Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Automotive advertising copy test. Final report. [Mileage estimates  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this research project was to explore the following issues: (1) mileage recall/recognition of miles per gallon/highway mileage estimates in print ads by advertisement readers; (2) determine consumer expectations and believability of advertised mileage guidelines; (3) measure recall/comprehension of mileage disclaimers; and (4) determine how consumers utilize published mileage estimates. The evidence from this study points to a public which is quite familiar with the EPA mileage estimates, in terms of using them as guidelines and in finding them to be helpful. Most adults also appear to be knowledgeable about factors which can affect car performance and, therefore, anticipate that, within certain tolerances, their actual mileage will differ from the EPA estimates. Although the consumer has been educated regarding fuel estimates, there is a very strong suggestion from this research that typical automobile print advertising does a less than an effective job in generating awareness of specific EPA estimates as well as their attendant disclaimer. Copy strategy and execution have a critical impact on recall of the EPA mileage estimates. 18 tables.

Not Available

1984-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

2

Advanced Vehicle Testing - Beginning-of-Test Battery Testing...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2.5 V Thermal Mgmt.: Passive, Vacuum-Sealed Unit Pack Weight: 294 kg BATTERY LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Vehicle Mileage and Testing Date Vehicle Odometer: 6,696 mi Date of...

3

2013 Chevrolet Volt - VIN 3929 - Advanced Vehicle Testing - Beginning...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Voltage 3 : 3.00 V Thermal Management: Active - Liquid cooled BATTERY LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Vehicle Mileage and Testing Date Vehicle Odometer: 4,007 mi Date of...

4

2011 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid - vin 3539 Advanced Vehicle Testing...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pack Capacity: 5.3 Ah Cooling: ActiveCabin Air Pack Weight: 96 lb BATTERY LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Vehicle Mileage and Testing Date Vehicle Odometer: 5,730 mi Date of...

5

HEV Fleet Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activities - 2010...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity Maintenance Sheet for 2010 Ford Fusion VIN 3FADP0L32AR194699 Date Mileage Description Cost 1012009 5915 Changed oil and filter 28.77...

6

Fleet Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activities - 2010 Honda...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Vehicle Testing Activity Maintenance Sheet for 2010 Honda Insight LX VIN JHMZE2H59AS011748 HEV Fleet Testing Date Mileage Description Cost 842009 5,752 Changed oil and filter...

7

Gas Mileage Tips - Mobile  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Gas Mileage Tips Gas Mileage Tips Drive sensibly Agressive Driver Save 5% to 33% by avoiding speeding and aggressive accelerating and braking. Save: $0.16-$1.07 per gallon Obey the speed limit 65 mph sign Each 5 mph you drive over 50 mph can lower gas mileage by 7% or more. Save: $0.23-$0.45 per gallon Keep your engine properly tuned Man and woman looking under hood Fixing an out-of-tune engine can improve its efficiency by 4% on average. Save: $0.13 per gallon Keep tires properly inflated Woman checking tire pressure Under-inflated tires can lower gas mileage by 0.3% for every 1 psi drop in pressure of all four tires. Save: Up to $0.10 per gallon Remove un-needed cargo Woman shopping for a car An extra 50 to 100 pounds can lower gas mileage by about 1% to 2%. Save: $0.03-$0.06 per gallon

8

DATE: NVLAP LAB CODE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY TESTING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DATE: NVLAP LAB CODE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY TESTING TEST METHOD SELECTION LIST ­ CRYPTOGRAPHIC AND SECURITY TESTING NVLAP CRYPTOGRAPHIC AND SECURITY TESTING APPLICATION FORM (REV. 2013 and Security (BCS)" testing and is considered the foundation of all scopes of accreditation

9

DATE: NVLAP LAB CODE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY TESTING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DATE: NVLAP LAB CODE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY TESTING TEST PROCEDURE SELECTION LIST ­ HEALTHCARE IT TESTING NVLAP HEALTHCARE IT TESTING APPLICATION (2013-01-02) PAGE 1 OF 3 Instructions: Please check the method for which you are requesting accreditation. NVLAP Code Test Procedure Description 2011

10

DATE: __________________ NVLAP LAB CODE: _________________ Test Method  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

_____ 30/DISC00A ANSI/INCITS 423.1 (2008) Information Technology - Conformance Testing Methodology Standard _____ 30/DISC01A ANSI/INCITS 423.2 (2008) Information Technology - Conformance Testing Methodology Standard - Part 2: Finger minutiae data _____ 30/DISC03A ANSI/INCITS 423.3 (2009) Information Technology

11

Gas Mileage Tips - Driving More Efficiently  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Driving More Efficiently Driving More Efficiently Personalize Fuel Prices Select the fuel type and enter your fuel price to personalize savings estimates. Regular Midgrade Premium Diesel E85 CNG LPG $ 3.33 /gal Save My Prices Use Default Prices Click "Save My Prices" to apply your prices to other pages, or click "Use Default Prices" use national average prices. Drive Sensibly frustrated driver Aggressive driving (speeding, rapid acceleration and braking) wastes gas. It can lower your gas mileage by 33% at highway speeds and by 5% around town. Sensible driving is also safer for you and others, so you may save more than gas money. Fuel Economy Benefit: 5%-33% Equivalent Gasoline Savings: $0.17-$1.10/gallon Observe the Speed Limit (New Information) Graph showing MPG decreases rapidly at speeds above 50 mph

12

Boise State University Automobile Use Mileage Log (Documentation for Business Miles)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Boise State University Automobile Use Mileage Log (Documentation for Business Miles) Rev. 03 University Automobile Use Mileage Log (Documentation for Business Miles) Rev. 03/10 PAGE ____ (IF YOU NEED

Barrash, Warren

13

DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy has published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the compliance date for the dehumidifier test procedure.

14

Dates  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Dates Dates Nature Bulletin No. 511-A December 15, 1973 Forest Preserve District of Cook County George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Supt. of Conservation DATES When the wise men from the east, guided by a mysterious new star, traveled to Jerusalem and thence to Bethlehem where they worshipped the infant Jesus and presented Him with gifts, you can be sure that, in addition to gold and frankincense and myrrh, they carried dates as food to sustain them on their long journey. The Date Palm had been cultivated along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers since the time of the Sumerians, 3000 years before the birth of Christ. This tree, like the coconut palm, is unknown today in its wild state but is believed to have originated in Ethiopia. In early times it was abundant in Palestine and the scientific name, Phoenix, given to the date palm by the Greeks, may be due to the fact that they first saw it in Phoenicia. The "tree of life, " variously referred to in the Bible, was probably this palm.

15

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE: DATE: AUG 12 1991 REPLY TO ATTN OF: EM-421 (J. Wagoner, 3-8147) SUBIECT: Elimination of the Duriron Company Site TO: The File I have reviewed the attached site summary and elimination recommendation for the Duriron Company Site in Dayton, Ohio. I have determined that there is little likelihood of radioactive contamination at this site. Based on the above, the Ouriron Company Site is hereby eliminated from further consideration under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. W. Ale~ander~illiams,~PhD Designation and Certification Manager Off-Site Branch Division of Eastern Area Programs Office of Environmental Restoration Attachment -: bee: Weston EM-40 (2) P. Hevner Review: - OTS NOTE DATE: July 15, 1991 TO: Alexander WiTliams FROM: Dan Stou tF

16

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 DATE: April 25, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) - Public Access SUMMARY: On April 15, 2011, the public side of the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) website was launched. This means that information posted to FAPIIS on and after this date, with the exception of past performance reviews, will be accessible by the public. Public access to information posted to FAPIIS prior to April 15, 2011, will be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process. (See paragraph (b)(3) of

17

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) uses the Naval Reactors (NR) Casks to transport test trains between the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF) Expended Core Facility and the ATR. The...

18

HEV Fleet Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activities - 2010...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DU5A0006063 Date Mileage Description Cost 8192009 5,090 Changed oil and filter and rotated tires 39.28 9162009 14,484 Changed oil and filter and replaced flat tire 152.58 10...

19

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-RL5- DATE: September 13, 1990 TO: Alexander Williams (w 39 fusrap6 I FROM: Ed Mitchellzm SUBJECT: Elimination Recommendation for American Machine and Foundry in New York City The purpose of this note is to provide the following with respect to the former American Machine and Foundry Company (AMF) in New York City, New York--FUSRAP Considered Site Recommendation (g/13/90). 1 he recommendation is to eliminate the AMF New York City sites. If you agree, then please return an "approved" and dated copy of this note. Upon receipt of it, we will update the Considered-Sites Data Base for FUSRAP of DOE's intent to eliminate the site. Please call me at 353-1281 if you have +ny questions. cc: J. Wagoner D. Tonkay file FUSRAP NY.59 -------------------------------~---------------------------

20

1. What are positive economical impacts of improving the fuel mileage standards? 2. What is the current fuel mileage standard for the United States?  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Bowen's money saved = $1091 * 0.90 = $982 A4. Assumptions: Fuel Price is $2.00 per gallon Fuel cost1. What are positive economical impacts of improving the fuel mileage standards? 2. What is the current fuel mileage standard for the United States? 3. If Dr Bowen rides his bike 90% of the year, how

Bowen, James D.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 DATE: May 12, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter AL 2011-05/Financial Acquisition Letter FAL 2011-01 Congressional Notification of Pending Award of a Contract Action, Announcement of Selected Applications for Negotiation of Financial Assistance Awards, or to Award a Financial Assistance Action in excess of $1 Million SUMMARY: AL 2011-05/FAL 2011-01 (AL/FAL) implements statutory and non-statutory Congressional notification of pending award of a contract action, announcement of selected applications for negotiation of financial assistance awards, or to award a financial assistance

22

Date  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2009 3, 2009 Tim Meeks, Administrator Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228-8213 Dear Administrator Meeks: East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (East River) offers this letter as comment to the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) Federal Register Notice (FRN), (dated March 4, 2009, pp.9392-9393) concerning implementation of Western's new transmission loan or construction authority. East River is a wholesale electric power supply cooperative which provides twenty rural electric cooperatives and one municipal electric system transmission and power supply services. These twenty-one non-profit retail electric providers, which collectively own East River, serve about 90,000 residential, commercial

23

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 SECTION A. Project Title: Smoking Shelters SECTION B. Project Description. Install up to three prefabricated outdoor shelters for smokers. Design and install a shelter base so that shelters can be movable. The base shall be designed to prevent shelters from moving or tipping over due to high winds. Specific location for shelters is to be determined, but the shelter bases will be placed atop existing concrete or asphalt such that no subsurface soil disturbance is expected. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact none SECTION D. Determine the Level of Environmental Review (or Documentation) and Reference(s): Identify the applicable categorical exclusion from 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B, give the appropriate justification, and the approval date..

24

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-45 3-45 DATE: April 16, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 15.1 Source Selection Guide SUMMARY: Attached is a revised Source Selection Guide. The Guide has been updated to reflect changes to DOE policies and practices and includes new topics such as Flow of the Source Selection Process, Source Selection Official Designation, Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest Certificates, Source Selection Training and Roles and Responsibilities. This Flash and its attachments will be available online within a day, at the following website: http://energy.gov/management/office-management/operational-

25

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 SECTION A. Project Title: Smoking Shelters SECTION B. Project Description. Install up to three prefabricated outdoor shelters for smokers. Design and install a shelter base so that shelters can be movable. The base shall be designed to prevent shelters from moving or tipping over due to high winds. Specific location for shelters is to be determined, but the shelter bases will be placed atop existing concrete or asphalt such that no subsurface soil disturbance is expected. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact none SECTION D. Determine the Level of Environmental Review (or Documentation) and Reference(s): Identify the applicable categorical exclusion from 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B, give the appropriate justification, and the approval date..

26

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 61 DATE: June 19, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 and How It Affects Federal Employee Non-Disclosure Policies, Forms, Certificates, Agreements and Acknowledgments SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-05 provide Contracting Officers with notice of the recently passed, Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 (WPEA), Pub.L. 112- 199, and the DOECAST issued in response on April 24, 2013. This AL/FAL informs DOE/NNSA Contracting Officers to update any Non-Disclosure Policies, Forms, Certificates, Agreements, and Acknowledgements

27

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

a? a? ,itbd States Government memorandum Department of Energy DATE: APR 15 893 REPLY TO EM-421 (W. Williams, 903-8149) ATTN OF: Authorization for Remedial Action at the Former Associate Aircraft Site in SUBJECT: Fairfield, Ohio TO: W. Seay, DOE Oak Ridge Field Office The former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing, Inc., site at 3660 Dixie Highway, Fairfield, Ohio, is designated for remedial action under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Force Control Industries is the current occupant of the site. This designation is based on the results of radiological surveys and conclusions from an authority review. Copies of the radiological survey reports and the authority review are provided for information. The site has been assigned a low priority under the FUSRAP protocol. The

28

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POLICY FLASH 2011-96 POLICY FLASH 2011-96 DATE: August 19, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: RFP Section H Clause Templates SUMMARY: On May 3, 2011, twenty two draft Section H clause templates were distributed for Procurement Director (PD), Head of Contracting Activity (HCA), General Counsel and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) review and comment. All comments received were considered and changes were made as appropriate including the elimination of six clauses. The final version of the sixteen RFP Section H clause templates identified below will be available in STRIPES. 1) COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNET PROTOCOL VERSION 6 (IPV6) IN ACQUIRING

29

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 DATE: April 25, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division B, Title I, Section 1101(a)(2) of the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter 2011-04 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Section 1101(a)(2) of the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, Pub. L. 112-10 (hereinafter "Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011). Section 1101(a)(2) of the Act provides that, unless otherwise specified, the authority and conditions provided for projects or activities (including the costs of direct loans and loan guarantees) appropriated, authorized, or

30

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

53 53 DATE: May 15, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6 SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-06 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-04 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6. The AL addresses the following: Appropriations Act Section 301(a) Unfunded Requests for Proposals

31

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POLICY FLASH 2013-12 POLICY FLASH 2013-12 DATE: December 7, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: Section 301(b) Congressional Notification of Multi-year Contract Award Report Revision for Fiscal Year 2013 SUMMARY: With reference to Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-02 regarding Section 301(b) Congressional Notification of Multi-year Contract Award, the spreadsheet is revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 reporting. The revised spreadsheet will now have 5 funding columns that must be filled in for each 301(b) notification instead of 4 columns. The amounts in columns I through L should equal to the

32

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2- 36 2- 36 DATE: April 23, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No.112- 74 and Related Conference Report SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-01 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No.112-74 and Related Conference Report. The AL addresses the following: Appropriations Act * Section 301(a) Unfunded Requests for Proposals

33

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22 22 DATE: February 1, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter AL 2012-07/Financial Acquisition Letter FAL 2012-01 Congressional Notification of Pending Award of a Contract Action, Announcement of Selected Applications for Negotiation of Financial Assistance Awards, or to Award a Financial Assistance Action in Excess of $1 Million SUMMARY: AL 2012-07/FAL 2012-01 (AL/FAL) implements statutory Congressional notification of pending award of a contract action, announcement of selected applications for negotiation of financial assistance awards, or to award a financial assistance action in excess of $1 million. The total value of the award includes options, budget periods and cost share. The

34

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 SECTION A. Project Title: Relocation of National and Homeland Security New Generation Wireless Test Bed Equipment and Personnel SECTION B. Project Description: This activity is to relocate and consolidate Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) National and Homeland Security (NHS) New Generation Wireless Test Bed (NGWTB) program personnel and equipment from Critical Infrastructure Test Range Complex (CITRC) to Central Facilitis Area (CFA). This activity also includes relocating the antenna field from vicinity Power Burst Facility (PBF)-641 to the vicinity of PBF-620 Cell Site 9 area. The Remote Testing Monitoring Facility will be relocated from the vicinity of Gate 3 to the Cell Site 9 area. The Cell Site 9 area near PBF-620 is previously disturbed soil and asphalt.

35

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 SECTION A. Project Title: Test Reactor Cask Implementation. SECTION B. Project Description: This proposed action is a process and facility modification. Background / Purpose & Need The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) uses the Naval Reactors (NR) Casks to transport test trains between the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF) Expended Core Facility and the ATR. The Naval Reactor (NR) Casks, however, are approaching the end of their design life. In 1997, Bettis initiated a contract for construction of the NR Cask replacement, the Test Reactor Cask (TRC). The TRC is a revised and updated design of the NR cask and will be more robust structurally and provide more shielding than the current NR Casks. Construction of two TRCs is nearly finished and the INL must now modify the ATR facility and update ATR safety

36

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OOE F 1325.3 OOE F 1325.3 m e m o randum DATE: SEP 23 1988 Department of Energy IL_. 9 REPLY TO AlTN OF, NE-23 SUElJECT. Owner Searches for Potential Sites in Chicago IL, (7 TO: W . Cottrell, ORNL 0. Kozlouski, OTS W h ile in Chicago, Illinois, on September 13, 14, and 15, 1988, I drove to the suspected addresses of several potential FUSRAP sites. No owners were contacted during this activity because most of the work was done after normal working hours or while on the way to the airport when tim e would not permit the visit. I .?I ' - Former C-B Tool Products Co. 956 E. 58th Street Chicago, Illinois The University of Chicago Ingleside Hall is located at this address. It is the University O ffice of Employment and contains a U.S. Post O ffice. The structure is several stories and looks like it may have existed in the

37

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

42 42 SECTION A. Project Title: Innovative Manufacturing Process for Improving the Erosion/Corrosion Resistance of Power Plant Components via Powder Metallurgy & Hot Isostatic Processing Methods - Electric Power Research Institute SECTION B. Project Description The objective of this project is to conduct the necessary design, processing, manufacturing, and validation studies to assess powder metallurgy/hot isostatic processing (PM/HIP) as a method to produce very large near-net shaped (NNS) components with erosion/corrosion resistant surfaces for use in nuclear and electrical power generation equipment. * Project tasks include the following: * Modeling of NNS Component Alloy & Mold/Can design * Test coupon development, demonstration, and screening for surface applications

38

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09-003 09-003 SECTION A. Project Title: Removal of Central Facilities Area (CFA)-661 Interior Walls and Mezzanine. SECTION B. Project Description The initial action to be covered under this Environmental Checklist will be removal of the mezzanines from CFA-661 to provide for material storage and work space for the National and Homeland Security (N&HS) Wireless Test Bed project. More specifically, this involves storage of electronic equipment, antennas and antenna masts, personnel supplies, and a variety of spare parts to support the project. In addition to storage, plans include a staging and lay down area where partial assembly of project equipment can be performed. Following completion of N&HS work within CFA-661, Facilities and Site Services will then remove the interior walls.

39

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-653 HVAC Modifications SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project plans to replace the existing blowers, swamp coolers and electric heaters in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Test Reactor Area-653 (TRA-653) office area with three roof mounted heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and install six roof mounted HVAC units at the TRA-653 machine shop area. These modifications are needed to enhance workplace habitability, maintain a more consistent building environment, and achieve a more energy efficient system. The TRA- 653 machine shop currently uses portable swamp coolers to cool their shop. TRA-653 is eligible for the National Historic Register, however, the activity as described is exempt from cultural resource review (INL Cultural Resource Management Plan;

40

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-003 SECTION A. Project Title: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers. SECTION B. Project Description The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers project will be conducted at both the Raft River hydrothermal site in South Central Idaho and at the INL Research Center in Idaho Falls. The purpose of this work is to characterize tracers and test these tracers at the Raft River project through use of tracers and methods under realistic conditions. INL researchers will use an existing commercial hydrothermal site at Raft River that is currently operated by U.S. Geothermal, Inc. (USG), with whom INL has established a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) partnership. Numerous wells have previously been

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-003 SECTION A. Project Title: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers. SECTION B. Project Description The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers project will be conducted at both the Raft River hydrothermal site in South Central Idaho and at the INL Research Center in Idaho Falls. The purpose of this work is to characterize tracers and test these tracers at the Raft River project through use of tracers and methods under realistic conditions. INL researchers will use an existing commercial hydrothermal site at Raft River that is currently operated by U.S. Geothermal, Inc. (USG), with whom INL has established a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) partnership. Numerous wells have previously been

42

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-653 HVAC Modifications SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project plans to replace the existing blowers, swamp coolers and electric heaters in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Test Reactor Area-653 (TRA-653) office area with three roof mounted heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and install six roof mounted HVAC units at the TRA-653 machine shop area. These modifications are needed to enhance workplace habitability, maintain a more consistent building environment, and achieve a more energy efficient system. The TRA- 653 machine shop currently uses portable swamp coolers to cool their shop. TRA-653 is eligible for the National Historic Register, however, the activity as described is exempt from cultural resource review (INL Cultural Resource Management Plan;

43

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-011 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-011 DIRECTIONS: Responsible Managers, Project Environmental Lead, and Environmental Support personnel complete this form by following the instructions found at the beginning of each section and submit to Environmental Support & Services (environmental.checklist@inl.gov). SECTION A. Project Title: CFA and ATR-Complex Analytical and R&D Laboratory Operation (Overarching) SECTION B. Project Description: This EC replaces overarching EC INL-05-017 due to changes in the laboratories identified in EC INL-05-017. The proposed action will continue to cover laboratory-based analytical and research and development (R&D) activities in laboratories located at the Central Facility Area (CFA) and the Advanced Test Reactor Complex (ATR-C) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). These activities include

44

FAQ's for: ENERGY STAR Verification Testing Pilot Program dated...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

faqfinaldecember-2010.pdf More Documents & Publications Comment submitted by the Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program DOE...

45

Date 2014/05/06 By B. Lucier * final-tests.scm: Add dirichlet-tests ...  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

final-tests.scm: specialize all floating-point operations to be either fixnum or flonum * matlab-to-pufs-triangulation.scm: New file; define coordinates->vertices,

46

A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage May 9, 2012 - 3:20pm Addthis Amanda McAlpin Last week I went home for a family reunion. Visiting my family was great, and one of my favorite things was hanging out with my dad in the garage while he works on the car. When my siblings and I began to drive and own cars, my dad continually reminded us of the need to keep our cars on a regular maintenance schedule. With warmer spring weather here, and summer just around the corner, it's a great time to get these things done. To make things easy, we have a checklist for you so it's easy to remember what needs to be done. Keeping your engine in tune can be one of the most effective things you can do for your gas mileage. Repairing some problems that can be uncovered with

47

A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage A Few Simple Steps for Better Gas Mileage May 9, 2012 - 3:20pm Addthis Amanda McAlpin Last week I went home for a family reunion. Visiting my family was great, and one of my favorite things was hanging out with my dad in the garage while he works on the car. When my siblings and I began to drive and own cars, my dad continually reminded us of the need to keep our cars on a regular maintenance schedule. With warmer spring weather here, and summer just around the corner, it's a great time to get these things done. To make things easy, we have a checklist for you so it's easy to remember what needs to be done. Keeping your engine in tune can be one of the most effective things you can do for your gas mileage. Repairing some problems that can be uncovered with

48

New LM Unit Root Tests in the Presence of a Possible Break of Unknown Date and Size  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

New LM Unit Root Tests in the Presence of a Possible Break of Unknown Date and Size John T. Cuddington and Shuichiro Nishioka December 6, 2005 Abstract: Lagrange Multiplier (LM) unit root tests performs poorly when used in LM unit root tests and propose an alternative procedure that uses the sup

49

New Funding Boosts Carbon Capture, Solar Energy and High Gas Mileage Cars  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

New Funding Boosts Carbon Capture, Solar Energy and High Gas New Funding Boosts Carbon Capture, Solar Energy and High Gas Mileage Cars and Trucks New Funding Boosts Carbon Capture, Solar Energy and High Gas Mileage Cars and Trucks June 11, 2009 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON D.C. --- U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu today announced more than $300 million worth of investments that will boost a range of clean energy technologies - including carbon capture from coal, solar power, and high efficiency cars and trucks. The move reflects the Obama Administration's commitment to a broad based strategy that will create millions of jobs while transforming the way we use and produce energy. "There's enormous potential for new jobs and reduced carbon pollution just by implementing existing technologies like energy efficiency and wind

50

Assessment of the Emissions Behavior of Higher Mileage Class...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

life, including PEMS (on-road) testing as well as engine dynamometer testing p-11smith.pdf More Documents & Publications Recent Research to Address Technical Barriers to...

51

FAQ's for: ENERGY STAR Verification Testing Pilot Program dated December 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FAQ for: ENERGY STAR Verification Testing Pilot Program December 2010 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 What product types will be tested? ................................................................................................. 1 Will testing continue after the State Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program (SEEARP) ends? .................................................................................................................................................... 1 For Consumers .......................................................................................................................... 1

52

MEMORANDUM DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE DATE :;++, -m--s B-w- -w---m-- SUBJECT: , ::;:: JLLiucd ALTERN&TE e---e---- --------------------------- CITY&da NCIME: ---------------------- - --------------------- J&f STATE: OWNER ( S 1 -----m-e Past 0 Current: ------------------------ Owner contacted 0 -------------------------- 0 yes no; if ye=, date contacted ------w---s-- TYPE OF OPERATION ----w------------ F Research & Development 0 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing F Pilot Scale 0 Manufacturing 0 Bench Scale Process 0 University Research 0 Theoretical 0 Organization Studies 0 Sample & Analysis 0 Government Sponsored Facility 0 Other --------------------- 0 Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRfiCT a--------------- 0 Prim- 0 Subcontract& s Purchase Order

53

Round-robin testing of Soleq EV cort according to the SAE J1634 test procedure dated May 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Society of Automotive Engineers Recommended Practice, SAE J1634, {open_quotes}Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption and Range Test Procedure{close_quotes}, May 1993, describes a standard method of determining the range and energy consumption for electric vehicles. Consequent to the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE) rulemaking released on February 4, 1994, the EPA is currently considering factoring electric vehicles into the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) calculations using the SAE J1634 procedure. The purpose of this project is to provide information regarding the suitability of this recommended practice for determining the energy economy value to be factored into the CAFE. Issues leading to possible inconsistent results (such as the repeatability of the procedure, thoroughness of the procedure`s methods, and variance between different laboratories using different dynamometers) need to be resolved prior to passing legislation which will mandate use of this test in determining the electric vehicle CAFE credit. To this end, separate tests were performed on a Soleq EVcort vehicle by the INEL, the EPA, Ford Motor Company, Southwest Research Institute, and the California Air Resources Board using their own facilities and personnel. Acceptable departures from the driving profile prescribed by SAEJ1634 are not well defined. This deficiency in the procedure is even more noticeable due to the EVcort`s marginal acceleration performance.

Cole, G.H.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Automotive advertising copy test. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In order to better understand consumer perceptions and use of the mileage estimates as presented in print advertising, the Department of Energy, in conjunction with the Federal Trade Commission and the EPA, initiated a research project. Purpose was to: measure recall/recognition of EPA Estimated MPG/highway mileage estimates in print ads; determine consumer expectations and believability of advertised mileage guidelines; measure recall/comprehension of mileage disclaimers; and determine how consumers utilize published mileage estimates.

Not Available

1984-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

Final Report - Enhanced LAW Glass Formulation Testing, VSL-07R1130-1, Rev. 0, dated 10/05/07  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal objective of this work was to extend the glass formulation methodology developed in the earlier work [2, 5, 6] for Envelope A, B and C waste compositions for development of compliant glass compositions targeting five high sodium-sulfur waste loading regions. This was accomplished through a combination of crucible-scale tests, and tests on the DM10 melter system. The DM10 was used for several previous tests on LAW compositions to determine the maximum feed sulfur concentrations that can be processed without forming secondary sulfate phases on the surface of the melt pool. This melter is the most efficient melter platform for screening glass compositions over a wide range of sulfate concentrations and therefore was selected for the present tests. The tests were conducted to provide information on melter processing characteristics and off-gas data, including sulfur incorporation and partitioning. As described above, the main objective was to identify the limits of waste loading in compliant glass formulations spanning the range of expected Na{sub 2}O and SO{sub 3} concentrations in the LAW glasses.

