Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Technical Review Panel Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Evaluation and Identification of future R&D on eight Advanced Reactor Concepts, conducted April - September 2012 December 2012 Public release version 2 Public release version 3 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the Technical Review Panel Process ............................................................... 5 2. Technical Review Panel Criteria ......................................................................................... 6 3. Concept Summaries ........................................................................................................... 8

2

Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report This report documents the establishment of a technical review process and the findings of the Advanced Reactor Concepts (ARC) Technical Review Panel (TRP).1 The intent of the process is to identify R&D needs for viable advanced reactor concepts in order to inform DOE-NE R&D investment decisions. A goal of the process is to facilitate greater engagement between DOE and industry. The process involved establishing evaluation criteria, conducting a pilot review, soliciting concept inputs from industry entities, reviewing the concepts by TRP members and compiling the results. The eight concepts received from industry spanned a range of reactor types

3

Advance Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Public Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Energy supports research and development for advanced reactor technologies. This report documents the results of the 2014 Technical Review Panel (TRP) review of seven advanced reactor concepts. The intent of the process was to identify R&D needs for advanced reactor concepts in order to inform Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy R&D investment decisions.

4

Proposal Review Panel Descriptions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Proposal Review Panel Descriptions Proposal Review Panel Descriptions To ensure competent scientific review, a proposal may be assigned to a different panel (at the discretion of the Review Panel Chair), or the panel may seek additional ad hoc reviews from other experts. High-Pressure This panel reviews scattering and diffraction proposals that focus on materials at high pressure. Techniques such as (but not limited to) diffraction, nuclear resonant scattering, and inelastic x-ray scattering for materials at high pressure are appropriate for this panel to consider. Instrumentation This panel reviews proposals related to the development of beamline instrumentation, sample environments, x-ray optical components, and/or detectors that are relevant to synchrotron radiation research. This panel

5

SSRL- Proposal Review Panel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lab Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lab search Go [an error occurred while processing this directive] Proposal Review Panel Sub Panels Structural Molecular Biology & Biophysics Materials 1: Structure, Reactivity & Self-Assembly Materials 2: Electronic Properties, Magnetic Properties & Surface Science Molecular Environmental & Interface Science Membership Torgny Gustafsson Rutgers University Dept of Physics & Astronomy 136 Frelinghuysen Rd Piscataway NJ 08854-0849 Victor Henrich Yale University Dept of Applied Physics 327 Becton Center, 15 Prospect St. New Haven CT 06511 Christopher P. Hill University of Utah Biochemistry 15 N. Medical Dr. East, Rm 4100 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5650 Franz Himpsel University of Wisconsin Dept of Physics 1150 University Avenue

6

BACKGROUND REPORTS FOR THE CALIFORNIA CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE REVIEW PANEL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BACKGROUND REPORTS FOR THE CALIFORNIA CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE REVIEW PANEL Prepared by the Technical Advisory Team in support of The California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel 12 Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel Contents 1. Overview of the Carbon Capture and Storage Panel

7

Federal Technical Capability Panel Contacts list  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 U. S. Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Technical Capability Panel Organization Name Telephone Fax E-Mail FTCP CHAIR Chair (DOE/NTC) Karen L. Boardman (505) 845-6444 (505) 845-6079 kboardman@ntc.doe.gov FTCP Deputy Dave Chaney (505) 845-4300 (505) 845-4879 david.chaney@nnsa.doe.gov FTCP Technical Standards Mgr. Jeanette Yarrington (301) 903-7030 (301) 903-3445 Jeanette.Yarrington@hq.doe.gov FTCP Coordinator Patricia Parrish (505) 845-4057 (505) 284-7057 patricia.parrish@nnsa.doe.gov FTCP Agents DOE Headquarters Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) Richard Lagdon (202) 586-9471 (202) 586-5533 Chip.Lagdon@eh.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety & Security Pat Worthington (301) 903-6929 (301) 903-3445 pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov

8

Proposal Review Panel | Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Proposal Review Panel Proposal Review Panel Submitting a proposal is the first step to access beam time at SSRL. Proposals are peer reviewed and rated by the SSRL Proposal Review Panel (PRP) on a scale from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest). Successful proposals are eligble to request and may be awarded beam time on SSRL beam lines, with priority given to the highest rated proposals and those which demonstrate efficient and productive use of beam time. We have three proposal calls per year with one on-site PRP meeting at SSRL annually. Access Policy The work of the PRP is accomplished with four subpanels: BIO - The biology panel reviews proposals requesting beam time for imaging, X-ray spectroscopic studies, small-angle scattering experiments, and crystallography of biologically important samples.

9

External Technical Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

External Technical Review Report External Technical Review Report March 2010 U U . . S S . . D D e e p p a a r r t t m m e e n n t t o o f f E E n n e e r r g g y y O O f f f f i i c c e e o o f f E E n n v v i i r r o o n n m m e e n n t t a a l l M M a a n n a a g g e e m m e e n n t t External Technical Review (ETR) Process Guide September 2008 U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management September 2008 External Technical Review Process Guide Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose of Process ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background .........................................................................................................................

10

Training in EPSRC peer review procedures, the "Mock Panel"  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Training in EPSRC peer review procedures, the "Mock Panel" Have you ever wondered who is judging your project at peer review panels, and how? Does the whole peer review system seem like a mysterious lottery? You're not alone, and it's for this reason that EPSRC conducts "Mock" Peer Review Panel meetings

Meju, Max

11

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council 851 SW 6th Avenue Compensation Plan Final Proposal Review The Review Process-6 LSRCP Final Review 1 Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Final Proposal Review The Review Process

12

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th............................................ 9 Ocean and Estuary

13

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council 851 SW 6th Avenue Review: Part II Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Preliminary Proposal Review Richard N. Williams Snake River Compensation Plan Preliminary Proposal Review The Review Process

14

Proposal Review Panels (Areas Other Than Crystallography)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Proposal Review Panels Proposal Review Panels High Pressure Instrumentation Imaging/ Microbeam Macromolecular Crystallography Scattering Applied Materials Stanislav Sinogeikin, Chair Tim Graber, Chair Patrick LaRiviere, Chair John Rose, Chair Robert Suter, Chair Ercan Alp Maria Baldini Bin Chen Przemyslaw Dera Lars Ehm Ravi Kumar Barbara Lavina Sang-Heon (Dan) Shim Heather Watson Keith Brister Wenjun Liu Darren Dale Matthew Ginder-Vogel Xiaojing Huang (guest) Tony Lanzirotti Lisa Miller Mark Pfeifer Martina Ralle Xianghui Xiao Hanfei Yan Arnon Lavie Anne Mulichak Armand Beaudoin Dillon Fong Dileep Singh Mike Toney Bob Von Dreele Scattering Condensed Matter Scattering Chem/Biol/Environ Small Angle Scattering (SAXS) Spectroscopy Structural Science Roy Clarke, Chair Lynda Soderholm, Chair Peter Jemian, Chair Mali Balasubramanian, Chair

15

FINAL REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REPORT REPORT WASTE PACKAGE MATERIALS PERFORMANCE PEER REVIEW PANEL FEBRUARY 28, 2002 This document is not an official copy and is for informational purposes only. Signature Page Preface Executive Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Organization of the Peer Review 1.2 Objectives of the Review 1.3 Content of the Final Report 2. MAIN FINDINGS 2.1 Perspective 2.2 Overall Findings 2.3 Corrosion Degradation Modes 2.4 Higher or Lower Temperature Operating Modes 2.5 Long-Term Uniform Corrosion of Passive Metal 2.6 Alloy Specification and Comparison 2.7 Technical Issues to be Resolved 2.8 Organizational-Managerial Issues 3. SUMMARY OF DEGRADATION MODES AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Repository Conditions: Overview of Time, Temperature, Environment

16

Microsoft Word - Quadrennial Energy Review David Eves Panel 2...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Energy Review (QER). Panel 2: Infrastructure Needs through 2030 (11:00 am MT) The natural gas industry and the electric industry use different processes to plan, finance...

17

March 29, 2011, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Face-to-Face Meeting - National Training Center Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Training Training National Training National Training National Training National Training National Training Center Center National Training National Training Center Center Federal Technical Capability Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) Meeting Panel (FTCP) Meeting Federal Technical Capability Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) Meeting Panel (FTCP) Meeting Panel (FTCP) Meeting Panel (FTCP) Meeting Panel (FTCP) Meeting Panel (FTCP) Meeting March 29, 2011 March 29, 2011 March 29, 2011 March 29, 2011 Discussion Topics Discussion Topics p p * NTC Initiatives Update p Lesley Gasperow, Acting Director, NTC * Safety Training Program Update Jeannie Lozoya, Safety Training Program Manager, NTC * Security Training Program Update R Sh Di t S it T i i O ti NTC Russ Showers, Director, Security Training Operations, NTC

18

Findings of the Peer Review Panel on the Draft Reactor Risk Reference Document, NUREG-1150  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report contains the finding of the /open quotes/NUREG-1150 Peer Review Panel/close quotes/ on the methodology and results presented in the Draft Reactor Risk Reference Study (NUREG-1150) and supporting documentation. The report consists of two principal parts: the chairman's report, which summarizes the principal issues of the review, and the individual members' reports, which supply the individual findings and technical details of the fourteen reviewers.

Kastenberg, W.E.; Apostolakis, G.; Bickel, J.H.; Blond, R.M.; Board, S.J.; Epstein, M.; Hofmann, P.; King, F.K.; Ostrach, S.; Reed, J.W.

1988-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review is published to inform readers of various technical activities within the Department, promote exchange of ideas, and give credit to personnel who are achieving the results. The report is presented in two parts: technical achievements and publication abstracts. The first is divided into seven sections, each of which reports on an engineering division and its specific activities related to nuclear tests, nuclear explosives, weapons, energy systems, engineering sciences, magnetic fusion, and materials fabrication.

Carr, R.B.; Denney, R.M. (eds.)

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

EnergyPlus Review Panel: Summary of Conclusions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EnergyPlus Review Panel: Summary of Conclusions EnergyPlus Review Panel: Summary of Conclusions Speaker(s): Charles S. "Chip" Barnaby Robert Sonderegger Date: May 13, 2010 - 2:00pm Location: 90-3075 A five-member panel of "outsiders" has recently examined the software architecture of DOE's EnergyPlus building energy simulation program with respect to robustness, computational efficiency, extensibility, maintainability, and usability. Two members of the panel will informally present conclusions from that study and then open the floor for discussion of the panel's recommendations. Barnaby is Vice-President of Research at software developer Wrightsoft Corporation in Lexington, MA and is Chair of the Review Panel. He has a B.A. in Engineering and Applied Physics from Harvard University and a M.Arch. from the University of California,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Council Document ISRP 2000-6 Independent Scientific Review Panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Council Document ISRP 2000-6 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Review of the Northeast Oregon Hatchery Spring Chinook Master Plan Step One Review of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Three-Step Review Process Charles C. Coutant Daniel Goodman Susan S

22

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

component to the master planning effort. 2005 Step One Review In 2005, the ISRP conducted a Step One review of the hatchery program's Master Plan (ISRP 2005-23 ). Step One is the preliminary review at the feasibility stageIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th

23

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Review of the Final of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Three-Step Review Process Charles C. Coutant Daniel Goodman Susan S Facility (project #9500600) Review Process On January 8, 2001, the Northwest Power Planning Council

24

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in an iterative review of the Estuary RME Plan. The ISRP and the ISAB first reviewed a September 2003 draft of the Estuary RME Plan during their review of the Action Agencies/NOAA Fisheries RME Plan in fall 2003 1 SeeIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th

25

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Preliminary Review-8 October 6, 2000 #12;ISRP 2000-8 Preliminary Gorge and Inter-Mountain Proposal Review Columbia River Gorge Reviewers Jack Griffith Susan S. Hanna Brian Riddell William Smoker Bruce Ward Richard N. Williams Inter

26

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council 851 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 isrp@nwppc.org Review of Draft Clearwater Subbasin Plan ISRP 2003 Merrill #12;ISRP 2002-3 Review of Draft Clearwater Subbasin Plan ISRP Review of Draft Clearwater Subbasin

27

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council 851 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 isrp@nwppc.org Review of Idaho Supplementation Studies (IDFG 2003-8 May 22, 2003 #12;ISRP 2003-8 ISS Review i ISRP Review of Idaho Supplementation Studies Contents

28

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

29

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) Peer Review Panel for predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain. TSPA First Interim Report - June 20, 1997 TSPA Second Interim Report - December 12, 1997 TSPA Third Interim Report - March, 1998 TSPA Final Report - February 11, 1999 Joint NEA-IAEA International Peer Review of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project's Total System Performance Assessment Supporting the Site Recommendation Process - December, 2001 More Documents & Publications Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report TSPA Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Affecting Performance of a Salt Repository for Disposal of Heat-Generating Nuclear

30

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council 851 SW 6 th Avenue Planning Council Members FROM: Rick Williams, ISRP Chair RE: ISRP Review of the Draft Monitoring revision of the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) component of the plan. From the review of the document

31

Council Document ISRP 2000-7 Independent Scientific Review Panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Council Document ISRP 2000-7 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Review of the MASTER PLAN FOR FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF A WHITE STURGEON `PUT AND TAKE Power Planning Council's Three-Step Review Process Charles C. Coutant Daniel Goodman Susan S. Hanna

32

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

..................................................................................................................................... 16 #12;1 ISRP Review of the Chief Joseph Dam Hatchery Program Master Plan Background At the Northwest by the Council (Chapter 3 of the Master Plan provides a reference to the review elements). This projectIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th

33

Council Document ISRP 2000-2 Independent Scientific Review Panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Council Document ISRP 2000-2 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Review of the Tucannon River Captive Broodstock Master Plan Steps One through Three of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Three-Step Review Process Charles C. Coutant Daniel Goodman Susan S

34

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. The habitat- monitoring plan is based in part on the Estuary RME Plan. To place the review of the habitat-monitoring project in the proper context, Bonneville and the Council requested that the ISRP review the draft planIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th

35

Council Document ISRP 2000-1 Independent Scientific Review Panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Council Document ISRP 2000-1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Review of Coeur d'Alene Tribe Trout Production Facility Master Plan Step One of the Northwest Power Planning Council's Three-Step Review Process Charles C. Coutant Daniel Goodman Susan S. Hanna

36

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

conducted a Step Two review of the Yakama Nation's Klickitat River Anadromous Fisheries Master Plan (project Step One review of the Klickitat Master Plan in 2008 (ISRP 2008-6; also see ISRP 2005-7). OverallIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th

37

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, the ISRP reviewed a three-year progress report for the Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board's (UCSRB1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th Subject: Review of Progress Reports for Upper Columbia Programmatic Habitat Restoration Projects (#2010

38

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Subject: Second Follow-up Review of the Yakama Nations' Project, Rock Creek Fish and Habitat Assessment1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th (#2007-156-00) Background At the Council's February 3, 2012 request, the ISRP reviewed a revised proposal

39

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th Chair Subject: Final Review of Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Accord proposal, Idaho Nutrient Idaho Department of Fish and Game's (IDFG) response to a preliminary ISRP review of the Accord proposal

40

Review of the Projects Peer Review Panel and the Project Research and Development Scheme Summary Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Review of the Projects Peer Review Panel and the Project Research and Development Scheme Summary Peer Review Panel (PPRP) process and the Project Research and Development (PRD) scheme to develop to funding can sometimes be too long with some delays occurring after the peer review process; Proposals

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) conduct a review of the Spring Chinook Hatchery Program of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan (LSRCP). The LSRCP was authorized by Congress in 1976 to conduct fish hatchery operations to produce a return of 58,700 adult spring/summer Chinook salmon above Lower Granite Dam after

42

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th To: Doug Marker, Fish and Wildlife Division Director, Northwest Power and Conservation Council From: ISRP Subject: Review of Fiscal Year 2006 Proposal, Acoustic Tracking for Studying Ocean Survival (2003

43

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

From: Eric Loudenslager, ISRP Chair Subject: Review of Accord Proposal, Yakama Nation Status and Trend including but not limited to Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board, the State of Washington, NOAA Fisheries1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th

44

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th conditions. Conditions one and two pertained to the relationship of JCAPE to the Idaho Supplementation Study. These conditions were addressed as part of the ISRP's Idaho Supplementation Study review (ISRP 2003

45

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th the Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Master Plan for the Snake River Sockeye Program (#2007's responses to the Step 1 scientific review elements specified by the Council. Although this is a Step 1

46

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th, 2009 To: W. Bill Booth, Council Chair From: Eric Loudenslager, ISRP Chair Subject: Review of Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Revised Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation projects (1995-057-00 and -01

47

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Preliminary Review to ISRP comments requested Report Page # 24001 Lake Pend Oreille Predation Research Idaho Fish and Game No and conserve high priority bull and westslope cutthroat trout habitat in Trestle Creek. Idaho Department

48

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th' Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation Project 199505702 Background At the Council's April 24, 2007 request, the ISRP reviewed a revised proposal for the Shoshone- Bannock Tribes' Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation

49

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300 Arlington are pleased to transmit a technical report prepared by the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board. Based on its review of data gathered by the DOE and the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses

50

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » Services » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download March 17, 2006 Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External Flowsheet Review Team (Technical) Report Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download previous 1 2 next Miscellaneous Supporting Information January 9, 2007 Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review August 10, 2006 Savannah River Site - Tank 48 Briefing on SRS Tank 48 Independent Technical Review August 10, 2006 Savannah River Site - Tank 48 Transmittal Letter of SRS Tank 48 Review

51

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th To: Tony Grover, Fish and Wildlife Division Director, Northwest Power and Conservation Council From in the side channel after flow in the Wenatchee River recedes. Approximately 400 feet (16%) of the 2,500 foot

52

Petrale Sole Stock Assessment Review (STAR) Panel Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

constituted a major uncertainty in the assessment (Figure 1), as did the appropriate natural mortality ratePetrale Sole Stock Assessment Review (STAR) Panel Report Hotel Deca, Seattle, Washington 20-24 June Leipzig PFMC Groundfish Advisory Subpanel (GAP) Stock Assessment Team (STAT) Melissa Haltuch NMFS

53

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th, 2006 To: Doug Marker, Fish and Wildlife Division Director, Northwest Power and Conservation Council for Studying Ocean Survival and Movements of Columbia River Salmon (2003-114-00)" Background At the request

54

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

approximately $3.5 million in annual funding. The Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board (UCSRB) is the project for selecting and funding projects ­ the same as presently used for Salmon Recovery Funding Board and Mid1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th

55

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th Loudenslager, ISRP Chair Subject: Response Request for Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Accord proposal, Idaho Nutrient Enhancement Project (2008-607-00) Background At the Council's July 9, 2010 request

56

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th specific conditions. Conditions one and two pertained to the relationship of JCAPE to the Idaho recommendation regarding the Idaho Supplementation Study in 2003; consequently, the Council did not request

57

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) will take place in Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review September 2012, Polaris House, Swindon. The Panel will be reviewing 3 project proposals. Members.Aziz@stfc.ac.uk if they are likely to attend the open sessions. The proposals being reviewed are as follows: 19th September & 20th

58

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) will take place at Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Forthcoming Projects Peer Review Panel (PPRP) meeting The next meeting of the Projects Peer Review 2012 The Panel will be reviewing 2 project proposals and 15 PRD applications. Due to the large number of PRD applications being reviewed there will be no open presentations for PRDs. Members of the science

59

Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel December............................................................................1 Creation of the Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel...................................................................................................................................................6 The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in Meeting California's Climate Reduction Goals

60

Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on the Review of the Radiation...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on the Review of the Radiation Effects Research Foundation Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on the Review of the Radiation Effects Research...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel Final Report of theIgneous Consequences Peer Review Panel A report for the DOE on the Yucca Mountain Project. Final Report...

62

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations- Day 2 Smart Grid Panel Discussion  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentations from the Smart Grid panel discussion during Day 2 of the 2012 Smart Grid R&D Peer Review

63

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300 Arlington Dear Speaker Pelosi, Senator Byrd, and Secretary Bodman: The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, and transporting high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. The Board is required to report its findings

64

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

con202vf UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300, the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board) submits its second report of 2003 in accordance with provisions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987, Public Law 100-203. The Act requires the Board

65

United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Experience Gained From Programs to Manage High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel in the United States and Other Countries A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy April 2011 #12;#12;U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Experience Gained From

66

JANUARY 2007 THE BP U.S. REFINERIES INDEPENDENT SAFETY REVIEW PANEL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

OF JANUARY 2007 THE REPORT THE BP U.S. REFINERIES INDEPENDENT SAFETY REVIEW PANEL #12;From left;PANEL STATEMENT The B.P. U.S. Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel i Process safety accidents can be prevented. On March 23, 2005, the BP Texas City refinery experienced a catastrophic process accident

Leveson, Nancy

67

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download September 1, 2011 Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 1, 2011 Compilation of ETR Summaries ETR Summaries from 2011 February 15, 2011 External Technical Review Report for Small Column Ion Exchange Technology at Savannah River Site Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 30, 2009 External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download June 30, 2009 Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of

68

STFC Astronomy Advisory Panel Draft 2012 Programmatic Review report to PPAN (October 2012)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;STFC Astronomy Advisory Panel Draft 2012 Programmatic Review report to PPAN (October 2012) Astronomy Advisory Panel: Richard Bower (Durham University), Michael Brown (University of Manchester), Anthony Challinor (University of Cambridge), Chris Evans (STFC United Kingdom Astronomy Technology Centre

Crowther, Paul

69

2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Smart Grid Panel Smart Grid Panel Discussion 2012 Smart Grid Peer Review Presentations - Day 2 Smart Grid Panel Discussion The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability held its bi-annual peer review of the Smart Grid Research and Development Program on June 7-8, 2012. More than 30 projects were presented at San Diego Gas & Electric's Energy Innovation Center. Presentations from the Day 2 Smart Grid panel discussion are below. Moderator: Lee Kreval, SDG&E 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Rogelio Sullivan, NC State University 2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Matt Wakefield, EPRI More Documents & Publications Smart Grid Characteristics, Values, and Metrics

70

Declassifications requested by the Technical Steering Panel of Hanford documents produced 1944--1960  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this letter report is to list the actions taken on historical documents that the Technical Steering Panel (TSP) and/or the public identified as being of potential use to the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project. The documents addressed herein were generated from 1944 through 1960 at the Hanford Site and were still listed as classified documents in 1990. This report lists the 1429 documents and their classification status. All TSP- and/or public-requested declassifications of Hanford historical documents generated from 1944--1960 have been completed. Of the 1429 documents, 1103 were declassified. (492 as a result of TSP/public requests, 506 previously declassified, 105 declassified for other programs). The remaining 326 documents were not declassified because either they were determined by the TSP to be not applicable to the HEDR Project or because of the reasons given in the appendixes. Of the 1103 declassified documents, 506 have not been reviewed by the TSP for their pertinence to the HEDR Project. Figure I provides an overview of the declassification process.

Gydesen, S.P.

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

by the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville). The Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) and peer reviewIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council 851 SW 6 th to the Northwest Power Act directed the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council) to appoint an 11-member

72

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Board Review of OCRWM's Technical and Scientific Investigations. . . . . . . .9 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33 Idaho National Laboratory

73

The Role of Peer Review Panels in High Speed Rail Studies  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Role of Peer Review Panels in High Speed Rail Studies Frank S. Koppelman Prof. Emeritus of Civil and Environmental Engineering Northwestern University #12;Peer Review · Widely used in all areas of science, technology and engineering. · Long history of peer reviews for ­ Paper review ­ Solicited

Bustamante, Fabián E.

74

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Report to The U.S. Congress And The Secretary of Energy January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2003 #12;U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Report to The U.nwtrb.gov, the NWTRB Web site. #12;#12;#12;NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2003 Dr. Michael L. Corradini

75

Panel Report to FESAC: Review of the 1996 ITER Detailed Design Report  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a U.S. review of the 1996 Detailed Design Report (DDR) of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project. It was prepared by a panel established by the ...

R. W. Conn; D. E. Baldwin; R. J. Briggs; J. D. Callen

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

identified in the ISRP Step 1 review of the Master Plan (ISRP 2012- 13). As described in the Master Plan to address ISRP questions and concerns raised in its initial review of the Master Plan. Nevertheless, someIndependent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council 851 SW 6th

77

2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Report is now available for download. The report provides a summary and compilation of expert, independent technical feedback on GTO-funded projects, as well as feedback from the Peer Review reviewers.

78

March 29, 2011, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Face-to-Face Meeting - Human Factors Engineering  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Factors Engineering Factors Engineering for the Face-to-Face meeting of the DOE Federal Technical Capability Panel March 29, 2011 Caren Wenner and Carol Ingram Introduction "As technologies mature and become more reliable overall, the source of accidents often shifts from being hardware related to interface related The discipline of hardware-related to interface-related. The discipline of ergonomics, or human factors engineering, seeks to address human characteristics, capabilities, and limitations and reflect them in the design of the things we create to make them easier to use, more reliable, and safer." - Steven Casey, Prologue to The Atomic Chef (2006) HFE at FTCP FtF Mar2011 Carol Ingram, NNSA/LSO 2 The harder it is to do something, the less likely someone will do it

79

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-11 Yankee Fork Restoration Plan Review ISRP Step Review of the Yankee Fork Restoration Plan Contents #12;ISRP 2008-11 Yankee Fork Restoration Plan Review ISRP Step Review of the Yankee Fork Restoration Plan Background At the Council's July 2008 request, the ISRP reviewed the Shoshone Bannock Tribes

80

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Williams, PRG #12;ISRP 2008-10 Review of Revised Hood River Production Master Plan ISRP Review ................................................................ 8 #12;ISRP 2008-10 Review of Revised Hood River Production Master Plan ISRP Review of the Revised 1 scientific review elements specified by the Council (Chapter 3 of the Master Plan provides

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.............................................................................................. 1 ISRP Review of the draft Bitterroot Subbasin Plan ................................................................................................ 21 ISRP Review of the draft Blackfoot Subbasin Plan ................................................................................................ 46 #12;1 ISRP Review of the draft Bitterroot and Blackfoot Subbasin Plans Background In 2005

82

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Report to The U.S. Congressand The Secretary of Energy March 1, 2006­December 31, 2007 #12;#12;U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Report to The U in this report. #12;#12;#12;U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board B. John Garrick, Ph.D., P.E., Chairman

83

Methodology for uncertainty estimation in NUREG-1150 (Draft): Conclusions of a review panel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A review has been undertaken by a panel of experts, of the methodology for estimation of uncertainty in severe accident risk resulting from accidents to nuclear power plants as presented in the Draft NUREG-1150 report. This report provides detailed dicussions and conclusions resulting from this review process.

Kouts, H.; Cornell, A.; Farmer, R.; Hanauer, S.; Rasmussen, N.

1987-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

envisioned in an earlier Step One habitat restoration master plan that the ISRP reviewed in September 2008 (ISRP 2008-11). In that review, the ISRP found that the Yankee Fork restoration plan did not meet, but instead warrant a standard ISRP and Council proposal review. The Tribes' submittal including a cover

85

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nation's Response to the ISRP's Step 1 Review of the Klickitat Subbasin Anadromous Fishery Master Plan to the ISRP's Step 1 review of the updated Klickitat Subbasin Anadromous Fishery Master Plan (ISRP 2005-7; February 19, 20051 ). In the initial review, the ISRP found that Master Plan outlined significant changes

86

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Williams, PRG #12;ISRP Review of the Walla Walla Spring Chinook Master Plan Background ................................................................................... 15 #12;ISRP Review of the Walla Walla Spring Chinook Master Plan Background At the Northwest Power's previous 2007- 2009 review (summarized above) still apply. If the current draft of the Master Plan

87

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-019-03). This review considers both the Sekokini Springs Master Plan and MDFWP's response to the ISRP's preliminary review of the Master Plan (see ISRP 2004-5, February 4, 20051 ). The Master Plan is intended to address the Master Plan review, some additionally critical uncertainties are not adequately addressed during

88

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to the ISRP's 2007 review of the revised Master Plan for the Sekokini Springs Isolation Facility, Hungry Horse) response to our 2007 review of the revised Master Plan for the Sekokini Springs Isolation Facility (ISRP Springs step- review and planning effort proceed to final design. The ISRP finds that sponsor's (MFWP

89

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 Review of the Crystal Springs Fish Hatchery Program Master Plan;ISRP Review of the Crystal Springs Fish Hatchery Program Master Plan Contents Background..................................................................................................................................... 17 #12;1 ISRP Review of the Crystal Springs Fish Hatchery Program Master Plan Background

90

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Response Review of the Yakama Nation's Klickitat River Anadromous Fisheries Master Plan Contents Background Step One review of the Klickitat Master Plan in 2008 (ISRP 2008-6; also see ISRP 2005-7). Overall. In September 2012, the ISRP completed a review of the Yakama Nation's revised master plan and supporting

91

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

92

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD The U.S. Congress And The Secretary of Energy Report.nwtrb.gov, the NWTRB Web site. #12;#12;#12;NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Dr. Jared L. Cohon, Chairman Carnegie, California Dr. Debra S. Knopman Progressive Policy Institute Washington, D.C. Dr. Priscilla P. Nelson

93

Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendices Appendices 37 #12;#12;Appendix A Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as chair, on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Commit tee on Nuclear Waste. His areas to the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board on June 26, 2002, by President George W. Bush. Dr. Abkowitz

94

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Report to January 1, 2001, to January 31, 2002 The U All NWTRB reports are available at www.nwtrb.gov, the NWTRB Web site. #12;#12;#12;NUCLEAR WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Appendices Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Members

95

Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendices Appendices 31 #12;#12;Appendix A Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as Chairman on September 10, 2004, by President George W. Bush. Dr­2004), 4 years as chair, on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

96

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Evaluation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Addendum A Addendum A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Evaluation Fiscal Year 2005 The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act nuclear fuel and defense high-level radioactive waste. The Act also estab lished the U.S. Nuclear Waste

97

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Members Appendix A 53  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

51 Appendix A Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Members #12;#12;Appendix A 53 B. John Garrick, Ph.D., P.E. Chairman Dr. B. John Garrick was appointed to the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review, on the U.S. Nuclear Regula- tory Commission's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste. His areas of expertise

98

Distributed Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: Independent Review Panel Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Independent review report on the available information concerning the technologies needed for forecourts producing 150 kg/day of hydrogen from natural gas.

99

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of NMFS Proposal "Evaluate Hatchery Reform Principles" Dear Mr. Cassidy: This letter constitutes the ISRP's review of the revised National Marine Fisheries Service's proposal "Evaluate Hatchery Reform Principles

100

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in response to climate change." This project was first proposed and reviewed in the Research, Monitoring Reservation's Project #2007-252-00, Multiscale Hyporheic Exchange. This project's purpose is to "identify, and Evaluation an Artificial Production Category Review process. The ISRP recommended that the project met

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chair Subject: Final Review of Accord Proposal, Yakama Nation Status and Trend Annual Report (2009-002-00) Background At the Council's July 31 request the ISRP began a review of the Accord proposal, Yakama Nation including but not limited to Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board, the State of Washington, NOAA Fisheries

102

Recommendations to the Technical Steering Panel regarding approach for estimating individual radiation doses resulting from releases of radionuclides to the Columbia River  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the direction of the Technical Steering Panel (TSP) of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project, Battelle staff have reviewed and analyzed available data regarding possible historical radiation doses to individuals resulting from radionuclide releases to the Columbia River. The objective of this review was to recommend to the TSP the spatial and temporal scope and level of effort on Columbia River work to most effectively extend work performed in Phase I of the project (PNL 1991a, PNL 1991b) to meet the project objectives. A number of options were analyzed. Four stretches of the Columbia River and adjacent Pacific coastal waters were defined and investigated for four time periods. Radiation doses arising from ten potentially major exposure pathways were evaluated for each of the time/location combinations, and several alternative methods were defined for estimating the doses from each pathway. Preliminary cost estimates were also developed for implementing dose estimation activities for each of the possible combinations.

Napier, B.A.; Brothers, A.J.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Recommendations to the Technical Steering Panel regarding approach for estimating individual radiation doses resulting from releases of radionuclides to the Columbia River. Volume 1, Recommendations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the direction of the Technical Steering Panel (TSP) of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project, Battelle staff have reviewed and analyzed available data regarding possible historical radiation doses to individuals resulting from radionuclide releases to the Columbia River. The objective of this review was to recommend to the TSP the spatial and temporal scope and level of effort on Columbia River work to most effectively extend work performed in Phase I of the project (PNL 1991a, PNL 1991b) to meet the project objectives. A number of options were analyzed. Four stretches of the Columbia River and adjacent Pacific coastal waters were defined and investigated for four time periods. Radiation doses arising from ten potentially major exposure pathways were evaluated for each of the time/location combinations, and several alternative methods were defined for estimating the doses from each pathway. Preliminary cost estimates were also developed for implementing dose estimation activities for each of the possible combinations.

Napier, B.A.; Brothers, A.J.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan. SSO TQP...

105

The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update...

106

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

qualifications: The first qualification is that upon completion the full-scale project design be reviewed objectives: the long-term monitoring protocol(s) and an index of abundance for adult Pacific lamprey at the end of 2011 or early 2012 on two key uncertainties that have not been completely resolved: can PIT

107

Distributed Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: Independent Review Panel Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:reports@adonis.osti.gov

108

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) characterization of a potential repository site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. In a December 11, 2001, letter to the Secretary and Congress on the DOE's technical and scientific work related to a decision on a Yucca Mountain's Yucca Mountain technical and scientific investigations since the Board's inception; (2) an evaluation

109

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed...

110

School of Physics: guidelines for academic staff who are serving on postgraduate (PhD/MPhil/MRes) annual review Panels  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, and the School to review all aspects of the candidature, develop a plan of action for the next yearD/MPhil/MRes) annual review Panels The annual review meeting is an opportunity for students, their supervisors, and to provide an independent and objective view of progress. A review will normally be completed with 20 minutes

Ashley, Michael C. B.

111

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of independent, expert reviewers to determine the scientific technical feasibility of proposals submitted in response to government agency research needs. His team works closely with the federal government to provide liaison, consultation and operations support during the planning and execution of customers' grant management cycles. The

112

March 29, 2011, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Face-to-Face Meeting - SSO Staffing Analysis: An Alternate Method  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SSO SSO Staffing Analysis SSO Staffing Analysis An Alternate Method Presented to the Federal Technical Capability Panel M h 29 2011 March 29, 2011 1 Requirement Requirement DOE O 426.1 - "Senior managers must DOE O 426.1 Senior managers must conduct annual workforce analyses of their organizations and develop staffing plans that identify critical technical capabilities and positions that ensure safe operations of d f l f iliti " defense nuclear facilities." The FTCP Chair sends out a call for the Workforce Analysis and includes a template Workforce Analysis and includes a template for determining the number of SSO personnel required at each site 2 required at each site. Annual Workforce Analysis Memo Annual Workforce Analysis Memo Site summaries are the basis for the FTCP

113

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the Board will focus include the technical implications of very long-term dry storage of commercial spent, facility operation and design, and waste storage and disposal. con266vf #12;con266vf 2 The Board to have responsibility under existing law for the long-term management and disposition of DOE-owned spent

114

External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for Evaluation of System Level Modeling for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Summary - System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools for Hanford More Documents & Publications Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2009 System Planning for Low-Activity Waste at Hanford Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External

115

SFEI Page 1 RMP Technical Review Committee  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Sedlak noted that the draft Triclosan fact sheet was developed in January 2011, and that additional fact Triclosan fact sheet is in the final stages of review, Mike Connor asked that the Steering Committee

116

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan FY 20082013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

on compliance activities, in conduct- ing its evaluation, the Board will encourage DOE through its science its review of DOE activities into three technical areas: preclosure operations, including surface-facility design and operations and the transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste from

117

THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY A non-technical review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Distribution and Storage 11 Fuel Cells for Mobile and Stationary Uses 14 Carbon Capture and Storage 17-makers, environmental organisations, energy analysts and industry leaders that hydrogen is the fuel of the futureTHE HYDROGEN ECONOMY A non-technical review UNITEDNATIONSENVIRONMENTPROGRAMME #12;Copyright

118

Report of the Peer Review Panel on the early site suitability evaluation of the Potential Repository Site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Yucca mountain Site Characterization Project Office (YMPO) assigned Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), the Technical and Management Support Services (T&MSS) contractor to the YmPo, the task of conducting an Early Site Suitability Evaluation (ESSE) of the Yucca mountain site as a potential site for a high-level radioactive waste repository. First, the assignment called for the development of a method to evaluate a single site against the DOE General Guidelines for Recommendation of Sites for Nuclear Waste Repositories, 10 CFR Part 960. Then, using this method, an evaluation team, the ESSE Core Team, of senior YMP scientists, engineers, and technical experts, evaluated new information obtained about the site since publication of the final Environmental Assessment (DOE, 1986) to determine if new suitability/unsuitability findings could be recommended. Finally, the Core Team identified further information and analyses needed to make final determinations for each of the guidelines. As part of the task, an independent peer review of the ESSE report has been conducted. Expertise was solicited that covered the entire spectrum of siting guidelines in 10 CFR Part 960 in order to provide a complete, in-depth critical review of the data evaluated and cited in the ESSE report, the methods used to evaluate the data, and the conclusions and recommendations offered by the report. Fourteen nationally recognized technical experts (Table 2) served on the Peer Review Panel. The comments from the Panel and the responses prepared by the ESSE Core Team, documented on formal Comment Response Forms, constitute the body of this document.

NONE

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

September 14, 2010, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel, Face to Face meeting … Competency Course Matrix  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 2010 September 2010 Status Update Status Update * 4 Jun 2009 - FTCP Chair Solicits Course Evaluation from all FAQS Sponsors * 20 of 32 FAQS Sponsors Respond - Chemical Processing - Criticality Safety - Environmental Compliance - Deactivation and Decommissioning - Electrical System & Safety Oversight - Emergency Management - General Technical Base Fi P i I d i l H i - Fire Protection - Industrial Hygiene - NNSA Package Cert Eng. - Occupational Safety - Nuclear Expl Safety Study - Nuclear Safety Specialist Radiation Protection Safety Software QA - Radiation Protection - Safety Software QA - Technical Training - Transportation & Traffic Mgmt - Quality Assurance - Instrumentation & Control - Facility Representative - Facility Representative Competency Course Database Competency Course Database Developed

120

Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Analysis Analysis Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analysis While both wet and dry storage have been shown to be safe options for storing used nuclear fuel (UNF), the focus of the program is on dry storage of commercial UNF at reactor or centralized locations. This report focuses on the knowledge gaps concerning extended storage identified in numerous domestic and international investigations and provides the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign"s (UFDC) gap description, any alternate gap descriptions, the rankings by the various organizations, evaluation of the priority assignment, and UFDC-recommended action based on the comparison. Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analysis More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW November 22, 2006 Conducted by: Harry Harmon, Team Lead Civil/Structural Sub Team Facility Safety Sub Team Engineering Sub Team Peter Lowry, Lead James Langsted, Lead George Krauter, Lead Robert Kennedy Chuck Negin Art Etchells Les Youd Jerry Evatt Oliver Block Loring Wyllie Richard Stark Tim Adams Tom Anderson Todd LaPointe Stephen Gosselin Carl Costantino Norman Moreau Patrick Corcoran John Christian Ken Cooper Kari McDaniel _____________________________ Harry D. Harmon ITR Team Leader SPD-SWPF-217 SPD-SWPF-217: Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review 11/22/2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The ITR Team wishes to thank Shari Clifford of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for

122

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Sandia Site Office- 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This self assessment examined how Sandia Site Office (SSO) executes the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan.

123

Communication Between the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix F Appendix F Communication Between the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board on Energy and Air Quality on March 25, 2004 143 #12;#12;Appendix F UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL much for your written questions related to my testimony on behalf of the Nuclear Waste Technical Review

124

March 30, 2010, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Face-to-Face Meeting Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nevada Site Office (NSO) Nevada Site Office (NSO) Great Basin Conference Room March 30, 2010 8:00 am - 5:00 pm 8:00-8:30 am Welcome Karen Boardman, FTCP Chair Steve Mellington, NSO Manager 8:30-9:30 am FTC Order Changes Review Ali Ghovanlou/Dave Chaney 9:30-9:45 am Break 9:45-10:15 am FAQS Status Ali Ghovanlou (Sponsors to Provide a Status Report to Ali) 10:15-10:30 am eTQP Discussion Allen Tate 10:30-11:00 am NTC Activities Arnold Guevara 11:00-11:15 am SSO Workshop Update Earl Hughes / James Heffner 11:15 am-12:30 pm Lunch 12:30-1:00 pm 2010 FTCP Operational Plan Expectations Karen Boardman 1:00-2:30 pm 2010 FTCP Operational Plan (Breakout Sessions) Karen Boardman * Goal 1--Identification of Valued-Added Training Ali Ghovanlou/Robert Stallman

125

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55 May 2011 July 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1

126

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55 May 2011 July 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1

127

Interconnection Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Interconnection Panel Dan Tunnicliff, P.E. Manager, Government Segment, Southern California Edison Southern California Edison Application Processing Technical Scoping Meeting Technical Studies Interconnection Agreement Project Implementation Overview of Generation Interconnection Process (GIP) * Transmission Level Interconnections - Governed by CAISO Tariff. * Generally for 220 kV and higher. * All applications must be submitted to the CAISO. * CAISO administers its tariff, which is approved by FERC. * Distribution Level Interconnections - Governed by SCE's WDAT. * Generally below 220 kV. * All applications must be submitted to SCE. * SCE administers its tariff, which is approved by FERC. 2 Southern California Edison Interconnection agreements are critically

128

DOE FTCP Supplemental Competencies - Human Factors Engineering Functional Area Qualification Competency Examples for DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FTCP FTCP SUPPLEMENTAL COMPETENCIES HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION COMPETENCY EXAMPLES For DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving qualification standards and competencies for Department-wide application. Approval of this set of competency statements by the Federal Technical Capability Panel is indicated by signature below. ?fuv-~ Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson ~·/Cf I Federal Technical Capability Panel * '2._ 3/19/12 I luman Factors Engineering compc1cncics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

129

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE 2008 TECHNICAL REVIEW  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Beginning in 2006, the US Department of Energy (DOE) supported nine applied research projects to improve the protection of the Columbia River and mitigate the impacts of Hanford Site groundwater. These projects were funded through a supplemental Congressional budget allocation, and are now in various stages of completion in accordance with the research plans. The DOE Office of Environmental Management Groundwater and Soil Cleanup Technologies (EM-22) sponsored a technical peer review meeting for these projects in Richland WA, July 28-31, 2008. The overall objective of the peer review is to provide information to support DOE decisions about the status and potential future application of the various technologies. The charge for the peer review panel was to develop recommendations for each of the nine 'technologies'. Team members for the July 2008 review were Brian Looney, Gene LeBoeuf, Dawn Kaback, Karen Skubal, Joe Rossabi, Paul Deutsch, and David Cocke. Previous project reviews were held in May 2007 and March-May of 2006. The team used the following four rating categories for projects: (a) Incorporate the technology/strategy in ongoing and future EM activities; (b) Finish existing scope of applied research and determine potential for EM activities when research program is finished; (c) Discontinue current development activities and do not incorporate technology/strategy into ongoing and future EM activities unless a significant and compelling change in potential viability is documented; and (d) Supplement original funded work to obtain the data needed to support a DOE decision to incorporate the technology into ongoing and future EM activities. The supplemental funding portfolio included two projects that addressed strontium, five projects that addressed chromium, one project that addressed uranium and one project that addressed carbon tetrachloride. The projects ranged from in situ treatment methods for immobilizing contaminants using chemical-based methods such as phosphate addition, to innovative surface treatment technologies such as electrocoagulation. Total funding for the nine projects was $9,900,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2006 and $2,000,000 in FY 2007. At the Richland meeting, the peer reviewers provided a generally neutral assessment of the projects and overall progress, and a generally positive assessment with regard to the principal investigators meeting their stated research objectives and performing the planned laboratory research and limited field work. Only one project, the Electrocoagulation Treatability Test, received a rating of 'discontinue' from the team because the project goals had not been met. Because this particular project has already ended, no action with respect to funding withdrawal is necessary. All other projects were recommended to be finished and/or incorporated into field efforts at Hanford. Specific technical comments and recommendations were provided by the team for each project.

Looney, B; Dawn S. Kaback, D; Eugene L. LeBoeuf, E; Joe Rossabi, J; Karen L. Skubal, K; David L. Cocke, D; Paul C. Deutsch, P

2008-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

130

Independent Oversight Review, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC- July 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project

131

The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NWTRB NWTRB www.nwtrb.gov U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The U S Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update Presented to: National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Presented By: National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Mark Abkowitz May 11, 2011 The Board's Statutory Mandate * The 1987 amendments to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) established the U S Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board established the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. * The Board evaluates the technical and scientific validity of DOE activities related to: - transportation, packaging and storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) - site characterization, design, development, and operations of facilities for

132

Federal Technical Capabilities Panel  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Form" which is available on the NTC website. TQP Qualifying Official (QO) Training Video Conference call was held with Mike Mikolanis regarding TQP QO Training Video. Mike...

133

Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Analyses Analyses Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analyses The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology, has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development activities related to storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The mission of the UFDC is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The Storage and Transportation activities within the UFDC are being developed to address issues regarding the extended storage of UNF and its subsequent

134

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence with the Department of Energy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

85 Appendix E Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence with the Department of Energy #12;#12;Appendix E 87 Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence with the Department of Energy I n of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM). The letters typically provide

135

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Fiscal Year 2002-2007 Strategic Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix G Appendix G U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Fiscal Year 2002-2007 Strategic Plan Statement of the Chairman The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established of Energy Mission The Board's mission, established in the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act (NWPAA

136

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 20042009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Appendix G Appendix G U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2004­2009 (Revised March 2004) Statement of the Board The Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 directed the U-level radioactive waste. The Act also established the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as an indepen dent

137

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1045_Peer Reviews Panel_Lehman Workshop Briefing w-headings  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Science Science Peer Reviews 101 Daniel R. Lehman, Director Office of Project Assessment Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Peer Review 101 Panel Members Mr. Daniel Lehman, Director, Office of Project Assessment Office of Science Mr. Hanley Lee, Deputy Manager, SLAC Site Office (formerly SC Federal Project Director for the LCLS Project) Mr. James Krupnick, Associate Lab. Director/Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (formerly Project Director for the Molecular Foundry Project) Mr. Scott Samuelson, PMP Acting Director, NNSA Office of Major Systems Acquisitions (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) Office of Science Peer Reviews 101 (formerly NNSA Federal Project Director for the NIF Project) 2 Office of Science Peer Reviews 101

138

A review of solar photovoltaic panel cooling systems with special reference to Ground coupled central panel cooling system (GC-CPCS)  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The efficiency of wafer-based crystalline as well as Thin film Solar photovoltaic cells get reduced with increase of panel temperature. It is noted that the efficiency drops by about 0.5% for increase of 1C of panel temperature. It is necessary to operate them at low temperatures in order to keep the PV module electrical efficiency at acceptable level. Therefore need for a low-cost cooling system for the Solar panels is felt. The cooling of Solar PV panels is a problem of great practical significance. It has the potential to reduce the cost of solar energy in three ways. First, cooling can improve the electrical production of standard flat plate PV modules. Second, cooling makes possible the use of concentrating PV systems. Finally, the heat removed by the PV cooling system can be used for domestic or industrial use. Various Solar PV panel cooling systems have been developed in past. A new system for cooling of Solar PV panels called the Ground-Coupled Central Panel Cooling System (GC-CPCS) is installed and operational at the Energy Park of Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya (RGPV), Bhopal, India. This paper discusses various Solar PV panel cooling technologies and the testing and performance of the newly developed Ground-Coupled Central Panel Cooling System (GC-CPCS). This study is unique in three ways. First, it introduces the concept of Central cooling of Solar PV panels. Second, Ground Coupled Heat Exchanger is used for the first time in any Solar PV Panel Cooling System. Third, the testing is done on site under actual solar irradiance.

Amit Sahay; V.K. Sethi; A.C. Tiwari; Mukesh Pandey

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

TWRS vadose zone contamination issue expert panel report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

When members were first canvassed for participation in the Vadose Zone Expert Panel the stated purpose for convening the Panel was to review a controversial draft report, the SX Tank Farm Report. This report was produced by a DOE Grand Junction Project Office (GJPO) contractor, RUST Geotech, now MACTEC-ERS, for the DOE Richland Office (DOERL). Three meetings were planned for June, July and August, 1995 to review the draft report and to complete a Panel report by mid-September. The Expert Panel has found its efforts confounded by various non-technical issues. The Expert Panel has chosen to address some of the non-technical issues in this Preface rather than to dilute the technical discussion that follows in the body of this independent expert panel status report (Panel Report). Rather than performing a straightforward manuscript review, the Panel was asked to resolve conflicting interpretations of gamma-ray logging measurements performed in vadose zone boreholes (drywells) surrounding the high-level radioactive wastes of the SX tank farm. There are numerous and complex technical issues that must be evaluated before the vertical and radial extent of contaminant migration at the SX tank farm can be accurately assessed. When the Panel first met in early June, 1996, it quickly became apparent that the scientific and technical issues were obscured by policy and institutional affairs which have polarized discussion among various segments of the Hanford organization. This situation reflects the kinds of institutional problems described separately in reports by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS/NRC), The Hanford Tanks Environmental Impacts and Policy Choices and BmTiers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program. The Vadose Zone Characterization Program, appears to be caught between conflicting pressures and organizational mandates, some imposed from outside DOE-RL and some self-imposed. The institutional problems they encountered include having both Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS), the parent organization of the Vadose Zone Characterization Program and Environmental Restoration (ER), each under different regulatory controls and different organizational units, seeking to defend the status quo and discount many of the Panel`s conclusions and recommendations. The results presented in the SX Tank Farm Report, especially the visualizations, have created concern in the public sector, both on a local, personal level and on a national political level.

Shafer, D.S.

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Technical Standards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Review for Technical Standards of Interest Legend: Red Technical Standards Program Activities and Responsibilities Blue Directives Program Activities and Responsibilities...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Hydrogen Safety Panel | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Panel Hydrogen Safety Panel 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C....

142

2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Provided in three sections, this comprehensive technical report assesses 100 projects in the GTO portfolio, based on presentations from GTO-funded principal investigators that were evaluated and...

143

Microsoft PowerPoint - NEUP FY2011 R&D Review Processes For Web.pptx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

gy gy y g FY2011 Review Process FY2011 NEUP Review Process FY2011 NEUP Review Process RPA Proposals RPA 3 Pagers: Submission of three page RPA Proposals 3 page P R i RPA 3 Pagers: Submission of three page proposals by university respondents Relevancy Panels: Composed of two Federally selected reviewers representing technical areas Peer Review Panels: Composed of Federally Relevancy Panels Peer Review Panels Peer Review Panels: Composed of Federally selected University or Laboratory technical peers Recommendation Panels: Composed of Federal Directors and their selected advisors SSO Selection: Presentation of Recommendation Panels SSO Selection: Presentation of recommendations by NEUP to the SSO Invited: Proposals selected by the SSO to submit a full proposal N t I it d P l t l t d b th SSO SSO Selection

144

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact 202-586-4940 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment

145

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:15pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment facility that contain tanks and piping. Due to high levels of

146

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact 202-586-4940 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment

147

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Review to Assess Black Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:15pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment facility that contain tanks and piping. Due to high levels of

148

L1:PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review Andrew Godfrey ORNL Completed: June 25, 2013 CASL- -2013-01 -000 Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs Consortium...

149

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council; 851 SW 6th  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Conservation Council From: ISRP and ISAB Subject: Review of the Draft Columbia River Basin Research Plan as a planning and prioritizing tool. The ISAB/RP understood that to be a preliminary review and suggested a follow-up review of a revised plan. The November 2005 version of the plan is much improved from the draft

150

Final recommendations of the Peer Review Panel on the use of seismic methods for characterizing Yucca Mountain and vicinity  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Peer Review Panel was charged with deciding whether seismic methods, which had been utilized at Yucca Mountain with mixed results in the past, could provide useful information about the Tertiary structure in the Yucca Mountain area. The objectives of using seismic methods at Yucca Mountain are to: (a) obtain information about the structural character of the Paleozoic-Tertiary (Pz-T) contact, and (b) obtain information about the structural and volcanic details within the Tertiary and Quaternary section. The Panel recommends that a four part program be undertaken to test the utility of seismic reflection data for characterizing the structural setting of the Yucca Mountain area. The Panel feels strongly that all four parts of the program must be completed in order to provide the highest probability of success. The four parts of the program are: (a) drill or extend a deep hole in Crater Flat to provide depth control and allow for the identification of seismic reflectors in an area where good quality seismic reflection data are expected; (b) undertake a full seismic noise test in Crater Flat, test 2D receiver arrays as well as linear arrays; perform an expanding spread test using both P and S wave sources to obtain a quick look at the reflection quality in the area and see if shear wave reflections might provide structural information in areas of unsaturated rock; (c) acquire a P wave seismic reflection profile across Crater Flat through the deep control well, across Yucca Mountain, and continuing into Jackass Flats; and (d) acquire a standard VSP (vertical seismic profiling) in the deep control well to tie the seismic data into depth and to identify reflectors correctly.

NONE

1991-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

151

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

152

Technical, Economical, and Climate-Related Aspects of Biochar Production Technologies: A Literature Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Technical, Economical, and Climate-Related Aspects of Biochar Production Technologies: A Literature Review ... Bioenergy Unit, Ecofys, 81243 Mnchen, Germany ... For this reason, this paper summarizes the available peer-reviewed scientific literature (ISI Web of Knowledge) about the technological, economical, and climate-relevant aspects of carbonization technologies. ...

Sebastian Meyer; Bruno Glaser; Peter Quicker

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

153

CAS marketing panel formed  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

CAS marketing panel formed ... A nine-member marketing panel has been formed as an adjunct to the Chemical Abstracts Service advisory board. ... In discussing the role of the panel, Philip K. Reily, director of the CAS marketing division, commented: "Marketing techniquesspecifically adapted to modern technical problems, well refined and developed, and skill-fully executedare the only effective way to insure that our chemical information services are going to be fully understood and widely utilized by chemists and chemical engineers all over the world." ...

1967-04-03T23:59:59.000Z

154

Software Sensitivity Review | Scientific and Technical Information Program  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Sensitivity Review Sensitivity Review Print page Print page Email page Email page As required by DOE O 241.1B, software submitting sites are to review all software for classified and controlled unclassified information, including Personally Identifiable Information (PII), according to approved local procedures. Prior to announcing and/or submitting software to ESTSC or a SIAC, or disseminating software publicly, the submitting site should conduct reviews to determine the appropriate Intellectual Property or other category of sensitivity. Those categories include: Unlimited Announcement - Software which be made available to all requesters; government, public and foreign (sensitive countries require Headquarters approval). Open Source Software - Computer software that is distributed under a

155

Technical evaluation of a solar heating system having conventional hydronic solar collectors and a radiant panel slab. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A simple innovative solar heating design (Solar Option One) using conventional hydronic solar collectors and a radiant panel slab was constructed. An objective of hybrid solar design is to combine the relative advantages of active and passive design approaches while minimizing their respective disadvantages. A test house using the Solar Option One heating system was experimentally monitored to determine its energy based performance during the 1982-83 heating season. The test residence is located in Lyndonville, Vermont, an area which has a characteristically cold and cloudy climate. The two story residence has a floor area of about 1400 square feet and is constructed on a 720 square foot 5.5 inch thick floor slab. A 24 inch packed gravel bed is located beneath the slab and the slab-gravel bed is insulated by two inches of polystyrene insulation. The test building is of frame construction and uses insulation levels which have become commonplace throughout the country. The structure would not fall into the superinsulated category but was tightly constructed so as to have a low infiltration level. The building is sun-tempered in that windows were concentrated somewhat on the South side and all but avoided on the North. A solar greenhouse on the South side of the building was closed off from the structure permanently throughout the testing so as to better observe the solar heating invention without confounding variables. The monitoring equipment generated an internal gain of about 17,000 BTUs per day, roughly the equivalent of occupancy by two persons. A full description of the experimental testing program is given. System efficiency and performance are reported.

Starr, R.J.

1984-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

2012 SG Peer Review - Day 2 Panel Discussion: Puesh Kumar, American Public Power Association  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Peer Review June 7-8, 2012 San Diego, CA Puesh M. Kumar Director of Engineering & Operations Public Power and APPA * Public power: operated by local governments; reliable, responsive, not-for-profit * 2,000 community-owned electric utilities, 46 million people * Non-profit, non-partisan organization, est. 1940 - Public policy interests - Member services - Reliable electricity at reasonable prices - Proper protection of the environment Public Power in the US 63 648 384 340 308 133 80 30 22 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Less than 10 11 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,000 2,001 to 4000 4,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 20,000 20,001 to 40,000 40,001 - 100,000 More than 100,000 Customers Ser ved Public Power by Number of Customers Served DEED * Demonstration of Energy Efficient Developments * Created in 1980

157

Independent Technical Review of In-Tank Precipitation (ITP) at the Savannah River Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An Independent Technical Review of In-Tank Precipitation (ITP) and Extended Sludge Processing (ESP) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) was carried out in March, 1993. The review focused on ITP/ESP equipment and chemical processes, integration of ITP/ESP within the High Level Waste (HLW) and Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) systems, and management and regulatory concerns. Following the ITR executive summary, this report includes: Chapter I--summary assessment; Chapter II--recommendations; and Chapter III--technical evaluations.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Industry Partners Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Industry Panel presenters include: Michael G. Andrew, Director - Academic and Technical Programs, Advanced Products and Materials, Johnson Controls Power Solutions Michael A. Fetcenko, Vice President and Managing Director, BASF Battery Materials Ovonic, BASF Corporation Adam Kahn, Founder and CEO, AKHAN Technologies, Inc. Stephen E. Zimmer, Executive Director, United States Council for Automotive Research (USCAR)

159

Technical issues related to NUREG 0800, Chapter 18: Human Factors Engineering/Standard Review Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The revision of Chapter 18 of NUREG 0800, Human Factors Engineering Standard Review Plan (SRP) will be based on SECY 82-111 and guidance contained in NUREG 0700, NUREG 0801 and NUREG 0835, plus other references. In conducting field reviews of control rooms, the NRC has identified technical issues which can be used to enhance the development of the revised version of NUREG 0800, and to establish priorities among the list of possible Branch Technical Positions (BTP) in NUREG 0800, Rev. 0, Table 18.0-2. This report is a compilation of comments and suggestions from the people who used NUREG 0700 in the Control Room field reviews. This information was used to establish possible BTP topic priorities so that the most important BTPs could be issued first. The comments and suggestions are included for HFEB review in conjunction with the table of priorities.

