by the Office of Fossil Energy's National

480

Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Drilling Interagency Collaboration to Address Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Drilling April 23, 2013 - 12:06pm Addthis Dr. John Howard (right), Director of NIOSH and Dr. Anthony Cugini (left), Director of NETL announced the establishment of a research partnership to evaluate the environmental impacts of shale gas drilling. Dr. John Howard (right), Director of NIOSH and Dr. Anthony Cugini (left), Director of NETL announced the establishment of a research partnership to evaluate the environmental impacts of shale gas drilling. Washington, DC - A memorandum of understanding to perform collaborative research related to airborne emissions and air quality at natural gas drilling sites has been signed by the Office of Fossil Energy's National

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "washington offices environmental" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Idaho Operations Office (ID)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Idaho Operations Office (ID) (See Environmental Management).

482

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office (SRS)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Savannah River Operations Office (SRS) (See also Environmental Management).