Kruger, Albert A.; Pegg, I. L.; Matlack, K. S.; Joseph, I.; Muller, I. S.; Gong, W.

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

56

MEMORANDUfl DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE DATE cl e-w --we-- SUBJECT: __------------------------ _ OWNER (S) -----w-e Pamt a __---------------------- current: -------------------_______ Owner contacted 0 yes 0 no; if yes, date contacted --------w-w-- TYPE OF OPERATION ------------- erearch & Development a Facility Typr Praduction scale trstinq Pilot Scale Bench Seal e Process Theoretical Studies Sample & Analysis n Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT ---------------- 0 Prim* 7z Subcontract& Purchase Order . Mmuf l cturing University Research Organization Government Sponsored Facility Rther ----B.-------------- 0 Othrr information (i.e., cost + fixrd fee, unit prier, time 81 material, rte) -m-M--- -------------------------- ---------------------------- Contract/Purchase Order M

57

2013 Chevrolet Malibu ECO Hybrid  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 : 3.00 V Thermal Management: Active - Forced air Pack Weight: 65 lb BEGINNING-OF-TEST: BATTERY LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Vehicle Mileage and Testing Date Vehicle...

58

2013 Chevrolet Malibu ECO Hybrid ? VIN 6605, Advanced Vehicle...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 : 3.00 V Thermal Management: Active - Forced air Pack Weight: 65 lb BEGINNING-OF-TEST: BATTERY LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Vehicle Mileage and Testing Date Vehicle...

59

Testing of low-temperature stabilization alternatives for salt containing mixed wastes -- Approach and results to date  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Through its annual process of identifying technology deficiencies associated with waste treatment, the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Mixed Waste Focus Area (MWFA) determined that the former DOE weapons complex lacks efficient mixed waste stabilization technologies for salt containing wastes. These wastes were generated as sludge and solid effluents from various primary nuclear processes involving acids and metal finishing; and well over 10,000 cubic meters exist at 6 sites. In addition, future volumes of these problematic wastes will be produced as other mixed waste treatment methods such as incineration and melting are deployed. The current method used to stabilize salt waste for compliant disposal is grouting with Portland cement. This method is inefficient since the highly soluble and reactive chloride, nitrate, and sulfate salts interfere with the hydration and setting processes associated with grouting. The inefficiency results from having to use low waste loadings to ensure a durable and leach resistant final waste form. The following five alternatives were selected for MWFA development funding in FY97 and FY98: phosphate bonded ceramics; sol-gel process; polysiloxane; polyester resin; and enhanced concrete. Comparable evaluations were planned for the stabilization development efforts. Under these evaluations each technology stabilized the same type of salt waste surrogates. Final waste form performance data such as compressive strength, waste loading, and leachability could then be equally compared. Selected preliminary test results are provided in this paper.

Maio, V.; Loomis, G. [Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Spence, R.D. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Smith, G. [Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Biyani, R.K. [SGN Eurisys Services Corp., Richland, WA (United States); Wagh, A. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Testing of low temperature stabilization alternatives for salt-containing mixed wastes -- approach and results to date  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Through its annual process of identifying technology deficiencies associated with waste treatment, the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Mixed Waste Focus Area (MWFA) determined that the former DOE weapons complex lacks efficient mixed waste stabilization technologies for salt containing wastes. The current method used to stabilize salt waste for compliant disposal is grouting with Portland cement. This method is inefficient since the highly soluble and reactive chloride, nitrate, and sulfate salts interfere with the hydration and setting processes associated with grouting. The following five alternative salt waste stabilization technologies were selected for MWFA development funding in FY97 and FY98: (1) Phosphate Bonded Ceramics, (2) Sol-gel, (3) Polysiloxane, (4) Polyester Resin, and (5) Enhanced Concrete. Comparable evaluations were planned for the stabilization development efforts. Under these evaluations each technology stabilized the same type of salt waste surrogates as specified by the MWFA. Final waste form performance data such as compressive strength, waste loading, and leachability can then be equally compared to the requirements originally specified. In addition to the selected test results provided in this paper, the performance of each alternative stabilization technology, will be documented in formal MWFA Innovative Technology Summary Reports (ITSRs).

Maio, V.; Loomis, G. [Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)] [Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Biyani, R.K. [SGN Eurisys Services Corp., Richland, WA (United States)] [SGN Eurisys Services Corp., Richland, WA (United States); Smith, G. [Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA (United States)] [Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Spence, R. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)] [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Wagh, A. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)] [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

DATE: TO:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 41 4 DATE: TO: September 2,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Procurement Data System Coding (FPDS) for Hurricane Gustav SUMMARY: An emergency declaration was made in preparation for Hurricane Gustav. The effective date for this declaration was August 29,2008. FPDS has been updated to include Hurricane Gustav as a choice in the data field "National Interest Action." When making an award to support the emergency, please ensure FPDS is properly coded. This Flash will be available online within a day, at the following website: http://www.rnananement.ener~y.~ov/policy guidance/policy flasheshtm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be

62

DATE: TO:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28 28 - DATE: TO: v POLICY FLASH 2008-28 February 19,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA41 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2008-06, Domestic and Foreign Procurement Preference Requirements SUMMARY: AL 2008-06 (attached) replaces AL 2002-06, dated 08/14/02, "Domestic and Foreign Procurement Preference Rules," which is hereby canceled. AL 2002-06 disseminated deviations to FAR provisions and clauses relating to foreign acquisition for use by Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and Power Marketing Administration (PMA) contracting activities. This new AL provides updated deviations to the FAR provisions and clauses for use by DOE,

63

MEMORANDUfl J: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

J: FILE DATE J: FILE DATE // //r /so -----------w------m FROM: 9. 34oyc -w--------v----- SUBJECT: D3 Bo;s CL&;C J mL-;+J; - Rcc cap 049 /'A :j$: &336;s L-.fh~ w-f L-1 ALE"nirTE __ ------------- --- ---_------------------ CITY: &u+M- - &. -w---v------ ---B-------w STATE: 0 h' -a---- OWNER(S) --pi::;- l>cl, b af.5 CA.-*>J CD Current: Gr;W i- ~U~&;P~ -------------,,' ,-,,,,-, Owner contacted 0 yes jg no; -------------------------- if yes, date contacted ------m------ TYPE OF OPERATION --w--w----------- & Research & Development a Facility Type 0 Production scale testing Cl Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies w Sample & Analysis 0 Manufacturing 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility

64

Date Event  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Timeline of DOE's review of the Solyndra Loan Guarantee Application Timeline of DOE's review of the Solyndra Loan Guarantee Application Date Event 2005 Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program created (as part of EPAct 2005) Aug. 8, 2006 DOE issues solicitation seeking pre-applications for Title XVII loan guarantees Dec. 28, 2006 Solyndra submits pre-application, seeking funding for its Fab 1 manufacturing facility April - June 2007 DOE conducts financial and technical review of Solyndra pre-application Oct. 4, 2007 DOE invites Solyndra, and 15 other applicants, to submit full applications May 6, 2008 Company submits full application, seeking funding for its Fab 2 manufacturing facility. DOE begins due diligence. Sept. 4, 2008 DOE loan programs staff draft memorandum indicating that Solyndra was the "earliest mover" and may receive conditional commitment by January 16, 2009

65

Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Properties of type "Date" Properties of type "Date" Showing 47 properties using this type. A Property:ASHRAE 169 End Date Property:ASHRAE 169 Start Date B Property:Building/EndPeriod Property:Building/StartPeriod Property:Building/YearConstruction Property:Building/YearConstruction1 Property:Building/YearConstruction2 Property:Buildings/ModelYear Property:Buildings/PublicationYear C Property:CommercialOnlineDate D Property:DSIRE/LstUpdt E Property:EndDate Property:EndYear Property:EnergyAccessYearInitiated Property:Event/Date Property:ExpActivityDate E cont. Property:ExpActivityDateEnd F Property:File/CreationDate Property:FirstWellDate G Property:GEAReportDate Property:Geothermal/FY Property:Geothermal/ProjectEndDate Property:Geothermal/ProjectStartDate H Property:HPBD/DateOfOccupancy I Property:Incentive/DsireLstSubModSummaryUpdt

66

HEMORANDUH TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

HEMORANDUH HEMORANDUH TO: FILE DATE 1123 lLjl ---WV-------------- FROM: P. s&w+ -------v-----s-- SUBJECT: lJ+ - e;& SITE NAME: LJo"zL - /L,' de Cd -J--h=- ALTERNATE l --e-e-- ------w------- ---,,,' ,m--, NAME: ---------------------- CITY: LL-pL~ ------------ ------------- STATE3 e--w-- OWNER tS) -----w-- Past I --k-!!.l~ -pa L . -v-----w------- Current: Owner contac?-ed 0 yes 0 no; if yes, I+Lff A zid;&m - -------------------------- date contacted ------B--m--- TYPE OF OPERATION ----------------- a Research 81 Development a Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Procesr 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample & Analysis m Manuf acturinq 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponrored Facility 0 Other

67

TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

tlEi?ORANDUH tlEi?ORANDUH TO: FILE DATE FFtOil: c ----'- Y '%d 6- ----_----_ SUBJECT: SITE NAME: ----------STATE: Owner contacted 0 yes qno; if yes, date contacted ---------__-- TYPE OF OPERATION ----~_--_--~----_ &Research & Development @ Praduction scale testing. 0 Pilat Scale 0 Bench Scale Process a Theoretical Studies 0 Sample & Analysis tin Facility Type R Manufacturing IJ University 0 Research Organization IJ Gavernment Sponsored Facility 0 Other ----------------' --~- 0 Production E Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT ~~_-~--_---_--__ P Prime 0 I Cl Subcontractor Other information (i.e., cost K Purchase Order jZM pati !& MC4 + fixed fee, unit price, time 81 material, etc) ---------------------_----~-- OWNERSHIP: AEC/MED AEC/MED GOVT GOVT

68

lead-isotope dating  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

lead-isotope dating, lead-lead dating, lead-isotope age measurement, lead-lead age measurement ? Blei-Isotopen(-Alters)bestimmung, f, Blei-Isotopen-Datierung

2014-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 . 1 . January 20,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Commercial Items Test Program SUMMARY: Attached for your information is a copy of Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC) Letter 2009-04. It advises that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 201 0, Section 8 16 authorizes extension of the Commercial Items Test Program from January 1,20 10 to January 1,20 12 and that an expedited FAR Case is being processed to insert the new date at FAR 13.500(d). Also attached is a class deviation authorizing the use of simplified acquisition procedures for commercial items up to $5.5 million [$I1 million for acquisitions of commercial items under FAR

70

Final Report - Glass Formulation Testing to Increase Sulfate Volatilization from Melter, VSL-04R4970-1, Rev. 0, dated 2/24/05  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal objectives of the DM100 and DM10 tests were to determine the impact of four different organics and one inorganic feed additive on sulfate volatilization and to determine the sulfur partitioning between the glass and the off-gas system. The tests provided information on melter processing characteristics and off-gas data including sulfur incorporation and partitioning. A series of DM10 and DM100 melter tests were conducted using a LAW Envelope A feed. The testing was divided into three parts. The first part involved a series of DM10 melter tests with four different organic feed additives: sugar, polyethylene glycol (PEG), starch, and urea. The second part involved two confirmatory 50-hour melter tests on the DM100 using the best combination of reductants and conditions based on the DM10 results. The third part was performed on the DM100 with feeds containing vanadium oxide (V{sub 2}O{sub 5}) as an inorganic additive to increase sulfur partitioning to the off-gas. Although vanadium oxide is not a reductant, previous testing has shown that vanadium shows promise for partitioning sulfur to the melter exhaust, presumably through its known catalytic effect on the SO{sub 2}/SO{sub 3} reaction. Crucible-scale tests were conducted prior to the melter tests to confirm that the glasses and feeds would be processable in the melter and that the glasses would meet the waste form (ILAW) performance requirements. Thus, the major objectives of these tests were to: ? Perform screening tests on the DM10 followed by tests on the DM100-WV system using a LAW -Envelope A feed with four organic additives to assess their impact on sulfur volatilization. ? Perform tests on the DM100-WV system using a LAW -Envelope A feed containing vanadium oxide to assess its impact on sulfur volatilization. ? Determine feed processability and product quality with the above additives. ? Collect melter emissions data to determine the effect of additives on sulfur partitioning and melter emissions. ? Collect and analyze discharged glass to determine sulfur retention in the glass. ? Prepare and characterize feeds and glasses with the additives to confirm that the feeds and the glass melts are suitable for processing in the DM100 melter. ? Prepare and characterize glasses with the additives to confirm that the glasses meet the waste form (ILAW) performance requirements.

Kruger, Albert A.; Matlack, K. A.; Pegg, I. L.; Gong, W.

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

71

Final Report - Glass Formulation Development and DM10 Melter Testing with ORP LAW Glasses, VSL-09R1510-2, Rev. 0, dated 6/12/09  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal objective of the work described in this Final Report is to extend the glass formulation methodology developed in the earlier work by development of acceptable glass compositions for four LAW compositions specified by ORP that cover the range of sulfate to sodium and potassium to sodium ratios expected in Hanford LAW. The glass formulations were designed to exclude titanium and iron as glass former additives, while tin and vanadium as glass former additives were evaluated for beneficial effects in increasing waste loading in the glasses. This was accomplished through a combination of crucible-scale tests and tests on the DM10 melter system. This melter is the most efficient melter platform for screening glass compositions over a wide range of sulfate concentrations and therefore was selected for the present tests. The current tests provide information on melter processing characteristics and off-gas data, including sulfur incorporation and partitioning.

Kruger, Albert A.; Pegg, I. L.; Matlack, K. S.; Joseph, I.; Muller, I. S.; Gong, W.

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

72

HEV Fleet Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

VIN # 1N4CL21E87C172351 Date Mileage Description Cost 10/22/2007 3,658 Changed oil $36.39 11/14/2007 7,562 Changed oil $36.39 12/4/2007 12,008 Changed oil $36.41 1/3/2008 15,418 Changed oil $42.31 1/24/2008 19,057 Changed oil $27.60 1/29/2008 19,109 Replaced one tire $82.13 3/4/2008 24,662 Changed oil and filter $35.84 4/8/2008 32,703 Changed oil and filter $27.85 4/30/2008 37,495 Changed oil and filter $27.91 5/21/2008 40,655 Replaced and balanced four tires $258.41 5/29/2008 44,833 Changed oil and filter $27.91 7/2/2008 53,778 Changed oil and filter $27.91 8/4/2008 62,686 Changed oil and filter, replaced air filter and cabin air filter, replaced coolant, and rotated tires $246.04 8/22/2008 66,967 Changed oil and filled windshield washer $41.30

73

HEV Fleet Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Ford Escape 2WD 5 Ford Escape 2WD VIN # 1FMYU95H75KC45881 Date Mileage Description Cost 5/25/2005 6,707 Changed oil (5W20 synthetic) and purchased oil for three oil changes $105.47 7/15/2005 17,236 15K service $438.65 8/17/2005 22,221 Changed oil and rotated tires $27.44 9/26/2005 27,425 Changed oil and rotated tires $28.20 11/8/2005 32,703 30K service $211.63 11/25/2005 33,560 Repaired tire $20.00 1/12/2006 42,632 45K service (included: tire balancing, replacing fuel filter and replacing cabin filter) $274.16 3/8/2006 52,141 Changed oil and rotated tires $31.56 4/19/2006 59,883 60K service $317.80 4/19/2006 59,883 HV traction battery connection failed $262.50 5/17/2006 64,641 Changed oil and rotated tires $34.73 6/5/2006 66,059 Recall for absorbing materials being insufficient above forward corner of the interior headliner no charge

74

HEV Fleet Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lexus RX400h Lexus RX400h VIN # JTJHW31U160002575 Date Mileage Description Cost 7/27/2005 5,159 Changed oil no charge 10/5/2005 10,375 10K service $212.23 1/4/2006 15,835 Changed oil and rotated tires $18.21 4/11/2006 21,752 Changed oil and rotated tires $18.69 8/16/2006 26,957 Changed oil and rotated tires $18.69 9/7/2006 27,641 Replaced power switch on rear door Warranty 11/20/2006 29,275 13 trouble codes with install of data box - replaced auxiliary battery Warranty 12/13/2006 32,283 Changed oil and rotated tires $23.18 1/4/2007 36,620 Changed oil $32.38 1/26/2007 41,491 changed oil and replaced filter $55.78 2/19/2007 45,948 Changed oil $40.47 3/29/2007 57,021 Changed oil $31.78 4/20/2007 61,238 Changed oil $35.92 5/11/2007 66,417 Changed oil $33.28

75

HEV Fleet Testing Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Activity Activity Maintenance Sheet for 2007 Saturn Vue VIN # 5GZCZ33Z07S838122 Date Mileage Description Cost 12/8/2006 5,055 Changed oil $33.95 1/9/2007 12,509 Changed oil $25.88 2/8/2007 17,916 Changed oil $42.78 2/15/2007 19,841 Installed Lojack antitheft system $625.00 4/17/2007 30,124 Changed oil $42.36 6/19/2007 45,307 Changed oil $40.70 6/20/2007 45,695 Replaced two tires $257.46 7/10/2007 50,522 Changed oil $38.94 8/15/2007 55,654 Changed oil $32.85 9/3/2007 Vehicle involved in motor vehicle accident - deer hit car windshield and car was under repair 9/12/2007 60,395 Changed oil and replaced air filter $73.48 10/4/2007 65,226 Changed oil and replaced oil filter $37.16 10/19/2007 65,278 Transaxle service and replaced faulty AC compressor $1,056.62 (paid deductible) $100.00

76

Date created: Date amended: February 2009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

or on any relevant individual issue � Determining what types of risk are acceptable and which appetite is usually defined as "the amount of risk that an organisation is prepared to accept, tolerateDate created: Date amended: February 2009 - 1 � Risk Management Policy.doc RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY 1

Subramanian, Sriram

77

Final Report - Testing of Optimized Bubbler Configuration for HLW Melter VSL-13R2950-1, Rev. 0, dated 6/12/2013  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal objective of this work was to determine the glass production rate increase and ancillary effects of adding more bubbler outlets to the current WTP HLW melter baseline. This was accomplished through testing on the HLW Pilot Melter (DM1200) at VSL. The DM1200 unit was selected for these tests since it was used previously with several HLW waste streams including the four tank wastes proposed for initial processing at Hanford. This melter system was also used for the development and optimization of the present baseline WTP HLW bubbler configuration for the WTP HLW melter, as well as for MACT testing for both HLW and LAW. Specific objectives of these tests were to: Conduct DM1200 melter testing with the baseline WTP bubbling configuration and as augmented with additional bubblers. Conduct DM1200 melter testing to differentiate the effects of total bubbler air flow and bubbler distribution on glass production rate and cold cap formation. Collect melter operating data including processing rate, temperatures at a variety of locations within the melter plenum space, melt pool temperature, glass melt density, and melter pressure with the baseline WTP bubbling configuration and as augmented with additional bubblers. Collect melter exhaust samples to compare particulate carryover for different bubbler configurations. Analyze all collected data to determine the effects of adding more bubblers to the WTP HLW melter to inform decisions regarding future lid re-designs. The work used a high aluminum HLW stream composition defined by ORP, for which an appropriate simulant and high waste loading glass formulation were developed and have been previously processed on the DM1200.

Kruger, Albert A.; Pegg, I. L.; Callow, R. A.; Joseph, I.; Matlack, K. S.; Kot, W. K.

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

78

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

/I // /s 3 /I // /s 3 ------------------- FROM: D. I&+ ---------------- SUBJECT: 5;le r 3-&-F.. SITE /+yNJs l3 ALTERNATE NAME: -w---- -SF ------------------------------ NAME: CITY: c ;A< ;,+,ZJ+ ------------,-L-----,,,,,, STATE: OH --w-w- OWNER(S) -w---s-- past: /" ' A--F5 ---w-m- -e----v-------- Current: 0~. A-+A.~~ -------------------------- Owner contacted 0 yes 0 no; if yes, date contacted ------------- TYPE OF OPERATION -------e--------w 0 Research & Development 0 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample 84 Analysis x Manufacturing 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility 0 Other --------------------- B Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT

79

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-.. -.. 37qg: MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE =b-- FROM: ---L- _------__ u . SUBJECT: SITE ACl= ALTERNATE NAME: -_______-~-----------------NA~E:__( CITY:--~---------_-STATE:-~~ (2 OWNE!sI_SL f Past- L&cl= w ------------------- ----- Current- w buL.r - ------------ ownq cm-ltacted 0 yes @ "no; if yes, data cnntacte TYPE OF OPERATION -------------_~-~ q Research & Development 0 Production %.cale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample 84 Analysis 0 Production i2 Disposal/Storage 0 Facility T 0 Hanufac 0 Univerrj 0 .R esearc 0 Governm 14 Other 1 I lil IrJ y,/3 Prime 0 Other infcrkion Subcwkractbr (i.e., ?bst + fixed fee! &nit price, Cl Purchase Order time & mate

80

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

5/22/w 5/22/w ------..------------- FROM: D- f&u+ ---------------- SUBJECT: E/;-+&o.. ReC*-C.AB&;O* +L /z&J; &DC,, /Ptrr; CLonr z-r. SITE NAME: _ ALTERNATE ----------WV-- --------------------- NAME: EAT ---- ------------------ CAY: r-led 4' or k -------------------------- STATE: ti Y VW---- OWNER tS) -------- Past: ---Cl&zt.t.r-----~-~- ---- =urr=nt: ti& LPdA Owner cnntacted 0 yes mo; i+ ye8, -------------------------- date contacted ------------- TYPE OF OPERATION ----------------- w Research & Development E3 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing Cl Pilot Scale a Bench Scale Process B Theoretical Studies 0 Sample & Analysis 0 Manufacturing 0 University @ Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility 17 Other

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

MEMORANDUM I TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM I TO: FILE DATE -----_-_- FaOM: ~~,~hkcid!,~- ' ALTERNATE CITY: I\ptw)a.yk --~---_--___-~--~---______ STATE: I current: ------------_------_-~~~~~ if yes, date contacted ____ TYPE OF OPERATION -_---_---------__ 0 Research & Development 6 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilat Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies Sample $ rraductian & Analysis a Manufacturing I 0 University I (1 Research Organization 0 Government Sponao&ed Facility 0 Cither I ----e------y-------- 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT --~_----~__~~~-- ' 0 Prime q Subcontract& q Purchase Order cl Other informatian (i.e., cost + fixed fee, unit pri'ce, time & material, qtc) ------- --------------------~------ Contract/Purchase Order #

82

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ANNUAL EQUIPMENT TESTING AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ANNUAL EQUIPMENT TESTING AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY DIVING SAFETY PROGRAM Date Tested Condition when received Intermediate Pressure Inhalation Resistance Exhalation Resistance Tested Make Serial Number Date Tested Results DEPTH GAUGE BUOYANCY COMPENSATOR Make Serial Number Date

Wilcock, William

83

COUNTRY INSTITUTION SIGNING DATE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

COUNTRY INSTITUTION SIGNING DATE /RENEWAL WEB SITE ALBANIA University of Tirana 11.12.2001 www /RENEWAL WEB SITE FINLAND JAMK University of Applied Sciences 29.10.2009 www.jamk.fi/ FRANCE ?cole INSTITUTION SIGNING DATE /RENEWAL WEB SITE MACEDONIA St. Cyril and Methodius" University of Skopje 11

Di Pillo, Gianni

84

Iraq Produces Date Sugar  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Iraq will soon begin manufacture of sugar from dates as a result of experiments carried out under a UNESCO program by a Swiss scientist. Development of this industry will save the country some $16 million annually formerly spent for imported sugar.Dates ...

1955-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

85

DATE: ____________________ NVLAP LAB CODE: __________________ Test Method  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Panel Materials-Part A, Sec. 11-20: Static Bending ______ 23/G02a ANSI A208.1-1999 (Sec. 3.3.7) Particleboard, Sec. 3.3.7: Modulus of Rupture and Modulus of Elasticity ______ 23/G02b ANSI A208.2-2002 (Sec. 3 to Surface ______ 23/G03a ANSI A208.1-1999 (Sec. 3.3.6) Particleboard, Sec. 3.3.6: Internal Bond ______ 23/G

86

TO: FILE DATE------  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE------ DATE------ la Fp7 ---------__ OWNER(.=) m-----z- Past: -----_------------------ Current: ------------i----------- Owner c:nntacted q ye' s y "0; !' L-----J if yea, date contacted TYPE OF OPERATION -------_------___ 0 Research & Development cl Facility Type 0 Production scale testins 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process E Theoretical Studies Sample SI Analysis [7 Manufacturing i University $ Resear.& Organization Government Sponsored Facility 0 Other -~------------------- 0 Production G Di spo5alfStorage TYPE OF CONTRACT ~------~--~~---- 0 Prime 0 Suhccntractnr 0 Purchase Order q Other information (i.e., crJst + fixed fee, unit price, time & material, etc) ------- ---------------------------- ~Canfrakt/Purchase Order # ----------------___---------

87

Dating the Vinland Map  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

Scientists from Brookhaven National Laboratory, the University of Arizona, and the Smithsonian Institution used carbon-dating technology to determine the age of a controversial parchment that might be the first-ever map of North America.

None

2013-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

88

COST BREAKDOWN AWARD NO: START DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: FISCAL...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

COST BREAKDOWN AWARD NO: START DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: FISCAL YEAR BREAKDOWN OF FUNDS ELEMENTS FY FY FY FY FY TOTAL Direct Labor Overhead Materials Supplies Travel Other Direct...

89

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

d d POLICY FLASH 2010-64 DATE: TO: FROM: July 7,201 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 I Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-42 SUMMARY: Attached for your information is a summary of Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-42 which makes changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The FAC has eleven rules (seven final and four interim) and one technical amendment. Attached is a short overview of the rules to include its effective date and applicability date. To view FAC 2005-42 go to the Federal Register Browse web link at http://www.~~oaccess.~ov/fr/browse.html and search for the Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 for Wednesday, June 16,2010.

90

History of Radiocarbon Dating  

DOE R&D Accomplishments [OSTI]

The development is traced of radiocarbon dating from its birth in curiosity regarding the effects of cosmic radiation on Earth. Discussed in historical perspective are: the significance of the initial measurements in determining the course of developments; the advent of the low-level counting technique; attempts to avoid low-level counting by the use of isotopic enrichment; the gradual appearance of the environmental effect due to the combustion of fossil fuel (Suess effect); recognition of the atmosphere ocean barrier for carbon dioxide exchange; detailed understanding of the mixing mechanism from the study of fallout radiocarbon; determination of the new half-life; indexing and the assimilation problem for the massive accumulation of dates; and the proliferation of measurement techniques and the impact of archaeological insight on the validity of radiocarbon dates. (author)

Libby, W. F.

1967-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

91

Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4t 3 4t 3 l I Project lnfonnatlon Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date: 11-22-2010 DOE Code: 673()-()20-51141 Contractor Code: 8067-778 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. The purpose of the project is to test a tool that temporarily reduces the viscosity of oil which allows it to be 1. Brief project description ~nclude pumped through pipelines easier. The test will require about 4 miles of line to pump the oil through after anything that could impact the treatment (hence the need to connect the 31oops together), a holding volume for recovery, then repeat. environmenJ] There will be tanks to hold the original volume, tanks to receive the volume after treatment and pumping 2. Legal location through the line, possible transfer between tanks, transport (trucking) of the oil to the site (by the COC) and

92

Create Date: Create Time  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

provisions. AB 0074 Ch. 666 Assembly Member Ma Public event action plans and cooperative agreements. AB 0080 Ch. 138 Assembly Member Fong Presidential primary: election date. AB 0082 Ch. 92 * Assembly Assembly Member Fong Elections: new citizens. AB 0089 Ch. 390 * Assembly Member Hill County employees

93

Quantum Dating Market  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We consider the dating market decision problem under the quantum mechanics point of view. Quantum states whose associated amplitudes are modified by men strategies are used to represent women. Grover quantum search algorithm is used as a playing strategy. Success is more frequently obtained by playing quantum than playing classic.

