Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Tafel Musik: Formatting algorithm of tables  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper provides a description on the formatting algorithm of tables that the authors have developed. This algorithm is an important component of the so called TafeMusik (Tafel Musik) environment. TafeMusikprovides the user with an environment to ... Keywords: First-fit algorithm, Linear programming, Optimization, Tables, Tabular formatting, Tabular layout

K. -H. Shin; K. Kobayashi; A. Suzuki

1997-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

2

Accepted Manuscript Title: Fuel Pyrolysis through Porous Media: Coke Formation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Accepted Manuscript Title: Fuel Pyrolysis through Porous Media: Coke Formation and Coupled effect. Gascoin, P. Gillard, M. Bouchez, J. Steelant, Fuel Pyrolysis through Porous Media: Coke Formation Coke Formation and Coupled effect on Permeability2 G. Fau1* , N. Gascoin1 , P. Gillard1 , M. Bouchez2

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

3

Table C5-3 Biomedical Instrumentation Track Curriculum (Department, Number, Title)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

51 Table C5-3 Biomedical Instrumentation Track Curriculum Course (Department, Number, Title) List Introduction to Biomedical Engineering R 0 F11 & F12 80/84 1st Year - Spring Semester (19 Credits) HUM 102 Programming R 3 F12 & S13 30 BME 301* Electrical Fundamentals of Biomedical Engineering R 3 F12 & S13 25 BME

4

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

galleries, tunnels, short lengths of pipe leading from the spring, or storage tanks may still be found at some of them. Table 4. Records of springs in the Nevada Test...

5

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Sensitive Species Survey Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado December 1 993 & \ Environmental Restoration Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Environmentaf Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89 193-85 18 Prepared by: IT CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View BIvd., Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Performed under Contract No. DE-AC08-92NV 10972 December 1993 Table of Contents . . List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n ... List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv 1.0 Introduction .

6

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Floodplains and Wetlands Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado December 1 993 Environmental Restoration Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results tor the Rulison and Rio Blanco Sites, Colorado Prepared For: U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89 193-85 18 Prepared By: l T CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View Blvd., Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Performed under Contract No: DE-AC08-92NV 10972 December 1993 Table of Contents . . List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

7

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

68 68 OFF C . 2 Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1993 . I \ . j Environmental Restoration Sensitive Species Su wey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1 993 Environmental Restoration 1 Sensitive Species Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico Prepared for: U.S. Deparunenr of Energy Environmental Restoration Division DOE Nevada Operations Officc Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-851 8 Prepared by: I T CORPORATION 4330 S. Valley View Blvd.. Suite 114 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 103 Work Pcrformcd undcr Contract No. DE-AC08-92NV10972 Table of Contents List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii ... List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . .

8

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

early Permian in age and consist of 22,000 feet of limestone, dolomite, quartz- ite, shale, and conglomerate beds. The predominantly volcanic Oak Springs formation of Tertiary...

9

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Plates are not available in electronic format. Please e-mail lm.records@lm.doe.gov to request the appendix....

10

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Plates are not available in electronic format. Please e-mail lm.records@lm.doe.gov to request the appendix...

11

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Post-Remedial Action Report Post-Remedial Action Report for the Alba Craft Site and Vicinity Properties Oxford , Ohio August 1995 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE A D A CRAFT SITE AND VICINITY PROPERTIES OXFORD, OHIO AUGUST 1995 Prepared f o ~ United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-ACO5-910R21949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS Page FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii UNITS OF MEASURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Pantex Finance Benchmark Results Executive Briefing Pantex Finance Benchmark Results Executive Briefing © 2009 The Hackett Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this document or any portion thereof without prior written consent is prohibited. Table of Contents  Benchmark Background  Company Baseline  Executive Summary  Performance Driver Analysis  Recommendations & Next Steps  Appendix Page 3 NNSA - Pantex Finance Benchmark Results Executive Briefing © 2009 The Hackett Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this document or any portion thereof without prior written consent is prohibited. Benchmark Results Should be Evaluated in Conjunction With the Specific Requirements of Pantex's Industry What this benchmark is . . . What this benchmark is not . . .

13

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Certificafion Docket for the Certificafion Docket for the Remedial Action Performed af the Associate Aircraft Site, Fairfield, Ohio, 1994- 7 995 Department of Energy Former Sites Restoration Division Oak Ridge Operations Office October 7 996 @ Prnleo m recynmrec)c*ahe paper CERTIFICATION DOCKET FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION PERFORMED AT THE ASSOCIATE AIRCRAFT SITE, FAIRFIELO, OHIO, 1994-1995 OCTOBER 1996 Prepared for UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Oak Ridge Operations Oftice Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R21949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS page FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE ASSOCIATE AIRCRAJT SITE Fairfield, Ohio Bechtel National, Inc. POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE ASSOCIATE AIRCRAFT SITE FAIRFIELD. OHIO JULY 1996 Prepared for United States Depariment o f Energy Oak Ridge Operations Off= Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R2 1949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 . 1 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.0 REMEDIAL ACTION GUIDELINES .

15

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) - Contract No. DE-ACOS-9 1 OR21 949 Post-Remedial Action Report for the 8. & T Metals Site Columbus, Ohio October 1996 POST-REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT f OR THE . . B&T METALS SITE COLUMBUS. OHIO OCTOBER 1 W6 Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-ACOS-91 OR2 1949 I Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tcnncssoe I Bcchtel lob No. 14501 CONTENTS Page FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................... iv TABLES ................................................................................................................................................ iv

16

Format and Content Guide for Title 40 CFR 191 and Title 40 CFR 268.6 Compliance Reports  

SciTech Connect

This Format and Content Guide was followed in preparing the WIPP Compliance Status Report submitted in March 1994 and will be used for the compliance documents scheduled for submittal in the Spring of 1995. The Compliance Status Report was issued to stakeholders in March 1994 and describes the status of associated activities on compliance with the requirements in Title 40 CFR 268.6 and Title 40 CFR 191. The Compliance Status Report focuses on (1) the information required for a demonstration of compliance, (2) preliminary results, (3) the areas of the WIPP program that are either not currently mature enough, or do not provide adequate margin for a demonstration of compliance, and (4) the areas of the WIPP program that will be focused upon to provide the remaining necessary information for use in the 1995 compliance demonstration reports. The Compliance Status Report is not intended to constitute a statement of compliance or a demonstration of compliance. It is intended to report the status of progress made to date in project efforts to achieve the required level of data/information necessary for the required compliance demonstrations. Comments on the Compliance Status Report from stakeholders will likely result in a modified Format and Content Guide, as will the promulgation of the EPA`s Compliance Criteria for WIPP (40 CFR 194).

Not Available

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CNT OW048 CNT OW048 Review of Environmentally Sensitive Resources at Off-Site Locations Nevada Test Site Nevada ~nvironmental Restoration Review of Environmentally Sensitive Resources at Off-Site Locations Prepared for: U.S. Deparuncnt of Energy Nevada Field Office Las Vcgas, Nevada R e p d by: l T Corporation Las Vcgas, Nevada Work Pcrformcd Under Conmct DE-AC08-92NV10972 March, 1993 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.1 Hazardous. Contaminated. or Polluted Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 1.2 Environmentally Sensitive Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 1.2.1 Property of Historic. Archaeological. or Archirectural Significance . . . . . . 1-3 1 2 . 2 Threatened. Endangered. or Candidate Species .

18

TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ClTY/CO{TRIBAL): ClTY/CO{TRIBAL): DAT E RE CEIVED: CA-TR iBE-TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA OF CALIFORN IA 61 735 1 937 Tribe Oak Ridge Office COMPLETE STATE: CA Round Two Review: t I BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Develop energy efficiency and con servation strategy and fea si bility study ofthe Rancheria energy usage NEPA REVI EW ER NEPA DECISION (CX/EA/EIS): NHPA ISSU ES NEPAjNHPA CONDITIONS: S.G. Thornton ex CX APPLIED: CX-EECBG -001 LI SUBPART D REF Approval for strategy/feasibility st udy only Ny( Compliance Officer (NCO) Review, including consideration of extraordiOilfy circumstiinceS: ~ction may be categorically ucluded from further NEPA review. I hilve dete rmined that the proposed action meets the requirements for Cltegorical exclusion in Subpart D, Appendix A or B. C Action requires approvill by Head oft

19

Annual Energy Outlook 2007 - Low Price Case Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4-2030) 4-2030) Annual Energy Outlook 2007 with Projections to 2030 MS Excel Viewer Spreadsheets are provided in Excel Low Price Case Tables (2004-2030) Table Title Formats Summary Low Price Case Tables Low Price Case Tables Table 1. Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions Table 9. Electricity Generating Capacity Table 10. Electricity Trade Table 11. Petroleum Supply and Disposition Balance

20

Annual Energy Outlook 2007 - Low Economic Growth Case Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Low Macroeconomic Growth Case Tables (2004-2030) Low Macroeconomic Growth Case Tables (2004-2030) Annual Energy Outlook 2007 with Projections to 2030 MS Excel Viewer Spreadsheets are provided in Excel Low Economic Growth Case Tables (2004-2030) Table Title Formats Summary Low Economic Growth Case Tables Low Economic Growth Case Tables Table 1. Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions Table 9. Electricity Generating Capacity

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

IN FORMATION PU BLIC ATION SC H EME TITLE Agency plan for The Australian National University  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 | IN FORMATION PU BLIC ATION SC H EME TITLE Agency plan for The Australian National University on its website. It will be directly accessible from the webpage foi.anu.edu.au and be identified possible, provide online content that can be searched by web browsers Provide a search function

22

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

J J a s 1. Besl President Force Control Industries 3664 Dixla H i 9 h p ~ Falrfleld, Ohio 45014 Dear Hr. Besl: With your consent,. the U.S. Dcpartwnt o f Energy (WE) conducted a r a d i o l q l l c a l survey a t the Former Associate A i r c r a f t Tool and Manufrcturlng Conpany s l t e i n Fairfield, Ohio. OOE has received the-auwey report frm i t s survey. contractor, Oak Rldge national Laboratory (OWL). Two copies o f the report are enclosed f o r your information and use. 71.5 report C 0 n ~ l ~ d e S that uranium i s present I n the f a c i l l t y I n excess of the ME guidelines f ~ r restdual r a d l o i c t i v e matertal. This conclusion i s based on d i r e c t radiation r a s u r a r n t s (shorn graphically on Flgures 8 , 9, 14, and Table 5 on pages 8, 9, 22, and 29, respectively) and om analysls o f s o i l samples, dust sllples, m

23

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook 2010 - Low Economic Growth Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Economic Growth Tables (2007- 2035) Economic Growth Tables (2007- 2035) Annual Energy Outlook 2010 Main Low Economic Growth Tables (2007- 2035) Table Title Formats Summary Low Economic Growth Case Tables PDF Gif Year-by-Year Low Economic Growth Case Tables Excel Gif Table 1. Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary Excel Gif Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source Excel Gif Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source Excel Gif Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption Excel Gif Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions

24

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook 2010 - High Economic Growth Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Economic Growth Tables (2007-2035) Economic Growth Tables (2007-2035) Annual Energy Outlook 2010 Main High Economic Growth Tables (2007- 2035) Table Title Formats Summary High Economic Growth Case Tables PDF Gif Year-by-Year High Economic Growth Case Tables Excel Gif Table 1. Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary Excel Gif Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source Excel Gif Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source Excel Gif Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption Excel Gif Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions Excel Gif

25

Note: 2005 Changes in Coal Distribution Table Format and Data Sources  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Note: 2005 Changes in Coal Distribution Table Format and Data Sources" Note: 2005 Changes in Coal Distribution Table Format and Data Sources" "Domestic and Foreign Distribution of U.S. Coal by State of Origin, 2005 (Thousand Short Tons)" "State / Region","Domestic*","Foreign*","Total" "Alabama",5432,4214,9646 "Alaska",899,503,1402 "Arizona",12806,"- ",12806 "Arkansas",2,"- ",2 "Colorado",35766,706,36472 "Illinois",26664,284,26949 "Indiana",24074,11,24086 "Kansas",170,"- ",170 "Kentucky Total",100152,3148,103300 "East",77397,3127,80524 "West",22754,22,22776 "Louisiana",3970,"- ",3970 "Maryland",5252,754,6007

26

Annual Energy Outlook 2009 - High Price Case Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6-2030) 6-2030) Annual Energy Outlook 2009 with Projections to 2030 XLS GIF Spreadsheets are provided in Excel High Price Case Tables (2006-2030) Table Title Formats Summary High Price Case Tables PDF GIF High Price Case Tables XLS GIF Table 1. Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary XLS GIF Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source XLS GIF Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source XLS GIF Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption XLS GIF Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions XLS GIF Table 9. Electricity Generating Capacity

27

EIA - Appendix A - Reference Case Projection Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Tables (2005-2035) Tables (2005-2035) International Energy Outlook 2010 Reference Case Projections Tables (2005-2035) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 14 complete) Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Appendix A. Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table A1. World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table A2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

28

--No Title--  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

in Table 2.0. According to Title 40 CFR 61.93.(b)(4), (CFR 2002) no credit was taken for pollution control equipment in determining air emissions. The emissions for NESHAPs...

29

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook 2010 - Low Oil PriceTables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Oil Price Tables (2007-2035) Oil Price Tables (2007-2035) Annual Energy Outlook 2010 Main Low Oil Price Tables (2007- 2035) Table Title Formats Summary Low Oil Price Case Tables PDF Gif Year-by-Year Low Oil Price Case Tables Excel Gif Table 1. Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary Excel Gif Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source Excel Gif Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source Excel Gif Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption Excel Gif Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption Excel Gif Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions Excel Gif Table 9. Electricity Generating Capacity

30

EIA - Reference Case Projection Tables 1990-2030  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Tables (1990-2030) Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2006 Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 14 complete) Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region, Reference Case Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel, Reference Case Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

31

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook 2009 -Year-by-Year Reference Case Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Reference Case Tables (2006-2030) Reference Case Tables (2006-2030) Annual Energy Outlook 2009 with Projections to 2030 Year-by-Year Reference Case Tables (2006-2030) Table Title Formats Summary Reference Case Tables PDF GIF Year-by-Year Reference Case Tables Year-by-Year Reference Case Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table 1. Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary XLS GIF Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source XLS GIF Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source XLS GIF Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption

32

Annual Energy Outlook 2009 - Year-by-Year High Economic Growth Case Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

High Macroeconomic Growth Case Tables (2006-2030) High Macroeconomic Growth Case Tables (2006-2030) Annual Energy Outlook 2009 with Projections to 2030 XLS GIF Spreadsheets are provided in Excel Year-by-Year High Economic Growth Case Tables (2006-2030) Table Title Formats Summary High Economic Growth Case Tables PDF GIF High Economic Growth Case Tables XLS GIF Table 1. Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary XLS GIF Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source XLS GIF Table 3. Energy Prices by Sector and Source XLS GIF Table 4. Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 5. Commercial Sector Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 6. Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption XLS GIF Table 7. Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption XLS GIF Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions

33

EIA - Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables 1990-2030  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2006 Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 13 complete) Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table C1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region, Low Economic Growth Case Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table C2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel, Low Economic Growth Case

34

EIA - Appendix A - Reference Case Projection Tables 1990-2030  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Tables (1990-2030) Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2009 Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 14 complete) Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table A1. World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table A2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

35

EIA - Appendix D - High Price Case Projections Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

High Price Case Projections Tables (2005-2035) High Price Case Projections Tables (2005-2035) International Energy Outlook 2010 High Oil Price Case Projections Tables (2005-2035) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 12 complete) High Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Appendix D. High Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table D1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table D1. World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table D2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table D2. World total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

36

EIA - Appendix A - Reference Case Projection Tables 1990-2030  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2008 Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 14 complete) Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table A1. World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table A2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

37

EIA - International Energy Outlook 2007-Reference Case Projection Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2007 Reference Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 14 complete) Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Reference Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table A1. World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table A2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table A2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

38

EIA - High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables 1990-2030  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2006 High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 13 complete) High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table B1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region, High Economic Growth Case High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

39

Title Standards 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards 2001 Standards 2001 A guide for the preparation of title evidence in land acquisitions by the United States of America. Quick links to Contents: Table of Contents / Why Title Standards 2001, and who uses it? / Evidence of title / Abstract of Title Supplemental and Supporting Title Evidence / Title Insurance Policies and Certificates of Title / Final Title Evidence Title Evidence for Condemnations / The Deed to the United States / Special Standards for Texas / Sample Forms U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Land Acquisition Section Washington, D.C. 20530 December 29, 2000 (reprint March 23, 2001) [Editor's Note: The reprint of March 23, 2001, added page numbers to the table of contents; added a new item "3" to part B of Form # 1 of the Certificate of Inspection and Possession,

40

1992 CBECS Detailed Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Detailed Tables Detailed Tables To download all 1992 detailed tables: Download Acrobat Reader for viewing PDF files. Yellow Arrow Buildings Characteristics Tables (PDF format) (70 tables, 230 pages, file size 1.39 MB) Yellow Arrow Energy Consumption and Expenditures Tables (PDF format) (47 tables, 208 pages, file size 1.28 MB) Yellow Arrow Energy End-Use Tables (PDF format) (6 tables, 6 pages, file size 31.7 KB) Detailed tables for other years: Yellow Arrow 1999 CBECS Yellow Arrow 1995 CBECS Background information on detailed tables: Yellow Arrow Description of Detailed Tables and Categories of Data Yellow Arrow Statistical Significance of Data 1992 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) Detailed Tables Data from the 1992 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) are presented in three groups of detailed tables:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Adobe Acrobat Reader is required for PDF format Excel logo Spreadsheets are provided in excel 1 to117 - Complete set of Supplemental Tables PDF Energy Consumption by Sector (Census Division) Table 1. New England XLS PDF Table 2. Middle Atlantic XLS PDF Table 3. East North Central XLS PDF Table 4. West North Central XLS PDF Table 5. South Atlantic XLS PDF Table 6. East South Central XLS PDF Table 7. West South Central XLS PDF Table 8. Mountain XLS PDF Table 9. Pacific XLS PDF Table 10. Total United States XLS PDF Energy Prices by Sector (Census Division) Table 11. New England XLS PDF Table 12. Middle Atlantic XLS PDF Table 13. East North Central XLS PDF Table 14. West North Central XLS PDF Table 15. South Atlantic XLS PDF Table 16. East South Central

42

EIA - Appendix E-Low Price Case Projections Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

10 > Low Price Case Projections (2005-2035) 10 > Low Price Case Projections (2005-2035) International Energy Outlook 2010 Low Oil Price Case Projections Tables (2005-2035) Formats Table Data Titles (1 to 12 complete) Low Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Appendix E. Low Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table E1 World Total Energy Consumption by Region Table E1. World Total Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table E2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table E2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

43

EIA - Appendix B - High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 > High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) 8 > High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2008 High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 12 complete) High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. High World Oil Price Case Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table B1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table B1. World Total Primary energy consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table B2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table B2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

44

EIA - Appendix B - High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2009 High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 12 complete) High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. High Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table B1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table B1. World Total Primary energy consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table B2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table B2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

45

EIA - Appendix D - High Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

High Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) High Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2009 High Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 12 complete) High Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. High Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table D1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table D1. World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table D2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table D2. World total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

46

EIA - Appendix D - High Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

High Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) High Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2008 High Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 12 complete) High Price Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. High World Oil Price Case Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table D1 World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region Table D1. World Total Primary Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table D2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table D2. World total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

47

EIA - Appendix C - Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2009 Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 12 complete) Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table C1 World Total Energy Consumption by Region Table C1. World Total Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table C2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table C2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

48

EIA - Appendix C - Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2008 Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables (1990-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 12 complete) Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Low Economic Growth Case Projection Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table C1 World Total Energy Consumption by Region Table C1. World Total Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table C2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel Table C2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

49

EIA - Appendix J-Kaya Identity Factor Projections Tables (2005-2035)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Kaya Identity Factor Projections Tables (2005-2035) Kaya Identity Factor Projections Tables (2005-2035) International Energy Outlook 2010 Kaya Identity Projections Tables (2005-2035) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 4 complete) Appendix J.Kaya Identity Factor Projections Tables (2006-2035). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Appendix J.Kaya Identity Factor Projections Tables (2006-2035). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table J1 World Population by Region, Reference Case Table J1. World Population by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table J2 World Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita by Region Expressed in Purchasing Power Parity, Reference Case Table J2. World Gross Domestic Product per Capita by Region Expressed in Purchasing Power Parity. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

50

1995 Detailed Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Households, Buildings & Industry > Commercial Buildings Energy Households, Buildings & Industry > Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey > Detailed Tables 1995 Detailed Tables Data from the 1995 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) are presented in three groups of detailed tables: Buildings Characteristics Tables, number of buildings and amount of floorspace for major building characteristics. Energy Consumption and Expenditures Tables, energy consumption and expenditures for major energy sources. Energy End-Use Data, total, electricity and natural gas consumption and energy intensities for nine specific end-uses. Summary Table—All Principal Buildings Activities (HTML Format) Background information on detailed tables: Description of Detailed Tables and Categories of Data Statistical Significance of Data

51

EIA - Appendix E-Low Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

09 > Low Price Case Projections (1990-2030) 09 > Low Price Case Projections (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2009 Low Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Table Data Titles (1 to 12 complete) Low Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Low Oil Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030). Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table E1 World Total Energy Consumption by Region, Low Price Case Table E1. World Total Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table E2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel, Low Price Case Table E2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

52

EIA - Appendix E-Low Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Low Price Case Projections (1990-2030) Low Price Case Projections (1990-2030) International Energy Outlook 2008 Low Price Case Projections Tables (1990-2030) Formats Table Data Titles (1 to 12 complete) Low Price Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Low Price Case Projections Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table E1 World Total Energy Consumption by Region, Low Price Case Table E1. World Total Energy Consumption by Region. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table E2 World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel, Low Price Case Table E2. World Total Energy Consumption by Region and Fuel. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

53

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Adobe Acrobat Reader is required for PDF format. Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Adobe Acrobat Reader is required for PDF format. MS Excel Viewer Spreadsheets are provided in excel Errata - August 25, 2004 1 to117 - Complete set of of Supplemental Tables PDF Table 1. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (New England) XLS PDF Table 2. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (Middle Atlantic) XLS PDF Table 3. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (East North Central) XLS PDF Table 4. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (West North Central) XLS PDF Table 5. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (South Atlantic) XLS PDF Table 6. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (East South Central) XLS PDF Table 7. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (West South Central) XLS PDF Table 8. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (Mountain)

54

Table Search (or Ranking Tables)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

;Table Search #3 #12;Outline · Goals of table search · Table search #1: Deep Web · Table search #3 search Table search #1: Deep Web · Table search #3: (setup): Fusion Tables · Table search #2: WebTables ­Version 1: modify document search ­Version 2: recover table semantics #12;Searching the Deep Web store

Halevy, Alon

55

1999 CBECS Detailed Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) > Detailed Tables Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) > Detailed Tables 1999 CBECS Detailed Tables Building Characteristics | Consumption & Expenditures Data from the 1999 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) are presented in the Building Characteristics tables, which include number of buildings and total floorspace for various Building Characteristics, and Consumption and Expenditures tables, which include energy usage figures for major energy sources. A table of Relative Standard Errors (RSEs) is included as a worksheet tab in each Excel tables. Complete sets of RSE tables are also available in .pdf format. (What is an RSE?) Preliminary End-Use Consumption Estimates for 1999 | Description of 1999 Detailed Tables and Categories of Data

56

TITLE48CHAPTER9  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TITLE 48 CHAPTER 9 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS TITLE 48 CHAPTER 9 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACQUISITION REGULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Subchapter A - General 901 - Federal Acquisition Regulations System 902 - Definitions of words and terms 903 - Improper business practices and personal conflicts of interest 904 - Administrative matters Subchapter B - Acquisition Planning 905 - Publicizing contract actions 906 - Competition requirements 908 - Required sources of supplies and services 909 - Contractor qualifications 911 - Describing Agency needs 912 - Acquisition of Commercial Items Subchapter C - Contracting Methods and Contract Types 913 - Simplified acquisition procedures 914 - Sealed bidding 915 - Contracting by negotiation 916 - Types of contracts

57

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

The AEO Supplementary tables were generated for the reference case of the The AEO Supplementary tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2002 (AEO2002) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 1999 to 2020. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2002, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2002 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of one hundred and seven tables is presented. The data for tables 10 and 20 match those published in AEO2002 Appendix tables A2 and A3, respectively. Forecasts for 2000-2002 may differ slightly from values published in the Short Term Energy Outlook, which are the official EIA short-term forecasts and are based on more current

58

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Homepage Homepage Supplement Tables to the AEO2001 The AEO Supplementary tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2001 (AEO2001) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 1999 to 2020. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2001, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2001 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of ninety-five tables is presented. The data for tables 10 and 20 match those published in AEO2001 Appendix tables A2 and A3, respectively. Forecasts for 1999 and 2000 may differ slightly from values published in the Short Term Energy Outlook, which are the official EIA short-term forecasts and are based on more current information than the AEO.

59

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

AEO Supplementary tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2000 (AEO2000) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 1998 to 2020. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2000, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2000 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of ninety-six tables are presented. AEO Supplementary tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2000 (AEO2000) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 1998 to 2020. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2000, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2000 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of ninety-six tables are presented. The data for tables 10 and 20 match those published in AEO200 Appendix tables A2 and A3, respectively. Forecasts for 1998, and 2000 may differ slightly from values published in the Short Term Energy Outlook, Fourth Quarter 1999 or Short Term Energy Outlook, First Quarter 2000, which are the official EIA short-term forecasts and are based on more current information than the AEO.

60

--No Title--  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Table 43. Refiner No. 2 Distillate, and Fuel Oil Volumes by PAD District and State (Thousand Gallons per Day) ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation - Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Analysis Papers > Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation>Tables Analysis Papers > Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation>Tables Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation Download Adobe Acrobat Reader Printer friendly version on our site are provided in Adobe Acrobat Spreadsheets are provided in Excel Actual vs. Forecasts Formats Table 2. Total Energy Consumption Excel, PDF Table 3. Total Petroleum Consumption Excel, PDF Table 4. Total Natural Gas Consumption Excel, PDF Table 5. Total Coal Consumption Excel, PDF Table 6. Total Electricity Sales Excel, PDF Table 7. Crude Oil Production Excel, PDF Table 8. Natural Gas Production Excel, PDF Table 9. Coal Production Excel, PDF Table 10. Net Petroleum Imports Excel, PDF Table 11. Net Natural Gas Imports Excel, PDF Table 12. World Oil Prices Excel, PDF Table 13. Natural Gas Wellhead Prices

62

Help:Tables | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tables Tables Jump to: navigation, search Tables may be authored in wiki pages using either XHTML table elements directly, or using wikicode formatting to define the table. XHTML table elements and their use are well described on various web pages and will not be discussed here. The benefit of wikicode is that the table is constructed of character symbols which tend to make it easier to perceive the table structure in the article editing view compared to XHTML table elements. As a general rule, it is best to avoid using a table unless you need one. Table markup often complicates page editing. Contents 1 Wiki table markup summary 2 Basics 2.1 Table headers 2.2 Caption 3 XHTML attributes 3.1 Attributes on tables 3.2 Attributes on cells 3.3 Attributes on rows 3.4 HTML colspan and rowspan

63

EIA - Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6 > Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Tables (2003-2030) 6 > Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Tables (2003-2030) International Energy Outlook 2006 Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Tables (2003-2030) Formats Data Table Titles (1 to 19 complete) Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Data Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Data Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table D1 Total World Delivered Energy Consumption Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Data Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Reference Case Projections by End-Use Sector and Region Data Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

64

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

achievement in research centered on the science and technology of the rare earths. Rare earth elements on the periodic table include cerium, gadolinium and ytterbium and lie...

65

Title of Document | 1 UC Learning Center  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Title of Document | 1 UC Learning Center Table of Contents Introduction to the UC Learning Center ......................................................................................................................................19 #12;Title of Document | 2 Last updated 6/30/10 Introduction to the UC Learning Center The UC. It is recommended that only supported browsers be used for eCourses to ensure proper tracking of completions. Plug

Gleeson, Joseph G.

66

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2005 Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2005 EIA Glossary Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2005 Release date: February 2005 Next release date: February 2006 The AEO Supplemental tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (AEO2005) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 2003 to 2025. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2005, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2005 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of one hundred and seventeen tables is presented. The data for tables 10 and 20 match those published in AEO2005 Appendix tables A2 and A3, respectively. Forecasts for 2003-2005 may differ slightly from values published in the Short Term Energy Outlook, which are the official EIA short-term forecasts and are based on more current information than the AEO.

67

Implementation of Title V in California  

SciTech Connect

This presentation provides information on California`s Title V operating permit programs for stationary sources mandated by the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments. It covers background, applicability, regulatory history, requirements, and issues. In addition, specific information is provided on the progress of Title V implementation in California, including: the roles of implementing agencies, the status of district Title V programs, number and distribution of Title V sources, cost of Title V implementation, and highlights of Title V implementation in the State. The question and answer format is intended to facilitate easy access to specific information related to the Title V operating permit programs in California.

Werner, B.; Cook, B.

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

68

Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation - Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Modeling and Analysis Papers> Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation>Tables Modeling and Analysis Papers> Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation>Tables Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation Actual vs. Forecasts Available formats Excel (.xls) for printable spreadsheet data (Microsoft Excel required) MS Excel Viewer PDF (Acrobat Reader required Download Acrobat Reader ) Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Table 2. Total Energy Consumption Excel, PDF Table 3. Total Petroleum Consumption Excel, PDF Table 4. Total Natural Gas Consumption Excel, PDF Table 5. Total Coal Consumption Excel, PDF Table 6. Total Electricity Sales Excel, PDF Table 7. Crude Oil Production Excel, PDF Table 8. Natural Gas Production Excel, PDF Table 9. Coal Production Excel, PDF Table 10. Net Petroleum Imports Excel, PDF Table 11. Net Natural Gas Imports Excel, PDF

69

Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation - Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation Actual vs. Forecasts Available formats Excel (.xls) for printable spreadsheet data (Microsoft Excel required) PDF (Acrobat Reader required) Table 2. Total Energy Consumption HTML, Excel, PDF Table 3. Total Petroleum Consumption HTML, Excel, PDF Table 4. Total Natural Gas Consumption HTML, Excel, PDF Table 5. Total Coal Consumption HTML, Excel, PDF Table 6. Total Electricity Sales HTML, Excel, PDF Table 7. Crude Oil Production HTML, Excel, PDF Table 8. Natural Gas Production HTML, Excel, PDF Table 9. Coal Production HTML, Excel, PDF Table 10. Net Petroleum Imports HTML, Excel, PDF Table 11. Net Natural Gas Imports HTML, Excel, PDF Table 12. Net Coal Exports HTML, Excel, PDF Table 13. World Oil Prices HTML, Excel, PDF

70

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Time: 2014-11-18 08:00:00 6456Proposal: NS-2014-6456-A PI: Paris Wiley Institution: Honeywell Corporation Title: Neutron Single Event Effects T... Start Time: 2014-11-19 08:00:00...

71

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

talks: 18 Presentation number Start time End time Presenter (if not author) First Author Remote Title Primary Task Force Area Alternate Task Force Area 101 9:30 9:37 Irby, Jim...

