Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

OA-50 Technical Qualification Program Standard Procedure, October 2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SP-OA-50-TQP-1 SP-OA-50-TQP-1 Office of Oversight Revision 0 Standard Procedure Page 2 of 19 Office/Facility Specific Qualification Standards build upon the Functional Area Qualification Standards and a functional analysis of the participant's specific office mission requirements and activities. Successful completion of the TQP entails satisfying all competencies contained in the General Technical Base, assigned primary Functional Area and Office/Facility Specific Qualification Standards applicable to the participant's position. Participants should normally successfully complete all TQP requirements within 18 months from the date they entered the program. Upon successful completion of the TQP, Oversight members will start the requalification

2

Lightning arrestor connector lead magnesium niobate qualification pellet test procedures.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Enhanced knowledge preservation for DOE DP technical component activities has recently received much attention. As part of this recent knowledge preservation effort, improved documentation of the sample preparation and electrical testing procedures for lead magnesium niobate--lead titanate (PMN/PT) qualification pellets was completed. The qualification pellets are fabricated from the same parent powders used to produce PMN/PT lightning arrestor connector (LAC) granules at HWF&T. In our report, the procedures for fired pellet surface preparation, electrode deposition, electrical testing and data recording are described. The dielectric measurements described in our report are an information only test. Technical reasons for selecting the electrode material, electrode size and geometry are presented. The electrical testing is based on measuring the dielectric constant and dissipation factor of the pellet during cooling from 280 C to 220 C. The most important data are the temperature for which the peak dielectric constant occurs (Curie Point temperature) and the peak dielectric constant magnitude. We determined that the peak dielectric constant for our procedure would be that measured at 1 kHz at the Curie Point. Both the peak dielectric constant and the Curie point parameters provide semi-quantitative information concerning the chemical and microstructural homogeneity of the parent material used for the production of PMN/PT granules for LACs. Finally, we have proposed flag limits for the dielectric data for the pellets. Specifically, if the temperature of the peak dielectric constant falls outside the range of 250 C {+-} 30 C we propose that a flag limit be imposed that will initiate communication between production agency and design agency personnel. If the peak dielectric constant measured falls outside the range 25,000 {+-} 10,000 we also propose that a flag limit be imposed.

Tuohig, W. (Honeywell FM& T, Kansas City, MO); Mahoney, Patrick A.; Tuttle, Bruce Andrew; Wheeler, Jill Susanne

2009-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

. . NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1168-2013 October 2013 DOE STANDARD CONFINEMENT VENTILATION AND PROCESS GAS TREATMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1168-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://energy.gov/hss/information-center/department-energy-technical-standards-program ii DOE-STD-1168-2013 INTENTIONALLY BLANK iv DOE-STD-1168-2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT...................................................................................................................vii

4

Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Waste Feed Qualification Program Development Approach - 13114  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is a nuclear waste treatment facility being designed and constructed for the U.S. Department of Energy by Bechtel National, Inc. and subcontractor URS Corporation (under contract DE-AC27-01RV14136 [1]) to process and vitrify radioactive waste that is currently stored in underground tanks at the Hanford Site. A wide range of planning is in progress to prepare for safe start-up, commissioning, and operation. The waste feed qualification program is being developed to protect the WTP design, safety basis, and technical basis by assuring acceptance requirements can be met before the transfer of waste. The WTP Project has partnered with Savannah River National Laboratory to develop the waste feed qualification program. The results of waste feed qualification activities will be implemented using a batch processing methodology, and will establish an acceptable range of operator controllable parameters needed to treat the staged waste. Waste feed qualification program development is being implemented in three separate phases. Phase 1 required identification of analytical methods and gaps. This activity has been completed, and provides the foundation for a technically defensible approach for waste feed qualification. Phase 2 of the program development is in progress. The activities in this phase include the closure of analytical methodology gaps identified during Phase 1, design and fabrication of laboratory-scale test apparatus, and determination of the waste feed qualification sample volume. Phase 3 will demonstrate waste feed qualification testing in support of Cold Commissioning. (authors)

Markillie, Jeffrey R.; Arakali, Aruna V.; Benson, Peter A.; Halverson, Thomas G. [Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project, Richland, WA 99354 (United States)] [Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project, Richland, WA 99354 (United States); Adamson, Duane J.; Herman, Connie C.; Peeler, David K. [Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC 29808 (United States)] [Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC 29808 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

Development Of A Macro-Batch Qualification Strategy For The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment And Immobilization Plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has evaluated the existing waste feed qualification strategy for the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) based on experience from the Savannah River Site (SRS) Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) waste qualification program. The current waste qualification programs for each of the sites are discussed in the report to provide a baseline for comparison. Recommendations on strategies are then provided that could be implemented at Hanford based on the successful Macrobatch qualification strategy utilized at SRS to reduce the risk of processing upsets or the production of a staged waste campaign that does not meet the processing requirements of the WTP. Considerations included the baseline WTP process, as well as options involving Direct High Level Waste (HLW) and Low Activity Waste (LAW) processing, and the potential use of a Tank Waste Characterization and Staging Facility (TWCSF). The main objectives of the Hanford waste feed qualification program are to demonstrate compliance with the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC), determine waste processability, and demonstrate unit operations at a laboratory scale. Risks to acceptability and successful implementation of this program, as compared to the DWPF Macro-Batch qualification strategy, include: Limitations of mixing/blending capability of the Hanford Tank Farm; The complexity of unit operations (i.e., multiple chemical and mechanical separations processes) involved in the WTP pretreatment qualification process; The need to account for effects of blending of LAW and HLW streams, as well as a recycle stream, within the PT unit operations; and The reliance on only a single set of unit operations demonstrations with the radioactive qualification sample. This later limitation is further complicated because of the 180-day completion requirement for all of the necessary waste feed qualification steps. The primary recommendations/changes include the following: Collection and characterization of samples for relevant process analytes from the tanks to be blended during the staging process; Initiation of qualification activities earlier in the staging process to optimize the campaign composition through evaluation from both a processing and glass composition perspective; Definition of the parameters that are important for processing in the WTP facilities (unit operations) across the anticipated range of wastes and as they relate to qualification-scale equipment; Performance of limited testing with simulants ahead of the waste feed qualification sample demonstration as needed to determine the available processing window for that campaign; and Demonstration of sufficient mixing in the staging tank to show that the waste qualification sample chemical and physical properties are representative of the transfers to be made to WTP. Potential flowcharts for derivatives of the Hanford waste feed qualification process are also provided in this report. While these recommendations are an extension of the existing WTP waste qualification program, they are more in line with the processes currently performed for SRS. The implementation of these processes at SRS has been shown to offer flexibility for processing, having identified potential processing issues ahead of the qualification or facility processing, and having provided opportunity to optimize waste loading and throughput in the DWPF.

Herman, Connie C.

2013-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

6

Protocol, Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 Protocol, Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 October 22, 2003 Technical Qualification Program Procedure (OA-50-TQP-1) This procedure implements the Office of ES&H Evaluations Technical Qualification Program (TQP) per the criteria contained in DOE Manual 426.1-1 "Federal Technical Capability Manual". Key elements of the program include: identifying personnel required to participate in the TQP, identifying, developing, approving, revising and updating individual qualification requirements, evaluating staff members against the assigned Technical Qualification Standards and documenting the approval of equivalencies, establishing and updating individual development plans, training

7

Functional Area Qualification Standard Qualification Cards | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Qualification Cards Functional Area Qualification Standard Qualification Cards Note: 1. Save the document from the website onto your PC and close it. 2. Open the document on your PC. Answer "No" to the question regarding whether to open the documents as read only. Aviation Manager Aviation Safety Officer Chemical Processing Civil Structural Engineering Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Construction Management Criticality Safety Deactivation and Decommissioning Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Restoration Facility Maintenance Management Facility Representative Fire Protection

8

Assessor Training Assessor Qualification &  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NVLAP Assessor Training Assessor Qualification & Training Requirements #12;Assessor Training 2009: Qualification & Training Requirements 2 References ·ISO/IEC 17011: Conformity assessment General requirements 2 #12;Assessor Training 2009: Qualification & Training Requirements 3 Assessor Defined ·Lead

9

Facility Representative Program: Qualification Standards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Training & Qualification Information Training & Qualification Information Qualification Standards DOE Order Self-Study Modules DOE Fundamentals Handbooks Nuclear Safety Basis Self-Study Guide Energy Online Courses Available Link to National Training Center Basic Courses for Facility Representative Qualification Recommended Courses to Expand Facility Representative's Knowledge Base Qualification Standards General Technical Base Qualification Standard, Qualification Card & Reference Guide -- GTB Qualification Standard (DOE-STD-1146-2007), December 2007 [PDF] -- GTB Qualification Card, December 2007 [DOC] -- GTB "Gap" Qualification Card, December 2007 [DOC] -- GTB Qualification Standard Reference Guide, May 2008 [PDF] Facility Representative Qualification Standard, Qualification Card & Reference Guide

10

Procedures  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Procedures A NSSAB outreach display is available for community events The Nevada Site Specific Advisory Board (NSSAB) abides by a variety of federal and self-imposed procedures....

11

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Northwest  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Northwest Site Office This self-assessment evaluated how well the Technical Qualification and Federal Capability Programs were implemented at the Pacific Northwest Site Office. The assessment was conducted in accordance with the SCMS: Quality Assurance and Oversight: Subject Area: Assessments, Procedure 2, Performing Assessments and SCMS: Quality Assurance and Oversight: Subject Area: Issues Management, Procedure 1, Managing Issues Identified in Oversight Activities. PNSO TQP Self-Assessment More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program and FTCP Assessment CRADs

12

On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems: Soil Particle Analysis Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Soil is an important component of an on-site wastewater treatment system. This publication explains the composition of soils, the sizing of soil particles, and the ways soil particles are analyzed to determine whether a site is suitable for a...

Lesikar, Bruce J.

2005-08-18T23:59:59.000Z

13

Functional Area Qualification Standards | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standards Functional Area Qualification Standards Qualification Standard Qualification Standard Number Approved Aviation Manager DOE-STD-1165-2003 (CN-1) 2009-12 Aviation Safety Officer DOE-STD-1164-2003 (CN-1) 2010-01 Chemical Processing DOE-STD-1176-2010 2010-02 Civil/Structural Engineering DOE-STD-1182-2004 2004-03 Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment DOE-STD-1168-2013 2013-10 Construction Management DOE-STD-1180-2004 2004-03 Criticality Safety DOE-STD-1173-2009 2009-04 Deactivation and Decommissioning DOE-STD-1166-2003 2003-09 Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight DOE-STD-1170-2007 2007-08 Emergency Management DOE-STD-1177-2004 2004-01

14

Constellation ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualifications for Constellation Energy Services in relation to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contract (ESPC).

15

NORESCO ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualifications for NORESCO in relation to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contracts (ESPC).

16

Specialist Qualification Training (Revised)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This DOE Industrial Technologies Program fact sheet describes DOE's Specialist Qualification Training for experts in industrial compressed air, fan, pump, steam, and process heating systems.

Not Available

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

Firearms Qualification Courses Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Provides detailed requirements for qualification with various firearms. Errata Sheet 5-29-02. Cancels DOE M 473.2-1.

2002-01-17T23:59:59.000Z

18

Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Self-Assessment -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Self-Assessment - Chief of Nuclear Safety Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Self-Assessment - Chief of Nuclear Safety A self-assessment of the CNS Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Qualification Program was conducted during the week of July 8, 2013, when all STSM-qualified staff members were present in Germantown, Maryland. This was the first self-assessment that CNS has conducted. In accordance CNS Standard Operating Procedure SOP-016, Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program, a self-assessment is required once every four years. Chief of Nuclear Safety STSM Self-Assessment, August 2013 More Documents & Publications 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Chief of Nuclear

19

AGR-1 Data Qualification Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

ABSTRACT Projects for the very high temperature reactor (VHTR) Technology Development Office (TDO) program provide data in support of Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing of the VHTR. Fuel and materials to be used in the reactor are tested and characterized to quantify performance in high temperature and high fluence environments. The VHTR program has established the NGNP Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS) to ensure that VHTR data are (1) qualified for use, (2) stored in a readily accessible electronic form, and (3) analyzed to extract useful results. This document focuses on the first NDMAS objective. It describes the data streams associated with the first Advanced Gas Reactor experiment (AGR-1), the processing of these data within NDMAS, and reports the qualification status of the data. Data qualification activities within NDMAS for specific types of data are determined by the data qualification category assigned by the data generator. They include: (1) capture testing, to confirm that the data stored within NDMAS are identical to the raw data supplied, (2) accuracy testing, to confirm that the data are an accurate representation of the system or object being measured, and (3) documentation that the data were collected under an NQA-1 or equivalent quality assurance program. The NDMAS database processing and qualification status of the following five data streams is reported in this document: 1. Fuel fabrication data. All data have been processed into the NDMAS database and qualified (1,819 records). 2. Fuel irradiation data. Data from all 13 AGR-1 reactor cycles have been processed into the NDMAS database and tested. Of these, 85% have been qualified and 15% have failed NDMAS accuracy testing. 3. FPMS data. Reprocessed (January 2010) data from all 13 AGR-1 reactor cycles have been processed into the database and capture tested. Final qualification of these data will be recorded after QA approval of an Engineering Calculations and Analysis Report currently in review. 4. ATR Operating Conditions Data. Data for all AGR-1 cycles have been stored and capture tested. These data, which come from outside the VHTR program, are assumed to be qualified by ATR quality control procedures. 5. Neutronics and Thermal Modeling Data. NDMAS processing is in progress. These data will not be qualified by NDMAS.

Michael Abbott

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

FAQS Qualification Card - NNSA Package Certification Engineer...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Qualification Card - NNSA Package Certification Engineer FAQS Qualification Card - NNSA Package Certification Engineer A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Firearms Qualification Courses Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Defines the required courses of fire for authorized firearms in order to ensure the uniform qualification and requalification of DOE Federal Officers and Security Police Officers by certified Federal and contractor firearms instructors.

1997-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

22

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Cards outline the differences between the last and latest version of the FAQ Standard.

23

Firearms Qualification Courses Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Defines the required courses of fire for authorized firearms in order to ensure the uniform qualification and requalification of DOE Federal Officers and Security Police Officers by certified Federal and contractor firearms instructors. DOE N 251.40, dated 5-3-01, extends this directive until 12-31-01. Cancels DOE M 5632.7-1.

1997-07-08T23:59:59.000Z

24

Ameresco ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ameresco, Inc. Ameresco, Inc. ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Ameresco Qualifications Sheet - DOE ESPC CB-5879-00-0/13-12-00.1 Introduction to Ameresco Ameresco, Inc. (NYSE:AMRC) is one of the largest independent energy services providers in North America, delivering long-term customer value and environmental sustainability through energy efficiency measures, alternative energy infrastructure solutions, and innovative facility renewal strategies. Unaffiliated with a utility or manufacturer, Ameresco is widely recognized for its world-class energy engineering expertise and for establishing industry best-practices. With a corporate philosophy of promoting sustainability, Ameresco has one core mission centered on energy. Ameresco's team of energy professionals, including registered professional engineers and

25

Firearms Qualification Courses Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) requires all protective force personnel authorized to carry firearms to receive proper firearms training and qualification. The most important part of such training is the proper use of deadly force, which is included in the DOE Basic Security policy officer Program and is available as a separate program through the Safeguards and Security Central Training Academy. Canceled by DOE M 473.2-1 dated 07/08/1997.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PROTECTIVE FORCE PROTECTIVE FORCE FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Health, Safety and Security AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.hss.energy.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses July 2011 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A - APPROVED FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES .......................... I-1 CHAPTER I . INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... I-1 1. Scope .................................................................................................................. I-1 2. Content ............................................................................................................... I-1

27

Honeywell International ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualifications for Honeywell International in relation to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contracts (ESPC).

28

Schneider Electric ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fact sheet outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualifications for Schneider Electric in relation to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contracts (ESPC).

29

Lockheed Martin ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualifications sheet for Lockheed Martin under the Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contract (ESPC).

30

Johnson Controls ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualifications for Johnson Controls in relation to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contracts (ESPC).

31

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card Occupational Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards outline the differences between the last and latest version of the FAQ Standard.

32

Chapter 9 - Contracting Qualifications | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Chapter 9 - Contracting Qualifications Chapter 9 - Contracting Qualifications 9.4 - Contractor Responsibility Determinations 9.1ConflictofInterest0.pdf 9.2PerformanceGuarante...

33

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card Radiation Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards outline the differences between the last and latest version of the FAQ Standard.

34

FAQS Qualification Card Occupational Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A key element for the Departments Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

35

FAQS Qualification Card Radiation Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A key element for the Departments Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

36

FAQS Qualification Card Environment Compliance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A key element for the Departments Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

37

FAQS Qualification Card Mechanical Systems  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A key element for the Departments Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

38

NORESCO ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NORESCO NORESCO ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to NORESCO NORESCO specializes in the turnkey development and implementation of Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) projects for federal and state government clients. ESPC is a contracting vehicle that leverages contractor investment and, therefore, requires no capital investment on the part of the government. Instead, the contractor incurs all costs and risks of development and implementation of energy efficiency and facility infrastructure upgrade projects in exchange for a share of the verified energy, resource, and operational savings produced. NORESCO's approach to ESPC projects is to provide comprehensive, customized solutions to

39

Mechanical Systems Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61-2008 61-2008 June 2008 DOE STANDARD MECHANICAL SYSTEMS QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1161-2008 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1161-2008 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1161-2008 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................1

40

SRNL PHASE 1 ASSESSMENT OF THE WTP WASTE QUALIFICATION PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Project is currently transitioning its emphasis from an engineering design and construction phase toward facility completion, start-up and commissioning. With this transition, the WTP Project has initiated more detailed assessments of the requirements that must be met during the actual processing of the Hanford Site tank waste. One particular area of interest is the waste qualification program. In general, the waste qualification program involves testing and analysis to demonstrate compliance with waste acceptance criteria, determine waste processability, and demonstrate laboratory-scale unit operations to support WTP operations. The testing and analysis are driven by data quality objectives (DQO) requirements necessary for meeting waste acceptance criteria for transfer of high-level wastes from the tank farms to the WTP, and for ensuring waste processability including proper glass formulations during processing within the WTP complex. Given the successful implementation of similar waste qualification efforts at the Savannah River Site (SRS) which were based on critical technical support and guidance from the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), WTP requested subject matter experts (SMEs) from SRNL to support a technology exchange with respect to waste qualification programs in which a critical review of the WTP program could be initiated and lessons learned could be shared. The technology exchange was held on July 18-20, 2011 in Richland, Washington, and was the initial step in a multi-phased approach to support development and implementation of a successful waste qualification program at the WTP. The 3-day workshop was hosted by WTP with representatives from the Tank Operations Contractor (TOC) and SRNL in attendance as well as representatives from the US DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) and the Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB) Site Representative office. The purpose of the workshop was to share lessons learned and provide a technology exchange to support development of a technically defensible waste qualification program. The objective of this report is to provide a review, from SRNL's perspective, of the WTP waste qualification program as presented during the workshop. In addition to SRNL's perspective on the general approach to the waste qualification program, more detailed insight into the specific unit operations presented by WTP during the workshop is provided. This report also provides a general overview of the SRS qualification program which serves as a basis for a comparison between the two programs. Recommendations regarding specific steps are made based on the review and SRNL's lessons learned from qualification of SRS low-activity waste (LAW) and high-level waste (HLW) to support maturation of the waste qualification program leading to WTP implementation.

Peeler, D.; Hansen, E.; Herman, C.; Marra, S.; Wilmarth, B.

2012-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards Note: 1. Save the document from the website onto your PC and close it. 2. Open the document on your PC. Answer "No" to the question regarding whether to open the documents as read only. Chemical Processing Gap Construction Management Gap Criticality Safety Gap Emergency Management Gap Environmental Restoration Gap Facility Representative Gap Fire Protection Engineering Gap General Technical Base Gap Industrial Hygiene Gap Mechanical Systems Gap Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Gap Nuclear Safety Specialist Gap Occupational Safety Gap Quality Assurance Gap

42

Constellation ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. is a full-service energy company that provides comprehensive and innovative solutions to meet the energy needs of governmental, large commercial, institutional, and industrial customers. We have implemented over 4,000 energy conservation projects in the past 25 years, and financed over $1 billion in projects. Constellation has a long history of working with federal agencies to complete many successful major projects using multiple technologies and proven project development and management processes. * Energy Conservation Projects - Constellation is a pioneer in the ESCO industry having implemented thousands

43

ITER Central Solenoid Coil Insulation Qualification  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An insulation system for ITER Central Solenoid must have sufficiently high electrical and structural strength. Design efforts to bring stresses in the turn and layer insulation within allowables failed. It turned out to be impossible to eliminate high local tensile stresses in the winding pack. When high local stresses can not be designed out, the qualification procedure requires verification of the acceptable structural and electrical strength by testing. We built two 4x4 arrays of the conductor jacket with two options of the CS insulation and subjected the arrays to 1.2 million compressive cycles at 60 MPa and at 76 K. Such conditions simulated stresses in the CS insulation. We performed voltage withstand tests and after end of cycling we measured the breakdown voltages between in the arrays. After that we dissectioned the arrays and studied micro cracks in the insulation. We report details of the specimens preparation, test procedures and test results.

Martovetsky, Nicolai N [ORNL] [ORNL; Mann Jr, Thomas Latta [ORNL] [ORNL; Miller, John L [ORNL] [ORNL; Freudenberg, Kevin D [ORNL] [ORNL; Reed, Richard P [Cryogenic Materials, Inc.] [Cryogenic Materials, Inc.; Walsh, Robert P [Florida State University] [Florida State University; McColskey, J D [National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Boulder] [National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Boulder; Evans, D [Advanced Cryogenic Materials] [Advanced Cryogenic Materials

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Wet welding qualification trials at 35 MSW  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Wet welding is gaining increased attention and attraction for application on marine buildings and offshore structures all over the world because of its versatility, flexibility and mobility in combination with low investment costs. In a common research and development project between PETROBRAS/CENPES, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and GKSS Research Centre, Geesthacht, Germany wet welding qualification trials have been performed in different water depths up to 35 msw. The tests have been performed with newly developed electrodes in two different wet welding procedures. The experiments have been carried out on SS- as well as on 5F-specimens acc. ANSI/AWS D 3.6-89. Results will be presented in respect to the performance of the two welding procedures especially with regard to the avoidance of hydrogen induced cold cracking and high hardness values.

Dos Santos, V.R.; Teixeira, C.J. [Petrobras/CENPES, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil); Szelagowski, P.J.F. [GKSS Research Center, Geesthacht (Germany)

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

45

ITER CENTRAL SOLENOID COIL INSULATION QUALIFICATION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An insulation system for ITER Central Solenoid must have sufficiently high electrical and structural strength. Design efforts to bring stresses in the turn and layer insulation within allowables failed. It turned out to be impossible to eliminate high local tensile stresses in the winding pack. When high local stresses can not be designed out, the qualification procedure requires verification of the acceptable structural and electrical strength by testing. We built two 4 x 4 arrays of the conductor jacket with two options of the CS insulation and subjected the arrays to 1.2 million compressive cycles at 60 MPa and at 76 K. Such conditions simulated stresses in the CS insulation. We performed voltage withstand tests and after end of cycling we measured the breakdown voltages between in the arrays. After that we dissectioned the arrays and studied micro cracks in the insulation. We report details of the specimens preparation, test procedures and test results.

Martovetsky, N N; Mann, T L; Miller, J R; Freudenberg, K D; Reed, R P; Walsh, R P; McColskey, J D; Evans, D

2009-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

46

BNL | CFN Laser System Qualifications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Laser System Qualification There are multiple laser systems at the CFN. Users who will be working with the following class 3B or 4 laser systems are required to complete the Laser...

47

CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURES IN HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Computerized procedures (CPs) are an emerging technology within nuclear power plant control rooms. While CPs have been implemented internationally in advanced control rooms, to date no US nuclear power plant has implemented CPs in its main control room. Yet, CPs are a reality of new plant builds and are an area of considerable interest to existing plants, which see advantages in terms of easier records management by omitting the need for updating hardcopy procedures. The overall intent of this paper is to provide a characterization of human reliability analysis (HRA) issues for computerized procedures. It is beyond the scope of this document to propose a new HRA approach or to recommend specific methods or refinements to those methods. Rather, this paper serves as a review of current HRA as it may be used for the analysis and review of computerized procedures.

Ronald L. Boring; David I. Gertman

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

48

Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses DOE Aviation Manager DOE Aviation Safety Officer Chemical Processing Civil/Structural Engineering Confinement Ventilation and Process Gas Treatment Construction Management Deactivation and Decommissioning Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Restoration Facility Representative Fire Protection Engineering General Technical Base Industrial Hygiene Instrument and Controls NNSA Package Certification Engineer Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Nuclear Safety Specialist Quality Assurance Radiation Protection Safeguards and Security Safeguards and Security General Technical Base

49

WASTE MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Standard Qualification Standard Reference Guide August 2010 Waste Management This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents iii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ vi PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

50

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Standard Qualification Standard Reference Guide JULY 2011 Occupational Safety This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ iv ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. v PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

51

Chapter 9 - Contracting Qualifications | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 - Contracting Qualifications Chapter 9 - Contracting Qualifications 9.4 - Contractor Responsibility Determinations 9.1ConflictofInterest0.pdf 9.2PerformanceGuarantees0.pdf...

52

Functional Area Qualification Standard Reference Guides  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The reference guides have been developed to address the competency statements in DOE Functional Area Qualification Standard.

