National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for technical review board

  1. The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update ...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update...

  2. Perspectives from the Board's Technical Staff

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    from the Board's Technical Staff AP Poloski, S Sircar, MW Dunlevy, F Bamdad, SA Stokes June 5, 2012 This presentation contains information collected by the Board's technical staff ...

  3. Technical Review Panel Report

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Evaluation and Identification of future R&D on eight Advanced Reactor Concepts, conducted April - September 2012 December 2012 Public release version 2 Public release version 3 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the Technical Review Panel

  4. PMCDP Certification Review Board | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Review Board PMCDP Certification Review Board FPD certification is awarded through a chartered and structured Board process. The PMCDP's Certification Review Board (CRB) is the governing body responsible for granting FPD certifications and developing and approving PMCDP policies, training and certification requirements. The CRB meets quarterly throughout the year, and convenes ad-hoc certification approval sessions (for Level I and II certifications only) during the months between meetings -

  5. ORISE: Oak Ridge Sitewide Institutional Review Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Oak Ridge Sitewide Institutional Review Board The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule, requires that each institution that engages in...

  6. Independent technical review, handbook

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-01

    Purpose Provide an independent engineering review of the major projects being funded by the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. The independent engineering review will address questions of whether the engineering practice is sufficiently developed to a point where a major project can be executed without significant technical problems. The independent review will focus on questions related to: (1) Adequacy of development of the technical base of understanding; (2) Status of development and availability of technology among the various alternatives; (3) Status and availability of the industrial infrastructure to support project design, equipment fabrication, facility construction, and process and program/project operation; (4) Adequacy of the design effort to provide a sound foundation to support execution of project; (5) Ability of the organization to fully integrate the system, and direct, manage, and control the execution of a complex major project.

  7. Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Carr, R.B.; Denney, R.M.

    1981-07-01

    The Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review is published to inform readers of various technical activities within the Department, promote exchange of ideas, and give credit to personnel who are achieving the results. The report is presented in two parts: technical achievements and publication abstracts. The first is divided into seven sections, each of which reports on an engineering division and its specific activities related to nuclear tests, nuclear explosives, weapons, energy systems, engineering sciences, magnetic fusion, and materials fabrication.

  8. Mechanical engineering department technical review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Carr, R.B. Denney, R.M.

    1981-01-01

    The Mechanical Engineering Department Technical Review is published to: (1) inform the readers of various technical activities within the department, (2) promote exchange of ideas, and (3) give credit to the personnel who are achieving the results. The report is formatted into two parts: technical acievements and publication abstracts. The first is divided into eight sections, one for each division in the department providing the reader with the names of the personnel and the division accomplishing the work.

  9. External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Services Waste Management Tank Waste and Waste Processing External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download March 31, 2006 Hanford ETR...

  10. Mechanical Engineering Department technical review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Carr, R.B.; Abrahamson, L.; Denney, R.M.; Dubois, B.E

    1982-01-01

    Technical achievements and publication abstracts related to research in the following Divisions of Lawrence Livermore Laboratory are reported in this biannual review: Nuclear Fuel Engineering; Nuclear Explosives Engineering; Weapons Engineering; Energy Systems Engineering; Engineering Sciences; Magnetic Fusion Engineering; and Material Fabrication. (LCL)

  11. External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download November 15, 2012 External Technical Review Report This document has been developed to guide individuals and teams who will be involved in External Technical Reviews (ETR) of U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) projects. September 1, 2011 Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 Full Document and Summary Versions are

  12. Fermilab | Directorate | LBNF/DUNE Resources Review Boards

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Resources Review Boards Meetings of the Fermilab Resources Review Boards All information about meetings, including Agenda and documents can be found in the InDiCo pages (access requires authorization). Chair: J. Lykken Secretariat: M. Hronek The Resources Review Boards (RRB) are composed of representatives of all funding agencies that sponsor LBNF and DUNE, and of the Fermilab management. The RRB provides focused monitoring and detailed oversight of each of the Projects. The Fermilab Director in

  13. Salt Waste Processing Facility, Line Management Review Board Charter

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Line Management Review Board (LMRB) serves an important oversight function to monitor the readiness processes and associated deliverables for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The...

  14. EPA - National Remedy Review Board webpage | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Abstract This webpage provides information on the National Remedy Review Board. Author Environmental Protection Agency Published Environmental Protection Agency, 2014 DOI Not...

  15. EM Reviews Budget, Technology Challenges with Advisory Board...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EM Reviews Budget, Technology Challenges with Advisory Board June 21, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Alice Williams, left, and EM Senior ...

  16. Salt Waste Processing Facility, Line Management Review Board...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Line Management Review Board Charter Salt Waste Processing Facility, Line Management ... processes and associated deliverables for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). ...

  17. External Technical Review Report | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PDF icon External Technical Review Report More Documents & Publications Technology Readiness Assessment Report Compilation of ETR Summaries Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility ...

  18. AUDIT REPORT Energy Savings Performance Contract Review Board

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Review Board OAI-L-16-04 December 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 4, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE OFFICE FROM: Debra K. Solmonson, Director Eastern Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Energy Savings Performance Contract Review Board" BACKGROUND Department of Energy (Department) sites use

  19. Indirect Comprehensive Review Board (ICRB). Final Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-12-01

    Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) used a systems engineering approach to take the first step toward defining a requirements baseline for all indirect work at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. The intent of this effort was to define the requirements for indirect work, identify the activities necessary to meet the requirements, and to produce defensible cost estimates for the work. The result of this effort is a scrubbed-down, defensible budget for all indirect work in FY 1997. Buying power for each dollar of direct work was increased by $.02. Recommendations are identified for improvements to this process in FY 1998. The purpose of this report is twofold. First is to report the final results of the 1996 ICRB process, and second is to document the process used such that incremental improvements may be made in future years. Objectives, processes, and approaches are described to provide a trail for future boards. Appendices contain copies of board composition, documentation of the process, as well as the actual training materials.

  20. External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    been developed to guide individuals and teams who will be involved in External Technical Reviews (ETR) of U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM)...

  1. Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analysis Review of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Technical Gap Analysis While both wet and dry...

  2. 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report March 5, 2014 - 12:00am Addthis Foro Energy, Inc. ...

  3. Technical Workshop: Annual Merit Review Lessons Learned on Alternative...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Annual Merit Review Lessons Learned on Alternative Transportation Refueling Infrastructure Technical Workshop: Annual Merit Review Lessons Learned on Alternative Transportation ...

  4. Directives Review Board - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Directives Review Board by Website Administrator Members Organizations Represented Ingrid Kolb, Chair Office of Management Office of International Affairs Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs Office of Chief Financial Officer Office of Inspector General Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Office of Public Affairs Energy Information Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Western Area

  5. Independent technical review of the Pinellas Plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-07-01

    This report documents an Independent Technical Review (ITR) of facilities, organizations, plans, activities and various other elements required to successfully transition the Pinellas Plant from Defense Program (DP) funded operation to either community developed reuse or safe deactivation leading to decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). The review was conducted at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE) Deputy Assistant Secretary for Facility Transition and Management (EM-60) and is a consensus of the nine member ITR Team.

  6. Independent Technical Review of the X-740 Groundwater Remedy, Portsmouth,

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Ohio: Technical Evaluation and Recommendations (Technical Report) | SciTech Connect Independent Technical Review of the X-740 Groundwater Remedy, Portsmouth, Ohio: Technical Evaluation and Recommendations Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Independent Technical Review of the X-740 Groundwater Remedy, Portsmouth, Ohio: Technical Evaluation and Recommendations Two major remedial campaigns have been applied to a plume of trichloroethene (TCE) contaminated groundwater near the former

  7. Science and Technology Review March 2012 (Technical Report) ...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Technical Report: Science and Technology Review March 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review March 2012 This month's issue has the following ...

  8. Independent technical review of the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-06-01

    This report documents an Independent Technical Review (ITR) of the facilities, organizations, plans, and activities required to transition particular elements of the Mound Plant from Defense Program (DP) funded operation as appropriate either to community developed reuse or safe deactivation leading to decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). The review was conducted at the request of the Dr. Willis Bixby, Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy EM-60, Office of Facility Transition and Management and is a consensus of the nine member ITR Team. Information for the review was drawn from documents provided to the ITR Team by the Miamisburg Area Office (MB) of the DOE, EG&G, the City of Miamisburg, and others; and from presentations, discussions, interviews, and facility inspections at the Mound Plant during the weeks of March 14 and March 28, 1994. During the week of April 25, 1994, the ITR Team met at Los Alamos, New Mexico to develop consensus recommendations. A presentation of the core recommendations was made at the Mound Plant on May 5, 1994. This is an independent assessment of information available to, and used by, the Mound Plant personnel. Repetition of the information is not meant to imply discovery by the ITR Team. Team members, however, acting as independent reviewers, frequently assess the information from a perspective that differs significantly from that of the Mound Plant personnel. The report is based on information obtained and conditions observed during the March 1994 review interval. The ITR process and normal site work often initiate rapid, beneficial changes in understanding and organization immediately following the review. These changes frequently alter conditions observed during the review, but the report does not address changes subsequent to the review interval.

  9. Advance Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Public Report | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Advance Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Public Report Advance Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Public Report The Office of Nuclear Energy supports research and development for advanced reactor technologies. This report documents the results of the 2014 Technical Review Panel (TRP) review of seven advanced reactor concepts. The intent of the process was to identify research and development needs for advanced reactor concepts in order to inform Department of Energy

  10. NREL: Transmission Grid Integration - Technical Review Committee Principles

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    for Integration Studies Technical Review Committee Principles for Integration Studies Working with the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the Utility Wind Integration Group has issued a set of principles for Technical Review Committee participation in wind integration studies. Coming from years of Utility Wind Integration Group and NREL Technical Review Committee involvement in a number of wind integration studies, this document provides guidance for

  11. Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Rosemarie Bartlett, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory View the Presentation PDF icon Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review More Documents & Publications PNNL: Codes Portfolio - 2015 Peer Review Building Energy Codes Program - 2014 BTO Peer Review Building Energy Codes Program Overview -

  12. External Technical Review Report for Small Column Ion Exchange...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Report for Small Column Ion Exchange Technology at Savannah River Site External Technical Review Report for Small Column Ion Exchange Technology at Savannah River Site Full ...

  13. Final report of the systems engineering technical advisory board for the Tank Waste Remediation Program

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Baranowski, F.P.; Goodlett, C.B.; Beard, S.J.; Duckworth, J.P.; Schneider, A.; Zahn, L.L.

    1993-03-01

    The Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) is one segment of the environmental restoration program at the Hanford site. The scope is to retrieve the contents of both the single shell and double shell tanks and process the wastes into forms acceptable for long term storage and/or permanent disposal. The quantity of radioactive waste in tanks is significantly larger and substantially more complex in composition than the radioactive waste stored in tanks at other DOE sites. The waste is stored in 149 single shell tanks and 28 double shell tanks. The waste was produced over a period from the mid 1940s to the present. The single shell tanks have exceeded their design life and are experiencing failures. The oldest of the double shell tanks are approaching their design life. Spar double shell tank waste volume is limited. The priorities in the Board`s view are to manage safely the waste tank farms, accelerate emptying of waste tanks, provide spare tank capacity and assure a high degree of confidence in performance of the TWRS integrated program. At its present design capacity, the glass vitrification plant (HWVP) will require a period of about 15 years to empty the double shell tanks; the addition of the waste in single shell tanks adds another 100 years. There is an urgent need to initiate now a well focused and centralized development and engineering program on both larger glass melters and advanced separations processes that reduce radioactive constituents in the low-level waste (LLW). The Board presents its conclusions and has other suggestions for the management plan. The Board reviews planning schedules for accelerating the TWRS program.

  14. Independent Oversight Review, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project This report provides the results of an independent...

  15. Utah - UC 54-14 - Utility Facility Review Board Act | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Utah - UC 54-14 - Utility Facility Review Board Act Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Utah - UC 54-14 - Utility...

  16. H.A.R. 13-197 - Hawai`i Historic Places Review Board | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: H.A.R. 13-197 - Hawaii Historic Places Review BoardLegal Abstract The regulations under this...

  17. 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report March 5, 2014 - 12:00am Addthis Foro Energy, Inc. partners with the United States Department of Energy to commercialize high power lasers for the oil, natural gas, geothermal, and mining industries. photo courtesy of Foro Energy Foro Energy, Inc. partners with the United States Department of Energy to commercialize high power lasers for the

  18. External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process | Department of Energy for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download PDF icon External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in

  19. HFBR: Review of the technical specifications against the FSAR

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rao, D.V.; Ross, S.B.; Claiborne, E.R.; Darby, J.L.; Clark, R.A.

    1990-01-25

    The purpose of this review is to determine the adequacy of the High Flux Beam Reactor (HFBR) Technical Specifications for 40 MW operation by comparison with the HFBR Final Safety Analysis Report, particularly the accident analyses chapter. Specifically, the Technical Specifications were compared against the Design Basis Accident (DBA) Analyses presented in the Addendum to the HFBR FSAR for 60 MW Operation. The 60 MW DBA analyses was used since it is more current and complete than the analyses presented in the original FSAR which is considered obsolete. A listing of the required systems and equipment was made for each of the accidents analyzed. Additionally, the Technical Specification instrument setpoints were compared to the DBA analyses parametric values. Also included in this review was a comparison of the Technical Specification Bases against the FSAR and the identification of any differences. The HFBR Operations Procedures Manual (OPM) was also reviewed for any inconsistencies between the FSAR or the Technical Specifications. Upon completion of this review it was determined that the Technical Specifications are well written and the items commented on should not delay the low power restart (40 MW). Additionally, the OPM is also well written and does not require further modification before restart.

  20. Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Lester to lead ORISE's scientific and technical peer review program FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 14, 2010 FY10-42 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-Oak Ridge Associated Universities has appointed Tony Lester as director of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education's program focused on scientific peer review. Lester has been serving in this role in an acting capacity since September 2009. Tony Lester Tony Lester In his role, Lester manages a research peer review capability that coordinates the use of

  1. RISK REDUCTION THROUGH USE OF EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REVIEWS, TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENTS AND TECHNICAL RISK RATINGS - 9174

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cercy, M; Steven P Schneider, S; Kurt D Gerdes, K

    2008-12-12

    The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) was established to achieve the safe and compliant disposition of legacy wastes and facilities from defense nuclear applications. A large majority of these wastes and facilities are 'one-of-a-kind' and unique to DOE. Many of the programs to treat these wastes have been 'first-of-a-kind' and unprecedented in scope and complexity. This has meant that many of the technologies needed to successfully disposition these wastes were not yet developed or required significant re-engineering to be adapted for DOE-EM's needs. The DOE-EM program believes strongly in reducing the technical risk of its projects and has initiated several efforts to reduce those risks: (1) Technology Readiness Assessments to reduce the risks of deployment of new technologies; (2) External Technical Reviews as one of several steps to ensure the timely resolution of engineering and technology issues; and (3) Technical Risk Ratings as a means to monitor and communicate information about technical risks. This paper will present examples of how Technology Readiness Assessments, External Technical Reviews, and Technical Risk Ratings are being used by DOE-EM to reduce technical risks.

  2. RISK REDUCTION THROUGH USE OF EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REVIEWS, TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENTS AND TECHNICAL RISK RATINGS - 9174

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cercy, M; Steven P Schneider, S; Kurt D Gerdes, K

    2009-01-15

    The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) was established to achieve the safe and compliant disposition of legacy wastes and facilities from defense nuclear applications. A large majority of these wastes and facilities are 'one-of-a-kind' and unique to DOE. Many of the programs to treat these wastes have been 'first-of-a-kind' and unprecedented in scope and complexity. This has meant that many of the technologies needed to successfully disposition these wastes were not yet developed or required significant re-engineering to be adapted for DOE-EM's needs. The DOE-EM program believes strongly in reducing the technical risk of its projects and has initiated several efforts to reduce those risks: (1) Technology Readiness Assessments to reduce the risks of deployment of new technologies; (2) External Technical Reviews as one of several steps to ensure the timely resolution of engineering and technology issues; and (3) Technical Risk Ratings as a means to monitor and communicate information about technical risks. This paper will present examples of how Technology Readiness Assessments, External Technical Reviews, and Technical Risk Ratings are being used by DOE-EM to reduce technical risks.

  3. Science and Technology Review, July/August 2012 (Technical Report) |

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    SciTech Connect Technical Report: Science and Technology Review, July/August 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review, July/August 2012 × You are accessing a document from the Department of Energy's (DOE) SciTech Connect. This site is a product of DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) and is provided as a public service. Visit OSTI to utilize additional information resources in energy science and technology. A paper copy of this

  4. TECHNICAL/PEER REVIEW RECORD FORM PS-3 Pressure System Number

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    TECHNICAL/PEER REVIEW RECORD FORM PS-3 Pressure System Number Component(s) (if applicable) Design Authority (DA) DA Group/Division Note: Excluded Elements require a Peer Review. Peer Review must be completed by one or more DAs not associated with the project. Technical Review is applicable to code compliant components and can be performed by any DA. Type of Review (check) ____Technical Review ____Peer Review Description: Scope of Review: Applicable Code(s): The undersigned have reviewed the

  5. Alcohol Fuels Program technical review, Spring 1984

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1984-10-01

    The alcohol fuels program consists of in-house and subcontracted research for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into fuel alcohols via thermoconversion and bioconversion technologies. In the thermoconversion area, the SERI gasifier has been operated on a one-ton per day scale and produces a clean, medium-Btu gas that can be used to manufacture methanol with a relatively small gas-water shift reaction requirement. Recent research has produced catalysts that make methanol and a mixture of higher alcohols from the biomass-derived synthetic gas. Three hydrolysis processes have emerged as candidates for more focused research. They are: a high-temperature, dilute-acid, plug-flow approach based on the Dartmouth reactor; steam explosion pretreatment followed by hydrolysis using the RUT-C30 fungal organism; and direct microbial conversion of the cellulose to ethanol using bacteria in a single or mixed culture. Modeling studies, including parametric and sensitivity analyses, have recently been completed. The results of these studies will lead to a better definition of the present state-of-the-art for these processes and provide a framework for establishing the research and process engineering issues that still need resolution. In addition to these modeling studies, economic feasibility studies are being carried out by commercial engineering firms. Their results will supplement and add commercial validity to the program results. The feasibility contractors will provide input at two levels: Technical and economic assessment of the current state-of-the-art in alcohol production from lignocellulosic biomass via thermoconversion to produce methanol and higher alcohol mixtures and bioconversion to produce ethanol; and identification of research areas having the potential to significantly reduce the cost of production of alcohols.

  6. 2010 Neutron Review: ORNL Neutron Sciences Progress Report (Technical

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Report) | SciTech Connect Technical Report: 2010 Neutron Review: ORNL Neutron Sciences Progress Report Citation Details In-Document Search Title: 2010 Neutron Review: ORNL Neutron Sciences Progress Report During 2010, the Neutron Sciences Directorate focused on producing world-class science, while supporting the needs of the scientific community. As the instrument, sample environment, and data analysis tools at High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR ) and Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) have grown

  7. Lithium literature review: lithium's properties and interactions (Technical

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Report) | SciTech Connect Lithium literature review: lithium's properties and interactions Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Lithium literature review: lithium's properties and interactions × You are accessing a document from the Department of Energy's (DOE) SciTech Connect. This site is a product of DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) and is provided as a public service. Visit OSTI to utilize additional information resources in energy science and

  8. Technical review of Molten Salt Oxidation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-12-01

    The process was reviewed for destruction of mixed low-level radioactive waste. Results: extensive development work and scaleup has been documented on coal gasification and hazardous waste which forms a strong experience base for this MSO process; it is clearly applicable to DOE wastes such as organic liquids and low-ash wastes. It also has potential for processing difficult-to-treat wastes such as nuclear grade graphite and TBP, and it may be suitable for other problem waste streams such as sodium metal. MSO operating systems may be constructed in relatively small units for small quantity generators. Public perceptions could be favorable if acceptable performance data are presented fairly; MSO will likely require compliance with regulations for incineration. Use of MSO for offgas treatment may be complicated by salt carryover. Figs, tabs, refs.

  9. Board/Committee

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    BoardCommittee BoardCommittee Since the inception of the MaRIE concept, we value the importance of external review. External Advisory Board The MaRIE External Advisory Board was...

  10. L1:PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    L1:PAC.P6.04 Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review Andrew Godfrey ORNL ... From: Andrew Godfrey Subject: Westinghouse Test Stand Technical Readiness Review Jess, I ...

  11. Science and Technology Review October/November 2011 (Technical Report) |

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    SciTech Connect October/November 2011 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review October/November 2011 Authors: Nikolic, R J Publication Date: 2011-08-25 OSTI Identifier: 1113509 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-11-10/11 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 43 PARTICLE

  12. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice35.htm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    December 8, 1995 The Hanford Advisory Board requests DOE-RL to fund one full-time technical person, selected by the Chair of the Board's Environmental Restoration Committee, to work with the Board and the Consistency Team for the duration of the project. This person would be responsible for coordinating Team efforts with Board members, and keeping the Board up to date on Team actions. The technical person would act in a support role to the Board. Board review will occur through the ER Committee

  13. Science and Technology Review October/November 2012 (Technical Report) |

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    SciTech Connect October/November 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review October/November 2012 Authors: Poyneer, L A Publication Date: 2012-08-21 OSTI Identifier: 1057714 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-12-10/11 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 71 CLASSICAL AND

  14. Independent Oversight Review, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC- July 2012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Review of the Long Lead Procurement Processed Used by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC for the Uranium Processing Facility Project

  15. Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant | Department of Energy Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford's Waste Treatment Plant August 2, 2012 - 12:15pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site's Waste

  16. A COMPREHENSIVE TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE DEMONSTRATION BULK VITRIFICATION SYSTEM

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    SCHAUS, P.S.

    2006-09-29

    In May 2006, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. chartered an Expert Review Panel (ERP) to review the current status of the Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS). It is the consensus of the ERP that bulk vitrification is a technology that requires further development and evaluation to determine its potential for meeting the Hanford waste stabilization mission. No fatal flaws (issues that would jeopardize the overall DBVS mission that cannot be mitigated) were found, given the current state of the project. However, a number of technical issues were found that could significantly affect the project's ability to meet its overall mission as stated in the project ''Justification of Mission Need'' document, if not satisfactorily resolved. The ERP recognizes that the project has changed from an accelerated schedule demonstration project to a formally chartered project that must be in full compliance with DOE 413.3 requirements. The perspective of the ERP presented herein, is measured against the formally chartered project as stated in the approved Justification of Mission Need document. A justification of Mission Need document was approved in July 2006 which defined the objectives for the DBVS Project. In this document, DOE concluded that bulk vitrification is a viable technology that requires additional development to determine its potential applicability to treatment of a portion of the Hanford low activity waste. The DBVS mission need statement now includes the following primary objectives: (1) process approximately 190,000 gallons of Tank S-109 waste into fifty 100 metric ton boxes of vitrified product; (2) store and dispose of these boxes at Hanford's Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF); (3) evaluate the waste form characteristics; (4) gather pilot plant operability data, and (5) develop the overall life cycle system performance of bulk vitrification and produce a comparison of the bulk vitrification process to building a second LAW Immobilization facility or other supplemental treatment alternatives as provided in M-62-08.

  17. IMPLEMENTING THE NFPA 805 PROCESS: Observations of a Technical Reviewer

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Short, Steven M.; Coles, Garill A.; Bohlander, Karl L.; Layton, Robert F.; Ivans, William J.; dePeralta, Fleurdeliza A.; Lowry, Peter P.