72

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ImageRotator.items href: 'javascript:void(0)', alt: 'Mule deer near cocooned reactor', title: 'Mule deer near cocooned reactor', image: src: 'http:www.hanford.govc.cfm...

73

--No Title--  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

So what happens, like a house 4 that has paint flaking off of it and the need 5 of repair, these EIA publications can carry 6 four of these tables over the years, which 7...

74

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook 1999 Annual Energy Outlook 1999 bullet1.gif (843 bytes) Assumptions to the AEO99 bullet1.gif (843 bytes) NEMS Conference bullet1.gif (843 bytes) Contacts bullet1.gif (843 bytes) To Forecasting Home Page bullet1.gif (843 bytes) EIA Homepage supplemental.gif (7420 bytes) (Errata as of 9/13/99) The AEO Supplementary tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 1999 (AEO99) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 1997 to 2020. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO99, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO99 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of ninety-five tables are presented.

75

unknown title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

is a schematic of the fission theory for formation of planets and major moons. The left column is the

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title: DEVELOPING A Title: DEVELOPING A COMPREHENSIVE RISK ASSESMENT FRAMEWORK FOR GEOLOGICAL STORAGE OF CO2 Ian Duncan University of Texas U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Infrastructure for CCS August 20-22, 2013 2 Presentation Outline 1. Benefit to the Program 2. Goals and Objectives 3. Technical Status Project 4. Accomplishments to Date 5. Summary 3 Benefit to the Program The research project is developing a comprehensive understanding of the programmatic (business), and technical risks associated with CCS particularly the likelihood of leakage and its potential consequences. This contributes to the Carbon Storage Program's effort of ensuring 99 percent CO

77

Project title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project title: Roseville Elverta (RSC-ELV) OPGW Replacement Project Project title: Roseville Elverta (RSC-ELV) OPGW Replacement Project Requested By: David Young Mail Code : N1410 Phone: 916-353-4542 Date Submitted: 5/4/2011 Date Required: 5/7/2011 Description of the Project: Purpose and Need The Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Region (SNR), is responsible for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of federally owned and operated transmission lines, Switchyards, and facilities throughout California. Western and Reclamation must comply with the National Electric Safety Code, Western States Coordinating Council (WECC), and internal directives for protecting human safety, the physical environment, and maintaining the reliable operation of the transmission system. There is an existing OPGW communications fiber on the transmission towers between Roseville and Elverta

78

TITLE PAGE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title: Seismic and Rockphysics Diagnostics of Title: Seismic and Rockphysics Diagnostics of Multiscale Reservoir Textures Type of Report: Final Technical Reporting Start Date: April 1, 2005 Reporting End Date: June 30, 2005 Principal Investigator: Prof. Gary Mavko Date of Report: July 2005 DOE Award Number: DE-FC26-01BC15354 Submitting Organization: Stanford University, 651 Serra Street, Suite 260, Stanford, CA 94305-4125 1 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warrantee, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not

79

--No Title--  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

early Permian in age and consist of 22,000 feet of limestone, dolomite, quartzite, shale, and conglomerate beds. The predominantly volcanic Oak Springs formation of Tertiary...

80

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Catania Meeting WCI Workshop I: "Dynamics and Thermodynamics with Nucleonic Degrees of Freedom" Workshop Format Orientations of WCI as decided at WCI Workshop I Web Discussion...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

--No Title--  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

File 9: Natural Gas and Fuel Oil (cb86f09.csv) Ques- tion- naire Variable Variable Variable Variable item Description Name Position Format Building identifier BLDGID3 1- 5 Adjusted...

82

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

City*: StateProvince*: ZipPostal Code*: Country*: Work Phone*: (format: XXX-XXX-XXXX) Cell Phone: Fax: Email*: Foreign National*: No Yes Country of Citizenship*: Country of...

83

--No Title--  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CNMS D Friday, May 30, 2008 11:00 am Iran Thomas Auditorium, 8600 Light refreshments will be served "Visualizing Pair Formation on the Nanometer Scale and the Riddle of...

84

--No Title--  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

File 10: Fuel Oil (CBECS89.A10) Ques- tion- naire Variable Variable Variable Variable item Description Name Position Format FILE10 CASEID Building identifier BLDGID4 1- 5 Census...

85

PROJECT TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richmond Richmond PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - Solar Compactors and Recycling Units Page 1 of2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-0000013 Procurement Instrument Number DE-EE0000878 NEPA Control Number cm Number GFO-0000878-003 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

86

PROJECT TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baltimore Baltimore PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - GHG Scrubbing System Page 1 of2 STATE: MD Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-EE0000738 GFO-0000738-002 0 Based all my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: All Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

87

PRESENTATION TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Southwestern Regional Southwestern Regional Hydropower Conference Michael Biggs, PE Chief, Reservoir Control Section Hydraulics & Technical Services Branch Little Rock District 16 June 2011 BUILDING STRONG ® White River Operations BUILDING STRONG ® Typical River Basin BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Multi Purpose Project BUILDING STRONG ® Typical River Section BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Regulating Station BUILDING STRONG ® White River Basin and Projects BUILDING STRONG ® White River System  Operated as a SYSTEM of reservoirs ► Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork are a 4-lake subsystem ► Greers Ferry ► Clearwater  "Comprehensive" system of water control regulation ► encompasses the entire White River basin ► 1 water control plan  Operation of the system is VERY COMPLEX

88

Conversion Tables  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center - Conversion Tables Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center - Conversion Tables Contents taken from Glossary: Carbon Dioxide and Climate, 1990. ORNL/CDIAC-39, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Third Edition. Edited by: Fred O'Hara Jr. 1 - International System of Units (SI) Prefixes 2 - Useful Quantities in CO2 3 - Common Conversion Factors 4 - Common Energy Unit Conversion Factors 5 - Geologic Time Scales 6 - Factors and Units for Calculating Annual CO2 Emissions Using Global Fuel Production Data Table 1. International System of Units (SI) Prefixes Prefix SI Symbol Multiplication Factor exa E 1018 peta P 1015 tera T 1012 giga G 109 mega M 106 kilo k 103 hecto h 102 deka da 10 deci d 10-1 centi c 10-2

89

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DE-FE0002225: DE-FE0002225: Actualistic and geochemical modeling of reservoir rock, CO 2 and formation fluid interaction, Citronelle oil field, Alabama West Virginia University & University of Alabama Presenter: Dr. Amy Weislogel (WVU) Co-PI: Dr. Rona Donahoe (UA) U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Presentation Outline * Benefits * Overview & Project Map * Reservoir Geochemical Characterization * Formation Fluid Geochemistry * Geochemical Modeling * Summary 3 Benefit to the Program * Develop technologies that will support industries'

90

Nature Bulletin Table of Contents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Table of Contents: Table of Contents: Here is our table of contents for the Forset Preserve District of Cook Country Nature Bulletins. To search, go to the Natuere Bulletin's Search Engine and type in your topic. You can also use your browser's "FIND" command to search the 750+ article titles here for a specific subject! Fish Smother Under Ice Coyotes in Cook County Tough Times for the Muskrats Wild Geese and Ducks Fly North Squirrels Spring Frogs Snapping Turtles A Phenomenal Spring Good People Do Not Pick Wildflowers Fire is the Enemy of Field and Forest Crows Earthworms Bees Crayfish Floods Handaxes and Knives in the Forest Preserves Ant Sanctuary Conservation Mosquitoes More About Mosquitoes Fishing in the Forest Preserve Our River Grasshoppers Chiggers Ticks Poison Ivy Fireflies

91

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Infrastructure for CCS August 20-22, 2013 DE-FE0001159 Advanced Technologies for Monitoring CO 2 Saturation and Pore Pressure in Geologic Formations Gary Mavko Rock Physics Project/Stanford University 2 Presentation Outline * Benefit to the Program * Project Overview * Motivating technical challenge * Approach * Technical Status - Laboratory results - Theoretical modeling * Summary Mavko: Stanford University 3 Benefit to the Program * Program goals being addressed. - Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations. - Develop technologies to demonstrate that 99% of injected CO 2 remains in injection zones. * Project benefits statement.

92

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0-22, 2013 0-22, 2013 2 Presentation Outline * Benefit to the Program * Project Overview: Goals and Objectives * Technical Status * Accomplishments to Date * Summary * Appendix 3 Benefit to the Program * Advanced simulation tool for quantifying transport in porous and fractured geological formations during CO 2 sequestration that includes all mechanisms: convection, diffusion, dissolution and chemical reactions * A simulator that can fully model these processes does not currently exist * Simulator will contribute to our ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations, to within ±30 percent 4 Project Overview: Goals and Objectives Comprehensive reservoir simulator for investigation of CO 2 non-isothermal, multiphase flow and long-term storage in

93

TITLE XVII Application Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Title XVII Innovative Clean Energy Projects (Title XVII) loan program is currently accepting applications in response to open technology-specific solicitations.

94

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................II  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

i i ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................... 4 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 6 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) .................... 6

95

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Factors Influencing Factors Influencing CO 2 Storage Capacity and Injectivity in Eastern Gas Shales Contract No. DE-FE0004633 Michael Godec, Vice President Advanced Resources International mgodec@adv-res.com U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Presentation Outline * Program Benefits * Goals and Objectives * Technical Status * Accomplishments to Date * Summary * Appendix 3 Benefits to the Program * Program Goals Addressed - Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent.

96

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Training and Research Peter M. Walsh University of Alabama at Birmingham U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CCUS Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania August 21-23, 2012 DE-FE0002224 * Evaluation of the sealing capacity of caprocks serving as barriers to upward migration of CO 2 sequestered in geologic formations. * Education and training of undergraduate and graduate students, through independent research on geologic sequestration. * Education, through an advanced undergraduate/graduate level course on coal combustion and gasification, climate change, and carbon sequestration. * Simulation of CO 2 migration and trapping in storage

97

Presentation Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview for Newcomers R. Arnold, NV R. Pinney, NJ M. Wangler, DC N. Weber, NM National Transportation Stakeholders Forum 14 May 2013 www.energy.gov/EM 2 Orientation Format * Overview presentation by M. Wangler. * Experiential discussions by R. Arnold, R. Pinney and N. Weber. * Q & A by participants. www.energy.gov/EM 3 Overview Presentation Topics * History of External Coordination * Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) * Background * Some founding principles * Historical issues * Performance goals * Key accomplishments of TEC * National Transportation Stakeholders Forum * Information sharing * Addressing issues and concerns * Working Groups * Continuing focus * 2013 NTSF Meeting * Newsletter www.energy.gov/EM 4 History * Forums existed for addressing issues with communities

98

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CCS CCS Project Number 49607 Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Benefit to the Program * Program goals being addressed. - Increased control of reservoir pressure, reduced risk of CO2 migration, and expanded formation storage capacity. * Project benefits statement. - This work supports the development of active reservoir management approaches by identifying cost effective and environmentally benign strategies for managing extracted brines (Tasks 1 + 2). - This work will help identify water related constraints on CCS deployment and provide insight into

99

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Advanced Resources International, Inc. Advanced Resources International, Inc. U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Presentation Outline * Benefit to the Program * Project Overview * Technical Status * Accomplishments to Date * Summary * Appendix 3 Benefit to the Program * Program goal being addressed: - Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent. * Project benefits statement: - This research seeks to develop a set of robust mathematical modules to predict how coal and shale permeability and

100

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Leakage Pathways and Leakage Pathways and Mineralization within Caprocks for Geologic Storage of CO 2 Project DE-FC26-0xNT4 FE0001786 James P. Evans Utah State University U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Presentation Outline * Benefits * Goals and Objectives * Relationship to overall program goals * Overview of seal bypass * Technical status; bypass systems - Field based studies - Technological advances * Accomplishments and Summary * Appendices 3 Benefit to the Program * Program goals addressed * Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0-22, 2013 0-22, 2013 Collaborators Zhengrong Wang, Yale University Kevin Johnson, University of Hawaii 2 Presentation Outline * Program Focus Area and DOE Connections * Goals and Objectives * Scope of Work * Technical Discussion * Accomplishments to Date * Project Wrap-up * Appendix (Organization Chart, Gantt Chart, and Bibliography 3 Benefit to the Program * Program goals addressed: - Technology development to predict CO 2 storage capacity - Demonstrate fate of injected CO 2 and most common contaminants * Project benefits statement: This research project conducts modeling, laboratory studies, and pilot-scale research aimed at developing new technologies and new systems for utilization of basalt formations for long term subsurface storage of CO 2 . Findings from this project

102

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SECARB Anthropogenic Test: SECARB Anthropogenic Test: CO 2 Capture/Transportation/Storage Project # DE-FC26-05NT42590 Jerry Hill, Southern Sates Energy Board Richard A. Esposito, Southern Company U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 Presentation Outline * Benefit to the Program * Project Overview * Technical Status - CO 2 Capture - CO 2 Transportation - CO 2 Storage * Accomplishments to Date * Organization Chart * Gantt Chart * Bibliography * Summary Benefit to the Program 1. Predict storage capacities within +/- 30% * Conducted high resolution reservoir characterization of the Paluxy saline formation key

103

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

behavior of shales as behavior of shales as seals and storage reservoirs for CO2 Project Number: Car Stor_FY131415 Daniel J. Soeder USDOE/NETL/ORD U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Infrastructure for CCS August 20-22, 2013 2 Project Overview: Goals and Objectives * Program Goals - Support industry's ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent. - Develop technologies to improve reservoir storage efficiency while ensuring containment effectiveness * Project Objectives - Assess how shales behave as caprocks in contact with CO 2 under a variety of conditions - Assess the viability of depleted gas shales to serve as storage reservoirs for sequestered CO

104

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Investigation of the CO Investigation of the CO 2 Sequestration in Depleted Shale Gas Formations Project Number DE-FE-0004731 Jennifer Wilcox, Tony Kovscek, Mark Zoback Stanford University, School of Earth Sciences U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Outline * Project Benefits * Technical Status * Imaging at mm- to micron-scales using CT - Permeability measurements and application of the Klinkenberg effect - Molecular Dynamics simulations for permeability and viscosity estimates * Accomplishments to Date * Summary Stanford University 3 Benefit to the Program * Carbon Storage Program major goals

105

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Michael G. Waddell Earth Sciences and Resources Institute University of South Carolina U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 20-22, 2013 2 Presentation Outline * Project goals and benefits * Overview of the geology of the South Georgia Rift basin in SC * Results of petrographic and core analysis from the Rizer #1 * Future investigations in the SGR * Summary 3 Benefit to the Program Program Goals: * Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent. * Develop technologies to demonstrate that 99 percent of injected

106

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CCS CCS August 20-22, 2013 2 Presentation Outline * Benefits to the program * Project overall objectives * Technical status * Project summary * Conclusions and future plans 3 Benefit to the Program * Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent. * Develop technologies to demonstrate that 99 percent of injected CO 2 remains in the injection zones. * This research project develops a reservoir scale CO 2 plume migration model at the Sleipner project, Norway. The Sleipner project in the Norwegian North Sea is the world's first commercial scale geological carbon storage project. 4D seismic data have delineated the CO 2 plume migration history. The relatively long history and high fidelity data make

107

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Large Volume Injection of CO Large Volume Injection of CO 2 to Assess Commercial Scale Geological Sequestration in Saline Formations in the Big Sky Region Project Number: DE-FC26-05NT42587 Dr. Lee Spangler Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership Montana State University U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Presentation Outline * Goals and Objectives * Project overview * Kevin Dome characteristics * Project design philosophy * Infrastructure * Modeling * Monitoring * Project Opportunities 3 Benefit to the Program Program goals being addressed. * Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO

108

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Scale CO Scale CO 2 Injection and Optimization of Storage Capacity in the Southeastern United States Project Number: DE-FE0010554 George J. Koperna, Jr. Shawna Cyphers Advanced Resources International U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Infrastructure for CCS August 20-22, 2013 Presentation Outline * Program Goals * Benefits Statement * Project Overview - Goals - Objectives * Technical Status * Accomplishments to Date * Summary * Appendix USDOE/NETL Program Goals * Support industry's ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent. * Develop and validate technologies to ensure 99 percent storage permanence. * Develop technologies to improve reservoir storage

109

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

University of Kansas Center for Research University of Kansas Center for Research Kansas Geological Survey U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 20-22, 2013 Presentation Outline * Benefits, objectives, overview * Methods * Background & setting * Technical status * Accomplishments * Summary Benefit to the Program * Program goal addressed: Develop technologies that will support the industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ± 30 percent. * Program goal addressed: This project will confirm - via a horizontal test boring - whether fracture attributes derived from 3-D seismic PSDM Volumetric Curvature (VC) processing are real. If

110

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mohammad Piri and Felipe Pereira Mohammad Piri and Felipe Pereira University of Wyoming U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 2013 2 Presentation Outline * Benefit to the Program * Project Overview * Technical Status o Experimentation: core-flooding and IFT/CA o Pore-scale modeling modeling * Accomplishments to Date * Summary University of Wyoming 3 Benefit to the Program * Program goal: o 'Develop technologies that will support industries' ability to predict CO 2 storage capacity in geologic formations to within ±30 percent.' * Benefits statement: o The research project is focused on performing reservoir conditions experiments to measure steady-state relative permeabilities,

111

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

fluid-driven fracture fluid-driven fracture DE-FE0002020 Joseph F. Labuz Civil Engineering University of Minnesota U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Presentation Outline * Benefits statement * Goal, objectives * Technical status: fracture code, experimental results (poro, AE) * Accomplishments * Summary 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Lateral displacement [mm] Load [kN] 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 AE events inelastic deformation peak 3 Benefit to the Program * Goal: develop technologies to predict CO2 storage capacity in geologic formations. * Benefits statement: develop 3D boundary element code & experimental techniques

112

Sandia National Labs: PCNSC: IBA Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Home Home About Us Departments Radiation, Nano Materials, & Interface Sciences > Radiation & Solid Interactions > Nanomaterials Sciences > Surface & Interface Sciences Semiconductor & Optical Sciences Energy Sciences Small Science Cluster Business Office News Partnering Research Ion Beam Analysis (IBA) Periodic Table (HTML) IBA Table (HTML) | IBA Table (135KB GIF) | IBA Table (1.2MB PDF) | IBA Table (33MB TIF) | Heavy Ion Backscattering Spectrometry (HIBS) | Virtual Lab Tour (6MB) The purpose of this table is to quickly give the visitor to this site information on the sensitivity, depth of analysis and depth resolution of most of the modern ion beam analysis techniques in a single easy to use format: a periodic table. Note that you can click on each panel of this

113

Energy Information Administration (EIA) - Supplement Tables - Supplemental  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6 6 Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2006 The AEO Supplemental tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (AEO2006) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 2003 to 2030. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2006, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2006 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of one hundred and seventeen tables is presented. The data for tables 10 and 20 match those published in AEO2006 Appendix tables A2 and A3, respectively. Forecasts for 2004-2006 may differ slightly from values published in the Short Term Energy Outlook, which are the official EIA short-term forecasts and are based on more current information than the AEO.

114

Energy Information Administration (EIA) - Supplement Tables - Supplemental  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2007 The AEO Supplemental tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2007 (AEO2007) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 2005 to 2030. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2007, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2007 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of one hundred and eighteen tables is presented. The data for tables 10 and 20 match those published in AEO2007 Appendix tables A2 and A3, respectively. Projections for 2006 and 2007 may differ slightly from values published in the Short Term Energy Outlook, which are the official EIA short-term projections and are based on more current information than the AEO.

115

Table 25  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

89 89 Table 25 Created on: 1/3/2014 3:10:33 PM Table 25. Natural gas home customer-weighted heating degree days, New England Middle Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic Month/Year/Type of data CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT NJ, NY, PA IL, IN, MI, OH, WI IA, KS, MN, MO, ND, NE, SD DE, FL, GA, MD, DC, NC, SC, VA, WV November Normal 702 665 758 841 442 2012 751 738 772 748 527 2013 756 730 823 868 511 % Diff (normal to 2013) 7.7 9.8 8.6 3.2 15.6 % Diff (2012 to 2013) 0.7 -1.1 6.6 16.0 -3.0 November to November Normal 702 665 758 841 442 2012 751 738 772 748 527 2013 756 730 823 868 511 % Diff (normal to 2013) 7.7 9.8 8.6 3.2 15.6 % Diff (2012 to 2013) 0.7 -1.1 6.6 16.0 -3.0

116

Report Title: The Fossil Fuel Industry in New Mexico: A Comprehensive Impact Analysis Type of Report: Technical Report  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Fuels 33 Summary Impacts 40 Works Cited 45 #12;3 List of Tables Table Title Page 1 Tax and Income Data0 Report Title: The Fossil Fuel Industry in New Mexico: A Comprehensive Impact Analysis Type AWARD Number: DE-NT0004397 Name and Address of Submitting Organization: Arrowhead Center New Mexico

Johnson, Eric E.

117

chapter 5. Detailed Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5. Detailed Tables 5. Detailed Tables Chapter 5. Detailed Tables The following tables present detailed characteristics of vehicles in the residential sector. Data are from the 1994 Residential Transportation Energy Consumption Survey. Table Organization The "Detailed Tables" section consists of three types of tables: (1) Tables of totals such as number of vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) or gallons consumed; (2) tables of per household statistics such as VMT per household; and (3) tables of per-vehicle statistics, such as vehicle fuel consumption per vehicle. The tables have been grouped together by specific topics such as model-year data or family-income data to facilitate finding related information. The Quick-Reference Guide to the detailed tables indicates major topics of each table.

118

Notices TABLE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2011 / Notices TABLE 2-NET BURDEN CHANGE-Continued 2011-2012 2012-2013 Change % Change Burden disposition Total Applicants .................................... 23,611,500 24,705,864 +1,094,364 +4.63 Net decrease in burden. The increase in applicants is offset by the results of the Department's simplification changes. This has created an over- all decrease in burden of 8.94% or 2,881,475 hours. Total Applicant Burden ......................... 32,239,328 29,357,853 ¥2,881,475 ¥8.94 Total Annual Responses ....................... 32,239,328 46,447,024 +14,207,696 +44.07 Cost for All Applicants .......................... $159,370.20 $234,804.24 $75,434.04 +47.33 The Department is proud that efforts to simplify the FAFSA submission

119

Table 4  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4. Mean Annual Electricity Expenditures for Lighting, by Number of 4. Mean Annual Electricity Expenditures for Lighting, by Number of Household Members by Number of Rooms, 1993 (Dollars) Number of Rooms Number of Household Members All Households One to Three Four Five Six Seven Eight or More RSE Column Factors: 0.5 1.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 RSE Row Factors All Households................................... 83 49 63 76 87 104 124 2.34 One..................................................... 55 44 51 54 69 78 87 5.33 Two..................................................... 80 56 63 77 82 96 107 3.38 Three.................................................. 92 60 73 82 95 97 131 4.75 Four.................................................... 106 64 78 93 96 124 134 4.53 Five or More....................................... 112 70 83 98 99 117 150 5.89 Notes: -- To obtain the RSE percentage for any table cell, multiply the

120

EIA - Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2013 Data Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2013 (See release cycle changes) | correction | full 2013 (See release cycle changes) | correction | full report Overview Data Reference Case Side Cases Interactive Table Viewer Topics Source Oil/Liquids Natural Gas Coal Electricity Renewable/Alternative Nuclear Sector Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Energy Demand Other Emissions Prices Macroeconomic International Efficiency Publication Chapter Market Trends Issues in Focus Legislation & Regulations Comparison Appendices View All Filter By Source Oil Natural Gas Coal Electricity Renewable/Alternative Nuclear Sector Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Other Topics Emissions Prices Macroeconomic International Data TablesAll Tables Reference case summary & detailed tables... + EXPAND ALL Summary Case Tables additional formats Table 1. Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary XLS

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

EIA - Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Supplemental Tables to the AEO 2008 Supplemental Tables to the AEO 2008 Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2008 The AEO Supplemental tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (AEO2008) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 2005 to 2030. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2008, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2008 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of one hundred and seventeen tables are presented. The data for tables 10 and 20 match those published in AEO2008 Appendix tables A2 and A3, respectively. Projections for 2007 and 2008 may differ slightly from values published in the Short Term Energy Outlook, which are the official EIA short-term projections and are based on more current information than the AEO.

122

Bubble formation in reservoir fluids at low supersaturations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

af Standing on Bubble Formation at R psi Supersaturation Average Bubble Frequency Curves . . ~, . . . 26 Table Title Gas Composition . 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Tests fox Bubble Frequency for Group A Tests for Bubble Frequency fox Group B Tests... fox Bubble Frequency for Gra?y C 3P 33 35 Tho ob)cot cf the ~ rcport'. " in this thesis v. to detcssdne the emerge ~e nqnire6 for She initicl gas babble te fern in . ". crude oi1~ore system~ and to det. caine ~~t sunerssturcticn could bo rec...

Wieland, Denton R

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

123

CARINA Data Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cruise Summary Table and Data Cruise Summary Table and Data Users are requested to report any data or metadata errors in the CARINA cruise files to CDIAC. Parameter units in all CARINA data files are in CCHDO exchange format. No Cruise Namea (Alias) Areab Number of Stations Datec Ship Chief Scientist Carbon PI Oxygen Nutrients TCO2d TALK pCO2e pHf CFC Other Measurements Data Files 1 06AQ19920929g (06ANTX_6) (See map) 2 118 9/29-11/30/1992 Polarstern V. Smetacek M. Stoll, J. Rommets, H. De Baar, D. Bakker 62 114h 53 54i U C 0 Choloroa,b Fluorescence, NH4 Data Files (Metadata) 2 06AQ19930806 (06ARKIX_4) (See map) 4 64 8/6-10/5/1993 Polarstern D.K. Fütterer L. Anderson 64 63 63j, bb 0 0 0 59he 3H, 3He, 18O, 14C, 85Kr, Bak Data Files

124

Flyer, Title VI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Titles VI and IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance.

125

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Status Update: EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J Section 999 - Project NT42677, "Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Program Roy Long Technology Manager, EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999 2 UDAC Update Presentation Outline * Consortium Accomplishments * UDW Program RFP Summary - 2007 - 2008 * 2009 Funding Disbursement History * 2009 Program / Process Enhancements - Contractual / GAO - Risk Mitigation / Management 3 Overall: * 3 Annual Plans completed * 15 solicitations released under 2007 R&D funding * 43 projects selected for award under 2007 solicitations - 17 Ultra-Deepwater projects - 19 Unconventional Resources projects - 7 Small Producers projects Program Accomplishments Solicitations & Awards 4 * Current Status:

126

Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Recertification Application 2014 DOE/WIPP 14-3503 Section 23-201423-iii Table of Contents 23.0 Models and Computer Isolation Pilot Plant Models and Computer Codes (40 CFR � 194.23) United States Department of Energy Waste 2014 Models and Computer Codes (40 CFR � 194.23) #12;Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance

127

Ris Ris-M-GSZJ Title and authors)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Risø Risø-M-GSZJ Title and authors) External Radiation Exposure Associated with Uranium Nielsen * . +) The Geological Survey of Greenland 11 pages + 3 tables + 2 illustrations Date February 19 radia- tion levels because of extensive uranium and thorium mineralizations. The measuring programme

128

Federal operating permits program under Title V of the Clean Air Act. Final report  

SciTech Connect

;Table of Contents: Introduction; Transition Between Parts 70 and 71; Title V Obligations and Applicability; Synthetic Minors, Potential to Emit, and Transition Policy; Permit Application Step and Content; Flexible Permit Approaches; Hazardous Air Pollution Program Requirements for Title V; Information Sources; Appendix A. EPA Memoranda; and Appendix B. Seminar Overhead Transparencies.

NONE

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Supplement Tables - Supplemental Data  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

December 22, 2000 (Next Release: December, 2001) Related Links Annual Energy Outlook 2001 Assumptions to the AEO2001 NEMS Conference Contacts Forecast Homepage EIA Homepage AEO Supplement Reference Case Forecast (1999-2020) (HTML) Table 1. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (New England) Table 2. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (Middle Atlantic) Table 3. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (East North Central) Table 4. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (West North Central) Table 5. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (South Atlantic) Table 6. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (East South Central) Table 7. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (West South Central) Table 8. Energy Consumption by Source and Sector (Mountain)

130

EIA - Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2012 Data Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2 2 Release Date: June 25, 2012 | Next Early Release Date: December 5, 2012 | Report Number: DOE/EIA-0383(2012) Overview Data Reference Case Side Cases Interactive Table Viewer Topics Source Oil/Liquids Natural Gas Coal Electricity Renewable/Alternative Nuclear Sector Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Energy Demand Other Emissions Prices Macroeconomic International Efficiency Publication Chapter Executive Summary Market Trends Issues in Focus Legislation & Regulations Comparison Appendices View All Filter By Source Oil Natural Gas Coal Electricity Renewable/Alternative Nuclear Sector Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Other Topics Emissions Prices Macroeconomic International Data TablesAll Tables Reference case summary & detailed tables... + EXPAND ALL Summary Case Tables Additional Formats

131

FY 2005 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) Table of Contents Summary...................................................................................................... 1 Mandatory Funding....................................................................................... 3 Energy Supply.............................................................................................. 4 Non-Defense site acceleration completion................................................... 6 Uranium enrichment D&D fund.................................................................... 6 Non-Defense environmental services.......................................................... 6 Science.........................................................................................................

132

Exhibit C Table of Contents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Exhibit C Schedules and Lists Exhibit C Schedules and Lists Dated 5-20-13 Subcontract No. 241314 Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT "C" SCHEDULES AND LISTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Form Title A Schedule of Quantities and Prices B Milestone and Payment Schedule C Lower-Tier Subcontractor and Vendor List Exhibit C Schedules and Lists Dated 5-20-13 Subcontract No. 241314 Page 2 of 5 EXHIBIT "C" FORM A SCHEDULE OF QUANTITIES AND PRICES NOTE: This Exhibit "C" Form A is part of the model subcontract for Trinity and is provided to Offerors for informational purposes only. It is not intended that this form be returned with the Offeror's proposal. 1.0 WORK TO BE PERFORMED Work shall be performed strictly in accordance with requirements of the Subcontract

133

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title IX, Subtitle J (EPAct Title IX, Subtitle J (EPAct 2005) Complementary Program - Office of Research and Development September 2008 2 3 Complementary Program NETL - ORD * Areas of research - Drilling Under Extreme Conditions - Environmental Impacts of Oil and Gas - Enhanced and Unconventional Oil Recovery - Resource Assessment * Institute for Advanced Energy Solutions - West Virginia University, Carnegie-Mellon University, and University of Pittsburgh * Penn State University and Oregon State University 4 Drilling Under Extreme Conditions * Ultra-deep single cutter drilling simulator - Recreates bottom-hole drilling environment of ultra-deep wells (30,000 psi and 481 o F) - Delivered to NETL later this year - Operates with real drilling fluids - X-ray video system images cuttings - Verify the results of the full bit

134

Global Environmental Course Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Department Global Environmental Studies Room Course Title Frontier of Sustainability Science Instructor Akihisa MORI, Global Environmental Studies Satoshi KONISHI, Institute of Advanced consisting from a variety of academic field, including philosophy, politics, economics, energy, architecture

Takada, Shoji

135

Event Checklist Event Title: _____________________________________________________________  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

:_____________________ __Alcohol (Approval to serve __) __Type of bar __Bartender provided __Water at podium, head table __Special count TRANSPORTATION & PARKING: A/V & SOUND REQUIREMENTS: __Parking reserved __Power source __Attendant accommodations __Logistics or presentation __Rental car __Transportation __Security Special Needs Accommodations

Almor, Amit

136

Main Title 32pt  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Rev ABQ Academy SAND2010-1957P 2010 March 31 28 Semiconductor Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Photons The periodic table, courtesy of BBS. http:www.bbc.co.uk...