53

Committee on Educational Policy MAJOR QUALIFICATION POLICY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Committee on Educational Policy MAJOR QUALIFICATION POLICY CEP encourages all undergraduate to formalize these guidelines by implementing a policy that restricts qualification to one or more majors. CEP of the major qualifications policy on other undergraduate programs; · discuss the potential effects

California at Santa Cruz, University of

54

Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Schedule  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation Schedule Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation Schedule (Note 1) Year 2013 2014 Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec P Site/Office EM Sites/Offices Y Carlsbad Field Office ? Consolidated Business Center Y Office of River Protection (Note 3) ? Office of Site Support and Small Projects N Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Y Richland Operations Office (Note 3) Y Savannah River Operations Office N Office of Environmental Management SC Sites/Offices

55

FAQS Qualification Card - Environmental Restoration | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration FAQS Qualification Card - Environmental Restoration A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-EnvironmentalRestoration.docx Description Environmental Restoration Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - General Technical Base

56

Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures R.P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose1,2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

a Dutch Academic Hos- pital, provided for the BPI challenge is analyzed using process mining techniques. The log contains events related to treatment and diagnosis steps for patients diagnosed with cancer. Given subsets of cases (e.g., patients having a particular type of cancer that need to be treated urgently

van der Aalst, Wil

57

Contract PQQ Pre-Qualification  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Contract PQQ Pre-Qualification Questionnaire Design, Build and Installation of Interpretation within the new Welcome Building at Westonbirt, the National Arboretum Contract No: W156/F15.90 OJEU Ref: 2012-164242 #12;Contract PQQ 5a. Contract PQQ | 2 | Version 2 04/12 Introduction The Forestry

58

FAQS Qualification Card - Transportation and Traffic Management |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation and Traffic Management Transportation and Traffic Management FAQS Qualification Card - Transportation and Traffic Management A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-TransportationAndTrafficManagement.docx Description Transportation and Traffic Management Qualification Card

59

Firearms Qualifications Courses | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Firearms Qualifications Courses Firearms Qualifications Courses Firearms Qualifications Courses PURPOSE. To describe the process by which U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) protective force (PF) firearms qualification courses are developed, reviewed, revised, validated, and approved. SCOPE. The process described herein applies to all PF firearms policy development participants; notably, the staff of the DOE Office of Security (HS-50), the DOE National Training Center (NTC) (HS-70), the DOE Firearms Policy Panel (FPP), the DOE Protective Forces Safety Committee (PFSC), the DOE Training Managers' Working Group (TMWG), the DOE Training Advisory Committee (TAC), and any program office or site firearms subject matter experts that desire to contribute to any

60

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Emergency Management Qualification Standard Reference Guide JUNE 2009 Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. i PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

FAQS Qualification Card - NNSA Package Certification Engineer |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NNSA Package Certification Engineer NNSA Package Certification Engineer FAQS Qualification Card - NNSA Package Certification Engineer A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-NNSAPackageCertificationEngineer.docx Description NNSA Package Certification Engineer Qualification Card

62

FACILITY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Facility Maintenance Management Qualification Standard Reference Guide NOVEMBER 2009 Table of Contents i FIGURES...................................................................................................................................... iv TABLES........................................................................................................................................ iv ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. v PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

63

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Environmental Compliance Qualification Standard Reference Guide DECEMBER 2011 Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

64

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Restoration Qualification Standard Reference Guide NOVEMBER 2009 i Table of Contents i FIGURES...................................................................................................................................... iv TABLES........................................................................................................................................ iv ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. v PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

65

FTCP Issues Paper - Technical Qualification Program Requalification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Requalification Technical Qualification Program Requalification DOCUMENT NUMBER: FTCP-08-002 PROBLEM (Issue or Position): At the request of the Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) Chairperson, a team was assembled to develop a set of objective criteria to be used to assess whether positions assigned a Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) should be required to periodically requalify. This paper examines two objectives regarding requalification for Federal employees under the FTCP as follows: (1) Defining what criteria can be used to assess whether positions assigned a TQP FAQS should be required to periodically requalify; and (2) Recommended implementation mechanisms for the frequency/periodicity for

66

CRITICALITY SAFETY QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Criticality Criticality Safety Qualification Standard Reference Guide APRIL 2011 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... 2

67

Pepco Energy Services ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualifications for Pepco Energy Services in relation to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOEs) energy savings performance contracts (ESPC).

68

Component and System Qualification Workshop Proceedings  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Proceedings from the U.S. DOE Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop, held at Sandia National Laboratory in Livermore, CA, on November 4, 2010.

69

Memorandum, Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Incentives |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Memorandum, Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Memorandum, Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Incentives Memorandum, Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Incentives The National Nuclear Security Admin istration (NNSA) Technica l Qualification Program (TQP) was established as a process to ensure Federal technical employees possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform their assigned duties and responsibilities. The TQP enhances the ability of the NNSA and Department of Energy (DOE) to recruit, hire, and maintain highly qualified individuals. In conjunction with other training initiatives, accreditation of a site's TQP program provides the site manager with additional assurance that the program is functioning as intended. Memorandum - TQP Accreditation Incentives

70

Qualification of Alternative Fuels | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

of Alternative Fuels Thomas Butcher presentation on May 8, 2012 at the Pyrolysis Oil Workshop on the qualification of alternative fuels. pyrolysisbutcher.pdf More...

71

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card Civil Structural Engineering  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards outline the differences between the last and latest version of the FAQ Standard.

72

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - NNSA...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - NNSA Production Office - 2014 Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - NNSA Production Office - 2014 In...

73

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card Nuclear Safety Specialist  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Functional Area Qualification Standard Gap Analysis Qualification Cards outline the differences between the last and latest version of the FAQ Standard.

74

Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Self-Assessment...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Self-Assessment - Chief of Nuclear Safety Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Self-Assessment - Chief of...

75

FAQS Qualification Card- Civil Structural Engineering  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A key element for the Departments Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

76

FAQS Qualification Card- Deactivation and Decommissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A key element for the Departments Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA).

77

Honeywell International ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Honeywell International ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to Honeywell Honeywell has a 110-year history delivering technologically advanced energy solutions to the Energy, Aerospace, Transportation, Chemical and Automation industries. Honeywell is shaping the entire energy spectrum, from cost-saving room thermostats to biofuels. Overall, nearly 50 percent of Honeywell's product portfolio is linked to energy efficiency. We estimate the global economy could operate on 10 to 25 percent less energy by using our existing technologies. Honeywell is a pioneer in performance contracting with more than 25 years of experience delivering performance-based energy solutions. At Honeywell we are building a world that's safer and more secure. More comfortable

78

Weapons Quality Assurance Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-2008 5-2008 September 2008 DOE STANDARD WEAPON QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD NNSA Weapon Quality Assurance Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1025-2008 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1025-2008 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1025-2008 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE....................................................................................................................................

79

Johnson Controls ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Johnson Controls ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to Johnson Controls Johnson Controls has been a worldwide leader in building controls and efficiency for over 120 years (since 1885). Johnson Controls has developed, designed, installed, financed, measured, verified, operated, maintained, and guaranteed the savings for more than 2,500 projects for our diverse customer base worldwide. Under current Federal ESPC contracts, we have Johnson Controls manages developed and implemented more than 75 projects for various a performance contracting agencies, including the Army, DOE, Air Force, Navy, General Services portfolio in the U.S. of over Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, Justice Department, $4.3 billion

80

Defense Program Equivalencies for Technical Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Defense Program Equivalencies for Technical Qualification Standard Defense Program Equivalencies for Technical Qualification Standard Competencies12/12/1995 Defense Program Equivalencies for Technical Qualification Standard Competencies12/12/1995 Defense Programs has undertaken an effort to compare the competencies in the General Technical Base Qualification Standard and the Functional Area Qualification Standards with various positions in the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program and the commercial nuclear industry. The purpose of this effort is to determine if equivalencies can be granted for competencies based on previous training and experience in these areas. The equivalency crosswalk was developed by subject matter experts who held positions in the Navy and/or the commercial nuclear power program. To date, equivalencies have been

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

FAQS Qualification Card - Quality Assurance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Card - Quality Assurance Qualification Card - Quality Assurance FAQS Qualification Card - Quality Assurance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-QualityAssurance.docx Description Quality Assurance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Quality Assurance

82

FAQS Qualification Card - Occupational Safety | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Card - Occupational Safety Qualification Card - Occupational Safety FAQS Qualification Card - Occupational Safety A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-OccupationalSafety.docx Description Occupational Safety Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Chemical Processing

83

FAQS Qualification Card - Industrial Hygiene | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FAQS Qualification Card - Industrial Hygiene FAQS Qualification Card - Industrial Hygiene FAQS Qualification Card - Industrial Hygiene A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-IndustrialHygiene.docx Description Industrial Hygiene Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Industrial Hygiene

84

Lockheed Martin ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lockheed Martin - Lockheed Martin - ESCO Qualification Sheet - DOE Super ESPC - Introduction to Lockheed Martin Global climate conditions, increased demands, and advances in technology are changing our energy environment. By tapping into the unparalleled engineering and project management expertise used to design some of the world's most advanced products and services, Lockheed Martin is helping our energy customers respond to dynamic business requirements. Lockheed Martin has been increasingly supporting energy and climate solutions over the last 50 years for government, commercial and industrial customers. We are proud to bring more than 140,000 innovative minds to help solve our nation's energy and climate challenges-from efficiency and management, to alternative energies and climate monitoring.

85

Geometric Qualification of Production Parts  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Computer Aided Design (CAD) is a commonly utilized software tool to conceptualize and create the part designs that are then used as input for product definition, or for the manufacture of production parts within commercial industry and, more specifically, at the Kansas City Plant (KCP). However, data created on CAD systems is, at times, unable to regenerate within the originating CAD system or be shared or translated for use by a dissimilar CAD system. Commercial software has been developed to help identify or qualify these difficulties that occur in the usage of this data. This project reviewed the different commercial software packages available for the activity of qualification and made recommendations for availability and use in the design processes at the KCP prior to the release of the product definition.

J. A. Bradley

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

86

Schneider Electric ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Schneider Electric Schneider Electric ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to Schneider Electric As a global specialist in energy management, Schneider Electric's ESCO division was established in 1992 and has completed over 450 Energy Our Values: Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) nationwide. We are approaching We listen and seek to nearly one billion dollars in performance guarantees, and our projects understand our clients and typically achieve savings that are 12% over and above the annual business partners. guarantee. Schneider Electric's success in ESPCs is largely attributed to our ISO 9001:2008 certified processes in place, ensuring we deliver our We are collaborative, both externally and internally. high performance projects in the most accelerated timeframe possible

87

GENERAL TECHNICAL BASE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

General General Technical Base Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2012 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ iii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

88

NUCLEAR SAFETY SPECIALIST QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Nuclear Safety Specialist Qualification Standard Reference Guide AUGUST 2008 This page is intentionally blank. i Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ vi PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

89

Fire Protection Engineering Qualification Standard Reference Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fire Protection Fire Protection Engineering Qualification Standard Reference Guide SEPTEMBER 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. ii PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................................1 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE.......................................................................................................................................1 TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES................................................................................................3

90

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Industrial Industrial Hygiene Qualification Standard Reference Guide DECEMBER 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

91

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Construction Construction Management Qualification Standard Reference Guide August 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ vi PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

92

RADIATION PROTECTION QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Radiation Radiation Protection Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2009 ii This page intentionally left blank iii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS and SYMBOLS ................................................................. v PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

93

AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Safety Officer Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2010 i This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents ii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iii ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

94

Siemens Government Services ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fact sheet outlines the energy service company (ESCO) qualification for Siemens Government Services in relation to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) energy savings performance contracts (ESPC).

95

TECHNICAL TRAINING QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Technical Training Qualification Standard Reference Guide December 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

96

WEAPONS QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Weapon Weapon Quality Assurance Qualification Standard Reference Guide AUGUST 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

97

SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Security Qualification Standard Reference Guide OCTOBER 2010 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ vi PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 1

98

CRITICALITY SAFETY QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2010 Page 1 of 47 9, 2010 Page 1 of 47 Criticality Safety Qualification Standard Reference Guide 2010 For use with DOE-STD 1173-2009, CRITICALITY SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD September 9, 2010 Page 2 of 47 PURPOSE....................................................................................................................... 5 SCOPE............................................................................................................................ 5 1. Criticality safety personnel must demonstrate a working-level knowledge of the fission process. .......................................................................................................... 6 2. Criticality safety personnel must demonstrate a working-level knowledge of the

99

FAQS Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager FAQS Qualification Card - Senior Technical Safety Manager A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SeniorTechnicalSafetyManager.docx Description Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Card

100

Seismic equipment qualification at Rocky Flats Plant: Lessons learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Seismic equipment qualification is being evaluated as a part of the Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) at Rocky Flats Plant (RFP). Initially it was believed that the experience database developed by the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) for commercial nuclear power plants, as outlined in their Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP), would provide a substantial benefit for the seismic adequacy verification of equipment at RFP. However, further review of the simplified guidelines contained in the GIP with respect to the specific RFP structures and components revealed substantial differences from the GIP criteria. Therefore, the number of ``outliers`` from the experience database defined in the GIP is greater than was initially anticipated. This paper presents details of the differences found between the RFP structures and components and those represented in the GIP, and the challenges presented for their evaluation at RFP. Approaches necessary to develop seismic verification data are also discussed. The discussions focus on experience with one of the nuclear facilities at RFP, Building 707. However, the conclusions are generally applicable to other similar facilities that typically comprise the RFP nuclear facilities.

Peregoy, W.; Herring, K.

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Qualifications | Y-12 National Security Complex  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Qualifications Qualifications Qualifications The America's Veterans to Tennessee Engineers STEM initiative is for military members just completing their service but still on active duty who want to be nuclear, chemical, mechanical, electrical or civil engineers. To be admitted to the program, participants must: have a high school diploma or equivalent, be departing the service with an "Honorable" discharge, be able to meet admission standards of the chosen institution of higher learning, be responsible for their own financial and logistical support, and provide any and all documentation needed by the Selection Committee and the participating academic institutions. In addition, applicants are desired to have: just completed their service but still on active duty or serving in

102

ASSESSMENT OF SRSO TRAINING & QUALIFICATION PROGRAM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ASSESSMENT OF SRSO TRAINING & QUALIFICATION PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF SRSO TRAINING & QUALIFICATION PROGRAM This self assessment evaluates the effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP). The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self- assessments and determines if further action is necessary on a Departmental level. Federal Technical Capability: LOIs a. FTC-1. Executive Commitment and Line Management Ownership. Line management is actively involved in all aspects of technical employee recruitment, retention, development, and deployment. 1.1 Line managers are aware of the requirements and administrative flexibilities associated with recruiting, hiring, and retaining high-quality technical employees. 1.2 Senior line management supports the continuous technical

103

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

56-2011 56-2011 June 2011 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. (Unclassified Unlimited) DOE-STD-1156-2011 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1156-2011 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT v PURPOSE 1 APPLICABILITY 1 IMPLEMENTATION 2 EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS 3 INITIAL QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING 5

104

Financial Assistance Certification Financial Assistance Qualification Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Financial Assistance Certification Financial Assistance Certification Financial Assistance Qualification Standards Financial assistance award and administration in DOE is performed primarily by contract specialists. The Office of Personnel Management qualification standards for GS- 1 102 contract specialists are relevant but not fully sufficient for performing financial assistance duties. Contract specialists performing financial assistance in addition to, or in place of, acquisition duties must also meet the certification requirements established by the Financial Assistance Career Development (FACD) program. The FACD Program is built upon the skills acquired by the contract specialists in the performance of their acquisition duties and the training provided under the Contracting/Purchasing certification program.

105

Siemens Government Services ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ESCO Qualification Sheet ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to Siemens Government Services Siemens Government Services, Inc. (SGS) is a certified Energy Services Company (ESCO) by the Department of Energy to deliver Energy Savings Performance Contacting (ESPC) projects. SGS offers its customers the full range of Siemens advanced energy technologies along with a national and international service network of energy and environmental expert resources. As a single source provider, we are uniquely positioned to integrate and deliver Siemens energy expertise with advanced technologies, distributed delivery, engineered solutions and guaranteed savings performance. SGS as a prime contractor provides program management and contract compliant functions to ensure the timely

106

AGC-2 Irradiation Data Qualification Final Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Graphite Technology Development Program will run a series of six experiments to quantify the effects of irradiation on nuclear grade graphite. The second Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) experiment (AGC-2) began with Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Cycle 149A on April 12, 2011, and ended with ATR Cycle 151B on May 5, 2012. The purpose of this report is to qualify AGC-2 irradiation monitoring data following INL Management and Control Procedure 2691, Data Qualification. Data that are Qualified meet the requirements for data collection and use as described in the experiment planning and quality assurance documents. Data that do not meet the requirements are Failed. Some data may not quite meet the requirements, but may still provide some useable information. These data are labeled as Trend. No Trend data were identified for the AGC-2 experiment. All thermocouples functioned throughout the AGC-2 experiment. There was one instance where spurious signals or instrument power interruption resulted in a recorded temperature value being well outside physical reality. This value was identified and labeled as Failed data. All other temperature data are Qualified. All helium and argon gas flow data are within expected ranges. Total gas flow was approximately 50 sccm through the capsule. Helium gas flow was briefly increased to 100 sccm during reactor shutdown. All gas flow data are Qualified. At the start of the experiment, moisture in the outflow gas line increased to 200 ppmv then declined to less than 10 ppmv over a period of 5 days. This increase in moisture coincides with the initial heating of the experiment and drying of the system. Moisture slightly exceeded 10 ppmv three other times during the experiment. While these moisture values exceed the 10 ppmv threshold value, the reported measurements are considered accurate and to reflect moisture conditions in the capsule. All moisture data are Qualified. Graphite creep specimens are subjected to one of three loads, 393 lbf, 491 lbf, or 589 lbf. Loads were consistently within 5% of the specified values throughout the experiment. Stack displacement increased consistently throughout the experiment with total displacement ranging from 1 to 1.5 inches. No anomalous values were identified. During reactor outages, a set of pneumatic rams are used to raise the stacks of graphite creep specimens to ensure the specimens have not become stuck within the test train. This stack raising was performed after all cycles when the capsule was in the reactor. All stacks were raised successfully after each cycle. The load and displacement data are Qualified

Laurence C. Hull

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Manager | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Manager Manager FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Manager A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-AviationManager.docx Description Aviation Manager Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Safety Officer

108

FAQS Qualification Card - Fire Protection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fire Protection Fire Protection FAQS Qualification Card - Fire Protection A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-FireProtection-2007.docx Description Fire Protection Qualification Card - 2007 FAQC-FireProtection-2000.docx Description Fire Protection Qualification Card - 2000

109

FAQS Qualification Card - Technical Program Manager | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Manager Program Manager FAQS Qualification Card - Technical Program Manager A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-TechnicalProgramManager.docx Description Technical Program Manager Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Occupational Safety

110

FAQS Qualification Card - Chemical Processing | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chemical Processing Chemical Processing FAQS Qualification Card - Chemical Processing A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-ChemicalProcessing.docx Description Chemical Processing Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Chemical Processing

111

FAQS Qualification Card - Waste Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Management Waste Management FAQS Qualification Card - Waste Management A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-WasteManagement.docx Description Waste Management Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - General Technical Base

112

FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environment Compliance Environment Compliance FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-EnvironmentalCompliance.docx Description Environment Compliance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base

113

FAQS Qualification Card - Facility Representative | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Representative Representative FAQS Qualification Card - Facility Representative A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-FacilityRepresentative.docx Description Facility Representative Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Facility Representative

114

FAQS Qualification Card - Technical Training | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Training FAQS Qualification Card - Technical Training A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-TechnicalTraining.docx Description Technical Training Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Occupational Safety

115

FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Safety Officer | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Officer Safety Officer FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Safety Officer A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-AviationSafetyOfficer.docx Description Aviation Safety Officer Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Aviation Manager

116

FAQS Qualification Card - Emergency Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management Emergency Management FAQS Qualification Card - Emergency Management A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-EmergencyManagement.docx Description Emergency Management Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Environmental Restoration

117

Protective Force Firearms Qualifications Courses, July 2011 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Protective Force Firearms Qualifications Courses, July 2011 Protective Force Firearms Qualifications Courses, July 2011 Protective Force Firearms Qualifications Courses, July 2011 July 2011 Firearms Qualifications Courses To describe the process by which U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) protective force (PF) firearms qualification courses are developed, reviewed, revised,validated, and approved. The process described herein applies to all PF firearms policy development participants; notably, the staff of the DOE Office of Security (HS-50), the DOE National Training Center (NTC) (HS-70), the DOE Firearms Policy Panel (FPP), the DOE Protective Forces Safety Committee (PFSC), the DOE Training Managers' Working Group (TMWG), the DOE Training Advisory Committee

118

FAQS Qualification Card - Criticality Safety | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Criticality Safety Criticality Safety FAQS Qualification Card - Criticality Safety A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-CriticalitySafety.docx Description Criticality Safety Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Criticality Safety

119

FAQS Qualification Card - Mechanical Systems | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mechanical Systems Mechanical Systems FAQS Qualification Card - Mechanical Systems A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-MechanicalSystems.docx Description Mechanical Systems Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Mechanical Systems

120

FAQS Qualification Card - Construction Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Construction Management Construction Management FAQS Qualification Card - Construction Management A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-ConstructionManagement.docx Description Construction Management Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Construction Management

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

FAQS Qualification Card - Radiation Protection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Radiation Protection Radiation Protection FAQS Qualification Card - Radiation Protection A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-RadiationProtection.docx Description Radiation Protection Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Radiation Protection

122

Protocol, Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program - May 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program - May Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program - May 2011 Protocol, Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program - May 2011 May 2011 Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program This Qualification Standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for personnel assigned as Site Leads in the Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. Satisfactory and documented completion of the competency requirements contained in this Standard ensures that employees possess the minimum requisite competence to fulfill their functional area duties and responsibilities. This Standard is integrated with existing qualification standards developed by DOE in accordance with DOE Order 426.1, Federal Technical Capability. Protocol, Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program - May 2011

123

Functional Area Qualification Standard Job Task Analyses  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FAQS Job Task Analyses are performed on the Function Area Qualification Standards. The FAQS Job Task Analyses consists of: Developing a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job such as the duties and responsibilities which include determining their levels of importance and frequency. Identifying and evaluating competencies. Last step is evaluating linkage between job tasks and competencies.

124

Short Implants Might be a Predictable Treatment Alternative to Long Implants Which Often Require Additional Augmentation Procedures  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Article Title and Bibliographic Information Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Stanford CM, CooperLF. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27(6):1323-31. Reviewers Sung-Kiang Chuang, DMD, MD, DMSc, Chun-Teh Lee, DDS, MS Purpose/Question The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there was a significant difference in the survival of short implants (?8.5mm) and longer implants for the management of posterior partial edentulism Source of Funding Information not available (The authors declared no conflicts of interest in the acknowledgment section) Type of Study/Design Systematic review with meta-analysis of data Level of Evidence Level 2: Limited-quality, patient-oriented evidence Strength of Recommendation Grade Grade B: Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence

Sung-Kiang Chuang; Chun-Teh Lee

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Instrumentation and Control Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1162-2013 June 2013 DOE STANDARD INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1162-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ ii DOE-STD-1162-2013 APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

126

Criticality Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1173-2009 April 2009 DOE STANDARD CRITICALITY SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1173-2009 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1173-2009 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

127

Safeguards and Security Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-2009 1-2009 May 2009 DOE STANDARD SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1171-2009 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1171-2009 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

128

RERTR Fuel Developmemt and Qualification Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In late 2003 it became evident that U-Mo aluminum fuels under development exhibited significant fuel performance problems under the irradiation conditions required for conversion of most high-powered research reactors. Solutions to the fuel performance issue have been proposed and show promise in early testing. Based on these results, a Reduced Enrichment Research and Test Reactor (RERTR) program strategy has been mapped to allow generic fuel qualification to occur prior to the end of FY10 and reactor conversion to occur prior to the end of FY14. This strategy utilizes a diversity of technologies, test conditions, and test types. Scoping studies using miniature fuel plates will be completed in the time frame of 2006-2008. Irradiation of larger specimens will occur in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) in the United States, the Belgian Reactor-2 (BR2) reactor in Belgium, and in the OSIRIS reactor in France in 2006-2009. These scoping irradiation tests provide a large amount of data on the performance of advanced fuel types under irradiation and allow the down selection of technology for larger scale testing during the final stages of fuel qualification. In conjunction with irradiation testing, fabrication processes must be developed and made available to commercial fabricators. The commercial fabrication infrastructure must also be upgraded to ensure a reliable low enriched uranium (LEU) fuel supply. Final qualification of fuels will occur in two phases. Phase I will obtain generic approval for use of dispersion fuels with density less than 8.5 g-U/cm3. In order to obtain this approval, a larger scale demonstration of fuel performance and fabrication technology will be necessary. Several Materials Test Reactor (MTR) plate-type fuel assemblies will be irradiated in both the High Flux Reactor (HFR) and the ATR (other options include the BR2 and Russian Research Reactor, Dmitrovgrad, Russia [MIR] reactors) in 2008-2009. Following postirradiation examination, a report detailing very-high density fuel behavior will be submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Assuming acceptable fuel behavior, it is anticipated that NRC will issue a Safety Evaluation Report granting generic approval of the developed fuels based on the qualification report. It is anticipated that Phase I of fuel qualification will be completed prior to the end of FY10. Phase II of the fuel qualification requires development of fuels with density greater than 8.5 g-U/cm3. This fuel is required to convert the remaining few reactors that have been identified for conversion. The second phase of the fuel qualification effort includes both dispersion fuels with fuel particle volume loading on the order of 65 percent, and monolithic fuels. Phase II presents a larger set of technical unknowns and schedule uncertainties than phase I. The final step in the fuel qualification process involves insertion of lead test elements into the converting reactors. Each reactor that plans to convert using the developed high-density fuels will develop a reactor specific conversion plan based upon the reactor safety basis and operating requirements. For some reactors (FRM-II, High-Flux Isotope Reactor [HFIR], and RHF) conversion will be a one-step process. In addition to the U.S. fuel development effort, a Russian fuel development strategy has been developed. Contracts with Russian Federation institutes in support of fuel development for Russian are in place.

Dan Wachs

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Preliminary Assessment of the Hanford Tank Waste Feed Acceptance and Product Qualification Programs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (EM) is engaging the national laboratories to provide the scientific and technological rigor to support EM program and project planning, technology development and deployment, project execution, and assessment of program outcomes. As an early demonstration of this new responsibility, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) have been chartered to implement a science and technology program addressing Hanford Tank waste feed acceptance and product qualification. As a first step, the laboratories examined the technical risks and uncertainties associated with the planned waste feed acceptance and qualification testing for Hanford tank wastes. Science and technology gaps were identified for work associated with 1) feed criteria development with emphasis on identifying the feed properties and the process requirements, 2) the Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) process qualification program, and 3) the WTP HLW glass product qualification program. Opportunities for streamlining the accetpance and qualification programs were also considered in the gap assessment. Technical approaches to address the science and technology gaps and/or implement the opportunities were identified. These approaches will be further refined and developed as strong integrated teams of researchers from national laboratories, contractors, industry, and academia are brought together to provide the best science and technology solutions. Pursuing the identified approaches will have immediate and long-term benefits to DOE in reducing risks and uncertainties associated with tank waste removal and preparation, transfers from the tank farm to the WTP, processing within the WTP Pretreatment Facility, and in producing qualified HLW glass products. Additionally, implementation of the identified opportunities provides the potential for long-term cost savings given the anticipated facility life of WTP.

Herman, C. C.; Adamson, Duane J.; Herman, D. T.; Peeler, David K.; Poirier, Micheal R.; Reboul, S. H.; Stone, M. E.; Peterson, Reid A.; Chun, Jaehun; Fort, James A.; Vienna, John D.; Wells, Beric E.

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

General Technical Base Qualification Equivalencies Based On Previous  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

General Technical Base Qualification Equivalencies Based On General Technical Base Qualification Equivalencies Based On Previous Experience, 12/12/95 General Technical Base Qualification Equivalencies Based On Previous Experience, 12/12/95 "The header lists the general field of experience, Commercial Nuclear Power or Navy Nuclear Power Program, with all other categories under these two areas. The subheader lists the position title of the military or job category within that industry. The next level lists the qualification standard subject with the competencies associated with it listed below. To locate the equivalencies that you may claim, locate the position title of your prior military or job category, then find the qualification standards and listed competencies that apply to your current position. The competencies listed below the qualification standards are those you

131

FAQS Qualification Card - Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Card - Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Qualification Card - Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight FAQS Qualification Card - Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-ElectricalSystemsAndSafetyOversight .docx Description Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Qualification Card

132

FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SafeguardsandSecurityGTB.docx Description Safeguards and Security General Technical Base Qualification Card

133

Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1150-2013 December 2013 DOE STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1150-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program

134

Request for Qualifications for Sacramento Landfill  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) solicits experienced companies to design, permit, finance, build, and operate a solar photovoltaic farm (SPV Farm) on the City of Sacramentos 28th Street Landfill. Respondents to this RFQ must demonstrate experience and capacity to design, permit, finance, build, and operate a SPV Farm that generates electricity that can be sold for electrical use through a power-purchase agreement. Submittals must be prepared and delivered in accordance with the requirements set forth in this document.

135

FAQS Qualification Card - Weapon Quality Assurance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Weapon Quality Assurance Weapon Quality Assurance FAQS Qualification Card - Weapon Quality Assurance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-WeaponQualityAssurance.docx Description Weapon Quality Assurance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1025-2008

136

October 2010, Facility Representative Qualification Standard Reference Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Facility Representative Qualification Standard Reference Guide OCTOBER 2010 Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ vi PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

137

Mechanical Systems Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1161-2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mechanical Systems Mechanical Systems Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1161-2008 August 2012 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program (TQP). Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to Patrick C. Romero, Deputy TQP Manager, Office of Leadership and Career Management, NNSA Albuquerque Complex, 505.845.6371. This page is intentionally blank. ii Table of Contents FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... v TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... vii

138

FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safeguards and Security Safeguards and Security FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SafeguardsandSecurity.docx Description Safeguards and Security Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Job Task Analyses - Safeguards and Security

139

FAQS Qualification Card - Safety Software Quality Assurance | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Software Quality Assurance Safety Software Quality Assurance FAQS Qualification Card - Safety Software Quality Assurance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SafetySoftwareQualityAssurance.docx Description Safety Software Quality Assurance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

140

FAQS Qualification Card - Instrumentation and Control | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Instrumentation and Control Instrumentation and Control FAQS Qualification Card - Instrumentation and Control A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-InstrumentationAndControl.docx Description Instrumentation and Control Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Safety Specialist | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Safety Specialist Nuclear Safety Specialist FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Safety Specialist A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-NuclearSafetySpecialist-2007.docx Description Nuclear Safety Specialist Qualification Card - 2007 FAQC-NuclearSafetySpecialist-2004.docx

142

FAQS Qualification Card - General Technical Base | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

General Technical Base General Technical Base FAQS Qualification Card - General Technical Base A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-GeneralTechnicalBase-2007.docx Description General Technical Base Qualification Card - 2007 FAQC-GeneralTechnicalBase-2001.docx Description

143

FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Explosive Safety Study | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Nuclear Explosive Safety Study FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Explosive Safety Study A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-NuclearExplosiveSafetyStudy.docx Description Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

144

FAQS Qualification Card - Deactivation and Decommissioning | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deactivation and Decommissioning Deactivation and Decommissioning FAQS Qualification Card - Deactivation and Decommissioning A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-DeactivationDecommissioning.docx Description Deactivation and Decommissioning Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

145

FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Operations Specialist | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Operations Specialist Nuclear Operations Specialist FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Operations Specialist A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-NuclearOperationsSpecialist.docx Description Nuclear Operations Specialist Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

146

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Livermore Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia Site Office

147

FAQS Qualification Card - Civil Structural Engineering | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Civil Structural Engineering Civil Structural Engineering FAQS Qualification Card - Civil Structural Engineering A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-CivilStructuralEngineering.docx Description Civil Structural Engineering Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

148

FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safeguards and Security General Safeguards and Security General Technical Base FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-SafeguardsandSecurityGTB.docx Description Safeguards and Security General Technical Base Qualification Card

149

FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Technical Training | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Description Technical Training Gap Analysis Qualification Card More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1179-2004 DOE-HDBK-1078-94 FAQS Reference Guide - Technical Training...

150

Defense Program Equivalencies for Technical Qualification Standard Competencies12/12/1995  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Defense Programs has undertaken an effort to compare the competencies in the GeneralTechnical Base Qualification Standard and the Functional Area Qualification Standards withvarious positions in...

151

Qualification requirements of guided ultrasonic waves for inspection of piping in light water reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

It is anticipated that guided ultrasonic wave (GUW) techniques will eventually see widespread application in the nuclear power industry as there are several near-term and future needs that could benefit from the availability of GUW technologies. Already, GUW techniques are receiving consideration for inspecting buried piping at nuclear power plants and future applications may include several Class 1 and 2 components. To accept the results of a nondestructive examination of safety critical components, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission requires that the examinations be performed using qualified equipment, personnel, and procedures. As the use of GUW techniques becomes more frequent, qualification may be required. Performance demonstration has been the approach to qualifying conventional NDE methods in the nuclear power industry. This paper highlights potential issues and research needs associated with facilitating GUW qualification for the nuclear power industry. Parametric studies of essential inspection parameters are necessary to understand their influence on inspection performance. The large volume sampling capability introduces several challenges for qualifying GUW techniques including the quantification of performance, potential interference caused by the presence of multiple flaws in the inspection region, and the practicality of manufacturing several large qualification specimens. Computer simulation may have a significant role in reducing the experimental burden associated with qualifying GUW techniques for nuclear power plant examinations.

Meyer, R. M.; Ramuhalli, P.; Doctor, S. R. [Applied Physics, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352 (United States); Bond, L. J. [Center for Nondestructive Evaluation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 (United States)

2013-01-25T23:59:59.000Z

152

Qualification Plus: Performance and Durability Tests Beyond IEC 61215 (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Qualification Plus is an accelerated test protocol and quality management system that gives higher confidence in field performance of PV modules compared with conventional qualification testing. The test sequences are being developed as consensus standards, but the early publication of these tests enables the community to begin benefiting from them sooner.

Kurtz, S.; Jordan, J.; Kempe, M.; Miller, D.; Bosco, N.; Silverman, T.; Hacke, P.; Phillips, N.; Earnest, T.; Romero, R.

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

Department for Education Assessment, Curriculum and General Qualifications  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Department for Education Assessment, Curriculum and General Qualifications Reform Group Level 6 and General Qualifications Reform Group 2 St Paul's Place 125 Norfolk Street Sheffield, S1 2FJ Dear Mrs Ward National Curriculum Reform (England): Key Stage 4 Science I am writing in response to your current

Rambaut, Andrew

154

Radiation Protection Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1174-2013 November 2013 DOE STANDARD RADIATION PROTECTION FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1174-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ ii ii DOE-STD-1174-2013 INTENTIONALLY BLANK iv DOE-STD-1174-2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL.....................................................................................................................................iii TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................v

155

Pepco Energy Services ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC INTRODUCTION TO PEPCO ENERGY SERVICES, INC. Pepco Energy Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (PHI), is a Fortune 500 energy-focused company and has successfully completed over $750 Million worth of energy performance contracts for over 300 clients - including higher education institutions, primary and secondary schools, hospitals, and local and federal governments. Pepco Energy Services is further distinguished as having been awarded the single, largest performance contract ever by the Federal Government: a $62 Million project that was completed for the five military installations that comprise the Military District of Washington (located in

156

Industrial Hygiene Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

38-2007 38-2007 November 2007 DOE STANDARD INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1138-2007 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1138-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1138-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ....................................................................................................iii PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................

157

Nuclear Safety Specialist Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

83-2007 83-2007 November 2007 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR SAFETY SPECIALIST FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1183-2007 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1183-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1183-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................9

158

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Northwest

159

Approval Memorandum, Additional Qualification Courses of Fire - December  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Approval Memorandum, Additional Qualification Courses of Fire - Approval Memorandum, Additional Qualification Courses of Fire - December 13, 2011 Approval Memorandum, Additional Qualification Courses of Fire - December 13, 2011 December 13, 2011 Request approval of revised courses of fire. As indicated in the background section of the memorandum, subjects: Newly Developed SECURITY Policy Officer/Special Response Team Qualification Courses of Fire, dated October 12,2011, members of the Department of Energy (DOE) Firearms Policy Panel, DOE Training Managers Working Group, the National Nuclear Security Administration, and the DOE National Training Center have devloped , reviewed and revised the following courses of fire (attached) for inclusion in the Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses Manual. The courses of fire pertain to the incubent Security Police

160

Memorandum, Additional Approved Qualification Courses of Fire - September  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Memorandum, Additional Approved Qualification Courses of Fire - Memorandum, Additional Approved Qualification Courses of Fire - September 23, 2011 Memorandum, Additional Approved Qualification Courses of Fire - September 23, 2011 September 23, 2011 Newly developed Security Police Officer/Special Response Team Qualification Courses of Fire In accordance with DOE Order 473.2 Protection Program Operations , Section E , paragraph 2 and Section K, Paragraph 2, members of the Department of Energy (DOE) Firearms Policy Panel, DOE Protective Forces Safety Committee, DOE Trainin Managers Working Group, the National Nuclear Security Administration, and the DOE National Training Center have developed, reviewed and revised the following courses of fire (attached) for inclusion in the Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses Manual. The courses

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Staubli TX-90XL robot qualification at the LLIHE.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Light Initiated High Explosive (LIHE) Facility uses a robotic arm to spray explosive material onto test items for impulse tests. In 2007, the decision was made to replace the existing PUMA 760 robot with the Staubli TX-90XL. A qualification plan was developed and implemented to verify the safe operating conditions and failure modes of the new system. The robot satisfied the safety requirements established in the qualification plan. A performance issue described in this report remains unresolved at the time of this publication. The final readiness review concluded the qualification of this robot at the LIHE facility.

Covert, Timothy Todd

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

162

Defense Program Equivalencies for Technical Qualification Standard Competencies  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 1995 2, 1995 MEMORANDUM FOR Distribution FROM: Thomas W. Evans Technical Personnel Program Coordinator SUBJECT: Defense Program Equivalencies for Technical Qualification Standard Competencies Defense Programs has undertaken an effort to compare the competencies in the General Technical Base Qualification Standard and the Functional Area Qualification Standards with various positions in the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program and the commercial nuclear industry. The purpose of this effort is to determine if equivalencies can be granted for competencies based on previous training and experience in these areas. The equivalency crosswalk was developed by subject matter experts who held positions in the Navy and/or the commercial nuclear power program. To date, equivalencies have been

163

Development of generic floor response spectra for equipment qualification for seismic loads  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A generic floor response spectra has been developed for use in the qualification of electrical and mechanical equipment in operating nuclear power plants. Actual PWR and BWR - Mark I structural models were used as representative of a class of structures. For each model, the stiffness properties were varied, with the same mass, so as to extend the fundamental base structure natural frequency from 2 cps to 36 cps. This resulted in fundamental mode coupled natural frequencies as low as 0.86 cps and as high as 30 cps. The characteristics of 1000 floor response spectra were studied to determine the generic spectra. A procedure for its application to any operating plant has been established. The procedure uses as much or as little information that currently exists at the plant relating to the question of equipment qualification. A generic floor response spectra is proposed for the top level of a generic structure. Reduction factors are applied to the peak acceleration for equipment at lower levels.

Curreri, J.R.; Costantino, C.J.

1984-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

FPL Energy Services ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FPL Energy Services, Inc. FPL Energy Services, Inc. ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to FPL Energy Services, Inc. (FPLES) * Company Background FPL Energy Services, Inc. (FPLES) offers a highly qualified staff of professional engineers to meet and deliver on the broad spectrum of ESPC requirements and understands the unique needs of government facilities at the federal, state and local level. With over 25 years experience in the energy conservation and management business, and more than 22 of those years concentrated in providing performance contracting, we go above and beyond to deliver optimized customer solutions. We've cracked the code on establishing and maintaining customer relationships. With over 80% of our projects resulting in additional phases, we have a clear understanding of our customer's needs and

165

Facility Representative Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1151-2010 October 2010 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1151-2010 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Approved DOE Technical Standards Web Site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/standard/standard.html DOE-STD-1151-2010 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is

166

Aviation Safety Officer Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

64-2003 64-2003 September 2003 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 January 2010 DOE STANDARD AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1164-2003 CH-1 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1164-2003 CH-1 iv List of Changes Page/paragraph Change Page ii Change to new FAQS format Page iii Change in approval signature Page iv Added list of changes Page v Updated Table of Contents Page vii Changes to organizational names and

167

Chevron Energy Solutions Company ESCO Qualification Sheet  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chevron Energy Solutions Company, Chevron Energy Solutions Company, a Division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. ESCO Qualification Sheet DOE Super ESPC Introduction to Chevron Energy Solutions Chevron is a $165 billion U.S. Fortune 3 company employing more than 64,000 professionals in 180 countries. With a Standard and Poor's AA investment-grade credit rating, it is the second-largest U.S.-based energy company and the fourth largest publicly-traded integrated energy company in the world, based on market capitalization. Established in 2000, Chevron ES is one of the most reputable and successful energy services companies in the market, having completed nearly $2 billion in performance contracts with a current annual guaranteed savings portfolio of nearly $317 million. Chevron ES offers customized, comprehensive products and services that help

168

FTCP Functional Area Qualification Standards - TEMPLATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-XXXX-20XX Draft: Month Year DOE STANDARD NAME OF FUNCTIONAL AREA FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program website at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ This FAQS template has been derived from DOE FTCP Operational Plans over the years as a "best practice format" after FTCP member-composed teams have provided valuable recommendations on important FAQS elements. It is expected that the FAQS template be followed wherever possible, and only deviated-from for good reason. FAQS Sponsors should have a written basis

169

Aviation Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1165-2003 September 2003 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 December 2009 DOE STANDARD AVIATION MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1165-2003 CH-1 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1165-2003 CH-1 iv List of Changes Page/paragraph Change Page ii Change to new FAQS format Page iii Change in approval signature Page iv Added list of changes Page v Changes to Table of Contents Page vii Changes to organizational names and

170

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Site Office An accreditation assessment of the National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Technical Qualification Program (TQP) was conducted during the week of October 5-8, 2009. The accreditation of the TQP will enable NSO to demonstrate that they have an effective program in place to ensure the technical competency of the individuals performing these activities. In order to initiate the accreditation process, a comprehensive self-assessment of the TQP against the objectives and supporting criteria is required. This report documents the details and conclusions of that self-assessment. NNSA-NSO TQP Self-Assessment, October 2009

171

SAFETY SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Software Safety Software Quality Assurance Qualification Standard Reference Guide MARCH 2011 This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 1

172

Technical Qualification Program Description - Integrated Support Center, Chicago Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPART ENT of Office of DEPART ENT of Office of ENERGY I Science Integrated Support Center Chicago Office Technical Qualification Program Description ~~~~~~'?£H(.k:1/Zi.':"r'fl. ; ;!. / ; h tJ/ tl oxa nn e E. Purucker, M anager ~ Office of Science - Chicago Office Technical Qualification Program Description Revision 2, November 2010 CONCURRENCE The Office of Science-Chicago Office (SC-CH) is the sponsor for this Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Description. This is applicable to SC-CH, New Brunswick Laboratory (NBLL Ames Site Office (AMSO) and Argonne Site Office (ASO). These offices are in joint participation and endorsement of the SC-CH Technical Qualification Program process and have also provided concurrence below. The SC-CH Manager is the approval authority for this program description.

173

SAFEGUARDS & SECURITY GENERAL TECHNICAL BASE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

&Security General Technical Base Qualification Standard Reference Guide JANUARY 2010 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. v PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

174

ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND SAFETY OVERSIGHT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electrical Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Qualification Standard Reference Guide DECEMBER 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i. i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... viii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ ix PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

175

NNSA PACKAGE CERTIFICATION ENGINEER QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NNSA Package NNSA Package Certification Engineer Qualification Standard Reference Guide FEBRUARY 2010 This page is intentionally blank. i Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

176

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation Transportation & Traffic Management Qualification Standard Reference Guide APRIL 2010 This page is intentionally blank. i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

177

Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Office The purpose of this Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation evaluation was to conduct a thorough, independent evaluation of the status of the implementation of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Sandia Site Office (SSO) TQP and assess the actions taken to correct problems identified in the site self-evaluation report. This report documents the activities of the Accreditation Review Team and the results of its evaluation of the SSO TQP for the Accreditation Board. SSO TQP Accreditation Report More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report - NNSA Service Center

178

Data Qualification Report: Borehole Straigraphic Contacts  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The data set considered here is the borehole stratigraphic contacts data (DTN: M09811MWDGFM03.000) used as input to the Geologic Framework Model. A Technical Assessment method used to evaluate these data with a two-fold approach: (1) comparison to the geophysical logs on which the contacts were, in part, based; and (2) evaluation of the data by mapping individual units using the entire data set. Qualification of the geophysical logs is being performed in a separate activity. A representative subset of the contacts data was chosen based on importance of the contact and representativeness of that contact in the total data set. An acceptance window was established for each contact based on the needs of the data users. Data determined to be within the acceptance window were determined to be adequate for their intended use in three-dimensional spatial modeling and were recommended to be Qualified. These methods were chosen to provide a two-pronged evaluation that examines both the origin and results of the data. The result of this evaluation is a recommendation to qualify all contacts. No data were found to lie outside the pre-determined acceptance window. Where no geophysical logs are available, data were evaluated in relation to surrounding data and by impact assessment. These data are also recommended to be qualified. The stratigraphic contact data contained in this report (Attachment VII; DTN: M00004QGFMPICK.000) are intended to replace the source data, which will remain unqualified.

R.W. Clayton; C. Lum

2000-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

179

Procedural Safeguards  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Procedural Safeguards are protections afforded by the Individuals with...2004...(IDEIA) to each student with a disability and to his or her parents to ensure that the student receives a free and appropriate publi...

Debra Dunn Esq.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

180

Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Standard Reference Guide … October 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1175-2013 October 2013 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program (TQP). Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to the Office of Leadership and Career Management, TQP Manager, NNSA Albuquerque Complex. This page is intentionally blank. ii Table of Contents FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

AGC-3 Irradiation Data Qualification Final Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Graphite Technology Development Program will run a series of six experiments to quantify the effects of irradiation on nuclear grade graphite. The third experiment, Advanced Graphite Creep 3 (AGC 3), began with Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Cycle 152B on November 27, 2012, and ended with ATR Cycle 155B on April 23, 2014. This report documents qualification of AGC 3 experiment irradiation monitoring data for use by the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Technology Development Office (TDO) Program for research and development activities required to design and license the first VHTR nuclear plant. Qualified data meet the requirements for data collection and use as described in the experiment planning and quality assurance documents. Failed data do not meet the requirements. Trend data may not meet the requirements, but may still provide some useable information. All thermocouples (TCs) functioned throughout the AGC 3 experiment. There was one interval between December 18, 2012, and December 20, 2012, where 10 NULL values were reported for various TCs. These NULL values were deleted from the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System database. All temperature data are Qualified for use by the VHTR TDO Program. Argon, helium, and total gas flow data were within expected ranges and are Qualified for use by the VHTR TDO Program. Total gas flow was approximately 50 sccm through the AGC 3 experiment capsule. Helium gas flow was briefly increased to 100 sccm during ATR shutdowns. At the start of the AGC 3 experiment, moisture in the outflow gas line was stuck at a constant value of 335.6174 ppmv for the first cycle (Cycle 152B). When the AGC 3 experiment capsule was reinstalled in ATR for Cycle 154B, a new moisture filter was installed. Moisture data from Cycle 152B are Failed. All moisture data from the final three cycles (Cycles 154B, 155A, and 155B) are Qualified for use by the VHTR TDO Program.

Laurence Hull

2014-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

40 MM Grenade Launcher Qualification Requirements at Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

40 MM Grenade Launcher Qualification Requirements at Department of 40 MM Grenade Launcher Qualification Requirements at Department of Energy Sites, IG-0806 40 MM Grenade Launcher Qualification Requirements at Department of Energy Sites, IG-0806 The Department of Energy and its National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), operate some of the most sensitive Federal facilities in the United States. Because of the mission requirements, safeguards and security is a top priority at these sites. As part of its security regime, the Department maintains a cadre of armed protective force officers to prevent and defend against malevolent acts. In recent years, the Department has worked to enhance security by increasing the capabilities of weapon systems used by the protective force officers. One such weapon is the 40 mm grenade launcher, which utilizes high explosive

183

GENERAL TECHNICAL BASELINE QUALIFICATION STANDARD SUGGESTED STUDY REFERENCES  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References 2007 revision This list provides suggested study references for the technical competencies of the General Technical Base Qualification Standard (DOE STD 1146-2007). More comprehensive resources are available through the DOE Online Learning Center's training courses and the study guides available through the Federal Technical Capability Panel web site. The Uniform Resource Locaters for these sites are listed in the Standard. This list is arranged by Technical Competency, followed by the suggested reference source. Some competencies deal directly with DOE or Federal directives, and they are also the reference. In a few cases, the Study Guide is the only concise source, and appropriate sections are listed.

184

January 13, 2012, Technical Qualification Program, Revision 3 - Sandia Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OF DOCUMENT: OF DOCUMENT: SANDIA SITE OFFICE COORDINATION/APPROVAL SSO CP 0603.03, Technical Qualification Program DESCRIPTION (e.g., summary of changes): Incorporated: (I) changes to governing order (DOE 0 426.1); (2) SSO FR T&Q and CT procedures; (3) recommendations from recent self-assessments. Chan ed re- ualification eriodicity from 3 to 5 ears. REVISION NO.: 3 DATE: 1/11/12 Subject Matter Expert (SME) (name, org., & phone): Allen D. Tate, AMNO 845-4050 COORDINATING/APPROVING ORDER SIGNATURE DATE ORGANIZATION & NAME SME Allen D. Tate Environment, Safety & Health Dan Pellegrino, Assistant Manager Facilities & Projects Mike McFadden, Assistant Manager Nuclear Operations Jim Todd, Assistant Manager, FTCP Agent Safeguards & Security

185

Qualification of HTR pebbles by X-ray tomography and thermal analysis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Knowledge of the TRISO particle distributions inside HTR fuel pebbles or compacts may help manufacturers to improve the quality of their fuel by providing feedback during the development phase. In a joint program, NRG and JRC-IE develop a fast method to obtain these distributions non-destructively, based on X-ray tomography. The coordinates of the individual TRISO particles are extracted from a tomographic reconstruction of a pebble. The particle distributions are then partially characterized by the distributions of nearest neighbor distances. In addition, the temperature distribution during operation is estimated by assigning power to each particle while using the pebble edge temperature as a boundary condition. The whole procedure was applied to 31 pebbles fabricated in the 1980s in the framework of the German HTR fuel qualification program.

P.R. Hania; B. Janssen; A.V. Fedorov; S. Knol; S. de Groot; L. Metten; A. van de Sande; M.A. Ftterer

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Functional Area Qualification Standard Reference Guides | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Services » Assistance » Federal Technical Capability Program » Functional Area Qualification Standard Reference Guides Functional Area Qualification Standard Reference Guides Aviation Manager Aviation Safety Officer Chemical Processing Civil/Structural Engineering Construction Management Criticality Safety Criticality Safety Support Group, NNSA SC Electrical Systems and Safety Oversight Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Restoration Facility Maintenance Management Facility Representative Fire Protection Engineering General Technical Base Industrial Hygiene Instrumentation and Control Mechanical Systems NNSA Package Certification Engineer Nuclear Safety Specialists Occupational Safety Quality Assurance Radiation Protection Safeguards and Security

187

Accelerated Stress Testing, Qualification Testing, HAST, Field Experience  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This presentation, which was the opening session of the NREL 2013 Photovoltaic Module Reliability Workshop held on February 26, 2013 in Golden, CO, was presented by John Wohlgemuth. Entitled "Accelerated Stress Testing, Qualification Testing, HAST, Field Experience -- What Do They All Mean?" the presentation details efforts to develop accelerated stress tests beyond the qualification test levels, which are necessary to predict PV module wear-out. The commercial success of PVs is ultimately based on the long-term reliability and safety of the deployed PV modules.

188

Procedures - 88-Inch Cyclotron  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Procedures Procedures (You must be logged in with your Berkeley Lab LDAP to view the procedures) PUB-3000...

189

CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Civil/ Civil/ Structural Engineering Qualification Standard Reference Guide APRIL 2006 i Table of Contents PURPOSE........................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ................................................................................................................................................ 1 TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES.................................................................................................... 2 1. Civil/structural engineering personnel shall demonstrate an expert-level knowledge of the civil/structural engineering related sections and/or requirements of the following DOE Directive and Guides. ...............................................................................................................................

190

Personnel Selection, Qualification, and Training Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish selection, qualification, and training requirements for management and operating (M&O) contractor personnel involved in the operation, maintenance, and technical support of Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration Category A and B reactors and non-reactor nuclear facilities. Canceled by DOE O 426.2

2001-07-12T23:59:59.000Z

191

Senior Technical Safety Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1175-2013 October 2013 DOE STANDARD SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1175-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://energy.gov/hss/information-center/department-energy-technical-standards-program ii DOE-STD-11 75-2013 APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the Qualification Standard for Department-wide

192

Suggested Equivalencies for General Technical Base Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Base Base Qualification Equivalencies Based On Previous Experience The following information was distributed by Thomas W. Evans (HR 1.5) in a memorandum dated December 12, 1995. The memorandum is on file in DOE-ID Training and if needed can be referenced as "DOE Memorandum, Course Catalog and Competency to Course Matching", dated December 12, 1995. DOE Technical Qualification Program Standards specify competencies that technical DOE employees must possess to accomplish their assigned tasks and activities. These competencies can be gained in a number of ways including through training, education, or prior military or job experience. This material contains lists of the military or job experience and the competencies that were gained as a result of that

193

ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS This document provides guidance and objectives and criteria to support assessments required by DOE O 426.1 Federal Technical Capability (FTC), Section 4. REQUIREMENTS, paragraph b. FTC Program Implementation, subparagraph (7) Self- Assessment. This FTC Order paragraph requires self-assessment of TQP and FTC Program implementation within one's organization. To ensure effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP), Headquarters and field elements conduct self-assessments of these programs. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self-assessments and determines if further action is

194

Safeguards and Security General Technical Base Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23-2009 23-2009 July 2009 DOE STANDARD SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY GENERAL TECHNICAL BASE QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1123-2009 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1123-2009 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

195

Training and Qualification Program at the Saturn Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the Training and Qualification Program at the Saturn Facility. The main energy source at Saturn is the Saturn accelerator which is used to test military hardware for vulnerability to X-rays, as well as to perform various types of plasma radiation source experiments. The facility is operated and maintained by a staff of twenty scientists and technicians. This program is designed to ensure these personnel are adequately trained and qualified to perform their jobs in a safe and efficient manner. Copies of actual documents used in the program are included as appendices. This program meets all the requirements for training and qualification in the DOE Orders on Conduct of Operations and Quality Assurance, and may be useful to other organizations desiring to come into compliance with these orders.

Artman, W.D.; Sullivan, J.J.; De La O, R.V.; Zawadzkas, G.A.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

Training and Qualification Program at the Simulation Technology Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the Training and Qualification Program at the Simulation Technology Laboratory (STL). The main facility at STL is Hermes III, a twenty megavolt accelerator which is used to test military hardware for vulnerability to gamma-rays. The facility is operated and maintained by a staff of twenty engineers and technicians. This program is designed to ensure that these personnel are adequately trained and qualified to perform their jobs in a safe and efficient manner. Copies of actual documents used in the program are included in appendices. This program meets all the requirements for training and qualification in the DOE Orders on Conduct of Operations and Quality Assurance, and may be useful to other organizations desiring to come into compliance with these orders.

Zawadzkas, G.A.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Restoration Functional Area Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Restoration Functional Area Qualification Restoration Functional Area Qualification Job Task Analysis CONDUCTING THE JOB / TASK ANALYSIS Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even if they don't exactly agree with it). - When all values have been assigned, consider as a group deleting tasks

198

Plutonium metal and oxide container weld development and qualification  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Welds were qualified for a container system to be used for long-term storage of plutonium metal and oxide. Inner and outer containers are formed of standard tubing with stamped end pieces gas-tungsten-arc (GTA) welded onto both ends. The weld qualification identified GTA parameters to produce a robust weld that meets the requirements of the Department of Energy standard DOE-STD-3013-94, ``Criteria for the Safe Storage of Plutonium Metals and Oxides.``

Fernandez, R.; Horrell, D.R.; Hoth, C.W.; Pierce, S.W.; Rink, N.A.; Rivera, Y.M.; Sandoval, V.D.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Pacific Northwest Site Office- 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This self-assessment evaluated how well the Technical Qualification and Federal Capability Programs were implemented at the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO).

200

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Office of River Protection- 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A self-assessment was performed in accordance with TRS-OA-IP-07, Management (Self) Assessment, Rev. 2, where information was retrieved from MGT-QT-PL-01, Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Plan, Rev. 3; MGT-QT-DI-01, Technical Qualification Program: Federal Technical Capability Agent Duties, Rev. 2; technical staff electronic training and qualifications files; and ORP's technical staff hard copy training and qualification files to determine the effectiveness of the implemented program and identify any weaknesses of the existing program at turn-over of responsibilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop- Presentations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

These presentations were given at the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop held November 4, 2010 in Livermore, CA.

202

Delegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Delegation Procedures Text Delegation Procedures Delegation Template Text Redelegation Procedures Redelegation Template Delegation Procedures Redelegation Procedures...

203

NNSA Package Certification Engineer Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1026-2009 February 2009 DOE STANDARD NNSA PACKAGE CERTIFICATION ENGINEER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1026-2009 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1026-2009 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1026-2009 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................1

204

Nuclear Explosives Safety Study Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

85-2007 85-2007 September 2007 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE SAFETY STUDY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DRAFT DOE-STD-1185-2007 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DRAFT DOE-STD-1185-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DRAFT DOE-STD-1185-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................1

205

Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard, 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

37-2007 37-2007 December 2007 Supersedes DOE-STD-1137-2000 July 2000 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1137-2007 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1137-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1137-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ..................................................................................................VII PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................

206

Safety Software Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-2011 2-2011 March 2011 DOE STANDARD SAFETY SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1172-2011 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1172-2011 INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1172-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL ............................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................ i

207

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Y-12 Site Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Y-12 Site Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Y-12 Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Y-12 Site Office The National Nuclear Security Administration Y-12 Site Office (YSO) has successfully implemented a Technical Qualification Program (YSO TQP) that produces highly qualified, technical individuals to execute oversight of site activities and support the site missions. The YSO management team considers the YSO TQP to be a significant factor by which the YSO personnel perform their jobs and support the site missions. YSO TQP Self-Assessment, July 2010 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Reaccreditation Report - Y-12 Site Office Independent Activity Report, Savannah River Operation - June 2010

208

Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report, October 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report ASRP-N0-10.2.2012-469406 Title : Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Lead Assessor: James Todd, SSO FTCP Agent Team Members: Shirley Ireland, Dave Rast, Wendy Sawyer, and Allen Tate Self assessnnent ASM-N0-9.13.2012-464813 Number: Dates Conducted: 9/17 -10/12, 2012 Self Asse;ssment Scope This self assessment examined how Sandia Site Office (SSO) executes the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan. Self Asse.ssment Summary The Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program is implemented. Site office technical personnel responsible for providing assistance, guidance, direction, or oversight that could affect

209

Hanford Low Activity Waste (LAW) Fluidized Bed Steam Reformer (FBSR) Na-Al-Si (NAS) Waste Form Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford Low Activity Waste (LAW) Fluidized Bed Steam Hanford Low Activity Waste (LAW) Fluidized Bed Steam Reformer (FBSR) Na-Al-Si (NAS) Waste Form Qualification C.M. Jantzen and E.M. Pierce November 18, 2010 2 Participating Organizations 3 Incentive and Objectives FBSR sodium-aluminosilicate (NAS) waste form has been identified as a promising supplemental treatment technology for Hanford LAW Objectives: Reduce the risk associated with implementing the FBSR NAS waste form as a supplemental treatment technology for Hanford LAW Conduct test with actual tank wastes Use the best science to fill key data gaps Linking previous and new results together 4 Outline FBSR NAS waste form processing scales FBSR NAS waste form data/key assumptions FBSR NAS key data gaps FBSR NAS testing program 5 FBSR NAS Waste Form Processing

210

Trial Run of a Junction-Box Attachment Test for Use in Photovoltaic Module Qualification (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Engineering robust adhesion of the junction-box (j-box) is a hurdle typically encountered by photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturers during product development and manufacturing process control. There are historical incidences of adverse effects (e.g., fires), caused when the j-box/adhesive/module system has failed in the field. The addition of a weight to the j-box during the 'damp-heat', 'thermal-cycle', or 'creep' tests within the IEC qualification protocol is proposed to verify the basic robustness of the adhesion system. The details of the proposed test are described, in addition to a trial run of the test procedure. The described experiments examine 4 moisture-cured silicones, 4 foam tapes, and a hot-melt adhesive used in conjunction with glass, KPE, THV, and TPE substrates. For the purpose of validating the experiment, j-boxes were adhered to a substrate, loaded with a prescribed weight, and then subjected to aging. The replicate mock-modules were aged in an environmental chamber (at 85 deg C/85% relative humidity for 1000 hours; then 100 degrees C/<10% relative humidity for 200 hours) or fielded in Golden, Miami, and Phoenix for 1 year. Attachment strength tests, including pluck and shear test geometries, were also performed on smaller component specimens.

Miller, D.; Deibert, S.; Wohlgemuth, J.

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Student Policies & Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Student Policies & Procedures summer.uci.edu #12;STUDENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Rev. 04/2014 1 ...................................................................................... 9 #12;STUDENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Rev. 04/2014 2 Who Summer Session Serves Current UCI Students

Barrett, Jeffrey A.

212

Contract and Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This paper examines both the theoretical underpinnings and empirical picture of procedural contracts. Procedural contracts may be understood as contracts in which parties regulate not merely their commercial relations but also the procedures...

Drahozal, Christopher R.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

DEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATION AND DISPOSAL OF AN ALTERNATIVE IMMOBILIZED LOW-ACTIVITY WASTE FORM AT THE HANFORD SITE  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Demonstrating that a waste form produced by a given immobilization process is chemically and physically durable as well as compliant with disposal facility acceptance criteria is critical to the success of a waste treatment program, and must be pursued in conjunction with the maturation of the waste processing technology. Testing of waste forms produced using differing scales of processing units and classes of feeds (simulants versus actual waste) is the crux of the waste form qualification process. Testing is typically focused on leachability of constituents of concern (COCs), as well as chemical and physical durability of the waste form. A principal challenge regarding testing immobilized low-activity waste (ILAW) forms is the absence of a standard test suite or set of mandatory parameters against which waste forms may be tested, compared, and qualified for acceptance in existing and proposed nuclear waste disposal sites at Hanford and across the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. A coherent and widely applicable compliance strategy to support characterization and disposal of new waste forms is essential to enhance and accelerate the remediation of DOE tank waste. This paper provides a background summary of important entities, regulations, and considerations for nuclear waste form qualification and disposal. Against this backdrop, this paper describes a strategy for meeting and demonstrating compliance with disposal requirements emphasizing the River Protection Project (RPP) Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) at the Hanford Site and the fluidized bed steam reforming (FBSR) mineralized low-activity waste (LAW) product stream.

SAMS TL; EDGE JA; SWANBERG DJ; ROBBINS RA

2011-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

214

Experience with the implementation of a risk-based ISI program and inspection qualification  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Rolls Royce and Associates (RRA) are the Design Authority (DA) for Nuclear Steam Raising Plant (NSRP) used for the Royal Naval Nuclear Fleet. Over the past seven years RRA, with support from the Ministry of Defense, has developed and implemented a risk based in-service inspection (RBISI) strategy for the NSRP. Having used risk as a means of optimizing where to inspect, an inspection qualification (IQ) process has now been put in place to ensure that proposed inspections deliver the expected gains assumed. This qualification process follows very closely that currently being put forward by the European Network on Inspection Qualification (ENIQ).

Chapman, O.J.V. [Rolls Royce and Associates Ltd., Derby (United Kingdom)

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

IDEAReauthorized Statute PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

IDEA­Reauthorized Statute PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS: SURROGATES, NOTICE AND CONSENT (See also Changes addresses only the changes to IDEA provisions regarding procedural safeguards related to notice to parents the provision of procedural safeguards notices to parents. A copy of the procedural safeguards available

216

Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1185-2007 CHANGE NOTICE No.1 April 2010 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE SAFETY STUDY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1185-2007 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds DOE-STD-1185-2007 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is

217

Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1137-2000 July 2000 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1137-2000 iii APPROVAL DOE-STD-1137-2000 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK

218

Electrical Systems And Safety Oversight Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0-2007 0-2007 August 2007 DOE STANDARD ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND SAFETY OVERSIGHT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1170-2007 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 605-6000 or (800) 553-6847.

219

Senior Technical Safety Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

75-2006 75-2006 i NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1175-2006 October 2006 DOE STANDARD SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1175-2006 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161,

220

EDS V25 containment vessel explosive qualification test report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The V25 containment vessel was procured by the Project Manager, Non-Stockpile Chemical Materiel (PMNSCM) as a replacement vessel for use on the P2 Explosive Destruction Systems. It is the first EDS vessel to be fabricated under Code Case 2564 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, which provides rules for the design of impulsively loaded vessels. The explosive rating for the vessel based on the Code Case is nine (9) pounds TNT-equivalent for up to 637 detonations. This limit is an increase from the 4.8 pounds TNT-equivalency rating for previous vessels. This report describes the explosive qualification tests that were performed in the vessel as part of the process for qualifying the vessel for explosive use. The tests consisted of a 11.25 pound TNT equivalent bare charge detonation followed by a 9 pound TNT equivalent detonation.

Rudolphi, John Joseph

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program Self-Assessment- Chief of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) Report was prepared to summarize the results of the July 2013 CNS self-assessment of the Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program.

222

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Livermore Field Office- 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities.

223

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Sandia Site Office- 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This self assessment examined how Sandia Site Office (SSO) executes the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan.

224

Certification and Listing Process and Procedures Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slides from the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Component and System Qualification Workshop held November 4, 2010 in Livermore, CA.

225

Qualification of New, Commercial Oxide Dispersion-Strengthened Alloys for Use in Advanced Fossil Processes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Qualification of New, Commercial Oxide Qualification of New, Commercial Oxide Dispersion-Strengthened Alloys for Use in Advanced Fossil Processes Background Advanced higher-efficiency power generation plants would typically operate at higher temperatures and pressures than existing fleet, and would require materials that can withstand operations at these higher temperatures and pressures. Special ferritic alloys of iron called oxide dispersion-strengthened (ODS) steel have the

226

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Los Alamos Field Office- 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This self-assessment for the Verification of the Closure of Federal Training & Qualification Deficiencies was conducted to provide Los Alamos Field Office (NA-LA) management specific information related to effectiveness of the closure actions for Federal Training and Qualification (T &Q) deficiencies identified by a recent self-assessment and by a CDNS Biennial review. The conclusion of this assessment is that most deficiencies have corrective actions assigned that are effectively completed and adequately documented.

227

Computerized procedures system  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An online data driven computerized procedures system that guides an operator through a complex process facility's operating procedures. The system monitors plant data, processes the data and then, based upon this processing, presents the status of the current procedure step and/or substep to the operator. The system supports multiple users and a single procedure definition supports several interface formats that can be tailored to the individual user. Layered security controls access privileges and revisions are version controlled. The procedures run on a server that is platform independent of the user workstations that the server interfaces with and the user interface supports diverse procedural views.

Lipner, Melvin H. (Monroeville, PA); Mundy, Roger A. (North Huntingdon, PA); Franusich, Michael D. (Upper St. Clair, PA)

2010-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

228

Microsoft PowerPoint - S08-03_Peeler_Feed Qualification for New Streams.ppt  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Feed Qualification for New Streams Feed Qualification for New Streams to DWPF Connie C. Herman (Presented by David Peeler) Manager, Process Technology Programs Savannah River National Laboratory November 17, 2010 Print Close 2 Feed Qualification for New Streams to DWPF Presentation Outline Overview of High Level Waste System Considerations for Qualification Qualification Process Flowsheet Testing Glass Formulation and Processing Impacts Radioactive Sample Characterization & Verification Print Close 3 Feed Qualification for New Streams to DWPF Waste Removal Grout Vault H Area Tanks F Area Tanks 2F 2H 3H Evaporators Extended Sludge Processing Canisters of Vitrified Glass Saltstone S a l t Salt Processing Tank Closure Tank Farm Storage & Evaporation Waste Removal & Pretreatment Final Processing Washed Sludge Low Level

229

Project 1640 Palomar Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Project 1640 Palomar Procedures Version 0.1 7/7/08 2:11:08 PM #12;2 Project 1640 Design and Operations Table of Contents Project 1640..................................................................................................................... 1 Palomar Procedures

230

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in consultation with CEQ, Federal agency NEPA procedures must meet the standards in the CEQ...

231

"Order Module--DOE O 426.2, PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"To establish selection, training, qualification, and certification requirements for contractor personnel who can impact the safety basis through their involvement in the operation, maintenance,...

232

Fuel qualification plan for the Advanced Neutron Source Reactor  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the development and qualification plan for the fuel for the Advanced Neutron Source. The reference fuel is U{sub 3}Si{sub 2}, dispersed in aluminum and clad in 6061 aluminum. This report was prepared in May 1994, at which time the reference design was for a two-element core containing highly enriched uranium (93% {sup 235}U) . The reactor was in the process of being redesigned to accommodate lowered uranium enrichment and became a three-element core containing a higher volume fraction of uranium enriched to 50% {sup 235}U. Consequently, this report was not issued at that time and would have been revised to reflect the possibly different requirements of the lower-enrichment, higher-volume fraction fuel. Because the reactor is now being canceled, this unrevised report is being issued for archival purposes. The report describes the fabrication and inspection development plan, the irradiation tests and performance modeling to qualify performance, the transient testing that is part of the safety program, and the interactions and interfaces of the fuel development with other tasks.

Copeland, G.L.

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Cable Measuring Engine Operation Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MEASURING ENGINE OPERATION PROCEDURES LBNL-40565 SC-MAG-597MEASURING ENGINE OPERATION PROCEDURES INDEX IN T ROD U C TCALIBRATION PROCEDURE . .

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

ARM - Publications Procedures  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

govPublicationsPublications Procedures Page Contents Types of ARM Publications Process for Publishing Planning Documents Science Reports Conference Documents Public Information...

235

TRANSPARENCY RECYCLING PROGRAM PROCEDURES  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

used overhead transparencies RECYCLE them for REUSE. It's Easy Follow these simple procedures: 1.) COLLECT used transparencies to be recycled. 2.) SEPARATE the transparencies...

236

PROCEDURES FOR ARC PROJECTS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PROCEDURES FOR ARC PROJECTS Revised - May 2013 Agricultural Research Center Washington State University #12;Table of Contents THE PROJECT SYSTEM, AN INTRODUCTION................................................................................. 5 DEVELOPING AN ARC PROJECT

Collins, Gary S.

237

Teaching Physician Guidelines for Surgical Procedures Minor Surgical Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Teaching Physician Guidelines for Surgical Procedures Minor Surgical Procedures: § Procedures, the teaching physician must be present for the entire procedure § Teaching physician or resident may document the teaching physician's presence for the entire procedure High Risk and Complex Surgical Procedures

Goldman, Steven A.

238

Sample results from the integrated salt disposition program macrobatch 6 tank 21H qualifications MST solids sample  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performed experiments on qualification material for use in the Integrated Salt Disposition Program (ISDP) Batch 6 processing. As part of this qualification work, SRNL performed an Actinide Removal Process (ARP) test. From this test, the residual monosodium titanate (MST) was analyzed for radionuclide uptake. The results of these analyses are reported and are within historical precedent.

Peters, T. B.

2013-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

239

U.S. Commits $14 million to U.S. - Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commits $14 million to U.S. - Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Commits $14 million to U.S. - Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Qualification Project U.S. Commits $14 million to U.S. - Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Qualification Project March 15, 2007 - 10:55am Addthis KYIV, Ukraine - U.S. Department of Energy Deputy Secretary Clay Sell today announced that the United States will invest $14 million to provide 42 nuclear fuel assemblies to the South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant under the U.S.-Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Qualification Project (UNFQP). In an agreement reached last week, Westinghouse Electric Company will manufacture nuclear fuel assemblies, which account for one-fourth of the fuel that powers a reactor for up to four years of operation. Deputy Secretary Sell is in Kyiv today to meet with top Ukrainian officials and U.S. business leaders to promote diversity of energy sources, greater energy efficiency,

240

"Order Module--DOE O 426.2, PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

"Order Module--DOE O 426.2, PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, "Order Module--DOE O 426.2, PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES "Order Module--DOE O 426.2, PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES "To establish selection, training, qualification, and certification requirements for contractor personnel who can impact the safety basis through their involvement in the operation, maintenance, and technical support of hazard category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities. The systematic approach to training as defined in the contractor requirements document (CRD) of DOE O 426.2 is designed to ensure that these personnel have the requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities to properly perform work in accordance

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Information Incident Response Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Information Incident Response Procedure Authority The Information Incident Response Procedure (IIRP) is authorized under the UWM Information Security Policy S59; section III-D (http://www4.uwm Information Security Office, and UWM Internal Audit. This document will be reviewed and updated annually

Saldin, Dilano

242

Text Redelegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Text Redelegation Procedures by Website Administrator Delegation Procedures Redelegation Procedures Redelegation Procedures for Functional Area Managers This page contains...

243

Procedures and Instructions | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Records Management Procedures and Instructions Procedures and Instructions Records Management Processes Procedure for Conducting a Records Inventory (PDF) Procedure for...

244

Redelegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirement...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Redelegation Procedures by Website Administrator Text version available here. Delegation Procedures Re-Delegation Procedures Document Actions Redelegation Procedures Redelegating...

245

VERIFICATION OF THE DEFENSE WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY'S (DWPF) PROCESS DIGESTION METHOD FOR THE SLUDGE BATCH 7A QUALIFICATION SAMPLE  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

For each sludge batch that is processed in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performs confirmation of the applicability of the digestion method to be used by the DWPF lab for elemental analysis of Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) receipt samples and SRAT product process control samples. DWPF SRAT samples are typically dissolved using a room temperature HF-HNO{sub 3} acid dissolution (i.e., DWPF Cold Chem Method, see DWPF Procedure SW4-15.201) and then analyzed by inductively coupled plasma - atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). This report contains the results and comparison of data generated from performing the Aqua Regia (AR), Sodium peroxide/Hydroxide Fusion (PF) and DWPF Cold Chem (CC) method digestions of Sludge Batch 7a (SB7a) SRAT Receipt and SB7a SRAT Product samples. The SB7a SRAT Receipt and SB7a SRAT Product samples were prepared in the SRNL Shielded Cells, and the SRAT Receipt material is representative of the sludge that constituates the SB7a Batch or qualification composition. This is the sludge in Tank 51 that is to be transferred into Tank 40, which will contain the heel of Sludge Batch 6 (SB6), to form the Sb7a Blend composition.

Click, D.; Edwards, T.; Jones, M.; Wiedenman, B.

2011-03-14T23:59:59.000Z

246

Trial-Run of a Junction-Box Attachment Test for Use in Photovoltaic Module Qualification: Preprint  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Engineering robust adhesion of the junction box (j-box) is a hurdle typically encountered by photovoltaic module manufacturers during product development and manufacturing process control. There are historical incidences of adverse effects (e.g., fires) caused when the j-box/adhesive/module system has failed in the field. The addition of a weight to the j-box during the 'damp-heat,' 'thermal-cycle,' or 'creep' tests within the IEC qualification protocol is proposed to verify the basic robustness of the adhesion system. The details of the proposed test are described, in addition to a trial-run of the test procedure. The described experiments examine four moisture-cured silicones, four foam tapes, and a hot-melt adhesive used in conjunction with glass, KPE, THV, and TPE substrates. For the purpose of validating the experiment, j-boxes were adhered to a substrate, loaded with a prescribed weight, and then subjected to aging. The replicate mock-modules were aged in an environmental chamber (at 85 degrees C/85% relative humidity for 1000 hours; then 100 degrees C/<10% relative humidity for 200 hours) or fielded in Golden (CO), Miami (FL), and Phoenix (AZ) for one year. Attachment strength tests, including pluck and shear test geometries, were also performed on smaller component specimens.

Miller, D. C.; Deibert, S. L.; Wohlgemuth, J. H.

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

Procedures in Modules (1) Including all procedures within modules  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Procedures in Modules (1) Including all procedures within modules works very well in almost all designing these if possible #12;Procedures in Modules (2) These are very much like internal procedures Works very well in almost all programs Everything accessible in the module can also be used in the procedure

248

NFRC Procedures for Laminates  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Laminates Laminates Last update: 12/10/2013 07:29 PM NFRC now has a procedure for making laminates in Optics5 and importing those laminate constructions into WINDOW5 to be used in a whole product calculation. The information presented below is provided to help simulators with this process. Feel free to contact us at WINDOWHelp@lbl.gov with questions or comments. NFRC Laminate Procedure Laminate Procedures (approved by NFRC) (PDF file) Approved Interlayer List (IGDB 33.0) (PDF file) NFRC Laminate Procedure Training Powerpoint with Examples (This Powerpoint presentation was used in the NFRC web based training sessions in December 2006 and January 2007) PowerPoint Presentation (PPT file) PowerPoint Presentation (PDF file) Help and Troubleshooting Error Messages The table below contains common warnings and error messages that may appear in Optics5 when calculating a laminate. Some of the messages can be ignored, and some are significant, which is indicated in the table.

249

Quiz Policies and Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Quiz Policies and Procedures. 1. Studying the lesson notes and completing most of the homework problems prior to class is the best way to prepare for a quiz. 2.

Bailey, Charlotte M

2014-08-19T23:59:59.000Z

250

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES (RIDS) Revision 1 November 1, 2007 Records Management Division, IM-23 PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES (RIDS) 1. If the records have not yet been inventoried, see "Procedure for Conducting a Records Inventory." An inventory must be completed prior to preparing the RIDS. 2. The Records Inventory and Disposition Schedules (RIDS) should be reviewed and updated at least annually on DOE F 1324.10 and DOE F 1324.9. The RIDS covers all record, administrative and programmatic, as well as non- record material. The RIDS must include: a. Complete and detailed information identifying the organization (s) responsible for the records.

251

Statistical simulation procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Ringer This thesis investicates methods for estimating statistical distribution functions which cannot be easily solved by theoretical techniques. The stratified Ilonte Carlo procedure of Ringer and Suharto [11j is extended to the multivariate case... and applied to two probIems, one practical, the other theoretical. This procedure Is shown to be more precise than simple Monte Carlo simula- t. i on. numerical method proposed by Soserville [12j is also extended to the multivariate case, and compared...

Tremelling, Robert Norman

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

252

June 23-27, 2008, Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Programs Accreditation Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Review Team Report U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 June 23 - 27, 2008 Sandia Site Office TQP Accreditation Review Team Report ii June 23 - 27, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 2 Conduct of the Evaluation..........................................................................................................................................2

253

June 23-27, 2008, NNSA-SC Technical Qualification Programs Accreditation Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Service Center Service Center Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Review Team Report U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 23-27, 2008 NNSA Service Center TQP Accreditation Review Team Report ii June 23 - 27, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 3 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 4 Conduct of the Evaluation..........................................................................................................................................4

254

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Los Alamos Field Office- FY14  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The FY14 self-assessment of the Technical Qualifications Program (TQP) and Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) was conducted to provide Los Alamos Field Office (NA-LA) management specific information related to effectiveness of the documentation and implementation of these programs.

255

Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes selection, training, qualification, and certification requirements for contractor personnel who can impact the safety basis through their involvement in the operation, maintenance, and technical support of Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 5480.20A. Admin Chg 1, dated 7-29-13.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

256

Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes selection, training, qualification, and certification requirements for contractor personnel who can impact the safety basis through their involvement in the operation, maintenance, and technical support of Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 5480.20A. Admin Chg 1, dated 7-29-13, cancels DOE O 426.2.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

257

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Carlsbad Field Office- 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Management Assessment (MA-12-08) was conducted from October 1-31, 2012. The management assessment team evaluated the specific requirement implementation, processes, and performance areas of the CBFO Technical Qualification Program (TQP). The assessment covered the relevant parts of DOE 0 426.1, Federal Technical Capability.

258

Model Request for Qualifications to Pre-Qualify Energy Service Companies  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This page contains model Request for Qualifications (RFQ) documents intended for use by a state program to pre-qualify Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) to be available for as-needed Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) services for state and local governments within the state.

259

LSPE Qualification and Flight Acceptance T /V Test Su.m..mary and Thermal Design  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

5. 2 5. 3 5.4 5.5 5. 6 5.7 Nodal Description Thermal Resistances Solar Heating Lunar SurfaceLSPE Qualification and Flight Acceptance T /V Test Su.m..mary and Thermal Design Final Report NO Thermal Control Systems. The report is divided into three sections. The first section introduces

Rathbun, Julie A.

260

August 23-27, 2010, Y-12 Site Office Technical Qualification Programs Accreditation Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DRAFT (7/12/10) DRAFT (7/12/10) Y-12 Site Office Technical Qualification Program Reaccreditation Review Team Report U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 23-27, 2010 Y-12 Site Office TQP Reaccreditation Review Team Report i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................. 5 Conduct of the Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 5

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

The DOE Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy has established the Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program to address the following overall goals: Provide a baseline fuel qualification data set in support of the licensing and operation of the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP). Gas-reactor fuel performance demonstration and qualification comprise the longest duration research and development (R&D) task for the NGNP feasibility. The baseline fuel form is to be demonstrated and qualified for a peak fuel centerline temperature of 1250C. Support near-term deployment of an NGNP by reducing market entry risks posed by technical uncertainties associated with fuel production and qualification. Utilize international collaboration mechanisms to extend the value of DOE resources. The Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program consists of five elements: fuel manufacture, fuel and materials irradiations, postirradiation examination (PIE) and safety testing, fuel performance modeling, and fission product transport and source term evaluation. An underlying theme for the fuel development work is the need to develop a more complete fundamental understanding of the relationship between the fuel fabrication process, key fuel properties, the irradiation performance of the fuel, and the release and transport of fission products in the NGNP primary coolant system. Fuel performance modeling and analysis of the fission product behavior in the primary circuit are important aspects of this work. The performance models are considered essential for several reasons, including guidance for the plant designer in establishing the core design and operating limits, and demonstration to the licensing authority that the applicant has a thorough understanding of the in-service behavior of the fuel system. The fission product behavior task will also provide primary source term data needed for licensing. An overview of the program and recent progress will be presented.

David Petti; Hans Gougar; Gary Bell

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Awardee Share Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Awardee Share Procedures Awardee Share Procedures Procedures for Correctly Reporting Awardee Share on the FAADS/FAADS Plus reporting screen in STRIPES To ensure proper reporting by DOE to USASpending.gov, you must enter the awardee share (also known as the cost share, recipient share, and non-federal share) manually on the FAADS/FAADS Plus reporting screen in STRIPES. The FAADS/FAADS Plus file is the financial assistance equivalent of the FPDS-NG data entry for acquisition awards. The awardee share amount is not system generated on the FAADS/FAADS Plus reporting screen like the obligation amount is. The fields on the FAADS/FAADS Plus form which must be entered when reporting a Cost-share Financial Assistance Award are: Field #17 Non-Federal Funding Sign Choose 'Obligation', which refers to a positive amount (sign), or 'Deobligation', which refers to a

263

Radiation Emergency Procedure Demonstrations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Managing Radiation Emergencies Managing Radiation Emergencies Procedure Demonstrations Procedure Demonstrations Note: RealPlayer is needed for listening to the narration that accompany these demonstrations. Real Player Dressing To Prevent the Spread of Radioactive Contamination This demonstration shows how your team can dress to prevent the spread of radioactive contamination. Click to begin presentation on dressing to prevent the spread of radioactive contamination. Preparing The Area This demonstration shows basic steps you can take to gather equipment and prepare a room to receive a patient who may be contaminated with radioactive material. Click to begin presentation on preparing a room to receive a radioactive contaminated patient. Removing Contaminated Clothing This demonstration shows the procedure for removing clothing from a patient who may be contaminated with radioactive material.

264

Evidence in European Asylum Procedures.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??This thesis explores the particular framework of evidentiary assessment of three selected appellate national asylum procedures in Europe and discusses the relationship between these procedures, (more)

Staffans, Ida

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Karen Nunez, Procedures Center Manager  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Karen Nunez, Procedures Center Manager Print Procedures Center Manager Karen Nunez has been working somewhat "behind the scenes" at the ALS for the past seven years, ensuring that...

266

Policy Procedure Administrative Directive Title: _____________________________________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Policy ­ Procedure ­ Administrative Directive Title: _____________________________________ Policy-President _____________ See also: Related Policies, Procedures and Agreements: Relevant Legislation and Regulations: ____________________________________________________________________________ Background and Purpose: ____________________________________________________________________________ Policy

Northern British Columbia, University of

267

Emergency Procedures | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Services Employee Services Safety and Health Emergency Procedures Emergency Procedures Note: This page is pending deletion, please refer to the Safety and health main page...

268

Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - August 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) Self-Assessment Report Senior Technical Safety Manager Qualification Program CONTENTS Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Assessment Criteria ................................................................................................................... 1 Finding ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Observation ............................................................................................................................... 2

269

Microsoft PowerPoint - S08-06_Peters_Result of Salt Batch Qualifications.ppt  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Salt Batch Qualification Testing Salt Batch Qualification Testing Tom Peters, Samuel Fink; E&CPT Research Programs, Savannah River National Laboratory Mark Geeting, Steven Brown, David Martin, Brent Gifford; Tank Farm Engineering, Savannah River Remediation November 17, 2010 SRNL-MS-2010-00250 Print Close 2 This presentation..... Results of Salt Batch Qualification Testing * Describes the Integrated Salt Disposition Project (ISDP), the newest operating facilities at the Savannah River Site for treating stored radioactive waste. * Reviews the past campaigns of salt disposition (Macrobatch 1 and 2). * Reviews current operations (Macrobatch 3) * Outlines the next qualification (Macrobatch 4) * Discusses the limiters in operations. Print Close 3 Introduction In 2001, the Department of Energy (DOE) identified Caustic-Side Solvent

270

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PROCEDURES HANDBOOK FOR CWRU EMPLOYEES August 2013 #12;CWRU EMERGENCY innovation, technology, teamwork, public- private co- operation and vigilance. Mission Statement We increase appropriately to any crisis or emergency. This handbook is comprehensive and provides employees with information

Cavusoglu, Cenk

271

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PROCEDURES HANDBOOK FOR CWRU STUDENTS August 2013 #12;CWRU EMERGENCY innovation, technology, teamwork, public- private co- operation and vigilance. Mission Statement We increase. This handbook is comprehensive and provides studetns with information on how to prepare for and respond

Cavusoglu, Cenk

272

BOMB THREAT CALL PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

THREAT CALL PROCEDURES BOMB THREAT CHECKLIST Date: Time: Time Caller Phone Number Where Hung Up: Call Received:Most bomb threats are received by phone. Bomb threats are serious until proven otherwise. Act threat is received by phone: 1. Remain calm. Keep the caller on the line for as long as possible. DO

Guo, Ting

273

BOMB THREAT CALL PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BOMB THREAT CALL PROCEDURES WHO TO CONTACT (select one) · Follow your local guidelines · Federal Protective Service (FPS) Police 1-877-4-FPS-411 (1-877-437-7411) · 911 Most bomb threats are received by phone. Bomb threats are serious until proven otherwise. Act quickly, but remain calm and obtain

Boyce, Richard L.

274

Building Programming List Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 6.090 Building Programming Experience Lecture 4 1/16/2007 Outline · List Procedures · Compound)) (define (reverse-helper l r) (if (null? l) r (reverse-helper (cdr l) (cons (car l) r)))) list-ref · Write

275

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES --2013 INFORMATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

quickly, remain calm. Take personal items (keys, purse, wallet, coat, shoes) Secure any hazardous procedures. SHOOTING INCIDENT If shooter is outside building: Turn off lights, lock windows and doors, close police. If shooter is inside the building: If safe to exit, flee. Call 9-1-1 to give location. Do

276

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES --2014 INFORMATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

hazardous materials. Close door when you exit. Go to evacuation assembly point designated by evacu- ation procedures. SHOOTING INCIDENT If shooter is outside building: Turn off lights, lock windows and doors, close of uniformed police. If shooter is inside the building: If safe to exit, flee. Call 9-1-1 to give location

277

DOE-HDBK-1001-96; Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-96 1-96 March 1996 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF INSTRUCTORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009490 DOE-HDBK-1001-96 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors is to provide contractor training

278

DOE-STD-1135-99 Guidance for Nuclear Criticality Safety Engineer Training and Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-99 5-99 September 1999 DOE STANDARD GUIDANCE FOR NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY ENGINEER TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1135-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Standard is required for use by all DOE Contractor criticality safety personnel. It contains guidelines that should be followed for NCS training and qualification

279

DOE-STD-1150-2002; Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1150-2002 April 2002 DOE STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Department-Wide Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard

280

Reliability Testing Beyond Qualification as a Key Component in Photovoltaic's Progress Toward Grid Parity: Preprint  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper discusses why it is necessary for new lower cost PV modules to be tested using a reliability test sequence that goes beyond the Qualification test sequence now utilized for modules. Today most PV modules are warranted for 25 years, but the Qualification Test Sequence does not test for 25-year life. There is no accepted test protocol to validate a 25-year lifetime. This paper recommends the use of long term accelerated testing to compare now designs directly with older designs that have achieved long lifetimes in outdoor exposure. If the new designs do as well or better than the older ones, then it is likely that they will survive an equivalent length of time in the field.

Wohlgemuth, J. H.; Kurtz, S.

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Procedures for Departing Employees | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Procedures for Departing Employees Procedures for Departing Employees RM Exit Procedures (2)3.12.12.pdf More Documents & Publications Procedures for Departing Employees Records...

282

Procedures for Departing Employees | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Procedures for Departing Employees Procedures for Departing Employees RM Exit Procedures.doc More Documents & Publications Procedures for Departing Employees Records Management...

283

July 12-15, 2010, Nevada Site Office Technical Qualification Programs Accreditation Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

(7/12/10) (7/12/10) National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Review Team Report U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 July 12-15, 2010 Nevada Site Office TQP Accreditation Review Team Report i July 12-15, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 4 Conduct of the Evaluation .......................................................................................................................................... 5

284

Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report, May 31, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report May 31, 2013 Assessment Team Richard crowe:NNSA NA-SH-80, Team Leader Dan Schwendenman, NNSA NA-SH-50 Carol lngn;:NNSA LFO Facility Operations Approved By: Phll ' F~nt .r/:;,/;.J ~I Date Date Date~/ NNSA Livermore Field Office TQP Self Assessment (NNSA LSO TQP SA) Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Methodology ...................................................................................................... 3

285

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Office of Science- 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Under DOE 426.1, Change 1. Headquarters and Field elements must conduct a self-assessment of Technical Qualification Program (TQP) and Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) implementation within their organization at least every four years. These assessments must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of DOE Order (0) 226.1 B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy, dated 4-25-11, and the current objectives and criteria approved by the FTCP Chair.

286

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Los Alamos Site Office- 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This self-assessment of the Technical Qualifications and Federal Technical Capability program was conducted to provide Los Alamos Field Office (LAFO) management specific information related to effectiveness of the documentation and implementation of these programs. The conclusion of this assessment is that the areas assessed herein are compliant with the requirements, and that implementation of the requirements has been effective at this Field Office.

287

Guide to good practices for training and qualification of instructors. DOE handbook  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Purpose of this guide is to provide contractor training organizations with information that can be used to verify the adquacy and/or modify existing instructor training programs, or to develop new training programs. It contains good practices for the training and qualification of technical instructors and instructional technologists at DOE reactor and non-reactor nuclear facilities. It addresses the content of initial and continuing instructor training programs, evaluation of instructor training programs, and maintenance of instructor training records.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

SRS SLUDGE BATCH QUALIFICATION AND PROCESSING; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND LESSONS LEARNED  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides a historical overview and lessons learned associated with the SRS sludge batch (SB) qualification and processing programs. The report covers the framework of the requirements for waste form acceptance, the DWPF Glass Product Control Program (GPCP), waste feed acceptance, examples of how the program complies with the specifications, an overview of the Startup Program, and a summary of continuous improvements and lessons learned. The report includes a bibliography of previous reports and briefings on the topic.

Cercy, M.; Peeler, D.; Stone, M.

2013-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

289

GLASS FABRICATION AND ANALYSIS LITERATURE REVIEW AND METHOD SELECTION FOR WTP WASTE FEED QUALIFICATION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Scope of the Report The objective of this literature review is to identify and review documents to address scaling, design, operations, and experimental setup, including configuration, data collection, and remote handling that would be used during waste feed qualification in support of the glass fabrication unit operation. Items addressed include: ? LAW and HLW glass formulation algorithms; ? Mixing and sampling; ? Rheological measurements; ? Heat of hydration; ? Glass fabrication techniques; ? Glass inspection; ? Composition analysis; ? Use of cooling curves; ? Hydrogen generation rate measurement.

Peeler, D.

2013-06-27T23:59:59.000Z

290

Guide to good practices for the selection, training, and qualification of shift supervisors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the Department of Energy (DOE) Guide to Good Practices for Selection, Training, and Qualification of Shift Supervisors is to provide DOE contractor organizations with information that can be used to modify existing programs or to develop new programs. DOE contractors should not feel obligated to adopt all parts of this guide. Rather, they can use the information in this guide to develop programs that apply to their facility.

Not Available

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

TRANSPARENCY RECYCLING PROGRAM PROCEDURES  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

TRANSPARENCY RECYCLING Don't throw out your used overhead transparencies! RECYCLE them for REUSE. It's Easy! Follow these simple procedures: 1.) COLLECT used transparencies to be recycled. 2.) SEPARATE the transparencies from ringed binders, plastic or paper folders, envelopes, and/or files. 3.) PLACE the transparencies (only) into an intra-laboratory mail envelope. 4.) SEND the envelope to: Terri Schneider, Building 201, 1D-10. Terri will prepare a

292

Rough Ride Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NTP005 NTP005 Revision 2 Effective December 1, 2004 Electric Vehicle Rough Road Course Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Ryan Harkins Approved by: _________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner ©2004 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved Procedure ETA-NTP005 Revision 2 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 4 5.0 Testing Activity Requirements 6 6.0 Glossary 12 7.0 References 14 Appendices Appendix A - Electric Vehicle Rough Road Test Data Sheet 15

293

Energy Metering Audit Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energy Meterilg Audtt Procedure Wiliam S Whitaker Engineering Specialist T X E INC. laPorte Texas INTROOUCI'ION This paper describes the recent audit of the utility distriooticn meters in a petrochanica1 plant. These meters measure the steam..., cx:ndensate, natural gas, water, nitrogen and air flCMS to the different process units within the plant. This audit started as an attellPt to resolve discrepan::ies between the 650 PSIG steam distriootion and supply meters. Theoretically the sum...

Whitaker, W. S.

294

Surface cleanliness measurement procedure  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A procedure and tools for quantifying surface cleanliness are described. Cleanliness of a target surface is quantified by wiping a prescribed area of the surface with a flexible, bright white cloth swatch, preferably mounted on a special tool. The cloth picks up a substantial amount of any particulate surface contamination. The amount of contamination is determined by measuring the reflectivity loss of the cloth before and after wiping on the contaminated system and comparing that loss to a previous calibration with similar contamination. In the alternative, a visual comparison of the contaminated cloth to a contamination key provides an indication of the surface cleanliness.

Schroder, Mark Stewart (Hendersonville, NC); Woodmansee, Donald Ernest (Simpsonville, SC); Beadie, Douglas Frank (Greenville, SC)

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

ON CONSISTENCY OF BAYES PROCEDURES  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

ON CONSISTENCY OF BAYES PROCEDURES Loraine Schwartz DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA...COLUMBIA. | Journal Article ON CONSISTENCY OF BAYES PROCEDURES BY LORAINE SCHWARTZ DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA...

Loraine Schwartz

1964-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Shrinking Procedures and Optimal Algorithms  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Jun 18, 2012 ... Optimal Stochastic Approximation Algorithms for Strongly Convex Stochastic Composite Optimization, II: Shrinking Procedures and Optimal...

Saeed Ghadimi

2012-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

297

Handbook of Academic Requirements & Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Handbook of Academic Requirements & Procedures for the Chemistry/Biotechnology Graduate Program. A detailed account of the academic requirements and procedures is provided for graduate students in chemistry; to promote consistency in procedures and standards; and to provide a basis for communication between

Kounaves, Samuel P.

298

Postgraduate Admissions Policy and Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Postgraduate Admissions Policy and Procedures SCOPE OF POLICY This policy applies to all to both staff and applicants on the University's procedures for admitting postgraduate students PROCEDURES 5 3.1 Making an application 5 3.2 Application deadlines 5 3.3 Accreditation of Prior Learning (APL

299

PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN University Policy PURPOSE 1.00 The following procedures define the method by which the appointment, or review and re-appointment, of the university librarian will be conducted. SCOPE 2.00 These procedures apply to: the appointment of a new

Victoria, University of

300

PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page | 1 PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENT OF ACADEMIC ASSOCIATE VICE Review: February, 2018 PURPOSE 1.00 The following procedures define the method by which the appointment.00 These procedures apply to the appointment and reappointment of academic Associate Vice-Presidents. An Academic

Victoria, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page | 1 PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENT OF DEANS University Policy No: GV0450 procedures define the method by which the appointment, or review and re-appointment, of deans will be conducted. SCOPE 2.00 These procedures apply to: the appointments of new deans, the review and re

Victoria, University of

302

Handbook of Academic Requirements & Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Handbook of Academic Requirements & Procedures for the Chemistry Graduate Program PLEASE NOTE and procedures is provided. The intent is to describe the programs and explain the rationale behind them of the Department; to promote consistency in procedures and standards; and to provide a basis for communication

Kounaves, Samuel P.

303

PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page 1 PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENT OF THE ASSOCIATE DEAN ACADEMIC ADVISING Last Editorial Change: Mandated Review: May, 2018 PURPOSE 1.00 The following procedures define (Faculties of Science, Social Sciences and Humanities) will be conducted. SCOPE 2.00 These procedures apply

Victoria, University of

304

Capital Projects Delivery Procedures Manual  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Capital Projects Delivery Procedures Manual September 4, 2008 Office of the CFO #12;2 Page I of the Capital Budget 11 B. Budget Approval 12 C. Setting Up Capital Projects 13 III. Procedures for Design ­ Office of the Chief Financial Officer Financial Policies and Procedures for the Capital Project Delivery

Alpay, S. Pamir

305

Records Management Exit Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Exit Procedures For Departing Federal and contractor Employees PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS The Federal Records Act requires the Department of Energy (DOE) Records Officer to remind departing Federal and contractor employees that Federal records may not be removed from Government custody nor may they be destroyed except in accordance with a records disposition schedule that has been approved by the Archivist of the United States. The creation of adequate documentation and the preservation of Federal records are required by law and regulation (contained in 36 CFR Chapter XII). As Federal and contractor employees, you have Federal record-keeping responsibilities that are regulated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to ensure the retention and

306

Functional issues and environmental qualification of digital protection systems of advanced light-water nuclear reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Issues of obsolescence and lack of infrastructural support in (analog) spare parts, coupled with the potential benefits of digital systems, are driving the nuclear industry to retrofit analog instrumentation and control (I&C) systems with digital and microprocessor-based systems. While these technologies have several advantages, their application to safety-related systems in nuclear power plants raises key issues relating to the systems` environmental qualification and functional reliability. To bound the problem of new I&C system functionality and qualification, the authors focused this study on protection systems proposed for use in ALWRs. Specifically, both functional and environmental qualification issues for ALWR protection system I&C were addressed by developing an environmental, functional, and aging data template for a protection division of each proposed ALWR design. By using information provided by manufacturers, environmental conditions and stressors to which I&C equipment in reactor protection divisions may be subjected were identified. The resulting data were then compared to a similar template for an instrument string typically found in an analog protection division of a present-day nuclear power plant. The authors also identified fiber-optic transmission systems as technologies that are relatively new to the nuclear power plant environment and examined the failure modes and age-related degradation mechanisms of fiber-optic components and systems. One reason for the exercise of caution in the introduction of software into safety-critical systems is the potential for common-cause failure due to the software. This study, however, approaches the functionality problem from a systems point of view. System malfunction scenarios are postulated to illustrate the fact that, when dealing with the performance of the overall integrated system, the real issues are functionality and fault tolerance, not hardware vs. software.

Korsah, K.; Clark, R.L.; Wood, R.T. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

DOE-STD-1176-2004; Chemical Processing Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

76-2004 76-2004 January 2004 DOE STANDARD CHEMICAL PROCESSING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1176-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA

308

General Technical Base Qualification Standard (DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1146-2007 December 2007 DOE STANDARD GENERAL TECHNICAL BASE QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1146-2007 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1146-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1146-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT................................................................................................................ vii PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................9

309

Tank 30 and 37 Supernatant Sample Cross-Check and Evaporator Feed Qualification Analysis-2012  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the analytical data reported by the F/H and Savannah River National Laboratories for the 2012 cross-check analysis for high level waste supernatant liquid samples from SRS Tanks 30 and 37. The intent of this Tank 30 and 37 sample analyses was to perform cross-checks against routine F/H Laboratory analyses (corrosion and evaporator feed qualification programs) using samples collected at the same time from both tanks as well as split samples from the tanks.

Oji, L. N.

2013-03-07T23:59:59.000Z

310

Instrument Qualification of Custom Fabricated Water Activity Meter for Hot Cell Use  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes a custom fabricated water activity meter and the results of the qualification of this meter as described in the laboratory test plan LAB-PLN-11-00012, Testing and Validation of an Enhanced Acquisition and Control System. It was calibrated against several NaOH solutions of varying concentrations to quantify the accuracy and precision of the instrument at 20 C and 60 C. Also, a schematic and parts list of the equipment used to make the water activity meter will be presented in this report.

McCoskey, Jacob K.

2014-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

311

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Los Alamos Site Office- 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Technical Capability Manual requires periodic self-assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of the Manual and the Technical Qualification Program utilizing a defined set of Objectives and Criteria. The assessment documented by this report is the first periodic review conducted at LASO to meet this requirement. The assessment results are intended to establish a base-line on which to develop and improve the program so no final grade was assigned; however, only six of the twelve Objectives were identified as being met.

312

Quality Assurance Program Plan for AGR Fuel Development and Qualification Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Quality Assurance Plan (QPP) is to document the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Management and Operating (M&O) Contractors quality assurance program for AGR Fuel Development and Qualification activities, which is under the control of the INEEL. The QPP is an integral part of the Gen IV Program Execution Plan (PEP) and establishes the set of management controls for those systems, structures and components (SSCs) and related quality affecting activities, necessary to provide adequate confidence that items will perform satisfactorily in service.

W. Ken Sowder

2004-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

DOE FTCP Supplemental Competencies - Human Factors Engineering Functional Area Qualification Competency Examples for DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FTCP FTCP SUPPLEMENTAL COMPETENCIES HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION COMPETENCY EXAMPLES For DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving qualification standards and competencies for Department-wide application. Approval of this set of competency statements by the Federal Technical Capability Panel is indicated by signature below. ?fuv-~ Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson ~·/Cf I Federal Technical Capability Panel * '2._ 3/19/12 I luman Factors Engineering compc1cncics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

314

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures The following procedures should be used to write, revise, or maintain a DOE...

315

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in...

316

Records Management Exit Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Exit Procedures Records Management Exit Procedures The purpose of this brochure is to provide records exit procedures for Federal and contractor employees who are departing on a...

317

Chapter 13 - Simplified Acquisition Procedures | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13 - Simplified Acquisition Procedures Chapter 13 - Simplified Acquisition Procedures 13.1 - Purchase Card Policy and Operating Procedures 13.2PurchaseOrders0.pdf More Documents...

318

Ordering Procedures for Contract Audit Services | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ordering Procedures for Contract Audit Services Ordering Procedures for Contract Audit Services Contract Audit Services Ordering Procedures for Contract Audit Services More...

319

Procedures for Students seeking accommodations.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This document outlines the procedures to be followed by students seeking accommodations in the following mathematics courses during Fall and Spring...

320

Examination of a Junction-Box Adhesion Test for Use in Photovoltaic Module Qualification: Preprint  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Engineering robust adhesion of the junction-box (j-box) is a hurdle typically encountered by photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturers during product development. There are historical incidences of adverse effects (e.g., fires) caused when the j-box/adhesive/module system has failed in the field. The addition of a weight to the j-box during the 'damp heat' IEC qualification test is proposed to verify the basic robustness of its adhesion system. The details of the proposed test will be described, in addition to the preliminary results obtained using representative materials and components. The described discovery experiments examine moisture-cured silicone, foam tape, and hot-melt adhesives used in conjunction with PET or glass module 'substrates.' To be able to interpret the results, a set of material-level characterizations was performed, including thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and dynamic mechanical analysis. PV j-boxes were adhered to a substrate, loaded with a prescribed weight, and then placed inside an environmental chamber (at 85C, 85% relative humidity). Some systems did not remain attached through the discovery experiments. Observed failure modes include delamination (at the j-box/adhesive or adhesive/substrate interface) and phase change/creep. The results are discussed in the context of the application requirements, in addition to the plan for the formal experiment supporting the proposed modification to the qualification test.

Miller, D. C.; Wohlgemuth, J. H.

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Qualification Requirements of Guided Ultrasonic Waves for Inspection of Piping in Light Water Reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Guided ultrasonic waves (GUW) are being increasingly used for both NDT and monitoring of piping. GUW offers advantages over many conventional NDE technologies due to the ability to inspect large volumes of piping components without significant removal of thermal insulation or protective layers. In addition, regions rendered inaccessible to more conventional NDE technologies may be more accessible using GUW techniques. For these reasons, utilities are increasingly considering the use of GUWs for performing the inspection of piping components in nuclear power plants. GUW is a rapidly evolving technology and its usage for inspection of nuclear power plant components requires refinement and qualification to ensure it is able to achieve consistent and acceptable levels of performance. This paper will discuss potential requirements for qualification of GUW techniques for the inspection of piping components in light water reactors (LWRs). The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has adopted ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code requirements in Sections V, III, and XI for nondestructive examination methods, fabrication inspections, and pre-service and in-service inspections. A Section V working group has been formed to place the methodology of GUW into the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code but no requirements for technique, equipment, or personnel exist in the Code at this time.

Meyer, Ryan M.; Ramuhalli, Pradeep; Doctor, Steven R.; Bond, Leonard J.

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Guide to good practices for the selection, training, and qualification of shift technical advisors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE Guide to Good Practices For the Selection, Training, and Qualification of Shift Technical Advisors can be used by any DOE nuclear facility that has implemented the shift technical advisor (STA) position. DOE Order 5480.20A, Personnel Selection, Qualification and Training Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, states that only Category A reactors must have a shift technical advisor. However, many DOE nuclear facilities have implemented the shift technical advisor position to provide independent on-shift technical advice and counsel to the shift operating personnel to help determine cause and mitigation of facility accidents. Those DOE nuclear facilities that have implemented or are going to implement the shift technical advisor position will find this guide useful. This guide addresses areas that may be covered by other training programs. In these cases, it is unnecessary (and undesirable) to duplicate these areas in the STA training program as long as the specific skills and knowledge essential for STAs are addressed. The guide is based on the premise that the trainee has not completed any facility-specific training other than general employee training.

NONE

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Purchasing Policy and Procedures Page 1 Purchasing Policy and Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Controller Responsible Offices: Purchasing Resource Services Controller's Office Origination Date: December 1Purchasing Policy and Procedures Page 1 4-1-2010 Purchasing Policy and Procedures Policy Statement are followed. Purchasing Resource Services (PRS), which is part of University Services, is the single point

Shahriar, Selim

324

Safeguards management inspection procedures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this inspection module is to independently assess the contributions of licensee management to overall safeguards systems performance. The inspector accomplishes this objective by comparing the licensee's safeguards management to both the 10 CFR, parts 70 and 73, requirements and to generally accepted management practices. The vehicle by which this comparison is to be made consists of assessment questions and key issues which point the inspector to areas of primary concern to the NRC and which raise additional issues for the purpose of exposing management ineffectiveness. Further insight into management effectiveness is obtained through those assessment questions specifically directed toward the licensee's safeguards system performance. If the quality of the safeguards is poor, then the inspector should strongly suspect that management's role is ineffective and should attempt to determine management's influence (or lack thereof) on the underlying safeguards deficiencies. (The converse is not necessarily true, however.) The assessment questions in essence provide an opportunity for the inspector to identify, to single out, and to probe further, questionable management practices. Specific issues, circumstances, and concerns which point to questionable or inappropriate practices should be explicitly identified and referenced against the CFR and the assessment questions. The inspection report should also explain why the inspector feels certain management practices are poor, counter to the CFR, and/or point to ineffecive management. Concurrent with documenting the inspection results, the inspector should provide recommendations for alleviating observed management practices that are detrimental to effective safeguards. The recommendations could include: specific changes in the practices of the licensee, followup procedures on the part of NRC, and proposed license changes.

Barth, M.J.; Dunn, D.R.

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

Procedure for Planning and Conducting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lift Plan Procedure Lift Plan Procedure Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Lead Author __________________________________ Date 07/13/2005___________ David A. Ernst Mechanical Service Group Approvals: __________________ Date _____________________ Matt Padilla SSRL Safety Officer __________________ Date _____________________ Robert Hettel Accelerator System Department Head __________________ Date _____________________ Piero Pianetta Beam Line System Department Head Hoist and Rigging Panel Member _______________________________________ Date ______________________

326

Fuel Station Procedure Applicability All  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Fuel Station Procedure Applicability All Last Revised 11/20/12 Procedure Owner Andrew Grant agrant for the purchasing and distribution of fuel for vehicles owned by Bowling Green State University (BGSU). This centralization is important to ensure compliance for BGSU employees who use the centralized fuel station and fuel

Moore, Paul A.

327

Test Procedure Conducted Energy Weapons  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Test Procedure for Conducted Energy Weapons Version 1.1 2010/07/31 #12;Contents Page 0.0 Disclaimer A TASER M26 13 Appendix B TASER X26 23 #12;1 Test Procedure for Conducted Energy Weapons 0.0 Disclaimer Energy Weapons ("CEWs") in a controlled and repeatable manner across jurisdictions. The consistent

Adler, Andy

328

LOCKOUT/TAGOUT Policy & Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

LOCKOUT/TAGOUT Policy & Procedure Office of Environmental Health and Safety 5425 Woodward, Suite This procedure establishes the Wayne State University requirements for the lockout of energy isolating devices that employee's duties include performing service or maintenance covered under this section. Lockout

Berdichevsky, Victor

329

Wellcome Trust SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE Wellcome Trust response to Department for Education: Reforming Key Stage 4 qualifications  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: Reforming Key Stage 4 qualifications December 2012 Department for Education: Reforming Key Stage 4 science skills. 2. We are pleased to have the opportunity to respond to the consultation on reforms to Key consultations on the reform to curriculum and assessment at various stages of schooling. There is an opportunity

Rambaut, Andrew

330

Qualification of the Nippon Instrumentation for use in Measuring Mercury at the Defense Waste Processing Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nippon Mercury/RA-3000 system installed in 221-S M-14 has been qualified for use. The qualification was a side-by-side comparison of the Nippon Mercury/RA-3000 system with the currently used Bacharach Mercury Analyzer. The side-by-side testing included standards for instrument calibration verifications, spiked samples and unspiked samples. The standards were traceable back to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The side-by-side work included the analysis of Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) Receipt, SRAT Product, and Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME) samples. With the qualification of the Nippon Mercury/RA-3000 system in M-14, the DWPF lab will be able to perform a head to head comparison of a second Nippon Mercury/RA-3000 system once the system is installed. The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) analyzes receipt and product samples from the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) to determine the mercury (Hg) concentration in the sludge slurry. The SRAT receipt is typically sampled and analyzed for the first ten SRAT batches of a new sludge batch to obtain an average Hg concentration. This average Hg concentration is then used to determine the amount of steam stripping required during the concentration/reflux step of the SRAT cycle to achieve a less than 0.6 wt% Hg in the SRAT product solids. After processing is complete, the SRAT product is sampled and analyzed for mercury to ensure that the mercury concentration does not exceed the 0.45 wt% limit in the Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME). The DWPF Laboratory utilizes Bacharach Analyzers to support these Hg analyses at this facility. These analyzers are more than 10 years old, and they are no longer supported by the manufacturer. Due to these difficulties, the Bacharach Analyzers are to be replaced by new Nippon Mercury/RA-3000 systems. DWPF issued a Technical Task Request (TTR) for the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to assist in the qualification of the new systems. SRNL prepared a task technical and quality assurance (TT&QA) plan that outlined the activities that are necessary and sufficient to meet the objectives of the TTR. In addition, TT&QA plan also included a test plan that provided guidance to the DWPF Lab in collecting the data needed to qualify the new Nippon Mercury/RA-3000 systems.

Edwards, T.; Mahannah, R.

2011-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

331

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 426.2 Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6.2 6.2 PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES DOE O 426.2 Familiar Level June 2011 1 DOE O 426.2 PERSONNEL SELECTION, TRAINING, QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FAMILIAR LEVEL ___________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE O 426.2, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities? 2. What are the DOE field elements requirements associated with DOE O 426.2? 3. What are the general contractor requirements specified in the contractor requirements

332

Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Test Procedure Test Procedure Waivers to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers on AddThis.com... About Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Current Rulemakings & Notices Test Procedure Waivers Recent Federal Register Notices How to Participate or Comment

333

DOE-STD-1180-2004; Construction Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1180-2004 March 2004 DOE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1180-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

334

DOE-STD-1151-2002; Facility Representative Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1151-2002 1151-2002 April 2002 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1151-2002 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior Department of Energy managers

335

DOE-STD-1159-2003; DOE Standard Waste Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

59-2003 59-2003 January 2003 DOE STANDARD WASTE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1159-2003 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior Department of Energy managers

336

DOE-STD-1174-2003; Radiation Protection Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-2003 4-2003 December 2003 DOE STANDARD RADIATION PROTECTION FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1174-2003 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy managers

337

DOE-STD-1160-2003; Occupational Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

03 03 March 2003 DOE STANDARD OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1160-2003 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy managers

338

DOE-STD-1175-2003; Senior Technical Safety Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT DOE-STD-1175-2003 December 2003 DOE STANDARD SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1175-2003 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 605-6000.

339

DOE-STD-1183-2004; Nuclear Safety Specialist Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1183-2004 April 2004 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR SAFETY SPECIALIST FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1183-2004 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1183-2004

340

DOE-STD-1161-2003; Mechanical Systems Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-2003 1-2003 June 2003 DOE STANDARD MECHANICAL SYSTEMS FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1161-2003 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior Department of Energy managers responsible

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE-STD-1172-2003; Safety Software Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

72-2003 72-2003 December 2003 DOE STANDARD SAFETY SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1172-2003 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1172-2003

342

FTCP FY09 Operational Plan GOAL 2 White Paper - Qualification Consistency and Transportability  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program FY 2009 Operational Plan Program FY 2009 Operational Plan Goal 2: Preserve and Enhance Technical Capability Objective 1 Point Paper NNSA/SSO/AMFO/8 Jul 09/adt Objective 1: Identify resource and organizational structure needs to improve qualification consistency and transportability. Actions: 1. Determine appropriate resource levels 2. Determine effective organizational structure Methodology A TQP Resource Management Questionnaire was developed to address the actions above. The scope of the questionnaire broadened to include questions concerning TQP-related definitions, mentorship, and centralization of TQP tasks directly under the FTCP. The questionnaire was sent to all FTCP Agents and associate members who were given approximately 45 days to respond. Summary of questionnaire results:

343

DOE-STD-1182-2004; Civil/Structural Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1182-2004 March 2004 DOE STANDARD CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1182-2004 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1182-2004

344

DOE-STD-1173-2003; Criticality Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

73-2003 73-2003 December 2003 DOE STANDARD CRITICALITY SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1173-2003 ii This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1173-2003

345

DOE-STD-1185-2004; Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STD-1185-2004 STD-1185-2004 August 2004 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE SAFETY STUDY FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1185-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1185-2004

346

DOE-STD-1177-2004; Emergency Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1177-2004 January 2004 DOE STANDARD EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1177-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

347

DOE-STD-1155-2002; Transportation and Traffic Management Functional Area Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1155-2002 September 2002 DOE STANDARD TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1155-2002 This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1155-2002 i APPROVAL

348

DOE-STD-1138-2000; Industrial Hygiene Funcational Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

38-2000 38-2000 July 2000 DOE STANDARD INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1138-2000 iii APPROVAL DOE-STD-1138-2000 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1138-2000 v TABLE OF CONTENTS

349

DOE-STD-1170-2003; Electrical Systems Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1170-2003 December 2003 DOE STANDARD ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1170-2003 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1170-2003

350

DOE-STD-1166-2003; Deactivation and Decommissioning Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1166-2003 September 2003 DOE STANDARD DEACTIVATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1166-2003 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

351

DOE-STD-1165-2003; Aviation Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-2003 5-2003 September 2003 DOE STANDARD AVIATION MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1165-2003 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

352

DOE-STD-1181-2004; Facility Maintenance Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1181-2004 March 2004 DOE STANDARD FACILITY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1181-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1181-2004 ii

353

DOE-STD-1156-2002; Environmental Compliance Function Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-2002 6-2002 October 2002 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1156-2002 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1156-2002

354

DOE-STD-1164-2003; Aviation Safety Officer Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-2003 4-2003 September 2003 DOE STANDARD AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA-TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1164-2003 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

355

DOE-STD-1178-2004; Technical Program Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

78-2004 78-2004 February 2004 DOE STANDARD TECHNICAL PROGRAM MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1178-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1178-2004

356

Results Of Initial Analyses Of The Macrobatch 7 Tank 21H Qualification Samples  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyzed samples from Tank 21H in support of qualification of Salt (Macro) Batch 7 for the Interim Salt Disposition Program (ISDP) through ARP/MCU. This document reports the initial results of the analyses of samples of Tank 21H. Further results on the chemistry and other tests will be issued in the future. No issues with the projected Salt Batch 7 strategy are identified, other than the presence of visible quantities of dark colored solids. Based upon a SRNL settling test, the solids should settle well within the months-long settling period to be employed in Tank 21H. However, SRNL recommends analyzing the solids to provide input to OLI modeling in order to evaluate the impacts of these solids to present and future salt batches.

Peters, T. B.; Washington, A. L. II

2013-07-08T23:59:59.000Z

357

FTCP Issues Paper - Use of "Expert Level" in Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy National Training Center PO Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400 July 2, 2012 Federal Technical Capability Panel's Issue Paper, Federal Technical Capability Pro gram -12-001, Use of"Expert Level" in Qualification Path Forward The Federal Technical Capability (FTC) Panel voted at the May 15, 2012, FTC Panel Face-to-Face Meeting, to delete all reference to expert-level knowledge requirements in F AQS and that the FTC Panel should direct modification ofthe F AQS template to reflect the decision, and request any needed page changes to current FAQS. After discussion with some FAQS sponsors, I have added the following wording to the Issue Paper as direction to our F AQS Sponsors: The FTCP Chair will request F AQS Sponsors and their supporting Recognized

358

DOE-STD-1162-2003; Instrumentation and Control Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-2003 2-2003 June 2003 DOE STANDARD INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1162-2003 iii

359

DOE-STD-1179-2004; Technical Training Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9-2004 9-2004 February 2004 DOE STANDARD TECHNICAL TRAINING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1179-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1179-2004 ii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy managers

360

NNSA NSO Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Self Assessment Report, October 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

IAl,W~\/Al IAl,W~\/Al llVl'~~t Nalional N uciea1 S ecurity Administration Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office P.O. Box 98518 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8518 FEB 0 . ~ 2010 Patricia R. Worthington, Director, Office of Health and Safety, DOE/HQ (HS-10) GTN NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEV ADA SITE OFFICE (NNSA/NSO) TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION PROGRAM (TQP) ACCREDITATION NNSA/NSO recently completed the attached TQP Self-Assessment. Based on the completion of this self assessment, I am formally requesting TQP Accreditation from your office. Barry L. Mellor, NNSA/NSO Training Manager, has been working with Ali H. Ghovanlou in preparation for this event. We would like to schedule the accreditation team for June, 2010.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Data Qualification Report: Compostion of J-13 Well Water for Use on the Yucca Mountain Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The data evaluated in this qualification report have been cited in analysis and model reports (AMRs) in support of the Site Recommendation in determining the suitability of the Yucca Mountain Site for a repository for high level nuclear waste. The AMRs use these hydrochemical data as a basis for modeling the chemical interactions between groundwater and engineered materials, including waste forms, packages and materials in the engineered barrier system J-13 water is also used as a reactant in experiments performed to collect data on corrosion of waste packages and repository materials, on solubility of radionuclides, on waste form leach rates, and in simulations of the mobility of radionuclides in groundwater, among other applications. J-13 water serves effectively as a reference or surrogate water composition across the program. Establishing a qualified data set describing the composition of J-13 will help ensure commonality among the various studies.

T.L. Steinborn

2000-07-21T23:59:59.000Z

362

DATA QUALIFICATION REPORT: WATER-LEVEL DATA FROM THE NYE COUNTY EARLY WARNING DRILLING PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this work is to evaluate unqualified, water-level data gathered under the Nye County Early Warning Drilling Program (EWDP) and to determine whether the status of the data should be changed to ''qualified'' data in accordance with AP-SIII.2Q (Qualification of Unqualified Data and the Documentation of Rationale for Accepted Data). The corroboration method (as defined in Attachment 2 of AP-SIII.2Q) was implemented to qualify water-level data from Nye County measurements obtained directly from the Nye County Nuclear Waste Repository Program Office (NWRPO). Comparison of United States Geological Survey (USGS) measurements contained in DTN GS990608312312.003 with the Nye County water-level data has shown that the differences in water-level altitudes for the same wells are significantly less than 1 meter. This is an acceptable finding. Evaluation and recommendation criteria have been strictly applied to qualify Nye County measurements of water levels in selected wells measured by the USGS. However, the process of qualifying measured results by corroboration also builds confidence that the Nye County method for measurement of water levels is adequate for the intended use of the data (which is regional modeling). Therefore, it is reasonable to extend the term of ''qualified'' to water-level measurements in the remaining Nye County Phase I wells on the basis that the method has been shown to produce adequate results for the intended purpose of supporting large-scale modeling activities for the Yucca Mountain Project (YMP). The Data Qualification Team recommends the Nye County, water-level data contained in Appendix D of this report be designated as ''qualified''. These data document manual measurements of water-levels in eight (8) EWDP Phase I drillholes that were obtained prior to the field installation of continuous monitoring equipment.

F. H. Dove, P. Sanchez, and L. Saraka

2000-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

363

NFRC Procedures for Applied Films  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Applied Films Applied Films Last update: 12/10/2013 07:29 PM NFRC now has a procedure for adding applied films to substrates in Optics5 and importing those applied film constructions into WINDOW5 to be used in a whole product calculation. The information presented below is provided to help simulators with this process. Feel free to contact us at WINDOWHelp@lbl.gov with questions or comments. NFRC Applied Film Procedure Applied Film Procedures (approved by NFRC) (PDF file) Approved Applied Film List (IGDB 33.0) (PDF file) NFRC Laminate Procedure Training Powerpoint with Examples (This Powerpoint presentation was used in the NFRC web based training sessions in December 2006 and January 2007) PowerPoint Presentation (PPT file) PowerPoint Presentation (PDF file) Help and Troubleshooting

364

May 15, 2012, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting … Presentation: The Importance of Technical Qualification and Continuous Learning  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Importance of Technical p Importance of Technical p Qualification & Continuous Learning NRC Commissioner William C. Ostendorff Federal Technical Capability Panel U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Las Vegas, Nevada May 15 2012 May 15, 2012 Agenda * Mission and Principles of the NRC * Position Qualification * Continuous Learning g Sea Story NRC Mission To license and regulate the nation's civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials in order to ensure the adequate and special nuclear materials in order to ensure the adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and to protect the environment. Principles of Good Regulation Independence p Openness Efficiency Clarity Reliability Position Qualification - NRR * Goal of Qualification Program -

365

Graduate School of Journalism Interim Grievance Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Graduate School of Journalism Interim Grievance Procedures Introduction The following procedures the Dean to conduct a hearing under the formal grievance procedures described in this statement. Those procedures, like the procedures of other schools, provide for a final appeal to the University Provost

Qian, Ning

366

Thermal treatment  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Thermal treatment can be regarded as either a pre-treatment of waste prior to final disposal, or as a means of valorising waste by recovering energy. It includes both the burning of mixed MSW in municipal inciner...

Dr. P. White; Dr. M. Franke; P. Hindle

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

TRAITEMENT DES EFFLUENTS WASTE TREATMENT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

residence time the production of biogas (7l-78 p. 100 CH,) was 237 1 per kg dry matter, i.e. 479 1 of CH to obtain the same amount of biogas four times quicklier. The treatment yield was improved (65 p. 100 COD). The mean production was 4931 biogas/kg degraded COD. It seems to be possible to apply that procedure

Boyer, Edmond

368

PROCEDURE Page 1 of 5 Procedure #: 3.1.24  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, administrative costs for collection, and (if still unpaid after 120 days) penalties. In addition, if invoices of materials, or manufacturing methods, processes, or treatments, including minor modifications thereof

Kemner, Ken

369

Federal Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures Note: Some Departments' agencies have their own NEPA implementing procedures. To access Department-wide NEPA implementing procedures, click on the name of the Federal Department. To access NEPA implementing procedures for Department's agencies, click on the provided links. Department/ Agency: Division: Link: Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi- in/text- idx?c=ecfr&SID=47c103e07fd64e933c7f74c 4b3c4ac9a&rgn=div5&view=text&node=7:6. 1 2 1 8&id 7 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- idx?c=ecfr&SID=47c103e07fd64e933c7f74c 4b3c4ac9a&rgn=div5&view=text&node=7:5. 1.1.1.21&idno=7 Farm Service Agency http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-

370

DOE-HDBK-1003-96; Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-96 3-96 March 1996 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009492 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel is to

371

OA-50 Office Specific Qualification Standard for ES&H Systems Assessor/Appraiser, October 2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT SAFETY AND HEALTH (ES&H) OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT SAFETY AND HEALTH (ES&H) EVALUATIONS ES&H SYSTEMS ASSESSOR/APPRAISER QUALIFICATION STANDARD FUNCTIONAL AREA Environment, Safety and Health Systems Assessor/Appraiser An environmental, safety and health system assessor/appraiser is that person who is normally at the GS 13 through 15 level, Excepted Service or Senior Level and assigned the responsibility to assess and evaluate management systems, environmental, safety and health programs and technical activities associated with DOE nuclear and non-nuclear facilities. PURPOSE The environmental, safety and health systems assessor/appraiser functional area qualification standard establishes common functional area competency requirements for all technical personnel in the Office of Environmental Safety and Health Evaluations. Satisfactory and

372

DOE-HDBK-1002-96; Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-96 2-96 March 1996 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF CHEMICAL OPERATORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009491 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators is to provide

373

Sample Results From The Interim Salt Disposition Program Macrobatch 7 Tank 21H Qualification MST Solids Sample  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performed experiments on qualification material for use in the Interim Salt Disposition Program (ISDP) Batch 7 processing. The Marcrobatch 7 material was received with visible fine particulate solids, atypical for these samples. The as received material was allowed to settle for a period greater than 24 hours. The supernatant was then decanted and utilized as our clarified feed material. As part of this qualification work, SRNL performed an Actinide Removal Process (ARP) test using the clarified feed material. From this test, the residual monosodium titanate (MST) was analyzed for radionuclide uptake after filtration from H-Tank Farm (HTF) feed salt solution. The results of these analyses are reported and are within historical precedent.

Washington, A. L. II; Peters, T. B.

2013-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

374

SAMPLE RESULTS FROM THE INTEGRATED SALT DISPOSITION PROGRAM MACROBATCH 5 TANK 21H QUALIFICATION MST, ESS AND PODD SAMPLES  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performed experiments on qualification material for use in the Integrated Salt Disposition Program (ISDP) Batch 5 processing. This qualification material was a composite created from recent samples from Tank 21H and archived samples from Tank 49H to match the projected blend from these two tanks. Additionally, samples of the composite were used in the Actinide Removal Process (ARP) and extraction-scrub-strip (ESS) tests. ARP and ESS test results met expectations. A sample from Tank 21H was also analyzed for the Performance Objectives Demonstration Document (PODD) requirements. SRNL was able to meet all of the requirements, including the desired detection limits for all the PODD analytes. This report details the results of the Actinide Removal Process (ARP), Extraction-Scrub-Strip (ESS) and Performance Objectives Demonstration Document (PODD) samples of Macrobatch (Salt Batch) 5 of the Integrated Salt Disposition Program (ISDP).

Peters, T.; Fink, S.

2012-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

375

UC Santa Barbara Policy and Procedure Implementing Procedures for the Whistleblower Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UC Santa Barbara Policy and Procedure Implementing Procedures for the Whistleblower Policy Contact: 8 Implementing Procedures for the Whistleblower Policy I. Purpose and Scope UC Santa Barbara's implementing procedure for the University of California Policy for Reporting and Investigating Allegations

Sideris, Thomas C.

376

DOE Technical Standards Program: Procedures  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Office of Nuclear Safety The following procedures should be used to write, revise, or maintain a DOE technical standard. They are also used to convert a DOE technical standard to a non-government standard or to form a topical committee. Table of Contents (TSPP-00) Program Overview and Responsibilities (TSPP-01) Initiating DOE Technical Standards (TSPP-02) Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and Interaction with Standards Development Organizations (TSPP-03) Developing DOE Technical Standard (TSPP-04) Coordination of Technical Standards (TSPP-05) - Draft In Concurrence Resolution - TSPP-06-2009 is the currently approved TSPP that addresses coordination of DOE Technical Standards. Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards (TSPP-06)

377

Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Standards and Test Standards and Test Procedures to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures on AddThis.com... About Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Further Guidance ENERGY STAR® Popular Links Success Stories Previous Next Lighten Energy Loads with System Design. Learn More.

378

Administrative Billing Procedures (pbl/contracts)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(Post-2006) Subscription Contracts IOUPublic Settlement Slice of the System Billing Procedures Firstgov Power Business Line (PBL) Administrative Billing Procedures This page has...

379

West Virginia University 1 Policies and Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

West Virginia University 1 Policies and Procedures In this Section: · Academic Integrity a Charge of Academic Dishonesty · Appeal Procedures for Cases Involving Academic Dishonesty Academic

Mohaghegh, Shahab

380

POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM #31 - Procedures for Regularizing...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 - Procedures for Regularizing Illegal Appointments POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM 31 - Procedures for Regularizing Illegal Appointments As part of the Department's ongoing effort to...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Postdoctoral Hiring Procedures | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hiring Procedures The Postdoctoral Office at DEP coordinates and facilitates the application, review, and hiring procedures for all postdoctoral candidates, following the...

382

Export Authorizations - Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Export Authorizations - Procedures Export Authorizations - Procedures Part II, Section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) states that exports of electric energy should be...

383

Presidential Permits - Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Permits - Procedures Presidential Permits - Procedures Executive Order 12038 states that, before a Presidential permit may be issued, the action must be found to be consistent with...

384

Standards and Test Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appliance & Equipment Standards Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures The Department of Energy (DOE) establishes energy efficiency standards for certain...

385

SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-24 NATIONAL HIGH MAGNETIC  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-24 NATIONAL HIGH MAGNETIC FIELD LABORATORY NHMFL FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-24 VISITOR AND CONTRACTOR SAFETY DIRECTOR, ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, SAFETY & SECURITY Angela Sutton

Weston, Ken

386

AGR-2 Data Qualification Report for ATR Cycles 147A, 148A, 148B, and 149A  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the data qualification status of fuel irradiation data from the first four reactor cycles (147A, 148A, 148B, and 149A) of the on-going second Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR-2) experiment as recorded in the NGNP Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS). This includes data received by NDMAS from the period June 22, 2010 through May 21, 2011. AGR-2 is the second in a series of eight planned irradiation experiments for the AGR Fuel Development and Qualification Program, which supports development of the very high temperature gas-cooled reactor (VHTR) under the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Project. Irradiation of the AGR-2 test train is being performed at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and is planned for 600 effective full power days (approximately 2.75 calendar years) (PLN-3798). The experiment is intended to demonstrate the performance of UCO (uranium oxycarbide) and UO2 (uranium dioxide) fuel produced in a large coater. Data qualification status of the AGR-1 experiment was reported in INL/EXT-10-17943 (Abbott et al. 2010).

Michael L. Abbott; Keith A. Daum

2011-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

EECBG Program Notice 10-014  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architecturalengineering professional services whereby competitors' qualifications are evaluated and...

388

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Battery Capacity and Depth of Discharge Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Garrett P. Beauregard Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-GTP003 Revision 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Objective ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Documentation............................................................................................................

389

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Traction System Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Garrett P. Beauregard Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-GTP002 Revision 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Objective ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Documentation............................................................................................................

390

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Electromagnetic Interference and Susceptibility Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Garrett P. Beauregard Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-GTP004 Revision 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Objective ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Documentation............................................................................................................

391

Cooperative Education Detailed Operational Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

credits of Cooperative education for one of the required elective courses in the ME programME 3990 Cooperative Education Detailed Operational Procedures Overview Cooperative education and Aeronautical Engineering faculty. Cooperative education is not a required component of the ME program

de Doncker, Elise

392

EMISSIONS TO AIR OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EMISSIONS TO AIR OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE Swansea University Estates Services Singleton Park Swansea to Air Department: Estates and Facilities Site: All Author: Ambreen Jahangir Approved by: Mark Durdin PURPOSE: To minimise emissions and discharges to air from boilers, fume cupboards, air conditioning

Harman, Neal.A.

393

Software Synthesis Procedures Viktor Kuncak  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Software Synthesis Procedures Viktor Kuncak LARA, I&C Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Institute of Technology (EPFL) Lausanne, Switzerland philippe.suter@epfl.ch ABSTRACT Automated synthesis. To integrate synthesis into programming languages, software synthesis algorithms should behave in a predictable

Kuncak, Viktor

394

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Procedures for Faculty Appeal Tribunals are used in these procedures: 1. `Appellant' means a faculty member who is entitled to appeal a tenure, within the Policy, Section IV, clauses 6(a) and 6(b). II Documents Governing Appeal Procedures

Hitchcock, Adam P.

395

Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review past procedures used to write, revise, or maintain a Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard.

396

PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (PID) POLICY AND PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

i PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (PID) POLICY AND PROCEDURES #12;PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY AND PROCEDURES 2 Contents 1. AUTHORISATION OF PROCEDURES 3 2. INTRODUCTION 3 2.1. Statement of commitment 3 2.2. Relationship to other Bureau policies 4 2.3. Application of procedures 4 3. RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBLIGATIONS 4

Greenslade, Diana

397

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Faculty General Grievance Procedure. OBJECTIVE This Procedure is designed to provide McMaster faculty members with prompt and impartial by existing, specific review procedures. It is intended to facilitate and promote informal resolution

Haykin, Simon

398

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Procedures for University Reviews copy held by the policy owner, the written copy prevails. #12;Procedures for University Reviews of Academic Departments April 28, 2005 1 Procedures for University Reviews of Academic Departments1 I

Haykin, Simon

399

Division of Human Resources University Grievance Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Division of Human Resources University Grievance Procedures Employee Relations/ USF System Grievance Procedure Questions: (813) 974-2970 Rev. 12/2012 This procedure applies to Administration, Staff in this procedure are expressed in calendar days. If a deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, an action

Meyers, Steven D.

400

CSP Policies & Procedures Process for Grade Appeals  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CSP Policies & Procedures Process for Grade Appeals Grade Appeals ­ Generally speaking, once grades

Leistikow, Bruce N.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

SAMPLE RESULTS FROM THE INTEGRATED SALT DISPOSITION PROGRAM MACROBATCH 4 TANK 21H QUALIFICATION SAMPLES  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyzed samples from Tank 21H to qualify them for use in the Integrated Salt Disposition Program (ISDP) Batch 4 processing. All sample results agree with expectations based on prior analyses where available. No issues with the projected Salt Batch 4 strategy are identified. This revision includes additional data points that were not available in the original issue of the document, such as additional plutonium results, the results of the monosodium titanate (MST) sorption test and the extraction, scrub strip (ESS) test. This report covers the revision to the Tank 21H qualification sample results for Macrobatch (Salt Batch) 4 of the Integrated Salt Disposition Program (ISDP). A previous document covers initial characterization which includes results for a number of non-radiological analytes. These results were used to perform aluminum solubility modeling to determine the hydroxide needs for Salt Batch 4 to prevent the precipitation of solids. Sodium hydroxide was then added to Tank 21 and additional samples were pulled for the analyses discussed in this report. This work was specified by Task Technical Request and by Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP).

Peters, T.; Fink, S.

2011-06-22T23:59:59.000Z

402

Qualification High Voltage Testing of Short Triax HTS Cables in the Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In order to qualify the electrical insulation design of future HTS cables installed in the electric grid, a number of high voltage qualification tests are generally performed in the laboratory on either single-phase model cables and/or actual three-phase cable samples. Prior to installation of the 200-m Triax HTS cable at the American Electric Power Bixby substation near Columbus, Ohio, in September, 2006, such tests were conducted on both single-phase model cables made at ORNL and tri-axial cable sections cut off from cable made on a production run. The three-phase tri-axial design provides some specific testing challenges since the ground shield and three phases are concentric about a central former with each phase separated by dielectric tape insulation immersed in liquid nitrogen. The samples were successfully tested and qualified for partial discharge inception, AC withstand, and lightning impulse where voltage is applied to one phase with the other phases grounded. In addition one of the phase pairs was tested for dc withstand as a ldquoworst caserdquo scenario to simulate the effect of VLF (Very Low Frequency) tests on the actual cable installed at the Bixby site. The model and prototype cables will be described and the high voltage test results summarized.

James, David Randy [ORNL; Sauers, Isidor [ORNL; Ellis, Alvin R [ORNL; Tuncer, Enis [ORNL; Gouge, Michael J [ORNL; Demko, Jonathan A [ORNL; Duckworth, Robert C [ORNL; Rey, Christopher M [ORNL

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Proposal for Qualification of Gas-Generating Radioactive Payloads for Transportation within a Type B Package  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Characterization data describing radioactive materials (RAM) in storage are likely those associated with the processes that produced the materials or with the mission for which they were produced. Along with impurity data, often absent or unknown as a result of post-processing storage environment is moisture content. Radiolysis of moisture may lead to a hydrogen flammability hazard within a closed volume such as a storage can or a transportation package. This paper offers a practical means of qualifying payloads of unknown moisture content for shipment within Type B packaging, while supporting the DOE program to maintain radworker dose as low as reasonable achievable (ALARA). Specifically, the paper discusses part of a qualification program carried out at the Savannah River Site for onsite shipment of legacy RAM within the DDF-1 package. The DDF-1 is an onsite-only prototype of the currently certified 9975 package. Measurement of storage-can lid bulge can provide an upper bound for pressure within a storage can. Subsequent belljar testing can measure the rate of gas leakage from a storage can. These actions are shown sufficient to ensure that the performance of the 9975 containment vessels can accommodate the deflagration energy from flammable gas mixtures within Normal Conditions of Transport, and, and the consequences of a detonation shock wave within Hypothetical Accident Conditions.

Houghtaling, T.K.

2002-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

404

Qualification of Programmable Electronic System (PES) equipment based on international nuclear I and C standards  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Nuclear power plants (NPPs) are increasingly faced with the challenge of qualifying procured equipment, sub-components, and systems that contain digital programmed electronics for use in safety-related applications. Referred to as a 'programmable electronic system' (PES), such equipment typically contains both complex logic that is vulnerable to systematic design faults, and low voltage electronics hardware that is subject to random faults. Procured PES products or components are often only commercial grade, yet can offer reliable cost effective alternatives to custom-designed or nuclear qualified equipment, provided they can be shown to meet the quality assurance, functional safety, environmental, and reliability requirements of a particular application. The process of confirming this is referred to as application-specific product qualification (ASPQ) and can be challenging and costly. This paper provides an overview of an approach that has been developed at Atomic Energy Canada Limited (AECL) and successfully applied to PES equipment intended for use in domestic Candu R 6 nuclear power plants and special purpose reactors at Chalk River Laboratories. The approach has evolved over the past decade and has recently been adapted to be consistent with, and take advantage of new standards that are applicable to nuclear safety-related I and C systems. Also discussed are how recognized third-party safety-certifications of PES equipment to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards, and the assessment methods employed, may be used to reduce ASPQ effort. (authors)

De Grosbois, J.; Hepburn, G. A.; Olmstead, R. [Atomic Energy Canada Ltd., 2251 Speakman Drive, Mississauga, Ont. L5K 1B2 (Canada); Goble, W. [Exida, 64 N. Main St., Sellersville, PA 18960 (United States); Kumar, V. [Carleton Univ., 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ont. K1S 5B6 (Canada)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Ris-R-1263(EN) Procedures for Determination of  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Plutonium procedure for seaweed 9 Plutonium procedure for 1-2 g sediment or soil 10 Americium procedure

406

Systems and procedures for integrated recovery of forest biomass  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Whether recovery of forest biomass will become a common procedure depends on how acceptable biomass is for fuel and fiber, what the demand is for it, how stable is its supply, and how economic it is when it comes to energy. Manufacturers appear interested in continuing to develop machines and systems that recover biomass resulting from silvicultural treatments, final harvests, and site preparation. (Refs. 9).

Walbridge, T.A.; Stuart, W.B.

1983-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Developer Installed Treatment Plants  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-installed treatment plants. These treatment plants are more commonly known as package wastewater treatment plants. 1

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Revision 2 Effective October 1, 2007 Braking Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date: _________ Roberta Brayer Approved by: _________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald Karner Procedure ETA-HTP06 Revision 2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Objectives 1 2. Purpose 1 3. Documentation 1 4. Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 1 5. Testing Activity Requirements 3 5.3 Dry Controlled Test 4 6. Glossary 5 7. References 7 Appendices Appendix A - Handling Pad Test Data Sheet 8

409

CBFWA Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP)CBFWA Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) (2006(2006--006006--00)00)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CBFWA Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP)CBFWA Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP 101HEP 101 Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) developed byHabitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP

410

Sample Results From The Interim Salt Disposition Program Macrobatch 7 Tank 21H Qualification Samples  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyzed samples from Tank 21H in support of qualification of Macrobatch (Salt Batch) 7 for the Interim Salt Disposition Program (ISDP). An ARP and several ESS tests were also performed. This document reports characterization data on the samples of Tank 21H as well as simulated performance of ARP/MCU. No issues with the projected Salt Batch 7 strategy are identified, other than the presence of visible quantities of dark colored solids. A demonstration of the monosodium titanate (0.2 g/L) removal of strontium and actinides provided acceptable 4 hour average decontamination factors for Pu and Sr of 3.22 and 18.4, respectively. The Four ESS tests also showed acceptable behavior with distribution ratios (D(Cs)) values of 15.96, 57.1, 58.6, and 65.6 for the MCU, cold blend, hot blend, and Next Generation Solvent (NGS), respectively. The predicted value for the MCU solvent was 13.2. Currently, there are no models that would allow a prediction of extraction behavior for the other three solvents. SRNL recommends that a model for predicting extraction behavior for cesium removal for the blended solvent and NGS be developed. While no outstanding issues were noted, the presence of solids in the samples should be investigated in future work. It is possible that the solids may represent a potential reservoir of material (such as potassium) that could have an impact on MCU performance if they were to dissolve back into the feed solution. This salt batch is intended to be the first batch to be processed through MCU entirely using the new NGS-MCU solvent.

Peters, T. B.; Washington, A. L. II

2013-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

411

Data Qualification Report: Precipitation Chloride Data for Use on the Yucca Mountain Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The data covered by this qualification report have been cited in analysis/model reports (AMRs) to support the Site Recommendation in determining the suitability of Yucca Mountain as a repository for high level nuclear waste. Those analyses cited both qualified and unqualified hydrochemical data. This report evaluates unqualified precipitation chloride data based on the pedigree of the data and within the context of supporting analyses on the Yucca Mountain Project (YMP). The following AMRs use the unqualified chloride data considered in this report: (1) AMR S0040, ''Geochemical and Isotopic Constraints on Groundwater Flow Directions, Mixing and Recharge at Yucca Mountain'' (ANL-NBS-HS-000021) (Kwicklis 2000)--an analysis of groundwater recharge rates, flow directions and velocities, and mixing proportions of water from different source areas based on groundwater geochemical and isotopic data. (2) AMR U0085, ''Analysis of Geochemical Data for the Unsaturated Zone'' (ANL-NBS-HS-000017) (Fabryka-Martin 2000)--identifies fluid geochemical parameters for the unsaturated zone, local precipitation, and surface water; discusses the occurrence and origins of fracture minerals; and presents a thermal history of the unsaturated zone. These data are being evaluated for inclusion in technical products to include AMRs and Process Modeling Reports (PMRs) that support the Site Recommendation and that may also be used to support the License Application. A finding that the precipitation chloride data are qualified means that the data are adequate for generalized use and can be appropriately used in a wide variety of applications, so long as consideration is given to limitations on the accuracy, precision and representativeness of the data for an intended use in a technical product.

C. Wilson

2000-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

412

Procedures for Preparing the Research Project Proposal (Revised: March 5, 2010) 1 PROCEDURES FOR A PROJECT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Procedures for Preparing the Research Project Proposal (Revised: March 5, 2010) 1 PROCEDURES FOR A PROJECT: for the Master of Science in Human-Computer Interaction, IN 46202 Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis (IUPUI) #12;Procedures for Preparing

Zhou, Yaoqi

413

AGR-2 Final Data Qualification Report for U.S. Capsules - ATR Cycles 147A Through 154B  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides the data qualification status of AGR-2 fuel irradiation experimental data in four U.S. capsules from all 15 Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Cycles 147A, 148A, 148B, 149A, 149B, 150A, 150B, 151A, 151B, 152A, 152B, 153A, 153B, 154A, and 154B, as recorded in the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS). Thus, this report covers data qualification status for the entire AGR-2 irradiation and will replace four previously issued AGR-2 data qualification reports (e.g., INL/EXT-11-22798, INL/EXT-12-26184, INL/EXT-13-29701, and INL/EXT-13-30750). During AGR-2 irradiation, two cycles, 152A and 153A, occurred when the ATR core was briefly at low power, so AGR-2 irradiation data are not used for physics and thermal calculations. Also, two cycles, 150A and 153B, are Power Axial Locator Mechanism (PALM) cycles when the ATR power is higher than during normal cycles. During the first PALM cycle, 150A, the experiment was temporarily moved from the B-12 location to the ATR water canal and during the second PALM cycle, 153B, the experiment was temporarily moved from the B-12 location to the I-24 location to avoid being overheated. During the Outage cycle, 153A, seven flow meters were installed downstream from seven Fission Product Monitoring System (FPMS) monitors to measure flows from the monitors and these data are included in the NDMAS database. The AGR-2 data streams addressed in this report include thermocouple (TC) temperatures, sweep gas data (flow rates including new FPM downstream flows, pressure, and moisture content), and FPMS data (release rates and release-to-birth rate ratios [R/Bs]) for each of the four U.S. capsules in the AGR-2 experiment (Capsules 2, 3, 5, and 6). The final data qualification status for these data streams is determined by a Data Review Committee comprised of AGR technical leads, Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Program Quality Assurance (QA), and NDMAS analysts. The Data Review Committee, which convened just before each data qualification report was issued, reviewed the data acquisition process, considered whether the data met the requirements for data collection as specified in QA-approved VHTR data collection plans, examined the results of NDMAS data testing and statistical analyses, and confirmed the qualification status of the data as given in each report. This report performs the following tasks: (1) combine existing qualification status of all AGR-2 data, (2) provide FPMS data qualification update and new release-to-birth ratio (R/B) data calculated using daily calculated birthrates, and (3) revise data qualification status of TC readings for some TCs in Capsule 6 based on their differences relative to calculated temperatures at TC locations. A total of 17,001,695 TC temperature and sweep gas data records were received and processed by NDMAS for four U.S. capsules during AGR-2 irradiation. Of these records, 9,655,474 (56.8% of the total) were determined to be Qualified; 5,792,052 (34.1% of the total) were determined to be Failed; and 1,554,169 (9.1% of the total) were determined to be Trend. For the first nice cycles, from ATR Cycle 147A to 151B, data records are 5- minute or 10-minute averaged values provided on weekly basis in EXCEL spreadsheets. For the last six cycles, ATR Cycle 152A through 154B, data records are instantaneous measurements recorded every minute and provided by .csv text files automatically every 2 hours. Therefore, the number of processed irradiation data was increased substantially from ATR Cycle 152A. For TC temperature data, there were 6,857,675 records and of these data 5,288,249 records (77.1% of the total TC data) were Failed due to TC instrument failures and 418,569 records (6.1% of the total TC data) were Trend due to large differences between TC readings and calculated values. By the end of Cycle 154A, all TCs in the AGR-2 test train failed. The overall percentage of Failed TC records is high, to some extent, because TCs failed toward the end of irradiation when the recording frequency was higher. For sweep gas data, there were 10,1

Pham, Binh T; Einerson, Jeffrey J

2014-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

SLUDGE BATCH 7 ACCEPTANCE EVALUATION: RADIONUCLIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN TANK 51 SB7 QUALIFICATION SAMPLE PREPARED AT SRNL  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Presented in this report are radionuclide concentrations required as part of the program of qualifying Sludge Batch Seven (SB7) for processing in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). The SB7 material is currently in Tank 51 being washed and prepared for transfer to Tank 40. The acceptance evaluation needs to be completed prior to the transfer of the material in Tank 51 to Tank 40. The sludge slurry in Tank 40 has already been qualified for DWPF and is currently being processed as SB6. The radionuclide concentrations were measured or estimated in the Tank 51 SB7 Qualification Sample prepared at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). This sample was prepared from the three liter qualification sample of Tank 51 sludge slurry (HTF-51-10-125) received on September 18, 2010. The sample was delivered to SRNL where it was initially characterized in the Shielded Cells. With consultation from the Liquid Waste Organization, the qualification sample was then modified by several washes and decants, which included addition of Pu from H Canyon and sodium nitrite per the Tank Farm corrosion control program. This final slurry now has a composition expected to be similar to that of the slurry in Tank 51 after final preparations have been made for transfer of that slurry to Tank 40. Determining the radionuclide concentrations in this Tank 51 SB7 Qualification Sample is part of the work requested in Technical Task Request (TTR) No. HLW-DWPF-TTR-2010-0031. The radionuclides included in this report are needed for the DWPF Radiological Program Evaluation, the DWPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (TSR/WAC) Evaluation, and the DWPF Solid Waste Characterization Program (TTR Task I.2). Radionuclides required to meet the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (TTR Task III.2.) will be measured at a later date after the slurry from Tank 51 has been transferred to Tank 40. Then a sample of the as-processed SB7 will be taken and transferred to SRNL for measurement of these radionuclides. The results presented in this report are those necessary for DWPF to assess if the Tank 51 SB7 sample prepared at SRNL meets the requirements for the DWPF Radiological Program Evaluation, the DWPF Waste Acceptance Criteria evaluation, and the DWPF Solid Waste Characterization Program. Concentrations are given for thirty-four radionuclides along with total alpha and beta activity. Values for total gamma and total gamma plus beta activities are also calculated.

Pareizs, J.; Hay, M.

2011-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

415

UC Santa Barbara Academic Review Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-Assessment .............................................. 5 D. Departmental Development Plan ........................................... 9 V. External Review plan; procedures for the selection of the External Review Committee (ERC); and guidelines for the ERCUC Santa Barbara Academic Review Procedures TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Purpose

Cappello, Peter

416

POLICY: A:VPFA # / Purchasing Policy PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

POLICY: A:VPFA # / Purchasing Policy PROCEDURES: APPENDIX: Approved: April 1, 2013 Revised: Cross References: Purchasing Policy Capital Projects and Renovations Policy Conflict of Interest Policy Sustainability Policy Green Procurement Policy 1 of 9 PROCEDURES: Purchasing Policy AUTHORITY: University

Martin, Jeff

417

Current Test Procedure Waivers | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Current Test Procedure Waivers Current Test Procedure Waivers The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations for covered products permit a person to seek a waiver, or an interim...

418

Automated Operating Procedures for Transfer Limits  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Automated Operating Procedures for Transfer Limits Final Project Report Power Systems Engineering · Illinois · Iowa State · Texas A&M · Washington State · Wisconsin Automated Operating Procedures

419

ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Chapter 23 LEGAL PROCEDURES Approved by President: 9/3/03 23-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 23.01 OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................2 23.01.1 CURRENT POLICY

Rusu, Adrian

420

Delegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy's primary means of establishing policies, requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. Directives Program Management Camille...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

PROCEDURES and INSTRUCTIONS for SUBMITTING FINAL ...  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Apr 16, 2010 ... PROCEDURES and INSTRUCTIONS for SUBMITTING FINAL GRADES. Please view rather than print this information. A version without...

saerens

2010-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

422

Faculty Code Chapter 28 Adjudication Filing Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Faculty Code Chapter 28 Adjudication Filing Procedures Secretary of the Faculty 10/2014 #12;Page 1 |Adjudication Introduction| Chapter 28 of the Faculty Code sets forth the adjudicative procedures to be used resolution procedures are available at any time during the resolution process, including the time period

Van Volkenburgh, Elizabeth

423

Dartmouth College Employment Policies and Procedures Manual  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Dartmouth College Employment Policies and Procedures Manual Policy last updated: April 25, 2008 Grievance Procedure, Equal Opportunity Applies to: All employees Policy Statement: Dartmouth College of the Equal Opportunity Policy may bring a complaint under the Equal Opportunity Grievance Procedure. In some

Myers, Lawrence C.

424

PROCEDURES FOR THE SEARCH, APPOINTMENT, OR REAPPOINTMENT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 PROCEDURES FOR THE SEARCH, APPOINTMENT, OR REAPPOINTMENT OF THE PRESIDENT AND VICE- CHANCELLOR of Senate establish procedures for the recommendation and selection of the President and shall subsequently appoint the President. The following procedures determine the method by which the Board of Governors

Victoria, University of

425

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RULES AND PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE STUDENT SENATE ____________________________________________________________ Issued by the Office of the Student Senate Special Committee on Rules and Procedures October 2008 Amended through February, 2014 #12;#12;RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE STUDENT SENATE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Roy, Subrata

426

Competency Patient Care Sub Domain Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Competency Patient Care Sub Domain Procedures Learning Objective Understands informed consent and performs uncomplicated procedures on patients or in simulation Milestones Year I Year II Year III Year IV Mid End Mid End Mid End Mid End · Defines elements of informed consent for procedures · Explains

Leistikow, Bruce N.

427

Procedures and Standards for Residential Ventilation System  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Procedures and Standards for Residential Ventilation System Commissioning: An Annotated, commissioning, procedures, standards, ASHRAE 62.2 Please use the following citation for this report: Stratton, J.C. and C.P. Wray. 2013. Procedures and Standards for Residential Ventilation System Commissioning

428

UCSD Implementing Procedures 36/Classification of Positions  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UCSD Implementing Procedures (HR-S-1) 36/Classification of Positions I. REFERENCES AND RELATED POLICIES A. UCSD Implementing Procedures 20 ­ Recruitment B. UC PPSM 36 - Classification of Positions C shall be obtained prior to any commitment to the concerned individual. III. PROCEDURES A. New

Tsien, Roger Y.

429

Standards and Procedures for Promotion and Tenure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix C Standards and Procedures for Promotion and Tenure I. Preamble This document sets forth standards and procedures for faculty promotions and appointments to tenure. These standards and procedures by university needs, plans, and resources. II. Standards The criteria outlined below are, of necessity

Heller, Barbara

430

E-Print Network 3.0 - arteriovenous fistulae treatment Sample...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

OF PROCEDURES INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES Summary: Excludes: low-dose infusion interleukin-2 (99.28) 00.16 Pressurized treatment of venous bypass graft... conduit...

431

Interim salt disposition program macrobatch 6 tank 21H qualification monosodium titanate and cesium mass transfer tests  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performed experiments on qualification material for use in the Interim Salt Disposition Program (ISDP) Batch 6 processing. This qualification material was a set of six samples from Tank 21H in October 2012. This sample was used as a real waste demonstration of the Actinide Removal Process (ARP) and the Extraction-Scrub-Strip (ESS) tests process. The Tank 21H sample was contacted with a reduced amount (0.2 g/L) of MST and characterized for strontium and actinide removal at 0 and 8 hour time intervals in this salt batch. {sup 237}Np and {sup 243}Am were both observed to be below detection limits in the source material, and so these results are not reported in this report. The plutonium and uranium samples had decontamination factor (DF) values that were on par or slightly better than we expected from Batch 5. The strontium DF values are slightly lower than expected but still in an acceptable range. The Extraction, Scrub, and Strip (ESS) testing demonstrated cesium removal, stripping and scrubbing within the acceptable range. Overall, the testing indicated that cesium removal is comparable to prior batches at MCU.

Washington, A. L. II; Peters, T. B.; Fink, S. D.

2013-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

432

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Los Alamos Site Office- 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The overall approach of the TQP self-assessment was to evaluate the personnel, procedures, and management control systems that demonstrate an effective program for ensuring the technical capability of LASO employees whose responsibilities require them to provide assistance, guidance, direction, oversight, or evaluation of contractor activities that could impact the safe operation of a defense nuclear facility.

433

Writer`s guide for technical procedures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A primary objective of operations conducted in the US Department of Energy (DOE) complex is safety. Procedures are a critical element of maintaining a safety envelope to ensure safe facility operation. This DOE Writer`s Guide for Technical Procedures addresses the content, format, and style of technical procedures that prescribe production, operation of equipment and facilities, and maintenance activities. The DOE Writer`s Guide for Management Control Procedures and DOE Writer`s Guide for Emergency and Alarm Response Procedures are being developed to assist writers in developing nontechnical procedures. DOE is providing this guide to assist writers across the DOE complex in producing accurate, complete, and usable procedures that promote safe and efficient operations that comply with DOE orders, including DOE Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations for DOE Facilities, and 5480.6, Safety of Department of Energy-Owned Nuclear Reactors.

NONE

1998-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS FOR COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURES  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper provides a characterization of human reliability analysis (HRA) issues for computerized procedures in nuclear power plant control rooms. It is beyond the scope of this paper to propose a new HRA approach or to recommend specific methods or refinements to those methods. Rather, this paper provides a review of HRA as applied to traditional paper-based procedures, followed by a discussion of what specific factors should additionally be considered in HRAs for computerized procedures. Performance shaping factors and failure modes unique to computerized procedures are highlighted. Since there is no definitive guide to HRA for paper-based procedures, this paper also serves to clarify the existing guidance on paper-based procedures before delving into the unique aspects of computerized procedures.

Ronald L. Boring; David I. Gertman; Katya Le Blanc

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Standard Operating Procedures Template for Highly Hazardous Chemicals Title of Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Standard Operating Procedures Template for Highly Hazardous Chemicals Title of Procedure: Date or the procedure.) Examples include: 1) Chemical hazards such as carcinogenic, irritant, corrosive, acutely toxic 2 of exposure associated with the procedure such as inhalation, injection, skin/eye contact) Exposure Limit: (As

436

PROCEDURES FOR ACCESS TO AND CORRECTION OF INFORMATION Procedural Authority: University Secretary Effective Date: January, 2010  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PROCEDURES FOR ACCESS TO AND CORRECTION OF INFORMATION Procedural Authority: University Secretary Effective Date: January, 2010 Procedural Officer: University Archivist Supersedes: New Last Editorial Change of these procedures is to set out how the university will manage: · freedom of information requests; · requests

Victoria, University of

437

Office of Departmental Personnel Security - Policy and Procedures  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Policy and Procedures Policy and Procedures Office of Departmental Personnel Security DOE Directives Clearance Access Matrix Executive Order 13467-Reforming Intelligence Reform and Terroroism Prevention Act of 2004 Extension of DOE N 470.5, Bond Renewal Final Notice Would Counseling/Treatment Cost Me My Security Clearance? 2005 Adjudicative Guidelines Implementation Executive Order 12968 10 CFR 710 Reciprocity Checklist * *This Checklist is provided pursuant to Appendix B of DOE O 472.2, Personnel Security, and must be utilized in accordance with the contents of that directive. This Checklist was issued by the Office of Management and Budget for use nationally across the Federal Government. Department of Energy Administrative Records Schedule 18: Security, Emergency Planning, and Safety Records, September 2010, Revision 2 (Personnel Security Records start on Page 17)

438

AlGaN UV LED and Photodiodes Radiation Hardness and Space Qualifications and Their Applications in Space Science and High Energy Density Physics  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This presentation provides an overview of robust, radiation hard AlGaN optoelectronic devices and their applications in space exploration & high energy density physics. Particularly, deep UV LED and deep UV photodiodes are discussed with regard to their applications, radiation hardness and space qualification. AC charge management of UV LED satellite payload instruments, which were to be launched in late 2012, is covered.

Sun, K. X.

2011-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

439

SMITH, GLEN. Bond Characteristics and Qualifications of Adhesives for Marine Applications and Steel Pipe Repair. (Under the direction of Dr. Sami Rizkalla.)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for marine application and repair of steel pipeline. #12;BOND CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALIFICATIONS OF ADHESIVES and Steel Pipe Repair. (Under the direction of Dr. Sami Rizkalla.) Performance of adhesives significantly FOR MARINE APPLICATIONS AND STEEL PIPE REPAIR By Glen E. Smith A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty

440

POLICY AND PROCEDURES REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF RESEARCH MISCONDUCT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

POLICY AND PROCEDURES REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF RESEARCH MISCONDUCT Policy Statement Research.................................................................................................1 Policy/Procedures AND PROCEDURES REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF RESEARCH MISCONDUCT 2 Contacts

Vertes, Akos

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Forecasting Dangerous Inmate Misconduct: An Applications of Ensemble Statistical Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Ensemble Statistical Procedures ? Richard A. Berk Brianpopular classi?cation procedures do no better than theand employ classi?cation procedures that identify inmates

Richard A. Berk; Brian Kriegler; Jong-Ho Baek

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Next of Kin and Emergency Contact Procedures | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Next of Kin and Emergency Contact Procedures Next of Kin and Emergency Contact Procedures DOE procedures for the maintenance of an employees emergency contact information and for...

443

Lockout-Tagout Standard Operating Procedures, Policy 2010-002...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Lockout-Tagout Standard Operating Procedures, Policy 2010-002 Lockout-Tagout Standard Operating Procedures, Policy 2010-002 Lockout-Tagout Standard Operating Procedures for...

444

Attachment 1: Green Lease Policies and Procedures for Lease Acquisitio...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

1: Green Lease Policies and Procedures for Lease Acquisition Attachment 1: Green Lease Policies and Procedures for Lease Acquisition Green Lease Policies and Procedures for Lease...

445

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Procedures 21.99.99.X0.01 Inventory Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Procedures 21.99.99.X0.01 Inventory Procedures Approved: JulyLife Extension Service Procedures 21.99.99.X0.01 Inventory Procedures Page 1 of 1 PROCEDURE STATEMENT Texas A in regulations. REASON FOR PROCEDURE This procedure outlines the process and responsibilities regarding

446

Test Procedure Waivers | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » Test Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » Test Procedure Waivers Test Procedure Waivers Products covered by standards change as manufacturers add new features to their products and update designs in order to compete for consumers. Innovation and product development occasionally causes products to change in ways that either (1) make the results of a test procedure unrepresentative of actual energy use or efficiency, or (2) make it impossible to test in accordance with the relevant test procedure. For this reason, the Department of Energy (DOE) considers petitions for waivers from test procedures under certain circumstances. In general, any interested party-typically a manufacturer-may submit a petition for a test procedure waiver for a basic model of a covered product

447

Building Technologies Office: Current Test Procedure Waivers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Test Procedure Waivers Test Procedure Waivers The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations for covered products permit a person to seek a waiver, or an interim waiver, from the test procedure requirements for covered appliances and commercial equipment if certain criteria are satisfied. Regulations applicable to test procedure waivers for appliances can be found at 10 CFR 430.27; those applicable to test procedure waivers for commercial equipment are at 10 CFR 431.401. This table lists all waivers to test procedures that DOE has granted and that are still in effect. The links to the notices provide access to the dockets in Regulations.gov, which contain all notices and public comments. For more information, please email: AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov The links to the notices provides access to the docket in regulations.gov, which contains all notices and public comments.

448

Project W-049H instrument and control Acceptance Test Procedure  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) for the Project W-049H, Treated Effluent Disposal Facility, is to verify that the instrument and control systems have been installed in accordance with the design documents and function as required by the project criteria. The instrument and control system includes three operator control stations, modems, and general purpose LAN interface cabinets in the Effluent Treatment Facility control room; two pump stations; disposal station pumping building; and all local control units installed in the fold. Testing will be performed using actual signals when available and simulated signals when actual signals are unavailable.

Carrigan, M.C.

1994-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

449

Minnesota Environmental Coordination Procedures Act (Minnesota) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Minnesota Environmental Coordination Procedures Act (Minnesota) Minnesota Environmental Coordination Procedures Act (Minnesota) Minnesota Environmental Coordination Procedures Act (Minnesota) < Back Eligibility Utility Fed. Government Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Residential Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Low-Income Residential Schools Retail Supplier Institutional Multi-Family Residential Systems Integrator Fuel Distributor Nonprofit General Public/Consumer Transportation Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Minnesota Program Type Siting and Permitting This Act is designed to streamline the review procedures for a given

450

Standards and Test Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures The Department of Energy (DOE) establishes energy efficiency standards for certain appliances and equipment, and currently covers more than 50 different products. Authority to undertake this effort was granted by Congress, and DOE follows a four phase process when reviewing existing and developing new standards. Each Product page provides information on recent updates, current standards and test procedures, waivers, exceptions, and exemptions, statutory authority, and historical information. For information on current Rulemakings, visit Current Rulemaking and Notices. Consumer Products Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Ceiling Fans Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Clothes Dryers

451

SPR Acquisition Procedures - Final Rulemaking | Department of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Point of Contact: Nathan Harvey, Director of Operatons and Readiness, Strategic Petroleum Reserve, (202) 586-4691 SPR Crude Oil Acquisition Procedures - Final Rulemaking More...

452

Sampling procedure for atmospheric geothermal brines  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Thermodynamic and chemical changes can alter the characteristics of geothermal brine samples significantly. A procedure which minimizes these changes has been developed for sampling atmospheric geothermal brines. The method is fast with minimal cooling and yields representative samples which have been stabilized to preserve their integrity. The procedure provides reliable suspended solids data and both the solid and liquid samples are suitable for elemental analysis. The procedure is also a valuable tool to aid in monitoring a geothermal brine conditioning system. Data are included from a flow test at an MCR Geothermal well in the Imperial Valley area of California to illustrate the utility of the sampling procedure.

Kochelek, J.T.; Zienty, D.F.

1981-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Proposal Submittal and Scheduling Procedures Entry Page  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Proposal Submittal and Scheduling Procedures for Research at SSRL X-rayVUV Macromolecular Crystallography SSRL is funded by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy...

454

Security Procedures for Golden Laboratories and Administration...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Security Procedures for Golden Laboratories and Administration Offices Visitors are required to show government-issued photo identification (for example driver's license, passport,...

455

Postdoctoral Extension Procedures | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Extension Procedures The Postdoctoral Office at DEP is responsible for processing the postdoctoral appointment extensions. It is important that all Argonne programmatic divisions...

456

Mentoring Policies and Procedures | Argonne National Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mentoring Policies and Procedures The Postdoctoral Mentoring Program follows a structured-facilitated design. This is a relatively formal program with support from the Laboratory....

457

Procedure for Certifying Renewable Energy Credit Generators ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

for Certifying Renewable Energy Credit Generators - Texas Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Reference: Procedure for Certifying Renewable Energy...

458

Additional Guidance Regarding Application of Current Procedures...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Additional Guidance Regarding Application of Current Procedures for Testing Energy Consumption of Clothes Washers with Warm Rinse Cycles, Issued: June 30, 2010 Additional Guidance...

459

Hazardous Material Packaging for Transport - Administrative Procedures  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establ1sh administrative procedures for the certification and use of radioactive and other hazardous materials packaging by the Department of Energy (DOE).

1986-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

460

J1634 SAE BEV Test Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

J1634 SAE BEV Test Procedures 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review June 09, 2010 Michael Duoba Argonne National Laboratory Sponsored by Lee Slezak...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE ACIDS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

12.1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE for ACIDS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS Location(s): ___________________________________________________ Chemical(s): Hypophosphorous acid, methylphosphonic acid, phosphonic acid, phosphoric acid, phosphorous

Pawlowski, Wojtek

462

New Mexico Antidegradation Policy Implementation Procedure |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Implementation Procedure Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: New Mexico Antidegradation Policy...

463

Hybrid LP/SDP Bounding Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hybrid LP/SDP Bounding Procedure. Fabio Furini1 and Emiliano Traversi2. 1 LIPN, Universit Paris 13, 93430 Villetaneuse, France.

2012-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

464

Generation Interconnection and Deliverability Allocation Procedures...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- Permit ApplicationPermit Application: Generation Interconnection and Deliverability Allocation ProceduresLegal Abstract Generation...

465

Results from the DOE Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Modular HTGR designs were developed to provide natural safety, which prevents core damage under all design basis accidents and presently envisioned severe accidents. The principle that guides their design concepts is to passively maintain core temperatures below fission product release thresholds under all accident scenarios. This level of fuel performance and fission product retention reduces the radioactive source term by many orders of magnitude and allows potential elimination of the need for evacuation and sheltering beyond a small exclusion area. This level, however, is predicated on exceptionally high fuel fabrication quality and performance under normal operation and accident conditions. Germany produced and demonstrated high quality fuel for their pebble bed HTGRs in the 1980s, but no U.S. manufactured fuel had exhibited equivalent performance prior to the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The design goal of the modular HTGRs is to allow elimination of an exclusion zone and an emergency planning zone outside the plant boundary fence, typically interpreted as being about 400 meters from the reactor. To achieve this, the reactor design concepts require a level of fuel integrity that is better than that claimed for all prior US manufactured TRISO fuel, by a few orders of magnitude. The improved performance level is about a factor of three better than qualified for German TRISO fuel in the 1980s. At the start of the AGR program, without a reactor design concept selected, the AGR fuel program selected to qualify fuel to an operating envelope that would bound both pebble bed and prismatic options. This resulted in needing a fuel form that could survive at peak fuel temperatures of 1250C on a time-averaged basis and high burnups in the range of 150 to 200 GWd/MTHM (metric tons of heavy metal) or 16.4 to 21.8% fissions per initial metal atom (FIMA). Although Germany has demonstrated excellent performance of TRISO-coated UO2 particle fuel up to about 10% FIMA and 1150C, UO2 fuel is known to have limitations because of CO formation and kernel migration at the high burnups, power densities, temperatures, and temperature gradients that may be encountered in the prismatic modular HTGRs. With uranium oxycarbide (UCO) fuel, the kernel composition is engineered to prevent CO formation and kernel migration, which are key threats to fuel integrity at higher burnups, temperatures, and temperature gradients. Furthermore, the recent poor fuel performance of UO2 TRISO fuel pebbles measured in Chinese irradiation testing in Russia and in German pebbles irradiated at 1250C, and historic data on poorer fuel performance in safety testing of German pebbles that experienced burnups in excess of 10% FIMA [1] have each raised concern about the use of UO2 TRISO above 10% FIMA and 1150C and the degree of margin available in the fuel system. This continues to be an active area of study internationally.

David Petti

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

DOE-STD-1146-2001; General Technical Base Qualification Standard DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

46-2001 46-2001 October 2001 DOE STANDARD GENERAL TECHNICAL BASE QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1146-2001 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior Department of Energy managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible

467

Verification Of The Defense Waste Processing Facility's (DWPF) Process Digestion Methods For The Sludge Batch 8 Qualification Sample  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report contains the results and comparison of data generated from inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) analysis of Aqua Regia (AR), Sodium Peroxide/Sodium Hydroxide Fusion Dissolution (PF) and Cold Chem (CC) method digestions and Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption analysis of Hg digestions from the DWPF Hg digestion method of Sludge Batch 8 (SB8) Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) Receipt and SB8 SRAT Product samples. The SB8 SRAT Receipt and SB8 SRAT Product samples were prepared in the SRNL Shielded Cells, and the SRAT Receipt material is representative of the sludge that constitutes the SB8 Batch or qualification composition. This is the sludge in Tank 51 that is to be transferred into Tank 40, which will contain the heel of Sludge Batch 7b (SB7b), to form the SB8 Blend composition.

Click, D. R.; Edwards, T. B.; Wiedenman, B. J.; Brown, L. W.

2013-03-18T23:59:59.000Z

468

Evaluation of Sludge Batch 5 Qualification with ISDP Salt Batch 1 Compliance to DWPF Waste Acceptance Criteria  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to document the acceptability of Sludge Batch 5 with the initial macrobatch operation of the Interim Salt Disposition Project (ISDP) waste to the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). This report was prepared to comply with the requirements listed in the Waste Acceptance Criteria for Sludge, Actinide Removal Process (ARP), and Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) Process Transfers to 512-S and DWPF. The requirements for transfers to 512-S were evaluated during ISDP Salt Batch 1 qualification. The calculations of sludge concentrations are based entirely on the Tank 51 sample processed at SRNL. This is conservative because Tank 51 is blended with the dilute feed in the DWPF Feed Tank (Tank 40). This report documents the acceptability of sludge only as well as Sludge Batch 5 sludge slurry combined with ARP/MCU products for feed to DWPF. All criteria were met for unblended Tank 51 material.

Shafer, A.

2010-05-05T23:59:59.000Z

469

UCSD Implementing Procedures Effective Date: July 1, 1996 Page 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UCSD Implementing Procedures (HR-S-1/Definitions of Terms B. UCSD Implementing Procedures 14/Affirmative Action C. UCSD Implementing Procedures 23/Performance Appraisal D. UC PPSM 30/Salary E. UCSD Implementing Procedures 30/Salary Equity Increase

Tsien, Roger Y.

470

Pollutant Assessments Group Procedures Manual: Volume 1, Administrative and support procedures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This manual describes procedures currently in use by the Pollutant Assessments Group. The manual is divided into two volumes: Volume 1 includes administrative and support procedures, and Volume 2 includes technical procedures. These procedures are revised in an ongoing process to incorporate new developments in hazardous waste assessment technology and changes in administrative policy. Format inconsistencies will be corrected in subsequent revisions of individual procedures. The purpose of the Pollutant Assessments Groups Procedures Manual is to provide a standardized set of procedures documenting in an auditable manner the activities performed by the Pollutant Assessments Group (PAG) of the Health and Safety Research Division (HASRD) of the Environmental Measurements and Applications Section (EMAS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The Procedures Manual ensures that the organizational, administrative, and technical activities of PAG conform properly to protocol outlined by funding organizations. This manual also ensures that the techniques and procedures used by PAG and other contractor personnel meet the requirements of applicable governmental, scientific, and industrial standards. The Procedures Manual is sufficiently comprehensive for use by PAG and contractor personnel in the planning, performance, and reporting of project activities and measurements. The Procedures Manual provides procedures for conducting field measurements and includes program planning, equipment operation, and quality assurance elements. Successive revisions of this manual will be archived in the PAG Document Control Department to facilitate tracking of the development of specific procedures.

Not Available

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

AGR-2 Data Qualification Report for ATR Cycles 149B, 150A, 150B, 151A, and 151B  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides the data qualification status of AGR-2 fuel irradiation experimental data from Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) cycles 149B, 150A, 150B, 151A, and 151B), as recorded in the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS). The AGR-2 data streams addressed include thermocouple temperatures, sweep gas data (flow rate, pressure, and moisture content), and fission product monitoring system (FPMS) data for each of the six capsules in the experiment. A total of 3,307,500 5-minute thermocouple and sweep gas data records were received and processed by NDMAS for this period. There are no AGR-2 data for cycle 150A because the experiment was removed from the reactor. Of these data, 82.2% were determined to be Qualified based on NDMAS accuracy testing and data validity assessment. There were 450,557 Failed temperature records due to thermocouple failures, and 138,528 Failed gas flow records due to gas flow cross-talk and leakage problems that occurred in the capsules after cycle 150A. For FPMS data, NDMAS received and processed preliminary release rate and release-to-birth rate ratio (R/B) data for the first three reactor cycles (cycles 149B, 150B, and 151B). This data consists of 45,983 release rate records and 45,235 R/B records for the 12 radionuclides reported. The qualification status of these FPMS data has been set to In Process until receipt of QA-approved data generator reports. All of the above data have been processed and tested using a SAS-based enterprise application software system, stored in a secure Structured Query Language database, and made available on the NDMAS Web portal (http://ndmas.inl.gov) for both internal and external VHTR project participants.

Michael L. Abbott; Binh T. Pham

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Optimization of proteomic sample preparation procedures for comprehens...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

proteomic sample preparation procedures for comprehensive protein characterization of pathogenic systems. Optimization of proteomic sample preparation procedures for comprehensive...

473

HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES -Major Projects  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES - Major Projects HEALTH & SAFETY UNIT SPRING 2006 #12;CONTENTS of this document is to provide the University with a summary of the principle activities in construction projects the reliance on physical controls and use of personnel protective equipment. The procedures that consider

474

Procedure Based Help Desk System Akira Takano  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

tools for help desk systems have become available [1]. When a help desk system is developed by usingProcedure Based Help Desk System Akira Takano Information Technology R&D Center Mitsubishi Electric kanae@isl.melco.co.jp ABSTRACT In this paper, we describe an outline of "Procedure based help desk

475

Policy Procedure Administrative Directive Policy No.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Policy � Procedure � Administrative Directive Title: Policy No.: Effective Date or Date of Last President See also: Related Policies, Procedures and Agreements: Relevant Legislation and Regulations: Background and Purpose: CLEAR DATA #12;Policy *A University Policy is a principle-based statement with broad

Northern British Columbia, University of

476

Spills of Radioactive Materials -Emergency Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to radioactive waste container. For surface decontamination, use soap and water and cleansers appropriateSpills of Radioactive Materials - Emergency Procedures Procedure: 7.53 Created: 1/16/2014 Version for injured personnel. B. Applicability/scope This policy applies to all facilities where radioactive

Jia, Songtao

477

Classification procedure in limited angle tomography system  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In this work we propose the use of limited angle reconstruction algorithms combined with a procedure for defect detection and feature evaluation in three dimensions. The procedure consists of the following steps: acquisition of the X-ray projections, approximated limited angle 3D image reconstruction, and image preprocessing and classification.

Chlewicki, W.; Baniukiewicz, P.; Chady, T.; Brykalski, A. [Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Westpomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin (Poland)

2011-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

478

CONTROL VALVE TESTING PROCEDURES AND EQUATIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

APPENDIX A CONTROL VALVE TESTING PROCEDURES AND EQUATIONS FOR LIQUID FLOWS #12;APPENDIX A CONTROL VALVE TESTING PROCEDURES AND EQUATIONS FOR LIQUID FLOWS 2 Cv Q P Sg net gpm net = / Cv = Q P / Sg 75 in this report is per Instrument Society of America S39.2 testing specifications for control valves. The main

Rahmeyer, William J.

479

Safe Operating Procedure (Created 5/11)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

://ehs.unl.edu (5/11) LOCKOUT/TAGOUT FOR MACHINES & EQUIPMENT: WRITTEN PROCEDURES during maintenance and repair operations. In these situations, a lockout/tagout (LO/TO) program must/TO procedures, as well as other program requirements. See EHS SOP, Lockout/Tagout for Machines & Equipment

Farritor, Shane

480

Colorado School of Mines Service Center Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

will usually develop and incorporate its own indirect cost rate in order to recover utilities, space School of Mines Service Center Procedures - 2 - I. PURPOSE CSM conducts research under Government sponsored awards. Therefore, service center procedures must reflect government regulatory costing principles

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "treatment procedure qualification" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Definition: Operating Procedure | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Procedure Procedure Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Operating Procedure A document that identifies specific steps or tasks that should be taken by one or more specific operating positions to achieve specific operating goal(s). The steps in an Operating Procedure should be followed in the order in which they are presented, and should be performed by the position(s) identified. A document that lists the specific steps for a system operator to take in removing a specific transmission line from service is an example of an Operating Procedure.[1] Related Terms transmission lines, transmission line References ↑ Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An i LikeLike UnlikeLike You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like. nline Glossary Definition Retrieved from

482

\\\\files.umn.edu\\DRS\\Shared\\Departmental Information\\Policies and Procedures Policies and Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 \\\\files.umn.edu\\DRS\\Shared\\Departmental Information\\Policies and Procedures Policies and Procedures Manual 2013-2014 (Updated 10/13) #12;2 Table of Contents General Policies 4 - 5 Appropriate User Groups Locker Rooms Climbing Wall 28 Court Sports 29-30 Participation Reservation Procedures #12

Amin, S. Massoud

483

Policy on Student Grievance Procedures February 15, 2013 110.00 POLICY ON STUDENT GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Policy on Student Grievance Procedures ­ February 15, 2013 110.00 POLICY ON STUDENT GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES 111.00 Chancellors shall develop and submit for approval by Student Academic Services in the Office of the President, and in consultation with the Office of General Counsel, procedures to resolve

California at Santa Cruz, University of

484

Appendix A: Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix A: Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures Committee on Student Conduct Hearing Procedures A. Introduction B. Parties to the Complaint C. Committee and Panels D. Cases of Physical. For the purpose of these procedures, the parties are identified as the University presenter and the accused

Amin, S. Massoud

485

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Duplicate and Replacement Parchments Diplomas and Certificates Procedures1.doc.doc  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Duplicate and Replacement Parchments Diplomas and Certificates Procedures1.doc.doc Complete Policy Title: Duplicate and Replacement Parchments, Diplomas and Certificates Procedures Policy Number (if applicable): Approved by: Senate Date of Most Recent Approval: March 14, 2007

Haykin, Simon

486

Texas A&M AgriLife Research Procedures 29.01.03.A0.01 Information Resource Procedures  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Texas A&M AgriLife Research Procedures 29.01.03.A0.01 Information Resource Procedures Approved, 2011 August 24, 2012 Next Scheduled Review: August 24, 2014 Texas A&M AgriLife Research Procedures 29.01.03.A0.01 Information Resource Procedures Page 1 of 19 PROCEDURE STATEMENT This procedure establishes

487

NREL: Biomass Research - Standard Procedures for Microalgal Biofuels  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Standard Procedures for Microalgal Biofuels Analysis Standard Procedures for Microalgal Biofuels Analysis Capabilities in Microalgal Analysis NREL's Algal Biofuels Research team can work with you to analyze the chemical composition of algae as a biomass feedstock. NREL develops laboratory analytical procedures (LAPs) for analyzing microalgal biofuels. These procedures help scientists and analysts understand more about the chemical composition of algae as a feedstock to convert to biofuels. For more procedures, see the biomass characterization LAPs. Laboratory Analytical Procedures NREL wrote these analytical procedures to help the research community analyze algae. Summative Mass Analysis of Algal Biomass - Integration of Analytical Procedures Download Procedure This procedure guides the integration of LAPs to measure algal biomass

488

Born-Oppenheimer Treatment of the Hydrogen Atom  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The main features of the treatment of the molecular problem by separation of electronic and nuclear motion and of the higher-order corrections to this procedure are brought out by the treatment of the exactly solvable two-body problem of the hydrogen atom.

V. K. Deshpande; J. Mahanty

1969-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

Readiness Assessment for MF-628 Drum Treatment Facility - Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project … 5-07  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS (OP) CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS (OP) Objective: OP.1 Adequate and correct procedures and safety limits are in place for operating the DTF ventilation system and conducting treatment activities. (CR1, CR-10) Criteria: a. All required procedures, AMOWs, PTWs, and work orders have been prepared, validated, and approved for all routine treatment and support activities. b. Procedures include actions for anticipated abnormal or emergency conditions. c. Workers have demonstrated their familiarity and knowledge of the procedures during interviews and mockup operations. Objective: OP.2 Routine drills have been prepared and conducted for the DTF drum treatment activities. (CR11) Criteria; a. Drills have been prepared that address the anticipated abnormal and

490

Study of two sampling procedures for the valorization of metal hydroxide sludge as pollutant trapper  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

treatment, CrVI 1 Introduction Industrial aqueous pollution (heavy metals) accounts for 30 to 40% of all1 Study of two sampling procedures for the valorization of metal hydroxide sludge as pollutant@emse.fr Abstract: For the valorisation of metal hydroxide sludge as adsorbent of pollutant, it is necessary to make

Boyer, Edmond

491

Policies and Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Communication & Engagement » EM SSAB » Policies and Services » Communication & Engagement » EM SSAB » Policies and Procedures Policies and Procedures The purpose of this document is to provide guidance regarding the operation of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB or Board). Policies and Procedures More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Regarding Delegation of Designated Federal Officials for Site Specific Advisory Boards EM SSAB Charter DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration Deactivation & Decommissioning (D&D) Facility Engineering Soil & Groundwater Sustainability Program Management Safety

492

Computational procedures for weighted projective spaces  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This is a pdf print of the homonymous Maple file, freely available at http://www.maplesoft.com/applications/view.aspx?SID=127621, providing procedures which are able to produce the toric data associated with a (polarized) weighted projective space i.e. fans, polytopes and their equivalences. More originally it provides procedures which are able to detect a weights vector Q starting from either a fan or a polytope: we will call this process the recognition of a (polarized) weighted projective space. Moreover it gives procedures connecting polytopes of a polarized weighted projective space with an associated fan and viceversa.

Rossi, Michele

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

The revised BS PD 6493 assessment procedure -- Application to offshore structures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The BS PD 6493 procedure for the assessment of defects in welded components, which was originally published in 1980 and subsequently revised in 1991, has been used with some success by industry and is now applied extensively to offshore structures. Particular applications are the fitness-for-purpose assessment of fabrication and in-service defects, inspection scheduling and the determination of whether post-weld heat treatment is required. However, the current BS PD 6493 procedure is based on general principles and the extensive application of the procedure to a wide range of complex practical problems over the years has highlighted some of its limitations. These have been addressed in the latest review by the British Standards Institution`s WEE/37 Committee and this has resulted in a major revision of the PD 6493 procedure. A particularly important development is the incorporation of specific guidance on the assessment of offshore structures. This paper describes the new recommendations for offshore structures.

Stacey, A. [Health and Safety Executive, London (United Kingdom). Offshore Safety Div.; Burdekin, F.M. [UMIST, Manchester (United Kingdom). Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering; Maddox, S.J. [Welding Inst., Cambridge (United Kingdom). Structural Integrity Dept.

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

494

Handicapped Parking Procedures (HQ) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Handicapped Parking Procedures (HQ) Handicapped Parking Procedures (HQ) Handicapped Parking Procedures (HQ) It is the policy of the Department of Energy (DOE) that its parking facility be operated in a manner responsive to the needs of the Department, and for the maximum benefit of its employees. Individuals with temporary or permanent mobility impairment who, because of their condition, have a need to request a handicapped parking permit for the Forrestal or Germantown facilities, should use the following procedures: Complete a Parking Application Complete the Permit Application form DOE F 1400.12. In instances when the Parking Management personnel can visually assess an applicant's mobility impairment (i.e. use of crutches, walker, etc.), a temporary parking permit may be granted. At the time of application, the

495

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

processes to promote development and operation of sustainable buildings. #12;Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Sustainable Building Policy Policy this electronic policy and the written copy held by the policy owner, the written copy prevails. Sustainable

Haykin, Simon

496

Verification and Monitoring: Requirements and Procedures  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

When a cleanroom is first installed or any significant changes ... and control. Many of the procedures for cleanroom monitoring are described in IES RP-006,...Recommended Practice for Testing Clean Ro...

Alvin Lieberman

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

497

MAES Project Review Procedures SEMINAR FORMAT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MAES Project Review Procedures SEMINAR FORMAT The peer review seminar will be styled after oral the project's past accomplishments (if renewal) Discuss the new project proposal 2. Open Discussion ­ (approx

Maxwell, Bruce D.

498

General Construction Company Private Development Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

administration and subcontractor management in the execution of each project. Generals current operations are very conducive to private development. However, the company can no longer rely on an oral system to relay historical processes and procedures...

Eason, Scott W.

2006-05-19T23:59:59.000Z

499

Financial Policy and Procedures for Reimbursable Work  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The directive establishes Department-wide financial policy and procedural guidance applicable to performing reimbursable work for other Federal agencies and with non-Federal Government entities, including foreign and commercial entities, State, and political subdivisions.

1988-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

500

PROCEDURE COVER SHEET Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Quality Assurance/Quality Control AC Power Maintenance and Operations Division Energy Conversion Systems Only" training for Administrative, Alarm Response, and Emergency Operations procedures must Engineering Environmental Restoration & Waste Management Division Water Systems Neutral Beam (Heating Systems

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory