Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Final Hanford Offsite Waste Shipment Leaves Idaho Treatment Facility...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Hanford Offsite Waste Shipment Leaves Idaho Treatment Facility Final Hanford Offsite Waste Shipment Leaves Idaho Treatment Facility August 18, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Idaho...

2

EIS-0325: Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project Final...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0325: Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project Final Environmental Impact Statement, EIS-0325 (January 2003) EIS-0325: Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project...

3

Hanford Railcars Make Final Stop at B Reactor: Move Enhances...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Make Final Stop at B Reactor: Move Enhances Visitor Experience at Historic Reactor Hanford Railcars Make Final Stop at B Reactor: Move Enhances Visitor Experience at Historic...

4

Final Hanford Offsite Waste Shipment Leaves Idaho Treatment Facility |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Hanford Offsite Waste Shipment Leaves Idaho Treatment Final Hanford Offsite Waste Shipment Leaves Idaho Treatment Facility Final Hanford Offsite Waste Shipment Leaves Idaho Treatment Facility August 18, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Idaho State Patrol Troopers Rick Stouse and Tony Anderson inspected the TRUPACTS, containers which contain TRU waste, and trailer containing the final shipment of Hanford offsite waste. The Idaho State Patrol officers have played an important role in AMWTP's success by inspecting every one of AMWTP's nearly 3,900 shipments. Idaho State Patrol Troopers Rick Stouse and Tony Anderson inspected the TRUPACTS, containers which contain TRU waste, and trailer containing the final shipment of Hanford offsite waste. The Idaho State Patrol officers have played an important role in AMWTP's success by inspecting every one of

5

Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This Final ''Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement'' (HCP EIS) is being used by the Department of Energy (DOE) and its nine cooperating and consulting agencies to develop a comprehensive land-use plan (CLUP) for the Hanford Site. The DOE will use the Final HCP EIS as a basis for a Record of Decision (ROD) on a CLUP for the Hanford Site. While development of the CLUP will be complete with release of the HCP EIS ROD, full implementation of the CLUP is expected to take at least 50 years. Implementation of the CLUP would begin a more detailed planning process for land-use and facility-use decisions at the Hanford Site. The DOE would use the CLUP to screen proposals. Eventually, management of Hanford Site areas would move toward the CLUP land-use goals. This CLUP process could take more than 50 years to fully achieve the land-use goals.

N /A

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

6

Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement (9/22/1999)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cover Sheet Cover Sheet Final HCP EIS | Cover Sheet 1 2 3 Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 4 5 Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management, Bureau 6 of Reclamation, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Benton, Franklin, and Grant counties; and 7 the City of Richland, Washington 8 | 9 Consulting Tribal Governments: Nez Perce Tribe Department of Environmental Restoration 10 and Waste Management and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 11 12 Title: Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement 13 | (HCP EIS), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington 14 | 15 Contacts: For further information on this EIS call or contact: 16 17 Thomas W. Ferns, HCP EIS Document Manager 18 | U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office

7

Informe Final Sobre el Estudio de las Enfermedades de la Tiroides en Hanford  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Resumen del Informe Final Sobre el Estudio de las Enfermedades de la Tiroides en Hanford WASHINGTON O R E G O N IDAHO HANFORD Acerca del Estudio Sobre las Enfermedades de la Tiroides en Hanford. (HTDS por su sigla en inglés) El estudio sobre las enfermedades de la tiroides en Hanford (HTDS por su sigla

8

Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement (9/22/1999)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS EIS Summary Cover Sheet 1 2 3 Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 4 5 Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management, Bureau 6 of Reclamation, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Benton, Franklin, and Grant counties; and 7 the City of Richland, Washington 8 | 9 Consulting Tribal Governments: Nez Perce Tribe Department of Environmental Restoration 10 and Waste Management and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 11 12 Title: Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement 13 | (HCP EIS), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington 14 | 15 Contacts: For further information on this EIS call or contact: 16 17 Thomas W. Ferns, HCP EIS Document Manager 18 | U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office

9

Hanford  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Cleanup Site The Hanford Site mission focuses on environmental restoration, waste management, related scientific and environmental research and development of radioactive...

10

Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Department of Army U.S. Department of Defense January 2003 Final Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Agencies: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Richland Operations Office (RL); U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Army (USDOA); U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Title of Proposed Project: Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project - DOE/EIS-0325 State Involved: Washington Abstract: BPA proposes to construct a new 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in central Washington. This project

11

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COVER SHEET COVER SHEET U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286F) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (509) 376-6536 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, EH-42 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

12

Hanford Railcars Make Final Stop at B Reactor: Move Enhances Visitor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Railcars Make Final Stop at B Reactor: Move Enhances Hanford Railcars Make Final Stop at B Reactor: Move Enhances Visitor Experience at Historic Reactor Hanford Railcars Make Final Stop at B Reactor: Move Enhances Visitor Experience at Historic Reactor May 10, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Cameron Hardy, DOE (509) 376-5365 Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov Andre Armstrong, CH2M HILL (509) 376-6773 Andre_l_Armstrong@rl.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - Two locomotives that hauled irradiated fuel around the Hanford Site for a half-century will reach their final stop this week when they are delivered to the Historic B Reactor for preservation and public display. The two locomotives are among 16 railcars from Hanford's 200 North Area being removed by Department of Energy (DOE) contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL).

13

Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage Of Hanford Tank Wastes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1995/01eis0212_cl.html[6/27/2011 1:02:59 PM] 1995/01eis0212_cl.html[6/27/2011 1:02:59 PM] Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage Of Hanford Tank Wastes DOE/EIS-0212 VOLUME 1 OF 2 VOLUME 1 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SAFE INTERIM STORAGE OF HANFORD TANK WASTES Hanford Site Richland, Washington October, 1995 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY NUCLEAR WASTE PROGRAM LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE

14

Title  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name Title Date Cap and Trade: the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2007 John Steelman April 2011 The Future of Onshore Oil & Gas Production 1 Largest New Source: Existing...

15

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Analysis Report (HNF-SD-WM-SAR-062, Revision 14C) for the Sludge Treatment Project at the Hanford Site. 2.0 BACKGROUND The Sludge Treatment Project manages the removal of...

16

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report (HNF-SD-WM-SAR-062, Revision 14C) for the Sludge Treatment Project at the Hanford Site. 2.0 BACKGROUND The Sludge Treatment Project manages the removal of radioactive...

17

FINAL FRONTIER AT HANFORD TACKLING THE CENTRAL PLATEAU  

SciTech Connect

The large land area in the center of the vast Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site in southeast Washington State is known as 'the plateau'--aptly named because its surface elevations are 250-300 feet above the groundwater table. By contrast, areas on the 585-square mile Site that border the Columbia River sit just 30-80 feet above the water table. The Central Plateau, which covers an ellipse of approximately 70 square miles, contains Hanford's radiochemical reprocessing areas--the 200 East and 200 West Areas--and includes the most highly radioactive waste and contaminated facilities on the Site. Five 'canyons' where chemical processes were used to separate out plutonium (Pu), 884 identified soil waste sites (including approximately 50 miles of solid waste burial trenches), more than 900 structures, and all of Hanford's liquid waste storage tanks reside in the Central Plateau. (Notes: Canyons is a nickname given by Hanford workers to the chemical reprocessing facilities. The 177, underground waste tanks at Hanford comprise a separate work scope and are not under Fluor's management). Fluor Hanford, a DOE prime cleanup contractor at the Site for the past 12 years, has moved aggressively to investigate Central Plateau waste sites in the last few years, digging more than 500 boreholes, test pits, direct soil 'pushes' or drive points; logging geophysical data sets; and performing electrical-resistivity scans (a non-intrusive technique that maps patterns of sub-surface soil conductivity). The goal is to identify areas of contamination areas in soil and solid waste sites, so that cost-effective and appropriate decisions on remediation can be made. In 2007, Fluor developed a new work plan for DOE that added 238 soil waste-site characterization activities in the Central Plateau during fiscal years (FYs) 2007-2010. This number represents a 50 percent increase over similar work previously done in central Hanford. Work Plans are among the required steps in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) cleanup process. The CERCLA process is used to oversee the investigation, decision-making and remediation of 'past practices' (historical) sites, as opposed to sites in active use. For the first several years of Hanford's cleanup work, everyone concerned--the Department, contractors, regulatory agencies, stakeholders and Indian nations and tribes--focused efforts on the rivershore. The magnificent Columbia River--eighth largest in the world--flows through and by the Hanford Site for 52 miles. Two million people live downstream from Hanford along the Columbia before it empties into the Pacific Ocean. Further, the part of the river known as the 'Hanford Reach' is a prime habitat for salmon, steelhead, sturgeon and other species of fish. In fact, it provides a spawning ground to more salmon than any other stretch of river in the United States outside of Alaska. For these reasons, protecting the Columbia by cleaning up waste directly along its shoreline was an early priority in Hanford's Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (or Tri-Party Agreement) signed in 1989 among the DOE, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Washington State to govern cleanup. However, Tri-Party Agreement signatories and others concerned with Hanford and the Columbia River, knew that the waste located in, and beneath, the Central Plateau could also pose dangers to the waterway. While the waste in central Hanford might move more slowly, and pose fewer immediate threats, it would have to be dealt with as cleanup progressed.

GERBER MS

2008-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

18

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Unconventional Resources Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Recommendations - 2007 Annual Plan Brad Tomer, Director Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil January 29, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Federal Advisory Committee Recommendations for 2007 Draft Plan * All recommendations were accepted - Incorporated into the final 2007 Annual Plan - Addressed in an otherwise appropriate manner * This review is designed to briefly re-state summarized recommendations and DOE's response. Detailed discussions should be deferred until later in the day. Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Sub-Groups * Technology Transfer * Regulations * Water and Environmental Management * Production Research Themes

19

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee Recommendations - 2007 Annual Plan Brad Tomer, Director Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil January 30, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Federal Advisory Committee Recommendations for 2007 Draft Plan * All recommendations were accepted - Incorporated into the final 2007 Annual Plan - Addressed in an otherwise appropriate manner * This review is designed to briefly re-state summarized recommendations and DOE's response. Detailed discussions should be deferred until later in the day. Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee Sub-Groups * R&D Theme Content * Solicitation Process * Environmental * Access Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil UDAC Recommendations for 2007 Plan

20

Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HSW HSW EIS January 2004 1.6 Figure 1.2. States with Radioactive Waste Disposal Activities Final HSW EIS January 2004 1.12 Figure 1.3. Relationship of the HSW EIS to Other Hanford Cleanup Operations, Material Management Activities, and Key Environmental Reviews 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.34 Figure 2.18. Typical Liner System Final HSW EIS January 2004 2.36

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

ABSTRACT FINAL ID: PP21D-03; TITLE: Quantifying Kinetic Isotope Effect in Speleothems Through Clumped and Oxygen  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ABSTRACT FINAL ID: PP21D-03; TITLE: Quantifying Kinetic Isotope Effect in Speleothems Through Clumped and Oxygen Isotopes in Laboratory Precipitation Experiments SESSION TYPE: Oral SESSION TITLE: PP21 INSTITUTIONS (ALL): 1. Dept. of Geology & Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States. 2. Inst

22

GEOHYDROLOGICAL STUDIES FOR NUCLEAR WASTE ISOLATION AT THE HANFORD RESERVATION -- Vol. I: Executive Summary; Vol. II: Final Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NUCLEAR WASTE ISOLATION AT THE HANFORD RESERVATION Volume I:of Washington state." Rockwell Hanford Operations Topicalmodel evaluation at the Hanford nuclear waste facility."

Apps, J.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

2005 Hanford FU Worker Vapor and Occ Med new blue-final.cdr  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

... 27 Abbreviations Used in This Report AMH AdvanceMed Hanford BNI Bechtel National, Incorporated CAIRS Computerized AccidentIncident Reporting...

24

Testing of organic waste surrogate materials in support of the Hanford organic tank program. Final report  

SciTech Connect

To address safety issues regarding effective waste management efforts of underground organic waste storage tanks at the Hanford Site, the Bureau of Mines conducted a series of tests, at the request of the Westinghouse Hanford company. In this battery of tests, the thermal and explosive characteristics of surrogate materials, chosen by Hanford, were determined. The surrogate materials were mixtures of inorganic and organic sodium salts, representing fuels and oxidants. The oxidants were sodium nitrate and sodium nitrite. The fuels were sodium salts of oxalate, citrate and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). Polyethylene powder was also used as a fuel with the oxidant(s). Sodium aluminate was used as a diluent. In addition, a sample of FeCN, supplied by Hanford was also investigated.

Turner, D.A. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Miron, Y. [Bureau of Mines (United States)

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

GEOHYDROLOGICAL STUDIES FOR NUCLEAR WASTE ISOLATION AT THE HANFORD RESERVATION -- Vol. I: Executive Summary; Vol. II: Final Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

be D. Review'of Hanford Well Logs The work performed in 1978Hanford Operatibns (Rockwell) during Fiscal Year This workHanford Operations (Rockwell) during Fiscal Year 1978. This work

Apps, J.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

Microsoft Word - FY2009 2010 TITLE X STATUS REPORT Final.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

... D-1 Appendix E: Status of Licensees' Remaining Costs Eligible for Future Claims...E-1 Appendix F: Title X Site Remedial...

27

Microsoft Word - 2010 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project Visit _May 17-19 2010_ _final_  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tour of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - May 17-19, 2010 Tour of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - May 17-19, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an orientation visit to the Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington during the period May 17-19, with DOE-RL managers/staff and contractor managers and supporting staff responsible for the ongoing K-Basins Sludge Treatment Project. The purpose of the visit was to ascertain ways in which HSS would be able to carry out its independent oversight responsibilities with respect to this project in a method that encourages collaboration with DOE-RL. The K-Basin Sludge Treatment Project involves transferring sludge that has been recovered from

28

Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc. integrated safety management system phase 1 verification final report  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this review is to verify the adequacy of documentation as submitted to the Approval Authority by Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. (FDH). This review is not only a review of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) System Description documentation, but is also a review of the procedures, policies, and manuals of practice used to implement safety management in an environment of organizational restructuring. The FDH ISMS should support the Hanford Strategic Plan (DOE-RL 1996) to safely clean up and manage the site's legacy waste; deploy science and technology while incorporating the ISMS theme to ''Do work safely''; and protect human health and the environment.

PARSONS, J.E.

1999-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

29

HANFORD MEDIUM-LOW CURIE WASTE PRETREATMENT ALTERNATIVES PROJECT FRACTIONAL CRYSTALLIZATION PILOT SCALE TESTING FINAL REPORT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fractional Crystallization Pilot Plant was designed and constructed to demonstrate that fractional crystallization is a viable way to separate the high-level and low-activity radioactive waste streams from retrieved Hanford single-shell tank saltcake. The focus of this report is to review the design, construction, and testing details of the fractional crystallization pilot plant not previously disseminated.

HERTING DL

2008-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

30

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0189-FEIS-Summary-1996.HTM[6/27/2011 11:21:59 AM] The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to analyze the potential environmental impacts of their proposed actions to assist them in making informed decisions. A similar Washington State law, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), requires State agencies, including the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), to analyze environmental impacts before making decisions that could impact the environment. A major emphasis of both laws is to promote public awareness of these actions and provide opportunities for public involvement. Because NEPA and SEPA requirements are similar, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Ecology

31

TITLE Final Environmental Impact Statement for the JEA Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustor Project;  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CONTACT Additional copies or information concerning this final environmental impact statement (EIS) can be

unknown authors

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Hanford Tanks Initiative alternate retrieval system demonstrations - final report of testing performed by Grey Pilgrim LLC  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A waste retrieval system has been defined to provide a safe and cost-effective solution to the Hanford Tanks Initiative. This system consists of the EMMA robotic manipulator (by GreyPilgrim LLC) and the lightweight Scarifier (by Waterjet Technology, Inc.) powered by a 36-kpsi Jet-Edge diesel powered high pressure pumping system. For demonstration and testing purposes, an air conveyance system was utilized to remove the waste from the simulated tank floor. The EMMA long reach manipulator utilized for this demonstration was 33 feet long. It consisted of 4 hydraulically controlled stages of varying lengths and coupling configurations. T

Berglin, E.J.

1997-07-24T23:59:59.000Z

33

Decommissioning of eight surplus production reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Addendum (Final Environmental Impact Statement)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The first section of this volume summarizes the content of the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) and this Addendum, which together constitute the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) prepared on the decommissioning of eight surplus plutonium production reactors at Hanford. The FEIS consists of two volumes. The first volume is the DEIS as written. The second volume (this Addendum) consists of a summary; Chapter 9, which contains comments on the DEIS and provides DOE`s responses to the comments; Appendix F, which provides additional health effects information; Appendix K, which contains costs of decommissioning in 1990 dollars; Appendix L, which contains additional graphite leaching data; Appendix M, which contains a discussion of accident scenarios; Appendix N, which contains errata; and Appendix 0, which contains reproductions of the letters, transcripts, and exhibits that constitute the record for the public comment period.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

Final AOP Renewal 2 Statement of Basis For Hanford Site Air Operating Permit No. 00-05-006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

referred to as the permitting agencies, as a separate supporting reference document to the Hanford Air Operating Permit (AOP). The Statement sets forth the legal and factual basis for the AOP conditions, and is not intended for enforcement purposes. The Statement includes references to the applicable statutory or regulatory provisions, technical supporting information on specific emission units, and clarifications of specific requirements. [Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-401-700(8)] In 1990, U.S. Congress amended the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). One of those amendments created air operating permits for industrial sources of air pollution (codified in Title 5 of the CAA). Prior to the creation of these permits, facility managers, regulators and the public had to look through many separate requirements to find those that applied to a certain facility. An air operating permit brings all applicable requirements into one place and requires the manager of the source to certify that it complies with all the applicable requirements. Further, the burden of proof for compliance changed from the regulating agencies to the sources.

unknown authors

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Macroencapsulation of mixed waste debris at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation -- Final project report by AST Environmental Services, LLC  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes the results of a full-scale demonstration of a high density polyethylene (HDPE) package, manufactured by Arrow Construction, Inc. of Montgomery, Alabama. The HDPE package, called ARROW-PAK, was designed and patented by Arrow as both a method to macroencapsulation of radioactively contaminated lead and as an improved form of waste package for treatment and interim and final storage and/or disposal of drums of mixed waste. Mixed waste is waste that is radioactive, and meets the criteria established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) for a hazardous material. Results from previous testing conducted for the Department of Energy (DOE) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory in 1994 found that the ARROW-PAK fabrication process produces an HDPE package that passes all helium leak tests and drop tests, and is fabricated with materials impervious to the types of environmental factors encountered during the lifetime of the ARROW-PAK, estimated to be from 100 to 300 years. Arrow Construction, Inc. has successfully completed full-scale demonstration of its ARROW-PAK mixed waste macroencapsulation treatment unit at the DOE Hanford Site. This testing was conducted in accordance with Radiological Work Permit No. T-860, applicable project plans and procedures, and in close consultation with Waste Management Federal Services of Hanford, Inc.`s project management, health and safety, and quality assurance representatives. The ARROW-PAK field demonstration successfully treated 880 drums of mixed waste debris feedstock which were compacted and placed in 149 70-gallon overpack drums prior to macroencapsulation in accordance with the US EPA Alternate Debris Treatment Standards, 40 CFR 268.45. Based on all of the results, the ARROW-PAK process provides an effective treatment, storage and/or disposal option that compares favorably with current mixed waste management practices.

Baker, T.L.

1998-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

36

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Title I operator dose calculations. Final report, LATA report No. 90  

SciTech Connect

The radiation exposure dose was estimated for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) operating personnel who do the unloading and transporting of the transuranic contact-handled waste. Estimates of the radiation source terms for typical TRU contact-handled waste were based on known composition and properties of the waste. The operations sequence for waste movement and storage in the repository was based upon the WIPP Title I data package. Previous calculations had been based on Conceptual Design Report data. A time and motion sequence was developed for personnel performing the waste handling operations both above and below ground. Radiation exposure calculations were then performed in several fixed geometries and folded with the time and motion studies for individual workers in order to determine worker exposure on an annual basis.

Hughes, P.S.; Rigdon, L.D.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Hanford - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality, August 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant...

38

EIS-0325: Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project Final Environmental Impact Statement, EIS-0325 (January 2003)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

BPA proposes to construct a new 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in central Washington. This project would increase transmission system capacity north of Hanford.

39

HANFORD CONTAINERIZED CAST STONE FACILITY TASK 1 PROCESS TESTING & DEVELOPMENT FINAL TEST REPORT [SEC 1 & 2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Laboratory testing and technical evaluation activities on Containerized Cast Stone (CCS) were conducted under the Scope of Work (SOW) contained in CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. (CHG) Contract No. 18548 (CHG 2003a). This report presents the results of testing and demonstration activities discussed in SOW Section 3.1, Task I--''Process Development Testing'', and described in greater detail in the ''Containerized Grout--Phase I Testing and Demonstration Plan'' (CHG, 2003b). CHG (2003b) divided the CCS testing and evaluation activities into six categories, as follows: (1) A short set of tests with simulant to select a preferred dry reagent formulation (DRF), determine allowable liquid addition levels, and confirm the Part 2 test matrix. (2) Waste form performance testing on cast stone made from the preferred DRF and a backup DRF, as selected in Part I, and using low activity waste (LAW) simulant. (3) Waste form performance testing on cast stone made from the preferred DRF using radioactive LAW. (4) Waste form validation testing on a selected nominal cast stone formulation using the preferred DRF and LAW simulant. (5) Engineering evaluations of explosive/toxic gas evolution, including hydrogen, from the cast stone product. (6) Technetium ''getter'' testing with cast stone made with LAW simulant and with radioactive LAW. In addition, nitrate leaching observations were drawn from nitrate leachability data obtained in the course of the Parts 2 and 3 waste form performance testing. The nitrate leachability index results are presented along with other data from the applicable activity categories.

LOCKREM, L.L.

2005-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

40

Help - Titles  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

data in the bibliographic records for all holdings of the 10 ANL Libraries. A title query will search the fields shown below. Title Alternate Title Publisher's Serial Title...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Spawning Habitat Studies of Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Final Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory conducted this study for the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) with funding provided through the Northwest Power and Conservation Council(a) and the BPA Fish and Wildlife Program. The study was conducted in the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River. The goal of study was to determine the physical habitat factors necessary to define the redd capacity of fall Chinook salmon that spawn in large mainstem rivers like the Hanford Reach and Snake River. The study was originally commissioned in FY 1994 and then recommissioned in FY 2000 through the Fish and Wildlife Program rolling review of the Columbia River Basin projects. The work described in this report covers the period from 1994 through 2004; however, the majority of the information comes from the last four years of the study (2000 through 2004). Results from the work conducted from 1994 to 2000 were covered in an earlier report. More than any other stock of Pacific salmon, fall Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) have suffered severe impacts from the hydroelectric development in the Columbia River Basin. Fall Chinook salmon rely heavily on mainstem habitats for all phases of their life cycle, and mainstem hydroelectric dams have inundated or blocked areas that were historically used for spawning and rearing. The natural flow pattern that existed in the historic period has been altered by the dams, which in turn have affected the physical and biological template upon which fall Chinook salmon depend upon for successful reproduction. Operation of the dams to produce power to meet short-term needs in electricity (termed power peaking) produces unnatural fluctuations in flow over a 24-hour cycle. These flow fluctuations alter the physical habitat and disrupt the cues that salmon use to select spawning sites, as well as strand fish in near-shore habitat that becomes dewatered. The quality of spawning gravels has been affected by dam construction, flood protection, and agricultural and industrial development. In some cases, the riverbed is armored such that it is more difficult for spawners to move, while in other cases the intrusion of fine sediment into spawning gravels has reduced water flow to sensitive eggs and young fry. Recovery of fall Chinook salmon populations may involve habitat restoration through such actions as dam removal and reservoir drawdown. In addition, habitat protection will be accomplished through set-asides of existing high-quality habitat. A key component to evaluating these actions is quantifying the salmon spawning habitat potential of a given river reach so that realistic recovery goals for salmon abundance can be developed. Quantifying salmon spawning habitat potential requires an understanding of the spawning behavior of Chinook salmon, as well as an understanding of the physical habitat where these fish spawn. Increasingly, fish biologists are recognizing that assessing the physical habitat of riverine systems where salmon spawn goes beyond measuring microhabitat like water depth, velocity, and substrate size. Geomorphic features of the river measured over a range of spatial scales set up the physical template upon which the microhabitat develops, and successful assessments of spawning habitat potential incorporate these geomorphic features. We had three primary objectives for this study. The first objective was to determine the relationship between physical habitats at different spatial scales and fall Chinook salmon spawning locations. The second objective was to estimate the fall Chinook salmon redd capacity for the Reach. The third objective was to suggest a protocol for determining preferable spawning reaches of fall Chinook salmon. To ensure that we collected physical data within habitat that was representative of the full range of potential spawning habitat, the study area was stratified based on geomorphic features of the river using a two-dimensional river channel index that classified the river cross section into one of four shapes based on channel symmetry, depth, and width. We found t

Geist, David R.; Arntzen, Evan V.; Chien, Yi-Ju (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

2009-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

42

Hanford Site Video Library  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The Hanford Site Video Library currently makes 30 videos related to the sites history and the clean-up available for online viewing. The Video Library (also referred to as the Broadcast Archive) can be searched by keywords in the title or description. They can also be browsed in a complete list.

43

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

44

Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review, August 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report Site Visit Report Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review May 2011 August 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

45

TITLE PAGE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title: Seismic and Rockphysics Diagnostics of Title: Seismic and Rockphysics Diagnostics of Multiscale Reservoir Textures Type of Report: Final Technical Reporting Start Date: April 1, 2005 Reporting End Date: June 30, 2005 Principal Investigator: Prof. Gary Mavko Date of Report: July 2005 DOE Award Number: DE-FC26-01BC15354 Submitting Organization: Stanford University, 651 Serra Street, Suite 260, Stanford, CA 94305-4125 1 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warrantee, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not

46

Title Standards 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards 2001 Standards 2001 A guide for the preparation of title evidence in land acquisitions by the United States of America. Quick links to Contents: Table of Contents / Why Title Standards 2001, and who uses it? / Evidence of title / Abstract of Title Supplemental and Supporting Title Evidence / Title Insurance Policies and Certificates of Title / Final Title Evidence Title Evidence for Condemnations / The Deed to the United States / Special Standards for Texas / Sample Forms U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Land Acquisition Section Washington, D.C. 20530 December 29, 2000 (reprint March 23, 2001) [Editor's Note: The reprint of March 23, 2001, added page numbers to the table of contents; added a new item "3" to part B of Form # 1 of the Certificate of Inspection and Possession,

47

--No Title--  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A mixed waste treatability study will be performed to test the fluidized bed steam reforming (FBSR) technology on SRS Low Activity Waste (LAW) modified to simulate Hanford waste....

48

--No Title--  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Simulants of Hanford secondary waste (HSW) using rhenium as a surrogate for technetium will be prepared and characterized. Improving Technetium Retention in Secondary Waste...

49

Document Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

been reproduced from the best available copy. Printed in the United States of America DOEEA-1934 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment for Expansion of Borrow Areas on the Hanford...

50

Redd Site Selection and Spawning Habitat Use by Fall Chinook Salmon, Hanford Reach, Columbia River : Final Report 1995 - 1998.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes results of research activities conducted from 1995 through 1998 on identifying the spawning habitat requirements of fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River. The project investigated whether traditional spawning habitat models could be improved in order to make better predictions of available habitat for fall chinook salmon in the Snake River. Results suggest models could be improved if they used spawning area-specific, rather than river-specific, spawning characteristics; incorporated hyporheic discharge measurements; and gave further consideration to the geomorphic features that are present in the unconstrained segments of large alluvial rivers. Ultimately the recovery of endangered fall chinook salmon will depend on how well we are able to recreate the characteristics once common in alluvial floodplains of large rivers. The results from this research can be used to better define the relationship between these physical habitat characteristics and fall chinook salmon spawning site selection, and provide more efficient use of limited recovery resources. This report is divided into four chapters which were presented in the author's doctoral dissertation which he completed through the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at Oregon State University. Each of the chapters has been published in peer reviewed journals or is currently under review. Chapter one is a conceptual spawning habitat model that describes how geomorphic features of river channels create hydraulic processes, including hyporheic flows, that influence where salmon spawn in unconstrained reaches of large mainstem alluvial rivers. Chapter two describes the comparison of the physical factors associated with fall chinook salmon redd clusters located at two sites within the Reach. Spatial point pattern analysis of redds showed that redd clusters averaged approximately 10 hectares in area and their locations were consistent from year to year. The tendency to spawn in clusters suggests fall chinook salmon's use of spawning habitat is highly selective. Hydraulic characteristics of the redd clusters were significantly different than the habitat surrounding them. Velocity and lateral slope of the river bottom were the most important habitat variables in predicting redd site selection. While these variables explained a large proportion of the variance in redd site selection (86 to 96%), some unmeasured factors still accounted for a small percentage of actual spawning site selection. Chapter three describes the results from an investigation into the hyporheic characteristics of the two spawning areas studied in chapter two. This investigation showed that the magnitude and chemical characteristics of hyporheic discharge were different between and within two spawning areas. Apparently, fall chinook salmon used chemical and physical cues from the discharge to locate spawning areas. Finally, chapter four describes a unique method that was developed to install piezometers into the cobble bed of the Columbia River.

Geist, David R.

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Development of A Bayesian Geostatistical Data Assimilation Method and Application to the Hanford 300 Area  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Field, 300 Area, Hanford Site PNNL-18340, Pacific Northwestat the Hanford Site 300 Area, PNNL-16396, Pacific Northwestinjection: Final Report, PNNL-18529, Pacific Northwest

Murakami, Haruko

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

will conduct a mixing demonstration of the Hanford AY-102 High level Waste (HLW) tank. This testing will be conducted in 786-A. The test is a visual type of demonstration where no...

53

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A mixed waste treatability study will be performed to test the fluidized bed steam reforming (FBSR) technology on two caustic Hanford waste streams (SX-105 and An-103). The tests...

54

Hanford wells  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Records describing wells located on or near the Hanford Site have been maintained by Pacific Northwest Laboratory and the operating contractor, Westinghouse Hanford Company. In support of the Ground-Water Surveillance Project, portions of the data contained in these records have been compiled into the following report, which is intended to be used by those needing a condensed, tabular summary of well location and basic construction information. The wells listed in this report were constructed over a period of time spanning almost 70 years. Data included in this report were retrieved from the Hanford Envirorunental Information System (HEIS) database and supplemented with information not yet entered into HEIS. While considerable effort has been made to obtain the most accurate and complete tabulations possible of the Hanford Site wells, omissions and errors may exist. This document does not include data on lithologic logs, ground-water analyses, or specific well completion details.

Chamness, M.A.; Merz, J.K.

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

EIS-0286: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0286: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid Waste Program, Richland, Washington Hanford...

56

Implementation plan for Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 280 and 281; Final rules for underground storage tanks  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the schedules and methods required to comply with the newly promulgated Underground Storage Tank (UST) Regulations Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 280 and 281. These rules were promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on September 23, 1988, and became effective December 22, 1988. These regulations are required by Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976. Their purpose is to protect the groundwater supplies of the United States in the following ways: Closing old tanks; detecting and remediating tank leaks and spills; establishing stringent standards for new tanks; and upgrade of existing tanks to new-tank standards. 3 refs., 5 tabs.

Stupka, R.C.

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

plastic-like products. A similar material can also be made from lignin produced in biorefineries. The paper, titled "Turning renewable resources into value-added polymer:...

58

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Confinement Ventilation Systems) with the following titles: 1) BC Off-Gas Exhaust Standby Fan Autostart, 2) E-Wing Supply and Exhaust Interlocks, 3) BC Tertiary Exhaust...

59

--No Title--  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ventilation Systems) with the following titles: 1) BC Off-Gas Exhaust Standby Fan Autostart, 2) E-Wing Supply and Exhaust Interlocks, 3) BC Tertiary Exhaust Interlocks...

60

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

research thesis titled "Linking Supercomputing and Systems Biology for Efficient Bioethanol Production." The students -- Scott Horton, Scott Molony and Steven Arcangeli -- were...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

FINAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES ELECTRIC DRIVE VEHICLE BATTERY AND COMPONENT MANUFACTURING INITIATIVE APPLICATION, BRISTOL, TN, AND COLUMBUS, GA U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory March 2010 DOE/EA-1712 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES ELECTRIC DRIVE VEHICLE BATTERY AND COMPONENT MANUFACTURING INITIATIVE APPLICATION, BRISTOL, TN, AND COLUMBUS, GA U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory March 2010 DOE/EA-1712 iii COVER SHEET Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Environmental Assessment for Exide Technologies Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Bristol, TN, and Columbus, GA

62

Hanford wells  

SciTech Connect

The Site Characterization and Assessment Section of the Geosciences Department at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) has compiled a list of wells located on or near the Hanford Site. Information has been updated on wells existing from the days before construction of the Hanford Works to the present. This work was funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE). The list of wells will be used by DOE contractors who need condensed, tabular information on well location, construction, and completion dates. This report does not include data on lithologic logs and ground-water contamination. Moreover, the completeness of this list is limited because of new well construction and existing well modifications, which are continually under way. Despite these limitations, this list represents the most complete description possible of data pertaining to wells on or adjacent to the Hanford Site. 7 refs., 1 fig., 2 tabs.

McGhan, V.L.