    2015-04-26

    In June 2004 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) amended its fire protection requirements to permit existing nuclear power reactor licensees to voluntarily adopt fire protection requirements contained in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 805. NFPA 805 is a performance-based standard for nuclear power plant fire protection that is an alternative to the deterministic, prescriptive fire protection requirements, such as 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, that was issued in 1980. One aspect of implementing NFPA 805 is that the licensee adopts the performance goals, objectives, and criteria for nuclear safety specified in the Standard. These goals, objectives, and criteria can be met through the implementation of deterministic approaches or performance-based approaches, including engineering analyses, probabilistic risk assessment, and fire modeling. Licensees voluntarily adopting the fire protection requirements in NFPA 805 must submit a license amendment request (LAR) to the NRC. The LAR provides the new proposed fire protection licensing basis, including the methodology and results of required evaluations and analyses that show how the NFPA 805 performance criteria are met. As of August 2014, licensees have submitted LARs for 26 nuclear power plants, representing 42 nuclear reactor units. Of these, 7 nuclear power plants, representing 10 nuclear reactor units, have been issued a safety evaluation (SE) by the NRC approving transition of their fire protection licensing basis to one that complies with NFPA 805. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) supports the NRC staff’s technical review of the LARs in the areas of fundamental fire protection, safe shutdown analysis, and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA). PNNL, of course, cannot speak for the nuclear industry and its choice of implementation strategies or the NRC staff’s assessment of the approaches being taken to adopt NFPA 805. However, as a reviewer of the technical details of these submittals, PNNL is in a position to observe the array of implementation tactics taken in these submittals, and observe different ways licensees are making the NFPA 805 process work. For example, we see differences in how fire areas are being transitioned, the kinds of plant modifications being implemented, the changes being made to plant procedures, the number and types of recovery actions being credited, and the kinds and extent of detailed modeling being performed in support of the Fire PRAs. As a caveat, we note that it is probably too early to comment on the overall success or limitations of the NFPA 805 process or provide lessons learned for the future. Furthermore, it is not our intention to endorse any particular approach taken in a submittal over another or to critique the industry or the regulator. Rather our goal in this paper is to summarize a set of interesting and useful differences across submittals that may provide context for further future discussions about what we (i.e., reviewers, industry, and regulators) have learned in being part of the NFPA process; and how to best use that information to inform future NFPA 805 activities or other risk-informed endeavors.

  18. 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Technical Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Provided in three sections, this comprehensive technical report assesses 100 projects in the GTO portfolio, based on presentations from GTO-funded principal investigators that were evaluated and...

  19. Hanford Advisory Board Excerpt from Draft December Board Meeting Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Excerpt from Draft December Board Meeting Summary Hanford Advisory Board Page 1 Draft Sounding Board Summary December 12, 2013 Sounding Board - Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework Introduction of process Susan Hayman, EnviroIssues, reviewed the sounding board procedures and noted that each Hanford Advisory Board (Board or HAB) member and alternate is allotted two minutes to share the perspective of the seat and constituency represented. Once all Board members and

  20. Technical Standards

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Review for Technical Standards of Interest Legend: Red = Technical Standards Program Activities and Responsibilities Blue = Directives Program Activities and Responsibilities

  1. 2015 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review (Technical...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    and academia to give inputs to DOE on the Office with a structured and formal methodology. ... Report Number(s): DOEEE--1288 7393 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: New West ...

  2. Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    experts have a reputation for developing creative solutions to highly technical issues and ... of gallons of tank waste from plutonium production at Hanford from the 1940s to the 1980s. ...

  3. Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2015: Technical Cost Modeling for Vehicle Lightweighting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation given by IBIS Associates at 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about technical cost modeling for...

  4. Peer Review of Allison Lo's Presentation By Alex Ramsey (Technical...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Peer Review of Allison Lo's Presentation By Alex Ramsey Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Peer Review of Allison Lo's Presentation By Alex Ramsey Mapping the metal uptake...

  5. U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board: Roles and Priorities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation made by Nigel Mote for the NTSF annual meeting held from May 14-16, 2013 in Buffalo, NY

  6. The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Status Update

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    The Science Behind Cheaper Biofuels The Science Behind Cheaper Biofuels August 15, 2011 - 11:50am Addthis Brookhaven National Laboratory is modeling the metabolic processes in rapeseed plants to optimize production of plant oils for biofuels. Shown above are developing embryos extracted from a growing rapeseed plant. The embryos accumulate seed oils which represent the most energy-dense form of biologically stored sunlight, and have great potential as renewable resources for fuel and industrial

  7. Science and Technology Review October/November 2011 (Technical...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    November 2011 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review OctoberNovember 2011 You are accessing a document from the Department of Energy's...

  8. Independent Technical Review of the X-740 Groundwater Remedy...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... the information into a conceptual model and findings to assist in evaluating the ... to review previous and ongoing remedial activities designed to address TCE contamination ...

  9. Independent Oversight Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    the FSS is not credited for a Performance Category-3 (PC-3) evaluation basis earthquake, but is credited for PC-2 events. The Independent Oversight team reviewed...

  10. LITERATURE REVIEW OF BORIC ACID SOLUBILITY DATA (Technical Report...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    the transfer lines to the Defense Waste Processing Facility. ... for the purpose of this review include temperatures ... boric acid in the organic phase to the sodium ...

  11. Science and Technology Review March 2013 (Technical Report) ...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    March 2013 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review March 2013 You are accessing a document from the Department of Energy's (DOE) SciTech...

  12. Science and Technology Review July/August 2011 (Technical Report...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    JulyAugust 2011 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review JulyAugust 2011 You are accessing a document from the Department of Energy's (DOE)...

  13. Science and Technology Review December 2012 (Technical Report...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    December 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review December 2012 You are accessing a document from the Department of Energy's (DOE) SciTech...

  14. Science and Technology Review January/February 2012 (Technical Report) |

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    SciTech Connect January/February 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review January/February 2012 This month's issue has the following articles: (1) Dawn of a New Era of Scientific Discovery - Commentary by Edward I. Moses; (2) At the Frontiers of Fundamental Science Research - Collaborators from national laboratories, universities, and international organizations are using the National Ignition Facility to probe key fundamental science questions; (3)

  15. Technical Review of the UNET2D Hydraulic Model

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Perkins, William A.; Richmond, Marshall C.

    2009-05-18

    The Kansas City District of the US Army Corps of Engineers is engaged in a broad range of river management projects that require knowledge of spatially-varied hydraulic conditions such as velocities and water surface elevations. This information is needed to design new structures, improve existing operations, and assess aquatic habitat. Two-dimensional (2D) depth-averaged numerical hydraulic models are a common tool that can be used to provide velocity and depth information. Kansas City District is currently using a speci?c 2D model, UNET2D, that has been developed to meet the needs of their river engineering applications. This report documents a tech- nical review of UNET2D.

  16. PNL technical review of pressurized thermal-shock issues. [PWR

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pedersen, L.T.; Apley, W.J.; Bian, S.H.; Defferding, L.J.; Morgenstern, M.H.; Pelto, P.J.; Simonen, E.P.; Simonen, F.A.; Stevens, D.L.; Taylor, T.T.

    1982-07-01

    Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) was asked to develop and recommend a regulatory position that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) should adopt regarding the ability of reactor pressure vessels to withstand the effects of pressurized thermal shock (PTS). Licensees of eight pressurized water reactors provided NRC with estimates of remaining effective full power years before corrective actions would be required to prevent an unsafe operating condition. PNL reviewed these responses and the results of supporting research and concluded that none of the eight reactors would undergo vessel failure from a PTS event before several more years of operation. Operator actions, however, were often required to terminate a PTS event before it deteriorated to the point where failure could occur. Therefore, the near-term (less than one year) recommendation is to upgrade, on a site-specific basis, operational procedures, training, and control room instrumentation. Also, uniform criteria should be developed by NRC for use during future licensee analyses. Finally, it was recommended that NRC upgrade nondestructive inspection techniques used during vessel examinations and become more involved in the evaluation of annealing requirements.

  17. SUPPLEMENTAL COLUMBIA RIVER PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HANFORD SITE: 2006 TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Looney, B; Dawn Kaback; Gene Leboeuf; Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz; Lynn Lefkoff

    2006-12-20

    Prompted by a $10 million Congressional allocation to identify supplemental actions to protect the Columbia River from groundwater contamination beneath the Hanford Reservation, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Clean-up Technology identified twenty-three potential technical projects and then down-selected ten of these for further evaluation. An independent expert peer review was conducted for the ten down-selected proposals. The review panel consisted of twenty-three recognized subject matter experts that broadly represented academia, industry, and federal laboratories. Of the initial ten proposals reviewed, one was given unconditional support, six were given conditional support, and three were not supported as proposed. Three additional proposals were then submitted by DOE for review--these proposals were structured, in part, to respond to the initial round of technical peer review comments. Peer reviews of these additional proposals provided conditional support. For those proposals that received conditional support, DOE requested specific implementation and work plans and assessed whether the plans adequately addressed the technical conditions identified by the review panel. The final list of technology proposals receiving support, or conditional support, primarily focused on understanding and reducing the potential impacts of uranium, chromium, and strontium from facilities adjacent to the Columbia River, with a secondary focus on understanding and limiting the future Columbia River impacts from the large carbon tetrachloride groundwater plume underlying and downgradient of the Hanford Central Plateau facilities. The results and recommendations of the peer reviews informed the final DOE project selections and supported implementation of the selected projects to protect the Columbia River and address groundwater contamination at Hanford.

  18. INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE X-701B GROUNDWATER REMEDY, PORTSMOUTH, OHIO: TECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Looney, B.; Eddy-Dilek, C.; Costanza, J.; Rossabi, J.; Early, T.; Skubal, K.; Magnuson, C.

    2008-12-15

    The Department of Energy Portsmouth Paducah Project Office requested assistance from Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (EM-22) to provide independent technical experts to evaluate past and ongoing remedial activities at the Portsmouth facility that were completed to address TCE contamination associated with the X-701B groundwater plume and to make recommendations for future efforts. The Independent Technical Review team was provided with a detailed and specific charter. The charter requested that the technical team first review the past and current activities completed for the X-701B groundwater remedy for trichloroethene (TCE) in accordance with a Decision Document that was issued by Ohio EPA on December 8, 2003 and a Work Plan that was approved by Ohio EPA on September 22, 2006. The remedy for X-701B divides the activities into four phases: Phase I - Initial Source Area Treatment, Phase II - Expanded Source Area Treatment, Phase III - Evaluation and Reporting, and Phase IV - Downgradient Remediation and Confirmation of Source Area Treatment. Phase I of the remedy was completed during FY2006, and DOE has now completed six oxidant injection events within Phase II. The Independent Technical Review team was asked to evaluate Phase II activities, including soil and groundwater results, and to determine whether or not the criteria that were defined in the Work Plan for the Phase II end point had been met. The following criteria are defined in the Work Plan as an acceptable Phase II end point: (1) Groundwater samples from the identified source area monitoring wells have concentrations below the Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for TCE in groundwater, or (2) The remedy is no longer effective in removing TCE mass from the source area. In addition, the charter specifies that if the Review Team determines that the Phase II endpoint has not been reached, then the team should address the following issues: (1) If additional injection events are recommended, the team should identify the type of injection and target soil horizon for these injections; (2) Consider the feasibility of declaring Technical Impracticability and proceeding with the RCRA Cap for the X-701B; and (3) Provide a summary of other cost-effective technologies that could be implemented (especially for the lower Gallia). The Independent Technical Review team focused its evaluation solely on the X-701B source zone and contaminant plume. It did not review current or planned remedial activities at other plumes, waste areas, or landfills at the Portsmouth site, nor did it attempt to integrate such activities into its recommendations for X-701B. However, the ultimate selection of a remedy for X-701B by site personnel and regulators should take into account potentially synergistic efforts at other waste areas. Assessment of remedial alternatives in the context of site-wide management practices may reveal opportunities for leveraging and savings that would not otherwise be identified. For example, the cost of source-zone excavation or construction of a permeable reactive barrier at X-701B might be substantially reduced if contaminated soil could be buried on site at an existing or planned landfill. This allowance would improve the feasibility and competitiveness of both remedies. A comprehensive examination of ongoing and future environmental activities across the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant is necessary to optimize the selection and timing of X-701B remediation with respect to cleanup efficiency, safety, and economics. A selected group of technical experts attended the technical workshop at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant from November 18 through 21, 2008. During the first day of the workshop, both contractor and DOE site personnel briefed the workshop participants and took them on a tour of the X-701B site. The initial briefing was attended by representatives of Ohio EPA who participated in the discussions. On subsequent days, the team reviewed baseline data and reports, were provided additional technical information from site personne

  19. Science and Technology Review December 2012 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect December 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review December 2012 Authors: Poyneer, L A Publication Date: 2012-11-01 OSTI Identifier: 1059454 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-12-12 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUMM MECHANICS, GENERAL

  20. Science and Technology Review June 2011 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect June 2011 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review June 2011 Authors: Nikolic, R J Publication Date: 2011-05-23 OSTI Identifier: 1122235 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-11-6 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUMM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;

  1. Science and Technology Review March 2013 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect March 2013 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review March 2013 Authors: Poyneer, L A Publication Date: 2013-02-04 OSTI Identifier: 1068998 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-13-3 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUMM MECHANICS, GENERAL

  2. Science and Technology Review September 2011 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect September 2011 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review September 2011 Authors: Nikolic, R J Publication Date: 2011-07-26 OSTI Identifier: 1113902 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-11-9 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUMM MECHANICS,

  3. Science and Technology Review September 2012 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect September 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review September 2012 Authors: Poyneer, L A Publication Date: 2012-08-03 OSTI Identifier: 1056610 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-12-9 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUMM MECHANICS,

  4. Technical Review of Retrieval and Closure Plans for the INEEL INTEC Tank Farm Facility

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bamberger, Judith A; Burks, Barry L; Quigley, Keith D; Falter, Diedre D

    2001-09-28

    The purpose of this report is to document the conclusions of a technical review of retrieval and closure plans for the Idaho National Energy and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) Tank Farm Facility. In addition to reviewing retrieval and closure plans for these tanks, the review process served as an information exchange mechanism so that staff in the INEEL High Level Waste (HLW) Program could become more familiar with retrieval and closure approaches that have been completed or are planned for underground storage tanks at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Hanford sites. This review focused not only on evaluation of the technical feasibility and appropriateness of the approach selected by INEEL but also on technology gaps that could be addressed through utilization of technologies or performance data available at other DOE sites and in the private sector. The reviewers, Judith Bamberger of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Dr. Barry Burks of The Providence Group Applied Technology, have extensive experience in the development and application of tank waste retrieval technologies for nuclear waste remediation.

  5. ESnet Policy Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Board About ESnet Our Mission The Network ESnet History Governance & Policies ESnet Policy Board Larry Smarr Jagdeep Singh Kristin Rauschenbach Cees de Laat David Foster David Clark Vinton Cerf ESCC Acceptable Use Policy Data Privacy Policy Facility Data Policy Career Opportunities ESnet Staff & Org Chart Contact Us Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems:

  6. Technical Letter Report: Evaluation and Analysis of a Few International Periodic Safety Review Summary Reports

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chopra, Omesh K.; Diercks, Dwight R.; Ma, David Chia-Chiun; Garud, Yogendra S.

    2013-12-17

    At the request of the United States (U.S.) government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assembled a team of 20 senior safety experts to review the regulatory framework for the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States. This review focused on the effectiveness of the regulatory functions implemented by the NRC and on its commitment to nuclear safety and continuous improvement. One suggestion resulting from that review was that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) incorporate lessons learned from periodic safety reviews (PSRs) performed in other countries as an input to the NRC’s assessment processes. In the U.S., commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) are granted an initial 40-year operating license, which may be renewed for additional 20-year periods, subject to complying with regulatory requirements. The NRC has established a framework through its inspection, and operational experience processes to ensure the safe operation of licensed nuclear facilities on an ongoing basis. In contrast, most other countries do not impose a specific time limit on the operating licenses for NPPs, they instead require that the utility operating the plant perform PSRs, typically at approximately 10-year intervals, to assure continued safe operation until the next assessment. The staff contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) to perform a pilot review of selected translated PSR assessment reports and related documentation from foreign nuclear regulatory authorities to identify any potential new regulatory insights regarding license renewal-related topics and NPP operating experience (OpE). A total of 14 PSR assessment documents from 9 countries were reviewed. For all of the countries except France, individual reports were provided for each of the plants reviewed. In the case of France, three reports were provided that reviewed the performance assessment of thirty-four 900-MWe reactors of similar design commissioned between 1978 and 1988. All of the reports reviewed were the regulator’s assessment of the PSR findings rather than the original PSR report, and all but one were English translations from the original language. In these reviews, it was found that most of the countries base their regulatory guidance to some extent (and often to a large extent) on U.S. design codes and standards, NRC regulatory guidance, and U.S. industry guidance. In addition, many of the observed operational technical issues and OpE events reported for U.S. reactors are also cited in the PSR reports. The PSR reports also identified a number of potential technical material/component performance issues and OpE events that are not commonly reported for U.S. plants.

  7. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project melter system preliminary design technical review meeting

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eddy, T.L.; Raivo, B.D.; Soelberg, N.R.; Wiersholm, O.

    1995-02-01

    The Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project sponsored a plasma are melter technical design review meeting to evaluate high-temperature melter system configurations for processing heterogeneous alpha-contaminated low-level radioactive waste (ALLW). Thermal processing experts representing Department of Energy contractors, the Environmental Protection Agency, and private sector companies participated in the review. The participants discussed issues and evaluated alternative configurations for three areas of the melter system design: plasma torch melters and graphite arc melters, offgas treatment options, and overall system configuration considerations. The Technical Advisory Committee for the review concluded that graphite arc melters are preferred over plasma torch melters for processing ALLW. Initiating involvement of stakeholders was considered essential at this stage of the design. For the offgas treatment system, the advisory committee raised the question whether to a use wet-dry or a dry-wet system. The committee recommended that the waste stream characterization, feed preparation, and the control system are essential design tasks for the high-temperature melter treatment system. The participants strongly recommended that a complete melter treatment system be assembled to conduct tests with nonradioactive surrogate waste material. A nonradioactive test bed would allow for inexpensive design and operational changes prior to assembling a system for radioactive waste treatment operations.

  8. Type B Accident Investigation Board Report on the November 17, 1997, Chiller Line Rupture at Technical Area 35, Building 27, Los Alamos National Laboratory

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report is a product of an accident investigation board appointed by Bruce G. Twining, Manager, Albuquerque Operations Office, Department of Energy.

  9. Type A Accident Investigation Board Report on the July 11, 1996, Electrical Shock at Technical Area 53, Building MPF-14, Los Alamos National Laboratory

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report is an independent product of an electrical shock accident investigation board appointed by Bruce G. Twining, Manager, Albuquerque Operations Office, Department of Energy.

  10. Science and Technology Review July/August 2011 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect July/August 2011 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review July/August 2011 Authors: Nikolic, R J Publication Date: 2011-06-17 OSTI Identifier: 1113910 Report Number(s): UCRL-TR-52000-11-7/8 DOE Contract Number: W-7405-ENG-48 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA Sponsoring Org: USDOE Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 42 ENGINEERING Word Cloud More Like

  11. Loads Providing Ancillary Services: Review of InternationalExperience-- Technical Appendix: Market Descriptions

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Grayson Heffner, Charles Goldman, Kintner-Meyer, M; Kirby, Brendan

    2007-05-01

    In this study, we examine the arrangements for andexperiences of end-use loads providing ancillary services (AS) in fiveelectricity markets: Australia, the United Kingdom (UK), the Nordicmarket, and the ERCOT and PJM markets in the United States. Our objectivein undertaking this review of international experience was to identifyspecific approaches or market designs that have enabled customer loads toeffectively deliver various ancillary services (AS) products. We hopethat this report will contribute to the ongoing discussion in the U.S.and elsewhere regarding what institutional and technical developments areneeded to ensure that customer loads can meaningfully participate in allwholesale electricity markets.

  12. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    March 4, 2010 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD March 4, 2010 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, introductions and announcements ................................................................................................. 2 Independent review of the draft TC&WM EIS and final report

  13. NNMCAB Board Agenda: May 2014 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Agenda for the May 21, 2014 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation CBFO, WIPP Update, Dana Bryson Presentation DOE, Technical Area 21, David Rhodes

  14. A Technical Review on Biomass Processing: Densification, Preprocessing, Modeling and Optimization

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jaya Shankar Tumuluru; Christopher T. Wright

    2010-06-01

    It is now a well-acclaimed fact that burning fossil fuels and deforestation are major contributors to climate change. Biomass from plants can serve as an alternative renewable and carbon-neutral raw material for the production of bioenergy. Low densities of 40–60 kg/m3 for lignocellulosic and 200–400 kg/m3 for woody biomass limits their application for energy purposes. Prior to use in energy applications these materials need to be densified. The densified biomass can have bulk densities over 10 times the raw material helping to significantly reduce technical limitations associated with storage, loading and transportation. Pelleting, briquetting, or extrusion processing are commonly used methods for densification. The aim of the present research is to develop a comprehensive review of biomass processing that includes densification, preprocessing, modeling and optimization. The specific objective include carrying out a technical review on (a) mechanisms of particle bonding during densification; (b) methods of densification including extrusion, briquetting, pelleting, and agglomeration; (c) effects of process and feedstock variables and biomass biochemical composition on the densification (d) effects of preprocessing such as grinding, preheating, steam explosion, and torrefaction on biomass quality and binding characteristics; (e) models for understanding the compression characteristics; and (f) procedures for response surface modeling and optimization.

  15. Human-system Interfaces to Automatic Systems: Review Guidance and Technical Basis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    OHara, J.M.; Higgins, J.C.

    2010-01-31

    Automation has become ubiquitous in modern complex systems and commercial nuclear power plants are no exception. Beyond the control of plant functions and systems, automation is applied to a wide range of additional functions including monitoring and detection, situation assessment, response planning, response implementation, and interface management. Automation has become a 'team player' supporting plant personnel in nearly all aspects of plant operation. In light of the increasing use and importance of automation in new and future plants, guidance is needed to enable the NRC staff to conduct safety reviews of the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of modern automation. The objective of the research described in this report was to develop guidance for reviewing the operator's interface with automation. We first developed a characterization of the important HFE aspects of automation based on how it is implemented in current systems. The characterization included five dimensions: Level of automation, function of automation, modes of automation, flexibility of allocation, and reliability of automation. Next, we reviewed literature pertaining to the effects of these aspects of automation on human performance and the design of human-system interfaces (HSIs) for automation. Then, we used the technical basis established by the literature to develop design review guidance. The guidance is divided into the following seven topics: Automation displays, interaction and control, automation modes, automation levels, adaptive automation, error tolerance and failure management, and HSI integration. In addition, we identified insights into the automaton design process, operator training, and operations.

  16. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2003 Los Alamos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the March 19, 2003 Board meeting at Los Alamos Site Operations Review of the NNMCAB Recommendation Process

  17. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2002 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 25, 2002 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Review Resolution on Performance Management Plan

  18. SCFA lead lab technical assistance review of the Pit 7 Complex source containment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eaton, D.; Janeday, D.; Woodward, D.; Imrich, J.; Evans, J.; Morris, M.; Reimus, P.; Hazen, T.

