Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300 Arlington are pleased to transmit a technical report prepared by the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board. Based on its review of data gathered by the DOE and the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses

2

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

con202vf UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300, the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board) submits its second report of 2003 in accordance with provisions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987, Public Law 100-203. The Act requires the Board

3

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300 Arlington Dear Speaker Pelosi, Senator Byrd, and Secretary Bodman: The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, and transporting high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. The Board is required to report its findings

4

United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Experience Gained From Programs to Manage High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel in the United States and Other Countries A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy April 2011 #12;#12;U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Experience Gained From

5

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Board Review of OCRWM's Technical and Scientific Investigations. . . . . . . .9 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33 Idaho National Laboratory

6

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Report to The U.S. Congress And The Secretary of Energy January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2003 #12;U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Report to The U.nwtrb.gov, the NWTRB Web site. #12;#12;#12;NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD 2003 Dr. Michael L. Corradini

7

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Report to The U.S. Congressand The Secretary of Energy March 1, 2006­December 31, 2007 #12;#12;U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Report to The U in this report. #12;#12;#12;U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board B. John Garrick, Ph.D., P.E., Chairman

8

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the Board will focus include the technical implications of very long-term dry storage of commercial spent, facility operation and design, and waste storage and disposal. con266vf #12;con266vf 2 The Board to have responsibility under existing law for the long-term management and disposition of DOE-owned spent

9

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) characterization of a potential repository site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. In a December 11, 2001, letter to the Secretary and Congress on the DOE's technical and scientific work related to a decision on a Yucca Mountain's Yucca Mountain technical and scientific investigations since the Board's inception; (2) an evaluation

10

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD The U.S. Congress And The Secretary of Energy Report.nwtrb.gov, the NWTRB Web site. #12;#12;#12;NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Dr. Jared L. Cohon, Chairman Carnegie, California Dr. Debra S. Knopman Progressive Policy Institute Washington, D.C. Dr. Priscilla P. Nelson

11

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Report to January 1, 2001, to January 31, 2002 The U All NWTRB reports are available at www.nwtrb.gov, the NWTRB Web site. #12;#12;#12;NUCLEAR WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Appendices Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Members

12

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Evaluation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Addendum A Addendum A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Evaluation Fiscal Year 2005 The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act nuclear fuel and defense high-level radioactive waste. The Act also estab lished the U.S. Nuclear Waste

13

The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update...

14

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Members Appendix A 53  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

51 Appendix A Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Members #12;#12;Appendix A 53 B. John Garrick, Ph.D., P.E. Chairman Dr. B. John Garrick was appointed to the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review, on the U.S. Nuclear Regula- tory Commission's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste. His areas of expertise

15

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan FY 20082013  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on compliance activities, in conduct- ing its evaluation, the Board will encourage DOE through its science its review of DOE activities into three technical areas: preclosure operations, including surface-facility design and operations and the transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste from

16

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, Yucca Mountain in Nevada. The NWPAA also established the Board and charged it with evaluating the NWPA. The activities include characterizing the Yucca Mountain site and packaging and transporting of the repository block (ECRB) at Yucca Mountain. 1.3.2. Evaluate data from the drift-scale heater test. 1

17

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Fiscal Year 2002-2007 Strategic Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Appendix G Appendix G U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Fiscal Year 2002-2007 Strategic Plan Statement of the Chairman The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established of Energy Mission The Board's mission, established in the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act (NWPAA

18

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 20042009  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Appendix G Appendix G U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2004­2009 (Revised March 2004) Statement of the Board The Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 directed the U-level radioactive waste. The Act also established the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as an indepen dent

19

The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NWTRB NWTRB www.nwtrb.gov U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The U S Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update Presented to: National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Presented By: National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Mark Abkowitz May 11, 2011 The Board's Statutory Mandate * The 1987 amendments to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) established the U S Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board established the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. * The Board evaluates the technical and scientific validity of DOE activities related to: - transportation, packaging and storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) - site characterization, design, development, and operations of facilities for

20

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence with the Department of Energy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

85 Appendix E Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence with the Department of Energy #12;#12;Appendix E 87 Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence with the Department of Energy I n of Energy's (DOE) Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM). The letters typically provide

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Communication Between the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Appendix F Appendix F Communication Between the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board on Energy and Air Quality on March 25, 2004 143 #12;#12;Appendix F UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL much for your written questions related to my testimony on behalf of the Nuclear Waste Technical Review

22

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 I. Recommendation and Approval of the Yucca Mountain Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 II. The Board's Input Into the Process for Recommending and Approving the Yucca Mountain Site

23

Communication Between U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Document Manager, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office; July 2, 2001. Subject: Board comments on DOE supplement to the draft environmental impact statement for a geologic re- pository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada and Regulatory Compliance, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office; July 2, 2001. Subject: Board reaction

24

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Thermal-Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Thermal-Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain During the Preclosure and Postclosure Phases July 2008 #12;Thermal Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain July 2008 Page of the thermal response of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository for various thermal loadings. The U. S. Nuclear

25

Perspectives from the Board's Technical Staff  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from the Board's from the Board's Technical Staff AP Poloski, S Sircar, MW Dunlevy, F Bamdad, SA Stokes June 5, 2012 This presentation contains information collected by the Board's technical staff and no official support or endorsement of these remarks by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board is intended or should be inferred. Outline * Purpose: Review the values used by DOE contractors for dispersion analysis against DOE directives * Summary of Staff Complex-wide Review * Areas of Discussion - methods for determining atmospheric stability class; - use of extremely stable (G) atmospheric stability class; - selection of atmospheric dispersion coefficients; - correction for wind speed height; - selection of surface roughness; - adjusting dispersion coefficients due to surface roughness;

26

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 20042009  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to characterize one site, at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, to determine its behavior of a Yucca Mountain repository, (b) developing a reposi tory design, (c) reducing technical understanding of the potential behavior of a repository at Yucca Mountain, (b) developing a repository design

27

Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Appendices Appendices 31 #12;#12;Appendix A Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as Chairman on September 10, 2004, by President George W. Bush. Dr­2004), 4 years as chair, on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

28

APS Experiment Safety Review Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Charter for the APS Experiment Safety Review Board May 12, 2011 1. Purpose The APS Experiment Safety Review Board (ESRB) advises the AES Division Director on the safe implementation of experiments performed by APS users on the experiment hall floor. The ESRB reviews each experiment that is submitted to the APS via the APS Experiment Safety Assessment System (ESAF). These experiments are conducted in beamline endstations in the APS Experiment Hall. 2. Membership The ESRB members are appointed by the AES Division Director. The current members of the ESRB are: Bruce Glagola AES - Chair Edmund Chang AES Paul Rossi XSD Nena Moonier AES Tom Barkalow PSC Patricia Pedergnana AES Wendy VanWingeren AES 3. Method After an experiment is submitted to the APS Experiment Safety Review system

29

Technical Review Panel Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Evaluation and Identification of future R&D on eight Advanced Reactor Concepts, conducted April - September 2012 December 2012 Public release version 2 Public release version 3 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the Technical Review Panel Process ............................................................... 5 2. Technical Review Panel Criteria ......................................................................................... 6 3. Concept Summaries ........................................................................................................... 8

30

Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Appendices Appendices 37 #12;#12;Appendix A Appendix A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as chair, on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Commit tee on Nuclear Waste. His areas to the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board on June 26, 2002, by President George W. Bush. Dr. Abkowitz

31

External Technical Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

External Technical Review Report External Technical Review Report March 2010 U U . . S S . . D D e e p p a a r r t t m m e e n n t t o o f f E E n n e e r r g g y y O O f f f f i i c c e e o o f f E E n n v v i i r r o o n n m m e e n n t t a a l l M M a a n n a a g g e e m m e e n n t t External Technical Review (ETR) Process Guide September 2008 U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management September 2008 External Technical Review Process Guide Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose of Process ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background .........................................................................................................................

32

ORISE: Oak Ridge Sitewide Institutional Review Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oak Ridge Sitewide Institutional Review Board The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule, requires that each institution that engages in...

33

EPA - National Remedy Review Board webpage | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Review Board webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: EPA - National Remedy Review Board webpage Abstract This webpage provides...

34

Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review  

SciTech Connect

The Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review is published to inform readers of various technical activities within the Department, promote exchange of ideas, and give credit to personnel who are achieving the results. The report is presented in two parts: technical achievements and publication abstracts. The first is divided into seven sections, each of which reports on an engineering division and its specific activities related to nuclear tests, nuclear explosives, weapons, energy systems, engineering sciences, magnetic fusion, and materials fabrication.

Carr, R.B.; Denney, R.M. (eds.)

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

EM Reviews Budget, Technology Challenges with Advisory Board | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviews Budget, Technology Challenges with Advisory Board Reviews Budget, Technology Challenges with Advisory Board EM Reviews Budget, Technology Challenges with Advisory Board June 21, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Alice Williams, left, and EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga, center, talk with Environmental Management Advisory Board Vice-Chair Dennis Ferrigno at the recent board meeting. Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Alice Williams, left, and EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga, center, talk with Environmental Management Advisory Board Vice-Chair Dennis Ferrigno at the recent board meeting. AUGUSTA, Ga. - EM leadership met with the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) recently to discuss a range of topics, from EM's fiscal year 2014 budget request to its technology challenges.

36

January 20, 2006, Board letter forwarding DNFSB Technical Report 36,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

[DNFSB LETTERHEAD] [DNFSB LETTERHEAD] January 20, 2006 The Honorable Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-1000 Dear Secretary Bodman: In its response to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board’s (Board) Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Organizations, the Department of Energy (DOE) committed to revitalizing Integrated Safety Management (ISM) with “a set of actions the Department will pursue to re-confirm that ISM will be the foundation of the Department’s safety management approach and to address identified weaknesses in implementation”. The enclosed technical report, DNFSB/TECH-36, Integrated Safety Management: The Foundation for an Effective Safety Culture, provides an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the

37

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to develop a proposed repository for the permanent disposal of such waste at Yucca Mountain in Nevada the DOE's methods of scientific and engineering analysis of the Yucca Mountain site. Those meetings This has been an eventful year for the Yucca Mountain program, during which important changes have been

38

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Energy in characterizing a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, as a possible location for a permanent to a decision by the Secretary of Energycurrently scheduled for 2001on whether to recommend the Yucca Mountain a clear description of how a Yucca Mountain repository would perform over thousands of years and how

39

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) activities related to evaluating the suitability of the Yucca Mountain site and takes a long-term view the DOE's viability assessment (VA) of the Yucca Mountain site, design of the repository and waste package considerable progress in characterizing the Yucca Mountain site. We also appreciate recent efforts by OCRWM

40

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » Services » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download March 17, 2006 Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External Flowsheet Review Team (Technical) Report Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download previous 1 2 next Miscellaneous Supporting Information January 9, 2007 Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review August 10, 2006 Savannah River Site - Tank 48 Briefing on SRS Tank 48 Independent Technical Review August 10, 2006 Savannah River Site - Tank 48 Transmittal Letter of SRS Tank 48 Review

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Board Oversight of the DOE's Scientific and Technical Activities at Yucca Mountain  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Chapter 1 Board Oversight of the DOE's Scientific and Technical Activities at Yucca Mountain The DOE is characterizing Yucca Mountain in Nevada to evaluate the suitability of the site for con. In addi- tion, individual Board members attended DOE workshops and traveled to Yucca Mountain. I

42

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download September 1, 2011 Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 1, 2011 Compilation of ETR Summaries ETR Summaries from 2011 February 15, 2011 External Technical Review Report for Small Column Ion Exchange Technology at Savannah River Site Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 30, 2009 External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download June 30, 2009 Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of

43

Evaluation of the Technical Basis for Extended Dry Storage and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-- Executive Summary U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board December 2010 #12;U.S.U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Authors This report was prepared for the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.NWTRB.GOV ii #12;Extended Dry Storage and Transportation of Used Nuclear Fuel U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical

44

Institutional Review Board ... University of Missouri-Columbia  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Institutional Review Board . ... University of Missouri-Columbia . . Off -Site Research Effective: Cooperative Research Multiple Sites - Lead Site/Lead Investigator Off-Site - No Cooperative Institution at off-site locations or at multiple sites. 2.0 Scope GENERAL DESCRIPTION Off-site research activities

Noble, James S.

45

To: SJSU Students From: Student Evaluation Review Board (SERB)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

To: SJSU Students From: Student Evaluation Review Board (SERB) James Lee, CASA (Chair, IEA Chang Kim, H&A Mykel Jeffrey, Student Rachael French, Science Iris Quan, Business for Institutional Effectiveness & Analytics (IEA) Subject: Changes to Teaching Evaluation Policies ­ Spring

Eirinaki, Magdalini

46

Board on Earth Sciences and Resources and Its Activities -- Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect

The Board on Earth Sciences and Resources (BESR) provided oversight of the earth sciences and resources activities with the National Research Council (NRC). The Board reviewed research and public activities in the earth sciences; undertook analyses relevant to the discovery, supply, delivery, waste disposal and associated impacts and issues related to hydrocarbon, metallic, and nonmetallic mineral resources; and monitored the status of the earth sciences, assessed the health of the disciplines, identified research opportunities, and responded to specific agency requests for advice. These tasks were conducted by distinguished volunteers and NRC staff members that are representative of the breadth and depth of the earth sciences and resources disciplines (e.g., ecology, geophysics, geochemistry, geobiology, hydrology, geography, geographic information science, materials science, mineral resources and mining, energy resources, paleontology, visualization, remote sensing, geophysical data and information). Each year the Board held two meetings. Most recently at the May 2003 Board meeting, the main topic of discussion was Coordination of Geospatial Data in the Era of the Department of Homeland Security. Speakers were Steven Cooper, DHS; Barry Napier, FEMA; Bill Shinar, VGIN; Barbara Ryan, USGS; and Hank Garie, DOI. Other topics were Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources and New Opportunities in the Geology Discipline (Pat Leahy, USGS); Challenges to Understanding Biological Change in a Fluid Landscape (Sue Haseltine, USGS); and GIS and Remote Sensing at the USDA (Rodney Brown, USDA). The Board and the AGI also held a Leadership Forum. At the October 2003 Board meeting in Irvine, California, the Board plans to discuss earth resource issues, develop a white paper on the future directions of the Board, and review two of its standing committees--Committee on Seismology and Geodynamics, and the Committee on Geological and Geotechnical Engineering. The Board will also review the status of studies under way (e.g., Research Priorities--Earth Science and Medicine) and the status of studies under development (e.g., Understanding and Confronting Terrorism). As a result of the continuous strategic planning process, the Board and its standing committees have become more active as exemplified by the increasing number of ad hoc study committees and reports published during the last few years. The Board collaborated throughout the reporting period with several NRC units (e.g., National Materials Advisory Board, Ocean Studies Board, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, and the Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change). The Board provided oversight of the earth sciences and resources activities at the NRC. In particular, it provided oversight of its ad hoc and continuing activities. Under NRC guidelines, the Board holds its committees' study findings confidential until reports are published.

Anthony R. de Souza, Ph.D. Director, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources

2003-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

47

Hydrogen Storage Materials Requirements to Meet the 2017 On Board Hydrogen Storage Technical Targets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Materials Materials Requirements to Meet the 2017 On Board Hydrogen Storage Technical Targets Donald Anton Savannah River National Laboratory Troy Semelsberger Don Siegel Los Alamos National Laboratory University of Michigan Bruce Hardy Kriston Brooks Savannah River National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Materials Requirements Webinar June 25, 2013 2 Webinar Objective Give guidance to the materials development community as to the important materials characteristic for both adsorbent and chemical hydrides required to meet the DoE Technical Targets for Onboard Hydrogen Storage Systems This work has been fully funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, through the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office 3

48

2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Report is now available for download. The report provides a summary and compilation of expert, independent technical feedback on GTO-funded projects, as well as feedback from the Peer Review reviewers.

49

Report of the Independent Scientific Advisory Board Review of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Report of the Independent Scientific Advisory Board Review of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Program Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council and the National........................................................................................................... 11 POLICY CONTEXT FOR THE REVIEWS

50

Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report This report documents the establishment of a technical review process and the findings of the Advanced Reactor Concepts (ARC) Technical Review Panel (TRP).1 The intent of the process is to identify R&D needs for viable advanced reactor concepts in order to inform DOE-NE R&D investment decisions. A goal of the process is to facilitate greater engagement between DOE and industry. The process involved establishing evaluation criteria, conducting a pilot review, soliciting concept inputs from industry entities, reviewing the concepts by TRP members and compiling the results. The eight concepts received from industry spanned a range of reactor types

51

Communication Between U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Russell Dyer, Project Manager, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, to Jared L. Cohon; January 24, 2002. Subject: Fluid inclusions in mineral deposits at Yucca Mountain · Letter from Jared L. Cohon

52

Other U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of the Report `Thermochronological Evolution of Calcite Formation at the Potential Yucca Mountain Repository to Michael L. Corradini; November 25, 2003. Subject: Internal criticality risk at Yucca Mountain · Letter Evolution of Calcite Formation at the Potential Yucca Mountain Repository Site, Nevada." We do appreciate

53

U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B. Understanding Fundamental Corrosion Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 C of Multiple Lines of Evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 II. DOE Progress

54

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Correspondence with  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-management system. We look forward to learning more about TSM model components, structure, output metrics, underlying assumptions, and event uncertainties (e.g., weather events that may cause significant delays

55

Nuclear Waste Assessment System for Technical Evaluation (NUWASTE)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NWTRB NWTRB www.nwtrb.gov U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board: Roles and Priorities Presented by: Nigel Mote, Executive Director, U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board May 14, 2013 Hyatt Regency Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. Presented to: National Transportation Stakeholders' Forum NWTRB www.nwtrb.gov U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The Board's Statutory Mandate * The 1987 amendments to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) established the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. * The Board evaluates the technical and scientific validity of DOE activities related to implementing the NWPA, including: - transportation, packaging, and storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW)

56

December 14, 2004, Board letter providing Board Technical Report DNFSB/TECH-35, Safety Management of Complex, High-Hazard Organizations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Conwdy, Chalrmm 1 Conwdy, Chalrmm DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES , I SAFETY BOARD A J bggenberger, V i ~ e Charman John I Mansfield K Brucc lwdtthewa 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, D.C 20004-290 1 (202) 694-7000 December 14,2004 The Honorable Spencer Abraham Secretary of Energy 1 000 Independence Avenue, S W Washington, DC 20585- 1000 Dear Secretary Abraham: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) issued Recommendation 2004- I, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations, on May 2 1, 2004. On July 2 1,2004, the Department of Energy (DOE) accepted Recommendation 2004- 1 . The enclosed technical report, DNFSBITECH-35, Safety Management of Complex, High-Hazard Organizations, provides background information and ideas for implementing the Recommendation.

57

The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force to Support the Quadrennial Energy Review Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force to support the Quadrennial Energy Review Processis composed of SEAB members and independent experts, with experience in energy policy and...

58

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed...

59

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of independent, expert reviewers to determine the scientific technical feasibility of proposals submitted in response to government agency research needs. His team works closely with the federal government to provide liaison, consultation and operations support during the planning and execution of customers' grant management cycles. The

60

Advance Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Public Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Nuclear Energy supports research and development for advanced reactor technologies. This report documents the results of the 2014 Technical Review Panel (TRP) review of seven advanced reactor concepts. The intent of the process was to identify R&D needs for advanced reactor concepts in order to inform Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy R&D investment decisions.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Evaluation of System Level Modeling for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Summary - System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools for Hanford More Documents & Publications Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2009 System Planning for Low-Activity Waste at Hanford Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External

62

SFEI Page 1 RMP Technical Review Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Sedlak noted that the draft Triclosan fact sheet was developed in January 2011, and that additional fact Triclosan fact sheet is in the final stages of review, Mike Connor asked that the Steering Committee

63

THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY A non-technical review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, Distribution and Storage 11 Fuel Cells for Mobile and Stationary Uses 14 Carbon Capture and Storage 17-makers, environmental organisations, energy analysts and industry leaders that hydrogen is the fuel of the futureTHE HYDROGEN ECONOMY A non-technical review UNITEDNATIONSENVIRONMENTPROGRAMME #12;Copyright

64

E-Print Network 3.0 - activity technical progress Sample Search...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ensure that ... Source: U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Collection: Fission and Nuclear Technologies ; Environmental Management and Restoration Technologies 30 Pacific...

65

The four biomedical institutional review boards at Yale University, known as the Human Investigation Committee (HIC) I, HIC II, HIC III and HIC IV, seek representatives for  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The four biomedical institutional review boards at Yale University, known as the Human reviews all biomedical human subject research for its ethical soundness and regulatory compliance

66

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NNSS-2011-001 NNSS-2011-001 Site: Nevada National Security Site Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Review at the Nevada National Security Site Dates of Activity 02/14/2011 - 02/17/2011 Report Preparer William Macon Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), visited the Nevada Site Office (NSO) and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) from February 14-17, 2011. The purpose of the visit was to observe the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) review and maintain operational awareness of NNSS activities. Result:

67

Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Analysis Analysis Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analysis While both wet and dry storage have been shown to be safe options for storing used nuclear fuel (UNF), the focus of the program is on dry storage of commercial UNF at reactor or centralized locations. This report focuses on the knowledge gaps concerning extended storage identified in numerous domestic and international investigations and provides the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign"s (UFDC) gap description, any alternate gap descriptions, the rankings by the various organizations, evaluation of the priority assignment, and UFDC-recommended action based on the comparison. Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analysis More Documents & Publications

68

Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW November 22, 2006 Conducted by: Harry Harmon, Team Lead Civil/Structural Sub Team Facility Safety Sub Team Engineering Sub Team Peter Lowry, Lead James Langsted, Lead George Krauter, Lead Robert Kennedy Chuck Negin Art Etchells Les Youd Jerry Evatt Oliver Block Loring Wyllie Richard Stark Tim Adams Tom Anderson Todd LaPointe Stephen Gosselin Carl Costantino Norman Moreau Patrick Corcoran John Christian Ken Cooper Kari McDaniel _____________________________ Harry D. Harmon ITR Team Leader SPD-SWPF-217 SPD-SWPF-217: Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review 11/22/2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The ITR Team wishes to thank Shari Clifford of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for

69

The U.S. Congress and The Secretary of Energy U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Report t The U.S. Congress and The Secretary of Energy U.S. NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Web site. #12;NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Dr. Jared L. Cohon, Chairman Carnegie Mellon. Debra S. Knopman Progressive Policy Institute Washington, D.C. Dr. Priscilla P. Nelson National Science

70

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55 May 2011 July 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1

71

Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55 May 2011 July 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1

72

Type A Accident Investigation Board report on the January 17, 1996, electrical accident with injury in Technical Area 21 Tritium Science and Fabrication Facility Los Alamos National Laboratory. Final report  

SciTech Connect

An electrical accident was investigated in which a crafts person received serious injuries as a result of coming into contact with a 13.2 kilovolt (kV) electrical cable in the basement of Building 209 in Technical Area 21 (TA-21-209) in the Tritium Science and Fabrication Facility (TSFF) at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). In conducting its investigation, the Accident Investigation Board used various analytical techniques, including events and causal factor analysis, barrier analysis, change analysis, fault tree analysis, materials analysis, and root cause analysis. The board inspected the accident site, reviewed events surrounding the accident, conducted extensive interviews and document reviews, and performed causation analyses to determine the factors that contributed to the accident, including any management system deficiencies. Relevant management systems and factors that could have contributed to the accident were evaluated in accordance with the guiding principles of safety management identified by the Secretary of Energy in an October 1994 letter to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board and subsequently to Congress.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

Independent Oversight Review, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC- July 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project

74

Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Analyses Analyses Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analyses The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology, has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development activities related to storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The mission of the UFDC is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The Storage and Transportation activities within the UFDC are being developed to address issues regarding the extended storage of UNF and its subsequent

75

DOE-HDBK-1122-99 Radiological Control Technical Training, Oral Examination Boards Phase III, Part 8 of 9  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1122-99 ii This page intentionally left blank DOE-HDBK-1122-99 iii Course Developers William Egbert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dave Lent Coleman Research Michael McNaughton Los Alamos National Laboratory Bobby Oliver Lockheed Martin Energy Systems Richard Cooke Argonne National Laboratory Brian Thomson Sandia National Laboratory Michael McGough Westinghouse Savannah River Company Brian Killand Fluor Daniel Hanford Corporation Course Reviewers Technical Standards Managers U.S. Department of Energy Peter O'Connell U.S. Department of Energy William D. Ulicny ATL International, Inc. DOE-HDBK-1122-99

76

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

* The Board advises Ecology to make past versions of the Permit available for public review to promote Permit comparisons. * The Board advises Ecology to explicitly reserve...

77

TECHNICAL REVIEW B January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2004  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Administrative & Support Staff Linda Coultry Program Management Specialist Alvina Hayes Administrative Assistant Linda L. Hiatt Management Analyst Victoria F. Reich Librarian vi #12;Table of Contents Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 IV. The Board in Transition

78

Technical Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review for Technical Standards of Interest Legend: Red Technical Standards Program Activities and Responsibilities Blue Directives Program Activities and Responsibilities...

79

FISH PASSAGE CENTER OVERSIGHT BOARD Meeting Notes for October 15, 2007 Missoula, Montana  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. For example, if the FPC did 300 technical analyses in a year, could the Board do a Quality Assurance/Quality to become a full-fledged member of the Board, instead of an ex-officio member. Discussion of Operating Rules of operating rules to govern its activities. The group agreed that was a good idea and proceeded to review

80

2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Provided in three sections, this comprehensive technical report assesses 100 projects in the GTO portfolio, based on presentations from GTO-funded principal investigators that were evaluated and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Human Ethics -Last updated Dec. 12, 2007 Research involving human participants must be reviewed by an Ethics Board before it can  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Human Ethics - Last updated Dec. 12, 2007 Research involving human participants must be reviewed by an Ethics Board before it can commence. The job of the Ethics Board is to think about the proposed research about how to do research. The University through the Office of Research Services (ORS) (http://www.mcmaster.ca/ors/ethics

Haykin, Simon

82

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact 202-586-4940 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment

83

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:15pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment facility that contain tanks and piping. Due to high levels of

84

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact 202-586-4940 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment

85

Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Review to Assess Black Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:15pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility's "black cells." The review involves the plant's capability, as designed, to detect equipment failure and to repair failed equipment inside the WTP's black cells. Black cells are enclosed concrete rooms within the WTP Pretreatment facility that contain tanks and piping. Due to high levels of

86

L1:PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review Andrew Godfrey ORNL Completed: June 25, 2013 CASL- -2013-01 -000 Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs Consortium...

87

Technical, Economical, and Climate-Related Aspects of Biochar Production Technologies: A Literature Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Technical, Economical, and Climate-Related Aspects of Biochar Production Technologies: A Literature Review ... Bioenergy Unit, Ecofys, 81243 Mnchen, Germany ... For this reason, this paper summarizes the available peer-reviewed scientific literature (ISI Web of Knowledge) about the technological, economical, and climate-relevant aspects of carbonization technologies. ...

Sebastian Meyer; Bruno Glaser; Peter Quicker

2011-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

88

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Advisory Board Page 7 Final Meeting Summary March 4, 2010 External independent review team summary of observations and conclusions in regard to HAB advice to DOE * The...