1989-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

TITLE BLOCK  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL FATS AND OILS METHOD NUMBER: Joint AOCS/JOCS Official Method Cd 28-10 APPROVAL: Official Method with full collaborative data TITLE: Glycidyl Fatty Acid Esters in Edible Oils DEFINITION: This meth

64

Hanford recycling  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper is a study of the past and present recycling efforts on the Hanford site and options for future improvements in the recycling program. Until 1996, recycling goals were voluntarily set by the waste generators: this year, DOE has imposed goals for all its sites to accomplish by 1999. Hanford is presently meeting the voluntary site goals, but may not be able to meet all the new DOE goals without changes to the program. Most of these new DOE goals are recycling goals: * Reduce the generation of radioactive (low-level) waste from routine operations 50 percent through source reduction and recycling. * Reduce the generation of low-level mixed waste from routine operations 50 percent through source reduction and recycling. * Reduce the generation of hazardous waste from routine operations 50 percent through source reduction and recycling. * Recycle 33 percent of the sanitary waste from all operations. * Increase affirmative procurement of EPA-designated recycled items to 100 percent. The Hanford recycling program has made great strides-there has been a 98 percent increase in the amount of paper recycled since its inception in 1990. Hanford recycles paper, chemicals cardboard, tires, oil, batteries, rags, lead weights, fluorescent tubes, aerosol products, concrete, office furniture, computer software, drums, toner cartridges, and scrap metal. Many other items are recycled or reused by individual groups on a one time basis without a formal contract. Several contracts are closed-loop contracts which involve all parts of the recycle loop. Considerable savings are generated from recycling, and much more is possible with increased attention and improvements to this program. General methods for improving the recycling program to ensure that the new goals can be met are: a Contract and financial changes 0 Tracking database and methods improvements 0 Expanded recycling efforts. Specifically, the Hanford recycling program would be improved by: 0 Establishing one overall DOE recycling contract at the Hanford site and a central group to control the contract. 0 Using a BOA or MTS contract as a way to get proceeds from recycling back to site facilities to provide incentives for recycling. . Upgrading tracking mechanisms to track and recycle construction waste which is presently buried in onsite pits. . Establishing contract performance measures which hold each project accountable for specific waste reduction goals. * Recycling and reusing any material or equipment possible as buildings are dismantled.

Leonard, I.M.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

Fluor Hanford Project Focused Progress at Hanford  

SciTech Connect

Fluor Hanford is making significant progress in accelerating cleanup at the Hanford site. This progress consistently aligns with a new strategic vision established by the U.S. Department of Energy's Richland Operations Office (RL).

HANSON, R.D.

2000-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title: DEVELOPING A Title: DEVELOPING A COMPREHENSIVE RISK ASSESMENT FRAMEWORK FOR GEOLOGICAL STORAGE OF CO2 Ian Duncan University of Texas U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Infrastructure for CCS August 20-22, 2013 2 Presentation Outline 1. Benefit to the Program 2. Goals and Objectives 3. Technical Status Project 4. Accomplishments to Date 5. Summary 3 Benefit to the Program The research project is developing a comprehensive understanding of the programmatic (business), and technical risks associated with CCS particularly the likelihood of leakage and its potential consequences. This contributes to the Carbon Storage Program's effort of ensuring 99 percent CO

67

Project title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project title: Roseville Elverta (RSC-ELV) OPGW Replacement Project Project title: Roseville Elverta (RSC-ELV) OPGW Replacement Project Requested By: David Young Mail Code : N1410 Phone: 916-353-4542 Date Submitted: 5/4/2011 Date Required: 5/7/2011 Description of the Project: Purpose and Need The Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Region (SNR), is responsible for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of federally owned and operated transmission lines, Switchyards, and facilities throughout California. Western and Reclamation must comply with the National Electric Safety Code, Western States Coordinating Council (WECC), and internal directives for protecting human safety, the physical environment, and maintaining the reliable operation of the transmission system. There is an existing OPGW communications fiber on the transmission towers between Roseville and Elverta

68

List of currently classified documents relative to Hanford Production Facilities Operations originated on the Hanford Site between 1961 and 1972  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has declared that all Hanford plutonium production- and operations-related information generated between 1944 and 1972 is declassified. Any documents found and deemed useful for meeting Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) objectives may be declassified with or without deletions in accordance with DOE guidance by Authorized Derivative Declassifiers. The September 1992, letter report, Declassifications Requested by the Technical Steering Panel of Hanford Documents Produced 1944--1960, (PNWD-2024 HEDR UC-707), provides an important milestone toward achieving a complete listing of documents that may be useful to the HEDR Project. The attached listing of approximately 7,000 currently classified Hanford-originated documents relative to Hanford Production Facilities Operations between 1961 and 1972 fulfills TSP Directive 89-3. This list does not include such titles as the Irradiation Processing Department, Chemical Processing Department, and Hanford Laboratory Operations monthly reports generated after 1960 which have been previously declassified with minor deletions and made publicly available. Also Kaiser Engineers Hanford (KEH) Document Control determined that no KEH documents generated between January 1, 1961 and December 31, 1972 are currently classified. Titles which address work for others have not been included because Hanford Site contractors currently having custodial responsibility for these documents do not have the authority to determine whether other than their own staff have on file an appropriate need-to-know. Furthermore, these documents do not normally contain information relative to Hanford Site operations.

Not Available

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

Hanford Site sustainable development initiatives  

SciTech Connect

Since the days of the Manhattan Project of World War II, the economic well being of the Tri-Cities (Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland) of Washington State has been tied to the US Department of Energy missions at the nearby Hanford Site. As missions at the Site changed, so did the economic vitality of the region. The Hanford Site is now poised to complete its final mission, that of environmental restoration. When restoration is completed, the Site may be closed and the effect on the local economy will be devastating if action is not taken now. To that end, economic diversification and transition are being planned. To facilitate the process, the Hanford Site will become a sustainable development demonstration project.

Sullivan, C.T.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

THE TITLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. I understand that my thesis will be electronically available to the public. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the authors written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged.

Noah Body; D. Odaprof; A. External

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

THE TITLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. I understand that my thesis will be electronically available to the public. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the authors written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged. Signature of Author

Noah Body; D. Odaprof; A. External

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

THE TITLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DEGREE: M.C.Sc. CONVOCATION: May YEAR: 2011 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the authors written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing) and that all such use is clearly acknowledged.

Noah Body; D. Prof; D. Odaprof; A. External

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

technique of cross-validation to avoid over-fitting the data. Finally, I shall present our results, using current Lyman-alpha data from SDSS, and our forecasts for BOSS data...

74

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Final Technical Report to the Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Lab Interagency Agreement, Task DE-AT26-97FT34343 September 8, 1997- April 30, 2005 By Deborah R....

75

--No Title--  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tuesday, October 3, 2006 Energy Secretary Bodman and Minister of Natural Resources for Canada Lunn Release the 2003 Power Outage Final Report WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Department of...

76

PROJECT TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baltimore Baltimore PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - GHG Scrubbing System Page 1 of2 STATE: MD Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-EE0000738 GFO-0000738-002 0 Based all my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: All Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

77

THE TITLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DEGREE: M.C.Sc. CONVOCATION: May YEAR: 2007 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. Signature of Author The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the authors written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing) and that all such use is clearly acknowledged. iii Table of Contents Abstract......................................

Noah Body; D. Prof; D. Odaprof; A. External

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

THE TITLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DEGREE: M.C.Sc. CONVOCATION: May YEAR: 2007 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. Signature of Author The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the authors written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing) and that all such use is clearly acknowledged. iii Table of Contents List of Tables................................... Abstract......................................

Noah Body; D. Prof; D. Odaprof; A. External

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

PROJECT TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richmond Richmond PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - Solar Compactors and Recycling Units Page 1 of2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-0000013 Procurement Instrument Number DE-EE0000878 NEPA Control Number cm Number GFO-0000878-003 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

80

Hanford Site lighting occupancy sensor study  

SciTech Connect

This study was designed to assess the potential energy savings from the use of lighting occupancy sensor control in the US Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site office facilities. The final results of the study provide useful information for assessing cost-effective use of occupancy sensor lighting control. The results also include specific application data for Hanford Site office building spaces that indicate where sensor technology could be applied for cost-effective energy savings.

Richman, E.E.; Dittmer, A.L.; Keller, J.M.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Help - Title Search  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Data Fields - Title (Adavanced Search) The title field contains the words in the publication title. The system will search for the words (either singular or plurals) within the...

82

Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations...

83

Hanford System Overview  

CHG0612-16.0 CH2M-32399-VA Hanford System Overview Hanford System Overview January 23-24, 2007 Paul Certa Tom Crawford Aluminum and Chromium Leaching for

84

FINAL PROJECT REPORT: A Geophysical Characterization & Monitoring Strategy for Determining Hydrologic Processes in the Hyporheic Corridor at the Hanford 300-Area  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The primary objective of this research was to advance the prediction of solute transport between the Uranium contaminated Hanford aquifer and the Columbia River at the Hanford 300 Area by improving understanding of how fluctuations in river stage, combined with subsurface heterogeneity, impart spatiotemporal complexity to solute exchange along the Columbia River corridor. Our work explored the use of continuous waterborne electrical imaging (CWEI), in conjunction with fiber-optic distributed temperature sensor (FO-DTS) and time-lapse resistivity monitoring, to improve the conceptual model for how groundwater/surface water exchange regulates uranium transport. We also investigated how resistivity and induced polarization can be used to generate spatially rich estimates of the variation in depth to the Hanford-Ringold (H-R) contact between the river and the 300 Area Integrated Field Research Challenge (IFRC) site. Inversion of the CWEI datasets (a data rich survey containing ~60,000 measurements) provided predictions of the distributions of electrical resistivity and polarizability, from which the spatial complexity of the primary hydrogeologic units along the river corridor was reconstructed. Variation in the depth to the interface between the overlying coarse-grained, high permeability Hanford Formation and the underlying finer-grained, less permeable Ringold Formation, an important contact that limits vertical migration of contaminants, has been resolved along ~3 km of the river corridor centered on the IFRC site in the Hanford 300 Area. Spatial variability in the thickness of the Hanford Formation captured in the CWEI datasets indicates that previous studies based on borehole projections and drive-point and multi-level sampling likely overestimate the contributing area for uranium exchange within the Columbia River at the Hanford 300 Area. Resistivity and induced polarization imaging between the river and the 300 Area IFRC further imaged spatial variability in the depth to the Hanford-Ringold inland over a critical region where borehole information is absent, identifying evidence for a continuous depression in the H-R contact between the IFRC and the river corridor. Strong natural contrasts in temperature and specific conductance of river water compared to groundwater at this site, along with periodic river stage fluctuations driven by dam operations, were exploited to yield new insights into the dynamics of groundwater-surface water interaction. Whereas FO-DTS datasets have provided meter-scale measurements of focused groundwater discharge at the riverbed along the corridor, continuous resistivity monitoring has non-invasively imaged spatiotemporal variation in the resistivity inland driven by river stage fluctuations. Time series and time-frequency analysis of FO-DTS and 3D resistivity datasets has provided insights into the role of forcing variables, primarily daily dam operations, in regulating the occurrence of focused exchange at the riverbed and its extension inland. High amplitudes in the DTS and 3D resistivity signals for long periods that dominate the stage time series identify regions along the corridor where stage-driven exchange is preferentially focused. Our work has demonstrated how time-series analysis of both time-lapse resistivity and DTS datasets, in conjunction with resistivity/IP imaging of lithology, can improve understanding of groundwater-surface water exchange along river corridors, offering unique opportunities to connect stage-driven groundwater discharge observed with DTS on the riverbed to stage-driven groundwater and solute fluctuations captured with resistivity inland.

Lee Slater

2011-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

85

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Region Region DE-FE0001812 Brian J. McPherson University of Utah U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Infrastructure for CCS August 20-22, 2013 2 Acknowledgements * NETL * Shell * Tri-State * Trapper Mining * State of Colorado 3 Presentation Outline * Program Benefits * Project / Program Goals * Technical Status: Finalizing 10-Point Protocol for CO 2 Storage Site Characterization * Key Accomplishments * Summary 4 Presentation Outline * Program Benefits * Project / Program Goals * Technical Status: Finalizing 10-Point Protocol for CO 2 Storage Site Characterization * Key Accomplishments * Summary 5 Benefit to the Program Program Goals Being Addressed by this Project

86

Report Title: Mapping  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title: Title: Mapping of Reservoir Properties and Facies Through Integration of Static and Dynamic Data Report Type: Final Technical Report Reporting Period Start Date: October 1, 2000 Reporting Period End Date: September 30, 2004 Principal Authors: Albert C. Reynolds, Dean S. Oliver, Yannong Dong, Ning Liu, Guohua Gao, Fengjun Zhang & Ruijian Li Date Report Issued: December 2004 DOE Award Number: DE-FC26-00BC15309 Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Tulsa 600 South College Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product,

87

unknown title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

issue was published. See our lead story about changes in our publication schedule, necessitated by our other activities, primarily the CCC2 conference. This is the first MRB issue of 2008. ? The cover is a schematic of the fission theory for formation of planets and major moons. The left column is the sequence of events viewed in-plane, and the right column is the same sequence viewed from above. ? This is your final opportunity to sign-up for our international Crisis in Cosmology 2 (CCC2) conference from 2008 September 7-11 in Port Angeles, WA. Both participant and observer spaces remain available as of this writing, but may not remain so for very long. See

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

Hanford External Dosimetry Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the Hanford External Dosimetry Program as it is administered by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) in support of the US Department of Energy (DOE) and its Hanford contractors. Program services include administrating the Hanford personnel dosimeter processing program and ensuring that the related dosimeter data accurately reflect occupational dose received by Hanford personnel or visitors. Specific chapters of this report deal with the following subjects: personnel dosimetry organizations at Hanford and the associated DOE and contractor exposure guidelines; types, characteristics, and procurement of personnel dosimeters used at Hanford; personnel dosimeter identification, acceptance testing, accountability, and exchange; dosimeter processing and data recording practices; standard sources, calibration factors, and calibration processes (including algorithms) used for calibrating Hanford personnel dosimeters; system operating parameters required for assurance of dosimeter processing quality control; special dose evaluation methods applied for individuals under abnormal circumstances (i.e., lost results, etc.); and methods for evaluating personnel doses from nuclear accidents. 1 ref., 14 figs., 5 tabs.

Fix, J.J.

1990-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

FLUOR HANFORD DECOMMISSIONING UPDATE  

SciTech Connect

Fluor Hanford is completing D&D of the K East Basin at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State this spring, with demolition expected to begin in June. Located about 400 yards from the Columbia River, the K East Basin is one of two indoor pools that formerly contained irradiated nuclear fuel, radioactive sludge and tons of contaminated debris. In unique and path-breaking work, workers finished removing the spent fuel from the K Basins in 2004. In May 2007, workers completed vacuuming the sludge into containers in the K East Basin, and transferring it into containers in the K West Basin. In December, they finished vacuuming the remainder of K West Basin sludge into these containers. The K East Basin was emptied of its radioactive inventory first because it was more contaminated than the K West Basin, and had leaked in the past. In October 2007, Fluor Hanford began physical D&D of the 8,400-square foot K East Basin by pouring approximately 14-inches of grout into the bottom of it. Grout is a type of special cement used for encasing waste. Two months later, Fluor Hanford workers completed sluicing contaminated sand from the large filter that had sieved contaminants from the basin water for more than 50 years. Next, they poured grout into the filter housing and the vault that surrounds the filter, as well as into ion exchange columns that also helped filter basin water. For a six-week period in February and March, personnel drained the approximately one million gallons of contaminated water from the K East Basin. The effort required more than 200 tanker truck loads that transported the water to an effluent treatment facility for treatment and then release. A thin fixative was also applied to the basin walls as the water was removed to hold residual contamination in place. As soon as the water was out of the basin, Fluor pumped in approximately 18 feet of 'controlled density fill' material (somewhat similar to sand) to shield workers to a safe level from the residual radioactivity. Workers then continued preparations for demolishing the structure. Currently, they are isolating utilities, removing asbestos, draining oils, and removing other items not allowed to be disposed in Hanford's Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF). The basin's superstructure will be demolished using a heavy industrial excavator equipped with a shear. This portion of the work is expected to be completed in September, with removal of the basin substructure to follow in 2009. D&D of the K East Basin eliminated the final major radioactive sources there, and made the Columbia River and the adjacent environment safer for everyone who lives downstream.

GERBER MS

2008-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

90

Hanford | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Hanford Hanford Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant | December 2009 Aerial View Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant | December 2009 Aerial View The Hanford Site mission focuses on environmental restoration, waste management, related scientific and environmental research and development of radioactive waste management technologies. Under the Tri-Party Agreement, lower-level hazardous wastes are buried in huge lined pits that will be sealed and monitored with sophisticated instruments for many years. Enforcement September 13, 2012 Enforcement Letter,CH2M HILL Plateau - NEL-2012-02 Issued to CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company related to Radiological Work Control Deficiencies at the Plutonium Finishing Plant and 105 K-East

91

RADIOACTIVE DEMONSTRATION OF FINAL MINERALIZED WASTE FORMS FOR HANFORD WASTE TREATMENT PLANT SECONDARY WASTE BY FLUIDIZED BED STEAM REFORMING USING THE BENCH SCALE REFORMER PLATFORM  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of River Protection (ORP) is responsible for the retrieval, treatment, immobilization, and disposal of Hanford's tank waste. Currently there are approximately 56 million gallons of highly radioactive mixed wastes awaiting treatment. A key aspect of the River Protection Project (RPP) cleanup mission is to construct and operate the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The WTP will separate the tank waste into high-level and low-activity waste (LAW) fractions, both of which will subsequently be vitrified. The projected throughput capacity of the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility is insufficient to complete the RPP mission in the time frame required by the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, also known as the Tri-Party Agreement (TPA), i.e. December 31, 2047. Therefore, Supplemental Treatment is required both to meet the TPA treatment requirements as well as to more cost effectively complete the tank waste treatment mission. In addition, the WTP LAW vitrification facility off-gas condensate known as WTP Secondary Waste (WTP-SW) will be generated and enriched in volatile components such as {sup 137}Cs, {sup 129}I, {sup 99}Tc, Cl, F, and SO{sub 4} that volatilize at the vitrification temperature of 1150 C in the absence of a continuous cold cap (that could minimize volatilization). The current waste disposal path for the WTP-SW is to process it through the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (FBSR) is being considered for immobilization of the ETF concentrate that would be generated by processing the WTP-SW. The focus of this current report is the WTP-SW. FBSR offers a moderate temperature (700-750 C) continuous method by which WTP-SW wastes can be processed irrespective of whether they contain organics, nitrates, sulfates/sulfides, chlorides, fluorides, volatile radionuclides or other aqueous components. The FBSR technology can process these wastes into a crystalline ceramic (mineral) waste form. The mineral waste form that is produced by co-processing waste with kaolin clay in an FBSR process has been shown to be as durable as LAW glass. Monolithing of the granular FBSR product is being investigated to prevent dispersion during transport or burial/storage, but is not necessary for performance. A Benchscale Steam Reformer (BSR) was designed and constructed at the SRNL to treat actual radioactive wastes to confirm the findings of the non-radioactive FBSR pilot scale tests and to qualify the waste form for applications at Hanford. BSR testing with WTP SW waste surrogates and associated analytical analyses and tests of granular products (GP) and monoliths began in the Fall of 2009, and then was continued from the Fall of 2010 through the Spring of 2011. Radioactive testing commenced in 2010 with a demonstration of Hanford's WTP-SW where Savannah River Site (SRS) High Level Waste (HLW) secondary waste from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) was shimmed with a mixture of {sup 125/129}I and {sup 99}Tc to chemically resemble WTP-SW. Prior to these radioactive feed tests, non-radioactive simulants were also processed. Ninety six grams of radioactive granular product were made for testing and comparison to the non-radioactive pilot scale tests. The same mineral phases were found in the radioactive and non-radioactive testing.

Crawford, C.; Burket, P.; Cozzi, A.; Daniel, W.; Jantzen, C.; Missimer, D.

2012-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

92

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Neil Brosee President Washington Closure Hanford, LLC 2620 Fermi Avenue Richland, Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This...

93

EA-0429: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment EA-0429: Final Environmental Assessment Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington This environmental...

94

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coordinator Presentation Identifier (Title or Location), Month 00, 2008 Turbine Thermal Management 2 Materials Development NETL, CFI, WPC, UPitt * Low Cost Bond Coat Systems...

95

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Chris Guenther, Director, Computational Science Division Presentation Identifier (Title or Location), Month 00, 2008 SBEUC Simulation Based Engineering User Center 2 Agenda * A...

96

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Simulation-Based Engineering David C. Miller, Ph.D. Technical Team Lead, Carbon Capture Simulation Initiative National Energy Technology Laboratory Title, Date Kinetic and...

97

Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External Flowsheet Review Team (Technical) Report Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External Flowsheet Review Team (Technical) Report Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External Flowsheet Review Team (Technical) Report Summary - Flowsheet for the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant More Documents & Publications Waste Treatment and Immobilation Plant HLW Waste Vitrification Facility

98

WASTE LOADING ENHANCEMENTS FOR HANFORD LAW GLASSES VLS-10R1790-1 FINAL REPORT REV 0 12/1/2010  

SciTech Connect

About 50 million gallons of high-level mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at The United States Department of Energy's (DOE's) Hanford site in the State of Washington. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOE's Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed in an engineered facility on the Hanford site while the IHLW product will likely be directed to a national deep geological disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements with respect to protection of the environment before they can be accepted for disposal. The Office of River Protection is currently examining options to optimize the Low Activity Waste (LAW) Facility and LAW glass waste form. One option under evaluation is to enhance the waste processing rate of the vitrification plant currently under construction. It is likely that the capacity of the LAW vitrification plant can be increased incrementally by implementation of a variety of low-risk, high-probability changes, either separately or in combination. These changes include: (1) Operating at the higher processing rates demonstrated at the LAW pilot melter; (2) Increasing the glass pool surface area within the existing external melter envelope; (3) Increasing the glass waste loading; and (4) Operating the melter at a slightly higher temperature. The Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) of The Catholic University of America (CUA) and Energy Solutions, Inc. have evaluated several of these potential incremental improvements for ORP in support of its evaluation of WTP LAW facility optimization. Some of these incremental improvements have been tested at VSL including increasing the waste loading, increasing the processing temperature, and increasing the fraction of the sulfur in the feed that is partitioned to the off-gas (in the event that a decision is made to break the present WTP recycle loop). These approaches successfully demonstrated increases in glass production rates and significant increases in sulfate incorporation at the nominal melter operating temperature of 1150 C and at slightly higher than nominal glass processing temperatures. Subsequent tests demonstrated further enhancement of glass formulations for all of the LAW waste envelopes, thereby reducing the amount of glass to be produced by the WTP for the same amount of waste processed. The next phase of testing determined the applicability of these improvements over the expected range of sodium and sulfur concentrations for Hanford LAW. This approach was subsequently applied to an even wider range of LAW wastes types, including those with high potassium concentration. The feasibility of formulating higher waste loading glasses using SnO{sub 2} and V{sub 2}O{sub 5} in place of Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} and TiO{sub 2} as glass former additives was also evaluated. The present report provides data from investigation of the effects of magnesium content (up to {approx}10 wt%) on LAW glass properties and from work to identify improved high waste loading glass formulations that meets all processing and product quality requirements for two waste compositions. The scope of testing is detailed in the Test Plan for this work. A glass composition previously developed and tested at VSL for LAW from tank AN-105 (LAWA187) was varied by substituting Mg for other glass former additives such as Ca, B and Si in an attempt to formulate a glass with improved properties, such as higher waste loading and greater sulfur tolerance. The results were used to reformulate another glass (ORPLG9) developed for LAW from tank AP-101 that contains high concentrations of alkalis (Na and K). Glass formulation goals for this waste were to increase the sulfur tolerance of the

KRUGER AA; MULLER IS; JOSEPH I; MATLACK KS; GAN H; PEGG IL

2010-12-28T23:59:59.000Z

99

WASTE LOADING ENHANCEMENTS FOR HANFORD LAW GLASSES VLS-10R1790-1 FINAL REPORT REV 0 12/1/2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

About 50 million gallons of high-level mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at The United States Department of Energy's (DOE's) Hanford site in the State of Washington. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOE's Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed in an engineered facility on the Hanford site while the IHLW product will likely be directed to a national deep geological disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements with respect to protection of the environment before they can be accepted for disposal. The Office of River Protection is currently examining options to optimize the Low Activity Waste (LAW) Facility and LAW glass waste form. One option under evaluation is to enhance the waste processing rate of the vitrification plant currently under construction. It is likely that the capacity of the LAW vitrification plant can be increased incrementally by implementation of a variety of low-risk, high-probability changes, either separately or in combination. These changes include: (1) Operating at the higher processing rates demonstrated at the LAW pilot melter; (2) Increasing the glass pool surface area within the existing external melter envelope; (3) Increasing the glass waste loading; and (4) Operating the melter at a slightly higher temperature. The Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) of The Catholic University of America (CUA) and Energy Solutions, Inc. have evaluated several of these potential incremental improvements for ORP in support of its evaluation of WTP LAW facility optimization. Some of these incremental improvements have been tested at VSL including increasing the waste loading, increasing the processing temperature, and increasing the fraction of the sulfur in the feed that is partitioned to the off-gas (in the event that a decision is made to break the present WTP recycle loop). These approaches successfully demonstrated increases in glass production rates and significant increases in sulfate incorporation at the nominal melter operating temperature of 1150 C and at slightly higher than nominal glass processing temperatures. Subsequent tests demonstrated further enhancement of glass formulations for all of the LAW waste envelopes, thereby reducing the amount of glass to be produced by the WTP for the same amount of waste processed. The next phase of testing determined the applicability of these improvements over the expected range of sodium and sulfur concentrations for Hanford LAW. This approach was subsequently applied to an even wider range of LAW wastes types, including those with high potassium concentration. The feasibility of formulating higher waste loading glasses using SnO{sub 2} and V{sub 2}O{sub 5} in place of Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} and TiO{sub 2} as glass former additives was also evaluated. The present report provides data from investigation of the effects of magnesium content (up to {approx}10 wt%) on LAW glass properties and from work to identify improved high waste loading glass formulations that meets all processing and product quality requirements for two waste compositions. The scope of testing is detailed in the Test Plan for this work. A glass composition previously developed and tested at VSL for LAW from tank AN-105 (LAWA187) was varied by substituting Mg for other glass former additives such as Ca, B and Si in an attempt to formulate a glass with improved properties, such as higher waste loading and greater sulfur tolerance. The results were used to reformulate another glass (ORPLG9) developed for LAW from tank AP-101 that contains high concentrations of alkalis (Na and K). Glass formulation goals for this waste were to increase the sulfur tolerance of the

KRUGER AA; MULLER IS; JOSEPH I; MATLACK KS; GAN H; PEGG IL

2010-12-28T23:59:59.000Z

100

Summary of the HANFORD SITE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

will be welded. Some Tri-Party Agreement milestones completed in 2002 were related to work on Hanford tanks. #12 paragraphs. Solid waste may originate from work on the Hanford Site or from sources offsite, with contributions from CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc.; S.M. Stoller Corporation; Fluor Hanford, Inc. and its

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

The Hanford summit and sustainable development  

SciTech Connect

Since the days of the Manhattan Project of World War II, the economic well being of the Tri-Cities (Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland) of Washington State has been tied to the US Department of Energy missions at the nearby Hanford Site. As missions at the Site changed, so did the well being of the region. The Hanford Site is now poised to complete its final mission, that of environmental restoration. When restoration is compiled, the Site may be closed and the effect on the local economy will be devastating if action is not taken now. To that end, economic diversification and transition are being planned. To facilitate the process, the Hanford Site will become a sustainable development demonstration project -- a project with regional, national, and international application.

Sullivan, C.T.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Hanford Needs Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Needs Assessment Hanford Needs Assessment July 1997 This Needs Assessment for former Hanford construction workers was developed for the purpose of collecting existing...

103

Massive Hanford Test Reactor Removed- Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor removed from Hanfords 300 Area  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, WA Hanfords River Corridor contractor, Washington Closure Hanford, has met a significant cleanup challenge on the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Hanford Site by removing a 1,082-ton nuclear test reactor from the 300 Area.

104

Hanford Site Development Plan  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Site Development Plan (Site Development Plan) is intended to guide the short- and long-range development and use of the Hanford Site. All acquisition, development, and permanent facility use at the Hanford Site will conform to the approved plan. The Site Development Plan also serves as the base document for all subsequent studies that involve use of facilities at the Site. This revision is an update of a previous plan. The executive summary presents the highlights of the five major topics covered in the Site Development Plan: general site information, existing conditions, planning analysis, Master Plan, and Five-Year Plan. 56 refs., 67 figs., 31 tabs.

Rinne, C.A.; Curry, R.H.; Hagan, J.W.; Seiler, S.W.; Sommer, D.J. (Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (USA)); Yancey, E.F. (Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA))

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant technical manual  

SciTech Connect

A key element of the Hanford waste management strategy is the construction of a new facility, the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP), to vitrify existing and future liquid high-level waste produced by defense activities at the Hanford Site. The HWVP mission is to vitrify pretreated waste in borosilicate glass, cast the glass into stainless steel canisters, and store the canisters at the Hanford Site until they are shipped to a federal geological repository. The HWVP Technical Manual (Manual) documents the technical bases of the current HWVP process and provides a physical description of the related equipment and the plant. The immediate purpose of the document is to provide the technical bases for preparation of project baseline documents that will be used to direct the Title 1 and Title 2 design by the A/E, Fluor. The content of the Manual is organized in the following manner. Chapter 1.0 contains the background and context within which the HWVP was designed. Chapter 2.0 describes the site, plant, equipment and supporting services and provides the context for application of the process information in the Manual. Chapter 3.0 provides plant feed and product requirements, which are primary process bases for plant operation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes the technology for each plant process. Chapter 5.0 describes the engineering principles for designing major types of HWVP equipment. Chapter 6.0 describes the general safety aspects of the plant and process to assist in safe and prudent facility operation. Chapter 7.0 includes a description of the waste form qualification program and data. Chapter 8.0 indicates the current status of quality assurance requirements for the Manual. The Appendices provide data that are too extensive to be placed in the main text, such as extensive tables and sets of figures. The Manual is a revision of the 1987 version.

Larson, D.E. [ed.; Watrous, R.A.; Kruger, O.L. [and others

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Available Publications - By Title  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Impact of Natural Ventilation Strategies and Design Issues for California Applications, Including Input to ASHRAE Standard 62 and California Title ...

107

Hanford ETR - Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - - Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - Estimate at Completion (Cost) Report Hanford ETR - Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - Estimate at Completion (Cost) Report This is a comprehensive review ofthe Hanford WTP estimate at completion - assessing the project scope, contract requirements, management execution plant, schedule, cost estimates, and risks. Hanford ETR - Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - Estimate at Completion (Cost) Report More Documents & Publications TBH-0042 - In the Matter of Curtis Hall

108

Hanford Emergency Response Plan  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Emergency Response Plan for the US Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL), incorporates into one document an overview of the emergency management program for the Hanford Site. The program has been developed in accordance with DOE orders, and state and federal regulations to protect worker and public health and safety and the environment in the event of an emergency at or affecting the Hanford Site. This plan provides a description of how the Hanford Site will implement the provisions of DOE 5500 series and other applicable Orders in terms of overall policies and concept of operations. It should be used as the basis, along with DOE Orders, for the development of specific contractor and RL implementing procedures.

Wagoner, J.D.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Historical Photographs: Hanford Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Small Image 1. A facility at Hanford for treating persons injured by embedded radioactive particles (circa 1967). In this shielded operating cell, a mock patient is flanked by a...

110

EA-1111: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1111: Final Environmental Assessment K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the...

111

EA-1728: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1728: Final Environmental Assessment Final Environmental Assessment for Integrated Vegetation Management of the Hanford Site, Richland, WA This EA evaluates the...

112

EIS-0325: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0325: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Schultz-Hanford Transmission...

113

EIS-0391: EPA Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPA Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0391: EPA Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Tank Closure and Waste...

114

EA-1189: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Assessment EA-1189: Final Environmental Assessment Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed Waste This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for...

115

EA-0978: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Final Environmental Assessment EA-0978: Final Environmental Assessment Sludge Stabilization at the Plutonium Finishing Plant, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington This EA...

116

EA-1682: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1682: Final Environmental Assessment Upgrades and Life Extension of the 242-A Evaporator, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington This EA evaluates...

117

Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office...

118

Manhattan Project: Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex at Hanford, 1945 HANFORD BECOMES OPERATIONAL F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex at Hanford, 1945 HANFORD BECOMES OPERATIONAL (Hanford Engineer Works, 1943-1944) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 The plutonium production facilities at the Hanford Engineer Works took shape with the same wartime urgency as did the uranium facilities at Oak Ridge. In February 1943, Colonel Matthias returned to the location he had helped select the previous December and set up a temporary headquarters. In late March, Matthias received his assignment. The three water-cooled production reactor (piles), designated by the letters B, D, and F, would be built about six miles apart on the south bank of the Columbia River. The four chemical separation plants would be built in pairs at two sites nearly ten miles south of the piles. A facility to produce slugs and perform tests would be approximately twenty miles southeast of the separation plants near Richland. Temporary quarters for construction workers would be put up at the Hanford town site, while permanent facilities for other personnel would be located down the road in Richland, safely removed from the production and separation plants. Life at Hanford would soon come to resemble that of the other "atomic boomtowns" of the Manhattan Project, Los Alamos and Oak Ridge.