    2001-01-29

    On January 29-30, 2001 a technical assistance team (TAT) met with the Pit 7 project team at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to review technologies being evaluated for remediation in the Site 300 Pit 7 Complex and the process for selecting these technologies. Specifically, the project team presented the TAT with a core need to identify technically and economically practicable technologies and methods to stabilize, contain, or control the tritium and uranium in the source areas at the Pits 3 and 5 landfill area to prevent further releases of these contaminants to groundwater and the migration of tritiated and uranium-contaminated groundwater. The approaches and needs for the systems surrounding the landfills were also presented and discussed. With encouragement from the project team, the TAT expanded its focus to include additional site characterization, a water balance model, and computational models. The TAT was comprised of leading technical and regulatory experts from around the country and was assembled by SCFA's Lead Lab in response to a technical assistance request from John Ziagos, Project Manager for the Pit 7 Area (Technical Assistance Request: LLNL No.1). A list of the TAT members is included below and contact information the TAT members and site participants is in Appendix B. To familiarize the TAT assistance team with Pit 7 Complex issues, the project team gave a presentation outlining the site geology, contaminant hydrogeology, land-use issues, stakeholder concerns, regulatory requirements, groundwater flow and transport modeling efforts, pit source characterization efforts, and remedial options. Time for clarification and questions between the TAT and the site team was integrated into the presentation schedule. On the morning of the second day, the TAT reconvened with the site team and John Evans of the TAT presented information about a helium soil gas survey method that could potentially be used to locate and characterize tritium hot spots in Pits 3 and 5. Following the presentation, the TAT gathered independently to identify issues that are critical to remedy selection and to list questions or information gaps that the site is trying to resolve.

  19. Technical Review of the CENWP Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of the John Day Dam Forebay

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rakowski, Cynthia L.; Serkowski, John A.; Richmond, Marshall C.

    2010-12-01

    The US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District (CENWP) has developed a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the John Day forebay on the Columbia River to aid in the development and design of alternatives to improve juvenile salmon passage at the John Day Project. At the request of CENWP, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Hydrology Group has conducted a technical review of CENWP's CFD model run in CFD solver software, STAR-CD. PNNL has extensive experience developing and applying 3D CFD models run in STAR-CD for Columbia River hydroelectric projects. The John Day forebay model developed by CENWP is adequately configured and validated. The model is ready for use simulating forebay hydraulics for structural and operational alternatives. The approach and method are sound, however CENWP has identified some improvements that need to be made for future models and for modifications to this existing model.

  20. Advanced Fast Reactor - 100 (AFR-100) Report for the Technical Review Panel

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Grandy, Christopher; Sienicki, James J.; Moisseytsev, Anton; Krajtl, Lubomir; Farmer, Mitchell T.; Kim, Taek K.; Middleton, B.

    2014-06-04

    This report is written to provide an overview of the Advanced Fast Reactor-100 in the requested format for a DOE technical review panel. This report was prepared with information that is responsive to the DOE Request for Information, DE-SOL-0003674 Advanced Reactor Concepts, dated February 27, 2012 from DOE’s Office of Nuclear Energy, Office of Nuclear Reactor Technologies. The document consists of two main sections. The first section is a summary of the AFR-100 design including the innovations that are incorporated into the design. The second section contains a series of tables that respond to the various questions requested of the reactor design team from the subject DOE RFI.

  1. Report: Technical Uncertainty and Risk Reduction

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    TECHNICAL UNCERTAINTY AND RISK REDUCTION Background In FY 2007 EMAB was tasked to assess EM's ability to reduce risk and technical uncertainty. Board members explored this topic ...

  2. Application of PSA to review and define technical specifications for advanced nuclear power plants

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kim, I.S.; Samanta, P.K.; Reinhart, F.M.; Wohl, M.L.

    1995-11-01

    As part of the design certification process, probabilistic safety assessments (PSAS) are performed at the design stage for each advanced nuclear power plant. Among other usages, these PSAs are important inputs in defining the Technical Specifications (TSs) for these plants. Knowledge gained from their use in improving the TSs for operating nuclear power plants is providing methods and insights for using PSAs at this early stage. Evaluating the safety or the risk significance of the TSs to be defined for an advanced plant encompasses diverse aspects: (a) determining the basic limiting condition for operation (LCO); (b) structuring conditions associated with the LCO; (c) defining completion times (equivalent to allowed outage times in the TS for conventional plants); and, (d) prescribing required actions to be taken within the specified completion times. In this paper, we consider the use of PSA in defining the TSs for an advanced nuclear plant, namely General Electric`s Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR). Similar approaches are being taken for ABB-CE`s System 80+ and Westinghouse`s AP-600. We discuss the general features of an advanced reactor`s TS, how PSA is being used in reviewing the TSs, and we give an example where the TS submittal was reviewed using a PSA-based analysis to arrive at the requirements for the plant.

  3. External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Monica C. Regalbuto Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM Kevin G. Brown Vanderbilt University and CRESP David W. DePaoli Oak Ridge National Laboratory Candido Pereira Argonne National Laboratory John R. Shultz Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Acknowledgements The Review Team thanks Mr. Glyn Trenchard,

  4. Technical cooperation on nuclear security between the United States and China : review of the past and opportunities for the future.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pregenzer, Arian Leigh

    2011-12-01

    The United States and China are committed to cooperation to address the challenges of the next century. Technical cooperation, building on a long tradition of technical exchange between the two countries, can play an important role. This paper focuses on technical cooperation between the United States and China in the areas of nonproliferation, arms control and other nuclear security topics. It reviews cooperation during the 1990s on nonproliferation and arms control under the U.S.-China Arms Control Exchange, discusses examples of ongoing activities under the Peaceful Uses of Technology Agreement to enhance security of nuclear and radiological material, and suggests opportunities for expanding technical cooperation between the defense nuclear laboratories of both countries to address a broader range of nuclear security topics.

  5. 1?10 kW Stationary Combined Heat and Power Systems Status and Technical Potential: Independent Review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Maru, H. C.; Singhal, S. C.; Stone, C.; Wheeler, D.

    2010-11-01

    This independent review examines the status and technical potential of 1-10 kW stationary combined heat and power fuel cell systems and analyzes the achievability of the DOE cost, efficiency, and durability targets for 2012, 2015, and 2020.

  6. Office of Enterprse Assessments Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Office of Enterprise Assessments Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness December 2014 Office of Environment, Safety and Health Assessments Office of Enterprise Assessments U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Purpose

  7. Advisory Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Advisory Board Director Deputy Director Leadership Team Advisory Board Directorate Staff Org Chart ⇒ Navigate Section Director Deputy Director Leadership Team Advisory Board Directorate Staff Org Chart XBD201510-00405-small The Regents of the University of California (UC) are responsible for the University's management and operation of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. The Regents have delegated to the UC President authority

  8. Board Title

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EM SSAB Chairs Meeting Santa Fe, New Mexico September 2, 2015 Consent Order ... Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board Supplemental Environmental Projects ...

  9. Technical criteria for an Area-Of-Review variance methodology. Appendix B

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-01-01

    This guidance was developed by the Underground Injection Practices Research Foundation to assist Underground Injection Control Directors in implementing proposed changes to EPA`s Class 2 Injection Well Regulations that will apply the Area-Of-Review (AOR) requirement to previously exempt wells. EPA plans to propose amendments this year consistent with the recommendations in the March 23, 1992, Final Document developed by the Class 2 Injection Well Advisory Committee, that will require AORs to be performed on all Class 2 injection wells except those covered by previously conducted AORs and those located in areas that have been granted a variance. Variances may be granted if the Director determines that there is a sufficiently low risk of upward fluid movement from the injection zone that could endanger underground sources of drinking water. This guidance contains suggested technical criteria for identifying areas eligible for an AOR variance. The suggested criteria were developed in consultation with interested States and representatives from EPA, industry and the academic community. Directors will have six months from the promulgation of the new regulations to provide EPA with either a schedule for performing AOR`s within five years on all wells not covered by previously conducted AORs, or notice of their intent to establish a variance program. It is believed this document will provide valuable assistance to Directors who are considering whether to establish a variance program or have begun early preparations to develop such a program.

  10. INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE C-400 INTERIM REMEDIAL PROJECT PHASE I RESULTS, PADUCAH, KENTUCKY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Looney, B.; Rossabi, J.; Stewart,L.; Richards, W.

    2010-10-29

    The groundwater and soil in the vicinity of the C-400 Building at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), is contaminated with substantial quantities of industrial solvents, primarily trichoroethene (TCE). This solvent 'source' is recognized as a significant challenge and an important remediation target in the overall environmental cleanup strategy for PGDP. Thus, the cleanup of the C-400 TCE Source is a principal focus for the Department of Energy (DOE) and its contractors, and for PGDP regulators and stakeholders. Using a formal investigation, feasibility study and decision process, Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) was selected for the treatment of the soil and groundwater in the vicinity of C-400. ERH was selected as an interim action to remove 'a significant portion of the contaminant mass of TCE at the C-400 Cleaning Building area through treatment' with the longer term goal of reducing 'the period the TCE concentration in groundwater remains above its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL).' ERH is a thermal treatment that enhances the removal of TCE and related solvents from soil and groundwater. The heterogeneous conditions at PGDP, particularly the high permeability regional gravel aquifer (RGA), are challenging to ERH. Thus, a phased approach is being followed to implement this relatively expensive and complex remediation technology. Conceptually, the phased approach encourages safety and efficiency by providing a 'lessons learned' process and allowing appropriate adjustments to be identified and implemented prior to follow-on phase(s) of treatment. More specifically, early deployment targeted portions of the challenging RGA treatment zone with relatively little contamination reducing the risk of adverse collateral impacts from underperformance in terms of heating and capture. Because of the importance and scope of the C-400 TCE source remediation activities, DOE chartered an Independent Technical Review (ITR) in 2007 to assess the C-400 ERH plans prior to deployment and a second ITR to evaluate Phase I performance in September 2010. In this report, these ITR efforts are referenced as the '2007 ITR' and the 'current ITR', respectively. The 2007 ITR document (Looney et al., 2007) provided a detailed technical evaluation that remains relevant and this report builds on that analysis. The primary objective of the current ITR is to provide an expedited assessment of the available Phase I data to assist the PGDP team as they develop the lessons learned from Phase I and prepare plans for Phase II.

  11. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, CH2M HILL Analytical Technical Services- January 2008

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Evaluation to determine whether CH2M HILL Analytical Technical Services is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

  12. Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2015: Robust Nitrogen Oxide/Ammonia Sensors for Vehicle On-board Emissions Control

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation given by Los Alamos National Laboratory at 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about robust...

  13. Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Robust Nitrogen oxide/Ammonia Sensors for Vehicle on-board Emissions Control

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation given by Los Alamos National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about robust...

  14. Technical Workshop: Annual Merit Review Lessons Learned on Alternative Transportation Refueling Infrastructure

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy connected the Department’s policy and research functions in a June 20, 2014 technical...

  15. Proceedings of the technical review on advances in geothermal reservoir technology---Research in progress

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lippmann, M.J.

    1988-09-01

    This proceedings contains 20 technical papers and abstracts describing most of the research activities funded by the Department of Energy (DOE's) Geothermal Reservoir Technology Program, which is under the management of Marshall Reed. The meeting was organized in response to several requests made by geothermal industry representatives who wanted to learn more about technical details of the projects supported by the DOE program. Also, this gives them an opportunity to personally discuss research topics with colleagues in the national laboratories and universities.

  16. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice22.htm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    submits the report, "Technical Team Review of Proposed New Double- Shell Tanks at Hanford" to the Tri-Parties. This report was prepared by Glenn Paulson, Ph.D.; Frank Parker, Ph.D.; and Michael Kavanaugh, Ph.D. The HAB adopted the following consensus advice recomendations from this report. Recommendations Based Upon the TECHNICAL TEAM REVIEW OF PROPOSED NEW DOUBLE-SHELL TANKS The Hanford Advisory Board urges DOE to evaluate, as a top TWRS priority, the possibility of a 102- SY

  17. Technical Review of Law Enforcement Standards and Guides Relative to Incident Management

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Stenner, Robert D.; Salter, R.; Stanton, J. R.; Fisher, D.

    2009-03-24

    In an effort to locate potential law enforcement-related standards that support incident management, a team from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) contacted representatives from the National Institute of Standards-Office of Law Enforcement Standards (NIST-OLES), National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Secret Service, ASTM International committees that have a law enforcement focus, and a variety of individuals from local and regional law enforcement organizations. Discussions were held with various state and local law enforcement organizations. The NIJ has published several specific equipment-related law enforcement standards that were included in the review, but it appears that law enforcement program and process-type standards are developed principally by organizations that operate at the state and local level. Input is provided from state regulations and codes and from external non-government organizations (NGOs) that provide national standards. The standards that are adopted from external organizations or developed independently by state authorities are available for use by local law enforcement agencies on a voluntary basis. The extent to which they are used depends on the respective jurisdictions involved. In some instances, use of state and local disseminated standards is mandatory, but in most cases, use is voluntary. Usually, the extent to which these standards are used appears to depend on whether or not jurisdictions receive certification from a “governing” entity due to their use and compliance with the standards. In some cases, these certification-based standards are used in principal but without certification or other compliance monitoring. In general, these standards appear to be routinely used for qualification, selection for employment, and training. In these standards, the term “Peace Officer” is frequently used to refer to law enforcement personnel. This technical review of national law enforcement standards and guides identified the following four guides as having content that supports incident management: • TE-02-02 Guide to Radio Communications Interoperability Strategies and Products • OSHA 335-10N Preparing and Protecting Security Personnel in Emergencies • NIJ 181584 Fire and Arson Scene Evidence: A Guide for Public Safety Personnel • NIJ 181869 A Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene Investigation In conversations with various state and local law enforcement officials, it was determined that the following National Fire Protection Association (NPFA) standards are generally recognized and tend to be universally used by law enforcement organizations across the country: • NFPA 1600 Standard on Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs • NFPA 1561 Standard on Fire Department Incident Management Systems • NFPA 472 Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents (2008 Edition) • NFPA 473 Standard for Competencies for EMS Personnel Responding to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents (2008 Edition)

  18. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2008 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 30, 2008 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation DOE, Quarterly Progress Review and Budget Update on Environmental Programs at LANL, David Gregory

  19. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 Subject: Submittal to National Remedy Review Board February 23, 2012 Page 1 February 23, 2012 Ms. Amy Legare, NRRB Chair U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Remedy Review Board 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW MC5204P Washington, DC 20460 Re: Submittal to National Remedy Review Board Dear Ms. Legare, The Hanford Advisory Board is a U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Federal Advisory Committee Act board which has offered advice for the past 17 years to the Tri-Party

  20. SU-E-CAMPUS-J-04: Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT): Review of Technical Standards and Credentialing in Radiotherapy Clinical Trials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Giaddui, T; Chen, W; Yu, J; Gong, Y; Galvin, J; Xiao, Y; Cui, Y; Yin, F; Craig, T; Dawson, L; Al-Hallaq, H; Chmura, S

    2014-06-15

    Purpose: To review IGRT credentialing experience and unexpected technical issues encountered in connection with advanced radiotherapy technologies as implemented in RTOG clinical trials. To update IGRT credentialing procedures with the aim of improving the quality of the process, and to increase the proportion of IGRT credentialing compliance. To develop a living disease site-specific IGRT encyclopedia. Methods: Numerous technical issues were encountered during the IGRT credentialing process. The criteria used for credentialing review were based on: image quality; anatomy included in fused data sets and shift results. Credentialing requirements have been updated according to the AAPM task group reports for IGRT to ensure that all required technical items are included in the quality review process. Implementation instructions have been updated and expanded for recent protocols. Results: Technical issues observed during the credentialing review process include, but are not limited to: poor quality images; inadequate image acquisition region; poor data quality; shifts larger than acceptable; no soft tissue surrogate. The updated IGRT credentialing process will address these issues and will also include the technical items required from AAPM: TG 104; TG 142 and TG 179 reports. An instruction manual has been developed describing a remote credentialing method for reviewers. Submission requirements are updated, including images/documents as well as facility questionnaire. The review report now includes summary of the review process and the parameters that reviewers check. We have reached consensus on the minimum IGRT technical requirement for a number of disease sites. RTOG 1311(NRG-BR002A Phase 1 Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Treatment of Multiple Metastases) is an example, here; the protocol specified the minimum requirement for each anatomical sites (with/without fiducials). Conclusion: Technical issues are identified and reported. IGRT guidelines are updated, with the corresponding credentialing requirements. An IGRT encyclopedia describing site-specific implementation issues is currently in development.

  1. Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2015: Alternative Fuel Tools and Technical Assistance Activities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about alternative fuel...

  2. Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2015: Clean Cities "Tiger Team" Technical and Problem Solving Assistance

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation given by National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about Clean...

  3. Board Title

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Site-Specific Advisory Board Topics and Accomplishments EM SSAB Chairs Meeting ● Santa Fe, New Mexico September 2, 2015  Consent Order  Entered into discussions with DOE and NMED concerning hearings and meetings on the Consent Order to address modifications necessary before December 31, 2015. I. The NNMCAB would like the opportunity to provide input into the priorities and sequencing of the Consent Order work. II. NNMCAB could facilitate discussions with DOE and NMED in a public format.

  4. Technical Assessment of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tank Systems for Automotive Applications

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ahluwalia, Rajesh; Hua, T. Q.; Peng, J. -K.; Lasher, S.; McKenney, Kurtis; Sinha, J.

    2009-12-01

    Technical report describing DOE's second assessment report on a third generation (Gen3) system capable of storing hydrogen at cryogenic temperatures within a pressure vessel on-board a vehicle. The report includes an overview of technical progress to date, including the potential to meet DOE onboard storage targets, as well as independent reviews of system cost and energy analyses of the technology paired with delivery costs.

  5. SCFA lead lab technical assistance at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Baseline review of three groundwater plumes

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hazen, Terry; et al.

    2002-09-26

    During the closeout session, members of the technical assistance team conveyed to the site how impressed they were at the thoroughness of the site's investigation and attempts at remediation. Team members were uniformly pleased at the skilled detection work to identify sources, make quick remediation decisions, and change course when a strategy did not work well. The technical assistance team also noted that, to their knowledge, this is the only DOE site at which a world-class scientist has had primary responsibility for the environmental restoration activities. This has undoubtedly contributed to the successes observed and DOE should take careful note. The following overall recommendations were agreed upon: (1) The site has done a phenomenal job of characterization and identifying and removing source terms. (2) Technologies selected to date are appropriate and high impact, e.g. collection trenches are an effective remedial strategy for this complicated geology. The site should continue using technology that is adapted to the site's unique geology, such as the collection trenches. (3) The site should develop a better way to determine the basis of cleanup for all sites. (4) The sentinel well system should be evaluated and modified, if needed, to assure that the sentinel wells provide coverage to the current site boundary. Potential modifications could include installation, abandonment or relocation of wells based on the large amount of data collected since the original sentinel well system was designed. (5) Modeling to assist in remedial design and communication should continue. (6) The site should develop a plan to ensure institutional memory. (7) The most likely possibility for improving closure to 2006 is by removing the residual source of the Old Town plume and establishing the efficacy of remediation for the 51/64 plume.

  6. Role of the Technical Aspects of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clemente, Stefania; Nigro, Roberta; Oliviero, Caterina; Marchioni, Chiara; Esposito, Marco; Giglioli, Francesca Romana; Mancosu, Pietro; Marino, Carmelo; Russo, Serenella; Stasi, Michele; Strigari, Lidia; Veronese, Ivan; Landoni, Valeria

    2015-01-01

    The increasing use of moderate (<35 fractions) and extreme (<5 fractions) hypofractionated radiation therapy in prostate cancer is yielding favorable results, both in terms of maintained biochemical response and toxicity. Several hypofractionation (HF) schemes for the treatment of prostate cancer are available, although there is considerable variability in the techniques used to manage intra-/interfraction motion and deliver radiation doses. We performed a review of the published studies on HF regimens as a topic of interest for the Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy working group, which is part of the Italian Association of Medical Physics. Aspects of organ motion management (imaging for contouring, target volume definition, and rectum/bladder preparation) and treatment delivery (prostate localization, image guided radiation therapy strategy and frequency) were evaluated and categorized to assess outcome relative to disease control and toxicity. Despite the heterogeneity of the data, some interesting trends that emerged from the review might be useful in identifying an optimum HF strategy.

  7. Science and Technology Review April/May 2012 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect April/May 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review April/May 2012 This month's issue has the following articles: (1) Lawrence Livermore as the 'Go-To' National Security Laboratory - Commentary by Penrose (Parney) C. Albright; (2) Launching Traffic Cameras into Space - The Space-Based Telescopes for Actionable Refinement of Ephemeris project is designing nanosatellites to more accurately determine the trajectory of space objects orbiting Earth;

  8. Science and Technology Review March 2012 (Technical Report) | SciTech

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Connect March 2012 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Science and Technology Review March 2012 This month's issue has the following articles: (1) Honoring a Legacy of Service to the Nation - The nation pays tribute to George Miller, who retired in December 2011 as the Laboratory's tenth director; (2) Life-Extension Programs Encompass All Our Expertise - Commentary by Bruce T. Goodwin; (3) Extending the Life of an Aging Weapon - Stockpile stewards have begun work on a multiyear effort

  9. Perspectives from the Board's Technical Staff

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Iron: FY 2004 Annual Report Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site | Department of Energy of a Permeable Reactive Barrier Using Granular Zero-Valent Iron: FY 2004 Annual Report Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site Performance of a Permeable Reactive Barrier Using Granular Zero-Valent Iron: FY 2004 Annual Report Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site Performance of a Permeable Reactive Barrier Using Granular Zero-Valent Iron: FY 2004 Annual Report Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site PDF icon Performance of a

  10. ARM - ARM Science Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Science Board Board Business About Become a User Recovery Act Mission FAQ Outreach Displays History Organization Participants Facility Statistics Forms Contacts Facility Documents...

  11. ORSSAB Monthly Board Meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly board meetingis open to the public. The board will receive an update on the Transuranic Waste Processing Center.

  12. Annual report to Congress: Department of Energy activities relating to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, calendar year 1998

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1999-02-01

    This is the ninth Annual Report to the Congress describing Department of Energy (Department) activities in response to formal recommendations and other interactions with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board). The Board, an independent executive-branch agency established in 1988, provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary of energy regarding public health and safety issues at the Department`s defense nuclear facilities. The Board also reviews and evaluates the content and implementation of health and safety standards, as well as other requirements, relating to the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Department`s defense nuclear facilities. The locations of the major Department facilities are provided. During 1998, Departmental activities resulted in the proposed closure of one Board recommendation. In addition, the Department has completed all implementation plan milestones associated with four other Board recommendations. Two new Board recommendations were received and accepted by the Department in 1998, and two new implementation plans are being developed to address these recommendations. The Department has also made significant progress with a number of broad-based initiatives to improve safety. These include expanded implementation of integrated safety management at field sites, a renewed effort to increase the technical capabilities of the federal workforce, and a revised plan for stabilizing excess nuclear materials to achieve significant risk reduction.

  13. Applying Human-performance Models to Designing and Evaluating Nuclear Power Plants: Review Guidance and Technical Basis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    O'Hara, J.M.

    2009-11-30

    Human performance models (HPMs) are simulations of human behavior with which we can predict human performance. Designers use them to support their human factors engineering (HFE) programs for a wide range of complex systems, including commercial nuclear power plants. Applicants to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) can use HPMs for design certifications, operating licenses, and license amendments. In the context of nuclear-plant safety, it is important to assure that HPMs are verified and validated, and their usage is consistent with their intended purpose. Using HPMs improperly may generate misleading or incorrect information, entailing safety concerns. The objective of this research was to develop guidance to support the NRC staff's reviews of an applicant's use of HPMs in an HFE program. The guidance is divided into three topical areas: (1) HPM Verification, (2) HPM Validation, and (3) User Interface Verification. Following this guidance will help ensure the benefits of HPMs are achieved in a technically sound, defensible manner. During the course of developing this guidance, I identified several issues that could not be addressed; they also are discussed.

  14. Index to Nuclear Safety: a technical progress review by chronology, permuted title, and author, Volume 18 (1) through Volume 22 (6)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cottrell, W.B.; Passiakos, M.

    1982-06-01

    This index to Nuclear Safety covers articles published in Nuclear Safety, Volume 18, Number 1 (January-February 1977) through Volume 22, Number 6 (November-December 1981). The index is divided into three section: a chronological list of articles (including abstracts), a permuted-title (KWIC) index, and an author index. Nuclear Safety, a bimonthly technical progress review prepared by the Nuclear Safety Information Center, covers all safety aspects of nuclear power reactors and associated facilities. Over 300 technical articles published in Nuclear Safety in the last 5 years are listed in this index.

