National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for umtra title ii

  1. Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6 Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, ...

  2. Guidance for implementing the long-term surveillance program for UMTRA Project Title I Disposal Sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-02-01

    This guidance document has two purposes: it provides guidance for writing site-specific long-term surveillance plans (LTSP) and it describes site surveillance, monitoring, and long-term care techniques for Title I disposal sites of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) (42 USC Section 7901 et seq.). Long-term care includes monitoring, maintenance, and emergency measures needed to protect public health and safety and the environment after remedial action is completed. This document applies to the UMTRCA-designated Title I disposal sites. The requirements for long-term care of the Title I sites and the contents of the LTSPs are provided in U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations (10 CFR Section 40.27) provided in Attachment 1.

  3. National Ignition Facility Title II Design Plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kumpan, S

    1997-03-01

    This National Ignition Facility (NIF) Title II Design Plan defines the work to be performed by the NIF Project Team between November 1996, when the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reviewed Title I design and authorized the initiation of Title H design and specific long-lead procurements, and September 1998, when Title 11 design will be completed.

  4. Major Design Changes Late in Title II or early in Title III Can...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Design Changes Late in Title II or early in Title III Can Be Costly PMLL Identifier: ... design changes occur late in Title II or early in Title III Discussion: Numerous ...

  5. Title II Disposal Sites Annual Report

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report, in fulfillment of a license requirement, presents the results of long-term surveillance and maintenance activities conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management in 2015 at six uranium mill tailings disposal sites reclaimed under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978. These activities verified that the UMTRCA Title II disposal sites remain in compliance with license requirements.

  6. Guidance for Developing and Implementing Long-Term Surveillance Plans for UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Guidance for Developing and Implementing Long-Term Surveillance Plans for UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites (November 2012)

  7. Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project. [UMTRA project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1989-09-01

    The mission of the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project is explicitly stated and directed in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, hereinafter referred to as the Act.'' Title I of the Act authorizes the Department of Energy (DOE) to undertake remedial action at designated inactive uranium processing sites (Attachment 1 and 2) and associated vicinity properties containing uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials derived from the processing site. The purpose of the remedial actions is to stabilize and control such uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials in a safe and environmentally sound manner to minimize radiation health hazards to the public. The principal health hazards and environmental concerns are: the inhalation of air particulates contaminated as a result of the emanation of radon from the tailings piles and the subsequent decay of radon daughters; and the contamination of surface and groundwaters with radionuclides or other chemically toxic materials. This UMTRA Project Plan identifies the mission and objectives of the project, outlines the technical and managerial approach for achieving them, and summarizes the performance, cost, and schedule baselines which have been established to guide operational activity. Estimated cost increases by 15 percent, or if the schedule slips by six months. 4 refs.

  8. Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-06 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-04 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6.

  9. Solid Waste Operations Complex W-113, Detail Design Report (Title II). Volume 1: Title II design report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    The Solid Waste Retrieval Facility--Phase 1 (Project W113) will provide the infrastructure and the facility required to retrieve from Trench 04, Burial ground 4C, contact handled (CH) drums and boxes at a rate that supports all retrieved TRU waste batching, treatment, storage, and disposal plans. This includes (1) operations related equipment and facilities, viz., a weather enclosure for the trench, retrieval equipment, weighing, venting, obtaining gas samples, overpacking, NDE, NDA, shipment of waste and (2) operations support related facilities, viz., a general office building, a retrieval staff change facility, and infrastructure upgrades such as supply and routing of water, sewer, electrical power, fire protection, roads, and telecommunication. Title I design for the operations related equipment and facilities was performed by Raytheon/BNFL, and that for the operations support related facilities including infrastructure upgrade was performed by KEH. These two scopes were combined into an integrated W113 Title II scope that was performed by Raytheon/BNFL. Volume 1 provides a comprehensive narrative description of the proposed facility and systems, the basis for each of the systems design, and the engineering assessments that were performed to support the technical basis of the Title II design. The intent of the system description presented is to provide WHC an understanding of the facilities and equipment provided and the A/E`s perspective on how these systems will operate.

  10. Review and analysis of proposed EPA groundwater standards for the UMTRA Project. [Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1987-10-01

    The Title I groundwater standards for inactive uranium mill tailings sites, which were promulgated on January 5, 1983, by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project, were remanded to the EPA on September 3, 1985, by the US Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court instructed the EPA to compile general groundwater standards for all sites. On September 24, 1987, the EPA published proposed standards in response to the remand. This Summary Report includes an evaluation of the potential effects of the proposed EPA groundwater standards on the UMTRA Project as well as a discussion of the DOE's position on the proposed standards. This report is accompanied by a detailed Technical Report and Appendices which provide supporting information and analyses. This Summary Report results from a study undertaken to: determine the impact of the proposed standards on the UMTRA Project; and recommend provisions for the implementation of the final standards that will minimize adverse impact to the conduct of the UMTRA Project while ensuring protection of human health and the environment. Specifically, the following were considered: the flexibility of the proposed standards; interpretations of the proposed standards; the extent of aquifer restoration that may be required to implement the proposed standards at each site; the costs of aquifer restoration; and design changes necessary to meet the standards.

  11. Policy Flash 2013-53 Implementation of Division F, Title I, II...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Policy Flash 2013-53 Implementation of Division F, Title I, II, III AL 2013-06 and FAL 2013-04 Questions concerning conference spending, should be directed to Jason Taylor at ...

  12. UMTRA Project document control system manual

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    This manual defines the Project Document Control System (PDCS) operated by the US DOE Uranium Mill tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) project Office. The purpose of the PDCS is to provide an active and continuing program for acquiring, controlling, retaining, retrieving, retiring and disposing of all UMTRA Project documents. The PDCS also provides guidance and coordination in transferring documents by various UMTRA Projection document control centers to a central location.

  13. Engineering scale mixing system tests for MWTF title II design

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chang, S.C.

    1994-10-10

    Mixing tests for the Multifunction Waste Tank Facility (MWTF) were conducted in 1/25 and 1/10 scale test tanks with different slurry levels, solids concentrations, different jet mixers and with simulated in-tank structures. The same test procedure was used as in the Title I program, documented in WHC-SD-W236A-ER-005. The test results support the scaling correlation derived previously in the Title I program. The tests also concluded that a partially filled tank requires less mixing power, and horizontal and angled jets in combination (H/A mixer) are significantly more effective than the two horizontal jet mixers (H/H mixer) when used for mixing slurry with a high solids concentrations.

  14. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    WE/OR/20722-275 102-HSP-01 Rev. 1 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR THE ALBANY RESEARCH CENTER SITE SEFTEMBER 1990 Prepared for United S t a t e s Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract N o . DE-AC05-810R20722 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job N o . 14501 TITLE : HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR THE U Y RESEARCH CENTER SITE DDCUMENT NUMBER: 102-HSP-01 REVISION NUMBER: 1 PROJECT: PUSPAP JOB NO. : 1 4 5 0 1 REVIEW: ~a fetf Services REVIEWED: REVIEWED : APPROVED:

  15. Title:

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Title: 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory (DOE/EIS 0380) Mitigation Action Plan U.S. Department of Energy Date: December 2008 Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. By acceptance of this article, the publisher

  16. UMTRA Ground Water Project management action process document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-03-01

    A critical U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) mission is to plan, implement, and complete DOE Environmental Restoration (ER) programs at facilities that were operated by or in support of the former Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). These facilities include the 24 inactive processing sites the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) (42 USC Section 7901 et seq.) identified as Title I sites, which had operated from the late 1940s through the 1970s. In UMTRCA, Congress acknowledged the potentially harmful health effects associated with uranium mill tailings and directed the DOE to stabilize, dispose of, and control the tailings in a safe and environmentally sound manner. The UMTRA Surface Project deals with buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the processing sites and any associated vicinity properties (VP). Surface remediation at the processing sites will be completed in 1997 when the Naturita, Colorado, site is scheduled to be finished. The UMTRA Ground Water Project was authorized in an amendment to the UMTRCA (42 USC Section 7922(a)), when Congress directed DOE to comply with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ground water standards. The UMTRA Ground Water Project addresses any contamination derived from the milling operation that is determined to be present at levels above the EPA standards.

  17. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    OFF C . 1 Ili II11IlIIllllllllllllllI1111I~I B M - 171- 147 ~ ~ ~ 0 3 3 1 0 8 Biology and M e d i c i n e AMCHITKA BIOENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM BIOENVIRONMENTAL S A F E T Y STUDIES, AMC HITKA ISLAND, ALASKA CANNIKIN D t 2 MONTHS REPORT Compiled by James B . K i r k w o o d and R. G l e n Fuller J u n e , 1972 P r e p a r e d for the U . S. A t o m i c E n e r g y C o m m i s s i o n under C o n t r a c t N o . AT(2b- 1 ) - 17 1 - - BATTELLE Columbus Labor a t o r ies 5 05 King Avenue C o l u m b u s

  18. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    1 111II1111111111111111111111111 GSB WW06 Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1993 y :<I 2:. r k :'I : J *' r 1 ! J Environmental Restoration 1 A:, p. J : J Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1993 Environmental Restoration U-~i~epartrnent of Energy Nevada Operations Office Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico

  19. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    M A U h G E D 0 1 M M l N Y A R I E I ENERGY SYSTEMS. IYC. FOR THE U.S. O E P A R I M E I I T OF ENEnOY June 14, 1994 POST OFFICE BOX 2006 OAK RIDGE. TENNESSEE 37831 Dr. W. A. Williams EM-421 Trevion II Building Department of Energy Washington, D. C. 20585 Dear Dr. Williams: T r i p Report: Radiological Survey of Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company Site, Fairfield, Ohio (FOHOOl), M a y 31 and June 1,1994 On May 31 and June I, a radiological survey was conducted in the area

  20. Review and analysis of proposed EPA groundwater standards for the UMTRA Project. Summary report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1987-10-01

    The Title I groundwater standards for inactive uranium mill tailings sites, which were promulgated on January 5, 1983, by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project, were remanded to the EPA on September 3, 1985, by the US Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court instructed the EPA to compile general groundwater standards for all sites. On September 24, 1987, the EPA published proposed standards in response to the remand. This Summary Report includes an evaluation of the potential effects of the proposed EPA groundwater standards on the UMTRA Project as well as a discussion of the DOE`s position on the proposed standards. This report is accompanied by a detailed Technical Report and Appendices which provide supporting information and analyses. This Summary Report results from a study undertaken to: determine the impact of the proposed standards on the UMTRA Project; and recommend provisions for the implementation of the final standards that will minimize adverse impact to the conduct of the UMTRA Project while ensuring protection of human health and the environment. Specifically, the following were considered: the flexibility of the proposed standards; interpretations of the proposed standards; the extent of aquifer restoration that may be required to implement the proposed standards at each site; the costs of aquifer restoration; and design changes necessary to meet the standards.

  1. Computer code input for thermal hydraulic analysis of Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility Title II design

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cramer, E.R.

    1994-10-01

    The input files to the P/Thermal computer code are documented for the thermal hydraulic analysis of the Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility Title II design analysis.

  2. Solid Waste Operations Complex W-113, Detail Design Report (Title II). Volume 3: Specifications

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    The Solid Waste Retrieval Facility--Phase 1 (Project W113) will provide the infrastructure and the facility required to retrieve from Trench 04, Burial ground 4C, contact handled (CH) drums and boxes at a rate that supports all retrieved TRU waste batching, treatment, storage, and disposal plans. This includes (1) operations related equipment and facilities, viz., a weather enclosure for the trench, retrieval equipment, weighing, venting, obtaining gas samples, overpacking, NDE, NDA, shipment of waste and (2) operations support related facilities, viz., a general office building, a retrieval staff change facility, and infrastructure upgrades such as supply and routing of water, sewer, electrical power, fire protection, roads, and telecommunication. Title I design for the operations related equipment and facilities was performed by Raytheon/BNFL, and that for the operations support related facilities including infrastructure upgrade was performed by KEH. These two scopes were combined into an integrated W113 Title II scope that was performed by Raytheon/BNFL. Volume 3 is a compilation of the construction specifications that will constitute the Title II materials and performance specifications. This volume contains CSI specifications for non-equipment related construction material type items, performance type items, and facility mechanical equipment items. Data sheets are provided, as necessary, which specify the equipment overall design parameters.

  3. UMTRA project list of reportable occurrences

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-04-01

    This UMTRA Project List of Reportable occurrences is provided to facilitate efficient categorization of reportable occurrences. These guidelines have been established in compliance with DOE minimum reporting requirements under DOE Order 5000.3B. Occurrences are arranged into nine groups relating to US Department of Energy (DOE) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project operations for active sites. These nine groupings are provided for reference to determined whether an occurrence meets reporting requirement criteria in accordance with the minimum reporting requirements. Event groups and significance categories that cannot or will not occur, and that do not apply to UMTRA Project operations, are omitted. Occurrence categorization shall be as follows: Group 1. Facility Condition; Group 2. Environmental; Group 3. Personnel Safety; Group 4. Personnel Radiation Protection; Group 5. Safeguards and Security; Group 6. Transportation; Group 7. Value Basis Reporting; Group 8. Facility Status; and Group 9. Cross-Category Items.

