Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Standard technical specifications, Westinghouse Plants: Bases (Sections 2.0--3.3). Volume 2, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This NUREG contains the improved Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Westinghouse plants. Revision 1 incorporates the cumulative changes to Revision 0, which was published in September 1992. The changes reflected in Revision 1 resulted from the experience gained from license amendment applications to convert to these improved STS or to adopt partial improvements to existing technical specifications. This NUREG is the result of extensive public technical meetings and discussions between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and various nuclear power plant licensees, Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) Owners Groups, specifically the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG), NSSS vendors, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). The improved STS were developed based on the criteria in the Final Commission Policy Statement on Technical Specifications Improvements for Nuclear Power Reactors, dated July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132). Licensees are encouraged to upgrade their technical specifications consistent with those criteria and conforming, to the extent practical and consistent with the licensing basis for the facility, to Revision 1 to the improved STS. The Commission continues to place the highest priority on requests for complete conversions to the improved STS. Licensees adopting portions of the improved STS to existing technical specifications should adopt all related requirements, as applicable, to achieve a high degree of standardization and consistency.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

2

Standard technical specifications - Babcock and Wilcox Plants: Bases (Sections 2.0-3.3). Volume 2, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This NUREG contains the improved Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) plants. Revision 1 incorporates the cumulative changes to Revision 0, which was published in September 1992. The changes reflected in Revision 1 resulted from the experience gained from license amendment applications to convert to these improved STS or to adopt partial improvements to existing technical specifications. This NUREG is the result of extensive public technical meetings and discussions between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and various nuclear power plant licensees, Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) Owners Groups, specifically the B&W Owners Group (BWOG), NSSS vendors, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). The improved STS were developed based on the criteria in the Final Commission Policy Statement on Technical Specifications Improvements for Nuclear Power Reactors, dated July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132). Licensees are encouraged to upgrade their technical specifications consistent with those criteria and conforming, to the extent practical and consistent with the licensing basis for the facility, to Revision 1 to the improved STS. The Commission continues to place the highest priority on requests for complete conversions to the improved STS. Licensees adopting portions of the improved STS to existing technical specifications should adopt all related requirements, as applicable, to achieve a high degree of standardization and consistency.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

Proposed Technical Specification Amendment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This letter provides the final revised Technical Specification (TS) pages for the subject proposed TS amendment. In Reference 1 Duke Energy requested an amendment to the Catawba Nuclear Station Facility Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications (TS). The proposed amendment revises various TS that are affected by the revised heatup, cooldown, critically, and inservice test pressure and temperature (P/T) limits for the reactor coolant system (RCS) of each unit. The proposed amendment also revised the TS requirements for the low temperature overpressure protection (LTOP) system for each unit. www. duke-energy. corn

D. M. Jamil; Duke Power

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Summary of the technical specifications of the geothermal power plants in the world: revision 1. Report no. CATMEC/21  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Worldwide geothermal power plant installed capacity is listed by country with year of startup. Tables containing technical data are given for each of the geothermal power units installed in the world and for some of those under construction or in planning. The data cover the primary mechanical areas of the power station including the turbine, condenser, gas extraction system, and heat extraction system. In the case of plants which are in the planning stage or under construction, the plant design specifications are listed but must be viewed as preliminary. (MHR)

DiPippo, R.

1978-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

eGSE America: Electric Aircraft Cargo Conveyor Technical Specification  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EACC Technical Specifications EACC Technical Specifications eGSE America: Electric Aircraft Cargo Conveyor (EACC) Technical Specifications Revision 00 August 2005 Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications eGSE America: EACC Technical Specifications 1.0 SCOPE: This document outlines the design and performance requirements for a battery- powered, self propelled belt conveyor for handling baggage and cargo at aircraft bulk cargo holds. The use of "shall" in this document indicates a mandatory requirement. The use of "should" indicates a recommendation or that which is advised but not required. 2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS: Portions of the following documents to the extent specified herein are a part of this Recommended Practice.

6

Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

EPRI has assessed the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in the regulation of nuclear power plant technical specifications. This report presents nuclear utilities with a framework and associated general guidance for implementing risk managed technical specifications (RMTS) as a partial replacement of existing technical specifications. This report was prepared for EPRI with extensive technical input and review by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Risk-Informed Technical Specifications Task Force...

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

POLICY STATEMENT ON TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received two lettertype reports from its independent Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. They provide comments on a draft final policy statement on technical specifications improvements for nuclear power plants and additional implementation information for the NRC's regulation on requirements for the renewal of operating licenses for power reactors. The ACRS also sent a letter report to the NRC's Executive Director for Operations that provides comments on the NRC staff's proposed rule on advanced light water reactor severe accident performance. Attachments:

unknown authors

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

8

Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has assessed the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in the regulation of nuclear power station Technical Specifications. This report presents nuclear utilities with a framework and associated general guidance for implementing Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) as a partial replacement for existing Technical Specifications. This report was prepared for EPRI with extensive technical input and review by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Risk-I...

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

Central Solenoid Insert Technical Specification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US ITER Project Office (USIPO) is responsible for the ITER central solenoid (CS) contribution to the ITER project. The Central Solenoid Insert (CSI) project will allow ITER validation the appropriate lengths of the conductors to be used in the full-scale CS coils under relevant conditions. The ITER Program plans to build and test a CSI to verify the performance of the CS conductor. The CSI is a one-layer solenoid with an inner diameter of 1.48 m and a height of 4.45 m between electric terminal ends. The coil weight with the terminals is approximately 820 kg without insulation. The major goal of the CSI is to measure the temperature margin of the CS under the ITER direct current (DC) operating conditions, including determining sensitivity to load cycles. Performance of the joints, ramp rate sensitivity, and stability against thermal or electromagnetic disturbances, electrical insulation, losses, and instrumentation are addressed separately and therefore are not major goals in this project. However, losses and joint performance will be tested during the CSI testing campaign. The USIPO will build the CSI that will be tested at the Central Solenoid Model Coil (CSMC) Test Facility at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Naka, Japan. The industrial vendors (the Suppliers) will report to the USIPO (the Company). All approvals to proceed will be issued by the Company, which in some cases, as specified in this document, will also require the approval of the ITER Organization. Responsibilities and obligations will be covered by respective contracts between the USIPO, called Company interchangeably, and the industrial Prime Contractors, called Suppliers. Different stages of work may be performed by more than one Prime Contractor, as described in this specification. Technical requirements of the contract between the Company and the Prime Contractor will be covered by the Fabrication Specifications developed by the Prime Contractor based on this document and approved by the Company and ITER. The Fabrication Specifications may reflect some national requirements and regulations that are not fully provided here. This document presents the ITER CSI specifications.

Martovetsky, Nicolai N [ORNL; Smirnov, Alexandre [ORNL

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Urban Electric Vehicle (UEV) Technical Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 UEV AMERICA January 1, 2003 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (14) The controllerinverter shall control the minimum traction battery discharge voltage to prevent degradation...

11

Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Technical requirements specification for tank waste retrieval  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides the technical requirements specification for the retrieval of waste from the underground storage tanks at the Hanford Site. All activities covered by this scope are conducted in support of the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) mission.

Lamberd, D.L.

1996-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

13

Alloy 690 Procurement Specification - Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The metallurgical characteristics of Alloy 690 can play a role in its resistance to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) propensity and UT inspectibility. This specification guideline was created to provide guidance on the procurement of Alloy 690 to ensure that it has the metallurgical characteristics to optimize its PWSCC resistance and eliminate microstructure which could affect the Ultrasonic test (UT) inspectability of the material. The Alloy 690 procurement specification guideline ...

2012-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

14

Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines: Technical Update to EPRI Interim Development Report 1002965  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has assessed the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in the regulation of nuclear power plant technical specifications. This report presents nuclear utilities with one example of a technical framework and associated general guidance for implementation of risk-managed technical specifications (RMTS) as a partial replacement of existing conventional plant technical specifications. This report was prepared by EPRI and the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) f...

2004-12-11T23:59:59.000Z

15

Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4687 4687 Revised August 2009 Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages D.R. Roberts and R. Anderson National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-550-44687 Revised August 2009 Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages D.R. Roberts and R. Anderson Prepared under Task No. BET88001 The addition of Appendix D is the only revision to the January 2009

16

Technical Repair Guidelines for Limitorque Model SMB-000 Valve Actuators: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This technical repair guide (TRG) for Limitorque motor-operated valve (MOV) actuator model SMB-000 is the first in a series of documents devoted to the comprehensive maintenance and repair of Limitorque actuators. This guide provides instructions for engineering, operations, and maintenance personnel on MOV actuator repair, maintenance, adjustment, and troubleshooting methods. Originally published in 1989, this document has now been thoroughly revised (Revision 1) to incorporate new information and techn...

1994-10-02T23:59:59.000Z

17

Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines: Interim Development Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents nuclear utilities with a technical framework and associated general guidance for implementation of risk-managed technical specifications (RMTS) as a partial replacement for existing conventional plant technical specifications. This interim report, intended for both Westinghouse and non-Westinghouse reactor plants and for future reference and application by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), will probably be updated in the future as risk-informed applications technology continues to ...

2003-11-21T23:59:59.000Z

18

Program distribution for unclassified scientific and technical reports: Instructions and category scope notes: Revision 75  

SciTech Connect

The DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) in conjunction with DOE Program Offices establishes distribution categories for research, development, and technological reports emanating from DOE programs. The revised category numbers and scope notes contained in this publication were coordinated between OSTI and DOE Program Offices with input from DOE Field Offices. Decisions regarding whether reports will be distributed are made by Program Offices in conjunction with DOE Field Offices and OSTI. This revision of DOE/OSTI-4500 contains the revised distribution category numbers and scope notes along with the printed copy requirement, which shows the number of copies required to make program distribution.

Simpson, W.F. Jr.; Amburn, D. (eds.)

1989-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Technical assessment of TRUSAF for compliance with work place air sampling. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this Technical Work Document is to satisfy WHC-CM-1-6, the ``WHC Radiological Control Manual.`` This first revision of the original Supporting Document covers the period from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994. WHC-CM-1-6 is the primary guidance for radiological control at Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). As such, it complies with Title 10, Part 835 of the Code of Federal Regulations. In addition to WHC-CM-1-6, there is HSRCM-1, the ``Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual`` and several Department of Energy (DOE) Orders, national consensus standards, and reports that provide criteria, standards, and requirements for workplace air sampling programs. This document provides a summary of these, as they apply to WHC facility workplace air sampling programs. this document also provides an evaluation of the compliance of the TRUSAF workplace air sampling program to the criteria, standards, and requirements and documents. Where necessary, it also indicates changes needed to bring specific locations into compliance.

Butler, J.D.

1995-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

20

UMTRA technical assistance contractor Quality Assurance Program Plan. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

This Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) provides the primary requirements for the integration of quality functions into all Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC) Project organization activities. The QAPP is the written directive authorized by the TAC Program Manager to accomplish this task and to implement procedures that provide the controls and sound management practices needed to ensure TAC contractual obligations are met. The QA program is designed to use monitoring, audit, and surveillance functions as management tools to ensure that all Project organization functions are executed in a manner that will protect public health and safety, promote the success of the Project, and meet or exceed contract requirements. The key to ensuring compliance with this directive is a two-step professional approach: utilize the quality system in all areas of activity, and generate a personal commitment from all personnel to provide quality service. The quality staff will be experienced, trained professionals capable of providing maximum flexibility to Project goal attainment. Such flexibility will enable the staff to be more cost effective and to further improve communication and coordination. To provide control details, this QAPP will be supplemented by approved standard operating procedures that provide requirements for performing the various TAC quality-related activities. These procedures shall describe applicable design input and document control activities and documentation.

Pehrson, P.

1993-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

PVUSA model technical specification for a turnkey photovoltaic power system  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

One of the five objectives of PVUSA is to offer U.S. utilities hands-on experience in designing, procuring, and operating PV systems. The procurement process included the development of a detailed set of technical requirements for a PV system. PVUSA embodied its requirements in a technical specification used as an attachment to its contracts for four utility-scale PV systems in the 200 kW to 500 kW range. The technical specification has also been adapted and used by several utilities. The PVUSA Technical Specification has now been updated and is presented here as a Model Technical Specification (MTS) for utility use. The MTS text is also furnished on a computer disk in Microsoft Word 6.0 so that it may be conveniently adapted by each user. The text includes guidance in the form of comments and by the use of parentheses to indicate where technical information must be developed and inserted. Commercial terms and conditions will reflect the procurement practice of the buyer. The reader is referred to PG&E Report Number 95-3090000. 1, PVUSA Procurement, Acceptance and Rating Practices for Photovoltaic Power Plants (1995) for PVUSA experience and practice. The MTS is regarded by PVUSA as a use-proven document, but needs to be adapted with care and attention to detail.

Dows, R.N.; Gough, E.J.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

22

HYDROGEN GENERATION FROM ELECTROLYSIS - REVISED FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

DOE GO13028-0001 DESCRIPTION/ABSTRACT This report is a summary of the work performed by Teledyne Energy Systems to understand high pressure electrolysis mechanisms, investigate and address safety concerns related to high pressure electrolysis, develop methods to test components and systems of a high pressure electrolyzer, and produce design specifications for a low cost high pressure electrolysis system using lessons learned throughout the project. Included in this report are data on separator materials, electrode materials, structural cell design, and dissolved gas tests. Also included are the results of trade studies for active area, component design analysis, high pressure hydrogen/oxygen reactions, and control systems design. Several key pieces of a high pressure electrolysis system were investigated in this project and the results will be useful in further attempts at high pressure and/or low cost hydrogen generator projects. An important portion of the testing and research performed in this study are the safety issues that are present in a high pressure electrolyzer system and that they can not easily be simplified to a level where units can be manufactured at the cost goals specified, or operated by other than trained personnel in a well safeguarded environment. The two key objectives of the program were to develop a system to supply hydrogen at a rate of at least 10,000 scf/day at a pressure of 5000psi, and to meet cost goals of $600/ kW in production quantities of 10,000/year. On these two points TESI was not successful. The project was halted due to concerns over safety of high pressure gas electrolysis and the associated costs of a system which reduced the safety concerns.

IBRAHIM, SAMIR; STICHTER, MICHAEL

2008-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

23

Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister System Performance Specification: Revision 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document provides specifications for selected system components of the Transportation, Aging and Disposal (TAD) canister-based system.

24

Training and qualification program for nuclear criticality safety technical staff. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

A training and qualification program for nuclear criticality safety technical staff personnel has been developed and implemented. All personnel who are to perform nuclear criticality safety technical work are required to participate in the program. The program includes both general nuclear criticality safety and plant specific knowledge components. Advantage can be taken of previous experience for that knowledge which is portable such as performance of computer calculations. Candidates step through a structured process which exposes them to basic background information, general plant information, and plant specific information which they need to safely and competently perform their jobs. Extensive documentation is generated to demonstrate that candidates have met the standards established for qualification.

Taylor, R.G.; Worley, C.A.

1997-03-05T23:59:59.000Z

25

January 13, 2012, Technical Qualification Program, Revision 3 - Sandia Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OF DOCUMENT: OF DOCUMENT: SANDIA SITE OFFICE COORDINATION/APPROVAL SSO CP 0603.03, Technical Qualification Program DESCRIPTION (e.g., summary of changes): Incorporated: (I) changes to governing order (DOE 0 426.1); (2) SSO FR T&Q and CT procedures; (3) recommendations from recent self-assessments. Chan ed re- ualification eriodicity from 3 to 5 ears. REVISION NO.: 3 DATE: 1/11/12 Subject Matter Expert (SME) (name, org., & phone): Allen D. Tate, AMNO 845-4050 COORDINATING/APPROVING ORDER SIGNATURE DATE ORGANIZATION & NAME SME Allen D. Tate Environment, Safety & Health Dan Pellegrino, Assistant Manager Facilities & Projects Mike McFadden, Assistant Manager Nuclear Operations Jim Todd, Assistant Manager, FTCP Agent Safeguards & Security

26

Technical Review Report for the Mound 1KW Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Addendum No. 1, through Revision b  

SciTech Connect

This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) staff, at the request of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), on the 'Mound 1KW Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging, Addendum No. 1, Revision b', dated May 2007 (Addendum 1). The Mound 1KW Package is certified by DOE Certificate of Compliance (CoC) number USA/9516/B(U)F-85 for the transportation of Type B quantities of plutonium heat source material. The safety analysis of the package is documented in the 'Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Mound 1KW Package' (i.e., the Mound 1KW SARP, or the SARP). Addendum 1 incorporates a new fueled capsule assembly payload. The following changes have been made to add this payload: (1) The primary containment vessel (PCV) will be of the same design, but will increase in height to 11.16 in.; (2) A new graphite support block will be added to support up to three fueled capsule assemblies per package; (3) The cutting groove height on the secondary containment vessel (SCV) will be heightened to accommodate the taller PCV; and (4) A 3.38 in. high graphite filler block will be placed on top of the PCV. All other packaging features, as described in the Mound 1KW SARP [3], remain unchanged. This report documents the LLNL review of Addendum 1[1]. The specific review for each SARP Chapter is documented herein.

DiSabatino, A; West, M; Hafner, R; Russell, E

2007-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

27

Recommendations for the treatment of aging in standard technical specifications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Nuclear Plant Aging Research Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) evaluated the standard technical specifications for nuclear power plants to determine whether the current surveillance requirements (SRs) were effective in detecting age-related degradation. Nuclear Plant Aging Research findings for selected systems and components were reviewed to identify the stressors and operative aging mechanisms and to evaluate the methods available to detect, differentiate, and trend the resulting aging degradation. Current surveillance and testing requirements for these systems and components were reviewed for their effectiveness in detecting degraded conditions and for potential contributions to premature degradation. When the current surveillance and testing requirements appeared ineffective in detecting aging degradation or potentially could contribute to premature degradation, a possible deficiency in the SRs was identified that could result in undetected degradation. Based on this evaluation, PNL developed recommendations for inspection, surveillance, trending, and condition monitoring methods to be incorporated in the SRs to better detect age- related degradation of these selected systems and components.

Orton, R.D.; Allen, R.P.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Risk-Managed Technical Specifications - Lessons Learned from Initial Application at South Texas Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes research that documents lessons learned from the initial year of implementation of Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) at South Texas Project (STP).

2008-12-11T23:59:59.000Z

29

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub o}-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for ``group R`` residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

30

Technical support document for proposed revision of the model energy code thermal envelope requirements  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the council of American Building Officials' (CABO) 1993 supplement to the 1992 Model Energy Code (MEC) (referred to as the 1993 MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for single-family and low-rise multifamily residences. The goal of this analysis was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determined the most cost-effective (least total life-cycle cost [LCC]) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for residences in different locations. The ECMs with the lowest LCC were used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U[sub o]-value (thermal transmittance) curves in the MEC format. The changes proposed here affect the requirements for group R'' residences. The group R residences are detached one- and two-family dwellings (referred to as single-family) and all other residential buildings three stories or less (referred to as multifamily).

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

Risk-Based Evaluation of Technical Specification Problems at the La Salle County Nuclear Station  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In evaluating three technical specifications for a Commonwealth Edison Company plant, a new analytic methodology identified alternative strategies that presented fewer operating problems. Moreover, the alternatives offered equal or greater safety benefits.

1987-07-08T23:59:59.000Z

32

Technical support document for proposed 1994 revision of the MEC thermal envelope requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the development of the proposed revision of the Council of American Building Officials` (CABO) 1994 supplement to the 1993 Model Energy Code (MEC) building thermal envelope requirements for maximum component U{sub 0}-value. The 1994 amendments to the 1993 MEC were established in last year`s code change cycle and did not change the envelope requirements. The research underlying the proposed MEC revision was conducted by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE) Building Energy Standards program. The goal of this research was to develop revised guidelines based on an objective methodology that determines the most cost-effective (least total cost) combination of energy conservation measures (ECMs) (insulation levels and window types) for residential buildings. This least-cost set of ECMs was used as a basis for proposing revised MEC maximum U{sub 0}-values (thermal transmittances). ECMs include window types (for example, double-pane vinyl) and insulation levels (for example, R-19) for ceilings, walls, and floors.

Conner, C.C.; Lucas, R.G.

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Record of Technical Change {number_sign}2 for ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 240: Area 25 Vehicle Washdown, Nevada Test Site, Nevada,'' Revision 0, DOE/NV--532  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Record of Technical Change updates the technical informatioin provided in ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 240: Area 25 Vehicle Washdown, Nevada Test Site, Nevada,'' Revision 0, DOE/NV--532.

USDOE Nevada Operations Office

2000-03-16T23:59:59.000Z

34

200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility operational test specification. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document identifies the test specification and test requirements for the 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (200 Area TEDF) operational testing activities. These operational testing activities, when completed, demonstrate the functional, operational and design requirements of the 200 Area TEDF have been met. The technical requirements for operational testing of the 200 Area TEDF are defined by the test requirements presented in Appendix A. These test requirements demonstrate the following: pump station No.1 and associated support equipment operate both automatically and manually; pump station No. 2 and associated support equipment operate both automatically and manually; water is transported through the collection and transfer lines to the disposal ponds with no detectable leakage; the disposal ponds accept flow from the transfer lines with all support equipment operating as designed; and the control systems operate and status the 200 Area TEDF including monitoring of appropriate generator discharge parameters.

Crane, A.F.

1995-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

35

Nuclear Criticality Safety Organization guidance for the development of continuing technical training. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Criticality Safety Organization (NCSO) is committed to developing and maintaining a staff of highly qualified personnel to meet the current and anticipated needs in nuclear criticality safety at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant and throughout the DOE complex. Continuing technical training is training outside of the initial qualification program to address identified organization-wide needs. Typically, this training is used to improve organization performance in the conduct of business. This document provides guidelines for the development of the technical portions of the Continuing Training Program. It is not a step-by-step procedure, but a collection of considerations to be used during the development process.

Carroll, K.J.; Taylor, R.G.; Worley, C.A.

1997-05-20T23:59:59.000Z

36

May 15, 2012, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting Â… Presentation: Status of FAQS revision  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 15, 2012 May 15, 2012 Jeanette Yarrington Process * Approve FAQS at 5-Year Intervals Identify Sponsor/POC and Revise FAQS FTCP Agents/DNFSB Staff Review Receive/Resolve Comments RevCom Process as Technical Standard Submit for DNFSB Staff Review FTCP Approval/CTA Concurrence Submit to TSP for Formal Posting FTCP Approval/CTA Concurrence Qualification Standard Sponsor/POC FTCP Agent Status Chemical Processing EM/Mike Mikolanis and Patricia Suggs Mike Mikolanis Complete - Approved 02/2010 Criticality Safety Idaho/Adolf Dary Newbry Complete - Approved 04/2009 Garcia and NA- SH/Jerry Hicks Environmental Compliance NA-173/Steve Black Mike Garcia Complete - Approved 06/2011 Facility Representative HSS/Earl Hughes Pat Worthington Complete - Approved 10/2010 *JTA needed Mechanical Systems Pantex/Terry

37

Resolution of National Academy of Sciences technical issues at N Reactor; Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of this report is to document the Westinghouse Hanford Company`s (Westinghouse Hanford) response documenting the scope required to address the 14 issues identified in the NAS/NAE technical recommendations that affect the N Reactor. The closure of the issues related to the N Reactor will provide the appropriate documentation to the DOE for certification of compliance.

Rainey, T.E.

1989-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

The future is yours--Get ready! Career options in scientific and technical fields. Revision  

SciTech Connect

This 50 page brochure was developed by Brookhaven National Laboratory to encourage high school students to begin considering careers in the scientific and technical fields. The topics of the brochure include career selection, career options, a review of training required for each occupation, a collection of profiles of BNL employees describing how they chose and prepared for their careers, a description of BNL educational programs for high school students, and profiles of some of the students participating in these programs.

Not Available

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

FFCAct Clearinghouse, directory of abstracts: Radioactive waste technical support program. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCAct) Clearinghouse is a card catalog of information about the FFCAct and its requirements for developing Site Treatment Plans (STP). The information available in the clearinghouse includes abstracts describing computer applications, technical reports, and a list of technical experts. This report contains 61 abstracts from the database relating to radioactive waste management. The clearinghouse includes information on characterization, retrieval, treatment, storage, and disposal elements of waste management as they relate to the FFCAct and the treatment of mixed wastes. Subject areas of information being compiled include: commercial treatment capabilities; listings of technical experts for assistance in selecting and evaluating treatment options and technologies; mixed waste data and treatability groups; guidance on STP development; life-cycle costs planning estimates for facilities; references to documentation on available technologies and technology development activities; Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) for treatment facilities; regulatory, health and safety issues associated with treatment facilities and technologies; and computer databases, applications, and models for identifying and evaluating treatment facilities and technologies. Access to the FFCAct clearinghouse is available to the DOE and its DOE contractors involved in STP development and other FFCAct activities.

NONE

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Technical evaluation report on the proposed design modifications and technical-specification changes on grid voltage degradation for the San Onofre Nuclear Genetating Station, Unit 1  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the technical evaluation of the proposed design modifications and Technical Specification changes for protection of Class 1E equipment from grid voltage degradation for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1. The review criteria are based on several IEEE standards and the Code of Federal Regulations. The evaluation finds that the proposed design modifications and Technical Specification changes will ensure that the Class 1E equipment will be protected from sustained voltage degradation.

Selan, J.C.

1982-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Revised Master Plan for the Hood River Production Program, Technical Report 2008.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Hood River Production Program (HRPP) is a Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) funded program initiated as a mitigation measure for Columbia River hydrosystem effects on anadromous fish. The HRPP began in the early 1990s with the release of spring Chinook and winter steelhead smolts into the basin. Prior to implementation, co-managers, including the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife drafted the Hood River Production Master Plan (O'Toole and ODFW 1991a; O'Toole and ODFW 1991b) and the Pelton Ladder Master Plan (Smith and CTWSR 1991). Both documents were completed in 1991 and subsequently approved by the Council in 1992 and authorized through a BPA-led Environmental Impact Statement in 1996. In 2003, a 10-year programmatic review was conducted for BPA-funded programs in the Hood River (Underwood et al. 2003). The primary objective of the HRPP Review (Review) was to determine if program goals were being met, and if modifications to program activities would be necessary in order to meet or revise program goals. In 2003, an agreement was signed between PacifiCorp and resource managers to remove the Powerdale Dam (RM 10) and associated adult trapping facility by 2010. The HRPP program has been dependant on the adult trap to collect broodstock for the hatchery programs; therefore, upon the dam's removal, some sort of replacement for the trap would be needed to continue the HRPP. At the same time the Hood River Subbasin Plan (Coccoli 2004) was being written and prompted the co-managers to considered future direction of the program. This included revising the numerical adult fish objectives based on the assimilated data and output from several models run on the Hood River system. In response to the Review as well as the Subbasin Plan, and intensive monitoring and evaluation of the current program, the HRPP co-managers determined the spring Chinook program was not achieving the HRPP's defined smolt-to-adult (SAR) survival rate guidelines. The observed low SAR was due to precocity, straying, and incidence of BKD in the spring Chinook program; which ultimately led to the program's inability to achieve the subbasin's overly optimistic biological fish objectives. The summer steelhead hatchery program was not providing the fishery or population benefits anticipated and will be discontinued. The winter steelhead program was performing as planned and no changes are foreseen. This updated Master Plan addresses the several proposed changes to the existing HRPP, which are described.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation

2008-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

42

NIST SP 800-126 Revision 1, The Technical Specification for ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Embedded CPE references cpe_dict http://cpe.mitre.org/dictionary/2.0 CPE Dictionaries cve http://scap.nist.gov/schema/vulnerability/0.4 ...