O. G. Zabaleta; C. M. Arizmendi

2010-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

94

FROM: DATE: TO:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DATE: DATE: TO: POLICY FLASH 2010-48 May 06,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition LetterIFinancial Assistance Letter (ALIFAL) 201 0-06, Acquiring Information Technology, Requirement to Comply With Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) SUMMARY: ALIFAL 201 0-06 provides notice that the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council are issuing a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to require that Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) compliant products be included in all new information technology (IT) acquisitions using Internet Protocol (IP). ALIFAL 2010-06, accordingly, updates the IPv6 guidance provided in AL-2006-04.

95

How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov?  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? How Does Your Fuel Economy Compare to the Test Ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? November 12, 2009 - 8:36am Addthis On Monday, you read about the resources on Fueleconomy.gov and how they can help you compare the fuel economy of vehicles. Fueleconomy.gov also offers a tool called Your MPG, where you can track your own fuel economy and compare it to that of other users and to the test ratings. Many factors affect your mileage, and you may see different numbers than those list on Fueleconomy.gov. Whether you are using Your MPG or just keeping track on your own: How does your fuel economy compare to the test ratings on Fueleconomy.gov? Each Thursday, you have the chance to share your thoughts on a question

96

DATE: February 7, 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: July 8, 2011 Report Number: INS-L-11-02 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-40 (S10IS001) SUBJECT: Letter Report on "Implementation of Nuclear Weapons Quality Assurance Requirements at Los Alamos National Laboratory" TO: Manager, Los Alamos Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Los Alamos National Laboratory (Los Alamos) is a multidisciplinary research and production institution responsible for the design and production of nuclear weapons components. In its effort to attain the highest quality in weapons engineering design and manufacturing, the Department of Energy

97

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

> POLICY FLASH 2010-25 DATE: TO: FROM: February 22,201 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.4 Establishing the Position of Source Evaluation Board (SEB) Secretariat and Knowledge Manager SUMMARY: As discussed at the December 2009 Procurement Directors' Meeting, a position titled "Source Evaluation Board (SEB) Secretariat and Knowledge Manager" has been established in the Acquisition Planning and Liaison Division, MA-621 Attached is the subject new DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.4 which provides guidance on the establishment of the aforementioned position and the duties and responsibilities of the position.

98

ENERGY STAR Appliance Verification Testing - Pilot Program Summary...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appliance Verification Testing - Pilot Program Summary Report dated February 3, 2012 ENERGY STAR Appliance Verification Testing - Pilot Program Summary Report dated February 3,...

99

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE, OH. 0 DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FILE, OH. 0 DATE FILE, OH. 0 DATE d4, ------------------- FROM: b. x&,.& ---------S-----W SUBJECT: 1-3/;4*~ i&-h /LCL)&l&OAiOH h fi Q-cc& )2~see~ SITE NAME: ----fl eAd4 RQJ-cL ALTERNATE __-_-_---------------------------- NAME: ---------------------- CITY: -------------------------- STATE: B---m- OWNER(S) -------- Past: JAwd* ------------------------ Current: _------------------------- Owwr contacted 0 yes rno; if yes, date contacted B-m -----w-v TYPE OF OPERATION ----------------- pg Research t Development cl Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample SC Analysie 0 Manufacturing 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility U Other ---------------------

100

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

65 65 ' July 7,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act SUMMARY: This Flash forwards a draft Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause, 52.222- 40, Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Executive Order (EO) 13496, Notification of Employee Rights under Federal Labor Laws, dated January 30,2009, requires contractors and subcontractors to post a notice that informs employees of their rights under Federal labor laws, including the National Labor Relations Act. This Act encourages collective bargaining and protects the exercise by workers of their freedom

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Issuance Date:: February  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Issuance Issuance Date:: February 11, 1966 POST-SHOT HYDROLOGI C SAFETY 68296 VUF-1014 FINAL REPORT FALLON, NEVADA OCTOBER 26, 1963 Hazleton-Nuclear Science Corporation October 30, 1965 SPONSORED BY THE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE U. S.ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION VELA UNIFORM PROJECT LEG A L NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work. Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission: A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accu- racy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information. apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the

102

United States Government DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

5oE(E;,8 ' 0 H .2+ L-1 5oE(E;,8 ' 0 H .2+ L-1 United States Government DATE: MAR 0 8 1994 REPLY TO AlTN OF: EM-421 (W. A. Williams, 903-8149) SUBJECT: Authority Determination -- Former Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., Hamilton, Ohio TO: The File The attached review documents the basis for determining whether the Department of Energy (DOE) has authority for taking remedial action at the former Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. facility in Hamilton, Ohio, under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The facility was used for the shaping and machining of uranium metal by the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) during the Second World War. The following factors are significant in reaching a decision and are discussed in more detail in the attached authority review:

103

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-7' -7' August 20,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Class Deviation by General Services Administration (GSA) to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 51.1, Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources, for Time and Material or Labor Hour Procurements SUMMARY: The attached GSA class deviation to FAR Part 51, Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources, dated October 8,2009, permits contracting officers to authorize all GSA contractors, who are performing an order on a time and material (T&M) or labor-hour (LH) basis, to purchase supplies and service from other schedule contractors or process requisitions through the GSA Supply Program. This deviation is effective for five years to October 7,2014,

104

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1,2008 1 1,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBTECT: Past Performance Data SIJMMARY: Beginning October 01,2008, all contractor past performance data shall be submitted through the Department of Defense (DoD) Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) at htt~://www.c~ars.csd.disa.mil/cr>arsmain.htm. Thus, the Department will no longer use the National Institute of Health (NIH) Contractor Performance System (CPS). To ensure all Contracting Officers understand how to use this new system, Web Cast Training has been scheduled for the following dates and times: October 8- 1:30-430 including construction and A/E training during the last hour November 6- 1:30-4:30 including construction and A/E training during the last hour

105

DATE: REPLY TO  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DOE F 1325.8 DOE F 1325.8 (NW ed States Governhent ilmemorandum DATE: REPLY TO ' bPfl29 1993 Al-fN OF: EM-421 (W. W illiams, 903-8149) SUBJECT: Authorization for Remedial Action at the Former Associate Aircraft Site, Fairfield, Ohio TO: Manager, DOE Oak Ridge Field Office This is to notify you that the Former Associated Aircraft Site in Fairfield, Ohio, is designated,for remedial action under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). This notification does not constitute a FUSRAP baseline change control approval. Approval of the baseline change will be accomplished through the normal change control procedures. The site was used by the former Atomic Energy Commission for the machining and shaping of uranium metal during the 1950s. A radiological survey

106

DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: - - -- . POLICY FLASH 2005-18 February 14, 2005 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, ME-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Small Business Contracting Policy Update SUMMARY: This Policy Flash forwards (1) information on locating Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSBs) and (2) a solicitation provision which provides guidance to prospective offerors on the impact of teaming arrangements on their small business status. 1 -- -- --------- 1. To locate SDVOSBs, you can go to the Department of Veteran Affairs' website for the Center for Veterans Enterprise site at http://www.vetbiz.gov/default2.htm. From that site you can link to the "Search for a Business" at http://vip.vetbiz.gov/search/default.asp to find SDVQSBs. 2. The following provision is recommended for solicitations

107

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POLICY FLASH 2010-08 POLICY FLASH 2010-08 DATE: TO: FROM: October 28,2009 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Amendment to Extend the Partnership Agreement between the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Energy (DOE) SUMMARY: The purpose of this flash is to advise you that an amendment was issued pursuant to Section VII of the Partnership Agreement (PA) between the SBA and the DOE. The amendment extends the current PA until November 30,2009. All other terms and conditions of the PA remain unchanged. This flash and its attachment will be available online at the following website: http://mana~ement.enerm.nov/policy nuidancelpolicy flashes.htm.

108

Release Date: April 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

April 2010 DOE/EIA-0121 (2009/04Q) April 2010 DOE/EIA-0121 (2009/04Q) Next Release Date: June 2010 Quarterly Coal Report October - December 2009 April 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 _____________________________________________________________________________ This report is available on the Web at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/quarterly/qcr.pdf _____________________________________________ This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the independent statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this

109

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 < 1 < DATE: TO: FROM: July 1,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Revised DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 71.1 Headquarters Business Clearance Process SUMMARY: There was mention in the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) report titled "Managing at the Speed of Light - Improving Mission Support Performance" that Departmental procurement personnel don't understand the Business Clearance (BC) process. In an effort to address this issue, each Procurement Director (PD) and Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) was ask to review Acquisition Guide Chapter 7 1.1 Headquarters Business Clearance Process and identify anything that was unclear, as well as recommend changes or ideas which

110

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 DATE: TO: FROM: March 25,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Rescind Policy Flashes 201 0-04 "Cease All Funding of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)" and 201 0-06 "Additional Documentation Regarding Policy Flash Number 201 0-04" SUMMARY: The purpose of this flash to inform you that on March 10,201 0, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an opinion regarding ACORN. In its opinion, the District Court concluded that the funding prohibitions regarding ACORN and related entities in FY 201 0 Continuing Resolution and in several of FY 201 0 appropriations acts

111

Date: Re: Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

~ ~ ~~ Date: Re: Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 5, 2007 TRADEMARK l APPLICATION AND LICENSING PROCEDURES, IPI Trademarks may be used by DOE or its contractors for identification of goods and services and serve as an intellectual property tool to enhance technology transfer. Registration in the PTO also helps to ensure that marks closely associated with DOE are not debased or devalued, and also helps to protect the public from those who may use marks closely associated with DOE to suggest "goods or services" are authorized by DOE. This IPI contains guidance on trademarks once the decision has been made to use a particular mark in commerce and obtain protection therefor. This IPI does not contain guidance as to when, in the first instance, a mark should be coined for association with a particular good/service, except at B.4 with respect to use of DOE as part of a mark.

112

J DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ICY FLASH 2010-5- - ICY FLASH 2010-5- - J DATE: TO: FROM: June 10,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13 Policy and Operating Procedures for Use of the GSA Smartpay2 Purchase Card SUMMARY: Attached for your information is an updated and revised copy of DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13, Purchase Card Policy and Operating Procedures. This Flash and its attachment will be posted online, at the following website: http:llwww.mananement.enerliy.gov/~olicy guidance/policy flashes.htm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Denise Clarke at (202) 287-1 748 or DeniseT.Clarke@,hq.doe.~ov . Director Office of Procurement and

113

Procurement Directors DATE: TO:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18 18 1 POLICY FLASH 2008-1 8 January 29,2008 Procurement Directors DATE: TO: FROM: Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Ofice of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Acquisition Circular 2008-18 SUMMARY: The General Services Administration has issued Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-23. This Circular can be found at page 732 14 of the December 26,2007 Federal Register. The Circular covers three subjects for which interim or final rules have been issued amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation. A description of each revision is contained in the attachment. None of these necessitates a revision of the DEAR. One of the revisions dealing with the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) replaces

114

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 December 16,2009 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Ofice of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-38 SUMMARY: Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-3 8, which makes miscellaneous changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), was published in the December 10, 2009 issue of the Federal Register. A summary of the changes is attached. Due to the publication of two rules item I11 and item V, additional guidance is provided in this flash. Item I11 - Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) (FAR Case 2005-041) - The Acquisition Letter 2006-04, Acquiring Information Technology - Requirement to Comply with Internet Protocol Version 6, dated December 14,2005, is being reviewed to determine if

115

LSPE SAFE/ ARM SLIDE DATE 28 March 197  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: ..'; I ~ ··,~ ' . LSPE SAFE/ ARM SLIDE NO. ATM-1088 REV. NO. PAGE OF- DATE 28 March 197 FAILURE/ ARM SLIDE FAILURE EVALUATION REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION OF FAILURE with Slides Having PAGI i DATE 0, Page 1 1 3 3 3 12 15 16 Larger Fillet Radius 16 6. 2 Slide Tests With 10

Rathbun, Julie A.

116

Paleomagnetic Secular Variation (PSV), 137Cs, and Hg dating techniques  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Portland State University Department of Geology #12;Hg-Mercury contamination dating http fission of Uranium-235 · Due to nuclear weapons testing · Highly water soluble (spreads quickly) · Half

Fountain, Andrew G.

117

Type Policy Title Here Effective Date: [Insert Date  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Type Policy Title Here Effective Date: [Insert Date] Policy Statement [Type Statement Text Here] Reason(s) for the Policy [Type Reason Text Here] Primary Guidance to Which This Policy Responds [Type Primary Policy Here ­ If there is NOT a Primary Policy indicate that] Responsible University Office

Salzman, Daniel

118

Absolute Time Radiometric Dating: the source of the dates on  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Absolute Time Radiometric Dating: the source of the dates on the Geologic Time Scale Radiometric.g. uranium to lead. · The parent element is radioactive, the daughter element is stable. · The decay rate nucleosynthesis. Common Radioactive Elements, Parents and Daughters · Carbon-14, C14 Nitrogen-14, N14 · Uranium

Kammer, Thomas

119

Final Report - Effects of High Spinel and Chromium Oxide Crystal Contents on Simulated HLW Vitrification in DM100 Melter Tests, VSL-09R1520-1, Rev. 0, dated 6/22/09  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The principal objective of the work was to evaluate the effects of spinel and chromium oxide particles on WTP HLW melter operations and potential impacts on melter life. This was accomplished through a combination of crucible-scale tests, settling and rheological tests, and tests on the DM100 melter system. Crucible testing was designed to develop and identify HLW glass compositions with high waste loadings that exhibit formation of crystalline spinel and/or chromium oxide phases up to relatively high crystal contents (i.e., > 1 vol%). Characterization of crystal settling and the effects on melt rheology was performed on the HLW glass formulations. Appropriate candidate HLW glass formulations were selected, based on characterization results, to support subsequent melter tests. In the present work, crucible melts were formulated that exhibit up to about 4.4 vol% crystallization.

Kruger, Albert A.; Matlack, K. S.; Kot, W.; Pegg, I. L.; Chaudhuri, M.; Lutze, W.

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

120

Conference dates 1620 April 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Conference dates 16­20 April 2012 Location The Square Conference Centre Brussels, Belgium www/nanotechnologies Mark your Calendar #12;Conference dates 16­20 April 2012 The Square Conference Centre Brussels, Belgium success, Photonics Europe 2012 will again feature choice conferences and plenary presentations

Jahns, Jürgen

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

175 175 July 30,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Security Clause, DEAR 952.204-2 SUMMARY: The DOE Security Clause, DEAR 952.204-2, was amended on May 18, 2009 to augment the background check requirement and to add a drug test requirement as prerequisites for processing a request for an access authorization (security clearance). Please check to ensure that all applicable contracts have been amended to include these updated requirements. Expect personnel security to return contractor requests for access authorizations that do not include the required information. A summary of the required information is attached. This Flash and its attachment will be available online within a day, at the following

122

Estimated Cost Description Determination Date:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and posted 2/10/2011 and posted 2/10/2011 *Title, Location Estimated Cost Description Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain $50,000 FONSI: uncertain Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain FONSI: uncertain Total Estimated Cost $70,000 Attachment: Memo, Moody to Marcinowski, III, SUBJECT: NEPA 2011 APS for DOE-SRS, Dated: Annual NEPA Planning Summary Environmental Assessments (EAs) Expected to be Initiated in the Next 12 Months Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) Jan-11 Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones) South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Industrial Stormwater General Permit (IGP) # SCR000000 November 12, with an effective date of January

123

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7/30/2013 7/30/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Alt Fuel- CNG Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2012 Honda Civic GX Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 7/30/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3192 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3192 22.2037 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.45855 0.01263 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.5872 905.3 Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t

124

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10/18/2013 10/18/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Conventional Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 10/18/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3516 Test Fuel Information Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3516 30.1456 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.37653 0.015662 Test Fuel Information Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.855 18355 Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t [ H S t ] D a t e T e s t C e l l T e m p [ C ] T e s t C e l l R H [ % ] T e s t C e l l B a r o [ i n / H g ] V e h i c l e c o o l i n g f a n s p e e d : S p e e d M a t

125

TESTING FORM Please deliver exams with envelope & testing form at least 24 hours in advance to  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

TESTING FORM Please deliver exams with envelope & testing form at least 24 hours in advance to: _________________________________ Class Time: __________ - __________ _________ Test Date: _______________________________ Time allotted): ____________________________ INSTRUCTOR PROCEDURES: 1. Please deliver tests to WYLY TOWER 318 at least 24 hours PRIOR to test time

Selmic, Sandra

126

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12 Request for Pre-Applications 12 Request for Pre-Applications Workscope Descriptions FY 2012 Request for Pre-Applications PROGRAM SUPPORTING: FUEL CYCLE R&D SEPARATIONS AND WASTE FORMS (F E DE R A L POC - J I M B R E SE E & T E C H NI C A L POC - T E R R Y T ODD) Separations and Waste Forms (FC-1) - The separations and waste forms campaign develops the next generation of fuel cycle and waste management technologies that enable a sustainable fuel cycle, with minimal processing, waste generation, and potential for material diversion. Today's technology challenges include the economical recovery of transuranic elements for recycle/transmutation; and minimizing waste generation (including both high level and low level waste). Priority research efforts revolve around achieving near-zero radioactive off-gas emissions; developing a simplified, single-step

127

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 SECTION A. Project Title: INL - Off-Road ATV Use In Support of Engineering Surveys SECTION B. Project Description The proposed action will allow for off-road ATV use near T-24 and T-25 at the Idaho National Laboratory Site. The ATV(s) will be used to survey in support of engineering design for a proposed upgraded haul road within the INL Site. Currently, an Environmental Assessment is being prepared to address upgrading either T-24 or T-25 to establish a site transportation route for the out-of-commerce shipment of materials and wastes from MFC to other site areas to reduce U.S. Highway 20 road closures, improve safety, and reduce cost. Since off-road use of motorized vehicles is prohibited unless approval is obtained, this Environmental Checklist will document that

128

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 440.2B-1A 9-19-05 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE AVIATION PROGRAM PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (METRICS) for use with DOE O 440.2B, Aviation Management and Safety [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and may not be construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Aviation Management/OMBE/CFO DOE G 440.2B-1A i (and ii) 9-19-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Aviation Program performance indicators interim guide is approved by the Office of Aviation Management (OAM) and is available for use by all DOE and

129

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ICP-12-003 ICP-12-003 SECTION A. Project Title: CPP-684 - Remote Analytical Laboratory Facility Modifications SECTION B. Project Description The proposed activities are intended to render CPP-684 Remote Analytical Laboratory (RAL) as a limited access area by removing existing operational functions that are currently performed in the facility. In general, the activities will involve (1) removing the need for building heat and overall reduction of power consumption; (2) converting the existing fire protection system to an anti-freeze charged system; (3) relocating the Remote Distribution Module (RDM), which is part of installed equipment used for the emergency communication system from CPP-684 to CPP-663; and, if pursued, (4) perform specific tasks which would allow a downgrade CPP-684

130

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16 16 SECTION A. Project Title: GaRDS Vehicle X-Ray System Procurement, Installation and Operations SECTION B. Project Description: . This effort will be to procure, install, and operate a Gamma Radiation Detection System (GaRDS) capable of providing X-Ray images of incoming vehicles and delivery trucks. The scanner will be equipped with a 1 Ci Cobalt-60 gamma source and will be installed in building MFC-736. This security building is located on Taylor Blvd approximately one mile south of the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) and already houses a Vehicle Explosives Detection System equipped with two 50 microgram Cf-252 sources. The purpose of the proposed detection system is to enhance the security capability for MFC facilities, research programs, and personnel.

131

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 SECTION A. Project Title: MFC Dial Room Replacement Project SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project is to construct and operate a new dial room at the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) to continue operation of the telecommunications system at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). As part of the INL Private Branch Exchange (PBX) consolidation effort, the need to replace Central Facilities Area (CFA), Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC), and Power Burst Facility (PBF) PBX switches will eliminate the current switches potential failure and provide the necessary maintainable hardware and software to support INL missions. The project will maintain the existing dial room in the basement of MFC-752 as a splice/conduit/equipment

132

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09-001 09-001 SECTION A. Project Title: ICP Routine Maintenance SECTION B. Project Description The purpose of this document is to address actions that meet the intent of the categorical exclusion (CX) B1.3 as described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. Both typical and non-typical types of actions, such as routine maintenance, minor modifications, and custodial services required to support safe and efficient plant operations even if performed on an infrequent basis are addressed. All of the activities will be performed in support of CWI operations. The actions will occur within site boundaries of the INL and ICP facilities and within leased facilities in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Routine maintenance includes custodial services for buildings, structures, rights-of-way, infrastructures (e.g., pathways, roads, and

133

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 SECTION A. Project Title: INL - Site Wide Well Abandonment Activities SECTION B. Project Description The proposed action will abandon inactive wells and injection wells at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site. Wells and injection wells will be abandoned as per MCP-1442, MCP-3480 and the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) requirements, as applicable. The wells to be abandoned are located both within the INL facility boundaries and outside of the INL facility boundaries. The proposed action will address all classes of wells including Class IV and V injection wells. The wells will be abandoned in accordance with instructions provided in this Environmental Checklist, MCP-3480 and Section 4.5 in MCP-1442, Well Drilling, Maintenance, Surveillance, and Abandonment Activities. The MCPs identify the process to be followed for

134

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-ICP-12-002 SECTION A. Project Title: ICP Routine Maintenance SECTION B. Project Description The purpose of this document is to address actions that meet the intent of the categorical exclusion (CX) B1.3 as described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. Both typical and non-typical types of actions, such as routine maintenance, minor modifications, and custodial services required to support safe and efficient plant operations even if performed on an infrequent basis are addressed. All of the activities will be performed in support of CWI operations. The actions will occur within site boundaries of the INL and ICP facilities and within leased facilities in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Routine maintenance includes custodial services for buildings, structures, rights-of-way,

135

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 SECTION A. Project Title: CFA-696 Power and Plumbing Upgrades SECTION B. Project Description: There is insufficient electrical power in the East Bay and the West Bay of the Central Facility Area (CFA) Transportation Complex to allow the craftsmen to fully utilize the available floor space without the use of extension cords. Additionally, a new hydraulic hose clamper is to be installed in the Parts Room and it needs a dedicated 30A power supply. The craftsmen also need another wash sink in the East Bay. The current method of connecting to the internet using Local Area Network (LAN) cables is cumbersome and inefficient. There is not enough lighting in the north side of the southeast section of the East Bay. This project installs the necessary electrical service, additional plumbing, and wireless internet capability as itemized below:

136

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-ICP-12-002 SECTION A. Project Title: ICP Routine Maintenance SECTION B. Project Description The purpose of this document is to address actions that meet the intent of the categorical exclusion (CX) B1.3 as described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. Both typical and non-typical types of actions, such as routine maintenance, minor modifications, and custodial services required to support safe and efficient plant operations even if performed on an infrequent basis are addressed. All of the activities will be performed in support of CWI operations. The actions will occur within site boundaries of the INL and ICP facilities and within leased facilities in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Routine maintenance includes custodial services for buildings, structures, rights-of-way,

137

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 SECTION A. Project Title: Maintenance and Modification of Well TRA-08 SECTION B. Project Description: TRA-08, a groundwater monitoring well located approximately 1.5 miles south of the ATR Complex was drilled and constructed in 1990. The well is currently used as a groundwater monitoring compliance point for the ATR Complex Cold Waste Pond Industrial Wastewater Reuse Permit (IWRP). It is also used for CERCLA groundwater monitoring by CWI. Over the life of the well, corrosion of the carbon steel casing has resulted in an accumulation of rust flakes in the bottom of the well thus adversely affecting the efficiency of the well. In addition, the water level in the well has dropped from a depth of approximately 477 ft below ground surface at

138

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 __________________________ 1 DOE's strategic plans included the Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap" (2010 Predecisional draft) and reports such as "Facilities for the Future of Nuclear Energy Research: A Twenty-year Outlook". SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Sewage Lagoons Upgrades SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - MFC Sewage Lagoon Upgrades This EC focuses on upgrades to the existing 2.4 acre evaporative sewage lagoons, located north-east and outside of the MFC fenced area. These existing lagoons are currently at capacity with the approximately 800 personnel based at MFC. The number of researchers and operations

139

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10-009 10-009 SECTION A. Project Title Idaho Falls (IF)-608 Uninterrupted Power Supply Upgrade Project SECTION B. Project Description: This project increases the Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) capacity in the IF-608 Information Operations and Research Center (IORC) by removing two existing UPS systems (50 KVA and 36 KVA) and installing a 225 KVA system. A ~15 ton cooling unit will be installed on the roof for heat removal. Associated work will include additional electrical panel(s) and electrical conduit rerouting and installation. Disposal of the existing UPS systems may be required depending on whether they are claimed off the excess list. This work will be performed either under blanket subcontracts or by a separate construction contractor and is planned for completion by

140

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-609 Compressed Air System Drain Line Modification and Valve Replacement SECTION B. Project Description: Due to periods of insufficient water flow to the sewer ponds, the clay liners in the ponds can dry out and crack. This proposed action is to add an additional drain line, which will allow clean well water that has been used to cool compressors to then be drained into the sewer system ponds during low flow periods in order to maintain a higher, more consistent water level. There are no chemicals added to the water. This project will replace the 1.5" compressor oil cooling water solenoid valves with ball valves on M-6, M-7 and M-8; replace the 2" compressor oil and air cooling system flow control valves on M-6, M-8 and M-9; install a new check valve in the compressed air system auxiliary compressor line; install a drain line

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10-009 10-009 SECTION A. Project Title Idaho Falls (IF)-608 Uninterrupted Power Supply Upgrade Project SECTION B. Project Description: This project increases the Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) capacity in the IF-608 Information Operations and Research Center (IORC) by removing two existing UPS systems (50 KVA and 36 KVA) and installing a 225 KVA system. A ~15 ton cooling unit will be installed on the roof for heat removal. Associated work will include additional electrical panel(s) and electrical conduit rerouting and installation. Disposal of the existing UPS systems may be required depending on whether they are claimed off the excess list. This work will be performed either under blanket subcontracts or by a separate construction contractor and is planned for completion by

142

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-609 Compressed Air System Drain Line Modification and Valve Replacement SECTION B. Project Description: Due to periods of insufficient water flow to the sewer ponds, the clay liners in the ponds can dry out and crack. This proposed action is to add an additional drain line, which will allow clean well water that has been used to cool compressors to then be drained into the sewer system ponds during low flow periods in order to maintain a higher, more consistent water level. There are no chemicals added to the water. This project will replace the 1.5" compressor oil cooling water solenoid valves with ball valves on M-6, M-7 and M-8; replace the 2" compressor oil and air cooling system flow control valves on M-6, M-8 and M-9; install a new check valve in the compressed air system auxiliary compressor line; install a drain line

143

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades - Technical Support Building SECTION B. Project Description: Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at the Materials and Fuels Complex has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The INL will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each

144

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Modular Office Units SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at MFC has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require Infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each infrastructure improvement project.