89

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan for FY 2001-2006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

undertaken by the Secretary of Energy, including characterizing a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for its credibility of the Secretary of Energy's efforts to characterize the Yucca Mountain site for its suitability--related to the Secretary's efforts to char- acterize the Yucca Mountain site or to package and transport spent nuclear fuel

90

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 20032008  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Energy (DOE) to characterize one site, at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, to determine its suitability for constructing a repository at Yucca Mountain. As a result, the DOE plans to prepare and submit an application) gaining a better understanding of the potential behavior of a Yucca Mountain repository; (b) developing

91

Software Sensitivity Review | Scientific and Technical Information Program  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Sensitivity Review Sensitivity Review Print page Print page Email page Email page As required by DOE O 241.1B, software submitting sites are to review all software for classified and controlled unclassified information, including Personally Identifiable Information (PII), according to approved local procedures. Prior to announcing and/or submitting software to ESTSC or a SIAC, or disseminating software publicly, the submitting site should conduct reviews to determine the appropriate Intellectual Property or other category of sensitivity. Those categories include: Unlimited Announcement - Software which be made available to all requesters; government, public and foreign (sensitive countries require Headquarters approval). Open Source Software - Computer software that is distributed under a

92

The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board evaluates the technical and scientific validity of ac-  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and scientific validity of ac- tivities undertaken by the Secretary of Energy to characterize Yucca Mountain) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF). The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) began studying Yucca Mountain features of Yucca Moun- tain led to its selection as a potential repository site: · Yucca Mountain now

93

SurfBoard --A Hardware Performance Monitor for SHRIMP Princeton University Technical Report TR--596--99  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

is based on a hardware performance monitor which combines several features including multi­dimensional. Demonstrated in the case studies is the direct measurement of an implicit form of interprocessor communication to measure all communication with minimal impact to the system. Additionally, the SurfBoard provides several

94

Independent Technical Review of In-Tank Precipitation (ITP) at the Savannah River Site  

SciTech Connect

An Independent Technical Review of In-Tank Precipitation (ITP) and Extended Sludge Processing (ESP) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) was carried out in March, 1993. The review focused on ITP/ESP equipment and chemical processes, integration of ITP/ESP within the High Level Waste (HLW) and Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) systems, and management and regulatory concerns. Following the ITR executive summary, this report includes: Chapter I--summary assessment; Chapter II--recommendations; and Chapter III--technical evaluations.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the Board to review the permits, but there will be at least a 120-day comment period for review. Jane said that on a personal note, she thinks the state budget is woeful. She said...

96

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Agency (EPA), said EPA recently had a very good meeting with the National Remedy Review Board, who visited Hanford to review the 300 Area, K Area, and Unit Process One...

97

Hydrogen Storage Materials Requirements to Meet the 2017 On Board...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Storage Materials Requirements to Meet the 2017 On Board Hydrogen Storage Technical Targets Hydrogen Storage Materials Requirements to Meet the 2017 On Board Hydrogen Storage...

98

Technical issues related to NUREG 0800, Chapter 18: Human Factors Engineering/Standard Review Plan  

SciTech Connect

The revision of Chapter 18 of NUREG 0800, Human Factors Engineering Standard Review Plan (SRP) will be based on SECY 82-111 and guidance contained in NUREG 0700, NUREG 0801 and NUREG 0835, plus other references. In conducting field reviews of control rooms, the NRC has identified technical issues which can be used to enhance the development of the revised version of NUREG 0800, and to establish priorities among the list of possible Branch Technical Positions (BTP) in NUREG 0800, Rev. 0, Table 18.0-2. This report is a compilation of comments and suggestions from the people who used NUREG 0700 in the Control Room field reviews. This information was used to establish possible BTP topic priorities so that the most important BTPs could be issued first. The comments and suggestions are included for HFEB review in conjunction with the table of priorities.

Savage, J.W.

1982-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

99

A Technical Review of Interference Testing with Application in the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Program under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AT03-80SF11459 and by the Department of Petroleum.S.I.R., Wellington. Financial support was provided by M.W.D., New Zealand Energy Department, Stanford Geoth- ermal testing and relatdd earth tide arid compressibility effects are reviewed. Hydrological information from

Stanford University

100

Board Staff Perspectives Quality Council  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear Facilities Safety Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Th B d & T h i l S ff Q li A The Board & Technical Staff Quality Assurance Perspectives for 2011 2010 Dr. W. San Horton, PMP, CSQE Member of the Technical Staff Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board DISCLAIMER The ie s and opinions presented are solel the a thor's No information contained in the presentation nor an associated The views and opinions presented are solely the author's. No information contained in the presentation nor any associated discussion should be construed as official or unofficial views or positions of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board T i Topics B i I f ti B d * Basic Information on Board * Who, what, mission, size, location * Organization of the Board and the Board's staff

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

May 15, 2012, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting … Speech: Safety Culture And Training and Competency  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Safety Culture Safety Culture And Training and Competency Joseph F. Bader Board Member Board Member Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Thanks to Tim Hunt and Doug Minnema Objectives * Discuss the Board's approach to staff training * Review the Board's concerns about safety culture at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) * Understand what group culture is and why it is an g p y important part of nuclear operations * Explore the linkage between safety culture and training and competency June 2012 DOE FTCP Meeting 2 The Board's Technical Staff * Currently about 85 Technical Staff members. * Essentially all of the Technical Staff members have at least one technical master's degree, ~20% have a PhD. * Extensive experience in nuclear, mechanical, electrical,

102

Is Conflict of Interest Becoming a Challenge for Institution-Based Institutional Review Boards?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Existing and Revised Regulatory Structure for...COIC)] must review and act accordingly...and objective review process. Although...with management plans (typically orchestrated...during its regular review of human subject...have no federal regulatory definitions and...Management plans should be formulated...

Ralph S. Freedman and Ross McKinney, Jr

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Industrial Energy Efficiency Technical Review Guidelines and Best Practices  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of commercial and other sector programs. The following programs were deemed to represent the best combination of applicability and access to relevant information: ? BC Hydro?s Power Smart Partners - Industrial (Transmission and Distribution...) ? Wisconsin?s Focus on Energy ? Industrial ? California Public Utilities Commission?s (CPUC) Southern California Industrial and Agricultural (SCIA) and Pacific Gas & Electric?s (PG&E) Fabrication, Process and Manufacturing Review of Impact Evaluation...

Dalziel, N.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Reviewing PSA-based analyses to modify technical specifications at nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect

Changes to Technical Specifications (TSs) at nuclear power plants (NPPs) require review and approval by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). Currently, many requests for changes to TSs use analyses that are based on a plant`s probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). This report presents an approach to reviewing such PSA-based submittals for changes to TSs. We discuss the basic objectives of reviewing a PSA-based submittal to modify NPP TSs; the methodology of reviewing a TS submittal, and the differing roles of a PSA review, a PSA Computer Code review, and a review of a TS submittal. To illustrate this approach, we discuss our review of changes to allowed outage time (AOT) and surveillance test interval (STI) in the TS for the South Texas Project Nuclear Generating Station. Based on this experience gained, a check-list of items is given for future reviewers; it can be used to verify that the submittal contains sufficient information, and also that the review has addressed the relevant issues. Finally, recommended steps in the review process and the expected findings of each step are discussed.

Samanta, P.K.; Martinez-Guridi, G. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Vesely, W.E. [Science Applications International Corporation, Dublin, OH (United States)

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

2006-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

106

Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. This SRP (hereafter refers to as the Engineering SRP) provides consistent review guidance to assure that engineering and technical requirements are appropriately applied for the design, operations and disposition2 of DOE nuclear facilities. It is one of a series of three SRPs developed by the CNS. The other two SRPs address: 1) nuclear safety basis program review; and 2) application of requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, for DOE Critical Decision (CD) review and approval. These SRPs may be revised in the future to reflect changes in the DOE requirements, lessons learned, and experience/insights from nuclear facility design, operations, and disposition.

107

The American Board of Radiology Holman Research Pathway: 10-Year Retrospective Review of the Program and Participant Performance  

SciTech Connect

Introduction: In 1999, the American Board of Radiology (ABR) implemented an innovative training program track in diagnostic radiology (DR) and radiation oncology (RO) designed to stimulate development of a cadre of future academic researchers and educators in the 2 disciplines. The program was designated the Holman Research Pathway (HRP). An in-depth retrospective review of initial certification examination performance, post-training career choices, and academic productivity has not been written. This report represents a 10-year retrospective review of post-training performance of a cohort of trainees who have had sufficient time to complete their training and initial certification process and to enter practice. Methods and Materials: All pertinent proceedings of the ABR and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Residency Review Committees for DR and RO between 1997 and May 2011 were reviewed. Thirty-four HRP candidates who fulfilled the established evaluation criteria were identified, and their ABR data files were analyzed regarding performance on the qualifying and certifying examinations. All candidates were contacted directly to obtain a current curriculum vitae. Results: Twenty candidates in RO and 14 candidates in DR were identifiable for review. All candidates attained initial certification. At the time of analysis, 23 of 33 (66.6%) candidates were employed in full-time academic practice (1 DR candidate remained in a fellowship and was not evaluated regarding employment status). Fifteen of 20 (75%) RO candidates were in faculty positions compared with 7 of 13 (53.8%) DR trainees. Additional academic productivity metrics are reported. Conclusions: A high percentage of HRP trainees remained in academic practice and demonstrated significant academic productivity as measured by manuscript authorship and research support. Additional time and observation will be needed to determine whether these findings will be sustained by past, current, and future HRP trainees.

Wallner, Paul E., E-mail: pwallner@theabr.org [21st Century Oncology, LLC, Fort Myers, Florida, and American Board of Radiology, Tucson, Arizona (United States); Ang, K. Kian [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)] [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States); Zietman, Anthony L. [Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)] [Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States); Harris, Jay R. [Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)] [Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (United States); Ibbott, Geoffrey S. [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)] [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States); Mahoney, Mary C. [University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States)] [University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States); Mezwa, Duane G. [Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oaks, Michigan (United States)] [Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oaks, Michigan (United States); Wilson, Lynn D. [Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (United States)] [Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (United States); Becker, Gary J. [American Board of Radiology, Tucson, Arizona (United States)] [American Board of Radiology, Tucson, Arizona (United States)

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (Documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 1996 February 1996 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 Date November 2005 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS DOCUMENTS (DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES AND TECHNICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS) U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, Fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Adminis tration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

109

Board seeks major changes in DOE`s Yucca Mountain Program  

SciTech Connect

Seeking to keep the heat on the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board urged the department to make several fundamental changes in its high level radioactive waste program. In particular, the board said DOE currently directs too much funding toward overhead and infrastructure and not enough to on-site characterization activities. In addition to these changes, the board called on O`Leary to convene an independent review of the waste program`s management and organizational structure. Such a review, which the board said would complement the secretary`s current financial review of the program, is particularly important in light of the department`s proposal to boost funding for the program in fiscal 1995.

Wamsted, D.

1994-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

110

Technical Review of Retrieval and Closure Plans for the INEEL INTEC Tank Farm Facility  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this report is to document the conclusions of a technical review of retrieval and closure plans for the Idaho National Energy and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) Tank Farm Facility. In addition to reviewing retrieval and closure plans for these tanks, the review process served as an information exchange mechanism so that staff in the INEEL High Level Waste (HLW) Program could become more familiar with retrieval and closure approaches that have been completed or are planned for underground storage tanks at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Hanford sites. This review focused not only on evaluation of the technical feasibility and appropriateness of the approach selected by INEEL but also on technology gaps that could be addressed through utilization of technologies or performance data available at other DOE sites and in the private sector. The reviewers, Judith Bamberger of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Dr. Barry Burks of The Providence Group Applied Technology, have extensive experience in the development and application of tank waste retrieval technologies for nuclear waste remediation.

Bamberger, Judith A; Burks, Barry L; Quigley, Keith D; Falter, Diedre D

2001-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

111

Is Conflict of Interest Becoming a Challenge for Institution-Based Institutional Review Boards?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...treatment. We also discuss the process involved in the first review...into the protocol development process are presented. Clin Cancer...why sale does not constitute commercialization 10. Please note that an environmental...pertinent to the pre-IDE and IDE process. Figure 2. Comparison of...

Ralph S. Freedman and Ross McKinney, Jr

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Policies for the Telescope Time Review Board (TTRB): Repeating HST Observations, Changes to  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

in use of HST or a conflict of data rights. 1. The Process for Reviewing Program Changes Changes, but that is not important here. GTO time can be considered a special case of #1 since GTO observations are planned in Cycles

Sirianni, Marco

113

Report on the Software Environments Technical Research Review Jerey J. Blevins, E. James Whitehead, Jr., and Harry E. Yessayan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, Jr., and Harry E. Yessayan organized by: Leon J. Osterweil and Richard N. Taylor Irvine Research UnitReport on the Software Environments Technical Research Review Jerey J. Blevins, E. James Whitehead

Whitehead, James

114

Savannah River Site - Tank 48 Briefing on SRS Tank 48 Independent Technical Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tank 48 Tank 48 Independent Technical Review August 2006 2 SRS Tank 48 ITR SRS Tank 48 ITR Key ITR Observation Two distinct problems: Removing tetraphenylborate (TPB) waste and then cleaning the tank sufficiently to support return to service Processing contents to eliminate TPB hazard August 2006 3 SRS Tank 48 ITR SRS Tank 48 ITR Overarching ITR Conclusions 1. TPB Processing is on the right track - DOE/WSRC have selected the most promising candidates - Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (FBSR) is the most technically attractive and mature of the candidate processes August 2006 4 SRS Tank 48 ITR SRS Tank 48 ITR Overarching Conclusions (continued) 2. Heel removal and tank cleanout will be a very challenging task. Compounding issues: - Physical difficulties in cleanout (access, congestion, etc.)

115

Technical Letter Report: Evaluation and Analysis of a Few International Periodic Safety Review Summary Reports  

SciTech Connect

At the request of the United States (U.S.) government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assembled a team of 20 senior safety experts to review the regulatory framework for the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States. This review focused on the effectiveness of the regulatory functions implemented by the NRC and on its commitment to nuclear safety and continuous improvement. One suggestion resulting from that review was that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) incorporate lessons learned from periodic safety reviews (PSRs) performed in other countries as an input to the NRCs assessment processes. In the U.S., commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) are granted an initial 40-year operating license, which may be renewed for additional 20-year periods, subject to complying with regulatory requirements. The NRC has established a framework through its inspection, and operational experience processes to ensure the safe operation of licensed nuclear facilities on an ongoing basis. In contrast, most other countries do not impose a specific time limit on the operating licenses for NPPs, they instead require that the utility operating the plant perform PSRs, typically at approximately 10-year intervals, to assure continued safe operation until the next assessment. The staff contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) to perform a pilot review of selected translated PSR assessment reports and related documentation from foreign nuclear regulatory authorities to identify any potential new regulatory insights regarding license renewal-related topics and NPP operating experience (OpE). A total of 14 PSR assessment documents from 9 countries were reviewed. For all of the countries except France, individual reports were provided for each of the plants reviewed. In the case of France, three reports were provided that reviewed the performance assessment of thirty-four 900-MWe reactors of similar design commissioned between 1978 and 1988. All of the reports reviewed were the regulators assessment of the PSR findings rather than the original PSR report, and all but one were English translations from the original language. In these reviews, it was found that most of the countries base their regulatory guidance to some extent (and often to a large extent) on U.S. design codes and standards, NRC regulatory guidance, and U.S. industry guidance. In addition, many of the observed operational technical issues and OpE events reported for U.S. reactors are also cited in the PSR reports. The PSR reports also identified a number of potential technical material/component performance issues and OpE events that are not commonly reported for U.S. plants.

Chopra, Omesh K. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Diercks, Dwight R. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Nuclear Engineering Division; Ma, David Chia-Chiun [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Garud, Yogendra S. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division

2013-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

116

Type A Accident Investigation Board Report on the July 11, 1996, Electrical Shock at Technical Area 53, Building MPF-14, Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report is an independent product of an electrical shock accident investigation board appointed by Bruce G. Twining, Manager, Albuquerque Operations Office, Department of Energy.

117

Type B Accident Investigation Board Report on the November 17, 1997, Chiller Line Rupture at Technical Area 35, Building 27, Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report is a product of an accident investigation board appointed by Bruce G. Twining, Manager, Albuquerque Operations Office, Department of Energy.

118

A Technical Review on Biomass Processing: Densification, Preprocessing, Modeling and Optimization  

SciTech Connect

It is now a well-acclaimed fact that burning fossil fuels and deforestation are major contributors to climate change. Biomass from plants can serve as an alternative renewable and carbon-neutral raw material for the production of bioenergy. Low densities of 4060 kg/m3 for lignocellulosic and 200400 kg/m3 for woody biomass limits their application for energy purposes. Prior to use in energy applications these materials need to be densified. The densified biomass can have bulk densities over 10 times the raw material helping to significantly reduce technical limitations associated with storage, loading and transportation. Pelleting, briquetting, or extrusion processing are commonly used methods for densification. The aim of the present research is to develop a comprehensive review of biomass processing that includes densification, preprocessing, modeling and optimization. The specific objective include carrying out a technical review on (a) mechanisms of particle bonding during densification; (b) methods of densification including extrusion, briquetting, pelleting, and agglomeration; (c) effects of process and feedstock variables and biomass biochemical composition on the densification (d) effects of preprocessing such as grinding, preheating, steam explosion, and torrefaction on biomass quality and binding characteristics; (e) models for understanding the compression characteristics; and (f) procedures for response surface modeling and optimization.

Jaya Shankar Tumuluru; Christopher T. Wright

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

Review of Technical Studies in the United States in Support of Burnup Credit Regulatory Guidance  

SciTech Connect

Taking credit for the reduction in reactivity associated with fuel depletion can enable more cost-effective, higher-density storage, transport, disposal, and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) while maintaining sufficient subcritical margin to establish an adequate safety basis. Consequently, there continues to be considerable interest in the United States (U.S.), as well as internationally, in the increased use of burnup credit in SNF operations, particularly related to storage, transport, and disposal of commercial SNF. This interest has motivated numerous technical studies related to the application of burnup credit, both domestically and internationally, as well as the design of SNF storage, transport and disposal systems that rely on burnup credit for maintaining subcriticality. Responding to industry requests and needs, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated a burnup credit research program in 1999, with support from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to develop regulatory guidance and the supporting technical bases for allowing and expanding the use of burnup credit in pressurized-water reactor SNF storage and transport applications. Although this NRC research program has not been continuous since its inception, considerable progress has been achieved in many key areas in terms of increased understanding of relevant phenomena and issues, availability of relevant information and data, and subsequently updated regulatory guidance for expanded use of burnup credit. This paper reviews technical studies performed by ORNL for the U.S. NRC burnup credit research program. Examples of topics include reactivity effects associated with reactor operating characteristics, fuel assembly characteristics, burnable absorbers, control rods, spatial burnup distributions, cooling time, and assembly misloading; methods and data for validation of isotopic composition predictions; methods and data for validation of criticality calculations; and operational issues and data related to assembly burnup confirmation. The objective of this paper is to summarize the work and significant accomplishments, with references to the technical reports and publications for complete details, and provide a useful resource to others in the burnup credit community.

Wagner, John C [ORNL] [ORNL; Parks, Cecil V [ORNL] [ORNL; Mueller, Don [ORNL] [ORNL; Gauld, Ian C [ORNL] [ORNL

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

The Awareness, Perceptions and Attitudes of Faculty Users and Faculty Non-Users about the Role and Processes of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at One 1890 Land Grant Institution  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

THE AWARENESS, PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF FACULTY USERS AND FACULTY NON-USERS ABOUT THE ROLE AND PROCESSES OF THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) AT ONE 1890 LAND GRANT INSTITUTION A Dissertation by MARCIA COLLINS SHELTON... AND ATTITUDES OF FACULTY USERS AND FACULTY NON-USERS ABOUT THE ROLE AND PROCESSES OF THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) AT ONE 1890 LAND GRANT INSTITUTION DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by MARCIA COLLINS SHELTON Submitted to the Office of Graduate...

Shelton, Marcia Collins

2010-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

board | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

board board Dataset Summary Description The Alabama State Oil and Gas Board publishes well record permits to the public as they are approved. This dataset is comprised of 50 recent well record permits from 2/9/11 - 3/18/11. The dataset lists the well name, county, operator, field, and date approved, among other fields. State's make oil and gas data publicly available for a range of topics. Source Geological Survey of Alabama Date Released February 09th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated March 18th, 2011 (3 years ago) Keywords Alabama board gas oil state well records Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon Well records 2/9/11 - 3/18/11 (xls, 28.7 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Attribution License

122

Review of technical documents supporting proposed revisions to EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(D) of the Clean Water Act. Final report  

SciTech Connect

In August 1985 the Environmental Engineering Committee of the Science Advisory Board was asked by the Office of Water Regulations and Standards (OWRS) to review technical documents supporting development of EPA regulations for the disposal/reuse of sewage sludge under Section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act. The Committee was also asked by the Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (OMEP) to review technical documents supporting revisions of the EPA ocean dumping regulations. The Committee chose to review the two sets of documents together, since they both dealt with a common subject, and since they shared, in some respects, a common methodology. The report, however, covers only the review of the OWRS documents, which consist of a set of risk-assessment methodologies (1,2,3,4) for four sludge disposal/reuse options (landfilling, land application/distribution and marketing, incineration, and ocean disposal). The reviews of the OMEP documents are covered in separate Committee reports. The Committee's principal findings are outlined.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Human-system Interfaces to Automatic Systems: Review Guidance and Technical Basis  

SciTech Connect

Automation has become ubiquitous in modern complex systems and commercial nuclear power plants are no exception. Beyond the control of plant functions and systems, automation is applied to a wide range of additional functions including monitoring and detection, situation assessment, response planning, response implementation, and interface management. Automation has become a 'team player' supporting plant personnel in nearly all aspects of plant operation. In light of the increasing use and importance of automation in new and future plants, guidance is needed to enable the NRC staff to conduct safety reviews of the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of modern automation. The objective of the research described in this report was to develop guidance for reviewing the operator's interface with automation. We first developed a characterization of the important HFE aspects of automation based on how it is implemented in current systems. The characterization included five dimensions: Level of automation, function of automation, modes of automation, flexibility of allocation, and reliability of automation. Next, we reviewed literature pertaining to the effects of these aspects of automation on human performance and the design of human-system interfaces (HSIs) for automation. Then, we used the technical basis established by the literature to develop design review guidance. The guidance is divided into the following seven topics: Automation displays, interaction and control, automation modes, automation levels, adaptive automation, error tolerance and failure management, and HSI integration. In addition, we identified insights into the automaton design process, operator training, and operations.

OHara, J.M.; Higgins, J.C.

2010-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

124

SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE 2008 TECHNICAL REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

Beginning in 2006, the US Department of Energy (DOE) supported nine applied research projects to improve the protection of the Columbia River and mitigate the impacts of Hanford Site groundwater. These projects were funded through a supplemental Congressional budget allocation, and are now in various stages of completion in accordance with the research plans. The DOE Office of Environmental Management Groundwater and Soil Cleanup Technologies (EM-22) sponsored a technical peer review meeting for these projects in Richland WA, July 28-31, 2008. The overall objective of the peer review is to provide information to support DOE decisions about the status and potential future application of the various technologies. The charge for the peer review panel was to develop recommendations for each of the nine 'technologies'. Team members for the July 2008 review were Brian Looney, Gene LeBoeuf, Dawn Kaback, Karen Skubal, Joe Rossabi, Paul Deutsch, and David Cocke. Previous project reviews were held in May 2007 and March-May of 2006. The team used the following four rating categories for projects: (a) Incorporate the technology/strategy in ongoing and future EM activities; (b) Finish existing scope of applied research and determine potential for EM activities when research program is finished; (c) Discontinue current development activities and do not incorporate technology/strategy into ongoing and future EM activities unless a significant and compelling change in potential viability is documented; and (d) Supplement original funded work to obtain the data needed to support a DOE decision to incorporate the technology into ongoing and future EM activities. The supplemental funding portfolio included two projects that addressed strontium, five projects that addressed chromium, one project that addressed uranium and one project that addressed carbon tetrachloride. The projects ranged from in situ treatment methods for immobilizing contaminants using chemical-based methods such as phosphate addition, to innovative surface treatment technologies such as electrocoagulation. Total funding for the nine projects was $9,900,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2006 and $2,000,000 in FY 2007. At the Richland meeting, the peer reviewers provided a generally neutral assessment of the projects and overall progress, and a generally positive assessment with regard to the principal investigators meeting their stated research objectives and performing the planned laboratory research and limited field work. Only one project, the Electrocoagulation Treatability Test, received a rating of 'discontinue' from the team because the project goals had not been met. Because this particular project has already ended, no action with respect to funding withdrawal is necessary. All other projects were recommended to be finished and/or incorporated into field efforts at Hanford. Specific technical comments and recommendations were provided by the team for each project.

Looney, B; Dawn S. Kaback, D; Eugene L. LeBoeuf, E; Joe Rossabi, J; Karen L. Skubal, K; David L. Cocke, D; Paul C. Deutsch, P

2008-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

125

SCFA lead lab technical assistance review of the Pit 7 Complex source containment  

SciTech Connect

On January 29-30, 2001 a technical assistance team (TAT) met with the Pit 7 project team at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to review technologies being evaluated for remediation in the Site 300 Pit 7 Complex and the process for selecting these technologies. Specifically, the project team presented the TAT with a core need to identify technically and economically practicable technologies and methods to stabilize, contain, or control the tritium and uranium in the source areas at the Pits 3 and 5 landfill area to prevent further releases of these contaminants to groundwater and the migration of tritiated and uranium-contaminated groundwater. The approaches and needs for the systems surrounding the landfills were also presented and discussed. With encouragement from the project team, the TAT expanded its focus to include additional site characterization, a water balance model, and computational models. The TAT was comprised of leading technical and regulatory experts from around the country and was assembled by SCFA's Lead Lab in response to a technical assistance request from John Ziagos, Project Manager for the Pit 7 Area (Technical Assistance Request: LLNL No.1). A list of the TAT members is included below and contact information the TAT members and site participants is in Appendix B. To familiarize the TAT assistance team with Pit 7 Complex issues, the project team gave a presentation outlining the site geology, contaminant hydrogeology, land-use issues, stakeholder concerns, regulatory requirements, groundwater flow and transport modeling efforts, pit source characterization efforts, and remedial options. Time for clarification and questions between the TAT and the site team was integrated into the presentation schedule. On the morning of the second day, the TAT reconvened with the site team and John Evans of the TAT presented information about a helium soil gas survey method that could potentially be used to locate and characterize tritium hot spots in Pits 3 and 5. Following the presentation, the TAT gathered independently to identify issues that are critical to remedy selection and to list questions or information gaps that the site is trying to resolve.

Eaton, D.; Janeday, D.; Woodward, D.; Imrich, J.; Evans, J.; Morris, M.; Reimus, P.; Hazen, T.

2001-01-29T23:59:59.000Z

126

Spent fuel sabotage test program, characterization of aerosol dispersal : technical review and analysis supplement.  