Savage, J.W.

1982-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

160

A Technical Review of Interference Testing with Application in the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Program under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AT03-80SF11459 and by the Department of Petroleum.S.I.R., Wellington. Financial support was provided by M.W.D., New Zealand Energy Department, Stanford Geoth- ermal testing and relatdd earth tide arid compressibility effects are reviewed. Hydrological information from

Stanford University

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Thermal-Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Thermal-Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain During the Preclosure and Postclosure Phases July 2008 #12;Thermal Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain July 2008 Page of the thermal response of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository for various thermal loadings. The U. S. Nuclear

162

Industrial Energy Efficiency Technical Review Guidelines and Best Practices  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of commercial and other sector programs. The following programs were deemed to represent the best combination of applicability and access to relevant information: ? BC Hydro?s Power Smart Partners - Industrial (Transmission and Distribution...) ? Wisconsin?s Focus on Energy ? Industrial ? California Public Utilities Commission?s (CPUC) Southern California Industrial and Agricultural (SCIA) and Pacific Gas & Electric?s (PG&E) Fabrication, Process and Manufacturing Review of Impact Evaluation...

Dalziel, N.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

163

Reviewing PSA-based analyses to modify technical specifications at nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Changes to Technical Specifications (TSs) at nuclear power plants (NPPs) require review and approval by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). Currently, many requests for changes to TSs use analyses that are based on a plant`s probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). This report presents an approach to reviewing such PSA-based submittals for changes to TSs. We discuss the basic objectives of reviewing a PSA-based submittal to modify NPP TSs; the methodology of reviewing a TS submittal, and the differing roles of a PSA review, a PSA Computer Code review, and a review of a TS submittal. To illustrate this approach, we discuss our review of changes to allowed outage time (AOT) and surveillance test interval (STI) in the TS for the South Texas Project Nuclear Generating Station. Based on this experience gained, a check-list of items is given for future reviewers; it can be used to verify that the submittal contains sufficient information, and also that the review has addressed the relevant issues. Finally, recommended steps in the review process and the expected findings of each step are discussed.

Samanta, P.K.; Martinez-Guridi, G. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Vesely, W.E. [Science Applications International Corporation, Dublin, OH (United States)

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Congressional panel makes recommendations on belt safety  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006 (MINER Act) called for a Technical Study Panel to present a review and make recommendations on the use of belt air and the composition and fire retardant properties of belt materials in underground coal mining. In October 2007 the Panel released 20 recommendations publicly. These are presented in the article. Many recommendations encouraged the MSHA to enforce existing laws of maintenance and fire protection or example more vigorously. Maybe the biggest change recommended was that the industry should adopt the Belt Evaluation Laboratory Test (BELT) standard proposed in 1992. Another important recommendation was one that would help eliminate hazards associated with point feeding. 1 photo.

Fiscor, S.

2007-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

165

Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. This SRP (hereafter refers to as the Engineering SRP) provides consistent review guidance to assure that engineering and technical requirements are appropriately applied for the design, operations and disposition2 of DOE nuclear facilities. It is one of a series of three SRPs developed by the CNS. The other two SRPs address: 1) nuclear safety basis program review; and 2) application of requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, for DOE Critical Decision (CD) review and approval. These SRPs may be revised in the future to reflect changes in the DOE requirements, lessons learned, and experience/insights from nuclear facility design, operations, and disposition.

166

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (Documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 1996 February 1996 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 Date November 2005 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS DOCUMENTS (DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES AND TECHNICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS) U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, Fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Adminis tration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

167

ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS This document provides guidance and objectives and criteria to support assessments required by DOE O 426.1 Federal Technical Capability (FTC), Section 4. REQUIREMENTS, paragraph b. FTC Program Implementation, subparagraph (7) Self- Assessment. This FTC Order paragraph requires self-assessment of TQP and FTC Program implementation within one's organization. To ensure effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP), Headquarters and field elements conduct self-assessments of these programs. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self-assessments and determines if further action is

168

Venice Sustainability Advisory Panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Venice Sustainability Advisory PanelFINAL REPORT Venice Sustainability Advisory Panel FinalInvestigator The Venice Sustainability Advisory Panel (

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

Technical Review of Retrieval and Closure Plans for the INEEL INTEC Tank Farm Facility  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to document the conclusions of a technical review of retrieval and closure plans for the Idaho National Energy and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) Tank Farm Facility. In addition to reviewing retrieval and closure plans for these tanks, the review process served as an information exchange mechanism so that staff in the INEEL High Level Waste (HLW) Program could become more familiar with retrieval and closure approaches that have been completed or are planned for underground storage tanks at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Hanford sites. This review focused not only on evaluation of the technical feasibility and appropriateness of the approach selected by INEEL but also on technology gaps that could be addressed through utilization of technologies or performance data available at other DOE sites and in the private sector. The reviewers, Judith Bamberger of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Dr. Barry Burks of The Providence Group Applied Technology, have extensive experience in the development and application of tank waste retrieval technologies for nuclear waste remediation.

Bamberger, Judith A; Burks, Barry L; Quigley, Keith D; Falter, Diedre D

2001-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

170

Senior Technical Safety Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1175-2013 October 2013 DOE STANDARD SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1175-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://energy.gov/hss/information-center/department-energy-technical-standards-program ii DOE-STD-11 75-2013 APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the Qualification Standard for Department-wide

171

Report on the Software Environments Technical Research Review Jerey J. Blevins, E. James Whitehead, Jr., and Harry E. Yessayan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Jr., and Harry E. Yessayan organized by: Leon J. Osterweil and Richard N. Taylor Irvine Research UnitReport on the Software Environments Technical Research Review Jerey J. Blevins, E. James Whitehead

Whitehead, James

172

A Review of Vacuum Degradation Research and the Experimental Outgassing Research of the Core Material- Pu foam on Vacuum Insulation Panels  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Vacuum Insulation Panels(VIPs) have been regarded as a super thermal insulation material with a thermal resistance of about 5-8 times higher than that of equally thick conventional polyurethane boards. In this paper, the researches on factors influencing interior pressure in VIPs, including gas and water vapor permeation through the barrier and outgassing of the core materials, were reviewed respectively. Following this, aiming at the outgassing from open cell PU foam, the specific outgassing rate of the core material is tested not only at room temperature but also at low and high temperatures by an orifice known-conductance method.

C.G. Yang; Y.J. Li; X. Gao; L. Xu

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

patch panel  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In a communications system, a board, panel, or console that (a) is equipped with a jackfield mounted on its surface and (b) enables connection to various points in the system for patching, monitoring, and testing...

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Interconnection Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentationgiven at at the Fall 2012 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meetingdiscusses the interconnection panel, including an overview of the generation interconnection process (GIP), and interconnection agreements and their terms.

175

Savannah River Site - Tank 48 Briefing on SRS Tank 48 Independent Technical Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Tank 48 Tank 48 Independent Technical Review August 2006 2 SRS Tank 48 ITR SRS Tank 48 ITR Key ITR Observation Two distinct problems: Removing tetraphenylborate (TPB) waste and then cleaning the tank sufficiently to support return to service Processing contents to eliminate TPB hazard August 2006 3 SRS Tank 48 ITR SRS Tank 48 ITR Overarching ITR Conclusions 1. TPB Processing is on the right track - DOE/WSRC have selected the most promising candidates - Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (FBSR) is the most technically attractive and mature of the candidate processes August 2006 4 SRS Tank 48 ITR SRS Tank 48 ITR Overarching Conclusions (continued) 2. Heel removal and tank cleanout will be a very challenging task. Compounding issues: - Physical difficulties in cleanout (access, congestion, etc.)

176

Technical Letter Report: Evaluation and Analysis of a Few International Periodic Safety Review Summary Reports  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the request of the United States (U.S.) government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assembled a team of 20 senior safety experts to review the regulatory framework for the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States. This review focused on the effectiveness of the regulatory functions implemented by the NRC and on its commitment to nuclear safety and continuous improvement. One suggestion resulting from that review was that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) incorporate lessons learned from periodic safety reviews (PSRs) performed in other countries as an input to the NRCs assessment processes. In the U.S., commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) are granted an initial 40-year operating license, which may be renewed for additional 20-year periods, subject to complying with regulatory requirements. The NRC has established a framework through its inspection, and operational experience processes to ensure the safe operation of licensed nuclear facilities on an ongoing basis. In contrast, most other countries do not impose a specific time limit on the operating licenses for NPPs, they instead require that the utility operating the plant perform PSRs, typically at approximately 10-year intervals, to assure continued safe operation until the next assessment. The staff contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) to perform a pilot review of selected translated PSR assessment reports and related documentation from foreign nuclear regulatory authorities to identify any potential new regulatory insights regarding license renewal-related topics and NPP operating experience (OpE). A total of 14 PSR assessment documents from 9 countries were reviewed. For all of the countries except France, individual reports were provided for each of the plants reviewed. In the case of France, three reports were provided that reviewed the performance assessment of thirty-four 900-MWe reactors of similar design commissioned between 1978 and 1988. All of the reports reviewed were the regulators assessment of the PSR findings rather than the original PSR report, and all but one were English translations from the original language. In these reviews, it was found that most of the countries base their regulatory guidance to some extent (and often to a large extent) on U.S. design codes and standards, NRC regulatory guidance, and U.S. industry guidance. In addition, many of the observed operational technical issues and OpE events reported for U.S. reactors are also cited in the PSR reports. The PSR reports also identified a number of potential technical material/component performance issues and OpE events that are not commonly reported for U.S. plants.

Chopra, Omesh K. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Diercks, Dwight R. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Nuclear Engineering Division; Ma, David Chia-Chiun [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Garud, Yogendra S. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division

2013-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

177

March 29, 2011, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Face-to-Face Meeting - FY 2011 Operational Plan Goals Status for Goal 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Functional Area Qualification Standards Enhancements Functional Area Qualification Standards Enhancements Deborah Monette, Champion Status: ◦ Developed Action Plan ◦ Conducted Initial Conference Call Next Steps: Next Steps: ◦ Identify viable qualification paths (4/15) Staged qualification from Entry to Expert ◦ Revise "Expert" definition in FAQS' (4/15) Knowledge and practical experience based ◦ Produce qualification path plan for FTCP Agent ◦ Produce qualification path plan for FTCP Agent comment/approval (7/30) Status: ◦ Action Plan submitted for Panel approval ◦ Brief Panel on Human Factors Engineering (3/29) Next Steps: Next Steps: ◦ Identify competencies and supporting knowledge and skills related to HFE for selected TQP functional areas (5/30) ◦ Panel approve HFE competencies (7/30)

178

Safeguards and Security General Technical Base Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23-2009 23-2009 July 2009 DOE STANDARD SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY GENERAL TECHNICAL BASE QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1123-2009 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1123-2009 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the qualification standard for Department-wide

179

A Technical Review on Biomass Processing: Densification, Preprocessing, Modeling and Optimization  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

It is now a well-acclaimed fact that burning fossil fuels and deforestation are major contributors to climate change. Biomass from plants can serve as an alternative renewable and carbon-neutral raw material for the production of bioenergy. Low densities of 4060 kg/m3 for lignocellulosic and 200400 kg/m3 for woody biomass limits their application for energy purposes. Prior to use in energy applications these materials need to be densified. The densified biomass can have bulk densities over 10 times the raw material helping to significantly reduce technical limitations associated with storage, loading and transportation. Pelleting, briquetting, or extrusion processing are commonly used methods for densification. The aim of the present research is to develop a comprehensive review of biomass processing that includes densification, preprocessing, modeling and optimization. The specific objective include carrying out a technical review on (a) mechanisms of particle bonding during densification; (b) methods of densification including extrusion, briquetting, pelleting, and agglomeration; (c) effects of process and feedstock variables and biomass biochemical composition on the densification (d) effects of preprocessing such as grinding, preheating, steam explosion, and torrefaction on biomass quality and binding characteristics; (e) models for understanding the compression characteristics; and (f) procedures for response surface modeling and optimization.

Jaya Shankar Tumuluru; Christopher T. Wright

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

180

Review of Technical Studies in the United States in Support of Burnup Credit Regulatory Guidance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Taking credit for the reduction in reactivity associated with fuel depletion can enable more cost-effective, higher-density storage, transport, disposal, and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) while maintaining sufficient subcritical margin to establish an adequate safety basis. Consequently, there continues to be considerable interest in the United States (U.S.), as well as internationally, in the increased use of burnup credit in SNF operations, particularly related to storage, transport, and disposal of commercial SNF. This interest has motivated numerous technical studies related to the application of burnup credit, both domestically and internationally, as well as the design of SNF storage, transport and disposal systems that rely on burnup credit for maintaining subcriticality. Responding to industry requests and needs, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated a burnup credit research program in 1999, with support from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to develop regulatory guidance and the supporting technical bases for allowing and expanding the use of burnup credit in pressurized-water reactor SNF storage and transport applications. Although this NRC research program has not been continuous since its inception, considerable progress has been achieved in many key areas in terms of increased understanding of relevant phenomena and issues, availability of relevant information and data, and subsequently updated regulatory guidance for expanded use of burnup credit. This paper reviews technical studies performed by ORNL for the U.S. NRC burnup credit research program. Examples of topics include reactivity effects associated with reactor operating characteristics, fuel assembly characteristics, burnable absorbers, control rods, spatial burnup distributions, cooling time, and assembly misloading; methods and data for validation of isotopic composition predictions; methods and data for validation of criticality calculations; and operational issues and data related to assembly burnup confirmation. The objective of this paper is to summarize the work and significant accomplishments, with references to the technical reports and publications for complete details, and provide a useful resource to others in the burnup credit community.

Wagner, John C [ORNL] [ORNL; Parks, Cecil V [ORNL] [ORNL; Mueller, Don [ORNL] [ORNL; Gauld, Ian C [ORNL] [ORNL

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Human-system Interfaces to Automatic Systems: Review Guidance and Technical Basis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Automation has become ubiquitous in modern complex systems and commercial nuclear power plants are no exception. Beyond the control of plant functions and systems, automation is applied to a wide range of additional functions including monitoring and detection, situation assessment, response planning, response implementation, and interface management. Automation has become a 'team player' supporting plant personnel in nearly all aspects of plant operation. In light of the increasing use and importance of automation in new and future plants, guidance is needed to enable the NRC staff to conduct safety reviews of the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of modern automation. The objective of the research described in this report was to develop guidance for reviewing the operator's interface with automation. We first developed a characterization of the important HFE aspects of automation based on how it is implemented in current systems. The characterization included five dimensions: Level of automation, function of automation, modes of automation, flexibility of allocation, and reliability of automation. Next, we reviewed literature pertaining to the effects of these aspects of automation on human performance and the design of human-system interfaces (HSIs) for automation. Then, we used the technical basis established by the literature to develop design review guidance. The guidance is divided into the following seven topics: Automation displays, interaction and control, automation modes, automation levels, adaptive automation, error tolerance and failure management, and HSI integration. In addition, we identified insights into the automaton design process, operator training, and operations.

OHara, J.M.; Higgins, J.C.

2010-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

182

SCFA lead lab technical assistance review of the Pit 7 Complex source containment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On January 29-30, 2001 a technical assistance team (TAT) met with the Pit 7 project team at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to review technologies being evaluated for remediation in the Site 300 Pit 7 Complex and the process for selecting these technologies. Specifically, the project team presented the TAT with a core need to identify technically and economically practicable technologies and methods to stabilize, contain, or control the tritium and uranium in the source areas at the Pits 3 and 5 landfill area to prevent further releases of these contaminants to groundwater and the migration of tritiated and uranium-contaminated groundwater. The approaches and needs for the systems surrounding the landfills were also presented and discussed. With encouragement from the project team, the TAT expanded its focus to include additional site characterization, a water balance model, and computational models. The TAT was comprised of leading technical and regulatory experts from around the country and was assembled by SCFA's Lead Lab in response to a technical assistance request from John Ziagos, Project Manager for the Pit 7 Area (Technical Assistance Request: LLNL No.1). A list of the TAT members is included below and contact information the TAT members and site participants is in Appendix B. To familiarize the TAT assistance team with Pit 7 Complex issues, the project team gave a presentation outlining the site geology, contaminant hydrogeology, land-use issues, stakeholder concerns, regulatory requirements, groundwater flow and transport modeling efforts, pit source characterization efforts, and remedial options. Time for clarification and questions between the TAT and the site team was integrated into the presentation schedule. On the morning of the second day, the TAT reconvened with the site team and John Evans of the TAT presented information about a helium soil gas survey method that could potentially be used to locate and characterize tritium hot spots in Pits 3 and 5. Following the presentation, the TAT gathered independently to identify issues that are critical to remedy selection and to list questions or information gaps that the site is trying to resolve.

Eaton, D.; Janeday, D.; Woodward, D.; Imrich, J.; Evans, J.; Morris, M.; Reimus, P.; Hazen, T.

2001-01-29T23:59:59.000Z

183

Spent fuel sabotage test program, characterization of aerosol dispersal : technical review and analysis supplement.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project seeks to provide vital data required to assess the consequences of a terrorist attack on a spent fuel transportation cask. One such attack scenario involves the use of conical shaped charges (CSC), which are capable of damaging a spent fuel transportation cask. In the event of such an attack, the amount of radioactivity that may be released as respirable aerosols is not known with great certainty. Research to date has focused on measuring the aerosol release from single short surrogate fuel rodlets subjected to attack by a small CSC device in various aerosol chamber designs. The last series of three experiments tested surrogate fuel rodlets made with depleted uranium oxide ceramic pellets in a specially designed double chamber aerosol containment apparatus. This robust testing apparatus was designed to prevent any radioactive release and allow high level radioactive waste disposal of the entire apparatus following testing of actual spent fuel rodlets as proposed. DOE and Sandia reviews of the project to date identified a number of issues. The purpose of this supplemental report is to address and document the DOE review comments and to resolve the issues identified in the Sandia technical review.

Durbin, Samuel G.; Lindgren, Eric Richard

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

STFC Astronomy Advisory Panel Report (October 2012) STFC Astronomy Advisory Panel report (October 2012) 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;STFC Astronomy Advisory Panel Report (October 2012) STFC Astronomy Advisory Panel report (October 2012) 1 STFC Astronomy Advisory Panel 2012 Programmatic Review report to PPAN (October 2012) Executive summary This document provides a roadmap for UK astronomy and provides advice for future science

Crowther, Paul

185

Report of the technical review team on the Catalytic Extraction Process  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The TRT was impressed with the quality and volume of laboratory and pilot scale development work that had been conducted over the past year. Many of the doubts and questions raised by the TRP on technical details had been examined, either by theoretical calculations or in the pilot facility. Moreover, a more open and forthcoming attitude was evident among the MMT staff who either presented briefings or responded to the Team`s questions. Of special note to DOE, the TRP recognized a year ago that the pilot facility at Fall River was not designed for radioactive pilot tests. However, from the dialogue surrounding the TRP review, it was evident that not much thought had been given to the hazards, concerns, and special requirements incumbent with radioactive operations -- everything from doing pours of hot radioactive metal from a vessel to remote-handling equipment and operations. This year the TRT noticed a significant improvement in this respect.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Technical Review of the CENWP Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of the John Day Dam Forebay  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District (CENWP) has developed a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the John Day forebay on the Columbia River to aid in the development and design of alternatives to improve juvenile salmon passage at the John Day Project. At the request of CENWP, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Hydrology Group has conducted a technical review of CENWP's CFD model run in CFD solver software, STAR-CD. PNNL has extensive experience developing and applying 3D CFD models run in STAR-CD for Columbia River hydroelectric projects. The John Day forebay model developed by CENWP is adequately configured and validated. The model is ready for use simulating forebay hydraulics for structural and operational alternatives. The approach and method are sound, however CENWP has identified some improvements that need to be made for future models and for modifications to this existing model.

Rakowski, Cynthia L.; Serkowski, John A.; Richmond, Marshall C.

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

Greater-than-Class C low-level waste characterization technical review process  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Existing volume projections of greater-than-Class C low-level waste (GTCC LLW) vary significantly. The Department of Energy (DOE) National Low-Level Waste Management Program (NLLWMP) has undertaken activities to develop a best estimate of GTCC LLW volumes and activities for use as the planning basis. Initial information about the generation of GTCC LLW was obtained through a DOE Energy Information Administration survey. That information, combined with information from other related literature, formed the basis of a computer model, which projects potential GTCC LLW. This paper describes uncertainties in existing GTCC LLW characterization and volume projections data and describes the technical review process that is being used to assist in projections of GTCC LLW expected for storage and disposal. 8 refs., 2 tabs.

Hutchison, D.; Magleby, M.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

1994 Panel 1 Utilization Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is intended to receive, handle, and permanently dispose of transuranic (TRU) waste. To fulfill this mission, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) constructed a full-scale facility to demonstrate both technical and operational principles of the permanent isolation of TRU waste. The WIPP consists of surface and underground facilities. Panel 1 is situated in the underground facility horizon which is located approximately 2,150 feet below the surface in the predominantly halite Salado Formation. The Panel 1 Utilization Plan provides a strategy for the optimum use of Panel 1 which is consistent with the priorities established by the DOE to accomplish the WIPP mission. These priorities, which include maintaining personnel safety, conducting performance assessment, and continued operational enhancements, are the guiding premise for the decisions on the planned usage of the WIPP underground facility. The continuation of ongoing investigations along with the planned testing and training to be carried out in Panel 1 will enhance the current knowledge and understanding of the operational and geotechnical aspects of the panel configuration. This enhancement will ultimately lead to safer, more efficient, and more cost-effective methods of operation. Excavation of the waste storage area began in May 1986 with the mining of entries to Panel 1. The original design for the waste storage rooms at the WIPP provided a limited period of time during which to mine the openings and to emplace waste. Each panel, consisting of seven storage rooms, was scheduled to be mined and filled in less than 5 years. Panel 1 was developed to receive waste for a demonstration phase that was scheduled to start in October 1988. The demonstration phase was deferred, and the experimental test program was modified to use contact-handled (CH) transuranic waste in bin-scale tests, planned for Room 1, Panel 1.

Not Available

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

Technical cooperation on nuclear security between the United States and China : review of the past and opportunities for the future.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States and China are committed to cooperation to address the challenges of the next century. Technical cooperation, building on a long tradition of technical exchange between the two countries, can play an important role. This paper focuses on technical cooperation between the United States and China in the areas of nonproliferation, arms control and other nuclear security topics. It reviews cooperation during the 1990s on nonproliferation and arms control under the U.S.-China Arms Control Exchange, discusses examples of ongoing activities under the Peaceful Uses of Technology Agreement to enhance security of nuclear and radiological material, and suggests opportunities for expanding technical cooperation between the defense nuclear laboratories of both countries to address a broader range of nuclear security topics.

Pregenzer, Arian Leigh

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

88 JOURNAL OF WEATHER MODiFiCATiON vOLUME 43 -TECHNICAL NOTES -CORRESPONDENCE -BOOK REVIEW  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

88 JOURNAL OF WEATHER MODiFiCATiON vOLUME 43 - TECHNICAL NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE - BOOK REVIEW much to unravel about the intricacies of aerosol interactions with tropical cyclones. First we need of other factors influencing TC intensity including SST, wind shear, and the moisture content of the lower

Rhode Island, University of

191

110 kW Stationary Combined Heat and Power Systems Status and Technical Potential: Independent Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This independent review examines the status and technical potential of 1-10 kW stationary combined heat and power fuel cell systems and analyzes the achievability of the DOE cost, efficiency, and durability targets for 2012, 2015, and 2020.

192

Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 15, Nos. 3/4, 1996 Report of the FESAC Inertial Fusion Energy Review Panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 15, Nos. 3/4, 1996 Report of the FESAC Inertial Fusion Energy Review Marshall Rosenbluth, H,~3 William Tang, 12 and Ernest Valeo 12 Dr. Robert W. Conn, Chair Fusion Energy on a specific recommendation made by your Committee in its report, "A Restructured Fusion Energy Sciences Pro

Abdou, Mohamed

193

Detector Advisory Panel (DAP) Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ATLAS Project Manager's Review ATLAS Project Manager's Review 1-2 April 2010 Panel Members Lothar Bauerdick, FNAL Ray Larsen, SLAC Ronald Lipton, FNAL David Morrison, BNL Robert Roser, FNAL Steve Wolbers, FNAL Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York 10 May 2010 Executive Summary The Detector and Computing Advisory Panels (DAP and CAP) reviewed the status and plans of the US-ATLAS Program at Brookhaven National Laboratory on April 1-2, 2010. The Panel was extremely pleased to hear of the highly successful commissioning of the ATLAS detector during early LHC collisions. The detector operated successfully, with no worse than 97% active channel count in any subsystem, from the start of collisions. There appears to be an excellent understanding of the detector performance via simulations. The BNL computing center has

194

A Technical Review of Penning Trap based Investigations in Neutron Decay  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This review is concerned with a detailed analysis of some of the technical problems which arise in the application of the Penning trap method to the experimental study of neutron $\\beta $ -decay,a technique which was first successfully tested on the low-flux swimming-pool reactor LIDO (capture flux =3$\\cdot 10^6$cm$^(-2)$s$^(-1)$) at AERE Harwell in the 1970's. It does not discuss the scientific merits or demerits of these studies. Of particular importance are the trapping and release of neutron decay protons, and the influence of magnetic mirror effects and radial drifting on the trapped particles. Since these have energies < 1 keV they must be accelerated to energies of order 20-30 keV following release, at which point they are recorded in a silicon surface barrier detector. However serious difficulties were encountered in the post-release acceleration process with vacuum breakdown in the presence of crossed electric and magnetic fields.

Byrne, J

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

A Technical Review of Penning Trap based Investigations in Neutron Decay  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This review is concerned with a detailed analysis of some of the technical problems which arise in the application of the Penning trap method to the experimental study of neutron $\\beta $ -decay,a technique which was first successfully tested on the low-flux swimming-pool reactor LIDO (capture flux =3$\\cdot 10^6$cm$^(-2)$s$^(-1)$) at AERE Harwell in the 1970's. It does not discuss the scientific merits or demerits of these studies. Of particular importance are the trapping and release of neutron decay protons, and the influence of magnetic mirror effects and radial drifting on the trapped particles. Since these have energies < 1 keV they must be accelerated to energies of order 20-30 keV following release, at which point they are recorded in a silicon surface barrier detector. However serious difficulties were encountered in the post-release acceleration process with vacuum breakdown in the presence of crossed electric and magnetic fields.

J. Byrne

2014-07-11T23:59:59.000Z

196

MAKING SOLAR PANELS GREENER  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

MAKING SOLAR PANELS GREENER ... Producing PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS more sustainably will require reducing energy consumption, toxic substances ... For example, consider crystalline silicon-based photovoltaic solar panels, which currently boast about 80% of the global market. ...

SARAH EVERTS

2011-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

197

INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE C-400 INTERIM REMEDIAL PROJECT PHASE I RESULTS, PADUCAH, KENTUCKY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The groundwater and soil in the vicinity of the C-400 Building at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), is contaminated with substantial quantities of industrial solvents, primarily trichoroethene (TCE). This solvent 'source' is recognized as a significant challenge and an important remediation target in the overall environmental cleanup strategy for PGDP. Thus, the cleanup of the C-400 TCE Source is a principal focus for the Department of Energy (DOE) and its contractors, and for PGDP regulators and stakeholders. Using a formal investigation, feasibility study and decision process, Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) was selected for the treatment of the soil and groundwater in the vicinity of C-400. ERH was selected as an interim action to remove 'a significant portion of the contaminant mass of TCE at the C-400 Cleaning Building area through treatment' with the longer term goal of reducing 'the period the TCE concentration in groundwater remains above its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL).' ERH is a thermal treatment that enhances the removal of TCE and related solvents from soil and groundwater. The heterogeneous conditions at PGDP, particularly the high permeability regional gravel aquifer (RGA), are challenging to ERH. Thus, a phased approach is being followed to implement this relatively expensive and complex remediation technology. Conceptually, the phased approach encourages safety and efficiency by providing a 'lessons learned' process and allowing appropriate adjustments to be identified and implemented prior to follow-on phase(s) of treatment. More specifically, early deployment targeted portions of the challenging RGA treatment zone with relatively little contamination reducing the risk of adverse collateral impacts from underperformance in terms of heating and capture. Because of the importance and scope of the C-400 TCE source remediation activities, DOE chartered an Independent Technical Review (ITR) in 2007 to assess the C-400 ERH plans prior to deployment and a second ITR to evaluate Phase I performance in September 2010. In this report, these ITR efforts are referenced as the '2007 ITR' and the 'current ITR', respectively. The 2007 ITR document (Looney et al., 2007) provided a detailed technical evaluation that remains relevant and this report builds on that analysis. The primary objective of the current ITR is to provide an expedited assessment of the available Phase I data to assist the PGDP team as they develop the lessons learned from Phase I and prepare plans for Phase II.

