Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Bulk Hauling Equipment for CHG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

load of CHG Semitrailer Mass Trailer or ModuleChassis Module Mass Hydrogen Gas Mass CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR BULK HAULING EQUIPMENT For large consumption, total CapEx for...

2

Bulk Hauling Equipment for CHG  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BULK HAULING EQUIPMENT FOR CHG BULK HAULING EQUIPMENT FOR CHG Don Baldwin Director of Product Development - Hexagon Lincoln HEXAGON LINCOLN TITAN(tm) Module System Compressed Hydrogen Gas * Capacity 250 bar - 616 kg 350 bar - 809 kg 540 bar - 1155 kg * Gross Vehicle Weight (with prime mover) 250 bar - 28 450 kg 350 bar - 30 820 kg 540 bar - 39 440 kg * Purchase Cost 250 bar - $510,000 350 bar - $633,750 540 bar - $1,100,000 Compressed Natural Gas * Capacity (250 bar at 15 C) - 7412 kg * GVW (With prime mover) - 35 250 kg * Purchase Cost (+/- 5%) - $510,000 HEXAGON LINCOLN TITAN(tm) V Magnum Trailer System Compressed Hydrogen Gas * Capacity 250 bar - 800 kg 350 bar - 1050 kg 540 bar - 1500 kg * Gross Vehicle Weight (with prime mover) 250 bar - 31 000 kg 350 bar - 34 200 kg 540 bar - 45 700 kg * Purchase Cost (+/-

3

Certification for DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 and DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 1  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

DOE O 435.1 Chg 1, Radioactive Waste Management and DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual have been reviewed by Environmental Management and is deemed to be in compliance with related Departmental Directives, Secretarial Delegation, organizational structure, budget guidelines, rules, regulations, standards, OMB guidance, relevant memorandums of understanding and public laws.

2007-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

4

Property:Incentive/CodeChgCycle | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

CodeChgCycle CodeChgCycle Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/CodeChgCycle Property Type Text Description Code Change Cycle. Pages using the property "Incentive/CodeChgCycle" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B Building Energy Code (Alabama) + No set schedule. Most recent update effective October 1, 2012 Building Energy Code (Alaska) + No set schedule. Most recent update effective: March 9, 2011 Building Energy Code (Arizona) + No set schedule. Arizona is a home rule state and legislation is the normal route through which changes in the energy code proceed. Building Energy Code (Arkansas) + No set schedule. Most recent residential update effective: October 1, 2004. Building Energy Code (California) + Three-year code change cycle. The 2008 Standards took effect January 1, 2010. The 2012 Standards are scheduled to take effect in 2014.

5

Microsoft Word - o414.1DAdmChg1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

14.1D Chg 1 5-8-2013 ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES TO DOE O 414.1D, QUALITY ASSURANCE Locations of Changes: Page Paragraph Changed To Throughout the Order Reference citations. Revised all...

6

NEW - DOE O 350.1 Chg 5, Contractor Human Resource Management Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This directive establishes DOE responsibilities and requirements for the management and oversight of contractor Human Resource Management (HR) programs. Chg 1, 5-8-98; Chg 2, 11-22-09; Chg 3, 2-23-10; Chg 4, 4-29-13. DOE O 350.1 Chg 5, dated 9-30-2014, cancels DOE O 350.1 Chg 4. The Order is revised to reflect the cancellation of Chapters 1-3 due to the incorporation of these chapters into DOE Order 350.3; reflect organizational changes; delete reference to the DOE Retrospective Rating Insurance Plan, which is no longer available; remove the CRD from Chapter VII.

7

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations - DOE Directives...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations by Diane Johnson The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of...

8

Certification for DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 1 - DOE Directives, Delegation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

There is no history to display for this document. Certifies: DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations on Dec 03, 2014 There are no exemptions listed for this document....

9

Comment  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The article by Douglas Arent, Alison Wise, and Rachel Gelman provides an excellent overview on the rapid development of the renewable energy sector. The article focuses on trends in renewable energy markets, the status and prospects of renewable energy technology (RET), and policy frameworks for RETs. It is more reticent on the role of renewable energy for combating global warming. This acknowledges the fact that a full assessment of the potential contribution of \\{RETs\\} requires an integrated systems perspective, including consideration of the climate change mitigation requirement and the status and prospects of alternative mitigation options (Edenhofer et al., 2009, 2010; Clarke et al., 2009). This comment will briefly review the article's perspective on the trends and prospects of renewable energy, and then move on to a short discussion of some system-level considerations for assessing the role of renewable energy for combating global warming.

Elmar Kriegler

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Microsoft Word - o481.1c FinalAdminChg1 3-14-11  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81.1C Chg. 1 81.1C Chg. 1 03-14-11 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO DOE O 481.1C, WORK FOR OTHERS (NON-DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FUNDED WORK) LOCATION OF CHANGES: Page Paragraph Changed To 7 5.f(1) "intelligence and intelligence-related WFO projects and intelligence SAPs." "intelligence and intelligence- related work and intelligence SAPs." 7 5.f(2) "intelligence-related WFO projects" "intelligence and intelligence- related work" 7 5.f(3) "intelligence-related WFO projects" "intelligence and intelligence- related work" 7 5.f(4) "intelligence-related WFO" "intelligence and intelligence-

11

Microsoft Word - o420 1bChg1Final4-19-10  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

https://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 12-22-05 Review: 12-22-07 Chg. 1: 4-19-10 SUBJECT: FACILITY SAFETY 1. OBJECTIVES. To establish facility and programmatic safety requirements for Department of Energy (DOE), including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), for- a. nuclear and explosives safety design criteria, b. fire protection, c. criticality safety, d. natural phenomena hazards (NPH) mitigation, and e. the System Engineer Program. 2. CANCELLATION. This Order cancels DOE O 420.1A, Facility Safety, dated 05-20-02. Cancellation of an Order does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any contractual obligation to comply with such an Order. Contractor requirements documents (CRDs)

12

Microsoft Word - o580.1Chg1Final5-8-08.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Management U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 12-7-05 Chg 1: 5-8-08 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PERSONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1. OBJECTIVES. To set forth the following: a. Standards, practices, and performance expectations for the management of personal property owned by the Department of Energy (DOE). (Terms and definitions used in this Order can be referenced in the Guide, DOE G 580.1-1, Department of Energy Personal Property Management Guide, dated 12-7-05.) b. Responsibilities for development, administration, application, and oversight of the DOE personal property management program. 2. CANCELLATIONS. None. 3. APPLICABILITY. a. DOE Elements. This Order applies to all DOE elements with personal property

13

Microsoft Word - o144 1AdmChg1Clean11-9-09  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Intergovernmental and Tribal Affairs Intergovernmental and Tribal Affairs U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 1-16-09 Admin Chg 1: 11-6-09 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENT INTERACTIONS AND POLICY 1. PURPOSE. This Order communicates Departmental, programmatic, and field responsibilities for interacting with American Indian Governments and transmits the Department of Energy's (DOE) American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Government Policy (hereafter "Indian Policy") including its guiding principles, and transmits the Framework for Implementation of the Policy. 2. CANCELLATION. DOE O 1230.2, American Indian Tribal Government Policy, dated 4-8-92. Cancellation of a directive does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any

14

Customer Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Forum Energy Imbalance Market Meetings Customer Comments Generator Interconnection Reform Implementation Network Integration Transmission Service (NT Service) Network Open...

15

Customer Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Improvement (CBPI) Customer Forum Energy Imbalance Market Generator Interconnection Reform Implementation Meetings Customer Comments Network Integration Transmission Service (NT...

16

COMMENTS OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coordination of Federal ) Authorizations for Electric ) 10 CFR Part 900 Transmission Facilities ) (RIN 1901-AB18) COMMENTS OF THE STAFF OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE INTERIM FINAL RULE INTRODUCTION The Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ("CPUC") hereby provides its comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Interim Final Rule on Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities, which was published in the Federal Register on Friday, September 19, 2008. The CPUC is a constitutionally established agency charged with the responsibility for regulating electric corporations within the State of California. In

17

m028.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

270) 270) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 2 datablocks that follow this one. PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1275± 10 1275± 10 1275± 10 1275± 10 700 GAVILLET 78 HBC + 4.2 K - p → Ξ - (K π π) + PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1270± 10 1270± 10 1270±

18

m030.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

170) 170) I G (J PC ) = 0 - (1 + - ) h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1168± 4 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 1166± 5± 3 1 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 1190± 60 2 DANKOWY... 81 SPEC 0 8 π p → 3π n 1 Average and spread of values using 2 variants of the model of BOWLER 75. 2 Uses the model of BOWLER 75. h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 345± 6 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 375± 6± 34 3 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 320± 50 4 DANKOWY... 81 SPEC 0 8 π

19

m099.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 (1650) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry contains various peaks in strange meson systems (K + φ, K π π) reported in partial-wave analysis in the 1600-1900 mass re- gion. K 1 (1650) MASS K 1 (1650) MASS K 1 (1650) MASS K 1 (1650) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1650± 50 1650± 50 1650± 50 1650± 50 FRAME 86 OMEG + 13 K + p → φK + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 1840 ARMSTRONG 83 OMEG - 18.5 K - p → 3K p ∼ 1800 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p K 1 (1650) WIDTH K 1 (1650) WIDTH K 1 (1650) WIDTH K 1 (1650) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 150± 50 150± 50 150± 50 150± 50 FRAME 86 OMEG + 13 K + p → φK + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 250 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES Mode Γ 1 K π π Γ 2 K φ K 1

20

b131.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

370) 370) I (J P ) = 1 2 (? ? ) J, P need confirmation. Status: ∗∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Ξ (2370) MASS Ξ (2370) MASS Ξ (2370) MASS Ξ (2370) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE 2356± 10 JENKINS 83 MPS - K - p → K + MM 2370 50 HASSALL 81 HBC -0 K - p 6.5 GeV/c 2373± 8 94 AMIRZADEH 80 HBC -0 K - p 8.25 GeV/c 2392± 27 DIBIANCA 75 DBC Ξ 2π Ξ (2370) WIDTH Ξ (2370) WIDTH Ξ (2370) WIDTH Ξ (2370) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 80 50 HASSALL 81 HBC -0 K - p 6.5 GeV/c 80± 25 94 AMIRZADEH 80 HBC -0 K - p 8.25 GeV/c 75± 69 DIBIANCA 75 DBC Ξ 2π Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Mode Fraction (Γ i /Γ) Γ 1 Λ K π seen Includes Γ 4 + Γ 6 . Γ 2 Σ K π seen Includes Γ 5 + Γ 6 . Γ 3 Ω - K Γ 4 Λ K ∗ (892) Γ 5 Σ K ∗ (892) Γ 6 Σ (1385)K Ξ (2370) BRANCHING RATIOS

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

m028.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 K 1 (1270) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS NODE=M028205 NODE=M028MX VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 2 datablocks that follow this one. PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE NODE=M028M2 NODE=M028M2 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1275 ± 10 1275 ± 10 1275 ± 10 1275 ± 10 700 GAVILLET 78 HBC + 4.2 K - p → Ξ - (K π π) + PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS NODE=M028M3 NODE=M028M3 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block

22

m035.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 (2045) I (J P ) = 1 2 (4 + ) K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 2062± 14± 13 1 ASTON 86 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 2039± 10 400 2,3 CLELAND 82 SPEC ± 50 K + p → K 0 S π ± p 2070 + 100 - 40 4 ASTON 81C LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2079± 7 431 TORRES 86 MPSF 400 p A → 4K X 2088± 20 650 BAUBILLIER 82 HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 S π - p 2115± 46 488 CARMONY 77 HBC 0 9 K + d → K + π 's X 1 From a fit to all moments. 2 From a fit to 8 moments. 3 Number of events evaluated by us. 4 From energy-independent partial-wave analysis. K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 198± 30 OUR AVERAGE 198±

23

m030.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

30 30 h 1 (1170) I G (J PC ) = 0 - (1 + - ) h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS NODE=M030M NODE=M030M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1168 ± 4 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n OCCUR=2 1166 ± 5 ± 3 1 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 1190 ± 60 2 DANKOWY... 81 SPEC 0 8 π p → 3π n 1 Average and spread of values using 2 variants of the model of BOWLER 75. NODE=M030M;LINKAGE=B 2 Uses the model of BOWLER 75. NODE=M030M;LINKAGE=C h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH NODE=M030W NODE=M030W VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← * * * We do not use the following data for averages,

24

m033.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 ρ 5 (2350) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (5 - - ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry was previously called U 1 (2400). See also ρ(2150), NODE=M033 f 2 (2150), ρ 3 (2250), f 4 (2300). ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS NODE=M033205 NODE=M033M π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n NODE=M033M3 NODE=M033M3 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 2330 ± 35 2330 ± 35 2330 ± 35 2330 ± 35 ALDE 95 GAM2 38 π - p → ω π 0 n NODE=M033M1 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 2303 HASAN 94 RVUE p p → π π ∼ 2300 1 MARTIN 80B RVUE ∼ 2250 1 MARTIN 80C RVUE ∼ 2500 2 CARTER 78B CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → K - K + ∼ 2480 3 CARTER 77 CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → π π S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N NODE=M033M2 NODE=M033M2 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data

25

m033.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 (2350) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (5 - - ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry was previously called U 1 (2400). See also ρ(2150), f 2 (2150), ρ 3 (2250), f 4 (2300). ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 2330± 35 2330± 35 2330± 35 2330± 35 ALDE 95 GAM2 38 π - p → ω π 0 n VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 2303 HASAN 94 RVUE p p → π π ∼ 2300 1 MARTIN 80B RVUE ∼ 2250 1 MARTIN 80C RVUE ∼ 2500 2 CARTER 78B CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → K - K + ∼ 2480 3 CARTER 77 CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → π π S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2300± 45 4 ANISOVICH 02 SPEC 0.6-1.9 p p → ω π 0 , ω η π 0 , π + π - 2295±

26

Page comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

home/ home/ http://www.nersc.gov/users/computational-systems/hopper/updates-and-status/open-issues/resolved-error-message-modulecmd-switch-c-172-error-152-module-prgenv-cray-is-currently-not-loaded/#PageComment_97 > module list 2>&1 | grep Prg 32) PrgEnv-gnu/4.1.40 I ignore the error but It's a bit uncomfortable that the error takes screen the space here are my loaded modules: > module list Currently Loaded Modulefiles: 1) modules/3.2.6.6 2) xtpe-network-gemini 3) darshan/2.2.6 4) atp/1.6.2 5) switch/1.0-1.0401.36779.2.72.gem 6) shared-root/1.0-1.0401.37253.3.50.gem 7) pdsh/2.26-1.0401.37449.1.1.gem 8) nodehealth/5.0-1.0401.38460.12.18.gem 9) lbcd/2.1-1.0401.35360.1.2.gem 10) hosts/1.0-1.0401.35364.1.115.gem 11) configuration/1.0-1.0401.35391.1.2.gem 12) ccm/2.2.0-1.0401.37254.2.142 13)

27

Tribal Comments Database  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011.

28

Bulk Hauling Equipment for CHG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This presentation by Don Baldwin of Hexagon Composites was given at the DOE Hydrogen Compression, Storage, and Dispensing Workshop in March 2013.

29

DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations. The Department is interested in receiving comment on the...

30

Interested Parties- WAPA Public Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Comments Received in Response to Western Area Power Administration's Federal Register Notice Titled 'Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments.'

31

OSTIblog Recent comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

comments/rss en Good to know comments/rss en Good to know http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/mixing-sciencegov-coffee-and-laptop#comment-1222 I didn't know that kind of information is available on science.gov! This would be really helpful for my Dad who is now in his 70s and is always prescribed different drugs for common aging ailments. Thanks, Cathey! Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:20:57 +0000 comment 1222 at http://www.osti.gov/home The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/manhattan-project-its-immediate-influences#comment-1136 "The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences" and the Wikipedia article about the Manhattan Project do have something very specific in common. Please note that one of the Wikipedia 'References', under 'General,

32

DOE Hydrogen Transition Analysis Workshop Discussion Comments...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Workshop Discussion Comments, Questions, and Action Items DOE Hydrogen Transition Analysis Workshop Discussion Comments, Questions, and Action Items Discussion comments, questions,...

33

Appendix C - Comments and Responses  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

C C COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This appendix contains the comments that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the draft EA (March 22 through April 22, 2002) and their responses. Comments were obtained during the public meeting held in Carlsbad, New Mexico, on April 16, 2002, as well as from letters and electronic mail messages. The comment entries are organized according to comment categories. In compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and Council on Environmental Quality regulations, public comments on the draft EA were assessed individually and collectively. Some comments resulted in changes or modifications that have been incorporated into the final EA. Comments not requiring modifications to the EA resulted in a response to correct the

34

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

35

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

extension of public comment period for reply comments. extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

36

SRREN Comment and Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation Introduction: As part of the Final Government Distribution of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN), the U.S. Government is conducting a review of the Summary for Policymakers for the report. This web site is posted on the internet for the sole purpose of facilitating the U.S. Government review at this time. The U.S. Government provided comments previously as part of the Government and Expert Review hosted on this web site. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research

37

EIA-930 Comments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

30 Comments 30 Comments Tim Hattaway PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Page 1 PowerSouth Energy Cooperative appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Form EIA-930 report, ''Balancing Authority Operations Report''. We have several concerns with the proposed data collection effort. Some concerns PowerSouth has with the proposal are:  The DOE is seeking hourly information within minutes of the time that it becomes available to the BA in very raw form. Many times, we will not have the data available by 10-minutes after an hour due to meter error, communication glitches, etc. Providing the data in such a way will lead to many errors and gaps with the data being provided.  For a smaller sized BA such as PowerSouth, we are concerned by amount of work that will be

38

Draft WAPA Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Interwest Energy Alliance ● The Wilderness Society ● Western Grid Group Group Comments on Western Area Power Administration's Renewable Energy Transmission Program April 1, 2009 I. Introduction On behalf of Western Resource Advocates, Natural Resources Defense Council, Interwest Energy Alliance, The Wilderness Society and Western Grid Group, please accept the following comments in response to Western Area Power Administration's ("Western") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments regarding the implementation of Section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 74 Fed. Reg. 9391-9393 (Mar. 4, 2009). The 2009 Recovery Act specifically provides $3.25 billion in new borrowing authority for

39

EA and SOWP Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

EA and SOWP Comments EA and SOWP Comments This document covers Knight Piisold's technical comments to the Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (EA) and the Shiprock Site Observational Work Plan (SOWP). The major areas of concern include the following: 1. The contaminant sources on site may not be properly defined. In particular, the disposal cell and the residual vadose zone soil contamination need to be redefined in the conceptual model and the transport model. 2. The documents contain no compliance plan, making it difficult to ascertain if regulatory guidelines are being met. 3. The results of the risk assessment are not linked to the establishment of the remedial goals 4. The current design of the evaporation pond may pose environmental risks due to their

40

b095.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 Z 0 (1780) 1/2 + I (J P ) = 0( 1 2 + ) Status: ∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE WILSON 72, GIACOMELLI 74, and NAKAJIMA 82B find some so- NODE=B095 lutions with resonant-like behavior in the P 01 partial wave. The effect seen in the isospin-0 total cross section, if a resonance, must have spin 1/2, because the inelastic cross section is very small and the total cross section is about 4π/k 2 . Z 0 (1780) MASS Z 0 (1780) MASS Z 0 (1780) MASS Z 0 (1780) MASS NODE=B095M NODE=B095M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1778 NAKAJIMA 82B PWA K N 0.2-1.6 GeV/c 1740 GIACOMELLI 74 PWA 0 0.38-1.51 GeV/c 1750 1 CARROLL 73B CNTR Isospin-0 σ total fit 1 OCCUR=2 1825 1 CARROLL 73B CNTR K N I = 0 total σ (fit 2) 1800 2 WILSON 72 PWA K + N P 01 wave 1780 ± 10 COOL 70B CNTR + K + p, K + d to- tal σ seen 3 DOWELL 70 CNTR K + p, d total Z 0 (1780) WIDTH Z 0 (1780) WIDTH Z 0 (1780) WIDTH Z 0 (1780) WIDTH NODE=B095W NODE=B095W VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

RICAP-07: Summary comments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Roma International Conference on Astroparticle Physics covered gamma-ray astronomy, air shower experiments and neutrino astronomy on three successive days. I organize my brief summary comments into four topics that cut across these three techniques. They are detector calibration, galactic sources, extra-galactic sources and cosmology.

Thomas K. Gaisser

2008-01-29T23:59:59.000Z

42

SPPR Project Customer Comments Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The following entities have provided comments on the SPPR Project as proposed by Western in the October 6, 2010 customer meeting. Colorado River Commission of Nevada...

43

Post-2011 Phase 2 Public Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

September 22, 2014 BPA EE Post-2011 Review Response to Public Comment 1 BPA Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review Response to Public Comment The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)...

44

Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Bonneville Power Administration Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration BPA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments and information and submits the following...

45

Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC on Implementing the National...

46

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company...

47

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents &...

48

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Comments from PNM Resources, sent October 29, 2013 Comments from the Arizona Game and Fish Department, sent October 29, 2013 Comments from Minnesota Power, sent October 30, 2013...

49

Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company BGE comments to DOE addressing policy and logistical challenges Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric...

50

CA IOUs Comment Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2012 June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers.

51

Comments April 11.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tom or Julie Laub Tom or Julie Laub Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:09 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge I'm sure you've heard this before but as for employee's of National Laboratories the total benefits package should not be limited to 5% above "market average." You do not want average employees at a National Laboratory--you want the best and the brightest. Don't count on a sense of national pride to keep the exceptional employee at a National Laboratory. It is hard to have national pride when your nation does not appreciate your hard work and special talents. You can make more money some place other than a National Lab so the benefits have to be the way appreciation is shown. Benefits at National Labs have been in decline

52

web_comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rec Type Rec Type Recommendations/ Comments Name Organization 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Future reliability standards must strike a balance between detailed, rigid requirements, which provide little or no latitude for deviation, and standards, which are objective-based and allow for innovation and invention to achieve intended goals. Each standard should identify its importance on the BPS reliability in terms of the potential short-term (operating time horizon) vs. long-term (planning time horizon) impacts of non-compliance. Ajay Garg, Mike Penstone Hydro One Networks Inc. 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Core Reliability Standards: comprising a small number of technical standards designed to enable the BPS to withstand and recover from unexpected contingencies. Core Reliability

53

Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Below are links to information about how to comment on DOE NEPA projects with open comment periods, including comment periods on the proposed scope of planned NEPA documents and on draft NEPA documents (e.g., draft environmental assessments and draft environmental impacts statements). The end of each comment period is indicated below. EIS-0496: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California Scoping: Comment Period Ends 01/21/14 DOE's Western Area Power Administration, with the Bureau of Reclamation as a cooperating agency, is preparing a joint EIS and environmental impact report (under the California Environmental Quality Act) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed interconnection of certain

54

Comments on Backreaction and Cosmic Acceleration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper "On Acceleration Without Dark Energy".

E. W. Kolb; S. Matarrese; A. Riotto

2005-11-02T23:59:59.000Z

55

Comments on backreaction and cosmic acceleration  

SciTech Connect

In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper ''On Acceleration Without Dark Energy''.

Kolb, Edward W.; /Fermilab /Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr. /Chicago U., EFI; Matarrese, Sabinio; /Padua U. /INFN, Padua; Riotto, Antonion; /CERN

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

Zero Zone Comment | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Order 13563 certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment...

57

Department of Energy Considers Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Considers Comments on Buried Waste Cleanup The U.S. Department of Energy is evaluating the input it received from the public during the recent public comment period on a proposed plan to cleanup buried waste at DOE's Idaho Site. "The Agencies are evaluating the input we received from the public," said Mark Arenaz, (WAG 7 Federal Project Director). "We appreciate those people and organizations who took the time to study the proposed plan and give us input. We got some very good suggestions that we will consider carefully." A total of 227 formal comments were received by DOE regarding the Proposed Plan for the Radioactive Waste Management Complex Operable Unit 7-13/14. The Proposed Plan presented five (5) alternatives to address waste remediation in the Subsurface Disposal Area, ranging from

58

Microsoft Word - S07803_Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

LMS/MNT/S07803 LMS/MNT/S07803 DOE Responses to April 13, 2011 BTAG Technical Review Comments on Monticello Mill Tailings Site, Operable Unit III, Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011 May 2011 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DOE Responses to BTAG Technical Review Comments May 2011 Doc. No. S07803 Page 1 Preface The following documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Legacy Management (LM) responses to joint comments received from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) on the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) Operable Unit (OU) III Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011. EPA, UDEQ, and FWS

59

Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan Stakeholder Comment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan Volume III Stakeholder Comment Prepared for State of Hawaii Department of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology December 2009 #12;i Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan Volume III Stakeholder Comment Comments on the Draft Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan were solicited by posting the document

60

Comments on "Microscale flow visualization"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We make comments on the presentation of Sinton's paper (Microfluidics and Nanofluidics {\\bf 1}: 2, 2004) about the microscale flow visualization since the effects of the roughness along the microfabricated wall upon the current macroflow visualization methods could be significant and cannot be neglected in microdomain and even nanodomain.

A. Kwang-Hua Chu

2005-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance- Draft for Public Comment & Comment Submission Form (September 2014)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On September 12, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of the Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance for public comment. The draft Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance and comment submission form are available.

62

Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Any person wishing to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on the main Natural Gas Regulations page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the following methods. Please be sure to include Docket No. and Application Name with your filing: E-mail: fergas@hq.doe.gov (you must include FE Docket No. in the Subject line of the email) Regular Mail: (should include an original and three paper copies of

63

Comments of ATT&T Inc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ATT&T Inc Comments of ATT&T Inc AT&T Inc comments on the Department of Energy's third Request for Information (RFI) on Smart Grid issues. Comments of ATT&T Inc More Documents &...

64

Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI...

65

Comment on Creating Metastable Schrdinger Cat States  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by J. J. Slosser and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 418 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Mauro Fortunato

1996-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

66

Comment on Polarons in Carbon Nanotubes  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by M. Verissimo-Alves et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3372 (2001). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

E. Piegari; V. Cataudella; V. Marigliano Ramaglia; G. Iadonisi

2002-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

67

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016...

68

Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The ORSSAB Recommendations and Comments on the Draft 2010 Remediation Effectiveness Report for the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation.

69

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting...

70

Draft Voluntary Code of Conduct Available for Public Comment...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

comment on DOE's draft Voluntary Code of Conduct which addresses data privacy surrounding smart grid technologies. Comments must be received on or before October 14, 2014. In...

71

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges...

72

Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges...

73

Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Ingersoll Rand Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Ingersoll...

74

EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Extend Public Comment Period EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Department of Energy and the Bureau of...

75

Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by...

76

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping. Antony's College Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

77

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Gardens Banbury Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

78

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Botley Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

79

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Westminster way Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

80

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping: Worcester College Walton Street Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance

Flynn, E. Victor

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Banbury Road Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

82

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping College Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

83

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Margaret's Road Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

84

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping: 13 St Bernards Rd Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer

Flynn, E. Victor

85

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping College St Giles Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

86

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Road OXFORD Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

87

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Parade Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

88

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Close Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

89

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Road Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

90

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio...

91

Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology...

92

Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and Complaint Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and...

93

Enhanced Geothermal Systems Documents for Public Comment - Now...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enhanced Geothermal Systems Documents for Public Comment - Now Closed Enhanced Geothermal Systems Documents for Public Comment - Now Closed February 28, 2012 - 3:41pm Addthis ****...

94

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension Proposed Infrastructure Improvements for the Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada DOE is extending the public comment period for the Yucca...

95

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM...

96

DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Radioactive Waste DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste 1. Summary Comments on Draft Branch Technical Position on a Performance Assessment Methodology for Low-Level Radioactive...

97

Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

U.S. Department of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue...

98

EA-1919: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Public Comment Period Extension EA-1919: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension Recycling of Scrap Metals Originating from Radiological Areas DOE has extended the public...

99

City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:...

100

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Microsoft Word - atni bpa contract template comments 071408.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in contract discussions. We have designed these comments with existing tribal utilities and potential new tribal utilities in mind. We support many of the comments of...

102

NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Burden RFI NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments...

103

NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reducing Regulatory Burden NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments...

104

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental...

105

Public invited to comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

invited to comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials NOTICE: DOE has extended the public comment period...

106

Support for City of Alexandria's Comments on the District of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EL05-145-000 Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Comments on Department of...

107

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Volume 2: Comment and Response Document: Chapter 2: Comment Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS 2 COMMENT DOCUMENTS This section provides copies of the actual letters or other documents containing public comments on the draft EISs that were submitted to DOE, including comments extracted from the transcripts of the public hearings. Table 2.1 contains an index of the comment documents by document number. Table 2.2 provides an index of comment documents by the commentors last name. Table 2.3 contains an index of comment documents by company or organization. Individual comments are denoted with vertical lines in the right margin. TABLE 2.1 Index of Commentors by Document Number Document Number Name Company/Organization Page D0001 Driver, Charles M. Individual 2-5 D0002 Kilrod, John Individual 2-7 D0003 Colley, Vina Portsmouth/Piketon Residents for Environmental Safety and Security

108

m015.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 ρ 3 (1690) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (3 - - ) ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS NODE=M015205 NODE=M015M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 5 datablocks that follow this one. 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE NODE=M015M1 NODE=M015M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1677 ± 14 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → 2π p 1679 ± 11 476 BALTAY 78B HBC 0 15 π + p → π + π - n 1678 ± 12 175 1 ANTIPOV 77 CIBS 0 25 π - p → p 3π 1690 ± 7 600 1 ENGLER 74 DBC 0 6 π + n → π + π - p 1693 ± 8 2 GRAYER 74 ASPK 0 17 π - p → π + π - n 1678 ± 12 MATTHEWS 71C DBC 0 7 π + N * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits,

109

b051.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 Σ (1670) Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Formation experiments are listed separately in the preceding entry. NODE=B051 Probably there are two states at the same mass with the same quan- tum numbers, one decaying to Σ π and Λ π, the other to Λ(1405) π. See the note in front of the preceding entry. Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS NODE=B051M (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) NODE=B051M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← 1670 ± 4 1 CARROLL 76 DPWA Isospin-1 total σ 1675 ± 10 2 HEPP 76 DBC - K - N 1.6-1.75 GeV/c 1665 ± 1 APSELL 74 HBC K - p 2.87 GeV/c 1688 ± 2 or 1683 ± 5 1.2k BERTHON 74 HBC 0 Quasi-2-body σ 1670 ± 6 AGUILAR-... 70B HBC K - p → Σ π π 4 GeV OCCUR=2 1668 ±

110

b078.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Production Production Experiments I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Formation experiments are listed separately in the previous entry. The results of CRENNELL 69B at 3.9 GeV/c are not confirmed by SABRE 70 at 3.0 GeV/c. However, at 4.5 GeV/c, AMMANN 70 sees a peak at 1642 MeV which on the basis of branching ratios they do not associate with the Σ (1670). See MILLER 70 for a review of these conflicts. Σ (1620) MASS Σ (1620) MASS Σ (1620) MASS Σ (1620) MASS (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE 1642± 12 AMMANN 70 DBC K - N 4.5 GeV/c 1618± 3 20 BLUMENFELD 69 HBC + K 0 L p 1619± 8 CRENNELL 69B DBC ± K - N → Λ π π π * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1616± 8 CRENNELL

111

b050.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 Ξ (1820) 3/2 - I (J P ) = 1 2 ( 3 2 - ) Status: ∗∗∗ The clearest evidence is an 8-standard-deviation peak in Λ K - seen NODE=B050 by GAY 76C. TEODORO 78 favors J = 3/2, but cannot make a parity discrimination. BIAGI 87C is consistent with J = 3/2 and favors negative parity for this J value. Ξ (1820) MASS Ξ (1820) MASS Ξ (1820) MASS Ξ (1820) MASS NODE=B050M We only average the measurements that appear to us to be most significant NODE=B050M and best determined. NODE=B050M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1819.4 ± 3.1 ± 2.0 280 1 BIAGI 87 SPEC 0 Ξ - Be → (Λ K - ) X 1826 ± 3 ± 1 54 BIAGI 87C SPEC 0 Ξ - Be → (Λ K 0 ) X 1822 ± 6 JENKINS 83 MPS - K - p → K + (MM) 1830 ± 6 300 BIAGI 81 SPEC - SPS hyperon

112

b068.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

030) 030) I (J P ) = 1 2 ( ≥ 5 2 ? ) Status: ∗∗∗ The evidence for this state has been much improved by HEMING- WAY 77, who see an eight standard deviation enhancement in Σ K and a weaker coupling to Λ K . ALITTI 68 and HEMINGWAY 77 observe no signals in the Ξ π π (or Ξ (1530) π) channel, in contrast to DIBIANCA 75. The decay (Λ/Σ )K π reported by BARTSCH 69 is also not confirmed by HEMINGWAY 77. A moments analysis of the HEMINGWAY 77 data indicates at a level of three standard deviations that J ≥ 5/2. Ξ (2030) MASS Ξ (2030) MASS Ξ (2030) MASS Ξ (2030) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below. 2022 ± 7 JENKINS 83 MPS - K - p → K + MM 2024 ± 2 200 HEMINGWAY

113

m040.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

40 40 K 2 (2250) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 - ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry contains various peaks in strange meson systems reported NODE=M040 in the 2150-2260 MeV region, as well as enhancements seen in the antihyperon-nucleon system, either in the mass spectra or in the J P = 2 - wave. K 2 (2250) MASS K 2 (2250) MASS K 2 (2250) MASS K 2 (2250) MASS NODE=M040M NODE=M040M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2200 ± 40 1 ARMSTRONG 83C OMEG - 18 K - p → Λ p X 2235 ± 50 1 BAUBILLIER 81 HBC - 8 K - p → Λ p X 2260 ± 20 1 CLELAND 81 SPEC ± 50 K + p → Λ p X * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2280 ± 20 TIKHOMIROV 03 SPEC 40.0 π - C → K 0 S K 0 S K 0 L X 2147 ± 4 37 CHLIAPNIK... 79 HBC + 32 K + p → Λ p X 2240 ± 20 20 LISSAUER 70 HBC 9 K + p 1 J P = 2 - from moments analysis. NODE=M040M;LINKAGE=Q K 2 (2250) WIDTH K 2 (2250)

114

m134.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 K ∗ 0 (1950) I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 + ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Seen in partial-wave analysis of the K - π + system. Needs confir- NODE=M134 mation. K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS NODE=M134M NODE=M134M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1 ASTON 88 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1917 ± 12 2 ZHOU 06 RVUE K p → K - π + n 1820 ± 40 3 ANISOVICH 97C RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n 1 We take the central value of the two solutions and the larger error given. NODE=M134M;LINKAGE=A 2 S-matrix pole. Using ASTON 88 and assuming K ∗ 0 (800), K ∗ 0 (1430). NODE=M134M;LINKAGE=ZU 3 T-matrix pole. Reanalysis of ASTON 88 data. NODE=M134M;LINKAGE=A1 K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH NODE=M134W NODE=M134W VALUE (MeV)

115

b051.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Bumps Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Formation experiments are listed separately in the preceding entry. Probably there are two states at the same mass with the same quan- tum numbers, one decaying to Σ π and Λ π, the other to Λ(1405) π. See the note in front of the preceding entry. Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE 1670± 4 1 CARROLL 76 DPWA Isospin-1 total σ 1675± 10 2 HEPP 76 DBC - K - N 1.6-1.75 GeV/c 1665± 1 APSELL 74 HBC K - p 2.87 GeV/c 1688± 2 or 1683 ± 5 1.2k BERTHON 74 HBC 0 Quasi-2-body σ 1670± 6 AGUILAR-... 70B HBC K - p → Σ π π 4 GeV 1668± 10 AGUILAR-... 70B HBC K - p → Σ 3π 4 GeV 1660± 10 ALVAREZ 63 HBC + K - p 1.51

116

m015.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

690) 690) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (3 - - ) ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 5 datablocks that follow this one. 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1677± 14 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → 2π p 1679± 11 476 BALTAY 78B HBC 0 15 π + p → π + π - n 1678± 12 175 1 ANTIPOV 77 CIBS 0 25 π - p → p 3π 1690± 7 600 1 ENGLER 74 DBC 0 6 π + n → π + π - p 1693± 8 2 GRAYER 74 ASPK 0 17 π - p → π + π - n 1678± 12 MATTHEWS 71C DBC 0 7 π + N * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1734± 10 3 CORDEN 79 OMEG 12-15 π - p → n 2π 1692±

117

b058.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

90) 90) Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) Status: ∗∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE See the note preceding the Σ (1670) Listings. Seen in production experiments only, mainly in Λ π. Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE 1698± 20 70 1 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c 1707± 20 40 2 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c 1698± 20 15 ADERHOLZ 69 HBC + π + p 8 GeV/c 1682± 2 46 BLUMENFELD 69 HBC + K 0 L p 1700± 20 MOTT 69 HBC + K - p 5.5 GeV/c 1694± 24 60 3 PRIMER 68 HBC + K - p 4.6-5 GeV/c 1700± 6 4 SIMS 68 HBC - K - N → Λ π π 1715± 12 30 COLLEY 67 HBC + K - p 6 GeV/c Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION

118

b058.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Σ (1690) Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) Status: ∗∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE See the note preceding the Σ (1670) Listings. Seen in production NODE=B058 experiments only, mainly in Λ π. Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS NODE=B058M (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) NODE=B058M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← 1698 ± 20 70 1 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c OCCUR=2 1707 ± 20 40 2 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c 1698 ± 20 15 ADERHOLZ 69 HBC + π + p 8 GeV/c 1682 ± 2 46 BLUMENFELD 69 HBC + K 0 L p 1700 ± 20 MOTT 69 HBC + K - p 5.5 GeV/c 1694 ± 24 60 3 PRIMER 68 HBC + K - p 4.6-5 GeV/c 1700 ± 6 4 SIMS 68 HBC - K - N → Λ π π 1715 ± 12 30 COLLEY 67 HBC + K - p 6 GeV/c Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690)

119

Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE requested comments on what publicly-available data and information should be considered, and what types of analysis should be performed to identify and understand the significance and character of transmission congestion. The following public comments were received as of March 30, 2012, in response to the 2012 study. DOE appreciates the comments that various individuals and organizations submitted. Comments were received from these organizations, listed alphabetically.

120

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES/OBJECTIVES OF BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? WHY IS BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? Because of the criticality of the work being conducted under its contracts and the increasing pressure being put on its budgets, the Department needs to ensure that work under its contracts: * Is appropriate, appropriately documented and performance-based; * Does not violate restrictions or constraints on the use of Department of Energy (DOE)-controlled facilities; * Complies with appropriate DOE directives; * That voluntary consensus standards are used in preference to Government unique standards; * Is carried out in a manner that protects the workers, public and the environment against hazards; * Is properly authorized; and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of of North Dakota Public Service Commissioner Susan Wefald U.S. Department of Energy Transmission Congestion Study Workshop June 18, 2008 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma I am very pleased to have this chance to share thoughts with the U.S. Department of Energy at this Transmission Congestion Study Workshop. I would like to thank the Department for arranging this meeting to provide input on the 2009 study on Electric Transmission Congestion. In this talk, my thoughts represent those of the North Dakota Public Service Commission. As requested, I will be discussing changes in the North Dakota area since 2005 that affect the location, duration, frequency, magnitude, and significance of transmission congestion, including related constraints. In 2005 North Dakota had an export limit around its south and east borders (commonly referred to as NDEX) of about 1,950 MW, which if exceeded can cause

122

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

B-1 B-1 APPENDIX B RELATED INTERNET WEB SITES WHERE CAN I ACCESS ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REFERENCES LISTED IN THIS REFERENCE BOOK? http://www.cfo.doe.gov/policy/actindex/index.html-ssi DOE Accounting Handbook http://www.pr.doe.gov/acqguide.html DOE Acquisition Guide http://www.pr.doe.gov//acqltr.html DOE Acquisition Letters http://www.pr.doe.gov/dear.html DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) http://www.cfo.doe.gov/progliaison/bmop/index.htm DOE Business Management Oversight Process Web Page http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/ DOE Chief Financial Officer Budget Related Information (DOE Budget Call, Budget Formulation Handbook, Principles of Appropriation Law, etc.) http://home.doe.gov/news/releases99/junpr/pr99163.htm DOE Deputy Secretary's Memorandum, of June 25, 1999, on Project Management

123

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and services are transported cost effectively and in a manner which protects property, individuals and the environment. This chapter details the roles and responsibilities of the members of the contract administration team in the transportation, personal property and real property management areas. It also provides

124

COMMENTS  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

procedures, and practices as prescribed in the FPMR and DOE- PMR.; * Planning and scheduling of personal property requirements to ensure that supplies and equipment are...

125

COMMENT  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

CHEMISTRY IN EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTH CARE ... WITH ALL THE RECENT FLAP regarding product liability and corporate integrity, it is no surprise that hospitals in the U.S. can be dangerous places for patients. ...

KENNETH E. BLICK

2003-02-17T23:59:59.000Z

126

COMMENTS OF TENDRIL NETWORKS, INC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy July 12, 2010 Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." We agree with the observation presented in this RFI that access and privacy are complementary goods. We believe that the success of the smart grid will be measured by the degree to which consumers are engaged. In order to become engaged, consumers must have access to the information about real-time conditions, historical usage and underlying prices of energy markets.

127

Toshiba RFI Comments.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Definition and Scope Definition and Scope Answer/Comment 1 What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's definition? The following points are not referencedd in EISA 1301. ・Power provider should also control the output fluctuation of renewable resources. ・The end user should have the choice of which form of power storage to be used. Certain types of energy conservation and storage could work better in different applications (e.g. not only electricity power but also stored thermal energy which is more efficient for some purpose.) 2 If the definition is overly broad, what policy risks emerge as a result? In that case, the budget will be much greater in scale. Certain smart grid investments may not be as cost effective and could get lost in the overall

128

Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planned Transmission Outages Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant...

129

Notices III. Summary of Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 Federal Register 32 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2012 / Notices III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to Comments During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments in response to the September 26, 2012 Federal Register notice announcing the Agency's receipt of the requests for voluntary cancellation and termination of all uses of products listed in Table 1 of Unit II. IV. Cancellation Order Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f), EPA hereby approves the requested cancellation and termination of all uses of halofenozide registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the product registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. are canceled and all uses of halofenozide are terminated. The

130

Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A 74BPrivate Citizen/Individual's Written Comments Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | 1 While anecdotal suggestions of health effects from wind turbine sound can be found online, No evidence exists regarding direct negative health effects associated with wind turbine sound in any peer reviewed, scientific papers or studies. Impacts to birds and bats are disclosed in Section 4.4.5.11-Migratory Birds - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative and 4.4.5.8-Bats - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative, respectively. Impacts to Birds and Bats will be minimized by MM-BIO-5 Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy. Additionally, refer to Appendix B-4: Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy (formerly known as the Avian and Bat

131

Microsoft Word - UTC Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ADDRESSING POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES TO SMART GRID IMPLEMENTATION ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UTILITIES TELECOM COUNCIL The Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC") is pleased to provide the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. 1 While the RFI raises many important issues for the future development of the Smart Grid, UTC devotes its comments to one issue which Federal policy makers can play a uniquely important role: access to spectrum. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs

132

Microsoft Word - vol3-comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

i i VOLUME 3 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODOLOGY 1 3. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COMMENTERS 2 4. COMMENTS AND DOE RESPONSES 6 This page intentionally left blank. 1 1. INTRODUCTION The Draft EIS for the Kemper County IGCC Project was published in November 2009. DOE distributed copies of the Draft EIS to officials, agencies, Native American tribes, organizations, libraries, and members of the public identified in the distribution list (Chapter 12 of Draft EIS, Volume 1). DOE announced the notice of avail- ability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57297); and EPA published the notice of availability in the Federal Register on November 6, 2009 (74 FR 57466). This Volume 3 provides a

133

Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register...

134

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 79 Fed. Reg. 37963 (July 3, 2014).

135

Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Alerts Comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alerts Comments If you have a question about Energy Citations Database Alerts, we recommend you check frequently asked questions. If your question still has not been answered or if...

136

EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

403: Public Comment Period Extension 403: Public Comment Period Extension EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced a two-week extension of the public comment period for the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Solar PEIS), a joint effort with the Department of Energy. The agencies had previously provided for a 120-day public comment period on the Draft Solar PEIS. Because of numerous requests, the agencies extended the comment period by an additional two weeks beyond April 16, 2011. The comment period ran (with extension) until May 2, 2011. EIS-0403-DEIS_Second_Comment_Extension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period

137

AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Attachment to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments More Documents &...

138

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and American Public Power Association file these brief reply comments in support of the comments and reply comments filed by the Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC"). Both organizations strongly believe that the Administration should ensure that adequate spectrum is available for internal, utility networks. Integrating Smart Grid technologies into Cooperative and Public Power Systems will necessitate enhanced communications networks. In some instances, Cooperatives and Public Power Systems may choose a commercial provider for at least some portion of their communication network service

139

Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. ("Entergy"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, regarding the current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities. Entergy commented on similar issues in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") during the FCC's development of the National Broadband Plan. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc.

140

DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is now interested in receiving comment on the suggestions and comments received from outside parties. Those comments and suggestions are posted on the Office of the General Counsel website: Retrospective Review of Regulations. On January 31, 2011, the Department took two steps to launch its

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Comments of the American Public Gas Association on the Smart...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the American Public Gas Association on the Smart Grid RFI Comments of the American Public Gas Association on the Smart Grid RFI Comments from The American Public Gas Association on...

142

The Hanford Advisory Board (HAB or Board) welcomes public comment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Advisory Board (HAB or Board) welcomes public comment on cleanup of the Hanford Site. Those wishing to make public comment during the meeting should sign in and notify the...

143

COMMENTS OF THE WESTERN PUBLIC AGENCIES GROUP IN RESPONSE TO...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Scope of Comments These comments are submitted on behalf of each of the utilities of the Western Public Agencies Group ("WP AG") in response to a letter of Mark...

144

Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE' s July 27, 2010 Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comment (Notice) regarding implementation of Section 934 of the Energy Independence and...

145

The EIS Comment-Response Process (October 2004)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THE EIS THE EIS COMMENT-RESPONSE PROCESS October 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Environment, Safety and Health Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance The EIS Comment-Response Process Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Comment-Response Process...................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose of this Guidance ...............................................................................................2 1.3 Terms Used in this Guidance .........................................................................................3 2.0 General Principles for the Comment-Response Process .........................................................5

146

Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

U.S. Department of Energy Loan Programs Office: Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments

147

Comment on "Efficiency of Isothermal Molecular Machines at Maximum Power"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comment on "Efficiency of Isothermal Molecular Machines at Maximum Power" (PRL 108, 210602 (2012), arXiv:1201.6396)

Yunxin Zhang

2012-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

148

Comment on Level Statistics of Quantum Dots Coupled to Reservoirs  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by Jrgen Knig, Yuval Gefen, and Gerd Schn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4468 (1998).

M. Pascaud and G. Montambaux

1999-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

149

Comment on "Dynamics of Weak First Order Phase Transitions"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We comment on an earlier paper of M. Gleiser, regarding mechanisms of first-order phase transitions.

G. Harris; G. Jungman

1995-11-08T23:59:59.000Z

150

Comment on ''Observation of Superluminal Behaviors in Wave Propagation''  

SciTech Connect

Two Comments on the Letter by D. Mugnai, A. Ranfagni, and R. Ruggeri, Phys.Rev.Lett.84, 4830 (2000).

Ringermacher, Harry; Mead, Lawrence R.

2001-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

151

90915DOE 2010 Plan Comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 A B C D E F G H 9/15/2009 DOE URTAC: 2010 DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN COMMENTS (with assigned topic areas) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (& POLICY) TECHNOLO GY TRANSFER 2007, 2008, 2009 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMEN T METRICS & BENEFITS ASSESSMEN T 2010 PROGRAM Environment al and Prior Recommend ation Review ADMIN & EDITORIAL COMMENTS 2007 X X X 2008 X X 2009 X X X 2010 X X X X X X COMMENTS FROM DON SPARKS: The following areas are of importance: Unconventional Resource X 1. Resource Assessment X a. Resource assessment (p. 28) X b. Geosciences (p. 28) X c. Basin Analysis & Resource Exploitation (p. 29) X 2. Early Stage Research or novel concepts.... (p. 30) X 3. Develop and execute innovative approaches .......(p. 30) X Drilling/completion/water management

152

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Iffley Road Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects will have on the quality of life of residents and Worcester students. I think the public comment of April 30

Flynn, E. Victor

153

Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm Incorporated Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the Federal Communications Commission's National Broadband Plan ("NBP") that focus on how broadband communications systems can achieve the critically important U.S. goals of energy independence and enhanced energy efficiency. See FCC NBP at 247. In this regard, Qualcomm explains how commercial

154

Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report. Final: Comments and Responses to Comments  

SciTech Connect

This document is the Comments and Responses to Comments volume of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project (Final EIS/EIR). This volume of the Final EIS/EIR provides copies of the written comments received on the Draft EIS/EIR and the leady agency responses to those comments in conformance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

None

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative is a generation and transmission cooperative (G&T) that provides the wholesale electrical requirements and other services for 25 electric distribution cooperatives and 16 municipal utilities in the Upper Midwest. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More Documents & Publications AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For Information (RFI): Addressing Policy & Logistical Challenges.

156

Comment on ``Phase Coexistence in Multifragmentation''  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This comment on Moretto et al.PRL 76:372,1996 argues that the IMF-charge distribution may not be useful as signal for phase-transitions in nuclear multifragmentation. Fluctuations of different origin may corrupt this signal. Energy conservation is as important as charge conservation. The caloric equation of state is more safe.

D. H. E. Gross; A. S. Botvina

1996-07-18T23:59:59.000Z

157

Critical in PROJECT TITLE COMMENTS BPA NPCC  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PROJECT NUMBER (BiOp Critical in Italics) PROJECT TITLE COMMENTS BPA NPCC 35019 Develop and Implement a Pilot Status and Trend Monitoring Program BPA reduced budget by $250,000 to reflect duplicate NPCC tier 2. NPCC budget reflects an assumption of a capital determination for some components; BPA has

158

Comment on ``Discrete Boltzmann Equation for Microfluidics''  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comment on ``Discrete Boltzmann Equation for Microfluidics'' In a recent Letter [1], Li and Kwok use a lattice Boltzmann equation (LBE) for microfluidics. Their main claim is that an LBE model for microfluidics can be constructed based on the ``Bhatnagar-Gross-Kooky [sic]'' model by including ``the

Luo, Li-Shi

159

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Docket No. EO-05-01: In accordance with Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the Department of Energy on February 17, 2006. Potomac Electric Power Company and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. jointly submit these comments and answer to the requests for rehearing submitted by the City of Alexandria, Virginia and the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality in the captioned proceeding . Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public

160

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the Request for Information (Request or RFI) on smart grid policy and logistical challenges, published by the Department of Energy (DOE) on September 16, 2010 AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More Documents & Publications Comments on Smart Grid data access Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The documents are the Electricity Distribution System Workshop Discussion Summary and the Electricity Transmission System Workshop Discussion Summary. Written comments are to be received no later than March 25, 2013. For details on how to submit comments, please view the Federal Register Notice, below. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

162

American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company LLC, by its corporate manager, ATC Management Inc. (collectively "ATCLLC") is pleased to have the opportunity to provide the following comments on the additional matters to be considered by DOE in connection with the Rules. Interim Final Rule Comments, RIN 1901-AB18 Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities More Documents & Publications Comments of the Staff of the public utilities commission of the state of California on the interim final rule Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities

163

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The documents are the Electricity Distribution System Workshop Discussion Summary and the Electricity Transmission System Workshop Discussion Summary. Written comments are to be received no later than March 25, 2013. For details on how to submit comments, please view the Federal Register Notice, below. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

164

The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS. The EIS Comment-Response Process More Documents & Publications EIS Distribution Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation CorridorDOE/EIS-0250F-S2andFinal Envir

165

Certification for DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 1  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Based on discussions with the DOE Facility Representative and System Safety Oversight field personnel, who use DOE Order 422.1, this Order is still relevant in its current form. No significant changes are warranted at this time. In addition, this directive is not found to cause undue burden (i.e ., significant cost impacts, overly prescriptive, redundancy, or excessive reporting requirements) on Departmental elements and contractors.

2014-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

166

Microsoft Word - LS Power Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Behalf of LS Power Associates, L.P. on the Proposed Transmission Infrastructure Program Pursuant to the Federal Register Notice in Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 41, LS Power Associates, L.P. ("LS Power") submits the following comments on the Proposed Transmission Infrastructure Program ("TIP") by the Western Area Power Administration ("Western") to implement section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("Recovery Act"). 1. Introduction LS Power is an independent power generation and transmission group with a proven track record of successful development activities, operations management and commercial execution. LS Power has been involved in the development, construction, or operations of over 20,000 MW of power generation

167

Microsoft Word - OKalossa Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 8H033 Washington, D.C. 20585 RE: Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (September 17, 2010). Ladies and Gentlemen: Okaloosa Gas District (The District) an Independent Special District of the State of Florida is appreciative of the opportunity to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (Sep. 17, 2010). The Request seeks comment on

168

Microsoft Word - supplemental comment letter.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 23, 2006 Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Dear Mr. Mansueti: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., submits the following comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) February 17 Order for Rehearing Emergency Order 202-05-3. District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO- 05-01, Order No. 202-06-01 (Dep't of Energy, Feb. 17, 2006).

169

EEG's Preliminary Comments on Basis of Characterization  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12-03 07,58 FROM,LM TECHNOLOGIES INC 12-03 07,58 FROM,LM TECHNOLOGIES INC ID,5052343008 PAGE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION GROUP , OPPORTUNrTY ( ~ nve ACTION 8'.1PlOYER 1007 WYOMING BOULEVARD, N.E. SUITE F-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87100 (505) 828-1003 FAX (~) 826.1062 ~.:":o September 17, 1999 Dr -Ines Triay. Manager Carlsbad Area Office U-S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad. NM 88221-3090 -,' '0,-. - Dear Dr. Triay: EEG's preliminary comments on the Fundamental Bases of the Characterizaf;on ReCfl.tirement... for Disposal of Transuran;c Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant and Findings and Recommendations of the TranS1lranic U'aste Characterization :rask FQrce Final Report (August 9, 1999) are attached. Our comments are not a critique of the two reports but are limited to those recommendations

170

Microsoft Word - DOE Comments on IIP  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

David R. Moeller David R. Moeller Senior Attorney 218-723-3963 dmoeller@allete.com October 30, 2013 Julie A. Smith Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Minnesota Power's Comments Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53,436 (August 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Lawrence: Minnesota Power hereby provides comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") in the above-referenced Federal Register publication. Minnesota Power has been working closely with the DOE and other state and

171

Comments on the equation rax Reese Scott  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comments on the equation ±rax ± sby = c. Reese Scott Robert Styer revised 7 Sept 2013 For given not a member of a known infinite family). Some of these anomalous cases are quite high, e.g., (a, b, c, r, s number k such that kc = C, and for every i there exists a j such that kraxi = RAXj and ksbyi = SBYj , 1

Styer, Robert

172

Comment on "Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We comment on a recent paper by L. Baum and P. H. Frampton [Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 071301 (2007)] where it was argued that the entropy problem can be resolved in a peculiar cyclic universe model through a deflation mechanism (i.e., the universe is fragmented into many disconnected causal patches at the turnaround). We point out that in this cyclic model the Hubble length will become infinity at the turnaround, thus the deflation scenario is not valid.

Xin Zhang

2007-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

173

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation submits the following comments to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in hopes that their contribution can highlight and further the understanding of the DOE on the key role that integrated communications will play ineneabling utilities to deploy cost-effective long-term smart grid benefits. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation More Documents & Publications Comments of Tendril Networks Inc Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2001

174

Microsoft Word - neitb_noi_comment_final2.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB) Notice of to the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB) Notice of Inquiry Page 1 of 273 Comments Received In Response to the Federal Register Notice of Inquiry [FR doc. 04-16724] on the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB). The following material comprises the comments received by DOE in response to the Federal Register Notice of Inquiry [FR doc. 04-16724] issued on July 22, 2004, which solicited comments related to the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB). DOE presents the comments as received and without any endorsement of their validity. The comments are listed in order they were received. Appended 10/15/04 1. Comments of Control for the Process Industry, 8/18/04, 2:26pm

175

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016. The Plumbing Manufacturers Institute submits supplemental comments regarding the definition of showerheads in interpetive rule 10 C.F.R. Section 430.2. Comment alleges that the interpretive rule violates the APA and the EPA, but focuses on the economic impact of the rule, claiming that

176

Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension Recently I learned of interpretations of the University's comments submitted on January 30, 1998, that I think bear some clarification. One of our comments suggested an alternative for DOE if the civil fine exemption were to be eliminated. That comment was not an endorsement for eliminating the exemption; rather it is a means for partially mitigating the adverse consequences to the production of science were the exemption eliminated. The University has never believed that the risk of financial incentives or penalties is the most appropriate means of motivating non-profit organizations to either perform better or avoid inappropriate actions. Consequently we do not embrace the imposition of criminal or civil fines

177

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period September 29, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin J. Morgan morgan@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 Kelly K. Snyder snyderk@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada. The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011, rather than October 27. Within the draft SWEIS, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office presents a formal analysis of

178

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period September 29, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin J. Morgan morgan@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 Kelly K. Snyder snyderk@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada. The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011, rather than October 27. Within the draft SWEIS, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office presents a formal analysis of

179

EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments More Documents & Publications The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and the Rate-Related Issues That May Impede Its Expansion The potential benefits of distributed deneration and rate-related issues that may impede issues its expansion. June 2007 STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF PRIVATE WIRE LAWS ON DEVELOPMENT OF COMBINED HEAT AND POWER FACILITIE

180

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Challenges. Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. The Alliance to Save Energy is a coalition of prominent business, government, environmental, and consumer leaders who promote the efficient use of energy worldwide to benefit consumers, the environment, economy, and national security. The Alliance to Save Energy (the Alliance) thanks the Department of Energy for the opportunity to comment on broad issues of policy and logistical challenges faced in smart grid implementation. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. More Documents & Publications DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request

182

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation I am seeking to develop America's first Smart Grid R&D Testing business campus on 200 near-enterprise zone acres owned by Clatsop County Oregon zoned and master-planned as North Coast Business Park. This campus will feature a private sector-owned substation specifically designed for SG R&D testing that is currently being designed by SAIC firm RW Beck. Public Submission Draft Comments: Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation More Documents & Publications CenterPoint Comments City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:

183

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

184

AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in reply to initial comments of a number of entities to the Request for Information (Request or RFI) on access to data in the smart grid space, published by the Department of Energy (DOE) on May 11, 2010. AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy

185

Microsoft Word - Public Comments EPAct 1817 061507.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. Table of Contents 1. IDAHO ENERGY DIVISION ..............................................................................1 2. MARK B. LIVELY, LIVELY UTILITY (CONSULTING) ..............................2 3. STEVE HALL ........................................................................................................3 4. THERESE STOVALL, ORNL .............................................................................4

186

Public Comments Received on the Draft Voluntary Code of Conduct  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On September 12, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft Voluntary Code of Conduct (VCC), which addresses data privacy surrounding smart grid technologies, for public comment. The primary goal of the VCC document is to provide principles of conduct for voluntary adoption by utilities and third parties. The public comment period closed on October 14, 2014. The comments are available below for downloading.

187

RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal Comments...

188

Draft Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance Available for Public Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a Notice of Public Comment in the Federal Register, inviting the public to comment on DOE's Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance. The document is available for a 30 day comment period.

189

Comments of Tendril Networks Inc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tendril Networks Inc Tendril Networks Inc Comments of Tendril Networks Inc Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) in response to the Request for Information "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home energy management and demand response. Therefore, our comments will primarily address issues that affect metering technologies, consumer-facing programs and the integration of new technologies with grid infrastructure. Comments of Tendril Networks Inc More Documents & Publications Questions and Answers for the Smart Grid Investment Grant Program: Applicability of Buy American Provision of Section 1605 of the Recovery Act

190

Comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New England Electric Transmission Corporation on New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open Access Requirement for International Electric Transmission Facilities Comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open Access Requirement for International Electric Transmission Facilities Motion to intervene out of time and comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation, New England Hydro-Transmission Electric Company, Inc. and New England Hydro-Transmission Corporation and New England Power Company. Comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open Access Requirement for International Electric Transmission Facilities FE Docket No 99-1 (PP-76/EA-76) More Documents & Publications Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No.

191

Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of the Natural Resource...

192

Comment on "Taming the Pion Cloud of the Nucleon"  

SciTech Connect

A Comment on the Letter by M. Alberg and G.?A. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 172001 (2012) The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Ji, Chueng Ryong [North Carolina State U.; Melnitchouk, Wally [JLAB; Thomas, Anthony W. [Adelaide U.

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Meetings EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project...

194

NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) entitled, Reducing Regulatory...

195

Comment on 'Kinetic Simulations of Magnetized Turbulence in Astrophysical Plasmas'  

SciTech Connect

A Comment on the Letter by G. G. Howes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 065004 (2008). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Matthaeus, W. H.; Servidio, S. [Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 19716 (United States); Dmitruk, P. [Departamento de Fisica Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina (Argentina)

2008-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

196

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

which transmission congestion may addressed, including enhanced energy efficiency, demand response, more local generation, and additional transmission capacity. To submit comments...

197

Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy Comments of the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's Implementing the National Broadband Plan by...

198

Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and...

199

Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Register 33611 (June 14, 2010). "Cybersecurity for State Regulators" - NARUC Primer (June 2012) Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer...

200

DOE Comments - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

"Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (UFP-QAPP) Manual" 4. United States Department of Energy Comments on Approach to Reinventing Regulations on Storing...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

EIS-0369: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridor and Rail Alignment The Department of Energy is now announcing...

202

Comments on reducing regulatory burden | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces, and accessories Comments on reducing regulatory burden More...

203

Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Plan Docket No. EO-05-01: Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy's...

204

Comment on Levinson's Theorem for the Dirac Equation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by Nathan Poliatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2507 (1993). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Zhong-Qi Ma

1996-05-06T23:59:59.000Z

205

Agency Information Collection Extension Notice of Public Comment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Agency Information Collection Extension Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 178, September 15, 2014 Agency Information Collection Extension Notice of Public...

206

Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River...

207

Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of...

208

Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

(ASHRAE) Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) AT&T Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE) Comments BGE Pilot 2008 BGE Pilot 2009 Browning, Stephen Addressing...

209

Declaration of Charles Wodrich in Support of Supplemental Comments...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016...

210

Reply to Yang et al.'s comment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This is to reply to a recent comment by Yang, Yuan and Zhang on ``Teleportation of two-quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resorces''.

Nguyen Ba An

2006-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

211

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments...

212

Power North America RFI Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

North America RFI Comments: Under most regulatory rules and policies in the U.S., utilities are incentivized to making the lowest cost investment which yields the highest...

213

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments...

214

Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. More Documents...

215

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments...

216

Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative More...

217

Comments on Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by promoting clean energy alternatives and ensuring proper regulation of coal-fired power plants in Maryland, DC and Virginia. Comments on Emergency Order to Resume Limited...

218

Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Emergency Order and allow federal and state regulators the discretion to enforce binding air pollution control laws. Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the...

219

Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant...

220

Emailed Comments of Elizabeth Chimento RE: Pepco Scheduled Line...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation 1 To provide greater transparency to the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup of nuclear legacy waste, DOE made the "West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to DOE by one individual and two organizations:  Raymond C. Vaughan, PhD.,  The West Valley Citizen Task Force, and  The Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes.

222

Comment on Tunable generation and adsorption of energetic compounds...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Tunable generation and adsorption of energetic compounds in the vapor phase at trace levels: A tool for testing and Comment on Tunable generation and adsorption of energetic...

223

Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For Information...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For Information (RFI): Addressing Policy & Logistical Challenges. Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For...

224

Microsoft Word - 2012_0302_BPAI5_SupplementalCommentReport_FINAL...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commenters asked if BPA would provide similar data for eliminated routes to the Pearl substation. Commenters requested that BPA provide the criteria used to create the data...

225

E-Print Network 3.0 - analysis comment issue Sample Search Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

results for: analysis comment issue Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Public Participation in Energy Commission and BLM Process Phases are in bold, public review and comment...

226

NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby...

227

Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Hussmann manufacturer of commercial refrigeration products, appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's Request for Comments on the topic of the Regulatory...

228

Can quantum mechanics be considered as statistical?(comment)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This is a short manuscript which was initially submitted to Nature Physics as a comment to the PBR (Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., Rudolph, T) paper just after its publication in 2012. The comment was not accepted. I however think that the argumentation is correct: one is free to judge!

A. Drezet

2012-09-13T23:59:59.000Z

229

CUSTOMER COMMENTS ON COUNCIL'S DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING BPA'S FUTURE ROLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 CUSTOMER COMMENTS ON COUNCIL'S DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING BPA'S FUTURE ROLE INTRODUCTION These comments are submitted on behalf of BPA's customers in response to the draft recommendations released into the topic of BPA's future role, and look forward to continuing to work with the Council to successfully

230

Microsoft Word - Contents-comments-Sept.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Responses U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah September 2005 The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of

231

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting of Transmission Lines Submitted as of March 28, 2012 2 1.0 Background. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project (SunZia or the Project) is a joint development effort currently underway in Arizona and New Mexico. The Project definition includes licensing, permitting, financing, constructing and operating up to two 500 kilovolt alternating current (AC) transmission lines and up to five interconnecting substations.

232

Russia's energy policy: A framing comment  

SciTech Connect

A prominent specialist on the Russian economy provides a framing comment on two preceding papers entitled 'Russia's Energy Policy' (by Vladimir Milov, Leonard Coburn, and Igor Danchenko) and 'Russia's Energy Policy: A Divergent View' (by Matthew J. Sagers). The author argues that Russia's current energy policy should be viewed as an outcome of competition between three overlapping programs. In this context, he identifies three policy models - the old Soviet, the liberal or oligarchic, and the most recent state capitalist. The latter is currently supported by President Putin, who prioritizes diversification of the country's economy at the expense of diminished investments in the oil and gas sector.

Aslund, A. [Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC (United States)

2006-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

233

EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31: Extension of Public Comment Period 31: Extension of Public Comment Period EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project, CA The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice of availability on July 22, 2013 (78 FR 43870) that provided for a comment period ending September 3, 2013. DOE is extending the public comment period to October 1, 2013, and announces public hearings for the Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project Preliminary Staff Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (PSA/DEIS; DOE/EIS--0431D; 78 FR 52764). The PSA/DEIS is available on the internet at http://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0431-draft-environmental-impact-statement

234

EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Period Public Comment Period EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project, CA The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice of availability on July 22, 2013 (78 FR 43870) that provided for a comment period ending September 3, 2013. DOE is extending the public comment period to October 1, 2013, and announces public hearings for the Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project Preliminary Staff Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (PSA/DEIS; DOE/EIS--0431D; 78 FR 52764). The PSA/DEIS is available on the internet at http://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0431-draft-environmental-impact-statement or on the CEC electronic docket site at

235

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act COMMENTS by OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORP on 62 CFR 68272, Re: Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel; Preparation of Report to Congress on Price-Anderson Act. OHM Remediation Services Corp. ("OHM") is a diversified services firm for government and private sector clients and provides a broad range of outsourced services including environmental remediation and project, program and construction management services. OHM is submitting comments, questions and requests for clarification to the DOE because the continued viability of the Act is crucial to OHM's core business. However, the Act needs to be modified to reflect the current state of the nuclear industry which currently has a stronger focus on decommissioning and

236

City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 The City of Fort Collins provided comments to the Department of Energy's notice of intent to seek approval of an extension of Information Collection 1910-5149 for Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant reporting for four years, which was published in the Federal Register August 10, 2011, Vol. 76, No. 154, page 49460. Fort Collins finds the current collection period burdensome and recommends quarterly reporting. View information on Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grants. View the Federal Register Notice. City of Fort Collins FRN Information Collection comments.pdf More Documents & Publications

237

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013 - 9:10am Addthis John Hale III John Hale III Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is currently seeking comments, now through July 29, on an opportunity for Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services. Comments are sought from interested vendors holding active GSA Schedule 70 contracts (General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software, and Services) covering SIN 132-51 (Information Technology Professional Services) on draft performance-based scopes of work. The anticipated NAICS code is 541513 - Computer Facilities Management Services,

238

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") hereby submits the following comments in response to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26203 (May 11, 2010). The RFI requests comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding current and potential practices and policies for the states and other entities to empower consumers, and perhaps others, through access to detailed energy

239

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials November 12, 2013 - 4:33pm Addthis Tim Jackson Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office NOTICE: DOE has extended the public comment period on its Draft Environmental Assessment for Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials to January 10, 2014. The U.S. Department of Energy invites the public to read and comment on a draft environmental assessment it has prepared for a proposal to resume transient testing of nuclear fuels and materials at either Idaho National

240

Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring Federal Authorizations Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring Federal Authorizations September 25, 2013 - 4:24pm Addthis On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. An announcement extending the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process was published in the Federal Register on

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 The Department of Energy invited public comment on DOE's intent to publish the Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline. The guideline describes a risk management process that is targeted to the specific needs of electricity sector organizations and adds to the body of resources that help refine the definition and application of effective cybersecurity for all organizations in the Electricity Sector. Comments were due by October 28, 2011.

242

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013 - 9:10am Addthis John Hale III John Hale III Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is currently seeking comments, now through July 29, on an opportunity for Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services. Comments are sought from interested vendors holding active GSA Schedule 70 contracts (General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software, and Services) covering SIN 132-51 (Information Technology Professional Services) on draft performance-based scopes of work. The anticipated NAICS code is 541513 - Computer Facilities Management Services,

243

Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors November 9, 2006 - 9:38am Addthis Under Section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Department of Energy must issue a report based on the Department's August 8 Congestion Study. In that report, the Secretary may designate as a "national interest electric transmission corridor" (National Corridor) any geographic area experiencing electric energy transmission capacity constraints or congestion that adversely affects consumers. After issuing the August 8 Congestion Study, the Department invited public comment and received comments on the study from a variety of entities

244

SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments July 20, 2011 - 2:46pm Addthis As part of its ongoing effort regarding the formation of smart grid policy, the Department of Energy issued a Request for Information in September of 2010 on the topic of "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." The purpose was to solicit comments from interested stakeholders on policy and logistical challenges that confront smart grid implementation, and recommendations on how to best overcome those challenges. The comments and recommendations will help inform the Department and the Administration's analysis of policy challenges and possible solutions being developed by the Smart Grid Subcommittee of the National Science and

245

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations, May 8, 2007. DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations, May 8, 2007. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that it will hold four additional public meetings for the two draft National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (National Corridors) during the 60-day public comment period, which will close on July 6, 2007. The four additional meetings will be held in June in: Phoenix, Arizona; Las Vegas, Nevada; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Rochester, New York. DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations, May 8, 2007. More Documents & Publications DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designations

246

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act COMMENTS by OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORP on 62 CFR 68272, Re: Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel; Preparation of Report to Congress on Price-Anderson Act. OHM Remediation Services Corp. ("OHM") is a diversified services firm for government and private sector clients and provides a broad range of outsourced services including environmental remediation and project, program and construction management services. OHM is submitting comments, questions and requests for clarification to the DOE because the continued viability of the Act is crucial to OHM's core business. However, the Act needs to be modified to reflect the current state of the nuclear industry which currently has a stronger focus on decommissioning and

247

Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 The Department of Energy invited public comment on DOE's intent to publish the Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline. The guideline describes a risk management process that is targeted to the specific needs of electricity sector organizations and adds to the body of resources that help refine the definition and application of effective cybersecurity for all organizations in the Electricity Sector. Comments were due by October 28, 2011.

248

Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. ("Southern"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE's") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, about current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities.1 Southern appreciates the opportunity to provide DOE with additional information and to respond to the initial comments submitted in this proceeding. As discussed more fully below, Southern believes that privately-owned and operated systems will continue to be needed for command and control operations. In addition, Southern is not

249

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response to U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (Jul. 27, 2010) and 75 Fed. Reg. 51986 (Aug. 24, 2010). Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation More Documents & Publications CIGNLCommentsDOECSCRulemaking11-30-10.doc DOE Notice of Inquiry on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) Contingent Cost Allocation - March 2, 2011 Meeting

250

BGE_Comments_CurrentComms.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reading (based Reading (based on hourly reads) Cellular network 5000 30 minutes 19.2K >90% <15 sec >95% 4 1 2 Direct Load Control 22 250K 8 hours 1K 100% <120 sec >99% 2 1 2 Real time pricing At the customer premises At charging stations 53 1755 8 hours 9600 bps >90% 5 sec <5 per mo. >95% 5 2 1 CBC-5000 2330 CBC-7000 1621 LVC N/A 638 4 hours N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A See comment See comment N/A N/A Customer Calls N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Applications Distributed Generation Management in-Home Display of Customer Usage Automated Feeder Switching Transformer Monitoring Voltage and Current Monitoring 8 hours 1K >60% Capacitor Bank Control Fault Current Indicator 10 sec >99% 4 1 2 Quantified Estimates Ranking of Relative Importance of Each Estimated Number of End Point Devices to

251

Comment submitted by Traulsen regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by Traulsen regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

252

Comment submitted by Whirlpool Corporation regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by Whirlpool Corporation regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

253

Comment submitted by Consumers Union regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by Consumers Union regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

254

m011.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 b 1 (1235) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (1 + - ) b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS NODE=M011M NODE=M011M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. 1225 ± 5 WEIDENAUER 93 ASTE p p → 2π + 2π - π 0 1235 ± 15 ALDE 92C GAM2 38,100 π - p → ω π 0 n 1236 ± 16 FUKUI 91 SPEC 8.95 π - p → ω π 0 n 1222 ± 6 ATKINSON 84E OMEG ± 25-55 γ p → ω π X OCCUR=2 1237 ± 7 ATKINSON 84E OMEG 0 25-55 γ p → ω π X 1239 ± 5 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → ω π p 1251 ± 8 450 GESSAROLI 77 HBC - 11 π - p → π - ω p 1245 ± 11 890 FLATTE 76C HBC - 4.2 K - p → π - ω Σ + 1222 ± 4 1400 CHALOUPKA 74 HBC - 3.9 π - p 1220 ± 7 600 KARSHON 74B HBC + 4.9 π + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1190 ± 10 AUGUSTIN 89 DM2 ± e + e - → 5π 1213 ± 5 ATKINSON

255

m036.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 a 0 (980) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (0 + + ) See our minireview on scalar mesons under f 0 (500). (See the index NODE=M036 for the page number.) a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS NODE=M036205 NODE=M036MX VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE Mass determination very model dependent → UNCHECKED ← η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY NODE=M036M1 NODE=M036M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 982.5 ± 1.6 ± 1.1 16.9k 1 AMBROSINO 09F KLOE 1.02 e + e - → η π 0 γ 986 ± 4 ANISOVICH 09 RVUE 0.0 p p, π N 982.3 + 0.6 - 0.7 + 3.1 - 4.7 2 UEHARA 09A BELL γ γ → π 0 η 987.4 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 3,4 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η OCCUR=2 989.1 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 4,5 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η 985 ± 4 ± 6 318 ACHARD 02B

256

m035.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 K ∗ 4 (2045) I (J P ) = 1 2 (4 + ) K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS NODE=M035M NODE=M035M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 2062 ± 14 ± 13 1 ASTON 86 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 2039 ± 10 400 2,3 CLELAND 82 SPEC ± 50 K + p → K 0 S π ± p 2070 + 100 - 40 4 ASTON 81C LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2079 ± 7 431 TORRES 86 MPSF 400 p A → 4K X 2088 ± 20 650 BAUBILLIER 82 HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 S π - p 2115 ± 46 488 CARMONY 77 HBC 0 9 K + d → K + π 's X 1 From a fit to all moments. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=E 2 From a fit to 8 moments. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=B 3 Number of events evaluated by us. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=W 4 From energy-independent partial-wave analysis. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=D K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗

257

m022.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

430) 430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 + ) We consider that phase-shift analyses provide more reliable determi- nations of the mass and width. K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 1420 ± 4 1587 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 1436 ± 5.5 400 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 30 K + p → K 0 S π + p 1430 ± 3.2 1500 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 50 K + p → K 0 S π + p 1430 ± 3.2 1200 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC - 50 K + p → K 0 S π - p 1423 ± 5 935 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 1428.0± 4.6 3 MARTIN 78 SPEC + 10 K ± p → K 0 S π p 1423.8± 4.6 3 MARTIN 78 SPEC - 10 K ± p → K 0 S π p 1420.0± 3.1 1400 AGUILAR-... 71B

258

m060.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 K ∗ 3 (1780) I (J P ) = 1 2 (3 - ) K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS NODE=M060M NODE=M060M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 1781 ± 8 ± 4 1 ASTON 88 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 1740 ± 14 ± 15 1 ASTON 87 LASS 0 11 K - p → K 0 π + π - n 1779 ± 11 2 BALDI 76 SPEC + 10 K + p → K 0 π + p 1776 ± 26 3 BRANDENB... 76D ASPK 0 13 K ± p → K ± π ∓ N * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1720 ± 10 ± 15 6111 4 BIRD 89 LASS - 11 K - p → K 0 π - p 1749 ± 10 ASTON 88B LASS - 11 K - p → K - η p 1780 ± 9 300 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 1790 ± 15 BAUBILLIER 82B HBC 0 8.25 K - p → K 0 S 2π N 1784 ± 9 2060 CLELAND 82 SPEC ± 50 K + p → K 0 S π ± p 1786 ± 15 5 ASTON 81D LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 1762 ± 9 190 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 1850 ± 50 ETKIN 80 MPS

259

m023.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

770) 770) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 - ) See our mini-review in the 2004 edition of this Review, PDG 04. K 2 (1770) MASS K 2 (1770) MASS K 2 (1770) MASS K 2 (1770) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1773± 8 1773± 8 1773± 8 1773± 8 1 ASTON 93 LASS 11K - p → K - ω p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1743± 15 TIKHOMIROV 03 SPEC 40.0 π - C → K 0 S K 0 S K 0 L X 1810± 20 FRAME 86 OMEG + 13 K + p → φK + p ∼ 1730 ARMSTRONG 83 OMEG - 18.5 K - p → 3K p ∼ 1780 2 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p 1710± 15 60 CHUNG 74 HBC - 7.3 K - p → K - ω p 1767± 6 BLIEDEN 72 MMS - 11-16 K - p 1730± 20 306 3 FIRESTONE 72B DBC + 12 K + d 1765± 40 4 COLLEY 71 HBC + 10 K + p → K 2π N 1740 DENEGRI 71 DBC - 12.6 K - d → K 2π d 1745± 20 AGUILAR-... 70C HBC - 4.6 K - p 1780± 15 BARTSCH 70C HBC - 10.1 K - p 1760± 15 LUDLAM 70 HBC - 12.6 K - p 1 From a partial wave analysis of the K - ω system. 2 From a partial wave analysis of the K - 2π system. 3 Produced

260

m064.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

400) 400) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) K 1 (1400) MASS K 1 (1400) MASS K 1 (1400) MASS K 1 (1400) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1463± 64 ± 68 7k ASNER 00B CLEO ± τ - → K - π + π - ν τ 1373± 14 ± 18 1 ASTON 87 LASS 0 11 K - p → K 0 π + π - n 1392± 18 BAUBILLIER 82B HBC 0 8.25 K - p → K 0 S π + π - n 1410± 25 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p 1415± 15 ETKIN 80 MPS 0 6 K - p → K 0 π + π - n 1404± 10 2 CARNEGIE 77 ASPK ± 13 K ± p → (K π π) ± p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1418± 8 25k 3 ABLIKIM 06C BES2 J/ψ → K ∗ (892) 0 K + π - ∼ 1350 4 TORNQVIST 82B RVUE ∼ 1400 VERGEEST 79 HBC - 4.2 K - p → (K π π) - p ∼ 1400 BRANDENB... 76 ASPK ± 13 K ± p → (K π π) ± p 1420 DAVIS 72 HBC + 12 K + p 1368± 18 FIRESTONE 72B DBC + 12 K + d 1 From partial-wave analysis of K 0 π + π - system. 2 From a model-dependent fit with Gaussian

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

s010.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

± ± I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 - ) A REVIEW GOES HERE - Check our WWW List of Reviews K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 2.8. 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below. 493.696± 0.007 1 DENISOV 91 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.636± 0.011 2 GALL 88 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.640± 0.054 LUM 81 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.670± 0.029 BARKOV 79 EMUL ± e + e - → K + K - 493.657± 0.020 2 CHENG 75 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.691± 0.040 BACKENSTO...73 CNTR - Kaonic atoms * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 493.631± 0.007 GALL 88 CNTR - K - Pb (9→ 8) 493.675± 0.026 GALL 88 CNTR - K - Pb (11→ 10) 493.709± 0.073

262

m036.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

980) 980) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (0 + + ) See our minireview on scalar mesons under f 0 (500). (See the index for the page number.) a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE Mass determination very model dependent η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 982.5 ± 1.6 ± 1.1 16.9k 1 AMBROSINO 09F KLOE 1.02 e + e - → η π 0 γ 986 ± 4 ANISOVICH 09 RVUE 0.0 p p, π N 982.3 + 0.6 - 0.7 + 3.1 - 4.7 2 UEHARA 09A BELL γ γ → π 0 η 987.4 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 3,4 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η 989.1 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 4,5 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η 985 ± 4 ± 6 318 ACHARD 02B L3 183-209 e + e - → e + e - η π + π - 995 + 52 - 10 36 6 ACHASOV 00F SND e + e - → η π 0 γ 994 + 33 - 8 36 7 ACHASOV

263

m011.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 (1235) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (1 + - ) b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. 1225 ± 5 WEIDENAUER 93 ASTE p p → 2π + 2π - π 0 1235 ± 15 ALDE 92C GAM2 38,100 π - p → ω π 0 n 1236 ± 16 FUKUI 91 SPEC 8.95 π - p → ω π 0 n 1222 ± 6 ATKINSON 84E OMEG ± 25-55 γ p → ω π X 1237 ± 7 ATKINSON 84E OMEG 0 25-55 γ p → ω π X 1239 ± 5 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → ω π p 1251 ± 8 450 GESSAROLI 77 HBC - 11 π - p → π - ω p 1245 ± 11 890 FLATTE 76C HBC - 4.2 K - p → π - ω Σ + 1222 ± 4 1400 CHALOUPKA 74 HBC - 3.9 π - p 1220 ± 7 600 KARSHON 74B HBC + 4.9 π + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1190 ± 10 AUGUSTIN 89 DM2 ± e + e - → 5π 1213 ± 5 ATKINSON 84C OMEG 0 20-70 γ p 1271 ± 11

264

s010.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 K ± I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 - ) A REVIEW GOES HERE - Check our WWW List of Reviews NODE=S010203 K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS NODE=S010M NODE=S010M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 2.8. 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below. 493.696 ± 0.007 1 DENISOV 91 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.636 ± 0.011 2 GALL 88 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.640 ± 0.054 LUM 81 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.670 ± 0.029 BARKOV 79 EMUL ± e + e - → K + K - 493.657 ± 0.020 2 CHENG 75 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.691 ± 0.040 BACKENSTO...73 CNTR - Kaonic atoms * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * OCCUR=2 493.631 ± 0.007 GALL 88 CNTR - K - Pb (9→ 8) OCCUR=3 493.675

265

m019.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

430) 430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 + ) See our minireview in the 1994 edition and in this edition under the f 0 (500). K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1427 ± 4 ± 13 1 BUGG 10 RVUE S-matrix pole 1466.6± 0.7 ± 3.4 141k 2 BONVICINI 08A CLEO D + → K - π + π + ∼ 1412 3 LINK 07 FOCS 0 D + → K - K + π + 1461.0± 4.0 ± 2.1 54k 4 LINK 07B FOCS D + → K - π + π + 1406 ± 29 5 BUGG 06 RVUE 1435 ± 6 6 ZHOU 06 RVUE K p → K - π + n 1455 ± 20 ± 15 ABLIKIM 05Q BES2 ψ(2S) → γ π + π - K + K - 1456 ± 8 7 ZHENG 04 RVUE K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1419 8 BUGG 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1440 9 LI 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n 1459 ± 9 15k 10 AITALA 02 E791 D + → K - π + π + ∼ 1440 11 JAMIN 00 RVUE K p → K p 1436 ± 8 12 BARBERIS 98E OMEG 450

266

m022.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 K ∗ 2 (1430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 + ) We consider that phase-shift analyses provide more reliable determi- NODE=M022 nations of the mass and width. K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS NODE=M022205 CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π NODE=M022M1 NODE=M022M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 1420 ± 4 1587 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 1436 ± 5.5 400 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 30 K + p → K 0 S π + p OCCUR=2 1430 ± 3.2 1500 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 50 K + p → K 0 S π + p OCCUR=3 1430 ± 3.2 1200 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC - 50 K + p → K 0 S π - p 1423 ± 5 935 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 1428.0 ± 4.6 3 MARTIN 78 SPEC + 10 K ± p → K 0 S π p OCCUR=2

267

m034.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

670) 670) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (2 - + ) π 2 (1670) MASS π 2 (1670) MASS π 2 (1670) MASS π 2 (1670) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below. 1658 ± 3 + 24 - 8 420k ALEKSEEV 10 COMP 190 π - P b → π - π - π + Pb ' 1749 ± 10 ± 100 145k LU 05 B852 18 π - p → ω π - π 0 p 1676 ± 3 ± 8 1 CHUNG 02 B852 18.3 π - p → π + π - π - p 1685 ± 10 ± 30 2 BARBERIS 01 450 p p → p f 3π 0 p s 1687 ± 9 ± 15 AMELIN 99 VES 37 π - A → ω π - π 0 A ∗ 1669 ± 4 BARBERIS 98B 450 p p → p f ρ π p s 1670 ± 4 BARBERIS 98B 450 p p → p f f 2 (1270) π p s 1730 ± 20 3 AMELIN 95B VES 36 π - A → π + π - π - A 1690 ± 14 4 BERDNIKOV 94 VES 37 π - A → K + K - π - A 1710 ± 20 700 ANTIPOV 87 SIGM - 50 π - Cu → µ + µ - π - Cu 1676 ± 6 4 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → 3π p 1657 ± 14 4,5 DAUM 80D SPEC - 63-94 π p → 3π X 1662 ± 10 2000

268

m012.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a a 2 (1320) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (2 + + ) a 2 (1320) MASS a 2 (1320) MASS a 2 (1320) MASS a 2 (1320) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 4 datablocks that follow this one. Error includes scale factor of 1.2. 3π MODE 3π MODE 3π MODE 3π MODE VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below. 1321 ± 1 + 0 - 7 420k ALEKSEEV 10 COMP 190 π - P b → π - π - π + Pb ' 1326 ± 2 ± 2 CHUNG 02 B852 18.3 π - p → π + π - π - p 1317 ± 3 BARBERIS 98B 450 p p → p f π + π - π 0 p s 1323 ± 4 ± 3 ACCIARRI 97T L3 e + e - → e + e - π + π - π 0 1320 ± 7 ALBRECHT 97B ARG e + e - → e

269

m018.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 K ∗ (892) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 - ) K ∗ (892) MASS K ∗ (892) MASS K ∗ (892) MASS K ∗ (892) MASS NODE=M018205 CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED NODE=M018M1 NODE=M018M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 892.6 ± 0.5 5840 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 888 ± 3 NAPIER 84 SPEC + 200 π - p → 2K 0 S X OCCUR=2 891 ± 1 NAPIER 84 SPEC - 200 π - p → 2K 0 S X 891.7 ± 2.1 3700 BARTH 83 HBC + 70 K + p → K 0 π + X 891 ± 1 4100 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 892.8 ± 1.6 AJINENKO 80 HBC + 32 K + p → K 0 π + X 890.7 ± 0.9 1800 AGUILAR-... 78B HBC ± 0.76 p p → K ∓ K 0 S π ± 886.6 ± 2.4 1225 BALAND 78 HBC ± 12 p p → (K π) ± X 891.7 ± 0.6 6706 COOPER 78 HBC ± 0.76 p p → (K π) ± X 891.9 ± 0.7 9000 1 PALER 75 HBC - 14.3 K - p → (K π) - X

270

m019.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 K ∗ 0 (1430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 + ) See our minireview in the 1994 edition and in this edition under the NODE=M019 f 0 (500). K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS NODE=M019M NODE=M019M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1427 ± 4 ± 13 1 BUGG 10 RVUE S-matrix pole 1466.6 ± 0.7 ± 3.4 141k 2 BONVICINI 08A CLEO D + → K - π + π + ∼ 1412 3 LINK 07 FOCS 0 D + → K - K + π + 1461.0 ± 4.0 ± 2.1 54k 4 LINK 07B FOCS D + → K - π + π + 1406 ± 29 5 BUGG 06 RVUE 1435 ± 6 6 ZHOU 06 RVUE K p → K - π + n 1455 ± 20 ± 15 ABLIKIM 05Q BES2 ψ(2S) → γ π + π - K + K - 1456 ± 8 7 ZHENG 04 RVUE K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1419 8 BUGG 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1440 9 LI 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n 1459 ± 9 15k 10 AITALA 02 E791 D + → K - π + π + ∼

271

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response to U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (Jul. 27, 2010) and 75 Fed. Reg. 51986 (Aug. 24, 2010). Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation More Documents & Publications DOE Notice of Inquiry on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) Contingent Cost Allocation - March 2, 2011 Meeting

272

Comments of the American Petroleum Institute | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the American Petroleum Institute the American Petroleum Institute Comments of the American Petroleum Institute Similar to the electric utility industry's implementation of smart grid, oil and natural gas companies are in the midst of transitioning to next generation communications technology that will provide significant benefits in terms of safety, incident response, effectiveness and efficiency that are critical to United States energy independence. At the same time, however, API's members find themselves increasingly constrained by the lack of exclusive, licensed spectrum available for higher-speed applications. Comments of the American Petroleum Institute More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

273

Comments of the American Petroleum Institute | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Petroleum Institute Petroleum Institute Comments of the American Petroleum Institute Similar to the electric utility industry's implementation of smart grid, oil and natural gas companies are in the midst of transitioning to next generation communications technology that will provide significant benefits in terms of safety, incident response, effectiveness and efficiency that are critical to United States energy independence. At the same time, however, API's members find themselves increasingly constrained by the lack of exclusive, licensed spectrum available for higher-speed applications. Comments of the American Petroleum Institute More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements

274

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute The Edison Electric Institute ("EEI"), on behalf of its member companies, hereby submits the following comments in response to the request by the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") for information on a wide range of issues dealing with Smart Grid technology, applications, consumer interaction, policy initiatives and economic impacts, including the definition of Smart Grid; interactions with and implications for residential, commercial and industrial customers; Smart Grid costs and benefits; collaboration between utilities, device manufacturers and energy

275

Comments of Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Utilities Telecom Council Utilities Telecom Council Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Urgent action is needed to address utilities communications needs. Utilities and other CII are deploying smart grid and making investments in communications upgrades now. Promoting access to spectrum will accelerate the deployment of smart grid and other CII communications, which will in turn promote larger public policy goals for energy independence, infrastructure security, environmental quality and public safety. Therefore, UTC looks forward to working with the DOE, as well as the FCC and NTIA to support the communications needs of utilities and other CII. Comments of Utilities Telecom Council More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

276

FINAL-west-doe-rfi-comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October October 31, 2013 Mr. Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects, Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53436 (Aug. 29, 2013) Dear Mr. Lawrence: I. INTRODUCTION Western Energy Supply and Transmission Associates ("WEST") 1 respectfully submits these comments in response to the questions raised in the above-referenced Department of Energy (DOE) Request for Information (RFI). This RFI addresses the proposed pre-application process for siting of transmission projects requiring interagency

277

April 1-10 comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

David David Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:02 AM To: contractor pensions Subject: Hanford The Department of Energy is seeking public comment regarding the funding of pension and health care benefits for workers on DOE sites. Why is DOE only now concerned with this? I work at the Hanford Reservation in Washington State. I've been here for fifteen years. In 1987, a multi-contractor pension system was negotiated with the union and the contractors. Prior to this, there were multiple pension plans due to the multiple contractors performing work for DOE. The multi-employer plan was designed to save money for DOE. A detailed cost analysis was conveyed to DOE-Headquarters that showed what the plan would cost to fund through 2012. DOE-Headquarters

278

Comments of the American Wind Energy Associ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the American Wind Energy Association in response to the Department of Energy's of the American Wind Energy Association in response to the Department of Energy's solicitation for comments on the upcoming National Electric Transmission Congestion Study I. AWEA strongly believes that the Department of Energy (DOE) should permit transmission developers to propose "project-specific" corridors, which would allow DOE to designate corridors upon request at any time anywhere in the Lower 48 states if a developer can demonstrate that its proposed corridor meets the criteria for such a designation. This would be an additional improvement beyond the process that has been publicly discussed as DOE's plan, in which DOE would take the lead in identifying any areas where power flows are

279

Comment on 'Nonlocality, Counterfactuals and Quantum Mechanics'  

SciTech Connect

A recent proof [H. P. Stapp, Am. J. Phys. 65, 300 (1997)], formulated in the symbolic language of modal logic, claims to show that contemporary quantum theory, viewed as a set of rules that allow us to calculate statistical predictions among certain kinds of observations, cannot be imbedded in any rational framework that conforms to the principles that (1) the experimenters' choices of which experiments they will perform can be considered to be free choices, (2) outcomes of measurements are unique, and (3) the free choices just mentioned have no backward-in-time effects of any kind. This claim is similar to Bell's theorem, but much stronger, because no reality assumption alien to quantum philosophy is used. The paper being commented on [W. Unruh, Phys. Rev. A 59, 126 (1999)] argues that some such reality assumption has been ''smuggled'' in. That argument is examined here and shown, I believe, to be defective.

Stapp, H.P.

1999-04-14T23:59:59.000Z

280

Bioethical issues: The new desaparecidos a comment  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The author makes a comment about the recently approved Italian law known as 'security package' (DDL 733-B), that introduces the crime of clandestinity. An illegal alien, who would by chance give birth to a baby in this country, could not recognise her child legally nor register the baby's birth and have it recognised in her family status. The Italian State is going to ignore these children. They are going to be invisible, with a serious risk for their human dignity and healthcare. This law, in absolute contradiction with the Constitution of the Italian Republic, contains a dangerous crack that could foster a return to the slavery, to the division between humans and non-humans; among the non-humans are first of all children, women and those who are not in line with the rules of the moment.

Irene Calesini

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Federal Registry Comments May 25 2007.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

tn6562 tn6562 Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:17 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Continue Support of Pensions for SRS Retirees As the contract for SRS changes hands I want to thank you for your continued support of the SRS retirees pensions and medical benefit's. For the past ten years I have depended upon these benefits for my support and welfare. This is a very important issue of which I have great concern. Your attention in incorporating existing pension and medical benefits into the new contract is appreciated. Thank you Thomas S Mann, retiree -----Original Message----- From: Madden, Daniel Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 5:37 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Late comment DOE should act aggressively to end defined benefit pensions. I was surprised to see that

282

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Volume 2: Comment and Response Document: Chapters 3 and 4: Responses to Comments and References  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS 3 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This section provides DOE's responses to comments received during the public comment period. Indices of the DOE responses are provided by document number (Table 3.1), by commentors' last name (Table 3.2), and by commentors' company/organization (Table 3.3). Most of the comments received apply to both the Portsmouth and the Paducah conversion facility EISs. However, there are some comment documents that apply specifically to one EIS or the other. An index of comment documents indicating their applicability to each EIS is given in Table 3.4. Table 3.5 lists only those comment documents that apply to the Portsmouth EIS, and Table 3.6 lists those comment documents that apply to the Paducah EIS. Table 3.7 lists the

283

Comments on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'and 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper includes two comments. The first one is a comment on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'. Two different efficient methods are presented to modify some details of N. Ba An's protocol, so that teleportation of two quNit entanglement can be successfully achieved in terms of the revised N. Ba An's protocol. The second one is a comment on 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'.

Jie Yang; Hao Yuan; Zhan-jun Zhang

2006-12-24T23:59:59.000Z

284

Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No. EO-05-01. Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve the Potomac River Substation on January 9, 2006. Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed

285

DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Certification and Enforcement Notice Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking October 15, 2010 - 10:22am Addthis In response to a formal request, the Department has extended to October 29, 2010, the deadline for submission of comments in response to the Notice or Proposed Rulemaking on the certification and enforcement of the Department's energy conservation standards. (75 FR 56796). The signed extension provided here will be published shortly in the Federal Register. Addthis Related Articles DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act Department of Energy Issues Final Rule on Loan Guarantees

286

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines.

287

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site September 1, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Tim Jackson 208-526-8484 The U.S. Department of Energy invites the public to read and comment on a draft environmental assessment it has prepared, for a proposal to provide a replacement capability for continued disposal of remote-handled low-level radioactive waste that is generated at the Idaho National Laboratory site.

288

Microsoft Word - PMI Comments on DOE Guidance.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead" Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 Pursuant to discussions with the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of the General Counsel, which has permitted this filing to be made after the original deadline for submission of comments, the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI) respectfully submits these supplemental comments regarding the economic impacts of the DOE's draft interpretation of the term "showerhead" in 10 C.F.R. § 430.2 (the "Interpretive Rule"). INTRODUCTION In its prior submissions, PMI argued that DOE's proposed Interpretive Rule should be subject to the rulemaking procedures in the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), and that the

289

DOE Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low-Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site DOE Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low-Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site October 13, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Tim Jackson 208-526-8484 In response to requests from people interested in National Environmental Policy Act activities occurring at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Operations Office, the department has extended the public comment period that began September 1 on the Draft Environmental Assessment for

290

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations May 8, 2007 - 11:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that it will hold four additional public meetings for the two draft National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (National Corridors) during the 60-day public comment period, which will close on July 6, 2007. The four additional meetings will be held in June in: Phoenix, Arizona; Las Vegas, Nevada; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Rochester, New York. Dates and locations will be published in the Federal Register in the coming days. DOE previously announced it would host three public meetings at the

291

Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") in the above-captioned docket on February 17, 2006, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits these Comments to provide the DOE and all interested parties with the information regarding the DCPSC's recent efforts to facilitate compliance with the DOE directives issued in this proceeding and to ensure that adequate supplies of electricity continue to exist to serve our Nation's capital. Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission More Documents & Publications Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or,

292

Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") in the above-captioned docket on December 20, 2005 ("December 20 Order"), and Section 313 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), 16 U.S.C. § 8251, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits its preliminary comments on the compliance plan ("Compliance Plan") proposed by MiranT Potomac River,

293

Grid Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129 2010 Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129 2010 DOE RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy" Submitted by Grid Net, Inc. July 12, 2010 Attention: Maureen C. McLaughlin, Senior Legal Advisor to the General Counsel Grid Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129 2010 Summary and Highlights Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments for the Department of Energy RFI 2010-11129, our detailed responses to your questions are below for your consideration. The key points we'd like to get

294

Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Smart Grid » Smart Grid Smart Grid » Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments As part of its ongoing effort regarding the formation of smart grid policy, the Department of Energy issued a Request for Information in September of 2010 on the topic of "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." The purpose was to solicit comments from interested stakeholders on policy and logistical challenges that confront smart grid implementation, and recommendations on how to best overcome those challenges. The comments and recommendations will help inform the Department and the Administration's analysis of policy challenges and possible solutions being developed by the Smart Grid Subcommittee of the National Science and

295

City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of Energy Emergency Order, Operating Plan by Mirant and Proposed Special Environmental Analysis City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of Energy Emergency Order, Operating Plan by Mirant and Proposed Special Environmental Analysis Docket No. EO-05-01: The City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") hereby submits the following comments in response to the notice of emergency action published in the Federal Register on January 20, 2006 by the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") entitled "Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, V A, in Response to Electricity Reliability Concerns in Washington, D.C." (71 Fed.

296

Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment by Cameco Resources On Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (July 27, 2010), Section 934 Rule Making. As discussed below, Cameco believes that producers and providers of uranium concentrates and UF6 conversion services, whether directly or as an intermediary, should be excluded from the definition of nuclear supplier. In this regard, Cameco generally agrees with the comments submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute ("NEI") on behalf of its members; however, Cameco disagrees with the implication of NEl's comments that producers of uranium concentrates and providers of conversion services should be included in the

297

Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 November 17, 2005 - 2:49pm Addthis Workshop is first step to develop regulation for risk insurance for nuclear plants WASHINGTON, DC -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that a workshop to receive public comments on the "standby support" provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 has been scheduled for December 15, 2005. The workshop is the first step in developing a regulation for risk insurance for nuclear power plants and will be held from 8:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. and from 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. at the Marriott Residence Inn in Bethesda, Maryland. Standby support, or, "risk insurance," for new nuclear power plants is a

298

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials November 12, 2013 - 4:33pm Addthis Tim Jackson Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office The U.S. Department of Energy invites the public to read and comment on a draft environmental assessment it has prepared for a proposal to resume transient testing of nuclear fuels and materials at either Idaho National Laboratory (INL) or Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Transient testing involves placing fuel or material into the core of a nuclear reactor and subjecting it to short bursts of intense, high-power

299

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. The Alliance to Save Energy is a coalition of prominent business, government, environmental, and consumer leaders who promote the efficient use of energy worldwide to benefit consumers, the environment, economy, and national security. The Alliance to Save Energy (the Alliance) thanks the Department of Energy for the opportunity to comment on broad issues of policy and logistical challenges faced in smart grid implementation. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. More Documents & Publications

300

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available April 3, 2012 - 2:12pm Addthis On October 5, 2011, the White House announced the creation of a Rapid Response Team for Transmission (RRTT). In support of the RRTT the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability released a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. The Request for Information focused on making the development times for generation and transmission more commensurate with one another. Public comments received from the following organizations are now available for review and downloading. - Allegheny Highlands Alliance - American Electric Power

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community Relations Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Last saved on: 7/22/2011 Final CRP comment for June 2011 1 SECTION TEXT COMMENT POST? GENERAL COMMENTS N/A We urge the DOE, NNSA and LANL to establish a community calendar so that the various LANL organizations who are scheduling public meetings are aware of other community events, such as the public comment periods on various documents, including PMRs, semi-annual meetings (e.g., CMRR and storm water permit meetings), Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board meetings, RACER, New Mexico Community Foundation FEED meetings, tours, etc. Such a community calendar would be an efficient and effective way to reduce the back and forth about the need for extensions of time and requests to reschedule meetings. It

302

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment March 15, 2013 - 11:08am Addthis Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment DOE has issued the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS)(DOE/EIS-0472D) for public review and comment. The document is available here and on the ULP PEIS website. Under the Uranium Leasing Program, the DOE Office of Legacy Management administers 31 tracts of land in Mesa, Montrose, and San Miguel counties that are leased to private entities to mine uranium and vanadium. The program covers an area of approximately 25,000 acres. No mining operations are active on the ULP lands at this time. DOE is preparing the ULP PEIS to

303

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-07-02: Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") has reviewed the Special Environmental Analysis ("SEA") referenced above, dated November, 2006, and is providing the following brief comments for your consideration as the Department of Energy ("DOE") continues to evaluate the operating status of the Potomac River

304

Microsoft Word - AppendixH_CommentResponse.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NFSS Vicinity Property Report NFSS Vicinity Property Report October 2010 Doc. No. S06246 Page H-1 Responsiveness Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, New York: Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties and Two Drainage Ditches on April 23, 2010, for public comment. Report availability was announced through a message to stakeholders sent on behalf of DOE by USACE. The announcement provided a 30-day comment period, closing on March 19, 2010. DOE extended the comment period to June 14, 2010, in response to multiple requests for additional time to review FUSRAP documentation. Twenty comments were received, of which five were from one stakeholder and two from

305

Dockets Open for Public Comment | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

on how to submit your comments. Gasfin Development USA, LLC - FE Docket No. 13-161-LNG Application for Long-Term Authorization To Export Liquefied Natural Gas Produced From...

306

Comment on Vortex Liquid Crystal in Anisotropic Type II Superconductors  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by E.?W. Carlson, A.?H. Castro Neto, and D.?K. Campbell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 087001 (2003). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Xiao Hu and Qing-Hu Chen

2004-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

307

AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM CommentsDOE Reg Review Sept 2012FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg....

308

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

309

BPAI5_SupplementalCommentReport_FEB2011_FINALupdated  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

pointed out that Portland General Electric may use an existing right-of-way at the Pearl substation that BPA claims cannot be used for this project. Commenters also recommended...

310

Response to Comments Regarding EPAct 2005 Section 242: October 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document contains the response to comments that were received in regards to a revised draft of the EPAct 2005 Section 242 "Hydroelectric Incentive Program" Application Guidance that was released on October 20, 2014.

311

Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment for Installation of a Renewable Energy Anaerobic Digester Facility at the University of California, Davis in Yolo County, California.

312

Looking Forward: Comment on Morgante, Zolfaghari, and Johnson  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Looking Forward: Comment on Morgante, Zolfaghari, and Johnson Sarah C. Creel Department which use close-up viewing of the eye. Morgante, Zolfaghari, and Johnson (in press; henceforth MZJ

Kirsh, David

313

Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE published a Notice of Inquiry in the Federal Register (75 Fed. Reg. 43,945) requesting public comment on issues related to the funding obligations under the Convention on Supplementary...

314

Comment on "Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We comment on the recent claim for the experimental observation of neutrinoless double-beta decay. We discuss several limitations in the analysis provided in that paper and conclude that there is no basis for the presented claim.

C. E. Aalseth; F. T. Avignone III; A. Barabash; F. Boehm; R. L. Brodzinski; J. I. Collar; P. J. Doe; H. Ejiri; S. R. Elliott; E. Fiorini; R. J. Gaitskell; G. Gratta; R. Hazama; K. Kazkaz; G. S. King III; R. T. Kouzes; H. S. Miley; M. K. Moe; A. Morales; J. Morales; A. Piepke; R. G. H. Robertson; W. Tornow; P. Vogel; R. A. Warner; J. F. Wilkerson

2002-05-22T23:59:59.000Z

315

Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve the Potomac River Substation on January 9, 2006. Comments from the Virginia...

316

DOE Notice of inquiry and request for comment.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE is seeking comment and information from the public to assist in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Act). Section...

317

Microsoft Word - Comments received at White Rock Scoping Mtg...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

I would much rather comment on an EIS for a national laboratory for clean and renewable energy. 025 Jeanne Green The major question I have that needs to be addressed is the NEED...

318

DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead May 19, 2010 - 12:59pm Addthis Today the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register an interpretive rule that sets out the Department's views on the definition of "showerhead" in 10 CFR 430.2. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here. The draft interpretive rule clarifies that a showerhead is any plumbing fitting that is designed to direct water onto a bather regardless of the shape, size, placement, or number of sprays or openings that it may have. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Withdraws Interpretive Rule and Provides Enforcement Guidance on

319

Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies As part of its ongoing effort to assist in the formation of policies that will govern the integration of broadband technologies with the Smart Grid, the DOE General Counsel's office issued two Requests for Information (RFIs) in May of 2010. The first RFI was issued to solicit comments from electric utilities, consumer groups, and other stakeholders on ongoing federal, state, and private efforts to protect consumer energy usage data. The second RFI was issued to assist the Department in studying the present and future communications needs of electric utilities as Smart Grid technologies are deployed more broadly across the country. Smart Grid RFI Press Release (May 11, 2010)

320

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comments for modification of the Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry(NOI) by the Board of Mineral County Commissioners. The provisions covered by the current Act should, at the very least, be maintained. We are concerned that if the DOE Price-Anderson indemnification is not continued, we will not have the proper protection should a severe accident occur when spent nuclear fuel is transported through our community on its way to Yucca Mountain. The maintaining of the DOE PriceAnderson indemnification becomes even more important with the privatization of the OC RWM transportation program. DOE cannot expect private contractors, and in particular carriers, to be able to afford adequate coverage from a private insurer.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

NR-WFR Plan for Comment July 8 2013.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Monday, July 8, 2013 Monday, July 8, 2013 Bill Taylor - 803-952-8564 bill.taylor@srs.gov Public Comment Sought for Savannah River Site Workforce Restructuring Plan AIKEN, SC -- The Department of Energy Savannah River Site (DOE-SR) has posted a draft workforce restructuring plan for public comment. The draft workforce restructuring plan, prepared under Section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act, is designed to mitigate

322

EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada (DOE/EIS-0426). The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011 rather than October 27, 2011. EIS-0426-DEIS-CommentExtension-2011.pdf EIS-0426-DEIS-NoticeofCommentExtension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Comment Period

323

EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Period for the Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada (DOE/EIS-0426). The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011 rather than October 27, 2011. EIS-0426-DEIS-CommentExtension-2011.pdf EIS-0426-DEIS-NoticeofCommentExtension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Comment Period

324

Comments on the Spectrum of CHL Dyons  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We address a number of puzzles relating to the proposed formulae for the degeneracies of dyons in orbifold compactifications of the heterotic string to four dimensions with $N =4$ supersymmetry. The partition function for these dyons is given in terms of Siegel modular forms associated with genus-two Riemann surfaces. We point out a subtlety in demonstrating S-duality invariance of the resulting degeneracies and give a prescription that makes the invariance manifest. We show, using M-theory lift of string webs, that the genus-two contribution captures the degeneracy only if a specific irreducibility criterion is satisfied by the charges. Otherwise, in general there can be additional contributions from higher genus Riemann surfaces. We analyze the negative discriminant states predicted by the formula. We show that even though there are no big black holes in supergravity corresponding to these states, there are multi-centered particle-like configurations with subleading entropy in agreement with the microscopic prediction and our prescription for S-duality invariance. The existence of the states is moduli dependent and we exhibit the curves of marginal stability and comment on its relation to S-duality invariance.