  15. Independent Peer Reviews

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2012-03-16

    Independent Assessments: DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions.

  16. Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Review past procedures used to write, revise, or maintain a Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard.

  17. Technical Review Report for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Model 9977 S-SARP-G-00001 Revision 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    DiSabatino, A; Hafner, R; West, M

    2007-10-04

    This Technical Review Report (TRR) summarizes the review findings for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Model 9977 B(M)F-96 shipping container. The content analyzed for this submittal is Content Envelope C.1, Heat Sources, in assemblies of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators or food-pack cans. The SARP under review, i.e., S-SARP-G-00001, Revision 2 (August 2007), was originally referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package. The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's, Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9977 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. The Model 9977 Package design includes a single, 6-inch diameter, stainless steel pressure vessel containment system (i.e., the 6CV) that was designed and fabricated in accordance with Section III, Subsection NB, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. The earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, 9966, 9967 and 9968 Packages, were originally designed and certified in the 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with new safety requirements, based on International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, were proposed. The updated package designs were the Model 9972, 9973, 9974 and 9975 Packages, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. Differences between the Model 9975 Package and the Model 9977 Package include: (1) The lead shield present in the Model 9975 Package is absent in the Model 9977 Package; (2) The Model 9975 Package has eight allowable contents, while the Model 9977 Package has a single allowable content. (3) The 6CV of the Model 9977 Package is similar in design to the outer Containment Vessel of the Model 9975 Package that also incorporates a 5-inch Containment Vessel as the inner Containment Vessel. (4) The Model 9975 Package uses a Celotex{reg_sign}-based impact limiter while the Model 9977 Package uses Last-A-Foam{reg_sign}, a polyurethane foam, for the impact limiter. (5) The Model 9975 Package has two Containment Vessels, while the Model 9977 Package has a single Containment Vessel.

  18. INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE BUILDING 100 PLUME, FORMER DOE PINELLAS SITE (YOUNG - RAINEY STAR CENTER), LARGO, FLORIDA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eddy-Dilek, C.; Rossabi, J.; Amidon, M.; Riha, B.; Kaback, D.

    2010-07-30

    Contaminated groundwater associated with Building 100 at the Young-Rainey Science, Technology, and Research Center, formerly the DOE Pinellas plant, is the primary remedial challenge that remains to be addressed at the site. Currently, Building 100 is an active industrial facility that is now owned and operated by the Pinellas county government. Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells recently installed near the southern boundary of the site suggest that contaminated groundwater has migrated off the plant site. In response to the challenges presented by the Building 100 plume, the Office of Legacy Management (LM) requested assistance from the DOE Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation (EM-32) to provide a review team to make technical recommendations so that they can efficiently and effectively address characterization and remediation of the plume. The review team was unanimous in the conclusion that a dynamic strategy that combines a phased implementation of direct push samplers, sensors, and tools can be used to better delineate the extent of contamination, control plume migration, and rapidly remediate the contaminated groundwater at the site. The initial efforts of the team focused on reviewing the site history and data, organizing the information into a conceptual model, identifying appropriate technologies, and recommending an integrated strategy. The current groundwater data from the site indicate a two-lobed plume extending to the east and south. To the east vinyl chloride is the primary contaminant of concern, to the south, vinyl chloride and cis1, 2-DCE are the primary contaminants. The limited data that are available suggest that reductive dechlorination of the TCE is already occurring but is not sufficient to prevent offsite migration of low concentrations of TCE daughter products. The team recommends that DOE pursue a strategy that builds on the natural cleansing capacity of the subsurface with reductive methods including biostimulation and/or bioaugmentation to provide a sustainable remediation system within the flow path of the plume. Additional data will be required to implement this approach and will include: (1) Better delineation of the nature and extent of contamination; (2) Demonstration the plume is currently stable or shrinking; and (3) Demonstration the full reductive dechlorination is occurring. The technical team recommends that DOE use a phased approach to identify residual contamination and to provide rapid installation of remedies. Matrices of characterization and remediation sensors, technologies, and tools were developed by the team in order to match the specific conditions and requirements of the site. The team provides a specific example of remedy that includes the incorporation of a dynamic characterization strategy moving from minimally invasive to more aggressive field techniques, the consideration of multiple complementary remediation approaches based on a spatiotemporally phased approach keyed to the different demands of different parts of the plume, and the integration and sequencing of the characterization and remediation activities.

  19. Type A Accident Investigation Board Report on the January 17, 1996, Electrical Accident With Injury in Building 209, Technical Area 21, Tritium Science and Fabrication Facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report is an independent product of the Type A Accident Investigation Board appointed by Tara O’Toole, M.D., M.P.H., Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health (EH-1).

  20. External Technical Review Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... Telephone, internet and Fax access. Siteproject clearance ... List of initial information needed TITLE:

  1. EE Technical Review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1985-12-01

    Brief summaries are given of electronics engineering work, including: laser engineering, engineering research, nuclear energy systems, engineering services, and field test systems. Individual papers are abstracted separately. (LEW)

  2. NNMCAB Board Agenda: July 2014 Santa Fe | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    4 Santa Fe NNMCAB Board Agenda: July 2014 Santa Fe At This Meeting: Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2014-02 "WIPP Continually Operational" Election of Officers for FY'2015 Update from Liaisons (LANL, DOE, NMED) Presentation San Ildefonso, Environmental Issues, Governor Terry Aguilar Presentation DOE, Technical Area 21, David Rhodes PDF icon Board Agenda - July 30, 2014

  3. Hanford Advisory Board Advice: Testing Safety Culture in Practice,

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hanford Advisory Board Advice: Testing Safety Culture in Practice, Draft 3, Feb 3, 2016 Lead Issue Managers: Dirk Dunning and Liz Mattson Background The Hanford Advisory Board (HAB, Board) has been focused on reviewing, discussing, and issuing advice on safety culture since the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board issued its Recommendation 2011-1: Safety Culture at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant in June 2011. Safety culture terminology has created confusion in our discussions,

  4. SAM Technical Review Committee Final Report: Summary and Key Recommendations from the Onsite TRC Meeting Held April 22-23, 2013

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Blair, N.; Dobos, S.; Janzou, S.; Gilman, P.; Freeman, J.; Kaffine, L.

    2013-08-01

    The System Advisor Model (SAM) is a broad and robust set of models and frameworks for analyzing both system performance and system financing. It does this across a range of technologies dominated by solar technologies including photovoltaics (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP). The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Solar Energy Technology Program requested the SAM development team to review the photovoltaic performance modeling with the development community and specifically, with the independent engineering community. The report summarizes the major effort for this technical review committee (TRC).

  5. Annual Report To Congress. Department of Energy Activities Relating to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Calendar Year 2003

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    None, None

    2004-02-28

    The Department of Energy (Department) submits an Annual Report to Congress each year detailing the Departments activities relating to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board), which provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) regarding public health and safety issues at the Departments defense nuclear facilities. In 2003, the Department continued ongoing activities to resolve issues identified by the Board in formal recommendations and correspondence, staff issue reports pertaining to Department facilities, and public meetings and briefings. Additionally, the Department is implementing several key safety initiatives to address and prevent safety issues: safety culture and review of the Columbia accident investigation; risk reduction through stabilization of excess nuclear materials; the Facility Representative Program; independent oversight and performance assurance; the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP); executive safety initiatives; and quality assurance activities. The following summarizes the key activities addressed in this Annual Report.

  6. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The ORSSAB monthly board meeting is open to the public. The board will hear a presentation and discuss the development of a comprehensive mercury strategy for the Oak Ridge Reservation.

  7. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly board meeting is open to the public. The board will receive an update on the Community Reuse Organization of East Tennessee efforts at the East Tennessee Technology Park.

  8. HAB Hanford Advisory Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    HAB Hanford Advisory Board Annual Report 2014 On the cover: Demolition at Hanford's 300 Area. Hanford Advisory Board 2014 The Hanford Advisory Board would like to acknowledge the following resources used for the content of the Board's Annual Report: * Washington State Department of Ecology website (www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/nwp/index.html) * U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site website (www.hanford.gov) * Hanford Facebook page (www.facebook.com/HanfordSite) * Tri-Party Agreement agency

  9. Hanford Advisory Board Hanford Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Richland Operations Office Maintenance Policy August 9, 2012 Burt Hill and Pete Garcia DOE- RL Maintenance Policy * Events at Fukushima challenged the Department of Energy- Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (PRC) to review our nuclear operations * Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) assessment of Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) identified several weaknesses regarding maintenance of facility systems * October 17: PRC with

  10. Hanford Advisory Board Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    .22.15 Hanford Advisory Board Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings Welcome to this Hanford Advisory Board meeting. The Board appreciates this opportunity to hear your views and comments on Hanford cleanup activities. Your comments will be summarized in the Board meeting minutes. Board meetings are also routinely audio-recorded. If you wish, you may at any time provide written comments to the Board at: Hanford Advisory Board c/o EnviroIssues Hanford Project Office 713 Jadwin #3

  11. Building Energy Codes Collaborative Technical Assistance for...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Collaborative Technical Assistance for States Building Energy Codes Collaborative Technical ... 2014 BTO Peer Review Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance's Building Energy Codes ...

  12. Report to the Environmental Management Advisory Board

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Report to the Environmental Management Advisory Board Evaluation of the United States Department of Energy Environmental Management Strategic Planning Communication Tool Submitted by the Risk Communications Subcommittee Date - June 14, 2013 Background: In December 2012, during an Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) meeting, representatives from the United States Department of Energy (DOE) recommended that a subgroup of the Risk Subcommittee review a strategic planning tool under

  13. Technical Area 21 Integrated Closure Strategy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    At the July 30, 2014 Board meeting David Rhodes DOE, Supplied Information on the Strategy that is Being Implemented to Close Technical Area 21. Information Provided Included Demolition of Buildings Reaming Environmental Clean-up Work and Future Site Use.

  14. Hanford Advisory Board Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings Welcome to this Hanford Advisory Board meeting. The Board appreciates this opportunity to hear your views and comments on Hanford cleanup activities. Your comments will be summarized in the Board meeting minutes. Board meetings are also routinely audio-recorded. If you wish, you may at any time provide written comments to the Board at: Hanford Advisory Board c/o EnviroIssues Hanford Project Office 713 Jadwin #3 Richland, Washington 99352

  15. Energy Department Announces New Technical Review to Assess Black Cells at Hanford’s Waste Treatment Plant

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has assembled a group of independent technical experts to assess the Hanford Site’s Waste Treatment Plant (WTP), specifically as it relates to the facility’s “black cells.”

  16. On-board Diagnostics

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    On-board Diagnostics for Big Data J. Zurawski , S. Balasubramanian , A. Brown , E. Kissel , A. Lake , M. Swany , B. Tierney and M. Zekauskas ...

  17. Utility Sounding Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Tool Conduit Utility Sounding Board Residential Segmentation Six Going On Seven The USB was created to inform BPA on the implementation of energy efficiency programs...

  18. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly board meeting is open to the public. This month, participants will receive an updateon the U-233 Project.

  19. ORSSAB Monthly Board Meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The ORSSAB MonthlyBoard meeting is open to the public. This month, participants will be briefed on the East Tennessee Technology Park Zone 1 Soils Proposed Plan.

  20. Hanford Advisory Board HAB

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Advisory Board HAB Annual Report 2010 Hanford Advisory Board Mission-oriented Policy-focused Diverse Dedicated Robust Inviting Collaborative Hardworking Respectful Creative I n d e p e n d e n t Non-partisan Balanced Involved Communicative Well-informed Pa s s i o n a t e On the cover: Aerial view of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) construction site. Hanford Advisory Board 2010 Hanford Advisory Board at a Glance Chair's Message Follow Hanford Cleanup! 2010 Accomplishments In

  1. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Board members and participants will hear a presentation and updates about the "Oak Ridge ReservationGroundwater Strategic Plan." The meeting is open to the public.

  2. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Board members and participants will hear a presentation and updates about "Sufficient Waste Disposal Capacity on the Oak Ridge Reservation." The meeting is open to the public.

  3. Hanford Advisory Board 2013 Program of Work/Priorities - EXERPT ONLY, SPECIFIC TO TWC MID-YEAR REVIEW APRIL 10, 2013

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    - EXERPT ONLY, SPECIFIC TO TWC MID-YEAR REVIEW APRIL 10, 2013 2/4/13 Page 1 of 7 Topic Relevant Document or Decision Policy Level Issue Action 1 Committee Assignment Timing Comments 6-Month Status (IM, Committee, Advice, Deferred, No Action), identify IMs Cross Cutting Site wide permit Permit TBD Tracking RAP, TWC, PIC, HSEP Post-release of the permit. Review agency response to advice and respond accordingly; Review response to public comment; Want to see follow up on issues HAB raised in

  4. Peer review panel summary report for technical determination of mixed waste incineration off-gas systems for Rocky Flats; Appendix A

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1992-12-31

    A Peer Review Panel was convened on September 15-17, 1992 in Boulder, Co. The members of this panel included representatives from DOE, EPA, and DOE contractors along with invited experts in the fields of air pollution control and waste incineration. The primary purpose of this review panel was to make a technical determination of a hold, test and release off gas capture system should be implemented in the proposed RF Pland mixed waste incineration system; or if a state of the art continuous air pollution control and monitoring system should be utilized as the sole off-gas control system. All of the evaluations by the panel were based upon the use of the fluidized bed unit proposed by Rocky Flats and cannot be generalized to other systems.

  5. University of Delaware | CCEI Advisory Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CCEI Advisory Board Our advisory board is comprised of the following distinguished board members: {Image} {Name} {Affiliation} BACK TO TOP

  6. SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR: SECRETARY OF ENERGY

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR: SECRETARY OF ENERGY FROM: John Deutch Chair, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) CC: Deputy Secretary of Energy and SEAB Members DATE: February 17, 2015 SUBJECT: SEAB comments on the Report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise You requested that your Secretary of Energy Advisory Board review the recent Report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security

  7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Science and Technology development. In light of this, the Board respectfully submits the attached report and recommendations for your review. EMAB members approved this report and subsequent recommendations during the Board's public meeting on May 22, 2014 in Richland, Washington. If you have any questions or comments regarding the reports or recommendations, please feel free to contact either myself or the Board's Designated Federal Officer, Ms. Kristen G. Ellis. Regards, Enclosure 2 U.S.

  8. State Energy Advisory Board Charter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... Each shall serve in his or her respective office no longer than two years. The Board may elect one of its members Secretary of the Board. The Board may adopt administrative rules ...

  9. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CRESP Adopted: February 4, 2016 2016O-03 Page 1 February 4, 2016 The Honorable Monica Regalbuto Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington D.C. 20585 Re: Discontinue funding for CRESP studies from Hanford cleanup dollars Dear Assistant Secretary Regalbuto, The Hanford Advisory Board (Board) is writing with respect to the draft Hanford Site-Wide Risk Review Project's Interim Progress Report (August 31, 2015), prepared by the

  10. Hanford Advisory Board - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Board Hanford Advisory Board Convening Report SSAB Guidance Memorandum of Understanding Membership Nomination and Appointment Process Operating Ground Rules Calendars Advice and Responses Full Board Meeting Information Committee Meeting Information Outgoing Board Correspondence Key Board Products and Special Reports HAB Annual Report HAB and Committee Lists Points of Contact Related Links Hanford Advisory Board Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size

  11. Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8, 2014 Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNSFB) Vice Chairwoman Jesse Roberson visited and toured the WIPP site this week. While...

  12. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2014 Santa Fe | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    4 Santa Fe NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2014 Santa Fe At This Meeting: Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2014-02 "WIPP Waste Disposal to Remain Continually Operational" Election of Officers for FY'15 Governor Aguilar on San Ildefonso Environmental Issues Update from Liaisons (LANL, DOE, NMED) Presentation DOE, LANL Technical Area 21, David Rhodes PDF icon Board Minutes - July 30, 2014

  13. DOE-DARPA High-Performance Corrosion-Resistant Materials (HPCRM), Annual HPCRM Team Meeting & Technical Review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Farmer, J; Brown, B; Bayles, B; Lemieux, T; Choi, J; Ajdelsztajn, L; Dannenberg, J; Lavernia, E; Schoenung, J; Branagan, D; Blue, C; Peter, B; Beardsley, B; Graeve, O; Aprigliano, L; Yang, N; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Perepezko, J; Hildal, K; Kaufman, L; Lewandowski, J; Boudreau, J

    2007-09-21

    The overall goal is to develop high-performance corrosion-resistant iron-based amorphous-metal coatings for prolonged trouble-free use in very aggressive environments: seawater & hot geothermal brines. The specific technical objectives are: (1) Synthesize Fe-based amorphous-metal coating with corrosion resistance comparable/superior to Ni-based Alloy C-22; (2) Establish processing parameter windows for applying and controlling coating attributes (porosity, density, bonding); (3) Assess possible cost savings through substitution of Fe-based material for more expensive Ni-based Alloy C-22; (4) Demonstrate practical fabrication processes; (5) Produce quality materials and data with complete traceability for nuclear applications; and (6) Develop, validate and calibrate computational models to enable life prediction and process design.

  14. 2013-02 "Review Material Disposal Areas at LANL in Addition to Technical Area 54 for Risks Associated with Fires"

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Approved March 20, 2013 The intent of this Recommendation 2013‐02 is to ensure that the appropriate level of review has been given to MDAs other than MDA G at LANL that may be at similar risk in the event of wild fires.

  15. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EM Update and Discussion of Charges to the Board Mark Whitney, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management 2:30 p.m. Break 2:45 p.m. Public Comment Period ...

  16. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board's monthly meeting is open to the public. The presentation and dicussion this month will focus on "Technology Development to Support Mercury Cleanup...

  17. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly meetingis open to the public. This month the board will hear a presentation and discussthe FY 2016Oak Ridge Officeof Environmental Management's budget and prioritization.

  18. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Board members and participants will hear a presentation and updates about the "Y-12 Mercury Cleanup Strategy and Plan for a Y-12 Water Treatment Plant." The meeting is open to the public.

  19. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3 - 4, 2008 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD April 3 - 4, 2008 Portland, OR Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, Introductions and Announcements ................................................................................................ 2 February Meeting Summaries

  20. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5 - 6, 2008 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 5 - 6, 2008 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, Introductions and Announcements ................................................................................................ 2 April Meeting Summary

  1. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4 - 5, 2008 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 4 - 5, 2008 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, Introductions and Announcements ................................................................................................ 2 June Meeting Summary

  2. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    February 9-10, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD February 9-10, 2012 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ................................................................................. 2 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program Updates

  3. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10-11, 2011 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD February 10-11, 2011 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, introductions and announcements .................................................................................................. 2 Confirm November meeting summary adoption

  4. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    March 30-April 1, 2011 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD March 31-April 1, 2011 Portland, OR Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ................................................................................. 2 Confirm February meeting summary adoption

  5. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    12-13, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD April 12-13, 2012 Kennewick, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, introductions, and announcements .................................................................................. 2 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program Updates

  6. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8-9, 2010 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD April 8-9, 2010 Portland, OR Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, introductions and announcements ................................................................................................. 2 Confirm February meeting summary adoption

  7. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    -8, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 7-8, 2012 Kennewick, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program Updates

  8. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2-3, 2011 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 2-3, 2011 Kennewick, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, introductions, and announcements .................................................................................. 3 Confirm March meeting summary adoption

  9. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    June 3-4, 2010 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 3-4, 2010 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, introductions and announcements ................................................................................... 3 Confirm April meeting summary adoption

  10. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8-9, 2011 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 8-9, 2011 Seattle, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, introductions, and announcements .................................................................................. 2 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Annual Updates

  11. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9-10, 2010 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 9 - 10, 2010 Seattle, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, introductions and announcements .................................................................................................. 2 Confirm June meeting summary adoption

  12. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2-3, 2009 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD April 2-3, 2009 Portland, OR Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, Introductions and Announcements ................................................................................................ 3 Confirm February Meeting Summary Adoption

  13. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    June 5-6, 2009 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 5-6, 2009 Kennewick, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, introductions and announcements ................................................................................................. 2 Confirm April meeting summary adoption

  14. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3-4, 2009 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 3-4, 2009 Seattle, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1 Welcome, introductions and announcements ................................................................................................. 2 Confirm June meeting summary adoption

  15. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Board members and participants will hear a presentation and updates about the "Selection of a Remediation Strategy for Trench 13 in Melton Valley." The meeting is open to the public.

  16. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Board members and participants will hear a presentation and updates about the "State of the Oak Ridge EM Program/FY 2016 Budget and Prioritization Planning." The meeting is open to the public.

  17. LANS Boards of Governors

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Steven E. Koonin has been named as an Independent Governor on the LLNS and LANS Boards of Governors June 15, 2012 June 15, 2012-Norman J. Pattiz, chairman of the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) and Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), today announced that Steven E. Koonin has been named as an Independent Governor on the LLNS and LANS Boards of Governors.The LLCs manage the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif. and Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los

  18. Advisory Board Members

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Call for Proposals Submit Proposals Research Subject Areas Types of Proposals Funding for Projects Evaluation and Selection Acceptance and Rejection Deadlines Events Partnerships NSEC » CSES » Advisory Boards Advisory Board Members High quality, cutting-edge science in the areas of astrophysics, space physics, solid planetary geoscience, and climate science. External Richard Aster New Mexico Tech George Fuller UC San Diego Brian McPherson University of Utah Mike Liemohn University of Michigan

  19. Technical and regulatory review of the Rover nuclear fuel process for use on Fort St. Vrain fuel

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hertzler, T.

    1993-02-01

    This report describes the results of an analysis for processing and final disposal of Fort St. Vrain (FSV) irradiated fuel in Rover-type equipment or technologies. This analysis includes an evaluation of the current Rover equipment status and the applicability of this technology in processing FSV fuel. The analyses are based on the physical characteristics of the FSV fuel and processing capabilities of the Rover equipment. Alternate FSV fuel disposal options are also considered including fuel-rod removal from the block, disposal of the empty block, or disposal of the entire fuel-containing block. The results of these analyses document that the current Rover hardware is not operable for any purpose, and any effort to restart this hardware will require extensive modifications and re-evaluation. However, various aspects of the Rover technology, such as the successful fluid-bed burner design, can be applied with modification to FSV fuel processing. The current regulatory climate and technical knowledge are not adequately defined to allow a complete analysis and conclusion with respect to the disposal of intact fuel blocks with or without the fuel rods removed. The primary unknowns include the various aspects of fuel-rod removal from the block, concentration of radionuclides remaining in the graphite block after rod removal, and acceptability of carbon in the form of graphite in a high level waste repository.

  20. FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9, 2011 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE March 9, 2011 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Welcome and Introductions ............................................................................................................ 1 Update on 324 Building - B Cell Contamination ........................................................................... 2 CERCLA Five-Year review

  1. A technical review of urban land use - transportation models as tools for evaluating vehicle travel reduction strategies

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Southworth, F.

    1995-07-01

    The continued growth of highway traffic in the United States has led to unwanted urban traffic congestion as well as to noticeable urban air quality problems. These problems include emissions covered by the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) and 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), as well as carbon dioxide and related {open_quotes}greenhouse gas{close_quotes} emissions. Urban travel also creates a major demand for imported oil. Therefore, for economic as well as environmental reasons, transportation planning agencies at both the state and metropolitan area level are focussing a good deal of attention on urban travel reduction policies. Much discussed policy instruments include those that encourage fewer trip starts, shorter trip distances, shifts to higher-occupancy vehicles or to nonvehicular modes, and shifts in the timing of trips from the more to the less congested periods of the day or week. Some analysts have concluded that in order to bring about sustainable reductions in urban traffic volumes, significant changes will be necessary in the way our households and businesses engage in daily travel. Such changes are likely to involve changes in the ways we organize and use traffic-generating and-attracting land within our urban areas. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the ability of current analytic methods and models to support both the evaluation and possibly the design of such vehicle travel reduction strategies, including those strategies involving the reorganization and use of urban land. The review is organized into three sections. Section 1 describes the nature of the problem we are trying to model, Section 2 reviews the state of the art in operational urban land use-transportation simulation models, and Section 3 provides a critical assessment of such models as useful urban transportation planning tools. A number of areas are identified where further model development or testing is required.