Looney, B.; Rossabi, J.; Stewart,L.; Richards, W.

2010-10-29T23:59:59.000Z

198

NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-573 A Biological Review of the Tortugas Pink Shrimp Fishery  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Avenue U Galveston, Texas 77551 October 2008 #12;NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-573 A Biological Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center Galveston Laboratory 4700 National Technical Information Center National Marine Fisheries Service 5825 Port Royal Galveston

199

Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report, October 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report ASRP-N0-10.2.2012-469406 Title : Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Lead Assessor: James Todd, SSO FTCP Agent Team Members: Shirley Ireland, Dave Rast, Wendy Sawyer, and Allen Tate Self assessnnent ASM-N0-9.13.2012-464813 Number: Dates Conducted: 9/17 -10/12, 2012 Self Asse;ssment Scope This self assessment examined how Sandia Site Office (SSO) executes the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan. Self Asse.ssment Summary The Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program is implemented. Site office technical personnel responsible for providing assistance, guidance, direction, or oversight that could affect

200

Proceedings of the technical review on advances in geothermal reservoir technology---Research in progress  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This proceedings contains 20 technical papers and abstracts describing most of the research activities funded by the Department of Energy (DOE's) Geothermal Reservoir Technology Program, which is under the management of Marshall Reed. The meeting was organized in response to several requests made by geothermal industry representatives who wanted to learn more about technical details of the projects supported by the DOE program. Also, this gives them an opportunity to personally discuss research topics with colleagues in the national laboratories and universities.

Lippmann, M.J. (ed.)

1988-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

GIS Ethics Panel Preparation Panel Session  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

GIS Ethics Panel Preparation Panel Session: 3236 Geographic Information Ethics and GIScience II State University Geney Terry - GISCI Session Description: Ethical engagements with the multitude of GIS, the variety of applications of GIS&T has led the U.S. Department of Labor to highlight "geographic technology

Wright, Dawn Jeannine

202

Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review Harry Harmon January 9, 2007 2 U.S. Department of Energy Outline * SWPF Process Overview * Major Risks * Approach for Conducting Review * Discussion of Findings * Conclusions 3 U.S. Department of Energy Salt Waste Processing Facility 4 U.S. Department of Energy SWPF Process Overview Alpha Finishing Process CSSX Alpha Strike Process MST/ Sludge Cs Strip Effluent DSS 5 U.S. Department of Energy BOTTOM LINE The SWPF Project is ready to move into final design. 6 U.S. Department of Energy Major Risks * Final geotechnical data potentially could result in redesign of the PC-3 CPA base mat and structure. * Cost and schedule impacts arising from the change from ISO-9001 to NQA-1 quality assurance requirements. * The "de-inventory, flush, and then hands-on

203

External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Monica C. Regalbuto Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM Kevin G. Brown Vanderbilt University and CRESP David W. DePaoli Oak Ridge National Laboratory Candido Pereira Argonne National Laboratory John R. Shultz Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Acknowledgements The Review Team thanks Mr. Glyn Trenchard, Team Lead for Planning and Coordination Waste Disposition Project, U.S. Department of Energy--Office of River Protection, Mr. Paul Rutland, RPP System Planning Manager for Washington River Protection Solutions, and Mr. Ernie Lee,

204

Agenda for the Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group (BILIWG) Hydrogen Production Technical Team Research Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

& Hydrogen Production Technical Team Research Review Agenda for Tuesday, November 6, 2007 Location: BCS Incorporated, 8929 Stephens Road, Laurel, MD. 20723 410-997-7778 8:30 - 9:00 Continental Breakfast 9:00 DOE Targets, Tools and Technology o Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Targets DOE, Arlene Anderson o H2A Overview, NREL, Darlene Steward o Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Cost Analysis DTI, Brian James 10:00 Research Review o Low-Cost Hydrogen Distributed Production Systems, H2Gen, Sandy Thomas o Integrated Short Contact Time Hydrogen Generator, GE Global Research, Wei Wei o Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming, NREL, Darlene Steward o High Pressure Steam Ethanol Reforming, ANL, Romesh Kumar

205

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 20042009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to characterize one site, at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, to determine its behavior of a Yucca Mountain repository, (b) developing a reposi tory design, (c) reducing technical understanding of the potential behavior of a repository at Yucca Mountain, (b) developing a repository design

206

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2003 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2003 Annual Plan Washington, D.C. 20585 September 2002 FTCP FY 2003 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) provides management direction to assist the Federal workforce in maintaining necessary technical competencies to safely operate its defense nuclear facilities. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities, and reports to the Deputy Secretary for workforce safety technical capabilities' matters. The Panel will continue to pursue progress in the following areas: 1. Continued development of senior management commitment and support for the technical intern

207

Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Meeting Minutes May 22, 2013 The May 22, 2013 F2F Meeting was held thru VTC, video streaming and call-in number. Karen Boardman welcomed the FTCP and expressed her appreciation for the participation and support. She emphasized to everyone that we would work thru the meeting in regards to the new technology capabilities being used (VTC, video streaming, etc.) for the first time on this DOE FTCP Face-to-Face meeting. There were some issues with the video streaming and at the end of the meeting Ms. Boardman thanked everyone for the participation. She also asked everyone to provide feedback regarding the VTC and video streaming. As part of Ms. Boardman's welcome, she informed the group that Mark Alsdorf, NTC Nuclear Safety Training Program Manager (NSTPM) has retired from the DOE, and introduced Al MacDougall who will be on detail to

208

E-Print Network 3.0 - advisory panel meeting Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

that meets throughout the year. Recommendations from the Independent... Review Panel and Peer Review Group members. The Independent Scientific ... Source: Northwest Power Planning...

209

Low-level liquid radioactive waste treatment at Murmansk, Russia: Technical design and review of facility upgrade and expansion  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The governments of Norway and the US have committed their mutual cooperation and support the Murmansk Shipping Company (MSCo) to expand and upgrade the Low-Level Liquid Radioactive Waste (LLRW) treatment system located at the facilities of the Russian company RTP Atomflot, in Murmansk, Russia. RTP Atomflot provides support services to the Russian icebreaker fleet operated by the MSCo. The objective is to enable Russia to permanently cease disposing of this waste in Arctic waters. The proposed modifications will increase the facility`s capacity from 1,200 m{sup 3} per year to 5,000 m{sup 3} per year, will permit the facility to process high-salt wastes from the Russian Navy`s Northern fleet, and will improve the stabilization and interim storage of the processed wastes. The three countries set up a cooperative review of the evolving design information, conducted by a joint US and Norwegian technical team from April through December, 1995. To ensure that US and Norwegian funds produce a final facility which will meet the objectives, this report documents the design as described by Atomflot and the Russian business organization, ASPECT, both in design documents and orally. During the detailed review process, many questions were generated, and many design details developed which are outlined here. The design is based on the adsorption of radionuclides on selected inorganic resins, and desalination and concentration using electromembranes. The US/Norwegian technical team reviewed the available information and recommended that the construction commence; they also recommended that a monitoring program for facility performance be instituted.

Dyer, R.S.; Diamante, J.M. [Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (United States). Office of International Activities; Duffey, R.B. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)] [and others

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical Support- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Lieko Earle, National Renewable Energy Laboratory The goal of this project is for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to provide extensive, hands-on technical support to Building America teams in the areas of experiment design, provision of research-grade measurement hardware, energy modeling, and analysis. Building Americas field testsregularly conducted by both Building America teams and national laboratoriesdemonstrate the programs best house system innovations. The tests enable cost-effective evaluation of real-world performance and help ensure that all Building America field tests result in high-impact findings that push builders and homeowners to higher levels of savings.

211

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2008 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program George Thomas, Sandia National Laboratory, retired This award recognizes George Thomas' past and continued technical excellence and outstanding dedication to the DOE Hydrogen Program in support of the President's Advanced Energy Initiative and the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative. Thomas' contributions to the Hydrogen Storage activity have

212

Hanford ETR - Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - Estimate at Completion (Cost) Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Comprehensive Review of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Estimate at Completion Assessment Conducted by an Independent Team of External Experts March 2006 Comprehensive Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Estimate at Completion Page i of vi Executive Summary Following an August 2005 corporate commitment to the Secretary of Energy, Bechtel National, Inc. chartered a team of industry experts to review the technical, cost, and schedule aspects of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) project. This summary reflects the observations and recommendations of the EAC Review Team (ERT), comprised of six senior industry consultants, six retired Bechtel employees, one current Bechtel employee, three employees of Bechtel's competitors, and

213

1…10 kW Stationary Combined Heat and Power Systems Status and Technical Potential: Independent Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1-10 kW Stationary Combined Heat 1-10 kW Stationary Combined Heat and Power Systems Status and Technical Potential National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard * Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Independent Review Published for the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program NREL/BK-6A10-48265 November 2010 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or

214

Patch Panel Control Room  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Patch Panel CCR-EE-092 Control Room CCR-EE-100 Control Room Optic Patch Rack CSS-EE-954 Junction (PC Fault Event) Patch Panel CCC-EE-209 Junction Area E O PC Fault Event PC Fault Event PC Fault Event CNBS-EE-358 138' Level Patch Panel CNBS-EE-389 138' Level E E E Crates 9, 19 COH1-EE-651 FCPC Crates 21

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

215

Solar reflection panels  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A solar collector comprising a glass mirror, and a composite panel, wherein the back of the mirror is affixed to a front surface of the composite panel. The composite panel comprises a front sheet affixed to a surface of a core material, preferably a core material comprising a honeycomb structure, and a back sheet affixed to an opposite surface of the core material. The invention may further comprise a sealing strip, preferably comprising EPDM, positioned between the glass mirror and the front surface of the composite panel. The invention also is of methods of making such solar collectors.

Diver, Jr., Richard B. (Albuquerque, NM); Grossman, James W. (Albuquerque, NM); Reshetnik, Michael (Boulder, CO)

2006-07-18T23:59:59.000Z

216

E-Print Network 3.0 - ad hoc panel Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

panel Search Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: ad hoc panel Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Part 500, Chapter 25 SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT REVIEW...

217

Federal Technical Capability Program Assessment Guidance and Criteria  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE AND CRITERIA Federal Technical Capability Panel and the Office of Human Resources and Administration U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 September 1998 Federal Technical Capability Program Assessment Guidance and Criteria 1 September 15, 1998 INTRODUCTION The Federal Technical Capability Program provides for the recruitment, deployment, development and retention of federal personnel with the demonstrated technical capability to safely accomplish the Department' s missions and responsibilities. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) reports to the Deputy Secretary and oversees and resolves issues affecting the Federal Technical Capability Program. The Panel periodically assesses the effectiveness of the four functions of the

218

CERTS 2012 Program Review - NASPI Leadership and Task Team Technical Support - Joe Gracia, ORNL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ORNL's Support of NASPI ORNL's Support of NASPI Presented at: DOE OE Transmission Reliability Program Review ORNL Team: Jose R. Gracia, P.E. (Presenter) D. Tom Rizy Isabelle Snyder, Ph.D. 12 June 2012 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy OE Transmission Reliability Program Review NASPI Goal: To improve the reliable operation of the North American power system by successfully transitioning synchrophasor technologies from research to industry adoption. 2 Project Objective(s) ORNL's activities in support of NASPI include: * Participate in NASPI Leadership Team * Support Operations Implementation Task Team * Participate in Performance and Standards Task Team * Develop needed metrology capabilities in partnership with NIST.

219

European Meteorological Telecommunications Panel  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... under the auspices of the International Meteorological Organisation, which recently decided to establish a meteorological telecommunications panel under each of its six regional commissions. This was the first meeting of ... meeting of the panel for the European region, and it was attended by meteorologists and telecommunications experts from Belgium, Eire, France, Great Britain, Italy, Netherlands, Norway (also ...

1948-07-24T23:59:59.000Z

220

Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review past procedures used to write, revise, or maintain a Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

CERTS 2012 Program Review - NASPI Leadership and Task Team Technical Support - Jeff Dagle, PNNL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PNNL Support for NASPI PNNL Support for NASPI Jeff Dagle Pacific Northwest National Lab jeff.dagle@pnnl.gov 11/12 June 2012 Washington, DC OE Transmission Reliability Program Review 2 Project Objective(s) To improve the reliable operation of the North American power system by successfully transitioning synchrophasor technologies from research to industry adoption PNNL's activities in support of NASPI include:  Facilitate leadership and planning activities for the NASPI leadership team and work group meetings  Support the NASPI website, mailing lists, and task team administrative support (e.g., conference call scheduling and facilitation) PNNL Activities in Support of NASPI in FY12 (cont.)  Special assignments

222

Index to Nuclear Safety: a technical progress review by chronology, permuted title, and author, Volume 18 (1) through Volume 22 (6)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This index to Nuclear Safety covers articles published in Nuclear Safety, Volume 18, Number 1 (January-February 1977) through Volume 22, Number 6 (November-December 1981). The index is divided into three section: a chronological list of articles (including abstracts), a permuted-title (KWIC) index, and an author index. Nuclear Safety, a bimonthly technical progress review prepared by the Nuclear Safety Information Center, covers all safety aspects of nuclear power reactors and associated facilities. Over 300 technical articles published in Nuclear Safety in the last 5 years are listed in this index.

Cottrell, W.B.; Passiakos, M.

1982-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2010 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production and Delivery Jamie Holladay, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) This award recognizes Jamie Holladay for his outstanding contributions to hydrogen production and delivery. He completed a two-year assignment in July, 2009, with the Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies (FCT)

224

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2011 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production Tom Jaramillo, Stanford University This award recognizes Tom Jaramillo for the invaluable contributions he has made to the program in the field of photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen production. Dr. Jaramillo has been an instrumental driving force in EERE's

225

EuropeanEuropean PanelPanel FederationFederation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EuropeanEuropean PanelPanel FederationFederation viewpointviewpoint onon sustainablesustainable woodwood energyenergy policiespolicies #12;EuropeanEuropean PanelPanel FederationFederation Members energy for manufacturingfor manufacturing ·· Wood products are anWood products are an energy source

226

E-Print Network 3.0 - assessment review methodology Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

agreed that the great- est impediment to producing accurate... assessment re- sults to peer review panels and constituent groups, (ix) participate on peer review panels, (x......

227

Gas filled panel insulation  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A structural or flexible highly insulative panel which may be translucent, is formed from multi-layer polymeric material in the form of an envelope surrounding a baffle. The baffle is designed so as to minimize heat transfer across the panel, by using material which forms substantially closed spaces to suppress convection of the low conductivity gas fill. At least a portion of the baffle carries a low emissivity surface for suppression of infrared radiation.

Griffith, Brent T. (Berkeley, CA); Arasteh, Dariush K. (Oakland, CA); Selkowitz, Stephen E. (Piedmont, CA)

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Gas filled panel insulation  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A structural or flexible highly insulative panel which may be translucent, is formed from multi-layer polymeric material in the form of an envelope surrounding a baffle. The baffle is designed so as to minimize heat transfer across the panel, by using material which forms substantially closed spaces to suppress convection of the low conductivity gas fill. At least a portion of the baffle carries a low emissivity surface for suppression of infrared radiation. 18 figures.

Griffith, B.T.; Arasteh, D.K.; Selkowitz, S.E.

1993-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

229

US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap The Fuel Cell Technical Team (FCTT) conducts the following activities: (1) Reviews and evaluates...

230

Technical Review Report for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Model 9977 S-SARP-G-00001 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Review Report (TRR) summarizes the review findings for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Model 9977 B(M)F-96 shipping container. The content analyzed for this submittal is Content Envelope C.1, Heat Sources, in assemblies of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators or food-pack cans. The SARP under review, i.e., S-SARP-G-00001, Revision 2 (August 2007), was originally referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package. The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's, Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9977 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. The Model 9977 Package design includes a single, 6-inch diameter, stainless steel pressure vessel containment system (i.e., the 6CV) that was designed and fabricated in accordance with Section III, Subsection NB, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. The earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, 9966, 9967 and 9968 Packages, were originally designed and certified in the 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with new safety requirements, based on International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, were proposed. The updated package designs were the Model 9972, 9973, 9974 and 9975 Packages, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. Differences between the Model 9975 Package and the Model 9977 Package include: (1) The lead shield present in the Model 9975 Package is absent in the Model 9977 Package; (2) The Model 9975 Package has eight allowable contents, while the Model 9977 Package has a single allowable content. (3) The 6CV of the Model 9977 Package is similar in design to the outer Containment Vessel of the Model 9975 Package that also incorporates a 5-inch Containment Vessel as the inner Containment Vessel. (4) The Model 9975 Package uses a Celotex{reg_sign}-based impact limiter while the Model 9977 Package uses Last-A-Foam{reg_sign}, a polyurethane foam, for the impact limiter. (5) The Model 9975 Package has two Containment Vessels, while the Model 9977 Package has a single Containment Vessel.

DiSabatino, A; Hafner, R; West, M

2007-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

231

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review: Phase 1 Technical Studies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Since 1964, the Columbia River Treaty has provided signi?cant bene?ts to the United States and Canada through coordinated river management by the two countries. It remains the standard against which other international water coordination agreements around the world are compared. When the Treaty was negotiated, its goals were to provide signi?cant ?ood control and power generation bene?ts to both countries. However, the Treaty contains two provisions that may signi?cantly change these bene?ts as early as the year 2024. First, in 2024 the 60 years of purchased ?ood control space in Canadian Treaty projects expires. Instead of a coordinated and managed plan to regulate both Canadian and U.S. projects for ?ood control, the Treaty calls for a shift to a Canadian operation under which the United States can call upon Canada for ?ood control assistance. The United States can request this called upon assistance as needed but only to the extent necessary to meet forecast ?ood control needs in the United States that cannot adequately be met by U.S. projects. When called upon is requested, the United States will then have to pay Canada for its operational costs and any economic losses resulting from the called upon ?ood control operation. Second, while the Treaty has no speci?ed end date, it does allow either Canada or the United States the option to terminate most of the provisions of the Treaty on or after Sept. 16, 2024, with a minimum of 10 years advance written notice. Thus, the year 2024 is the ?rst year a notice of termination would take effect assuming written notice of termination is given by the Canadian or U.S. governments by 2014. Unless the Treaty is terminated or the federal governments elect to modify the Treaty, its provisions continue inde?nitely, except for the changes in ?ood control discussed above. Given the signi?cance of both of these provisions, it is important that the parties to the Treaty understand the implications for post-2024 Treaty planning and Columbia River operations. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bonneville Power Administration, the agencies that implement the Treaty in the United States on behalf of the U.S. Entity (see Treaty Governance sidebar), are conducting a multi-year effort to understand these implications. This effort is called the 2014/2024 Columbia River Treaty Review.

none,

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

232

2013 Peer Review Report | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Report 2013 Peer Review Report Review Panel Summary Report and Project Results 2013peerreview.pdf More Documents & Publications Algal Biofuels: Long-Term Energy...

233

City and County of Denver - Solar Panel Permitting (Colorado) | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Solar Panel Permitting (Colorado) Solar Panel Permitting (Colorado) City and County of Denver - Solar Panel Permitting (Colorado) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction General Public/Consumer Industrial Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Residential Savings Category Solar Buying & Making Electricity Heating & Cooling Water Heating Program Info State Colorado Program Type Solar/Wind Permitting Standards Provider Department of Development Services Construction, Electrical, Plumbing and Zoning Permits* are required for Photovoltaic (PV) systems installed in the city of Denver. Denver provides same day permit review for most solar panel projects. More complex engineering projects may still be required to go through the Plan Review process. To obtain Zoning Permits for flush mounted solar panels, applicants must

234

SAM Technical Review Committee Final Report: Summary and Key Recommendations from the Onsite TRC Meeting Held April 22-23, 2013  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The System Advisor Model (SAM) is a broad and robust set of models and frameworks for analyzing both system performance and system financing. It does this across a range of technologies dominated by solar technologies including photovoltaics (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP). The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Solar Energy Technology Program requested the SAM development team to review the photovoltaic performance modeling with the development community and specifically, with the independent engineering community. The report summarizes the major effort for this technical review committee (TRC).

Blair, N.; Dobos, S.; Janzou, S.; Gilman, P.; Freeman, J.; Kaffine, L.

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

June 2013, FTCP Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Status Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER STATUS REPORT U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 June 2013 FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL List of Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Positions ORGANIZATION: Office of Environmental Management - Carlsbad Field Office 2 Position Title Incumbent Base Requirements Compensatory Measures Qualification Status Comments Technical Degree Experience Manager Carlsbad Field Office Jose R. Franco Yes Yes No Complete Deputy Manager, Carlsbad Field Office Vacant Director for the Office of Site Operations Donald "Casey" Gadbury Yes Yes No Complete Director for the Office of Environment, Safety and Health/CBFO FTCP Agent George T. Basabilvazo Yes Yes No Complete 3 FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL

236

June 2013, FTCP Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Status Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER STATUS REPORT U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 June 2013 FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL List of Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Positions ORGANIZATION: Office of Environmental Management - Carlsbad Field Office 2 Position Title Incumbent Base Requirements Compensatory Measures Qualification Status Comments Technical Degree Experience Manager Carlsbad Field Office Jose R. Franco Yes Yes No Complete Deputy Manager, Carlsbad Field Office Vacant Director for the Office of Site Operations Donald "Casey" Gadbury Yes Yes No Complete Director for the Office of Environment, Safety and Health/CBFO FTCP Agent George T. Basabilvazo Yes Yes No Complete 3 FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL

237

Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Rosemarie Bartlett,...

238

Independent Oversight Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory, December 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Area 55 Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2

239

Oven wall panel construction  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

An oven roof or wall is formed from modular panels, each of which comprises an inner fabric and an outer fabric. Each such fabric is formed with an angle iron framework and somewhat resilient tie-bars or welded at their ends to flanges of the angle irons to maintain the inner and outer frameworks in spaced disposition while minimizing heat transfer by conduction and permitting some degree of relative movement on expansion and contraction of the module components. Suitable thermal insulation is provided within the module. Panels or skins are secured to the fabric frameworks and each such skin is secured to a framework and projects laterally so as slidingly to overlie the adjacent frame member of an adjacent panel in turn to permit relative movement during expansion and contraction.

Ellison, Kenneth (20 Avondale Cres., Markham, CA); Whike, Alan S. (R.R. #1, Caledon East, both of Ontario, CA)

1980-04-22T23:59:59.000Z

240

Outside Review of the Doctoral Program of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry of Texas Technical University (TTU)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

observed no desire to remain static. There is also a deci- sion-making process in place to support with the internal and external reviewers present and again on February 6 among internal reviewers. The review team

Rock, Chris

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Solar Panels Plus LLC | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Panels Plus LLC Jump to: navigation, search Name: Solar Panels Plus LLC Place: Chesapeake, Virginia Zip: 23320 Sector: Solar Product: Solar Panels Plus LLC distributes solar energy...

242

Spotlight: Schools Expert Panel  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......also covers teacher education and initial teacher...systems used by local education authorities and schools...on current practice. Posters and leaflets on ICT...Panel reports to the BCS Education and Training Forum...Department for Education and Science, the Office for Standards......

Spotlight: Schools Expert Panel

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

JGI - CSP Proposal Study Panel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

User Programs User Programs Project Management Office Community Science Program Emerging Technologies Opportunity Program Technology Development Pilot Program Genomic Encyc. of Bacteria and Archaea MyJGI: Information for Collaborators The CSP Proposal Study Panel CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | Project Management | Forms | FAQ | People and Contacts Members Nina Agabian University of California, San Francisco, http://www.ucsf.edu Chris Amemiya Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, http://www.benaroyaresearch.org Gary L. Andersen Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, http://www.lbl.gov Jo Ann Banks Purdue University, http://www.purdue.edu John Battista Louisiana State University, http://www.lsu.edu Fred Brockman

244

President's panel probes sustainable development  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

President's panel probes sustainable development ... The President's Council on Sustainable Development, a blue-ribbon advisory panel established by President Bill Clinton last June, held its first meeting outside the nation's capital earlier this month in the Seattle. ...

DEBORAH ILLMAN

1994-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

245

May 15, 2012, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting … FTCP FY 2012 Operational Plan Goal 3 Survey: Steering Group/Strategic Interface  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Steering Group/Strategic Interface Steering Group/Strategic Interface FTCP Agents Review and Feedback This paper discusses the how improvement in Strategic Interface and possible development of Steering Committees could assist the Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) in accomplishing the intent of DOE Order 426.1, Federal Technical Capability. The mission of the DOE is to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions. A key goal to this mission is to: Establish an operational and adaptable framework that combines the best wisdom of all Department stakeholders to maximize mission success. The purpose of the Federal Technical Capability Order is to define requirements and

246

Lighting Technology Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technology Panel Technology Panel Federal Utility Partnership Working Group N b 2009 November 1 1 8, 2009 Doug Avery Southern California Edison Southern California Edison National Energy Conservation M d t Mandates * There are Federal and State Mandates to reduce energy consumption - California Investor Owned Electric Utilities are ordered to save around 3 Billion kWh's each y year from 2007-2113 - Federal buildings ordered to reduce electrical Federal buildings ordered to reduce electrical energy consumption 35% by 2012 Energy Consump ption gy Lighting accounts for 42 7% of energy consumption Lighting accounts for 42.7% of energy consumption Data Courtesy of SDG&E Data Courtesy of SDG&E Energy Consump ption gy More than ¾ of the lighting load is non-residential. Data Courtesy of SDG&E

247

Nuclear Materials Focus Area Fiscal Year 2002 Mid Year Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Materials Focus Area (NMFA) held its annual mid-year review on February 12 and 14, 2002, in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The purpose of this review was to examine both the technical aspects and the programmatic aspects of its technology development program. The focus area activities were reviewed by a panel consisting of personnel representing the end users of the technologies, and technical experts in nuclear materials. This year's review was somewhat different than in the past, as the stress was on how well the various projects being managed through the NMFA aligned with the two thrust areas and nine key goals and priorities recently issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for DOE's Office of Environmental Management (EM).

Thiel, E.C.; Fuhrman, P.W.

2002-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

248

Nuclear Materials Focus Area Fiscal Year 2002 Mid Year Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Materials Focus Area (NMFA) held its annual mid-year review on February 12 and 14, 2002, in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The purpose of this review was to examine both the technical aspects and the programmatic aspects of its technology development program. The focus area activities were reviewed by a panel consisting of personnel representing the end users of the technologies, and technical experts in nuclear materials. This year's review was somewhat different than in the past, as the stress was on how well the various projects being managed through the NMFA aligned with the two thrust areas and nine key goals and priorities recently issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for DOE's Office of Environmental Management (EM).

Thiel, Elizabeth Chilcote

2002-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

Fifth parabolic dish solar thermal power program annual review: proceedings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of the Review was to present the results of activities within the Parabolic Dish Technology and Module/Systems Development element of the Department of Energy's Solar Thermal Energy Systems Program. The Review consisted of nine technical sessions covering overall Project and Program aspects, Stirling and Brayton module development, concentrator and engine/receiver development, and associated hardware and test results to date; distributed systems operating experience; international dish development activities; and non-DOE-sponsored domestic dish activities. A panel discussion concerning business views of solar electric generation was held. These Proceedings contain the texts of presentations made at the Review, as submitted by their authors at the beginning of the Review; therefore, they may vary slightly from the actual presentations in the technical sessions.

None

1984-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A consensus peer review of the current technical basis and the planned experimental and modeling program for the prediction of the long-term performance of waste package materials being considered for use in a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Wastepackagematerials_PPRP_final.pdf Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Multi-Purpose_Canister_System_Evaluation.pdf More Documents & Publications Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking/Fatigue Modeling for Light Water

251

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1950 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS R. E. BEARD Statistics...Price 20s. [453 ] REVIEWS Statistics, Volume I...regard to the mathematical standard required by the Institute...distributions.' The general plan of the book is first......

R. E. BEARD

1950-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

Water Power Program: 2011 Peer Review Report | Department of...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Water Power Program: 2011 Peer Review Report Water Power Program: 2011 Peer Review Report This document contains the peer review panel's observations and findings, responses from...

253

Water Power Program: 2010 Peer Review Report | Department of...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Water Power Program: 2010 Peer Review Report Water Power Program: 2010 Peer Review Report This document contains the peer review panel's observations and findings, responses from...

254

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking The Department of Energy assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the appliance energy...

255

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2004 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capalbility Program Federal Technical Capalbility Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 Annual Plan November 20,2003 FTCP Annual Plan. FY 2004 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE P 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE M 426. l-l, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the Program. The FTCP consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities,

256

Savannah River Site- Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This is a presentation outlining the Salt Waste Processing Facility process, major risks, approach for conducting reviews, discussion of the findings, and conclusions.

257

Concentrating photovoltaic solar panel  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

The present invention relates to photovoltaic power systems, photovoltaic concentrator modules, and related methods. In particular, the present invention features concentrator modules having interior points of attachment for an articulating mechanism and/or an articulating mechanism that has a unique arrangement of chassis members so as to isolate bending, etc. from being transferred among the chassis members. The present invention also features adjustable solar panel mounting features and/or mounting features with two or more degrees of freedom. The present invention also features a mechanical fastener for secondary optics in a concentrator module.

Cashion, Steven A; Bowser, Michael R; Farrelly, Mark B; Hines, Braden E; Holmes, Howard C; Johnson, Jr., Richard L; Russell, Richard J; Turk, Michael F

2014-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

258

WIPP_Panel_7_Approved  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Panel 7 Certified and Ready for Waste Disposal Panel 7 Certified and Ready for Waste Disposal CARLSBAD, N.M., August 1, 2013 - In mid-July 2013, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) approved the use of Panel 7 for disposal of defense- related transuranic (TRU) waste at the Department of Energy (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Approval by NMED for each underground waste disposal panel prior to use is required under the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (Permit). A panel consists of seven waste disposal rooms and each room is approximately 13 feet high, 33 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mining and outfitting, which includes installation of electricity, monitoring equipment and air regulating bulkheads, of a panel takes about two to two and a half years. Once the mining and outfitting are completed,

259

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change About the Lab Our Vision Lab Leadership History Nobelists Visit Navigate Section About the Lab Our Vision Lab Leadership History...

260

Thermal insulations using vacuum panels  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

Thermal insulation vacuum panels are formed of an inner core of compressed low thermal conductivity powders enclosed by a ceramic/glass envelope evaluated to a low pressure.

Glicksman, Leon R. (Lynnfield, MA); Burke, Melissa S. (Pittsburgh, PA)

1991-07-16T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers: Serve as the DOE element representatives to STIP and ensure that STI objectives and requirements are incorporated into strategic planning, management information plans, life-cycle procedures from project initiation to close-out, and contract language as appropriate. Coordinate with contractor STI managers and have adequate familiarity with STI activities to discern contractor compliance with the CRD portion of this directive. Coordinate the implementation of appropriate review and release procedures by DOE elements, DOE contractors, and financial assistance recipients as appropriate. Serve as Releasing Officials or coordinate designation and official

262

Hanford ETR Bulk Vitrification System - Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS) Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A Comprehensive Technical A Comprehensive Technical Review of the Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System Technical Assessment Conducted by an Independent and External Team of Experts Volume 1 September 28, 2006 Chartered by CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. Richland, Washington 99352 RPP-31314 Executive Summary In May 2006, CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. chartered an Expert Review Panel (ERP) to review the current status of the Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS). It is the consensus of the ERP that bulk vitrification is a technology that requires further development and evaluation to determine its potential for meeting the Hanford waste stabilization mission. No fatal flaws (issues that would jeopardize the overall DBVS mission that cannot be mitigated) were found, given the current state of the project.

263

Safety and Technical Services  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety and Technical Services Safety and Technical Services Minimize The Safety and Technical Services (STS) organization is a component of the Office of Science's (SC's) Oak Ridge Integrated Support Center. The mission of STS is to provide excellent environmental, safety, health, quality, and engineering support to SC laboratories and other U.S. Department of Energy program offices. STS maintains a full range of technically qualified Subject Matter Experts, all of whom are associated with the Technical Qualifications Program. Examples of the services that we provide include: Integrated Safety Management Quality Assurance Planning and Metrics Document Review Tracking and trending analysis and reporting Assessments, Reviews, Surveillances and Inspections Safety Basis Support SharePoint/Dashboard Development for Safety Programs

264

Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1400_Panel PMCDP CRB Panel slides final March 4 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Development Program (PMCDP) Peter O'Konski PE, PMP, CCE Facility Policy & Professional Development Office of Engineering and Construction Management Agenda g * Update on the PMCDP Program - Key program updates - Maturing of the program - Challenges - Current statistics Website - Website * Certification Review Board Panel Discussion * Certification Review Board Panel Discussion 3/16/2011 2 Key Program Updates * Process changes * Process changes - Virtual voting for Level 1 and 2 candidates - Reference checks for Level 3 and 4 candidates * Curriculum updates - Changes to PMP® waivers - Course updates - Continuous improvement * Expect to remain static for next 1-2 years p y * Administration - Website updated 3 3/16/2011 Maturing of the Program Maturing of the Program aka: Leadership Matters * Project success is the ultimate goal

265

Requested Information Provided by the Three Major United States Toroidal Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Report of the 2005 FESAC Facilities Panel, Vol. 2  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This is Volume 2 of a report of a panel established by the U.S. Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) charged to review the three major U.S. fusion facilities. The Panel requested...

Jill Dahlburg; Steven L. Allen; Riccardo Betti

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

SRTC criticality safety technical review: Phase 1 criticality analysis for the 9972-9975 family of shipping casks: (SRT-CMA-940003)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Review of SRT-CMA-940003, ``Phase I Criticality Analysis For The 9972-9975 Family Of Shipping Casks (U). (SRT-CMA-940003).`` January 22, 1994, has been performed by the SRTC Applied Physics Group. The NCSE is a criticality assessment of the 9972-9975 family of shipping casks. This work is a follow-on of a previous criticality safety evaluation, with the differences between this and the previous evaluation are that now wall tolerances are modeled and more sophisticated analytical methods are applied. The NCSE under review concludes that, with one exception, the previously specified plutonium and uranium mass limits for 9972-9975 family of shipping casks do ensure that WSRC Nuclear Criticality Safety Manual requirements (ref. 1) are satisfied. The one exception is that the plutonium mass limit for the 9974 cask had to be reduced from 4.4 to 4.3 kg. In contrast, the 7.5 kg uranium mass limit for the 9974 cask was raised to 14.5 kg, making the uranium mass identical for all casks in this family. This technical review consisted of an independent check of the methods and models employed, application of ANSI/ANS 8.1 and 8.15, and verification of WSRC Nuclear Criticality Safety Manual procedures.

Rathbun, R.

1994-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

267

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2002 Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

S. Department of Energy S. Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Panel FY 2002 Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy on the Status of Federal Technical Capability Related to the Safe Operation of Defense Nuclear Facilities Washington, D.C. 20585 JUNE 1, 2001 to MAY 31, 2002 FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATUS OF FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY RELATED TO THE SAFE OPERATIONS OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES This is the fourth Annual Report issued by the Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP). This report covers the period from June 1, 2001, to May 31, 2002, and summarizes the status of the federal technical capability program in the Department. It identifies accomplishments, issues, and recommendations as appropriate.

268

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1959 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS E. S. PEARSON The Advanced...433 . 84s. [491 ] REVIEWS The Advanced Theory of...the same comprehensive standard, three volumes will...inserted in the original plan at this half-way stage......

E. S. PEARSON

1959-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review Reviews Reviews Factors for One-sided...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...Pp. 412 . 5.00. Reviews 293 Handbook of Nonparametric...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...expected value ft and standard deviation cr/^/n......

Reviews

1964-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance The Technical Assistance program is managed through the Center for Sustainable Soil and Groundwater Solutions at SRNL. The Technical Assistance program provides teams of nationally recognized experts from across the complex to support both DOE's smaller sites, such as Paducah, Portsmouth, Pinellas, Ashtabula, Fernald, Mound and Kansas City Plant, and larger sites such as Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Savannah River. Solutions that reduce technical risk and uncertainty Focus on science and engineering issues and strategic implementation of remedial systems Independent reviews facilitate regulatory and stakeholder acceptance of solutions. Contacts Karen Skubal karen.skubal@em.doe.gov (301) 903-6524 Justin Marble

271

Plane and parabolic solar panels  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We present a plane and parabolic collector that absorbs radiant energy and transforms it in heat. Therefore we have a panel to heat water. We study how to increment this capture of solar beams onto the panel in order to increase its efficiency in heating water.

Sales, J H O

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Plane and parabolic solar panels  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We present a plane and parabolic collector that absorbs radiant energy and transforms it in heat. Therefore we have a panel to heat water. We study how to increment this capture of solar beams onto the panel in order to increase its efficiency in heating water.

J. H. O. Sales; A. T. Suzuki

2009-05-14T23:59:59.000Z

273

Evaluation of the Technical Basis for Extended Dry Storage and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-- Executive Summary U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board December 2010 #12;U.S.U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Authors This report was prepared for the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.NWTRB.GOV ii #12;Extended Dry Storage and Transportation of Used Nuclear Fuel U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical

274

CERTS 2012 Program Review - NASPI Technical Support for OITT & Operations of NERC-TVA NASPI Synchrophasor Network & RTDMS Installation - Jim Dyer, EPG  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SynchroPhasor Initiative SynchroPhasor Initiative (NASPI) Event Analysis Reports Jim Dyer dyer@ElectricPowerGroup.com June 12, 2012 Washington, DC DOE - CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review Agenda  Technical Support for Operations of Real Time Dynamics Monitoring System (RTDMS) for NASPI  Support of the RTDMS Users' Group  Support of NASPI Operations Implementation Task Team (OITT) Page 1  Built upon GRID-3P Platform, U.S. Patent 7,233,843, and U.S. Patent 8,060259. All rights reserved. NASPI-RTDMS Support Page 2  Objective - Enhance, maintain and support the RTDMS application, server, data base and client. Support users needs and provide an application that converts phasor date into useful information

275

Hydrogen Station Compression, Storage, and Dispensing Technical Status and Costs: Systems Integration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the request of the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO), the National Renewable Energy Laboratory commissioned an independent review of hydrogen compression, storage, and dispensing (CSD) for pipeline delivery of hydrogen and forecourt hydrogen production. The panel was asked to address the (1) cost calculation methodology, (2) current cost/technical status, (3) feasibility of achieving the FCTO's 2020 CSD levelized cost targets, and to (4) suggest research areas that will help the FCTO reach its targets. As the panel neared the completion of these tasks, it was also asked to evaluate CSD costs for the delivery of hydrogen by high-pressure tube trailer. This report details these findings.

Parks, G.; Boyd, R.; Cornish, J.; Remick, R.

2014-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Water Power: 2009 Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document represents the 2009 Water Power Peer Review Panels observations and findings, response from the Water Program to these findings, and supporting meeting materials including an agenda and participants list.

277

Panelized wall system with foam core insulation  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A wall system includes a plurality of wall members, the wall members having a first metal panel, a second metal panel, and an insulating core between the first panel and the second panel. At least one of the first panel and the second panel include ridge portions. The insulating core can be a foam, such as a polyurethane foam. The foam can include at least one opacifier to improve the k-factor of the foam.

Kosny, Jan (Oak Ridge, TN); Gaskin, Sally (Houston, TX)

2009-10-20T23:59:59.000Z

278

DOE-DARPA High-Performance Corrosion-Resistant Materials (HPCRM), Annual HPCRM Team Meeting & Technical Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The overall goal is to develop high-performance corrosion-resistant iron-based amorphous-metal coatings for prolonged trouble-free use in very aggressive environments: seawater & hot geothermal brines. The specific technical objectives are: (1) Synthesize Fe-based amorphous-metal coating with corrosion resistance comparable/superior to Ni-based Alloy C-22; (2) Establish processing parameter windows for applying and controlling coating attributes (porosity, density, bonding); (3) Assess possible cost savings through substitution of Fe-based material for more expensive Ni-based Alloy C-22; (4) Demonstrate practical fabrication processes; (5) Produce quality materials and data with complete traceability for nuclear applications; and (6) Develop, validate and calibrate computational models to enable life prediction and process design.

Farmer, J; Brown, B; Bayles, B; Lemieux, T; Choi, J; Ajdelsztajn, L; Dannenberg, J; Lavernia, E; Schoenung, J; Branagan, D; Blue, C; Peter, B; Beardsley, B; Graeve, O; Aprigliano, L; Yang, N; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Boudreau, J

2007-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

279

Technical Articles  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Articles science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Technical Articles National security depends on science and technology. The United States relies on Los...

280

Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Structural Insulated Panels...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Structural Insulated Panels Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Structural Insulated Panels September 20, 2011 - 7:13am Addthis These...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

2011 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE TECHNICAL EXCHANGE - SUMMARY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Performance Assessment Community of Practice (PA CoP) was developed in 2008 to improve consistency and quality in the preparation of performance assessments (PAs) and risk assessments across the Department of Energy (DOE) Complex. The term, PA, is used to represent all of these modeling applications in this report. The PA CoP goals are to foster the exchange of information among PA practitioners and to share lessons learned from PAs conducted for DOE, commercial disposal facilities, and international entities. Technical exchanges and workshops are a cornerstone of PA CoP activities. Previous technical exchanges have addressed Engineered Barriers (2009 - http://www.cresp.org/education/workshops/pacop/), the Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management and the Cementitious Barriers Partnership (2010 - http://srnl.doe.gov/copexchange/links.htm). Each technical exchange also includes summary presentations regarding activities at DOE, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other organizations (e.g., International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)) as well as a number of presentations from selected sites to provide insight and perspective from on-going modeling activities. Through the deployment of PA Assistance Teams, the PA CoP has also been engaged in the development of new PAs across the DOE Complex. As a way of improving consistency in the preparation of new PAs, the teams provide technical advice and share experiences, noteworthy practices, and lessons learned from previous Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) reviews. Teams have provided support for PAs at Hanford, Idaho, Paducah and Portsmouth. The third annual PA CoP Technical Exchange was held on May 25-26, 2011 in Atlanta, GA. The PA CoP Steering Committee Meeting held its first meeting on May 24 prior to the Technical Exchange. Decision making using models and software quality assurance were the topical emphasis for the exchange. A new feature at the 2011 technical exchange was the use of panel discussions to solicit feedback from regulators and practitioners. This report summarizes discussions and recommendations from the steering committee meeting and presentations and feedback obtained at the technical exchange. Appendix I includes the steering committee meeting agenda and Appendix II includes the agenda for the technical exchange and a screenshot of the presentations and video files that are available online.

Seitz, R.

2011-12-30T23:59:59.000Z

282

FTCP Issues Paper - Technical Qualification Program Requalification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Qualification Program Requalification Technical Qualification Program Requalification DOCUMENT NUMBER: FTCP-08-002 PROBLEM (Issue or Position): At the request of the Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) Chairperson, a team was assembled to develop a set of objective criteria to be used to assess whether positions assigned a Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) should be required to periodically requalify. This paper examines two objectives regarding requalification for Federal employees under the FTCP as follows: (1) Defining what criteria can be used to assess whether positions assigned a TQP FAQS should be required to periodically requalify; and (2) Recommended implementation mechanisms for the frequency/periodicity for

283

One Panel One Roof, DOE Powering Solar Workforce | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

One Panel One Roof, DOE Powering Solar Workforce One Panel One Roof, DOE Powering Solar Workforce...

284

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification"  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification" Date: November 6, 2000 for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy Reviewed: Technical Evaluation Report Approved: "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Center for Astrophysics & Space Astronomy Revision A Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT

Colorado at Boulder, University of

285

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular Applications October 30, 2006 .....................................................................................................................................................................8 APPENDIX A: Review of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Systems ......................................................................................18 APPENDIX C: Presentation to the FreedomCAR & Fuel Hydrogen Storage Technical Team

286

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2005 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Annual Plan January 15, 2005 FTCP Annual Plan, FY 2005 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the U.S. Department of Energy (also known as the "Department" or DOE) missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE Manual (M) 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the

287

Technical Review Report for the Model 9977 Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Addendum 1 Justification for DNDO Contents  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Model 9977 Package is currently certified for Content Envelope C.1, {sup 238}Pu Heat Sources, either in Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG), or in Food-Pack Can configurations, under Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Certificate Number 9977 and Package Identification Number USA/9977/B(M)F-96 (DOE). Addendum 1, Justification for DNDO Contents,--the Submittal--supplements Revision 2 of the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging for the Model 9977 Package. The Submittal adds five new contents to the Model 9977 Package, Content Envelopes, AC.1 through AC.5. The Content Envelopes are neptunium metal, the beryllium-reflected plutonium ball (BeRP Ball), plutonium/uranium metal, plutonium/uranium metal with enhanced wt% {sup 240}Pu (to 50 wt%), and uranium metal. The last three Content Envelopes are stabilized to DOE-STD-3013. These Content Envelopes will be shipped to the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), where they will reside, and, hence, to off-site locations in support of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO). The new certificate will apply to a limited number of Model 9977 Packages. At the same time, the Submittal requests an extension of the periodic maintenance requirements from one (1) year to up to five (5) years using Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) temperature-monitoring systems to measure the ambient storage temperature in order to ensure that the temperature of the Viton{reg_sign} O-rings for the 6-inch Containment Vessel (6CV) remain less than 200 F. The RFIDs have been developed by Argonne National Laboratory. An on-going surveillance program at the K-Area Materials Storage (KAMS) facility at the Savannah River Site, and an on-going examination of Viton{reg_sign} O-rings from mock Primary Containment Vessels (PCVs) at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) provide the technical justification for the extension of the periodic maintenance interval. Where extended periodic maintenance is desired, the decay heat rate for the Model 9977 Package is limited to 15 watts.

West, M H

2008-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

288

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......of organizing computations (though he does not discuss the product form of the inverse...theory. It reads with the drynesa of a handbook. This does not detract from Reviews 479 ita value; as a handbook it is excellent and the reviewer has no......

J. G. SAW

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Technical considerations for evaluating substantially complete containment of high-level waste within the waste package  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report deals with technical information that is considered essential for demonstrating the ability of the high-level radioactive waste package to provide substantially complete containment'' of its contents (vitrified waste form or spent light-water reactor fuel) for a period of 300 to 1000 years in a geological repository environment. The discussion is centered around technical considerations of the repository environment, materials and fabrication processes for the waste package components, various degradation modes of the materials of construction of the waste packages, and inspection and monitoring of the waste package during the preclosure and retrievability period, which could begin up to 50 years after initiation of waste emplacement. The emphasis in this report is on metallic materials. However, brief references have been made to other materials such as ceramics, graphite, bonded ceramic-metal systems, and other types of composites. The content of this report was presented to an external peer review panel of nine members at a workshop held at the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses (CNWRA), Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, April 2--4, 1990. The recommendations of the peer review panel have been incorporated in this report. There are two companion reports; the second report in the series provides state-of-the-art techniques for uncertainty evaluations. 97 refs., 1 fig.

Manaktala, H.K. (Southwest Research Inst., San Antonio, TX (USA). Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses); Interrante, C.G. (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (USA). Div. of High-Level Waste Management)

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

FEMP Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FEMP Peer Review FEMP Peer Review Report summarizes the findings of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review Panel conducted over a three-day period in September 2005....

291

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......continuity management standards: the earlier British standard BS 25999 and the international...requirements of the latter standard. The fourth part of...Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information...first three chapters review the threat landscape......

Project Management for IT-related Projects (Second Edition) ? M & A Integration: How to do it ? Pegasus: The Seminal Early Computer ? The Computer Incident Response Planning Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information at Risk ? Interop The Promise; Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems ? Business continuity management systems

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

REVIEW:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Computers Reviewers, 2011 Stefan Agamanolis, United Kingdom Rosa Alarcon, Chile Frances Aldrich, United Kingdom Jason Alexander, United Kingdom Norman Alm, United Kingdom Analia Amandi, Argentina Chee Siang Ang, United Kingdom Alissa Antle......

Reviewers; Editors Appreciation 2011

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

Technical Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Technical Guidance, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security develops and issues Government-wide and Department-wide technical guidance to ensure that classified nuclear...

294

Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: Current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Desalination capacity has rapidly increased in the last decade because of the increase in water demand and a significant reduction in desalination cost as a result of significant technological advances, especially in the reverse osmosis process. The cost of desalinated seawater has fallen below US$0.50/m3 for a large scale seawater reverse osmosis plant at a specific location and conditions while in other locations the cost is 50% higher (US$1.00/m3) for a similar facility. In addition to capital and operating costs, other parameters such as local incentives or subsidies may also contribute to the large difference in desalted water cost between regions and facilities. Plant suppliers and consultants have their own cost calculation methodologies, but they are confidential and provide water costs with different accuracies. The few existing costing methodologies and software packages such as WTCost and DEEP provide an estimated cost with different accuracies and their applications are limited to specific conditions. Most of the available cost estimation tools are of the black box type, which provide few details concerning the parameters and methodologies applied for local conditions. Many desalination plants built recently have greater desalinated water delivery costs caused by special circumstances, such as plant remediation or upgrades, local variation in energy costs, and site-specific issues in raw materials costs (e.g., tariffs and transportation). Therefore, the availability of a more transparent and unique methodology for estimating the cost will help in selecting an appropriate desalination technology suitable for specific locations with consideration of all the parameters influencing the cost. A techno-economic evaluation and review of the costing aspects and the main parameters influencing the total water cost produced by different desalination technologies are herein presented in detail. Some recent developments, such as the increase of unit capacity, improvements in process design and materials, and the use of hybrid systems have contributed to cost reduction as well as reduction in energy consumption. The development of new and emerging low-energy desalination technologies, such as adsorption desalination, will have an impact on cost variation estimation in the future.

Noreddine Ghaffour; Thomas M. Missimer; Gary L. Amy

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Enclosure 3 Independent External Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Enclosure 3 Summary of Independent External Peer Review Final Panel Comments November 5, 2010 #12 5, 2010 Summary of Independent External Peer Review Final Panel Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Type I independent external peer reviews (IEPRs) assess the economic, engineering, and environmental aspects

US Army Corps of Engineers

296

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by............................................................................................................................................ 1 SELECTION OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS .............................................................................................................................. 2 TECHNICAL EXPERTISE OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS

297

Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Structural Insulated Panels |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Structural Insulated Panels Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Structural Insulated Panels Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Structural Insulated Panels September 20, 2011 - 7:13am Addthis These structural insulated panels consist of foam insulation sandwiched between oriented strand boards. (Courtesy of Michael Bacchler) These structural insulated panels consist of foam insulation sandwiched between oriented strand boards. (Courtesy of Michael Bacchler) Alexis Powers EDITOR'S NOTE: Originally posted on the Solar Decathlon News Blog on September 19, 2011. Editor's Note: This post is one of a series of technology spotlights that introduces common technologies used in U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon team houses. Structural insulated panels (SIPs) are prefabricated structural elements

298

Technical Review Report for the Model 9978-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00002, Revision 1, March 2009)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE), on the 'Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), Model 9978 B(M)F-96', Revision 1, March 2009 (S-SARP-G-00002). The Model 9978 Package complies with 10 CFR 71, and with 'Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material-1996 Edition (As Amended, 2000)-Safety Requirements', International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9978 Packaging is designed, analyzed, fabricated, and tested in accordance with Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&PVC). The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the DOE's 'Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages'. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., 'Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material'. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9978 Packaging is a single containment package, using a 5-inch containment vessel (5CV). It uses a nominal 35-gallon drum package design. In comparison, the Model 9977 Packaging uses a 6-inch containment vessel (6CV). The Model 9977 and Model 9978 Packagings were developed concurrently, and they were referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package, Version 1 (GPFP). Both packagings use General Plastics FR-3716 polyurethane foam as insulation and as impact limiters. The 5CV is used as the Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) in the Model 9975-96 Packaging. The Model 9975-96 Packaging also has the 6CV as its Secondary Containment Vessel (SCV). In comparison, the Model 9975 Packagings use Celotex{trademark} for insulation and as impact limiters. To provide a historical perspective, it is noted that the Model 9975-96 Packaging is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then-newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The Model 9978 Package has six Content Envelopes: C.1 ({sup 238}Pu Heat Sources), C.2 ( Pu/U Metals), C.3 (Pu/U Oxides, Reserved), C.4 (U Metal or Alloy), C.5 (U Compounds), and C.6 (Samples and Sources). Per 10 CFR 71.59 (Code of Federal Regulations), the value of N is 50 for the Model 9978 Package leading to a Criticality Safety Index (CSI) of 1.0. The Transport Index (TI), based on dose rate, is calculated to be a maximum of 4.1.

West, M

2009-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

299

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) Print E-mail Introduction The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX)of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the solicitation of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. The Global Change Research Program Office will coordinate collation of U.S. expert comments and the review of the report by panels of Federal scientists and program managers in order to develop a consolidated U.S. Government submission. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 7 March 2011 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

300

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) Print E-mail Introduction The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, thethe U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the solicitation of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. The Global Change Research Program Office will coordinate collation of U.S. expert comments and the review of the report by panels of Federal scientists and program managers in order to develop a consolidated U.S. Government submission. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 7 March 2011 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Review of technical documents supporting proposed revisions to EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(D) of the Clean Water Act. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In August 1985 the Environmental Engineering Committee of the Science Advisory Board was asked by the Office of Water Regulations and Standards (OWRS) to review technical documents supporting development of EPA regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act. The Committee was also asked by the Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (OMEP) to review technical documents supporting revisions of the EPA ocean dumping regulations. The Committee chose to review the two sets of documents together, since they both dealt with a common subject, and since they shared, in some respects, a common methodology. The report, however, covers only the review of the OWRS documents, which consist of a set of risk-assessment methodologies (1,2,3,4) for four sludge disposal/reuse options (landfilling, land application/distribution and marketing, incineration, and ocean disposal). The reviews of the OMEP documents are covered in separate Committee reports. The Committee's principal findings are outlined.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

DOE-STD-1146-2001; General Technical Base Qualification Standard DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

46-2001 46-2001 October 2001 DOE STANDARD GENERAL TECHNICAL BASE QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1146-2001 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior Department of Energy managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible

303

Peg supported thermal insulation panel  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A thermal insulation panel which is lightweight, load bearing, accommodates thermal stress, and has excellent high temperature insulation capability comprises high performance insulation between thin metal walls supported by high density, high strength glass pegs made in compliance with specified conditions of time, temperature and pressure. 2 figs.

Nowobilski, J.J.; Owens, W.J.

1985-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

304

Peg supported thermal insulation panel  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A thermal insulation panel which is lightweight, load bearing, accommodates thermal stress, and has excellent high temperature insulation capability comprising high performance insulation between thin metal walls supported by high density, high strength glass pegs made in compliance with specified conditions of time, temperature and pressure.

Nowobilski, Jeffert J. (Orchard Park, NY); Owens, William J. (Kenmore, NY)

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Geothermal Technologies Program Blue Ribbon Panel Recommendations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report describes the recommendations of the Geothermal Blue Ribbon Panel, a panel of geothermal experts assembled in March 2011 for a discussion on the future of geothermal energy in the U.S.

306

Inside the White House: Solar Panels  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Go inside the White House and learn about the installation of solar panels on the roof of the residence.

307

Independent External Peer Review Report ACT River Basin 2 July 2013 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ ACT River Basin 2 July 2013 ii Table of Contents List of Panel 6 3.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 7 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Panel Consensus 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ ACT River Basin 2 July 2013 iii List of Tables Table

US Army Corps of Engineers

308

European Panel FederationEuropean Panel Federation viewpoint on wood energy policiesviewpoint on wood energy policies  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

European Panel FederationEuropean Panel Federation viewpoint on wood energy policiesviewpoint on wood energy policies Eva JanssensEva Janssens (Economic Adviser)(Economic Adviser) #12;European Panel FederationEuropean Panel Federation Members in 23 countriesMembers in 23 countries Particleboard 32.1 million

309

Sandia Combustion Research: Technical review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report contains reports from research programs conducted at the Sandia Combustion Research Facility. Research is presented under the following topics: laser based diagnostics; combustion chemistry; reacting flow; combustion in engines and commercial burners; coal combustion; and industrial processing. Individual projects were processed separately for entry onto the DOE databases.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

Technical information  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Home> Commercial Buildings Home> Technical Information > Estimation of Standard Errors Estimation of Standard Errors Sampling error is the difference between the survey estimate...

311

Technical Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Dec 12, 2013 ... Technical Report Series: DCC-2013-13. Departamento de Cincia de Computadores. Faculdade de Cincias da Universidade do Porto.

Filipe Brandao

2013-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

312

Peer Review Summary Document (February 8, 2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (February 8, 2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Names and biographies of the six peer reviewers are available in Appendix A of the report titled: Peer Review Panel Report on Draft Klamath Dam Removal Overview Report

Torgersen, Christian

313

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory December 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory

314

Enterprise Assessments Review, West Valley Demonstration Project December 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness

315

Empowering the Next Generation: Connecting the U.S. and African Nations through Technical Exchanges  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

At the May 2014 U.S.-Africa Energy Ministerial in Ethiopia Director Dot Harris moderated a panel focused on creating innovative partnerships and technical exchanges between American and African universities and businesses to address energy and development challenges.