145

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 SECTION A. Project Title: Characterization of Fluidized Beds via Pressure Fluctuation Analysis SECTION B. Project Description: The purpose of this work is to conduct research using pressure as a measure of performance for fluidized beds (spouted, bubbling, or slugging) at the Center for Advanced Energy Studies (CAES). The approach to this research activity consists of two main tasks: 1. Sieving the bed media with a motorized sieve shaker - sintered aluminosilicate spheres (used in the petroleum industry as a proppant to hold fractures open when the rock formation has been hydro-fractured) and assorted seeds (mustard, canola, sorghum, etc.). The aluminosilicate spheres have very little dust potential. Some of the aluminosilicates may have free silica

146

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12 12 SECTION A. Project Title: Reactor Power Up Rate, Compressor Replacement, Neutron Radiography Restore, Liquid Scintillation Counter - Texas A&M University SECTION B. Project Description Texas A&M will replace an existing 54-year old compressor to improve reliability of the reactor operation and purchase a liquid scintillator counter to give the facility the ability to perform tritium analysis. Additionally, under NRC License R-83, Texas A&M will up rate the reactor power from 1MW to 1.5 MW and purchase equipment to restore capability to perform Neutron Radiography. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact Radioactive Material Use - To calibrate the liquid scintillator, radioactive standards are used. Procedures are in place to handle.

147

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Replace 200,000 Gallon Water Storage Tank at MFC SECTION B. Project Description: The project is to replace the current 200,000 gallon potable water tank at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) with a new 300,000 gallon water tank. The existing tank and foundation will be removed and the waste materials managed and disposed under the direction of Waste Generator Services (WGS). The installation area for the new tank will be excavated and the new tank put in place. The new tank will be connected to the existing water system and will be coated on both exterior and interior surfaces to prevent corrosion. All valves and lines will be closed off to the construction area until the new tank is in place and the valves reconnected.

148

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Modular Office Units SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at MFC has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require Infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each infrastructure improvement project.

149

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 SECTION A. Project Title: Maintenance and Modification of Well TRA-08 SECTION B. Project Description: TRA-08, a groundwater monitoring well located approximately 1.5 miles south of the ATR Complex was drilled and constructed in 1990. The well is currently used as a groundwater monitoring compliance point for the ATR Complex Cold Waste Pond Industrial Wastewater Reuse Permit (IWRP). It is also used for CERCLA groundwater monitoring by CWI. Over the life of the well, corrosion of the carbon steel casing has resulted in an accumulation of rust flakes in the bottom of the well thus adversely affecting the efficiency of the well. In addition, the water level in the well has dropped from a depth of approximately 477 ft below ground surface at

150

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-ICP-12-005 SECTION A. Project Title: INTEC - U-233 Waste Stream Disposition SECTION B. Project Description The proposed action will transfer 171 drums of U-233 waste from the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) to INTEC for verification, treatment, and repackaging for final disposition at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The U233 drums are a portion of waste historically managed as transuranic as part of the 1995 Idaho Settlement Agreement.The waste management actions will be performed in CPP-659 or the Radioactive Mixed Waste Staging Facility (CPP-1617). The bulk of the U-233 waste is from the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory and consists of U-233/Th-232 contaminated materials (minor amounts of enriched, depleted and natural powders) generated in the 1970's during development of a

151

Date:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1.45 10.06 0.99 0.04786 2.85 0.13 1.30 Froude Number Flow Type Notes Messages 0.66 Subcritical 0.64 Subcritical 0.41 Subcritical 0.58 Subcritical 0.48 Subcritical 0.42...

152

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

understand what is required to be a nuclear supplier. 6. Gen IV Fabrication Centric Roadmap The objective of this program is to develop a succinct document that will allow...

153

Date  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

that Sandia contracts are settled for a reasonable amount and that no instances of fraud related to these contracts is apparent. We will not report on the adequacy of your...

154

DATE:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 E-2 IWFDP Volume 1 (Process Strategy) provides the basis for how the double-shell tanks (DST) will be used to stage and deliver waste feed to the WTP. This volume provides an...

155

DATE:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of approximately 55 Mgal 1 of radioactive waste contained in the Hanford Site waste tanks and closure of all the tanks and associated facilities. The Hanford Federal Facility...

156

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

operations (such as preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis); and small-scale pilot projects (generally less than 2 years) frequently conducted to verify a...

157

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

(w 39 fusrap6 I FROM: Ed Mitchellzm SUBJECT: Elimination Recommendation for American Machine and Foundry in New York City The purpose of this note is to provide the following...

158

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and repairing wastewater systems lines and connections that could impact the discharge to wastewater systems. 8. Drinking Water Contamination - Performing maintenance activities on...

159

DATE:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited By Janis D. Aardal at 1:25 pm, Jan 31, 2013 DOERL-2001-41 Revision 6 SITEWIDE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS PLAN FOR HANFORD CERCLA RESPONSE...

160

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

buildings"..., and Overarching EC INL-05-002 "Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Program ... Justification: Removal of the interior walls and mezzanines will be a...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DATE:  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Corporations Section 743 Any Payment for the Election for a Federal Office or to a Political Committee Section 3003 Reporting on Conference Spending 2 The FAL addresses the...

162

DATE:  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Corporations * Section 735 Any Payment for the Election for a Federal Office or to a Political Committee * Section 742 Reporting on Conference Spending The FAL addresses the...

163

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Impact: Generating and Managing Waste - The proposed activity would generate scrap metal and industrial waste. Project personnel will contact Waste Generator Services (WGS) to...

164

DATE:  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Letter (AL) 2013-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-05 provide Contracting Officers with notice of the recently passed, Whistleblower Protection Enhancement...

165

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

will rest on a new concrete foundation and house the necessary heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), electrical, life safety and communications systems but will not...

166

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mixed Waste Staging Facility (CPP-1617). The bulk of the U-233 waste is from the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory and consists of U-233Th-232 contaminated materials (minor...

167

DATE:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, Pub. L. No. 113-76. SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2014-04 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2014-01 provides implementing...

168

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Building The INL must operate and maintain infrastructure and facilities to support the nuclear energy research, development, demonstration, and commercial application programs,...

169

DATE:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

es...A-i Appendix B Estimation of Selected Single-Shell Tank Heat Generation Rates...B-i RPP-RPT-54981, Revision 0 ii List of...

170

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SECTION B. Project Description The proposed activities are intended to render CPP-684 Remote Analytical Laboratory (RAL) as a limited access area by removing existing...

171

DATE:  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

has been revised. The subject form has been posted on the DOE Financial Assistance web page on the Recipients Page under the Financial Assistance Forms and Information for...

172

DATE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

A. Project Title: Innovative Manufacturing Process for Improving the ErosionCorrosion Resistance of Power Plant Components via Powder Metallurgy & Hot Isostatic Processing...

173

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 01 SECTION A. Project Title: Nuclear Fabrication Consortium SECTION B. Project Description The mission of the NFC will be accomplished through both public and private funding. The list below outlines the programs that have identified for initiation under the initial DOE funding. Additional programs are envisioned and will be proposed, subject to any applicable budget constraints, to DOE-NE as they become known to EWI, the NFC, and DOE. 1. Automation of Advanced Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Technologies The objective of the first phase of this project is to improve the reliability of NDE methods by increasing the automation content. 2. Advanced Laser Technology The objective is to identify laser applications that offer significant productivity gains over the current processes being used, and

174

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 __________________________ 1 DOE's strategic plans included the Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap" (2010 Predecisional draft) and reports such as "Facilities for the Future of Nuclear Energy Research: A Twenty-year Outlook". SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Sewage Lagoons Upgrades SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - MFC Sewage Lagoon Upgrades This EC focuses on upgrades to the existing 2.4 acre evaporative sewage lagoons, located north-east and outside of the MFC fenced area. These existing lagoons are currently at capacity with the approximately 800 personnel based at MFC. The number of researchers and operations

175

DATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Replace 200,000 Gallon Water Storage Tank at MFC SECTION B. Project Description: The project is to replace the current 200,000 gallon potable water tank at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) with a new 300,000 gallon water tank. The existing tank and foundation will be removed and the waste materials managed and disposed under the direction of Waste Generator Services (WGS). The installation area for the new tank will be excavated and the new tank put in place. The new tank will be connected to the existing water system and will be coated on both exterior and interior surfaces to prevent corrosion. All valves and lines will be closed off to the construction area until the new tank is in place and the valves reconnected.

176

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Rev. No.: 0) includes Record of Technical Change No. 1 (dated 9/17/2002)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 5 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 5 consists of eight Corrective Action Sites (CASs): 05-15-01, Sanitary Landfill; 05-16-01, Landfill; 06-08-01, Landfill; 06-15-02, Sanitary Landfill; 06-15-03, Sanitary Landfill; 12-15-01, Sanitary Landfill; 20-15-01, Landfill; 23-15-03, Disposal Site. Located between Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS), CAU 5 consists of unlined landfills used in support of disposal operations between 1952 and 1992. Large volumes of solid waste were produced from the projects which used the CAU 5 landfills. Waste disposed in these landfills may be present without appropriate controls (i.e., use restrictions, adequate cover) and hazardous and/or radioactive constituents may be present at concentrations and locations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and/or the environment. During the 1992 to 1995 time frame, the NTS was used for various research and development projects including nuclear weapons testing. Instead of managing solid waste at one or two disposal sites, the practice on the NTS was to dispose of solid waste in the vicinity of the project. A review of historical documentation, process knowledge, personal interviews, and inferred activities associated with this CAU identified the following as potential contaminants of concern: volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel- and gasoline-range organics), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Metals, plus nickel and zinc. A two-phase approach has been selected to collect information and generate data to satisfy needed resolution criteria and resolve the decision statements. Phase I will concentrate on geophysical surveys to confirm the presence or absence of disposed waste within a CAS and verify the boundaries of disposal areas; penetrate disposal feature covers via excavation and/or drilling; perform geodetic surveys; and be used to collect both soil and environmental samples for laboratory analyses. Phase II will deal only with those CASs where a contaminant of concern has been identified. This phase will involve the collection of additional soil and/or environmental samples for laboratory analyses. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

IT Corporation, Las Vegas, NV

2002-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

177

Radiokrypton dating finally takes off  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...dating, based on the well-known radioactive decay...essentially has a single, well-mixed, and steady source, the...fortunately it works well for noble gases...Isolation Pilot Plant, New Mexico . J Contam Hydrol 160...radionuclides in Yellowstone geothermal gas emissions: A reconnaissance...

Werner Aeschbach-Hertig

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30, 2013 30, 2013 CX-010821: Categorical Exclusion Determination Manufacturing Process for Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Integrated Substrate CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 30, 2013 CX-010771: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation of National and Homeland Security (N&HS) activities from Transient Reactor Experiment and Test Facility (TREAT) to Critical Infrastructure Test Range Complex (CITRC) CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy July 30, 2013 CX-010846: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Stud, Shims, and Nut in the L-Basin 70-Ton Cask Lid Support Structure CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): South Carolina

179

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2009 6, 2009 CX-000540: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Americium/Curium separations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 16, 2009 CX-006654: Categorical Exclusion Determination B-1-28 Test Site Reclamation CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.28, B6.1 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC November 16, 2009 CX-006660: Categorical Exclusion Determination Down Hole Seismic Source 68-SX-11 CX(s) Applied: B3.7, B5.12 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC November 16, 2009 CX-006664: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center Process Improvement Old Pipe Yard Clean Up

180

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006069: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

OTS NOTE DATE: TO: FROM:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TO: FROM: March 25, 1991 A. Williams D. stout P SUBJECT: Elimination Recommendation for the Star Cutter Corporation The .attached memorandum and supporting documents are the basis for our recommendation to eliminate the former Star Cutter Corporation site from further consideration under FUSRAP. The site is located in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Documents discovered to date which indicate use or handling of radioactive material by Star Cutter consist of two Analytical Data Sheets, dated June 29, 1956, prepared by the National Lead Company of Ohio (NLO), an Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) prime contractor. The data sheets report the results of radiological monitoring conducted during operation of an oil- cooled drilling/hollowing machine. The sheets record measurements during

182

Save the Date - NTSF 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Save the Date Save the Date U.S. Department of Energy National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 14-16 th , 2013 Buffalo, New York Please mark your calendar to attend the next meeting of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) scheduled for May 14-16, 2013. This annual event will be held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, located near the downtown business and entertainment districts in Buffalo, New York. The 2013 meeting is co-sponsored by DOE's Offices of Environmental Management and Nuclear Energy and follows several highly successful yearly gatherings. It is co-hosted by the Council of State Governments Eastern Regional Conference and the Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force.

183

Request Log Closedl Date Yes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 FOIA 6 FOIA - Request Log Closedl Date Yes 01 127106 Yes 02/23/06 Yes 04/05/06 Yes 04/03/06 Yes 04/03/06 Yes 05/22/06 Yes 35/30/06 - No. - 00 1 - 002 - 003 - 004 005 006 - 307 - Dated 01 125106 0211 6106 03/29/06 03/31 106 14/03/06 1511 8/06 )5/22/06 Date Rec'd 0 I I2 5/06 02/23/06 03130/06 0313 1 106 04/03/06 05/22/06 05/22/06 HQ or Dir. Direct Transfer from HQ Direct Trans from HQ Direct Direct Transfer 'rom HQ Subject Requesting a list of all your Procurement card holders Requesting copies of any and all Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests submitted to the Department of Energy (DOE) by Donna Wright, the Bradenton Herald, or any other individual that requested documentation or information pertaining to the Loral American Beryllium Corporation (also known as the

184

Design and testing of a procedure for evaluating fuel-efficient crankcase lubricants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Experiments were conducted to design and evaluate a procedure for evaluating the fuel efficiency characteristics of crankcase lubricants using the driving cycles of the 1975 Federal Test Procedure and the Highway Fuel Economy Test. Most of the test protocol was based on guidelines proposed by the American Society for Testing and Materials. Three crankcase lubricants and five oil supplements, as well as a baseline lubricant, were used in eight 1980 model-year vehicles of identical make. The vehicles were operated at 75/sup 0/F (24/sup 0/C) in closely controlled chassis dynamometer tests designed to detect small changes in fuel efficiency. Results from these tests showed measurable increases in fuel economy of 0 to 6% with the test lubricants when compared to a common SAE 30 grade oil. These results are not definitive because of lack of quantification of mileage accumulation effects. The test protocol did reduce measurement variability greatly; this procedure can be applied to evaluation of fuel-efficient oils using larger test fleets. A good potential exists for improving the fuel economy of the US automotive fleet. Because of the large quantities of petroleum consumed in the automotive sector, this potential savings translates into conserving a very significant quantity of petroleum.

Naman, T.M.

1981-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Revision 2 Effective October 1, 2007 Braking Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date: _________ Roberta Brayer Approved by: _________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald Karner Procedure ETA-HTP06 Revision 2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Objectives 1 2. Purpose 1 3. Documentation 1 4. Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 1 5. Testing Activity Requirements 3 5.3 Dry Controlled Test 4 6. Glossary 5 7. References 7 Appendices Appendix A - Handling Pad Test Data Sheet 8

186

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2010 1, 2010 CX-004065: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Pilot Testing of a Membrane System for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 10/01/2010 Location(s): Palo Alto, California Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 1, 2010 CX-004064: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Pilot Testing of a Membrane System for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 10/01/2010 Location(s): Holbrook, Arizona Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 1, 2010 CX-004063: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Pilot Testing of a Membrane System

187

Updated: September, 2012 Intent to Hold FPM Course/Test  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Updated: September, 2012 FORM A Intent to Hold FPM Course/Test Which course are you conducting? (check only one) 2-day course 1-day course Test only Re-Test only Test & Re-Test Food Handlers What date(s) are you conducting the training/testing? ______________________________ (mm

188

Test Automation Test Automation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Test Automation Test Automation Mohammad Mousavi Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands Software Testing 2013 Mousavi: Test Automation #12;Test Automation Outline Test Automation Mousavi: Test Automation #12;Test Automation Why? Challenges of Manual Testing Test-case design: Choosing inputs

Mousavi, Mohammad

189

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Dodge Vehicles 2 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2012 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2012 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Dodge Avenger Gas 19 City 22 Combined 29 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 21 Highway 2012 Dodge Caliber 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Dodge Caliber 23 City 24 Combined 27 Highway 2012 Dodge Caliber 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Dodge Caliber 24

190

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Toyota Vehicles 5 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 20 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 19 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 1985 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 18 City 19 Combined 20 Highway 1985 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Toyota Cab Chassis 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Toyota Cab Chassis 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

191

Gas Mileage of 1990 Vehicles by Volvo  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

90 Volvo Vehicles 90 Volvo Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1990 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Volvo 240 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1990 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Volvo 240 19 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 1990 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Volvo 240 17 City 19 Combined 21 Highway 1990 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Volvo 240 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 1990 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Volvo 240 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1990 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Volvo 240 19 City 21 Combined 26

192

Gas Mileage of 1990 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

90 Toyota Vehicles 90 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1990 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 16 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1990 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1990 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 17 City 18 Combined 19 Highway 1990 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1990 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 18

193

Gas Mileage of 1994 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Mercury Vehicles 4 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1994 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Mercury Capri 20 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 1994 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Mercury Capri 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1994 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Mercury Capri 22 City 24 Combined 28 Highway 1994 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Mercury Cougar 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1994 Mercury Cougar 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Mercury Cougar 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1994 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Mercury Grand Marquis 16

194

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Ford Vehicles 4 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 12 City 13 Combined 13 Highway 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 13 City 14 Combined 15 Highway 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 11 City 11 Combined 12 Highway 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 11 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Ford Bronco 4WD 11

195

Gas Mileage of 2000 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2000 Ford Vehicles 2000 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2000 Ford Contour 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Ford Contour View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 23 Combined 28 Highway 2000 Ford Contour 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Ford Contour 21 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2000 Ford Contour 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Ford Contour 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2000 Ford Contour 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Ford Contour 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2000 Ford Crown Victoria 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Ford Crown Victoria View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2000 Ford Crown Victoria CNG 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, CNG

196

Gas Mileage of 1992 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Chevrolet Vehicles 2 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1992 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1992 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 14

197

Gas Mileage of 1986 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Mercury Vehicles 6 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1986 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Mercury Capri 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1986 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Mercury Capri 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1986 Mercury Capri 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Mercury Capri 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1986 Mercury Capri 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Mercury Capri 15 City 18 Combined 24 Highway 1986 Mercury Capri 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Mercury Capri View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1986 Mercury Cougar 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

198

Gas Mileage of 2002 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Mercury Vehicles 2 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2002 Mercury Cougar 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2002 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Mercury Cougar 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2002 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Mercury Cougar 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2002 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2002 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 14 City

199

Gas Mileage of 1986 Vehicles by Isuzu  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Isuzu Vehicles 6 Isuzu Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1986 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Isuzu I-Mark 27 City 29 Combined 31 Highway 1986 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Isuzu I-Mark 32 City 34 Combined 38 Highway 1986 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Isuzu I-Mark 29 City 32 Combined 36 Highway 1986 Isuzu Impulse 4 cyl, 1.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Isuzu Impulse 18 City 20 Combined 22 Highway 1986 Isuzu Impulse 4 cyl, 1.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Isuzu Impulse 19 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1986 Isuzu Impulse 4 cyl, 1.9 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Isuzu Impulse 18 City 21 Combined 25

200

Gas Mileage of 1995 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Dodge Vehicles 5 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1995 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Dodge Avenger 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 1995 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Dodge Avenger 19 City 22 Combined 29 Highway 1995 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Dodge Avenger 19 City 23 Combined 30 Highway 1995 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Dodge Avenger 19 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 1995 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Dodge Avenger 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 1995 Dodge B1500/B2500 Van 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Dodge B1500/B2500 Van 2WD

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Gas Mileage of 1993 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 GMC Vehicles 3 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1993 GMC Jimmy 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1993 GMC Jimmy 2WD 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1993 GMC Jimmy 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 GMC Jimmy 2WD 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1993 GMC Jimmy 4WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1993 GMC Jimmy 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1993 GMC Jimmy 4WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 GMC Jimmy 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1993 GMC Rally G15/25 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 GMC Rally G15/25 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1993 GMC Rally G15/25 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

202

Gas Mileage of 2007 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Ford Vehicles 7 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2007 Ford Crown Victoria View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2007 Ford Crown Victoria View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2007 Ford Edge AWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2007 Ford Edge AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2007 Ford Edge FWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2007 Ford Edge FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 23

203

Gas Mileage of 2010 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Toyota Vehicles 0 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2010 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2010 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 2010 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2010 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2010 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Toyota Avalon View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

204

Gas Mileage of 1999 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1999 Dodge Vehicles 1999 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1999 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1999 Dodge Avenger 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway 1999 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1999 Dodge Avenger 19 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 1999 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1999 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 1999 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1999 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 16 Highway 1999 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1999 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 12 City 14 Combined 18

205

Gas Mileage of 2007 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Toyota Vehicles 7 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2007 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2007 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 2007 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2007 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 2007 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2007 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 2007 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2007 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2007 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline

206

Gas Mileage of 2001 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Chevrolet Vehicles 1 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2001 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 2001 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 2001 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 2001 Chevrolet Astro AWD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Chevrolet Astro AWD (passenger) 13 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 2001 Chevrolet Blazer 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

207

Gas Mileage of 2001 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Ford Vehicles 1 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2001 Ford Crown Victoria 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Ford Crown Victoria View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2001 Ford Crown Victoria CNG 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, CNG Compare 2001 Ford Crown Victoria CNG 14 City 16 Combined 21 Highway 2001 Ford Crown Victoria Police 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Ford Crown Victoria Police 14 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 2001 Ford E150 Club Wagon 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Ford E150 Club Wagon 13 City 14 Combined 18 Highway 2001 Ford E150 Club Wagon 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Ford E150 Club Wagon 13 City 15 Combined 18

208

Gas Mileage of 2006 Vehicles by Pontiac  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Pontiac Vehicles 6 Pontiac Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2006 Pontiac G6 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Pontiac G6 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2006 Pontiac G6 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Pontiac G6 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 2006 Pontiac G6 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S4), Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Pontiac G6 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2006 Pontiac G6 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Pontiac G6 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 26 Highway 2006 Pontiac G6 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic (S4), Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Pontiac G6

209

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Isuzu  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Isuzu Vehicles 5 Isuzu Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Isuzu 750C/I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Isuzu 750C/I-Mark 28 City 30 Combined 32 Highway 1985 Isuzu 750C/I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Isuzu 750C/I-Mark 32 City 35 Combined 39 Highway 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 21 City 22 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 19 City 20 Combined 22 Highway 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Isuzu I-Mark 21

210

Gas Mileage of 1993 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Ford Vehicles 3 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1993 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Ford Aerostar Van 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1993 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Ford Aerostar Van 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1993 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Ford Aerostar Van View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1993 Ford Aerostar Van AWD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Ford Aerostar Van AWD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1993 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Ford Aerostar Wagon 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1993 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

211

Gas Mileage of 1987 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 GMC Vehicles 7 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 16 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 13 City 14 Combined 16 Highway 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 GMC Caballero Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1987 GMC G15/25 Rally 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 GMC G15/25 Rally 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway

212

Gas Mileage of 2005 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 BMW Vehicles 5 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2005 BMW 325ci 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 BMW 325ci View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2005 BMW 325ci 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S5), Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 BMW 325ci 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2005 BMW 325ci Convertible 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 BMW 325ci Convertible 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2005 BMW 325ci Convertible 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S5), Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 BMW 325ci Convertible View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2005 BMW 325i 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 BMW 325i 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2005 BMW 325i 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S5), Premium Gasoline

213

Gas Mileage of 1989 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

89 Toyota Vehicles 89 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1989 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1989 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1989 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 16 City 17 Combined 18 Highway 1989 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1989 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 14 City 15 Combined 17

214

Gas Mileage of 2013 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Dodge Vehicles 3 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2013 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2013 Dodge Avenger Gas 19 City 22 Combined 29 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 21 Highway 2013 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City 23 Combined 31 Highway 2013 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Dodge Avenger 21 City 24 Combined 29 Highway 2013 Dodge Challenger 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Midgrade Gasoline Compare 2013 Dodge Challenger 16 City 19 Combined 25 Highway 2013 Dodge Challenger 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Dodge Challenger 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2013 Dodge Challenger 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline

215

Gas Mileage of 2005 Vehicles by Audi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Audi Vehicles 5 Audi Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2005 Audi A4 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 Audi A4 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City 23 Combined 27 Highway 2005 Audi A4 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 Audi A4 20 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 2005 Audi A4 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 Audi A4 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2005 Audi A4 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 Audi A4 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2005 Audi A4 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2005 Audi A4 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City 24 Combined 31

216

Gas Mileage of 2000 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2000 Mercury Vehicles 2000 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2000 Mercury Cougar 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Mercury Cougar 21 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2000 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2000 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2000 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

217

Gas Mileage of 2003 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Dodge Vehicles 3 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2003 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2003 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2003 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD 6 cyl, 3.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2003 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2003 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan AWD 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

218

Gas Mileage of 2014 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 GMC Vehicles 4 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2014 GMC Acadia AWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 GMC Acadia AWD 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2014 GMC Acadia FWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 GMC Acadia FWD 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2014 GMC Savana 1500 AWD (cargo) 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2014 GMC Savana 1500 AWD (cargo) Gas 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway E85 10 City 11 Combined 12 Highway 2014 GMC Savana 1500 AWD Conversion (cargo) 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2014 GMC Savana 1500 AWD Conversion (cargo) Gas 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2014 GMC Savana 1500 2WD (Passenger) 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85

219

Gas Mileage of 1990 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Chevrolet Vehicles 0 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1990 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 15

220

Gas Mileage of 2001 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 BMW Vehicles 1 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2001 BMW 325ci 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2001 BMW 325ci View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2001 BMW 325ci 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2001 BMW 325ci View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2001 BMW 325ci Convertible 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2001 BMW 325ci Convertible View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2001 BMW 325ci Convertible 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2001 BMW 325ci Convertible View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2001 BMW 325i 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 5-spd, Premium Gasoline

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by Chrysler  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Chrysler Vehicles 8 Chrysler Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 Chrysler 300 AWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chrysler 300 AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2008 Chrysler 300 AWD 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chrysler 300 AWD 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2008 Chrysler 300/SRT-8 6 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chrysler 300/SRT-8 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2008 Chrysler 300/SRT-8 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chrysler 300/SRT-8 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2008 Chrysler 300/SRT-8 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chrysler 300/SRT-8 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2008 Chrysler 300/SRT-8 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

222

Gas Mileage of 1991 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Mercury Vehicles 1 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1991 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Mercury Capri 21 City 22 Combined 24 Highway 1991 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Mercury Capri View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1991 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Mercury Capri 22 City 24 Combined 28 Highway 1991 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Mercury Cougar 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 1991 Mercury Cougar 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1991 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

223

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 GMC Vehicles 8 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 GMC Acadia AWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 GMC Acadia AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2008 GMC Acadia FWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 GMC Acadia FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2008 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 GMC Canyon 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2008 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 GMC Canyon 2WD 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2008 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 GMC Canyon 2WD

224

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Plymouth  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Plymouth Vehicles 5 Plymouth Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 20 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 18 City 19 Combined 21 Highway 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 19 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1985 Plymouth Caravelle 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

225

Gas Mileage of 1990 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 GMC Vehicles 0 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 15 Combined 16 Highway 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 13 City 13 Combined 14 Highway 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1990 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

226

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Jeep  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Jeep Vehicles 5 Jeep Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Jeep CJ7 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Jeep CJ7 17 City 18 Combined 19 Highway 1985 Jeep CJ7 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Jeep CJ7 17 City 18 Combined 19 Highway 1985 Jeep CJ7 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Jeep CJ7 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1985 Jeep CJ7 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Jeep CJ7 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 1985 Jeep CJ7 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Jeep CJ7 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1985 Jeep CJ7 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

227

Gas Mileage of 2010 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Ford Vehicles 0 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2010 Ford Crown Victoria FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2010 Ford Crown Victoria FFV Gas 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway E85 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2010 Ford Edge AWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Ford Edge AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2010 Ford Edge FWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Ford Edge FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2010 Ford Escape 4WD 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Ford Escape 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2010 Ford Escape 4WD FFV 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85

228

Gas Mileage of 2011 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 GMC Vehicles 1 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2011 GMC Acadia AWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 GMC Acadia AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2011 GMC Acadia FWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 GMC Acadia FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2011 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 GMC Canyon 2WD 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2011 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 GMC Canyon 2WD 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2011 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 GMC Canyon 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2011 GMC Canyon 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

229

Gas Mileage of 2004 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 BMW Vehicles 4 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2004 BMW 325ci 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 BMW 325ci 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2004 BMW 325ci 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S5), Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 BMW 325ci View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2004 BMW 325ci 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 BMW 325ci 19 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2004 BMW 325ci Convertible 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 BMW 325ci Convertible 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2004 BMW 325ci Convertible 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S5), Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 BMW 325ci Convertible 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2004 BMW 325ci Convertible 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline

230

Gas Mileage of 2005 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 GMC Vehicles 5 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 GMC Canyon 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2005 GMC Canyon 4WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 GMC Canyon 4WD 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 2005 GMC Canyon 4WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

231

Gas Mileage of 2009 Vehicles by Pontiac  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 Pontiac Vehicles 9 Pontiac Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 25 City 28 Combined 34 Highway 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave 27 City 30 Combined 34 Highway 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave 5 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave 5 25 City 28 Combined 34 Highway 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave 5 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Pontiac G3 Wave 5 27 City 30 Combined 34 Highway 2009 Pontiac G5 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Pontiac G5 25 City 29 Combined 35 Highway 2009 Pontiac G5 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

232

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Mercury Vehicles 5 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mercury Capri 19 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mercury Capri 21 City 23 Combined 27 Highway 1985 Mercury Capri 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mercury Capri 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1985 Mercury Capri 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mercury Capri 15 City 17 Combined 22 Highway 1985 Mercury Capri 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mercury Capri 15 City 17 Combined 22 Highway 1985 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mercury Capri 18 City

233

Gas Mileage of 2004 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Mercury Vehicles 4 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2004 Mercury Marauder 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 Mercury Marauder View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 2004 Mercury Monterey Wagon FWD 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Mercury Monterey Wagon FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 2004 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 13 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 2004 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

234

Gas Mileage of 1997 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Mercury Vehicles 7 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1997 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1997 Mercury Cougar 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1997 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1997 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 1997 Mercury Mountaineer 4WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

235

Gas Mileage of 1990 Vehicles by Geo  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

90 Geo Vehicles 90 Geo Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1990 Geo Metro 3 cyl, 1.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Geo Metro 31 City 33 Combined 36 Highway 1990 Geo Metro 3 cyl, 1.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Geo Metro View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 38 City 41 Combined 45 Highway 1990 Geo Metro LSI 3 cyl, 1.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Geo Metro LSI 31 City 33 Combined 35 Highway 1990 Geo Metro LSI 3 cyl, 1.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Geo Metro LSI 38 City 40 Combined 44 Highway 1990 Geo Metro LSI Convertible 3 cyl, 1.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Geo Metro LSI Convertible 28 City 30 Combined 33 Highway 1990 Geo Metro LSI Convertible 3 cyl, 1.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

236

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Porsche  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Porsche Vehicles 2 Porsche Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS Cabriolet 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS Cabriolet 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS Cabriolet 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Porsche 911 C4 GTS Cabriolet 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2012 Porsche 911 Carrera 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Porsche 911 Carrera 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway 2012 Porsche 911 Carrera 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline

237

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Dodge Vehicles 8 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2008 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 26 Highway 2008 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2008 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway E85 13 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2008 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway 2008 Dodge Avenger AWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline

238

Gas Mileage of 1995 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Mercury Vehicles 5 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1995 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Mercury Cougar 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1995 Mercury Cougar 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1995 Mercury Mystique 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Mercury Mystique View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 29 Highway 1995 Mercury Mystique 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

239

Gas Mileage of 2014 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Ford Vehicles 4 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2014 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2014 Ford E150 Van FFV Gas 12 City 14 Combined 16 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2014 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2014 Ford E150 Van FFV Gas 13 City 15 Combined 16 Highway E85 10 City 11 Combined 12 Highway 2014 Ford E150 Wagon FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2014 Ford E150 Wagon FFV Gas 12 City 13 Combined 16 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2014 Ford E150 Wagon FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2014 Ford E150 Wagon FFV Gas 13 City 14 Combined 16 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2014 Ford E250 Van FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85

240

Gas Mileage of 1989 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 Mercury Vehicles 9 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1989 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 1989 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1989 Mercury Cougar 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1989 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1989 Mercury Cougar 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1989 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1989 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon 15

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by Audi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Audi Vehicles 8 Audi Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 Audi A3 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Audi A3 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 22 City 25 Combined 29 Highway 2008 Audi A3 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Audi A3 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City 24 Combined 29 Highway 2008 Audi A3 quattro 6 cyl, 3.2 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Audi A3 quattro 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2008 Audi A4 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Audi A4 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2008 Audi A4 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Audi A4 20 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2008 Audi A4 6 cyl, 3.1 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Premium Gasoline

242

Gas Mileage of 2011 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Toyota Vehicles 1 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2011 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 18 City 19 Combined 21 Highway 2011 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2011 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2011 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2011 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Toyota Avalon View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 20 City

243

Gas Mileage of 2010 Vehicles by Pontiac  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 Pontiac Vehicles 10 Pontiac Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2010 Pontiac G3 (3-Door) 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Pontiac G3 (3-Door) 25 City 28 Combined 34 Highway 2010 Pontiac G3 (3-Door) 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Pontiac G3 (3-Door) 27 City 30 Combined 35 Highway 2010 Pontiac G3 (5-Door) 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Pontiac G3 (5-Door) 25 City 28 Combined 34 Highway 2010 Pontiac G3 (5-Door) 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Pontiac G3 (5-Door) 27 City 30 Combined 35 Highway 2010 Pontiac G5 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Pontiac G5 24 City 27 Combined 33 Highway 2010 Pontiac G5 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

244

Gas Mileage of 1988 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 BMW Vehicles 8 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1988 BMW 3 Series 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1988 BMW 3 Series 15 City 18 Combined 26 Highway 1988 BMW 3 Series 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1988 BMW 3 Series 15 City 18 Combined 26 Highway 1988 BMW 3 Series 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 BMW 3 Series 16 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 1988 BMW 3 Series 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 BMW 3 Series 17 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 1988 BMW 3 Series 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 BMW 3 Series View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1988 BMW 3 Series 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 BMW 3 Series 16

245

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Pontiac  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Pontiac Vehicles 4 Pontiac Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Pontiac 1000 23 City 26 Combined 30 Highway 1984 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Pontiac 1000 24 City 27 Combined 31 Highway 1984 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Pontiac 1000 24 City 27 Combined 33 Highway 1984 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Pontiac 1000 28 City 30 Combined 33 Highway 1984 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Pontiac 1000 33 City 36 Combined 42 Highway 1984 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Pontiac 1000 22 City 24 Combined 27 Highway 1984 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

246

Gas Mileage of 2006 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Toyota Vehicles 6 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2006 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 2006 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2006 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 2006 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2006 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline

247

Gas Mileage of 1995 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 GMC Vehicles 5 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1995 GMC Jimmy 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 GMC Jimmy 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1995 GMC Jimmy 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 GMC Jimmy 2WD 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1995 GMC Jimmy 4WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 GMC Jimmy 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1995 GMC Jimmy 4WD 6 cyl, 5.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 GMC Jimmy 4WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1995 GMC Pickup Trucks 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 GMC Pickup Trucks 13 City 14 Combined 15 Highway 1995 GMC Rally G15/25 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

248

Gas Mileage of 1993 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Mercury Vehicles 3 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1993 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Mercury Capri 20 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 1993 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Mercury Capri View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1993 Mercury Capri 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Mercury Capri View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 22 City 24 Combined 28 Highway 1993 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Mercury Cougar 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1993 Mercury Cougar 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15

249

Gas Mileage of 1994 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Dodge Vehicles 4 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 11 City 12 Combined 14 Highway 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 12 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 11 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Wagon 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Dodge B150/B250 Wagon 2WD 14

250

Gas Mileage of 2003 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Ford Vehicles 3 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2003 Ford Crown Victoria 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Ford Crown Victoria View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2003 Ford Crown Victoria CNG 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, CNG Compare 2003 Ford Crown Victoria CNG 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Police 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Police View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2003 Ford E150 Club Wagon 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Ford E150 Club Wagon 12 City 14 Combined 16 Highway 2003 Ford E150 Club Wagon 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Ford E150 Club Wagon 13

251

Gas Mileage of 2011 Vehicles by Nissan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Nissan Vehicles 1 Nissan Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2011 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 Nissan 370Z 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2011 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 Nissan 370Z 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2011 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 Nissan 370Z Roadster 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2011 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 Nissan 370Z Roadster 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2011 Nissan Altima 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Auto(AV-S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Nissan Altima View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 23 City 27 Combined 32 Highway 2011 Nissan Altima 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Auto(AV-S6), Regular Gasoline

252

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Dodge Vehicles 5 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1985 Dodge 600 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1985 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Dodge 600 20 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 1985 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Dodge 600 18 City 19 Combined 21 Highway 1985 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1985 Dodge 600 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1985 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Dodge 600 19 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Dodge 600 18 City 19 Combined 21 Highway 1985 Dodge 600 Convertible 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline

253

Gas Mileage of 1992 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Dodge Vehicles 2 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 14 City 14 Combined 16 Highway 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 11 City 12 Combined 12 Highway 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 11 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Dodge B150/B250 Van 2WD 10

254

Gas Mileage of 1995 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Toyota Vehicles 5 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1995 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1995 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1995 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 12 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 1995 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 13 City 14 Combined 16 Highway 1995 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

255

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Ford Vehicles 5 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 13 City 13 Combined 13 Highway 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 17 Highway 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 12 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 11 City 12 Combined 13 Highway 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD 8 cyl, 5.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Ford Bronco 4WD

256

Gas Mileage of 2000 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Dodge Vehicles 0 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2000 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2000 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 13 City 14 Combined 16 Highway 2000 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2000 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Dodge B1500 Van 2WD 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2000 Dodge B1500 Wagon 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Dodge B1500 Wagon 2WD 13

257

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Nissan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Nissan Vehicles 2 Nissan Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Nissan 370Z 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2012 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Nissan 370Z 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2012 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Nissan 370Z Roadster 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2012 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Nissan 370Z Roadster 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2012 Nissan Altima 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Auto(AV-S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Nissan Altima View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 23 City 27 Combined 32 Highway 2012 Nissan Altima 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Auto(AV-S6), Regular Gasoline

258

Gas Mileage of 1990 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

90 Dodge Vehicles 90 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1990 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 11 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 1990 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 10 City 11 Combined 13 Highway 1990 Dodge AW100/AW150 Ramcharger 4WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Dodge AW100/AW150 Ramcharger 4WD 10 City 11 Combined 13 Highway 1990 Dodge AW100/AW150 Ramcharger 4WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Dodge AW100/AW150 Ramcharger 4WD 11 City 12 Combined 14 Highway 1990 Dodge AW100/AW150 Ramcharger 4WD 8 cyl, 5.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

259

Gas Mileage of 1995 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Ford Vehicles 5 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1995 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Ford Aerostar Van 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1995 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Ford Aerostar Wagon 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1995 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Ford Aerostar Wagon View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1995 Ford Aerostar Wagon AWD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Ford Aerostar Wagon AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 1995 Ford Aspire 4 cyl, 1.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1995 Ford Aspire

260

Gas Mileage of 2000 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Toyota Vehicles 0 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2000 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2000 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 2000 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 2000 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2000 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 2000 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Gas Mileage of 1986 Vehicles by Pontiac  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Pontiac Vehicles 6 Pontiac Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1986 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Pontiac 1000 22 City 24 Combined 28 Highway 1986 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Pontiac 1000 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 24 City 27 Combined 31 Highway 1986 Pontiac 1000 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Pontiac 1000 23 City 26 Combined 31 Highway 1986 Pontiac 6000 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Pontiac 6000 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 1986 Pontiac 6000 6 cyl, 2.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Pontiac 6000 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1986 Pontiac 6000 6 cyl, 2.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

262

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Buick  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Buick Vehicles 5 Buick Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Buick Century 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Buick Century 21 City 24 Combined 29 Highway 1985 Buick Century 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Buick Century 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Buick Century 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Buick Century 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Buick Century 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Buick Century 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Buick Century 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Diesel Compare 1985 Buick Century 23 City 26 Combined 32 Highway 1985 Buick Century 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Buick Century 16 City 19 Combined 24

263

Gas Mileage of 2009 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 Chevrolet Vehicles 9 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 6.0 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD Gas 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway E85 10 City 12 Combined 15 Highway 2009 Chevrolet Aveo 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 Chevrolet Aveo View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 25 City 28 Combined 34 Highway 2009 Chevrolet Aveo 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

264

Gas Mileage of 1989 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 GMC Vehicles 9 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 15 Combined 16 Highway 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 12 City 12 Combined 12 Highway 1989 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

265

Gas Mileage of 1991 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Chevrolet Vehicles 1 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1991 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1991 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1991 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1991 Chevrolet Astro AWD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Chevrolet Astro AWD (passenger) 14 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 1991 Chevrolet Beretta 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

266

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Chevrolet Vehicles 4 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Manual 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Chevrolet C10 Pickup 2WD 13 City 14 Combined 16

267

Gas Mileage of 1987 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Toyota Vehicles 7 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1987 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 20 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1987 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1987 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 17 Highway 1987 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1987 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway

268

Gas Mileage of 1986 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Toyota Vehicles 6 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1986 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 20 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1986 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1986 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 17 Highway 1986 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1986 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway

269

Gas Mileage of 1988 Vehicles by Audi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Audi Vehicles 8 Audi Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1988 Audi 5000 CS Turbo 5 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Audi 5000 CS Turbo 16 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1988 Audi 5000 CS Turbo 5 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Audi 5000 CS Turbo 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1988 Audi 5000 CS quattro 5 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Audi 5000 CS quattro 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1988 Audi 5000 CS quattro Wagon 5 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Audi 5000 CS quattro Wagon 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 1988 Audi 5000 S 5 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Audi 5000 S 17 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 1988 Audi 5000 S 5 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

270

Gas Mileage of 1992 Vehicles by Isuzu  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Isuzu Vehicles 2 Isuzu Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1992 Isuzu Amigo 2WD 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Isuzu Amigo 2WD 17 City 18 Combined 19 Highway 1992 Isuzu Amigo 2WD 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Isuzu Amigo 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 1992 Isuzu Amigo 2WD 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Isuzu Amigo 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 1992 Isuzu Amigo 4WD 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 Isuzu Amigo 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1992 Isuzu Impulse 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1992 Isuzu Impulse 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 1992 Isuzu Impulse 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

271

Gas Mileage of 2002 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Dodge Vehicles 2 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic (S4), Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD

272

Gas Mileage of 1996 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Toyota Vehicles 6 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1996 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1996 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 18 City 20 Combined 22 Highway 1996 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1996 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1996 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1996 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1996 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1996 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1996 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1996 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1996 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

273

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Ford Vehicles 2 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Ford E150 Van FFV Gas 13 City 15 Combined 17 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2012 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Ford E150 Van FFV Gas 12 City 14 Combined 16 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2012 Ford E150 Wagon FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Ford E150 Wagon FFV Gas 13 City 14 Combined 16 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2012 Ford E150 Wagon FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Ford E150 Wagon FFV Gas 12 City 13 Combined 16 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2012 Ford E250 Van FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85

274

Gas Mileage of 1991 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Ford Vehicles 1 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1991 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Ford Aerostar Van View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 1991 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Ford Aerostar Van 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1991 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Ford Aerostar Van 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1991 Ford Aerostar Van AWD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Ford Aerostar Van AWD 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1991 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Ford Aerostar Wagon 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1991 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

275

Gas Mileage of 1986 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 GMC Vehicles 6 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 16 City 17 Combined 18 Highway 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 17 Highway 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 17 Highway 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 16 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1986 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

276

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

84 Dodge Vehicles 84 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Dodge 600 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1984 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Dodge 600 21 City 24 Combined 29 Highway 1984 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Dodge 600 20 City 22 Combined 25 Highway 1984 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Dodge 600 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1984 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Dodge 600 19 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 1984 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Dodge 600 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 1984 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.6 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

277

Gas Mileage of 1994 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Chevrolet Vehicles 4 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1994 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline

278

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Ford Vehicles 8 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 Ford Crown Victoria FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2008 Ford Crown Victoria FFV View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2008 Ford Edge AWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Ford Edge AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2008 Ford Edge FWD 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Ford Edge FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2008 Ford Escape 4WD 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Ford Escape 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 21 Combined 24

279

Gas Mileage of 2011 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Dodge Vehicles 1 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2011 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2011 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Dodge Avenger 20 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2011 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2011 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 19 City 22 Combined 29 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 21 Highway 2011 Dodge Caliber 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Compare 2011 Dodge Caliber 23 City 24 Combined 27 Highway 2011 Dodge Caliber 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline

280

Gas Mileage of 1986 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Chevrolet Vehicles 6 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 20 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 16

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Chevrolet Vehicles 8 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 6.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway E85 11 City 12 Combined 15 Highway 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD 8 cyl, 6.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85

282

Gas Mileage of 2013 Vehicles by Cadillac  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Cadillac Vehicles 3 Cadillac Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2013 Cadillac ATS 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Cadillac ATS View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 22 City 26 Combined 33 Highway 2013 Cadillac ATS 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2013 Cadillac ATS Gas 19 City 22 Combined 28 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 21 Highway 2013 Cadillac ATS 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Cadillac ATS 19 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2013 Cadillac ATS 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Cadillac ATS 21 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2013 Cadillac ATS 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Cadillac ATS 19 City 23 Combined 30 Highway 2013 Cadillac ATS AWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline

283

Gas Mileage of 2003 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Chevrolet Vehicles 3 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2003 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 2003 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) Conversion 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) Conversion 13 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 2003 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 2003 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2003 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 14 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 2003 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) Conversion 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

284

Gas Mileage of 2014 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Chevrolet Vehicles 4 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 15 City 18 Combined 24 Highway 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 19 City 22 Combined 30 Highway 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 17 City 20 Combined 28 Highway 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 14

285

Gas Mileage of 1987 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Chevrolet Vehicles 7 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 19 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15

286

Gas Mileage of 1988 Vehicles by Mitsubishi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Mitsubishi Vehicles 8 Mitsubishi Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1988 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Mitsubishi Cordia 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 1988 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Mitsubishi Cordia 21 City 22 Combined 23 Highway 1988 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Mitsubishi Cordia 21 City 24 Combined 29 Highway 1988 Mitsubishi Galant Sigma 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Mitsubishi Galant Sigma 16 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1988 Mitsubishi Galant Sigma 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Mitsubishi Galant Sigma 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1988 Mitsubishi Mirage 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

287

Gas Mileage of 2001 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Mercury Vehicles 1 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2001 Mercury Cougar 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2001 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2001 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2001 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2001 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2001 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

288

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Mercury Vehicles 8 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis FFV Gas 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2008 Mercury Mariner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Mercury Mariner 4WD 19 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 2008 Mercury Mariner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Mercury Mariner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2008 Mercury Mariner FWD 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Mercury Mariner FWD 20 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2008 Mercury Mariner FWD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2008 Mercury Mariner FWD

289

Gas Mileage of 2006 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Chevrolet Vehicles 6 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD Gas 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway E85 10 City 11 Combined 13 Highway 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway E85 10 City 11 Combined 13 Highway 2006 Chevrolet Aveo 5 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Chevrolet Aveo 5 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2006 Chevrolet Aveo 5 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 Chevrolet Aveo 5 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

290

Gas Mileage of 1997 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Dodge Vehicles 7 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1997 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Dodge Avenger 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 1997 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Dodge Avenger 19 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 1997 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 1997 Dodge B1500/B2500 Van 2WD 6 cyl, 3.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Dodge B1500/B2500 Van 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 16 Highway 1997 Dodge B1500/B2500 Van 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Dodge B1500/B2500 Van 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

291

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 GMC Vehicles 4 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Manual 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.1 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 13 City 14 Combined 16 Highway 1984 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

292

Gas Mileage of 1997 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Ford Vehicles 7 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1997 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Ford Aerostar Van 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1997 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Ford Aerostar Wagon 15 City 17 Combined 22 Highway 1997 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Ford Aerostar Wagon View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1997 Ford Aerostar Wagon AWD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Ford Aerostar Wagon AWD 13 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1997 Ford Aspire 4 cyl, 1.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1997 Ford Aspire View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

293

Gas Mileage of 2013 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Chevrolet Vehicles 3 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD Gas 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2013 Chevrolet Camaro 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Chevrolet Camaro View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 2013 Chevrolet Camaro 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Chevrolet Camaro 12 City 14 Combined 18

294

Gas Mileage of 1998 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Mercury Vehicles 8 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1998 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1998 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 1998 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 1998 Mercury Mountaineer 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Mercury Mountaineer 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 1998 Mercury Mountaineer 4WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

295

Gas Mileage of 1986 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Dodge Vehicles 6 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1986 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Dodge 600 21 City 22 Combined 24 Highway 1986 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1986 Dodge 600 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1986 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Dodge 600 20 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1986 Dodge 600 Convertible 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1986 Dodge 600 Convertible 21 City 22 Combined 24 Highway 1986 Dodge 600 Convertible 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1986 Dodge 600 Convertible 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1986 Dodge 600 Convertible 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1986 Dodge 600 Convertible 18

296

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Buick  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Buick Vehicles 4 Buick Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Buick Century 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Buick Century 20 City 23 Combined 28 Highway 1984 Buick Century 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Buick Century 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 1984 Buick Century 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Buick Century 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 1984 Buick Century 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Buick Century 21 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 1984 Buick Century 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Buick Century 20 City 23 Combined 28 Highway 1984 Buick Century 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Buick Century 16 City 18 Combined 22

297

Gas Mileage of 1995 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Chevrolet Vehicles 5 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1995 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1995 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1995 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1995 Chevrolet Astro AWD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1995 Chevrolet Astro AWD (passenger) 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1995 Chevrolet Beretta 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

298

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Cadillac  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Cadillac Vehicles 2 Cadillac Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Cadillac CTS 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Cadillac CTS 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2012 Cadillac CTS 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Cadillac CTS 12 City 14 Combined 18 Highway 2012 Cadillac CTS 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Cadillac CTS 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 2012 Cadillac CTS 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Cadillac CTS 16 City 19 Combined 26 Highway 2012 Cadillac CTS 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Cadillac CTS 18 City 22 Combined 27 Highway 2012 Cadillac CTS AWD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Cadillac CTS AWD 18 City 21 Combined 26

299

Gas Mileage of 2005 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Mercury Vehicles 5 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2005 Mercury Mariner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Mercury Mariner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 2005 Mercury Mariner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Mercury Mariner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2005 Mercury Mariner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Mercury Mariner 4WD 17 City 19 Combined 21 Highway 2005 Mercury Mariner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

300

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 BMW Vehicles 2 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 BMW 128ci Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 BMW 128ci Convertible 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2012 BMW 128ci Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 BMW 128ci Convertible 18 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2012 BMW 128i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 BMW 128i 18 City 21 Combined 28 Highway 2012 BMW 128i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 BMW 128i 18 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2012 BMW 135i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 BMW 135i 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2012 BMW 135i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 BMW 135i 20 City 23 Combined 28 Highway

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Gas Mileage of 1989 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 Dodge Vehicles 9 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1989 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Dodge 600 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1989 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1989 Dodge 600 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1989 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Dodge 600 20 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 1989 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 11 City 12 Combined 13 Highway 1989 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 1989 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

302

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Chevrolet Vehicles 2 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD Gas 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD Gas 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2012 Chevrolet Camaro 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Chevrolet Camaro View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 22 Combined 29 Highway 2012 Chevrolet Camaro 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Chevrolet Camaro 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2012 Chevrolet Camaro 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline

303

Gas Mileage of 2011 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Ford Vehicles 1 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2011 Ford Crown Victoria FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2011 Ford Crown Victoria FFV View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway E85 12 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2011 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2011 Ford E150 Van FFV Gas 12 City 14 Combined 16 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2011 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2011 Ford E150 Van FFV View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Gas 13 City 15 Combined 17 Highway E85 10 City 11 Combined 12 Highway 2011 Ford E150 Wagon FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2011 Ford E150 Wagon FFV Gas 12

304

Gas Mileage of 1992 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 GMC Vehicles 2 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 13 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 1992 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

305

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 BMW Vehicles 8 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 BMW 128i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 BMW 128i View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 28 Highway 2008 BMW 128i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 BMW 128i View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2008 BMW 128i Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 BMW 128i Convertible 18 City 21 Combined 28 Highway 2008 BMW 128i Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 BMW 128i Convertible View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2008 BMW 135i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 BMW 135i View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

306

Gas Mileage of 2004 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Toyota Vehicles 4 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2004 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 2004 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2004 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 2004 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 2004 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

307

Gas Mileage of 1985 Vehicles by Mitsubishi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Mitsubishi Vehicles 5 Mitsubishi Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 21 City 23 Combined 27 Highway 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 21 City 23 Combined 27 Highway 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 21 City 22 Combined 24 Highway 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 22 City 25 Combined 29 Highway 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 21 City 22 Combined 23 Highway 1985 Mitsubishi Cordia 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

308

Gas Mileage of 2013 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Ford Vehicles 3 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2013 Ford C-MAX Hybrid FWD 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Ford C-MAX Hybrid FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 45 City 43 Combined 40 Highway 2013 Ford C-Max Energi Plug-in Hybrid 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gas and Electricity Compare 2013 Ford C-Max Energi Plug-in Hybrid View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Reg. Gas MPG 44 City 43 Combined 41 Highway Elec+Gas kWhrs/100 miles - 34 Combined - MPGe - 100 Combined - 2013 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 4.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2013 Ford E150 Van FFV Gas 13 City 15 Combined 17 Highway E85 9 City 10 Combined 12 Highway 2013 Ford E150 Van FFV 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85

309

Gas Mileage of 1987 Vehicles by Subaru  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Subaru Vehicles 7 Subaru Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1987 Subaru Brat 4WD 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Subaru Brat 4WD 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1987 Subaru Brat 4WD 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Subaru Brat 4WD 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1987 Subaru Hatchback 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Subaru Hatchback 26 City 29 Combined 33 Highway 1987 Subaru Hatchback 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Subaru Hatchback 24 City 26 Combined 29 Highway 1987 Subaru Hatchback 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Subaru Hatchback 21 City 22 Combined 23 Highway 1987 Subaru Hatchback 4WD 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Subaru Hatchback 4WD 21

310

Gas Mileage of 1987 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Mercury Vehicles 7 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1987 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Mercury Cougar 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1987 Mercury Cougar 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon 16 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 1987 Mercury Lynx 4 cyl, 1.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Mercury Lynx 23

311

Gas Mileage of 2011 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 BMW Vehicles 1 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2011 BMW 128ci Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 BMW 128ci Convertible 18 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2011 BMW 128ci Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 BMW 128ci Convertible View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2011 BMW 128i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 BMW 128i 18 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2011 BMW 128i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 BMW 128i View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2011 BMW 135i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 BMW 135i 20 City 23 Combined 28 Highway 2011 BMW 135i 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline

312

Gas Mileage of 1993 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Toyota Vehicles 3 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1993 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 16 City 17 Combined 18 Highway 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 12 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

313

Gas Mileage of 2010 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 Dodge Vehicles 10 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2010 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Dodge Avenger View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2010 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Dodge Avenger 16 City 20 Combined 27 Highway 2010 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2010 Dodge Avenger Gas 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2010 Dodge Caliber 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Dodge Caliber View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 23 City 26 Combined 31 Highway 2010 Dodge Caliber 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Dodge Caliber

314

Gas Mileage of 1991 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 GMC Vehicles 1 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 18 Highway 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 1991 GMC C2500 Sierra 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

315

Gas Mileage of 1991 Vehicles by Volvo  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Volvo Vehicles 1 Volvo Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1991 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Volvo 240 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1991 Volvo 240 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Volvo 240 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 1991 Volvo 240 Wagon 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Volvo 240 Wagon 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1991 Volvo 240 Wagon 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Volvo 240 Wagon View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 1991 Volvo 740 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1991 Volvo 740 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

316

Gas Mileage of 1993 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Chevrolet Vehicles 3 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1993 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1993 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 14

317

Gas Mileage of 2010 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 Chevrolet Vehicles 10 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD Gas 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway E85 11 City 13 Combined 16 Highway 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD 8 cyl, 6.2 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD Gas 12 City 14 Combined 19 Highway E85 9 City 11 Combined 14 Highway 2010 Chevrolet Aveo 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Chevrolet Aveo View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 25 City 28 Combined 34 Highway 2010 Chevrolet Aveo 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Chevrolet Aveo 27 City 30 Combined 35 Highway 2010 Chevrolet Aveo 5 4 cyl, 1.6 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

318

Gas Mileage of 1988 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 GMC Vehicles 8 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1988 GMC C15 Pickup 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

319

Gas Mileage of 2002 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Toyota Vehicles 2 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2002 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2002 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2002 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Toyota Avalon View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway 2002 Toyota Camry 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2002 Toyota Camry View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 29 Highway 2002 Toyota Camry 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

320

Gas Mileage of 2009 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

09 GMC Vehicles 09 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2009 GMC Acadia AWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 GMC Acadia AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2009 GMC Acadia FWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 GMC Acadia FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2009 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 GMC Canyon 2WD 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2009 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 GMC Canyon 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2009 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2009 GMC Canyon 2WD 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2009 GMC Canyon 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Gas Mileage of 1990 Vehicles by Mercury  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

90 Mercury Vehicles 90 Mercury Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1990 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1990 Mercury Cougar 15 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 1990 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Mercury Cougar View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 1990 Mercury Cougar 6 cyl, 3.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1990 Mercury Cougar 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1990 Mercury Grand Marquis 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Mercury Grand Marquis View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1990 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1990 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon 15

322

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Saab  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Saab Vehicles 2 Saab Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Saab 9-3 Convertible 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Saab 9-3 Convertible Gas 18 City 22 Combined 28 Highway E85 13 City 16 Combined 21 Highway 2012 Saab 9-3 Convertible 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Saab 9-3 Convertible Gas 20 City 25 Combined 33 Highway E85 15 City 18 Combined 23 Highway 2012 Saab 9-3 Sedan AWD 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Saab 9-3 Sedan AWD 18 City 22 Combined 29 Highway 2012 Saab 9-3 Sedan AWD 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 Saab 9-3 Sedan AWD 20 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2012 Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan Gas 19

323

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 GMC Vehicles 2 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 GMC Acadia AWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 GMC Acadia AWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2012 GMC Acadia FWD 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 GMC Acadia FWD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 24 Highway 2012 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 GMC Canyon 2WD 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2012 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.9 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 GMC Canyon 2WD 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2012 GMC Canyon 2WD 8 cyl, 5.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2012 GMC Canyon 2WD 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2012 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

324

Gas Mileage of 2006 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 GMC Vehicles 6 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD 5 cyl, 3.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 GMC Canyon 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway 2006 GMC Canyon 4WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2006 GMC Canyon 4WD 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 2006 GMC Canyon 4WD 4 cyl, 2.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

325

Gas Mileage of 1988 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Dodge Vehicles 8 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1988 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1988 Dodge 600 18 City 20 Combined 23 Highway 1988 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Dodge 600 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1988 Dodge 600 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Dodge 600 20 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 1988 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 11 City 12 Combined 13 Highway 1988 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 12 City 14 Combined 16 Highway 1988 Dodge AD100/AD150 Ramcharger 2WD 8 cyl, 5.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline

326

Gas Mileage of 1987 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Ford Vehicles 7 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 18 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 23 City 24 Combined 26 Highway 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 16 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Ford Aerostar Van 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1987 Ford Aerostar Wagon 4 cyl, 2.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Ford Aerostar Wagon 19 City 21 Combined 24 Highway 1987 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

327

Gas Mileage of 1998 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Toyota Vehicles 8 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1998 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1998 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 1998 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1998 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1998 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1998 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.7 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

328

Gas Mileage of 2005 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 Toyota Vehicles 5 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2005 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Toyota 4Runner 2WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 16 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 2005 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 15 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2005 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 2005 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 8 cyl, 4.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2005 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 18 Highway 2005 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline

329

Gas Mileage of 2004 Vehicles by Volkswagen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Volkswagen Vehicles 4 Volkswagen Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2004 Volkswagen GTI 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 Volkswagen GTI View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 24 Combined 28 Highway 2004 Volkswagen GTI 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic (S5), Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 Volkswagen GTI View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway 2004 Volkswagen GTI 6 cyl, 2.8 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2004 Volkswagen GTI View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 22 Combined 27 Highway 2004 Volkswagen Golf 4 cyl, 1.9 L, Manual 5-spd, Diesel Compare 2004 Volkswagen Golf View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 32 City 36 Combined 42 Highway 2004 Volkswagen Golf 4 cyl, 1.9 L, Automatic (S5), Diesel Compare 2004 Volkswagen Golf

330

Gas Mileage of 2014 Vehicles by Nissan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Nissan Vehicles 4 Nissan Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2014 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Nissan 370Z 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2014 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Nissan 370Z 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster 17 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2014 Nissan Altima 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Nissan Altima View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 27 City 31 Combined 38 Highway 2014 Nissan Altima 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Auto(AV-S7), Regular Gasoline

331

Gas Mileage of 1994 Vehicles by GMC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 GMC Vehicles 4 GMC Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1994 GMC Jimmy 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1994 GMC Jimmy 2WD 15 City 18 Combined 22 Highway 1994 GMC Jimmy 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 GMC Jimmy 2WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1994 GMC Jimmy 4WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 1994 GMC Jimmy 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1994 GMC Jimmy 4WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 GMC Jimmy 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1994 GMC Rally G15/25 2WD 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1994 GMC Rally G15/25 2WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway 1994 GMC Rally G15/25 2WD 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

332

Gas Mileage of 2014 Vehicles by Dodge  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Dodge Vehicles 4 Dodge Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2014 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Dodge Avenger 21 City 24 Combined 30 Highway 2014 Dodge Avenger 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Dodge Avenger 20 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2014 Dodge Avenger 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gas or E85 Compare 2014 Dodge Avenger Gas 19 City 22 Combined 29 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 21 Highway 2014 Dodge Challenger 6 cyl, 3.6 L, Automatic 5-spd, Midgrade Gasoline Compare 2014 Dodge Challenger 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2014 Dodge Challenger 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Automatic 5-spd, Midgrade Gasoline Compare 2014 Dodge Challenger 15 City 18 Combined 25 Highway 2014 Dodge Challenger 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline

333

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Oldsmobile  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1984 Oldsmobile Vehicles 1984 Oldsmobile Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 1984 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon 8 cyl, 5.7 L, Automatic 4-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 1984 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon 8 cyl, 5.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon 13 City 15 Combined 20 Highway 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera 20 City 23 Combined 28 Highway 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera 17

334

Gas Mileage of 1989 Vehicles by Ford  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

89 Ford Vehicles 89 Ford Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1989 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Ford Aerostar Van 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1989 Ford Aerostar Van 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Ford Aerostar Van 16 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 1989 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Ford Aerostar Wagon 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1989 Ford Aerostar Wagon 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Ford Aerostar Wagon 15 City 17 Combined 21 Highway 1989 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1989 Ford Bronco 4WD 12 City 13 Combined 14 Highway 1989 Ford Bronco 4WD 6 cyl, 4.9 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

335

Gas Mileage of 2010 Vehicles by Nissan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Nissan Vehicles 0 Nissan Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2010 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2010 Nissan 370Z 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2010 Nissan 370Z 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2010 Nissan 370Z 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Automatic (S7), Premium Gasoline Compare 2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster 18 City 21 Combined 25 Highway 2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster 6 cyl, 3.7 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway 2010 Nissan Altima 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Compare 2010 Nissan Altima View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 23 City 27 Combined 32 Highway 2010 Nissan Altima 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Auto(AV-S6), Regular Gasoline

336

Gas Mileage of 1987 Vehicles by Isuzu  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Isuzu Vehicles 7 Isuzu Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 26 City 28 Combined 30 Highway 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 31 City 33 Combined 37 Highway 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 28 City 31 Combined 35 Highway 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Isuzu I-Mark 24 City 27 Combined 33 Highway 1987 Isuzu Impulse 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Isuzu Impulse 18 City 20 Combined 22 Highway 1987 Isuzu Impulse 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1987 Isuzu Impulse 18 City 21 Combined 25

337

Gas Mileage of 2004 Vehicles by Chevrolet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Chevrolet Vehicles 4 Chevrolet Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) Conversion 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (cargo) Conversion 14 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (passenger) View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 14 City 16 Combined 19 Highway 2004 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 2004 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) 14 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 2004 Chevrolet Astro AWD (cargo) Conversion 6 cyl, 4.3 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

338

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Isuzu  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Isuzu Vehicles 4 Isuzu Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 21 City 22 Combined 23 Highway 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 21 City 23 Combined 26 Highway 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 26 City 27 Combined 28 Highway 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 4-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 33 City 35 Combined 38 Highway 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 30 City 32 Combined 35 Highway 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 19 City 20 Combined 22 Highway 1984 Isuzu I-Mark 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

339

Gas Mileage of 2014 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Toyota Vehicles 4 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2014 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2014 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 2014 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 17 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 2014 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Toyota Avalon 21 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2014 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2014 Toyota Avalon 21 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2014 Toyota Avalon Hybrid 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Auto(AV-S6), Regular Gasoline

340

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Toyota Vehicles 4 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 16 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1984 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 16 City 17 Combined 19 Highway 1984 Toyota Cab Chassis 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Toyota Cab Chassis 2WD 15 City 15 Combined 15 Highway 1984 Toyota Cab Chassis 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 Toyota Cab Chassis 2WD 15 City 15 Combined 15 Highway 1984 Toyota Camry 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Manual 5-spd, Diesel Compare 1984 Toyota Camry 29 City 32 Combined 37 Highway 1984 Toyota Camry 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Gas Mileage of 1988 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Toyota Vehicles 8 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1988 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 19 City 20 Combined 22 Highway 1988 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Toyota 1-Ton Truck 2WD 17 City 18 Combined 20 Highway 1988 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 15 City 16 Combined 17 Highway 1988 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 19 Combined 20 Highway 1988 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1988 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 14 City 15 Combined 17 Highway

342

Gas Mileage of 2007 Vehicles by BMW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 BMW Vehicles 7 BMW Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2007 BMW 328ci 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 BMW 328ci View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 28 Highway 2007 BMW 328ci 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 BMW 328ci View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 22 Combined 28 Highway 2007 BMW 328ci Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 BMW 328ci Convertible 17 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2007 BMW 328ci Convertible 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 BMW 328ci Convertible View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 18 City 21 Combined 27 Highway 2007 BMW 328cxi 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 BMW 328cxi 17 City

343

Gas Mileage of 2013 Vehicles by Toyota  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Toyota Vehicles 3 Toyota Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2013 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Toyota 4Runner 2WD 17 City 19 Combined 22 Highway 2013 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 2013 Toyota 4Runner 4WD 6 cyl, 4.0 L, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Toyota 4Runner 4WD View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 18 Combined 21 Highway 2013 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Toyota Avalon 21 City 24 Combined 31 Highway 2013 Toyota Avalon 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic (S6), Regular Gasoline Compare 2013 Toyota Avalon 21 City 25 Combined 31

344

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-005656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Schwan?s Home Service CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Flint, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 28, 2011 CX-005655: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Schwan?s Home Service CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Wakarusa, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 28, 2011 CX-005653: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pilot-Scale Testing Evaluating the Effects of Bromine Additions on Continuous Mercury Monitors at Low Mercury Concentrations CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 04/28/2011

345

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-001991: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northern New Mexico College - El Rito Campus CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/22/2010 Location(s): New Mexico Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 22, 2010 CX-001990: Categorical Exclusion Determination Highlands University CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/22/2010 Location(s): Las Vegas, New Mexico Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 22, 2010 CX-000926: Categorical Exclusion Determination "Feedstock to Tailpipe Initiative": Kansas Biofuels Production, Testing and Certification Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/22/2010 Location(s): Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 22, 2010

346

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 30, 2013 May 30, 2013 CX-010215: Categorical Exclusion Determination Laufer Wind Group National Wind Technology Center Structure Lighting Tests CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.15 Date: 05/30/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office May 30, 2013 CX-010483: Categorical Exclusion Determination Man Hole Cover Assembly Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/30/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 29, 2013 CX-010508: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cloud County Community College Wind Turbine CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.14 Date: 05/29/2013 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): Golden Field Office May 29, 2013 CX-010480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of a Multi-User Network Testbed for Wide-Area Monitoring and

347

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2012 3, 2012 CX-008950: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pilot Testing: Pretreatment Options to Allow Re-Use of Frac Flowback Water CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/13/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 13, 2012 CX-008949: Categorical Exclusion Determination Novel Materials for Robust Repair of Leaky Wellbores in Carbon Dioxide Storage Formations CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08/13/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 13, 2012 CX-008884: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rattlesnake Butte Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 08/13/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 13, 2012 CX-008879: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pearl-Marion No.1 Line Tower 21/1 Bank Repair Project

348

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2009 6, 2009 CX-000541: Categorical Exclusion Determination Checkout of StreamPro ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) Velocity Meter CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 16, 2009 CX-000540: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Americium/Curium separations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 16, 2009 CX-006654: Categorical Exclusion Determination B-1-28 Test Site Reclamation CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.28, B6.1 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC November 16, 2009 CX-006660: Categorical Exclusion Determination

349

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 5, 2010 January 5, 2010 CX-000802: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transmission Electron Microscopy Specimen Preparation by Electropolishing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office January 5, 2010 CX-000803: Categorical Exclusion Determination Production of Hazardous Enhanced Chemical Cleaning Sludge Simulants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office January 5, 2010 CX-000804: Categorical Exclusion Determination 9975, 9977 and 9978 Annual Maintenance and Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

350

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2013 14, 2013 CX-010493: Categorical Exclusion Determination Determining Distribution Coefficients by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 14, 2013 CX-010492: Categorical Exclusion Determination Permeation Testing Metals, Ceramics, and Polymers CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 14, 2013 CX-010282: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 14, 2013 CX-010281: Categorical Exclusion Determination

351

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12, 2011 12, 2011 CX-006468: Categorical Exclusion Determination Testing Subcontractor for Fenestration System Energy Performance Rating Development and Research CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006466: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deep/Shallow Well Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Albany, Oregon Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 11, 2011 CX-006490: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bat Roost Tower Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 08/11/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office August 11, 2011 CX-006478: Categorical Exclusion Determination

352

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2010 3, 2010 CX-004740: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Amonix Panels at National Solar Thermal Test Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/23/2010 Location(s): New Mexico Office(s): Sandia Site Office November 23, 2010 CX-004719: Categorical Exclusion Determination Upgrade Communication/Control Systems to BC Brine Disposal Well (Government Furnished Equipment and Install) CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 11/23/2010 Location(s): Louisiana Office(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office November 23, 2010 CX-004592: Categorical Exclusion Determination Re-Utilization of Industrial Carbon Dioxide for Algae Production Using a Phase Change Material CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 11/23/2010 Location(s): Wooster, Ohio Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

353

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-005332: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 02/28/2011 Location(s): Wichita, Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 28, 2011 CX-005329: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fluid-Bed Testing of GreatPoint Energy's Direct Oxygen Injection Catalytic Gasification Process CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/28/2011 Location(s): Grand Forks, North Dakota Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 28, 2011 CX-005301: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alaska-Tribal Energy Program-The Tatitlek Corporation CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 02/28/2011 Location(s): Tatitlek, Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

354

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

355

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2011 3, 2011 CX-006354: Categorical Exclusion Determination Extraction and Recovery of Lignin and Hemicellulose from Biomass CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/23/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 23, 2011 CX-006353: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grout Formulation and Variability Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/23/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 23, 2011 CX-006349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohio-City-Cuyahoga Falls CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/23/2011 Location(s): Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 23, 2011 CX-006347: Categorical Exclusion Determination

356

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2012 November 29, 2012 CX-009633: Categorical Exclusion Determination Upgrade to the Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) Wall at Test Reactor Area (TRA)-670 CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 11/29/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office November 29, 2012 CX-009608: Categorical Exclusion Determination Refurbish 607-53C Sanitary Sewer Lift Station CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 28, 2012 CX-009552: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.20 Date: 11/28/2012 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): Golden Field Office November 28, 2012 CX-009547: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Advanced Seismic Data Analysis Program ('Hot Pot Project')

357

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

15, 2011 15, 2011 CX-006137: Categorical Exclusion Determination B39 Cellular Repeater Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 06/15/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 15, 2011 CX-006136: Categorical Exclusion Determination Field Testing of Low Impact Oil Field Roads CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 06/15/2011 Location(s): Webb County, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 15, 2011 CX-006079: Categorical Exclusion Determination Topic 7A, Emergency Backup Power Systems CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 06/15/2011 Location(s): Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office June 14, 2011 CX-006242: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Gunnison-Salida 115-Kilovolt Transmission Line Jumper Cable

358

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-004275: Categorical Exclusion Determination Soil Amendment Product for Oilfield Brine Contaminated Soil ? Field Testing Part II CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 10/19/2010 Location(s): Yale, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 18, 2010 CX-004292: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small Scale Electrical Power Generation from Low-Temperature Geothermal Process Water Utilized in a Mining Operation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 10/18/2010 Location(s): Reno, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office October 18, 2010 CX-004290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Greenfield Community College - Geothermal Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/18/2010 Location(s): Massachusetts Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

359

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2012 7, 2012 CX-009375: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Lyapunov Function Based Remedial Action Screening Tool Using Real-Time Data CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/17/2012 Location(s): Multiple Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 17, 2012 CX-009374: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of a Carbon Dioxide Chemical Sensor for Downhole Carbon Dioxide Monitoring in Carbon Sequestration CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/17/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 17, 2012 CX-009373: Categorical Exclusion Determination Testing of an Advanced Dry Cooling Technology for Power Plants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/17/2012 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 17, 2012

360

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 22, 2012 February 22, 2012 CX-007929: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project: Black Hills Energy Compressed Natural Gas Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 02/22/2012 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory February 22, 2012 CX-007928: Categorical Exclusion Determination Game Changing Technology of Polymeric-Surfactants for Tertiary Oil CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 02/22/2012 Location(s): Indiana Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory February 22, 2012 CX-007927: Categorical Exclusion Determination Compressor Testing of Next Generation Refrigeration Lubricants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/22/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory February 22, 2012 CX-007926: Categorical Exclusion Determination

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2012 1, 2012 CX-008288: Categorical Exclusion Determination Decommissioning of the Appliance Testing and Evaluation Center in Morgantown CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 1, 2012 CX-008287: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 1, 2012 CX-008286: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 1, 2012 CX-008285: Categorical Exclusion Determination E85 (Ethanol) Retail Fueling Infrastructure Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.22

362

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2012 7, 2012 CX-009619: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dissolution of Sludge Constituents in Glycolate-Containing 2H Evaporator Rad Feed Solution CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2012 CX-009618: Categorical Exclusion Determination Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Radar Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2012 CX-009617: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gas Mass Spectrometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2012 CX-009432: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transformational Approach to Reducing the Total System Costs of Building

363

Estimated Cost Description Determination Date:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Title, Location Title, Location Estimated Cost Description Determination Date: 2010 LCLS Undulator 2 is envisioned to be a 0.2 - 2keV FEL x-ray source, capable of delivering x-rays to End Station A (ESA), located in the existing Research Yard at SLAC. It will also be configurable as a non- FEL hard x-ray source capable of delivering a chirped x-ray pulse for single-shot broad-spectrum measurements. The project would entail reconstruction of the electron beam transport to End Station A, construction and installation of a new undulator in the tunnel upstream of ESA and beam dump, and construction and installation of x-ray transport, optics, and diagnostics in ESA. It also includes the construction of an annex to End Station A , providing hutches for experiment stations.

364

test1 - Datasets - OpenEI Datasets  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

test1 This is only a test Data and Resources TEST1.1com TESTING More info Go to resource doe test1 test2 test Additional Info Field Value Catalog OpenEI Origination Date 2014-11-12...

365

Rough Ride Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NTP005 NTP005 Revision 2 Effective December 1, 2004 Electric Vehicle Rough Road Course Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Ryan Harkins Approved by: _________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner ©2004 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved Procedure ETA-NTP005 Revision 2 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation 3 4.0 Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 4 5.0 Testing Activity Requirements 6 6.0 Glossary 12 7.0 References 14 Appendices Appendix A - Electric Vehicle Rough Road Test Data Sheet 15

366

Test Cell Location  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mazda 3 i-Stop Mazda 3 i-Stop Test Cell Location APRF- 4WD Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Conventional- Start Stop Vehicle Dynamometer Input Document Date 11/20/2012 Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Test weight [lb] 3250 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Document Date 11/20/2012 Revision Number 1 Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3250 31.2 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.462 0.014 Test Fuel Information - Vehicle equipped with with i-Stop package - Manual Transmission - All tests completed in ECO mode - EPA shift schedule modified based on vehicle shift light activity Revision Number 1 Notes: Fuel type EPA Tier II EEE Gasoline Test Fuel Information - Vehicle equipped with with i-Stop package

367

Hydrogen Station Test Device Design and Fabrication | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hydrogen Station Test Device Design and Fabrication Hydrogen Station Test Device Design and Fabrication October 2, 2014 - 3:02pm Addthis Open Date: August 26, 2014 Requesting...

368

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 1, 2010 October 1, 2010 CX-004064: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Pilot Testing of a Membrane System for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 10/01/2010 Location(s): Holbrook, Arizona Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 1, 2010 CX-004063: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Pilot Testing of a Membrane System for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 10/01/2010 Location(s): Wilsonville, Alabama Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 1, 2010 CX-004062: Categorical Exclusion Determination Strategy to Accelerate United States Transition to Electric Vehicles

369

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Battery Capacity and Depth of Discharge Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Garrett P. Beauregard Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-GTP003 Revision 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Objective ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Documentation............................................................................................................

370

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Traction System Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Garrett P. Beauregard Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-GTP002 Revision 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Objective ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Documentation............................................................................................................

371

EV America Skid Test Procedure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Electromagnetic Interference and Susceptibility Test Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date:__________ Garrett P. Beauregard Approved by: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________ Donald B. Karner Procedure ETA-GTP004 Revision 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Objective ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Documentation............................................................................................................

372

Absolute Time Radiometric Dating: the source  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Absolute Time Radiometric Dating: the source of the dates on the Geologic Time Scale #12 as an element changes to another element, e.g. uranium to lead. · The parent element is radioactive · Carbon-14, C14 Nitrogen-14, N14 · Uranium-235, U235 Lead-207, Pb207 · Potassium-40, K40 Argon-40, Ar40

Kammer, Thomas

373

Vehicle arrived for disposal Date Disposal of Asset form approved (copy required) Date  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Colour Engine (ltrs) Fuel (ulp/diesel) Transmission (auto/manual) Compliance date Kilometres Additions-BusinessSolutions@anu.edu.au Post auction report from Pickles received. Date (ie Sold at General Auction, passed-in etc) Cheque

Botea, Adi

374

Property:Event/Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Property Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Property:Event/Date Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Event/Date Property Type Date Description The date on which an event occurs. Pages using the property "Event/Date" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 1 11th Annual Workshop on Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading + 3 October 2011 + 11th Annual Workshop on Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Day 2 + 4 October 2011 + 15th International Business Forum: Low Carbon High Growth - Business Models for a Changing Climate + 21 October 2012 + 18th Africa Partnership Forum + 25 April 2012 + 2 2012 Bonn Climate Change Conference + 14 May 2012 + 7 7th Asia Clean Energy Forum + 4 June 2012 + A ASEAN Roadmapping Workshop + 2 June 2011 +

375

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-004278: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of the Triassic Newark Basin of New York and New Jersey for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 10/19/2010 Location(s): Clarkstown, New York Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 19, 2010 CX-004275: Categorical Exclusion Determination Soil Amendment Product for Oilfield Brine Contaminated Soil ? Field Testing Part II CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 10/19/2010 Location(s): Yale, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 18, 2010 CX-004292: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small Scale Electrical Power Generation from Low-Temperature Geothermal Process Water Utilized in a Mining Operation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.6

376

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2010 2, 2010 CX-001102: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Clemson University Wind Turbine Testing Facility CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03/02/2010 Location(s): North Charleston, South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 2, 2010 CX-001037: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low-Cost Illumination Grade Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.1 Date: 03/02/2010 Location(s): San Jose, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 2, 2010 CX-001036: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solution Processable Transparent Conductive Hole Injection Electrode for Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) Solid State Lighting (Pennsylvania) CX(s) Applied: B3.6

377

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: Liner Drilling Date:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Liner Drilling Date: Liner Drilling Date: 4-5-10 DOE Code: 71092 Cont ractor Code: 8067-766 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview Nothing out of the ordinary for drilling an existing location 1. What are the environmental impacts? NE SW Sec 21 , T39N, R78W (45-3-X-21 well) 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately a week 4 . What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Drilling Rig etc.)? Will Drill out of 9 5/8 caslng with liner drillng assembly. After drilling approximately 750 to 1000 ft, will test liner hanging assembly set and retrieve multiple times. The table b elow is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialis t and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey a

378

Fleet test evaluations of an automotive and medium-duty truck coolant filter conditioner  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The use of coolant filtration and supplemental coolant additives (SCA) to replenish depleted protective chemistry has been applied in the heavy duty diesel arena for many years. Some filtration of coolant and SCA usage in light gasoline engine and automotive diesel engine vehicles has taken place using off-board equipment to filter and recondition coolant. As concerns about the environment have increased, disposal of spent coolant that is replaced on a scheduled basis is a burden on fleets as well as individuals. In addition, as the efforts by vehicle manufacturers to extend or eliminate routine service intervals of vehicle systems increase, the use of an on-board system has become more attractive. A number of filtration/conditioning designs have been developed for light and medium duty use and have been on field tests for over a year. These field tests are described and reported, along with background on the filter design and chemistry package used. Field testing included: low and high mileage vehicles; newer and older vehicles; well and poorly maintained vehicles; and an assessment of the possibility of overcharging of the coolant chemistry.

Wright, A.B. [AlliedSignal Filters and Spark Plugs, Perrysburg, OH (United States)

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

Testing for Bacteria  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Testing for Bacteria Testing for Bacteria Name: Danielle Location: N/A Country: N/A Date: N/A Question: I have to do a science fair project. What I need to compare the relative bacterial levels in milk samples with different expiration dates. What can I use to test the bacteria? Please help! Replies: You want to see if there are bacteria present in milk of different expiration dates, and if so, what they do to the milk. So buy milk of different dates. You could test what effect storage temperature has on bacterial growth in milk. Use those different milk samples in their original package (don't open it!) and keep them at 37 degrees C, at room temperature, and in the fridge (measure how cold that is) for say 48 hrs.Then open the bottle or pack and see what happened to the milk. Do you see differences? Can you explain them? If you open the milk before the experiment you may get bacteria into the milk that otherwise would not have been there. The experiment with the closed bottles will tell you what is better, storage of milk at room temperature, warm, or cold.

380

Property:Date Submitted | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Date Submitted Date Submitted Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Date Submitted Property Type String Pages using the property "Date Submitted" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) M MHK Technologies/14 MW OTECPOWER + 45:22.0 + MHK Technologies/Aegir Dynamo + 47:39.7 + MHK Technologies/AirWEC + 3/2/2013 + MHK Technologies/Anaconda bulge tube drives turbine + 35:14.3 + MHK Technologies/AquaBuoy + 9/2/2010 + MHK Technologies/Aquanator + 9/28/2010 + MHK Technologies/Aquantis + 47:31.6 + MHK Technologies/Archimedes Wave Swing + 9/28/2010 + MHK Technologies/Atlantis AN 150 + 6/18/2012 + MHK Technologies/Atlantis AR 1000 + 6/18/2012 + MHK Technologies/Atlantis AS 400 + 6/18/2012 + MHK Technologies/Atlantisstrom + 51:25.6 + MHK Technologies/BOLT Lifesaver + 04:16.3 +

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Winter Study Rebate Form 2012 Date______________________________ ID #________________________________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Winter Study Rebate Form 2012 Date______________________________ ID to receive your rebate? Credit term account______ EPH Dollars_______ WINTER STUDY REBATES ARE GIVEN 10 consecutive calendar days are entitled to a rebate Rebates will be calculated on a per day basis

Aalberts, Daniel P.

382

Winter Study Rebate Form 2013 Date______________________________ ID #________________________________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Winter Study Rebate Form 2013 Date______________________________ ID to receive your rebate? Credit term account______ EPH Dollars_______ WINTER STUDY REBATES ARE GIVEN 10 consecutive calendar days are entitled to a rebate Rebates will be calculated on a per day basis

Aalberts, Daniel P.

383

: H. Jack Elackwell, Area Manager, LAAO DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

O.&E b.&AORANDti l > : H. Jack Elackwell, Area Manager, LAAO DATE: June 5, 1973 70 : ?ZH-Division Leader ,WE,T : ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY SURVEY OF LOS ALAMOS COMIMUNITY...

384

SAVE THE DATE!!! The Silicon Valley  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SAVE THE DATE!!! The Silicon Valley 3rd Annual Social Innovation Leadership Forum 2014 (SILF 2014 towards a better tomorrow... Register for the event today! The Social Innovation Leadership Forum (SILF

Su, Xiao

385

Property:GEAReportDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pages using the property "GEAReportDate" Showing 1 page using this property. L Los Humeros III Geothermal Power Plant + 19 December 2013 + Retrieved from "http:en.openei.org...

386

Version Date: July 2012 COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARKS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

WEB Clock Version Date: July 2012 #12;COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARKS Copyright © 1998, 2011, Oracle and Guide WEB Clock Page iii Table of Contents WEB Clock ........................................................................................................................ 1 WEB Clock Procedure

387

Enter Date: Enter NVLAP Lab Code: NIST HANDBOOK 150-10 CHECKLIST  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Enter Date: Enter NVLAP Lab Code: NIST HANDBOOK 150-10 CHECKLIST EFFICIENCY OF ELECTRIC MOTORS prescribed in NIST Handbook 150-10, Efficiency of Electric Motors. The Test Method Review Summary, which is used to review the laboratory's ability to perform Efficiency of Electric Motors test methods

388

NO. REV. NO. Systems Division DATE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-~ NO. REV. NO. EATM-15 PAGE OF ~ Systems Division DATE EASEP /PSEP Solar Panel Development Design+"'--.:L'_;;;J....;::::::..··-=·~::!!:!!!e::...._ K. Hsi #12;NO. REV. NO. EATM-15 EASEP/PSEP Solar Panel Development ~ Systems Division Design of the EASE-PSEP Solar Panel Array~PA::G:,:E:..::=l=~o:F~=2=7= DATE 20 Nov. 1968 1. 0 SUMMARY Electrical power

Rathbun, Julie A.

389

Willard Libby, Radiocarbon, and Carbon Dating  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Willard Libby, Radiocarbon, and Carbon Dating Willard Libby, Radiocarbon, and Carbon Dating Resources with Additional Information · Radiocarbon Dating Willard Libby Courtesy UCLA Photography 'Scientific discoveries of various magnitudes are constantly occurring in myriad fields of study. It is a rarity, however, to make a breakthrough that not only has an impact on an individual field but also revolutionizes scientific thought across multiple disciplines. Willard Frank Libby accomplished this feat. Libby first proposed his idea of carbon dating in 1947 and over the next 12 years he researched and perfected the process. Libby discovered that when plants absorb carbon for photosynthesis they also absorb certain amounts of carbon-14. He deduced that when the plant dies, it no longer absorbs any of this carbon and that carbon-14 decays at a predictable rate. Libby found a way to determine the age of plant-based artifacts utilizing the decay rate of carbon-14. This process has been used to determine the age of mummies, prehistoric artifacts and dwellings. This dating technique has proven extremely valuable to earth scientists, archeologists, and anthropologists. '1

390

2014 NEJC Save the Date (Spanish) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2014 NEJC Save the Date (Spanish) 2014 NEJC Save the Date (Spanish) 2014 National Environmental Justice Conference and Training Program Save the Date, March 26 to 28, 2014 Save the...

391

2014 NEJC Save the Date (English) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 NEJC Save the Date (English) 2014 NEJC Save the Date (English) 2014 National Environmental Justice Conference and Training Program Save the Date, March 26 to 28, 2014 Save the...

392

Presentations by Date | Merit Review Application  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Presentations by Date Presentations by Date Friday May 17 2013 Title Presenting Organization Document Presentation date A MultiAir / MultiFuel Approach to Enhancing Engine System Efficiency Chrysler ace062_reese_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Lean Gasoline System Development for Fuel Efficient Small Car General Motors ace063_smith_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Gasoline Ultra Fuel Efficient Vehicle Delphi ace064_confer_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Advanced Gasoline Turbocharged Direct Injection (GTDI) Engine Development Ford Motor Company ace065_weaver_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Advanced Combustion Concepts - Enabling Systems and Solutions (ACCESS) for High Efficiency Light Duty Vehicles Robert Bosch ace066_yilmaz_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 ATP-LD; Cummins Next Generation Tier 2 Bin 2 Diesel Engine Cummins ace061_ruth_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013

393

COS NUV TA1 Mirror Specification Date: December 8, 1999  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Manager, CU/CASA Date Approved By: J. C. Green, COS Principal Investigator, CU/CASA Date Center/Handling:........................................................................................ 3 3.4.3 Solvents

Colorado at Boulder, University of

394

COS NUV Grating Substrate Specification Date: August 20, 2001  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Experiment Manager, CU/CASA Date Approved By: J. C. Green, COS Principal Investigator, CU/CASA Date Center/Handling: ............................................................................................3 3.4.3 Solvents.........................................................................................................

Colorado at Boulder, University of

395

COS Coating Reflectivity Specification Date: August 2, 1999  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Project Scientist, CU/CASA Date Approved By: J. C. Green, COS Principal Investigator, CU/CASA Date Center .................................................................................. 4 4.1.1 Solvents

Colorado at Boulder, University of

396

NO. REV. NO. LSPE THERMAL BATTERY TEST  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NO. REV. NO. ATM 1086 LSPE THERMAL BATTERY TEST PAGE 1 OF DATE 2/25/72 Prepared by @c!_.e,~.~ ~P. Weir Approved by ~~---:J L. Lewis 5 #12;KC::Y, NO. LSPE THERMAL BATTERY TEST ATM 1086 2 PAGE OF DATE 2-52-72 Introduction The purpose of this ATM is to document the results of a Thermal Battery test for the Lunar Seismic

Rathbun, Julie A.

397

Re-release Date: August 13, 2013  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Re-release Date: August 13, 2013" Re-release Date: August 13, 2013" "Table 27. Estimated rail transportation rates for coal, state to state, EIA data" ,,"Nominal Dollars per Ton",,,,"Annual Percent Change" "Origin State","Destination State",2008,2009,2010,," 2008-2010"," 2009-2010" "Alabama","Alabama"," $14.43"," $13.59"," $15.46",, 3.5, 13.8 "Alabama","Georgia"," $19.13"," $19.58"," $22.30",, 8.0, 13.9 "Alabama","Kentucky"," -"," W"," -",," -"," -" "Alabama","New Jersey"," W"," -"," -",," -"," -"

398

Computational Age Dating of Special Nuclear Materials  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This slide-show presented an overview of the Constrained Progressive Reversal (CPR) method for computing decays, age dating, and spoof detecting. The CPR method is: Capable of temporal profiling a SNM sample; Precise (compared with known decay code, such a ORIGEN); Easy (for computer implementation and analysis). ? We have illustrated with real SNM data using CPR for age dating and spoof detection. If SNM is pure, may use CPR to derive its age. If SNM is mixed, CPR will indicate that it is mixed or spoofed.

None

2012-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

399

DATE : NVLAP LAB CODE: NVLAP EFFICIENCY OF ELECTRIC MOTORS APPLICATION (REV. 2013-06-11) PAGE 1 OF 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DATE : NVLAP LAB CODE: NVLAP EFFICIENCY OF ELECTRIC MOTORS APPLICATION (REV. 2013-06-11) PAGE 1 OF 1 EFFICIENCY OF ELECTRIC MOTORS TEST METHOD SELECTION LIST Instructions: Check each test method, Method B, on electric motors rated: ________ to ________ horsepower. ____ 24/M02* IEEE 114 Test Procedure

400

Flow Test At Rye Patch Area (DOE GTP, 2011) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test At Rye Patch Area (DOE GTP, 2011) Exploration Activity Details Location Rye Patch Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Queen's University Environmental Health & Safety Date Issued  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Queen's University Environmental Health & Safety Date Issued: November 27, 2013 Page No.: 1: The Department of Environmental Health & Safety 1.0 Introduction Queen's University acknowledges that the use of the Aboriginal culture and heritage. This standard operating procedure outlines the University's guidelines

Graham, Nick

402

Proposed Start Date: Title of Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Proposed Start Date: Title of Project: 1 Department:Principal Investigator(s): 1. College: Phone/ Email: 5 6 7 8 Does project involve: Human subjects? No Yes VertebrateAnimals? No Yes Radioactive understand and agree to comply with the URI policies and procedures for misconduct, conflict of interest

Rhode Island, University of

403

2011 TRAINING DATES January 10-12  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2011 TRAINING DATES January 10-12 March 1-3 April 11-13 June 7-9 July 26-28 September 6-8 November: Tools and Functionality Professional Development Training Course OVERVIEW ArcGIS Desktop II: Tools come- first serve basis. · The workshop registration cost is $650. Payment is due prior to the training

404

CURRICULUM VITAE DATE PREPARED: September 5, 2007  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CURRICULUM VITAE DATE PREPARED: September 5, 2007 PART I: General Information Education 2000- Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM), Member HMS Curriculum Vitae Page 1 of 14 #12;2005- Society for Neuroscience (SFN), Member HMS Curriculum Vitae Page 2 of 14 #12;Part II: Research, Teaching

Boas, David

405

Photo Contest Closing date 2013 9 19  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2013 About Photo Contest Closing date 2013 9 19 Photo Contest Eligibility International) (8MB ) By E-Mail (Maximum size 8MB per photo, up to 2 photos) kisc-koryu@edu.kobe-u.ac.jp 2) CD-R () By Post or submit by hand to KISC Photos (up to 2 photos) burned on a CD-R. Note that your data

Banbara, Mutsunori

406

SAVE THE DATE! Saskatchewan Epidemiology Association  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SAVE THE DATE! Saskatchewan Epidemiology Association Annual Fall Symposium & Workshop November 9 look forward to presentations by: Saskatchewan's Chief Medical Health Officer, Dr. Moira Mc of Regina ­ expert in climate change on the prairies Saskatchewan-based veterinarian ­ name to be announced

Saskatchewan, University of

407

Date ______________________ New York City Fire Department  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

familiar with the fire protection and fire suppression systems in the premises where heDate ______________________ New York City Fire Department Bureau of Fire Prevention 9 Metro received training in 3RCNY §10-01, Fire Code Sections 2701 - 2703 & 2706, the New C-14 study material

Jia, Songtao

408

Lorem & Ipsum [Insert Date \\ Issue] EQUINEBOOSTERSOFMSU  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

] Check out the MSU Colt Starting Class on Facebook! Keep up to date on the progress of our students the know-how and the connections with buyers across the United States. Headwaters Livestock, located in Three Forks, MT holds cattle sales every Monday and horse sales as announced. Special feeder, stock cow

Dyer, Bill

409

Flow Test At Maui Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011) GTP ARRA Spreadsheet Additional References Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

410

Flow Test At Chena Geothermal Area (Holdmann, Et Al., 2006) ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Exploration Activity Details Location Chena Geothermal Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date 2005 - 2007 Usefulness useful DOE-funding Unknown Exploration Basis...

411

Announced United States nuclear tests, July 1945--December 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document lists chronologically and alphabetically by event name all nuclear tests conducted and announced by the United States from July 1945 to December 1990 with the exception of the GMX experiments. Discussion is included on test dates, test series, test yields, test locations, test types and purposes, test totals for Nevada Test Site (NTS) detection of radioactivity from NTS events, and categorization of NTS nuclear tests. Briefly discussed are agreements between the US and the Soviet Union regarding test banning. (MB)

Not Available

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

Date of Birth Declaration Office of the Registrar  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that shows your birth date. (Examples: Driver's License, Birth Certificate, Passport, court or other legalDate of Birth Declaration Office of the Registrar http://registrar.wisc.edu OFFICE USE ONLY Date Date of Birth Month: Day: Year: By my signature, I hereby claim that my correct day of birth

Yavuz, Deniz

413

Property:StartDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

StartDate" StartDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 1 April 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 1 August 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 1 December 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 1 February 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 1 February 2009 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 1 January 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 1 January 2009 +

414

Research Highlights Sorted by Submission Date  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Submission Date Submission Date January 2014 Forecast Calls for Better Models: Examining the Core Components of Arctic Clouds to Clear Their Influence on Climate ARM ASR Ovink, J. December 2013 Effect of Environmental Instability on the Sensitivity of Convection to the Rimed Ice Species ASR Van Weverberg, K. All Mixed Up-Probing Large and Small Scale Turbulence Structures in Continental Stratocumulus Clouds ARM ASR Fang, M., Albrecht, B. A. Ground Stations Likely Get a Boost from Satellites to Estimate Carbon Dioxide Emissions ARM Roeder, L. R. November 2013 Spectro-microscopic Measurements of Carbonaceous Aerosol Aging in Central California ARM ASR Gilles, M., Moffet, R. Digging Into Climate Models' Needs with SPADE ARM ASR Gustafson, W. I. Nailing Down Ice in a Cloud Model ARM ASR

415

Property:EndDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

using the property "EndDate" using the property "EndDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 1 May 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 1 September 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 1 January 2009 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 1 March 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 1 March 2009 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 1 February 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 1 February 2009 +

416

Evaluation of the commercial FBR introduction date  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report examines one criterion for introducing a commercial FBR: economic competitiveness with a Light Water Reactor (LWR). For this analysis, the commercial FBR is assumed to be the fifth-of-a kind replicate which represents an economically mature plant. This FBR is deemed economically competitive when its life-cycle energy cost is less than or equal to that of an LWR. Results of this analysis are used in a comparative analysis of alternative FBR development stategies. The strategies evaluated in these studies assume both 1000- and 1457-MWe FBRs. Since the capital costs per kilowatt, and therefore the energy costs, for these two FBR sizes are different, they will become economically competitive at different times. The probability density function for the 1457-MW(e) FBR has an expected value date or weighted average date of 2030, compared with 2033 for the probability density function for the 1000-MW(e) FBR.

White, M.K.; Merrill, E.T.

1981-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Application of dating for searching geothermic sources  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Geothermical field is usually associated with a volcanic region and, therefore, with an abundance of volcanic glasses such as obsidians. The magmatic chambers constitute an excellent source of heat for a geothermical system. These chambers can be geologically identified from the surface by its recent volcanic products. Therefore, the geological age of the volcanic units is of great interest for a location of a worthwile thermal energy field. This paper presents some preliminary results of the ages obtained by dating obsidians.

L. Gutirrez-Negrin; A. Lpez-Martnez; M. Balczar-Garca

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

Position Description Report Run Date Aug 28 2013 10:03AM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

developer in all phases of analysis, design, implementation, testing, and integration of cloud applicationsPosition Description Report Run Date Aug 28 2013 10:03AM Position Number: 02015821 Dept: IET APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT - 061419 Position: SENIOR CLOUD INTEGRATION LEAD Approved Payroll Title Code: 7289

California at Davis, University of

419

Position Description Report Run Date Aug 28 2013 2:46PM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of analysis, design, implementation, testing, and integration of applications supported by EAISPosition Description Report Run Date Aug 28 2013 2:46PM Position Number: TBD Dept: IET APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT - 061419 Position: APPLICATION DEVELOPER Approved Payroll Title Code: TBD Approved Payroll Title

California at Davis, University of

420

Home Energy Score: Analysis & Improvements to Date  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Home Energy Score: Home Energy Score: � Analysis & Improvements to Date � Joan Glickman Senior Advisor/Program Manager U.S. Department of Energy July 24, 2012 1 eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview 1) Background 2) Program Improvements 3) Analysis: Efficacy of Tool & Program - Asset Perturbations - Behavior Perturbations - Estimated Energy Use vs. Actual Energy Use (from utility bills) - Time Required for Assessment and Scoring - Blower Door Test Analysis 4) Next Steps & Ongoing Analysis 2 eere.energy.gov 1. Background � 3 eere.energy.gov Guiding Principles * Information must be credible, reliable, and replicable. * Information must be transparent and easy to understand. � * Implementation costs must be affordable. * Program must include effective quality assurance.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

CERTS Microgrid Laboratory Test Bed - PIER Final Project Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of AEPSC. DTC Registered Procedure CERTS Microgrid Test PlanTarget Group: Assigned Procedure Review Date: 23 Feb. 2008document is to establish procedures for testing of the CERTS

Eto, Joseph H.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

HSPD-12 Implementation Status Report Updated Date:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Implementation Status Report Implementation Status Report Updated Date: Number of Employees requiring PIV credentials* Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check* Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process* Number of Employees with completed/adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation)* Total Number of PIV credentials Issued to Employees* Number of Contractors requiring PIV credentials Number of Contractors requiring NACIs (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check Number of Contractors requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process Number of Contractors with

423

Predicted 2014 Apple Harvest Dates Phillip Schwallier, District Horticulture Educator  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Predicted 2014 Apple Harvest Dates Phillip Schwallier, District Horticulture Educator Amy Irish. This moderate to heavy crop will mature close predicted dates. Blocks with light croploads will mature 3 or 4

424

Property:Incentive/StartDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

StartDate StartDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/StartDate Property Type Date Description Start Date. In order to see all values for this property, Property:Incentive/StartDateString should be used in queries until only valid dates are in this property. Currently, some entries include notes after the date or are just notes. Subproperties This property has the following 50 subproperties: A Alcohol Fuels Exemption (Hawaii) Alternative Energy Personal Property Tax Exemption (Michigan) Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credits (Maryland) B Broward County - Energy Sense Appliance Rebate Program (Florida) C CCEF - Commercial, Industrial, Institutional PV Grant Program (Connecticut) California Solar Initiative - Solar Thermal Program (California)

425

AHAM- CCE Overview and Update, dated 06/07/2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is U.S. Department of Energy's presentation titled "AHAM - CCE Overview and Update", dated June 7, 2011.

426

2012 -2013 BIRTH DATE VERIFICATION STUDENT NAME: SPU ID  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

an official copy of your Birth Certificate, Passport, or Driver's License with this form and we will update2012 - 2013 BIRTH DATE VERIFICATION STUDENT NAME: SPU ID: The date of birth reported on your Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) does not match the date of birth reported in one of the following

Nelson, Tim

427

2013 -2014 BIRTH DATE VERIFICATION STUDENT NAME: SPU ID  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

an official copy of your Birth Certificate, Passport, or Driver's License with this form and we will update2013 - 2014 BIRTH DATE VERIFICATION STUDENT NAME: SPU ID: The date of birth reported on your Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) does not match the date of birth reported in one of the following

Nelson, Tim

428

Student ID Number Date of birth Cell Phone  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Name Student ID Number Date of birth Cell Phone New Housing Student Current Housing Student All's phone Crime 2 Information about charges or crime convicted of Date of conviction Court convicted in Sentence received Probation dates Probation officer's name Probation officer's phone Consent: I authorize

Pantaleone, Jim

429

Title/Loc/Date: Slide # 1 Jo EllisMonaghan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Title/Loc/Date: Slide # 1 Jo Ellis­Monaghan e­mail: joellis@emba.uvm.edu website: http://academics.smcvt.edu/jellis­monaghan #12; Title/Loc/Date: Slide # 2 29(59,(:# . First some problems (network reliability, scheduling; Title/Loc/Date: Slide # 3 6RPH#3UHOLPLQDULHV# # 'HOHWLRQ

Ellis-Monaghan, Joanna

430

Range Creek Calibrated Dates Beta-202190  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

remains of a shallow pit structure. Testing revealed chunks of burned adobe, many with structural Boomgarden for comments and suggestions Figure 5 4. Results for Feature C Feature C (Figure 4) is the burned impressions, and burned beams above the unprepared floor. Testing also yielded 15 artifacts, mostly late stage

Provancher, William

431

United States Government Department of Energy DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

kE FJ325.8 d& * 9 -1 kE FJ325.8 d& * 9 -1 . (8-89) ZFG fO7440 1 United States Government Department of Energy DATE: DEC 2 3 :gg3 REPLY TO ATTN OF: EM-421 (W. A. Williams, 903-8149) SUBJECT: Elimination of the Sites from the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program TO: The File I have reviewed the attached site summaries and elimination recommendations for the following sites: e l Mitts & Merrel Co., Saginaw, Michigan l North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina l National Smelt & Refining, Cleveland, Ohio l Sutton, Steele & Steele, Dallas, Texas --------+. Norfolk Naval Station, Virginia In each case, the potential for radiological contamination above applicable guidelines is small. In each case the amounts of radioactive materials handled was small. Based on these considerations, these sites

432

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management of the NSLS-II Project Management of the NSLS-II Project OAS-RA-L-10-01 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (4/93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 6, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-01 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-32 (A10RA006) SUBJECT: Report on "The Department of Energy's Management of the NSLS-II Project" TO: Manager, Brookhaven Site Office, SC-BHSO INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Science is currently constructing the National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (Brookhaven) in Upton, New York. The NSLS-II is designed to replace the existing

433

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department's Infrastructure Department's Infrastructure Modernization Projects under the Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 OAS-RA-L-11-04 March 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: March 2, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-04 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RA032) SUBJECT: Report on "The Department's Infrastructure Modernization Projects under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009" TO: Manager, Oak Ridge Office Manager, Berkeley Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted on February 17, 2009. The goals of the Recovery Act are to retain or create jobs, increase

434

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Audit Report Audit Report Progress in Implementing the Advanced Batteries and Hybrid Components Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act OAS-RA-L-10-04 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (4/93) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: April 27, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-04 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-32 (A10RA025) SUBJECT: Report on "Progress in Implementing the Advanced Batteries and Hybrid Components Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" TO: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted to

435

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Moab Mill Tailings Cleanup Moab Mill Tailings Cleanup Project OAS-RA-L-10-03 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 23, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-03 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A09ID019) SUBJECT: Report on "Moab Mill Tailings Cleanup Project" TO: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Program and Site Support, EM-50 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project (Moab Project) is located at a former uranium-ore processing facility near Moab, Utah on the west bank of the Colorado River. In 2005, the Department of Energy (Department) issued a Record of Decision to relocate, by rail, approximately 16 million tons of uranium mill tailings from

436

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Science's Energy Frontier Office of Science's Energy Frontier Research Centers OAS-RA-L-10-09 August 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: August 27, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-09 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-32 (A10RA003) SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Office of Science's Energy Frontier Research Centers" TO: Associate Director, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, SC-22 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE In 2008, the Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Science (Science) issued a Funding Opportunity Announcement seeking applications from the scientific community for the establishment of Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs). The purpose of the EFRCs is to integrate the talent and expertise of leading scientists to accelerate the rate of

437

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management of the Tank Farm Management of the Tank Farm Recovery Act Infrastructure Upgrades Project OAS-RA-L-11-03 February 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: February 9, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-03 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RA043) SUBJECT: Report on "Management of the Tank Farm Recovery Act Infrastructure Upgrades Project" TO: Manager, Office of River Protection INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) the Department of Energy (Department) awarded Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) approximately $324 million to accelerate completion of infrastructure upgrades for the Hanford Site's tank farms during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009-2011 timeframe. These funds

438

DOE-EA-1184 Date Prepared:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

184 184 Date Prepared: Prepared by: Environmental Assessment for the Trunsfer of the DPRodd T~uct to the County of Los AIumos Los Alamos, New Mexico Final Document January 23,1997 US Department of Energy Los Alamos Area Office DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use- fulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any spe- cific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufac-

439

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department's Management of Cloud Department's Management of Cloud Computing Services OAS-RA-L-11-06 April 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 1, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-06 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A11TG021) SUBJECT: Report on "Department's Management of Cloud Computing Services" TO: Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration Acting Under Secretary of Energy Under Secretary for Science Chief Information Officer INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Cloud computing enables convenient, on-demand access to shared computing resources that can be rapidly provided to users. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and industry experts, benefits of the cloud computing model include the

440

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Audit Report Summary of Audit Report National Nuclear Security Administration's Use of Innovative Technologies to Meet Security Requirements This document provides a summary of an Audit Report that is not publicly releasable. Public release is controlled pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act OAS-L-09-02 October 2008 The following is a summary o f a Special Access Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information Audit Report, OAS-L-09-02, dated October 31, 2008, entitled "National Nuclear Security Administration's Use o f Innovative Technologies to Meet Security Requirements. The com~lete report is not available for public disclosure. BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (Department) developed the Design Basis Threat policy (DBT), which identified the most credible threats posed by potential adversaries to Departmental assets and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Property:File/CreationDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

CreationDate CreationDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name File/CreationDate Property Type Date Description Original creation date for the file. Note that this is usually not the same as the date when the file was first uploaded to OpenEI. Pages using the property "File/CreationDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BOEMRE OCS.oil.gas.2007-12.map.pdf + 12 September 2008 + BOEMRE atlantic.OCS.multiple.use.map.2003.pdf + October 2003 + BOEMRE lease.platforms.santa.barb.map.5.2010.pdf + 18 May 2010 + BOEMRE oil.gas.plant.platform.sta.brbra.map.4.2010.pdf + April 2010 + BOEMRE platforms.leases.longbeach.map.5.2010.pdf + May 2010 + Banglmetst 221.pdf + 29 December 2004 + Black.Warrior.Basin usgs.map.pdf + 2007 + BrazilTMYst 238.pdf + 1 February 2005 +

442

Property:Incentive/StartDateString | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

StartDateString StartDateString Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/StartDateString Property Type String Description Start Date string property. Use this property in queries until the Property:Incentive/StartDate property is populated with valid dates only. Currently, some are populated with additional notes included. Pages using the property "Incentive/StartDateString" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 3 30% Business Tax Credit for Solar (Vermont) + 01/01/2009 + A AEP Appalachian Power - Commercial and Industrial Rebate Programs (West Virginia) + 3/11/2011 + AEP Appalachian Power - Residential Home Retrofit Program (West Virginia) + 3/11/2011 + AEP Ohio - Commercial Self Direct Rebate Program (Ohio) + 1/1/2008 +

443

Maintenance Sheet for 2013 Chevrolet Malibu 1LT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Date Mileage Description Cost 1172013 7,625 Changed oil and inspected generator control module - under warranty NC 1282013 9,105 Rotated tires 15.00 4172013 23,104 Changed...