  2. Regulators, Boards, Councils - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    About Hanford Cleanup Regulators, Boards, Councils About Us About Hanford Cleanup Regulators, Boards, Councils Hanford Advisory Board Hanford Natural Resource Trustee Council Environmental Protection Agency Washington State Department of Ecology Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Hanford History Hanford Site Wide Programs Contact Us Regulators, Boards, Councils Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size There are numerous entities involved in Hanford

  3. Results of a Technical Review of the U.S. Climate Change Technology Program's R&D Portfolio

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, Marilyn A

    2006-07-01

    The U.S. Climate Change Technology Program (CCTP) is a multi-agency planning and coordinating entity, led by the U.S. Department of Energy that aims to accelerate the development and facilitate the adoption of technologies to address climate change. In late 2005, CCTP asked Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Energetics Incorporated to organize and coordinate a review of the CCTP R&D portfolio using structured workshops. Each workshop focused on one of CCTP's six strategic goals: 1.Reduce emissions from energy end-use and infrastructure 2.Reduce emissions from energy supply 3.Capture and sequester carbon dioxide 4.Reduce emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases (GHG) 5.Improve capabilities to measure and monitor GHG emissions 6.Bolster basic science contributions to technology development To promote meaningful dialogue while ensuring broad coverage, a group of broadly experienced professionals with expertise in fields relevant to each CCTP goal were asked to participate in the portfolio reviews and associated workshops. A total of 75 experts participated in the workshops; 60 of these participants represented non-Federal organizations. This report summarizes the findings of the workshops and the results of the Delphi assessment of the CCTP R&D portfolio.

  4. SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR: SECRETARY OF ENERGY

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR: SECRETARY OF ENERGY FROM: Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) DATE: June 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Task Force comments on the Interim Report of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories You have charged the SEAB National Laboratory Task Force (TF) to review studies of the DOE National Laboratories as they appear, and to give advice about what your response should be to their findings and recommendations. This

  5. Assessment of oil-pretreatment technologies to improve performance of reverse-osmosis systems. Technical literature review and technologies evaluation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Tansel, B.; Villate, J.

    1992-06-19

    The services provided under this contract include both theoretical and experimental research for development of an appropriate technology for treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons in source water for reverse osmosis (RO) systems. This report evaluates and screens the candidate technologies identified during the literature review in accordance with the approved Technology Evaluation Plan. A short-list of technologies that warrant further study is recommended to be carried forward to the experimental phase. The contamination problems due to petroleum hydrocarbons have been long recognized. However, the treatment technologies available for treatment of petroleum contaminated media are still very limited. Major limitations relative to treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons include: exact chemical composition is not defined; aerobic treatment processes are not effective for breaking down heavy petroleum hydrocarbons; anaerobic treatment processes are slow; and physical/chemical treatment processes are expensive and there is usually additional waste produced during treatment of the contaminated media.

  6. Technical Review Report for the Justification for Shipment of Sodium-Bonded Carbide Fuel Pins in the T-3 Cask

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    West, M; DiSabatino, A

    2008-01-04

    This report documents the review of the Fluor Submittal (hereafter, the Submittal), prepared by Savannah River Packaging Technology (SRPT) of Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), at the request of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Richland Operations Office, for the shipment of unirradiated and irradiated sodium-bonded carbide fuel pins. The sodium-bonded carbide fuel pins are currently stored at the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) awaiting shipment to Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Normally, modified contents are included into the next revision of the SARP. However, the contents, identified to be shipped from FFTF to Idaho National Laboratory, are a one-way shipment of 18 irradiated fuel pins and 7 unirradiated fuel pins, where the irradiated and unirradiated fuel pins are shipped separately, and can be authorized with a letter amendment to the existing Certificate of Compliance (CoC).

  7. Technical Review Report for the Model 9977 Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Addendum 1 Justification for DNDO Contents

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    West, M H

    2008-12-17

    The Model 9977 Package is currently certified for Content Envelope C.1, {sup 238}Pu Heat Sources, either in Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG), or in Food-Pack Can configurations, under Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Certificate Number 9977 and Package Identification Number USA/9977/B(M)F-96 (DOE). Addendum 1, Justification for DNDO Contents,--the Submittal--supplements Revision 2 of the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging for the Model 9977 Package. The Submittal adds five new contents to the Model 9977 Package, Content Envelopes, AC.1 through AC.5. The Content Envelopes are neptunium metal, the beryllium-reflected plutonium ball (BeRP Ball), plutonium/uranium metal, plutonium/uranium metal with enhanced wt% {sup 240}Pu (to 50 wt%), and uranium metal. The last three Content Envelopes are stabilized to DOE-STD-3013. These Content Envelopes will be shipped to the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), where they will reside, and, hence, to off-site locations in support of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO). The new certificate will apply to a limited number of Model 9977 Packages. At the same time, the Submittal requests an extension of the periodic maintenance requirements from one (1) year to up to five (5) years using Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) temperature-monitoring systems to measure the ambient storage temperature in order to ensure that the temperature of the Viton{reg_sign} O-rings for the 6-inch Containment Vessel (6CV) remain less than 200 F. The RFIDs have been developed by Argonne National Laboratory. An on-going surveillance program at the K-Area Materials Storage (KAMS) facility at the Savannah River Site, and an on-going examination of Viton{reg_sign} O-rings from mock Primary Containment Vessels (PCVs) at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) provide the technical justification for the extension of the periodic maintenance interval. Where extended periodic maintenance is desired, the decay heat rate for the Model 9977 Package is limited to 15 watts.

  8. Technical Review Report for the Model 9975-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00003, Revision 0, January 2008)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    West, M

    2009-05-22

    This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), on the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging, Model 9975, Revision 0, dated January 2008 (S-SARP-G-00003, the SARP). The review includes an evaluation of the SARP, with respect to the requirements specified in 10 CFR 71, and in International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9975-96 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The safety analysis of the Model 9975-85 Packaging is documented in the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging, Model 9975, B(M)F-85, Revision 0, dated December 2003. The Model 9975-85 Package is certified by DOE Certificate of Compliance (CoC) package identification number, USA/9975/B(M)F-85, for the transportation of Type B quantities of uranium metal/oxide, {sup 238}Pu heat sources, plutonium/uranium metals, plutonium/uranium oxides, plutonium composites, plutonium/tantalum composites, {sup 238}Pu oxide/beryllium metal.

  9. The Effects of Degraded Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems on Human-system Interfaces and Operator Performance: HFE Review Guidance and Technical Basis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    O'Hara, J.M.; W. Gunther, G. Martinez-Guridi

    2010-02-26

    New and advanced reactors will use integrated digital instrumentation and control (I&C) systems to support operators in their monitoring and control functions. Even though digital systems are typically highly reliable, their potential for degradation or failure could significantly affect operator performance and, consequently, impact plant safety. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) supported this research project to investigate the effects of degraded I&C systems on human performance and plant operations. The objective was to develop human factors engineering (HFE) review guidance addressing the detection and management of degraded digital I&C conditions by plant operators. We reviewed pertinent standards and guidelines, empirical studies, and plant operating experience. In addition, we conducted an evaluation of the potential effects of selected failure modes of the digital feedwater system on human-system interfaces (HSIs) and operator performance. The results indicated that I&C degradations are prevalent in plants employing digital systems and the overall effects on plant behavior can be significant, such as causing a reactor trip or causing equipment to operate unexpectedly. I&C degradations can impact the HSIs used by operators to monitor and control the plant. For example, sensor degradations can make displays difficult to interpret and can sometimes mislead operators by making it appear that a process disturbance has occurred. We used the information obtained as the technical basis upon which to develop HFE review guidance. The guidance addresses the treatment of degraded I&C conditions as part of the design process and the HSI features and functions that support operators to monitor I&C performance and manage I&C degradations when they occur. In addition, we identified topics for future research.

  10. file://L:\\DOE-hanford.gov\\public\\boards\\hab\\advice\\advice78.htm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    for coordinating their assumptions and recommendations, review and public comment, and implementation or utilization. The Board wishes to reiterate its long held value that the...

  11. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technical Advisory Committee Biennial...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Technical Advisory Committee Biennial Report to the Secretary of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technical Advisory Committee Biennial Report to the Secretary of Energy HTAC review ...

  12. Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO Peer Review Technical Assistance: ... View the Presentation PDF icon Technical Assistance: Increasing Code Compliance - 2014 BTO ...

  13. Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for 30...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for 30, 60, and 90% Design of DOE Nuclear Facilities This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical ...

  14. Technical Guidance

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Technical Guidance, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security develops and issues Government-wide and Department-wide technical guidance to ensure that classified nuclear...

  15. Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory- July 2012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Implementation Verification Review at Technical Area-55

  16. Technical Highlights

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Bridge (Technical Report) | SciTech Connect Technical Feasibility Assessment of LED Roadway Lighting on the Golden Gate Bridge Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Technical Feasibility Assessment of LED Roadway Lighting on the Golden Gate Bridge Subsequent to preliminary investigations by the Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District (GGB), in coordination with Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), the GATEWAY Demonstration program was asked to evaluate the technical

  17. Technical management plan for sample generation, analysis, and data review for Phase 2 of the Clinch River Environmental Restoration Program

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brandt, C.C.; Benson, S.B.; Beeler, D.A.

    1994-03-01

    The Clinch River Remedial Investigation (CRRI) is designed to address the transport, fate, and distribution of waterborne contaminants (radionuclides, metals, and organic compounds) released from the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) and to assess potential risks to human health and the environment associated with these contaminants. The remedial investigation is entering Phase 2, which has the following items as its objectives: define the nature and extent of the contamination in areas downstream from the DOE ORR, evaluate the human health and ecological risks posed by these contaminants, and perform preliminary identification and evaluation of potential remediation alternatives. This plan describes the requirements, responsibilities, and roles of personnel during sampling, analysis, and data review for the Clinch River Environmental Restoration Program (CR-ERP). The purpose of the plan is to formalize the process for obtaining analytical services, tracking sampling and analysis documentation, and assessing the overall quality of the CR-ERP data collection program to ensure that it will provide the necessary building blocks for the program decision-making process.

  18. 2015-2017 Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Members | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2015-2017 Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Members 2015-2017 Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Members 2015-2017 Advisory Board Chair and Vice Chair John Deutch MIT Chemist, Former Under Secretary of Energy John M. Deutch is an Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mr. Deutch has been a member of the MIT faculty since 1970, and has served as Chairman of the Department of Chemistry, Dean of Science and Provost. Mr. Deutch has published over 140 technical

  19. Analyses of Compressed Hydrogen On-Board Storage Systems | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Compressed Hydrogen On-Board Storage Systems Analyses of Compressed Hydrogen On-Board Storage Systems Presented at the R&D Strategies for Compressed, Cryo-Compressed and Cryo-Sorbent Hydrogen Storage Technologies Workshops on February 14 and 15, 2011. PDF icon compressed_hydrogen2011_3_rosenfeld.pdf More Documents & Publications Technical Assessment of Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tank Systems for Automotive Applications Analyses of Hydrogen Storage Materials and On-Board

  20. Analyses of Hydrogen Storage Materials and On-Board Systems | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Hydrogen Storage Materials and On-Board Systems Analyses of Hydrogen Storage Materials and On-Board Systems Presentation by Stephen Lasher of TIAX for Joint Meeting on Hydrogen Delivery Modeling and Analysis, May 8-9, 2007. PDF icon deliv_analysis_lasher.pdf More Documents & Publications Technical Assessment of Organic Liquid Carrier Hydrogen Storage Systems for Automotive Applications Cost Analysis of Hydrogen Storage Systems Technical Assessment of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen

  1. Web Operational Status Boards

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2004-04-16

    Web Operational Status Boards (WebOSB)is a web-based application designed to acquire, display, and update highly dynamic status information between multiple users and jurisdictions. WebOSB is able to disseminate real-time status information?support the timely sharing of information?with constant, dynamic updates via personal computers and the Internet between emergency operations centers (EOCs), incident command centers, and to users outside the EOC who need to know the information (hospitals, shelters, schools). The WebOSB application far exceeds outdated information-sharing methods used by emergency workers: whiteboards, Word and Excel documents, or even locality-specific Web sites. WebOSB?s capabilities include the following elements: - Secure access. Multiple users can access information on WebOSB from any personal computer with Internet access and a secure ID. Privileges are use to control access and distribution of status information and to identify users who are authorized to add or edit information. - Simultaneous update. WebOSB provides options for users to add, display, and update dynamic information simultaneously at all locations involved in the emergency management effort, A single status board can be updated from multiple locations enabling shelters and hospitals to post bed availability or list decontamination capability. - On-the-fly modification. Allowing the definition of an existing status board to be modified on-the-fly can be an asset during an emergency, where information requirements can change quickly. The status board designer feature allows an administrator to quickly define, modi,, add to, and implement new status boards in minutes without needing the help of Web designers and computer programmers. - Publisher/subscriber notification. As a subscriber, each user automatically receives notification of any new information relating to specific status boards. The publisher/subscriber feature automatically notified each user of any new information relating to specific status boards. WebOSB can be installed to fit the specific needs of an emergency management community. Because it was originally developed to concurrently support multiple EOCs at the local, county, and state level, it can also support multi-user environments for other types of projects.

  2. Web Operational Status Boards

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    2004-04-16

    Web Operational Status Boards (WebOSB)is a web-based application designed to acquire, display, and update highly dynamic status information between multiple users and jurisdictions. WebOSB is able to disseminate real-time status information—support the timely sharing of information—with constant, dynamic updates via personal computers and the Internet between emergency operations centers (EOCs), incident command centers, and to users outside the EOC who need to know the information (hospitals, shelters, schools). The WebOSB application far exceeds outdated information-sharingmore » methods used by emergency workers: whiteboards, Word and Excel documents, or even locality-specific Web sites. WebOSB’s capabilities include the following elements: - Secure access. Multiple users can access information on WebOSB from any personal computer with Internet access and a secure ID. Privileges are use to control access and distribution of status information and to identify users who are authorized to add or edit information. - Simultaneous update. WebOSB provides options for users to add, display, and update dynamic information simultaneously at all locations involved in the emergency management effort, A single status board can be updated from multiple locations enabling shelters and hospitals to post bed availability or list decontamination capability. - On-the-fly modification. Allowing the definition of an existing status board to be modified on-the-fly can be an asset during an emergency, where information requirements can change quickly. The status board designer feature allows an administrator to quickly define, modi,, add to, and implement new status boards in minutes without needing the help of Web designers and computer programmers. - Publisher/subscriber notification. As a subscriber, each user automatically receives notification of any new information relating to specific status boards. The publisher/subscriber feature automatically notified each user of any new information relating to specific status boards. WebOSB can be installed to fit the specific needs of an emergency management community. Because it was originally developed to concurrently support multiple EOCs at the local, county, and state level, it can also support multi-user environments for other types of projects.« less

  3. [Computer Science and Telecommunications Board activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Blumenthal, M.S.

    1993-02-23

    The board considers technical and policy issues pertaining to computer science, telecommunications, and associated technologies. Functions include providing a base of expertise for these fields in NRC, monitoring and promoting health of these fields, initiating studies of these fields as critical resources and sources of national economic strength, responding to requests for advice, and fostering interaction among the technologies and the other pure and applied science and technology. This document describes its major accomplishments, current programs, other sponsored activities, cooperative ventures, and plans and prospects.

  4. California Air Resources Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Air Resources Board Jump to: navigation, search Logo: California Air Resources Board Name: California Air Resources Board Place: Sacramento, California Website: www.arb.ca.gov...

  5. Texas Water Development Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Development Board Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Texas Water Development Board Name: Texas Water Development Board Abbreviation: TWDB Address: 1700 North Congress Avenue Place:...

  6. Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report- Nevada Site Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report documents the activities and results of the Accreditation Review Team evaluation of the NSO TQP for the Accreditation Board.

  7. Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report- NNSA Service Center

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report documents the activities of the Accreditation Review Team and the results of its evaluation of the NNSA Service Center TQP for the TQP Accreditation Board.

  8. Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Report- Sandia Site Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report documents the activities of the Accreditation Review Team and the results of its evaluation of the SSO TQP for the Accreditation Board.

  9. Technical Qualification Program Reaccreditation Report- Sandia Site Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report documents the activities and results of the Reaccreditation Review Team evaluation of the SSO TQP for the Reaccreditation Board.

  10. Hanford Advisory Board Draft Letter

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Topic: Response to Dave Huizenga's Letter and DOE concerns regarding diversity Authors: Susan Leckband et.al. Originating Committee: Executive Issues Committee The Hanford Advisory Board (Board or HAB) was structured by the Keystone group to ensure a wide diversity of stakeholder opinion through its creation as a "Board of Interests," rather than as a board of individuals, and to focus on consensus across that broad cross section of views. This structure was chosen to ensure that the

  11. Hanford Advisory Board Draft Letter

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Draft Letter Topic: Worker safety and communication restrictions Authors: Bob Suyama, Shelley Cimon, Susan Leckband, Jerry Peltier Originating Committee: Executive Issues Committee Version #1 10.14.15 Draft letter: worker safety and communication restrictions v.1 Since the inception of the Hanford Advisory Board (Board), one of the Board's primary values is the protection of worker health and safety at the Hanford Site. The Board continues to be concerned about the consequences of worker

  12. Hanford Advisory Board FY2014 Work Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1/2013 Hanford Advisory Board FY2014 Work Plan Page 1 of 8 Topic Policy Level Issue HAB Action 1 Agency Priority for HAB Committee Assignment (lead in bold) Comments Site-Wide Tank Closure & Waste Management EIS * Protectiveness * Feasibility * Budget impacts * Schedule impacts * Review proposed/publicized RODs Potential Advice PIC, RAP, TWC River Corridor 618-11 Start in time to end in time Tracking (diligence) RAP 1 Advice, foundational understanding for subsequent year's priority work,

  13. NORTHERN NEW MEXICO CITIZENS' ADVISORY BOARD (NNMCAB)

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    0 Approved on November 19, 2008 NORTHERN NEW MEXICO CITIZENS' ADVISORY BOARD (NNMCAB) Recommendation to the Department of Energy No. 2008-10 Regarding Independent Review of the MDA G Corrective Measures Evaluation Report by DOE Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation Waste Management Committee Background In accordance with commitments made to NMED under the Consent Order, LANL has submitted, on schedule, their report on the Corrective Measures Evaluation (CME) for MDA G at LANL. This report

  14. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice84a.ht

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Governor John Kitzhaber 254 State Capitol Salem, OR 97310 Dear Governor Kitzhaber: The Hanford Advisory Board has reviewed the Department of Energy-Richland (DOE) draft FY2000 budget and provided the enclosed advice to DOE. For four years, the Hanford Advisory Board has conducted in-depth reviews of DOE 's proposed cleanup budgets. The advice from the Board has helped make cleanup more efficient, saving millions of taxpayer dollars. We worked with DOE-Richland to open the budget process and

  15. Environmental Management Advisory Board Members | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EMAB Board Member Read Bio David W. Swindle, Jr. EMAB Board Member Read Bio Robert J. Thompson EMAB Board Member Read Bio Lenn Vincent EMAB Board Member Read Bio

  16. Technical information

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Home> Commercial Buildings Home> Technical Information > Estimation of Standard Errors Estimation of Standard Errors Sampling error is the difference between the survey estimate...

  17. Technical Review Report for the Model 9978-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00002, Revision 1, March 2009)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    West, M

    2009-03-06

    This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE), on the 'Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), Model 9978 B(M)F-96', Revision 1, March 2009 (S-SARP-G-00002). The Model 9978 Package complies with 10 CFR 71, and with 'Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material-1996 Edition (As Amended, 2000)-Safety Requirements', International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9978 Packaging is designed, analyzed, fabricated, and tested in accordance with Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&PVC). The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the DOE's 'Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages'. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., 'Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material'. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9978 Packaging is a single containment package, using a 5-inch containment vessel (5CV). It uses a nominal 35-gallon drum package design. In comparison, the Model 9977 Packaging uses a 6-inch containment vessel (6CV). The Model 9977 and Model 9978 Packagings were developed concurrently, and they were referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package, Version 1 (GPFP). Both packagings use General Plastics FR-3716 polyurethane foam as insulation and as impact limiters. The 5CV is used as the Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) in the Model 9975-96 Packaging. The Model 9975-96 Packaging also has the 6CV as its Secondary Containment Vessel (SCV). In comparison, the Model 9975 Packagings use Celotex{trademark} for insulation and as impact limiters. To provide a historical perspective, it is noted that the Model 9975-96 Packaging is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then-newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The Model 9978 Package has six Content Envelopes: C.1 ({sup 238}Pu Heat Sources), C.2 ( Pu/U Metals), C.3 (Pu/U Oxides, Reserved), C.4 (U Metal or Alloy), C.5 (U Compounds), and C.6 (Samples and Sources). Per 10 CFR 71.59 (Code of Federal Regulations), the value of N is 50 for the Model 9978 Package leading to a Criticality Safety Index (CSI) of 1.0. The Transport Index (TI), based on dose rate, is calculated to be a maximum of 4.1.

  18. Alcohol fuels program technical review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1981-07-01

    The last issue of the Alcohol Fuels Process R/D Newsletter contained a work breakdown structure (WBS) of the SERI Alcohol Fuels Program that stressed the subcontracted portion of the program and discussed the SERI biotechnology in-house program. This issue shows the WBS for the in-house programs and contains highlights for the remaining in-house tasks, that is, methanol production research, alcohol utilization research, and membrane research. The methanol production research activity consists of two elements: development of a pressurized oxygen gasifier and synthesis of catalytic materials to more efficiently convert synthesis gas to methanol and higher alcohols. A report is included (Finegold et al. 1981) that details the experimental apparatus and recent results obtained from the gasifier. The catalysis research is principally directed toward producing novel organometallic compounds for use as a homogeneous catalyst. The utilization research is directed toward the development of novel engine systems that use pure alcohol for fuel. Reforming methanol and ethanol catalytically to produce H/sub 2/ and CO gas for use as a fuel offers performance and efficiency advantages over burning alcohol directly as fuel in an engine. An application of this approach is also detailed at the end of this section. Another area of utilization is the use of fuel cells in transportation. In-house researchers investigating alternate electrolyte systems are exploring the direct and indirect use of alcohols in fuel cells. A workshop is being organized to explore potential applications of fuel cells in the transportation sector. The membrane research group is equipping to evaluate alcohol/water separation membranes and is also establishing cost estimation and energy utilization figures for use in alcohol plant design.

  19. Sandia Combustion Research: Technical review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-07-01

    This report contains reports from research programs conducted at the Sandia Combustion Research Facility. Research is presented under the following topics: laser based diagnostics; combustion chemistry; reacting flow; combustion in engines and commercial burners; coal combustion; and industrial processing. Individual projects were processed separately for entry onto the DOE databases.

  20. SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR: SECRETARY OF ENERGY

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR: SECRETARY OF ENERGY FROM: Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) DATE: June 17, 2015 SUBJECT: SEAB Task Force comments on Aligning the Governance Structure of the NNSA Laboratories to Meet 21 st Century National Security Challenges You have charged the SEAB National Laboratory Task Force to review studies of the DOE National Laboratories as they appear and to give you advice about what your response should be to their findings and

  1. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Production Posts Draft Report | Department of Energy (SEAB) on Shale Gas Production Posts Draft Report Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas Production Posts Draft Report November 10, 2011 - 1:12pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Subcommittee (SEAB) on Shale Gas Production released its second and final ninety-day report reviewing the progress that has been made in implementing the twenty recommendations in its initial report of

  2. Hanford Advisory Board Draft Letter Topic: CRESP Comment letter

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CRESP Comment letter Authors: Harper, Engstrom & Vanni Originating Committee: River & Plateau Version #1 To: David S. Kosson, Principal Investigator with the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP) and Mark Whitney, DOE-EM Acting Assistant Secretary Re: CRESP Methodology for the Hanford Site-wide Risk Review Project Dear Mssrs. Kosson and Whitney: The Hanford Advisory Board (Board) has been asked to provide comments on the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

  3. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2013 Albuquerque | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    3 Albuquerque NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2013 Albuquerque At This Meeting: Waste Management Conference Report Update from Liaisons (LANL, DOE) Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2013-02 "Recommendation to Review Fire Risk Associated with Material Disposal Areas" Presentation DOE, Results of the LANL Aerial Radiation Survey, Tom Carver Presentation DOE/LANS, Status of the TA-54 33 Shafts, Dave Nickless, Dan Cox PDF icon Board Minutes - March 20, 2013

  4. Recent Technical Assistance | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Recent Technical Assistance Recent Technical Assistance Recent activities of the OE State and Regional Policy Assistance Program include: Supporting the collaborative efforts of the Western Governors Association (WGA) and its subsidiary Western Interstate Energy Board on electricity policy issues by conducting various studies at their request. Particular support is to WIEB's Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation as it works to encourage better electricity policy coordination among

  5. Technical Interpretation, NSTI 2003-01

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Technical Interpretation 2003-01 concerns Department of Energy Orders and Regulations for review and approval of the underlying scope, methods, and approaches to implement the Order requirements.

  6. Technical Standards Newsletter - October 1999 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    1999 Technical Standards Newsletter - October 1999 October 1999 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, October 1999 The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSMs) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. PDF icon The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - October 1999 More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - October 1999 Technical Standards Newsletter - November 1999 Technical Standards Newsletter - April

  7. The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force to Support the

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Quadrennial Energy Review Process | Department of Energy to Support the Quadrennial Energy Review Process The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force to Support the Quadrennial Energy Review Process The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force to support the Quadrennial Energy Review Process is composed of SEAB members and independent experts, with experience in energy policy and planning, charged with serving as a resource for the Department in the crucial formative

  8. Hanford Advisory Board Orientation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Member Orientation February 7, 2013 Jeff Frey, Department of Energy - Richland Operations Office Tifany Nguyen, Department of Energy - Richland Operations Office Dennis Faulk, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Jane Hedges, WA State Department of Ecology Steve Hudson, Hanford Advisory Board Chair Susan Hayman, EnviroIssues D020713-2 QUIZ 1. How does the DDFO support the HAB? 2. What does the Federal Coordinator do? D020713-3 Who We Are... * Department of Energy - DOE-RL and DOE-ORP - Jeffrey

  9. Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP) This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and ...

  10. Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management

  11. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Board will provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on the Department's basic and applied research and development activities, economic and national security policy,...

  12. FES Requirements Review 2014

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    FES Requirements Review 2014 Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013 FES Requirements Review 2014 FES Attendees 2014 BES Requirements Review 2014 Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1

  13. BES Requirements Review 2014

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    BES Requirements Review 2014 Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013 FES Requirements Review 2014 BES Requirements Review 2014 BES Attendees 2014 Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1

  14. General purpose programmable accelerator board

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Robertson, Perry J.; Witzke, Edward L.

    2001-01-01

    A general purpose accelerator board and acceleration method comprising use of: one or more programmable logic devices; a plurality of memory blocks; bus interface for communicating data between the memory blocks and devices external to the board; and dynamic programming capabilities for providing logic to the programmable logic device to be executed on data in the memory blocks.

  15. Technical Assistance to Developers

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rockward, Tommy; Borup, Rodney L.; Garzon, Fernando H.; Mukundan, Rangachary; Spernjak, Dusan

    2012-07-17

    This task supports the allowance of technical assistance to fuel-cell component and system developers as directed by the DOE. This task includes testing of novel materials and participation in the further development and validation of single cell test protocols. This task also covers technical assistance to DOE Working Groups, the U.S. Council for Automotive Research (USCAR) and the USCAR/DOE Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle efficiency and Energy sustainability (U.S. Drive) Fuel Cell Technology Team. Assistance includes technical validation of new fuel cell materials and methods, single cell fuel cell testing to support the development of targets and test protocols, and regular advisory participation in other working groups and reviews. This assistance is made available to PEM fuel cell developers by request and DOE Approval. The objectives are to: (1) Support technically, as directed by DOE, fuel cell component and system developers; (2) Assess fuel cell materials and components and give feedback to developers; (3) Assist the DOE Durability Working Group with the development of various new material durability Testing protocols; and (4) Provide support to the U.S. Council for Automotive Research (USCAR) and the USCAR/DOE Fuel Cell Technology Team. FY2012 specific technical objectives are: (1) Evaluate novel MPL materials; (2) Develop of startup/ shutdown protocol; (3) Test the impact of hydrophobic treatment on graphite bi-polar plates; (4) Perform complete diagnostics on metal bi-polar plates for corrosion; and (5) Participate and lead efforts in the DOE Working Groups.

  16. State Energy Advisory Board February 2011 Meeting | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    February 2011 Meeting State Energy Advisory Board February 2011 Meeting The minutes, presentations, and other materials from this meeting of STEAB. PDF icon Meeting Minutes -- February 2011 PDF icon EETD Special Initiatives PDF icon Challenges in Alternative Energy Production PDF icon Benchmarking ESCO Projects in Public Sector Markets PDF icon EETD Overview PDF icon Hawaii: A Model for Clean Energy Innovation PDF icon Technical Assistance to State and Local Governments PDF icon Demand Response

  17. Secretary Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Community

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    College Commencement | Department of Energy Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement Secretary Chu's Remarks at the Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement June 18, 2009 - 12:00am Addthis Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Commencement Address Secretary Steven Chu Thursday, June 18, 2009 President Henderson, members of the Board of Trustees, faculty, family, friends, and, especially the new graduates, I am very pleased to be your

  18. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice44c.ht

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Subject: Hanford Advisory Board Consensus Advice on FY 1998 Budget Planning Dear Mr. Wagoner: The Hanford Advisory Board has reviewed the preliminary DOE-RL Environmental Management budget planning for FY 1998. We appreciate your initiative and cooperation in making this budget data available for our review and comment. This review provides an opportunity for stakeholder input to the budget development process, which has not been available to us in previous years. This opportunity will greatly

  19. Montana State Land Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Land Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: Montana State Land Board Place: Helena, Montana Website: dnrc.mt.govLandBoardStaff.as References: Webpage1 This article is a stub....

  20. Advisory Board Makes Valuable Contributions to EM

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The eight local boards of the EM Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) provided 56 recommendations collectively in 2011, according to a recent assessment of board input into the EM program.

  1. Quality Assurance Corporate Board | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... from meeting held in Augusta, GA. November 13, 2008 QA Corporate Board Meeting - November 2008 Board minutes, agenda, and presentations from meeting held in Atlanta, Georgia. ...

  2. Upcoming Advisory Board Meetings | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Upcoming Advisory Board Meetings Upcoming Advisory Board Meetings January 26, 2016 - SEAB Meeting January 26, 2016 9:00AM to 12:00PM PST...

  3. China National CDM Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: China National CDM Board Place: Beijing Municipality, China Product: Regulator for CDM development in China. References: China National CDM...

  4. Cullman Power Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Cullman Power Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: Cullman Power Board Place: Alabama Phone Number: 256-734-2343 Website: cullmanpowerboard.com Twitter: @TheCullmanTimes...

  5. The Independent Technical Analysis Process

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Duberstein, Corey A.; Ham, Kenneth D.; Dauble, Dennis D.; Johnson, Gary E.

    2007-04-13

    The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) contracted with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to provide technical analytical support for system-wide fish passage information (BPA Project No. 2006-010-00). The goal of this project was to produce rigorous technical analysis products using independent analysts and anonymous peer reviewers. In the past, regional parties have interacted with a single entity, the Fish Passage Center to access the data, analyses, and coordination related to fish passage. This project provided an independent technical source for non-routine fish passage analyses while allowing routine support functions to be performed by other well-qualified entities.

  6. Hanford ETR- Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant- Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review- Estimate at Completion (Cost) Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a comprehensive review ofthe Hanford WTP estimate at completion - assessing the project scope, contract requirements, management execution plant, schedule, cost estimates, and risks.

  7. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Interim Report of the Task Force on Nuclear Nonproliferation August 1, 2014 U.S. Department of Energy 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 8 I. Setting Objectives and

  8. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Report of the Task Force on Technology Development for Environmental Management December 2014 U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Page Preface............................................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Technology Development for

  9. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    April 8-9, 2015 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD April 8-9, 2015 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Panel of Hanford Contractors

  10. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3-4, 2016 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD February 3-4, 2016 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program Reports

  11. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    March 6-7, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD March 6-7, 2014 Kennewick, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program

  12. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4-5, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 4-5, 2014 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Draft Advice: FY 2014 Lifecycle Cost and Schedule Report

  13. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4-5, 2015 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD February 4-5, 2015 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Draft Advice: Tank Farm Vapors

  14. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    June 6-7, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 6-7, 2013 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies-Program

  15. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    September 5-6, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 5-6, 2013 Kennewick, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies-Annual Reports

  16. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    September 4-5, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 4-5, 2014 Pasco, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program

  17. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5-6, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD November 5-6, 2014 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Annual Reports

  18. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    December 11-12, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD December 11-12, 2013 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program

  19. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10-11, 2015 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD June 10-11, 2015 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................ 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program Updates

  20. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    September 6-7, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 6-7, 2012 Kennewick, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Annual Reports

  1. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    February 7-8, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD February 7-8, 2013 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program

  2. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Follow Up Response from the Task Force on High Performance Computing November 30, 2014 On August 18, 2014, the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board approved the report from the Task Force on High Performance Computing, in response to the Secretary's December 20, 2013 charge. The report 1 delivered six recommendations: 1. DOE, through a program jointly established and managed by the NNSA and the Office of Science, should lead the program and investment to deliver

  3. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Report of the Task Force on Nuclear Nonproliferation March 31, 2015 U.S. Department of Energy 1 This page intentionally left blank Executive Summary The Secretary of Energy on December 20, 2013 established the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force on Nuclear Nonproliferation (TFNN) and charged it to "advise the DOE on future areas of emphasis for its nuclear nonproliferation activities by addressing the following questions: 1. What are the

  4. the-transportation-research-board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    January 22-26, 2012 The Transportation Research Board (TRB) 91st Annual Meeting will be held in Washington, D.C. at the Washington Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, and Washington Hilton hotels. The information-packed program will attract more than 11,000 transportation professionals from around the world to Washington, D.C., January 22-26, 2012. The Transportation Research and Analysis Computing Center (TRACC) team will showcase current projects at the upcoming Transportation Research Board

  5. Los Alamos National Laboratory board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    board renews plan for education, economic development, charitable giving September 18, 2013 $3.1 million approved for 2014 LOS ALAMOS, N.M., Sept. 18, 2013-The Los Alamos National Security, LLC Board of Governors last week approved a $3.1 million extension to the company's plan supporting education, economic development and charitable giving in Northern New Mexico. "We've tailored our programs very carefully to leverage dollars for the maximum benefit to the community," said Lab

  6. 2013-2015 Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Members | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    3-2015 Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Members 2013-2015 Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Members 2013-2015 Advisory Board Chair and Vice Chair John Deutch MIT Chemist, Former Under Secretary of Energy John M. Deutch is an Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mr. Deutch has been a member of the MIT faculty since 1970, and has served as Chairman of the Department of Chemistry, Dean of Science and Provost. Mr. Deutch has published over 140 technical publications

  7. Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP) | Department of Energy DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP) Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP) This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management

  8. Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Review | Department of Energy Facility Independent Technical Review Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download PDF icon Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility Independent Technical Review PDF icon Summary - Salt Waste Processing Facility Design at the Savannah River Site More Documents & Publications Savannah River Site - Salt Waste Processing Facility: Briefing on the Salt

  9. Technical Sessions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Technical Sessions S. F. lacobellis R.C.J. Somerville Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0224 Comparis,on of Cumulus Parameterizations For the present study, the Arakawa-Schubert (AS) cumu- lus parameterization has been incorporated. Thus the model can be run with either the Kuo or the AS parameter- ization. This version of the AS parameterization includes the effects of downdrafts as discussed by Kao and Ogura (1987) and Ogura and Kao

  10. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hanford Advisory Board Subject: Board Diversity Effectiveness March 7, 2014 2014O-03 Page 1 March 7, 2014 David Huizenga Senior Advisory for Environmental Management EM-1/Forestal Building U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue Washington, D.C. 20585 Re: Hanford Advisory Board Diversity and Effectiveness Dear Mr. Huizenga, The Hanford Advisory Board (Board) has taken the challenge of examining itself and increasing Board effectiveness. The Board considers itself (as does the public

  11. FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE MEETING

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8, 2011 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE MEETING June 8, 2011 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Welcome and Introductions .......................................................................................................................... 1 Integrated Vegetation Management Environmental Assessment Briefing ................................................... 2 CERCLA 5-Year Review

  12. FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE MEETING

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    August 10, 2011 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE MEETING August 10, 2011 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Welcome & Introductions ............................................................................................................... 1 CERCLA Five-Year Review .......................................................................................................... 2 Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management

  13. 2008 annual merit review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    None, None

    2009-01-18

    The 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review was held February 25-28, 2008 in Bethesda, Maryland. The review encompassed all of the work done by the Vehicle Technologies Program: a total of 280 individual activities were reviewed, by a total of just over 100 reviewers. A total of 1,908 individual review responses were received for the technical reviews, and an additional 29 individual review responses were received for the plenary session review.

  14. Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2015: Fuel Economy Information Project- Research, Data Validation, and Technical Assistance Related to Collecting, Analyzing, and Disseminating Accurate Fuel Economy Information

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about fuel economy...

  15. Technical information

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    level, as well as the State level, in several EIA reports, including the State Energy Data Report (SEDR) and the Monthly Energy Review (MER). When the CBECS totals are...

  16. Quality Assurance Corporate Board | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Quality Assurance » Quality Assurance Corporate Board Quality Assurance Corporate Board The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance Corporate Board is an executive board that includes both senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor representatives who are involved with construction, operating, and decommissioning projects. The Board acts in an advisory capacity to the EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Safety and Security Program, who is the Chief Executive

  17. Technical Standards Style Guide

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Style Guide for the Preparation of DOE Technical Standards (Standards, Handbooks, and Technical Standards Lists) May 13, 2015

  18. Technical Agenda

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Day 3 Technical Agenda September 10 - Wednesday 08:30-09:00 Uncertainty analysis D-A. Becker (GRS) Special Topics 09:00-9:30 HM-modeling and two-phase flow R. Wolters (TUCl) J. Rutquist (LBNL) 9:30-10:00 P&T in the context of waste management W. Bollingerfehr (DBE TEC) J. Mönig (GRS) 10:00-10:30 Report on discussion results of the hydrology group (separate micromeeting) J. Wolf (GRS) K. Kuhlman (SNL) 10:30-10:45 Break 10:45-11:15 NEA-Salt Club update J. Mönig, Chairman (GRS) 11:15-12:00

  19. TECHNICAL REPORT

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    TECHNICAL REPORT September 1 through November 30, 1994 Project Title: MANUFACTURE OF AMMONIUM SULFATE FERTILIZER FROM FGD-GYPSUM ICCI Project Number: Principal Investigator: Other Investigators: Project Manager; DOE Cooperative Agreement Number: DE-FC22-92PC9252 1 (Year 3) 94-1/3.1B-3M M.4.M. Chou, Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) M. Rostam-Abadi and J.M. Lytle, ISGS R. Hoeft, University of Illinois; EZ. Blevins, Allied Signal-Chemicals; F. Achron, Southeast Marketing Chemical Process

  20. TECHNICAL NOTE

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    TECHNICAL NOTE Broadband extreme-ultraviolet survey spectrometer for short-time-scale experiments B. E. Chapman, D. J. Den Hartog, and R. J. Fonck A fast and inexpensive spectrometer system has been developed to record extreme-UV impurity spectra in a magnetic-fusion-research device. To simplify the vacuum system, light is passed out of the spectrom- eter's vacuum to the detector with a sodium-salicylate-coated, fiber-optic coupler. This coupler is positioned so that the focal field is nearly

  1. Enterprise Assessments Review, West Valley Demonstration Project – December 2014

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness

  2. Cover letter, 10/29/03, re Nuclear Safety Technical Position, Deliverable 4.2.1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The enclosed Nuclear Safety Technical Position is Deliverable 4.2.1. under the Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilitises Board (DNFSB) Recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for Design...

  3. Technical Assessment of Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tank Systems for Automotive Applications

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This technical report describes DOE's assessment of the performance and cost of compressed hydrogen storage tank systems for automotive applications. The on-board performance (by Argonne National Lab)

  4. Technical Assessment of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tank Systems for Automotive Applications

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    Technical report describing DOE's second assessment report on a third generation (Gen3) system capable of storing hydrogen at cryogenic temperatures within a pressure vessel on-board a vehicle. The re

  5. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice84b.ht

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    The Honorable Federico Peña Secretary of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20585 Subject: FY2000 Budget Dear Secretary Peña: The Hanford Advisory Board has reviewed the DOE-Richland draft FY2000 budget and provides the following advice for your consideration. For the past four years, the Hanford Advisory Board has conducted reviews of DOE 's proposed budgets for Hanford cleanup. The advice from the Board has been the primary driver for significant cost

  6. Review of state-of-the-art of solar collector corrosion processes. Task 1 of solar collector studies for solar heating and cooling applications. Final technical progress report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clifford, J E; Diegle, R B

    1980-04-11

    The state-of-the-art of solar collector corrosion processes is reviewed, and Task 1 of a current research program on use of aqueous heat transfer fluids for solar heating and cooling is summarized. The review of available published literature has indicated that lack of quantitative information exists relative to collector corrosion at the present time, particularly for the higher temperature applications of solar heating and cooling compared to domestic water heating. Solar collector systems are reviewed from the corrosion/service life viewpoint, with emphasis on various applications, collector design, heat transfer fluids, and freeze protection methods. Available information (mostly qualitative) on collector corrosion technology is reviewed to indicate potential corrosion problem areas and corrosion prevention practices. Sources of limited quantitative data that are reviewed are current solar applications, research programs on collector corrosion, and pertinent experience in related applications of automotive cooling and non-solar heating and cooling. A data bank was developed to catalog corrosion information. Appendix A of this report is a bibliography of the data bank, with abstracts reproduced from presently available literature accessions (about 220). This report is presented as a descriptive summary of information that is contained in the data bank.

  7. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force Report on FracFocus 2.0 March 28, 2014 U.S. Department of Energy 2 Executive Summary This report presents the findings and recommendations for the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force on FracFocus. This Task Force report builds upon and extends the 2011 SEAB Subcommittee report on the environmental impacts of unconventional gas production. The Task Force believes that the FracFocus experience to date demonstrates the ease of

  8. Nevada Site Specific Advisory Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Specific Advisory Board Table of Contents Full Board Meeting Handouts for Wednesday, February 18, 2015 Please note: For your convenience, this Table of Contents has a link to the first page of each handout. If you just want to print certain pages, the directions are: file, print, Pages to Print, choose the radio button-Pages and enter just the pages that you want printed, then choose print Page 2 Map of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and the (8) Environmental Management Site Specific

  9. Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-01-01

    This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

  10. Electronic Status Board

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    2004-06-02

    This software was developed to post real-time process status and building conditions to operators, system engineers, system managers, and all support personnel. Data input is via operator console, strategically located throughout the facility, or by electronic rounds tablet. The system requires a person to log in with a unique user id and password to edit data. Viewing system status does not require log in and can be done from any desktop location running FileMaker. Oncemore » logged into the system, all new records saved are stamped with date, time and user name, and a historical copy is created that can be brought up to review status. There is no limitation to the amount of records that can be saved in the historical databases. The system will flag all out of limit conditions on the screen and enter that record on a turnover summery page which displays only flagged items. System conditions are displayed on a plasma display which scrolls through the various system condition screens. The system also shows floor plans that reflect specific building radiological conditions which aides in pre job briefings to show all hazards to personnel entering specific locations. The input screen is displayed on a second standard computer monitor connected to the input PC. There are several popup screens that require user intervention to ensure that the user wants to edit the data, is editing the appropriate sytem, and if they want to continue to stay logged into the system. Each workstation is connected to a Uninterrupted Power Supply which will shut each system down safely in a power failure. The server is configured to print out current status upon notification from the UPS that power has failed. The system also has a video input card which is connected to a DVD/VCR which shows safety meetings, and images taken from a digital camera used to show specific locations/items for pre-job briefings.« less

  11. Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Support - 2014 BTO Peer Review | Department of Energy Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical Support - 2014 BTO Peer Review Project Impact Assessments: Building America FY14 Field Test Technical Support - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Lieko Earle, National Renewable Energy Laboratory The goal of this project is for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to provide extensive, hands-on technical support to Building America teams in the areas of experiment

  12. Network Requirements Reviews

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Reviews Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site

  13. DOE State Energy Advisory Board

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    State Energy Advisory Board August 12, 2008 Lakewood, Colorado * Energy Markets and Infrastructure Planning & Assessment * Energy - "Environment" (including air, water, food vs. fuel, sustainabilty issues) Integration * Policy and Program Design * Economic Development, Innovation & Workforce Scale-up * Public Awareness and Support * Transition Planning * Other Topics? Acceleration of State Energy Transformation Possible Topics for Discussion Questions and Comments For Each

  14. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Page 1 Final Meeting Summary September 9-10, 2015 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD September 9-10, 2015 Pasco, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 2 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program

  15. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4-5, 2015 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD November 4-5, 2015 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation Hanford Site-Wide Risk

  16. Hanford Advisory Board Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Page 1 Final Meeting Summary November 1-2, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD November 1-2, 2012 Richland, WA Topics in This Meeting Summary Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome, Introductions, and Announcements ............................................................................................. 3 Tri-Party Agreement Agencies - Program

  17. Materials Capability Review Los Alamos National Laboratory May 4-7, 2009

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Taylor, Antoniette J

    2009-01-01

    Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) uses external peer review to measure and continuously improve the quality of its science, technology and engineering (STE). LANL uses capability reviews to assess the STE quality and institutional integration and to advise Laboratory Management on the current and future health of the STE. Capability reviews address the STE integration that LANL uses to meet mission requirements. STE capabilities are define to cut across directorates providing a more holistic view of the STE quality, integration to achieve mission requirements, and mission relevance. The scope of these capabilities necessitate that there will be significant overlap in technical areas covered by capability reviews (e.g ., materials research and weapons science and engineering). In addition, LANL staff may be reviewed in different capability reviews because of their varied assignments and expertise. LANL plans to perform a complete review of the Laboratory's STE capabilities (hence staff) in a three-year cycle. The principal product of an external review is a report that includes the review committee's assessments, commendations, and recommendations for STE. The Capability Review Committees serve a dual role of providing assessment of the Laboratory's technical contributions and integration towards its missions and providing advice to Laboratory Management. The assessments and advice are documented in reports prepared by the Capability Review Committees that are delivered to the Director and to the Principal Associate Director for Science, Technology and Engineering (PADSTE). This report will be used by Laboratory Management for STE assessment and planning. The report is also provided to the Department of Energy (DOE) as part of LANL's Annual Performance Plan and to the Los Alamos National Security (LANS) LLC's Science and Technology Committee (STC) as part of its responsibilities to the LANS Board of Governors. LANL has defined fourteen STE capabilities. Table 1 lists the five STE capabilities that LANL Management (Director, PADSTE, technical Associate Directors) have identified for review in Fiscal Year (FY) 2009.