137

EIA - Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Analysis > Supplemental Tables to the AEO 2009 Analysis > Supplemental Tables to the AEO 2009 Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009 The Early Release for next year's Annual Energy Outlook will be presented at the John Hopkins Kenney Auditorium on December 14th The AEO Supplemental tables were generated for the reference case of the Annual Energy Outlook 2009 (AEO2009) using the National Energy Modeling System, a computer-based model which produces annual projections of energy markets for 2006 to 2030. Most of the tables were not published in the AEO2009, but contain regional and other more detailed projections underlying the AEO2009 projections. The files containing these tables are in spreadsheet format. A total of one hundred and twenty-eight tables are presented.

138

FY 2005 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Congressional Budget Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Preliminary Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropria ted as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress.

139

Common Formative Assessments Developed Through Professional Learning Communities (PLCs): A Case Study to Analyze the Alignment of Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction in a Math PLC at a Title I Middle School in the Southern United States  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the collaborative processes used by five sixth grade math teachers and one instructional coach (IC) at a Title I middle in the Southern United States to align the rigor between learning objectives, PLC-developed CFAs and classroom instruction. Of the teachers...

Hill, Tory C

2013-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

140

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wellbores and Drilling Wellbores and Drilling Brian Strazisar NETL Title, Date ‹#› Technology or Capability Overview * 3 primary efforts related to wellbore cement - Risk of wellbore leakage in CO 2 storage/EOR - Stability of foamed cements in deep offshore wells - Shallow gas migration in shale gas wells * Extreme Drilling Laboratory (XDL) - NETL Facility to study drilling processes under conditions that exist at extreme depths ‹#› CO 2 and Wellbore Leakage Risk * Early NETL work defined mechanism for chemical reaction between CO 2 and wellbore cement. * Degradation of cement determined to be too slow to impact well integrity in the absence of preexisting flow paths CaCO 3(s) barrier (2) Degraded Zone (3) Propagation of Fronts Ca(OH) 2 depleted zone (1)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Track 1A: Oil & Gas Production Track 1A: Oil & Gas Production and Utilization-Overview George Guthrie Office of Research and Development National Energy Technology Laboratory Title, Date ‹#› The Need: Energy portfolio is projected to remain anchored by fossil. Sources: U.S. data from EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2011; World data from IEA, World Energy Outlook 2010, Current Policies Scenario 79% Fossil Energy 78% Fossil Energy 84% Fossil Energy 81% Fossil Energy * Primarily traditional biomass, wood, and waste. Gas 24% Coal 21% Oil 33% Nuclear 8% Renewables 14% Gas 24% Coal 22% Oil 37% Nuclear 8% Renewables 8% Gas 21% Coal 27% Oil 33% Nuclear 6% Renewables* 13% Gas 22% Coal 29% Oil 28% Nuclear 8% Renewables* 15% + 14% + 47% Energy Demand 2008 Energy Demand 2035 World

142

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UDAC Recommendations UDAC Recommendations Roy Long Technology Manager, EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999 2 Overview of UDAC 2009 Recommendations Recommendation Areas * R&D Program Focus * Program Scope * Process * Program Progress & Value * Societal Impact 3 R&D Program Focus Area * Safety and environmental projects should be considered as separate topics. * Safety and environmental projects should be identified with specific phases of the exploration and production lifecycle. * The project impact assessment utilized in the project selection process should be made public and available to the UDAC. * Fund projects which address the overall safety impact of UDW activity. * Fund projects which address the overall environmental impact of UDW activity. * The metocean program should be strengthened regarding wind and

143

Two Line Subject Title One Line Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Materials: Materials: Capabilities and Successes David Luebke Carbon Capture Technical Coordinator, NETL Energy and Innovation Conference, November 28, 2012 ‹#› What are soft materials? Ionic Liquids Metal-Organic Frameworks Small Pores Large Pores Flexible Pores Rigid Pores Planar Metal-Based Polymeric Network M[Ni(CN) 4 ] n Sorbent pilot unit developed by ADA, Inc. Polymers and Derivatives Composites ‹#› What does the NETL-RUA bring to the table? ‹#› Unrivaled Understanding of Energy Applications A Century of Energy Research Energy Technology Expertise Coal Handling Gasifier Air Separation Unit Steam Generation Heat Recovery Steam Turbine Gas Turbine Syngas Cooling Process Condensate Treatment Acid gas Cleaning & Sulfur Recovery CO 2 Capture H 2 Production H 2 /CO Ratio

144

Louisiana Block Grant Tables | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Louisiana Block Grant Tables Louisiana Block Grant Tables This table details funding for state, city, and county governments in the state of Louisiana. Louisiana Block Grant Tables...

145

Mississippi Block Grant Tables | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mississippi Block Grant Tables Mississippi Block Grant Tables A table describing where state funding is being distributed Mississippi Block Grant Tables More Documents &...

146

Project Year Project Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

operators, matrix indexing, vector computations, loops, functions, and plotting graphs, among others basic arithmetic operators, matrix indexing, and vector computations in MATLAB. After creatingProject Year 2011-2012 Project Title Online Tutorial for MATLAB Project Team Eileen Haase, Whiting

Gray, Jeffrey J.

147

Project Year Project Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that incorporate video taped procedures for student preview. Solution This project will create videos for more to study the procedure and techniques before coming to class. Our previous fellowship project addressedProject Year 2009 Project Title Enhancing Biology Laboratory Preparation through Video

Gray, Jeffrey J.

148

Project Year Project Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Project Year 2011-2012 Project Title Using M-Health and GIS Technology in the Field to Improve into teams and having each team use a different m-health data collection tool (e.g., cellular phones, smart health patterns. The Tech Fellow, Jacqueline Ferguson, will assist in creating an m-health project

Gray, Jeffrey J.

149

Project Year Project Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the cost of the project to labor only. The efficacy of the examples will be assessed through their useProject Year 2012-2013 Project Title Sight-Reading at the Piano Project Team Ken Johansen, Peabody) Faculty Statement The goal of this project is to create a bank of practice exercises that student pianists

Gray, Jeffrey J.

150

Project Year Project Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Project Year 2013-2014 Project Title German Online Placement Exam Project Team Deborah Mifflin to increased cost. As well, it lacked listening comprehension, writing and speaking components providing support, we will use Blackboard for this project. The creation will require numerous steps

Gray, Jeffrey J.

151

2003 CBECS RSE Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003rsetables_files/plainlink.css" cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003rsetables_files/plainlink.css" type=text/css rel=stylesheet> Home > Households, Buildings & Industry > Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) > 2003 Detailed Tables > RSE Tables 2003 CBECS Relative Standard Error (RSE) Tables Released: Dec 2006 Next CBECS will be conducted in 2007 Standard error is a measure of the reliability or precision of the survey statistic. The value for the standard error can be used to construct confidence intervals and to perform hypothesis tests by standard statistical methods. Relative Standard Error (RSE) is defined as the standard error (square root of the variance) of a survey estimate, divided by the survey estimate and multiplied by 100. (More information on RSEs)

152

CBECS Buildings Characteristics --Revised Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Buildings Use Tables Buildings Use Tables (24 pages, 129 kb) CONTENTS PAGES Table 12. Employment Size Category, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 13. Employment Size Category, Floorspace, 1995 Table 14. Weekly Operating Hours, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 15. Weekly Operating Hours, Floorspace, 1995 Table 16. Occupancy of Nongovernment-Owned and Government-Owned Buildings, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 17. Occupancy of Nongovernment-Owned and Government-Owned Buildings, Floorspace, 1995 These data are from the 1995 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), a national probability sample survey of commercial buildings sponsored by the Energy Information Administration, that provides information on the use of energy in commercial buildings in the

153

No Slide Title | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

No Slide Title No Slide Title No Slide Title More Documents & Publications Slide 1 Earned Value Management System (EVMS) and Project Analysis Standard Operating Procedure (EPASOP)-...

154

ARM - Instrument Location Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

govInstrumentsLocation Table govInstrumentsLocation Table Instruments Location Table Contacts Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Instrument Locations Site abbreviations explained in the key. Instrument Name Abbreviation NSA SGP TWP AMF C1 C2 EF BF CF EF IF C1 C2 C3 EF IF Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor ACSM Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer AERI Aethalometer AETH Ameriflux Measurement Component AMC Aerosol Observing System AOS Meteorological Measurements associated with the Aerosol Observing System AOSMET Broadband Radiometer Station BRS

155

Report Title: Mapping  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title: Title: Mapping of Reservoir Properties and Facies Through Integration of Static and Dynamic Data Report Type: Final Technical Report Reporting Period Start Date: October 1, 2000 Reporting Period End Date: September 30, 2004 Principal Authors: Albert C. Reynolds, Dean S. Oliver, Yannong Dong, Ning Liu, Guohua Gao, Fengjun Zhang & Ruijian Li Date Report Issued: December 2004 DOE Award Number: DE-FC26-00BC15309 Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Tulsa 600 South College Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product,

156

FY 2009 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Preliminary February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request State Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper State Index Page Number FY 2009 Congressional Budget 1/30/2008 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 9:01:45AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2007 Appropriation FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Request State Table 1 1 $27,588

157

FY 2005 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Management, Budget Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 State Tables State Tables Preliminary Preliminary Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 State Tables State Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Preliminary Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number

158

FY 2010 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Preliminary May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request State Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper State Index Page Number FY 2010 Congressional Budget 5/4/2009 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 2:13:22PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Appropriation FY 2010 Request State Table 1 1 $46,946 $48,781 $38,844 Alabama 2 $6,569

159

FY 2006 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 State Tables Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2006 Congressional Budget 1/27/2005 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 3:32:58PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2004 Comp/Approp FY 2005 Comp/Approp FY 2006 Request State Table

160

FY 2010 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2010 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 2:08:56PM Department Of Energy 5/4/2009 Page Number FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Appropriation FY 2010 Request Laboratory Table 1 1 $1,200

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Table of Contents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

E N N E E R R A A L L Semiannual Report toCongress DOEIG-0065 April 1 - September 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS From the Desk of the Inspector General ......

162

FY 2008 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Table State Table Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer State Table Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2008 Congressional Budget 2/1/2007 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 6:53:08AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request FY 2008 Request State Table 1 1 $28,332 $30,341

163

Environmental Assessment Addendum For the Proposed Title Transfer of Parcel ED-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-A 3-A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM FOR THE PROPOSED TITLE TRANSFER OF PARCEL ED-1 April 2003 U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Oak Ridge, Tennessee 02-088(doc)/040203 DOE/EA-1113-A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM FOR THE PROPOSED TITLE TRANSFER OF PARCEL ED-1 Date Issued-April 2003 U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations 02-088(doc)/040203 iii CONTENTS FIGURES..................................................................................................................................................... iv TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... iv

164

Title of Presentation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title of Presentation Title of Presentation More Documents & Publications Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems 2010 Peer Review Presentations - Software Engineering...

165

Title Line 2 Commercialization at the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-exclusive or exclusive license (royalty free or royalty bearing) ­ Researchers sign acknowledgment #12;Title Title Line 2

Czarnecki, Krzysztof

166

PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of Seed Boot and Furrow Opener Configurations for Optimizing Seed and Fertilizer Placement in Simultaneous, Single-Pass Operations with Air Drills under  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Hr GRC 3 PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of Seed Boot and Furrow Opener Configurations for Optimizing-seeded into spring wheat stubble at Havre in 2002 is presented in Table 1. The `Morris Gumbo Boot' was included

Maxwell, Bruce D.

167

Presentation title goes here  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Future of DR Future of DR March 3, 2011 Sila Kiliccote, Mary Ann Piette, Dave Watson, Rish Ghatikar Deputy, DRRC Program Manager, LBNL SKiliccote@lbl.gov 2 Presentation Overview * Trends * Policy * Technology * Implementations * Load As Resource in Ancillary Services Markets * Future directions towards responsive buildings 3 Trends Policy Dynamic Rates - Large C&I, residential, small commercial Codes and Standards -Title 24, US Green Building Council's LEED Credits Smart Grid Standards effort Ancillary Services Technology Integration of Renewables Energy Storage Technologies - Can DR replace storage? PHEVs and EVs Implementation Linking Energy Efficiency and DR Utility Implementations Smart Grid Investment and Demonstration Grants 4 Demand Side Management and Automated DR Future

168

1991 Tables and Spreadsheets and Answers to Frequently Asked MECS Questions  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Tables and Spreadsheets Tables and Spreadsheets 1991 Tables and Spreadsheets Answers to Frequently Asked MECS Questions ( All tables are accessible in PDF and/or Lotus Format) Energy Consumption Q: In 1991, how much energy did manufactures consume for fuel or non-fuel purposes? A: If you would like to review national and regional statistics by SIC in physical units, please click Table A1 (part 1); for common units, please click Table A1 (part 2); and for review by manufacturing economic characteristics, such as employment and value of shipments, please click onTable A9; Table A30 or Table A33. mecs01a.xls (Table A1, Part 1) mecs01b.xls (Table A1, Part 2) mecs09.xls (Table A9) mecs30.xls (Table A30) mecs33.xls (Table A33) Q: In 1991, how much energy did manufactures consume for fuel purposes (i.e., to produce heat, power, and generate electricity)?

169

FY 2011 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0054 March 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer State Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0054 State Index Page Number FY 2011 Congressional Budget 1/29/2010 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 6:34:40AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2009 Appropriation

170

FY 2007 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory tables Laboratory tables preliminary Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory tables preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2007 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 12:10:40PM Department Of Energy 1/31/2006 Page Number FY 2005 Appropriation FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007

171

FY 2011 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0055 March 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0055 Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2011 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 6:24:57AM Department Of Energy 1/29/2010 Page

172

FY 2008 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Table Laboratory Table Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory Table Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2008 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 6:51:02AM Department Of Energy 2/1/2007 Page Number FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request FY 2008 Request

173

FY 2006 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 Laboratory Tables Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2006 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 3:43:16PM Department Of Energy 1/27/2005 Page Number FY 2004 Comp/Approp FY 2005 Comp/Approp

174

Fy 2009 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2009 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 8:59:25AM Department Of Energy 1/30/2008 Page Number FY 2007 Appropriation FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009

175

FY 2013 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Current Enacted Congressional Approp. Approp. * Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy........................................ 1,771,721 1,809,638 2,337,000 +527,362 +29.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability......................................... 138,170 139,103 143,015 +3,912 +2.8% Nuclear energy................................................................................ 717,817 765,391 770,445 +5,054 +0.7% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology.................................................................. -16,500 -- --

176

FY 2009 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................... -- 1,722,407 1,255,393 -467,014 -27.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................... -- 138,556 134,000 -4,556 -3.3% Nuclear energy................................................................. -- 961,665 853,644 -108,021 -11.2% Legacy management........................................................ -- 33,872 -- -33,872 -100.0% Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance..........................................

177

Policy Procedure Administrative Directive Title: _____________________________________  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Policy ­ Procedure ­ Administrative Directive Title: _____________________________________ Policy-President _____________ See also: Related Policies, Procedures and Agreements: Relevant Legislation and Regulations: ____________________________________________________________________________ Background and Purpose: ____________________________________________________________________________ Policy

Northern British Columbia, University of

178

Table of Contents Page i Table of Contents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Table of Contents Page i Table of Contents 4. Building HVAC Requirements ....................................................................................1 4.1.2 What's New for the 2013 Standards.............................................................................................3 4.1.4 California Appliance Standards and Equipment Certification

179

Title 44 Excerpts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 Excerpts 4 Excerpts The United States Code - Title 44 PUBLIC PRINTING AND DOCUMENTS And Miscellaneous Statutes Identify the Authority of the Joint Committee on Printing 1997 EDITION CHAPTER 5 - PRODUCTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PRINTING AND BINDING Section 501. Government printing, and blank-book work for Congress, the Executive Office, the Judiciary, other than the Supreme Court of the United States, and every executive department, independent office and establishment of the Government, shall be done at the Government Printing Office, except- (1) classes of work the Joint Committee on Printing considers to be urgent or necessary to have done elsewhere; and (2) printing in field printing plants operated by an executive department, independent office of establishment, and the procurement of printing by an executive department,

180

No Slide Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 * www.tda.com Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 * www.tda.com A Low Cost, High Capacity Regenerable Sorbent for Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture Contract No: DE-FE0000469 Principal Investigator Gökhan Alptekin, PhD DOE Project Manager Ms. Sara Zenner Project Kick-off Meeting NETL, Pittsburgh, PA November 12, 2009 TDA R e s e a r c h 2  Privately Owned / Began operations in 1987  ~13 million revenue in 2009  84 full-time technical staff  Primarily chemists and engineers, more than half with advanced degrees (26 PhDs) TDA Research, Inc. Wheat Ridge Facility Golden Facility 12345-12355 W 52 nd Avenue 22,000 ft 2 offices and labs Synthetic Chemistry, Catalyst/Sorbent Synthesis and Testing, Machine and Electronics Shops, SEM, TOF Mass Spec 4663 Table Mountain Drive 27,000 ft 2 offices and labs

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Cost Recovery Charge (CRC) Calculation Tables  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Cost Recovery Charge (CRC) Calculation Table Updated: October 6, 2014 FY 2016 September 2014 CRC Calculation Table (pdf) Final FY 2015 CRC Letter & Table (pdf) Note: The Cost...

182

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

/2011 /2011 Decades of Discovery Decades of Discovery Page 2 6/1/2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 2 BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES .................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Adenosine Triphosphate: The Energy Currency of Life .............................................. 7 2.2 Making Better Catalysts .............................................................................................. 8 2.3 Understanding Chemical Reactions............................................................................ 9 2.4 New Types of Superconductors ................................................................................ 10

183

Has operating permitting really changed with Title V? Reflecting on the Title V operating permit program  

SciTech Connect

Now that some state regulatory agencies are reviewing Title V permit applications and issuing permits, evaluation of the process can be made in comparison with the original goals of the Title V permitting program. In addition, assessment of the terms and conditions that are being incorporated into permits, the nature of draft permits that are issued to facilities for comment, and the extent and type of negotiation that have been conducted with agencies to develop successful Title V permits, will be helpful for facilities that are currently undergoing application review. In working with a Fortune 500 surface coating company, fourteen Title V permit applications were developed and submitted for plants located in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Illinois, Georgia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Indiana and southern California. Draft permits have been issued for several of the plants, and differences in the terms and conditions, testing requirements, and permit format and structure have been noted between states. One of the issued permits required modification, and the process was one of the first for this state agency.

Goldstein, D.R.; Cressman, A.W.

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Title IX | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IX IX Title IX Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in all educational programs and activities of institutions that receive federal financial assistance. The law states, in part, that: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Click here to learn more: 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a) The Office of Civil Rights is responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance with Title IX, investigating Title IX-related complaints, and providing technical assistance related to Title IX to recipients of Department of Energy financial assistance.

185

FY 2006 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply Operation and maintenance................................................. 787,941 909,903 862,499 -47,404 -5.2% Construction......................................................................... 6,956 22,416 40,175 17,759 +79.2% Total, Energy supply................................................................ 794,897 932,319 902,674 -29,645 -3.2% Non-Defense site acceleration completion............................. 167,272 157,316 172,400 15,084 +9.6%

186

FY 2013 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables y Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0078 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables P li i Preliminary h b d i d i hi d h l l f b d h i f h The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2013 Congressional Budget

187

FY 2010 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Recovery Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 1,704,112 2,178,540 16,800,000 2,318,602 +140,062 +6.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 136,170 137,000 4,500,000 208,008 +71,008 +51.8% Nuclear energy.............................................................................. 960,903 792,000 -- 761,274 -30,726 -3.9% Legacy management..................................................................... 33,872 -- -- --

188

FY 2012 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request State Tables P li i Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0066 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request State Tables P li i Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled

189

FY 2012 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2Statistical Table by Appropriation 2Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Congressional Annualized Congressional Approp. Request CR Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 2,216,392 2,355,473 2,242,500 3,200,053 +983,661 +44.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 168,484 185,930 171,982 237,717 +69,233 +41.1% Nuclear energy............................................................................. 774,578 824,052 786,637 754,028 -20,550 -2.7% Fossil energy programs Fossil energy research and development................................... 659,770 586,583 672,383 452,975

190

FY 2007 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance............................................ 1,779,399 1,791,372 1,917,331 +125,959 +7.0% Construction................................................................... 22,416 21,255 6,030 -15,225 -71.6% Total, Energy supply and conservation.............................. 1,801,815 1,812,627 1,923,361 +110,734 +6.1% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................... -160,000 -20,000 -- +20,000 +100.0% Fossil energy research and development.......................

191

FY 2012 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables y Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0065 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables P li i Preliminary h b d i d i hi d h l l f b d h i f h The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2012 Congressional Budget

192

FY 2008 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Congressional Congressional Approp. Request Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance........................................... 1,781,242 1,917,331 2,187,943 +270,612 +14.1% Construction.................................................................... 31,155 6,030 -- -6,030 -100.0% Total, Energy supply and conservation............................. 1,812,397 1,923,361 2,187,943 +264,582 +13.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology.................................................... -20,000 -- -58,000 -58,000 N/A Fossil energy research and development......................

193

Table of Contents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMUNICATIONS REQUIREMENTS COMMUNICATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES October 5, 2010 i Table of Contents I. Introduction and Executive Summary.......................................................... 1 a. Overview of Smart Grid Benefits and Communications Needs................. 2 b. Summary of Recommendations .................................................................... 5 II. Federal Government Smart Grid Initiatives ................................................ 7 a. DOE Request for Information ....................................................................... 7 b. Other Federal Government Smart Grid Initiatives .................................... 9 III. Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Applications .................. 11 a. Advanced Metering Infrastructure ............................................................12

194

Microsoft Word - 2010 Annual Plan - 12-3-09 - OMB Cleared-glc tables.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 163 EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 163 December 2009 EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 164 December 2009 EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 165 December 2009 Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Comments and Recommendations 2010 Annual Plan OCTOBER 2009 Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Report EPAct 2005 Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999B(e) - 2010 Annual Plan 166 December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................3 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION HIGHLIGHTS......................5

195

THERMODYNAMIC TABLES FOR NUCLEAR WASTE ISOLATION, V.1: AQUEOUSSOLUTIONS DATABASE  

SciTech Connect

Tables of consistent thermodynamic property values for nuclear waste isolation are given. The tables include critically assessed values for Gibbs energy of formation. enthalpy of formation, entropy and heat capacity for minerals; solids; aqueous ions; ion pairs and complex ions of selected actinide and fission decay products at 25{sup o}C and zero ionic strength. These intrinsic data are used to calculate equilibrium constants and standard potentials which are compared with typical experimental measurements and other work. Recommendations for additional research are given.

Phillips, S.L.; Hale, F.V.; Silvester, L.F.

1988-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

CBECS Buildings Characteristics --Revised Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Geographic Location Tables Geographic Location Tables (24 pages, 136kb) CONTENTS PAGES Table 3. Census Region, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 Table 4. Census Region and Division, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 5. Census Region and Division, Floorspace, 1995 Table 6. Climate Zone, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 Table 7. Metropolitan Status, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 These data are from the 1995 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), a national probability sample survey of commercial buildings sponsored by the Energy Information Administration, that provides information on the use of energy in commercial buildings in the United States. The 1995 CBECS was the sixth survey in a series begun in 1979. The data were collected from a sample of 6,639 buildings representing 4.6 million commercial buildings

197

2003 CBECS Detailed Tables: Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2003 Detailed Tables 2003 Detailed Tables 2003 CBECS Detailed Tables most recent available Released: September 2008 Building Characteristics | Consumption & Expenditures | End-Use Consumption In the 2003 CBECS, the survey procedures for strip shopping centers and enclosed malls ("mall buildings") were changed from those used in previous surveys, and, as a result, mall buildings are now excluded from most of the 2003 CBECS tables. Therefore, some data in the majority of the tables are not directly comparable with previous CBECS tables, all of which included mall buildings. Some numbers in the 2003 tables will be slightly lower than earlier surveys since the 2003 figures do not include mall buildings. See "Change in Data Collection Procedures for Malls" for a more detailed explanation.

198

TABLE OF CONTENTS Risk Analysis Methods Adapted to Computer Security (Revised Paper)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Security e Espionage e Terrorism e Nuclear Theft Environmental Risk Computer Reliability Health & Safety#12;TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Risk Analysis Methods Adapted to Computer Security (Revised Security Lattice Management c. T. Fe~guson & c. B. Murphy . . . · · . . . 15 Gould Computer Systems

199

Title VI | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VI VI Title VI Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance. The law states, in part, that: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The Office of Civil Rights is responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance with Title VI, investigating Title VI-related complaints, and providing technical assistance to recipients of Department of Energy financial assistance. The Department has promulgated regulations that

200

Session Title Climate Smart Agriculture  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Session Title Climate Smart Agriculture Session Date Khosla (moderator) Professor, Soil and Crop Sciences College of Agricultural Climate Smart Agriculture is a multi-disciplinary approach to practice agriculture

Barnes, Elizabeth A.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Table of Contents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NT0005638 NT0005638 Cruise Report 1-19 July 2009 HYFLUX Sea Truth Cruise Northern Gulf of Mexico Submitted by: Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Dr. Corpus Christi, TX 78412 Principal Authors: Ian R. MacDonald and Thomas Naehr Prepared for: United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory October 30, 2009 Office of Fossil Energy HYFLUX Seatruth Cruise Report -1- Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Table of Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................. 2 Participating Organizations ................................................................................................. 3 Major Equipment ................................................................................................................ 4

202

Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation - Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Forecast Evaluation Table 2. Total Energy Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 3. Total Petroleum Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 4. Total Natural Gas Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 5. Total Coal Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 6. Total Electricity Sales, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 7. Crude Oil Production, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 8. Natural Gas Production, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 9. Coal Production, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 10. Net Petroleum Imports, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 11. Net Natural Gas Imports, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 12. Net Coal Exports, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 13. World Oil Prices, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 14. Natural Gas Wellhead Prices, Actual vs. Forecasts Table 15. Coal Prices to Electric Utilities, Actual vs. Forecasts

203

CBECS Buildings Characteristics --Revised Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Conservation Tables Conservation Tables (16 pages, 86 kb) CONTENTS PAGES Table 41. Energy Conservation Features, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 Table 42. Building Shell Conservation Features, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 43. Building Shell Conservation Features, Floorspace, 1995 Table 44. Reduction in Equipment Use During Off Hours, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 These data are from the 1995 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), a national probability sample survey of commercial buildings sponsored by the Energy Information Administration, that provides information on the use of energy in commercial buildings in the United States. The 1995 CBECS was the sixth survey in a series begun in 1979. The data were collected from a sample of 6,639 buildings representing 4.6 million commercial buildings

204

CBECS Buildings Characteristics --Revised Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Structure Tables Structure Tables (16 pages, 93 kb) CONTENTS PAGES Table 8. Building Size, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 9. Building Size, Floorspace, 1995 Table 10. Year Constructed, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 11. Year Constructed, Floorspace, 1995 These data are from the 1995 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), a national probability sample survey of commercial buildings sponsored by the Energy Information Administration, that provides information on the use of energy in commercial buildings in the United States. The 1995 CBECS was the sixth survey in a series begun in 1979. The data were collected from a sample of 6,639 buildings representing 4.6 million commercial buildings and 58.8 billion square feet of commercial floorspace in the U.S. The 1995 data are available for the four Census

205

Main Title 32pt  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Peer Review November 2 - 4, 2010 Washington, DC Presented by: Tom Hund, and Wes Baca Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM (505) 844-8627 tdhund@sandia.gov Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Funded by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) Historical Sandia Battery Testing Introduction (2002 - 2010) ESMA Supercapacitors Maxwell Supercaps NessCap Supercaps East Penn lead-acid/carbon (ALABC) Sandia Battery Testing Introduction FY-10 Testing: * The large format (1,000 Ah) Furukawa and East Penn Ultrabattery

206

Microsoft Word - MVA - Table.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Projects and Congressional Districts Projects and Congressional Districts Title Performer Congressional District A Sea Floor Gravity Survey of the Sleipner Field to Monitor CO 2 Migration SCRIPPS (Scripps Institute of Oceanography) CA53 Advanced Technologies for Monitoring CO 2 Saturation and Pore Pressure in Geologic Formations: Linking the Chemical and Physical Effects to Elastic and Transport Properties Stanford University CA14 Basic Science of Retention Issues, Risk Assessment & Measurement, Monitoring, & Verification for Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Montana State University MT01 Brookhaven National Laboratory - New Approach for Long-Term Monitoring of CO 2 Leaks from Geologic Sequestratation Brookhaven National Laboratory NY01 Combining Space Geodesy, Seismology, and Geochemistry for Monitoring,

207

Annual Poster Session 2009 Titles and Presenters  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Kolli Title: Genetic Variation in the Lecane luna from Populations in the Chihuahua desert. 9) Daniel

Fuentes, Olac

208

National Ignition Facility Title II Design Plan  

SciTech Connect

This National Ignition Facility (NIF) Title II Design Plan defines the work to be performed by the NIF Project Team between November 1996, when the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reviewed Title I design and authorized the initiation of Title H design and specific long-lead procurements, and September 1998, when Title 11 design will be completed.

