Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

AHAM Letter Acknowledging DOE Letter on Verification Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2013 26, 2013 By E-Mail Ms. Kathleen B. Hogan Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Ms. Hogan: I am writing regarding your letter dated April 26, 2013, in which the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) adopted a new policy regarding DOE ENERGY STAR verification

2

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

3

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

4

Letter from the Nuclear Energy Institute to DOE GC | Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from the Nuclear Energy Institute to DOE GC Letter from the Nuclear Energy Institute to DOE GC Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost...

5

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior...

6

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers After granting several waivers establishing an alternative test procedure for residential clothes washers, DOE sought the views of interested parties regarding the proper implementation of these waivers. Whirlpool responded to the DOE's inquiry with a number of comments to recommend a course of

7

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers Letter to DOE General Counsel from Whirlpool Senior Counsel, Re: Implementation of Alternative Test Procedure for Large Capacity Residential Clothes Washers After granting several waivers establishing an alternative test procedure for residential clothes washers, DOE sought the views of interested parties regarding the proper implementation of these waivers. Whirlpool responded to the DOE's inquiry with a number of comments to recommend a course of

8

Letters  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This letter to the editor takes a deeper look at the March issue's theme of gender diversity in computing. Keywords: letters, Computer, gender, diversity, computer science, education

2013-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE 0-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors Rule 15 July 2013. EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors Rule 15 July 2013. This memorandum memorializes a communication between DOE staff and members of the NEMA Motor and Generator Section in connection with this proceeding. NEMA thanks the DOE for the opportunity to conduct training for DOE staff and its consultants on July 15th, 2013 which illustrated the different types of motors, motor construction theory and motor applications by type. It is our hope that better understanding of motor types and construction will assist the Department and its consultants with the discharge of their duties. EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors

10

DOE-L.__ PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS - COVER LETTER AND  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

L.__ PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS - COVER LETTER AND L.__ PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS - COVER LETTER AND VOLUME I, OFFER AND OTHER DOCUMENTS (a) Instruction - Cover Letter. The cover letter shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The solicitation number. (2) The name, address, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and electronic addresses of the Offeror. (3) A statement identifying any exceptions or deviations the Offeror is taking to the terms and conditions specified in the contract (Sections A through K of this solicitation, as amended). However, exceptions and/or deviations are not sought and the Government is under no obligation to enter into discussions. Exceptions or deviations may constitute a deficiency. (4) The names, titles, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and

11

Preparing and Submitting a Phase I Letter of Intent | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

and Submitting a Phase I Letter of Intent and Submitting a Phase I Letter of Intent Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) SBIR/STTR Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Applicant and Awardee Resources Preparing and Submitting a Phase I Letter of Intent Preparing a DOE SBIR/STTR Phase I Grant Application Useful Documents for Awardees Commercialization Assistance Other Resources Awards SBIR/STTR Highlights Reporting Fraud Contact Information Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer U.S. Department of Energy SC-29/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-5707 F: (301) 903-5488 E: sbir-sttr@science.doe.gov More Information » Applicant and Awardee Resources Preparing and Submitting a Phase I Letter of Intent

12

Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, C. Phillips, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters - please see document for full distribution list, including SSAB Administrators, Designated Deputy Federal Officers, SSAB Federal Coordinators and Office Site Managers The letter is in regards to progress made to date in implementing a direct DOE relationship and funding for the EM Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 22, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management

13

Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, C. Phillips, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters - please see document for full distribution list, including SSAB Administrators, Designated Deputy Federal Officers, SSAB Federal Coordinators and Office Site Managers The letter is in regards to progress made to date in implementing a direct DOE relationship and funding for the EM Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 22, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management

14

Microsoft Word - 120511 DoE Letter.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2011 5, 2011 Office of the General Counsel Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585-0121 Memorandum for the Record Ex Parte Communication Department of Energy Meeting of November 29, 2011, 2:00 - 3:30 p.m TO: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov (sent via email) Re: Ex Parte, Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-DET-0040; RIN Number 1904-AC52 On November 29, 2011, William Check of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association ("NCTA"), 1 Paul Glist of the law firm of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, and I met with Daniel Cohen, Betsy Kohl, and Celia Sher from the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") Office of General Counsel, and John Cymbalsky and Jeremy Dommu from DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to discuss the above-referenced

15

Microsoft Word - NERC_DOE_EIA_letter_411comments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3353 Peachtree Road NE Suite 600, North Tower Atlanta, GA 30326 404-446-2560 | www.nerc.com May 6, 2013 Rebecca Peterson Energy Information Administration Dear Ms. Peterson, NERC truly appreciates the opportunity to provide preliminary technical guidance and input for the 2014 development of Form EIA-411 "Coordinated Bulk Power Supply Program Report." As a way of background, NERC provides electric system and reliability data to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and serves as the electric utility industry's point of contact with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the EIA, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on electric system and reliability data reporting

16

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Acquisition Regulation Date May 25, 2001 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the Procurement Executives of DOE and NNSA. Subject: COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WHISTLEBLOWER ACTIONS References: DEAR 931.205-47(h) DEAR 952.216-7, Alt II DEAR 970.3102-05-47(h) DEAR 970.5232-2, Payments and Advances When Does this Acquisition Letter Expire? This Acquisition Letter will expire when this guidance is distributed as an Acquisition Guide section or otherwise superseded. Whom Do You Contact for More Information? Contact Terry Sheppard of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 586-8193 or terry.sheppard@hq.doe.gov Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for information on Acquisition Letters and other policy

17

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

No. 2009-04 No. 2009-04 Acquisition Regulation Date 02/12/09 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Management of Excess Weapons Inventories and Selective Sensitive Equipment. References: 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 109-1, Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Property Management Regulations 48 CFR 52.245-1, Government Property DOE Guide 580.1-1, DOE Personal Property Management Guide DOE Order 580.1-1, DOE Personal Property Management, Contractor Requirements Document (CRD), Attachment 2, as set forth in the DOE O 580.1 Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation 970.5245-1, Property Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 45, Government Property

18

Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) HEPAP Home Meetings Members .pdf file (20KB) Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (44KB) HEP Committees of Visitors HEP Home Charges/Reports Interim Transmittal Letter dated July 27 2005 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page July 27, 2005 Harold T. Shapiro, Chair Sally Dawson, Vice Chair Elementary Particle Physics 2010 Committee The National Academies 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Dear Harold and Sally, Thank you again for your letter of March 15, 2005 to me as Chair of the High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) and for the opportunity to answer your questions about the International Linear Collider (ILC) along the broad themes of 1) the physics case, 2) the research and development

19

Letter of Support  

Management & Sponsors ... Our office will prepare a letter for ... and confirms LLNL's commitment to collaboration via a DOE approved mechanism if ...

20

Enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2003 10, 2003 Mr. John Christian [ ] BNFL, Inc. East Tennessee Technology Park Portal No. 8, Building K-761 P.O. Box 5689 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Subject: Enforcement Letter- Noncompliance Tracking System Reports and May 14-15, 2003, Price-Anderson Amendments Act Program Review Dear Mr. Christian: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) review of the facts and circumstances related to several Price-Anderson noncompliances, which are documented in the following Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports * NTS-ORO--BNFL-K33-2003-0001, "Weaknesses in BNFL's Issue Screening Process to Determine PAAA Noncompliance." This report documents that the BNFL PAAA Review Board failed to correctly identify and report the vast majority of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Microsoft Word - 10 0726 Letter re DOE NBP RFI on Data Access w resolution.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 26, 2010 July 26, 2010 Maureen C. McLaughlin VIA E-Mail: broadband@hq.doe.gov Senior Legal Advisor to the General Counsel Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585. RE: NBP RFI: Data Access In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid; Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy, 75 Federal Register 33611 (June 14, 2010). Dear Ms. McLaughlin: On May 11, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking comments from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding current and potential practices and policies for States and other entities to empower consumers (and perhaps others)

22

December 16, 2005, Board letter regarding the new DOE Manual on Integrated Safety Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6,2005 6,2005 The Honorable Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S W Washington, DC 20585- 1000 Dear Secretary Bodman: The Department of Energy (DOE) submitted its implementation plan for Recommendation 2004- 1 , Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations, to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) on June 10,2005. Commitment 22 under that implementation plan deals with issuing and implementing expectations for DOE organizations regarding the implementation of Integrated Safety Management (ISM). In particular, Deliverable B is a new DOE Manual on ISM. The due date associated with the manual is December 2005. It is important to note that ISM has been one of the primary success stories of the defense nuclear complex. Your staff has been working with the Board's staff to achieve a satisfactory

23

Microsoft Word - Elizabeth Chimento January 18 letter to DOE.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Honorable Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Re: District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Dear Secretary Bodman: In the above referenced order, responding to the D.C. Public Service Commission's petition, several inaccurate statements relating to environmental issues compel attention and correction. First, and most egregious, is the DCPSC, PJM and PEPCO contention that "the plant operating at full power does not exceed emissions limits contained in the plant's operating permit and therefore the operation of the plant pursuant to the DOE Order would not violate the Clean Air Act." In referring only to the state operating permit,

24

Microsoft Word - Letter to DOE re Request for Information.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2012 8, 2012 Lamont Jackson Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Re: DOE Request for Information on Questions Related to Permitting of Transmission Lines, 77 Fed. Reg. 11517 (Feb. 27, 2012) Dear Mr. Jackson: I am writing in response to the above-referenced Department of Energy (DOE) Request for Information that was published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2012. WGA is currently engaged in an open and transparent stakeholder process to develop recommendations that will address the challenges of siting and permitting major transmission projects in the Western States. We will release a draft report for comment soon and we are sponsoring an

25

Microsoft Word - LG response to DOE letter to clothes washer waivers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LG ELECTRONICS LG ELECTRONICS 1776 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 By email: GC_comments@hq.doe.gov December 7, 2010 Scott Blake Harris, Esq. General Counsel United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Alternative test procedure for large-capacity clothes washer models Dear Mr. Harris, Thank you for seeking the views of interested parties concerning implementation of an alternative test procedure for large-capacity clothes washer models, i.e., those in excess of 3.8 cu ft. You appropriately state that the situation you have described presents a set of "unique circumstances." LG Electronics' suggestions herein are crafted in light of these unique circumstances. As discussed herein, LG Electronics believes that there is a relatively simple and

26

December 20, 2005, Department letter forwarding the revised version of the Department's draft Manual DOE M 450.4-X, Integrated Safety Management System Manual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

20, 2005 20, 2005 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Ave, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004 Dear Mr. Chairman: This letter transmits to you a revised version of the Department of Energy's draft Manual DOE M 450.4-X, integrated Scffety Manugeinent System Manual. This revised version represents a significant improvement over the November 2,2005 version previously provided to your staff. This improvement occurred by addressing internal DOE comments on the Manual. The Department has also addressed various informal comments provided by your staff. The Department remains interested in the Board's comments on this Manual. Please forward any comments regarding this draft document by January 18, 2006. If you have any

27

Division Sponsor Letter  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

SAMPLE FUNDRAISING LETTER This letter may be used by Annual Meeting session chairs when soliciting funds

28

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACQUISITION LETTER ACQUISITION LETTER AUTHORITY This Acquisition Letter (AL) is issued by the Procurement Executive pursuant to a delegation from the Secretary and under the authority of the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) subsection 901.301-70. CONTENTS CITATION TITLE DEAR Part 933 Protests, Disputes, and Appeals I. Purpose. This AL establishes policy and provides guidance for the use of alternative dispute resolution techniques in connection with disputes that arise under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) of 1978, 41 U.S.C. sections 601-613. This AL revision deletes references to "district court" which were incorrectly cited in paragraph four of the Policy section. II. Background. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a range of procedures

29

Enforcement Letter - Chicago  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Shirley Strum-Kenny Shirley Strum-Kenny [ ] Stony Brook University Hospital Administration Building, Room 310 Stony Brook, NY 11794-0701 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-CH-BH-BNL-BNL-1998-0004) EA-1999-02 Dear Dr. Strum-Kenny: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning an event at the Radiation Therapy Facility (RTF) occurring in March 1998. In November 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine whether violations of DOE's nuclear safety rules associated with the event had occurred. The resulting Investigation Summary Report was transmitted to you on February 19, 1999. On March 11, 1999, you participated in an Enforcement Conference, along with Brookhaven Science Associates (BSA) management, to discuss the occurrence, its

30

Enforcement Letter - ELBN022603  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2003 26, 2003 Mr. Frederick A. Tarantino [ ] Bechtel Nevada 2621 Losee Road North Las Vegas, NV 89030-4129 Subject: Enforcement Letter - Bechtel Nevada Authorization Basis Noncompliances Dear Mr. Tarantino: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) review of the facts and circumstances related to certain nuclear safety noncompliances during 2002 at the Nevada Test Site. These noncompliances were identified in the process of conducting a limited Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) Program Review of Bechtel Nevada during November 14-15, 2002, by DOE's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE), in coordination with DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). These matters are being called to your attention through this

31

Enforcement Letter - Idaho  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 1999 0, 1999 Mr. Steve Laflin [ ] International Isotopes Idaho Inc. 2325 West Broadway, Suite D Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-ID--LITC-TRA-1999-0001) Dear Mr. Laflin: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the relocation of an irradiated [isotope] pellet from within a hot cell to an adjoining, outside, charging port service area. This incident occurred on January 6, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is utilized by International Isotopes Idaho Inc. (I4) for the preparation of irradiated materials for distribution. During March 23-24, 1999, DOE conducted an investigation to determine

32

Enforcement Letter - Chicago  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16, 2002 16, 2002 Dr. Peter Paul, [ ] Brookhaven Science Associates Brookhaven National Laboratory Building 460 P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Paul: This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of three reports of noncompliances with quality assurance and/or occupational radiation protection provisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). These issues, described below, were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff and involved procurement and/or control of radioactive sources. 1. On January 19, 2001, BNL reported that an [radioactive] neutron source in an unlabeled package had been moved from a posted High Radiation Area to radiologically controlled

33

Enforcement Letter - KHLL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site P.O. Box 464 Golden, CO 80402-0464 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report: NTS-RFO--KHLL-771OPS-1997-0002 Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of Energy=s (DOE) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The potential noncompliances involved inadequate implementation of work controls, specifically failure of workers to perform required surveillance of the Fire Protection System. The failure to fully perform the required surveillance was identified by Safe Sites of Colorado (SSOC) on June 2, 1997, and reported to DOE in the subject Noncompliance Tracking System report on June 26, 1997.

34

Enforcement Letter - Idaho  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dr. Bernard L. Meyers Dr. Bernard L. Meyers [ ] Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 1625, MS 3898 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-ID--BBWI-TRA-1999-0001) Dear Dr. Meyers: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the contamination of personnel while performing a hot cell exhaust system filter replacement. This incident occurred on July 21, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's (INEEL) Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is used by International Isotopes Idaho, Inc. (I4) for the preparation of irradiated materials for commercial distribution. During February 29 through March 2, 2000, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear

35

Enforcement Letter - Argonne West  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 1999 9, 1999 Mr. John I. Sackett [ ] Argonne National Laboratory-West P.O. Box 2528 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403-6000 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-CH-AA-ANLW-ANLW-1998-0001) Dear Mr. Sackett: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning two incidents occurring in June and August 1998 at Argonne National Laboratory - West's (ANLW) Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF): dropping a fuel basket assembly containing chopped fuel elements and repair of a manipulator seal tube. During November 2-3, 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear safety regulations may have been associated with these incidents. A copy of the investigation summary report is

36

CA IOUs Comment Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2012 June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers.

37

Enforcement Letter - Idaho  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2000 2000 Dr. Bernard L. Meyers [ ] Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 1625, MS 3898 Idaho Falls, ID 83414 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Meyers: This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE) regarding noncompliances with requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) occurring at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). The investigation reviewed five issues reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC (BBWI) and two Quality Program assessment reports. Two of the NTS reports involved specific events that occurred before October 1, 1999, when BBWI began operating INEEL but was responsible for implementing corrective actions. The remaining three reports involved programmatic

38

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24, 2001 24, 2001 Ms. M.P. Delozier [ ] CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. MSIN: H6-08 2440 Stevens Center Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Ms. Delozier: This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE), regarding potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830, "Nuclear Safety Management," occurring at the Hanford Tank Farms. The investigation reviewed three issues that were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. Two of the NTS reports involve the failure to perform the Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) for [ ] gas monitoring. The initial potential noncompliance occurred in January 2000, in which a Zip Cord was installed in a catch tank without first monitoring for [ ]

39

Enforcement Letter - Rocky Flats  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2000 1, 2000 Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Highway 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of noncompliance report number NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-2000-0005, which describes noncompliances with the design and procurement requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(iii) requires that procured items and services shall meet established requirements and perform as required; 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(ii) requires that design work including changes, shall incorporate applicable requirements and design bases; 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(iv) requires that inspection and testing of specified items, services, and processes shall be conducted

40

Enforcement Letter - WSRC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2003 4, 2003 Robert A. Pedde, [ ] Westinghouse Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Building 703-A/Room A203 Aiken, SC 29808 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Criticality Safety Violations (NTS-SR-WSRC- HCAN-2002-0001) Dear Mr. Pedde: This letter addresses Criticality Safety Violations that have occurred at the H-Canyon facility during a 15-month period from February 2002 through June 2003. The DOE Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these violations and is dismayed that they are both programmatic and recurring in nature. Indeed, in one case a criticality safety defense noncompliant condition existed since November 1996. Our review of these events identified multiple work process deficiencies that contributed to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

NNSA POLICY LETTER  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

POLICY LETTER POLICY LETTER Approved: 6-20-13 WEAPON QUALITY POLICY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of Defense Programs NAP-24 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://hq.na.gov Weapon Quality Division THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NAP-24 1 6-20-13 WEAPON QUALITY POLICY 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this document, NNSA Weapon Quality Policy (NAP-24), is to identify the quality requirements applicable to weapon activities of the NNSA, NNSA contractors and subcontractors. The requirements contained herein are in addition to the scope of quality requirements found in DOE Order 414.1D, Quality Assurance. NAP-24 establishes specific weapon and weapon-related product focused quality requirements for designing, producing and

42

NNSA POLICY LETTER  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

POLICY LETTER POLICY LETTER Approved: 12-11-13 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of the Administrator NAP-26 CONTROLLED COPIES AVAILABLE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.nnsa.energy.gov Office of Quality Management THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NAP-26 1 12-11-13 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 1. PURPOSE. Establish, implement, maintain, assess, and improve the Quality Management System (QMS) for NNSA Federal operations in compliance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standard Requirements document (ISO 9001:2008), Quality Management Systems, and in accordance with DOE Order 414.1, Quality Assurance. 2. CANCELLATION. None. 3. APPLICABILITY. a. The provisions of this NNSA Policy document apply to all the NNSA's Federal

43

RFP Invitation Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Invitation Letter (Rev. 5, 11/22/10) Invitation Letter (Rev. 5, 11/22/10) Page 1 of 3 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Acquisition Services Management (ASM) Division Subcontracts, ASM-SUB P.O. Box 1663, Mail Stop D447 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 505-665-3814 E-mail: dknox@lanl.gov Date: August 7, 2013 Subject: Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms / Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 241314 Greetings: Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) invites you to submit a Fixed Price proposal for the Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms. The procurement of these two (2) platforms is in support of the following: a. The New Mexico Alliance for Computing at Extreme Scales (ACES), residing within:  Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and

44

Enforcement Letter - ELBNI032504  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25, 2004 25, 2004 Mr. J. P. Henschel [ ] Bechtel National Inc. 3000 George Washington Way Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Concrete Work Issues Dear Mr. Henschel: This letter addresses eleven instances that have occurred at the Waste Treatment Plant during a 14-month period form August 2002 through October 2003 in which concrete work was not performed to established procedures and standards. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these concrete work issues and is concerned with the work process you have in place to inspect concrete work prior to pour. In addition, OE is concerned with your failure to correct these known problems in a timely manner. It is our expectation that Bechtel

45

Enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2002 9, 2002 Mr. Alan Parker [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Highway 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Subject: Building [ ] Uptake Event of October 5, 2001 Dear Mr. Parker: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's evaluation of facts and circumstances concerning the October 2001 unplanned uptakes of radioactive material by two Radiological Control Technicians (RCT) in Building [ ]. These issues were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff (NTS-RFO--KHLL-[ ] 2002-0001) on February 11, 2002. One RCT received a committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE) of 1.6 rem, and the remaining RCT received 240 millirem (mrem) CEDE. While these exposures do not

46

Letter: Meyerhofer  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This letter confirms that the Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE) was an important part of the FY10 NIF Polar Drive Exploding Pusher experiments on the National Ignition Facility (NIF). These experiments were designed by LLE to produce requested neutron yields to calibrate and qualify nuclear diagnostics. LLE built a deuterium-tritium filling system for the glass shells and provided them to LLNL for mounting. In FY10, four exploding pusher implosions were performed with measured neutron yields within a factor of two of requested and ion temperatures within 20% of requested. These implosions are proving to be an ideal platform for commissioning the nuclear diagnostic suite on the NIF and are achieving all of the objectives planned for this campaign.

Mackinnon, A J

2011-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

47

Enforcement Letter ELPNL050404  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2004 5, 2004 Dr. Leonard K. Peters, [ ] Batelle Memorial Institute Pacific Northwest Division P.O. Box 999 902 Battelle Blvd. Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Peters: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-RL-- PNNL-PNNLNUCL-2003-0004. Our evaluation included review of the causal analysis, corrective actions, additional supporting information, and discussion with Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL) personnel. The subject NTS report described multiple deficiencies identified through a DOE-RL assessment of contamination control and survey practices associated with

48

Enforcement Letter - Richland  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 1997 7, 1997 Mr. H. J. Hatch [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., H5-20 P.O. Box 1000 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Noncompliance Numbers NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0001 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0002 NTS-RL--PHMC-TANKFARM-1997-0003 Dear Mr. Hatch: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of potential violations of the Quality Assurance Rule (QA Rule) nuclear safety requirements identified in the subject reports. Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated, as Management and Integrating contractor for the DOE's Hanford site, has responsibility for assuring sub-tier contractors comply with its Quality Assurance Plan. On April 27 and 28, 1997, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation personnel met with members of your staff and representatives from Lockheed Martin Hanford Company (LMHC). Our purpose

49

Acquisition Letters Archives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Letters Archives Acquisition Letters Archives Acquisition Letters Archives 95-06, 06/28/95, Personal Property Letter System 95-14, 11/17/95, PDF, Subcontracts Under the New Independent States Program 96-09, 9/16/96, PDF, Full and Open Competition - Management & Operating Contracts 98-11, 9/18/98, PDF, Waiver of Synopsis Requirements 99-04, 6/23/99, PDF, Consortium Buying 99-06, 8/27/99, PDF, DOE Authorized Subcontract for Use by DOE M&O Contractors with New Independent States Scientific Institutes Through the International Science & Technology Center Attachment to AL 99-06 Model Subcontract 2000-05, 5/17/2000, PDF, DOE Authorized Subcontract for Use by DOE M&O Management and Operating (M&O) Contractors with New Independent States' Scientific Institutes through Science and Technology in Ukraine

50

Why the xE distribution triggered by a leading particle does not measure the fragmentation function but does measure the ratio of the transverse momenta of the away-side jet to the trigger-side jet  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Hard-scattering of point-like constituents (or partons) in p-p collisions was discovered at the CERN-ISR in 1972 by measurements utilizing inclusive single or pairs of hadrons with large transverse momentum ($p_T$). It was generally assumed, following Feynman, Field and Fox, as shown by data from the CERN-ISR experiments, that the $p_{T_a}$ distribution of away side hadrons from a single particle trigger [with $p_{T_t}$], corrected for of fragmentation would be the same as that from a jet-trigger and follow the same fragmentation function as observed in $e^+ e^-$ or DIS. PHENIX attempted to measure the fragmentation function from the away side $x_E\\sim p_{T_a}/p_{T_t}$ distribution of charged particles triggered by a $\\pi^0$ in p-p collisions at RHIC and showed by explicit calculation that the $x_E$ distribution is actually quite insensitive to the fragmentation function. Illustrations of the original arguments and ISR results will be presented. Then the lack of sensitivity to the fragmentation function will be explained, and an analytic formula for the $x_E$ distribution given, in terms of incomplete Gamma functions, for the case where the fragmentation function is exponential. The away-side distribution in this formulation has the nice property that it both exhibits $x_E$ scaling and is directly sensitive to the ratio of the away jet $\\hat{p}_{T_a}$ to that of the trigger jet, $\\hat{p}_{T_t}$, and thus can be used, for example, to measure the relative energy loss of the two jets from a hard-scattering which escape from the medium in A+A collisions. Comparisons of the analytical formula to RHIC measurements will be presented, including data from STAR and PHENIX, leading to some interesting conclusions.

M. J. Tannenbaum

2007-02-16T23:59:59.000Z

51

Letter: The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on Transuranic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on Transuranic Waste Management Letter: The Environmental Management SSABs Recommendations on Transuranic Waste Management From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Citizens Advisory Board 1055 This letter is in response to a March 29, 2003, letter regarding the recommendations on transuranic (TRLD waste management suggested by the Office of Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Roberson Letter - June 2, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

52

Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: Wade Waters, Chair, Savannah River Citizens' Advisory Board This letter is in response to a July 29, 2003 letter regarding implementation of the guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - August 15, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Regarding Delegation of Designated Federal Officials for Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

53

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

54

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

55

EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors Rule 15 July 2013. EERE-2010-BT-STD-0027 Ex Parte Letter NEMA Motor Training re DOE Motors Rule 15 July 2013. This...

56

Enforcement Letter - KHLL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site P.O. Box 464 Golden, CO 80402-0464 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report: NTS-RFO--KHLL-771OPS-1997-0002 Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of...

57

Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2003 12, 2003 Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair INEEL Citizens Advisory Board North Wind, Inc. 545 Shoup Avenue, Suite 200 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 Dear Mr. Wilson: In response to your letter of November 21, 2003, regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs), I first want to assure you that the Department of Energy views the SSABs as crucial to accomplishing our cleanup mission. The SSABs represent a strong commitment by the Department to continue its relationship with communities surrounding the EM sites by considering community concerns and values in the Department's decision-making process. Your letter makes a persuasive case for using short-term option # 1: "Execute DOE Support Services Contract w/ a

58

DOE/NV/26383-LTR2008-01 Letter Report Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative - Air Quality Scoping Study for Caliente, Lincoln County, Nevada  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is performing a scoping study as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain Environmental Monitoring Systems Initiative (EMSI). The main objective is to obtain baseline air quality information for Yucca Mountain and an area surrounding the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Air quality and meteorological monitoring and sampling equipment housed in a mobile trailer (shelter) is collecting data at eight sites outside the NTS, including Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Beatty, Sarcobatus Flats, Rachel, Caliente, Pahranagat NWR, Crater Flat, and Tonopah Airport, and at four sites on the NTS (Engelbrecht et al., 2007a-d). The trailer is stationed at any one site for approximately eight weeks at a time. This letter report provides a summary of air quality and meteorological data, on completion of the site's sampling program.

J. Engelbrecht; I. Kavouras; D. Campbell; S. Campbell; S. Kohl; D. Shafer

2009-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

59

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters January 25, 2010 DOE issued letters to 25 manufacturers of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) involving various models after PEARL Cycle 9 testing indicated that the models do not meet the ENERGY STAR specification and, therefore, are disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program. When a product is disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program, all corresponding packaging and supplier's products will be disqualified as well. CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Communication Memo Realizing Building End-Use Efficiency with Ermerging Technologies Identifying Cost-Effective Residential Energy Efficiency Opportunities for the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative

60

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters January 25, 2010 DOE issued letters to 25 manufacturers of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) involving various models after PEARL Cycle 9 testing indicated that the models do not meet the ENERGY STAR specification and, therefore, are disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program. When a product is disqualified from the ENERGY STAR Program, all corresponding packaging and supplier's products will be disqualified as well. CFL Manufacturers: ENERGY STAR Letters More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Communication Memo Identifying Cost-Effective Residential Energy Efficiency Opportunities for the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative Realizing Building End-Use Efficiency with Ermerging Technologies

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

NNSA POLICY LETTER  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

POLICY LETTER Approved: 12-11-13 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of the Administrator NAP-26 CONTROLLED COPIES AVAILABLE AT: INITIATED BY:...

62

Appendix A. Request Letter  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall Appendix A. Request Letter U.S. Energy Information...

63

DMP ENFORCEMENT LETTER ELDMP102804  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28, 2004 28, 2004 Mr. C. Delbert Marcum [ ] Diversified Metal Products, Inc. 3710 N. Yellowstone Highway P.O. Box 1404 Idaho Fall, Idaho 83403 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies Dear Mr. Marcum: This letter addresses deficiencies associated with the fabrication of four transportainers delivered under contract to Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) in support of their Characterization and Repackaging Modular Unit development. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed your performance in delivering these transportainers and is concerned with the quality assurance aspects of your work activities in fabricating the transportainers. Specifically, three areas of deficiency were noted and are provided below in more detail:

64

Letter to Grossenbacher | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter to Grossenbacher Letter to Grossenbacher Letter to Grossenbacher This letter refers to the Department of Energy (DOE) investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with the fume hood fire that occurred in building TRA-668 at the Reactor Technology Complex on June 12, 2007, and the electrical shock of two firefighters responding to a wildland fire at the Idaho National Laboratoryon July 14, 2007. The results of our investigation were discussed with you and members of your staff on November 8, 2007, the final day of the onsite portion of our investigation, and provided to you in an lnvestigation Report dated December 5, 2007. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - WEA-2008-01, Preliminary - March 20, 2008 More Documents & Publications

65

Questions excerpted from November 25, 2009 letter from Exelon Business Services Company to DOE Smart Grid Task Force Director Eric Lightner  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 1 9, 2010 1 Property Issues Property Issues 1. Property Encumbrance Background: DOE regulations do not allow lien to be put on equipment or real property purchased with grant money without approval of the DOE contracting officer. However, utilities routinely use mortgages that constitute a first lien in favor of bondholder to fund their assets. Absent relief from DOE, utilities would be required to seek consent of bondholders to exclude the applicable equipment from mortgaged property, and the grant awardees cannot assure that any such consent will be obtainable in every case. In addition, the cost of obtaining this consent would be significant. Some Recipients believe that such costs would be incurred for purposes that do not advance

66

EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recommendations & Letters EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-03 Included recommendations, letters, and other related...