119

RCRA facility investigation/corrective measures study work plan for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 200-UP-2 Operable Unit is one of two source operable units at the U Plant Aggregate Area at the Hanford Site. Source operable units include waste management units and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of radioactive and/or hazardous substance contamination. This work plan, while maintaining the title RFI/CMS, presents the background and direction for conducting a limited field investigation in the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit, which is the first part of the process leading to final remedy selection. This report discusses the background, prior recommendations, goals, organization, and quality assurance for the 200-UP-2 Operable Unit Work Plan. The discussion begins with a summary of the regulatory framework and the role of the work plan. The specific recommendations leading into the work plan are then addressed. Next, the goals and organization of the report are discussed. Finally, the quality assurance and supporting documentation are presented.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Status Update: EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J Section 999 - Project NT42677, "Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Program Roy Long Technology Manager, EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999 2 UDAC Update Presentation Outline * Consortium Accomplishments * UDW Program RFP Summary - 2007 - 2008 * 2009 Funding Disbursement History * 2009 Program / Process Enhancements - Contractual / GAO - Risk Mitigation / Management 3 Overall: * 3 Annual Plans completed * 15 solicitations released under 2007 R&D funding * 43 projects selected for award under 2007 solicitations - 17 Ultra-Deepwater projects - 19 Unconventional Resources projects - 7 Small Producers projects Program Accomplishments Solicitations & Awards 4 * Current Status:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Performance Assessment Scoping - Hanford Example  

Performance Assessment Scoping - Hanford Example Linda Suttora Office of Environmental Compliance DOE-HQ Waste Processing Technical Exchange 2010

122

Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Waste Tank Plant PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford...

123

Summary of the HANFORD SITE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

milestones completed in 2003 were related to work on Hanford waste storage tanks. During 2003, there were 36Summary of the HANFORD SITE Environmental Report for Calendar Year 2003 EDITORS R.W. HANF L Northwest National Laboratory under contract DE-AC06-76RL01830, with contributions from Bechtel Hanford, Inc

124

FINAL REPORT FOR THE DOE/ARM PROJECT TITLED Representation of the Microphysical and Radiative Properties of Ice Clouds in SCMs and GCMs  

SciTech Connect

The broad goal of this research is to improve climate prediction through better representation of cirrus cloud microphysical and radiative properties in global climate models (GCMs). Clouds still represent the greatest source of uncertainty in climate prediction, and the representation of ice clouds is considerably more challenging than liquid water clouds. While about 40% of cloud condensate may be in the form of ice by some estimates, there have been no credible means of representing the ice particle size distribution and mass removal rates from ice clouds in GCMs. Both factors introduce large uncertainties regarding the global net flux, the latter factor alone producing a change of 10 W/m2 in the global net flux due to plausible changes in effective ice particle fallspeed. In addition, the radiative properties of ice crystals themselves are in question. This research provides GCMs with a credible means of representing the full (bimodal) ice particle size distribution (PSD) in ice clouds, including estimates of the small crystal (D < 65 microns) mode of the PSD. It also provides realistic estimates of mass sedimentation rates from ice clouds, which have a strong impact on their ice contents and radiative properties. This can be done through proper analysis of ice cloud microphysical data from ARM and other field campaigns. In addition, this research tests the ice cloud radiation treatment developed under two previous ARM projects by comparing it against laboratory measurements of ice cloud extinction efficiency and by comparing it with explicit theoretical calculations of ice crystal optical properties. The outcome of this project includes two PSD schemes for ice clouds; one appropriate for mid-latitude cirrus clouds and another for tropical anvil cirrus. Cloud temperature and ice water content (IWC) are the inputs for these PSD schemes, which are based on numerous PSD observations. The temperature dependence of the small crystal mode of the PSD for tropical anvils is opposite to that of mid-latitude cirrus, and this results in very different radiative properties for these two types of cirrus at temperatures less than about 50 C for a given ice water path. In addition, the representative PSD fall velocity is strongly influenced by the small crystal mode, and for temperatures less than 52 C, this fall velocity for mid-latitude cirrus is 2-8 times greater than for tropical anvil cirrus. Finally, the treatment of ice cloud optical properties was found to agree with laboratory measurements and exact theory within 15% for any given wavelength, PSD and ice particle shape. This treatment is analytical, formulated in terms of the PSD and ice particle shape properties. It thus provides the means for explicitly coupling the ice cloud microphysical and radiative properties, and can treat any combination of ice particle shape. It is very inexpensive regarding computer time. When these three deliverables were incorporated into the GCM at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) under another project, it was found that the sunlight reflected and the amount of upwelling heat absorbed by cirrus clouds depended strongly on the PSD scheme used (i.e. mid-latitude or tropical anvil). This was largely due to the fall velocities associated with the two PSD schemes, although the PSD shape was also important.

Mitchell, David L.

2005-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

125

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 19,2010 August 19,2010 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Neil Brosee President Washington Closure Hanford, LLC 2620 Fermi Avenue Richland, Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the employee fall that occurred at the Hanford High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) on July 1, 2009. The worker sustained serious injury to his back and broke bones in both legs. Based on an evaluation of the evidence in this matter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program, by Washington Closure Hanford, LLC (WCH) occurred. Accordingly, DOE is issuing the enclosed Preliminary Notice of

126

HANFORD ENGINEER WORKS  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

HANFORD ENGINEER WORKS HANFORD ENGINEER WORKS IJd *P-t - - ~~~ssiticatiC+n cwcetted rat G.E. NUCLEONICS PROJECT xi I ~@L.%&~--G-ENERAI,@ ELECTRIC z ,m ._.__.-. _ I--..-. By Authority of. COMPANY ._ Atmic Energy Commission Office of Hanford Dire&xl Operations Riohland, Washington Attention; Mr. Carleton Shugg, Manager ./ ALPKA-ROLLED EL'GIL%I jw -879 ' . *_ a. f' Richland, Washington February 6, 1948 , Thla Dclc.Jv-

127

Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP) is being designed to immobilize pretreated Hanford high-level waste and transuranic waste in borosilicate glass contained in stainless steel canisters. Testing is being conducted in the HWVP Technology Development Project to ensure that adapted technologies are applicable to the candidate Hanford wastes and to generate information for waste form qualification. Empirical modeling is being conducted to define a glass composition range consistent with process and waste form qualification requirements. Laboratory studies are conducted to determine process stream properties, characterize the redox chemistry of the melter feed as a basis for controlling melt foaming and evaluate zeolite sorption materials for process waste treatment. Pilot-scale tests have been performed with simulated melter feed to access filtration for solids removal from process wastes, evaluate vitrification process performance and assess offgas equipment performance. Process equipment construction materials are being selected based on literature review, corrosion testing, and performance in pilot-scale testing. 3 figs., 6 tabs.

Larson, D.E.; Allen, C.R. (Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)); Kruger, O.L.; Weber, E.T. (Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States))

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Final Closeout report for grant FG36-08GO18018, titled: Functional Multi-Layer Solution Processable Polymer Solar Cells  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The original objectives were: (1) Develop a method to deposit multiple conjugated polymer film layers and avoid the problem of dissolution from mutually solubility; (2) Use this deposition method to develop multi-layer polymer based solar cells with layers that are function specific; (3) characterize these layers and devices; (4) develop electrical and optical models that describe and predict the properties of the multi-layers; and (5) Ultimate efficiency goals are {approx}6.75% with J{sub sc} = 12 mA/cm{sup 2}, FF = 0.75, and V{sub oc} = 0.75. The question of whether photovoltaic (PV) cells will ever be able to replace fossil fuels as the main provider of electrical power is not just a question of device efficiency; it is a question of how much power can be provided for what price. It has been well documented that PV devices at 10% power efficiency can provide for all of the world's power needs without covering too much of the earth's surface. Assuming desert like cloud coverage, an area equivalent to the land area of Texas would have to be covered. However, it has also been shown that using the current state-of-the-art silicon devices, the price-per-Watt will never be low enough to be economically feasible for large-scale development. Solution-processable PV devices based on polymers are a very attractive alternative to traditional Silicon PV because this technology is much lower in materials cost and in environmentally toxic waste production. Solution-based polymers can be rapidly deposited using printing technologies and are compatible with light-weight flexible substrates that can increase the range of available PV applications. In the past ten years, the efficiency of polymer based PV devices has increased from {approx}1% to over 10%. The highest efficiency organic solar cells are based upon a single layer than consists of a mixture of donor and acceptor moieties. This one layer has multiple optical and electrical functions, so the design of a single heterojunction layer is based upon the idea of balancing good and bad properties within a single film. This proposal addresses the idea that the use of multiple layers that have differing electrical and optical functions could lead to greater efficiency because fewer materials compromises must be made. This idea is not new, multiple functional layer have been successfully used in cross-linked OLED's and organic small molecule evaporated PV devices. The main reason that multiple layers of polymers are not commonly deposited is that most conjugated polymers are mutually soluble in the same solvents. The work outlined in the proposal was intended to develop a new deposition strategy that would allow multiple organic layers to be deposited from solution using spin coating. The deposition method that we proposed was successful, sometimes, but ultimately not reliable. Instead we focused on more reliable methods to implement doping along the interface between layers. This work has been very successful. We found that using PEDOT:PSS, the PSS would form a surface layer of {approx}2-3 nm thickness that would mix with and electrochemically react with P3HT upon heating. This mechanism is also a crosslinking reaction in that H{sub 2} is released and permanent new bonds are formed. Using the Plextronics Inc. replacement to PEDOT:PSS, for which there are no mobile dopants, we were able to show that a second and different mechanism can be used to p-type dope organic materials. We are currently working with Plextronics to develop a new product. Finally we produced n-type doping of a thin fullerene layer near the cathode also using a self-assembly method. Low work function metals will diffuse into the BHJ layer and dope the fullerene upon heating. This doping also affects the vertical segregation of BHJ materials in a predictable way. We accomplished all of the scientific goals that we set out in the proposal written in May 2007. Some of the methods we proposed were not fully successful, but we did come up with better methods to achieve the same goal. We did not achieve the efficiency g

Adam J. Moule

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Research Highlights Sorted by Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title Title "Invisible" Giants in the Sky ARM ASR Kassianov, E. "Radiance Assimilation" Correction Method Improves Water Vapor Radiosonde Observations in the Upper Troposphere ARM Soden, B. J. "Roobik" Is Part of the Answer, Not a Puzzle ARM Turner, D. D. 2007 Floods Not a Complete Washout in U.S. Great Plains ARM ASR Bhattacharya, A. A "Little" Respect: Droplet Nucleation Finally Included in Global Climate Model ARM Ghan, S. J. A Bulk Parameterization of Giant Cloud Condensation Nuclei ARM Kogan, Y. A Climatology of Midlatitude Continental Cloud Properties and Their Impact on the Surface Radiation Budget ARM Dong, X. A Comparison of Integrated Water Vapor Sensors: WVIOP-96 ARM Liljegren, J. C. A Consistency Analysis of ARESE Aircraft Measurements ARM

130

EIS-0391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, 391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington EIS-0391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland, Washington Summary This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts for the following three key areas: (1) retrieval, treatment, and disposal of waste from 149 single-shell tanks (SSTs) and 28 double-shell tanks and closure of the SST system, (2) decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility, a nuclear test reactor, and (3) disposal of Hanford's waste and other DOE sites' low-level and mixed low-level radioactive waste. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download December 13, 2013 EIS-0391: Record of Decision Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for

131

Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Agreement Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Agreement January 9, 2006 - 9:43am Addthis Richland, WA - U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman today announced that the Department of Energy (DOE) and the State of Washington have entered into a settlement agreement that will lead to a final order and the dismissal of the challenge to Hanford's Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in the lawsuit Washington v. Bodman. DOE, with Washington State as a cooperating agency, will prepare a new EIS that will include updated, site-wide groundwater analysis. "With this agreement, both parties will be able to shift their focus and resources away from litigation and toward partnership and our shared

132

Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Agreement Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Agreement January 9, 2006 - 9:43am Addthis Richland, WA - U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman today announced that the Department of Energy (DOE) and the State of Washington have entered into a settlement agreement that will lead to a final order and the dismissal of the challenge to Hanford's Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in the lawsuit Washington v. Bodman. DOE, with Washington State as a cooperating agency, will prepare a new EIS that will include updated, site-wide groundwater analysis. "With this agreement, both parties will be able to shift their focus and resources away from litigation and toward partnership and our shared

133

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title IX, Subtitle J (EPAct Title IX, Subtitle J (EPAct 2005) Complementary Program - Office of Research and Development September 2008 2 3 Complementary Program NETL - ORD * Areas of research - Drilling Under Extreme Conditions - Environmental Impacts of Oil and Gas - Enhanced and Unconventional Oil Recovery - Resource Assessment * Institute for Advanced Energy Solutions - West Virginia University, Carnegie-Mellon University, and University of Pittsburgh * Penn State University and Oregon State University 4 Drilling Under Extreme Conditions * Ultra-deep single cutter drilling simulator - Recreates bottom-hole drilling environment of ultra-deep wells (30,000 psi and 481 o F) - Delivered to NETL later this year - Operates with real drilling fluids - X-ray video system images cuttings - Verify the results of the full bit

134

Hanford Tank Waste Residuals  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Hanford Tank Waste Residuals DOE HLW Corporate Board November 6, 2008 Chris Kemp, DOE ORP Bill Hewitt, YAHSGS LLC Hanford Tanks & Tank Waste * Single-Shell Tanks (SSTs) - ~27 million gallons of waste* - 149 SSTs located in 12 SST Farms - Grouped into 7 Waste Management Areas (WMAs) for RCRA closure purposes: 200 West Area S/SX T TX/TY U 200 East Area A/AX B/BX/BY C * Double-Shell Tanks (DSTs) - ~26 million gallons of waste* - 28 DSTs located in 6 DST Farms (1 West/5 East) * 17 Misc Underground Storage Tanks (MUST) * 43 Inactive MUST (IMUST) 200 East Area A/AX B/BX/BY C * Volumes fluctuate as SST retrievals and 242-A Evaporator runs occur. Major Regulatory Drivers * Radioactive Tank Waste Materials - Atomic Energy Act - DOE M 435.1-1, Ch II, HLW - Other DOE Orders * Hazardous/Dangerous Tank Wastes - Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (TPA) - Retrieval/Closure under State's implementation

135

ESG-CET Final Progress Title  

SciTech Connect

Drawing to a close after five years of funding from DOE's ASCR and BER program offices, the SciDAC-2 project called the Earth System Grid (ESG) Center for Enabling Technologies has successfully established a new capability for serving data from distributed centers. The system enables users to access, analyze, and visualize data using a globally federated collection of networks, computers and software. The ESG software - now known as the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) - has attracted a broad developer base and has been widely adopted so that it is now being utilized in serving the most comprehensive multi-model climate data sets in the world. The system is used to support international climate model intercomparison activities as well as high profile U.S. DOE, NOAA, NASA, and NSF projects. It currently provides more than 25,000 users access to more than half a petabyte of climate data (from models and from observations) and has enabled over a 1,000 scientific publications.

Don Middleton

2011-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

136

No Slide Title | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EAC Plan Hanford ETR - Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - Estimate at Completion (Cost) Report...

137

Investigator Title Technology  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Principal Investigator Title Technology Sector State Funds Expended Cost Share Expended Jobs,000 1 Schanbacher, Floyd Development and Commercialization of an integrated Biomass to Electricity Funds Expended Cost Share Expended Jobs Created Average Salary Leverage: Federal $ Leverage: State

138

Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, , Final for Vegetation Control at VHF Stations, Microwave Stations, Electrical Substations, and Pole Yards . Environmental Assessment Prepared for Southwestern Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy - _ . . . " Prepared by Black & Veatch October 13,1995 ' Table of Contents 1 . 0 Purpose and Need for Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 Description of the Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 Alternative 1 . No Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 Alternative 2 . Mechanical and Manual Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 Alternative 3 . Proposed Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.1 Foliar Spray Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.2 Soil-Spot Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

139

Management of Hanford Site non-defense production reactor spent nuclear fuel, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) needs to provide radiologically, and industrially safe and cost-effective management of the non-defense production reactor spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Hanford Site. The proposed action would place the Hanford Site`s non-defense production reactor SNF in a radiologically- and industrially-safe, and passive storage condition pending final disposition. The proposed action would also reduce operational costs associated with storage of the non-defense production reactor SNF through consolidation of the SNF and through use of passive rather than active storage systems. Environmental, safety and health vulnerabilities associated with existing non-defense production reactor SNF storage facilities have been identified. DOE has determined that additional activities are required to consolidate non-defense production reactor SNF management activities at the Hanford Site, including cost-effective and safe interim storage, prior to final disposition, to enable deactivation of facilities where the SNF is now stored. Cost-effectiveness would be realized: through reduced operational costs associated with passive rather than active storage systems; removal of SNF from areas undergoing deactivation as part of the Hanford Site remediation effort; and eliminating the need to duplicate future transloading facilities at the 200 and 400 Areas. Radiologically- and industrially-safe storage would be enhanced through: (1) removal from aging facilities requiring substantial upgrades to continue safe storage; (2) utilization of passive rather than active storage systems for SNF; and (3) removal of SNF from some storage containers which have a limited remaining design life. No substantial increase in Hanford Site environmental impacts would be expected from the proposed action. Environmental impacts from postulated accident scenarios also were evaluated, and indicated that the risks associated with the proposed action would be small.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(the percentage of actual operating time). 1 Comprehensive Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Flowsheet and Throughput Specifically, the following questions were...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS Rail Alignment EIS - Chapters 1 and 2 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management June 2008 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor (DOE/EIS-0250F-S2; the Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS), and Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (DOE/EIS-0369; the Rail Alignment EIS) CONTACTS: For more information about this document, For general information on the DOE NEPA process,

142

Cover and Title Page  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

404 Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Environmental Assessment for the Actinide Chemistry and Repository Science Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Final June 2002 Final...

143

HANFORD TANK CLEANUP UPDATE  

SciTech Connect

Access to Hanford's single-shell radioactive waste storage tank C-107 was significantly improved when workers completed the cut of a 55-inch diameter hole in the top of the tank. The core and its associated cutting equipment were removed from the tank and encased in a plastic sleeve to prevent any potential spread of contamination. The larger tank opening allows use of a new more efficient robotic arm to complete tank retrieval.

BERRIOCHOA MV

2011-04-07T23:59:59.000Z

144

Hanford Achieves a Cleanup First  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

RICHLAND, Wash. DOE contractors have completed cleanup of F Area, the first reactor area at the 586-square-mile Hanford site to be fully remediated.

145

Hanford, Former Production Workers Screening Projects | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Hanford, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Project Name: National Supplemental Screening Program Covered DOE Site:...

146

Independent Activity Report, Hanford Waste Treatment Plant -...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Activity Report, Hanford Waste Treatment Plant - February 2011 February 2011 Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Construction Quality Assurance Review ARPT-WTP-2011-002...

147

HANFORD SITE CLEANUP OBJECTIVES INCONSISTENTWITH PROJECTED LAND...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HANFORD SITE CLEANUP OBJECTIVES INCONSISTENTWITH PROJECTED LAND USES, IG-0446 HANFORD SITE CLEANUP OBJECTIVES INCONSISTENTWITH PROJECTED LAND USES, IG-0446 The cleanup of the...

148

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UDAC Recommendations UDAC Recommendations Roy Long Technology Manager, EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999 2 Overview of UDAC 2009 Recommendations Recommendation Areas * R&D Program Focus * Program Scope * Process * Program Progress & Value * Societal Impact 3 R&D Program Focus Area * Safety and environmental projects should be considered as separate topics. * Safety and environmental projects should be identified with specific phases of the exploration and production lifecycle. * The project impact assessment utilized in the project selection process should be made public and available to the UDAC. * Fund projects which address the overall safety impact of UDW activity. * Fund projects which address the overall environmental impact of UDW activity. * The metocean program should be strengthened regarding wind and

149

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wellbores and Drilling Wellbores and Drilling Brian Strazisar NETL Title, Date ‹#› Technology or Capability Overview * 3 primary efforts related to wellbore cement - Risk of wellbore leakage in CO 2 storage/EOR - Stability of foamed cements in deep offshore wells - Shallow gas migration in shale gas wells * Extreme Drilling Laboratory (XDL) - NETL Facility to study drilling processes under conditions that exist at extreme depths ‹#› CO 2 and Wellbore Leakage Risk * Early NETL work defined mechanism for chemical reaction between CO 2 and wellbore cement. * Degradation of cement determined to be too slow to impact well integrity in the absence of preexisting flow paths CaCO 3(s) barrier (2) Degraded Zone (3) Propagation of Fronts Ca(OH) 2 depleted zone (1)

150

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Track 1A: Oil & Gas Production Track 1A: Oil & Gas Production and Utilization-Overview George Guthrie Office of Research and Development National Energy Technology Laboratory Title, Date ‹#› The Need: Energy portfolio is projected to remain anchored by fossil. Sources: U.S. data from EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2011; World data from IEA, World Energy Outlook 2010, Current Policies Scenario 79% Fossil Energy 78% Fossil Energy 84% Fossil Energy 81% Fossil Energy * Primarily traditional biomass, wood, and waste. Gas 24% Coal 21% Oil 33% Nuclear 8% Renewables 14% Gas 24% Coal 22% Oil 37% Nuclear 8% Renewables 8% Gas 21% Coal 27% Oil 33% Nuclear 6% Renewables* 13% Gas 22% Coal 29% Oil 28% Nuclear 8% Renewables* 15% + 14% + 47% Energy Demand 2008 Energy Demand 2035 World

151

TITLE48CHAPTER9  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TITLE 48 CHAPTER 9 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS TITLE 48 CHAPTER 9 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACQUISITION REGULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Subchapter A - General 901 - Federal Acquisition Regulations System 902 - Definitions of words and terms 903 - Improper business practices and personal conflicts of interest 904 - Administrative matters Subchapter B - Acquisition Planning 905 - Publicizing contract actions 906 - Competition requirements 908 - Required sources of supplies and services 909 - Contractor qualifications 911 - Describing Agency needs 912 - Acquisition of Commercial Items Subchapter C - Contracting Methods and Contract Types 913 - Simplified acquisition procedures 914 - Sealed bidding 915 - Contracting by negotiation 916 - Types of contracts

152

EA-1211: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1211: Final Environmental Assessment Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for...

153

EA-1210: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment EA-1210: Final Environmental Assessment Lead Test Assembly Irradiation and Analysis Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Tennessee and Hanford Site, Richland,...

154

EA-1934: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assessment EA-1934: Final Environmental Assessment Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of...

155

EIS-0119: Final Environmental Impact Statement | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0119: Final Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington...

156

Manhattan Project: DuPont and Hanford, Hanford Engineer Works, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The president of DuPont, Walter Carpenter, with Generals Levin H. Campbell, Everett Hughes, and Charles T. Harris. DUPONT AND HANFORD The president of DuPont, Walter Carpenter, with Generals Levin H. Campbell, Everett Hughes, and Charles T. Harris. DUPONT AND HANFORD (Hanford Engineer Works, 1942) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 The scientists of the Met Lab had the technical expertise to design a production pile, but construction and management on an industrial scale required an outside contractor. The DuPont Corporation was an ideal candidate, but the giant chemical firm was hesitant to join the project due to concern over accusations that it had profiteered during World War I. On October 3, 1942, DuPont agreed to design and build the chemical separation plant for the production pile facility then planned for Oak Ridge. Leslie Groves tried to entice further DuPont participation by having the firm prepare an appraisal of the pile (reactor) project and by placing three DuPont staff members on the Lewis Committee. DuPont ultimately agreed to become the primary contractor for plutonium-related work, but because of continuing sensitivity about its public image its contract called for a total payment of only dollar over actual costs. In addition, DuPont vowed to stay out of the bomb business after the war and offered all patents to the United States government.

157

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4941 (2) Revision Number: 0 (3) Effective Date: 02/25/2010 4941 (2) Revision Number: 0 (3) Effective Date: 02/25/2010 (4) Document Type: ElDigital Image [] Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DIRF) or 20 SPDF Video number of digital images (5) Release Type New El Cancel I E Page Change El Complete Revision (6) Document Title: Meeting Minutes for the WMA C PA Working Session on Soils Inventory (7) Change/Release Summary of meeting between DOE-ORP and Hanford Site regulators/stakeholders regarding Description: Waste Management Area C performance assessment on soil inventory. (8) Change N/A Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure Location: (c) Building Number: Structure, System, N/NA and Component N/NA (SSC) and Building (b) System Designator: (d) Equipment ID Number (EIN): Number: N/A N/A (10) Impacted (a) Document Type (b) Document Number (c) Document Revision

158

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM DOCUMENT RELEASE FORM ! I (1) Document Number: RPP-47375 . NUMber· 0 I (3) Effective Date: 08/11/2010 i (4) Document Type: o Digital Image o Hard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DRF) or 21 I ~PDF o Video I number of digital images (5) Release Type ~ New o Cancel o Page Change o Complete Revision i (6) Document Title: Meeting Minutes for the WMA C PA Engineered Systems #2 Working Session - Steel Corrosion; i ConcretelGrout Degradation I(7) Change/Release ..- - . Summary of meeting between DOE-ORP and Hanford Site regulators/stakeholders regarding Description: Waste Management Area C performance assessment on Engineered Systems #2 - Steel Corrosion; Concrete/Grout Degradation I(8) Change N/A Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure Location: (c) Building Number:

159

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51 35 51 35 (2) Revision Number: 0 (3) Effective Date: 03/03/2010 (4) Document Typo: [I Digital Image ElHard copy (a) Number of pages (including the DRF) or 18 JE PDF Vie number of digital Images (5) Release Type Z New 1: Cancel 1E: Page Change Complete Revision (6) Document Title: Meeting Minutes for the WMA C PA Engineering System #1 Working Session (7) ChangelReleese Summary of meeting between DOE-ORP and Hanford Site regulators/stakeholders regarding Description: Waste Management Area C performance assessment on Engineering System #1. (5) Change N/A Justification: (9) Associated (a) Structure Location: (c) Building Number: Structure, System, and Component N/NA (SSC) and Building (b) System Designator: (d) Equipment ID Number (EIN):. Number: (10) Impacted (a) Document Type (b) Document Number (c) Document Revision

160

Hanford Site | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Hanford Site Hanford Site Workers safely demolished a 175-foot-high exhaust stack at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state, a project supported by $420,000 in Recovery Act funds Workers safely demolished a 175-foot-high exhaust stack at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state, a project supported by $420,000 in Recovery Act funds Slurry pumps are used in the tank farms to pick up liquid and solid particle mixture, or slurry, and provide the force necessary to transport the waste from tank to tank during retrieval operations Slurry pumps are used in the tank farms to pick up liquid and solid particle mixture, or slurry, and provide the force necessary to transport the waste from tank to tank during retrieval operations The Pretreatment Facility control room building pad (foreground) and the Low-Activity Waste Facility (background)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

HANFORD SITE ASSETS AND ATTRIBUTES  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HANFORD SITE ASSETS AND ATTRIBUTES HANFORD SITE ASSETS AND ATTRIBUTES The Hanford Site provides the opportunity for long-term sustainable energy and industry development. The area boasts a specialized workforce that is highly educated and well-established; is rich in resources including land, infrastructure, low-cost energy, and available workforce; more scientists and engineers per capita than any other area in the Pacific Northwest; and is an optimum location for the development of sustainable energy solutions. Land The Hanford Site is one of the largest remaining land mega-sites available in the United States. * The 586-square-mile Hanford Site includes 39,000 acres designated for industrial use (9,000 acres for R&D). * The Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement allows for a planning process

162

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for the Environmental for the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1 . 0 Summary . . 2.0 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . 3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Proposed Action 3.2 Onsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Offsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . 3.4 No Action Alternative ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Atmospheric Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Terrestrial Impacts . 5.1.3 Impacts on CERCLA Remedial Actions . 5.1.4 Construction Accidents .

163

Hanford defense mission: Past, present and future  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes the origin of Hanford, and its role in the Manhattan Project, its current role, and what is seen for Hanford in the future. Emphasis is on Hanford's defense mission. However, Hanford is a national resource in a number of areas and some of these are mentioned as well.

Munson, L.F.

1986-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Safe as mother's milk: the Hanford project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Safe As Mother's Milk: The Hanford Project is a web site and physical installation exploring the atomic history of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. For more than forty years, Hanford released radioactive materials into the environment on an uninformed ... Keywords: Hanford, Manhattan Project, cold war, documentary, education resource, plutonium, radiation

Kim Stringfellow

2003-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

Hanford Small Scale Mixing Demonstration Program  

Hanford Small Scale Mixing Demonstration Program EM Waste Processing Technical Exchange November 17, 2010 Mike Thien

166

Overview of the spent nuclear fuel project at Hanford  

SciTech Connect

The Spent Nuclear Fuel Project`s mission at Hanford is to {open_quotes}Provide safe, economic and environmentally sound management of Hanford spent nuclear fuel in a manner which stages it to final disposition.{close_quotes} The inventory of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Hanford Site covers a wide variety of fuel types (production reactor to space reactor) in many facilities (reactor fuel basins to hot cells) at locations all over the Site. The 2,129 metric tons of Hanford SNF represents about 80% of the total US Department of Energy (DOE) inventory. About 98.5% of the Hanford SNF is 2,100 metric tons of metallic uranium production reactor fuel currently stored in the 1950s vintage K Basins in the 100 Area. This fuel has been slowly corroding, generating sludge and contaminating the basin water. This condition, coupled with aging facilities with seismic vulnerabilities, has been identified by several groups, including stakeholders, as being one of the most urgent safety and environmental concerns at the Hanford Site. As a direct result of these concerns, the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project was recently formed to address spent fuel issues at Hanford. The Project has developed the K Basins Path Forward to remove fuel from the basins and place it in dry interim storage. Alternatives that addressed the requirements were developed and analyzed. The result is a two-phased approach allowing the early removal of fuel from the K Basins followed by its stabilization and interim storage consistent with the national program.

Daily, J.L. [Dept. of Energy, Richland, WA (United States). Richland Operations Office; Fulton, J.C.; Gerber, E.W.; Culley, G.E. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

EA-1189: Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed Waste,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9: Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed 9: Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed Waste, Richland, Washington EA-1189: Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed Waste, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to demonstrate the feasibility of commercial treatment of contact-handled low-level mixed waste to meet existing Federal and State regulatory standards for eventual land disposal at the U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 29, 1998 EA-1189: Finding of No Significant Impact Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed Waste September 29, 1998 EA-1189: Final Environmental Assessment Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed Waste

168

Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project (DOE-eis-0325)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project Record of Decision March 2003 Bonneville Power Administration Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project Record of Decision Decision The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to construct the proposed Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project in Benton, Douglas, Grant, Kittitas, and Yakima Counties, Washington. BPA has decided to implement the Agency Preferred Alternative identified in the Schultz-Hanford Area Transmission Line Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0325, January 2003), with the exception of Option 1 of the Sickler-Schultz Reroute. Due to landowner concerns, BPA will now implement Option 2 of the Sickler-Schultz Reroute. The Agency Preferred Alternative consists of constructing a new 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission

169

EA-0904: Access Road from State Route 240 to the 200 West Area Hanford  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Access Road from State Route 240 to the 200 West Area 4: Access Road from State Route 240 to the 200 West Area Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-0904: Access Road from State Route 240 to the 200 West Area Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to construct an access road on the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, from State Route 240 to Beloit Avenue in the 200 West Area. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 10, 1994 EA-0904: Finding of No Significant Impact Access Road from State Route 240 to the 200 West Area Hanford Site, Richland, Washington March 10, 1994 EA-0904: Final Environmental Assessment Access Road from State Route 240 to the 200 West Area Hanford Site,

170

U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EA-1728-F DOE/EA-1728-F Final Environmental Assessment F-1 February 2012 APPENDIX F FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ON THE HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON (DOE/EA-1728) AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY An Environmental Assessment (EA) for Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (DOE/EA-1728) has been prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); the Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations [CFR], Parts 1500-1508); and DOE's National Environmental Policy Act Implementing

171

Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office...

172

Fifth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public: Chapter Dedicated...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fifth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public: Chapter Dedicated to Potential Future Uses of the Hanford Site Fifth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public: Chapter...

173

Microbial Community Dynamics of Lactate Enriched Hanford Groundwaters  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Dynamics of Lactate Enriched Hanford Groundwaters Jenniferof Energy site at Hanford, WA, has been historicallyof lactate-enriched Hanford well H-100 groundwater sample.

Mosher, Jennifer J.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Workers at Hanford Site Achieve Recovery Act Legacy Cleanup Goals...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

at Hanford Site Achieve Recovery Act Legacy Cleanup Goals Ahead of Schedule Workers at Hanford Site Achieve Recovery Act Legacy Cleanup Goals Ahead of Schedule The Hanford Site...

175

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2011 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2011 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2011 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary More Documents & Publications Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary -...

176

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - September 2010 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2010 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - September 2010 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank...

177

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - September 2009 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2009 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - September 2009 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank...

178

Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People...

179

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - February 2009 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2009 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - February 2009 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank...

180

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, conducted August 18 through September 5, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Hanford Site. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Hanford Site, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey team developed a Sampling and Analysis Plan to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during its on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory or a support contractor. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the Environmental Survey Interim Report for the Hanford Site. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the Hanford Site Survey. 44 refs., 88 figs., 74 tabs.