316

Peer Review Summary Document (05/29/2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (05/29/2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, Ted Sommer, Kelly Souza, and Erwin Van Nieuwenhuyse. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Review was by a 6-member Panel (Reviewers 1-6 below) and one additional reviewer (Reviewer #7 below). · Peer

Torgersen, Christian

317

Department of Energy Technical Standards Program | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Technical Standards Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Department of Energy Technical Standards Program The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE. Online Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Archive Monthly Status Reports Subscribe RSS logo Subscribe to receive the latest DOE Approved Technical Standards via an RSS feed. Take Action Write, revise, or maintain a DOE Technical Standard Review a DOE Technical Standard at RevCom for TSP Additional Information Technical Standards Program Information

318

Review of the Renewable Energy Target  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Review of the Renewable Energy Target Response to Expert Panel's Call for Submissions Paper #12;NSW Government Submission to the Review of the Renewable Energy Target, May 2014 2/20 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY IN NSW

Peters, Richard

319

Solar Panels … A Life Story  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PLAN PLAN Solar Panels: A Life Story Grade Level: 7-9 Subjects: Science & Economics Length: 3-4 Class Periods Solar Panels - A Life Story INTRODUCTION As solar power gains popularity, solar panels are quickly becoming a part of everyday life. However, the public knows surprisingly little about these energy sources. Where do solar panels come from? How do they work? How much do they really cost? This lesson plan will guide students toward answers by exploring the many factors that influence how solar panels are manufactured. LESSON OVERVIEW Grade Level & Subject: 7 - 9, Science and Economics Length: 3 - 4 class periods Objectives: After completing this lesson, students will be able to:  Identify the raw materials that comprise a solar (photovoltaic, or PV) panel, where

320

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS STUDY RESULTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to review technical specifications for emergency diesel generators in the context of new information developed in the Nuclear Plant Aging Research Program and the application of current NRC regulatory concepts and knowledge. Aging and reliability relationships related to the standard technical specifications are reviewed and supported by data and published information to ensure that conservative and beneficial specifications are identified. Where technical specifications could adversely influence aging and reliability, the technical issues and reasonable alternatives are identified for consideration. This report documents and spans the technical progress from the published and approved regulatory documents to the current knowledge basis. This ensures that the technical bases for the technical specifications discussed are documented and relatively complete subject information is contained in one document. The Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) has participated in the Nuclear Plant Aging Research (NPAR) Program directed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Division of Engineering. The NPAR study of emergency diesel generator aging was performed in two phases. In Phase I, plant operating experience, ~ata, expert opinion and statistical methods were used to produce a new data base related to aging, reliability, and operational readiness of nuclear service diesel generators. Phase II was chiefly concerned with aging mitigation measures.

Hoopingarner, K. R.

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Integrated Solar Panel Antennas for Cube Satellites.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??This thesis work presents an innovative solution for small satellite antennas by integrating slot antennas and solar cells on the same panel to save small (more)

Mahmoud, Mahmoud N.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This is a report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit of the Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy.

324

Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support (TNPS), Nonproliferation and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support (TNPS) Nonproliferation & National Security (NPNS) Overview Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support Strategic Trade Control Review of export license applications Multilateral Export Control Arrangements Interdiction Engagement & Training INECP INSEP GIPP Safeguards Concepts and Approaches Human Capital Development Additional Protocol Technical Assistance National Security Systems & Assessments National Security Information Systems Vulnerability Assessment Team (VAT) Radiation Detection & Response (RDR) Contact NPNS Other Major Programs Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE Division on Flickr Nonproliferation and National Security Program Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support (TNPS)

325

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Infrastructure | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Infrastructure 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Infrastructure This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of...

326

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Sustainability | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sustainability 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Sustainability "This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of...

327

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Feedstock | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Feedstock 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Feedstock This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at...

328

Expert Panel: Forecast Future Demand for Medical Isotopes  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Expert Panel: Expert Panel: Forecast Future Demand for Medical Isotopes March 1999 Expert Panel: Forecast Future Demand for Medical Isotopes September 25-26, 1998 Arlington, Virginia The Expert Panel ............................................................................................. Page 1 Charge To The Expert Panel........................................................................... Page 2 Executive Summary......................................................................................... Page 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................... Page 4 Rationale.......................................................................................................... Page 6 Economic Analysis...........................................................................................

329

Microsoft PowerPoint - AWMA2006_Hg Panel_FEELEY.ppt  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

A&WMA's A&WMA's 99 th Annual Conference & Exhibition Hg Control Technology Panel June 23, 2006 New Orleans, Louisiana Thomas J. Feeley, III thomas.feeley@netl.doe.gov National Energy Technology Laboratory AWMA2006_Hg Panel_FEELEY Outline * Background * Phase II project update/Phase III project descriptions * BOP and related technical issues * Preliminary economic assessment * Byproduct-Hg issues/potential economic impacts * Conclusion AWMA2006_Hg Panel_FEELEY Mercury Control Technology Program Performance/Cost Objectives * Have technologies ready for commercial demonstration by: * 2007 that can reduce "uncontrolled" Hg emissions by 50-70% * 2010 for all coals that can reduce "uncontrolled" Hg emissions by +90% * Reduce cost by 25-50% compared to baseline cost

330

Laser illuminated flat panel display  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A 10 inch laser illuminated flat panel Planar Optic Display (POD) screen has been constructed and tested. This POD screen technology is an entirely new concept in display technology. Although the initial display is flat and made of glass, this technology lends itself to applications where a plastic display might be wrapped around the viewer. The display screen is comprised of hundreds of planar optical waveguides where each glass waveguide represents a vertical line of resolution. A black cladding layer, having a lower index of refraction, is placed between each waveguide layer. Since the cladding makes the screen surface black, the contrast is high. The prototype display is 9 inches wide by 5 inches high and approximately I inch thick. A 3 milliwatt HeNe laser is used as the illumination source and a vector scanning technique is employed.

Veligdan, J.T.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

331

Kingspan Insulated Panels: Order (2013-CE-5353)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE ordered Kingspan Insulated Panels, Inc. to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding Kingspan Insulated Panels had failed to certify that any basic models of walk-in cooler and freezer components comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

332

Thin film photovoltaic panel and method  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A thin film photovoltaic panel includes a backcap for protecting the active components of the photovoltaic cells from adverse environmental elements. A spacing between the backcap and a top electrode layer is preferably filled with a desiccant to further reduce water vapor contamination of the environment surrounding the photovoltaic cells. The contamination of the spacing between the backcap and the cells may be further reduced by passing a selected gas through the spacing subsequent to sealing the backcap to the base of the photovoltaic panels, and once purged this spacing may be filled with an inert gas. The techniques of the present invention are preferably applied to thin film photovoltaic panels each formed from a plurality of photovoltaic cells arranged on a vitreous substrate. The stability of photovoltaic conversion efficiency remains relatively high during the life of the photovoltaic panel, and the cost of manufacturing highly efficient panels with such improved stability is significantly reduced.

Ackerman, Bruce (El Paso, TX); Albright, Scot P. (El Paso, TX); Jordan, John F. (El Paso, TX)

1991-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

333

Review of the Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Proect, July 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Long Lead Procurement Processes Used by Long Lead Procurement Processes Used by Babcock &Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 July 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1

334

Effects of solar photovoltaic panels on roof heat transfer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

theundersideofthetiltedsolarpanelsandthesurfaceoftheroofunderthesolarpanel(Fig. 2). Anairtemperatureofthe solarpanelissimilartotheroof

Dominguez, Anthony; Kleissl, Jan; Luvall, Jeffrey C

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8 8 Varnish cache server Browse Upload data GDR 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142279738 Varnish cache server Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials Dataset Summary Description Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of MaterialsGuidance on materials selection for hydrogen service is needed to support the deployment of hydrogen as a fuel as well as the development of codes and standards for stationary hydrogen use, hydrogen vehicles, refueling stations, and hydrogen transportation. Materials property measurement is needed on deformation, fracture and fatigue of metals in environments relevant to this hydrogen economy infrastructure. The identification of hydrogen-affected material properties such as strength, fracture resistance and fatigue resistance are high priorities to ensure the safe design of load-bearing structures.To support the needs of the hydrogen community, Sandia National Laboratories is conducting an extensive review of reports and journal publications to gather existing materials data for inclusion in the Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials. Additionally, Sandia is working internationally with collaborators to acquire newly generated data for inclusion in the Technical Reference. SAND2012-7321 is an archival report issued by Sandia National Laboratories representing the reference information compiled as of September 2012. Updates and additions of individual sections of this report are available at http://www.sandia.gov/matlsTechRef.Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of MaterialsThe Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials is intended to be a complement to the Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials. Although still in the development stage, the Technical Database will provide a repository of technical data measured in hydrogen and is meant to be an engineering tool to aid the selection of materials for use in hydrogen.

336

Measurement of technical and allocative efficiencies using a CES cost frontier: a benchmarking study of Japanese transmission-distribution electricity  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper estimates the technical and allocative inefficiencies of the transmission-distribution sector of Japanese electric utilities using a panel data during the 19811998 period. A stochastic production f...

Jiro Nemoto; Mika Goto

2006-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Minutes of the Tank Waste Science Panel meeting, July 20, 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The second meeting of the Tank Waste Science Panel was held July 20, 1990. Science Panel members discussed the prioritization of various analyses to be performed on core samples from tank 101-SY, and were asked to review and comment on the draft Westinghouse Hanford Company document Analytical Chemistry Plan.'' They also reviewed and discussed the initial contributions to the report titled Chemical and Physical Processes in Tank 101-SY: A Preliminary Report. Science Panel members agreed that a fundamental understanding of the physical and chemical processes in the tank is essential, and strongly recommended that no remediation measures be taken until there is a better understanding of the chemical and physical phenomena that result in the episodic gas release from tank 101-SY. 1 ref.

Strachan, D.M.; Morgan, L.G. (comps.)

1991-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Minimal Viewing Distance Calculation in LED Display Panels  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Light-emitting diode (LED) display panels have received more attention recently. These panels usually are placed in public places such as streets, ...

Nazeran Motlagh, A Ali; Hashemi, B Massoud Reza

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

Obama Administration Announces Plans to Install New Solar Panels...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Plans to Install New Solar Panels on the White House Residence Obama Administration Announces Plans to Install New Solar Panels on the White House Residence October 5, 2010 -...

340

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Activities Panel Discussion: 2010...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Activities Panel Discussion: 2010 SAE World Congress DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Activities Panel Discussion: 2010 SAE World Congress Presentation by...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

New Ideas for Seeding Your Solar Marketplace Workshop Panel Presentati...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Panel Presentations New Ideas for Seeding Your Solar Marketplace Workshop Panel Presentations Download the speaker presentations from the 2014 SunShot Grand Challenge Summit and...

342

The Institute for Water & Watersheds (IWW) Annual Technical Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

timber and salmon to solar panels and semiconductors. But water supply and demand in the state also hosts strong graduate degree programs in Water Resources and is located near state & Watersheds (IWW) Annual Technical Report FY 2010 1 #12;Introduction At Oregon State University, over 125

343

Review of technical justification of assumptions and methods used by the Environmental Protection Agency for estimating risks avoided by implementing MCLs for radionuclides  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed regulations for allowable levels of radioactive material in drinking water (40 CFR Part 141, 56 FR 33050, July 18, 1991). This review examined the assumptions and methods used by EPA in calculating risks that would be avoided by implementing the proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels for uranium, radium, and radon. Proposed limits on gross alpha and beta-gamma emitters were not included in this review.

Morris, S.C.; Rowe, M.D.; Holtzman, S.; Meinhold, A.F.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

Review of state-of-the-art of solar collector corrosion processes. Task 1 of solar collector studies for solar heating and cooling applications. Final technical progress report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The state-of-the-art of solar collector corrosion processes is reviewed, and Task 1 of a current research program on use of aqueous heat transfer fluids for solar heating and cooling is summarized. The review of available published literature has indicated that lack of quantitative information exists relative to collector corrosion at the present time, particularly for the higher temperature applications of solar heating and cooling compared to domestic water heating. Solar collector systems are reviewed from the corrosion/service life viewpoint, with emphasis on various applications, collector design, heat transfer fluids, and freeze protection methods. Available information (mostly qualitative) on collector corrosion technology is reviewed to indicate potential corrosion problem areas and corrosion prevention practices. Sources of limited quantitative data that are reviewed are current solar applications, research programs on collector corrosion, and pertinent experience in related applications of automotive cooling and non-solar heating and cooling. A data bank was developed to catalog corrosion information. Appendix A of this report is a bibliography of the data bank, with abstracts reproduced from presently available literature accessions (about 220). This report is presented as a descriptive summary of information that is contained in the data bank.

Clifford, J E; Diegle, R B

1980-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

345

Nuclear Waste Assessment System for Technical Evaluation (NUWASTE)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NWTRB NWTRB www.nwtrb.gov U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board: Roles and Priorities Presented by: Nigel Mote, Executive Director, U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board May 14, 2013 Hyatt Regency Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. Presented to: National Transportation Stakeholders' Forum NWTRB www.nwtrb.gov U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The Board's Statutory Mandate * The 1987 amendments to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) established the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. * The Board evaluates the technical and scientific validity of DOE activities related to implementing the NWPA, including: - transportation, packaging, and storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW)

346

Panel Discussion Crisis in Ukraine: Six Perspectives  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Panel Discussion Crisis in Ukraine: Six Perspectives Tuesday, March 11, 2014 | 7:00-9:00pm Maurer: Join IU Faculty and special guest, Sean Kay, for a discussion on the events unfolding in Ukraine

Indiana University

347

Estimating Demand Response with Panel Data  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper, we extend to panel data the iterated linear least squares estimator of Blundell and Robin (in J Appl Econometrics 14: 209232 1999). It is shown to be consistent when total expenditure and regre...

Sbastien Lecocq; Jean-Marc Robin

2006-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Extended use of photovoltaic solar panels  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The use of photovoltaic solar panels (and related generation of electric power) can be extended to a 24 hours per day under any environmental condition by equipping them with an artificial source of light with emitting wavelengths matched to the photovoltaic solar panels to be turned on in the absence of sunlight. This source of light can be obtained by heating a mantle to an incandescent temperature via the efficient low polluting combustion of Natural Gas Butane Propane or other gaseous Hydrocarbon fuel.

Guido E. Guazzoni; M. Frank Rose

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Flat panel ferroelectric electron emission display system  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A device which can produce a bright, raster scanned or non-raster scanned image from a flat panel. Unlike many flat panel technologies, this device does not require ambient light or auxiliary illumination for viewing the image. Rather, this device relies on electrons emitted from a ferroelectric emitter impinging on a phosphor. This device takes advantage of a new electron emitter technology which emits electrons with significant kinetic energy and beam current density.

Sampayan, Stephen E. (Manteca, CA); Orvis, William J. (Livermore, CA); Caporaso, George J. (Livermore, CA); Wieskamp, Ted F. (Livermore, CA)

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

351

Neutron shielding panels for reactor pressure vessels  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

In a nuclear reactor neutron panels varying in thickness in the circumferential direction are disposed at spaced circumferential locations around the reactor core so that the greatest radial thickness is at the point of highest fluence with lesser thicknesses at adjacent locations where the fluence level is lower. The neutron panels are disposed between the core barrel and the interior of the reactor vessel to maintain radiation exposure to the vessel within acceptable limits.

Singleton, Norman R. (Murrysville, PA)

2011-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

352

Risk-assessment-methodology development for waste isolation in geologic media. Technical review of documents NUREG/CR-0394, NUREG/CR-0424, NUREG/CR-0458  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A review of five documents that were prepared for the USNRC by Sandia Laboratories is presented in this report. The documents covered in the present review include: NUREG/CR-1262, NUREG/CR-1376, NUREG/CR-1377, NUREG/CR-1397 and NUREG/CR-1608. This constitutes the second phase of the review; the first phase was reported in Volume 1 of NUREG/CR-1672, November 1980. Two of the documents concern simplified computational methods illustrative of the calculations necessary to produce a response surface. Three of the reports pertain to statistical methods, including the application of Latin hypercube Sampling (LHS). The following observations have been made relative to the above reports: (1) the reports are, in general, difficult to read, due, in part, to unnecessarily complicated notation and lack of adequate explanation and examples, (2) the relationship of the work to similar work in the US and abroad is not discussed, and (3) limitations of the LHS method are not discussed in sufficient depth. The Sandia's response to this review is published as NUREG/CR-2428. Volume 1 is scheduled for completion in June 1982.

Stevens, C.A.; Fullwood, R.R.; Basin, S.L.

1980-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Electrohydraulic Forming of Near Net Shape Automotive Panels  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Development of Advancing Automotive Panel Manufacturing for Increased Energy and Material Savings

354

Building Technologies Office: Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Vacuum Insulation Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Vacuum Insulation Panels Research Project on AddThis.com... About Take Action to Save Energy Partner with DOE Activities Appliances Research Building Envelope Research Windows, Skylights, & Doors Research

355

National Climate Assessment: Available Technical Inputs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Available Technical Inputs Print E-mail Available Technical Inputs Print E-mail Technical inputs for the 2013 National Climate Assessment were due March 1, 2012. Please note that these reports were submitted independently to the National Climate Assessment for consideration and have not been reviewed by the National Climate Assessment Development and Advisory Committee. Links to agency-sponsored reports will be posted here as they are made available. Sectors National Climate Assessment Health Sector Literature Review and Bibliography. Technical Input for the Interagency Climate Change and Human Health Group, September 2012. Overview Bibliography Bibliography User's Guide Search Strategy and Results Walthall et al. 2012. Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation. USDA Technical Bulletin 1935. Washington, DC. 186 pages. | Report FAQs

356

AR5 WGIII Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WGIII Review Print E-mail WGIII Review Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report: Working Group III Introduction: The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Second Order Draft of the Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Pre-register Today To be notified when the Second Order Draft of the Working Group III contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 5th Assessment report is available for review, please click here. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the submission of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 27 March 2013 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

357

AR5 WGII Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WGII Review Print E-mail WGII Review Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report: Working Group II Introduction: The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Second Order Draft of the Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2013: Impacts, Adaptation and Vlunerability. Pre-register Today To be notified when the Second Order Draft of the Working Group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 5th Assessment report is available for review, please click here. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the submission of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 1 May 2013 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

358

A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper presents an overview of the technical and economic aspects, as well as the market evolution of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). This is an unconventional but very promising technology for the conversion of thermal energy, at low and medium temperatures, into electrical and/or mechanical energy on a small scale. As it makes a greater and/or more intensive use of its energy source, this technology could facilitate an electricity supply to unconnected areas, the self-production of energy, the desalination of seawater for human consumption, or even to increase the energy efficiency in the industrial sector respecting the environment. A look at the scientific publications on this topic shows an open research line, namely the selection of a suitable working fluid for these systems, since there is as yet none that provides all aspects that must be taken into account in ORCs. Furthermore, a description and an analysis of the applications of the proposed technology is carried out, specifying the main providers, which at the present time is limited mainly to the range 0.22MWe with a cost of around 1 and 4נ103/kWe. Lower powers are in pre-commercial status.

Fredy Vlez; Jos J. Segovia; M. Carmen Martn; Gregorio Antoln; Farid Chejne; Ana Quijano

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Building America 2013 Technical Update Meeting | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Building America 2013 Technical Update Meeting Building America 2013 Technical Update Meeting Building America 2013 Technical Update Meeting The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building America program held its fourth annual Technical Update meeting on April 29-30, 2013, in Denver, Colorado. This meeting showcased world-class building science expertise for high performance homes in a dynamic format that addressed eight key critical questions facing the building industry today. This Technical Update Meeting combined expert presentations, panel discussions, and audience participation to update the industry on the latest technologies and practices. View the meeting presentations below, which are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. The meeting summary report will be available soon. You can also view the complete webinar recordings for Day 1 (video) and Day 2 (video).

360

November 29, 2010, Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution FROM: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel SUBJECT: Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability - 10-NA SC-010 This Quarterly Report on the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) contains information on the status of qualifications in the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) and technical skill gaps as of September 30, 2010. Attachment 1 provides the Status of Qualifications in the TQP. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) goal is to exceed 80% "fully qualified or on schedule for qualification" for all personnel in the TQP. Currently, this overall DOE TQP qualification rate is 90%. In addition, 71% of all required personnel are fully qualified. Headquarters and site office managers are encouraged to maintain emphasis on the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Proceedings of the Advanced Turbine Systems annual program review meeting  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Goals of the 8-year program are to develop cleaner, more efficient, and less expensive gas turbine systems for utility and industrial electric power generation, cogeneration, and mechanical drive units. During this Nov. 9-11, 1994, meeting, presentations on energy policy issues were delivered by representatives of regulatory, industry, and research institutions; program overviews and technical reviews were given by contractors; and ongoing and proposed future projects sponsored by university and industry were presented and displayed at the poster session. Panel discussions on distributed power and Advanced Gas Systems Research education provided a forum for interactive dialog and exchange of ideas. Exhibitors included US DOE, Solar Turbines, Westinghouse, Allison Engine Co., and GE.

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

362

Microsoft Word - Final_CRB_Panel_questions_Revisions_6_1_2011 (2)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion OECM Annual Project Management Workshop, March 16, 2011 1 Question: Does the Certification Review Board (CRB or the Board) consider past performance when determining whether to grant or deny Federal Project Director (FPD) certification? Answer: The Board does consider past performance. An FPD's performance on his/her projects is one indicator of his/her ability to successfully manage future projects, especially at Levels 3 and 4 which tend to be more complicated and have a higher level of risk. Question: If I take over a failing project, does that automatically mean that my performance will be judged as inadequate? Answer: The Board is interested in a candidate's performance to determine if he/she made a positive

363

Microsoft Word - Final_CRB_Panel_questions_Revisions_6_1_2011 (2)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion OECM Annual Project Management Workshop, March 16, 2011 1 Question: Does the Certification Review Board (CRB or the Board) consider past performance when determining whether to grant or deny Federal Project Director (FPD) certification? Answer: The Board does consider past performance. An FPD's performance on his/her projects is one indicator of his/her ability to successfully manage future projects, especially at Levels 3 and 4 which tend to be more complicated and have a higher level of risk. Question: If I take over a failing project, does that automatically mean that my performance will be judged as inadequate? Answer: The Board is interested in a candidate's performance to determine if he/she made a positive

364

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. The research questions and objectives are of interest in potentially shedding light onto food web relationships identify how the data that are being collected will be useful in unambiguously clarifying food web

365

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of nutrient availability and food web productivity has been widely promoted as an effective restoration not seem to support the overarching objective of the study (effect of salmon carcass analogs on food web web enhancement of salmon streams and identifies several knowledge gaps that this study will attempt

366

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

restoration plans for the Columbia Basin. The enhancement of nutrient availability and food web productivity, the effect of SCA addition on food web dynamics. The CPOM information would be valuable only if there is some hypothesized link between leaf litter transport rates and the manner in which SCA will impact food web dynamics

367

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, nutrient addition, and invasive species removal. The ISRP did find the emphasis placed on food web response with carcass analogs. In addition, one of the study sites (Hancock Springs) also will evaluate food web response to habitat restoration and removal of brook trout. Unfortunately, in the ISRP's judgment

368

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that have the potential to solve or provide longer-term treatment of the phosphorous eutrophication problem

369

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to the phosphorous eutrophication problem. We suggested that an adequate future proposal should explore potential-term treatment of the phosphorous eutrophication problem than oxygenation · include trout survival measurements

370

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

is the source(s) of anthropogenic phosphorous loading to Twin Lakes? · The proposal does not present basic

371

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

is being developed this summer. The success of this program will be dependent on the process and criteria on habitat conditions, including coordination between program objectives and current understanding normative conditions would have on VSP parameters. This provides a high-level indication of what might

372

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Approach, for Determining the Effects of Hatchery Reforms on Extinction Risk and Recovery ................................................................................................................................. 2 Proposal 10: A Tool for Evaluating Risks and Benefits of Reform Actions in Hatchery Programs (WDFW)................................................................................................................................2 Proposal 13: Analytical Approach for Determination of Effects of Hatchery Reform on Extinction

373

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Approach, for Determining the Effects of Hatchery Reforms on Extinction Risk and Recovery ................................................................................................................................. 2 Proposal 10: A Tool for Evaluating Risks and Benefits of Reform Actions in Hatchery Programs (WDFW)................................................................................................................................3 Proposal 13: Analytical Approach for Determination of Effects of Hatchery Reform on Extinction

374

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ecological consequences of not obtaining the property. However, the ISRP noted that the proposal was lacking truth" reference for evaluating the proposal. #12;ISRP 2002-1 Arrowleaf 2 With this report

375

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.................................................................................................. 66 Water Quality: Gas Bubble, Temperature, and Contaminants ............................. 73 Juvenile $207,180 $1,060,638 Yes 96 35004 Harvest Model Development UW $278,398 $794,416 No, Not Fundable (but Evaluate Restoration Potential of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Spawning Habitat PNNL $315,000 $1

376

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) and Objective 2 (i.e., Develop a protocol for long- term monitoring and index of abundance of adult Pacific of the half-duplex PIT tag census technique and the development of a protocol for monitoring and indexing Criteria (Qualified) The first qualification is that upon completion the full-scale project design

377

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Roosevelt from WDFW Fall Walleye Index Netting (FWIN) should be fully examined and analyzed to determine recommended "Implement Objective 1, deliverable 1 only through completion and not beyond FY2017 (Analysis of Fall Walleye Index Netting Bycatch Data). #12;2 Sponsor to submit revised proposal based

378

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

projects might make a substantial contribution to the restoration of aquatic ecosystems in the South Fork Reestablish Connectivity and Restore Fish Habitat in the East Fork of the South Fork Salmon River Watershed of a scope change submittal for the Nez Perce Tribe's project Reestablish Connectivity and Restore Fish

379

Sandia National Laboratories: DOE Hydrogen Safety Review Panel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Plan Webinar Wednesday, Jan. 14 Sandian Presents on PV Failure Analysis at European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSC) EC Top Publications Design and Analysis for...

380

Report of the geotechnical panel on the effective life of rooms in Panel 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An evaluation of the effective life of underground rooms in Panel I of the waste storage area of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) was performed during April 1991 by a panel of geotechnical experts. The evaluation addressed concerns regarding WIPP`s ability to complete a test program proposed for Panel 1. This program currently requires bins containing controlled quantities of contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste to be placed in rooms in the panel. The bins will be monitored to obtain data on the potential generation of gases from the degradation of wastes emplaced in the WIPP underground facility. The purpose of the evaluation was (1) to provide an estimate of the life expectancy of the rooms in Panel 1; and (2) if necessary, to recommend additional remedial actions that would improve the longevity of Panel 1 rooms to allow the testing to be successfully completed. Panel 1, the first panel to be mined in the waste storage area, was developed to receive waste for a demonstration phase that was scheduled to start in October 1988. Mining of the panel began during the second half of 1986 and was completed to final dimensions in June 1988. The original plan was to store drums of CH TRU waste in rooms for a period of 5 years. The demonstration phase was changed to an experimental program that will use CH TRU waste in bin scale tests which will be located in Panel 1. For the purposes of this report, a nine-year test period beginning July, 1991, was assumed to be necessary to complete these bin scale tests.

Not Available

1991-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Report of the geotechnical panel on the effective life of rooms in Panel 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

An evaluation of the effective life of underground rooms in Panel I of the waste storage area of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) was performed during April 1991 by a panel of geotechnical experts. The evaluation addressed concerns regarding WIPP's ability to complete a test program proposed for Panel 1. This program currently requires bins containing controlled quantities of contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste to be placed in rooms in the panel. The bins will be monitored to obtain data on the potential generation of gases from the degradation of wastes emplaced in the WIPP underground facility. The purpose of the evaluation was (1) to provide an estimate of the life expectancy of the rooms in Panel 1; and (2) if necessary, to recommend additional remedial actions that would improve the longevity of Panel 1 rooms to allow the testing to be successfully completed. Panel 1, the first panel to be mined in the waste storage area, was developed to receive waste for a demonstration phase that was scheduled to start in October 1988. Mining of the panel began during the second half of 1986 and was completed to final dimensions in June 1988. The original plan was to store drums of CH TRU waste in rooms for a period of 5 years. The demonstration phase was changed to an experimental program that will use CH TRU waste in bin scale tests which will be located in Panel 1. For the purposes of this report, a nine-year test period beginning July, 1991, was assumed to be necessary to complete these bin scale tests.

Not Available

1991-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

2015 GTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The annual Peer Review offers geothermal stakeholders an opportunity to learn about the projects funded by DOE across a wide spectrum of technical complexity and funding magnitude, from research...

383

Two stage fluid bed-plasma gasification process for solid waste valorisation: Technical review and preliminary thermodynamic modelling of sulphur emissions  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We investigate sulphur during MSW gasification within a fluid bed-plasma process. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We review the literature on the feed, sulphur and process principles therein. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer The need for research in this area was identified. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We perform thermodynamic modelling of the fluid bed stage. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Initial findings indicate the prominence of solid phase sulphur. - Abstract: Gasification of solid waste for energy has significant potential given an abundant feed supply and strong policy drivers. Nonetheless, significant ambiguities in the knowledge base are apparent. Consequently this study investigates sulphur mechanisms within a novel two stage fluid bed-plasma gasification process. This paper includes a detailed review of gasification and plasma fundamentals in relation to the specific process, along with insight on MSW based feedstock properties and sulphur pollutant therein. As a first step to understanding sulphur partitioning and speciation within the process, thermodynamic modelling of the fluid bed stage has been performed. Preliminary findings, supported by plant experience, indicate the prominence of solid phase sulphur species (as opposed to H{sub 2}S) - Na and K based species in particular. Work is underway to further investigate and validate this.