67

March 20, 1998, DOE letter forwarding response to Board letter...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Office of Field Management is coordinating complex-wide implications of the transformer issue. We anticipate sending a final response to you no later than April 13,1998....

68

December 22, 1999, DOE letter responding to Board letter dated...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Chip Oxidation facility for disposal. Twenty percent complete. SCD: 4100 Testing with CZT crystals is complete, and will lead to reduced measurement time and greater confidence...

69

Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, at Barbara Binney@hq.doe.gov or at (202) 287-1340 Policy Flash 2013-51.pdf Policy Flash 2013- Attachment AL 2013-05 FAL 2013-03 April 24 2013 final.pdf Attachment 1 DOE Section 311 Contract Award letter FY2013 April 26.pdf Attachment 2A DOE Section 311 Financial Assistance Letter FY2013 April 26.pdf Attachment 2B DOE Section 311 Financial Assistance Letter FY2013 April 26.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2014-04 Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014 -- Congressional

70

JEA Letter of Interest 2007  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3222007 RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST PURPOSE AND SCOPE JEA is requesting Letters of Interest (LOI) from companies interested in providing renewable...

71

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho - March 31, 2006 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho - March 31, 2006 Idaho - March 31, 2006 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho - March 31, 2006 March 31, 2006 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC, related to External Radiation Dosimetry Accreditation Issues at the Idaho National Laboratory This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding a quality assurance-related deficiency stemming from the recent external radiation dosimetry performance testing by the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) of dosimeters utilized at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This deficiency was identified through the quality assurance testing of external dosimeters by CH2MWG Idaho (CWI) staff. Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1095-2011 Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill - October 4, 2004

72

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 August 4, 1998 Issued to Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company related to a Repetitive Problem with Instrument Operability at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report for noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120, "Quality Assurance Requirements." The NTS report addresses a repetitive problem of maintaining the operability of radiation monitoring instrumentation and systems referenced in nuclear facilities authorization

73

Enforcement Letter -Chicago-02/24/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2000 4, 2000 Yoon I. Chang, PhD [ ] Argonne National Laboratory-East 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439-4832 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-CH-AA-ANLE-ANLE-1999-0009) Dear Dr. Chang: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the above referenced Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report describing bioassay program deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory- East (ANL-E). This report was submitted to DOE on December 23, 1999. Approximately thirteen months previous to this NTS report's submittal, DOE's Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-Enforcement) issued to all DOE and contractor Price-Anderson Amendments Act coordinators a memorandum explaining EH-Enforcement's experience with and concern regarding contractor bioassay program

74

Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

03 03 The Honorable J. Gresham Barrett U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Barrett: Thank you for your August 8, 2003, letter regarding my guidance memorandum providing direction for restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). I share your concern that "inhibiting the ability of the community to engage in dialogue with the Department of Energy on issues affecting the cleanup efforts" would be undesirable, and I want to assure you that my SSAB guidance memorandum does not affect that important relationship. In no way does it change my policy or support regarding the value and importance of the EM SSABs.

75

Enforcement Letter - Argonne-East  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 1997 3, 1997 Dr. William H. Hannum Argonne National Laboratory-East 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Il 60439 Re: Noncompliance Report NTS-CH-AA-ANLE-ANLE-1996-0001 Dear Dr. Hannum: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the failure to complete the required radiological worker training or retraining for approximately 30 percent of ANL-E's 797 radiological workers, was identified by ANL-E on December 17, 1996, and reported to DOE on December 20, 1996. On November 22, 1996, ANL-E initiated a review of the personnel training records of a

76

AHAM DOE Verification Test Agreement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Verification Test Agreement AHAM DOE Verification Test Agreement This letter is to inform AHAM that DOE is adopting a new policy regarding DOE ENERGY STAR verification testing...

77

Letter: Transition of Closure Sites from the Office of Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Organizations From: Deputy Secretary of Energy, Kyle E. McSlarrow (DS-1) To: Todd Martin, Chair, Hanford Advisory Board This letter discusses the transition of closure sites...

78

December 11, 2002, Board letter forwarding Recommendation 2002...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to DOE in a Board letter dated April 23,2002. 2. During a review at the Y-12 National Security Complex, the Board noted that the fire protection program for Building 92 12 B-l...

79

Enforcement Letter - Hanford - 04/16/2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2002 6, 2002 Mr. Kent A. Campbell [ ] Fluor Federal Services 1200 Jadwin Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Campbell: This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of a December 18, 2001, report of noncompliances with the information requirement provision of 10 CFR 820.11. The noncompliances, described below, were identified by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and involve employees of your company. 10 CFR 820.11 requires that any information pertaining to a nuclear activity provided to DOE or maintained for inspection by DOE shall be complete and accurate in all material respects. This provision applies to documentation associated with personnel training requirements for access to nuclear facilities.

80

Preserved Access to Abstract Letter Identities Despite Abolished Letter . . .  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this paper, we discuss the letter processing difficulties of a patient (MS) with pure alexia after left hemisphere stroke who is unable to read any words aloud despite preserved writing and good performance at naming orally spelled words. MS is completely unable to name visually presented letters even though she can name them when they are presented in other modalities. Despite her poor naming, she can distinguish correctly oriented letters from mirror reversals and can perform accurate cross-case matching of visually presented letters. It, therefore, appears that MS is able to access the abstract identity of visually presented letters despite her total inability to name them. This is a more precise form of letter processing impairment than that which has been reported in previous cases of pure alexic patients who are unable to name visually presented letters [Caplan, L.R., & HedleyWhite, T. (1974). Cueing and memory function in alexia without agraphia: a case report. Brain, 115, 251-262; Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1998). Varieties of pure alexia: the case of failure to access graphemic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 203-238; Sevush, S., & Heilman, K.M. (1984). A case of literal alexia. Brain & Language, 22, 92-108]. It suggests that representations of the graphemic identities of letters used in reading are either modality specific or else they are hemisphere specific [Saffran, E.M., & Coslett, H.B. (1998). Implicit vs. letter-by-letter reading in pure alexia: a tale of two systems. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 141-165]. Her letter processing impairment also appears to be different from that observed in a letter-by-letter reader [Perri, R., Bartolomeo, P., & Silveri, M.C. (1996). Letter dyslexia in a letter-by-letter reader. Brain & Language, 53,...

R. Mycroft; J. R. Hanley B; J. Kay A

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - February 26, 2003 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 26, 2003 February 26, 2003 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - February 26, 2003 February 26, 2003 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel Nevada related to Authorization Basis Noncompliances at the Nevada Test Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) review of the facts and circumstances related to certain nuclear safety noncompliances during 2002 at the Nevada Test Site. These noncompliances were identified in the process of conducting a limited Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) Program Review of Bechtel Nevada during November 14-15, 2002, by DOE's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE), in coordination with DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). These matters are being called to your attention through this Enforcement Letter since these noncompliances had not been

82

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 5, 2004 May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to Radiological Work Practices at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory April 19, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 19, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Employee Reprisal at the Savannah River Site April 1, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - April 1, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel Nevada related to Noncompliances with Occupational Radiation Protection and Quality Assurance Requirements at the Nevada Test Site March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Concrete

83

Enforcement Letter - BWXT Y-12  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13, 2004 13, 2004 Mr. Dennis R. Ruddy [ ] BWXT Y-12 P.O. Box 2009 MS 8001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8001 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Ruddy: On June 7, 2004, the Department of Energy (DOE)/Na tional Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) issued a Preliminary Notice of Violation (EA-2004-04), which included a quality improvement citation for continuing Safety Basis compliance issues at Y-12. BWXT Y-12 performance in this area had been the subject of discussion during both the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) onsite investigation, held during October 2003, and the subsequent enforcement conference held on January 22, 2004. On August 5, 2004, BWXT Y-12 submitted Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report number NTS-Y12- -BWXT-Y12NUCLEAR-2004-0007, titled Corrective Actions

84

Enforcement Letter - ELBWXT082902WS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

858 858 August 29, 2002 Dr. D. B. Shipp [ ] Bechtel BWXT Idaho, L.L.C. 2525 Freemont Avenue Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Subject: RWMC Enforcement Letter (NTS-ID--BBWI-RWMC-2002-0002) Dear Dr. Shipp: During July 16-17, 2002, personnel from the DOE Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) conducted an onsite investigation at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) of multiple events occurring during 2001-2002. The events all involved transuranic (TRU) waste characterization, handling, and shipping activities. The investigation included a detailed review of the March 2002 event in which an incorrect payload of TRU waste drums was shipped to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). OE also reviewed an additional seven similar events occurring in

85

Letter report to Pete Sanders, DOE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

for nuclear stimulation of low permeability gas reservoirs not conducive to production by conventional means. Project Rulison was the second experiment under the program....

86

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Isolation Division - October Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 October 3, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of four noncompliances with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule (10 CFR 830.120) and/or the Occupational Radiation Protection Rule (10 CFR 835) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997

87

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Isolation Division - October Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 October 3, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of four noncompliances with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule (10 CFR 830.120) and/or the Occupational Radiation Protection Rule (10 CFR 835) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October 3, 2000 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997

88

Enforcement Letter -Idaho-08/04/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 1998 4, 1998 Mr. John Denson [ ] Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company P.O.Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report NTS-ID--LITCOSITEW-1998-0001 Dear Mr. Denson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy=s (DOE) evaluation of the Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report for noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120, "Quality Assurance Requirements." The NTS report addresses a repetitive problem of maintaining the operability of radiation monitoring instrumentation and systems referenced in nuclear facilities authorization basis documents. The repetitive problem was identified by LMITCO on February 27, 1998, and reported to DOE on

89

Letters.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Kiran Patel Kiran Patel Department of Energy Washington , DC 20585 January 25, 20 10 AAAA World Import-Export, Inc. 7800 NW 29th Street Miami, FL 33122-1104 Dear Mr. Patel, The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the AAAA World Import-Export compact Ouorescent lamps (CFLs), models HS14BX3 and HS14CL3, will be di squalified from the ENERGY STAR Program, etfective today, January 25, 2010. The disqualification of these products is a result of the PEARL Cycle 9 testing indicating the products failed to meet ENERGY STAR criteria (as noted in the letter to your supplier, Xiamen Longstar, dated Novemher 2, 2009, from Richard Karney, ENERGY STAR Products Manager). When a product is disqualified from the ENERGY STAR program, all corresponding packaging and your supplier's product will be

90

Enforcement Letter - Ohio  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and timeliness of corrective actions. My office, in coordination with the DOE Ohio Field Office and the DOE Fernald Site Office staff, will continue to review performance...

91

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Enforcement » Enforcement Letters Services » Enforcement » Enforcement Letters Enforcement Letters Documents Available for Download November 27, 2013 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-04 Issued to National Renewable Energy Laboratory related to a drum rupture and flash event of the Thermochemical User Facility. July 30, 2013 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 Issued to Wastren Advantage, Inc. related to the Loss of Supplied Breathing Air in the Box Breakdown Area of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 29, 2013 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-01

92

Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu Diversity Action Letter from Secretary Chu In July 2011, the Office of Diversity Programs concluded a comprehensive review of DOE's workforce diversity and inclusion policies and programs. The findings from this analysis, which have been shared with DOE senior management, indicate that we can do more to create a culture that values diversity, which in turn will make the Department an employer of choice and enhance our mission effectiveness. Read more about these efforts here. This letter from Secretary Chu directs Associate Deputy Secretary Mel Williams to take action on the following issues: Dialogue and Feedback Recruitment and Hiring Retention, Development, and Promotions Commitment and Understanding Performance and Accountability

93

Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter Secretary Chu's Diversity Action Letter In July 2011, the Office of Diversity Programs concluded a comprehensive review of DOE's workforce diversity and inclusion policies and programs. The findings from this analysis, which have been shared with DOE senior management, indicate that we can do more to create a culture that values diversity, which in turn will make the Department an employer of choice and enhance our mission effectiveness. Read more about these efforts here. This letter from Secretary Chu directs Associate Deputy Secretary Mel Williams to take action on the following issues: Dialogue and Feedback Recruitment and Hiring Retention, Development, and Promotions Commitment and Understanding Performance and Accountability

94

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, 1997 April 23, 1997 Issued to the University of Chicago related to Radiological Worker Training and Qualification Deficiencies at the Argonne National Laboratory-East This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the failure to complete the required radiological worker training or retraining for approximately 30 percent of ANL-E's 797 radiological workers, was identified by ANL-E on December 17, 1996, and reported to DOE on December

95

Enforcement Letter-Sandia-07/21/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dr. Klaus Berkner [ ] University of California Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Report: NTS-SAN--LBL-NSD-1997-0002 Dear Dr. Berkner: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's (LBNL) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). The noncompliances involved the repeated failure of a laboratory researcher during 1996 - 1997 to adhere to LBNL's work authorization process and radiological work controls during research activities with a radioactive isotope, [ ]. On May 27, 1998, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) issued a letter to you,

96

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - February 24, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 24, February 24, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - February 24, 2000 February 24, 2000 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to Bioassay Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-East, February 24, 2000 This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the above referenced Noncompliance Tracking System(NTS) report describing bioassay program deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E). This report was submitted to DOE on December 23, 1999. Approximately thirteen months previous to this NTS report's submittal, DOE's Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-Enforcement) issued to all DOE and contractor Price-Anderson Amendments Act coordinators a

97

Does  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

98

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 20, 2010 January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Isotek Systems, LLC related to Quality Assurance Issues associated with the U233 Material Downblending and Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC related to a Failed Scram Event at the Neutron Radiography Reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory July 13, 2009 Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc., related to a Form Wood Timber Fire at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site

99

Office of Enforcement - Enforcement Letters  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(WEL-2013-02) Nuclear Safety Enforcement Letter issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program...

100

Enforcement Letter - Oakland-11/02/1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 1999 5, 1999 Dr. Robert W. Kuckuck [ ] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, L-005 Livermore, CA 94551-0808 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-OAK--LLNL-LLNL-1999-0004, NTS-OAK--LLNL- LLNL-1999-0006, NTS-OAK--LLNL-LLNL-1999-0007) Dear Dr. Kuckuck: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: 1. On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Enforcement Letter, LANL - October 9, 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 9, 2001 October 9, 2001 Enforcement Letter, LANL - October 9, 2001 October 9, 2001 Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Laboratory related to Quality Assurance Provisions at the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) report of noncompliances with quality assuranceprovisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility (LACEF) TA-18. These issues involved violations of theestablished LACEF Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) and were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff (NTS-ALO-LA-LANL-TA18-2000-0001) on February 25, 2000. These noncompliances were a part of the enforcement action issued by DOE to LANL in December

102

Transparency and Openness in the DOE Quandrennial Technology Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A letter written under the secretary of science, Steven Koonin, to the meeting participants discussing the DOE Quandrennial Technology Review.

103

Physical Review Letters.  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HIGHLIGHT of our most recent work to be published shortly in HIGHLIGHT of our most recent work to be published shortly in Physical Review Letters. We prepared a range of well characterized samples by the sol-gel method developed in our laboratory. By careful doping we controlled the divalent doping (in one set of samples) and the oxygen content (in the second set). We measured the temperature dependent magnetotransport behaviour of these complex oxides. The electronic structure of these well characterized samples was measured by electron energy-loss spectroscopy using the newly installed CM200/FEG microscopes. No discernible change in the Mn L3,2 edges were observed either as a function of doping or oxygen content. However, the O-K edge(1s->2p transitions) intensity, sensitive to the 2p hole density on oxygen sites, varied systematically

104

Enforcement Letter - KHLLC081204  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Ms. Nancy Tuor, [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC 10808 Highway 93 Unit B Golden, CO 80403-9200 Subject: Enforcement Letter for Water Treatment System Breach and Foam Fire Dear Ms. Tuor: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed the details and circumstances regarding two recent site events: the Building 771 unauthorized breach of the Water Treatment System in December 2003; and the February 2004 Building 991 foam fire. Both of these events represent significant breakdowns in your safety programs. Additionally, the general failure to adequately recognize hazards and implement effective controls observed in association with the Building 991 foam fire was an underlying deficiency in the 2003 Building 371 glovebox fire, for which this office has

105

Enforcement Letter - ELMOUND1222041  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Mr. John G. Lehew, [ ] CH2M Hill Mound, Inc 1 Mound Road P.O. Box 3030 Miamisburg, OH 45343-3030 Subject: Enforcement Letter-Spread of Contamination during Group 9 Waste Line Remediation Dear Mr. Lehew: My office has completed an evaluation of the facts and circumstances relating to the contamination event reported in the above subject. On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, several employees working in the soil contamina tion area (SCA) were unnecessarily contaminated with radioactive material as they traversed the SCA. The employees were assisting in the removal of a concrete encased underground radioactive material waste line. Documentation for the removal of prior sections of the waste line in potential release

106

Oregon Fire Marshall Letter  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

and E85 fuel ethanol fuel specification, dispensers, and E85 fuel ethanol fuel specification, dispensers, and dispenser labeling requirements This is a summary of Oregon's biofuel (biodiesel, biodiesel blends, and E85 fuel ethanol) regulations and dispenser labeling requirements. Please refer to OAR 603-027-0410 thru OAR 603-027-0490 for the complete regulation. In addition, we try to answer some common questions about dispensers permitted for use with biofuels. Due to the unique characteristics of these fuels, certain precautions must be taken. Some dispensers commonly used for gasoline and petroleum diesel are not to be used for biodiesel and E85. Biodiesel Identification of product. Biodiesel and biodiesel blends shall be identified by the capitol letter "B" followed by the numerical value representing the volume percentage of biodiesel fuel. For

107

Enforcement Letter ELWSRC041904  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19, 2004 19, 2004 Mr. Robert A. Pedde, [ ] Westinghouse Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Building [ ]/Room [ ] Aiken, SC 29808 Subject: Enforcement Letter Addressing Employee Reprisal (NTS-SR-WSRC-CLOSEGEN-2003-0001) Dear Mr. Pedde: On October 13, 2003, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) reported a noncompliance into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) involving an employee reprisal. The employee was terminated from WSRC after raising safety-related issues and procedural violations while positions in his area of expertise were available elsewhere at the site. The matter was investigated as an employee concern and the employee was reinstated. Our review of the Investigation Report dated October 1, 2003, indicates that the matter

108

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

109

Enforcement Letter - ELBN022603  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

is necessary. From a review of DOE's Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) database, OE noted three Bechtel Nevada reports over the past several months that...

110

Enforcement Letter - ELSPRU100404  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

discussion with Department of Energy (DOE) SPRU Project Office (SPO) personnel. Title 10 CFR 835, Occupational Radiation Protection, requires that external dose monitoring programs...

111

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter, 1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER (1939) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 On October 11, 1939, Alexander Sachs, Wall Street economist and longtime friend and unofficial advisor to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, met with the President to discuss a letter written by Albert Einstein the previous August (right). Einstein had written to inform Roosevelt that recent research on fission chain reactions utilizing uranium made it probable that large amounts of power could be produced by a chain reaction and that, by harnessing this power, the construction of "extremely powerful bombs" was conceivable. Einstein believed the German government was actively supporting research in this area and urged the United States government to do likewise. Sachs read from a cover letter he had prepared and briefed Roosevelt on the main points contained in Einstein's letter. Initially the President was noncommittal and expressed concern over locating the necessary funds, but at a second meeting over breakfast the next morning Roosevelt became convinced of the value of exploring atomic energy.

112

Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning 0 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Attached is Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1560 or at jason.taylor@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash_MO Acq Planning AL.pdf AL_ 2013-03 Acq Planning_MO.pdf More Documents & Publications Attachment FY2011-09(3) Policy Flash 2013-78 Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.3 Acquisition Planning in

113

Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July 13, 2009 Enforecement Letter, Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group INC, - July 13, 2009 July 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc., related to a Form Wood Timber Fire at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies associated with the January 24, 2009, fire event described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-SRSO--PSC-SWPF-2009-0001, Form Wood Timber Fire. The evaluation included a review of documents and discussions with you and members of your staff. Parsons Infrastructure &

114

Enforcement Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 30, 1999 July 30, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc - July 30, 1999 Issued to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. related to Radioactive Material Uptakes at the Y-12 National Security Complex April 15, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 Issued to Stony Brook University Hospital related to a Failed Interlock at the Radiation Therapy Facility at the Brookhaven National Laboratory February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to a Dropped Fuel Basket Assembly and Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-West August 4, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4,

115

1703 Process Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

703 Process Letter 1703 Process Letter A letter to project sponsors with pending applications that could not be considered for the Recovery Act-funded 1705 program due to...

116

McSlarrow Letter - March 9, 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04-000642 04-000642 The Deputy Secretary of Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 9, 2004 Mr. Todd Martin Chair, Hanford Advisory Board Dear Mr. Martin: Thank you for your January 15, 2004, letter to Under Secretary Card regarding the transition of closure sites from the Office of Environmental Management (EM) to other Department of Energy (DOE) organizations, specifically the Office of Legacy Management (LM). Public participation has been and continues to be an integral part of the DOE's cleanup efforts and the Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs) have contributed to improving public understanding of site operations. However, with the shift in mission from active cleanup to long-term surveillance and maintenance for closure sites, DOE will need to evaluate the appropriate level of public participation and the most

117

Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16, 2002 January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Brookhaven...

118

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IV. Effective Date. This Acquisition Letter is effective 30 days from the date of issue. V. Expiration Date. This Acquisition Letter remains in effect until canceled or...

119

Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Associates - January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Brookhaven Science Associates - January 16, 2002 January 16, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Brookhaven Science...

120

Enforcement Letter - Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 1997 7, 1997 Dr. Sigfried S. Hecker [ ] Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Noncompliance Report NTS-ALO-LA-LANL-LANL-1996-0004 Dear Dr. Hecker: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The noncompliances involved the failure of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to adequately implement the requirements contained in the governing quality assurance standard for stockpile evaluations in the areas of work controls and procedural compliance. As a result of these failures, an explosion and fire occurred at the [ ] on November 14, 1996.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

West - February 9, West - February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to a Dropped Fuel Basket Assembly and Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-West This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning two incidents occurring in June and August 1998 at Argonne National Laboratory - West's (ANLW) Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF): dropping a fuel basket assembly containing chopped fuel elements and repair of a manipulator seal tube. During November 2-3, 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear safety regulations may have

122

Enforcement Letter, Sandia National Laboratories - February 27, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Laboratories - February 27, National Laboratories - February 27, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Sandia National Laboratories - February 27, 1998 February 27, 1998 Issued to Sandia Corporation related to Work Control Deficiencies associated with operating Radiation Generating Devices at Sandia National Laboratories. This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of Sandia National Laboratories' (SNL's) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). The noncompliances, which involved operational and work control deficiencies related to the use of three radiation generating devices (RGDs), were identified on October 1, 1997, and reported to DOE on October 21, 1997, in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). Enforcement Letter, Sandia National Laboratories - February 27, 1998

123

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - April 1, 2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nevada - April 1, 2002 Nevada - April 1, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel Nevada - April 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel Nevada related to Noncompliances with Occupational Radiation Protection and Quality Assurance Requirements at the Nevada Test Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Bechtel Nevada's (BN) report of noncompliances with the occupational radiation protection and quality assurance provisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at the Nevada Test Site Reactor-Maintenance, Assembly and Disassembly (R-MAD) facility. The issues involved several failures to follow BN's established work controls and resulted in the uncontrolled breech of a posted radiological area boundary for a hot cell undergoing decommissioning. This was reported by your staff into the

124

Enforcement Letter; Quality Assurance Deficiencies Related to Weapon Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2005 2, 2005 Dr. Michael R. Anastasio Director Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, L-001 Livermore, CA 94550 Subject: Enforcement Letter - Quality Assurance Deficiencies Related to Weapon Activities Dear Dr. Anastasio: This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. During the dismantlement of a retired nuclear weapon, for which LLNL was the design

125

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-West - February 9, 1999 February 9, 1999 Enforcement Letter issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to a Dropped Fuel Basket Assembly and Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-West This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning two incidents occurring in June and August 1998 at Argonne National Laboratory - West's (ANLW) Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF): dropping a fuel basket assembly containing chopped fuel elements and repair of a manipulator seal tube. During November 2-3, 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine what, if any, noncompliances with applicable nuclear safety regulations may have

126

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 July 30, 2013 Issued to Wastren Advantage, Inc. related to the Loss of Supplied Breathing Air in the Box Breakdown Area of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding a loss of breathing air within the Box Breakdown Area (BBA) of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center (TWPC), which led to the expedited egress of two workers in supplied-air suits and one worker in a supplied-air hood. Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI) manages and operates the TWPC, located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, under a contract with DOE and is

127

Acquisition Letters | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Acquisition Letters Acquisition Letters Acquisition Letters The following is a list of active Department of Energy Acquisition Letters. These files are in PDF (Portable Document Files), MS Excel, or htm (hypertext markup) format. To read PDF files you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader which is available at no charge from Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/). If you have any questions concerning this list, please contact the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy on (202) 287-1330. NOTE: Copies of rescinded or cancelled AL's are available by calling the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 287-1330. ASSISTANCE ON USING THESE FILES: You may: (1) download these files to your local machine by clicking on the file name and choosing SAVE TO DISK, OR (2) you can configure Adobe Acrobat Reader to automatically open, which

128

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department 2 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Robert M. Myers, Director, Contractor Human Resources Policy Division (MA-612) at (202) 287-1584 or robert.myers@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash - DOE O 350 1.pdf Consolidated Model H-Clause 06-27-13.pdf Acquisition Letter - DOE O 350 1 6-27-13.pdf More Documents & Publications Chapter 30 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides GAO-04-539 Department of Energy: Certain Postretirement Benefits for Contractor Employees Are Unfunded and Program Oversight Could Be Improved

129

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Robert M. Myers, Director, Contractor Human Resources Policy Division (MA-612) at (202) 287-1584 or robert.myers@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash - DOE O 350 1.pdf Consolidated Model H-Clause 06-27-13.pdf Acquisition Letter - DOE O 350 1 6-27-13.pdf More Documents & Publications GAO-04-539 Department of Energy: Certain Postretirement Benefits for Contractor Employees Are Unfunded and Program Oversight Could Be Improved Chapter 30 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration

130

EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recommendations & Letters Recommendations & Letters EM SSAB Recommendations & Letters February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-03 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-02 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. February 27, 2013 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2013-01 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. July 26, 2012 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2012-01 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. September 19, 2011 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2011-03 Included recommendations, letters, and other related materials. September 19, 2011 EM SSAB Recommendations and Letters - 2011-02

131

Isolated trigger pulse generator  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A trigger pulse generation system capable of delivering a multiplicity of isolated 100 kV trigger pulses with picosecond simultaneity. 2 figs.

Aaland, K.

1980-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

132

Enforcement Letter - Argonne National Laboratory East  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 1996 6, 1996 Dr. William H. Hannum Argonne National Laboratory-East 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 Re: Noncompliance Report NTS-CH-AA-ANLE-ANLEER-1996-0001 Dear Dr. Hannum: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the unexpected, uncontrolled radiation exposure of an ANL-E temporary employee during January- August 1995 was identified by ANL-E on December 11, 1995, and reported to DOE on March 1, 1996, in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). The exposure to the ANL-E temporary employee resulted from radiation streaming from a storage vault which was used to store a high level

133

RFP Invitation Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Acquisition Services Management (ASM) Division Subcontracts, ASM-SUB P.O. Box 1663, Mail Stop P215 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 505-665-3814 / Fax 505-665-9022 E-mail: dknox@lanl.gov DATE: December 13, 2012 Subject: Request for Information (RFI) Request for Comments/Input on DRAFT Technical Requirements Document Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms Greetings: Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), a prime contractor to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), anticipates a joint procurement commencing in Government FY 2013 for two large supercomputing platforms to be known as the Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms. The Trinity and NERSC-8 Computing Platforms will support the following entities,

134

Submittal of Final Post-Closure Inspection Letter Report for Corrective Action Unit 112: Area 23 Hazardous Waste Trenches, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0, December 2007; DOE/NV--1103  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This letter serves as the post-closure monitoring letter report for the above Corrective Action Unit (CAU) for the period October 2006-September 2007. Quarterly inspections were conducted on December 20,2006; March 29,2007; June 13,2007; and September 27, 2007, to observe the condition of the gate, use restriction warning signs, monuments, fencing, trenches, soil covers, and monitoring well covers. The first inspection was conducted on December 20,2006. Signs, fencing, riprap, monuments, and monitoring well covers were in excellent condition. No cracking, erosion, or subsidence was observed on the covers. No issues or concerns were identified, and no corrective actions were recommended. The second inspection was conducted on March 29,2007. Signs, fencing, riprap, monuments, and monitoring well covers were in excellent condition. No cracking, erosion, or subsidence was observed on the covers. Vegetation that was observed to be growing in several locations on the cover was the only identified concern, for which removal was recommended. Vegetation was removed on May 24,2007. The third inspection was conducted on June 13,2007. Signs, fencing, riprap, monuments, and monitoring well covers were in excellent condition. No cracking, erosion, or subsidence was observed on the covers. No issues or concerns were identified, and no corrective actions were recommended. The fourth inspection was conducted on September 27,2007. Signs, fencing, riprap, monuments, and monitoring well covers were in excellent condition. No cracking, erosion, or subsidence was observed on the covers. No issues or concerns were identified, and no corrective actions were recommended. The post-closure inspection checklists for CAU 112 are attached. Photographs and field notes taken during site inspections are maintained in the project files.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2008-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

135

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Corporation - September Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements Implementation at the B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program

136

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho Technologies Company - Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company - August 4, 1998 August 4, 1998 Issued to Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company related to a Repetitive Problem with Instrument Operability at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report for noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120, "Quality Assurance Requirements." The NTS report addresses a repetitive problem of maintaining the operability of radiation monitoring instrumentation and systems referenced in nuclear facilities authorization

137

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

138

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

139

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August August 22, 1996 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22, 1996 August 22, 1996 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance involved the failure to complete required radiological worker retraining for 49 percent of LLNL's approximately 700 radiological workers. The training issue was initially identified on May 6, 1996, by LLNL during a routine review of the Chemistry and Materials Science deficiency

140

2003 CS 647b Report Transmittal Letter to Dick Cheney | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2003 CS 647b Report Transmittal Letter to Dick Cheney 2003 CS 647b Report Transmittal Letter to Dick Cheney 2003 CS 647b Report Transmittal Letter to Dick Cheney 2003 CS 647b Report Transmittal Letter to Dick Cheney This letter is in response to the annual Competitive Sourcing reporting requirement contained in section 647(b) of Division F of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, for FY 2004, P.L. 108-199. The enclosed report on the Department of Energy's (DOE) Competitive Sourcing program complies with the agency reporting elements outlined in P.L. 108-199 for submitting the annual Congressional Competitive Sourcing Activity Report. In summary, DOE's Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 Competitive Sourcing Activity Report includes cost, savings, Federal full-time equivalent (FTE), and other information on the Department's

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Microsoft Word - 2008 Letter Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Prepared for Prepared for Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Prepared by 490 L'Enfant Plaza North SW Washington, DC 20024 January 13, 2009 CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT This Page Intentionally Left Blank Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Assessment Letter Report i Executive Summary This Fiscal Year 2008 Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Letter Report presents an evaluation of the adequacy of the one mill per kilowatt-hour fee paid by commercial nuclear power generators for the permanent disposal of their spent nuclear fuel by the Government. This evaluation recommends no fee change.