SciTech Connect

This project seeks to provide vital data required to assess the consequences of a terrorist attack on a spent fuel transportation cask. One such attack scenario involves the use of conical shaped charges (CSC), which are capable of damaging a spent fuel transportation cask. In the event of such an attack, the amount of radioactivity that may be released as respirable aerosols is not known with great certainty. Research to date has focused on measuring the aerosol release from single short surrogate fuel rodlets subjected to attack by a small CSC device in various aerosol chamber designs. The last series of three experiments tested surrogate fuel rodlets made with depleted uranium oxide ceramic pellets in a specially designed double chamber aerosol containment apparatus. This robust testing apparatus was designed to prevent any radioactive release and allow high level radioactive waste disposal of the entire apparatus following testing of actual spent fuel rodlets as proposed. DOE and Sandia reviews of the project to date identified a number of issues. The purpose of this supplemental report is to address and document the DOE review comments and to resolve the issues identified in the Sandia technical review.

Durbin, Samuel G.; Lindgren, Eric Richard

2009-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 October 2012 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on the Status of Integration of Safety Into the Design of the Uranium Processing Facility [HIAR-Y-12-2012-10-02] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) observed the public hearing of the DNFSB review of the UPF project status for integrating safety into design. The meeting was broken into three parts: a panel discussion and questioning of National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) oversight and execution; a panel discussion and questioning of the B&W Y-12 Technical Services, LLC (B&W Y-12) design project team leadership; and an open public

128

Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 October 2012 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on the Status of Integration of Safety Into the Design of the Uranium Processing Facility [HIAR-Y-12-2012-10-02] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) observed the public hearing of the DNFSB review of the UPF project status for integrating safety into design. The meeting was broken into three parts: a panel discussion and questioning of National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) oversight and execution; a panel discussion and questioning of the B&W Y-12 Technical Services, LLC (B&W Y-12) design project team leadership; and an open public

129

Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting - October 2012 October 2012 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on the Status of Integration of Safety Into the Design of the Uranium Processing Facility [HIAR-Y-12-2012-10-02] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) observed the public hearing of the DNFSB review of the UPF project status for integrating safety into design. The meeting was broken into three parts: a panel discussion and questioning of National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) oversight and execution; a panel discussion and questioning of the B&W Y-12 Technical Services, LLC (B&W Y-12) design project team leadership; and an open public

130

Report of the technical review team on the Catalytic Extraction Process  

SciTech Connect

The TRT was impressed with the quality and volume of laboratory and pilot scale development work that had been conducted over the past year. Many of the doubts and questions raised by the TRP on technical details had been examined, either by theoretical calculations or in the pilot facility. Moreover, a more open and forthcoming attitude was evident among the MMT staff who either presented briefings or responded to the Team`s questions. Of special note to DOE, the TRP recognized a year ago that the pilot facility at Fall River was not designed for radioactive pilot tests. However, from the dialogue surrounding the TRP review, it was evident that not much thought had been given to the hazards, concerns, and special requirements incumbent with radioactive operations -- everything from doing pours of hot radioactive metal from a vessel to remote-handling equipment and operations. This year the TRT noticed a significant improvement in this respect.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Technical Review of the CENWP Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of the John Day Dam Forebay  

SciTech Connect

The US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District (CENWP) has developed a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the John Day forebay on the Columbia River to aid in the development and design of alternatives to improve juvenile salmon passage at the John Day Project. At the request of CENWP, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Hydrology Group has conducted a technical review of CENWP's CFD model run in CFD solver software, STAR-CD. PNNL has extensive experience developing and applying 3D CFD models run in STAR-CD for Columbia River hydroelectric projects. The John Day forebay model developed by CENWP is adequately configured and validated. The model is ready for use simulating forebay hydraulics for structural and operational alternatives. The approach and method are sound, however CENWP has identified some improvements that need to be made for future models and for modifications to this existing model.

Rakowski, Cynthia L.; Serkowski, John A.; Richmond, Marshall C.

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Greater-than-Class C low-level waste characterization technical review process  

SciTech Connect

Existing volume projections of greater-than-Class C low-level waste (GTCC LLW) vary significantly. The Department of Energy (DOE) National Low-Level Waste Management Program (NLLWMP) has undertaken activities to develop a best estimate of GTCC LLW volumes and activities for use as the planning basis. Initial information about the generation of GTCC LLW was obtained through a DOE Energy Information Administration survey. That information, combined with information from other related literature, formed the basis of a computer model, which projects potential GTCC LLW. This paper describes uncertainties in existing GTCC LLW characterization and volume projections data and describes the technical review process that is being used to assist in projections of GTCC LLW expected for storage and disposal. 8 refs., 2 tabs.

Hutchison, D.; Magleby, M.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Technical cooperation on nuclear security between the United States and China : review of the past and opportunities for the future.  

SciTech Connect

The United States and China are committed to cooperation to address the challenges of the next century. Technical cooperation, building on a long tradition of technical exchange between the two countries, can play an important role. This paper focuses on technical cooperation between the United States and China in the areas of nonproliferation, arms control and other nuclear security topics. It reviews cooperation during the 1990s on nonproliferation and arms control under the U.S.-China Arms Control Exchange, discusses examples of ongoing activities under the Peaceful Uses of Technology Agreement to enhance security of nuclear and radiological material, and suggests opportunities for expanding technical cooperation between the defense nuclear laboratories of both countries to address a broader range of nuclear security topics.

Pregenzer, Arian Leigh

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

Advisory Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and the intellectual and work environment; and the efficiency, effectiveness, and safe conduct of operations. The Board should become familiar with the Laboratory site and...

135

88 JOURNAL OF WEATHER MODiFiCATiON vOLUME 43 -TECHNICAL NOTES -CORRESPONDENCE -BOOK REVIEW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

88 JOURNAL OF WEATHER MODiFiCATiON vOLUME 43 - TECHNICAL NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE - BOOK REVIEW much to unravel about the intricacies of aerosol interactions with tropical cyclones. First we need of other factors influencing TC intensity including SST, wind shear, and the moisture content of the lower

Rhode Island, University of

136

110 kW Stationary Combined Heat and Power Systems Status and Technical Potential: Independent Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This independent review examines the status and technical potential of 1-10 kW stationary combined heat and power fuel cell systems and analyzes the achievability of the DOE cost, efficiency, and durability targets for 2012, 2015, and 2020.

137

IEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

IEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board Kenneth L. Casavant, Chair Roger Mann, Vice-Chair Joel R Independent Economic Analysis Board January 2004 Document IEAB 2004-01 #12;IEAB Juvenile Passage Cost in the Columbia River Basin. CEA principles are reviewed and related analyses and policy issues are discussed

138

A Technical Review of Penning Trap based Investigations in Neutron Decay  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This review is concerned with a detailed analysis of some of the technical problems which arise in the application of the Penning trap method to the experimental study of neutron $\\beta $ -decay,a technique which was first successfully tested on the low-flux swimming-pool reactor LIDO (capture flux =3$\\cdot 10^6$cm$^(-2)$s$^(-1)$) at AERE Harwell in the 1970's. It does not discuss the scientific merits or demerits of these studies. Of particular importance are the trapping and release of neutron decay protons, and the influence of magnetic mirror effects and radial drifting on the trapped particles. Since these have energies < 1 keV they must be accelerated to energies of order 20-30 keV following release, at which point they are recorded in a silicon surface barrier detector. However serious difficulties were encountered in the post-release acceleration process with vacuum breakdown in the presence of crossed electric and magnetic fields.

Byrne, J

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

A Technical Review of Penning Trap based Investigations in Neutron Decay  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This review is concerned with a detailed analysis of some of the technical problems which arise in the application of the Penning trap method to the experimental study of neutron $\\beta $ -decay,a technique which was first successfully tested on the low-flux swimming-pool reactor LIDO (capture flux =3$\\cdot 10^6$cm$^(-2)$s$^(-1)$) at AERE Harwell in the 1970's. It does not discuss the scientific merits or demerits of these studies. Of particular importance are the trapping and release of neutron decay protons, and the influence of magnetic mirror effects and radial drifting on the trapped particles. Since these have energies < 1 keV they must be accelerated to energies of order 20-30 keV following release, at which point they are recorded in a silicon surface barrier detector. However serious difficulties were encountered in the post-release acceleration process with vacuum breakdown in the presence of crossed electric and magnetic fields.

J. Byrne

2014-07-11T23:59:59.000Z

140

INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE C-400 INTERIM REMEDIAL PROJECT PHASE I RESULTS, PADUCAH, KENTUCKY  

SciTech Connect

The groundwater and soil in the vicinity of the C-400 Building at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), is contaminated with substantial quantities of industrial solvents, primarily trichoroethene (TCE). This solvent 'source' is recognized as a significant challenge and an important remediation target in the overall environmental cleanup strategy for PGDP. Thus, the cleanup of the C-400 TCE Source is a principal focus for the Department of Energy (DOE) and its contractors, and for PGDP regulators and stakeholders. Using a formal investigation, feasibility study and decision process, Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) was selected for the treatment of the soil and groundwater in the vicinity of C-400. ERH was selected as an interim action to remove 'a significant portion of the contaminant mass of TCE at the C-400 Cleaning Building area through treatment' with the longer term goal of reducing 'the period the TCE concentration in groundwater remains above its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL).' ERH is a thermal treatment that enhances the removal of TCE and related solvents from soil and groundwater. The heterogeneous conditions at PGDP, particularly the high permeability regional gravel aquifer (RGA), are challenging to ERH. Thus, a phased approach is being followed to implement this relatively expensive and complex remediation technology. Conceptually, the phased approach encourages safety and efficiency by providing a 'lessons learned' process and allowing appropriate adjustments to be identified and implemented prior to follow-on phase(s) of treatment. More specifically, early deployment targeted portions of the challenging RGA treatment zone with relatively little contamination reducing the risk of adverse collateral impacts from underperformance in terms of heating and capture. Because of the importance and scope of the C-400 TCE source remediation activities, DOE chartered an Independent Technical Review (ITR) in 2007 to assess the C-400 ERH plans prior to deployment and a second ITR to evaluate Phase I performance in September 2010. In this report, these ITR efforts are referenced as the '2007 ITR' and the 'current ITR', respectively. The 2007 ITR document (Looney et al., 2007) provided a detailed technical evaluation that remains relevant and this report builds on that analysis. The primary objective of the current ITR is to provide an expedited assessment of the available Phase I data to assist the PGDP team as they develop the lessons learned from Phase I and prepare plans for Phase II.

Looney, B.; Rossabi, J.; Stewart,L.; Richards, W.

2010-10-29T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

December 4, 2003, Board Public Meeting - Board Opening Remarks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

r r ' PUBLIC MEETING + + + + + THURSDAY DECEMBER 4, 2003 + + + + + The Board met in the DNFSB Hearing Room at 625 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., John T. Conway, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT JOHN T. CONWAY A.J. EGGENBERGER JOHN E. MANSFIELD R. BRUCE MATTHEWS STAFF PRESENT RICHARD A. AZZARO J. KENT FORTENBERRY JAMES J . McCONNELL KENNETH M. PUSATERI ALSO PRESENT JESSIE ROBERSON JEFFERY M. ALLISON KEITH A. KLEIN FRAZER R. LOCKHART Chairman Vice Chairman Board Member Board Member General Counsel Technical Director Deputy Technical Director General Manager Asst. Secretary, Environmental Management, DOE Manager, DOE, Savannah River Operations Office Manager, DOE, Richland Operations Office Manager, DOE, Rocky Flats Field Off ice

142

December 3, 2003, Board Public Meeting - Board Opening Remarks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PUBLIC MEETING ON OVERSIGHT PUBLIC MEETING ON OVERSIGHT + + + + + WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 3 , 2003 + + + + + The Board met in the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Hearing Room at 625 Indiana Avenue, N.W. , Suite 300, Washington, D.C., at 9 : 0 0 a.m., John T. Conway, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT JOHN T. CONWAY A.J. EGGENBERGER JOHN E. MANSFIELD R. BRUCE MATTHEWS STAFF PRESENT RICHARD A. AZZARO JAMES J. McCONNELL KENNETH M. PUSATERI ALSO PRESENT DANIEL E. GLENN MICHAEL B. MALLORY WILLIAM J. BRUMLY DENNIS R. RUDDY Chairman Vice Chairman Board Member Board Member General Counsel Deputy Technical Director General Manager Manager, Pantex Site Office General Manager, BWXT Pantex, LLC Manager, Y-12 Site Office General Manager, BWXT Y-12, LLC NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS

143

NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-573 A Biological Review of the Tortugas Pink Shrimp Fishery  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Avenue U Galveston, Texas 77551 October 2008 #12;NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-573 A Biological Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center Galveston Laboratory 4700 National Technical Information Center National Marine Fisheries Service 5825 Port Royal Galveston

144

Page 1 of 16 Computer Science Boards of Examiners  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 of 16 Computer Science Boards of Examiners The Department of Computer Science operates the following six Boards of Examiners for its on-campus provision: 1. The Computer Science Undergraduate Module Review Board of Examiners 2. The Computer Science Undergraduate Progression Board of Examiners 3

Atkinson, Katie

145

Proceedings of the technical review on advances in geothermal reservoir technology---Research in progress  

SciTech Connect

This proceedings contains 20 technical papers and abstracts describing most of the research activities funded by the Department of Energy (DOE's) Geothermal Reservoir Technology Program, which is under the management of Marshall Reed. The meeting was organized in response to several requests made by geothermal industry representatives who wanted to learn more about technical details of the projects supported by the DOE program. Also, this gives them an opportunity to personally discuss research topics with colleagues in the national laboratories and universities.

Lippmann, M.J. (ed.)

1988-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

Board of Advisors to the Presidents of the Naval Postgraduate School and the Naval War College Annual Joint Meeting of the Subcommittees: Board of Advisors to the President, Naval Postgraduate  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

as the NPS sub-committee board members reviewed SECNAVINST 1524.2B. During the lunch (Advanced Education Review Board). The AERB was originally put in placeBoard of Advisors to the Presidents of the Naval Postgraduate School

147

Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review Harry Harmon January 9, 2007 2 U.S. Department of Energy Outline * SWPF Process Overview * Major Risks * Approach for Conducting Review * Discussion of Findings * Conclusions 3 U.S. Department of Energy Salt Waste Processing Facility 4 U.S. Department of Energy SWPF Process Overview Alpha Finishing Process CSSX Alpha Strike Process MST/ Sludge Cs Strip Effluent DSS 5 U.S. Department of Energy BOTTOM LINE The SWPF Project is ready to move into final design. 6 U.S. Department of Energy Major Risks * Final geotechnical data potentially could result in redesign of the PC-3 CPA base mat and structure. * Cost and schedule impacts arising from the change from ISO-9001 to NQA-1 quality assurance requirements. * The "de-inventory, flush, and then hands-on

148

External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Monica C. Regalbuto Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM Kevin G. Brown Vanderbilt University and CRESP David W. DePaoli Oak Ridge National Laboratory Candido Pereira Argonne National Laboratory John R. Shultz Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Acknowledgements The Review Team thanks Mr. Glyn Trenchard, Team Lead for Planning and Coordination Waste Disposition Project, U.S. Department of Energy--Office of River Protection, Mr. Paul Rutland, RPP System Planning Manager for Washington River Protection Solutions, and Mr. Ernie Lee,

149

Agenda for the Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Working Group (BILIWG) Hydrogen Production Technical Team Research Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Hydrogen Production Technical Team Research Review Agenda for Tuesday, November 6, 2007 Location: BCS Incorporated, 8929 Stephens Road, Laurel, MD. 20723 410-997-7778 8:30 - 9:00 Continental Breakfast 9:00 DOE Targets, Tools and Technology o Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Targets DOE, Arlene Anderson o H2A Overview, NREL, Darlene Steward o Bio-Derived Liquids to Hydrogen Distributed Reforming Cost Analysis DTI, Brian James 10:00 Research Review o Low-Cost Hydrogen Distributed Production Systems, H2Gen, Sandy Thomas o Integrated Short Contact Time Hydrogen Generator, GE Global Research, Wei Wei o Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming, NREL, Darlene Steward o High Pressure Steam Ethanol Reforming, ANL, Romesh Kumar

150

Hanford Advisory Board Draft Letter Topic: CRESP Comment letter  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE-EM Acting Assistant Secretary Re: CRESP Methodology for the Hanford Site-wide Risk Review Project Dear Mssrs. Kosson and Whitney: The Hanford Advisory Board (Board) has been...

151

December 4, 2003, Board Public Meeting Speaker Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Henschel Henschel Jim Henschel WTP Project Director WTP Project Director Presented to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board December 4, 2003 Bechtel National, Inc. U.S. Department of Energy Contractor Oversight 2 Safety - Quality Oversight Design Construction Procurement 3 WTP Project Success Factors -- Safety -- Quality -- Compliance -- Technical -- Schedule -- Cost 4 QA Independent Audits/Surveillance Oversight Hierarchy DOE DNFSB EPA WA Ecology, Health Management/Self-Assessments Worker Self-Check Supervisory Check Second-Party Check DOE Client/Regulators Quality Assurance Organization Functional/Line Organization Industrial and Academic Reviews Corporate Oversight of Safety, Quality and Technical External Self- Assessments 5 Requirements Flow To Assessment Process Contract Commitments 10CFR 830 Subpart A

152

October 21, 2003, Board Public Meeting - Board Opening Remarks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MEETING MEETING + + + + + TUESDAY CCL / OCTOBER 21, 2003 L A 3 ' i . * G The Board met in the DNFSB Hearing Room at 625 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., John T. Conway, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT: JOHN T. CONWAY Chairman A. J . EGGENBERGER Vice Chairman R. BRUCE MATTHEWS Board member STAFF PRESENT: RICHARD A. AZZARO General Counsel J. KENT FORTENBERRY Technical Director JAMES J. McCONNELL Deputy Technical Director KENNETH M. PUSATERI General Manager ALSO PRESENT: LINTON F. BROOKS Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration BOB CARD Under Secretary for Energy Science & Environment Energy KYLE MCSLARROW Deputy Secretary of GLENN PODONSKY Director, Office of Independent Oversight & Performance Assurance NEAL R. GROSS

153

Annual report to Congress: Department of Energy activities relating to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, calendar year 1998  

SciTech Connect

This is the ninth Annual Report to the Congress describing Department of Energy (Department) activities in response to formal recommendations and other interactions with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board). The Board, an independent executive-branch agency established in 1988, provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary of energy regarding public health and safety issues at the Department`s defense nuclear facilities. The Board also reviews and evaluates the content and implementation of health and safety standards, as well as other requirements, relating to the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Department`s defense nuclear facilities. The locations of the major Department facilities are provided. During 1998, Departmental activities resulted in the proposed closure of one Board recommendation. In addition, the Department has completed all implementation plan milestones associated with four other Board recommendations. Two new Board recommendations were received and accepted by the Department in 1998, and two new implementation plans are being developed to address these recommendations. The Department has also made significant progress with a number of broad-based initiatives to improve safety. These include expanded implementation of integrated safety management at field sites, a renewed effort to increase the technical capabilities of the federal workforce, and a revised plan for stabilizing excess nuclear materials to achieve significant risk reduction.

NONE

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

Low-level liquid radioactive waste treatment at Murmansk, Russia: Technical design and review of facility upgrade and expansion  

SciTech Connect

The governments of Norway and the US have committed their mutual cooperation and support the Murmansk Shipping Company (MSCo) to expand and upgrade the Low-Level Liquid Radioactive Waste (LLRW) treatment system located at the facilities of the Russian company RTP Atomflot, in Murmansk, Russia. RTP Atomflot provides support services to the Russian icebreaker fleet operated by the MSCo. The objective is to enable Russia to permanently cease disposing of this waste in Arctic waters. The proposed modifications will increase the facility`s capacity from 1,200 m{sup 3} per year to 5,000 m{sup 3} per year, will permit the facility to process high-salt wastes from the Russian Navy`s Northern fleet, and will improve the stabilization and interim storage of the processed wastes. The three countries set up a cooperative review of the evolving design information, conducted by a joint US and Norwegian technical team from April through December, 1995. To ensure that US and Norwegian funds produce a final facility which will meet the objectives, this report documents the design as described by Atomflot and the Russian business organization, ASPECT, both in design documents and orally. During the detailed review process, many questions were generated, and many design details developed which are outlined here. The design is based on the adsorption of radionuclides on selected inorganic resins, and desalination and concentration using electromembranes. The US/Norwegian technical team reviewed the available information and recommended that the construction commence; they also recommended that a monitoring program for facility performance be instituted.

Dyer, R.S.; Diamante, J.M. [Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (United States). Office of International Activities; Duffey, R.B. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)] [and others

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Academic Advisory Board Activities and Perspectives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Advisory Board Advisory Board Activities and Perspectives Karen A. Thole, Chair Academic Advisory Board Virginia Tech, Mechanical Engineering Department Peer Review Workshop October 20, 2005 * Review of the Academic Advisory Board * Activities since 2004 Peer Review Workshop * Open discussion Discussion Topics Chair: Karen Thole, Virginia Tech Co-Chair: Tim Lieuwen, Georgia Tech Secretary: Vince McDonell, U of California-Irvine Education: Yongho Sohn, U of Central Florida Combustion: Dom Santavicca, Penn State Materials: Eric Jordan, U of Connecticut Aero / Ht Transfer: Jeffrey Bons, Brigham Young Diagnostics: Scott Sanders, U. of Wisconsin Academic Advisory Board (AAB) Contact any of us with your concerns/issues!!! Goals for the AAB * Provide guidance to the UTSR Program

156

Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical Support- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presenter: Lieko Earle, National Renewable Energy Laboratory The goal of this project is for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to provide extensive, hands-on technical support to Building America teams in the areas of experiment design, provision of research-grade measurement hardware, energy modeling, and analysis. Building Americas field testsregularly conducted by both Building America teams and national laboratoriesdemonstrate the programs best house system innovations. The tests enable cost-effective evaluation of real-world performance and help ensure that all Building America field tests result in high-impact findings that push builders and homeowners to higher levels of savings.

157

Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Office |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report - Sandia Site Office The purpose of this Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation evaluation was to conduct a thorough, independent evaluation of the status of the implementation of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Sandia Site Office (SSO) TQP and assess the actions taken to correct problems identified in the site self-evaluation report. This report documents the activities of the Accreditation Review Team and the results of its evaluation of the SSO TQP for the Accreditation Board. SSO TQP Accreditation Report More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia Site Office Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report - NNSA Service Center

158

Hanford ETR - Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - Estimate at Completion (Cost) Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comprehensive Review of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Estimate at Completion Assessment Conducted by an Independent Team of External Experts March 2006 Comprehensive Review of the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Estimate at Completion Page i of vi Executive Summary Following an August 2005 corporate commitment to the Secretary of Energy, Bechtel National, Inc. chartered a team of industry experts to review the technical, cost, and schedule aspects of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) project. This summary reflects the observations and recommendations of the EAC Review Team (ERT), comprised of six senior industry consultants, six retired Bechtel employees, one current Bechtel employee, three employees of Bechtel's competitors, and

159

1…10 kW Stationary Combined Heat and Power Systems Status and Technical Potential: Independent Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1-10 kW Stationary Combined Heat 1-10 kW Stationary Combined Heat and Power Systems Status and Technical Potential National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard * Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Independent Review Published for the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program NREL/BK-6A10-48265 November 2010 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or

160

ESnet Policy Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ESnet Policy Board About ESnet Our Mission The Network ESnet History Governance & Policies ESnet Policy Board ESCC Acceptable Use Policy Facility Data Policy Career Opportunities...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council and the National SALMON SCIENCE AND THE SALMON RECOVERY EFFORT............................................................................7 REVIEW OF MODELS: RESULTS VERSUS APPROACHES

162

CERTS 2012 Program Review - NASPI Leadership and Task Team Technical Support - Joe Gracia, ORNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ORNL's Support of NASPI ORNL's Support of NASPI Presented at: DOE OE Transmission Reliability Program Review ORNL Team: Jose R. Gracia, P.E. (Presenter) D. Tom Rizy Isabelle Snyder, Ph.D. 12 June 2012 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy OE Transmission Reliability Program Review NASPI Goal: To improve the reliable operation of the North American power system by successfully transitioning synchrophasor technologies from research to industry adoption. 2 Project Objective(s) ORNL's activities in support of NASPI include: * Participate in NASPI Leadership Team * Support Operations Implementation Task Team * Participate in Performance and Standards Task Team * Develop needed metrology capabilities in partnership with NIST.

163

APS Experiment Safety Review Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

work. The Committee will solicit other representatives to participate in standing or ad hoc subcommittees as deemed necessary. Committee members can solicit nominations of...

164

Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review past procedures used to write, revise, or maintain a Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard.

165

CERTS 2012 Program Review - NASPI Leadership and Task Team Technical Support - Jeff Dagle, PNNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PNNL Support for NASPI PNNL Support for NASPI Jeff Dagle Pacific Northwest National Lab jeff.dagle@pnnl.gov 11/12 June 2012 Washington, DC OE Transmission Reliability Program Review 2 Project Objective(s) To improve the reliable operation of the North American power system by successfully transitioning synchrophasor technologies from research to industry adoption PNNL's activities in support of NASPI include:  Facilitate leadership and planning activities for the NASPI leadership team and work group meetings  Support the NASPI website, mailing lists, and task team administrative support (e.g., conference call scheduling and facilitation) PNNL Activities in Support of NASPI in FY12 (cont.)  Special assignments

166

Index to Nuclear Safety: a technical progress review by chronology, permuted title, and author, Volume 18 (1) through Volume 22 (6)  

SciTech Connect

This index to Nuclear Safety covers articles published in Nuclear Safety, Volume 18, Number 1 (January-February 1977) through Volume 22, Number 6 (November-December 1981). The index is divided into three section: a chronological list of articles (including abstracts), a permuted-title (KWIC) index, and an author index. Nuclear Safety, a bimonthly technical progress review prepared by the Nuclear Safety Information Center, covers all safety aspects of nuclear power reactors and associated facilities. Over 300 technical articles published in Nuclear Safety in the last 5 years are listed in this index.

Cottrell, W.B.; Passiakos, M.

1982-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Perspectives from the Board's Technical Staff  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

River Site Y-12 Site Los Alamos Site Source: http:landcover.usgs.govnatllandcover.php 7 Adjusting Dispersion Coefficients due to Surface Roughness * DOE Guidance - Surface...

168

US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap The Fuel Cell Technical Team (FCTT) conducts the following activities: (1) Reviews and evaluates...

169

Technical Review Report for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Model 9977 S-SARP-G-00001 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This Technical Review Report (TRR) summarizes the review findings for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Model 9977 B(M)F-96 shipping container. The content analyzed for this submittal is Content Envelope C.1, Heat Sources, in assemblies of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators or food-pack cans. The SARP under review, i.e., S-SARP-G-00001, Revision 2 (August 2007), was originally referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package. The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's, Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9977 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. The Model 9977 Package design includes a single, 6-inch diameter, stainless steel pressure vessel containment system (i.e., the 6CV) that was designed and fabricated in accordance with Section III, Subsection NB, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. The earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, 9966, 9967 and 9968 Packages, were originally designed and certified in the 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with new safety requirements, based on International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, were proposed. The updated package designs were the Model 9972, 9973, 9974 and 9975 Packages, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. Differences between the Model 9975 Package and the Model 9977 Package include: (1) The lead shield present in the Model 9975 Package is absent in the Model 9977 Package; (2) The Model 9975 Package has eight allowable contents, while the Model 9977 Package has a single allowable content. (3) The 6CV of the Model 9977 Package is similar in design to the outer Containment Vessel of the Model 9975 Package that also incorporates a 5-inch Containment Vessel as the inner Containment Vessel. (4) The Model 9975 Package uses a Celotex{reg_sign}-based impact limiter while the Model 9977 Package uses Last-A-Foam{reg_sign}, a polyurethane foam, for the impact limiter. (5) The Model 9975 Package has two Containment Vessels, while the Model 9977 Package has a single Containment Vessel.