Kumpan, S

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Supplement Tables - Contact  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Supplement Tables to the AEO99 Supplement Tables to the AEO99 bullet1.gif (843 bytes) Annual Energy Outlook 1999 bullet1.gif (843 bytes) Assumptions to the AEO99 bullet1.gif (843 bytes) NEMS Conference bullet1.gif (843 bytes) To Forecasting Home Page bullet1.gif (843 bytes) EIA Homepage furtherinfo.gif (5474 bytes) The Annual Energy Outlook 1999 (AEO99) was prepared by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, under the direction of Mary J. Hutzler (mhutzler@eia.doe.gov, 202/586-2222). General questions may be addressed to Arthur T. Andersen (aanderse@eia.doe.gov, 202/586-1441), Director of the International, Economic, and Greenhouse Gas Division; Susan H. Holte (sholte@eia.doe.gov, 202/586-4838), Director of the Demand and Integration Division; James M. Kendell (jkendell@eia.doe.gov, 202/586-9646), Director of the Oil and Gas Division; Scott Sitzer (ssitzer@eia.doe.gov, 202/586-2308), Director of the Coal and Electric Power Division; or Andy S. Kydes (akydes@eia.doe.gov, 202/586-2222), Senior Modeling Analyst. Detailed questions about the forecasts and related model components may be addressed to the following analysts:

210

Appendix B: Summary Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Bingaman U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Bingaman Appendix B: Summary Tables Table B1. The BCES and alternative cases compared to the Reference case, 2025 2009 2025 Ref Ref BCES All Clean Partial Credit Revised Baseline Small Utilities Credit Cap 2.1 Credit Cap 3.0 Stnds + Cds Generation (billion kilowatthours) Coal 1,772 2,049 1,431 1,305 1,387 1,180 1,767 1,714 1,571 1,358 Petroleum 41 45 43 44 44 44 45 45 45 43 Natural Gas 931 1,002 1,341 1,342 1,269 1,486 1,164 1,193 1,243 1,314 Nuclear 799 871 859 906 942 889 878 857 843 826 Conventional Hydropower 274 306 322 319 300 321 316 298 312 322 Geothermal 15 25 28 25 31 24 27 22 23 24 Municipal Waste 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Wood and Other Biomass 38 162 303 289 295 301 241 266

211

CBECS 1992 - Consumption & Expenditures, Detailed Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Detailed Tables Detailed Tables Detailed Tables Figure on Energy Consumption in Commercial Buildings by Energy Source, 1992 Divider Line The 49 tables present detailed energy consumption and expenditure data for buildings in the commercial sector. This section provides assistance in reading the tables by explaining some of the headings for the data categories. It will also explain the use of row and column factors to compute both the confidence levels of the estimates given in the tables and the statistical significance of differences between the data in two or more categories. The section concludes with a "Quick-Reference Guide" to the statistics in the different tables. Categories of Data in the Tables After Table 3.1, which is a summary table, the tables are grouped into the major fuel tables (Tables 3.2 through 3.13) and the specific fuel tables (Tables 3.14 through 3.29 for electricity, Tables 3.30 through 3.40 for natural gas, Tables 3.41 through 3.45 for fuel oil, and Tables 3.46 through 3.47 for district heat). Table 3.48 presents energy management and DSM data as reported by the building respondent. Table 3.49 presents data on participation in electric utility-sponsored DSM programs as reported by both the building respondent and the electricity supplier.

212

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report: "Cost-Effective Treatment of Produced Water Using Co-Produced Energy Sources for Small Producers," PRRC/NMT/Harvard Report: "Cost-Effective Treatment of Produced Water Using Co-Produced Energy Sources for Small Producers," PRRC/NMT/Harvard Final Report to Title of Project: Cost-Effective Treatment of Produced Water Using Co-Produced Energy Sources for Small Producers 07123-05.FINAL Date: January 5, 2012 Team Members: Robert Balch, Program Manager, PI Liangxiong Li, Principle Investigator Shanker Muraleedharan Jeff Harvard Point of Contact: Telephone Number: (575) 835-5305 Facsimile Number: (505) 835-6031 e-mail address: balch@prrc.nmt.edu Performer: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center Performer Address: 801 Leroy Place Socorro, NM 87801 USA Participants: Harvard Petroleum Corporation

213

Table.PDF  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 LDRD PROJECTS 3 LDRD PROJECTS LDRD Proj. Project Title P.I. Dept./Bldg. 01-13 "Functional Spectral Signature" (FSS) Method for Signal to Noise-Enhancement of Brain Patterns in PET Images Felder C. MED/490 01-30 Development of CZT array detector Technology for Synchrotron Radiation Applications Siddons D.P. NSLS/725D 01-31 New Applications of Circular Polarized VUV-light (NANO IV) Vescovo E. NSLS/725D 01-35 Prototype approaches for Infrared Nanospectroscopy Carr G.L. NSLS/725D 01-36 Pressure-Induced Protein Folding Monitored by Small Angle X-Ray Scattering and Fourier Transform Infrared Microspectroscopy Miller Lisa NSLS/725D 01-38 Soft Condensed Matter Probed by Low-energy Resonant Scattering Caliebe W. NSLS/725D 01-39 Femto-Second Transmission Electron Microscope Based on Photocathode RF Gun

214

Microsoft Word - table_87  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5 5 Table 6. Natural gas processed, liquids extracted, and natural gas plant liquids production, by state, 2012 Alabama 87,269 5,309 7,110 Alabama Onshore Alabama 33,921 2,614 3,132 Alabama Offshore Alabama 53,348 2,695 3,978 Alaska 2,788,997 18,339 21,470 Alaska 2,788,997 18,339 21,470 Arkansas 6,872 336 424 Arkansas 6,872 336 424 California 169,203 9,923 12,755 California Onshore California 169,203 9,923 12,755 California Offshore California NA NA NA Federal Offshore California NA NA NA

215

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Project Summary 1. Technical Progress 3 2. Cost Reporting 5 B. Detailed Reports 1.1 Magnets & Supports 8 1.2 Vacuum System 12 1.3 Power Supplies 14 1.4 RF System 16 1.5 Instrumentation & Controls 17 1.6 Cable Plant 18 1.7 Beam Line Front Ends 19 1.8 Facilities 19 1.9 Installation 20 2.1 Accelerator Physics 21 2 A. SPEAR 3 PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Technical Progress The progress and highlights of each major technical system are summarized below. Additional details are provided in Section B. Magnets - As of the end of this quarter (March 31, 2002), the status of magnet fabrication is as follows: Magnet Type Number Received % of Total Received Dipoles 40 100% Quadrupoles 102 100% Sextupoles 76 100%

216

Reviews, Tables, and Plots  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Review of Particle Physics 4 Review of Particle Physics Please use this CITATION: S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004) (bibtex) Standalone figures are now available for these reviews. Categories: * Constants, Units, Atomic and Nuclear Properties * Standard Model and Related Topics * Particle Properties * Hypothetical Particles * Astrophysics and Cosmology * Experimental Methods and Colliders * Mathematical Tools * Kinematics, Cross-Section Formulae, and Plots * Authors, Introductory Text, History plots PostScript help file PDF help file Constants, Units, Atomic and Nuclear Properties Physical constants (Rev.) PS PDF (1 page) Astrophysical constants (Rev.) PS PDF (2 pages) International System of units (SI) PS PDF (2 pages) Periodic table of the elements (Rev.) errata PS PDF (1 page)

217

Table G3  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1905-0194 1905-0194 Expiration Date: 07/31/2013 May 28, 2010 Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases 14 Table G3. Decision Chart for a Start Year Report for a Large Emitter Intending To Register Reductions Report Characteristics Reporting Requirements Schedule I Schedule II (For Each Subentity) Schedule III Schedule IV Sec. 1 Sec. 2 Sec. 3 Sec. 4 Sec. 1 Sec. 2 & Add. A Sec. 3 Sec. 1 Sec. 2 Sec. 1 Sec. 2 Part A Part B Part C Part D Part E Part A Part B Part C Independent Verification? All A- or B-Rated Methods? Foreign Emissions? Entity-Wide Reductions Only? Entity Statement Aggregated Emissions by Gas (Domestic and Foreign) † Emissions Inventory by Source

218

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

through June 2001 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Project Summary 1. Technical Progress 3 2. Cost Reporting 4 B. Detailed Reports 1.1 Magnets & Supports 9 1.2 Vacuum System 16 1.3 Power Supplies 21 1.4 RF System 25 1.5 Instrumentation & Controls 26 1.6 Cable Plant 28 1.8 Facilities 28 2.0 Accelerator Physics 29 2.1 ES&H 31 3 A. SPEAR 3 PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Technical Progress Magnet System - The project has received three shipments of magnets from IHEP. A total of 55 dipole, quadrupole and sextupole magnets out of 218 have arrived. All main magnets will arrive by December. The additional mechanical and electrical checks of the magnets at SSRL have been successful. Only minor mechanical problems were found and corrected. The prototype

219

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

AC05-00OR22800 AC05-00OR22800 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Page # TOC - i SECTION A - SOLICITATION/OFFER AND AWARD ......................................................................... A-i SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS ........................................................ B-i B.1 SERVICES BEING ACQUIRED ....................................................................................B-2 B.2 TRANSITION COST, ESTIMATED COST, MAXIMUM AVAILABLE FEE, AND AVAILABLE FEE (Modification 295, 290, 284, 280, 270, 257, 239, 238, 219, M201, M180, M162, M153, M150, M141, M132, M103, M092, M080, M055, M051, M049, M034, M022, M003, A002) ..........................................................B-2 SECTION C - DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATION/WORK STATEMENT DESCRIPTION OF

220

Table of Contents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y O O F F F F I I C C E E O O F F I I N N S S P P E E C C T T O O R R G G E E N N E E R R A A L L Semiannual Report toCongress DOE/IG-0065 April 1 - September 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS From the Desk of the Inspector General ..................................................... 2 Impacts Key Accomplishments ............................................................................................... 3 Positive Outcomes ...................................................................................................... 3 Reports Investigative Outcomes .............................................................................................. 6 Audits ......................................................................................................................... 8

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

October October through December 2001 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Project Summary 1. Technical Progress 3 2. Cost Reporting 4 B. Detailed Reports 1.1 Magnets & Supports 7 1.2 Vacuum System 9 1.3 Power Supplies 13 1.4 RF System 16 1.5 Instrumentation & Controls 17 1.6 Cable Plant 18 1.9 Installation 19 2.0 Accelerator Physics 20 3 A. SPEAR 3 PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Technical Progress In the magnet area, the production of all major components (dipoles, quadrupoles, and sextupoles) has been completed on schedule. This results from a highly successful collaboration with our colleagues at the Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) in Beijing. The production of corrector magnets is still in progress with completion scheduled for May 2002.

222

2003 CBECS Detailed Tables: Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Energy Expenditures by Major Fuel c2-pdf c2.xls c2.html Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels c3.pdf c3.xls c3.html Table C4. Expenditures for...

223

2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Table of Contents 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents June 2014 2014 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents The Table of...

224

FY 2014 Budget Request Summary Table | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Summary Table FY 2014 Budget Request Summary Table Summary Table by Appropriations Summary Table by Organization More Documents & Publications FY 2014 Budget Request Statistical...

225

ARM - Instrument - s-table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

govInstrumentss-table govInstrumentss-table Documentation S-TABLE : Instrument Mentor Monthly Summary (IMMS) reports S-TABLE : Data Quality Assessment (DQA) reports ARM Data Discovery Browse Data Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Instrument : Stabilized Platform (S-TABLE) Instrument Categories Ocean Observations For ship-based deployments, some instruments require actively stabilized platforms to compensate for the ship's motion, especially rotations around the long axis of the ship (roll), short axis (pitch), and, for some instruments, vertical axis (yaw). ARM currently employs two types of stabilized platforms: one electrically controlled for lighter instruments that includes yaw control (dubbed RPY for Roll, Pitch, Yaw) and one

226

Administration Policy Complete Policy Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Administration Policy Complete Policy Title: McMaster University Alcohol Policy Policy Number, 1998 Supersedes/Amends Policy dated: May 11, 1998 Responsible Executive: Vice-President (Administration policy and the written copy held by the policy owner, the written copy prevails. INTRODUCTION Mc

Haykin, Simon

227

Title Slide "Memorability and Invisibility  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Title Slide 2002- "Memorability and Invisibility: A tale of two alarm clocks and other stories from. Disclaimer #12;v. 1.1, 26/Aug/2002, (slide 1 - 3). © L.Hatton, 2001- O Memorability and invisibility Mobile phone tariffs O Memorability and invisibility for defects: the dark side Overview #12;v. 1.1, 26

Hatton, Les

228

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

APPENDIX I APPENDIX I NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I.1 Noise and Vibration Terminology...........................................................................................I-1 I.2 Noise Analysis Methodology ..................................................................................................I-2 I.2.1 Wayside Noise Model Methodology ................................................................................I-3 I.2.2 Horn Noise Model Methodology ......................................................................................I-5 I.3 Vibration Analysis Methodology ............................................................................................I-7

229

table14.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 14. Natural Gas Wellhead Prices, Actual vs. Reference Case Projections Table 14. Natural Gas Wellhead Prices, Actual vs. Reference Case Projections (current dollars per thousand cubic feet) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 AEO 1982 4.32 5.47 6.67 7.51 8.04 8.57 AEO 1983 2.93 3.11 3.46 3.93 4.56 5.26 12.74 AEO 1984 2.77 2.90 3.21 3.63 4.13 4.79 9.33 AEO 1985 2.60 2.61 2.66 2.71 2.94 3.35 3.85 4.46 5.10 5.83 6.67 AEO 1986 1.73 1.96 2.29 2.54 2.81 3.15 3.73 4.34 5.06 5.90 6.79 7.70 8.62 9.68 10.80 AEO 1987 1.83 1.95 2.11 2.28 2.49 2.72 3.08 3.51 4.07 7.54 AEO 1989* 1.62 1.70 1.91 2.13 2.58 3.04 3.48 3.93 4.76 5.23 5.80 6.43 6.98 AEO 1990 1.78 1.88 2.93 5.36 AEO 1991 1.77 1.90 2.11 2.30 2.42 2.51 2.60 2.74 2.91 3.29 3.75 4.31 5.07 5.77 6.45 AEO 1992 1.69 1.85 2.03 2.15 2.35 2.51 2.74 3.01 3.40 3.81 4.24 4.74 5.25 5.78 AEO 1993 1.85 1.94 2.09 2.30 2.44 2.60 2.85 3.12 3.47 3.84 4.31 4.81 5.28

230

Code Tables | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

System NMMSS Information, Reports & Forms Code Tables Code Tables U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Materials Management & Safeguards...

231

MECS Fuel Oil Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

: Actual, Minimum and Maximum Use Values for Fuel Oils and Natural Gas : Actual, Minimum and Maximum Use Values for Fuel Oils and Natural Gas Year Distillate Fuel Oil (TBtu) Actual Minimum Maximum Discretionary Rate 1985 185 148 1224 3.4% 1994 152 125 1020 3.1% Residual Fuel Oil (TBtu) Actual Minimum Maximum Discretionary Rate 1985 505 290 1577 16.7% 1994 441 241 1249 19.8% Natural Gas (TBtu) Actual Minimum Maximum Discretionary Rate 1985 4656 2702 5233 77.2% 1994 6141 4435 6758 73.4% Source: Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, 1985 and 1994 Manufacturing Energy Consumption Surveys. Table 2: Establishments That Actually Switched Between Natural Gas and Residual Fuel Oil Type of Switch Number of Establishments in Population Number That Use Original Fuel Percentage That Use Original Fuel Number That Can Switch to Another Fuel Percentage That Can Switch to Another Fuel Number That Actually Made a Switch Percentage That Actually Made a Switch

232

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Turbines The Gas Turbine Handbook The Gas Turbine Handbook TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Updated Author Contact Information Introduction - Rich Dennis, Turbines Technology Manager 1.1 Simple and Combined Cycles - Claire Soares 1.1-1 Introduction 1.1-2 Applications 1.1-3 Applications versatility 1.1-4 The History of the Gas Turbine 1.1-5 Gas Turbine, Major Components, Modules, and systems 1.1-6 Design development with Gas Turbines 1.1-7 Gas Turbine Performance 1.1-8 Combined Cycles 1.1-9 Notes 1.2 Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) - Massod Ramezan and Gary Stiegel 1.2-1 Introduction 1.2-2 The Gasification Process 1.2-3 IGCC Systems 1.2-4 Gasifier Improvements 1.2-5 Gas Separation Improvements 1.2-6 Conclusions 1.2-7 Notes 1.2.1 Different Types of Gasifiers and Their Integration with Gas Turbines - Jeffrey Phillips

233

EIA - Annual Energy Outlook 2009 - chapter Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Chapter Tables Chapter Tables Annual Energy Outlook 2009 with Projections to 2030 Chapter Tables Table 1. Estimated fuel economy for light-duty vehicles, based on proposed CAFE standards, 2010-2015 Table 2. State appliance efficiency standards and potential future actions Table 3. State renewable portfolio standards Table 4. Key analyses from "issues in Focus" in recent AEOs Table 5. Liquid fuels production in three cases, 2007 and 2030 Table 6. Assumptions used in comparing conventional and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Table 7. Conventional vehicle and plug-in hybrid system component costs for mid-size vehicles at volume production Table 8. Technically recoverable resources of crude oil and natural gas in the Outer Continental Shelf, as of January 1, 2007

234

Residential Lighting: Title 24 and Technology Update  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Residential Lighting: Title 24 and Technology Update Best practices in lighting design to comply the development and deployment of energy-efficient lighting and daylighting technologies in partnership. Effectively apply the residential Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards requirements specific

California at Davis, University of

235

Title: Pore formation in Polymer Electrolytes Abstract: Much of our ...  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The efficient conversion of energy from one form to another, particularly solar, ... The polymer electrolytes in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) fuel cells...

236

Reviews, Tables, and Plots  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Review of Particle Physics 2 Review of Particle Physics Please use this CITATION: K. Hagiwara et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 (2002) (bibtex) New: Standalone figures are now available for these reviews. Categories: * Constants, Units, Atomic and Nuclear Properties * Standard Model and Related Topics * Particle Properties * Hypothetical Particles * Astrophysics and Cosmology * Experimental Methods and Colliders * Mathematical Tools * Kinematics, Cross-Section Formulae, and Plots * Authors, Introductory Text, History plots PostScript help file PDF help file Constants, Units, Atomic and Nuclear Properties Physical constants (Rev.) PS PDF (6 pages) Physical constants (Rev.) Book Format PS PDF (1 page) Astrophysical constants (Rev.) PS PDF (7 pages) Astrophysical constants (Rev.) Book Format PS PDF (2 pages)

237

MECS 1991 Publications and Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Publication and Tables Publication and Tables Publication and Tables Figure showing the Largest Energy Consumers in the Manufacturing Sector You have the option of downloading the entire report or selected sections of the report. Full Report - Manufacturing Consumption of Energy 1991 (file size 17.2 MB) pages:566 Selected Sections Main Text (file size 380,153 bytes) pages: 33, includes the following: Contacts Contents Executive Summary Introduction Energy Consumption in the Manufacturing Sector: An Overview Energy Consumption in the Manufacturing Sector, 1991 Manufacturing Capability To Switch Fuels Appendices Appendix A. Detailed Tables Appendix B. Survey Design, Implementation, and Estimates (file size 141,211 bytes) pages: 22. Appendix C. Quality of the Data (file size 135,511 bytes) pages: 8.

238

TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

............................................... 12 Water-Source Heat Pump Performance ............................ 18 Air-Source Heat Pump OF PERFORMANCE OF WATER-SOURCE HEAT PUMP .............................. ................. 23 FIGURE 2. NODAL. MONTHLY HEAT GAIN/LOSS FACTORS ........................... 5 TABLE 2. BASE TEMPERATURES

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

239

EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested changes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested changes EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested changes On cost recovery basis, the CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA agreements can be distinguished as follows: Participant covers any DOE Laboratory costs? NO = NPUA 1 , no cost recovery YES = Participant uses DOE Contractor personnel (other than incidental use)? NO = PUA 2 , full cost recovery YES = Participant "hires" DOE Contractor personnel (as opposed to joint research collaboration)? NO = CRADA 3 , full or partial cost recovery YES = WFO 4 , full cost recovery We suggest the following changes to the CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA agreements below. 5 1. Title.......................................................................................................................................................................................................2

240

EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested changes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested changes EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested changes On cost recovery basis, the CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA agreements can be distinguished as follows: Participant covers any DOE Laboratory costs? NO = NPUA 1 , no cost recovery YES = Participant uses DOE Contractor personnel (other than incidental use)? NO = PUA 2 , full cost recovery YES = Participant "hires" DOE Contractor personnel (as opposed to joint research collaboration)? NO = CRADA 3 , full or partial cost recovery YES = WFO 4 , full cost recovery We suggest the following changes to the CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA agreements below. 5 1. Title.......................................................................................................................................................................................................2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

An efficient software testing method by decision table verification  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A typical software testing is performed by making and running test cases that consist of input pattern and expected output pattern. Because exhaustive testing requires billions of test cases and many labours, we can only perform hundreds of them in practice. As for a software logic testing, selecting test cases from many candidates to achieve enough programme path coverage is important, and specific software testing skills are required for it. In our study, we propose a knowledge creation method of software logic extracted automatically from programme source code. In our method, all possible programme paths are extracted from source code, then converted into a decision table, which is easy-readable table format for software testing engineer. The logic verification can be performed exhaustively in a short time by comparing the decision table with a specification of software. Our method would contribute to improve both efficiency and quality of software testing.

Keiji Uetsuki; Tohru Matsuodani; Kazuhiko Tsuda

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Research Highlights Sorted by Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Title Title "Invisible" Giants in the Sky ARM ASR Kassianov, E. "Radiance Assimilation" Correction Method Improves Water Vapor Radiosonde Observations in the Upper Troposphere ARM Soden, B. J. "Roobik" Is Part of the Answer, Not a Puzzle ARM Turner, D. D. 2007 Floods Not a Complete Washout in U.S. Great Plains ARM ASR Bhattacharya, A. A "Little" Respect: Droplet Nucleation Finally Included in Global Climate Model ARM Ghan, S. J. A Bulk Parameterization of Giant Cloud Condensation Nuclei ARM Kogan, Y. A Climatology of Midlatitude Continental Cloud Properties and Their Impact on the Surface Radiation Budget ARM Dong, X. A Comparison of Integrated Water Vapor Sensors: WVIOP-96 ARM Liljegren, J. C. A Consistency Analysis of ARESE Aircraft Measurements ARM

243

click here to add title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the of the Igneous Consequences Peer Review Panel Prepared for: Bechtel SAIC Company LLC Las Vegas, Nevada Prepared by: Emmanuel Detournay, Larry G. Mastin, J.R. Anthony Pearson, Allan M. Rubin and Frank J. Spera April 2003 The Panel is working under contract to Bechtel SAIC Company LLC, for the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management of the U.S. Department of Energy TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS _______________________________________I CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ____________________________ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND _________________________________________________ 1 1.2 PANEL MEMBERSHIP __________________________________________ 1 1.3 TERMS OF REFERENCE AND GENERAL APPROACH _____________ 3 1.4 PRINCIPAL ISSUES AND SCOPE OF REPORT _____________________ 4 1.5 NATURE AND CONTENT OF THE REPORT

244

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS To ensure a more reader-friendly document, the U.S. Department of Energy limited the use of acronyms and abbreviations in this environmental impact statement. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined the first time they are used in each chapter or appendix. The acronyms and abbreviations used in the text of this document are listed below. Acronyms and abbreviations used in tables and figures because of space limitations are listed in footnotes to the tables and figures. BLM Bureau of Land Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CO carbon monoxide dB decibels dBA A-weighted decibels DIRS Document Input Reference System DOE U.S. Department of Energy DNL day-night average noise level

245

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS To ensure a more reader-friendly document, the U.S. Department of Energy limited the use of acronyms and abbreviations in this environmental impact statement. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined the first time they are used in each chapter or appendix. The acronyms and abbreviations used in the text of this document are listed below. Acronyms and abbreviations used in tables and figures because of space limitations are listed in footnotes to the tables and figures. BLM Bureau of Land Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CO carbon monoxide dB decibels dBA A-weighted decibels DIRS Document Input Reference System DOE U.S. Department of Energy DNL day-night average noise level

246

Practical experience with Title V  

SciTech Connect

Having prepared numerous Title V permit applications and applications for synthetic minor status, the do`s and don`ts of this experience are evaluated. The philosophy for what goes into the application is reviewed, with special regard to the EPA {open_quotes}White Paper{close_quotes} on streamlining the process. The pros and cons of accepting and applying for synthetic minor status are evaluated.

Hoffnagle, G.F. [TRC Environmental, Windsor, CT (United States)

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

247

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

II II Rail Alignment EIS - Chapter 3 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management June 2008 Rail Alignment EIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page VOLUME I CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION CHAPTER 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES VOLUME II CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Caliente Rail Alignment ......................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.1 Physical Setting ................................................................................................................ 3-7 3.2.1.1 Region

248

Characteristics of Serial Title Changes and Recognition of New Serial Works: Theoretical and Practical Implications  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The paper reports findings from a study to identify characteristics of serials with title changes and then make recommendations for recognizing new works for these serials. Findings show title changes occur due to underlying subject, function, corporate, geographic, frequency, or format changes, with 80.8% of the changes being subject or function changes. It is recommended that reasons for title changes be determined from clear statements in text or elsewhere, and that new works be recognized based upon the requirements of a definition of a work. With the FRBR definition, a new work would be recognized only for a significant subject or function change.

Mavis B. Molto

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Description of the Formerly Utilized Description of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program United States Department o f Energy "This book w l r prepartd u a n account 01 wo* lporuond by m uency o f the Unhd Sutes Govrrnmrnt. N a l h r t the United StalrsGovrrnment nos i n y m y lhumf, rm any 01 lheh employees, makes any .nrrmly, u p m r or impkd, or arrunrr my I@ LirbHty or rcsponiibiiily for ihe rccutrcy. wmplaenm. 01 u ~ l u l n e ~ i of any intotnulion, mppmtur, p f d u c t , 01 p r o m s d i ~ l o w d , or rtprrlrntr that i s we MUM mi initlnp plivmdy omd rightr Refnrnce herein L o m y rpedfw wmmrcial produel, pmarr, o r s e n h by b a d e name, tr.demaR, mmufrctunr, or othcrurtrr, doer not mcnrrlly m n n h u u m its endoncmmt, rccommmdalion, or favorin# b y the United Stater Govmment or my y m ~ y thacol. The vi+ur and opiljOna o

250

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

SHOAL AREA SHOAL AREA TRACER TEST EXPERlIMENT prepared by Rosemary Carrolt, Todd Mihevc, Greg Pohll, Brad Lyles, Sean Kosinski and Rich Niswonger submitted to Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy Las Vegas, Nevada NOVEMBER 2000 Publication No. 45177 Reference herein to any specific commercial pmduct, process, or service by trade name, trademark, mufacturer, or otherw~se, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views a d opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy.

251

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

- . ' R U L 000003 United States Office of Radiation and ~ ~ ~ - 4 0 2 7 ~ - 0 2 - 0 0 7 Environmental Protection 1ndoor Air November 2002 Agency Washington, DC 20460 &EPA Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2002: SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2002 SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Max G. Davis Terry L. Mouck Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11969 RADIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY OFFICE OF RADIATION AND INDOOR AIR

252

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-. -. i . , . United States Government L-u+-tw / S / V ~ f Department of nersy memorandum D i T E June 0 5 , 1995 FEP-Y ATTK OF: EM-421 (U. A. Williams, 301-903-8149) SUGJECT Hazard Assessmnt f o r Radioactive Contamination a t the Associate. A i r c r a f t Site, F a i r f i e l d , Ohio To L. Price, OR This memorandum i s t o ' provide comments and approval o f the Associate i r ft i t n f o r e n ' i A r c a S eHazardAssessmet I d t i f e d S o i l C ~ m i n a t i o n . The hazard assessment was prepared and supplemental 1 i m i t s were requested, based on a single s o i l sample w i t h 134 picocuries per gran o f uranium. This sample was obtained from underneath the b u i l d i n g slab i n an area t h a t was a loading dock f o r the f a c i l i t y during Atomic Energy Comnission operations during the 1950s. The area i s n o t r e

253

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

amv. amv. I.. - - DESlON CRITERIA FOR f ORMERLV UTILIZISU 81TEb REMEDIAL ACTIUN PROORAM [FUmRAP) AND BURPLUS FACILITIES MANAOEMENT D E S I G N C R I T E R I A POR FORMERLY U T I L I Z E D S I T E S REHEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (?USRAP). AlPD SURPLUS FACILITIES MUINAGEHEIT P R O C R U (SFHP) ( I S S U E D FOR C L I E N T APPROVAL) FEBRUARY 1 9 8 6 ~pproved by: a . CI, Director 2- 24-86 Date T e c h n i c a l Services Division Oak RiPge Operations Office Approved by: 2-24-86 Date Construction and E n g i n e e r i n g Oak Ridge Operations Office 14501-00-DC-01 Rev. 1 PREFACE TO DESIGN CRITERIA T h t s t drsiqn criteria have barn-written i n a generic form that sunmarizes criteria applicable for remedial action and long-term mmagcnent activities associated with the radioactive vaster at the fDSRhP end S?HP sites. Site-specific Information is provided in the

254

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mi Mi w u United S taies Office of Radiation a ~ d EPA 8 Environmental Protection Indoor Air Dcccmbcr 1999 Q Agency Washington, DC 304hC) EPA-402-R-93-0 12 Q w 0 4 : 0 0 0 4 &€PA Annual Water Samp and Analysis Ca endar Year 1999: RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 1999 RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area by Max G. Davis Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AIO8-96NVl1969 FL4DIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY OFFICE OF RADIATION AND INDOOR AIR

255

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

, , - :. , L L b ' pi1 2 25. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI a . a . , i l l ; .. - . a ,-. , I , SALMON SITE , , , . . . C I A . - - 1 COUNTY OF LAMAR - T - TRACT NO. 101-E KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that, we, MARTHA T. BRIDGES alkla MARTHA TATUM BRIDGES LOPEZ, ROBERT TODD BRIDGES, MARTHA TATUM BRIDGES LOPEZ as Guardian of Nlchoias Carl Bridges, a minor, DIANA W. TATUM, NANCY 0. TATUM, and ADDISON T. TATUM, JR., alkla A. T. Tatum, Jr., whose addreas I s clo Mr. John Burnam, Post Office Box 1828, Hattiesburg, Mlssisslppi 39403, hereinafter referred to as the GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND NO1100 ($300.09). the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, do hereby GRANT. BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY unto the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

256

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Hydrologic Processes and Hydrologic Processes and Radionuclide Distribution in a Cavity and Chimney Produced by the Cannikin Nuclear Explosion I Amchitka Island, Alaska By HANS C. C M S S E N H Y D R O L O G Y O F N U C L E A R T E S T S I T E S G E O L O G I C A L S U R V E Y P R O F E S S I O N A L P A P E R 7 1 2 - D Prepared on behay o J the US. Energy Research and Deuclopment Administration U N I T E D S T A T E S G O V E R N M E N T P R I N T I N G O F F I C E . W A S H I N G T O N : 1978 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS. sectwary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey. Direcror Library of Conlresr Cnrriolrtn# tn Puhltcrtban Udtr Ct*aaasn. Wnnr C. WydrOlo~nC procesbes and radionucl~dc distributnon in a cavity and chnmncv praduccd by rna Cannukin nuslssr ~ n n l u r r u n . h m c n n u r islrnd. AI;n*U*. (Hydrolory o f nuclssr tcat ritsal (Caoloyicsl Survey Profeuionai P

257

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 ~ 1 ~ ~ l l R R l l l l l l l i l ~ l ~ I R u 0 0 0 0 ~ f A Class 111 Cultural Resources Survey of the U. S. Department of Energy Rullson Gas Stimulation Test S f e Garfield County, Colorado December 1993 IT be?: tlX'i;j PBBRARII Environmental Restoration 1 A Class Ill Cultural Resources Survey of the U. S. Department of Energy Rulison Gas Stimulation Test Site Garfield County, Co torado December 1 993 Environmental Restoration A Class Ill Cultural Resources Survey of the U . S . Department of Energy Rulison Gas Stimulation Test Site Garfield County, Colorado Prepared for: W E Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-8518 Prepared by: I T Corporation 4330 S. Valley View Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89103 Work Performed under Contract No.: DE-AC08-92NV 10972 December 1993

258

Title  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Unlocking Energy Efficiency Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy 2010 Energy Conference EIA, SAIS April 7, 2010 McKinsey & Company | 1 Carbon emissions Gigatons CO 2 e * End-use consumption Quadrillion BTUs * Includes carbon emission abatement potential from CHP Source: EIA AEO 2008, McKinsey analysis Significant energy efficiency potential exists in the U.S. economy Industrial Residential Commercial -9.1 Baseline 2020 Baseline case, 2008 30.8 36.9 39.9 NPV- positive case, 2020 3.2 NPV- positive case, 2020 Baseline 2020 4.3 Baseline case, 2008 3.9 -26% Savings -23% -18% -29% -28% McKinsey & Company | 2 Source: EIA AEO 2008, McKinsey analysis Primary energy End-use energy Electricity CHP Gas Oil Other Carbon emissions 100%= 9.1 quadrillion BTUs 1,080 TWh 2.9 TCF 250 MBOE Significant efficiency potential across fuel types Contribution by energy source to 2020 efficiency potential

259

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jamie Brown Jamie Brown Director, Earth & Mineral Sciences Division EPAct Complementary Program Update January 25, 2008 Office of Research and Development Introduction NETL's EPAct 999 Complementary R&D Program * Overview of the 4 research areas: - Drilling Under Extreme Conditions (DUEC) - improve the economic viability of drilling for and producing from domestic deep (>15, 000ft) and ultra-deep (>25,000ft)O&G resources. - Environmental Impacts of O&G (EI) - provide unbiased scientific information and analysis of the environmental impacts of O&G, and develop new technology to effectively deal with any negative environmental impacts - Enhanced and Unconventional Oil Recovery (EUOR) - develop advanced technologies that will move the status of known but recoverable oil resources to

260

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oil & Natural Gas R&D Oil & Natural Gas R&D National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Fossil Energy 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) EPACT 2005, Subtitle J, Section999 John R. Duda, Deputy Director Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil January 30, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) Development * RPSEA submitted Draft Annual Plan - November 14, 2007 - Modifications to 2007 plan * NETL developed the 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) - Federal Advisory Committees' recommendations - Program status and requirements - Complementary research plan * Submitted to HQ - December 11, 2007 - Incorporated comments from FE, et al * Sent to Federal Advisory Committees - January 9, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil 2008 Annual Plan (Draft) General * "Ongoing activities"

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's Upcoming DOE's Upcoming 2012 Congestion Study Keith White California Public Utilities Commission December 15, 2011 2 General Comments ◊ California has been fully participating in west-wide "economic" transmission studies (TEPPC since 2006, recently with much-appreciated ARRA funding) ◊ The 2005 Energy Policy Act gives DOE unclear scope regarding "congestion," and a requirement to consult with states. The following are essential: * Clearly address the specific rationale for transmission: reliability, economic efficiency, resource priorities; * If considering potential future congestion* contingent on certain conditions, fully consider the likelihood of those conditions and the consistency with state energy policies and actual market developments.

262

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

James Bennett National Energy Technology Laboratory - USDOE E-Mail: james.bennett@netl.doe.gov Phone: 541-967-5983 Research Efforts at NETL to Improve Gasifier Performance GTC 2013, Colorado Springs, CO - Oct 13-16, 2013 CSC Fouling Refractory/TC Wear RSC Fouling Syngas Cleanup OUTLINE - Research Objectives - Program Overview - Materials Research Focus (Refractories) * Scope of work * Impact to date * Long range goals - Industrial Involvement - Summary/Disclaimer 3 Advanced Gasification Spalling Corrosion Goals: increase gasifier efficiency, reduce capital and operational costs, reduce cost of electricity, develop predictive gasifier models, meet/exceed EPA emission targets, and increase carbon feedstock flexibility (including U.S. low rank coals)

263

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractors Contractors July 2010 Reporting Period 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

264

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Unconventional Resources Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Recommendations - 2007 Annual Plan Brad Tomer, Director Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil January 29, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Federal Advisory Committee Recommendations for 2007 Draft Plan * All recommendations were accepted - Incorporated into the final 2007 Annual Plan - Addressed in an otherwise appropriate manner * This review is designed to briefly re-state summarized recommendations and DOE's response. Detailed discussions should be deferred until later in the day. Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee Sub-Groups * Technology Transfer * Regulations * Water and Environmental Management * Production Research Themes

265

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Corporare Center Corporare Center f 5 1 Lalayerre Drive P.O. Box 350 Oak Ridge. Tennewt 3783 1.0350 Facsimile: 1 6 1 5 1 220.2 100 ~ o b No. 14501, FUSRAP Project DOE Contract NO. DE-AC05-9 10R2 194 9 Code: 7340/WBS: 135 U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Field Office P . O . BOX 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-8723 Attention: David G. hdler, Site Manager , Former Sites Restoration Division subject: Hazard Assessment for Residual Contaminztion at the Former Associate Aircraft S i t e ' ( P 2 S ) Dear Mr. Adler: Based on sample results obtained a t A4S, uranium-238 concentrations above the site specific criteria (35 pCi/g) were found in a small sub-slab srsa in Section 1 of the former AAS building. The sample results of the location indicated radioactive contamination at a maximum concentration of 134 pci/g. T

266

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

, ,-- , ,-- - < , - ' a 7. *: POST OFFICE BOX 2038 1; : . - - , . MANAGED BY M h M l N M A R I E l T A E N E l G Y S I S l E H S . INC. - .-- OAK RIDGE. TENNESSEE 37831 FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMEIIT OF EWEROI April 22, 1994 Dr. W. k Williams EM-421 Trwion n: Building Department of Energy Washington, D. C 20585-0002 Dear Dr. Williams: In a letter to you dated August 18, 1993, a summary of the initial radiological survey was provided with only limited inionnation regarding mncentratiom in soil samples and radiation measurements inside the house. Since then, all of the samples from the initial survey have been analyzed and additional samples have been collected and anal- The reauits have been provided lo y o u ' d D. G. Adler informally as they became available ' I h i r letter contains all the 'as-found"

267

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nationd Laboratory Nationd Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IUinois 60439 DERIVATION OF GUIDELINES FOR UaANIUbi RESIDUAL &ADIOACTIVE MATERIAL M 801L AT THE FORMER - U T E AIRCRAFT TOOL AND m A C l ' U I U N C COMPANY SlTE, FAIRFIELD, OHIO E.R. Faillace, M . Nimmagadda, and C . Yu Environmental Assessment Division January 1995 work sponsonxl by U.S. Department of Energy OMice of Environmental Restoration Washington, D.C. CONTENTS NOTATION ......................................................... v ............................... 1 1NTRODU.CTION AND BRIEF HISTORY 3 ...................................... 1.1 Site Description and Setting 3 .................................................. 1.2 SiteHistory 4 1.3 Derivation of Cleanup Guidelines .................................. 6

268

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FORCE CONTROL INDUSTRIES,'INC. 1 FORCE CONTROL INDUSTRIES,'INC. 1 2 3 0 7 2 CONTROL %60 Dixie Hwy.. Zip 45014 P.O. Box l a . Z p 45018 11W b l e . Sule F Failfield. Ohio T w M i g a n a8083 Phone: (513) 868-0900 Phone: !B10) 52441= FAX. (513) 868-2105 F . U i81C.l 52d-1208 C,ir Shear Clutch & Brake Systems November 10.1994 U. S. Deparbnent of Energy Oak Ridge Operations office Ann: AD-424, Katy Kates P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Dear Ms. Kates, In furtherance of the August 24,1994 letter from Doug Shook, his subsequent conversation with our legal counsel, Timothy A. Gamy, follow-up with Steve Priest, and your letter of November 4,1994, the modifications you have proposed to the real estate license are acceptabte to us. As you suggested, we have made the changes to the real estate license heretofore submitted to us, and we have enclosed three copies of

269

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Individuals Individuals Step by Step Instructions - Page 1 of 4 Helpful Information STEP 1. Log in to the EH&S Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) system at https://ehswprod.lbl.gov/ehstraining/jha/login.aspx Use your LDAP username and Password to log in to the system. You may log in without an LDAP if you know that you have not been given one yet. Contact the Help Desk (486-4357) for assistance. Note: You will not be able to complete the process until you have a valid LDAP username and password STEP 2. To begin, select JHA New JHA from the Main Menu If you have already begun your JHA process, you can select to Modify or View from the JHA Main Menu item as well. Step by Step Instructions - Page 2 of 4 Helpful Information STEP 3. Begin the Questionnaire by selecting your work location

270

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients July 2010 Reporting Period 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

271

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contractors Contractors 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

272

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 1 Clean Energy Developments in the U.S. China-U.S. Renewable Energy Forum Bobi Garrett National Renewable Energy Laboratory May 26, 2010 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 2 Today's Talk * U.S. Clean Energy in Context * The U.S. Recovery Act: Opportunity from Crisis * The U.S. Congress and Clean Energy: Getting to 60 * China-U.S. Collaboration on Clean Energy 2 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 3 Today's Talk 3 * U.S. Clean Energy in Context * The U.S. Recovery Act: Opportunity from Crisis * The U.S. Congress and Clean Energy: Getting to 60 * China-U.S. Collaboration on Clean Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 4 U.S. Energy Production and

273

Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site Map Site Map Home Publications Software Facilities Links Staff Glazing Materials Chromogenics LowE and Spectrally Selective Deposition Processes Characterization New Materials Advanced Systems Superwindows Integrated Window Systems Gas-Filled Panels Window Properties Infrared Laboratory and Traversing System MoWiTT Window+5 Development Therm Development Film Coefficients Condensation Resistance Comfort Models Field Measurements LBNL Role in NFRC Optics Database Daylighting IEA Task 21 Lightshelves/Lightpipes Tools for Daylighting Prediction Demonstrations Daylighting Controls Residential Performance Energy Star ResFen Development ECW Demonstrations Annual Energy Rating Field Tests and Monitoring Projects

274

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients July, 2010 For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or go to: http://www.FederalReporting.gov 1 Outline of Presentation * Timeline * Helpful Hints for Repeat Reporters * When is FederalReporting.gov Reporting Complete? * FederalReporting.gov Features For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or

275

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

p p a * T A olistii. ..ow ... Unlted States awernment 00))#~Tmsnt of Energy - - memorandum D*=APR 0 2 1987 muym NE-23 A m OR W C I : Revised Guidelines f o r Resldual R a d ~ o a c t i v e M a t e r i a l a t N S R A P and R e m t e SRIP S l t e s Ahrends, OR Kluk, OP-124 Nelson, WSSPd Schrelber , SSDPD Welty, EH-23 G I l b e r t , MIL Berven, ORHL Berger, ORAL! Young, Aerospace Attached I s a revjsed copy o f thc Department's Guidelines f o r n s l d u a l r a d l o a c t f v e material. This versfon o f the doculnent has been revised t o i n c l u d e comnents from EH and t o address the h o t spot and s u p p l m n t a l . I i m l t/except{ons procedures out1 i n e d during t h e July 1906 workshop and subsequent working group meetings. EH intends t o include these guidelines i n d r a f t DOE Order 5480.x~. R a d i a t i o n P r o t e c t i o n o f t h e Publlc and

276

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Survey Results Survey Results for Neigh boring Properties of the Alba Craft Site Oxford, Ohio U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Index / / { i s / . . ....................................................... s. Main s t r a e t f i o w e s 3 . . (~1-008,012-014,016) : : , . W . Rose Avenue Properties ............................... .:. ........... I . . .97 (017) Linden Street Properties .................................................... 103 (010-011) Municipd Landfill h d parts of .......................................... 123 Tllpmnd. High School m p t s (018) Hr. J e f f Schroer Department of Energy Washmgton, DC 20585 S t ? i is93 Oxford Real Estate, Inc. 33 Yest Walnut S t m t Oxford, Ohto 4 5 M 6 Dear k. Schorr: W i t h theconsent of the m a r s , the U.S. Dapartrnt o

277

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TO File rn w. 1 1311 300 TO File rn w. 1 1311 300 s ~ b p ~ t B&T Metals Site Scoping Trip Report mh November 22, 1995 hwr J.G. Braun 01 FUSRAP - Geotech ~ l t 4D12 f i t 241-5296 C ~ M S T O Distribution This trip report summarizes the information obtained by b t h the New York and MissourifOhio Teams during visits to the B&T Metals site. The scoping trips were - . - . performed to provide information to aid in the detailed ptanning, design, and preparation for site characterization and remedial action. The scoping trips included a site walkover, library - - - research to investigate historic Sanborn maps and newspaper articles, an interview with a retired 3&T Metals employee who was involved with the former MEDlAEC activities, coordinating with the property owner in preparation for characterization and remedial action,

278

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OFF C OFF C . 1 Ili II11IlIIllllllllllllllI1111I~I B M - 171- 147 ~ ~ ~ 0 3 3 1 0 8 Biology and M e d i c i n e AMCHITKA BIOENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM BIOENVIRONMENTAL S A F E T Y STUDIES, AMC HITKA ISLAND, ALASKA CANNIKIN D t 2 MONTHS REPORT Compiled by James B . K i r k w o o d and R. G l e n Fuller J u n e , 1972 P r e p a r e d for the U . S. A t o m i c E n e r g y C o m m i s s i o n under C o n t r a c t N o . AT(2b- 1 ) - 17 1 - - BATTELLE Columbus Labor a t o r ies 5 05 King Avenue C o l u m b u s , Ohio 4 3 2 0 1 P r i n t e d i n the United S t a t e s of America. A v a i l a b l e from N a t i o n a l Technical Information S e r v i c e U.S. Department of Commerce S p r i n g f i e l d , V i r g i n i a 22151 This r e p o r t was prepared a s a n account o f work sponsored by t h e United S t a t e s Government. Neither t h e United S t a t e s . - nor t h e United S t a t e s Atomic Energy Carrmission, nor any of

279

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -, , / AMC 000102 ( Nevada DOE/NV--1106-REV. 1 1 Environmental Restoration Project Subsurface Completion Report for Amchitka Underground Nuclear Test Sites: Long Shot, Milrow, and Cannikin Revision No.: 1 September 2006 Approved for public release: further dissemination unlimited Environmental Restoration Project U.S. Department Of Energy National Nuclear Securlty Administration Nevada Sile OMW i - Available for public sale, in p a p from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Poa Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Ernail: prdtr$@ntis.gov Online ordering: htto:/hvww.n~~.~ov/ordenn~.htm Available electronically at htt~://www.osti.rov/hrid~e Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors,

280

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

AMCHITKA BIOLOGICAL IWODlATION S AMCHITKA BIOLOGICAL IWODlATION S J M U I i Y Prspard for tho U. S. Atoric En~rny C d a a i o n undmr Contract No. A T (26-11-171 MTTkUE Colrubua LaboratoriRa 505 Kirq A V ~ R Collubua. Ohio 43201 Printed i n t h e U n i t d S t a t ~ of A l r r i w . A v a i h b l e f t o l - Nrtio-1 Technical I n f o r m t i o n Servic* U. S. D e p a r t u n t o f C o W t E P Sprinlf i a l d , v i + # i n b 22151 Thim r e p o r t naa p r e m r d a m an account of w x k mpon~ored by t h e United S t r t a a Goverrmmnt. Neithnr t h e Unltad S t a t e s nor the United Statem Atomic Energy Caminisaion, nor any of t h e i r employeem, nor any of t h e i r contractor#, subcontrac- t o r # , o r t h e i r eaployeea, makes any varranty, -press or implied, o r assumem any legal l i a b i l i t y o r r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e accuracy. completsnnsn or usefulness of any infor- mation apparatus, product or precesa disclosed, or r

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

/ / m - 1 2 0 6 7 4 Department of Energy Oak Ridge *rations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-8723 September 19, 1994 Hr. Saul Gleiser Ohio H i s t o r i c a l Society H i s t o r i c Preservation D i v i s i o n 1982 Yelma Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43211-2497 Dear Mr. Gleiser: ASSOCIATE AIRCRAFT SITE - NHPA (SECTION 106) DETERHINATION I n accordance w i t h Section 106 o f the National H i s t o r i c Preservation Act (NHPA), the Department o f Energy (WE) has determined t h a t the proposed removal o f r a d i o l o g i c a l contamination a t the former Associate A i r c r a f t s i t e located a t 3660 D i x i e Highway, F a i r f i e l d , Ohio, w i l l have no e f f e c t on properties included, o r e l i g i b l e f o r inclusion, on the National Register o f H i s t o r i c Places. A description o f proposed s i t e a c t i v i t i e s i s enclosed, along w

282

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

10 G 10 G . Drexel/ M. Poligone F i l e no. 7315/124 s b j e c t Determination of Additional D o t e Contaminated Areas at AAS March 17, 1994 Copies to J. Allison G. Palau K. Thompson A. John At Oak Ridge Ext. 6-5173 The purpose of this memorandum is t o provide results from characterization activities at the Former Associated Aircraft Site (AAS) in Fairfield, Ohio. Additional areas of contamination requiring remediation were identified during these activities. Areas that are currently known to exhibit elevated readings, and were not in the original scope of work are shown in Figure 3. To summarize, the areas added are located in the following areas; North of Zone V in the bathroom area (north of the locker room) and the office (located north of the caged area)

283

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY BACKQROUND RESEARCH REPORT Off-NfS Cukural Rasowcmr Studks: Background Research for Project Shot11 Prepared by Maureen King Alvin R. McLane and William Gray Johnson MAY 1993 DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY BACKGROUND RESEARCH REPORT Off-NTS Cultural Resources Studies: Background Research for Project Shoal Prepared by Maureen King Alvin R. McLane and William Gray Johnson Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Las Vegas, Nevada This document is UNCLASSIFIED Derivative , , ::/>.: ; , . / I : Classifier - & ? " A . + - = / . /.. Desert Research Institute ate.:^^:,'& MAY 1993 The work upon which this report is based was supporred by the U.S. Department of h e r g y under Contract #DE-AC08-90NV10845

284

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 111II1111111111111111111111111 1 111II1111111111111111111111111 GSB WW06 Floodplains and Wetlands Survey Results for the Gasbuggy and Gnome-Coach Sites, New Mexico December 1993 y :

285

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OEce of Radiation and OEce of Radiation and 12nvirorunentai Protection Indoor Ailr Washington., DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2000: R'ULISON Tes,t Site Area RLO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Tes it Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site, Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2000 RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area by Max G. Davis Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11969 UDIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY OFFICE OF RADIATION AND INDOOR AIR U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY P.O. BOX 98517 LAS VEGAS, NV 89193-8517 NOTICE

286

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

~overnment ~overnment Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office memorandum DATE: January 19. 1995 SUBIECT: USE OF EXEHPTIOW FROW DEPhRTnEKl OF ENERGY ORDER 5820.2A F O R RADIOhCTIVE WASTE FROn FUSlUl To: James A. Turi , Director, O f f i c e o f Program Support, O f f i c e o f the Deputy Assistant Secretary Waste Clanagelent, M-33, TREY I I This m r a n d u n serves t o n o t i f y 01-33 o f the F o m r l y U t i l i z e d Sites Remedial Action Program's (FUSRAP] i n t e n t t s dispose o f radioactive waste a t a cormercial disposal f a c i l i t y . I n compl iance w i t h the authorization (1. P. G r d l y t o Managers WE Operations Offices dated 10/12/93), the following information i s being provided p r i o r t o comnencement o f the Associate A i r c r a f t , F a i r f i e l d , Ohio, waste stream 2027-01. Waste type: S o i l , vacuum b

287

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

, . . - . . t e d Copj UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Faderal Center, Llcewood, Colorado 80225 BATHYMETRY OF CANNIKIN LAKE, AnCRITU ISLAND. ALASKA, WITH AN EVALUATION OF COMPUTER MAPPING TECHNIQUES Don Digeo GonerLee, Leonard E. Wollltz, and G. E . Brerhauer CONTENTS Page A b s t r a c t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . , . . . . . 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Acknowl.edgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Geologic and hydrologic s e t t i n g . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . 5 Effects of Cannikin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Bathymetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Computerlnepping techniques . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . , . . 9 Comparison o f computer-mapping techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . .

288

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ill lllIlllllllllllllllllllllllIII1 Ill lllIlllllllllllllllllllllllIII1 SHL 000035 Letter Report Contaminant Boundary at the Shoal Underground Nuclear Test prepared by Greg Pohll and Karl Pohlmann Division of Hydrologic Sciences Desert Research Institute University and Community College System of Nevada submitted to Nevada Sitc O f i c e National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Deparuncnt of Enagy Las Vegas, Nevada August 6,2004 The work upon which this report is based was suppomd by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract #DE-AC52-OONVI3609; intended for limited distribution. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, n~anuC;lcturcr, or otherwise, does not necussuily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, 01. favoring by the Unitcd States Govcmmcnl or any agcncy thereof ur its

289

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

~ ~ ~erivation of ~uidelines for Uranium Residual Radioactive Material in soil at the B&T Metals Company Site, Columbus,. Ohio Environmental Assessment Division f i Argonne National Laborgory Operated by The Unlvenlty of ChCago. under Contract w-31-109-Eng-38, lor tne United States Department of Energy Derivation of Guidelines for Uranium Residual Radioactive Material in Soil at the B&T Metals Company Site, Columbus, Ohio by S. Kamboj. M. Nimmagadda, and C. Yu Env~ronmental Assessment Division. Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue. Argonne. Illinois 60439 January 1996 Work sponsored by U.S. Depanment of Energy. Office of Environmental Restoration, Washington, D.C. ; CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

290

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

2 Velma Avenue 2 Velma Avenue Columbus, 0h.o 4321 1-2497 6141297-2300 Fax: 297-241 1 OH I 0 HISTORICAL SOCIETY SlSCE 1885 February 23, 1996 David G. Adler, Site Manager F o m r Sites Restoration Division Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. 80x 200T Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 -8723 Dear Mr. Adler: Re: 8 8 T Metal Building, Columbus, Ohio This is in response to your correspondence, received on February 22, 1996, regarding the project noted above. My staff has reviewed carefully the information provided. Based on the description of the proposed work and photographs provided, it is my opinion that the proposed work, if completed as proposed, will have no effect on the integrity of the B 8 T Metal building, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C. No further coordination with

291

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

902 902 GEN-BKS - - - . I 111 111 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l Ill SHL 000024 United States Office of Radiation and EPA-402-R-94-001 Environmental Protection Indoor Air January 2004 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2003: SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RI0 BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2003 SHOAL Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area GASBUGGY Test Site Area GNOME Test Site Area Max G. Davis Terry L. Mouck Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy under Interagency Agreement DE-,4108-96NV11969 RADIATION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS NATIONAL LABORATORY

292

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Bechtel Bechtel Inferoffice Memorandum TO G. L. Palau Subject Scoping Notice:' Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing., Inc . Site, Fairf ield, Ohio copies to T. E. Morris G. R. Gale W & J. S. Allison File No. 7440/124 Date November 1, 1994 Frcm D. D. Sexton MS of ES &H ~t Oak Ridge ~ x t . 4-3643 SCOPING NOTICE INTRODUCTION The purpose of this scoping notice is to formalize the identification and application of federal and state rules and regulations that may apply to the cleanup of the Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Site at 3660 Dixie Highway (hereinafter referred to as the Fairfield Site), in Fairfield, Ohio. This environmental compliance evaluation is based on information contained in the Radiological Survey of the site which provides the nature and extent

293

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

T T O G. L. Palau Subject Scoping Notice: The B&T Metals Site, Columbus, Ohio F i l s No. 744011 13 ~ a t t February 26, 1996 F P m l D. D. Sexton b of Environmental Compliance EX^. Oak Ridge ~t 4-3643 BACKGROUND The purpose of this Scoping Notice is to formalize the identification and evaluate the application of federal and state rulcs and regulations that apply to the cleanup of the B&T Metals site, located in Columbus, Ohio. This environmental compliance evaluation is based on information contained in the Designation Summary of the site (CCN 095792), which provides the nature and extent of radiological contamination, and upon an Engineering and Technology preliminary draft characterization report which identifies the presence and type of chemical and radioactive mixed waste present at the site.

294

Title  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

External Developments Division External Developments Division Do financial investors destabilize oil prices? The opinions expressed here are personal and not necessarily shared by the ECB or the Eurosystem Energy Information Administration 24 August 2011 by Marco J. Lombardi and Ine van Robays European Central Bank and Ghent Univeristy 2 Motivation * Oil price surged with increasing momentum between 2003-2008 before falling in the wake of the financial crisis and the subsequent economic downturn. After that, prices recovered again. * Oil price increases came against the background of surging demand and stagnating supply. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 2000M01 2001M01 2002M01 2003M01 2004M01 2005M01 2006M01 2007M01 2008M01 2009M01 2010M01 spot oil price in USD/barrel 3 Financialization of oil * The financialization

295

title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

April 21, 2003 April 21, 2003 April 21, 2003 Bakul Banerjee Bakul Banerjee Project Engineer Project Engineer MOU/SOW MOU/SOW NEU MOU and FY03 SOW are waiting for Mont's signature. SOW NEU MOU and FY03 SOW are waiting for Mont's signature. SOW contains work for three engineers. contains work for three engineers. Princeton FY03 SOW and Caltech FY03 SOW were signed in March. Princeton FY03 SOW and Caltech FY03 SOW were signed in March. Caltech FY03 SOW and MOU will be modified to include T2 Caltech FY03 SOW and MOU will be modified to include T2 operations work after UCSD and UFL MOUs are approved. operations work after UCSD and UFL MOUs are approved. UCDavis UCDavis FY03SOW was signed by Dr. Ko and waiting for FY03SOW was signed by Dr. Ko and waiting for Bauerdick

296

TITLE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Watec Resources Canter Watec Resources Canter 1 I EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW AND TRANSPORT AT THE FAULTLESS UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR TEST, CENTRAL NEVADA TEST AREA I prepared by I Karl P o h l m a ~ , Jenny Chapman, Ahmed Hassan, and Charalambos Papelis ! submitted to Nevada Operations M c e U.S. Department of Energy SEPTEMBER 1999 Publication No. 45165 @ C F J C This report uas prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any o f their contractors, subaontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express M implied, or assumes any It@ Liability or responsibility for the accuracy, oompletenesr, or any third party's use or the results of such use of m

297

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients 1 Outline of Presentation * Basic Background on Recovery Act * OMB Reporting Requirements * Timeline * Jobs Guidance * FederalReporting.gov * Available Resources * Detailed Review of Reporting Template and Field by Field Guidance 2 Overview On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, along with an Executive Order establishing the Economic Recovery Advisory Board

298

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Value Propositions for Four Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California EESAT 2007 San Francisco by Distributed Utility Associates, Inc. Jim Eyer, Senior Analyst jim@dua1.com Susan Horgan, President susan@dua1.com Funded by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). EESAT 2007 - Eyer - DUA 2 Agenda * Scope * Background * Assessing Value Propositions * Supercapacitor for Sacramento Light Rail * Supercapacitor for Load & DG Integration * Flow Battery for T&D Deferral * Flywheel for Area Regulation * Outlook EESAT 2007 - Eyer - DUA 3 Scope * DOE ESS partnership with CEC/PIER - innovative electricity storage demonstrations in California that are sponsored by CEC/PIER * DUA: Evaluation and Report

299

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Brad Tomer Brad Tomer Director, Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil EPACT Section 999 Federal Advisory Committee Meetings January 28-29, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil * Create public benefits by investing in research that industry would not take on itself * Deliver a balanced portfolio of technology to: - Enable Independents to efficiently produce discovered resources - Conduct long-term/high risk R&D - develop entirely new sources of supply - Minimize environmental impact Implement science and technology programs that resolve the environmental, supply and reliability constraints of oil and natural gas resources and enhance our energy security A multi-discipline, long-term, high-risk, and high-reward endeavor that

300

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee Recommendations - 2007 Annual Plan Brad Tomer, Director Strategic Center for Natural Gas & Oil January 30, 2008 Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Federal Advisory Committee Recommendations for 2007 Draft Plan * All recommendations were accepted - Incorporated into the final 2007 Annual Plan - Addressed in an otherwise appropriate manner * This review is designed to briefly re-state summarized recommendations and DOE's response. Detailed discussions should be deferred until later in the day. Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee Sub-Groups * R&D Theme Content * Solicitation Process * Environmental * Access Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil UDAC Recommendations for 2007 Plan

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

CHAPTER lV CHAPTER lV 1. PURPOSE. This chapter presents radiological protection requirements and guidelines for cleanup of residual radioactive material and management of the resulting wastes and residues and release of property. These requirements and guidelines are applicable at the time the property is released. Property subject to these criteria indudes, but is not limited to sacs identied by the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) and the Surplus Facilities Management Program (SFMP). The topics covered are basic dose limits, guidelines and authorized limits for allowable levels of residual radioadive material, and control of the radioactive wastes and residues. This chapter does not apply to uranium mill tailings or to properties covered by mandatory legal requirements.

