Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification"  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification" Date: November 6, 2000 for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy Reviewed: Technical Evaluation Report Approved: "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Center for Astrophysics & Space Astronomy Revision A Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT

Colorado at Boulder, University of

2

eGSE America: Electric Aircraft Cargo Conveyor Technical Specification  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EACC Technical Specifications EACC Technical Specifications eGSE America: Electric Aircraft Cargo Conveyor (EACC) Technical Specifications Revision 00 August 2005 Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications eGSE America: EACC Technical Specifications 1.0 SCOPE: This document outlines the design and performance requirements for a battery- powered, self propelled belt conveyor for handling baggage and cargo at aircraft bulk cargo holds. The use of "shall" in this document indicates a mandatory requirement. The use of "should" indicates a recommendation or that which is advised but not required. 2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS: Portions of the following documents to the extent specified herein are a part of this Recommended Practice.

3

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS STUDY RESULTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to review technical specifications for emergency diesel generators in the context of new information developed in the Nuclear Plant Aging Research Program and the application of current NRC regulatory concepts and knowledge. Aging and reliability relationships related to the standard technical specifications are reviewed and supported by data and published information to ensure that conservative and beneficial specifications are identified. Where technical specifications could adversely influence aging and reliability, the technical issues and reasonable alternatives are identified for consideration. This report documents and spans the technical progress from the published and approved regulatory documents to the current knowledge basis. This ensures that the technical bases for the technical specifications discussed are documented and relatively complete subject information is contained in one document. The Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) has participated in the Nuclear Plant Aging Research (NPAR) Program directed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Division of Engineering. The NPAR study of emergency diesel generator aging was performed in two phases. In Phase I, plant operating experience, ~ata, expert opinion and statistical methods were used to produce a new data base related to aging, reliability, and operational readiness of nuclear service diesel generators. Phase II was chiefly concerned with aging mitigation measures.

Hoopingarner, K. R.

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

Technical requirements specification for tank waste retrieval  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides the technical requirements specification for the retrieval of waste from the underground storage tanks at the Hanford Site. All activities covered by this scope are conducted in support of the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) mission.

Lamberd, D.L.

1996-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

6

Technical support document: Survey data used in revising the energy conservation requirements in the manufactured home construction and safety standards  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents data used in the development of revised energy conservation standards for manufactured housing. The approach used in developing the proposed standard revision is a cost-benefit analysis in which the costs of energy conservation measures (ECM) are balanced against the benefits of energy savings. The analysis used to develop the recommendations for revision of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) energy conservation standards for manufactured housing requires information on specific ECMs. This technical support document contains the data from two of the three surveys that were used primarily to characterize the available ECMs and their associated costs. The analyses of these data are provided in separate reports. 5 refs.

Lee, A.D.; Conner, C.C.

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

Record of Technical Change - Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Record of Technical Change, Technical Change No. CAP-1, dated April 13, 2005 for Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0, September 2004, DOE/NV--1003.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Nevada Site Office; Bechtel Nevada

2005-04-13T23:59:59.000Z

8

Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages (Revised)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4687 4687 Revised August 2009 Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages D.R. Roberts and R. Anderson National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-550-44687 Revised August 2009 Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages D.R. Roberts and R. Anderson Prepared under Task No. BET88001 The addition of Appendix D is the only revision to the January 2009

9

Hop-by-hop Computing for Green Internet Routing (Technical report, under revision)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hop-by-hop Computing for Green Internet Routing (Technical report, under revision) Yuan Yang@cernet.edu.cn Abstract--Energy conservation is a global concern nowadays and it is widely expected that energy cost will continuously increase in the near future. The design of the Internet, un- fortunately, has not taken energy

Wang, Dan

10

Technical specifications for mechanical recycling of agricultural plastic waste  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Highlights: • Technical specifications for agricultural plastic wastes (APWs) recycling proposed. • Specifications are the base for best economical and environmental APW valorisation. • Analysis of APW reveals inherent characteristics and constraints of APW streams. • Thorough survey on mechanical recycling processes and industry as it applies to APW. • Specifications for APW recycling tested, adjusted and verified through pilot trials. - Abstract: Technical specifications appropriate for the recycling of agricultural plastic wastes (APWs), widely accepted by the recycling industry were developed. The specifications establish quality standards to be met by the agricultural plastics producers, users and the agricultural plastic waste management chain. They constitute the base for the best economical and environmental valorisation of the APW. The analysis of the APW streams conducted across Europe in the framework of the European project “LabelAgriWaste” revealed the inherent characteristics of the APW streams and the inherent constraints (technical or economical) of the APW. The APW stream properties related to its recycling potential and measured during pilot trials are presented and a subsequent universally accepted simplified and expanded list of APW recycling technical specifications is proposed and justified. The list includes two sets of specifications, applied to two different quality categories of recyclable APW: one for pellet production process (“Quality I”) and another one for plastic profile production process (“Quality II”). Parameters that are taken into consideration in the specifications include the APW physical characteristics, contamination, composition and degradation. The proposed specifications are focused on polyethylene based APW that represents the vast majority of the APW stream. However, the specifications can be adjusted to cover also APW of different materials (e.g. PP or PVC) that are found in very small quantities in protected cultivations in Europe. The adoption of the proposed specifications could transform this waste stream into a labelled commodity traded freely in the market and will constitute the base for the best economical and environmental valorisation of the APW.

Briassoulis, D., E-mail: briassou@aua.gr; Hiskakis, M.; Babou, E.

2013-06-15T23:59:59.000Z

11

HYDROGEN GENERATION FROM ELECTROLYSIS - REVISED FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE GO13028-0001 DESCRIPTION/ABSTRACT This report is a summary of the work performed by Teledyne Energy Systems to understand high pressure electrolysis mechanisms, investigate and address safety concerns related to high pressure electrolysis, develop methods to test components and systems of a high pressure electrolyzer, and produce design specifications for a low cost high pressure electrolysis system using lessons learned throughout the project. Included in this report are data on separator materials, electrode materials, structural cell design, and dissolved gas tests. Also included are the results of trade studies for active area, component design analysis, high pressure hydrogen/oxygen reactions, and control systems design. Several key pieces of a high pressure electrolysis system were investigated in this project and the results will be useful in further attempts at high pressure and/or low cost hydrogen generator projects. An important portion of the testing and research performed in this study are the safety issues that are present in a high pressure electrolyzer system and that they can not easily be simplified to a level where units can be manufactured at the cost goals specified, or operated by other than trained personnel in a well safeguarded environment. The two key objectives of the program were to develop a system to supply hydrogen at a rate of at least 10,000 scf/day at a pressure of 5000psi, and to meet cost goals of $600/ kW in production quantities of 10,000/year. On these two points TESI was not successful. The project was halted due to concerns over safety of high pressure gas electrolysis and the associated costs of a system which reduced the safety concerns.

IBRAHIM, SAMIR; STICHTER, MICHAEL

2008-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

12

Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister System Performance Specification: Revision 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document provides specifications for selected system components of the Transportation, Aging and Disposal (TAD) canister-based system.

13

Test specification for decant pump and winch assembly. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This specification provides the requirements for testing of the vertical turbine decant pump including the floating suction with load sensing winch control, instrumentation and the associated PLC/PC control system. All assembly necessary for testing including piping, temporary wiring, etc., shall be performed by the Seller. All referenced figures are at the back of this document. The testing consists of performance testing, winch testing and calibration, instrumentation verification testing and run-in testing of the pump. Testing shall be done in the presence and under the direction of the Buyer in accordance with this procedure.

Staehr, T.W.

1995-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

14

January 13, 2012, Technical Qualification Program, Revision 3 - Sandia Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OF DOCUMENT: OF DOCUMENT: SANDIA SITE OFFICE COORDINATION/APPROVAL SSO CP 0603.03, Technical Qualification Program DESCRIPTION (e.g., summary of changes): Incorporated: (I) changes to governing order (DOE 0 426.1); (2) SSO FR T&Q and CT procedures; (3) recommendations from recent self-assessments. Chan ed re- ualification eriodicity from 3 to 5 ears. REVISION NO.: 3 DATE: 1/11/12 Subject Matter Expert (SME) (name, org., & phone): Allen D. Tate, AMNO 845-4050 COORDINATING/APPROVING ORDER SIGNATURE DATE ORGANIZATION & NAME SME Allen D. Tate Environment, Safety & Health Dan Pellegrino, Assistant Manager Facilities & Projects Mike McFadden, Assistant Manager Nuclear Operations Jim Todd, Assistant Manager, FTCP Agent Safeguards & Security

15

Revised version of J Gen Physiol: 200709771 MOLECULAR DETERMINANT FOR SPECIFIC Ca/Ba  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Revised version of J Gen Physiol: 200709771 MOLECULAR DETERMINANT FOR SPECIFIC Ca/Ba SELECTIVITY PROFILES OF LOW AND HIGH THRESHOLD Ca2+ CHANNELS Thierry Cens, Matthieu Rousset, Andrey Kajava & Pierre-1559; E-mail: Pierre.charnet@crbm.cnrs.fr Running title: Divalent cation selection in LVA/HVA Ca2

Boyer, Edmond

16

Solid waste integrated forecast technical (SWIFT) report: FY1997 to FY 2070, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This web site provides an up-to-date report on the radioactive solid waste expected to be managed by Hanford's Waste Management (WM) Project from onsite and offsite generators. It includes: an overview of Hanford-wide solid waste to be managed by the WM Project; program-level and waste class-specific estimates; background information on waste sources; and comparisons with previous forecasts and with other national data sources. This web site does not include: liquid waste (current or future generation); waste to be managed by the Environmental Restoration (EM-40) contractor (i.e., waste that will be disposed of at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF)); or waste that has been received by the WM Project to date (i.e., inventory waste). The focus of this web site is on low-level mixed waste (LLMW), and transuranic waste (both non-mixed and mixed) (TRU(M)). Some details on low-level waste and hazardous waste are also provided. Currently, this web site is reporting data th at was requested on 10/14/96 and submitted on 10/25/96. The data represent a life cycle forecast covering all reported activities from FY97 through the end of each program's life cycle. Therefore, these data represent revisions from the previous FY97.0 Data Version, due primarily to revised estimates from PNNL. There is some useful information about the structure of this report in the SWIFT Report Web Site Overview.

Valero, O.J.; Templeton, K.J.; Morgan, J.

1997-01-07T23:59:59.000Z

17

UXO Engineering Design. Technical Specification and ConceptualDesign  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The design and fabrication of the UXO detector has numerous challenges and is an important component to the success of this study. This section describes the overall engineering approach, as well as some of the technical details that brought us to the present design. In general, an array of sensor coils is measuring the signal generated by the UXO object in response to a stimulation provided by the driver coil. The information related to the location, shape and properties of the object is derived from the analysis of the measured data. Each sensor coil is instrumented with a waveform digitizer operating at a nominal digitization rate of 100 kSamples per second. The sensor coils record both the large transient pulse of the driver coil and the UXO object response pulse. The latter is smaller in amplitude and must be extracted from the large transient signal. The resolution required is 16 bits over a dynamic range of at least 140 dB. The useful signal bandwidth of the application extends from DC to 40 kHz. The low distortion of each component is crucial in order to maintain an excellent linearity over the full dynamic range and to minimize the calibration procedure. The electronics must be made as compact as possible so that the response of its metallic parts has a minimum signature response. Also because of a field system portability requirement, the power consumption of the instrument must be kept as low as possible. The theory and results of numerical and experimental studies that led to the proof-of-principle multitransmitter-multireceiver Active ElectroMagnetic (AEM) system, that can not only accurately detect but also characterize and discriminate UXO targets, are summarized in LBNL report-53962: ''Detection and Classification of Buried Metallic Objects, UX-1225''.

Beche, J-F.; Doolittle, L.; Greer, J.; Lafever, R.; Radding, Z.; Ratti, A.; Yaver, H.; Zimmermann, S.

2005-04-23T23:59:59.000Z

18

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials' (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U[sub o]-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for group R'' residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub o}-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for ``group R`` residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

Technical support document for proposed 1994 revision of the MEC thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the Council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1994 supplement to the 1993 Model Energy Code (MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for maximum component U{sub 0}-value. The 1994 amendments to the 1993 MEC were established in last year`s code change cycle and did not change the envelope requirements. The research underlying the proposed MEC revision was conducted by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE) Building Energy Standards program. The goal of this research was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determines the most cost-effective (least total cost) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) (insulation levels and window types) for residential buildings. This least-cost set of ECMs was used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub 0}-values (thermal transmittances). ECMs include window types (for example, double-pane vinyl) and insulation levels (for example, R-19) for ceilings, walls, and floors.

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

May 15, 2012, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting Â… Presentation: Status of FAQS revision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 15, 2012 May 15, 2012 Jeanette Yarrington Process * Approve FAQS at 5-Year Intervals Identify Sponsor/POC and Revise FAQS FTCP Agents/DNFSB Staff Review Receive/Resolve Comments RevCom Process as Technical Standard Submit for DNFSB Staff Review FTCP Approval/CTA Concurrence Submit to TSP for Formal Posting FTCP Approval/CTA Concurrence Qualification Standard Sponsor/POC FTCP Agent Status Chemical Processing EM/Mike Mikolanis and Patricia Suggs Mike Mikolanis Complete - Approved 02/2010 Criticality Safety Idaho/Adolf Dary Newbry Complete - Approved 04/2009 Garcia and NA- SH/Jerry Hicks Environmental Compliance NA-173/Steve Black Mike Garcia Complete - Approved 06/2011 Facility Representative HSS/Earl Hughes Pat Worthington Complete - Approved 10/2010 *JTA needed Mechanical Systems Pantex/Terry

22

LED bulbs technical specification and testing procedure for solar home systems  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The definition of technical specifications and the corresponding laboratory procedures are necessary steps in order to assure the quality of the devices prior to be installed in Solar Home Systems (SHS). To clarify and unify criteria a European project supported the development of the Universal Technical Standard for Solar Home Systems (UTSfSHS). Its principles were to generate simple and affordable technical requirements to be optimized in order to facilitate the implementation of tests with basic and simple laboratory tools even on the same SHS electrification program countries. These requirements cover the main aspects of this type of installations and its lighting chapter was developed based on the most used technology at that time: fluorescent tubes and CFLs. However, with the consolidation of the new LED solid state lighting devices, particular attention is being given to this matter and new procedures are required. In this work we develop a complete set of technical specifications and test procedures that have been designed within the frame of the UTSfSHS, based on an intense review of the scientific and technical publications related to LED lighting and their practical application. They apply to lamp reliability, performance and safety under normal, extreme and abnormal operating conditions as a simple but complete quality meter tool for any LED bulb. These tests have been applied to a group of 14 low-cost direct current LED bulbs and the accomplishment of the proposed requirements is analyzed.

Alfonso Gago Calderón; Luis Narvarte Fernández; Luis Miguel Carrasco Moreno; Javier Serón Barba

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

Technical specification for the Product Evaluation Management Information System (PREMIS) Version 1. 1. 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the technical specifications and implementation details for the Product Evaluation Management Information System (PREMIS) Version 1.1.2. This document does not include the requirements analysis or design information and is not intended as a user's guide. The INGRES Applications-by-Forms (ABF) software development tool was used to specify and define the modules and screens which comprise the PREMIS application. Several external procedures are called by the ABF procedures; these have been written in VAX/VMS DCL (Digital Command Language) and SQL (Standard Query Language). These specifications together with the PREMIS information model and corresponding database definition constitute the PREMIS Version 1.1.2 technical specification and implementation description presented herein.

Eaton, D.S.; Hall, R.C.; Orman, J.L.; Klamerus, J.

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

FFCAct Clearinghouse, directory of abstracts: Radioactive waste technical support program. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCAct) Clearinghouse is a card catalog of information about the FFCAct and its requirements for developing Site Treatment Plans (STP). The information available in the clearinghouse includes abstracts describing computer applications, technical reports, and a list of technical experts. This report contains 61 abstracts from the database relating to radioactive waste management. The clearinghouse includes information on characterization, retrieval, treatment, storage, and disposal elements of waste management as they relate to the FFCAct and the treatment of mixed wastes. Subject areas of information being compiled include: commercial treatment capabilities; listings of technical experts for assistance in selecting and evaluating treatment options and technologies; mixed waste data and treatability groups; guidance on STP development; life-cycle costs planning estimates for facilities; references to documentation on available technologies and technology development activities; Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) for treatment facilities; regulatory, health and safety issues associated with treatment facilities and technologies; and computer databases, applications, and models for identifying and evaluating treatment facilities and technologies. Access to the FFCAct clearinghouse is available to the DOE and its DOE contractors involved in STP development and other FFCAct activities.

NONE

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

Revised Master Plan for the Hood River Production Program, Technical Report 2008.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hood River Production Program (HRPP) is a Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) funded program initiated as a mitigation measure for Columbia River hydrosystem effects on anadromous fish. The HRPP began in the early 1990s with the release of spring Chinook and winter steelhead smolts into the basin. Prior to implementation, co-managers, including the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife drafted the Hood River Production Master Plan (O'Toole and ODFW 1991a; O'Toole and ODFW 1991b) and the Pelton Ladder Master Plan (Smith and CTWSR 1991). Both documents were completed in 1991 and subsequently approved by the Council in 1992 and authorized through a BPA-led Environmental Impact Statement in 1996. In 2003, a 10-year programmatic review was conducted for BPA-funded programs in the Hood River (Underwood et al. 2003). The primary objective of the HRPP Review (Review) was to determine if program goals were being met, and if modifications to program activities would be necessary in order to meet or revise program goals. In 2003, an agreement was signed between PacifiCorp and resource managers to remove the Powerdale Dam (RM 10) and associated adult trapping facility by 2010. The HRPP program has been dependant on the adult trap to collect broodstock for the hatchery programs; therefore, upon the dam's removal, some sort of replacement for the trap would be needed to continue the HRPP. At the same time the Hood River Subbasin Plan (Coccoli 2004) was being written and prompted the co-managers to considered future direction of the program. This included revising the numerical adult fish objectives based on the assimilated data and output from several models run on the Hood River system. In response to the Review as well as the Subbasin Plan, and intensive monitoring and evaluation of the current program, the HRPP co-managers determined the spring Chinook program was not achieving the HRPP's defined smolt-to-adult (SAR) survival rate guidelines. The observed low SAR was due to precocity, straying, and incidence of BKD in the spring Chinook program; which ultimately led to the program's inability to achieve the subbasin's overly optimistic biological fish objectives. The summer steelhead hatchery program was not providing the fishery or population benefits anticipated and will be discontinued. The winter steelhead program was performing as planned and no changes are foreseen. This updated Master Plan addresses the several proposed changes to the existing HRPP, which are described.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation

2008-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

26

Technical Review Report for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Model 9977 S-SARP-G-00001 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Review Report (TRR) summarizes the review findings for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Model 9977 B(M)F-96 shipping container. The content analyzed for this submittal is Content Envelope C.1, Heat Sources, in assemblies of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators or food-pack cans. The SARP under review, i.e., S-SARP-G-00001, Revision 2 (August 2007), was originally referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package. The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's, Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9977 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. The Model 9977 Package design includes a single, 6-inch diameter, stainless steel pressure vessel containment system (i.e., the 6CV) that was designed and fabricated in accordance with Section III, Subsection NB, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. The earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, 9966, 9967 and 9968 Packages, were originally designed and certified in the 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with new safety requirements, based on International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, were proposed. The updated package designs were the Model 9972, 9973, 9974 and 9975 Packages, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. Differences between the Model 9975 Package and the Model 9977 Package include: (1) The lead shield present in the Model 9975 Package is absent in the Model 9977 Package; (2) The Model 9975 Package has eight allowable contents, while the Model 9977 Package has a single allowable content. (3) The 6CV of the Model 9977 Package is similar in design to the outer Containment Vessel of the Model 9975 Package that also incorporates a 5-inch Containment Vessel as the inner Containment Vessel. (4) The Model 9975 Package uses a Celotex{reg_sign}-based impact limiter while the Model 9977 Package uses Last-A-Foam{reg_sign}, a polyurethane foam, for the impact limiter. (5) The Model 9975 Package has two Containment Vessels, while the Model 9977 Package has a single Containment Vessel.

DiSabatino, A; Hafner, R; West, M

2007-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

27

Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review past procedures used to write, revise, or maintain a Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard.

28

A Specification for a Godunov-type Eulerian 2-D Hydrocode, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this code specification is to describe an algorithm for solving the Euler equations of hydrodynamics in a 2D rectangular region in sufficient detail to allow a software developer to produce an implementation on their target platform using their programming language of choice without requiring detailed knowledge and experience in the field of computational fluid dynamics. It should be possible for a software developer who is proficient in the programming language of choice and is knowledgable of the target hardware to produce an efficient implementation of this specification if they also possess a thorough working knowledge of parallel programming and have some experience in scientific programming using fields and meshes. On modern architectures, it will be important to focus on issues related to the exploitation of the fine grain parallelism and data locality present in this algorithm. This specification aims to make that task easier by presenting the essential details of the algorithm in a systematic and language neutral manner while also avoiding the inclusion of implementation details that would likely be specific to a particular type of programming paradigm or platform architecture.

Nystrom, William D [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Robey, Jonathan M [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

Test and evaluation document for DOT Specification 7A Type A Packaging. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has been conducting, through several of its operating contractors, an evaluation and testing program to qualify Type A radioactive material packagings per US Department of Transportation (DOT) Specification 7A (DOT-7A) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49, Part 178 (49 CFR 178). The program is currently administered by the DOE, Office of Facility Safety Analysis, DOE/EH-32, at DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) in Germantown, Maryland. This document summarizes the evaluation and testing performed for all of the packagings successfully qualified in this program.

NONE

1996-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

30

Technical Specifications of Micro-Hydropower System Design and Implementation : Feasibility Analysis and Design of Lamaya Khola Micro-Hydro Power Plant.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The purpose of this thesis is to first conduct a literature review regarding the technical specifications and design parametres required to design a working Micro… (more)

Kunwor, Anil

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

Reviewing PSA-based analyses to modify technical specifications at nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Changes to Technical Specifications (TSs) at nuclear power plants (NPPs) require review and approval by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). Currently, many requests for changes to TSs use analyses that are based on a plant`s probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). This report presents an approach to reviewing such PSA-based submittals for changes to TSs. We discuss the basic objectives of reviewing a PSA-based submittal to modify NPP TSs; the methodology of reviewing a TS submittal, and the differing roles of a PSA review, a PSA Computer Code review, and a review of a TS submittal. To illustrate this approach, we discuss our review of changes to allowed outage time (AOT) and surveillance test interval (STI) in the TS for the South Texas Project Nuclear Generating Station. Based on this experience gained, a check-list of items is given for future reviewers; it can be used to verify that the submittal contains sufficient information, and also that the review has addressed the relevant issues. Finally, recommended steps in the review process and the expected findings of each step are discussed.

Samanta, P.K.; Martinez-Guridi, G. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Vesely, W.E. [Science Applications International Corporation, Dublin, OH (United States)

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures The following procedures should be used to write, revise, or maintain a DOE...

33

Modifications in the Technical Specifications: Dual piston in series pump with servo-controlled variable stroke drive, floating pistons is with specs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Modifications in the Technical Specifications: Pump: Dual piston in series pump with servo-controlled variable stroke drive, floating pistons is with specs mentioned below are acceptable Set points 0.001 - 10

Bhalla, Upinder S.

34

Technical comments on EPA`s proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed new ambient air quality standards specifically for fine particulate matter, regulating concentrations of particles with median aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 {mu}m (PM{sub 2.5}). Two new standards have been proposed: a maximum 24-hr concentration that is intended to protect against acute health effects, and an annual concentration limit that is intended to protect against longer-term health effects. EPA has also proposed a slight relaxation of the 24-hr standard for inhalable particles (PM{sub 10}), by allowing additional exceedances each year. Fine particles are currently being indirectly controlled by means of regulations for PM{sub 10} and TSP, under the Clean Air Act of 1970 and subsequent amendments. Although routine monitoring of PM{sub 2.5} is rare and data are sparse, the available data indicate that ambient concentrations have been declining at about 6% per year under existing regulations.

Lipfert, F.W.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Technical Review Report for the Model 9978-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00002, Revision 1, March 2009)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE), on the 'Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), Model 9978 B(M)F-96', Revision 1, March 2009 (S-SARP-G-00002). The Model 9978 Package complies with 10 CFR 71, and with 'Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material-1996 Edition (As Amended, 2000)-Safety Requirements', International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9978 Packaging is designed, analyzed, fabricated, and tested in accordance with Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&PVC). The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the DOE's 'Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages'. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., 'Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material'. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9978 Packaging is a single containment package, using a 5-inch containment vessel (5CV). It uses a nominal 35-gallon drum package design. In comparison, the Model 9977 Packaging uses a 6-inch containment vessel (6CV). The Model 9977 and Model 9978 Packagings were developed concurrently, and they were referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package, Version 1 (GPFP). Both packagings use General Plastics FR-3716 polyurethane foam as insulation and as impact limiters. The 5CV is used as the Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) in the Model 9975-96 Packaging. The Model 9975-96 Packaging also has the 6CV as its Secondary Containment Vessel (SCV). In comparison, the Model 9975 Packagings use Celotex{trademark} for insulation and as impact limiters. To provide a historical perspective, it is noted that the Model 9975-96 Packaging is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then-newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The Model 9978 Package has six Content Envelopes: C.1 ({sup 238}Pu Heat Sources), C.2 ( Pu/U Metals), C.3 (Pu/U Oxides, Reserved), C.4 (U Metal or Alloy), C.5 (U Compounds), and C.6 (Samples and Sources). Per 10 CFR 71.59 (Code of Federal Regulations), the value of N is 50 for the Model 9978 Package leading to a Criticality Safety Index (CSI) of 1.0. The Transport Index (TI), based on dose rate, is calculated to be a maximum of 4.1.

West, M

2009-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

36

Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0 Page 1 FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY:__________________________ DATE:_________ REVISION NO.________ REVISION ISSUE DATE:____________ #12;Fermilab Engineering Manual ..................................... 166 #12;Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0 Page 3 A. REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Quigg, Chris

37

CT-guided Bipolar and Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation (RF Ablation) of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Specific Technical Aspects and Clinical Results  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Purpose. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of CT-guided bipolar and multipolar radiofrequency ablation (RF ablation) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to analyze specific technical aspects between both technologies. Methods. We included 22 consecutive patients (3 women; age 74.2 {+-} 8.6 years) after 28 CT-guided bipolar or multipolar RF ablations of 28 RCCs (diameter 2.5 {+-} 0.8 cm). Procedures were performed with a commercially available RF system (Celon AG Olympus, Berlin, Germany). Technical aspects of RF ablation procedures (ablation mode [bipolar or multipolar], number of applicators and ablation cycles, overall ablation time and deployed energy, and technical success rate) were analyzed. Clinical results (local recurrence-free survival and local tumor control rate, renal function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR)]) and complication rates were evaluated. Results. Bipolar RF ablation was performed in 12 procedures and multipolar RF ablation in 16 procedures (2 applicators in 14 procedures and 3 applicators in 2 procedures). One ablation cycle was performed in 15 procedures and two ablation cycles in 13 procedures. Overall ablation time and deployed energy were 35.0 {+-} 13.6 min and 43.7 {+-} 17.9 kJ. Technical success rate was 100 %. Major and minor complication rates were 4 and 14 %. At an imaging follow-up of 15.2 {+-} 8.8 months, local recurrence-free survival was 14.4 {+-} 8.8 months and local tumor control rate was 93 %. GFR did not deteriorate after RF ablation (50.8 {+-} 16.6 ml/min/1.73 m{sup 2} before RF ablation vs. 47.2 {+-} 11.9 ml/min/1.73 m{sup 2} after RF ablation; not significant). Conclusions. CT-guided bipolar and multipolar RF ablation of RCC has a high rate of clinical success and low complication rates. At short-term follow-up, clinical efficacy is high without deterioration of the renal function.