  18. CRAD, New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    December 2, 2014 New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical Safety Requirements Criteria Review and Approach Document (EA CRAD 31-07, Rev. 0) CRAD, New Nuclear...

  19. Technical Assessment: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage for Vehicular...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage: Performance and Cost Review Technical Assessment of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tank Systems for Automotive Applications High-Pressure Tube ...

  20. Alabama Oil and Gas Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oil and Gas Board Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Alabama Oil and Gas Board Name: Alabama Oil and Gas Board Abbreviation: OGB Address: 420 Hackberry Lane Place: Tuscaloosa,...

  1. PP-226 Brownsville public Utilities Board | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    6 Brownsville public Utilities Board PP-226 Brownsville public Utilities Board Presidential permit authorizing Brownsville public Utilities Board to construct, operate, and ...

  2. Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners Strategic Plan | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Reference LibraryAdd to library Land Use Plan: Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners Strategic Plan Abstract The Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners (State Land Board)...

  3. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2009 Santa Fe | Department of...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    - September 30, 2009 More Documents & Publications NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2009 Santa Fe NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2009 Santa Fe NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2009 Santa...

  4. Sylacauga Utilities Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sylacauga Utilities Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: Sylacauga Utilities Board Place: Alabama Phone Number: (256) 249-8501 or (256) 249-0372 Website: www.sylacauga.net...

  5. Foley Board of Utilities | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Foley Board of Utilities Jump to: navigation, search Name: Foley Board of Utilities Place: Alabama Phone Number: Foley: 251-943-5001 or Daphne: 251-626-5000 Website:...

  6. Newberry Water & Light Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Water & Light Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: Newberry Water & Light Board Place: Michigan Phone Number: (906) 293-5681 Outage Hotline: (906) 293-5681 References: EIA Form...

  7. Insulation board and process of making

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Nowobilski, Jeffert J.; Owens, William J.

    1985-01-01

    Insulation board capable of bearing a load without significant loss of insulating capacity due to compression, produced by a method wherein the board is made in compliance with specified conditions of time, temperature and pressure.

  8. Advisory Board Seats New Student Representatives

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB) welcomed two new student representatives at its May meeting. Gracie Hall and Julia Riley will serve on the board through April 2014.

  9. Environmental Management Advisory Board Charter | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Services Communication & Engagement EMAB Environmental Management Advisory Board ... Communication & Engagement Intergovernmental Programs EMAB EM SSAB Tribal Programs ...

  10. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2008 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 24, 2008 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Consideration and Action on Recommendations

  11. NNMCAB Board Minutes: June 2000 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the June 28, 2000 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation LANL, Procurement Process, Betty Romero

  12. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2001 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 24, 2001 Board meeting at St. Vincent's Presentation LANL, Groundwater Update, Mat Johansen

  13. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2001 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 206, 2001 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation, How Communication is Disseminated to the Public

  14. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2002 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 30, 2002 Board Retreat at Kachina Lodge Presentation DOE, EM SSAB Charter Renewal, Martha Crosland

  15. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2001 Jemez Pueblo

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 30, 2001 Board meeting at Walatowa Visitor's Center Presentation DOE, Environmental Restoration, Ted Taylor

  16. NNMCAB Board Minutes: February 2001 Espanola

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the February 28, 2001 Board meeting at Northern New Mexico Community College Presentation NMED, Permit Update, James Bearzi

  17. NNMCAB Board Minutes: June 2001 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the June 20, 2001 Board meeting at Hotel Santa Fe Presentation NNMCAB Waste Management Committee

  18. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2003 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 28, 2003 Board Meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation Environmental Risk Assessment, John Till

  19. New Student Liaison Gets on Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    February 10, 2014 New Student Liaison Gets on Board The Nevada Site Specific Advisory Board recently welcomed new student liaison Matty Hodapp to the Board. A junior at the Meadows School in Las Vegas, Hodapp will work with the Board to design an appealing, effective resource for educating high school students about the important Environmental Management work at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). This educational resource-which can take the form of a brochure, app, video, presentation,

  20. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2011 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 28, 2011 Board meeting at Sagebrush Inn Conference Center Presentation DOE, Long Term Stewardship, Tom Longo

  1. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2010 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 17, 2010 Board meeting at Lodge at Santa Fe Presentation LANL, Environmental Surveillance Report for 2009

  2. NNMCAB Board Minutes: December 2000 White Rock

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the December 13, 2000 Board meeting at Town Hall Presentation LANL, Air Quality Audit, John Till

  3. NNMCAB Board Agenda: November 2014 Ohkay Owingeh

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Agenda for the November 19, 2014 Board meeting at Ohkay Conference Center Presentation CDBF, WIPP Recovery Plan, J. R. Stroble

  4. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2008 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 30, 2008 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation LANL, Upcoming Consent Order Deliverables

  5. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2003 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 30, 2003 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation DOE, Risk Communications Principles, Ted Taylor

  6. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD (EM SSAB) HANFORD Application No. (Please leave blank) MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION (December 2015)...

  7. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2006 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 25, 2006 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation LANL, Groundwater Issues

  8. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2008 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 19, 2008 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation LANL, Environmental Surveillance Report

  9. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2002 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 20, 2002 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Planning for SSAB Chairs Workshop on Transuranic Waste

  10. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2006 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 27, 2006 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation LANL, Transuranic Waste Program, Lee Lucero

  11. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2003 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 19, 2003 Board meeting at Courtyard by Marriott Presentation LANL, Risk Based End State, David Gregory

  12. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Meetings

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lists links to the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Meetings. The links provide meeting documents available for download.

  13. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Contacts

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lists Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board contact information including mailing address, phone numbers, and contact email addresses.

  14. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2009 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 29, 2009 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Q&A With New Mexico Environment Department

  15. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2008 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 22, 2008 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation San Ildefonso, Tribal Risk Assessment, Raymond Martinez

  16. Fuel Cell Technical Publications | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Information Resources Technical Publications Fuel Cell Technical Publications Fuel Cell Technical Publications Technical information about fuel cells published in technical ...

  17. Improvements to Technical Specifications surveillance requirements

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lobel, R.; Tjader, T.R.

    1992-12-01

    In August 1983 an NRC task group was formed to investigate problems with surveillance testing required by Technical Specifications, and to recommend approaches to effect improvements. NUREG-1024 ( Technical Specifications-Enhancing Safety Impact'') resulted, and it contained recommendations to review the basis for test frequencies; to ensure that the tests promote safety and do not degrade equipment; and to review surveillance tests so that they do not unnecessarily burden personnel. The Technical Specifications Improvement Program (TSIP) was established in December 1984 to provide the framework for rewriting and improving the Technical Specifications. As an element of the TSIP, all Technical Specifications surveillance requirements were comprehensively examined as recommended in NUREG-1024. The results of that effort are presented in this report. The study found that while some testing at power is essential to verify equipment and system operability, safety can be improved, equipment degradation decreased, and unnecessary personnel burden relaxed by reducing the amount of testing at power.

  18. Two stage fluid bed-plasma gasification process for solid waste valorisation: Technical review and preliminary thermodynamic modelling of sulphur emissions

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Morrin, Shane; Lettieri, Paola; Chapman, Chris; Mazzei, Luca

    2012-04-15

    Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We investigate sulphur during MSW gasification within a fluid bed-plasma process. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We review the literature on the feed, sulphur and process principles therein. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer The need for research in this area was identified. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer We perform thermodynamic modelling of the fluid bed stage. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Initial findings indicate the prominence of solid phase sulphur. - Abstract: Gasification of solid waste for energy has significant potential given an abundant feed supply and strong policy drivers. Nonetheless, significant ambiguities in the knowledge base are apparent. Consequently this study investigates sulphur mechanisms within a novel two stage fluid bed-plasma gasification process. This paper includes a detailed review of gasification and plasma fundamentals in relation to the specific process, along with insight on MSW based feedstock properties and sulphur pollutant therein. As a first step to understanding sulphur partitioning and speciation within the process, thermodynamic modelling of the fluid bed stage has been performed. Preliminary findings, supported by plant experience, indicate the prominence of solid phase sulphur species (as opposed to H{sub 2}S) - Na and K based species in particular. Work is underway to further investigate and validate this.

  19. 2013 Peer Review Agenda | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Agenda 2013 Peer Review Agenda Agenda for the 2013 Peer Review meeting on April 22-25, ... Agenda State Energy Advisory Board April 2015 Meeting Response to several FOIA requests ...

  20. NIF User Group Executive Board

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NIF User Group Executive Board Professor Don Lamb (Chair) University of Chicago Dr. Riccardo Betti University of Rochester Dr. Alexis Casner Centre d'Études de Bruyère Le Châtel Professor Paul Drake Co-Chair Committee Elections University of Michigan Dr. Hans Hermann Los Alamos National Laboratory Dr. Paul Neumayer GSI Darmstadt Dr. Hye-Sook Park Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dr. Mingsheng Wei General Atomics Jena Meineche Young Researcher: Oxford University Gianluca Gregori Oxford

  1. Requirements Review Reports

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Requirements Review Reports Case Studies News & Publications ESnet News Publications and Presentations Galleries ESnet Awards and Honors Blog ESnet Live Home » Science Engagement » Science Requirements Reviews » Requirements Review Reports Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside US) 1

  2. Microsoft PowerPoint - 2012 Hanford Advisory Board Membership Package Status-nwB.pptx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Membership Package Status 2012 2012 Hanford Ad i Advisory Board Board Membership Package Status Status 1 2012 Hanford Advisory Board Membership Package Status 2012 HAB M b hi 2012 HAB Membership Package Overview Submitted to DOE-HQ on January 24 18 primary member nominations 16 i ti b (2 t "i t i - 16 existing members (2 were recent "interim appointments - 2 new nominations 24 alternate member nominations - 18 existing members 6 new nominations - 6 new nominations HQ review underway

  3. The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force on Next Generation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    High Performance Computing | Department of Energy Next Generation High Performance Computing The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force on Next Generation High Performance Computing The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force on Next Generation High Performance Computing is composed of SEAB members and independent experts charged with reviewing the mission and national capabilities related to next generation high performance computing. The Task Force will examine

  4. On-board Measurement of NO and NO2 using Non-dispersive Ultraviolet (NDUV)

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Spectroscopy | Department of Energy Analyzer allows simultaneous and separate measurement of NO and NO2 for on-road and non-raod applications PDF icon p-11_ensfield.pdf More Documents & Publications On-Board Measurement of Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Using Feedback Absorption Laser Spectroscopy Combined with Amplified Resonance and Low Pressure Sampling Study of On-Board Ammonia (NH3) Generation for SCR Operation 2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Acronyms

  5. SUBJECT: Guidance on Retention of Facility Representative Technical Competence during Reductions in Force, 4/21/1998

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department’s Revised Implementation Plan (IP) for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-3 renews the Department’s commitment to maintaining the technical capability necessary to safely manage and operate defense nuclear facilities.

  6. Technical Report - FINAL

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Barbara Luke, Director, UNLV Engineering Geophysics Laboratory

    2007-04-25

    Improve understanding of the earthquake hazard in the Las Vegas Valley and to assess the state of preparedness of the area's population and structures for the next big earthquake. 1. Enhance the seismic monitoring network in the Las Vegas Valley 2. Improve understanding of deep basin structure through active-source seismic refraction and reflection testing 3. Improve understanding of dynamic response of shallow sediments through seismic testing and correlations with lithology 4. Develop credible earthquake scenarios by laboratory and field studies, literature review and analyses 5. Refine ground motion expectations around the Las Vegas Valley through simulations 6. Assess current building standards in light of improved understanding of hazards 7. Perform risk assessment for structures and infrastructures, with emphasis on lifelines and critical structures 8. Encourage and facilitate broad and open technical interchange regarding earthquake safety in southern Nevada and efforts to inform citizens of earthquake hazards and mitigation opportunities

  7. Technical Consultant Report Template

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Technical Consultant Report Template, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

  8. Technical Consultant Contract

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Technical Consultant Contract, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

  9. Hydrogen Station Compression, Storage, and Dispensing Technical Status and

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Costs: Systems Integration (Technical Report) | SciTech Connect Technical Report: Hydrogen Station Compression, Storage, and Dispensing Technical Status and Costs: Systems Integration Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Hydrogen Station Compression, Storage, and Dispensing Technical Status and Costs: Systems Integration At the request of the U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO), the National Renewable Energy Laboratory commissioned an independent review of

  10. Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment Two technical roadmaps for leading geothermal technology sectors are open for review by the geothermal community and posted below for your feedback. Exploration Technical Roadmap A Roadmap for Strategic Development of Geothermal Exploration Technologies Characterizing productive geothermal systems is challenging yet critical to identify and develop an estimated 30 gigawatts electric (GWe) of undiscovered hydrothermal

  11. US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap US DRIVE Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap The Fuel Cell Technical Team (FCTT) conducts the following activities: (1) Reviews and evaluates materials and systems research regarding fuel cells for light-duty vehicles and provides feedback to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Partnership stakeholders, (2) Generates goals and performance targets for fuel cells for automotive applications, (3) Collaborates with other technical teams and assists the Partnership

  12. Technical Standards Newsletter - April 2002 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment Two technical roadmaps for leading geothermal technology sectors are open for review by the geothermal community and posted below for your feedback. Exploration Technical Roadmap A Roadmap for Strategic Development of Geothermal Exploration Technologies Characterizing productive geothermal systems is challenging yet critical to identify and develop an estimated 30 gigawatts electric (GWe) of undiscovered hydrothermal

  13. A technical review of non-destructive assay research for the characterization of spent nuclear fuel assemblies being conducted under the US DOE NGSI

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Croft, Stephen; Tobin, Stephen J

    2010-12-06

    There is a growing belief that expansion of nuclear energy generation will be needed in the coming decades as part of a mixed supply chain to meet global energy demand. At stake is the health of the economic engine that delivers human prosperity. As a consequence renewed interest is being paid to the safe management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and the plutonium it contains. In addition to being an economically valuable resource because it can be used to construct explosive devices, Pu must be placed on an inventory and handled securely. A multiinstitutional team of diverse specialists has been assembled under a project funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI) to address ways to nondestructively quantify the plutonium content of spent nuclear fuel assemblies, and to also detect the potential diversion of pins from those assemblies. Studies are underway using mostly Monte Carlo tools to assess the feasibility, individual and collective performance capability of some fourteen nondestructive assay methods. Some of the methods are familiar but are being applied in a new way against a challenging target which is being represented with a higher degree of realism in simulation space than has been done before, while other methods are novel. In this work we provide a brief review of the techniques being studied and highlight the main achievements to date. We also draw attention to the deficiencies identified in for example modeling capability and available basic nuclear data. We conclude that this is an exciting time to be working in the NDA field and that much work, both fundamental and applied, remains ahead if we are to advance the state of the practice to meet the challenges posed to domestic and international safeguards by the expansion of nuclear energy together with the emergence of alternative fuel cycles.

  14. DOE/Advisory Board Recognize Service of Student Representatives |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    04-2014, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) DOE-STD-1104-2014, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) March 2, 2015 DOE-STD-1104-2014, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) This document addresses frequently asked questions (FAQs) for DOE Technical Standard DOE-STD-1104-2014, Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Document. These questions range from a review of the major changes and addresses other commonly asked questions during roll-out training. PDF icon

  15. Status Report: EM Acquisition and Project Management Review

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Report: Acquisition and Project Management Review August 15, 2006 Submitted by: Mr. James Ajello and Mr. Dennis Ferrigno Background: The Environmental Management Advisory Board is ...

  16. State Energy Advisory Board | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Initiatives & Projects » State Energy Advisory Board State Energy Advisory Board What is STEAB? The State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB) develops recommendations for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Congress regarding initiation, design, implementation, and evaluation of federal energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. In doing so, STEAB serves to integrate and provide consistency between federal, state and local activities. STEAB subscribes to the concept of sustainable

  17. State Energy Advisory Board | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy 7 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory Board 2007 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2007 for the State Energy Advisory Board. PDF icon November 28, 2007 PDF icon September 19, 2007 PDF icon July 18, 2007 PDF icon June 20, 2007 PDF icon May 23, 2007 PDF icon May 4, 2007 PDF icon February 15, 2007 PDF icon January 18, 2007 More Documents & Publications State Energy Advisory Board 2008 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory

  18. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Washington, D.C. 20585 April 25, 2013 2 Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board - April 25, 2013 Meeting Minutes LIST OF ACRONYMS AB - Advisory Board ANL - Argonne National Laboratory ARP - Accelerator Retrieval Project BNL - Brookhaven National Laboratory BRC - Blue Ribbon Commission CAB - Citizens Advisory Board D&D - Decontamination & Decommissioning DDFO - Deputy Designated Federal Officer DOE - Department of Energy DUF6 - Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride DWPF - Defense

  19. NNMCAB Board Agenda: September 2015 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Agenda for the September 30, 2015 Board Meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation San I, Environmental and Cultural Perspectives of the Pueblo

  20. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2016 Ohkay Owingeh

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 27, 2016 Board Meeting at Ohkay Owingeh Conference Center Presentation, DOE, Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office Budget, Jenna Hackett

  1. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2002 Los Alamos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the March 27, 2002 Board meeting at Los Alamos Site Operations Presentation LANL, Overlook of Ecological Risk Assessment, Rich Mirenda

  2. NNMCAB Board Minutes: April 2000 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the April 26, 2000 Board meeting at Hotel Loretto Presentation DOE, Los Alamos National Laboratory Environmental Restoration, Ted Taylor

  3. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2001 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 25, 2001 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Consideration and Action on ArrowPaK Recommendation

  4. Guntersville Electric Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Board Place: Alabama Phone Number: (256) 582-5691 Website: www.guntersvilleelectric.comh Facebook: https:www.facebook.comsearch112844022062743places-in139386576124160...

  5. Springfield Utility Board- Energy Savings Plan Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Springfield Utility Board provides industrial customers with a comprehensive report to identify cost effective efficiency improvements. Eligible measures include high efficiency motors,...

  6. NNMCAB Board Minutes: Novmeber 2000 San Ildefonso

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 15, 2000 Board Meeting at San Ildefonso Pueblo Presentation CDC, ChimRisk Control Project on Historical Records, Tom Weidner

  7. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2012 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 25, 2012 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation DOE, NEPA for Los Conchas Fire, Lee Bishop

  8. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2010 Los Alamos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 28, 2010 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation LANL, Material Disposal Area T Background and Status Update

  9. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2011 Espanola

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 112, 2011 Board meeting at the Santa Claran Presentation LANL, Basics of Radiation, Mike McNaughton

  10. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2011 Los Alamos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 27, 2011 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation LANL, Los Conchas Fire, Dave McInroy Presentation DOE, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, John Heaton

  11. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2011 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 26, 2011 Board meeting at Homewood Suites Presentation LANL, Corrective Measures Evaluations at MDA-G and MDA-H, Jarrett Rice, Pat Nakagawa

  12. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2005 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 28, 2005 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation Risk Assessment Corporation, Risk Assessments, Helen Grogan Consideration and Action on Recommendations

  13. NNMCAB Board Agenda: March 2015 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Agenda for the March 25, 2015 Board meeting at La Fonda Presentation DOE, Update to DOE Stakeholders on FY'2017 EM Budget Planning Integration, Pete Maggiore

  14. Springfield Utility Board- Commercial Lighting Incentive

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Springfield Utility Board (SUB) offers rebates for a wide range of commercial and industrial lighting retrofits and new construction.

  15. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2003 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 17, 2003 Board meeting at Sagebrush Inn Conference Center Presentation LANL, 2002 Environmental Surveillance Report, Lars Soholt

  16. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2004 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the March 31, 2004 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation NMED, Mission of the Hazardous Waste Bureau, Sandra Martin

  17. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2004 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 26, 2004 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2004-01 "Reinstate High Performance Teams"

  18. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2004 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 22, 2004 Board meeting at Sagebrush Inn Conference Center Presentation DOE, Report on the NNMCAB, Ed Wilmot

  19. Sounding Board V.1.0

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    2006-10-10

    Sounding Board allows users to query multiple models simultaneously, finding relevant experts, related terms, and historical text related to one's query.

  20. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2005 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January19, 2005 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation LANL, History and Overview of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

  1. Report to the Environmental Management Advisory Board

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Report to the Environmental Management Advisory Board Evaluation of the United States Department of Energy Environmental Management Strategic Planning Communication Tool Submitted ...

  2. NNMCAB Board Minutes: April 2009 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the April 8, 2009 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation Kerr Laboratory, Well Screen Analysis Report, Steven Acree, Richard Wilkin

  3. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2000 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 24, 2000 Board meeting at NM Energy Minerals and Natural Resources Department Presentation LANL, Environmental Safety and Health, Lee McAtee

  4. NNMCAB Board Minutes: October 2000 Espanola

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the October 25, 2000 Board meeting at Johnsons Controls Building Presentation LANL, Tritium in Los Alamos Groundwater Well, Mat Johansen

  5. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2006 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 26, 2006 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2006-05 and 2006-07

  6. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2004 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 17, 2004 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation LANL, TRU Waste Management Program at LANL, John Ordaz

  7. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Expedite Milestones C. Recommendation on DOE Oak Ridge GIS Fact Sheets (C. Staley) D. Election of FY 2015 Board Officers (B. Price) VII. Responses to Recommendations & Comments (D. ...

  8. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board SWPF - Salt Waste Processing Facility TRU - Transuranic Waste WCS - Waste Control Specialists WIPP - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant WTP ...

  9. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITE-SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - (DOE) Savannah River Site SRS CAB - Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board TWINS - ... System WIPP - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant WIR - Waste Incidental to Reprocessing ...

  10. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2007 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 19, 2007 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation DOE, Quarterly Performance Reports on Environmental Programs, George Rael

  11. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2008 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the March 26, 2008 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentations LANL, How Does LANL Conduce Risk Assessment, Rich Mirenda

  12. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2007 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 28, 2007 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Presentation LANL, LANL Responses to 17 National Academies of Sciences Recommendations Regarding Groundwater Monitoring, Huber

  13. High Level Waste Corporate Board Charter

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Board: * Deputy Assistant Secretary (DAS) for Engineering and Technology, EM-20 (Chair) * Director for the Office of Waste Processing, EM-21 (Deputy Chair and Executive Secretary)...

  14. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2001 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 28, 2001 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Presentation LANL, Cerro Grander Fire, McAtee Amendment to NNMCAB Bylaws

  15. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Committees

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Oak Ridge’s Site Specific Advisory Board uses its committee structure to achieve its mission and conduct many of its tasks.

  16. Full Board Meeting Information - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Project Interim Report Overview (CRESP presentation) Attachment 2: PFP Demolition Animation (CH2M Hill video) Attachment 3: Hanford Advisory Board Agency Update for the...