2012-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

43

NIST SP 800-126 Revision 2, The Technical Specification for ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... was created. dictionaries element – ds:dictionaries 0-1 Links to dictionary components (see Table 4). checklists element ...

2012-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

44

Technical evaluation report on the 120 Vac vital instrument buses and inverter Technical Specifications Issue B71  

SciTech Connect

The operation of a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) with one of its 120 Vac vital buses energized in an off-normal mode was analyzed. A Probabilistic Risk Assessment was made to determine the increment of risk by energizing a vital bus from an off-site source directly vs energizing it from its normal, uninterruptible source (i.e., a battery/inverter arrangement). The calculations were made based on uninterruptible source energized vital buses as the normal mode. The analysis indicated that a reduction in the incremental risk increase (caused by plant operation with a vital bus being energized in an off-normal mode) can be accomplished by limiting the time permitted in that condition. Currently, the time that a vital bus can be energized in the off-normal mode is not universally time-limited by plant Technical Specifications. Several alternatives for the reduction in incremental risk were examined and their value/impacts were derived. These data indicate that a recommendation be made for a Technical Specification time limitation of 72 hours per year for off-normal energizing a vital bus during operation of a PWR.

St. Leger-Barter, G.; White, R.L.

1982-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

45

Transfer of Air Force technical procurement bid set data to small businesses, using CALS and EDI. Summary report. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides a summary of the Air Force CALS Test Network (AFCTN) Test Report Transfer of Air Force Technical Procurement Bid Set Data to Small Businesses, Using CALS and EDI (AFCTN Test Report 94-034, UCRL-ID-118619). It represents a synthesis of the results, conclusions, and recommendations, as well as a more concise presentation of the issues and strategies as viewed from AFCTN`s perspective. This report documents a test transfer of three Air Force technical procurement bid sets to one large and twelve small businesses, using the Department of Defense (DoD) Continuous Acquisition and Life-cycle Support (CALS) and ANSI ASC X12 Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) standards. The main goal of the test was to evaluate the effectiveness of using CALS technical data within the context of the DoD`s EDI-based standard approach to electronic commerce in procurement, with particular emphasis on receipt and use of the data by small contractors. Air Force procurement data was provided by the Sacramento Air Logistics Center at McClellan Air Force Base; the manufacturing participants were selected from among McClellan`s {open_quote}Blue Ribbon{close_quote} contractors, located throughout the United States. The test was sponsored by the Air Force CALS Test Network, headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. The test successfully demonstrated the technical feasibility of including CALS MIL-R-28002 (Raster) engineering data in an EDI Specification/Technical Information transaction set (ANSI ASC X12 841) when issuing electronic requests for quotation to small businesses. In many cases, the data was complete enough for the contractor participant to feel comfortable generating a quote.

NONE

1995-01-10T23:59:59.000Z

46

JM to Revise DOE O 470.5, Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 470.5, Integrating Existing Technical Security Program Requirements  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This memorandum provides justification for the development of one integrated and consolidated set of req uirements for the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical ...

2013-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

47

Technical assessment of workplace air sampling requirements at tank farm facilities. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

WHC-CM-1-6 is the primary guidance for radiological control at Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). It was written to implement DOE N 5480.6 ``US Department of Energy Radiological Control Manual`` as it applies to programs at Hanford which are now overseen by WHC. As such, it complies with Title 10, Part 835 of the Code of Federal Regulations. In addition to WHC-CM-1-6, there is HSRCM-1, the ``Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual`` and several Department of Energy (DOE) Orders, national consensus standards, and reports that provide criteria, standards, and requirements for workplace air sampling programs. This document provides a summary of these, as they apply to WHC facility workplace air sampling programs. This document also provides an evaluation of the compliance of Tank Farms` workplace air sampling program to the criteria, standards, and requirements and documents compliance with the requirements where appropriate. Where necessary, it also indicates changes needed to bring specific locations into compliance.

Olsen, P.A.

1994-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

48

Technical Status Report: Preliminary Glass Formulation Report for INEEL HAW. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

Preliminary glass formulation work has been initiated at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and the Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC) to support immobilization efforts of Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) high activity waste (HAW). Based on current pretreatment flow sheet assumptions, several glasses were fabricated and tested using an average `All Blend` waste stream composition which is dominated by the presence of ZrO{sub 2} (i.e., approximately 80 wt percent). The results of this initial work show that immobilization via vitrification is a viable option for a specific INEEL HAW waste stream. Waste loadings of at least 19 wt percent can be achieved for the `All Blend` stream while maintaining targeted processing and product performance criteria. This waste loading translates into a ZrO{sub 2} content in excess of 15 wt percent in the final glass waste form. Frits developed for this work are based in the alkali borosilicate system. Although the results indicate that vitrification can be used to immobilize the `All Blend` waste stream, the glass compositions are by no means optimized.

Peeler, D. [Westinghouse Savannah River Company, AIKEN, SC (United States); Reamer, I.; Vienna, J.; Crum, J.A.

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

49

Technical Review Report for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Model 9977 S-SARP-G-00001 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This Technical Review Report (TRR) summarizes the review findings for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Model 9977 B(M)F-96 shipping container. The content analyzed for this submittal is Content Envelope C.1, Heat Sources, in assemblies of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators or food-pack cans. The SARP under review, i.e., S-SARP-G-00001, Revision 2 (August 2007), was originally referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package. The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's, Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9977 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. The Model 9977 Package design includes a single, 6-inch diameter, stainless steel pressure vessel containment system (i.e., the 6CV) that was designed and fabricated in accordance with Section III, Subsection NB, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. The earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, 9966, 9967 and 9968 Packages, were originally designed and certified in the 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with new safety requirements, based on International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, were proposed. The updated package designs were the Model 9972, 9973, 9974 and 9975 Packages, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. Differences between the Model 9975 Package and the Model 9977 Package include: (1) The lead shield present in the Model 9975 Package is absent in the Model 9977 Package; (2) The Model 9975 Package has eight allowable contents, while the Model 9977 Package has a single allowable content. (3) The 6CV of the Model 9977 Package is similar in design to the outer Containment Vessel of the Model 9975 Package that also incorporates a 5-inch Containment Vessel as the inner Containment Vessel. (4) The Model 9975 Package uses a Celotex{reg_sign}-based impact limiter while the Model 9977 Package uses Last-A-Foam{reg_sign}, a polyurethane foam, for the impact limiter. (5) The Model 9975 Package has two Containment Vessels, while the Model 9977 Package has a single Containment Vessel.

DiSabatino, A; Hafner, R; West, M

2007-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

50

Technical specification: Mixed-oxide pellets for the light-water reactor irradiation demonstration test  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This technical specification is a Level 2 Document as defined in the Fissile Materials Disposition Program Light-Water Reactor Mixed-oxide Fuel Irradiation Test Project Plan. It is patterned after the pellet specification that was prepared by Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited, for use by Los Alamos National Laboratory in fabrication of the test fuel for the Parallex Project, adjusted as necessary to reflect the differences between the Canadian uranium-deuterium reactor and light-water reactor fuels. This specification and the associated engineering drawing are to be utilized only for preparation of test fuel as outlined in the accompanying Request for Quotation and for additional testing as directed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory or the Department of Energy.

Cowell, B.S.

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Technical evaluation of the proposed design modifications and technical specification changes on grid voltage degradation (Part A) for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the technical evaluation of the proposed design modifications and Technical Specification changes for protection of Class 1E equipment from grid voltage degradation for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. The review criteria are based on several IEEE standards and the Code of Federal Regulations. The evaluation compares the submittals made by the licensee with the NRC staff positions and the review criteria and presents the reviewer's conclusion on the acceptability of the proposed system.

White, R.L.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

Technical specifications manual for the MARK-1 pulsed ionizing radiation detection system. Volume 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The MARK-1 detection system was developed by the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory for the US Department of Energy Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation. The completely portable system was designed for the detection and analysis of intense photon emissions from pulsed ionizing radiation sources. This manual presents the technical design specifications for the MARK-1 detection system and was written primarily to assist the support or service technician in the service, calibration, and repair of the system. The manual presents the general detection system theory, the MARK-1 component design specifications, the acquisition and control software, the data processing sequence, and the system calibration procedure. A second manual entitled: Volume 2: Operations Manual for the MARK-1 Pulsed Ionizing Radiation Detection System (USDOE Report WINCO-1108, September 1992) provides a general operational description of the MARK-1 detection system. The Operations Manual was written primarily to assist the field operator in system operations and analysis of the data.

Lawrence, R.S.; Harker, Y.D.; Jones, J.L.; Hoggan, J.M.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Test and evaluation document for DOT Specification 7A Type A Packaging. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has been conducting, through several of its operating contractors, an evaluation and testing program to qualify Type A radioactive material packagings per US Department of Transportation (DOT) Specification 7A (DOT-7A) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49, Part 178 (49 CFR 178). The program is currently administered by the DOE, Office of Facility Safety Analysis, DOE/EH-32, at DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) in Germantown, Maryland. This document summarizes the evaluation and testing performed for all of the packagings successfully qualified in this program.

NONE

1996-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

54

Handbook of methods for risk-based analysis of Technical Specification requirements  

SciTech Connect

Technical Specifications (TS) requirements for nuclear power plants define the Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) and Surveillance Requirements (SRs) to assure safety during operation. In general, these requirements were based on deterministic analysis and engineering judgments. Experiences with plant operation indicate that some elements of the requirements are unnecessarily restrictive, while others may not be conducive to safety. Improvements in these requirements are facilitated by the availability of plant specific Probabilistic Safety Assessments (PSAs). The use of risk and reliability-based methods to improve TS requirements has gained wide interest because these methods can: quantitatively evaluate the risk impact and justify changes based on objective risk arguments. Provide a defensible basis for these requirements for regulatory applications. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) Office of Research is sponsoring research to develop systematic risk-based methods to improve various aspects of TS requirements. The handbook of methods, which is being prepared, summarizes such risk-based methods. The scope of the handbook includes reliability and risk-based methods for evaluating allowed outage times (AOTs), action statements requiring shutdown where shutdown risk may be substantial, surveillance test intervals (STIs), defenses against common-cause failures, managing plant configurations, and scheduling maintenances. For each topic, the handbook summarizes methods of analysis and data needs, outlines the insights to be gained, lists additional references, and presents examples of evaluations.

Samanta, P.K.; Vesely, W.E.

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

55

BWRVIP-266: BWR Vessel and Internals Project, Technical Bases for Revision of the BWRVIP-41 Jet Pump Inspection Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revision to reinspection requirements based on the collection and analysis of inspection data is a valid and valuable approach for optimizing inspection programs. The results of this work provide an optimized program that decreases inspection burden while ensuring 1) that locations found to have higher susceptibility to degradation and/or higher safety significance continue to receive appropriate inspection focus and 2) that the level of safety provided by the existing inspection program recommended ...

2012-10-18T23:59:59.000Z

56

Fuel Reliability Guidelines: Fuel Surveillance and Inspection, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) report presents revised guidance for performing nuclear fuel assessments and inspections. The revision provides technical guidance on the scope and frequency of fuel performance assessments and inspections to support the industry goal of zero fuel failures and performance issues. To help achieve this goal, both failed and healthy fuel must be inspected. Such inspections advance the understanding of fuel failure mechanisms and unit-specific fuel margins, leadi...

2012-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

57

Handbook of methods for risk-based analyses of technical specifications  

SciTech Connect

Technical Specifications (TS) requirements for nuclear power plants define the Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) and Surveillance Requirements (SRs) to assure safety during operation. In general, these requirements are based on deterministic analysis and engineering judgments. Experiences with plant operation indicate that some elements of the requirements are unnecessarily restrictive, while a few may not be conducive to safety. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) Office of Research has sponsored research to develop systematic risk-based methods to improve various aspects of TS requirements. This handbook summarizes these risk-based methods. The scope of the handbook includes reliability and risk-based methods for evaluating allowed outage times (AOTs), scheduled or preventive maintenance, action statements requiring shutdown where shutdown risk may be substantial, surveillance test intervals (STIs), and management of plant configurations resulting from outages of systems, or components. For each topic, the handbook summarizes analytic methods with data needs, outlines the insights to be gained, lists additional references, and gives examples of evaluations.

Samanta, P.K.; Kim, I.S. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Mankamo, T. [Avaplan Oy, Espoo (Finland); Vesely, W.E. [Science Applications International Corp., Dublin, OH (United States)

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

Technical support for the Ukrainian State Committee for Nuclear Radiation Safety on specific waste issues  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The government of Ukraine, a now-independent former member of the Soviet Union, has asked the United States to assist its State Committee for Nuclear and Radiation Safety (SCNRS) in improving its regulatory control in technical fields for which it has responsibility. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is providing this assistance in several areas, including management of radioactive waste and spent fuel. Radioactive wastes resulting from nuclear power plant operation, maintenance, and decommissioning must be stored and ultimately disposed of appropriately. In addition, radioactive residue from radioisotopes used in various industrial and medical applications must be managed. The objective of this program is to provide the Ukrainian SCNRS with the information it needs to establish regulatory control over uranium mining and milling activities in the Zheltye Vody (Yellow Waters) area and radioactive waste disposal in the Pripyat (Chernobyl) area among others. The author of this report, head of the Environmental Technology Section, Health Sciences Research Division of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, accompanied NRC staff to Ukraine to meet with SCNRS staff and visit sites in question. The report highlights problems at the sites visited and recommends license conditions that SCNRS can require to enhance safety of handling mining and milling wastes. The author`s responsibility was specifically for the visit to Zheltye Vody and the mining and milling waste sites associated with that facility. An itinerary for the Zheltye Vody portion of the trip is included as Appendix A.

Little, C.A.

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

59

Technical Specifications of Micro-Hydropower System Design and Implementation : Feasibility Analysis and Design of Lamaya Khola Micro-Hydro Power Plant.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??The purpose of this thesis is to first conduct a literature review regarding the technical specifications and design parametres required to design a working Micro… (more)

Kunwor, Anil

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Technical Review Report for the Model 9975-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00003, Revision 0, January 2008)  

SciTech Connect

This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), on the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging, Model 9975, Revision 0, dated January 2008 (S-SARP-G-00003, the SARP). The review includes an evaluation of the SARP, with respect to the requirements specified in 10 CFR 71, and in International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9975-96 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The safety analysis of the Model 9975-85 Packaging is documented in the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging, Model 9975, B(M)F-85, Revision 0, dated December 2003. The Model 9975-85 Package is certified by DOE Certificate of Compliance (CoC) package identification number, USA/9975/B(M)F-85, for the transportation of Type B quantities of uranium metal/oxide, {sup 238}Pu heat sources, plutonium/uranium metals, plutonium/uranium oxides, plutonium composites, plutonium/tantalum composites, {sup 238}Pu oxide/beryllium metal.

West, M

2009-05-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

TECHNICAL NOTE A  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TECHNICAL NOTE A novel FRET approach for in situ investigation of cellulase-cellulose interaction Liqun Wang & Yiqing Wang & Arthur J. Ragauskas Received: 15 May 2010 Revised: 9...

62

Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project (UMTRAP), Slick Rock, Colorado, Revision 1. Bid schedule, special conditions, specifications, and subcontract drawings  

SciTech Connect

This volume contains: bidding requirements; terms and conditions; specifications for Division 1 -- general requirements; specifications for Division 2 -- sitework; specifications for Divisions 5 -- metals; subcontract drawings, (general, Union Carbide processing site, North Continent processing site, and Burro Canyon disposal site).

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

Guidelines for PWR Steam Generator Tubing Specifications and Repair: Volume 2, Revision 1: Guidelines for Procurement of Alloy 690 S team Generator Tubing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revised document provides guidelines for procuring Alloy 690 steam generator tubing and sleeve material.

1999-04-14T23:59:59.000Z

64

Technical Review Report for the Model 9978-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00002, Revision 1, March 2009)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE), on the 'Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), Model 9978 B(M)F-96', Revision 1, March 2009 (S-SARP-G-00002). The Model 9978 Package complies with 10 CFR 71, and with 'Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material-1996 Edition (As Amended, 2000)-Safety Requirements', International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9978 Packaging is designed, analyzed, fabricated, and tested in accordance with Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&PVC). The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the DOE's 'Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages'. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., 'Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material'. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9978 Packaging is a single containment package, using a 5-inch containment vessel (5CV). It uses a nominal 35-gallon drum package design. In comparison, the Model 9977 Packaging uses a 6-inch containment vessel (6CV). The Model 9977 and Model 9978 Packagings were developed concurrently, and they were referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package, Version 1 (GPFP). Both packagings use General Plastics FR-3716 polyurethane foam as insulation and as impact limiters. The 5CV is used as the Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) in the Model 9975-96 Packaging. The Model 9975-96 Packaging also has the 6CV as its Secondary Containment Vessel (SCV). In comparison, the Model 9975 Packagings use Celotex{trademark} for insulation and as impact limiters. To provide a historical perspective, it is noted that the Model 9975-96 Packaging is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then-newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The Model 9978 Package has six Content Envelopes: C.1 ({sup 238}Pu Heat Sources), C.2 ( Pu/U Metals), C.3 (Pu/U Oxides, Reserved), C.4 (U Metal or Alloy), C.5 (U Compounds), and C.6 (Samples and Sources). Per 10 CFR 71.59 (Code of Federal Regulations), the value of N is 50 for the Model 9978 Package leading to a Criticality Safety Index (CSI) of 1.0. The Transport Index (TI), based on dose rate, is calculated to be a maximum of 4.1.

West, M

2009-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

65

Technical Specification action statements requiring shutdown. A risk perspective with application to the RHR/SSW systems of a BWR  

SciTech Connect

When safety systems fail during power operation, the limiting conditions for operation (LCOs) and associated action statements of technical specifications typically require that the plant be shut down within the limits of allowed outage time (AOT). However, when a system needed to remove decay heat, such as the residual heat removal (RHR) system, is inoperable or degraded, shutting down the plant may not necessarily be preferable, from a risk perspective, to continuing power operation over a usual repair time, giving priority to the repairs. The risk impact of the basic operational alternatives, i.e., continued operation or shutdown, was evaluated for failures in the RHR and standby service water (SSW) systems of a boiling-water reactor (BWR) nuclear power plant. A complete or partial failure of the SSW system fails or degrades not only the RHR system but other front-line safety systems supported by the SSW system. This report presents the methodology to evaluate the risk impact of LCOs and associated AOT; the results of risk evaluation from its application to the RHR and SSW systems of a BWR; the findings from the risk-sensitivity analyses to identify alternative operational policies; and the major insights and recommendations to improve the technical specifications action statements.

Mankamo, T. [Avaplan Oy, Espoo (Finland); Kim, I.S.; Samanta, P.K. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Radiological control manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Radiological Control Manual (LBNL RCM) has been prepared to provide guidance for site-specific additions, supplements and interpretation of the DOE Radiological Control Manual. The guidance provided in this manual is one methodology to implement the requirements given in Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835 (10 CFR 835) and the DOE Radiological Control Manual. Information given in this manual is also intended to provide demonstration of compliance to specific requirements in 10 CFR 835. The LBNL RCM (Publication 3113) and LBNL Health and Safety Manual Publication-3000 form the technical basis for the LBNL RPP and will be revised as necessary to ensure that current requirements from Rules and Orders are represented. The LBNL RCM will form the standard for excellence in the implementation of the LBNL RPP.

Kloepping, R.

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Record of Technical Change {number_sign}1 for ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 and Building 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 and Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada'' Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Record of Technical Change provides updates to the technical information included in ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 and Building 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 and Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada'' Revision 0

US DOE Nevada Operations Office

1999-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

68

Pressure vessel and piping codes. Technical basis for revised reference crack growth rate curves for pressure boundary steels in LWR environment  

SciTech Connect

Since the inception of the pressure vessel and piping codes the reference fatigue crack growth rate curves have been contained in Appendix A of Sect. XI. The curves have been designed to be applicable to carbon and low alloy pressure vessel steels exposed to either air or light water reactor coolant environments. Data obtained over the past several years have shown a different behavior of these steels in the light water reactor environment than that predicted by the present reference curve. A revised set of reference curves has been formulated, incorporating a new curve shape as well as a dependency of growth rate on R ratio (minimum load/maximum load). This work provides the background and justification for such a revision, details the methodology used to develop the revised curves, and includes an evalution of the adequacy and impact of the revised curves as compared with the single curve which they replace. 24 references.

Bamford, W.H.

1980-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

69

A technical basis to relax the dew point specification for the environment in the vapor space in DWPF canisters  

SciTech Connect

This memorandum establishes the technical basis to conclude that relaxing, from 0 C to 20 C, the dew point specification for the atmosphere in the vapor space (free volume) of a DWPF canister will not provide an environment that will cause significant amounts of corrosion induced degradation of the canister wall. The conclusion is based on engineering analysis, experience and review of the corrosion literature. The basic assumptions underlying the conclusion are: (1) the canister was fabricated from Type 304L stainless steel; (2) the corrosion behavior of the canister material, including base metal, fusion zones and heat effected zones, is typified by literature data for, and industrial experience with, 300 series austenitic stainless steels; and (3) the glass-metal crevices created during the pouring operation will not alter the basic corrosion resistance of the steel although such crevices might serve as sites for the initiation of minor amounts of corrosion on the canister wall.

Louthan, M.R. Jr.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Feasibility study for fuel-grade-ethanol complex, Kennewick, Washington. Volume III of V. Technical report. Appendix A, Book 1. Equipment and material specifications  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Books 1 and 2 of Appendix A to Volume III, Technical Report, contain copies of major equipment and material specifications used in the preliminary design and engineering of the Ethanol Complex. These specifications are used in securing vendor quotations which are the basis of the plant definitive cost estimate. Section 3 contains copies of all equipment and material, process, and mechanical outline specifications. Included in this part are: cooling towers and mechanical equipment.

Not Available

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TECHNICAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES DOE-TSPP-9 Revision: 5 Date: August 1, 2000 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-9 Maintenance Revision: 5 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1

72

Space Conditioning Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Space Conditioning Standing Technical Space Conditioning Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan, v2011a Revised: January 2012 Committee Chair: 2011 Eric Martin Janet McIlvaine BA-PIRC Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan Overview Standing Technical Committees (STCs) focus on resolving key technical action items required to meet Building America performance goals. STC chairs lead each committees' activities in addressing specific research challenges, gaps in understanding, and new research opportunities. Committees include experts from the Building America research teams, DOE, national laboratories, and outside organizations that possess specialized knowledge or heightened interest in the topics being addressed. Committee chairs can create sub-committees on an as-needed basis to address targeted research needs.

73

Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Specifications Grid connection Hardwired Connector type CHAdeMo Approximate size (H x W x D inches) 38 x 69 x 21 Charge level DC Fast Charge Input voltage 480 VAC - 3 Phase...

74

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-1 Responsibilities Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................... 1

75

Specific  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Specific Specific energy for pulsed laser rock drilling Z. Xu, a) C. B. Reed, and G. Konercki Technology Development Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60540 R. A. Parker b) Parker Geoscience Consulting, LLC, Arvada, Colorado 80403 B. C. Gahan Gas Technology Institute, Des Plains, Illinois 60018 S. Batarseh c) and R. M. Graves Department of Petroleum Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401 H. Figueroa Petroleos de Venezuela INTEVEP, S.A., Caracas 1070A, Venezuela N. Skinner Halliburton Energy Service, Carrollton, Texas 75006 Í‘Received 20 December 2001; accepted for publication 19 August 2002Í’ Application of advanced high power laser technology to oil and gas well drilling has been attracting significant research interests recently among research institutes, petroleum industries, and universities. Potential laser or laser-aided

76

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-10 Conversion Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS.................................................................... 1

77

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 APPROVING AND ISSUING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-8 Approval Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. APPROVING AND ISSUING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS .................................................... 1

78

Lighting technology specifications for relighting federal buildings  

SciTech Connect

Under a Federal Relighting Initiative (FRI) project, a set of Master Lighting Technology Specifications was developed for use by the Federal sector in relighting buildings. The specifications were to cover all major lighting technologies. The initial set was developed and issued for extensive peer review in December 1991. Extensive comments were received from industry, Federal sector participants (DOD, GSA, NASA, DOE, etc.), national laboratories, professional lighting organizations, private lighting professionals, and recognized experts in the lighting community. The document underwent extensive revision and was reissued in June 1992 for a second round of peer review. The current FRI Lighting Technology Specifications are organized into two sections: (1) Technical Notes and (2) Master Specifications. The Technical Notes contain explanations that enable the users to understand the background and reasons for specification requirements. The Master Specifications are organized in the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) format and are intended to form the basis for competitive bidding and contracting to undertake relighting initiatives.

Harris, L. [USDOE, Washington, DC (United States); Purcell, C. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Gordon, H. [Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann Associates (United States); McKay, H. [McKay (Hayden) Lighting Design (United States)

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

REVISION POLICY  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

REVISION POLICY REVISION POLICY March 2007 Data are collected at the million cubic feet per month level and all calculations mentioned below are carried out at that precision. However, the data published in the Form EIA-914 Monthly Gas Production Report are rounded to the nearest 0.01 billion cubic feet per day (roughly 300 million cubic feet per month). Monthly estimates of gross production published in the Natural Gas Monthly at the national level are rounded to billion cubic feet and those for marketed production at the State level are rounded to million cubic feet. The prior month's production estimate will always be revised each month, when the production estimate for the latest data month is released. For example, a June estimate would be revised when a July estimate is released.

80

BWRVIP-201: BWR Vessel and Internals Project, Technical Basis For Plant Specific Safety Evaluation for Hydrazine Injection for Start up ECP Reduction in BWRs  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the technical basis for a plant-specific safety evaluation of hydrazine injection into the primary system of a BWR during startup, with the objective of minimizing the electrochemical corrosion potential (ECP), and thereby reducing intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC). PWR operators have been injecting hydrazine into primary systems at startup for many years with no observed adverse impact on fuel or materials. The report concludes that BWR hydrazine injection is feasible...

2008-11-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Nuclear Safety Technical Positions/Interpretations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(OPI) responsible for the development, interpretation, and revision of a number of DOE directives. Technical Positions to directives issued by Nuclear and Facility Safety...

82

CRADA Order Revision  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CRADA Order Revision CRADA Order Revision Linda Field Patent Counsel Department of Energy Goal CRADA Order DOE O 483.1 CRADA Manual DOE M 483.1-1 CRADA Order DOE O XXXX.X Departmental Directive Program Types of Directives Policies Regulations Orders Notices Manuals Guides Technical Standards Departmental Directive Program Directives Life Cycle Development Coordination Implementation Review (Certification) Development Phase *Orders are uploaded to RevCom for review and comment by all affected parties *60 days to develop draft & submit to MA-90 *Solicits input from stakeholders ( incl. field, contractors, and/or program counsel) Coordination Phase *MA-90 parses directive & sets due dates for review & comment *HQ Directives Points of Contact (DPCs) *Have 45 days to submit official comments on behalf of their

83

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

-2 -2 Processing Inactive Records Revised Version Issued as P 200.2-2B LM Procedure 200.2-2A, Processing Internal Inactive Records for Storage of 7/18/07, has undergone revision. The revised procedure includes updated references, definitions, and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.2-2A with LM Procedure 200.2-2B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. Procedure 200.2-2B INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

84

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4-1 4-1 Records Management Self-Assessment Revised Version Issued as P200.4-1B LM Procedure 200.4-1, Records Management Self-Assessment of 4/17/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.4-1A with LM Procedure 200.4-1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 8 pages, 2 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

85

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes Summary of Changes to Procedure 243.1 Records Inventory Revised Version Issued as P 243.1B LM Procedure 243.1A, Records Inventory of 7/18/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and to ensure the references cited and associated forms remain current. Please replace LM Procedure 243.1A with LM Procedure 243.1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 9 pages, 3 attachments

86

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes To Procedure 200.1-5 Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure Revised Version Issued as P 200.1-5B LM Procedure 200.1-5, Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure of 1/19/07, has undergone revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and updates to the attached Plan. Please replace LM Procedure 200.1-5A with LM Procedure 200.1-5B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents.

87

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision No. 0 (with Record of Technical Change No. 1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of a recommended corrective action alternative (CAA) appropriate to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action (CAU) 5: Landfills, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the NTS, CAU 5 is comprised of eight corrective action sites (CASs). The corrective action investigation (CAI) of CAU 5 was conducted from October 7, 2002 through January 30, 2003, with geophysical surveys completed from March 6 through May 8, 2002, and topographic surveys conducted from March 11 through April 29, 2003. Contaminants of concern (COCs) were identified only at CAS 12-15-01. Those COCs included total petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations in Areas 5, 6, 12, 20, and 23 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following single alternative was developed for consideration. Close in Place with Administrative Controls is the recommended alternative for all of the CASs in CAU 5. This alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. Additionally, the alternative meets all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and will eliminate inadvertent intrusion into landfills at CAU 5.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

88

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-2 Need Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE...

89

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION ............................................................................................................ 1

90

Revision History  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision History Revision History Rev. 0, August 2012 Original submittal for milestone M3FT-12SN0804032 (Sandia programmatic and classification review) Rev. 1, September 2012 Corrected transposition errors in costing tables; recalculated stainless steel overpacks to be carbon steel; corrected various editorial problems. (SAND2012-7979P) Rev. 2, November 2012 Performed peer review and retitled. Submittal for milestone M2FT-13SN0804031 (formerly milestone M2FT- 12SN0804031) (SAND2012-9737P) Unclassified Unlimited Release Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

91

Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, April 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions .......................................... 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision .......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices..........................................1 *DOE Technical Standards Published.......................................... 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions.......................................... 2 *American National Standards Institute

92

Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project: Technical Data Catalog quarterly supplement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The March 21, 1993, Department of Energy (DOE)/Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Site-Specific Procedural Agreement for Geologic Repository Site Investigation and Characterization Program requires the DOE to develop and maintain a catalog of data which will be updated and provided to the NRC at least quarterly. This catalog is to include a description of the data; the time (date), place, and method of acquisition; and where it may be examined. The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP) Technical Data Catalog is published and distributed in accordance with the requirements of the Site-Specific Agreement. The YMP Technical Data Catalog is a report based on reference information contained in the YMP Automated Technical Data Tracking System (ATDT). The reference information is provided by Participants for data acquired or developed in support of the YMP. The Technical Data Catalog is updated quarterly and published in the month following the end of each quarter. A complete revision to the Catalog is published at the end of each fiscal year. Supplements to the end-of-year edition are published each quarter. These supplements provide information related to new data items not included in previous quarterly updates and data items affected by changes to previously published reference information. The Technical Data Catalog, dated September 30, 1993, should be retained as the baseline document for the supplements until the end-of-year revision is published and distributed in October 1994.

NONE

1994-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

93

Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project technical data catalog: Quarterly supplement  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE)/Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Site-Specific Procedural Agreement for Geologic Repository Site Investigation and Characterization Program requires the DOE to develop and maintain a catalog of data which will be updated and provided to the NRC at least quarterly. This catalog is to include a description of the data; the time (date), place, and method of acquisition; and where the data may be examined. The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP) Technical Data Catalog is published and distributed-in accordance with the requirements of the Site-Specific Agreement. The YMP Technical Data Catalog is a report based on reference information contained in the YMP Automated Technical Data Tracking System (ATDT). The reference information is provided by Participants for data acquired or developed in support of the YMP. The Technical Data Catalog is updated quarterly and distributed in the month following the end of each quarter. A complete revision to the catalog is published at the end of each fiscal year. Supplements to the end-of-year edition are published each quarter. These supplements provide information related to new data items not included in previous quarterly updates and data items affected by changes to previously published reference information. The Technical Data Catalog, dated September 30, 1994, should be retained as the baseline document for the supplements until the end-of-year revision is published and distributed in October 1995.

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

94

OA-50 Technical Qualification Program Standard Procedure, October 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SP-OA-50-TQP-1 SP-OA-50-TQP-1 Office of Oversight Revision 0 Standard Procedure Page 2 of 19 Office/Facility Specific Qualification Standards build upon the Functional Area Qualification Standards and a functional analysis of the participant's specific office mission requirements and activities. Successful completion of the TQP entails satisfying all competencies contained in the General Technical Base, assigned primary Functional Area and Office/Facility Specific Qualification Standards applicable to the participant's position. Participants should normally successfully complete all TQP requirements within 18 months from the date they entered the program. Upon successful completion of the TQP, Oversight members will start the requalification

95

Technical Papers  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... TECHNICAL INFORMATION. ... Technical comments: nsrl@nist.gov. Website comments: web897@nist.gov. Technical Papers. ...

2013-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

96

DOE Technical Standards Program: Procedures  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Office of Nuclear Safety The following procedures should be used to write, revise, or maintain a DOE technical standard. They are also used to convert a DOE technical standard to a non-government standard or to form a topical committee. Table of Contents (TSPP-00) Program Overview and Responsibilities (TSPP-01) Initiating DOE Technical Standards (TSPP-02) Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and Interaction with Standards Development Organizations (TSPP-03) Developing DOE Technical Standard (TSPP-04) Coordination of Technical Standards (TSPP-05) - Draft In Concurrence Resolution - TSPP-06-2009 is the currently approved TSPP that addresses coordination of DOE Technical Standards. Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards (TSPP-06)

97

Integrated test vehicle program plan: revision C  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This edition dated August 26, 1977, is Revision C of the Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, Phase II - Deliverable Item 2-7-1. The original edition was issued on May 27, 1977. Corrections were made and issued as Proposed Modifications for Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, dated July 8, 1977. For the purpose of documenting changes, the July 8, 1977, version is caled Revision A. The edition dated August 5, 1977, is called Revision B. Each paragraph in this edition is marked to indicate technical changes from previous editions.

Not Available

1977-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

98

Technical Foundation of Reactor Safety, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Following the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island Unit 2involving damaged fuel and fission product releaseEPRI undertook an intensive research program to investigate fission product behavior during light water reactor (LWR) severe accident scenarios. The EPRI program included experiments to obtain fundamental data and the development of computer-based models of the phenomena involved. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and various international organizations also initiated similar research p...

2010-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

99

DOE G 435.1-1 Appendix A, Technical Basis and Considerations for DOE M 435.1-1 (Appendix A)  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This appendix establishes the technical basis of the order revision process and of each of the requirements included in the revised radioactive waste ...

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

100

Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2007 November 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 10-29-2007 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 09-27-2007 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

102

Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-27-2007 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

103

Technical Standards Newsletter - January 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2008 January 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter - January 2008 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 12-27-2007 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

104

Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2008 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 01-28-2008 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

105

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TECHNICAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM PROCEDURES DOE-TSPP-10 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-10 Conversion Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1

106

1999 EV America Technical Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

braking and anti-lock brake systems. 4.3 OVERHEATING The vehicle motor and controllerinverter should be capable of continuous operation at maximum vehicle speed andor sustained...

107

JOB ORDER CONTRACT Technical Specifications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

or SABS 135. Shear plates, tooth connectors and split rings These shall be as specified in BBS 1759 : 1960 Trusses'. Nails These shall be in accordance with SABS 820 : 1974. Metal connector plates Metal truss connector plates shall be fabricated out of galvanised steel of at least 1mm nominal thickness. The steel

Gelfond, Michael

108

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular Applications October 30, 2006* U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program *Revised June, 2008 #12;Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................8 APPENDIX A: Review of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Systems

109

2009 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is the Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable...

110

Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2007 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, April 2007 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

111

Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Newsletter- April 2008 Newsletter- April 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008 Document Status on 03-27-2008 Inside this issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

112

Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2007 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, February 2007 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

113

Technical Standards Newsletter- July 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Newsletter- July 2006 Newsletter- July 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter- July 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, July 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

114

Technical Standards Newsletter- May 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Newsletter- May 2006 Newsletter- May 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter- May 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, May 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions.......................................... 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP.......................................... 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation..........................................1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices..........................................1 *DOE Technical Standards Published..........................................1 *Non-Government Standards Actions..........................................2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI)..........................................2

115

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 2005 August 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, August 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

116

Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2006 November 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, November 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

117

Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2006 October 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, Ocrober 2006 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

118

Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2005 July 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, July 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ............................ 2

119

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 USE OF VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARDS AND INTERACTION WITH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 Standards Use / Participation DOE-TSPP-3 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 i PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-TSPP-3 Standards Use / Participation Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program ii CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1

120

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-1 Responsibilities Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Development of New DOE Technical Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-5 Development Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................. 1 2. DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................... 1

122

Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2005 November 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, November 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 *ASTM International 2 *American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 *National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2005

123

Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2005 October 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, October 2005 Inside This Issue: *DOE Standards Actions 1 *New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 *DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 *DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 *DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 *DOE Technical Standards Published 1 *Non-Government Standards Actions 2 *American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 *American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 *ASTM International 2 *American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 *National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2005 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - November 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - July 2005

124

Recent Revisions to PVWATTS  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

PVWATTS is an Internet-accessible software program that allows the user to easily calculate the energy production and cost savings for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems located throughout the United States. To ensure that PVWATTS continues to meet its users' needs, an online survey form was provided to users to identify areas for improvement. The results of the survey were used to prioritize improvements to PVWATTS in FY2005. PVWATTS was revised by changing the PV system specification input for system size from an AC power rating to a nameplate DC power rating; adding an input for an overall DC to AC derate factor; updating the residential electric rates; adding monthly and yearly solar radiation values for the PV array; and simplifying the user interface for Version 2.

Marion, B.; Anderberg, M.; Gray-Hann, P.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Enclosures Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enclosures Standing Technical Committee Enclosures Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan, v2011a Revised: December 2011 Committee Chair: 2011 Joseph Lstiburek Kohta Ueno Katie Boucher Building Science Corporation i Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. iii Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Enclosures STC Strategic Plan Overview ............................................................................................ 1

126

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2005 May 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - May 2005 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions........................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP..................................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices.................................................... 1 DOE Technical Standards Revisions................................................. 1 DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated.................................................... 1 Non-Government Standards Actions..................................................... 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI)........................................ 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)................................... 2

127

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, August 2006 Inside This Isssue: DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

128

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2007 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, May 2007 Inside This Issue: DOE Standards Actions ............................ 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices ............................ 1 DOE Technical Standards Published ............................ 1 Non-Government Standards Actions ............................ 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ............................ 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

129

Department of Energy Technical Standards Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Technical Standards Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Department of Energy Technical Standards Program The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE. Online Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Archive Monthly Status Reports Subscribe RSS logo Subscribe to receive the latest DOE Approved Technical Standards via an RSS feed. Take Action Write, revise, or maintain a DOE Technical Standard Review a DOE Technical Standard at RevCom for TSP Additional Information Technical Standards Program Information

130

Advanced Lighting Guidelines: 1993 (Revision 1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This series of guidelines, originally published in 1990 by the California Energy Commission, provides both technical and practical information about energy-efficient lighting equipment and design techniques. This revised version updates the 1990 information and adds four new sections on lighting controls and daylighting. EPRI's cofunding and publication of these guidelines will facilitate utility access to this information, resulting in increased lighting quality and energy efficiency.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Technical Standards Newsletter - March 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2006 March 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter - March 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - March 2006 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Attention Technical Standards Managers ........................................................................ 1 Technical Standards Program Topical Committee Developments ..................................... 1 A Note from the Manager .............................................................................................. 2 Welcome Aboard .......................................................................................................... 3 Standards Development to be Pursued by New Center for Distributed Power ................. 4 Year 2000 Revisions of ISO 9000 Standards Released ................................................... 4

132

SG Network System Requirements Specification  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SG Network System Requirements Specification SG Network System Requirements Specification Interim Release 3 5/17/2010 - 2 - Table of Contents Document History ....................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Revision History .......................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Preface........................................................................................................................................................ - 4 - Authors........................................................................................................................................................ - 6 -

133

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

134

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

135

Functional Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Functional Specifications Functional Specifications Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) OSCARS Case Study Documentation User Manual FAQ Design Specifications Functional Specifications Notifications Publications Authorization Policy Default Attributes Message Security Clients For Developers Interfaces Links Hardware Requirements DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Functional Specifications OSCARS Reservation Manager - Functional Specifications Year 3 Update (DRAFT)

136

Protocol, Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 Protocol, Technical Qualification Program - October 22, 2003 October 22, 2003 Technical Qualification Program Procedure (OA-50-TQP-1) This procedure implements the Office of ES&H Evaluations Technical Qualification Program (TQP) per the criteria contained in DOE Manual 426.1-1 "Federal Technical Capability Manual". Key elements of the program include: identifying personnel required to participate in the TQP, identifying, developing, approving, revising and updating individual qualification requirements, evaluating staff members against the assigned Technical Qualification Standards and documenting the approval of equivalencies, establishing and updating individual development plans, training

137

NEHRP - Technical Briefs  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Library. Design & Construction Technical Briefs. Technical Briefs. Also ... Clearinghouse. NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. ...

138

REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT Purpose This procedure outlines the process for registering a project to develop a DOE Technical Standard, to perform certain periodic updates (revisions, reaffirmations, inactivations for new design, and reinstatements) to DOE Technical Standards, or to register a person's or organization's intent to work with a non-Government standards body to prepare or revise a non-Government standard. The procedure also describes the approval process required before a project can be registered. Registering a Technical Standard Project (TSPP-04) More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000

139

Technical Resources  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

AOCS Resource Directory helps members maintain technical excellence in their professions. Technical Resources Analytical Chemistry acid analysis Analytical Chemistry aocs applicants april articles atomic)FluorometryDifferential scanning calorimetry chemi

140

Technical Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Technical Guidance, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security develops and issues Government-wide and Department-wide technical guidance to ensure that classified nuclear...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Depleted Uranium Technical Brief  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. This Technical Brief specifically addresses DU in an environmental contamination setting and specifically does.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and other govern ment sources. DU occurs in a number of different compounds airborne releases of uranium at one DOE facility amounted to 310,000 kg between 1951 and 1988, which

142

Design Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Design Design Specifications Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) OSCARS Case Study Documentation User Manual FAQ Design Specifications Functional Specifications Notifications Publications Authorization Policy Default Attributes Message Security Clients For Developers Interfaces Links Hardware Requirements DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net Design Specifications OSCARS Reservation Manager - Design Specifications Year 3 Update (DRAFT) David Robertson, Chin Guok

143

Revisiting the Past and Settling the Score: Index Revision for House Price Derivatives  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Method for Real Estate Price Index Construction. Journal ofRevision Bias in Repeat Sale Home Price Indices. UnpublishedCalhoun, C.A. 1996. OFHEO House Price Indexes: HPI Technical

Clapham, Eric; Englund, Peter; Quigley, John M.; Redfearn, Christian L.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-8  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 APPROVING AND ISSUING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585...

145

2009 Revisions EIA-914  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

for Texas, which was partially the cause for the review of the EIA-914, which, in turn, led to the development and implementation of this new methodology. Downward revisions in...

146

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION........................................................................................................... 1

147

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 ESTABLISHING THE NEED FOR A TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-2 Need Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1

148

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-9  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-9 Maintenance Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE...................................................................................................... 1

149

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 REGISTERING A TECHNICAL STANDARD PROJECT U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-4 Registration Revision: 6 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. REGISTERING THE PROJECT................................................................................................... 1

150

Forecast Technical Document Technical Glossary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Forecast Technical Document Technical Glossary A document defining some of the terms used in the 2011 Production Forecast technical documentation. Tom Jenkins Robert Matthews Ewan Mackie Lesley in the Forecast documentation. In some cases, the terms and the descriptions are "industry standard", in others

151

Technical Standards, Newsletter-August 1997 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

at OSTI to place all DOE technical standards (i.e., DOE Standards, Specifications, Handbooks, and Technical Standards Lists) on the Internet. The Standards Forum and Standards...

152

Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Southeast Regional Clean Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis Revised Joyce McLaren Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-49192 Revised April 2011 ERRATA SHEET NREL REPORT/PROJECT NUMBER: TP-6A20-49192 TITLE: Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis AUTHOR(S): Joyce McLaren ORIGINAL PUBLICATION DATE: January 2011 DATE OF CORRECTIONS (MM/YYYY): 04/2011 The following figures and tables were replaced: Page vii, Figure ES-2 Page ix, Table ES-1 Page 12, Table 1 Page 20, Figure 10 Page 51, Table 11 Page 52, Figure 18 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401

153

Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement - August 29,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Project Justification Statement - Program Project Justification Statement - August 29, 2012 Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement - August 29, 2012 August 29, 2012 DOE Technical Standards Program Project Justification Statement As part of the new justification process for developing or revising DOE Technical Standards, organizations, people are asked to provide the listed information (in numeric format) in a Project Justification Statement (PJS) prior to submitting the requisite Project Registration and Approval Request form (F 1300.5). Technical Standards, Program Project Justification Statement More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-2-2013, Initiating DOE Technical Standards Active Project Justification Statement DOE-TSPP-7-2013, Maintaining DOE Technical Standards

154

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 168: Areas 25 and 26 Contaminated Materials and Waste Dumps, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Record of Technical Change No. 1  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document identifies and rationalizes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's selection of recommended corrective action alternatives (CAAs) to facilitate the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU)168: Areas 25 and 26 Contaminated Materials and Waste Dumps, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Located in Areas 25 and 26 at the NTS in Nevada, CAU 168 is comprised of twelve Corrective Action Sites (CASs). Review of data collected during the corrective action investigation, as well as consideration of current and future operations in Areas 25 and 26 of the NTS, led the way to the development of three CAAs for consideration: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Clean Closure; and Alternative 3 - Close in Place with Administrative Controls. As a result of this evaluation, a combination of all three CAAs is recommended for this CAU. Alternative 1 was the preferred CAA for three CASs, Alternative 2 was the preferred CAA for six CASs (and nearly all of one other CAS), and Alternative 3 was the preferred CAA for two CASs (and a portion of one other CAS) to complete the closure at the CAU 168 sites. These alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated as well as all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the sites and elimination of potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated soils at CAU 168.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-08-08T23:59:59.000Z

155

Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) Plan for Corrective Action Unit 357: Mud Pits and Waste Dump, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Record of Technical Change No. 1  

SciTech Connect

This Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) plan was prepared as a characterization and closure report for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 357, Mud Pits and Waste Dump, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. The CAU consists of 14 Corrective Action Sites (CASs) located in Areas 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). All of the CASs are found within Yucca Flat except CAS 25-15-01 (Waste Dump). Corrective Action Site 25-15-01 is found in Area 25 in Jackass Flat. Of the 14 CASs in CAU 357, 11 are mud pits, suspected mud pits, or mud processing-related sites, which are by-products of drilling activities in support of the underground nuclear weapons testing done on the NTS. Of the remaining CASs, one CAS is a waste dump, one CAS contains scattered lead bricks, and one CAS has a building associated with Project 31.2. All 14 of the CASs are inactive and abandoned. Clean closure with no further action of CAU 357 will be completed if no contaminants are detected above preliminary action levels. A closure report will be prepared and submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for review and approval upon completion of the field activities. Record of Technical Change No. 1 is dated 3/2004.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-06-25T23:59:59.000Z

156

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 The Department's Revised Implementation Plan (IP) for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-3 renews the Department's commitment to maintaining the technical capability necessary to safely manage and operate defense nuclear facilities. Retaining highly qualified employees in critical technical skills areas is vital to the maintenance of these technical capabilities. The Department has therefore committed in the revised R? to the development of a model that offices can use to proactively manage and preserve critical technical capabilities. During the

157

Questions and answers based on revised 10 CFR Part 20  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NUREG/CR-6204 is a collection of questions and answers that were originally issued in seven sets and which pertain to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions came from both outside and within the NRC. The answers were compiled and provided by NRC staff within the offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Research, the Office of State Programs, and the five regional offices. Although all of the questions and answers have been reviewed by attorneys in the NRC Office of the General Counsel, they do not constitute official legal interpretations relevant to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions and answers do, however, reflect NRC staff decisions and technical options on aspects of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 regulatory requirements. This NUREG is being made available to encourage communication among the public, industry, and NRC staff concerning the major revisions of the NRC`s standards for protection against radiation.

Borges, T.; Stafford, R.S.; Lu, P.Y. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Carter, D. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2008 May 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2008 Document Status on 04-25-2008 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 Technical Standards Newsletter - May 2008 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008 Technical Standards Newsletter - February 2008

159

Specific PVMaT R and D in CdTe Product Manufacturing; Phase II Annual Subcontract Technical Report; May 1999--September 2000  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Just prior to the beginning of Phase II of the PVMaT project Solar Cells, Inc, (SCI) and True North Partners of Scottsdale, AZ, formed a joint venture partnership name First Solar, LLC. By the end of 1999, this event resulted in the construction of a new major manufacturing plant for photovoltaic modules, based on cadmium telluride, located in Perrysburg, a suburb of Toledo, Ohio. This plant was designed to be capable of producing PV modules at a rate of 100 MW per year within about three years. Significantly, a new semiconductor coating system, the heat of the production line, has already shown the capability of the 100 MW per year rate. These events have led to the expansion of the effort on the PVMaT project that included the former SCI team in Toledo, Ohio, a new team of engineering subcontractor, Product Search, Inc., and, later, a new laser team from First Solar, both from Scottsdale, Arizona. These three teams joined in a collaborative effort on Tasks 4: Manufacturing Line Improvements, on Task 5: Product Readiness, and on Task Environmental, Health, and Safety Issues. One Task 4 goal was to address the technical issues of the failed UL 1703 qualification testing in Phase I. Completing this goal, along with module lamination improvement done in Task 5, was instrumental in the design, fabrication, and installation of a high-throughput solar finishing line. The main components of this line, also a Task 4 project, were successfully tested in module finalization on the production line. Developing a novel, single-laser scribing system was another major accomplishment. In Task 5, the major activity was improved module lamination. Progress in Tasks 4 and 5 resulted in improved modules that were submitted for UL 1703 qualification testing. In March 2000, a new encapsulation process came under development, in which the back glass cover plate is substituted by a combination of a polymer layer as a dielectric and aluminum foil as a moisture barrier. The go al of the Environmental, Health, and Safety program is to conduct an extensive review of its current programs and address issues that need improvement.

McMaster, A. (First Solar, LLC)

2001-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

160

Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review is published to inform readers of various technical activities within the Department, promote exchange of ideas, and give credit to personnel who are achieving the results. The report is presented in two parts: technical achievements and publication abstracts. The first is divided into seven sections, each of which reports on an engineering division and its specific activities related to nuclear tests, nuclear explosives, weapons, energy systems, engineering sciences, magnetic fusion, and materials fabrication.

Carr, R.B.; Denney, R.M. (eds.)

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2005 September 2005 Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2005 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - September 2005 Inside this issue: TSP Manager's Notes.................................................................................................................................... 1 The Halo Effect: American National Standards and the rest ............................................................................. 2 Standards Development for Reporting of Declarable Substances....................................................................... 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight............................................................................................................ 8 DOE Revises "Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health Into Facility

162

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Date: July 1, 2009 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 Coordination DOE-TSPP-6 Revision: 7 DOE Technical Standards Program Date: July 1, 2009 1 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE....................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Applicability .................................................................................................................1 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION...............................................................................................1

163

DOE-TSPP-06; Coordination of DOE Technical Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Date: July 2004 COORDINATION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-6 Coordination Revision: 6 Date: July 2004 DOE Technical Standards Program 2 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 3 2. DOCUMENT COORDINATION......................................................................................................3

164

Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Newsletter - August 2007 Standards Newsletter - August 2007 Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2007 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 07-27-2007 Inside this issue: DOE Standards Actions 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 Technical Standards, Newsletter-August 2007 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - October 2007

165

HNF-37489-FP Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HNF-37489-FP HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age Energy Facility Contractow Group May 3 - 8,2008 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Pmject Hanford Management CcntractOr for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC0696RL132W FLUOR, P.O. Box I000

166

ADR Revised Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

167

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

USDOE, Office of Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

technical information is disseminated..." -- from 2011 Department of Energy Strategic Plan OSTI Products. Link to larger image. Slide 3: OSTI Products For specific document or...

169

USDOE, Office of Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

technical information is disseminated..." -- from 2011 Department of Energy Strategic Plan Journal Publishers Meeting, April 30, 2012 OSTI Products For specific document or media...

170

TMS Technical Divisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

TMS BOARD OF DIRECTORS · TMS TECHNICAL DIVISIONS · COMMITTEE HOME PAGES. TOOLS AND RESOURCES. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE TOOLKIT.