DiSabatino, A; Hafner, R; West, M

2007-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

170

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review: Phase 1 Technical Studies  

SciTech Connect

Since 1964, the Columbia River Treaty has provided signi?cant bene?ts to the United States and Canada through coordinated river management by the two countries. It remains the standard against which other international water coordination agreements around the world are compared. When the Treaty was negotiated, its goals were to provide signi?cant ?ood control and power generation bene?ts to both countries. However, the Treaty contains two provisions that may signi?cantly change these bene?ts as early as the year 2024. First, in 2024 the 60 years of purchased ?ood control space in Canadian Treaty projects expires. Instead of a coordinated and managed plan to regulate both Canadian and U.S. projects for ?ood control, the Treaty calls for a shift to a Canadian operation under which the United States can call upon Canada for ?ood control assistance. The United States can request this called upon assistance as needed but only to the extent necessary to meet forecast ?ood control needs in the United States that cannot adequately be met by U.S. projects. When called upon is requested, the United States will then have to pay Canada for its operational costs and any economic losses resulting from the called upon ?ood control operation. Second, while the Treaty has no speci?ed end date, it does allow either Canada or the United States the option to terminate most of the provisions of the Treaty on or after Sept. 16, 2024, with a minimum of 10 years advance written notice. Thus, the year 2024 is the ?rst year a notice of termination would take effect assuming written notice of termination is given by the Canadian or U.S. governments by 2014. Unless the Treaty is terminated or the federal governments elect to modify the Treaty, its provisions continue inde?nitely, except for the changes in ?ood control discussed above. Given the signi?cance of both of these provisions, it is important that the parties to the Treaty understand the implications for post-2024 Treaty planning and Columbia River operations. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bonneville Power Administration, the agencies that implement the Treaty in the United States on behalf of the U.S. Entity (see Treaty Governance sidebar), are conducting a multi-year effort to understand these implications. This effort is called the 2014/2024 Columbia River Treaty Review.

none,

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Type A Accident Investigation Board Report on the January 17, 1996, Electrical Accident With Injury in Building 209, Technical Area 21, Tritium Science and Fabrication Facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report is an independent product of the Type A Accident Investigation Board appointed by Tara OToole, M.D., M.P.H., Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health (EH-1).

172

Michael Gronceski Mission Concept Review (MCR),  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on a plan to address the issues and concerns in the review board's report. d) Agreement exists on a plan review and the review board(s) have been resolved, or a timely plan exists to resolve the issues. gMichael Gronceski 1/31/2013 #12;#12; Mission Concept Review (MCR), System Requirements Review (SRR

Rhoads, James

173

ORSSAB monthly board meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The ORSSAB monthly board meeting is open to the public. The board will hear a presentation and discuss the development of a comprehensive mercury strategy for the Oak Ridge Reservation.

174

Hanford Advisory Board Values  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Values Adopted: November 2, 2012 1 Since its founding in 1994, the Hanford Advisory Board (Board) has issued more than 260 pieces of consensus advice on a myriad of topics related...

175

SAM Technical Review Committee Final Report: Summary and Key Recommendations from the Onsite TRC Meeting Held April 22-23, 2013  

SciTech Connect

The System Advisor Model (SAM) is a broad and robust set of models and frameworks for analyzing both system performance and system financing. It does this across a range of technologies dominated by solar technologies including photovoltaics (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP). The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Solar Energy Technology Program requested the SAM development team to review the photovoltaic performance modeling with the development community and specifically, with the independent engineering community. The report summarizes the major effort for this technical review committee (TRC).

Blair, N.; Dobos, S.; Janzou, S.; Gilman, P.; Freeman, J.; Kaffine, L.

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Commonwealth Telecommunications Board  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... THE ninth General Report of the Commonwealth Telecommunications Board covers the year ended December 31, 1956 (pp. 56. London : Commonwealth ... Board covers the year ended December 31, 1956 (pp. 56. London : Commonwealth Telecommunications Board, 1968). During this year the first trans-Atlantic telephone cable was opened ...

1958-06-14T23:59:59.000Z

177

Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Rosemarie Bartlett,...

178

Independent Oversight Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory, December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Area 55 Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory December 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2

179

Outside Review of the Doctoral Program of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry of Texas Technical University (TTU)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

observed no desire to remain static. There is also a deci- sion-making process in place to support with the internal and external reviewers present and again on February 6 among internal reviewers. The review team

Rock, Chris

180

ESnet Policy Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ESnet Policy Board Larry Smarr Jagdeep Singh Kristin Rauschenbach Cees de Laat David Foster David Clark Vinton Cerf ESCC Acceptable Use Policy Facility Data Policy Career...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Utility Sounding Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports, Publications, and Research Utility Toolkit Sponsored E-Source Membership Utility Potential Calculator EE Maximization Tool Conduit Utility Sounding Board Residential...

182

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

issues are subjects of large scale integrated testing that is just beginning. Scott said small scale testing indicated problems with Hanford Advisory Board Page 12 Final Meeting...

183

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Disposal Facility (ERDF), and 2) the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 budget request and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding. The Board also authorized its chair to sign...

184

University of Delaware | CCEI Advisory Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Advisory Board Our advisory board is comprised of the following distinguished board members: Image Name Affiliation BACK TO TOP...

185

March 24, 2010 Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: The Independent Science Advisory Board's (ISAB) current review of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration1 March 24, 2010 Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB) c/o Erik Merrill Northwest Power-effective way to achieve salmon recovery goals. We hold this current NOAA decision on how to maximize salmon

186

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

............................................................................................ 2 1. Review of NOAA Fisheries' Recovery Plan and Life-cycle Modeling ProductsIndependent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council, Columbia 97204 Independent Scientific Advisory Board Fiscal Year 2014 Statement of Work October 1, 2013 through

187

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.................. 3 2. Review of NOAA Fisheries' Recovery Plan and Life-cycle Modeling ProductsIndependent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council, Columbia 97204 Independent Scientific Advisory Board Fiscal Year 2012 Statement of Work October 1, 2011 through

188

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1950 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS R. E. BEARD Statistics...Price 20s. [453 ] REVIEWS Statistics, Volume I...regard to the mathematical standard required by the Institute...distributions.' The general plan of the book is first......

R. E. BEARD

1950-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for the preservation of historic properties owned or controlled by them. The Hanford Advisory Board (Board) is concerned that during cleanup of the Hanford Site, many...

190

November 24, 2009, Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - Transcript  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2-234-4433 2-234-4433 Neal R. Gross & Co., Inc. Page 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + + + + + DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD + + + + + WEDNESDAY MAY 12, 2010 + + + + + The Board met in the DNFSB Hearing Room at 625 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C., Peter S. Winokur, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT: PETER S. WINOKUR, Chairman JOHN E. MANSFIELD, Vice Chairman JOSEPH F. BADER, Board Member LARRY W. BROWN, Board Member JESSIE H. ROBERSON, Board Member STAFF PRESENT: RICHARD A. AZZARO, General Counsel TIMOTHY J. DWYER, Technical Director

191

Savannah River Site- Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This is a presentation outlining the Salt Waste Processing Facility process, major risks, approach for conducting reviews, discussion of the findings, and conclusions.

192

CHRPR Neutron Board Replacement Manual  

SciTech Connect

This document will walk through the steps to exchange the neutron channel boards with gamma channel boards in the CHRPR box.

Erikson, Rebecca L.; Myjak, Mitchell J.

2013-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

193

BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER FINANCE CORPORATION Monday March FOR BIOSCIENCE CONNECTICUT - AMBULATORY CARE CENTER.* 3. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT WITH NUANCE, INC

Kim, Duck O.

194

FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(EPA) said he wanted to remind RAP that EPA will be meeting with the National Remedy Review Board in the last week of March to discuss the 300 Area, K Area, and 200-UP-1....

195

FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the draft into a version RAP would like to send to the Board. Dale said they should review the draft by sections, starting with the background. Susan Hayman edited the...

196

Policy Statement 3, Board Oversight of Department of Energy Decommissioning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 Date: August 19, 1996 Subject Policy Statement on Board oversight of Department of Energy decommissioning activities at defense nuclear facilities. Summary This policy statement describes the decommissioning phase of a DOE defense nuclear facility and identifies the Board's safety oversight responsibilities for decommisioning activities. John T. Conway, Chairman Congress directed the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) to oversee Department of Energy (DOE) practices at defense nuclear facilities that could adversely affect public health and safety during any stage in the life cycle of those facilities, from design, construction, and operation through decommissioning. The Board's objective during decommissioning is identical to its objective during any other phase of a facility's life cycle: to ensure that DOE provides adequate protection of worker and public health and safety at defense nuclear facilities. Congress specifically tasked the Board with reviewing and evaluating:

197

Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board c/o Okanogan County Natural Resources  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board c/o Okanogan County Natural Resources 123 5th Ave N, Suite 110 Salmon Recovery Board (Board) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Northwest Power, the Yakama Nation, and the Colville Confederated Tribes. The agencies reviewed the proposed projects using

198

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers: Serve as the DOE element representatives to STIP and ensure that STI objectives and requirements are incorporated into strategic planning, management information plans, life-cycle procedures from project initiation to close-out, and contract language as appropriate. Coordinate with contractor STI managers and have adequate familiarity with STI activities to discern contractor compliance with the CRD portion of this directive. Coordinate the implementation of appropriate review and release procedures by DOE elements, DOE contractors, and financial assistance recipients as appropriate. Serve as Releasing Officials or coordinate designation and official

199

Safety and Technical Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Safety and Technical Services Safety and Technical Services Minimize The Safety and Technical Services (STS) organization is a component of the Office of Science's (SC's) Oak Ridge Integrated Support Center. The mission of STS is to provide excellent environmental, safety, health, quality, and engineering support to SC laboratories and other U.S. Department of Energy program offices. STS maintains a full range of technically qualified Subject Matter Experts, all of whom are associated with the Technical Qualifications Program. Examples of the services that we provide include: Integrated Safety Management Quality Assurance Planning and Metrics Document Review Tracking and trending analysis and reporting Assessments, Reviews, Surveillances and Inspections Safety Basis Support SharePoint/Dashboard Development for Safety Programs

200

ORSSAB monthly board meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Board members and participants will hear a presentation and updates about the "Y-12 Mercury Cleanup Strategy and Plan for a Y-12 Water Treatment Plant." The meeting is open to the public.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

different now; the superstructure is gone and they removed a tank from the 107-N ion exchange building; they are making good progress Hanford Advisory Board Page 4 Final Meeting...

202

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(DOE-ORP) thanking them for their efforts to secure cleanup funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The Board did not take action on a draft letter...

203

SRTC criticality safety technical review: Phase 1 criticality analysis for the 9972-9975 family of shipping casks: (SRT-CMA-940003)  

SciTech Connect

Review of SRT-CMA-940003, ``Phase I Criticality Analysis For The 9972-9975 Family Of Shipping Casks (U). (SRT-CMA-940003).`` January 22, 1994, has been performed by the SRTC Applied Physics Group. The NCSE is a criticality assessment of the 9972-9975 family of shipping casks. This work is a follow-on of a previous criticality safety evaluation, with the differences between this and the previous evaluation are that now wall tolerances are modeled and more sophisticated analytical methods are applied. The NCSE under review concludes that, with one exception, the previously specified plutonium and uranium mass limits for 9972-9975 family of shipping casks do ensure that WSRC Nuclear Criticality Safety Manual requirements (ref. 1) are satisfied. The one exception is that the plutonium mass limit for the 9974 cask had to be reduced from 4.4 to 4.3 kg. In contrast, the 7.5 kg uranium mass limit for the 9974 cask was raised to 14.5 kg, making the uranium mass identical for all casks in this family. This technical review consisted of an independent check of the methods and models employed, application of ANSI/ANS 8.1 and 8.15, and verification of WSRC Nuclear Criticality Safety Manual procedures.

Rathbun, R.

1994-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

204

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1959 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS E. S. PEARSON The Advanced...433 . 84s. [491 ] REVIEWS The Advanced Theory of...the same comprehensive standard, three volumes will...inserted in the original plan at this half-way stage......

E. S. PEARSON

1959-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review Reviews Reviews Factors for One-sided...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...Pp. 412 . 5.00. Reviews 293 Handbook of Nonparametric...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...expected value ft and standard deviation cr/^/n......

Reviews

1964-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Technical Assistance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Technical Assistance The Technical Assistance program is managed through the Center for Sustainable Soil and Groundwater Solutions at SRNL. The Technical Assistance program provides teams of nationally recognized experts from across the complex to support both DOE's smaller sites, such as Paducah, Portsmouth, Pinellas, Ashtabula, Fernald, Mound and Kansas City Plant, and larger sites such as Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Savannah River. Solutions that reduce technical risk and uncertainty Focus on science and engineering issues and strategic implementation of remedial systems Independent reviews facilitate regulatory and stakeholder acceptance of solutions. Contacts Karen Skubal karen.skubal@em.doe.gov (301) 903-6524 Justin Marble

207

AVIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS BYLAWS AND PROTOCOLS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AVIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS AVIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS BYLAWS AND PROTOCOLS The Department of Energy strives to manage its Aviation Program toward the highest standards of safety, efficiency, fairness in contracting, preservation of competition in the private sector, open communication, prudent property management, and the best examples of resource management. Toward these ends, the Department has established a management structure led by a Board of Directors comprising active Federal employee aviation managers from the Department. AUTHORITY: The following authorities serve as basis for this structure and system: Office of Management and Budget Circular A-126, FMR 102.33, DEAR 109, DOE Order 440.2B, Aviation Management Review Team Report, March 1999, and Secretary of Energy Appointment and Delegation of Authority, April 15, 1999.

208

CERTS 2012 Program Review - NASPI Technical Support for OITT & Operations of NERC-TVA NASPI Synchrophasor Network & RTDMS Installation - Jim Dyer, EPG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SynchroPhasor Initiative SynchroPhasor Initiative (NASPI) Event Analysis Reports Jim Dyer dyer@ElectricPowerGroup.com June 12, 2012 Washington, DC DOE - CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review Agenda  Technical Support for Operations of Real Time Dynamics Monitoring System (RTDMS) for NASPI  Support of the RTDMS Users' Group  Support of NASPI Operations Implementation Task Team (OITT) Page 1  Built upon GRID-3P Platform, U.S. Patent 7,233,843, and U.S. Patent 8,060259. All rights reserved. NASPI-RTDMS Support Page 2  Objective - Enhance, maintain and support the RTDMS application, server, data base and client. Support users needs and provide an application that converts phasor date into useful information

209

Embedded controllers for local board-control  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The LHCb experiment at CERN has a large number of custom electronic boards performing high-speed data-processing. Like in any large experiment the control and monitoring of these crate-mounted boards must be integrated into the overall control-system. Traditionally this has been done by using buses like VME on the back-plane of the crates. LHCb has chosen to equip every board with an embedded micro-controller and connecting them in a large Local Area Network. The intelligence of these devices allows complex (soft) real-time control and monitoring, required for modern powerful FPGA driven electronics. Moreover each board has its own, isolated control access path, which increases the robustness of the entire system. The system is now in pre-production at several sites and will go into full production during next year. The hardware and software will be discussed and experiences from the R&D and pre-production will be reviewed, with an emphasis on advantages and difficulties of this approach to board-control.

Neufeld, Niko; Mini, Giuseppe; Sannino, Mario; Guzik, Zbigniew; Jacobsson, Richard; Jost, Beat

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

October 21, 2003, Board Public Meeting Presentations - DNFSB Staff Remarks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

James J. McConnell James J. McConnell Deputy Technical Director, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board October 21, 2003 Good morning, my name is Jim McConnell and I am the Deputy Technical Director for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. At the beginning of the first session on oversight held in September, I provided some remarks on behalf of the Board's staff concerning the role of oversight in the larger system by which DOE directs its activities. I am pleased this morning to add to that discussion focusing more specifically on DOE's current and planned oversight activities. At the last public meeting I described the system that DOE uses in its roles as customer, owner, and enforcer, to communicate its expectations to its contractors and the methods DOE uses to ensure that

211

DOE-DARPA High-Performance Corrosion-Resistant Materials (HPCRM), Annual HPCRM Team Meeting & Technical Review  

SciTech Connect

The overall goal is to develop high-performance corrosion-resistant iron-based amorphous-metal coatings for prolonged trouble-free use in very aggressive environments: seawater & hot geothermal brines. The specific technical objectives are: (1) Synthesize Fe-based amorphous-metal coating with corrosion resistance comparable/superior to Ni-based Alloy C-22; (2) Establish processing parameter windows for applying and controlling coating attributes (porosity, density, bonding); (3) Assess possible cost savings through substitution of Fe-based material for more expensive Ni-based Alloy C-22; (4) Demonstrate practical fabrication processes; (5) Produce quality materials and data with complete traceability for nuclear applications; and (6) Develop, validate and calibrate computational models to enable life prediction and process design.

Farmer, J; Brown, B; Bayles, B; Lemieux, T; Choi, J; Ajdelsztajn, L; Dannenberg, J; Lavernia, E; Schoenung, J; Branagan, D; Blue, C; Peter, B; Beardsley, B; Graeve, O; Aprigliano, L; Yang, N; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Boudreau, J

2007-09-21T23:59:59.000Z

212

Other Board Activities During 1998, the Board evaluated elements of the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

waste management program in addition to the site-characterization efforts at Yucca Mountain Upwelling at Yucca Mountain The Board completed its review of material (11 re- ports) first submitted that there is evidence of ongoing, intermittent hydrothermal upwelling at Yucca Mountain and that large earth- quake

213

Technical Articles  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Articles science-innovationassetsimagesicon-science.jpg Technical Articles National security depends on science and technology. The United States relies on Los...

214

Technical Qualification Program Reaccreditation Report- Sandia Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report documents the activities and results of the Reaccreditation Review Team evaluation of the SSO TQP for the Reaccreditation Board.

215

Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report- Nevada Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report documents the activities and results of the Accreditation Review Team evaluation of the NSO TQP for the Accreditation Board.

216

Corporate Board Meeting Minutes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

th th Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board Meeting Minutes February 16, 2011 - Oak Ridge, TN Page 1 of 17 Voting Board Members in Attendance (general attendance sheet for the meeting is attached): *Greg Hayward - Idaho Robert Brown - Oak Ridge Ray Corey - Richland *Bill Rowland - Savannah River Bud Danielson -Chief of Nuclear Safety T.J. Jackson - EMCBC Ken Picha (chair) - Headquarters Acting EM-20 Russell McCallister - Portsmouth/Paducah Bob Murray (vice-chair) - Headquarters EM-23 No Voting Member Present - Carlsbad Jonathan (JD) Dowell - River Protection *Note: The by-laws require the voting member to be the Site Manager or assistant/deputy manager. The noted

217

Renewing Board Certification  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Many persons argue that certification of a specialist indicates that he is up-to-date and competent at the time of examination but this does not prove that he continues indefinitely thereafter to be competent and aware of all important new knowledge in his field. This is obviously true and, as the certifying... Like gross anatomy class and the first night on call as an intern, the medical specialty board examination is a rite of passage for physicians. Dr. Robert Steinbrook reports that in 2005, board certification is in the midst of two fundamental changes.

Steinbrook R.

2005-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

218

QA Corporate Board Meeting - February 2010 (Teleconference) ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

QA Corporate Board Meeting - February 2010 (Teleconference) QA Corporate Board Meeting - February 2010 (Teleconference) 6thEM Quality Assurance Corporate Board Meeting Agenda for...

219

California Air Resources Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Air Resources Board Jump to: navigation, search Logo: California Air Resources Board Name: California Air Resources Board Place: Sacramento, California Website: http:...

220

Quality Assurance Corporate Board | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Corporate Board Quality Assurance Corporate Board The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance Corporate Board is an...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

The Hanford Advisory Board (HAB or Board) welcomes public comment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hanford Advisory Board (HAB or Board) welcomes public comment on cleanup of the Hanford Site. Those wishing to make public comment during the meeting should sign in and notify the...

222

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Board (Board) would like to thank the Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) agencies for the 200-UP-1 Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS), Proposed Plan, and Interim Record of...

223

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, Oregon 97204 Review of the Interior Columbia River Technical Recovery Team's Analyses of Survival Changes......................................................................................................................... 10 #12;Review of the Interior Columbia River Technical Recovery Team's Analyses of Survival Changes. Usha Varanasi requested that the ISAB review the Interior Columbia River Technical Recovery Team

224

November 24, 2009, Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - Transcript  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Neal R. Gross & Co., Inc. Neal R. Gross & Co., Inc. 202-234-4433 Page 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + + + + + DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD + + + + + OVERSIGHT OF COMPLEX, HIGH-HAZARD NUCLEAR OPERATIONS + + + + + TUESDAY NOVEMBER 24, 2009 + + + + + The Board met in the DNFSB Hearing Room at 625 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004, at 9:00 a.m., John E. Mansfield, Vice Chairman, presiding. UPRESENTU : JOHN E. MANSFIELD, Ph.D., Vice Chairman JOSEPH F. BADER, Board Member LARRY W. BROWN, Board Member PETER S. WINOKUR, Ph.D., Board Member USTAFF PRESENTU : RICHARD A. AZZARO, General Counsel TIMOTHY J. DWYER, Technical Director BRIAN GROSNER, General Manager RICHARD E. TONTODONATO, Deputy Technical Director Neal R. Gross & Co., Inc.

225

Advisory Board Chris Donnelly,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Michael DeBonis, Maine Forest Service J.B. Cullen, New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands Steven Forest Service's Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, the seven states of New England and New, and cooperators at various levels of public and private service. The Center has a fourteen member Advisory Board

Schweik, Charles M.

226

Hanford Advisory Board Page 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

glad to be back with the Board, noting Susan will remain on the project as a strategic advisor. Cathy also introduced Melissa Thom, EnviroIssues, who is also back with the Board...

227

Arduino Board Design Nicholas Skadberg  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Arduino Board Design Nicholas Skadberg 4/30/09 EE290 Dr. Pushkin Kachroo #12;Abstract In an effort an Arduino Atmega 168 controller chip and an Arduino Duemilanove circuit board. The device is controlled

Kachroo, Pushkin

228

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification" Date: November 6, 2000 for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy Reviewed: Technical Evaluation Report Approved: "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Center for Astrophysics & Space Astronomy Revision A Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT

Colorado at Boulder, University of

229

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular Applications October 30, 2006 .....................................................................................................................................................................8 APPENDIX A: Review of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Systems ......................................................................................18 APPENDIX C: Presentation to the FreedomCAR & Fuel Hydrogen Storage Technical Team

230

BOARD OF DIRECTORS Tim Pellissier, President -Division 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

adoption of Resolution No. 2013-36 approving Renewable Portfolio Standard ("RPS") Procurement Plan of Directors will review and consider adoption of Resolution No. 2013-33 allowing California Public Employees. 2013-34 & 35: The Board of Directors will review and consider adoption of Resolution No. 2013-34 and 35

231

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council and the National Philipp Brian Riddell ISAB 2001-7 August 22, 2001 #12;ISAB 2001-7 Recovery Strategies Review i Contents Marine Fisheries Service 851 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 ISAB@nwppc.org A Review

232

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council and the National Marine Fisheries Service 851 SW 6 th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 ISAB@nwppc.org Review Lyman McDonald David Philipp Brian Riddell #12;i Review of Lower Snake River Flow Augmentation Studies

233

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council and the National Marine Fisheries Service 851 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 ISAB@nwppc.org Review William Liss Lyman McDonald David Philipp Brian Riddell #12;ISAB 2001-6 Biological Objectives Review i

234

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power Planning Council, the National Marine 97204 ISAB@nwppc.org A Review of Strategies for Recovering Tributary Habitat Robert E. Bilby Peter ADonald David Philipp Brian Riddell March 31, 2003 ISAB 2003-2 #12;ISAB 2003-2 Tributary Habitat i ISAB Review

235

Technology Innovation Program Advisory Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technology Innovation Program Advisory Board 2009 Annual Report of the Technology Innovation Program Advisory Board 2010 Annual Report of the #12;2010 Annual Report of the Technology Innovation Program Advisory Board U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology

236

Ammonia as an Alternative Energy Storage Medium for Hydrogen Fuel Cells: Scientific and Technical Review for Near-Term Stationary Power Demonstration Projects, Final Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

State-of-the-Art Hydrogen Storage in Solids, Presentationfor High Density Hydrogen storage, Fuel Cell Seminar,for On-Board Vehicular Hydrogen Storage, U.S. Department of

Lipman, Tim; Shah, Nihar

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Technical Review Report for the Model 9977 Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Addendum 1 Justification for DNDO Contents  

SciTech Connect

The Model 9977 Package is currently certified for Content Envelope C.1, {sup 238}Pu Heat Sources, either in Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG), or in Food-Pack Can configurations, under Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Certificate Number 9977 and Package Identification Number USA/9977/B(M)F-96 (DOE). Addendum 1, Justification for DNDO Contents,--the Submittal--supplements Revision 2 of the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging for the Model 9977 Package. The Submittal adds five new contents to the Model 9977 Package, Content Envelopes, AC.1 through AC.5. The Content Envelopes are neptunium metal, the beryllium-reflected plutonium ball (BeRP Ball), plutonium/uranium metal, plutonium/uranium metal with enhanced wt% {sup 240}Pu (to 50 wt%), and uranium metal. The last three Content Envelopes are stabilized to DOE-STD-3013. These Content Envelopes will be shipped to the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), where they will reside, and, hence, to off-site locations in support of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO). The new certificate will apply to a limited number of Model 9977 Packages. At the same time, the Submittal requests an extension of the periodic maintenance requirements from one (1) year to up to five (5) years using Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) temperature-monitoring systems to measure the ambient storage temperature in order to ensure that the temperature of the Viton{reg_sign} O-rings for the 6-inch Containment Vessel (6CV) remain less than 200 F. The RFIDs have been developed by Argonne National Laboratory. An on-going surveillance program at the K-Area Materials Storage (KAMS) facility at the Savannah River Site, and an on-going examination of Viton{reg_sign} O-rings from mock Primary Containment Vessels (PCVs) at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) provide the technical justification for the extension of the periodic maintenance interval. Where extended periodic maintenance is desired, the decay heat rate for the Model 9977 Package is limited to 15 watts.

West, M H

2008-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

238

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......of organizing computations (though he does not discuss the product form of the inverse...theory. It reads with the drynesa of a handbook. This does not detract from Reviews 479 ita value; as a handbook it is excellent and the reviewer has no......

J. G. SAW

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

Outbreak of Infection with a Multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain Associated with Contaminated Roll Boards in Operating Rooms  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...contamination of the roll boards used to transport...replacement of the roll boards in the operation...A preliminary review of the patients...formerly the National Committee for...performed in the recovery ward of the OR...supported by the recovery of MRKP from...samples of the roll boards in OR-X and...