Sommer, C. M., E-mail: christof.sommer@med.uni-heidelberg.de [University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 110, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Germany); Lemm, G.; Hohenstein, E. [Minimally Invasive Therapies and Nuclear Medicine, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Clinic for Radiology (Germany); Bellemann, N.; Stampfl, U. [University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 110, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Germany); Goezen, A. S.; Rassweiler, J. [Clinic for Urology, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH (Germany); Kauczor, H. U.; Radeleff, B. A. [University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 110, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Germany); Pereira, P. L. [Minimally Invasive Therapies and Nuclear Medicine, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Clinic for Radiology (Germany)

2013-06-15T23:59:59.000Z

38

Space Conditioning Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Space Conditioning Standing Technical Space Conditioning Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan, v2011a Revised: January 2012 Committee Chair: 2011 Eric Martin Janet McIlvaine BA-PIRC Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan Overview Standing Technical Committees (STCs) focus on resolving key technical action items required to meet Building America performance goals. STC chairs lead each committees' activities in addressing specific research challenges, gaps in understanding, and new research opportunities. Committees include experts from the Building America research teams, DOE, national laboratories, and outside organizations that possess specialized knowledge or heightened interest in the topics being addressed. Committee chairs can create sub-committees on an as-needed basis to address targeted research needs.

39

Validation of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale, Second Edition (RCMAS-2) Scores for Children with Specific Learning Disabilities  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chapter I: Introduction 1 Statement of Purpose 6 Research Questions 6 Significance of the Study 7 Summary 8 Chapter II: Review of the Literature 10 Specific Learning Disabilities 10 Prevalence of Specific Learning Disabilities 14 School... Reference Subsample and the First Principal (General Anxiety) Coefficients 226 Table 10 Factor Pattern Coefficients for the Three-Factor Promax Solution for the RCMAS-2 Scores Among Students with Specific Learning Disabilities and the First Principal...

Raad, Jennifer Marie

2013-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

40

Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TECHNICAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES DOE-TSPP-9 Revision: 5 Date: August 1, 2000 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-9 Maintenance Revision: 5 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Technical basis for flawed cylinder test specification to assure adequate fracture resistance of ISO high strength steel cylinder  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

High pressure industrial gases (such as oxygen, nitrogen, argon, hydrogen, etc.) are stored and transported in portable cylinders. ISO TC58 SC3 has developed a draft specification 9809 for design and fabrication of high pressure cylinders with maximum tensile strength limitation of 1,100 N/mm{sup 2}. In order to extend the ISO 9809 rules for higher than 1,100 N/mm{sup 2} strength level cylinders, a working group WG14 was formed in 1989 to develop new rules to assure adequate fracture resistance. In 1994, WG14 recommended a simple, but unique flawed cylinder test method for design qualification of the cylinder and acceptance criteria to assure adequate fracture resistance. WG14 also recommended Charpy-V-Notch impact tests to control the required fracture resistance on production cylinders. This paper presents the technical basis that was employed in developing the flawed cylinder test method and acceptance criteria. The specification was developed for seamless steel cylinders having actual strength in the range of 1,100 to 1,400 N/mm{sup 2} and cylindrical section wall thickness in the range of 3mm to 10mm. Flawed cylinder tests were conducted on several hundred cylinders of varying sizes and strength levels. The specification requires to demonstrate LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK performance of the cylinder having flaw length equal to 1.6(O.D. {times} t{sub design}){sup 0.5} at failure pressure = (t{sub design}/t{sub actual}) {times} Design Pressure.

Rana, M.D. [Praxair, Inc., Tonawanda, NY (United States). Process and Systems R and D; Smith, J.H. [National Inst. of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (United States). Metallurgy Div.; Tribolet, R.O.

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

Technical basis for flawed cylinder test specification to assure adequate fracture resistance of ISO high-strength steel cylinder  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

High-pressure industrial gases (such as oxygen, nitrogen, argon, hydrogen, etc.) are stored and transported in portable cylinders. ISO TC58 SC3 has developed a draft specification 9809 for design and fabrication of high-pressure cylinders with maximum tensile strength limitation of 1,100 N/mm{sup 2}. In order to extend the ISO 9809 rules for higher than 1,100 N/mm{sup 2} strength level cylinders, a working group WG14 was formed in 1989 to develop new rules to assure adequate fracture resistance. In 1994, WG14 recommended a simple, but unique flawed cylinder test method for design qualification of the cylinder and acceptance criteria to assure adequate fracture resistance. WG14 also recommended Charpy-V-notch impact tests to control the required fracture resistance on production cylinders. This paper presents the technical basis that was employed in developing the flawed cylinder test method and acceptance criteria. The specification was developed for seamless steel cylinders having actual strength in the range of 1,100 to 1,400 N/mm{sup 2} and cylindrical section wall thickness in the range of 3 to 10 mm. Flawed cylinder tests were conducted on several hundred cylinders of varying sizes and strength levels. The specification requires to demonstrate LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK performance of the cylinder having flaw length equal to 1.6 (o.d. {times} t{sub design}){sup 0.5} at failure pressure = (t{sub design}/t{sub actual}) x Design Pressure.

Rana, M.D. [Praxair, Inc., Tonawanda, NY (United States); Smith, J.H. [National Inst. of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (United States). Metallurgy Div.; Tribolet, R.O. [Tribolet (R.O.), Van Wert, OH (United States)

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-1 Responsibilities Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................... 1

44

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-10 Conversion Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS.................................................................... 1

45

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 APPROVING AND ISSUING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-8 Approval Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. APPROVING AND ISSUING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS .................................................... 1

46

Specific  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Specific Specific energy for pulsed laser rock drilling Z. Xu, a) C. B. Reed, and G. Konercki Technology Development Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60540 R. A. Parker b) Parker Geoscience Consulting, LLC, Arvada, Colorado 80403 B. C. Gahan Gas Technology Institute, Des Plains, Illinois 60018 S. Batarseh c) and R. M. Graves Department of Petroleum Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401 H. Figueroa Petroleos de Venezuela INTEVEP, S.A., Caracas 1070A, Venezuela N. Skinner Halliburton Energy Service, Carrollton, Texas 75006 Í‘Received 20 December 2001; accepted for publication 19 August 2002Í’ Application of advanced high power laser technology to oil and gas well drilling has been attracting significant research interests recently among research institutes, petroleum industries, and universities. Potential laser or laser-aided

47

Technical Basis and Considerations for DOE M 435.1-1 (Appendix A)  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This appendix establishes the technical basis of the order revision process and of each of the requirements included in the revised radioactive waste management order.

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

48

Review of technical documents supporting proposed revisions to EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(D) of the Clean Water Act. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In August 1985 the Environmental Engineering Committee of the Science Advisory Board was asked by the Office of Water Regulations and Standards (OWRS) to review technical documents supporting development of EPA regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act. The Committee was also asked by the Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (OMEP) to review technical documents supporting revisions of the EPA ocean dumping regulations. The Committee chose to review the two sets of documents together, since they both dealt with a common subject, and since they shared, in some respects, a common methodology. The report, however, covers only the review of the OWRS documents, which consist of a set of risk-assessment methodologies (1,2,3,4) for four sludge disposal/reuse options (landfilling, land application/distribution and marketing, incineration, and ocean disposal). The reviews of the OMEP documents are covered in separate Committee reports. The Committee's principal findings are outlined.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

49

Technical note: Erroneous data in {open_quotes}Nuclear Safety Guide, TID-7016, Revision 2,{close_quotes} NUREG/CR-0095, ORNL/NUREG/CSD-6 (1978)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Nuclear Safety Guide, TID-7016 Rev 2 was issued as NUREG/CR-0095 in 1978. Table 2.8 of this report has been found to contain errors. The table was designed to indicate configurations with effective multipliction factors of 0.95. Because of an error in configuration descriptions, some of the configurations have multiplication factors as high as 1.09. A corrected table is available from the undersigned, and Revision 3 of the report is being prepared. Norman L. Pruvost, LANL HSE-6, P. O. Box 1663, M/S-F691, Los Alamos, NM 87545.

Whitesides, G.E. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1991-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

50

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION ............................................................................................................ 1

51

Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, April 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions .......................................... 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision .......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices..........................................1 *DOE Technical Standards Published.......................................... 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions.......................................... 2 *American National Standards Institute

52

Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project technical data catalog quarterly supplement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE)/Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Site-Specific Procedural Agreement for Geologic Repository Site Investigation and Characterization Program requires the DOE to develop and maintain a catalog of data which will be updated and provided to the NRC at least quarterly. This catalog is to include a description of the data; the time (date), place, and method of acquisition; and where the data may be examined. The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP) Technical Data Catalog is published and distributed in accordance with t requirements of the Site-Specific Agreement. The YMP Technical Data Catalog is a report based on reference information contained in the YMP Automated Technical Data Tracking System (ATDT). The reference information is provided by Participants for data acquired or developed in support of the YMP. The Technical Data Catalog is updated quarterly and distributed in the month following the end of each quarter. A complete revision to the catalog is published at the end of each fiscal year. Supplements to the end-of-year edition are published each quarter. These supplements provide information related to new data items not included in previous quarterly updates and data items affected by changes to@ previously published reference information. The Technical Data Catalog, dated September 30, 1994, should be retained as the baseline document for the supplements until the end-of-year revision is published and distributed in October 1995.

NONE

1995-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

53

Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project technical data catalog: Quarterly supplement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE)/Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Site-Specific Procedural Agreement for Geologic Repository Site Investigation and Characterization Program requires the DOE to develop and maintain a catalog of data which will be updated and provided to the NRC at least quarterly. This catalog is to include a description of the data; the time (date), place, and method of acquisition; and where the data may be examined. The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP) Technical Data Catalog is published and distributed-in accordance with the requirements of the Site-Specific Agreement. The YMP Technical Data Catalog is a report based on reference information contained in the YMP Automated Technical Data Tracking System (ATDT). The reference information is provided by Participants for data acquired or developed in support of the YMP. The Technical Data Catalog is updated quarterly and distributed in the month following the end of each quarter. A complete revision to the catalog is published at the end of each fiscal year. Supplements to the end-of-year edition are published each quarter. These supplements provide information related to new data items not included in previous quarterly updates and data items affected by changes to previously published reference information. The Technical Data Catalog, dated September 30, 1994, should be retained as the baseline document for the supplements until the end-of-year revision is published and distributed in October 1995.

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

54

Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project: Technical Data Catalog quarterly supplement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The March 21, 1993, Department of Energy (DOE)/Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Site-Specific Procedural Agreement for Geologic Repository Site Investigation and Characterization Program requires the DOE to develop and maintain a catalog of data which will be updated and provided to the NRC at least quarterly. This catalog is to include a description of the data; the time (date), place, and method of acquisition; and where it may be examined. The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP) Technical Data Catalog is published and distributed in accordance with the requirements of the Site-Specific Agreement. The YMP Technical Data Catalog is a report based on reference information contained in the YMP Automated Technical Data Tracking System (ATDT). The reference information is provided by Participants for data acquired or developed in support of the YMP. The Technical Data Catalog is updated quarterly and published in the month following the end of each quarter. A complete revision to the Catalog is published at the end of each fiscal year. Supplements to the end-of-year edition are published each quarter. These supplements provide information related to new data items not included in previous quarterly updates and data items affected by changes to previously published reference information. The Technical Data Catalog, dated September 30, 1993, should be retained as the baseline document for the supplements until the end-of-year revision is published and distributed in October 1994.

NONE

1994-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

55

OA-50 Technical Qualification Program Standard Procedure, October 2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SP-OA-50-TQP-1 SP-OA-50-TQP-1 Office of Oversight Revision 0 Standard Procedure Page 2 of 19 Office/Facility Specific Qualification Standards build upon the Functional Area Qualification Standards and a functional analysis of the participant's specific office mission requirements and activities. Successful completion of the TQP entails satisfying all competencies contained in the General Technical Base, assigned primary Functional Area and Office/Facility Specific Qualification Standards applicable to the participant's position. Participants should normally successfully complete all TQP requirements within 18 months from the date they entered the program. Upon successful completion of the TQP, Oversight members will start the requalification

56

CRADA Order Revision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CRADA Order Revision CRADA Order Revision Linda Field Patent Counsel Department of Energy Goal CRADA Order DOE O 483.1 CRADA Manual DOE M 483.1-1 CRADA Order DOE O XXXX.X Departmental Directive Program Types of Directives Policies Regulations Orders Notices Manuals Guides Technical Standards Departmental Directive Program Directives Life Cycle Development Coordination Implementation Review (Certification) Development Phase *Orders are uploaded to RevCom for review and comment by all affected parties *60 days to develop draft & submit to MA-90 *Solicits input from stakeholders ( incl. field, contractors, and/or program counsel) Coordination Phase *MA-90 parses directive & sets due dates for review & comment *HQ Directives Points of Contact (DPCs) *Have 45 days to submit official comments on behalf of their

57

REVISION POLICY  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

REVISION POLICY REVISION POLICY March 2007 Data are collected at the million cubic feet per month level and all calculations mentioned below are carried out at that precision. However, the data published in the Form EIA-914 Monthly Gas Production Report are rounded to the nearest 0.01 billion cubic feet per day (roughly 300 million cubic feet per month). Monthly estimates of gross production published in the Natural Gas Monthly at the national level are rounded to billion cubic feet and those for marketed production at the State level are rounded to million cubic feet. The prior month's production estimate will always be revised each month, when the production estimate for the latest data month is released. For example, a June estimate would be revised when a July estimate is released.

58

Revision notice  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

All Natural Gas Reports U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves With Data for 2013 | Release Date: December 4, 2014 | Revision: December 19, 2014 Next Release Date: December...

59

DOE Technical Standards Program: Procedures  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Office of Nuclear Safety The following procedures should be used to write, revise, or maintain a DOE technical standard. They are also used to convert a DOE technical standard to a non-government standard or to form a topical committee. Table of Contents (TSPP-00) Program Overview and Responsibilities (TSPP-01) Initiating DOE Technical Standards (TSPP-02) Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and Interaction with Standards Development Organizations (TSPP-03) Developing DOE Technical Standard (TSPP-04) Coordination of Technical Standards (TSPP-05) - Draft In Concurrence Resolution - TSPP-06-2009 is the currently approved TSPP that addresses coordination of DOE Technical Standards. Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards (TSPP-06)

60

Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 2007 November 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 10-29-2007 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 09-27-2007 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

62

Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-27-2007 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

63

Technical Standards Newsletter - January 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 2008 January 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter - January 2008 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 12-27-2007 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

64

Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2008 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 01-28-2008 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

65

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes To Procedure 200.1-5 Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure Revised Version Issued as P 200.1-5B LM Procedure 200.1-5, Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure of 1/19/07, has undergone revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and updates to the attached Plan. Please replace LM Procedure 200.1-5A with LM Procedure 200.1-5B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents.

66

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

-2 -2 Processing Inactive Records Revised Version Issued as P 200.2-2B LM Procedure 200.2-2A, Processing Internal Inactive Records for Storage of 7/18/07, has undergone revision. The revised procedure includes updated references, definitions, and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.2-2A with LM Procedure 200.2-2B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. Procedure 200.2-2B INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

67

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4-1 4-1 Records Management Self-Assessment Revised Version Issued as P200.4-1B LM Procedure 200.4-1, Records Management Self-Assessment of 4/17/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.4-1A with LM Procedure 200.4-1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 8 pages, 2 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

68

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes Summary of Changes to Procedure 243.1 Records Inventory Revised Version Issued as P 243.1B LM Procedure 243.1A, Records Inventory of 7/18/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and to ensure the references cited and associated forms remain current. Please replace LM Procedure 243.1A with LM Procedure 243.1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 9 pages, 3 attachments

69

Solid waste integrated forecast technical (SWEFT) report: FY1997 to FY 2070 - Document number changed to HNF-0918 at revision 1 - 1/7/97  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This web site provides an up-to-date report on the radioactive solid waste expected to be managed at Hanford`s Solid Waste (SW) Program from onsite and offsite generators. It includes: an overview of Hanford-wide solid waste to be managed by the SW Program; program- level and waste class-specific estimates; background information on waste sources; and Li comparisons with previous forecasts and with other national data sources. The focus of this web site is on low- level mixed waste (LLMW), and transuranic waste (both non-mixed and mixed) (TRU(M)). Some details on low-level waste and hazardous waste are also provided. Currently, this site is reporting data current as of 9/96. The data represent a life cycle forecast covering all reported activities from FY97 through the end of each program`s life cycle.

Valero, O.J.

1996-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

70

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-10  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TECHNICAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES DOE-TSPP-10 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-10 Conversion Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1

71

Revision History  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision History Revision History Rev. 0, August 2012 Original submittal for milestone M3FT-12SN0804032 (Sandia programmatic and classification review) Rev. 1, September 2012 Corrected transposition errors in costing tables; recalculated stainless steel overpacks to be carbon steel; corrected various editorial problems. (SAND2012-7979P) Rev. 2, November 2012 Performed peer review and retitled. Submittal for milestone M2FT-13SN0804031 (formerly milestone M2FT- 12SN0804031) (SAND2012-9737P) Unclassified Unlimited Release Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

72

Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2007 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, April 2007 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

73

Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Newsletter- April 2008 Newsletter- April 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008 Document Status on 03-27-2008 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

74

Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2007 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, February 2007 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

75

Technical Standards Newsletter- July 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Newsletter- July 2006 Newsletter- July 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter- July 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, July 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

76

Technical Standards Newsletter- May 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Newsletter- May 2006 Newsletter- May 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter- May 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, May 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions.......................................... 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation..........................................1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices..........................................1 *DOE Technical Standards Published..........................................1 *Non-Government Standards Actions..........................................2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI)..........................................2

77

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 2005 August 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, August 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

78

Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 2006 November 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, November 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

79

Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 2006 October 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, Ocrober 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

80

Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 2005 July 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, July 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-1 Responsibilities Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES

82

Technical Standards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Review for Technical Standards of Interest Legend: Red Technical Standards Program Activities and Responsibilities Blue Directives Program Activities and Responsibilities...

83

Development of New DOE Technical Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-5 Development Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................. 1 2. DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................... 1

84

Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 2005 November 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, November 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 *ASTM International 2 *American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 *National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2005

85

Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 2005 October 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, October 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 *ASTM International 2 *American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 *National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2005 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005

86

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 USE OF VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARDS AND INTERACTION WITH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 Standards Use / Participation DOE-TSPP-3 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 i PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-TSPP-3 Standards Use / Participation Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program ii CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1

87

Technical approach document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978, Public Law 95-604 (PL95-604), grants the Secretary of Energy the authority and responsibility to perform such actions as are necessary to minimize radiation health hazards and other environmental hazards caused by inactive uranium mill sites. This Technical Approach Document (TAD) describes the general technical approaches and design criteria adopted by the US Department of Energy (DOE) in order to implement remedial action plans (RAPS) and final designs that comply with EPA standards. It does not address the technical approaches necessary for aquifer restoration at processing sites; a guidance document, currently in preparation, will describe aquifer restoration concerns and technical protocols. This document is a second revision to the original document issued in May 1986; the revision has been made in response to changes to the groundwater standards of 40 CFR 192, Subparts A--C, proposed by EPA as draft standards. New sections were added to define the design approaches and designs necessary to comply with the groundwater standards. These new sections are in addition to changes made throughout the document to reflect current procedures, especially in cover design, water resources protection, and alternate site selection; only minor revisions were made to some of the sections. Sections 3.0 is a new section defining the approach taken in the design of disposal cells; Section 4.0 has been revised to include design of vegetated covers; Section 8.0 discusses design approaches necessary for compliance with the groundwater standards; and Section 9.0 is a new section dealing with nonradiological hazardous constituents. 203 refs., 18 figs., 26 tabs.

Not Available

1989-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

IDC System Specification Document.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the system specifications derived to satisfy the system requirements found in the IDC System Requirements Document for the IDC Reengineering Phase 2 project. Revisions Version Date Author/Team Revision Description Authorized by V1.0 12/2014 IDC Reengineering Project Team Initial delivery M. Harris

Clifford, David J.

2014-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

Enclosures Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Enclosures Standing Technical Committee Enclosures Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan, v2011a Revised: December 2011 Committee Chair: 2011 Joseph Lstiburek Kohta Ueno Katie Boucher Building Science Corporation i Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. iii Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Enclosures STC Strategic Plan Overview ............................................................................................ 1

90

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, August 2006 Inside This Isssue: DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

91

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, May 2007 Inside This Issue: DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

92

ATLAS Binary Readout IC (ABC) Specification V5.01 21-Jul-1999 Project Specification  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page 1 ATLAS Binary Readout IC (ABC) Specification V5.01 21-Jul-1999 Project Specification Project Name: ATLAS Binary Chip (ABC) Version: 5.01 Revision History Revision Change Description, Pages Revised and formatting. M. French 21-Jul-99 #12;Page 2 ATLAS Binary Readout IC (ABC) Specification V5.01 21-Jul-1999

California at Santa Cruz, University of

93

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 2005 May 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - May 2005 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions........................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP..................................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices.................................................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Revisions................................................. 1 DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated.................................................... 1 Non-Government Standards Actions..................................................... 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI)........................................ 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)................................... 2

94

Department of Energy Technical Standards Program | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Technical Standards Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Department of Energy Technical Standards Program The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE. Online Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Archive Monthly Status Reports Subscribe RSS logo Subscribe to receive the latest DOE Approved Technical Standards via an RSS feed. Take Action Write, revise, or maintain a DOE Technical Standard Review a DOE Technical Standard at RevCom for TSP Additional Information Technical Standards Program Information

95

Technical Articles  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Articles science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Technical Articles National security depends on science and technology. The United States relies on Los...

96

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 263: Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfields, Nevada Test Site, Revision 0, DOE/NV--535 UPDATED WITH RECORD OF TECHNICAL CHANGE No.1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 263, the Area 25 Building 4839 Leachfield, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the US Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 263 is comprised of the Corrective Action Site 25-05-04 sanitary leachfield and associated collection system. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan is used in combination with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1998d). The Leachfield Work Plan was developed to streamline investigations at Leachfield Corrective Action Units by incorporating management, technical, quality assurance, health and safety, public involvement, field sampling, and waste management information common to a set of Corrective Action Units with similar site histories and characteristics into a single document that can be referenced. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details specific to Corrective Action Unit 263. Corrective Action Unit 263 is located southwest of Building 4839, in the Central Propellant Storage Area. Operations in Building 4839 from 1968 to 1996 resulted in effluent releases to the leachfield and associated collection system. In general, effluent released to the leachfield consisted of sanitary wastewater from a toilet, urinal, lavatory, and drinking fountain located within Building 4839. The subsurface soils in the vicinity of the collection system and leachfield may have been impacted by effluent containing contaminants of potential concern generated by support activities associated with the Building 4839 operations.

US DOE Nevada Operations Office

1999-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

97

Technical Standards Newsletter - March 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2006 March 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - March 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - March 2006 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Attention Technical Standards Managers ........................................................................ 1 Technical Standards Program Topical Committee Developments ..................................... 1 A Note from the Manager .............................................................................................. 2 Welcome Aboard .......................................................................................................... 3 Standards Development to be Pursued by New Center for Distributed Power ................. 4 Year 2000 Revisions of ISO 9000 Standards Released ................................................... 4

98

SG Network System Requirements Specification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SG Network System Requirements Specification SG Network System Requirements Specification Interim Release 3 5/17/2010 - 2 - Table of Contents Document History ....................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Revision History .......................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Preface........................................................................................................................................................ - 4 - Authors........................................................................................................................................................ - 6 -

99

Protocol, Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 Protocol, Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 October 22, 2003 Technical Qualification Program Procedure (OA-50-TQP-1) This procedure implements the Office of ES&H Evaluations Technical Qualification Program (TQP) per the criteria contained in DOE Manual 426.1-1 "Federal Technical Capability Manual". Key elements of the program include: identifying personnel required to participate in the TQP, identifying, developing, approving, revising and updating individual qualification requirements, evaluating staff members against the assigned Technical Qualification Standards and documenting the approval of equivalencies, establishing and updating individual development plans, training

100

Functional Specifications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Functional Specifications Functional Specifications Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) OSCARS Case Study Documentation User Manual FAQ Design Specifications Functional Specifications Notifications Publications Authorization Policy Default Attributes Message Security Clients For Developers Interfaces Links Hardware Requirements DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Functional Specifications OSCARS Reservation Manager - Functional Specifications Year 3 Update (DRAFT)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT Purpose This procedure outlines the process for registering a project to develop a DOE Technical Standard, to perform certain periodic updates (revisions, reaffirmations, inactivations for new design, and reinstatements) to DOE Technical Standards, or to register a person's or organization's intent to work with a non-Government standards body to prepare or revise a non-Government standard. The procedure also describes the approval process required before a project can be registered. Registering a Technical Standard Project (TSPP-04) More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000

102

revision:20090902 modified:20090903  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

871 revision:2009­09­02 modified:2009­09­03 A trichotomy of countable, stable, unsuperstable and DMS 0600940 and Israel Science Foundation Grant no. 242/03. Publica­ tion 871. 1 #12; 871 revision of formulas (see Definition 2.3). The origins of these 2 #12; 871 revision:2009­09­02 modified:2009

Shelah, Saharon

103

OSH technical reference manual  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In an evaluation of the Department of Energy (DOE) Occupational Safety and Health programs for government-owned contractor-operated (GOCO) activities, the Department of Labor`s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recommended a technical information exchange program. The intent was to share written safety and health programs, plans, training manuals, and materials within the entire DOE community. The OSH Technical Reference (OTR) helps support the secretary`s response to the OSHA finding by providing a one-stop resource and referral for technical information that relates to safe operations and practice. It also serves as a technical information exchange tool to reference DOE-wide materials pertinent to specific safety topics and, with some modification, as a training aid. The OTR bridges the gap between general safety documents and very specific requirements documents. It is tailored to the DOE community and incorporates DOE field experience.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Technical Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Technical Guidance, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security develops and issues Government-wide and Department-wide technical guidance to ensure that classified nuclear...

105

Design Specifications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Design Design Specifications Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) OSCARS Case Study Documentation User Manual FAQ Design Specifications Functional Specifications Notifications Publications Authorization Policy Default Attributes Message Security Clients For Developers Interfaces Links Hardware Requirements DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Design Specifications OSCARS Reservation Manager - Design Specifications Year 3 Update (DRAFT) David Robertson, Chin Guok

106

Microsoft Word - 911168_0 NGNP Fuel Specification Basis_rel.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Revision 0 ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEXT GENERATION NUCLEAR PLANT (NGNP) WITH HYDROGEN PRODUCTION Technical Basis for NGNP Fuel Performance and Quality Requirements Prepared...