Not Available

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, conducted August 18 through September 5, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Hanford Site. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Hanford Site, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey team developed a Sampling and Analysis Plan to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during its on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory or a support contractor. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the Environmental Survey Interim Report for the Hanford Site. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the Hanford Site Survey. 44 refs., 88 figs., 74 tabs.

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

HANFORD K BASINS SLUDGE RETREIVAL & TREATMENT  

SciTech Connect

This paper shows how Fluor Hanford and BNG America have combined nuclear plant skills from the US and the UK to devise methods to retrieve and treat the sludge that has accumulated in K Basins at the Hanford site over many years. Retrieving the sludge is the final stage in removing fuel and sludge from the basins to allow them to be decontaminated and decommissioned, thus removing the threat of contamination of the Columbia River. A description is given of sludge retrieval using vacuum lances and specially developed nozzles and pumps into Consolidation Containers within the basins. The special attention that had to be paid to the heat generation and potential criticality issues with the irradiated uranium-containing sludge is described. The processes developed to re-mobilize the sludge from the Consolidation Containers and pump it through flexible and transportable hose-in-hose piping to the treatment facility are explained with particular note made of dealing with the abrasive nature of the sludge. The treatment facility, housed in an existing Hanford building is described, and the uranium-corrosion and grout encapsulation processes explained. The uranium corrosion process is a robust, tempered process very suitable for dealing with a range of differing sludge compositions. The grout process to produce the final waste form is backed by BNG America's 20 years experience of grouting radioactive waste at Sellafield and elsewhere. The use of transportable and re-usable equipment is emphasized and its role noted in avoiding new plant build that itself will require cleanup. The processes and techniques described in the paper are shown to have wide applicability to nuclear cleanup worldwide.

VASQUEZ, D.A.

2005-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

183

REVIEW OF RHEOLOGY MODIFIERS FOR HANFORD WASTE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As part of Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL)?s strategic development scope for the Department of Energy ? Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) waste feed acceptance and product qualification scope, the SRNL has been requested to recommend candidate rheology modifiers to be evaluated to adjust slurry properties in the Hanford Tank Farm. SRNL has performed extensive testing of rheology modifiers for use with Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) simulated melter feed ? a high undissolved solids (UDS) mixture of simulated Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank Farm sludge, nitric and formic acids, and glass frit. A much smaller set of evaluations with Hanford simulated waste have also been completed. This report summarizes past work and recommends modifiers for further evaluation with Hanford simulated wastes followed by verification with actual waste samples. Based on the review of available data, a few compounds/systems appear to hold the most promise. For all types of evaluated simulated wastes (caustic Handford tank waste and DWPF processing samples with pH ranging from slightly acidic to slightly caustic), polyacrylic acid had positive impacts on rheology. Citric acid also showed improvement in yield stress on a wide variety of samples. It is recommended that both polyacrylic acid and citric acid be further evaluated as rheology modifiers for Hanford waste. These materials are weak organic acids with the following potential issues: ? The acidic nature of the modifiers may impact waste pH, if added in very large doses. If pH is significantly reduced by the modifier addition, dissolution of UDS and increased corrosion of tanks, piping, pumps, and other process equipment could occur. Smaller shifts in pH could reduce aluminum solubility, which would be expected to increase the yield stress of the sludge. Therefore, it is expected that use of an acidic modifier would be limited to concentrations that do not appreciably change the pH of the waste. ? Organics are typically reductants and could impact glass REDOX if not accounted for in the reductant addition calculations. ? Stability of the modifiers in a caustic, radioactive environment is not known, but some of the modifiers tested were specifically designed to withstand caustic conditions. ? These acids will add to the total organic carbon content of the wastes. Radiolytic decomposition of the acids could result in organic and hydrogen gas generation. These potential impacts must be addressed in future studies with simulants representative of real waste and finally with tests using actual waste based on the rheology differences seen between SRS simulants and actual waste. The only non-organic modifier evaluated was sodium metasilicate. Further evaluation of this modifier is recommended if a reducing modifier is a concern.

Pareizs, J.

2013-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

184

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Partnership Annual Meeting Partnership Annual Meeting Terrestrial Best Practices Manual Sean I. Plasynski, PhD Sequestration Technology Manager November 16, 2009 Mostly CO 2 CO 2 Mostly H 2 Mixed Gas Stream and other gases 2 BSCSP WESTCARB SWP PCOR MGSC MRCSP SECARB Terrestrial Project Categorization Agricultural soils Soil Reclamation Afforestation Accounting/Aggregation Wetlands Reclamation J A B C D E F G I H K Terrestrial Field Tests - Tree-plantings - No-till farming - Wetlands restoration - Land management: grasslands, grazing lands - Fire management - Forest preservation - Monitoring, mitigation, and verification technologies 3 CCS Best Practice Manuals Critical Requirement For Significant Wide Scale Deployment Capturing Lessons Learned Best Practice Manual Version 1 (Phase II) Version 2 (Phase III) Final Guidelines

185

Presentation title goes here  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Future of DR Future of DR March 3, 2011 Sila Kiliccote, Mary Ann Piette, Dave Watson, Rish Ghatikar Deputy, DRRC Program Manager, LBNL SKiliccote@lbl.gov 2 Presentation Overview * Trends * Policy * Technology * Implementations * Load As Resource in Ancillary Services Markets * Future directions towards responsive buildings 3 Trends Policy Dynamic Rates - Large C&I, residential, small commercial Codes and Standards -Title 24, US Green Building Council's LEED Credits Smart Grid Standards effort Ancillary Services Technology Integration of Renewables Energy Storage Technologies - Can DR replace storage? PHEVs and EVs Implementation Linking Energy Efficiency and DR Utility Implementations Smart Grid Investment and Demonstration Grants 4 Demand Side Management and Automated DR Future

186

Hanford Site 1998 Environmental Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Hanford Site environmental report is prepared annually to summarize environmental data and information, to describe environmental management performance, to demonstrate the status of compliance with environmental regulations, and to highlight major environmental programs and efforts. The report is written to meet requirements and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and to meet the needs of the public. This summary has been written with a minimum of technical terminology. Individual sections of the report are designed to: describe the Hanford Site and its mission; summarize the status of compliance with environmental regulations; describe the environmental programs at the Hanford Site; discuss the estimated radionuclide exposure to the public from 1998 Hanford Site activities; present the effluent monitoring, environmental surveillance, and groundwater protection and monitoring information; and discuss the activities to ensure quality.

RL Dirkes; RW Hanf; TM Poston

1999-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

187

Hanford Site Environmental Report 1993  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hanford Site Environmental Report is prepared annually to summarize environmental data and information, describe environmental management performance, and demonstrate the status of compliance with environmental regulations. The report also highlights major environmental programs and efforts. The report is written to meet reporting requirements and Guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) an to meet the needs of the public. This summary has been written with a minimum of technical terminology. Individual sections of the report are designed to (a) describe the Hanford Site and its mission, (b) summarize the status in 1993 of compliance with environmental regulations, (c) describe the environmental programs at the Hanford Site, (d) discuss estimated radionuclide exposure to the public from 1993 Hanford activities, (e) present information on effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance, including ground-water protection and monitoring, (f) discuss activities to ensure quality. More detailed information can be found in the body of the report, the appendixes, and the cited references.

Dirkes, R.L.; Hanf, R.W.; Woodruff, R.K. [eds.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Hanford Site Environmental Report 1999  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Hanford Site environmental report is prepared annually to summarize environmental data and information, to describe environmental management performance, to demonstrate the status of compliance with environmental regulations, and to highlight major environmental programs and efforts. The report is written to meet requirements and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and to meet the needs of the public. This summary has been written with a minimum of technical terminology. Individual sections of the report are designed to: (1) describe the Hanford Site and its mission; (2) summarize the status of compliance with environmental regulations; (3) describe the environmental programs at the Hanford Site; (4) discuss the estimated radionuclide exposure to the public from 1999 Hanford Site activities; (5) present the effluent monitoring, environmental surveillance, groundwater protection and monitoring information; and (6) discuss the activities to ensure quality.

TM Poston; RW Hanf; RL Dirkes

2000-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

189

Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible May 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The Hanford site exceeded its goal of reducing fleet vehicles by 15 percent in fiscal year 2012. The overall reduction that year was 25.4 percent. The Hanford site exceeded its goal of reducing fleet vehicles by 15 percent in fiscal year 2012. The overall reduction that year was 25.4 percent. An electric charging station for electric vehicles is located at the Hanford site. An electric charging station for electric vehicles is located at the Hanford site. Lead acid batteries are collected at the Hanford Centralized Consolidation/Recycling Center. Other items recycled at Hanford include aerosol products, aluminum cans and foil, audio tapes, boxes, cell phones, chemicals and computers.

190

Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible Green Initiatives Keep Hanford Site Environmentally Responsible May 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The Hanford site exceeded its goal of reducing fleet vehicles by 15 percent in fiscal year 2012. The overall reduction that year was 25.4 percent. The Hanford site exceeded its goal of reducing fleet vehicles by 15 percent in fiscal year 2012. The overall reduction that year was 25.4 percent. An electric charging station for electric vehicles is located at the Hanford site. An electric charging station for electric vehicles is located at the Hanford site. Lead acid batteries are collected at the Hanford Centralized Consolidation/Recycling Center. Other items recycled at Hanford include aerosol products, aluminum cans and foil, audio tapes, boxes, cell phones, chemicals and computers.

191

Hanford EM Report.pmd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Hanford Site Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance U.S. Department of Energy May 2004 SSA Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 2.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................... 3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................ 5 4.0 RATINGS ....................................................................................... 7 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ............................ 9 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS .......................................11

192

Hanford internal dosimetry program manual  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the Hanford Internal Dosimetry program. Program Services include administrating the bioassay monitoring program, evaluating and documenting assessments of internal exposure and dose, ensuring that analytical laboratories conform to requirements, selecting and applying appropriate models and procedures for evaluating internal radionuclide deposition and the resulting dose, and technically guiding and supporting Hanford contractors in matters regarding internal dosimetry. 13 refs., 16 figs., 42 tabs.

Carbaugh, E.H.; Sula, M.J.; Bihl, D.E.; Aldridge, T.L.

1989-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project  

SciTech Connect

The objective of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project is to estimate the radiation doses that individuals and populations could have received from nuclear operations at Hanford since 1944. The project is divided into the following technical tasks. These tasks correspond to the path radionuclides followed, from release to impact on humans (dose estimates): Source terms; environmental transport environmental monitoring data; demographics, agriculture, food habits; environmental pathways and dose estimates.

Finch, S.M.; McMakin, A.H. (comps.)

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

HANFORD WASTE MINERALOGY REFERENCE REPORT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report lists the observed mineral phases present in the Hanford tanks. This task was accomplished by performing a review of numerous reports that used experimental techniques including, but not limited to: x-ray diffraction, polarized light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy, and particle size distribution analyses. This report contains tables that can be used as a quick reference to identify the crystal phases observed in Hanford waste.

DISSELKAMP RS

2010-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

195

HANFORD WASTE MINEROLOGY REFERENCE REPORT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report lists the observed mineral phase phases present in the Hanford tanks. This task was accomplished by performing a review of numerous reports using experimental techniques including, but not limited to: x-ray diffraction, polarized light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy, and particle size distribution analyses. This report contains tables that can be used as a quick reference to identify the crystal phases present observed in Hanford waste.

DISSELKAMP RS

2010-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

196

Expert Panel Recommendations for Hanford Double-Shell Tank Life Extension  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Expert workshops were held in Richland in May 2001 to review the Hanford Double-Shell Tank Integrity Project and make recommendations to extend the life of Hanford's double-shell waste tanks. The workshop scope was limited to corrosion of the primary tank liner, and the main areas for review were waste chemistry control, tank inspection, and corrosion monitoring. Participants were corrosion experts from Hanford, Savannah River Site, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and several consultants. This report describes the current state of the three areas of the program, the final recommendations of the workshop, and the rationale for their selection.

Stewart, Charles W.; Bush, Spencer H.; Berman, Herbert S.; Czajkowski, Carl J.; Divine, James R.; Posakony, Gerald J.; Johnson, A. B.; Elmore, Monte R.; Reynolds, D. A.; Anantatmula, Ramamohan P.; Sindelar, Robert L.; Zapp, Philip E.

2001-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

197

THERMAL PROPERTIES OF GABLE MOUNTAIN BASALT CORES HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1974. 7. Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company, Research andGABLE MOUNTAIN BASALT CORES HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION L.

Martinez-Baez, L.F.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Enforcement Letter, Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc- July 31, 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Issued to Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., related to Incomplete Corrective Actions at the Hanford Site, July 31, 1998

199

MANHATTAN PROJECT B REACTOR HANFORD WASHINGTON [HANFORD'S HISTORIC B REACTOR (12-PAGE BOOKLET)  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Site began as part of the United States Manhattan Project to research, test and build atomic weapons during World War II. The original 670-square mile Hanford Site, then known as the Hanford Engineer Works, was the last of three top-secret sites constructed in order to produce enriched uranium and plutonium for the world's first nuclear weapons. B Reactor, located about 45 miles northwest of Richland, Washington, is the world's first full-scale nuclear reactor. Not only was B Reactor a first-of-a-kind engineering structure, it was built and fully functional in just 11 months. Eventually, the shoreline of the Columbia River in southeastern Washington State held nine nuclear reactors at the height of Hanford's nuclear defense production during the Cold War era. The B Reactor was shut down in 1968. During the 1980's, the U.S. Department of Energy began removing B Reactor's support facilities. The reactor building, the river pumphouse and the reactor stack are the only facilities that remain. Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office offers escorted public access to B Reactor along a designated tour route. The National Park Service (NPS) is studying preservation and interpretation options for sites associated with the Manhattan Project. A draft is expected in summer 2009. A final report will recommend whether the B Reactor, along with other Manhattan Project facilities, should be preserved, and if so, what roles the DOE, the NPS and community partners will play in preservation and public education. In August 2008, the DOE announced plans to open B Reactor for additional public tours. Potential hazards still exist within the building. However, the approved tour route is safe for visitors and workers. DOE may open additional areas once it can assure public safety by mitigating hazards.

GERBER MS

2009-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

200

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at Hanford. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 835, DOELAP, DOE-RL, ORP, PNSO, and Hanford contractor requirements. The dosimetry system is operated by PNNLs Hanford External Dosimetry Program (HEDP) which provides dosimetry services to all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee (HPDAC) which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since its inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNLs Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture (ERICA) database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving significant changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Maintenance and distribution of controlled hard copies of the manual by PNNL was discontinued beginning with Revision 0.2. Revision Log: Rev. 0 (2/25/2005) Major revision and expansion. Rev. 0.1 (3/12/2007) Updated Chapters 5, 6 and 9 to reflect change in default ring calibration factor used in HEDP dose calculation software. Factor changed from 1.5 to 2.0 beginning January 1, 2007. Pages on which changes were made are as follows: 5.23, 5.69, 5.78, 5.80, 5.82, 6.3, 6.5, 6.29, and 9.2. Rev 0.2 (8/28/2009) Updated Chapters 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9. Chapters 6 and 8 were significantly expanded. References in the Preface and Chapters 1, 2, 4, and 7 were updated to reflect updates to DOE documents. Approved by HPDAC on 6/2/2009. Rev 1.0 (1/1/2010) Major revision. Updated all chapters to reflect the Hanford site wide implementation on January 1, 2010 of new DOE requirements for occupational radiation protection. The new requirements are given in the June 8, 2007 amendment to 10 CFR 835 Occupational Radiation Protection (Federal Register, June 8, 2007. Title 10 Part 835. U.S., Code of Federal Regulations, Vol. 72, No. 110, 31904-31941). Revision 1.0 to the manual replaces ICRP 26 dosimetry concepts and terminology with ICRP 60 dosimetry concepts and terminology and replaces external dose conversion factors from ICRP 51 with those from ICRP 74 for use in measurement of operational quantities with dosimeters. Descriptions of dose algorithms and dosimeter response characteristics, and field performance were updated to reflect changes in the neutron quality factors used in the measurement of operational quantities.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Title 44 Excerpts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 Excerpts 4 Excerpts The United States Code - Title 44 PUBLIC PRINTING AND DOCUMENTS And Miscellaneous Statutes Identify the Authority of the Joint Committee on Printing 1997 EDITION CHAPTER 5 - PRODUCTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PRINTING AND BINDING Section 501. Government printing, and blank-book work for Congress, the Executive Office, the Judiciary, other than the Supreme Court of the United States, and every executive department, independent office and establishment of the Government, shall be done at the Government Printing Office, except- (1) classes of work the Joint Committee on Printing considers to be urgent or necessary to have done elsewhere; and (2) printing in field printing plants operated by an executive department, independent office of establishment, and the procurement of printing by an executive department,

202

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of June 2010 Recordable Injury Cases * Custodian - Shoulder strain - Use of a wet vacuum with worn rollers caused strain of shoulder region. * Custodian - Contusion of thumb - Due to construction site activity, the walkway was constricted and obstructed. Movement of the refuse barrel on the walkway became awkward and

203

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of May 2010 Recordable Injury Cases * Custodian - Knee strain - While walking on level ground outside B64, the employee heard a 'pop' and felt a sharp knee pain. * Truck Driver - Inhalation of solvents - While delivering packages and picking up material in B90, the employee became overcome by solvent

204

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of October 2008 Recordable Injury Case * There was one recordable case in October - An employee was standing on a seismic bracing support while working on scientific apparatus. The employee slipped off the bracing resulting in an ankle strain. - This was a Lost Work Day Case * ISM Deficiency

205

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of October 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Chemist Post Doc Fellow - Laceration of finger - EE was disconnecting tubing from a condenser. The condenser broke from the forces applied and EE sustained small laceration. * Custodian - Knee strain - EE was pivoting to reach for a waste container and

206

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

November 30, 2011 November 30, 2011 These slides are updated on a monthly basis as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Injury/Illness Cases - Slip / Trip / Fall November 2011 * Computer Systems Engineer - Chipped tooth and bruised buttocks - While descending stairs from a building at Argonne National Lab, the LBNL employee slipped on the second step down from the top landing. The employee was carrying a server unit

207

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of January 2011 Injury/Illness Cases * Mechanical Engineering Technician - Minor contusion to hand - While using a hand truck to raise and move a pallet, the employee applied additional force to handle to lift load by pressing on the hand gripping the hand truck handle. * Guest Postdoctoral Fellow - Hand laceration

208

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

October 31, 2011 October 31, 2011 These slides are updated on a monthly basis as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Injury/Illness Cases - Slip / Trip / Fall October 2011 * Administrative Specialist - Fractured nose and facial abrasion - The employee slipped and fell against the steps while ascending the wet wooden stairway behind 50F [WWY 089]. * Custodian - Foot strain - The employee slipped and twisted the right foot while

209

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

09 09 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of December 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Graduate Student Research Assistant - Repetitive strain of shoulder - EE worked at optical microscope station, lab bench, and computer workstations for extended time periods without assessing ergonomic factors. * Student Assistant - Thumb laceration

210

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

09 09 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of February 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Computer ergonomics - right hand and shoulder strain - Developed pain in right shoulder and right hand several weeks after moving work locations. The set-up of the new work station caused EE to twist in odd positions to perform her job. * Slip/Trip/Fall - laceration of forehead

211

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of November 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Truck Driver - Contusion of knee - EE tripped over an uneven floor joint while delivering a package. - The floor elevation reveal had been previously blocked by fixed equipment. - The building occupants had removed the fixed object but not addressed the trip hazard.

212

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

January 31, 2012 January 31, 2012 These slides are updated on a monthly basis as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Injury/Illness Cases - January 2012 Ergonomic (keyboard/mouse) * Repetitive strain multiple upper extremities - The Computer Systems Engineer developed acute symptoms of pain and discomfort of the shoulders and upper extremities after using a laptop computer while on travel. Less than

213

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of April 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Technician - Musculoskeletal strain - Employee felt an acute pain in left shoulder while turning steering wheel. * Shop work - strain - EE was treated for aggravation of non- occupational upper arm injury. * Shop work - strain - EE was treated for upper arm discomfort

214

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 10 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of August 2010 Recordable Injury Cases * Student Assistant - Strain/sprain of ankles, bruises - While quickly going down ATM stairs, was holding wallet in hands. Fell from upper step and landed on hands on landing at bottom of steps. * Biologist Research Sci/Eng - Repetitive strain of neck

215

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of April 2010 Recordable Injury Cases * Computer Systems Engineer - Finger strain - Associated with mouse use at computer workstation. (A case from 2009 that became recordable in April of 2010) 3 Narrative of April 2010 First Aid Cases * Administrative Assistant - Wrist strain - Loading and unloading boxes of conference

216

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of August 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Material Specialist - Knee strain while climbing stairs - EE reported to Health Services after twisting left knee while climbing stairs after arriving at work in the morning. * Property Specialist - Laceration to scalp due to fall on staircase

217

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

August 31, 2011 August 31, 2011 These slides are updated on a monthly basis as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Injury/Illness Cases - Slip / Trip / Fall August 2011 * Administrator - Abrasions and contusions, multiple - The employee lost balance and fell from the second step of a platform ladder while retrieving supplies from a shelf in the supply storage room. 3 Injury/Illness Cases - Material Handling

218

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of June 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Senior Research Technician - Upper extremity strain - EE reported right upper extremity pain that relates to computer and repetitive laboratory bench process work. * Senior Administrator - Lower back pain - EE reported to Health Services with lower back

219

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 These slides are updated on a monthly basis as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Injury/Illness Cases - Musculoskeletal May 2011 * Electrician Apprentice - Strain of right wrist - The employee was tightening a beam clamp with an open end wrench and felt a "pop" in the wrist. * Custodian - Knee strain - The employee noted some pain in the knee while ascending and descending stairs.

220

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Porse and Bruce Kobelski Porse and Bruce Kobelski U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water October 5, 2010 Considerations for Rule Finalization and Implementation of the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for Carbon Dioxide Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells 2010 Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Annual Review 2 Presentation Overview  Topics to be covered include:  GS Rule Development and Finalization  Class VI Permitting and Primacy Applications After Rule Promulgation  Guidance Development and Available Tools  Rule Implementation Workshops 3 GS Rule Development and Finalization  UIC Program Background  GS Rulemaking Update 4 UIC Program Background  1974 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA; Reauthorized in 1996)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of January 2010 Recordable Injury Cases * Guest Postdoctoral Fellow - Second degree burn of forearm - Employee spilled hot agarose gel on forearm. * Principal Research Technician - Elbow and shoulder strain - Employee had developed discomfort and pain in the upper extremities in July of 2009 in response to

222

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

December 31, 2011 December 31, 2011 These slides are updated on a monthly basis as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Injury/Illness Cases - December 2011 Slip / Trip / Fall * Administrative Assistant - Contusion of knee - The employee slipped on a steep portion of the paved driveway (possibly on the built up painted crosswalk striping) to the N4 parking area. * Subcontracts Administrator - Contusion of hand

223

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov New Features NEW NEW 2 New Features * "At A Glance" clip art descriptor used in case narratives. - Examples * Slip, Trip and Fall * Computer Workstation Ergonomic * Struck Against * Two new slides that compare organizational injury case profile by month. - Science Divisions - Operations Divisions

224

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of October 2008 Recordable Injury Case * There was one recordable case in October - An employee was standing on a seismic bracing support while working on scientific apparatus. The employee slipped off the bracing resulting in an ankle strain. - This was a Lost Work Day Case * ISM Deficiency

225

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of March 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Employee experienced a sudden acute onset of pain in the wrist and hand while performing routine computer keyboard activities. * Computer ergonomics - strain - Employee was treated for upper trunk and extremity pain related to a combination of workstation changes and

226

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of February 2010 Recordable Injury Cases * Custodian - Lower back strain - Employee developed pain while lifting refuse bags. * Carpenter - Shoulder strain - Employee felt pain sensation while hoisting a bucket of tools (using a rope) to the roof top work location. [December case reported in Feb.]

227

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of September 2009 Recordable Injury Cases * Research Associate - Repetitive strain of hands - EE experienced discomfort and pain from a combination of laboratory (pipetting) manipulations and keyboard and mouse use. * Physicist - Laceration forearm - EE slipped while descending stairway in B50B and

228

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 10 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of October 2010 Injury/Illness Cases * Guest Student Assistant - Finger contusion - While plumbing additional signal cables in a NIM bin rack the left middle finger struck the blade of one of the cooling fans. * Materials Project Scientist/Engineer - Allergic response - Employee experienced a sudden onset of allergy

229

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of December 2008 Recordable Injury Case * No injuries incurred during December were classified as recordable during the month of December, however: - A keyboard / mouse repetitive strain case reported in November 08 became recordable in December - The case was initially reported as

230

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Narrative of February 2011 Injury/Illness Cases * Electrical Engineer - Ankle strain - While walking to office after arriving at work in the morning, the employee's knee buckled causing the ankle to roll. * Postdoctoral Fellow - Clean needle puncture of finger - While manipulating a needle attached to a building

231

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 These slides are updated on a monthly basis as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. Every effort is made to present accurate and final data. However, changes may occur in subsequent months as additional information becomes available and as developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 Injury/Illness Cases - Slip / Trip / Fall June 2011 * Administrator - Fractured wrist - The employee fell to the parking lot surface while walking. * Project Manager - Contusion of wrist and hand - The employee tripped while ascending exterior wooden staircase (handrail was not used). * Custodian - Ankle sprain

232

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

SciTech Connect

As a generator of transuranic (TRU) and TRU mixed waste destined for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the Hanford Site must ensure that its TRU waste meets the requirements of US. Department of Energy (DOE) 0 435.1, ''Radioactive Waste Management,'' and the Contact-Handled (CH) Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP-WAC). WIPP-WAC requirements are derived from the WIPP Technical Safety Requirements, WIPP Safety Analysis Report, TRUPACT-II SARP, WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, and Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 191/194 Compliance Certification Decision. The WIPP-WAC establishes the specific physical, chemical, radiological, and packaging criteria for acceptance of defense TRU waste shipments at WIPP. The WPP-WAC also requires that participating DOE TRU waste generator/treatment/storage sites produce site-specific documents, including a certification plan, that describe their program for managing TRU waste and TRU waste shipments before transferring waste to WIPP. Waste characterization activities provide much of the data upon which certification decisions are based. Waste characterization requirements for TRU waste and TRU mixed waste that contains constituents regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are established in the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Waste Analysis Plan (WAP). The Hanford Site Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) (HNF-2599) implements the applicable requirements in the WAP and includes the qualitative and quantitative criteria for making hazardous waste determinations. The Hanford Site must also ensure that its TRU waste destined for disposal at WPP meets requirements for transport in the Transuranic Package Transporter-11 (TRUPACT-11). The US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) establishes the TRUPACT-11 requirements in the Safety Analysis Report for the TRUPACT-II Shipping Package (TRUPACT-11 SARP). In addition, a TRU waste is eligible for disposal at WIPP only if it has been generated in whole or in part by one or more of the activities listed in Section 10101(3) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. DOE sites must determine that each waste stream to be disposed of at WIPP is ''defense'' TRU waste. (See also the definition of ''defense'' TRU waste.). Only CH TRU wastes meeting the requirements of the QAPjP, WIPP-WAP, WPP-WAC, and other requirements documents described above will be accepted for transportation and disposal at WIPP.

GREAGER, T.M.

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

SciTech Connect

As a generator of transuranic (TRU) and TRU mixed waste destined for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the Hanford Site must ensure that its TRU waste meets the requirements of US. Department of Energy (DOE) 0 435.1, ''Radioactive Waste Management,'' and the Contact-Handled (CH) Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP-WAC). WIPP-WAC requirements are derived from the WIPP Technical Safety Requirements, WIPP Safety Analysis Report, TRUPACT-II SARP, WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, and Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 191/194 Compliance Certification Decision. The WIPP-WAC establishes the specific physical, chemical, radiological, and packaging criteria for acceptance of defense TRU waste shipments at WIPP. The WPP-WAC also requires that participating DOE TRU waste generator/treatment/storage sites produce site-specific documents, including a certification plan, that describe their program for managing TRU waste and TRU waste shipments before transferring waste to WIPP. Waste characterization activities provide much of the data upon which certification decisions are based. Waste characterization requirements for TRU waste and TRU mixed waste that contains constituents regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are established in the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Waste Analysis Plan (WAP). The Hanford Site Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) (HNF-2599) implements the applicable requirements in the WAP and includes the qualitative and quantitative criteria for making hazardous waste determinations. The Hanford Site must also ensure that its TRU waste destined for disposal at WPP meets requirements for transport in the Transuranic Package Transporter-11 (TRUPACT-11). The US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) establishes the TRUPACT-11 requirements in the Safety Analysis Report for the TRUPACT-II Shipping Package (TRUPACT-11 SARP). In addition, a TRU waste is eligible for disposal at WIPP only if it has been generated in whole or in part by one or more of the activities listed in Section 10101(3) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. DOE sites must determine that each waste stream to be disposed of at WIPP is ''defense'' TRU waste. (See also the definition of ''defense'' TRU waste.). Only CH TRU wastes meeting the requirements of the QAPjP, WIPP-WAP, WPP-WAC, and other requirements documents described above will be accepted for transportation and disposal at WIPP.

GREAGER, T.M.

2000-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

234

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hanford Site Transuranic Waste Certification Plan establishes the programmatic framework and criteria within which the Hanford Site ensures that contract-handled TRU wastes can be certified as compliant with the WIPP WAC and TRUPACT-II SARP.

GREAGER, T.M.

1999-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

235

Hanford Site Transuranic (TRU) Waste Certification Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hanford Site Transuranic Waste Certification Plan establishes the programmatic framework and criteria with in which the Hanford Site ensures that contract-handled TRU wastes can be certified as compliant with the WIPP WAC and TRUPACT-II SARP.

GREAGER, T.M.

1999-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

236

Enforcement Documents - Hanford | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Enforcement Documents - Hanford September 13, 2012 Enforcement Letter,CH2M HILL Plateau - NEL-2012-02 Issued to CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company related to...

237

COMPOSITE INDEX OF HANFORD ENGINEERING STANDARDS  

SciTech Connect

Hanford Atomic Production Operation composite index refers to subjects contained in the nine handbooks and manuals published under the Hanford Engineering Standard Program. This index is described in TID-4100(Suppl.). (N.W.R.)

1963-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

Estimating Contaminant Release Concentrations from Hanford ...  

& Transport Model Long-Term Performance Assessment ... sludge provide upper limit on future releases. 9 Metals Concentrations in Hanford Tank ...

239

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

February 29, 2008 February 29, 2008 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 LBNL Recordable Cases FY08 vs FY06 and FY07 through February 29, 2008 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 O c t o b e r N o v e m b e r D e c e m b e r J a n u a r y F e b r u a r y M a r c h A p r i l M a y J u n e J u l y A u g u s t S e p t e m b e r Num ber of Case s FY '06 Total = 37 Cases FY '07 Total = 47 Cases FY ' 08 Total To Date = 16 Cases 3 LBNL DART Cases FY08 vs FY06 and FY07

240

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 LBNL Recordable Cases FY '08 vs FY '06 and FY '07 through October 31, 2007 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 O c t o b e r N o v e m b e r D e c e m b e r J a n u a r y F e b r u a r y M a r c h A p r i l M a y J u n e J u l y A u g u s t S e p t e m b e r Num ber of Case s FY '06 Total = 37 Cases FY '07 Total = 47 Cases FY '08 Total To Date = 8 Cases 3 LBNL Injury Cases By Division for FY'06, FY'07, and FY'O8

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 These slides are updated on a monthly basis, as soon as data are reasonably final for the preceding month. Hours worked are estimated monthly and updated with final and actual values quarterly. While every effort is made to present accurate and final data, data may change in subsequent months, as additional information becomes available and as later developments change the recordability of some cases. Refer questions about these charts to rwfisher@lbl.gov 2 LBNL Recordable Cases FY06 through August 31 FY08 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Number of Cases FY '06 Total = 37 Cases FY '07 Total = 48 Cases FY '08 Total To Date = 45 Cases 3 LBNL DART Cases FY06 through August 31 FY08 0 1 2 3 4 5 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Number of Cases FY '06 Total = 8 Cases

242

HANFORD SITE RIVER CORRIDOR CLEANUP  

SciTech Connect

In 2005, the US Department of Energy (DOE) launched the third generation of closure contracts, including the River Corridor Closure (RCC) Contract at Hanford. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made on cleaning up the river shore that bordes Hanford. However, the most important cleanup challenges lie ahead. In March 2005, DOE awarded the Hanford River Corridor Closure Contract to Washington Closure Hanford (WCH), a limited liability company owned by Washington Group International, Bechtel National and CH2M HILL. It is a single-purpose company whose goal is to safely and efficiently accelerate cleanup in the 544 km{sup 2} Hanford river corridor and reduce or eliminate future obligations to DOE for maintaining long-term stewardship over the site. The RCC Contract is a cost-plus-incentive-fee closure contract, which incentivizes the contractor to reduce cost and accelerate the schedule. At $1.9 billion and seven years, WCH has accelerated cleaning up Hanford's river corridor significantly compared to the $3.2 billion and 10 years originally estimated by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Predictable funding is one of the key features of the new contract, with funding set by contract at $183 million in fiscal year (FY) 2006 and peaking at $387 million in FY2012. Another feature of the contract allows for Washington Closure to perform up to 40% of the value of the contract and subcontract the balance. One of the major challenges in the next few years will be to identify and qualify sufficient subcontractors to meet the goal.