171

EPRI Materials Degradation Matrix, Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Degradation Matrix (MDM) identifies knowledge gaps associated with degradation phenomena that may detrimentally affect reactor operation, reactor safety, or regulatory climate. Where gaps are identified, the MDM assesses the status of research and development (R&D) needed to resolve the knowledge gap. In addition to a general update to address new operating experience and research results, specific objectives for this revision of the MDM ...

2013-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

172

Federal Technical Capability Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Federal Technical Capability Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Home About the FTCP FTCP Topics FTCP Meetings Performance Indicator Reports Guiding Documents Qualifying Official Training Approaches FTCP Plans, Reports & Issue Papers Workforce Analysis & Staffing Site Specific Information Nuclear Executive Leadership Training General Information 2004-1 FTCP Commitments FTCP Correspondence Site Map Contact Us Quick Reference Departmental Representative to the DNFSB Facility Representative Safety System Oversight DOE Integrated Safety Management National Training Center DOE Directives Program DOE Technical Standards Program DOE Phone Book HSS Logo FTCP FTCP Topics DOE Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2006 - 2011) New Directions in Learning: Building a DOE University System May 4, 2007, the Deputy Secretary memorandum designating Karen Boardman the FTCP Chairperson.

173

NEV America: Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Technical Specification  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

be intruded upon by the batteries or other conversion materials. (16) The controllerinverter shall limit the maximum battery discharge to prevent degradation of battery life (see...

174

Standard Reference Materials Technical Specifications for ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... in providing over 400,000 NIST traceable gas standards to ... such that the sum of their natural spectra yield ... 2030 have only two holes drilled and two ...

2011-08-04T23:59:59.000Z

175

Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

1995-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

176

Technical Assistance to Developers  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This task supports the allowance of technical assistance to fuel-cell component and system developers as directed by the DOE. This task includes testing of novel materials and participation in the further development and validation of single cell test protocols. This task also covers technical assistance to DOE Working Groups, the U.S. Council for Automotive Research (USCAR) and the USCAR/DOE Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle efficiency and Energy sustainability (U.S. Drive) Fuel Cell Technology Team. Assistance includes technical validation of new fuel cell materials and methods, single cell fuel cell testing to support the development of targets and test protocols, and regular advisory participation in other working groups and reviews. This assistance is made available to PEM fuel cell developers by request and DOE Approval. The objectives are to: (1) Support technically, as directed by DOE, fuel cell component and system developers; (2) Assess fuel cell materials and components and give feedback to developers; (3) Assist the DOE Durability Working Group with the development of various new material durability Testing protocols; and (4) Provide support to the U.S. Council for Automotive Research (USCAR) and the USCAR/DOE Fuel Cell Technology Team. FY2012 specific technical objectives are: (1) Evaluate novel MPL materials; (2) Develop of startup/ shutdown protocol; (3) Test the impact of hydrophobic treatment on graphite bi-polar plates; (4) Perform complete diagnostics on metal bi-polar plates for corrosion; and (5) Participate and lead efforts in the DOE Working Groups.

Rockward, Tommy [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Borup, Rodney L. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Garzon, Fernando H. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Mukundan, Rangachary [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Spernjak, Dusan [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

177

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

178

Nuclear Maintenance Applications Center: Repair and Reconditioning Specification Guidance for AC Squirrel-Cage and Salient Pole Sync hronous Motors with Voltage Ratings of 2.3 to 13.2 kV: Revision 1 of 1000897  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The power industry is experiencing a loss of expertise as the workforce ages and some work is being outsourced to specialty suppliers. Many of the major electric motors in plants were also beginning to experience aging effects. To assist with obtaining proper motor service, EPRI published Report 1000897, Repair and Reconditioning Specification for AC Squirrel-Cage Motors with Voltage Ratings of 2.3 to 13.2 kV in 2000.

2008-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

179

DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure describes how topical committees are organized and recognized under the Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES

180

DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure describes how topical committees are organized and recognized under the Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES DOE-TSPP-11, Technical Standards Program Topical Committees - July 1, 2009

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Coal Data Publication Revision Policy  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

THEN Survey Manager determines impact: WHAT happens next to the database and in our coal reports: Respondent provides data that are clearly incorrect or revised data for any...

182

EPA Revises Emissions Estimation Methodology  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

The changes to the historical emission estimates are the result of revisions to the data and estimation ... b K.D . Smythe, RAND ... RAND Environmental Science and ...

183

PHYSICS LAB: TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES 1999  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Most Recent Technical Activities, "Technical Activities 1999" - NISTIR 6438. TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES 1999. This report summarizes ...

184

PHYSICS LAB: TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES 1998  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Most Recent Technical Activities, TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES 1998 - NISTIR NISTIR 6268. TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES 1998. ...

185

APS Technical Update Index  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Updates Technical Updates are notices that share beamline technical and operations developments with APS users. For additional information contact the APS User Technical Interface....

186

Office of Technical Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Director's Perspective Welcome to the Office of Technical Guidance Edith A. Chalk, Director Welcome to the Office of Technical Guidance. The Office of Technical Guidance...

187

Design and Fabrication of Low-Voltage Metal-Enclosed AC Power Circuit Breaker Switchgear COMPLETE REVISION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In an effort to minimize the cost of process industry facilities, this Practice has been prepared from the technical requirements in the existing standards of major industrial users, contractors, or standards organizations. By harmonizing these technical requirements into a single set of Practices, administrative, application, and engineering costs to both the purchaser and the manufacturer should be reduced. While this Practice is expected to incorporate the majority of requirements of most users, individual applications may involve requirements that will be appended to and take precedence over this Practice. Determinations concerning fitness for purpose and particular matters or application of the Practice to particular project or engineering situations should not be made solely on information contained in these materials. The use of trade names from time to time should not be viewed as an expression of preference but rather recognized as normal usage in the trade. Other brands having the same specifications are equally correct and may be substituted for those named. All Practices or guidelines are intended to be consistent with applicable laws and regulations including OSHA requirements. To the extent these Practices or guidelines should conflict with OSHA or other applicable laws or regulations, such laws or regulations must be followed. Consult an appropriate professional before applying or acting on any material contained in or suggested by the Practice. This Practice is subject to revision at any time by the responsible Function Team and will be reviewed every 5 years. This Practice will be revised, reaffirmed, or withdrawn. Information on whether this Practice has been revised may be found at www.pip.org.

Pip Elssg

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Civilian radioactive waste management program plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This revision of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program Plan describes the objectives of the Civilian Radioactive Waste management Program (Program) as prescribed by legislative mandate, and the technical achievements, schedule, and costs planned to complete these objectives. The Plan provides Program participants and stakeholders with an updated description of Program activities and milestones for fiscal years (FY) 1998 to 2003. It describes the steps the Program will undertake to provide a viability assessment of the Yucca Mountain site in 1998; prepare the Secretary of Energy`s site recommendation to the President in 2001, if the site is found to be suitable for development as a repository; and submit a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2002 for authorization to construct a repository. The Program`s ultimate challenge is to provide adequate assurance to society that an operating geologic repository at a specific site meets the required standards of safety. Chapter 1 describes the Program`s mission and vision, and summarizes the Program`s broad strategic objectives. Chapter 2 describes the Program`s approach to transform strategic objectives, strategies, and success measures to specific Program activities and milestones. Chapter 3 describes the activities and milestones currently projected by the Program for the next five years for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project; the Waste Acceptance, Storage and Transportation Project; ad the Program Management Center. The appendices present information on the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, and the Energy Policy Act of 1992; the history of the Program; the Program`s organization chart; the Commission`s regulations, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in geologic Repositories; and a glossary of terms.

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

Technical Brief  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ii iiiFOREWARD The Depleted Uranium Technical Brief is designed to convey available information and knowledge about depleted uranium to EPA Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other Agency managers involved with the remediation of sites contaminated with this material. It addresses relative questions regarding the chemical and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological health hazard. It provides accepted data and references to additional sources for both the radiological and chemical characteristics, health risk as well as references for both the monitoring and measurement and applicable treatment techniques for depleted uranium. Please Note: This document has been changed from the original publication dated

Depleted Uranium; Brian Littleton

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Responsibilities - August Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as DOEComponents") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

191

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates for 1964-1965 and verification of the 1963 predictions October 1964 Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL #12;REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates - #12;SUMMARY On the basis of information available in June 1964, new estimates of the levels of fallout

192

Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Update Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Technical Update Meeting - Summer 2012 on AddThis.com... About Take Action to Save Energy Partner With DOE Activities Solar Decathlon Building America Research Innovations Research Tools Building Science Education Climate-Specific Guidance

193

Revised (05/06)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste. Submit Copy 1, 2, and 3 to DOE, Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center and retain Copy 4.

194

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

195

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures The following procedures should be used to write, revise, or maintain a DOE technical standard. They are also used to convert a DOE technical standard to a non-government standard or to form a topical committee. TSPP September 2013 September 16, 2013 DOE-TSPP-1-2013, Program Overview and Responsibilities This procedure describes the responsibilities of persons who are charged with implementing the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP). September 16, 2013 DOE-TSPP-2-2013, Initiating DOE Technical Standards This procedure provides guidance on how to establish and justify the need for a Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standard and register a DOE

196

2013-2014 Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 2013 – 2014 Additions and Revisions are now available with seven new methods, including three for testing 3-MCPD, and revisions to 25 previously approved methods. 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Hardback Books Methods - Analyses Books Methods - An

197

Chapter 5. Technical Notes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... OOF: Finite Element Analysis of Microstructures. Table of Contents, Chapter 5. Technical Notes, OOF home. ... Chapter 5. Technical Notes. ...

2013-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

198

NCSL International Technical Exchange  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NCSL International Technical Exchange. Purpose: The NCSL International ... Charleston, SC 29418. Technical Contact: Val Miller (301) 975-3602.

2013-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

199

Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Revision to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Standards Development...

200

NIST Physics Laboratory: Technical Activities 2000  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Most Recent Technical Activities, Technical Activities 2000 - NISTIR 6590. TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES 2000. ... Most Recent Technical Activities ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Reference: Revised Tariff Sheet  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Company (TrAILCo), a revised tariff sheet to correct the FERC Form No. 1 line reference in TrAILCo’s formula rate. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the Director, Division of Electric Power Regulation- East, under 18 C.F.R. § 375.307, your submittal filed in the above referenced docket is accepted for filing, effective May 17, 2010, as requested. 1 Notice of the filing was published in the Federal Register, with comments, protests, or interventions due on or before June 3, 2010. No protests or adverse comments were filed. American Municipal Power, Inc. and PJM Interconnection, LLC filed timely motions to intervene. Notices of intervention and unopposed timely filed motions to intervene are granted pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 C.F.R. § 385.214). Any opposed or untimely filed motion to intervene is governed by the provisions of Rule 214. This acceptance for filing shall not be construed as constituting approval of any rate, charge, classification or any rule, regulation, or practice affecting such rate or 1

Stephen Angle Esq; Dear Mr. Angle; Jignasa P. Gadani

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

DOE-TSPP-6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards 6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure provides guidance for approving and issuing the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as Technical Standards Program (TSP) participants) working to the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program. DOE-TSPP-6-2013, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-7-2013, Maintaining DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-6, Coordination of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009

203

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

204

Preference revision via declarative debugging  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Preference criteria are rarely static. Often they are subject to modification and aggregation. The resulting preference criteria may not satisfy the properties of the original ones and must therefore be revised. This paper investigates the problem of ...

Pierangelo Dell’Acqua; Luís Moniz Pereira

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Extraction Utility Design Specification  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extraction Extraction Utility Design Specification May 13, 2013 Document Version 1.10 1 Revision History Date Version Section and Titles Author Summary of Change January 15, 2010 1.0 All Eric Morgan, Dekker, Ltd. Initial Draft Document January 19, 2010 1.1 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Document update with EM team review notes January 20, 2010 1.2 2.1.1 EM Project Team Document Review January 27, 2010 1.3 All Bruce Bartells Final Draft Review May 10, 2010 1.4.1 2.8 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Section Update May 14, 2010 1.4.2 2.3.1 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. System Tables Added May 17, 2010 1.4.3 2.3 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Enhancements Update June 29, 2010 1.5 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Revised for Version

206

NISTIR 7275 Revision 3, Specification for the Extensible ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... and guidelines for the cost-effective security ... over the same systems across their operational lifetimes ... that can be a standalone XCCDF document ...

2012-02-29T23:59:59.000Z

207

Argonne TDC: Technical Services Agreemens  

Technical Services Agreements with Industrial Partners . Argonne researchers provide short-term technical assistance to companies with technical problems requiring ...

208

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-11  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Revision: 2 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. ORGANIZATION OF TOPICAL COMMITTEES .......................................................................... 1

209

Technical Baseline Summary Description for the Tank Farm Contractor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is a revision of the document titled above, summarizing the technical baseline of the Tank Farm Contractor. It is one of several documents prepared by CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. to support the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Tank Waste Retrieval and Disposal Mission at Hanford.

TEDESCHI, A.R.

2000-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

210

Sponsoring Organizations | Scientific and Technical Information Program  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Sponsoring Organizations Sponsoring Organizations Print page Print page Email page Email page U.S. Department of Energy Sponsoring Organizations for DOE-funded Scientific and Technical Information (STI) (Reference DOE O 241.1B, Scientific and Technical Information Management, Section 4 REQUIREMENTS, item g) The following list includes the current USDOE Sponsoring Organizations identified as funding research and development and other technology activities which result in scientific and technical information. DOE Program Offices and the Program Offices' respective subprogram(s) which may fund research are included. This list will be revised as needed to include additional offices or to reflect current Departmental funding organizations. Questions or input may be provided to stip@osti.gov. Current

211

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) These Greensburg fact sheet sheets help citizens understand what they can do as a part of the focus. Saving energy & water, using renewable energy (particular interest in small wind), driving "green", general sustainability, & living green. 45138.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE (Fact Sheet) Rebuilding Greensburg, Kansas, as a Model Green Community: A Case Study; NREL's Technical Assistance to Greensburg, June 2007-May 2009 From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding with Renewable Energy after Disaster,

212

Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments DRAFT OMB CIRCULAR A-76 (NOVEMBER 14, 2002) REVIEW COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS: The Department of Energy (DOE) supports the overarching goal of OMB Circular A-76 that agencies should obtain "the best deal to the Taxpayer." We also support revisions to the Circular that "Keep the Process Moving" with the end result being: Faster/Cheaper Competitions; Improved Performance and Measures; Enhanced/Expanded Competition; Fairness; Realizing Significant Savings; and the Redirection of Resources to Mission Critical Requirements. Upon review of the draft Circular, the Department believes the proposed changes to Circular reflect a general improvement over the current version. The Department does, however, have

213

Revisions to WTC Investigation Plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... There were many comments related to the Research and Development (R&D) Program and the Dissemination and Technical Assistance Program ...

2011-08-12T23:59:59.000Z

214

Technical Safety Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Requirements Safety Requirements FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: Contractor has developed, maintained, and received DOE Field Office Approval for the necessary operating conditions of a facility. The facility has also maintained an inventory of safety class and safety significant systems and components. REQUIREMENTS: ď‚· 10 CFR 830.205, Nuclear Safety Rule. ď‚· DOE-STD-3009-2002, Preparation Guide for U. S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses. ď‚· DOE-STD-1186-2004, Specific Administrative Controls. Guidance: ď‚· DOE G 423.1-1, Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Technical Safety Requirements. ď‚· NSTP 2003-1, Use of Administrative Controls for Specific Safety Functions. Performance Objective 1: Contractor Program Documentation

215

Development of mirror specifications  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The work performed by PNL for Sandia Laboratories under a contract titled Survey and Analysis of Mirror Silvering Technology and Heliostat Glass Evaluation is described. The primary purpose for the work was to develop specifications that will enhance the durability and lifetime of heliostat mirrors. The contract was initiated with a technical survey of the present commercial silvered glass mirror industry and an analytical investigation of the degradation phenomena experienced by the heliostat mirrors at Sandia's Livermore test facility. The main thrust was to evaluate the present methods of silver deposition and protection in order to recommend a specification for the heliostat mirror silvering process that would extend the lifetime of the Barstow mirror field. In addition, several advanced concepts for enhancing mirror lifetime were investigated. Technical and measurement support for evaluation of the Barstow heliostat glass and updating the glass specification was also provided. (WHK)

Lind, M.A.

1979-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department’s Revised Implementation Plan (IP) for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-3 renews the Department’s commitment to maintaining the technical capability...

217

DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure outlines the process for registering a project to develop a DOE Technical Standard, to perform certain periodic updates (revisions, reaffirmations, inactivations for new design, and reinstatements) to DOE Technical Standards, or to register a person's or organization's intent to work with a non-Government standards body to prepare or revise a non-Government standard. The procedure also describes the approval process required before a project can be registered. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories

218

DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 , Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-4, Registering a Technical Standard Project - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure outlines the process for registering a project to develop a DOE Technical Standard, to perform certain periodic updates (revisions, reaffirmations, inactivations for new design, and reinstatements) to DOE Technical Standards, or to register a person's or organization's intent to work with a non-Government standards body to prepare or revise a non-Government standard. The procedure also describes the approval process required before a project can be registered. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories

219

EMC 2007: Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technical Program Overview. Technical sessions commence with the plenary session on Wednesday, June 20 at 8:20 a.m., in the Leighton Concert Hall of the  ...

220

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for the routine maintenance of DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for the routine maintenance of DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-9, Maintenance of DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009 MAINTENANCE OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS

222

DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for approving and issuing DOE Technical Standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications APPROVING AND ISSUING DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS DOE-TSPP-8, Approving and Issuing DOE Technical Standards - July 1, 2009

223

DOE-TSPP-9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees 9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees DOE-TSPP-9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure describes how topical committees are organized and recognized under the Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as TSP participants) working to the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program. DOE-TSPP-9-2013, DOE Technical Standards Program Topical Committees More Documents & Publications TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM TOPICAL COMMITTEES DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus

224

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 2 of 25 Page intentionally left blank ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 3 of 25 Chemical Sciences Division ISM Plan May 2012 Page 1.0 Policy Statement 5 2.0 Description of Division/Organization, Mission and Scope of Work 5 3.0 Accountability 7 3.01 Line Management Responsibility and Accountability 8 3.02 Specific Principal Investigator Responsibilities 8 3.03 Work Lead EH&S Responsibilities 8 3.04 CSD personnel EH&S Responsibilities (Non-Supervisor or Work Lead) 9 3.05 Students 10 3.06 Work Off-Site 10 3.07 Telecommuting 11

225

OA-50 Technical Qualification Program Standard Procedure, October...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

completion of the TQP entails satisfying all competencies contained in the General Technical Base, assigned primary Functional Area and OfficeFacility Specific Qualification...

226

FRVT 2002: Technical Appendices  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. Technical Appendices Sponsors and Supporters: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Department of ...

227

Business and Technical Resources  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Business and Technical Resources. Small Business Administration. The SBA provides information on programs for starting ...

2012-06-19T23:59:59.000Z

228

Technical Guidelines Development Committee  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (TGDC). The TGDC has been chartered by the US Election Assistance ...

2012-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

229

Bioconversion of plant biomass to ethanol. Annual report and revised research plan, January 1977--January 1978  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objective of this research is to demonstrate on a laboratory scale the technical feasibility of the direct microbial conversion of pretreated wood to ethanol. During the first year of this contract, we investigated the feasibility of biologically delignifying wood with C. pruinosum and directly fermenting the pretreated wood to ethanol with a mixed culture. Bench-top fermentations of a thermophilic bacillus growing on glucose and of a mixed culture of thermophilic sporocytophaga (US) and a thermophilic bacillus growing on microcrystalline and amorphous cellulose were evaluated for growth and ethanol production. In the mixed culture fermentation of amorphous and microcrystalline cellulose, the specific rate of substrate depletion was calculated to be 0.087 hr/sup -1/ and 0.0346 hr/sup -1/, respectively. However, defining the growth requirements of C. pruinosum and sporocytophaga (US) proved more difficult than originally anticipated. In order to achieve the program objectives within the contract period, a revised research plan was developed based upon chemical pretreatment and the direct fermentation of pretreated hardwood to ethanol. In place of the biological delignification pretreatment step, we have substituted a chemically supplemented steam pretreatment step to partially delignify wood and to enhance its accessibility to microbial utilization. Clostridium thermocellum, which ferments cellulose directly to ethanol and acetic acid, has replaced the mixed culture fermentation stage for ethanol production. Research on the production of ethanol from xylose by the thermophilic bacillus ZB-B2 is retained as one means of utilizing the hemicellulose fraction of hardwood. Work on the genetic improvement of the ethanol yields of both cultures by suppressing acetic acid production is also retained. The rationale, experimental approach, and economic considerations of this revised research plan are also presented.

Brooks, R.E.; Bellamy, W.D.; Su, T.M.

1978-03-23T23:59:59.000Z

230

Infrared Thermography Guide (Revision 3)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Costly equipment outages can be reduced by implementing a comprehensive predictive maintenance program. Infrared thermography (IR), a fundamental component of such programs, uses nonintrusive techniques to monitor the operating condition of equipment and components. This revised report provides updated information to assist utilities in implementing an effective IR program.

2002-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

231

Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision of Chapter 11, Contracting Officer's Representative SUMMARY: The...

232

2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Additions and revisions (new, updated, or revised methods) are included in print form. Corrections (minor typographical errors) are included in an accompanying CD-ROM. 2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions DVD & CD-ROMs Soft Bound Books Methods - An

233

DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, , Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure describes the responsibilities of persons who are charged with implementing the DOE Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000

234

DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure describes the responsibilities of persons who are charged with implementing the DOE Technical Standards Program. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-1, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - July 1, 2009

235

DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary -2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs). This procedure applies to all Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as Technical Standards Program (TSP) participants) working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program. DOE-TSPP-8-2013, Converting DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards

236

DOE-TSPP-6, Coordination of DOE Technical Standards - July 2004 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2004 2004 DOE-TSPP-6, Coordination of DOE Technical Standards - July 2004 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - July 26, 2004 This procedure provides guidance on the formal coordination of DOE Technical Standards in the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP). The purpose of coordination of draft technical standards is to solicit and receive comments from interested persons and organizations in order to improve and correct technical standards. DOE Technical Standards are coordinated through the electronic RevCom for TSP process. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, integrating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical

237

Building America House Simulation Protocols (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

House House Simulation Protocols Robert Hendron and Cheryn Engebrecht National Renewable Energy Laboratory Revised October 2010 Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory For the U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program ii NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process,

238

FAR Card: Technical specifiers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

specifiers specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product."

239

Revised Industry Steam Generator Program Generic License Change Package  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

License Change Package for NRC review and endorsement. Industry events during the subsequent months have delayed the NRC review and presented an opportunity for the industry to improve the submittal. A summary of the major changes from the February submittal is provided in Enclosure 1. The resulting package (Enclosures 2 through 8), which supercedes the earlier version in its entirety, is enclosed for your endorsement. Although the events of the last ten months have resulted in some changes to the industry steam generator program guidance, the fundamental principles remain sound. Equally as important, the program has demonstrated its resiliency. The steam generator program guidance is designed to accommodate new knowledge and experience, and that is precisely what is occurring. The enclosed Generic License Change Package includes changes that reflect recent experience. In addition, the appropriate underlying technical documents are currently being revised or supplemental guidance is being developed as necessary to reflect new information. The industry and the NRC worked diligently to address the technical and licensing issues that ultimately resulted in the February 2000 version of the Steam Generator Program Generic License Change Package. Although these documents have been revised since the previous submittal, the differences do not represent a change in our position on the issues.

David J. Modeen; Mr. Samuel; J. Collins; U. S. Nuclear; Regulatory Commission; Xuo Mr; Samuel J. Collins

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at Hanford. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 835, DOELAP, DOE-RL, ORP, PNSO, and Hanford contractor requirements. The dosimetry system is operated by PNNL’s Hanford External Dosimetry Program (HEDP) which provides dosimetry services to all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee (HPDAC) which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture (ERICA) database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2009-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Senior Technical Safety Manager  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Program Technical Program Manager Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1178-2004 May 2013 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program. Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to the Office of Leadership and Career Manager, Technical Qualification Program (TQP), Albuquerque Complex. This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... ii

242

RPP-RPT-42583 Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

RPP-RPT-42583 RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published October 2009 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 ~. washington river ~ protectionso/utions P.O. Box 850 Richland, Washington Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK

243

Clean Air Act. Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. This Reference Book has been completely revised and is current through February 15, 1994.

Not Available

1994-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

244

Consumer price index revision electricity workbook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since electricity is considered one of the more difficult ELIs to price, the Revision Electricity Workbook has been developed to serve as a reference for Economic Assistants when pricing and initiating electricity quotes. As there are relatively few outlets available, (typically one per PSU), and electricity is published for each publication area, any error made when pricing electricity can seriously impact the CPI. To best utilize this workbook, read through it entirely and review the examples found in Section IV. The `Industry Overview` and `Electricity Sampling` sections provide background information that may be useful when interacting with the respondent. The `Specifications Review` section contains detailed descriptions of the checklist specifications as well as examples of how to correctly complete certain specification elements. Examples of how to handle rate schedules, complicated tax structures, refunds, etc., are grouped together in Section IV. The `Initiation` section provides procedural guidelines which must be used during initiation. The final section in the workbook outlines the procedures to be used when pricing CPI/PPI Overlap outlets (companies which participate in both the CPI and PPI surveys). As stated above, this workbook is to be used as a reference guide. If a situation arises that is not covered in this workbook, please contact your regional office for assistance.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers (TIO) serve as the principal DOE or NNSA office point of contact and assistant to, and liaison with, the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) that serves as the Department's office charged with the Scientific and Technical Information Program (STIP). The TIOs are to be familiar with the STI Programs within their Office they represent (given they have contracting financial assistance and/or acquisition activities) and for their major site/facility management contractor(s) STI Program to discern compliance with the DOE O 241.1B. They must maintain an up-to-date knowledge-base of the STI Program activities and provide timely feedback on issues as they emerge. While

246

Proposed License Amendments "Revised Pressure/Temperature (P/T) Curves, and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(FPL) requests that Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 and DPR-41 for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 be amended to extend the heatup, cooldown, and inservice test limitations for the Reactor Coolant System (RCS). The present pressure/temperature (P/T) limits specified in Technical Specification (TS) 3/4.4.9, and in TS Figures 3.4-2, 3.4-3 and 3.4-4 apply for operation up to 19 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY). The proposed amendments will extend the service period for the new P/T limits to a maximum of 32 EFPY. The proposed amendments also revise TS 3.4.9.3, Cold Overpressure Mitigation System (COMS) setpoints. COMS is the Westinghouse version of Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP). The maximum permissible Power Operated Relief Valve (PORV) setpoint for low temperature operation of the RCS is being changed from 415 + 15 psig to < 561 psig, which includes instrument uncertainty of 70 psig, as a result of the P/T limit changes. The enable temperature for the

In Accordance Cfr; Florida Power; Light Company

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

Technical Value Center  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Identifies opportunities to increase awareness and utilization of AOCS Technical Services activities and products. Technical Value Center AOCS History and Governance about us aocs committees contact us division council fats governing board history

248

FAR Card: Technical specifiers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't...

249

Participating in the U.S. Department of Energy Revised "1605(b)" Program for the Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Guide for U.S. Electric Companies  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

EPRI prepared this Technical Update report to provide staff of EPRI member electric companies and other interested parties a better understanding of the new requirements and methodologies embodied in the revised 1605(b) program guidelines and insight into some of the potential strategic benefits and risks associated with participating in the revised program in the future.

2007-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

250

NIST Technical Note XXXX  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Technical Note 1621 Optical Radiation Measurements Based on Detector Standards George P. Eppeldauer, Editor Page 2. ...

2010-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

251

NBS TECHNICAL NOTE 674  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NBS TECHNICAL NOTE 674 Page 2. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards ...

2002-08-19T23:59:59.000Z

252

Technical Committee Member - TMS  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Volunteer Training Module. March 2013. 1. Your Professional Partner for Career Advancement. Technical Committee Member. Online Training Module.

253

Legend Technical Services, Inc.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Legend Technical Services, Inc. NVLAP Lab Code: 102081-0. Address and Contact Information: 88 Empire Drive St. Paul ...

2013-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

254

Johns Manville Technical Center  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Johns Manville Technical Center. NVLAP Lab Code: 100425-0. Address and Contact Information: 10100 West Ute Avenue ...

2013-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

255

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers: Serve as the DOE element representatives to STIP and ensure that STI objectives and requirements are incorporated into strategic planning, management information plans, life-cycle procedures from project initiation to close-out, and contract language as appropriate. Coordinate with contractor STI managers and have adequate familiarity with STI activities to discern contractor compliance with the CRD portion of this directive. Coordinate the implementation of appropriate review and release procedures by DOE elements, DOE contractors, and financial assistance recipients as appropriate. Serve as Releasing Officials or coordinate designation and official

256

Technical Qualification Program Description - Integrated Support Center, Chicago Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPART ENT of Office of DEPART ENT of Office of ENERGY I Science Integrated Support Center Chicago Office Technical Qualification Program Description ~~~~~~'?ÂŁH(.k:1/Zi.':"r'fl. ; ;!. / ; h tJ/ tl oxa nn e E. Purucker, M anager ~ Office of Science - Chicago Office Technical Qualification Program Description Revision 2, November 2010 CONCURRENCE The Office of Science-Chicago Office (SC-CH) is the sponsor for this Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Description. This is applicable to SC-CH, New Brunswick Laboratory (NBLL Ames Site Office (AMSO) and Argonne Site Office (ASO). These offices are in joint participation and endorsement of the SC-CH Technical Qualification Program process and have also provided concurrence below. The SC-CH Manager is the approval authority for this program description.

257

GENERAL TECHNICAL BASELINE QUALIFICATION STANDARD SUGGESTED STUDY REFERENCES  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References 2007 revision This list provides suggested study references for the technical competencies of the General Technical Base Qualification Standard (DOE STD 1146-2007). More comprehensive resources are available through the DOE Online Learning Center's training courses and the study guides available through the Federal Technical Capability Panel web site. The Uniform Resource Locaters for these sites are listed in the Standard. This list is arranged by Technical Competency, followed by the suggested reference source. Some competencies deal directly with DOE or Federal directives, and they are also the reference. In a few cases, the Study Guide is the only concise source, and appropriate sections are listed.

258

DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance on how to determine if a technical standard is needed. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government

259

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs), also referred to as non-Government standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government

260

DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - July 1, 2009 This procedure provides guidance on how to determine if a technical standard is needed. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-2, Establishing the Need for a Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 CONVERSION OF DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS TO NON-GOVERNMENT STANDARDS

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

DOE-TSPP-4-2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards -2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-4-2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - September 16, 2013 This procedure provides guidance for developing the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the Standards Developing Organization (SDO). The DOE representative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as Technical Standards Program (TSP) participants) working to the latest revision of DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards

262

Extraction Utility Design Specification  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extraction Utility Extraction Utility Design Specification January 11, 2011 Document Version 1.9 1 Revision History Date Version Section and Titles Author Summary of Change January 15, 2010 1.0 All Eric Morgan, Dekker, Ltd. Initial Draft Document January 19, 2010 1.1 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Document update with EM team review notes January 20, 2010 1.2 2.1.1 EM Project Team Document Review January 27, 2010 1.3 All Bruce Bartells Final Draft Review May 10, 2010 1.4.1 2.8 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Section Update May 14, 2010 1.4.2 2.3.1 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. System Tables Added May 17, 2010 1.4.3 2.3 Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Enhancements Update June 29, 2010 1.5 All Igor Pedan, Dekker, Ltd. Revised for Version 8.0.20100628 July 14, 2010 1.5.1 2.8 Igor Pedan,

263

Double Shell Tank (DST) Monitor and Control Subsystem Specification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This specification revises the performance requirements and provides references to the requisite codes and standards to be applied during design of the Double-Shell Tank (DST) Monitor and Control Subsystem that supports the first phase of Waste Feed Delivery.

BAFUS, R.R.

2000-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

264

2009 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

O. Box 5400 O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 The Honorable A.I. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: MAR 1 9 2009 Enclosed is the Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1. This plan has been updated to identify that all Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE's mission have been completed. This revised

265

2007 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7,2007 7,2007 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004-290 1 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, Revision 2, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1. This plan has been updated to identify the completed and remaining Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE'S mission. The plan is approved and issued for implementation, effective

266

Technical Basis for DOE Policy 420.1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HS-0006 HS-0006 TECHNICAL BASIS FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NUCLEAR SAFETY POLICY, DOE POLICY 420.1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY OFFICE OF NUCLEAR SAFETY JULY 2011 i Executive Summary This document provides the technical basis for the Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 420.1, Nuclear Safety Policy, dated 2-8-2011. It includes an analysis of the revised Policy to determine whether it provides the necessary and sufficient high-level expectations that will lead DOE to establish and implement appropriate requirements to assure protection of the public, workers, and the environment from the hazards of DOE's operation of nuclear facilities. In developing the revised Policy and performing this analysis, DOE reviewed the current Nuclear

267

ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Policy Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and othercollaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts. ADR Revised Policy More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

268

Advanced Manufacturing Office: Technical Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assistance on Twitter Bookmark Advanced Manufacturing Office: Technical Assistance on Google Bookmark Advanced Manufacturing Office: Technical Assistance on Delicious Rank...

269

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resources Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Education and Training Energy Resource Library Funding Opportunities Military Initiative Newsletter Roundtables START Program...

270

Steam Generator Management Program: PWR Primary-to-Secondary Leak Guidelines Revision 4  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Primary-to-secondary leakage of steam generator tubes in PWRs can result from mechanisms that propagate slowly or rapidly. Control room operators rely on online data for a rapid assessment of tube leakage conditions to ensure that the plant is maneuvered safely and to minimize the risk of tube rupture. Industry experts prepared and reviewed these revised guidelines to incorporate recent industry operating experience and technology improvements and to review the technical bases for action levels. This rep...

2011-09-12T23:59:59.000Z

271

NIST Leads Revision of International Coordinate Measuring ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Leads Revision of International Coordinate Measuring Machine Standard. ... ASME) represents the final step in a decade-long effort led by the ...

2011-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

272

,"Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases "  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases ",36,"Annual",2011,"6302009" ,"Release...

273

,"Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases "  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases ",36,"Annual",2011,"6302009" ,"Release...

274

Revision to the Canada Country Analysis Brief  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Revision to the Canada Country Analysis Brief. December 10, 2012. Text incorrectly implied that Encana is developing another major natural gas project off ...

275

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at Hanford. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 835, DOELAP, DOE-RL, ORP, PNSO, and Hanford contractor requirements. The dosimetry system is operated by PNNL’s Hanford External Dosimetry Program (HEDP) which provides dosimetry services to all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee (HPDAC) which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. Rev. 0 marks the first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture (ERICA) database. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Revision Log: Rev. 0 (2/25/2005) Major revision and expansion. Rev. 0.1 (3/12/2007) Minor revision. Updated Chapters 5, 6 and 9 to reflect change in default ring calibration factor used in HEDP dose calculation software. Factor changed from 1.5 to 2.0 beginning January 1, 2007. Pages on which changes were made are as follows: 5.23, 5.69, 5.78, 5.80, 5.82, 6.3, 6.5, 6.29, 9.2.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2007-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

276

Revision D to 2006 AOP Renewal Statement of Basis For Hanford Site Air Operating Permit No. 00-05-006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Statement of Basis (Statement) is issued by the permitting agencies as a separate supporting reference document to the Hanford Air Operating Permit (AOP). The Statement sets forth the legal and factual basis for the AOP conditions, and is not intended for enforcement purposes. The Statement includes references to the applicable statutory or regulatory provisions, technical supporting information on specific emission units, and clarifications of specific requirements. [Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-401-700(8)] In 1990, U.S. Congress amended the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). One change was to create air operating permits for industrial sources of air pollution (codified in Title 5 of the CAA). Prior to the creation of these permits, facility managers, regulators and the public had to look through many separate requirements to find those that applied to a certain facility. An air operating permit brings all applicable requirements into one place and requires the manager of the source to certify that it complies with all the applicable requirements. Further, the burden of proof for compliance changed from the regulating agencies to the sources. In 1991, the Washington State Legislature updated the Washington Clean Air Act [Chapter 70.94 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW)] to make it consistent with the new federal program. In 1993, Ecology developed Washington’s operating permits regulation to comply with federal

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

277

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

278

Expedited Technology Demonstration Project Baseline Revision 3.0  

SciTech Connect

The Expedited Technology Demonstration Project Plan, MWNT Revised Baseline 3.0, replaces and significantly modifies the current baseline. The revised plan will focus efforts specifically on the demonstration of an integrated Molten Salt Oxidation (MSO) system. In addition to the MSO primary unit, offgas, and salt recycle subsystems, the demonstrations will include the generation of robust final forms from process mineral residues. A simplified process flow chart for the expedited demonstration is shown. To minimize costs and to accelerate the schedule for deployment, the integrated system will be staged in an existing facility at LLNL equipped to handle hazardous and radioactive materials. The MSO systems will be activated in FY97, followed by the activation of final forms in FY98.

Adamson, M.G.; Densley, P.J.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Technical Review Panel Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Evaluation and Identification of future R&D on eight Advanced Reactor Concepts, conducted April - September 2012 December 2012 Public release version 2 Public release version 3 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the Technical Review Panel Process ............................................................... 5 2. Technical Review Panel Criteria ......................................................................................... 6 3. Concept Summaries ........................................................................................................... 8

280

Web Survey Technical Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Glisson,W.B. Welland,R.C. DCS Technical Report Series pp 27 Dept of Computing Science, University of Glasgow

Glisson, W.B.; Welland, R.C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

EMC 2011 Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Each technical area is being organized by a committee. Visit the organizers page for a list of the organizers' names. Energy Conversion and Storage Materials

282

TMS 2011: Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

TMS 2011: Technical Program: Materials and Society: Energy and ... by utilizing all available energy sources including solar and stored energy in the form of ...

283

Superalloys 2012: Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Apr. 2012: Authors Notified of Oral/Interactive Status ... on Sunday evening, followed by technical sessions and presentations of both oral and interactive posters ...

284

EMC 2006: Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technical Program Overview. Electronic materials relate to, are produced, or are operated by the controlled flow of electrons through a semiconductor, a gas, ...

285

ICME 2011: Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

ICME 2011: Technical Program July 10-14, 2011 • Seven Springs Mountain Resort • Seven Springs, PA. All presentations will be held in the Exhibit Hall.

286

TMS 2012: Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

TMS 2012: Technical Program: High Performance Materials March 11-15, 2012 • Orlando, FL. Among the myriad challenges to be explored in this track of the ...

287

EMC 2010 Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The technical program commences with the plenary session on Wednesday, June 23 at 8:30 a.m. The plenary session will be held in Jordan Auditorium, ...

288

Revised noise criteria for design and rating of HVAC systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper reviews current methods of rating the noise produced by HVAC systems and explains why these ratings fail to be correlated with subjective opinion in many cases. An entirely new method of assigning noise ratings is proposed which is expected to provide a significantly better correlation between objective measurements and subjective response. The proposed new rating method makes use of a revised set of noise criterion curves (RC curves) which appeared for the first time in Chap. 35 of the 1980 Systems Volume of the ASHRAE Handbook. This paper also discusses the technical considerations leading to the development of the RC curves as a replacement for the NC curves which have been used in the past.

Warren E. Blazier Jr.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Transportation system requirements document. Revision 1 DCN01. Supplement  

SciTech Connect

The original Transportation System Requirements Document described the functions to be performed by and the technical requirements for the Transportation System to transport spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) from Purchaser and Producer sites to a Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) site, and between CRWMS sites. The purpose of that document was to define the system-level requirements. These requirements include design and operations requirements to the extent they impact on the development of the physical segments of Transportation. The document also presented an overall description of Transportation, its functions, its segments, and the requirements allocated to the segments and the system-level interfaces with Transportation. This revision of the document contains only the pages that have been modified.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

NOxControl revised.p65  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

OCTOBER 2001 OCTOBER 2001 DOE/FE-0442 EVALUATION OF GAS REBURNING AND LOW-NO X BURNERS ON A WALL-FIRED BOILER ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATION Disclaimer This report was prepared using publicly available information, including the Final Technical Report and other reports prepared pursuant to a cooperative agreement partially funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. Neither the United States Government nor any agency, employee, contractor, or representative thereof, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial

291

BOREAS SSA-YJP Tower Flux Data Revised  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Tower Flux Data Revised A revised version of the BOREAS TF04 tower flux data is now available from the ORNL DAAC. Data providers have revised the data set entitled "BOREAS TF-04...

292

Archived Weekly Files, Revised, 1984 Forward EIA revises its first-round  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Archive weekly and monthly coal production -- revised and original estimates About coal production revision estimates EIA revises its weekly (and monthly) original estimates of state-level coal production using quarterly mine-level coal production data from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) as soon as the data are available. This method guarantees that EIAÂ’s revised coal production estimates for each past quarter conform with the MSHA survey data. The state level revised estimates include refuse coal. EIA uses this equation to revise its weekly coal production estimates: Revised weekly estimate (State A) = original EIA estimate (State A) x MSHA quarterly data (State A) Ă·

293

Agile specifications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Traditional formal methods and modern agile methods are separated more by limitations of current technology than by fundamental intellectual differences. A mixed interpreter that executes mixed programs, comprising both declarative specification statements ... Keywords: agile methods, formal methods, refinement calculus, specification statement, test-driven development

Derek Rayside; Aleksandar Milicevic; Kuat Yessenov; Greg Dennis; Daniel Jackson

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

Final Technical Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Significant progress was made in testing methods to harvest corn stover in a “single pass” harvest mode (collect corn grain and stover at the same time). This is technically feasible on small scale, but additional equipment refinements will be needed to facilitate cost effective harvest on a larger scale. Transportation models were developed, which indicate that at a corn stover yield of 2.8 tons/acre and purchase price of $35/ton stover, it would be unprofitable to transport stover more than about 25 miles; thus suggesting the development of many regional collection centers. Therefore, collection centers should be located within about 30 miles of the farm, to keep transportation costs to an acceptable level. These collection centers could then potentially do some preprocessing (to fractionate or increase bulk density) and/or ship the biomass by rail or barge to the final customers. Wet storage of stover via ensilage was tested, but no clear economic advantages were evident. Wet storage eliminates fire risk, but increases the complexity of component separation and may result in a small loss of carbohydrate content (fermentation potential). A study of possible supplier-producer relationships, concluded that a “quasi-vertical” integration model would be best suited for new bioproducts industries based on stover. In this model, the relationship would involve a multiyear supply contract (processor with purchase guarantees, producer group with supply guarantees). Price will likely be fixed or calculated based on some formula (possibly a cost plus). Initial quality requirements will be specified (but subject to refinement).Producers would invest in harvest/storage/transportation equipment and the processor would build and operate the plant. Pilot fermentation studies demonstrated dramatic improvements in yields and rates with optimization of batch fermentor parameters. Demonstrated yields and rates are approaching those necessary for profitable commercial operation for production of ethanol or lactic acid. The ability of the biocatalyst to adapt to biomass hydrolysate (both biomass sugars and toxins in the hydrolysate) was demonstrated and points towards ultimate successful commercialization of the technology. However, some of this work will need to be repeated and possibly extended to adapt the final selected biocatalyst for the specific commercial hydrolysate composition. The path from corn stover in the farm field to final products, involves a number of steps. Each of these steps has options, problems, and uncertainties; thus creating a very complex multidimensional obstacle to successful commercial development. Through the tasks of this project, the technical and commercial uncertainties of many of these steps have been addressed; thus providing for a clearer understanding of paths forward and commercial viability of a corn stover-based biorefinery.

Aristos Aristidou Natureworks); Robert Kean (NatureWorks); Tom Schechinger (IronHorse Farms, Mat); Stuart Birrell (Iowa State); Jill Euken (Wallace Foundation & Iowa State)

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, , Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for developing DOE Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the standards developing organization (SDO). The DOErepresentative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

296

DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for developing DOE Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the standards developing organization (SDO). The DOE representative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

297

DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-5, Development of a New DOE Technical Standard - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for developing DOE Technical Standards. NOTE: Development of a Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) for DOE's use will follow the rules of the standards developing organization (SDO). The DOErepresentative to the standards-writing activity represents the Department's interests during VCS development. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

298

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford site. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with requirements of 10 CFR 835, the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program, the DOE Richland Operations Office, DOE Office of River Protection, DOE Pacific Northwest Office of Science, and Hanford’s DOE contractors. The dosimetry system is operated by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Hanford External Dosimetry Program which provides dosimetry services to PNNL and all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since its inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving significant changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Maintenance and distribution of controlled hard copies of the manual by PNNL was discontinued beginning with Revision 0.2.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford site. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with requirements of 10 CFR 835, the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program, the DOE Richland Operations Office, DOE Office of River Protection, DOE Pacific Northwest Office of Science, and Hanford’s DOE contractors. The dosimetry system is operated by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Hanford External Dosimetry Program which provides dosimetry services to PNNL and all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since its inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving significant changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Maintenance and distribution of controlled hard copies of the manual by PNNL was discontinued beginning with Revision 0.2.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2011-04-04T23:59:59.000Z

300

Mixed waste focus area technical baseline report. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) established the Mixed Waste Characterization, Treatment, and Disposal Focus Area (MWFA) to develop and facilitate implementation of technologies required to meet the Department`s commitments for treatment of mixed low-level and transuranic wastes. The mission of the MWFA is to provide acceptable technologies, developed in partnership with end-users, stakeholders, tribal governments, and regulators, that enable implementation of mixed waste treatment systems. To accomplish this mission, a technical baseline was established in 1996 that forms the basis for determining which technology development activities will be supported by the MWFA. This technical baseline is revised on an annual basis to reflect changes in the DOE Mixed Waste Management strategies, changes in the MWFA technical baseline development process, and MWFA accomplishments. This report presents the first revision to the technical baseline and the resulting prioritized list of deficiencies that the MWFA will address. This report also reflects a higher level of stakeholder involvement in the prioritization of the deficiencies. This document summarizes the data and the assumptions upon which this work was based, as well as information concerning the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) mixed waste technology development needs.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision Provides guidance to DOE Federal and contractor employees with access to classified information on...

302

Petroleum products demand data revised at regional level ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

A recent revision to petroleum product movements in the Petroleum ... The data revision involves movements of motor gasoline as reported to EIA by one or more survey ...

303

Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University for the appropriate semester. #12;Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado

304

Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines Forrestal Garage...

305

Microsoft Word - FINAL Class 1 Revise TRUPACT-III Management...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dear Mr. Kieling: Enclosed is a Class 1 Permit Modification Notification to: * Revise TRUPACT-III Management Language * Revise Procedure Reference for the Bolting Station in Table...

306

EIS-0218: Revision to the Record of Decision | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision to the Record of Decision EIS-0218: Revision to the Record of Decision Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear...

307

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007,...

308

Safety and Technical Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and Technical Services Safety and Technical Services Minimize The Safety and Technical Services (STS) organization is a component of the Office of Science's (SC's) Oak Ridge Integrated Support Center. The mission of STS is to provide excellent environmental, safety, health, quality, and engineering support to SC laboratories and other U.S. Department of Energy program offices. STS maintains a full range of technically qualified Subject Matter Experts, all of whom are associated with the Technical Qualifications Program. Examples of the services that we provide include: Integrated Safety Management Quality Assurance Planning and Metrics Document Review Tracking and trending analysis and reporting Assessments, Reviews, Surveillances and Inspections Safety Basis Support SharePoint/Dashboard Development for Safety Programs

309

Solar irrigation program plan. Revision  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report describes the ERDA solar irrigation program plan through fiscal year 1979. It is an update of the original program plan as outlined in Sandia Report SAND--76-0594. The updated goals of the plan are listed, the participants named, and their responsibilities outlined. ERDA has the program responsibility, ERDA field offices the contractural responsibility, and Sandia Laboratories the technical direction responsibilities. Three solar irrigation experiments planned, system analyses to be conducted, and the participants of the program are described. This document is intended to be used as a program guide for accomplishing the program goals.

Alvis, R.L.; Vandevender, S.G.

1977-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

Development of Revised Energy Standards for Texas Buildings: Preliminary Results  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In 1977, the State of Texas published a two-part Energy Conservation Manual to aid designers, builders, and contractors in the design of energy-efficient state buildings. Under the sponsorship of the Governor's Energy Management Center, the Center for Energy Studies (CES) at The University of Texas at Austin is revising and updating the nonresidential building portion of the Energy Conservation Manual. The proposed revision is a Texas-specific adaptation of ASHRAE Standard 90.1P ("Energy Efficient Design of New Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings"). These modifications include editorial changes, such as deletion of criteria that do not apply to Texas climates, as well as improved envelope criteria and the addition of HVAC system performance criteria. This paper documents the approach taken in the development of the revised Texas standards. Preliminary results are presented for the new envelope calculation procedures that will be included in the compliance software. This software will parallel that provided for the envelope and lighting sections in the ASHRAE Standard and will ultimately extend the standard to include a performance-based approach for HVAC systems and whole-building Energy Targets.

Hunn, B. D.; Jones, J. W.; Silver, S. C.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Implementation of Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on July 27, 2001 approved Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-II Safety Analysis Report (SAR) and the associated TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods for Payload Control (TRAMPAC). Key initiatives in Revision 19 included matrix depletion, unlimited mixing of shipping categories, a flammability assessment methodology, and an alternative methodology for the determination of flammable gas generation rates. All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites shipping transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) were required to implement Revision 19 methodology into their characterization and waste transportation programs by May 20, 2002. An implementation process was demonstrated by the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in Golden, Colorado. The three-part process used by RFETS included revision of the site-specific TRAMPAC, an evaluation of the contact-handled TRU waste inventory against the regulations in Revision 19, and design and development of software to facilitate future inventory analyses.

D'Amico, E.; O'Leary, J.; Bell, S.; Djordjevic, S.; Givens, C,; Shokes, T.; Thompson, S.; Stahl, S.

2003-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

312

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

E27C177982 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.5 L 4-cylinder Electric Motor: 105 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Payload: 981 lbs Features: Regenerative braking Traction...

313

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

E87C172351 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.5 L 4-cylinder Electric Motor: 105 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Payload: 981 lbs Features: Regenerative braking Traction...

314

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Z07S838122 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.4 L 4 cylinder Electric Motor: 14.5 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Payload: 1,244 lbs Features: Regenerative braking wABS 4...

315

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2AR194699 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.5 L 4-cylinder Electric Motor: 60 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Payload: 850 lbs Features: Regenerative braking Traction...

316

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2WD VIN 1FMYU95H75KC45881 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.3 L 4-cylinder Electric Motor: 70 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Features: Four wheel drive Regenerative...

317

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4AR144757 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.5 L 4-cylinder Electric Motor: 60 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Payload: 850 lbs Features: Regenerative braking Traction...

318

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Z37S813344 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.4 L 4 cylinder Electric Motor: 14.5 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Payload: 1,244 lbs Features: Regenerative braking wABS 4...

319

Vehicle Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4WD VIN 1FMCU96H15KE18237 Vehicle Specifications Engine: 2.4 L 4-cylinder Electric Motor: 70 kW Battery: NiMH Seatbelt Positions: Five Features: Four wheel drive Regenerative...

320

VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SPECIFICATIONS 1 Vehicle VIN:19XFB5F57CE002590 Class: Compact Seatbelt Positions: 5 Type: Sedan CARB 2 : AT-PZEV EPA CityHwyCombined 3 : 273832 MPGe Tires Manufacturer:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Product Specifications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 6   ASTM and ASME specifications for copper tube and pipe...(a) B 359 SB359 B 359M (a) � Seamless tube, for air conditioning and refrigeration

322

General Specifications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Specifications of the Infield Buildings of the Advanced Photon Source L8-78 Martin Knott January 1987 This LS note is the result of a series of meetings, conversations and private...

323

Renewable Energy Interconnection and Storage - Technical Aspects | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Renewable Energy Interconnection and Storage - Technical Aspects Renewable Energy Interconnection and Storage - Technical Aspects Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Spain Installed Wind Capacity Website Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Market Analysis Website: www.gwec.net/index.php?id=131 Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/spain-installed-wind-capacity-website Language: English Policies: Regulations Regulations: Feed-in Tariffs This website presents an overview of total installed wind energy capacity in Spain per year from 2000 to 2010. The page also presents the main market developments from 2010; a policy summary; a discussion of the revision in feed-in tariffs in 2010; and a future market outlook. References Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Renewable_Energy_Interconnection_and_Storage_-_Technical_Aspects&oldid=514543"

324

DOE Technical Standards Program: Recently Approved DOE Technical...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recently Approved DOE Technical Standards Office of Nuclear Safety This page lists DOE technical standards that have been approved and added to the distribution. If they are...

325

Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Information Center DOE Technical Standards Program DOE Technical Standards Procedures Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures Past DOE Technical Standards Program...

326

Approved DOE Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Program August 16, 2013 Technical Standards, DOE-HDBK-1108-2002 Change Notice 2 (July 2013)...

327

Solar energy task force report technical training guidelines  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Guidelines are offered for programs oriented to commercial applications in solar energy, specifically water and space heating. These technologies are examined because they are, in some cases, economicaly feasible. Sample curricula and programs, technical jobs and skills, and equipment are suggested to assist those institutions contemplating the development of technical training. (MHR)

O'Connor, K

1979-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Final Technical Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

New and novel material and process technologies applied in wind blade designs and production are critical to increasing the competitiveness of wind power generation against traditional sources of energy. In this project, through collaboration between PPG Industries and MAG Industrial Automation Systems, the potential of using automated manufacturing for the production of fiber glass composite wind blades was evaluated from both technical and economic points of view. Further, it was demonstrated that by modifying the standard blade raw material forms through the use of cost effective pre-impregnated rovings coupled with using an automated fiber placement machine to lay up the parts, it is possible to produce state of the art composite laminates with significantly improved mechanical performance and with higher processing rates than standard blade production technology allows for today, thereby lowering the cost of energy over turbine blades made using traditional processes and materials. In conformity with the scope of work of the submitted proposal, the project team completed each task and documented and reported its findings on the appropriate quarterly report submitted to the DOE project team. The activities and this report are divided into 5 subtasks: (1) Material Investigation - Reviews traditional materials and key specifications and testing methods; (2) Manufacturing and Automation - Identifies new candidate material forms and automated layup processes; (3) Process Development - Performs trials of candidate materials and processes; (4) Predictive Analysis - Assesses impact of new material forms and automated processes on a model blade design; and (5) Feasibility Assessment - Compares traditional manufacturing processes and materials to new candidate material forms and automated processes.

Juan Camilo Serrano

2011-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

329

Selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance: LA-14310, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document is the fifth in a series of reports that document the binning, statistical sampling, and sample selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance. 1,2,3,39 Revisions to binning assignments documented in this report are primarily a result of new prompt gamma data. This report also documents changes to the random sample specification resulting from these binning changes and identifies and provides the rationale for the engineering judgment sample items for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 and 2009. This revision also updates the changes to the previous surveillance sample resulting from changes to the order that specific containers undergo surveillance. This report will continue to be reviewed regularly and revised as needed to meet the requirements of the surveillance program.

Peppers, Larry; Kelly, Elizabeth; McClard, James; Friday, Gary; Venetz, Theodore; Stakebake, Jerry

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at Hanford. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 835, DOELAP, DOE-RL, ORP, PNSO, and Hanford contractor requirements. The dosimetry system is operated by PNNL’s Hanford External Dosimetry Program (HEDP) which provides dosimetry services to all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee (HPDAC) which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since its inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. The first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture (ERICA) database was designated Revision 0. Revision numbers that are whole numbers reflect major revisions typically involving significant changes to all chapters in the document. Revision numbers that include a decimal fraction reflect minor revisions, usually restricted to selected chapters or selected pages in the document. Maintenance and distribution of controlled hard copies of the manual by PNNL was discontinued beginning with Revision 0.2. Revision Log: Rev. 0 (2/25/2005) Major revision and expansion. Rev. 0.1 (3/12/2007) Updated Chapters 5, 6 and 9 to reflect change in default ring calibration factor used in HEDP dose calculation software. Factor changed from 1.5 to 2.0 beginning January 1, 2007. Pages on which changes were made are as follows: 5.23, 5.69, 5.78, 5.80, 5.82, 6.3, 6.5, 6.29, and 9.2. Rev 0.2 (8/28/2009) Updated Chapters 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9. Chapters 6 and 8 were significantly expanded. References in the Preface and Chapters 1, 2, 4, and 7 were updated to reflect updates to DOE documents. Approved by HPDAC on 6/2/2009. Rev 1.0 (1/1/2010) Major revision. Updated all chapters to reflect the Hanford site wide implementation on January 1, 2010 of new DOE requirements for occupational radiation protection. The new requirements are given in the June 8, 2007 amendment to 10 CFR 835 Occupational Radiation Protection (Federal Register, June 8, 2007. Title 10 Part 835. U.S., Code of Federal Regulations, Vol. 72, No. 110, 31904-31941). Revision 1.0 to the manual replaces ICRP 26 dosimetry concepts and terminology with ICRP 60 dosimetry concepts and terminology and replaces external dose conversion factors from ICRP 51 with those from ICRP 74 for use in measurement of operational quantities with dosimeters. Descriptions of dose algorithms and dosimeter response characteristics, and field performance were updated to reflect changes in the neutron quality factors used in the measurement of operational quantities.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

DOE Technical Standards Program: Archive  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Technical Standards Archives Office of Nuclear Safety Number Title Status TSPP-00 Technical Standards Program Topical Committees (TSPP-00) PDF TSPP-00 TSPP-01...

332

OpenEI - Technical Reference  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

http:en.openei.orgdatasetstaxonomyterm8710 en Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials http:en.openei.orgdatasetsnode927...

333

OpenEI - Technical Database  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

http:en.openei.orgdatasetstaxonomyterm8720 en Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials http:en.openei.orgdatasetsnode927...

334

Ocean Technical | Data.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ocean Data Tools Technical Guide Map Gallery Regional Planning Feedback Ocean You are here Data.gov Communities Ocean Technical Community of Practice Through a variety of...

335

WebMetrics: Technical Overview  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

VUG Home Page NIST Web Metrics Technical Overview. Technical Overview. NIST Logo. Good usability is critical to the success of a website. ...

336

Argonne TDC: Technical Services Agreemens  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Services Agreements with Industrial Partners Argonne researchers provide short-term technical assistance to companies with technical problems requiring expertise that is not...

337

Soladigm DOE Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect

Soladigm's research has produced a fundamental improvement in the technology for dynamic windows by successfully transitioning a low-cost, high-performance dynamic glass fabrication process from a simple 2" research prototype into a full-scale manufacturing environment capable of producing commercial dynamic insulated glass units (IGUs), and developing and optimizing the production process to meet all specifications for mass commercial production. The technology developed under this project is a revolutionary process for fabricating electrochromic glass that today exceeds DOE's 2020 performance and reliability targets at a compelling consumer price point. Before this project, we had demonstrated 2" prototypes using our deposition process that met these performance targets. The goal of this project was to prove that we could transition this lab-scale process to a scalable, "inline" manufacturing process, leveraging existing manufacturing tools capable of achieving a commercially attractive pricepoint in the near-term. Under this project we demonstrated the technical effectiveness of our manufacturing process by achieving or exceeding all of our technical and performance targets for inline fabrication of electrochromic IGUs. These performance specifications exceed DOE's 2020 performance and reliability targets. We also demonstrated the economic feasibility of our manufacturing process by reaching an initial production process that will achieve our target costs, which are compatible with mass adoption.

None

2011-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

338

Requesting a Revision to PUB-3000  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual The following procedure describes the process for making changes to Berkeley Lab's ES&H Manual (PUB-3000). It identifies Responsible Authors who participate in the revision process. A request to revise the ES&H Manual may be initiated by any Berkeley Lab employee; however, all requests must be sent to the Responsible Author and approved by the ES&H Manual Manager, Mike Wisherop. If you wish to request a change to a PUB-3000 chapter, follow these steps: Contact the Responsible Author for the chapter in need of revision. Submit PUB-3000 revisions to the Responsible Author and the ES&H Manual Manager. Direct all questions or comments concerning ES&H Manual content to the ES&H Manual Manager.

339

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

340

Predictive Maintenance Primer: Revision to NP-7205  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The "Predictive Maintenance Primer" revision provides nuclear plant personnel with current information regarding the predictive maintenance technologies and their applications. This guide will assist a plant in improving its predictive maintenance program.

2003-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Water Mass Formation from Revised COADS Data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Surface heat and freshwater fluxes from the Comprehensive 0cean-Atmosphere Data Set are revised and used diagnostically to compute air-sea transformation rates on density, temperature, and salinity classes over the domain of the data. Maximum ...

Kevin G. Speer; H-J. Isemer; A. Biastoch

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

Green Vegetable Oil Processing, Revised First Edition  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This book addresses alternative green technologies at various stages of oilseed and vegetable oil processing. The Revised First Edition includes much of the content of the first edition, but incorporates updated data, details, images, figures, and captions

343

A Revised Version of Lettau's Evapoclimatonomy Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper a revised version of Lettau's evapoclimatonomy model is introduced. Climatonomy is a one-dimensional representation of mean climate, which includes a complete characterization of the surface energy and water balances. The model is ...

Sharon E. Nicholson; Andrew R. Lare; JosiéA. Marengo; Pablo Santos

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

CAO-94-1001 Revision 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Information Management Plan DOEWIPP-12-3429 Revision 0 May 2012 DOEWIPP-12-3429 Rev. 0 2 U. S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field...

345

EPRI Maintenance Excellence Matrix Revision Status  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the progress in revising the Electric Power Research Institute EPRI 2002 Report 1004705, Maintenance Excellence Matrix Assessment Guideline for Fossil Power Plants, which provides utilities a comprehensive self-assessment guideline for improving maintenance processes.

2008-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

346

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST Volume 2: Electricity Demand Robert P. Oglesby Executive Director #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The demand forecast is the combined prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped prepare the industrial forecast

347

New and revised standards for coke production  

SciTech Connect

The need for new and revised standards for coke production in Ukraine and Russia is outlined. Such standards should address improvements in plant operation, working conditions, environmental protection, energy conservation, fire and explosion safety, and economic indices.

G.A. Kotsyuba; M.I. Alpatov; Y.G. Shapoval [Giprokoks, the State Institute for the Design of Coke-Industry Enterprises, Kharkov (Ukraine)

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

348

Building America Standing Technical Committee - Water Heating  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Water Heating Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan, v2012a Revised: January 2012 Committee Chair: 2011, 2012 Marc Hoeschele mhoesch@davisenergy.com 530-753-1100 x23 ARBI Page 2 Background on Residential Water Heating According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's 2005 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS), annual residential water heating totals 2.11 quads of energy annually, or 20% of the energy delivered to residential buildings 1 . Over the past 70 years, gas and electric storage water heaters have been the predominant water heater type in the United States 2 . Recently, gas tankless water heaters have made inroads in market share with current industry projected gas tankless sales estimated at 400,000+ annually, and an

349

External Technical Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

External Technical Review Report External Technical Review Report March 2010 U U . . S S . . D D e e p p a a r r t t m m e e n n t t o o f f E E n n e e r r g g y y O O f f f f i i c c e e o o f f E E n n v v i i r r o o n n m m e e n n t t a a l l M M a a n n a a g g e e m m e e n n t t External Technical Review (ETR) Process Guide September 2008 U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management September 2008 External Technical Review Process Guide Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose of Process ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background .........................................................................................................................

350

Technical Report Technologically Enhanced  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

's National Hard Rock Mining Team and Abandoned Mine Lands Team, who are employees of the following EPA ..............................................................................1-16 Uranium Associations with Other Metal MiningTechnical Report on Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials from Uranium

351

External Technical Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document has been developed to guide individuals and teams who will be involved in External Technical Reviews (ETR) of U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM)...

352

technical committee toolkit  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Jul 12, 2013 ... A resource which includes information guidelines and templates for committee meetings and other ... Committee Bylaws & Policies. ? Technical ... The following documents outline the procedure for proposing and selecting a ...

353

NFRC Technical Support  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

importance of NFRCs rating systems to DOEs energy efficiency goals, LBNL provides technical support to the NFRC in a number of ways as outlined below. As unbiased sources of...

354

Technical Talks Timing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Talks Timing The technical talks should last a maximum of 15 minutes with 5 minutes for set-up and 5 minutes for Q&A. No teamgroup presentations are allowed. The objective of...

355

EMC 2008: Technical Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The technical program begins at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, June 25. All sessions are held on the campus of the University of California, Santa Barbara.

356

EV Technical Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March 2001 AQMD CONTRACT 00192 Project Number: TC-00-0101 Report Number: TC-00-0101-TR03 Electric Vehicle Technical Center Prepared by: Michel Wehrey Juan C. Argueta Julie M....

357

Technical Reference OVERVIEW  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Page 1 Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Technical Reference OVERVIEW The ENERGY STAR...

358

Belief revision in non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Keywords: belief revision, logic programming, logics of knowledge and beliefs, non-monotonic reasoning

José Júlio Alferes; Luís Moniz Pereira; Teodor C. Przymusinski

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Revision of the DELFIC Particle Activity Module  

SciTech Connect

The Defense Land Fallout Interpretive Code (DELFIC) was originally released in 1968 as a tool for modeling fallout patterns and for predicting exposure rates. Despite the continual advancement of knowledge of fission yields, decay behavior of fission products, and biological dosimetry, the decay data and logic of DELFIC have remained mostly unchanged since inception. Additionally, previous code revisions caused a loss of conservation of radioactive nuclides. In this report, a new revision of the decay database and the Particle Activity Module is introduced and explained. The database upgrades discussed are replacement of the fission yields with ENDF/B-VII data as formatted in the Oak Ridge Isotope Generation (ORIGEN) code, revised decay constants, revised exposure rate multipliers, revised decay modes and branching ratios, and revised boiling point data. Included decay logic upgrades represent a correction of a flaw in the treatment of the fission yields, extension of the logic to include more complex decay modes, conservation of nuclides (including stable nuclides) at all times, and conversion of key variables to double precision for nuclide conservation. Finally, recommended future work is discussed with an emphasis on completion of the overall radiation physics upgrade, particularly for dosimetry, induced activity, decay of the actinides, and fractionation.

Hooper, David A [ORNL; Jodoin, Vincent J [ORNL

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Transportation Rule Technical Support  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

EPRI initiated this project as part of an industry effort to seek regulatory relief for two low-level waste (LLW) transportation container rules that the industry perceived as overly conservative. This report presents the technical arguments for regulatory change developed by the EPRI project team. EPRI, through the cooperation of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), is in the process of bringing these two technical arguments forward to the various regulatory agencies.

2002-10-02T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Technical basis and evaluation criteria for an air sampling/monitoring program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Air sampling and monitoring programs at DOE facilities need to be reviewed in light of revised requirements and guidance found in, for example, DOE Order 5480.6 (RadCon Manual). Accordingly, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) air monitoring program is being revised and placed on a sound technical basis. A draft technical basis document has been written to establish placement criteria for instruments and to guide the ``retrospective sampling or real-time monitoring`` decision. Facility evaluations are being used to document air sampling/monitoring needs, and instruments are being evaluated in light of these needs. The steps used to develop this program and the technical basis for instrument placement are described.

Gregory, D.C.; Bryan, W.L.; Falter, K.G.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 July 29, 2004 Fiscal Year 2004, Annual Report to the Office of Management and Budget, Standards use and Participation The Department of Energy (DOE) implements the federal guidance and requirements of OMB Circular A-119 (OMB A-119) and the statutory requirements of Public Law (PL) 104-113 (15 USC 272) regarding the use of voluntary consensus standards (VCSs) through specific Departmental directives (policies, orders, requirements, guides, and technical standards) and supporting programs and management systems. Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, Office of Management and Budget Report for FY-2012 -

363

Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis - May 3, 2004 May 3, 2004 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan: GENII Gap Analysis The GENII software, for radiological dispersion and consequence analysis, is one of the codes designated for the toolbox. To determine the actions needed to bring the GENII code into compliance with the SQA qualification criteria, and develop an estimate of the resources required to perform the upgrade, the Implementation Plan has committed to sponsoring a code-specific gap analysis document. Technical Standards, GENII- Gap Analsis More Documents & Publications Guidance on GENII computer code - July 6, 2004 Technical Standards, ALOHA-Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3

364

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2004 Annual Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Technical Capability Program Federal Technical Capability Program Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy for Fiscal Year 2004 2 Federal Technical Capability Program Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy for Fiscal Year 2004 Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to ensuring that employees are trained and technically capable of performing their duties. In pursuit of this objective, the Secretary of Energy issued DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Policy for Defense Nuclear Facilities, to institutionalize the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). This program specifically applies to those offices and organizations performing functions related to the safe operation of defense nuclear facilities, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

365

HB44 (2010) Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... principles of due process for the protection of the ... committees, subcommittees, NTETC Sectors, task forces, or work ... may be put into force and effect ...

2011-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

366

EV America: Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) Technical Specifications...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

shall be designed and constructed such that there is complete containment of the flywheel energy storage system during all modes of operation. Additionally, flywheels and...

367

Hanford Technical Basis for Multiple Dosimetry Effective Dose Methodology  

SciTech Connect

The current method at Hanford for dealing with the results from multiple dosimeters worn during non-uniform irradiation is to use a compartmentalization method to calculate the effective dose (E). The method, as documented in the current version of Section 6.9.3 in the 'Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual, PNL-MA-842,' is based on the compartmentalization method presented in the 1997 ANSI/HPS N13.41 standard, 'Criteria for Performing Multiple Dosimetry.' With the adoption of the ICRP 60 methodology in the 2007 revision to 10 CFR 835 came changes that have a direct affect on the compartmentalization method described in the 1997 ANSI/HPS N13.41 standard, and, thus, to the method used at Hanford. The ANSI/HPS N13.41 standard committee is in the process of updating the standard, but the changes to the standard have not yet been approved. And, the drafts of the revision of the standard tend to align more with ICRP 60 than with the changes specified in the 2007 revision to 10 CFR 835. Therefore, a revised method for calculating effective dose from non-uniform external irradiation using a compartmental method was developed using the tissue weighting factors and remainder organs specified in 10 CFR 835 (2007).

Hill, Robin L.; Rathbone, Bruce A.

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

Final Technical Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The two main objectives of this project were: 1) to develop and test technologies to harvest, transport, store, and separate corn stover to supply a clean raw material to the bioproducts industry, and 2) engineer fermentation systems to meet performance targets for lactic acid and ethanol manufacturers. Significant progress was made in testing methods to harvest corn stover in a “single pass” harvest mode (collect corn grain and stover at the same time). This is technically feasible on small scale, but additional equipment refinements will be needed to facilitate cost effective harvest on a larger scale. Transportation models were developed, which indicate that at a corn stover yield of 2.8 tons/acre and purchase price of $35/ton stover, it would be unprofitable to transport stover more than about 25 miles; thus suggesting the development of many regional collection centers. Therefore, collection centers should be located within about 30 miles of the farm, to keep transportation costs to an acceptable level. These collection centers could then potentially do some preprocessing (to fractionate or increase bulk density) and/or ship the biomass by rail or barge to the final customers. Wet storage of stover via ensilage was tested, but no clear economic advantages were evident. Wet storage eliminates fire risk, but increases the complexity of component separation and may result in a small loss of carbohydrate content (fermentation potential). A study of possible supplier-producer relationships, concluded that a “quasi-vertical” integration model would be best suited for new bioproducts industries based on stover. In this model, the relationship would involve a multiyear supply contract (processor with purchase guarantees, producer group with supply guarantees). Price will likely be fixed or calculated based on some formula (possibly a cost plus). Initial quality requirements will be specified (but subject to refinement).Producers would invest in harvest/storage/transportation equipment and the processor would build and operate the plant. Pilot fermentation studies demonstrated dramatic improvements in yields and rates with optimization of batch fermentor parameters. Demonstrated yields and rates are approaching those necessary for profitable commercial operation for production of ethanol or lactic acid. The ability of the biocatalyst to adapt to biomass hydrolysate (both biomass sugars and toxins in the hydrolysate) was demonstrated and points towards ultimate successful commercialization of the technology. However, some of this work will need to be repeated and possibly extended to adapt the final selected biocatalyst for the specific commercial hydrolysate composition. The path from corn stover in the farm field to final products, involves a number of steps. Each of these steps has options, problems, and uncertainties; thus creating a very complex multidimensional obstacle to successful commercial development. Through the tasks of this project, the technical and commercial uncertainties of many of these steps have been addressed; thus providing for a clearer understanding of paths forward and commercial viability of a corn stover-based biorefinery.

Aristos Aristidou Natureworks); Robert Kean (NatureWorks); Tom Schechinger (IronHorse Farms, Mat); Stuart Birrell (Iowa State); Jill Euken (Wallace Foundation & Iowa State)

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation. ... Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner Technical Assistance, National Protocol; ...

2013-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

370

c. TECHNICAL DIVISIONS FUNDING POLICY  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

PROMOTING THE GLOBAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROFESSIONS CONCERNED WITH MINERALS,METALS,AND MATERIALS. TECHNICAL ...

371

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

372

Tank safety screening data quality objective. Revision 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Tank Safety Screening Data Quality Objective (DQO) will be used to classify 149 single shell tanks and 28 double shell tanks containing high-level radioactive waste into safety categories for safety issues dealing with the presence of ferrocyanide, organics, flammable gases, and criticality. Decision rules used to classify a tank as ``safe`` or ``not safe`` are presented. Primary and secondary decision variables used for safety status classification are discussed. The number and type of samples required are presented. A tabular identification of each analyte to be measured to support the safety classification, the analytical method to be used, the type of sample, the decision threshold for each analyte that would, if violated, place the tank on the safety issue watch list, and the assumed (desired) analytical uncertainty are provided. This is a living document that should be evaluated for updates on a semiannual basis. Evaluation areas consist of: identification of tanks that have been added or deleted from the specific safety issue watch lists, changes in primary and secondary decision variables, changes in decision rules used for the safety status classification, and changes in analytical requirements. This document directly supports all safety issue specific DQOs and additional characterization DQO efforts associated with pretreatment and retrieval. Additionally, information obtained during implementation can assist in resolving assumptions for revised safety strategies, and in addition, obtaining information which will support the determination of error tolerances, confidence levels, and optimization schemes for later revised safety strategy documentation.

Hunt, J.W.

1995-04-27T23:59:59.000Z

373

DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 1, 2009 July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance on the conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCSs), also referred to as non-Government standards. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the requirements of the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program." DOE-TSPP-10, Conversion of DOE Technical Standards to Non-Government Standards - July 1, 2009 More Documents & Publications

374

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Photo courtesy of Dennis Schroeder, NREL 18022 Photo courtesy of Dennis Schroeder, NREL 18022 The U.S. Department of Energy offers technical assistance supporting energy efficiency and renewable energy. This technical assistance can include direct advice on issues or goals, tools and maps, and training. Some select technical assistance offerings are listed below. For States and Communities The State and Local Solution Center provides states and communities with resources addressing strategic energy planning, policy, financing, data management, and technologies to help them implement successful energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. The Weatherization Assistance Program Technical Assistance Center provides

375

WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study: June 2000--June 2002 (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WindPACT Turbine Rotor WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study June 2000 - June 2002 D.J. Malcolm Global Energy Concepts, LLC Kirkland, Washington A.C. Hansen Windward Engineering Salt Lake City, Utah Subcontract Report NREL/SR-500-32495 Revised April 2006 WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study June 2000 - June 2002 D.J. Malcolm Global Energy Concepts, LLC Kirkland, Washington A.C. Hansen Windward Engineering Salt Lake City, Utah NREL Technical Monitor: A. Laxson Prepared under Subcontract No. YAT-0-30213-01 Subcontract Report NREL/SR-500-32495 Revised April 2006 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle

376

May 22, 2013, FTCP Face to Face Meeting Presentation - Status of FAQS Revision  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FAQS FAQS Revision FTCP Meeting May 22, 2013 Jeanette Yarrington Instrumentation and Control NA-SH-50/David Lawson Ike White FAQ was sent out to FTCP Agents/CTA for post REVCOM review. Transportation and Traffic Mgmt No current sponsor Ike White Has been recent discussion on whether to cancel. Waste Management EM HQ/Christine Gelles Todd Lapointe Reviewed in 04/2010; no update needed but JTA needed. Technical Program Manager Need sponsor? Ike White JTA completed. Needs to be assigned to a sponsor. Aviation Manager and Safety Officer MA-30/Ferrin Moore Pat Worthington JTAs completed but FAQs need to be reviewed. Deactivation and Decommissioning EM-13/George Cava Todd Lapointe Need status update on FAQ revision. Electrical Systems and Oversight

377

Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

23 23 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-46723 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory

378

Report: Technical Uncertainty and Risk Reduction  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY AND RISK REDUCTION TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY AND RISK REDUCTION Background In FY 2007 EMAB was tasked to assess EM's ability to reduce risk and technical uncertainty. Board members explored this topic throughout the year as a component of their focus on the previously discussed topic of Discretionary Budgeting. Discussion Understanding the risks and variability associated with EM's projects is a challenging task that has the potential to significantly impact the program's established baselines. According to budget personnel, EM has established a database of baseline variables and possibilities; however, this tool is project-specific and does not apply to the greater complex. The Board believes that EM could benefit from incorporating an additional and more comprehensive data point into the baseline development process that budgets

379

DOE Technical Standards Program: Topical Committees  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Topical Committee Topical Committee Office of Nuclear Safety Internet Linkage for TSP Topical Committees In the interest of optimum technology transfer, the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) has set up a network of topical committees. These committees provide a forum for communication across the DOE complex on technical standards related activities. If you would like information about a specific topical committee, or wish to join one of the groups, we've provided a roster of TSP Topical Committees and corresponding Topical Committee Chairpersons. Expectations of DOE Topical Committees The March 9, 1998 memorandum (provided here in web page format) from Rick Serbu, Technical Standards Program (TSP) Manager, EH-31, to J. Robert Wayland, Metrology Topical Committee Secretary, Sandia National Laboratories, discusses general TSP expectations of DOE topical standards committees. This memorandum should be reviewed by all DOE/contractor personnel involved in topical committee activities.

380

Hanford Internal Dosimetry Project manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the Hanford Internal Dosimetry Project, as it is administered by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) in support of the US Department of Energy and its Hanford contractors. Project services include administrating the bioassay monitoring program, evaluating and documenting assessment of potential intakes and internal dose, ensuring that analytical laboratories conform to requirements, selecting and applying appropriate models and procedures for evaluating radionuclide deposition and the resulting dose, and technically guiding and supporting Hanford contractors in matters regarding internal dosimetry. Specific chapters deal with the following subjects: practices of the project, including interpretation of applicable DOE Orders, regulations, and guidance into criteria for assessment, documentation, and reporting of doses; assessment of internal dose, including summary explanations of when and how assessments are performed; recording and reporting practices for internal dose; selection of workers for bioassay monitoring and establishment of type and frequency of bioassay measurements; capability and scheduling of bioassay monitoring services; recommended dosimetry response to potential internal exposure incidents; quality control and quality assurance provisions of the program.

Carbaugh, E.H.; Bihl, D.E.; MacLellan, J.A.; Long, M.P.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Derived Concentration Technical Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

196-2011 196-2011 April 2011 DOE STANDARD DERIVED CONCENTRATION TECHNICAL STANDARD U.S. Department of Energy AREA ENVR Washington, D.C. 20585 Not Measurement Sensitive This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/standard/standard.html DOE-STD-1196-2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Derived Concentration Technical Standard was a collaborative effort sponsored by the DOE Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance, with support from Department subject matter experts (SMEs) in the field of radiation protection. This standard, which complements DOE Order (O) 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, was developed taking

382

1997 hybrid electric vehicle specifications  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The US DOE sponsors Advanced Vehicle Technology competitions to help educate the public and advance new vehicle technologies. For several years, DOE has provided financial and technical support for the American Tour de Sol. This event showcases electric and hybrid electric vehicles in a road rally across portions of the northeastern United States. The specifications contained in this technical memorandum apply to vehicles that will be entered in the 1997 American Tour de Sol. However, the specifications were prepared to be general enough for use by other teams and individuals interested in developing hybrid electric vehicles. The purpose of the specifications is to ensure that the vehicles developed do not present a safety hazard to the teams that build and drive them or to the judges, sponsors, or public who attend the competitions. The specifications are by no means the definitive sources of information on constructing hybrid electric vehicles - as electric and hybrid vehicles technologies advance, so will the standards and practices for their construction. In some cases, the new standards and practices will make portions of these specifications obsolete.

Sluder, S.; Larsen, R.; Duoba, M.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

Modular Communication Interface Specification for Demand Response  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains a technical specification for a modular interface for residential appliances that enables them to be compatible with any utility communication system through the use of customer-installable plug-in communication modules. This specification is the result of collaboration between utilities, appliance makers, communication system providers, demand response service providers, and trade organizations. The specification details the mechanical, electrical, and logical characteristics of a s...

2011-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

384

VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS 1 Vehicle Features Base Vehicle: 2011 Chevrolet Volt VIN: 1G1RD6E48BUI00815 Class: Compact Seatbelt Positions: 4 Type 2 : Multi-Mode PHEV (EV, Series, and Power-split) Motor Type: 12-pole permanent magnet AC synchronous Max. Power/Torque: 111 kW/370 Nm Max. Motor Speed: 9500 rpm Cooling: Active - Liquid cooled Generator Type: 16-pole permanent magnet AC synchronous Max. Power/Torque: 55 kW/200 Nm Max. Generator Speed: 6000 rpm Cooling: Active - Liquid cooled Battery Manufacturer: LG Chem Type: Lithium-ion Cathode/Anode Material: LiMn 2 O 4 /Hard Carbon Number of Cells: 288 Cell Config.: 3 parallel, 96 series Nominal Cell Voltage: 3.7 V Nominal System Voltage: 355.2 V Rated Pack Capacity: 45 Ah Rated Pack Energy: 16 kWh Weight of Pack: 435 lb

385

VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 5 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS 1 Vehicle Features Base Vehicle: 2011 Nissan Leaf VIN: JN1AZ0CP5BT000356 Class: Mid-size Seatbelt Positions: 5 Type: EV Motor Type: Three-Phase, Four-Pole Permanent Magnet AC Synchronous Max. Power/Torque: 80 kW/280 Nm Max. Motor Speed: 10,390 rpm Cooling: Active - Liquid cooled Battery Manufacturer: Automotive Energy Supply Corporation Type: Lithium-ion - Laminate type Cathode/Anode Material: LiMn 2 O 4 with LiNiO 2 /Graphite Pack Location: Under center of vehicle Number of Cells: 192 Cell Configuration: 2 parallel, 96 series Nominal Cell Voltage: 3.8 V Nominal System Voltage: 364.8 V Rated Pack Capacity: 66.2 Ah Rated Pack Energy: 24 kWh Max. Cell Charge Voltage 2 : 4.2 V Min. Cell Discharge Voltage 2 : 2.5 V

386

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en DOE-STD-1150-2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1150-2013 DOE-STD-1150-2013

387

DOE Technical Assistance Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Collection of Customer Data for Better Buildings Guidelines For Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utility Keith Freischlag and Curtis Framel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project DOE Technical Assistance Program Team 4 - Program & Project Development & Implementation December 16, 2010 Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities Webinar Overview * Technical Assistance Program (TAP) * Discussion of Identifying Utility Stakeholders * Discussion of Procuring Customer Usage Data * Suggestions to Streamline Data Collection Processes * Overview of Data Reporting Requirements * Q&A Guidelines for Retrieving Customer Usage Data from Utilities * Questions and discussion after presentation

388

Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant technical manual  

SciTech Connect

A key element of the Hanford waste management strategy is the construction of a new facility, the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP), to vitrify existing and future liquid high-level waste produced by defense activities at the Hanford Site. The HWVP mission is to vitrify pretreated waste in borosilicate glass, cast the glass into stainless steel canisters, and store the canisters at the Hanford Site until they are shipped to a federal geological repository. The HWVP Technical Manual (Manual) documents the technical bases of the current HWVP process and provides a physical description of the related equipment and the plant. The immediate purpose of the document is to provide the technical bases for preparation of project baseline documents that will be used to direct the Title 1 and Title 2 design by the A/E, Fluor. The content of the Manual is organized in the following manner. Chapter 1.0 contains the background and context within which the HWVP was designed. Chapter 2.0 describes the site, plant, equipment and supporting services and provides the context for application of the process information in the Manual. Chapter 3.0 provides plant feed and product requirements, which are primary process bases for plant operation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes the technology for each plant process. Chapter 5.0 describes the engineering principles for designing major types of HWVP equipment. Chapter 6.0 describes the general safety aspects of the plant and process to assist in safe and prudent facility operation. Chapter 7.0 includes a description of the waste form qualification program and data. Chapter 8.0 indicates the current status of quality assurance requirements for the Manual. The Appendices provide data that are too extensive to be placed in the main text, such as extensive tables and sets of figures. The Manual is a revision of the 1987 version.

Larson, D.E. [ed.; Watrous, R.A.; Kruger, O.L. [and others

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

1997 DOE technical standards program workshop: Proceedings  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy held its annual Technical Standards Program Workshop on July 8--10, 1997, at the Loews L`Enfant Plaza Hotel in Washington, DC. The workshop focused on aspects of implementation of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 [Public Law (PL) 104-113] and the related revision (still pending) to OMB Circular A119 (OMB A119), Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Standards. It also addressed DOE`s efforts in transitioning to a standards-based operating culture, and, through this transition, to change from a developer of internal technical standards to a customer of external technical standards. The workshop was designed to provide a forum to better understand how the new law is affecting Department activities. Panel topics such as ``Public Law 104-113 and Its Influence on Federal Agency Standards Activities`` and ``Update on Global Standards Issues`` provided insight on both the internal and external effects of the new law. Keynote speaker Richard Meier of Meadowbrook International (and formerly the Deputy Assistant US Trade Representative) addressed the subject of international trade balance statistics. He pointed out that increases in US export figures do not necessarily indicate increases in employment. Rather, increased employment results from product growth. Mr Meier also discussed issues such as the US migration to the sue of the metric system, the impact of budget limitations on Government participation in voluntary standards organizations, international standards ISO 9000 and ISO 14000, and DOE`s role in the worldwide transition from weapons production to cleanup.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

The mixed waste management facility. Project baseline revision 1.2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revision 1.2 to the Project Baseline (PB) for the Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF) is in response to DOE directives and verbal guidance to (1) Collocate the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF) and MWMF into a single complex, integrate certain and overlapping functions as a cost-saving measure; (2) Meet certain fiscal year (FY) new-BA funding objectives ($15.3M in FY95) with lower and roughly balanced funding for out years; (3) Reduce Total Project Cost (TPC) for the MWMF Project; (4) Include costs for all appropriate permitting activities in the project TPC. This baseline revision also incorporates revisions in the technical baseline design for Molten Salt Oxidation (MSO) and Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation (MEO). Changes in the WBS dictionary that are necessary as a result of this rebaseline, as well as minor title changes, at WBS Level 3 or above (DOE control level) are approved as a separate document. For completeness, the WBS dictionary that reflects these changes is contained in Appendix B. The PB, with revisions as described in this document, were also the basis for the FY97 Validation Process, presented to DOE and their reviewers on March 21-22, 1995. Appendix C lists information related to prior revisions to the PB. Several key changes relate to the integration of functions and sharing of facilities between the portion of the DWTF that will house the MWMF and those portions that are used by the Hazardous Waste Management (HWM) Division at LLNL. This collocation has been directed by DOE as a cost-saving measure and has been implemented in a manner that maintains separate operational elements from a safety and permitting viewpoint. Appendix D provides background information on the decision and implications of collocating the two facilities.

Streit, R.D.; Throop, A.L.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Microsoft Word - LBNL-57260-Revision.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7260-Revision 7260-Revision ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Pharmaceutical Industry An ENERGY STAR ® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers Christina Galitsky, Sheng-chieh Chang, Ernst Worrell, and Eric Masanet Environmental Energy Technologies Division Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 2008 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes

392

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES AT THE BUILDING 812 OPERABLE UNIT, LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE 300  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy Livermore Site Office requested a technical review of remedial alternatives proposed for the Building 812 Operable Unit, Site 300 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The team visited the site and reviewed the alternatives proposed for soil remediation in the draft RI/FS and made the following observations and recommendations. Based on the current information available for the site, the team did not identify a single technology that would be cost effective and/or ecologically sound to remediate DU contamination at Building 812 to current remedial goals. Soil washing is not a viable alternative and should not be considered at the site unless final remediation levels can be negotiated to significantly higher levels. This recommendation is based on the results of soil washing treatability studies at Fernald and Ashtabula that suggest that the technology would only be effective to address final remediation levels higher than 50 pCi/g. The technical review team identified four areas of technical uncertainty that should be resolved before the final selection of a preferred remedial strategy is made. Areas of significant technical uncertainty that should be addressed include: (1) Better delineation of the spatial distribution of surface contamination and the vertical distribution of subsurface contamination in the area of the firing table and associated alluvial deposits; (2) Chemical and physical characterization of residual depleted uranium (DU) at the site; (3) Determination of actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates to support risk modeling; and (4) More realistic estimation of cost for remedial alternatives, including soil washing, that were derived primarily from vendor estimates. Instead of conducting the planned soil washing treatability study, the team recommends that the site consider a new phased approach that combines additional characterization approaches and technologies to address the technical uncertainty in the remedial decision making. The site should redo the risk calculations as the future use scenario has changed for the site. As a result, the existing model is based on very conservative assumptions that result in calculation of unreasonably low cleanup goals. Specifically, the review team proposes that LLNL consider: (1) Revising the industrial worker scenario to a reasonable maximum exposure (RME) for a site worker that performs a weekly walk down of the area for two hours for 25 years (or an alternative RME if the exposure scenario changes); (2) Revising the ESSI of 2 mg U per kg soil for the deer mouse to account for less than 0.05 of the total ingested uranium being adsorbed by the gut; (3) Revising bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) for vegetation and invertebrates that are based on 100 mg of soluble uranium per kg of soil, as the uranium concentration in the slope soil does not average 100 mg/kg and it is not all in a soluble form; and (4) Measuring actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates at the site and using the actual values to support risk calculations. The team recommends that the site continue a phased approach during remediation. The activities should focus on elimination of the principal threats to groundwater by excavating (1) source material from the firing table and alluvial deposits, and (2) soil hotspots from the surrounding slopes with concentrations of U-235 and U-238 that pose unacceptable risk. This phased approach allows the remediation path to be driven by the results of each phase. This reduces the possibility of costly 'surprises', such as failure of soil treatment, and reduces the impact of remediation on endangered habitat. Treatment of the excavated material with physical separation equipment may result in a decreased volume of soil for disposal if the DU is concentrated in the fine-grained fraction, which can then be disposed of in an offsite facility at a considerable cost savings. Based on existing data and a decision to implement the recommended phased approach, the cost of characterization, excavation and physical

Eddy-Dilek, C.; Miles, D.; Abitz, R.

2009-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

393

GRISET certification package. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The GRISET (GRIMHX setup) computer code is an input driver for the three dimensional G computer code (Reference 4). GRISET provides a method for automating the creation of G geometry and associated problem specific information such as the reactor maps and the cross section data references. GRISET provides methods which allow the user to model control rod positioning, safety rod insertion with any number failing, control rod withdrawal or insertion, and full or partial melting of control rods. GRISET also calculates the radial shape factor, tilt, roof-top-ratios, and the assembly power peaking.

Taylor, J.J.; Cefus, G.R.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance The Technical Assistance program is managed through the Center for Sustainable Soil and Groundwater Solutions at SRNL. The Technical Assistance program provides teams of nationally recognized experts from across the complex to support both DOE's smaller sites, such as Paducah, Portsmouth, Pinellas, Ashtabula, Fernald, Mound and Kansas City Plant, and larger sites such as Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Savannah River. Solutions that reduce technical risk and uncertainty Focus on science and engineering issues and strategic implementation of remedial systems Independent reviews facilitate regulatory and stakeholder acceptance of solutions. Contacts Karen Skubal karen.skubal@em.doe.gov (301) 903-6524 Justin Marble

395

Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Work |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Work Technical Report Confirms Reliability of Yucca Mountain Technical Work February 17, 2006 - 11:59am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) today released a report confirming the technical soundness of infiltration modeling work performed by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) employees. "The report makes clear that the technical basis developed by the USGS has a strong conceptual foundation and is corroborated by independently-derived scientific conclusions, and provides a solid underpinning for the 2002 site recommendation," said OCRWM's Acting Director Paul Golan. "We are committed to opening Yucca Mountain based only on sound science. The work

396

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures Department of Energy Technical Standards Procedures DOE Technical Standards Program The following procedures should be used to...

397

Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Scientific and Technical Information DOE Scientific and Technical Information DOE * OSTI * Go Mobile Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information FAQ * Widget...

398

Sandia National Laboratories: Employee & Retiree Resources: Technical...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Library Search Sandia Publications Remote Access Technical Library The Sandia National Laboratories Technical Library provides quality information products and services...

399

Clean Cities: Clean Cities Technical Support  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Support to someone by E-mail Share Clean Cities: Clean Cities Technical Support on Facebook Tweet about Clean Cities: Clean Cities Technical Support on Twitter Bookmark...

400

2013 AOCS Technical Services Workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

AOCS Technical Services workshop includes educational sessions designed for lab technicians. 2013 AOCS Technical Services Workshop Meetings, Conferences and Short Courses aocs AOCS Annual Meeting & Expo Call for Papers Conferences Congress control

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

BSCMeasuresInformationRevisionSept2005.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Procurement System Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures Information Document Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Revised: September 2005 2 Table of Contents Purpose ...................................................................................................... 4 CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE Customer Satisfaction: Timeliness ........................................................................................... 5 Quality ................................................................................................ 7 Effective Service/Partnership ........................................................................... 9 INTERNAL BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE Acquisition Excellence .................................................................................. 11

402

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

January 2007 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

403

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

March 2009 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

404

Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality, Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

This report is revision 6 of the Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality. This report is required reading for the training of criticality professionals in many organizations both nationally and internationally. This report describes many different classes of nuclear criticality anomalies that are different than expected.

Clayton, E. D.; Prichard, Andrew W.; Durst, Bonita E.; Erickson, David; Puigh, Raymond J.

2010-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

405

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 2014­2024 REVISED FORECAST Volume 1: Statewide Electricity Demand in this report. #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work listed previously, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped

406

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022 Volume 2: Electricity Demand by Utility ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The staff demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work and expertise of numerous, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped prepare

407

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022 Volume 1: Statewide Electricity Demand in this report. #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The staff demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work listed previously, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped

408

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

April 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are requested to submit revisions if the change is greater than 500 million

409

Microsoft Word - NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 4-final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Characterization Program Revision 4 May 2013 This document supersedes Revision 3 of DOECBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU...

410

U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)...

411

U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)...

412

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 3, Recommended Security Controls ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 3 Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations ...

2012-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

413

Approved Site Treatment Plan, Volumes 1 and 2. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR), has prepared the Site Treatment Plan (STP) for Savannah River Site (SRS) mixed wastes in accordance with RCRA Section 3021(b), and SCDHEC has approved the STP (except for certain offsite wastes) and issued an order enforcing the STP commitments in Volume 1. DOE-SR and SCDHEC agree that this STP fulfills the requirements contained in the FFCAct, RCRA Section 3021, and therefore, pursuant to Section 105(a) of the FFCAct (RCRA Section 3021(b)(5)), DOE`s requirements are to implement the plan for the development of treatment capacities and technologies pursuant to RCRA Section 3021. Emerging and new technologies not yet considered may be identified to manage waste more safely, effectively, and at lower cost than technologies currently identified in the plan. DOE will continue to evaluate and develop technologies that offer potential advantages in public acceptance, privatization, consolidation, risk abatement, performance, and life-cycle cost. Should technologies that offer such advantages be identified, DOE may request a revision/modification of the STP in accordance with the provisions of Consent Order 95-22-HW. The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume 1) identifies project activity schedule milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR). Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume 2) and is provided for information.

Helmich, E.H.; Molen, G.; Noller, D.

1996-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

414

Environmental Monitoring Plan, Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of environmental monitoring is to promote the early identification of, and response to, potential adverse environmental impacts associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operations. Environmental monitoring supports the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 Environmental Management Systems standard, and U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment. Specifically, environmental monitoring enables LLNL to detect, characterize, and respond to releases from LLNL activities; assess impacts; estimate dispersal patterns in the environment; characterize the pathways of exposure to members of the public; characterize the exposures and doses to individuals and to the population; and to evaluate the potential impacts to the biota in the vicinity of LLNL. Environmental monitoring is also a major component of compliance demonstration for permits and other regulatory requirements. The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) addresses the sample collection and analytical work supporting environmental monitoring to ensure the following: (1) A consistent system for collecting, assessing, and documenting environmental data of known and documented quality; (2) A validated and consistent approach for sampling and analysis of samples to ensure laboratory data meets program-specific needs and requirements within the framework of a performance-based approach for analytical laboratory work; and (3) An integrated sampling approach to avoid duplicative data collection. LLNL prepares the EMP because it provides an organizational framework for ensuring that environmental monitoring work, which is integral to the implementation of LLNL's Environmental Management System, is conducted appropriately. Furthermore, the Environmental Monitoring Plan helps LLNL ensure compliance with DOE Order 231.1 Change 2, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting, which require the publication of an annual report that characterizes the site's environmental management performance. To summarize, the general regulatory drivers for this environmental monitoring plan are ISO 14001, DOE Order 458.1, and DOE Order 231.1. The environmental monitoring addressed by this plan includes preoperational characterization and assessment, effluent and surveillance monitoring, and permit and regulatory compliance monitoring. Additional environmental monitoring is conducted at LLNL as part of compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also known as Superfund). LLNL coordinates its ground water surveillance monitoring program with the CERCLA monitoring program to gain sampling efficiencies.

Gallegos, G M; Bertoldo, N A; Blake, R G; Campbell, C G; Grayson, A R; Nelson, J C; Revelli, M A; Rosene, C A; Wegrecki, T; Williams, R A; Wilson, K R; Jones, H E

2012-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

415

Technical Highlights - FEERC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Highlights for November 2013 Technical Highlights for November 2013 The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) cited in Article Published in Inside Science ORNL's recent achievement in ionic liquid (IL) additives for engine lubrication is featured in an article "Molten Salts Could Improve Fuel Economy," published in Inside Science, http://www.insidescience.org/content/molten-salts-could-improve-fuel-economy/1492. The article is syndicated to subscribers at FOXnews.com, NBCnews.com, LiveScience, and others. Dual-Fuel Combustion with Additives Capability A new capability was added to the multi-cylinder advanced combustion research engine at ORNL allowing dual fuel combustion with gasoline and gasoline doped with additives to increase the reactivity. The new configuration allows precise control over fuel temperature to allow for

416

Spring 2009 Technical Workshop  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Spring 2009 Technical Workshop Spring 2009 Technical Workshop in Support of U.S. Department of Energy 2009 Congestion Study Webcast, transcript, and presentations available at: http://www.congestion09.anl.gov/ Crowne Plaza Chicago O'Hare Hotel & Conference Center March 25-26, 2009 Agenda Day 1 - Wednesday, March 25, 2009 9:00 a.m. Registration Check-In & Continental Breakfast 10:00 a.m. DOE Welcome/Purpose of Workshop David Meyer, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE-OE) 10:15 a.m. Session 1 - Historic Congestion in the Western Interconnection The Western Electric Coordinating Council Transmission Expansion Planning and Policy Committee has conducted an analysis of historic congestion in the Western

417

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

418

WHOLE FROG TECHNICAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WHOLE FROG TECHNICAL REPORT WHOLE FROG TECHNICAL REPORT WING NIP, CRAIG LOGAN Imaging and Distributed Computing Group Information and Computing Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 Publication number: LBL-35331 Credits CONTENT INTRODUCTION MRI DATA PHOTOGRAPH DATA (CRYOTOME) SEGMENTATION VISUALIZATION IN 3D PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED Photographing Lighting Misalignment Digitizing Lighting Segmentation Inconsistent Data Higher Resolution Desire IMPROVEMENT INTRODUCTION The goal of the Whole Frog Project is to be able to represent the anatomy of a frog in a computer in 3D space in such a way that a high school student will find it useful in learning physiology, hopefully developing a sense of interest in using computers at the same time. MRI DATA The original plan is to make use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to

419

RMOTC - Library - Technical Papers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Papers & Presentations Technical Papers & Presentations General presentations What is RMOTC? A general overview of RMOTC's capabilities and facilities including the production, drilling, energy assurance, produced water management, carbon management, enhanced oil recovery, and alternative energy programs. RMOTC's renewable partnerships Renewable projects past, present, and future RMOTC: America's premier field testing facility An overview of RMOTC's unique capabilities History Of Teapot Dome A look back at Teapot Dome's rich history Fossil & renewable energy partnership opportunities Exploring renewable energy use in the oil field GPS & GIS - Managing Spatial Data Risk associated with current practice in managing spatial data RMOTC White Papers Oil & gas reservoirs in U.S. like the producing formations at NPR-3

420

Independent technical review, handbook  

SciTech Connect

Purpose Provide an independent engineering review of the major projects being funded by the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. The independent engineering review will address questions of whether the engineering practice is sufficiently developed to a point where a major project can be executed without significant technical problems. The independent review will focus on questions related to: (1) Adequacy of development of the technical base of understanding; (2) Status of development and availability of technology among the various alternatives; (3) Status and availability of the industrial infrastructure to support project design, equipment fabrication, facility construction, and process and program/project operation; (4) Adequacy of the design effort to provide a sound foundation to support execution of project; (5) Ability of the organization to fully integrate the system, and direct, manage, and control the execution of a complex major project.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Final Technical Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The STI product is the Final Technical Report from ReliOn, Inc. for contract award DE-EE0000487: Recovery Act PEM Fuel Cell Systems Providing Emergency Reserve and Backup Power. The program covered the turnkey deployment of 431 ReliOn fuel cell systems at 189 individual sites for AT&T and PG&E with ReliOn functioning as the primary equipment supplier and the project manager. The Final Technical Report provides an executive level summary, a comparison of the actual accomplishments vs. the goals and objectives of the project, as well as a summary of the project activity from the contract award date of August 1, 2009 through the contract expiration date of December 31, 2011. Two photos are included in the body of the report which show hydrogen storage and bulk hydrogen refueling technologies developed as a result of this program.

Maxwell, Mike, J., P.E.

2012-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

422

2011-2012 and 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Package  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

2011-2012 Additions and Revisions + 2013 – 2014 Additions and Revisions package 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Package Methods - Analyses Books Methods - Analyses Books The 2013 – 2014 Additions and Revisions are now av

423

Impingement and Entrainment Survival Studies Technical Support Document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides technical support for designing and implementing impingement and entrainment survival studies that may be conducted as part of a strategy for compliance with the Phase II Rule of §316(b) of the Clean Water Act. This information will benefit permit applicants, environmental staff, and facility managers by facilitating development and conduct of technically defensible studies at their facilities. Such plans are to be developed on a facility-specific basis and submitted to the appr...

2005-05-13T23:59:59.000Z

424

ACTIVITY SPECIFIC FIREARMS SAFETY PLAN FOR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility/ Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility/ North Slope of Alaska/Adjacent Arctic Ocean (ACRF/NSA/AAO) Activity Specific Firearm Safety Plan for ACRF/North Slope of Alaska Sandia National Laboratories Department 6383, Energy, Climate & Atmospheric Management ACRF/NSA/AAO Revision 14 Activity Specific Firearm Safety Plan for June 2010 ACRF/North Slope of Alaska Signature Page This safety plan is approved by the undersigned and includes the firearm and ammunition storage practices described in this document. Mark D Ivey ACRF/NSA/AAO Site Manager _________________________________Date: ______ Mark D Ivey Department 06339 Manager _________________________________Date: _______ Michael L Heister SNL Safety Engineer _________________________________Date:________

425

Federal Technical Capability Program Operational Plan - FY 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

* D D e e c c e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 Revised: February 2012 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability P rogram FY 2012 Operational P lan December 2011 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are:

426

Federal Technical Capability Program Operational Plan - FY 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

i i * D D e e c c e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 Revised: February 2012 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability P rogram FY 2012 Operational P lan December 2011 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are:

427

Environmental Monitoring Plan, Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of environmental monitoring is to promote the early identification of, and response to, potential adverse environmental impacts associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operations. Environmental monitoring supports the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 Environmental Management Systems standard, and U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1A, Environmental Protection Program. Specifically, in conformance with DOE Order 450.1A, Attachment 1, paragraph 1(b)(5), environmental monitoring enables LLNL to detect, characterize, and respond to releases from LLNL activities; assess impacts; estimate dispersal patterns in the environment; characterize the pathways of exposure to members of the public; characterize the exposures and doses to individuals and to the population; and to evaluate the potential impacts to the biota in the vicinity of LLNL. Environmental monitoring also serves to demonstrate compliance with permits and other regulatory requirements. The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) addresses the sample collection and analytical work supporting environmental monitoring to ensure the following: (1) A consistent system for collecting, assessing, and documenting environmental data of known and documented quality. (2) A validated and consistent approach for sampling and analysis of samples to ensure laboratory data meets program-specific needs and requirements within the framework of a performance-based approach for analytical laboratory work. (3) An integrated sampling approach to avoid duplicative data collection. Until its cancellation in January 2003, DOE Order 5400.1 required the preparation of an environmental monitoring plan. Neither DOE Order 450.1A nor the ISO 14001 standard are as prescriptive as DOE Order 5400.1, in that neither expressly requires an EMP. However, LLNL continues to prepare the EMP because it provides an organizational framework for ensuring that this work, which is integral to the implementation of LLNL's Environmental Management System, is conducted appropriately. Furthermore, the Environmental Monitoring Plan helps LLNL ensure compliance with DOE Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, and DOE Order 231.1 Change 2, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting, which require the publication of an annual report that characterizes the site's environmental management performance. To summarize, the general regulatory drivers for this environmental monitoring plan are ISO 14001, DOE Order 450.1A, DOE Order 5400.5, and DOE Order 231.1. The environmental monitoring addressed by this plan includes preoperational characterization and assessment, effluent and surveillance monitoring, and permit and regulatory compliance monitoring. Additional environmental monitoring is conducted at LLNL as part of compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also known as Superfund). LLNL coordinates its ground water surveillance monitoring program with the CERCLA monitoring program to gain sampling efficiencies. (See LLNL [1992] and LLNL [2008] for information about LLNL's CERCLA activities).