107

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION........................................................................................................... 1

108

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 ESTABLISHING THE NEED FOR A TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-2 Need Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1

109

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-9  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-9 Maintenance Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE...................................................................................................... 1

110

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-4 Registration Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. REGISTERING THE PROJECT................................................................................................... 1

111

Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement - August 29,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Project Justification Statement - Program Project Justification Statement - August 29, 2012 Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement - August 29, 2012 August 29, 2012 DOE Technical Standards Program Project Justification Statement As part of the new justification process for developing or revising DOE Technical Standards, organizations, people are asked to provide the listed information (in numeric format) in a Project Justification Statement (PJS) prior to submitting the requisite Project Registration and Approval Request form (F 1300.5). Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-2-2013, Initiating DOE Technical Standards Active Project Justification Statement DOE-TSPP-7-2013, Maintaining DOE Technical Standards

112

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 The Department's Revised Implementation Plan (IP) for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-3 renews the Department's commitment to maintaining the technical capability necessary to safely manage and operate defense nuclear facilities. Retaining highly qualified employees in critical technical skills areas is vital to the maintenance of these technical capabilities. The Department has therefore committed in the revised R? to the development of a model that offices can use to proactively manage and preserve critical technical capabilities. During the

113

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

114

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

115

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 2008 May 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2008 Document Status on 04-25-2008 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2008 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2008

116

FTCP Site Specific Information- Carlsbad Field Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Site Specific Information includes Annual Workforce Analysis & Staffing Plan Reports, and Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Self-Assessment.

117

Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review is published to inform readers of various technical activities within the Department, promote exchange of ideas, and give credit to personnel who are achieving the results. The report is presented in two parts: technical achievements and publication abstracts. The first is divided into seven sections, each of which reports on an engineering division and its specific activities related to nuclear tests, nuclear explosives, weapons, energy systems, engineering sciences, magnetic fusion, and materials fabrication.

Carr, R.B.; Denney, R.M. (eds.)

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Technical information  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Home> Commercial Buildings Home> Technical Information > Estimation of Standard Errors Estimation of Standard Errors Sampling error is the difference between the survey estimate...

119

Technical Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Dec 12, 2013 ... Technical Report Series: DCC-2013-13. Departamento de Cięncia de Computadores. Faculdade de Cięncias da Universidade do Porto.

Filipe Brandao

2013-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

120

Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 2005 September 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - September 2005 Inside this issue: TSP Manager's Notes.................................................................................................................................... 1 The Halo Effect: American National Standards and the rest ............................................................................. 2 Standards Development for Reporting of Declarable Substances....................................................................... 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight............................................................................................................ 8 DOE Revises "Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health Into Facility

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

DOE-TSPP-06; Coordination of DOE Technical Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Date: July 2004 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-6 Coordination Revision: 6 Date: July 2004 DOE Technical Standards Program 2 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 3 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION......................................................................................................3

122

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-6  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Date: July 1, 2009 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 Coordination DOE-TSPP-6 Revision: 7 DOE Technical Standards Program Date: July 1, 2009 1 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE....................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Applicability .................................................................................................................1 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION...............................................................................................1

123

Development of Revised Energy Standards for Texas Buildings: Preliminary Results  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for Energy Studies (CES) at The University of Texas at Austin is revising and updating the nonresidential building portion of the Energy Conservation Manual. The proposed revision is a Texas-specific adaptation of ASHRAE Standard 90.1P ("Energy Efficient...

Hunn, B. D.; Jones, J. W.; Silver, S. C.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Standards Newsletter - August 2007 Standards Newsletter - August 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 07-27-2007 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 Technical Standards, Newsletter-August 2007 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2007

125

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-1713-1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date October 1997 / Revised May 1998 4. Title and Subtitle EVALUATION Zhang, and W. Ronald Hudson 8. Performing Organization Report No. 0-1713-1 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)9

Texas at Austin, University of

126

Technical Position, NSTP 2003-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This technical position supplements and clarifies Department of Energy's (DOE) Policy expectations for the proper understanding and implementation of administrative controls that perform a specific safety function.

127

Revised Spring 2008 NIH Public Access Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised Spring 2008 NIH Public Access Policy Notice Number: NOT-OD-08-033 - (See Notice NOT-OD-08-161 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008), the NIH voluntary Public Access Policy (NOT-OD-05-022) is now mandatory shall implement the public access policy in a manner consistent with copyright law. Specifics 1. The NIH

128

Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) Plan for Corrective Action Unit 357: Mud Pits and Waste Dump, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Record of Technical Change No. 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) plan was prepared as a characterization and closure report for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 357, Mud Pits and Waste Dump, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. The CAU consists of 14 Corrective Action Sites (CASs) located in Areas 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). All of the CASs are found within Yucca Flat except CAS 25-15-01 (Waste Dump). Corrective Action Site 25-15-01 is found in Area 25 in Jackass Flat. Of the 14 CASs in CAU 357, 11 are mud pits, suspected mud pits, or mud processing-related sites, which are by-products of drilling activities in support of the underground nuclear weapons testing done on the NTS. Of the remaining CASs, one CAS is a waste dump, one CAS contains scattered lead bricks, and one CAS has a building associated with Project 31.2. All 14 of the CASs are inactive and abandoned. Clean closure with no further action of CAU 357 will be completed if no contaminants are detected above preliminary action levels. A closure report will be prepared and submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for review and approval upon completion of the field activities. Record of Technical Change No. 1 is dated 3/2004.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-06-25T23:59:59.000Z

129

Revised 4/10/2002 _____________________________ Environment, Health, & Safety _________ __________________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 4/10/2002 _____________________________ Environment, Health, & Safety to all potentially exposed personnel). · Specific work practices, labeling, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment used for working at Biosafety levels 1 and 2. · Disinfection, spill response

Eisen, Michael

130

Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis (Revised)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Southeast Regional Clean Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis Revised Joyce McLaren Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-49192 Revised April 2011 ERRATA SHEET NREL REPORT/PROJECT NUMBER: TP-6A20-49192 TITLE: Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis AUTHOR(S): Joyce McLaren ORIGINAL PUBLICATION DATE: January 2011 DATE OF CORRECTIONS (MM/YYYY): 04/2011 The following figures and tables were replaced: Page vii, Figure ES-2 Page ix, Table ES-1 Page 12, Table 1 Page 20, Figure 10 Page 51, Table 11 Page 52, Figure 18 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401

131

Questions and answers based on revised 10 CFR Part 20  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

NUREG/CR-6204 is a collection of questions and answers that were originally issued in seven sets and which pertain to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions came from both outside and within the NRC. The answers were compiled and provided by NRC staff within the offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Research, the Office of State Programs, and the five regional offices. Although all of the questions and answers have been reviewed by attorneys in the NRC Office of the General Counsel, they do not constitute official legal interpretations relevant to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions and answers do, however, reflect NRC staff decisions and technical options on aspects of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 regulatory requirements. This NUREG is being made available to encourage communication among the public, industry, and NRC staff concerning the major revisions of the NRC`s standards for protection against radiation.

Borges, T.; Stafford, R.S.; Lu, P.Y. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Carter, D. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Federal Technical Capability Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Technical Capability Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Home About the FTCP FTCP Topics FTCP Meetings Performance Indicator Reports Guiding Documents Qualifying Official Training Approaches FTCP Plans, Reports & Issue Papers Workforce Analysis & Staffing Site Specific Information Nuclear Executive Leadership Training General Information 2004-1 FTCP Commitments FTCP Correspondence Site Map Contact Us Quick Reference Departmental Representative to the DNFSB Facility Representative Safety System Oversight DOE Integrated Safety Management National Training Center DOE Directives Program DOE Technical Standards Program DOE Phone Book HSS Logo FTCP FTCP Topics DOE Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2006 - 2011) New Directions in Learning: Building a DOE University System May 4, 2007, the Deputy Secretary memorandum designating Karen Boardman the FTCP Chairperson.

133

2009 Revisions EIA-914  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

for Texas, which was partially the cause for the review of the EIA-914, which, in turn, led to the development and implementation of this new methodology. Downward revisions in...

134

DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure describes how topical committees are organized and recognized under the Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES

135

DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure describes how topical committees are organized and recognized under the Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009

136

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Update Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on AddThis.com... About Take Action to Save Energy Partner With DOE Activities Solar Decathlon Building America Research Innovations Research Tools Building Science Education Climate-Specific Guidance

138

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Responsibilities - August Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as DOEComponents") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

139

Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

1995-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

140

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures The following procedures should be used to write, revise, or maintain a DOE technical standard. They are also used to convert a DOE technical standard to a non-government standard or to form a topical committee. TSPP September 2013 September 16, 2013 DOE-TSPP-1-2013, Program Overview and Responsibilities This procedure describes the responsibilities of persons who are charged with implementing the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP). September 16, 2013 DOE-TSPP-2-2013, Initiating DOE Technical Standards This procedure provides guidance on how to establish and justify the need for a Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standard and register a DOE

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

ATLAS SCT L1 Trigger Latency Budget Specification V1.00 15-Oct-1999 ATLAS Specification  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page 1 ATLAS SCT L1 Trigger Latency Budget Specification V1.00 15-Oct-1999 ATLAS Specification Name: ATLAS SCT L1 Trigger Latency Budget Version: 1.00 Revision History Revision Change Description, Pages-Oct-1999 #12;Page 2 ATLAS SCT L1 Trigger Latency Budget Specification V1.00 15-Oct-1999 Table

California at Santa Cruz, University of

142

revision:19960317 modified:19960317  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

restrict our­ self to certain concrete classes then we may be able to retain compactness. In this paper we375 revision:1996­03­17 modified:1996­03­17 Some Compact Logics ­ Results in ZFC Alan H. Mekler order logic is so strong that it fails to have nice model theoretic properties such as compactness

Shelah, Saharon

143

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

144

DOE-TSPP-6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards 6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure provides guidance for approving and issuing the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as Technical Standards Program (TSP) participants) working to the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program. DOE-TSPP-6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-7-2013, Maintaining DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-6, Coordination of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009

145

HNF-37489-FP Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HNF-37489-FP HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age Energy Facility Contractow Group May 3 - 8,2008 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Pmject Hanford Management CcntractOr for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC0696RL132W FLUOR, P.O. Box I000

146

ADR Revised Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

147

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03, Specific Issues on Applicabilit...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Technical Specifications. Specifically, this guidance reaffirms that quality assurance (QA) controls required by 10 CFR 830 are not in any way limited by language...

148

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 20042009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix G Appendix G U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2004­2009 (Revised March 2004) Statement of the Board The Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 directed the U-level radioactive waste. The Act also established the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as an indepen dent

149

FIS Technical Services Page 1 5/23/2006 RPM Installation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FIS Technical Services Page 1 5/23/2006 RPM Installation Version 4.5.1.11 Revised: April 2005 clicking on an empty space on your desktop and choosing "new" and then "folder"). 2. Visit http://www.fis Desktop using the drop down menu next to the Save in text box as in the image below. #12;FIS Technical

Sibille, Etienne

150

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for the routine maintenance of DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS

151

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for the routine maintenance of DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS

152

DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for approving and issuing DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications APPROVING AND ISSUING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009

153

DOE-TSPP-9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees 9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees DOE-TSPP-9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure describes how topical committees are organized and recognized under the Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as TSP participants) working to the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program. DOE-TSPP-9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees More Documents & Publications TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus

154

Sponsoring Organizations | Scientific and Technical Information Program  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Sponsoring Organizations Sponsoring Organizations Print page Print page Email page Email page U.S. Department of Energy Sponsoring Organizations for DOE-funded Scientific and Technical Information (STI) (Reference DOE O 241.1B, Scientific and Technical Information Management, Section 4 REQUIREMENTS, item g) The following list includes the current USDOE Sponsoring Organizations identified as funding research and development and other technology activities which result in scientific and technical information. DOE Program Offices and the Program Offices' respective subprogram(s) which may fund research are included. This list will be revised as needed to include additional offices or to reflect current Departmental funding organizations. Questions or input may be provided to stip@osti.gov. Current

155

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-11  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Revision: 2 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. ORGANIZATION OF TOPICAL COMMITTEES .......................................................................... 1

156

Technical Baseline Summary Description for the Tank Farm Contractor  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a revision of the document titled above, summarizing the technical baseline of the Tank Farm Contractor. It is one of several documents prepared by CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. to support the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Tank Waste Retrieval and Disposal Mission at Hanford.

TEDESCHI, A.R.

2000-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

157

DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 2000 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure outlines the process for registering a project to develop a DOE Technical Standard, to perform certain periodic updates (revisions, reaffirmations, inactivations for new design, and reinstatements) to DOE Technical Standards, or to register a person's or organization's intent to work with a non-Government standards body to prepare or revise a non-Government standard. The procedure also describes the approval process required before a project can be registered. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories

158

DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 , Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure outlines the process for registering a project to develop a DOE Technical Standard, to perform certain periodic updates (revisions, reaffirmations, inactivations for new design, and reinstatements) to DOE Technical Standards, or to register a person's or organization's intent to work with a non-Government standards body to prepare or revise a non-Government standard. The procedure also describes the approval process required before a project can be registered. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories

159

Cumulative Revision Map  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Unlike static documents, version-controlled documents are edited by one or more authors over a certain period of time. Examples include large scale computer code, papers authored by a team of scientists, and online discussion boards. Such collaborative revision process makes traditional document modeling and visualization techniques inappropriate. In this paper we propose a new visualization technique for version-controlled documents that reveals interesting authoring patterns in papers, computer code and Wikipedia articles. The revealed authoring patterns are useful for the readers, participants in the authoring process, and supervisors.

Kim, Seungyeon; Lebanon, Guy

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

10 CFR Part 830 Nuclear Safety Technical Positions  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Technical Positions to directives issued by Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy provide clarification for specific applications of the requirements in DOE orders, rules, and other directives.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Extraction Utility Design Specification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Extraction Extraction Utility Design Specification May 13, 2013 Document Version 1.10 1 Revision History Date Version Section and Titles Author Summary of Change January 15, 2010 1.0 All Eric Morgan, Dekker, Ltd. Initial Draft Document January 19, 2010 1.1 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Document update with EM team review notes January 20, 2010 1.2 2.1.1 EM Project Team Document Review January 27, 2010 1.3 All Bruce Bartells Final Draft Review May 10, 2010 1.4.1 2.8 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Section Update May 14, 2010 1.4.2 2.3.1 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. System Tables Added May 17, 2010 1.4.3 2.3 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Enhancements Update June 29, 2010 1.5 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Revised for Version

162

Technical Safety Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Requirements Safety Requirements FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: Contractor has developed, maintained, and received DOE Field Office Approval for the necessary operating conditions of a facility. The facility has also maintained an inventory of safety class and safety significant systems and components. REQUIREMENTS: ď‚· 10 CFR 830.205, Nuclear Safety Rule. ď‚· DOE-STD-3009-2002, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses. ď‚· DOE-STD-1186-2004, Specific Administrative Controls. Guidance: ď‚· DOE G 423.1-1, Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Technical Safety Requirements. ď‚· NSTP 2003-1, Use of Administrative Controls for Specific Safety Functions. Performance Objective 1: Contractor Program Documentation

163

INL Technical Publications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Publications This site contains Idaho National Laboratory scientific and technical information products that have been issued for unlimited distribution. Those products...

164

Proposed Revisions for Regents Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Proposed Revisions for Regents Policy: Faculty Tenure Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty family friendliness for probationary period #12;Basis for Revisions of Faculty Tenure Policy · Changed definitions of Academic Freedom and Responsibility required changes in the tenure policy. · As more untenured

Amin, S. Massoud

165

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

predictions October 1964 Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL #12;REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates estimate and does not change the 30-year and 70-year dose estimates made on the basis of the originalREPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates for 1964-1965 and verification of the 1963

166

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 August 29, 2013 - 4:19pm...

167

Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4...

168

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) This schedule covers audiovisual and related records created by or for...

169

Technical Consultant Contract  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Technical Consultant Contract, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

170

DOE Approved Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE.

171

Technical Consultant Report Template  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Technical Consultant Report Template, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

172

Revised (05/06)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste. Submit Copy 1, 2, and 3 to DOE, Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center and retain Copy 4.

173

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

174

DOE-TSPP-6, Coordination of DOE Technical Standards - July 2004 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2004 2004 DOE-TSPP-6, Coordination of DOE Technical Standards - July 2004 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - July 26, 2004 This procedure provides guidance on the formal coordination of DOE Technical Standards in the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP). The purpose of coordination of draft technical standards is to solicit and receive comments from interested persons and organizations in order to improve and correct technical standards. DOE Technical Standards are coordinated through the electronic RevCom for TSP process. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, integrating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical

175

DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, , Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure describes the responsibilities of persons who are charged with implementing the DOE Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000

176

DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure describes the responsibilities of persons who are charged with implementing the DOE Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009

177

DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary -2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs). This procedure applies to all Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as Technical Standards Program (TSP) participants) working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program. DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards

178

Revised 4/9/2002 ________________________ _____Environment, Health, & Safety _____ ______________________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 4/9/2002 ________________________ _____Environment, Health, & Safety in the preparation or transport of dangerous goods by air. Other function-specific training may be required an understanding of the health effects of hazardous materials on the body. · Demonstrate an ability to identify

Eisen, Michael

179

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) These Greensburg fact sheet sheets help citizens understand what they can do as a part of the focus. Saving energy & water, using renewable energy (particular interest in small wind), driving "green", general sustainability, & living green. 45138.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE (Fact Sheet) Rebuilding Greensburg, Kansas, as a Model Green Community: A Case Study; NREL's Technical Assistance to Greensburg, June 2007-May 2009 From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding with Renewable Energy after Disaster,

180

FAR Card: Technical specifiers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

specifiers specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product."

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

182

FOR OFFICERS REVISED AND PUBLISHED  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Council 2007 Revision HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE #12;To Dartmouth Club Officers: The development) 646-2253 Career Services (603) 646-2215 Club Mailings, Lists, Changes (603) 646-3497 Club Scholarships ............................................................................................................................ 8 Public Information Chair

Lotko, William

183

GETEM Manuals and Revision Notes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Please refer to these manuals and revision notes prior to downloading and running the Geothermal Electricity Technology Evaluation Model (GETEM). Because this is a beta version, you are urged to...

184

Senior Technical Safety Manager  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Program Technical Program Manager Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1178-2004 May 2013 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program. Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to the Office of Leadership and Career Manager, Technical Qualification Program (TQP), Albuquerque Complex. This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... ii

185

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at Hanford. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 835, DOELAP, DOE-RL, ORP, PNSO, and Hanford contractor requirements. The dosimetry system is operated by PNNL’s Hanford External Dosimetry Program (HEDP) which provides dosimetry services to all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee (HPDAC) which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture (ERICA) database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2009-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

186

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers (TIO) serve as the principal DOE or NNSA office point of contact and assistant to, and liaison with, the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) that serves as the Department's office charged with the Scientific and Technical Information Program (STIP). The TIOs are to be familiar with the STI Programs within their Office they represent (given they have contracting financial assistance and/or acquisition activities) and for their major site/facility management contractor(s) STI Program to discern compliance with the DOE O 241.1B. They must maintain an up-to-date knowledge-base of the STI Program activities and provide timely feedback on issues as they emerge. While

187

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Provides requirements and responsibilities to ensure recruitment and hiring of technically capable personnel to retain critical technical capabilities within the Department at all times. Cancels DOE M 426.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 426.1.

2004-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

188

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 2 of 25 Page intentionally left blank ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 3 of 25 Chemical Sciences Division ISM Plan May 2012 Page 1.0 Policy Statement 5 2.0 Description of Division/Organization, Mission and Scope of Work 5 3.0 Accountability 7 3.01 Line Management Responsibility and Accountability 8 3.02 Specific Principal Investigator Responsibilities 8 3.03 Work Lead EH&S Responsibilities 8 3.04 CSD personnel EH&S Responsibilities (Non-Supervisor or Work Lead) 9 3.05 Students 10 3.06 Work Off-Site 10 3.07 Telecommuting 11

189

River Corridor Project Workplace Air Monitoring Technical Basis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides the technical basis by which the workplace air monitoring and sampling program is operated in the River Corridor Project (RCP). Revision 2 addresses and incorporates changes in the air monitoring program drivers and implementing documents which occurred after the previous revision was issued. This revision also includes an additional RCP project to make Revision 2 applicable to the entire RCP. These changes occurred in the following areas: (1) Changes resulting from the conversion of the Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual (HSRCM-1) into the Project Hanford Radiological Control Manual (F-5173). HNF-5173 is now the implementing document for 10CFR835. (2) Changes resulting from the issue of new and revised Hanford Site implementing procedures. (3) Changes resulting from the issue of new and revised, as well as the cancellation of RCP implementing procedures. (4) Addition of the 200 Area Accelerated Deactivation Project (ADP). (5) Modification of some air sampling/monitoring locations to better meet the needs of facility operations. (6) Changes resulting from the RCP reorganization.

MANTOOTH, D.S.

2001-01-17T23:59:59.000Z

190

DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance on how to determine if a technical standard is needed. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government

191

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs), also referred to as non-Government standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government

192

DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - July 1, 2009 This procedure provides guidance on how to determine if a technical standard is needed. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS

193

DOE-TSPP-4-2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards -2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-4-2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure provides guidance for developing the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the Standards Developing Organization (SDO). The DOE representative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as Technical Standards Program (TSP) participants) working to the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards

194

Technical Standards Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Technical Standards Program (TSP) promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards by the Department of Energy (DOE), provides DOE with the means to develop needed technical standards, and manages overall technical standards information, activities, issues, and interactions. Cancels DOE O 1300.2A. Canceled by DOE O 252.1A

1999-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

195

Federal Technical Capability  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This directive defines requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Cancels DOE M 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

196

Technical Standards Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. Admin Chg 1 dated 3-12-13.

2011-02-23T23:59:59.000Z

197

Technical Qualification Program Description - Integrated Support Center, Chicago Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPART ENT of Office of DEPART ENT of Office of ENERGY I Science Integrated Support Center Chicago Office Technical Qualification Program Description ~~~~~~'?ÂŁH(.k:1/Zi.':"r'fl. ; ;!. / ; h tJ/ tl oxa nn e E. Purucker, M anager ~ Office of Science - Chicago Office Technical Qualification Program Description Revision 2, November 2010 CONCURRENCE The Office of Science-Chicago Office (SC-CH) is the sponsor for this Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Description. This is applicable to SC-CH, New Brunswick Laboratory (NBLL Ames Site Office (AMSO) and Argonne Site Office (ASO). These offices are in joint participation and endorsement of the SC-CH Technical Qualification Program process and have also provided concurrence below. The SC-CH Manager is the approval authority for this program description.

198

GENERAL TECHNICAL BASELINE QUALIFICATION STANDARD SUGGESTED STUDY REFERENCES  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References 2007 revision This list provides suggested study references for the technical competencies of the General Technical Base Qualification Standard (DOE STD 1146-2007). More comprehensive resources are available through the DOE Online Learning Center's training courses and the study guides available through the Federal Technical Capability Panel web site. The Uniform Resource Locaters for these sites are listed in the Standard. This list is arranged by Technical Competency, followed by the suggested reference source. Some competencies deal directly with DOE or Federal directives, and they are also the reference. In a few cases, the Study Guide is the only concise source, and appropriate sections are listed.

199

Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments DRAFT OMB CIRCULAR A-76 (NOVEMBER 14, 2002) REVIEW COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS: The Department of Energy (DOE) supports the overarching goal of OMB Circular A-76 that agencies should obtain "the best deal to the Taxpayer." We also support revisions to the Circular that "Keep the Process Moving" with the end result being: Faster/Cheaper Competitions; Improved Performance and Measures; Enhanced/Expanded Competition; Fairness; Realizing Significant Savings; and the Redirection of Resources to Mission Critical Requirements. Upon review of the draft Circular, the Department believes the proposed changes to Circular reflect a general improvement over the current version. The Department does, however, have

200

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Policy Flash Revised Continuing Appropriations...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers: Serve as the DOE element representatives to STIP and ensure that STI objectives and requirements are incorporated into strategic planning, management information plans, life-cycle procedures from project initiation to close-out, and contract language as appropriate. Coordinate with contractor STI managers and have adequate familiarity with STI activities to discern contractor compliance with the CRD portion of this directive. Coordinate the implementation of appropriate review and release procedures by DOE elements, DOE contractors, and financial assistance recipients as appropriate. Serve as Releasing Officials or coordinate designation and official

202

2009 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O. Box 5400 O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 The Honorable A.I. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: MAR 1 9 2009 Enclosed is the Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1. This plan has been updated to identify that all Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE's mission have been completed. This revised

203

Technical Basis for DOE Policy 420.1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HS-0006 HS-0006 TECHNICAL BASIS FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NUCLEAR SAFETY POLICY, DOE POLICY 420.1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY OFFICE OF NUCLEAR SAFETY JULY 2011 i Executive Summary This document provides the technical basis for the Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 420.1, Nuclear Safety Policy, dated 2-8-2011. It includes an analysis of the revised Policy to determine whether it provides the necessary and sufficient high-level expectations that will lead DOE to establish and implement appropriate requirements to assure protection of the public, workers, and the environment from the hazards of DOE's operation of nuclear facilities. In developing the revised Policy and performing this analysis, DOE reviewed the current Nuclear

204

2007 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7,2007 7,2007 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004-290 1 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, Revision 2, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1. This plan has been updated to identify the completed and remaining Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE'S mission. The plan is approved and issued for implementation, effective

205

Revised evaluations for ENDF/B-VI Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to report on revised cross-section evaluations for 17 nuclides that have been prepared for ENDF/B-VI Revision 2. The nuclides considered include five fission products and various isotopes of cadmium and hafnium. The previous ENDF/B-VI evaluations for these 17 nuclides were carried over from ENDF/B-V and were completed in the 1974--1980 time period. By utilizing the experimental data that have become available since 1980 the revised evaluations will result in significant improvements in the evaluated nuclear data files. The primary emphasis was placed on the resolved and unresolved resonance regions, but new experimental data were also used to improve the cross sections for energies above the unresolved resonance region. Negative elastic scattering cross sections were encountered in some of the previous evaluations; since the revised evaluations use multilevel Breit-Wigner (MLBW) parameters, rather than single-level Breit-Wigner (SLBW), this problem is eliminated.

Wright, R.Q.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

207

Nevada Revised Statutes | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Revised Statutes Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Nevada Revised StatutesLegal Published NA Year Signed or Took...

208

Extraction Utility Design Specification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Extraction Utility Extraction Utility Design Specification January 11, 2011 Document Version 1.9 1 Revision History Date Version Section and Titles Author Summary of Change January 15, 2010 1.0 All Eric Morgan, Dekker, Ltd. Initial Draft Document January 19, 2010 1.1 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Document update with EM team review notes January 20, 2010 1.2 2.1.1 EM Project Team Document Review January 27, 2010 1.3 All Bruce Bartells Final Draft Review May 10, 2010 1.4.1 2.8 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Section Update May 14, 2010 1.4.2 2.3.1 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. System Tables Added May 17, 2010 1.4.3 2.3 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Enhancements Update June 29, 2010 1.5 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Revised for Version 8.0.20100628 July 14, 2010 1.5.1 2.8 Igor Pedan,

209

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at Hanford. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 835, DOELAP, DOE-RL, ORP, PNSO, and Hanford contractor requirements. The dosimetry system is operated by PNNL’s Hanford External Dosimetry Program (HEDP) which provides dosimetry services to all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee (HPDAC) which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. Rev. 0 marks the first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture (ERICA) database. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Revision Log: Rev. 0 (2/25/2005) Major revision and expansion. Rev. 0.1 (3/12/2007) Minor revision. Updated Chapters 5, 6 and 9 to reflect change in default ring calibration factor used in HEDP dose calculation software. Factor changed from 1.5 to 2.0 beginning January 1, 2007. Pages on which changes were made are as follows: 5.23, 5.69, 5.78, 5.80, 5.82, 6.3, 6.5, 6.29, 9.2.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2007-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

210

Building America House Simulation Protocols (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

House House Simulation Protocols Robert Hendron and Cheryn Engebrecht National Renewable Energy Laboratory Revised October 2010 Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory For the U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program ii NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process,

211

Cryogenic System Revised June 1994  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chapter 9. Cryogenic System Revised June 1994 9.1. Introduction 9.2. Heat Loads and Refrigeration Duties -- 175 -- #12; 176 Cryogenic System #12; Cryogenic System 177 9.3. Two Phase Helium Cooling 9.4. The Refrigerator and Control #12; 178 Cryogenic System 9.5. Cryogen Delivery and Control 9.6. Three Cooling

Brookhaven National Laboratory - Experiment 821

212

(Revised May 25, 2012) Radioactivity  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(Revised May 25, 2012) Radioactivity GOALS (1) To gain a better understanding of naturally-occurring. (3) To measure the amount of "background radiation" from natural sources. (4) To test whether and man-made radiation sources. (2) To use a Geiger-Mueller tube to detect both beta and gamma radiation

Collins, Gary S.