Annemarie van 't Veen; Anneke van der Zee; Jolande Nelson; Ben Speelberg; Jan A. J. W. Kluytmans; Anton G. M. Buiting

2005-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Board of Governors Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Tim Fister Earns Henderson Prize from University of Washington Tim Fister Earns Henderson Prize from University of Washington Challenge Met as APS Sends Final Chambers to LCLS A Marriage of Hardware and Hard Work Shaken but Not Stirred 2008 Rosalind Franklin Young Investigator Award APS News Archives: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 2000 Subscribe to APS News rss feed Board of Governors Awards JUNE 3, 2008 Bookmark and Share The UChicago Argonne, LLC Board of Governors for Argonne will honor 10 employees and one child of an employee with awards at its 2008 Awards Program on Tuesday, June 24, 2008. Included in that number are two Advanced Photon Source (APS) staff members, a member of the Scientific User Facilities Directorate, and the son of another APS staffer. Outstanding Service Awards (OSAs), the highest honor the university gives

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

On-board Diagnostics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

On-board On-board Diagnostics for Big Data J. Zurawski ⇤ , S. Balasubramanian ⇤ , A. Brown ‡ , E. Kissel † , A. Lake ⇤ , M. Swany † , B. Tierney ⇤ and M. Zekauskas ‡ ⇤ Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA Email: {zurawski, sowmya, andy, bltierney}@es.net † Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing, Bloomington, IN, USA Email: {ezkissel, swany}@indiana.edu ‡ Internet2 Ann Arbor, MI, USA Email: {aaron, matt}@internet2.edu Abstract-Big science data necessitates the requirement to incorporate state-of-the-art technologies and processes into science workflows. When transferring "big data", the network infrastructure connects sites for storage, analysis and data transfer. A component that is often overlooked within the network is a robust measurement and testing infrastructure that

242

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......continuity management standards: the earlier British standard BS 25999 and the international...requirements of the latter standard. The fourth part of...Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information...first three chapters review the threat landscape......

Project Management for IT-related Projects (Second Edition) ? M & A Integration: How to do it ? Pegasus: The Seminal Early Computer ? The Computer Incident Response Planning Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information at Risk ? Interop The Promise; Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems ? Business continuity management systems

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

REVIEW:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Computers Reviewers, 2011 Stefan Agamanolis, United Kingdom Rosa Alarcon, Chile Frances Aldrich, United Kingdom Jason Alexander, United Kingdom Norman Alm, United Kingdom Analia Amandi, Argentina Chee Siang Ang, United Kingdom Alissa Antle......

Reviewers; Editors Appreciation 2011

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

Technical Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Technical Guidance, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security develops and issues Government-wide and Department-wide technical guidance to ensure that classified nuclear...

245

Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: Current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Desalination capacity has rapidly increased in the last decade because of the increase in water demand and a significant reduction in desalination cost as a result of significant technological advances, especially in the reverse osmosis process. The cost of desalinated seawater has fallen below US$0.50/m3 for a large scale seawater reverse osmosis plant at a specific location and conditions while in other locations the cost is 50% higher (US$1.00/m3) for a similar facility. In addition to capital and operating costs, other parameters such as local incentives or subsidies may also contribute to the large difference in desalted water cost between regions and facilities. Plant suppliers and consultants have their own cost calculation methodologies, but they are confidential and provide water costs with different accuracies. The few existing costing methodologies and software packages such as WTCost and DEEP provide an estimated cost with different accuracies and their applications are limited to specific conditions. Most of the available cost estimation tools are of the black box type, which provide few details concerning the parameters and methodologies applied for local conditions. Many desalination plants built recently have greater desalinated water delivery costs caused by special circumstances, such as plant remediation or upgrades, local variation in energy costs, and site-specific issues in raw materials costs (e.g., tariffs and transportation). Therefore, the availability of a more transparent and unique methodology for estimating the cost will help in selecting an appropriate desalination technology suitable for specific locations with consideration of all the parameters influencing the cost. A techno-economic evaluation and review of the costing aspects and the main parameters influencing the total water cost produced by different desalination technologies are herein presented in detail. Some recent developments, such as the increase of unit capacity, improvements in process design and materials, and the use of hybrid systems have contributed to cost reduction as well as reduction in energy consumption. The development of new and emerging low-energy desalination technologies, such as adsorption desalination, will have an impact on cost variation estimation in the future.

Noreddine Ghaffour; Thomas M. Missimer; Gary L. Amy

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by............................................................................................................................................ 1 SELECTION OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS .............................................................................................................................. 2 TECHNICAL EXPERTISE OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS

247

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

report by June 20; a meeting will be held to discuss the report on June 23. Tom said the review was to examine Hanford and the 2020 Vision. Tom reviewed the current activities at...

248

Technical Review Report for the Model 9978-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00002, Revision 1, March 2009)  

SciTech Connect

This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE), on the 'Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), Model 9978 B(M)F-96', Revision 1, March 2009 (S-SARP-G-00002). The Model 9978 Package complies with 10 CFR 71, and with 'Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material-1996 Edition (As Amended, 2000)-Safety Requirements', International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9978 Packaging is designed, analyzed, fabricated, and tested in accordance with Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&PVC). The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the DOE's 'Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages'. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., 'Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material'. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9978 Packaging is a single containment package, using a 5-inch containment vessel (5CV). It uses a nominal 35-gallon drum package design. In comparison, the Model 9977 Packaging uses a 6-inch containment vessel (6CV). The Model 9977 and Model 9978 Packagings were developed concurrently, and they were referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package, Version 1 (GPFP). Both packagings use General Plastics FR-3716 polyurethane foam as insulation and as impact limiters. The 5CV is used as the Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) in the Model 9975-96 Packaging. The Model 9975-96 Packaging also has the 6CV as its Secondary Containment Vessel (SCV). In comparison, the Model 9975 Packagings use Celotex{trademark} for insulation and as impact limiters. To provide a historical perspective, it is noted that the Model 9975-96 Packaging is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then-newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The Model 9978 Package has six Content Envelopes: C.1 ({sup 238}Pu Heat Sources), C.2 ( Pu/U Metals), C.3 (Pu/U Oxides, Reserved), C.4 (U Metal or Alloy), C.5 (U Compounds), and C.6 (Samples and Sources). Per 10 CFR 71.59 (Code of Federal Regulations), the value of N is 50 for the Model 9978 Package leading to a Criticality Safety Index (CSI) of 1.0. The Transport Index (TI), based on dose rate, is calculated to be a maximum of 4.1.

West, M

2009-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

249

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

taken out of context to extrapolate Board agreement on other subject matters. cc: Scott Samuelson, Manager, U. S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection Stacy...

250

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

taken out of context to extrapolate Board agreement on other subject matters. cc: Scott Samuelson, Manager, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection Dana Bryson,...

251

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

taken out of context to extrapolate Board agreement on other subject matters. cc: Scott Samuelson, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection Stacy Charboneau, Deputy...

252

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

other materials requiring macroencapsulation treatment to meet Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Land Disposal Restrictions prior to disposal, the Board provides the...

253

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas Production Posts Draft Report Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas Production Posts Draft Report November 10, 2011 - 1:12pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas Production released its second and final ninety-day report reviewing the progress that has been made in implementing the twenty recommendations in its initial report of August 18, 2011. The Subcommittee was tasked with producing a report on the immediate steps that can be taken to improve the safety and environmental performance of shale gas development. The Subcommittee believes that these recommendations, if implemented, would help to assure that the nation's considerable shale

254

December 3, 2003, Board Public Meeting Speaker Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

F F Testimony of William L. Hicks Before the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board December 3,2003 Thank you Mr. Chairman for this opportunity to provide some thoughts for the consideration of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) as you review the status of DOE, including NNSA, oversight and management of contracts and contractors. As noted in the notice of this series of public meetings, t'he Board "will focus on what impacts, if any, DOE's new initiatives may have or might have had upon assuring adequate protection of the health and safety of the public and workers at DOE's defense nuclear facilities." My experience includes 30 years in the Navy nuclear program and over 12 years within the DOE and NNSA complex associated with operations, oversight,

255

Outgoing Board Correspondence - Hanford Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hedges Board Diversity and Other Effectiveness Issues 122012 David Huizenga, Scott Samuelson, and Matt McCormick Tank Closure and Waste Management Final Environmental Impact...

256

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

a committee charged with identifying future technology needs for offshore oil and gas development. Dr. Hunter serves on many advisory boards for universities and government...

257

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Board will provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on the Department's basic and applied research and development activities, economic and national security policy,...

258

Hanford Advisory Board Page 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

June 6-7, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 6-7, 2013 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ......

259

Hanford Advisory Board Page 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

February 7-8, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD February 7-8, 2013 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary ......

260

Computer Science and Telecommunications Board summary of activities  

SciTech Connect

The Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB) considers technical and policy issues pertaining to computer science, telecommunications, and associated technologies. CSTB actively disseminates the results of its completed projects to those in a position to help implement their recommendations or otherwise use their insights. It provides a forum for the exchange of information on computer science, computing technology, and telecommunications. This report discusses the major accomplishments of CSTB.

Blumenthal, M.S.

1992-03-27T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Microcomputer-based on-board tractor performance monitor  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, the Center for Energy and Mineral Resources, and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station is gratefully recognized. An additional thank you is extended to Deere '8 Company for providing a tractor and generous technical assistance for the pro/act. Dickey...NICROCONPUTER-BASED ON-BOARD TRACTOR PERFORNANCE NONITOR A Thesis DAVID ALAN NORRIS Submitted to the Graduate College of Texas ASM University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BASTER OF SCIENCE December 1984 Sapor...

Morris, David Alan

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

262

State Oil and Gas Board State Oil and Gas Board Address Place...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Board State Oil and Gas Board Address Place Zip Website Alabama Oil and Gas Board Alabama Oil and Gas Board Hackberry Lane Alabama http www gsa state al us ogb ogb html Alaska...

263

High Level Waste Corporate Board Charter | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

High Level Waste Corporate Board Charter High Level Waste Corporate Board Charter High Level Waste Corporate Board Charter More Documents & Publications Corporate Board By-Laws...

264

Sandia Combustion Research: Technical review  

SciTech Connect

This report contains reports from research programs conducted at the Sandia Combustion Research Facility. Research is presented under the following topics: laser based diagnostics; combustion chemistry; reacting flow; combustion in engines and commercial burners; coal combustion; and industrial processing. Individual projects were processed separately for entry onto the DOE databases.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Technical information  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Home> Commercial Buildings Home> Technical Information > Estimation of Standard Errors Estimation of Standard Errors Sampling error is the difference between the survey estimate...

266

Technical Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Dec 12, 2013 ... Technical Report Series: DCC-2013-13. Departamento de Cincia de Computadores. Faculdade de Cincias da Universidade do Porto.

Filipe Brandao

2013-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

267

ULTRANS BOARD OF ADVISORS Biographies  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ULTRANS BOARD OF ADVISORS Biographies GREGG ALBRIGHT California Business, Transportation moved to Sacramento. #12;ULTRANS Board of Advisors Biographies ULTRANS BOA Meeting Page 2 September 23, and Papers in Regional Science. DALE BONNER Cal-Infra Advisors, INC. Dale Bonner is founder of Cal

California at Davis, University of

268

Aalto University Foundation Board Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Aalto University Foundation Board Report and Financial Statements #12;Board Report 2010 4­21 Introduction 4 Purpose of the Foundation 5 Governance 6 Research, Education, and Artistic Activities 7 Sheet 24­25 Group Cash Flow Statement 26­27 Foundation Profit and Loss Account 28­29 Foundation Balance

Kaski, Samuel

269

Industrial Engineering Industrial Advisory Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Industrial Engineering Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) #12;PURPOSE: The Texas Tech University - Industrial Engineering Industrial Ad- visory Board (IAB) is an association of professionals with a com- mon goal - promoting and developing the Texas Tech Department of Industrial Engineering and its students

Gelfond, Michael

270

STUDENT HEARING BOARD 20132014 APPLICATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD 2013­2014 APPLICATION INTEGRITY,CIVILITY,&CONDUCT:FOSTERINGASAFECAMPUSCOMMUNITY #12;UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD I 2013­2014 APPLICATION To serve the UMBC community and the individual student by specifying behavioral standards, and by establishing a fair and efficient process

Maryland, Baltimore County, University of

271

STUDENT HEARING BOARD 20122013 APPLICATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD 2012­2013 APPLICATION INTEGRITY,CIVILITY,&CONDUCT:FOSTERINGASAFECAMPUSCOMMUNITY #12;UMBC STUDENT HEARING BOARD I 2012­2013 APPLICATION To serve the UMBC community and the individual student by specifying behavioral standards, and by establishing a fair and efficient process

Maryland, Baltimore County, University of

272

BOARD OF GOVERNORS Investment Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BOARD OF GOVERNORS Investment Committee Terms of Reference Purpose The purpose of the Investment by the Board from time to time. Composition The Investment Committee shall be composed of not less than three) developing appropriate investment policies and objectives; (c) monitoring investment performance against

Brownstone, Rob

273

IEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

should use as a tool to evaluate as part of the planning process. Economic, political, socialIEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board Daniel D. Huppert, Chair Lon L. Peters, Vice-Chair Joel R and Guidance for Economic Analysis in Subbasin Planning Independent Economic Analysis Board January 2003

274

Technology Innovation Program Advisory Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technology Innovation Program Advisory Board 2009 Annual Report of the #12;2009 Annual Report of the Technology Innovation Program Advisory Board U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Innovation Program February 2010 #12;For Information regarding the Technology

Magee, Joseph W.

275

General purpose programmable accelerator board  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A general purpose accelerator board and acceleration method comprising use of: one or more programmable logic devices; a plurality of memory blocks; bus interface for communicating data between the memory blocks and devices external to the board; and dynamic programming capabilities for providing logic to the programmable logic device to be executed on data in the memory blocks.

Robertson, Perry J. (Albuquerque, NM); Witzke, Edward L. (Edgewood, NM)

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Corporate Board By-Laws  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2011 May 2011 By-Laws Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board Article 1 Name The name shall be the Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance (QA) Corporate Board (hereafter referred to as the Board). Article 2 Mission The Board will serve a leadership role within EM for facilitating, championing, and overseeing the effectiveness of a consistent and graded approach to implementing the corporate QA program, policies and requirements, and disseminating lessons learned and best practices such that a consistent and effective approach to quality is obtained through independently managed federal and contractor QA Programs. The Board will serve as a consensus-building body to facilitate institutionalization of a streamlined and efficient QA

277

Report: Technical Uncertainty and Risk Reduction  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY AND RISK REDUCTION TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY AND RISK REDUCTION Background In FY 2007 EMAB was tasked to assess EM's ability to reduce risk and technical uncertainty. Board members explored this topic throughout the year as a component of their focus on the previously discussed topic of Discretionary Budgeting. Discussion Understanding the risks and variability associated with EM's projects is a challenging task that has the potential to significantly impact the program's established baselines. According to budget personnel, EM has established a database of baseline variables and possibilities; however, this tool is project-specific and does not apply to the greater complex. The Board believes that EM could benefit from incorporating an additional and more comprehensive data point into the baseline development process that budgets

278

Fish Passage Center Oversight Board 1 December 13, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Minutes for December 13, 2010 ­ Portland, Oregon Participants at the Council's office and by phone: Bruce Oversight Board (FPCOB) chairman Bruce Measure called the meeting to order at 1:35 p.m. and asked, DeHart said. This is the first year we held an annual review on the CSS, she said. The FPC got lots

279

BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER FINANCE CORPORATION Monday, 2012 SPECIAL MEETING. * 2. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS TO CREATE A UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT CONNECTICUT - AMBULATORY CARE CENTER.* 7. APPROVAL OF THE WRITE-OFF OF UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS FOR THE JOHN

Oliver, Douglas L.

280

Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Management Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) MISSION The mission of the Environmental Management Advisory Board is to provide independent and external advice, information, and recommendations to the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory December 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory

282

Enterprise Assessments Review, West Valley Demonstration Project December 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness

283

Alternative Energy Development Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: Alternative Energy Development Board Place: Islamabad, Pakistan Product: Islamabad-based autonomous body under the Ministry of Water and...

284

Advisory Board 2014-15 External Committee  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Board Advisory Board 2014-15 External Committee IMS Advisory Panel Gabriel Aeppli (ETH Zurich, Paul Scherer Institute) Peter Littlewood (ANL Director) Diran Apelian (WPI)...

285

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Oregon), will serve as vice chair. Pam said RAP has been heavily involved in the review of the TC&WM EIS and working with the Committee Of The Whole (COTW). At the March 9...

286

Colorado School of Mines Office of the Treasurer, Board of Trustees  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Colorado School of Mines Office of the Treasurer, Board of Trustees Internal Audit Charter Introduction The Department of Internal Audit is established within the Colorado School of Mines audit provides analyses, recommendations, counsel and information concerning the activities reviewed

287

Department of Energy Technical Standards Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Technical Standards Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Department of Energy Technical Standards Program The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE. Online Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Archive Monthly Status Reports Subscribe RSS logo Subscribe to receive the latest DOE Approved Technical Standards via an RSS feed. Take Action Write, revise, or maintain a DOE Technical Standard Review a DOE Technical Standard at RevCom for TSP Additional Information Technical Standards Program Information

288

December 4, 2003, Board Public Meeting - Board Member Opening Remarks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Armed Services Committee made reference to the goals Armed Services Committee made reference to the goals that they were setting for the Board. The "basic goals," and I ' m quoting now from its report, "The basic goals in establishing an independent safety oversight board are to assure and enhance the safety of operations of DOE's nuclear facilities, and to restore public confidence that these facilities are operated without undue risk to public health and safety. " Now the report set forth, of course, a number of responsibilities given to the Board, but the report also went on to say, "Above all, the Board should be instrumental in restoring public confidence in DOE's management capabilities, a clear prerequisite for the continued production of the nuclear materials vital to the nation's security."

289

International Oil and Gas Board International Oil and Gas Board...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Oil and Gas Board Address Place Zip Website Abu Dhabi Supreme Petroleum Council Abu Dhabi Supreme Petroleum Council Abu Dhabi http www abudhabi ae egovPoolPortal WAR appmanager...

290

October 21, 2003, Board Public Meeting - One Page Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1, 2003) 1, 2003) Issues raised in Board staff testimony: * High performing organizations have independent and technically competent engineering enterprises that centrally control technical safety specifications and expectations, including technical waivers. * Redundancy in systems, whether physical or human systems, can improve overall system reliability. * DOE Oversight practices should ensure that contractors use appropriate decision-making criteria regarding safety in light of incentive-based contract structure. * DOE use of performance metrics alone is not expected to provide adequate leading indicators of safety problems, and does not address root causes, corrective actions, and verification that corrective actions have been effective. * Independent information (beyond data generated by contractors and field offices) is necessary to allow senior

291

ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 And TQP Assessment Crads 11 2012 Smooth (2) 1 11/29/12 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION AND FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROGRAMS This document provides guidance and objectives and criteria to support assessments required by DOE O 426.1 Federal Technical Capability (FTC), Section 4. REQUIREMENTS, paragraph b. FTC Program Implementation, subparagraph (7) Self- Assessment. This FTC Order paragraph requires self-assessment of TQP and FTC Program implementation within one's organization. To ensure effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP), Headquarters and field elements conduct self-assessments of these programs. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self-assessments and determines if further action is

292

Warped geometry speeds airline boarding  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... To try to improve the efficiency of the boarding process, aerospace companies such as Boeing use computer simulations in which each passenger takes their seat after performing activities such as ...

Philip Ball

2005-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

293

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force Report to Support the Evaluation of New Funding Constructs for Energy R&D in the DOE March 28, 2014 U.S. Department of Energy Page 2...

294

Extension Program Council's Executive Board.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

~IB-134'-! II"I~ I~? Extension Program Council's Executive Board Mary G. Marshall and Burl B. Richardson Extension Program Development Specialists The Extension Program Council works with Extension agents to plan, implement, evaluate... direction and scope of all educa tionallong-range plan activity. Since Extension does not have the resources to address every issue or need, long-range planning establishes priorities among the issues. The Executive Board has responsibility...

Marshall, Mary G.; Richardson, Burl B.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

QA Corporate Board Meeting- October 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Board minutes, agenda, and presentations from meeting held on October 27, 2014 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

296

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS STUDY RESULTS  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this report is to review technical specifications for emergency diesel generators in the context of new information developed in the Nuclear Plant Aging Research Program and the application of current NRC regulatory concepts and knowledge. Aging and reliability relationships related to the standard technical specifications are reviewed and supported by data and published information to ensure that conservative and beneficial specifications are identified. Where technical specifications could adversely influence aging and reliability, the technical issues and reasonable alternatives are identified for consideration. This report documents and spans the technical progress from the published and approved regulatory documents to the current knowledge basis. This ensures that the technical bases for the technical specifications discussed are documented and relatively complete subject information is contained in one document. The Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) has participated in the Nuclear Plant Aging Research (NPAR) Program directed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Division of Engineering. The NPAR study of emergency diesel generator aging was performed in two phases. In Phase I, plant operating experience, ~ata, expert opinion and statistical methods were used to produce a new data base related to aging, reliability, and operational readiness of nuclear service diesel generators. Phase II was chiefly concerned with aging mitigation measures.

Hoopingarner, K. R.

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Technical Assessment of Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tank Systems for Automotive Applications  

Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

This technical report describes DOE's assessment of the performance and cost of compressed hydrogen storage tank systems for automotive applications. The on-board performance (by Argonne National Lab)

298

Technical Assessment of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tank Systems for Automotive Applications  

Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

Technical report describing DOE's second assessment report on a third generation (Gen3) system capable of storing hydrogen at cryogenic temperatures within a pressure vessel on-board a vehicle. The re

299

Tank Waste Corporate Board | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tank Waste Corporate Board Tank Waste Corporate Board Tank Waste Corporate Board The Tank Waste Corporate Board is a chartered group of senior DOE, contractor, and laboratory managers and staff that meets approximately semi-annually to formulate and coordinate implementation of an effective and efficient national Tank Waste program. August 1, 2012 Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 08/01/12 The following documents are associated with the Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting held on August 1st, 2012. November 18, 2010 Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 11/18/10 The following documents are associated with the Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting held on November 18th, 2010. July 29, 2009 Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 07/29/09 The following documents are associated with the Tank Waste Corporate Board

300

ANNUAL REVIEW FACTSHEET WORKFLOW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that the PhD has updated his T&SP (15. Second annual review). The PhD and the Promotor have to plan a date for the second annual review and the PhD has to enter that date in ProDoc (20 Date second annual review plannedANNUAL REVIEW FACTSHEET WORKFLOW PhD Candidate / Promotor / Dean / TGS / Doctorate Board / Pro

Twente, Universiteit

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support (TNPS), Nonproliferation and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support (TNPS) Nonproliferation & National Security (NPNS) Overview Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support Strategic Trade Control Review of export license applications Multilateral Export Control Arrangements Interdiction Engagement & Training INECP INSEP GIPP Safeguards Concepts and Approaches Human Capital Development Additional Protocol Technical Assistance National Security Systems & Assessments National Security Information Systems Vulnerability Assessment Team (VAT) Radiation Detection & Response (RDR) Contact NPNS Other Major Programs Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE Division on Flickr Nonproliferation and National Security Program Technical Nonproliferation Policy Support (TNPS)

302

Office of Health, Safety and Security Follow-up Review of the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review Board William A. Eckroade John S. Boulden III Thomas R. Staker George E. Armstrong Michael A. Kilpatrick Review Team Thomas R. Staker, Team Leader Marvin J. Mielke...

303

Coordinating rooks and bishops: an institutional history of the joint army and navy board, 1903-1919  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and coordination during this period receive no more than peripheral analysis in war plan studies. The first historian to make any mention of the Joint Board was diplomatic historian Fred Greene in his January 1961 American Historical Review article ?The 5... Wilson presidency, the Board had become ?unimportant.? Due to the broad scope of the essay, Morton did not provide extensive analysis into why the Joint Board experienced such a dramatic decline in its influence. 5 Morton contributed an important...

Godin, Jason Robert

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998 The Department's Revised Implementation Plan (IP) for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-3 renews the Department's commitment to maintaining the technical capability necessary to safely manage and operate defense nuclear facilities. Retaining highly qualified employees in critical technical skills areas is vital to the maintenance of these technical capabilities. The Department has therefore committed in the revised R? to the development of a model that offices can use to proactively manage and preserve critical technical capabilities. During the

305

Quality Assurance Corporate Board | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance » Quality Quality Assurance » Quality Assurance Corporate Board Quality Assurance Corporate Board The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance Corporate Board is an executive board that includes both senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor representatives who are involved with construction, operating, and decommissioning projects. The Board acts in an advisory capacity to the EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Safety and Security Program, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board. Decisions on the Corporate Board's recommendations are acted on by EM senior management. The Corporate Board provides the management structure to integrate the independently managed federal and contractor Quality Assurance Programs into a single corporate entity. The Board serves as a consensus-building

306

Review of the Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Proect, July 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Long Lead Procurement Processes Used by Long Lead Procurement Processes Used by Babcock &Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 July 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1

307

Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8 8 Varnish cache server Browse Upload data GDR 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142279738 Varnish cache server Technical Reference and Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials Dataset Summary Description Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of MaterialsGuidance on materials selection for hydrogen service is needed to support the deployment of hydrogen as a fuel as well as the development of codes and standards for stationary hydrogen use, hydrogen vehicles, refueling stations, and hydrogen transportation. Materials property measurement is needed on deformation, fracture and fatigue of metals in environments relevant to this hydrogen economy infrastructure. The identification of hydrogen-affected material properties such as strength, fracture resistance and fatigue resistance are high priorities to ensure the safe design of load-bearing structures.To support the needs of the hydrogen community, Sandia National Laboratories is conducting an extensive review of reports and journal publications to gather existing materials data for inclusion in the Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials. Additionally, Sandia is working internationally with collaborators to acquire newly generated data for inclusion in the Technical Reference. SAND2012-7321 is an archival report issued by Sandia National Laboratories representing the reference information compiled as of September 2012. Updates and additions of individual sections of this report are available at http://www.sandia.gov/matlsTechRef.Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of MaterialsThe Technical Database for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials is intended to be a complement to the Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials. Although still in the development stage, the Technical Database will provide a repository of technical data measured in hydrogen and is meant to be an engineering tool to aid the selection of materials for use in hydrogen.

308

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Engagement Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board 2014 ORSSAB board members are pictured with representatives from DOE and TDEC. 2014...

309

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Meetings | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Meetings Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Meetings Board Meeting Documents Available for Download January 15, 2015 ORSSAB Meeting - November 2014 Discussion of board...

310

PP-226 Brownsville public Utilities Board | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Brownsville public Utilities Board PP-226 Brownsville public Utilities Board Presidential permit authorizing Brownsville public Utilities Board to construct, operate, and...

311

High-Level Waste Corporate Board Presentation Archive | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

High-Level Waste Corporate Board Presentation Archive High-Level Waste Corporate Board Presentation Archive Archived Documents High-Level Waste Corporate Board, Dr. Ins Triay...

312

November 21, 2006, Board letter providing feedback on the 2004-1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

November 21, 2006 November 21, 2006 The Honorable Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-1000 Dear Secretary Bodman: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) received your letter of October 12, 2006, enclosing the revised Implementation Plan (IP) for the Board’s Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations. The Board has reviewed the IP and finds it to be responsive to the Recommendation. The Board would also like to take this opportunity to close Recommendation 95-2, Safety Management. The Recommendation 2004-1 IP and the recently issued Department of Energy (DOE) Manual 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual, contain the actions necessary to reinvigorate Integrated Safety Management (ISM). In addition, DOE has taken an

313

December 4, 2003, Board Public Meeting Speaker Presentations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TM TM Westinghouse Savannah River Company "Assessment Program" Presentation to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board R. A. Pedde 12/4/03 TM 2 Overview WSRC Assessment Program Line Oversight/Contractor Assurance System Technical Staffing Corrective Action Program Program Enhancements Closing Remarks Questions & Answers TM 3 Assessment Program WSRC Recognizes that a Robust Assessment Program is Key to: ⎟ Meeting the Integrated Safety Management System's Requirements and Expectations for "Feedback & Improvement" ⎟ Meeting the Requirements of the Quality Assurance Rule and Order, ⎟ Identifying and Correcting Precursor Problems Before a More Serious Incident Occurs, and, ⎟ Ensuring Continuous Improvement Throughout the Organization

314

Review of technical justification of assumptions and methods used by the Environmental Protection Agency for estimating risks avoided by implementing MCLs for radionuclides  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed regulations for allowable levels of radioactive material in drinking water (40 CFR Part 141, 56 FR 33050, July 18, 1991). This review examined the assumptions and methods used by EPA in calculating risks that would be avoided by implementing the proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels for uranium, radium, and radon. Proposed limits on gross alpha and beta-gamma emitters were not included in this review.

Morris, S.C.; Rowe, M.D.; Holtzman, S.; Meinhold, A.F.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan. SSO TQP...

316

August 1, 2003, Board announcement of a Public Meeting on the Department of Energy oversight - September 10, 2003  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

§ 552b), § 552b), notice is hereby given of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's (Board) meeting described below. The Board will also conduct a series of public hearings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §2286b and invites any interested persons or groups to present any comments, technical information, or data concerning safety issues related to the matters to be considered. TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 9:00 - 12:00 a.m., September 10, 2003. PLACE: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public Hearing Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004-2001. Additionally, as a part of the Board's E-Government initiative, the meeting will be presented live through Internet video streaming. A link to this presentation will be available on the home page of the

317

Review of the Los Alamos Site Office Safety System Oversight...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Review Board William Eckroade John Boulden Thomas Staker Michael Kilpatrick George Armstrong Robert Nelson Independent Oversight Site Lead for LANL Robert Freeman Independent...

318

Office of Enterprse Assessments Review of the West Valley Demonstratio...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Deputy Director, Office of Enterprise Assessments Thomas R. Staker, Director, Office of Environment, Safety and Health Assessments Quality Review Board William A. Eckroade Thomas...

319

IEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, (2) on-farm efficiency to reduce irrigation water use, (3) a new pump station on the Okanogan River of Instream Water Supply Components of the Salmon Creek Project Independent Economic Analysis Board Northwest district to continue water delivery to its users. The Proposed Project includes (1) improved water control

320

IEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Estuary (Buoy 10) Figure 7: The Fisheries Economic Assessment Model Process Figure 8: Columbia RiverIEAB Independent Economic Analysis Board Roger Mann, Chair Noelwah R. Netusil, Vice-Chair Kenneth L. Casavant Daniel D. Huppert Joel R. Hamilton Lon L. Peters Susan S. Hanna Hans Radtke A I - 1 Economic

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Biosecurity Programme Board Silvan House  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

;Biosecurity Programme Board 6) Question of funding assistance for restocking on sites issued with a PH notice: Roger Coppock would convene a meeting with country reps to take this forward. 4. Tree Health and Plant. Action: Jon Heuch would contact tree officers to explore whether P. lateralis was something

322

Insulation board and process of making  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

Insulation board capable of bearing a load without significant loss of insulating capacity due to compression, produced by a method wherein the board is made in compliance with specified conditions of time, temperature and pressure.

Nowobilski, Jeffert J. (Orchard Park, NY); Owens, William J. (Kenmore, NY)

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON BOARD OF TRUSTEES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Kassebaum, Secretary to the Board of Trustees; Gail Long, Internal Auditor; Monica Scott, VP for Facilities of the Board to focus his time and energy on his family and business interests. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS

Kasman, Alex

324

OFFICE OF THE CHANCELLOR Board of Governors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Carolina Thomas W. Ross Chancellor The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Holden Thorp BoardOFFICE OF THE CHANCELLOR Board of Governors Chair Peter Hans President The University of North

Whitton, Mary C.

325

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Meetings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Lists links to the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Meetings. The links provide meeting documents available for download.

326

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Contacts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Lists Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board contact information including mailing address, phone numbers, and contact email addresses.

327

Review of state-of-the-art of solar collector corrosion processes. Task 1 of solar collector studies for solar heating and cooling applications. Final technical progress report  

SciTech Connect

The state-of-the-art of solar collector corrosion processes is reviewed, and Task 1 of a current research program on use of aqueous heat transfer fluids for solar heating and cooling is summarized. The review of available published literature has indicated that lack of quantitative information exists relative to collector corrosion at the present time, particularly for the higher temperature applications of solar heating and cooling compared to domestic water heating. Solar collector systems are reviewed from the corrosion/service life viewpoint, with emphasis on various applications, collector design, heat transfer fluids, and freeze protection methods. Available information (mostly qualitative) on collector corrosion technology is reviewed to indicate potential corrosion problem areas and corrosion prevention practices. Sources of limited quantitative data that are reviewed are current solar applications, research programs on collector corrosion, and pertinent experience in related applications of automotive cooling and non-solar heating and cooling. A data bank was developed to catalog corrosion information. Appendix A of this report is a bibliography of the data bank, with abstracts reproduced from presently available literature accessions (about 220). This report is presented as a descriptive summary of information that is contained in the data bank.

Clifford, J E; Diegle, R B

1980-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

328

environmental health The Local Board of Health  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

environmental health The Local Board of Health Environmental Health Primer Second Edition #12;The Local Board of Health Environmental Health Primer Second Edition Author Carrie Hribar, MA Project Director � Public Health Policy National Association of Local Boards of Health Editor Mark Schultz, MEd

329

Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report  

SciTech Connect

This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Funding Board Application Please submit your application, resume, and a cover letter to an ASMSU Administrative Assistant in  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Funding Board Application 2014-2015 Please submit your application, resume, and a cover letter will not be reviewed without a resume and a cover letter. (Please Print) Date:____________________________ Name

Maxwell, Bruce D.

331

Risk-assessment-methodology development for waste isolation in geologic media. Technical review of documents NUREG/CR-0394, NUREG/CR-0424, NUREG/CR-0458  

SciTech Connect

A review of five documents that were prepared for the USNRC by Sandia Laboratories is presented in this report. The documents covered in the present review include: NUREG/CR-1262, NUREG/CR-1376, NUREG/CR-1377, NUREG/CR-1397 and NUREG/CR-1608. This constitutes the second phase of the review; the first phase was reported in Volume 1 of NUREG/CR-1672, November 1980. Two of the documents concern simplified computational methods illustrative of the calculations necessary to produce a response surface. Three of the reports pertain to statistical methods, including the application of Latin hypercube Sampling (LHS). The following observations have been made relative to the above reports: (1) the reports are, in general, difficult to read, due, in part, to unnecessarily complicated notation and lack of adequate explanation and examples, (2) the relationship of the work to similar work in the US and abroad is not discussed, and (3) limitations of the LHS method are not discussed in sufficient depth. The Sandia's response to this review is published as NUREG/CR-2428. Volume 1 is scheduled for completion in June 1982.

Stevens, C.A.; Fullwood, R.R.; Basin, S.L.

1980-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

December 22, 1998, Board announcement of public meeting scheduled for February 3, 1998, regarding Recommendations 95-2 and 93-3.  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 '9E ~4:25Pfl P.2 3670-01 DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD Pursuant to the provision of the "Government in the Sunshine Act" (5 U.S.C. ~ 552b), notice is hereby given of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's (Board) meeting described below. TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 9:00 a.m., February 3, 1999. PLACE: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public Hearing Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004. STATUS: Open. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board will convene the ninth quarterly briefing regarding the status of progress of the activities a&ociated with the Department of Energy's Implementation Plans for the Board's Recommendation 95-2, Megrated Safety Management ("ISM") and Recommendation 93-3, Improving DOE Technical Capability in Defense Nuclear Facilities Programs.

333

National Climate Assessment: Available Technical Inputs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Available Technical Inputs Print E-mail Available Technical Inputs Print E-mail Technical inputs for the 2013 National Climate Assessment were due March 1, 2012. Please note that these reports were submitted independently to the National Climate Assessment for consideration and have not been reviewed by the National Climate Assessment Development and Advisory Committee. Links to agency-sponsored reports will be posted here as they are made available. Sectors National Climate Assessment Health Sector Literature Review and Bibliography. Technical Input for the Interagency Climate Change and Human Health Group, September 2012. Overview Bibliography Bibliography User's Guide Search Strategy and Results Walthall et al. 2012. Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation. USDA Technical Bulletin 1935. Washington, DC. 186 pages. | Report FAQs

334

E-ELT Phase B Final Design Review September 21-24 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Plan, and System Engineering. At the same time, the Review Board was provided with more than 300 Plan and Construction Schedule, and during the review were given access to confidential documentsE-ELT Phase B Final Design Review September 21-24 2010 Report of the Review Board Introduction

Liske, Jochen

335

Prototype performance studies of a Full Mesh ATCA-based General Purpose Data Processing Board  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

High luminosity conditions at the LHC pose many unique challenges for potential silicon based track trigger systems. One of the major challenges is data formatting, where hits from thousands of silicon modules must first be shared and organized into overlapping eta-phi trigger towers. Communication between nodes requires high bandwidth, low latency, and flexible real time data sharing, for which a full mesh backplane is a natural solution. A custom Advanced Telecommunications Computing Architecture data processing board is designed with the goal of creating a scalable architecture abundant in flexible, non-blocking, high bandwidth board to board communication channels while keeping the design as simple as possible. We have performed the first prototype board testing and our first attempt at designing the prototype system has proven to be successful. Leveraging the experience we gained through designing, building and testing the prototype board system we are in the final stages of laying out the next generation board, which will be used in the ATLAS Level-2 Fast TracKer as Data Formatter, as well as in the CMS Level-1 tracking trigger R&D for early technical demonstrations.

Yasuyuki Okumura; Jamieson Olsen; Tiehui Ted Liu; Hang Yin

2014-03-18T23:59:59.000Z

336

A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper presents an overview of the technical and economic aspects, as well as the market evolution of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). This is an unconventional but very promising technology for the conversion of thermal energy, at low and medium temperatures, into electrical and/or mechanical energy on a small scale. As it makes a greater and/or more intensive use of its energy source, this technology could facilitate an electricity supply to unconnected areas, the self-production of energy, the desalination of seawater for human consumption, or even to increase the energy efficiency in the industrial sector respecting the environment. A look at the scientific publications on this topic shows an open research line, namely the selection of a suitable working fluid for these systems, since there is as yet none that provides all aspects that must be taken into account in ORCs. Furthermore, a description and an analysis of the applications of the proposed technology is carried out, specifying the main providers, which at the present time is limited mainly to the range 0.22MWe with a cost of around 1 and 4נ103/kWe. Lower powers are in pre-commercial status.

Fredy Vlez; Jos J. Segovia; M. Carmen Martn; Gregorio Antoln; Farid Chejne; Ana Quijano

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub May 14, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board Chairs Meeting in Paducah, where Huizenga spoke April 18. Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board

338

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub Students Imagine Paducah Site as Technical, Industrial Hub May 14, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board Chairs Meeting in Paducah, where Huizenga spoke April 18. Senior Advisor for Environmental Management Dave Huizenga, right, and Portsmouth-Paducah Project Office Manager Bill Murphie listen as UK College of Design graduate student Nate Owings, foreground, explains a Paducah site model. The model was displayed at the EM Site- Specific Advisory Board

339

GAO report recommends review of goals, objectives  

SciTech Connect

This article highlights a recent GAO study titled Nuclear Waste: Yucca Mountain Project Behind Schedule and Facing Major Scientific Uncertainties. The study was undertaken at the request of the former chairman of the Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation, the predecessor of the current Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Regulation of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. The report concludes that the level of funding DOE is requesting is not adequate to complete the goals of the project within the established timeline, and questions whether the changes being recommended by DOE to streamline the project will save money at the cost of safety. The GAO report recommends that the Secretary of Energy {open_quotes}...review the program`s goals and objectives in the context of the program`s priority for funding.{close_quotes} It also recommends that Congress not consider any funding changes until the Secretary`s report is in and an independent review by the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board is also available.

NONE

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

2015 GTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The annual Peer Review offers geothermal stakeholders an opportunity to learn about the projects funded by DOE across a wide spectrum of technical complexity and funding magnitude, from research...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Two stage fluid bed-plasma gasification process for solid waste valorisation: Technical review and preliminary thermodynamic modelling of sulphur emissions  

SciTech Connect

Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We investigate sulphur during MSW gasification within a fluid bed-plasma process. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We review the literature on the feed, sulphur and process principles therein. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer The need for research in this area was identified. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We perform thermodynamic modelling of the fluid bed stage. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Initial findings indicate the prominence of solid phase sulphur. - Abstract: Gasification of solid waste for energy has significant potential given an abundant feed supply and strong policy drivers. Nonetheless, significant ambiguities in the knowledge base are apparent. Consequently this study investigates sulphur mechanisms within a novel two stage fluid bed-plasma gasification process. This paper includes a detailed review of gasification and plasma fundamentals in relation to the specific process, along with insight on MSW based feedstock properties and sulphur pollutant therein. As a first step to understanding sulphur partitioning and speciation within the process, thermodynamic modelling of the fluid bed stage has been performed. Preliminary findings, supported by plant experience, indicate the prominence of solid phase sulphur species (as opposed to H{sub 2}S) - Na and K based species in particular. Work is underway to further investigate and validate this.

Morrin, Shane, E-mail: shane.morrin@ucl.ac.uk [Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE (United Kingdom); Advanced Plasma Power, South Marston Business park, Swindon, SN3 4DE (United Kingdom); Lettieri, Paola, E-mail: p.lettieri@ucl.ac.uk [Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE (United Kingdom); Chapman, Chris, E-mail: chris.chapman@app-uk.com [Advanced Plasma Power, South Marston Business park, Swindon, SN3 4DE (United Kingdom); Mazzei, Luca, E-mail: l.mazzei@ucl.ac.uk [Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE (United Kingdom)

2012-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

342

US DOE Perspectives on Advisory Board Effectiveness - 13539  

SciTech Connect

Federal missions on the Oak Ridge Reservation began with the Manhattan Project, and continues today with major facilities supporting the Nation's Science and National Security missions. While most of the land area on the Oak Ridge Reservation is free of environmental impacts from these activities, significant legacy contamination is associated with specific facilities and past waste management areas. In 1989, the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) was placed on National Priorities List, and DOE established its Office of Environmental Management that same year. Three years later, in 1992, the Federal Facility Agreement for the reservation was signed. Three years afterward, the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board was established to augment ongoing public involvement activities related to Oak Ridge Reservation cleanup activities. One of the early and most impactful decisions the board made was to organize the End Use Working Group. This broad-based group of board members, DOE representatives, and members of the public was formed in 1997 to study future uses for contaminated areas of the reservation. The group was instrumental in building consensus in the Oak Ridge community regarding the long-term end state of reservation lands. The group's recommendations were a fundamental input into Record's of Decision subsequently developed to establish cleanup requirements across the ORR, and they continue to influence decisions being made today. In developing its recommendations on end states, the End Use Working Group came to the realization that long-term stewardship of contaminated areas of the reservation would be necessary, in some cases in perpetuity. It was from this concept that the Oak Ridge SSAB's 15-year involvement in stewardship would begin. A stewardship committee formed by the End Use Working Group wrote Volume 1 of the Stakeholder Report on Stewardship. This document-and its companion Volume 2, which was written a year later-form a crucial foundation for stewardship planning in Oak Ridge and have been referenced around the DOE complex as other sites consider stewardship planning. From these two broad-based initiatives, the board's focus has evolved to increasingly hone in on more specific, project-based recommendations and initiatives. The Oak Ridge Reservation Site Specific Advisory Board has been a highly effective forum for soliciting community input on Oak Ridge Reservation cleanup. Experience in Oak Ridge indicates that the utility of Board recommendations is far higher when the Board is asked to focus on broad programmatic issues, and less useful when the Board attempts to provide advice and recommendations on matters related to technical or project management issues. In Oak Ridge the Board has helped shape the program on many levels including definition of end-state cleanup objectives, budget development, program sequencing, waste management, and decisions concerning preservation of history related to missions implemented on the Oak Ridge Reservation. (authors)

Adler, David [US DOE (United States)] [US DOE (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

BOARD OF GOVERNORS Audit Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

with the independent auditor to: - review the audit plan, including approach to evaluating internal control prior - review and approve annually, Internal Audit's risk-based audit plans; - review and approve the performance of the external auditors, (4) internal audit function, and (5) compliance with legal, regulatory

Brownstone, Rob

344

Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 03/05/09 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 03/05/09 Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 03/05/09 Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting 03/05/09 The following documents are associated with the Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting held on March 5th, 2009. Overview of Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Desired PU Loading During Vitrification HLW System Integrated Project Team Waste Determination and Section 3116 of the 2005 National Defense Authorization Act - HQ Perspective Status of Art & Practice of Performance Assessment within the DOE Complex Experience from the Short Course on Introduction to Nuclear Chemistry and Fuel Cycle Separations and Future Educational Opportunities Role of Liquid Waste Pretreatment Technologies in Solving the DOE Clean-up Mission Performance Assessment Community of Practice Action Item Review and Status

345

Texas Water Development Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Development Board Development Board Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Texas Water Development Board Name Texas Water Development Board Short Name TWDB Address 1700 North Congress Avenue Place Austin, Texas Zip 78701 Phone number 512-463-7847 Website http://www.twdb.state.tx.us/ References TWDB[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Texas Water Development Board is an organization based in Austin, Texas. The Texas Water Development Board's (TWDB) mission is to provide leadership, planning, financial assistance, information, and education for the conservation and responsible development of water for Texas. Our mission is a vital part of Texas' overall vision and its mission and goals which relate to maintaining the viability of the state's natural resources,

346

High Level Waste Corporate Board Charter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on 24 July 2008 1 on 24 July 2008 1 Office of Environmental Management High-Level Waste Corporate Board Charter Purpose This Charter establishes the High- Level Waste (HLW) Corporate Board, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') within the Office of Environmental Management (EM). The Board will serve as a consensus building body to integrate the Department of Energy (DOE) HLW management and disposition activities across the EM program and, with the coordination and cooperation of other program offices, across the DOE complex. The Board will identify the need for and develop policies, planning, standards and guidance and provide the integration necessary to implement an effective and efficient national HLW program. The Board will also evaluate the implications of HLW issues and their

347

Other Board Communications Letter from B. John Garrick to Robert R. Loux, Executive Director, Agency for Nuclear Projects,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

falsified documents related to work at the Yucca Mountain site. The second purpose identified the significance for the technical work at Yucca Mountain of the group of redacted e-mails that were posted summarizing areas of progress in the Yucca Mountain program; issues that, in the Board's view, require

348

2015 Peer Review Agenda for the Geothermal Technologies Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Energy Department's Geothermal Technologies Office hosts its 2015 Peer Review on May 11-14, 2015, with a rigorous review of the technical project portfolio.

349

HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Participation (CRESP) Risk Evaluation Report, "Methodology for the Hanford Site-wide Risk Review Project." Inasmuch as several affected governments have submitted detailed...

350

INL Technical Publications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technical Publications This site contains Idaho National Laboratory scientific and technical information products that have been issued for unlimited distribution. Those products...

351

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington, D.C. 20585 Washington, D.C. 20585 April 25, 2013 2 Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board - April 25, 2013 Meeting Minutes LIST OF ACRONYMS AB - Advisory Board ANL - Argonne National Laboratory ARP - Accelerator Retrieval Project BNL - Brookhaven National Laboratory BRC - Blue Ribbon Commission CAB - Citizens Advisory Board D&D - Decontamination & Decommissioning DDFO - Deputy Designated Federal Officer DOE - Department of Energy DUF6 - Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride DWPF - Defense Waste Processing Facility EIS - Environmental Impact Statement EM - DOE Office of Environmental Management EM SSAB - DOE Office of Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FY - Fiscal Year

352

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Committees  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Oak Ridges Site Specific Advisory Board uses its committee structure to achieve its mission and conduct many of its tasks.

353

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Additional Off-site Groundwater Migration Studies At our May 14, 2014, meeting, the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board approved the enclosed recommendations on additional...

354

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Recommendations on Additional Waste Disposal Capacity on the Oak Ridge Reservation At our May 14, 2014, meeting, the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board approved the enclosed...

355

Hanford Advisory Board 2013 Program of Work  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Draft *** Draft Hanford Advisory Board 2013 Program of Work Page 4 of 9 Topic Relevant Document or Decision? Policy Level Question Action 1 Committee Assignment When?...

356

The Texas Agricultural Cooperative Board Chairman.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

- - -- 24 54 22 100 12 17 71 100 All 33 36 31 100 Today's average Texas agricultural cooperative board chairman was a coop erative member for 9 years before being elected to the board. He then served on the board for 8 years before being... from Co-ops 50 to 79 80 to 90 90 to 100 Total Under 48 32 39 29 100 Age 48 to 58 59 and Over - - - - Percent - - - - 29 23 48 100 19 40 41 100 All 26 35 39 100 Seventy percent of the board chairmen marketed all...

Black, William E.; Knutson, Ronald D.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA Pacific Northwest...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Site Welcome Doug Shoop, Richland Operations Office Site Deputy Manager Kevin Smith, Office of River Protection Site Manager Susan Leckband, Hanford Advisory Board...

358

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Staff Paducah Citizens Advisory Board: Ben Peterson, Chair, Judy Clayton, Member; Robert Smith, Federal Coordinator; Eric Roberts, Contractor Support Staff Portsmouth...

359

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Staff Paducah Citizens' Advisory Board: Ben Peterson, Chair, Judy Clayton, Member; Robert Smith, Federal Coordinator; Eric Roberts, Contractor Support Staff Portsmouth...

360

Surface Transportation Board BNSF/DOE/DOD Rate-Service Agreement...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Surface Transportation Board BNSFDOEDOD Rate-Service Agreement Surface Transportation Board BNSFDOEDOD Rate-Service Agreement Surface Transportation Board BNSFDOEDOD...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Environmental Management Advisory Board Members | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Communication & Engagement » EMAB » Environmental Communication & Engagement » EMAB » Environmental Management Advisory Board Members Environmental Management Advisory Board Members EMAB membership reflects a diversity of views, demographics, expertise, and professional and academic experience. The following members comprise the current Board: Current Members James A. Ajello EMAB Board Chair Read Bio ‣ Dennis P. Ferrigno EMAB Board Vice-Chair Read Bio ‣ Franklin E. Coffman EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Paul M. Dabbar EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ G. Brian Estes EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Jane A. Hedges EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Carolyn L. Huntoon EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Kimberlee Kearfott EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ John A. Owsley EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Willie Preacher EMAB Board Member

362

Manual of Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy 6.4 Performance Plan and Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Manual of Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy 6.4 ­ Performance Plan and Review Policy Category: Personnel Subject: Performance Plans and Review Approving Authority: Board of Governors Procedures: Administrative Procedures for Performance Plan and Review Related University Policies: Effective

Lennard, William N.

363

Processing A Printed Wiring Board By Single Bath Electrodeposition  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A method of processing a printed wiring board by single bath electrodeposition. Initial processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board. Copper is plated on the printed wiring board from a bath containing nickel and copper. Nickel is plated on the printed wiring board from the bath containing nickel and copper and final processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board.

Meltzer, Michael P. (Oakland, CA); Steffani, Christopher P. (Livermore, CA); Gonfiotti, Ray A. (Livermore, CA)

2003-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

364

Processing a printed wiring board by single bath electrodeposition  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A method of processing a printed wiring board. Initial processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board. Copper is plated on the printed wiring board from a bath containing nickel and copper. Nickel is plated on the printed wiring board from a bath containing nickel and copper and final processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board.

Meltzer, Michael P. (Oakland, CA); Steffani, Christopher P. (Livermore, CA); Gonfiotti, Ray A. (Livermore, CA)

2010-12-07T23:59:59.000Z

365

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's (BOARD) RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Brief submitted pursuant to the June 30 and July 14, 2010 Orders of the Commission's Secretary. DOE requests that the Commission review and reverse the Board's Order for the reasons stated in DOE's initial and reply briefs. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW

366

Standard Review Plan Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Milestones Review & Approval Standard Review Plan (SRP) E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a n a g e m e n t DOE - EM - SRP - 2010 2nd Edition Overview March 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 1 Standard Review Plan Overview Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision Milestones Review and Approval The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission-critical projects/facilities. Coupled with this ongoing mission is the added responsibility for EM to diligently leverage and apply American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds to accelerate the completion of its

367

Renewable Energy Technical Potential | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technical Potential Technical Potential Dataset Summary Description No description given. Source National Renewable Energy Laboratory Date Released July 03rd, 2012 (2 years ago) Date Updated July 03rd, 2012 (2 years ago) Keywords biopower csp geothermal hydropower hydrothermal Renewable Energy Technical Potential rooftop United States utility-scale wind Data text/csv icon United States Renewable Energy Technical Potential (csv, 7.7 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset Usefulness of the metadata Average vote Your vote Usefulness of the dataset Average vote Your vote Ease of access Average vote Your vote Overall rating

368

A technical review of non-destructive assay research for the characterization of spent nuclear fuel assemblies being conducted under the US DOE NGSI  

SciTech Connect

There is a growing belief that expansion of nuclear energy generation will be needed in the coming decades as part of a mixed supply chain to meet global energy demand. At stake is the health of the economic engine that delivers human prosperity. As a consequence renewed interest is being paid to the safe management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and the plutonium it contains. In addition to being an economically valuable resource because it can be used to construct explosive devices, Pu must be placed on an inventory and handled securely. A multiinstitutional team of diverse specialists has been assembled under a project funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI) to address ways to nondestructively quantify the plutonium content of spent nuclear fuel assemblies, and to also detect the potential diversion of pins from those assemblies. Studies are underway using mostly Monte Carlo tools to assess the feasibility, individual and collective performance capability of some fourteen nondestructive assay methods. Some of the methods are familiar but are being applied in a new way against a challenging target which is being represented with a higher degree of realism in simulation space than has been done before, while other methods are novel. In this work we provide a brief review of the techniques being studied and highlight the main achievements to date. We also draw attention to the deficiencies identified in for example modeling capability and available basic nuclear data. We conclude that this is an exciting time to be working in the NDA field and that much work, both fundamental and applied, remains ahead if we are to advance the state of the practice to meet the challenges posed to domestic and international safeguards by the expansion of nuclear energy together with the emergence of alternative fuel cycles.

Croft, Stephen [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Tobin, Stephen J [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

369

Report of the Independent Scientific Advisory Board Regarding a Research Proposal for Inclusion in the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Recovery Project Independent Scientific Advisory Board Northwest Power Planning Council National MarineISAB 97-4 Report of the Independent Scientific Advisory Board Regarding a Research Proposal for Inclusion in the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Proposal Reviewed: Lake Pend Oreille Fishery

370

September 8, 1995, Board announcement of a Public Meeting on tthe status of public health and safety issues pertaining to K-East Basin activities at the Hanford Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Notice is hereby given of an open meeting of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Notice is hereby given of an open meeting of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) with representatives of the Department of Energy O E ) regarding the Department's standards-based safety management program. The purpose of the meeting is twofold: (1) for DOE to provide information to the Board regarding the status of DOE'S review and revision of nuclear safety Orders and rules, and (2) to allow the Deputy Secretary of Energy to obtain the preliminary advice of individual Board members in i d e n m g any significant safety issues raised by the Board's review of draft revisions to date. No Board decision will be reached, nor will agency business be finally disposed of during the session. This meeting is noticed pursuant to the provisions of the

371

Technical Consultant Contract  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Technical Consultant Contract, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

372

DOE Approved Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE.

373

Technical Consultant Report Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Technical Consultant Report Template, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

374

file://L:\\DOE-hanford.gov\\public\\boards\\hab\\advice\\advice22.htm  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

submits the report, "Technical Team Review of Proposed New Double- Shell Tanks at Hanford" to the Tri-Parties. This report was prepared by Glenn Paulson, Ph.D.; Frank Parker,...

375

On-Board Fuel Processing Committee Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ON-BOARD FUEL PROCESSING ON-BOARD FUEL PROCESSING GO/NO-GO DECISION DOE DECISION TEAM COMMITTEE REPORT August 2004 (Revised) Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary............................................................................................. 1 2. Introduction.......................................................................................................... 2 3. Background.......................................................................................................... 2 4. Process................................................................................................................. 2 5. Recommendation............................................................................................... 3 6. Rationale ........................................................................................................ 4

376

BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS CITY OF OAKLAND  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS CITY OF OAKLAND RESOLUTION NO. 13-141 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCE PROCUREMENT PLAN. I WHEREAS, the Board of Port (the "Agenda Report") and related agenda materials, has received the expert testimony of Port

377

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS Bylaws ARTICLE I Membership 1. The Board shall consist of the members appointed each year shall be an alumnus of George Mason University. Appointments shall from office for malfeasance, misfeasance, incompetence, or gross neglect of duty, and fill the vacancy

378

of the Board of Regents CHARTER PROVISIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of the Board 5.04 Secretary 5.05 Chief Financial Officer 5.06 General Counsel 5.07 Inspector General 5.08 Chief and shall be interpreted accordingly. 1.02 AMENDMENT These bylaws may be amended at any meeting of the Board

Mathis, Wayne N.

379

RULES AND REGULATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on best management practices to protect and restore that important resource, and to meet PennsylvaniaRULES AND REGULATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD [25 PA. CODE CHS. 91 AND 92] Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations and Other Agricultural Operations [35 Pa.B. 5796] The Environmental Quality Board

Guiltinan, Mark

380

Code Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office Department of Energy Washington, DC APRIL 2013 1 Welcome Welcome to The Building Technologies Office's Code Compliance Technical Meeting and to Washington, DC. On behalf of the Department of Energy Building Technology Office (BTO), we would like to thank you for attending, for your participation. The goal of this meeting is to review and discuss ongoing projects and existing activities that improve compliance with model energy codes. DOE

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Alternative Fuels Data Center: NextGen Energy Board  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

NextGen Energy Board NextGen Energy Board to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: NextGen Energy Board on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: NextGen Energy Board on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: NextGen Energy Board on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: NextGen Energy Board on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: NextGen Energy Board on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: NextGen Energy Board on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type NextGen Energy Board The NextGen Energy Board (Board) was created to conduct research on how Minnesota can better invest its resources to achieve energy independence and agricultural and resource sustainability. The Board must:

382

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Sandia Site Office- 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This self assessment examined how Sandia Site Office (SSO) executes the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan.

383

MINUTES MAPS Board Meeting April 9, 2013, MAPS Office 4-6:30pm  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MINUTES MAPS Board Meeting April 9, 2013, MAPS Office 4-6:30pm 1 Present: J. An J. Arlen, A $133.31 to be paid to Student Financial Aid & Financial Scholarships (McMaster) b. Review of MAPS financial opportunities for students K. Pastrak was brought in to discuss the 3 MAPS awards and bursaries

Hitchcock, Adam P.

384

LEARNING & TEACHING PLAN 2012-2014 Approved by Academic Board 30 March 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

). REPORTING AND REVIEW Reports of progress against this Learning and Teaching Plan will be prepared by the ProLEARNING & TEACHING PLAN 2012-2014 Approved by Academic Board 30 March 2012 INTRODUCTION Charles' diverse learning needs, and engaging in professional approaches to teaching at the highest standard

385

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes, and National Marine Fisheries Service 851 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 Review of draft Viability Criteria for Application to Interior Columbia Basin Salmonid ESUs

386

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Advisory Board for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes, and National Marine Fisheries Service 851 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 1100 Portland, 2006, NOAA Fisheries requested that the ISAB review a number of hypotheses about the causative factors

387

Operational Readiness Review: Savannah River Replacement Tritium Facility  

SciTech Connect

The Operational Readiness Review (ORR) is one of several activities to be completed prior to introducing tritium into the Replacement Tritium Facility (RTF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The Secretary of Energy will rely in part on the results of this ORR in deciding whether the startup criteria for RTF have been met. The RTF is a new underground facility built to safely service the remaining nuclear weapons stockpile. At RTF, tritium will be unloaded from old components, purified and enriched, and loaded into new or reclaimed reservoirs. The RTF will replace an aging facility at SRS that has processed tritium for more than 35 years. RTF has completed construction and is undergoing facility startup testing. The final stages of this testing will require the introduction of limited amounts of tritium. The US Department of Energy (DOE) ORR was conducted January 19 to February 4, 1993, in accordance with an ORR review plan which was developed considering previous readiness reviews. The plan also considered the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendations 90-4 and 92-6, and the judgements of experienced senior experts. The review covered three major areas: (1) Plant and Equipment Readiness, (2) Personnel Readiness, and (3) Management Systems. The ORR Team was comprised of approximately 30 members consisting of a Team Leader, Senior Safety Experts, and Technical Experts. The ORR objectives and criteria were based on DOE Orders, industry standards, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations guidelines, recommendations of external oversight groups, and experience of the team members.

Not Available

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Department of Energy to Host Secretary of Energy Advisory Board...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Department of Energy to Host Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Natural Gas Subcommittee Meeting Department of Energy to Host Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Natural Gas...

389

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Committees | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Committees Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Committees Oak Ridge's Site Specific Advisory Board uses its committee structure to achieve its mission and conduct many of its...

390

QA Corporate Board Meeting - February 2014 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

February 2014 QA Corporate Board Meeting - February 2014 14th EM Quality Assurance Corporate Board Meeting Meeting Location: Teleconference Room: NA Documents Available for...

391

Corporate Board By-Laws | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

the by-laws of the EM QA Corporate Board. By-Laws Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board More Documents & Publications ORSSAB Bylaws High Level...

392

Los Alamos National Laboratory board renews plan for education...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

renews giving plan Los Alamos National Laboratory board renews plan for education, economic development, charitable giving The Los Alamos National Security, LLC Board of...

393

http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/091.htm  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 May 3, 1999 Dear Ms. Reeves: RE: Hanford Advisory Board Consensus Advice...

394

http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/090.htm  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Tom Fitzsimmons Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 January 5, 1999 Dear Ms. Reeves: RE: Hanford Advisory Board...

395

London Waste and Recycling Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

London Waste and Recycling Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: London Waste and Recycling Board Place: London, England, United Kingdom Zip: SE1 0AL Sector: Services Product:...

396

Feasibility of OnBoard Thermoelectric Generation for Improved...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

OnBoard Thermoelectric Generation for Improved Vehicle Fuel Economy Feasibility of OnBoard Thermoelectric Generation for Improved Vehicle Fuel Economy Poster presentation at the...

397

Hanford Advisory Board Page 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

has slowed in order for DOE-ORP to review and address technology challenges. Scott Samuelson, DOE-RL, recognized Susan Leckband for her excellent work as HAB Chair. Scott...

398

Hanford Advisory Board Page 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary September 4-5, 2014 short and long term. A draft report from an independent review team, to be released in December, will help DOE understand how to move forward to...

399

FAR Card: Technical specifiers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

specifiers specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers You've been told: "I can't get you that product." Technical specifiers Technical specifiers You've been told: You've been told: "I can't get you that product." "I can't get you that product."

400

Secretary Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Community  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cincinnati State Technical and Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement Secretary Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement June 18, 2009 - 12:00am Addthis Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement Address Secretary Steven Chu Thursday, June 18, 2009 President Henderson, members of the Board of Trustees, faculty, family, friends, and, especially the new graduates, I am very pleased to be your commencement speaker. To the graduates, I offer my sincere congratulations. I know how hard you've worked to reach this day, and for this reason, I am especially delighted to be here. Many of you are the first in your families to have gone beyond high school. Some may have dropped out of school, and this event celebrates

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Secretary Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Community  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement Secretary Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement June 18, 2009 - 12:00am Addthis Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement Address Secretary Steven Chu Thursday, June 18, 2009 President Henderson, members of the Board of Trustees, faculty, family, friends, and, especially the new graduates, I am very pleased to be your commencement speaker. To the graduates, I offer my sincere congratulations. I know how hard you've worked to reach this day, and for this reason, I am especially delighted to be here. Many of you are the first in your families to have gone beyond high school. Some may have dropped out of school, and this event celebrates

402

Environmental Management Advisory Board Subcommittees | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EMAB » Environmental EMAB » Environmental Management Advisory Board Subcommittees Environmental Management Advisory Board Subcommittees ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE PURPOSE: The Subcommittee will provide advice, information, and recommendations to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (EM) relating to project management. Although, EM has a solid performance record for cleanup projects, EM must improve its ability to deliver all projects within cost and on schedule, thereby reducing EM's operations and maintenance costs. The Subcommittee produces reports and recommendations to the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) as necessary. Mr. David W. Swindle, Jr. (Co-Chair) Federal Services/URS Corporation Mr. G. Brian Estes (Co-Chair)

403

2009 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

O. Box 5400 O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 The Honorable A.I. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: MAR 1 9 2009 Enclosed is the Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1. This plan has been updated to identify that all Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE's mission have been completed. This revised

404

2007 Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7,2007 7,2007 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004-290 1 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, Revision 2, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1. This plan has been updated to identify the completed and remaining Department corrective actions to improve recruiting, developing, training, qualifying, maintaining proficiency of, and retaining technical personnel to safely accomplish DOE'S mission. The plan is approved and issued for implementation, effective

405

Senior Technical Safety Manager  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Program Technical Program Manager Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1178-2004 May 2013 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program. Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to the Office of Leadership and Career Manager, Technical Qualification Program (TQP), Albuquerque Complex. This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... ii

406

INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE FOCUSED FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN FOR DESIGNATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS CONTRIBUTING TO THE SOUTHWEST GROUNDWATER PLUME AT THE PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT  

SciTech Connect

The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently developing a Proposed Plan (PP) for remediation of designated sources of chlorinated solvents that contribute contamination to the Southwest (SW) Groundwater Plume at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), in Paducah, KY. The principal contaminants in the SW Plume are trichloroethene (TCE) and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs); these industrial solvents were used and disposed in various facilities and locations at PGDP. In the SW plume area, residual TCE sources are primarily in the fine-grained sediments of the Upper Continental Recharge System (UCRS), a partially saturated zone that delivers contaminants downward into the coarse-grained Regional Gravel Aquifer (RGA). The RGA serves as the significant lateral groundwater transport pathway for the plume. In the SW Plume area, the four main contributing TCE source units are: (1) Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 1 / Oil Landfarm; (2) C-720 Building TCE Northeast Spill Site (SWMU 211A); (3) C-720 Building TCE Southeast Spill Site (SWMU 211B); and (4) C-747 Contaminated Burial Yard (SWMU 4). The PP presents the Preferred Alternatives for remediation of VOCs in the UCRS at the Oil Landfarm and the C-720 Building spill sites. The basis for the PP is documented in a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) (DOE, 2011) and a Site Investigation Report (SI) (DOE, 2007). The SW plume is currently within the boundaries of PGDP (i.e., does not extend off-site). Nonetheless, reasonable mitigation of the multiple contaminant sources contributing to the SW plume is one of the necessary components identified in the PGDP End State Vision (DOE, 2005). Because of the importance of the proposed actions DOE assembled an Independent Technical Review (ITR) team to provide input and assistance in finalizing the PP.

Looney, B.; Eddy-Dilek, C.; Amidon, M.; Rossabi, J.; Stewart, L.

2011-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

407

Performance Assessment Community of Practice Technical Exchange  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Department of Energy is hosting a Technical Exchange at the Hanford Site on The Department of Energy is hosting a Technical Exchange at the Hanford Site on April 13-14, 2010. The Performance Assessment Community of Practice has been chartered to advise the Office of Environmental Management Tank Waste Corporate Board regarding performance assessments and performance assessment-like analyses, promote consistency in the preparation of performance assessments across the Department of Energy (DOE) complex, foster exchange of information among performance assessment practitioners, and develop appropriate guidance for performance assessments such that they are based on sound science and are defensible. The purpose of this technical exchange is to provide a venue for performance assessment and risk assessment practitioners, managers and regulators, and contributors to the Cementitious Barriers Partnership and Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management project to share plans and experiences and share ideas for future performance assessment and risk assessment modeling. The technical exchange will include a combination of plenary presentations and discussions with breakout sessions for specific topics. Discussions will emphasize areas for improved consistency and solicit suggestions for future developments related to modeling tools. A breakout discussion session is also planned to address: DOE Order 435.1 Update, regulatory challenges for performance and risk assessment modeling, and other topical areas. Arrangements have also been made for a GoldSim modeling roundtable at the conclusion of the workshop for participants who are interested in sharing experiences related to the use of GoldSim for their simulations.

408

Technical Information Officers | Scientific and Technical Information  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Technical Information Officers Technical Information Officers Print page Print page Email page Email page Technical Information Officers (TIO) serve as the principal DOE or NNSA office point of contact and assistant to, and liaison with, the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) that serves as the Department's office charged with the Scientific and Technical Information Program (STIP). The TIOs are to be familiar with the STI Programs within their Office they represent (given they have contracting financial assistance and/or acquisition activities) and for their major site/facility management contractor(s) STI Program to discern compliance with the DOE O 241.1B. They must maintain an up-to-date knowledge-base of the STI Program activities and provide timely feedback on issues as they emerge. While

409

Knoxville Utilities Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Knoxville Utilities Board Knoxville Utilities Board (Redirected from KUB) Jump to: navigation, search Name Knoxville Utilities Board Place Knoxville, Tennessee Utility Id 10421 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] SGIC[2] Energy Information Administration Form 826[3] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Knoxville Utilities Board Smart Grid Project was awarded $3,585,022 Recovery Act Funding with a total project value of $9,356,989. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png FIVE-MINUTE RESPONSE (5 MR) INTERRUPTIBLE POWER Commercial GSA (1) 0KW-50KW Commercial OUTDOOR LIGHTING Part B- Mercury Vapor 1000W Lighting

410

The Board's Role for Credit Union Mergers  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Boards Role in Credit Union Mergers William A. Brown, PhD Associate Professor, Bush School of Government & Public Service, Texas A&M University ISBN 978-1-932795-22-6 Th e B o a rd s R o le in C red it U n io n M erg ers PO Box 2998 Madison..., WI 53701-2998 Phone (608) 231-8550 www.fi lene.org ideas grow here PUBLICATION #141 (10/07) ISBN 978-1-932795-22-6 The Boards Role in Credit Union Mergers William A. Brown, PhD Associate Professor, Bush School of Government & Public Service, Texas A...

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Advisory Board Seats New Student Representatives | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

15, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB) welcomed two new student representatives at its May meeting. Gracie Hall and Julia Riley will serve...

412

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 6:00 p.m. DOE Information Center 1 Science.gov Way, Oak Ridge, Tenn. AGENDA I. Welcome and Announcements (D....

413

BOARD OF TRUSTEES NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

boundary and adjacent to Gardner Street to Progress Energy in connection with the development and Ethics Statement Barbara Mulkey, Chair of the Board Roll Call Approval of Minutes TAB 1 -- January 24

Buckel, Jeffrey A.

414

Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The 94th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting will be held January 1115, 2015, in Washington, D.C. at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center. The event covers the entire transportation...

415

Plasma etchback of multilayer printed wiring boards  

SciTech Connect

Removal of epoxy smear and glass fiber protrusions in multilayer printed wiring board holes was investigated. Gas plasma techniques, using a mixture of carbon tetrafluoride and oxygen, removed the eposies; however, the glass fibers were not affected.

Gentry, F.L.

1980-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

PIER Advisory Board November 10, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and communicate benefits to stakeholders. 4:00 pm Royalties -- PIER Staff; Advisory Board What is the role of royalty payments in R&D Projects? Should PIER increase its focus on royalty repayments? If so, how would

417

Energy Systems Acquisitions Advisory Board Procedures  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Notice streamlines the Energy Systems Acquisition Advisory Board (ESAAB) process to ensure informed, objective, and documented Strategic and Major System Critical Decision, Baseline Change Proposal, and site selection final decisions. Does not cancel other directives.

1997-10-28T23:59:59.000Z

418

On-Boarding Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

On-Boarding Program On-Boarding Program On-Boarding Program On-Boarding Program Onboarding, also known as organizational socialization, refers to the mechanism through which new employees acquire the necessary knowledge, skills, and behaviors to become effective organizational members and insiders.[1] Tactics used in this process include formal meetings, lectures, videos, printed materials, or computer-based orientations to introduce newcomers to their new jobs and organizations. Research has demonstrated that these socialization techniques lead to positive outcomes for new employees such as higher job satisfaction, better job performance, greater organizational commitment, and reduction in stress and intent to quit.[2][3] These outcomes are particularly important to an organization

419

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS FOR BOARD APPROVAL  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS FOR BOARD APPROVAL FACULTY HANDBOOK Subject Description Relevant Handbook Sections Material Changes Change of Locus. Vacation benefit does not roll from year to year becoming a "use it or lose

420

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Provides requirements and responsibilities to ensure recruitment and hiring of technically capable personnel to retain critical technical capabilities within the Department at all times. Cancels DOE M 426.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 426.1.

2004-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOD MEDICAL EXAMINATION REVIEW BOARD (DODMERB) REPORT OF MEDICAL HISTORY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Merchant Marine Academy for applications to their Academies. DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure NO Chemical Inhalants Hallucinogens Marijuana 9. Wear contact lenses or corneal eye retainers (If Yes? 8. Wear glasses 9a. If you wear contact lenses, how many days have they been removed prior

de Lijser, Peter

422

DOD MEDICAL EXAMINATION REVIEW BOARD (DODMERB) REPORT OF MEDICAL HISTORY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

be disclosed to the Coast Guard Academy and Merchant Marine Academy for applications to their Academies Code) 6. DATE OF EXAMINATION (YYYYMMDD) DO YOUYES NO Chemical Inhalants Hallucinogens Marijuana 9. Wear BY METHODS OTHER THAN STATED IN QUESTIONS 8 OR 9? 8. Wear glasses 9a. If you wear contact lenses, how many

Maxwell, Bruce D.

423

Independent Scientific Advisory Board Review of Salmon and Steelhead  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Hoc Member Richard N. Williams -ISRP #12;Acknowledgements The ISAB thanks all of the scientists Hallerman, Pete Hassemer, Jay Hesse, Ray Hilborn, Mike Kern, Paul Kline, Jim Lannan, Si Levin, Jeff Lutch

424

NSUARB -NSPI -P-887 NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, notably coal, petcoke, oil, and natural gas, to meet about 85 percent of its energy demand for electrical

Hughes, Larry

425

Office of Research Committees Institutional Review Board 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mariano Fernandez Medicine Radiology/Nuclear Medicine Ralph Giannella Medicine Digestive Diseases Philip Riegle and Kathleen Chard) Research Compliance and Regulatory Affairs Pediatric Nursing, Epidemiologist

Papautsky, Ian

426

SFEI Page 1 RMP Technical Review Committee  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(Attachment: Draft SC Minutes) 10:15 Meg Sedlak 3. Action: Special Study Proposals for 2012 The following) 4. Small Tributary Regional Loading (McKee) 5. Small Tributary Load Monitoring (McKee) 6. Small Follow up ­ Year 2 (Sedlak) Desired Outcome: Committee recommendation on package of special studies

427

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Versions are available for download August 1, 2007 Building C-400 Thermal Treatment 90% Remedial Design Report and Site Investigation Full Document and Summary Versions are...

428

Experimental test of airplane boarding methods  

We report the results of an experimental comparison of different airplane boarding methods. This test was conducted in a mock 757 fuselage, located on a Southern California soundstage, with 12 rows of six seats and a single aisle. Five methods were tested using 72 passengers of various ages. We found a significant reduction in the boarding times of optimized methods over traditional methods. These improved methods, if properly implemented, could result in a significant savings to airline companies. The process of boarding an airplane is of interest to a variety of groups. The public is interested both as a curiosity, as it is something that they may regularly experience, and as a consumer, as their experiences good or bad can affect their loyalties. Airline companies and their employees also have a stake in an efficient boarding procedure as time saved in the boarding process may result is monetary savings, in the quality of interactions with passengers, and in the application of human resources to the general process of preparing an airplane for departure. A recent study (Nyquist and McFadden, 2008) indicates that the average cost to an airline company for each minute of time spent at the terminal is roughly $30. Thus, each minute saved in the turn-around time of a flight has the potential to generate over $16,000,000 in annual savings (assuming an average of 1500 flights per day). While the boarding process may not be the primary source of delay in returning an airplane to the skies, reducing the boarding time may effectively eliminate passenger boarding as a contributor in any meaningful measure. Consequently, subsequent efforts to streamline the other necessary tasks, such as refueling and maintenance, would be rewarded with a material reduction in time at the gate for each flight.

Steffen, Jason H. [Fermilab; Hotchkiss, Jon [Hotchkiss Industries, Sherman Oaks

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

Open Business Board Meeting on 20 November 2007 held at  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on 23rd October 2007 were signed as a true record. Matters for report 1333 Membership of the Board The Board were sorry to hear that Professor Jacobus had decide to resign from the Board, but were pleased to a query from Legal Services, the Board were disturbed to learn that the University does not have

Zernicka-Goetz, Magdalena

430

Rediness Review Team Member Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEMBER MEMBER TRAINING Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Michael Hillman DOE HQ - HSS Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Dan M. Stover, PE Technical And Professional Services, Inc. 47 James Habersham Blvd Beaufort, SC 29906 Official DOE Team Member Readiness Review Training November 8-9, 2010 Module 1 Module 1 READINESS REVIEW TEAM MEMBER TRAINING Introduction & Course Conduct Readiness Review Readiness Review Official DOE Team Member Readiness Review Training November 2010 TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TEAM MEMBER TRAINING Purpose of this Course Provide Prospective Readiness Review Team members h with: * An understanding of the background behind the Readiness Review Process; e e ocess; * Training in the mechanics of performance and reporting of

431

Nutrient Management Advisory Board ~ Approved ~  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

shared some of the proposed changes to the Odor Site Index, Standard Plan, and BMP reference list as individuals representing commercial Ag were in attendance. 2.) Review and Action of July 28, 2011 NMAB Meeting community how to use the MMM, and how to write Manure Management Plans (MMPs). DEP has made mini

Guiltinan, Mark

432

Technical Standards Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Technical Standards Program (TSP) promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards by the Department of Energy (DOE), provides DOE with the means to develop needed technical standards, and manages overall technical standards information, activities, issues, and interactions. Cancels DOE O 1300.2A. Canceled by DOE O 252.1A

1999-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

433

Federal Technical Capability  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This directive defines requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Cancels DOE M 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

434

Technical Standards Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. Admin Chg 1 dated 3-12-13.

2011-02-23T23:59:59.000Z

435

DOE Technical Assistance Program  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

5.800 Yes 6232010 City of Tucson, Arizona AZ 5.590 -- 6242010 Board of Trustees for Western State College of Colorado CO 1.635 -- 6282010 City of Fort Collins, Electric...

436

Technical Cost Modeling - Life Cycle Analysis Basis for Program...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

1 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation lm001das2011o.pdf More Documents & Publications Technical Cost...

437

SMART WATER GRID PLAN B TECHNICAL REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SMART WATER GRID PLAN B TECHNICAL REPORT FALL 2014 PREPARED BY: OLGA MARTYUSHEVA IN PARTIAL demand linked to the global population increase. A Smart Water Grid (SWG) is a two-way real time network, and others. A review of the benefits of Smart Water Grids is presented in the context of water conservation

Julien, Pierre Y.

438

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. Preliminary Review Copy FHWA/TX-03/1833-01-imp-1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date October 2002 4. Title Harrison Michael Bomba 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1833-01-imp-1 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)9

Texas at Austin, University of

439

Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee serves as an advisory body to the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) by providing support to their policy efforts aimed at ensuring the safe performance of hoisting and rigging activities at DOE facilities and in the review and resolution of identified generic hoisting and rigging safety issues.

440

Annual report to Congress: Department of Energy activities relating to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Calendar Year 1999  

SciTech Connect

This is the tenth Annual Report to the Congress describing Department of Energy activities in response to formal recommendations and other interactions with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board). The Board, an independent executive-branch agency established in 1988, provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy regarding public health and safety issues at the Department's defense nuclear facilities. The Board also reviews and evaluates the content and implementation of health and safety standards, as well as other requirements, relating to the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Department's defense nuclear facilities. During 1999, Departmental activities resulted in the closure of nine Board recommendations. In addition, the Department has completed all implementation plan milestones associated with three Board recommendations. One new Board recommendation was received and accepted by the Department in 1999, and a new implementation plan is being developed to address this recommendation. The Department has also made significant progress with a number of broad-based initiatives to improve safety. These include expanded implementation of integrated safety management at field sites, opening of a repository for long-term storage of transuranic wastes, and continued progress on stabilizing excess nuclear materials to achieve significant risk reduction.

None

2000-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

The EM SSAB Annual Work Plan Process: Focusing Board Efforts and Resources - 13667  

SciTech Connect

One of the most daunting tasks for any new member of a local board of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) is to try to understand the scope of the clean-up activities going on at the site. In most cases, there are at least two or three major cleanup activities in progress as well as monitoring of past projects. When planning for future projects is added to the mix, the list of projects can be long. With the clean-up activities involving all major environmental media - air, water, soils, and groundwater, new EM SSAB members can find themselves totally overwhelmed and ineffective. Helping new members get over this initial hurdle is a major objective of EM and all local boards of the EM SSAB. Even as members start to understand the size and scope of the projects at a site, they can still be frustrated at the length of time it takes to see results and get projects completed. Many project and clean-up timelines for most of the sites go beyond 10 years, so it's not unusual for an EM SSAB member to see the completion of only 1 or 2 projects over the course of their 6-year term on the board. This paper explores the annual work planning process of the EM SSAB local boards, one tool that can be used to educate EM SSAB members into seeing the broader picture for the site. EM SSAB local work plans divide the site into projects focused on a specific environmental issue or media such as groundwater and/or waste disposal options. Projects are further broken down into smaller segments by highlighting major milestones. Using these metrics, local boards of the EM SSAB can start to quantify the effectiveness of the project in achieving the ultimate goal of site clean-up. These metrics can also trigger board advice and recommendations for EM. At the beginning of each fiscal year, the EM SSAB work plan provides a road map with quantifiable checkpoints for activities throughout the year. When the work plans are integrated with site-specific, enforceable regulatory milestones, they can provide a comprehensive work plan for not only the board, but also regulators, site contractors, and DOE. Because the work plans are reviewed and approved by DOE, they carry some weight in holding local boards of the EM SSAB accountable. This structure provides the basis for local boards to achieve their primary function, to provide DOE with information, advice, and recommendations concerning issues affecting the EM program at the site. (authors)

Young, Ralph [Paducah Citizens Advisory Board (United States)] [Paducah Citizens Advisory Board (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Underground Exploration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Underground Exploration and Testing A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board October 1993 Yucca Mountain at #12;Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Dr. John E and Testing #12;Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Introduction

443

MELCOR Peer Review  

SciTech Connect

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

Boyack, B.E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Dhir, V.K. [Santa Monica, CA. (United States); Gieseke, J.A. [Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); Haste, T.J. [AEA Technology, Winfrith (United Kingdom); Kenton, M.A. [Gabor, Kenton and Associates, Inc., Westmont, IL (United States); Khatib-Rahbar, M. [Energy Research, Inc., Rockville, MD (United States); Leonard, M.T. [Science Applications International Corp., Wolfheze (Netherlands); Viskanta, R. [Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN (United States). Heat Transfer Lab.

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

Gravitational waves: a foundational review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The standard linear approach to the gravitational waves theory is critically reviewed. Contrary to the prevalent understanding, it is pointed out that this theory contains many conceptual and technical obscure issues that require further analysis.

J. G. Pereira

2013-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

445

Final Technical Report  

SciTech Connect

This project developed a new high-performance R-10/high SHGC window design, reviewed market positioning and evaluated manufacturing solutions required for broad market adoption. The project objectives were accomplished by: identifying viable technical solutions based on modeling of modern and potential coating stacks and IGU designs; development of new coating material sets for HM thin film stacks, as well as improved HM IGU designs to accept multiple layers of HM films; matching promising new coating designs with new HM IGU designs to demonstrate performance gains; and, in cooperation with a window manufacturer, assess the potential for high-volume manufacturing and cost efficiency of a HM-based R-10 window with improved solar heat gain characteristics. A broad view of available materials and design options was applied to achieve the desired improvements. Gated engineering methodologies were employed to guide the development process from concept generation to a window demonstration. The project determined that a slightly de-rated window performance allows formulation of a path to achieve the desired cost reductions to support end consumer adoption.

Stoessel, Chris

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

446

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

approximately $3.5 million in annual funding. The Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board (UCSRB) is the project for selecting and funding projects ­ the same as presently used for Salmon Recovery Funding Board and Mid1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th

447

March 10, 2005, Board letter forwarding Recommendation 2005-1, Nuclear Material Packaging  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FACLLTIlEs FACLLTIlEs SAFETYBOARD John T. Conway, Chairman A.J. Eggenberger, Vice Chairman Joseph F. Bader John E. Mansfield R. Bruce Matthews 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Wa5hington. D.C. 20004-2901 (202) 694-7000 March 10, 2005 The Honorable Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-1000 Dear Secretary Bodman: On March 10,2005, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board), in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 9 2286a(a)(5), unanimously approved Recommendation 2005- 1, Nuclear Material Packaging, which is enclosed for your consideration. This recommendation addresses issuance of a requirement that nuclear material packaging meet technically justified criteria for safe storage and handling outside of engineered contamination barriers.

448

NREL: Technology Deployment - City and Community Technical Assistance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

City and Community Technical Assistance City and Community Technical Assistance NREL technical experts provide technical assistance to cities and communities to help identify and implement a variety of energy efficiency and renewable energy technology solutions. This includes: Greensburg, Kansas An International Inspiration for Green Disaster Recovery New Orleans, Louisiana Energy-Efficient Design Lessons Learned for K-12 Schools Project assistance Program, portfolio, and sustainable community design Request for proposals and performance contracting reviews State, local, federal, and financial policy analysis Strategic planning Trainings and workshops. Disaster Resiliency and Recovery NREL's comprehensive disaster resiliency and recovery program addresses the energy-related considerations of disaster prevention and planning, response

449

EM Highlights Advisory Board Contributions | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Highlights Advisory Board Contributions Highlights Advisory Board Contributions EM Highlights Advisory Board Contributions March 5, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Participants in the session on Advisory Board contributions to the EM program included, left to right, Karen Guevara, Savannah River Site; Ralph Phelps, Northern New Mexico Citizens’ Advisory Board; Cate Alexander, EM; Eric Roberts, EHI Consultants; Dave Adler, Oak Ridge site; and Ralph Young, Paducah Citizens Advisory Board. Participants in the session on Advisory Board contributions to the EM program included, left to right, Karen Guevara, Savannah River Site; Ralph Phelps, Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board; Cate Alexander, EM; Eric Roberts, EHI Consultants; Dave Adler, Oak Ridge site; and Ralph Young, Paducah Citizens Advisory Board.

450

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Knoxville Utilities Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use on AddThis.com... Jan. 22, 2011 Knoxville Utilities Board Reduces Petroleum Use F ind out how the Knoxville Utilities Board is displacing more than 46,000

451

EM Highlights Advisory Board Contributions | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM Highlights Advisory Board Contributions EM Highlights Advisory Board Contributions EM Highlights Advisory Board Contributions March 5, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Participants in the session on Advisory Board contributions to the EM program included, left to right, Karen Guevara, Savannah River Site; Ralph Phelps, Northern New Mexico Citizens’ Advisory Board; Cate Alexander, EM; Eric Roberts, EHI Consultants; Dave Adler, Oak Ridge site; and Ralph Young, Paducah Citizens Advisory Board. Participants in the session on Advisory Board contributions to the EM program included, left to right, Karen Guevara, Savannah River Site; Ralph Phelps, Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board; Cate Alexander, EM; Eric Roberts, EHI Consultants; Dave Adler, Oak Ridge site; and Ralph Young, Paducah Citizens Advisory Board.

452

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Board and Dealer Requirements  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Propane Board and Propane Board and Dealer Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Board and Dealer Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Board and Dealer Requirements on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Board and Dealer Requirements on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Board and Dealer Requirements on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Board and Dealer Requirements on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Propane Board and Dealer Requirements on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Propane Board and Dealer Requirements The Idaho Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Public Safety Act established the

453

September 24, 2003, Board announcement of a series of Public Meetings regarding the Department of Energy's oversight scheduled for October 21  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

two two meetings described below. The Board will also conduct a series of public hearings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 8 2286b and invites any interested persons or groups to present any comments, technical information, or data concerning safety issues related to the matters to be considered. TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 9:00 a.m., October 21,2003, and 9:00 a.m., October 23, 2003. PLACE: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public Hearing Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004-2001. Additionally, as a part of the Board's E-Government initiative, the meetings will be presented live through Internet video streaming. A link to these presentations will be available on the Board's web site (www.dnfsb.gov). STATUS: Open. While the Government in the Sunshine Act does not require that the

454

Foley Board of Utilities | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Foley Board of Utilities Foley Board of Utilities Jump to: navigation, search Name Foley Board of Utilities Place Alabama Utility Id 6491 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Athletic Field Electric- Option A Commercial Athletic Field Electric- Option B Commercial General Service -Three-Phase Commercial General Service- Single-Phase Commercial Public Highway Lighting- Special Lighting Public Street and Highway Lighting- Customer Owned Fixtures Lighting Public Street and Highway Lighting- Utility-Owned Fixtures- 20,000 Lumen

455

On-Board Storage Systems Analysis  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

On-Board Storage Systems Analysis On-Board Storage Systems Analysis R. K. Ahluwalia, J-K Peng and T. Q. Hua DOE and FreedomCAR & Fuel Partnership Hydrogen Delivery and On-Board Storage Analysis Workshop Washington, DC 25 January 2006 Work sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy: Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies 2 ANL ANL ' ' s Role in H s Role in H 2 2 Storage Systems Development Storage Systems Development Working with DOE contractors and Centers of Excellence researchers: Model and analyze various developmental hydrogen storage systems Analyze hybrid systems that combine features of more than one concept Develop models that can be used to "reverse-engineer" particular technologies Identify interface issues and opportunities, and data

456

Guntersville Electric Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Guntersville Electric Board Guntersville Electric Board Jump to: navigation, search Name Guntersville Electric Board Place Alabama Utility Id 7827 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png GSA 1 Commercial GSA 2 Commercial GSA 3 Commercial Outdoor Lighting Commercial Residential Rate Residential SDE SGSC Industrial SDE SGSD Industrial SDE SMSB Industrial SDE SMSC Industrial SDE SMSD Commercial TDGSA Industrial TDMSA Industrial TOU GSB Industrial TOU GSD Industrial TOU MSB Industrial TOU MSC Industrial

457

Kerrville Public Utility Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kerrville Public Utility Board Kerrville Public Utility Board Jump to: navigation, search Name Kerrville Public Utility Board Place Texas Utility Id 28604 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location TRE NERC ERCOT Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle Yes Alt Fuel Vehicle2 Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Commercial-for Energy greater than 2500 kWh Commercial Commercial-for Energy greater than 2500 kWh-Distributed generation Rider Commercial Commercial-for Energy less or equal to 2500 kWh Commercial Commercial-for Energy less orequal to 2500 kWh-Distributed generation rider

458

Brownsville Public Utilities Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Brownsville Public Utilities Board Brownsville Public Utilities Board Jump to: navigation, search Name Brownsville Public Utilities Board Place Texas Utility Id 2409 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location TRE NERC ERCOT Yes ISO Ercot Yes Operates Generating Plant Yes Activity Generation Yes Activity Transmission Yes Activity Buying Transmission Yes Activity Distribution Yes Activity Wholesale Marketing Yes Activity Bundled Services Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png General Service GSA-1 Commercial General Service- GSA-2 Commercial General Service- GSA-3 Commercial

459

Sylacauga Utilities Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sylacauga Utilities Board Sylacauga Utilities Board Jump to: navigation, search Name Sylacauga Utilities Board Place Alabama Utility Id 18395 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Large General Service Commercial Commercial Large General Service Industrial Industrial Large General Service Primary Service Credit with Standby Generator Capacity Industrial Large General Service Primary Service Credit Commercial Commercial Large General Service Primary Service Credit Industrial Industrial

460

Gerig to Chair Particle Accelerator School Board  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A Record Run for the APS X-ray Source A Record Run for the APS X-ray Source Alp of XSD Elected to FIP Executive Committee George Srajer Appointed APS Upgrade Project Director Toby of XSD to Chair U.S. National Committee for Crystallography Controlling the Inner Electron Dance APS News Archives: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 2000 Subscribe to APS News rss feed Gerig to Chair Particle Accelerator School Board FEBRUARY 23, 2012 Bookmark and Share Rod Gerig (PSC), Deputy Associate Laboratory Director for Photon Sciences Rod Gerig was selected chair of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Particle Accelerator School (USPAS) at the board's annual meeting. Gerig is Deputy Associate Laboratory Director for Photon Sciences at Argonne National Laboratory, and is also the director of the Argonne Accelerator

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Loudon Utilities Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Board Board Jump to: navigation, search Name Loudon Utilities Board Place Tennessee Utility Id 11222 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Outdoor Lighting Lighting Part A: 1,001 - 5,000 kW Industrial Part A: 51 - 1,000 kW Industrial Part A: less than 50kW Commercial Part B: Seasonal D & E Manufacturing: 5,001 - 15,000 kW Industrial Part B: Seasonal D & E Standard: 5,001 - 15,000 kW Industrial Part C: Seasonal D & E Manufacturing: 15,001 - 25,000 kW Industrial

462

December 4, 2003, Board Public Meeting Transcript  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 MR. KLEIN: No, sir. CHAIRMAN CONWAY: Okay. Thank you. Anyone else have anything? We turn to Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Ronald Gallagher. We welcome you here. This is your first meeting, I think, with the Board - - MR. GALLAGHER: That's correct. CHAIRMAN CONWAY: interface with the _ _ Board in any way. We welcome you. MR. GALLAGHER : I appreciate it, Mr . Chairman, members of the Board, I appreciate the opportunity to present. I am President and Chief Executive Officer of Fluor Hanford. I assumed those duties the first week of December of this year, so I ' m relatively new at the job. I did bring along with me my Chief Operating Officer, someone I appointed only this last week into that position, George Jackson. CHAIRMAN CONWAY: Please, you ' re welcome

463

Cullman Power Board | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Board Board Jump to: navigation, search Name Cullman Power Board Place Alabama Utility Id 4617 Utility Location Yes Ownership M NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png Outdoor Lights 100 W HPS Lighting Outdoor Lights 175 W MV Lighting Outdoor Lights 400 W MV Lighting Residential Residential Security Light Service 1000 W MH Lighting Security Light Service 250 W HPS Flood Lighting Security Light Service 250 W MH Lighting Security Light Service 400 W HPS Lighting Security Light Service 400 W HPS Flood Lighting

464

Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004 MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004 Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis - May 3, 2004 May 3, 2004 Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan: MELCOR Gap Analysis This report documents the outcome of an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance (SQA) attributes of the MELCOR computer code for leak path factor applications, relative to established software requirements. This evaluation, a "gap analysis," is performed to meet Commitment 4.2.1.3 of the Department of Energy's Implementation Plan to resolve SQA issues identified in the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2002-1. Technical Standards, MELCOR - Gap Analysis More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, Guidance on MELCOR computer code - May 3, 2004

465

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD (EM SSAB) Savannah River Site Application No. (Please leave blank) ______________ MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION ________________________________________________________________________________________________ The EM SSAB provides meaningful opportunity for collaborative dialogue among the diverse communities at the Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) clean-up sites. At the request of the Assistant Secretary or the Site Manager/Assistant Manager for Environmental Management, the Board provides advice and recommendations concerning the following EM site-specific issues: clean-up standards and environmental restoration; waste management and disposition; stabilization and disposition of non-stockpile nuclear materials;

466

Web Survey Technical Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Glisson,W.B. Welland,R.C. DCS Technical Report Series pp 27 Dept of Computing Science, University of Glasgow

Glisson, W.B.; Welland, R.C.

467

High Level Waste Corporate Board Newsletter - 09/11/08  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UPCOMING UPCOMING EVENTS: The Low-Level Waste Federal Review Group (LFRG) in Washington, DC on 16-18 September 2008. Contact Maureen O'Dell for details (MAUREEN.O'DELL@hq.doe.gov) Next High-Level Waste Corporate Board meeting will be held at DOE- RL on 6 November 2008. Meeting details will be presented here and e- mailed to those persons with an interest to participate. Topics for discussion include but are not limited to:  Results of the Tank Integrity Workshop  Strategic Initiative Briefing  Performance Assessment Guide Proposal NEWS ITEMS 3 June 2008: WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy today announced submittal of a License Application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeking authorization to construct America's first repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. (http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov) 8

468

Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review Workgroup 1 Meeting Notes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review Workgroup 1 Meeting Notes Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:00 - 3:00 pm PNGC Board Room, Portland OverviewSummary Previous action items were...

469

Senior Technical Safety Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1175-2013 October 2013 DOE STANDARD SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1175-2013 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Website at http://energy.gov/hss/information-center/department-energy-technical-standards-program ii DOE-STD-11 75-2013 APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managers responsible for overseeing the Federal Technical Capability Program. This Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving the Qualification Standard for Department-wide

470

Negotiation-Collaboration in Formal Technical Giovana B. R. Linhares 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Negotiation-Collaboration in Formal Technical Reviews Giovana B. R. Linhares 1 , Marcos R. S discusses the negotiation-collaboration process: a binomial process mixing collaboration, negotiation and argumentation. We applied the negotiation-collaboration process to Formal Technical Reviews, commonly adopted

Antunes, Pedro

471

Action Item Review and Status  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Corporate Board Waste Corporate Board Action Items Action Item Resolution Action Item Strategic Planning Initiative Optimization Study Resolution Presentation by S. Schneider (HLW System Integrated Project Team) Pretreatment Whitepaper Presentation by W. Wilmarth (Role of Liquid Waste Pretreatment Technologies in Solving the DOE Clean-up Mission) Draft Charter for Performance Assessment Sub-Committee Presentation by J. Marra (Performance Assessment Community of Practice) Final Report from Slurry Transport Workshop In final stages of review and Approval; will be distributed when complete This document is intended for planning and analysis purposes, assuming a continuing constrained budget environment. Every effort will be made to comply with all applicable environmental and legal obligations,

472

Board of Trustees E. William Barnett, Chair  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

3 Board of Trustees TRUSTEES E. William Barnett, Chair J. D. Bucky Allshouse D. Kent Anderson James A. Baker, III Teveia Rose Barnes Raymond Brochstein Albert Y. Chao James W. Crownover James A Hess Rogers William N. Sick TRUSTEES EMERITI Josephine E. Abercrombie J. Evans Attwell Harry J

Richards-Kortum, Rebecca

473

Board of Trustees University of Connecticut  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

5 UCONN 2000 YEAR PROGRESS REPORT #12;Board of Trustees University of Connecticut The Honorable M. Jodi Rell (Governor of the State of Connecticut) (President, ex officio) John W. Rowe, M.D. (Chairman;UCONN 2000 REBUILDING, RENEWING AND ENHANCING THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT JANUARY 2006 FIVE YEAR

Holsinger, Kent

474

Advisory Board College of Health Sciences  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Care Hospital Dr. A. Ray Pentecost, III President Design & Health Mrs. Linda Rohrer President/Owner DPSAdvisory Board College of Health Sciences Old Dominion University 2013-2014 Chair, Ms. Jo-Ann Burke Vice President of Patient Care Services Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters Mr. Larry L. Boyles

475

BERA Board Members, Brookhaven Employees Recreation Association (BERA)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Board Members Board Members as of May 2012 BERA Administrative Manual - May 2012 (pdf) Name Term Phone Bldg. E-Mail Fax Susan Wells - President 2014 7427 1005S swells@bnl.gov 2151 Terry Maugeri - Vice President 2016 5980 400B maugeri@bnl.gov - John Addessi - Executive Board Member 2016 7268 911A addessi@bnl.gov 5954 Cris Caccavale - Executive Board Member 2016 5341 400A caccavale@bnl.gov 2940 Christine Herbst - Executive Board Member 2016 7101 902 herbst@bnl.gov 3395 Ruth Comas - Executive Board Member 2014 3545 488 comas@bnl.gov 2069 Augie Hoffmann - Executive Board Member 2014 3884 510A ahoff@bnl.gov 5078 Linda Barrett - Executive Board Member 2014 5165 400D lbarrett@bnl.gov 6243 Affiliates Jeffrey Swenson - Staff Services Manager 2525 179B swenson@bnl.gov 2940

476

DOE seeks candidates for environmental advisory board vacancies...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

for environmental advisory board vacancies December 1, 2014 - 8:00am Addthis The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board meets on the second Wednesday of the month. The Oak...

477

DOE and Advisory Board Recognizes Retiring Member for Service...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Advisory Board Recognizes Retiring Member for Service July 7, 2014 - 9:08am Addthis The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB) and the Department of Energy's (DOE) Oak...

478

DOE/Advisory Board Recognize Service of Student Representatives...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Board Recognize Service of Student Representatives April 16, 2014 - 12:58pm Addthis The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB) and the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE)...

479

Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Contacts | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Contacts Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Contacts Mailing Address Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board P.O. Box 2001, EM-91 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Phone Numbers (865)...

480

DOE seeks candidates for environmental advisory board vacancies...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for environmental advisory board vacancies November 14, 2014 - 3:34pm Addthis The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board meets on the second Wednesday of the month. The Oak...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "technical review board" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

BUILD YOUR OWN 3D GLASSES! Oaktag (sturdy poster board)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BUILD YOUR OWN 3D GLASSES! Materials · Oaktag (sturdy poster board) · Scissors · Clear tape · Basic or sturdy poster board. Cut the glasses out making sure to also cut out the eyeholes. Step 3 Tape the red

Christian, Eric

482

On Board Fuel Quality Sensor | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

On Board Fuel Quality Sensor On Board Fuel Quality Sensor Presentation given at the 2007 Diesel Engine-Efficiency & Emissions Research Conference (DEER 2007). 13-16 August, 2007,...

483

Analyses of Hydrogen Storage Materials and On-Board Systems ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Analyses of Hydrogen Storage Materials and On-Board Systems Analyses of Hydrogen Storage Materials and On-Board Systems Presentation by Stephen Lasher of TIAX for Joint Meeting on...

484

MMU Sustainability Investment Board 1 Communication Framework (Final) February 2009  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) Green Travel Planning (TRA) Communication (COM) MMU Sustainability Metric Area of Sustainability UnitMMU Sustainability Investment Board 1 Communication Framework (Final) February 2009 MMU Sustainability Investment Board (SIB) Communications Framework Effective communications will be fundamental

485

DOE Appoints Three New Advisory Board Members | Department of...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

members to its advisory board. The agency appointed Noel Berry, Mary Hatcher and Wanda Smith for two-year terms to the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB), a federally...

486

Regional Water Quality Control Boards | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Regional Water Quality Control BoardsLegal Abstract California Regional Water Quality Control Boards,...

487

Regional Water Board NPDES Program Manager | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Regional Water Board NPDES Program ManagerLegal Abstract Regional Water Board NPDES Program Manager,...

488

The Energy Demand Forecasting System of the National Energy Board  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper presents the National Energy Boards long term energy demand forecasting model in its present state of ... results of recent research at the NEB. Energy demand forecasts developed with the aid of this....

R. A. Preece; L. B. Harsanyi; H. M. Webster

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells for electrical power generation on-board commercial airplanes.  

SciTech Connect

Deployed on a commercial airplane, proton exchange membrane fuel cells may offer emissions reductions, thermal efficiency gains, and enable locating the power near the point of use. This work seeks to understand whether on-board fuel cell systems are technically feasible, and, if so, if they offer a performance advantage for the airplane as a whole. Through hardware analysis and thermodynamic and electrical simulation, we found that while adding a fuel cell system using today's technology for the PEM fuel cell and hydrogen storage is technically feasible, it will not likely give the airplane a performance benefit. However, when we re-did the analysis using DOE-target technology for the PEM fuel cell and hydrogen storage, we found that the fuel cell system would provide a performance benefit to the airplane (i.e., it can save the airplane some fuel), depending on the way it is configured.

Curgus, Dita Brigitte; Munoz-Ramos, Karina (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM); Pratt, Joseph William; Akhil, Abbas Ali (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM); Klebanoff, Leonard E.; Schenkman, Benjamin L. (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM)

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

490

Federal Technical Capability Manual  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Federal Technical Capability Manual provides the process for the recruitment, deployment, development, and retention of Federal personnel with the demonstrated technical capability to safely accomplish the Departments missions and responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities. Canceled by DOE M 426.1-1A. Does not cancel other directives.

2000-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

491

About Technical Assistance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

As technologies proceed along the development pipeline, most face major hurdles as they attempt to enter commercial markets. Our Technical Assistance program helps lower a range of institutional barriers to prepare innovative, energy-efficient technologies and energy management systems for full commercial deployment. These projects and activities address barriers that are not technical, Technology Readiness Level 9.

492

Depleted Uranium Technical Brief  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological healthDepleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air

493

Federal Technical Capability  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

To define requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Chg. 1 dated 9-20-11 Cancels DOE O 426.1. Cancels DOE P 426.1.

2009-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

494

Technical College Buildings  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... should have such a paucity of literature dealing with material needs in the matter of buildings and equipment necessary for its field of activity. Books dealing with laboratories can be ... is therefore to be specially welcomed, particularly at the present time when the demands for buildings for technical education are so marked (London: Association of Technical Institutions and the Association ...

1935-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

495

State Oil and Gas Board State Oil and Gas Board Address Place Zip Website  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

State Oil and Gas Board Address Place Zip Website State Oil and Gas Board Address Place Zip Website Alabama Oil and Gas Board Alabama Oil and Gas Board Hackberry Lane Tuscaloosa Alabama http www gsa state al us ogb ogb html Alaska Division of Oil and Gas Alaska Division of Oil and Gas W th Ave Suite Anchorage Alaska http dog dnr alaska gov Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission W th Ave Ste Anchorage Alaska http doa alaska gov ogc Arizona Oil and Gas Commission Arizona Oil and Gas Commission W Congress Street Suite Tucson Arizona http www azogcc az gov Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission Natural Resources Dr Ste Little Rock Arkansas http www aogc state ar us JDesignerPro JDPArkansas AR Welcome html California Division of Oil Gas and Geothermal Resources California

496

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, the ISRP reviewed a three-year progress report for the Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board's (UCSRB1 Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power & Conservation Council 851 SW 6th Subject: Review of Progress Reports for Upper Columbia Programmatic Habitat Restoration Projects (#2010

497

Richard H. Truly Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

by President Ronald Reagan. Admiral Truly currently serves on the Board of Directors of Xcel Energy, Tetra Tech

498

Electrical and Electronics Technical Team Roadmap  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

33This 33This roadmap is a document of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership. U.S. DRIVE (Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle efficiency and Energy sustainability) is a voluntary, non-binding, and nonlegal partnership among the U.S. Department of Energy; USCAR, representing Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors; Tesla Motors; five energy companies -BP America, Chevron Corporation, Phillips 66 Company, ExxonMobil Corporation, and Shell Oil Products US; two utilities - Southern California Edison and DTE Energy; and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Electrical and Electronics Technical Team Roadmap June 2013 HV Battery 120/220 V AC On-Board Battery Charger Bi-directional DC/DC Converter Electric Motor Inverter DC-DC

499

Rediness Review Team Leader Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LEADER LEADER TRAINING Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Michael Hillman DOE-HSS HQ Dan M. Stover, PE Technical And Professional Services, Inc. November 10 2010 Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training November 10, 2010 READINESS REVIEW TEAM LEADER TRAINING Introduction & Course Conduct Readiness Review Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TEAM LEADER TRAINING Purpose of this Course Provide prospective Readiness Review Team Leaders with: -An understanding of the Team Leader Roles and Responsibilities -Methods to control team dynamics -Methods to manage interaction with the assessed organization Methods to manage interaction with the assessed organization

500

DOE Technical Standards Program: Topical Committees  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Topical Committee Topical Committee Office of Nuclear Safety Internet Linkage for TSP Topical Committees In the interest of optimum technology transfer, the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) has set up a network of topical committees. These committees provide a forum for communication across the DOE complex on technical standards related activities. If you would like information about a specific topical committee, or wish to join one of the groups, we've provided a roster of TSP Topical Committees and corresponding Topical Committee Chairpersons. Expectations of DOE Topical Committees The March 9, 1998 memorandum (provided here in web page format) from Rick Serbu, Technical Standards Program (TSP) Manager, EH-31, to J. Robert Wayland, Metrology Topical Committee Secretary, Sandia National Laboratories, discusses general TSP expectations of DOE topical standards committees. This memorandum should be reviewed by all DOE/contractor personnel involved in topical committee activities.