302

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

e ~ a r t m e n t of Energy Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge. Tennessee 37831- November 7, 1995 Dave To1 b e r t B&T Metals Company & B&T F l o o r Company P. 0 . Box 163520 Columbus, Ohio 43216-3520 Dear M r . To1 b e r t : REAL ESTATE LICENSE REORDOER-7-96-0103, B&T METALS COHPANY, COLUMBUS, OH Enclosed f o r your records i s a copy o f the f u l l y executed 1 icense between B&T Metals Company and the Department o f Energy. Is t h e separate l i c e n s e f o r B&T F l o o r Company a l s o being transmitted t o t h i s o f f i c e ? Thank you f o r your cooperation and assistance i n t h i s action. I f you have any questions concerning t h e r e a l e s t a t e instrument, please f e e l f r e e t o contact m e a t 423- 576-0977. Sincerely, Katy Kates Realty O f f i c e r Enclosure As stated

303

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Date: 11/21/35 10:12:16 AM Date: 11/21/35 10:12:16 AM 136930 From: HARTMANGSOoro.doe.gov Subject: Re: CX Determination - B&T Metals Removal Action (FUSRAP-036 HOW about this! This is the first CX determination that we have done electronically - - - same-day turnaround!!! Gary Forwarding routing: Les Price, PSRD Bill Seay, FSRD Dave Adler, PSRD Loren Marz, PSRD Gerry Palau. BNI Dave Sexton, BNI Teresa Noe, BNI (PDCC) Forward Header :~Liject: Re: CX Determination - B&T Metals Removal Action (PUSPAP-036 i~thor: PHILLIPSPW at SE31 8 s 1-5 : 11/21/95 12:OO PM Based on the recommendation of Gary Hartman, Environmental Scientist, EW93, I determine that the subject proposed action is categorically excluded from further NEPA review and documentation. Patricia W. Phillips

304

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

. . · MONTICELLO NPL SITES FFA QUARTERLY REPORT: January 1- March 31, 2007 DOE Site Manager: Jalena Maestas 1.0 MMTS Activities/Status Repository and Pond 4 * Monthly and quarterly inspection of the repository identified no problems other than shrub damage by voles (inspection checklists attached). * Monthly inspection of Pond 4 identified no unacceptable conditions. * Pond 4 leachate detection and removal systems operated at normal levels (leachate pumping summary attached). * Repository leachate collection and removal system (LCRS) and leachate collection system (LDS) operated at normal levels (leachate pumping summary attached). * Equipment purchased to upgrade repository LCRS and LDS remote sensing and telemetry system. * Portions of repository cover were manually re-seeded with desirable shrubs to repair areas

305

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

M M A U h G E D 0 1 M M l N Y A R I E I ENERGY SYSTEMS. IYC. FOR THE U.S. O E P A R I M E I I T OF ENEnOY June 14, 1994 POST OFFICE BOX 2006 OAK RIDGE. TENNESSEE 37831 Dr. W. A. Williams EM-421 Trevion II Building Department of Energy Washington, D. C. 20585 Dear Dr. Williams: T r i p Report: Radiological Survey of Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company Site, Fairfield, Ohio (FOHOOl), M a y 31 and June 1,1994 On May 31 and June I, a radiological survey was conducted in the area surveyed during the March 7, 1994 survey in the referenced facility. This letter provides the results of that survey. Survey methods consisted of a beta-gamma survey of the surface of the concrete as the floor covering material was being removed by a construction contractor to begin renovation of the former

306

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

RIDOH RIDOH NArnONAL LABORATORY c- Results of the Independent Radiological Verification Survey I.* K . . . . 1 A . T I r n * at the Former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing Company Site, Fairfield, Ohio - (FOH001) D . E . Rice M . E . Murray K. S . Brown EEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH DMSION E ' * I ~ m d w a s k M ~ t ~ ~ ~ ( ~ N o . E X Z D 2 0 0 1 O; AB131DM) Aircraft ~ o o l and Manrlaet~ring Company Site, Fiirfleld, Oh10 (FOH001) D. E. Rice, M. E. Mumy, K:S. Brown . . . . lmza@am Tam R D. FdeJr-E-tAppholboPl4DCrdDPllLlltW D. E . Rice - Suvsy Tam iada 1 3 9 3 1 9 CONTENTS .................................................. LISTOFFI- v .................................................. LISTOFTABLES 6 A C K N O - S ............................................. u ABSTRACT ....................................................... xi

307

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Verification Verification Survey at B&T Metals, 425 West Town Street, Columbus, Ohio M. E. Murray V. P. Patania C. A. Johnson This report h s ken rcpmduccd directly from the t f s i avail3ble copy. Avaihble to DOE and DOE c o n m u x s from the Olficc of Scienlific and Technical inlormaliar. P.O. Boa 6 1 . W Ridsee. l X 378331: priccsav&lable from (6t5) 576-8101, TTS 6268401. A v ~ i t b I e t o h e public lmm the Naliorul Technical Inlormalion Service. U.S. Dcpvtmenl 01 Commcrcc. 5285 Pon Royal Rd.. Springlield. VA 22161. This rcpon was prep& as an account o f work sponsored by an agency o f thc Unircd Sutcs Govcmmcnr. X c i h c ~ thc Uniicd Sulcs Govcrnmcn~ nor any ;Igcncy, Lhcrcol. nor any of theu crnployccs, mikes my warmly. cxprcss, or implicd.or assumcs my legal l i i i l

308

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Peccrdei et .... g:~.g-..o*c *ck .*,- Peccrdei et .... g:~.g-..o*c *ck .*,- &.-. fi+ E C 7 ---.----.- .-.... 3$rS --------- ixx4!30 F A ~ 953 ' 27565' glla 5tcpEe.l. Peeorder Reception N o . - STATE OF COtOPA00 COUFlTY OF GARFIELD MfEREAS, under date of kcember 7 , 1966, an oil and gas l e a s e was entered i n t o between Claude V. Hayward, lessor, snd Rustrat dl1 Ccmpany Incorporated, Lessee, covering, among other l a n d s , t a t 1 1 , being the Northeast Quarter ~b the Southwest Q u a r t e r o f Section 25, f - 7 4 , R-95-W, Garfield County, Calnrnda, sa3d lease being recorded O n 86ak 381, Fag? 418, o f the ~rritdrd$ of B a r f leld County, C s l o r e d ~ ; and @ WWEEA., under date o f l%y 5 , 1967, a U n l t Agrarmnt fas the Dcvelapmnt and Opcratlon o f the Rulison Vn4 t Area I n Gsrfield and He58 Counties Colorado, was entered 1 nto betwen Aus t r

309

Title  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recipients Recipients For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or go to: http://www.FederalReporting.gov 1 Outline of Presentation * Timeline * Helpful Hints for Repeat Reporters * When is FederalReporting.gov Reporting Complete? * FederalReporting.gov Features For more information, contact DOE at: https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov or 1-888-363-7289 or

310

Title:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

closer to the sun. Its location at the center of the Earth is what makes its average temperature warmer than any other place on Earth, because the equator always receives direct...

311

TITLE  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

the CUDA toolkit has placed the NVIDIA GPUs abreast to the contemporary High Performance Computing (HPC) technologies. Among the NVIDIA CUDA enabled GPUS, the Tesla series is...

312

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TAKE- s - United States Department of' h e Interior - - FISH AND WII.,DLIFE SEKWC:E am I I 4600 Kiotrk. Lam, Building C-125 -no, e v a d a 89502-5093 SHL 000036 January 13,...

313

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

V. Lida V. Stonewall Flat Sarcobatus Flat Gold Flat Cactus Flat Stone Cabin V. Little Fish Lake V. Antelope V. (Eureka & Nye) Stevens Basin Diamond V. Newark V. Little Smoky V....

314

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

RESBARCH CKNTER ALBANY, OREGON MARCH 1992 Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Field Office Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R2 19 49 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak...

315

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

ALBANY RESEARCH C E W R ALBANY, OREGON Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Field Office Under Contract No. DE-AC05-9 1OR2 19 4 9 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak...

316

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

RESEARCH CENTER ALBANY, OREGQN APRIL 1989 Prepared for UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE Under Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 H . E. Kaye, J. H ....

317

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

RECORD i 002031 MISSISSIPPIAN PALEOGEOGRAPH* AND CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPH* OF THE WESTERN UNITED STATES Forrest: G. Poolc U.S. Geological Survey Box 25046, MS 90S Federal...

318

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

TEST CELL "C" LEACH FIELD TEST CELL "C" LARGE STORAGE TANK TEST CELL "C" SMALL STORAGE TANKS TEST CELL "C" NUCLEAR FURNACH PIPING AREA 25 (400) '*ROCKET -DEVELOP** STATION...

319

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

so (little hill). They were: 55. Wuniakuda, a place 2 or 3 miles east of the Ammonia Tanks (Tuna'kuwa, low hill) at about 6,000 feet, where TSt's mother's sister's family...

320

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Hinrichs, E.N., R.D. Krushensky and S.J. Luft, 1967. Geologic Map of the Ammonia Tanks Quadrangle, Nye County, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Quadrangle Map...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

center predominate at this site, as well. The predominant rocks include the Ammonia Tanks and Topopah Spring tuffs and ash-flow tuffs. There are also exposures of clastic...

322

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

to radionuclides, and they come fiom a wide variety of sources ranging from leaking tanks to underground nuclear tests. All of these problems have in common the need to...

323

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

45 Yucca Wash Sites 46 Site 8-Yucca Wash Quarry (26Ny1011), 47 Site 9-Sever Tanks (26Ny 1964) 49 Site 10-Yellow Rockshelters 51 Site 11 - Boulder Rockshetters 52...

324

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

were analyzed for radioactive content. Sediment samples from suspect severe, septic tanks, and drain lines were also analyzed. All soil, water, and sediment samples were...

325

Title:  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

8-1 1, 1997, Innsbruck, Austrai 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA Gaithersburg, MD, USA Germany 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA DISCLAIMER This...

326

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

a nesaage dated June 12, 1978, from Hugh D . Guthrie, Acting Director, Division of Oil, Gas and Shale Technology, to 8. W. Taft, Assistant Kanager for Plans, Engineering and...

327

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

e r n m o s t 29 a c r e s of t h e p r o p e r t y : a 2 - a c r e , i n a c t i v e BioMass R e s e a r c h F a c i l i t y , l o c a t e d n e a r t h e c e n t e r of t h e p...

328

((Title))  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

make them ideal for applications in the storage of energies generated by intermittent energy sources such as windmills and solar cells. The electric double-layer capacitor (EDLC)...

329

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

conference. The final Sampling and Quality Assurance Plans shall be approved by the Contracting Officer prior to commencement of field work. 7 . 0 FIELDWORK The Contractor shall...

330

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

b i l l e t s . A record review i d e n t i f i e s s i g n i f i c a n t MED control o f operations and conduct o f environmental r e s t o r a t i o n . Therefore, WE has the a u...

331

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Geologic map of the Nevada Test Site, Southern Nevada. Geographic Features of NTS and upland Areas. Author Frizzell, Jr. V.A. and J. Shulters 101056 Document Date 1190 Document...

332

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ill Cultural Resources Survey of the U. S. Department of Energy Gasbuggy Stimulation Test Site Rio Arriba County, New Mexico December 1 993 Environmental Restoration I 1 A Class...

333

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Ecological studies of vertebrates in plutonium-contaminated areas of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) were initiated in March, 1972, and have continued to date. In September,...

334

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Noteworthy Mammal Distribution Records for the Nevada Test Site (RE: "Great Basin Naturalist" 50(1)) This report adds three new mammal species to the original 46 species that occur...

335

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

FLOOD POTENTIAL OF TOPOPAH WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, EASTERN PART OF JACKASS FLATS, NEVADA TEST SITE, SOUTHERN NEVADA By Rulon C. Christensen and Norman E. Spahr U.S. GEOLOGICAL...

336

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Baseline vegetation contamination at safety test sites on the NTS and Tonopah Test Range. Describes concentrations of transuranics onin native vegetation sampled on NTS and TTR in...

337

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington, DC 20460 Annual Water Sampling and Analysis, Calendar Year 2001: RULISON Test Site Area RIO BLANCO Test Site Area FAULTLESS Test Site Area SHOAL Test Site Area...

338

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

RECORD ADMIN RECORDS O HYDROGEOLOGIC CONTROLS ON THE MOVEMENT OF GRO AT THE NEVADA TEST SITE, NYE COUNTY, NEVADA-- A SUMMARY DESCRIPTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION Douglas...

339

((Title))  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

120 to 800 nm have been synthesized through direct self- polymerization and subsequent carbonization by Lu and co- workers. 6a Although the resultant carbon spheres have high...

340

Title:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3-5 Planting Trees http:education.arm.gov Planting Trees: Grades 3-5 2 Planting Trees Approximate Time 1 to 3 hours, depending upon amount of teacher modeling and depth required...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Title:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6-8 Making Clouds http:education.arm.gov Making Clouds: Grades 6-8 1 Making Clouds Approximate Time 1 hour Objective The objective of this activity is to investigate the...

342

Title:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Education and Outreach Lesson Plan Visit our online activities collection http:education.arm.gov Grade levels 9-12 Monsoon Convection Cells http:education.arm.gov Monsoon...

343

Title:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

is a common misunderstanding that the melting of the polar sea ice will cause the ocean level to rise. Background Information What is global warming? Our Earth's average...

344

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

within 1 m of the contaminated aaterfals during the entire 40 h. Using applicable conversion factors, gamma and beta-gamma survey measurements were used to calculate the...

345

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

. . . . . . . . 13 FIGURE 5: Building 3, Room 102, Hydraulic Press X35443 Indicating Measurement Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 FIGURE 6: Building 4...

346

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

i s t o document the selected approach t o s a t i s f y i n g environmental docmentat ion and comnuni ty re1 a t i o n s n q u l rements f o r t h e Albany Research Center...

347

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Plan for the Monticello NPL Sites Doc. No. S0038700 Page 3-14 U.S. Department of Energy Rev.O Rt>v n M

348

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

which are often given a negative connotation by many environmentalists but without alternative solutions to the problems. Radiation ecology attempts to address the many...

349

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

THE NEVADA TEST SITE During tlic course of ecological studies con- ducted tit the Atomic Energy Commission test site since 1939 in the vicinity of Mercury, Ne- vada, collections...

350

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

. 32. Global Environmental Monitoring System 1 * P.O. Box 30552 Nairobi, Kenya * 33. Ron Green 1 EG&GEnergy Measurements * P.O. Box 1912, MS V-01 I Las Vegas, NV 89125 " 34....

351

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

DECEMBER 1994 . This work was performed by EG&GEM for the United States Departments of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC08-93NV11265. ABSTRACT ' * ' ' ' ' ' ' This report presents...

352

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PREPARED FROM 1:24.000' SCALE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN AUGUST, 1991 BY E G 8 G ENERGY MEASUREMENTS, INC. TION ALLUVIAL FAN BOUNDARY BOUNDARY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE'...

353

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

EG&G Idaho, Inc., P.O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 and , T. P. O'Farrell EG&G Energy Measurements, Inc., 130 Robin Hill Road, Goleta, CA 93117 (Received 12 May 1987;...

354

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Valley 104 Eagle Valley 105 Carson Valley WALKER SYSTEM (17) 106 Antelope Valley 107 Smith Valley 108 Mason Valley 109 East Walker Area 110 Walker Lake Valley A. Schurz Subarea...

355

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Illinois 60439 Prepared bp R. A. Uynveen Associate Division Director, OHS W. H. Smith Senior Health Physicist C. . Sholeen Health Physicist A. L. Just- liealth Physicist K....

356

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

does it reflect the efforts of James L. Reveal, University of Maryland and the Smith- sonian Institution, whose contributions began with the first intensive plant...

357

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Amer i ca, V o l . 61, No. 5, pp. 1413-1432 (NNA.890714.0075). Hamilton, R. M., B. E. Smith, F. G. Fischer, and P. J. Papanek, 1971. Seismicity of the Pahute Mesa Area; Nevada...

358

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

of Energy. W a ' . L , : L - C ' , . ; k ' v k Giles to the public (Smith, et al., 1980). The west portion of the NTS was withdrawn from public use in October...

359

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The terminology for the pyroclastic rocks described in this report is that of Ross and Smith (1961) and Poole, Elston, and Carr (1965). I Several general characteristics of the...

360

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

by Terrestrial Plants." USEPA Technical Note. ORPI.V 76-2. Brctthaucr, E. W. , P. B. Smith, A. .). Cummings, C. B. Morgan, and* S. C. Black 1974. "Preliminary Report of the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

recommending three candidate sites for further consideration: Hanford, Washington; Deaf Smith, Texas; and Yucca Mountain, Nevada. When the present study was initiated (July 7,...

362

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

b v e low pcrmeabllities aad therefore do not readily transmit water to w e b Ph.1 md Smith 1983). T h e Albany area ia drained primarily by the Wbmette md Cnhpooin rivers (Fig....

363

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Main S u i t e 2 4 0 P o r t l a n d , OR 92704 ( 5 0 3 ) 326-3370 The Honorable Denny smith House of R e p r e s e n t a t i v e s 1213 Longworth House O f f i c e B u i l d i n...

364

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

into contact with environmental plutonium directly from the soil and not through a food-web intermediary. 404 TRANSURANIC, ELEMENTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT Several reviews on...

365

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

volume and concentration) any new radionuclides from Cambric might be detected at RNM-2S. Careshould be taken to see that the sensitivity of planned measurements of isotope...

366

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

entail "perpetual carem in the form of continuing environmental monitoring, custodial care, and maintenance. It should be noted, however, that the Transport to Hanford...

367

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

work. Subjects to be discussed will include types and levels of contamination, specific health and safety concerns, use of portable fire extinguishers, emergency response plan,...

368

Title:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in the atmosphere help to "trap" that heat. This process is also known as the "greenhouse effect." Sea Level and Global Warming Global temperature is believed to be gradually...

369

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

type of explosive. Thus, even if one assumed activation from several times as much thermonuclear yield as fission yield at NTS, radioactivity from the fission products would still...

370

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

manmade radionuclides from global fallout, that is, fallout from high-yield U.S. thermonuclear tests in the Pacific and tests conducted by other countries. (The contribution of...

371

TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CITY/CO{TRIBAL): CITY/CO{TRIBAL): DATE RECEIVED: BRIEF DESCRIPTION: NEPA REVIEWER NEPA DECISION (CX/ EAtEIS) : NHPA ISSUES NEPA/NHPA CONDITIONS: * ENERGY Oak Ridge Office AK-TRIBE-NATIVE VILLAGE OF NELSON LAGOON CO MP LETE 800145422 STATE : AK Tribe Round Two Review: 0 2/8/2010 Energy effiCiency retrofits on the tribal council office building (insulation, vapor barriers, drywall and supplies, T111 sidmg, hardware, paint and primer, and respirators) S.G. Thornton ex CX APPLIED: CX-EEC8G -004 SUBPART D REF 82.5,85.1 None NEPA Compliance Officer (NCO) Review, including consideration of extraordinary circumstances : ~n may be categorically excluded from further NEPA review. I have determined that the proposed action meets the requirements for categorical exclusion in Subpart D, Appendix A or B.

372

Title  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

External Developments Division Do financial investors destabilize oil prices? The opinions expressed here are personal and not necessarily shared by the ECB or the Eurosystem...

373

Title  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Oil and gas explosion near Yucca Mountain, Southern Nevada, (pg 1298-1315). Found in Proceeding of the Fifth International Conference, Las Vegas, NV, May 11-16, 1994. Author Grow,...

374

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J.-1{p Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

}:- }:- J.-1{p Project Information Project Title: Flowline leak @ 68-66-SX-34 Date: 1/26/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 011..- 1. What are the environmental Elimination of the flowline@ 68-66- SX-34. Dig up and locate leak. Take p ntaminated soil to land fann and impacts? record in log book. The duration of this project will be approx. 4-days. The equipment to be used is as follows backhoe, and welder. We will be eliminating the flowline and pumping to a tank set on location.So we don't 2. What is the legal location? have any leaks in the Mure. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below Is to be completed by the Project Lead and nwlewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

375

EIA - Supplement Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

10 10 Regional Energy Consumption and Prices by Sector Energy Consumption by Sector and Source Table 1. New England Excel Gif Table 2. Middle Atlantic Excel Gif Table 3. East North Central Excel Gif Table 4. West North Central Excel Gif Table 5. South Atlantic Excel Gif Table 6. East South Central Excel Gif Table 7. West South Central Excel Gif Table 8. Mountain Excel Gif Table 9. Pacific Excel Gif Table 10. Total United States Excel Gif Energy Prices by Sector and Source Table 11. New England Excel Gif Table 12. Middle Atlantic Excel Gif Table 13. East North Central Excel Gif Table 14. West North Central Excel Gif Table 15. South Atlantic Excel Gif Table 16. East South Central Excel Gif Table 17. West South Central Excel Gif Table 18. Mountain Excel Gif Table 19. Pacific

376

EIA - Supplement Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

09 09 Regional Energy Consumption and Prices by Sector Energy Consumption by Sector and Source Table 1. New England Excel Gif Table 2. Middle Atlantic Excel Gif Table 3. East North Central Excel Gif Table 4. West North Central Excel Gif Table 5. South Atlantic Excel Gif Table 6. East South Central Excel Gif Table 7. West South Central Excel Gif Table 8. Mountain Excel Gif Table 9. Pacific Excel Gif Table 10. Total United States Excel Gif Energy Prices by Sector and Source Table 11. New England Excel Gif Table 12. Middle Atlantic Excel Gif Table 13. East North Central Excel Gif Table 14. West North Central Excel Gif Table 15. South Atlantic Excel Gif Table 16. East South Central Excel Gif Table 17. West South Central Excel Gif Table 18. Mountain Excel Gif Table 19. Pacific

377

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

III III Rail Alignment EIS - Chapter 4 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management June 2008 Rail Alignment EIS DOE/EIS-0369 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page VOLUME I CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION CHAPTER 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES VOLUME II CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT VOLUME III CHAPTER 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4-2 4.1.1 Impacts Associated with the No-Action Alternative ....................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Action ................................................................. 4-3

378

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IV IV Rail Alignment EIS - Chapters 5 through 8 List of Preparers Glossary Reference List U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management June 2008 Rail Alignment EIS DOE/EIS-0369 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page VOLUME I CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION CHAPTER 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES VOLUME II CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT VOLUME III CHAPTER 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS VOLUME IV CHAPTER 5. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1.1 Regions of Influence ........................................................................................................ 5-1

379

Major Design Changes Late in Title II or early in Title III Can Be Costly  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Design Changes Late in Title II or Design Changes Late in Title II or early in Title III Can Be Costly PMLL Identifier: PMLL-2006-Y12-HEUMF-0001 (Source: User Submitted) Validator: Victoria Pratt Date: 4/24/2010 Contact: 202-586-7358 Statement: Expect increased costs as well as omissions and errors if significant design changes occur late in Title II or early in Title III Discussion: Numerous changes in design requirements late in Title II and early in Title III resulted in significant concurrency in the design-and-build process, making it difficult to avoid major schedule delays and meet commitments. Late in Title II, changes for the foundation and active confinement ventilation system resulted in areas of design immaturity, which led to further design changes and refinements in Title III. This necessitated major structural changes to address

380

COST AND QUALITY TABLES 95  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 Tables 5 Tables July 1996 Energy Information Administration Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy Washington DC 20585 This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or any other organization. Contacts The annual publication Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Utility Plants (C&Q) will no longer be pub- lished by the EIA. The tables presented in this docu- ment are intended to replace that annual publication. Questions regarding the availability of these data should be directed to: Coal and Electric Data and Renewables Division

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

MTS Table Top Load frame  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MTS Table Top Load frame MTS Table Top Load frame The Non-destructive Evaluation group operates an MTS Table Top Load frame for ultimate strength and life cycle testing of various ceramic, ceramic-matrix (FGI), carbon, carbon fiber, cermet (CMC) and metal alloy engineering samples. The load frame is a servo-hydraulic type designed to function in a closed loop configuration under computer control. The system can perform non-cyclic, tension, compression and flexure testing and cyclic fatigue tests. The system is comprised of two parts: * The Load Frame and * The Control System. Load Frame The Load Frame (figure 1) is a cross-head assembly which includes a single moving grip, a stationary grip and LVDT position sensor. It can generate up to 25 kN (5.5 kip) of force in the sample under test and can

382

CBECS 1992 - Building Characteristics, Detailed Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Detailed Tables Detailed Tables Detailed Tables Percent of Buildings and Floorspace by Census Region, 1992 Percent of Buildings and Floorspace by Census Region, 1992 The following 70 tables present extensive cross-tabulations of commercial buildings characteristics. These data are from the Buildings Characteristics Survey portion of the 1992 CBECS. The "Quick-Reference Guide," indicates the major topics of each table. Directions for calculating an approximate relative standard error (RSE) for each estimate in the tables are presented in Figure A1, "Use of RSE Row and Column Factor." The Glossary contains the definitions of the terms used in the tables. See the preceding "At A Glance" section for highlights of the detailed tables. Table Organization

383

Energy Information Administration (EIA) - Supplement Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6 6 1 to 116 Complete set of Supplemental Tables Complete set of Supplemental Tables. Need help, please contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Regional Energy Consumption and Prices by Sector Energy Consumption by Sector Table 1. New England Consumption & Prices by Sector & Census Division Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table 2. Middle Atlantic Consumption & Prices by Sector & Census Division Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table 3. East North Central Consumption & Prices by Sector & Census Division Tables. Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800. Table 4. West North Central

384

A technique for converting serial PCM data to computer formatted tape  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page I. Synchroni. zer-Formator Interface, II. Formator-Tape Transport Interface. 11 13 III. Flag Bits. 26 IV. Core Memory Specifications 37 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figures 1, Pield Data System at Panama City, Florida Page 2. Input Data Format... synchronizer and the formator are tabulated in Table I. TABLE I Synchronizer ? Formator Interface Designation Description Data Word An eight bit binary word (level) Parity A signal indicating the bit by bit status of the second shift register (pulse...

Kirst, Alfred

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

385

Peetz Table Wind Energy Center (3Q07) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Peetz Table Wind Energy Center (3Q07) Peetz Table Wind Energy Center (3Q07) Jump to: navigation, search Name Peetz Table Wind Energy Center (3Q07) Facility Peetz Table Wind Energy Center (3Q07) Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Florida Power & Light Co. Developer NextEra Energy Resources Energy Purchaser Xcel Energy Location Logan County CO Coordinates 40.98149°, -102.973891° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.98149,"lon":-102.973891,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

386

S&TR | April 2007: A New Block on the Periodic Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Article title: A New Block on the Periodic Table; photo of Dawn Shaughnessy. Livermore chemist Dawn Shaughnessy adds the most recently created element to the periodic table. SCIENTISTS from Lawrence Livermore working in collaboration with a team from the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia, have discovered element 118, the newest block on the periodic table. Lasting less than a millisecond before decaying and ultimately fissioning, element 118 is the latest element to be synthesized artificially. Why do scientists work so hard to create new elements that last for such a short time? According to chemist Dawn Shaughnessy from Livermore's Chemistry, Materials, and Life Sciences Directorate, "Each new element we discover provides more knowledge about the forces that bind nuclei and what

387

Formation Testing Techniques | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Formation Testing Techniques Formation Testing Techniques Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Technique: Formation Testing Techniques Details Activities (0) Areas (0) Regions (0) NEPA(0) Exploration Technique Information Exploration Group: Downhole Techniques Exploration Sub Group: Formation Testing Techniques Parent Exploration Technique: Downhole Techniques Information Provided by Technique Lithology: Stratigraphic/Structural: Hydrological: Thermal: Dictionary.png Formation Testing Techniques: No definition has been provided for this term. Add a Definition References No exploration activities found. Print PDF Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Formation_Testing_Techniques&oldid=601973" Categories: Downhole Techniques Exploration Techniques

388

FRAUD POLICY Table of Contents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FRAUD POLICY Table of Contents Section 1 - General Statement Section 2 - Management's Responsibility for Preventing Fraud Section 3 - Consequences for Fraudulent Acts Section 4 - Procedures for Reporting Fraud Section 5 - Procedures for the Investigation of Alleged Fraud Section 6 - Protection Under

Shihadeh, Alan

389

CHP NOTEBOOK Table of Contents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-Specific Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Section 8 Employee Training Section 9 Inspections and Exposure1 CHP NOTEBOOK Table of Contents Section 1 Safety Program Key Personnel Section 2 Laboratory Protective Equipment (PPE) Assessment Section 18 Hazard Assessment Information and PPE Selection Information

Braun, Paul

390

Microsoft Word - table_04.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 Table 4. Offshore gross withdrawals of natural gas by state and the Gulf of Mexico, 2009-2013 (million cubic feet) 2009 Total 259,848 327,105 586,953 1,878,928 606,403 2,485,331...

391

PARENT HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PARENT HANDBOOK 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Parent's Role 3 Academics 7 Academic Advising 7 Academic Services 26 Athletics, Physical Education and Recreation 28 Campus Resources and Student Services 30 to seeing you in person and connecting with you online! PARENT HANDBOOK THEPARENT'SROLE PARENT HANDBOOK 3

Adali, Tulay

392

Automatic Construction of Diagnostic Tables  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......more usual, at least in microbiology.) Keys and diagnostic tables...Mechanization and Data Handling in Microbiology, Society for Applied Bacteriology...by A. Baillie and R. J. Gilbert, London: Academic Press...cultures, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Vol. 14, pp. 271-279......

W. R. Willcox; S. P. Lapage

1972-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

News Release: 2010 UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites Reports  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites 2010 UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites Reports Available News Release: 2010 UMTRCA Title I and Title II Disposal Sites Reports Available February 23, 2011 - 9:51am Addthis News Contact: DOE, Rich Bush, UMTRCA Program Lead (970) 248-6073 Contractor, Bob Darr, S.M. Stoller Corporation Public Affairs (720) 377-9672 Grand Junction, Colo. - The U.S. Department of Energy announces the availability of the 2010 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites and the 2010 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites reports. In 2010, DOE's Office of Legacy Management was responsible for providing long-term surveillance and maintenance services at 25 uranium mill tailings

394

G Subject: Implementation of Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

B, Title III, Title V and Division C B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-74 References: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Title III, Section 301(a), 301(b), 316 Pub. L. No. 112-74 Title V, Sections 501, 504, 505 Title VII, Sections 725 When is this Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) effective? The statutory provisions addressed in this FAL were effective on the enactment date of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, December 23, 2011. When does this FAL expire? This FAL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the intended audience? Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Contracting Officers. Who is the point of contact?

395

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS Rail Alignment EIS - Chapters 1 and 2 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management June 2008 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor (DOE/EIS-0250F-S2; the Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS), and Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (DOE/EIS-0369; the Rail Alignment EIS) CONTACTS: For more information about this document, For general information on the DOE NEPA process,

396

crd title p1.ai  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SHEET SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation Corridor (DOE/EIS-0250F-S2D; the Nevada Rail Corridor SEIS), and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (DOE/EIS-0369D; the Rail Alignment EIS) CONTACTS: For more information about this document, write or call: For general information on the DOE NEPA process, write or call: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

397

Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4t 3 4t 3 l I Project lnfonnatlon Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date: 11-22-2010 DOE Code: 673()-()20-51141 Contractor Code: 8067-778 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. The purpose of the project is to test a tool that temporarily reduces the viscosity of oil which allows it to be 1. Brief project description ~nclude pumped through pipelines easier. The test will require about 4 miles of line to pump the oil through after anything that could impact the treatment (hence the need to connect the 31oops together), a holding volume for recovery, then repeat. environmenJ] There will be tanks to hold the original volume, tanks to receive the volume after treatment and pumping 2. Legal location through the line, possible transfer between tanks, transport (trucking) of the oil to the site (by the COC) and

398

An optimal filtering algorithm for table constraints  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Filtering algorithms for table constraints are constraint-based, which means that the propagation queue only contains information on the constraints that must be reconsidered. This paper proposes four efficient value-based algorithms for table constraints, ...

Jean-Baptiste Mairy; Pascal Van Hentenryck; Yves Deville

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Table Name query? | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Table Name query? Home > Groups > Databus Is there an API feature which returns the names of tables? Submitted by Hopcroft on 28 October, 2013 - 15:37 1 answer Points: 0 if you are...