  17. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2004 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 29, 2004 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Consideration and Action on NNMCAB Bylaws Amendment No. 6

  18. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2006 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 20, 2006 Board meeting at Sagebrush Inn Conference Center Consideration and Action on EM SSAB Chairs Letters

  19. Environmental Management Advisory Board Members | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EMAB » Environmental Management Advisory Board Members Environmental Management Advisory Board Members EMAB membership reflects a diversity of views, demographics, expertise, and professional and academic experience. The following members comprise the current Board: Current Members Paul M. Dabbar EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Sherrell R. Greene EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Jane A. Hedges EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Carolyn L. Huntoon EMAB Board Member Read Bio ‣ Kimberlee Kearfott EMAB

  20. Technical Area 21

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Technical Area 21 Technical Area 21 Technical Area 21 was the site of chemical research for refining plutonium and plutonium metal production from 1945 to 1978. August 1, 2013 Technical Area 21 in 2011 Technical Area 21 in 2011 Technical Area 21 (TA-21), also known as DP Site was the site of chemical research for refining plutonium and plutonium metal production from 1945 to 1978. Between 2008 and 2011, MDAs B, U, and V were excavated and removed. 24 buildings were demolished in 2010 and 2011

  1. Hanford Advisory Board (HAB or Board) Membership Nomination and Appointment Process

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    March 1, 2012 Hanford Advisory Board (HAB or Board) Membership Nomination and Appointment Process Background In 1993 1 the Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) agencies - the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Washington State Department of Ecology - engaged in a collaborative and transparent public process to form an advisory board to address Hanford cleanup issues. An outcome of that process was the identification of an advisory board membership that

  2. Board on Research Data and Information

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sztein, A. Ester; Boright, John

    2015-08-14

    The Board on Research Data and Information (BRDI) has planned and undertaken numerous activities regarding data citation, attribution, management, policy, publishing, centers, access, curation, sharing, and infrastructure; and international collaboration and cooperation. Some of these activities resulted in National Research Council reports (For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards (2012), The Case for International Scientific Data Sharing: A Focus on Developing Countries (2012), and The Future of Scientific Knowledge Discovery in Open Networked Environments (2012); and a peer-reviewed paper (Out of Cite, Out of Mind: The Current State of Practice, Policy, and Technology for the Citation of Data, 2013). BRDI held symposia, workshops and sessions in the U.S. and abroad on diverse topics such as global scientific data infrastructures, discovery of data online, privacy in a big data world, and data citation principles, among other timely data-related subjects. In addition, BRDI effects the representation of the United States before the International Council for Science’s International Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA).

  3. Federal Technical Capability Manual

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2004-05-18

    Provides requirements and responsibilities to ensure recruitment and hiring of technically capable personnel to retain critical technical capabilities within the Department at all times. Cancels DOE M 426.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 426.1.

  4. Energy Planning Technical Assistance

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy project planning technical assistance is intended to assist Indian tribes and Alaska Native villages with early assessment, program design, and options analysis. Below is a list of the various options for this type of technical assistance.

  5. Technical Assessment Team Report

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Technical Assessment Team (TAT) is an independent team of technical experts that evaluated the mechanisms and chemical reactions contributing to the failure of a waste drum at the Waste...

  6. NASA technical baseline

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Twitter Google + Vimeo GovDelivery SlideShare SunShot Grand Challenge: Regional Test Centers NASA technical baseline HomeTag:NASA technical baseline Curiosity's multi-mission ...

  7. 2015 GTO Peer Review

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The annual Peer Review offers geothermal stakeholders an opportunity to learn about the projects funded by DOE across a wide spectrum of technical complexity and funding magnitude, from research...

  8. Apply for Technical Assistance

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Application form for U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy technical assistance for tribes.

  9. Insulation board and process of making

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Nowobilski, J.J.; Owens, W.J.

    1985-08-27

    Insulation board is described which is capable of bearing a load without significant loss of insulating capacity due to compression, produced by a method wherein the board is made in compliance with specified conditions of time, temperature and pressure. 2 figs.

  10. Processing A Printed Wiring Board By Single Bath Electrodeposition

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Meltzer, Michael P. (Oakland, CA); Steffani, Christopher P. (Livermore, CA); Gonfiotti, Ray A. (Livermore, CA)

    2003-04-15

    A method of processing a printed wiring board by single bath electrodeposition. Initial processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board. Copper is plated on the printed wiring board from a bath containing nickel and copper. Nickel is plated on the printed wiring board from the bath containing nickel and copper and final processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board.

  11. QA Corporate Board Meeting - October 2015 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    5 QA Corporate Board Meeting - October 2015 16th EM Quality Assurance Corporate Board Meeting Meeting Date: October 26, 2015 Meeting Location: VTC Documents Available for Download PDF icon Meeting Minutes More Documents & Publications QA Corporate Board Meeting - November 2012 QA Corporate Board Meeting - May 2012 QA Corporate Board Meeting - October 2014

  12. Processing a printed wiring board by single bath electrodeposition

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Meltzer, Michael P. (Oakland, CA); Steffani, Christopher P. (Livermore, CA); Gonfiotti, Ray A. (Livermore, CA)

    2010-12-07

    A method of processing a printed wiring board. Initial processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board. Copper is plated on the printed wiring board from a bath containing nickel and copper. Nickel is plated on the printed wiring board from a bath containing nickel and copper and final processing steps are implemented on the printed wiring board.

  13. Federal Technical Capability

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2009-11-19

    This directive defines requirements and responsibilities for meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) commitment to recruiting, deploying, developing, and retaining a technically competent workforce that will accomplish DOE missions in a safe and efficient manner through the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). Cancels DOE M 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual.

  14. Technical Standards Program

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-02-23

    The Order promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. Admin Chg 1 dated 3-12-13.

  15. Technical Standards Program

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1999-11-19

    The Technical Standards Program (TSP) promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards by the Department of Energy (DOE), provides DOE with the means to develop needed technical standards, and manages overall technical standards information, activities, issues, and interactions. Cancels DOE O 1300.2A. Canceled by DOE O 252.1A

  16. HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013 Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013 HEP Attendees 2013 FES Requirements Review 2014 BES Requirements Review 2014 Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1

  17. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Fax: (509) 942-1926 Hanford Advisory Board Subject: Appreciation June 5, 2014 2014O-04 Page 1 June 5, 2014 Matt McCormick, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations P.O. Box 550 (A7-75) Richland, WA 99352 Re: Appreciation Dear Matt, The Hanford Advisory Board (Board) sincerely wishes to thank you for your leadership over the past four years. Clearly we have benefitted from your commitment to a more open and transparent engagement with the Board. In particular, the Board appreciates

  18. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice62.htm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) Dear Mr. Wagoner: The Hanford Advisory Board is encouraged by the steps taken by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to achieve contract reform at the Hanford site through the new Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC). There has not been sufficient time to assess the effectiveness of the new PHMC contract to meet stakeholder and public expectations. Your letter dated December 3, 1996, indicates an integrated sitewide technical cost and schedule

  19. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice90.htm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Tom Fitzsimmons, Director Washington Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Subject: Tank Waste Treatment Contract, TPA Milestones, Financing and Funding Dear Messrs. Owendoff, Wagoner, and Fitzsimmons: The Hanford Advisory Board (HAB) submits the following advice relating to progress on the BNFL contract for the technical design of a tank waste treatment facility. The health, environmental, and economic consequences of a failure of the tank waste treatment and disposal

  20. INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE FOCUSED FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN FOR DESIGNATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS CONTRIBUTING TO THE SOUTHWEST GROUNDWATER PLUME AT THE PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Looney, B.; Eddy-Dilek, C.; Amidon, M.; Rossabi, J.; Stewart, L.

    2011-05-31

    The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently developing a Proposed Plan (PP) for remediation of designated sources of chlorinated solvents that contribute contamination to the Southwest (SW) Groundwater Plume at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), in Paducah, KY. The principal contaminants in the SW Plume are trichloroethene (TCE) and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs); these industrial solvents were used and disposed in various facilities and locations at PGDP. In the SW plume area, residual TCE sources are primarily in the fine-grained sediments of the Upper Continental Recharge System (UCRS), a partially saturated zone that delivers contaminants downward into the coarse-grained Regional Gravel Aquifer (RGA). The RGA serves as the significant lateral groundwater transport pathway for the plume. In the SW Plume area, the four main contributing TCE source units are: (1) Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 1 / Oil Landfarm; (2) C-720 Building TCE Northeast Spill Site (SWMU 211A); (3) C-720 Building TCE Southeast Spill Site (SWMU 211B); and (4) C-747 Contaminated Burial Yard (SWMU 4). The PP presents the Preferred Alternatives for remediation of VOCs in the UCRS at the Oil Landfarm and the C-720 Building spill sites. The basis for the PP is documented in a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) (DOE, 2011) and a Site Investigation Report (SI) (DOE, 2007). The SW plume is currently within the boundaries of PGDP (i.e., does not extend off-site). Nonetheless, reasonable mitigation of the multiple contaminant sources contributing to the SW plume is one of the necessary components identified in the PGDP End State Vision (DOE, 2005). Because of the importance of the proposed actions DOE assembled an Independent Technical Review (ITR) team to provide input and assistance in finalizing the PP.

  1. Water Science and Technology Board annual report 1987

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1988-01-01

    In 1982, the National Research Council chose to recognize the importance of water resource issues by establishing the Water Science and Technology Board (WSTB). During the five years since its first meeting in November 1982, the WSTB has grown and matured. The WSTB has met 14 times to provide guidance and plan activities. Under the WSTB's direction, committees of experts have conducted approximately 30 studies on a broad array of topics, from dam safety to irrigation-induced water quality problems to ground water protection strategies. Studies have ranged in scope from the oversight of specific agency projects and programs to broader scientific reviews, such as a disciplinary assessment of the hydrologic sciences initiated in 1987. In all cases, studies have the general theme of ultimately improving the scientific and technological bases of programs of water management and environmental quality. This fifth annual report of the WSTB summarizes the Board's accomplishments during 1987, its current activities, and its plans for the future. The report also includes information on Board and committee memberships, program organizations, and the reports produced. The report should provide the reader with a basic understanding of the WSTB's interests, achievements, and capabilities. The WSTB welcomes inquiries and suggestions concerning its activities and will provide more detailed information on any aspects of its work to those interested.

  2. Form:International Oil and Gas Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    International Oil and Gas Board Jump to: navigation, search International Oil and Gas Board This is the "International Oil and Gas Board" form. To create a page with this form,...

  3. Form:State Oil and Gas Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    State Oil and Gas Board Jump to: navigation, search State Oil and Gas Board This is the "State Oil and Gas Board" form. To create a page with this form, enter the page name below;...

  4. Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Board of Land Commissioners Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners Name: Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners Address: 300 N. 6th St, Suite...

  5. Eugene Water and Electric Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Eugene Water and Electric Board Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Eugene Water and Electric Board Name: Eugene Water and Electric Board Address: 500 East 4th Avenue Place: Eugene,...

  6. Independent Oversight Review, National Energy Technology Laboratory – May 2014

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Review of the Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness at the National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. ORNL: HVAC Lab Research - 2015 Peer Review | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Buildings Integration Program Overview - 2015 BTO Peer Review Space Conditioning Standing Technical Committee Strategic Plan Building America Expert Meeting: Recommended...

  8. Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Sandia Site Office- 2012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This self assessment examined how Sandia Site Office (SSO) executes the Technical Qualification Program (TQP) as measured by the current Federal Technical Capability Panel criteria review and approach documents (CRADs) included in the assessment plan.

  9. Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report- Savannah River Site Office- 2011

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This self assessment evaluates the effective implementation of the Technical Qualification Programs (TQP). The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) also reviews the results of the TQP self-assessments and determines if further action is necessary on a Departmental level.

  10. Key Board Products and Special Reports - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Key Board Products and Special Reports Hanford Advisory Board Convening Report SSAB Guidance Memorandum of Understanding Membership Nomination and Appointment Process Operating Ground Rules Calendars Advice and Responses Full Board Meeting Information Committee Meeting Information Outgoing Board Correspondence Key Board Products and Special Reports HAB Annual Report HAB and Committee Lists Points of Contact Related Links Key Board Products and Special Reports Email Email Page | Print Print Page

  11. Final Technical Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Stoessel, Chris

    2013-11-13

    This project developed a new high-performance R-10/high SHGC window design, reviewed market positioning and evaluated manufacturing solutions required for broad market adoption. The project objectives were accomplished by: identifying viable technical solutions based on modeling of modern and potential coating stacks and IGU designs; development of new coating material sets for HM thin film stacks, as well as improved HM IGU designs to accept multiple layers of HM films; matching promising new coating designs with new HM IGU designs to demonstrate performance gains; and, in cooperation with a window manufacturer, assess the potential for high-volume manufacturing and cost efficiency of a HM-based R-10 window with improved solar heat gain characteristics. A broad view of available materials and design options was applied to achieve the desired improvements. Gated engineering methodologies were employed to guide the development process from concept generation to a window demonstration. The project determined that a slightly de-rated window performance allows formulation of a path to achieve the desired cost reductions to support end consumer adoption.

  12. UNFCCC-GHG Inventory Review Training Program | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Logo: UNFCCC GHG inventory Review Training Program The Basic Course of the updated training programme covers technical aspects of the review of GHG inventories under the...

  13. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    3 Annual Meeting Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Saturday, August 17, 2013, 8 a.m. to noon Holiday Inn, Pigeon Forge, Tenn. The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB) met for its annual planning meeting beginning at 8 a.m., on Saturday, August 17, 2013, at the Holiday Inn, 3230 Parkway, Pigeon Forge, Tenn. The objectives of the meeting were to: * Develop an increased understanding of and commitment to the goals of the board * Evaluate the effectiveness and achievements of the

  14. FAPAC-NM Executive Board | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Our Locations Albuquerque Complex Federal Asian Pacific American Council - New Mexico Chapter Albuquerque, NM FAPAC-NM Executive Board FAPAC-NM Executive Board "Promoting...

  15. Mississippi State Oil and Gas Board | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oil and Gas Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: Mississippi State Oil and Gas Board Address: 500 Greymont Ave., Suite E Place: Mississippi Zip: 39202-3446 Website:...

  16. Phase II Accident Investigation Board Briefing | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Phase II Accident Investigation Board Briefing Phase II Accident Investigation Board Briefing Topic: Ted Wyka DOE, Provided a Brief on the Findings in the WIPP Accident ...

  17. Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the September 29...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the September 29, 2010, Radiological ... PDF icon Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the September 29, 2010, ...

  18. Los Alamos National Laboratory Accident Investigation Board Corrective...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Accident Investigation Board Corrective Action Plan Update Los Alamos National Laboratory Accident Investigation Board Corrective Action Plan Update Topic: Status of the Corrective ...

  19. Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the Brookhaven...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the Brookhaven National Laboratory Employee ... Building 1005H. PDF icon Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the ...

  20. Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the Bechtel Jacobs...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC Employee ... PDF icon Type B Accident Investigation Board Report of the Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC ...

  1. NNMCAB Board Agenda: May 2015 Albuquerque | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Project Prioritization" Update from Liaisons (DOE, LANL, NMED) Presentation DOE, WIPP Accident Investigation Board Report, Ted Wyka PDF icon Board Agenda - May 20, 2015 More ...

  2. Corporate Board By-Laws | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    by-laws of the EM QA Corporate Board. PDF icon By-Laws Office of Environmental Management Quality Assurance Corporate Board More Documents & Publications NNMCAB Bylaws ORSSAB...

  3. LANS Board of Governors extends Community Commitment Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    LANS Board of Governors extends Community Commitment Plan LANS Board of Governors extends Community Commitment Plan 3 million of the company's management fee invested each year in...

  4. Environmental Management Advisory Board U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Management Advisory Board U.S. Department of Energy Advisory Board Charter 1. Committee's ... program including, but not limited to, project management and oversight, costbenefit ...

  5. Unitech Printed Circuit Board Corp UPCB | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sector: Solar Product: Taiwan-based printed-circuit board maker with intent to enter into solar cell manufacturing industry. References: Unitech Printed Circuit Board Corp....

  6. Exhaust purification with on-board ammonia production (Patent...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Exhaust purification with on-board ammonia production Title: Exhaust purification with on-board ammonia production A method of ammonia production for a selective catalytic ...

  7. State Energy Advisory Board 2008 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    8 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory Board 2008 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2008 for the State Energy Advisory Board....

  8. State Energy Advisory Board 2009 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    9 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory Board 2009 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2009 for the State Energy Advisory Board....

  9. State Energy Advisory Board 2015 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    5 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory Board 2015 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2015 for the State Energy Advisory Board....

  10. State Energy Advisory Board October 2015 Meeting | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Agenda -- October 2015 Meeting Minutes -- October 2015 More Documents & Publications State Energy Advisory Board January 2015 Meeting State Energy Advisory Board 2014 Monthly...

  11. State Energy Advisory Board 2014 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory Board 2014 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2014 for the State Energy Advisory Board....

  12. State Energy Advisory Board 2011 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    1 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory Board 2011 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2011 for the State Energy Advisory Board....

  13. State Energy Advisory Board 2010 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    0 Monthly Teleconferences State Energy Advisory Board 2010 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occurring in 2010 for the State Energy Advisory Board....

  14. Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board Launches Revitalized...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    A view of Northern New Mexico Citizens Advisory Boards updated website. A view of Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board's updated website. SANTA FE, N.M. - The ...

  15. Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board webpage | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Pollution Control Hearings Board webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board webpage Abstract...

  16. State Energy Advisory Board 2012 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    State Energy Advisory Board 2012 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2012 for the State Energy Advisory Board. PDF icon December 20, 2012 ...

  17. State Energy Advisory Board 2007 Monthly Teleconferences | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    State Energy Advisory Board 2007 Monthly Teleconferences The minutes of the monthly teleconferences occuring in 2007 for the State Energy Advisory Board. PDF icon November 28, 2007 ...

  18. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board HPSEB | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board HPSEB Jump to: navigation, search Name: Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board (HPSEB) Place: Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India Zip: 171004...

  19. Punjab State Electricity Board PSEB | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    State Electricity Board PSEB Jump to: navigation, search Name: Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB) Place: Punjab, India Product: Goverment owned, power project developers and...

  20. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Update - Dale...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Update - Dale Govan, Departmental Representative to the DNFSB DNFSB Mission The Board provides independent analysis, advice and ...

  1. Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Committees | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Committees Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Committees Oak Ridge's Site Specific Advisory Board uses its committee structure to achieve its mission and conduct many of its...

  2. India National Hydrogen Energy Board NHEB | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hydrogen Energy Board NHEB Jump to: navigation, search Name: India National Hydrogen Energy Board (NHEB) Place: New Delhi, India Zip: 110 003 Sector: Hydro, Hydrogen Product: Set...

  3. Functional Area Qualification Standards Review Process | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Review Process Functional Area Qualification Standards Review Process Document Available for Download PDF icon Review Process for Technical Standards More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1176-2004 DOE-TSPP-4-2013, Developing DOE Technical Standards DOE-TSPP-5-2013, Coordination of Technical Standards

  4. The Independent Technical Analysis Process Final Report 2006-2007.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Duberstein, Corey; Ham, Kenneth; Dauble, Dennis; Johnson, Gary

    2007-03-01

    The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) contracted with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to provide technical analytical support for system-wide fish passage information (BPA Project No. 2006-010-00). The goal of this project was to produce rigorous technical analysis products using independent analysts and anonymous peer reviewers. This project provided an independent technical source for non-routine fish passage analyses while allowing routine support functions to be performed by other well-qualified entities. The Independent Technical Analysis Process (ITAP) was created to provide non-routine analysis for fish and wildlife agencies and tribes in particular and the public in general on matters related to juvenile and adult salmon and steelhead passage through the mainstem hydrosystem. The process was designed to maintain the independence of analysts and reviewers from parties requesting analyses, to avoid potential bias in technical products. The objectives identified for this project were to administer a rigorous, transparent process to deliver unbiased technical assistance necessary to coordinate recommendations for storage reservoir and river operations that avoid potential conflicts between anadromous and resident fish. Seven work elements, designated by numbered categories in the Pisces project tracking system, were created to define and accomplish project goals as follows: (1) 118 Coordination - Coordinate technical analysis and review process: (a) Retain expertise for analyst/reviewer roles. (b) Draft research directives. (c) Send directive to the analyst. (d) Coordinate two independent reviews of the draft report. (e) Ensure reviewer comments are addressed within the final report. (2) 162 Analyze/Interpret Data - Implement the independent aspects of the project. (3) 122 Provide Technical Review - Implement the review process for the analysts. (4) 132 Produce Annual Report - FY06 annual progress report with Pisces Disseminate (5) 161 Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results - Post technical products on the ITAP web site. (6) 185-Produce Pisces Status Report - Provide periodic status reports to BPA. (7) 119 Manage and Administer Projects - project/contract administration.

  5. Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Technical Assistance Request

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Portal User Guide | Department of Energy (FEMP) Technical Assistance Request Portal User Guide Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Technical Assistance Request Portal User Guide Document explains how to navigate the FEMP Technical Assistance request portal. It includes instruction on how to register for an account, submit a request for assistance, and review saved requests. PDF icon ta_portal_user_guide.pdf More Documents & Publications Industry Interactive Procurement System (IIPS)

  6. Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee 1.0 PURPOSE This charter describes the function and role of the Department of Energy (DOE) Hoisting and Rigging Technical Advisory Committee (HRTAC). The HRTAC serves as an advisory body to the Office of Health, Safety and Security (EHSS) by providing support to their policy efforts aimed at ensuring the safe performance of hoisting and rigging activities at DOE facilities and in the review and

  7. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting will be held January 11–15, 2015, in Washington, D.C. at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center. The event covers the entire transportation...

  8. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2011 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the March 30, 2011 Board meeting at Courtyard by Marriott Presentation DOE, FY'2012 DOE Budget, Ed Worth, Lee Bishop Presentation LANL, Independence of Analytical Labs. Nita Patel

  9. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2010 Ohkay Owingeh

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 13, 2010 Board meeting at Ohkay Conference Center Presentation DOE/LANS, Disposal Authority Statement and Performance Assessment and Composite Analyses, George Henkel, Sean French

  10. NNMCAB Board Minutes: September 2010 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the September 29, 2010 Board meeting at Sagebrush Inn Conference Center Presentation LANL, Storm Water Monitoring at LANL and Status of the Storm Water Permit, Steve Veenis Presentation LANL, Air Monitoring at LANL, Andrew Green

  11. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2005 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the March 30, 2005 Board meeting at Santa Fe Community College Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2005-03 Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2005-04

  12. NNMCAB Board Minutes: May 2009 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the May 15, 2009 Board meeting at Courtyard by Marriott Presentation Eight Northern Pueblos, Tribal Youth Summer Camp 2008, Jackie Gutierrez Presentation DOE, Implementation of NNMCAB Recommendations, Jeff Casalina

  13. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2009 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 28, 2009 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation DOE, Implementation on NNMCAB Recommendations, Jeff Casalina Presentation LANL, Well Network Analysis and Characterization of Groundwater at LANL Site, Danny Katzman

  14. NNMCAB Board Minutes: January 2010 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the January 27, 2010 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation LANL, Status of Corrective Actions, Dave McInroy Presentation DOE, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Nancy Werdel

  15. NNMCAB Board Minutes: March 2010 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the March 31, 2010 Board meeting at Lodge at Santa Fe Presentation DOE/LANL Los Alamos National Security Reorganization, George Rael, Michael Graham Presentation DOE, Inventory of Waste at Area G, George Henkel

  16. NNMCAB Board Minutes: November 2009 Santa Fe

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the November 18, 2009 Board meeting at Holiday Inn Presentation LANL, Groundwater Monitoring System, Danny Katzman Presentation NNMCAB, Remote Handled 33 Shafts at Area G, Robert Villarreal

  17. NNMCAB Board Minutes: July 2004 Pojoaque

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minutes of the July 28, 2004 Board meeting at Cities of Gold Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2004-03 " DOE's Commitment to Public Involvement" Consideration and Action on Recommendation 2004-04 " DOE's Quality Assurance Program"

  18. State Energy Advisory Board Official Documents

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    From Deployment Chasms to Energy Solutions: DOE’s Role in Accelerating Job Creation and Clean Energy Deployment, State Energy Advisory Board Market Transformation and Deployment Task Force Report, February 23, 2011.

  19. Tank Waste Corporate Board | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The following documents are associated with the Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting held on November 6th, 2008. Note: (Please contact Steven Ross at steven.ross@em.doe.gov for a HLW ...

  20. NNMCAB Board Agenda: July 2015 Taos

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Agenda for the July 29, 2015 Board meeting at the Sagebrush Inn Conference Center Presentation DOE, Los Alamos National Laboratory TRU Waste Update, David Nickless Presentation DOE, Overview of EM-LA Projects and Planning, Bob Pfaff