213

A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth (Diptera: Tethinidae) GEORGE A O G Y · N U M B E R 6 1 9 A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth. Mathis. A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth (Diptera: Tethinidae

Mathis, Wayne N.

214

Technical Review Panel Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Evaluation and Identification of future R&D on eight Advanced Reactor Concepts, conducted April - September 2012 December 2012 Public release version 2 Public release version 3 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the Technical Review Panel Process ............................................................... 5 2. Technical Review Panel Criteria ......................................................................................... 6 3. Concept Summaries ........................................................................................................... 8

215

Web Survey Technical Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Glisson,W.B. Welland,R.C. DCS Technical Report Series pp 27 Dept of Computing Science, University of Glasgow

Glisson, W.B.; Welland, R.C.

216

DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for developing DOE Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the standards developing organization (SDO). The DOE representative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

217

DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, , Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for developing DOE Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the standards developing organization (SDO). The DOErepresentative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

218

DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for developing DOE Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the standards developing organization (SDO). The DOErepresentative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

219

VisPort: Web-Based Access to Community-Specific Visualization Functionality [Shedding New Light on Exploding Stars: Visualization for TeraScale Simulation of Neutrino-Driven Supernovae (Final Technical Report)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The VisPort visualization portal is an experiment in providing Web-based access to visualization functionality from any place and at any time. VisPort adopts a service-oriented architecture to encapsulate visualization functionality and to support remote access. Users employ browser-based client applications to choose data and services, set parameters, and launch visualization jobs. Visualization products â?? typically images or movies â?? are viewed in the userâ??s standard Web browser. VisPort emphasizes visualization solutions customized for specific application communities. Finally, VisPort relies heavily on XML, and introduces the notion of visualization informatics -? the formalization and specialization of information related to the process and products of visualization.

Baker, M Pauline

2007-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

220

Water Resources Research Center Annual Technical Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Water Resources Research Center Annual Technical Report FY 1999 Introduction WATER PROBLEMS AND ISSUES OF MISSOURI The water problems and issues in the State of Missouri can be separated into three general areas: 1) water quality, 2) water quantity, and 3) water policy. Each of Missouri's specific

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Federal Technical Capability Manual provides the process for the recruitment, deployment, development, and retention of Federal personnel with the demonstrated technical capability to safely accomplish the Departments missions and responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities. Canceled by DOE M 426.1-1A. Does not cancel other directives.

2000-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

222

About Technical Assistance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

As technologies proceed along the development pipeline, most face major hurdles as they attempt to enter commercial markets. Our Technical Assistance program helps lower a range of institutional barriers to prepare innovative, energy-efficient technologies and energy management systems for full commercial deployment. These projects and activities address barriers that are not technical, Technology Readiness Level 9.

223

Depleted Uranium Technical Brief  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological healthDepleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air

224

Federal Technical Capability  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To define requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Chg. 1 dated 9-20-11 Cancels DOE O 426.1. Cancels DOE P 426.1.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

225

Technical College Buildings  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... should have such a paucity of literature dealing with material needs in the matter of buildings and equipment necessary for its field of activity. Books dealing with laboratories can be ... is therefore to be specially welcomed, particularly at the present time when the demands for buildings for technical education are so marked (London: Association of Technical Institutions and the Association ...

1935-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

226

Monitoring well plugging and abandonment plan, Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (revised)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Plugging and abandonment (P&A) of defunct groundwater monitoring wells is a primary element of the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Groundwater Protection Program (GWPP) (AJA Technical Services, Inc. 1996). This document is the revised groundwater monitoring well P&A plan for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Y-12 Plant located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This plan describes the systematic approach employed by Y-12 Plant GWPP to identify wells that require P&A, the technical methods employed to perform P&A activities, and administrative requirements. Original documentation for Y-12 Plant GWPP groundwater monitoring well P&A was provided in HSW, Inc. (1991). The original revision of the plan specified that a comprehensive monitoring well P&A was provided in HSW, Inc. (1991). The original revision of the plan specified that a comprehensive monitoring well P&A schedule be maintained. Wells are added to this list by issuance of both a P&A request and a P&A addendum to the schedule. The current Updated Subsurface Data Base includes a single mechanism to track the status of monitoring wells. In addition, rapid growth of the groundwater monitoring network and new regulatory requirements have resulted in constant changes to the status of wells. As a result, a streamlined mechanism to identify and track monitoring wells scheduled for P&A has been developed and the plan revised to formalize the new business practices.

NONE

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Safety and Technical Services  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety and Technical Services Safety and Technical Services Minimize The Safety and Technical Services (STS) organization is a component of the Office of Science's (SC's) Oak Ridge Integrated Support Center. The mission of STS is to provide excellent environmental, safety, health, quality, and engineering support to SC laboratories and other U.S. Department of Energy program offices. STS maintains a full range of technically qualified Subject Matter Experts, all of whom are associated with the Technical Qualifications Program. Examples of the services that we provide include: Integrated Safety Management Quality Assurance Planning and Metrics Document Review Tracking and trending analysis and reporting Assessments, Reviews, Surveillances and Inspections Safety Basis Support SharePoint/Dashboard Development for Safety Programs

228

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford site. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with requirements of 10 CFR 835, the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program, the DOE Richland Operations Office, DOE Office of River Protection, DOE Pacific Northwest Office of Science, and Hanford’s DOE contractors. The dosimetry system is operated by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Hanford External Dosimetry Program which provides dosimetry services to PNNL and all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since its inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving significant changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Maintenance and distribution of controlled hard copies of the manual by PNNL was discontinued beginning with Revision 0.2.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2011-04-04T23:59:59.000Z

229

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford site. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with requirements of 10 CFR 835, the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program, the DOE Richland Operations Office, DOE Office of River Protection, DOE Pacific Northwest Office of Science, and Hanford’s DOE contractors. The dosimetry system is operated by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Hanford External Dosimetry Program which provides dosimetry services to PNNL and all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since its inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving significant changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Maintenance and distribution of controlled hard copies of the manual by PNNL was discontinued beginning with Revision 0.2.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Renewable Energy Interconnection and Storage - Technical Aspects | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Renewable Energy Interconnection and Storage - Technical Aspects Renewable Energy Interconnection and Storage - Technical Aspects Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Spain Installed Wind Capacity Website Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Market Analysis Website: www.gwec.net/index.php?id=131 Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/spain-installed-wind-capacity-website Language: English Policies: Regulations Regulations: Feed-in Tariffs This website presents an overview of total installed wind energy capacity in Spain per year from 2000 to 2010. The page also presents the main market developments from 2010; a policy summary; a discussion of the revision in feed-in tariffs in 2010; and a future market outlook. References Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Renewable_Energy_Interconnection_and_Storage_-_Technical_Aspects&oldid=514543"

231

FINAL YEAR PROJECT TECHNICAL PAPER PAGE 2222 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Interface". · WWW is the abbreviation of "World Wide Web". · RCS is the abbreviation of "Revision Control THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG 1. INTRODUCTION This document is the final year project technical paper produced " own achievement. In this document, the system developed by the team will not be described in details

Cheng, Reynold Cheng Chun

232

RPP-RPT-42583 Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

RPP-RPT-42583 RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published October 2009 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 ~. washington river ~ protectionso/utions P.O. Box 850 Richland, Washington Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK

233

Technical Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Combined Heat & Power Deployment Technical Reports Technical Reports A wide range of resources addressing the many benefits of combined heat and power (CHP) is available,...

234

Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 July 29, 2004 Fiscal Year 2004, Annual Report to the Office of Management and Budget, Standards use and Participation The Department of Energy (DOE) implements the federal guidance and requirements of OMB Circular A-119 (OMB A-119) and the statutory requirements of Public Law (PL) 104-113 (15 USC 272) regarding the use of voluntary consensus standards (VCSs) through specific Departmental directives (policies, orders, requirements, guides, and technical standards) and supporting programs and management systems. Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, Office of Management and Budget Report for FY-2012 -

235

Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 May 3, 2004 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan: GENII Gap Analysis The GENII software, for radiological dispersion and consequence analysis, is one of the codes designated for the toolbox. To determine the actions needed to bring the GENII code into compliance with the SQA qualification criteria, and develop an estimate of the resources required to perform the upgrade, the Implementation Plan has committed to sponsoring a code-specific gap analysis document. Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis More Documents & Publications Guidance on GENII computer code - July 6, 2004 Technical Standards, ALOHA-Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3

236

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2004 Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program Federal Technical Capability Program Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy for Fiscal Year 2004 2 Federal Technical Capability Program Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy for Fiscal Year 2004 Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to ensuring that employees are trained and technically capable of performing their duties. In pursuit of this objective, the Secretary of Energy issued DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Policy for Defense Nuclear Facilities, to institutionalize the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). This program specifically applies to those offices and organizations performing functions related to the safe operation of defense nuclear facilities, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

237

A statistical review of the oxygen data from the gas generation tests supporting the revision of the 9975 SARP  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Chemical and Hydrogen Technology Section (CHT) of the Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC) has conducted a series of gas generation tests in support of the revision of the safety analysis report for packaging (SARP) for the 9975 container, developed at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The Packaging and Transportation Group of SRTC is coordinating the revision to this SARP. A Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan directing this work was issued by CHT in February 1999. Initially, the primary interest in this testing was hydrogen generation. From these ``gas generation tests can be tracked in real-time by measuring the pressure of a sealed container of the materials being studied. Because multiple gas phase reactions are produced in the radiation field of the sample, material pressure measurements do not necessarily define the quantity of H{sub 2} generated. However, the change in total molecules of gas can be calculated using the ideal gas law from the pressure measurement, known container volume and sample temperature. A measurement of the actual headspace gases must be completed to calculate the H{sub 2} generation rate for a particular sample.'' As the results from these tests were reviewed, however, questions arose regarding the oxygen in the headspace gases. Specifically, do the data from some tests indicate that oxygen was generated for those tests? And do the data for other tests indicate that the oxygen was depleted for them? A statistical analysis of the oxygen data derived from these tests is provided in this report to help answer these questions.

Edwards, T.B.

2000-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

238

Technical Publications by System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Technical Publications include Sourcebooks, Handbooks, Market Assessments, and other technical documents. Sourcebooks give the detailed technical information necessary for comprehensive understanding of energy system components, including how to analyze facility needs, optimize performance, and identify and implement energy efficiency and productivity improvements. Handbooks provide the detailed information necessary to assess and squeeze the greatest efficiency out of industrial systems. They provide hands-on advice for engineers and equipment operators. Market assessments describe the state of the market for industrial systems, components, and energy efficiency services; customer awareness of and desire for efficient systems; and the potential market for more efficient technology.

239

Specific Viscosity  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

n Equal to the relative viscosity of the same solution minus one. It represents the increase in viscosity that may be contributed by the polymeric solute. The specific viscosity, ?sp is defined by th...

Jan W. Gooch

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Policy Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and othercollaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts. ADR Revised Policy More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Building America Standing Technical Committee - Water Heating  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Water Heating Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan, v2012a Revised: January 2012 Committee Chair: 2011, 2012 Marc Hoeschele mhoesch@davisenergy.com 530-753-1100 x23 ARBI Page 2 Background on Residential Water Heating According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's 2005 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS), annual residential water heating totals 2.11 quads of energy annually, or 20% of the energy delivered to residential buildings 1 . Over the past 70 years, gas and electric storage water heaters have been the predominant water heater type in the United States 2 . Recently, gas tankless water heaters have made inroads in market share with current industry projected gas tankless sales estimated at 400,000+ annually, and an

242

External Technical Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

External Technical Review Report External Technical Review Report March 2010 U U . . S S . . D D e e p p a a r r t t m m e e n n t t o o f f E E n n e e r r g g y y O O f f f f i i c c e e o o f f E E n n v v i i r r o o n n m m e e n n t t a a l l M M a a n n a a g g e e m m e e n n t t External Technical Review (ETR) Process Guide September 2008 U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management September 2008 External Technical Review Process Guide Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose of Process ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background .........................................................................................................................

243

Technical Reports & Briefs  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This page contains links to technical reports and briefs published by the U.S. Department of Energy, plus information on current studies under way. These reports are intended to present objective...

244

Technical Standards Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes the DOE Technical Standards Program. Cancels DOE O 252.1 and DOE G 252.1-1. Admin Chg 1, dated 3-12-13 cancels DOE O 252.1A.

2011-02-23T23:59:59.000Z

245

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

ehss908241 Approved DOE Technical Standards en DOE-STD-3009-2014 http:energy.govehssdownloadsdoe-std-3009-2014

246

Technical Planning Basis  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Guide assists DOE/NNSA field elements and operating contractors in identifying and analyzing hazards at facilities and sites to provide the technical planning basis for emergency management programs. Cancels DOE G 151.1-1, Volume 2.

2007-07-11T23:59:59.000Z

247

Technical Report Technologically Enhanced  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.......................................................................................1-6 Geology and Distribution of Uranium................................................ ..........1Technical Report on Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials from Uranium of Mines and Geology, and William Chenoweth. EPA is especially appreciative of the comments provided

248

Technical Standards, Style Guide- August 1, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Style Guide for the Preparation of DOE Technical Standards (Standards, Handbooks, and Technical Standards Lists)

249

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 1, 2009 July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs), also referred to as non-Government standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications

250

Report: Technical Uncertainty and Risk Reduction  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY AND RISK REDUCTION TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY AND RISK REDUCTION Background In FY 2007 EMAB was tasked to assess EM's ability to reduce risk and technical uncertainty. Board members explored this topic throughout the year as a component of their focus on the previously discussed topic of Discretionary Budgeting. Discussion Understanding the risks and variability associated with EM's projects is a challenging task that has the potential to significantly impact the program's established baselines. According to budget personnel, EM has established a database of baseline variables and possibilities; however, this tool is project-specific and does not apply to the greater complex. The Board believes that EM could benefit from incorporating an additional and more comprehensive data point into the baseline development process that budgets

251

DOE Technical Standards Program: Topical Committees  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Topical Committee Topical Committee Office of Nuclear Safety Internet Linkage for TSP Topical Committees In the interest of optimum technology transfer, the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) has set up a network of topical committees. These committees provide a forum for communication across the DOE complex on technical standards related activities. If you would like information about a specific topical committee, or wish to join one of the groups, we've provided a roster of TSP Topical Committees and corresponding Topical Committee Chairpersons. Expectations of DOE Topical Committees The March 9, 1998 memorandum (provided here in web page format) from Rick Serbu, Technical Standards Program (TSP) Manager, EH-31, to J. Robert Wayland, Metrology Topical Committee Secretary, Sandia National Laboratories, discusses general TSP expectations of DOE topical standards committees. This memorandum should be reviewed by all DOE/contractor personnel involved in topical committee activities.

252

NOxControl revised.p65  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

OCTOBER 2001 OCTOBER 2001 DOE/FE-0442 EVALUATION OF GAS REBURNING AND LOW-NO X BURNERS ON A WALL-FIRED BOILER ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATION Disclaimer This report was prepared using publicly available information, including the Final Technical Report and other reports prepared pursuant to a cooperative agreement partially funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. Neither the United States Government nor any agency, employee, contractor, or representative thereof, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial

253

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Photo courtesy of Dennis Schroeder, NREL 18022 Photo courtesy of Dennis Schroeder, NREL 18022 The U.S. Department of Energy offers technical assistance supporting energy efficiency and renewable energy. This technical assistance can include direct advice on issues or goals, tools and maps, and training. Some select technical assistance offerings are listed below. For States and Communities The State and Local Solution Center provides states and communities with resources addressing strategic energy planning, policy, financing, data management, and technologies to help them implement successful energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. The Weatherization Assistance Program Technical Assistance Center provides

254

Hanford Technical Basis for Multiple Dosimetry Effective Dose Methodology  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The current method at Hanford for dealing with the results from multiple dosimeters worn during non-uniform irradiation is to use a compartmentalization method to calculate the effective dose (E). The method, as documented in the current version of Section 6.9.3 in the 'Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual, PNL-MA-842,' is based on the compartmentalization method presented in the 1997 ANSI/HPS N13.41 standard, 'Criteria for Performing Multiple Dosimetry.' With the adoption of the ICRP 60 methodology in the 2007 revision to 10 CFR 835 came changes that have a direct affect on the compartmentalization method described in the 1997 ANSI/HPS N13.41 standard, and, thus, to the method used at Hanford. The ANSI/HPS N13.41 standard committee is in the process of updating the standard, but the changes to the standard have not yet been approved. And, the drafts of the revision of the standard tend to align more with ICRP 60 than with the changes specified in the 2007 revision to 10 CFR 835. Therefore, a revised method for calculating effective dose from non-uniform external irradiation using a compartmental method was developed using the tissue weighting factors and remainder organs specified in 10 CFR 835 (2007).

Hill, Robin L.; Rathbone, Bruce A.

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

Implementation of Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on July 27, 2001 approved Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report (SAR) and the associated TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods for Payload Control (TRAMPAC). Key initiatives in Revision 19 included matrix depletion, unlimited mixing of shipping categories, a flammability assessment methodology, and an alternative methodology for the determination of flammable gas generation rates. All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites shipping transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) were required to implement Revision 19 methodology into their characterization and waste transportation programs by May 20, 2002. An implementation process was demonstrated by the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in Golden, Colorado. The three-part process used by RFETS included revision of the site-specific TRAMPAC, an evaluation of the contact-handled TRU waste inventory against the regulations in Revision 19, and design and development of software to facilitate future inventory analyses.

D'Amico, E.; O'Leary, J.; Bell, S.; Djordjevic, S.; Givens, C,; Shokes, T.; Thompson, S.; Stahl, S.

2003-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

256

EIS-0286: Notice of Revised Scope | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice of Revised Scope EIS-0286: Notice of Revised Scope Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to revise the...

257

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS LEON M. GOLDSTEIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Opening: 50' x 30' Grid Height: 90' Plaster Line to upstage wall: 50' Plaster Line to edge of apron: Pit teaser) Length of battens: 60' House Curtain color: Blue, guillotine CYC: W hite CYC from plaster line 36

Rosen, Jay

258

SPECIFICATIONS OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM DEDICATED TO A REORGANIZABLE AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Form of Production of Microproduct" (PFPM) on which are laid out of the "trade stations", specialized stations

Boyer, Edmond

259

DRAFT NISTIR 7628 Revision 1 Guidelines for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT NISTIR 7628 Revision 1 Guidelines for Smart Grid Cyber Security: Vol. 3, Supportive Analyses Revision 1 Guidelines for Smart Grid Cyber Security: Vol. 3, Supportive Analyses and References The Smart as technology advances and as threats to grid security inevitably multiply and diversif

260

REVISED HYDROGEN SULFIDE DRILLING CONTINGENCY PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

REVISED HYDROGEN SULFIDE DRILLING CONTINGENCY PLAN OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY;PREFACE Attached is the "REVISED HYDROGEN SULFIDE DRILLING CONTINGENCY PLAN" that will be used for ODP coring and drilling operations on legs where hydrogen sulfide is likely to be encountered. Prior

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

262

Archived Weekly Files, Revised, 1984 Forward EIA revises its first-round  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Archive weekly and monthly coal production -- revised and original estimates About coal production revision estimates EIA revises its weekly (and monthly) original estimates of state-level coal production using quarterly mine-level coal production data from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) as soon as the data are available. This method guarantees that EIAÂ’s revised coal production estimates for each past quarter conform with the MSHA survey data. The state level revised estimates include refuse coal. EIA uses this equation to revise its weekly coal production estimates: Revised weekly estimate (State A) = original EIA estimate (State A) x MSHA quarterly data (State A) Ă·

263

Derived Concentration Technical Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

196-2011 196-2011 April 2011 DOE STANDARD DERIVED CONCENTRATION TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy AREA ENVR Washington, D.C. 20585 Not Measurement Sensitive This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/standard/standard.html DOE-STD-1196-2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Derived Concentration Technical Standard was a collaborative effort sponsored by the DOE Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance, with support from Department subject matter experts (SMEs) in the field of radiation protection. This standard, which complements DOE Order (O) 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, was developed taking

264

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES AT THE BUILDING 812 OPERABLE UNIT, LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE 300  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy Livermore Site Office requested a technical review of remedial alternatives proposed for the Building 812 Operable Unit, Site 300 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The team visited the site and reviewed the alternatives proposed for soil remediation in the draft RI/FS and made the following observations and recommendations. Based on the current information available for the site, the team did not identify a single technology that would be cost effective and/or ecologically sound to remediate DU contamination at Building 812 to current remedial goals. Soil washing is not a viable alternative and should not be considered at the site unless final remediation levels can be negotiated to significantly higher levels. This recommendation is based on the results of soil washing treatability studies at Fernald and Ashtabula that suggest that the technology would only be effective to address final remediation levels higher than 50 pCi/g. The technical review team identified four areas of technical uncertainty that should be resolved before the final selection of a preferred remedial strategy is made. Areas of significant technical uncertainty that should be addressed include: (1) Better delineation of the spatial distribution of surface contamination and the vertical distribution of subsurface contamination in the area of the firing table and associated alluvial deposits; (2) Chemical and physical characterization of residual depleted uranium (DU) at the site; (3) Determination of actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates to support risk modeling; and (4) More realistic estimation of cost for remedial alternatives, including soil washing, that were derived primarily from vendor estimates. Instead of conducting the planned soil washing treatability study, the team recommends that the site consider a new phased approach that combines additional characterization approaches and technologies to address the technical uncertainty in the remedial decision making. The site should redo the risk calculations as the future use scenario has changed for the site. As a result, the existing model is based on very conservative assumptions that result in calculation of unreasonably low cleanup goals. Specifically, the review team proposes that LLNL consider: (1) Revising the industrial worker scenario to a reasonable maximum exposure (RME) for a site worker that performs a weekly walk down of the area for two hours for 25 years (or an alternative RME if the exposure scenario changes); (2) Revising the ESSI of 2 mg U per kg soil for the deer mouse to account for less than 0.05 of the total ingested uranium being adsorbed by the gut; (3) Revising bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) for vegetation and invertebrates that are based on 100 mg of soluble uranium per kg of soil, as the uranium concentration in the slope soil does not average 100 mg/kg and it is not all in a soluble form; and (4) Measuring actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates at the site and using the actual values to support risk calculations. The team recommends that the site continue a phased approach during remediation. The activities should focus on elimination of the principal threats to groundwater by excavating (1) source material from the firing table and alluvial deposits, and (2) soil hotspots from the surrounding slopes with concentrations of U-235 and U-238 that pose unacceptable risk. This phased approach allows the remediation path to be driven by the results of each phase. This reduces the possibility of costly 'surprises', such as failure of soil treatment, and reduces the impact of remediation on endangered habitat. Treatment of the excavated material with physical separation equipment may result in a decreased volume of soil for disposal if the DU is concentrated in the fine-grained fraction, which can then be disposed of in an offsite facility at a considerable cost savings. Based on existing data and a decision to implement the recommended phased approach, the cost of characterization, excavation and physical

Eddy-Dilek, C.; Miles, D.; Abitz, R.

2009-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

265

Revised Davis-Bacon Wage Determinations for the Weatherization...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Davis-Bacon Wage Determinations for the Weatherization Assistance Program Revised Davis-Bacon Wage Determinations for the Weatherization Assistance Program U.S. Department...

266

PG&E Reconductoring Project Biological Assessment (Revised) ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PG&E Reconductoring Project Biological Assessment (Revised) PG&E Reconductoring Project Biological Assessment (Revised) PG&E Reconductoring Project Biological Assessment (1216...

267

Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change in NEPA Reviews Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and...

268

CEQ Issues Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews CEQ Issues Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of...

269

Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text Attachment 2: Solicitation for Offers with New and Revised Green Lease Text Solicitation for Offers Paragraphs with...

270

Audit/Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) AuditInvestigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) This schedule covers records associated with investigations other than those performed...

271

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en DOE-STD-1150-2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1150-2013 DOE-STD-1150-2013

272

DOE Technical Assistance Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Collection of Customer Data for Better Buildings Guidelines For Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utility Keith Freischlag and Curtis Framel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project DOE Technical Assistance Program Team 4 - Program & Project Development & Implementation December 16, 2010 Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Webinar Overview * Technical Assistance Program (TAP) * Discussion of Identifying Utility Stakeholders * Discussion of Procuring Customer Usage Data * Suggestions to Streamline Data Collection Processes * Overview of Data Reporting Requirements * Q&A Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities * Questions and discussion after presentation

273

Proposed Revision of the Decay Heat Standard ANSI/ANS-5.1-2005  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The ANSI/ANS-5.1 [1] standard on decay heat in light water reactors is one of the most widely used standards for reactor design and safety analysis. The standard was last revised and issued in 2005. The 2005 revision included several important accomplishments, including incorporation of ENDF/B-VI nuclear data in the development of correction factors implemented in the standard, and revisions to the 'simplified method.' The status of the 2005 ANS-5.1 standard has been summarized previously [2]. Future revisions of the standard under consideration, as proposed by the working group, were to (a) improve the neutron capture effect specification, (b) include contributions from actinides not already addressed by the standard, and (c) specify values for the total recoverable decay energy Q for major fissionable elements. These items are carried over from recommendations by Dickens et al. [3] during development of the 1994 revision. The current working group has also identified the representation of decay heat uncertainties as an area for improvement. This paper discusses recent development activities to further improve and extend the utility of the ANS-5.1 decay heat standard. These developments are in progress, and this paper summarizes the status of the activities. The proposed revisions discussed in this paper are being considered by the working group for adoption in the next publication of the standard.

Gauld, Ian C [ORNL] [ORNL; Rapp, Michelle Brady [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)] [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL); Schmittroth, F. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Retired)] [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Retired); Wilson, W. [Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)] [Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Security Policy Specification Using a Graphical Approach Page 1 Security Policy Specification Using a Graphical  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Security Policy Specification Using a Graphical Approach Page 1 Security Policy Specification Using of California, Davis {hoagland,pandey,levitt}@cs.ucdavis.edu Technical Report CSE-98-3 A security policy states for organizations to declare their security policies, even informal state- ments would be better than the current

California at Davis, University of

275

Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant technical manual  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A key element of the Hanford waste management strategy is the construction of a new facility, the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP), to vitrify existing and future liquid high-level waste produced by defense activities at the Hanford Site. The HWVP mission is to vitrify pretreated waste in borosilicate glass, cast the glass into stainless steel canisters, and store the canisters at the Hanford Site until they are shipped to a federal geological repository. The HWVP Technical Manual (Manual) documents the technical bases of the current HWVP process and provides a physical description of the related equipment and the plant. The immediate purpose of the document is to provide the technical bases for preparation of project baseline documents that will be used to direct the Title 1 and Title 2 design by the A/E, Fluor. The content of the Manual is organized in the following manner. Chapter 1.0 contains the background and context within which the HWVP was designed. Chapter 2.0 describes the site, plant, equipment and supporting services and provides the context for application of the process information in the Manual. Chapter 3.0 provides plant feed and product requirements, which are primary process bases for plant operation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes the technology for each plant process. Chapter 5.0 describes the engineering principles for designing major types of HWVP equipment. Chapter 6.0 describes the general safety aspects of the plant and process to assist in safe and prudent facility operation. Chapter 7.0 includes a description of the waste form qualification program and data. Chapter 8.0 indicates the current status of quality assurance requirements for the Manual. The Appendices provide data that are too extensive to be placed in the main text, such as extensive tables and sets of figures. The Manual is a revision of the 1987 version.