BAZZELL, K.D.

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project  

SciTech Connect

The objective of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project is to estimate the radiation doses that individuals and populations could have received from nuclear operations at Hanford since 1944. The project is being managed and conducted by the Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories under contract with the Centers for Disease Control. The independent Technical Steering Panel (TSP) provides technical direction. The project is divided into the following technical tasks. These tasks correspond to the path radionuclides followed, from release to impact on humans (dose estimates): source terms; environmental transport; environmental monitoring data; demography, food consumption, and agriculture; environmental pathways and dose estimates.

Finch, S.M.; McMakin, A.H. (comps.)

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

HANFORD DECOMMISSIONING UPDATE 09/2007  

SciTech Connect

Fluor Hanford's K Basins Closure (KBC) Project tallied three major accomplishments at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Hanford Site in Southeastern Washington State this past summer. The Project finished emptying the aging K East Basin of both sludge and the last pieces of scrap spent nuclear fuel. It also Completed vacuuming the bulk of the sludge in the K West Basin into underwater containers. The 54-year-old concrete basins once held more than four million pounds of spent nuclear fuel and sit less than 400 yards from the Columbia River. Each basin holds more than a million gallons of radioactive water. In 2004, Fluor finished removing all the spent nuclear fuel from the K Basins. Nearly 50 cubic meters of sludge remained--a combination of dirt, sand, small pieces of corroded uranium fuel and fuel cladding, corrosion products from racks and canisters, ion-exchange resin beads, polychlorinated biphenyls, and fission products that had formed during the decades that the spent nuclear fuel was stored underwater. Capturing the sludge into underwater containers in the K East Basin took more than two years, and vacuuming the much smaller volume of sludge into containers in the K West Basin required seven months. Workers stood on grating above the basin water and vacuumed the sludge through long, heavy hoses. The work was complicated by murky water and contaminated solid waste (debris). Pumping was paused several times to safely remove and package debris that totaled more than 370 tons. In October 2006, Fluor Hanford workers began pumping the sludge captured in the K East Basin containers out through a specially designed pipeline to underwater containers in the K West Basin, about a half mile away. They used a heavy but flexible, double-walled ''hose-in-hose'' system. Pumping work progressed slowly at first, but ramped up in spring 2007 and was completed on May 31. Just a week before sludge transfers finished, the KBC Project removed the last few small pieces of irradiated fuel (about 19 pounds) found as the last remnants of sludge were vacuumed up. The fuel was loaded into a cask that sat underwater. The cask was hoisted out of the water, decontaminated, and transported to the K West Basin, where it is now being stored underwater until it can be dried and taken to storage in central Hanford. Removing the sludge and fuel from the K East Basin eliminated the final major radioactive sources there, and made the Columbia River and the adjacent environment safer for everyone who lives downstream. Fluor's priority at the K East Basin quickly turned to final preparations for demolishing the structure. Final activities to sort debris are progressing, along with plans to de-water the basin and turn it to rubble in the next two years. At the K West Basin, after the bulk sludge was removed July 3, workers began preparing to load out the last of the ''found'' nuclear fuel and to complete final pass sludge collection this coming year.

GERBER, M.S.

2007-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

245

EIS-0222: Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22: Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan 22: Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS-0222: Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan SUMMARY DOE has prepared the EIS to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with implementing a comprehensive land-use plan (CLUP) for the Hanford Site for at least the next 50 years. DOE is expected to use this land-use plan in its decision-making process to establish what is the "highest and best use" of the land (41 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 101-47, "Federal Property Management Regulations"). The final selection of a land-use map, land-use policies, and implementing procedures would create the working CLUP when they are adopted through the ROD for the EIS. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

246

EA-1203: Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, 3: Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1203: Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to widen and operate the unused Trench 33 in the 218-W-5 Low-Level Burial Ground at the U.S. Department of Energy's Richland Operations Office. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 28, 1997 EA-1203: Finding of No Significant Impact Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 28, 1997 EA-1203: Final Environmental Assessment Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

247

Oversight Reports - Hanford | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 13, 2013 December 13, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - December 2013 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction Quality September 26, 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - July 2013 Operational Awareness of Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Low Activity Waste Melter Process System Hazards Analysis Activity [HIAR-WTP-2013-07-31] September 23, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site - September 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Hanford Site August 30, 2013 Independent Oversight Activity Report, Office of River Protection - May 2013 Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection

248

Title IX | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IX IX Title IX Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in all educational programs and activities of institutions that receive federal financial assistance. The law states, in part, that: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Click here to learn more: 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a) The Office of Civil Rights is responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance with Title IX, investigating Title IX-related complaints, and providing technical assistance related to Title IX to recipients of Department of Energy financial assistance.

249

Hanford Site environmental management specification  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) uses this Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification (Specification) to document top-level mission requirements and planning assumptions for the prime contractors involved in Hanford Site cleanup and infrastructure activities under the responsibility of the US Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. This Specification describes at a top level the activities, facilities, and infrastructure necessary to accomplish the cleanup of the Hanford Site and assigns this scope to Site contractors and their respective projects. This Specification also references the key National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), and safety documentation necessary to accurately describe the cleanup at a summary level. The information contained in this document reflects RL`s application of values, priorities, and critical success factors expressed by those involved with and affected by the Hanford Site project. The prime contractors and their projects develop complete baselines and work plans to implement this Specification. These lower-level documents and the data that support them, together with this Specification, represent the full set of requirements applicable to the contractors and their projects. Figure 1-1 shows the relationship of this Specification to the other basic Site documents. Similarly, the documents, orders, and laws referenced in this specification represent only the most salient sources of requirements. Current and contractual reference data contain a complete set of source documents.

Grygiel, M.L.

1998-06-10T23:59:59.000Z

250

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water October 6, 2008 Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide EPA Proposed Rulemaking NETL Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 2 EPA's Proposed GS Rule: Outline Brief UIC Background Proposal Development Process Components of the Proposed Rule Schedule for Final Rule Public Hearing Results 3 UIC Background - Safe Drinking Water Act Authority The 1974 SDWA (Reauthorized in 1996) Minimum federal regulations for protection of Underground Sources of Drinking Water (USDWs) USDW defined: Any aquifer or portion of an aquifer that contains water that is less than 10,000 PPM total dissolved solids or contains a volume of water such that it is a present, or viable future, source for a Public Water Supply

251

No Slide Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee Member Appointment Process January 2008 Inquire: member interest in reappointment for 2008-2010 Submit re-charter documents for 2 advisory committees Invite/review resumes Prepare Slate of Committee Members for DFO review General Counsel review of Slate of Committee Members General Counsel review of SGE financial disclosure General Counsel concurrence on final member roster Member appointments by Secretary of Energy Members receive Draft 2009 Annual Plan September 2008 1 st Meeting of New Committees; SGE Oath of Office October 2008 2 nd and 3 rd Committee Meetings November 2008 Publish 2009 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources UDAC Membership * Energy Policy Act of 2005 - Subtitle J--Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other

252

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a Hydrogen a Hydrogen Cities Concept Applied to a Representative Community TIAX LLC Acorn Park Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140-2390 Reference: D0242 Final Report Prepared for DOE/NETL Prepared under CTC Subcontract 030400101 July 14, 2004 1 BZ/db/HydroCities/D0242/2-4/04 Agenda Purpose and Scope Description of Southpointe SOFC Technology Description Analytical Approach Waste-Heat-Utilization Possibilities Integration with Hydrogen Production Conclusions and Recommendations Appendices 2 BZ/db/HydroCities/D0242/2-4/04 Agenda Purpose and Scope Description of Southpointe SOFC Technology Description Analytical Approach Waste-Heat-Utilization Possibilities Integration with Hydrogen Production Conclusions and Recommendations Appendices 3 BZ/db/HydroCities/D0242/2-4/04 Purpose/Scope The objective of this assignment was to assess the potential benefits of

253

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

From Existing From Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants Jared Ciferno National Energy Technology Laboratory Final Results Revised: December 2007 Original Publication Date: December 2006 2 Disclaimer This presentation was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not

254

TRACKING CLEAN UP AT HANFORD  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, known as the ''Tri-Party Agreement'' (TPA), is a legally binding agreement among the US Department of Energy (DOE), The Washington State Department of Ecology, and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for cleaning up the Hanford Site. Established in the 1940s to produce material for nuclear weapons as part of the Manhattan Project, Hanford is often referred to as the world's large environmental cleanup project. The Site covers more than 580 square miles in a relatively remote region of southeastern Washington state in the US. The production of nuclear materials at Hanford has left a legacy of tremendous proportions in terms of hazardous and radioactive waste. From a waste-management point of view, the task is enormous: 1700 waste sites; 450 billion gallons of liquid waste; 70 billion gallons of contaminated groundwater; 53 million gallons of tank waste; 9 reactors; 5 million cubic yards of contaminated soil; 22 thousand drums of mixed waste; 2.3 tons of spent nuclear fuel; and 17.8 metric tons of plutonium-bearing material and this is just a partial listing. The agreement requires that DOE provide the results of analytical laboratory and non-laboratory tests/readings to the lead regulatory agency to help guide then in making decisions. The agreement also calls for each signatory to preserve--for at least ten years after the Agreement has ended--all of the records in it, or its contractors, possession related to sampling, analysis, investigations, and monitoring conducted. The Action Plan that supports the TPA requires that Ecology and EPA have access to all data that is relevant to work performed, or to be performed, under the Agreement. Further, the Action Plan specifies two additional requirements: (1) that EPA, Ecology and their respective contractor staffs have access to all the information electronically, and (2) that the databases are accessible to, and used by, all personnel doing TPA-related work. The Hanford Environmental Databases document and track the progress of Site cleanup--Hanford Environmental Information System (HEIS), Hanford Well Information Data System (HWIS), the Waste Information Data System (WIDS), and the Hanford Geographic Information System (HGIS). HEIS contains the date, time, location, and results from samples taken during activities such as field investigations and groundwater monitoring. HWIS contains the details of the wells and boreholes on the Site. WIDS tracks the waste sites--from discovery through cleanup. Each of the databases is supported by several applications for entering or retrieving information. HGIS keeps track of the locations for waste (WIDS) sites, wells and boreholes, and other sampling site locations. Of the applications used to extract data from the Environmental Databases, the Hanford Map Portal (QMAP) is the newest, and perhaps the most efficient. QMAP combines the HGIS spatial information with the information from the other databases so that users may browse to, or query, the waste site or well of interest. A query of a waste site or well engages QMAP to find the object and then the user may access the appropriate database. This paper describes the Environmental Databases and their maintenance, as well as the applications used to access them. Collectively, these databases are a critical element in formally documenting the work and associated decisions made during the cleanup of Hanford.

CONNELL, C.W.

2005-05-27T23:59:59.000Z

255

HIGH ALUMINUM HLW GLASSES FOR HANFORDS WTP  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The world's largest radioactive waste vitrification facility is now under construction at the United State Department of Energy's (DOE's) Hanford site. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is designed to treat nearly 53 million gallons of mixed hazardous and radioactive waste now residing in 177 underground storage tanks. This multi-decade processing campaign will be one of the most complex ever undertaken because of the wide chemical and physical variability of the waste compositions generated during the cold war era that are stored at Hanford. The DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) has initiated a program to improve the long-term operating efficiency of the WTP vitrification plants with the objective of reducing the overall cost of tank waste treatment and disposal and shortening the duration of plant operations. Due to the size, complexity and duration of the WTP mission, the lifecycle operating and waste disposal costs are substantial. As a result, gains in High Level Waste (HLW) and Low Activity Waste (LAW) waste loadings, as well as increases in glass production rate, which can reduce mission duration and glass volumes for disposal, can yield substantial overall cost savings. EnergySolutions and its long-term research partner, the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) of the Catholic University of America, have been involved in a multi-year ORP program directed at optimizing various aspects of the HLW and LAW vitrification flow sheets. A number of Hanford HLW streams contain high concentrations of aluminum, which is challenging with respect to both waste loading and processing rate. Therefore, a key focus area of the ORP vitrification process optimization program at EnergySolutions and VSL has been development of HLW glass compositions that can accommodate high Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} concentrations while maintaining high processing rates in the Joule Heated Ceramic Melters (JHCMs) used for waste vitrification at the WTP. This paper, reviews the achievements of this program with emphasis on the recent enhancements in Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} loadings in HLW glass and its processing characteristics. Glass formulation development included crucible-scale preparation and characterization of glass samples to assess compliance with all melt processing and product quality requirements, followed by small-scale screening tests to estimate processing rates. These results were used to down-select formulations for subsequent engineering-scale melter testing. Finally, further testing was performed on the DM1200 vitrification system installed at VSL, which is a one-third scale (1.20 m{sup 2}) pilot melter for the WTP HLW melters and which is fitted with a fully prototypical off-gas treatment system. These tests employed glass formulations with high waste loadings and Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} contents of {approx}25 wt%, which represents a near-doubling of the present WTP baseline maximum Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} loading. In addition, these formulations were processed successfully at glass production rates that exceeded the present requirements for WTP HLW vitrification by up to 88%. The higher aluminum loading in the HLW glass has an added benefit in that the aluminum leaching requirements in pretreatment are reduced, thus allowing less sodium addition in pretreatment, which in turn reduces the amount of LAW glass to be produced at the WTP. The impact of the results from this ORP program in reducing the overall cost and schedule for the Hanford waste treatment mission will be discussed.

KRUGER AA; JOSEPH I; BOWMAN BW; GAN H; KOT W; MATLACK KS; PEGG IL

2009-08-19T23:59:59.000Z

256

REVIEW OF RHEOLOGY MODIFIERS FOR HANFORD WASTE  

SciTech Connect

As part of Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL)?s strategic development scope for the Department of Energy ? Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) waste feed acceptance and product qualification scope, the SRNL has been requested to recommend candidate rheology modifiers to be evaluated to adjust slurry properties in the Hanford Tank Farm. SRNL has performed extensive testing of rheology modifiers for use with Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) simulated melter feed ? a high undissolved solids (UDS) mixture of simulated Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank Farm sludge, nitric and formic acids, and glass frit. A much smaller set of evaluations with Hanford simulated waste have also been completed. This report summarizes past work and recommends modifiers for further evaluation with Hanford simulated wastes followed by verification with actual waste samples. Based on the review of available data, a few compounds/systems appear to hold the most promise. For all types of evaluated simulated wastes (caustic Handford tank waste and DWPF processing samples with pH ranging from slightly acidic to slightly caustic), polyacrylic acid had positive impacts on rheology. Citric acid also showed improvement in yield stress on a wide variety of samples. It is recommended that both polyacrylic acid and citric acid be further evaluated as rheology modifiers for Hanford waste. These materials are weak organic acids with the following potential issues:  The acidic nature of the modifiers may impact waste pH, if added in very large doses. If pH is significantly reduced by the modifier addition, dissolution of UDS and increased corrosion of tanks, piping, pumps, and other process equipment could occur. Smaller shifts in pH could reduce aluminum solubility, which would be expected to increase the yield stress of the sludge. Therefore, it is expected that use of an acidic modifier would be limited to concentrations that do not appreciably change the pH of the waste.  Organics are typically reductants and could impact glass REDOX if not accounted for in the reductant addition calculations.  Stability of the modifiers in a caustic, radioactive environment is not known, but some of the modifiers tested were specifically designed to withstand caustic conditions.  These acids will add to the total organic carbon content of the wastes. Radiolytic decomposition of the acids could result in organic and hydrogen gas generation. These potential impacts must be addressed in future studies with simulants representative of real waste and finally with tests using actual waste based on the rheology differences seen between SRS simulants and actual waste. The only non-organic modifier evaluated was sodium metasilicate. Further evaluation of this modifier is recommended if a reducing modifier is a concern.

Pareizs, J.

2013-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

257

Radionuclide air emissions report for the Hanford Site, calendar year 1992  

SciTech Connect

This report documents radionuclide air emissions from the Hanford Site in 1992 and the resulting effective dose equivalent to an member of the public. The report has been prepared and will be submitted in accordance with reporting requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, ``National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants,`` Subpart H, ``National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities.``

Diediker, L.P.; Johnson, A.R. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Rhoads, K.; Klages, D.L.; Soldat, J.K. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Rokkan, D.J. [Science Applications International Corp., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Radionuclide air emissions report for the Hanford site, Calendar year 1994  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents radionuclide air emissions from the Hanford Site in 1994, and the resulting effective dose equivalent to the maximally exposed member of the public, referred to as the ``MEI.`` The report has been prepared and will be submitted in accordance with reporting requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, ``National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants,`` Subpart H, ``National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities.``

Gleckler, B.P.; Diediker, L.P. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Jette, S.J.; Rhoads, K.; Soldat, S.K. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

Title VI | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VI VI Title VI Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance. The law states, in part, that: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The Office of Civil Rights is responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance with Title VI, investigating Title VI-related complaints, and providing technical assistance to recipients of Department of Energy financial assistance. The Department has promulgated regulations that

260

Hanford/Rocky Flats collaboration on development of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction to treat mixed waste  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Proposals for demonstration work under the Department of Energy`s Mixed Waste Focus Area, during the 1996 through 1997 fiscal years included two applications of supercritical carbon dioxide to mixed waste pretreatment. These proposals included task RF15MW58 of Rocky Flats and task RL46MW59 of Hanford. Analysis of compatibilities in wastes and work scopes yielded an expectation of substantial collaboration between sites whereby Hanford waste streams may undergo demonstration testing at Rocky Flats, thereby eliminating the need for test facilities at Hanford. This form of collaboration is premised the continued deployment at Rocky Flats and the capability for Hanford samples to be treated at Rocky Flats. The recent creation of a thermal treatment contract for a facility near Hanford may alleviate the need to conduct organic extraction upon Rocky Flats wastes by providing a cost effective thermal treatment alternative, however, some waste streams at Hanford will continue to require organic extraction. Final site waste stream treatment locations are not within the scope of this document.

Hendrickson, D.W.; Biyani, R.K. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Brown, C.M.; Teter, W.L. [Kaiser-Hill Co., Golden, CO (United States)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant project Preliminary Safety Analysis Report comment response records  

SciTech Connect

The initial draft version of the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP) Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) was issued for review and comment on July 17, 1989, and was designated as Revision A. Following resolution of comments arising from the Revision A review, the PSAR was revised as a final draft. This version, which was designated as HWVP PSAR, Revision B, was issued for review and comment on July 16, 1990. The PSAR was again revised as Revision O following the resolution of the Revision B comments. The HWVP PSAR, Revision O, was approved by Westinghouse Hanford Company (Westinghouse Hanford) on May 21, 1991, and issued as WHC-EP-0250, Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant Preliminary Safety Analysis Report to the Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL). While Westinghouse Hanford organizations were reviewing the drafts of the HWVP PSAR (i.e., Revisions A and B), a parallel review was being performed by the DOE-RL on both versions. This supporting document provides a summary of the PSAR Comment Response Databases for the Westinghouse Hanford and DOE-RL reviews of HWVP PSAR, Revisions A and B. This document also provides copies of all the closed-out Review Comment Records (RCR) submitted by these organizations. 8 refs., 1 fig., 2 tabs.

Herborn, D.I.; Campbell, L.M.

1991-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

G Subject: Implementation of Division B, Title III, Title V and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-74 References: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012,...

263

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - September 2009 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - September 2009 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - September 2009 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm...

264

Isotopic Studies of Contaminant Transport at the Hanford Site, WA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MR-0132. Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland WA. Bretz,in recharge at the Hanford Site. Northwest Science. 66:237-M.J. , ed. 2000. Hanford Site groundwater Monitoring

Christensen, J.N.; Conrad, M.E.; DePaolo, D.J.; Dresel, P.E.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2010 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2010 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting...

266

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - July 2010 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2010 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - July 2010 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank Farm...

267

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2009 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2009 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting...

268

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - January 2010 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - January 2010 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting...

269

Audit Report Hanford Site Contractors' Use of Site Services,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report Hanford Site Contractors' Use of Site Services, WR-B-99-03 Audit Report Hanford Site Contractors' Use of Site Services, WR-B-99-03 To operate the Hanford Site (Site),...

270

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - January 2011 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - January 2011 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting...

271

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - October 2009 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2009 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - October 2009 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Hanford Site C Tank Farm...

272

Hanford Site Videos on YouTube  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

For more than forty years, reactors located at Hanford produced plutonium for America's defense program. The process of making plutonium is extremely inefficient in that a massive amount of liquid and solid waste is generated while only a small amount of plutonium is produced. Additionally, all of the facilities and structures that were associated with Hanford's defense mission must also be deactivated, decommissioned, decontaminated, and demolished. That environmental cleanup project is the work that approximately 11,000 Hanford employees are involved with today [copied from http://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/HanfordsPresentMission]. Snapshots of the work, the issues, and the cleanup successes can be seen on the Hanford Site's YouTube channel. Short clips illustrate demolition projects, installtion of components such as a liner for the landfill, events such as the site fire in 2007 and Secretary of Energy Chu's visit in 2010. Recovery Act Work is highlighted as well.

273

Site Visit Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW - August 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW - August Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW - August 2011 Site Visit Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW - August 2011 August 2011 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project 105-KW Final Safety Analysis Report Review This report documents the results of a review conducted by the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) of selected aspects of the 105-KW Basin Final Safety Analysis Report (HNF-SD-WM-SAR-062, Revision 14C) for the Sludge Treatment Project at the Hanford Site. HSS's review of the K-West Basin FSAR found it to be generally adequate with respect to the scope of this review. However, some aspects of the FSAR accident analyses of two events may warrant further review: MCO transport cask drop into the K-Basin, and the fire accident event involving the cask

274

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project is to estimate the radiation doses that individuals and populations could have received from nuclear operations at Hanford since 1944. The TSP consists of experts in environmental pathways, epidemiology, surface-water transport, ground-water transport, statistics, demography, agriculture, meteorology, nuclear engineering, radiation dosimetry, and cultural anthropology. Included are appointed technical members representing the states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, a representative of Native American tribes, and an individual representing the public. The project is divided into the following technical tasks. These tasks correspond to the path radionuclides followed from release to impact on humans (dose estimates): Source terms, environmental transport, environmental monitoring data, demography, food consumption, and agriculture, and environmental pathways and dose estimates. Progress is discussed.

McMakin, A.H.; Cannon, S.D.; Finch, S.M. (comps.)

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Wyoming coal-conversion project. Final technical report, November 1980-February 1982. [Proposed WyCoalGas project, Converse County, Wyoming; contains list of appendices with title and identification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This final technical report describes what WyCoalGas, Inc. and its subcontractors accomplished in resolving issues related to the resource, technology, economic, environmental, socioeconomic, and governmental requirements affecting a project located near Douglas, Wyoming for producing 150 Billion Btu per day by gasifying sub-bituminous coal. The report summarizes the results of the work on each task and includes the deliverables that WyCoalGas, Inc. and the subcontractors prepared. The co-venturers withdrew from the project for two reasons: federal financial assistance to the project was seen to be highly uncertain; and funds were being expended at an unacceptably high rate.

None

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Hanford Generic Interim Safety Basis  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to identify WHC programs and requirements that are an integral part of the authorization basis for nuclear facilities that are generic to all WHC-managed facilities. The purpose of these programs is to implement the DOE Orders, as WHC becomes contractually obligated to implement them. The Hanford Generic ISB focuses on the institutional controls and safety requirements identified in DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.

Lavender, J.C.

1994-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

277

Oversight Reports - Hanford | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 27, 2010 May 27, 2010 Independent Oversight Inspection, Hanford Site - June 2010 Inspection of the Hanford Site Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program January 20, 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection - December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at the Office of River Protection January 20, 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office July 22, 2009 Independent Oversight Follow-Up Review, Hanford Site - June 2005 Review of Worker Vapor Exposures and Occupational Medicine Program at the Hanford Site, June 2005

278

Siting the International Linear Collider at Hanford  

SciTech Connect

Review of the proposed International Linear Collider, applications in high energy physics, and evaluation of the Hanford Site as a possible location for siting the facilityl.

Kouzes, Richard T.; Asner, David M.; Brodzinski, Ronald L.; Fast, James E.; Miley, Harry S.

2012-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

279

Siting the International Linear Collider at Hanford  

SciTech Connect

Review of the proposed International Linear Collider, applications in high energy physics, and evaluation of the Hanford Site as a possible location for siting the facility.

Kouzes, Richard T.; Asner, David M.; Brodzinski, Ronald L.; Fast, James E.; Miley, Harry S.

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

HANFORD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY NEEDS STATEMENTS 2002  

SciTech Connect

This document: (a) provides a comprehensive listing of the Hanford sites science and technology needs for fiscal year (FY) 2002; and (b) identifies partnering and commercialization opportunities within industry, other federal and state agencies, and the academic community. These needs were prepared by the Hanford projects (within the Project Hanford Management Contract, the Environmental Restoration Contract and the River Protection Project) and subsequently reviewed and endorsed by the Hanford Site Technology Coordination Group (STCG). The STCG reviews included participation of DOE-RL and DOE-ORP Management, site stakeholders, state and federal regulators, and Tribal Nations. These needs are reviewed and updated on an annual basis and given a broad distribution.

WIBLE, R.A.

2002-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Richland Operations Office (Hanford) - Enforcement Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inc. - Press Release, December 16, 2005 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Fluor Hanford, Incorporated, related to Deficiencies with the Design and Safety Basis of the...

282

Hanford Needs Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 1997 This Needs Assessment for former Hanford production workers was developed for the purpose of collecting existing information relevant to exposure and health outcomes...

283

Hanford Needs Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 1997 This Needs Assessment for former Hanford construction workers was developed for the purpose of collecting existing information relevant to exposure and health outcomes...

284

Hanford Treats Record Amount of Groundwater  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Workers have treated more than 800 million gallons of groundwater at the Hanford Site so far this year, a record annual amount.

285

Accelerated Closure of the Hanford Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Cleanup of the Hanford Site is currently planned to take until 2046 and another approximately $SOB. In the summer of 1999, Fluor Hanford initiated an ''Accelerated Closure Team'' to evaluate opportunities to reduce this long schedule and high cost for the parts of the Hanford Site which they manage. To-date, this breakthrough team has developed two approaches which will move > 50 million curies away from the Columbia River sooner than planned and at a significantly reduced cost. The approaches successfully applied so far are presently being applied to other opportunities at Hanford.

WILDE, R.T.

2000-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

286

Independent Oversight Activity Report, Hanford Waste Treatment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(VSL). Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) is the contractor responsible for the design and construction of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) for the...

287

Hanford site technical baseline data dictionary  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this Data Dictionary is to provide information concerning the structure and information contained in the Hanford Site Technical Baseline Database (HSTD).

Baynes, P.A. [Lockheed Martin Hanford Corp., Richland, WA (United States)

1997-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

288

Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This manual defines the Hanford Site radioactive, hazardous, and sanitary solid waste acceptance criteria. Criteria in the manual represent a guide for meeting state and federal regulations; DOE Orders; Hanford Site requirements; and other rules, regulations, guidelines, and standards as they apply to acceptance of radioactive and hazardous solid waste at the Hanford Site. It is not the intent of this manual to be all inclusive of the regulations; rather, it is intended that the manual provide the waste generator with only the requirements that waste must meet in order to be accepted at Hanford Site TSD facilities.

Not Available

1993-11-17T23:59:59.000Z

289

Hanford Site Strategic Facilities Plan: Site planning  

SciTech Connect

This plan revises the Hanford Site Strategic Facilities Plan submitted by Westinghouse Hanford Company in 1988. It separates the Hanford Site facilities into two categories: ''strategically required'' facilities and ''marginal'' facilities. It provides a comparison of future facility requirements against existing capacities and proposed projects to eliminate or consolidate marginal facilities (i.e., those facilities that are not fully utilized or are no longer required to accomplish programmatic missions). The objective is to enhance the operating efficiency of the Hanford Site by maximizing facility use and minimizing unnecessary facility operating and maintenance costs. 11 refs.

1989-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Construction...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

conducted an independent review of selected aspects of construction quality at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project (WTP). The review, which was performed May...

291

MULTIPLE OXIDANT CHROMIUM LEACHING FROM HANFORD WASTE  

MULTIPLE OXIDANT CHROMIUM LEACHING FROM HANFORD WASTE USDOE Aluminum Chromium Leaching Workshop January 24th, 2007 Jennifer E. Holland, Ph.D. Chairman, President, CEO

292

Hanford Boehmite/Chromium Dissolution Data  

Battelle-Pacific Northwest Division Hanford Boehmite/Chromium Dissolution Data R. Peterson, S. Fiskum, J. Geeting, H. Smith, R. Russell, L. Snow, B. Rapko, S. Sinkov,

293

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Systems Working Session (7) ChangeRelease Summary of meeting between DOE-ORP and Hanford Site regulatorsstakeholders regarding Description: Waste Management Area C...

294

Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Construction Quality Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ARPT-WTP-2011-002 Site: DOE Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the...

295

Hanford whole body counting manual  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the Hanford Whole Body Counting Program as it is administered by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) in support of the US Department of Energy--Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and its Hanford contractors. Program services include providing in vivo measurements of internally deposited radioactivity in Hanford employees (or visitors). Specific chapters of this manual deal with the following subjects: program operational charter, authority, administration, and practices, including interpreting applicable DOE Orders, regulations, and guidance into criteria for in vivo measurement frequency, etc., for the plant-wide whole body counting services; state-of-the-art facilities and equipment used to provide the best in vivo measurement results possible for the approximately 11,000 measurements made annually; procedures for performing the various in vivo measurements at the Whole Body Counter (WBC) and related facilities including whole body counts; operation and maintenance of counting equipment, quality assurance provisions of the program, WBC data processing functions, statistical aspects of in vivo measurements, and whole body counting records and associated guidance documents. 16 refs., 48 figs., 22 tabs.

Palmer, H.E.; Rieksts, G.A.; Lynch, T.P.

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

EA-1111: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1111: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of...

297

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hanford Engineer Works ...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Engineer Works - WA 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hanford Engineer Works (WA.01 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site...

298

Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Agreement Energy Secretary Bodman Statement on Hanford Solid Waste Settlement Agreement January 9, 2006 - 9:43am Addthis Richland, WA -...

299

Congressional, State Officials Tour Hanford's Test Site for Safe...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Congressional, State Officials Tour Hanford's Test Site for Safe Tank Waste Cleanup Congressional, State Officials Tour Hanford's Test Site for Safe Tank Waste Cleanup September...

300

Secretary Moniz Meets with Employees, Tribal Leaders during Hanford...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Moniz Meets with Employees, Tribal Leaders during Hanford Visit and Site Tour Secretary Moniz Meets with Employees, Tribal Leaders during Hanford Visit and Site Tour July...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

New Approaches for Understanding the Hanford 300 Area Project...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Science New Approaches for Understanding the Hanford 300 Area New Approaches for Understanding the Hanford 300 Area Yoram.jpg Key Challenges: Simultaneously...

302

Hanford Workers Achieve Success in Difficult Glove Box Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Workers Achieve Success in Difficult Glove Box Project at Plutonium Finishing Plant Hanford Workers Achieve Success in Difficult Glove Box Project at Plutonium Finishing...

303

Hanford Site Celebrates National Native American Heritage Month...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Celebrates National Native American Heritage Month with Educational Workshops Hanford Site Celebrates National Native American Heritage Month with Educational...

304

Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - March 2010 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2010 Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - March 2010 Meeting Summary for Development of the Hanford Site C Tank Farm Performance Assessment Meeting Summary for...

305

Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plan Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plan Project PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plan Project PIA, Richland Operations...

306

Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application documentation consists of both Part A and a Part B permit application documentation. An explanation of the Part A revisions associated with this treatment and storage unit, including the current revision, is provided at the beginning of the Part A section. Once the initial Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit is issued, the following process will be used. As final, certified treatment, storage, and/or disposal unit-specific documents are developed, and completeness notifications are made by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington State Department of Ecology, additional unit-specific permit conditions will be incorporated into the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit through the permit modification process. All treatment, storage, and/or disposal units that are included in the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application will operate under interim status until final status conditions for these units are incorporated into the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit. The Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility contains information current as of May 1, 1993.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

title Brookhaven National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

item item title CDATA Scientists Discover Hidden Magnetic Waves in High Temperature Superconductors title description CDATA X ray technique reveals surprising quantum...

308

Hanford Site waste treatment/storage/disposal integration  

SciTech Connect

In 1998 Waste Management Federal Services of Hanford, Inc. began the integration of all low-level waste, mixed waste, and TRU waste-generating activities across the Hanford site. With seven contractors, dozens of generating units, and hundreds of waste streams, integration was necessary to provide acute waste forecasting and planning for future treatment activities. This integration effort provides disposition maps that account for waste from generation, through processing, treatment and final waste disposal. The integration effort covers generating facilities from the present through the life-cycle, including transition and deactivation. The effort is patterned after the very successful DOE Complex EM Integration effort. Although still in the preliminary stages, the comprehensive onsite integration effort has already reaped benefits. These include identifying significant waste streams that had not been forecast, identifying opportunities for consolidating activities and services to accelerate schedule or save money; and identifying waste streams which currently have no path forward in the planning baseline. Consolidation/integration of planned activities may also provide opportunities for pollution prevention and/or avoidance of secondary waste generation. A workshop was held to review the waste disposition maps, and to identify opportunities with potential cost or schedule savings. Another workshop may be held to follow up on some of the long-term integration opportunities. A change to the Hanford waste forecast data call would help to align the Solid Waste Forecast with the new disposition maps.