142

Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 October 28, 2004 Issued to Diversified Metal Products, Inc. related to Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter addresses deficiencies associated with the fabrication of four transportainers delivered under contract to Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) in support of their Characterization and Repackaging Modular Unit development. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed your performance in delivering these transportainers and is concerned with the quality assurance aspects of your work activities in fabricating the transportainers. Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004

143

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Inc - March 25, 2004 National Inc - March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Concrete Work Issues at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford Site This letter addresses eleven instances that have occurred at the Waste Treatment Plant during a 14-month period form August 2002 through October 2003 in which concrete work was not performed to established procedures and standards. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these inspect concrete work prior to pour. In addition, OE is concerned with your failure to correct these known problems in a timely manner. It is our expectation that Bechtel National Inc. (BNI) has quality improvement programs in place to prevent recurrence

144

Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No.  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 - Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 - Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 - Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads. This is the cover letter to additional comments submitted by PMI after alerting the DOE to its belief that the Interpretive Rule should be subject

145

Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004 October 28, 2004 Issued to Diversified Metal Products, Inc. related to Transportainer Fabrication Deficiencies for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter addresses deficiencies associated with the fabrication of four transportainers delivered under contract to Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS) in support of their Characterization and Repackaging Modular Unit development. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed your performance in delivering these transportainers and is concerned with the quality assurance aspects of your work activities in fabricating the transportainers. Enforcement Letter, Diversified Metal Products, Inc - October 28, 2004

146

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - July 21, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July July 21, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - July 21, 1998 July 21, 1998 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Work Controls at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's (LBNL) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). The noncompliances involved the repeated failure of a laboratory researcher during 1996 - 1997 to adhere to LBNL's work authorization process and radiological work controls during research activities with a radioactive isotope, [ ]. On May 27, 1998, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) issued a letter to you, requesting information regarding this noncompliance

147

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Inc - March 25, 2004 National Inc - March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel National Inc - March 25, 2004 March 25, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Concrete Work Issues at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford Site This letter addresses eleven instances that have occurred at the Waste Treatment Plant during a 14-month period form August 2002 through October 2003 in which concrete work was not performed to established procedures and standards. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has reviewed these inspect concrete work prior to pour. In addition, OE is concerned with your failure to correct these known problems in a timely manner. It is our expectation that Bechtel National Inc. (BNI) has quality improvement programs in place to prevent recurrence

148

Enforcement Letter, BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 Enforcement Letter, BNFL Inc - July 10, 2003 July 10, 2003 Enforcement Letter issued to BNFL, Inc. related to potential violations of Quality Assurance Requirements at the East Tennessee Technology Park This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) review of the facts and circumstances related to several Price-Anderson noncompliances, which are documented in the following Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports NTS-ORO--BNFL-K33-2003-0001, "Weaknesses in BNFL's Issue Screening Process to Determine PAAA Noncompliance." This report documents that the BNFL PAAA Review Board failed to correctly identify and report the vast majority of reportable noncompliances NTS-ORO--BNFL-K33-2003-0002, "Weaknesses in the Management

149

Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC - March 26, 2010 March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, Inc. related to Installation and Inspection of Penetration Fire Seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with deficiencies in the installation and inspection of penetration fire seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building, located at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. DOE's investigation report, dated January 22, 2009, was provided to Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (Geiger) under

150

Enforcement Letter, Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Amer Industrial Technologies - April 13, 2010 April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Amer Industrial Technologies related to Weld Deficiencies at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, April 13, 2010 This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement's investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance deficiencies in safety significant drain pipe fabricated by Amer Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) as a supplier to Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. (Parsons) for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) construction project at the Department of Energy (DOE) Savanuah River Site. The contract between Parsons and AIT was

151

NSTec Enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2007 3, 2007 Dr. Stephen M. Younger President and General Manager National Security Technologies, LLC P.O. Box 98521 M/S NSF001 Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-8521 Dear Dr. Younger: The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report NTS- NSO--NST-NTS-2007-0002, Unplanned Radiological Exposure during Borehole Activity. Our evaluation included reviews of the associated critique and root cause analysis reports, and the related corrective action plan. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. 835, Occupational Radiation Protection, occurred when the National Security Technologies (NSTec) Borehole Management Project personnel were preparing to gain access to the wellhead at a post-shot crater in

152

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

153

Enforcement Letter, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Stony Brook University Hospital - April 15, 1999 April 15, 1999 Issued to Stony Brook University Hospital related to a Failed Interlock at the Radiation Therapy Facility at the Brookhaven National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning an event at the Radiation Therapy Facility (RTF) occurring in March 1998. In November 1998, DOE conducted an investigation to determine whether violations of DOE's nuclear safety rules associated with the event had occurred. The resulting Investigation Summary Report was transmitted to you on February 19, 1999. On March 11, 1999, you participated in an Enforcement Conference, along with Brookhaven

154

Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to Radiological Work Practices at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory The subject NTS report described multiple deficiencies identified through a DOE-RL assessment of contamination control and survey practices associated with fume hood work at the PNNL Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. The DOE-RL assessment was formally transmitted to PNNL on November 10, 2003. Specific deficiencies identified as part of the DOE assessment included multiple instances of workers failing to perform required contamination self-surveys, workers performing incomplete or cursory self-surveys, and workers failing to perform or

155

Enforcement Letter - Los Alamos National Laboratory, October 9, 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 9, 2001 October 9, 2001 Dr. John Browne [ ] Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Browne: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) report of noncompliances with quality assurance provisions of DOE's nuclear safety requirements occurring at Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility (LACEF) TA-18. These issues involved violations of the established LACEF Technical Safety Requirements (TSR) and were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff (NTS-ALO-LA-LANL-TA18-2000- 0001) on February 25, 2000. These noncompliances were a part of the enforcement action issued by DOE to LANL in December 2000 (EA 2000-13). Commitments in this NTS report include corrective action number 7 that stated "All

156

Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 5, 2004 May 5, 2004 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to Radiological Work Practices at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory The subject NTS report described multiple deficiencies identified through a DOE-RL assessment of contamination control and survey practices associated with fume hood work at the PNNL Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. The DOE-RL assessment was formally transmitted to PNNL on November 10, 2003. Specific deficiencies identified as part of the DOE assessment included multiple instances of workers failing to perform required contamination self-surveys, workers performing incomplete or cursory self-surveys, and workers failing to perform or

157

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/31/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1998 1, 1998 Mr. R. D. Hanson [ ] Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. P.O. Box 1000 MS/H5-20 Richland, WA 99352-1000 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Number NTS-RL--PHMC-PHMCGENL-1998-0003 Dear Mr. Hanson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the failure of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Incorporated (FDH) to effectively complete corrective actions for Enforcement Action 96-02 (EA 96-02), although FDH informed the DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) that such work had been completed. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(1)(iii) (Quality Improvement) mandates processes to detect and prevent quality problems be established and implemented. 10 CFR 830.120 (c)(2)(i) (Work Processes) requires that work be performed to established technical standards

158

November 7, 2006, Department letter reporting completion of Commitment 22B in the 2004-1 implementation plan, with the issuance of DOE Manual 450-4.1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

November 7,2006 November 7,2006 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004 Dear Mr. Chairman: As the responsible manager for the Department's 2004-1 implementation plan, I am notifying you that the Department has issued the attached Department Manual on Integrated Safety Management, completing commitment 22B in our 2004- 1 plan. The new Manual (DOE Manual 450-4.1, Integrated Su-rfety Management System Manual) identifies and institutionalizes DOE requirements and responsibilities regarding development and implementation of ISM systems within DOE. It also provides requirements and guidance for DOE and contractors to ensure development and implementation of an effective ISM system that is periodically reviewed and

159

letter to cities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Students: Students: Muscovy Mineral Spring Water is a corporation located in Moscow, Russia. Our product is pure, bottled water from the upland streams that are tributaries of the Volga River. It has met with great success in Europe, and our Board of Directors would like to expand our business into the United States of America. To achieve this goal, they have asked me to find a site in the U.S. to build a distribution center that will include a corporate office, warehouse, and shipping facility. These are the cities we are considering: Andover, Massachusetts Atlanta, Georgia Aurora, Colorado Duluth, Minnesota Ithaca, New York Little Rock, Arkansas Lubbock, Texas Milwaukee, Wisconsin Santa Fe, New Mexico Spokane, Washington My travel budget does not allow me to visit all of the cities we are considering. Therefore, I am asking for your help in choosing a location. I would like you to prepare a presentation based on research that will give MMSW a sense of the city's quality of life, especially for children. Some of our company executives will be moving to the U.S. with their families.

160

2013 General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning Summaries 2013 General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning Summaries GC-1APSReminderLetter-2013.pdf More...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Emerging Neurophysiological Specialization for Letter Strings  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In adult readers, printed words and other letter strings activate specialized visual functions within 200 msec, as evident from neurophysiological recordings of brain activity. These fast, specialized responses to letter strings are thought to develop ...

Urs Maurer; Silvia Brem; Kerstin Bucher; Daniel Brandeis

2005-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

162

Tenant data request: Sample letter | ENERGY STAR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

government resources Tenant data request: Sample letter Use this sample letter to request energy data from your tenants. This is helpful for instances where you want whole-building...

163

Enforcement Letter - Brookhaven-12/18/1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nicholas Samios Nicholas Samios [ ] Brookhaven National Laboratory Post Office Box 5000 Building 460 Upton, New York 11973-5000 Subject: Noncompliance Number NTS-CH-BH-BNL-PE-1996-0001 Dear Dr. Samios: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Brookhaven National Laboratory's (BNL) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection Rule). These potential noncompliances involved a number of instances of contractor or subcontractor failure to: (1) comply with area radiological warning signs, (2) use protective clothing and equipment, (3) maintain radiation exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), or (4) complete radiological worker training. On May 22, 1996, BNL reported

164

Resource Letter CP?1: Computational Physics  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Resource Letter provides a guide to the literature on the emerging field of computational physics. While traditional textbooks

Paul L. DeVries

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 June 7, 2000 Issued to Savannah River Ecology Laboratory related to Radioactive Material Control Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of radioactive material control deficiencies occurring at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) in September 1999. During the underlying event, SREL investigators transported radioactive environmental samples from the Ukraine to SREL and University of Georgia facilities without appropriate labeling, monitoring, and controls. These deficiencies were identified in September 1999; however, they were not formally reported to DOE via the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) until March 14, 2000. The Office

166

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEL-2011-01 NEL-2011-01 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-01 March 31, 2011 Enforcement Letter issued to LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC, regarding work control issues that resulted in the release of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance deficiencies resulting from recent decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities on or near uranium hexafluoride (UF6) and hydrofluoric acid lines at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Kentucky. On September 28, 2010, LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC (LATA Kentucky) reported to DOE noncompliances associated with these deficiencies in Noncompliance

167

Enforcement Letter-Oak Ridge-07/30/1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Robert Van Hook, Jr. Robert Van Hook, Jr. [ ] Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8001 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Van Hook: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the unexpected uptakes of a radioactive material, [ ], by employees at the Y-12 Plant subsequent to the June 8, 1998, restart of [ ] operations [ ]. These uptakes occurred at Y-12 Buildings 9212 and 9215 and involved 55 workers over a period of approximately five months. Radiation doses received by these workers ranged from 115 to 1124 millirem committed effective dose equivalent. During April 6-7, 1999, DOE conducted an investigation of these uptakes to determine what, if any, noncompliances with nuclear safety regulations may have occurred. A copy of the

168

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements Implementation at the B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program and reported to DOE on May 24, 1995.

169

Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WEL-2012-05 WEL-2012-05 Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 December 20, 2012 Enforcement Letter issued to Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, related to an Electrical Shock Near Miss Incident that occurred on February 27, 2012, at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated an electrical shock near miss incident that occurred on February 27, 2012, at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (Alliance) manages and operates NREL under a contract with the Department of Energy (DOE) and is subject to the provisions of DOE's Worker Safety and Health Program rule (10 C.F.R. Part 851). The event revealed weaknesses in Alliance's electrical hazard

170

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. - September 4,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Systems, Inc. - Energy Systems, Inc. - September 4, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. - September 4, 1997 September 4, 1997 Issued to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc., related to the Erroneous Transfer of Mixed Waste to a Landfill at the K-25 Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the erroneous transfer, during December 1996 through January 1997, of 165 55-gallon drums of mixed waste ash from K-25 to 'a Y-12 industrial landfill' for disposal. This incident was determined by DOE to be, in part, the result of several noncompliances with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 830, "Nuclear Safety Management" (10 CFR 830). Lockheed Martin Energy Systems' (LMES) procedures did not provide adequate

171

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Company - April 15, Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Savannah River Company - April 15, 1997 April 15, 1997 Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Potential Violations of Quality Assurance and Work Process Requirements at the Savannah River Site On February 11, 1997, the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) met with members of your staff and the DOE Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR) to review your progress in correcting the noncompliances identified in the subject Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports. A summary of our meeting and assessment of the information provided is enclosed with this letter. Your evaluation of the events and conditions leading to each of the occurrences, reported to EH-10 in the subject NTS reports, has identified

172

Enforcement Letter -Savannah River-06/07/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2000 7, 2000 Paul Bertsch, PhD [ ] Savannah River Ecology Laboratory Drawer E Aiken, SC 29802 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-SR--SREL-2000-0001) Dear Dr. Bertsch: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of radioactive material control deficiencies occurring at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) in September 1999. During the underlying event, SREL investigators transported radioactive environmental samples from the Ukraine to SREL and University of Georgia facilities without appropriate labeling, monitoring, and controls. These deficiencies were identified in September 1999; however, they were not formally reported to DOE via the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) until March 14, 2000. The Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-Enforcement) staff discussed the details of the

173

Enforcement Letter, Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Isoteck Systems, LLC - January 20, 2010 January 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Isotek Systems, LLC related to Quality Assurance Issues associated with the U233 Material Downblending and Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System Report NTS-ORO--ISOTEK-3019-2008-0001. Our evaluation included a review ofIsotek Systems, LLC (Isotek) causal factors analysis and corrective actions, and other requested documentation, as well as discussions with Isotek senior management and DOE Oak Ridge Office

174

Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - August 6, 1996 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 6, August 6, 1996 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - August 6, 1996 August 6, 1996 Issued to the University of Chicago related to an Unplanned and Uncontrolled Employee Radiation Exposure at the Argonne National Laboratory-East This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory-East's (ANL-E) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved the unexpected, uncontrolled radiation exposure of an ANL-E temporary employee during January- August 1995 was identified by ANL-E on December 11, 1995, and reported to DOE on March 1, 1996, in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). The exposure to the ANL-E temporary employee resulted from

175

Enforcement Letter-Savannah River-03/29/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Mr. Joseph J. Buggy, President [ ] Building 703-A Road 1 Aiken, SC 29802 Subject: Enforcement Letter (NTS-SR-WSRC-ESH-1999-0002) Dear Mr. Buggy: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the referenced Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report which describes the failure to properly retrain portions of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) nonradiological workforce with General Employee Radiological Training (GERT) and the failure to provide such training to all temporary visitors and individuals badged at other DOE locations. These deficiencies were identified by the WSRC Price-Anderson Coordinator in a 10 CFR 835 assessment. The deficiencies identified were noncompliances with the following requirements:

176

Enforcement Letter - Oak Ridge - 09/04/1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 1997 4, 1997 Dr. Robert Van Hook [ ] Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8002 Subject: Enforcement Letter Occurrence Report ORO--LMES-K25WASTMAN-1997-0001 Dear Dr. Van Hook: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the erroneous transfer, during December 1996 through January 1997, of 165 55-gallon drums of mixed waste ash from K-25 to [a Y-12 industrial landfill] for disposal. This incident was determined by DOE to be, in part, the result of several noncompliances with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 830, "Nuclear Safety Management" (10 CFR 830). Lockheed Martin Energy Systems' (LMES) procedures did not provide adequate administrative control for the identification of drums intended for the Y-12 landfill nor for

177

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6, 1995 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 6, 1995 July 6, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - July 6, 1995 July 6, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Radiological Work Control Deficiencies at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) investigation of an event that occurred between February 22-March 7, 1995, at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) at DOE's Hanford site. The event, which involved the cutting of a highly contaminated canyon exhaust air sampling probe as part of waste disposal activities without adequate management controls, resulted in your decision to temporarily curtail waste cutting activities. Based on your investigation of the event,

178

Microsoft Word - AcquisitionLetter95-14.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cooperation with the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cooperation with the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union The following Acquisition Letter 95-14 includes the terms and conditions (both intellectual property and non-intellectual property) that are to be used in subcontracts between DOE national laboratories and institutes in the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (NIS). There are two patent and data clauses - one for the Initiatives for Proliferation Program (IPP), formerly known as the Industrial Partnering Program, and one for all other DOE programs. AUTHORITY This Acquisition Letter (AL) is issued by the Procurement Executive pursuant to a delegation from the Secretary and under the authority of the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) subsections 901.301-70 and 901.301-71.

179

Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - June 7, 2000 June 7, 2000 Issued to Savannah River Ecology Laboratory related to Radioactive Material Control Deficiencies at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of radioactive material control deficiencies occurring at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) in September 1999. During the underlying event, SREL investigators transported radioactive environmental samples from the Ukraine to SREL and University of Georgia facilities without appropriate labeling, monitoring, and controls. These deficiencies were identified in September 1999; however, they were not formally reported to DOE via the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) until March 14, 2000. The Office

180

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 July 22, 1013 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding programmatic deficiencies identified in the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) software quality assurance (SQA) program. LLNS reported these deficiencies on January 16, 2013, in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS--LSO-LLNL-LLNL-2013-0001, LLNL Software Quality Assurance Program Does Not Meet DOE 0 414.1 D Standards and Procedures Requirements. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) issued a letter to the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

FINAL_2013_Stakeholder-Letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Send a letter to local officials/stakeholders about your participation in EPA's 2013 ENERGY STAR National Send a letter to local officials/stakeholders about your participation in EPA's 2013 ENERGY STAR National Building Competition by customizing the text below with your organization's information and whether you're also participating in the communications category of the competition. Dear [Name of official], [Name of buildings/space], owned/managed by [organization], has been selected to participate in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 2013 ENERGY STAR National Building Competition: Battle of the Buildings to help improve the energy efficiency of commercial buildings and protect the environment. In the spirit of popular weight-loss competitions, [name of buildings/space] will battle it out against thousands of other teams representing buildings and

182

Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 21, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1998 1, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 21, 1998 This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The potential noncompliances involved inadequate implementation of work controls, specifically failure of workers to perform required surveillance of the Fire Protection System. The failure to fully perform the required surveillance was identified by Safe Sites of Colorado (SSOC) on June 2, 1997, and reported to DOE in the subject Noncompliance Tracking System report on June 26, 1997. Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 21, 1998 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 20, 1998

183

letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 Report Number: IG-FS-99-01 Capital Regional Audit Office Date of Issue: February 25, 1999 Germantown, MD 20874 AUDIT OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL...................................... 1 REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL ON THE DEPARTMENT'S INTERNAL CONTROLS...............................................5

184

LETTERS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Fault mapping and palaeo- seismology at unconventional locations may be required to find out if places such as New Madrid and Charleston are ...

2010-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

185

LETTERS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Seismicity in the areas of past large earthquakes, including those in New Madrid, Missouri (18111812), Charlevoix, Quebec (1663), and Basel, ...

2010-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

186

Letter Responding to Requests for Information Made by Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Responding to Requests for Information Made by Department of Responding to Requests for Information Made by Department of Energy (DOE) Personnel About Restarting Potomac River After a Shutdown. Letter Responding to Requests for Information Made by Department of Energy (DOE) Personnel About Restarting Potomac River After a Shutdown. Docket No. EO-05-01: This letter responds to requests for information made by Department of Energy (DOE) personnel at our meeting about how to restart Potomac River as quickly as possible after a shutdown. Letter Responding to Requests for Information Made by Department of Energy (DOE) Personnel About Restarting Potomac River After a Shutdown. More Documents & Publications Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating

187

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Winchester Engineering and...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Raw Materials Development Laboratory Winchester, Massachusetts Summary Report 1954 - 1959; September 30, 1959 MA.03-3 - DOE Letter; DeLaney to Bolin; Elimination of the...

188

NERSC/DOE ASCR Requirements Workshop Reference Materials  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Advanced Scientific Computing Research January 5-6, 2011 Official DOE Invitation Workshop Invitation Letter...

189

NERSC/DOE BER Requirements Workshop Reference Materials  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directors Workshop Invitation Letter from DOE ASCR Program Manager Yukiko Sekine Past ESnet requirements workshop reports (provided for reference) ESnet Requirements Workshop...

190

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter to Roosevelt  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

EINSTEIN'S LETTER TO ROOSEVELT Albert Einstein (with Leo Szilard) to President Franklin Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 Resources > Library Below are photographs of both pages of the letter written by Albert Einstein, with the help of Leo Szilard, to President Franklin Roosevelt on August 2, 1939, warning Roosevelt of the dangers posed by nuclear energy. Click here for more background on the writing of this letter. The photographs of the pages themselves are courtesy the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum. First page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Second page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Click on a link below to return to Einstein's Letter, 1939 Albert Einstein Library Sources and notes for this page.

191

Enforcement Letter, Geiger Brothers Mechanical Contractors, INC...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inc. related to Installation and Inspection of Penetration Fire Seals at the DUF6 Conversion Building at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This letter refers to the...

192

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division - October...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division related to Quality Assurance and Occupational Radiation Protection Noncompliances at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant This letter refers...

193

Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies, LLC - May...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 21, 2007 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to Nuclear Safety Quality Assurance Requirements Deficiencies at the Nevada Test Site The...

194

Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technologies LLC,- November Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to an Unplanned Radiological Exposure during a Borehole Activity at the Nevada Test Site The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report NTS-NSO--NST-NTS-2007-0002, Unplanned Radiological Exposure during Borehole Activity. Our evaluation included reviews of the associated critique and root cause analysis reports, and the related corrective action plan. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. 835, Occupational Radiation Protection,occurred

195

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Issued to the University of California related to Potential Quality Assurance Rule Violations associated with an Explosion and Fire at the Los Alamos National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The noncompliances involved the failure of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to adequately implement the requirements contained in the governing quality assurance standard for stockpile evaluations in the areas of work controls and procedural compliance. As a result of these failures, an explosion and fire occurred at the [ ] on November 14, 1996.

196

Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 August, 20, 1999 Issued to International Isotopes Idaho, Inc. related to the Relocation of an Irradiated Pellet at the Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the relocation of an irradiated [isotope] pellet from within a hot cell to an adjoining, outside, charging port service area. This incident occurred on January 6, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is utilized by International

197

Enforcement Letter -Rocky Flats-08/02/2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2000 , 2000 Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 10808 Highway 93, Unit B Golden, CO 80403-8200 Subject: Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The potential noncompliances involved inadequate implementation of work controls, specifically failure to perform required combustible gas surveillances. The failure to fully perform the required surveillances was identified by the contractor during a comprehensive Kaiser-Hill (KHLL) Implementation Validation Review (IVR) team verifying implementation of the Basis of Interim Operation (BIO) for Buildings 776 and

198

Enforcement Letter, West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 Enforcement Letter, West Valley Nuclear Services - March 30, 1998 March 30, 1998 Issued to West Valley Nuclear Services related to Hazard Analysis, Design Review, Work Control Implementation, and a Contamination Event at the West Valley Demonstration Project This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of West Valley Nuclear Services Company's (WVNS) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance) and 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance, which involved inadequate hazards analysis, design review, and implementation of work controls during decontamination activities for a high-level waste tank mobilization pump, was identified by WVNS on

199

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 7, 1997 July 7, 1997 Issued to the University of California related to Potential Quality Assurance Rule Violations associated with an Explosion and Fire at the Los Alamos National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) evaluation of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). The noncompliances involved the failure of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to adequately implement the requirements contained in the governing quality assurance standard for stockpile evaluations in the areas of work controls and procedural compliance. As a result of these failures, an explosion and fire occurred at the [ ] on November 14, 1996.

200

Enforcement Letter - Rocky Flats -07/20/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 1998 , 1998 Mr. Robert G. Card [ ] Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site P.O. Box 464 Golden, CO 80402-0464 Subject: Enforcement Letter Noncompliance Reports NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-1997-0006 NTS-RFO--KHLL-371OPS-1997-0002 NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-1997-0010 NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-1998-0001 Dear Mr. Card: This letter refers to the Department of Energy=s (DOE) evaluation of noncompliances reported in four Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) entries, identified in the subject line above. The four NTS reports were submitted between September 24, 1997, and March 3, 1998. The reports identified potential noncompliances with requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) and 10 CFR 835 (Radiation Protection Rule). The Office of Enforcement and Investigation evaluated these NTS reports based on the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 Enforcement Letter, International Isotopes Idaho Inc - August 20, 1999 August, 20, 1999 Issued to International Isotopes Idaho, Inc. related to the Relocation of an Irradiated Pellet at the Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the relocation of an irradiated [isotope] pellet from within a hot cell to an adjoining, outside, charging port service area. This incident occurred on January 6, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is utilized by International

202

Letter, June 14, 2007, Preliminary Notice of Violation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 14, 2007 June 14, 2007 Dr. Robert Iotti President and Chief Executive Officer CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, L.L.C. 2525 Freemont Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-5104 Dear Dr. Iotti: This letter refers to the investigation of events at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project (ARP) by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement. The investigation summary report, Multiple Radiological Protection Program Deficiencies and Safety Culture Concerns, was provided to you in a letter dated February 20, 2007. An enforcement conference to discuss these findings was held on March 21, 2007, in Germantown, Maryland, with you and members of your staff. A summary of the conference is enclosed. Based on our evaluation of the evidence in this matter,

203

Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC related to a Failed Scram Event at the Neutron Radiography Reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies associated with the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) report NE-ID--BEA-NRAD-2008-0003, Shim Rod #2 Failure to SCRAM. Our evaluation included a review of documents and discussions with site personnel. Documents reviewed included the Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) Cause Analysis Report and Corrective Action Plan NE-ID-BEA-NRAD-2008-0003, Shim

204

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2012-04 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-04 2-04 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2012-04 November 5, 2012 Enforcement Letter issued to URS E&C Holdings Incorporated, related to Regulatory Issues Associated with a Series of Fall Protection Occurrences at the Separations Process Research Unit Disposition Project The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated a series of fall protection occurrences associated with URS E&C Holdings Incorporated's (URS) operations at the Department of Energy (DOE) Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) Disposition Project (DP) in Niskayuna, New York. These occurrences took place between November 2011 and July 2012, and included an event involving a URS employee working close to a second floor wall opening in building G2 at SPRU on July 9,

205

Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Security Technologies LLC,- November National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter, National Security Technologies LLC,- November 13, 2007 November 13, 2007 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to an Unplanned Radiological Exposure during a Borehole Activity at the Nevada Test Site The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report NTS-NSO--NST-NTS-2007-0002, Unplanned Radiological Exposure during Borehole Activity. Our evaluation included reviews of the associated critique and root cause analysis reports, and the related corrective action plan. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. 835, Occupational Radiation Protection,occurred

206

Triggering Top Quark Events  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Collisions at the LHC occur at a rate of up to 40 MHz, much larger than the 200 Hz storage capacity of the ATLAS experiment. The ATLAS trigger system has the challenging task of rejecting 99.9995 % of the events produced in collisions, while keeping those needed to achieve the physics goals of the experiment. This note evaluates the expected performance of the trigger system in top quark events by investigating the response of the trigger system to single objects such as a muon, an electron or a jet originating from top quark decays. In addition, the methodology needed to efficiently select top quark events in the online trigger system is discussed including methods to determine trigger efficiencies from data.

