Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

DOE O 3750.1 Chg 6, Work Force Discipline  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order provides guidance and procedures and states responsibilities for maintaining work force discipline in DOE. Chg 1, dated 3-11-85; Chg 2, dated ...

1983-03-23T23:59:59.000Z

2

Bulk Hauling Equipment for CHG  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BULK HAULING EQUIPMENT FOR CHG BULK HAULING EQUIPMENT FOR CHG Don Baldwin Director of Product Development - Hexagon Lincoln HEXAGON LINCOLN TITAN(tm) Module System Compressed Hydrogen Gas * Capacity 250 bar - 616 kg 350 bar - 809 kg 540 bar - 1155 kg * Gross Vehicle Weight (with prime mover) 250 bar - 28 450 kg 350 bar - 30 820 kg 540 bar - 39 440 kg * Purchase Cost 250 bar - $510,000 350 bar - $633,750 540 bar - $1,100,000 Compressed Natural Gas * Capacity (250 bar at 15 C) - 7412 kg * GVW (With prime mover) - 35 250 kg * Purchase Cost (+/- 5%) - $510,000 HEXAGON LINCOLN TITAN(tm) V Magnum Trailer System Compressed Hydrogen Gas * Capacity 250 bar - 800 kg 350 bar - 1050 kg 540 bar - 1500 kg * Gross Vehicle Weight (with prime mover) 250 bar - 31 000 kg 350 bar - 34 200 kg 540 bar - 45 700 kg * Purchase Cost (+/-

3

Property:Incentive/CodeChgCycle | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

CodeChgCycle CodeChgCycle Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/CodeChgCycle Property Type Text Description Code Change Cycle. Pages using the property "Incentive/CodeChgCycle" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B Building Energy Code (Alabama) + No set schedule. Most recent update effective October 1, 2012 Building Energy Code (Alaska) + No set schedule. Most recent update effective: March 9, 2011 Building Energy Code (Arizona) + No set schedule. Arizona is a home rule state and legislation is the normal route through which changes in the energy code proceed. Building Energy Code (Arkansas) + No set schedule. Most recent residential update effective: October 1, 2004. Building Energy Code (California) + Three-year code change cycle. The 2008 Standards took effect January 1, 2010. The 2012 Standards are scheduled to take effect in 2014.

4

DOE O 580.1A Admin Chg 1, Department of Energy Personal Property Management Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order sets forth requirements for personal property management and accountability. Adm Chg 1 dated 10-22-12.

2012-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

5

DOE M 205.1-3 Admin Chg 1, Telecommunications Security Manual  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

For distribution, please contact Samuel Soley at 301-903-9992. Cancels DOE M 200.1-1. Admin Chg 12-20-12

2006-04-17T23:59:59.000Z

6

DOE O 456.1 Admin Chg 1, The Safe Handling of Unbound Engineered Nanoparticles  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes requirements and assigns responsibilities for activities involving unbound engineered nanoparticles (UNP). Cancels DOE N 456.1. Admin Chg ...

2011-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

7

DOE O 350.1 Chg 4, Contractor Human Resource Management Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This directive establishes DOE responsibilities and requirements for the management and oversight of contractor Human Resource Management (HR) programs. Chg 1, ...

1996-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

8

DOE O 470.4B Admin Chg 1, Safeguards and Security Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes responsibilities and program planning and management requirements for the Safeguards and Security Program. Admin Chg 1, dated 2-15-13.

2011-07-21T23:59:59.000Z

9

CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc (CHG) Information Resource Management (IRM) Strategic Plan  

SciTech Connect

The CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. (CHG), Information Resource Management Strategic Plan is the top-level planning document for applying information and information resource management to achieve the CHG mission for the management of the River Protection Project waste tank farm.

NELSON, R.L.

2000-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

10

DOE O 252.1A Admin Chg 1, Technical Standards Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes the DOE Technical Standards Program. Cancels DOE O 252.1 and DOE G 252.1-1. Admin Chg 1 dated 3-12-13.

2011-02-23T23:59:59.000Z

11

Microsoft Word - o144 1AdmChg1Clean11-9-09  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Intergovernmental and Tribal Affairs U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 1-16-09 Admin Chg 1: 11-6-09 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBAL...

12

CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc (CHG) Information Resource Management (IRM) Strategic Plan  

SciTech Connect

The CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., Information Resource Management Strategic Plan is the top-level planning document for applying information and information resource management to achieve the CHG mission for the management of the River Protection Project

NELSON, R.L.

2000-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

13

DOE O 414.1D Admin Chg 1, Quality Assurance  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order defines roles and responsibilities for providing quality assurance for DOE products and services. Cancels DOE O 414.1C. Admin Chg 1 dated 5-8-13.

2011-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

14

DOE M 471.3-1 Admin Chg 1, Manual for Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 471.3. Admin Chg 1 dated 1-13-11. No cancellation.

2003-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

15

Microsoft Word - o481.1c FinalAdminChg1 3-14-11  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81.1C Chg. 1 81.1C Chg. 1 03-14-11 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO DOE O 481.1C, WORK FOR OTHERS (NON-DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FUNDED WORK) LOCATION OF CHANGES: Page Paragraph Changed To 7 5.f(1) "intelligence and intelligence-related WFO projects and intelligence SAPs." "intelligence and intelligence- related work and intelligence SAPs." 7 5.f(2) "intelligence-related WFO projects" "intelligence and intelligence- related work" 7 5.f(3) "intelligence-related WFO projects" "intelligence and intelligence- related work" 7 5.f(4) "intelligence-related WFO" "intelligence and intelligence-

16

Microsoft Word - o420 1bChg1Final4-19-10  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

https://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 12-22-05 Review: 12-22-07 Chg. 1: 4-19-10 SUBJECT: FACILITY SAFETY 1. OBJECTIVES. To establish facility and programmatic safety requirements for Department of Energy (DOE), including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), for- a. nuclear and explosives safety design criteria, b. fire protection, c. criticality safety, d. natural phenomena hazards (NPH) mitigation, and e. the System Engineer Program. 2. CANCELLATION. This Order cancels DOE O 420.1A, Facility Safety, dated 05-20-02. Cancellation of an Order does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any contractual obligation to comply with such an Order. Contractor requirements documents (CRDs)

17

Microsoft Word - o580.1Chg1Final5-8-08.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Management U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 12-7-05 Chg 1: 5-8-08 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PERSONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1. OBJECTIVES. To set forth the following: a. Standards, practices, and performance expectations for the management of personal property owned by the Department of Energy (DOE). (Terms and definitions used in this Order can be referenced in the Guide, DOE G 580.1-1, Department of Energy Personal Property Management Guide, dated 12-7-05.) b. Responsibilities for development, administration, application, and oversight of the DOE personal property management program. 2. CANCELLATIONS. None. 3. APPLICABILITY. a. DOE Elements. This Order applies to all DOE elements with personal property

18

Microsoft Word - o144 1AdmChg1Clean11-9-09  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Intergovernmental and Tribal Affairs Intergovernmental and Tribal Affairs U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 1-16-09 Admin Chg 1: 11-6-09 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENT INTERACTIONS AND POLICY 1. PURPOSE. This Order communicates Departmental, programmatic, and field responsibilities for interacting with American Indian Governments and transmits the Department of Energy's (DOE) American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Government Policy (hereafter "Indian Policy") including its guiding principles, and transmits the Framework for Implementation of the Policy. 2. CANCELLATION. DOE O 1230.2, American Indian Tribal Government Policy, dated 4-8-92. Cancellation of a directive does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any

19

COMMENTS OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coordination of Federal ) Authorizations for Electric ) 10 CFR Part 900 Transmission Facilities ) (RIN 1901-AB18) COMMENTS OF THE STAFF OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE INTERIM FINAL RULE INTRODUCTION The Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ("CPUC") hereby provides its comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Interim Final Rule on Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities, which was published in the Federal Register on Friday, September 19, 2008. The CPUC is a constitutionally established agency charged with the responsibility for regulating electric corporations within the State of California. In

20

m035.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 (2045) I (J P ) = 1 2 (4 + ) K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045± 9 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 2062± 14± 13 1 ASTON 86 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 2039± 10 400 2,3 CLELAND 82 SPEC ± 50 K + p → K 0 S π ± p 2070 + 100 - 40 4 ASTON 81C LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2079± 7 431 TORRES 86 MPSF 400 p A → 4K X 2088± 20 650 BAUBILLIER 82 HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 S π - p 2115± 46 488 CARMONY 77 HBC 0 9 K + d → K + π 's X 1 From a fit to all moments. 2 From a fit to 8 moments. 3 Number of events evaluated by us. 4 From energy-independent partial-wave analysis. K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 198± 30 OUR AVERAGE 198±

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

m030.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

30 30 h 1 (1170) I G (J PC ) = 0 - (1 + - ) h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS NODE=M030M NODE=M030M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1168 ± 4 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n OCCUR=2 1166 ± 5 ± 3 1 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 1190 ± 60 2 DANKOWY... 81 SPEC 0 8 π p → 3π n 1 Average and spread of values using 2 variants of the model of BOWLER 75. NODE=M030M;LINKAGE=B 2 Uses the model of BOWLER 75. NODE=M030M;LINKAGE=C h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH NODE=M030W NODE=M030W VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360 ± 40 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← * * * We do not use the following data for averages,

22

m028.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

270) 270) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272± 7 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 2 datablocks that follow this one. PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1275± 10 1275± 10 1275± 10 1275± 10 700 GAVILLET 78 HBC + 4.2 K - p → Ξ - (K π π) + PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1270± 10 1270± 10 1270±

23

m030.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

170) 170) I G (J PC ) = 0 - (1 + - ) h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS h 1 (1170) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 1170± 20 OUR ESTIMATE * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1168± 4 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 1166± 5± 3 1 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 1190± 60 2 DANKOWY... 81 SPEC 0 8 π p → 3π n 1 Average and spread of values using 2 variants of the model of BOWLER 75. 2 Uses the model of BOWLER 75. h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH h 1 (1170) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE 360± 40 OUR ESTIMATE * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 345± 6 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 375± 6± 34 3 ANDO 92 SPEC 8 π - p → π + π - π 0 n 320± 50 4 DANKOWY... 81 SPEC 0 8 π

24

m099.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 (1650) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry contains various peaks in strange meson systems (K + φ, K π π) reported in partial-wave analysis in the 1600-1900 mass re- gion. K 1 (1650) MASS K 1 (1650) MASS K 1 (1650) MASS K 1 (1650) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1650± 50 1650± 50 1650± 50 1650± 50 FRAME 86 OMEG + 13 K + p → φK + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 1840 ARMSTRONG 83 OMEG - 18.5 K - p → 3K p ∼ 1800 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p K 1 (1650) WIDTH K 1 (1650) WIDTH K 1 (1650) WIDTH K 1 (1650) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 150± 50 150± 50 150± 50 150± 50 FRAME 86 OMEG + 13 K + p → φK + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 250 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES K 1 (1650) DECAY MODES Mode Γ 1 K π π Γ 2 K φ K 1

25

b131.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

370) 370) I (J P ) = 1 2 (? ? ) J, P need confirmation. Status: ∗∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Ξ (2370) MASS Ξ (2370) MASS Ξ (2370) MASS Ξ (2370) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 2370 OUR ESTIMATE 2356± 10 JENKINS 83 MPS - K - p → K + MM 2370 50 HASSALL 81 HBC -0 K - p 6.5 GeV/c 2373± 8 94 AMIRZADEH 80 HBC -0 K - p 8.25 GeV/c 2392± 27 DIBIANCA 75 DBC Ξ 2π Ξ (2370) WIDTH Ξ (2370) WIDTH Ξ (2370) WIDTH Ξ (2370) WIDTH VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 80 50 HASSALL 81 HBC -0 K - p 6.5 GeV/c 80± 25 94 AMIRZADEH 80 HBC -0 K - p 8.25 GeV/c 75± 69 DIBIANCA 75 DBC Ξ 2π Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Ξ (2370) DECAY MODES Mode Fraction (Γ i /Γ) Γ 1 Λ K π seen Includes Γ 4 + Γ 6 . Γ 2 Σ K π seen Includes Γ 5 + Γ 6 . Γ 3 Ω - K Γ 4 Λ K ∗ (892) Γ 5 Σ K ∗ (892) Γ 6 Σ (1385)K Ξ (2370) BRANCHING RATIOS

26

m028.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 K 1 (1270) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS K 1 (1270) MASS NODE=M028205 NODE=M028MX VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1272 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 2 datablocks that follow this one. PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE PRODUCED BY K - , BACKWARD SCATTERING, HYPERON EXCHANGE NODE=M028M2 NODE=M028M2 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1275 ± 10 1275 ± 10 1275 ± 10 1275 ± 10 700 GAVILLET 78 HBC + 4.2 K - p → Ξ - (K π π) + PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS PRODUCED BY K BEAMS NODE=M028M3 NODE=M028M3 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block

27

m033.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 ρ 5 (2350) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (5 - - ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry was previously called U 1 (2400). See also ρ(2150), NODE=M033 f 2 (2150), ρ 3 (2250), f 4 (2300). ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS NODE=M033205 NODE=M033M π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n NODE=M033M3 NODE=M033M3 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 2330 ± 35 2330 ± 35 2330 ± 35 2330 ± 35 ALDE 95 GAM2 38 π - p → ω π 0 n NODE=M033M1 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 2303 HASAN 94 RVUE p p → π π ∼ 2300 1 MARTIN 80B RVUE ∼ 2250 1 MARTIN 80C RVUE ∼ 2500 2 CARTER 78B CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → K - K + ∼ 2480 3 CARTER 77 CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → π π S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N NODE=M033M2 NODE=M033M2 VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data

28

m033.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 (2350) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (5 - - ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry was previously called U 1 (2400). See also ρ(2150), f 2 (2150), ρ 3 (2250), f 4 (2300). ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS ρ 5 (2350) MASS π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n π - p → ω π 0 n VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 2330± 35 2330± 35 2330± 35 2330± 35 ALDE 95 GAM2 38 π - p → ω π 0 n VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * ∼ 2303 HASAN 94 RVUE p p → π π ∼ 2300 1 MARTIN 80B RVUE ∼ 2250 1 MARTIN 80C RVUE ∼ 2500 2 CARTER 78B CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → K - K + ∼ 2480 3 CARTER 77 CNTR 0 0.7-2.4 p p → π π S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N S-CHANNEL N N VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2300± 45 4 ANISOVICH 02 SPEC 0.6-1.9 p p → ω π 0 , ω η π 0 , π + π - 2295±

29

Page comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

home/ home/ http://www.nersc.gov/users/computational-systems/hopper/updates-and-status/open-issues/resolved-error-message-modulecmd-switch-c-172-error-152-module-prgenv-cray-is-currently-not-loaded/#PageComment_97 > module list 2>&1 | grep Prg 32) PrgEnv-gnu/4.1.40 I ignore the error but It's a bit uncomfortable that the error takes screen the space here are my loaded modules: > module list Currently Loaded Modulefiles: 1) modules/3.2.6.6 2) xtpe-network-gemini 3) darshan/2.2.6 4) atp/1.6.2 5) switch/1.0-1.0401.36779.2.72.gem 6) shared-root/1.0-1.0401.37253.3.50.gem 7) pdsh/2.26-1.0401.37449.1.1.gem 8) nodehealth/5.0-1.0401.38460.12.18.gem 9) lbcd/2.1-1.0401.35360.1.2.gem 10) hosts/1.0-1.0401.35364.1.115.gem 11) configuration/1.0-1.0401.35391.1.2.gem 12) ccm/2.2.0-1.0401.37254.2.142 13)

30

Tribal Comments Database  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011.

31

YERMOLAEV ET AL.: COMMENT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comment on A statistical comparison of solar wind sources of moderate and intense geomagnetic storms at solar minimum and maximum by Zhang, J.-C.,

M. W. Liemohn; J. U. Kozyra; M. F. Thomsen; A. Elliott; J. M. Weyg; Yu. I. Yermolaev; M. Yu. Yermolaev; I. G. Lodkina

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

CRA Comments & Responses  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 - Hanford Tank Waste (31805) 10 Response to CRA Comments (51105) Enclosure 1 - Hanford Tank Waste (51105) Enclosure 2 - K-Basin Knock-Out Pot Sludge (51105)...

33

OSTIblog Recent comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

comments/rss en Good to know comments/rss en Good to know http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/mixing-sciencegov-coffee-and-laptop#comment-1222 I didn't know that kind of information is available on science.gov! This would be really helpful for my Dad who is now in his 70s and is always prescribed different drugs for common aging ailments. Thanks, Cathey! Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:20:57 +0000 comment 1222 at http://www.osti.gov/home The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/manhattan-project-its-immediate-influences#comment-1136 "The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences" and the Wikipedia article about the Manhattan Project do have something very specific in common. Please note that one of the Wikipedia 'References', under 'General,

34

WIPP CRA2009 Comments and Responses Enclosure 4 EPA Comment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

WIPP CRA2009 Comments and Responses Enclosure 4 EPA Comment Included in this Submittal.6.2, DOE states that the pcH of the WIPP brines is expected to be approximately 8.7... 1236... 1 #12; WIPP CRA2009 Comments and Responses Enclosure 4 EPA Comment Included

35

Dairyland Power Cooperative comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comments Dairyland Power Cooperative comments Response comments from Dairyland Power Cooperative on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logisitical Reliability Dairyland...

36

Appendix C - Comments and Responses  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

C C COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This appendix contains the comments that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the draft EA (March 22 through April 22, 2002) and their responses. Comments were obtained during the public meeting held in Carlsbad, New Mexico, on April 16, 2002, as well as from letters and electronic mail messages. The comment entries are organized according to comment categories. In compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and Council on Environmental Quality regulations, public comments on the draft EA were assessed individually and collectively. Some comments resulted in changes or modifications that have been incorporated into the final EA. Comments not requiring modifications to the EA resulted in a response to correct the

37

DUF6 EIS Public Comment Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The public comment period for the Depleted UF6 Supplemental Analysis is closed. The public comment form is no longer available. Sorry The...

38

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

extension of public comment period for reply comments. extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

39

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

40

EA and SOWP Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

EA and SOWP Comments EA and SOWP Comments This document covers Knight Piisold's technical comments to the Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (EA) and the Shiprock Site Observational Work Plan (SOWP). The major areas of concern include the following: 1. The contaminant sources on site may not be properly defined. In particular, the disposal cell and the residual vadose zone soil contamination need to be redefined in the conceptual model and the transport model. 2. The documents contain no compliance plan, making it difficult to ascertain if regulatory guidelines are being met. 3. The results of the risk assessment are not linked to the establishment of the remedial goals 4. The current design of the evaporation pond may pose environmental risks due to their

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

SRREN Comment and Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation Introduction: As part of the Final Government Distribution of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN), the U.S. Government is conducting a review of the Summary for Policymakers for the report. This web site is posted on the internet for the sole purpose of facilitating the U.S. Government review at this time. The U.S. Government provided comments previously as part of the Government and Expert Review hosted on this web site. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research

42

EIA-930 Comments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

30 Comments 30 Comments Tim Hattaway PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Page 1 PowerSouth Energy Cooperative appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Form EIA-930 report, ''Balancing Authority Operations Report''. We have several concerns with the proposed data collection effort. Some concerns PowerSouth has with the proposal are:  The DOE is seeking hourly information within minutes of the time that it becomes available to the BA in very raw form. Many times, we will not have the data available by 10-minutes after an hour due to meter error, communication glitches, etc. Providing the data in such a way will lead to many errors and gaps with the data being provided.  For a smaller sized BA such as PowerSouth, we are concerned by amount of work that will be

43

Draft WAPA Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Interwest Energy Alliance ● The Wilderness Society ● Western Grid Group Group Comments on Western Area Power Administration's Renewable Energy Transmission Program April 1, 2009 I. Introduction On behalf of Western Resource Advocates, Natural Resources Defense Council, Interwest Energy Alliance, The Wilderness Society and Western Grid Group, please accept the following comments in response to Western Area Power Administration's ("Western") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments regarding the implementation of Section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 74 Fed. Reg. 9391-9393 (Mar. 4, 2009). The 2009 Recovery Act specifically provides $3.25 billion in new borrowing authority for

44

b095.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 Z 0 (1780) 1/2 + I (J P ) = 0( 1 2 + ) Status: ∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE WILSON 72, GIACOMELLI 74, and NAKAJIMA 82B find some so- NODE=B095 lutions with resonant-like behavior in the P 01 partial wave. The effect seen in the isospin-0 total cross section, if a resonance, must have spin 1/2, because the inelastic cross section is very small and the total cross section is about 4π/k 2 . Z 0 (1780) MASS Z 0 (1780) MASS Z 0 (1780) MASS Z 0 (1780) MASS NODE=B095M NODE=B095M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1778 NAKAJIMA 82B PWA K N 0.2-1.6 GeV/c 1740 GIACOMELLI 74 PWA 0 0.38-1.51 GeV/c 1750 1 CARROLL 73B CNTR Isospin-0 σ total fit 1 OCCUR=2 1825 1 CARROLL 73B CNTR K N I = 0 total σ (fit 2) 1800 2 WILSON 72 PWA K + N P 01 wave 1780 ± 10 COOL 70B CNTR + K + p, K + d to- tal σ seen 3 DOWELL 70 CNTR K + p, d total Z 0 (1780) WIDTH Z 0 (1780) WIDTH Z 0 (1780) WIDTH Z 0 (1780) WIDTH NODE=B095W NODE=B095W VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN

45

Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before November...

46

COMMENTS OF THE BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Page 2 BONNEVILLES COMMENTS ON FORM EIA-930 II. Comments A. The Proposed Collection is not Necessary for Proper Performance of EIA Functions,

47

NIST Posts Comments on Public Safety Communications ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Posts Comments on Public Safety Communications Network. From NIST Tech Beat: November 22, 2011. ...

2011-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

48

CA IOUs Comment Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2012 June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers.

49

Comments April 11.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tom or Julie Laub Tom or Julie Laub Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:09 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge I'm sure you've heard this before but as for employee's of National Laboratories the total benefits package should not be limited to 5% above "market average." You do not want average employees at a National Laboratory--you want the best and the brightest. Don't count on a sense of national pride to keep the exceptional employee at a National Laboratory. It is hard to have national pride when your nation does not appreciate your hard work and special talents. You can make more money some place other than a National Lab so the benefits have to be the way appreciation is shown. Benefits at National Labs have been in decline

50

web_comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rec Type Rec Type Recommendations/ Comments Name Organization 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Future reliability standards must strike a balance between detailed, rigid requirements, which provide little or no latitude for deviation, and standards, which are objective-based and allow for innovation and invention to achieve intended goals. Each standard should identify its importance on the BPS reliability in terms of the potential short-term (operating time horizon) vs. long-term (planning time horizon) impacts of non-compliance. Ajay Garg, Mike Penstone Hydro One Networks Inc. 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Core Reliability Standards: comprising a small number of technical standards designed to enable the BPS to withstand and recover from unexpected contingencies. Core Reliability

51

Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Comments on Contractor Employee...

52

Comments from Edison Electric Institute | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments from Edison Electric Institute Comments from Edison Electric Institute Consolidated Comments of the Edison Electric Institute ("EEI") on (1) DOE Interim Final Rule, RIN...

53

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Comments made on behalf of the...

54

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents & Publications Before the...

55

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents & Publications Before...

56

DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

These comments are submitted by Rheem Manufacturing Company in response to the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) notice appearing in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information on...

57

AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012).

58

Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Below are links to information about how to comment on DOE NEPA projects with open comment periods, including comment periods on the proposed scope of planned NEPA documents and on draft NEPA documents (e.g., draft environmental assessments and draft environmental impacts statements). The end of each comment period is indicated below. EIS-0496: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California Scoping: Comment Period Ends 01/21/14 DOE's Western Area Power Administration, with the Bureau of Reclamation as a cooperating agency, is preparing a joint EIS and environmental impact report (under the California Environmental Quality Act) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed interconnection of certain

59

News comments: exploring, modeling, and online prediction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Online news agents provide commenting facilities for their readers to express their opinions or sentiments with regards to news stories. The number of user supplied comments on a news article may be indicative of its importance, interestingness, or impact. ...

Manos Tsagkias; Wouter Weerkamp; Maarten de Rijke

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Microsoft Word - S07803_Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

LMS/MNT/S07803 LMS/MNT/S07803 DOE Responses to April 13, 2011 BTAG Technical Review Comments on Monticello Mill Tailings Site, Operable Unit III, Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011 May 2011 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DOE Responses to BTAG Technical Review Comments May 2011 Doc. No. S07803 Page 1 Preface The following documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Legacy Management (LM) responses to joint comments received from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) on the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) Operable Unit (OU) III Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011. EPA, UDEQ, and FWS

62

Department of Energy Considers Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Considers Comments on Buried Waste Cleanup The U.S. Department of Energy is evaluating the input it received from the public during the recent public comment period on a proposed plan to cleanup buried waste at DOE's Idaho Site. "The Agencies are evaluating the input we received from the public," said Mark Arenaz, (WAG 7 Federal Project Director). "We appreciate those people and organizations who took the time to study the proposed plan and give us input. We got some very good suggestions that we will consider carefully." A total of 227 formal comments were received by DOE regarding the Proposed Plan for the Radioactive Waste Management Complex Operable Unit 7-13/14. The Proposed Plan presented five (5) alternatives to address waste remediation in the Subsurface Disposal Area, ranging from

63

Adverbs of comment and disagreement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Adverbs of comment (AOCs) such as sadly raise a question of subjective meaning, much like predicates of personal taste (fun, tasty), namely, to whom the speaker attributes the emotion or evaluation when there is no overt for-PP. I extend Lasersohn's ... Keywords: disagreement, incompleteness, judge, mis/incomphrehension, subjective meaning

Mingya Liu

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

64

Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Any person wishing to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on the main Natural Gas Regulations page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the following methods. Please be sure to include Docket No. and Application Name with your filing: E-mail: fergas@hq.doe.gov (you must include FE Docket No. in the Subject line of the email) Regular Mail: (should include an original and three paper copies of

65

PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan...

66

PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act PUBLIC COMMENT (REPLY) by OHM Remediation Services Corp. in response to DOE's PREPARATION OF REPORT TO...

67

Comment re DOE's NOI re continuation or modification of Price...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re DOE's NOI re continuation or modification of Price-Anderson Act Comment re DOE's NOI re continuation or modification of Price-Anderson Act Comments of Kerr-McGee...

68

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Comments on Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act. TRW...

69

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act We have just been notified of the December 31, 1997, Federal Register Notice of opportunity for public comment on...

70

Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act Letter to DOE General Counsel from Marilyn Gayle Hoff re renewal of the Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act...

71

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS - FAC-026-98 - States that Price-Anderson indemnification should be...

72

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment on Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on the Price Anderson...

73

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act In response the Federal Register notice of December 31, 1997 requesting public comments on the...

74

NCPA No. 2: IX comments and responses to Draft JES  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Comments received from twenty-six separate entities are included. Following each letter or set of comments are staff responses. Sections of the draft environmental statement which have been revised in response to these comments are noted. (PCS)

Not Available

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

75

Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Summary of Comments for July 2012 through August 2013 Last saved on: 8302013 Annual Summary of CRP comment for July 2011- August 2012 1 SECTION COMMENT POST? 2.0 & 4.0 1....

76

Transmission Congestion Study COMMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EDISION...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Preparation of the 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study COMMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EDISION COMPANY OF NEW YORK. INC. AND ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC....

77

Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment EO 13563 Preliminary Plan Microsoft Word - Lochinvar Comments -EO...

78

Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation...

79

Comment on "Quantum dense key distribution"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this Comment we question the security of recently proposed by Degiovanni et al. [Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 032310] scheme of quantum dense key distribution.

Antoni Wojcik

2004-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

80

Comments of the American Wind Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the American Wind Energy Association in response to the Department of Energy's solicitation for comments on the upcoming National Electric Transmission Congestion Study I. AWEA...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National...

82

Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC | Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by...

83

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013...

84

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension Proposed Infrastructure Improvements for the Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada DOE is extending the public comment period for the Yucca...

85

DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental Impact Statement DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium...

86

Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and Complaint Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and...

87

Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 November...

88

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments...

89

Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Convention on...

90

Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation DOE published a...

91

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response...

92

Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOESEA-04 Potomac River Generating Station Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOESEA-04 Potomac...

93

Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates NIST Green Button Presentation AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the...

94

Comments of the American Public Gas Association on the Smart...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of the American Public Gas Association on the Smart Grid RFI Comments from The American Public Gas Association on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing policy and logisitcal...

95

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the Association of American Railroads in response to DOE's invitation to comment on Price-Anderson indemnification (62 Fed. Reg. 68272 (Dec. 31, 1997). Public comment re...

96

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply comments to notice of inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act More Documents & Publications...

97

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Price Anderson Act Concerning The Continuation Or Modification Of The Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act More Documents & Publications PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act...

98

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST...

99

Comments by the American Electric Power System on Proposed Coordinatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments by the American Electric Power System on Proposed Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities Comments by the American Electric Power...

100

EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice to Extend Public Comment Period EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Department of Energy and the Bureau...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM...

102

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and...

103

US Department of Energy Public Participation Policy Comment Response Document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Niney-nine respondents provided comments to DOE on its ``Draft Public Involvement Policy`` (Dec. 1, 1993). Their comments and DOE`s responses are listed.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad More Documents & Publications TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER...

105

Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying...

106

Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association...

107

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio...

108

Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric onImplementing the National Broadband Plan by...

109

Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the...

110

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light...

111

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota Comments of Lake Region Electric...

112

Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges...

113

Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Electricity Advisory Committee Technology Development Transmission...

114

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Volume 2: Comment and Response Document: Chapter 2: Comment Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS 2 COMMENT DOCUMENTS This section provides copies of the actual letters or other documents containing public comments on the draft EISs that were submitted to DOE, including comments extracted from the transcripts of the public hearings. Table 2.1 contains an index of the comment documents by document number. Table 2.2 provides an index of comment documents by the commentors last name. Table 2.3 contains an index of comment documents by company or organization. Individual comments are denoted with vertical lines in the right margin. TABLE 2.1 Index of Commentors by Document Number Document Number Name Company/Organization Page D0001 Driver, Charles M. Individual 2-5 D0002 Kilrod, John Individual 2-7 D0003 Colley, Vina Portsmouth/Piketon Residents for Environmental Safety and Security

115

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

populations. It also provides recommendations for consideration by state agencies related to extreme heatDRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXTREME HEAT ADAPTATION INTERIM GUIDANCE DOCUMENT (CAT) 8/31/2012 #12;DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Page 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXTREME HEAT ADAPTATION

116

b051.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Bumps Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Formation experiments are listed separately in the preceding entry. Probably there are two states at the same mass with the same quan- tum numbers, one decaying to Σ π and Λ π, the other to Λ(1405) π. See the note in front of the preceding entry. Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE 1670± 4 1 CARROLL 76 DPWA Isospin-1 total σ 1675± 10 2 HEPP 76 DBC - K - N 1.6-1.75 GeV/c 1665± 1 APSELL 74 HBC K - p 2.87 GeV/c 1688± 2 or 1683 ± 5 1.2k BERTHON 74 HBC 0 Quasi-2-body σ 1670± 6 AGUILAR-... 70B HBC K - p → Σ π π 4 GeV 1668± 10 AGUILAR-... 70B HBC K - p → Σ 3π 4 GeV 1660± 10 ALVAREZ 63 HBC + K - p 1.51

117

m015.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

690) 690) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (3 - - ) ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 5 datablocks that follow this one. 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1677± 14 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → 2π p 1679± 11 476 BALTAY 78B HBC 0 15 π + p → π + π - n 1678± 12 175 1 ANTIPOV 77 CIBS 0 25 π - p → p 3π 1690± 7 600 1 ENGLER 74 DBC 0 6 π + n → π + π - p 1693± 8 2 GRAYER 74 ASPK 0 17 π - p → π + π - n 1678± 12 MATTHEWS 71C DBC 0 7 π + N * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1734± 10 3 CORDEN 79 OMEG 12-15 π - p → n 2π 1692±

118

b058.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

90) 90) Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) Status: ∗∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE See the note preceding the Σ (1670) Listings. Seen in production experiments only, mainly in Λ π. Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE 1698± 20 70 1 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c 1707± 20 40 2 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c 1698± 20 15 ADERHOLZ 69 HBC + π + p 8 GeV/c 1682± 2 46 BLUMENFELD 69 HBC + K 0 L p 1700± 20 MOTT 69 HBC + K - p 5.5 GeV/c 1694± 24 60 3 PRIMER 68 HBC + K - p 4.6-5 GeV/c 1700± 6 4 SIMS 68 HBC - K - N → Λ π π 1715± 12 30 COLLEY 67 HBC + K - p 6 GeV/c Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION

119

m015.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 ρ 3 (1690) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (3 - - ) ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS ρ 3 (1690) MASS NODE=M015205 NODE=M015M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE 1688.8 ± 2.1 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 5 datablocks that follow this one. 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE 2π MODE NODE=M015M1 NODE=M015M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1686 ± 4 OUR AVERAGE 1677 ± 14 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → 2π p 1679 ± 11 476 BALTAY 78B HBC 0 15 π + p → π + π - n 1678 ± 12 175 1 ANTIPOV 77 CIBS 0 25 π - p → p 3π 1690 ± 7 600 1 ENGLER 74 DBC 0 6 π + n → π + π - p 1693 ± 8 2 GRAYER 74 ASPK 0 17 π - p → π + π - n 1678 ± 12 MATTHEWS 71C DBC 0 7 π + N * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits,

120

b051.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 Σ (1670) Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Formation experiments are listed separately in the preceding entry. NODE=B051 Probably there are two states at the same mass with the same quan- tum numbers, one decaying to Σ π and Λ π, the other to Λ(1405) π. See the note in front of the preceding entry. Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS Σ (1670) MASS NODE=B051M (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) NODE=B051M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1670 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← 1670 ± 4 1 CARROLL 76 DPWA Isospin-1 total σ 1675 ± 10 2 HEPP 76 DBC - K - N 1.6-1.75 GeV/c 1665 ± 1 APSELL 74 HBC K - p 2.87 GeV/c 1688 ± 2 or 1683 ± 5 1.2k BERTHON 74 HBC 0 Quasi-2-body σ 1670 ± 6 AGUILAR-... 70B HBC K - p → Σ π π 4 GeV OCCUR=2 1668 ±

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

b078.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Production Production Experiments I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Formation experiments are listed separately in the previous entry. The results of CRENNELL 69B at 3.9 GeV/c are not confirmed by SABRE 70 at 3.0 GeV/c. However, at 4.5 GeV/c, AMMANN 70 sees a peak at 1642 MeV which on the basis of branching ratios they do not associate with the Σ (1670). See MILLER 70 for a review of these conflicts. Σ (1620) MASS Σ (1620) MASS Σ (1620) MASS Σ (1620) MASS (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1620 OUR ESTIMATE 1642± 12 AMMANN 70 DBC K - N 4.5 GeV/c 1618± 3 20 BLUMENFELD 69 HBC + K 0 L p 1619± 8 CRENNELL 69B DBC ± K - N → Λ π π π * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1616± 8 CRENNELL

122

b050.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 Ξ (1820) 3/2 - I (J P ) = 1 2 ( 3 2 - ) Status: ∗∗∗ The clearest evidence is an 8-standard-deviation peak in Λ K - seen NODE=B050 by GAY 76C. TEODORO 78 favors J = 3/2, but cannot make a parity discrimination. BIAGI 87C is consistent with J = 3/2 and favors negative parity for this J value. Ξ (1820) MASS Ξ (1820) MASS Ξ (1820) MASS Ξ (1820) MASS NODE=B050M We only average the measurements that appear to us to be most significant NODE=B050M and best determined. NODE=B050M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 1823 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1823.4 ± 1.4 OUR AVERAGE 1819.4 ± 3.1 ± 2.0 280 1 BIAGI 87 SPEC 0 Ξ - Be → (Λ K - ) X 1826 ± 3 ± 1 54 BIAGI 87C SPEC 0 Ξ - Be → (Λ K 0 ) X 1822 ± 6 JENKINS 83 MPS - K - p → K + (MM) 1830 ± 6 300 BIAGI 81 SPEC - SPS hyperon

123

b068.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

030) 030) I (J P ) = 1 2 ( ≥ 5 2 ? ) Status: ∗∗∗ The evidence for this state has been much improved by HEMING- WAY 77, who see an eight standard deviation enhancement in Σ K and a weaker coupling to Λ K . ALITTI 68 and HEMINGWAY 77 observe no signals in the Ξ π π (or Ξ (1530) π) channel, in contrast to DIBIANCA 75. The decay (Λ/Σ )K π reported by BARTSCH 69 is also not confirmed by HEMINGWAY 77. A moments analysis of the HEMINGWAY 77 data indicates at a level of three standard deviations that J ≥ 5/2. Ξ (2030) MASS Ξ (2030) MASS Ξ (2030) MASS Ξ (2030) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025 ± 5 OUR ESTIMATE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE 2025.1± 2.4 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.3. See the ideogram below. 2022 ± 7 JENKINS 83 MPS - K - p → K + MM 2024 ± 2 200 HEMINGWAY

124

m040.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

40 40 K 2 (2250) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 - ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE This entry contains various peaks in strange meson systems reported NODE=M040 in the 2150-2260 MeV region, as well as enhancements seen in the antihyperon-nucleon system, either in the mass spectra or in the J P = 2 - wave. K 2 (2250) MASS K 2 (2250) MASS K 2 (2250) MASS K 2 (2250) MASS NODE=M040M NODE=M040M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2247 ± 17 OUR AVERAGE 2200 ± 40 1 ARMSTRONG 83C OMEG - 18 K - p → Λ p X 2235 ± 50 1 BAUBILLIER 81 HBC - 8 K - p → Λ p X 2260 ± 20 1 CLELAND 81 SPEC ± 50 K + p → Λ p X * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2280 ± 20 TIKHOMIROV 03 SPEC 40.0 π - C → K 0 S K 0 S K 0 L X 2147 ± 4 37 CHLIAPNIK... 79 HBC + 32 K + p → Λ p X 2240 ± 20 20 LISSAUER 70 HBC 9 K + p 1 J P = 2 - from moments analysis. NODE=M040M;LINKAGE=Q K 2 (2250) WIDTH K 2 (2250)

125

m134.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 K ∗ 0 (1950) I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 + ) OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Seen in partial-wave analysis of the K - π + system. Needs confir- NODE=M134 mation. K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS K ∗ 0 (1950) MASS NODE=M134M NODE=M134M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1945 ± 10 ± 20 1 ASTON 88 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1917 ± 12 2 ZHOU 06 RVUE K p → K - π + n 1820 ± 40 3 ANISOVICH 97C RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n 1 We take the central value of the two solutions and the larger error given. NODE=M134M;LINKAGE=A 2 S-matrix pole. Using ASTON 88 and assuming K ∗ 0 (800), K ∗ 0 (1430). NODE=M134M;LINKAGE=ZU 3 T-matrix pole. Reanalysis of ASTON 88 data. NODE=M134M;LINKAGE=A1 K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH K ∗ 0 (1950) WIDTH NODE=M134W NODE=M134W VALUE (MeV)

126

b058.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 Σ (1690) Bumps I (J P ) = 1(? ? ) Status: ∗∗ OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE See the note preceding the Σ (1670) Listings. Seen in production NODE=B058 experiments only, mainly in Λ π. Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS Σ (1690) MASS NODE=B058M (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) (PRODUCTION EXPERIMENTS) NODE=B058M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE ≈ 1690 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← 1698 ± 20 70 1 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c OCCUR=2 1707 ± 20 40 2 GODDARD 79 HBC + π + p 10.3 GeV/c 1698 ± 20 15 ADERHOLZ 69 HBC + π + p 8 GeV/c 1682 ± 2 46 BLUMENFELD 69 HBC + K 0 L p 1700 ± 20 MOTT 69 HBC + K - p 5.5 GeV/c 1694 ± 24 60 3 PRIMER 68 HBC + K - p 4.6-5 GeV/c 1700 ± 6 4 SIMS 68 HBC - K - N → Λ π π 1715 ± 12 30 COLLEY 67 HBC + K - p 6 GeV/c Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690) WIDTH Σ (1690)

127

m200.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OMITTED FROM SUMMARY TABLE Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions. b (2S) MASS b (2S) MASS b (2S) MASS b (2S) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT...

128

m300.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WIDTH (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1576 + 49 - 55 + 98 - 91 818 + 22 - 23 + 64 - 133 6 ABLIKIM 06S BES J K + K - 0 6 A broad peak observed at K + K - invariant mass....

129

Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE requested comments on what publicly-available data and information should be considered, and what types of analysis should be performed to identify and understand the significance and character of transmission congestion. The following public comments were received as of March 30, 2012, in response to the 2012 study. DOE appreciates the comments that various individuals and organizations submitted. Comments were received from these organizations, listed alphabetically.

130

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

B-1 B-1 APPENDIX B RELATED INTERNET WEB SITES WHERE CAN I ACCESS ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REFERENCES LISTED IN THIS REFERENCE BOOK? http://www.cfo.doe.gov/policy/actindex/index.html-ssi DOE Accounting Handbook http://www.pr.doe.gov/acqguide.html DOE Acquisition Guide http://www.pr.doe.gov//acqltr.html DOE Acquisition Letters http://www.pr.doe.gov/dear.html DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) http://www.cfo.doe.gov/progliaison/bmop/index.htm DOE Business Management Oversight Process Web Page http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/ DOE Chief Financial Officer Budget Related Information (DOE Budget Call, Budget Formulation Handbook, Principles of Appropriation Law, etc.) http://home.doe.gov/news/releases99/junpr/pr99163.htm DOE Deputy Secretary's Memorandum, of June 25, 1999, on Project Management

131

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and services are transported cost effectively and in a manner which protects property, individuals and the environment. This chapter details the roles and responsibilities of the members of the contract administration team in the transportation, personal property and real property management areas. It also provides

132

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES/OBJECTIVES OF BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? WHY IS BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? Because of the criticality of the work being conducted under its contracts and the increasing pressure being put on its budgets, the Department needs to ensure that work under its contracts: * Is appropriate, appropriately documented and performance-based; * Does not violate restrictions or constraints on the use of Department of Energy (DOE)-controlled facilities; * Complies with appropriate DOE directives; * That voluntary consensus standards are used in preference to Government unique standards; * Is carried out in a manner that protects the workers, public and the environment against hazards; * Is properly authorized; and

133

Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of of North Dakota Public Service Commissioner Susan Wefald U.S. Department of Energy Transmission Congestion Study Workshop June 18, 2008 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma I am very pleased to have this chance to share thoughts with the U.S. Department of Energy at this Transmission Congestion Study Workshop. I would like to thank the Department for arranging this meeting to provide input on the 2009 study on Electric Transmission Congestion. In this talk, my thoughts represent those of the North Dakota Public Service Commission. As requested, I will be discussing changes in the North Dakota area since 2005 that affect the location, duration, frequency, magnitude, and significance of transmission congestion, including related constraints. In 2005 North Dakota had an export limit around its south and east borders (commonly referred to as NDEX) of about 1,950 MW, which if exceeded can cause

134

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

property for which they are responsible (both real and personal) and must be able to forecast future needs of the activities that they support. The real and personal property of...

135

COMMENTS OF TENDRIL NETWORKS, INC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy July 12, 2010 Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." We agree with the observation presented in this RFI that access and privacy are complementary goods. We believe that the success of the smart grid will be measured by the degree to which consumers are engaged. In order to become engaged, consumers must have access to the information about real-time conditions, historical usage and underlying prices of energy markets.

136

Toshiba RFI Comments.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Definition and Scope Definition and Scope Answer/Comment 1 What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's definition? The following points are not referencedd in EISA 1301. ・Power provider should also control the output fluctuation of renewable resources. ・The end user should have the choice of which form of power storage to be used. Certain types of energy conservation and storage could work better in different applications (e.g. not only electricity power but also stored thermal energy which is more efficient for some purpose.) 2 If the definition is overly broad, what policy risks emerge as a result? In that case, the budget will be much greater in scale. Certain smart grid investments may not be as cost effective and could get lost in the overall

137

COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA CONCERNING THE CONTINUATION...

138

Chg_req3_frm.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

metadata what's new PRGs chemical-specifc parameters ecological benchmarks EPA SSG spreadsheets (RAIS, PORTS) other 5....

139

Notices III. Summary of Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 Federal Register 32 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2012 / Notices III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to Comments During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments in response to the September 26, 2012 Federal Register notice announcing the Agency's receipt of the requests for voluntary cancellation and termination of all uses of products listed in Table 1 of Unit II. IV. Cancellation Order Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f), EPA hereby approves the requested cancellation and termination of all uses of halofenozide registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the product registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. are canceled and all uses of halofenozide are terminated. The

140

Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A 74BPrivate Citizen/Individual's Written Comments Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | 1 While anecdotal suggestions of health effects from wind turbine sound can be found online, No evidence exists regarding direct negative health effects associated with wind turbine sound in any peer reviewed, scientific papers or studies. Impacts to birds and bats are disclosed in Section 4.4.5.11-Migratory Birds - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative and 4.4.5.8-Bats - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative, respectively. Impacts to Birds and Bats will be minimized by MM-BIO-5 Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy. Additionally, refer to Appendix B-4: Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy (formerly known as the Avian and Bat

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Microsoft Word - UTC Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ADDRESSING POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES TO SMART GRID IMPLEMENTATION ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UTILITIES TELECOM COUNCIL The Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC") is pleased to provide the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. 1 While the RFI raises many important issues for the future development of the Smart Grid, UTC devotes its comments to one issue which Federal policy makers can play a uniquely important role: access to spectrum. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs

142

Microsoft Word - vol3-comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

i i VOLUME 3 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODOLOGY 1 3. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COMMENTERS 2 4. COMMENTS AND DOE RESPONSES 6 This page intentionally left blank. 1 1. INTRODUCTION The Draft EIS for the Kemper County IGCC Project was published in November 2009. DOE distributed copies of the Draft EIS to officials, agencies, Native American tribes, organizations, libraries, and members of the public identified in the distribution list (Chapter 12 of Draft EIS, Volume 1). DOE announced the notice of avail- ability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57297); and EPA published the notice of availability in the Federal Register on November 6, 2009 (74 FR 57466). This Volume 3 provides a

143

AES Round 2 Official Public Comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... nist.gov> Subject: Comments on MARS Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 13:53:39 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72 ...

2007-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

144

Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Alerts Comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alerts Comments If you have a question about Energy Citations Database Alerts, we recommend you check frequently asked questions. If your question still has not been answered or if...

145

NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energys efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and...

146

MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energys (DOEs) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that...

147

EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

403: Public Comment Period Extension 403: Public Comment Period Extension EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced a two-week extension of the public comment period for the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Solar PEIS), a joint effort with the Department of Energy. The agencies had previously provided for a 120-day public comment period on the Draft Solar PEIS. Because of numerous requests, the agencies extended the comment period by an additional two weeks beyond April 16, 2011. The comment period ran (with extension) until May 2, 2011. EIS-0403-DEIS_Second_Comment_Extension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period

148

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and American Public Power Association file these brief reply comments in support of the comments and reply comments filed by the Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC"). Both organizations strongly believe that the Administration should ensure that adequate spectrum is available for internal, utility networks. Integrating Smart Grid technologies into Cooperative and Public Power Systems will necessitate enhanced communications networks. In some instances, Cooperatives and Public Power Systems may choose a commercial provider for at least some portion of their communication network service

149

Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. ("Entergy"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, regarding the current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities. Entergy commented on similar issues in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") during the FCC's development of the National Broadband Plan. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc.

150

DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is now interested in receiving comment on the suggestions and comments received from outside parties. Those comments and suggestions are posted on the Office of the General Counsel website: Retrospective Review of Regulations. On January 31, 2011, the Department took two steps to launch its

151

DOE lead agency interim final and proposed rules - EEI comments...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

final and proposed rules - EEI comments 10-20-08.doc Consolidated Comments of the Edison Electric Institute ("EEI") on (1) DOE Interim Final Rule, RIN 1901-AB18, 73 Fed. Reg....

152

Public comment to Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment to Price-Anderson Act Public comment to Price-Anderson Act Letter from Glenn Sundstrom to DOE urging DOE to "eliminate the limit of liability in Price Anderson...

153

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Department of Energy (DOE) Price-Anderson Act Comments from White Pine County, Nevada. The views of many "Affected Units of...

154

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply comments by the ad hoc...

155

Property:FirstWellFlowComments | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Property Name FirstWellFlowComments Property Type String Pages using the property "FirstWellFlowComments" Showing 1 page using this property. C...

156

Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of...

157

Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Motion to intervene and comments of the energy...

158

The EIS Comment-Response Process (October 2004)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THE EIS THE EIS COMMENT-RESPONSE PROCESS October 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Environment, Safety and Health Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance The EIS Comment-Response Process Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Comment-Response Process...................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose of this Guidance ...............................................................................................2 1.3 Terms Used in this Guidance .........................................................................................3 2.0 General Principles for the Comment-Response Process .........................................................5

159

90915DOE 2010 Plan Comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 A B C D E F G H 9/15/2009 DOE URTAC: 2010 DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN COMMENTS (with assigned topic areas) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (& POLICY) TECHNOLO GY TRANSFER 2007, 2008, 2009 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMEN T METRICS & BENEFITS ASSESSMEN T 2010 PROGRAM Environment al and Prior Recommend ation Review ADMIN & EDITORIAL COMMENTS 2007 X X X 2008 X X 2009 X X X 2010 X X X X X X COMMENTS FROM DON SPARKS: The following areas are of importance: Unconventional Resource X 1. Resource Assessment X a. Resource assessment (p. 28) X b. Geosciences (p. 28) X c. Basin Analysis & Resource Exploitation (p. 29) X 2. Early Stage Research or novel concepts.... (p. 30) X 3. Develop and execute innovative approaches .......(p. 30) X Drilling/completion/water management

160

Predicting the Volume of Comments on Online News Stories  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that predicts the comment volume of news articles prior to publication using five feature sets. We address Algorithms, Theory, Experimentation, Measurement Keywords Comment volume, prediction, feature engineering 1, and attempt to predict news arti- cle comment volume prior to publication time. One might raise the question

de Rijke, Maarten

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm Incorporated Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the Federal Communications Commission's National Broadband Plan ("NBP") that focus on how broadband communications systems can achieve the critically important U.S. goals of energy independence and enhanced energy efficiency. See FCC NBP at 247. In this regard, Qualcomm explains how commercial

162

Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report. Final: Comments and Responses to Comments  

SciTech Connect

This document is the Comments and Responses to Comments volume of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project (Final EIS/EIR). This volume of the Final EIS/EIR provides copies of the written comments received on the Draft EIS/EIR and the leady agency responses to those comments in conformance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

None

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

163

Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative is a generation and transmission cooperative (G&T) that provides the wholesale electrical requirements and other services for 25 electric distribution cooperatives and 16 municipal utilities in the Upper Midwest. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More Documents & Publications AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For Information (RFI): Addressing Policy & Logistical Challenges.

164

Proposed standby gasoline rationing plan: public comments  

SciTech Connect

Under the proposed plan, DOE would allocate ration rights (rights to purchase gasoline) to owners of registered vehicles. All vehicles in a given class would receive the same entitlement. Essential services would receive supplemental allotments of ration rights as pririty firms. Once every 3 months, ration checks would be mailed out to all vehicle registrants, allotting them a certain amount of ration rights. These checks would then be cashed at Coupon Issuance Points, where the bearer would receive ration coupons to be used at gasoline stations. Large users of gasoline could deposit their allotment checks in accounts at ration banks. Coupons or checks would be freely exchangeable in a white market. A certain percentage of the gasoline supply would be set aside in reserve for use in national emergencies. When the plan was published in the Federal Register, public comments were requested. DOE also solicited comments from private citizens, public interest groups, business and industry, state and local governments. A total of 1126 responses were reveived and these are analyzed in this paper. The second part of the report describes how the comments were classified, and gives a statistical breakdown of the major responses. The last section is a discussion and analysis of theissue raised by commenting agencies, firms, associations, and individuals. (MCW)

1978-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

Solar cells with a twist Comments ( 35)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Solar cells with a twist Article Comments ( 35) JULIE STEENHUYSEN REUTERS OCTOBER 7, 2008 AT 9:58 AM EDT CHICAGO -- U.S. researchers have found a way to make efficient silicon-based solar cells of buildings as opportunities for solar energy," Prof. Rogers said in a telephone interview. Solar cells, which

Rogers, John A.

166

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The documents are the Electricity Distribution System Workshop Discussion Summary and the Electricity Transmission System Workshop Discussion Summary. Written comments are to be received no later than March 25, 2013. For details on how to submit comments, please view the Federal Register Notice, below. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

167

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Docket No. EO-05-01: In accordance with Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the Department of Energy on February 17, 2006. Potomac Electric Power Company and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. jointly submit these comments and answer to the requests for rehearing submitted by the City of Alexandria, Virginia and the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality in the captioned proceeding . Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public

168

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the Request for Information (Request or RFI) on smart grid policy and logistical challenges, published by the Department of Energy (DOE) on September 16, 2010 AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More Documents & Publications Comments on Smart Grid data access Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access

169

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The documents are the Electricity Distribution System Workshop Discussion Summary and the Electricity Transmission System Workshop Discussion Summary. Written comments are to be received no later than March 25, 2013. For details on how to submit comments, please view the Federal Register Notice, below. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

170

American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company LLC, by its corporate manager, ATC Management Inc. (collectively "ATCLLC") is pleased to have the opportunity to provide the following comments on the additional matters to be considered by DOE in connection with the Rules. Interim Final Rule Comments, RIN 1901-AB18 Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities More Documents & Publications Comments of the Staff of the public utilities commission of the state of California on the interim final rule Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities

171

The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS. The EIS Comment-Response Process More Documents & Publications EIS Distribution Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation CorridorDOE/EIS-0250F-S2andFinal Envir

172

EEG's Preliminary Comments on Basis of Characterization  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12-03 07,58 FROM,LM TECHNOLOGIES INC 12-03 07,58 FROM,LM TECHNOLOGIES INC ID,5052343008 PAGE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION GROUP , OPPORTUNrTY ( ~ nve ACTION 8'.1PlOYER 1007 WYOMING BOULEVARD, N.E. SUITE F-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87100 (505) 828-1003 FAX (~) 826.1062 ~.:":o September 17, 1999 Dr -Ines Triay. Manager Carlsbad Area Office U-S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad. NM 88221-3090 -,' '0,-. - Dear Dr. Triay: EEG's preliminary comments on the Fundamental Bases of the Characterizaf;on ReCfl.tirement... for Disposal of Transuran;c Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant and Findings and Recommendations of the TranS1lranic U'aste Characterization :rask FQrce Final Report (August 9, 1999) are attached. Our comments are not a critique of the two reports but are limited to those recommendations

173

Microsoft Word - LS Power Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Behalf of LS Power Associates, L.P. on the Proposed Transmission Infrastructure Program Pursuant to the Federal Register Notice in Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 41, LS Power Associates, L.P. ("LS Power") submits the following comments on the Proposed Transmission Infrastructure Program ("TIP") by the Western Area Power Administration ("Western") to implement section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("Recovery Act"). 1. Introduction LS Power is an independent power generation and transmission group with a proven track record of successful development activities, operations management and commercial execution. LS Power has been involved in the development, construction, or operations of over 20,000 MW of power generation

174

Microsoft Word - OKalossa Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 8H033 Washington, D.C. 20585 RE: Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (September 17, 2010). Ladies and Gentlemen: Okaloosa Gas District (The District) an Independent Special District of the State of Florida is appreciative of the opportunity to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (Sep. 17, 2010). The Request seeks comment on

175

Microsoft Word - supplemental comment letter.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 23, 2006 Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Dear Mr. Mansueti: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., submits the following comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) February 17 Order for Rehearing Emergency Order 202-05-3. District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO- 05-01, Order No. 202-06-01 (Dep't of Energy, Feb. 17, 2006).

176

Microsoft Word - DOE Comments on IIP  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

David R. Moeller David R. Moeller Senior Attorney 218-723-3963 dmoeller@allete.com October 30, 2013 Julie A. Smith Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Minnesota Power's Comments Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53,436 (August 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Lawrence: Minnesota Power hereby provides comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") in the above-referenced Federal Register publication. Minnesota Power has been working closely with the DOE and other state and

177

EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments More Documents & Publications The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and the Rate-Related Issues That May Impede Its Expansion The potential benefits of distributed deneration and rate-related issues that may impede issues its expansion. June 2007 STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF PRIVATE WIRE LAWS ON DEVELOPMENT OF COMBINED HEAT AND POWER FACILITIE

178

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

179

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Challenges. Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. The Alliance to Save Energy is a coalition of prominent business, government, environmental, and consumer leaders who promote the efficient use of energy worldwide to benefit consumers, the environment, economy, and national security. The Alliance to Save Energy (the Alliance) thanks the Department of Energy for the opportunity to comment on broad issues of policy and logistical challenges faced in smart grid implementation. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. More Documents & Publications DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request

180

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation I am seeking to develop America's first Smart Grid R&D Testing business campus on 200 near-enterprise zone acres owned by Clatsop County Oregon zoned and master-planned as North Coast Business Park. This campus will feature a private sector-owned substation specifically designed for SG R&D testing that is currently being designed by SAIC firm RW Beck. Public Submission Draft Comments: Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation More Documents & Publications CenterPoint Comments City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

182

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation submits the following comments to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in hopes that their contribution can highlight and further the understanding of the DOE on the key role that integrated communications will play ineneabling utilities to deploy cost-effective long-term smart grid benefits. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation More Documents & Publications Comments of Tendril Networks Inc Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2001

183

Microsoft Word - neitb_noi_comment_final2.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB) Notice of to the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB) Notice of Inquiry Page 1 of 273 Comments Received In Response to the Federal Register Notice of Inquiry [FR doc. 04-16724] on the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB). The following material comprises the comments received by DOE in response to the Federal Register Notice of Inquiry [FR doc. 04-16724] issued on July 22, 2004, which solicited comments related to the Designation of National Interest Transmission Bottlenecks (NIETB). DOE presents the comments as received and without any endorsement of their validity. The comments are listed in order they were received. Appended 10/15/04 1. Comments of Control for the Process Industry, 8/18/04, 2:26pm

184

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016. The Plumbing Manufacturers Institute submits supplemental comments regarding the definition of showerheads in interpetive rule 10 C.F.R. Section 430.2. Comment alleges that the interpretive rule violates the APA and the EPA, but focuses on the economic impact of the rule, claiming that

185

Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension Public comment re Price Anderson Act extension Recently I learned of interpretations of the University's comments submitted on January 30, 1998, that I think bear some clarification. One of our comments suggested an alternative for DOE if the civil fine exemption were to be eliminated. That comment was not an endorsement for eliminating the exemption; rather it is a means for partially mitigating the adverse consequences to the production of science were the exemption eliminated. The University has never believed that the risk of financial incentives or penalties is the most appropriate means of motivating non-profit organizations to either perform better or avoid inappropriate actions. Consequently we do not embrace the imposition of criminal or civil fines

186

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period September 29, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin J. Morgan morgan@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 Kelly K. Snyder snyderk@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada. The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011, rather than October 27. Within the draft SWEIS, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office presents a formal analysis of

187

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period September 29, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin J. Morgan morgan@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 Kelly K. Snyder snyderk@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada. The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011, rather than October 27. Within the draft SWEIS, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office presents a formal analysis of

188

AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in reply to initial comments of a number of entities to the Request for Information (Request or RFI) on access to data in the smart grid space, published by the Department of Energy (DOE) on May 11, 2010. AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy

189

Microsoft Word - Public Comments EPAct 1817 061507.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. Table of Contents 1. IDAHO ENERGY DIVISION ..............................................................................1 2. MARK B. LIVELY, LIVELY UTILITY (CONSULTING) ..............................2 3. STEVE HALL ........................................................................................................3 4. THERESE STOVALL, ORNL .............................................................................4

190

Public Comments by Inyo County re Price-Anderson Act | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments by Inyo County re Price-Anderson Act Public Comments by Inyo County re Price-Anderson Act Public Comments by Inyo County re NOTICE OF INQUIRY CONCERNING PREPARATION OF...

191

Comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New England Electric Transmission Corporation on New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open Access Requirement for International Electric Transmission Facilities Comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open Access Requirement for International Electric Transmission Facilities Motion to intervene out of time and comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation, New England Hydro-Transmission Electric Company, Inc. and New England Hydro-Transmission Corporation and New England Power Company. Comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation on Proposed Open Access Requirement for International Electric Transmission Facilities FE Docket No 99-1 (PP-76/EA-76) More Documents & Publications Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No.

192

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

hold four additional public meetings for the two draft National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (National Corridors) during the 60-day public comment period, which will...

193

Comments of Tendril Networks Inc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tendril Networks Inc Tendril Networks Inc Comments of Tendril Networks Inc Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) in response to the Request for Information "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home energy management and demand response. Therefore, our comments will primarily address issues that affect metering technologies, consumer-facing programs and the integration of new technologies with grid infrastructure. Comments of Tendril Networks Inc More Documents & Publications Questions and Answers for the Smart Grid Investment Grant Program: Applicability of Buy American Provision of Section 1605 of the Recovery Act

194

DOE Extends Public Comment Period for the Draft Uranium Leasing...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home DOE Extends Public Comment Period for the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement DOE Extends Public...

195

Uranium Leasing Program Draft PEIS Public Comment Period Extended...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Centers Field Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Uranium Leasing Program Draft PEIS Public Comment Period Extended to May 31, 2013 Uranium...

196

Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan Comments on Department of...

197

Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order...

198

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental...

199

Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River...

200

AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

into federal-state collaborative efforts such as the FERC National Action Plan on Demand Response? Consumer Commenters make the distinction between the modernization...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Tendril RFI Comments - 11.1.10 - DRAFT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a software and hardware solution that enables residential home energy management and demand response. Therefore, our comments will primarily address issues that affect...

202

Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of the Natural Resource...

203

Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Register "Notice of inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act." Comments focus on the following three ideas. First, we strongly support...

204

Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve the Potomac River Substation on January 9, 2006. Comments...

205

EIS-0369: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridor and Rail Alignment The Department of Energy is now announcing an additional...

206

EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Meetings EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project...

207

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The documents are the Electricity Distribution System Workshop Discussion Summary and the Electricity...

208

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law...

209

Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid The undersigned members of the natural gas industry are pleased to submit for your consideration the following comments in response...

210

Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of...

211

Ex parte discussion clarifying NEMA's comments | Department of...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

More Documents & Publications NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Response to Smart Grid RFI Audit Report: OAS-M-13-05...

212

Microsoft Word - Aug 2011 60-day FRN comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

is in reference to the U.S Department of Energy, Notice and Request for Comments, monthly vs. quarterly reporting. The importance of reporting and collecting project...

213

NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the...

214

City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") hereby submits the following comments in response to the notice of emergency action published in the Federal Register on January...

215

Comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, Federal RegisterVol. 75, No. 100, Tuesday, May 25, 2010Notices, July 26, 2010. Comments regarding U.S....

216

Comments on EIA-930 Balancing Authority Operations Report  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Comments on EIA-930 Balancing Authority Operations Report: a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions ...

217

NEHRP - Opportunity for Public Comment on Development of ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Opportunity for Public Comment on Development of NIST Measurement Science R&D Roadmap Deadline was 5 pm EDT on Friday, June 28, 2013. ...

218

Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation 1 To provide greater transparency to the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup of nuclear legacy waste, DOE made the "West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to DOE by one individual and two organizations:  Raymond C. Vaughan, PhD.,  The West Valley Citizen Task Force, and  The Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes.

219

AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy AARP Reply Comments to Department of...

220

Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request forInformation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Avista Corporation on...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Southern Company...

222

Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc....

223

Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Association, Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association,...

224

Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments to DOE Request for...

225

Comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation on...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

out of time and comments of New England Electric Transmission Corporation, New England Hydro-Transmission Electric Company, Inc. and New England Hydro-Transmission Corporation and...

226

Comments on Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA from the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. Comments on Emergency Order to...

227

NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities...

228

NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company...

229

Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hussmann manufacturer of commercial refrigeration products, appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's Request for Comments on the topic of the Regulatory...

230

Public Comment on Price Anderson Act from the University of Chicago...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment on Price Anderson Act from the University of Chicago Public Comment on Price Anderson Act from the University of Chicago THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Operator of Argonne...

231

Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For Information...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For Information (RFI): Addressing Policy & Logistical Challenges. Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For...

232

Internet requests for comments (RFCs) as scholarly publications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This note describes the various peer review processes applied to Internet Requests for Comments (RFCs) over a number of years, and suggests that these have been up to normal scholarly standards since at least 1992. The authors believe that these documents ... Keywords: request for comments, rfc

Brian E. Carpenter; Craig Partridge

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting of Transmission Lines Submitted as of March 28, 2012 2 1.0 Background. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project (SunZia or the Project) is a joint development effort currently underway in Arizona and New Mexico. The Project definition includes licensing, permitting, financing, constructing and operating up to two 500 kilovolt alternating current (AC) transmission lines and up to five interconnecting substations.

234

Microsoft Word - Contents-comments-Sept.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Responses U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah September 2005 The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of

235

SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments SMART GRID Request for Information And Public Comments July 20, 2011 - 2:46pm Addthis As part of its ongoing effort regarding the formation of smart grid policy, the Department of Energy issued a Request for Information in September of 2010 on the topic of "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." The purpose was to solicit comments from interested stakeholders on policy and logistical challenges that confront smart grid implementation, and recommendations on how to best overcome those challenges. The comments and recommendations will help inform the Department and the Administration's analysis of policy challenges and possible solutions being developed by the Smart Grid Subcommittee of the National Science and

236

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations, May 8, 2007. DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations, May 8, 2007. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that it will hold four additional public meetings for the two draft National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (National Corridors) during the 60-day public comment period, which will close on July 6, 2007. The four additional meetings will be held in June in: Phoenix, Arizona; Las Vegas, Nevada; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Rochester, New York. DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations, May 8, 2007. More Documents & Publications DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designations

237

EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31: Extension of Public Comment Period 31: Extension of Public Comment Period EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project, CA The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice of availability on July 22, 2013 (78 FR 43870) that provided for a comment period ending September 3, 2013. DOE is extending the public comment period to October 1, 2013, and announces public hearings for the Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project Preliminary Staff Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (PSA/DEIS; DOE/EIS--0431D; 78 FR 52764). The PSA/DEIS is available on the internet at http://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0431-draft-environmental-impact-statement

238

EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Period Public Comment Period EIS-0431: Extension of Public Comment Period Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project, CA The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice of availability on July 22, 2013 (78 FR 43870) that provided for a comment period ending September 3, 2013. DOE is extending the public comment period to October 1, 2013, and announces public hearings for the Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project Preliminary Staff Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (PSA/DEIS; DOE/EIS--0431D; 78 FR 52764). The PSA/DEIS is available on the internet at http://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0431-draft-environmental-impact-statement or on the CEC electronic docket site at

239

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act COMMENTS by OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORP on 62 CFR 68272, Re: Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel; Preparation of Report to Congress on Price-Anderson Act. OHM Remediation Services Corp. ("OHM") is a diversified services firm for government and private sector clients and provides a broad range of outsourced services including environmental remediation and project, program and construction management services. OHM is submitting comments, questions and requests for clarification to the DOE because the continued viability of the Act is crucial to OHM's core business. However, the Act needs to be modified to reflect the current state of the nuclear industry which currently has a stronger focus on decommissioning and

240

City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 The City of Fort Collins provided comments to the Department of Energy's notice of intent to seek approval of an extension of Information Collection 1910-5149 for Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant reporting for four years, which was published in the Federal Register August 10, 2011, Vol. 76, No. 154, page 49460. Fort Collins finds the current collection period burdensome and recommends quarterly reporting. View information on Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grants. View the Federal Register Notice. City of Fort Collins FRN Information Collection comments.pdf More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013 - 9:10am Addthis John Hale III John Hale III Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is currently seeking comments, now through July 29, on an opportunity for Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services. Comments are sought from interested vendors holding active GSA Schedule 70 contracts (General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software, and Services) covering SIN 132-51 (Information Technology Professional Services) on draft performance-based scopes of work. The anticipated NAICS code is 541513 - Computer Facilities Management Services,

242

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") hereby submits the following comments in response to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26203 (May 11, 2010). The RFI requests comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding current and potential practices and policies for the states and other entities to empower consumers, and perhaps others, through access to detailed energy

243

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials November 12, 2013 - 4:33pm Addthis Tim Jackson Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office NOTICE: DOE has extended the public comment period on its Draft Environmental Assessment for Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials to January 10, 2014. The U.S. Department of Energy invites the public to read and comment on a draft environmental assessment it has prepared for a proposal to resume transient testing of nuclear fuels and materials at either Idaho National

244

Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring Federal Authorizations Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring Federal Authorizations September 25, 2013 - 4:24pm Addthis On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. An announcement extending the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process was published in the Federal Register on

245

Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 The Department of Energy invited public comment on DOE's intent to publish the Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline. The guideline describes a risk management process that is targeted to the specific needs of electricity sector organizations and adds to the body of resources that help refine the definition and application of effective cybersecurity for all organizations in the Electricity Sector. Comments were due by October 28, 2011.

246

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013 - 9:10am Addthis John Hale III John Hale III Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is currently seeking comments, now through July 29, on an opportunity for Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services. Comments are sought from interested vendors holding active GSA Schedule 70 contracts (General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software, and Services) covering SIN 132-51 (Information Technology Professional Services) on draft performance-based scopes of work. The anticipated NAICS code is 541513 - Computer Facilities Management Services,

247

Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors November 9, 2006 - 9:38am Addthis Under Section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Department of Energy must issue a report based on the Department's August 8 Congestion Study. In that report, the Secretary may designate as a "national interest electric transmission corridor" (National Corridor) any geographic area experiencing electric energy transmission capacity constraints or congestion that adversely affects consumers. After issuing the August 8 Congestion Study, the Department invited public comment and received comments on the study from a variety of entities

248

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act Public comment on Price-Anderson Act COMMENTS by OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORP on 62 CFR 68272, Re: Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel; Preparation of Report to Congress on Price-Anderson Act. OHM Remediation Services Corp. ("OHM") is a diversified services firm for government and private sector clients and provides a broad range of outsourced services including environmental remediation and project, program and construction management services. OHM is submitting comments, questions and requests for clarification to the DOE because the continued viability of the Act is crucial to OHM's core business. However, the Act needs to be modified to reflect the current state of the nuclear industry which currently has a stronger focus on decommissioning and

249

Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 Notice of Public Comment on Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline: Federal Register Notice Volume 76, No. 180 - Sep. 16, 2011 The Department of Energy invited public comment on DOE's intent to publish the Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline. The guideline describes a risk management process that is targeted to the specific needs of electricity sector organizations and adds to the body of resources that help refine the definition and application of effective cybersecurity for all organizations in the Electricity Sector. Comments were due by October 28, 2011.

250

Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. ("Southern"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE's") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, about current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities.1 Southern appreciates the opportunity to provide DOE with additional information and to respond to the initial comments submitted in this proceeding. As discussed more fully below, Southern believes that privately-owned and operated systems will continue to be needed for command and control operations. In addition, Southern is not

251

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response to U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (Jul. 27, 2010) and 75 Fed. Reg. 51986 (Aug. 24, 2010). Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation More Documents & Publications CIGNLCommentsDOECSCRulemaking11-30-10.doc DOE Notice of Inquiry on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) Contingent Cost Allocation - March 2, 2011 Meeting

252

m022.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 K ∗ 2 (1430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 + ) We consider that phase-shift analyses provide more reliable determi- NODE=M022 nations of the mass and width. K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS NODE=M022205 CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π NODE=M022M1 NODE=M022M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6 ± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 1420 ± 4 1587 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 1436 ± 5.5 400 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 30 K + p → K 0 S π + p OCCUR=2 1430 ± 3.2 1500 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 50 K + p → K 0 S π + p OCCUR=3 1430 ± 3.2 1200 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC - 50 K + p → K 0 S π - p 1423 ± 5 935 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 1428.0 ± 4.6 3 MARTIN 78 SPEC + 10 K ± p → K 0 S π p OCCUR=2

253

m034.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

670) 670) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (2 - + ) π 2 (1670) MASS π 2 (1670) MASS π 2 (1670) MASS π 2 (1670) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE 1672.2± 3.0 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below. 1658 ± 3 + 24 - 8 420k ALEKSEEV 10 COMP 190 π - P b → π - π - π + Pb ' 1749 ± 10 ± 100 145k LU 05 B852 18 π - p → ω π - π 0 p 1676 ± 3 ± 8 1 CHUNG 02 B852 18.3 π - p → π + π - π - p 1685 ± 10 ± 30 2 BARBERIS 01 450 p p → p f 3π 0 p s 1687 ± 9 ± 15 AMELIN 99 VES 37 π - A → ω π - π 0 A ∗ 1669 ± 4 BARBERIS 98B 450 p p → p f ρ π p s 1670 ± 4 BARBERIS 98B 450 p p → p f f 2 (1270) π p s 1730 ± 20 3 AMELIN 95B VES 36 π - A → π + π - π - A 1690 ± 14 4 BERDNIKOV 94 VES 37 π - A → K + K - π - A 1710 ± 20 700 ANTIPOV 87 SIGM - 50 π - Cu → µ + µ - π - Cu 1676 ± 6 4 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → 3π p 1657 ± 14 4,5 DAUM 80D SPEC - 63-94 π p → 3π X 1662 ± 10 2000

254

m011.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 b 1 (1235) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (1 + - ) b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS NODE=M011M NODE=M011M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. 1225 ± 5 WEIDENAUER 93 ASTE p p → 2π + 2π - π 0 1235 ± 15 ALDE 92C GAM2 38,100 π - p → ω π 0 n 1236 ± 16 FUKUI 91 SPEC 8.95 π - p → ω π 0 n 1222 ± 6 ATKINSON 84E OMEG ± 25-55 γ p → ω π X OCCUR=2 1237 ± 7 ATKINSON 84E OMEG 0 25-55 γ p → ω π X 1239 ± 5 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → ω π p 1251 ± 8 450 GESSAROLI 77 HBC - 11 π - p → π - ω p 1245 ± 11 890 FLATTE 76C HBC - 4.2 K - p → π - ω Σ + 1222 ± 4 1400 CHALOUPKA 74 HBC - 3.9 π - p 1220 ± 7 600 KARSHON 74B HBC + 4.9 π + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1190 ± 10 AUGUSTIN 89 DM2 ± e + e - → 5π 1213 ± 5 ATKINSON

255

m036.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 a 0 (980) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (0 + + ) See our minireview on scalar mesons under f 0 (500). (See the index NODE=M036 for the page number.) a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS NODE=M036205 NODE=M036MX VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980 ± 20 OUR ESTIMATE Mass determination very model dependent → UNCHECKED ← η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY NODE=M036M1 NODE=M036M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 982.5 ± 1.6 ± 1.1 16.9k 1 AMBROSINO 09F KLOE 1.02 e + e - → η π 0 γ 986 ± 4 ANISOVICH 09 RVUE 0.0 p p, π N 982.3 + 0.6 - 0.7 + 3.1 - 4.7 2 UEHARA 09A BELL γ γ → π 0 η 987.4 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 3,4 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η OCCUR=2 989.1 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 4,5 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η 985 ± 4 ± 6 318 ACHARD 02B

256

m035.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 K ∗ 4 (2045) I (J P ) = 1 2 (4 + ) K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS K ∗ 4 (2045) MASS NODE=M035M NODE=M035M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE 2045 ± 9 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 2062 ± 14 ± 13 1 ASTON 86 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 2039 ± 10 400 2,3 CLELAND 82 SPEC ± 50 K + p → K 0 S π ± p 2070 + 100 - 40 4 ASTON 81C LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 2079 ± 7 431 TORRES 86 MPSF 400 p A → 4K X 2088 ± 20 650 BAUBILLIER 82 HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 S π - p 2115 ± 46 488 CARMONY 77 HBC 0 9 K + d → K + π 's X 1 From a fit to all moments. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=E 2 From a fit to 8 moments. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=B 3 Number of events evaluated by us. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=W 4 From energy-independent partial-wave analysis. NODE=M035M;LINKAGE=D K ∗ 4 (2045) WIDTH K ∗

257

m022.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

430) 430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 + ) We consider that phase-shift analyses provide more reliable determi- nations of the mass and width. K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS K ∗ 2 (1430) MASS CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE K π VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE 1425.6± 1.5 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 1420 ± 4 1587 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 1436 ± 5.5 400 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 30 K + p → K 0 S π + p 1430 ± 3.2 1500 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 50 K + p → K 0 S π + p 1430 ± 3.2 1200 1,2 CLELAND 82 SPEC - 50 K + p → K 0 S π - p 1423 ± 5 935 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 1428.0± 4.6 3 MARTIN 78 SPEC + 10 K ± p → K 0 S π p 1423.8± 4.6 3 MARTIN 78 SPEC - 10 K ± p → K 0 S π p 1420.0± 3.1 1400 AGUILAR-... 71B

258

m060.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 K ∗ 3 (1780) I (J P ) = 1 2 (3 - ) K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS K ∗ 3 (1780) MASS NODE=M060M NODE=M060M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1776 ± 7 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 1781 ± 8 ± 4 1 ASTON 88 LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 1740 ± 14 ± 15 1 ASTON 87 LASS 0 11 K - p → K 0 π + π - n 1779 ± 11 2 BALDI 76 SPEC + 10 K + p → K 0 π + p 1776 ± 26 3 BRANDENB... 76D ASPK 0 13 K ± p → K ± π ∓ N * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1720 ± 10 ± 15 6111 4 BIRD 89 LASS - 11 K - p → K 0 π - p 1749 ± 10 ASTON 88B LASS - 11 K - p → K - η p 1780 ± 9 300 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 1790 ± 15 BAUBILLIER 82B HBC 0 8.25 K - p → K 0 S 2π N 1784 ± 9 2060 CLELAND 82 SPEC ± 50 K + p → K 0 S π ± p 1786 ± 15 5 ASTON 81D LASS 0 11 K - p → K - π + n 1762 ± 9 190 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 1850 ± 50 ETKIN 80 MPS

259

m023.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

770) 770) I (J P ) = 1 2 (2 - ) See our mini-review in the 2004 edition of this Review, PDG 04. K 2 (1770) MASS K 2 (1770) MASS K 2 (1770) MASS K 2 (1770) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1773± 8 1773± 8 1773± 8 1773± 8 1 ASTON 93 LASS 11K - p → K - ω p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1743± 15 TIKHOMIROV 03 SPEC 40.0 π - C → K 0 S K 0 S K 0 L X 1810± 20 FRAME 86 OMEG + 13 K + p → φK + p ∼ 1730 ARMSTRONG 83 OMEG - 18.5 K - p → 3K p ∼ 1780 2 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p 1710± 15 60 CHUNG 74 HBC - 7.3 K - p → K - ω p 1767± 6 BLIEDEN 72 MMS - 11-16 K - p 1730± 20 306 3 FIRESTONE 72B DBC + 12 K + d 1765± 40 4 COLLEY 71 HBC + 10 K + p → K 2π N 1740 DENEGRI 71 DBC - 12.6 K - d → K 2π d 1745± 20 AGUILAR-... 70C HBC - 4.6 K - p 1780± 15 BARTSCH 70C HBC - 10.1 K - p 1760± 15 LUDLAM 70 HBC - 12.6 K - p 1 From a partial wave analysis of the K - ω system. 2 From a partial wave analysis of the K - 2π system. 3 Produced

260

m064.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

400) 400) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 + ) K 1 (1400) MASS K 1 (1400) MASS K 1 (1400) MASS K 1 (1400) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1403± 7 OUR AVERAGE 1463± 64 ± 68 7k ASNER 00B CLEO ± τ - → K - π + π - ν τ 1373± 14 ± 18 1 ASTON 87 LASS 0 11 K - p → K 0 π + π - n 1392± 18 BAUBILLIER 82B HBC 0 8.25 K - p → K 0 S π + π - n 1410± 25 DAUM 81C CNTR - 63 K - p → K - 2π p 1415± 15 ETKIN 80 MPS 0 6 K - p → K 0 π + π - n 1404± 10 2 CARNEGIE 77 ASPK ± 13 K ± p → (K π π) ± p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1418± 8 25k 3 ABLIKIM 06C BES2 J/ψ → K ∗ (892) 0 K + π - ∼ 1350 4 TORNQVIST 82B RVUE ∼ 1400 VERGEEST 79 HBC - 4.2 K - p → (K π π) - p ∼ 1400 BRANDENB... 76 ASPK ± 13 K ± p → (K π π) ± p 1420 DAVIS 72 HBC + 12 K + p 1368± 18 FIRESTONE 72B DBC + 12 K + d 1 From partial-wave analysis of K 0 π + π - system. 2 From a model-dependent fit with Gaussian

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

s010.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

± ± I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 - ) A REVIEW GOES HERE - Check our WWW List of Reviews K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677± 0.016 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 2.8. 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below. 493.696± 0.007 1 DENISOV 91 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.636± 0.011 2 GALL 88 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.640± 0.054 LUM 81 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.670± 0.029 BARKOV 79 EMUL ± e + e - → K + K - 493.657± 0.020 2 CHENG 75 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.691± 0.040 BACKENSTO...73 CNTR - Kaonic atoms * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 493.631± 0.007 GALL 88 CNTR - K - Pb (9→ 8) 493.675± 0.026 GALL 88 CNTR - K - Pb (11→ 10) 493.709± 0.073

262

m036.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

980) 980) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (0 + + ) See our minireview on scalar mesons under f 0 (500). (See the index for the page number.) a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS a 0 (980) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE 980± 20 OUR ESTIMATE Mass determination very model dependent η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY η π FINAL STATE ONLY VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 982.5 ± 1.6 ± 1.1 16.9k 1 AMBROSINO 09F KLOE 1.02 e + e - → η π 0 γ 986 ± 4 ANISOVICH 09 RVUE 0.0 p p, π N 982.3 + 0.6 - 0.7 + 3.1 - 4.7 2 UEHARA 09A BELL γ γ → π 0 η 987.4 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 3,4 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η 989.1 ± 1.0 ± 3.0 4,5 BUGG 08A RVUE 0 p p → π 0 π 0 η 985 ± 4 ± 6 318 ACHARD 02B L3 183-209 e + e - → e + e - η π + π - 995 + 52 - 10 36 6 ACHASOV 00F SND e + e - → η π 0 γ 994 + 33 - 8 36 7 ACHASOV

263

m011.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 (1235) I G (J PC ) = 1 + (1 + - ) b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS b 1 (1235) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE 1229.5± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. 1225 ± 5 WEIDENAUER 93 ASTE p p → 2π + 2π - π 0 1235 ± 15 ALDE 92C GAM2 38,100 π - p → ω π 0 n 1236 ± 16 FUKUI 91 SPEC 8.95 π - p → ω π 0 n 1222 ± 6 ATKINSON 84E OMEG ± 25-55 γ p → ω π X 1237 ± 7 ATKINSON 84E OMEG 0 25-55 γ p → ω π X 1239 ± 5 EVANGELIS... 81 OMEG - 12 π - p → ω π p 1251 ± 8 450 GESSAROLI 77 HBC - 11 π - p → π - ω p 1245 ± 11 890 FLATTE 76C HBC - 4.2 K - p → π - ω Σ + 1222 ± 4 1400 CHALOUPKA 74 HBC - 3.9 π - p 1220 ± 7 600 KARSHON 74B HBC + 4.9 π + p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1190 ± 10 AUGUSTIN 89 DM2 ± e + e - → 5π 1213 ± 5 ATKINSON 84C OMEG 0 20-70 γ p 1271 ± 11

264

s010.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 0 K ± I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 - ) A REVIEW GOES HERE - Check our WWW List of Reviews NODE=S010203 K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS K ± MASS NODE=S010M NODE=S010M VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT 493.677 ± 0.016 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 2.8. 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE 493.677 ± 0.013 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.4. See the ideogram below. 493.696 ± 0.007 1 DENISOV 91 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.636 ± 0.011 2 GALL 88 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.640 ± 0.054 LUM 81 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.670 ± 0.029 BARKOV 79 EMUL ± e + e - → K + K - 493.657 ± 0.020 2 CHENG 75 CNTR - Kaonic atoms 493.691 ± 0.040 BACKENSTO...73 CNTR - Kaonic atoms * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * OCCUR=2 493.631 ± 0.007 GALL 88 CNTR - K - Pb (9→ 8) OCCUR=3 493.675

265

m019.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

430) 430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 + ) See our minireview in the 1994 edition and in this edition under the f 0 (500). K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1427 ± 4 ± 13 1 BUGG 10 RVUE S-matrix pole 1466.6± 0.7 ± 3.4 141k 2 BONVICINI 08A CLEO D + → K - π + π + ∼ 1412 3 LINK 07 FOCS 0 D + → K - K + π + 1461.0± 4.0 ± 2.1 54k 4 LINK 07B FOCS D + → K - π + π + 1406 ± 29 5 BUGG 06 RVUE 1435 ± 6 6 ZHOU 06 RVUE K p → K - π + n 1455 ± 20 ± 15 ABLIKIM 05Q BES2 ψ(2S) → γ π + π - K + K - 1456 ± 8 7 ZHENG 04 RVUE K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1419 8 BUGG 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1440 9 LI 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n 1459 ± 9 15k 10 AITALA 02 E791 D + → K - π + π + ∼ 1440 11 JAMIN 00 RVUE K p → K p 1436 ± 8 12 BARBERIS 98E OMEG 450

266

m012.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a a 2 (1320) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (2 + + ) a 2 (1320) MASS a 2 (1320) MASS a 2 (1320) MASS a 2 (1320) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE 1318.3 + 0.5 - 0.6 OUR AVERAGE Includes data from the 4 datablocks that follow this one. Error includes scale factor of 1.2. 3π MODE 3π MODE 3π MODE 3π MODE VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT The data in this block is included in the average printed for a previous datablock. 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE 1319.0 + 1.0 - 1.3 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below. 1321 ± 1 + 0 - 7 420k ALEKSEEV 10 COMP 190 π - P b → π - π - π + Pb ' 1326 ± 2 ± 2 CHUNG 02 B852 18.3 π - p → π + π - π - p 1317 ± 3 BARBERIS 98B 450 p p → p f π + π - π 0 p s 1323 ± 4 ± 3 ACCIARRI 97T L3 e + e - → e + e - π + π - π 0 1320 ± 7 ALBRECHT 97B ARG e + e - → e

267

m018.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 K ∗ (892) I (J P ) = 1 2 (1 - ) K ∗ (892) MASS K ∗ (892) MASS K ∗ (892) MASS K ∗ (892) MASS NODE=M018205 CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED NODE=M018M1 NODE=M018M1 VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 891.66 ± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 892.6 ± 0.5 5840 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC - 8.25 K - p → K 0 π - p 888 ± 3 NAPIER 84 SPEC + 200 π - p → 2K 0 S X OCCUR=2 891 ± 1 NAPIER 84 SPEC - 200 π - p → 2K 0 S X 891.7 ± 2.1 3700 BARTH 83 HBC + 70 K + p → K 0 π + X 891 ± 1 4100 TOAFF 81 HBC - 6.5 K - p → K 0 π - p 892.8 ± 1.6 AJINENKO 80 HBC + 32 K + p → K 0 π + X 890.7 ± 0.9 1800 AGUILAR-... 78B HBC ± 0.76 p p → K ∓ K 0 S π ± 886.6 ± 2.4 1225 BALAND 78 HBC ± 12 p p → (K π) ± X 891.7 ± 0.6 6706 COOPER 78 HBC ± 0.76 p p → (K π) ± X 891.9 ± 0.7 9000 1 PALER 75 HBC - 14.3 K - p → (K π) - X

268

m019.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 K ∗ 0 (1430) I (J P ) = 1 2 (0 + ) See our minireview in the 1994 edition and in this edition under the NODE=M019 f 0 (500). K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS K ∗ 0 (1430) MASS NODE=M019M NODE=M019M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE 1425 ± 50 OUR ESTIMATE → UNCHECKED ← * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1427 ± 4 ± 13 1 BUGG 10 RVUE S-matrix pole 1466.6 ± 0.7 ± 3.4 141k 2 BONVICINI 08A CLEO D + → K - π + π + ∼ 1412 3 LINK 07 FOCS 0 D + → K - K + π + 1461.0 ± 4.0 ± 2.1 54k 4 LINK 07B FOCS D + → K - π + π + 1406 ± 29 5 BUGG 06 RVUE 1435 ± 6 6 ZHOU 06 RVUE K p → K - π + n 1455 ± 20 ± 15 ABLIKIM 05Q BES2 ψ(2S) → γ π + π - K + K - 1456 ± 8 7 ZHENG 04 RVUE K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1419 8 BUGG 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n ∼ 1440 9 LI 03 RVUE 11 K - p → K - π + n 1459 ± 9 15k 10 AITALA 02 E791 D + → K - π + π + ∼

269

BGE_Comments_CurrentComms.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reading (based Reading (based on hourly reads) Cellular network 5000 30 minutes 19.2K >90% <15 sec >95% 4 1 2 Direct Load Control 22 250K 8 hours 1K 100% <120 sec >99% 2 1 2 Real time pricing At the customer premises At charging stations 53 1755 8 hours 9600 bps >90% 5 sec <5 per mo. >95% 5 2 1 CBC-5000 2330 CBC-7000 1621 LVC N/A 638 4 hours N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A See comment See comment N/A N/A Customer Calls N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Applications Distributed Generation Management in-Home Display of Customer Usage Automated Feeder Switching Transformer Monitoring Voltage and Current Monitoring 8 hours 1K >60% Capacitor Bank Control Fault Current Indicator 10 sec >99% 4 1 2 Quantified Estimates Ranking of Relative Importance of Each Estimated Number of End Point Devices to

270

Comments of Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Utilities Telecom Council Utilities Telecom Council Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Urgent action is needed to address utilities communications needs. Utilities and other CII are deploying smart grid and making investments in communications upgrades now. Promoting access to spectrum will accelerate the deployment of smart grid and other CII communications, which will in turn promote larger public policy goals for energy independence, infrastructure security, environmental quality and public safety. Therefore, UTC looks forward to working with the DOE, as well as the FCC and NTIA to support the communications needs of utilities and other CII. Comments of Utilities Telecom Council More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

271

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response to U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (Jul. 27, 2010) and 75 Fed. Reg. 51986 (Aug. 24, 2010). Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation More Documents & Publications DOE Notice of Inquiry on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) Contingent Cost Allocation - March 2, 2011 Meeting

272

Comments of the American Petroleum Institute | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the American Petroleum Institute the American Petroleum Institute Comments of the American Petroleum Institute Similar to the electric utility industry's implementation of smart grid, oil and natural gas companies are in the midst of transitioning to next generation communications technology that will provide significant benefits in terms of safety, incident response, effectiveness and efficiency that are critical to United States energy independence. At the same time, however, API's members find themselves increasingly constrained by the lack of exclusive, licensed spectrum available for higher-speed applications. Comments of the American Petroleum Institute More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

273

Comments of the American Petroleum Institute | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Petroleum Institute Petroleum Institute Comments of the American Petroleum Institute Similar to the electric utility industry's implementation of smart grid, oil and natural gas companies are in the midst of transitioning to next generation communications technology that will provide significant benefits in terms of safety, incident response, effectiveness and efficiency that are critical to United States energy independence. At the same time, however, API's members find themselves increasingly constrained by the lack of exclusive, licensed spectrum available for higher-speed applications. Comments of the American Petroleum Institute More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements

274

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute The Edison Electric Institute ("EEI"), on behalf of its member companies, hereby submits the following comments in response to the request by the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") for information on a wide range of issues dealing with Smart Grid technology, applications, consumer interaction, policy initiatives and economic impacts, including the definition of Smart Grid; interactions with and implications for residential, commercial and industrial customers; Smart Grid costs and benefits; collaboration between utilities, device manufacturers and energy

275

Detroit Edison Comments on NRC Guidance for Operability Determinations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

with the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in the preparation of industry comments on the draft revision to NRC Manual Chapter 9900. Detroit Edison appreciates the efforts by NRC staff to update and clarify the guidance for operability determinations and the opportunity to provide comments prior to final issuance. Detroit Edison concurs with the specific comments on the referenced Federal Register notice provided by NEI and the associated recommendation that the NRC continue public dialogue on this topic. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (734) 586-4258. Sincerely, Norman K. Peterson

Detroit Edison; Washington D C; Detroit Edison; Has Participated

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Comments of the American Wind Energy Associ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the American Wind Energy Association in response to the Department of Energy's of the American Wind Energy Association in response to the Department of Energy's solicitation for comments on the upcoming National Electric Transmission Congestion Study I. AWEA strongly believes that the Department of Energy (DOE) should permit transmission developers to propose "project-specific" corridors, which would allow DOE to designate corridors upon request at any time anywhere in the Lower 48 states if a developer can demonstrate that its proposed corridor meets the criteria for such a designation. This would be an additional improvement beyond the process that has been publicly discussed as DOE's plan, in which DOE would take the lead in identifying any areas where power flows are

277

FINAL-west-doe-rfi-comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October October 31, 2013 Mr. Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects, Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53436 (Aug. 29, 2013) Dear Mr. Lawrence: I. INTRODUCTION Western Energy Supply and Transmission Associates ("WEST") 1 respectfully submits these comments in response to the questions raised in the above-referenced Department of Energy (DOE) Request for Information (RFI). This RFI addresses the proposed pre-application process for siting of transmission projects requiring interagency

278

April 1-10 comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

David David Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:02 AM To: contractor pensions Subject: Hanford The Department of Energy is seeking public comment regarding the funding of pension and health care benefits for workers on DOE sites. Why is DOE only now concerned with this? I work at the Hanford Reservation in Washington State. I've been here for fifteen years. In 1987, a multi-contractor pension system was negotiated with the union and the contractors. Prior to this, there were multiple pension plans due to the multiple contractors performing work for DOE. The multi-employer plan was designed to save money for DOE. A detailed cost analysis was conveyed to DOE-Headquarters that showed what the plan would cost to fund through 2012. DOE-Headquarters

279

Federal Registry Comments May 25 2007.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

tn6562 tn6562 Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:17 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Continue Support of Pensions for SRS Retirees As the contract for SRS changes hands I want to thank you for your continued support of the SRS retirees pensions and medical benefit's. For the past ten years I have depended upon these benefits for my support and welfare. This is a very important issue of which I have great concern. Your attention in incorporating existing pension and medical benefits into the new contract is appreciated. Thank you Thomas S Mann, retiree -----Original Message----- From: Madden, Daniel Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 5:37 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Late comment DOE should act aggressively to end defined benefit pensions. I was surprised to see that

280

Paducah DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Volume 2: Comment and Response Document: Chapters 3 and 4: Responses to Comments and References  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Paducah DUF Paducah DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS 3 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This section provides DOE's responses to comments received during the public comment period. Indices of the DOE responses are provided by document number (Table 3.1), by commentors' last name (Table 3.2), and by commentors' company/organization (Table 3.3). Most of the comments received apply to both the Portsmouth and the Paducah conversion facility EISs. However, there are some comment documents that apply specifically to one EIS or the other. An index of comment documents indicating their applicability to each EIS is given in Table 3.4. Table 3.5 lists only those comment documents that apply to the Portsmouth EIS, and Table 3.6 lists those comment documents that apply to the Paducah EIS. Table 3.7 lists the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available April 3, 2012 - 2:12pm Addthis On October 5, 2011, the White House announced the creation of a Rapid Response Team for Transmission (RRTT). In support of the RRTT the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability released a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. The Request for Information focused on making the development times for generation and transmission more commensurate with one another. Public comments received from the following organizations are now available for review and downloading. - Allegheny Highlands Alliance - American Electric Power

282

Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community Relations Plan  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Last saved on: 7/22/2011 Final CRP comment for June 2011 1 SECTION TEXT COMMENT POST? GENERAL COMMENTS N/A We urge the DOE, NNSA and LANL to establish a community calendar so that the various LANL organizations who are scheduling public meetings are aware of other community events, such as the public comment periods on various documents, including PMRs, semi-annual meetings (e.g., CMRR and storm water permit meetings), Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board meetings, RACER, New Mexico Community Foundation FEED meetings, tours, etc. Such a community calendar would be an efficient and effective way to reduce the back and forth about the need for extensions of time and requests to reschedule meetings. It

283

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment March 15, 2013 - 11:08am Addthis Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment DOE has issued the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS)(DOE/EIS-0472D) for public review and comment. The document is available here and on the ULP PEIS website. Under the Uranium Leasing Program, the DOE Office of Legacy Management administers 31 tracts of land in Mesa, Montrose, and San Miguel counties that are leased to private entities to mine uranium and vanadium. The program covers an area of approximately 25,000 acres. No mining operations are active on the ULP lands at this time. DOE is preparing the ULP PEIS to

284

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-07-02: Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") has reviewed the Special Environmental Analysis ("SEA") referenced above, dated November, 2006, and is providing the following brief comments for your consideration as the Department of Energy ("DOE") continues to evaluate the operating status of the Potomac River

285

Microsoft Word - AppendixH_CommentResponse.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NFSS Vicinity Property Report NFSS Vicinity Property Report October 2010 Doc. No. S06246 Page H-1 Responsiveness Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, New York: Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties and Two Drainage Ditches on April 23, 2010, for public comment. Report availability was announced through a message to stakeholders sent on behalf of DOE by USACE. The announcement provided a 30-day comment period, closing on March 19, 2010. DOE extended the comment period to June 14, 2010, in response to multiple requests for additional time to review FUSRAP documentation. Twenty comments were received, of which five were from one stakeholder and two from

286

Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No. EO-05-01. Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve the Potomac River Substation on January 9, 2006. Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed

287

DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Certification and Enforcement Notice Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking October 15, 2010 - 10:22am Addthis In response to a formal request, the Department has extended to October 29, 2010, the deadline for submission of comments in response to the Notice or Proposed Rulemaking on the certification and enforcement of the Department's energy conservation standards. (75 FR 56796). The signed extension provided here will be published shortly in the Federal Register. Addthis Related Articles DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act Department of Energy Issues Final Rule on Loan Guarantees

288

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines.

289

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site September 1, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Tim Jackson 208-526-8484 The U.S. Department of Energy invites the public to read and comment on a draft environmental assessment it has prepared, for a proposal to provide a replacement capability for continued disposal of remote-handled low-level radioactive waste that is generated at the Idaho National Laboratory site.

290

Microsoft Word - PMI Comments on DOE Guidance.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead" Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016 Pursuant to discussions with the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of the General Counsel, which has permitted this filing to be made after the original deadline for submission of comments, the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI) respectfully submits these supplemental comments regarding the economic impacts of the DOE's draft interpretation of the term "showerhead" in 10 C.F.R. § 430.2 (the "Interpretive Rule"). INTRODUCTION In its prior submissions, PMI argued that DOE's proposed Interpretive Rule should be subject to the rulemaking procedures in the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), and that the

291

DOE Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low-Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site DOE Media Advisory - DOE extends public comment period on Draft Environmental Assessment for Replacement Capability for Disposal of Remote-Handled Low-Level Radioactive Waste Generated at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Site October 13, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Tim Jackson 208-526-8484 In response to requests from people interested in National Environmental Policy Act activities occurring at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Operations Office, the department has extended the public comment period that began September 1 on the Draft Environmental Assessment for

292

DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations DOE Announces Additional Public Comment Meetings for Draft National Corridor Designations May 8, 2007 - 11:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that it will hold four additional public meetings for the two draft National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (National Corridors) during the 60-day public comment period, which will close on July 6, 2007. The four additional meetings will be held in June in: Phoenix, Arizona; Las Vegas, Nevada; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Rochester, New York. Dates and locations will be published in the Federal Register in the coming days. DOE previously announced it would host three public meetings at the

293

Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") in the above-captioned docket on February 17, 2006, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits these Comments to provide the DOE and all interested parties with the information regarding the DCPSC's recent efforts to facilitate compliance with the DOE directives issued in this proceeding and to ensure that adequate supplies of electricity continue to exist to serve our Nation's capital. Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission More Documents & Publications Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or,

294

Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") in the above-captioned docket on December 20, 2005 ("December 20 Order"), and Section 313 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), 16 U.S.C. § 8251, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits its preliminary comments on the compliance plan ("Compliance Plan") proposed by MiranT Potomac River,

295

Grid Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129 2010 Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129 2010 DOE RFI 2010-11129 NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Titled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy" Submitted by Grid Net, Inc. July 12, 2010 Attention: Maureen C. McLaughlin, Senior Legal Advisor to the General Counsel Grid Net, Inc. Comments to DOE RFI 2010-11129 2010 Summary and Highlights Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments for the Department of Energy RFI 2010-11129, our detailed responses to your questions are below for your consideration. The key points we'd like to get

296

Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Smart Grid » Smart Grid Smart Grid » Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments As part of its ongoing effort regarding the formation of smart grid policy, the Department of Energy issued a Request for Information in September of 2010 on the topic of "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." The purpose was to solicit comments from interested stakeholders on policy and logistical challenges that confront smart grid implementation, and recommendations on how to best overcome those challenges. The comments and recommendations will help inform the Department and the Administration's analysis of policy challenges and possible solutions being developed by the Smart Grid Subcommittee of the National Science and

297

City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of Energy Emergency Order, Operating Plan by Mirant and Proposed Special Environmental Analysis City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of Energy Emergency Order, Operating Plan by Mirant and Proposed Special Environmental Analysis Docket No. EO-05-01: The City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") hereby submits the following comments in response to the notice of emergency action published in the Federal Register on January 20, 2006 by the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") entitled "Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, V A, in Response to Electricity Reliability Concerns in Washington, D.C." (71 Fed.

298

Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment by Cameco Resources On Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (July 27, 2010), Section 934 Rule Making. As discussed below, Cameco believes that producers and providers of uranium concentrates and UF6 conversion services, whether directly or as an intermediary, should be excluded from the definition of nuclear supplier. In this regard, Cameco generally agrees with the comments submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute ("NEI") on behalf of its members; however, Cameco disagrees with the implication of NEl's comments that producers of uranium concentrates and providers of conversion services should be included in the

299

Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 November 17, 2005 - 2:49pm Addthis Workshop is first step to develop regulation for risk insurance for nuclear plants WASHINGTON, DC -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that a workshop to receive public comments on the "standby support" provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 has been scheduled for December 15, 2005. The workshop is the first step in developing a regulation for risk insurance for nuclear power plants and will be held from 8:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. and from 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. at the Marriott Residence Inn in Bethesda, Maryland. Standby support, or, "risk insurance," for new nuclear power plants is a

300

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials November 12, 2013 - 4:33pm Addthis Tim Jackson Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office The U.S. Department of Energy invites the public to read and comment on a draft environmental assessment it has prepared for a proposal to resume transient testing of nuclear fuels and materials at either Idaho National Laboratory (INL) or Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Transient testing involves placing fuel or material into the core of a nuclear reactor and subjecting it to short bursts of intense, high-power

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. The Alliance to Save Energy is a coalition of prominent business, government, environmental, and consumer leaders who promote the efficient use of energy worldwide to benefit consumers, the environment, economy, and national security. The Alliance to Save Energy (the Alliance) thanks the Department of Energy for the opportunity to comment on broad issues of policy and logistical challenges faced in smart grid implementation. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. Comments of the Alliance to Save Energy. More Documents & Publications

302

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(CII). The comments on the record- including those by APPA, EEI and NRECA, as well as API - strongly support utility access to licensed spectrum in order to support smart grid...

303

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

304

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of 2009. 74 Fed. Reg. 9391-9393 (Mar. 4, 2009). Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of Horizon Wind Energy LLC ("Horizon"), I am pleased to submit comments on Western Area Power...

305

Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a...

306

Comments of the Western Interstate Energy Board's High-Level...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Counsel's Notice of Inquiry concerning the preparation of a report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act. Comments of the Western Interstate Energy Board's High-Level Radioactive...

307

Comments in response to FERC rulemaking on regional transmission organizations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

On May 13, 1999, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) on Regional Transmission Organizations (RTO). The purpose of the NOPR is to solicit comments on proposed FERC ...

Joskow, Paul L.

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison...

309

Public Comment re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of 2007 Public Comment by the Uranium Producers of America (UPA) re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). The UPA urges DOE to clarify the...

310

Technical Comments on EPA's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents EPRIs technical comments on EPAs April 20, 2011 proposed Rule implementing the requirements of the Clean Water Acts 316(b) for existing facilities with cooling water intake structures.

2011-09-13T23:59:59.000Z

311

Comments of National Grid to the Smart Grid RFI | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Grid to the Smart Grid RFI Comments of National Grid to the Smart Grid RFI National Grid's Response to the Department of Energy Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and...

312

DOE Notice of inquiry and request for comment.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE is seeking comment and information from the public to assist in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Act). Section...

313

Town of Danvers Comment on Information Collection Extension  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Town of Danvers provided comments to the Department of Energy's notice of intent to seek approval of an extension ofInformation Collection 1910-5149 for Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment...

314

DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead May 19, 2010 - 12:59pm Addthis Today the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register an interpretive rule that sets out the Department's views on the definition of "showerhead" in 10 CFR 430.2. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here. The draft interpretive rule clarifies that a showerhead is any plumbing fitting that is designed to direct water onto a bather regardless of the shape, size, placement, or number of sprays or openings that it may have. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Withdraws Interpretive Rule and Provides Enforcement Guidance on

315

Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies As part of its ongoing effort to assist in the formation of policies that will govern the integration of broadband technologies with the Smart Grid, the DOE General Counsel's office issued two Requests for Information (RFIs) in May of 2010. The first RFI was issued to solicit comments from electric utilities, consumer groups, and other stakeholders on ongoing federal, state, and private efforts to protect consumer energy usage data. The second RFI was issued to assist the Department in studying the present and future communications needs of electric utilities as Smart Grid technologies are deployed more broadly across the country. Smart Grid RFI Press Release (May 11, 2010)

316

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comments for modification of the Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry(NOI) by the Board of Mineral County Commissioners. The provisions covered by the current Act should, at the very least, be maintained. We are concerned that if the DOE Price-Anderson indemnification is not continued, we will not have the proper protection should a severe accident occur when spent nuclear fuel is transported through our community on its way to Yucca Mountain. The maintaining of the DOE PriceAnderson indemnification becomes even more important with the privatization of the OC RWM transportation program. DOE cannot expect private contractors, and in particular carriers, to be able to afford adequate coverage from a private insurer.

317

Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI Comment Extension  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This notice announces that the period for submitting comments on the Department of Energys (DOE) request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ...

318

Reply to Comments on Preconditioning Deep Convection with Cumulus Congestus  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In his comment, D. M. Schultz asked for clarification concerning (i) the validity of the results of C. Hohenegger and B. Stevens for the development of convection over the midlatitudes and (ii) the exact meaning and computation of the term ...

Cathy Hohenegger; Bjorn Stevens

2013-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

NR-WFR Plan for Comment July 8 2013.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Monday, July 8, 2013 Monday, July 8, 2013 Bill Taylor - 803-952-8564 bill.taylor@srs.gov Public Comment Sought for Savannah River Site Workforce Restructuring Plan AIKEN, SC -- The Department of Energy Savannah River Site (DOE-SR) has posted a draft workforce restructuring plan for public comment. The draft workforce restructuring plan, prepared under Section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act, is designed to mitigate

320

EPRI Comments on Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines Rule  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On September 20, 2013, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) submitted comments to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on its proposed Effluent Guidelines rule.[1] The proposed rule aims to reduce the amount of toxic metals and other constituents discharged to surface waters from power plants. EPRIs comments to EPA address fundamental scientific and technical questions about the cost-effectiveness of proposed flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater treatment, the ...

2013-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada (DOE/EIS-0426). The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011 rather than October 27, 2011. EIS-0426-DEIS-CommentExtension-2011.pdf EIS-0426-DEIS-NoticeofCommentExtension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Comment Period

322

EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Period for the Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and Off-Site Locations in Nevada (DOE/EIS-0426). The formal comment period will close on December 2, 2011 rather than October 27, 2011. EIS-0426-DEIS-CommentExtension-2011.pdf EIS-0426-DEIS-NoticeofCommentExtension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0426: Notice of Extension of Comment Period

323

Solar market studies: review and comment  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes and comments on relevant solar energy market surveys and related studies to provide a basis for determining areas requiring additional research and possible policies and actions to aid in rapid adoption of solar technologies. Thirty-two studies are discussed. The first 19 studies directly assess the market for residential use of solar domestic hot water, space, and pool heating. Studies 20 and 21 inspect energy conservation surveys. Studies 22 and 23 examine the financial incentives and financial institutions in the expanding solar market. Study 24 considers energy and low-income people. Studies 25 and 26 assess market sizes for photovoltaic systems and wind machines. Studies 27 to 30 are not surveys per se, but represent secondary source and modeling efforts to gain understanding of the solar marketplace. Studies 31 and 32 present the Canadian perspective on the market feasibility of solar energy systems. Many of the studies contained flaws of concept and/or method to a degree that would bring into question the credibility of individual findings but, taken as an aggregrate, they provide a useful compendium of opinion about present and potential solar energy users.

Vories, R; Strong, H

1980-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Property:NEPA Resource Comment | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comment Comment Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA Resource Comment Property Type Text Description Comment on the analysis of a potential impact to a NEPA resource Subproperties This property has the following 4 subproperties: D DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091#NEPAImpact_with_Wild_Horse_and_Burro_Management DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091#NEPAImpact_with_Recreation DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091 DOI-BLM-NV-063-EA08-091#NEPAImpact_with_Paleontological_Resources Pages using the property "NEPA Resource Comment" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Prime_or_Unique_Farmlands + The proposed project is not located in or near any prime or unique farmlands (BLM WFO 2002). BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Wilderness + The proposed project is not in or adjacent to any wilderness area (BLM WFO 2002).

325

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS May 28, 2013 - 5:37pm Addthis Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS The U.S. Department of Energy is re-opening the public comment period for the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft ULP PEIS, DOE/EIS-0472D). DOE made the Draft ULP PEIS available for public comment on March 15, 2013 (78 FR 16500). The public comment period for the Draft ULP PEIS originally was to end on May 16, 2013, and an extension to May 31, 2013 was announced on April 23, 2013 (78 FR 23926). In response to a public request for additional review time, DOE re-opens the public comment period, which will now close on July 1,

326

University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry The University appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Inquiry (NOI) concerning preparation of a report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act. The NOI poses a number of questions that attempt to identify potential issues that might arise in developing the report. The University includes its general comments in this letter and offers its responses to the specific questions in an attachment. University of California Comments on Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry More Documents & Publications Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of

327

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses. Editorial comments and general observations were considered, but are not listed in the responses below unless they involved a significant clarification to the DOE Challenge Home provisions. DOE is not responsible for any typographical errors or omissions.

328

Reply to comment on Perfect drain for the Maxwell fish eye lens  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We reply to the comments on our paper Perfect Drain for the Maxwell fish eye lens (NJP 13 (2011) 023038) made by Fei Sun. We believe that Sun comments have several mistakes in theoretical concepts and simulation results.

Gonzalez, Juan C; Minnano, Juan C; Grabovickic, Dejan

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide19 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 12:13 FY2008-stip speeches FY2008-stip Slide19 Here's how it works . . . Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

330

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide22 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 12:13 FY2008-stip speeches FY2008-stip Slide22 WorldWideScience.org Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

331

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide08 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 07:14 FY2010-STIP-Warnick Slide08 Transactions Over Time Transactions by Citizens and Scientists Add new comment...

332

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

to comment Slide16 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:11 quicktabs-title FY2005-stip Slide16 SC e-journals "We have a proposal" . . . Sharon Add new comment Original...

333

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide14 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:45 quicktabs-title FY2006-icsti Slide14 Example of International Federated Searching Add new comment Thumbnail...

334

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide13 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:25 quicktabs-title FY2006-lowg Slide13 Partnerships Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340 Icon64x64...

335

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide08 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:45 quicktabs-title FY2006-icsti Slide08 No time for "door-to-door" searching Add new comment Thumbnail...

336

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide11 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:45 quicktabs-title FY2006-icsti Slide11 Energy Technology Data Exchange Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

337

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide02 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:25 quicktabs-title FY2006-lowg Slide02 Administrative News Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

338

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide04 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:25 quicktabs-title FY2006-lowg Slide04 OSTI is a component of the DOE Office of Science. Add new comment...

339

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide20 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:25 quicktabs-title FY2006-lowg Slide20 DOE Fugitive Document Project Conceptual Approach Add new comment...

340

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide07 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:45 quicktabs-title FY2006-icsti Slide07 Got documents? Need discovery? Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide06 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:25 quicktabs-title FY2006-lowg Slide06 Budget and Staffing Over Time Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

342

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide05 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 12:25 quicktabs-title FY2006-lowg Slide05 OSTI Leadership and Staff Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

343

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide22 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide22 Precise, Accurate Results Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340 Icon64x64...

344

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide15 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 07:29 FY2010-cendi-jordan Slide15 www.osti.govbridge Author and subject clusters Word Clouds Add new comment...

345

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide23 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 14:12 FY2009-jordan Slide23 Questions? Comments? Sharon Jordan Assistant Director DOESC OSTI Operating Agent for...

346

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide31 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide31 Future Opportunities What will Science.gov 10.0 look like? Add new comment Original...

347

GE to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Alliance Laundry Systems to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes...

348

Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Alliance Laundry Systems to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes...

349

NEHRP - Comments on Chapter 2 of the 2008-2012 Draft ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Comments on Chapter 2 of the 20082012 Draft Strategic Plan (15 ... Comment (page 10, line 4): This does not seem to be the correct word for the title ...

350

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide01 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-23 08:36 FY2012-GreyLit Slide01 Science-Forums.net Communities for Science Colleagues Tweet Comments or Questions:...

351

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide01 Submitted by gibsone on Wed, 2013-08-21 11:09 FY2007-cendi Slide01 The Stage Is Set for the Future CENDI Meeting September 2007 Add new comment Original...

352

LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers LG response...

353

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

models and simulations - Scientific images (static) - Scientific multimedia (audio, video, animations) - Specialized mix (primarily for genomic collections) Add new comment...

354

West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment March 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor (513) 246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov West Valley, New York - The U.S. Department of Energy today released a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation of a vitrification melter at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) for review and comment by the public, states and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This draft evaluation shows that the melter meets the criteria for "waste incidental to reprocessing" and may be managed and disposed of as low-level radioactive waste (LLW). It is an important step in DOE's efforts to clean up the WVDP and meet its obligations under the WVDP Act of

355

Comments of the American Public Power Association | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Power Association Public Power Association Comments of the American Public Power Association In response to the U.S. Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") published May 11, 2010 in the Federal Register,1 the American Public Power Association ("APPA") hereby submits its comments in response to questions on data access, third party use, and privacy as related to the implementation of smart grid technology. Comments of the American Public Power Association More Documents & Publications Response to Request for Information from the Department of Energy: Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy [FR Doc. 2010-11127] July 12, 2010 Responses by CPower, Inc. to DOE RFI

356

Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Southern Company Services, Inc., for itself and on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and its other affiliates (collectively, "Southern"), is pleased to have this opportunity to provide responses to questions contained in the Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information

357

Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Department of Energy's Emergency on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Docket No. EO-05-01: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., submits the following comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) February 17 Order for Rehearing Emergency Order 202-05-3. District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01, Order No. 202-06-01 (Dep't of Energy, Feb. 17, 2006). Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To

358

Reply Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Verizon and Verizon Wireless Verizon and Verizon Wireless Reply Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless As Verizon noted in its opening comments in response to the Department of Energy's Request for Information (RFI), effective communications networks and services are critical to the success of Smart Grid technology. Existing commercial broadband networks built and operated by experienced communications providers would best facilitate the implementation of Smart Grid technology, which requires the highly secure transmission and processing of vast amounts of information to and from consumers and electricity producers and distributors. As evidenced by comments submitted in this proceeding, established communications providers not only are capable of meeting the communications needs of the utility sector as Smart Grid technology is implemented -

359

Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy More Documents & Publications

360

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Price-Anderson Act comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act 62 Federal Register 250. Universities Research Association, Inc. (URA) is a nonprofit corporation consisting of 87 member research universities located in the United States, Canada, Japan, and Italy.This Association strongly supports the continuation of the provisions of the Price-Anderson Act for DOE contractors and suppliers, including the exemption of Fermilab, among other named DOE national laboratories, from the payment of civil penalties under that Act. It is our experience at Fermilab that a few subcontractors/suppliers expect Price-Anderson protection and will not contract with the Laboratory without it.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Comments on Smart Grid data access | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

on Smart Grid data access on Smart Grid data access Comments on Smart Grid data access AARP, NASUCA, NCLC, Consumers Union and Public Citizen just released, "The Need for Essential Consumer Protections: Smart Metering Proposals and the Move to Time-Based Pricing." This white paper covers a range of issues including previous smart meter pilot programs, full costs associated with advanced meters and related infrastructure, and impacts of dynamic pricing on vulnerable customer groups. The paper includes 7 recommendations. Comments on Smart Grid data access More Documents & Publications AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges The Need for Essential Consumer Protections: Smart Metering Proposals and

362

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Preparation of Report to Congress on Price-Anderson Act. The Price Anderson Act should be eliminated. The Price Anderson Act assumes that the encouragement and growth of the commercial nuclear industry is in the public interest. It is not. Rational evaluation of the commercial nuclear industry forces the conclusion that the Price Anderson Act simply shields the commercial nuclear industry from costs that it would otherwise, in a fair market setting, be forced to internalize and pay. Price Anderson amounts to corporate welfare that has already caused a massive disruption of energy markets, and the abusiveness enabled by this welfare system threatens to dislodge society from its ecological as

363

Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies The Media and Technology Institute and the Climate Change Initiative at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies ("Joint Center")1 respectfully submit these comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DoE") Request for Information regarding its implementation of the Smart Grid provisions of Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC") National Broadband Plan. Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Data Access Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy- Request for

364

Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (-NRECA‖) is the national service organization representing more than 900 not-for-profit, member-owned, member-controlled rural electric Cooperatives (-Cooperatives‖). Most of NRECA's members are distribution Cooperatives, providing retail electric service to more than 42 million consumers in 47 states. NRECA members also include approximately 65 generation and transmission (-G&T‖) Cooperatives that supply wholesale

365

Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. ("On-Ramp") hereby submits comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") May 11, 2010 Request for Information as to the communications needs of electric utilities to inform federal Smart Grid policy. In these comments, On-Ramp addresses two vital aspects of the need for wireless communications in connection with Smart Grid-more specifically, for customer smart meters and devices and for certain types of distribution grid system monitoring. First, On-Ramp discusses the need to reliably link millions of customer meters and home area networks with each other and with utility access points. Second, On-Ramp discusses the importance of efficiently addressing

366

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). In the Department of Energy"s (DOE) attempt to meet its obligation to implement Executive Order 13563, ""Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,"" issued by the President on January 18, 2011, I recommend DOE make a bold move to change

367

Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. ("Southern"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE's") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, about current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities.1 Southern appreciates the opportunity to provide DOE with additional information and to respond to the initial comments submitted in this proceeding. As discussed more fully below, Southern believes that privately-owned and operated systems will continue to be needed for command and control operations. In addition, Southern is not opposed to using some commercial services for non-mission critical

368

Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy Corridors in the West Department of Energy Seeks Public Comment on Designation of Energy Corridors in the West October 21, 2005 - 9:27am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that it and several other federal agencies will host eleven public meetings to discuss the designation of multi-purpose energy corridors on federal lands in the western United States. "As our nation grows, so do our energy needs. So we must be forward looking as we map out energy transmission corridors in order to get energy to places that need it," Director of DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Kevin Kolevar said. "We want to make sure that

369

Comments of Dakota Electric Association | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Dakota Electric Association Comments of Dakota Electric Association Comments of Dakota Electric Association DEA has deployed a fully integrated IP network to 26 substation sites. An IP based network transports data information for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Load Management systems. A private Wide Area Network (WAN) was implemented by DEA in 2001 due to lack of comprehensive coverage by major carriers. In addition to the WAN, DEA relies on commercial services to communicate with load management receivers via paging technology and smart meters via phone lines. The rural environment, which covers a significant portion of our service area, and substations in particular present challenges. Carriers and telephone companies build to mass markets not the more rural area Even in

370

COMMENTS OF THE DEMAND RESPONSE AND SMART GRID COALITION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 COMMENTS OF THE DEMAND RESPONSE AND SMART GRID COALITION Department of Energy Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy July 12, 2010 The Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition (DRSG) 1 , the trade association for companies that provide products and services in the areas of demand response and smart grid technologies, respectfully submits its comments to the Department of Energy's Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy."

371

Microsoft Word - eia_elect_form_change_comments_2013  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May 6, 2013 Ms. Rebecca Peterson Energy Information Administration EI-23 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington D.C. 20585 RE: Comments on Energy Information Administration (EIA) Agency Information Collection Extension with Proposed Changes Dear Ms. Peterson: The National Mining Association (NMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on EIA's electricity information collection 3-year extension and proposed changes (Federal Register Notice, March 6, 2013, Volume 78, No. 44, Page 14521). NMA represents the interests of the nation's coal and non-fuel mineral producers; coal and mineral transporters; mining and mineral processing machinery and equipment manufacturers and suppliers;

372

WRAP 2A advanced conceptual design report comments  

SciTech Connect

This report contains the compilation of the 393 comments that were submitted during the review of the Advanced Conceptual Design Report for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Module 2A. The report was prepared by Raytheon Engineers and Constructors, Inc. of Englewood, Colorado for the United States Department of Energy. The review was performed by a variety of organizations identified in the report. The comments were addressed first by the Westinghouse cognizant engineers and then by the Raytheon cognizant engineers, and incorporated into the final issue of the Advanced Conceptual Design Report.

Lamberd, D.L.

1994-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

373

Microsoft Word - Qualcomm Comments on DOE NBP RFI v.2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DC 20585 DC 20585 In the Matter of National Broadband Plan (NBP) RFI: Communications Requirements COMMENTS OF QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Dean R. Brenner Vice President, Government Affairs John W. Kuzin Senior Director, Regulatory 1730 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 850 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 263-0020 Dated: July 12, 2010 SUMMARY Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the Federal

374

DOE O 426.1 Chg 1, Federal Technical Capability  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

To define requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a ...

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

375

DOE O 435.1 Chg 1, Radioactive Waste Management  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The objective of this Order is to ensure that all Department of Energy (DOE) radioactive waste is managed in a manner that is protective of worker and public ...

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

376

DOE O 472.2 Admin Chg 1, Personnel Security  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes requirements that will enable DOE to operate a successful, efficient, cost-effective personnel security program that will ensure ...

2011-07-27T23:59:59.000Z

377

DOE O 471.6 Admin Chg. 1, Information Security  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The protection and control of classified information is critical to our nation??s security. This Order establishes requirements and responsibilities for ...

2011-06-20T23:59:59.000Z

378

Comments on "Structure and Stability of Certain Chemical Networks  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

IEEE TAC 1 Comments on "Structure and Stability of Certain Chemical Networks and Applications and applications to the kinetic proofreading model of T-cell re- ceptor signal transduction," IEEE Trans. Autom to the Kinetic Proofreading Model of T-Cell Receptor Signal Transduction" Eduardo D. Sontag Abstract-- A lemma

Sontag, Eduardo

379

Response to ISRP Comments Monitoring and Evaluation Statistical Support  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Ifyou prorate the costs by number of daily users, this project compares even more favorably from a cost BPA Project No. 199105100 ISRP Preliminary Comments a. A response related to monitoring and evaluation and subtasks. Performance of the project is measured, in part, on the timely and on-budget completion

380

Comment on "Quantum Control and Entanglement in a Chemical Compass"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this comment we show that the avian compass entanglement considerations of J. Cai, G. G. Guerreschi and H. J. Briegel (Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 220502 (2010)) result in unphysical predictions on the magnetic sensitivity of this biochemical sensor. As well known, not taking into account decoherence results in an overestimated measurement precision, and this is the case at hand.

Kominis, I K

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Comments on "Modelling the gap size distribution of parked cars"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this Comment we discuss some points concerning the modeling of parked cars proposed in the article by Rawal and Rodgers, Physica A (2005). We also introduce another approach to this problem which leads to a better description of the empirical data collected by the authors.

Girardi, Mauricio

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

Draft for Public Comment Appendix A. Demand Forecast  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Draft for Public Comment A-1 Appendix A. Demand Forecast INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY A 20-year forecast of electricity demand is a required component of the Council's Northwest Regional Conservation had a tradition of acknowledging the uncertainty of any forecast of electricity demand and developing

383

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY The Michigan Public Service Commission Staff (MPSC Staff) commends the Department of Energy for seeking comments on policy and challenges confronting smart grid deployments as stated in the Request for Information (RFI) addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from

384

Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act Comments from the State of Nevada on the December 31, 1997 Federal Register "Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act." Comments from Nevada to Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act More Documents & Publications Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comments of the Western Interstate Energy Board's High-Level Radioactive Waste Committee on the Department of Energy Office of General Counsel's Notice of Inquiry concerning the preparation of a report to Congress on the

385

DOE Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries DOE Grid Tech Team Issues Request for Public Comments on Workshop Summaries February 21, 2013 - 2:35pm Addthis DOE's Grid Tech Team issued a notice of availability and request for comments on the Electrical Grid Integration Technical Workshop summaries. Public comments on summaries from the distribution system and transmission system workshops will be accepted until March 25, 2013. The complete Federal Register Notice, including details on how to submit comments, is available for download. Addthis Related Articles DOE Convenes Multi-stakeholder Process to Address Privacy for Data Enabled by Smart Grid Technologies Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring

386

BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NEWS RELEASE Release Date: 04/15/11 Contacts: David Quick, (202) 912-7413 BLM Announces Second Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft Solar PEIS The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) today announced a two-week extension of the public comment period for the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Solar PEIS), a joint effort with the Department of Energy. The agencies had previously provided for a 120-day public comment period on the Draft Solar PEIS. Because of numerous requests, the agencies are extending the comment period by an additional two weeks beyond April 16, 2011. The comment period will now run until May 2, 2011. No additional public meetings will be held during the

387

GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comment on Application (Optional) Comment on Application (Optional) < GRR‎ | Elements Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections 14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) The DOGGR Regional Board receives the option to comment on the application prior to the issuance of a Draft Project Approval Letter for review. The DOGGR Regional Board shall furnish any comments to the DOGGR State Board within 14 days of the applicant submitting the application. Logic Chain No Parents \V/ GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) (this page) \V/ No Dependents Under Development Add.png Add an Element Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6_-_Comment_on_Application_(Optional)&oldid=539608

388

Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is re-opening the public comment period for proposed amendments to its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), made available for public comment on January 3, 2011 (76 FR 214). This is being done in response to a request on behalf of multiple organizations CX rulemaking files More Documents & Publications Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Federal Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico

389

Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No. 99-1 Ontario Power Generation Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No. 99-1 Ontario Power Generation hereby moves to intervene in, and comments on, the DOE's proposed open access requirements for International Electric Transmission Facilities. Ontario Power Company Motion to Intervene & Comments in FE Docket No. 99-1 More Documents & Publications Motion to Intervene and Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Joint Motion to Intervene of Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) et

390

Feedback from Student Comments Thank you for your participation in our on-line surveys & Quick Comment Card options. We  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

comments, Student Health Services, which includes the Medical Clinic, Counseling and Psychological Services an evaluation and bringing it directly to the Student Health Center Laboratory without a physical examination by a health care provider Some services can be accomplished on-line, like your initial Education Abroad

California at Santa Cruz, University of

391

Citation: D.E. Groom  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

GeV for the MS mass corresponds to 4.5-4.9 GeV for the pole mass (see the "Note on Quark Masses"). VALUE (GeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 4.0 to 4.4 OUR EVALUATION 4.0 to 4.4...

392

m056.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

c0 (1P) MASS NODEM056M NODEM056M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 3414.75 0.31 OUR AVERAGE 3414.75 0.31 OUR AVERAGE 3414.75 0.31 OUR AVERAGE 3414.75 ...

393

Microsoft Word - WBRT_Comments_WAPA_TIP_FINAL.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Blvd, #105 | Lakewood, Colo. 80228 | 303-384-9911 f: 303-496-0334 Blvd, #105 | Lakewood, Colo. 80228 | 303-384-9911 f: 303-496-0334 info@westernroundtable.com | www.westernroundtable.com The opinions expressed in this letter represent the views of a majority of Roundtable Members, but not necessarily all of our members. April 3, 2009 Transmission Infrastructure Program Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Re: Western Area Power Administration's ("WAPA") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments on its adoption of a Transmission Infrastructure Program Dear Sir/Madam: The Western Business Roundtable ("Roundtable") is responding to Western Area Power Administration's ("WAPA") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments on

394

Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ORNL Tech transfer.txt ORNL Tech transfer.txt From: Doug Lawyer [dlawyer@knoxvillechamber.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:40 PM To: GC-62 Cc: Rhonda Rice Subject: Comments on ORNL Tech transfer Attachments: image001.jpg I understand that DOE is accepting comments on technology transfer initiatives in your federal national labs. Here's some thoughts on tech transfer at ORNL: * One of the key economic development strategies of Knox County, Tennessee, which sits in a region we call The Innovation Valley, involves Technology transfer from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is a focus of our daily economic development efforts through a program we call Technology Mining and Matching. We have a strong connection with ORNL and its partnerships division. * During the eight years that UT-Battelle LLC has managed ORNL, we

395

Comments of Space Data Corporation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Space Data Corporation Space Data Corporation Comments of Space Data Corporation Space Data is the leader in high altitude balloon borne communications platforms where between 65-100,000 feet we have flown over 20,000 commercial SkySite® flights totaling over 250,000 flight hours as well as supply the military with our StarFighter® platform which extends 2 way radio communications from under 10 miles to over 400 miles. We were founded in 1999 and to develop our technology we decided that the ReFlex paging protocol was appropriate and that FCC licensed spectrum was available. Hence we participated in FCC Auctions 40, 41 and 50 and through secondary market transactions accumulated almost 2 of the 3 MHz allocated to Narrowband PCS (NPCS) in the 901/930/940 MHz bands. Comments of Space Data Corporation

396

Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from The National Association of Regulatory Utility from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on this Request for Information (RFI) regarding the policy and logistical challenges of the smart grid. The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). More Documents & Publications RE: NBP RFI: Data Access In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid; Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy, 75 Federal Register 33611 (June 14, 2010).

397

Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan Docket No. EO-05-01: Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy's December 20, 2005 Emergency Order 202-05-3 and on Mirant's proposed Compliance Plan filed pursuant to that Order. Dep't of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA, in Response to Electricity Reliability Concerns in Washington, D.C., 71 Fed. Reg. 3279 (Jan. 20, 2006).

398

Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ORNL Tech transfer.txt ORNL Tech transfer.txt From: Doug Lawyer [dlawyer@knoxvillechamber.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:40 PM To: GC-62 Cc: Rhonda Rice Subject: Comments on ORNL Tech transfer Attachments: image001.jpg I understand that DOE is accepting comments on technology transfer initiatives in your federal national labs. Here's some thoughts on tech transfer at ORNL: * One of the key economic development strategies of Knox County, Tennessee, which sits in a region we call The Innovation Valley, involves Technology transfer from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is a focus of our daily economic development efforts through a program we call Technology Mining and Matching. We have a strong connection with ORNL and its partnerships division. * During the eight years that UT-Battelle LLC has managed ORNL, we

399

Independent commentators repeatedly cited Solyndra as an innovative and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

commentators repeatedly cited Solyndra as an innovative and commentators repeatedly cited Solyndra as an innovative and promising company: San Jose Mercury News: "Fremont's Solyndra goes from stealth to solar star" October 6, 2008 Richard Branson, the billionaire entrepreneur and adventurer, thinks Solyndra has a good idea. Branson's Virgin Green Fund got pitches from 117 solar companies but invested in only one, Solyndra, said Anup Jacob, a partner in the fund's San Francisco office. "They have the potential to become the next great energy company," he said. San Francisco Chronicle: "A bright idea for solar power; Fremont startup's innovative format saves time and space" October 7, 2008 University and government researchers have tinkered with solar cylinders before, said Daniel

400

Comments of Space Data Corporation | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Space Data Corporation Space Data Corporation Comments of Space Data Corporation Space Data is the leader in high altitude balloon borne communications platforms where between 65-100,000 feet we have flown over 20,000 commercial SkySite® flights totaling over 250,000 flight hours as well as supply the military with our StarFighter® platform which extends 2 way radio communications from under 10 miles to over 400 miles. We were founded in 1999 and to develop our technology we decided that the ReFlex paging protocol was appropriate and that FCC licensed spectrum was available. Hence we participated in FCC Auctions 40, 41 and 50 and through secondary market transactions accumulated almost 2 of the 3 MHz allocated to Narrowband PCS (NPCS) in the 901/930/940 MHz bands. Comments of Space Data Corporation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These comments are submitted on behalf of the National Association of State These comments are submitted on behalf of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) in response to the request for information (RFI) of the Department of Energy (DOE) entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26206 (May 11, 2010).1 NASUCA is a voluntary organization comprised of offices from 40 states and the District of Columbia, charged by their respective state laws to represent utility consumers before federal and state utility regulatory commissions, before other federal and state agencies, and before federal and state courts. Many NASUCA members have extensive experience with regulatory policies governing the utility

402

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") hereby submits the following comments in response to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26203 (May 11, 2010). The RFI requests comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding current and potential practices and policies for the states and other entities to empower consumers, and perhaps others, through access to detailed energy information in electronic form-including real-time information from smart meters, historical consumption data, and pricing and billing information.

403

COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S RAPID RESPONSE TEAM FOR TRANSMISSION'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Submitted by electronic mail to: Lamont.Jackson@hq.doe.gov The Large-scale Solar Association appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Rapid Response Team for Transmission's (RRTT) Request for Information. 1 We applaud the DOE for creating the RRTT and continuing to advance the efforts already made under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) entered into by nine Federal agencies in 2009 to expedite electric transmission construction. We also applaud the federal and state agencies that have expanded the Renewable Energy Policy Group and the Renewable Energy Action Team in California to focus on transmission, and hope that the tremendous

404

Microsoft Word - DOE Comments-Nov1rev.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Before the Before the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY WASHINGTON, DC Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy ) and Logistical Challenges ) to Smart Grid Implementation ) COMMENTS OF THE CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY AND THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION: IMPLEMENTING THE FIPS IN THE SMART GRID I. Introduction The Center for Democracy & Technology ("CDT") 1 and the Electronic Frontier Foundation ("EFF") 2 are pleased to file these comments in response to the September 17, 2010 Request for Information ("RFI") on "policy and logistical challenges that confront smart grid implementation, as well as recommendations on how to best overcome those challenges." 3 The RFI focuses in part on the effects on consumers of the implementation of the smart

405

DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental Impact  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Uranium Program Environmental Uranium Program Environmental Impact Statement DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental Impact Statement April 18, 2013 - 1:08pm Addthis Contractor, Bob Darr, S.M. Stoller Corporation Public Affairs, (720) 377-9672, ULinfo@lm.doe.gov GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that the public comment period for the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS) has been extended to May 31, 2013. Under the Uranium Leasing Program, DOE's Office of Legacy Management manages 31 tracts of land in Mesa, Montrose, and San Miguel counties in Colorado - approximately 25,000 acres - that are leased to private entities for uranium and vanadium mining. No mining operations are active

406

Microsoft Word - REMA Comments EIA_Agency_Info_Collection.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 600 * Washington, DC 20036-2701 1 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 600 * Washington, DC 20036-2701 202-640-6597 tel * 202-223-5537 fax * www.renewablemarketers.org Submitted via: ERS2014@eia.gov May 6, 2013 Ms. Rebecca Peterson U.S. Energy Information Administration Mail Shop EI-23 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Comments of the Renewable Energy Markets Association on the Energy Information Administration's Agency Information Collection Extension Dear Ms. Peterson: The Renewable Energy Markets Association (REMA) is pleased to submit the following recommendations and comments in response to the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) call for improved industry data collection. REMA is a North American trade association dedicated to maintaining and growing strong

407

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Infrastructure Program Transmission Infrastructure Program Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228-8213 Via email: txprogram@wapa.gov April 3, 2009 Re: Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments regarding the implementation of section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 74 Fed. Reg. 9391-9393 (Mar. 4, 2009). Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of Horizon Wind Energy LLC ("Horizon"), I am pleased to submit comments on Western Area Power Administration ('Western')'s proposed implementation of section 402 of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009. Horizon develops, constructs, owns and operates wind farms throughout North America. Based

408

DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Definition of Showerhead Definition of Showerhead DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead May 19, 2010 - 12:59pm Addthis Today the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register an interpretive rule that sets out the Department's views on the definition of "showerhead" in 10 CFR 430.2. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here. The draft interpretive rule clarifies that a showerhead is any plumbing fitting that is designed to direct water onto a bather regardless of the shape, size, placement, or number of sprays or openings that it may have. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Withdraws Interpretive Rule and Provides Enforcement Guidance on

409

Microsoft Word - DOE Comment Letter.FINAL.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

/ 6 / 6 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 312 Washington, DC 20001-2075 Telephone: 202-662-9535 TDD: 202-662-9538 Fax: 202-662-9634 January 8, 2006 Anthony J. Como SEA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Comments on Department of Energy's Special Environmental Analysis Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA Dear Mr. Como: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy's November 2006 Special Environmental Analysis

410

20120131 DOE Congestion Study Clean Line Comments 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY 2012 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CONGESTION STUDY COMMENTS OF CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS LLC January 31, 2012 Clean Line Energy Partners LLC ("Clean Line") respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Plan for Conduct of 2012 Electric Transmission Congestion Study ("Congestion Study") as published in the Federal Register on November 11, 2011. Clean Line appreciates the DOE's renewed efforts to gather and review existing and new transmission data across the nation (as per 76 FR 70122) to develop a list of congestion areas that may be eligible for backstop authority under 216a of the Federal Power

411

Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities On behalf of Allegheny Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Monongahela Power Company, The Potomac Edison Company and West Penn Power Company, all doing business as Allegheny Power; Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company; and PATH Allegheny Transmission Company, LLC (collectively, the "Allegheny Energy Companies"), the following comments are submitted in accordance with the September 19, 2008 Department of Energy ("DOE") announcement of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities and opportunity for

412

EPRI Comments on the BioInitiative 2012 Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

BioInitiative 2012 has been issued as a follow-up to the BioInitiative Working Groups (BWG) 2007 report (updated in 2010).An EPRI Comments document (EPRI 1016233) following the 2007 BWG report indicated that (1) its content referenced only selective portions of the scientific literature on health effects associated with electromagnetic fields, rather than focusing on the full weight of evidence; and (2) the BWG reports conclusions were inconsistent with those of many expert ...

2013-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

413

Comment on 'Perfect drain for the Maxwell fish eye lens'  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The non-magnetic loss material has been proposed (2011 New J. Phys. 13 023038) to mimic a passive perfect drain in the Maxwell's fish eye lens (MFL). In this comment, we argue that this passive medium can only be treated as a perfect absorber which can totally absorb all incident radiation without scattering by it, but it cannot mimic a delta function at the image point. As a result, this passive medium cannot help to achieve a perfect focusing in MFL.

Sun, Fei

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, May 25, 2010 DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, May 25, 2010 DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request. The DOE shares your commitment to providing taxpayers and the public with timely reporting on the progress of Recovery Act projects. DOE Response to comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, May 25, 2010 More Documents & Publications Comments regarding U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Agency Information Collection Request, Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 100, Tuesday, May 25,

415

RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. RedSeal's core technology is the ability to understand the access control of the network as a whole - not simply the behavior of a single device. RedSeal analyzes the interactions of firewalls, routers and load balancers network wide to determine the traffic allowed between every two points. RedSeal Comments on "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges. More Documents & Publications Southern Company: DOE Smart Grid RFI Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI

416

EIS-0369: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting EIS-0369: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridor and Rail Alignment The Department of Energy is now announcing an additional public meeting in Reno, Nevada and the public comment period also is being extended through December 12, 2006 for the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridot and Rail Alignment Environmental Impact Statement. Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting for the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Rail Corridot and Rail Alignment Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0369) (November 2006 - 71 FR 65785) More Documents & Publications EIS-0250: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public

417

Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Section 214 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's ("Commission") Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.214, and the Notice of Filing issued in this proceeding on August 25, 2005, the City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") moves to intervene and provides the following comments in this proceeding. Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia More Documents & Publications Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan

418

EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico In response to requests for additional time to review and comment on the document, NNSA is extending the public comment period until September 20, 2006. DOE/EIS-0380, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 76 FR 40352 (August 2006) More Documents & Publications EIS-0380: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental

419

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 More Documents & Publications FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS

420

Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Environmental Justice Interagency Working Group Community Dialogue Anchorage, AK February 7-11, 2011 The EJ IWG conducted 18 community dialogues across the country from February 2011 to November 2011. Comments and concerns of the community were recorded at each meeting. The IWG's commitment was that its agency partners would provide responses to communities about the concerns that were raised during these meetings. Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Comments on Hanford 2012 Accelerating Clean Up and Shrinking the Site  

SciTech Connect

In the late summer of 2000, the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL) Manager, Keith Klein, announced his approach to cleanup of the Hanford Site in a document called ''Done in a Decade.'' He asked for comments and suggestions to improve the plan from employees and stakeholders. We received over 300 individual comments. Several of the comments and the Hanford Advisory Board objected to the title of the plan, leading us to change it to ''Hanford 2012 Accelerating Cleanup and Shrinking the Site.'' We addressed virtually all substantive comments, i.e. those that recommended a change in the text, better understanding of an Issue, or consideration of a new Mea, and incorporated editorial comments where appropriate. We thank all those who took time to comment. The new plan, ''Hanford 2012'', is a much better document because you did so. You will notice some things about the table: Comments are not quoted verbatim--most were paraphrased to conserve space; Comments were separated into one of four sections: general, the River, the Plateau, the Future; Commenters are not identified by name or organization; Comments are generally listed in the order in which they were received, several comments were repetitive, but differed slightly so we made an effort to respond to each one, despite apparent repetition; There are many acronyms used at the Hanford Site, most of which can be found on the Web at http:/Ewww.hanford.gov/acronyml. We have attempted to spell out each acronym the first time it's used in a comment/response with the following exceptions: DOE--Department of Energy; RL--Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office; and ORP--Department of Energy, Office of River Protection.

SHERMAN, Y.T.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

2 Resource Conservation District Sonya Webb 3 Diamond W Cattle Company Mike Williams Response to Comments: No. Author Comment Response  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on the Ventura River Algae TMDL to develop a TMDL that will result in a mechanism for reducing nutrient discharges and also maintain the ability of the stakeholders in the watershed to coordinate and effectively implement the TMDLs. We feel that the TMDL that was adopted by the Los Comment noted. 1.2 Gerhardt Hubner Angeles Regional Water Board achieves that goal. We would like to express our support for the Ventura River Algae TMDL and request that the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) approve the TMDL as proposed. As this is a consent decree TMDL with a deadline of March 24, 2013, we appreciate the SWRCBs rapid consideration of this TMDL. We feel it is important to get this TMDL effective as soon as possible to avoid conflicts with EPA promulgated TMDLs to address the same listings that will become effective in March 2013. Comment noted.

unknown authors

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Comment on "Quantum Time Crystals": a new paradigm or just another proposal of perpetuum mobile?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A Comment on Frank Wilczek's paper "Quantum Time Crystals" (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012); arXiv:1202.2539).

Patrick Bruno

2012-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

424

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

usable. * Information Bridge * DOepatents * DOE R&D Project Summaries * Conference Papers & Proceedings * Energy Citations Database Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

425

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

findable, and usable. Information Bridge DOepatents DOE R&D Project Summaries Conference Papers & Proceedings Energy Citations Database Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

426

WIPP SEIS-II - Comment Response Supplement, Volume II (Part 1 of 24)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

II II Public Comments September 1997 Department of Energy Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico This Document Printed on Recycled Paper COMMENT RESPONSE SUPPLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TC-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME II PUBLIC COMMENTS Agency Comments...............................................................................................PC - 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Region 6 (A-001) .......................................PC - 3 State of New Mexico Environment Department (A-002)............................................PC - 4 State of Texas: Office of the Governor (A-003) .....................................................PC - 6 State of Ohio: Office of the Governor (A-004).......................................................PC - 6 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (A-005)

427

Comment template for draft FIPS 201 and SP 800-73 ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Cmt # Organization Point of Contact Comment Type (G ... a separate repository or in the agency directory)? ... planned for in the new ATF headquarters. ...

2007-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

428

How Best to Coordinate California Higher Education: Comments on the Governor's Proposed Reforms  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

a leadership role in higher education so that other statesTO COORDINATE CALIFORNIA HIGHER EDUCATION: COMMENTS ON THEDirector, Office of Higher Education Policy and Planning

Fox, Warren H.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts : Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 4, Comments and Responses.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This volume of the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) contains public comments addressing the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Draft EIS, August 1990 and Bonneville Power Administration`s (BPA) responses. The Introduction provides information about the process BPA follows in addressing these comments. Part I contains a listing of the Alternative Actions evaluated in the Final EIS; Part II is organized by Alternatives and includes summaries of the comments and BPA responses; Part III provides copies of the original comments letters, and, for ease of identification, are coded in the margins according to the alternative(s) addressed.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

sciences, energy technologies, engineering, computer and information science, renewable energy Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340 Icon64x64 Reply (If you're...

432

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

"Deep" 2. Time money and delayed progress. Challenges of grey literature. Expand on: storagepreservation issues, accessibility, and exponential growth Add new comment Thumbnail...

433

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

hurt you (or, at least, it could help you). Challenges of grey literature. Expand on: storagepreservation issues, accessibility, and exponential growth Add new comment Thumbnail...

434

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Multimedia Research * Speech Search * Face identification * Object recognition * Video browsing * Semantic extraction * (3D) Segmentation * (3D) Image search Add new comment...

435

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

pages ScienceAccelerator Key DOE databases WorldWideScience.org 200 million pages 19 sources, 17 countries, all inhabited continents Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

436

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

text, deep web search Mention and discussion, much broader than citation "Real time" sources, less delay than citations Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

437

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

FY2006-icsti Slide10 Deep Web Current models include only a few international sources Only small parts of the deep Web are metasearchable Add new comment Thumbnail...

438

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

WorldWideScience.org searches the 'deep web' 80+ databases from trusted authoritative sources Generally not searchable by major search engines Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

439

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

businesses . . . Business: 14% Government: 15% Education: 6% International: 22% Internet Providers: 14% Unidentified: 29% Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

440

EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Comment on "Analysis of quantum coherent semiconductor quantum dot p-i-n junction photovoltaic cells"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This is a comment on PRL paper by A.P. Kirk "Analysis of quantum coherent semiconductor quantum dot p-i-n junction photovoltaic cells"

Scully, Marlan O

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

ENERGYSOLUTIONS' Comment in Response to Notice of Inquiry, Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945

443

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Citation Preliminary investigation of the potential of harnessing tidal energy for electricity generation in Malaysia Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340 Icon64x64...

444

Microsoft Word - DOE Smart Grid RFI_APGA Comments 110110.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

systems, public utility districts, county districts, and other public agencies that have natural gas distribution facilities. www.apga.org APGA fully supports the comments filed...

445

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Federated Search, Multilingual WorldWideScience.org Multimedia Search and Retrieval "SciencePix" pilot project Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

446

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technologies - * Multilingual Translations of 10 languages * Multimedia Search and Retrieval of Speech Indexed Content * Federated Search in a Mobile Environment Add new comment...

447

EIS-0299: Notice of Extension of Comment Period for the Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Comment Period for the Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Production of Plutonium-238 for Use in Advanced Radioisotope Power Systems for Future Space Missions DOE is...

448

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

of DOE's datasets. * 700+ datasets from the DOE Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility will be initially added. Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

449

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

through Knowledge Discovery Making hundreds of databases searchable with a single query. WorldWideScience.org - A global science gateway Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

450

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Slide13 Science Accelerator DOEOSTI STI products now searchable via a single query www.scienceaccelerator.gov Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

451

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled Energy Conservation Program: Energy...

452

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

where scientific databases reside. We need systems that probe the deep Web. Unlike the Google solution, federated search places no burden on the database owners. Add new comment...

453

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

dispel the misperception that traditional search engines can find whatever we seek * Google * Yahoo * bing msn LiveSearch Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile320x340...

454

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

at Individual WWS.org Databases * Scientific Electronic Library Online (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, Venezuela) Add new comment Original...

455

Public Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Security Act of 2007 Comments by the United States Enrichrnent Corporation (USEC) in response to DOE's Notice of Inquiry (N0l) on the Convention on Supplementary...

456

Microsoft Word - BPA Comments on form EIA-930 _final_.docx  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

- BONNEVILLE'S COMMENTS ON FORM EIA-930 BEFORE THE ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection ) Proposed at Extension with Changes ) 78 Fed. Reg. 14521...

457

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

FY2007-etdeportugal Slide11 Search Results Switching subject areas, a search for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells retrieves almost 10,000 matches. Add new comment Original Thumbnail...

458

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR LEASE OF LAND AND FACILITIES AT THE EAST TENNESSEE TECENOLOGY PARK OAK RIDGE,TENNESSEE @OE/EA-1175) NOVEMBER 1997. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE [blank page] CONTENTS 1 1 . INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 2. SCOPE AND ORGANIZATIONS ................................................... 3 3. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES .i ................................................. 5 3.1 DOE NEPA Review Process/Categorical Exclusions .............................. 5 3.1.1 SummaryofComments ............................................... 5 3.1.2 Response/Revisions .................................................. 5

459

From the Mailbag: Questions and Comments on the New Energy.gov...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In sifting through the mailbox, we found the majority of comments were on five items: Search The "Recharge" Banner Employee's Section Localization Issues Love it So we thought...

460

WIPP SEIS-II - Comment Response Supplement, Volume I (Part 1...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

I Public Hearing Transcripts and Exhibits September 1997 Department of Energy Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico This Document Printed on Recycled Paper COMMENT RESPONSE...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Reply to Comment on 'Ginzburg-Landau theory of two-band superconductors: Absence of type-1.5 superconductivity'  

SciTech Connect

This comment defends the authors' prior paper against criticism concerning reduction of a Ginzburg-Landau theory.

Kogan, Vladimir G.; Schmalian, Joerg

2012-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

462

Response to Comment on "Sources and Variations of Mercury in Tuna"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Response to Comment on "Sources and Variations of Mercury in Tuna" Dr. Aucott's comment on our as evidence against a surface source for methylmercury or that mercury in tuna is not responding to mercury that the emissions of mercury from Asia reach well into the region around Hawaii where the tuna were caught (see

Morel, François M. M.

463

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide28 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 12:07 FY2008-stip speeches FY2008-stip Slide28 Web 2.0 at OSTI Web 2.0 Beginnings Wiki Blog Widgets Add new comment...

464

Dual axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility. Final environmental impact statement, Volume 2: Public comments and responses  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On May 12, 1995, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the draft Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility Environmental Impact Statement (DARHT EIS) for review by the State of New Mexico, Indian Tribes, local governments, other Federal agencies, and the general public. DOE invited comments on the accuracy and adequacy of the draft EIS and any other matters pertaining to their environmental reviews. The formal comment period ran for 45 days, to June 26, 1995, although DOE indicated that late comments would be considered to the extent possible. As part of the public comment process, DOE held two public hearings in Los Alamos and Santa Fe, New Mexico, on May 31 and June 1, 1995. In addition, DOE made the draft classified supplement to the DARHT EIS available for review by appropriately cleared individuals with a need to know the classified information. Reviewers of the classified material included the State of New Mexico, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Defense, and certain Indian Tribes. Volume 2 of the final DARHT EIS contains three chapters. Chapter 1 includes a collective summary of the comments received and DOE`s response. Chapter 2 contains the full text of the public comments on the draft DARHT EIS received by DOE. Chapter 3 contains DOE`s responses to the public comments and an indication as to how the comments were considered in the final EIS.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Microsoft Word - WAPA Trans. Comment Extension Request.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA VERMILLION, SOUTH DAKOTA 100 FIRST STREET SW, SUITE 201 CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52404 T: 319 362 2120 F: 866 484 2372 E: info@plainsjustice.org W: http://plainjustice.org Printed on recycled paper Transmission Infrastructure Program Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228- 8213 March 25, 2009 To Whom It May Concern: Intertribal Council on Utility Policy, Dakota Resource Council, Native Action, Plains Justice and Western Organization of Resource Councils write to request an extension to the thirty (30) day comment period and additional opportunities for public hearing on WAPA's Notice of proposed principles, policies and practices for a Transmission Infrastructure Program. Notice

466

Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information (RFI) regarding the "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges." The North American Electric Reliability Corporation's ("NERC") Reliability Assessment and Performance Analysis Group ("RAPA") is currently developing a report, entitled "Reliability Consideration from Integration of Smart Grid" that will address many of the issues raised in the DOE RFI. North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)

467

Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wireless Wireless Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless As the Department of Energy (DOE) correctly notes, Smart Grid technology holds significant promise in improving "the reliability, availability, and efficiency of the electric system." The benefits of developing and deploying Smart Grid technology include reduced energy costs, increased security, enhanced durability, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. But effective communications networks and services are critical to the success of Smart Grid technology. For Smart Grids to function properly, vast amounts of information must be transmitted and processed to and from consumers and electricity producers and distributors, with high levels of security as that data transmission and processing takes place.

468

Microsoft Word - ELCON Comments on Letterhead 05-02-13  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May 2, 2013 May 2, 2013 Ms. Rebecca Peterson U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Energy Information Administration Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via email to ERS2014@eia.gov Re: EIA Form Collection Extension with Changes, 78 Fed. Reg. 14521 (Mar. 6, 2013) Dear Ms. Peterson: The Electricity Consumers Resource Council ("ELCON") appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed information collection of the U.S. Energy Information Administration ("EIA") referenced above, and in particular on the "Annual Electric Generator Report," Form EIA-860, with proposed changes. ELCON is the national association representing large industrial consumers of electricity. ELCON

469

Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 15. 2011 April 15. 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Via Email: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Subject: Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 Dear Mr. Cohen: The American Gas Association (AGA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject Department of Energy ("the Department") Request for Information (RFI) seeking comment and information to assist it in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether such regulations should be modified or repealed pursuant to Executive Order 13563 ("Improving

470

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

471

EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension for Time for Comments Extension for Time for Comments EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology In response to a public request, the Department of Energy (DOE) announces an extension of time to submit comments on the preferred technology announced August 3, 2005 in the Federal Register Notice of Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology (70 FR 44598) to September 21, 2005. DOE/EIS-0287, Extension for Time for Comments, Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Notice of Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology, 70 FR 49264 (August 2005) More Documents & Publications EIS-0287: Notice of Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2005

472

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

473

EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

74: Notice of Extension of Comment Period 74: Notice of Extension of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the previously published May 13, 2005 to January 5, 2006. Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing its Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration EIS under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). BPA is currently considering a proposed interconnection requested by PPM Energy, Inc. (PPM), to integrate electrical power from their proposed Klondike III Wind Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Bonneville Power Administration Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project Notice of Comment Period, DOE/EIS-0374 (December 2005 - 70 FR

474

Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Electrolux to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Letter from Electrolux to Department of Energy General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers Electrolux sumitted comments on re-testing, re-certification, and re-rating of large-capacity residential clothes washers tested with alternative procedures under a waiver situation. Elextrolux requested a waiver and interim waivers for large-capacity. Electrrolux addressed the General Counsel's specific question on retesting and stated that so long as the manufacturer documents that it has tested the products in accordance with the actual basket volume

475

EIS-0250: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting EIS-0250: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, NV Based on input from the public, DOE is now announcing an additional public meeting in Reno, Nevada. The public comment period also is being extended through December 12, 2006. Notice of Public Comment Period Extension and Additional Public Meeting on the Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada, DOE/EIS-0250 (71 FR 65786) (November 2006) More Documents & Publications

476

Comments received on the plan presented at the March 29, 2006 conference  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Comments to the U.S. Department of Energy on the Plan Presented at the March 29, 2006, Public Technical Conference on the Transmission Congestion Study Plan and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETCs) The following material comprises comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy in response to a request at the March 29, 2006, Public Technical Conference on the Transmission Congestion Study Plan and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETCs) held at the Hilton Garden Inn O'Hare Airport. These comments were received via e- mail to EPACT1221@hq.doe.gov. It was requested that all comments be submitted by close-of- business Friday, April 14, 2006. The U.S. Department of Energy presents the comments as received and without any endorsement

477

EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing Draft Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOE has extended the comment period for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemential EIS through October 10 and announces an additional Public Hearing in Espanola, NM. EIS-0283-S2-CommentExtension-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0312: Notice of Availability of the Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision UDAC Meeting - January 2012 Electricity Advisory Committee Notice of Open Meeting October 2 and 3, 2013: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 176 - September 11, 2013

478

EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Extension of Comment Period Notice of Extension of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the previously published May 13, 2005 to January 5, 2006. Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing its Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration EIS under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). BPA is currently considering a proposed interconnection requested by PPM Energy, Inc. (PPM), to integrate electrical power from their proposed Klondike III Wind Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Bonneville Power Administration Klondike III/Biglow Canyon Wind Integration Project Notice of Comment Period, DOE/EIS-0374 (December 2005 - 70 FR

479

DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act August 18, 2010 - 4:33pm Addthis Today, in response to a formal request, General Counsel Scott Blake Harris approved a 30-day extension of the public comment period on DOE's Notice of Inquiry (75 FR 43945) soliciting comment on the development of regulations to carry out section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which implements the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage. The public comment period will be extended to October 27, 2010. The signed extension which is provided here, will be published shortly in the Federal Register. Addthis Related Articles DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy

480

Comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway White Papers | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway White Papers Comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway White Papers Home > Groups > Water Power Forum Feedback Welcome: The Water Power Program welcomes comments on MHK Cost Reduction Pathway white paper products from the MHK community. Comments will be used for the Program's internal purposes and DOE is not obligated to provide a response to comments. Please provide your feedback regarding the content of the white papers via this Forum. Cost Reduction Pathways White Papers: The U.S. Department of Energy's Water Power Program is seeking to demonstrate the technical and economic opportunity of marine and hydrokinetic (MHK) technologies. As part of this process, Sandia National Laboratories, in partnership with the Water Power Program, developed four white papers to identify and address critical cost drivers, and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "tecn chg comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04 Potomac River Generating Station Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04 Potomac River Generating Station Docket No. EO-05-01: On behalf of Mirant Potomac River LLC ("Mirant"), we respectfully request the opportunity to respond to certain written comments received by the Department of Energy in connection with the Department's Special Environmental Analysis dated November 2006 (DOE/SEA-04, the "SEA")) regarding DOE Order 202-05-03 ("DOE Order"), as extended by DOE Order 202-06-2 and DOE Order 202-06-2A, concerning the operations of the Potomac River Generating Station (the "Plant"). Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE/SEA-04

482

Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments from Southern California Edison on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy More Documents & Publications Re: U.S. Department of Energy Request for Information Implementing the

483

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply comments by the ad hoc Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group (the "Group") in response to various comments submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy on its Federal Register "Notice of Inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act" of December 31, 1997. 62 Fed.Reg. 68272. The Group is comprised of comprised of Bechtel National, Inc., BNFL, Inc., BWX Technologies, Inc., Duke Engineering & Services, Inc., Fluor Corporation, Johnson Controls World Services Corporation, Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, Nuclear Fuel Services,

484

Public invited to comment on additional proposed modications to WIPP hazardous waste permit  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications To WIPP Hazardous Waste Permit CARLSBAD, N.M., April 26, 2000 - The public is invited to comment on additional proposed modifications to the hazardous waste facility permit for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Earlier this month, DOE and the Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division requested -- through three Class 2 permit modification submittals -- that the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) change certain provisions of the state permit. On April 20, DOE and Westinghouse submitted to NMED three additional Class 2 permit modifications. The Class 2 submittals begin a formal review process that includes a 60-day public comment period and two separate public meetings. Written comments will be accepted by

485

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. On September 25, the public comment period was extended to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's G&T Cooperatives, sent September 25, 2013

486

Motion to Intervene and Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit Motion to Intervene and Comments of Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit A motion to intervene and comments from Public Utility District No. 1 (Pend Oreille County, Washington) on PP 99-1 Notice of Intent to Amend Presidential Permit, where DOE proposes to amend certain presidential permits including one held by the District and export authorizations to add a requirement that the permittees provide open access transmission services on their international transmission lines. Public Utility District No. 1 (Washington State) Comments on PP 99-1 Notice

487

Comments from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia Supporting the Comments from the City of Alexandria on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from Congressman James P. Moran, 8th District of Virginia Supporting the Comments from the City of Alexandria on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No. EO-05-01: I wish to add my voice to the comments submitted on behalf of the City of Alexandria by its legal counsel John B. Britton of Schnader Harrison Segal and Lewis LLP and City Attorney, Ignacio B. Pessoa, and offer my additional comments on the Tuesday, December 20th order governing future operations of the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (Docket No. EO-05-0 1). I would especially like to emphasize that all

488

Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Report to  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price Anderson Act Comment to Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") Concerning Preparation of a Report to Congress on the Price Anderson Act Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE's December 31, 1997 Federal Register "Notice of inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act." Comments focus on the following three ideas. First, we strongly support extension of the indemnification protections of the Act. Second, Battelle supports the continuing interest in contractor accountability for nuclear safety compliance, though we believe that contractors have always been, and remain, accountable through contractual provisions and we do not believe

489

Supplemental Comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") Supplemental Comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel is Ohio's statutory residential utility consumer advocate, empowered under Chapter 4911 of the Ohio Revised Code to represent the interests of Ohio residential utility consumers in proceedings before state and federal administrative agencies and courts. Supplemental Comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel ("OCC") More Documents & Publications Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation: Comments by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates

490

Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of Energy on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of Energy on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information (RFI)

491

Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments of AT&T Inc. Comments of AT&T Inc. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates ("AT&T"), respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department Of Energy"s Request for Information ("RFI") on the communications requirements of utilities. AT&T supports DOE"s efforts and coordination with various Federal, State and private initiatives to implement the Smart Grid. We appreciate the opportunity to inform federal Smart Grid policy by participating in DOE"s examination of the communications requirements of electric utilities deploying Smart Grid capabilities in their networks. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc.

492

Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. On January 5, 2009, ITC Transmission filed with the Department of Energy a request to amend Presidential Permit PP-230-3, which authorizes ITC to own and operate specified electric transmission facilities at the Bunce Creek station that interconnect ITC with Hydro One Networks Inc electric transmission facilities at the Michigan-Ontario border. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. More Documents & Publications Application for presidential permit OE Docket No. PP-230-4 International Transmission Company: Response of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. to Answer of

493

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates ("AT&T"), respectfully submits these reply comments in response to the Department Of Energy"s Request for Information ("RFI") on the communications requirements of electric utilities in Smart Grid deployments.1 In its initial comments, AT&T highlighted the expanding demand for network connectivity and how utilities can benefit from leveraging new network technologies deployed by commercial communications operators to optimize the performance, scalability, security, reliability and cost effectiveness of their Smart Grid applications deployments. Commercial communications

494

Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid The undersigned members of the natural gas industry are pleased to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's Request for Information Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (Sep. 17, 2010). The Request seeks comment on challenges that confront smart grid implementation and recommendations on how best to overcome those challenges. We believe abundant, domestic, low-carbon natural gas resources along with

495

Comments to the Feb 06 FRN received after March 9, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Comments to the DOE Federal Register Notice of Inquiry (NOI) on Considerations for Transmission Congestion Study and Designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Final Addendum - Additional Comments Received after March 9, 2006 The following material comprises the addendum to the comments received by DOE in response to the Federal Register Notice of Inquiry [FR Doc. E6-1394] issued on February 2, 2006. This notice solicited comment and information from the public concerning its plans for an electric transmission congestion study and possible designation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (''NIETCs'') in a report based on the study pursuant to section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Through this Notice of Inquiry, DOE invited comment on

496

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Honeywell comment on regulatory policy issues that need to be considered, and on implementation challenges and opportunities critical to deploying Smart Grid systems. Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Honeywell Responses To Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of Energy on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities To Inform Federal Smart

497

EIS-0396: Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments EIS-0396: Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments Global Nuclear Energy Partnership In response to public requests, the Department of Energy (DOE) announces an extension of time to submit comments on the proposed scope, alternatives, and environmental issues to be analyzed in the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP PEIS). Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments on the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, DOE/EIS-0396 (April 2007) 72 FR 15871 More Documents & Publications EIS-0359: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement Analysis EIS-0360: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement Analysis

498

Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules February 17, 2011 - 5:29pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announced that, in response to requests from a number of parties, it has re-opened the public comment period on its proposed revisions to the Department's NEPA rules. The public comment period will be extended three weeks and will now close on March 7, 2011. DOE, on January 3, 2011, issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to amend its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The proposals focus primarily on the Department's categorical exclusion provisions, and reflect the first update to these provisions in

499

Joint comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company on notice of proposed amendment. FE Docket No. 99-1 Joint comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company on notice of proposed amendment. FE Docket No. 99-1 Pursuant to the department of energy's notice of proposed amendment to presidential permits and export authorizations and delegation and assignment to the federal energy regulatory commission, announced in the federal register on July 27, 1999, Consumers Energy Company and The Detriot Edison Company hereby submit the following comments. Joint comments of consumers energy company and the detriot edison company on notice of proposed amendment. FE Docket No. 99-1 More Documents & Publications Motion to intervene of Consumers Energy Company. FE Docket No. 99-1

500

Summary of comments received from workshops on radiological criteria for decommissioning  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducting an enhanced participatory rulemaking to establish radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning of NRC-licensed facilities. Open public meetings were held during 1993 in Chicago, IL, San Francisco, CA, Boston, MA, Dallas, TX, Philadelphia, PA, Atlanta, GA, and Washington, DC. Interested parties were invited to provide input on the rulemaking issues before the NRC staff develops a draft proposed rule. This report summarizes 3,635 comments categorized from transcripts of the seven workshops and 1,677 comments from 100 NRC docketed letters from individuals and organizations. No analysis or response to the comments is included. The comments reflect a broad spectrum of viewpoints on the issues related to radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning. The NRC also held public meetings on the scope of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) during July 1993. The GEIS meetings were held in Washington, DC., San Francisco, CA, Oklahoma City, OK, and Cleveland, OH. Related comments from these meetings were reviewed and comments which differed substantially from those from the workshops are also summarized in the body of the report. A summary of the comments from the GEIS scoping meetings is included as an Appendix.

Caplin, J.; Page, G.; Smith, D.; Wiblin, C. [Advanced Systems Technology, Inc., Atlanta, GA (United States)

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z