MCDONALD, K.M.

1999-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

309

Comments on Hanford 2012 Accelerating Clean Up and Shrinking the Site  

SciTech Connect

In the late summer of 2000, the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL) Manager, Keith Klein, announced his approach to cleanup of the Hanford Site in a document called ''Done in a Decade.'' He asked for comments and suggestions to improve the plan from employees and stakeholders. We received over 300 individual comments. Several of the comments and the Hanford Advisory Board objected to the title of the plan, leading us to change it to ''Hanford 2012 Accelerating Cleanup and Shrinking the Site.'' We addressed virtually all substantive comments, i.e. those that recommended a change in the text, better understanding of an Issue, or consideration of a new Mea, and incorporated editorial comments where appropriate. We thank all those who took time to comment. The new plan, ''Hanford 2012'', is a much better document because you did so. You will notice some things about the table: Comments are not quoted verbatim--most were paraphrased to conserve space; Comments were separated into one of four sections: general, the River, the Plateau, the Future; Commenters are not identified by name or organization; Comments are generally listed in the order in which they were received, several comments were repetitive, but differed slightly so we made an effort to respond to each one, despite apparent repetition; There are many acronyms used at the Hanford Site, most of which can be found on the Web at http:/Ewww.hanford.gov/acronyml. We have attempted to spell out each acronym the first time it's used in a comment/response with the following exceptions: DOE--Department of Energy; RL--Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office; and ORP--Department of Energy, Office of River Protection.

SHERMAN, Y.T.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

DOE Hanford Network Upgrades and Disaster Recovery Exercise Support the Cleanup Mission Now and into the Future - 14303  

SciTech Connect

In 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy?s (DOE) Hanford Site, located in Washington State, funded an update to the critical network infrastructure supporting the Hanford Federal Cloud (HFC). The project, called ET-50, was the final step in a plan that was initiated five years ago called ?Hanford?s IT Vision, 2015 and Beyond.? The ET-50 project upgraded Hanford?s core data center switches and routers along with a majority of the distribution layer switches. The upgrades allowed HFC the network intelligence to provide Hanford with a more reliable and resilient network architecture. The culmination of the five year plan improved network intelligence and high performance computing as well as helped to provide 10Gbps capable links between core backbone devices (10 times the previous bandwidth). These improvements allow Hanford the ability to further support bandwidth intense applications, such as video teleconferencing. The ET-50 switch upgrade, along with other upgrades implemented from the five year plan, have prepared Hanford?s network for the next evolution of technology in voice, video, and data. Hand-in-hand with ET-50?s major data center outage, Mission Support Alliance?s (MSA) Information Management (IM) organization executed a disaster recovery (DR) exercise to perform a true integration test and capability study. The DR scope was planned within the constraints of ET-50?s 14 hour datacenter outage window. This DR exercise tested Hanford?s Continuity of Operations (COOP) capability and failover plans for safety and business critical Hanford Federal Cloud applications. The planned suite of services to be tested was identified prior to the outage and plans were prepared to test the services ability to failover from the primary Hanford datacenter to the backup datacenter. The services tested were: ? Core Network (backbone, firewall, load balancers) ? Voicemail, ? Voice over IP (VoIP) ? Emergency Notification ? Virtual desktops and; ? Select set of production applications and data. The primary objective of the exercise was to test COOP around the emergency operations at Hanford to provide information on capabilities and dependencies of the current system to insure improved focus of emergency, safety and security capacity in a disaster situation. The integration of the DR test into the ET-50 project allowed the testing of COOP at Hanford and allowed the lessons learned to be defined. These lessons learned have helped improve the understanding of Hanford?s COOP capabilities and will be critical for future planning. With the completion of the Hanford Federal Cloud network upgrades and the disaster recovery exercise, the MSA has a clearer path forward for future technology implementations as well as network improvements to help shape the usability and reliability of the Hanford network in support of the cleanup mission.

Eckman, Todd J.; Hertzel, Ali K.; Lane, James J.

2013-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

311

Hanford Site pollution prevention progress report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Richland Operations Office (RL) and Office of River Protection (ORP) are pleased to issue the attached Pollution Prevention Progress Report. We have just met the most aggressive waste reduction and A recycling goals to date and are publishing this report to recognize A the site's progress, and to ensure it will sustain success beyond 1 Fiscal Year 2000. This report was designed to inform the been made by RL and ORP in Waste Minimization (WMin) and Pollution Prevention (P2). RL, ORP and their contractors are committed to protecting the environment, and we reiterate pollution prevention should continue to be at the forefront of the environmental cleanup and research efforts. As you read the attached report, we believe you will see a clear demonstration of RL and ORP's outstanding performance as it has been responsible and accountable to the nation, its employees, and the community in which we live and work. commitment that all employees have for environmental stewardship. The report provides useful information about the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE'S) environmental policy and programs, and contains countless examples of waste minimization projects. This year was the first year our site received the White House Closing the Circle in the category of Affirmative Procurement. This Award recognizes our site for designing a comprehensive strategy for achieving 100 percent purchases of the U.S.Environmenta1 Protection Agency designated recycled items. DOE-Headquarters also acknowledged the site in 1999 for its public outreach efforts in communicating pollution prevention to Hanford Site employees and the community. Our site is truly a recognized leader in outreach as it has kept this title for two consecutive years. In previous years, we received the White House Closing the Circle Honorable Mention in Affirmative Procurement and several other National DOE Awards. Through partnership with the local community and stakeholders, the site and its contractors have a clear sense of direction toward achieving environmental protection, cleanup, and research.

BETSCH, M.D.

1999-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

312

HANFORD REGULATORY EXPERIENCE REGULATION AT HANFORD A CASE STUDY  

SciTech Connect

Hanford has played a pivotal role in the United States' defense for more than 60 years, beginning with the Manhattan Project in the 1940s. During its history, the Hanford Site has had nine reactors producing plutonium for the United States' nuclear weapons program. All the reactors were located next to the Columbia River and all had associated low-level radioactive and hazardous waste releases. Site cleanup, which formally began in 1989 with the signing of the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, also known as the Tri-Party Agreement, involves more than 1,600 waste sites and burial grounds, and the demolition of more than 1,500buildings and structures, Cleanup is scheduled to be complete by 2035. Regulatory oversight of the cleanup is being performed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Revised Code of Washington, 'Hazardous Waste Management.' Cleanup of the waste sites and demolition of the many buildings and structures generates large volumes of contaminated soil, equipment, demolition debris, and other wastes that must be disposed of in a secure manner to prevent further environmental degradation. From a risk perspective, it is essential the cleanup waste be moved to a disposal facility located well away from the Columbia River. The solution was to construct very large engineered landfill that meets all technical regulatory requirements, on the Hanford Site Central Plateau approximately 10kilometers from the river and 100metersabovegroundwater. This landfill, called the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility or ERDF is a series of cells, each 150x 300 meters wide at the bottom and 20 meters deep. This paper looks at the substantive environmental regulations applied to ERDF, and how the facility is designed to protect the environment and meet regulatory requirements. The paper describes how the U.S. Department of Energy(DOE),EPA, and Ecology interact in its regulation. In addition, the response to a recent $1 million regulatory fine is described to show actual interactions and options in this aspect of the regulatory process. The author acknowledges the significant contributions by Messrs. Clifford Clark and Owen Robertson. Ms. Nancy Williams provided graphics support and Ms. Laurie Kraemer edited the report.

HAWKINS AR

2007-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

313

HANFORD REGULATORY EXPERIENCE REGULATION AT HANFORD A CASE STUDY  

SciTech Connect

Hanford has played a pivotal role in the United States' defense for more than 60 years, beginning with the Manhattan Project in the 1940s. During its history, the Hanford Site has had nine reactors producing plutonium for the United States' nuclear weapons program. All the reactors were located next to the Columbia River and all had associated low-level radioactive and hazardous waste releases. Site cleanup, which formally began in 1989 with the signing of the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, also known as the Tri-Party Agreement, involves more than 1,600 waste sites and burial grounds, and the demolition of more than 1,500buildings and structures, Cleanup is scheduled to be complete by 2035. Regulatory oversight of the cleanup is being performed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Revised Code of Washington, 'Hazardous Waste Management.' Cleanup of the waste sites and demolition of the many buildings and structures generates large volumes of contaminated soil, equipment, demolition debris, and other wastes that must be disposed of in a secure manner to prevent further environmental degradation. From a risk perspective, it is essential the cleanup waste be moved to a disposal facility located well away from the Columbia River. The solution was to construct very large engineered landfill that meets all technical regulatory requirements, on the Hanford Site Central Plateau approximately 10kilometers from the river and 100metersabovegroundwater. This landfill, called the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility or ERDF is a series of cells, each 150x 300 meters wide at the bottom and 20 meters deep. This paper looks at the substantive environmental regulations applied to ERDF, and how the facility is designed to protect the environment and meet regulatory requirements. The paper describes how the U.S. Department of Energy(DOE),EPA, and Ecology interact in its regulation. In addition, the response to a recent $1 million regulatory fine is described to show actual interactions and options in this aspect of the regulatory process. The author acknowledges the significant contributions by Messrs. Clifford Clark and Owen Robertson. Ms. Nancy Williams provided graphics support and Ms. Laurie Kraemer edited the report.

HAWKINS AR

2007-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

314

Diffuse and fugitive emission dose assessment on the Hanford Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On February 3, 1993, the US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL), received a Compliance Order and Information Request from the Director of the Air and Toxics Division of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 10. The Compliance Order requires RL to (1) evaluate all radionuclide emission points at the Hanford Site to determine which are subject to continuous emission measurement requirements in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 61, Subpart H, and (2) continuously measure radionuclide emissions in accordance with 40 CFR 61.93. The Information Request requires RL to provide a written Compliance Plan to meet the requirements of the Compliance Order. The RL Compliance Plan included as one of its milestones the requirement to develop a Federal Facility Compliance Agreement (FFCA). An FFCA was negotiated between RL and the EPA, Region 10, and was entered into on February 7, 1994. One of the milestones was to provide EPA, Region 10, with a copy of the Federal Clean Air Act Title V operating air permit application and Air Emission Inventory (AEI) concurrent with its submission to the Washington State Department of Ecology. The AEI will include an assessment of the diffuse and fugitive emissions from the Hanford Site. This assessment does not identify any diffuse or fugitive emission source that would cause an effective dose equivalent greater than 0.1 mrem/yr.

Davis, W.E.; Schmidt, J.W.; Gleckler, B.P. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Rhoads, K. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

Statistical Methods and Tools for Hanford Staged Feed Tank Sampling  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes work conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to technically evaluate the current approach to staged feed sampling of high-level waste (HLW) sludge to meet waste acceptance criteria (WAC) for transfer from tank farms to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The current sampling and analysis approach is detailed in the document titled Initial Data Quality Objectives for WTP Feed Acceptance Criteria, 24590-WTP-RPT-MGT-11-014, Revision 0 (Arakali et al. 2011). The goal of this current work is to evaluate and provide recommendations to support a defensible, technical and statistical basis for the staged feed sampling approach that meets WAC data quality objectives (DQOs).

Fountain, Matthew S.; Brigantic, Robert T.; Peterson, Reid A.

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

Joint Urban 2003: Indoor Measurements Final Data Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Joint Urban 2003: Indoor Measurements Final Data Report Title Joint Urban 2003: Indoor Measurements Final Data Report Publication Type Report Year of Publication 2004 Authors...

317

Hawaiian Electric Company Demand Response Roadmap Project Final...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hawaiian Electric Company Demand Response Roadmap Project Final Report Title Hawaiian Electric Company Demand Response Roadmap Project Final Report Publication Type Report LBNL...

318

Occupancy-Based Energy Management in Buildings: Final Report...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Occupancy-Based Energy Management in Buildings: Final Report to Sponsors Title Occupancy-Based Energy Management in Buildings: Final Report to Sponsors Publication Type Report LBNL...

319

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Value Propositions for Four Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California EESAT 2007 San Francisco by Distributed Utility Associates, Inc. Jim Eyer, Senior Analyst jim@dua1.com Susan Horgan, President susan@dua1.com Funded by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). EESAT 2007 - Eyer - DUA 2 Agenda * Scope * Background * Assessing Value Propositions * Supercapacitor for Sacramento Light Rail * Supercapacitor for Load & DG Integration * Flow Battery for T&D Deferral * Flywheel for Area Regulation * Outlook EESAT 2007 - Eyer - DUA 3 Scope * DOE ESS partnership with CEC/PIER - innovative electricity storage demonstrations in California that are sponsored by CEC/PIER * DUA: Evaluation and Report

320

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Brad Tomer Brad Tomer Director, Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil EPACT Section 999 Federal Advisory Committee Meetings January 28-29, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil * Create public benefits by investing in research that industry would not take on itself * Deliver a balanced portfolio of technology to: - Enable Independents to efficiently produce discovered resources - Conduct long-term/high risk R&D - develop entirely new sources of supply - Minimize environmental impact Implement science and technology programs that resolve the environmental, supply and reliability constraints of oil and natural gas resources and enhance our energy security A multi-discipline, long-term, high-risk, and high-reward endeavor that

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ClTY/CO{TRIBAL): ClTY/CO{TRIBAL): DAT E RE CEIVED: CA-TR iBE-TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA OF CALIFORN IA 61 735 1 937 Tribe Oak Ridge Office COMPLETE STATE: CA Round Two Review: t I BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Develop energy efficiency and con servation strategy and fea si bility study ofthe Rancheria energy usage NEPA REVI EW ER NEPA DECISION (CX/EA/EIS): NHPA ISSU ES NEPAjNHPA CONDITIONS: S.G. Thornton ex CX APPLIED: CX-EECBG -001 LI SUBPART D REF Approval for strategy/feasibility st udy only Ny( Compliance Officer (NCO) Review, including consideration of extraordiOilfy circumstiinceS: ~ction may be categorically ucluded from further NEPA review. I hilve dete rmined that the proposed action meets the requirements for Cltegorical exclusion in Subpart D, Appendix A or B. C Action requires approvill by Head oft

322

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

CHAPTER lV CHAPTER lV 1. PURPOSE. This chapter presents radiological protection requirements and guidelines for cleanup of residual radioactive material and management of the resulting wastes and residues and release of property. These requirements and guidelines are applicable at the time the property is released. Property subject to these criteria indudes, but is not limited to sacs identied by the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) and the Surplus Facilities Management Program (SFMP). The topics covered are basic dose limits, guidelines and authorized limits for allowable levels of residual radioadive material, and control of the radioactive wastes and residues. This chapter does not apply to uranium mill tailings or to properties covered by mandatory legal requirements.

323

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

e ~ a r t m e n t of Energy Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge. Tennessee 37831- November 7, 1995 Dave To1 b e r t B&T Metals Company & B&T F l o o r Company P. 0 . Box 163520 Columbus, Ohio 43216-3520 Dear M r . To1 b e r t : REAL ESTATE LICENSE REORDOER-7-96-0103, B&T METALS COHPANY, COLUMBUS, OH Enclosed f o r your records i s a copy o f the f u l l y executed 1 icense between B&T Metals Company and the Department o f Energy. Is t h e separate l i c e n s e f o r B&T F l o o r Company a l s o being transmitted t o t h i s o f f i c e ? Thank you f o r your cooperation and assistance i n t h i s action. I f you have any questions concerning t h e r e a l e s t a t e instrument, please f e e l f r e e t o contact m e a t 423- 576-0977. Sincerely, Katy Kates Realty O f f i c e r Enclosure As stated

324

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Date: 11/21/35 10:12:16 AM Date: 11/21/35 10:12:16 AM 136930 From: HARTMANGSOoro.doe.gov Subject: Re: CX Determination - B&T Metals Removal Action (FUSRAP-036 HOW about this! This is the first CX determination that we have done electronically - - - same-day turnaround!!! Gary Forwarding routing: Les Price, PSRD Bill Seay, FSRD Dave Adler, PSRD Loren Marz, PSRD Gerry Palau. BNI Dave Sexton, BNI Teresa Noe, BNI (PDCC) Forward Header :~Liject: Re: CX Determination - B&T Metals Removal Action (PUSPAP-036 i~thor: PHILLIPSPW at SE31 8 s 1-5 : 11/21/95 12:OO PM Based on the recommendation of Gary Hartman, Environmental Scientist, EW93, I determine that the subject proposed action is categorically excluded from further NEPA review and documentation. Patricia W. Phillips

325

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

. . · MONTICELLO NPL SITES FFA QUARTERLY REPORT: January 1- March 31, 2007 DOE Site Manager: Jalena Maestas 1.0 MMTS Activities/Status Repository and Pond 4 * Monthly and quarterly inspection of the repository identified no problems other than shrub damage by voles (inspection checklists attached). * Monthly inspection of Pond 4 identified no unacceptable conditions. * Pond 4 leachate detection and removal systems operated at normal levels (leachate pumping summary attached). * Repository leachate collection and removal system (LCRS) and leachate collection system (LDS) operated at normal levels (leachate pumping summary attached). * Equipment purchased to upgrade repository LCRS and LDS remote sensing and telemetry system. * Portions of repository cover were manually re-seeded with desirable shrubs to repair areas

326

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

M M A U h G E D 0 1 M M l N Y A R I E I ENERGY SYSTEMS. IYC. FOR THE U.S. O E P A R I M E I I T OF ENEnOY June 14, 1994 POST OFFICE BOX 2006 OAK RIDGE. TENNESSEE 37831 Dr. W. A. Williams EM-421 Trevion II Building Department of Energy Washington, D. C. 20585 Dear Dr. Williams: T r i p Report: Radiological Survey of Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company Site, Fairfield, Ohio (FOHOOl), M a y 31 and June 1,1994 On May 31 and June I, a radiological survey was conducted in the area surveyed during the March 7, 1994 survey in the referenced facility. This letter provides the results of that survey. Survey methods consisted of a beta-gamma survey of the surface of the concrete as the floor covering material was being removed by a construction contractor to begin renovation of the former

327

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

RIDOH RIDOH NArnONAL LABORATORY c- Results of the Independent Radiological Verification Survey I.* K . . . . 1 A . T I r n * at the Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company Site, Fairfield, Ohio - (FOH001) D . E . Rice M . E . Murray K. S . Brown EEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH DMSION E ' * I ~ m d w a s k M ~ t ~ ~ ~ ( ~ N o . E X Z D 2 0 0 1 O; AB131DM) Aircraft ~ o o l and Manrlaet~ring Company Site, Fiirfleld, Oh10 (FOH001) D. E. Rice, M. E. Mumy, K:S. Brown . . . . lmza@am Tam R D. FdeJr-E-tAppholboPl4DCrdDPllLlltW D. E . Rice - Suvsy Tam iada 1 3 9 3 1 9 CONTENTS .................................................. LISTOFFI- v .................................................. LISTOFTABLES 6 A C K N O - S ............................................. u ABSTRACT ....................................................... xi

328

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) - Contract No. DE-ACOS-9 1 OR21 949 Post-Remedial Action Report for the 8. & T Metals Site Columbus, Ohio October 1996 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT f OR THE . . B&T METALS SITE COLUMBUS. OHIO OCTOBER 1 W6 Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-ACOS-91 OR2 1949 I Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tcnncssoe I Bcchtel lob No. 14501 CONTENTS Page FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................... iv TABLES ................................................................................................................................................ iv

329

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Verification Verification Survey at B&T Metals, 425 West Town Street, Columbus, Ohio M. E. Murray V. P. Patania C. A. Johnson This report h s ken rcpmduccd directly from the t f s i avail3ble copy. Avaihble to DOE and DOE c o n m u x s from the Olficc of Scienlific and Technical inlormaliar. P.O. Boa 6 1 . W Ridsee. l X 378331: priccsav&lable from (6t5) 576-8101, TTS 6268401. A v ~ i t b I e t o h e public lmm the Naliorul Technical Inlormalion Service. U.S. Dcpvtmenl 01 Commcrcc. 5285 Pon Royal Rd.. Springlield. VA 22161. This rcpon was prep& as an account o f work sponsored by an agency o f thc Unircd Sutcs Govcmmcnr. X c i h c ~ thc Uniicd Sulcs Govcrnmcn~ nor any ;Igcncy, Lhcrcol. nor any of theu crnployccs, mikes my warmly. cxprcss, or implicd.or assumcs my legal l i i i l

330

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Peccrdei et .... g:~.g-..o*c *ck .*,- Peccrdei et .... g:~.g-..o*c *ck .*,- &.-. fi+ E C 7 ---.----.- .-.... 3$rS --------- ixx4!30 F A ~ 953 ' 27565' glla 5tcpEe.l. Peeorder Reception N o . - STATE OF COtOPA00 COUFlTY OF GARFIELD MfEREAS, under date of kcember 7 , 1966, an oil and gas l e a s e was entered i n t o between Claude V. Hayward, lessor, snd Rustrat dl1 Ccmpany Incorporated, Lessee, covering, among other l a n d s , t a t 1 1 , being the Northeast Quarter ~b the Southwest Q u a r t e r o f Section 25, f - 7 4 , R-95-W, Garfield County, Calnrnda, sa3d lease being recorded O n 86ak 381, Fag? 418, o f the ~rritdrd$ of B a r f leld County, C s l o r e d ~ ; and @ WWEEA., under date o f l%y 5 , 1967, a U n l t Agrarmnt fas the Dcvelapmnt and Opcratlon o f the Rulison Vn4 t Area I n Gsrfield and He58 Counties Colorado, was entered 1 nto betwen Aus t r

331

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or go to: http://www.FederalReporting.gov 1 Outline of Presentation * Timeline * Helpful Hints for Repeat Reporters * When is FederalReporting.gov Reporting Complete? * FederalReporting.gov Features For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or

332

Title  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Important Aside--Percentage of Ethanol (Alcohol) ... Perform annual comparisons of fuel ethanol plant capacity data from both EIA and non-EIA sources with EIA fuel ...

333

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

and those taken before remedial action) and removal-type actions similar in scope under RCRA and other authorities (induding those taken as partiat closure actions and those...

334

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Schedule based on a 9-mo.year construct ion period, Not total cost for cleanup. Pair market price could be 168,000. VOLUME (1000 CUBIC METERS) NOTE: To convert to cubic...

335

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Description of the Formerly Utilized Description of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program United States Department o f Energy "This book w l r prepartd u a n account 01 wo* lporuond by m uency o f the Unhd Sutes Govrrnmrnt. N a l h r t the United StalrsGovrrnment nos i n y m y lhumf, rm any 01 lheh employees, makes any .nrrmly, u p m r or impkd, or arrunrr my I@ LirbHty or rcsponiibiiily for ihe rccutrcy. wmplaenm. 01 u ~ l u l n e ~ i of any intotnulion, mppmtur, p f d u c t , 01 p r o m s d i ~ l o w d , or rtprrlrntr that i s we MUM mi initlnp plivmdy omd rightr Refnrnce herein L o m y rpedfw wmmrcial produel, pmarr, o r s e n h by b a d e name, tr.demaR, mmufrctunr, or othcrurtrr, doer not mcnrrlly m n n h u u m its endoncmmt, rccommmdalion, or favorin# b y the United Stater Govmment or my y m ~ y thacol. The vi+ur and opiljOna o

336

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

J J a s 1. Besl President Force Control Industries 3664 Dixla H i 9 h p ~ Falrfleld, Ohio 45014 Dear Hr. Besl: With your consent,. the U.S. Dcpartwnt o f Energy (WE) conducted a r a d i o l q l l c a l survey a t the Former Associate A i r c r a f t Tool and Manufrcturlng Conpany s l t e i n Fairfield, Ohio. OOE has received the-auwey report frm i t s survey. contractor, Oak Rldge national Laboratory (OWL). Two copies o f the report are enclosed f o r your information and use. 71.5 report C 0 n ~ l ~ d e S that uranium i s present I n the f a c i l l t y I n excess of the ME guidelines f ~ r restdual r a d l o i c t i v e matertal. This conclusion i s based on d i r e c t radiation r a s u r a r n t s (shorn graphically on Flgures 8 , 9, 14, and Table 5 on pages 8, 9, 22, and 29, respectively) and om analysls o f s o i l samples, dust sllples, m

337

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

SHOAL AREA SHOAL AREA TRACER TEST EXPERlIMENT prepared by Rosemary Carrolt, Todd Mihevc, Greg Pohll, Brad Lyles, Sean Kosinski and Rich Niswonger submitted to Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy Las Vegas, Nevada NOVEMBER 2000 Publication No. 45177 Reference herein to any specific commercial pmduct, process, or service by trade name, trademark, mufacturer, or otherw~se, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views a d opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy.

338

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

- . ' R U L 000003 United States Office of Radiation and ~ ~ ~ - 4 0 2 7 ~ - 0 2 - 0 0 7 Environmental Protection 1ndoor Air November 2002 Agency Washington, DC 20460 &EPA Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2002: SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2002 SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Max G. Davis Terry L. Mouck Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11969 RADIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY OFFICE OF RADIATION AND INDOOR AIR

339

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-. -. i . , . United States Government L-u+-tw / S / V ~ f Department of nersy memorandum D i T E June 0 5 , 1995 FEP-Y ATTK OF: EM-421 (U. A. Williams, 301-903-8149) SUGJECT Hazard Assessmnt f o r Radioactive Contamination a t the Associate. A i r c r a f t Site, F a i r f i e l d , Ohio To L. Price, OR This memorandum i s t o ' provide comments and approval o f the Associate i r ft i t n f o r e n ' i A r c a S eHazardAssessmet I d t i f e d S o i l C ~ m i n a t i o n . The hazard assessment was prepared and supplemental 1 i m i t s were requested, based on a single s o i l sample w i t h 134 picocuries per gran o f uranium. This sample was obtained from underneath the b u i l d i n g slab i n an area t h a t was a loading dock f o r the f a c i l i t y during Atomic Energy Comnission operations during the 1950s. The area i s n o t r e

340

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

amv. amv. I.. - - DESlON CRITERIA FOR f ORMERLV UTILIZISU 81TEb REMEDIAL ACTIUN PROORAM [FUmRAP) AND BURPLUS FACILITIES MANAOEMENT D E S I G N C R I T E R I A POR FORMERLY U T I L I Z E D S I T E S REHEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (?USRAP). AlPD SURPLUS FACILITIES MUINAGEHEIT P R O C R U (SFHP) ( I S S U E D FOR C L I E N T APPROVAL) FEBRUARY 1 9 8 6 ~pproved by: a . CI, Director 2- 24-86 Date T e c h n i c a l Services Division Oak RiPge Operations Office Approved by: 2-24-86 Date Construction and E n g i n e e r i n g Oak Ridge Operations Office 14501-00-DC-01 Rev. 1 PREFACE TO DESIGN CRITERIA T h t s t drsiqn criteria have barn-written i n a generic form that sunmarizes criteria applicable for remedial action and long-term mmagcnent activities associated with the radioactive vaster at the fDSRhP end S?HP sites. Site-specific Information is provided in the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mi Mi w u United S taies Office of Radiation a ~ d EPA 8 Environmental Protection Indoor Air Dcccmbcr 1999 Q Agency Washington, DC 304hC) EPA-402-R-93-0 12 Q w 0 4 : 0 0 0 4 &€PA Annual Water Samp and Analysis Ca endar Year 1999: RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 1999 RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area by Max G. Davis Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AIO8-96NVl1969 FL4DIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY OFFICE OF RADIATION AND INDOOR AIR

342

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Post-Remedial Action Report Post-Remedial Action Report for the Alba Craft Site and Vicinity Properties Oxford , Ohio August 1995 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE A D A CRAFT SITE AND VICINITY PROPERTIES OXFORD, OHIO AUGUST 1995 Prepared f o ~ United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-ACO5-910R21949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS Page FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii UNITS OF MEASURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

, , - :. , L L b ' pi1 2 25. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI a . a . , i l l ; .. - . a ,-. , I , SALMON SITE , , , . . . C I A . - - 1 COUNTY OF LAMAR - T - TRACT NO. 101-E KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that, we, MARTHA T. BRIDGES alkla MARTHA TATUM BRIDGES LOPEZ, ROBERT TODD BRIDGES, MARTHA TATUM BRIDGES LOPEZ as Guardian of Nlchoias Carl Bridges, a minor, DIANA W. TATUM, NANCY 0. TATUM, and ADDISON T. TATUM, JR., alkla A. T. Tatum, Jr., whose addreas I s clo Mr. John Burnam, Post Office Box 1828, Hattiesburg, Mlssisslppi 39403, hereinafter referred to as the GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND NO1100 ($300.09). the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, do hereby GRANT. BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY unto the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

344

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Hydrologic Processes and Hydrologic Processes and Radionuclide Distribution in a Cavity and Chimney Produced by the Cannikin Nuclear Explosion I Amchitka Island, Alaska By HANS C. C M S S E N H Y D R O L O G Y O F N U C L E A R T E S T S I T E S G E O L O G I C A L S U R V E Y P R O F E S S I O N A L P A P E R 7 1 2 - D Prepared on behay o J the US. Energy Research and Deuclopment Administration U N I T E D S T A T E S G O V E R N M E N T P R I N T I N G O F F I C E . W A S H I N G T O N : 1978 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS. sectwary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey. Direcror Library of Conlresr Cnrriolrtn# tn Puhltcrtban Udtr Ct*aaasn. Wnnr C. WydrOlo~nC procesbes and radionucl~dc distributnon in a cavity and chnmncv praduccd by rna Cannukin nuslssr ~ n n l u r r u n . h m c n n u r islrnd. AI;n*U*. (Hydrolory o f nuclssr tcat ritsal (Caoloyicsl Survey Profeuionai P

345

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 ~ 1 ~ ~ l l R R l l l l l l l i l ~ l ~ I R u 0 0 0 0 ~ f A Class 111 Cultural Resources Survey of the U. S. Department of Energy Rullson Gas Stimulation Test S f e Garfield County, Colorado December 1993 IT be?: tlX'i;j PBBRARII Environmental Restoration 1 A Class Ill Cultural Resources Survey of the U. S. Department of Energy Rulison Gas Stimulation Test Site Garfield County, Co torado December 1 993 Environmental Restoration A Class Ill Cultural Resources Survey of the U . S . Department of Energy Rulison Gas Stimulation Test Site Garfield County, Colorado Prepared for: W E Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-8518 Prepared by: I T Corporation 4330 S. Valley View Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89103 Work Performed under Contract No.: DE-AC08-92NV 10972 December 1993

346

Title  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Unlocking Energy Efficiency Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy 2010 Energy Conference EIA, SAIS April 7, 2010 McKinsey & Company | 1 Carbon emissions Gigatons CO 2 e * End-use consumption Quadrillion BTUs * Includes carbon emission abatement potential from CHP Source: EIA AEO 2008, McKinsey analysis Significant energy efficiency potential exists in the U.S. economy Industrial Residential Commercial -9.1 Baseline 2020 Baseline case, 2008 30.8 36.9 39.9 NPV- positive case, 2020 3.2 NPV- positive case, 2020 Baseline 2020 4.3 Baseline case, 2008 3.9 -26% Savings -23% -18% -29% -28% McKinsey & Company | 2 Source: EIA AEO 2008, McKinsey analysis Primary energy End-use energy Electricity CHP Gas Oil Other Carbon emissions 100%= 9.1 quadrillion BTUs 1,080 TWh 2.9 TCF 250 MBOE Significant efficiency potential across fuel types Contribution by energy source to 2020 efficiency potential

347

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jamie Brown Jamie Brown Director, Earth & Mineral Sciences Division EPAct Complementary Program Update January 25, 2008 Office of Research and Development Introduction NETL's EPAct 999 Complementary R&D Program * Overview of the 4 research areas: - Drilling Under Extreme Conditions (DUEC) - improve the economic viability of drilling for and producing from domestic deep (>15, 000ft) and ultra-deep (>25,000ft)O&G resources. - Environmental Impacts of O&G (EI) - provide unbiased scientific information and analysis of the environmental impacts of O&G, and develop new technology to effectively deal with any negative environmental impacts - Enhanced and Unconventional Oil Recovery (EUOR) - develop advanced technologies that will move the status of known but recoverable oil resources to

348

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oil & Natural Gas R&D Oil & Natural Gas R&D National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Fossil Energy 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) EPACT 2005, Subtitle J, Section999 John R. Duda, Deputy Director Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil January 30, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) Development * RPSEA submitted Draft Annual Plan - November 14, 2007 - Modifications to 2007 plan * NETL developed the 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) - Federal Advisory Committees' recommendations - Program status and requirements - Complementary research plan * Submitted to HQ - December 11, 2007 - Incorporated comments from FE, et al * Sent to Federal Advisory Committees - January 9, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) General * "Ongoing activities"

349

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's Upcoming DOE's Upcoming 2012 Congestion Study Keith White California Public Utilities Commission December 15, 2011 2 General Comments ◊ California has been fully participating in west-wide "economic" transmission studies (TEPPC since 2006, recently with much-appreciated ARRA funding) ◊ The 2005 Energy Policy Act gives DOE unclear scope regarding "congestion," and a requirement to consult with states. The following are essential: * Clearly address the specific rationale for transmission: reliability, economic efficiency, resource priorities; * If considering potential future congestion* contingent on certain conditions, fully consider the likelihood of those conditions and the consistency with state energy policies and actual market developments.

350

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CNT OW048 CNT OW048 Review of Environmentally Sensitive Resources at Off-Site Locations Nevada Test Site Nevada ~nvironmental Restoration Review of Environmentally Sensitive Resources at Off-Site Locations Prepared for: U.S. Deparuncnt of Energy Nevada Field Office Las Vcgas, Nevada R e p d by: l T Corporation Las Vcgas, Nevada Work Pcrformcd Under Conmct DE-AC08-92NV10972 March, 1993 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.1 Hazardous. Contaminated. or Polluted Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 1.2 Environmentally Sensitive Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 1.2.1 Property of Historic. Archaeological. or Archirectural Significance . . . . . . 1-3 1 2 . 2 Threatened. Endangered. or Candidate Species .

351

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

James Bennett National Energy Technology Laboratory - USDOE E-Mail: james.bennett@netl.doe.gov Phone: 541-967-5983 Research Efforts at NETL to Improve Gasifier Performance GTC 2013, Colorado Springs, CO - Oct 13-16, 2013 CSC Fouling Refractory/TC Wear RSC Fouling Syngas Cleanup OUTLINE - Research Objectives - Program Overview - Materials Research Focus (Refractories) * Scope of work * Impact to date * Long range goals - Industrial Involvement - Summary/Disclaimer 3 Advanced Gasification Spalling Corrosion Goals: increase gasifier efficiency, reduce capital and operational costs, reduce cost of electricity, develop predictive gasifier models, meet/exceed EPA emission targets, and increase carbon feedstock flexibility (including U.S. low rank coals)

352

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractors Contractors July 2010 Reporting Period 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

353

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Corporare Center Corporare Center f 5 1 Lalayerre Drive P.O. Box 350 Oak Ridge. Tennewt 3783 1.0350 Facsimile: 1 6 1 5 1 220.2 100 ~ o b No. 14501, FUSRAP Project DOE Contract NO. DE-AC05-9 10R2 194 9 Code: 7340/WBS: 135 U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Field Office P . O . BOX 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-8723 Attention: David G. hdler, Site Manager , Former Sites Restoration Division subject: Hazard Assessment for Residual Contaminztion at the Former Associate Aircraft S i t e ' ( P 2 S ) Dear Mr. Adler: Based on sample results obtained a t A4S, uranium-238 concentrations above the site specific criteria (35 pCi/g) were found in a small sub-slab srsa in Section 1 of the former AAS building. The sample results of the location indicated radioactive contamination at a maximum concentration of 134 pci/g. T

354

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

, ,-- , ,-- - < , - ' a 7. *: POST OFFICE BOX 2038 1; : . - - , . MANAGED BY M h M l N M A R I E l T A E N E l G Y S I S l E H S . INC. - .-- OAK RIDGE. TENNESSEE 37831 FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMEIIT OF EWEROI April 22, 1994 Dr. W. k Williams EM-421 Trwion n: Building Department of Energy Washington, D. C 20585-0002 Dear Dr. Williams: In a letter to you dated August 18, 1993, a summary of the initial radiological survey was provided with only limited inionnation regarding mncentratiom in soil samples and radiation measurements inside the house. Since then, all of the samples from the initial survey have been analyzed and additional samples have been collected and anal- The reauits have been provided lo y o u ' d D. G. Adler informally as they became available ' I h i r letter contains all the 'as-found"

355

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nationd Laboratory Nationd Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IUinois 60439 DERIVATION OF GUIDELINES FOR UaANIUbi RESIDUAL &ADIOACTIVE MATERIAL M 801L AT THE FORMER - U T E AIRCRAFT TOOL AND m A C l ' U I U N C COMPANY SlTE, FAIRFIELD, OHIO E.R. Faillace, M . Nimmagadda, and C . Yu Environmental Assessment Division January 1995 work sponsonxl by U.S. Department of Energy OMice of Environmental Restoration Washington, D.C. CONTENTS NOTATION ......................................................... v ............................... 1 1NTRODU.CTION AND BRIEF HISTORY 3 ...................................... 1.1 Site Description and Setting 3 .................................................. 1.2 SiteHistory 4 1.3 Derivation of Cleanup Guidelines .................................. 6

356

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FORCE CONTROL INDUSTRIES,'INC. 1 FORCE CONTROL INDUSTRIES,'INC. 1 2 3 0 7 2 CONTROL %60 Dixie Hwy.. Zip 45014 P.O. Box l a . Z p 45018 11W b l e . Sule F Failfield. Ohio T w M i g a n a8083 Phone: (513) 868-0900 Phone: !B10) 52441= FAX. (513) 868-2105 F . U i81C.l 52d-1208 C,ir Shear Clutch & Brake Systems November 10.1994 U. S. Deparbnent of Energy Oak Ridge Operations office Ann: AD-424, Katy Kates P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Dear Ms. Kates, In furtherance of the August 24,1994 letter from Doug Shook, his subsequent conversation with our legal counsel, Timothy A. Gamy, follow-up with Steve Priest, and your letter of November 4,1994, the modifications you have proposed to the real estate license are acceptabte to us. As you suggested, we have made the changes to the real estate license heretofore submitted to us, and we have enclosed three copies of

357

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Individuals Individuals Step by Step Instructions - Page 1 of 4 Helpful Information STEP 1. Log in to the EH&S Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) system at https://ehswprod.lbl.gov/ehstraining/jha/login.aspx Use your LDAP username and Password to log in to the system. You may log in without an LDAP if you know that you have not been given one yet. Contact the Help Desk (486-4357) for assistance. Note: You will not be able to complete the process until you have a valid LDAP username and password STEP 2. To begin, select JHA New JHA from the Main Menu If you have already begun your JHA process, you can select to Modify or View from the JHA Main Menu item as well. Step by Step Instructions - Page 2 of 4 Helpful Information STEP 3. Begin the Questionnaire by selecting your work location

358

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients July 2010 Reporting Period 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

359

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractors Contractors 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

360

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 1 Clean Energy Developments in the U.S. China-U.S. Renewable Energy Forum Bobi Garrett National Renewable Energy Laboratory May 26, 2010 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 2 Today's Talk * U.S. Clean Energy in Context * The U.S. Recovery Act: Opportunity from Crisis * The U.S. Congress and Clean Energy: Getting to 60 * China-U.S. Collaboration on Clean Energy 2 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 3 Today's Talk 3 * U.S. Clean Energy in Context * The U.S. Recovery Act: Opportunity from Crisis * The U.S. Congress and Clean Energy: Getting to 60 * China-U.S. Collaboration on Clean Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 4 U.S. Energy Production and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site Map Site Map Home Publications Software Facilities Links Staff Glazing Materials Chromogenics LowE and Spectrally Selective Deposition Processes Characterization New Materials Advanced Systems Superwindows Integrated Window Systems Gas-Filled Panels Window Properties Infrared Laboratory and Traversing System MoWiTT Window+5 Development Therm Development Film Coefficients Condensation Resistance Comfort Models Field Measurements LBNL Role in NFRC Optics Database Daylighting IEA Task 21 Lightshelves/Lightpipes Tools for Daylighting Prediction Demonstrations Daylighting Controls Residential Performance Energy Star ResFen Development ECW Demonstrations Annual Energy Rating Field Tests and Monitoring Projects

362

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients July, 2010 For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or go to: http://www.FederalReporting.gov 1 Outline of Presentation * Timeline * Helpful Hints for Repeat Reporters * When is FederalReporting.gov Reporting Complete? * FederalReporting.gov Features For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or

363

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Pantex Finance Benchmark Results Executive Briefing Pantex Finance Benchmark Results Executive Briefing © 2009 The Hackett Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this document or any portion thereof without prior written consent is prohibited. Table of Contents  Benchmark Background  Company Baseline  Executive Summary  Performance Driver Analysis  Recommendations & Next Steps  Appendix Page 3 NNSA - Pantex Finance Benchmark Results Executive Briefing © 2009 The Hackett Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this document or any portion thereof without prior written consent is prohibited. Benchmark Results Should be Evaluated in Conjunction With the Specific Requirements of Pantex's Industry What this benchmark is . . . What this benchmark is not . . .

364

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

p p a * T A olistii. ..ow ... Unlted States awernment 00))#~Tmsnt of Energy - - memorandum D*=APR 0 2 1987 muym NE-23 A m OR W C I : Revised Guidelines f o r Resldual R a d ~ o a c t i v e M a t e r i a l a t N S R A P and R e m t e SRIP S l t e s Ahrends, OR Kluk, OP-124 Nelson, WSSPd Schrelber , SSDPD Welty, EH-23 G I l b e r t , MIL Berven, ORHL Berger, ORAL! Young, Aerospace Attached I s a revjsed copy o f thc Department's Guidelines f o r n s l d u a l r a d l o a c t f v e material. This versfon o f the doculnent has been revised t o i n c l u d e comnents from EH and t o address the h o t spot and s u p p l m n t a l . I i m l t/except{ons procedures out1 i n e d during t h e July 1906 workshop and subsequent working group meetings. EH intends t o include these guidelines i n d r a f t DOE Order 5480.x~. R a d i a t i o n P r o t e c t i o n o f t h e Publlc and

365

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Survey Results Survey Results for Neigh boring Properties of the Alba Craft Site Oxford, Ohio U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Index / / { i s / . . ....................................................... s. Main s t r a e t f i o w e s 3 . . (~1-008,012-014,016) : : , . W . Rose Avenue Properties ............................... .:. ........... I . . .97 (017) Linden Street Properties .................................................... 103 (010-011) Municipd Landfill h d parts of .......................................... 123 Tllpmnd. High School m p t s (018) Hr. J e f f Schroer Department of Energy Washmgton, DC 20585 S t ? i is93 Oxford Real Estate, Inc. 33 Yest Walnut S t m t Oxford, Ohto 4 5 M 6 Dear k. Schorr: W i t h theconsent of the m a r s , the U.S. Dapartrnt o

366

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TO File rn w. 1 1311 300 TO File rn w. 1 1311 300 s ~ b p ~ t B&T Metals Site Scoping Trip Report mh November 22, 1995 hwr J.G. Braun 01 FUSRAP - Geotech ~ l t 4D12 f i t 241-5296 C ~ M S T O Distribution This trip report summarizes the information obtained by b t h the New York and MissourifOhio Teams during visits to the B&T Metals site. The scoping trips were - . - . performed to provide information to aid in the detailed ptanning, design, and preparation for site characterization and remedial action. The scoping trips included a site walkover, library - - - research to investigate historic Sanborn maps and newspaper articles, an interview with a retired 3&T Metals employee who was involved with the former MEDlAEC activities, coordinating with the property owner in preparation for characterization and remedial action,

367

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Sensitive Species Survey Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado December 1 993 & \ Environmental Restoration Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Environmentaf Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89 193-85 18 Prepared by: IT CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View BIvd., Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Performed under Contract No. DE-AC08-92NV 10972 December 1993 Table of Contents . . List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n ... List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv 1.0 Introduction .

368

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OFF C OFF C . 1 Ili II11IlIIllllllllllllllI1111I~I B M - 171- 147 ~ ~ ~ 0 3 3 1 0 8 Biology and M e d i c i n e AMCHITKA BIOENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM BIOENVIRONMENTAL S A F E T Y STUDIES, AMC HITKA ISLAND, ALASKA CANNIKIN D t 2 MONTHS REPORT Compiled by James B . K i r k w o o d and R. G l e n Fuller J u n e , 1972 P r e p a r e d for the U . S. A t o m i c E n e r g y C o m m i s s i o n under C o n t r a c t N o . AT(2b- 1 ) - 17 1 - - BATTELLE Columbus Labor a t o r ies 5 05 King Avenue C o l u m b u s , Ohio 4 3 2 0 1 P r i n t e d i n the United S t a t e s of America. A v a i l a b l e from N a t i o n a l Technical Information S e r v i c e U.S. Department of Commerce S p r i n g f i e l d , V i r g i n i a 22151 This r e p o r t was prepared a s a n account o f work sponsored by t h e United S t a t e s Government. Neither t h e United S t a t e s . - nor t h e United S t a t e s Atomic Energy Carrmission, nor any of

369

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -, , / AMC 000102 ( Nevada DOE/NV--1106-REV. 1 1 Environmental Restoration Project Subsurface Completion Report for Amchitka Underground Nuclear Test Sites: Long Shot, Milrow, and Cannikin Revision No.: 1 September 2006 Approved for public release: further dissemination unlimited Environmental Restoration Project U.S. Department Of Energy National Nuclear Securlty Administration Nevada Sile OMW i - Available for public sale, in p a p from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Poa Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Ernail: prdtr$@ntis.gov Online ordering: htto:/hvww.n~~.~ov/ordenn~.htm Available electronically at htt~://www.osti.rov/hrid~e Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors,

370

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

AMCHITKA BIOLOGICAL IWODlATION S AMCHITKA BIOLOGICAL IWODlATION S J M U I i Y Prspard for tho U. S. Atoric En~rny C d a a i o n undmr Contract No. A T (26-11-171 MTTkUE Colrubua LaboratoriRa 505 Kirq A V ~ R Collubua. Ohio 43201 Printed i n t h e U n i t d S t a t ~ of A l r r i w . A v a i h b l e f t o l - Nrtio-1 Technical I n f o r m t i o n Servic* U. S. D e p a r t u n t o f C o W t E P Sprinlf i a l d , v i + # i n b 22151 Thim r e p o r t naa p r e m r d a m an account of w x k mpon~ored by t h e United S t r t a a Goverrmmnt. Neithnr t h e Unltad S t a t e s nor the United Statem Atomic Energy Caminisaion, nor any of t h e i r employeem, nor any of t h e i r contractor#, subcontrac- t o r # , o r t h e i r eaployeea, makes any varranty, -press or implied, o r assumem any legal l i a b i l i t y o r r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e accuracy. completsnnsn or usefulness of any infor- mation apparatus, product or precesa disclosed, or r

371

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

/ / m - 1 2 0 6 7 4 Department of Energy Oak Ridge *rations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-8723 September 19, 1994 Hr. Saul Gleiser Ohio H i s t o r i c a l Society H i s t o r i c Preservation D i v i s i o n 1982 Yelma Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43211-2497 Dear Mr. Gleiser: ASSOCIATE AIRCRAFT SITE - NHPA (SECTION 106) DETERHINATION I n accordance w i t h Section 106 o f the National H i s t o r i c Preservation Act (NHPA), the Department o f Energy (WE) has determined t h a t the proposed removal o f r a d i o l o g i c a l contamination a t the former Associate A i r c r a f t s i t e located a t 3660 D i x i e Highway, F a i r f i e l d , Ohio, w i l l have no e f f e c t on properties included, o r e l i g i b l e f o r inclusion, on the National Register o f H i s t o r i c Places. A description o f proposed s i t e a c t i v i t i e s i s enclosed, along w

372

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Certificafion Docket for the Certificafion Docket for the Remedial Action Performed af the Associate Aircraft Site, Fairfield, Ohio, 1994- 7 995 Department of Energy Former Sites Restoration Division Oak Ridge Operations Office October 7 996 @ Prnleo m recynmrec)c*ahe paper CERTIFICATION DOCKET FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION PERFORMED AT THE ASSOCIATE AIRCRAFT SITE, FAIRFIELO, OHIO, 1994-1995 OCTOBER 1996 Prepared for UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Oak Ridge Operations Oftice Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R21949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS page FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

373

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

10 G 10 G . Drexel/ M. Poligone F i l e no. 7315/124 s b j e c t Determination of Additional D o t e Contaminated Areas at AAS March 17, 1994 Copies to J. Allison G. Palau K. Thompson A. John At Oak Ridge Ext. 6-5173 The purpose of this memorandum is t o provide results from characterization activities at the Former Associated Aircraft Site (AAS) in Fairfield, Ohio. Additional areas of contamination requiring remediation were identified during these activities. Areas that are currently known to exhibit elevated readings, and were not in the original scope of work are shown in Figure 3. To summarize, the areas added are located in the following areas; North of Zone V in the bathroom area (north of the locker room) and the office (located north of the caged area)

374

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY BACKQROUND RESEARCH REPORT Off-NfS Cukural Rasowcmr Studks: Background Research for Project Shot11 Prepared by Maureen King Alvin R. McLane and William Gray Johnson MAY 1993 DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY BACKGROUND RESEARCH REPORT Off-NTS Cultural Resources Studies: Background Research for Project Shoal Prepared by Maureen King Alvin R. McLane and William Gray Johnson Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Las Vegas, Nevada This document is UNCLASSIFIED Derivative , , ::/>.: ; , . / I : Classifier - & ? " A . + - = / . /.. Desert Research Institute ate.:^^:,'& MAY 1993 The work upon which this report is based was supporred by the U.S. Department of h e r g y under Contract #DE-AC08-90NV10845

375

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 111II1111111111111111111111111 1 111II1111111111111111111111111 GSB WW06 Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1993 y :

376

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OEce of Radiation and OEce of Radiation and 12nvirorunentai Protection Indoor Ailr Washington., DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2000: R'ULISON Tes,t Site Area RLO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Tes it Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site, Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2000 RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area by Max G. Davis Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11969 UDIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY OFFICE OF RADIATION AND INDOOR AIR U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY P.O. BOX 98517 LAS VEGAS, NV 89193-8517 NOTICE

377

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

~overnment ~overnment Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office memorandum DATE: January 19. 1995 SUBIECT: USE OF EXEHPTIOW FROW DEPhRTnEKl OF ENERGY ORDER 5820.2A F O R RADIOhCTIVE WASTE FROn FUSlUl To: James A. Turi , Director, O f f i c e o f Program Support, O f f i c e o f the Deputy Assistant Secretary Waste Clanagelent, M-33, TREY I I This m r a n d u n serves t o n o t i f y 01-33 o f the F o m r l y U t i l i z e d Sites Remedial Action Program's (FUSRAP] i n t e n t t s dispose o f radioactive waste a t a cormercial disposal f a c i l i t y . I n compl iance w i t h the authorization (1. P. G r d l y t o Managers WE Operations Offices dated 10/12/93), the following information i s being provided p r i o r t o comnencement o f the Associate A i r c r a f t , F a i r f i e l d , Ohio, waste stream 2027-01. Waste type: S o i l , vacuum b

378

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

, . . - . . t e d Copj UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Faderal Center, Llcewood, Colorado 80225 BATHYMETRY OF CANNIKIN LAKE, AnCRITU ISLAND. ALASKA, WITH AN EVALUATION OF COMPUTER MAPPING TECHNIQUES Don Digeo GonerLee, Leonard E. Wollltz, and G. E . Brerhauer CONTENTS Page A b s t r a c t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . , . . . . . 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Acknowl.edgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Geologic and hydrologic s e t t i n g . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . 5 Effects of Cannikin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Bathymetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Computerlnepping techniques . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . , . . 9 Comparison o f computer-mapping techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . .

379

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ill lllIlllllllllllllllllllllllIII1 Ill lllIlllllllllllllllllllllllIII1 SHL 000035 Letter Report Contaminant Boundary at the Shoal Underground Nuclear Test prepared by Greg Pohll and Karl Pohlmann Division of Hydrologic Sciences Desert Research Institute University and Community College System of Nevada submitted to Nevada Sitc O f i c e National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Deparuncnt of Enagy Las Vegas, Nevada August 6,2004 The work upon which this report is based was suppomd by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract #DE-AC52-OONVI3609; intended for limited distribution. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, n~anuC;lcturcr, or otherwise, does not necussuily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, 01. favoring by the Unitcd States Govcmmcnl or any agcncy thereof ur its

380

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

~ ~ ~erivation of ~uidelines for Uranium Residual Radioactive Material in soil at the B&T Metals Company Site, Columbus,. Ohio Environmental Assessment Division f i Argonne National Laborgory Operated by The Unlvenlty of ChCago. under Contract w-31-109-Eng-38, lor tne United States Department of Energy Derivation of Guidelines for Uranium Residual Radioactive Material in Soil at the B&T Metals Company Site, Columbus, Ohio by S. Kamboj. M. Nimmagadda, and C. Yu Env~ronmental Assessment Division. Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue. Argonne. Illinois 60439 January 1996 Work sponsored by U.S. Depanment of Energy. Office of Environmental Restoration, Washington, D.C. ; CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

2 Velma Avenue 2 Velma Avenue Columbus, 0h.o 4321 1-2497 6141297-2300 Fax: 297-241 1 OH I 0 HISTORICAL SOCIETY SlSCE 1885 February 23, 1996 David G. Adler, Site Manager F o m r Sites Restoration Division Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. 80x 200T Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 -8723 Dear Mr. Adler: Re: 8 8 T Metal Building, Columbus, Ohio This is in response to your correspondence, received on February 22, 1996, regarding the project noted above. My staff has reviewed carefully the information provided. Based on the description of the proposed work and photographs provided, it is my opinion that the proposed work, if completed as proposed, will have no effect on the integrity of the B 8 T Metal building, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C. No further coordination with

382

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

68 68 OFF C . 2 Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1993 . I \ . j Environmental Restoration Sensitive Species Su wey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1 993 Environmental Restoration 1 Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico Prepared for: U.S. Deparunenr of Energy Environmental Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Officc Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-851 8 Prepared by: I T CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View Blvd.. Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Pcrformcd undcr Contract No. DE-AC08-92NV10972 Table of Contents List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii ... List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . .

383

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

902 902 GEN-BKS - - - . I 111 111 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l Ill SHL 000024 United States Office of Radiation and EPA-402-R-94-001 Environmental Protection Indoor Air January 2004 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2003: SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RI0 BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2003 SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Max G. Davis Terry L. Mouck Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-,4108-96NV11969 RADIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY

384

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE ASSOCIATE AIRCRAJT SITE Fairfield, Ohio Bechtel National, Inc. POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE ASSOCIATE AIRCRAFT SITE FAIRFIELD. OHIO JULY 1996 Prepared for United States Depariment o f Energy Oak Ridge Operations Off= Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R2 1949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 . 1 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.0 REMEDIAL ACTION GUIDELINES .

385

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Bechtel Bechtel Inferoffice Memorandum TO G. L. Palau Subject Scoping Notice:' Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing., Inc . Site, Fairf ield, Ohio copies to T. E. Morris G. R. Gale W & J. S. Allison File No. 7440/124 Date November 1, 1994 Frcm D. D. Sexton MS of ES &H ~t Oak Ridge ~ x t . 4-3643 SCOPING NOTICE INTRODUCTION The purpose of this scoping notice is to formalize the identification and application of federal and state rules and regulations that may apply to the cleanup of the Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Site at 3660 Dixie Highway (hereinafter referred to as the Fairfield Site), in Fairfield, Ohio. This environmental compliance evaluation is based on information contained in the Radiological Survey of the site which provides the nature and extent

386

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

T T O G. L. Palau Subject Scoping Notice: The B&T Metals Site, Columbus, Ohio F i l s No. 744011 13 ~ a t t February 26, 1996 F P m l D. D. Sexton b of Environmental Compliance EX^. Oak Ridge ~t 4-3643 BACKGROUND The purpose of this Scoping Notice is to formalize the identification and evaluate the application of federal and state rulcs and regulations that apply to the cleanup of the B&T Metals site, located in Columbus, Ohio. This environmental compliance evaluation is based on information contained in the Designation Summary of the site (CCN 095792), which provides the nature and extent of radiological contamination, and upon an Engineering and Technology preliminary draft characterization report which identifies the presence and type of chemical and radioactive mixed waste present at the site.

387

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Floodplains and Wetlands Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado December 1 993 Environmental Restoration Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results tor the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89 193-85 18 Prepared By: l T CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View Blvd., Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Performed under Contract No: DE-AC08-92NV 10972 December 1993 Table of Contents . . List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

388

Title  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

External Developments Division External Developments Division Do financial investors destabilize oil prices? The opinions expressed here are personal and not necessarily shared by the ECB or the Eurosystem Energy Information Administration 24 August 2011 by Marco J. Lombardi and Ine van Robays European Central Bank and Ghent Univeristy 2 Motivation * Oil price surged with increasing momentum between 2003-2008 before falling in the wake of the financial crisis and the subsequent economic downturn. After that, prices recovered again. * Oil price increases came against the background of surging demand and stagnating supply. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 2000M01 2001M01 2002M01 2003M01 2004M01 2005M01 2006M01 2007M01 2008M01 2009M01 2010M01 spot oil price in USD/barrel 3 Financialization of oil * The financialization

389

title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

April 21, 2003 April 21, 2003 April 21, 2003 Bakul Banerjee Bakul Banerjee Project Engineer Project Engineer MOU/SOW MOU/SOW NEU MOU and FY03 SOW are waiting for Mont's signature. SOW NEU MOU and FY03 SOW are waiting for Mont's signature. SOW contains work for three engineers. contains work for three engineers. Princeton FY03 SOW and Caltech FY03 SOW were signed in March. Princeton FY03 SOW and Caltech FY03 SOW were signed in March. Caltech FY03 SOW and MOU will be modified to include T2 Caltech FY03 SOW and MOU will be modified to include T2 operations work after UCSD and UFL MOUs are approved. operations work after UCSD and UFL MOUs are approved. UCDavis UCDavis FY03SOW was signed by Dr. Ko and waiting for FY03SOW was signed by Dr. Ko and waiting for Bauerdick

390

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Watec Resources Canter Watec Resources Canter 1 I EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW AND TRANSPORT AT THE FAULTLESS UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR TEST, CENTRAL NEVADA TEST AREA I prepared by I Karl P o h l m a ~ , Jenny Chapman, Ahmed Hassan, and Charalambos Papelis ! submitted to Nevada Operations M c e U.S. Department of Energy SEPTEMBER 1999 Publication No. 45165 @ C F J C This report uas prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any o f their contractors, subaontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express M implied, or assumes any It@ Liability or responsibility for the accuracy, oompletenesr, or any third party's use or the results of such use of m

391

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

392

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

. . . . . . . 7 AEC ANL ARC BNI W E ERDA FUSRAP HED cm dpm f t g in. m mrem pci Atomic Energy Commission Argonne National Laboratory Albany Research Center Bechtel National, Inc....

393

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TO Distribution Subject EIN: Ohio Hazardous Waste Regulations Copier t o G. R. Galen G. L. Palau F i l e No. 7440124, 135 ate January 10, 1995 Frm D. D. Sexton TDS of ES&H t Oak...

394

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

point (CP), and the h e l i c o p t e r pad were located on lands within the Carson National Forest. The use of these lands f o r the Gasbuggy P r o j e c t was established i...

395

Title:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Chemical Society (2008), 130(4), 1507-1516 Tsapatsis, Michael; Maheshwari, Sudeep; Bates, Frank S.; Koros, William J. Layered zeolite materials and methods related thereto....

396

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Cwmr . lwlales lha mntamhwna from the envlronmant by m d n p a m U layer war the drllng mud p h . . Reducss fulurm mbratbn by diidlng surlsca water hom the drMing mrvl MI....

397

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TAKE- s - United States Department of' h e Interior - - FISH AND WII.,DLIFE SEKWC:E am I I 4600 Kiotrk. Lam, Building C-125 -no, e v a d a 89502-5093 SHL 000036 January 13,...

398

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Primary cosmic radiation consists of '*g&lactic1' particles externally incident on the solar system, and "solar" particles emitted by the sun. This radiation is corposed primarily...

399

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

button next to each profile. STEP 4. Reviews the Worker's JHA and click the Make Changes Button next to each Group or Individual section to update that section. Only the Work...

400

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

ELEV: 7000 ft LAT: 37 54' 00" N LONG: 109 18' 00" w TEMPERATURE (OF)' RAIN (in), WIND SPEED (mph) HEAT COOL AVG MEAN DEG DEG WIND DOM DAY TEMP HIGH TTME LOW TIME DAYS DAYS...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

initiation of explosives occurs by two different mechanisms-either hot spotbased or thermal explosion-based-depending on microstructure. Studies on a large number of explosive...

402

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Departmentaof n e r Washington, DC 20585 IdkY O 3 1993 Mr. James Besl President Force Control Industries 3660 D i x i e Hrghway F a i r f i e l d , Ohio 45014 Dear M r . Besl...

403

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Colorado History Co-sponsored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and Austral Oil Company under the Plowshare Program, Project RULISON was designed to stimulate natural...

404

Title  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

External Developments Division Do financial investors destabilize oil prices? The opinions expressed here are personal and not necessarily shared by the ECB or the Eurosystem...

405

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

R i i e . Tennessee 37831 -8723 J u l y 18, 1995 Mr. Graham H i t c h e l l , Environmental Manager Ohio Envi r o n e n t a l Protection llgency Southwest O I s t r i c t O f f l c...

406

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

I - DOEMr13609-27 a r n w s a r a s w n r m l l f i h l l CNT 000047 A Validation Process for the Groundwater Flow and Transport Model of the Faultless Nuclear Test...

407

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1057 WEST FIREWEED LANE. ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99603. TEL. 1 9 0 1 1 ZS7-5m(l hmmm& S p a d k r s n the Enmonmsm 7 " C W -I Section ... 2 SITE...

408

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REHEDIAL ACTION PROSRAN IW DECOHTMIHATI OH AND DE?OWISSIONING P R O G M (Revision 3, Nowember, 1930) I L - I This p r o t o c o l o u t l i n e s the...

409

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio TO: The F i l e The attached review documents the basis f o r determining whether DOE has a u t h o r i t y f o r t a k i n g remedial a c t i o n a t the BaT Metals f a c i...

410

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

O Distribution pile 10. 7 4 4 0 1 2 4 , 135 s & ; t EIN: Ohio azardous D I C February 6 . 1995 Waste Regulat ions; Empty Container Rule r - D . D. Sexton C-ics lo T. E....

411

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

pub1 i c meetings on the nature o f cleanup measures, waste. management, and waste transportation routes, i n t e r v i e w s and discussions w i t h ARC employees and management,...

412

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

that the Albany rite was contaminated above current pufdelines. An aerial radiological survey conducted In Februuy 1980 did not indicate the presence of ndfoactive contamination i...

413

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of buildings in the northern and central portions of the site; a 0.8-ha (2-acre) biomass research facility (inactive) located south of the site's approximate center; and a...

414

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Survev of the Albany etallurgical Research Center United States Bureau of Wines Biomass Facility and the "Back Forty" Area, Albany, Oregon. DOEEV-000539. June 1983. 4 ....

415

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

in the northern and central sections of the site; an inactive 0.8-ha (2-acre) biomass research facility located at the site's approximate center; and a 5.7-ha (14-acre)...

416

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

site consists of three main areas: ARC proper, the main research facility; the former Biomass Research Facility which consists of approximately O.&ha (2-acre), located wuth of the...

417

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of buildings in the northern and central sections of the site: a 0.8-ha (2-acre) biomass research facility (inactive) located at the site's approximate center; and a 5 . 7 -...

418

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

and central portions of the site; a 0.8-ha (2-acre) area that once contained a biomass research facility (decommissioned) in the southern portion: and an open area...

419

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

e r n m o s t 29 a c r e s of t h e p r o p e r t y : a 2 - a c r e , i n a c t i v e BioMass R e s e a r c h F a c i l i t y , l o c a t e d n e a r t h e c e n t e r of t h e p...

420

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of buildings in the northernmost 12 ha (29 acres) of the site: the .8-ha (2-acre) Biomass Research Facility FIGURE 1-1 PLAN VIEW OF THE ALBANY RESEARCH CENTER FUSRAP 14501...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Path) ARPA-E is currently running four FOAs - three focused and one broad 6 Vehicle Storage + Home Refueling < 2000 Methane Opportunities for Vehicular Energy (MOVE)...

422

title  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee. March 24, 2009. CLO-05-002-RevV. 10. situation with DOD healthcare IT. 11. ...

2013-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

423

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

models, and set a standard process for budget and staffing development to allow some learning curve savings to take place Stop making rules without considering the needs...

424

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rail * Supercapacitor for Load & DG Integration * Flow Battery for T&D Deferral * Flywheel for Area Regulation * Outlook EESAT 2007 - Eyer - DUA 3 Scope * DOE ESS partnership...

425

Title........................  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, subcontractors, or affiliated partners makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at

Larry Brand; In Paper; Larry Brand

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Records Search 5-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

427

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Committee Meeting 3232011 1:16 PM 17 Research Teams Advanced Combustion *Oxy-fuel, Co-firing *Oxy: Materials *USC: Materials *Chemical Looping *Advanced Concepts Advanced...

428

TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CITY/CO{TRIBAL): CITY/CO{TRIBAL): DATE RECEIVED: BRIEF DESCRIPTION: NEPA REVIEWER NEPA DECISION (CX/ EAtEIS) : NHPA ISSUES NEPA/NHPA CONDITIONS: * ENERGY Oak Ridge Office AK-TRIBE-NATIVE VILLAGE OF NELSON LAGOON CO MP LETE 800145422 STATE : AK Tribe Round Two Review: 0 2/8/2010 Energy effiCiency retrofits on the tribal council office building (insulation, vapor barriers, drywall and supplies, T111 sidmg, hardware, paint and primer, and respirators) S.G. Thornton ex CX APPLIED: CX-EEC8G -004 SUBPART D REF 82.5,85.1 None NEPA Compliance Officer (NCO) Review, including consideration of extraordinary circumstances : ~n may be categorically excluded from further NEPA review. I have determined that the proposed action meets the requirements for categorical exclusion in Subpart D, Appendix A or B.

429

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in siting. The specific requirements are: 1. 480V-3Ph-60Hz electrical supply (75 kVA, 90A transformer) 2. Potable water 3. Instrument air: 150 psig 4. Instrument nitrogen: 150 psig...