The ATLAS collaboration

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

Pre-Proposal Development WHITE PAPERS, PRE-PROPOSALS, LETTERS OF INTENT, OR LETTERS OF  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Pre-Proposal Development - 1 - WHITE PAPERS, PRE-PROPOSALS, LETTERS OF INTENT, OR LETTERS OF INQUIRY White papers, often used by defense agencies, and letters of intent and pre- proposals, typically unnecessary work for you and the sponsor. White Papers & Pre-Proposals Proposal preparation and review

Raina, Ramesh

208

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix G: Consultation Letters  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS APPENDIX G: CONSULTATION LETTERS Consultation Letters G-2 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-3 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LETTERS TO STATE AGENCIES AND RECOGNIZED NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS Consultation Letters G-4 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-5 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-6 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-7 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-8 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-9 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-10 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-11 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-12 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS

209

Roberson Letter - June 2, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2003 , 2003 Mr. Monte Wilson Chair Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Citizens Advisory Board 1055 Dear Mr. Wilson: This in response to your March 29, 2003, letter regarding the recommendations on transuranic (TRLD waste management suggested by the Office of Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Let me extend my appreciation for the time and effort put forth by the SSABs in developing a comprehensive set of recommendations to accelerate cleanup of TRU waste sites across the complex. We agree in principle with the recommendations. The recommendations support concepts presented in the National Transuranic Waste Management Plan, the Performance Management Plan for Transuranic Waste, and recent and ongoing TRU waste studies by the National Research Council. We are

210

The VERITAS Trigger System  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The VERITAS gamma-ray observatory, situated in southern Arizona, is an array of four 12m diameter imaging Cherenkov telescopes, each with a 499-pixel photomultiplier-tube camera. The instrument is designed to detect astrophysical gamma rays at energies above 100 GeV. At the low end of the VERITAS energy range, fluctuations in the night sky background light and single muons from cosmic-ray showers constitute significant backgrounds. VERITAS employs a three-tier trigger system to reduce the rate of these background events: an initial trigger which acts at the single pixel level, a pattern trigger which acts on the relative timing and pixel level, a pattern trigger which acts on the relative timing and distribution of pixel-level triggers within a single telescope camera, and an array-level trigger which requires simultaneous observation of an air-shower event in multiple telescopes. This final coincidence requirement significantly reduces the rate of background events, particularly those due to single muons. In this paper, the implementation of all levels of the VERITAS trigger system is discussed and their joint performance is characterized.

A. Weinstein; for the VERITAS Collaboration

2007-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

211

Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (T. Martin, J. Beirer, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) This letter reiterates the mission, objectives, and scope of the local Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs) associated with nine Department of Energy (DOE) environmental clean-up sites, and restates Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson's commitment to support the Boards activities. Roberson Letter - June 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs

212

ELECTRONIC TRIGGER CIRCUIT  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

An electronic trigger circuit is described of the type where an output pulse is obtained only after an input voltage has cqualed or exceeded a selected reference voltage. In general, the invention comprises a source of direct current reference voltage in series with an impedance and a diode rectifying element. An input pulse of preselected amplitude causes the diode to conduct and develop a signal across the impedance. The signal is delivered to an amplifier where an output pulse is produced and part of the output is fed back in a positive manner to the diode so that the amplifier produces a steep wave front trigger pulsc at the output. The trigger point of the described circuit is not subject to variation due to the aging, etc., of multi-electrode tabes, since the diode circuit essentially determines the trigger point.

Russell, J.A.G.

1958-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

Calorimetry Triggering in ATLAS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The ATLAS experiment is preparing for data taking at 14 TeV collision energy. A rich discovery physics program is being prepared in addition to the detailed study of Standard Model processes which will be produced in abundance. The ATLAS multi-level trigger system is designed to accept one event in 2/10{sup 5} to enable the selection of rare and unusual physics events. The ATLAS calorimeter system is a precise instrument, which includes liquid Argon electro-magnetic and hadronic components as well as a scintillator-tile hadronic calorimeter. All these components are used in the various levels of the trigger system. A wide physics coverage is ensured by inclusively selecting events with candidate electrons, photons, taus, jets or those with large missing transverse energy. The commissioning of the trigger system is being performed with cosmic ray events and by replaying simulated Monte Carlo events through the trigger and data acquisition system.

Igonkina, O.; /NIKHEF, Amsterdam; Achenbach, R.; /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys.; Adragna, P.; /Queen Mary, U. of London; Aharrouche, M.; /Mainz U., Inst. Phys.; Alexandre, G.; /Geneva U.; Andrei, V.; /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys.; Anduaga, X.; /La Plata U.; Aracena, I.; /SLAC; Backlund, S.; /CERN; Baines, J.; /Rutherford; Barnett, B.M.; /Rutherford; Bauss, B.; /Mainz U., Inst. Phys.; Bee, C.; /Marseille, CPPM; Behera, P.; /Iowa State U.; Bell, P.; /Manchester U.; Bendel, M.; /Mainz U., Inst. Phys.; Benslama, K.; /Regina U.; Berry, T.; /Royal Holloway, U. of London; Bogaerts, A.; /CERN; Bohm, C.; /Stockholm U.; Bold, T.; /UC, Irvine /AGH-UST, Cracow /Birmingham U. /Barcelona, IFAE /CERN /Birmingham U. /Rutherford /Montreal U. /Santa Maria U., Valparaiso /DESY /DESY, Zeuthen /Geneva U. /City Coll., N.Y. /Barcelona, IFAE /CERN /Birmingham U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Birmingham U. /Lisbon, LIFEP /Rio de Janeiro Federal U. /City Coll., N.Y. /Birmingham U. /Copenhagen U. /Copenhagen U. /Brookhaven /Rutherford /Royal Holloway, U. of London /Pennsylvania U. /Montreal U. /SLAC /CERN /Michigan State U. /Chile U., Catolica /City Coll., N.Y. /Oxford U. /La Plata U. /McGill U. /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Hamburg U. /DESY /DESY, Zeuthen /Geneva U. /Queen Mary, U. of London /CERN /Rutherford /Rio de Janeiro Federal U. /Birmingham U. /Montreal U. /CERN /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Liverpool U. /Royal Holloway, U. of London /Pennsylvania U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Geneva U. /Birmingham U. /NIKHEF, Amsterdam /Rutherford /Royal Holloway, U. of London /Rutherford /Royal Holloway, U. of London /AGH-UST, Cracow /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Birmingham U. /Hamburg U. /DESY /DESY, Zeuthen /Geneva U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Michigan State U. /Stockholm U. /Stockholm U. /Birmingham U. /CERN /Montreal U. /Stockholm U. /Arizona U. /Regina U. /Regina U. /Rutherford /NIKHEF, Amsterdam /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /DESY /DESY, Zeuthen /City Coll., N.Y. /University Coll. London /Humboldt U., Berlin /Queen Mary, U. of London /Argonne /LPSC, Grenoble /Arizona U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Birmingham U. /Antonio Narino U. /Hamburg U. /DESY /DESY, Zeuthen /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Birmingham U. /Chile U., Catolica /Indiana U. /Manchester U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Rutherford /City Coll., N.Y. /Stockholm U. /La Plata U. /Antonio Narino U. /Queen Mary, U. of London /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Antonio Narino U. /Pavia U. /City Coll., N.Y. /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Pennsylvania U. /Barcelona, IFAE /Barcelona, IFAE /Chile U., Catolica /Genoa U. /INFN, Genoa /Rutherford /Barcelona, IFAE /Nevis Labs, Columbia U. /CERN /Antonio Narino U. /McGill U. /Rutherford /Santa Maria U., Valparaiso /Rutherford /Chile U., Catolica /Brookhaven /Oregon U. /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Barcelona, IFAE /McGill U. /Antonio Narino U. /Antonio Narino U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Sydney U. /Rutherford /McGill U. /McGill U. /Pavia U. /Genoa U. /INFN, Genoa /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Barcelona, IFAE /SLAC /Stockholm U. /Moscow State U. /Stockholm U. /Birmingham U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /DESY /DESY, Zeuthen /Birmingham U. /Geneva U. /Oregon U. /Barcelona, IFAE /University Coll. London /Royal Holloway, U. of London /Birmingham U. /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /Birmingham U. /Birmingham U. /Oregon U. /La Plata U. /Geneva U. /Chile U., Catolica /McGill U. /Pavia U. /Barcelona, IFAE /Regina U. /Birmingham U. /Birmingham U. /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /Oxford U. /CERN /Kirchhoff Inst. Phys. /UC, Irvine /UC, Irvine /Wisconsin U., Madison /Rutherford /Mainz U., Inst. Phys. /CERN /Geneva U. /Copenhagen U. /City Coll., N.Y. /Wisconsin U., Madison /Rio de Janeiro Federal U. /Wisconsin U., Madison /Stockholm U. /University Coll. London

2011-12-08T23:59:59.000Z

214

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02 July 30, 2013 Issued to Wastren Advantage, Inc. related to the Loss of Supplied Breathing Air in the Box Breakdown Area of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding a loss of breathing air within the Box Breakdown Area (BBA) of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center (TWPC), which led to the expedited egress of two workers in supplied-air suits and one worker in a supplied-air hood. Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI) manages and operates the TWPC, located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, under a contract with DOE and is subject to the provisions of DOE's Nuclear Safety Management rule

215

October 25, 2001, DOE letter reporting completion of commitment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The following commitment is proposed for closure: 229 Complete dissolution of RFETS scrub alloy at SRS. - September 2001 Dissolution of the scrub alloy was completed on September...

216

Letter of Appreciation from DOE to Argonne Employees for their...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for their services and expertise during the nuclear situation at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan. Sal Golub, deputy assistant secretary for Nuclear Reactor...

217

December 28, 2000, DOE letter regarding the removal of spent...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office (RL) associated with removing spent nuclear fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site as part of its Recommendation 94-1, which was recently combined into...

218

September 19, 2001, DOE letter providing additional information...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of plutonium at the PFP. These 108 containers contain a total of approximately three kilograms of plutonium and approximately three kilograms of uranium. These lean solutions...

219

January 19, 2001, DOE letter enclosing Revision 1 of Implementation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

STABILIZATION ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 5.1 Inventory Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

220

September 27, 2000, DOE letter enclosing closure packages for...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Other factors such as process efficiencies (including number of items in a batch), packaging configuration and worker risk also will be considered in determining individual...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

March 6, 2001, DOE letter reporting completion of two commitments...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Washington, DC 20585 March 6, 2001 The Honorable John T. Conway Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C....

222

Microsoft Word - DOE Comment Letter.FINAL.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

/ 6 / 6 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 312 Washington, DC 20001-2075 Telephone: 202-662-9535 TDD: 202-662-9538 Fax: 202-662-9634 January 8, 2006 Anthony J. Como SEA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Comments on Department of Energy's Special Environmental Analysis Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA Dear Mr. Como: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy's November 2006 Special Environmental Analysis

223

Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

exposed to energized electrical energy sufficient to cause serious injury or electrocution. Enforcement Letter,WEL-2012-05 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter,...

224

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc More Documents & Publications ACQUISITION LETTER DEAR Part 933 OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Chapter 33 - Protests, Disputes and Appeals...

225

Microsoft Word - AL 2010-07 Acquistion Letters Remaining in Effect May 2010 revision 1 June 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

No. AL 2010-07 Rev. 1 No. AL 2010-07 Rev. 1 Acquisition Regulation Date 06/01/2010 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACQUISITION LETTERS REMAINING IN EFFECT NUMBER DATE SUBJECT 93-4 04/07/1993 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/1994 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 95-06 06/28/1995 Personal Property Letter System 2000-09 11/11/2000 Source Selection Authority 2005-11 07/15/2005 Home Office Expenses for Management and

226

Cygnus Trigger System  

SciTech Connect

The Cygnus Dual Beam Radiographic Facility consists of two radiographic sources (Cygnus 1, Cygnus 2) each with a dose rating of 4 rads at 1 m, and a 1-mm diameter spot size. The electrical specifications are: 2.25 MV, 60 kA, 60 ns. This facility is located in an underground environment at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). These sources were developed as a primary diagnostic for subcritical tests, which are single-shot, high-value events. In such an application there is an emphasis on reliability and reproducibility. A robust, low-jitter trigger system is a key element for meeting these goals. The trigger system was developed with both commercial and project-specific equipment. In addition to the traditional functions of a trigger system there are novel features added to protect the investment of a high-value shot. Details of the trigger system, including elements designed specifically for a subcritical test application, will be presented. The individual electronic components have their nominal throughput, and when assembled have a system throughput with a measured range of jitter. The shot-to-shot jitter will be assessed both individually and in combination. Trigger reliability and reproducibility results will be presented for a substantial number of shots executed at the NTS.

G. Corrow, M. Hansen, D. Henderson, C. Mitton

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Unraveling life four letters at a time  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Unraveling life four letters at a time Unraveling life four letters at a time 1663 Los Alamos science and technology magazine Latest Issue:November 2013 All Issues » submit Unraveling life four letters at a time Major advances in sequencing since the official end of the Human Genome Project are fueling a revolution in genomics research. November 25, 2013 Unraveling life four letters at a time Reading the genetic code of life keeps getting faster and cheaper, bringing more and more new discoveries within reach. The genomics revolution that came after the Human Genome Project The Human Genome Project officially ended in 2003, but the 10 years since have seen dramatic improvements in genomics technology and discovery. New, rapid sequencing machines provide high throughput conversion of genetic material (DNA or RNA) into data to be arranged into its proper order by a

228

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

229

Three Letters to an Architect Dissolving  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Three Letters to an Architect Dissolving Douglas Dardendeceive yourself. To be an architect is to lay d o w n y o uheavy earth. Give up, architect: n o m a n , and less the

Darden, Douglas

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

LANL Enforcement Letter - 7/7/2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2003 Vice Admiral George P. Nanos Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Los Alamos National Laboratory Enforcement Letter Dear Admiral...

231

NNSA Policy Letter: NAP-4B  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Policy Letter: NAP-4B Date: June 30,2008 TITLE: Corporate Performance Evaluation Process for M&O Contractors I. OBJECTIVE: To establish and implement a uniform, corporate process...

232

Commissioning ATLAS Trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will face the challenge of efficiently selecting interesting candidate events in $pp$ collisions at 14 TeV centre-of-mass energy, whilst rejecting the enormous number of background events. Therefore it is equipped with a three level trigger system. The first level is is hardware based and uses coarse granularity calorimeter information and fast readout muon chambers. The second and third level triggers, which are software based, will need to reduce the first level trigger output rate of ~ 75 kHz to ~ 200 Hz written out to mass storage. The progress in commissioning of this system will be reviewed in this paper.

Tomasz Bold; for Atlas Tdaq

2008-10-20T23:59:59.000Z

233

Microfabricated triggered vacuum switch  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A microfabricated vacuum switch is disclosed which includes a substrate upon which an anode, cathode and trigger electrode are located. A cover is sealed over the substrate under vacuum to complete the vacuum switch. In some embodiments of the present invention, a metal cover can be used in place of the trigger electrode on the substrate. Materials used for the vacuum switch are compatible with high vacuum, relatively high temperature processing. These materials include molybdenum, niobium, copper, tungsten, aluminum and alloys thereof for the anode and cathode. Carbon in the form of graphitic carbon, a diamond-like material, or carbon nanotubes can be used in the trigger electrode. Channels can be optionally formed in the substrate to mitigate against surface breakdown.

Roesler, Alexander W. (Tijeras, NM); Schare, Joshua M. (Albuquerque, NM); Bunch, Kyle (Albuquerque, NM)

2010-05-11T23:59:59.000Z

234

The ATLAS jet trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS jet trigger system has a 3-level structure, and was designed based on the concept of Regions Of Interest, where only regions of the detector around interesting Level-1 objects are reconstructed at the higher levels. This philosophy has changed during 2011, and there now exists the possibility to unpacking the full calorimeter at Event Filter. In 2012, full calorimeter unpacking is also available at Level-2, in addition jet energies are now calibrated to jet energy scale, and cleaning cuts are applied to reduce rate spikes. This paper presents the performance of the jet trigger in 2011 and an overview of the new features available for 2012.

Tamsett, M; The ATLAS collaboration

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Audit Letter Report: INS-L-07-0 1 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

INS-L-07-0 1 Audit Letter Report: INS-L-07-0 1 October 18, 2006 Drug Testing For Security Positions at DOE's Portsmouth and PaducahSites" (S051S036) In 1993, both plants were...

236

Triggered plasma opening switch  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A triggerable opening switch for a very high voltage and current pulse includes a transmission line extending from a source to a load and having an intermediate switch section including a plasma for conducting electrons between transmission line conductors and a magnetic field for breaking the plasma conduction path and magnetically insulating the electrons when it is desired to open the switch.

Mendel, Clifford W. (Albuquerque, NM)

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Triggered plasma opening switch  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A triggerable opening switch for a very high voltage and current pulse includes a transmission line extending from a source to a load and having an intermediate switch section including a plasma for conducting electrons between transmission line conductors and a magnetic field for breaking the plasma conduction path and magnetically insulating the electrons when it is desired to open the switch.

Mendel, C.W.

1986-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

238

Enforcement Letter-Oakland-05/28/1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1997 1997 Dr. Charles V. Shank [ ] University of California Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 Subject: Noncompliance Report NTS-SAN-LBL-EHS-1997-0001 Dear Dr. Shank: This letter addresses the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's (LBNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835. This potential noncompliance involved the dismissal of the site As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Committee in January 1996. This action was contrary to the commitments made in the Lawrence Berkeley Radiation Protection Program (RPP). The matter was initially reported to DOE in an anonymous complaint to the Oakland Operations Office and was placed into the Noncompliance Tracking System by LBNL on March 24,1997.

239

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 17, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 17, January 17, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 17, 1997 January 17, 1997 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Los Alamos National Laboratory On December 4, 1996, the referenced potential noncompliance was reported to DOE by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The report describes an assessment conducted by LANL after a determination was made that at least nine employees at Building TA-55 had not received radiological worker training in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835. The issue was initially raised by DOE/LAAO and the facility Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) coordinator conducted a preliminary review. Based on that assessment, the coordinator decided to report the

240

Enforcement Letter-Richland-07/06/1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 1995 6, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL--WHC-PUREX-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: Mr. Ronald J. Bliss [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-04 Richland, WA 99350 Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility Gentlemen: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) investigation of an event that occurred between February 22-March 7, 1995, at the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) at DOE's Hanford site. The event, which involved the cutting of a highly contaminated canyon exhaust air sampling probe as part of waste disposal activities without adequate management controls, resulted in your decision to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Enforcement Letter-Richland-09/22/1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 1995 2, 1995 NTS No. NTS-RL-WHC-BPLANT-1995-0001 Westinghouse Hanford Corporation ATTN: D.J. Swaim [ ] P.O. Box 1970 MSIN: B3-51 Richland, WA 99352 Dear Sirs: Subject: Noncompliance with 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program and reported to DOE on May 24, 1995.

242

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 17, 1997 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 17, January 17, 1997 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 17, 1997 January 17, 1997 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Los Alamos National Laboratory On December 4, 1996, the referenced potential noncompliance was reported to DOE by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The report describes an assessment conducted by LANL after a determination was made that at least nine employees at Building TA-55 had not received radiological worker training in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835. The issue was initially raised by DOE/LAAO and the facility Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) coordinator conducted a preliminary review. Based on that assessment, the coordinator decided to report the

243

Rispoli Letter - June 21, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Kerry Trammell, Chair Kerry Trammell, Chair Site Specific Advisory Board DOE Information Center 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 On behalf of the entire Department of Energy (DOE) and particularly the Office of Environmental Management (EM), I extend my sincere congratulations to the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (OR SSAB) and its Stewardship Committee on being awarded the Environmental Protection Agency's 2006 Citizen's Excellence in Community Involvement Award. This is a major achievement on a national scale. The Environmental Protection Agency's recognition of your work validates what we in EM have known for years - the OR SSAB and its committees are committed to much more than providing advice and recommendations on the EM program. OR SSAB is

244

DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

245

DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

μm in aerodynamic μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

246

Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1560 or at jason.taylor@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash_Nondisplacement.pdf SIGNED_classdeviation970.5244-1.pdf AL nondisplacement of qualified workers.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2013-79 Professional and Consultant service cost (FAR 31.205-33) Policy Flash 2013-41 Contracts Periods of Performance Exceeding 5 Years Policy Flashes FY 2013

247

Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 20, 1998 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 1998 0, 1998 Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 20, 1998 July 20, 1998 Issued to Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC related to Recurring Weaknesses in Implementing Quality Assurance Rule Requirements at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of noncompliances reported in four Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) entries, identified in the subject line above. The four NTS reports were submitted between September 24, 1997, and March 3, 1998. The reports identified potential noncompliances with requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule) and 10 CFR 835 (Radiation Protection Rule). Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 20, 1998 More Documents & Publications

248

Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. - April 24, 2001 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. - April 24, 2001 CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. - April 24, 2001 Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. - April 24, 2001 April 24, 2001 Enforcement Letter issued to CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., related to Nuclear Safety Management at the Hanford Site Tank Farms This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE), regarding potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830, "Nuclear Safety Management," occurring at the Hanford Tank Farms. The investigation reviewed three issues that were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. Two of the NTS reports involve the failure to perform the Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) for [ ] gas monitoring. The initial potential noncompliance occurred in January 2000, in which a Zip Cord was installed

249

Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. - April 24, 2001 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inc. - April 24, 2001 Inc. - April 24, 2001 Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. - April 24, 2001 April 24, 2001 Enforcement Letter issued to CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., related to Nuclear Safety Management at the Hanford Site Tank Farms This letter refers to a recent investigation by the Department of Energy (DOE), regarding potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830, "Nuclear Safety Management," occurring at the Hanford Tank Farms. The investigation reviewed three issues that were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. Two of the NTS reports involve the failure to perform the Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) for [ ] gas monitoring. The initial potential noncompliance occurred in January 2000, in which a Zip Cord was installed

250

Roberson Letter - December 22, 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2003 22, 2003 I would like to thank all parties involved for the progress we have made to date in implementing a direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). I want to assure you that the Department of Energy views the SSABs as essential to accomplishing our cleanup mission. My objective is to insure that the SSABs' independence is maintained in their relationship with the Department. Preserving the integrity of the SSABs as well as maintaining the credibility of their work product is paramount. The EMSSAB Charter provisions require the Department of Energy to provide the resources sufficient to conduct EMSSAB business. That support, as I have stated before, remains undiminished, and the Department is committed to

251

Letter and Notices.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Zoe Industries, Inc. Zoe Industries, Inc. ) ) ) ) Case Number: 20JO-CW-1405 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CIVIL PENAL TV Date issued: January 25,2010 To: David Dewey Zoe Industries, Inc. 9035 E. Pima Center Parkway, Suite #5 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 Number of alleged violations: 30 Maximum possible assessment: $1 J 0 per day per violation prior to January 13, 2010. $200 per day per violation beginning January 13,2010. Note: Failure to submit a certification report is a separate violation for each basic model. Proposed civil penalty: $876,080 The Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) alleges that Zoe Industries, Inc. (Manufacturer) violated certain provisions of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.c. 6201, el seq., andlor 10 C.F.R. Part 430.

252

Letter and Notices.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EZ-FLO International, Inc. EZ-FLO International, Inc. ) ) ) ) Case Number: 2010-CW-1401 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY Date issued: January 25, 2010 To: Saleem Lahlouh EZ-FLO International, Inc. 2750 E. Mission Boulevard Ontario, California 91761 Number of alleged violations: 30 Maximum possible assessment: $110 per day per violation prior to January 13 , 2010. $200 per day per violation beginning January 13,2010. Note: Failure [0 submit a certification report is a separate violation for each basic model. Proposed civil penalty: $876,080 The Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) alleges that EZ-FLO International (Manufacturer) violated certain provisions of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. 6201, el seq., and/or 10 C.F.R. Part 430.

253

Letter and Notices.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Altmans Products LLC Altmans Products LLC ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: 2010-CW-1402 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY Date issued: January 25, 2010 To: Jorge Barbara Altmans Products LLC 10459 Jefferson Boulevard Culver City, California 90232 Number of alleged violations: 22 Maximum possible assessment: $110 per day per violation prior to January 13, 20 I o. $200 per day per violation beginning January 13, 20 I O. Note: Failure (0 submit a certification report is a separate violation for each basic model. Proposed civil penalty: $642,480 The Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) alleges that Altmans Products LLC (Manufacturer) violated certain provisions of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U .S.c. 620 I, el seq., and/or 10 C.F.R. Part 430.

254

Enforcement Letter, Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc - May 4, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc - May 4, 2000 Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc - May 4, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc - May 4, 2000 May 4, 2000 Issued to Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc., related to Deficiencies in the Unresolved Safety Question Process at the Miamisburg Environmental Management Project This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc. (BWO) reports of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance). This potential noncompliance involved deficiencies in the BWO unreviewed safety question (USQ) process as identified by a 1998 DOE-Miamisburg Environmental Management Project (MEMP) assessment. The DOE assessment identified ineffective criteria for the selection, training and qualification of

255

Sept 2001 Rough Draft OFFM Policy Letter 02-1.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S. Department of Energy S. Department of Energy Office of Science THIS IS A RECOVERY ACT ANNOUNCEMENT RECOVERY ACT (ARRA) - EARLY CAREER RESEARCH PROGRAM Funding Opportunity Number: DE-PS02-09ER09-26 Announcement Type: Initial CFDA Number: 81.049 ISSUE DATE: 07/02/2009 Letter of Intent: 08/03/2009, 4:30 PM Eastern Time A Letter of Intent is encouraged Application Due Date: 09/01/2009, 8:00 PM Eastern Time EFFECTIVE MARCH 12, 2009 DO NOT USE GRANTS.GOV TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS. USE DOE'S e-Center (IIPS) (https://e-center.doe.gov/). Instructions on the Use of IIPS are located at http://www.sc.doe.gov/grants/IIPS-Instructions.html . Applicants are required to use the compatible version of Adobe Reader software to complete a

256

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

257

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting

258

Microsoft Word - Kucman Intervention Letter Sept 17 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17, 2013 17, 2013 Electronic Filing Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov RE: Petition by Mr. Taras Kucman to intervene in the matter of Northern Pass Transmission LLC's Amended Presidential Permit Application (PP-371) Submitted July 1, 2013. Dear Mr. Lawrence: Please find enclosed my petition to intervene in this matter. I hereby certify that I served copies of this letter and the enclosed petition by Overnight Federal Express today to each of the following: Anne Bartosewicz Mary Anne Sullivan Northeast Utilities Hogan Lovells, LLP 107 Selden Street 555 13 th Street, NW Berlin, CT 07037 Washington, DC 20004

259

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-03 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2011-03 October 24, 2011 Issued to EnergySolutions, LLC related to a Radiological Contamination Event at the Separations Process Research Unit at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight conducted an evaluation of the radiological contamination event at the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) Building H2 Tank Farm Weather Enclosure located at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in Niskayuna, New York. On February 17, 2011, URS Washington Group International, Inc. (URS), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prime contractor, reported an assessment of this event in the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System report EM---WGI-G2H2-2011-0001, Higher Than Expected Contamination Levels Inside H2 Tank Farm Weather Enclosure.

260

Letter, September 21, 1998, Preliminary Notice of Violation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 1998 1, 1998 Mr. Richard B. Wilkerson President and General Manager MK-Ferguson of Oak Ridge Company P.O. Box 2011 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 EA 98-08 Subject: Preliminary Notice of Violation NTS-ORO--MKFO-X 1 OCONSTRM-1997 -0001 Dear Mr. Wilkerson: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances associated with deficiencies in the administration of the MK-Ferguson of Oak Ridge Company (MK-F) bioassay program, during the time period between 1996- 1997 when it was a subcontractor to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems (LMES), the integrating contractor at the Oak Ridge site. The deficiencies in the bioassay program resulted in the failure, on multiple occasions over a period of close to two years, to identify significant intakes of radioactive material by two workers. The exposures

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WEL-2013-01 WEL-2013-01 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-01 May 29, 2013 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC, related to Worker Beryllium Exposure during Machining at the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Beryllium Technology Facility The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated the circumstances surrounding a work evolution performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Technical Area 3, Building 141, Beryllium Technology Facility (BTF), on July 11, 2012. The work evolution resulted in a worker exposure to beryllium in excess of the Department of Energy (DOE) action level of 0.2 micrograms per cubic meter for an 8-hour, time-weighted average. Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), which manages and operates LANL under a contract with the National

262

Enforcement Letter-Oakland-08/22/1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dr. Robert W. Kuckuck Dr. Robert W. Kuckuck [ ] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 8078, L-001 Livermore, CA 94551 Re: Noncompliance Report NTS-SAN--LLNL-LLNL-1996-0002 Dear Dr. Kuckuck: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance involved the failure to complete required radiological worker retraining for 49 percent of LLNL's approximately 700 radiological workers. The training issue was initially identified on May 6, 1996, by LLNL during a routine review of the Chemistry and Materials Science deficiency tracking system when the administrative supervisor discovered that four individuals were not current in

263

Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

F 1 F 1 3 2 5 8 (8-89) EFCi (07-90) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE. May 6, 2009 =PLY TO ATIT OF. IG-40 SUBJECT Letter Report on "Selected Aspects of the Department of Energy's Activities Involving the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act," INS-L-09-05 (S09IS0 14) TO. Director, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence This report provides the results of our review of selected aspects of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act activities of the Department of Energy's Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence. BACKGROUND In conjunction with the Department of Energy's (DOE'S) role as part of the U.S. intelligence community, the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence (IN) provides technical intelligence analyses on all aspects of foreign nuclear weapons, nuclear

264

Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Letter Report on Selected Aspects of the Department of Energy's Activities Involving the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

265

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- June 2, 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005

266

Enforcement Letter issued to BWXT Y-12- October 13, 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to BWXT Y-12 related to Safety Basis Compliance Deficiencies at the Y-12 National Security Complex

267

Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Policy Flash 2013-51 311 Notice Aquisition Letter 2013-05 Financial Assistance Letter 2013-03 Questions...