400

The table of isotopes-8th edition and beyond  

SciTech Connect

A new edition of the Table of Isotopes has been published this year by John Wiley and Sons, Inc. This edition is the eighth in a series started by Glenn T. Seaborg in 1940. The two-volume, 3168-page, cloth-bound edition is twice the size of the previous edition published in 1978. It contains nuclear structure and decay data, based mainly on the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF), for >3100 isotopes and isomers. Approximately 24000 references are cited, and the appendices have been updated and extended. The book is packaged with an interactive CD-ROM that contains the Table of Isotopes in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format for convenient viewing on personal computer (PC) and UNIX workstations. The CD-ROM version contains a chart of the nuclides graphical index and separate indices organized for radioisotope users and nuclear structure physicists. More than 100000 hypertext links are provided to move the user quickly through related information free from the limitations of page size. Complete references with keyword abstracts are provided. The CD-ROM also contains the Table of Super-deformed Nuclear Bands and Fission Isomers; Tables of Atoms, Atomic Nuclei, and Subatomic Particles by Ivan P. Selinov; the ENSDF and nuclear structure reference (NSR) databases; the ENSDF manual by Jagdish K. Tuli; and Abode Acrobat Reader software.

Firestone, R.B. [Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, CA (United States)

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Chemistry Department Assessment Table of Contents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

0 Chemistry Department Assessment May, 2006 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 1 Prelude 1 Mission Statement and Learning Goals 1 Facilities 2 Staffing 3 Students: Chemistry Majors and Student Taking Service Courses Table: 1997-2005 graduates profile Table: GRE Score for Chemistry Majors, 1993

Bogaerts, Steven

402

TOPIC INTRODUCTION Title page Combining Ca2+  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 TOPIC INTRODUCTION Title page Combining Ca2+ Imaging with Other Optical Techniques SHORT TITLE: Ca2+ Imaging and Other Optical Techniques Marco Canepari 1,2 , Dejan Zecevic 4 , Kaspar E Vogt 3 Descartes, 75006 Paris, France Address correspondence to: marco.canepari@ujf-grenoble.fr ABSTRACT Ca2

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

403

Title II Disposal Sites Annual Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the results of long-term surveillance and maintenance activities conducted by the DOE Office of Legacy Management in 2013 at six uranium mill tailings disposal sites reclaimed under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978. These activities verified that the UMTRCA Title II disposal sites remain in compliance with license requirements.

404

Microsoft Word - table_11.doc  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

25 25 Table 11 Created on: 12/12/2013 2:10:53 PM Table 11. Underground natural gas storage - storage fields other than salt caverns, 2008-2013 (volumes in billion cubic feet) Natural Gas in Underground Storage at End of Period Change in Working Gas from Same Period Previous Year Storage Activity Year and Month Base Gas Working Gas Total Volume Percent Injections Withdrawals Net Withdrawals a 2008 Total b -- -- -- -- -- 2,900 2,976 76 2009 Total b -- -- -- -- -- 2,856 2,563 -293 2010 Total b -- -- -- -- -- 2,781 2,822 41 2011 January 4,166 2,131 6,298 -63 -2.9 27 780 753 February 4,166 1,597 5,763 -10 -0.6 51 586 535 March 4,165 1,426 5,591 -114 -7.4 117 288 172

405

Microsoft Word - table_08.doc  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1 1 Table 8 Created on: 12/12/2013 2:07:39 PM Table 8. Underground natural gas storage - all operators, 2008-2013 (million cubic feet) Natural Gas in Underground Storage at End of Period Change in Working Gas from Same Period Previous Year Storage Activity Year and Month Base Gas Working Gas Total a Volume Percent Injections Withdrawals Net Withdrawals b 2008 Total c -- -- -- -- -- 3,340 3,374 34 2009 Total c -- -- -- -- -- 3,315 2,966 -349 2010 Total c -- -- -- -- -- 3,291 3,274 -17 2011 January 4,303 2,306 6,609 2 0.1 50 849 799 February 4,302 1,722 6,024 39 2.3 82 666 584 March 4,302 1,577 5,879 -75 -4.6 168 314 146 April 4,304 1,788 6,092 -223 -11.1 312 100

406

Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration Action Codes Table | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Action Codes Table Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Nuclear Materials Management & Safeguards System > NMMSS Information, Reports & Forms > Code Tables > Action Codes Table

407

WWW Table of Radioactive Isotopes (TORI or ToI) from the Isotopes Project: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - Lund University Collaboration  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The handbook titled "Table of Isotopes" has long been a standard source of information for nuclear structure and decay data. This web page provides online access to the "Table of Isotopes" data. It provides specialized interfaces to search, including: 1) Radiation search - search for by energy range and/or parent properties; 2) Nuclide search - search for nuclides by A, Z, N, and/or half-life range; 3) Atomic data - search for X-rays and Auger electrons; 4) Periodic table interface to the nuclides; 5) Summary drawings for A=1-277 (PDF). This page also provides access to various other resources, including the WWW Table of Nuclear Structure where the user can interactively search adopted nuclear level and gamma-ray properties or display tables, level scheme ladder diagrams and nuclear charts.

R.B. Firestone (LBNL); L.P. Ekstrom (LUNDS Universitet); Chu, S.Y.F. (LBNL)

408

Description of Energy Intensity Tables (12)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3. Description of Energy Intensity Data Tables 3. Description of Energy Intensity Data Tables There are 12 data tables used as references for this report. Specifically, these tables are categorized as tables 1 and 2 present unadjusted energy-intensity ratios for Offsite-Produced Energy and Total Inputs of Energy for 1985, 1988, 1991, and 1994; along with the percentage changes between 1985 and the three subsequent years (1988, 1991, and 1994) tables 3 and 4 present 1988, 1991, and 1994 energy-intensity ratios that have been adjusted to the mix of products shipped from manufacturing establishments in 1985 tables 5 and 6 present unadjusted energy-intensity ratios for Offsite-Produced Energy and Total Inputs of Energy for 1988, 1991, and 1994; along with the percentage changes between 1988 and the two subsequent

409

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in B-100 Bone-equivalent plastic Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.52740 1.450 85.9 0.05268 3.7365 0.1252 3.0420 3.4528 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.435 7.435 7.443 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.803 5.803 1.360 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.535 4.535 2.543 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.521 3.521 5.080 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.008 3.008 8.173 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.256 2.256 2.401 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.115 2.115 3.319 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.971 1.971 5.287 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.889 1.889 8.408 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.859 0.000 1.859 1.376 × 10 2 314. MeV 4.065 × 10 2 1.859 0.000 1.859 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.866 0.000 1.866 1.913 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.940 0.000 0.000 1.940 4.016 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.973 0.000 0.000 1.974 5.037 × 10 2 1.40

410

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Sodium monoxide Na 2 O Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.48404 2.270 148.8 0.07501 3.6943 0.1652 2.9793 4.1892 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.330 6.330 8.793 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 4.955 4.956 1.601 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 3.883 3.884 2.984 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.024 3.024 5.943 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.588 2.588 9.541 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.954 1.954 2.789 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.840 1.840 3.846 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.725 1.725 6.102 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.663 1.664 9.656 × 10 1 283. MeV 3.738 × 10 2 1.646 0.000 1.647 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.647 0.000 1.647 1.571 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.659 0.000 1.660 2.177 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.738 0.000 0.000 1.738 4.531 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.771 0.000 0.000 1.772 5.670 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

411

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Tissue-equivalent gas (Propane based) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.55027 1.826 × 10 -3 59.5 0.09802 3.5159 1.5139 3.9916 9.3529 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 8.132 8.132 6.782 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.337 6.337 1.241 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.943 4.944 2.326 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.831 3.831 4.656 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.269 3.269 7.500 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.450 2.450 2.209 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.303 2.303 3.053 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.158 2.158 4.855 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 2.084 2.084 7.695 × 10 1 263. MeV 3.527 × 10 2 2.068 0.000 2.069 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 2.071 0.000 2.072 1.252 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 2.097 0.000 2.097 1.732 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.232 0.000 0.000 2.232 3.580 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.289 0.000 0.000 2.290

412

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Lead oxide (PbO) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.40323 9.530 766.7 0.19645 2.7299 0.0356 3.5456 6.2162 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 4.046 4.046 1.411 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.207 3.207 2.532 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 2.542 2.542 4.656 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.003 2.003 9.146 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 1.727 1.727 1.455 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.327 1.327 4.176 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.256 1.256 5.729 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.188 1.189 9.017 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.158 1.158 1.415 × 10 2 236. MeV 3.250 × 10 2 1.155 0.000 1.155 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.161 0.000 0.000 1.161 2.279 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.181 0.000 0.000 1.181 3.133 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.266 0.001 0.000 1.267 6.398 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.299 0.001 0.000 1.301 7.955 × 10 2 1.40

413

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Liquid argon (Ar) Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 18 (Ar) 39.948 (1) 1.396 188.0 0.19559 3.0000 0.2000 3.0000 5.2146 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 5.687 5.687 9.833 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 4.461 4.461 1.786 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 3.502 3.502 3.321 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.731 2.731 6.598 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.340 2.340 1.058 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.771 1.771 3.084 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.669 1.670 4.250 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.570 1.570 6.732 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.518 1.519 1.063 × 10 2 266. MeV 3.567 × 10 2 1.508 0.000 1.508 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.509 0.000 1.510 1.725 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.526 0.000 0.000 1.526 2.385 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.610 0.000 0.000 1.610 4.934 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.644 0.000 0.000 1.645 6.163

414

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Freon-13 (CF 3 Cl) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.47966 0.950 126.6 0.07238 3.5551 0.3659 3.2337 4.7483 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.416 6.416 8.659 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.019 5.019 1.578 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 3.930 3.930 2.945 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.057 3.057 5.870 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.615 2.615 9.430 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.971 1.971 2.760 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.857 1.857 3.809 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.745 1.745 6.041 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.685 1.685 9.551 × 10 1 283. MeV 3.738 × 10 2 1.668 0.000 1.668 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.668 0.000 1.668 1.553 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.681 0.000 1.681 2.151 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.762 0.000 0.000 1.763 4.473 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.796 0.000 0.000 1.797 5.596 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

415

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Lutetium silicon oxide [Lu 2 SiO 5 ] Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.42793 7.400 472.0 0.20623 3.0000 0.2732 3.0000 5.4394 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 4.679 4.679 1.209 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.692 3.693 2.181 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 2.916 2.916 4.029 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.287 2.287 7.953 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 1.968 1.968 1.270 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.503 1.503 3.666 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.421 1.422 5.038 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.344 1.344 7.944 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.308 1.308 1.248 × 10 2 242. MeV 3.316 × 10 2 1.304 1.304 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.309 0.000 0.000 1.309 2.014 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.329 0.000 0.000 1.329 2.773 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.415 0.001 0.000 1.416 5.684 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.449 0.001 0.000 1.450 7.080

416

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Boron oxide (B 2 O 3 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.49839 1.812 99.6 0.11548 3.3832 0.1843 2.7379 3.6027 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.889 6.889 8.045 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.381 5.381 1.468 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.208 4.208 2.744 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.269 3.269 5.477 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.794 2.794 8.807 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.102 2.103 2.583 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.975 1.975 3.567 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.843 1.843 5.674 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.768 1.768 9.010 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.742 0.000 1.742 1.472 × 10 2 307. MeV 3.990 × 10 2 1.742 0.000 1.742 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.750 0.000 1.750 2.045 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.822 0.000 0.000 1.823 4.285 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.854 0.000 0.000 1.855 5.373 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

417

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Liquid H-note density shift (H 2 ) Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 1 (H) 1.00794 (7) 7.080 × 10 -2 21.8 0.32969 3.0000 0.1641 1.9641 2.6783 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 16.508 16.508 3.316 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 12.812 12.812 6.097 × 10 -1 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 9.956 9.956 1.147 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 7.684 7.684 2.307 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 6.539 6.539 3.727 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 4.870 4.870 1.105 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 4.550 4.550 1.531 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 4.217 4.217 2.448 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 4.018 0.000 4.018 3.912 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 3.926 0.000 3.926 6.438 × 10 1 356. MeV 4.497 × 10 2 3.919 0.000 3.919 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 3.922 0.000 3.922 8.988 × 10 1 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 4.029 0.000 4.030 1.906 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 4.084 0.001

418

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Cortical bone (ICRP) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.52130 1.850 106.4 0.06198 3.5919 0.1161 3.0919 3.6488 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.142 7.142 7.765 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.581 5.581 1.417 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.366 4.366 2.646 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.393 3.393 5.281 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.900 2.901 8.489 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.179 2.179 2.489 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.044 2.044 3.440 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.907 1.907 5.475 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.830 1.830 8.700 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.803 0.000 1.803 1.422 × 10 2 303. MeV 3.950 × 10 2 1.803 0.000 1.803 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.812 0.000 1.812 1.976 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.888 0.000 0.000 1.889 4.138 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.922 0.000 0.000 1.923 5.187 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

419

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Freon-13B1 (CF 3 Br) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.45665 1.500 210.5 0.03925 3.7194 0.3522 3.7554 5.3555 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 5.678 5.678 9.844 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 4.454 4.454 1.788 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 3.498 3.498 3.325 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.729 2.729 6.606 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.339 2.339 1.059 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.771 1.771 3.086 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.671 1.671 4.251 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.574 1.574 6.729 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.524 1.524 1.062 × 10 2 266. MeV 3.567 × 10 2 1.513 0.000 1.513 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.515 0.000 1.515 1.721 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.531 0.000 0.000 1.532 2.378 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.616 0.000 0.000 1.616 4.919 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.650 0.001 0.000 1.651 6.142 × 10 2 1.40 GeV

420

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Sodium carbonate (Na 2 CO 3 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.49062 2.532 125.0 0.08715 3.5638 0.1287 2.8591 3.7178 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.575 6.575 8.449 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.142 5.142 1.540 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.026 4.026 2.874 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.131 3.131 5.729 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.679 2.679 9.204 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.017 2.017 2.695 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.895 1.895 3.721 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.771 1.772 5.914 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.703 1.703 9.381 × 10 1 298. MeV 3.894 × 10 2 1.681 0.000 1.681 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.681 0.000 1.681 1.531 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.690 0.000 1.691 2.125 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.764 0.000 0.000 1.764 4.440 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.796 0.000 0.000 1.797 5.563 × 10 2 1.40

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Tungsten hexafluoride (WF 6 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.42976 2.400 354.4 0.03658 3.5134 0.3020 4.2602 5.9881 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 4.928 4.928 1.143 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.880 3.880 2.067 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 3.057 3.057 3.828 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.393 2.393 7.574 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.056 2.056 1.211 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.565 1.565 3.509 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.479 1.479 4.827 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.396 1.396 7.623 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.353 1.353 1.200 × 10 2 253. MeV 3.431 × 10 2 1.346 0.000 1.346 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.349 0.000 0.000 1.349 1.942 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.367 0.000 0.000 1.367 2.679 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.451 0.001 0.000 1.452 5.516 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.485 0.001 0.000 1.486 6.877

422

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Standard rock Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.50000 2.650 136.4 0.08301 3.4120 0.0492 3.0549 3.7738 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.619 6.619 8.400 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.180 5.180 1.530 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.057 4.057 2.854 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.157 3.157 5.687 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.701 2.702 9.133 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.028 2.029 2.675 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.904 1.904 3.695 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.779 1.779 5.878 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.710 1.710 9.331 × 10 1 297. MeV 3.884 × 10 2 1.688 0.000 1.688 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.688 0.000 1.688 1.523 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.698 0.000 1.698 2.114 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.774 0.000 0.000 1.775 4.418 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.808 0.000 0.000 1.808 5.534 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502 × 10

423

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Ceric sulfate dosimeter solution Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.55279 1.030 76.7 0.07666 3.5607 0.2363 2.8769 3.5212 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.909 7.909 6.989 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.170 6.170 1.278 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.819 4.819 2.391 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.739 3.739 4.779 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.193 3.193 7.693 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.398 2.398 2.261 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.255 2.255 3.123 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.102 2.102 4.968 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 2.013 2.014 7.896 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.980 0.000 1.980 1.292 × 10 2 317. MeV 4.096 × 10 2 1.979 0.000 1.979 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.986 0.000 1.986 1.797 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.062 0.000 0.000 2.062 3.774 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.096 0.000 0.000 2.097 4.735 × 10

424

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Silicon Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 14 (Si) 28.0855 (3) 2.329 173.0 0.14921 3.2546 0.2015 2.8716 4.4355 0.14 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.363 6.363 8.779 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 4.987 4.987 1.595 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 3.912 3.912 2.969 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.047 3.047 5.905 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.608 2.608 9.476 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.965 1.965 2.770 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.849 1.849 3.822 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.737 1.737 6.064 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.678 1.678 9.590 × 10 1 273. MeV 3.633 × 10 2 1.664 0.000 1.664 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.665 0.000 1.666 1.559 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.681 0.000 1.681 2.157 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.767 0.000 0.000 1.768 4.475 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.803 0.000 0.000 1.804 5.595 × 10 2 1.40 GeV

425

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Polyethylene terephthalate (Mylar) (C 10 H 8 O 4 ) n Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.52037 1.400 78.7 0.12679 3.3076 0.1562 2.6507 3.3262 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.420 7.420 7.451 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.789 5.789 1.362 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.522 4.522 2.548 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.509 3.509 5.093 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.997 2.997 8.197 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.250 2.250 2.409 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.108 2.108 3.329 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.963 1.964 5.305 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.880 1.880 8.440 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.849 0.000 1.849 1.382 × 10 2 317. MeV 4.096 × 10 2 1.848 0.000 1.849 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.855 0.000 1.855 1.922 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.926 0.000 0.000 1.926 4.039 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.958 0.000 0.000 1.959

426

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Dichlorodiethyl ether C 4 Cl 2 H 8 O Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.51744 1.220 103.3 0.06799 3.5250 0.1773 3.1586 4.0135 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.117 7.117 7.789 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.561 5.561 1.421 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.349 4.349 2.655 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.380 3.380 5.300 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.889 2.889 8.521 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.174 2.174 2.499 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.042 2.042 3.450 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.907 1.907 5.486 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.832 1.832 8.708 × 10 1 298. MeV 3.894 × 10 2 1.807 0.000 1.807 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.807 0.000 1.807 1.422 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.817 0.000 1.817 1.974 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.895 0.000 0.000 1.896 4.129 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.930 0.000 0.000 1.931 5.174 × 10

427

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Lead Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 82 (Pb) 207.2 (1) 11.350 823.0 0.09359 3.1608 0.3776 3.8073 6.2018 0.14 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 3.823 3.823 1.524 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.054 3.054 2.705 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 2.436 2.436 4.927 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 1.928 1.928 9.600 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 1.666 1.666 1.521 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.283 1.283 4.338 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.215 1.215 5.943 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.151 1.152 9.339 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.124 1.124 1.463 × 10 2 226. MeV 3.145 × 10 2 1.122 0.000 1.123 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.130 0.000 0.000 1.131 2.352 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.151 0.000 0.000 1.152 3.228 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.237 0.001 0.000 1.238 6.572 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.270 0.001 0.000 1.272 8.165 × 10 2 1.40

428

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Sodium iodide (NaI) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.42697 3.667 452.0 0.12516 3.0398 0.1203 3.5920 6.0572 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 4.703 4.703 1.202 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.710 3.710 2.169 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 2.928 2.928 4.009 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.297 2.297 7.917 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 1.975 1.975 1.264 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.509 1.509 3.652 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.427 1.427 5.019 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.347 1.348 7.916 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.310 1.310 1.245 × 10 2 243. MeV 3.325 × 10 2 1.305 1.305 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.310 0.000 0.000 1.310 2.010 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.329 0.000 0.000 1.330 2.768 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.417 0.001 0.000 1.418 5.677 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.452 0.001 0.000 1.453 7.070 × 10 2 1.40 GeV

429

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Polyvinyl alcohol (C 2 H3-O-H) n Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.54480 1.300 69.7 0.11178 3.3893 0.1401 2.6315 3.1115 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.891 7.891 6.999 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.153 6.153 1.280 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.804 4.804 2.396 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.726 3.726 4.793 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.181 3.181 7.717 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.383 2.384 2.270 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.231 2.232 3.140 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.076 2.076 5.007 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.986 1.986 7.974 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.950 0.000 1.950 1.307 × 10 2 324. MeV 4.161 × 10 2 1.949 0.000 1.949 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.955 0.000 1.955 1.820 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.026 0.000 0.000 2.026 3.830 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.059 0.000 0.000 2.059 4.809 × 10 2 1.40

430

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Cesium Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 55 (Cs)132.9054519 (2) 1.873 488.0 0.18233 2.8866 0.5473 3.5914 6.9135 0.14 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 4.464 4.464 1.277 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.532 3.532 2.294 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 2.794 2.794 4.224 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.195 2.195 8.315 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 1.890 1.890 1.325 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.444 1.444 3.820 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.366 1.366 5.248 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.291 1.291 8.274 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.257 1.257 1.300 × 10 2 236. MeV 3.250 × 10 2 1.254 1.254 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.261 0.000 0.000 1.261 2.096 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.284 0.000 0.000 1.285 2.882 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.378 0.001 0.000 1.380 5.881 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.415 0.001 0.000 1.417 7.311 × 10 2

431

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Propane (C 3 H 8 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.58962 1.868 × 10 -3 47.1 0.09916 3.5920 1.4339 3.8011 8.7939 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 8.969 8.969 6.137 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.982 6.982 1.125 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 5.441 5.441 2.109 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 4.212 4.213 4.228 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.592 3.592 6.815 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.688 2.688 2.010 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.525 2.526 2.780 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.365 2.365 4.424 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 2.281 2.281 7.018 × 10 1 267. MeV 3.577 × 10 2 2.262 0.000 2.263 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 2.265 0.000 2.265 1.143 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 2.291 0.000 2.291 1.582 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.434 0.000 0.000 2.435 3.275 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.495 0.000 0.000 2.496 4.086 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

432

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Polystyrene ([C 6 H 5 CHCH 2 ] n ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.53768 1.060 68.7 0.16454 3.2224 0.1647 2.5031 3.2999 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.803 7.803 7.077 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.084 6.084 1.294 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.749 4.749 2.424 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.683 3.683 4.848 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.144 3.144 7.806 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.359 2.359 2.296 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.210 2.211 3.174 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.058 2.058 5.059 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.970 1.971 8.049 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.937 0.000 1.937 1.318 × 10 2 318. MeV 4.105 × 10 2 1.936 0.000 1.936 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.942 0.000 1.943 1.834 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.015 0.000 0.000 2.015 3.856 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.048 0.000 0.000 2.049 4.841 × 10 2 1.40

433

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Air (dry, 1 atm) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.49919 1.205 × 10 -3 85.7 0.10914 3.3994 1.7418 4.2759 10.5961 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.039 7.039 7.862 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.494 5.495 1.436 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.294 4.294 2.686 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.333 3.333 5.366 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.847 2.847 8.633 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.140 2.140 2.535 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.013 2.014 3.501 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.889 1.889 5.562 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.827 1.827 8.803 × 10 1 257. MeV 3.471 × 10 2 1.815 0.000 1.816 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.819 0.000 1.819 1.430 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.844 0.000 1.844 1.977 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.968 0.000 0.000 1.968 4.074 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.020 0.000 0.000 2.021 5.077 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

434

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Lead tungstate (PbWO 4 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.41315 8.300 600.7 0.22758 3.0000 0.4068 3.0023 5.8528 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 4.333 4.333 1.311 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.426 3.426 2.360 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 2.710 2.711 4.350 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.131 2.131 8.566 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 1.835 1.835 1.365 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.406 1.406 3.931 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.331 1.331 5.397 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.261 1.261 8.498 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.231 1.231 1.333 × 10 2 227. MeV 3.154 × 10 2 1.229 1.230 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.237 0.000 0.000 1.238 2.145 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.260 0.000 0.000 1.260 2.946 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.349 0.001 0.000 1.350 6.007 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.383 0.001 0.000 1.385 7.469 × 10 2 1.40

435

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Carbon (compact) Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 6 (C) [12.0107 (8)] 2.265 78.0 0.26142 2.8697 -0.0178 2.3415 2.8680 0.12 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.116 7.116 7.772 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.549 5.549 1.420 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.331 4.331 2.658 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.355 3.355 5.318 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.861 2.861 8.567 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.126 2.127 2.531 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.991 1.992 3.505 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.854 1.854 5.597 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.775 1.775 8.917 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.745 0.000 1.745 1.462 × 10 2 317. MeV 4.096 × 10 2 1.745 0.000 1.745 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.751 0.000 1.751 2.034 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.819 0.000 0.000 1.820 4.275 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.850 0.000 0.000 1.851 5.365 × 10

436

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Methanol (CH 3 OH) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.56176 0.791 67.6 0.08970 3.5477 0.2529 2.7639 3.5160 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 8.169 8.169 6.759 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.369 6.369 1.236 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.972 4.972 2.315 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.855 3.855 4.631 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.291 3.291 7.457 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.469 2.469 2.194 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.321 2.322 3.032 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.166 2.166 4.823 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 2.074 2.074 7.664 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 2.039 0.000 2.039 1.254 × 10 2 318. MeV 4.105 × 10 2 2.038 0.000 2.039 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 2.045 0.000 2.045 1.744 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.121 0.000 0.000 2.122 3.665 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.156 0.000 0.000 2.157 4.600 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502 ×

437

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Carbon (amorphous) Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 6 (C) 12.0107 (8) 2.000 78.0 0.20240 3.0036 -0.0351 2.4860 2.9925 0.10 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.117 7.117 7.771 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.550 5.551 1.420 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.332 4.332 2.658 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.357 3.357 5.317 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.862 2.862 8.564 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.129 2.129 2.529 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.994 1.994 3.502 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.857 1.857 5.591 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.778 1.779 8.905 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.749 0.000 1.749 1.459 × 10 2 313. MeV 4.055 × 10 2 1.749 0.000 1.749 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.755 0.000 1.756 2.030 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.824 0.000 0.000 1.825 4.266 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.855 0.000 0.000 1.856 5.353 × 10

438

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Mix D wax Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.56479 0.990 60.9 0.07490 3.6823 0.1371 2.7145 3.0780 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 8.322 8.322 6.628 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.485 6.486 1.213 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 5.060 5.060 2.273 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.922 3.922 4.549 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.347 3.347 7.327 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.505 2.506 2.158 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.346 2.346 2.985 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.182 2.182 4.761 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 2.087 2.087 7.584 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 2.049 0.000 2.049 1.243 × 10 2 328. MeV 4.201 × 10 2 2.048 0.000 2.048 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 2.053 0.000 2.053 1.731 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.125 0.000 0.000 2.125 3.647 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.158 0.000 0.000 2.159 4.581 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502 × 10 3 2.213

439

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Sodium nitrate NaNO 3 Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.49415 2.261 114.6 0.09391 3.5097 0.1534 2.8221 3.6502 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.702 6.702 8.281 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.239 5.239 1.510 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.100 4.100 2.820 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.187 3.187 5.624 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.726 2.726 9.039 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.053 2.053 2.648 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.927 1.927 3.656 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.800 1.800 5.814 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.729 1.729 9.228 × 10 1 298. MeV 3.894 × 10 2 1.705 0.000 1.705 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.705 0.000 1.705 1.507 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.714 0.000 1.714 2.092 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.787 0.000 0.000 1.787 4.377 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.819 0.000 0.000 1.819 5.486 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

440

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Freon-12B2 (CF 2 Br 2 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.44901 1.800 284.9 0.05144 3.5565 0.3406 3.7956 5.7976 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 5.330 5.330 1.053 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 4.190 4.190 1.908 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 3.297 3.297 3.540 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 2.577 2.577 7.017 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.212 2.212 1.123 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.680 1.680 3.263 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.586 1.586 4.491 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.496 1.496 7.099 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.452 1.452 1.118 × 10 2 252. MeV 3.421 × 10 2 1.445 0.000 1.445 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.448 0.000 1.449 1.809 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.467 0.000 0.000 1.468 2.496 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.556 0.000 0.000 1.557 5.139 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.592 0.001 0.000 1.593 6.409 × 10 2 1.40 GeV

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Eye lens (ICRP) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.54977 1.100 73.3 0.09690 3.4550 0.2070 2.7446 3.3720 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.912 7.912 6.984 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 6.171 6.171 1.277 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.819 4.819 2.390 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.738 3.738 4.779 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.192 3.192 7.693 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.396 2.396 2.262 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.251 2.251 3.125 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 2.095 2.096 4.976 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 2.006 2.006 7.914 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.971 0.000 1.971 1.296 × 10 2 318. MeV 4.105 × 10 2 1.971 0.000 1.971 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.977 0.000 1.977 1.803 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 2.051 0.000 0.000 2.051 3.790 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 2.085 0.000 0.000 2.085 4.756 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502 × 10

442

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Compact bone (ICRU) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.53010 1.850 91.9 0.05822 3.6419 0.0944 3.0201 3.3390 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.406 7.406 7.477 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.783 5.783 1.365 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.521 4.521 2.552 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.511 3.511 5.097 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 3.000 3.000 8.199 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.247 2.247 2.408 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.106 2.106 3.330 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.962 1.962 5.307 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.880 1.880 8.444 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.849 0.000 1.850 1.382 × 10 2 314. MeV 4.065 × 10 2 1.849 0.000 1.849 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.856 0.000 1.857 1.922 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.930 0.000 0.000 1.930 4.036 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.963 0.000 0.000 1.964 5.063 × 10 2 1.40 GeV 1.502

443

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Polyimide film (C 22 H 10 N 2 O 5 ) n Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.51264 1.420 79.6 0.15972 3.1921 0.1509 2.5631 3.3497 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.299 7.299 7.576 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.695 5.695 1.385 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.449 4.449 2.590 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.453 3.453 5.177 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.949 2.949 8.332 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.214 2.214 2.448 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.074 2.074 3.384 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.932 1.932 5.392 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.851 1.851 8.577 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.820 0.000 1.820 1.404 × 10 2 314. MeV 4.065 × 10 2 1.820 0.000 1.820 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.826 0.000 1.827 1.953 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.897 0.000 0.000 1.898 4.102 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.929 0.000 0.000 1.930 5.147 × 10 2 1.40

444

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Silicon dioxide (fused quartz) (SiO 2 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.49930 2.200 139.2 0.08408 3.5064 0.1500 3.0140 4.0560 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 6.591 6.591 8.438 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.158 5.158 1.537 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.041 4.041 2.866 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.145 3.145 5.710 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.691 2.691 9.170 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.030 2.030 2.682 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.908 1.908 3.701 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.786 1.786 5.878 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.719 1.719 9.315 × 10 1 288. MeV 3.788 × 10 2 1.699 0.000 1.699 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.699 0.000 1.699 1.518 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.711 0.000 1.711 2.105 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.789 0.000 0.000 1.790 4.391 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.823 0.000 0.000 1.824 5.497

445

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Radon Z A [g/mol] ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 86 (Rn) [222.01758 (2)]9.066 × 10 -3 794.0 0.20798 2.7409 1.5368 4.9889 13.2839 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 3.782 3.782 1.535 × 10 0 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 3.018 3.018 2.730 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 2.405 2.405 4.980 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 1.902 1.902 9.715 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 1.644 1.644 1.540 × 10 1 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 1.267 1.267 4.394 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 1.201 1.201 6.019 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.140 1.140 9.452 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.116 1.117 1.479 × 10 2 216. MeV 3.039 × 10 2 1.116 1.116 Minimum ionization 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.127 0.000 0.000 1.128 2.372 × 10 2 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.154 0.000 0.000 1.154 3.249 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.258 0.001 0.000 1.260 6.559 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.300 0.001 0.000 1.302 8.119

446

Table  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Muons Muons in Solid carbon dioxide (dry ice; CO 2 ) Z/A ρ [g/cm 3 ] I [eV] a k = m s x 0 x 1 C δ 0 0.49989 1.563 85.0 0.43387 3.0000 0.2000 2.0000 3.4513 0.00 T p Ionization Brems Pair prod Photonucl Total CSDA range [MeV/c] [MeV cm 2 /g] [g/cm 2 ] 10.0 MeV 4.704 × 10 1 7.057 7.057 7.841 × 10 -1 14.0 MeV 5.616 × 10 1 5.508 5.508 1.432 × 10 0 20.0 MeV 6.802 × 10 1 4.304 4.304 2.679 × 10 0 30.0 MeV 8.509 × 10 1 3.341 3.341 5.353 × 10 0 40.0 MeV 1.003 × 10 2 2.854 2.854 8.612 × 10 0 80.0 MeV 1.527 × 10 2 2.145 2.145 2.529 × 10 1 100. MeV 1.764 × 10 2 2.017 2.017 3.493 × 10 1 140. MeV 2.218 × 10 2 1.886 1.886 5.554 × 10 1 200. MeV 2.868 × 10 2 1.812 1.812 8.811 × 10 1 300. MeV 3.917 × 10 2 1.787 0.000 1.787 1.438 × 10 2 303. MeV 3.950 × 10 2 1.787 0.000 1.787 Minimum ionization 400. MeV 4.945 × 10 2 1.795 0.000 1.795 1.997 × 10 2 800. MeV 8.995 × 10 2 1.866 0.000 0.000 1.866 4.182 × 10 2 1.00 GeV 1.101 × 10 3 1.896 0.000 0.000 1.897 5.245 × 10

447

The collision of Title III and Title V: A potential permitting and enforcement nightmare  

SciTech Connect

The Clean Air Act of 1990 (CAA) mandated that all facilities classified as major were to obtain a Federal Title V operating permit. In addition, any facility, either major or minor, which emits certain chemicals or compounds above a specific single quantity limit or a total aggregate limit are subject to Title III requirements and are required to obtain a Title V permit as well. The problem with obtaining a Title V permit for Title III substances is there is limited data, at least for the utilities sources, on emission factors and emission rates for many of the Title III listed chemical compounds. In addition, the emission data that exists is very conservative, and if used, would show the facilities to be significant emitters of hazardous air emissions, while actual emissions are significantly less. This could lead a facility to applying for a Title V permit unnecessarily, a time consuming process at best. In Iowa, facilities submitted the first Title V permit applications in 1994. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources is currently in the process of reviewing the submittals prior to issuing operating permits. Title III has not been addressed at all in the submittals and therefore will not be included in this round of finished permits that are to be issued. The outcome of this is that the Title V permits will have to be opened and amended to include the applicable Title III operating conditions and constraints. This paper will examine the areas where Title III and Title V collide and the potential permitting and enforcement issues that will have to be faced by the facilities that operate under these permits. This paper is based on the opinions of two of the three responsible parties (facilities and consultants) that are dealing with the potential permitting and enforcement wreckage before the collision occurs.