444

Maintenance Sheet for 2013 Chevrolet Volt  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0DU103929 Date Mileage Description Cost 342013 4,876 Replaced relay assembly, engine control module, and 12V battery - under warranty NC 342013 4,876 Reflashed parking brake...

445

Maintenance Sheet for 2011 Hyundai Sonata  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7BA003539 Date Mileage Description Cost 7192011 5,720 Changed oil and filter 14.67 10122011 11,152 Changed oil and filter and rotated tires 60.49 10212011 12,342 Upgraded...

446

Maintenance Records for 2010 Ford Fusion vin#4757  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ford Fusion VIN 3FADP0L34AR144757 Date Mileage Description Cost 1142010 6,330 Changed oil and filter and inspected brake system 46.83 2112010 12,302 Changed oil and filter...

447

Maintenance Records for 2010 Toyota Prius vin#0462  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DU2A5010462 Date Mileage Description Cost 11232009 5,935 Changed oil and filter, rotated tires, and inspected brakes 31.75 12182009 13,330 Changed oil and filter and inspected...

448

Maintenance Records for 2010 Honda Insight EX vin 0141  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Insight EX VIN JHMZE2H78AS010141 Date Mileage Description Cost 12102009 5,947 Changed oil and filter and inspected brake system 30.44 252010 11,011 Changed oil and filter and...

449

Commitcoin: Carbon dating commitments with bitcoin  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Abstract. In the standard definition of a commitment scheme, the sender commits to a message and immediately sends the commitment to the recipient interested in it. However the sender may not always know at the time of commitment who will become interested in verifying it. Further, when the interested party does emerge, it could be critical to establish when the commitment was made. Employing a proof of work protocol at commitment time will later allow anyone to carbon date when the commitment was made, approximately, without trusting any external parties. We present CommitCoin, an instantiation of this approach that harnesses the existing processing power of the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network; a network used to mint and trade digital cash. 1 Introductory Remarks Consider the scenario where Alice makes an important discovery. It is important to her that she receives recognition for her breakthrough, however she would also like to keep it a secret until she can establish a suitable infrastructure for monetizing it. By forgoing publication of her discovery, she risks Bob independently making the same discovery and publicizing it as his own. Folklore suggests that Alice might mail herself a copy of her discovery and leave the letter sealed, with the postal services timestamp intact, for a later resolution time. If Bob later claims the same discovery, the

Jeremy Clark; Er Essex

450

Property:ExpActivityDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ExpActivityDate ExpActivityDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name ExpActivityDate Property Type Date Description Exploration Activity Date started or year of activity. Pages using the property "ExpActivityDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 2 2-M Probe At Desert Peak Area (Sladek, Et Al., 2007) + 2007 + 2-M Probe Survey At Coso Geothermal Area (1977) + 1977 + 2-M Probe Survey At Coso Geothermal Area (1979) + 1979 + 2-M Probe Survey At Coso Geothermal Area (2007) + 2007 + 2-M Probe Survey At Salt Wells Area (Coolbaugh, Et Al., 2006) + 2005 + 2-M Probe Survey At Salt Wells Area (Skord, Et Al., 2011) + 2011 + A Acoustic Logs At Coso Geothermal Area (1977) + 1977 + Acoustic Logs At Coso Geothermal Area (2005) + 2005 +

451

Property:ExpActivityDateEnd | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ExpActivityDateEnd ExpActivityDateEnd Jump to: navigation, search Property Name ExpActivityDateEnd Property Type Date Description Date or year exploration activity ended. Pages using the property "ExpActivityDateEnd" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 2 2-M Probe Survey At Salt Wells Area (Coolbaugh, Et Al., 2006) + 2006 + 2-M Probe Survey At Salt Wells Area (Skord, Et Al., 2011) + 2011 + A Aerial Photography At Coso Geothermal Area (1968-1971) + 1971 + C Compound and Elemental Analysis At Salt Wells Area (Coolbaugh, Et Al., 2006) + 2005 + Compound and Elemental Analysis At Salt Wells Area (Shevenell & Garside, 2003) + 2002 + Conceptual Model At Coso Geothermal Area (2005-2007) + 2007 + Controlled Source Frequency-Domain Magnetics At Salt Wells Area (Montgomery, Et Al., 2005) + 2004 +

452

Property:OpenEI/CETSI/PublicationDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

OpenEI/CETSI/PublicationDate OpenEI/CETSI/PublicationDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name OpenEI/CETSI/PublicationDate Property Type Date Description The date the resource was first published. Pages using the property "OpenEI/CETSI/PublicationDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) A A Guide to Community Solar: Utility, Private, and Non-profit Project Development + 1 November 2010 + An Overview of Existing Wind Energy Ordinances + 1 December 2008 + Animal Farm Powers Village + 18 April 2011 + Assessment of the Technical Potential for Micro-Cogeneration in Small Commercial Buildings across the United States + 5 January 2008 + C City of Aspen Climate Action Plan + 1 May 2007 + Climate Action Planning: A Review of Best Practices, Key Elements, and Common Climate Strategies for Signatories to the American College & University Presidents' Climate Commitment + 5 October 2010 +

453

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Date Date Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date September 3, 2014 CX-011089: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low-cost, Highly Transparent Flexible Low-e Coating Film to Enable Electrochromic Windows with Increased Energy Savings CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/03/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office November 22, 2013 CX-010734: Categorical Exclusion Determination Covington District Culvert Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2013 CX-010735: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell No.5 Dead End Insulator Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

454

Property:HPBD/DateOfOccupancy | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DateOfOccupancy DateOfOccupancy Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type Date. Subproperties This property has the following 10 subproperties: H High Performance Buildings Database High Performance Buildings Database High Performance Buildings Database H cont. High Performance Buildings Database High Performance Buildings Database High Performance Buildings Database High Performance Buildings Database H cont. High Performance Buildings Database High Performance Buildings Database High Performance Buildings Database Pages using the property "HPBD/DateOfOccupancy" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) H High Performance Buildings Database + January 4 + High Performance Buildings Database + January 6 + High Performance Buildings Database + October 2 +

455

EV Project Overview Report - Project to Date through December...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 2011 Charging Infrastructure Number of EV Project Number of Electricity Charging Units Charging Events Consumed Region Installed To Date Performed (AC MWh) Phoenix, AZ...

456

SAVE THE DATE - 2015 National Environmental Justice Conference...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Documents & Publications 2014 NEJC Save the Date (English) ITP Aluminum: Technical Working Group on Inert Anode Technologies Leadership Transition Program (LTP) Application Package...

457

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Last Name First Name Date Institution  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Funding Source Research Proprietary Non-proprietary (publication in open source or peer review journal expected) Objectives: Abstract: SCHEDULING Expected start date for...

458

Flow Test At Jemez Pueblo Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GTP) Exploration Activity Details Location Jemez Pueblo Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011)...

459

Flow Test At Crump's Hot Springs Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Details Location Crump's Hot Springs Geothermal Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011)...

460

Flow Test At Silver Peak Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011) GTP ARRA Spreadsheet Additional References Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Flow Test At Steamboat Springs Area (Combs, Et Al., 1999) | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Exploration Activity Details Location Steamboat Springs Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References Jim Combs, John...

462

Flow Test At Fish Lake Valley Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011) GTP ARRA Spreadsheet Additional References Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

463

Flow Test At Newberry Caldera Area (DOE GTP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Exploration Activity Details Location Newberry Caldera Area Exploration Technique Flow Test Activity Date Usefulness not indicated DOE-funding Unknown References (1 January 2011)...

464

Random Testing versus Partition Testing.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

?? The difference between Partition Testing and Random Testing has been thoroughlyinvestigated theoretically. In this thesis we present a practical study ofthe differences between random (more)

Oftedal, Kristian

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Mercedes-Benz  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles 2 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 21 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 Coupe 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 Coupe 21 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic Prem 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway E85 13 City 15 Combined 18 Highway 2012 Mercedes-Benz C350 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline

466

Gas Mileage of 2013 Vehicles by Mercedes-Benz  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles 3 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2013 Mercedes-Benz C250 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Mercedes-Benz C250 22 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2013 Mercedes-Benz C250 Coupe 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Mercedes-Benz C250 Coupe 22 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2013 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 20 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 2013 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2013 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic Prem 20 City 22 Combined 27 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2013 Mercedes-Benz C350 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2013 Mercedes-Benz C350 Prem 20

467

Gas Mileage of 2012 Vehicles by Rolls-Royce  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Rolls-Royce Vehicles 2 Rolls-Royce Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2012 Rolls-Royce Ghost 12 cyl, 6.6 L, Automatic (S8), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Rolls-Royce Ghost 13 City 15 Combined 20 Highway 2012 Rolls-Royce Ghost EWB 12 cyl, 6.6 L, Automatic (S8), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Rolls-Royce Ghost EWB 13 City 15 Combined 20 Highway 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom 12 cyl, 6.7 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom 11 City 14 Combined 18 Highway 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 12 cyl, 6.7 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 11 City 14 Combined 18 Highway 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe 12 cyl, 6.7 L, Automatic (S6), Premium Gasoline Compare 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe 11 City 14 Combined 18

468

Gas Mileage of 2011 Vehicles by Mercedes-Benz  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles 1 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Prem 18 City 21 Combined 26 Highway E85 13 City 15 Combined 19 Highway 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 17 City 20 Combined 24 Highway 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic Prem 18 City 20 Combined 25 Highway E85 13 City 15 Combined 19 Highway 2011 Mercedes-Benz C350 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline

469

Gas Mileage of 2014 Vehicles by Mercedes-Benz  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles 4 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2014 Mercedes-Benz C250 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Mercedes-Benz C250 22 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2014 Mercedes-Benz C250 Coupe 4 cyl, 1.8 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Mercedes-Benz C250 Coupe 22 City 25 Combined 31 Highway 2014 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 20 City 23 Combined 29 Highway 2014 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2014 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic Prem 20 City 22 Combined 27 Highway E85 14 City 16 Combined 20 Highway 2014 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 6 cyl, 3.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2014 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic 20

470

Gas Mileage of 2008 Vehicles by Roush Performance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Roush Performance Vehicles 8 Roush Performance Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 2WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 2WD 11 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 4WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 4WD 11 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 2WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 2WD 11 City 13 Combined 15 Highway 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 4WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2008 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 4WD 11

471

Gas Mileage of 2007 Vehicles by Mercedes-Benz  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles 7 Mercedes-Benz Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2007 Mercedes-Benz C230 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2007 Mercedes-Benz C230 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners Prem 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway E85 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2007 Mercedes-Benz C230 6 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 6-spd, Premium Gas or E85 Compare 2007 Mercedes-Benz C230 Prem 17 City 19 Combined 23 Highway E85 13 City 14 Combined 17 Highway 2007 Mercedes-Benz C280 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 7-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 Mercedes-Benz C280 View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners 19 City 22 Combined 26 Highway 2007 Mercedes-Benz C280 4matic 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 5-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 Mercedes-Benz C280 4matic View MPG Estimates Shared By Vehicle Owners

472

Gas Mileage of 1984 Vehicles by American Motors Corporation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 American Motors Corporation Vehicles 4 American Motors Corporation Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 19 City 20 Combined 22 Highway 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 19 City 21 Combined 23 Highway 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Automatic 3-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 15 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Manual 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 16 City 17 Combined 20 Highway 1984 American Motors Corporation Eagle 4WD 6 cyl, 4.2 L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline

473

Gas Mileage of 2007 Vehicles by Roush Performance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Roush Performance Vehicles 7 Roush Performance Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 2WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 2WD 11 City 12 Combined 14 Highway 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 4WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Regular Cab 4WD 11 City 12 Combined 14 Highway 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 2WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 2WD 11 City 12 Combined 14 Highway 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 4WD 8 cyl, 5.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Premium Gasoline Compare 2007 Roush Performance Stage 3 F150 Super Cab 4WD 11

474

Gas Mileage of 1993 Vehicles by J.K. Motors  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 J.K. Motors Vehicles 3 J.K. Motors Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 1993 J.K. Motors 190E 2.3 MERC BENZ 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 J.K. Motors 190E 2.3 MERC BENZ 16 City 17 Combined 18 Highway 1993 J.K. Motors 230E MERC BENZ 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 J.K. Motors 230E MERC BENZ 16 City 17 Combined 18 Highway 1993 J.K. Motors 300SL 6 cyl, 3.0 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 J.K. Motors 300SL 14 City 15 Combined 16 Highway 1993 J.K. Motors BMW535I 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 J.K. Motors BMW535I 12 City 14 Combined 18 Highway 1993 J.K. Motors BMW635CSI 6 cyl, 3.4 L, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline Compare 1993 J.K. Motors BMW635CSI 12 City 14 Combined 18

475

CITIES AND MILEAGE IN PA Abingdon Heights 252  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(Longwood) 86 King of Prussia 125-135 Kings Gap 139 Kinzers 34 Kutztown 116 Lafayette Hill 130 Lake City Newtown (Bucks County) 150 Newtown (near Wilkes Barre) 225 Norristown 128 North Wales 135 Northampton 180

Hardy, Christopher R.

476

Gas Mileage of 2013 Vehicles by Rolls-Royce  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Rolls-Royce Vehicles 3 Rolls-Royce Vehicles EPA MPG MODEL City Comb Hwy 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost 12 cyl, 6.6 L, Automatic (S8), Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost 13 City 15 Combined 21 Highway 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost EWB 12 cyl, 6.6 L, Automatic (S8), Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost EWB 13 City 15 Combined 21 Highway 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom 12 cyl, 6.7 L, Automatic (S8), Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom 11 City 14 Combined 19 Highway 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 12 cyl, 6.7 L, Automatic (S8), Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 11 City 14 Combined 19 Highway 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe 12 cyl, 6.7 L, Automatic (S8), Premium Gasoline Compare 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe 11 City 14 Combined 19

477

Drug Testing for New Clearance Holders  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Drug Testing Prerequisite for DOE Security Clearance Applicants Drug Testing Prerequisite for DOE Security Clearance Applicants The following matrix identifies those individuals required to have a current negative drug test as a prerequisite for being processed for a security clearance. A current test is one taken within 60 calendar days of the individual's SF-86/SF-86C signature date. For those cases where no such form is collected (e.g. reciprocity) the test must have been taken within 60 calendar days of the date of the request for security clearance. Current Status Clearance Action Test Required? Uncleared - Applicant Grant (Q/L, T/S/C) Yes Previously Cleared DOE-now uncleared DOE Reinstate (Q/L, T/S/C) Yes* Coming from another Federal agency, regardless of clearance status Grant (Q/L, T/S/C) Yes**

478

Drug Testing for New Clearance Holders  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Drug Testing Prerequisite for DOE Security Clearance Applicants Drug Testing Prerequisite for DOE Security Clearance Applicants The following matrix identifies those individuals required to have a current negative drug test as a prerequisite for being processed for a security clearance. A current test is one taken within 60 calendar days of the individual's SF-86/SF-86C signature date. For those cases where no such form is collected (e.g. reciprocity) the test must have been taken within 60 calendar days of the date of the request for security clearance. Current Status Clearance Action Test Required? Uncleared - Applicant Grant (Q/L, T/S/C) Yes Previously Cleared DOE-now uncleared DOE Reinstate (Q/L, T/S/C) Yes* Coming from another Federal agency, regardless of clearance status Grant (Q/L, T/S/C) Yes**

479

2014 BRUIN WOODS SUMMER STAFF APPLICATION Name Birth Date  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2014 BRUIN WOODS SUMMER STAFF APPLICATION Name Birth Date School Address Home Address Phone # ( ) E, Activities and Awards SKILLS, CERTIFICATES & QUALIFICATIONS CAMP SKILLS: On a scale of "0" (no knowledge_____________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATIONS (List expiration dates and certifying organizations) Lifeguard Boating Certification Archery

Williams, Gary A.

480

2012 BRUIN WOODS SUMMER STAFF APPLICATION Name Birth Date  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2012 BRUIN WOODS SUMMER STAFF APPLICATION Name Birth Date School Address Home Address Phone # ( ) E, Activities and Awards SKILLS, CERTIFICATES & QUALIFICATIONS CAMP SKILLS: On a scale of 0 (no knowledge) to 3_____________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATIONS (List expiration dates and certifying organizations) Lifeguard Boating Certification NRA Riflery

Grether, Gregory

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "testing date mileage" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

2013 BRUIN WOODS SUMMER STAFF APPLICATION Name Birth Date  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2013 BRUIN WOODS SUMMER STAFF APPLICATION Name Birth Date School Address Home Address Phone # ( ) E, Activities and Awards SKILLS, CERTIFICATES & QUALIFICATIONS CAMP SKILLS: On a scale of "0" (no knowledge_____________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATIONS (List expiration dates and certifying organizations) Lifeguard Boating Certification NRA Riflery

Williams, Gary A.

482

Computer Engineering Graduate Handbook Dated: February 06, 2014  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Computer Engineering Graduate Handbook Dated: February 06, 2014 MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING Computer Engineering Program College of Engineering & Computer Science California State University-278-5987 Fax: 657-278-5804 http://www.fullerton.edu/ecs/cpe #12;Computer Engineering Graduate Handbook Dated

de Lijser, Peter

483

Form Date 4/4/01 Refrigerant Service Order Form  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Recovery Unit ID # : Added Lbs oz Lbs oz Lbs oz Startup Charge Net Refrigerant Added: Lbs oz Parts UsedForm Date 4/4/01 Refrigerant Service Order Form Service ID: Owner: Work Order #: Building: Date: Issued: Completed: Equipment ID: Technicians: Location: Model: Manufact: Serial #: Refrigerant Type

Russell, Lynn

484

Revision Date 01.11.13 PROCUREMENT SERVICES -LOGISTICS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revision Date 01.11.13 PROCUREMENT SERVICES - LOGISTICS Reading and Reconciling an ePro and MMD with your FACSID. Prerequisites: None Find Help: Email logistics_team@unc.edu #12;Procurement Services - Logistics Reading and Reconciling an ePro and MMD Statement Revision Date 01.11.13 Page 2 of 6 Departmental

Crews, Stephen

485

Dating Pleistocene Archeological Sites by Protein Diagenesis in Ostrich Eggshell  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...loss than bone but were still depleted by 60% when the epimerization...I ratios and radiocarbon or uranium-series dates from each site...and A. J. T. Tull; and uranium-series dates were provided...Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892. H...

A. S. Brooks; P. E. Hare; J. E. Kokis; G. H. Miller; R. D. Ernst; F. Wendorf

1990-04-06T23:59:59.000Z

486

An early date for cattle from Namaqualand, South Africa  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An early date for cattle from Namaqualand, South Africa: implications for the origins of herding did cattle come to South Africa? Radiocarbon dates on a newly found cow horn indicates a time, the authors favour immigrants moving along a western route through Namibia. Keywords: South Africa

487

Key Dates | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Key Dates Key Dates Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Einstein Fellowship Home Eligibility Benefits Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Key Dates Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Key Dates for the 2014-2015 Einstein Fellowship Application process. On-line Application Opens September 24, 2013 Application Deadline 5:00pm EST December 4, 2013 Application Review 7-8 weeks Notification to Semi-Finalists [Travel Arrangements made for Interviews in Washington, DC] Late January 2014 Interviews in Washington, DC February 23-25, 2014 Finalists Notifications March 2014 Congressional Fellows Placement Interviews June - July 2014 Fellows Arrive in Washington, DC August 2014 Orientation meeting for the 2014-2015 Einstein Fellows

488

ICE Cleaning Test Report.PDF  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

16 16 FIELD DEMONSTRATION OF THE ICE 250 TM CLEANING SYSTEM AT THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN OILFIELD TESTING CENTER CASPER, WYOMING August 18-19, 1999 Date Published: October 5, 1999 J.L. Johnston L.M. Jackson PREPARED FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/ROCKY MOUNTAIN OILFIELD TESTING CENTER Work Performed Under Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC) CRADA No. 99-009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.............................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 Product Description ...........................................................................................................................1

489

Date | 1Refrigeration and Air Conditioning EMA Education and Training Date | 2Refrigeration and Air Conditioning EMA Education and Training  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Date | 1Refrigeration and Air Conditioning EMA Education and Training #12;Date | 2Refrigeration operating pressure (MOP) 5. De-humidifying (Te control) 6. Defrost funtions 7. Loss of charge detection (LOC control) 6. Defrost funtions 7. Loss of charge detection (LOC) 8. Bleed function 9. Sensor placement tips

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

490

VEHICLE DETAILS AND BATTERY SPECIFICATIONS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RR0DF106791 RR0DF106791 Hybrid Propulsion System: Mild Parallel Belt-Alternator Starter (BAS) Number of Electric Machines: 1 Motor: 15 kW (peak), AC induction Battery Specifications Manufacturer: Hitachi Type: Cylindrical Lithium-ion Number of Cells: 32 Nominal Cell Voltage: 3.6 V Nominal System Voltage: 115.2 V Rated Pack Capacity: 4.4 Ah Maximum Cell Charge Voltage 2 : 4.10 V Minimum Cell Discharge Voltage 2 : 3.00 V Thermal Management: Active - Forced air Pack Weight: 65 lb BEGINNING-OF-TEST: BATTERY LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Vehicle Mileage and Testing Date Vehicle Odometer: 5,715 mi Date of Test: January 8, 2013 Static Capacity Test Measured Average Capacity: 3.98 Ah Measured Average Energy Capacity: 460 Wh HPPC Test Pulse Discharge Power @ 50% DOD

491

VEHICLE DETAILS AND BATTERY SPECIFICATIONS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RRXDF106605 RRXDF106605 Hybrid Propulsion System: Mild Parallel Belt-Alternator Starter (BAS) Number of Electric Machines: 1 Motor: 15 kW (peak), AC induction Battery Specifications Manufacturer: Hitachi Type: Cylindrical Lithium-ion Number of Cells: 32 Nominal Cell Voltage: 3.6 V Nominal System Voltage: 115.2 V Rated Pack Capacity: 4.4 Ah Maximum Cell Charge Voltage 2 : 4.10 V Minimum Cell Discharge Voltage 2 : 3.00 V Thermal Management: Active - Forced air Pack Weight: 65 lb BEGINNING-OF-TEST: BATTERY LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Vehicle Mileage and Testing Date Vehicle Odometer: 4,244 mi Date of Test: January 9, 2013 Static Capacity Test Measured Average Capacity: 3.88 Ah Measured Average Energy Capacity: 450 Wh HPPC Test Pulse Discharge Power @ 50% DOD

492

Mobile Testing  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Mobile apps are everywhere. Some apps entertain and others enable business transactions. Apps increasingly interact with complex IT landscapes. For example, a banking app on a mobile device acts as a front end that invokes services on a back-end server ... Keywords: mobile apps, mobile devices, software quality management, software testing, test automation, test strategy

Klaus Haller

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

I HEHORANDIJH I TO{ FILE DATE SUti.lECTa I O&R(S)  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

HEHORANDIJH HEHORANDIJH I TO{ FILE DATE SUti.lECTa I O&R(S) -------- lyaa * ------------------------ currwlt * ~e.Gd. ------------------------ Owner contacted Ja Yes 0 no; if ym, date contact=d--~~~?~~-2--- :TY+E OF OPERATION --------- - ---- Research & Development 0 Facility Type Production scale testing Pi lot Scale Bench Scale Process Theoretical Studies *i Sample & &balysis a Hanuf ??cturing a University 0 Research Organization 0 Sov~rnment Sponsored Facjlity a Other --------------------- I *l IPr~oduction Q Di8poklKtorage ?? rrimo cl Other information (i.e., cost 0 +bcontractor + fixed fem. unit price, ?? Purchase Order time 81 material, ?? tc) , ---------------------------- kontract,Purchame Order # kJ -?!a se -fiti & ~~~-~~~~~~~~~~--=~~-=------~ ----------w--mm -- E!!me~IEJ!L~E~~~~:

494

America's Wind Testing Facilities | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Wind Testing Facilities Wind Testing Facilities America's Wind Testing Facilities Addthis National Wind Technology Center - Colorado 1 of 7 National Wind Technology Center - Colorado The first of 4 towers is lifted as work continues on the 2 MW Gamesa wind turbine being installed at NREL's National Wind Technology Center (NWTC). | Photo by Dennis Schroeder. Date taken: 2011-09-15 13:53 National Wind Technology Center - Colorado 2 of 7 National Wind Technology Center - Colorado Workers use a giant crane for lifting the blade assembly as work continues on the 2 MW Gamesa wind turbine being installed at NREL's National Wind Technology Center (NWTC). | Photo by Dennis Schroeder. Date taken: 2011-09-22 12:06 Wind Technology Testing Center - Boston 3 of 7 Wind Technology Testing Center - Boston

495

ENERGY STAR Appliance Verification Testing - Pilot Program Summary Report dated February 3, 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- February 3, 2012 ENERGY STAR® is a joint program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with a dual focus on energy and cost savings. These goals are reached through a combination of increasing customer awareness, partnering with over 15,000 private and public sector organizations and driving widespread technological advances in energy efficiency. ENERGY STAR recognizes three paths to increased daily energy efficiency: bringing to market new energy-efficient products, constructing efficient new homes and commercial buildings, and improving the efficiency of existing homes, commercial buildings and industrial facilities. In 2010, DOE launched a pilot program to verify the energy efficiency and water-use characteristics of

496

Key Dates | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Key Dates Key Dates Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) SULI Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Key Dates Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page At the submission deadline (shown in red) the application system will close, and no materials will be accepted after the submission deadline has passed. The Application System closes at 5:00 PM Eastern Time. SULI Internship Term: Spring 2014 Summer 2014* Fall 2013 On-line Application Opens August 6, 2013 October 18, 2013 May 1, 2013 Applications Due October, 1, 2013 5:00 PM ET January 10, 2014 5:00 PM ET June 12, 2013 5:00 PM ET Offer Notification Period Begins on or around October, 15, 2013 January 20, 2014 June 24, 2013

497

Key Dates | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Key Dates Key Dates Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) VFP Home Eligibility Benefits Participant Obligations How to Apply Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home Key Dates Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page At the submission deadline (shown in red) the application system will close, and no materials will be accepted after the submission deadline has passed. The Application System closes at 5:00 PM Eastern Time. VFP Term: Summer 2014 On-line Application Opens October 18, 2013 Applications Due January 10, 2014 5:00 PM ET* Offer Notification Period Begins January 20, 2014 All DOE Offers and Notifications Complete April 1, 2014 *A research proposal co-developed with a DOE laboratory researcher must be electronically submitted by all faculty applicants as part of their

498

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

81: Categorical Exclusion Determination 81: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Instructor Training Network - Midwest Provider CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Wisconsin Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 27, 2012 CX-007880: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evergreen State Solar Partnership CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 27, 2012 CX-007879: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wasatch SunShot Streamlining and Simplifying Solar CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 27, 2012 CX-007878: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Solar Collaboration to Streamline and Enable An Increase in Photovoltaic Capacity CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012

499

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2013 3, 2013 CX-010294: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building For Re-Roofing Project CX(s) Applied: B1.23, B2.1, B2.5 Date: 05/03/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 3, 2013 CX-010292: Categorical Exclusion Determination Modification to the Petrography Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B2.3, B3.6 Date: 05/03/2013 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 3, 2013 CX-010291: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interstate Electrification Improvement CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/03/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 3, 2013 CX-010289: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interstate Electrification Improvement CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/03/2013 Location(s): Texas

500

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2012 8, 2012 CX-009047: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Drainage Near E-004 Basin CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 8, 2012 CX-009046: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pad 16 Perimeter Paving CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 8, 2012 CX-009007: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northeast Provider of Solar Photovoltaic Instructor Training CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.16 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office August 8, 2012 CX-009045: Categorical Exclusion Determination Machining and Fabrication in 723-A CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office