268

Enforcement Letter, Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc - July 30, 1999 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc - July 30, Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc - July 30, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lockheed-Martin Energy Systems, Inc - July 30, 1999 July 30, 1999 Issued to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. related to Radioactive Material Uptakes at the Y-12 National Security Complex This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the unexpected uptakes of a radioactive material, [ ], by employees at the Y-12 Plant subsequent to the June 8, 1998, restart of [ ] operations [ ]. These uptakes occurred at Y-12 Buildings 9212 and 9215 and involved 55 workers over a period of approximately five months. Radiation doses received by these workers ranged from 115 to 1124 millirem committed effective dose equivalent. During April 6-7, 1999, DOE conducted an investigation of

269

Enforcement Letter, Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 March 29, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Training Issues at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the referenced Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report which describes the failure to properly retrain portions of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) nonradiological workforce with General Employee Radiological Training (GERT) and the failure to provide such training to all temporary visitors and individuals badged at other DOE locations. These deficiencies were identified by the WSRC Price-Anderson Coordinator in a 10 CFR 835 assessment.

270

Enforcement Letter - Quality Assurance Deficiency Related to External Dosimetry Accreditation, March 31, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2006 31, 2006 Mr. Frank Russo President and General Manager Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Office 765 Lindsay Boulevard Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Subject: Enforcement Letter - Quality Assurance Deficiency Related to External Dosimetry Accreditation Dear Mr. Russo, This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding a quality assurance-related deficiency stemming from the recent external radiation dosimetry performance testing by the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) of dosimeters utilized at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This deficiency was identified through the quality assurance testing of external dosimeters by CH2M- WG Idaho (CWI) staff. During its employment as the management and operating (M&O) contractor of what is

271

Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc, - September 6, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Group Inc, - September 6, Group Inc, - September 6, 2007 Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc, - September 6, 2007 September 6, 2007 Enforcement Letter issued to CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., related to Quality Improvement Deficiencies at the Hanford Tank Farms The Department of Energy (DOE) held an Enforcement Conference on August 29, 2006, with CH2M Hill Hanford Group (CHG) to discuss potential violations of nuclear safety requirements described in our Investigation Summary Report dated July 26, 2006. At that time, DOE elected to defer a decision on a potential quality improvement violation related to recurring radiological events and deficiencies in the identification and control of radiological hazards at the Tank Farms. This decision was based upon the fact that CHG senior management had initiated radiological work

272

Enforcement Letter, Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Building 703-A - March 29, 2000 March 29, 2000 Issued to Westinghouse Savannah River Company related to Training Issues at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning the referenced Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) Report which describes the failure to properly retrain portions of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) nonradiological workforce with General Employee Radiological Training (GERT) and the failure to provide such training to all temporary visitors and individuals badged at other DOE locations. These deficiencies were identified by the WSRC Price-Anderson Coordinator in a 10 CFR 835 assessment.

273

NNSA Policy Letter: NAP-4B  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Policy Letter: NAP-4B Policy Letter: NAP-4B Date: June 30,2008 TITLE: Corporate Performance Evaluation Process for M&O Contractors I. OBJECTIVE: To establish and implement a uniform, corporate process for evaluation of National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Management and Operating (M&O) contractors' performance that promotes effective and efficient accomplishment of the NNSA mission while balancing safety and production effectively. This process results in documented, consistent and fair evaluation of M&O contractor performance. 11. APPLICABILITY: This process applies to all NNSA organizations and elements excluding NA-30. The Contractor Performance Evaluation Process will be an "NNSA-corporate," integrated process applied consistently by all NNSA sites. The corporate process may be updated

274

Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: The Honorable J. Gresham Barrett U.S. House of Representatives This letter is in response to an August 8, 2003 letter regarding Assistant Secretary Roberson's guidance memorandum providing direction for restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

275

Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs Letter: Restructuring & Managing of the Procurement Mechanisms Supporting Activities of the Environmental Management SSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: The Honorable J. Gresham Barrett U.S. House of Representatives This letter is in response to an August 8, 2003 letter regarding Assistant Secretary Roberson's guidance memorandum providing direction for restructuring and managing the procurement mechanisms that support the activities of the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs). Roberson Letter - September 25, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

276

Trigger and data acquisition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Past LEP experiments generate data at 0.5 MByte/s from particle detectors with over a quarter of a million readout channels. The process of reading out the electronic channels, treating them, and storing the date produced by each collision for further analysis by the physicists is called "Data Acquisition". Not all beam crossings produce interesting physics "events", picking the interesting ones is the task of the "Trigger" system. In order to make sure that the data is collected in good conditions the experiment's operation has to be constantly verified. In all, at LEP experiments over 100 000 parameters were monitored, controlled, and synchronized by the "Monotoring and control" system. In the future, LHC experiments will produce as much data in a single day as a LEP detector did in a full year's running with a raw data rate of 10 - 100 MBytes/s and will have to cope with some 800 million proton-proton collisions a second of these collisions only one in 100 million million is interesting for new particle se...

CERN. Geneva

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

277

2003 CS 647b Report Transmittal Letter to Cheney.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dick Cheney Dick Cheney President of the Senate United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. President: This letter is in response to the annual Competitive Sourcing reporting requirement contained in section 647(b) of Division F of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, for FY 2004, P.L. 108-199. The enclosed report on the Department of Energy's (DOE) Competitive Sourcing program complies with the agency reporting elements outlined in P.L. 108-199 for submitting the annual Congressional Competitive Sourcing Activity Report. In summary, DOE's Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 Competitive Sourcing Activity Report includes cost, savings, Federal full-time equivalent (FTE), and other information on the Department's

278

The ATLAS Missing ET trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Over the last few months, the ATLAS detector collected 900 GeV LHC collision events which allowed for the study the performance of the ATLAS Trigger and Data Acquisition system (TDAQ). With the 7 TeV collision data collected recently, the performance studies of the trigger system are critical for a successful physics program. In particular a large spectrum of physics results will rely on the capacity of the ATLAS TDAQ system to collect events based on the estimate of the missing transverse energy (MET) contained in each event. The MET trigger would be, for example, the primary trigger to be used in new physics searches for processes involving new weakly interacting particles, which could account for the astronomically observed dark matter. In addition to discovery perspectives, the MET trigger can also be used in combination with other triggers to control the rate of signatures involving low energy objects. For example, the MET trigger is necessary in order to measure non-boosted W in the tau channel. Finally...

Beauchemin, P; The ATLAS collaboration

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Evolving triggers for dynamic environments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Abstract. In this work we address the problem of managing the reactive behavior in distributed environments in which data continuously changes over time, where the users may need to explicitly express how the triggers should be (self) modified. To enable this we propose the (ECA) 2 Evolving and Context-Aware Event-Condition-Action paradigm for specifying triggers that capture the desired reactive behavior in databases which manage distributed and continuously changing data. Since both the monitored event and the condition part of the trigger may be continuous in nature, we introduce the concept of metatriggers to coordinate the detection of events and the evaluation of conditions. 1

Goce Trajcevski; Peter Scheuermann; Oliviu Ghica; Annika Hinze Agnes

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Predicting Storm-triggered Landslides  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An overview of storm-triggered landslides is presented. Then a recently developed and extensively verified landslide modeling system is used to illustrate the importance of two important but presently overlooked mechanisms involved in landslides. ...

Diandong Ren; Rong Fu; Lance M. Leslie; Robert E. Dickinson

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Event detection using trigger chain  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes a new architecture for event detection from text documents. The proposed system correctly identifies the sentences that describe an event of interest, using trigger chain to extract its participants. It exploits supervised method ...

S. Sangeetha; R. S. Thakur; Michael Arock

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

The LHCb trigger and readout  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We give a brief overview of the LHCb readout scheme and trigger strategy. The latter is based on three levels designed to reduce the event rate from 40 MHz to 2 kHz.

Legger, Federica

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

TRIGGERING THE LBL TIME PROJECTION CHAMBER  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Majority trigger recording for simulated event. Fig. 13 dE/11 Ripple trigger recording for simulated event. ENDCAP 0The ripple trigger recording for this test event is shown in

Ronan, M.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Enforcement Letter, Controlled Power Company - WEL-2012-02 |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Company - WEL-2012-02 October 23, 2012 Enforcement Letter issued to Controlled Power Company related to an Electrical Shock Near Miss that occurred in the Radiological...

285

Enforcement Letter, Computer Services, LLC- WEL-2012-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to On Computer Services, LLC, related to an Employee Electrical Shock that occurred in Technical Area 55 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory,

286

February 25, 2003, Department letter forwarding its Annual Report...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in January 2003). Recommendations Closed * The Assistant Secretary, Environmental Management, sent a letter to the Board on March 14, 2002, proposing closure of recommendation...

287

Letter of Intent: Architect of Record (AOR) | ENERGY STAR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Letter of Intent: Architect of Record (AOR) Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing buildings Commercial new...

288

Letter Report, Environment, Safety & Health Issues at the Ashtabula...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Letter Report, Environment, Safety & Health Issues at the Ashtabula Environmental Management Project,...

289

Enforcement Letter, Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc - May 4, 2000...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2000 Issued to Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc., related to Deficiencies in the Unresolved Safety Question Process at the Miamisburg Environmental Management Project This letter...

290

Resource Letter PSNAC-1: Physics and society: Nuclear arms control  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Resource Letter provides a guide to the literature on nuclear arms control for the nonspecialist. Journal articles and books are cited for the following topics: nuclear weapons

Alexander Glaser; Zia Mian

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Letter from California Portland Cement CEO to the Cement Industry...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Letter from California Portland Cement CEO to the Cement Industry Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing...

292

Enforcement Letter, BWXT Y-12- June 15, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to BWXT Y-12 related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies in construction activities at the Y-12 National Security Complex Highly Enriched Uranium Manufacturing Facility

293

Letter Response from the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Notice of Availability of Interpretive Rule on the Applicability of Current Water Conservation Standards for Showerheads Letter Response from the Plumbing...

294

Letter from Plumbing Manufacturers Institute to Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

re: Ex Parte Communication Letter from Plumbing Manufacturers Institute to Department of Energy re: Ex Parte Communication The Department issued an interpretive rule setting forth...

295

Letter Report: INS-L-07-03 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-03 7-03 Letter Report: INS-L-07-03 November 15, 2006 Alleged Waste of Funds Involving Excess Property at Rocky Flats Letter Report, Nuclear weapons production operations at Rocky Flats were discontinued in 1992. Subsequently, responsibility for Rocky Flats was reassigned from the Department's Office of Defense Programs to the Office of Environmental Management. In January 2000, DOE entered into a contract with Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC, for the closure of Rocky Flats by December 2006. Closure activities included the dismantling and removal of 805 structures, many of which were radioactively contaminated, as well as the disposal of 600,000 items of excess property and equipment. Rocky Flats was closed on October 13, 2005. The dismantling and removal of structures

296

Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC - May 19, 2000 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho, LLC - May 19, 2000 Idaho, LLC - May 19, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC - May 19, 2000 May 19, 2000 Issued to Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC, related to Personnel Contamination during a Hot Cell Exhaust System Filter Replacement activity at the Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the contamination of personnel while performing a hot cell exhaust system filter replacement. This incident occurred on July 21, 1999, at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory's (INEEL) Test Reactor Area Hot Cell Facility (TRA-632). Building TRA-632 is used by International Isotopes Idaho, Inc. (I4) for the preparation of

297

This Personal Property Letter (PPL) is issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Personal Property Letter (PPL) is issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement Personal Property Letter (PPL) is issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance Management pursuant to a delegation from the Secretary in order to provide interim guidance on personal property management matters. ******.* * ******...* *.*** CITATION FAR 45 DEAR 945 DEAR 970.5204-21 41 CFR 101 41 CFR 109 10 CFR 600.130 10 CFR 600.232 22 CFR 121 Pumose: The purpose of this PPL is to ensure that Department of Energy (DOE) organizations, contractors, and financial assistance recipients incorporate into their personal property management programs those controls appropriate to safeguard against the inadvertent transfer or disposal of certain items of personal property and related technical information which represent a high risk in terms of nuclear proliferation and/or

298

Enforcement Letter, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, 2009 Enforcement Letter, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho LLC , - May 20, 2009 May 20, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC, for Electrical Safety Deficiencies at the Idaho National Laboratory In July 2008, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security's, Office of Enforcement was made aware of numerous, longstanding electrical safety deficiencies associated with electrical equipment located on the east side of the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC). The Office of Enforcement is also aware that shortly after electrical safety issues with this equipment were identified by a CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC (CWI) worker in May 2007, CWI completed an Engineering Design File

299

Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C - September 11, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

C - September 11, 2000 C - September 11, 2000 Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C - September 11, 2000 September 11, 2000 Issued to Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC related to Noncompliances with Design and Procurement Requirements at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of noncompliance report number NTS-RFO--KHLL-SITEWIDE-2000-0005, which describes noncompliances with the design and procurement requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Rule). 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(iii) requires that procured items and services shall meet established requirements and perform as required; 10 CFR 830.120(c)(2)(ii) requires that design work including changes, shall incorporate applicable requirements and design

300

Docket No. EO-05-01: Letter from Kevin Kolevar, Director Office of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from Kevin Kolevar, Director Office of from Kevin Kolevar, Director Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, to Mr. Robert Driscoll, CEO Mirant Mid-Atlantic, LLC Docket No. EO-05-01: Letter from Kevin Kolevar, Director Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, to Mr. Robert Driscoll, CEO Mirant Mid-Atlantic, LLC Docket No. EO-05-01: On December 20, 2005, the Secretary of Energy issued DOE Order No. 202-05-3, pursuant to section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.c. § 824a(c), ordering the operation of the Potomac River Generating Station (the Plant) owned by Mirant Potomac River, LLC (Mirant). DOE has determined that the operation of the Plant under Option A pursuant to DOE's January 4, 2006 instructions does not provide an adequate level of electric reliability to the Central D.C. area under current circumstances. Operation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Subject: DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS (Title Transfer, Loan, and Abandonment) References: Atomic Energy Act Sections 161g and 161j., Title 42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) sections 2201g, and 22201j 42 U.S.C 16312 (Public Law 109-58, title IX, section 972, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 899), 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 102-36.380-395, Federal Management Regulation (FMR) DOE Order 580.1, Department of Energy Personal Property Program 4.c(3) DOE Guide 580.1-1, Department of Energy Personal Property Management Guide Chapter 11.8 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does This AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded, or canceled. Guidance in this Acquisition Letter shall

302

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2002 31, 2002 Dr. William J. Madia [ ] Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6255 Subject: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Enforcement Letter Dear Dr. Madia: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS- ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2002-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation report, associated corrective action plan, and discussion with site personnel. The subject NTS report described a series of deficiencies that resulted in several personnel being exposed to unanticipated radiation fields during the startup testing of an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) source at the [facility]. The exposures occurred

303

Oct 2009 final concurrence letter for BPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Justice Justice Office of Dispute Resolution - - Washington, D.C. 20530 October 22,2009 The Honorable Steven Chu Secretary for the U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 - . -- - . Dear Secretary Chu, This is in reference to the letter dated January 15,2009, fiom your predecessor, Honorable Samuel W. Bodman, which accompanied a policy document outlining guidance for the use of binding arbitration in specified cases by the Bonneville Power Administration. The Attorney General has reviewed the document "Bonneville Power Administration's Guidance on the Use of Binding Arbitration for BPA Contracts" and concurs with the proposed policy for use of binding arbitration which is contained therein. Mr. Holder's concurrence is dated October 9,2009.

304

LANL Enforcement Letter - 7/7/2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2003 7, 2003 Vice Admiral George P. Nanos [ ] Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Subject: Los Alamos National Laboratory Enforcement Letter Dear Admiral Nanos: The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) is concerned that nuclear safety at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL/Laboratory) continues to demonstrate a negative performance trend. Our observations are based on numerous recent events involving both nuclear safety and radiological control issues. Since our last discussions at the March 2003 LANL Price-Anderson Amendments Act Enforcement Conference, my office has reviewed numerous nuclear safety and radiological events as part of enforcement action follow-up and monitoring. The events

305

WEL-2012-04 URS enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Activity Observation Reports that documented the noncompliances associated with this event and nine other fall protection occurrences in the previous nine months. URS...

306

GENERAL LETTER 2008-3 DATE: October 20, 2008  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

GENERAL LETTER 2008-3 DATE: October 20, 2008 TO: Administrative Heads of State Agencies and Records-site Public Records Storage Facilities This General Letter applies to state agencies that store public records Facilities (revised 07/1999). OFF-SITE PUBLIC RECORDS STORAGE FACILITIES State agencies may store public

Oliver, Douglas L.

307

Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee for Receiving the EPA's 2006 Citizen's Excellence in Community Involvement Award Letter: Congratulating Oak Ridge SSAB and its Stewardship Committee for Receiving the EPA's 2006 Citizen's Excellence in Community Involvement Award From: Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, James A. Rispoli To: Mr. Kerry Trammell, Chair Site Specific Advisory Board This letter congratulaties Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board and its Stewardship Committee on being awarded the Environmental Protection Agency's 2006 Citizen's Excellence in Community Involvement Award. Rispoli Letter - June 21, 2006 More Documents & Publications EM SSAB Conference Calls - October 20, 2005 EM SSAB Conference Calls - June 8, 2005

308

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security LLC, - May Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory In our recent dialogue via televideo with your Deputy, safeguards and security director, and other key managers of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC; the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC- May 15, 2008

309

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security LLC - May 15, 2008 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LLC - May 15, 2008 LLC - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security LLC - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Los Alamos National Laboratory In our recent dialogue with you and members of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS); the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. We appreciate the laboratory's perspectives and your ongoing efforts to address these concerns. Enforcement Letter , Bechtel BWXT Idaho LLC - March 17, 2008

310

Enforcement Letter, Sandia Corporation - May 15, 2008 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Corporation - May 15, 2008 Corporation - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Sandia Corporation - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Sandia Corporation related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Sandia National Laboratories In our recent dialogue with Dr. Al Romig, Mr. Michael Hazen and members of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Sandia Corporation; the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. We appreciate the laboratories' perspectives and your ongoing efforts to address these concerns. Enforcement Letter, Sandia Corporation - May 15, 2008

311

Letter Report Final SA _01-17-01_.PDF | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter Report Final SA 01-17-01.PDF&0; Letter Report Final SA 01-17-01.PDF&0; Letter Report Final SA 01-17-01.PDF&0; More Documents & Publications O:HOMEPAGEFOIA...

312

Secretary Chu Letter to 2nd US-China EE Forum | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Letter to 2nd US-China EE Forum Secretary Chu Letter to 2nd US-China EE Forum English and Chinese translation of Secretary Chu's letter to participants in the 2nd...

313

Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

with respect to the Emergency Petition and with respect to the Emergency Petition and Complaint Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public Service Commission with respect to the Emergency Petition and Complaint Docket No. EO-05-01: We have received the Petition and Complaint that you filed with the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on August 24, 2005, on behalf of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission. The Petition requests DOE to provide emergency relief under section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(a), to require continued operation ofthe Mirant Power Plant. DOE, in consultation with other Federal agencies, is examining this matter expeditiously to determine the facts necessary to render an appropriate decision.

314

CWI Enforcement Letter (NEL-2011-02)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

at (301) 903-7707. cc: Lee Fife, CWI Richard Provencher, DOE-ID Richard Azzaro, DNFSB Sincerely, irector Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security...

315

Letter Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Regarding the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's ("DC PSC") Emergency Petition Letter Clarifying the Position of the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Regarding the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's ("DC PSC") Emergency Petition Docket No. EO-05-01: During the course of participating in the above-captioned Department of Energy ("DOE") docket, Robert G. Burnley, Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality ("Director"), has filed two pleadings regarding the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's ("DC PSC") Emergency Petition. After initial uncertainty

316

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-26 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-26 September 28, 2007 Department's Implementation of the Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System - Transition Planning, Interfaces, and Testing The Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System (STRIPES) initiative is an important component of the Department of Energy's (Department or DOE) I-MANAGE program. Consistent with the President's Management Agenda and laws such as the E-Government Act, the STRIPES project has been undertaken to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of awarding and administering acquisition instruments- including managing and operating contracts, interagency and blanket purchase agreements, and purchase and task orders. The initiative will ultimately replace and/or consolidate as

317

Enforcement Letter, Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex - April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex - April 13, 2010 April 13, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex related to Deficiencies in the Fabrication of Safety Significant Embed Plates at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement's investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance deficiencies in the fabrication of safety significant embed plates. These embed plates were fabricated by Parsons Technology Development and Fabrication Complex (PTDFC) a supplier to

318

Post-Closure Inspection Letter Report for Corrective Action Units (CAUs) on the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS)  

SciTech Connect

This letter serves as the post-closure inspection letter report for CAUs on the NNSS for Calendar Year 2011

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2012-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

319

Automobile Dealer Letter-FINAL.indd  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Agency Agency December 2013 SUBJECT: The 2014 Model Year EPA/DOE Fuel Economy Guide Dear Automobile Dealer: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) seek your help in providing your customers with information about fuel economy and the benefi ts of using more fuel-effi cient vehicles. Fuel economy is an important factor for consumers when shopping for a vehicle. EPA regulations require automobile dealers to prominently display the EPA/DOE Fuel Economy Guide booklets at each location where new automobiles are offered for sale and to make them available to the public at no charge (40 CFR 600.405-08 and 600.407-08). The regulations ensure that prospective customers have ready access to fuel economy information for current model year vehicles.

320

FAL 2006-04, Financial Assistance Letters Remaining in Effect  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Financial Assistance Letters (FALs) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued FALs Financial Assistance Letters (FALs) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued FALs have been superseded by a formal rulemaking, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. *************** Financial Assistance Letters Remaining in Effect Number Date Subject 2006-03 05/10/2006 Implementation Guidance for Awarding Technology Investment Agreements Financial Assistance Letters Discontinued Number Date Subject Disposition 2004-03 02/12/2004 Intellectual Property Moved to the Guide to Financial Assistance 2004-06 11/02/2004 Award Terms Moved to the Guide to Financial Assistance 2005-03 06/27/2005 Eligibility Determination Required by Section 2306 of the Energy Policy Act Moved to the Guide to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 May 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to an Unintentional Firearm Discharge at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center at the Hanford Site, The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the accidental firearm discharge that occurred in an occupied classroom during training led by Ballelle at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center (HAMMER) in August 2009. The weapon discharge, which occurred during unsupervised student handling of a handgun, could have resulted in a fatal injury to one of the many students in the classroom. Battelle

322

CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT This Fiscal Year 2008 Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Letter Report presents an evaluation of the adequacy of the one mill per kilowatt-hour fee paid by commercial nuclear power generators for the permanent disposal of their spent nuclear fuel by the Government. This evaluation recommends no fee change. CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2008 FEE ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT More Documents & Publications FY 2007 Fee Adequacy, Pub 2008 Fiscal Year 2007 Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Assessment Report January 16, 2013 Secretarial Determination of the Adequacy of the Nuclear

323

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees February 1, 2013 - 11:00am Addthis U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department Secretary Chu Secretary Chu Former Secretary of Energy In a letter to Energy Department employees today, Energy Secretary Steven Chu highlighted the tremendous progress of the last four years, and

324

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to UT-Battelle, LLC related to a Radioactive Material Release at the Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement within the Office of Health, Safety and Security has conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2008-000 1, Operational Emergency at Building 6000, Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility. Our evaluation included a review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Management Investigation Team Report dated November 19, 2008, the associated corrective action plan,

325

Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Virginia to ENSR International of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing Responses to Comments made Concerning the Modified Protocol for Downwash Modeling-Mirant Potomac River, LLC Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing Responses to Comments made Concerning the Modified Protocol for Downwash Modeling-Mirant Potomac River, LLC Docket No. EO-05-01: Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing Responses to Comments made Concerning the Modified Protocol for Downwash Modeling-Mirant Potomac River, LLC. The comments are addressed for the most part in this letter. As to the electronic media containing the modeling files, an additional copy will be necessary for the public comment process. Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to ENSR International Detailing

326

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 Enfrocement Letter, Battelle Memorial Institute - May 20, 2010 May 20, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Memorial Institute related to an Unintentional Firearm Discharge at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center at the Hanford Site, The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement conducted an evaluation of the accidental firearm discharge that occurred in an occupied classroom during training led by Ballelle at the Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center (HAMMER) in August 2009. The weapon discharge, which occurred during unsupervised student handling of a handgun, could have resulted in a fatal injury to one of the many students in the classroom. Battelle

327

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees Letter from Secretary Steven Chu to Energy Department Employees February 1, 2013 - 11:00am Addthis U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu during an online town hall to discuss President Obama's clean energy and innovation agenda on January 11, 2011. | Photo by Charles Watkins, Contractor, Energy Department Secretary Chu Secretary Chu Former Secretary of Energy In a letter to Energy Department employees today, Energy Secretary Steven Chu highlighted the tremendous progress of the last four years, and

328

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar June 9, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON - U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu sent the following letter to Senator Richard Lugar today regarding Senator Lugar's "Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010." The text is below: June 9, 2010 The Honorable Richard Lugar United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Lugar: I welcome your introduction today of the Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010. In particular, I appreciate your ideas for reducing America's oil dependence - which has taken on greater urgency as a result of the BP oil spill. I also commend your focus on energy efficiency, which as you have noted is the fastest, cheapest route to our energy and climate change

329

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar Secretary Chu Letter to Senator Lugar June 9, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON - U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu sent the following letter to Senator Richard Lugar today regarding Senator Lugar's "Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010." The text is below: June 9, 2010 The Honorable Richard Lugar United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Lugar: I welcome your introduction today of the Practical Energy and Climate Plan Act of 2010. In particular, I appreciate your ideas for reducing America's oil dependence - which has taken on greater urgency as a result of the BP oil spill. I also commend your focus on energy efficiency, which as you have noted is the fastest, cheapest route to our energy and climate change

330

Enforcement Letter, Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex- April 13, 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter issued to Parsons Technology Development & Fabrication Complex related to Deficiencies in the Fabrication of Safety Significant Embed Plates at the Salt Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site,

331

BWXT Y-12 Enforcement Letter, June 15, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2006 Mr. George Dials General Manager BWXT Y-12 Y-12 National Security Complex P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8245 Subject: BWXT Y-12 Enforcement Letter Dear Mr. Dials: The...

332

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison...

333

Idaho Power Letter with Logo in Color  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel ATTN: NBP RFI: Data Access 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585 Re: DOE Request for Information - Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy I. INTRODUCTION Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power") hereby submits the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE" or "Department") request for information from interested parties on state efforts to enact Smart Grid privacy and data collection policies; individual utility practices regarding data access and collection; third

334

A General Framework for Convective Trigger Functions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A general framework for the trigger function used in convective parameterization routines in mesoscale models is proposed. The framework is based on the diagnosis of the accessibility of potential buoyant energy. Specifically, the trigger ...

Robert F. Rogers; J. M. Fritsch

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

The Trigger System of the CMS Experiment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We give an overview of the main features of the CMS trigger and data acquisition (DAQ) system. Then, we illustrate the strategies and trigger configurations (trigger tables) developed for the detector calibration and physics program of the CMS experiment, at start-up of LHC operations, as well as their possible evolution with increasing luminosity. Finally, we discuss the expected CPU time performance of the trigger algorithms and the CPU requirements for the event filter farm at start-up.

Felcini, Marta

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

The Trigger System of the CMS Experiment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We give an overview of the main features of the CMS trigger and data acquisition (DAQ) system. Then, we illustrate the strategies and trigger configurations (trigger tables) developed for the detector calibration and physics program of the CMS experiment, at start-up of LHC operations, as well as their possible evolution with increasing luminosity. Finally, we discuss the expected CPU time performance of the trigger algorithms and the CPU requirements for the event filter farm at start-up.

Marta Felcini; for the CMS Collaboration

2008-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

337

November 21, 2006, Board letter providing feedback on the 2004-1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

November 21, 2006 November 21, 2006 The Honorable Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-1000 Dear Secretary Bodman: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) received your letter of October 12, 2006, enclosing the revised Implementation Plan (IP) for the Board’s Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations. The Board has reviewed the IP and finds it to be responsive to the Recommendation. The Board would also like to take this opportunity to close Recommendation 95-2, Safety Management. The Recommendation 2004-1 IP and the recently issued Department of Energy (DOE) Manual 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual, contain the actions necessary to reinvigorate Integrated Safety Management (ISM). In addition, DOE has taken an

338

December 20, 2005, Department letter forwarding the revised version of the  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

December 20, 2005 December 20, 2005 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Ave, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004 Dear Mr. Chairman: This letter transmits to you a revised version of the Department of Energy’s draft Manual DOE M 450.4-X, Integrated Safety Management System Manual. This revised version represents a significant improvement over the November 2, 2005 version previously provided to your staff. This improvement occurred by addressing internal DOE comments on the Manual. The Department has also addressed various informal comments provided by your staff. The Department remains interested in the Board’s comments on this Manual. Please forward any comments regarding this draft document by January 18, 2006. If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 586-3887.

339

Enforcement Letter, CH2M-WG Idaho - NEL-2011-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M-WG Idaho - NEL-2011-02 M-WG Idaho - NEL-2011-02 Enforcement Letter, CH2M-WG Idaho - NEL-2011-02 September 28, 2011 Issued to CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC related to Quality Assurance and Work Control Issues during Construction of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight conducted an evaluation of the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance and work control deficiencies that occurred during the construction of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP) at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory. On February 9, 2011, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC (CWI) reported noncompliances associated with these deficiencies in DOE's Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) in reports NTS-ID--CWI-IWTU-2010-0002

340

Microsoft Word - AHAM Letter Exparte 122310.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 23, 2010 December 23, 2010 Mr. Victor Petrolati U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. Washington, DC Subject: Ex Parte Meeting with DOE and Navigant Consulting on Battery Charger Energy Standards, December 6, 2010 Dear Mr. Petrolati: This memo memorializes the meeting between AHAM, PTI and the Department of Energy on December 6, 2010 for inclusion in the public docket. In summary, during the meeting, we were able to cover several topics that are related to DOE setting the standards for consumer battery chargers that apply to power tools and other appliances and fall under the category of Motor Operated and or Detachable Battery (MADB) chargers. 1. AHAM and PTI noted that some of the Candidate Standards Levels for Product Classes 2, 3,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

CWI Enforcement Letter (NEL-2011-02)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

J. Dieter J. Dieter President Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 28, 2011 CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC P.O. Box 2010 MS-9204 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403-2010 NEL-2011-02 Dear Mr. Dieter: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight conducted an evaluation of the facts and circumstances associated with quality assurance and work control deficiencies that occurred during the construction of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP) at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory. On February 9, 2011, CH2M-Washington Group Idaho, LLC (CWI) reported noncompliances associated with these deficiencies in DOE's Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) in reports NTS-ID--CWI-IWTU-2010-0002 and

342

Microsoft Word - Letter to Chu.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

John L. Nau, III John L. Nau, III Chairman Susan S. Barnes Vice Chairman John M. Fowler Executive Director Preserving America's Heritage February 5, 2010 The Honorable Dr. Steven Chu Secretary of the Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Programs (OWIP) Dear Secretary Chu: In recent conversations between our agencies, the Department of Energy (DOE) requested the assistance of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) in developing a tool that the Department of Energy could share with the States administering the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG), State Energy Plan (SEP), and the Weatherization Assistance (WAP) Programs. Since DOE

343

LHCb Level-0 Trigger Detectors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The calorimeter and muon systems are essential components to provide a trigger for the LHCb experiment. The calorimeter system comprises a scintillating pad detector and pre-shower, followed by electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters. The calorimeter system allows photons, electrons and hadrons to be identified, and their energy to be measured. The muon system consists of five measuring stations equipped with Multi-Wire Proportional Chambers (MWPCs) and triple-Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) detectors, separated by iron filters. It allows the muons identification and transverse momentum measurement. The status of the two systems and their expected performance is presented.

Sarti, Alessio

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

ATLAS Trigger Performance and Initial Running  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An efficient trigger will be crucial to charged Higgs boson searches at the LHC. The ATLAS trigger will need to achieve a rejection factor of about 10^7 against random proton-proton collisions, and still be able to efficiently select signal events. Commissioning of the ATLAS trigger is progressing well, and much has already been done using cosmic rays and by replaying simulated physics events through the system. Detailed plans have been developed for commissioning with single LHC beams and the first collisions. The evolution of the ATLAS trigger towards stable running will be discussed in view of the searches for the charged Higgs boson. In particular, the determination of the trigger efficiency will be discussed, both in the case of the inclusive lepton triggers and the combined triggers needed for charged Higgs boson searches.

Winklmeier, F

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Performance of the ATLAS Trigger System  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS Trigger System reduces the event rate from the bunch-crossing rate of $40 \\rm \\ MHz$ to an average recording rate of $200 \\rm \\ Hz$ by selecting high-$p_{T}$ physics events. The ATLAS Trigger is composed of three levels. The first level (L1) is implemented in custom-built electronics, the two-stage High Level Trigger (HLT) is implemented in software executed on large computing farms. The L1 consists of calorimeter, muon and forward triggers to identify electron, photon, jet and muon candidates, as well as event features such as missing transverse energy. These inputs are used by the L1 Central Trigger to generate an L1 Accept (L1A) decision. L1A and timing information is sent to all sub-detectors and summary information is sent to the subsequent levels of the Trigger System. In this paper the performance of the ATLAS Trigger System in 2010 and 2011 is presented.

Gabaldon, C

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

LETTER TEMPLATE TO PROJECTS ON HOLD  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ON HOLD ON HOLD DATE, 2011 NAME ORGANIZATION ADDRESS CITY, ST ZIP Dear NAME: Thank you for your ongoing interest in the Section 1705 loan guarantee program. To date, under the 1705 program, the Department of Energy (DOE) has issued conditional commitments totaling almost $11 billion to nineteen clean energy projects with total project costs of over $16 billion. These projects will support the development of our nation's 21 st century clean energy economy and create thousands of good- paying jobs. As you know, the program's limited appropriations (commitments already made will likely utilize approximately two-thirds of the program's appropriated funds), deep pool of quality applicants, and

347

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

26, 2013 26, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period July 29, 2013 through August 12, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) July 31, 2013: The Idaho Treatment Group, LLC (ITG), the managing contractor for the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project received a warning letter from the State of Idaho's Department of Environmental quality regarding self- reported RCRA permit violations which

348

DOE F 3511.1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ORGANIZATION CODE ORGANIZATION CODE 5. SENSITIVITY (Circle Number) 6. FINANCIAL STATEMENT REQUIRED (Circle) 21. FUNCTIONAL CLASS CODE FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS 25. Comp. Level 25. Comp. Area Signature 28. Agency Code 17. Pay Plan Classification Title (continued) 13. DOE F 3511.1 (06-94) (Formerly DOE F 3200.5) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY POSITION DESCRIPTION To be completed by Personnel 1. POSITION NUMBER 3. ACTION (Circle Letter) A=ADD C=CHG D=DEL PART I: TO BE COMPLETED BY THE INITIATING OFFICE 4. ORGANIZATIONAL LOCATION OF POSITION a. First Subdivision (Below DOE) b. Second Subdivision c. Third Subdivision d. Fourth Subdivision e. Fifth Subdivision f. Sixth Subdivision 7. COMPUTER POSITION 8. LEVEL OF ACCESS 9. DUTY STATION

349

Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions - September 8, 2006 September 8, 2006 Enforcement Letter issued to Washington TRU Solutions, LLC related to Quality Assurance Deficiencies associated with the Super High-Efficiency Neutron Counter Non-Destructive Assay System Refurbishment at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-CBFO-WIPP-WIPP-2006-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation/causal analysis and discussion with you and other site personnel during an informal conference held on August 1, 2006. Enforcement Letter, Washington TRU Solutions -September 8, 2006

350

Enforcement Letter, LANL - July 7, 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 7, 2003 July 7, 2003 Enforcement Letter, LANL - July 7, 2003 July 7, 2003 Enforcement Letter issued to Los Alamos National Laboratory related to Negative Performance Trends The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) is concerned that nuclear safety at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL/Laboratory) continues to demonstrate a negative performance trend. Our observations are based on numerous recent events involving both nuclear safety and radiological control issues. Since our last discussions at the March 2003 LANL Price-Anderson Amendments Act Enforcement Conference, my office has reviewed numerous nuclear safety and radiological events as part of enforcement action follow-up and monitoring. Enforcement Letter, LANL - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications

351

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2010-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WEL-2010-02 WEL-2010-02 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2010-02 December 23, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to National Security Technologies, LLC related to a flash fire event at the Nevada National Security Site The Office of Enforcement reviewed the NSTec fire investigation report, management review report, root cause analysis (RCA), and corrective action plan; the Martin-Harris Construction Environmental, Safety and Health Plan; and the construction subcontract and accompanying exhibits. The Office of Enforcement also obtained and reviewed a number of core company directives, assessments, and inspection documents identified in exhibit E of the subcontract. Enforcement Letter, WEL-2010-02 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security - May 2013

352

Investigation Letter Report: I11IG002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter Report: I11IG002 Letter Report: I11IG002 Investigation Letter Report: I11IG002 August 17, 2011 Impact of Copper Thefts on the Department of Energy A series of news articles during the last several months have reported increased thefts of copper nationally, including several that have interrupted electrical distribution and telephone service in communities across the country. The Department of Energy's laboratories, environmental remediation sites, generating stations and other facilities have not been immune to this problem. Over the last few years, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has successfully investigated numerous reports of copper thefts from Department sites nationwide. The OIG believes that there are several practical, cost-effective steps that the Department can

353

Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security - February 16, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- February 16, - February 16, 2007 Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security - February 16, 2007 February 16, 2007 Letter to Los Alamos National Security, LLC regarding the Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Operational Performance at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Today the enclosed Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) was issued to the University of California related to operational performance deficiencies at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Although civil penalties associated with the prior contract were waived by statute, the proposed penalty would have equaled $1.1 million dollars. Enforcement Letter, Los Alamos National Security-February 16, 2007 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Los Alamos National Laboratory -

354

Enforcement Letter, Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter, Intennech, Inc. - March 26, 2010 March 26, 2010 Enforcement Letter issued to Intermech, Inc. related to Installation and Inspection of Anchor Bolts and Pipe Supports at the DUF6 Conversion Buildings at the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with deficiencies in the installation and inspection of anchor bolts and pipe supports at the DUF6 Conversion Buildings, located at the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants. The investigation report, dated April 23, 2009, was provided under separate cover. Potential violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management,

355

Microsoft Word - supplemental comment letter.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 23, 2006 Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Dear Mr. Mansueti: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., submits the following comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) February 17 Order for Rehearing Emergency Order 202-05-3. District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO- 05-01, Order No. 202-06-01 (Dep't of Energy, Feb. 17, 2006).

356

WEL-2012-04 URS enforcement Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

H. Zarges H. Zarges President Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 5, 2012 URS E&C Holdings Incorporated 7800 East Union A venue, Suite 1 00 Denver, Colorado 8023 7 WEL-2012-04 Dear Mr. Zarges: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated a series of fall protection occurrences associated with URS E&C Holdings Incorporated's (URS) operations at the Department of Energy (DOE) Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) Disposition Project (DP) in Niskayuna, New York. These occurrences took place between November 2011 and July 2012, and included an event involving a URS employee working close to a second floor wall opening in building G2 at SPRU on July 9, 2012. On July 19, 2012, URS reported the noncompliances associated with the July 9 fall hazard

357

Plant Award Application Letter | ENERGY STAR Buildings & Plants  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Application Letter Application Letter Secondary menu About us Press room Contact Us Portfolio Manager Login Facility owners and managers Existing buildings Commercial new construction Industrial energy management Small business Service providers Service and product providers Verify applications for ENERGY STAR certification Design commercial buildings Energy efficiency program administrators Commercial and industrial program sponsors Associations State and local governments Federal agencies Tools and resources Training In This Section Campaigns Commercial building design Communications resources Energy management guidance Financial resources Portfolio Manager Products and purchasing Recognition Research and reports Service and product provider (SPP) resources Success stories Target Finder Technical documentation

358

The ATLAS Trigger System Commissioning and Performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS trigger has been used very successfully to collect collision data during 2009 and 2010 LHC running at centre of mass energies of 900 GeV, 2.36 TeV, and 7 TeV. This paper presents the ongoing work to commission the ATLAS trigger with proton collisions, including an overview of the performance of the trigger based on extensive online running. We describe how the trigger has evolved with increasing LHC luminosity and give a brief overview of plans for forthcoming LHC running.

A. Hamilton

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

359

Commissioning of the ATLAS Muon Trigger Selection  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The performance of the three-level ATLAS muon trigger as evaluated by using LHC data is presented. Events have been selected by using only the hardware-based Level-1 trigger in order to commission and to subsequently enable the (software-based) selections of the High Level Trigger. Studies aiming at selecting prompt muons from J/{\\psi} and at reducing non prompt muon contamination have been performed. A brief overview on how the muon triggers evolve with increasing luminosity is given.

Musto, Elisa

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Commissioning of the ATLAS Muon Trigger Selection  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The performance of the three-level ATLAS muon trigger as evaluated by using LHC data is presented. Events have been selected by using only the hardware-based Level-1 trigger in order to commission and to subsequently enable the (software-based) selections of the High Level Trigger. Studies aiming at selecting prompt muons from J/{\\psi} and at reducing non prompt muon contamination have been performed. A brief overview on how the muon triggers evolve with increasing luminosity is given.

Elisa Musto

2010-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

A Novel in situ Trigger Combination Method  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Searches for rare physics processes using particle detectors in high-luminosity colliding hadronic beam environments require the use of multi-level trigger systems to reject colossal background rates in real time. In analyses like the search for the Higgs boson, there is a need to maximize the signal acceptance by combining multiple different trigger chains when forming the offline data sample. In such statistically limited searches, datasets are often amassed over periods of several years, during which the trigger characteristics evolve and their performance can vary significantly. Reliable production cross-section measurements and upper limits must take into account a detailed understanding of the effective trigger inefficiency for every selected candidate event. We present as an example the complex situation of three trigger chains, based on missing energy and jet energy, to be combined in the context of the search for the Higgs (H) boson produced in association with a W boson at the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF). We briefly review the existing techniques for combining triggers, namely the inclusion, division, and exclusion methods. We introduce and describe a novel fourth in situ method whereby, for each candidate event, only the trigger chain with the highest a priori probability of selecting the event is considered. The in situ combination method has advantages of scalability to large numbers of differing trigger chains and of insensitivity to correlations between triggers. We compare the inclusion and in situ methods for signal event yields in the CDF WH search.

Buzatu, Adrian; Warburton, Andreas; /McGill U.; Krumnack, Nils; /Baylor U.; Yao, Wei-Ming; /LBL, Berkeley

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

Continued on next page A letter explaining the 2005 HVAC  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Continued on next page A letter explaining the 2005 HVAC Change-out to consumers is available this bulletin, or downloaded from the 2005 HVAC Change out Information website at: www.energy.ca.gov/title24 duct sealing requirements for HVAC change-outs in existing homes become effective October 1, 2005

363

Resource Letter PTG-1: Precision Tests of Gravity  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Resource Letter provides an introduction to some of the main current topics in experimental tests of general relativity as well as to some of the historical literature. It is intended to serve as a guide to the field for upper-division undergraduate and graduate students

Clifford M. Will

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Book Reviews Gerber, Alexandra. 2010. `The Letter versus the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Book Reviews 485 Gerber, Alexandra. 2010. `The Letter versus the Spirit: Barriers to Meaningful for Higher Education Cheltenham, 2008: Edward Elgar Publishing (and TIA-CREFF), 191 pp. This book brings rare. Most of the authors in this book use the concept of `generations' to discuss in broad terms how

Heller, Don

365

Letter to the Editor Geomagnetic storm eects at low latitudes  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Letter to the Editor Geomagnetic storm eects at low latitudes R. G. Rastogi School of Physics, Ahmedabad 380 009, India Received: 30 April 1998 / Accepted: 3 September 1998 Abstract. The geomagnetic corrected for geomagnetic latitudes. The disturbance daily variation of H at equatorial stations showed

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

366

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 More Documents & Publications FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS

367

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 More Documents & Publications FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS

368

Nonlinear dynamical triggering of slow slip  

SciTech Connect

Among the most fascinating, recent discoveries in seismology have been the phenomena of triggered slip, including triggered earthquakes and triggered-tremor, as well as triggered slow, silent-slip during which no seismic energy is radiated. Because fault nucleation depths cannot be probed directly, the physical regimes in which these phenomena occur are poorly understood. Thus determining physical properties that control diverse types of triggered fault sliding and what frictional constitutive laws govern triggered faulting variability is challenging. We are characterizing the physical controls of triggered faulting with the goal of developing constitutive relations by conducting laboratory and numerical modeling experiments in sheared granular media at varying load conditions. In order to simulate granular fault zone gouge in the laboratory, glass beads are sheared in a double-direct configuration under constant normal stress, while subject to transient perturbation by acoustic waves. We find that triggered, slow, silent-slip occurs at very small confining loads ({approx}1-3 MPa) that are smaller than those where dynamic earthquake triggering takes place (4-7 MPa), and that triggered slow-slip is associated with bursts of LFE-like acoustic emission. Experimental evidence suggests that the nonlinear dynamical response of the gouge material induced by dynamic waves may be responsible for the triggered slip behavior: the slip-duration, stress-drop and along-strike slip displacement are proportional to the triggering wave amplitude. Further, we observe a shear-modulus decrease corresponding to dynamic-wave triggering relative to the shear modulus of stick-slips. Modulus decrease in response to dynamical wave amplitudes of roughly a microstrain and above is a hallmark of elastic nonlinear behavior. We believe that the dynamical waves increase the material non-affine elastic deformation during shearing, simultaneously leading to instability and slow-slip. The inferred triggered slow-slip on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, CA., due to December, 2003 Mw6.5 San Simeon Earthquake (Breguier et al., Science 321, p.1478, 2008) shows very similar characteristics to what we observe in the laboratory, suggesting an extremely low in situ effective stress or a weak fault and a nonlinear-dynamical triggering mechanism.

Johnson, Paul A [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Knuth, Matthew W [WISCONSIN; Kaproth, Bryan M [PENN STATE; Carpenter, Brett [PENN STATE; Guyer, Robert A [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Le Bas, Pierre - Yves [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Daub, Eric G [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Marone, Chris [PENN STATE

2010-12-10T23:59:59.000Z

369

Deep convection triggering by boundary layer thermals. Part 1: LES analysis and stochastic triggering formulation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper proposes a new formulation of the deep convection triggering for GCM (General Circulation Model) convective parameterizations. This triggering is driven by evolving properties of the strongest boundary-layer thermals. To investigate ...

Nicolas Rochetin; Fleur Couvreux; Jean-Yves Grandpeix; Catherine Rio

370

Tools for Trigger Aware Analyses in ATLAS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In order to search for rare processes, all four LHC experiments have to use advanced triggering methods for selecting and recording the events of interest. At the expected nominal LHC operating conditions only about 0.0005% of the collision events can be kept for physics analysis in ATLAS. Therefore the understanding and evaluation of the trigger performance is one of the most crucial parts of any physics analysis. ATLASs first level trigger is composed of custom-built hardware, while the second and third levels are implemented using regular PCs running reconstruction and selection algorithms. Because of this split, accessing the results of the trigger execution for the two stages is different. The complexity of the software trigger presents further difficulties in accessing the trigger data. To make the job of the physicists easier when evaluating the trigger performance, multiple general-use tools are provided by the ATLAS Trigger Analysis Tools group. The TrigDecisionTool, a general tool, is provided to...

Krasznahorkay, A; The ATLAS collaboration; Stelzer, J

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

Joint Hydraulic Institute/ASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Joint Hydraulic InstituteASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification of Point 2 Joint Hydraulic InstituteASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification of Point 2 We would like to...

372

Information for a Letter of Recommendation to be written by Dr. Craig S. Hood, Biol. Sci.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Information for a Letter of Recommendation to be written by Dr. Craig S. Hood, Biol. Sci. Dear for a Letter of Recommendation to be written by Dr. Craig S. Hood, Biol. Sci. By signing below, I am waiving

Hood, Craig

373

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-06 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

06 Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-07-06 January 21, 2007 Office of Science's Implementation of the Federal Information Security Management Act Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-12-06 More...

374

Post-Closure Inspection Letter Report for Corrective Action Units on the Nevada National Security Site  

SciTech Connect

This letter serves as the post-closure inspection letter report for corrective action units on the Nevada National Security Site for calendar year 2011. Copies of completed inspection checklists are included in this report.

NSTec Environmental Restoration

2011-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

375

Response by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to Order No. 202-05-03 Response by PJM to letters from the City of...

376

Enforcement Letter, CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC - SEL-2012-01 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

M Oak Ridge, LLC - SEL-2012-01 M Oak Ridge, LLC - SEL-2012-01 Enforcement Letter, CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC - SEL-2012-01 May 4, 2012 Issued to URS CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC, related to a Security Incident involving the Protection and Control of Classified Information at the East Tennessee Technology Park The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has completed its evaluation of a security incident involving the protection and control of classified information at the East Tennessee Teclmology Park (ETTP) (Local Tracking System Report No. II-IOSC-0576-13). Based on this evaluation, the Department of Energy (DOE) identified concerns that warrant management attention by URS CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC (UCOR), the responsible contractor for ETTP. The specific concerns stem from the number of classified components that

377

The ATLAS b-Jet Trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The online event selection is crucial to reject most of the events containing uninteresting background collisions while preserving as much as possible the interesting physical signals. The b-jet selection is part of the trigger strategy of the ATLAS experiment and a set of dedicated triggers was contributing to the event selection for the 2011 running. The b-jets acceptance is increased and the background reduced by lowering jet transverse energy thresholds at the first trigger level and applying b-tagging techniques at the subsequent levels. Different physics channels, especially topologies containing more than one b-jet where higher rejection factors are achieved, benefit from using the b-jet trigger. An overview of the b-jet trigger menu and performance on data is presented.

Per Hansson

2011-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

378

A Novel in situ Trigger Combination Method  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Searches for rare physics processes using particle detectors in high-luminosity colliding hadronic beam environments require the use of multi-level trigger systems to reject colossal background rates in real time. In analyses like the search for the Higgs boson, there is a need to maximize the signal acceptance by combining multiple different trigger chains when forming the offline data sample. In such statistically limited searches, datasets are often amassed over periods of several years, during which the trigger characteristics evolve and their performance can vary significantly. Reliable production cross-section measurements and upper limits must take into account a detailed understanding of the effective trigger inefficiency for every selected candidate event. We present as an example the complex situation of three trigger chains, based on missing energy and jet energy, to be combined in the context of the search for the Higgs (H) boson produced in association with a W boson at the Collider Detector at F...

Buzatu, Adrian; Krumnack, Nils; Yao, Wei-Ming

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-14 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department reported its annual performance results in conjunction with its consolidated financial statements. Topic: Management and Administration Audit Letter Report:...

380

Joint Hydraulic Institute/ASAP Letter of March 30th - Clarification of Point #2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

We would like to clarify point #2 in the referenced letter, which addressed potential energy conservation standards for residential circulators.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Analysis of a 10-Percent RPS - Response letter summarizing principal conclusions of supplement  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

Transmittal letter for the supplement to the Service Report 'Analysis of a 10-Percent RenewablePortfolio Standard'

Alan Beamon

2003-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

382

Advice and recommendations to the US Department of Energy in response to the charge letter of September 20, 1996  

SciTech Connect

In Jan. 1996, the Fusion Energy Advisory Committee (FEAC) provided recommendations to DOE on how to restructure the fusion program in light of compressional guidance and budget realities. DOE endorsed these recommendations and prepared a strategic plan. The FEAC report concluded that the goals of the restructured program could most effectively be accomplished at a funding level of $275 million per year, including Federal government management costs. DOE requested that Congress appropriate $255.6 million in FY97 for the fusion energy sciences program exclusive of Federal government management costs (about $8 million). On Sept. 11, 1996, the Energy and Water Development Conference Committee settled on a FY97 appropriation for the fusion energy sciences program of $232.5 million. This report contains the response to the charge letter, on how the program described in the strategic plan could be changed to make it consistent with the $232.5 million appropriation.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

Time-triggered vs. event-triggered: A matter of configuration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Abstract. During the development of real-time systems one has either to plump for a time-triggered or an event-triggered architecture. Actually this decision deals with a non-functional property of a real-time system and should therefore be postponed as far as possible. Unfortunately, this property also exhibits functional qualities during the development of real-time systems making this postponement impossible and a subsequent transition very expensive. This paper sketches an approach to specify a real-time system independent of its architecture (timetriggered or event-triggered), thus facilitating to switch between a time-triggered and an event-triggered architecture easily. 1

Fabian Scheler; Wolfgang Schrder-preikschat

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Establishing Site X: Letter, Arthur H. Compton to Enrico Fermi, September 14, 1942  

DOE R&D Accomplishments (OSTI)

This letter from Compton to Fermi describes developments bearing on the establishment of site X (which, as of the letter date, is definitely determined as at the Tennessee Valley) for the construction of a pile and associated pilot plant buildings, describes the situation as of the letter date, and offers counsel as to how to proceed.

Compton, A. H.

1942-09-00T23:59:59.000Z

385

DOE Online  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

386

Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RE Docket No. EO-05-01 RE Docket No. EO-05-01 Letter from the Department of Energy to the District of Columbia Public Service Commission RE Docket No. EO-05-01 Docket No. EO-05-01. PEPCO has informed DOE that the first new 230 kV line is expected to be completed by June 2, 2007. The outage for the second new 230 kV line is expected to begin immediately following completion of the first line and is scheduled to last six days. Thus, both of the new lines should be complete by July 1,2007, the expiration date of the DOE Order. As DOE stated in Order No. 202-05-3, and reiterated in Order No. 202-07- 2, "once completed, [the new 230 kV transmission lines] apparently would provide a high level of electric reliability in the Cenlral D.C. area, even in the absence of production from the Plant." Therefore, the Department's

387

The D0 run II trigger system  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron was upgraded for Run II. This upgrade included improvements to the trigger system in order to be able to handle the increased Tevatron luminosity and higher bunch crossing rates compared to Run I. The D0 Run II trigger is a highly exible system to select events to be written to tape from an initial interaction rate of about 2.5 MHz. This is done in a three-tier pipelined, buffered system. The first tier (level 1) processes fast detector pick-off signals in a hardware/firmware based system to reduce the event rate to about 1. 5kHz. The second tier (level 2) uses information from level 1 and forms simple Physics objects to reduce the rate to about 850 Hz. The third tier (level 3) uses full detector readout and event reconstruction on a filter farm to reduce the rate to 20-30 Hz. The D0 trigger menu contains a wide variety of triggers. While the emphasis is on triggering on generic lepton and jet final states, there are also trigger terms for specific final state signatures. In this document we describe the D0 trigger system as it was implemented and is currently operating in Run II.

Schwienhorst, Reinhard; /Michigan State U.

2004-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

The ATLAS Trigger Menu: Design and Performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS trigger is a three-tiered system designed to select events of interest for the diverse ATLAS physics program such as Higgs Boson decays. At the same time the rate of events has to be reduced in order to stay within the limitations of available resources such as the output bandwidth, processing power and recording rate. At design capacity, the LHC has a bunch-crossing rate of 40 MHz whereas ATLAS detector has an average recording rate of about 300Hz. The decision to record an event is based on physics signatures found in the event such as energetic jets, leptons or large missing energy. The ATLAS trigger menu consists of several hundred trigger chains which are used during data taking. Each chain defines the selection criteria at each of the three trigger levels for a single physics signature. Additionally, the trigger menu specifies, depending on the physics purpose of the trigger, at which given rate the trigger is running. The continuously increasing luminosities together with optimisations of alg...

Bernius, C; The ATLAS collaboration

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Performance of the ATLAS trigger system  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS trigger has been used very successfully to collect collision data during 2009-2011 LHC running at centre of mass energies between 900 GeV and 7 TeV. The three-level trigger system reduces the event rate from the design bunch-crossing rate of 40 MHz to an average recording rate of about 300 Hz. The first level uses custom electronics to reject most background collisions, in less than 2.5 us, using information from the calorimeter and muon detectors. The upper two trigger levels are software-based triggers. The trigger system selects events by identifying signatures of muon, electron, photon, tau lepton, jet, and B meson candidates, as well as using global event signatures, such as missing transverse energy. We give an overview of the performance of these trigger selections based on extensive online running during the 2011 LHC run and discuss issues encountered during 2011 operations. Distributions of key selection variables are shown calculated at the different trigger levels and are compared with of...

Casadei, D; The ATLAS collaboration

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Final Letter to DOE Regulatory Burden 9_7_2012.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE STEVE NARDELLA President (Winchester Homes Inc.) RICK BAILEY Vice President/Calvert Co. (Marrick Properties) DOUG MEEKER Vice President/Charles Co. (Elm Street Development) ROBERT J. SPALDING Vice President/Mont. Co. (Miller & Smith Homes) HILLARY P.COLT Vice President/Prince George's Co. (Konterra) MIKE MUMMAUGH Vice President/St. Mary's Co. (Paragon Properties Inc.) BRIAN "A.J." JACKSON Vice President/Washington DC (EYA, LLC) FRANK BOSSONG, IV, P.E Associate Vice President (Rodgers Consulting Inc.) CLARK WAGNER Treasurer (Bozzuto Homes) DAVE LUNDEN Vice President, State Legis./Secretary (Timberlake Homes, Inc.) ROBERT R. HARRIS Life Director (Lerch, Early & Brewer Chtd.) MARTY MITCHELL Immediate Past President

391

Ex Parte Letter- Owens Corning Meeting August 29, 2013 DOE EERE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On Thursday, August 29, 2013, Julian Francis, VP & Managing Director Residential Insulation, Frank OBrien Bernini, VP & Chief Sustainability Officer, Paul Smith, VP Building Materials...

392

Microsoft Word - PoRiver Project Schedule - Letter to DOE_042807.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2007 30, 2007 Lawrence Mansueti Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy Rm. 8H-033 1000 Independence Avenue Washington, D.C. 20585 Re: Potomac River Project Outage Schedule Clarification Dear Mr. Mansueti: I am writing to clarify the upcoming outage schedule for the Potomac River project and to explain certain discrepancies that are present in Pepco's most recent communications. 1 The monthly status report submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") on April 16, 2007 shows the upcoming outages for the two additional transmission circuits as May 1, 2007 through May 21, 2007 (Circuit 1) and as May 24, 2007 through June 21, 2007 (Circuit 2). In an e-mail sent by Steve Alexander on April 27, 2007, Pepco reflected the current outage schedule for Circuit 1.

393

A Novel in situ Trigger Combination Method  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Searches for rare physics processes using particle detectors in high-luminosity colliding hadronic beam environments require the use of multi-level trigger systems to reject colossal background rates in real time. In analyses like the search for the Higgs boson, there is a need to maximize the signal acceptance by combining multiple different trigger chains when forming the offline data sample. In such statistically limited searches, datasets are often amassed over periods of several years, during which the trigger characteristics evolve and system performance can vary significantly. Reliable production cross-section measurements and upper limits must take into account a detailed understanding of the effective trigger inefficiency for every selected candidate event. We present as an example the complex situation of three trigger chains, based on missing energy and jet energy, that were combined in the context of the search for the Higgs (H) boson produced in association with a $W$ boson at the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF). We briefly review the existing techniques for combining triggers, namely the inclusion, division, and exclusion methods. We introduce and describe a novel fourth in situ method whereby, for each candidate event, only the trigger chain with the highest a priori probability of selecting the event is considered. We compare the inclusion and novel in situ methods for signal event yields in the CDF $WH$ search. This new combination method, by virtue of its scalability to large numbers of differing trigger chains and insensitivity to correlations between triggers, will benefit future long-running collider experiments, including those currently operating on the Large Hadron Collider.

Adrian Buzatu; Andreas Warburton; Nils Krumnack; Wei-Ming Yao

2012-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

394

Letter from Commonwealth to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide Letter from Commonwealth to Mirant Potomac River Concerning Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide Docket No. EO-05-01: Letter from Commonwealth of Virginia to Mirant Potomac River concerning Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide. Notification to Mirant by the Commonwealth of Virginia of Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide More Documents & Publications Notification to Mirant by the Commonwealth of Virginia of Serious Violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited

395

Enforcement Letter - Savannah River-07/21/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 1998 21, 1998 Mr. A. L. Schwallie [ ] Westinghouse Savannah River Company Building 703-A, P.O. Box 616 Road 1 Aiken, SC 29802 Subject: Enforcement Letter Incomplete Corrective Action for Noncompliance Report: NTS-SR--WSRC-SLDHZD-1996-0001 Dear Mr. Schwallie: The Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10) has received your letter dated June 30, 1998, Subject: Notification of Incomplete Corrective Action, in which you report that one corrective action for the above referenced NTS report was not completed and only partially implemented in the field. This action dealt with developing and implementing qualification standards for Generator Certification Officials and was reported by Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) as being completed June 30, 1997.

396

Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-02  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

\~ \~ , United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE. January 30, 2009 REPLY TO ATTNOF IG-40 sueJEcT Letter Report on "Questionable Purchases at the Hanford Site," INS-L-09-02, S09IS002 TO. Manager, Richland Operations Office Manager, Office of River Protection This letter report provides the results of an Office of Inspector General inspection of questionable purchases at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site (Hanford). During a review of the procurement card program at the Fluor Hanford Company (Fluor), we learned that Fluor and another Hanford prime contractor, CH2M Hill Hanford Company (CH2M Hill), had used Government funds to purchase overtime meals for employees. In addition, we learned Fluor had used Government funds to purchase gift items that were given away to

397

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory LLC- May 13, 2009 May 13, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to UT-Battelle, LLC related to a Radioactive Material Release at the Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement within the Office of Health, Safety and Security has conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2008-000 1, Operational Emergency at Building 6000, Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility. Our evaluation included a review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Management Investigation Team Report dated November 19, 2008, the associated corrective action plan,

398

Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - May 31, 2002 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- May 31, 2002 - May 31, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - May 31, 2002 May 31, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to UT-Battelle, LLC related to Unplanned Radiation Exposures at Oak Ridge National Laboratory The Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) has conducted a preliminary evaluation of the deficiencies described in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS-ORO--ORNL-X10PHYSICS-2002-0001. Our evaluation included review of the investigation report, associated corrective action plan, and discussion with site personnel. The subject NTS report described a series of deficiencies that resulted in several personnel being exposed to unanticipated radiation fields during the startup testing of an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) source at the

399

Enforcement Letter, Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 Enforcement Letter, Safety and Ecology Corporation - NEL-2011-04 October 24, 2011 Enforcement Letter issued to Safety and Ecology Corporation related to Two Radiological Contamination Events at the Separations Process Research Unit at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight conducted an evaluation of the two contamination events at the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) in Niskayuna, New York. On August 24, 2010, contaminated sludge leaked from two pumps inside the Building H2 Tank Farm Weather Enclosure after excessive pressure was applied to clear a clogged nozzle. The sludge contained radioisotopes from nuclear fuel reprocessing

400

November 28, 2005, Department letter forwarding the revision...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the focus of inany interactions between the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB). Key documents assessing these issues are DOE'S...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

The new UA1 calorimeter trigger processor  

SciTech Connect

The UA1 First Level Trigger Processor (TP) is a fast digital machine with a highly parallel pipelined architecture of fast TTL combinational and programmable logic controlled by programmable microsequencers. The TP uses 100,000 IC's housed in 18 crates each containing 21 fastbus sized modules. It is hardwired with a very high level of interconnection. The energy deposited in the upgraded calorimeter is digitised into 1700 bytes of input data every beam crossing. The Processor selects in 1.5 microseconds events for further processing. The new electron trigger has improved hadron jet rejection, achieved by requiring low energy deposition around the electro-magnetic cluster. A missing transverse energy trigger and a total energy trigger have also been implemented.

Baird, S.A.; Campbell, D.; Cawthraw, M.; Coughlan, J.; Flynn, P.; Galagadera, S.; Grayer, G.; Halsall, R.; Shah, T.P.; Stephens, R.

1989-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Performance of the CMS Level-1 Trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The first level trigger of the CMS experiment is comprised of custom electronics that process data from the electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters and three technologies of muon detectors in order to select the most interesting events from LHC collisions, such as those consistent with the production and decay of the Higgs boson. The rate of events selected by this Level-1 trigger must be reduced from the beam crossing frequency to no more than 100 kHz further processing can occur, a major challenge since the LHC instantaneous luminosity has increased by six orders of magnitude since the start of operations to more than 6E33 cm-2s-1 today. The performance of the Level-1 trigger, in terms of rates and efficiencies of the main objects and trigger algorithms, as measured from LHC proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV center-of-mass energies is presented here.

J. Brooke; on behalf of the CMS Collaboration

2013-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

403

A configuration system for the ATLAS trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

will be exposed to proton-proton collisions from beams crossing at 40 MHz that have to be reduced to the few 100 Hz allowed by the storage systems. A three-level trigger system has been designed to achieve this goal. We describe the configuration system under construction for the ATLAS trigger chain. It provides the trigger system with all the parameters required for decision taking and to record its history. The same system configures the event reconstruction, Monte Carlo simulation and data analysis, and provides tools for accessing and manipulating the configuration data in all contexts. THE ATLAS TRIGGER The LHC proton bunches will cross at a frequency of approximately 40 MHz. The rate of events that can be committed to permanent storage in normal data taking is only

unknown authors

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Developments of the ATLAS Jet Trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

There have been a lot of recent changes in the ATLAS jet trigger. The standard strategy, based on Regions Of Interest, is not well-suited for multi-jet events since it leads to pathologies and efficiency losses. This philosophy has been changed for the jet trigger, and we now have the possibility of unpacking the full calorimeter at Event Filter and (even for a small subset of the events) at an intermediate level between Level-1 and Level-2. We also moved to the use of calibrated scale at trigger level, and to the application of noise cuts to reduce rate spikes. We will present the performance of the jet trigger in 2011, when most of these changes were operational

Lopes, L; The ATLAS collaboration

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Performance of the CMS Level-1 Trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The first level trigger of the CMS experiment is comprised of custom electronics that process data from the electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters and three technologies of muon detectors in order to select the most interesting events from LHC collisions, such as those consistent with the production and decay of the Higgs boson. The rate of events selected by this Level-1 trigger must be reduced from the beam crossing frequency to no more than 100 kHz further processing can occur, a major challenge since the LHC instantaneous luminosity has increased by six orders of magnitude since the start of operations to more than 6E33 cm-2s-1 today. The performance of the Level-1 trigger, in terms of rates and efficiencies of the main objects and trigger algorithms, as measured from LHC proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV center-of-mass energies is presented here.

Brooke, J

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Performance of the ATLAS Jet Trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

There have been a lot of recent changes in the ATLAS jet trigger. The standard strategy, based on Regions Of Interest, is not well-suited for multi-jet events since it leads to pathologies and efficiency losses. This philosophy has been changed for the jet trigger, and we now have the possibility of unpacking the full calorimeter at Event Filter and (even for a small subset of the events) at an intermediate level between Level-1 and Level-2. We also moved to the use of calibrated scale at trigger level, and to the application of noise cuts to reduce rate spikes. We will present the performance of the jet trigger in 2011, when most of these changes were operational

Lopes, L; The ATLAS collaboration

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

mate how such small events trigger others. O n average theany earthquake can trigger other events with a rate whicha mainshock triggers a larger event, most of the following

Helmstetter, Agnes; Kagan, Yan Y; Jackson, David D

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Commissioning of the CMS High Level Trigger  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CMS experiment will collect data from the proton-proton collisions delivered by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at a centre-of-mass energy up to 14 TeV. The CMS trigger system is designed to cope with unprecedented luminosities and LHC bunch-crossing rates up to 40 MHz. The unique CMS trigger architecture only employs two trigger levels. The Level-1 trigger is implemented using custom electronics, while the High Level Trigger (HLT) is based on software algorithms running on a large cluster of commercial processors, the Event Filter Farm. We present the major functionalities of the CMS High Level Trigger system as of the starting of LHC beams operations in September 2008. The validation of the HLT system in the online environment with Monte Carlo simulated data and its commissioning during cosmic rays data taking campaigns are discussed in detail. We conclude with the description of the HLT operations with the first circulating LHC beams before the incident occurred the 19th September 2008.

Agostino, L.; /Cornell U., Phys. Dept.; Bauer, G.; /MIT, LNS; Beccati, B.; /CERN; Behrens, U.; /DESY; Berryhil, J.; Biery, K.; /Fermilab; Bose, T.; /Boston U.; Brett, A.; /Fermilab; Branson, J.; /UC, San Diego; Cano, E.; /CERN; Cheung, H.; /Fermilab /CERN /LLNL, Livermore /Minnesota U.

2009-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

The ATLAS Trigger Performance and Evolution  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

During the data taking period from 2009 until 2012, the ATLAS trigger has been very successfully used to collect proton-proton data at LHC centre-of-mass energies between 900 GeV and 8 TeV at record breaking luminosities. The three?level trigger system reduces the event rate from the design bunch?crossing rate of 40 MHz to an average recording rate of about 300 Hz. Using custom electronics with input from the calorimeter and muon detectors, the first level rejects most background collisions in less than 2.5 ?s. Then follow two levels of software?based triggers. The trigger system is designed to select events by identifying muons, electrons, photons, taus, jets, and B hadron candidates, as well as using global event signatures, such as missing transverse energy. We give an overview of the strategy and performance of the different trigger selections during the 2011-2012 run. We also discuss the trigger evolution and redesign put in place to cope with the continuously rising luminosity and in particular t...

Bartsch, V; The ATLAS collaboration

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

410

The ALICE electromagnetic calorimeter high level triggers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment) detector yields a huge sample of data from different sub-detectors. On-line data processing is applied to select and reduce the volume of the stored data. ALICE applies a multi-level hardware trigger scheme where fast detectors are used to feed a three-level (L0, L1, and L2) deep chain. The High-Level Trigger (HLT) is a fourth filtering stage sitting logically between the L2 trigger and the data acquisition event building. The EMCal detector comprises a large area electromagnetic calorimeter that extends the momentum measurement of photons and neutral mesons up to $p_T=250$ GeV/c, which improves the ALICE capability to perform jet reconstruction with measurement of the neutral energy component of jets. An online reconstruction and trigger chain has been developed within the HLT framework to sharpen the EMCal hardware triggers, by combining the central barrel tracking information with the shower reconstruction (clusters) in the calorimeter. In the present report the status and the functionality of the software components developed for the EMCal HLT online reconstruction and trigger chain will be discussed, as well as preliminary results from their commissioning performed during the 2011 LHC running period.

F. Ronchetti; F. Blanco; M. Figueredo; A. G. Knospe; L. Xaplanteris for the ALICE HLT Collaboration

2012-09-17T23:59:59.000Z

411

Microsoft Word - S04902_LetterReport Cover Letter.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

2 2 Control Number 09-0301 December 15, 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management ATTN: Jack Craig Site Manager 3600 Collins Ferry Road Morgantown, WV 26505 SUBJECT: Rulison Long-Term Hydrologic Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Results for 2008 Dear Mr. Craig: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management conducted annual sampling at the Rulison, Colorado site, for the Long-Term Hydrologic Monitoring Program (LTHMP) on May 12, and 13, 2008. Samples were analyzed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Radiation & Indoor Environments National Laboratory in Las Vegas, Nevada. Samples were analyzed for gamma-emitting radionuclides by high-resolution gamma spectroscopy and tritium using the conventional and enriched methods.

412

Preparing a DOE SBIR/STTR Phase I Grant Application | U.S. DOE Office of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a DOE SBIR/STTR Phase I Grant Application a DOE SBIR/STTR Phase I Grant Application Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) SBIR/STTR Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Applicant and Awardee Resources Preparing and Submitting a Phase I Letter of Intent Preparing a DOE SBIR/STTR Phase I Grant Application Useful Documents for Awardees Commercialization Assistance Other Resources Awards SBIR/STTR Highlights Reporting Fraud Contact Information Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer U.S. Department of Energy SC-29/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-5707 F: (301) 903-5488 E: sbir-sttr@science.doe.gov More Information » Applicant and Awardee Resources Preparing a DOE SBIR/STTR Phase I Grant Application

413

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT FOR A FAST MUON TRIGGER  

SciTech Connect

This document is a Conceptual Design Report for a fast muon trigger for the PHENIX experiment that will enable the study of flavor separated quark and anti-quark spin polarizations in the proton. A powerful way of measuring these polarizations is via single spin asymmetries for W boson production in polarized proton-proton reactions. The measurement is done by tagging W{sup +} and W{sup -} via their decay into high transverse momentum leptons in the forward directions. The PHENIX experiment is capable of measuring high momentum muons at forward rapidity, but the current online trigger does not have sufficient rejection to sample the rare leptons fromW decay at the highest luminosities at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). This Report details the goals, design, R&D, and schedule for building new detectors and trigger electronics to use the full RHIC luminosity to make this critical measurement. The idea for W boson measurements in polarized proton-proton collisions at RHIC was first suggested by Jacques Soffer and Claude Bourrely in 1995. This prompted the RIKEN institute in Japan to supply funds to build a second muon arm for PHENIX (south muon arm). The existence of both a north and south muon arm makes it possible to utilize a Z{sup 0} sample to study and control systematic uncertainties which arise in the reconstruction of high momentum muons. This document has its origins in recommendations made by a NSAC Subcommittee that reviewed the U.S. Heavy Ion Physics Program in June 2004. Part of their Recommendation 1 was to 'Invest in near-term detector upgrades of the two large experiments, PHENIX and STAR'. In Recommendation 2 the subcommittee stated '- detector improvements proceed at a rate that allows a timely determination of the flavor dependence of the quark-antiquark sea polarization through W-asymmetry measurements' as we are proposing here. On September 13, 2004 DOE requested from BNL a report articulating a research plan for the RHIC spin physics program. The document was submitted to DOE on January 31, 2005. It pointed out that one of three top priorities for the program lies in the clean and elegant measurement of the quark and anti-quark polarizations sorted by quark flavor through the parity-violating production of W bosons.

OBRIEN,E.; BASYE, A.; ISENHOWER, D.; JUMPER, D.; SPARKS, N.; TOWELL, R.; WATTS, C.; WOOD, J.; WRIGHT, R.; HAGGERTY, J.; LYNCH, D.; BARISH, K.; EYSER, K.O.; SETO, R.; HU, S.; LI, X.; ZHOU, S.; GLENN, A.; KINNEY, E.; KIRILUK, K.; NAGLE, J.; CHI, C.Y.; SIPPACH, W.; ZAJC. W.; BUTLER, C.; HE, X.; OAKLEY, C.; YING, J.; BLACKBURN, J.; CHIU, M.; PERDEKAMP, M.G.; KIM, Y.J.; KOSTER, J.; LAYTON, D.; MAKINS, N.; MEREDITH, B.; NORTHACKER, D.; PENG, J.-C.; SEIDL, R.; THORSLAND, E.; WADHAMS, S.; WILLIAMSON, S.; YANG, R.; HILL, J.; KEMPEL, T.; LAJOIE, J.; SLEEGE, G.; VALE, C.; WEI, F.; SAITO, N.; HONG, B.; KIM, B.; LEE, K.; LEE, K.S.; PARK, S.; SIM, K.-S.; AOKI, K.; DAIRAKU, S.; IMAI, K.; KARATSU, K.; MURAKAMI, T.; SATO, A.; SENZAKA, K.; SHOJI, K.; TANIDA, K.; BROOKS, M.; LEITCH, M.; ADAMS, J.; CARINGI, A.; FADEM, B.; IDE, J.; LICHTENWALNER, P.; FIELDS, D.; MAO, Y.; HAN, R.; BUNCE, G.; XIE, W.; FUKAO, Y.; TAKETANI, A.; KURITA, K.; MURATA, J.; (PHENIX COLLABORATION)

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

A Gamma-Ray Burst Trigger Toolkit  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The detection rate of a gamma-ray burst detector can be increased by using a count rate trigger with many accumulation times ?t and energy bands ?E. Because a bursts peak flux varies when averaged over different ?t and ?E, the nominal sensitivity (the numerical value of the peak flux) of a trigger system is less important than how much fainter a burst could be at the detection threshold as ?t and ?E are changed. The relative sensitivity of different triggers can be quantified by referencing the detection threshold back to the peak flux for a fiducial value of ?t and ?E. This mapping between peak flux values for different sets of ?t and ?E varies from burst to burst. Quantitative estimates of the burst detection rate for a given detector and trigger system can be based on the observed rate at a measured peak flux value in this fiducial trigger. Predictions of a proposed triggers burst detection rate depend on the assumed burst population, and these predictions can be wildly in error for triggers that differ significantly from previous missions. I base the fiducial rate on the BATSE observations: 550 bursts per sky above a peak flux of 0.3 ph cm ?2 s ?1 averaged over ?t=1.024 s and ?E=50300 keV. Using a sample of 100 burst lightcurves I find that triggering on all possible values of ?t that are multiples of 0.064 s decreases the average threshold peak flux on the 1.024 s timescale by a factor of 0.6. Extending ?E to lower energies includes the large flux of the X-ray background, increasing the background count rate. Consequently a low energy ?E is advantageous only for very soft bursts. Whether a large fraction of the population of bright bursts is soft is disputed; the new population of X-ray Flashes is soft but relatively faint. Subject headings: gamma-rays: bursts

unknown authors

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Tau Trigger at the ATLAS Experiment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Many theoretical models, like the Standard Model or SUSY at large tan({beta}), predict Higgs bosons or new particles which decay more abundantly to final states including tau leptons than to other leptons. At the energy scale of the LHC, the identification of tau leptons, in particular in the hadronic decay mode, will be a challenging task due to an overwhelming QCD background which gives rise to jets of particles that can be hard to distinguish from hadronic tau decays. Equipped with excellent tracking and calorimetry, the ATLAS experiment has developed tau identification tools capable of working at the trigger level. This contribution presents tau trigger algorithms which exploit the main features of hadronic tau decays and describes the current tau trigger commissioning activities. Many of the SM processes being investigated at ATLAS, as well as numerous BSM searches, contain tau leptons in their final states. Being able to trigger effectively on the tau leptons in these events will contribute to the success of the ATLAS experiment. The tau trigger algorithms and monitoring infrastructure are ready for the first data, and are being tested with the data collected with cosmic muons. The development of efficiency measurements methods using QCD and Z {yields} {tau}{tau} events is well advanced.

Benslama, K.; Kalinowski, A.; /Regina U.; Belanger-Champange, C.; Brenner, R.; /Uppsala U.; Bosman, M.; Casado, P.; Osuna, C.; Perez, E.; Vorwerk, V.; /Barcelona, IFAE; Czyczula, Z.; Dam, M.; Xella, S.; /Copenhagen U.; Demers, S.; /SLAC; Farrington, S.; /Oxford U.; Igonkina, O.; /NIKHEF, Amsterdam; Kanaya, N.; Tsuno, S.; /Tokyo U.; Ptacek, E.; Reinsch, A.; Strom, David M.; Torrence, E.; /Oregon U. /Sydney U. /Lancaster U. /Birmingham U.

2011-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

416

DOE-2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

standards in the U.S. and other countries. DOE-2 is also the basis of numerous handbooks on energy-efficient buildings and building components. Many design and consulting...

417

DOE017-0153  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

418

July 30, 2009, Board letter forwarding Recommendation 2009-1...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

does not include information restricted by DOE under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,42 U.S.C. 9 2161-2168, as amended, please arrange to have it placed promptly on file...

419

March 29, 2002, DNFSB letter enclosing comments on the Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

In the mid- 199Os, DOE and its contractors undertook a major effort to change the fundamental structure of DOE's Safety Directives System to reduce the system's burden and...

420

BTeV trigger/DAQ innovations  

SciTech Connect

BTeV was a proposed high-energy physics (HEP) collider experiment designed for the study of B-physics and CP Violation at the Tevatron at Fermilab. BTeV included a large-scale, high-speed trigger and data acquisition (DAQ) system, reading data from the detector at 500 Gbytes/sec and writing data to mass storage at a rate of 200 Mbytes/sec. The design of the trigger/DAQ system was innovative while remaining realistic in terms of technical feasibility, schedule and cost. This paper will give an overview of the BTeV trigger/DAQ architecture, highlight some of the technical challenges, and describe the approach that was used to solve these challenges.

Votava, Margaret; /Fermilab

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Combining Triggers in HEP Data Analysis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Modern high-energy physics experiments collect data using dedicated complex multi-level trigger systems which perform an online selection of potentially interesting events. In general, this selection suffers from inefficiencies. A further loss of statistics occurs when the rate of accepted events is artificially scaled down in order to meet bandwidth constraints. An offline analysis of the recorded data must correct for the resulting losses in order to determine the original statistics of the analysed data sample. This is particularly challenging when data samples recorded by several triggers are combined. In this paper we present methods for the calculation of the offline corrections and study their statistical performance. Implications on building and operating trigger systems are discussed.

Victor Lendermann; Johannes Haller; Michael Herbst; Katja Krueger; Hans-Christian Schultz-Coulon; Rainer Stamen

2009-01-27T23:59:59.000Z

422

Combining Triggers in HEP Data Analysis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Modern high-energy physics experiments collect data using dedicated complex multi-level trigger systems which perform an online selection of potentially interesting events. In general, this selection suffers from inefficiencies. A further loss of statistics occurs when the rate of accepted events is artificially scaled down in order to meet bandwidth constraints. An offline analysis of the recorded data must correct for the resulting losses in order to determine the original statistics of the analysed data sample. This is particularly challenging when data samples recorded by several triggers are combined. In this paper we present methods for the calculation of the offline corrections and study their statistical performance. Implications on building and operating trigger systems are discussed.

Lendermann, Victor; Herbst, Michael; Krueger, Katja; Schultz-Coulon, Hans-Christian; Stamen, Rainer

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.11 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter 1 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter < GRR‎ | Elements Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections 14-CA-c.11 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter The DOGGR State Board prepares an Updated Draft Project Approval Letter, reflecting the the public comments and Regional Board' proposed revisions. Logic Chain No Parents \V/ GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.11 - Updated Draft Project Approval Letter (this page) \V/ No Dependents Under Development Add.png Add an Element Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.11_-_Updated_Draft_Project_Approval_Letter&oldid=539626" Categories: Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Elements Under Development What links here Related changes

424

Microsoft Word - Final Report Package Transmittal - FY 2010 FS Management Letter.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: December 20, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-322 (A10FN006) SUBJECT: Management Letter on the Audit of the Department of Energy's Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2010 TO: Chief Financial Officer, CF-1 Attached is the subject letter prepared by KPMG LLP, our contract auditors. The letter contains 23 new findings (see letter, Exhibit A) and 4 repeat findings (see letter, Exhibit B) that were issued during the course of the Fiscal Year 2010 audit of the Department of Energy's (Department) Consolidated Financial Statements. Management generally concurred with and provided planned corrective actions for most of the recommendations listed in the Management Letter and management's comments are included in each finding.

425

The CMS High-Level Trigger  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At the startup of the LHC, the CMS data acquisition is expected to be able to sustain an event readout rate of up to 100 kHz from the Level-1 trigger. These events will be read into a large processor farm which will run the 'High-Level Trigger'(HLT) selection algorithms and will output a rate of about 150 Hz for permanent data storage. In this report HLT performances are shown for selections based on muons, electrons, photons, jets, missing transverse energy, {tau} leptons and b quarks: expected efficiencies, background rates and CPU time consumption are reported as well as relaxation criteria foreseen for a LHC startup instantaneous luminosity.

Covarelli, R. [CERN, Geneva 1211 (Switzerland)

2009-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

426

Development and Online Opertation of Minimum Bias Triggers in ATLAS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The design of minimum bias triggers should allow for a highly efficient selection on pp-collisions, while minimising any possible bias in the event selection. In ATLAS two main minimum bias triggers have been developed using complementary technologies. A hardware based first level trigger, consisting of 32 plastic scintillators, has proven to efficienctly select pp-interactions. In particular during the start-up phase this trigger played a crucial role for the commissioning of the central trigger processor and detector sub-systems. A complementary selection is achieved by a multi-level minimum bias trigger, seeded off a random trigger on filled bunches. For the event selection at higher trigger levels a dedicated algorithm was developed, able to cope with around 86 millions of detector signals per bunch-crossing. We will present these trigger systems and their deployment online, highlighting their performance and trigger efficiencies. We outline as well the operation with increasing beam intensities and lumin...

Martin, T; The ATLAS collaboration

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Letter from the Chairman of the Board of Lincoln County Commissioners...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments Concerning the Continuation or Modification of the Provisions of the Price-Anderson Act Letter from the Chairman of the Board of Lincoln County Commissioners...

428

Letters of Interest PRICE/COST Estimate Sheet for [Insert LOI...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(Typed Name) NREL Form (10-5-2000) Letters of Interest PRICECOST Estimate Sheet for Description Base Year Phase Option Year I Phase Option Year...

429

Microsoft Word - AL 2010-07 Acquistion Letters Remaining in Effect...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, andor...

430

Conceptual design letter report for project W-454, AW jumper manifold upgrade  

SciTech Connect

This Conceptual Design Letter Report provides details on the activities required to be performed for this project and also provides cost estimates and schedules for those activities.

Mattichak, R.W., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

431

LA-UR-07-6494 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LA-UR-07-6494 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA-6494 An Equal Opportunity Employer / Operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA · Homeland by Los Alamos National Security LLC for DOE/NNSA Your Letter of Interest should include the following

432

DOE HANDBOOK  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

433

Multiple output timing and trigger generator  

SciTech Connect

In support of the development of a multiple stage pulse modulator at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, we have developed a first generation, multiple output timing and trigger generator. Exploiting Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Micro Controller Units (MCU's), the timing and trigger generator provides 32 independent outputs with a timing resolution of about 500 ns. The timing and trigger generator system is comprised of two MCU boards and a single PC. One of the MCU boards performs the functions of the timing and signal generation (the timing controller) while the second MCU board accepts commands from the PC and provides the timing instructions to the timing controller. The PC provides the user interface for adjusting the on and off timing for each of the output signals. This system provides 32 output or timing signals which can be pre-programmed to be in an on or off state for each of 64 time steps. The width or duration of each of the 64 time steps is programmable from 2 {micro}s to 2.5 ms with a minimum time resolution of 500 ns. The repetition rate of the programmed pulse train is only limited by the time duration of the programmed event. This paper describes the design and function of the timing and trigger generator system and software including test results and measurements.

Wheat, Robert M. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Dale, Gregory E [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Event Reconstruction Algorithms for the ATLAS Trigger  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The ATLAS experiment under construction at CERN is due to begin operation at the end of 2007. The detector will record the results of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 14 TeV. The trigger is a three-tier system designed to identify in real-time potentially interesting events that are then saved for detailed offline analysis. The trigger system will select approximately 200 Hz of potentially interesting events out of the 40 MHz bunch-crossing rate (with 10{sup 9} interactions per second at the nominal luminosity). Algorithms used in the trigger system to identify different event features of interest will be described, as well as their expected performance in terms of selection efficiency, background rejection and computation time per event. The talk will concentrate on recent improvements and on performance studies, using a very detailed simulation of the ATLAS detector and electronics chain that emulates the raw data as it will appear at the input to the trigger system.

Fonseca-Martin, T.; /CERN; Abolins, M.; /Michigan State U.; Adragna, P.; /Queen Mary, U. of London; Aleksandrov, E.; /Dubna, JINR; Aleksandrov, I.; /Dubna, JINR; Amorim, A.; /Lisbon, LIFEP; Anderson, K.; /Chicago U., EFI; Anduaga, X.; /La Plata U.; Aracena, I.; /SLAC; Asquith, L.; /University Coll. London; Avolio, G.; /CERN; Backlund, S.; /CERN; Badescu, E.; /Bucharest, IFIN-HH; Baines, J.; /Rutherford; Barria, P.; /Rome U. /INFN, Rome; Bartoldus, R.; /SLAC; Batreanu, S.; /Bucharest, IFIN-HH /CERN; Beck, H.P.; /Bern U.; Bee, C.; /Marseille, CPPM; Bell, P.; /Manchester U.; Bell, W.H.; /Glasgow U. /Pavia U. /INFN, Pavia /Regina U. /CERN /Annecy, LAPP /Paris, IN2P3 /Royal Holloway, U. of London /Napoli Seconda U. /INFN, Naples /Argonne /CERN /UC, Irvine /Barcelona, IFAE /Barcelona, Autonoma U. /CERN /Montreal U. /CERN /Glasgow U. /Michigan State U. /Bucharest, IFIN-HH /Napoli Seconda U. /INFN, Naples /New York U. /Barcelona, IFAE /Barcelona, Autonoma U. /Salento U. /INFN, Lecce /Pisa U. /INFN, Pisa /Bucharest, IFIN-HH /UC, Irvine /CERN /Glasgow U. /INFN, Genoa /Genoa U. /Lisbon, LIFEP /Napoli Seconda U. /INFN, Naples /UC, Irvine /Valencia U. /Rio de Janeiro Federal U. /University Coll. London /New York U.; /more authors..