Larson, D.E. [ed.; Watrous, R.A.; Kruger, O.L. [and others

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance The Technical Assistance program is managed through the Center for Sustainable Soil and Groundwater Solutions at SRNL. The Technical Assistance program provides teams of nationally recognized experts from across the complex to support both DOE's smaller sites, such as Paducah, Portsmouth, Pinellas, Ashtabula, Fernald, Mound and Kansas City Plant, and larger sites such as Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Savannah River. Solutions that reduce technical risk and uncertainty Focus on science and engineering issues and strategic implementation of remedial systems Independent reviews facilitate regulatory and stakeholder acceptance of solutions. Contacts Karen Skubal karen.skubal@em.doe.gov (301) 903-6524 Justin Marble

277

Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Work |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Work Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Work February 17, 2006 - 11:59am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) today released a report confirming the technical soundness of infiltration modeling work performed by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) employees. "The report makes clear that the technical basis developed by the USGS has a strong conceptual foundation and is corroborated by independently-derived scientific conclusions, and provides a solid underpinning for the 2002 site recommendation," said OCRWM's Acting Director Paul Golan. "We are committed to opening Yucca Mountain based only on sound science. The work

278

TECHNICAL RISK RATING OF DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS - 9153  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) was established to achieve the safe and compliant disposition of legacy wastes and facilities from defense nuclear applications. The scope of work is diverse, with projects ranging from single acquisitions to collections of projects and operations that span several decades and costs from hundreds of millions to billions US$. The need to be able to manage and understand the technical risks from the project to senior management level has been recognized as an enabler to successfully completing the mission. In 2008, DOE-EM developed the Technical Risk Rating as a new method to assist in managing technical risk based on specific criteria. The Technical Risk Rating, and the criteria used to determine the rating, provides a mechanism to foster open, meaningful communication between the Federal Project Directors and DOE-EM management concerning project technical risks. Four indicators (technical maturity, risk urgency, handling difficulty and resolution path) are used to focus attention on the issues and key aspects related to the risks. Pressing risk issues are brought to the forefront, keeping DOE-EM management informed and engaged such that they fully understand risk impact. Use of the Technical Risk Rating and criteria during reviews provides the Federal Project Directors the opportunity to openly discuss the most significant risks and assists in the management of technical risks across the portfolio of DOE-EM projects. Technical Risk Ratings can be applied to all projects in government and private industry. This paper will present the methodology and criteria for Technical Risk Ratings, and provide specific examples from DOE-EM projects.

Cercy, M; Ronald Fayfich, R; Steven P Schneider, S

2008-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

279

CHP Technical Assistance Partnerships (CHP TAPs) | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Combined Heat & Power Deployment CHP Technical Assistance Partnerships (CHP TAPs) CHP Technical Assistance Partnerships (CHP TAPs) DOE's CHP Technical Assistance Partnerships...

280

Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-2-2013, Initiating DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-7-2013, Maintaining DOE Technical Standards Technical Standards Newsletter - March 2014...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Technical Information Network  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE's Technical Information Network for Solid-State Lighting (TINSSL) increases awareness of SSL technology, performance, and appropriate applications. TINSSL members include representatives from regional energy efficiency organizations and program sponsors, utilities, state and local energy offices, lighting trade groups, and other stakeholders.

282

Technical Potential for Local Distributed  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the impact of high penetrations of solar PV on wholesale power markets (energy and capacity Technical Potential for Local Distributed Photovoltaics in California Preliminary.391.5100 www.ethree.com Technical Potential for Local Distributed Photovoltaics in California Preliminary

283

VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS 1 Vehicle Features Base Vehicle: 2011 Chevrolet Volt VIN: 1G1RD6E48BUI00815 Class: Compact Seatbelt Positions: 4 Type 2 : Multi-Mode PHEV (EV, Series, and Power-split) Motor Type: 12-pole permanent magnet AC synchronous Max. Power/Torque: 111 kW/370 Nm Max. Motor Speed: 9500 rpm Cooling: Active - Liquid cooled Generator Type: 16-pole permanent magnet AC synchronous Max. Power/Torque: 55 kW/200 Nm Max. Generator Speed: 6000 rpm Cooling: Active - Liquid cooled Battery Manufacturer: LG Chem Type: Lithium-ion Cathode/Anode Material: LiMn 2 O 4 /Hard Carbon Number of Cells: 288 Cell Config.: 3 parallel, 96 series Nominal Cell Voltage: 3.7 V Nominal System Voltage: 355.2 V Rated Pack Capacity: 45 Ah Rated Pack Energy: 16 kWh Weight of Pack: 435 lb

284

VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 5 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS 1 Vehicle Features Base Vehicle: 2011 Nissan Leaf VIN: JN1AZ0CP5BT000356 Class: Mid-size Seatbelt Positions: 5 Type: EV Motor Type: Three-Phase, Four-Pole Permanent Magnet AC Synchronous Max. Power/Torque: 80 kW/280 Nm Max. Motor Speed: 10,390 rpm Cooling: Active - Liquid cooled Battery Manufacturer: Automotive Energy Supply Corporation Type: Lithium-ion - Laminate type Cathode/Anode Material: LiMn 2 O 4 with LiNiO 2 /Graphite Pack Location: Under center of vehicle Number of Cells: 192 Cell Configuration: 2 parallel, 96 series Nominal Cell Voltage: 3.8 V Nominal System Voltage: 364.8 V Rated Pack Capacity: 66.2 Ah Rated Pack Energy: 24 kWh Max. Cell Charge Voltage 2 : 4.2 V Min. Cell Discharge Voltage 2 : 2.5 V

285

WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study: June 2000--June 2002 (Revised)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WindPACT Turbine Rotor WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study June 2000 - June 2002 D.J. Malcolm Global Energy Concepts, LLC Kirkland, Washington A.C. Hansen Windward Engineering Salt Lake City, Utah Subcontract Report NREL/SR-500-32495 Revised April 2006 WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study June 2000 - June 2002 D.J. Malcolm Global Energy Concepts, LLC Kirkland, Washington A.C. Hansen Windward Engineering Salt Lake City, Utah NREL Technical Monitor: A. Laxson Prepared under Subcontract No. YAT-0-30213-01 Subcontract Report NREL/SR-500-32495 Revised April 2006 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle

286

Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners (Revised)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

23 23 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-46723 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory

287

May 22, 2013, FTCP Face to Face Meeting Presentation - Status of FAQS Revision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FAQS FAQS Revision FTCP Meeting May 22, 2013 Jeanette Yarrington Instrumentation and Control NA-SH-50/David Lawson Ike White FAQ was sent out to FTCP Agents/CTA for post REVCOM review. Transportation and Traffic Mgmt No current sponsor Ike White Has been recent discussion on whether to cancel. Waste Management EM HQ/Christine Gelles Todd Lapointe Reviewed in 04/2010; no update needed but JTA needed. Technical Program Manager Need sponsor? Ike White JTA completed. Needs to be assigned to a sponsor. Aviation Manager and Safety Officer MA-30/Ferrin Moore Pat Worthington JTAs completed but FAQs need to be reviewed. Deactivation and Decommissioning EM-13/George Cava Todd Lapointe Need status update on FAQ revision. Electrical Systems and Oversight

288

Specific binding of gibberellic acid by Cytokinin-Specific Binding Proteins: a new aspect of plant hormone-binding proteins with the PR-10 fold  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Two plant cytokinin-specific binding proteins were crystallized in complex with gibberellic acid (GA3), which is an entirely different plant hormone. The crystal structures, determined at high resolution, reveal a highly specific mode of GA3 binding, calling for a revision of the hormone specificity of plant proteins with the PR-10 fold.

Ruszkowski, M.

2014-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

289

Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The Department of Energy is hosting a Technical Exchange at the Hanford Site on The Department of Energy is hosting a Technical Exchange at the Hanford Site on April 13-14, 2010. The Performance Assessment Community of Practice has been chartered to advise the Office of Environmental Management Tank Waste Corporate Board regarding performance assessments and performance assessment-like analyses, promote consistency in the preparation of performance assessments across the Department of Energy (DOE) complex, foster exchange of information among performance assessment practitioners, and develop appropriate guidance for performance assessments such that they are based on sound science and are defensible. The purpose of this technical exchange is to provide a venue for performance assessment and risk assessment practitioners, managers and regulators, and contributors to the Cementitious Barriers Partnership and Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management project to share plans and experiences and share ideas for future performance assessment and risk assessment modeling. The technical exchange will include a combination of plenary presentations and discussions with breakout sessions for specific topics. Discussions will emphasize areas for improved consistency and solicit suggestions for future developments related to modeling tools. A breakout discussion session is also planned to address: DOE Order 435.1 Update, regulatory challenges for performance and risk assessment modeling, and other topical areas. Arrangements have also been made for a GoldSim modeling roundtable at the conclusion of the workshop for participants who are interested in sharing experiences related to the use of GoldSim for their simulations.

290

Laboratory-Specific-Documentation-HHN.docx CHP updated 8/21/13 Virginia Tech  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Laboratory-Specific-Documentation-HHN.docx CHP updated 8/21/13 Virginia Tech Chemistry Department Chemical Hygiene Plan This CHP applies to rooms Current worker beginning a new task Reviewing a revised edition of the CHP 1

Crawford, T. Daniel

291

Requesting a Revision to PUB-3000  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual The following procedure describes the process for making changes to Berkeley Lab's ES&H Manual (PUB-3000). It identifies Responsible Authors who participate in the revision process. A request to revise the ES&H Manual may be initiated by any Berkeley Lab employee; however, all requests must be sent to the Responsible Author and approved by the ES&H Manual Manager, Mike Wisherop. If you wish to request a change to a PUB-3000 chapter, follow these steps: Contact the Responsible Author for the chapter in need of revision. Submit PUB-3000 revisions to the Responsible Author and the ES&H Manual Manager. Direct all questions or comments concerning ES&H Manual content to the ES&H Manual Manager.

292

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

293

High Level Waste System Plan Revision 9  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Revision 9 of the High Level Waste System Plan documents the current operating strategy of the HLW System at SRS to receive, store, treat, and dispose of high-level waste.

Davis, N.R.; Wells, M.N.; Choi, A.S.; Paul, P.; Wise, F.E.

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

Revised June 2014 Training Management System (TMS)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised June 2014 Training Management System (TMS) User Manual Contents Accessing the TMS.................................................................................................................15 #12;2 Accessing the TMS Before accessing the Training Management System you must know your Harvard...........................................................................................................................................2 Training Director, Training Manager, and Course Director Access

Heller, Eric

295

Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

296

Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

297

Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

298

Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

299

Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

300

Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

302

Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

303

Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

304

Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

305

New and revised standards for coke production  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The need for new and revised standards for coke production in Ukraine and Russia is outlined. Such standards should address improvements in plant operation, working conditions, environmental protection, energy conservation, fire and explosion safety, and economic indices.

G.A. Kotsyuba; M.I. Alpatov; Y.G. Shapoval [Giprokoks, the State Institute for the Design of Coke-Industry Enterprises, Kharkov (Ukraine)

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

306

EM Quality Assurance Policy, Revision 0  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Previous EM policy on the use of the corporate Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Rev. 0). This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the policy, but is still in use at some EM sites.

307

Federal Technical Capability Program - Quarterly Performance Indicator  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 16, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability June 5, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 20, 2013 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 20, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 8, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 30, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability March 6, 2012 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 10, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 24, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 18, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 23, 2011

308

Federal Technical Capability Program Operational Plan - FY 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

i i * D D e e c c e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 Revised: February 2012 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability P rogram FY 2012 Operational P lan December 2011 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are:

309

Federal Technical Capability Program Operational Plan - FY 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

* D D e e c c e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 Revised: February 2012 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability P rogram FY 2012 Operational P lan December 2011 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are:

310

Energy Department Announces Technical Assistance Opportunity...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Announces Technical Assistance Opportunity for Tribal Clean Energy Deployment Energy Department Announces Technical Assistance Opportunity for Tribal Clean Energy Deployment...

311

HLW system plan - revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The projected ability of the Tank Farm to support DWPF startup and continued operation has diminished somewhat since revision 1 of this Plan. The 13 month delay in DWPF startup, which actually helps the Tank Farm condition in the near term, was more than offset by the 9 month delay in ITP startup, the delay in the Evaporator startups and the reduction to Waste Removal funding. This Plan does, however, describe a viable operating strategy for the success of the HLW System and Mission, albeit with less contingency and operating flexibility than in the past. HLWM has focused resources from within the division on five near term programs: The three evaporator restarts, DWPF melter heatup and completion of the ITP outage. The 1H Evaporator was restarted 12/28/93 after a 9 month shutdown for an extensive Conduct of Operations upgrade. The 2F and 2H Evaporators are scheduled to restart 3/94 and 4/94, respectively. The RHLWE startup remains 11/17/97.

Not Available

1994-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

312

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance The DOE Office of Indian Energy and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Tribal Energy Program provide federally recognized Indian Tribes, bands, nations, tribal energy resource development organizations, and other organized groups and communities-including Alaska Native villages or regional and village corporations-with technical assistance designed to advance renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. Technical assistance is typically limited to 40 hours and may include, but is not limited to, the following priority areas: Strategic energy planning Grantee support Transmission/interconnection Project development Finance Lease agreements DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Sandia National

313

Technical Highlights - FEERC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Highlights for November 2013 Technical Highlights for November 2013 The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) cited in Article Published in Inside Science ORNL's recent achievement in ionic liquid (IL) additives for engine lubrication is featured in an article "Molten Salts Could Improve Fuel Economy," published in Inside Science, http://www.insidescience.org/content/molten-salts-could-improve-fuel-economy/1492. The article is syndicated to subscribers at FOXnews.com, NBCnews.com, LiveScience, and others. Dual-Fuel Combustion with Additives Capability A new capability was added to the multi-cylinder advanced combustion research engine at ORNL allowing dual fuel combustion with gasoline and gasoline doped with additives to increase the reactivity. The new configuration allows precise control over fuel temperature to allow for

314

Spring 2009 Technical Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Spring 2009 Technical Workshop Spring 2009 Technical Workshop in Support of U.S. Department of Energy 2009 Congestion Study Webcast, transcript, and presentations available at: http://www.congestion09.anl.gov/ Crowne Plaza Chicago O'Hare Hotel & Conference Center March 25-26, 2009 Agenda Day 1 - Wednesday, March 25, 2009 9:00 a.m. Registration Check-In & Continental Breakfast 10:00 a.m. DOE Welcome/Purpose of Workshop David Meyer, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE-OE) 10:15 a.m. Session 1 - Historic Congestion in the Western Interconnection The Western Electric Coordinating Council Transmission Expansion Planning and Policy Committee has conducted an analysis of historic congestion in the Western

315

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

316

WHOLE FROG TECHNICAL REPORT  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WHOLE FROG TECHNICAL REPORT WHOLE FROG TECHNICAL REPORT WING NIP, CRAIG LOGAN Imaging and Distributed Computing Group Information and Computing Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 Publication number: LBL-35331 Credits CONTENT INTRODUCTION MRI DATA PHOTOGRAPH DATA (CRYOTOME) SEGMENTATION VISUALIZATION IN 3D PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED Photographing Lighting Misalignment Digitizing Lighting Segmentation Inconsistent Data Higher Resolution Desire IMPROVEMENT INTRODUCTION The goal of the Whole Frog Project is to be able to represent the anatomy of a frog in a computer in 3D space in such a way that a high school student will find it useful in learning physiology, hopefully developing a sense of interest in using computers at the same time. MRI DATA The original plan is to make use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to

317

RMOTC - Library - Technical Papers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Papers & Presentations Technical Papers & Presentations General presentations What is RMOTC? A general overview of RMOTC's capabilities and facilities including the production, drilling, energy assurance, produced water management, carbon management, enhanced oil recovery, and alternative energy programs. RMOTC's renewable partnerships Renewable projects past, present, and future RMOTC: America's premier field testing facility An overview of RMOTC's unique capabilities History Of Teapot Dome A look back at Teapot Dome's rich history Fossil & renewable energy partnership opportunities Exploring renewable energy use in the oil field GPS & GIS - Managing Spatial Data Risk associated with current practice in managing spatial data RMOTC White Papers Oil & gas reservoirs in U.S. like the producing formations at NPR-3

318

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The STI product is the Final Technical Report from ReliOn, Inc. for contract award DE-EE0000487: Recovery Act PEM Fuel Cell Systems Providing Emergency Reserve and Backup Power. The program covered the turnkey deployment of 431 ReliOn fuel cell systems at 189 individual sites for AT&T and PG&E with ReliOn functioning as the primary equipment supplier and the project manager. The Final Technical Report provides an executive level summary, a comparison of the actual accomplishments vs. the goals and objectives of the project, as well as a summary of the project activity from the contract award date of August 1, 2009 through the contract expiration date of December 31, 2011. Two photos are included in the body of the report which show hydrogen storage and bulk hydrogen refueling technologies developed as a result of this program.

Maxwell, Mike, J., P.E.

2012-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

319

Honda Transmission Technical Center  

High Performance Buildings Database

Russells Point, OH The Honda Transmission Technical Center is located on the Honda of America Manufacturing Plant facility site in Russells Point, Ohio. This facility is used for product engineering and market quality testing and analysis of automatic transmissions. The building contains a large workshop area for ten cars, a future dynamometer, two laboratories, an open office area, three conference rooms, a break room, restrooms, and related support areas.

320

Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To prescribe policies, responsibilities and authorities to establish Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM) Program. This order implements the DOE TSCM Procedural Guide, DOE TSCM Operations Manual, DOE TSCM Report Writing Guide and Threat Assessment Scheduling System (TASS) which contain classified policies and procedures concerning the DOE TSCM Program. Cancels DOE 5636.3A. Canceled by DOE O 471.2 dated 9-28-95.

1993-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE Policy 420.1 This document provides the technical basis for the Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 420.1, Nuclear Safety Policy, dated 2-8-2011. It includes an analysis of the revised Policy to determine whether it provides the necessary and sufficient high-level expectations that will lead DOE to establish and implement appropriate requirements to assure protection of the public, workers, and the environment from the hazards of DOE's operation of nuclear facilities. In developing the revised Policy and performing this analysis, DOE reviewed the current Nuclear Safety Policy (Secretary of Energy Notice [SEN] 35-91, Nuclear Safety Policy) and safety policies established by other safety

322

Technical issues related to NUREG 0800, Chapter 18: Human Factors Engineering/Standard Review Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The revision of Chapter 18 of NUREG 0800, Human Factors Engineering Standard Review Plan (SRP) will be based on SECY 82-111 and guidance contained in NUREG 0700, NUREG 0801 and NUREG 0835, plus other references. In conducting field reviews of control rooms, the NRC has identified technical issues which can be used to enhance the development of the revised version of NUREG 0800, and to establish priorities among the list of possible Branch Technical Positions (BTP) in NUREG 0800, Rev. 0, Table 18.0-2. This report is a compilation of comments and suggestions from the people who used NUREG 0700 in the Control Room field reviews. This information was used to establish possible BTP topic priorities so that the most important BTPs could be issued first. The comments and suggestions are included for HFEB review in conjunction with the table of priorities.

Savage, J.W.

1982-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

323

ACTIVITY SPECIFIC FIREARMS SAFETY PLAN FOR  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility/ Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility/ North Slope of Alaska/Adjacent Arctic Ocean (ACRF/NSA/AAO) Activity Specific Firearm Safety Plan for ACRF/North Slope of Alaska Sandia National Laboratories Department 6383, Energy, Climate & Atmospheric Management ACRF/NSA/AAO Revision 14 Activity Specific Firearm Safety Plan for June 2010 ACRF/North Slope of Alaska Signature Page This safety plan is approved by the undersigned and includes the firearm and ammunition storage practices described in this document. Mark D Ivey ACRF/NSA/AAO Site Manager _________________________________Date: ______ Mark D Ivey Department 06339 Manager _________________________________Date: _______ Michael L Heister SNL Safety Engineer _________________________________Date:________

324

1993 DOE technical standards managers workshop: Proceedings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This workshop is focused on the benefits of the DOE technical standards program, which is focused toward the preferred use of non-Government standards for DOE activities and the development of DOE technical standards when non-Government standards are not available or are inappropriate. One goal of the program is to replace redundant site-specific standards with more universally accepted documents that have been scrutinized by experts. This replacement is discussed at the workshop along with the problems encountered and solutions found. The workshop provided an opportunity for geographically dispersed people to meet and advance their standards knowledge and efforts to support the program. Safety issues have been the driving force behind the program to date. Several companies offer products and services that support the development, processing, and retrieval of standards. This document mostly comprise vugraphs.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

325

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE Policy 420.1  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document provides the technical basis for the Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 420.1, Nuclear Safety Policy, dated 2-8-2011. It includes an analysis of the revised Policy to determine whether it provides the necessary and sufficient high-level expectations that will lead DOE to establish and implement appropriate requirements to assure protection of the public, workers, and the environment from the hazards of DOE’s operation of nuclear facilities.

326

The mixed waste management facility. Project baseline revision 1.2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Revision 1.2 to the Project Baseline (PB) for the Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF) is in response to DOE directives and verbal guidance to (1) Collocate the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF) and MWMF into a single complex, integrate certain and overlapping functions as a cost-saving measure; (2) Meet certain fiscal year (FY) new-BA funding objectives ($15.3M in FY95) with lower and roughly balanced funding for out years; (3) Reduce Total Project Cost (TPC) for the MWMF Project; (4) Include costs for all appropriate permitting activities in the project TPC. This baseline revision also incorporates revisions in the technical baseline design for Molten Salt Oxidation (MSO) and Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation (MEO). Changes in the WBS dictionary that are necessary as a result of this rebaseline, as well as minor title changes, at WBS Level 3 or above (DOE control level) are approved as a separate document. For completeness, the WBS dictionary that reflects these changes is contained in Appendix B. The PB, with revisions as described in this document, were also the basis for the FY97 Validation Process, presented to DOE and their reviewers on March 21-22, 1995. Appendix C lists information related to prior revisions to the PB. Several key changes relate to the integration of functions and sharing of facilities between the portion of the DWTF that will house the MWMF and those portions that are used by the Hazardous Waste Management (HWM) Division at LLNL. This collocation has been directed by DOE as a cost-saving measure and has been implemented in a manner that maintains separate operational elements from a safety and permitting viewpoint. Appendix D provides background information on the decision and implications of collocating the two facilities.

Streit, R.D.; Throop, A.L.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance to someone by E-mail Share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Facebook Tweet about Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Twitter Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Google Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Delicious Rank Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Digg Find More places to share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on AddThis.com... Quick Links Solution Center Weatherization Assistance Program Technical Assistance Center

328

Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 July 29, 2004 Fiscal Year 2004, Annual Report to the Office of Management and Budget, Standards use and Participation The Department of Energy (DOE) implements the federal guidance and requirements of OMB Circular A-119 (OMB A-119) and the statutory requirements of Public Law (PL) 104-113 (15 USC 272) regarding the use of voluntary consensus standards (VCSs) through specific Departmental directives (policies, orders, requirements, guides, and technical standards) and supporting programs and management systems. Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, Office of Management and Budget Report for FY-2012 - December 19, 2012

329

Statutory Authorities, Office of Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Statutory Authorities Statutory Authorities Established in 1947, DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) fulfills the agency's responsibilities related to the collection, preservation, and dissemination of scientific and technical information emanating from DOE R&D activities. This responsibility has been codified in the organic, or enabling, legislation of DOE and its predecessor agencies and, more recently, was defined as a specific OSTI responsibility in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Energy Policy Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58), Section 982, called out responsibility of OSTI: "The Secretary, through the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, shall maintain with the Department publicly available collections of scientific and technical information resulting

330

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community The objective of this technical arrangement is to establish a framework for co-operation between the Parties in the field of nuclear-related technology research and development based upon mutual benefit. The co-operation is intended to occur in specific areas where the programs of the Parties complement one another as well as those in which comparability exists. 4.5.1.1.3.3_eu_agreement.pdf More Documents & Publications International_Agreements_January_2001_December_2004.pdf International Agreements Comments EM International Strategic Plan 2010-2015

331

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community The objective of this technical arrangement is to establish a framework for co-operation between the Parties in the field of nuclear-related technology research and development based upon mutual benefit. The co-operation is intended to occur in specific areas where the programs of the Parties complement one another as well as those in which comparability exists. 4.5.1.1.3.3_eu_agreement.pdf More Documents & Publications International_Agreements_January_2001_December_2004.pdf International Agreements Comments Scanned_Agreement.pdf

332

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM C C A A L L E E N N D D A A R R Y Y E E A A R R S S 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 - - 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 B B I I E E N N N N I I A A L L R R E E P P O O R R T T UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY November 2013 INTENTIONALLY BLANK FTCP 2011-2012 Biennial Report ~ 2 ~ Table of Contents Section Title Page 1.0 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................... 3 2.0 2011/2012 Accomplishments.......................................................................... 3

333

RADTRAN 6 technical manual.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Manual contains descriptions of the calculation models and mathematical and numerical methods used in the RADTRAN 6 computer code for transportation risk and consequence assessment. The RADTRAN 6 code combines user-supplied input data with values from an internal library of physical and radiological data to calculate the expected radiological consequences and risks associated with the transportation of radioactive material. Radiological consequences and risks are estimated with numerical models of exposure pathways, receptor populations, package behavior in accidents, and accident severity and probability.

Weiner, Ruth F.; Neuhauser, Karen Sieglinde; Heames, Terence John; O'Donnell, Brandon M.; Dennis, Matthew L.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Proposal for a Guide for Quality Management Systems for PV Manufacturing: Supplemental Requirements to ISO 9001-2008 (Revised)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This technical specification provides a guideline for photovoltaic module manufacturers to produce modules that, once the design has proven to meet the quality and reliability requirements, replicate such design in an industrial scale without compromising its consistency with the requirements.

Norum, P.; Sinicco, I.; Eguchi, Y.; Lokanath, S.; Zhou, W.; Brueggemann, G.; Mikonowicz, A.; Yamamichi, M.; Kurtz, S.

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Final Scientific/Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

JHU/APL conducted solid propellant fire characterization tests in warm, humid, ambient conditions near sea level. Yttria and ceria surrogate materials were placed in the fires. The substrates simulating ground surfaces were concrete from a Kennedy Space Center launch pad, and steel covered with a protective ablative material representing a launch platform. In-situ instrumentation consisted of witness materials, thermocouples, air handlers, filters, and cascade impactors; remote instrumentation consisted of optical cameras and spectrometers. Test and analysis team members included the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Alliant Techsystems, and the Johns Hopkins University. Test data were analyzed, reported, and delivered, including plume rise and transport captured on video. Derivation of the alumina particle size distributions formed the basis for condensing vapor and agglomeration estimates. Assessment of alumina mass in the plume, along with the surrogate fraction from filter forensics, provided an estimate of airborne surrogate mass. Technical interchange meetings were held with SNL and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Specifications for the fire environment were developed and delivered. A thermochemistry model that simultaneously provides the maximum temperature and heat flux was developed and delivered. An SPIE paper on 3D pyrometry of the fire was written and presented.