Morrin, Shane, E-mail: shane.morrin@ucl.ac.uk [Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE (United Kingdom); Advanced Plasma Power, South Marston Business park, Swindon, SN3 4DE (United Kingdom); Lettieri, Paola, E-mail: p.lettieri@ucl.ac.uk [Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE (United Kingdom); Chapman, Chris, E-mail: chris.chapman@app-uk.com [Advanced Plasma Power, South Marston Business park, Swindon, SN3 4DE (United Kingdom); Mazzei, Luca, E-mail: l.mazzei@ucl.ac.uk [Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE (United Kingdom)

2012-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

384

Independent External Peer Review Report Wood River 19 August 2011 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Wood River 19 August 2011 ii Table of Contents List.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 6 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Preparation of Comments and Panel IEPR Process 5 Figure 3. IEPR Team 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Wood River 19 August

US Army Corps of Engineers

385

Independent External Peer Review Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Independent External Peer Review Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache, New Mexico. 1) Contract No. W912HQ-11-D-0002 10 August 2012 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report (Rev. 1 of Panel 6 3.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 7 3.4 Performing the IEPR 8 3

US Army Corps of Engineers

386

Independent External Peer Review Report Green Bay 20 June 2011 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Green Bay 20 June 2011 ii Table of Contents List for Peer Review Panel 6 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Preparation of Comments and Panel Consensus Process 4 Figure 3. IEPR Team 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Green Bay 20 June 2011 iii

US Army Corps of Engineers

387

Independent External Peer Review Report Lower Snake River 24 May 2013 ii  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Lower Snake River 24 May 2013 ii Table of Contents and Schedule 9 3.2 Selection of Panel 10 3.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 11 3 of Interest Questionnaire D-1 List of Figures Figure 1. IEPR Team 14 #12;Independent External Peer Review

US Army Corps of Engineers

388

Technical assessment of the Office of Industrial Programs' Advanced Heat Exchanger Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE's AHX Program is an integral part of the OIP's Waste Heat Recovery Program whose goals are to increase the end-use energy efficiency of industry and agricultural operations, and to expand the energy options for manufacturing processes by providing technologies which use various fuels including coal, renewables, oil, and natural gas. The OIP and PNL convened a panel of industry experts to conduct a technical assessment of OIP's AHX program. This report documents the results of the panel's assessment.

Rinker, F.G.; Bergles, A.E.; Marciniak, T.J.; Batman, J.

1987-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

September 13, 2011, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting - Presentation: FY 2011 Operational Plan Goal Status for Goal 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ed Parsons/Dave Chaney Ed Parsons/Dave Chaney y Sept 13, 2011  Objective 1: Create 2015 Vision Statement j (Parsons and Chaney)  Result: For DOE to be a technically proficient enterprise, with federal technical personnel overseeing Defense Nuclear Facilities in a overseeing Defense Nuclear Facilities in a manner that enables and enhances the DOE mission in a technically defensible fashion, while being recognized as preeminent in federal technical leadership and competency. (Post on DOE FTCP Website) DOE FTCP Website)  Objective 2: Design and Conduct Assessments j g to Evaluate Effectiveness of FTC Panel and Program (Ghovanlou, Parsons, Chaney)  Result: FTC Panel Agent Sur e Prepared/Distributed  FTC Panel Agent Survey Prepared/Distributed  FTC Panel Agent Survey Results Compiled, g

390

Implementation of Safeguards and Security Policy Panels  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5,2008 5,2008 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM URITY OFFICER AND SECURITY SUBJECT: Implementation of Safeguards and Security Policy Panels The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) recognizes the importance of well- conceived strategies and policies to support and communicate the security posture of the Department. In order for our security policies to properly reflect and enable Department of Energy corporate strategies, early and frequent communication between policy makers and end users is essential. As outlined in the attached HSS memo, dated December 3,2007, subject: Safeguards and Security Policy Panels, the HSS Office of Security Policy is establishing several new policy panels that will create new opportunities for communication and will include those

391

Optical panel system including stackable waveguides  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

An optical panel system including stackable waveguides is provided. The optical panel system displays a projected light image and comprises a plurality of planar optical waveguides in a stacked state. The optical panel system further comprises a support system that aligns and supports the waveguides in the stacked state. In one embodiment, the support system comprises at least one rod, wherein each waveguide contains at least one hole, and wherein each rod is positioned through a corresponding hole in each waveguide. In another embodiment, the support system comprises at least two opposing edge structures having the waveguides positioned therebetween, wherein each opposing edge structure contains a mating surface, wherein opposite edges of each waveguide contain mating surfaces which are complementary to the mating surfaces of the opposing edge structures, and wherein each mating surface of the opposing edge structures engages a corresponding complementary mating surface of the opposite edges of each waveguide.

DeSanto, Leonard (Dunkirk, MD); Veligdan, James T. (Manorville, NY)

2007-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

392

Circuits in the Sun: Solar Panel Physics  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Typical commercial solar panels consist of approximately 60 individual photovoltaic cells connected in series. Since the usual Kirchhoff rules apply the current is uniform throughout the circuit while the electric potential of the individual devices is cumulative. Hence a solar panel is a good analog of a simple resistive series circuit except that the devices generate (rather than burn!) electrical power. For example in order to sustain the current flow each device must generate the requisite current. As a result the least efficient device limits the current throughout. Photovoltaic cells also have a more complicated current-voltage (IV) characteristic which determines the optimal load for power extraction. These considerations among others make the solar panel an excellent platform for exploring the physics of electric circuits.

Tim Gfroerer

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Panel Discussion | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

86 86 Varnish cache server Home Groups Community Central Green Button Applications Developer Utility Rate FRED: FRee Energy Database More Public Groups Private Groups Features Groups Blog posts Content Stream Documents Discussions Polls Q & A Events Notices My stuff Energy blogs 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142234786 Varnish cache server Panel Discussion Home Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 10 October, 2012 - 09:02 GRR Workshop at GRC GRC GRR Panel Discussion workshop Last week, Tuesday (10/2), we held an all-day workshop at the Peppermill Hotel in Reno, NV. The workshop included presentations on the project background and history, status updates, analysis summary and future directions. The day ended with a panel discussion, with members including

394

Panel Session III: Innovation and Coordination  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned for Hydrogen Panel Session III: Innovation Panel Session III: Innovation and Coordination and Coordination ______________________________ Stefan Unnasch Life Cycle Associates 3 April 2008 2 Hydrogen Vision Life Cycle Associates 3 Hydrogen Infrastructure Today Life Cycle Associates Source: Weinert, J. X., et al.. (2005). CA Hydrogen Highway Network Blueprint Plan, Economics Report 4 Innovation and Coordination Life Cycle Associates Innovation Coordination ☯ Slow Fast Cars Codes 5 Innovation and Coordination Life Cycle Associates Innovation Coordination ☯ Slow Fast Cars Codes Fuel production and delivery technology Vehicle technology Marketing Policy Early introduction strategy GHG strategies

395

2015 Peer Review Agenda for the Geothermal Technologies Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Energy Department's Geothermal Technologies Office hosts its 2015 Peer Review on May 11-14, 2015, with a rigorous review of the technical project portfolio.

396

INL Technical Publications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical Publications This site contains Idaho National Laboratory scientific and technical information products that have been issued for unlimited distribution. Those products...

397

STEVE SHEPHERD Bakken Workforce Development Panel  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

helped area community and tribal colleges to equip, furnish, and develop programs to train students. United Tribes Technical College received TAACCCT funding for a consortium...

398

Peer Review Hit Hard By Shutdown  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Review Hit Hard By Shutdown ... The peer review system at many federal science funding agencies is gradually working its way out of chaos after the conclusion of a 16-day government shutdown. ... Hundreds of grant review panels were canceled at NSF and NIH alone. ...

ANDREA WIDENER

2013-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

399

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report from the Peer Review Panel Report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Team Members: Kathryn Newcomer, The George Washington University (Chair) Irwin Feller, The Pennsylvania State University (Retired) Stephanie Shipman, Government Accountability Office Kathleen Sedlak O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency Faith Lambert, EERE Final Report February 1, 2008 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) within the U.S. Department of Energy asked a panel of experts with relevant knowledge to review the evaluation activities of the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit (PAE) within EERE's Office of Planning, Budget and

400

Training for Emergencies Panel: Chris Reed  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Training for Emergencies Panel: Chris Reed Ben Berman Immanuel Barshi It's very important to have pilots sharing ideas with other instructor pilots. IB: In aviation there is a lot of mentor training. Instructor pilots are not trained trainers; they are aviators who are providing training. When things

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Commonsense and Embodied Agents A Panel Discussion  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Commonsense and Embodied Agents A Panel Discussion Stuart C. Shapiro Computer Science and Engineering University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Buffalo, NY, USA shapiro Reasoning Group Grosskreutz: Knowledge-based Systems Group Shapiro: The SNePS Research Group Randell

Shapiro, Stuart C.

402

Commonsense and Embodied Agents A Panel Discussion  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Commonsense and Embodied Agents A Panel Discussion Stuart C. Shapiro Computer Science and Engineering University at Bu#11;alo, The State University of New York Bu#11;alo, NY, USA shapiro Reasoning Group Grosskreutz: Knowledge-based Systems Group Shapiro: The SNePS Research Group Randell

Shapiro, Stuart C.

403

Flexible solar panels for frontline power  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Flexible solar panels for frontline power Blast debris x-rays to develop better armour Reducing to improve mission outcomes 6 Solar energy for soldier mobility 8 Reducing the risk of missile strike 10 Major research effort delivers air power enhancement 12 On a whale hunt to save the wildlife 13 Briefs

404

Input to Priorities Panel August 7, 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Input to Priorities Panel August 7, 2012 Jeff Freidberg MIT 1 #12;The Emperor of Fusion has · Comparison (1 GW overnight cost) · Coal $ 3B · Gas $ 1B · Nuclear $ 4B · Wind $ 2B · Solar-T $ 3B · ITER $25B

405

Dale Meade regarding input international collaboration panel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Dale Meade regarding input international collaboration panel 1 message Saskia to add 2 comments to this discussion: 1. This regards not only international collaborations, but also national collaborations. We need to decide on using 1 video conferencing system. One of the main

406

Another Panel Rejects Nevada Disaster Theory  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...southern Nevada United States waste disposal Yucca Mountain GeoRef, Copyright 2004, American...panel noted that 434 additional funding of $40 million would al-low...limited intellectual appeal, Yucca Mountain in far southern Ne-vada is fast...

Richard A. Kerr

1992-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

407

FEMP Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Panel Report Panel Report September 20-21, 2005 FEMP PEER REVIEW PANEL Paul DeCotis, Chair New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Floyd E. Barwig Iowa Energy Center Richard S. Brent Solar Turbines, Inc. Bruce Gross Dominion Federal Corporation Kenneth L. James Pacific Gas and Electric Company Meg Matt The Matt Group Richard A. Morgan Morgan Marketing Partners Francis J. Murray, Jr. Energy/Environmental Consultant Maria Papadakis James Madison University Polly N. Shaw Consultant Susan E. Stratton Energy Center of Wisconsin James J. Winebrake, Ph.D. Rochester Institute of Technology David B. Zabetakis David B. Zabetakis, LLC November 4, 2005 Mr. Rick Khan, Program Manager Federal Energy Management Program U.S. Department of Energy

408

SRREN Comment and Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation Introduction: As part of the Final Government Distribution of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN), the U.S. Government is conducting a review of the Summary for Policymakers for the report. This web site is posted on the internet for the sole purpose of facilitating the U.S. Government review at this time. The U.S. Government provided comments previously as part of the Government and Expert Review hosted on this web site. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research

409

Standard Review Plan Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Milestones Review & Approval Standard Review Plan (SRP) E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a n a g e m e n t DOE - EM - SRP - 2010 2nd Edition Overview March 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 1 Standard Review Plan Overview Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision Milestones Review and Approval The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission-critical projects/facilities. Coupled with this ongoing mission is the added responsibility for EM to diligently leverage and apply American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds to accelerate the completion of its

410

Renewable Energy Technical Potential | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technical Potential Technical Potential Dataset Summary Description No description given. Source National Renewable Energy Laboratory Date Released July 03rd, 2012 (2 years ago) Date Updated July 03rd, 2012 (2 years ago) Keywords biopower csp geothermal hydropower hydrothermal Renewable Energy Technical Potential rooftop United States utility-scale wind Data text/csv icon United States Renewable Energy Technical Potential (csv, 7.7 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset Usefulness of the metadata Average vote Your vote Usefulness of the dataset Average vote Your vote Ease of access Average vote Your vote Overall rating

411

A technical review of non-destructive assay research for the characterization of spent nuclear fuel assemblies being conducted under the US DOE NGSI  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There is a growing belief that expansion of nuclear energy generation will be needed in the coming decades as part of a mixed supply chain to meet global energy demand. At stake is the health of the economic engine that delivers human prosperity. As a consequence renewed interest is being paid to the safe management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and the plutonium it contains. In addition to being an economically valuable resource because it can be used to construct explosive devices, Pu must be placed on an inventory and handled securely. A multiinstitutional team of diverse specialists has been assembled under a project funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI) to address ways to nondestructively quantify the plutonium content of spent nuclear fuel assemblies, and to also detect the potential diversion of pins from those assemblies. Studies are underway using mostly Monte Carlo tools to assess the feasibility, individual and collective performance capability of some fourteen nondestructive assay methods. Some of the methods are familiar but are being applied in a new way against a challenging target which is being represented with a higher degree of realism in simulation space than has been done before, while other methods are novel. In this work we provide a brief review of the techniques being studied and highlight the main achievements to date. We also draw attention to the deficiencies identified in for example modeling capability and available basic nuclear data. We conclude that this is an exciting time to be working in the NDA field and that much work, both fundamental and applied, remains ahead if we are to advance the state of the practice to meet the challenges posed to domestic and international safeguards by the expansion of nuclear energy together with the emergence of alternative fuel cycles.

Croft, Stephen [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Tobin, Stephen J [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

412

EMSL: External Peer Reviewers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo External peer reviewers are valuable contributors to EMSL's user proposals process. They provide objective evaluations of the quality of the proposals according to established review criteria, and participate on Review Panels that calibrate the proposals into a ranked order. EMSL is truly grateful to the researchers who donated their time and efforts in fiscal year 2012 to

413

Arizona: Solar Panels Replace Inefficient Fossil Fuel-Powered...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Arizona: Solar Panels Replace Inefficient Fossil Fuel-Powered Energy Systems Arizona: Solar Panels Replace Inefficient Fossil Fuel-Powered Energy Systems May 1, 2014 - 9:33am...

414

Solar panel manufacturing is greener in Europe than China, study...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The chart shows the number of years that a solar panel must operate in order to generate enough electricity to "pay back" the energy used to make the panel. Because there are fewer...

415

Mechanical behavior of dip-brazed aluminum sandwich panels  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An experimental study was carried out to determine the mechanical behavior of sandwich panels containing cellular cores of varying shape. Compression and four point bend tests were performed on sandwich panels with square ...

Hohmann, Brian P. (Brian Patrick)

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Technical Consultant Contract  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Technical Consultant Contract, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

417

DOE Approved Technical Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE.

418

Technical Consultant Report Template  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Technical Consultant Report Template, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

419

Code Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office Department of Energy Washington, DC APRIL 2013 1 Welcome Welcome to The Building Technologies Office's Code Compliance Technical Meeting and to Washington, DC. On behalf of the Department of Energy Building Technology Office (BTO), we would like to thank you for attending, for your participation. The goal of this meeting is to review and discuss ongoing projects and existing activities that improve compliance with model energy codes. DOE

420

NO. REV. MO EASEP SOLAR PANEL OCCULTAT ION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

., : :. I · ' NO. REV. MO· EATM-59 EASEP SOLAR PANEL OCCULTAT ION PAGE l OF 9 DATE 24 Feb 1969 ()i~ ~ .I /1'1 . ! I Prepared by:~ ~Wallack . 11 ''--'/ ~~~ #12;: : .. EASEP SOLAR PANEL OCCULTATION. EATM-59 PAGE 2 OF 9 DATE 24 Feb I969 #12;NO. RIV. NO. : : .~ EASEP Solar Panel Occultation EATM-59 PAGI

Rathbun, Julie A.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF TWO SOLAR PANEL SIMULATIONS Krisztina Leban  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF TWO SOLAR PANEL SIMULATIONS Krisztina Leban Institute of Energy Technology solar panel for varying temperature and irradiance. Final validation was done by comparing experimental are a renewable, non-polluting source of energy that are increasingly used for hybrid (solar panels and grid

Ritchie, Ewen

422

Chemical technology news from across RSC Publishing. Printing solar panels  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Publishing Chemical technology news from across RSC Publishing. Printing solar panels 22 January size) silicon microcells that connect together to form flexible solar panels. By stamping hundreds solar panels 2/8/2010http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/ChemTech/Volume/2010/02/printing_solar.asp #12;Page 2

Rogers, John A.

423

Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels Bryan Bollinger NYU Stern School base of consumers in the reference group. We study the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels of an environmentally beneficial technology, solar photovoltaic (PV) panels. Policymakers are particularly interested

Lee, Daeyeol

424

GENERAL TECHNICAL BASELINE QUALIFICATION STANDARD SUGGESTED STUDY REFERENCES  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References Baseline Qualification Standard Suggested Study References 2007 revision This list provides suggested study references for the technical competencies of the General Technical Base Qualification Standard (DOE STD 1146-2007). More comprehensive resources are available through the DOE Online Learning Center's training courses and the study guides available through the Federal Technical Capability Panel web site. The Uniform Resource Locaters for these sites are listed in the Standard. This list is arranged by Technical Competency, followed by the suggested reference source. Some competencies deal directly with DOE or Federal directives, and they are also the reference. In a few cases, the Study Guide is the only concise source, and appropriate sections are listed.

425

Building Technologies Office: Building America 2013 Technical Update  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2013 Technical Update Meeting 2013 Technical Update Meeting The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building America program held its fourth annual Technical Update meeting on April 29-30, 2013, in Denver, Colorado. This meeting showcased world-class building science expertise for high performance homes in a dynamic format that addressed eight key critical questions facing the building industry today. This Technical Update Meeting combined expert presentations, panel discussions, and audience participation to update the industry on the latest technologies and practices. View the meeting presentations below, which are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. The meeting summary report will be available soon. You can also view the complete webinar recordings for Day 1 (WMV 102 MB) and Day 2 (WMV 93 MB).

426

Microsoft PowerPoint - 15.1615_Cost Estimating Panel  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Industry Best Practices Industry Best Practices in Cost Estimating in Cost Estimating SM&A MCR, LLC U.S. COST Project Time & Cost Inc Project Time & Cost, Inc. * SM&A (Moderator) * SM&A (Moderator) - Michael R. Nosbisch, Vice President * MCR LLC MCR, LLC - Neal D. Hulkower, Vice President * U S Cost U.S. Cost - Wade L. Martin, Sr. Vice President * Project Time & Cost, Inc. Project Time & Cost, Inc. - Kenneth A. Roberts, Executive Vice President The Panel 2 15 March 2011 Modern Cost Estimating: A Work in Progress Neal D Hulkower Ph D Neal D. Hulkower, Ph.D. Vice President, Technical Planning d Q lit S t and Quality Support MCR, LLC "S-Curve" Value Percentile FY10$M 10% 516.81 20% 538.98 30% 557.85 Cumulative Chart .750 1.000 10,000 Trials Program Alpha 40% 575.48 50% 592.72 60% 609.70 70% 629.19 80%

427

Perspectives from the Board's Technical Staff  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from the Board's from the Board's Technical Staff AP Poloski, S Sircar, MW Dunlevy, F Bamdad, SA Stokes June 5, 2012 This presentation contains information collected by the Board's technical staff and no official support or endorsement of these remarks by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board is intended or should be inferred. Outline * Purpose: Review the values used by DOE contractors for dispersion analysis against DOE directives * Summary of Staff Complex-wide Review * Areas of Discussion - methods for determining atmospheric stability class; - use of extremely stable (G) atmospheric stability class; - selection of atmospheric dispersion coefficients; - correction for wind speed height; - selection of surface roughness; - adjusting dispersion coefficients due to surface roughness;

428

FAR Card: Technical specifiers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

specifiers specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product."

429

NTP-CERHR Expert Panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of 1-bromopropane  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) established the NTP Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) in June 1998. The purpose of the CERHR is to provide timely, unbiased, scientifically sound evaluations of human and experimental evidence for adverse effects on reproduction, including development, caused by agents to which humans may be exposed. 1-Bromopropane (1-BP) was nominated by NIOSH and selected for evaluation by the CERHR based primarily on documented evidence of worker exposures and published evidence of reproductive and developmental toxicity in rodents. 1-BP is used in spray adhesives and as a precision cleaner and degreaser. It may also be used as an intermediate in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, insecticides, quaternary ammonium compounds, flavors, and fragrances and as a solvent for fats, waxes, or resins. The evaluation of 1-BP was a 4-month effort by a 10-member panel of academic, private, and government scientists that culminated in a public meeting in December 2001. At that meeting, the Expert Panel reviewed the scientific evidence on 1-BP and reached conclusions regarding its potential effects on human reproduction and development. The background information on 1-BP and findings of the Expert Panel are contained within this report. Expert Panel reports are intended to (1) interpret the strength of scientific evidence that a given exposure or exposure circumstance may pose a hazard to reproduction and the health and welfare of children; (2) provide objective and scientifically thorough assessments of the scientific evidence that adverse reproductive/developmental health effects are associated with exposure to specific chemicals or classes of chemicals, including descriptions of any uncertainties that would diminish confidence in assessment of risks; and (3) identify knowledge gaps to help establish research and testing priorities. Staff scientists from the CERHR and members of the CERHR Core Committee (oversight committee to the CERHR whose members include NTP participating agencies) have reviewed the report and the CERHR will seek public review and comment through a Federal Register notice. Subsequent to this comment period, the NTP will prepare the NTP-CERHR monograph on 1-bromopropane that contains its conclusions regarding the potential for 1-BP to adversely affect human reproduction or development. The NTP will base its conclusions on the Expert Panel report on 1-bromopropane, any public comments received on that report, and any relevant information available since the Expert Panel Meeting. The NTP-CERHR monograph will include the public comments and the Expert Panel report as appendices. The NTP-CERHR report on 1-bromopropane will be made publicly available and transmitted to health and regulatory agencies. The NTP and the CERHR wish to thank the members of the bromopropanes Expert Panel for their contributions to the evaluation of 1-BP. We greatly appreciate their time, effort, and objectivity during this evaluation process. We also wish to thank the contract staff for their support in convening the Expert Panel and preparing the Expert Panel report. The NTP-CERHR is headquartered at NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC and is staffed and administered by scientists and support personnel at NIEHS and at Sciences International, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia. Reports can be obtained from the website (http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov) or from: Michael D. Shelby, Ph.D., NIEHS EC-32, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Tel.: +1-919-541-3455; e-mail: shelby@niehs.nih.gov

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Senior Technical Safety Manager  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Program Technical Program Manager Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1178-2004 May 2013 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program. Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to the Office of Leadership and Career Manager, Technical Qualification Program (TQP), Albuquerque Complex. This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... ii

431

1996 DOE technical standards program workshop: Proceedings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The workshop theme is `The Strategic Standardization Initiative - A Technology Exchange and Global Competitiveness Challenge for DOE.` The workshop goal is to inform the DOE technical standards community of strategic standardization activities taking place in the Department, other Government agencies, standards developing organizations, and industry. Individuals working on technical standards will be challenged to improve cooperation and communications with the involved organizations in response to the initiative. Workshop sessions include presentations by representatives from various Government agencies that focus on coordination among and participation of Government personnel in the voluntary standards process; reports by standards organizations, industry, and DOE representatives on current technology exchange programs; and how the road ahead appears for `information superhighway` standardization. Another session highlights successful standardization case studies selected from several sites across the DOE complex. The workshop concludes with a panel discussion on the goals and objectives of the DOE Technical Standards Program as envisioned by senior DOE management. The annual workshop on technical standards has proven to be an effective medium for communicating information related to standards throughout the DOE community. Technical standards are used to transfer technology and standardize work processes to produce consistent, acceptable results. They provide a practical solution to the Department`s challenge to protect the environment and the health and safety of the public and workers during all facility operations. Through standards, the technologies of industries and governments worldwide are available to DOE. The DOE Technical Standards Program, a Department-wide effort that crosscuts all organizations and disciplines, links the Department to those technologies.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE FOCUSED FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN FOR DESIGNATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS CONTRIBUTING TO THE SOUTHWEST GROUNDWATER PLUME AT THE PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently developing a Proposed Plan (PP) for remediation of designated sources of chlorinated solvents that contribute contamination to the Southwest (SW) Groundwater Plume at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), in Paducah, KY. The principal contaminants in the SW Plume are trichloroethene (TCE) and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs); these industrial solvents were used and disposed in various facilities and locations at PGDP. In the SW plume area, residual TCE sources are primarily in the fine-grained sediments of the Upper Continental Recharge System (UCRS), a partially saturated zone that delivers contaminants downward into the coarse-grained Regional Gravel Aquifer (RGA). The RGA serves as the significant lateral groundwater transport pathway for the plume. In the SW Plume area, the four main contributing TCE source units are: (1) Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 1 / Oil Landfarm; (2) C-720 Building TCE Northeast Spill Site (SWMU 211A); (3) C-720 Building TCE Southeast Spill Site (SWMU 211B); and (4) C-747 Contaminated Burial Yard (SWMU 4). The PP presents the Preferred Alternatives for remediation of VOCs in the UCRS at the Oil Landfarm and the C-720 Building spill sites. The basis for the PP is documented in a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) (DOE, 2011) and a Site Investigation Report (SI) (DOE, 2007). The SW plume is currently within the boundaries of PGDP (i.e., does not extend off-site). Nonetheless, reasonable mitigation of the multiple contaminant sources contributing to the SW plume is one of the necessary components identified in the PGDP End State Vision (DOE, 2005). Because of the importance of the proposed actions DOE assembled an Independent Technical Review (ITR) team to provide input and assistance in finalizing the PP.

Looney, B.; Eddy-Dilek, C.; Amidon, M.; Rossabi, J.; Stewart, L.

2011-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

433

Demonstration of membrane aeration panels: City of Geneva Wastewater Treatment Plant. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the design, construction, and testing of membrane aeration panels at the Marsh Creek wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Geneva, NY. The operators at the Geneva plant have undertaken a long-term program to upgrade wastewater treatment processes and lower operating costs. The aging mechanical surface aerators at the Marsh Creek treatment plant were replaced by a state-of-the-art membrane panel system. This fine-bubble diffused air system offers higher oxygen transfer efficiency than surface aerators or other types of fine-bubble diffused-air systems. The project had four objectives: to decrease the amount of electricity used at the plant for aeration; to enable the plant`s existing aeration basins to accommodate higher organic loads and/or nitrify the wastewater should the need arise; to provide an even distribution of dissolved oxygen within the aeration basins to enhance biological wastewater treatment activity; and to provide technical data to assess the performance of the membrane panel system versus other forms of wastewater aeration.

NONE

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PEER REVIEW GUIDE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Based on a Survey of Best Practices for In-Progress Peer Review Prepared by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Peer Review Task Force August 2004 EERE PEER REVIEW GUIDE Acknowledgements DOE/EERE, and the Peer Review Task Force particularly, acknowledge the generous and important contributions to this Guide of Review Panel Chairman Ronald N. Kostoff, Office of Naval Research, and expert panel members and reviewers: Greg Stover, NASA; Paul Doremus, NIST; Richard Silberglitt, Rand; Kerry L. Dearfield, EPA; Jim Cassatt, NIH; Daryl Chubin, NACME; Fiona Wood, Australia; Frans van den Beemt, Netherlands; Larry James, DOE; and David Tratt, NASA. Notice This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

435

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers (TIO) serve as the principal DOE or NNSA office point of contact and assistant to, and liaison with, the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) that serves as the Department's office charged with the Scientific and Technical Information Program (STIP). The TIOs are to be familiar with the STI Programs within their Office they represent (given they have contracting financial assistance and/or acquisition activities) and for their major site/facility management contractor(s) STI Program to discern compliance with the DOE O 241.1B. They must maintain an up-to-date knowledge-base of the STI Program activities and provide timely feedback on issues as they emerge. While

436

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Provides requirements and responsibilities to ensure recruitment and hiring of technically capable personnel to retain critical technical capabilities within the Department at all times. Cancels DOE M 426.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 426.1.