Atish Dabholkar; Davide Gaiotto; Suresh Nampuri

2007-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

325

Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance- Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 177, September 12, 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy invites public comment on a draft of the Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance. Comments must be received on or before October 14, 2014.

326

Property:NEPA Resource Comment | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comment Comment Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA Resource Comment Property Type Text Description Comment on the analysis of a potential impact to a NEPA resource Subproperties This property has the following 4 subproperties: D DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091#NEPAImpact_with_Wild_Horse_and_Burro_Management DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091#NEPAImpact_with_Recreation DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091 DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091#NEPAImpact_with_Paleontological_Resources Pages using the property "NEPA Resource Comment" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Prime_or_Unique_Farmlands + The proposed project is not located in or near any prime or unique farmlands (BLM WFO 2002). BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Wilderness + The proposed project is not in or adjacent to any wilderness area (BLM WFO 2002).

327

University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry The University appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Inquiry (NOI) concerning preparation of a report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act. The NOI poses a number of questions that attempt to identify potential issues that might arise in developing the report. The University includes its general comments in this letter and offers its responses to the specific questions in an attachment. University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry More Documents & Publications Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of

328

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses. Editorial comments and general observations were considered, but are not listed in the responses below unless they involved a significant clarification to the DOE Challenge Home provisions. DOE is not responsible for any typographical errors or omissions.

329

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS May 28, 2013 - 5:37pm Addthis Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS The U.S. Department of Energy is re-opening the public comment period for the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft ULP PEIS, DOE/EIS-0472D). DOE made the Draft ULP PEIS available for public comment on March 15, 2013 (78 FR 16500). The public comment period for the Draft ULP PEIS originally was to end on May 16, 2013, and an extension to May 31, 2013 was announced on April 23, 2013 (78 FR 23926). In response to a public request for additional review time, DOE re-opens the public comment period, which will now close on July 1,

330

Renewable Northwest Comments on High-Level Indicators 1 October 31, 2014  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Renewable Northwest Comments on High-Level Indicators 1 October 31, 2014 VIA EMAIL Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act's Power Plan Goals Renewable Northwest appreciates (the "Act"). Our comments focus on the proposed metrics regarding renewable resource development

331

Reply to comment on Perfect drain for the Maxwell fish eye lens  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We reply to the comments on our paper Perfect Drain for the Maxwell fish eye lens (NJP 13 (2011) 023038) made by Fei Sun. We believe that Sun comments have several mistakes in theoretical concepts and simulation results.

Gonzalez, Juan C; Minnano, Juan C; Grabovickic, Dejan

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

Public Comment on the SEAB FracFocus 2.0 Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Written public comment on the SEAB FracFocus 2.0 Task Force report was accepted through March 26, 2014. The comments received are available for download below.

333

Comment submitted by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

334

Comment submitted by Hoshizaki America, Inc. regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by Hoshizaki America, Inc. regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

335

Comment submitted by Hobart/ITW Food Equipment Group regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by Hobart/ITW Food Equipment Group regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

336

Comment submitted by the Bradford White Corporation (BWC) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by the Bradford White Corporation (BWC) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

337

Comment submitted by BSH Home Appliances Corporation regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by BSH Home Appliances Corporation regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

338

Comment submitted by Energizer Battery Manufacturing, Inc. regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by Energizer Battery Manufacturing, Inc. regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

339

City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

City Utilities of Springfield Missouri provides comments in response to the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges

340

Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Now Available for Public Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy has issued a Notice of Public Comment in the Federal Register, inviting the public to comment on the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. The draft study is now available for review and downloading at http://www.energy.gov/node/942311. The public comment period will close on October 20, 2014. After reviewing and considering comments on the draft study, the Department will prepare and release a final version of the study.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Comment submitted by A. O. Smith Corporation regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by A. O. Smith Corporation regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

342

Comment submitted by the Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a comment submitted by the Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE) regarding the Energy Star Verification Testing Program

343

Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies The Media and Technology Institute and the Climate Change Initiative at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies ("Joint Center")1 respectfully submit these comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DoE") Request for Information regarding its implementation of the Smart Grid provisions of Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC") National Broadband Plan. Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Data Access Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy- Request for

344

Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (-NRECA‖) is the national service organization representing more than 900 not-for-profit, member-owned, member-controlled rural electric Cooperatives (-Cooperatives‖). Most of NRECA's members are distribution Cooperatives, providing retail electric service to more than 42 million consumers in 47 states. NRECA members also include approximately 65 generation and transmission (-G&T‖) Cooperatives that supply wholesale

345

Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. ("On-Ramp") hereby submits comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") May 11, 2010 Request for Information as to the communications needs of electric utilities to inform federal Smart Grid policy. In these comments, On-Ramp addresses two vital aspects of the need for wireless communications in connection with Smart Grid-more specifically, for customer smart meters and devices and for certain types of distribution grid system monitoring. First, On-Ramp discusses the need to reliably link millions of customer meters and home area networks with each other and with utility access points. Second, On-Ramp discusses the importance of efficiently addressing

346

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). In the Department of Energy"s (DOE) attempt to meet its obligation to implement Executive Order 13563, ""Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,"" issued by the President on January 18, 2011, I recommend DOE make a bold move to change

347

Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. ("Southern"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE's") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, about current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities.1 Southern appreciates the opportunity to provide DOE with additional information and to respond to the initial comments submitted in this proceeding. As discussed more fully below, Southern believes that privately-owned and operated systems will continue to be needed for command and control operations. In addition, Southern is not opposed to using some commercial services for non-mission critical

348

Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy Corridors in the West Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy Corridors in the West October 21, 2005 - 9:27am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that it and several other federal agencies will host eleven public meetings to discuss the designation of multi-purpose energy corridors on federal lands in the western United States. "As our nation grows, so do our energy needs. So we must be forward looking as we map out energy transmission corridors in order to get energy to places that need it," Director of DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Kevin Kolevar said. "We want to make sure that

349

West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment March 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor (513) 246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov West Valley, New York - The U.S. Department of Energy today released a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation of a vitrification melter at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) for review and comment by the public, states and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This draft evaluation shows that the melter meets the criteria for "waste incidental to reprocessing" and may be managed and disposed of as low-level radioactive waste (LLW). It is an important step in DOE's efforts to clean up the WVDP and meet its obligations under the WVDP Act of

350

Comments of the American Public Power Association | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Power Association Public Power Association Comments of the American Public Power Association In response to the U.S. Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") published May 11, 2010 in the Federal Register,1 the American Public Power Association ("APPA") hereby submits its comments in response to questions on data access, third party use, and privacy as related to the implementation of smart grid technology. Comments of the American Public Power Association More Documents & Publications Response to Request for Information from the Department of Energy: Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy [FR Doc. 2010-11127] July 12, 2010 Responses by CPower, Inc. to DOE RFI

351

Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Southern Company Services, Inc., for itself and on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and its other affiliates (collectively, "Southern"), is pleased to have this opportunity to provide responses to questions contained in the Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information

352

Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Department of Energy's Emergency on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Docket No. EO-05-01: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., submits the following comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) February 17 Order for Rehearing Emergency Order 202-05-3. District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01, Order No. 202-06-01 (Dep't of Energy, Feb. 17, 2006). Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To

353

Reply Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Verizon and Verizon Wireless Verizon and Verizon Wireless Reply Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless As Verizon noted in its opening comments in response to the Department of Energy's Request for Information (RFI), effective communications networks and services are critical to the success of Smart Grid technology. Existing commercial broadband networks built and operated by experienced communications providers would best facilitate the implementation of Smart Grid technology, which requires the highly secure transmission and processing of vast amounts of information to and from consumers and electricity producers and distributors. As evidenced by comments submitted in this proceeding, established communications providers not only are capable of meeting the communications needs of the utility sector as Smart Grid technology is implemented -

354

Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy More Documents & Publications

355

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Price-Anderson Act comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act 62 Federal Register 250. Universities Research Association, Inc. (URA) is a nonprofit corporation consisting of 87 member research universities located in the United States, Canada, Japan, and Italy.This Association strongly supports the continuation of the provisions of the Price-Anderson Act for DOE contractors and suppliers, including the exemption of Fermilab, among other named DOE national laboratories, from the payment of civil penalties under that Act. It is our experience at Fermilab that a few subcontractors/suppliers expect Price-Anderson protection and will not contract with the Laboratory without it.

356

Comments on Smart Grid data access | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

on Smart Grid data access on Smart Grid data access Comments on Smart Grid data access AARP, NASUCA, NCLC, Consumers Union and Public Citizen just released, "The Need for Essential Consumer Protections: Smart Metering Proposals and the Move to Time-Based Pricing." This white paper covers a range of issues including previous smart meter pilot programs, full costs associated with advanced meters and related infrastructure, and impacts of dynamic pricing on vulnerable customer groups. The paper includes 7 recommendations. Comments on Smart Grid data access More Documents & Publications AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges The Need for Essential Consumer Protections: Smart Metering Proposals and

357

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Preparation of Report to Congress on Price-Anderson Act. The Price Anderson Act should be eliminated. The Price Anderson Act assumes that the encouragement and growth of the commercial nuclear industry is in the public interest. It is not. Rational evaluation of the commercial nuclear industry forces the conclusion that the Price Anderson Act simply shields the commercial nuclear industry from costs that it would otherwise, in a fair market setting, be forced to internalize and pay. Price Anderson amounts to corporate welfare that has already caused a massive disruption of energy markets, and the abusiveness enabled by this welfare system threatens to dislodge society from its ecological as

358

Comments of Dakota Electric Association | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Dakota Electric Association Comments of Dakota Electric Association Comments of Dakota Electric Association DEA has deployed a fully integrated IP network to 26 substation sites. An IP based network transports data information for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Load Management systems. A private Wide Area Network (WAN) was implemented by DEA in 2001 due to lack of comprehensive coverage by major carriers. In addition to the WAN, DEA relies on commercial services to communicate with load management receivers via paging technology and smart meters via phone lines. The rural environment, which covers a significant portion of our service area, and substations in particular present challenges. Carriers and telephone companies build to mass markets not the more rural area Even in

359

Currently there are no comments for this news story. Be the first to comment! Leaving comments does not require an email address. However, registered users have more options and can protect their comments with a password. The Oregon Herald makes no claim  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

natural and manmade disasters. For example, a robot could enter a building to turn off a gas leakCurrently there are no comments for this news story. Be the first to comment! Leaving comments does-commercial, ad free, daily news publication updated every hour SCIENCE NEWS (More) Darpa Taps Winners In Virtual

Stryk, Oskar von

360

Microsoft Word - eia_elect_form_change_comments_2013  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May 6, 2013 Ms. Rebecca Peterson Energy Information Administration EI-23 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington D.C. 20585 RE: Comments on Energy Information Administration (EIA) Agency Information Collection Extension with Proposed Changes Dear Ms. Peterson: The National Mining Association (NMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on EIA's electricity information collection 3-year extension and proposed changes (Federal Register Notice, March 6, 2013, Volume 78, No. 44, Page 14521). NMA represents the interests of the nation's coal and non-fuel mineral producers; coal and mineral transporters; mining and mineral processing machinery and equipment manufacturers and suppliers;

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

COMMENTS OF THE DEMAND RESPONSE AND SMART GRID COALITION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 COMMENTS OF THE DEMAND RESPONSE AND SMART GRID COALITION Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy July 12, 2010 The Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition (DRSG) 1 , the trade association for companies that provide products and services in the areas of demand response and smart grid technologies, respectfully submits its comments to the Department of Energy's Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy."

362

Microsoft Word - Qualcomm Comments on DOE NBP RFI v.2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DC 20585 DC 20585 In the Matter of National Broadband Plan (NBP) RFI: Communications Requirements COMMENTS OF QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Dean R. Brenner Vice President, Government Affairs John W. Kuzin Senior Director, Regulatory 1730 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 850 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 263-0020 Dated: July 12, 2010 SUMMARY Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the Federal

363

National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy invites public comment on the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study.

364

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of area - Height of proposal - Light - daylight/sunlight - On-street parking Comment:4 Walton Street application will deprive the south side of the street of light to a far greater degree than is at present Address: Former Ruskin College Site Walton Street Oxford Oxfordshire Proposal: Redevelopment of existing

Flynn, E. Victor

365

Response Submittal to the EPA Enclosure 1 EPA Comment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

due to oil deposits beneath the WIPP site, there may not exist a reliable barrier to the migration to the EPA Enclosure 1 EPA Comment 1-G-3 Inventory As outlined in the Executive Summary of DOE/TRU-2008-3379, Rev. 1 (ATWIR 2007), DOE has proposed that ATWIR 2008 be used as the inventory source document if EPA

366

Comment on "Optimal Reaction Time for Surface-Mediated Diffusion"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In recent letter [Phys. Rev. Lett {\\bf 105}, 150606 (2010)], the surface-mediated diffusion problem is theoretically discussed, and interesting results have been obtained. However, for more general cases, the ansatz of solutions of the diffusion equation, which is the starting point of their analysis, might not be appropriate. In this comment, suggested ansatz and corresponding methods will be presented.

Yunxin Zhang

2011-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

367

NOTE AND COMMENT Liza S. Comita Gregory R. Goldsmith  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NOTE AND COMMENT Liza S. Comita ? Gregory R. Goldsmith Stephen P. Hubbell Intensive research-re- lated disturbance between events, leaving little or no L. S. Comita Department of Plant Biology of Panama L. S. Comita (&) Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University

Goldsmith, Greg

368

Comments on "Cooling by Heating: Refrigerator Powered by Photons"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We comment that the model proposed in Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 120603 (2012) violates the dynamical version of the third law of thermodynamics. We discuses the different formulations of the third law of thermodynamics and suggest a possible reason for the violation.

Amikam Levy; Robert Alicki; Ronnie Kosloff

2012-08-13T23:59:59.000Z

369

October 18, 2002 comment@bpa.gov Stephen J. Wright  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 October 18, 2002 comment@bpa.gov Stephen J. Wright Administrator Bonneville Power Administration that BPA should apply to exclude some smelters from "qualifying" for the base allocation. For anti that "to the extent that BPA acquires the output [of an incremental generating resource] so offered", a DSI

370

Reply to "Comment on 'Hadronic production of thermal photons'"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We address a recent comment by Alam [Phys. Rev. C 71, 059802 (2005)], on our work of thermal photon emission rates from hadronic matter. Specifically, we explain how t-channel omega exchange in the pi rho ->pi gamma reaction arises as a dominant...

Turbide, S.; Rapp, Ralf; Gale, C.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

COMMENTS ON IIA STOCHASTIC MODEL OF ELECTRON CYCLOTRON HEATINGII  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

OF ELECTRON CYCLOTRON HEATING" In an earlier paper, GRAWE (1969) proposed a theoretical model which is often of the observed heating is that it is a cyclotron resonance phenomenon involving the fundamental and harmonicsCOMMENTS ON IIA STOCHASTIC MODEL OF ELECTRON CYCLOTRON HEATINGII J. C. Sprott · October 1974 Plasma

Sprott, Julien Clinton

372

Representation Systems and Undergraduate Proof Production: A Comment on Weber  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Representation Systems and Undergraduate Proof Production: A Comment on Weber Lara Alcock & Matthew proof production occurs when much of the prover's work takes place [outside] the representation system systems involved in undergraduate proof production. We discuss these issues further below. However, we

Inglis, Matthew

373

Predicting Community Preference of Comments on the Social Web  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

x LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 A Youtube video page titled ?The Obama Plan in 4 Minutes? ............. 3... Figure 2 A Flickr photo page titled ?For love, hope, faith, and life? ................... 4 Figure 3 Part of the comments for the Youtube video ?The Obama Plan in 4 Minutes...

Hsu, Chiao-Fang

2010-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

374

ccsd00000548 COMMENTS ON "MEASURING THE GRAVITY SPEED BY VLBI"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ccsd­00000548 (version 1) : 18 Aug 2003 COMMENTS ON "MEASURING THE GRAVITY SPEED BY VLBI" H. ASADA the light speed. Such a di#11;erence may play a vital role in the primordial universe. In recent, Kopeikin and Fomalont claimed the #12;rst measurement of the gravity speed by VLBI. However, the measurement has

375

DOE Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries DOE Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries February 21, 2013 - 2:35pm Addthis DOE's Grid Tech Team issued a notice of availability and request for comments on the Electrical Grid Integration Technical Workshop summaries. Public comments on summaries from the distribution system and transmission system workshops will be accepted until March 25, 2013. The complete Federal Register Notice, including details on how to submit comments, is available for download. Addthis Related Articles DOE Convenes Multi-stakeholder Process to Address Privacy for Data Enabled by Smart Grid Technologies Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring

376

BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NEWS RELEASE Release Date: 04/15/11 Contacts: David Quick, (202) 912-7413 BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) today announced a two-week extension of the public comment period for the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Solar PEIS), a joint effort with the Department of Energy. The agencies had previously provided for a 120-day public comment period on the Draft Solar PEIS. Because of numerous requests, the agencies are extending the comment period by an additional two weeks beyond April 16, 2011. The comment period will now run until May 2, 2011. No additional public meetings will be held during the

377

GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comment on Application (Optional) Comment on Application (Optional) < GRR‎ | Elements Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections 14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) The DOGGR Regional Board receives the option to comment on the application prior to the issuance of a Draft Project Approval Letter for review. The DOGGR Regional Board shall furnish any comments to the DOGGR State Board within 14 days of the applicant submitting the application. Logic Chain No Parents \V/ GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) (this page) \V/ No Dependents Under Development Add.png Add an Element Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6_-_Comment_on_Application_(Optional)&oldid=539608

378

Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is re-opening the public comment period for proposed amendments to its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), made available for public comment on January 3, 2011 (76 FR 214). This is being done in response to a request on behalf of multiple organizations CX rulemaking files More Documents & Publications Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Federal Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico

379

Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No. 99-1 Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No. 99-1 Ontario Power Generation hereby moves to intervene in, and comments on, the DOE's proposed open access requirements for International Electric Transmission Facilities. Ontario Power Company Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No. 99-1 More Documents & Publications Motion to Intervene and Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Joint Motion to Intervene of Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) et

380

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY The Michigan Public Service Commission Staff (MPSC Staff) commends the Department of Energy for seeking comments on policy and challenges confronting smart grid deployments as stated in the Request for Information (RFI) addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act Comments from the State of Nevada on the December 31, 1997 Federal Register "Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act." Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act More Documents & Publications Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comments of the Western Interstate Energy Board's High-Level Radioactive Waste Committee on the Department of Energy Office of General Counsel's Notice of Inquiry concerning the preparation of a report to Congress on the

382

Independent commentators repeatedly cited Solyndra as an innovative and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

commentators repeatedly cited Solyndra as an innovative and commentators repeatedly cited Solyndra as an innovative and promising company: San Jose Mercury News: "Fremont's Solyndra goes from stealth to solar star" October 6, 2008 Richard Branson, the billionaire entrepreneur and adventurer, thinks Solyndra has a good idea. Branson's Virgin Green Fund got pitches from 117 solar companies but invested in only one, Solyndra, said Anup Jacob, a partner in the fund's San Francisco office. "They have the potential to become the next great energy company," he said. San Francisco Chronicle: "A bright idea for solar power; Fremont startup's innovative format saves time and space" October 7, 2008 University and government researchers have tinkered with solar cylinders before, said Daniel

383

Comments of Space Data Corporation | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Space Data Corporation Space Data Corporation Comments of Space Data Corporation Space Data is the leader in high altitude balloon borne communications platforms where between 65-100,000 feet we have flown over 20,000 commercial SkySite® flights totaling over 250,000 flight hours as well as supply the military with our StarFighter® platform which extends 2 way radio communications from under 10 miles to over 400 miles. We were founded in 1999 and to develop our technology we decided that the ReFlex paging protocol was appropriate and that FCC licensed spectrum was available. Hence we participated in FCC Auctions 40, 41 and 50 and through secondary market transactions accumulated almost 2 of the 3 MHz allocated to Narrowband PCS (NPCS) in the 901/930/940 MHz bands. Comments of Space Data Corporation

384

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These comments are submitted on behalf of the National Association of State These comments are submitted on behalf of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) in response to the request for information (RFI) of the Department of Energy (DOE) entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26206 (May 11, 2010).1 NASUCA is a voluntary organization comprised of offices from 40 states and the District of Columbia, charged by their respective state laws to represent utility consumers before federal and state utility regulatory commissions, before other federal and state agencies, and before federal and state courts. Many NASUCA members have extensive experience with regulatory policies governing the utility

385

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") hereby submits the following comments in response to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26203 (May 11, 2010). The RFI requests comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding current and potential practices and policies for the states and other entities to empower consumers, and perhaps others, through access to detailed energy information in electronic form-including real-time information from smart meters, historical consumption data, and pricing and billing information.

386

COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S RAPID RESPONSE TEAM FOR TRANSMISSION'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Submitted by electronic mail to: Lamont.Jackson@hq.doe.gov The Large-scale Solar Association appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Rapid Response Team for Transmission's (RRTT) Request for Information. 1 We applaud the DOE for creating the RRTT and continuing to advance the efforts already made under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) entered into by nine Federal agencies in 2009 to expedite electric transmission construction. We also applaud the federal and state agencies that have expanded the Renewable Energy Policy Group and the Renewable Energy Action Team in California to focus on transmission, and hope that the tremendous

387

Microsoft Word - DOE Comments-Nov1rev.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Before the Before the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY WASHINGTON, DC Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy ) and Logistical Challenges ) to Smart Grid Implementation ) COMMENTS OF THE CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY AND THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION: IMPLEMENTING THE FIPS IN THE SMART GRID I. Introduction The Center for Democracy & Technology ("CDT") 1 and the Electronic Frontier Foundation ("EFF") 2 are pleased to file these comments in response to the September 17, 2010 Request for Information ("RFI") on "policy and logistical challenges that confront smart grid implementation, as well as recommendations on how to best overcome those challenges." 3 The RFI focuses in part on the effects on consumers of the implementation of the smart

388

DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental Impact  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Uranium Program Environmental Uranium Program Environmental Impact Statement DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental Impact Statement April 18, 2013 - 1:08pm Addthis Contractor, Bob Darr, S.M. Stoller Corporation Public Affairs, (720) 377-9672, ULinfo@lm.doe.gov GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that the public comment period for the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS) has been extended to May 31, 2013. Under the Uranium Leasing Program, DOE's Office of Legacy Management manages 31 tracts of land in Mesa, Montrose, and San Miguel counties in Colorado - approximately 25,000 acres - that are leased to private entities for uranium and vanadium mining. No mining operations are active

389

Microsoft Word - REMA Comments EIA_Agency_Info_Collection.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 600 * Washington, DC 20036-2701 1 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 600 * Washington, DC 20036-2701 202-640-6597 tel * 202-223-5537 fax * www.renewablemarketers.org Submitted via: ERS2014@eia.gov May 6, 2013 Ms. Rebecca Peterson U.S. Energy Information Administration Mail Shop EI-23 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Comments of the Renewable Energy Markets Association on the Energy Information Administration's Agency Information Collection Extension Dear Ms. Peterson: The Renewable Energy Markets Association (REMA) is pleased to submit the following recommendations and comments in response to the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) call for improved industry data collection. REMA is a North American trade association dedicated to maintaining and growing strong

390

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Infrastructure Program Transmission Infrastructure Program Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228-8213 Via email: txprogram@wapa.gov April 3, 2009 Re: Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments regarding the implementation of section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 74 Fed. Reg. 9391-9393 (Mar. 4, 2009). Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of Horizon Wind Energy LLC ("Horizon"), I am pleased to submit comments on Western Area Power Administration ('Western')'s proposed implementation of section 402 of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009. Horizon develops, constructs, owns and operates wind farms throughout North America. Based

391

DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Definition of Showerhead Definition of Showerhead DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead May 19, 2010 - 12:59pm Addthis Today the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register an interpretive rule that sets out the Department's views on the definition of "showerhead" in 10 CFR 430.2. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here. The draft interpretive rule clarifies that a showerhead is any plumbing fitting that is designed to direct water onto a bather regardless of the shape, size, placement, or number of sprays or openings that it may have. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Withdraws Interpretive Rule and Provides Enforcement Guidance on

392

Microsoft Word - WBRT_Comments_WAPA_TIP_FINAL.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Blvd, #105 | Lakewood, Colo. 80228 | 303-384-9911 f: 303-496-0334 Blvd, #105 | Lakewood, Colo. 80228 | 303-384-9911 f: 303-496-0334 info@westernroundtable.com | www.westernroundtable.com The opinions expressed in this letter represent the views of a majority of Roundtable Members, but not necessarily all of our members. April 3, 2009 Transmission Infrastructure Program Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Re: Western Area Power Administration's ("WAPA") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments on its adoption of a Transmission Infrastructure Program Dear Sir/Madam: The Western Business Roundtable ("Roundtable") is responding to Western Area Power Administration's ("WAPA") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments on

393

Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ORNL Tech transfer.txt ORNL Tech transfer.txt From: Doug Lawyer [dlawyer@knoxvillechamber.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:40 PM To: GC-62 Cc: Rhonda Rice Subject: Comments on ORNL Tech transfer Attachments: image001.jpg I understand that DOE is accepting comments on technology transfer initiatives in your federal national labs. Here's some thoughts on tech transfer at ORNL: * One of the key economic development strategies of Knox County, Tennessee, which sits in a region we call The Innovation Valley, involves Technology transfer from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is a focus of our daily economic development efforts through a program we call Technology Mining and Matching. We have a strong connection with ORNL and its partnerships division. * During the eight years that UT-Battelle LLC has managed ORNL, we

394

Comments of Space Data Corporation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Space Data Corporation Space Data Corporation Comments of Space Data Corporation Space Data is the leader in high altitude balloon borne communications platforms where between 65-100,000 feet we have flown over 20,000 commercial SkySite® flights totaling over 250,000 flight hours as well as supply the military with our StarFighter® platform which extends 2 way radio communications from under 10 miles to over 400 miles. We were founded in 1999 and to develop our technology we decided that the ReFlex paging protocol was appropriate and that FCC licensed spectrum was available. Hence we participated in FCC Auctions 40, 41 and 50 and through secondary market transactions accumulated almost 2 of the 3 MHz allocated to Narrowband PCS (NPCS) in the 901/930/940 MHz bands. Comments of Space Data Corporation

395

Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from The National Association of Regulatory Utility from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on this Request for Information (RFI) regarding the policy and logistical challenges of the smart grid. The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). More Documents & Publications RE: NBP RFI: Data Access In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid; Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy, 75 Federal Register 33611 (June 14, 2010).

396

Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan Docket No. EO-05-01: Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy's December 20, 2005 Emergency Order 202-05-3 and on Mirant's proposed Compliance Plan filed pursuant to that Order. Dep't of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA, in Response to Electricity Reliability Concerns in Washington, D.C., 71 Fed. Reg. 3279 (Jan. 20, 2006).

397

Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ORNL Tech transfer.txt ORNL Tech transfer.txt From: Doug Lawyer [dlawyer@knoxvillechamber.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:40 PM To: GC-62 Cc: Rhonda Rice Subject: Comments on ORNL Tech transfer Attachments: image001.jpg I understand that DOE is accepting comments on technology transfer initiatives in your federal national labs. Here's some thoughts on tech transfer at ORNL: * One of the key economic development strategies of Knox County, Tennessee, which sits in a region we call The Innovation Valley, involves Technology transfer from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is a focus of our daily economic development efforts through a program we call Technology Mining and Matching. We have a strong connection with ORNL and its partnerships division. * During the eight years that UT-Battelle LLC has managed ORNL, we

398

Microsoft Word - DOE Comment Letter.FINAL.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

/ 6 / 6 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 312 Washington, DC 20001-2075 Telephone: 202-662-9535 TDD: 202-662-9538 Fax: 202-662-9634 January 8, 2006 Anthony J. Como SEA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Comments on Department of Energy's Special Environmental Analysis Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA Dear Mr. Como: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy's November 2006 Special Environmental Analysis

399

20120131 DOE Congestion Study Clean Line Comments 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY 2012 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CONGESTION STUDY COMMENTS OF CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS LLC January 31, 2012 Clean Line Energy Partners LLC ("Clean Line") respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Plan for Conduct of 2012 Electric Transmission Congestion Study ("Congestion Study") as published in the Federal Register on November 11, 2011. Clean Line appreciates the DOE's renewed efforts to gather and review existing and new transmission data across the nation (as per 76 FR 70122) to develop a list of congestion areas that may be eligible for backstop authority under 216a of the Federal Power

400

Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities On behalf of Allegheny Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Monongahela Power Company, The Potomac Edison Company and West Penn Power Company, all doing business as Allegheny Power; Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company; and PATH Allegheny Transmission Company, LLC (collectively, the "Allegheny Energy Companies"), the following comments are submitted in accordance with the September 19, 2008 Department of Energy ("DOE") announcement of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities and opportunity for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

EIS-0369: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting EIS-0369: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridor and Rail Alignment The Department of Energy is now announcing an additional public meeting in Reno, Nevada and the public comment period also is being extended through December 12, 2006 for the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridot and Rail Alignment Environmental Impact Statement. Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting for the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridot and Rail Alignment Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0369) (November 2006 - 71 FR 65785) More Documents & Publications EIS-0250: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public

402

Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Section 214 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's ("Commission") Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.214, and the Notice of Filing issued in this proceeding on August 25, 2005, the City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") moves to intervene and provides the following comments in this proceeding. Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan

403

EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico In response to requests for additional time to review and comment on the document, NNSA is extending the public comment period until September 20, 2006. DOE/EIS-0380, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 76 FR 40352 (August 2006) More Documents & Publications EIS-0380: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental

404

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 More Documents & Publications FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS

405

Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Environmental Justice Interagency Working Group Community Dialogue Anchorage, AK February 7-11, 2011 The EJ IWG conducted 18 community dialogues across the country from February 2011 to November 2011. Comments and concerns of the community were recorded at each meeting. The IWG's commitment was that its agency partners would provide responses to communities about the concerns that were raised during these meetings. Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment More Documents & Publications

406

DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, May 25, 2010 DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, May 25, 2010 DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request. The DOE shares your commitment to providing taxpayers and the public with timely reporting on the progress of Recovery Act projects. DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, May 25, 2010 More Documents & Publications Comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 100, Tuesday, May 25,

407

RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal's core technology is the ability to understand the access control of the network as a whole - not simply the behavior of a single device. RedSeal analyzes the interactions of firewalls, routers and load balancers network wide to determine the traffic allowed between every two points. RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. More Documents & Publications Southern Company: DOE Smart Grid RFI Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI

408

WIPP SEIS-II - Comment Response Supplement, Volume II (Part 1 of 24)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

II II Public Comments September 1997 Department of Energy Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico This Document Printed on Recycled Paper COMMENT RESPONSE SUPPLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TC-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME II PUBLIC COMMENTS Agency Comments...............................................................................................PC - 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Region 6 (A-001) .......................................PC - 3 State of New Mexico Environment Department (A-002)............................................PC - 4 State of Texas: Office of the Governor (A-003) .....................................................PC - 6 State of Ohio: Office of the Governor (A-004).......................................................PC - 6 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (A-005)

409

Public Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Security Act of 2007 Comments by the United States Enrichrnent Corporation (USEC) in response to DOE's Notice of Inquiry (N0l) on the Convention on Supplementary...

410

Comment on "Quantum Time Crystals": a new paradigm or just another proposal of perpetuum mobile?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A Comment on Frank Wilczek's paper "Quantum Time Crystals" (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012); arXiv:1202.2539).

Patrick Bruno

2012-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

411

Comment on Transition from Normal to Fast Sound in Liquid Water  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by F. Sette, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 83 (1996). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

J. L. Martinez; F. J. Bermejo; A. Criado; M. Alvarez; S. M. Bennington

1997-02-03T23:59:59.000Z

412

Comment on Coulomb Explosion Patterns of Fast C60 Clusters in Solids  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by You-Nian Wang, Hua-Tan Qiu, and Z. L. Miskovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1448 (2000).

Santiago Heredia-Avalos; Cristian D. Denton; Rafael Garcia-Molina; Isabel Abril

2002-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

413

Comment on Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by M. Rupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 058301 (2012). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Jonathan E. Moussa

2012-08-03T23:59:59.000Z

414

Some Comments on James Watt's Published Account of His Work on Steam and Steam Engines  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

1 June 1971 research-article Some Comments on James Watt's Published Account of His Work on Steam and Steam Engines W. A. Smeaton

1971-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

ENERGYSOLUTIONS' Comment in Response to Notice of Inquiry, Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945

416

Comment on Indications of a T=0 Quantum Phase Transition in SrTiO3  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by Daniel E. Grupp and Allen M. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3511 (1997). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Mario Maglione

1998-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

417

Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts : Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 4, Comments and Responses.  

SciTech Connect

This volume of the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) contains public comments addressing the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Draft EIS, August 1990 and Bonneville Power Administration`s (BPA) responses. The Introduction provides information about the process BPA follows in addressing these comments. Part I contains a listing of the Alternative Actions evaluated in the Final EIS; Part II is organized by Alternatives and includes summaries of the comments and BPA responses; Part III provides copies of the original comments letters, and, for ease of identification, are coded in the margins according to the alternative(s) addressed.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

Comment on Rntgen Quantum Phase Shift: A Semiclassical Local Electrodynamical Effect?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by S.?A.?R. Horsley and M. Babiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010405 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

S. C. Tiwari

2005-12-08T23:59:59.000Z

419

Comment on Finite Heat Conduction in a 2D Disorder Lattice  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by Lei Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 094301 (2002). The author of the Letter offers a Reply.

Bambi Hu; Bai-Qi Jin; Lei Wang; Hongliu Yang

2003-03-21T23:59:59.000Z

420

Comment on "Analysis of quantum coherent semiconductor quantum dot p-i-n junction photovoltaic cells"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This is a comment on PRL paper by A.P. Kirk "Analysis of quantum coherent semiconductor quantum dot p-i-n junction photovoltaic cells"

Scully, Marlan O

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Comments About The Impact of Federal Technology Transfer on the Commercialization Process  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Much has been said about technology transfer and little about technology commercialization. My comments will focus on the commercialization of public sector technology by industry.

James P. Wilhelm

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.  

SciTech Connect

This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled Energy Conservation Program: Energy...

424

Comparing Comments in the L1 and the L2 during the Peer Review Process.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This study analyzes the use of ESL students L1 and L2 during the peer review process in terms of the number of comments and suggestions (more)

Myers, Terra Suzanne

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

AFFECT Notice of Intent June 27, 2013 CO and Legal Comments July 3, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document details the Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies (AFFECT) Notice of Intent on June 27, 2013 and the legal comments on July 3, 2013.

426

Comment on Doping Driven (?, 0) Nesting and Magnetic Properties of Fe1+xTe Superconductors  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by Myung Joon Han and Sergey Y. Savrasov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 067001 (2009). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Prabhakar P. Singh

2010-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

427

EIS-0299: Notice of Extension of Comment Period for the Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Extension of Comment Period for the Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Production of Plutonium-238 for Use in Advanced Radioisotope Power Systems for Future...

428

Comment on Anomalous Hall Effect in YBa2Cu3O7  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by Branko P. Stojkovi? and David, Pines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 811 (1996). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

N. P. Ong and P. W. Anderson

1997-02-03T23:59:59.000Z

429

Comment on Spectroscopic Signatures of Novel Oxygen-Defect Complexes in Stoichiometrically Controlled CdSe  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by G. Chen etal., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 195502 (2008). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

L. Zhang; J. T-Thienprasert; M.-H. Du; D. J. Singh; S. Limpijumnong

2009-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

430

Comment on Minimal Energy Cost for Thermodynamic Information Processing: Measurement and Information Erasure  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by Takahiro Sagawa and Masahito Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 250602 (2009). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Raoul Dillenschneider and Eric Lutz

2010-05-14T23:59:59.000Z

431

Comments and Amended Request for Extension of Order No. 202-05...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy Order No. 202-07-02 Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant...

432

Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference- Comments and Recommendations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

December 16, 2003 Electric System Working Group Technical Conference, Philadelphia PA - Summary of comments and recommendations relating to the aftermath of the August 2003 blackout.

433

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR LEASE OF LAND AND FACILITIES AT THE EAST TENNESSEE TECENOLOGY PARK OAK RIDGE,TENNESSEE @OE/EA-1175) NOVEMBER 1997. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE [blank page] CONTENTS 1 1 . INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 2. SCOPE AND ORGANIZATIONS ................................................... 3 3. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES .i ................................................. 5 3.1 DOE NEPA Review Process/Categorical Exclusions .............................. 5 3.1.1 SummaryofComments ............................................... 5 3.1.2 Response/Revisions .................................................. 5

434

LEBLOND, PH, AND TR PARSONS. Reply to comment by WE Ricker  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

IBP Handbook 17. Black- well. Reply to comment by ... The purpose of the manual of Edmondson and ... ficient) and does not form a valid basis for calculation of...

2000-01-08T23:59:59.000Z

435

Energy Efficiency Program for Residential Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dishwashers, Reopening of the Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Efficiency Program for Residential Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dishwashers, Reopening of the Comment Period

436

Comment response document for the Secretary of Energy`s ``Report to Congress on Reassessment of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program``  

SciTech Connect

On November 29, 1989, the Secretary of Energy published his ``Report to Congress on the Reassessment of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program`` (Report), and sent copies to numerous interested parties for their review and comment. This document summarizes comments received on the Report and presents the DOE`s current responses to those comments as a basis for further discussions. Included as appendixes are a list of commenters, a crosswalk showing where each comment is addressed, the comment letters themselves with specific comments delineated, and the DOE`s response to those letters. Twenty-five individuals or organizations submitted comments on the Report. The DOE identified 130 individual comments and classified them into the following seven categories: Management, Institutional, Regulatory, Transportation, Monitored Retrievable Storage, Scheduling, and Yucca Mountain. For the responses, comments were than grouped into more specific topics under each of the major headings. The DOE attempted to respond to all comments.

NONE

1990-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 2:36 PM To: comment@bpa.gov  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

RD-0232 Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 2:36 PM To: comment@bpa.gov Subject: FW: Fish, Wildlife regarding BPA's operation of the Federal Hydropower System and on Bonneville's current and future obligations to fish and wildlife. My comments will focus on five main points: 1. BPA can meet its obligations

438

Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 4:40 PM To: comment@bpa.gov  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

RD-0144 Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 4:40 PM To: comment@bpa.gov Subject: renewable energy to offer my comments. BPA has tremendous power to steer our destructive consumerist society towards a world where air, water and soil are clean, yet people have the energy they need. I would like the BPA to take

439

Public Comments in Response to the November 10, 2011 Federal Register Notice  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the current National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE requested comments on what publicly-available data and information should be considered, and what types of analysis should be performed to identify and understand the significance and character of transmission congestion. The following public comments were received as of March 30, 2012.

440

Comments on 10 CFR 820, 830, 835 proposed safety rules for DOE nuclear activities  

SciTech Connect

The objective of this paper was a discussion of LANL`s comments to draft 10CFR 820, 830, and 835. In general comments, LANL recognized the authority of the governing organization but contended that: (1) the rules/approach needed major revision, (2) the rules are counterproductive, and (3) teamwork is reg`d in order to meet the goals.

Bergman, G. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States)

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Response to Comment on "Fate of Rising CO2 Droplets in Seawater"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Response to Comment on "Fate of Rising CO2 Droplets in Seawater" I welcome the comment by Alendal is greater than ambient seawater so that CO2 liquid would sink and gradually dissolve in seawater." Alendal by which ocean storage could produce a disaster like that at Lake Nyos". The IPCC report (4

Zhang, Youxue

442

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study- Draft for Public Comment August 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. The draft study is available for review and downloading.

443

Reply to 'Comment on 'Insensitivity of Hawking radiation to an invariant Planck-scale cutoff''  

SciTech Connect

We clarify the relationship between the conclusions of the previous Comment of A. Helfer [A. Helfer, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. D 81, 108501 (2010)] and that of our Brief Report [I. Agullo, J. Navarro-Salas, G. J. Olmo, and L. Parker, Phys. Rev. D 80, 047503 (2009).].

Agullo, Ivan; Parker, Leonard [Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 (United States); Navarro-Salas, Jose [Departamento de Fisica Teorica and IFIC, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC, Facultad de Fisica, Universidad de Valencia, Burjassot-46100, Valencia (Spain); Olmo, Gonzalo J. [Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid (Spain); Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 (United States)

2010-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

444

Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information (RFI) regarding the "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges." The North American Electric Reliability Corporation's ("NERC") Reliability Assessment and Performance Analysis Group ("RAPA") is currently developing a report, entitled "Reliability Consideration from Integration of Smart Grid" that will address many of the issues raised in the DOE RFI. North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)

445

Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wireless Wireless Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless As the Department of Energy (DOE) correctly notes, Smart Grid technology holds significant promise in improving "the reliability, availability, and efficiency of the electric system." The benefits of developing and deploying Smart Grid technology include reduced energy costs, increased security, enhanced durability, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. But effective communications networks and services are critical to the success of Smart Grid technology. For Smart Grids to function properly, vast amounts of information must be transmitted and processed to and from consumers and electricity producers and distributors, with high levels of security as that data transmission and processing takes place.

446

Microsoft Word - ELCON Comments on Letterhead 05-02-13  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May 2, 2013 May 2, 2013 Ms. Rebecca Peterson U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Energy Information Administration Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via email to ERS2014@eia.gov Re: EIA Form Collection Extension with Changes, 78 Fed. Reg. 14521 (Mar. 6, 2013) Dear Ms. Peterson: The Electricity Consumers Resource Council ("ELCON") appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed information collection of the U.S. Energy Information Administration ("EIA") referenced above, and in particular on the "Annual Electric Generator Report," Form EIA-860, with proposed changes. ELCON is the national association representing large industrial consumers of electricity. ELCON

447

Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 15. 2011 April 15. 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Via Email: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Subject: Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 Dear Mr. Cohen: The American Gas Association (AGA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject Department of Energy ("the Department") Request for Information (RFI) seeking comment and information to assist it in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether such regulations should be modified or repealed pursuant to Executive Order 13563 ("Improving

448

Microsoft Word - WAPA Trans. Comment Extension Request.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA VERMILLION, SOUTH DAKOTA 100 FIRST STREET SW, SUITE 201 CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52404 T: 319 362 2120 F: 866 484 2372 E: info@plainsjustice.org W: http://plainjustice.org Printed on recycled paper Transmission Infrastructure Program Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228- 8213 March 25, 2009 To Whom It May Concern: Intertribal Council on Utility Policy, Dakota Resource Council, Native Action, Plains Justice and Western Organization of Resource Councils write to request an extension to the thirty (30) day comment period and additional opportunities for public hearing on WAPA's Notice of proposed principles, policies and practices for a Transmission Infrastructure Program. Notice

449

Comment on Macroscopic Test of the Aharonov-Bohm Effect  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this Comment it is shown that it cannot be argued that in the magnetic AB effect there is no force acting on the particle, i.e., that the observed phase shift is entirely due to nonzero vector potential. In stationary resistive conductors carrying constant currents there are quasistatic surface charges, which generate not only the electric field inside the wire driving the current, but also a static electric field outside it. These external static electric fields have nothing to do with Boyer's force picture and with his result for the existence of a time delay.

Tomislav Ivezic

2014-06-04T23:59:59.000Z

450

Comment on Air Emissions Due to Wind and Solar Power  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Comment on Air Emissions Due to Wind and Solar Power ... Energy Analysis Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 ... This work was funded by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Wind & Hydropower Technologies Program and Solar Energy Technologies Program) and by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division) of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Contract DE-AC36-08-GO28308 with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. ...

Andrew Mills; Ryan Wiser; Michael Milligan; Mark OMalley

2009-07-07T23:59:59.000Z

451

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

452

EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Extension of Comment Period Notice of Extension of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the previously published May 13, 2005 to January 5, 2006. Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing its Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration EIS under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). BPA is currently considering a proposed interconnection requested by PPM Energy, Inc. (PPM), to integrate electrical power from their proposed Klondike III Wind Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Bonneville Power Administration Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project Notice of Comment Period, DOE/EIS-0374 (December 2005 - 70 FR

453

DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act August 18, 2010 - 4:33pm Addthis Today, in response to a formal request, General Counsel Scott Blake Harris approved a 30-day extension of the public comment period on DOE's Notice of Inquiry (75 FR 43945) soliciting comment on the development of regulations to carry out section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which implements the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage. The public comment period will be extended to October 27, 2010. The signed extension which is provided here, will be published shortly in the Federal Register. Addthis Related Articles DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy

454

Comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway White Papers | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway White Papers Comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway White Papers Home > Groups > Water Power Forum Feedback Welcome: The Water Power Program welcomes comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway white paper products from the MHK community. Comments will be used for the Program's internal purposes and DOE is not obligated to provide a response to comments. Please provide your feedback regarding the content of the white papers via this Forum. Cost Reduction Pathways White Papers: The U.S. Department of Energy's Water Power Program is seeking to demonstrate the technical and economic opportunity of marine and hydrokinetic (MHK) technologies. As part of this process, Sandia National Laboratories, in partnership with the Water Power Program, developed four white papers to identify and address critical cost drivers, and

455

Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04 Potomac River Generating Station Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04 Potomac River Generating Station Docket No. EO-05-01: On behalf of Mirant Potomac River LLC ("Mirant"), we respectfully request the opportunity to respond to certain written comments received by the Department of Energy in connection with the Department's Special Environmental Analysis dated November 2006 (DOE/SEA-04, the "SEA")) regarding DOE Order 202-05-03 ("DOE Order"), as extended by DOE Order 202-06-2 and DOE Order 202-06-2A, concerning the operations of the Potomac River Generating Station (the "Plant"). Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04

456

Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments from Southern California Edison on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy More Documents & Publications Re: U.S. Department of Energy Request for Information Implementing the

457

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply comments by the ad hoc Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group (the "Group") in response to various comments submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy on its Federal Register "Notice of Inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act" of December 31, 1997. 62 Fed.Reg. 68272. The Group is comprised of comprised of Bechtel National, Inc., BNFL, Inc., BWX Technologies, Inc., Duke Engineering & Services, Inc., Fluor Corporation, Johnson Controls World Services Corporation, Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, Nuclear Fuel Services,

458

Public invited to comment on additional proposed modications to WIPP hazardous waste permit  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications To WIPP Hazardous Waste Permit CARLSBAD, N.M., April 26, 2000 - The public is invited to comment on additional proposed modifications to the hazardous waste facility permit for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Earlier this month, DOE and the Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division requested -- through three Class 2 permit modification submittals -- that the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) change certain provisions of the state permit. On April 20, DOE and Westinghouse submitted to NMED three additional Class 2 permit modifications. The Class 2 submittals begin a formal review process that includes a 60-day public comment period and two separate public meetings. Written comments will be accepted by

459

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. On September 25, the public comment period was extended to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's G&T Cooperatives, sent September 25, 2013

460

Motion to Intervene and Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit Motion to Intervene and Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit A motion to intervene and comments from Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit, where DOE proposes to amend certain presidential permits including one held by the District and export authorizations to add a requirement that the permittees provide open access transmission services on their international transmission lines. Public Utility District No. 1 (Washington State) Comments on PP 99-1 Notice

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Comments from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia Supporting the Comments from the City of Alexandria on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia Supporting the Comments from the City of Alexandria on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No. EO-05-01: I wish to add my voice to the comments submitted on behalf of the City of Alexandria by its legal counsel John B. Britton of Schnader Harrison Segal and Lewis LLP and City Attorney, Ignacio B. Pessoa, and offer my additional comments on the Tuesday, December 20th order governing future operations of the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (Docket No. EO-05-0 1). I would especially like to emphasize that all

462

Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Report to  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price Anderson Act Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price Anderson Act Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE's December 31, 1997 Federal Register "Notice of inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act." Comments focus on the following three ideas. First, we strongly support extension of the indemnification protections of the Act. Second, Battelle supports the continuing interest in contractor accountability for nuclear safety compliance, though we believe that contractors have always been, and remain, accountable through contractual provisions and we do not believe

463

Supplemental Comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") Supplemental Comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel is Ohio's statutory residential utility consumer advocate, empowered under Chapter 4911 of the Ohio Revised Code to represent the interests of Ohio residential utility consumers in proceedings before state and federal administrative agencies and courts. Supplemental Comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") More Documents & Publications Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation: Comments by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates

464

Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of Energy on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of Energy on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI)

465

Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments of AT&T Inc. Comments of AT&T Inc. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates ("AT&T"), respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department Of Energy"s Request for Information ("RFI") on the communications requirements of utilities. AT&T supports DOE"s efforts and coordination with various Federal, State and private initiatives to implement the Smart Grid. We appreciate the opportunity to inform federal Smart Grid policy by participating in DOE"s examination of the communications requirements of electric utilities deploying Smart Grid capabilities in their networks. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc.

466

Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. On January 5, 2009, ITC Transmission filed with the Department of Energy a request to amend Presidential Permit PP-230-3, which authorizes ITC to own and operate specified electric transmission facilities at the Bunce Creek station that interconnect ITC with Hydro One Networks Inc electric transmission facilities at the Michigan-Ontario border. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. More Documents & Publications Application for presidential permit OE Docket No. PP-230-4 International Transmission Company: Response of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. to Answer of

467

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates ("AT&T"), respectfully submits these reply comments in response to the Department Of Energy"s Request for Information ("RFI") on the communications requirements of electric utilities in Smart Grid deployments.1 In its initial comments, AT&T highlighted the expanding demand for network connectivity and how utilities can benefit from leveraging new network technologies deployed by commercial communications operators to optimize the performance, scalability, security, reliability and cost effectiveness of their Smart Grid applications deployments. Commercial communications

468

Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid The undersigned members of the natural gas industry are pleased to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (Sep. 17, 2010). The Request seeks comment on challenges that confront smart grid implementation and recommendations on how best to overcome those challenges. We believe abundant, domestic, low-carbon natural gas resources along with

469

Comments to the Feb 06 FRN received after March 9, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Comments to the DOE Federal Register Notice of Inquiry (NOI) on Considerations for Transmission Congestion Study and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Final Addendum - Additional Comments Received after March 9, 2006 The following material comprises the addendum to the comments received by DOE in response to the Federal Register Notice of Inquiry [FR Doc. E6-1394] issued on February 2, 2006. This notice solicited comment and information from the public concerning its plans for an electric transmission congestion study and possible designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (''NIETCs'') in a report based on the study pursuant to section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Through this Notice of Inquiry, DOE invited comment on

470

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Honeywell comment on regulatory policy issues that need to be considered, and on implementation challenges and opportunities critical to deploying Smart Grid systems. Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Honeywell Responses To Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of Energy on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities To Inform Federal Smart

471

EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension for Time for Comments Extension for Time for Comments EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology In response to a public request, the Department of Energy (DOE) announces an extension of time to submit comments on the preferred technology announced August 3, 2005 in the Federal Register Notice of Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology (70 FR 44598) to September 21, 2005. DOE/EIS-0287, Extension for Time for Comments, Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Notice of Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology, 70 FR 49264 (August 2005) More Documents & Publications EIS-0287: Notice of Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2005

472

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

473

EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

74: Notice of Extension of Comment Period 74: Notice of Extension of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the previously published May 13, 2005 to January 5, 2006. Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing its Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration EIS under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). BPA is currently considering a proposed interconnection requested by PPM Energy, Inc. (PPM), to integrate electrical power from their proposed Klondike III Wind Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Bonneville Power Administration Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project Notice of Comment Period, DOE/EIS-0374 (December 2005 - 70 FR

474

Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Letter from Electrolux to Department of Energy General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Electrolux sumitted comments on re-testing, re-certification, and re-rating of large-capacity residential clothes washers tested with alternative procedures under a waiver situation. Elextrolux requested a waiver and interim waivers for large-capacity. Electrrolux addressed the General Counsel's specific question on retesting and stated that so long as the manufacturer documents that it has tested the products in accordance with the actual basket volume

475

EIS-0250: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting EIS-0250: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, NV Based on input from the public, DOE is now announcing an additional public meeting in Reno, Nevada. The public comment period also is being extended through December 12, 2006. Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting on the Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada, DOE/EIS-0250 (71 FR 65786) (November 2006) More Documents & Publications

476

Comments received on the plan presented at the March 29, 2006 conference  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Comments to the U.S. Department of Energy on the Plan Presented at the March 29, 2006, Public Technical Conference on the Transmission Congestion Study Plan and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETCs) The following material comprises comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy in response to a request at the March 29, 2006, Public Technical Conference on the Transmission Congestion Study Plan and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETCs) held at the Hilton Garden Inn O'Hare Airport. These comments were received via e- mail to EPACT1221@hq.doe.gov. It was requested that all comments be submitted by close-of- business Friday, April 14, 2006. The U.S. Department of Energy presents the comments as received and without any endorsement

477

EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing Draft Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOE has extended the comment period for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemential EIS through October 10 and announces an additional Public Hearing in Espanola, NM. EIS-0283-S2-CommentExtension-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0312: Notice of Availability of the Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision UDAC Meeting - January 2012 Electricity Advisory Committee Notice of Open Meeting October 2 and 3, 2013: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 176 - September 11, 2013

478

EIS-0396: Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments EIS-0396: Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments Global Nuclear Energy Partnership In response to public requests, the Department of Energy (DOE) announces an extension of time to submit comments on the proposed scope, alternatives, and environmental issues to be analyzed in the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP PEIS). Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments on the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, DOE/EIS-0396 (April 2007) 72 FR 15871 More Documents & Publications EIS-0359: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement Analysis EIS-0360: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement Analysis

479

Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules February 17, 2011 - 5:29pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announced that, in response to requests from a number of parties, it has re-opened the public comment period on its proposed revisions to the Department's NEPA rules. The public comment period will be extended three weeks and will now close on March 7, 2011. DOE, on January 3, 2011, issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to amend its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The proposals focus primarily on the Department's categorical exclusion provisions, and reflect the first update to these provisions in

480

Joint comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company on notice of proposed amendment. FE Docket No. 99-1 Joint comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company on notice of proposed amendment. FE Docket No. 99-1 Pursuant to the department of energy's notice of proposed amendment to presidential permits and export authorizations and delegation and assignment to the federal energy regulatory commission, announced in the federal register on July 27, 1999, Consumers Energy Company and The Detriot Edison Company hereby submit the following comments. Joint comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company on notice of proposed amendment. FE Docket No. 99-1 More Documents & Publications Motion to intervene of Consumers Energy Company. FE Docket No. 99-1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

ISSUANCE 2015-01-26: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for High-Intensity Lamps, Notice to Reopen Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for High-Intensity Lamps, Notice to Reopen Comment Period

482

Microsoft Word - o435.1Chg1Recertification.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

line denotes change. line denotes change. Distribution: Initiated By: All Departmental Elements Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 7-9-99 Change 1: 8-28-01 Certified: 1-9-07 SUBJECT: RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 1. OBJECTIVE. The objective of this Order is to ensure that all Department of Energy (DOE) radioactive waste is managed in a manner that is protective of worker and public health and safety, and the environment. 2. CANCELLATION. This Order cancels DOE 5820.2A, RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT, dated 9-26-88. Cancellation of that Order does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any contractual obligation to comply with the Order. The provisions of this canceled Order which have been incorporated by reference in a contract shall

483

NEW - DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 2, Conduct of Operations  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The objective of this Order is to define the requirements for establishing and implementing Conduct of Operations Programs at Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), facilities and projects. A Conduct of Operations Program consists of formal documentation, practices, and actions implementing disciplined and structured operations that support mission success and promote worker, public, and environmental protection. The goal is to minimize the likelihood and consequences of human fallibility or technical and organizational system failures. Conduct of Operations is one of the safety management programs recognized in the Nuclear Safety Rule [Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management], but it also supports safety and mission success for a wide range of hazardous, complex, or mission-critical operations, and some conduct of operations attributes can enhance even routine operations. It supports the Integrated Safety Management (ISM) System by providing concrete techniques and practices to implement the ISM Core Functions of Develop and Implement Hazard Controls and Perform Work Within Controls. It may be implemented through facility policies, directives, plans, and safety management systems and need not be a stand-alone program.

484

Microsoft Word - o420 1bChg1Final4-19-10  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

accompanying program entitled DDESB Blast Effects Computer (BEC), Version 6.1. (6) DOETIC-11268, Manual for the Prediction of Blast and Fragment Loading for Structures, (July...

485

The following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Sol  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's request for information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden" in the spirit of Executive Order 13563 ---- It is ironic that the response interval for the RFI on reducing regulatory burden overlaps the issuance of the Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment; Final Rule [the enforcement rule]. That rule

486

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide04 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide04 Founding Agencies in 2001 * Department of Agriculture * Department of Commerce * Department of Defense * Department of Education * Department of Energy * Department of Health and Human Services * Department of Interior * Environmental Protection Agency * National Aeronautics and Space Administration * National Science Foundation New Alliance Members * Department of Transportation * Library of Congress * United States Government Printing Office * National Archives and Records Administration Alliance only * United States Forest Service * National Institute of Standards and Technology Support and coordination by CENDI - an interagency forum of senior information managers Add new comment

487

Microsoft Word - Smart_Grid_Comments_NAF_11.1.10.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative submitted to U.S. Department of Energy regarding Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation November 1, 2010 The New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative ("NAF") respectfully submits these comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information (RFI) entitled "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." 1 NAF will address the following sections in the RFI: * Definition and Scope * Interactions With and Implications for Consumers * Assessing and Allocating Costs and Benefits * Utilities, Device Manufacturers and Energy Management Firms

488

Comment Response for DOE O 475.2B, Identifying Classified Information  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This draft has been scheduled for final review before the Directives Review Board on 8-21-14. All major comments and concerns should be provided to your DRB representative, following your organization process. If you do not know who your representative is, please see the list of DRB members at https://www.directives.doe.gov/beta/references/directives-review-board. If your office is represented by Ingrid Kolb, Director, Office of Management, please submit your major concerns and comments to the DRB Liaison, Camille Beben (Camille.Beben@hq.doe.gov; 202-586-1014). All major comments and concerns should be submitted by COB 8-19-2014.

489

NOTES AND COMMENTS REVERE COPPER AR! BRASS DETROIT, MICHIGAN  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

* .t-* * .t-* . * * - -. _ _ ,.. .I AIT. 4 NOTES AND COMMENTS REVERE COPPER AR! BRASS DETROIT, MICHIGAN A preliminary (screening) survey was conducted in several areas of the Revere Copper and Brass Facility, 5851 W. Jefferson Street, Detroit, Michigan. The survey was conducted by the ANL Radiological Survey Group on April 22, 1981. The Survey Group, consisting of W. Smith, R. Mundis, K. Flynn (all of ANI), and E. Jascewsky (DOE-CH) met on site with J. Evans (Safety Engineer), D. Tratt (Asst. Engineer), -- M~37~se'Zanak~(Aeth6ds~De!@iFXi%itXiupe~isox$ and E. Betancourt (Personnel Manager) to discuss what information was available concerning the operations that transpired at the facility during the Manhattan Engineering District Atomic Energy Commission (MED/AEC) era. MrYWtisffaliab indicated that

490

Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless on DOE Request for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wireless on DOE Request for Wireless on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy The development and deployment of smart grid technology hold tremendous promise towards improving the efficiency and reliability of our nation's energy systems and empowering consumers to make better decisions about the use of electricity. Because effective communications networks will be central to the success of smart grid technology, Verizon is working closely with utilities, the developers of energy management systems, and others to

491

Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47328 47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its

492

Comments of East Central Energy- Minnesota | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

East Central Energy- Minnesota East Central Energy- Minnesota Comments of East Central Energy- Minnesota Because of the lack of ubiquitous coverage by major carriers or operating telephone companies, East Central Energy has contracted with our G&T, Great River Energy for private wireless services to our substations. No single vendor or combination of several vendors could provide an integrated solution Great River Energy has deployed a fully integrated IP network to 36 of ECE's remote sites of our electric system. The IP network transports data information for SCADA and AMR; metering information. We also use this network to perform maintenance on substation control equipment. The rural environment and substation in particular present challenges. Carriers and telephone companies build to mass markets. Substations are

493

Microsoft Word - DOE comments privacy - 7-6 _2_.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF VERIZON AND VERIZON WIRELESS The development and deployment of smart grid technology hold tremendous promise towards improving the efficiency and reliability of our nation's energy systems and empowering consumers to make better decisions about the use of electricity. Because effective communications networks will be central to the success of smart grid technology, Verizon is working closely with utilities, the developers of energy management systems, and others to use its extensive wireline and wireless broadband networks and related expertise to quickly and efficiently realize the promise of smart grid

494

Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Section 1221(a) of EPAct 2005, which added section 216(h) to the Federal Power Act, stated that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to coordinate all Federal authorizations and related environmental reviews needed for siting interstate electric transmission projects, including National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) reviews. The purpose of this coordination is to streamline agencies' review processes and avoid duplication among Federal agencies. Section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act

495

Gen IV public comments-G Vine.PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Generation IV Goals and Roadmap Generation IV Goals and Roadmap Public meeting, Thursday, Nov. 16, 2000 JW Marriott, Washington DC Gary Vine, EPRI I'd like to cite two regulatory landmarks established during the U.S. DOE/Industry ALWR Program, 1983-98, the intent of which should be incorporated into the goal setting for all future reactors. These are followed by four specific comments on the Generation IV goals. A. ALWR goals are Industry goals, and must be kept distinct from regulatory requirements. The ALWR Program was very careful to maintain and preserve clear separation between regulatory requirements and industry goals, as expressed in the EPRI ALWR Utility Requirements Document. The industry needed to decide how to comply with regulations in the most cost-effective way, and needed to strategically design-in the extra margins needed for investment protection, operational

496

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines. Tips: Laundry DOE Solicits Views on the Implementation of Large-Capacity Clothes Washer

497

EIS-0283-S2-CommentExtension-2012.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2012 / Notices and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding. The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number. eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at: http:// www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing- req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. Dated: August 29, 2012. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.

498

Microsoft Word - Comments to EIA on Form 861.docx  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

TO: Howard Gruenspecht, Acting Administrator TO: Howard Gruenspecht, Acting Administrator Stephen Harvey, Assistant Administrator for Energy Statistics Stan Kaplan, Office Director Carolyn Moses, Project Manager, 826 and 861 Surveys U.S. Energy Information Agency FROM: Hilary Forster, Patrick Wallace, and Nicolas Dahlberg Evaluation and Research Team Consortium for Energy Efficiency SUBJECT: Suggestions for Modifications to Schedule 6 (Demand Side Management) of Form EIA-861 (2011) for 2013 Version of the Form DATE: April 29, 2013 I am writing in response to the opportunity to comment on the proposed Form EIA-861, "Annual Electric Power Industry Report". CEE is a consortium of energy efficiency program administrators from across the U.S. and Canada who work together on common approaches to advancing efficiency. CEE's members

499

Microsoft Word - RRTT RFI - FINAL EEI Comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mr. Lamont Jackson Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Lamont.Jackson@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Rapid Response Team for Transmission Request for Information, RRTT-IR-01, 77 Fed. Reg. 11517 (Feb. 27, 2012) Dear Mr. Jackson: I. INTRODUCTION The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the questions raised in the above-referenced Department of Energy (DOE) Request for Information (RFI) regarding Federal efforts to address the issue of "incongruent development timelines" for the siting and permitting of electricity generation and attendant transmission.

500

DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 14, 2010 - 10:17am October 14, 2010 - 10:17am Addthis Today, in response to a formal request, General Counsel Scott Blake Harris approved a second and final extension of the public comment period to November 30, 2010 on DOE's Notice of Inquiry (75 FR 43945) soliciting comment on the development of regulations to carry out section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which implements the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage. The original deadline of September 27, 2010 was extended to October 27, 2010 (75 FR 51986) in response to public comment. The signed extension provided here will be published shortly in the Federal Register. Addthis Related Articles DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act