2011-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

435

ALICE Trigger and Event Selection QA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I will present the last nine weeks of work on building a class that efficiently produces trending physics selection of various trigger classes for the purposes of quality assurance. This class is easily generalizable and will be used for live monitoring via a webpage.

CERN. Geneva

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

ATLAS trigger for first physics and beyond  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ATLAS is a multi-purpose spectrometer built to perform precision measurements of Standard Model parameters and is aiming at discovery of Higgs particle, Super Symmetry and possible other physics channels beyond Standard Model. Operating at 14 TeV center of mass energy ATLAS will see 40 million events per second at nominal luminosity with about 25 overlapping interactions. Most of the events are inelastic proton-proton interactions with only few W, Z bosons or ttbar pairs produced each second, and expectations for Higgs or SUSY production cross-section are much smaller than that. ATLAS trigger has a difficult task to select one out of $10^5$ events online and to ensure that most physics channels of interests are preserved for analysis. In this talk we will review the design of ATLAS trigger system, the trigger menu prepared for initial LHC run as well as for high luminosity run. The expected trigger performance of the base-line ATLAS physics programs will be reviewed and first results from the commissioning pe...

Fonseca-Martin, T

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Triggering of Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes: PMT trigger rates due to night-sky photons  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Imaging air Cherenkov telescopes are usually triggered on a coincidence of two or sometimes more pixels, with discriminator thresholds in excess of 20 photoelectrons applied for each pixel. These thresholds required to suppress night-sky background are significantly higher than expected on the basis of a Poisson distribution in the number of night-sky photoelectrons generated during the characteristic signal integration time. We studied noise trigger rates under controlled conditions using an artificial background light source. Large tails in the PMT amplitude response to single photoelectrons are identified as a dominant contribution to noise triggers. The rate of such events is very sensitive to PMT operating parameters.

G. Hermann; C. Khler; T. Kutter; W. Hofmann

1995-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

438

DOE Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

439

DOE Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

440

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Appendix G: Responses to U.S. Department of Energy Letters to State Agencies and Native American Groups  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS RESPONSES TO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LETTERS TO STATE AGENCIES AND NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS Consultation Letters G-32 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-33 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-34 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-35 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-36 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-37 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-38 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-39 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-40 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-41 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters G-42 Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS Consultation Letters

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Commissioning of the calorimetry in the ATLAS tau trigger system  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Calorimeters are fundamental in the three levels of the ATLAS tau trigger system. The first level trigger (L1) uses the electromagnetic (e.m.) and hadronic (had) calorimeters to make its decision. In the High Level Triggers (HLT), these systems are also crucial: both the second level trigger (L2) and the third level trigger (Event Filter -EF) heavily exploit the calorimeter based information to identify tau leptons decaying hadronically. Whilst the granularity of the first level is coarse, the second and third level triggers have the final full detector read-out. This contribution focuses on the commissioning of the calorimetry in the three levels of the tau trigger in real data. Efficiency measurements with respect to tau candidates reconstructed by the offline algorithms, and distributions of calorimeter based tau information reconstructed at trigger level, are compared to prediction of the Monte Carlo and the trigger performance in first data assessed.

Sfyrla, Anna; The ATLAS collaboration

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Commissioning of the calorimetry in the ATLAS tau trigger system  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Calorimeters are fundamental in the three levels of the ATLAS tau trigger system. The first level trigger (L1) uses the electromagnetic (EM) and hadronic (HAD) calorimeters to make its decision. In the High Level Triggers (HLT), these systems are also crucial: both the second level trigger (L2) and the third level trigger (Event Filter -EF) heavily exploit the calorimeter based information to identify tau leptons decaying hadronically. Whilst the granularity of the first level is coarse, the second and third level triggers have the final full detector read-out. This contribution focuses on the commissioning of the calorimetry in the three levels of the tau trigger in real data. Efficiency measurements with respect to tau candidates reconstructed by the offline algorithms, and distributions of calorimeter based tau information reconstructed at trigger level, are compared to prediction of the Monte Carlo and the trigger performance in first data assessed.

Sfyrla, Anna; The ATLAS collaboration

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Performance study of the level-1 di-muon trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

An event with two muons in the final state is a distinctive signal and can be triggered efficiently with the use of the level-1 di-muon trigger. Nevertheless triggering is still an issue if these muon tracks are fairly soft and fake di-muon triggers originating from muons that traverse more than one region of the trigger chambers increase the trigger rate. It is important to provide an acceptable trigger rate, while keeping high trigger efficiency to study low-pt $B$-physics such as rare $B$ hadron decays or CP violation in the $B$-events, especially in a multi-purpose experiment like ATLAS. In this note, the level-1 di-muon trigger and its expected performance are described.

The ATLAS Collaboration

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

Enforcement Letter, WEL-2011-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-01 1-01 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2011-01 October 24, 2011 Issued to Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC, related to a Worker Injury that occurred during Tree Cutting Operations at the Brookhaven National Laboratory The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated a worker injury that occurred at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) on March 3, 2011, when a BNL building and grounds utility worker was cutting a tree with a chainsaw while elevated 20 feet above ground in an aerial lift. An approximately eight foot long, 18-inch diameter, 520-pound section of tree trunk fell unexpectedly toward the worker and compressed the worker's right arm against the top railing of the aerial lift basket. The worker underwent surgery for the injuries, was hospitalized for more

445

Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE March 16. 2009 DATE March 16. 2009 REPLY TO ATTN OF. IG-40 SUBJECT Letter Report on "Y- 12 National Security Complex Accountable Classified Removable Electronic Media Program," INS-L-09-03 (S091S008) TO Manager, Y-12 Site Ortice This is to advise you of the results of an Office of Inspector General inspection 01 accountable classified removable electronic media (ACREM) at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12). BACKGROUND Y-12 is responsible Cor ensuring the safety and reliability of the Nation's nuclear weapon stockpile and handles and stores some of the Nation's most sensitive information. Y-12 is managed and operated by Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Y- 12, LLC, and the Y-12 Site Ocfice oversees this contract.

446

Letter Report: INS-L-09-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wasi-lington, DC 20585 Wasi-lington, DC 20585 M E . h ~ l O ~ W ~ h ~ FC)XX. 'Hr.I&;<4.CTwpEf UTY SECRETARY S IJX33ECIT: IXFBWMAJllj: Letter Report on 1nspecti.on of "Depament of Ex~ergy ~itivities hvolving the 'President's Surveillance Program" (INS-L-09-01, in spec ti ax^ No. SOSHSO12) 'X'he Foreign Intelligeiice Su~-%leilBanc,x Act of 1978 (Act), ameridetl on July 10, 2008, requireti Lktt Intelligence Community Inspectors Generd retriew specified aspects c 9 f their respective agencies' parti.cipati.on in the President's Surveillance Program. The Act defined the Program as "the inteBllgen.ce activity inarolving :comuralcations that was authorized by the I>resider~t during the period beginniilg on September 1 I, 2001, w.d endirrg on Jmuay 17, 2007.9' The Depmx~eni

447

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2012-01 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-01 2-01 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2012-01 February 28, 2012 Issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, related to a positive Unreviewed Safety Question involving the Tank Farm Waste Transfer System at the Hanford Site The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight evaluated a positive Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) identified by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) involving a discrepancy in the Tank Farm waste transfer system design temperature, unanalyzed freezing during active waste transfer, and unanalyzed potential failure of relief valves due to solids precipitation. WRPS concluded that the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (AS ME) code B31.3 analysis of the safety significant waste transfer piping for

448

Audit Letter Report: INS-L-07-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy memorandum DATE February 2, 2007 REPLY TO A T ~ N O F IG-40 SUBJECT: Letter Report on "Alleged Loss or Theft of Personally Identifiable Infonnation at Pantex," INS-L-07-05 (S06IS037) TO. Manager, Pailtex Site Office This is to advise you of the results of an Office of Inspector General (OIG) inspection of an alleged loss or theft of personally identifiable information at the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA's) Pantex Plant. BACKGROUND Under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as amended by the Immigration and Nationality Act, all United States (U.S.) employers are required to obtain and retain information concerning each employee's eligibility to work in the U.S. The information to be collected generally consists of the employee's social security number, address, date of

449

MULTIPLE LETTERS Mr. James Speir, Vice President Phosphate Operations  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

52. 52. APR 9 1986 MULTIPLE LETTERS Mr. James Speir, Vice President Phosphate Operations International Minerals and Chemical Corporation P.O. Box 7047 Lakeland, Florida 33807 Dear Mr. Speir: The Department of Energy is evaluating the radiological condition of sites that were utilized by the Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) during the early years of nuclear energy development to determine whether they need remedial action and whether the Department has authority to perform such action. As you may be aware through previous correspondence, the International Minerals and Chemical Corporation facility in Mulberry, Florida, was identified as one such site, as a result of some research, development, and pilot plant work conducted at the

450

Letter Report on Metallurgical Examination of the High Fluence RPV  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Metallurgical Examination of the High Fluence RPV Report on Metallurgical Examination of the High Fluence RPV Specimens From the Ringhals Nuclear Reactors Letter Report on Metallurgical Examination of the High Fluence RPV Specimens From the Ringhals Nuclear Reactors Regulations which govern the operation of commercial nuclear power plants require conservative margins of fracture toughness, both during normal operation and under accident scenarios. In the irradiated condition, the fracture toughness of the RPV may be severely degraded, with the degree of toughness loss dependent on the radiation sensitivity of the materials. As stated in previous progress reports, the available embrittlement predictive models, e.g. [1], and our present understanding of radiation damage are not fully quantitative, and do not treat all potentially significant variables

451

Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-02 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-02 February 12, 2013 The Office of Health, Safety and Security' s Office of Enforcement and Oversight conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) described in the Los A lamos National Security, LLC (LANS) Noncomplia nce Tracking System (NTS) report NTS --LASO-LANS-LANL-2012-0018, LANSCE Contamination Event, dated September 10, 2012. Our evaluation included a review of the Federal accident investigation report, Accident Investigation into Contamination at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center on or about August 21, 2012, dated September 2012; the associated corrective action plan; and discussions with site personnel. The NTS report documents a series of deficiencies at LANSCE that resulted

452

November 21, 2006, Board letter providing feedback on the Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Recommendation 2004- 1 IP and the recently issued Department of Energy (DOE) Manual 450.4- 1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual, contain the actions necessary to...

453

August 5, 2005, Board letter accepting the implementation plan...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

important safety positions. In its Implementation Plan, DOE commits to Integrated Safety Management (ISM) as the foundation of its safety management system and process....

454

August 5, 2005, Board letter accepting the implementation plan...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Samuel W. Bodman Page 2 In its Implementation Plan, DOE commits to Integrated Safety Management (ISM) "as the foundation of its safety management system and process." The...

455

November 21, 2001, DNFSB letter enclosing suggestions on the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the nuclear materials stabilization programs provided by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) and National Nuclear Security Administration...

456

Letter, June 14, 2007, Preliminary Notice of Violation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to the investigation of events at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex - Accelerated Retrieval Project (ARP) by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement. The...

457

October 12, 2006, Department letter forwarding the revised implementat...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

organizations and facilities: (1) concurs with the determination of the applicability of DOE Directives involving nuclear safety included in contracts pursuant to DEAR...

458

November 3, 2009, Department letter accepting Board Recommendation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

applications. 2. Consistent with this policy, establish requirements and guidance in a DOE directive or directives that prescribe controls over the quality, use, implementation,...

459

June 6, 2013, Department letter transmitting the Implementation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

trains. DOE is currently working towards installation of safety-significant (SS) instrumentation for real-time monitoring of the ventilation exhaust flow from each...

460

Deep convection triggering by boundary layer thermals. Part 2: Stochastic triggering parametrization for the LMDZ GCM  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper presents a stochastic triggering parameterization for deep convection and its implementation in the latest standard version of the LMDs GCM: LMDZ5B. The derivation of the formulation of this parameterization and the justification, ...

Nicolas Rochetin; Jean-Yves Grandpeix; Catherine Rio; Fleur Couvreux

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

High Level Trigger Configuration and Handling of Trigger Tables in the CMS Filter Farm  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CMS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider is currently being commissioned and is scheduled to collect the first pp collision data in 2008. CMS features a two-level trigger system. The Level-1 trigger, based on custom hardware, is designed to reduce the collision rate of 40 MHz to approximately 100 kHz. Data for events accepted by the Level-1 trigger are read out and assembled by an Event Builder. The High Level Trigger (HLT) employs a set of sophisticated software algorithms, to analyze the complete event information, and further reduce the accepted event rate for permanent storage and analysis. This paper describes the design and implementation of the HLT Configuration Management system. First experiences with commissioning of the HLT system are also reported.

Bauer, G; Behrens, U; Boyer, V; Branson, J; Brett, A; Cano, E; Carboni, A; Ciganek, M; Cittolin, S; O'dell, V; Erhan, S; Gigi, D; Glege, F; Gomez-Reino, R; Gulmini, M; Gutleber, J; Hollar, J; Lange, D; Kim, J C; Klute, M; Lipeles, E; Perez, J L; Maron, G; Meijers, F; Meschi, E; Moser, R; Mlot, E G; Murray, S; Oh, A; Orsini, L; Paus, C; Petrucci, A; Pieri, M; Pollet, L; Racz, A; Sakulin, H; Sani, M; Schieferdecker, P; Schwick, C; Sumorok, K; Suzuki, I; Tsirigkas, D; Varela, J

2009-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

462

302 IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, VOL. 15, NO. 3, MARCH 2011 Rethinking the Secrecy Outage Formulation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, IEEE, Behrouz Maham, Member, IEEE, and Are Hjørungnes, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract--This letter of this letter and approving it for publication was P. Cotae. X. Zhou, B. Maham, and A. Hjørungnes are with UNIK

Zhou, Xiangyun "Sean"

463

DOE Warns Manufacturers Who Submitted Incomplete Certification Reports |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Warns Manufacturers Who Submitted Incomplete Certification Warns Manufacturers Who Submitted Incomplete Certification Reports DOE Warns Manufacturers Who Submitted Incomplete Certification Reports February 2, 2010 - 1:53pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Department of Energy's Office of General Counsel has sent warning letters to 9 manufacturers or trade associations that submitted incomplete energy-efficiency test data to comply with DOE's energy-efficiency standards. This data was submitted during the 30-day grace period that ran from December 9, 2009, to January 8, 2010. Data for about 600,000 products was submitted. In this case, however, the data was incomplete. In light of the apparent attempt to comply with Department's regulations, the warning letters simply identify various substantive deficiencies in the data submitted, demand their expeditious

464

Enforcement Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC - July 10, 2009 Enforcement Letter , Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC - July 10, 2009 July 10, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Y-12 National Security Complex The purpose of this enforcement letter is to communicate the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement concerns with the protection of classified information at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12). A recent Office of Security Enforcement analysis of security incidents identified a number of concerns that warrant prompt attention by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC (B&W Y-12) management to

465

Response by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the Virginia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to Order No. 202-05-03 Response by PJM to letters from the City of Alexandria and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to Order No. 202-05-03 Docket No. EO-05-01: Following the release of the Department of Energy's Order No. 202-05-3 issued December 20, 2005 (the "Order"), both the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality ("DEQ") and the City of Alexandria (the "City") have filed letters asserting an imminent breach of the Order. PJM responds to those letters and takes issue both (i) with the assertion of an imminent breach of the Order, and (ii) the suggestion that maintenance of transmission facilities serving the District of Columbia be

466

Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - June 19, 2002 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2002 June 19, 2002 Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - June 19, 2002 June 19, 2002 Enforcement Letter issued to Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC related to Unplanned Radioactive Material Uptakes at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's evaluation of facts and circumstances concerning the October 2001 unplanned uptakes of radioactive material by two Radiological Control Technicians (RCT) in Building [ ]. These issues were reported into the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) by your staff (NTS-RFO--KHLL-[ ] 2002-0001) on February 11, 2002. Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - June 19, 2002 More Documents & Publications Consent Order, Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC - EA 98-03 Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C. - July 20, 1998

467

Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 June 30, 2009 Effectiveness in Implementing the Cooperative Audit Strategy The Cooperative Audit Strategy, was developed by the Office of Inspector General, in consultation with the Office of Chief FInancial Officer, the Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, and the Contractor Internal Audit Council. The Strategy was developed after a 1992 OIG report identified that the quality of the Management and Operating (M&O) contractor's internal audit functions work was inconsistent and unsatisfactory and could not be relied upon for internal control purposes. Topic: Management and Administration Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 More Documents & Publications Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-11

468

Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 June 30, 2009 Effectiveness in Implementing the Cooperative Audit Strategy The Cooperative Audit Strategy, was developed by the Office of Inspector General, in consultation with the Office of Chief FInancial Officer, the Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, and the Contractor Internal Audit Council. The Strategy was developed after a 1992 OIG report identified that the quality of the Management and Operating (M&O) contractor's internal audit functions work was inconsistent and unsatisfactory and could not be relied upon for internal control purposes. Topic: Management and Administration Auidit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-08 More Documents & Publications Audit Letter Report: OAS-L-09-11

469

Event density analysis for event triggered control systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In event triggered control systems, events occur aperiodically. For the real-time analysis of such systems, an appropriate approximation of the events' stimulation is necessary. Upper bounds have already been found for event triggered systems. For now, ...

Tobias Bund; Benjamin Menhorn; Frank Slomka

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

The Design and Performance of the ATLAS jet trigger  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS jet trigger, in combination with other triggers, provides an important ingredient to studies of Standard Model physics and searches for new physics at the LHC. The ATLAS jet trigger system has undergone substantial modifications over the past few years of LHC operations, as experience developed with triggering in a high luminosity and high event pileup environment. In particular, the region-of-interest (ROI) based strategy has been replaced by a full scan of the calorimeter data at the third trigger level, and by a full scan of the level-1 trigger input at level-2 for some specific trigger chains. Hadronic calibration and cleaning techniques are applied in order to provide improved performance and increased stability in high luminosity data taking conditions. In this presentation we describe the structure and performance of the jet trigger in recent data taking conditions.

Rubbo, F; The ATLAS collaboration

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Attached is Policy Flash 2013-34 Department of Energy Acquisition Letter 2013-04 on Executive Compensation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Attached is Policy Flash 2013-34 Department of Energy Acquisition Letter 2013-04 on Executive Compensation

472

Gamma Ray Array Detector Trigger Sub-System  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Gamma Ray Array Detector (GRAD) is one of External Target Facility (ETF) subsystems at the Heavy Ion Research Facility at Lanzhou. The trigger subsystem of the GRAD has been developed based on Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGAs) and PXI interface. The GRAD trigger subsystem makes prompt L1 trigger decisions to select valid events. These decisions are made by processing the hit signals from 1024 CsI scintillators of the GRAD. According to the physical requirements, the GRAD trigger subsystem generates 12-bit trigger signals that are passed to the ETF global trigger system. In addition, the GRAD trigger subsystem generates trigger data that are packed and transmitted to the host computer via PXI bus for off-line analysis. The trigger processing is implemented in the front-end electronics and one FPGA of the trigger module. The logic of PXI transmission and reconfiguration is implemented in the other FPGA of the trigger module. The reliable and efficient performance in the Gamma-ray experiments demonstrates that the GRAD trigger subsystem is capable to satisfy the physical requirements.

Du Zhong-Wei; Su Hong; Qian Yi; Kong Jie

2012-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

473

When do I need to submit a White Paper, Letter Of Intent or pre-Proposal through DSR?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

When do I need to submit a White Paper, Letter Of Intent or pre-Proposal through DSR? · Sponsor requires only a white paper/letter of intent. · No budget is being submitted. · No authorized signature. · Sponsor requires white paper/letter of intent be signed by an Authorized Official. · No budget is being

Jawitz, James W.

474

October 26, 2009, Board letter forwarding Recommendation 2009...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

information restricted by the Department of Energy (DOE) under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,42 U.S.C. 5 5 2161-2168, as amended, please arrange to have it placed promptly on file...

475

MULTIPLE LETTERS Mr. James Speir, Vice President Phosphate Operations  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

has determlned that it does not have authorlty under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, to conduct remedial action at this site If needed. As a result, the site...

476

August 5, 2005, Department letter reporting completion of Commitment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

revision to other ISM directives. Ultimately, it appears highly likely that the current ISM policy (DOE P 450.4) will need to be revised to be consistent with the Department's...

477

January 29, 2004, Board letter establishing a 30-day reporting...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

by law (42 U.S.C. 6 2286a(a)( 1)) to review and evaluate the content of all applicable DOE Orders, regulations, and requirements. The Board has conducted a detailed review of...

478

DOE-STD-3026-99 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-99 6-99 DOE-STD-3026-99 February 24, 2009 Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 This standard was developed primarily for application in U.S. Department of Energy programs. It contains specific direction for HEPA filter testing performed at a DOE-accepted HEPA Filter Test Facility (FTF). Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data that may improve this document should be sent to the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards (EH-31), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585, by letter or by using the self-addressed Document Improvement Proposal form (DOE F 1300.3) appearing at the end of this document. DOE-STD-3026-99: Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan More Documents & Publications

479

Response to Notice of Inquiry: Technology Transfer Practices at DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Response to Notice of Inquiry: Technology Transfer Practices at DOE Response to Notice of Inquiry: Technology Transfer Practices at DOE Laboratories (73 FR 2036) by Batelle Energy Alliance, LLC. Response to Notice of Inquiry: Technology Transfer Practices at DOE Laboratories (73 FR 2036) by Batelle Energy Alliance, LLC. Response to Notice of Inquiry: Technology Transfer Practices at DOE Laboratories (73 FR 2036) by Batelle Energy Alliance, LLC. This letter includes the BEA response (the contractor for Idaho National Laboratory) to the DOE's inquiry regarding suggestions for its Technology Transfer Practices. Recommended improvements include: more flexible transactional agreements to meet the diverse needs of interested parties, more support for commercial investors considering higher risk technologies, the removal of some of the U.S. manufacturing requirements, and more rights

480

DOE-STD-1167-2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-2003 7-2003 DOE-STD-1167-2003 February 4, 2004 Respiratory Acceptance Program for Supplied-Air Suits The supplied-air suits that protect DOE contractor and federal employees from exposure to harmful atmospheres and radioactive contaminants are not included in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certification process for respiratory protective devices. Therefore, with the awareness and acknowledgement of NIOSH and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Department established a system for acceptance testing of supplied-air suits. DOE-STD-1167-2003, Respiratory Acceptance Program for Supplied-Air Suits More Documents & Publications All Active DOE Technical Standards Document DOE-STD-3025-99 Enforcement Letter, WEL-2013-02

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "trigger letter doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

A simplified model of saltcake moisture distribution. Letter report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This letter report describes the formulation of a simplified model for finding the moisture distribution in a saltcake waste profile that has been stabilized by pumping out the drainable interstitial liquid. The model is based on assuming that capillarity mainly governs the distribution of moisture in the porous saltcake waste. A stead upward flow of moisture driven by evaporation from the waste surface is conceptualized to occur for isothermal conditions. To obtain hydraulic parameters for unsaturated conditions, the model is calibrated or matched to the relative saturation distribution as measured by neutron probe scans. The model is demonstrated on Tanks 104-BY and 105-TX as examples. A value of the model is that it identifies the key physical parameters that control the surface moisture content in a waste profile. Moreover, the model can be used to estimate the brine application rate at the waste surface that would raise the moisture content there to a safe level. Thus, the model can be applied to help design a strategy for correcting the moisture conditions in a saltcake waste tank.

Simmons, C.S.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

482

DOE Code:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

we1rbox installatiOn we1rbox installatiOn ____:....;...=.~;;....:..;=-+- DOE Code: - - !- Project Lead: Wes R1esland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J 3-24-10 1 Date: Project Information 1. Project Overview What are tne enwonmental mpacts? Contractor~~ _ _ _ _ ] 11 The purpose of this project is to prepare a pad for a 90 ton crane to get 1nto positiOn and ng up so we can 1 set our new weir box into position We will widen the existing road around 20 feet at the north end and taper our fill to about5 feet at the south end for a total of about 200 feeL and budd a near level pad for them tong up the crane on We will use the d1rt from the hill irnrnedJateiy north of the work to oe done 2. 3 4 What*s the legal location? What IS the durabon of the prOJed?

483

DOE F  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

420.2 420.2 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Records Management Division, IM-11 GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20585; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), Washington, DC 20503. U.S. Department of Energy Personal Property Loan Agreement DOE-PMR 109-1.5103 1. CONTROL

484

DOE Onboarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One-Year Passport to Success One-Year Passport to Success What is On-boarding? Orientation On-boarding  Transactional focus and goals  Less than one week  Executed by HR Office  Address new employee needs  Completed paperwork  Strategic focus and goals  Starts before first day through first year  Supervisor & Senior Leadership involvement  Integrate multiple offices, functions and individuals  Address employee needs  Maximizes employee engagement and retention 2 On-boarding Program Goals 3  Build and sustain high-performance culture by accelerating time for new employee to become productive  Create learning opportunities that allow new employees to successfully integrate into their new DOE organization  Provide employees with the tools and resources to

485

DOE 11  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE A ward N o.: D E--NT0005665 Final T echnical R eport (October 2 008 - S eptember 2 012) Source c haracterization a nd t emporal variation o f m ethane s eepage f rom thermokarst l akes o n t he A laska N orth S lope in r esponse t o A rctic c limate c hange Submitted b y: University o f A laska Fairbanks, A K 9 9775 Prepared for: United S tates D epartment o f E nergy National E nergy T echnology L aboratory May 29 th 2013 Office of Fossil Energy 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any

486

DOE Pulse  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

go! go! home about archives subscribe Profile Dr. Isaac Gamwo (left) works with Dr. Ward Burgess (right) at the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo Credit: NETL. The practical application of an elite researcher's life: Isaac K. Gamwo For a man whose expertise includes reactive multiphase fluid dynamics, complex fluid properties, and chemical looping combustion processes, Dr. Isaac Gamwo is surprisingly easy to comprehend. "The research we do in this lab is not confined to the world of academia," he notes, "it has tangible impacts on the way we produce energy." As senior research chemical engineer at DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Dr. Gamwo is currently focused on complex fluid properties at high temperatures and pressures. His recent work includes

487

Trigger Algorithm Design for a SUSY Lepton Trigger based on Forward Proton Tagging  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) pair production of SUSY leptons in gamma-gamma interactions will often include intact off-energy protons. Including detectors in the beampipe to measure these protons can give additional information to separate these events from background. We report on expected event rates and background rejection for a slepton trigger design in the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment incorporating forward proton information. We conclude that a trigger that can observe an interesting number of events is feasible with the appropriate detector hardware.

Gronberg, J; Hollar, J

2010-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

488

DOE-1 BDL SUMMARY. DOE-1 GROUP.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

may be this command. DOE~! Reference Manual. placed in BDL-3W-7405-EN ons c BDl, SUMMARY DOE~ I l.awrence , Californiaused in conjunction with other DOE~l documentation. Table of

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

An Analog Trigger System for Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Arrays of Cherenkov telescopes typically use multi-level trigger schemes to keep the rate of random triggers from the night sky background low. At a first stage, individual telescopes produce a trigger signal from the pixel information in the telescope camera. The final event trigger is then formed by combining trigger signals from several telescopes. In this poster, we present a possible scheme for the Cherenkov Telescope Array telescope trigger, which is based on the analog pulse information of the pixels in a telescope camera. Advanced versions of all components of the system have been produced and working prototypes have been tested, showing a performance that meets the original specifications. Finally, issues related to integrating the trigger system in a telescope camera and in the whole array will be dealt with.

Barcelo, M; Bigas, O Blanch; Boix, J; Delgado, C; Herranz, D; Lopez-Coto, R; Martinez, G

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

490

The ATLAS Muon Trigger vertical slice at LHC startup  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The ATLAS trigger system has a three-levels structure, implemented to retain interesting physics events, here described for the muon case ("Muon Vertical Slice"). The first level, implemented in a custom hardware, uses measurements from the trigger chambers of the Muon Spectrometer to select muons with high transverse momentum and defines a Region of Interest (RoI) in the detector. RoIs are then processed by a second trigger level, in which fast algorithms run on an online software architecture. Full granularity information from precision chambers is accessed inside RoIs. A third trigger level (Event Filter), using offline-like algorithms and accessing the full event, provide the best possible muon reconstruction/identification and finally confirm or discard the trigger hypothesis formed at earlier levels. Implementation and performance of the full muon trigger slice, together with first events triggered with LHC beams on, are presented.

Grancagnolo, Sergio

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

492

The Triggering and Bias of Radio Galaxies  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present new results on the clustering and three-dimensional distribution of radio galaxies from the Texas-Oxford NVSS Structure (TONS) survey. The TONS survey was constructed to look at the distribution of radio galaxies in a region of moderate (0 3 mJy) radio galaxies over large areas on the sky. We find that redshift spikes, which represent large concentrations of radio galaxies which trace (~ 100 Mpc^3) super-structures are a common phenomena in these surveys. Under the assumption of quasi-linear structure formation theory and a canonical radio galaxy bias,