2004-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

437

Interpreting new application scores and critiques Implementation of many of the Enhancements to Peer Review began with the May 2009 review meetings, and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to Peer Review began with the May 2009 review meetings, and applicants are receiving summary statements understanding of the basis of reviewer ratings, changes to the review and scoring process were created) of the overall impact/priority scores (1-9 in whole numbers only) given by all eligible review panel members

438

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to develop a proposed repository for the permanent disposal of such waste at Yucca Mountain in Nevada the DOE's methods of scientific and engineering analysis of the Yucca Mountain site. Those meetings This has been an eventful year for the Yucca Mountain program, during which important changes have been

439

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Energy in characterizing a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, as a possible location for a permanent to a decision by the Secretary of Energycurrently scheduled for 2001on whether to recommend the Yucca Mountain a clear description of how a Yucca Mountain repository would perform over thousands of years and how

440

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) activities related to evaluating the suitability of the Yucca Mountain site and takes a long-term view the DOE's viability assessment (VA) of the Yucca Mountain site, design of the repository and waste package considerable progress in characterizing the Yucca Mountain site. We also appreciate recent efforts by OCRWM

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Yucca Mountain in Nevada. The NWPAA also established the Board and charged it with evaluating the NWPA. The activities include characterizing the Yucca Mountain site and packaging and transporting of the repository block (ECRB) at Yucca Mountain. 1.3.2. Evaluate data from the drift-scale heater test. 1

442

SFEI Page 1 RMP Technical Review Committee  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(Attachment: Draft SC Minutes) 10:15 Meg Sedlak 3. Action: Special Study Proposals for 2012 The following) 4. Small Tributary Regional Loading (McKee) 5. Small Tributary Load Monitoring (McKee) 6. Small Follow up ­ Year 2 (Sedlak) Desired Outcome: Committee recommendation on package of special studies

443

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Versions are available for download August 1, 2007 Building C-400 Thermal Treatment 90% Remedial Design Report and Site Investigation Full Document and Summary Versions are...

444

Rediness Review Team Member Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEMBER MEMBER TRAINING Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Michael Hillman DOE HQ - HSS Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Dan M. Stover, PE Technical And Professional Services, Inc. 47 James Habersham Blvd Beaufort, SC 29906 Official DOE Team Member Readiness Review Training November 8-9, 2010 Module 1 Module 1 READINESS REVIEW TEAM MEMBER TRAINING Introduction & Course Conduct Readiness Review Readiness Review Official DOE Team Member Readiness Review Training November 2010 TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TEAM MEMBER TRAINING Purpose of this Course Provide Prospective Readiness Review Team members h with: * An understanding of the background behind the Readiness Review Process; e e ocess; * Training in the mechanics of performance and reporting of

445

Technical Standards Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Technical Standards Program (TSP) promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards by the Department of Energy (DOE), provides DOE with the means to develop needed technical standards, and manages overall technical standards information, activities, issues, and interactions. Cancels DOE O 1300.2A. Canceled by DOE O 252.1A

1999-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

446

Federal Technical Capability  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This directive defines requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Cancels DOE M 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

447

Technical Standards Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. Admin Chg 1 dated 3-12-13.

2011-02-23T23:59:59.000Z

448

E-Print Network 3.0 - activity technical progress Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Ensure that ... Source: U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Collection: Fission and Nuclear Technologies ; Environmental Management and Restoration Technologies 30 Pacific...

449

Ethics of private panels comes under scrutiny  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... [WASHINGTON]Private ethics boards set up to review experiments carried out mainly by pharmaceutical companies and medical ... of

Meredith Wadman

1997-05-29T23:59:59.000Z

450

Technical Cost Modeling - Life Cycle Analysis Basis for Program...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

1 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation lm001das2011o.pdf More Documents & Publications Technical Cost...

451

Cross-Laminated Timber Panels | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Laminated Timber Panels Laminated Timber Panels Jump to: navigation, search TODO: add page breaks/images Cross-Laminated Timer Panels are formed using planed "lamellas" (planed boards from 1" thick x 5"-7" wide) laid and glued using formaldehyde-free, food-grade glue in a vacuum press in alternate layers, at 90 degrees to each other, creating panels that are from 3 to 11 layers thick. These panels form a robust, structurally strong building system that outperforms anything currently available in the USA. Quality control is optimized with the pre-fabrication of the structural panels in an atmospherically controlled facility using computer controlled cutting equipment. State-of-the-art computer aided design programming is transferred directly to the manufacturing process. More information can

452

Solar Panels to Help Iowa Students Learn About Renewable Energy |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Panels to Help Iowa Students Learn About Renewable Energy Panels to Help Iowa Students Learn About Renewable Energy Solar Panels to Help Iowa Students Learn About Renewable Energy May 10, 2010 - 10:53am Addthis Five Iowa schools will receive rooftop solar panels this summer to help teach students about the technology | File Photo Five Iowa schools will receive rooftop solar panels this summer to help teach students about the technology | File Photo Stephen Graff Former Writer & editor for Energy Empowers, EERE Learning about the sun's power is just as important as harnessing it. New solar panels to be installed on the rooftops of five Iowa middle schools will give students hands-on experience with the technology and help offset some energy costs. "We really want this be an educational component to the schools'

453

SMART WATER GRID PLAN B TECHNICAL REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SMART WATER GRID PLAN B TECHNICAL REPORT FALL 2014 PREPARED BY: OLGA MARTYUSHEVA IN PARTIAL demand linked to the global population increase. A Smart Water Grid (SWG) is a two-way real time network, and others. A review of the benefits of Smart Water Grids is presented in the context of water conservation

Julien, Pierre Y.

454

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. Preliminary Review Copy FHWA/TX-03/1833-01-imp-1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date October 2002 4. Title Harrison Michael Bomba 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1833-01-imp-1 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)9

Texas at Austin, University of

455

Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee serves as an advisory body to the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) by providing support to their policy efforts aimed at ensuring the safe performance of hoisting and rigging activities at DOE facilities and in the review and resolution of identified generic hoisting and rigging safety issues.

456

FESAC Planning Panel Report to UFA: November 12, 2007 FESAC Planning Panel Final Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

· Martin Greenwald ­ Chair · Richard Callis · Bill Dorland · David Gates · Jeff Harris · Rulon Linford · Mike Mauel · Kathryn McCarthy Panel · Dale Meade · Farrokh Najmabadi · Bill Nevins · John Sarff · Mike

457

MELCOR Peer Review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Dhir, V.K. [Santa Monica, CA. (United States); Gieseke, J.A. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); Haste, T.J. [AEA Technology, Winfrith (United Kingdom); Kenton, M.A. [Gabor, Kenton and Associates, Inc., Westmont, IL (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research, Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Leonard, M.T. [Science Applications International Corp., Wolfheze (Netherlands); Viskanta, R. [Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN (United States). Heat Transfer Lab.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Gravitational waves: a foundational review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The standard linear approach to the gravitational waves theory is critically reviewed. Contrary to the prevalent understanding, it is pointed out that this theory contains many conceptual and technical obscure issues that require further analysis.

J. G. Pereira

2013-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

459

Dual circuit embossed sheet heat transfer panel  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A heat transfer panel provides redundant cooling for fusion reactors or the like environment requiring low-mass construction. Redundant cooling is provided by two independent cooling circuits, each circuit consisting of a series of channels joined to inlet and outlet headers. The panel comprises a welded joinder of two full-size and two much smaller partial-size sheets. The first full-size sheet is embossed to form first portions of channels for the first and second circuits, as well as a header for the first circuit. The second full-sized sheet is then laid over and welded to the first full-size sheet. The first and second partial-size sheets are then overlaid on separate portions of the second full-sized sheet, and are welded thereto. The first and second partial-sized sheets are embossed to form inlet and outlet headers, which communicate with channels of the second circuit through apertures formed in the second full-sized sheet. 6 figs.

Morgan, G.D.

1984-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

460

Compact x-ray source and panel  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A compact, self-contained x-ray source, and a compact x-ray source panel having a plurality of such x-ray sources arranged in a preferably broad-area pixelized array. Each x-ray source includes an electron source for producing an electron beam, an x-ray conversion target, and a multilayer insulator separating the electron source and the x-ray conversion target from each other. The multi-layer insulator preferably has a cylindrical configuration with a plurality of alternating insulator and conductor layers surrounding an acceleration channel leading from the electron source to the x-ray conversion target. A power source is connected to each x-ray source of the array to produce an accelerating gradient between the electron source and x-ray conversion target in any one or more of the x-ray sources independent of other x-ray sources in the array, so as to accelerate an electron beam towards the x-ray conversion target. The multilayer insulator enables relatively short separation distances between the electron source and the x-ray conversion target so that a thin panel is possible for compactness. This is due to the ability of the plurality of alternating insulator and conductor layers of the multilayer insulators to resist surface flashover when sufficiently high acceleration energies necessary for x-ray generation are supplied by the power source to the x-ray sources.

Sampayon, Stephen E. (Manteca, CA)

2008-02-12T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Solar panels as cosmic-ray detectors  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Due to fundamental limitations of accelerators, only cosmic rays can give access to centre-of- mass energies more than one order of magnitude above those reached at the LHC. In fact, extreme energy cosmic rays (1018 eV - 1020 eV) are the only possibility to explore the 100 TeV energy scale in the years to come. This leap by one order of magnitude gives a unique way to open new horizons: new families of particles, new physics scales, in-depth investigations of the Lorentz symmetries. However, the flux of cosmic rays decreases rapidly, being less than one particle per square kilometer per year above 1019 eV: one needs to sample large surfaces. A way to develop large-effective area, low cost, detectors, is to build a solar panel-based device which can be used in parallel for power generation and Cherenkov light detection. Using solar panels for Cherenkov light detection would combine power generation and a non-standard detection device.

Stella, Carlo; Assis, Pedro; Brogueira, Pedro; Santo, Catarina Espirito; Goncalves, Patricia; Pimenta, Mario; De Angelis, Alessandro

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

Digital Video Bandwidth Requirements for Large Flat-Panel Televisions  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Consumer expectations for high quality high-definition programming will place greater demand on access networks as flat-panel display sizes increase. Herein, we investigate the...

Ruffin, A B

463

Design and Analysis of Cooling Methods for Solar Panels.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??As the future progresses, many companies and industries are striving to achieve a "greener" approach to energy production by using solar energy. Solar panels that (more)

Palumbo, Adam M

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

FPGA Implementation of Multilayer Perceptron for Modeling of Photovoltaic panel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Number of electronic applications using artificial neural network-based solutions has increased considerably in the last few years. However, their applications in photovoltaic systems are very limited. This paper introduces the preliminary result of the modeling and simulation of photovoltaic panel based on neural network and VHDL-language. In fact, an experimental database of meteorological data (irradiation, temperature) and output electrical generation signals of the PV-panel (current and voltage) has been used in this study. The inputs of the ANN-PV-panel are the daily total irradiation and mean average temperature while the outputs are the current and voltage generated from the panel. Firstly, a dataset of 4x364 have been used for training the network. Subsequently, the neural network (MLP) corresponding to PV-panel is simulated using VHDL language based on the saved weights and bias of the network. Simulation results of the trained MLP-PV panel based on Matlab and VHDL are presented. The proposed PV-panel model based ANN and VHDL permit to evaluate the performance PV-panel using only the environmental factors and involves less computational efforts, and it can be used for predicting the output electrical energy from the PV-panel.

Mekki, H.; Belhout, K. [Department of Electronics, RASIC laboratory BLIDA UniversityBLIDA (Algeria); Mellit, A.; Salhi, H. [Department of Electronics, Control laboratory BLIDA UniversityBLIDA (Algeria)

2008-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

465

Smart panels with SISO or MIMO velocity feedback control systems  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper summarizes and contrasts the research work that has been carried out on two types of smart panels with ASAC control systems: first a SISO velocity feedback control system with a sensor that detects the volumetric component of the vibration of the panel and an actuator that exerts a uniform force over the surface of the panel and second a MIMO decentralized feedback control system using a grid of sensors that measure the point velocities of the panel and a grid of actuators that generates point excitations in the locations of the sensors. Both theoretical predictions and experimental results are presented for a reference problem of control of sound radiation by a rectangular panel clamped along the perimeter. The simulations carried out for the two systems have shown that the smart panel with the volume velocity sensor and uniform force actuator can in principle give better control performance than the smart panel with the sixteen decentralized control units. However the practical implementation of the smart panel with the volume velocity sensor and uniform force actuator is limited by stability problems which are instead a minor issue for the panel with 16 decentralized velocity feedback control units.

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Study of Alternative Approaches for Transite Panel Removal |...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

(BJC) assembled an experienced team from both sites to evaluate both the manual and mechanical methods of transite panel removal. Study of Alternative Approaches for Transite...

467

"Increasing Solar Panel Efficiency And Reliability By Evaporative...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Increasing Solar Panel Efficiency And Reliability By Evaporative Cooling" Inventors..--.. Lewis Meixler, Charles Gentile, Patricia Hillyer, Dylan Carpe, Jason Wang, Caroline Brooks...

468

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This project developed a new high-performance R-10/high SHGC window design, reviewed market positioning and evaluated manufacturing solutions required for broad market adoption. The project objectives were accomplished by: identifying viable technical solutions based on modeling of modern and potential coating stacks and IGU designs; development of new coating material sets for HM thin film stacks, as well as improved HM IGU designs to accept multiple layers of HM films; matching promising new coating designs with new HM IGU designs to demonstrate performance gains; and, in cooperation with a window manufacturer, assess the potential for high-volume manufacturing and cost efficiency of a HM-based R-10 window with improved solar heat gain characteristics. A broad view of available materials and design options was applied to achieve the desired improvements. Gated engineering methodologies were employed to guide the development process from concept generation to a window demonstration. The project determined that a slightly de-rated window performance allows formulation of a path to achieve the desired cost reductions to support end consumer adoption.

Stoessel, Chris

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

469

NREL: Technology Deployment - City and Community Technical Assistance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

City and Community Technical Assistance City and Community Technical Assistance NREL technical experts provide technical assistance to cities and communities to help identify and implement a variety of energy efficiency and renewable energy technology solutions. This includes: Greensburg, Kansas An International Inspiration for Green Disaster Recovery New Orleans, Louisiana Energy-Efficient Design Lessons Learned for K-12 Schools Project assistance Program, portfolio, and sustainable community design Request for proposals and performance contracting reviews State, local, federal, and financial policy analysis Strategic planning Trainings and workshops. Disaster Resiliency and Recovery NREL's comprehensive disaster resiliency and recovery program addresses the energy-related considerations of disaster prevention and planning, response

470

Development of plastic front side panels for green cars  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Lightweight design with thermoplastics is a robust approach in order to reduce the CO2 emission and fuel consumption. This paper reviews the role of plastics in the green concept of automobile and develops the design process for replacing steel front side panels, so called steel car fender, with plastic ones. Conceptual design, material selection, and design strategy in terms of strength, moldability, and assembility were proposed. Injection molding optimization was carried out in order to ensure the quality of the plastic fender under a certain manufacturing conditions such as the applied molding machine and auxiliary equipment. Prototype manufacturing was also implemented to verify the manufacturability and the feasibility of the development process of a plastic car fender. The weight of the plastic car fender is 1.15kg, reducing 41% compared to the steel fender. Although the production cost of the plastic fender is just slightly cheaper than that of steel one due to the high cost of the special plastic, the benefits such as lightweight, recyclability, manufacturability and design flexibility are the potential and practical application of the thermoplastic to the green automotive industry for making exterior parts.

H.S. Park; X.P. Dang; A. Roderburg; B. Nau

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

AGENDA for Review of NSTX 5 Year Plan for 2009-2013 July 28-30, 2008  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

AGENDA for Review of NSTX 5 Year Plan for 2009-2013 July 28-30, 2008 Conference Room LSB-B318, PPPL session) 1:30PM Chair, Panel Debriefing from 5-year plan review committee (open) 2:30PM Adjourn #12; Agenda and plan, panel member introduction 9:30AM Jon Menard Overview of NSTX Research Program for 2009

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

472

Energy Physics Advisory Panel met at Fermilab  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Charged with recommending how best to Charged with recommending how best to position the U.S. particle physics community for new facilities beyond CERN's Large Hadron Collider, a subpanel of the High- Energy Physics Advisory Panel met at Fermilab August 14-16 to hear presentations on such topics as the research agenda for Fermilab's Run II, the complicated upgrades to the CDF and DZero detectors and research on future accelerators. Volume 20 Friday, August 29, 1997 Number 17 Photo by Reidar Hahn HEPAP Looks into the Future HEPAP subpanel meets at Fermilab to chart the future of high-energy physics in the U.S. by Donald Sena and Sharon Butler, Office of Public Affairs In a letter to HEPAP, Martha Krebs, Director of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Research, directed the subpanel to "recommend a scenario for an

473

MEASUREMENT OF MIRROR PANELS USING COLOURED PATTERN DEFLECTOMETRY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and parabolic dish solar concentrators. Factory production of mirror panels also requires accurate measurementsMEASUREMENT OF MIRROR PANELS USING COLOURED PATTERN DEFLECTOMETRY Paul M. Scott1 , and Greg Burgess2 1 Research Assistant, Solar Thermal Group, Australian National University (ANU), Building 32 North

474

MACHINE LEARNING IN A DYNAMIC WORLD Panel Dmussion  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

MACHINE LEARNING IN A DYNAMIC WORLD Panel Dmussion Miecsyslaw M. Kohr Panel O&m and Editor. Michal~gi,George Mason University R.S.Sutton, GTE Laboratories Machine Learning was established of machine learning research was in Cybernetic Systems and Adaptive Control. Machine Learning has been

Antsaklis, Panos

475

Web Survey Technical Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Glisson,W.B. Welland,R.C. DCS Technical Report Series pp 27 Dept of Computing Science, University of Glasgow

Glisson, W.B.; Welland, R.C.

476

Ultrathin optical panel and a method of making an ultrathin optical panel  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

An ultrathin optical panel, and a method of producing an ultrathin optical panel, are disclosed, including stacking a plurality of glass sheets, which sheets may be coated with a transparent cladding substance or may be uncoated, fastening together the plurality of stacked coated glass sheets using an epoxy or ultraviolet adhesive, applying uniform pressure to the stack, curing the stack, sawing the stack to form an inlet face on a side of the stack and an outlet face on an opposed side of the stack, bonding a coupler to the inlet face of the stack, and fastening the stack, having the coupler bonded thereto, within a rectangular housing having an open front which is aligned with the outlet face, the rectangular housing having therein a light generator which is optically aligned with the coupler. The light generator is preferably placed parallel to and proximate with the inlet face, thereby allowing for a reduction in the depth of the housing.

Biscardi, Cyrus (Bellport, NY); Brewster, Calvin (North Patchogue, NY); DeSanto, Leonard (Patchogue, NY); Veligdan, James T. (Manorville, NY)

2001-10-09T23:59:59.000Z

477

Expert Panel: Forecast Future Demand for Medical Isotopes | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Expert Panel: Forecast Future Demand for Medical Isotopes Expert Panel: Forecast Future Demand for Medical Isotopes Expert Panel: Forecast Future Demand for Medical Isotopes The Expert Panel has concluded that the Department of Energy and National Institutes of Health must develop the capability to produce a diverse supply of radioisotopes for medical use in quantities sufficient to support research and clinical activities. Such a capability would prevent shortages of isotopes, reduce American dependence on foreign radionuclide sources and stimulate biomedical research. The expert panel recommends that the U.S. government build this capability around either a reactor, an accelerator or a combination of both technologies as long as isotopes for clinical and research applications can be supplied reliably, with diversity in adequate

478

Diversified Panels Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5346) | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Diversified Panels Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5346) Diversified Panels Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5346) Diversified Panels Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5346) February 21, 2013 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Diversified Panels Systems, Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE regulations require a manufacturer (which includes importers) to submit reports certifying that its products have been tested and meet the applicable energy conservation standards. This civil penalty notice advises the company of the potential penalties and DOE's administrative process, including the company's right to a hearing. Diversified Panels Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5346) More Documents & Publications

479

Memorandum, Safeguards & Security Policy Panels - February 15, 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Memorandum, Safeguards & Security Policy Panels - February 15, 2008 Memorandum, Safeguards & Security Policy Panels - February 15, 2008 Memorandum, Safeguards & Security Policy Panels - February 15, 2008 February 15, 2008 As outlined in the attached HSS memo, dated December 3,2007, subject: Safeguards and Security Policy Panels, the HSS Office of Security Policy is establishing several new policy panels that will create new opportunities for communication and will include those current active groups that are now effectively promoting cominunications in theirsafeguards and security topical areas. The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) recognizes the importance of well conceived strategies and policies to support and communicate the security posture of the Department. In order for our security policies to

480

Electrostatic cleaning system for removal of sand from solar panels  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract An improved cleaning system has been developed that uses electrostatic force to remove sand from the surface of solar panels. A single-phase high voltage is applied to parallel wire electrodes embedded in the cover glass plate of a solar panel. It has been demonstrated that more than 90% of the adhering sand is repelled from the surface of the slightly inclined panel after the cleaning operation. The performance of the system was further improved by improving the electrode configuration and introducing natural wind on the surface of the panel, even when the deposition of sand on the panel is extremely high. The power consumption of this system is virtually zero. This technology is expected to increase the effective efficiency of mega solar power plants constructed in deserts at low latitudes.

Hiroyuki Kawamoto; Takuya Shibata

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review panel" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Kingspan Insulated Panels: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5353) | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Kingspan Insulated Panels: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5353) Kingspan Insulated Panels: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5353) Kingspan Insulated Panels: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5353) March 26, 2013 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Kingspan Insulated Panels, Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE regulations require a manufacturer (which includes importers) to submit reports certifying that its products have been tested and meet the applicable energy conservation standards. This civil penalty notice advises the company of the potential penalties and DOE's administrative process, including the company's right to a hearing. Kingspan Insulated Panels: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5353) More Documents & Publications

482

Solar Panels Hit Energy Milestone For Potawatomi and Milwaukee | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Panels Hit Energy Milestone For Potawatomi and Milwaukee Panels Hit Energy Milestone For Potawatomi and Milwaukee Solar Panels Hit Energy Milestone For Potawatomi and Milwaukee October 26, 2011 - 10:44am Addthis The Forest County Potawatomi Tribe finishes installing solar panels on a Milwaukee, Wisconsin, administration building. | Photo courtesy of the Forest County Potawatomi Tribe The Forest County Potawatomi Tribe finishes installing solar panels on a Milwaukee, Wisconsin, administration building. | Photo courtesy of the Forest County Potawatomi Tribe Eric Escudero Eric Escudero Senior Public Affairs Specialist & Contractor, Golden Field Office "With the help of Recovery Act funding, clean energy projects across the county are creating skilled jobs, reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and saving consumers money on their energy bills."

483

September 14, 2010, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Face to Face meeting - NTC Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 14, 2010 September 14, 2010 September 14, 2010 September 14, 2010 September 14, 2010 Discussion Topics Discussion Topics p p * NTC Personnel Update * NTC Initiatives Update * Safety Training Program Update y g g p * Security Training Program Update 9/14/10 2 Personnel Updates and NTC Initiatives Personnel Updates and NTC Initiatives * Bob Nelson - Acting NTC Director g * Effective September 15, 2010 * NTC Strategic Planning * NTC Infrastructure (Facilities Automation * NTC Infrastructure (Facilities, Automation, etc.) * NTC Internal Process Improvements NTC Internal Process Improvements * NTC Curriculum Tracks 9/14/10 3 Safety Training Program Update Safety Training Program Update Update Update * FY10 Delivery Schedule y * 59 Total Iterations * 47 Off-site * 1093 students trained (as of 8/20/10) 1093 students trained (as of 8/20/10)

484

September 14, 2010, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel, Face to Face meeting … SSO Status Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

f f t S t O i ht Safety System Oversight Status Update Status Update Todd Lapointe Todd Lapointe Safety System Oversight Steering Committee U.S. Department of Energy September 2010 Overview Overview * Safety System Oversight Workshop May 2010 * Safety System Oversight Workshop, May 2010 - Combined SSO/FR Plenary Session - SSO Workshop Breakout - Program Implementation and - SSO Workshop Breakout - Program Implementation and Enhanced Communications * Safety System Oversight Steering Committee y y g g - Charter - Program Standard - Qualification Path - Other Initiatives/Challenges 2 SSO Workshop SSO Workshop * Combined SSO/FR Plenary Session * Combined SSO/FR Plenary Session - Workshop Keynote Address - Environmental Management Safety Assurance - Safety System Oversight Annual Award

485

September 14, 2010, Federal Technical Capabilities Panel Face to Face Meeting - Agenda  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Augusta Marriott Hotel Augusta Marriott Hotel Augusta, GA September 14, 2010 8:00 am - 5:00 pm 8:00-8:15 am Welcome Karen Boardman, FTCP Chair Jack Craig, Acting SRS Director 8:15-8:45 am FAQS Updates Ali Ghovanlou / Dave Chaney 8:45-9:15 am Expert Level Knowledge Competency Status Debbie Monette / Barry Weaver 9:15-9:45 am FTCP Metrics Karen Boardman 9:45-10:00 am Break 10:00-10:30 am NTC Activities Arnold Guevara 10:30-10:45 am SSO Workshop Update Todd Lapointe 10:45-11:30 am 2010 FTCP Operational Plan (Closeout) Karen Boardman * Goal 1--Identification of Value-Added Training Ali Ghovanlou/Robert Stallman and Linking to TQP Competencies * Goal 2--Accelerate and Expand Implementation of eTQP Allen Tate/Robert Hastings

486

DOE-STD-1179-2004; Technical Training Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9-2004 9-2004 February 2004 DOE STANDARD TECHNICAL TRAINING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1179-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1179-2004 ii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy managers

487

The U.S. Congress and The Secretary of Energy U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Report t The U.S. Congress and The Secretary of Energy U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Web site. #12;NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Dr. Jared L. Cohon, Chairman Carnegie Mellon. Debra S. Knopman Progressive Policy Institute Washington, D.C. Dr. Priscilla P. Nelson National Science

488

Negotiation-Collaboration in Formal Technical Giovana B. R. Linhares 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Negotiation-Collaboration in Formal Technical Reviews Giovana B. R. Linhares 1 , Marcos R. S discusses the negotiation-collaboration process: a binomial process mixing collaboration, negotiation and argumentation. We applied the negotiation-collaboration process to Formal Technical Reviews, commonly adopted

Antunes, Pedro

489

Microsoft PowerPoint - 15.1615_Cost Estimating Panel | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

615Cost Estimating Panel Microsoft PowerPoint - 15.1615Cost Estimating Panel Microsoft PowerPoint - 15.1615Cost Estimating Panel More Documents & Publications Contractor SOW...

490

A study on rigid foam/evacuated powder composite panels for thermal insulation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The present study investigates the feasibility of a composite panel: a series of individually evacuated panels incapsulated in a rigid closed cell foam matrix. The panels were encapsulated in a thin glass shee...

L. R. Glicksman; N. Solomou; J. K. Hong

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

E-Print Network 3.0 - agard avionics panel Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CHIPSat Spacecraft Design Significant Science on a Low Budget Summary: CHIPS E-box -Z-Y solar panel -Z+Y solar panel -X solar panel Magnetorquer 1 Bus avionics Reaction wheels......

492

MHD Integrated Topping Cycle Project. Eighteenth quarterly technical progress report, November 1, 1991--January 31, 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This eighteenth quarterly technical progress report of the MHD Integrated Topping cycle Project presents the accomplishments during the period November 1, 1991 to January 31, 1992. The precombustor is fully assembled. Manufacturing of all slagging stage components has been completed. All cooling panels were welded in place and the panel/shell gap was filled with RTV. Final combustor assembly is in progress. The low pressure cooling subsystem (LPCS) was delivered to the CDIF. Second stage brazing issues were resolved. The construction of the two anode power cabinets was completed.

Not Available

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel annual report, Fiscal year 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In Fiscal Year 1992, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (``the Panel``) handled 38 proceedings. The cases addressed issues in the construction, operation, and maintenance of commercial nuclear power reactors and other activities requiring a license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This reports sets out the Panel`s caseload during the year and summarizes, highlights, and analyzes how the wide-ranging issues raised in those proceedings were addressed by the Panel`s judges and licensing boards.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

494

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Federal Technical Capability Manual provides the process for the recruitment, deployment, development, and retention of Federal personnel with the demonstrated technical capability to safely accomplish the Departments missions and responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities. Canceled by DOE M 426.1-1A. Does not cancel other directives.

2000-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

495

About Technical Assistance  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

As technologies proceed along the development pipeline, most face major hurdles as they attempt to enter commercial markets. Our Technical Assistance program helps lower a range of institutional barriers to prepare innovative, energy-efficient technologies and energy management systems for full commercial deployment. These projects and activities address barriers that are not technical, Technology Readiness Level 9.

496

Depleted Uranium Technical Brief  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological healthDepleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air

497

Federal Technical Capability  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To define requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Chg. 1 dated 9-20-11 Cancels DOE O 426.1. Cancels DOE P 426.1.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

498

Technical College Buildings  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... should have such a paucity of literature dealing with material needs in the matter of buildings and equipment necessary for its field of activity. Books dealing with laboratories can be ... is therefore to be specially welcomed, particularly at the present time when the demands for buildings for technical education are so marked (London: Association of Technical Institutions and the Association ...

1935-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

499

POLICY FLASH 2014-25 Revision to the Procurement Strategy Panel...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

5 Revision to the Procurement Strategy Panel (PSP) Briefing Process POLICY FLASH 2014-25 Revision to the Procurement Strategy Panel (PSP) Briefing Process For DOE questions...

500

Report on Hydrogen Storage Panel Findings in DOE-BES Sponsored...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report on Hydrogen Storage Panel Findings in DOE-BES Sponsored Workshop on Basic Research for Hydrogen Production, Storage and Use Report on Hydrogen Storage Panel Findings in...