  4. Solid Waste Operations Complex W-113, Detail Design Report (Title II). Volume 4: Project cost estimate

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    The Solid Waste Retrieval Facility--Phase 1 (Project W113) will provide the infrastructure and the facility required to retrieve from Trench 04, Burial ground 4C, contact handled (CH) drums and boxes at a rate that supports all retrieved TRU waste batching, treatment, storage, and disposal plans. This includes (1) operations related equipment and facilities, viz., a weather enclosure for the trench, retrieval equipment, weighing, venting, obtaining gas samples, overpacking, NDE, NDA, shipment of waste and (2) operations support related facilities, viz., a general office building, a retrieval staff change facility, and infrastructure upgrades such as supply and routing of water, sewer, electrical power, fire protection, roads, and telecommunication. Title I design for the operations related equipment and facilities was performed by Raytheon/BNFL, and that for the operations support related facilities including infrastructure upgrade was performed by KEH. These two scopes were combined into an integrated W113 Title II scope that was performed by Raytheon/BNFL. This volume represents the total estimated costs for the W113 facility. Operating Contractor Management costs have been incorporated as received from WHC. The W113 Facility TEC is $19.7 million. This includes an overall project contingency of 14.4% and escalation of 17.4%. A January 2001 construction contract procurement start date is assumed.

  5. UMTRA Surface Project management action process document. Final report: Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-04-01

    A critical mission of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is the planning, implementation, and completion of environmental restoration (ER) programs at facilities that were operated by or in support of the former Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from the late 1940s into the 1970s. Among these facilities are the 24 former uranium mill sites designed in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978 (42 USC {section} 7901 et seq.) Title 1 of the UMTRCA authorized the DOE to undertake remedial actions at these designated sites and associated vicinity properties (VP), which contain uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials (RRM) derived from the processing sites. Title 2 of the UMTRCA addresses uranium mill sites that were licensed at the time the UMTRCA was enacted. Cleanup of these Title 2 sites is the responsibility of the licensees. The cleanup of the Title 1 sites has been split into two separate projects: the Surface Project, which deals with the mill buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the sites and VPs; and the Ground Water Project, which is limited to the contaminated ground water at the sites. This management action process (MAP) document discusses the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Surface Project only; a separate MAP document has been prepared for the UMTRA Ground Water Project.

  6. UMTRA Surface Project management action process document: Final. Revision 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-06-01

    Title 1 of the UMTRCA authorized the DOE to undertake remedial actions at these designed sites and associated vicinity properties (VP), which contain uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials (RRM) derived from the processing sites. Title 2 of the UMTRCA addresses uranium mill sites that were licensed at the time the UMTRCA was enacted. Cleanup of these Title 2 sites is the responsibility of the licensees. The cleanup of the Title 1 sites has been split into two separate projects: the Surface Project, which deals with the mill buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the sites and VPs; and the Ground Water Project, which is limited to the contaminated ground water at the sites. This management action process (MAP) document discusses the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Surface Project. Since its inception through March 1996, the Surface Project (hereinafter called the Project) has cleaned up 16 of the 24 designated processing sites and approximately 5,000 VPs, reducing the risk to human health and the environment posed by the uranium mill tailings. Two of the 24 sites, Belfield and Bowman, North Dakota, will not be remediated at the request of the state, reducing the total number of sites to 22. By the start of FY1998, the remaining 6 processing sites and associated VPs will be cleaned up. The remedial action activities to be funded in FY1998 by the FY1998 budget request are remediation of the remaining Grand Junction, Colorado, VPs; closure of the Cheney disposal cell in Grand Junction, Colorado; and preparation of the completion reports for 4 completed sites.

  7. --No Title--

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Guard Corps, as contained in Titles II and III of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012. The effective date was December 10, 2012. This Flash will be...

  8. 2013 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2013-11-01

    This report, in fulfillment of a license requirement, presents the results of long-term surveillance and maintenance activities conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management in 2013 at six uranium mill tailings disposal sites reclaimed under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978. These activities verified that the UMTRCA Title II disposal sites remain in compliance with license requirements. DOE manages six UMTRCA Title II disposal sites under a general license granted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) established at Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 40.28. Reclamation and site transition activities continue at other sites, and DOE ultimately expects to manage approximately 27 Title II disposal sites. Long-term surveillance and maintenance activities and services for these disposal sites include inspecting and maintaining the sites; monitoring environmental media and institutional controls; conducting any necessary corrective action; and performing administrative, records, stakeholder services, and other regulatory functions. Annual site inspections and monitoring are conducted in accordance with site-specific long-term surveillance plans (LTSPs) and procedures established by DOE to comply with license requirements. Each site inspection is performed to verify the integrity of visible features at the site; to identify changes or new conditions that may affect the long-term performance of the site; and to determine the need, if any, for maintenance, follow-up inspections, or corrective action. LTSPs and site compliance reports are available online at http://www.lm.doe.gov

  9. Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility thermal hydraulic analysis for Title II design

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cramer, E.R.

    1994-11-10

    The purpose of this work was to provide the thermal hydraulic analysis for the Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility (MWTF) Title II design. Temperature distributions throughout the tank structure were calculated for subsequent use in the structural analysis and in the safety evaluation. Calculated temperatures of critical areas were compared to design allowables. Expected operating parameters were calculated for use in the ventilation system design and in the environmental impact documentation. The design requirements were obtained from the MWTF Functional Design Criteria (FDC). The most restrictive temperature limit given in the FDC is the 200 limit for the haunch and dome steel and concrete. The temperature limit for the rest of the primary and secondary tanks and concrete base mat and supporting pad is 250 F. Also, the waste should not be allowed to boil. The tank geometry was taken from ICF Kaiser Engineers Hanford drawing ES-W236A-Z1, Revision 1, included here in Appendix B. Heat removal rates by evaporation from the waste surface were obtained from experimental data. It is concluded that the MWTF tank cooling system will meet the design temperature limits for the design heat load of 700,000 Btu/h, even if cooling flow is lost to the annulus region, and temperatures change very slowly during transients due to the high heat capacity of the tank structure and the waste. Accordingly, transients will not be a significant operational problem from the viewpoint of meeting the specified temperature limits.

  10. ERD UMTRA Project quality assurance program plan, Revision 7

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    This document is the revised Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) dated September, 1995 for the Environmental Restoration Division (ERD) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project (UMTRA). Quality Assurance requirements for the ERD UMTRA Project are based on the criteria outlined in DOE Order 5700.6C or applicable sections of 10 CFR 830.120. QA requirements contained in this QAPP shall apply to all personnel, processes, and activities, including planning, scheduling, and cost control, performed by the ERD UMTRA Project and its contractors.

  11. UMTRA Project Office quality assurance program plan. Revision 6

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    The Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project was established to accomplish remedial actions at inactive uranium mill tailings sites. The UMTRA Project`s mission is to stabilize and control the residual radioactive materials at designated sites in a safe and environmentally sound manner so as to minimize or eliminate radiation health hazards to the public. Because these efforts may involve possible risks to public health and safety, a quality assurance (QA) program that conforms to the applicable criteria has been established to control the quality of the work. This document, the Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP), brings into one document the essential criteria to be applied on a selective basis, depending upon the nature of the activity being conducted, and describes how those criteria shall be applied to the UMTRA Project. QA requirements contained in this QAPP shall apply to all personnel, processes, and activities, including planning, scheduling, and cost control, performed by the UMTRA Project Office and its contractors.

  12. UMTRA Project Office Quality Assurance Program Plan. Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-11-01

    The Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project was established to accomplish remedial actions at inactive uranium mill tailings sites in accordance with Public Law 95-604, the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (UMTRCA). The UMTRA Project`s mission is to stabilize and control the residual radioactive materials at designated sites in a safe and environmentally sound manner so as to minimize or eliminate radiation health hazards to the public. The US Department of Energy (DOE) UMTRA Project Office directs the overall Project. Because these efforts may involve possible risks to public health and safety, a quality assurance (QA) program that conforms to the applicable criteria (set forth in the reference documents) has been established to control the quality of the work. This document, the Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP), brings into one document the essential criteria to be applied on a selective basis, depending upon the nature of the activity being conducted, and describes how those criteria shall be applied to the UMTRA Project. The UMTRA Project Office shall require each Project contractor to prepare and submit for approval a more detailed QAPP that is based on the applicable criteria of this QAPP and the referenced documents. All QAPPs on the UMTRA Project shall fit within the framework of this plan or an industry standard format that has been approved by the DOE Project Office.

  13. UMTRA project technical assistance contractor quality assurance implementation plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-03-01

    The Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Technical Assistance contractor (TAC) Quality Assurance Implementation Plan (QAIP) outlines the primary requirements for integrating quality functions for TAC technical activities applied to the surface and ground water phases of the UMTRA Project. The QAIP is subordinate to the latest issue of the UMTRA Project TAC Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) (DOE, 1993a), which was developed using US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5700.6C quality assurance (QA) criteria. The QAIP addresses technical aspects of the TAC UMTRA Project surface and ground water programs. All QA issues in the QAIP shall comply with requirements contained in the TAC QAPP (DOE, 1933a). Because industry standards for data acquisition and data control are not addressed in DOE Order 5700.6C, the QAIP has been formatted to the 14 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) QA requirements. DOE Order 5700.6C criteria that are not contained in the CERCLA requirements are added to the QAIP as additional requirements in Sections 15.0 through 18.0. Project documents that contain CERCLA requirements and 5700.6 criteria shall be referenced in this document to avoid duplication. Referenced documents are not included in this QAIP but are available through the UMTRA Project Document Control Center.

  14. Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Gunnison, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    N /A

    2002-08-13

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is in the process of selecting a ground water compliance strategy for the Gunnison, Colorado, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site. This Environmental Assessment (EA) discusses two alternatives and the effects associated with each. The two alternatives are (1) natural flushing coupled with institutional controls and continued monitoring and (2) no action. The compliance strategy must meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ground water standards defined in Title 40 ''Code of Federal Regulations'' Part 192, Subpart B, in areas where ground water beneath and around the site is contaminated as a result of past milling operations. It has been determined that contamination in the ground water at the Gunnison site consists of soluble residual radioactive material (RRM) as defined in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA).

  15. UMTRA project water sampling and analysis plan, Tuba City, Arizona

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-02-01

    Planned, routine ground water sampling activities at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site in Tuba City, Arizona, are described in the following sections of this water sampling and analysis plan (WSAP). This plan identifies and justifies the sampling locations, analytical parameters, detection limits, and sampling frequency for the stations routinely monitored at the site. The ground water data are used for site characterization and risk assessment. The regulatory basis for routine ground water monitoring at UMTRA Project sites is derived from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations in 40 CFR Part 192 (1994) and the final EPA standards of 1995 (60 FR 2854). Sampling procedures are guided by the UMTRA Project standard operating procedures (SOP) (JEG, n.d.), and the most effective technical approach for the site.

  16. Coordinated NO{sub x} control strategies: Phase II Title IV, ozone transport region and ozone transport assessment group

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Frazier, W.F.; Dunn, R.M.; Baublis, D.C.

    1998-12-31

    Many electric utilities are faced with future nitrogen oxides (NO{sub x}) reduction requirements. In some instances, these utilities will be affected by multiple regulatory programs. For example, numerous fossil fired plants must comply with Phase II of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), state NO{sub x} rules as a result of the recommendations of the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) and future requirements of the Proposed Rule for Reducing Regional Transport of Ground-Level Ozone (Ozone Transport SIP Rulemaking). This paper provides an overview of NO{sub x} regulatory programs, NO{sub x} compliance planning concepts, and NO{sub x} control technology options that could be components of an optimized compliance strategy.

  17. UMTRA water sampling and analysis plan, Green River, Utah

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Papusch, R.

    1993-12-01

    The purpose of this water sampling and analysis plan (WSAP) is to provide a basis for groundwater and surface water sampling at the Green River Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site. This WSAP identifies and justifies the sampling locations, analytical parameters, detection limits, and sampling frequency for the monitoring locations.

  18. Clean Air Act Title IV: Lessons learned from Phase I; getting ready for Phase II

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Miller, M.J.

    1997-12-31

    The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have required significant reductions in SO{sub 2} and NO{sub x} emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants in the US. This paper examines some of the key technical lessons learned in Phase I following retrofit of low NO{sub x} systems, FGD systems, and continuous emissions monitors. Some of the key problems encountered have been waterwall wastage as a result of low NO{sub x} burner retrofits; high LOI (carbon) ash as a result of low NO{sub x} operation; high O&M costs associated with CEMs; and the heat rate discrepancy which has arisen between CEMs and conventional heat rate calculations. As Phase II approaches, EPRI and the electric utility industry are investigating improvements in FGD systems (e.g., clear liquor scrubbing), advances in NO{sub x} control technologies, more robust CEM systems, and tools to help in the technology decision-making process.

  19. UMTRA project technical assistance contractor quality assurance implementation plan for surface and ground water, Revision 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-11-01

    This document contains the Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) Quality Assurance Implementation Plan (QAIP) for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project. The QAIP outlines the primary requirements for integrating quality functions for TAC technical activities applied to the surface and ground water phases of the UMTRA Project. The QA program is designed to use monitoring, audit, and surveillance activities as management tools to ensure that UMTRA Project activities are carried out in amanner to protect public health and safety, promote the success of the UMTRA Project, and meet or exceed contract requirements.

  20. UMTRA project disposal cell cover biointrusion sensitivity assessment, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-10-01

    This study provides an analysis of potential changes that may take place in a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project disposal cell cover system as a result of plant biointrusion. Potential changes are evaluated by performing a sensitivity analysis of the relative impact of root penetrations on radon flux out of the cell cover and/or water infiltration into the cell cover. Data used in this analysis consist of existing information on vegetation growth on selected cell cover systems and information available from published studies and/or other available project research. Consistent with the scope of this paper, no new site-specific data were collected from UMTRA Project sites. Further, this paper does not focus on the issue of plant transport of radon gas or other contaminants out of the disposal cell cover though it is acknowledged that such transport has the potential to be a significant pathway for contaminants to reach the environment during portions of the design life of a disposal cell where plant growth occurs. Rather, this study was performed to evaluate the effects of physical penetration and soil drying caused by plant roots that have and are expected to continue to grow in UMTRA Project disposal cell covers. An understanding of the biological and related physical processes that take place within the cover systems of the UMTRA Project disposal cells helps the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) determine if the presence of a plant community on these cells is detrimental, beneficial, or of mixed value in terms of the cover system`s designed function. Results of this investigation provide information relevant to the formulation of a vegetation control policy.

  1. UMTRA project water sampling and analysis plan, Monument Valley, Arizona

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-04-01

    The Monument Valley Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site in Cane Valley is a former uranium mill that has undergone surface remediation in the form of tailings and contaminated materials removal. Contaminated materials from the Monument Valley (Arizona) UMTRA Project site have been transported to the Mexican Hat (Utah) UMTRA Project site for consolidation with the Mexican Hat tailings. Tailings removal was completed in February 1994. Three geologic units at the site contain water: the unconsolidated eolian and alluvial deposits (alluvial aquifer), the Shinarump Conglomerate (Shinarump Member), and the De Chelly Sandstone. Water quality analyses indicate the contaminant plume has migrated north of the site and is mainly in the alluvial aquifer. An upward hydraulic gradient in the De Chelly Sandstone provides some protection to that aquifer. This water sampling and analysis plan recommends sampling domestic wells, monitor wells, and surface water in April and September 1994. The purpose of sampling is to continue periodic monitoring for the surface program, evaluate changes to water quality for site characterization, and provide data for the baseline risk assessment. Samples taken in April will be representative of high ground water levels and samples taken in September will be representative of low ground water levels. Filtered and nonfiltered samples will be analyzed for plume indicator parameters and baseline risk assessment parameters.

  2. UMTRCA Title II Audit

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Inspector General (IG) performed an audit during the period of June 2013 through October 2014 to determine if the DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM)...

  3. UMTRA project technical assistance contractor quality assurance implementation plan for surface and ground water

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    The Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) Quality Assurance Implementation Plan (QAIP) outlines the primary requirements for integrating quality functions for TAC technical activities applied to the surface and ground water phases of the UMTRA Project. The QAIP is subordinate to the latest issue of the UMTRA Project TAC Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP). The QAIP addresses technical aspects of the TAC UMTRA Project surface and ground water programs. The QAIP is authorized and approved by the TAC Project Manager and QA manager. The QA program is designed to use monitoring, audit, and surveillance functions as management tools to ensure that all Project organization activities are carried out in a manner that will protect public health and safety, promote the success of the UMTRA Project and meet or exceed contract requirements.

  4. Management and overview Quality Assurance Program Plan. [Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1986-08-01

    The Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Office (DOE/ UMTRA-PO) is the US Department of Energy (DOE) Albuquerque Operations Office (AL) organization charged with the responsibility of managing and coordinating the activities of the various participating organizations and support contractors working on the UMTRA Project. This Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) describes how the DOE/UMTRA-PO, as assisted by the Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC), performs the quality assurance (QA) aspects of managing and coordinating UMTRA Project activities. This QAPP was developed to comply with DOE Order 5700.6A, August, 1981, and AL Order 5700.6B, April, 1984, which contain the criteria applicable to Project QA activities.

  5. Solid Waste Operations Complex W-113, Detail Design Report (Title II). Volume 2: Solid waste retrieval facilities -- Phase 1, detail design drawings

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    The Solid Waste Retrieval Facility--Phase 1 (Project W113) will provide the infrastructure and the facility required to retrieve from Trench 04, Burial ground 4C, contact handled (CH) drums and boxes at a rate that supports all retrieved TRU waste batching, treatment, storage, and disposal plans. This includes (1) operations related equipment and facilities, viz., a weather enclosure for the trench, retrieval equipment, weighing, venting, obtaining gas samples, overpacking, NDE, NDA, shipment of waste and (2) operations support related facilities, viz., a general office building, a retrieval staff change facility, and infrastructure upgrades such as supply and routing of water, sewer, electrical power, fire protection, roads, and telecommunication. Title I design for the operations related equipment and facilities was performed by Raytheon/BNFL, and that for the operations support related facilities including infrastructure upgrade was performed by KEH. These two scopes were combined into an integrated W113 Title II scope that was performed by Raytheon/BNFL. Volume 2 provides the complete set of the Detail Design drawings along with a listing of the drawings. Once approved by WHC, these drawings will be issued and baselined for the Title 3 construction effort.

  6. Title XVII

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Title XVII of EPAct05 provides the basis of the Energy Department’s program. This title provides broad authority for the Department to guarantee loans that support early commercial use of advanced...

  7. Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Durango, Colorado,UMTRA Project Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    for the U.S. Department of Energy Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Durango, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site February 2008 This page intentionally left blank U0165200 Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Durango, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site February 2008 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-02GJ79491 This page intentionally left

  8. Title | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    40.3 KB) More Documents & Publications Title Title Title

  9. Elmo Bumpy Torus proof of principle, Phase II: Title 1 report. Volume V. Vacuum-pumping system. Preliminary design report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1982-02-26

    This report summarizes Title I Preliminary Design of the EBT-P Vacuum Pumping System. The Vacuum Pumping System has been designed by the McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. - St. Louis (MDAC). It includes the necessary vacuum pumps and vacuum valves to evacuate the torus, the Mirror Coil Dewars (MC Dewars), and the Gyrotron Magnet Dewars. The pumping ducts, manifolds, and microwave protection system are also included. A summary of the function of each subsystem and a description of its principle components is provided below. The analyses performed during the system design are also identified.

  10. UMTRA project water sampling and analysis plan, Naturita, Colorado. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    Planned, routine ground water sampling activities for calendar year 1995 to 1997 at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site near Naturita, Colorado, are described in this water sampling and analysis plan. The following plan identifies and justifies the sampling locations, analytical parameters, detection limits, sampling frequency, and specific rationale for each routine monitoring station at the site. The regulatory basis for routine ground water monitoring at UMTRA Project sites is derived from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations in 40 CFR Part 192. Sampling procedures are guided by the UMTRA Project standard operating procedures (SOP) (JEG, n.d.), the Technical Approach Document (TAD) (DOE, 1989), and the most effective technical approach for the site.

  11. CLEANING UP MILL TAILINGS AND GROUND WATER AT THE MOAB UMTRA PROJECT SITE |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy CLEANING UP MILL TAILINGS AND GROUND WATER AT THE MOAB UMTRA PROJECT SITE CLEANING UP MILL TAILINGS AND GROUND WATER AT THE MOAB UMTRA PROJECT SITE August 2, 2010 - 12:00pm Addthis A sheep’s foot roller compacts the tailings in the disposal cell. A sheep's foot roller compacts the tailings in the disposal cell. Moab, UT MILL TAILINGS REMOVAL Sixteen million tons of uranium mill tailings 80 feet high stood on the banks of the Colorado River near Moab in southeast

  12. Task Order Awarded for Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Follow-On Effort | Department of Energy for Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Follow-On Effort Task Order Awarded for Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Follow-On Effort April 20, 2016 - 11:30am Addthis Media Contact: Lynette Chafin 513-246-0461 Lynette.Chafin@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati - The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award of a Fixed Unit Rate and Cost Reimbursement Task Order issued under the Office of Environmental Management Nationwide

  13. --No Title--

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    reciprocity of tax-exempt status to other states. The only provision which will establish tax-exempt status under California ruling is that title of property purchased for use in...

  14. Title page

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... A follow-up title search is currently being conducted to ... Finally, DOE expects to enter into an agreement with the ... easement, and the terms of the easement could ...

  15. UMTRA Project Site Observational Work Plan, Mexican Hat, Utah

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    Surface cleanup activities at the Mexican Hat UMTRA processing site are nearing completion. Ground Water contamination at the Mexican Hat site is a result of uranium milling operations. The extent of residual process water has been identified, and it is limited to the uppermost aquifer in the vicinity of the site. Deeper aquifers are not affected because of an upward hydraulic gradient and the presence of a confining unit (the deeper aquifers are protected by hydrogeologic isolation). The uppermost unit is returning to its pre-milling, mainly unsaturated state. The unit that contains the contaminated water is not a ground water resource because it qualifies as Class III (limited use) based on limited yield. Ground water in the uppermost unit is currently not used and is not anticipated to be used as a ground water resource. The nearby San Juan River and a converted oil exploration well provide all of the water needs for the area. There are no current threats to human health or livestock; and, because the zone of contamination does not represent a ground water resource, none are anticipated in the future. There are, however, seeps where contaminated water is exposed at land surface. The seeps create potential exposure pathways for plants and wildlife. It is not known at this time if there is a risk to the environment. Additional investigations are needed and are described in this document to confirm the presence or absence of potential environmental risks. Additional hydrogeologic investigations are not required. The proposed ground water compliance strategy for the site is no remediation, because the ground water in the uppermost aquifer (which is also the zone of contamination) qualifies for supplemental standards based on Class III, limited yield, and because there are no threats to human health. Domestic and agricultural water is pumped from a deeper aquifer that is isolated from the contaminated zone.

  16. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    || | ct II | PAD | | | | | | Year |(Conti-|Distri-| | | | | | Month | nued) | ct III| | | | | | ||Average|Average| ID...

  17. TITLE XVII APPLICATION PORTAL

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Title XVII online application portal guides users through the Title XVII loan guarantee application process.

  18. Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Durango, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    N /A

    2002-11-29

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing a ground water compliance strategy for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site near Durango, Colorado. DOE has prepared this environmental assessment to provide the public with information concerning the potential effects of this proposed strategy.

  19. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA Project Site at Grand Junction, Colorado

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-03-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this initial site observational work plan (SOWP) for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site in Grand Junction, Colorado. This SOWP is one of the first UMTRA Ground Water Project documents developed to select a compliance strategy that meets the UMTRA ground water standards (40 CFR Part 192, as amended by 60 FR 2854) for the Grand Junction site. This SOWP applies information about the Grand Junction site to the compliance strategy selection framework developed in the UMTRA Ground Water Project draft programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS). This risk-based, decision-making framework identifies the decision logic for selecting compliance strategies that could be used to meet the ground water standards. The DOE goal is to use the observational method to implement a cost-effective site strategy that complies with the ground water standards and protects human health and the environment. Based on an evaluation of the site characterization and risk assessment data available for the preparation of this SOWP, DOE proposes that the most likely compliance strategy for the Grand Junction site is no remediation based on the application of supplemental standards. This proposed strategy is based on a conceptual site model that indicates site-related contamination is confined to a limited-use aquifer as defined in the ground water standards.

  20. DOE`s approach to groundwater compliance on the UMTRA project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Metzler, D.; Gibb, J.P.; Glover, W.A.

    1993-03-01

    Compliance with the mandate of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) at Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites requires implementation of a groundwater remedial action plan that meets the requirements of Subpart B of the US Environmental Protection Agency`s proposed groundwater protection standards (40 CFR 192). The UMTRA Groundwater Project will ensure that unacceptable current risk or potential risk to the public health, safety and the environment resulting from the groundwater contamination attributable to the UMTRA sites, is mitigated in a timely and cost-efficient manner. For each UMTRA processing site and vicinity property where contamination exists, a groundwater remedial action plan must be developed that identifies hazardous constituents and establishes acceptable concentration limits for the hazardous constituents as either (a) alternate concentration limits (ACL), (b) maximum concentration limits (MCLs), (c) supplemental standards, or (d) background groundwater quality levels. Project optimization is a strategy that will aggressively work within the current regulatory framework using all available options to meet regulatory requirements. This strategy is outlined within.

  1. Process for Transition of Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2012-03-01

    This document presents guidance for implementing the process that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) will use for assuming perpetual responsibility for a closed uranium mill tailings site. The transition process specifically addresses sites regulated under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) but is applicable in principle to the transition of sites under other regulatory structures, such as the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.

  2. Guide Title

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE G XXX.X-X xx-xx-20XX Guide Title [This Guide describes acceptable, but not mandatory means for complying with requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not to be construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with associated rule or directives.] U.S. Department of Energy Office of Primary Interest FOREWORD (optional) THE FOREWORD SHOULD DESCRIBE THE DOE REQUIREMENTS, DIRECTIVES, OR RULES THAT MAY BE SATISFIED BY IMPLEMENTING THIS GUIDE. CONTENTS

  3. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    - - - - - - December... - - - - - - 2003 Average... - - - - - - PAD District II January... 106.8 106.7 96.0 91.6 - 93.7 February... 125.0 124.8 114.2 110.7 -...

  4. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    - - - - - - December... - - - - - - 2000 Average... - - - - - - PAD District II January... 94.2 94.1 86.2 80.7 - 83.2 February... 107.0 106.9 NA 93.8 - 96.3...

  5. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    - - - - - - December... - - - - - - 2006 Average... - - - - - - PAD District II January... 182.6 182.4 172.1 167.5 - 168.7 February... 179.6 179.7 168.6...

  6. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    - - - - - - December... - - - - - - 2002 Average... - - - - - - PAD District II January... 74.8 74.8 67.9 62.7 - 64.8 February... 74.0 74.1 69.2 64.0 - 66.1...

  7. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    - - - - - - December... - - - - - - 2005 Average... - - - - - - PAD District II January... 142.1 142.0 134.3 129.2 - 130.9 February... 149.4 149.4 140.9...

  8. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    - - - - - - December... - - - - - - 1999 Average... - - - - - - PAD District II January... 59.7 59.6 51.8 45.8 - 47.4 February... 58.8 58.8 52.1 45.6 - 47.4...

  9. --No Title--

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    - - - - - - December... - - - - - - 2001 Average... - - - - - - PAD District II January... 118.4 118.4 109.6 103.9 - 106.4 February... 117.1 117.2 103.2 98.6...

  10. [DOCUMENT TITLE

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    regarding IWM practices in general b. How many of these growers were already aware of utility SIS programs? i. Among smallmedium growers (< 1,000 acres) ii. Among larger...

  11. --No Title--

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    install radio equipment and cameras on power poles and run power drops to equipment. MotoMesh Deployment Phase II (4486) Y-12 Site Office Oak Ridge Tennessee Jan 5, 2010 Pamela L....

  12. U.S. Department of Energy UMTRA Ground Water Project Ground Water Pumping and Monitoring Plan

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    GWMON 1.12-1 U.S. Department of Energy UMTRA Ground Water Project Ground Water Pumping and Monitoring Plan for the Land Farm Pilot Test Monument Valley, Arizona August 2000 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Ofice Grand Junction, Colorado Project Number UGW-5 1 1-001 5-21-000 Document Number U0106701 This page intentionally left blank Document Number U0106701 Contents Contents 1.0 Introduction

  13. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA project site at Shiprock, New Mexico

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    The site observational work plan (SOWP) for the Shiprock, New Mexico, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site is the initial document for developing site-specific activities to achieve regulatory compliance in the UMTRA Ground Water Project. The regulatory framework used to select the proposed ground water compliance strategies is presented along with a discussion of the relationship of this SOWP to other UMTRA Ground Water Project programmatic documents. The Shiprock site consists of two, interconnected hydrogeologic systems: the terrace system and the floodplain system. Separate compliance strategies are proposed for these two systems. The compliance strategy for the terrace aquifer is no remediation with the application of supplemental standards based on classification of the terrace aquifer as having Class III (limited-use) ground water. The compliance strategy for the floodplain aquifer is active remediation using a subsurface biological barrier. These strategies were selected by applying site-specific data to the compliance framework developed in the UMTRA Ground Water programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) (DOE, 1994a). The site conceptual model indicates that milling-related contamination has impacted the ground water in the terrace and floodplain aquifers. Ground water occurs in both aquifers in alluvium and in fractures in the underlying Cretaceous age Mancos Shale. A mound of ground water related to fluids from the milling operations is thought to exist in the terrace aquifer below the area where settling ponds were in use during the mill operations. Most of the water occurring in the floodplain aquifer is from recharge from the San Juan River.

  14. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA Project site at Riverton, Wyoming

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    The site observational work plan (SOWP) for the Riverton, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site is the first document for the UMTRA Ground Water Project to address site-specific activities to meet compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed ground water standards (52 FR 36000 (1987)). In support of the activities the regulatory framework and drivers are presented along with a discussion of the relationship of this SOWP to other UMTRA Ground Water Project programmatic documents. A combination of the two compliance strategies that will be recommended for this site are no remediation with the application of alternate concentration levels (ACL) and natural flushing in conjunction with institutional controls. ACLs are to be applied to constituents that occur at concentrations above background levels but which are essential nutrients and occur within nutritional ranges and/or have very low toxicity and high dietary intake rates compared to the levels detected in the ground water. The essential premise of natural flushing is that ground water movement and natural attenuation processes will reduce the detected contamination to background levels within 1 00 years. These two recommended compliance strategies were evaluated by applying Riverton site-specific data to the compliance framework developed in the UMTRA Ground Water programmatic environmental impact statement. There are three aquifers beneath the site: a surficial unconfined aquifer, a middle semiconfined aquifer, and a deeper confined aquifer. The milling-related contamination at the site has affected both the surficial and semiconfined aquifers, although the leaky shale aquifers separating these units limits the downward migration of contamination into the semiconfined aquifer. A shale aquitard separates the semiconfined aquifer from the underlying confined aquifer which has not been contaminated by milling-related constituents.

  15. Recommendations for computer modeling codes to support the UMTRA groundwater restoration project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Tucker, M.D.; Khan, M.A.

    1996-04-01

    The Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation Action (UMTRA) Project is responsible for the assessment and remedial action at the 24 former uranium mill tailings sites located in the US. The surface restoration phase, which includes containment and stabilization of the abandoned uranium mill tailings piles, has a specific termination date and is nearing completion. Therefore, attention has now turned to the groundwater restoration phase, which began in 1991. Regulated constituents in groundwater whose concentrations or activities exceed maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) or background levels at one or more sites include, but are not limited to, uranium, selenium, arsenic, molybdenum, nitrate, gross alpha, radium-226 and radium-228. The purpose of this report is to recommend computer codes that can be used to assist the UMTRA groundwater restoration effort. The report includes a survey of applicable codes in each of the following areas: (1) groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling codes, (2) hydrogeochemical modeling codes, (3) pump and treat optimization codes, and (4) decision support tools. Following the survey of the applicable codes, specific codes that can best meet the needs of the UMTRA groundwater restoration program in each of the four areas are recommended.

  16. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA project site at Grand Junction, Colorado

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-01-01

    This site observational work plan (SOWP) is one of the first Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Ground Water Project documents developed to select a compliance strategy that meets the UMTRA ground water standards for the Grand Junction site. This SOWP applies information about the Grand Junction site to the compliance strategy selection framework developed in the UMTRA Ground Water Project draft programmatic environmental impact statement. This risk-based, decision-making framework identifies the decision logic for selecting compliance strategies that could be used to meet the ground water standards. The US Department of Energy (DOE) goal is to implement a cost-effective site strategy that complies with the ground water standards and protects human health and the environment. Based on an evaluation of the site characterization and risk assessment data available for the preparation of this SOWP, DOE proposes that the most likely compliance strategy for the Grand Junction site is no remediation with the application of supplemental standards. This proposed strategy is based on a conceptual site model that indicates site-related contamination is confined to a limited-use aquifer as defined in the ground water standards. The conceptual model demonstrates that the uranium processing-related contamination at the site has affected the unconfined alluvial aquifer, but not the deeper confined aquifer.

  17. Implementation plan for the programmatic environmental impact statement for the Department of Energy UMTRA Ground Water Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-04-01

    Under the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is cleaning up contamination to protect human health and the environment at 24 inactive uranium processing sites located in 10 states. Five of the sites are either on or near Native American lands. The UMTRA Project is divided into two projects: Surface and Ground Water. On November 18, 1992, the DOE issued a notice of intent (57 FR 54374, 1992) to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) for the UMTRA Ground Water Project. The PEIS will result in a record of decision that will determine how the UMTRA Ground Water Project will address ground water contamination resulting from milling operations at the UMTRA Project processing sites. DOE regulations (10 CFR {section} 1021.312) require that an implementation plan be prepared to provide guidance for preparing a PEIS and to record the results of the scoping process. This implementation plan describes and records the results of the PEIS scoping process; summarizes comments received and their disposition; describes the purpose of and need for agency action, the proposed action, and alternatives; lists alternatives considered and eliminated from review; identifies cooperating agencies, their roles, and responsibilities; provides a draft PEIS outline, which includes the planned PEIS scope and content (Attachment A); and provides a schedule for the PEIS process. This plan will be placed in the UMTRA Project libraries listed in Attachment B. The PEIS will identify and evaluate the potential impacts associated with alternatives for conducting the UMTRA Ground Water Project. The PEIS will not assess site-specific impacts; site-specific impacts must be analyzed in separate National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents that will tier off the PEIS. This tiering process will streamline the preparation of site-specific NEPA documents.

  18. NIF Title III engineering plan

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Deis, G

    1998-06-01

    The purpose of this document is to define the work that must be accomplished by the NIF Project during Title III Engineering. This definition is intended to be sufficiently detailed to provide a framework for yearly planning, to clearly identify the specific deliverables so that the Project teams can focus on them, and to provide a common set of objectives and processes across the Project. This plan has been preceded by similar documents for Title I and Title II design and complements the Site Management Plan, the Project Control Manual, the Quality Assurance Program Plan, the RM Parsons NIF Title III Configuration Control Plan, the Integrated Project Schedule, the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, the Configuration Management Plan, and the Transition Plan.

  19. Title I Disposal Sites Annual Report | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    I Disposal Sites Annual Report Title I Disposal Sites Annual Report 2015 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites (March 2016) 2015 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites (March 2016) (35.26 MB) More Documents & Publications Guidance for Developing and Implementing Long-Term Surveillance Plans for UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites

  20. Board Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Site-Specific Advisory Board Topics and Accomplishments EM SSAB Chairs Meeting ● Santa Fe, New Mexico September 2, 2015  Consent Order  Entered into discussions with DOE and NMED concerning hearings and meetings on the Consent Order to address modifications necessary before December 31, 2015. I. The NNMCAB would like the opportunity to provide input into the priorities and sequencing of the Consent Order work. II. NNMCAB could facilitate discussions with DOE and NMED in a public format.

  1. Project Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NE I&C Review Webinar Agenda September 16, 2014 AM Welcome and Overview of LWRS and ART Programs 10:00 Webinar instructions Bruce Hallbert (INL) 10:15 Welcome and Overview of the Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Program and Meeting Objectives Suibel Schuppner (DOE) Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program 10:30 Overview of LWRS Advanced II&C R&D Bruce Hallbert (INL) 11:00 Advanced Outage Control Center Shawn St. Germain (INL) 11:30 Online Monitoring of Material Aging and

  2. UMTRA project water sampling and analysis plan, Riverton, Wyoming

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-03-01

    Surface remediation was completed at the former uranium mill site in Riverton, Wyoming, in 1990. Residual radioactive materials (contaminated soil and debris) were removed and disposed of at Union Carbide Corporation`s (Umetco) nearby Gas Hills Title 2 facility. Ground water in the surficial and semiconfined aquifers (known collectively as the `uppermost aquifer`) below the former mill and tailings site has been contaminated. No contamination has been detected in the deeper, confined sandstone aquifer. The contaminant plume extends off site to the south and east. The plume is constrained by surface wetlands and small streams to the east and west of the site and by the Little Wind River to the south. Fifteen monitor wells installed in 1993 were sampled to better define the contaminant plume and to provide additional water quality data for the baseline risk assessment. Samples also were collected from domestic wells in response to a request by the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality in January 1994. No contamination attributable to the former uranium milling operations have ever been detected in any of the domestic wells used for potable supplies.

  3. Photosystem II

    ScienceCinema (OSTI)

    James Barber

    2010-09-01

    James Barber, Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College, London, gives a BSA Distinguished Lecture titled, "The Structure and Function of Photosystem II: The Water-Splitting Enzyme of Photosynthesis."

  4. Final audit report of remedial action construction at the UMTRA Project Mexican Hat, Utah -- Monument Valley, Arizona, sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-10-01

    The final audit report for remedial action at the Mexican Hat, Utah, Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites consists of a summary of the radiological surveillances/audits, quality assurance (QA) in-process surveillances, and QA remedial action close-out inspections performed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and the Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC); on-site construction reviews (OSCR) performed by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC); and a surveillance performed by the Navajo Nation. This report refers to remedial action activities performed at the Mexican Hat, Utah--Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites.

  5. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA Project site at Monument Valley, Arizona

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    The site observational work plan (SOWP) for the Monument Valley, Arizona, US Department of Energy (DOE) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site is one of the first site-specific documents developed to achieve ground water compliance at the site. This SOWP applies information about the Monument Valley site to a regulatory compliance framework that identifies strategies that could be used to meet ground water compliance. The compliance framework was developed in the UMTRA Ground Water programmatic environmental impact statement (DOE, 1995). The DOE`s goal is to implement a cost-effective site strategy that complies with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ground water standards and protects human health and the environment. The compliance strategy that emerges in the final version of the SOWP will assess potential environmental impacts and provide stakeholder a forum for review and comment. When the compliance strategy is acceptable, it will be detailed in a remedial action plan that will be subject to review by the state and/or tribe and concurrence by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Information available for the preparation of this SOWP indicates active remediation is the most likely compliance strategy for the Monument Valley site. Additional data are needed to determine the most effective remediation technology.

  6. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA Project site at Monument Valley, Arizona

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-03-01

    The site observational work plan (SOWP) for the Monument Valley, Arizona, US Department of Energy (DOE) Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action(UMTRA) Project site is one of the first site-specific documents developed to achieve ground water compliance at the site. This SOWP applies information about the Monument Valley site to a regulatory compliance framework that identifies strategies that could be used to meet ground water compliance. The compliance framework was developed in the UMTRA Ground Water programmatic environmental impact statement (DOE, 1996). The DOE`s goal is to implement a cost-effective site strategy that complies with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ground water standards and protects human health and the environment. The compliance strategy that emerges in the final version of the SOWP will be evaluated in the site-specific environmental assessment to determine potential environmental impacts and provide stakeholders a forum for review and comment. When the compliance strategy is acceptable, it will be detailed in a remedial action plan that will be subject to review by the state and/or tribe and concurrence by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Information for the preparation of this SOWP indicates active remediation is the most likely compliance strategy for the Monument Valley site. Additional data are needed to determine the most effective remediation technology.

  7. TITLE XVII GOVERNING DOCUMENTS

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The following lists documents that provide the statutory and legislative framework for the Title XVII loan guarantee program.

  8. Title | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    154.24 KB) More Documents & Publications Title Slide 1 Instructions for Grant and Loan Recipients

  9. UMTRA Project water sampling and analysis plan, Grand Junction, Colorado. Revision 1, Version 6

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    This water sampling and analysis plan describes the planned, routine ground water sampling activities at the Grand Junction US DOE Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site (GRJ-01) in Grand Junction, Colorado, and at the Cheney Disposal Site (GRJ-03) near Grand Junction. The plan identifies and justifies the sampling locations, analytical parameters, detection limits, and sampling frequencies for the routine monitoring stations at the sites. Regulatory basis is in the US EPA regulations in 40 CFR Part 192 (1994) and EPA ground water quality standards of 1995 (60 FR 2854). This plan summarizes results of past water sampling activities, details water sampling activities planned for the next 2 years, and projects sampling activities for the next 5 years.

  10. Design of UMTRA covers to mitigate the effect of frost penetration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Banani, A.M.; Claire, R.F.

    1994-03-01

    The Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project, contracted by the US Department of Energy (DOE), requires construction of disposal cells for residual radioactive materials from abandoned uranium mill tailings. A disposal cell consists of contaminated material placed within a stabilized embankment with a top cover. The embankment and cover should be effective for up to 1000 years, to the extent reasonably achievable, and in any case for at least 200 years. The embankment cover usually consists of a radon/infiltration barrier, a frost barrier and erosion protection layer consisting of bedding and riprap layers. The radon/infiltration barrier and frost barrier are two important elements of the cover systems. A radon/infiltration barrier is designed to reduce the radon emissions from the contaminated materials and to limit the surface water infiltration into the contaminated material. However, a radon/infiltration barrier has to be protected from repeated freeze-thaw cycles to prevent an increase in permeability. Frost penetration depth is site specific and depends on local climatic conditions and soil properties of the cover system. However, placing a frost barrier is not only very costly but also reduces the disposal capacity of the embankment. Recent laboratory test results indicate that freeze-thaw cycles do not significantly effect the permeability of compacted sand-bentonite mixtures. Therefore, radon/infiltration barriers using sand-bentonite mixtures may not require frost barriers for protection against the effects of freeze-thaw. In this paper the design of UMTRA covers is briefly explained; the criteria to determine a 200 year freeze event, and the frost penetration depth are discussed. The results of freeze-thaw permeability tests on compacted clay and sand-bentonite mixtures are also presented.

  11. Title Standards 2001

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Title evidence must be obtained promptly to avoid delay in payment to landowners and to ... and the abstracter is not entitled to receive payment for such extraneous material. ...

  12. HPC Colony II: FAST_OS II: Operating Systems and Runtime Systems...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Title: HPC Colony II: FASTOS II: Operating Systems and Runtime Systems at Extreme Scale ... task made difficult by the emerging variety of more complex computer architectures. ...

  13. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management 2015 UMTRCA Title I

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    and Title II Disposal Sites Reports Available | Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management 2015 UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites Reports Available U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management 2015 UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites Reports Available June 6, 2016 - 6:22pm Addthis News Contacts Rich Bush, DOE LM UMTRCA Program Lead; (970) 248-6073; richard.bush@lm.doe.gov Bob Darr, Navarro Public Affairs; (720) 377-9672;

  14. Surface and subsurface cleanup protocol for radionuclides, Gunnison, Colorado, UMTRA project processing site. Final [report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-09-01

    Surface and subsurface soil cleanup protocols for the Gunnison, Colorado, processing sits are summarized as follows: In accordance with EPA-promulgated land cleanup standards (40 CFR 192), in situ Ra-226 is to be cleaned up based on bulk concentrations not exceeding 5 and 15 pCi/g in 15-cm surface and subsurface depth increments, averaged over 100-m{sup 2} grid blocks, where the parent Ra-226 concentrations are greater than, or in secular equilibrium with, the Th-230 parent. A bulk interpretation of these EPA standards has been accepted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and while the concentration of the finer-sized soil fraction less than a No. 4 mesh sieve contains the higher concentration of radioactivity, the bulk approach in effect integrates the total sample radioactivity over the entire sample mass. In locations where Th-230 has differentially migrated in subsoil relative to Ra-226, a Th-230 cleanup protocol has been developed in accordance with Supplemental Standard provisions of 40 CFR 192 for NRC/Colorado Department of Health (CDH) approval for timely implementation. Detailed elements of the protocol are contained in Appendix A, Generic Protocol from Thorium-230 Cleanup/Verification at UMTRA Project Processing Sites. The cleanup of other radionuclides or nonradiological hazards that pose a significant threat to the public and the environment will be determined and implemented in accordance with pathway analysis to assess impacts and the implications of ALARA specified in 40 CFR 192 relative to supplemental standards.

  15. Final audit report of remedial action construction at the UMTRA Project, Grand Junction, Colorado, processing site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-02-01

    This final audit report (FAR) for remedial action at the Grand Junction, Colorado, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project processing site consists of a summary of the radiological surveillances/ audits, the quality assurance (QA) in-process surveillances, and the QA final close-out inspection performed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC). The FAR also summarizes other surveillances performed by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). To summarize, a total of one finding and 127 observations were noted during DOE/TAC audit and surveillance activities. The NRC noted general site-related observations during the OSCRs. Follow-up to responses required from MK-Ferguson for the DOE/TAC finding and observations indicated that all issues related to the Grand Junction processing site were resolved and closed out to the DOE`s satisfaction. The NRC OSCRs resulted in no issues related to the Grand Junction processing site requiring a response from MK-Ferguson.

  16. Widget:SetTitle | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Parameters include: title - title text to display Usage: Widget:SetTitle |titleHello World Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleWidget:SetTitle&oldid...

  17. TITLE XVII | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The Title XVII innovative clean energy projects loan program (Title XVII) provides loan guarantees to accelerate the deployment of innovative clean energy technology. The U.S. ...

  18. Title | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    248.05 KB) More Documents & Publications Title Microsoft PowerPoint - FederalReporting Grants Apr 2010 [Compatibility Mode] Recovery Act Recipient Reporting on FederalReporting.gov

  19. Laser ablation ICP-mass spectrometry determination of Th{sup 230} in soils at the Gunnison, Colorado UMTRA site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Anderson, M.S.; Braymen, S.; McIntosh, R.

    1994-02-16

    This report describes an innovative technology, laser ablation-inductively couple plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), operated in a mobile laboratory, to rapidly detect thorium 230 activity levels in soil samples. This technology was demonstrated on-site during November 1993 at the Gunnison, Colorado, UMTRA project site in support of their remediation effort. The LA-ICP-MS sampling and analysis technique was chosen because of the capability for rapid analysis, approximately three samples per hour, with minimal sample preparation.

  20. Applications of permeable barrier technology to ground water contamination at the Shiprock, NM, UMTRA site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Thomson, B.M.; Henry, E.J.; Thombre, M.S.

    1996-12-31

    The Shiprock uranium mill tailings pile in far northwestern New Mexico consists of approximately 1.5 million tons of uranium mill tailings from an acid leach mill which operated from 1954 to 1968. Located on land owned by the Navajo Nation, it was one of the first tailings piles stabilized under the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) project. Stabilization activities were completed in 1986 and consisted principally of consolidating the tailings, contouring the pile to achieve good drainage, and covering the pile with a multi-layer cap to control infiltration of water, radon emanation, and surface erosion. No ground water protection or remediation measures were implemented other than limiting infiltration of water through the pile, although a significant ground water contamination plume exists in the flood plain adjacent to the San Juan River. The major contaminants at the Shiprock site include high concentrations of sulfate, nitrate, arsenic, and uranium. One alternative for remediation may be the use of a permeable barrier in the flood plain aquifer. As proposed for the Shiprock site, the permeable barrier would be a trench constructed in the flood plain that would be backfilled with a media that is permeable to ground water, but would intercept or degrade the pollutants. Work to date has focused on use of a mixed microbial population of sulfate and nitrate reducing organisms. These organisms would produce strongly reducing conditions which would result in precipitation of the metal contaminants (i.e., Se(IV) and U(IV)) in the barrier. One of the first considerations in designing a permeable barrier is developing an understanding of ground water flow at the site. Accordingly, a steady state numerical model of the ground water flow at the site was developed using the MODFLOW code.

  1. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA Project Site at Tuba City, Arizona

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-09-01

    The requirements for ground water compliance for Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites, including the Tuba City, Arizona, site, are found in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act; Subparts B and C of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency`s Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings (40 CFR 192 (1994)), and the associated proposed 1987 standards (52 FR 36000). During the surface remedial action, an estimated 1,400,000 cubic yards (yd{sup 3}) (1,100,000 cubic meters [m{sup 3}]) of uranium mill tailings and other contaminated materials were consolidated and stabilized in place in an unlined disposal cell covering 50 acres (20 hectares). The surface remedial action was completed in April 1990. Ground water beneath the Tuba City site was contaminated by subsurface migration of water from uranium ore processing activities. The main source of contaminants was water from the tailings piles that began in 1956 when the mill opened and ended in 1966 when the mill closed. A total of 800,000 tons (725,000 tonnes) of uranium ore were processed onsite over a 10-year period. Two processes were used to refine the ore: an acid leach process and a sodium carbonate alkaline process. Water from these tailings then seeped into the ground and migrated downward to the ground water. The Tuba City site is currently in a post-stabilization, prelicensing status. The preliminary ground water compliance strategy at the Tuba City site is active remediation. The specific technology to be evaluated is in situ bioremediation. This selection was made because of the potential ability of bioremediation to reduce concentrations to lower levels than a conventional extraction system and to minimize disturbance of the water resource.

  2. Site observational work plan for the UMTRA Project site at Tuba City, Arizona

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    The requirements for ground water compliance for Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites, including the Tuba City, Arizona, site, are found in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act; Subparts B and C of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency`s Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings (40 CFR 192 (1994)), and the associated proposed 1987 standards (52 FR 36000). During the surface remedial action, an estimated 1,400,000 cubic yards (yd{sup 3}) (1,100,000 cubic meters [m{sup 3}]) of uranium mill tailings and other contaminated materials were consolidated and stabilized in place in an unlined disposal cell covering 50 acres (20 hectares). The surface remedial action was completed in April 1990. Ground water beneath the Tuba City site was contaminated by subsurface migration of water from uranium ore processing activities. The main source of contaminants was water from the tailings piles that began in 1956 when the mill opened and ended in 1966 when the mill closed. 800,000 tons (725,000 tonnes) of uranium ore were processed onsite over a 10-year period. The wet tailings remaining after processing were placed as a slurry in three piles at the site. Water from these tailings then seeped into the ground and migrated downward to the ground water. The Tuba City site is currently in a post-stabilization, prelicensing status. The site is expected to remain in this status until licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for long-term surveillance and maintenance. The preliminary ground water compliance strategy at the Tuba City site is active remediation-specific technology to be evaluated is in situ bioremediation. This selection was made because of the potential ability of bioremediation to reduce concentrations to lower levels than a conventional extraction system and to minimize disturbance of the water resource.

  3. Solar Energy Education. Reader, Part II. Sun story. [Includes...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Reader, Part II. Sun story. Includes glossary Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Solar Energy Education. Reader, Part II. Sun story. Includes glossary You are ...

  4. Visualizing Group II Intron Catalysis through the Stages of Splicing...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    SciTech Connect Search Results Journal Article: Visualizing Group II Intron Catalysis through the Stages of Splicing Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Visualizing Group II ...

  5. Lead Hexacyanoferrate(II) Tetrahydrate: Crystal Structure, FTIR...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Lead Hexacyanoferrate(II) Tetrahydrate: Crystal Structure, FTIR Spectroscopy and Thermal Decomposition Studies Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Lead Hexacyanoferrate(II) ...

  6. G Subject: Implementation of Division D, Title III and Title V, and Division E, Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    G Subject: Implementation of Division D, Title III and Title V, and Division E, Title Title VII of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Pub. L. No.113-235 References: Consolidated and Further Continuing Division D, Title III, Sections Appropriations Act, 2015, Pub.L. No. 113-235 301(a), 304, 305, 307, and 310 and Title V, Section 501; Division E, Title VII, Sections 733, 735, 739, 743, 744, 745 and 747 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? The statutory

  7. Title | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Energy Title 49 United States Code (USC) Section 40118 01/03/05 (20.07 KB) More Documents & Publications Appendix B Patent and copyright cases Guidance_Application_Federal_Vacancies_Reform_Act_1998.pdf

    I Disposal Sites (March 2016) 2015 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites (March 2016) (35.26 MB) More Documents & Publications Guidance for Developing and Implementing Long-Term Surveillance Plans for

  8. TITLE48CHAPTER9

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    TITLE 48 CHAPTER 9 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACQUISITION REGULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Subchapter A - General 901 - Federal Acquisition Regulations System 902 - Definitions of words and terms 903 - Improper business practices and personal conflicts of interest 904 - Administrative matters Subchapter B - Acquisition Planning 905 - Publicizing contract actions 906 - Competition requirements 908 - Required sources of supplies and services 909 - Contractor qualifications 911 -

  9. Title 44 Excerpts

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    44 Excerpts The United States Code - Title 44 PUBLIC PRINTING AND DOCUMENTS And Miscellaneous Statutes Identify the Authority of the Joint Committee on Printing 1997 EDITION CHAPTER 5 - PRODUCTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PRINTING AND BINDING Section 501. Government printing, and blank-book work for Congress, the Executive Office, the Judiciary, other than the Supreme Court of the United States, and every executive department, independent office and establishment of the Government, shall be done at

  10. Annual report on the U.S. Department of Energy`s cultural resource activities at Colorado UMTRA Project sites for October 1995--September 1996

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-09-01

    This report summarizes the results of cultural resource activities conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites in Colorado for the period of October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996. The inactive uranium mill tailings sites in Colorado are at Durango, Grand Junction, Gunnison, Maybell, Naturita, Rifle, and Slick Rock. On December 6, 1984, the DOE, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) entered into a programmatic memorandum of understanding (PMOU). This PMOU requires the DOE to fulfillment of its obligations under various state and federal regulations for the protection and preservation of cultural resources. This report provides the state of Colorado with an annual report on the cultural resource activities performed for all UMTRA Project sites in Colorado. Due to the completion of surface activities at the UMTRA Project sites, this will be the last annual report to the state of Colorado. Cultural resources activities subsequent to this report will be reported to the state through site-specific correspondence.

  11. Supplement to the site observational work plan for the UMTRA project site at Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-11-01

    The purpose of this document is to provide additional and more detailed information to supplement review of the site observational work plan (SOWP) (DOE, 1995) for the Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site. This document includes a discussion of the average linear velocity of the ground water in the alluvium and a discussion of the ground water quality of the alluvium, weathered Mancos Shale, and the Tres Hermanos-C Member of the Mancos Shale. The data from a 1989 aquifer test were analyzed using the curve-matching software AQTESOLV and then compared with the original results. A hydrograph of the ground water elevations in monitoring wells screened in the alluvium is presented to show how the ground water elevations change with time. Stiff and Piper diagrams were created to describe the changes in ground water geochemistry in the alluvium/weathered Mancos Sahel unit, the Tres Hermanos-C Sandstone unit, the Tres Hermanos-B Sandstone unit, and the Dakota Sandstone. Background information on other related topics such as site history, cell construction, soil characteristics, and well construction are presented in the SOWP. A geologic cross section depicts the conceptual model of the hydrostratigraphy and ground water chemistry of the Ambrosia Lake site. Hydrogeologic information of each hydrostratigraphic unit is presented.

  12. Supplement to the site observational work plan for the UMTRA Project Site at Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-02-01

    The purpose of this document is to provide additional and more detailed information to supplement review of the site observational work plan (SOWP) for the Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site. This document includes a discussion of (1) the average linear velocity of the ground water in the alluvium; (2) the ground water quality of the alluvium, weathered Mancos Shale, and the Tres Hermanos-C Member of the Mancos Shale; and (3) the fate and transport of contaminants from the uppermost aquifer to the Westwater Canyon Member of the Morrison Formation. The data from a 1989 aquifer test were analyzed using the curve-matching software AQTESOLV and then compared with the original results. A hydrograph of the ground water elevations in monitoring wells screened in the alluvium is presented to show how the ground water elevations change with time. Stiff and Piper diagrams were created to describe the changes in ground water geochemistry in the alluvium/weathered Mancos Shale unit, the Tres Hermanos-C Sandstone unit, the Tres Hermanos-B Sandstone unit, and the Dakota Sandstone. Background information on other related topics such as site history, cell construction, soil characteristics, and well construction are presented in the SOWP. Figure 1 is a geologic cross section depicting the conceptual model of the hydrostratigraphy and ground water chemistry of the Ambrosia Lake site. Table 1 presents hydrogeologic information of each hydrostratigraphic unit.

  13. Mimicking the electron transfer chain in photosystem II with...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    of water oxidation Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Mimicking the electron transfer chain in photosystem II with a molecular triad thermodynamically capable of water ...

  14. Measuring solar reflectance Part II: Review of practical methods...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Measuring solar reflectance Part II: Review of ... A companion article explored how solar reflectance varies with surface orientation and ...

  15. Dwarf Galaxies with Ionizing Radiation Feedback II: Spatially...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Star Formation Relation Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Dwarf Galaxies with Ionizing Radiation Feedback II: Spatially-resolved Star Formation Relation Authors: Kim, ...

  16. TITLE XVII ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE TITLE XVII ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE TITLE XVII ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Various federal environmental laws apply to DOE loans and loan guarantees, ...

  17. TITLE XVII OPEN SOLICITATIONS | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Prospective applicants may use the Title XVII online application portal to apply, or continue on to learn more about the Title XVII application process. Distributed Energy Projects ...

  18. Title IX | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    IX Title IX Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in all educational programs and activities of institutions that receive federal financial assistance. The law states, in part, that: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Click here to

  19. Title VI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    VI Title VI Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance. The law states, in part, that: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The Office of

  20. Implementation of Title V in California

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Werner, B.; Cook, B.

    1996-12-31

    This presentation provides information on California`s Title V operating permit programs for stationary sources mandated by the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments. It covers background, applicability, regulatory history, requirements, and issues. In addition, specific information is provided on the progress of Title V implementation in California, including: the roles of implementing agencies, the status of district Title V programs, number and distribution of Title V sources, cost of Title V implementation, and highlights of Title V implementation in the State. The question and answer format is intended to facilitate easy access to specific information related to the Title V operating permit programs in California.

  1. Process for Transition of Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    II Disposal Sites to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance | Department of Energy Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Process for Transition of Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management for Long-Term

  2. Page 8015 TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE §

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8015 TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE § 17013 § 17013. Advanced technology vehicles manufac- turing incentive program (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Advanced technology vehicle The term ''advanced technology vehicle'' means an ultra efficient vehicle or a light duty vehicle that meets- (A) the Bin 5 Tier II emission standard es- tablished in regulations issued by the Ad- ministrator of the Environmental Protec- tion Agency under section 202(i) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Cotter Canon City Site - 009

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Cotter Canon City Site - 009 Site ID (CSD Index Number): 009 Site Name: Cotter Canon City Site Site Summary: The Cotter site is a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Title II site located in Canon City, Colorado. UMTRA Title II sites are privately owned and operated sites that were active when the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act was passed in 1978. The majority of the milling conducted at these sites was for private sale, but a portion was sold to the U. S. Government.

  4. Ion Effects in the PEP-II High Energy Ring (Technical Report...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Ion Effects in the PEP-II High Energy Ring Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Ion Effects in the PEP-II High Energy Ring We summarize the expected ion effects in the PEP-II ...

  5. Louisiana Title V General Permits

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Boyer, B.E.; Neal, T.L.

    1995-12-31

    Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 requires federal operating permits for all major sources of air pollution. In 1992, Title 40, Part 70 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 70) codified the law s requirements. These federal regulations, entitled Operating Permit Program, define the minimum requirements for state administered operating permit programs. The intent of Title V is to put into one document all requirements of an operating permit. General Permits for oil and gas facilities may be preferred if the facility can comply with all permit requirements. If greater flexibility than allowed by the General Permit is required, then the facility should apply for an individual Title V permit. General Permits are designed to streamline the permitting process, shorten the time it takes to obtain approval for initial and modified permits. The advantages of the General Permit include reduced paperwork and greater consistency because the permits are standardized. There should be less uncertainty because permit requirements will be known at the time of application. Approval times for Initial and modified General Permits should be reduced. Lengthy public notice procedures (and possible hearings) will be required for only the initial approval of the General Permit and not for each applicant to the permit. A disadvantage of General Permits is reduced flexibility since the facility must comply with the requirements of a standardized permit.

  6. Title III hazardous air pollutants

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Todd, R.

    1995-12-31

    The author presents an overview of the key provisions of Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. The key provisions include the following: 112(b) -- 189 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP); 112(a) -- Major Source: 10 TPY/25 TPY; 112(d) -- Application of MACT; 112(g) -- Modifications; 112(I) -- State Program; 112(j) -- The Hammer; and 112(r) -- Accidental Release Provisions.

  7. Title I conceptual design for Pit 6 landfill closure at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    MacDonnell, B.A.; Obenauf, K.S.

    1996-08-01

    The objective of this design project is to evaluate and prepare design and construction documents for a closure cover cap for the Pit 6 Landfill located at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300. This submittal constitutes the Title I Design (Conceptual Design) for the closure cover of the Pit 6 Landfill. A Title I Design is generally 30 percent of the design effort. Title H Design takes the design to 100 percent complete. Comments and edits to this Title I Design will be addressed in the Title II design submittal. Contents of this report are as follows: project background; design issues and engineering approach; design drawings; calculation packages; construction specifications outline; and construction quality assurance plan outline.

  8. Title XVII Final Rule | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Final Rule Title XVII Final Rule Title XVII Final Rule (107.56 KB) More Documents & Publications Final Rule (December 4, 2009) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (August 6, 2009) Final Rule (October 23, 2007)

  9. Title 23 CCR Waters | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 23 CCR WatersLegal Abstract California Code of Regulations, Title 23 Waters, sections...

  10. The United States Code - Printing, Title 44 Excerpts | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The United States Code - Printing, Title 44 Excerpts The United States Code - Printing, Title 44 Excerpts The United States Code - Printing, Title 44 Excerpts PDF icon The United ...

  11. G Subject: Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ... on the 15 th calendar day from April 3 rd which is April 17 th . (b) Access to DOE 301(b) Reporting Page The HCA, or designee, must have a MAX ID and password to access the page. ...

  12. News Release: 2010 UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DOE, Rich Bush, UMTRCA Program Lead (970) 248-6073 Contractor, Bob Darr, S.M. Stoller Corporation Public Affairs (720) 377-9672 Grand Junction, Colo. - The U.S. Department of ...

  13. TITLE

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    The test bed is a Intel Xeon cluster equipped with NVIDIA Tesla GPUs. Index ... The latency-throughput test is based on the Network Protocol Independent Performance ...

  14. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... A blank was processed in a similar manner and proved to be quite clean. The TEM samples ... substrate during .two long, unplanned storage periods at NTS. It was not possible to 1 ...

  15. TITLE

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES * LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY The COSC-1 deep borehole project in Sweden - Examples for subsurface characterization associated with the UFD deep borehole disposal project Pat Dobson UFD Meeting June 8, 2016 EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES * LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY COSC-1 - Study of Seve Nappe COSC-1 BASEMENT EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES * LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Core Drilling - 2.5 km hole 100 % core recovery HQ to 1616

  16. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... The actual dimenaioneof the 1 cavity are classified national-security information. For ... The sctuai situation is most likely a combination classified as aquifers in this report. ...

  17. Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Jamie Brown Director, Earth & Mineral Sciences Division EPAct Complementary Program Update January 25, 2008 Office of Research and Development Introduction NETL's EPAct 999 Complementary R&D Program * Overview of the 4 research areas: - Drilling Under Extreme Conditions (DUEC) - improve the economic viability of drilling for and producing from domestic deep (>15, 000ft) and ultra-deep (>25,000ft)O&G resources. - Environmental Impacts of O&G (EI) - provide unbiased

  18. Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Gantt chart for proposed seedling extension How does the stress field vary as influenced by extensive workings, from large- scale (mine-wide) to intermediate scale (kISMET site) ? How does rock fabric (e.g., foliation in schist) affect fracturing under a given local stress field? How do existing fractures affect fracturing and stimulated permeability? Can distributed permeability be created in a foliated crystalline rock? Can permeability be controlled, e.g., to eliminate fast-flow paths, by

  19. Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments on DOE's Upcoming 2012 Congestion Study Keith White California Public Utilities Commission December 15, 2011 2 General Comments ◊ California has been fully participating in west-wide "economic" transmission studies (TEPPC since 2006, recently with much-appreciated ARRA funding) ◊ The 2005 Energy Policy Act gives DOE unclear scope regarding "congestion," and a requirement to consult with states. The following are essential: * Clearly address the specific rationale

  20. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    of the water resources of the State and represents the water supply presently available to Nevada. Respectfully Poland D. Westergard State Engineer WATER FOR NEVADA yield. ...

  1. Title:

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Phys Med Biol 1984; 29: 1537-1554. 8 . ' 21. Mijnheer BJ, Wootton P, Williams JR, Eenma J, Pamell, CJ. Uniformity in dosimetry protocols for therapeutic applications of fast ...

  2. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... MAXHID cm 10514 6911 525 25 20 5827 7721 21 71 9i2 16fi 271 262 PERU ID ... PERU ID cm 1 63 61 6026 3917 40 51 2113 196 41 20 61 51 40 30 ...

  3. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  4. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    . . . . . . . . -, , / AMC 000102 ( Nevada DOE/NV--1106-REV. 1 1 Environmental Restoration Project Subsurface Completion Report for Amchitka Underground Nuclear Test Sites: Long Shot, Milrow, and Cannikin Revision No.: 1 September 2006 Approved for public release: further dissemination unlimited Environmental Restoration Project U.S. Department Of Energy National Nuclear Securlty Administration Nevada Sile OMW i - Available for public sale, in p a p from: U.S. Department of Commerce National

  5. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    AMCHITKA BIOLOGICAL IWODlATION S J M U I i Y Prspard for tho U. S. Atoric En~rny C d a a i o n undmr Contract No. A T (26-11-171 MTTkUE Colrubua LaboratoriRa 505 Kirq A V ~ R Collubua. Ohio 43201 Printed i n t h e U n i t d S t a t ~ of A l r r i w . A v a i h b l e f t o l - Nrtio-1 Technical I n f o r m t i o n Servic* U. S. D e p a r t u n t o f C o W t E P Sprinlf i a l d , v i + # i n b 22151 Thim r e p o r t naa p r e m r d a m an account of w x k mpon~ored by t h e United S t r t a a

  6. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Watec Resources Canter 1 I EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW AND TRANSPORT AT THE FAULTLESS UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR TEST, CENTRAL NEVADA TEST AREA I prepared by I Karl P o h l m a ~ , Jenny Chapman, Ahmed Hassan, and Charalambos Papelis ! submitted to Nevada Operations M c e U.S. Department of Energy SEPTEMBER 1999 Publication No. 45165 @ C F J C This report uas prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of

  7. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    R I - DOEM\r/13609-27 a r n w s a r a s w n r m ~ ~ l l f i ~ h l ~ l ~ ~ ~ CNT 000047 A Validation Process for the Groundwater Flow and Transport Model of the Faultless Nuclear Test st Central Nevada Test Area Prepared by Ahmed Hassan submitted to Nevada Site Office National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy Las Vegas, Nevada 1 JANUARY 2003 Publication No. 45197 A division o f 'be V n f ~ w s f p and CommLmfty Coll~ge System of . l ' n w & Reference herein to any

  8. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    CNT OW048 Review of Environmentally Sensitive Resources at Off-Site Locations Nevada Test Site Nevada ~nvironmental Restoration Review of Environmentally Sensitive Resources at Off-Site Locations Prepared for: U.S. Deparuncnt of Energy Nevada Field Office Las Vcgas, Nevada R e p d by: l T Corporation Las Vcgas, Nevada Work Pcrformcd Under Conmct DE-AC08-92NV10972 March, 1993 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  9. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  10. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    68 OFF C . 2 Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1993 . I \ . j Environmental Restoration Sensitive Species Su wey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1 993 Environmental Restoration 1 Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico Prepared for: U.S. Deparunenr of Energy Environmental Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Officc Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-851 8 Prepared

  11. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    I 2950 kd OFF C . 3 Ill I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 GSB 000018 PROJECT GASBUGGY SITE ESTORATW FINAL REPORT JULY I903 UNITED S T A T E S DEPARTMENT O F ENERGY NEVADA O P E R A T I O N S OFFICE A . Background ............................................. B Authority ............................................. C . Bestoration Objectives ................................. LI . IKTIAL SITE STATUS ......................................... A Land#

  12. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  13. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  14. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  15. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mi w u United S taies Office of Radiation a ~ d EPA 8 Environmental Protection Indoor Air Dcccmbcr 1999 Q Agency Washington, DC 304hC) EPA-402-R-93-0 12 Q w 0 4 : 0 0 0 4 &€PA Annual Water Samp and Analysis Ca endar Year 1999: RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 1999 RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site

  16. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    902 GEN-BKS - - - . I 111 111 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l Ill SHL 000024 United States Office of Radiation and EPA-402-R-94-001 Environmental Protection Indoor Air January 2004 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2003: SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RI0 BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2003 SHOAL Test Site Area

  17. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    OEce of Radiation and 12nvirorunentai Protection Indoor Ailr Washington., DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2000: R'ULISON Tes,t Site Area RLO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Tes it Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site, Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2000 RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area by Max G. Davis

  18. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ~ ~ l l R R l l l l l l l i l ~ l ~ I R u 0 0 0 0 ~ f A Class 111 Cultural Resources Survey of the U. S. Department of Energy Rullson Gas Stimulation Test S f e Garfield County, Colorado December 1993 IT be?: tlX'i;j PBBRARII Environmental Restoration 1 A Class Ill Cultural Resources Survey of the U. S. Department of Energy Rulison Gas Stimulation Test Site Garfield County, Co torado December 1 993 Environmental Restoration A Class Ill Cultural Resources Survey of the U . S . Department of

  19. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    RU L 000002 I United States Office of Radiation and EPA-402-R-02-00? Environmental Protection Indoor Air February 2002 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2001: RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2001 RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area

  20. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    - . ' R U L 000003 United States Office of Radiation and ~ ~ ~ - 4 0 2 7 ~ - 0 2 - 0 0 7 Environmental Protection 1ndoor Air November 2002 Agency Washington, DC 20460 &EPA Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2002: SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2002 SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO

  1. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado December 1 993 Environmental Restoration Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results tor the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89 193-85 18 Prepared By: l T CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View Blvd., Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Performed under Contract No: DE-AC08-92NV 10972

  2. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado December 1 993 & \ Environmental Restoration Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Environmentaf Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89 193-85 18 Prepared by: IT CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View BIvd., Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Performed under Contract No. DE-AC08-92NV 10972 December 1993

  3. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    SHOAL AREA TRACER TEST EXPERlIMENT prepared by Rosemary Carrolt, Todd Mihevc, Greg Pohll, Brad Lyles, Sean Kosinski and Rich Niswonger submitted to Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy Las Vegas, Nevada NOVEMBER 2000 Publication No. 45177 Reference herein to any specific commercial pmduct, process, or service by trade name, trademark, mufacturer, or otherw~se, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or

  4. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ill lllIlllllllllllllllllllllllIII1 SHL 000035 Letter Report Contaminant Boundary at the Shoal Underground Nuclear Test prepared by Greg Pohll and Karl Pohlmann Division of Hydrologic Sciences Desert Research Institute University and Community College System of Nevada submitted to Nevada Sitc O f i c e National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Deparuncnt of Enagy Las Vegas, Nevada August 6,2004 The work upon which this report is based was suppomd by the U.S. Department of Energy under

  5. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    TAKE- s - United States Department of' h e Interior - - FISH AND WII.,DLIFE SEKWC:E =!am I I 4600 Kiotrk. Lam, Building C-125 -no, ~ e v a d a 89502-5093 SHL 000036 January 13, 1993 File No. 1-5-93-83-90 Ms. Brenda 5 . Reuter International Technology Corporation 4330 South Valley View, Suite 114 Las Vegam, Nevada 89103 Dear Ma. Reuterr subject: spocies ~ i n t for the Propnod central Nevada and shoal Te$t Aream in Nevada As requested by your letter dated Doc- 23, 1992, we have enclomed a list of

  6. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY BACKQROUND RESEARCH REPORT Off-NfS Cukural Rasowcmr Studks: Background Research for Project Shot11 Prepared by Maureen King Alvin R. McLane and William Gray Johnson MAY 1993 DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY BACKGROUND RESEARCH REPORT Off-NTS Cultural Resources Studies: Background Research for Project Shoal Prepared by Maureen King Alvin R. McLane and William Gray Johnson Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Las Vegas, Nevada

  7. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  8. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  9. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  10. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Plates are not available in electronic format. Please e-mail lm.records@lm.doe.gov to request the appendix.

  11. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Plates are not available in electronic format. Please e-mail lm.records@lm.doe.gov to request the appendix

  12. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    right-of-way in, on, over and across Tract 101-E as described below, for the location, ... Lamar, State of Mississippi, to-wit: m C T 101-E A right-of-way 70 feetwida lying'and ...

  13. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Survey Results for Neigh boring Properties of the Alba Craft Site Oxford, Ohio U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Index / / { i s / . . ....................................................... s. Main s t r a e t f i o w e s 3 . . (~1-008,012-014,016) : : , . W . Rose Avenue Properties ............................... .:. ........... I . . .97 (017) Linden Street Properties .................................................... 103 (010-011) Municipd Landfill h

  14. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    SURVEY OF PHASE I r REMEDIAL ACnONS ALBANYRESFARcEcmTEu AzBANy,OaEGON E A. Powell R B. S l a m JUNE W l This report is based on work performed under contract number DE-AC05-760R00033 with the US. Department o f Enew. This draft report bas not been given full review and patent clearance, and the dissemination o f its information is only f o r official use. No release to the pubIic shall be made without the approval o f tbe Office of Communication Resources, Oak Ridge Assodated U n i v d t k 0 7 8

  15. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Distribution Category: Remedial Action nnd Ikco~issioning Progrnm (UC- 70A) A R - HhTIOaAL lABORlrTORY 9700 South Cnss Avenue Arsoune, Illinois 60439 Prepared bp R. A. Uynveen Associate Division Director, OHS W. H. Smith Senior Health Physicist C. . Sholeen Health Physicist A. L. Just- liealth Physicist K. F. Flynn Eealth Phymicist hdiologicnl Sumey Group Health Physics Section O c c u p n t i o ~ l Bealth and Safety Division June 1983 Work Performed under Budget Activity WE m-03-60-40 and AUL

  16. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ENGINEERING EVALUATION O F SELECTED REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES FOR THE ALBANY RESEARCH CENTER, ALBANY, OREGON J U N E 1 9 8 5 Prepared for UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT O F ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE Under Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 Bechtel National, InC. Advanced Technology Division Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel J o b No. 14501 SPECIAL NOTE This Preliminary Engineering Evaluation of Selected Remedial Action Alternatives (EEA) was originally prepared in early 1984. In the EEA, three

  17. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ADDENDUM TO THE HAZARD ASSESSMEHT FOR RADIOACTIVE CONTAnINATION IN AND BENHATB CERTAIN BUILDINGS AT TBE ALBANY RESBARCH CKNTER ALBANY, OREGON MARCH 1992 Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Field Office Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R2 19 49 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 Page F i g u r e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i v T a b l e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i v Acronyms . . . . . . . . . .

  18. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Bechtel Inferoffice Memorandum TO G. L. Palau Subject Scoping Notice:' Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing., Inc . Site, Fairf ield, Ohio copies to T. E. Morris G. R. Gale W & J. S. Allison File No. 7440/124 Date November 1, 1994 Frcm D. D. Sexton MS of ES &H ~t Oak Ridge ~ x t . 4-3643 SCOPING NOTICE INTRODUCTION The purpose of this scoping notice is to formalize the identification and application of federal and state rules and regulations that may apply to the cleanup of

  19. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Departmentaof ~ n e r ~ ~ Washington, DC 20585 IdkY O 3 1993 Mr. James Besl President Force Control Industries 3660 D i x i e Hrghway F a i r f i e l d , Ohio 45014 Dear M r . Besl : This i s t o n o t i f y you t h a t the U.S. Oepartlaent o f Energy (WE) has designated the former Associate A i r c r a f t Tool and Manufacturing Company s i t e i n F a i r f i e l d , Ohio, f o r remedial a c t i o n as a p a r t o f the Formerly U t i l i z e d Sttes Remedial Action Program. Remedial a c t i v

  20. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    10 G . Drexel/ M. Poligone F i l e no. 7315/124 s b j e c t Determination of Additional D o t e Contaminated Areas at AAS March 17, 1994 Copies to J. Allison G. Palau K. Thompson A. John At Oak Ridge Ext. 6-5173 The purpose of this memorandum is t o provide results from characterization activities at the Former Associated Aircraft Site (AAS) in Fairfield, Ohio. Additional areas of contamination requiring remediation were identified during these activities. Areas that are currently known to

  1. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Distribution Subject EIN: Ohio Hazardous Waste Regulations Copier t o G. R. Galen G. L. Palau F i l e No. 7440/124, 135 ate January 10, 1995 Frm D. D. Sexton TDS of ES&H ~t Oak Ridge ~ x t . 4-3643 BACKGROUND This Environmental Information Notice (EIN) provides detailed regulatory guidance concerning compliance with the Ohio Hazardous Waste Code. This EIN is based on research of the Ohio Administrative Code (OACI and conversations of a generic nature with the federal Environmental Protection

  2. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ~overnment Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office memorandum DATE: January 19. 1995 SUBIECT: USE OF EXEHPTIOW FROW DEPhRTnEKl OF ENERGY ORDER 5820.2A F O R RADIOhCTIVE WASTE FROn FUSlUl To: James A. Turi , Director, O f f i c e o f Program Support, O f f i c e o f the Deputy Assistant Secretary Waste Clanagelent, M-33, TREY I I This m r a n d u n serves t o n o t i f y 01-33 o f the F o m r l y U t i l i z e d Sites Remedial Action Program's (FUSRAP] i n t e n t t s dispose o f

  3. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    FORCE CONTROL INDUSTRIES,'INC. 1 2 3 0 7 2 CONTROL %60 Dixie Hwy.. Zip 45014 P.O. Box l a . Z p 45018 11W b l e . Sule F Failfield. Ohio T w M i g a n a8083 Phone: (513) 868-0900 Phone: !B10) 52441= FAX. (513) 868-2105 F . U i81C.l 52d-1208 C,ir Shear Clutch & Brake Systems November 10.1994 U. S. Deparbnent of Energy Oak Ridge Operations office Ann: AD-424, Katy Kates P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Dear Ms. Kates, In furtherance of the August 24,1994 letter from Doug Shook, his subsequent

  4. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    R i i e . Tennessee 37831 -8723 J u l y 18, 1995 Mr. Graham H i t c h e l l , Environmental Manager Ohio Envi r o n e n t a l Protection llgency Southwest O I s t r i c t O f f l c e 40 South H r i n Street Dayton, Ohio 45402 Dear Hr. M i t c h e l l : MUMD hSSESSHEKT FOR RESIDUAL COHTMINATION AT THE FORMER CISSOClATE AIRCRAFT SITE ( M S ) Enclosed i s a copy of the Hazard Assessment t h a t was performed f o r the Former Associate A i r c r a f t S i t e (MS) fn F a i r f i e l d , Ohio. In

  5. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    State of ohlo Env~ronmental Protectton Agency PROVISIONAL ID NUMBER O H P

  6. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    O Distribution pile 10. 7 4 4 0 / 1 2 4 , 135 s & ; ~ t EIN: Ohio ~azardous D ~ I C February 6 . 1995 Waste Regulat ions; Empty Container Rule ~ r - D . D. Sexton C-ics lo T. E. Morris& G. R. Galen G . L. Palau This Environmental Informat ion Notice ( E I N ) provides regulatory guidance concerning compliance with the Ohio Hazardous Waste regulations for residues of hazardous waste in empty containers or inner liners Ie.g.. the Empty Container Rule). This EIN is based on research and

  7. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    -. i . , . United States Government L-u+-tw / S / V ~ f Department of nersy memorandum D i T E June 0 5 , 1995 FEP-Y ATTK OF: EM-421 (U. A. Williams, 301-903-8149) SUGJECT Hazard Assessmnt f o r Radioactive Contamination a t the Associate. A i r c r a f t Site, F a i r f i e l d , Ohio To L. Price, OR This memorandum i s t o ' provide comments and approval o f the Associate i r ft i t n f o r e n ' i A r c a S eHazardAssessmet I d t i f e d S o i l C ~ m i n a t i o n . The hazard assessment was

  8. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    .-, EFZ. lor-%., United States Governmerit memorandum DATE: FEB 2 1 1991 MEPLY TO EM- 421 ATTN OF: SUBJECT: A u t h o r i t y Determination--8&T Metals i n Columbus, Ohio TO: The F i l e The attached review documents the basis f o r determining whether DOE has a u t h o r i t y f o r t a k i n g remedial a c t i o n a t the BaT Metals f a c i l i t y i n Columbus, Ohio, under the Formerly U t i 1 ized Sites Remedi a1 Action Program (FUSRAP). The B&T Hetals f a c i l i t y was used by the

  9. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    T O G. L. Palau Subject Scoping Notice: The B&T Metals Site, Columbus, Ohio F i l s No. 744011 13 ~ a t t February 26, 1996 F P m l D. D. Sexton b of Environmental Compliance EX^. Oak Ridge ~t 4-3643 BACKGROUND The purpose of this Scoping Notice is to formalize the identification and evaluate the application of federal and state rulcs and regulations that apply to the cleanup of the B&T Metals site, located in Columbus, Ohio. This environmental compliance evaluation is based on

  10. Title:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... In a monsoon convection cell there is constant wind flowing from the ocean to land, driven by solar heating. Suggested Follow-Up Activities * Collect current newspaper articles ...

  11. <Title>

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Leibniz-Rechenzentrum (LRZ), Garching b. Mnchen, Germany Collaborators: V. Karakasis, N. ... M. Petkova, K. Dolag (USM Mnchen, Germany) Optimisation strategy Gadget3: ...

  12. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    i n support o f theARC cleanup e f f o r t include: pub1 i c meetings on the nature o f cleanup measures, waste. management, and waste transportation routes, i n t e r v...

  13. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... measurements are lacking, the general climatic data and obser- vations on the climate and botany of NTS indicate that evapotranspiration equals or exceeds annual ...

  14. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    EASTERN PART OF JACKASS FLATS, NEVADA TEST SITE, SOUTHERN NEVADA By Rulon C. Christensen ... eastern Jackass Flats, Nevada Test Site, southern Nevada -:--* * In pocket Figure 1.'.' ...

  15. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Baseline vegetation contamination at safety test sites on the NTS and Tonopah Test Range. Describes concentrations of transuranics onin native vegetation sampled on NTS and TTR in ...

  16. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Noteworthy Mammal Distribution Records for the Nevada Test Site (RE: "Great Basin ... NOTEWORTHY M A M M A L DISTRIBUTION RECORDS FOR THE NEVADA TEST SITE Philip A. M.'clic-u' ...

  17. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Ecological studies of vertebrates in plutonium-contaminated areas of the Nevada Test Site ... of four Nevada Applied Ecology Group (NAEG) study areas of the Tonopah Test Range (TTR). ...

  18. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Geologic map of the Nevada Test Site, Southern Nevada. Geographic Features of NTS and upland Areas. Author Frizzell, Jr. V.A. and J. Shulters 101056 Document Date 1190 Document ...

  19. Title:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3-5 Rainfall and the Water Table: The Salinity of Soil http://education.arm.gov Rainfall and the Water Table: The Salinity of Soil: Grades 3-5 1 Rainfall and the Water Table: The Salinity of Soil Approximate Time Setup and initial experiment: 45 minutes, followed by several short time segments to observe, record, and add water to soil. Objective The student will be able to explain how an increase of rainfall influenced by climate change can affect the water table and soil salinity underground as

  20. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Averages (1981-1967), October 56 I i i i i i i 12 15 18 21 24 Hour of Day MST Graph HI-24. Daily March of Wind Speed, 7-Year Averages (1961-1967), November 57 w -*-> o Ti O "S...

  1. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    D bo a 10 12 15 18 21 24 Hour of Day MST Graph HI-20. Daily March of Wind Speed, 7-Year Averages (1 961-1967), July 53 Hour of Day MST. Graph ni-21. Daily March of Wind Speed,...

  2. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... caldera complex are intercalated with the major ash flow sheet, from the complex, and analyses of the lavas fit well on compositional trends determined by the ash flow sheets. ...

  3. Title:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    with which a very hot, practically ...education.arm.gov Thermal Expansion of Water: Grades 9-12 2 * ... appropriate to balance the incident solar radiation. ...

  4. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... The mobile system is mounted in a small van with a portable power supply and transported ... Vegetation appeared to be the most important influence fn decreasing wind-borne ...

  5. Title

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Studies of fluorescence of this oil have been carried out over a wide spectrum of exciting ... loss of 200 Mev Fig. 3. Decay Associated Spectrum of 123 M solution of Vitamin E in ...

  6. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Gary Forwarding routing: Les Price, PSRD Bill Seay, FSRD Dave Adler, PSRD Loren Marz, PSRD ... Radioactive contamination at the site is a result of uranium extrusion activities which ...

  7. TITLE

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Approval Prior DOE written approval is required for the following actions: 1. Contractor award of any subcontract having a value of 500,000.00 or greater, or any subcontract...

  8. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Concentrations and External Gamma Radiation Exposure Rates at Background Locations ... samples were below the minimum detectable amounts 1 for gross alpha and beta radiation. ...

  9. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    regarding mncentratiom in soil samples and radiation measurements inside the house. ... Biased samples were either oollected because elevated radiation above backgmund was ...

  10. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Peripheral Properties (Private and City-owned) * DOE is facilitating cooperation between the City of Monticello and a private landowner to clean a sediment catch basin on City-owned ...

  11. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    To occur in spring 2007. Former Mill site * No significant activity or issues to report * The former millsite restorations are in good condition. Peripheral Properties (Private and ...

  12. Title

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    | 1 Carbon emissions Gigatons CO 2 e * End-use consumption Quadrillion BTUs * Includes carbon ... Primary energy End-use energy Electricity CHP Gas Oil Other Carbon emissions 100% ...

  13. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... conducted various operations involving thorium and uranium for the Atomic Energy ... GUIDELINES Radioactive contamination at ARC consists primarily of thorium-232 residues. ...

  14. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... (AEC) involving the melting, machining. welding, and alloying of thorium. Additional work with uranium and thorium was also performed at ARC for the Energy Research and Development ...

  15. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... operations at the site involved melting, machining, welding, and producing thorium alloys. ... The radiological surveys performed indicated that the major contaminant at ARC was thorium...

  16. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... for AEC that involved melting, machining, welding, and alloying thorium. Additional work with uranium and thorium was conducted for the Energy Research and Development ...

  17. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... persons with extreme positions that have an emotional or economic rather than an ecological base. * Work performed under the auspices of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. ...

  18. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... MAP 12 CONTAMINATED AREAS REPORT DATED 10-10-92 PAGE 13 of 22 GRAVEL GERTIE U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION NEVADA TEST SITE WITH REFERENCE STAKES REYNOLDS ELECT. AND ENGR. CO., INC. ...

  19. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    A Supplement to the U.S. Department of Energy Guidelines for Residual Radioactive Material ... The basis for the guidelines is generally a presumed worst-case plausible-use scenario for ...

  20. Title

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Brad Tomer Director, Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil EPACT Section 999 Federal Advisory Committee Meetings January 28-29, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil ...

  1. Title

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    External Developments Division Do financial investors destabilize oil prices? The opinions ... Motivation * Oil price surged with increasing momentum between 2003-2008 before falling in ...

  2. Title

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oil & Natural Gas R&D National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Fossil Energy 2008 ... John R. Duda, Deputy Director Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil January 30, 2008 ...

  3. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    under date of kcember 7 , 1966, an oil and gas l e a s e was entered i n t o ... R ? S 6f the working, royalty, ar ather oil snd gas interests I n the U n i t Area. ...

  4. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Volume Projections 3.0 Work Plan 3.1 Design Engineering 3.2 Access Agreements 3.3 ... by the end of the calendar year. 3.1 DESIGN ENGINEERING From February to May 1987, ...

  5. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pages 12 and 13 are unavailable Appendix B is unavailable

  6. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    D*APR 0 2 1987 muym NE-23 A m OR W C I : Revised Guidelines f o r Resldual R a ... r h j c h should be d l s t r i b u t e d w i t h i n the n e x t f e w weeks. ...

  7. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    and Deconlssioning (D&D) Program w i t h i n t h e U.S. department o f Energy ... t e o r f a c j l t t y are f n compliance w i t h established c r i t e r i a , ...

  8. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... Extract- .f?" 6 Strontium 90 Alpha , ,,. (Net) (PC1 > 1 0 i | j"l O ' * Oil * i * ... indicate that the discharge varies widely and is greatest shortly after heavy rains. ...

  9. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    6141297-2300 Fax: 297-241 1 OH I 0 HISTORICAL SOCIETY SlSCE 1885 February 23, 1996 David G. Adler, Site Manager F o m r Sites Restoration Division Department of Energy Oak...

  10. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    dating, and nomenclature of Mississippian rocks along these transects of the outer carbon- ate platform and Antler foreland basin are shown in five time-rock correlation charts...

  11. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Three scenarios were considered in which it was assumed that the site would be used without radiological rest"ctions for a period of 1,000 years followiilg remedial action. The ...

  12. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    These regions included the ground zeros of above-ground nuclear tests, underground tests that vented, and some safety ... including an amplifier and power supply, a pulse-height ...

  13. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Department of Energy Gasbuggy Stimulation Test Site Rio Arriba County, New Mexico ... Department of Energy Gasbuggy Stimulation Test Site Rio Arriba County, New Mexico ...

  14. Title:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    kg Gasoline 1 liter 2.3 kg Diesel 1 gallon (USA) 9.95 kg Diesel 1 liter 2.7 kg Key Vocabulary * Acre: The easiest way to visualize an acre is as a rectangle measuring 88 yards by...

  15. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Box 2501.301 L b o n t a y R o d , O d ; R I 3 7 8 3 1 35. L. K Ria, Fcrma Sks Ra' " Wi&m, Oak Ridge Fmld U . S . -of Emgy, P . O . Bolt 2001, Ollr Ridge. TN 37831-8723 3 6 . ...

  16. TITLE

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    excluded from further NEPA review and documentation. 1 0 -3-'ry Patricia W. Phillips, O R 0 NEPA Compliance Officer Date Based on my review and the recommendation of the...

  17. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... three new programs. Section 3.1.4 provides further details on these new programs. * Green Energy Futures Park * Kistler Launch Facility (KLF) Work-for-others programs NNSANV ...

  18. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    During tlic course of ecological studies con- ducted tit the Atomic Energy Commission test ... The Sal-'.- Thrasher (Orcoacuptea montannx). Green- tailed Towhce (Chlonirti chloruru), ...

  19. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    This work was performed by EG&GEM for the United States Departments of Energy under ... individuals: David C. Anderson, Ron A. Green, Danny L. Rakestraw, and Cathy A. Wills. ...

  20. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN AUGUST, 1991 BY E G 8 G ENERGY MEASUREMENTS, INC. TION ALLUVIAL FAN ... AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AND AMPT INFILTRATION KINEMATIC WAVE: NEW ...

  1. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... These include such species as: Mallard, Pintail, Green-winged Teal, Bufflehead, Ruddy ... RESUME The U. S. Energy Research and Development Administration's Nevada Test Site (NTS) ...

  2. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... L , : L - C ' , . ; k ' v k Giles to the public (Smith, et al., 1980). The ... The Georgia Veterinarian, Vol. 24, No. 3. Smith, D. D., K. R. Giles and D. E. Bernhardt. ...

  3. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... ZONE VALLEY, REESE RIVEB, AND SMITH: CREEK VALLET lone and Reese River Valleys were more ... The Paradise Range which bounds lone Valley and the Desatoya Mountains which bound Smith ...

  4. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... Photo 28 (Photo YM-196) Etfie Smith (Las Vegas Indian Center) at Stte 15 . 89 Photo 29 ... .91 Photo 33 (Photo YM-8) Edward THo" Smith (Chemehuevi) Holds Examples of the Lrthic ...

  5. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... Observations of regional strain variations (Smith and Kind, 1972) from strain meters in ... The apparent lack of correlation of stress relaxation with seismic activity led Smith and ...

  6. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... The population of Lathrop Wells in 1984 was reported as 45 (Smith and Coogan, 1984), ... Series Report 54, 25p. Smith, D.D. and J.S. Coogan, 1984. Population ...

  7. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... SYSTEM (17) 106 Antelope Valley 107 Smith Valley 108 Mason Valley 109 East Walker ... Valley 133 EDWARDS CREEK VALLEY (19) 134 SMITH CREEK VALLEY (20) 123 RAWHIDE FLATS (21) ...

  8. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... Cattle As discussed by Gilbert et al. (1988) and in greater detail by Smith (1979), a ... These data are given by Smith (1979) and were used by Gilbert et al. (1988) to estimate ...

  9. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... Especially does it reflect the efforts of James L. Reveal, University of Maryland and the Smith- sonian Institution, whose contributions began with the first intensive plant ...

  10. Title

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... Hamilton, R. M., B. E. Smith, F. G. Fischer, and P. J. Papanek, 1971. Seismicity of the ... Hamilton, R. M., B. E. Smith, J. C. H a l l , and J. H. HeaIy, 1969. Summary of Seismic ...