Gallegos, G M; Blake, R G; Bertoldo, N A; Campbell, C G; Coty, J; Folks, K; Grayson, A R; Jones, H E; Nelson, J C; Revelli, M A; Wegrecki, T; Williams, R A; Wilson, K

2010-01-27T23:59:59.000Z

428

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance The DOE Office of Indian Energy and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Tribal Energy Program provide federally recognized Indian Tribes, bands, nations, tribal energy resource development organizations, and other organized groups and communities-including Alaska Native villages or regional and village corporations-with technical assistance designed to advance renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. Technical assistance is typically limited to 40 hours and may include, but is not limited to, the following priority areas: Strategic energy planning Grantee support Transmission/interconnection Project development Finance Lease agreements DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Sandia National

429

Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Department of Energy is hosting a Technical Exchange at the Hanford Site on The Department of Energy is hosting a Technical Exchange at the Hanford Site on April 13-14, 2010. The Performance Assessment Community of Practice has been chartered to advise the Office of Environmental Management Tank Waste Corporate Board regarding performance assessments and performance assessment-like analyses, promote consistency in the preparation of performance assessments across the Department of Energy (DOE) complex, foster exchange of information among performance assessment practitioners, and develop appropriate guidance for performance assessments such that they are based on sound science and are defensible. The purpose of this technical exchange is to provide a venue for performance assessment and risk assessment practitioners, managers and regulators, and contributors to the Cementitious Barriers Partnership and Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management project to share plans and experiences and share ideas for future performance assessment and risk assessment modeling. The technical exchange will include a combination of plenary presentations and discussions with breakout sessions for specific topics. Discussions will emphasize areas for improved consistency and solicit suggestions for future developments related to modeling tools. A breakout discussion session is also planned to address: DOE Order 435.1 Update, regulatory challenges for performance and risk assessment modeling, and other topical areas. Arrangements have also been made for a GoldSim modeling roundtable at the conclusion of the workshop for participants who are interested in sharing experiences related to the use of GoldSim for their simulations.

430

Technical changes that would contribute to success in the civilian radioactive waste management program; Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This paper briefly reviews the history of the United States program for high-level waste disposal. It then describes the current DOE strategy for licensing and safety for a repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Changes that have occurred since the origin of the program and since publication of the Site Characterization Plan are reviewed. These include changes in external circumstances, changes in technology and new understanding of Yucca Mountain. An alternative approach is then described, based on four key concepts: a simple safety case, reversibility, demonstrability, and decompling operation of a repository from the operation of reactors.

Ramspott, L.D.

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

The Usefulness of Bi-Level Switching; Original Technical Note: November 1998. Revised August, 1999  

SciTech Connect

California's Title 24 Energy Efficiency Building Standard requires multiple lighting level control in all individual offices. Usually, this requirement is fulfilled using bi-level switching. With bi-level switching, each office occupant is provided with two wall switches near the doorway to control their lights. In a typical installation, one switch would control 1/3 of the fluorescent lamps in the ceiling lighting system, while the other switch would control the remaining 2/3 of the lamps. This allows four possible light levels: OFF, 1/3, 2/3 and FULL lighting. Because it has been required by building code since 1983, bi-level switching is common in California office buildings. However, there is no published evidence showing that occupants sometimes use just one switch rather than just switching on both switches when entering the room. Consequently, some have questioned whether bi-level switching is a necessary or desirable requirement for typical office buildings. In fact, the draft national standard, ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1989K apparently does not require bi-level switching at all.

Building Technologies Department

1998-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Technical Bulletin Number 3 Revised January 4, 2011 Formed in 1982 with federal,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Board in- cludes 6 representatives from producing state shellfish con- trol agencies, 3 representa sanitation agency. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ensures the compli- ance of state shellfish sanitation agencies with the Guide for Control of Mollus- can Shellfish. State shellfish sanitation agencies

Florida, University of

433

Extended characterization of M-Area settling basin and vicinity. Technical data summary. Revision  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Savannah River Plant M-Area settling basin, an unlined surface impoundment, has received process effluents from the M-Area fuel and target fabrication facilities since 1958. The waste effluents have contained metal degreasing agents (chlorinated hydrocarbons), acids, caustics, and heavy metals. Data analyses are provided.

Pickett, J B

1985-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Technical Approach for the Development of DOE Building America Builders Challenge Technology Information Packages (Revised)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy has issued a challenge to the homebuilding industry to build 220,000 high-performance homes by 2012. To qualify, homes must meet the requirements of a performance path, prescriptive path, or participating in a partner program.

Roberts, D. R.; Anderson, R.

2009-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Federal Technical Capability Program - Quarterly Performance Indicator  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 16, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability June 5, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 20, 2013 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 20, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 8, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 30, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability March 6, 2012 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 10, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 24, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 18, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 23, 2011

436

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Basis for U. S. Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy, DOE Policy 420.1 This document provides the technical basis for the Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 420.1, Nuclear Safety Policy, dated 2-8-2011. It includes an analysis of the revised Policy to determine whether it provides the necessary and sufficient high-level expectations that will lead DOE to establish and implement appropriate requirements to assure protection of the public, workers, and the environment from the hazards of DOE's operation of nuclear facilities. In developing the revised Policy and performing this analysis, DOE reviewed the current Nuclear Safety Policy (Secretary of Energy Notice [SEN] 35-91, Nuclear Safety Policy) and safety policies established by other safety

437

Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-MA-842 documents the design and implementation of the external dosimetry system used at Hanford. The manual describes the dosimeter design, processing protocols, dose calculation methodology, radiation fields encountered, dosimeter response characteristics, limitations of dosimeter design under field conditions, and makes recommendations for effective use of the dosimeters in the field. The manual describes the technical basis for the dosimetry system in a manner intended to help ensure defensibility of the dose of record at Hanford and to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 835, DOELAP, DOE-RL, ORP, PNSO, and Hanford contractor requirements. The dosimetry system is operated by PNNL’s Hanford External Dosimetry Program which provides dosimetry services to all Hanford contractors. The primary users of this manual are DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford using the dosimetry services of PNNL. Development and maintenance of this manual is funded directly by DOE and DOE contractors. Its contents have been reviewed and approved by DOE and DOE contractors at Hanford through the Hanford Personnel Dosimetry Advisory Committee which is chartered and chaired by DOE-RL and serves as means of coordinating dosimetry practices across contractors at Hanford. This manual was established in 1996. Since inception, it has been revised many times and maintained by PNNL as a controlled document with controlled distribution. Rev. 0 marks the first revision to be released through PNNL’s Electronic Records & Information Capture Architecture (ERICA) database.

Rathbone, Bruce A.

2005-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

438

Research Projects Addressing Technical Challenges to Environmentally...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Research Projects Addressing Technical Challenges to Environmentally Acceptable Shale Gas Development Selected by DOE Research Projects Addressing Technical Challenges to...

439

Model Based Enterprise / Technical Data Package Summit ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Technical Note 1753 Model Based Enterprise / Technical Data Package Summit Report Joshua Lubell Kenway ...

2012-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

440

USDOE, Office of Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

2008 Special Libraries Association Annual Conference Founding Alliance Members * Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI) - Canada * VTT Technical...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Orlando Gasification Project Generic Design Specification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) technology is now entering commercial service, so there is a need to develop specifications that encourage greater standardization in IGCC design. This Generic Design Specification (GDS), sponsored by EPRI's CoalFleet for Tomorrow program with support from 50 power companies, provides technical information from Front End Engineering Design (FEED) results submitted by Southern Company Services to DOE regarding their Orlando Gasification Project (OGP), a 270 MW...

2008-05-12T23:59:59.000Z

442

Hydrogen Energy California Preliminary Design Specification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) technology enters commercial service, the industry needs specifications that encourage greater standardization in IGCC design. Standardization lowers initial capital cost; supports repeatable, reliable performance; and reduces the time and cost to develop decision-quality economics for potential IGCC plant owners. This preliminary design specification (PDS) defines technical information provided in the permit application submitted by Hydrogen Energy Intern...

2010-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

443

Technical Basis to Risk Inform 10 CFR Part 61: 2012 Project Update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As a result of the research begun in 2007 to better understand the bases of the Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation and 10 CFR 61, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) identified three regulatory initiatives that could be pursued to enhance disposal options for the industry. These initiatives directly follow the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) strategic assessment. The first was to revise the BTP to allow broader blending of compatible waste ...

2012-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

444

Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6450-01-P 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431 Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN 1904-AC23 Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for Information (RFI); request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the "Department") intends to expand and revise its existing energy efficiency enforcement regulations for certain consumer products and commercial and industrial equipment covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended (EPCA or the "Act"). These regulations provide for manufacturer submission of compliance statements and

445

Last Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Instructions for Requesting Dry Ice at the APS Dry Ice requests are handled by APS Detector Pool staff. Dry ice should be requested through the Detector Pool database, similar to how detectors are requested. Dry ice is only available during normal business hours. Since dry ice must be obtained from a building other than the APS, requests must be made in advance to ensure availability of a government vehicle for transporting dry ice. Access the Detector Pool database via the link below. Requestors will be taken to a log-in page similar to the log-in page for the ESAF system. https://beam.aps.anl.gov/pls/apsweb/wam0002.dds_main_menu The page can also be found on the Optics and Detector Group homepage (the "Submit a Detector

446

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS) This WWW page is designed so that encoders can get current Listings of encoded particles with the 'NODES' on the right-hand side of the page. Disclaimer These sections are private PDG files. Please do not quote or refer to them. The authors reserve the right to radically alter these non-completed sections from minute to minute. They are certainly not error free. Conservation Laws The List by Particle Code (includes hidden particle codes) The List in Book Order by Name Light Unflavored Mesons Summary Table Other Light Unflavored Mesons Strange Mesons Summary Table Charmed Mesons Summary Table Charmed, Strange Mesons Summary Table (c cbar) Mesons Summary Table (b bbar) Mesons Summary Table Non (q qbar) Candidates

447

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

September 23, 2013 September 23, 2013 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is announcing changes Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are

448

Coal within a revised energy perspective  

SciTech Connect

The author considers the use of coal within a revised energy perspective, focusing on the factors that will drive which fuels are used to generate electricity going forward. He looks at the world markets for fossil fuels and the difficulties of predicting oil and natural gas supply and prices, as demonstrated by the variability in projections from one year to another in the EIA's Annual Energy Outlook. 4 refs., 1 tab.

Darmstadter, J. [Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, DC (United States)

2006-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

449

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM C C A A L L E E N N D D A A R R Y Y E E A A R R S S 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 - - 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 B B I I E E N N N N I I A A L L R R E E P P O O R R T T UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY November 2013 INTENTIONALLY BLANK FTCP 2011-2012 Biennial Report ~ 2 ~ Table of Contents Section Title Page 1.0 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................... 3 2.0 2011/2012 Accomplishments.......................................................................... 3

450

Nondestructive Evaluation: Electromagnetic NDE Guide for Balance of Plant Heat Exchangers, Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report is Revision 3 to the original report. It presents summaries of nondestructive evaluation (NDE) procedures used for assessing the integrity of BOP heat exchanger tubing. This report is a living document that will be modified and updated with new information as it becomes available. Care has been taken to reorganize the report in a user-friendly layout that can accommodate future growth. As new material, this report contains information about mockups and specific materials. User comments are en...

2009-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

451

1993 DOE technical standards managers workshop: Proceedings  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This workshop is focused on the benefits of the DOE technical standards program, which is focused toward the preferred use of non-Government standards for DOE activities and the development of DOE technical standards when non-Government standards are not available or are inappropriate. One goal of the program is to replace redundant site-specific standards with more universally accepted documents that have been scrutinized by experts. This replacement is discussed at the workshop along with the problems encountered and solutions found. The workshop provided an opportunity for geographically dispersed people to meet and advance their standards knowledge and efforts to support the program. Safety issues have been the driving force behind the program to date. Several companies offer products and services that support the development, processing, and retrieval of standards. This document mostly comprise vugraphs.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

452

Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Site Map Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance to someone by E-mail Share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Facebook Tweet about Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Twitter Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Google Bookmark Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Delicious Rank Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on Digg Find More places to share Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: Technical Assistance on AddThis.com... Quick Links Solution Center Weatherization Assistance Program Technical Assistance Center

453

Mechanical Engineering Department. Technical review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review is published to (1) inform the readers of various technical activities within the Department, (2) promote exchange of ideas, and (3) give credit to the personnel who are achieving the results. The report is formatted into two parts: technical achievements and publication abstracts. The first is divided into eight sections, one for each Division in the Department providing the reader with the names of the personnel and the Division accomplishing the work.

Simecka, W.B.; Condouris, R.A.; Talaber, C. (eds.)

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

FFCAct Clearinghouse, Directory of abstracts. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCAct) Clearinghouse is a card catalog of information about the FFCAct and its requirements for developing Site Treatment Plans (STP). The information available in the clearinghouse includes abstracts describing computer applications, technical reports, and a list of technical experts. Information can be accessed for use in responding to FFCAct requirements, and the clearinghouse provides search capabilities on particular topics and issues related to STP development. Appendix A includes: contacts from each site, for which contact has been made, who are developing STPs; the FFCAct Clearinghouse Fact Sheet and; additional hard copy forms to be used to populate the database. This report contains 50 abstracts related to the Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program.

Harwood, T.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assistance Assistance Technical Assistance Best practice-based technical assistance is provided through a combination of OE staff, and nationally-recognized experts at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Regulatory Assistance Project, the National Council on Electricity Policy, the National Council of State Legislatures, and the National Governors Association, and others. With these entities, the expert technical assistance is provided on an as-requested basis to State public utility commissions, State legislatures, regional State associations, regional transmission organizations/independent system operators, Federal officials, Governors' offices, State energy offices, and sometimes individual electric utilities. Technical Assistance on EPA Rules Implementation to States and the Utility

456

Advanced Distribution Automation Technical Assessments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This 2008 progress report on advanced distribution technical assessments focused on the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) TC-57 body of standards.

2008-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

457

DOE Technical Standards Program: Overview  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Nuclear Safety Vision The culture of the DOE community will be based on standards. Technical standards will formally integrate part of all DOE facility, program and...

458

Additional Technical Information on Cermets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cermets Info Additional Technical Information on Cermets PDF Cermet Waste Packages Using Depleted Uranium Dioxide and Steel (160 KB) Cermet waste package description C. W....

459

Technical Services | Argonne National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

noteworthy for their unique technical capabilities: Central Shops facility performs welding and brazing for high-vacuum applications, machining of radioactive materials, and a...

460

TECHNICAL QUESTIONS What Every Parent ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

open your Windows Control Panel, select Internet Options, and click the Privacy tab. TECHNICAL QUESTIONS What Every Parent Must Do to Keep Children Safe Online 10 10 This...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical specifications revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

2007 Solar Decathlon Technical Publications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2007 Solar Decathlon Citations from Select Technical Publications Changing Behaviors: Market Transformation Web Sites as Online Narrative Hicks, D. Panel 6 - Market Transformation:...

462

APS Technical Update - No. 30  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1995 (updated May 18, 2011) APS TECHNICAL UPDATE - 30 Policy for Radiological Surveys on Tools, Materials & Equipment to be Released from Controlled Areas to Uncontrolled Areas at...

463

Technical Reports | ornl.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) technical report collections at the Research Library include ORNL authored reports as well as those from many other institutions. Most ORNL...

464

APS Technical Update - No. 21  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1997 APS TECHNICAL UPDATE - No. 21 Subject: Shielding Configuration Control Policy and Procedure Attached is a policy and procedure regarding APS Beamline Shielding Configuration...

465

Final Technical Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This project was very successful in terms of providing a unique source of information for rural communities and landowners. We are very pleased with the overall results and believe that this is a vital program for the sustainable development of wind energy. The outreach materials created by Windustry are filling a serious void in information about how local communities and rural landowners can participate in wind development projects. In our program implementation we learned how great the demand is for this type of information both through our hotline calls and website usage. We also realized that the materials require constant updating and maintenance. There is a balance that needs to be found in printing the materials to have handouts ready at meetings for our primary target audience and more research and revisions for the website materials. All of this work is of an ongoing nature. Since this funding was awarded for one year, Windustry will be seeking other funding sources to continue the work in future years. Below is a summary of the Windustry accomplishments as well a sampling of website usage reports. Windustry is appreciative of the US DOE for its support of this wind energy industry work and the Wind Powering America initiative.

Lisa M. Daniels

2002-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

466

Final Technical Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Industrial Assessment Center program at North Carolina State University has conducted one hundred industrial assessments of small and medium sized manufacturers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. Reports were submitted to each facility that included a brief description of the plant, historical energy use, and a technical analysis of potential energy efficiency savings, waste reduction, and productivity savings. Seven hundred thirty eight conservation measures were recommended with total annual cost savings in excess of $18 million. The NCSU IAC has worked with other government and private entities to deliver energy efficiency and conservation services. We have worked closely with the NCSU Industrial Extension Service, the Manufacturer’s Extension Partnership (MEP), and the North Carolina State Energy Office to provide follow-up technical help and financial assistance in implementing conservation recommendations. In addition to these organizations, the NCSU IAC has also worked with the NC Department of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance, the NC Solar Center, Advanced Energy Corporation, Duke Power, Progress Energy, Dominion Power, and the City of Danville, Virginia. Eighteen undergraduate and twenty graduate students were exposed to a variety of manufacturing processes, trained on plant safety, and taught the use of various types of data collection equipment. The students performed technical analyses of each recommendation, computed the potential savings from engineering relations and collected data, estimated the cost from vendor information, and communicated the findings in a compact, well written report to the client. The students have also been exposed to a variety of business personnel, including corporate presidents, engineering managers, plant managers, plant engineers, facility maintenance staff, and production workers – each with a unique perspective on the challenges faced in a modern manufacturing facility. The program has exposed hundreds more students to the importance of energy efficiency / conservation through the incorporation of IAC experiences into the undergraduate curriculum. Both the Director and the Assistant Director teach junior and senior level classes in the thermal sciences curriculum of Mechanical Engineering. These classes have enrollments exceeding 100 students per year, or half of the graduating class. IAC experiences provide real-world examples and topics for discussion to further out student’s engineering education.

Eckerlin, H, M, PhD PE; Leach, J, W, PhD PE; Terry, S, D, PhD PE

2007-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

467

Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report - July 29, 2004 July 29, 2004 Fiscal Year 2004, Annual Report to the Office of Management and Budget, Standards use and Participation The Department of Energy (DOE) implements the federal guidance and requirements of OMB Circular A-119 (OMB A-119) and the statutory requirements of Public Law (PL) 104-113 (15 USC 272) regarding the use of voluntary consensus standards (VCSs) through specific Departmental directives (policies, orders, requirements, guides, and technical standards) and supporting programs and management systems. Technical Standards, 2004 Annual Report More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, Office of Management and Budget Report for FY-2012 - December 19, 2012

468

Statutory Authorities, Office of Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Statutory Authorities Statutory Authorities Established in 1947, DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) fulfills the agency's responsibilities related to the collection, preservation, and dissemination of scientific and technical information emanating from DOE R&D activities. This responsibility has been codified in the organic, or enabling, legislation of DOE and its predecessor agencies and, more recently, was defined as a specific OSTI responsibility in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Energy Policy Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58), Section 982, called out responsibility of OSTI: "The Secretary, through the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, shall maintain with the Department publicly available collections of scientific and technical information resulting

469

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community The objective of this technical arrangement is to establish a framework for co-operation between the Parties in the field of nuclear-related technology research and development based upon mutual benefit. The co-operation is intended to occur in specific areas where the programs of the Parties complement one another as well as those in which comparability exists. 4.5.1.1.3.3_eu_agreement.pdf More Documents & Publications International_Agreements_January_2001_December_2004.pdf International Agreements Comments EM International Strategic Plan 2010-2015

470

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community Technical Exchange and Cooperation Agreement between the Department of Energy and the European Atomic Energy Community The objective of this technical arrangement is to establish a framework for co-operation between the Parties in the field of nuclear-related technology research and development based upon mutual benefit. The co-operation is intended to occur in specific areas where the programs of the Parties complement one another as well as those in which comparability exists. 4.5.1.1.3.3_eu_agreement.pdf More Documents & Publications International_Agreements_January_2001_December_2004.pdf International Agreements Comments Scanned_Agreement.pdf

471

China Refrigerator Information Label: Specification Development and Potential Impact  

SciTech Connect

In the last five years, China's refrigerator market has grown rapidly, and now urban markets are showing signs of saturation, with ownership rates in urban households reaching 92%. Rural markets continue to grow from a much lower base. As a result of this growth, the Chinese government in 2006 decided to revise the refrigerator standards and its associated efficiency grades for the mandatory energy information label. In the Chinese standards process, the efficiency grades for the information label are tied to the minimum standards. Work on the minimum standards revision began in 2006 and continued through the first half of 2007, when the draft standard was completed under the direction of the China National Institute of Standardization (CNIS). Development of the information label grades required consideration of stakeholder input, continuity with the previous grade classification, ease of implementation, and potential impacts on the market. In this process, CLASP, with the support of METI/IEEJ, collaborated with CNIS to develop the efficiency grades, providing technical input to the process, comment and advice on particular technical issues, and evaluation of the results. After three months of effort and three drafts of the final grade specifications, this work was completed. In addition, in order to effectively evaluate the impact of the label on China's market, CLASP further provided assistance to CNIS to collect data on both the efficiency distribution and product volume distribution of refrigerators on the market. The new information label thresholds to be implemented in 2008 maintain the approach first adopted in 2005 of establishing efficiency levels relative to the minimum standard, but increased the related required efficiency levels by 20% over those established in 2003 and implemented in 2005. The focus of improvement was on the standard refrigerator/freezer (class 5), which constitutes the bulk of the Chinese market. Indeed, the new requirements to achieve grade 1 on the label are now virtually as stringent as those for US Energy Star-qualified or EU A-grade refrigerators. When the energy information label went into effect in March 2005, refrigerator manufacturers were required to display their declared level of efficiency on the label and report it to the China Energy Label Center (CELC), a newly established unit of CNIS responsible for label program management. Because of the visible nature of the label, it was found, through a METI/IEEJ-supported study, that MEPS non-compliance dropped from 4% to zero after the label became mandatory, and that the percentage of higher-grade refrigerators increased. This suggests that the label itself does have potential for shifting the market to higher-efficiency models (Lin 2007). One challenge, however, of assessing this potential impact is the lack of a comprehensive baseline of market efficiency and a program to evaluate the market impact on a yearly basis. As a result, the impact evaluation in this study draws upon the market transformation experience of the related EU energy information label, for which quantitative assessments of its market impact exist. By assuming a parallel process unfolding in China, it is possible to look at the potential impact of the label to 2020. The results of the analysis demonstrates that a robust market transformation program in China focused on the energy information label could save substantial amounts of electricity by 2020, totaling 16.4 TWh annually by that year, compared to a case in which the efficiency distribution of refrigerators was frozen at the 2007 level. Remarkably, the impact of a successful market transformation program with the label would essentially flatten the consumption of electricity for refrigerator use throughout most of the next decade, despite the expectations of continued growth in total stock by nearly 190 million units. At the end of this period, total consumption begins to rise again, as the least efficient of the units have been mostly removed from the market. Such a level of savings would reduce CO{sub

Fridley, David; Fridley, David; Zheng, Nina; Zhou, Nan; Aden, Nathaniel; Lin, Jiang; Jianhong, Cheng; Sakamoto, Tomoyuki

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS This document provides guidance and objectives and criteria to support assessments required by DOE O 426.1 Federal Technical Capability (FTC), Section 4. REQUIREMENTS, paragraph b. FTC Program Implementation, subparagraph (7) Self- Assessment. This FTC Order paragraph requires self-assessment of TQP and FTC Program implementation within one's organization. To ensure effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP), Headquarters and field elements conduct self-assessments of these programs. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self-assessments and determines if further action is

473

Technical Reference OVERVIEW  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Page 1 Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Page 1 Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada Technical Reference OVERVIEW The ENERGY STAR score provides a fair assessment of the energy performance of a property relative to its peers, taking into account the climate, weather, and business activities at the property. Parking areas are not eligible to earn the ENERGY STAR score. However, because parking is a common amenity at other commercial building types (i.e., office and hotels), the ENERGY STAR score does make adjustments to accommodate for the presence of parking.

474

EV Technical Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carrier Route Vehicles Carrier Route Vehicles Quarterly Report, June 2001 AQMD CONTRACT #00192 Project Number: TC-00-0101 Report Number: TC-00-0101-TR04 Electric Vehicle Technical Center An ISO 9001 Certified Facility Prepared by: Michel Wehrey Juan C. Argueta Julie M. Phung Southern California Edison June 15, 2001 Page i DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES This report was prepared by the Electric Transportation Division of Southern California Edison, a subsidiary of Edison International. Neither the Electric Transportation Division of Southern California Edison, Southern California Edison, Edison International, nor any person working for or on behalf of any of them makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, (i) with respect to the

475

Technical applications of aerogels  

SciTech Connect

Aerogel materials posses such a wide variety of exceptional properties that a striking number of applications have developed for them. Many of the commercial applications of aerogels such as catalysts, thermal insulation, windows, and particle detectors are still under development and new application as have been publicized since the ISA4 Conference in 1994: e.g.; supercapacitors, insulation for heat storage in automobiles, electrodes for capacitive deionization, etc. More applications are evolving as the scientific and engineering community becomes familiar with the unusual and exceptional physical properties of aerogels, there are also scientific and technical application, as well. This paper discusses a variety of applications under development at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for which several types of aerogels are formed in custom sizes and shapes. Particular discussions will focus on the uses of aerogels for physics experiments which rely on the exceptional, sometimes unique, properties of aerogels.

Hrubesh, L.W.

1997-08-18T23:59:59.000Z

476

LLNL 1981: technical horizons  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Research programs at LLNL for 1981 are described in broad terms. In his annual State of the Laboratory address, Director Roger Batzel projected a $481 million operating budget for fiscal year 1982, up nearly 13% from last year. In projects for the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense, the Laboratory applies its technical facilities and capabilities to nuclear weapons design and development and other areas of defense research that include inertial confinement fusion, nonnuclear ordnances, and particle-beam technology. LLNL is also applying its unique experience and capabilities to a variety of projects that will help the nation meet its energy needs in an environmentally acceptable manner. A sampling of recent achievements by LLNL support organizations indicates their diversity. (GHT)

Not Available

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z