Facca, G.; Faler, M.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

448

Title 40 CFR 261 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Waste (2014). Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleTitle40CFR261IdentificationandListingofHazardousWaste&oldid793417" Categories: References...

449

TAC Title 30 - Environmental Quality | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

TAC Title 30 - Environmental Quality Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: TAC Title 30 - Environmental...

450

Author Ziegler, Susan Benner, Ronald Title Effects of solar radiation ...  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Author Ziegler, Susan Benner, Ronald Title Effects of solar radiation on dissolved ... M. Title Declining carrying capacity in the Bering Sea: Isotopic evidence from...

451

Variable White Dwarf Data Tables  

SciTech Connect

Below, I give a brief explanation of the information in these tables. In all cases, I list the WD {number_sign}, either from the catalog of McCook {ampersand} Sion (1987) or determined by me from the epoch 1950 coordinates. Next, I list the most commonly used name (or alias), then I list the variable star designation if it is available. If not, I list the constellation name and a V** or?? depending on what the last designated variable star for that constellation is. I present epoch 2000 coordinates for all of the stars, which I precessed from the 1950 ones in most cases. I do not include proper motion effects; this is negligible for all except the largest proper motion DAV stars, such as L 19-2, BPM 37093, B 808, and G 29-38. Even in these cases, the error is no more than 30` in declination and 2 s in right ascension. I culled effective temperatures from the latest work (listed under each table); they are now much more homogeneous than before. I pulled the magnitude estimates from the appropriate paper, and they are mean values integrated over several cycles. The amplitude given is for the height of a typical pulse in the light curve. The periods correspond the dominant ones found in the light curve. In some cases, there is a band of power in a given period range, or the light curve is very complex, and I indicate this in the table. In the references, I generally list the paper with the most comprehensive pulsation analysis for the star in question. In some cases, there is more than one good reference, and I list them as well.

Bradley, P. A.

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

452

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

processes to promote development and operation of sustainable buildings. #12;Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Sustainable Building Policy Policy this electronic policy and the written copy held by the policy owner, the written copy prevails. Sustainable

Haykin, Simon

453

Title: China Dimensions Data Collection Data Creator /  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Title: China Dimensions Data Collection Data Creator / Copyright Owner: Center for International holds wide range of natural science and socioeconomic research and educational activities of China. These databases are integrated with agricultural, land use, environmental, socioeconomic data to track China

454

February 25, 2014 POSITION TITLE: Community Director  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

; regulating safety operations; performing collateral tasks including staff selection, training and developmentFebruary 25, 2014 POSITION TITLE: Community Director PERSONNEL STATUS: Exempt, Full-Time, Regular the management and administration of daily residential community operations; providing crisis response; serving

Maryland, Baltimore County, University of

455

COURSE TITLES COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Organizational Behavior &  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

COURSE TITLES COURSE DESCRIPTIONS MGT 5371 Organizational Behavior & Organizational Design Examines management of individual, interpersonal, group and intergroup relations, organizational design and experiential learning to accelerate their development as authentic leaders. MGT 5373 Opportunity Creation

Rock, Chris

456

Microsoft Word - table_08.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 8. Supplemental Gas Supplies by State, 2008 (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado ......................... 0 2 0 6,256 6,258 Delaware ........................ 0 2 0 0 2 Georgia........................... 0 * 0 0 * Hawaii............................. 2,554 5 0 0 2,559 Illinois.............................. 0 15 0 0 15 Indiana............................ 0 30 0 0 30 Iowa ................................ 0 24 3 0 27 Kentucky......................... 0 15 0 0 15 Maryland ......................... 0 181 0 0 181 Massachusetts................ 0 13 0 0 13 Minnesota ....................... 0 46 0 0 46 Missouri .......................... * 6 0 0 6 Nebraska ........................ 0 28 0 0 28 New Hampshire .............. 0 44 0 0 44 New Jersey ..................... 0 0 0 489 489 New York ........................

457

Microsoft Word - table_08.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 8. Supplemental Gas Supplies by State, 2009 (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado ......................... 0 3 0 7,525 7,527 Connecticut..................... 0 * 0 0 * Delaware ........................ 0 2 0 0 2 Georgia........................... 0 0 52 * 52 Hawaii............................. 2,438 9 0 0 2,447 Illinois.............................. 0 20 0 0 20 Indiana............................ 0 * 0 0 * Iowa ................................ 0 3 0 0 3 Kentucky......................... 0 18 0 0 18 Maryland ......................... 0 170 0 0 170 Massachusetts................ 0 10 0 0 10 Minnesota ....................... 0 47 0 0 47 Missouri .......................... * 10 0 0 10 Nebraska ........................ 0 18 0 0 18 New Jersey ..................... 0 0 0 454 454 New York ........................

458

Microsoft Word - table_08.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 8. Supplemental Gas Supplies by State, 2010 (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado ......................... 0 4 0 5,144 5,148 Delaware ........................ 0 1 0 0 1 Georgia........................... 0 0 732 0 732 Hawaii............................. 2,465 6 0 0 2,472 Illinois.............................. 0 17 0 0 17 Indiana............................ 0 1 0 0 1 Iowa ................................ 0 2 0 0 2 Kentucky......................... 0 5 0 0 5 Louisiana ........................ 0 0 249 0 249 Maryland ......................... 0 115 0 0 115 Massachusetts................ 0 * 0 0 * Minnesota ....................... 0 12 0 0 12 Missouri .......................... * 18 0 0 18 Nebraska ........................ 0 12 0 0 12 New Jersey ..................... 0 0 0 457 457 New York ........................

459

Microsoft Word - table_08.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 8. Supplemental Gas Supplies by State, 2007 (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado ......................... 0 3 0 6,866 6,869 Delaware ........................ 0 5 0 0 5 Georgia........................... 0 2 0 0 2 Hawaii............................. 2,679 4 0 0 2,683 Illinois.............................. 0 11 0 0 11 Indiana............................ 0 81 0 554 635 Iowa ................................ 0 2 38 0 40 Kentucky......................... 0 124 0 0 124 Maryland ......................... 0 245 0 0 245 Massachusetts................ 0 15 0 0 15 Minnesota ....................... 0 54 0 0 54 Missouri .......................... 7 60 0 0 66 Nebraska ........................ 0 33 0 0 33 New Hampshire .............. 0 9 0 0 9 New Jersey ..................... 0 0 0 379 379 New York ........................

460

Table-top job analysis  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Handbook is to establish general training program guidelines for training personnel in developing training for operation, maintenance, and technical support personnel at Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. TTJA is not the only method of job analysis; however, when conducted properly TTJA can be cost effective, efficient, and self-validating, and represents an effective method of defining job requirements. The table-top job analysis is suggested in the DOE Training Accreditation Program manuals as an acceptable alternative to traditional methods of analyzing job requirements. DOE 5480-20A strongly endorses and recommends it as the preferred method for analyzing jobs for positions addressed by the Order.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

What every designated representative should know about Title IV and Title V enforcement provisions  

SciTech Connect

Title IV of the Clean Air Act not only created a regulatory program unlike any other under the Clean Air Act, but also established a unique position--the designated representative--as an integral part of the program. The designated representative is required to meet certain basic obligations under Title IV, and a panoply of enforcement mechanisms are available to EPA in the event of noncompliance with these obligations. Also, because a designated representative may take on responsibilities under the permit provisions of Title V of the Clean Air Act, the designated representative can also be subject to an enforcement action for failure to comply with certain Title V permit requirements. This paper considers the basic definition of the designated representative under EPA`s Title IV and Title V regulations, identifies the responsibilities assigned to the designated representative, and then analyzes the enforcement mechanisms that may be applied to the designated representative if a regulatory responsibility has not been satisfied.

Bischoff, C.A. [Gallagher and Kennedy, Phoenix, AZ (United States); Dayal, P. [Tucson Electric Power Co., Tucson, AZ (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

462

Title I Disposal Sites Annual Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the results of long-term surveillance and maintenance activities conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) in 2013 at 19 uranium mill tailings disposal sites established under Title I of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978. These activities verified that the UMTRCA Title I disposal sites remain in compliance with license requirements.

463

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, October 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, August 1991  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (August 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M., Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, September 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Environmental regulatory update table, July 1991  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (July 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November 1990  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Hawkins, G.T.; Houlberg, L.M.; Noghrei-Nikbakht, P.A.; Salk, M.S.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Major Design Changes Late in Title II or early in Title III Can...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

avoid major schedule delays and meet commitments. Late in Title II, changes for the foundation and active confinement ventilation system resulted in areas of design immaturity,...

470

Microsoft Word - table_09.doc  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3 3 Table 9 Created on: 12/12/2013 2:08:24 PM Table 9. Underground natural gas storage - by season, 2011-2013 (volumes in billion cubic feet) Natural Gas in Underground Storage at End of Period Change in Working Gas from Same Period Previous Year Storage Activity Year, Season, and Month Base Gas Working Gas Total Volume Percent Injections Withdrawals Net Withdrawals a 2011 Refill Season April 4,304 1,788 6,092 -223 -11.1 312 100 -212 May 4,304 2,187 6,491 -233 -9.6 458 58 -399 June 4,302 2,530 6,831 -210 -7.7 421 80 -340 July 4,300 2,775 7,075 -190 -6.4 359 116 -244 August 4,300 3,019 7,319 -134 -4.2 370 126 -244 September 4,301 3,416 7,717 -92 -2.6 454 55

471

All Price Tables.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1) 1) June 2013 State Energy Price and Expenditure Estimates 1970 Through 2011 2011 Price and Expenditure Summary Tables Table E1. Primary Energy, Electricity, and Total Energy Price Estimates, 2011 (Dollars per Million Btu) State Primary Energy Electric Power Sector g,h Retail Electricity Total Energy g,i Coal Natural Gas a Petroleum Nuclear Fuel Biomass Total g,h,i Distillate Fuel Oil Jet Fuel b LPG c Motor Gasoline d Residual Fuel Oil Other e Total Wood and Waste f Alabama 3.09 5.66 26.37 22.77 25.54 27.12 13.18 19.42 25.90 0.61 3.01 8.75 2.56 27.08 19.85 Alaska 3.64 6.70 29.33 23.12 29.76 31.60 20.07 34.62 26.61 - 14.42 20.85 6.36 47.13 25.17 Arizona 1.99 7.07 27.73 22.84 31.95 26.97 17.00 17.23 26.71 0.75 6.31 10.79 2.16 28.46 25.23 Arkansas 1.93 6.94 26.37 22.45 26.66 27.35 17.35 33.22

472

Microsoft Word - table_13.doc  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Natural Gas Monthly 31 Table 13 Created on: 12/12/2013 2:28:44 PM Table 13. Activities of underground natural gas storage operators, by state, September 2013 (volumes in million cubic feet) State Field Count Total Storage Capacity Working Gas Storage Capacity Natural Gas in Underground Storage at End of Period Change in Working Gas from Same Period Previous Year Storage Activity Base Gas Working Gas Total Volume Percent Injections Withdrawals Alabama 2 35,400 27,350 8,050 21,262 29,312 2,852 15.5 1,743 450 Alaska a 5 83,592 67,915 14,197 20,455 34,652 NA NA 1,981 30 Arkansas 2 21,853 12,178 9,648 3,372 13,020 -1,050 -23.7 204 0 California 14 599,711 374,296

473

All Consumption Tables.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4) 4) June 2007 State Energy Consumption Estimates 1960 Through 2004 2004 Consumption Summary Tables Table S1. Energy Consumption Estimates by Source and End-Use Sector, 2004 (Trillion Btu) State Total Energy b Sources End-Use Sectors a Coal Natural Gas c Petroleum Nuclear Electric Power Hydro- electric Power d Biomass e Other f Net Interstate Flow of Electricity/Losses g Residential Commercial Industrial b Transportation Alabama 2,159.7 853.9 404.0 638.5 329.9 106.5 185.0 0.1 -358.2 393.7 270.2 1,001.1 494.7 Alaska 779.1 14.1 411.8 334.8 0.0 15.0 3.3 0.1 0.0 56.4 63.4 393.4 266.0 Arizona 1,436.6 425.4 354.9 562.8 293.1 69.9 8.7 3.6 -281.7 368.5 326.0 231.2 511.0 Arkansas 1,135.9 270.2 228.9 388.3 161.1 36.5 76.0 0.6 -25.7 218.3 154.7 473.9 288.9 California 8,364.6 68.9 2,474.2 3,787.8 315.6 342.2

474

All Consumption Tables.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) June 2011 State Energy Consumption Estimates 1960 Through 2009 2009 Consumption Summary Tables Table C1. Energy Consumption Overview: Estimates by Energy Source and End-Use Sector, 2009 (Trillion Btu) State Total Energy b Sources End-Use Sectors a Fossil Fuels Nuclear Electric Power Renewable Energy e Net Interstate Flow of Electricity/ Losses f Net Electricity Imports Residential Commercial Industrial b Transportation Coal Natural Gas c Petroleum d Total Alabama 1,906.8 631.0 473.9 583.9 1,688.8 415.4 272.9 -470.3 0.0 383.2 266.0 788.5 469.2 Alaska 630.4 14.5 344.0 255.7 614.1 0.0 16.3 0.0 (s) 53.4 61.0 325.4 190.6 Arizona 1,454.3 413.3 376.7 520.8 1,310.8 320.7 103.5 -279.9 -0.8 400.8 352.1 207.8 493.6 Arkansas 1,054.8 264.1 248.1 343.1 855.3 158.7 126.5 -85.7 0.0 226.3 167.0 372.5

475

Microsoft Word - table_01.doc  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3 3 Table 1 Table 1. Summary of natural gas supply and disposition in the United States, 2008-2013 (billion cubic feet) Year and Month Gross Withdrawals Marketed Production NGPL Production a Dry Gas Production b Supplemental Gaseous Fuels c Net Imports Net Storage Withdrawals d Balancing Item e Consumption f 2008 Total 25,636 21,112 953 20,159 61 3,021 34 2 23,277 2009 Total 26,057 21,648 1,024 20,624 65 2,679 -355 -103 22,910 2010 Total 26,816 22,382 1,066 21,316 65 2,604 -13 115 24,087 2011 January 2,299 1,953 92 1,861 5 236 811 R -24 R 2,889 February 2,104 1,729 82 1,647 4 186 594 R 20 R 2,452 March 2,411 2,002 95 1,908 5 171 151 R -4 R 2,230 April 2,350 1,961 93 1,868 5 R 152 -216 R 17 R 1,825 May 2,411 2,031

476

Microsoft Word - table_02.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 2. Natural gas production, transmission, and consumption, by state, 2012 (million cubic feet) U.S. Energy Information Administration | Natural Gas Annual 4 Table 2 Alabama 215,710 7,110 -162,223 617,883 0 -2,478 0 666,738 Alaska 351,259 21,470 22,663 0 -9,342 0 0 343,110 Arizona 117 0 -13,236 389,036 -43,838 0 0 332,079 Arkansas 1,146,168 424 -18,281 -831,755 0 -103 0 295,811 California 246,822 12,755 104,820 2,222,355 -109,787 48,071 0 2,403,385 Colorado 1,709,376 81,943 -107,940 -1,077,968 0 2,570 4,412 443,367 Connecticut 0 0 4,191 225,228 0 260 0 229,159 Delaware 0 0 21,035 80,692 0 51 * 101,676 District of Columbia 0 0 497 28,075 0 0 0 28,572 Florida 18,681 0 15,168 1,294,620 0 0 0 1,328,469

477

TableHC2.12.xls  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Detached Attached 2 to 4 Units Energy Information Administration: 2005 Residential Energy Consumption Survey: Preliminary Housing Characteristics Tables Million U.S. Housing...

478

TableHC10.13.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

or More... 0.3 Q Q Q Q Lighting Usage Indicators U.S. Census Region Northeast Midwest Table HC10.13 Lighting Usage...

479

TABLE54.CHP:Corel VENTURA  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Administration (EIA) Forms EIA-812, "Monthly Product Pipeline Report," and EIA-813, Monthly Crude Oil Report." Table 54. Movements of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products by Pipeline...

480

TABLE19.CHP:Corel VENTURA  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Table 19. PAD District IV-Year-to-Date Supply, Disposition, and Ending Stocks of Crude Oil and Petroleum (Thousand Barrels) January-July 2004 Products, Crude Oil...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "table title format" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

TABLE15.CHP:Corel VENTURA  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Table 15. PAD District III-Year-to-Date Supply, Disposition, and Ending Stocks of Crude Oil and Petroleum (Thousand Barrels) January-July 2004 Products, Crude Oil...

482

TABLE53.CHP:Corel VENTURA  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Table 53. Movements of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products by Pipeline, Tanker, and Barge Between July 2004 Crude Oil ... 0 383 0...

483

TABLE11.CHP:Corel VENTURA  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

(Thousand Barrels) Table 11. PAD District II-Year-to-Date Supply, Disposition, and Ending Stocks of Crude Oil and Petroleum January-July 2004 Products, Crude Oil...

484

2011 Annual Report Table of Contents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) ...................12 Smart Grid Cyber Security.....................................................13 ICT Supply ChainComputer Security Division 2011 Annual Report #12;Table of Contents Welcome ................................................................. 1 Division Organization .................................................2 The Computer Security

485

Summary Statistics Table 1. Crude Oil Prices  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Cost Report." Figure Energy Information Administration Petroleum Marketing Annual 1996 3 Table 2. U.S. Refiner Prices of Petroleum Products to End Users (Cents per Gallon...

486

GIS DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Table of Contents  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

GIS DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Volume II Table of Contents SURVEY OF AVAILABLE DATA Introduction ...................................................................................13 EVALUATING GIS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE Introduction ...................................................................................14 Sources of Information About GIS......................................................14 GIS

Ghelli, Giorgio

487

Nuclear Decay Data in the MIRD (Medical Internal Radiation Dose) Format  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

MIRD is a database of evaluated nuclear decay data for over 2,100 radioactive nuclei. Data are extracted from ENSDF, processed by the program RadList, and used for medical internal radiation dose calculations. When using the MIRD interface, tables of nuclear and atomic radiations from nuclear decay and decay scheme drawings will be produced in the MIRD format from the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) for the specified nuclide. Output may be either HTML-formatted tables and JPEG drawings, PostScript tables and drawings, or PDF tables and drawings.

488

Full Name: Vicki Gray, PT, PhD Title(s): UMANRRT PostDoctoral Fellow  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Full Name: Vicki Gray, PT, PhD Title(s): UMANRRT PostDoctoral Fellow Email: vgray and Rehabilitation Sciences in the field of Physical Therapy. Her Ph.D. thesis focused on the motor control of fast continued to work in Dr Jayne Garland's Neural Control of Force Production and Movement Lab

Weber, David J.

489

Microsoft Word - table_07.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 7. Natural Gas Processed, Liquids Extracted, and Estimated Extraction Loss by State, 2005 Alabama .................................. 255,157 9,748 13,759 37,048 Alaska...................................... 3,089,229 23,700 27,956 105,449 Arkansas.................................. 16,756 177 231 786 California ................................. 226,230 11,101 13,748 45,926 Colorado .................................. 730,948 25,603 34,782 95,881 Florida...................................... 3,584 359 495 1,400 Illinois....................................... 280 37 46 129 Kansas..................................... 476,656 22,165 31,521 85,737 Kentucky.................................. 38,792 1,411 1,716 5,725 Louisiana ................................. 2,527,636 73,035 103,381

490

Microsoft Word - table_05.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 5. Number of Producing Gas Wells by State and the Gulf of Mexico, December 31, 2006-2010 Alabama .......................................................... 6,227 6,591 6,860 6,913 7,026 Alaska.............................................................. 231 239 261 261 269 Arizona ............................................................ 7 7 6 6 5 Arkansas.......................................................... 3,814 4,773 5,592 6,314 7,397 California ......................................................... 1,451 1,540 1,645 1,643 1,580 Colorado .......................................................... 20,568 22,949 25,716 27,021 28,813 Gulf of Mexico.................................................. 2,419 2,552 1,527 1,984 1,852 Illinois...............................................................

491

Microsoft Word - table_06.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 6. Wellhead Value and Marketed Production of Natural Gas, 2004-2008, and by State, 2008 2004 Total ............................ 15,223,749 -- 5.46 19,517,491 106,521,974 2005 Total ............................ 15,425,867 -- 7.33 18,927,095 138,750,746 2006 Total ............................ 15,981,421 -- 6.39 19,409,674 124,074,399 2007 Total ............................ R 16,335,710 -- R 6.25 R 20,196,346 R 126,164,553 2008 Total ............................ 18,424,440 -- 7.96 21,239,516 169,038,089 Alabama ............................... 246,747 2,382,188 9.65 257,884 2,489,704 Alaska................................... 337,359 2,493,128 7.39 398,442 2,944,546 Arizona ................................. 503 3,568 7.09 523 3,710 Arkansas...............................

492

Microsoft Word - table_21.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 Table 21. Number of Natural Gas Industrial Consumers by Type of Service and State, 2008-2009 Alabama ...................... 2,476 281 2,757 2,789 271 3,060 Alaska.......................... 2 4 6 2 1 3 Arizona ........................ 285 98 383 274 116 390 Arkansas...................... 648 456 1,104 582 443 1,025 California ..................... 36,124 R 3,467 R 39,591 35,126 3,762 38,888 Colorado ...................... 341 4,475 4,816 297 4,787 5,084 Connecticut.................. 2,386 810 3,196 2,228 910 3,138 Delaware ..................... 96 69 165 39 73 112 Florida.......................... 161 288 449 123 484 607 Georgia........................ 1,003 1,887 2,890 956 1,298 2,254 Hawaii.......................... 27 0 27 25 0 25 Idaho............................ 108 91 199 109 78 187 Illinois...........................

493

Microsoft Word - table_21.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 8 Table 21. Number of Natural Gas Industrial Consumers by Type of Service and State, 2004-2005 Alabama ...................... 2,495 R 304 R 2,799 2,487 299 2,786 Alaska.......................... 6 4 10 7 5 12 Arizona ........................ 328 86 414 319 106 425 Arkansas...................... 782 R 441 R 1,223 671 449 1,120 California ..................... 39,426 2,061 41,487 38,150 2,076 40,226 Colorado ...................... 393 3,782 4,175 364 3,954 4,318 Connecticut.................. 2,625 845 3,470 2,618 819 3,437 Delaware ..................... 134 52 186 124 55 179 Florida.......................... R 174 224 R 398 159 273 432 Georgia........................ R 993 2,168 R 3,161 854 2,599 3,453 Hawaii.......................... 29 0 29 28 0 28 Idaho............................ 117 79 196 116 79 195

494

Microsoft Word - table_05.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 Table 5. Number of Wells Producing Gas and Gas Condensate by State and the Gulf of Mexico, December 31, 2001-2005 Alabama .......................................................... 4,597 4,803 5,157 5,526 5,523 Alaska.............................................................. 170 165 195 224 227 Arizona ............................................................ 8 7 9 6 6 Arkansas.......................................................... 4,825 6,755 7,606 3,460 2,878 California ......................................................... 1,244 1,232 1,249 1,272 1,356 Colorado .......................................................... 22,117 23,554 18,774 16,718 22,691 Gulf of Mexico.................................................. 3,271 3,245 3,039 2,781 2,123 Illinois...............................................................

495

EM International Program Action Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE PROGRAM] October, 2012 EM INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE PROGRAM] October, 2012 E M I n t e r n a t i o n a l P r o g r a m s Page 1 ACTION TABLE Subject Lead Office Engaging Country Meeting Location Purpose Status Date of Event 3 rd US/German Workshop on Salt Repository Research, Design and Operations N. Buschman, EM-22 Germany Albuquerque & Carlsbad, NM Continue collaboration with Germans on salt repository research, design and operations. Draft agenda prepared. October 8-12, 2012 International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation (IFNEC) Ministerial R. Elmetti, EM- 2.1 Multilateral Marrakech, Morocco To support the development of nuclear energy infrastructure globally through workforce training, information sharing, and approaches related to the safe, secure and responsible use of

496

Microsoft Word - table_07.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 7. Natural Gas Processed, Liquids Extracted, and Estimated Extraction Loss by State, 2009 Alabama .................................. 248,232 11,667 17,232 42,984 Alaska...................................... 2,830,034 19,542 22,925 86,767 Arkansas.................................. 2,352 125 168 541 California ................................. 198,213 11,042 13,722 45,669 Colorado .................................. 1,233,260 47,705 67,607 174,337 Illinois....................................... 164 24 31 84 Kansas..................................... 370,670 18,863 26,948 72,922 Kentucky.................................. 60,167 2,469 3,270 9,982 Louisiana ................................. 2,175,026 67,067 95,359 250,586 Michigan .................................. 23,819 2,409

497

Microsoft Word - table_08.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 8. Supplemental Gas Supplies by State, 2006 (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado ...................... 0 11 0 0 6,138 6,149 Connecticut.................. 0 91 0 0 0 91 Delaware ..................... 0 * 0 0 0 * Georgia........................ 0 3 0 0 0 3 Hawaii.......................... 2,610 3 0 0 0 2,613 Illinois........................... 0 13 0 0 0 13 Indiana......................... 0 2 0 0 1,640 1,642 Iowa ............................. 0 * 0 0 46 46 Kentucky...................... 0 3 0 0 0 3 Maryland ...................... 0 41 0 0 0 41 Massachusetts............. 0 51 0 0 0 51 Minnesota .................... 0 13 0 0 0 13 Missouri ....................... 0 78 0 0 0 78 Nebraska ..................... 0 19 0 0 0 19 New Hampshire ........... 0 92 0 0 0 92 New Jersey .................. 0 0 0 0 175 175 New York .....................

498

Microsoft Word - table_09.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

20 20 Table 9. Summary of U.S. Natural Gas Imports and Exports, 2004-2008 Imports Volume (million cubic feet) Pipeline Canada a .................................................... 3,606,543 3,700,454 3,589,995 3,782,708 3,589,221 Mexico ...................................................... 0 9,320 12,749 54,062 43,314 Total Pipeline Imports............................. 3,606,543 3,709,774 3,602,744 3,836,770 3,632,535 LNG Algeria....................................................... 120,343 97,157 17,449 77,299 0 Australia.................................................... 14,990 0 0 0 0 Egypt......................................................... 0 72,540 119,528 114,580 54,839 Equatorial Guinea .....................................

499

Microsoft Word - table_07.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 7. Natural Gas Processed, Liquids Extracted, and Estimated Extraction Loss by State, 2007 Alabama .................................. 257,443 13,381 19,831 48,922 Alaska...................................... 2,965,956 22,419 26,332 99,472 Arkansas.................................. 11,532 126 162 552 California ................................. 206,239 11,388 13,521 47,045 Colorado .................................. 888,705 27,447 38,180 102,563 Florida...................................... 2,422 103 132 423 Illinois....................................... 235 38 48 131 Kansas..................................... 391,022 19,600 28,063 74,941 Kentucky.................................. 38,158 1,455 1,957 5,917 Louisiana ................................. 2,857,443 77,905 110,745

500

All Consumption Tables.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6 6 State Energy Data 2011: Consumption Table C11. Energy Consumption by Source, Ranked by State, 2011 Rank Coal Natural Gas a Petroleum b Retail Electricity Sales State Trillion Btu State Trillion Btu State Trillion Btu State Trillion Btu 1 Texas 1,695.2 Texas 3,756.9 Texas 5,934.3 Texas 1,283.1 2 Indiana 1,333.4 California 2,196.6 California 3,511.4 California 893.7 3 Ohio 1,222.6 Louisiana 1,502.9 Louisiana 1,925.7 Florida 768.0 4 Pennsylvania 1,213.0 New York 1,246.9 Florida 1,680.3 Ohio 528.0 5 Illinois 1,052.2 Florida 1,236.6 New York 1,304.0 Pennsylvania 507.6 6 Kentucky 1,010.6 Pennsylvania 998.6 Pennsylvania 1,255.6 New York 491.5