Chang, Yale [JHU/APL; Thomas, Michael E. [JHU/APL; Siegrist, Karen M. [JHU/APL; Lennon, Andrew M. [JHU/APL; Hunter, Lawrence W. [JHU/APL; Oguz, Hasan O. [JHU/APL

2014-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Assistance Assistance Technical Assistance Best practice-based technical assistance is provided through a combination of OE staff, and nationally-recognized experts at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Regulatory Assistance Project, the National Council on Electricity Policy, the National Council of State Legislatures, and the National Governors Association, and others. With these entities, the expert technical assistance is provided on an as-requested basis to State public utility commissions, State legislatures, regional State associations, regional transmission organizations/independent system operators, Federal officials, Governors' offices, State energy offices, and sometimes individual electric utilities. Technical Assistance on EPA Rules Implementation to States and the Utility

337

Technical Publications | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

project reports, conference proceedings and journal articles, technical presentations, Web sites, and other formats. Hydrogen General Production Delivery Storage Fuel Cells...

338

DOE and NREL Technical Assistance  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This poster highlights the technical assistance provided by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory to Greensburg, Kansas.

339

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Assistance The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers technical assistance to help agencies implement energy- and water-efficient technologies into Federal buildings and...

340

Technical Reports | ornl.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) technical report collections at the Research Library include ORNL authored reports as well as those from many other institutions. Most...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Scientific and Technical Information Management  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes requirements and responsibilities for managing DOE's scientific and technical information. Cancels DOE O 241.1. Canceled by DOE O 241.1B.

2003-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

342

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub May 14, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board Chairs Meeting in Paducah, where Huizenga spoke April 18. Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board

343

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub May 14, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board Chairs Meeting in Paducah, where Huizenga spoke April 18. Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board

344

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Los Alamos Field Office- FY14  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The FY14 self-assessment of the Technical Qualifications Program (TQP) and Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) was conducted to provide Los Alamos Field Office (NA-LA) management specific information related to effectiveness of the documentation and implementation of these programs.

345

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Carlsbad Field Office- 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Management Assessment (MA-12-08) was conducted from October 1-31, 2012. The management assessment team evaluated the specific requirement implementation, processes, and performance areas of the CBFO Technical Qualification Program (TQP). The assessment covered the relevant parts of DOE 0 426.1, Federal Technical Capability.

346

Microsoft Word - LBNL-57260-Revision.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7260-Revision 7260-Revision ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Pharmaceutical Industry An ENERGY STAR ® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers Christina Galitsky, Sheng-chieh Chang, Ernst Worrell, and Eric Masanet Environmental Energy Technologies Division Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 2008 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes

347

ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS This document provides guidance and objectives and criteria to support assessments required by DOE O 426.1 Federal Technical Capability (FTC), Section 4. REQUIREMENTS, paragraph b. FTC Program Implementation, subparagraph (7) Self- Assessment. This FTC Order paragraph requires self-assessment of TQP and FTC Program implementation within one's organization. To ensure effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP), Headquarters and field elements conduct self-assessments of these programs. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self-assessments and determines if further action is

348

Approved Site Treatment Plan, Volumes 1 and 2. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR), has prepared the Site Treatment Plan (STP) for Savannah River Site (SRS) mixed wastes in accordance with RCRA Section 3021(b), and SCDHEC has approved the STP (except for certain offsite wastes) and issued an order enforcing the STP commitments in Volume 1. DOE-SR and SCDHEC agree that this STP fulfills the requirements contained in the FFCAct, RCRA Section 3021, and therefore, pursuant to Section 105(a) of the FFCAct (RCRA Section 3021(b)(5)), DOE`s requirements are to implement the plan for the development of treatment capacities and technologies pursuant to RCRA Section 3021. Emerging and new technologies not yet considered may be identified to manage waste more safely, effectively, and at lower cost than technologies currently identified in the plan. DOE will continue to evaluate and develop technologies that offer potential advantages in public acceptance, privatization, consolidation, risk abatement, performance, and life-cycle cost. Should technologies that offer such advantages be identified, DOE may request a revision/modification of the STP in accordance with the provisions of Consent Order 95-22-HW. The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume 1) identifies project activity schedule milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR). Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume 2) and is provided for information.

Helmich, E.H.; Molen, G.; Noller, D.

1996-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

349

Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8 8 Varnish cache server Browse Upload data GDR 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142279738 Varnish cache server Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials Dataset Summary Description Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of MaterialsGuidance on materials selection for hydrogen service is needed to support the deployment of hydrogen as a fuel as well as the development of codes and standards for stationary hydrogen use, hydrogen vehicles, refueling stations, and hydrogen transportation. Materials property measurement is needed on deformation, fracture and fatigue of metals in environments relevant to this hydrogen economy infrastructure. The identification of hydrogen-affected material properties such as strength, fracture resistance and fatigue resistance are high priorities to ensure the safe design of load-bearing structures.To support the needs of the hydrogen community, Sandia National Laboratories is conducting an extensive review of reports and journal publications to gather existing materials data for inclusion in the Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials. Additionally, Sandia is working internationally with collaborators to acquire newly generated data for inclusion in the Technical Reference. SAND2012-7321 is an archival report issued by Sandia National Laboratories representing the reference information compiled as of September 2012. Updates and additions of individual sections of this report are available at http://www.sandia.gov/matlsTechRef.Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of MaterialsThe Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials is intended to be a complement to the Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials. Although still in the development stage, the Technical Database will provide a repository of technical data measured in hydrogen and is meant to be an engineering tool to aid the selection of materials for use in hydrogen.

350

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project was very successful in terms of providing a unique source of information for rural communities and landowners. We are very pleased with the overall results and believe that this is a vital program for the sustainable development of wind energy. The outreach materials created by Windustry are filling a serious void in information about how local communities and rural landowners can participate in wind development projects. In our program implementation we learned how great the demand is for this type of information both through our hotline calls and website usage. We also realized that the materials require constant updating and maintenance. There is a balance that needs to be found in printing the materials to have handouts ready at meetings for our primary target audience and more research and revisions for the website materials. All of this work is of an ongoing nature. Since this funding was awarded for one year, Windustry will be seeking other funding sources to continue the work in future years. Below is a summary of the Windustry accomplishments as well a sampling of website usage reports. Windustry is appreciative of the US DOE for its support of this wind energy industry work and the Wind Powering America initiative.

Lisa M. Daniels

2002-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

351

Protocol for EM Review/Field Self-Assessment of Site Specific Quality Assurance Programs/Quality Implementation Plans  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review protocol and lines of inquiry that are used as basis for technical review and approval of site-specific quality assurance programs.

352

MAGNET CELL SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-16 Revision 02  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MAGNET CELL SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-16 Page i Revision 02 July 19, 2006 NATIONAL HIGH MAGNETIC: MAGNET CELL SAFETY PROCEDURE ______________________________________________________ HEAD of MAGNET ______________________________________________________ HEAD of FACILITIES John Kynoch #12;MAGNET CELL SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-16 Pageii Revision 02 July 19

Weston, Ken

353

Policy Flash 2015 Revision to the Federal Assistance Reporting...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Revision to the Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist, DOE F 4600.2 (102014). Policy Flash 2015 Revision to the Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist, DOE F 4600.2 (102014)....

354

Microsoft Word - NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 4-final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Characterization Program Revision 4 May 2013 This document supersedes Revision 3 of DOECBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU...

355

Psychometric properties of the revised marital satisfaction inventory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This study examines the psychometric properties of the Revised marital Satisfaction Inventory (MSI-R) using archival data from previous validation studies of the original instrument. Normalized T-scores were identified for each of the 11 revised...

Aikman, Grace Glass

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

356

Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

357

EIS 0026: Revision of the Record of Decision | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS 0026: Revision of the Record of Decision EIS 0026: Revision of the Record of Decision Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase DOE has decided to dispose of up to 2,500 cubic...

358

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

April 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are requested to submit revisions if the change is greater than 500 million

359

EV Technical Center  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

December 2000 December 2000 AQMD CONTRACT #00192 Project Number: TC-00-0101 Report Number: TC-00-0101-TR02 Electric Vehicle Technical Center Prepared by: Ricardo Solares Juan C. Argueta Southern California Edison December 20, 2000 Page i DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES This report was prepared by the Electric Transportation Division of Southern California Edison, a subsidiary of Edison International. Neither the Electric Transportation Division of Southern California Edison, Southern California Edison, Edison International, nor any person working for or on behalf of any of them makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, (i) with respect to the use of any information, product, process or procedure discussed in this report, including

360

Technical Reference OVERVIEW  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Page 1 Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Page 1 Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Technical Reference OVERVIEW The ENERGY STAR score provides a fair assessment of the energy performance of a property relative to its peers, taking into account the climate, weather, and business activities at the property. Parking areas are not eligible to earn the ENERGY STAR score. However, because parking is a common amenity at other commercial building types (i.e., office and hotels), the ENERGY STAR score does make adjustments to accommodate for the presence of parking.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

EV Technical Center  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Carrier Route Vehicles Carrier Route Vehicles Quarterly Report, June 2001 AQMD CONTRACT #00192 Project Number: TC-00-0101 Report Number: TC-00-0101-TR04 Electric Vehicle Technical Center An ISO 9001 Certified Facility Prepared by: Michel Wehrey Juan C. Argueta Julie M. Phung Southern California Edison June 15, 2001 Page i DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES This report was prepared by the Electric Transportation Division of Southern California Edison, a subsidiary of Edison International. Neither the Electric Transportation Division of Southern California Edison, Southern California Edison, Edison International, nor any person working for or on behalf of any of them makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, (i) with respect to the

362

LLNL 1981: technical horizons  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Research programs at LLNL for 1981 are described in broad terms. In his annual State of the Laboratory address, Director Roger Batzel projected a $481 million operating budget for fiscal year 1982, up nearly 13% from last year. In projects for the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense, the Laboratory applies its technical facilities and capabilities to nuclear weapons design and development and other areas of defense research that include inertial confinement fusion, nonnuclear ordnances, and particle-beam technology. LLNL is also applying its unique experience and capabilities to a variety of projects that will help the nation meet its energy needs in an environmentally acceptable manner. A sampling of recent achievements by LLNL support organizations indicates their diversity. (GHT)

Not Available

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

FINAL/ SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL REPORT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The overall objective of the Chattanooga fuel cell demonstrations project was to develop and demonstrate a prototype 5-kW grid-parallel, solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system that co-produces hydrogen, based on Ion America’s technology. The commercial viability of the 5kW SOFC system was tested by transporting, installing and commissioning the SOFC system at the Alternative Energy Laboratory at the University of Tennessee – Chattanooga. The system also demonstrated the efficiency and the reliability of the system running on natural gas. This project successfully contributed to the achievement of DOE technology validation milestones from the Technology Validation section of the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan. Results of the project can be found in the final technical report.

McDonald, Henry; Singh, Suminderpal

2006-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

364

Technical planning activity: Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In April 1985, the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Fusion Energy commissioned the Technical Planning Activity (TPA). The purpose of this activity was to develop a technical planning methodology and prepare technical plans in support of the strategic and policy framework of the Magnetic Fusion Program Plan issued by DOE in February 1985. Although this report represents the views of only the US magnetic fusion community, it is international in scope in the sense that the technical plans contained herein describe the full scope of the tasks that are prerequisites for the commercialization of fusion energy. The TPA has developed a well-structured methodology that includes detailed definitions of technical issues, definitions of program areas and elements, statements of research and development objectives, identification of key decision points and milestones, and descriptions of facility requirements.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

AutoCAD discipline layering convention. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a user`s guide to establishing layering standards for drawing development. Uniform layering standards are established to exchange of AutoCAD datasets between organizations and companies. Consistency in the layering conventions assists the user through logical separation and identification of drawing data. This allows the user to view and plot related aspects of a drawing separately or in combination. The use of color and Linetype by layer is the preferred layering convention method, however to accommodate specific needs, colors and linetypes can also be assigned on an entity basis. New drawing setup files (also identified in AutoCAD documentation as Prototype drawings) use this layering convention to establish discipline drawing layers that are routinely used. Additions, deletions or revisions to the layering conventions are encourage.

Nielsen, B.L.

1995-05-17T23:59:59.000Z

366

Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages (Revised)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy has issued a challenge to the homebuilding industry to build 220,000 high-performance homes by 2012. To qualify, homes must meet the requirements of a performance path, prescriptive path, or participating in a partner program.

Roberts, D. R.; Anderson, R.

2009-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Design guidelines for carbon-dioxide scrubbers. Revision A. Technical manual  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Design data and guidelines are presented to help predict the performance of axial flow carbon dioxide canister designs using alkali metal hydroxide absorbers. The design data are derived from a large series of laboratory tests conducted at the Naval Coastal Systems Center to isolate the effects of environmental and goemetric parameters on canister absorption efficiency. Sample canister designs are considered to demonstrate the use of the derived data to predict effective canister life and pressure drop levels. Alternative techniques for the sorption of carbon dioxide are also reviewed.

Nuckols, M.L.; Purer, A.; Deason, G.A.

1985-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

On a revised ocean-atmosphere physical coupling interface and about technical coupling software  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

linking the main model components of present-day Earth System models (ESMs), i.e. the atmosphere constraints of Earth System Models (ESMs) as a whole and each component individually, including laws

369

BSCMeasuresInformationRevisionSept2005.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Procurement System Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures Information Document Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Revised: September 2005 2 Table of Contents Purpose ...................................................................................................... 4 CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE Customer Satisfaction: Timeliness ........................................................................................... 5 Quality ................................................................................................ 7 Effective Service/Partnership ........................................................................... 9 INTERNAL BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE Acquisition Excellence .................................................................................. 11

370

BIOLOGICAL SAFETY MANUAL Revised April 2004  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BIOLOGICAL SAFETY MANUAL Revised April 2004 #12;TABLE OF CONTENTS Emergency Numbers iv Awareness: Biological Safety Cabinets 31 Appendix D: Working Safely in a Biological Safety Cabinet 33 Ultraviolet and Tissue Culture Systems 50 Classification of Cell and/or Tissue Cultures According to Containment Level

Holland, Jeffrey

371

Revised 2/2012 PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 2/2012 PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR REQUIREMENTS (Effective August 2012) Name: ID#: First Semester FOUNDATION COURSES (20 units): PSYC-101 General Psychology PSYC-260 Psychological Statistics PSYC-270 Biological Psychology RHET 203 Writing in Psychology (or RHET 301) PSYC-265 Research Design ONE DIVERSITY

Galles, David

372

Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality, Revision 6  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is revision 6 of the Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality. This report is required reading for the training of criticality professionals in many organizations both nationally and internationally. This report describes many different classes of nuclear criticality anomalies that are different than expected.

Clayton, E. D.; Prichard, Andrew W.; Durst, Bonita E.; Erickson, David; Puigh, Raymond J.

2010-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

373

Stephen Johnson Last revised November 2010  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Stephen Johnson fonds Last revised November 2010 University of British Columbia Archives #12;Table Stephen Johnson fonds. ­ 1974-1984. 13 cm of textual records. Biographical Sketch Stephen Johnson of the projects with which Johnson was associated include Canadian Serial Directory, Journal of Canadian Library

Handy, Todd C.

374

Revised: May 2011 Fraud Prevention Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised: May 2011 Fraud Prevention Policy #12;Fraud Prevention Policy March 2011 1 Contents Page 1 of Audit 6 10. Notification of Suspected Fraud 7 11. Fraud Response Plan 7 12. Dissemination of the Policy 8 Appendix A Fraud Response Plan 9 Appendix B Further Reference 15 #12;Fraud Prevention Policy March

Mottram, Nigel

375

ACTION PLANS STRATEGIC PRIORITY: Role Clarification (revised)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

with the President, Director & Associate Director. Review current communications plan for Executive and BoardACTION PLANS STRATEGIC PRIORITY: Role Clarification (revised) GOAL Foster pride and participation informed MAA Board Investigate an increase in number of Executive Committee meetings with standard agenda

Thompson, Michael

376

Revised 2006 UNDERGRADUATE MINOR IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 2006 UNDERGRADUATE MINOR IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Instructions for declaring the ME Services Office (Building 530, room 125) · Submit the form to Student Services and the login to Axess students to the breadth of Mechanical Engineering topics and analytic design activities. Prerequisites

Prinz, Friedrich B.

377

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

January 2007 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

378

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

March 2009 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

379

Revised Nov. 2013 Contracting and Procurement Services  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised Nov. 2013 Contracting and Procurement Services Contract and Purchase Order Cover Sheet Procedures The Contract and Purchase Order Cover Sheet is an internal document utilized by Contracting the business purpose of the proposed purchase or contract; 2) Identify courses offered for credit at off campus

Caughman, John

380

Last revised: December 2011 CH 153K  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-volume reference tool such as the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. It mightLast revised: December 2011 CH 153K Finding Physical and Chemical Property be electronic versions of printed books (e.g. the CRC Handbook), or they may

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

OPTIMIZATION TOPICS LIST Revised April 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 OPTIMIZATION TOPICS LIST Revised April 2012 For Fall 2012 and Spring 2013 we will adopt. Bertsimas and J. Tsitsiklis, Introduction to Linear Optimization, Athena Scientific, 1997 2. M. C. Ferris, O and mixed integer models · Existence of optimal solutions, optimality conditions · Branch and bound methods

Radeloff, Volker C.

382

Revised October 2013 BACHELOR of ARTS DEGREE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Science: (Please see FAU catalog for possible prerequisite courses) MAC MAC MAD MAC MAS STA MAA MAS MTG, or electronically for people with disabilities. Please allow at least 10 days to process this request. #12;Revised MAT CIS MAS MAD MTG MAT

Fernandez, Eduardo

383

Last revised July 2008 Harvard University  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Last revised July 2008 Harvard University Purchasing Card Individual Cardholder Application, Part 1 Harvard Office Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code Harvard Phone Number ( ) - 33-Digit Default General") are pleased to offer you the Purchasing Card. The Purchasing Card represents Harvard's trust in you

Chen, Yiling

384

FACULTY HANDBOOK Last Revised: July 31, 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for which the handbook does not provide answers. As policies, procedures, and operating guidelinesFACULTY HANDBOOK Last Revised: July 31, 2012 Foreword The purpose of publishing the Faculty Handbook is to provide ready access to information concerning the orderly operation of the University

Thaxton, Christopher S.

385

FACULTY HANDBOOK Last Revised: August 13, 2014  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for which the handbook does not provide answers. As policies, procedures, and operating guidelinesFACULTY HANDBOOK Last Revised: August 13, 2014 Foreword The purpose of publishing the Faculty Handbook is to provide ready access to information concerning the orderly operation of the University

Thaxton, Christopher S.

386

FACULTY HANDBOOK Last Revised: August 15, 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for which the handbook does not provide answers. As policies, procedures, and operating guidelinesFACULTY HANDBOOK Last Revised: August 15, 2013 Foreword The purpose of publishing the Faculty Handbook is to provide ready access to information concerning the orderly operation of the University

Thaxton, Christopher S.

387

Curriculum Vitae | ANTHONY FAIOLA Revised 3/3/20141 CURRICULUM VITAE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Vitae | ANTHONY FAIOLA Revised 3/3/20141 CURRICULUM VITAE ANTHONY FAIOLA;___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Curriculum Vitae | ANTHONY FAIOLA Revised 3___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Curriculum

Zhou, Yaoqi

388

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Information Resources Information Resources Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Hydrogen Technical Publications on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Technical Publications Hydrogen Fuel Cells Safety, Codes & Standards

389

Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Technical...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Technical Assistance - Fact Sheet, May 2014 Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Technical Assistance - Fact...

390

Residential Energy Efficiency Technical Update Meeting: August...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Residential Energy Efficiency Technical Update Meeting: August 2011 Residential Energy Efficiency Technical Update Meeting: August 2011 On this page, you may link to the summary...

391

Applications for Alaska Strategic Technical Assistance Response...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Applications for Alaska Strategic Technical Assistance Response Team Program Are Due Feb. 6 Applications for Alaska Strategic Technical Assistance Response Team Program Are Due...

392

Water Heating Standing Technical Committee Presentation | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Water Heating Standing Technical Committee Presentation Water Heating Standing Technical Committee Presentation This presentation outlines the goals of the Water Heating Standing...

393

Building America Residential Energy Efficiency Technical Update...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Residential Energy Efficiency Technical Update Meeting: August 2011 Building America Residential Energy Efficiency Technical Update Meeting: August 2011 On this page, you may link...

394

DOE Publishes Technical Brief Clarifying Misconceptions about...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Technical Brief Clarifying Misconceptions about Safety of LED Lighting DOE Publishes Technical Brief Clarifying Misconceptions about Safety of LED Lighting October 22, 2014 -...

395

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2012 | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2012 Inside this issue: Featured DOE Technical Standards Activities DOE Technical Handbook, Accident Investigation and Prevention, Volumes I and II is Released Workshops and...

396

A Technical Databook for Geothermal Energy Utilization  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A TECHNICAL DATABOOK FOR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY UTILIZATION S.L.Technical Databook for Geothermal Energy Utilization* s. L.Survey, Menlo Park, CA. Geothermal Energy Development, CA.

Phillips, S.L.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

Ocean Thermal Extractable Energy Visualization: Final Technical...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Ocean Thermal Extractable Energy Visualization: Final Technical Report Ocean Thermal Extractable Energy Visualization: Final Technical Report Report about the Ocean Thermal...

398

MAR ASSESSMENTS OF THE HIGH LEVEL WASTE SYSTEM PLAN REVISION 16  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

High-level waste (HLW) throughput (i.e., the amount of waste processed per unit of time) is primarily a function of two critical parameters: waste loading (WL) and melt rate. For the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), increasing HLW throughput would significantly reduce the overall mission life cycle costs for the Department of Energy (DOE). Significant increases in waste throughput have been achieved at DWPF since initial radioactive operations began in 1996. Key technical and operational initiatives that supported increased waste throughput included improvements in facility attainment, the Chemical Processing Cell (CPC) flowsheet, process control models and frit formulations. As a result of these key initiatives, DWPF increased WLs from a nominal 28% for Sludge Batch 2 (SB2) to {approx}34 to 38% for SB3 through SB6 while maintaining or slightly improving canister fill times. Although considerable improvements in waste throughput have been obtained, future contractual waste loading targets are nominally 40%, while canister production rates are also expected to increase (to a rate of 325 to 400 canisters per year). Although implementation of bubblers have made a positive impact on increasing melt rate for recent sludge batches targeting WLs in the mid30s, higher WLs will ultimately make the feeds to DWPF more challenging to process. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) recently requested the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to perform a paper study assessment using future sludge projections to evaluate whether the current Process Composition Control System (PCCS) algorithms would provide projected operating windows to allow future contractual WL targets to be met. More specifically, the objective of this study was to evaluate future sludge batch projections (based on Revision 16 of the HLW Systems Plan) with respect to projected operating windows using current PCCS models and associated constraints. Based on the assessments, the waste loading interval over which a glass system (i.e., a projected sludge composition with a candidate frit) is predicted to be acceptable can be defined (i.e., the projected operating window) which will provide insight into the ability to meet future contractual WL obligations. In this study, future contractual WL obligations are assumed to be 40%, which is the goal after all flowsheet enhancements have been implemented to support DWPF operations. For a system to be considered acceptable, candidate frits must be identified that provide access to at least 40% WL while accounting for potential variation in the sludge resulting from differences in batch-to-batch transfers into the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) and/or analytical uncertainties. In more general terms, this study will assess whether or not the current glass formulation strategy (based on the use of the Nominal and Variation Stage assessments) and current PCCS models will allow access to compositional regions required to targeted higher WLs for future operations. Some of the key questions to be considered in this study include: (1) If higher WLs are attainable with current process control models, are the models valid in these compositional regions? If the higher WL glass regions are outside current model development or validation ranges, is there existing data that could be used to demonstrate model applicability (or lack thereof)? If not, experimental data may be required to revise current models or serve as validation data with the existing models. (2) Are there compositional trends in frit space that are required by the PCCS models to obtain access to these higher WLs? If so, are there potential issues with the compositions of the associated frits (e.g., limitations on the B{sub 2}O{sub 3} and/or Li{sub 2}O concentrations) as they are compared to model development/validation ranges or to the term 'borosilicate' glass? If limitations on the frit compositional range are realized, what is the impact of these restrictions on other glass properties such as the ability to suppress nepheline formation or influence m

Peeler, D.; Edwards, T.

2011-08-05T23:59:59.000Z

399

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009 Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009 Printed Copies of this Document with the Department of Health & Safety) the type of hand protection required for the specific hand hazard; Provide

deYoung, Brad

400

ePC-SAFT revised  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract So far, the electrolyte PC-SAFT equation of state developed in Cameretti et al. (2005) has been applied to model solution densities, vapor–liquid equilibria (VLE), liquid–liquid equilibria (LLE), and solid–liquid equilibria (SLE) of solutions containing electrolytes. For that purpose, two ion-specific parameters were used to characterize any ion: the diameter of the solvated ion and the dispersion-energy parameter between ion and solvent. Dispersion was only considered between ions and solvents. Considering the small number of adjustable parameters, this approach yielded acceptable results especially for low and moderate electrolyte concentrations. However, for high salt concentrations, a distinct deviation between modeled and experimental data was observed. In this work a new modeling approach is suggested that accounts explicitly also for dispersion interactions between anions and cations. This yields a much more precise description of electrolyte solutions at higher concentrations compared to original ePC-SAFT. With this new approach it is also possible to directly model weak electrolyte solutions without using an additional approach that accounts for ion-pair formation. The new approach for applying ePC-SAFT is now able to model phase equilibria (VLE, LLE, SLE) of ternary electrolyte solutions containing water, organic solvents, salts, and amino acids even at high salt concentrations in good agreement with experimental data.

Christoph Held; Thomas Reschke; Sultan Mohammad; Armando Luza; Gabriele Sadowski

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Effective marketing of technical innovation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Recent trends in the global business market point to the increasing importance of technology and technical innovations to gain and maintain competitive business strategic advantage. However, the marketing of technical innovations throughout the supply chain is still governed by traditional strategies and practices. Such strategies and practices are ineffective in a highly technologically advanced marketplace. As a result, the marketers of technologically innovative products and concepts are left with many questions and very few practical answers. This research offers a practical, integrated approach to marketing technical innovations. The approach offered is presented within an organisational, people and technology strategic context. A field study is utilised to illustrate the utility of the proposed approach.

Andrew J. Czuchry; Mahmoud M. Yasin

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project developed a new high-performance R-10/high SHGC window design, reviewed market positioning and evaluated manufacturing solutions required for broad market adoption. The project objectives were accomplished by: identifying viable technical solutions based on modeling of modern and potential coating stacks and IGU designs; development of new coating material sets for HM thin film stacks, as well as improved HM IGU designs to accept multiple layers of HM films; matching promising new coating designs with new HM IGU designs to demonstrate performance gains; and, in cooperation with a window manufacturer, assess the potential for high-volume manufacturing and cost efficiency of a HM-based R-10 window with improved solar heat gain characteristics. A broad view of available materials and design options was applied to achieve the desired improvements. Gated engineering methodologies were employed to guide the development process from concept generation to a window demonstration. The project determined that a slightly de-rated window performance allows formulation of a path to achieve the desired cost reductions to support end consumer adoption.

Stoessel, Chris

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

403

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

High-resolution tracking detectors based on Active Pixel Sensor (APS) have been valuable tools in Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics research, and have contributed to major discoveries. Their integration time, radiation length and readout rate is a limiting factor for the planed luminosity upgrades in nuclear and high-energy physics collider-based experiments. The goal of this program was to demonstrate and develop high-gain, high-resolution tracking detector arrays with faster readout, and shorter radiation length than APS arrays. These arrays may operate as direct charged particle detectors or as readouts of high resolution scintillating fiber arrays. During this program, we developed in CMOS large, high-resolution pixel sensor arrays with integrated readout, and reset at pixel level. Their intrinsic gain, high immunity to surface and moisture damage, will allow operating these detectors with minimal packaging/passivation requirements and will result in radiation length superior to APS. In Phase I, we designed and fabricated arrays with calorimetric output capable of sub-pixel resolution and sub-microsecond readout rate. The technical effort was dedicated to detector and readout structure development, performance verification, as well as to radiation damage and damage annealing.

STEFAN VASILE; ZHENG LI

2010-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

404

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

September 23, 2013 September 23, 2013 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is announcing changes Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are

405

Heating System Specification Specification of Heating System  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix A Heating System Specification /* Specification of Heating System (loosely based */ requestHeat : Room ­? bool; 306 #12; APPENDIX A. HEATING SYSTEM SPECIFICATION 307 /* user inputs */ livingPattern : Room ­? behaviour; setTemp : Room ­? num; heatSwitchOn, heatSwitchOff, userReset : simple

Day, Nancy

406

Coal-slurry pump development. Technical progress report No. 42  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Coal-Slurry Pump Development Program was initiated in October 1979 and planned for completion in December 1982. A proposal has been submitted to extend the end date to 30 June 1983 and the program is continuing with the revised schedule. In the first phase an experimental prototype of a two-stage, high pressure, centrifugal slurry pump was fabricated and assembled into a test unit. In the second phase the experimental pump was delivered to the Colorado School of Mines Research Institute test facility for initial testing in hot oil and subsequent testing in a coal-oil slurry environment. Rocketdyne will supply technical support and coordination on test facility interface requirements and for testing of the experimental pump to evaluate hydraulic, mechanical, material and operational performance characteristics. Because of the recent significant activities accomplished, this monthly report will cover the period up to 12 April 1983.

Wong, G.S.

1983-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

407

Technical Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Reports Technical Reports Technical Reports November 1, 2013 - 11:40am Addthis A wide range of resources addressing the many benefits of combined heat and power (CHP) is available, including the technical reports below. For example, Assessing the Benefits of On-Site Combined Heat and Power (CHP) During the August 14, 2003, Blackout highlights facilities that were able to remain operational during the 2003 blackout due to backup generators or distributed generation (DG) resources, including CHP. Assessing the Benefits of On-Site CHP During the August 14, 2003, Blackout, 29 pp, June 2004 Characterization of the U.S. Industrial/Commercial Boiler Population, 65 pp, May 2005 CHP: Connecting the Gap Between Markets and Utility Interconnection and Tariff Practices Part I, 34 pp, Mar. 2006 and Part II, 64 pp, Aug. 2006

408

Electricity Policy Technical Assistance Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Since 2003, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) has been providing independent and unbiased technical support to states, regions, and Tribes...

409

The SRNL Technical Assistance Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

For over two decades, SRNL has managed a dynamic and efficient national program sponsored by DOE Office of Environmental Management that provides teams of technical experts with a broad experience...

410

The Organisation of Technical Education  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... the faculties which was so necessary. Messrs-H. Ade Clark and W. J. Lineham urged for complete separation on the grounds that sympathy towards technical^ work was not ...

1911-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

411

Technical Database | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

56 56 Varnish cache server Browse Upload data GDR 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142281756 Varnish cache server Technical Database Dataset Summary Description Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials Source Sandia National Laboratories Date Released June 03rd, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated September 27th, 2012 (2 years ago) Keywords Compatibility of Materials hydrogen NREL Sandia Technical Database Technical Reference Data application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon 1100_cia85_ten_fra_fat.xlsx (xlsx, 60.9 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon 1100_san10_fra_fat.xlsx (xlsx, 58.5 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon 1100_san10b_fra_fat.xlsx (xlsx, 59.4 KiB)

412

Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6450-01-P 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431 Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN 1904-AC23 Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for Information (RFI); request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the "Department") intends to expand and revise its existing energy efficiency enforcement regulations for certain consumer products and commercial and industrial equipment covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended (EPCA or the "Act"). These regulations provide for manufacturer submission of compliance statements and

413

Last Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Instructions for Requesting Dry Ice at the APS Dry Ice requests are handled by APS Detector Pool staff. Dry ice should be requested through the Detector Pool database, similar to how detectors are requested. Dry ice is only available during normal business hours. Since dry ice must be obtained from a building other than the APS, requests must be made in advance to ensure availability of a government vehicle for transporting dry ice. Access the Detector Pool database via the link below. Requestors will be taken to a log-in page similar to the log-in page for the ESAF system. https://beam.aps.anl.gov/pls/apsweb/wam0002.dds_main_menu The page can also be found on the Optics and Detector Group homepage (the "Submit a Detector

414

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS) This WWW page is designed so that encoders can get current Listings of encoded particles with the 'NODES' on the right-hand side of the page. Disclaimer These sections are private PDG files. Please do not quote or refer to them. The authors reserve the right to radically alter these non-completed sections from minute to minute. They are certainly not error free. Conservation Laws The List by Particle Code (includes hidden particle codes) The List in Book Order by Name Light Unflavored Mesons Summary Table Other Light Unflavored Mesons Strange Mesons Summary Table Charmed Mesons Summary Table Charmed, Strange Mesons Summary Table (c cbar) Mesons Summary Table (b bbar) Mesons Summary Table Non (q qbar) Candidates

415

Bicyclic graphs with maximal revised Szeged index  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The revised Szeged index $Sz^*(G)$ is defined as $Sz^*(G)=\\sum_{e=uv \\in E}(n_u(e)+ n_0(e)/2)(n_v(e)+ n_0(e)/2),$ where $n_u(e)$ and $n_v(e)$ are, respectively, the number of vertices of $G$ lying closer to vertex $u$ than to vertex $v$ and the number of vertices of $G$ lying closer to vertex $v$ than to vertex $u$, and $n_0(e)$ is the number of vertices equidistant to $u$ and $v$. Hansen used the AutoGraphiX and made the following conjecture about the revised Szeged index for a connected bicyclic graph $G$ of order $n \\geq 6$:

Li, Xueliang

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

CTBT technical issues handbook  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this handbook is to give the nonspecialist in nuclear explosion physics and nuclear test monitoring an introduction to the topic as it pertains to a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). The authors have tried to make the handbook visually oriented, with figures paired to short discussions. As such, the handbook may be read straight through or in sections. The handbook covers four main areas and ends with a glossary, which includes both scientific terms and acronyms likely to be encountered during CTBT negotiations. The following topics are covered: (1) Physics of nuclear explosion experiments. This is a description of basic nuclear physics and elementary nuclear weapon design. Also discussed are testing practices. (2) Other nuclear experiments. This section discusses experiments that produce small amounts of nuclear energy but differ from explosion experiments discussed in the first chapter. This includes the type of activities, such as laser fusion, that would continue after a CTBT is in force. (3) Monitoring tests in various environments. This section describes the different physical environments in which a test could be conducted (underground, in the atmosphere, in space, underwater, and in the laboratory); the sources of non-nuclear events (such as earthquakes and mining operations); and the opportunities for evasion. (4) On-site inspections. A CTBT is likely to include these inspections as an element of the verification provisions, in order to resolve the nature of ambiguous events. This chapter describes some technical considerations and technologies that are likely to be useful. (5) Selecting verification measures. This chapter discusses the uncertain nature of the evidence from monitoring systems and how compliance judgments could be made, taking the uncertainties into account. It also discusses how to allocate monitoring resources, given the likelihood of testing by various countries in various environments.

Zucca, J.J. [ed.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Coal within a revised energy perspective  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The author considers the use of coal within a revised energy perspective, focusing on the factors that will drive which fuels are used to generate electricity going forward. He looks at the world markets for fossil fuels and the difficulties of predicting oil and natural gas supply and prices, as demonstrated by the variability in projections from one year to another in the EIA's Annual Energy Outlook. 4 refs., 1 tab.

Darmstadter, J. [Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, DC (United States)

2006-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

418

Career Map: Technical Trainer/Instructor  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Wind Program's Career Map provides job description information for Technical Trainer/Instructor positions.

419

Technical Meeting: Buildings-to-Grid Integration  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Background material from the December 2012, Buildings to Grid Integration Technical Meeting in Golden, CO.

420

FFCAct Clearinghouse, Directory of abstracts. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCAct) Clearinghouse is a card catalog of information about the FFCAct and its requirements for developing Site Treatment Plans (STP). The information available in the clearinghouse includes abstracts describing computer applications, technical reports, and a list of technical experts. Information can be accessed for use in responding to FFCAct requirements, and the clearinghouse provides search capabilities on particular topics and issues related to STP development. Appendix A includes: contacts from each site, for which contact has been made, who are developing STPs; the FFCAct Clearinghouse Fact Sheet and; additional hard copy forms to be used to populate the database. This report contains 50 abstracts related to the Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program.

Harwood, T.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Department of Energy Technical Standards Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Safety (HS-30) Nuclear Safety (HS-30) Office of Nuclear Safety Home Technical Standards Program » Search » Approved Standards » Recently Approved » RevCom for TSP » Monthly Status Reports » Archive » Feedback HSS Logo Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Office of Nuclear Safety Technical Standards Logo - Globe The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE. Online Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards Recently approved DOE Technical Standards Monthly Status Reports DOE Technical Standards Archive

422

DOE Technical Standards Archived Collection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Information Center » DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE Information Center » DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE Technical Standards Archived Collection DOE Technical Standards Archived Collection Document ID Filter Document ID sort descending Title Date DOE-HDBK-1131-2007 General Employee Radiological Training Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1131-2007 (CN1) (Reaffirmed 2013) This handbook describes the DOE General Employee Radiological Training program. It is intended for use by DOE contractors for the development of facility-specific general employee radiological training. 01/15/2008 DOE-HDBK-1131-98 General Employee Radiological Training Change Notice No. 1 (November 2003) | Reaffirmation with Errata (April 2004) | Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1131-2007 This handbook describes the DOE General Employee Radiological Training program. It includes standards and policies as well as recommendations for material development and program administration. It is intended for use by DOE contractors for the development of facility-specific general employee radiological training. 03/26/2004

423

DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions September 30, 2011 - 2:30pm Addthis On September 27, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) approved revisions to its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations, and on September 28th, submitted the revisions to the Federal Register. The final regulations, which become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, are the culmination of a 2-year process to review and update DOE's NEPA implementing procedures. This process involved internal evaluation, public participation, and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) review. The revisions are designed to focus Departmental resources on projects with the potential for significant environmental impact, to better

424

The Science Behind EPA's Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The Science Behind EPA's Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air The Science Behind EPA's Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone (O3) and Particulate Matter Speaker(s): Morton Lippmann Date: May 17, 1997 - 12:00pm Location: 90-3148 Seminar Host/Point of Contact: Richard Sextro Most scientific studies that are relevant to the setting of the NAAQS were not designed or performed with that specific application in mind, resulting in bits and pieces of the overall puzzle. Despite these limitations, the particulate matter (PM) and O3 literature reviews and analyses in the recently issued EPA Criteria documents and staff papers are the best prepared and most comprehensive ever available to an EPA Administrator as a basis for NAAQS decisions. This seminar will discuss the scientific basis

425

The revised BS PD 6493 assessment procedure -- Application to offshore structures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The BS PD 6493 procedure for the assessment of defects in welded components, which was originally published in 1980 and subsequently revised in 1991, has been used with some success by industry and is now applied extensively to offshore structures. Particular applications are the fitness-for-purpose assessment of fabrication and in-service defects, inspection scheduling and the determination of whether post-weld heat treatment is required. However, the current BS PD 6493 procedure is based on general principles and the extensive application of the procedure to a wide range of complex practical problems over the years has highlighted some of its limitations. These have been addressed in the latest review by the British Standards Institution`s WEE/37 Committee and this has resulted in a major revision of the PD 6493 procedure. A particularly important development is the incorporation of specific guidance on the assessment of offshore structures. This paper describes the new recommendations for offshore structures.

Stacey, A. [Health and Safety Executive, London (United Kingdom). Offshore Safety Div.; Burdekin, F.M. [UMIST, Manchester (United Kingdom). Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering; Maddox, S.J. [Welding Inst., Cambridge (United Kingdom). Structural Integrity Dept.

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Microsoft Word - TAD Performance Specification Rev 1 ICN 0 draft a.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

85 QA:QA 85 QA:QA Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister System Performance Specification Revision 1 / ICN 1 DOC ID: WMO-TADCS-000001 March 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management DOC.20080331.0001 Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister WMO-TADCS-000001 Rev. 1 / ICN 1 System Performance Specification DOE/RW-0585 ii PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister WMO-TADCS-000001 Rev. 1 / ICN 1 System Performance Specification DOE/RW-0585 iv REVISION HISTORY Revision Change A Initial Issue B For requirement number (5) and (6) in Section 3.1.1 changed "... or less

427

Superfluid helium as a technical coolant  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The characteristics of superfluid helium as a technical coolant, which derive from its specific transport properties, are presented with particular reference to the working area in the phase diagram (saturated or pressurised helium II). We then review the principles and scaling laws of heat transport by equivalent conduction and by forced convection in pressurised helium II, thus revealing intrinsic limitations as well as technological shortcomings of these cooling methods. Once properly implemented, two-phase flow of saturated helium II presents overwhelming advantages over the previous solutions, which dictated its choice for cooling below 1.9 K the long strings of superconducting magnets in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a 26.7 km circumference particle collider now under construction at CERN, the European Laboratory for Particle Physics near Geneva (Switzerland). We report on recent results from the ongoing research and development programme conducted on thermohydraulics of two-phase saturated helium II...

Lebrun, P

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Technical Reference | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Reference Reference Dataset Summary Description Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials Source Sandia National Laboratories Date Released June 03rd, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated September 27th, 2012 (2 years ago) Keywords Compatibility of Materials hydrogen NREL Sandia Technical Database Technical Reference Data application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon 1100_cia85_ten_fra_fat.xlsx (xlsx, 60.9 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon 1100_san10_fra_fat.xlsx (xlsx, 58.5 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon 1100_san10b_fra_fat.xlsx (xlsx, 59.4 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon 1100_san11_fra_fat.xlsx (xlsx, 48.4 KiB)

429

Technical Bulletins | Advanced Photon Source  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Bulletins Technical Bulletins For questions regarding the content of Technical Bulletins, contact webmaster. All documents are PDFs. TB # Title Date TB-54 Dose Calculations using MARS for Bremsstrahlung Beam Stops and Collimators in APS Beamline Stations 8/31/10 TB-53 Insertion Devices: Magnetic Measurements and Tuning--Part 1 - Magnetic Sensors and Measurement Techniques 10/1/10 TB-52 2006 XSD Scientific Software Workshop - Survey Responses 8/25/06 TB-51 2006 XSD Scientific Software Workshop Report 10/31/06 TB-50 Thermal Analysis of the Components of the Insertion Device Front Ends FEv1.2 and FEv1.5 7/1/05 TB-49 A New Magnetic Field Integral Measurement System 1/1/05 TB-48 LCLS Prototype Undulator Report 1/1/04 TB-47 XFD Progress Report 12/1/02 TB-46 LCLS - The First Experiments 9/1/02

430

Hydrogen Production Technical Team Roadmap  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Production Production Technical Team Roadmap June 2013 This roadmap is a document of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership. U.S. DRIVE (Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle efficiency and Energy sustainability) is a voluntary, non-binding, and nonlegal partnership among the U.S. Department of Energy; USCAR, representing Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors; Tesla Motors; five energy companies -BP America, Chevron Corporation, Phillips 66 Company, ExxonMobil Corporation, and Shell Oil Products US; two utilities - Southern California Edison and DTE Energy; and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). The Hydrogen Production Technical Team is one of 12 U.S. DRIVE technical teams ("tech teams") whose mission is to accelerate the development of pre-competitive and innovative technologies to enable

431

Optimization of Technical Diagnostics Procedures for Hydroelectric Power Plants  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper, a mathematical model is proposed for determination of the optimal solution for the maintenance system of a specific steel structure – the hydraulic power plant. The aim is to obtain the maximum efficiency of the plant within existing conditions and limitations. The objective of a mathematical model is to select the diagnostics parameters, which define knowledge of the permissible reliability level and certain analytic expression, which corresponds to precisely described state of hydroelectric power plant components assembly. Model of technical diagnostics procedures optimization represents a specific approach to problems of preventive maintaining according to state. It is related to the concept of state parameters change, which represents a basis for obtaining the optimal solution for procedures of technical diagnostics. It also creates direct relations between the law of the state parameter changes and reliability of the considered power plant components.

D. Nikoli?; R.R. Nikoli?; B. Krsti?; V. Lazi?; I.Ž. Nikoli?; I. Krsti?; V. Krsti?

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Flambeau River Papers Makes a Comeback with a Revised Energy...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

ITP LEADER Case Study: Flambeau River Papers Makes a Comeback With a Revised Energy Strategy Flambeau River Biofuels Demonstration-Scale Biorefinery FlambeauRiverBiofuels.pdf...

433

Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

W Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 1242014 Next Release Date: 12312015 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases...

434

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2013...

435

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2013...

436

,"New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2012...

437

,"New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2012...

438

Draft Revised Guidelines for Implementing Executive Order 11988, "Floodplain Management"  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Emergency Management Agency published the draft “Revised Guidelines for Implementing Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management” for public review and comment on January 30, 2015.

439

Neutron Physics A Revision of I. Halpern's Notes on E. Fermi's Lectures in 1945  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

'.. '.. iJNCLASSIFIED . UNITED x STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION . 1 I~, ., AECD-2664 ,# NEUTRON PHYSICS A Revision of I. Halpern's Notes on E. Fermi's Lectures in 1945 BY J. G. Beckerley October 16, 1951 [TIS Issuance Date] Atomic Energy Commission New York Operations :L : 't to TIC ;iiiii *=c; Technical Information Service, Oak Ridge, Tennessee . _ .._ U,NCLASSlFIEB DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that

440

Safety System Oversight Program Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Document (CRAD), Revision 0  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of 7 of 7 Safety System Oversight (SSO) Program Implementation Assessment Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRADs) Revision 0 PROGRAM (PGM) OBJECTIVE PGM.1 An effective SSO Program is established by the Field Element Manager to apply engineering expertise to maintain safety system configuration and to assess system condition and effectiveness of safety management program implementation. Criteria PGM.1.1 The SSO Qualification Program is part of the Technical Qualification Program (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b (1)). PGM.1.2 The SSO Program establishes appropriate training, qualification, and performance requirements for SSO personnel and the supervisors are held accountable for achieving them (DOE M 426.1-1A, Chapter III, Section 1, 2.b

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2002 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2002 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2002 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2002 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - May 2002 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation....................................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published................................................................... 1 American National Standards Institute...................................................................... 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International.............................................. 4 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2002 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2002 Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2002 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2001

442

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This grant provided the basic funding that enabled me to carry out a detailed characterization of the proteins used by the aerobic soil bacterium, Thermobifida fusca, to degrade cellulose and to study the mechanisms used by T. fusca to regulate cellulase synthesis. This work resulted in 53 publications and led to the decision by The DOE Joint Genome Institute to sequence the T. fusca genome. T. fusca is now recognized as one of the best studied cellulolytic microorganisms and our work led to the discovery of a novel class of cellulases, processive endoglucanases, which are found in many cellulolytic bacteria including both aerobes and anaerobes. In addition, we were able to determine the mechanism by which Cel9A caused processive hydrolysis of cellulose. This research also helped to explain why many cellulolytic microorganisms produce two different exocellulases, as we showed that these enzymes have different specificities, with one attacking the reducing end of a cellulose chain and the other attacking the nonreducing end. Our work also provided additional evidence for the importance of a cellulose binding domain (carbohydrate binding module) [CBM] in the hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose.

David B. Wilson

2008-04-02T23:59:59.000Z

443

Spent Nuclear Fuel Project technical baseline document. Fiscal year 1995: Volume 1, Baseline description  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a revision to WHC-SD-SNF-SD-002, and is issued to support the individual projects that make up the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project in the lower-tier functions, requirements, interfaces, and technical baseline items. It presents results of engineering analyses since Sept. 1994. The mission of the SNFP on the Hanford site is to provide safety, economic, environmentally sound management of Hanford SNF in a manner that stages it to final disposition. This particularly involves K Basin fuel, although other SNF is involved also.

Womack, J.C. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Cramond, R. [TRW (United States); Paedon, R.J. [SAIC (United States)] [and others

1995-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

444

Protocol for EM Review/Field Self-Assessment of Site-Specific QAPs/QIPs  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of this document is to present the review protocol and lines of inquiry (LOIs) that are used as basis for EM-HQ technical review and approval of site-specific QAP/QIPs.

445

Waste Receiving and Processing, Module 2A, feed specification: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Detailed descriptions of the various mixed low-level waste feed streams that will be processed in the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility, Module 2A (WRAP 2A) are provided. Feed stream descriptions are based on available reports, the solid waste information tracking system database, and the 1993 solid waste forecast data. Available chemical and physical attributes, radionuclide data, waste codes, and packaging information are shown for 15 feed streams. The information sources and methodology for obtaining projections for WRAP 2A expected feed stream volumes also are described.

Kruger, O.L.; Sheriff, M.L.

1994-11-14T23:59:59.000Z

446

NREL-Brazil Bilateral Technical Coordination | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bilateral Technical Coordination Jump to: navigation, search Logo: NREL-Brazil Bilateral Technical Coordination Name NREL-Brazil Bilateral Technical Coordination AgencyCompany...

447

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular Applications Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular Applications Technical report...

448

US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap The Fuel Cell Technical Team (FCTT) conducts the following activities: (1) Reviews and evaluates...

449

Technical Note Engineering Soils Maps  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Note Engineering Soils Maps PAUL M. SANTI Department of Geology and Geological database. In this technique, rose-pie charts provide an overall assessment of soils hazards structures such as pipelines, power lines, and roads; and regional evaluations of sources of ag- gregate

450

Defense Technical Information Center thesaurus  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This DTIC Thesaurus provides a basic multidisciplinary subject term vocabulary used by DTIC to index and retrieve scientific and technical information from its various data bases and to aid DTIC`s users in their information storage and retrieval operations. It includes an alphabetical posting term display, a hierarchy display, and a Keywork Out of Context (KWOC) display.

Dickert, J.H. [ed.] [comp.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

DOE FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT RP  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The City of Georgetown Utility Systems (GUS) patnered with the private sector, the American Public Power Association (APPA) and Southwestern University to design, construct, test and monitor a solar co-generation system directly connected to the GUS electric distribution system. This report consists of the Primary Technical Report and 3 attachments.

RUSS PETERMAN

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

(1) Technical Chemists' Handbook (2) Exercises in Elementary Quantitative Chemical Analysis for Students of Agriculture (3) Laboratory Manual of Qualitative Analysis (4) Synthetic Inorganic Chemistry (5) The Fundamental Conceptions of Chemistry (6) Kurzes Repetitorium der Chemie  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... (1) DR. Lunge's “Technical Chemists' Handbook” is a new and revised edition of the extremely useful little volume, well known ... of “The Alkali Makers' Focket-book,” and later as “The Alkali Makers' Handbook.” In many respects the new volume, in the preparation of which the author ...

J. B. C.

1908-12-24T23:59:59.000Z

453

Fitness for duty in the nuclear industry: Update of the technical issues 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide an update of information on the technical issues surrounding the creation, implementation, and maintenance of fitness-for-duty (FFD) policies and programs. It has been prepared as a resource for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and nuclear power plant personnel who deal with FFD programs. It contains a general overview and update on the technical issues that the NRC considered prior to the publication of its original FFD rule and the revisions to that rule (presented in earlier NUREG/CRs). It also includes chapters that address issues about which there is growing concern and/or about which there have been substantial changes since NUREG/CR-5784 was published. Although this report is intended to support the NRC`s rule making on fitness for duty, the conclusions of the authors of this report are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the NRC.

Durbin, N.; Grant, T. [eds.] [Battelle Seattle Research Center, WA (United States)

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Utility Advanced Turbine Systems Program (ATS) Technical Readiness Testing and Pre-Commercial Demonstration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of the ATS program is to develop ultra-high efficiency, environmentally superior and cost competitive gas turbine systems for base load application in utility, independent power producer and industrial markets. Specific performance targets have been set using natural gas as the primary fuel: {lg_bullet} System efficiency that will exceed 60%(lower heating value basis) on natural gas for large scale utility turbine systems; for industrial applications, systems that will result in a 15% improvement in heat rate compared to currently available gas turbine systems. {lg_bullet} An environmentally superior system that will not require the use of post combustion emissions controls under full load operating conditions. {lg_bullet} Busbar energy costs that are 10% less than current state-of-the-art turbine systems, while meeting the same environmental requirements. {lg_bullet} Fuel-flexible designs that will operate on natural gas but are capable of being adapted to operate on coal-derived or biomass fuels. {lg_bullet} Reliability-Availability-Maintainability (RAM) that is equivalent to the current turbine systems. {lg_bullet} Water consumption minimized to levels consistent with cost and efficiency goals. {lg_bullet} Commercial systems that will enter the market in the year 2000. In Phase I of the ATS program, Siemens Westinghouse found that efficiency significantly increases when the traditional combined-cycle power plant is reconfigured with closed-loop steam cooling of the hot gas path. Phase II activities involved the development of a 318MW natural gas fired turbine conceptual design with the flexibility to burn coal-derived and biomass fuels. Phases I and II of the ATS program have been completed. Phase III, the current phase, completes the research and development activities and develops hardware specifications from the Phase II conceptual design. This report summarizes Phase III Extension activities for a three-month period. Additional details may be found in monthly technical progress reports covering the period stated on the cover of this report. Background information regarding the work to be completed in Phase III may be found in the revised proposal submitted in response to A Request for Extension of DE-FC21-95MC32267, dated May 29, 1998 and the Continuing Applications of DE-FC21-95MC32267, dated March 31, 1999 and November 19, 1999.

Siemens Westinghouse

2001-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

455

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Los Alamos Site Office- 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This self-assessment of the Technical Qualifications and Federal Technical Capability program was conducted to provide Los Alamos Field Office (LAFO) management specific information related to effectiveness of the documentation and implementation of these programs. The conclusion of this assessment is that the areas assessed herein are compliant with the requirements, and that implementation of the requirements has been effective at this Field Office.

456

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This research consisted of a theoretical investigation of the properties of surface-based nanostructures, having as a main goal the deeper understanding of the atomic-scale mechanisms responsible for the formation and stability of such structures. This understanding will lead to the design of improved systems for applications in diverse areas such as novel electronic devices, sensors, field-effect transistors, substrates with enhanced hydro-phobic (water repelling) or hydro-philic (water absorbing) behavior for coatings of various surfaces used in bioengineering, flexible displays, organic photovoltaics, etc. The research consisted of developing new theoretical methodologies and applying them to a wide range of interesting physical systems. Highlights of the new methodologies include techniques for bridging different scales, from the quantum-mechanical electronic level to the meso-scopic level of large molecular structures such as DNA, carbon nanotubes and two-dimensional assemblies of organic molecules. These methodologies were successfully applied to investigate interactions between systems that are large on the atomic scale (reaching the scale of microns in length or milliseconds in time), but still incorporating all the essential elements of the atomic-scale structure. While the research performed here did not address applications directly, the implications of its finding are important in guiding experimental searches and in coming up with novel solutions to important problems. In this sense, the results of this work can be incorporated in the design of many useful applications. Specifically, in addition to elucidating important physical principles on how nano-structures are stabilized on surfaces, we have used our theoretical investigations to make predictions for useful applications in the following fields: a) we proposed new types of nanotubes that can overcome the limitations of the carbon nanotubes whose properties depend sensitively on the structure which cannot be controlled experimentally; b) we showed how carbon nanotubes can be employed in optical determination of the DNA base sequence, an exciting application for ultra-fast DNA sequencing; c) we proposed a nano-structure (titanium dioxide nano-wire) based design for organic photovoltaics using natural dyes, and showed that it will be an efficient system for the absorption of light and the charge transfer from the dye to the wire.

Efthimios Kaxiras

2009-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

457

Technical Analysis: Alternatives to Chart Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical analysis uses past price information to project future trends. This publication can help crop and livestock marketers learn how to use technical analysis in their risk management programs....

Purcell, Wayne D.

1999-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

458

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular Applications October 30, 2006 .....................................................................................................................................................................8 APPENDIX A: Review of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Systems ......................................................................................18 APPENDIX C: Presentation to the FreedomCAR & Fuel Hydrogen Storage Technical Team

459

NIST Technical Note 1753 Model Based Enterprise /  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lubell Kenway Chen John Horst Simon Frechette Paul Huang http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1753 #12;NIST Technical Note 1753 Model Based Enterprise / Technical Data Package Summit Report Joshua Lubell Kenway Chen

Perkins, Richard A.

460

TECHNICAL TRAINING QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Technical Training Qualification Standard Reference Guide December 2009 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ...........................................................................................................................................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Technical Fact Sheets | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Fact Sheets Technical Fact Sheets Technical Fact Sheets Technical Fact Sheets (TFS) provide summary-level information on the impact of new, deployed, applied, and/or planned technical approaches supporting EM cleanup projects. The TFS is presented as a two-page document which summarizes the technical challenges, solutions, accomplishments, and impacts of the technical efforts. Additionally, they present the features, vendors, sites, states, national labs and universities that might be involved in developing technical solutions. Deactivation & Decommissioning (D&D) GammaCam Technology Demonstration at ORNL Buildings 3026C and 3026D Stack Characterization System for Inspection of Contaminated Off-Gas Stacks 3-D Model for Deactivation & Decommissioning D&D and Risk Assessment Tools

462

International Energy: Subject Thesaurus. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The International Energy Agency: Subject Thesaurus contains the standard vocabulary of indexing terms (descriptors) developed and structured to build and maintain energy information databases. Involved in this cooperative task are (1) the technical staff of the USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) in cooperation with the member countries of the International Energy Agency`s Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) and (2) the International Atomic Energy Agency`s International Nuclear Information System (INIS) staff representing the more than 100 countries and organizations that record and index information for the international nuclear information community. ETDE member countries are also members of INIS. Nuclear information prepared for INIS by ETDE member countries is included in the ETDE Energy Database, which contains the online equivalent of the printed INIS Atomindex. Indexing terminology is therefore cooperatively standardized for use in both information systems. This structured vocabulary reflects thscope of international energy research, development, and technological programs. The terminology of this thesaurus aids in subject searching on commercial systems, such as ``Energy Science & Technology`` by DIALOG Information Services, ``Energy`` by STN International and the ``ETDE Energy Database`` by SilverPlatter. It is also the thesaurus for the Integrated Technical Information System (ITIS) online databases of the US Department of Energy.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

Minor Revision to Masters Program in Applied Social Psychology  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Minor Revision to Masters Program in Applied Social Psychology 1. Proposal Identification 1 1. Department contact person: Dr. Peter Grant Applied Social Psychology Program Coordinator Department of Psychology Tel: 966-6675 Fax: 966-6630 E-mail: peter.qrant(usaskca · Name of Revised Program: Masters program

Saskatchewan, University of

464

Revised: March 1, 2005 Page 1 UCSB Environmental Health & Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

safe for transport. #12;Revised: March 1, 2005 Page 3 · Abandoned and unlabeled chemical containersRevised: March 1, 2005 Page 1 UCSB Environmental Health & Safety Emergency Response Guidelines spill-cleanups, odor complaints, pickup of abandoned chemicals and related alarms (see Attachment). EH

Bigelow, Stephen

465

Revision Date 01.11.13 PROCUREMENT SERVICES -LOGISTICS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revision Date 01.11.13 PROCUREMENT SERVICES - LOGISTICS Reading and Reconciling an ePro and MMD with your FACSID. Prerequisites: None Find Help: Email logistics_team@unc.edu #12;Procurement Services - Logistics Reading and Reconciling an ePro and MMD Statement Revision Date 01.11.13 Page 2 of 6 Departmental

Crews, Stephen

466

1 INTRODUCTION Japanese standard Law was revised in 1998. The  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

a situation which does not comply with other requirements of the Building Standard Law, concerning fire safety, Ministry of Construction, Japan ABSTRACT: Japanese Building Standard Law was revised in 1998. The highlight1 INTRODUCTION Japanese standard Law was revised in 1998. The highlight related to the structural

Spencer Jr., B.F.

467

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast Principal Author: Ben Arikawa  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast March 1998 Principal Author: Ben Arikawa Electricity 1997 FORE08.DOC Page 1 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ELECTRICITY ANALYSIS OFFICE REVISED 1997 RETAIL ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECAST Introduction The Electricity Analysis Office of the California Energy Commission

468

Revised October 2013 JO RAE WRIGHT FELLOWSHIP for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised October 2013 JO RAE WRIGHT FELLOWSHIP for OUTSTANDING WOMEN in SCIENCE Application for Academic Year 2014-2015 The Jo Rae Wright Fellowship for Outstanding Women in Science was created in memory the deadline published online will not be accepted. #12;Revised October 2013 JO RAE WRIGHT FELLOWSHIP (choose

Ferrari, Silvia

469

Table II: Technical Targets for Membranes: Automotive  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Technical targets for fuel cell membranes in automotive applications defined by the High Temperature Working Group (February 2003).

470

Space Conditioning Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This strategic plan document outlines the gaps, barriers, and opportunities identified by the Building America Space Conditioning Standing Technical Committee.

471

Table IV: Technical Targets for Membranes: Stationary  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"Technical targets for fuel cell membranes in stationary applications defined by the High Temperature Working Group (February 2003). "

472

Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency October 3, 2011 - 12:39pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy will save time and money in its environmental reviews of many proposed energy projects under revised regulations approved September 27, 2011, to implement the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The revisions focus on the Department's categorical exclusion provisions, and reflect the first update to these provisions in 15 years. A categorical exclusion applies to a class of actions that an agency has determined normally do not individually or cumulatively have a significant impact on the human environment. "Updating our NEPA rule allows us to accomplish our environmental reviews

473

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2005 , 2005 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Ella McNeil Office of Transportation, EM-11 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 2 Getting Started Getting Started * Establish an internal writing team, lead by EM: - Field Representatives - Naval Reactors - NNSA - RW * Kick-off on August 3 (conference call) * Second conference call on Sept. 8 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Writing team completes new draft of Manual 1/06 Begin informal DOE review of revised Manual (field, GC, PSOs) 2/06 (3 weeks) Comment resolution by writing team complete, provide draft to internal management for review 3/06 (2 weeks) Draft Manual is provided to SRGs

474

Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 ` Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Last Updated on January 11, 2013 Department/Agency Action Title/Citation Federal Register Notice(s) 2000 Department of Health and Human Services Revised NEPA Procedures Revised General Administration Manual, HHS Part 30, Environmental Protection Published for comment on January 11, 1999 (64 Federal Register [FR] 1655). Published as final procedures on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10229). Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior Notice of Availability of a Draft Agency Handbook on the National Environmental Policy Act Department Manual (DM) Part 516, Chapter 6: Managing the NEPA Process (Appendix 7) Published on April 20, 2000 (65 FR 21210) with

475

Microsoft Word - Creston-Bell Revision Sheet__final.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Revision Sheet DOE/EA-4406 Summary Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) released the Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) in April 2012 for public comment. BPA sent the Preliminary EA to agencies and interested parties. Notification that the EA was available and how to request a copy was sent to all others on the mailing list of potentially affected parties. BPA received six comments and responded to these comments in this revision sheet. This revision sheet documents the changes to be incorporated into the EA. The Preliminary EA, with the addition of these changes, constitutes the Final EA, which will not be reprinted.

476

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 August 29, 2013 - 4:19pm Addthis Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 The "Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, Standard Form 312" (SF 312) was revised in July 2013 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to conform with two new federal statutes: The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act (Public Law 112-74); and Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (WPEA) (Public Law 112-199). The WPEA strengthens protections for federal employees who disclose evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse. The WPEA requires that each agreement

477

Transuranic waste characterization sampling and analysis methods manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Methods Manual provides a unified source of information on the sampling and analytical techniques that enable Department of Energy (DOE) facilities to comply with the requirements established in the current revision of the Transuranic Waste Characterization Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Transuranic (TRU) Waste Characterization Program (the Program) and the WIPP Waste Analysis Plan. This Methods Manual includes all of the testing, sampling, and analytical methodologies accepted by DOE for use in implementing the Program requirements specified in the QAPP and the WIPP Waste Analysis Plan. The procedures in this Methods Manual are comprehensive and detailed and are designed to provide the necessary guidance for the preparation of site-specific procedures. With some analytical methods, such as Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, the Methods Manual procedures may be used directly. With other methods, such as nondestructive characterization, the Methods Manual provides guidance rather than a step-by-step procedure. Sites must meet all of the specified quality control requirements of the applicable procedure. Each DOE site must document the details of the procedures it will use and demonstrate the efficacy of such procedures to the Manager, National TRU Program Waste Characterization, during Waste Characterization and Certification audits.

Suermann, J.F.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

Hanford Facility dangerous waste permit application, general information. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The current Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) and a treatment, storage, and/or disposal Unit-Specific Portion, which includes documentation for individual TSD units (e.g., document numbers DOE/RL-89-03 and DOE/RL-90-01). Both portions consist of a Part A division and a Part B division. The Part B division consists of 15 chapters that address the content of the Part B checklists prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology 1987) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (40 Code of Federal Regulations 270), with additional information requirements mandated by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 and revisions of Washington Administrative Code 173-303. For ease of reference, the Washington State Department of Ecology checklist section numbers, in brackets, follow the chapter headings and subheadings. Documentation contained in the General Information Portion (i.e., this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) is broader in nature and applies to all treatment, storage, and/or disposal units for which final status is sought. Because of its broad nature, the Part A division of the General Information Portion references the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Part A Permit Application (document number DOE/RL-88-21), a compilation of all Part A documentation for the Hanford Facility.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

NV/YMP radiological control manual, Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nevada Test Site (NTS) and the adjacent Yucca Mountain Project (YMP) are located in Nye County, Nevada. The NTS has been the primary location for testing nuclear explosives in the continental US since 1951. Current activities include operating low-level radioactive and mixed waste disposal facilities for US defense-generated waste, assembly/disassembly of special experiments, surface cleanup and site characterization of contaminated land areas, and non-nuclear test operations such as controlled spills of hazardous materials at the hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Spill Center (HSC). Currently, the major potential for occupational radiation exposure is associated with the burial of low-level nuclear waste and the handling of radioactive sources. Planned future remediation of contaminated land areas may also result in radiological exposures. The NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual, Revision 2, represents DOE-accepted guidelines and best practices for implementing Nevada Test Site and Yucca Mountain Project Radiation Protection Programs in accordance with the requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835, Occupational Radiation Protection. These programs provide protection for approximately 3,000 employees and visitors annually and include coverage for the on-site activities for both personnel and the environment. The personnel protection effort includes a DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program accredited dosimetry and personnel bioassay programs including in-vivo counting, routine workplace air sampling, personnel monitoring, and programmatic and job-specific As Low as Reasonably Achievable considerations.

Gile, A.L. [comp.] [comp.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Developing DOE Technical Standards, TSPP-4  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-2013 4-2013 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS September 2013 PROGRAM PROCEDURES DEVELOPING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-4-2013 Developing September 2013 DOE Technical Standards Program CONTENTS 1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 1 2. DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................... 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Initiating DOE Technical Standards, TSPP-2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-2013 2-2013 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS September 2013 PROGRAM PROCEDURES INITIATING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-2-2013 Initiating September 2013 DOE Technical Standards Program CONTENTS 1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 1 2. ESTABLISHING THE NEED .......................................................................................................... 1

482

Maintaining DOE Technical Standards, TSPP-7  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-2013 7-2013 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS September 2013 PROGRAM PROCEDURES MAINTAINING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7-2013 Maintaining September 2013 DOE Technical Standards Program CONTENTS 1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 1 2. DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 1

483

Owyhee Subbasin Plan Chapter 2 Technical Assessment  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Assessment. Steven C. Vigg, Editor. Final Draft. Submitted to the Northwest Power and ConservationOwyhee Subbasin Plan Chapter 2 Technical Assessment Prepared By: The Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Program. #12;Owyhee Subbasin Plan Chapter 2 OSP Technical Assessment Final Draft May 28, 2004i Document

484

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300 Arlington are pleased to transmit a technical report prepared by the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board. Based on its review of data gathered by the DOE and the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses

485

DOE Technical Standards Program: Online Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Online Approved DOE Technical Standards Online Approved DOE Technical Standards No. 1001 – 2000 No. 3001 – 4000 No. 4001 – 5500 No. 5501 – 6000 No. 6001 – 6500 No. 7501 – 7750 Document Number Range 1001 – 2000 Number Title DOE-HDBK-1001-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors (80 pages) PDF (226 KB) DOE-HDBK-1002-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators (70 pages) PDF (311 KB) DOE-HDBK-1003-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel (106 pages) PDF (391 KB) DOE-HDBK-1010-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Classical Physics (142 pages) PDF (1120 KB) DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Electrical Science, Volume 1 of 4 (166 pages) PDF (4255 KB)

486

Final Scientific/Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The overall goal of this project was to establish an education and training program in biobased products at Iowa State University (ISU). In particular, a graduate program in Biorenewable Resources and Technology (BRT) was to be established as a way of offering students advanced study in the use of plant- and crop-based resources in the production of biobased products. The program was to include three fundamental elements: an academic program, a research program, and industrial interactions. The academic program set out to introduce a new graduate major in Biorenewable Resources and Technology. Unlike other schools, which only offer certificates or areas of emphasis in biobased products, Iowa State University offers both M.S. and Ph.D degrees through its graduate program. Core required courses in Biorenewable Resources and Technology include a foundation course entitled Fundamentals of Biorenewable Resources (BRT 501); a seminar course entitled Biobased Products Seminar (BRT 506); a laboratory course, and a special topics laboratory course. The foundation course is a three-credit course introducing students to basic concepts in biorenewable resources and technology. The seminar course provides students with an opportunity to hear from nationally and internationally recognized leaders in the field. The laboratory requirement is a 1-credit laboratory course or a special topics laboratory/research experience (BRT 591L). As part of student recruitment, quarter-time assistantships from DOE funds were offered to supplement assistantships provided by faculty to students. Research was built around platform teams in an effort to encourage interdisciplinary research and collaborative student learning in biorenewable resources. A platform is defined as the convergence of enabling technologies into a highly integrated system for transforming a specific feedstock into desired products. The platform teams parallel the way industry conducts research and product development. Platform teams organize faculty and students for cross-disciplinary, systems-oriented research and collaborative learning. To date, nine platforms have been developed, although these will most likely be reorganized into a smaller number of broader topics. In the spring of 2004, BRT faculty initiated a regional partnership and collaborative learning program with colleagues at the University of Minnesota, Kansas State University, and South Dakota State University to develop distance education courses in biorenewable resources and technology. As a fledgling graduate program, the BRT graduate program didn’t have the breadth of resources to offer a large number of courses in biorenewables. Other schools faced a similar problem. The academic consortium as first conceived would allow students from the member schools to enroll in biorenewables courses from any of the participating schools, which would assure the necessary enrollment numbers to offer specialized course work. Since its inception, the collaborative curriculum partnership has expanded to include Louisiana State University and the University of Wisconsin. A second international curriculum development campaign was also initiated in the spring of 2004. In particular, several BRT faculty teamed with colleagues at the University of Arkansas, University of Washington, University of Gent (Belgium), National Polytechnic Institute of Toulouse (France), and Technical University of Graz (Austria) to develop an EU-US exchange program in higher education and vocational education/training (entitled “Renewable Resources and Clean Technology”).

Brown, R. C.; McCarley, T. M.

2006-05-04T23:59:59.000Z

487

Roadmap: Technical and Applied Studies -Computer Technology General -Bachelor of Technical and Applied Studies  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Roadmap: Technical and Applied Studies - Computer Technology General - Bachelor of Technical;Roadmap: Technical and Applied Studies - Computer Technology General - Bachelor of Technical and Applied-Mar-14/JSK This roadmap is a recommended semester-by-semester plan of study for this major. However

Khan, Javed I.

488

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 457.1, Nuclear Counterterrorism  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Intent is to revise DOE O 457.1 and include the content of DOE M 457.1-1 as appendices to the revised order.

2013-02-07T23:59:59.000Z

489

Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Questions concerning this...

490

POLICY FLASH 2014-25 Revision to the Procurement Strategy Panel...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

5 Revision to the Procurement Strategy Panel (PSP) Briefing Process POLICY FLASH 2014-25 Revision to the Procurement Strategy Panel (PSP) Briefing Process For DOE questions...

491

EIS-0288-S1: Revision to EPA Notice of Availability Draft Supplemental...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

288-S1: Revision to EPA Notice of Availability Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0288-S1: Revision to EPA Notice of Availability Draft Supplemental...

492

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the past decades, considerable theoretical efforts have been devoted to studying the electronic and geometric structures and related properties of surfaces. Such efforts are particularly important for systems like the actinides for which experimental work is relatively difficult to perform due to material problems and toxicity. The actinides are characterized by a gradual filling of the 5f-electron shell with the degree of localization increasing with the atomic number Z along the last series of the periodic table. The open shell of the 5f electrons determines the atomic, molecular, and solid state properties of the actinide elements and their compounds and understanding the quantum mechanics of the 5f electrons is the defining issue in the chemistry and physics of actinide elements. These elements are also characterized by the increasing prominence of relativistic effects and their studies can, in fact, help us understand the role of relativity throughout the periodic table. However, the electronic and geometric structures of the actinides, specifically the trans-uranium actinides and the roles of the 5f electrons in chemical bonding are still not well understood. This is crucial not only for our understanding of the actinides but also for the fact that the actinides constitute 'the missing link' between the d transition elements and the lanthanides. The 5f orbitals have properties intermediate between those of localized 4f and delocalized 3d orbitals. Thus, a proper understanding of the actinides will help us understand the behavior of the lanthanides and transition metals as well. In fact, there is an urgent need for continued extensive and detailed theoretical research in this area to provide significant and deep understandings of the electronic and geometric structures of the actinides. In this work, we have performed electronic structure studies for plutonium (Pu), americium (Am), and curium (Cm) surfaces, and molecular adsorptions on Pu and Am surfaces. In particular, the region at the boundary of Pu and Am, is widely believed to be the crossover region between d-like itinerant and f-like localized behavior The eventual goal is a complete understanding of the surface chemistry and physics processes of all actinide surfaces, defining the chemistry and physics of such heavy elements. Among the actinides, plutonium, with five 5f electrons in the solid state, is arguably the most complex, fascinating, and enigmatic element known to mankind and has attracted extraordinary scientific and technological interests because of its unique properties, generating a significant body of research in diverse areas, including superconductivity. Pu has, at least, six stable allotropes between room temperature and melting at atmospheric pressure, indicating that the valence electrons can hybridize into a number of complex bonding arrangements. Central and critical questions relate to the electronic structure, localization of the 5f electrons and the magnetism of Pu. For the light-actinides, from Th to Pu, the 5f electrons are believed to be delocalized, hybridizing with the 6d and 7s electrons. For the heavier actinides, Am and beyond, the 5f electrons are localized with the 5f orbitals progressively lower in energy relative to the 6d configuration. Hence, Pu is in a position where the 5f electronic behavior changes from itinerant to localized. As far as magnetism is concerned, a majority of the theoretical calculations continues to claim the existence of magnetism while almost all the experimental results do not find any support for such claims. The second element of interest to us, namely americium, occupies a central position in the actinide series with respect to the involvement of 5f electrons in metallic bonding. It is widely believed that the 5f electrons in Am are localized and that Am undergoes a series of crystallographic phase changes with pressure. Fully-relativistic all electron surface studies of the different phases of Am, initially for the dhcp and the fcc surfaces, can and have provided us with valuable informa

Dr. Asok K. Ray

2012-05-22T23:59:59.000Z

493

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The following report contributes to our knowledge of how to economically produce wildlife-friendly grass mixtures for future fuel feedstocks in the northern plains. It investigates northern-adapted cultivars; management and harvest regimes that are good for yields, soils and wildlife; comparative analysis of monocultures and simple mixtures of native grasses; economic implications of growing grasses for fuel feedstocks in specific locations in the northern plains; and conversion options for turning the grasses into useful chemicals and fuels. The core results of this study suggest the following: ? Native grasses, even simple grass mixtures, can be produced profitably in the northern plains as far west as the 100th meridian with yields ranging from 2 to 6 tons per acre. ? Northern adapted cultivars may yield less in good years, but have much greater long-term sustainable yield potential than higher-yielding southern varieties. ? Grasses require very little inputs and stop economically responding to N applications above 56kg/hectare. ? Harvesting after a killing frost may reduce the yield available in that given year but will increase overall yields averaged throughout multiple years. ? Harvesting after a killing frost or even in early spring reduces the level of ash and undesirable molecules like K which cause adverse reactions in pyrolysis processing. Grasses can be managed for biomass harvest and maintain or improve overall soil-health and carbon sequestration benefits of idled grassland ? The carbon sequestration activity of the grasses seems to follow the above ground health of the biomass. In other words plots where the above ground biomass is regularly removed can continue to sequester carbon at the rate of 2 tons/acre/year if the stand health is strong and yielding significant amounts of biomass. ? Managing grasses for feedstock quality in a biomass system requires some of the same management strategies as managing for wildlife benefit. We believe that biomass development can be done in such a way that also maximizes or improves upon conservation and other environmental goals (in some cases even when compared to idled land). ? Switchgrass and big bluestem work well together in simple mixture plots where big bluestem fills in around the switchgrass which alone grows in bunches and leaves patches of bare soil open and susceptible to erosion. ? Longer-term studies in the northern plains may also find that every other year harvest schemes produce as much biomass averaged over the years as annual harvests ? Grasses can be grown for between $23 and $54/ton in the northern plains at production rates between 3 and 5 tons/acre. ? Land costs, yields, and harvest frequency are the largest determining factors in the farm scale economics. Without any land rent offset or incentive for production, and with annual harvesting, grass production is likely to be around $35/ton in the northern plains (farm gate). ? Average transportation costs range from $3 to $10/ton delivered to the plant gate. Average distance from the plant is the biggest factor - $3/ton at 10 miles, $10/ton at 50 miles. ? There is a substantial penalty paid on a per unit of energy produced basis when one converts grasses to bio-oil, but the bio-oil can then compete in higher priced fuel markets whereas grasses alone compete directly with relatively cheap coal. ? Bio oil or modified bio-oil (without the HA or other chemical fraction) is a suitable fuel for boiler and combustion turbines that would otherwise use residual fuel oil or number 2 diesel. ? Ensyn has already commercialized the use of HA in smokey flavorants for the food industry but that market is rather small. HA, however, is also found to be a suitable replacement for the much larger US market for ethanolamines and ethalyne oxides that are used as dispersants. ? Unless crude oil prices rise, the highest and best use of grass based bio-oil is primarily as a direct fuel. As prices rise, HA, phenol and other chemical fractions may become more attractive ? Although we were

Sara Bergan, Executive Director; Brendan Jordan, Program Manager; Subcontractors as listed on the report.

2007-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

494

Codes and Standards: Hydrogen Fuel Purity Specifications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Codes and Standards: Codes and Standards: Hydrogen Fuel Purity Specifications Walter F. Podolski Fuel Purity Workshop Los Angeles, CA April 26, 2004 ChevronTexaco ConocoPhillips EXONMobil FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership Organizational Structure Codes and Standards for Commercial Hydrogen/Fuel Cell Vehicles Goal is to support commercialization decision in the 2015 timeframe * Ensure acceptability to all stake-holders - Regulators, insurers, public * Enable commercial feasibility * Facilitate rapid introduction of technical advances Issues * What we want to avoid - Premature Standards, Codes, and Regulations that slow introduction of new technologies - Competing national and international SDOs and professional organizations * What we want to encourage - Flexible guidelines that enable demonstration

495

Fig 9-revised Flowchart.xls  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Soil Nature and Extent AOI Identification Process d The PRG value for lead is not a calculated PRG, but rather is taken from the EPA guidance document Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Correction Action Facilities (1994). e For surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft), WRW surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft) PRGs are used. For subsurface soil (0.5 ft to a maximum depth of 209 ft), WRW subsurface soil (0.5 to 8 ft) PRGs are used. a Soil "superset" for soil samples collected from June 28, 1991 through August 22, 2005. c Soil PRGs are defined as 1 x 10 -6 WRW PRGs based on using an HI of 0.1 or a risk of 1 x 10 -6 (the more conservative of the two values was used for the PRG). b Background level is defined as the background M2SD. RI-Ready Soil Data

496

A Review of Criticality Accidents 2000 Revision  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Criticality accidents and the characteristics of prompt power excursions are discussed. Sixty accidental power excursions are reviewed. Sufficient detail is provided to enable the reader to understand the physical situation, the chemistry and material flow, and when available the administrative setting leading up to the time of the accident. Information on the power history, energy release, consequences, and causes are also included when available. For those accidents that occurred in process plants, two new sections have been included in this revision. The first is an analysis and summary of the physical and neutronic features of the chain reacting systems. The second is a compilation of observations and lessons learned. Excursions associated with large power reactors are not included in this report.

Thomas P. McLaughlin; Shean P. Monahan; Norman L. Pruvost; Vladimir V. Frolov; Boris G. Ryazanov; Victor I. Sviridov

2000-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

497

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2001 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 2001 May 2001 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2001 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - May 2001 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated......................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation.......... 1 Proposed Cancellation of DOE Technical Standards............. 2 Published DOE Technical Standards..................................... 3 American National Standards Institute................................... 3 American National Standards................................................ 6 American Society for Testing and Materials............................ 6 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2001 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2000 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2000

498

Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electric System Working Group Technical Conference - Comments and Recommendations Blackout 2003: Electric System Working Group Technical Conference - Comments and Recommendations...

499

Supporting documentation for the 1997 revision to the DOE Insulation Fact Sheet  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) Insulation Fact Sheet has been revised to reflect developments in energy conservation technology and the insulation market. A nationwide insulation cost survey was made by polling insulation contractors and builders, and the results are reported here. These costs, along with regional weather data, regional fuel costs, and fuel-specific system efficiencies were used to produce recommended insulation levels for new and existing houses. This repor