430

Independent Oversight Inspection, Hanford Site - September 2006 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site - September 2006 Hanford Site - September 2006 Independent Oversight Inspection, Hanford Site - September 2006 September 2006 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health and Emergency Management Programs at the Hanford Site Waste Stabilization and Disposition Project The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance, conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Hanford Site Waste Stabilization and Disposition Project (WSD) during August and September 2006. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. EM senior managers demonstrated that they clearly understand their safety management roles and responsibilities, and are engaged in making safety

431

Hanford ARI Overview | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford ARI Overview Hanford ARI Overview Hanford ARI Overview The Hanford Site provides the opportunity for long-term sustainable energy and industry development. The area boasts a specialized workforce that is highly educated and well-established; is rich in resources including land, infrastructure, low-cost energy, and available workforce; more scientists and engineers per capita than any other area in the Pacific Northwest; and is an optimum location for the development of sustainable energy solutions. Hanford_Asset_Revitalization_Initiative.pdf More Documents & Publications $300,000 Block Grant Awarded to Tri-City Industrial Development Council (TRIDEC) Department of Energy Awards $300,000 to Tri-City Industrial Development Council in Washington State Department of Energy Awards $600,000 to Tri-City Industrial Development

432

Hanford Single-Shell Tank Integrity Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Operations Contract Hanford Single Hanford Single- -Shell Shell Hanford Single Hanford Single Shell Shell Tank Integrity Tank Integrity Program Program Herbert S Berman Herbert S Berman Herbert S. Berman Herbert S. Berman July 29, 2009 July 29, 2009 1 Page 1 Tank Operations Contract Introduction * The Hanford site's principle historic mission was plutonium production for the manufacture of nuclear weapons. * Between 1944 and 1988, the site operated nine graphite- moderated light-water production reactors to irradiate moderated, light-water, production reactors to irradiate fuel and produce plutonium. * Four large chemical separations plants were run to extract plutonium from the fuel, and a variety of laboratories, support facilities, and related infrastructure to support production

433

Senator Murray Visits Hanford | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Senator Murray Visits Hanford Senator Murray Visits Hanford Senator Murray Visits Hanford June 26, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis In this photo, U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) receives an update on activities at C Farm from Office of River Protection (ORP) Manager Kevin Smith, left, and ORP Tank Farms Assistant Manager Tom Fletcher. In this photo, U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) receives an update on activities at C Farm from Office of River Protection (ORP) Manager Kevin Smith, left, and ORP Tank Farms Assistant Manager Tom Fletcher. U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) visited the Hanford site in Washington state recently, where she received an update on activities at C Farm, which is one of the groups of underground waste tanks at Hanford. Murray also toured the site's largest groundwater treatment facility. The 200 West

434

Hanford Patrol Academy demolition sites closure plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hanford Site is owned by the U.S. Government and operated by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office. Westinghouse Hanford Company is a major contractor to the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office and serves as co-operator of the Hanford Patrol Academy Demolition Sites, the unit addressed in this paper. This document consists of a Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Part A Permit Application, Form 3 (Revision 4), and a closure plan for the site. An explanation of the Part A Form 3 submitted with this closure plan is provided at the beginning of the Part A section. This Hanford Patrol Academy Demolition Sites Closure Plan submittal contains information current as of December 15, 1994.

Not Available

1993-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

435

Oversight Reports - Hanford | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 8, 2012 August 8, 2012 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Plutonium Finishing Plant - May 2012 Criticality Safety Information Meeting for the Hanford Plutonium Finishing Plant [HIAR-RL-2012-05-14] July 12, 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site - July 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Employee Concerns Programs May 4, 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - March 2012 Review of the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Construction Quality April 30, 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations

436

DuraLith Alkali-Aluminosilicate Geopolymer Waste Form Testing for Hanford Secondary Waste  

SciTech Connect

The primary objective of the work reported here was to develop additional information regarding the DuraLith alkali aluminosilicate geopolymer as a waste form for liquid secondary waste to support selection of a final waste form for the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant secondary liquid wastes to be disposed in the Integrated Disposal Facility on the Hanford Site. Testing focused on optimizing waste loading, improving waste form performance, and evaluating the robustness of the waste form with respect to waste variability.

Gong, W. L.; Lutz, Werner; Pegg, Ian L.

2011-07-21T23:59:59.000Z

437

Selection of Pretreatment Processes for Removal of Radionuclides from Hanford Tank Waste  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's), Office of River Protection (ORP) located at Hanford Washington has established a contract (1) to design, construct, and commission a new Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) that will treat and immobilize the Hanford tank wastes for ultimate disposal. The WTP is comprised of four major elements, pretreatment, LAW immobilization, HLW immobilization, and balance of plant facilities. This paper describes the technologies selected for pretreatment of the LAW and HLW tank wastes, how these technologies were selected, and identifies the major technology testing activities being conducted to finalize the design of the WTP.

Carreon, R.; Mauss, B. M.; Johnson, M. E.; Holton, L. K.; Wright, G. T.; Peterson, R. A.; Rueter, K. J.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

438

Development of a high-resolution bathymetry dataset for the Columbia River through the Hanford Reach  

SciTech Connect

A bathymetric and topographic data collection and processing effort involving existing and newly collected data has been performed for the Columbia River through the Hanford Reach in central Washington State, extending 60-miles from the tailrace of Priest Rapids Dam (river mile 397) to near the vicinity of the Interstate 182 bridge just upstream of the Yakima River confluence (river mile 337). The contents of this report provide a description of the data collections, data inputs, processing methodology, and final data quality assessment used to develop a comprehensive and continuous merged 1m resolution bathymetric and topographic surface dataset for the Columbia River through the Hanford Reach.

Coleman, Andre M.; Ward, Duane L.; Larson, Kyle B.; Lettrick, Joseph W.

2010-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

439

Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage Of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

retrieved, transferred and Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage Of Hanford Tank Wastes file:I|Data%20Migration%20TaskEIS-0212-FEIS-Summary-1995.html6...

440

National Ignition Facility Title II Design Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This National Ignition Facility (NIF) Title II Design Plan defines the work to be performed by the NIF Project Team between November 1996, when the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reviewed Title I design and authorized the initiation of Title H design and specific long-lead procurements, and September 1998, when Title 11 design will be completed.

Kumpan, S

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

AUTOMATING GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AT HANFORD  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Until this past October, Fluor Hanford managed Hanford's integrated groundwater program for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). With the new contract awards at the Site, however, the CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) has assumed responsibility for the groundwater-monitoring programs at the 586-square-mile reservation in southeastern Washington State. These programs are regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The purpose of monitoring is to track existing groundwater contamination from past practices, as well as other potential contamination that might originate from RCRA treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities. An integral part of the groundwater-monitoring program involves taking samples of the groundwater and measuring the water levels in wells scattered across the site. More than 1,200 wells are sampled each year. Historically, field personnel or 'samplers' have been issued pre-printed forms that have information about the well(s) for a particular sampling evolution. This information is taken from the Hanford Well Information System (HWIS) and the Hanford Environmental Information System (HEIS)--official electronic databases. The samplers used these hardcopy forms to document the groundwater samples and well water-levels. After recording the entries in the field, the samplers turned the forms in at the end of the day and the collected information was posted onto a spreadsheet that was then printed and included in a log book. The log book was then used to make manual entries of the new information into the software application(s) for the HEIS and HWIS databases. This is a pilot project for automating this tedious process by providing an electronic tool for automating water-level measurements and groundwater field-sampling activities. The automation will eliminate the manual forms and associated data entry, improve the accuracy of the information recorded, and enhance the efficiency and sampling capacity of field personnel. The goal of the effort is to eliminate 100 percent of the manual input to the database(s) and replace the management of paperwork by the field and clerical personnel with an almost entirely electronic process. These activities will include the following: scheduling the activities of the field teams, electronically recording water-level measurements, electronically logging and filing Groundwater Sampling Reports (GSR), and transferring field forms into the site-wide Integrated Document Management System (IDMS).

CONNELL CW; HILDEBRAND RD; CONLEY SF; CUNNINGHAM DE

2009-01-16T23:59:59.000Z

442

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability; DOE/EIS-0286: Final Hanford Site Solid Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington (2/13/04)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15 15 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2004 / Notices ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 04, 2003 (68 FR 16511). Draft EISs ERP No. D-AFS-J65397-WY Rating LO, Woodrock Project, Proposal for Timber Sale, Travel Management and Watershed Restoration, Implementation, Bighorn National Forest, Tongue Ranger District, Sheridan County, WY. Summary: EPA has lack of objections to the proposed action based on the predicted overall improvement of forest resource conditions. EPA suggests that the final EIS provide qantification sediment from erosion estimates and monitor water quality and habitat quality in streams. ERP No. D-AFS-K65265-AZ Rating LO, Bar T Bar Anderson Springs Allotment Management Plans to

443

Colloid-Facilitated Cs Transport through Water-Saturated Hanford  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

will be welded. Some Tri-Party Agreement milestones completed in 2002 were related to work on Hanford tanks. #12 paragraphs. Solid waste may originate from work on the Hanford Site or from sources offsite, with contributions from CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc.; S.M. Stoller Corporation; Fluor Hanford, Inc. and its

Flury, Markus

444

Hanford K-Basin Sludge Characterization Overview February 2005  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Hanford K-Basin Sludge Characterization Overview February 2005 1 Hanford K-Basin Sludge Characterization Overview February 2005 1. Summary The Hanford K-East and K-West Basins were used to store of the irradiated fuel reprocessing facility at Hanford (the PUREX facility) the N-Reactor irradiated fuel remained

445

Hanford Laboratories Operation monthly activities report, June 1959  

SciTech Connect

This document provides details of activities of Hanford Laboratories Operation for the month of June 1959.

1959-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

446

Manhattan Project: Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, 1944 OAK RIDGE AND HANFORD COME THROUGH Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, 1944 OAK RIDGE AND HANFORD COME THROUGH (Oak Ridge [Clinton] and Hanford, 1944-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 None of Los Alamos's bomb design work would be of any use if Oak Ridge or Hanford did not come through with enough uranium-235 or plutonium for at least one bomb. Spending on the Manhattan Project reached $100 million per month by mid-1944, yet it was still far from clear that enough of either fissionable substance could be produced before war's end. In the summer of 1944, Oak Ridge's Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant (above) was plagued by operational problems, and the ongoing barrier crisis at the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant threatened to render it useless. At Hanford, the first production reactor had not yet been completed. In addition, officials feared that not enough of the uranium-containing slugs to feed the pile would be available. Even assuming that enough uranium or plutonium could be delivered by Oak Ridge or Hanford, there was no guarantee that the Los Alamos laboratory would be able to design and fabricate weapons in time. Only the most optimistic in the Manhattan Project would have predicted, as Groves did when he met with Marshall in August of 1944, that a bomb or bombs powerful enough to make a difference in the current war would be ready by August 1, 1945.

447

Critical in PROJECT TITLE COMMENTS BPA NPCC  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

is research and development, not capital construction. NPCC staff recommends designation as capital in the Hanford BPA phase 3. Overlaps with study funded by Grant PUD. 250322 250322 198605000 White Sturgeon

448

Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Corporation - September Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 Enforcement Letter, Westinghouse Hanford Corporation - September 22, 1995 September 22, 1995 Issued to Westinghouse Hanford Corporation related to Operational Safety Requirements Implementation at the B Plant/Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility at the Hanford Site This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Westinghouse Hanford Company's (WHC) report of potential noncompliances with the requirements of 10 CFR 830.120 (Quality Assurance Requirements) at the Hanford B Plant/Waste Encapsulation Facility (WESF). These potential noncompliances were identified by WHC on May 8, 1995, during a self-initiated comprehensive assessment of the facilities Operational Safety Requirements (OSR) program

449

DEWATERING TREATMENT SCALE-UP TESTING RESULTS OF HANFORD TANK WASTES  

SciTech Connect

This report documents CH2M HILL Hanford Group Inc. (CH2M HILL) 2007 dryer testing results in Richland, WA at the AMEC Nuclear Ltd., GeoMelt Division (AMEC) Horn Rapids Test Site. It provides a discussion of scope and results to qualify the dryer system as a viable unit-operation in the continuing evaluation of the bulk vitrification process. A 10,000 liter (L) dryer/mixer was tested for supplemental treatment of Hanford tank low-activity wastes, drying and mixing a simulated non-radioactive salt solution with glass forming minerals. Testing validated the full scale equipment for producing dried product similar to smaller scale tests, and qualified the dryer system for a subsequent integrated dryer/vitrification test using the same simulant and glass formers. The dryer system is planned for installation at the Hanford tank farms to dry/mix radioactive waste for final treatment evaluation of the supplemental bulk vitrification process.

TEDESCHI AR

2008-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

450

HEATER TEST PLANNING FOR THE NEAR SURFACE TEST FACILITY AT THE HANFORD RESERVATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Heater Experiment at Hanford. Berkeley, Lawre ;e BerkeleyTest Facility, Hole DC-11, Hanford Reservation. Prepared forof Gable Mountain Basalt Cores, Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

DuBois, A.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

Isotopic Tracking of Hanford 300 Area Derived Uranium in the Columbia River  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

F. ; and Webber, W. D.. Hanford Site Groundwater MonitoringGeochemistry at the Hanford Site. PNNL-17031. 2007. (13)contamination at the Hanford Site in Washington using high-

Christensen, John N.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

Contaminant desorption during long-term leaching of hydroxide-weathered Hanford sediments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

137 in sediments at the Hanford Site, Washington. Environ.during simulated leaks of Hanford waste tanks. Appl.subsurface sediments from the Hanford site, USA. Geochim.

Thompson, A.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Development of A Bayesian Geostatistical Data Assimilation Method and Application to the Hanford 300 Area  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

4.3.1 Hanford 300Area IFRC Site . . . . . . . . . . . .aquifer characterization at the Hanford 300 area 3.14.4 Data Assimilation at the Hanford IFRC

Murakami, Haruko

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Microsoft PowerPoint - 7-03 Suttora Tech Exchange - Hanford Scoping...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Hanford Example Linda Suttora Office of Environmental Compliance DOE-HQ Waste Processing Technical Exchange 2010 Print Close Scoping of the Hanford PA * Reason for new Hanford C...

455

Hanford tank clean up: A guide to understanding the technical issues  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

One of the most difficult technical challenges in cleaning up the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Hanford Site in southeast Washington State will be to process the radioactive and chemically complex waste found in the Site`s 177 underground storage tanks. Solid, liquid, and sludge-like wastes are contained in 149 single- and 28 double-shelled steel tanks. These wastes contain about one half of the curies of radioactivity and mass of hazardous chemicals found on the Hanford Site. Therefore, Hanford cleanup means tank cleanup. Safely removing the waste from the tanks, separating radioactive elements from inert chemicals, and creating a final waste form for disposal will require the use of our nation`s best available technology coupled with scientific advances, and an extraordinary commitment by all involved. The purpose of this guide is to inform the reader about critical issues facing tank cleanup. It is written as an information resource for the general reader as well as the technically trained person wanting to gain a basic understanding about the waste in Hanford`s tanks -- how the waste was created, what is in the waste, how it is stored, and what are the key technical issues facing tank cleanup. Access to information is key to better understanding the issues and more knowledgeably participating in cleanup decisions. This guide provides such information without promoting a given cleanup approach or technology use.

Gephart, R.E.; Lundgren, R.E.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

456

AN INTEGRATED BIOLOGICAL CONTROL SYSTEM AT HANFORD  

SciTech Connect

In 1999 an integrated biological control system was instituted at the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site. Successes and changes to the program needed to be communicated to a large and diverse mix of organizations and individuals. Efforts at communication are directed toward the following: Hanford Contractors (Liquid or Tank Waste, Solid Waste, Environmental Restoration, Science and Technology, Site Infrastructure), General Hanford Employees, and Hanford Advisory Board (Native American Tribes, Environmental Groups, Local Citizens, Washington State and Oregon State regulatory agencies). Communication was done through direct interface meetings, individual communication, where appropriate, and broadly sharing program reports. The objectives of the communication efforts was to have the program well coordinated with Hanford contractors, and to have the program understood well enough that all stakeholders would have confidence in the work performed by the program to reduce or elimated spread of radioactive contamination by biotic vectors. Communication of successes and changes to an integrated biological control system instituted in 1999 at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site have required regular interfaces with not only a diverse group of Hanford contractors (i.e., those responsible for liquid or tank waste, solid wastes, environmental restoration, science and technology, and site infrastructure), and general Hanford employees, but also with a consortium of designated stake holders organized as the Hanford Advisory Board (i.e., Native American tribes, various environmental groups, local citizens, Washington state and Oregon regulatory agencies, etc.). Direct interface meetings, individual communication where appropriate, and transparency of the biological control program were the methods and outcome of this effort.

JOHNSON AR; CAUDILL JG; GIDDINGS RF; RODRIGUEZ JM; ROOS RC; WILDE JW

2010-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

457

Hanford Production Workers Needs Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Needs Assessment for Medical Surveillance of Needs Assessment for Medical Surveillance of Former Hanford Workers Phase I - October 1, 1997 Report Submitted by: University of Washington Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359739 Seattle, WA 98104 October 1, 1997 Authors Scott Barnhart, MD, MPH Principal Investigator Tim Takaro, MD, MPH, MS Co-Principal Investigator Bert Stover, BA Kate Durand, MHS, CIH Bill Trejo, BS Chris Mack, MS Kathy Ertell, MS, CIH Cooperative Agreement # DE-FCO3-96SF21-2581A000 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv List of Figures v Executive Summary vi Introduction 1 II. Methods A. Human Subjects 3 B. Population Identification - Available Databases 3 C. Pending Databases 4 D. Assembly of Master Database 5 E. Estimation of Mortality 6 F. Estimation of Exposure* 6 C. Estimate of Need of Medical Surveillance

458

Hanford Production Workers Needs Assessment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Medical Surveillance of Medical Surveillance of Former Hanford Workers Phase I - October 1, 1997 Report Submitted by: University of Washington Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359739 Seattle, WA 98104 October 1, 1997 Authors Scott Barnhart, MD, MPH Principal Investigator Tim Takaro, MD, MPH, MS Co-Principal Investigator Bert Stover, BA Kate Durand, MHS, CIH Bill Trejo, BS Chris Mack, MS Kathy Ertell, MS, CIH Cooperative Agreement # DE-FCO3-96SF21-2581A000 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv List of Figures v Executive Summary vi Introduction 1 II. Methods A. Human Subjects 3 B. Population Identification - Available Databases 3 C. Pending Databases 4 D. Assembly of Master Database 5 E. Estimation of Mortality 6 F. Estimation of Exposure* 6 C. Estimate of Need of Medical Surveillance

459

Hanford Construction Workers Needs Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION WORKES AT HANFORD: A NEEDS ASSESSMENT Submitted by Center to Protect Workers' Rights on behalf of The Building and Construction Trades Dept., AFL-CIO and The Central Washington Building and Construction Trades Council In cooperation with United Brotherhood of Carpenters University of Cincinnati Occupational Health Foundation George Washington University Zenith Administrators, Inc. Duke University July 1, 1997 Table bt Cóütn 1. Introduction and Background a. Specific Aims b. Rationale for Program 2. Need for Establishing Medical Evaluation and Notification a. Medical Surveillance b. History of Site c. Special Issues for Construction Workers 3. Size of Construction Workers' Population (Since 1943) a. Crude Estimate of Population Size b. Population Before 1950 c. Population After 1950

460

Hanford cultural resources management plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As a federal agency, the US Department of Energy (DOE) has been directed by Congress and the President to provide leadership in the preservation of prehistoric, historical, and cultural resources on lands it administers, to manage these in a spirit of stewardship for future generations, and to protect and preserve the rights of Native Americans to religious freedom. The purpose of this document is to describe how the DOE-Richland Operations (DOE-RL) will meet those responsibilities on the Hanford Site, pursuant to guidelines for Agency Responsibilities under the Historic Preservation Act (FR 53:31, February 17, 1988). This document is intended for multiple uses. Among other things, the text is designed as a manual for cultural resource managers to follow and as an explanation of the process of cultural resource regulatory compliance for the DOE-RL and Site contractors. 10 refs., 17 figs., 11 tabs.

Chatters, J.C. (ed.)

1989-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Office of River Protection (Hanford) - Enforcement Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Enforcement Documents Enforcement Documents Office of River Protection (Hanford) Enforcement Letter issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, related to a positive Unreviewed Safety Question involving the Tank Farm Waste Transfer System at the Hanford Site, (NEL-2012-01) February 28, 2012 Consent Order issued to Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC related to deficiencies in the corrective action management program, radiation control program, and sealed radioactive source accountability and control program (NCO-2011-01) May 27, 2011 Consent Order issued to Bechtel National, Inc. for Deficiencies in Vendor Commercial Grade Dedication Processes at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project (NCO-2010-03) September 22, 2010 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Bechtel National, Inc., related to Deficiencies at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford Site, December 3, 2008 (NEA-2008-04)

462

Hanford Laboratories monthly activities report, March 1963  

SciTech Connect

This is the monthly report for the Hanford Laboratories Operation March 1963. Reactor fuels, chemistry, dosimetry, separation processes, reactor technology, financial activities, biology operation, physics and instrumentation research, operations research and synthesis, programming, and radiation protection operation are discussed.

1963-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

463

Hanford Laboratories monthly activities report, March 1964  

SciTech Connect

The monthly report for the Hanford Laboratories Operation, March 1964. Reactor fuels, chemistry, dosimetry, separation processes, reactor technology, financial activities, biology operation, and physics and instrumentation research, and applied mathematics operation, and programming operations are discussed.

1964-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

464

Hanford Laboratories monthly activities report, October 1963  

SciTech Connect

This is the monthly report for the Hanford Laboratories Operation, October 1963. Metallurgy, reactor fuels, chemistry, dosimetry, separation processes, reactor technology, financial activities, visits, biology operation, physics and instrumentation research, and employee relations are discussed.

1963-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

465

Hanford Laboratories monthly activities report, September 1963  

SciTech Connect

This is the monthly report for the Hanford Laboratories Operation, September 1963. Metallurgy, reactor fuels, chemistry, dosimetry, separation processes, reactor technology, financial activities, visits, biology operation, physics and instrumentation research, and employee relations are discussed.

1963-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

466

Hanford Laboratories monthly activities report, August 1963  

SciTech Connect

This is the monthly report for the Hanford Laboratories Operation, August 1963. Metallurgy, reactor fuels, chemistry, dosimetry, separation processes, reactor technology, financial activities, visits, biology operation, physics and instrumentation research, and employee relations are discussed.

1963-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

467

Hanford Laboratories monthly activities report, June 1963  

SciTech Connect

This is the monthly report for the Hanford Laboratories Operation, June 1963. Metallurgy, reactor fuels, chemistry, dosimetry, separation processes, reactor technology, financial activities, visits, biology operation, physics and instrumentation research, and employee relations are discussed.

1963-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

468

Hanford Laboratories monthly activities report, April 1964  

SciTech Connect

This is the monthly report for the Hanford Laboratories Operation, April 1964. Reactor fuels, chemistry, dosimetry, separation processes, reactor technology, financial activities, biology operation, physics and instrumentation research, applied mathematics, programming operation, and radiation protection are discussed.

1964-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

469

Hanford Activity Report for Specific Administrative Controls...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on its Participation in a Review of Selected Aspects of Nuclear Safety at the Hanford Site Tank Farms, December 6-10, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy Office of...

470

List of currently classified documents relative to Hanford Operations and of potential use in the Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment, January 1, 1973--June 20, 1994  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment (CRCIA) Project seeks to estimate the current risk from the Columbia River resulting from past and present Hanford activities. To resolve the question of the current risk, it is necessary for the CRCIA Project to have access to any classified information that may be relevant to this study. The purpose of this report is to present the results of the search for relevant classified information. There are two classified matter control centers operated by two prime contractors at the Hanford Site. One is operated by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) and the other is operated by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). Only the WHC collection contained information relevant to a study of the Columbia River in the time frame of interest: January 1, 1973 through June 20, 1994. A list of the classified documents in the WHC collection is maintained in the WHC Classified Document Control database. The WHC Classified Document Control database was searched. The search criteria were the dates of interest and the basic keywords used for the CRCIA Project`s data compendium (Eslinger et al. 1994). All Hanford-generated, Hanford-related entries that were applicable to the CRCIA Project and the dates of interest were provided. The resulting list of 477 titles comprises the Appendix of this report. The information give for each title is exactly as it appears in the database. Any inconsistencies are the result of duplicating the database.

Miley, T.B.; Huesties, L.R.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Microsoft Word - 34009 Final Report Title Page 23-Jun-08  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

practical significance are high-porosity unconsolidated sands encased in unconsolidated shale. The configurations and spatial distributions of course may vary. The physics-based...

472

First Chapter of Hanford Story Released | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter of Hanford Story Released Chapter of Hanford Story Released First Chapter of Hanford Story Released April 20, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree, DOE (509) 376-4171 Geoff_Tyree@rl.gov RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy is releasing the first chapter of "The Hanford Story" to the public. The Hanford Story is a multimedia presentation that provides an overview of the Hanford Site-its history, today's cleanup activities, and a glimpse into the possibilities of future uses of the 586-square-mile government site in southeast Washington State. The 17-minute video has been posted to the site's YouTube Channel on www.youtube.com/hanfordsite, as well as the Department of Energy's Hanford website on www.hanford.gov. The Hanford Story will be delivered in a series of video-based chapters

473

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project. Monthly report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project is to estimate the radiation doses that individuals and populations could have received from nuclear operations at Hanford since 1944. The independent Technical Steering Panel (TSP) provides technical direction. The project is divided into the following technical tasks. These tasks correspond to the path radionuclides followed from release to impact on humans (dose estimates):Source Terms, Environmental Transport, Environmental Monitoring Data, Demography, Food Consumption, and Agriculture, and Environmental Pathways and Dose Estimates.

Cannon, S.D.; Finch, S.M. [comps.

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

474

Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project. Monthly report  

SciTech Connect

The objective of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project is to estimate the radiation doses that individuals and populations could have received from nuclear operations at Hanford since 1944. The project is divided into the following technical tasks. These tasks correspond to the path radionuclides followed, from release to impact on humans (dose estimates): Source terms, environmental transport, environmental monitoring data, demography, food consumption, and agriculture, and environmental pathways and dose estimates.

Finch, S.M.; McMakin, A.H. [comps.

1992-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

G Subject: Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I, Title II, and Title III, and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113- References: Consolidated and Further Continuing...

476

Special Report Order, Issued to CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc.- October 22, 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Issued to CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., related to Multiple Nuclear Safety Issues at the Hanford Site

477

Enforcement Letter, Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., H5-20- July 7, 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Issued to Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., related to Potential Quality Assurance Rule Violations at the Hanford Site

478

Design review report for multiport riser final design review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This design review examined the design documents contained in a notebook prepared for the final design review of the multiport riser assembly. This assembly will support the Hydrogen Mitigation Test program for mitigation of safety issues for Hanford Waste Tank 241-SY-101. The purpose of the Multiport Riser is to provide multiple access ports of several diameters in a single 42 inch riser for simultaneous access of test and support equipment. The notebook was titled: {open_quotes}Multiport Riser Final Design Review.{close_quotes} The review was conducted using a database comment registration system whereby the reviewer comments were entered into the database and each comment was given a unique identifier. During the review, each comment was referred to by its identifier. Changes to comments, responses, and actions needed were made with the agreement of the committee and the reviewers at the formal design review meeting held March 1, 1994. When the structural analyses were available, they were distributed for review which allowed closure of all design review comments. Approval of the design was achieved and supporting documents are included in this report.

McWethy, L.M.; Sheen, E.M.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

Radionuclide air emission report for the Hanford Site Calendar Year 1993  

SciTech Connect

This report documents radionuclide air emissions from the Hanford Site in 1993 and the resulting effective dose equivalent to any member of the public. The report has been prepared and will be submitted in accordance with reporting requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, {open_quotes}National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants,{close_quotes} Subpart H, {open_quotes}National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities.{close_quotes}

Diediker, L.P.; Curn, B.L. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Rhoads, K.; Damberg, E.G.; Soldat, J.K.; Jette, S.J. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes, Hanford  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes, Hanford Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington; Record of Decision (ROO). This Record of Decision has been prepared pursuant to the Council on Environme~tal Quality ~egulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Pol icy Act (NEPAl (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and the Department of Energy NEPA Guidelines (52 FR 47662, December 15, 1987). It is based on DOE's "Environmental Impact Statement for the Oi sposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes'' (OOE/EIS-0113) and consideration of ~11 public and agency comments received on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). fJECISION The decision is to implement the ''Preferred Alternative'' as discussed in

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "title final hanford" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Hanford science and technology needs statements document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is a compilation of the Hanford science and technology needs statements for FY 1998. The needs were developed by the Hanford Site Technology Coordination Group (STCG) with full participation and endorsement of site user organizations, stakeholders, and regulators. The purpose of this document is to: (a) provide a comprehensive listing of Hanford science and technology needs, and (b) identify partnering and commercialization opportunities with industry, other federal and state agencies, and the academic community. The Hanford STCG reviews and updates the needs annually. Once completed, the needs are communicated to DOE for use in the development and prioritization of their science and technology programs, including the Focus Areas, Cross-Cutting Programs, and the Environmental Management Science Program. The needs are also transmitted to DOE through the Accelerating Cleanup: 2006 Plan. The public may access the need statements on the Internet on: the Hanford Home Page (www.hanford.gov), the Pacific Rim Enterprise Center`s web site (www2.pacific-rim.org/pacific rim), or the STCG web site at DOE headquarters (em-52.em.doegov/ifd/stcg/stcg.htm). This page includes links to science and technology needs for many DOE sites. Private industry is encouraged to review the need statements and contact the Hanford STCG if they can provide technologies that meet these needs. On-site points of contact are included at the ends of each need statement. The Pacific Rim Enterprise Center (206-224-9934) can also provide assistance to businesses interested in marketing technologies to the DOE.

Piper, L.L.

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

482

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SHEET SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor (DOE/EIS-0250F-S2D; the Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS), and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (DOE/EIS-0369D; the Rail Alignment EIS) CONTACTS: For more information about this document, write or call: For general information on the DOE NEPA process, write or call: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

483

Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4t 3 4t 3 l I Project lnfonnatlon Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date: 11-22-2010 DOE Code: 673()-()20-51141 Contractor Code: 8067-778 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. The purpose of the project is to test a tool that temporarily reduces the viscosity of oil which allows it to be 1. Brief project description ~nclude pumped through pipelines easier. The test will require about 4 miles of line to pump the oil through after anything that could impact the treatment (hence the need to connect the 31oops together), a holding volume for recovery, then repeat. environmenJ] There will be tanks to hold the original volume, tanks to receive the volume after treatment and pumping 2. Legal location through the line, possible transfer between tanks, transport (trucking) of the oil to the site (by the COC) and

484

Control Measure Title Reference Number *  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

exhaustive search for emissions reductions to use in meeting federal Clean Air Act requirements for this 2008 PM2.5 Plan. Chapter 6 details the Districts process for developing control measures for reducing emissions of primary PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors. This Appendix presents the product of this process: a master list of all candidate control measure ideas identified and evaluated for this plan. After assembling Appendix I, the District then screened the candidate measures into several categories: high priority measures to be implemented in the years immediately following plan adoption; measures that might be implemented in future years to allow for expected technology development; and those measures that require further study to identify when they could be implemented and what reductions they could achieve. Candidate control measure descriptions in Appendix I have the following major components:! Title and Number

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

Hanford Grows Young Minds Through Site Tours | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Grows Young Minds Through Site Tours Hanford Grows Young Minds Through Site Tours Hanford Grows Young Minds Through Site Tours June 3, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis John Britton, with Office of River Protection contractor Washington River Protection Solutions, explains the Hanford tank waste program to Western Washington University students in a recent tour of the Hanford site. John Britton, with Office of River Protection contractor Washington River Protection Solutions, explains the Hanford tank waste program to Western Washington University students in a recent tour of the Hanford site. RICHLAND, Wash. - It is harvest season for cherries, raspberries and rhubarb in Washington state. But employees at the Hanford site are helping grow the young minds of the nation's future science, technology,

486

DOE Cites Washington Closure Hanford for Safety Violations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Department of Energy issues a Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) to contractor Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) for violations of DOE's worker safety and health program regulations in 2009 at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State.

487

Operational Awarness at Hanford Tank Farms, April 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR-HANFORD-2013-04-15 Site: Hanford - Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of...

488

Fourth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public Fourth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public February 15, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Carrie Meyer, DOE, (509) 372-0810...

489

Local Scouts Train with Hanford Safety Experts - 52 Boy Scouts...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Local Scouts Train with Hanford Safety Experts - 52 Boy Scouts Earn Merit Badges at the HAMMER Training Facility Local Scouts Train with Hanford Safety Experts - 52 Boy Scouts Earn...

490

Hanford Cr | VIMSS - Virtual Institute for Microbial Stress and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

reactor building HCB (Visit Website) Hanford Chromium Bioremediation Field Investigations of Lactate-Stimulated Bioreduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) at Hanford 100H. The objective of...

491

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08 08 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor DOE/EIS-0250F-S2 and Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada DOE/EIS-0369 Volume VI Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS and Rail Alignment EIS Comment-Response Documents U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management June 2008 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada -